{"meta":{"query_hash":"0a8af4e9cde1","filters":{"topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems"},"cohort_total":1095,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":1095,"exported":1095,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0a8af4e9cde1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Law%2C+Economics%2C+and+Judicial+Systems"},"results":[{"id":"W1013815327","doi":"","title":"The No A-Wave ERG Paradigm: Hiding or Absent?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Montreal Children's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Erg; Physics; Optics; Retina","score_opus":0.0874795770187266,"score_gpt":0.30145555752449943,"score_spread":0.21397598050577282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1013815327","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26907903,0.0066966643,0.28974625,0.16745903,0.0035922255,0.00047265814,0.001294329,0.0010458669,0.26061392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658699,0.0016846329,0.018182695,0.0073723514,0.001626338,0.00017060364,0.00013404225,0.00013625987,0.004823282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975483,0.0007778539,0.0002160768,0.0004836057,0.0006440989,0.0003301049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98601985,0.0063939546,0.0013488708,0.0036858816,0.0013812925,0.0011701236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074016894,0.00079237757,0.0009462269,0.001346781,0.0010744798,0.0043366565,0.0028394905,0.004531274,0.01089693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021804685,0.00044220817,0.00077544426,0.0005352438,0.0076135034,0.01025373,0.004271602,0.004962829,0.0013913036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00110682,0.00045358436,0.008424784,0.00031527373,0.000067651476,0.0011579794,0.00088502537,0.0006440499,0.008341114,0.8640331,0.010963722,0.103606865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020839857,0.00020118056,0.0042041442,0.00026252057,0.00006708024,0.0025084156,0.000565951,0.006498971,0.0017417344,0.9759393,0.007751709,0.000050660223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007721444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072415365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01089693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090124103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013900383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039144337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W114708985","doi":"","title":"Rethinking negligence in force majeure clauses: risk allocation, fairness and certainty in commercial contracts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Force majeure; Certainty; Actuarial science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019840517805187433,"score_gpt":0.19471012112562883,"score_spread":0.17486960332044138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W114708985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5226845,0.010230585,0.25549224,0.050756782,0.00045677627,0.00030058395,0.00014996518,0.000072805655,0.15985574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925984,0.00046053148,0.004380457,0.00057459506,0.00012658795,0.000020279062,0.0000053558533,0.0000073024885,0.0018264886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891832,0.005260415,0.00074843154,0.0009530074,0.0025761733,0.0012786856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95289713,0.03887459,0.0034343374,0.0022147754,0.0020226352,0.00055649265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019625733,0.00037857075,0.00087771035,0.0012388752,0.0027459841,0.007385316,0.0020372497,0.006445106,0.0021931431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052318905,0.00056976726,0.0012883561,0.0011786484,0.015516249,0.009548029,0.0036194546,0.0049615484,0.00015659814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033231656,0.000022501625,0.0019107747,0.000029597773,0.000018349132,0.00017025945,0.0013878173,0.0051682144,0.00016126868,0.98059034,0.0005394926,0.009968243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026923135,0.000035315217,0.0025932735,0.000103723665,0.00003556173,0.000084011124,0.00057116227,0.012650906,0.00038393447,0.9799265,0.0035482289,0.000040533294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018259602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012428694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019625733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008135237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050103506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10379207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1174753871","doi":"10.71781/1640","title":"La responsabilité des intermédiaires techniques en droit pénal canadien, à la lumière des pratiques internationales","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.024538956250327346,"score_gpt":0.27708935725719464,"score_spread":0.25255040100686726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1174753871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051306043,0.010523672,0.009411303,0.03780004,0.0009099722,0.00008075916,0.0002836177,0.00016297484,0.88952166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7040008,0.006981225,0.0033463812,0.008367046,0.0004556157,0.00020047347,0.00023673732,0.0002773902,0.27613434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919884,0.0022811173,0.00025713976,0.0011110362,0.002746752,0.0016155817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924844,0.0031791662,0.0010482157,0.0010542554,0.0014503805,0.000783532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005208414,0.0005982347,0.00044127018,0.002344535,0.009558776,0.012239442,0.0016946387,0.003462698,0.027632173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012913888,0.00043902188,0.00047445073,0.0036567457,0.015607769,0.00436038,0.00551848,0.008972559,0.0031063196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018290768,0.000023073875,0.0018693476,0.00012395353,0.00001297382,0.000111768015,0.015875338,0.0002615891,0.0002147894,0.94493705,0.014520101,0.022031605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009643198,0.0000387392,0.010793295,0.0009553233,0.00003252026,0.0001826196,0.011729405,0.0004262452,0.0007129474,0.047978606,0.9270737,0.00006693539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08482724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10442172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91517276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010576589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015687037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16866702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1187090301","doi":"10.7202/1035694ar","title":"La vente sous contrôle de justice : comment le législateur se porte à la défense d’intérêts contradictoires","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018562731073639024,"score_gpt":0.21331006077088663,"score_spread":0.19474732969724762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1187090301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21347658,0.0051274165,0.02632486,0.15424791,0.00082087173,0.00013092191,0.00019584778,0.00014314584,0.59953237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608849,0.0005728405,0.0018108153,0.008305188,0.00011628258,0.00005280415,0.000025963132,0.000052945798,0.02817828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98832625,0.004941112,0.00030795438,0.001784443,0.0027400942,0.001900094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824921,0.008474151,0.0013088179,0.001965218,0.004921291,0.0008384954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010709998,0.0003901625,0.00059212104,0.00094534154,0.013251198,0.009590398,0.0026223713,0.0068652085,0.0061688195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022461273,0.00043644235,0.00075311237,0.0008884061,0.026342057,0.0040517934,0.0037136727,0.0065851384,0.00064232113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003819536,0.000021897864,0.0030886154,0.00009188607,0.00003135567,0.00031212805,0.033029616,0.0003676454,0.00053424947,0.9484464,0.006429564,0.007608308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011138427,0.00015727367,0.0351505,0.0012429885,0.00022870247,0.00048155992,0.05396199,0.005101694,0.004152706,0.43229926,0.46685863,0.00025332056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43518198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4909396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43518198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023380008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023072127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86529785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W119209353","doi":"","title":"Is Contract Law Necessary","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.02579766870553154,"score_gpt":0.21840280174979645,"score_spread":0.1926051330442649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W119209353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019889284,0.0074735084,0.046150874,0.230203,0.003242113,0.00012330126,0.00049035583,0.00016629398,0.6922613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89505494,0.00991448,0.013851131,0.03471969,0.0064627505,0.00033189924,0.00051046006,0.00020219405,0.038952436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98261064,0.0045012333,0.0011598575,0.0027745832,0.0061144745,0.0028391334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97652286,0.012912942,0.0018302826,0.0045722844,0.0029053176,0.0012561893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013777529,0.00045835308,0.0011921694,0.0013076589,0.006041027,0.010593943,0.001845006,0.010163223,0.021345876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034187533,0.00074140274,0.0012330713,0.0011436419,0.03244907,0.025027143,0.0048311776,0.0094229365,0.004524783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003267498,0.000005395739,0.00004357146,0.000017951988,0.0000019136098,0.000019438903,0.000117443975,0.000030712596,0.000023224022,0.9966877,0.0022593318,0.0007900344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019668421,0.000008060926,0.00014222942,0.000110365574,0.0000056258777,0.00010078566,0.00028423526,0.00016672493,0.00010527271,0.94372797,0.055320967,0.000008100197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035669617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018889966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021345876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006465636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009978622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0728634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W123683803","doi":"","title":"Social Host Liability: A Logical Extension of Commercial Host Liability?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Strict liability; Business; Duty of care; Law; Law and economics; Legal liability; Liability insurance; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.06365339759699438,"score_gpt":0.2540922324637081,"score_spread":0.1904388348667137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W123683803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06852848,0.002969518,0.06322014,0.1097194,0.00072095665,0.00021969131,0.00012101192,0.00012860245,0.7543722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9422782,0.0013805851,0.008839044,0.015375514,0.00084713043,0.00017631995,0.00006067343,0.000033130425,0.03100934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992502,0.0016682902,0.00038374882,0.0009879223,0.0027356069,0.0017225143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991265,0.0037748236,0.0011424522,0.0008149518,0.0024228434,0.00058000255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053334907,0.0003607078,0.00046641415,0.0012343986,0.0055147423,0.00496908,0.002234322,0.008452174,0.008170533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0138157895,0.00038921298,0.0011812133,0.000866617,0.026906086,0.010092755,0.005366497,0.0077728573,0.00071187183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024693543,0.000008592255,0.00043617716,0.000009012096,0.0000018337807,0.00017965313,0.00025823488,0.00011995702,0.000042516433,0.99656564,0.00078321976,0.0015927926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021275599,0.000057640573,0.002184381,0.00018435452,0.000022483642,0.00093034894,0.00143924,0.0021910584,0.00031423947,0.93877554,0.053835623,0.00004385904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06354852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05758897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06354852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009569571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018251508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1263572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W125961300","doi":"","title":"Class AMPs: Withdrawing the Corporate Veil on Judgment Proofing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Business; Sanctions; Tort; Law and economics; Incentive; Statutory law; Strict liability; Law; Economics; Accounting; Political science","score_opus":0.024130882981612797,"score_gpt":0.19807805165347053,"score_spread":0.17394716867185772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W125961300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077693634,0.00085495843,0.060150616,0.020973185,0.0014026032,0.0004049128,0.0009466263,0.00060877256,0.83696467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89403415,0.0003673262,0.010737241,0.0071498845,0.0010744247,0.00031145153,0.00022976077,0.00009301511,0.08600273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991013,0.001847532,0.00049319305,0.0016253522,0.0036865866,0.0013342475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98494947,0.005754521,0.0023860086,0.0033391279,0.0021780753,0.0013927569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055844937,0.0004568051,0.00050967414,0.001273756,0.0029998927,0.007410968,0.0021240877,0.0058651967,0.027805675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030251872,0.00032950245,0.00076671207,0.0006585211,0.0064083072,0.005895295,0.00442502,0.006075417,0.004838854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008945067,0.00007890877,0.001900939,0.000060475555,0.00001581199,0.00016460594,0.00029628814,0.0010333359,0.00050107314,0.93049306,0.034221392,0.031144755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024252021,0.00042391298,0.009062414,0.0003488872,0.000072309485,0.000644461,0.0005007901,0.009147862,0.0029040754,0.69562054,0.28087622,0.00015586456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035715932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042253314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027805675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024548466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004434708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09301931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W129003607","doi":"","title":"The Management of Ethical Risk and the Ethics of Risk Management","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Risk management; Perspective (graphical); Information ethics; Engineering ethics; Focus (optics); Applied ethics; IT risk; Order (exchange); Risk society; Business; Political science; Risk analysis (engineering); IT risk management; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.011575897611512488,"score_gpt":0.22411615204451218,"score_spread":0.2125402544329997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W129003607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027063455,0.021805953,0.2801784,0.24491568,0.0016250123,0.00021565321,0.000093226176,0.000094381874,0.42400828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.892381,0.013206306,0.0496717,0.015694128,0.0030301563,0.00040160798,0.000047890135,0.00008843915,0.025478754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97038865,0.020701699,0.00091597554,0.001151933,0.005441232,0.001400534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97260284,0.019305013,0.0027651002,0.0017232611,0.0024356495,0.001168155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021298453,0.00067765807,0.00069525134,0.0016430778,0.004612413,0.01290246,0.0014806534,0.008232263,0.0035011752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023563627,0.0004983691,0.00057460595,0.0013849648,0.03455089,0.010009487,0.005436281,0.007889431,0.000681817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003036976,0.000006536918,0.0001398943,0.00002201819,0.000003803624,0.000036142887,0.0005948232,0.0005659673,0.0000388836,0.9942648,0.0012268833,0.0030971987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044084327,0.00001337713,0.0001611839,0.000107354725,0.0000031260913,0.00006880204,0.0005398634,0.00089232,0.00008706694,0.97030413,0.02780746,0.000010849952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019408263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015026161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021298453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005524956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008385111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112638354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W135468394","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2446952","title":"Avoiding the Next Global Financial Crisis: A Canadian Perspective, Focusing on the 'Boundedly Rational Consumer'","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Financial crisis; Economics; Business; Advertising; Marketing; Macroeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.022941510224842705,"score_gpt":0.2145861859066083,"score_spread":0.1916446756817656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W135468394","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037550677,0.0114979,0.005682801,0.43539086,0.0009180895,0.00006215485,0.0003006663,0.00005584595,0.508541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9201421,0.014485021,0.004470875,0.029529482,0.00052489364,0.000040993793,0.00014288168,0.00006535164,0.030598477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764806,0.00039051613,0.000038326172,0.00022316296,0.000651108,0.001048841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970394,0.00061166025,0.00023966291,0.00012366107,0.001039231,0.0009463303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036826357,0.0006639014,0.00060192717,0.0019395836,0.014112626,0.012465227,0.0028796527,0.010388736,0.007808401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008675682,0.00022533703,0.00055778516,0.003041621,0.021988764,0.0058523985,0.002680356,0.0077756713,0.0003358062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002067661,0.000021059705,0.0008802318,0.000056782028,0.00001000239,0.00015443112,0.0027968013,0.0017917657,0.00006671997,0.96375394,0.022836616,0.0076110144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004170717,0.000033082448,0.0054296902,0.00051963836,0.000048750262,0.00019241992,0.017784841,0.0036543962,0.00022956895,0.7046728,0.26727816,0.00011485756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9477243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9643538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059017044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059017044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13889807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42820066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W141936586","doi":"","title":"Public reason, social choice, and cooperation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Rational choice theory (criminology); sort; Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Public choice; Rational expectations; Social choice theory; Law and economics; Rationality; Management science; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Mathematical economics; Law; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06304508366798091,"score_gpt":0.22223712821579525,"score_spread":0.15919204454781433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W141936586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07800547,0.014960635,0.052745223,0.14535643,0.0006034325,0.00010926213,0.00023760986,0.00017110676,0.7078108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97636455,0.0035030453,0.0041706827,0.002549784,0.00043091294,0.000100461366,0.00007409097,0.000022954237,0.012783558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950488,0.0028306518,0.0001074695,0.0005551105,0.0007759068,0.00068200787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926006,0.0049537905,0.0007627061,0.0006574634,0.00048621566,0.0005391595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067252796,0.00048484193,0.0007371261,0.0017475778,0.003451663,0.006594846,0.0010810688,0.004798973,0.007110308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007948365,0.000202914,0.00056555297,0.0017259908,0.025683304,0.006410457,0.003820834,0.003201745,0.00057450385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007073187,0.000008132094,0.00012942938,0.000012145905,0.000004972994,0.000018592762,0.00025665932,0.00056919525,0.000010745898,0.99576354,0.0012438623,0.0019756067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008835031,0.000004087535,0.000110718785,0.000014995164,0.0000021346018,0.000009466004,0.00015040358,0.000347013,0.00001246512,0.99162734,0.0077094445,0.0000029799028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005626652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038596822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007110308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006367132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005307254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046196997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1426061312","doi":"10.2469/cfm.v24.n3.14","title":"Profit, Profession, and Service","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CFA Magazine","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Service (business); Marketing","score_opus":0.024056027611524505,"score_gpt":0.2119940861186726,"score_spread":0.1879380585071481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1426061312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055095265,0.11062049,0.00066629716,0.20114802,0.012012424,0.000014785733,0.00082734803,0.00010630032,0.66909486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2534747,0.0681239,0.000818772,0.052745223,0.036423903,0.00008726208,0.0007301119,0.00015559276,0.58744055],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930525,0.00012156364,0.00002705254,0.00007423471,0.00037943217,0.000092479764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974178,0.0012245005,0.00015611785,0.000099369194,0.00064123847,0.0004610095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007177545,0.00054545724,0.00042044694,0.002643973,0.004007129,0.008512659,0.0003456769,0.002745847,0.026597986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006610851,0.0003040171,0.0002065995,0.0032837524,0.0037016405,0.0042949277,0.0009159392,0.0044348366,0.0046149134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030427756,0.000044102766,0.00238345,0.000044120723,0.0000082173865,0.000030194595,0.0005141319,0.00012808586,0.000075453776,0.26392668,0.69116396,0.041651092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007017678,0.000013781206,0.0120701,0.00020533067,0.000012411386,0.00003364668,0.00111979,0.00013006605,0.000041305175,0.043524202,0.94282794,0.0000144177675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059309978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17582032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059309978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006454206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057557886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11792952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1457438853","doi":"10.71781/2444","title":"Exécution au Québec de sûretés présentant des liens avec plus d'une juridiction canadienne dans le contexte d'une faillite","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hydro-Québec; Royal Bank of Canada; General Mills","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028751830393599947,"score_gpt":0.259561127937067,"score_spread":0.23080929754346705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1457438853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5054902,0.0034712618,0.0041052867,0.031034721,0.0004144791,0.00022694476,0.00078523904,0.00011447022,0.45435742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8816188,0.0011421235,0.0013250493,0.002799879,0.000036599464,0.0000819144,0.00026882734,0.00003063242,0.11269616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994686,0.0010052104,0.00015160814,0.00064621115,0.0017865056,0.0017244018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917571,0.0011806514,0.00070906704,0.000542666,0.004386654,0.0014237028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034111382,0.00022505039,0.0004247935,0.0012292864,0.013483491,0.007133968,0.0014160109,0.0017242588,0.012696524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0087978,0.00029332668,0.00031261283,0.0022251594,0.006243273,0.0015750823,0.0022592011,0.0034205853,0.0009091478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021690763,0.00015796673,0.10119141,0.0005501621,0.00015253937,0.0015806251,0.118798405,0.0036126596,0.0032744284,0.59117556,0.0735841,0.1057052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005835432,0.0001183743,0.29985702,0.001024857,0.00013725349,0.00025692215,0.09971613,0.0017445913,0.0017433033,0.0151359085,0.58000135,0.00020593285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9411297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9807241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058870316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05475554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.090034686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3972811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1462945792","doi":"","title":"Philosophical Foundations of Contract Law, by Gregory Klass, George Letsas & Prince Saprai, eds","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.04837655532204342,"score_gpt":0.24435445294597602,"score_spread":0.19597789762393258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1462945792","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012590283,0.7312682,0.007810555,0.15672557,0.0042318394,0.000016705124,0.00018403407,0.00006097092,0.09844301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.108153425,0.7270796,0.013372691,0.026399156,0.0155869275,0.00013044217,0.0003498502,0.00016377005,0.108764134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868125,0.00041086893,0.00008202682,0.0001536153,0.0005796375,0.00009253235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976675,0.0014607552,0.0001766081,0.00013817332,0.00037053556,0.0001864062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033465836,0.0008629334,0.0006855325,0.002139466,0.0024598609,0.008700853,0.0013041197,0.004740916,0.008546096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006198871,0.0009122286,0.0005481016,0.0035180217,0.011407353,0.010758994,0.001988391,0.006532317,0.0028679483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014245299,0.000026933136,0.00017828366,0.00018232103,0.00000855126,0.000027270113,0.0011222649,0.00034105137,0.000055564913,0.72575104,0.2401815,0.032110997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000866868,0.0000049544888,0.00059330254,0.0005156108,0.0000051029697,0.00010866218,0.0008523162,0.00034555697,0.00004325631,0.54026747,0.45724463,0.000010440402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013167897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01701658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013167897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005849755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073687728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042443097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1470830879","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495564.008","title":"Domestic obligations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal status; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.032956414754821584,"score_gpt":0.1848996343221509,"score_spread":0.1519432195673293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1470830879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017558085,0.00055329903,0.0037678697,0.0016334017,0.00015833414,0.00005110676,0.0003225125,0.000056209396,0.9917014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23190273,0.0032660547,0.008263019,0.0035492876,0.0007037317,0.00040042456,0.0015219535,0.0002843736,0.7501084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961534,0.00090583396,0.0002724949,0.0005247251,0.0014542799,0.00068930455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750924,0.00056183327,0.00016780787,0.0005308809,0.0009940271,0.00023628303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002723752,0.0006579373,0.0005745378,0.0014823993,0.0033976522,0.006524511,0.001231302,0.0030810444,0.074581854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007769353,0.00044961646,0.00039972737,0.0014926937,0.003758978,0.006275556,0.004665202,0.0029884428,0.023019498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036434305,0.000008637049,0.00012557661,0.000021895698,0.0000015053868,0.00003722801,0.00055365195,0.00006282021,0.000087044544,0.9642741,0.022105457,0.012718491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043850964,0.0000106963935,0.00044203326,0.00012033994,0.0000041692592,0.00020552202,0.0005545751,0.0001475685,0.00021920641,0.2259697,0.7723095,0.000012297332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004387972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040704836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074581854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035581395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045691445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24950117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1479991023","doi":"","title":"Bijural services as factors of production","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada Research Chairs; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Computer science; Business; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.021926230067131364,"score_gpt":0.21161081178228994,"score_spread":0.18968458171515856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1479991023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13604954,0.00847351,0.40121225,0.007437445,0.0002732934,0.00046660198,0.002304558,0.00067927234,0.44310352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90038985,0.0050108405,0.05854904,0.00023560408,0.00026548404,0.0002479355,0.00050799735,0.00013549127,0.034657918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660045,0.001310793,0.00019668712,0.00047668902,0.0009732286,0.00044209932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99302495,0.0038191709,0.0010376441,0.00083289936,0.0007726339,0.00051263894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021278062,0.0009557797,0.0006797075,0.0033048026,0.0018893067,0.007996175,0.0013023565,0.0017519931,0.03160506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011628774,0.0006481632,0.00085738226,0.005130177,0.0063145286,0.0088051725,0.0038523925,0.001861815,0.0035341794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021348405,0.000014873628,0.0014875175,0.00008907095,0.000010367801,0.00014739828,0.00037695724,0.0023598955,0.00025106862,0.9827069,0.00064095313,0.01189369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002323016,0.00004597336,0.0030304187,0.00014612448,0.000024038278,0.0002749881,0.0007680374,0.007208747,0.00074697385,0.9401079,0.04759116,0.000032458032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005151555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045636613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03160506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004811976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002271857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10572946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482932075","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02193.x","title":"Robustness of Judicial Decisions to Valuation‐Method Innovation: An Exploratory Empirical Study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Finance &amp Accounting","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Peter's Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Shareholder; Actuarial science; Income approach; Economics; Robustness (evolution); Business; Accounting; Corporate governance; Finance","score_opus":0.12322846112132846,"score_gpt":0.33300622255899315,"score_spread":0.2097777614376647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482932075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99565965,0.0001834201,0.0016211178,0.00016558857,0.000010967613,0.0001490126,0.00015589542,0.000011074124,0.002043248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916613,0.000029660107,0.00042985418,0.000057589536,0.000018572417,0.00004567488,0.00010079056,0.0000064531764,0.00014526997],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8820029,0.08457905,0.0074760574,0.008572363,0.014626023,0.0027435762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1363306,0.73549366,0.09468932,0.023519496,0.008217803,0.0017491191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07465381,0.00037133056,0.0009089438,0.0024927726,0.0014238437,0.0046820072,0.0025294216,0.002344728,0.005217071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4218913,0.00050702435,0.00132709,0.002418276,0.0040829014,0.0032088752,0.00269677,0.003622508,0.00066375645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045172363,0.003914325,0.9403335,0.00025294936,0.0018026201,0.0007306661,0.008176071,0.0069967527,0.0018093941,0.005759095,0.0015264549,0.024180964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005798928,0.0046557365,0.9345209,0.00017718264,0.000835279,0.0008435838,0.0082622,0.033040185,0.0029596272,0.00999558,0.0038953277,0.00023445167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016283164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009994454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07465381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016312553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009422446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3948118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483212777","doi":"10.21991/c96m2s","title":"LAW V. CANADA: FORMATTING EQUALITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disk formatting; Law; Political science; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.05300220965465181,"score_gpt":0.21397958625565,"score_spread":0.1609773766009982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483212777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013285208,0.0057289614,0.0042054174,0.22851245,0.0036290342,0.0007239642,0.0075169886,0.0005966408,0.7358014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18271808,0.0043847593,0.00796665,0.32451907,0.0009918618,0.00075200765,0.0020027868,0.00037386685,0.47629085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795725,0.0019339428,0.0007189846,0.0013999458,0.009656343,0.0067183687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97683823,0.005849489,0.0006545234,0.0012173154,0.012434646,0.0030056997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00961253,0.00090589526,0.00089026283,0.002088036,0.018271213,0.010737933,0.0047919117,0.024394203,0.02513642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02854921,0.0012479067,0.0012526726,0.0033031804,0.0051916456,0.004269497,0.0028205037,0.010922105,0.003166125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006346863,0.000051327046,0.0017164131,0.00014875291,0.000022413098,0.00022172068,0.0013472699,0.00040483157,0.00064190204,0.33719885,0.6453924,0.0127906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021638429,0.000042433654,0.011776846,0.0005244371,0.00010251836,0.00015390223,0.0013504376,0.0005651139,0.0014492704,0.025240865,0.9583261,0.00025168565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9862686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9253373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0746627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30682927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54171836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483361827","doi":"","title":"Vol, fraude et autres infractions semblables et Internet","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.011072605907545677,"score_gpt":0.1821421238076847,"score_spread":0.17106951790013902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483361827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07288183,0.01068847,0.011673187,0.042139146,0.0004737367,0.00011391875,0.00049515255,0.00015299548,0.8613815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7604886,0.005705214,0.0029458741,0.003122414,0.00028371086,0.00007272788,0.00016827436,0.00007802273,0.22713523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99236554,0.00218872,0.00026899678,0.0008086819,0.0032561782,0.0011117914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99172497,0.0038762905,0.0011156873,0.001124249,0.0016559939,0.00050279376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036362663,0.00041163396,0.0003328447,0.003502788,0.0073961844,0.017333591,0.0013626894,0.004083295,0.016763374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01504508,0.00046398168,0.00040811938,0.0045987503,0.012363477,0.006426952,0.0032198934,0.0033810653,0.0015628233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011442142,0.000012521514,0.0021786082,0.000043506803,0.0000068427366,0.0002194395,0.003000733,0.0002978659,0.00011747643,0.9710215,0.00917832,0.013911699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026750327,0.000050527797,0.018822232,0.0006000802,0.00006714848,0.0008979349,0.008060689,0.0023668637,0.0017043693,0.2248253,0.74248755,0.000090601156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2273087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21757144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2273087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01822586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019136997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45197123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483487846","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1138018","title":"The Paradox of 'Fraud-on-the-Market Theory': Who Relies on the Efficiency of Market Prices?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Efficient-market hypothesis; Economics; Financial economics; Market efficiency; Microeconomics; Business; Stock market","score_opus":0.010230836862988698,"score_gpt":0.1979966810393899,"score_spread":0.1877658441764012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483487846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071222335,0.0091376575,0.13081606,0.64314455,0.0021504625,0.00008747614,0.00044256786,0.00036729692,0.14263162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94793266,0.003268702,0.008004648,0.02843597,0.005149388,0.00007333547,0.00008202921,0.00024008655,0.0068131904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891479,0.00511547,0.00046777242,0.0016799298,0.002695099,0.00089387316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8846049,0.08437935,0.007859869,0.015066596,0.006374708,0.001714631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028772332,0.0006172833,0.0026394613,0.0022657595,0.0028277661,0.011555649,0.004349009,0.014999748,0.011286909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12074462,0.0009168626,0.0013063636,0.0021380994,0.0327062,0.030878814,0.0040463763,0.015854033,0.0018220501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022039692,0.000021922091,0.0003848337,0.000038171092,0.000022683425,0.00004577352,0.0002911464,0.00046097586,0.0000416649,0.9837647,0.009130874,0.005775196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016018068,0.0000045599363,0.0001647771,0.00001862109,0.000004814185,0.00003080751,0.00006704279,0.0014060079,0.000061152066,0.995105,0.0031103848,0.000010871441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024434135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012086809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028772332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036392896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004000069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15216452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483858286","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.31781","title":"CONFLICT, CO-OPERATION, AND CULTURE: A STUDY IN MULTIPARTY NEGOTIATIONS","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Context (archaeology); Political science; Constitution; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.07869433006806584,"score_gpt":0.2515261915545515,"score_spread":0.1728318614864857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483858286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97113234,0.0004152918,0.002299571,0.0012118805,0.000039024348,0.00015125771,0.000028229178,0.000008218309,0.024714278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669635,0.0003240664,0.00061108515,0.00017190451,0.00001558071,0.00011865466,0.00001923069,0.000010711355,0.0020325147],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97960347,0.015944019,0.0002989612,0.00067417644,0.0017021266,0.0017772384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97490954,0.019361157,0.0016924106,0.00064150215,0.0013303609,0.0020651422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012207931,0.0004899157,0.00058888097,0.0022425544,0.023305222,0.014059039,0.0028930425,0.0020427327,0.0030103934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025674336,0.0004637303,0.00043670347,0.0035991678,0.015324051,0.00550348,0.008601666,0.0043571247,0.00031603774],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004740442,0.00020855221,0.008124948,0.000049877035,0.000010716153,0.0005560088,0.96859545,0.00035114086,0.00017619766,0.014487124,0.00040926147,0.0069833966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000977564,0.000060872444,0.004462302,0.000055577584,0.0000048394404,0.00014203147,0.9835983,0.00074676884,0.00013316385,0.0024676602,0.008300625,0.0000181512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07353105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061981484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07353105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011328154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009059313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14620608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1486782493","doi":"","title":"The Market for Elite Law Firm Associates","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Matching (statistics); Meaning (existential); Empirical research; Business; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.018284480307461864,"score_gpt":0.21812229764920912,"score_spread":0.19983781734174727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1486782493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6584329,0.0005629004,0.014170201,0.011666588,0.000064700675,0.00011528666,0.00014342486,0.000118764554,0.3147253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763124,0.00017967731,0.00080481876,0.0006151224,0.000110885856,0.00004301909,0.000035685644,0.000009557924,0.021888707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817145,0.00035424103,0.0000354351,0.0003229655,0.00063534366,0.0004805449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929605,0.002103231,0.0017393067,0.00063304027,0.00044750934,0.0021163274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019610026,0.00009262564,0.00037099567,0.0009130025,0.003358809,0.00638006,0.0009393225,0.002019235,0.023880225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008156148,0.00024677435,0.00015226458,0.00081264344,0.0044558635,0.0045279656,0.003140357,0.0015197543,0.0017427838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011180911,0.0001607348,0.0141441235,0.000032552212,0.000007565235,0.00030456265,0.0024006183,0.0013894931,0.0011071573,0.937002,0.007161081,0.036178228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003487479,0.0006460549,0.050814714,0.00017463233,0.00004196723,0.0007660767,0.011812102,0.019706752,0.0018359026,0.72760326,0.1861477,0.000102086386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034549087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005599613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023880225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032241878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033619888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07988727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487759801","doi":"10.15173/esr.v13i1.466","title":"Longterm Contracts and Take-or-Pay Clauses in Natural Gas Markets","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energy Studies Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Flexibility (engineering); Duration (music); Term (time); Position (finance); Economics; Natural (archaeology); Natural experiment; Microeconomics; Finance; Management","score_opus":0.043288374931372206,"score_gpt":0.2577460800318907,"score_spread":0.21445770510051848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487759801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50428253,0.032508522,0.16300085,0.01592508,0.00033878288,0.00012794064,0.00037997807,0.00008919779,0.28334713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839115,0.0035817204,0.0043142303,0.00047040344,0.00027910163,0.000038217477,0.00006311437,0.000011240966,0.0073304223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753416,0.0008121736,0.00020527613,0.00028040798,0.00079372316,0.00037424668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98539215,0.009594924,0.003512076,0.00062392704,0.000521158,0.00035571118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043290453,0.00019483636,0.00044508642,0.0006938973,0.0013740963,0.003498056,0.0010483434,0.002501091,0.007069403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014175246,0.00028449923,0.00053249643,0.001229585,0.0046205837,0.0067875884,0.0014698564,0.0028041173,0.00032032758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029735642,0.000028893644,0.0015732232,0.00005533216,0.0000068497843,0.00011201669,0.00026804477,0.0026004754,0.0002452491,0.9841212,0.000489737,0.010469223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028540675,0.00005846925,0.005382517,0.00014443898,0.000017469574,0.00017313974,0.00054231525,0.0068352274,0.0003561836,0.9685789,0.017847007,0.000035780995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002572633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025532977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007069403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018280403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015823744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023649514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488010691","doi":"10.7202/016961ar","title":"Managing Global Legal Systems, by Gary W. Florkowski, London and New York : Routledge, 2006, 271 pages, ISBN 0-415369-45-2","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Humanities; Media studies; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03441088588980226,"score_gpt":0.2154761303152206,"score_spread":0.18106524442541833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488010691","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040764827,0.900857,0.0031974826,0.048932016,0.0032125895,0.000038614045,0.0004678518,0.00014714929,0.042739574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011057139,0.81781465,0.0054483595,0.007618792,0.00371269,0.0001108423,0.0007791003,0.00030507124,0.15315332],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991755,0.0001918496,0.000087766995,0.00014367132,0.00034075222,0.000060379673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834836,0.00090723997,0.00025485057,0.00009046408,0.00022126225,0.00017788487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019341074,0.002230682,0.00093092123,0.0036407695,0.0015501376,0.0064236093,0.001257186,0.0040037204,0.030082773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004775911,0.0014086162,0.0004746488,0.005975564,0.003961062,0.014755853,0.0026505853,0.0048941574,0.015155818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001590422,0.000015064422,0.0001949175,0.000629512,0.000012042346,0.00005418608,0.0010519184,0.0003666685,0.00018260443,0.029397985,0.8560434,0.11203585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052474693,0.0000067904443,0.0007957515,0.000954367,0.0000053296526,0.00013663525,0.00057156855,0.000114260736,0.00006195783,0.023782851,0.9735519,0.00001322442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020963179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038660508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030082773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004738606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054587983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10063684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493075240","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2793","title":"Justice as a Rounding Error?: Evidence of Subconscious Bias in Second-Degree Murder Sentences in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Subconscious; Heuristics; Preference; Discretion; Psychology; Rounding; Degree (music); Judicial discretion; Social psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Criminal law; Heuristic; Criminal justice; Law; Political science; Criminology; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Judicial review","score_opus":0.2162123312958435,"score_gpt":0.2873827416949354,"score_spread":0.07117041039909189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493075240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914643,0.00026459925,0.0001499378,0.001448999,0.000020103014,0.000053751428,0.0003930527,0.0000064849114,0.006198782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979221,0.00020823188,0.0001282275,0.00038208792,0.000009139225,0.000012057577,0.00016943426,0.000009994147,0.0011586302],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99400204,0.0007888653,0.0003198461,0.00079742615,0.0026839958,0.0014078786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96441764,0.0077549713,0.009585463,0.0021147793,0.01319917,0.0029279604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038874277,0.0002527071,0.0006617186,0.002189221,0.011040486,0.0033514954,0.0028081804,0.0015753628,0.0044081644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041206058,0.00061776,0.0003333627,0.0042231227,0.0041313404,0.001048796,0.0023539618,0.0023775739,0.00037440387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032346227,0.00024336709,0.91125876,0.0000867906,0.00008726043,0.00067692547,0.054851074,0.00024722173,0.00066347304,0.0027710435,0.00544258,0.023348005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028225462,0.00004392453,0.9727563,0.00008130457,0.000036535035,0.00020502518,0.020529794,0.0006164814,0.00026087379,0.0004592561,0.0049176672,0.00006455182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99466246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99756396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031569064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031569064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048421193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22905064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496204684","doi":"","title":"Shotguns and Deadlocks","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Valuation (finance); Equity (law); Value (mathematics); Valuation effects; Finance; Commerce; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01211194723244546,"score_gpt":0.18872652432219053,"score_spread":0.17661457708974507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496204684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14297883,0.011040704,0.348782,0.04502577,0.0011090076,0.00030236083,0.0001359321,0.00041645335,0.45020893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9645859,0.001841852,0.013019797,0.0028484317,0.00037994812,0.0001669066,0.000040852556,0.0001094429,0.017006923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97876614,0.008789706,0.0009430253,0.0031467078,0.004085364,0.004269071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9710962,0.01913631,0.003672493,0.0029758203,0.0017501346,0.0013689876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021114053,0.0005854523,0.0012396412,0.0029539005,0.010384315,0.0089067025,0.0029819969,0.008316297,0.014809251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05242807,0.0008116574,0.0016351038,0.0019427993,0.031536583,0.016914152,0.0139122,0.010209699,0.0010896527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041741946,0.000008002008,0.00016180734,0.00001331055,0.0000035139917,0.00008968318,0.00043775482,0.0003814335,0.000026110147,0.99633694,0.00054196914,0.0019952655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014183441,0.000014126394,0.00013660891,0.000070691065,0.0000077547675,0.00013948967,0.00060398626,0.0013137169,0.00012572503,0.9838935,0.013663094,0.00001725505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033860933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002584647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021114053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00620564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068569947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1116631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499700966","doi":"10.21991/c9f66b","title":"IMPOVERISHMENT OF THE LAW BY THE LAW: A CRITIQUE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S VISION OF THE RULE OF LAW AND THE FEDERAL PRINCIPLE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020252299983048484,"score_gpt":0.2229640320825438,"score_spread":0.20271173209949533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499700966","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011843065,0.015960697,0.016312255,0.85241866,0.002909902,0.00004798088,0.00009836291,0.000056443874,0.10035266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6575856,0.008235167,0.0090004075,0.2896461,0.015851228,0.00039169376,0.00007566525,0.00028272247,0.018931322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95506555,0.021892851,0.0024553032,0.0055906163,0.011858761,0.0031368383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9213671,0.063743,0.0029812346,0.0037955134,0.006391518,0.0017215591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042110093,0.0008141642,0.003449148,0.003994651,0.013081936,0.018672787,0.0063493103,0.047973365,0.002972697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07425591,0.0015089011,0.0023952536,0.003488541,0.085948184,0.016849574,0.006659096,0.054972555,0.0007555586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107339965,0.000014700541,0.00007862884,0.000019789704,0.000008518503,0.000029088982,0.0011366189,0.0001671105,0.00001806543,0.99005556,0.0068847514,0.0015765019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030362016,0.000010724897,0.00021749444,0.00012045447,0.000011676779,0.000034387915,0.0003632931,0.0003680129,0.000057289824,0.96894395,0.029818691,0.000023539316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039366495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02815895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047973365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020896062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025280729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22270215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1499929449","doi":"","title":"Optimal Contracting in Agency with Verifiable Ex Post Information","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse selection; Agency (philosophy); Information asymmetry; Verifiable secret sharing; Perfect information; Imperfect; Limited liability; Microeconomics; Economics; Position (finance); Economic rent; Principal–agent problem; Business; Actuarial science; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.011767998814987527,"score_gpt":0.18189697743658625,"score_spread":0.17012897862159873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499929449","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31481972,0.0039809244,0.5910803,0.007886753,0.00016902968,0.00044435478,0.00077936356,0.00026731187,0.08057218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93629086,0.0016232276,0.04903677,0.00031513348,0.00015874646,0.00032630397,0.00018643249,0.000053292297,0.012009147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884012,0.0077911983,0.00060539454,0.0012351326,0.00084350427,0.0011235488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9679454,0.024449298,0.0037007667,0.0018616744,0.0009720326,0.0010708799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011749511,0.0011160084,0.0022926333,0.0009245899,0.0012374499,0.0046709822,0.0016797708,0.0042271153,0.0050944914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028622843,0.0014395666,0.001198899,0.0013745996,0.0040934314,0.005735933,0.0030721275,0.0031132586,0.0006447005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037968304,0.00014849995,0.0009654192,0.00022866538,0.00009865596,0.00040180964,0.00031043103,0.15778588,0.0005625905,0.82625973,0.0013646996,0.011493938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021182488,0.00010493855,0.00044517848,0.00006007454,0.000028193235,0.00012258864,0.0001370369,0.17692237,0.00026371688,0.8194516,0.002217594,0.00003491251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026791007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018660218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011749511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037569804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003306787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06213808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501113772","doi":"10.1007/s11572-006-9007-9","title":"A. P. Simester (ed): Appraising Strict Liability","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Law and Philosophy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Liability; Strict liability; Sophistication; Normative; Criminal liability; Law and economics; Due diligence; Law; Criminal law; Recklessness; Political science; Relation (database); Culpability; Philosophy of law; Business; Sociology; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03654291292939747,"score_gpt":0.224651468550642,"score_spread":0.1881085556212445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501113772","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018242653,0.8577943,0.012139545,0.03202223,0.00467577,0.000040213126,0.00032789196,0.00008875422,0.0910871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041212413,0.9129795,0.009279587,0.002391725,0.0052362583,0.00004981119,0.00019877068,0.000054999946,0.028596863],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999121,0.00027441376,0.00006035157,0.00007100235,0.00043180154,0.0000414112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654984,0.0021203263,0.00029237225,0.0001001567,0.0007275601,0.00020977583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020068982,0.0011723159,0.00084248214,0.0053895777,0.00081843254,0.004029484,0.0011489607,0.00310343,0.03148607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060092323,0.00062522123,0.00041727102,0.0058218995,0.0021294786,0.005986589,0.0014776777,0.0027219949,0.008662446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006449886,0.000046912828,0.0016286754,0.0011346269,0.000035542664,0.0002077693,0.0006805698,0.001953868,0.00021078574,0.1089348,0.44928646,0.43581545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024832207,0.00009099925,0.010914288,0.0049245744,0.0000707706,0.0017541971,0.0012951914,0.0024208163,0.0005837189,0.32128626,0.6565718,0.00006258458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005982782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010492061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03148607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015601818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020038702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10533136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1503018418","doi":"","title":"Litigation Funding and the Problem of Agency Cost in Representative Actions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Institutional Repository at DePaul University (DePaul University)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Equity (law); Agency (philosophy); Political science; Business; Public administration; Law; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.031886709230950695,"score_gpt":0.19393664810982175,"score_spread":0.16204993887887106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1503018418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11232544,0.009456247,0.11884049,0.118192464,0.00078371906,0.00035968193,0.0004591093,0.00027043413,0.6393124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97290707,0.001686598,0.005109829,0.0024427115,0.0009324149,0.00030982436,0.00003970145,0.000061269944,0.016510788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94748193,0.027993457,0.0025183798,0.003933168,0.012530947,0.005542103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8345613,0.13225397,0.012043915,0.008950315,0.008955566,0.0032348402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03943795,0.000564258,0.0018480786,0.00407845,0.0043839347,0.013401913,0.0028421301,0.010206867,0.0189962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17409389,0.0009661075,0.0010673318,0.003669086,0.012174854,0.01578271,0.0054742903,0.006696504,0.0012062795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034945042,0.00002479627,0.0011370823,0.00004241011,0.0000175203,0.00008858089,0.00038929345,0.0017549617,0.000030680865,0.97843504,0.0037774784,0.014267296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011689284,0.00005588387,0.002241779,0.00022469198,0.000052368723,0.00025483017,0.0005546162,0.006358045,0.00016831043,0.9572607,0.03266314,0.000048698683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011064744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005693552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03943795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011423857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011501154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2085703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505043621","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1221","title":"Cost Strategies for Litigants: The Significance of R. v. Caron","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; Law; Interim; Deference; Doctrine; Political science; High Court; Supreme court; Standard of review; Tribunal; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.1204473483002514,"score_gpt":0.26703974296560745,"score_spread":0.14659239466535606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505043621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031148631,0.018638099,0.005700213,0.4219303,0.0018709236,0.0001237377,0.00004833536,0.00005940573,0.5204803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73115003,0.0069573834,0.0040551513,0.1891279,0.0025930775,0.00028248283,0.000034383076,0.00013428091,0.06566528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880684,0.004315587,0.00027009897,0.001560122,0.0035839886,0.002201764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889503,0.007821434,0.00036588835,0.000447927,0.0013700476,0.0010443493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011513271,0.0005671746,0.000659631,0.0013849166,0.0104253655,0.0158619,0.003738502,0.025121475,0.005786221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032439712,0.00050317514,0.0007363836,0.000839982,0.018036276,0.007948568,0.005136257,0.012823955,0.00083691336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018190716,0.00001740267,0.00049867283,0.00003539759,0.000008705523,0.0004163388,0.0014588222,0.00029729845,0.00012245236,0.9573726,0.029251277,0.010502974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000949711,0.00013785034,0.0017873497,0.00074311544,0.000053822318,0.0007554796,0.0060567874,0.0025112252,0.00039340896,0.63517714,0.35215947,0.00012923783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06806788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11514449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06806788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013239096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017018532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13534337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505123694","doi":"10.1023/a:1010305206996","title":"The Colour of the Judge's Eyes: Efficiency as a Criterion for the Legislature and for the Courts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Choice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Coase theorem; Doctrine; Exposition (narrative); CLARITY; Public finance; Law and economics; Pigou effect; Economics; Economic efficiency; Commercial law; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Keynesian economics; Transaction cost","score_opus":0.039191158780767885,"score_gpt":0.25313047944796113,"score_spread":0.21393932066719323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505123694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13754062,0.00478412,0.25494763,0.14939176,0.0014616798,0.00015622939,0.00029958945,0.00020403863,0.45121434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663726,0.00046426858,0.0153523525,0.0032444524,0.00072092714,0.00009291599,0.00003046515,0.00019186673,0.013530083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730111,0.016336497,0.0006969649,0.0025841326,0.005090138,0.0022810872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8936129,0.077956624,0.0056247762,0.0075333538,0.011614808,0.0036574984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030029068,0.0005581931,0.0017021245,0.0027038765,0.0071979957,0.015971782,0.0019650552,0.008151432,0.009312757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14522439,0.0008061343,0.0010015802,0.0021247852,0.03155325,0.016721362,0.0046644914,0.011266026,0.0017037148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048347054,0.000020208981,0.00082311773,0.000020183712,0.000016769627,0.000034325723,0.0009413249,0.0005754436,0.00015223649,0.98461664,0.004801721,0.007949746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003376584,0.000020543119,0.0016578628,0.000040252093,0.000021735239,0.000043393586,0.0006053974,0.0018206063,0.0004473897,0.9869006,0.00838188,0.000026407788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005387181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046987874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030029068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071937777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063259806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1588108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506284244","doi":"","title":"Love's Labor's Lost? Judicial Tenure Among Lower Federal Court Judges: 1945-2000","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Political science; Law; Federal court; Judicial independence; Economics; Demographic economics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.009389613866895845,"score_gpt":0.19728308064672406,"score_spread":0.1878934667798282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506284244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959467,0.0007181333,0.000027708576,0.0011905378,0.0000148126455,0.0000020805446,0.00026651513,0.0000014099112,0.0018320121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978961,0.0002729424,0.000009541965,0.00010665129,0.000035460547,0.000001514449,0.00020232952,7.0436283e-7,0.0014747749],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939704,0.000055444318,0.000027146622,0.000078415585,0.0001093987,0.000332579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656445,0.0003514655,0.0017012109,0.000080438214,0.00047548272,0.0008270602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008764802,0.00007117602,0.00025230506,0.0010637165,0.0013246345,0.0013166348,0.00048746317,0.00059463124,0.0025607052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004982695,0.00010902804,0.00011441069,0.0015875289,0.0006904957,0.000705845,0.00072912005,0.0010564044,0.00045366026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010011995,0.000072229814,0.9619724,0.000021719963,0.000014868393,0.00018289353,0.006650658,0.00011536227,0.00023889146,0.001326043,0.0048471903,0.02445755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017858304,0.000028509186,0.99437225,0.000013314412,0.0000036096274,0.00003601765,0.0017696853,0.000052173637,0.000038565384,0.000064699954,0.0036165519,0.0000027785327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09949355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2142052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09949355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026539378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008147811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19782889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507123548","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.34163","title":"Determining Poultry Indemnity Values: Examples and Lessons Learned from Poultry Disease Outbreaks in Canada and the United States","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Indemnity; Government (linguistics); Outbreak; Value (mathematics); Business; Legislation; Influenza A virus subtype H5N1; Actuarial science; Law; Political science; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.06201939581842777,"score_gpt":0.22434732878843824,"score_spread":0.16232793297001047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507123548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8938838,0.013544589,0.008621839,0.021086458,0.000099101126,0.00011985417,0.00076206954,0.000055297874,0.061826907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98514414,0.0071195792,0.0046506533,0.0005488638,0.000025907468,0.000011699336,0.00030188813,0.00002076186,0.0021765297],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997124,0.0010080355,0.000120438504,0.00014817227,0.0010977797,0.000501601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97706544,0.011283344,0.0008248813,0.00052038435,0.009823545,0.00048245623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005425731,0.00038466262,0.00050439604,0.0026107882,0.003833261,0.0030975183,0.0013209374,0.0013173824,0.0007323791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021520693,0.0002146369,0.00029350404,0.0045466037,0.003612191,0.0018719416,0.0012835206,0.0019066192,0.000078647754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003111616,0.00040668438,0.5948532,0.0005218336,0.00019788237,0.0056787515,0.05884385,0.015794387,0.00091050804,0.05928333,0.029652275,0.23354608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012769505,0.0001493436,0.60719424,0.001298237,0.00021257931,0.0015617305,0.1777098,0.04041309,0.0063503548,0.05482143,0.10986436,0.00029715398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93808347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9648586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06191653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02504845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01274286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18174005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507665246","doi":"","title":"Is the French Concept of Cause in Brazil's Civil Code?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Civil code; Code (set theory); Position (finance); Law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Commercial law","score_opus":0.01597719622313758,"score_gpt":0.21756621276211882,"score_spread":0.20158901653898123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507665246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14065626,0.014163211,0.034139875,0.16410735,0.0005711201,0.00009902603,0.00045599588,0.00012572356,0.6456814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98386025,0.001406507,0.0022892924,0.0029923823,0.0000686716,0.00002586334,0.000056911373,0.000020147252,0.009279959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948139,0.0020467308,0.0001638915,0.0005550282,0.0013472164,0.0010732119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99266934,0.003058428,0.000917419,0.0007968676,0.0021688826,0.0003890521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004061667,0.00030195893,0.0003716073,0.0016356629,0.0057667275,0.0061344835,0.00071470917,0.0027444789,0.0047123292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016277231,0.00021815115,0.0004488593,0.002114861,0.013902411,0.0052651814,0.0019504925,0.00256605,0.00038542942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003183528,0.0000024162068,0.0008579912,0.000013715192,0.0000019194617,0.00004598829,0.0023471415,0.00011063393,0.00003691153,0.98959446,0.0018524438,0.0051332354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026452693,0.00004488003,0.020365251,0.00064260187,0.000035640795,0.0005010558,0.009561264,0.002569327,0.00045658648,0.56952155,0.3961836,0.000091770395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33766773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31200114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33766773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020655798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017762985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6714046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509062265","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2379695","title":"Misleading Forecasts in Accounting Estimates: An Ethical Blind Spot?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Acquittal; Accounting information system; Financial accounting; Accounting scandals; Accounting standard; Management accounting; Fair value; Business; Political science; Audit; Law","score_opus":0.025598713535977775,"score_gpt":0.24711830815022146,"score_spread":0.22151959461424367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509062265","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024332855,0.011200441,0.12026726,0.8023978,0.007201692,0.00011099021,0.00049568946,0.00043882997,0.033554465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.783507,0.007802599,0.053274933,0.12823264,0.020173809,0.0002026916,0.0002174269,0.0007838436,0.005805055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8484682,0.1129351,0.0076259114,0.0068129855,0.022656612,0.0015011856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.35329238,0.51892245,0.043411996,0.042084124,0.038790774,0.0034981943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17277728,0.00080323697,0.0017485322,0.0038815737,0.0026179226,0.010484534,0.0028066996,0.0142659135,0.0055672447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.64821583,0.0010133741,0.0007312768,0.0035983606,0.013847667,0.016215676,0.0049236626,0.017912965,0.0024616963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068798015,0.00016742384,0.026116824,0.0006857255,0.00069782266,0.0010945152,0.014134039,0.005117964,0.00080034265,0.43643132,0.22930504,0.28476095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016095127,0.000059821275,0.004322239,0.0019250279,0.00014278354,0.0006914705,0.002827996,0.012838839,0.0013443168,0.9175558,0.057960354,0.00017037496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030734348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038166961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17277728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026436008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051990785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9137445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1509777155","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.914147","title":"A Quarter Century of Summary Judgment Practice in Six Federal District Courts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Political science; Psychology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.009976979968545263,"score_gpt":0.21987578765890015,"score_spread":0.20989880769035488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1509777155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47663206,0.012037815,0.01462159,0.23747648,0.0024265728,0.00011626574,0.0005464641,0.00028262506,0.25586015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95132285,0.0009074399,0.002929425,0.008655231,0.00042841112,0.00003508222,0.00008159583,0.00009159981,0.035548266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824644,0.008872795,0.0011652579,0.0023580557,0.003417324,0.0017223071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9669649,0.017784093,0.0020340504,0.0039064568,0.0070348345,0.0022755682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020618055,0.0001440023,0.00040616325,0.0017915486,0.01332972,0.014511741,0.0013582011,0.005134781,0.00519489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059479136,0.00059947046,0.00031880912,0.0026437305,0.009641763,0.005297069,0.0037611858,0.007842899,0.00064979045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002046811,0.00014196897,0.006632076,0.000106184416,0.00003400295,0.00033629555,0.05328489,0.0007105628,0.0011745521,0.7112297,0.07716502,0.1489801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057873418,0.00019542918,0.024169492,0.00045916555,0.000035413763,0.0002792914,0.031237733,0.0018438541,0.002731843,0.13283442,0.8059903,0.00016529139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018431973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060977817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020618055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010886456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008900802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10903996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1510026736","doi":"","title":"Split-Award Tort Reform and Settlement Outcomes: An Experimental Investigation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Punitive damages; Settlement (finance); Tort reform; Statute; Incentive; Business; Liability; Payment; Actuarial science; Tort; Order (exchange); Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.06326974105197425,"score_gpt":0.30900540697034634,"score_spread":0.2457356659183721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1510026736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98286164,0.00023310712,0.00232506,0.0006515483,0.00020381197,0.0025127297,0.0004827996,0.00004764934,0.010681622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782274,0.00042185487,0.004137799,0.0007060004,0.00023358763,0.005339631,0.0003785128,0.00003437472,0.0105208205],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99251646,0.0032521405,0.0005792513,0.0010419023,0.0014341599,0.001176123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91894037,0.054555908,0.014673997,0.0071269292,0.0018143528,0.0028884385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013784878,0.001866488,0.002469075,0.0012246934,0.0017825474,0.0041821627,0.004461174,0.005507349,0.032139108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03740867,0.0011066261,0.0019194301,0.0013210186,0.00396342,0.004238662,0.0031115618,0.009644431,0.0029780667],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.16198927,0.59869593,0.02885774,0.002394492,0.0015517655,0.0015439036,0.0048878347,0.027086925,0.025091473,0.08783281,0.0085111605,0.05155677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.12477965,0.500493,0.060395475,0.00058845314,0.0037271732,0.00071015256,0.0061883777,0.12421201,0.016469667,0.14255176,0.019229373,0.0006549749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001811734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016803776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032139108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023262934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027458053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10751599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1511038408","doi":"","title":"Nash Implementable Liability Rules for Judgement-Proof Injurers","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematical economics; Judgement; Strict liability; Economics; Welfare economics; Liability; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.028694599419655253,"score_gpt":0.23266473648007727,"score_spread":0.20397013706042202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1511038408","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121333234,0.0006239848,0.750765,0.0025816874,0.00022376493,0.0002570329,0.00040911348,0.00033665242,0.12346944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8364251,0.00041469958,0.11893293,0.0004681172,0.000141569,0.00024782144,0.00024232692,0.00016189984,0.04296544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912805,0.0028816338,0.0009655413,0.001069597,0.0027450048,0.0010578014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862627,0.007911219,0.0010449848,0.0018117314,0.0022567625,0.0007125675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00884894,0.00064044824,0.001088875,0.0013769377,0.0014733676,0.0056652213,0.0029391171,0.0026885173,0.00996309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03478583,0.00065341097,0.0017710937,0.0008926287,0.0037238288,0.0059557254,0.0034888973,0.0031287754,0.0016280117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000403717,0.000022131384,0.00047481697,0.00004215987,0.000015587106,0.00012980941,0.00022478242,0.016958507,0.0005950986,0.9731665,0.0009871599,0.0073429877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004042787,0.00002180841,0.0002899442,0.000041249074,0.000021179749,0.00010279478,0.00011235674,0.06158652,0.00077043497,0.93202657,0.00495945,0.000027279628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058976095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057660253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00996309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035693063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030374813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04679823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512563031","doi":"10.29173/alr387","title":"Through the Looking Glass, Darkly: Resurfice Corp. v. Hanke","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Law; Test (biology); Certainty; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06548036357892487,"score_gpt":0.2560360885188858,"score_spread":0.19055572493996095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512563031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028398575,0.057793505,0.00087384396,0.30888,0.0040163356,0.00014896631,0.0013545266,0.00025831632,0.59827596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29444793,0.02199812,0.000780745,0.23378897,0.0016722343,0.00007850638,0.0006929899,0.00016720085,0.44637337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653983,0.000394385,0.00008130479,0.00030382615,0.0015529654,0.0011277578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964007,0.0016928086,0.00013621479,0.00014346087,0.0011496505,0.00047704775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035022185,0.0003928667,0.0004973761,0.0015851936,0.007973547,0.006694791,0.0020686404,0.012663781,0.013696052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009494444,0.0006289719,0.00039640776,0.001343744,0.003473591,0.0021907235,0.0013709611,0.009601269,0.0021912833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042088577,0.000025331718,0.0013328696,0.00012076975,0.00001911223,0.00044781165,0.0006444129,0.00018688389,0.00030089234,0.09653816,0.8809556,0.019386059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006331064,0.000038054895,0.015496552,0.00067871856,0.00014937036,0.0002847323,0.00241728,0.0003534233,0.0010971919,0.025102051,0.95420164,0.00011772976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6927574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91051495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6927574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017801296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03480693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.618104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512774026","doi":"","title":"The Cost of Costs: The Unfortunate Deterrence of Everyday Civil Litigation in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Civil litigation; Civil procedure; Deterrence theory; Business; Cost-shifting; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.009170961247937651,"score_gpt":0.18590814080862975,"score_spread":0.1767371795606921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512774026","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32219818,0.008836585,0.0025828893,0.4306448,0.0011790683,0.00018203152,0.0007930988,0.00019206239,0.23339128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92914796,0.0041710217,0.0017209845,0.025179962,0.0002410104,0.00003273794,0.00020503426,0.00007806068,0.03922319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99152607,0.0004922521,0.00017839145,0.0005437185,0.004745813,0.002513805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862055,0.002532181,0.0008296492,0.00031266428,0.0056654136,0.0044545094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00310161,0.00030061576,0.0004920479,0.0020817847,0.021790389,0.010350308,0.0029206325,0.0036382973,0.0085622445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016428316,0.00062225334,0.0005731141,0.002284583,0.0065096267,0.0025312123,0.003793798,0.0069873426,0.00038815362],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002987492,0.00023408316,0.07331153,0.00040471932,0.00022432061,0.0037325672,0.015715767,0.0046173874,0.0019152735,0.33365175,0.32935718,0.2365368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018206262,0.00015757527,0.2198805,0.0006916867,0.00024942317,0.0013372054,0.03054885,0.009246665,0.0014594506,0.049993195,0.6857346,0.00051868375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99870646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20403348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20403348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26211894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92320836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512776649","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the Battle of the Forms: A Case Study Approach to Legal Strategy Development","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Doctrine; Dilemma; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025876680245836732,"score_gpt":0.2276453204594984,"score_spread":0.20176864021366167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512776649","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3164905,0.019269021,0.11306805,0.10030988,0.0014114084,0.0026100788,0.00047297523,0.00010579472,0.44626224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8814794,0.009936947,0.068574995,0.0061418675,0.00029144337,0.001384921,0.00015707054,0.00008026082,0.03195312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735127,0.022029635,0.0003898628,0.0005631389,0.0019345225,0.0015702214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712503,0.025042398,0.00091619237,0.00070496957,0.0011813109,0.0009048075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019088697,0.00096753344,0.0010185742,0.0053109704,0.017165925,0.017710416,0.005000405,0.012766703,0.005691943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018890196,0.00084248214,0.0012845828,0.0072260625,0.025427531,0.016503787,0.011458412,0.009891486,0.00068068085],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044411903,0.0003124717,0.0016846983,0.00023401077,0.000012640792,0.006521684,0.06587606,0.0011768843,0.00028664543,0.9044025,0.006325525,0.013122452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011719481,0.00037302516,0.0022420187,0.0021981332,0.00005447015,0.004862696,0.38608664,0.012137251,0.0016891937,0.27087042,0.3192395,0.00012942775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018805271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04765665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019088697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016502455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008658766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11973423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512878900","doi":"","title":"Negotiated Settlements: The development of economic and legal thinking","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human settlement; Incentive; Transparency (behavior); Commission; Business; Coping (psychology); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Market economy; Law; Engineering; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.040195152573047045,"score_gpt":0.2798397536331419,"score_spread":0.23964460106009486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512878900","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0111676855,0.05536618,0.41292104,0.11280303,0.0021251214,0.00027357257,0.00021070297,0.00018706323,0.4049457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69024223,0.06907894,0.18598486,0.015923452,0.008540081,0.00088119664,0.00030049702,0.00026683466,0.02878191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98475504,0.008317594,0.0007488359,0.0021744394,0.0032086533,0.0007954496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717936,0.021059006,0.0015956056,0.0024527498,0.002164733,0.0009343511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025705663,0.0010295141,0.0015745109,0.008902459,0.0043076016,0.01947029,0.004917776,0.010180329,0.0063363966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02519323,0.0012770875,0.001869873,0.0061456654,0.079583995,0.037561193,0.006995699,0.0136935795,0.0011893758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017647457,0.0000045731695,0.00002923524,0.000022066677,0.0000016334044,0.000007741013,0.00024153187,0.0003758674,0.000007910264,0.9967726,0.0004254506,0.0021096945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039641973,0.0000034543948,0.00003507049,0.000077072014,0.0000011820994,0.000012268401,0.00013734214,0.000974098,0.000018797336,0.9827738,0.015956068,0.0000070036367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005109527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021446652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025705663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015905824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009837921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13594615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514055870","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1475350","title":"Litigant Resources and the Evolution of Legal Precedent","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.007474203044577429,"score_gpt":0.1884654832156042,"score_spread":0.18099128017102675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514055870","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8732003,0.0011681294,0.0034159173,0.0043591172,0.000026385678,0.000031818035,0.0002641898,0.000043006632,0.1174912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996572,0.00013207392,0.00022061467,0.00007362696,0.000013241614,0.0000057681964,0.00004134599,0.0000101422265,0.0029313427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975731,0.00092400017,0.00013130993,0.00034002992,0.00045151077,0.00058006984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95447546,0.030911932,0.005536518,0.0015608747,0.003079646,0.004435553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045773587,0.00011951831,0.00049577665,0.0024977732,0.0022923192,0.0070674014,0.0010707021,0.0023361547,0.02435388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05440626,0.0003909999,0.00026484873,0.0019154204,0.0037836437,0.0043339212,0.0025690554,0.0019691049,0.0014589494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057314086,0.00043421108,0.090474546,0.00010519078,0.00008943983,0.0016712359,0.01008754,0.015813744,0.0019600913,0.82917297,0.0071239416,0.042493846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015400295,0.00029063836,0.21598907,0.00016509662,0.000102215025,0.0007082427,0.013174048,0.019326737,0.0010989822,0.70554924,0.043313302,0.00012839407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009451697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017899474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02435388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040128767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030730243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08147186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1514215285","doi":"10.3386/w18608","title":"Misconduct in Credence Good Markets","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Credence; Misconduct; Credence good; Business; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Information asymmetry; Finance; Machine learning","score_opus":0.4779609404431299,"score_gpt":0.45603113901357667,"score_spread":0.021929801429553253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1514215285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85868526,0.0023217765,0.04434822,0.020803455,0.00020249552,0.00053752895,0.00062295963,0.00023952045,0.07223883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939387,0.00027594686,0.0015809896,0.00089210004,0.00013388188,0.00007921776,0.00006340661,0.000009769731,0.0030260007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753507,0.012075478,0.0012302705,0.0023827208,0.0048307674,0.004130036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7011207,0.20898788,0.06386831,0.010389567,0.00922726,0.006406344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036506563,0.0005075998,0.0013098733,0.0042440346,0.004778777,0.0062729875,0.0024721315,0.008287082,0.01436725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1644623,0.00061045267,0.0010720872,0.0031623195,0.008074799,0.012648152,0.0046257004,0.0045187757,0.001064884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069884397,0.00089273864,0.2545778,0.00034807448,0.00022675823,0.0073860832,0.0072909775,0.028733913,0.0009380121,0.59642994,0.02561246,0.07686448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047488193,0.00053821434,0.05425717,0.0003800994,0.00023484629,0.0036902493,0.005903284,0.14597332,0.0018703619,0.76352155,0.022883644,0.00027242387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006749141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045315432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036506563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041821646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043168725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19306749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516204379","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1280386","title":"What is a Gang and Why Does the Law Care?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.012959979195073074,"score_gpt":0.1945129483358382,"score_spread":0.18155296914076513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516204379","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16446935,0.0034051863,0.008796697,0.55861706,0.0020090714,0.000091312366,0.00040647708,0.00021885312,0.26198608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503986,0.002027796,0.0015654761,0.027911643,0.0011437479,0.00005274983,0.0001041156,0.00018519504,0.01661058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936459,0.0029417246,0.0001771223,0.0006197155,0.00090582675,0.001709772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755711,0.009463736,0.0032044635,0.0021184322,0.0031090465,0.0065332167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070006857,0.0002588397,0.00073500455,0.002668162,0.011948819,0.010462183,0.0012599642,0.006037504,0.021895897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051512975,0.00036152164,0.00046295626,0.0038440241,0.023055531,0.01172018,0.0049864813,0.0050543626,0.0029120136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088227884,0.00020454018,0.03955599,0.00011990447,0.000044565062,0.00061236275,0.016671956,0.00032154974,0.00011654281,0.7781186,0.102173366,0.061972387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049877835,0.000040805968,0.014557603,0.00041148806,0.000042645243,0.00072454644,0.040475443,0.0006187665,0.00011685047,0.8046588,0.13825248,0.000050788494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017995065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035051417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021895897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035850175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008334773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07324904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516702566","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.510","title":"Defeasibility in Judicial Opinion: Logical or Procedural?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Defeasible reasoning; Appeal; Dialectic; Argumentation theory; Adversarial system; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Variety (cybernetics); Judicial opinion; Subject (documents); Computer science; Defeasible estate; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10170842010581109,"score_gpt":0.2575299717280949,"score_spread":0.15582155162228378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516702566","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1123809,0.009408125,0.52291244,0.0919448,0.00095886376,0.00025334916,0.00022633058,0.0002975945,0.2616176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679741,0.0013883668,0.02326585,0.0026123098,0.0007141024,0.00016647877,0.0000803681,0.000068590816,0.0037297017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722453,0.014756577,0.002021709,0.0030815178,0.0061088237,0.001786176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9358347,0.04086811,0.008752144,0.007993517,0.005279718,0.0012718692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027645573,0.00061180454,0.0014471669,0.0030074397,0.0030063319,0.01264555,0.003253,0.009272362,0.0062842835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0780868,0.0007919355,0.0017026261,0.0024409206,0.04751887,0.02679223,0.005320206,0.009569598,0.0011903329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011025873,0.000013919917,0.00026700002,0.00004243273,0.000011078744,0.000062228115,0.0015360424,0.00016886921,0.00010677653,0.99469286,0.00028707465,0.0028006379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010939668,0.000012795952,0.00027237742,0.00006232757,0.000008041473,0.000076752876,0.0004753827,0.00062919204,0.00011006574,0.9953329,0.0029970706,0.0000120409595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009522408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070197403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027645573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033684706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027190256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14620548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518367613","doi":"","title":"Taking Specific Performance Seriously: Trumping Damages as the Presumptive Remedy for Breach of Contract","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Subject (documents); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economic shortage; Ideal (ethics); Legal profession; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.020669166934706343,"score_gpt":0.22800904239621086,"score_spread":0.2073398754615045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518367613","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1281054,0.0051732077,0.011037129,0.037702132,0.00044204056,0.00008852699,0.000082557555,0.00012586614,0.8172432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9582074,0.0016460529,0.001178102,0.0025931646,0.00018547416,0.000024968786,0.000030931704,0.00003831029,0.03609559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907323,0.0020275374,0.0002278698,0.0008074257,0.0036235969,0.0025812844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935928,0.0013654423,0.0006504787,0.0008900924,0.0023325158,0.0011685847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005422156,0.0008817897,0.00065423694,0.0026048645,0.009916632,0.011245069,0.0030396727,0.0062203463,0.00678745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013429152,0.0002733967,0.0005647808,0.002383992,0.042330276,0.005928534,0.0072806017,0.006598374,0.0010956676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004705927,0.000056530287,0.002276506,0.00008224434,0.00002050113,0.00048315927,0.0067220367,0.0015429669,0.00064925104,0.9471089,0.00956738,0.031443566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007539572,0.000543787,0.02999036,0.0017569101,0.00014783828,0.0010805068,0.029738102,0.0043182536,0.002555826,0.6079783,0.3215694,0.0002453856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19686757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3039584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19686757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028544549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022553302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39144337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520652679","doi":"","title":"Resource-full Giving","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hope College Digital Commons (Hope College)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.019679218308254837,"score_gpt":0.203402517293773,"score_spread":0.18372329898551817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1520652679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012813723,0.001096251,0.0020065655,0.01331714,0.0059318775,0.00016270077,0.00058413384,0.0010936061,0.97452635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00517529,0.00049934565,0.00071311224,0.0029718014,0.00044385495,0.00006397118,0.00025108745,0.00046818206,0.9894134],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778026,0.0007536205,0.00009354951,0.00024135794,0.000726906,0.00040438274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499726,0.0006693323,0.00016115302,0.00088184857,0.0013301295,0.0019602044],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020511446,0.0005912317,0.00056878186,0.0008430254,0.0059176376,0.008591503,0.0014773521,0.0021833624,0.7016604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013170538,0.00036661263,0.000521972,0.00094160164,0.001235319,0.00458896,0.009607379,0.003087105,0.4167706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023357758,0.00004271632,0.00017685426,0.00007153289,0.000001978829,0.0001361644,0.00092188583,0.00002408492,0.0001283719,0.011437593,0.9084859,0.07854968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017856654,0.000004946926,0.000093966584,0.000041672294,6.429487e-7,0.00007445408,0.0005099453,0.000012572158,0.000031274063,0.00084597035,0.99837947,0.0000032627786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026389307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007316002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7016604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017456375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032698633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42554522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522598280","doi":"","title":"Judicial Review Standards of American Private Administration and Its Revelation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Administration (probate law); Accountability; Public administration; Judicial review; Business; Political science; Face (sociological concept); Private law; Task (project management); Revelation; Law; Public law; Economics; Sociology; Management","score_opus":0.06648850943493374,"score_gpt":0.33312051920952407,"score_spread":0.26663200977459034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522598280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20028614,0.01045189,0.02521049,0.16111267,0.0011664536,0.00006646977,0.0003467254,0.00012816051,0.6012311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789169,0.001207542,0.0033408655,0.006096525,0.0006526693,0.000045152658,0.00004674568,0.00002010131,0.009673533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843881,0.0062474194,0.00080261496,0.00179432,0.005646652,0.0011207877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9596283,0.0158968,0.005805637,0.0037323777,0.01360514,0.001331686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017196715,0.00017247516,0.00033754905,0.0019988175,0.0039524967,0.00852263,0.0007849729,0.0035425592,0.0017934556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04556772,0.0003686357,0.0002922503,0.0019113098,0.011630445,0.0044169584,0.0019221187,0.0053582033,0.00030442953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009971226,0.000012405959,0.00082791783,0.000008036884,0.0000038023775,0.0000135811215,0.00078329234,0.00018925157,0.00007749799,0.98815477,0.004642757,0.0052768067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022283908,0.00004009283,0.012522668,0.00013169198,0.000020315305,0.0000744624,0.0010073936,0.0018062709,0.0005614264,0.85870486,0.12502934,0.00007917717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019353999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015156572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019353999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071818647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007630845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09094602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1525519862","doi":"","title":"EXPLORING ECONOMIC AND DEMOCRATIC THEORIES OF CIVIL LITIGATION: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL LITIGANTS IN THE DISPOSITION OF FEDERAL CIVIL CASES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Political science; Dispute resolution; Politics; Incentive; Democracy; Law; Law and economics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.03766660551527536,"score_gpt":0.2154742559124555,"score_spread":0.17780765039718013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1525519862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73128754,0.000981959,0.02070422,0.01922423,0.00009345444,0.0001994307,0.00008498046,0.000025978054,0.22739828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99573684,0.00022168795,0.0009068019,0.0005497242,0.00007235273,0.00006554614,0.000027498505,0.000010578016,0.0024088854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97542715,0.013147209,0.0006785362,0.0020192936,0.004561361,0.004166607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8866571,0.07937952,0.019200575,0.0043170275,0.005398292,0.005047471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026582692,0.0002717693,0.00065643666,0.0056765005,0.006599806,0.012437125,0.0024929743,0.0031309489,0.011140189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0943264,0.00047375791,0.0009881214,0.0031538594,0.026907496,0.01187194,0.005922473,0.004992054,0.0009137613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010712121,0.00044241242,0.03669581,0.000029403796,0.000038984697,0.00018197758,0.013878063,0.0019399966,0.00011546104,0.9349501,0.0011769732,0.0104437815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010541395,0.00011663989,0.055007286,0.00008315978,0.000032401775,0.00017203359,0.018644389,0.008750312,0.00026914055,0.9083215,0.008440567,0.00005708205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005916154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006408167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026582692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008634075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056850417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14058435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528323540","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1005415","title":"Legal Versus Normative Incentives Under Judicial Error","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Incentive; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02348740930141799,"score_gpt":0.24257162884452432,"score_spread":0.21908421954310633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528323540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6435873,0.0006850078,0.04475391,0.034255743,0.00034311047,0.0001753955,0.0002840157,0.00013195479,0.27578357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99553454,0.000092427115,0.0011555786,0.0006289133,0.00026792794,0.00003581491,0.000012201328,0.000011297208,0.0022612384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97412986,0.012882114,0.0013210023,0.0022941367,0.0051020132,0.004270904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82020754,0.12849198,0.022901904,0.010702664,0.011775036,0.005920948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032986466,0.00043096958,0.0011535517,0.0021189789,0.0025187812,0.008146036,0.0014841513,0.007294635,0.010900348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14639838,0.00050365593,0.00049777474,0.0011927787,0.009030549,0.007951975,0.0034773913,0.0046343654,0.0007482518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012714563,0.00011286748,0.0055022803,0.000046718666,0.000022403381,0.00010408792,0.00061991275,0.003270874,0.0003757448,0.9806491,0.0016582505,0.007510766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011989365,0.000064660446,0.0047498224,0.000038021233,0.00003070725,0.0000739131,0.0004904278,0.009150799,0.00036158855,0.9825554,0.0023393508,0.00002543721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019471963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020711154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032986466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027697734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044439407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17445117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1529966208","doi":"10.7202/015796ar","title":"Can Strikes Pay for Management?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Sanctions; Business; Salary; Incentive; Forcing (mathematics); Agency (philosophy); Work (physics); Revenue; Structuring; Collective bargaining; Revenue sharing; Investment (military); Law and economics; Industrial organization; Economics; Microeconomics; Market economy; Finance; Political science; Law; Engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.03989291401793531,"score_gpt":0.22743358856051088,"score_spread":0.18754067454257556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1529966208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01392288,0.0069841393,0.003288289,0.4452075,0.00599043,0.00003725844,0.000119511365,0.0001234233,0.52432656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70515716,0.0061271586,0.0014215637,0.07081062,0.0069078705,0.000094391406,0.00013630836,0.00012227485,0.20922254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99521315,0.0011347147,0.00015849918,0.0006765745,0.0013944197,0.0014225421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555826,0.0012663379,0.00064282195,0.00045499517,0.0008653217,0.0012123437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004057888,0.0004478197,0.00050408096,0.0012186064,0.0067782244,0.01603454,0.001616496,0.009597121,0.06574048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018524969,0.00031039945,0.00048764,0.001250478,0.007555568,0.01424814,0.0026158106,0.0079455,0.007936075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044835,0.00007163765,0.0015553477,0.0000485707,0.000012361378,0.00011558704,0.00089698436,0.00020266706,0.00005528274,0.8441608,0.12275011,0.030085767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032782256,0.000040469757,0.0028135364,0.00030805875,0.000011853565,0.00019266336,0.0037551168,0.00055298035,0.00010781874,0.6155726,0.37658128,0.00003092572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045208135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005490204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06574048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005852765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064927735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2199238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533113913","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1080.0905","title":"Optimal Auditing with Scoring: Theory and Application to Insurance Fraud","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Insurance fraud; Incentive; Deterrence theory; Reinsurance; Business; Actuarial science; Accounting; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.0191141656522235,"score_gpt":0.21661777995073128,"score_spread":0.19750361429850777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533113913","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030594636,0.0026008352,0.947321,0.0023838344,0.0001442757,0.0001472344,0.00008918371,0.0001182923,0.016600728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8494838,0.004581969,0.13787134,0.00043124644,0.0005708537,0.000319787,0.00012578044,0.00010149434,0.006513814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98950523,0.0069444287,0.00051979854,0.0008198264,0.0015466223,0.000663972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972727,0.020206457,0.0029688017,0.0016785251,0.0018129463,0.0006063862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009755128,0.0013586883,0.0028605831,0.0022118904,0.001286532,0.0036905643,0.0022854807,0.0032483726,0.0038614261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04234844,0.0011687407,0.0013484566,0.003742582,0.006615158,0.0042827385,0.0030534123,0.0034841546,0.0004041034],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036027028,0.00011169921,0.0014598833,0.00016968042,0.00005469847,0.00009251699,0.0002008187,0.19637235,0.00038586336,0.7703739,0.0014432012,0.029299442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030438552,0.000038844497,0.0003719303,0.0000584377,0.000014648656,0.000042369145,0.00005223077,0.3473853,0.00022205626,0.6505975,0.0011598689,0.000026353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003770773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017624375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009755128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004281958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034611418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05159068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533212645","doi":"10.3386/w11885","title":"Contractual Versus Generic Outsourcing: The Role of Proximity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Outsourcing; Business; Industrial organization; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.33384144102463775,"score_gpt":0.42286022114706145,"score_spread":0.0890187801224237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533212645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9523947,0.0010235544,0.004876409,0.0016093807,0.000016666963,0.000047893696,0.00024431178,0.00001301422,0.039773963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984394,0.00018825362,0.00030523844,0.000042597672,0.000012847696,0.00000799831,0.000044924833,0.0000029846428,0.0009557541],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978756,0.0008925898,0.00013342139,0.00028100543,0.00042324472,0.00039412273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761295,0.01061326,0.007861834,0.0014356418,0.0011863053,0.0027733988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017722853,0.00018557701,0.0004126996,0.0008230311,0.0014255499,0.0022665164,0.0006552265,0.0006223847,0.011934849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016966045,0.00015673706,0.0003643248,0.002204948,0.0023318643,0.0027559495,0.0029163223,0.00073330203,0.000540104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005894714,0.00029722872,0.77977055,0.00026532263,0.00016410279,0.0009224021,0.008054373,0.00793935,0.0013065978,0.14739174,0.002302902,0.050995965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012834901,0.00049903593,0.86355805,0.0002610212,0.00026861206,0.001454935,0.022060122,0.013560082,0.0012437872,0.082738325,0.014158202,0.00006947153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005798715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007546869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011934849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010922004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010251729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039926052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534041611","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-0155-1_15","title":"The Empirical Measure of Information Problems with Emphasis on Insurance Fraud and Dynamic Data","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse selection; Moral hazard; Causality (physics); Information asymmetry; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Margin (machine learning); Order (exchange); Residual; Risk analysis (engineering); Point (geometry); Economics; Incentive; Econometrics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Business; Algorithm; Mathematics; Finance","score_opus":0.07785999961188834,"score_gpt":0.22537244715079632,"score_spread":0.14751244753890796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534041611","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019932788,0.10171414,0.66533977,0.06413267,0.0017904881,0.0001920709,0.0017113592,0.00027008157,0.14491662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7130081,0.07665176,0.16465682,0.006148281,0.008360996,0.0006843956,0.0019200107,0.00026817323,0.02830149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924448,0.004043212,0.00048957847,0.0008570638,0.0019139214,0.00025152264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95546544,0.03669121,0.0028994814,0.0028267493,0.0016220232,0.00049507635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007877851,0.0011160595,0.001502822,0.008050529,0.0010695404,0.006576185,0.001977074,0.0031602927,0.005654458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05274837,0.0007500405,0.0008768293,0.010333013,0.009958335,0.014776722,0.0024348185,0.0057869395,0.0007139818],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059402882,0.000024720654,0.00082913897,0.0000953523,0.000019363903,0.000025949998,0.00009552331,0.0014375452,0.00004768067,0.9668464,0.00641304,0.0241594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002062163,0.000007260406,0.00068695616,0.0001135827,0.000008040263,0.00008563441,0.000058408343,0.0046946257,0.000088285946,0.9849377,0.009306039,0.000011420654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012133683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091254717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008050529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037937742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021772936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041662574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537858305","doi":"10.7202/029157ar","title":"The Role of Information Concerning the Arbitrator’s Preferences","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Preference; Selection (genetic algorithm); Function (biology); Computer science; Business; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Political science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.030180414752732126,"score_gpt":0.203482330972249,"score_spread":0.17330191621951688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537858305","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15048295,0.0045977384,0.6562828,0.025764266,0.0005663937,0.00019350427,0.0006639551,0.00021138947,0.16123693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712579,0.0016813499,0.021376843,0.00075694127,0.0006232411,0.00005665772,0.00012622053,0.00004501133,0.0040758094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.984405,0.009437376,0.00086242874,0.0016398503,0.0027264755,0.0009289193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83829665,0.1353551,0.0093760295,0.011143191,0.004610985,0.0012180973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027634058,0.0010413721,0.0016095517,0.0018159878,0.0018447529,0.010320595,0.002428302,0.004600997,0.008689817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115011394,0.00082838064,0.00095501967,0.0020374097,0.0063715386,0.021229392,0.0022542002,0.006578438,0.0010025926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029738544,0.000059043898,0.0017614069,0.0002335708,0.00009030429,0.0002957036,0.0009259378,0.0101197,0.0013095913,0.95837176,0.0008545226,0.025681034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006359716,0.00009932187,0.0011196431,0.00012290104,0.00006673072,0.00019393291,0.0002687033,0.017782731,0.001199917,0.9751794,0.0038502496,0.000052966003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008756325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063020375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027634058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017259857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015973047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14614457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540310812","doi":"","title":"Producing Law for Innovation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Production (economics); Corporate governance; State (computer science); Legal profession; Law and economics; Industrial organization; Law; Finance; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.045274284606030175,"score_gpt":0.27046958196535326,"score_spread":0.2251952973593231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540310812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066352854,0.0065161968,0.0834461,0.12592989,0.0029075858,0.00018789702,0.00026352922,0.00050467707,0.7736088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60436106,0.013904191,0.07524621,0.036459066,0.006618612,0.00070652,0.00064828666,0.00087457,0.26118153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926696,0.0024926604,0.0003178075,0.0014108643,0.0022822807,0.00082666933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98410034,0.0079928385,0.00091331446,0.0038504265,0.0022511298,0.000891956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011483522,0.0006364481,0.0007304278,0.0026757873,0.00545862,0.013460088,0.0019550463,0.0066352454,0.031713367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02914296,0.00046769972,0.0009882451,0.0016301296,0.019332258,0.014575249,0.00752847,0.008512977,0.0074322056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017499813,0.000006905111,0.00006877564,0.00002053617,0.0000026155012,0.000021444806,0.00026187013,0.00016862452,0.00004795598,0.9879677,0.0063765966,0.005055174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008467273,0.0000114450595,0.000114612965,0.00015631529,0.0000046229434,0.00003290174,0.0002770628,0.0004049444,0.00015851123,0.7783733,0.22044812,0.000009646433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044559375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037073095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031713367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00787065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011814963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1060918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548996593","doi":"","title":"The Role of International Law Firms and Multijural Legal Human Capital in the Harmonization of Legal Regimes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Harmonization; Adjudication; Business; Legal profession; Law and economics; Legal research; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.008154156965814865,"score_gpt":0.2071891489166676,"score_spread":0.19903499195085272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1548996593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.188685,0.0042957026,0.015204908,0.029906843,0.00015976178,0.0001672926,0.00007292014,0.00007968713,0.76142794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98769814,0.00088851963,0.0016145915,0.0014901625,0.000092365925,0.000044956778,0.000023882238,0.000014564224,0.008132827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916272,0.0030273765,0.00024007574,0.0010942046,0.0012353368,0.002775794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729795,0.012134402,0.005389787,0.0026458069,0.0017715585,0.005078891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010257898,0.00026682846,0.00041366968,0.0033702063,0.0074434173,0.025406284,0.0016616152,0.0041504456,0.014385945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018078338,0.00039208235,0.00033048904,0.0043928516,0.038827274,0.013693696,0.010685805,0.0053393138,0.0006510684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000132743635,0.000063100444,0.006344409,0.000019594698,0.000008847238,0.00013833577,0.00573098,0.00046999723,0.000059969658,0.97045916,0.0019096917,0.014782654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060590275,0.000108704364,0.02868411,0.0005397534,0.00003285276,0.00032554864,0.024849312,0.002061801,0.00043139415,0.7981019,0.14472455,0.000079452715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009552161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011182233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025406284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010221812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009507575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07416475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549137774","doi":"10.54648/eulr2011002","title":"Through the Legal Looking Glass: Exploring the Concept of Corporate Legal Strategy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Business Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Perspective (graphical); Order (exchange); Empirical legal studies; Competition (biology); Business; Legal opinion; Corporate law; Legal formalism; Law and economics; Management science; Political science; Law; Corporate governance; Economics; Computer science; Comparative law; Black letter law; Artificial intelligence; Private law","score_opus":0.1699171299259121,"score_gpt":0.2354142858891293,"score_spread":0.0654971559632172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549137774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1037469,0.012661612,0.113958485,0.05647932,0.0002986924,0.00014376386,0.000100660116,0.00009437449,0.7125161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757884,0.003170009,0.012066649,0.0014382257,0.00011817436,0.000099308294,0.00003896252,0.00004100274,0.007239292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620134,0.0021227764,0.00011089119,0.0003256626,0.00071031746,0.0005289687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941294,0.0036250995,0.000771783,0.00029974416,0.0006126437,0.00056137744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004647871,0.0005837234,0.000534201,0.0056055426,0.0047153607,0.0144329835,0.0016382625,0.004895284,0.005096703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008216872,0.00032491502,0.0006869461,0.0039939303,0.050334807,0.027987065,0.0062645744,0.0037427028,0.0004652827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013543486,0.0000030148803,0.00015908711,0.000009699546,8.996011e-7,0.000027840584,0.0016204765,0.00008203979,0.000028681667,0.99612033,0.00018142468,0.001765267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044201097,0.000013733857,0.00041194697,0.0001340288,0.0000035490104,0.000088367306,0.0064549507,0.0010140904,0.00006754724,0.97765315,0.014143848,0.000010301243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077057327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00629739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144329835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072461325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066709095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052574635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549839306","doi":"10.7202/019098ar","title":"Union Discourse and Perceived Violation of Contract","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Social contract; Psychological contract; Political science; Trade union; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Public relations; Politics; International trade","score_opus":0.041137396440634084,"score_gpt":0.229759006552013,"score_spread":0.18862161011137893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549839306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93867046,0.0008625737,0.0022728338,0.0033658557,0.00006534453,0.000035580873,0.000016799828,0.0000109308985,0.05469951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983291,0.00020341996,0.00022321034,0.000117870855,0.000013770009,0.000012708207,0.000007815931,0.000005799416,0.00108629],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98431474,0.011190034,0.00055533345,0.0007499373,0.0023244617,0.00086539635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97365475,0.01986674,0.0041450816,0.00066512375,0.00093313586,0.0007351563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013791149,0.000335283,0.00052333006,0.0029689316,0.012531637,0.011583175,0.0014100468,0.003437212,0.005499089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0320062,0.00033113812,0.0003011238,0.002420057,0.017498273,0.0099466685,0.0074993744,0.0038657496,0.00027511906],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005272802,0.00025162759,0.009582654,0.00012482477,0.000008867272,0.00059458014,0.8596298,0.00017225588,0.00088638574,0.121724434,0.00037318323,0.006598654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019730449,0.000120411285,0.008913823,0.00031232636,0.000013378865,0.0003792392,0.9518181,0.00077181746,0.00069204706,0.014664076,0.022259315,0.000035708836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005789409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032573643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013791149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065016355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002858405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555729158","doi":"10.7202/1091877ar","title":"Professional Liability Insurance Contracts: Claims Made Versus Occurrence Policies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Liability insurance; Cover (algebra); Insurance policy; Liability; Actuarial science; Business; Casualty insurance; Insurance law; General insurance; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.09433209518358211,"score_gpt":0.29448867575142906,"score_spread":0.20015658056784696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555729158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41556716,0.005778132,0.37990347,0.028969457,0.00033027428,0.00018505396,0.0005024611,0.00013625856,0.16862771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867604,0.00096818176,0.008274543,0.00037921523,0.00017030445,0.00003574115,0.000043722248,0.000009705769,0.0033581774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99095726,0.0038061952,0.00052811543,0.00095612434,0.0028235945,0.00092868746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.961311,0.025596527,0.008273458,0.0024134174,0.0014198333,0.0009858271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008677688,0.00033007655,0.0004821996,0.000877202,0.0013546655,0.0047020796,0.0012671623,0.004143868,0.0046653687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03410813,0.0004148271,0.0005029742,0.0009957165,0.00661215,0.007001213,0.0016497745,0.0035179683,0.00036167313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042904227,0.000031282685,0.0030027397,0.000037583643,0.000011831768,0.0001048215,0.00035332888,0.003857292,0.00028749416,0.9845738,0.00043647978,0.0072604897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056303157,0.00012601251,0.005431314,0.00015044892,0.000048017668,0.00047144617,0.00072804745,0.018666618,0.0009354633,0.95936084,0.013982591,0.000042932195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015265311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010875206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008677688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022523531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023508049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045892537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557750293","doi":"10.1002/9781118785317.weom110075","title":"Psychological Contract Theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley Encyclopedia of Management","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological contract; Core (optical fiber); Social exchange theory; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Positive economics; Epistemology; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023545255376919344,"score_gpt":0.23634326308705028,"score_spread":0.21279800771013094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557750293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022591444,0.004627142,0.11243438,0.025422344,0.00026742503,0.0001748382,0.00041239025,0.00007505627,0.83399487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384755,0.004766557,0.014051915,0.0022300119,0.0003988231,0.00030173655,0.00033475057,0.00004037833,0.039400306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977984,0.0011624646,0.00007965708,0.00022580453,0.00056354987,0.00017008507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960465,0.00239293,0.0003478062,0.00041944953,0.00043472747,0.00035868047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027354052,0.00043456256,0.00044367102,0.0014578729,0.0020592434,0.0051123733,0.0012714543,0.0025709916,0.022455085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00809231,0.00023788055,0.00043316506,0.0019409751,0.00798877,0.0044070636,0.001818381,0.0031754193,0.0016670608],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020973655,0.0000073201204,0.00008291814,0.000011489169,0.0000020523842,0.000010765803,0.00014742745,0.00024545184,0.000007654495,0.99558544,0.0011838314,0.0027134153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063627235,0.0000040478967,0.00015566495,0.000039439834,0.000002263141,0.00004799262,0.00016644411,0.001016963,0.00001152037,0.9873996,0.011146888,0.0000028391398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025815866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001259257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022455085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040266775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025012458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07511979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560467452","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.393041","title":"Cooperation Without Enforcement? A Comparative Analysis of Litigation and Online Reputation as Quality Assurance Mechanisms","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Enforcement; Business; Quality (philosophy); Litigation risk analysis; Adverse selection; Information asymmetry; The Internet; Industrial organization; Internet privacy; Microeconomics; Actuarial science; Economics; Computer science; Accounting; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.03128624319879508,"score_gpt":0.2819696752269296,"score_spread":0.25068343202813453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560467452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7390966,0.008097323,0.027232245,0.015191831,0.00011178919,0.00023719619,0.00025872863,0.00010986594,0.20966442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957141,0.0005321534,0.00062959996,0.00018282064,0.000055703575,0.000022668546,0.000022429762,0.000010481124,0.0028299848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840986,0.009318736,0.00042354641,0.00088433694,0.0020493432,0.0032254332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8387615,0.11180125,0.028848294,0.008998132,0.0075487983,0.0040420606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021673054,0.00043524327,0.0012643214,0.003624231,0.0023589423,0.010447407,0.0023348383,0.005009683,0.022082845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0566506,0.0005054108,0.0014141222,0.0036223927,0.0069305827,0.013947221,0.0032542262,0.0032379231,0.0009792215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010805385,0.0005751635,0.026134675,0.00034918264,0.00024409145,0.0004616254,0.0029926554,0.011082391,0.0010919813,0.9106987,0.0036458683,0.04164312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014201402,0.00246627,0.11136417,0.0009471637,0.0017804845,0.001466449,0.02199385,0.10193748,0.0033668692,0.7248668,0.028148703,0.00024163167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056222035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004899616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022082845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004213899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049715936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114619434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564539901","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1001247","title":"Chief Judges: The Limits of Attitudinal Theory and Possible Paradox of Managerial Judging","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Positive economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.017680112401266795,"score_gpt":0.2293518782511542,"score_spread":0.2116717658498874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564539901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26816556,0.0040312223,0.051679388,0.29350078,0.0010190859,0.000072354174,0.00032363678,0.00015136565,0.38105658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896115,0.00036222406,0.00290995,0.004404817,0.00053428183,0.000043758304,0.00002577629,0.000026547335,0.0020811285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988744,0.0067877616,0.0003314479,0.0012945931,0.0021141726,0.0007280017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9163329,0.061611664,0.0052554016,0.006963464,0.007466141,0.0023704243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022575991,0.00030007516,0.0010319164,0.0022023406,0.0038863327,0.007821478,0.0027101042,0.0060512833,0.009057901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08974632,0.0005113064,0.0005022565,0.0024412922,0.020680413,0.012494952,0.0030798072,0.0063149747,0.00084765983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039864946,0.000048919166,0.0012946358,0.00003348763,0.00001030618,0.000038970342,0.0020358162,0.00027602492,0.00006874101,0.98636043,0.0033761857,0.006416649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038582744,0.000008342608,0.001090167,0.00002234517,0.000006188589,0.000024289871,0.00074466394,0.0011924705,0.00004724233,0.9945714,0.0022438064,0.000010574214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003611719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030962375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022575991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002724909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027805693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11939466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1571714362","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2205723","title":"L'analyse économique du droit comme outil du raisonnement juridique (Law and Economics as a Legal Scholarship and Lawyering Tool)","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Scholarship; Humanities; Economics; Philosophy; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.019010277886577324,"score_gpt":0.20438850001933492,"score_spread":0.1853782221327576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571714362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31033528,0.07427275,0.20418411,0.07809368,0.0019599602,0.00023950664,0.0050643343,0.00036376636,0.3254867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8464961,0.02489255,0.014701809,0.0011277569,0.0028261305,0.00020023425,0.0007888773,0.00019348122,0.10877302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722725,0.0012258822,0.0000797472,0.00041430106,0.00072559813,0.0003270948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913195,0.006970102,0.00056329207,0.0002760222,0.0006176784,0.00025337024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031322397,0.0005971874,0.0012642985,0.004655848,0.0015769252,0.0119616445,0.0012395516,0.0023966783,0.022627011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010907537,0.0008451363,0.0016273514,0.0053109704,0.0029350172,0.007235966,0.0012896826,0.0045347237,0.001718829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039566312,0.00005949046,0.0051788418,0.00014990213,0.00006676914,0.00015196345,0.0006598166,0.012421708,0.0003351191,0.9504066,0.007906948,0.022623248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059862094,0.00010246496,0.065825924,0.00071817107,0.00014525563,0.00045963368,0.0030489352,0.08255978,0.0012664971,0.66380787,0.18186645,0.00013918048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10092355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07107557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10092355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0096537955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069957576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20067221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572606151","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511493782","title":"Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Impact","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.026793109818710033,"score_gpt":0.2044275991181571,"score_spread":0.17763448929944708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572606151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08182075,0.041422624,0.0029120047,0.023214867,0.00044631708,0.00005609461,0.000091663904,0.000071384304,0.8499643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96039516,0.011688909,0.00076553045,0.0028807397,0.0010250174,0.000044700606,0.00004673865,0.00004721433,0.023105927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97220516,0.01220849,0.00067339785,0.0013405737,0.010933621,0.002638835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9408756,0.040270653,0.005667658,0.0023218757,0.0080766585,0.0027876114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010472668,0.0002912923,0.0005495308,0.0035755902,0.0026238458,0.010155886,0.00085911993,0.0018087573,0.006010925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040779386,0.00034898365,0.0003172646,0.0041158474,0.010274536,0.0031002199,0.0024809097,0.002498164,0.00093088753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005439748,0.00012606596,0.006027825,0.00016461195,0.00004195501,0.000107263666,0.0024382991,0.0028989434,0.00044465048,0.8900295,0.013150972,0.0845156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011887448,0.00027767284,0.07714799,0.001384552,0.00010057419,0.0002708848,0.004865742,0.0050602905,0.0013603945,0.54811674,0.36117908,0.00011704255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006574556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072312984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010472668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009101424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006863505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06603575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1572617883","doi":"10.29173/alr2671","title":"Lawyers as Quasi-Public Actors","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology","score_opus":0.043970958973925924,"score_gpt":0.243850150136912,"score_spread":0.19987919116298608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1572617883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10296013,0.005009014,0.06650289,0.09251265,0.0005292748,0.00029747756,0.00016713735,0.0003640054,0.7316574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87428457,0.0023801613,0.005781291,0.0069910344,0.00047030105,0.00018368506,0.00009699704,0.000064507934,0.10974757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924488,0.0037385763,0.00017500835,0.0008865301,0.001254267,0.0014968008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992388,0.003922128,0.0010070951,0.0010322636,0.00071250065,0.00093792885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004762282,0.0001847969,0.00029373358,0.0011219489,0.00416854,0.012994052,0.0011001617,0.0045482656,0.015051462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064897235,0.0007885423,0.00031469407,0.001091766,0.011286089,0.0071288394,0.0026706439,0.004751263,0.0025619795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005642054,0.000029067534,0.0005564115,0.000016714543,0.000003689142,0.00003855357,0.0010014628,0.00022491414,0.000081193866,0.9888361,0.0049766866,0.0042294953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008262946,0.00005241735,0.0020987636,0.00014548964,0.000032661625,0.00013088633,0.0036474734,0.0024906597,0.00037216768,0.59448844,0.3964371,0.000021103904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0102310395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014532964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015051462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0095322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008630137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06916124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573667871","doi":"","title":"Offer-of-Judgment Rules and Civil Litigation: An Empirical Study of Automobile Insurance Litigation in the East","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civil litigation; Obstacle; Civil procedure; Law; Dispute resolution; State (computer science); American rule; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Litigation risk analysis; Summary judgment; Actuarial science; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Accounting; Computer science; Audit","score_opus":0.028039501374998076,"score_gpt":0.22638451264123888,"score_spread":0.1983450112662408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573667871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981184,0.00016942169,0.00009915775,0.00015841646,0.0000014639631,0.0000102067615,0.00002205493,0.000001151342,0.0014197226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990188,0.00022360987,0.00008214819,0.00005137213,0.000005940741,0.000005100972,0.00003489933,0.0000014405292,0.0005766889],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795353,0.00075078633,0.00019823706,0.00014260462,0.00038907066,0.00056588347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96026236,0.023647107,0.012857328,0.00082348956,0.0011744818,0.0012352484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003657293,0.0001908936,0.0006301969,0.0017480172,0.0018145874,0.00262286,0.0008539472,0.001224484,0.0026042403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012168107,0.00028697663,0.00034169664,0.0019727496,0.00269328,0.0021857396,0.0012774245,0.002349633,0.0004883477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063399895,0.0022485123,0.92367405,0.00017145068,0.00025959284,0.0016355524,0.015877957,0.004156089,0.0011967274,0.025919143,0.0017898467,0.022437096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007311068,0.00047921232,0.9451009,0.00011836134,0.00015247239,0.00043735097,0.035936985,0.010137039,0.0010753386,0.003660615,0.0027828224,0.00004575293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03909714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07379168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03909714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039724885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017990883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07773912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1574485010","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1121006","title":"Understanding High Skill Worker Productivity Using Random Case Assignment in a Public Defender's Office","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Labour economics; Business; Operations management; Computer science; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.07629286784911572,"score_gpt":0.23828412914593894,"score_spread":0.16199126129682323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1574485010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95652187,0.00015986156,0.03259555,0.0020377703,0.000029944886,0.00007418396,0.00019279656,0.00006612925,0.008321699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99769646,0.000033674896,0.001488256,0.00005897247,0.000024727517,0.000017576323,0.00004085706,0.000005168667,0.0006343017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706584,0.0015968864,0.000096192045,0.00047791394,0.00025713493,0.0005060876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94061595,0.048597008,0.004983061,0.0027648516,0.0013535343,0.0016855823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00884104,0.00032483696,0.00075346266,0.0012396489,0.0012058337,0.0030572468,0.0016413375,0.0019142231,0.009818789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06378155,0.00045203546,0.00040005922,0.0012027634,0.001820494,0.0027570403,0.0015593776,0.0015557093,0.0008553068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023226584,0.0029141041,0.45168078,0.00020487283,0.00020726114,0.00093361794,0.006475027,0.08315034,0.0024160384,0.2921832,0.0073214336,0.1501907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035482968,0.000525448,0.13479957,0.000058702804,0.00012363985,0.00023398122,0.0050206576,0.33687627,0.001318077,0.51807326,0.0025598723,0.00005564446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063797003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044423207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009818789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016101227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010292218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046756446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577579068","doi":"10.7202/1027857ar","title":"André Bélanger, Théorisations sur le droit des contrats. Propositions exploratoires, Québec, Les Presses de l’Université Laval, 2014, 253 p., ISBN 978-2-7637-2115-6.","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012839241545621745,"score_gpt":0.17648310052159422,"score_spread":0.16364385897597247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577579068","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008070059,0.87240976,0.0041682757,0.054555953,0.0029426392,0.000031352905,0.000608573,0.00013281894,0.06434364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061821043,0.7262589,0.0057822573,0.012168243,0.0033213848,0.00012911031,0.0012035731,0.0004642901,0.1888513],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696004,0.00092178123,0.00014255183,0.00045750267,0.0012313788,0.0002868733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960389,0.0020900408,0.00022527548,0.00015262875,0.0012901055,0.00020308727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002560261,0.0021093576,0.0015084781,0.0042910716,0.004888773,0.0061995997,0.0024901254,0.0055593043,0.032810524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005327238,0.001126606,0.00092904276,0.007523014,0.006286031,0.00962688,0.0015900908,0.005025919,0.010808865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006555477,0.000038154816,0.00055452733,0.0009304962,0.000050145863,0.0001796493,0.003340884,0.0006590876,0.00018277304,0.210129,0.726281,0.057588812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023591809,0.000010269842,0.0018116817,0.0013872904,0.000021467768,0.00018962384,0.0011995287,0.00044241585,0.00024849703,0.09546403,0.8991329,0.00006877328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44982818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48254275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9694415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030558506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011783833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8944198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580989678","doi":"","title":"Hospitality Law : Managing Legal Issues in the Hospitality Industry","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hospitality; Hospitality industry; Business; Law; Law and economics; Public relations; Marketing; Political science; Sociology; Tourism","score_opus":0.028599403154318675,"score_gpt":0.23162599572894296,"score_spread":0.2030265925746243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580989678","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041763405,0.17328496,0.012358579,0.525388,0.012077732,0.0006563129,0.00015157508,0.0008218704,0.27108455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08410685,0.21291701,0.034205593,0.11421226,0.011510109,0.00097582367,0.00067266717,0.0005657853,0.5408339],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905839,0.0037608647,0.00050458685,0.00047601393,0.0038933302,0.0007812858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98416024,0.005110795,0.0012799837,0.00047652252,0.006837056,0.0021355157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012012895,0.00052321784,0.00036572755,0.00262995,0.0082666045,0.014130695,0.0024429765,0.009486636,0.018223204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015728597,0.00063112285,0.00039008254,0.0025737884,0.005498101,0.011813215,0.004921936,0.0072372262,0.0062635033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059920008,0.00007539411,0.00038266825,0.0005332044,0.000003791146,0.00017111484,0.0046596667,0.00025887307,0.000281166,0.10312869,0.74851435,0.14198504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002219233,0.000015149879,0.00047397468,0.00082177325,0.000002229494,0.000113592556,0.002999882,0.00006282385,0.0001464291,0.008911996,0.98643804,0.000011878342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013133898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025276512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018223204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01153775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028835503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08371258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582358884","doi":"10.1023/a:1010792810713","title":"Private/Public Interest and the Enforcement of a Code of Professional Conduct","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Public interest; Quality of Life Research; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Accounting; Ethical code; Association (psychology); Public relations; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.21375891687387655,"score_gpt":0.3039536476983818,"score_spread":0.09019473082450524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582358884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2812455,0.0014544039,0.056948747,0.14539327,0.0004459159,0.00034360285,0.000168964,0.000074753276,0.5139248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98973036,0.00015681707,0.00284124,0.0024369126,0.00016998274,0.000092332826,0.000019913738,0.000021535066,0.0045308787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9579555,0.023460934,0.0027822817,0.0030228295,0.0075174994,0.005261007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.734216,0.1964164,0.02468851,0.017309235,0.020446308,0.0069235386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04693632,0.00033286883,0.00094307365,0.0024726044,0.008635863,0.011207558,0.0015594095,0.014909935,0.005102645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14918917,0.0006617463,0.00075944007,0.001479037,0.03239128,0.006765594,0.004293935,0.011289479,0.0006067502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049950173,0.00010355011,0.0023216344,0.000015511032,0.000014326901,0.000095600844,0.0022703533,0.00055289624,0.00012708017,0.9879353,0.0021932486,0.004320464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006359528,0.000032074688,0.0030276328,0.000074871336,0.000020076097,0.000081736114,0.0014212793,0.0022133973,0.00024444237,0.9854248,0.007365783,0.00003026201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012210478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013691673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04693632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074920324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020817267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24822593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582636031","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1820878","title":"Privatized Firms, Rule of Law and Labor Outcomes in Emerging Markets","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Business; Labour law; Labour economics; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.011164814218006044,"score_gpt":0.22406546770311203,"score_spread":0.21290065348510598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582636031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99591297,0.00030857514,0.00020547795,0.0016296606,0.000011177678,0.000009649869,0.0001445933,0.000004546011,0.0017733396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928075,0.00010866926,0.000013084503,0.000068450034,0.00002034899,0.0000028436705,0.000065622604,0.0000011533788,0.00043905745],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992964,0.00018627234,0.000055740275,0.0000846952,0.00007633681,0.00030051608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9693797,0.012356659,0.013191447,0.0006891505,0.00086203276,0.0035210066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023484295,0.00013523988,0.0005430911,0.0008724594,0.0012399417,0.0036948693,0.0005826012,0.001807118,0.01094987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013142776,0.00018151446,0.00025436003,0.0012716928,0.0022359905,0.0027002222,0.001375724,0.0022970669,0.0004856088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009920945,0.0015470817,0.9245316,0.00006772697,0.00016128128,0.0010763996,0.001638768,0.006026627,0.0006255344,0.047319286,0.0030230393,0.012990572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002853194,0.000408854,0.89714104,0.000073796225,0.000100566656,0.00023779337,0.0049144477,0.009242982,0.00042720433,0.08506853,0.0020506748,0.00004867633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0114537515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017922707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0114537515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012016292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019860466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036630988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586054226","doi":"","title":"Optimal Assignment of Liabilities","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Damages; Constraint (computer-aided design); Generalization; Incentive; Strict liability; Accident (philosophy); Limited liability; Tort; Business; American rule; Economics; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Engineering; Law; Finance; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05041936219517778,"score_gpt":0.2794469809212644,"score_spread":0.22902761872608662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586054226","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25316578,0.0009931505,0.6509736,0.0040716296,0.00026347148,0.00035942922,0.0004817774,0.0004973796,0.08919376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93630016,0.00042046697,0.04910926,0.00027164558,0.00008839435,0.00017859078,0.00014137774,0.000076879674,0.013413202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981021,0.0007482539,0.00011707048,0.00034672167,0.00029655022,0.0003893324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968092,0.0014803349,0.00043916478,0.00045628363,0.0003239489,0.0004910695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025624975,0.00084522046,0.0012719404,0.000901223,0.00070811727,0.0026253622,0.0016386384,0.0022919779,0.010156083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013955107,0.000625133,0.00050260755,0.0006738507,0.0015036688,0.0031059182,0.0020792957,0.0016598215,0.0010835174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029349027,0.00031225834,0.0012192032,0.00017881845,0.00005402314,0.00030094112,0.00022081414,0.3384376,0.0028932174,0.5885425,0.008087101,0.059459955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009487174,0.000115442446,0.0006637263,0.000053276373,0.000021322552,0.00011397961,0.00012976225,0.5326419,0.0011377544,0.46028638,0.0047144694,0.000027112526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011207451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085586024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010156083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018300009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014804059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03397554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589022380","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2159599","title":"The Intended and Collateral Effects of Short-Sale Bans as a Regulatory Tool","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Collateral; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.011970249695756111,"score_gpt":0.1895012985401468,"score_spread":0.1775310488443907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589022380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53614914,0.002708039,0.069135524,0.011350895,0.00040686884,0.00031607237,0.0007717509,0.00043249005,0.37872916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861059,0.00041148148,0.001331432,0.00040641442,0.0002549785,0.00004367446,0.000046224017,0.000039643743,0.011360284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900727,0.004858593,0.00056374795,0.0011719911,0.002273584,0.0010594153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8555357,0.106019944,0.018045848,0.010614676,0.0066913688,0.0030924072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012806913,0.0007876149,0.0018185092,0.0020697922,0.0020918904,0.007566481,0.0026279294,0.0068278993,0.032085374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07327817,0.00080873066,0.0013011489,0.0014907229,0.008645179,0.010656099,0.002938821,0.007306948,0.001311142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045844822,0.00044939457,0.007269706,0.000143932,0.00008926013,0.0003636467,0.00042800553,0.008168528,0.001980356,0.96447265,0.002716054,0.013459934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003101575,0.0006849865,0.0146232145,0.00013108857,0.0003962266,0.0002774145,0.00046190247,0.025536206,0.001899495,0.9494981,0.006068638,0.00011246163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026193336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044989586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032085374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024845873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10733634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591084255","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.653184","title":"Environmental Liability for Transboundary Harms: Law and Forum Choice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Environmental law; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.010701406617316705,"score_gpt":0.20054568232214104,"score_spread":0.18984427570482434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591084255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4498586,0.0027284285,0.09725538,0.050973754,0.00031365213,0.00013789689,0.00032704114,0.00010774752,0.39829755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903964,0.00029964987,0.0012343813,0.00050172384,0.00016481584,0.00003259694,0.000024068784,0.0000100999305,0.007336314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922575,0.0042985934,0.000326414,0.0006718128,0.0012574627,0.0011881538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94050443,0.050174594,0.0029453696,0.0021587433,0.0022379279,0.001978835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011427574,0.0003581504,0.0008473138,0.0019139579,0.0029943786,0.008288411,0.0014336201,0.010896652,0.023013342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05457563,0.0004462894,0.0006930184,0.0011949553,0.006186757,0.009725564,0.003494756,0.0047973087,0.00089372107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006597883,0.00008539346,0.0016500863,0.000025276104,0.000018048142,0.00010592611,0.0004357574,0.0030861201,0.00017220745,0.98622024,0.002780251,0.005354693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028551834,0.000025551995,0.0011841508,0.000027470865,0.000017720698,0.00007030174,0.00046532514,0.005486144,0.00012627177,0.9901362,0.0024142235,0.00001810008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030330184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043067816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023013342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024927147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023140868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076987326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593176474","doi":"10.1023/a:1015144713068","title":"Environmental Regulations Under Simple Negligence or Strict Liability","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental and Resource Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.024794737282179888,"score_gpt":0.17619396021889772,"score_spread":0.15139922293671781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593176474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49254924,0.0027453315,0.06779886,0.019300427,0.00090330356,0.00027232335,0.0005171267,0.0002157528,0.4156977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98517865,0.00044243343,0.003208277,0.0032551177,0.00032120533,0.00007459089,0.00005367869,0.000010449227,0.007455591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98781013,0.0029249704,0.0010817845,0.001665709,0.004290304,0.0022270014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831676,0.008770626,0.0038413696,0.002641394,0.0011371766,0.00044181713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006584589,0.00036920048,0.00083064364,0.0012537248,0.0015225433,0.0040060235,0.00095367804,0.0042655077,0.0028919862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025662992,0.0003823566,0.0011758942,0.0006736369,0.009332804,0.0032012584,0.0021920404,0.0021903818,0.00035540338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005124802,0.00004182355,0.0027525602,0.000063525884,0.000059330767,0.00017941972,0.00032075745,0.00191396,0.00065071095,0.9836812,0.002680677,0.0076047205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049021204,0.00009276809,0.0056386343,0.00006577885,0.00009094421,0.00023461923,0.00024017115,0.004085899,0.0007448728,0.9809905,0.0077264654,0.000040428047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033926682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044090413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006584589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014943627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032996063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596394049","doi":"10.22004/ag.econ.12888","title":"APPROPRIATE REMEDIES FOR NON-TRADE CONCERNS","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Université Laval","keywords":"Business; International trade","score_opus":0.0498210843129761,"score_gpt":0.22462994579586174,"score_spread":0.17480886148288563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596394049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07579698,0.0033548991,0.16638336,0.2340622,0.005760481,0.0009615197,0.00057985313,0.0014637143,0.511637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86158854,0.0011038011,0.035272833,0.022912832,0.002968879,0.00039128202,0.00013105143,0.00032845655,0.075302176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845968,0.0032427115,0.001162907,0.0022510607,0.006595116,0.002151483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96475804,0.013935374,0.0033723349,0.0094017275,0.00751614,0.00101632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0121945,0.0007251398,0.0010667788,0.0026340017,0.0047013275,0.0071731964,0.0033969223,0.014782943,0.026424693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10088468,0.00064641365,0.001211029,0.0009997688,0.0042580445,0.007431168,0.0032412692,0.010305464,0.0023228962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054506534,0.00016669172,0.0012184731,0.00011014099,0.00004173422,0.0008637649,0.00079726195,0.0011721088,0.0012271113,0.9386172,0.031139325,0.024591586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011249538,0.00006700847,0.0018017363,0.00026322968,0.00010084982,0.00060315273,0.0011649565,0.0070019118,0.0025623227,0.8605094,0.12574594,0.00006702221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023208614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042284243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026424693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00220639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007525165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08839947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598304666","doi":"10.7202/602287ar","title":"Dissuader le crime : un survol","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.043328454137785466,"score_gpt":0.22446489139505735,"score_spread":0.18113643725727188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598304666","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024181308,0.25199017,0.20998007,0.2935145,0.009871302,0.00019139098,0.0005017819,0.00024239595,0.2095271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42722452,0.28286374,0.10490468,0.03213523,0.027636519,0.0006197094,0.00046144266,0.0006732308,0.12348092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891538,0.00667398,0.00030266686,0.0011150818,0.002258815,0.00049560424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746312,0.019,0.00071460503,0.0019614669,0.0032347173,0.00045798835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015899064,0.0011994308,0.0014500853,0.003893587,0.0039408035,0.008441056,0.002133567,0.004502306,0.013754587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035036545,0.00070133444,0.0011898029,0.0031253297,0.015622039,0.009895979,0.004208386,0.0068043144,0.002353215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105639745,0.00007463982,0.002353725,0.00050419924,0.00008558885,0.00014563445,0.002033888,0.001990604,0.00019596324,0.7829322,0.03570812,0.17386983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003468446,0.000101848644,0.003009897,0.0013942233,0.00007958782,0.00052124704,0.0024635214,0.0060009877,0.00070020685,0.6745243,0.31110546,0.0000640903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009816619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0123570915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015899064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059384624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08408326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598539745","doi":"10.1023/a:1013628803560","title":"Does More Deterrence Require More Punishment? [or Should the Punishment Fit the Crime?]","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Law and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Lambton College","funders":"","keywords":"Ceteris paribus; Deterrence (psychology); Economics; Punishment (psychology); Enforcement; Deterrence theory; Public finance; Microeconomics; Incentive; Public economics; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Macroeconomics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09253785480060486,"score_gpt":0.24327480637948773,"score_spread":0.15073695157888287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598539745","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19045652,0.003634542,0.026149293,0.6645201,0.002470218,0.0001555585,0.0020141597,0.0002052585,0.11039429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8998142,0.0021687553,0.0063503147,0.08345588,0.0021388645,0.00011487446,0.00034359508,0.000086126725,0.0055273604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628735,0.0011402315,0.00026010096,0.0009664688,0.00061339623,0.0007323605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725127,0.011616232,0.009527738,0.0019180925,0.0033953362,0.0010299535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005658073,0.0004098543,0.0015165838,0.0008314046,0.0015527199,0.0033480583,0.0019228038,0.008205179,0.020543441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050792933,0.00038193804,0.00083241134,0.0012335959,0.007902587,0.009964138,0.0010930304,0.0040009944,0.0017071945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025084388,0.00024888202,0.016427398,0.00051643356,0.00029789185,0.00031733565,0.0006686644,0.0016753245,0.0007055744,0.910145,0.04394476,0.024801847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016431362,0.0001315497,0.037312813,0.00013608055,0.00010718993,0.0003389044,0.0013167611,0.0028262434,0.0005045076,0.94085664,0.016218526,0.000086516535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008579468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0109715955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020543441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016725305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033920798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06872463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599027253","doi":"","title":"Civil Rights in Ordinary Tort Cases: Race, Gender, and the Calculation of Economic Loss","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Loyola of Los Angeles law review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Damages; Race (biology); Tort; Personal injury; Civil rights; Compensation (psychology); Political science; Law; Tort reform; Critical race theory; Sociology; Racism; Gender studies; Psychology; Liability; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03129577137770614,"score_gpt":0.24995937433695262,"score_spread":0.21866360295924647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599027253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7033315,0.009325566,0.07431999,0.026660256,0.0004639117,0.0001487265,0.0001424589,0.000060043963,0.18554752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923228,0.0007496594,0.0037696122,0.0005317493,0.00015574798,0.000029261444,0.000021684025,0.000014828936,0.0024045364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99165195,0.0044668163,0.00027627204,0.00032018544,0.0027060192,0.0005786811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861568,0.009658688,0.0016781755,0.0008495921,0.0013100904,0.00034669836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010531307,0.00032168056,0.00053730275,0.0031741867,0.0016552765,0.00449658,0.000895654,0.0010983878,0.0027238436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04731441,0.0002415186,0.00046464754,0.0018771341,0.0096331835,0.0045150705,0.0028137083,0.0017319948,0.0002956187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012968373,0.00008491859,0.08400748,0.00006381038,0.000060276852,0.0005090079,0.002957663,0.004086155,0.0002985997,0.83232695,0.003476121,0.07199935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003116099,0.00015892355,0.098799616,0.00042457646,0.00007340086,0.00093297363,0.005259082,0.01754112,0.0013363129,0.8497218,0.025654834,0.00006627099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059161484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008687341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010531307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032788257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017770657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055695534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1600236236","doi":"10.1002/9780470391341.ch8","title":"Frequency and Severity with Coverage Modifications","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley series in probability and statistics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Inflation (cosmology); Economics; Physics; Theoretical physics","score_opus":0.023120838375207276,"score_gpt":0.20401358696650276,"score_spread":0.18089274859129548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1600236236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.529039,0.0074222726,0.01785635,0.00716489,0.0013106231,0.00037527664,0.039029352,0.00081760634,0.3969846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94308615,0.0015529867,0.002800032,0.00030476303,0.0010586885,0.00006982428,0.0072087375,0.00017815943,0.043740764],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952584,0.00067297695,0.0005766271,0.0005948365,0.002533332,0.00036385804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764232,0.0117973415,0.0065210382,0.0021503947,0.0023097852,0.00079829065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019634138,0.00034188954,0.0005438101,0.0036479533,0.0004536086,0.002853199,0.0008778166,0.0005340053,0.05411432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036655698,0.00019079624,0.0007447053,0.0043077185,0.00062571926,0.0025611024,0.0013367451,0.0015525321,0.005803751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085164234,0.00036640314,0.4238271,0.00041327515,0.00041441736,0.0006304309,0.0013784118,0.010601777,0.0015909241,0.15626189,0.07866798,0.32499576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076082455,0.00046597086,0.67165726,0.00031677904,0.00034536986,0.0037496896,0.0017509391,0.012512054,0.0019842573,0.17049989,0.13652168,0.000120062396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00156874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001516148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05411432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088383973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048907165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1810304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601669021","doi":"","title":"Economic Analysis of Freedom of Expression","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Georgia State University law review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of expression; Expression (computer science); Economic analysis; Law and economics; Economics; Business; Political science; Law; Computer science; Classical economics; Human rights","score_opus":0.017552529858590696,"score_gpt":0.20109505968754535,"score_spread":0.18354252982895464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601669021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00808514,0.059370883,0.035702027,0.04988762,0.00086810073,0.0000387765,0.0005820329,0.000053138396,0.84541225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76174617,0.040859148,0.011934011,0.0052238307,0.0024972106,0.00017641926,0.00034284015,0.00011064055,0.17710969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933916,0.00023046022,0.00002181834,0.000095247524,0.00020632923,0.000106981366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988525,0.0007605447,0.000054773107,0.00010187744,0.00019664619,0.00003367144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011653451,0.0005250383,0.0006131519,0.0016785748,0.0015203722,0.0031620776,0.00070101704,0.0022641981,0.018458277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031228203,0.00033002024,0.0008822061,0.0015158001,0.005518041,0.0036258297,0.0007798575,0.0028957922,0.0018044001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003753228,0.0000040415375,0.000043829514,0.000012103963,0.0000039199913,0.000016680815,0.000022857905,0.00058104534,0.000020261605,0.9907684,0.0065361895,0.001986886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033495962,0.0000047306307,0.0004408081,0.00006104253,0.0000071410836,0.000021034199,0.000037321024,0.0011658706,0.000055763074,0.9645671,0.033631653,0.0000041102035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007824247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008411844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018458277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045240726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001856277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0617491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602074334","doi":"10.4337/9781781000151.00011","title":"Incentives for care, litigation, and tort reform under self-serving bias","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Tort reform; Incentive; Commit; Tort; Causation; Deterrence theory; Welfare; Negotiation; Deterrence (psychology); Welfare reform; Economics; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Liability; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04229173422969378,"score_gpt":0.2085780265003433,"score_spread":0.1662862922706495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602074334","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34836802,0.004310712,0.21558797,0.022034904,0.00021176161,0.00046392632,0.00036752518,0.00014194837,0.40851328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97448164,0.001193712,0.007103201,0.00055795076,0.00010786382,0.00011695048,0.000031694886,0.000012779928,0.016394157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659497,0.0018093735,0.0000914607,0.00022831955,0.0006715605,0.0006042198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960304,0.0021332023,0.00096335076,0.00025670166,0.0002929146,0.00032346128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034041475,0.00055611774,0.0006372945,0.00070929923,0.0010695277,0.003231879,0.0009443995,0.0032001187,0.00879672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062492522,0.00044950863,0.0006884401,0.0008285393,0.0039864257,0.0038485203,0.0015981155,0.0022544563,0.00056085375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027843049,0.000044108354,0.00084009796,0.000027929107,0.000007986902,0.000067631736,0.00013831642,0.017249886,0.00031714462,0.9759278,0.0007424222,0.004608923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008782039,0.00013073288,0.002141138,0.00005534248,0.000019913074,0.00015473874,0.0002816802,0.057898663,0.00030583653,0.929669,0.009227979,0.000027190235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033077442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036609783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00879672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053677773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036562001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038946092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602615357","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2468867","title":"Court Efficiency and Procurement Performance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Inefficiency; Procurement; Business; Payment; Work (physics); Law and economics; Finance; Economics; Microeconomics; Marketing; Engineering","score_opus":0.010857077831058373,"score_gpt":0.1875657435847266,"score_spread":0.17670866575366823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602615357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602591,0.00053767895,0.0017785057,0.00087587547,0.00001361564,0.000017825028,0.00026059637,0.000032802473,0.036224037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99524504,0.00006644812,0.00008515671,0.000048756978,0.000018931158,0.0000037390207,0.00015891413,0.000011327545,0.0043616765],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952247,0.002057022,0.00038612384,0.00045903877,0.00072446704,0.0011485938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9334961,0.041626908,0.011546512,0.0039691627,0.004278456,0.0050827987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077944924,0.0002853957,0.0006342294,0.0017252243,0.0008273409,0.0062958566,0.00064072874,0.0018054303,0.031574603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046847362,0.0003145975,0.0005507578,0.0022558738,0.0012485666,0.0034607206,0.0014504928,0.001653355,0.0049831653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025599336,0.0019814628,0.7739441,0.00015410969,0.0009287934,0.0007981119,0.0010764785,0.056847252,0.0036569578,0.11265456,0.005435383,0.039962932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018046879,0.0009602746,0.87202966,0.00009470866,0.00028199703,0.0008849147,0.0035358362,0.0313195,0.0031844764,0.08209525,0.005329219,0.00010373219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024978966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033244828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031574603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019724062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001548697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1056276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1629350424","doi":"10.1007/978-94-010-0642-2_12","title":"The Empirical Measure of Information Problems with Emphasis on Insurance Fraud","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hübner international series on risk, insurance, and economic security","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse selection; Moral hazard; Information asymmetry; Selection (genetic algorithm); Order (exchange); Margin (machine learning); Residual; Risk analysis (engineering); Point (geometry); Actuarial science; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Business; Incentive; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Finance; Algorithm; Machine learning","score_opus":0.026434830066419602,"score_gpt":0.21041937310903996,"score_spread":0.18398454304262035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1629350424","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09700001,0.13248897,0.50421536,0.069201775,0.001893422,0.0002253163,0.001886185,0.00025542383,0.19283348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8956487,0.036629044,0.049017247,0.0020624604,0.004204223,0.00035488306,0.0009907325,0.00008196539,0.011010758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99489754,0.002799218,0.00030686642,0.00044598329,0.0013603356,0.0001901046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9607861,0.032114703,0.0029207652,0.0021997676,0.0013854138,0.0005933243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005150856,0.0008905996,0.0010841705,0.0081746075,0.0007351877,0.004455772,0.0013641762,0.002809091,0.0052223126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05040233,0.00048686133,0.0006218985,0.008647615,0.007904251,0.010871852,0.0021173037,0.0043285047,0.00051198207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013220989,0.00004186303,0.0025740766,0.000094833114,0.00002683801,0.000030339987,0.00015632549,0.0024567023,0.000110587935,0.9531414,0.0066456776,0.034708187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004163711,0.000017308457,0.002863076,0.00013372242,0.000012770541,0.00013871939,0.00010145259,0.0053477925,0.00013719742,0.98345125,0.007779308,0.000013218687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059093506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048394545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0081746075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022162064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010376722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027240634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W164113893","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1152449","title":"Does Liability Affect Small Business?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Business; Liability; Limited liability; Actuarial science; Accounting; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.019090616756887405,"score_gpt":0.19675511458370917,"score_spread":0.17766449782682175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W164113893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8922236,0.0026944885,0.0021297194,0.045871753,0.00015316939,0.000033812703,0.0004015691,0.000037581332,0.056454293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996997,0.00039691373,0.000048954025,0.00053146423,0.00010558823,0.000002553675,0.000038459722,0.0000051807756,0.0018740074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985549,0.00050838233,0.00009239472,0.0001508686,0.00023244519,0.0004610654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96735615,0.01753263,0.008767616,0.0009893371,0.002258801,0.003095353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018452115,0.00014853422,0.00043675012,0.0012895567,0.0010012687,0.0023689226,0.0005579556,0.002978276,0.014004996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03111606,0.00017085519,0.0004033475,0.00084691384,0.002162539,0.0029053409,0.00086075836,0.0014488933,0.0012569125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075108284,0.0010400404,0.74047405,0.00016991598,0.0001899598,0.004020941,0.0023064923,0.0033583804,0.00171979,0.17543297,0.01242988,0.058106516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013767884,0.0006057393,0.65433925,0.00018008292,0.00023178388,0.0034792845,0.0044942037,0.006019719,0.0016400577,0.3053061,0.02350695,0.000059073638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039654216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045884917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014004996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011112368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013087296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046851397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1642029380","doi":"10.1177/203228441000100105","title":"A Pathology of Business Cartels: Original Sin or the Child of Regulation?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Journal of European Criminal Law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Sanctions; Enforcement; Law and economics; Political science; Imprisonment; Collusion; Liability; Law; Business; Criminology; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.038994683877068705,"score_gpt":0.23134779707565054,"score_spread":0.19235311319858184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1642029380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0659045,0.021597508,0.015965777,0.2723473,0.002632205,0.00005358356,0.00008610337,0.00018708584,0.62122595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.893627,0.008555149,0.0017141165,0.028153704,0.0022166835,0.00004985341,0.000049447994,0.00013100747,0.06550311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673635,0.0010949348,0.00007525266,0.0005715273,0.0008939676,0.00062789815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959871,0.0014380075,0.0006015019,0.0008858217,0.000601003,0.00048651826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033780104,0.00038288385,0.0005237757,0.0015239198,0.0059668357,0.013984854,0.0012831709,0.0061099054,0.0078588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006297474,0.00038518902,0.00036812155,0.001324024,0.09643963,0.013798492,0.005812,0.008875599,0.0012231779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059301497,0.000010734222,0.0005622853,0.000017285201,0.000002457935,0.00015072545,0.0050425963,0.000054454784,0.00007248811,0.98276883,0.005418456,0.0058936602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015331876,0.00003709,0.0022377938,0.00040954252,0.000008455995,0.0006589855,0.012212569,0.00036574627,0.0002866573,0.66374445,0.31999254,0.000030824176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008200555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006462271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013984854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044824844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061078207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032522798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1650564464","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2354630","title":"The Design and Implementation of Ethics-Related Administrative Law in Eastern Europe","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Administrative law; Political science","score_opus":0.040459429119301046,"score_gpt":0.2706666206589529,"score_spread":0.23020719153965186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1650564464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8368582,0.0009019171,0.027507836,0.005662168,0.00007151414,0.00030795965,0.00004671808,0.000089443936,0.1285543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899064,0.00007974779,0.004461221,0.00034349525,0.000010492807,0.00005649607,0.000017701757,0.000012947276,0.0051115276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9689988,0.022487374,0.0015315046,0.0018036595,0.0019603453,0.0032182697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720247,0.016295673,0.0028331345,0.0031418297,0.0039802347,0.0017244242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032780092,0.00020395717,0.0003970923,0.0018328705,0.0064853467,0.012869931,0.0017716644,0.0031018874,0.0040472737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041628372,0.00050744985,0.00042722706,0.0014728787,0.010319364,0.004063648,0.004362552,0.0018732598,0.00036580669],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011355051,0.00026108063,0.016483385,0.000078240344,0.00004241001,0.00028590678,0.0189998,0.0056747785,0.00083422073,0.916468,0.00132486,0.03943377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027241252,0.0008969352,0.1456748,0.00078721385,0.00017636153,0.0005042507,0.0543742,0.026517157,0.0062445085,0.61653376,0.14784463,0.00017368658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011467235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010663421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032780092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011244869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020801473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17335981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W165505607","doi":"10.29173/alr309","title":"Who Can Be Examined for Discovery: The Evolution of Rule 200(1) and its Application Under the Proposed Rules of Court","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Test (biology); Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Rule of law; Hull; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03311869611367676,"score_gpt":0.2287804469500598,"score_spread":0.19566175083638304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W165505607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1156413,0.0046412414,0.04555091,0.18674251,0.0013184125,0.00046468637,0.0002504095,0.00020185891,0.6451886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9307023,0.001111401,0.012951339,0.027042406,0.0005485103,0.00015267874,0.000094454204,0.000051070107,0.0273459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94125587,0.0138536645,0.0017895697,0.008658809,0.025597723,0.008844308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9324589,0.043847293,0.0032821828,0.0056488346,0.012221182,0.002541663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046453003,0.0003657418,0.0010859045,0.0028208646,0.010981011,0.020080624,0.0063826423,0.016414354,0.003795007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10930696,0.0010723654,0.0009335104,0.0020221034,0.043550164,0.009620604,0.0059303413,0.015045343,0.00096498465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023482471,0.000022889704,0.0017498246,0.000019304442,0.000011704383,0.0002538631,0.002465871,0.00049331767,0.00022205646,0.9744008,0.0063507976,0.0139861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014338548,0.000103949205,0.0094763525,0.00027385034,0.000088894405,0.0004525461,0.0044663697,0.0030433561,0.0014160231,0.83862215,0.14170536,0.00020764567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27708748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34902006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27708748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028177526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057469346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55094934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1675219350","doi":"","title":"Tort Reform, Disputes and Belief Formation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta; Carnegie Mellon University; Sage Foundation","keywords":"Plaintiff; Punitive damages; Tort reform; Settlement (finance); Tort; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Law; Liability; Finance","score_opus":0.024109555305635758,"score_gpt":0.19002046276160897,"score_spread":0.1659109074559732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1675219350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934589,0.00009330848,0.0010892722,0.00025224203,0.000004195613,0.000019531642,0.000027332755,0.000003969982,0.00505143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876994,0.000044731605,0.00043142226,0.000044999193,0.0000046640166,0.000017081265,0.000028832761,0.0000017904213,0.0006564716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973574,0.0013559072,0.00013989129,0.00032519188,0.0005577827,0.00026377567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96712655,0.020026363,0.009234425,0.001865274,0.00083291077,0.00091449224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004303162,0.00025601473,0.00039173002,0.0005273281,0.0007776998,0.0024453436,0.00049077807,0.0011670147,0.006453463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031209983,0.0002571111,0.00023096232,0.00056562305,0.0018425348,0.0013479282,0.001613807,0.0017287781,0.00035680918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006349166,0.011841781,0.5217525,0.00064908335,0.00043497843,0.000991529,0.037794624,0.014890146,0.06507914,0.20113051,0.00245572,0.13663092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091187895,0.002969286,0.73224217,0.00014030458,0.00041811197,0.0005512758,0.0141167855,0.038294856,0.015467537,0.1875356,0.0072225253,0.0001296739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021078966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017394124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006453463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001247432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005738036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02275753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W168700412","doi":"","title":"The September 11th Victim Compensation Fund: \"An Unprecedented Experiment in American Democracy\"","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; Waiver; Law; Economic Justice; Compensation (psychology); Business","score_opus":0.03496570770259191,"score_gpt":0.25840239419880906,"score_spread":0.22343668649621715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W168700412","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20690507,0.0036122424,0.0013304129,0.61087865,0.006564232,0.00008695369,0.00043816102,0.00011999242,0.17006436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85674447,0.001356006,0.0008081348,0.08004653,0.0035400058,0.0001617211,0.00014935802,0.00004903605,0.057144783],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730456,0.0011291496,0.00004089694,0.00020271643,0.0005504621,0.00077226426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976647,0.00092404976,0.00029321114,0.00015506217,0.0001962242,0.0007668251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047173775,0.000262691,0.00022166333,0.00038248274,0.0052143694,0.007682244,0.0006137608,0.005874529,0.0053331084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009910455,0.00016701882,0.00025904312,0.0003732309,0.0030676557,0.0028847368,0.0029867964,0.0059477077,0.00055030367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035985486,0.00030651013,0.011085933,0.000056513243,0.00004151468,0.0010038298,0.0056600296,0.0007345643,0.00037837654,0.31637514,0.6226153,0.041382384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002918226,0.00032583144,0.047943596,0.00028225913,0.000046125195,0.00030966595,0.011811413,0.001321557,0.00071294076,0.065509535,0.8713133,0.00013201618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0129613355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027564308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0129613355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030225338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00335415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025771797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W169425106","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2741","title":"Book Note: The Behavior of Federal Judges: A Theoretical and Empirical Study of Rational Choice, by Lee Epstein, William M Landes, and Richard A Posner","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Economics","score_opus":0.017439848079565258,"score_gpt":0.24589195986420898,"score_spread":0.22845211178464372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W169425106","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054039066,0.1359565,0.008828116,0.67839164,0.013906856,0.00004383735,0.0019150813,0.00009764049,0.1554565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23310885,0.18557487,0.00947751,0.15226762,0.045865815,0.00025122063,0.002007097,0.0002671586,0.3711799],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999199,0.00030349463,0.000039489973,0.00015607687,0.00024454575,0.000057330966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826392,0.014464674,0.00047273806,0.0003066508,0.0018691109,0.00024768792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001660808,0.000530276,0.000606078,0.0014803432,0.0022392215,0.0048497044,0.0010772808,0.005119567,0.0183067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010640176,0.00046124033,0.00037941223,0.0041326196,0.002743503,0.0064335195,0.00056951126,0.0048143766,0.005716524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010647477,0.000038423786,0.0009717519,0.00005306372,0.0000092369,0.000021332913,0.00026309126,0.00037393274,0.00003787154,0.17956272,0.8049508,0.013707044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003207622,0.0000228871,0.004857554,0.00043330385,0.000033914475,0.00007222265,0.0010121594,0.0017104152,0.00021613839,0.40153924,0.59001935,0.000050852024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019407775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039438274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019407775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002988106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003080176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061242044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17109628","doi":"10.29173/alr120","title":"Risk Allocation Provisions in Energy Industry Agreements: Are We Getting it Right?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Energy law; Business; Law and economics; Petroleum industry; Energy (signal processing); Actuarial science; Economics; Law; Industrial organization; Political science; Environmental law; Engineering","score_opus":0.052160116540395526,"score_gpt":0.23992901670404515,"score_spread":0.1877689001636496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17109628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032365594,0.037986223,0.048671648,0.32289344,0.0019649314,0.0002412804,0.00061418104,0.00042028996,0.55484235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.707011,0.03147247,0.056089565,0.09981134,0.0014150928,0.00029506502,0.00037394988,0.00032115012,0.10321046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95901173,0.0051494683,0.0015009498,0.002185286,0.02756269,0.004589818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9667255,0.014833438,0.0024132298,0.0017569986,0.013031336,0.0012395575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021768019,0.0007002375,0.0008976601,0.0033020377,0.0125063835,0.013673385,0.0053219823,0.010096014,0.00428279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06194831,0.0010907182,0.001062656,0.0038344555,0.018654138,0.008685539,0.0030316317,0.011815398,0.0007452843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064700716,0.000009445274,0.0004460685,0.0000745937,0.000009121626,0.000097323435,0.00160934,0.0009351402,0.00016734903,0.96623003,0.016180843,0.014234233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005057449,0.000029406336,0.005633509,0.0020410076,0.00008554505,0.00019555088,0.0044896193,0.0022335125,0.0013488391,0.41318536,0.5704255,0.00028151108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9171905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9371337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9171905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073339716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14735629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5321194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1716886166","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495564.009","title":"Interrelation of obligations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Unjust enrichment; Subordination (linguistics); Law and economics; Wrongdoing; Disappointment; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Economics; Restitution; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03614436688728514,"score_gpt":0.1805209379597641,"score_spread":0.14437657107247895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1716886166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026140863,0.004397355,0.22427212,0.0068479427,0.0006583627,0.00028647855,0.0005278522,0.00036085348,0.7365081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85854375,0.0045900717,0.050553337,0.0020469397,0.0009173571,0.0007199526,0.0006830537,0.00025203673,0.08169347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785331,0.00878012,0.0014519399,0.003551631,0.0055300663,0.0021531195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98642296,0.006596179,0.001373915,0.0024533896,0.002571714,0.0005817636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087410165,0.00084811356,0.0009374115,0.0038776519,0.005242603,0.010340037,0.0024107608,0.0027834876,0.01885793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018668348,0.0010355193,0.0009707526,0.0034359691,0.01606473,0.021097744,0.009452858,0.0052579707,0.002987663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048362226,0.000005358507,0.0001606579,0.000024866138,0.000007035831,0.00006945414,0.000702076,0.00012522221,0.00007568163,0.99492943,0.00060334,0.0032920204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008715709,0.00000908587,0.00042673288,0.000087813816,0.000015337328,0.00011129635,0.00038961408,0.0005796218,0.00017774459,0.9533875,0.04479074,0.000015799396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045976723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028407492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01885793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006478238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004194051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06308603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1734362552","doi":"10.3968/4919","title":"Judicial Efficiency, Incomplete Contract and Self-fulfillment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in sociology of science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contract management; Function (biology); Constraint (computer-aided design); Incentive; Perspective (graphical); Database transaction; Frustration of purpose; Severability; Exclusion clause; Point (geometry); Transaction cost; Economics; Business; Law and economics; Law; Microeconomics; Privity of contract; Political science; Computer science; Management; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04627958173035578,"score_gpt":0.28058764222150195,"score_spread":0.23430806049114616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1734362552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59305996,0.002506472,0.10092746,0.015283809,0.00011205944,0.00018889419,0.00022644561,0.000059864567,0.28763506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937469,0.00022622735,0.0015446194,0.00018079505,0.00005399399,0.000030162697,0.000024748273,0.000006668452,0.0041857692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99087673,0.0037958361,0.00071422756,0.0011588499,0.0019338448,0.0015203542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9687325,0.016349174,0.005866762,0.004103475,0.0032224827,0.001725667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014943175,0.0002837827,0.00084637624,0.0018458983,0.0019260416,0.0038491492,0.0012029874,0.0020806142,0.005957628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029578436,0.000261149,0.0007027277,0.001199634,0.01241931,0.006084955,0.0028609287,0.0020360027,0.0004006674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009677044,0.0000175604,0.0009708001,0.000013770165,0.000007912958,0.00004736134,0.0002819034,0.0012684582,0.00005998339,0.9944929,0.00034142693,0.002488362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002009932,0.000021504973,0.0014615547,0.000028853752,0.000006741629,0.00006118653,0.00031550103,0.0050961166,0.00013214779,0.9900727,0.0027744072,0.000009327531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023757017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012531022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014943175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032299703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033633024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07902795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W174660321","doi":"10.21991/c9hh3x","title":"STARVING IN THE SHADOW OF LAW: A COMMENT ON FINLAY V. CANADA (MINISTER OF FINANCE)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow (psychology); Political science; Law; Economic history; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.045176162093215226,"score_gpt":0.21153368760219687,"score_spread":0.16635752550898164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W174660321","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040818523,0.0034436493,0.00023901211,0.9648394,0.0038026082,0.00005858054,0.0006434767,0.00004666779,0.022844791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024451658,0.0013067481,0.00034375128,0.94825524,0.001741521,0.000057737365,0.00013656658,0.00007213256,0.023634609],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98437494,0.0014422538,0.0008032022,0.0016382317,0.006045014,0.0056963777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98131555,0.007868471,0.0009605993,0.0004956939,0.005741539,0.0036180294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009725972,0.0013302136,0.002429989,0.0017205456,0.030398991,0.013519882,0.010405722,0.094483376,0.0075954637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028061254,0.0020748067,0.0028093809,0.003913407,0.015251278,0.005793544,0.0043355944,0.060408276,0.00175993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006862228,0.000023813038,0.00106366,0.000087695094,0.00003448268,0.0005351041,0.0044136574,0.0001679218,0.0003238337,0.037075497,0.9537298,0.0024758151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022131082,0.000044103985,0.01012829,0.0007186685,0.0001976758,0.00037156584,0.012390236,0.0006234597,0.0010643748,0.016974114,0.95683,0.00043615545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.973712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9880691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094483376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08364886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18104015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6069178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1757413010","doi":"10.1257/000282805775014416","title":"Manufacturer Liability for Harms Caused by Consumers to Others","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Liability; Product (mathematics); Damages; Product liability; Business; Consumer protection; Strict liability; Willingness to pay; Homogeneous; Economics; Actuarial science; Commerce; Law; Finance; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.025845536326470943,"score_gpt":0.25966695012573093,"score_spread":0.23382141379926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1757413010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22255802,0.009784057,0.035848577,0.055055924,0.0006051392,0.00021774415,0.00054398185,0.0002484204,0.675138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94928837,0.0023153804,0.0033256672,0.008330733,0.0005569133,0.00006936602,0.00012497307,0.000020741863,0.035967954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942069,0.0018968254,0.00041438674,0.0006336028,0.002198375,0.0006499317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866607,0.006326218,0.0021402738,0.0025212674,0.0020624911,0.00028909932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048473068,0.00019420574,0.00041943393,0.0010570674,0.0016540705,0.0018725441,0.0010082475,0.0057490747,0.006272972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020526456,0.00031077492,0.0006592843,0.00043829973,0.002403603,0.0017771968,0.0012856966,0.0020453667,0.001227874],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007840864,0.00010031027,0.014088562,0.00021477441,0.00014606254,0.0017619489,0.0023877905,0.002222112,0.0020969927,0.8840474,0.053137943,0.039717663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013996122,0.00032631616,0.027543116,0.00076813827,0.00033972083,0.007459706,0.0012213358,0.007677274,0.0043131104,0.65479267,0.29530114,0.00011744962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023472134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022199526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006272972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010398865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022944368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025635302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1764710745","doi":"10.7202/1032035ar","title":"De la protection du propriétaire à la gestion du risque commercial : l’évolution du contrat à forfait en droit québécois","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01682636395497908,"score_gpt":0.2002142255400329,"score_spread":0.18338786158505382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1764710745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48215014,0.0079968795,0.013875378,0.06911779,0.00024690025,0.000094263196,0.000951177,0.000056115612,0.42551133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96057695,0.0010636237,0.0011020732,0.002003437,0.000063810934,0.000022823531,0.00007500296,0.000021346912,0.035070993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774194,0.000545538,0.000054651922,0.00037239015,0.0007449892,0.0005405654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931115,0.0027053875,0.0011788023,0.00034175176,0.0020600609,0.0006025648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026990627,0.00026258183,0.00042310054,0.0014137668,0.003831939,0.007882742,0.001489031,0.0033480313,0.013947779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009984796,0.0002685781,0.0005051454,0.0016369466,0.007934975,0.0020012162,0.0015092079,0.003960449,0.0004421342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040478873,0.00003482489,0.030055854,0.00006811077,0.000057442274,0.00029099686,0.007835548,0.0016905442,0.00044126838,0.9339609,0.00946989,0.016054098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007762426,0.00013570879,0.33775845,0.0010779153,0.00035191604,0.0003972539,0.028176354,0.016409094,0.0022374298,0.29502478,0.31810236,0.00025103652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8629659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89644855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13703412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036337104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02554743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2756822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1776212736","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3345622","title":"Social Norms and Legal Design","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01743830703295348,"score_gpt":0.20504795961589412,"score_spread":0.18760965258294063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1776212736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16027197,0.0051562293,0.1971521,0.07135929,0.0005093735,0.000206017,0.0002678934,0.00017469784,0.5649024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98162556,0.0005532709,0.008846508,0.00083893276,0.00014808211,0.00010900641,0.000043653014,0.000031289772,0.007803811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99043256,0.006706102,0.0003027285,0.0010370881,0.0010400004,0.0004815866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789514,0.0149972355,0.0015535962,0.0019305816,0.0017577206,0.00080941827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009851912,0.00039873616,0.0006204318,0.0019519383,0.0027394134,0.008706979,0.0010892132,0.0031454542,0.0073025944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020637192,0.00035869214,0.0004531907,0.0011432082,0.022813763,0.004740887,0.0020152433,0.0023355957,0.0005520123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044379335,0.000011937619,0.00044201934,0.0000112727075,0.0000087218295,0.00000980877,0.0005310283,0.00041491276,0.000028122076,0.99556726,0.0004989299,0.0024714335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000083489485,0.000004655913,0.00024546383,0.000013710092,0.0000036644424,0.000009770374,0.00022599196,0.000736453,0.00003414377,0.99509674,0.003617634,0.0000034044033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036306041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037246852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009851912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003783575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033438427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052102566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1815815727","doi":"10.71781/9832","title":"Méthodes et outils pour une affectation optimale des juges lors des compétitions : une application au concours John Molson","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.08127950491861828,"score_gpt":0.32189238059174485,"score_spread":0.24061287567312656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1815815727","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031921281,0.0006316166,0.9932126,0.00047098714,0.0001721643,0.00010688925,0.000067688066,0.00015476438,0.0019912026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11839483,0.0018722902,0.8596912,0.00040782682,0.0006539102,0.0012519762,0.00021347556,0.00075922004,0.016755342],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.996393,0.0020872408,0.00017170378,0.0005133823,0.00063119986,0.00020334285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784228,0.018834507,0.00040639416,0.00056330324,0.0015339562,0.00023902177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00944635,0.0021412452,0.002502455,0.0014982034,0.00097344455,0.0026039938,0.0020740852,0.0035453443,0.012133056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037681207,0.0012504226,0.0027184968,0.0013495359,0.0020237013,0.0034132882,0.0024606404,0.0053507932,0.0016419988],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034035157,0.0003371212,0.0017065995,0.0005407526,0.00025241796,0.00022223797,0.00062450394,0.56840783,0.003946442,0.18081756,0.0053511206,0.23745303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063786516,0.000054317778,0.0003072066,0.000077361794,0.000031434378,0.00003674196,0.00004913374,0.96571124,0.0008428662,0.029617568,0.0031707808,0.000037510323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014934909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011712826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014934909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019047417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030550195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049957693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1857746459","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2975","title":"The Role of Corporate Governance in Curbing Foreign Corrupt Business Practices","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Corporate governance; Sanctions; Language change; Multinational corporation; Business; Legislature; Legislation; Corrupt practices; Corporate law; Law and economics; Accounting; Law; Political science; Economics; Finance; Enforcement; Politics","score_opus":0.06780235889140031,"score_gpt":0.2316992478567737,"score_spread":0.1638968889653734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1857746459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41579384,0.00411941,0.028604643,0.031193936,0.0001970585,0.00020325021,0.000043944496,0.00011820922,0.51972574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99593794,0.00039444608,0.0008096353,0.0005229216,0.000031103587,0.000013274473,0.0000046517503,0.0000056577715,0.0022804083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99315405,0.0033316398,0.0001544773,0.00042707377,0.001241508,0.0016912331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98056525,0.008384863,0.0050820424,0.0017817612,0.0027893889,0.0013967409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00751414,0.00021768344,0.00027594736,0.0014310735,0.0025865447,0.0077527305,0.00058940705,0.0014168856,0.002211844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021220619,0.00017177763,0.00023891067,0.0010476161,0.010233295,0.0025317494,0.0022461335,0.0015168583,0.0002527748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003300763,0.00013455076,0.045412835,0.000114307666,0.000050936822,0.0003148446,0.0055130306,0.0042181117,0.0008113203,0.8850857,0.0037242016,0.054587156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011523365,0.00042685418,0.16022925,0.0017545607,0.00021609051,0.0006066309,0.022412358,0.019691557,0.005171583,0.6164151,0.1728613,0.00009958889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016774224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024929414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016774224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052962345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009089529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039739013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1880405826","doi":"","title":"Protecting the Interests of the Innocent Insured","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.023129088072581818,"score_gpt":0.2140710795703208,"score_spread":0.19094199149773897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1880405826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093408324,0.003788179,0.019675545,0.204843,0.0010476654,0.00014510016,0.00041380702,0.000090401125,0.67658794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8227104,0.002376142,0.0038069698,0.04828655,0.0011770168,0.00010006211,0.000121723264,0.00005188739,0.12136926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618596,0.00093105715,0.00020284296,0.00052099774,0.0013432999,0.0008158053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99387604,0.0022794676,0.0007393455,0.0011618062,0.0008996907,0.0010436624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046032774,0.00028140607,0.00066680106,0.0007191762,0.003049645,0.005958433,0.0011708076,0.0070567257,0.008771178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020474903,0.0002637214,0.00033630934,0.0004041194,0.004242594,0.002988994,0.0038489155,0.0050944937,0.003516414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007901264,0.0001089228,0.008544241,0.000066645815,0.000046888505,0.0010490189,0.0039241263,0.00038194994,0.0026695472,0.89219403,0.0494917,0.041443948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005281067,0.000091707705,0.006092024,0.00038011317,0.000067800924,0.0016203042,0.0026752595,0.0018673302,0.002586292,0.5789861,0.4055269,0.000053212632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004647489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004203132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008771178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014954061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005523981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029342532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1881965496","doi":"","title":"Le droit à L’avocat, une histoire d’argent","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archipelago (Université du Québec à Montréal)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.014102049411328475,"score_gpt":0.15736176604453903,"score_spread":0.14325971663321055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1881965496","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019869458,0.011904513,0.0039086514,0.05927491,0.0009000682,0.000034568628,0.0001892149,0.000053407843,0.90386516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5081814,0.006527545,0.0010946646,0.01477942,0.00046411436,0.000107609274,0.00016362841,0.0002113494,0.46847025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980794,0.00057006953,0.000040307204,0.00033135084,0.00048505448,0.0004937786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991955,0.00031020693,0.000091169546,0.000090066664,0.0002153993,0.000097752454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012516028,0.0005302777,0.00030085977,0.0009936236,0.012836715,0.009909482,0.0012426861,0.0033076452,0.0131606255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025930703,0.00031578925,0.00040551505,0.0015579433,0.024971502,0.005049569,0.0027211031,0.00672966,0.0017071838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018373461,0.000006058607,0.00059319596,0.00008123553,0.0000056342565,0.00021624129,0.04222557,0.00010785632,0.00016644082,0.91223985,0.03725132,0.007088304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032921625,0.000006570353,0.002362934,0.00016907761,0.0000053362364,0.000103786115,0.014632742,0.00011032371,0.00011436502,0.020095024,0.9623791,0.000017412034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47312754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5416149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47312754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025595058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011011946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94074726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1886721226","doi":"10.7202/1029354ar","title":"Les rapports de force lors des négociations des plaidoyers de culpabilité. Analyse du point de vue des avocats de la défense","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2585767764003207,"score_gpt":0.3173463457263637,"score_spread":0.05876956932604305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1886721226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9500973,0.0014415826,0.003506982,0.0013247454,0.000041992334,0.00008137903,0.00017934704,0.00003122695,0.04329533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802033,0.0004933113,0.0008908766,0.00010045011,0.000017075825,0.00004098372,0.000076318196,0.000011028946,0.018166672],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717844,0.0010837556,0.000060812054,0.00034012468,0.00086637464,0.00047045856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900185,0.003399672,0.0032313885,0.00033850633,0.0021013715,0.00091064785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002345395,0.00048210972,0.00031611638,0.00195805,0.0031871991,0.0029781885,0.0009858805,0.0010407978,0.011147856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011714134,0.0002879567,0.00028504655,0.0010545583,0.0031987196,0.0011826667,0.0019923958,0.0012962495,0.0009045446],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005449036,0.00027564456,0.3834777,0.00048645274,0.00021731574,0.0034299078,0.4055218,0.0015776387,0.013128917,0.035591938,0.0036468497,0.15210101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016798313,0.00032128303,0.79906756,0.000280204,0.00008143661,0.0006814899,0.14934334,0.0009023849,0.0029886377,0.0031110628,0.043121133,0.000084595194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.114206225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15468656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.114206225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059278817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029741134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22708297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1895059597","doi":"","title":"캐나다의 임금차별 판단 법리에 관한 비교법적 검토","year":2011,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"노동법학","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Plaintiff; Job evaluation; Employment discrimination; Equity (law); Government (linguistics); Equal employment opportunity; Labour economics; Work (physics); Efficiency wage; Labour law; Economics; Business; Actuarial science; Law; Political science; Job analysis; Job satisfaction; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.0560124256107259,"score_gpt":0.20191179066883108,"score_spread":0.1458993650581052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1895059597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09053968,0.0071571674,0.0065414845,0.04302814,0.00096593285,0.00039239178,0.0023378273,0.00039717698,0.8486401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6232076,0.0045562754,0.013479396,0.024670843,0.00015645487,0.00010745266,0.0012597125,0.000088186905,0.3324741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99442613,0.00021336136,0.00014502907,0.00038537197,0.0037032918,0.0011267634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954028,0.0005387005,0.00021074722,0.00018457904,0.00317622,0.0004869168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019033371,0.00025872618,0.00027457322,0.0018511377,0.010420359,0.004422668,0.0013570298,0.0020856396,0.009202211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052969735,0.00031266053,0.0004115184,0.0020220967,0.003346016,0.0010387868,0.0010689899,0.002274629,0.0009752798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004457794,0.000081840604,0.00965728,0.00024603057,0.000019624105,0.0005829152,0.0019183507,0.0004401624,0.0014762967,0.7369074,0.17763631,0.070989124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030363446,0.00005077797,0.04011759,0.00029112832,0.00003936884,0.00033605602,0.002382442,0.0013655161,0.0022209564,0.02174793,0.93127817,0.00013971314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96069896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9800392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039301038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03788236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14015646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27485704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189798375","doi":"10.1007/978-0-387-36445-2_1","title":"Causality, Psychological Injuries, and Court: Introduction","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Western Hospital; York University","funders":"","keywords":"License; Causality (physics); Point (geometry); Attribution; Psychology; Degree (music); Political science; Law; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.063584269850575,"score_gpt":0.26193684443116744,"score_spread":0.19835257458059244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189798375","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056008096,0.64290386,0.027598467,0.071856044,0.0102192415,0.0001587422,0.0019204317,0.00014383157,0.23959868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08815124,0.657352,0.015223443,0.023747457,0.028623875,0.00035929802,0.0017491218,0.00018759492,0.18460597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978095,0.00006701414,0.00001892959,0.00004961826,0.00005864144,0.000024852003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871075,0.000971018,0.000056937977,0.00003577064,0.00018004757,0.000045598103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007258305,0.0007288088,0.0006172586,0.002027169,0.000799632,0.0025182348,0.0011255603,0.0027095773,0.025231617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023289456,0.00047746545,0.00059417007,0.0026869744,0.0025173093,0.0036099555,0.0012004308,0.003068903,0.0026429722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023326375,0.00014435888,0.001459687,0.00080725277,0.000026185939,0.00024980993,0.00062634645,0.0015339535,0.00018859359,0.71368444,0.18364091,0.09761512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008981633,0.00003272574,0.0033656936,0.0011441,0.000018167048,0.0004288146,0.0004867447,0.0005793929,0.000075688244,0.53023475,0.4635942,0.00003068868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00552948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068011964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025231617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015023849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014323498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08440822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1944745319","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511807336.007","title":"Risk, Utility, and Insurance","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Actuarial science; Business","score_opus":0.034373802231180646,"score_gpt":0.1780698058113744,"score_spread":0.14369600358019377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1944745319","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031963482,0.15068662,0.027668204,0.020971537,0.0006475964,0.000050040344,0.00035546356,0.00006973381,0.7675873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8859604,0.046234474,0.0045222705,0.0013842799,0.0012036775,0.000075195414,0.00017208331,0.000037164977,0.0604105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992223,0.0003133241,0.000029012623,0.00010383827,0.00023065555,0.00010082622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992974,0.00044917307,0.00005615148,0.000059974158,0.000083709834,0.00005361559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001075363,0.00056459644,0.0005057727,0.0009873972,0.0010612225,0.00395376,0.0005607642,0.0018948114,0.0075883903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034430479,0.00023323724,0.0002986387,0.0012007294,0.0052981367,0.0032829333,0.0012064473,0.0022740727,0.0006905635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004692618,0.0000075864086,0.00022249891,0.000022535332,0.0000033984086,0.000021629978,0.000087996705,0.0010012006,0.00001931472,0.986837,0.003210654,0.008561547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024528529,0.000006149165,0.00045758337,0.000070104725,0.000003291571,0.000039949307,0.00008573476,0.0010404533,0.000017612589,0.9790435,0.019228455,0.0000046856194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004690203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003096526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075883903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033628887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012583367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025385678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W195110709","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495564.004","title":"Liability for economic harms","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Harm; Tort; Obligation; Negotiation; Liability; Law and economics; Business; Action (physics); Compensation (psychology); Political science; Damages; Law; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03704591784970482,"score_gpt":0.18756954559398262,"score_spread":0.1505236277442778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W195110709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019402789,0.0065601487,0.024142992,0.029681642,0.0011450058,0.00025370874,0.0004349754,0.0001431539,0.91823554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6945941,0.0068376497,0.008951954,0.030677948,0.004077653,0.0010954599,0.0007206702,0.00014040245,0.25290415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833028,0.0043801973,0.0015208955,0.0021747511,0.006630027,0.0019913188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98483247,0.0074854814,0.0015251831,0.003871561,0.0016913615,0.00059393974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010782782,0.0010744198,0.0011241469,0.0018557955,0.004074783,0.0060339454,0.0025490846,0.01847469,0.012967188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033848736,0.00093480264,0.0012224895,0.0014036535,0.011226524,0.0060329186,0.010120973,0.008811205,0.004540332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001991417,0.00003603821,0.0012581121,0.00007165954,0.000027105467,0.0008714472,0.00087032607,0.00038989834,0.00025179647,0.969477,0.0149211725,0.011805612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005499226,0.000059479975,0.002003115,0.00074322755,0.000041289866,0.002696607,0.00046449684,0.0010750283,0.00042992953,0.7294302,0.2629485,0.000053137504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016700474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014884433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01847469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023291106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051866956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057025492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1953586611","doi":"10.1111/irel.12098","title":"A Quantitative Assessment of the Effect of First Contract Arbitration on Bargaining Relationships","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Mediation; Certification; Misconduct; Business; Econometrics; Actuarial science; Demographic economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Management","score_opus":0.11731245709627111,"score_gpt":0.2834060011161365,"score_spread":0.1660935440198654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1953586611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.956286,0.0007215784,0.0033322424,0.00073702954,0.000019919355,0.00013303228,0.00066979334,0.000036562356,0.03806379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785197,0.00012210659,0.00050213555,0.00004047195,0.000013534342,0.00001995555,0.00011902732,0.000002938415,0.0013278627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874144,0.0039025592,0.0007762727,0.0010164954,0.004698238,0.002191973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81925625,0.1068786,0.04741755,0.008619701,0.012956571,0.004871387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013885923,0.0002421767,0.00055532693,0.0028722319,0.0021332938,0.0027767033,0.0015170152,0.0009878408,0.008147758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0845763,0.00026607802,0.0005602297,0.0031020138,0.0034070571,0.0015971594,0.0015735991,0.0017733723,0.00043554814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027390275,0.00033172767,0.92039794,0.00017788092,0.0002908043,0.00025663732,0.0014088855,0.010433239,0.0019502278,0.021984551,0.00092559116,0.0415686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015422054,0.000298314,0.9859002,0.00004503417,0.00006529571,0.0001807941,0.0016271239,0.003604017,0.00088221114,0.0028618963,0.0044922964,0.000027324817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17329966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23369737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17329966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008214656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007300172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3445819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1957227438","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1734238","title":"Polluters and Abaters","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.008791281927442012,"score_gpt":0.18865235564734992,"score_spread":0.1798610737199079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1957227438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19360489,0.009367912,0.0031055992,0.15381208,0.0010081,0.00006596173,0.0015294169,0.00018624419,0.63731974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8589393,0.002643168,0.00026349895,0.010219605,0.00076222245,0.000023462075,0.00019413728,0.000037808477,0.12691686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981629,0.00044251003,0.000072551564,0.00032655633,0.00043644337,0.00055896805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963253,0.0013054573,0.0009951058,0.00032533432,0.0006472187,0.00040162797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013555824,0.00017604647,0.00048357612,0.0016577243,0.002997793,0.0063222684,0.0006419136,0.00482615,0.06389016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007235818,0.00026979024,0.0004786852,0.0015918979,0.0037605604,0.0035936637,0.0017656712,0.0030546146,0.00306154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009875659,0.0001313974,0.023437016,0.0001321063,0.000073526484,0.00031468368,0.0017012402,0.0010084225,0.00021384095,0.8672028,0.07867352,0.027012639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008239263,0.00010999633,0.05993306,0.00029591235,0.00013258678,0.0003904684,0.012096023,0.002198582,0.0008267205,0.5267505,0.39710045,0.00008328137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02086993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03505937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06389016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026695456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029644507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21373385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1961529893","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1616708","title":"Why Stare Decisis?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Temptation; Ex-ante; Perspective (graphical); Sunk costs; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Macroeconomics; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.013150211542851661,"score_gpt":0.20629128033195082,"score_spread":0.19314106878909915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1961529893","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052814487,0.004468453,0.007399556,0.54322916,0.0047136196,0.00006660684,0.00038578463,0.00039675925,0.38652557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67842644,0.0038152677,0.0031330215,0.16734403,0.004501383,0.00008905711,0.0002484166,0.0008320553,0.14161031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535584,0.0014929844,0.0002027356,0.00087625557,0.0010280462,0.0010440708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761789,0.008701072,0.0020846934,0.0031707634,0.0068619833,0.003002611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008922935,0.00022895442,0.0006669695,0.0014840242,0.005558751,0.008075162,0.0012150354,0.008120855,0.037261385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06126446,0.0003536698,0.0004934312,0.0012679247,0.009148817,0.008401266,0.0034307956,0.011151698,0.010869524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008929898,0.00006611084,0.008269535,0.000108620625,0.00003379433,0.00051167514,0.002512715,0.00022173912,0.00015666301,0.6615967,0.28443775,0.04199537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055352135,0.000040117775,0.0047749486,0.00028767306,0.00002006883,0.00059616455,0.0042058094,0.00054287614,0.0003885813,0.5613445,0.42769864,0.000045174853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048860945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009136168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037261385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024014064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038872932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12465179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963848811","doi":"10.7202/050307ar","title":"Grievance Arbitration in Nova Scotia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Grievance; Arbitration; Nova (rocket); Political science; Law; Geography; Archaeology; Engineering; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.04028902097641656,"score_gpt":0.22663269631426022,"score_spread":0.18634367533784366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963848811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97682774,0.0021978444,0.00017688214,0.00226897,0.000052540734,0.00004370193,0.0005016837,0.0000078516305,0.017922774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992683,0.00054436957,0.00009853185,0.00028666458,0.0000093883145,0.0000074575423,0.00014574039,0.00000220617,0.006222747],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986314,0.00012722067,0.00006981989,0.00015054843,0.00030476536,0.0007162222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99185187,0.0019096821,0.0027819462,0.0003001489,0.0018048385,0.0013516276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012747379,0.00010893981,0.00023122651,0.0014336748,0.0029085972,0.001523013,0.00054290844,0.0005964456,0.0018941794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006657692,0.00016968121,0.0001526287,0.0014288287,0.0014592939,0.00052909885,0.0014383778,0.0011252176,0.00018105279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086288765,0.00023562292,0.81121093,0.00044306382,0.00013472691,0.013193981,0.033625036,0.003125436,0.0042683766,0.03281302,0.01527897,0.08480802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027387483,0.000060162456,0.9678275,0.00012782998,0.000014829094,0.00036621233,0.0059730806,0.00059091754,0.00041506693,0.000776955,0.023795243,0.000024996898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92039025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9754782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07960975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019025885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019014554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16015714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964604709","doi":"10.7202/043375ar","title":"La justice contractuelle : mythe ou réalité ?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.013508221980873284,"score_gpt":0.2086609386967649,"score_spread":0.19515271671589163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964604709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0347945,0.02013872,0.009777892,0.39198402,0.0017201297,0.000045297344,0.0002554679,0.000067272944,0.54121673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8832451,0.006248153,0.0016030507,0.024837038,0.0010839328,0.000063098414,0.00008127543,0.000057975623,0.08278034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99491644,0.001282546,0.00011153526,0.00062426477,0.0015999255,0.0014653702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966882,0.0008747536,0.00026656862,0.000388318,0.0013089809,0.00047316542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004179927,0.00036392646,0.0005251767,0.0014007144,0.011480117,0.011092422,0.0017627882,0.004948995,0.009718733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008683724,0.0002614265,0.00028135994,0.0016614437,0.037274815,0.006227687,0.0029408378,0.007620622,0.0006236034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004003803,0.000005398033,0.00031228492,0.000015614647,0.000003152154,0.000030379075,0.0024081885,0.00006243031,0.0000412455,0.9828639,0.0099275615,0.0043259077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001598496,0.000016919264,0.004734695,0.0005542418,0.000015010181,0.00013212708,0.011679066,0.0008714843,0.0002505345,0.46103695,0.52062464,0.00006829307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74365664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7810757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74365664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048274033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043929193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965286829","doi":"10.7202/005671ar","title":"Qu'est-ce qu'un acte jugé faisable ?","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1922729065955969,"score_gpt":0.2642070427026229,"score_spread":0.07193413610702601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965286829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08039573,0.008540248,0.10658894,0.18963453,0.0030827187,0.0001278462,0.0005449766,0.00023908104,0.61084604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8761519,0.004348631,0.025229527,0.010914393,0.0015185198,0.00018856113,0.00018041253,0.00017439136,0.08129362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923046,0.002807625,0.00026455522,0.001639794,0.0019648217,0.0010185557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99072754,0.003287704,0.00095831056,0.0012566962,0.0028250786,0.0009447021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010451066,0.00045353296,0.00086115784,0.0012220942,0.004620875,0.008660084,0.0012850851,0.0053014876,0.013482069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021827772,0.00044054788,0.0006895265,0.0010521149,0.017306548,0.011331278,0.0022558994,0.0044781053,0.0036801677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043324002,0.000031817966,0.0011602992,0.000056246437,0.00002450588,0.00010779596,0.0015687076,0.00017510932,0.00031119504,0.98072445,0.004509467,0.011287104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029724904,0.00005317952,0.00233146,0.0002493521,0.00004547245,0.00037154029,0.0037952103,0.0011189621,0.00093085354,0.8410473,0.14998303,0.000043913395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070719467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069748443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013482069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033813496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049327915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05527115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969163031","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0064","title":"Why is this taking so long?: The move toward a national securities regulator","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Regulator; Business; Regulatory authority; Law and economics; Accounting; Public economics; Economics; Political science; Public administration","score_opus":0.018817514721210415,"score_gpt":0.19348312394984654,"score_spread":0.17466560922863614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969163031","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10252587,0.003009513,0.031312928,0.6959375,0.0010145417,0.00011521722,0.00011797292,0.00013395662,0.1658325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9335129,0.0009760331,0.007923833,0.04041669,0.00020523663,0.000057725534,0.00002975244,0.000029443781,0.01684837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99258864,0.002119151,0.00014643047,0.0011247972,0.0020376958,0.0019832298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899811,0.002294403,0.0008770716,0.000686433,0.0039659464,0.0021950086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010614961,0.00021932472,0.0005342708,0.0005231712,0.0089782765,0.0087761665,0.0019077113,0.011552927,0.003643784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016361786,0.00032737764,0.0006823111,0.00074027246,0.012684427,0.006612263,0.0027307745,0.00939322,0.0006564088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029136289,0.000029133009,0.0023331372,0.000032441694,0.000012065759,0.0001643188,0.0019808265,0.0014281828,0.0003953753,0.9681313,0.018326392,0.007137612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013440776,0.00011094887,0.006817564,0.00028117595,0.000082511164,0.00034660057,0.008302891,0.013214702,0.0018461983,0.6953567,0.27332714,0.00017921385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42213833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4829004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96833974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031660244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060435444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83936244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969948913","doi":"10.1108/01437730210445829","title":"Managerial intervention in disputes: the role of cognitive biases and heuristics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leadership & Organization Development Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Intervention (counseling); Rationality; Cognitive bias; Cognition; Outcome (game theory); Selection (genetic algorithm); Psychology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Political science; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.0648021800821702,"score_gpt":0.21301487272237862,"score_spread":0.14821269264020842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969948913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8529831,0.0028830254,0.055762075,0.0124456985,0.00016658267,0.00021213268,0.00004955999,0.00009791256,0.075399995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996516,0.00025580748,0.0024114395,0.00026490504,0.000038783626,0.000035878435,0.000007850973,0.000008425266,0.00046103567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96870965,0.022038413,0.0010559912,0.0013693811,0.003752666,0.0030740313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82404786,0.13295203,0.027064208,0.008188378,0.004117012,0.003630542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03439886,0.00045132893,0.00066464586,0.0020303475,0.0023045044,0.0074245417,0.0014728332,0.003229278,0.0027019342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15507226,0.00041505933,0.0004990463,0.0014788694,0.010209873,0.004531042,0.0044669737,0.0028995783,0.00027222728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008491022,0.00073249283,0.1340991,0.0006739959,0.0003835282,0.0010822817,0.0479576,0.018662572,0.0024009384,0.60876006,0.003743779,0.18065453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023758448,0.00031314557,0.06317169,0.00041063584,0.00010343526,0.00039029436,0.015550286,0.021191943,0.0013872024,0.8847432,0.01237001,0.00013046495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002072994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001865957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03439886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024288923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037987677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18192077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971720514","doi":"10.7202/1024850ar","title":"Une nouvelle perspective et de nouveaux défis pour les enquêtes internationales","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Mesure et évaluation en éducation","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.03905584978548879,"score_gpt":0.3013266632520025,"score_spread":0.2622708134665137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971720514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20509496,0.17379716,0.07346362,0.21703571,0.00850247,0.00085016026,0.0015517772,0.0003195979,0.31938455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8803424,0.043809257,0.026073234,0.018647669,0.0021210564,0.0015063006,0.0010350258,0.00047972254,0.025985349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92113686,0.046089273,0.00490399,0.0081828665,0.015635738,0.0040512145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8223215,0.11143773,0.019663459,0.0105461255,0.031642854,0.0043884288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.085271075,0.0013906077,0.0011935806,0.010658337,0.0060385484,0.017973017,0.0032114997,0.00337659,0.013818836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13425888,0.0009055181,0.0014034295,0.01314065,0.014818319,0.018402357,0.0095249545,0.0063748993,0.0014730288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033040982,0.00018304845,0.07293165,0.0046881456,0.00040502913,0.0004716119,0.16134365,0.0006548238,0.0007671386,0.5070988,0.0213478,0.22977784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007781824,0.00064847054,0.1468869,0.017842967,0.00049851503,0.0011766581,0.20845035,0.0009469458,0.00208972,0.10254167,0.51855785,0.000282175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03095512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027130906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085271075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0121502485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012732756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45096195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973029092","doi":"10.7202/050587ar","title":"Compensation Management and Canadian Wrongful Dismissal: Lessons from Litigation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Compensation (psychology); Unfair dismissal; Constructive; Law; Labour law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03958451142242543,"score_gpt":0.2169475890688175,"score_spread":0.1773630776463921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973029092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29404542,0.0390789,0.004152593,0.17741995,0.0010278017,0.00016951525,0.0008978215,0.00017006123,0.4830379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95181626,0.014391066,0.0010997248,0.0102829775,0.0002226838,0.000029223049,0.00025417126,0.000052522788,0.02185138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98448724,0.0012364879,0.0004087641,0.00089980476,0.0079812845,0.004986417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740844,0.009193983,0.002089699,0.0007279915,0.01233554,0.0015684247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008084762,0.000599817,0.00072090776,0.010921921,0.03155979,0.01534529,0.0033815582,0.0063996324,0.0073270253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047628473,0.00072095793,0.000939994,0.014757858,0.013039887,0.0045014857,0.003936331,0.005668537,0.0004573386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009850283,0.00007519507,0.03485137,0.00035011518,0.000070552516,0.002324925,0.034077827,0.0041186,0.00031005268,0.7530589,0.07711456,0.09354937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095180956,0.00006437735,0.13867718,0.0016629079,0.00028406814,0.0015593137,0.07821738,0.0068072635,0.0010198725,0.077208124,0.69383854,0.0005657805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99524766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22212887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22212887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21084961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90222025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973116266","doi":"10.1023/b:ejle.0000045081.01565.ed","title":"Can Making It Harder to Convict Criminals Ever Reduce Crime?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Law and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Convict; Commercial law; Public finance; Criminology; Criminal law; European integration; Political science; Law; Economics; Sociology; European union","score_opus":0.06615290210236026,"score_gpt":0.24536237026472774,"score_spread":0.1792094681623675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973116266","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2264689,0.006958269,0.008490302,0.6395329,0.0071873,0.00011454,0.0006188278,0.00042455512,0.110204406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8753662,0.0036473707,0.0045242687,0.089827545,0.0048547345,0.00022014571,0.00030775234,0.00023535152,0.021016652],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994011,0.002553491,0.00017053455,0.0005454693,0.0012280418,0.0014913924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9614357,0.015562198,0.006428501,0.0023722434,0.0046612206,0.009540095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057918523,0.0010310408,0.0011931304,0.0018553451,0.0025902463,0.003965642,0.002511645,0.008507517,0.033521682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07499718,0.00040414618,0.0007536619,0.0014572783,0.003823323,0.007059656,0.0029244341,0.0044460446,0.0066988072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018664143,0.0070884647,0.051561713,0.0013407831,0.00096094987,0.0006257031,0.0029747041,0.007941701,0.0035718821,0.15668868,0.4071053,0.35827374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014129865,0.002438056,0.18761273,0.0018024256,0.0010951203,0.001095689,0.011924724,0.008919654,0.0040076217,0.5253336,0.25408292,0.00027451292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065883114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013001214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033521682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015624199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006210579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11214119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973647890","doi":"10.1006/jeem.1999.1108","title":"Regulatory Rule-Making with Legal Challenges","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Management","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Regulator; Rationality; Constraint (computer-aided design); Incentive; Private information retrieval; Microeconomics; Process (computing); Business; Economics; Block (permutation group theory); Industrial organization; Computer science; Computer security; Law; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.011965773995940662,"score_gpt":0.1676368213221443,"score_spread":0.15567104732620363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973647890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06859669,0.009080131,0.110417016,0.38252455,0.0026209762,0.00018926538,0.00027284643,0.00014720933,0.4261513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630558,0.001181436,0.009521747,0.013309231,0.0022531075,0.000118777534,0.000047126294,0.000048682236,0.010464138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97755563,0.010252244,0.00094306696,0.0042687794,0.004412302,0.0025679125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9495713,0.03448794,0.0027954346,0.0059120515,0.0053291568,0.0019041913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033399753,0.000610551,0.0017329198,0.001421472,0.005979775,0.018293409,0.0037247543,0.018347118,0.006965395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08081038,0.00073990034,0.0011284798,0.0011649915,0.025605487,0.013674369,0.0038571567,0.013588535,0.0010873905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013180576,0.000021239664,0.00016145846,0.000016754226,0.000015892929,0.000051773517,0.00021659787,0.0011789056,0.000047019636,0.9909457,0.0035796897,0.0037518549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016548393,0.000004264542,0.00010022659,0.000022698037,0.0000070458677,0.000013227431,0.00012567778,0.0013226699,0.000043130563,0.9927153,0.0056208647,0.000008345205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054989643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006323844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033399753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056134956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009815186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17663687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974193238","doi":"10.7202/043004ar","title":"L'accident ou la faute non intentionnelle en droit des assurances privées québécois","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.010742275406746514,"score_gpt":0.2026598260103269,"score_spread":0.19191755060358037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974193238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56779605,0.0074909986,0.004694077,0.034001324,0.00058584346,0.00009396927,0.001204138,0.00008594723,0.3840477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8615264,0.0017972479,0.0005325097,0.0015649637,0.000055753848,0.000027669652,0.00016784822,0.000014879898,0.13431266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979819,0.0003586375,0.00006697423,0.00018434248,0.00072237453,0.0006857854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996194,0.00093302014,0.00063442613,0.00017212456,0.0014333985,0.0006330946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013622663,0.00027157247,0.0002506741,0.0008155979,0.008847882,0.0036692026,0.00050310727,0.001700503,0.019657314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060391813,0.00019890034,0.00024314172,0.0011434256,0.0035748936,0.0014139492,0.0018231128,0.0020115804,0.0007724142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018999547,0.00008121253,0.120059654,0.00037780104,0.00007713336,0.002164473,0.09509838,0.0017379312,0.0017412709,0.610924,0.0801999,0.08734831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002666908,0.00011632567,0.28574282,0.0007736821,0.000113661335,0.0011779161,0.07451437,0.0017126943,0.00091847766,0.019238241,0.6154794,0.00018567902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9276667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9561145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9276667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02511626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03334966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18223208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975773252","doi":"10.7202/1000789ar","title":"Law, Economics, and Beyond: A Case for Retheorizing the Business Corporation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Theory of the firm; Corporation; Shareholder value; Principal–agent problem; Shareholder; Outsourcing; Corporate law; Economics; Debt; Business; Law and economics; Finance; Neoclassical economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.05887725011325028,"score_gpt":0.21292028777657418,"score_spread":0.1540430376633239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975773252","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075939572,0.08441199,0.008483314,0.81445026,0.005919106,0.000029995479,0.000028300816,0.00006360371,0.07901941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.630621,0.067167014,0.009976136,0.21845628,0.02779252,0.0002143938,0.00005789983,0.0003358361,0.045378875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883259,0.0066559855,0.0003193039,0.0009576994,0.0024600835,0.001281057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9666666,0.02606246,0.0010577647,0.0019880412,0.00304578,0.0011793772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016228849,0.00075782504,0.0012448509,0.006789514,0.0098052975,0.022575194,0.0029166024,0.016008718,0.0046038018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026281837,0.0005505069,0.0008144372,0.003111587,0.10039914,0.044565395,0.00808861,0.023416694,0.0008176094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006145879,0.0000074544073,0.000057647187,0.000024382924,0.0000025427466,0.000052805877,0.0014730043,0.00008954853,0.000035188645,0.98413265,0.00959517,0.004523423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066139482,0.0000062940994,0.00009785503,0.00020616382,0.0000026727685,0.000049162714,0.0025535254,0.00023636078,0.000053224274,0.84376526,0.15300667,0.00001611915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014598127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011773287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022575194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012927249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011970293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09379417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976157411","doi":"10.1177/1473095213510430","title":"The Fourth Coase Theorem: State planning rules and spontaneity in action","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"New York Institute of Technology","funders":"New York Institute of Technology","keywords":"Coase theorem; State (computer science); Property rights; Property (philosophy); Action (physics); Mathematical economics; Economics; Law and economics; Zoning; Transaction cost; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science; Law; Epistemology; Physics","score_opus":0.0375494554350072,"score_gpt":0.23605622965980744,"score_spread":0.19850677422480023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976157411","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020876337,0.0008913561,0.77946734,0.010010438,0.00028594723,0.00023999345,0.00030786745,0.0003515722,0.18756926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8194879,0.00080629316,0.1589821,0.0014401255,0.00024741385,0.00076054403,0.00018806948,0.00022773407,0.017859705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99379057,0.001988775,0.00055024785,0.001659136,0.0012262191,0.0007850033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843501,0.010211197,0.00079171977,0.0030271618,0.0012572898,0.00036251565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008564045,0.0007003442,0.001159296,0.0017985582,0.0027820955,0.0055825454,0.002647219,0.004030795,0.011247445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020690009,0.00074873725,0.0025540749,0.0011524239,0.02180647,0.014645766,0.0044445363,0.0054870127,0.0012568304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004963067,0.0000028004797,0.00005881147,0.000011154332,0.00000365858,0.000026317748,0.00017196666,0.0008532698,0.000048805778,0.9970662,0.00029112358,0.0014608867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018611305,0.00001050924,0.000053647163,0.000023288301,0.000006358215,0.000064691514,0.000087554916,0.004780245,0.00034962667,0.9867753,0.007818297,0.000012043034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049918196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011247445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041352934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049254242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045291543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976301838","doi":"10.7202/042365ar","title":"Les lendemains de l'arrêt Kravitz : la responsabilité du fabricant dans une perspective de réforme","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Obligation; Warranty; Law; Liability; Political science; Damages; Action (physics); Legislature","score_opus":0.011339133286756103,"score_gpt":0.21348579532174047,"score_spread":0.20214666203498438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976301838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09590112,0.014890076,0.019564455,0.122333005,0.0004003984,0.000073481315,0.00007724549,0.00010123221,0.74665904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94142944,0.0020045885,0.0024413127,0.006838562,0.00029586614,0.00007457994,0.000014738048,0.000038530867,0.046862304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523264,0.001630885,0.000093146344,0.00069634174,0.0011556846,0.0011912935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978935,0.0011499157,0.0001910874,0.00030306054,0.00031564894,0.00014690158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005497788,0.00039788202,0.000508265,0.0011024782,0.00932837,0.010225011,0.0017471137,0.008111205,0.0032076915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008340462,0.00043439955,0.00059346063,0.00085318554,0.02841549,0.006848735,0.0030273541,0.0088832155,0.00047827605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003970167,0.0000031160414,0.000046300633,0.0000034552934,7.625716e-7,0.000016078135,0.00043451847,0.00009769843,0.00003242435,0.9976895,0.0007553748,0.000916948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042308373,0.00003925623,0.0012943838,0.00016267269,0.000018354947,0.00009861056,0.0015490579,0.0012917084,0.0004627277,0.8315786,0.1634224,0.000039905048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12294137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10656379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12294137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01745163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011830032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24445158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979001178","doi":"10.1023/b:cope.0000003859.10184.f3","title":"The Core, Transaction Costs, and the Coase Theorem","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Political Economy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coase theorem; Externality; Transaction cost; Core (optical fiber); Economics; Pareto efficiency; Microeconomics; Pareto principle; Negotiation; Excludability; Public good; Mathematical economics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Operations management","score_opus":0.024761813864985802,"score_gpt":0.21848836027172536,"score_spread":0.19372654640673956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979001178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10382259,0.009611586,0.26103196,0.030430691,0.00038613053,0.00014977153,0.00071458204,0.00022992546,0.5936228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.950914,0.0027861663,0.009566612,0.0015183254,0.0006527992,0.00017397139,0.00014343658,0.000115624105,0.034129124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997535,0.0009200512,0.000096249605,0.00044311164,0.00059842726,0.00040728363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854897,0.010199666,0.0008831087,0.0018010625,0.0012125267,0.00041396276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036928493,0.00043475852,0.0013867313,0.0017294119,0.0019465005,0.0066097393,0.0014233332,0.0027743725,0.02231116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019128652,0.00047637915,0.00073245977,0.0020460717,0.007636596,0.012515526,0.002211999,0.0040972373,0.0017957516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000751072,0.0000056174904,0.000061144616,0.000010943198,0.0000026396656,0.000008221401,0.000022539243,0.00039445155,0.000019487941,0.99682164,0.0010019132,0.0016438953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056158647,0.0000024184671,0.0000710456,0.000009287304,0.0000023828713,0.0000130368335,0.000017012351,0.0010848074,0.00004185998,0.9966491,0.0021009576,0.0000025429238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026214286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015540371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02231116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033077914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024021878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07463825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980649074","doi":"10.7202/042772ar","title":"Les aléas de la fraude en droit criminel","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Criminal code; Supreme court; Political science; Mens rea; Interpretation (philosophy); Scope (computer science); Criminal law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.015286146131422715,"score_gpt":0.21640600628834003,"score_spread":0.20111986015691732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980649074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09872205,0.010339602,0.0053268676,0.043698404,0.0009293101,0.00007178759,0.00067251496,0.00021826464,0.8400212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72494143,0.0037763664,0.0019529533,0.0048447046,0.0005556677,0.000040768733,0.00013334397,0.000059780887,0.263695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997498,0.0005162083,0.00006927768,0.000286897,0.0011710929,0.00045852046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987129,0.00048544846,0.00021914163,0.00013781092,0.00034597554,0.00009871188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016164535,0.00037859965,0.00032467165,0.001235106,0.0046963794,0.007464956,0.0005145717,0.0030641393,0.01577905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063912696,0.0002877465,0.00035509284,0.0010859686,0.0037051507,0.0018539142,0.0012470215,0.003951141,0.0018937439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044022087,0.000024056457,0.0037484367,0.000040385457,0.000008724344,0.0007117711,0.002331204,0.00031653463,0.00030533702,0.93950266,0.027787592,0.025179308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026424406,0.000030900894,0.0115351,0.00022894332,0.00001544932,0.0019435821,0.0024724086,0.0009838192,0.0010216731,0.05335487,0.92834127,0.000045570236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13714264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13821462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13714264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007886357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004284388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2726888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981044872","doi":"10.1016/j.marpol.2005.11.001","title":"Global scope and economics of illegal fishing","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marine Policy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":271,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Pew Charitable Trusts","keywords":"Fishing; Scope (computer science); Business; Cost–benefit analysis; Key (lock); Economics; Fishery; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.018345201134741782,"score_gpt":0.22442066523398813,"score_spread":0.20607546409924635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981044872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8464547,0.0054424107,0.007562884,0.014107361,0.00005178686,0.000022041824,0.00045450774,0.00002582402,0.1258785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996756,0.0010421517,0.00016466889,0.00015379922,0.000055709235,0.0000046262717,0.000039125796,0.0000047807057,0.0017791197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995653,0.00017430796,0.000014346587,0.000053622036,0.00008877498,0.00010363307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933161,0.00458186,0.0009597809,0.00020091153,0.00043857214,0.0005028547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013352475,0.0001503859,0.00032178024,0.0017438701,0.0005680995,0.0027317605,0.0003454899,0.0013969896,0.005013875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007325271,0.0002462427,0.0003305691,0.0013145924,0.003240499,0.0029122143,0.0014165585,0.0014324712,0.00014248537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014498614,0.00010485873,0.077438004,0.00010604896,0.00013790981,0.00050971116,0.0006273639,0.048348933,0.00053949194,0.850009,0.0032138757,0.01881989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037810227,0.000059539445,0.11827165,0.00014817016,0.0000919235,0.0002470493,0.0018985379,0.026757313,0.00021411391,0.84541494,0.0068277204,0.000031213094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009472366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015209475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009472366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018800102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008131395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018834472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981086231","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.286282","title":"The Dynamics of Law Clerk Matching: An Experimental and Computational Investigation of Proposals for Reform of the Market","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Economics; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.016312632788777478,"score_gpt":0.22736067582300248,"score_spread":0.211048043034225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981086231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95544094,0.00020052744,0.01448453,0.0057313573,0.000099613484,0.00019177046,0.00039159993,0.00013841614,0.023321234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948021,0.00007327812,0.002886326,0.0002651171,0.000031040694,0.00006261095,0.00013932663,0.000030021183,0.0017100915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716055,0.0017590715,0.00010966934,0.00036957688,0.00033923195,0.0002618376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8898531,0.094328865,0.006248562,0.0057103843,0.00192413,0.0019348505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008160485,0.00028838942,0.00097541587,0.00068181247,0.0015488879,0.0041140886,0.002309894,0.0029839892,0.027157702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10593807,0.0005233587,0.00052338245,0.0010116088,0.0026075097,0.0073935944,0.0015625055,0.0038928252,0.0010428082],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029132823,0.0033743624,0.018905392,0.00046240646,0.00017270695,0.00024123193,0.0033821408,0.055704094,0.0042260094,0.85470396,0.019243157,0.03667133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014061969,0.00050620624,0.008580602,0.000053053423,0.00012248603,0.000094975825,0.002576183,0.510554,0.0024726936,0.46834806,0.005203095,0.00008245507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045193247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004689243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027157702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022913816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025509016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090851545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981712407","doi":"10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00028.x","title":"Work‐related perks, agency problems, and optimal incentive contracts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Corporate governance; Business; Autonomy; Agency (philosophy); Consumption (sociology); Work (physics); Offset (computer science); Agency cost; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Public economics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.0364354885996242,"score_gpt":0.19298914472251325,"score_spread":0.15655365612288905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981712407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4937329,0.0039672474,0.33364338,0.019074617,0.0002892698,0.00042141188,0.0005638996,0.00018409127,0.14812312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9711639,0.000738987,0.017480308,0.0003581539,0.00013037874,0.00020174093,0.00007943631,0.000030336714,0.0098167015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915764,0.0054201614,0.00037169235,0.00072443526,0.00075842737,0.0011489729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96135414,0.027263993,0.0058323303,0.0018934876,0.0011723142,0.0024838138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010919762,0.0008338002,0.0015941975,0.0012215385,0.0021432391,0.003976834,0.0017789892,0.0041162656,0.011939218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04499895,0.00085681665,0.00077210146,0.0013546118,0.004500584,0.005689364,0.002357965,0.0038610776,0.00059834705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019607342,0.0002361707,0.0028992328,0.00009883196,0.000041588286,0.00018385977,0.00029046196,0.044025864,0.00030987497,0.92544025,0.002644718,0.023632921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010335536,0.0000629942,0.0015649797,0.000040990442,0.000015685835,0.00010666133,0.00021403722,0.04690653,0.00013710497,0.94786274,0.0029612558,0.000023603123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020193926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001835826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011939218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003789657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003204431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057749927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982723547","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.658481","title":"Plea Bargaining with Budgetary Constraints","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.013224511928426488,"score_gpt":0.19460724322686102,"score_spread":0.18138273129843452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982723547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064710036,0.0049891253,0.3727957,0.025099738,0.00089367206,0.00033212258,0.0007712778,0.00028510622,0.5301232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83193463,0.0017707874,0.019508138,0.0020615393,0.0013013756,0.00048382248,0.0002744385,0.00008608596,0.14257918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99118876,0.005005413,0.00033235966,0.0012168706,0.0008814153,0.0013751051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809124,0.015577176,0.0011422221,0.0009813454,0.0006089476,0.00077786256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009833129,0.0013348598,0.0029712939,0.0014894238,0.002973005,0.008655812,0.0024077846,0.009450032,0.041787367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03410902,0.0015493163,0.0014942745,0.0023253972,0.0037468583,0.008888991,0.003369343,0.007518113,0.005250021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078739846,0.000048750495,0.00020347354,0.00005005019,0.000027491387,0.00016303765,0.00011676838,0.010756161,0.00008669185,0.97759056,0.0052224346,0.0056558633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092583534,0.000024418707,0.00017867962,0.000033156655,0.00002015757,0.00007546041,0.0000795031,0.022208055,0.00006812717,0.9715645,0.0056375125,0.000017765766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026673249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037749864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041787367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036142853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002726367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13979262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982967363","doi":"10.7202/050432ar","title":"Criteria in Arbitration of Wage Disputes: Theory and Practice in the Canadian Federal Public Service","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.044509357323891614,"score_gpt":0.2508899536397878,"score_spread":0.20638059631589617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982967363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35792688,0.025033511,0.115186,0.06480436,0.0005944473,0.0013736434,0.00033762018,0.00019825742,0.4345453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96124476,0.0022027243,0.019701803,0.0005258556,0.00006689036,0.00018447792,0.000054994918,0.000038518432,0.015979987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96219593,0.016692463,0.0018475145,0.0021585538,0.012253374,0.004852147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9507404,0.032377705,0.0022723412,0.0016247025,0.0106992405,0.002285675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0440984,0.0007061377,0.0012749692,0.0092674615,0.021578794,0.019526916,0.004614158,0.005970103,0.0061208834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09264075,0.00083073543,0.00081347977,0.013035493,0.03257687,0.0065056714,0.006042534,0.003106525,0.0004284677],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044048607,0.00004054853,0.003477655,0.00012190789,0.00001147805,0.000102894315,0.01766526,0.0041982885,0.00007787505,0.9283565,0.0047535584,0.04115005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013115509,0.00008377211,0.01531077,0.0010447853,0.000051969866,0.0001494693,0.046904564,0.034015227,0.000673525,0.70711863,0.19426109,0.00025502482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92052096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92078626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8509871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14901294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14230469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98702437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983887152","doi":"10.1111/1468-0335.00241","title":"Optimal At‐will Labour Contracts","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economica","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National University of Singapore","keywords":"Enforcement; Labour law; Economics; Economic Justice; Labour economics; Law and economics; Employment contract; Law; Business; Microeconomics; Political science; Work (physics); Engineering","score_opus":0.021723057201527864,"score_gpt":0.20140333786290518,"score_spread":0.1796802806613773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983887152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20069073,0.0015531856,0.11768183,0.009573158,0.00039386845,0.00033396174,0.0010769175,0.00018591709,0.66851056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9418569,0.0009244358,0.014960458,0.0007653054,0.00015878282,0.00018273122,0.00022819654,0.000064170825,0.040858995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572444,0.0011263257,0.00032603517,0.00069394655,0.00093887246,0.0011903009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99493647,0.002048767,0.00077146606,0.00082570594,0.0008219842,0.00059569353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040604654,0.00055332767,0.0009358248,0.0006540025,0.0020581344,0.0043451246,0.0013803869,0.0034037284,0.01803527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017132105,0.0007178717,0.00057064573,0.00069578824,0.0027983433,0.0049915235,0.0025525873,0.0024019296,0.0024086242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003709513,0.000031877826,0.00032814592,0.000030196374,0.000007272262,0.000044862645,0.00012776595,0.004721173,0.00016418307,0.98534435,0.0040092384,0.005153925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054307813,0.000028668495,0.0006448333,0.000054524684,0.000016462463,0.00007861609,0.00029103705,0.02015644,0.00021156562,0.9657708,0.012677853,0.000014929081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039033084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038178402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01803527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029934878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004819561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060333967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984607228","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1516337","title":"Legal Liability When Individuals Have Moral Concerns","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Business; Legal liability; Law and economics; Law; Psychology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.025695722108902346,"score_gpt":0.23208856668448796,"score_spread":0.20639284457558563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984607228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6094864,0.0021906903,0.036445443,0.06291339,0.0005930549,0.00015061241,0.00031968497,0.000097104414,0.2878037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918967,0.00023594401,0.0011548277,0.0015723684,0.00029676766,0.000022094011,0.00003267392,0.0000051270194,0.004783543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960007,0.0014444747,0.0002820945,0.00046794396,0.0006360491,0.0011686345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782963,0.012622137,0.0038770598,0.0020619882,0.0012358562,0.0019065891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051409034,0.00023270125,0.00064364605,0.0012992244,0.0021910383,0.0034987472,0.0007863853,0.00770566,0.0116981855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03823267,0.00028343903,0.0005018789,0.0007105982,0.004157351,0.0032757262,0.0025244013,0.0033945178,0.000832104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024401041,0.0004818189,0.057089217,0.00014776962,0.00010022422,0.0127813,0.005439626,0.0018486448,0.0008154161,0.84640694,0.025331205,0.049313925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010375448,0.000106199346,0.0106122205,0.0001499915,0.00007492501,0.009069265,0.0027404143,0.0042862818,0.0005440978,0.9557565,0.016519973,0.000036402078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001178279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013504821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0116981855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076104875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016901233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039134324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986471037","doi":"10.1108/02686900010353980","title":"Auditor liability to third parties: an international focus","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Managerial Auditing Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Liability; Audit; Accounting; Business; Limited liability partnership; Legal liability; Limiting; Auditor independence; Strict liability; Auditor's report; Political science; Law; Internal audit; Joint audit","score_opus":0.022162043198112408,"score_gpt":0.22659803708911316,"score_spread":0.20443599389100076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986471037","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09290627,0.3604998,0.003543669,0.10850228,0.0009820393,0.000031104522,0.000092950526,0.000046084242,0.4333957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7660016,0.2015575,0.001728926,0.011409334,0.0017783717,0.000037007158,0.00009094375,0.00004439758,0.017351985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735534,0.0008864027,0.00021511891,0.00030375537,0.00073203683,0.00050736434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792107,0.0088089,0.0060249674,0.0010697113,0.003916332,0.0009694573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004368077,0.00030659686,0.00035478154,0.0044132634,0.001678113,0.0048287245,0.00064380554,0.0033453687,0.003712833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0089329425,0.00017672425,0.0005729508,0.006409713,0.0047993376,0.0037664836,0.0022850414,0.0036263464,0.0003713741],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097388,0.0001497366,0.019408202,0.00075274095,0.000050623825,0.0010852218,0.0044300444,0.00060705794,0.0008963136,0.69496477,0.022929931,0.25462812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027236509,0.00023383308,0.084643364,0.005413756,0.00013018346,0.0060982956,0.0050050197,0.00082674745,0.0023592352,0.060794324,0.8344004,0.0000675908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010884119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008860519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010884119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004109297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045755752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029815137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986829511","doi":"10.1016/s0167-6296(00)00058-8","title":"Does the economics of moral hazard need to be revisited? A comment on the paper by John Nyman","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Health Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Moral hazard; Economics; Positive economics; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Incentive","score_opus":0.05133217029296365,"score_gpt":0.24513003461221286,"score_spread":0.19379786431924922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986829511","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010144504,0.0005677373,0.00007281526,0.99456847,0.0033387654,0.0000030137537,0.000025550642,0.0000044194576,0.0013177787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017192658,0.00045688933,0.0000844879,0.9826601,0.011681222,0.000017154971,0.00000940388,0.000015122933,0.0033562833],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879941,0.0037013434,0.0010266204,0.0018270753,0.0039407997,0.0015099585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9277495,0.057632647,0.0029928428,0.0013815017,0.007428864,0.002814601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01816139,0.0013166124,0.0035461648,0.0016392096,0.008366251,0.011927002,0.007711759,0.14898849,0.011312442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088820636,0.0017217376,0.0028519267,0.0019158716,0.012688477,0.014691708,0.0039132377,0.11343064,0.0069005536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060290575,0.000023341137,0.0002778425,0.00007800803,0.000025639625,0.0003981319,0.00040177413,0.00008934118,0.00006843111,0.04433125,0.95169985,0.0025460704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030511245,0.0000493234,0.0017881719,0.0009465889,0.00011412794,0.00039013388,0.0017648337,0.0009947541,0.00038644313,0.116287515,0.8767619,0.00021110933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051985294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06321366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14898849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009116139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012421966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10336542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987406593","doi":"10.1506/e023-337t-180p-18u4","title":"Auditor Liability and Business Investment*","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Audit; Business; Strict liability; Limited liability partnership; Limited liability; Actuarial science; Accounting; Legal liability; Liability insurance; Incentive; Finance; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07092396819867695,"score_gpt":0.2762818972655436,"score_spread":0.20535792906686662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987406593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8825217,0.001595306,0.062740654,0.005355202,0.000060034727,0.00010333378,0.0003557861,0.00017523942,0.047092713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938013,0.00023844006,0.00085607794,0.000034254434,0.000017816885,0.000015229595,0.000039425184,0.000006251423,0.004991252],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779797,0.0010153232,0.00010540082,0.0001985467,0.00031656676,0.00056627725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98702,0.006842979,0.0040514166,0.00052125554,0.0005545994,0.0010097232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028892679,0.0005564163,0.0005310931,0.0008445406,0.0005856943,0.003415615,0.0008017019,0.0018429102,0.004702497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013806722,0.00043548667,0.0002991919,0.00083322,0.001797621,0.002301737,0.0011805001,0.0013938334,0.0005281203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037213246,0.0004462782,0.048241418,0.00010014663,0.000099516365,0.0007859663,0.0005356883,0.6490704,0.0013644922,0.27377152,0.0022932661,0.022919249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014693083,0.00043373668,0.02821979,0.00017579383,0.00010237899,0.00058809534,0.0004314022,0.73510534,0.0018160044,0.2228263,0.010045243,0.000108987064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005697316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034459876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005697316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029348945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001621062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021294177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988209702","doi":"10.1108/13590790510735294","title":"The Canadian response to the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act: managing police resources; a competency‐based approach to staffing","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Crime","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Staffing; Business; Misconduct; White-collar crime; Law enforcement; Human resources; Human resource management; Public relations; Management; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.024635230515597725,"score_gpt":0.2205147340820729,"score_spread":0.19587950356647515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988209702","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071255006,0.013067371,0.0040725335,0.5587503,0.0031971915,0.00044819896,0.0012239075,0.00014304563,0.34784257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66963637,0.011228615,0.009040025,0.074091785,0.00065969786,0.00020307959,0.0004843232,0.00010067156,0.23455536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941233,0.0007356613,0.00015585152,0.0002595036,0.0027254096,0.0020002543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933774,0.0010018761,0.0003595822,0.00015240959,0.0034298752,0.0016787582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003932194,0.0005692529,0.00021524105,0.0020404817,0.02397368,0.0059078955,0.0029093411,0.005818095,0.0051192297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0114253815,0.00048128713,0.00034096252,0.002135705,0.006657973,0.00160853,0.002401683,0.0054998505,0.0005159449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037978425,0.00006567079,0.009981745,0.00022799434,0.000020817366,0.000977238,0.02474942,0.001675289,0.00054748135,0.29379812,0.5922518,0.07566643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023066365,0.000029745206,0.055758614,0.0003638472,0.000025508652,0.0001873962,0.030366765,0.0010317707,0.0005391102,0.006351244,0.90516376,0.00015917324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99711585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99893075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13754952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13754952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2717361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988531281","doi":"10.7202/043174ar","title":"Ordre normatif interne et organisations","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.012812786893873976,"score_gpt":0.20378444587650718,"score_spread":0.1909716589826332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988531281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12334616,0.010002877,0.097908646,0.03606416,0.0006020988,0.00010326506,0.00023139355,0.00014190662,0.73159945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94750196,0.005092462,0.011141809,0.0015355195,0.0004564629,0.00013658946,0.0000972971,0.0000650929,0.03397287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907086,0.0048443456,0.00039831005,0.0009836312,0.0022757128,0.00078932056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98747987,0.0064346124,0.0025008982,0.0011140637,0.0018899728,0.0005805625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066828826,0.000413415,0.00048300327,0.0016581954,0.003046043,0.011550252,0.00097276404,0.0024215726,0.009285894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012976364,0.00025852423,0.0004374712,0.002652039,0.01885395,0.007933703,0.003322161,0.0036220227,0.0007933495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057862253,0.0000064914793,0.00076225295,0.000030916854,0.0000039517417,0.00002005863,0.001829991,0.00023913386,0.000055825913,0.9926549,0.00050504017,0.0038855888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001719504,0.00004893023,0.0073765223,0.00035926083,0.000017923103,0.0001734848,0.008495946,0.0018264634,0.0005190772,0.81278765,0.16833152,0.000046050158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009263684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008053282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011550252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060357964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061138733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043792903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W198864359","doi":"","title":"Alcohol and third parties: \"dram shop liability\" and beyond","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Vicarious liability; Third party; Indemnity; Commonwealth; Legislature; Liability; Business; Legal liability; Law; Strict liability; Liability insurance; Delict; Law and economics; Political science; Private law; Economics; Comparative law; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.06464988670168405,"score_gpt":0.34201717415978394,"score_spread":0.2773672874580999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W198864359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21912697,0.035271633,0.01958576,0.2138713,0.0008647021,0.00007235485,0.0001220068,0.00008624714,0.51099896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94540673,0.008199962,0.0014501647,0.020131089,0.00071173505,0.00003861778,0.000039777427,0.000018135972,0.024003895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963586,0.0017835039,0.0001260457,0.00023925888,0.0007356081,0.00075701927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896735,0.0072204215,0.0013789611,0.00044686734,0.0008399132,0.00044039165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003268563,0.00022231946,0.00033103777,0.0023745615,0.0036823591,0.0046716635,0.0009965796,0.006929907,0.004246627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009423809,0.00026245945,0.0007115229,0.0017491857,0.014391247,0.0071302173,0.0040921527,0.0041105794,0.00036674843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008982124,0.000041312254,0.0030418523,0.000025855803,0.0000068783397,0.00046432228,0.0019280289,0.0003725686,0.000055537766,0.97646195,0.008228508,0.009364249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018605833,0.00009215269,0.022842988,0.00085400534,0.000049522336,0.0014522333,0.012950703,0.0029239338,0.000742545,0.71760255,0.24037549,0.00009531498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02475557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039238945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02475557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056650206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004022558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049222946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990394113","doi":"10.1097/01.icu.0000193096.90679.30","title":"Pain and suffering disability index","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Personal injury; Tort; Pain and suffering; Medicine; Damages; Tort reform; Plaintiff; Punitive damages; Medical malpractice; Wrongful death; Jury; Malpractice; Physical therapy; Liability; Law","score_opus":0.061724702366011346,"score_gpt":0.28833843783809443,"score_spread":0.22661373547208308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990394113","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007407197,0.9841158,0.00037181648,0.0027961163,0.001153277,0.0001368928,0.0011586976,0.000018689547,0.009508046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018759621,0.97053176,0.0007843247,0.0019516154,0.002269795,0.00021934767,0.0018945711,0.000015269645,0.003573677],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983683,0.00042306457,0.00031492574,0.00015506547,0.0006511748,0.00008749794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933925,0.0030471135,0.0013796708,0.000118369,0.0018462582,0.00021603757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019402012,0.00060955645,0.0022751107,0.0039610113,0.000259541,0.0020469949,0.0012540711,0.0008659612,0.01668655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01307687,0.00016165813,0.000995755,0.004240671,0.0004947876,0.0010544042,0.0005718498,0.0009130716,0.0046251565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025288537,0.00007152605,0.004187742,0.03683472,0.00050016394,0.00020939617,0.000041099654,0.00029855987,0.00011712805,0.0028834827,0.17251018,0.78209317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020492928,0.0003506985,0.03564011,0.043915365,0.0012927742,0.0032410098,0.00012456324,0.00037064537,0.00029077698,0.003069936,0.91143996,0.000059258367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026011704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027444814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01668655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011866931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032031378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055822074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990397999","doi":"10.7202/019795ar","title":"La sécurité du consommateur au Québec… deux solitudes : mesures préventives et sanctions civiles des atteintes à la sécurité","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.012850652658881396,"score_gpt":0.23032279093993405,"score_spread":0.21747213828105266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990397999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8371757,0.0021094938,0.0029972878,0.009447652,0.00007577857,0.00007732639,0.0003339514,0.00005071019,0.14773214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.963224,0.00046784425,0.000663098,0.00049944996,0.000010233081,0.000028718878,0.00008160418,0.000008082444,0.035016883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877363,0.00027392647,0.000029814979,0.00013217397,0.00038011634,0.00041030665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806815,0.00024651538,0.0003158641,0.0000877995,0.00076636375,0.0005153358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010129503,0.00023716834,0.00021642147,0.0007938285,0.005807959,0.002812847,0.00067492307,0.000812959,0.009241081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023469834,0.00020070923,0.00018704847,0.001172699,0.003502746,0.0008988334,0.0014238653,0.0014909038,0.00038096655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022285528,0.0002238943,0.25027642,0.00039931902,0.00017719607,0.0008361522,0.14031957,0.0023816293,0.005358978,0.34519485,0.019776843,0.23483233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025914564,0.00014784983,0.6978467,0.0005101814,0.00009683744,0.00015144711,0.053830914,0.0017447004,0.0012299214,0.00626396,0.23803048,0.0001210692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9562034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9850241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0437966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030312141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045420676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.219931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991762711","doi":"10.1515/gj-2014-0012","title":"The Limits of Probabilistic Causality in Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Causality (physics); Probabilistic logic; Law; Economics; Political science; Econometrics; Law and economics; Computer science; Physics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.056658266419569024,"score_gpt":0.2553950981125519,"score_spread":0.19873683169298287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991762711","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093835756,0.015061859,0.52750903,0.0954459,0.001214859,0.00014800535,0.00055469753,0.00045895088,0.26577088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979832,0.0016945144,0.014157185,0.0018025405,0.0006048223,0.000078893594,0.000056073943,0.00005304521,0.0017208592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96881694,0.018309582,0.0013947595,0.0029154965,0.007376269,0.0011869014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8144397,0.15053052,0.010285721,0.0108080525,0.011755689,0.0021802923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03687779,0.0007069592,0.0016518068,0.005697035,0.0030701505,0.010509249,0.0022863508,0.005021066,0.01205821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13997537,0.0008056037,0.001220476,0.0032237081,0.034866765,0.021573348,0.00656867,0.007268632,0.00084285316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010148034,0.000009350911,0.00047914116,0.000043493383,0.000013552658,0.000028692593,0.00009640976,0.0016119572,0.000021249873,0.9935127,0.000445875,0.0037274545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038131616,0.000002167275,0.000090710826,0.0000244109,0.0000029215146,0.000011826968,0.000028233226,0.0016181621,0.000018282955,0.9975938,0.0006016684,0.0000040346017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029687888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013282449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03687779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004915196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033063751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19503075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992139380","doi":"10.7202/045637ar","title":"Alive and Kicking — The Story of Lesion and the Civil Code of Québec","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Legitimacy; Civil procedure; Code (set theory); Law; Civil code; Order (exchange); Economic Justice; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Computer science; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.024371544796968025,"score_gpt":0.18504055059345684,"score_spread":0.16066900579648882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992139380","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09249614,0.020346183,0.0010820711,0.55000925,0.0012981188,0.00003796187,0.0009194328,0.00005301886,0.33375776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8913496,0.004829023,0.0002784167,0.030016009,0.00046478634,0.00002313973,0.0001506855,0.00004538695,0.072842956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749833,0.00059804757,0.000028532993,0.00018593682,0.00059817766,0.001091055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649256,0.0011229746,0.00018812322,0.00015964531,0.0013323413,0.0007042374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016997877,0.00024124705,0.00030617215,0.0010242908,0.01851627,0.009759616,0.0017014731,0.005015269,0.008967566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066477414,0.0002679236,0.00029779176,0.0017288193,0.012703861,0.0029999758,0.0016767324,0.0067770686,0.00047211986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056256977,0.000038643877,0.0049636285,0.000039567836,0.000026938902,0.000735934,0.013303271,0.00080284127,0.00012652256,0.7360169,0.22402346,0.019865997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004686192,0.0000306086,0.02199465,0.00038187762,0.000039627328,0.00023098451,0.022645576,0.001878121,0.00019215861,0.061156645,0.89125293,0.00014985637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9894405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10576297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10576297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053494148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76736766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992276053","doi":"10.1007/s10058-008-0050-y","title":"On the optimality of nonmaximal fines in the presence of corruptible law enforcers","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economic Design","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Koç Üniversitesi; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European University Institute","keywords":"Economics; Enforcement; Language change; Contrast (vision); Law enforcement; Law; Microeconomics; Law and economics; Physics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10129731793392711,"score_gpt":0.26201804203376106,"score_spread":0.16072072409983396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992276053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33191878,0.016701983,0.32949337,0.0616865,0.0011669826,0.0003584982,0.002285789,0.00037058993,0.25601748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97129345,0.0034247283,0.014262974,0.0014461101,0.00095141825,0.000098438686,0.0002250078,0.000077530836,0.008220294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98612785,0.006198657,0.0011360039,0.001944138,0.0024611307,0.0021321198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8836119,0.09904221,0.007615419,0.0040358645,0.0038675435,0.0018270323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018878119,0.0010667198,0.0054397755,0.0014901714,0.0021911114,0.0064127836,0.004070594,0.008147161,0.007884815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07354063,0.0017983913,0.0015149949,0.0014390416,0.009872204,0.009489405,0.0030943647,0.008073462,0.00071789266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014082568,0.00008148561,0.0012273163,0.00018425482,0.000081666185,0.00016367283,0.00015227699,0.02675645,0.00027723835,0.9600365,0.0033282484,0.007570083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005730432,0.000037998783,0.00080706686,0.000052182102,0.000019904328,0.000037502537,0.000052728927,0.012888765,0.00009899694,0.9847925,0.0011400706,0.0000149915695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053912755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044787475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018878119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004681018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005936171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0998382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992672804","doi":"10.7202/050811ar","title":"Time Delays in Grievance Arbitration","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Arbitration; Section (typography); Business; Dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Advertising","score_opus":0.027879952690205205,"score_gpt":0.20966481530944944,"score_spread":0.18178486261924423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992672804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92184705,0.009215599,0.01843014,0.00890639,0.0004356592,0.00013493055,0.00057946966,0.00008537161,0.04036547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996289,0.0005900652,0.0007225184,0.00009819126,0.000071972594,0.000015928143,0.00007702292,0.000009685188,0.0021255752],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98415405,0.0046673827,0.0013844337,0.0013865446,0.0053782784,0.0030293711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8205592,0.100913,0.056897566,0.0036565256,0.012106075,0.005867611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022158332,0.00020204061,0.000426739,0.002607475,0.0017398007,0.0035137185,0.0015255808,0.0012848557,0.010059403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17399284,0.00040710057,0.00034726484,0.002112407,0.0015472767,0.0048266468,0.0025809987,0.0031083818,0.00095165253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019069606,0.00066105364,0.50448257,0.0004924957,0.0002825683,0.002346547,0.020100703,0.02678266,0.0017060165,0.1948959,0.009896379,0.23644613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002799073,0.0012181414,0.6486952,0.0007335058,0.000206911,0.0027385768,0.03236249,0.023382017,0.0032561375,0.17509326,0.111709364,0.0003245508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022062764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03003185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022158332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040787966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032417714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11718589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993168171","doi":"10.1506/cxby-2nxt-dvwc-2tjr","title":"Earnings Management to Minimize Superfund Clean‐up and Transaction Costs*","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Superfund; Incentive; Accrual; Earnings; Business; Liability; Identification (biology); Earnings management; Transaction cost; Database transaction; Actuarial science; Finance; Accounting; Economics; Microeconomics; Hazardous waste; Engineering","score_opus":0.07612468062063418,"score_gpt":0.2886634340899427,"score_spread":0.21253875346930853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993168171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788729,0.00021431009,0.006019312,0.0010836937,0.000013584878,0.00009807565,0.00004762008,0.000043865115,0.013606655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980108,0.000030549945,0.00094648433,0.000045135,0.000013063663,0.0000125427305,0.000013016755,0.0000015622718,0.00092680444],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995329,0.0015842017,0.00029308232,0.0004160633,0.0016266173,0.0007510926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95421565,0.009511106,0.029891716,0.0025085753,0.0026351684,0.0012377617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062176376,0.00019875001,0.00027770485,0.0012975971,0.0011767381,0.0017469734,0.0008444243,0.00080948626,0.002154407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026040856,0.00013724677,0.00020766973,0.0008042579,0.0011749482,0.001249034,0.0010691773,0.00068397576,0.0002674132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006035666,0.0014762759,0.59810174,0.00014918207,0.00015003957,0.0011428989,0.002904851,0.024539564,0.016811185,0.042359393,0.0056454903,0.30611578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015806357,0.0015418347,0.87702894,0.00010706607,0.00013239178,0.0008551268,0.003757438,0.036642965,0.020193754,0.038652755,0.020786613,0.00014317094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003053016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053031426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062176376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017471752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024673503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032882452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993324553","doi":"10.1506/dd01-gwp2-cm4y-c7jk","title":"Disclosure and Recognition Requirements: Corporate Investment Decisions with Externalities*","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Accrual; Shareholder; Dividend; Business; Limited liability; Externality; Incentive; Investment (military); Joint and several liability; Actuarial science; Liability insurance; Finance; Strict liability; Economics; Microeconomics; Corporate governance; Law","score_opus":0.2583283319729981,"score_gpt":0.31293827941732444,"score_spread":0.054609947444326346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993324553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9675478,0.00055705494,0.0036128797,0.0023647633,0.000035881978,0.000115818395,0.0001555003,0.000026882588,0.02558354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854124,0.00008668098,0.00030668188,0.00012984428,0.000022323573,0.00001703906,0.00003526634,0.0000020071357,0.0008587832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902828,0.004465478,0.0008685435,0.0006944154,0.0014717103,0.0022171254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8275364,0.11847455,0.041785203,0.0047020875,0.0038228102,0.0036789775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014689051,0.00042372596,0.0010451906,0.00064309203,0.0008455217,0.004564012,0.00074837165,0.003040651,0.0065285303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07109181,0.000398477,0.0005044415,0.0006231786,0.0018667883,0.0027685,0.0020667973,0.0028789327,0.00057146215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008263947,0.0032372354,0.30741942,0.000665919,0.00043854193,0.0038941246,0.0018581637,0.19888856,0.01737524,0.31534427,0.006300334,0.1363142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010757877,0.0046302318,0.49618894,0.0004687638,0.00071299466,0.0016738639,0.0028620448,0.18273678,0.02265448,0.26550037,0.02099859,0.00049710344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015536634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001874868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014689051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021534837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013637007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077683985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994440430","doi":"10.7202/043414ar","title":"La gradation de la culpabilité morale et des formes de risque de préjudice dans le cadre de la répression de la tentative","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.010988192954972394,"score_gpt":0.2391403159890332,"score_spread":0.22815212303406082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994440430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7558149,0.0015580261,0.011611601,0.005733175,0.00011562999,0.000046588113,0.000055656248,0.00003822685,0.2250262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901018,0.00027969145,0.00065921905,0.00014436149,0.000019160287,0.000018148296,0.000009944133,0.000009578194,0.008758177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979996,0.00074584887,0.00005154417,0.00016906034,0.0006244645,0.00040951621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739933,0.0007761199,0.0008391917,0.00023223489,0.00038370374,0.00036941114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021443397,0.00037081147,0.00025384134,0.00092482875,0.0019794106,0.0040779775,0.00070936955,0.0010008329,0.006152534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004687325,0.00017232787,0.00034361923,0.00078962743,0.010438913,0.0016088983,0.003683141,0.0025899468,0.0004077583],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020788936,0.0001440598,0.055259228,0.00021511017,0.000047953505,0.0005760931,0.09822569,0.0011507333,0.0039310926,0.77901,0.0010613044,0.06017089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053668788,0.0005026603,0.43164662,0.0005249242,0.00011670718,0.0014804084,0.13012981,0.002262431,0.006789297,0.2968351,0.12945369,0.00020478127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046604467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056555597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006152534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029417973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019934685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021344364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994990530","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.893604","title":"Liability Rules under Evidentiary Uncertainty","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Business; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Law; Accounting; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.014254546796633757,"score_gpt":0.21057838430976913,"score_spread":0.19632383751313537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994990530","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.270281,0.0028779272,0.51171845,0.022757072,0.0003236259,0.0001817212,0.0009942404,0.00026837486,0.19059771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786254,0.00047718658,0.014483048,0.00068202364,0.0004093713,0.00006140326,0.00012387415,0.00001999416,0.005117683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891777,0.0034047745,0.0012503606,0.0016599315,0.0035698935,0.000937264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93481934,0.047787007,0.0058771367,0.005806107,0.00472635,0.0009839733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01283663,0.00033980192,0.0010289748,0.0013732716,0.0016340641,0.0066823545,0.0017743532,0.004211255,0.0028518196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06363596,0.0006630101,0.0008178194,0.00089124264,0.0044253645,0.006206593,0.0018936647,0.0046779397,0.0007047971],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001246962,0.000012610618,0.00045105242,0.000015811256,0.0000113514225,0.000112040834,0.00014442111,0.0036869023,0.00008658786,0.9906599,0.0012193652,0.003587412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010124104,0.000004948127,0.00030984767,0.000012770829,0.000008088191,0.000075076874,0.000021537964,0.007986688,0.000075879245,0.99041593,0.001072001,0.000007112838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018360434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001641432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01283663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019946499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002477497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067887425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995858509","doi":"10.1111/j.1755-618x.2004.tb02168.x","title":"Gender Implications of Wrongful Dismissal Judgments in Canada, 1994–2002*","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Humanities; Unfair dismissal; Political science; Sociology; Ethnology; Law; Art","score_opus":0.06419056928932036,"score_gpt":0.238389388240296,"score_spread":0.17419881895097566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995858509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94021475,0.0027939894,0.00023765808,0.016266543,0.00024774493,0.00009541923,0.0019356775,0.000028575338,0.038179655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983157,0.0007155609,0.00014698421,0.0013353033,0.000029534925,0.00002087321,0.0002987172,0.000013780833,0.014282273],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99128,0.0005192367,0.00026057757,0.00055505603,0.0038509087,0.0035341887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817535,0.0030703533,0.0025653811,0.00042709318,0.009353913,0.0028296104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044116504,0.00032577824,0.0006850943,0.0025352777,0.020401843,0.0058800513,0.0022551795,0.0024515558,0.0043291175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024641665,0.000467245,0.00047005844,0.0055370447,0.004394297,0.0011084239,0.0028929668,0.0030558622,0.0003181694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011776917,0.0003192918,0.6480365,0.00029499742,0.00020586992,0.002958628,0.1452583,0.0017977157,0.0016389395,0.042708453,0.054530833,0.1010728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057189878,0.000082973216,0.7879856,0.00020729114,0.00010669772,0.00024213747,0.10884539,0.0012636724,0.0010894197,0.0020193225,0.09792697,0.00017336018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99921286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17372793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17372793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1582092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95835847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997073286","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2009.00080.x","title":"Efficiency out of disorder: Contested ownership in incomplete contracts","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Incomplete contracts; Inefficiency; Equity (law); Business; Microeconomics; CONTEST; Transaction cost; Database transaction; Investment (military); Economics; Incentive; Industrial organization","score_opus":0.041256443853622496,"score_gpt":0.22231432312074417,"score_spread":0.1810578792671217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997073286","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39115444,0.0015856599,0.43229052,0.009116032,0.00014201591,0.0002766238,0.00026001793,0.00014685412,0.16502781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892356,0.00025579822,0.005717663,0.00021063372,0.00008008826,0.00008023612,0.000029908593,0.00003193944,0.0043580816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99076605,0.004591427,0.00041570014,0.0010210709,0.0016560644,0.0015496338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9537719,0.031652723,0.006003305,0.005060417,0.0017529927,0.001758671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011186698,0.00042614166,0.0015652403,0.0010986954,0.0019418751,0.0054377583,0.0017350619,0.0026280605,0.0069906125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042847726,0.00059468934,0.0012528206,0.0009779936,0.01185521,0.009309371,0.0047394135,0.0037116036,0.0004405267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026215199,0.00001741114,0.00057163945,0.000021925563,0.000012404826,0.00016969291,0.00027463277,0.006978963,0.00017506903,0.9896554,0.0003900429,0.0017066261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038760678,0.000017022516,0.0003203971,0.000020616231,0.000009025549,0.00007463454,0.00017530115,0.025401598,0.00012963053,0.9724337,0.0013680959,0.000011161212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002767038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00150882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011186698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033319471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023517713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059161663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998139205","doi":"10.1111/1540-5982.00136","title":"A model of evidence production and optimal standard of proof and penalty in criminal trials","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Acquittal; Conviction; Reasonable doubt; Law; Production (economics); Criminal procedure; Economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.4394301385301838,"score_gpt":0.23244915350983827,"score_spread":0.20698098502034554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998139205","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17307417,0.0030754497,0.7129929,0.015783736,0.00040620923,0.00061941484,0.0029840197,0.0006465713,0.09041749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8365812,0.0022792248,0.0566298,0.0006484563,0.00026652263,0.00095291995,0.00079596136,0.00020553263,0.10164048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953548,0.002018074,0.00025603772,0.00091193215,0.00053103524,0.00092816935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688231,0.024763372,0.0023130085,0.0008701193,0.0018387176,0.0013916546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006497802,0.0019041164,0.0027996541,0.0017870348,0.0016608719,0.0068938187,0.004186766,0.0075021656,0.018873995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028144019,0.0019482364,0.0018538823,0.0020592199,0.0061469707,0.006821635,0.0027436542,0.0049600373,0.00274887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034408586,0.0001520639,0.001168645,0.0001827215,0.0000466932,0.00061416137,0.00034151447,0.44430667,0.0010168477,0.54122114,0.0023182137,0.008287243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022688141,0.0001755773,0.0007652689,0.000088102366,0.00004209368,0.00015360343,0.00012196903,0.6754258,0.00027697167,0.32034034,0.002290248,0.000093113056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014952612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070946617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018873995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00653198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004250482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063139796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000032503","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100009765","title":"Rightsizing Regulation: The Competition Act, 1975–2005","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Queen's University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Concurrence; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018213031149726066,"score_gpt":0.21221488838415434,"score_spread":0.19400185723442828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000032503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10433481,0.013821271,0.002685806,0.052671116,0.0007803632,0.00019764742,0.0035723236,0.00010541216,0.8218313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66461915,0.005709498,0.0022168476,0.017712666,0.00029097244,0.00020717664,0.0017997304,0.0000561919,0.30738774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99158466,0.00072816503,0.0002488546,0.000700698,0.004754676,0.0019828794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937517,0.0015624322,0.0007856032,0.00032885675,0.002811064,0.00076035224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031533362,0.00024903988,0.0002620204,0.0023564256,0.005586745,0.0061518895,0.0010724278,0.0022333008,0.010587858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011893221,0.0002943088,0.00031861832,0.004823597,0.004197099,0.0014595365,0.0016333121,0.00298743,0.0008108075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004444551,0.000044241253,0.009352182,0.00013097616,0.000016872878,0.00014604996,0.007825596,0.0011686912,0.00040749123,0.8428231,0.09486784,0.04317254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016667962,0.00002771118,0.05937233,0.00029433946,0.000016057804,0.000045923378,0.0029823824,0.00036732465,0.00044746764,0.0082124,0.92816997,0.000047439833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9293786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9324151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92390203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.076097995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10088611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5521322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000049533","doi":"10.1007/s00199-003-0387-y","title":"Bilateral bargaining, unverifiable quality, and options to return","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Subgame perfect equilibrium; Microeconomics; Economics; Uniqueness; Negotiation; Bargaining problem; Markov perfect equilibrium; Mathematical economics; Quality (philosophy); Set (abstract data type); Verifiable secret sharing; Public finance; Ex-ante; Game theory; Nash equilibrium; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03965660945296697,"score_gpt":0.2482684732069473,"score_spread":0.20861186375398033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000049533","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2499579,0.008031835,0.37277293,0.04297115,0.00059715624,0.00016473065,0.00043498268,0.00013808475,0.3249312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98261005,0.0011827204,0.0051261447,0.0006213259,0.00028161626,0.00004827697,0.000046357072,0.000022910497,0.010060553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934361,0.0027609172,0.00028182685,0.0008246739,0.0014737506,0.0012227519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96879834,0.020497158,0.005283688,0.0019890273,0.0019237797,0.0015079486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014426629,0.00064458005,0.0017305425,0.001390793,0.0023036825,0.009438327,0.0019397413,0.004399094,0.01945023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054509837,0.00049277034,0.000931363,0.0021848965,0.009628949,0.01265962,0.0031404197,0.0064766454,0.00064239],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002585929,0.000015660135,0.00040228947,0.00001619726,0.000012173662,0.000018070554,0.00009031306,0.003284896,0.000032898806,0.99224997,0.00055556727,0.0032961082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000981525,0.0000041049407,0.00015326729,0.000009118245,0.000004555183,0.00000862069,0.00004866527,0.0024713783,0.000014691906,0.99681324,0.0004585436,0.000003867062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00566872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051093814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01945023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045239953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036645005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07629627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003502918","doi":"10.7202/043496ar","title":"No-Fault Automobile Insurance in Manitoba : An Overview","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Plan (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Jurisdiction; Compensation (psychology); Fault (geology); Law; Damages; Subject (documents); Political science; Business; Computer science; History; Psychology; Library science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.024269395606954295,"score_gpt":0.22028349575182968,"score_spread":0.1960141001448754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003502918","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18439084,0.560176,0.002964516,0.041861188,0.00078023225,0.00031598622,0.001997926,0.00009481269,0.2074185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37492895,0.5852829,0.0022380217,0.004775491,0.00062945375,0.00009891592,0.0009116261,0.000030962034,0.031103598],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925464,0.00011481994,0.00004270179,0.000054022556,0.00027860023,0.0002551749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984438,0.00037233633,0.00024175577,0.000034893383,0.00064940576,0.00025790738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007031648,0.00039803432,0.00034098103,0.008902477,0.0027893123,0.003880646,0.0019050954,0.001258631,0.004999672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001512085,0.0005469655,0.00040881967,0.01262609,0.001967075,0.0010759695,0.001303405,0.0011668141,0.00042719083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117964366,0.00086906593,0.190791,0.006339556,0.0002764645,0.00604894,0.007525627,0.009881609,0.0029249429,0.33055976,0.07894915,0.3657159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023622879,0.00017849222,0.4931566,0.0046228007,0.00013584307,0.0015666825,0.008295132,0.004618843,0.0007859105,0.011757266,0.47472084,0.00013791153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89762336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9580993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10237664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04742315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05697514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3440807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003716182","doi":"10.3917/anso.061.0201","title":"La courbe de gravité des crimes","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Année sociologique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0278393207393763,"score_gpt":0.23186757966297344,"score_spread":0.20402825892359713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003716182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7692593,0.009095581,0.01623046,0.01685074,0.0005386844,0.0001047664,0.003426525,0.00026897783,0.184225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814926,0.0018367504,0.0010077183,0.00013932587,0.00017092653,0.000033565884,0.0003357632,0.00003422778,0.014949112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958775,0.001696501,0.0002267297,0.00046139146,0.001373182,0.00036459236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779443,0.011213789,0.006441184,0.0008300602,0.0028135825,0.0007571138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025913084,0.0004943723,0.0004312729,0.0033706739,0.0011965722,0.0042531267,0.00052224996,0.0007933733,0.01711076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02362729,0.00023175534,0.0003618247,0.0030458649,0.0036115064,0.002230959,0.002022168,0.0019217583,0.0019880116],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005125026,0.00011653558,0.27207106,0.0004215452,0.00031092548,0.0011710555,0.024856515,0.013680175,0.00085719285,0.3986753,0.023927804,0.2633994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048875077,0.00038048142,0.5514819,0.0004870471,0.000072229515,0.0038921966,0.014624995,0.008529113,0.001343014,0.19515154,0.22378398,0.0002046051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012698885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006334259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01711076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036978826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009723828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0572412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005424013","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2282204","title":"Shotgun Mechanisms for Common-Value Partnerships: The Unassigned-Offeror Problem","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Business; Shotgun; Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.0342767611345692,"score_gpt":0.22659445356992625,"score_spread":0.19231769243535704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005424013","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12479159,0.0025614554,0.5823992,0.03284216,0.00052948244,0.0006568278,0.00066823023,0.0013187933,0.2542323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9300184,0.000894128,0.037050717,0.002152749,0.00036385166,0.0005860064,0.000108424785,0.00022524339,0.028600475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848897,0.007752576,0.00060420524,0.002286927,0.002769002,0.0016976816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92447513,0.05168528,0.003836418,0.015208149,0.0025574586,0.0022376159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020509217,0.0009998807,0.0036781193,0.0021378847,0.0059215967,0.010915555,0.00803127,0.014080107,0.043887496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.096652865,0.0014581388,0.0017051672,0.0029862486,0.011640463,0.03168699,0.00921427,0.011125753,0.0042380523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028195274,0.000025800846,0.000083342486,0.000030258921,0.000011210204,0.000033683526,0.00011568045,0.0004770511,0.00008518678,0.99320954,0.0018849492,0.004015237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003606613,0.000010466713,0.000030047942,0.000020402582,0.000008006693,0.0000378751,0.00005267747,0.0033229797,0.00009411899,0.9943973,0.001980065,0.000010058256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014107695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015974704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043887496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037212137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056078956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14681828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007449247","doi":"10.1515/1938-2545.1066","title":"Rational Reasonableness: Toward a Positive Theory of Public Reason","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Ethics of Human Rights","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public reason; Politics; Law and economics; Normative; Classical liberalism; Economic Justice; Political philosophy; Liberalism; Political science; Democracy; Ideal theory; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.0877160435449031,"score_gpt":0.2742288683457366,"score_spread":0.18651282480083353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007449247","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02439132,0.0020541204,0.5357595,0.0954291,0.0006312575,0.00015036581,0.00011878772,0.00020136642,0.34126428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92976123,0.0007664555,0.057351027,0.003636931,0.0007088115,0.00028130892,0.00007762105,0.00008476379,0.0073317923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806583,0.013596294,0.0005108535,0.0014780894,0.002957916,0.0007985889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9629488,0.02398175,0.002323982,0.0041403626,0.0053904466,0.0012146515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022513146,0.00069290906,0.0010271838,0.0037372536,0.003577893,0.010872565,0.0022295627,0.005312364,0.0057450826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025030727,0.0005791616,0.0015992267,0.0016627919,0.042255163,0.013887712,0.0059819515,0.007712196,0.0009179097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016638901,0.0000039045244,0.000024158913,0.0000060281563,0.0000014418746,0.0000058818805,0.00008370939,0.00023525691,0.0000107701735,0.99896336,0.00022258368,0.00044134198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035087232,0.0000020117645,0.000018036499,0.000011060085,0.000001714609,0.0000055679884,0.00005085403,0.0008016982,0.00001932483,0.99700683,0.0020774084,0.0000019339313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014534717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011758758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022513146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007326915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048061116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119062364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007838549","doi":"10.7202/1027102ar","title":"La rupture du contrat pour cause d’inexécution : regards sur le rôle de la bonne foi","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Obligation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01268923982153195,"score_gpt":0.19515804039402054,"score_spread":0.1824688005724886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007838549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06539654,0.0155813405,0.037102975,0.06629693,0.0016173066,0.00009823568,0.00012773526,0.00008061226,0.8136984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8757178,0.005072598,0.0056200745,0.008377113,0.00086119224,0.00012858844,0.000087382716,0.00019512259,0.10394026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98911554,0.004308572,0.0005211583,0.0017695309,0.0026041942,0.0016809276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99034566,0.004670514,0.0012453522,0.001110462,0.0018995148,0.00072838104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0079588285,0.0007288345,0.0006989048,0.0013494175,0.011357371,0.013838279,0.0033144366,0.012066647,0.016301598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014211092,0.00057234196,0.0012482497,0.0011475262,0.035990644,0.016653605,0.007634959,0.010258139,0.0018792062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012868465,0.00000763255,0.00039075146,0.000044795754,0.000005695086,0.00037972818,0.01700337,0.00010438992,0.00012258635,0.9773513,0.0018510817,0.0027257435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002332265,0.000070432274,0.0032705294,0.0014347116,0.00004560778,0.0018299125,0.05027218,0.0010542115,0.0010954702,0.46901026,0.47176993,0.00012343367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025039082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02435153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025039082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010716685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009480066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07775539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008771183","doi":"10.1177/0739456x0102100205","title":"Examining the Claims of Environmental ADR","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Planning Education and Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Panacea (medicine); Alternative dispute resolution; Test (biology); Empirical research; Mediation; Environmental planning; Business; Political science; Law; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.13376645111645602,"score_gpt":0.3337028828833602,"score_spread":0.19993643176690418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008771183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8401622,0.0024381722,0.0066423733,0.010602241,0.00010622953,0.00026393202,0.00017803133,0.000014037598,0.13959272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99686664,0.0005202506,0.0009735916,0.0005539111,0.00012835162,0.00008907079,0.00006496726,0.0000067717383,0.0007963949],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.85662496,0.06298679,0.013447669,0.0065319715,0.05273943,0.007669148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.18216334,0.67809635,0.08660746,0.018213477,0.03274631,0.0021730505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1411999,0.00043020325,0.0009913316,0.009805622,0.007001584,0.010578721,0.0025969627,0.0050084735,0.004843837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.50155014,0.0006969443,0.00087472564,0.008997725,0.022709586,0.013998748,0.00987088,0.004977667,0.0005801633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004994428,0.00070170773,0.48283383,0.00067764235,0.00037682522,0.0017846697,0.063705556,0.0032851142,0.0006528144,0.33462426,0.0035052712,0.107352845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003351464,0.001553139,0.5353057,0.001634492,0.0004965556,0.0031852329,0.1331701,0.016713893,0.0044236756,0.23633818,0.06652615,0.00031777128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008532084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072331643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1411999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060193064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004213717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74674535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008845298","doi":"10.7202/1013388ar","title":"Making Sense of the Shift in Paradigm on Cartel Enforcement: The Case for Applying a Desert Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Cartel; Mindset; Law and economics; Criminal law; Competition law; Competition (biology); Deterrence (psychology); Law enforcement; Political science; Enforcement; Law; Criminal justice; Criminology; Economics; Sociology; Incentive; Market economy","score_opus":0.05943427094717804,"score_gpt":0.25690755046902214,"score_spread":0.1974732795218441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008845298","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028933179,0.009980233,0.08838032,0.64175737,0.0016745239,0.00006711897,0.00007053462,0.00008926877,0.22904743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8481635,0.004721735,0.024084534,0.10199386,0.0033598305,0.00017880942,0.00004202767,0.00013875912,0.017317025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828802,0.008962771,0.00045857992,0.0019610415,0.003973596,0.0017637704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97406685,0.017027812,0.0020946155,0.0024718053,0.0030122218,0.001326677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021854928,0.0005579125,0.0010420439,0.0023023568,0.007564741,0.0132984985,0.0040373644,0.014397587,0.003033973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02789014,0.0004369798,0.0010130014,0.0017431695,0.052358814,0.01340774,0.005517162,0.016486822,0.0005098782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027689973,0.000005021266,0.000060171722,0.000007284137,0.0000017325794,0.000019977702,0.00035108166,0.00013653544,0.000012766088,0.9966492,0.001517344,0.0012362112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010479276,0.00000947938,0.00013325625,0.00005871845,0.000002778687,0.000035373596,0.00043571022,0.00074368546,0.000048405986,0.9706998,0.027811587,0.000010694812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008219071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008438342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021854928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008625255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009542137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115581274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010166387","doi":"10.1108/03068290610689723","title":"Human agency and free will: choice and determinism in economics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Free will; Determinism; Free market; Economics; Freedom of choice; Action (physics); Coercion (linguistics); Positive economics; Value (mathematics); Agency (philosophy); Libertarianism; Public choice; Public economics; Neoclassical economics; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.019379690457956355,"score_gpt":0.23607439890178833,"score_spread":0.21669470844383198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010166387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082896635,0.05010293,0.20378156,0.14918618,0.0013547419,0.0002324846,0.00020452196,0.000113041395,0.5121278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721867,0.006496265,0.010926544,0.0029992068,0.00057010713,0.0001417867,0.00003571961,0.00002868058,0.0066149607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98795575,0.008610386,0.00028913695,0.0009788986,0.001576909,0.0005889001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808075,0.014334196,0.0013831501,0.0017918753,0.0010640628,0.00061914424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010478075,0.00042020174,0.0008604307,0.0015016785,0.003082483,0.006729339,0.0012834301,0.003342122,0.0037271173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014429342,0.00035379475,0.0008335845,0.0016538919,0.052929316,0.007987322,0.004094497,0.0045533637,0.00043346535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005627779,0.0000070858896,0.00016402954,0.000031041083,0.000004667333,0.000019269824,0.0005056734,0.00040330566,0.000020575804,0.99615234,0.0004504521,0.002235878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031269985,0.0000055173414,0.00021025195,0.000066566216,0.0000029157286,0.000024527939,0.00026030975,0.00046541478,0.000027155518,0.99291575,0.0060125645,0.0000058576125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031523919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016001916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010478075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053212806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039041818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05541402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010305357","doi":"10.7202/043445ar","title":"L'impartialité des juges et la lecture morale des droits","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.014405888995744473,"score_gpt":0.22162853642481573,"score_spread":0.20722264742907126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010305357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052236695,0.007765057,0.025832316,0.09688011,0.0012060235,0.000058934776,0.000054507113,0.0001103778,0.8158559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9199493,0.0030036059,0.002305642,0.007389903,0.0005798291,0.00011118367,0.000016583997,0.0000863451,0.06655772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783266,0.011318996,0.00055396266,0.0021216448,0.0052419854,0.0024367617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721584,0.016302953,0.0033010442,0.0032058773,0.0030292892,0.0020024662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013646639,0.00059779844,0.0006294723,0.001276113,0.008631177,0.018493978,0.002042551,0.006176978,0.012966015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03291569,0.000516805,0.0006200738,0.0012408686,0.03749548,0.008589951,0.009098776,0.012526976,0.0020925466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016735896,0.000011455233,0.00029554454,0.000033393477,0.000005664157,0.000031419935,0.0038486547,0.00011183114,0.0000861011,0.9878727,0.0020479131,0.0056385603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007654193,0.00009250857,0.0032910104,0.0005076529,0.000035754594,0.00018078373,0.0059767687,0.00092994823,0.0011932672,0.7403038,0.24734458,0.00006735516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017610172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018050766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018493978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01097411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011189606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0796231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014083047","doi":"10.1111/1468-232x.00301","title":"Do Public‐Sector Strike Bans Really Prevent Conflict?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Arbitration; Dispute resolution; Publicity; Government (linguistics); Dispute mechanism; Business; Alternative dispute resolution; Labor disputes; Compulsory arbitration; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Labor relations","score_opus":0.08655875820973472,"score_gpt":0.23795156974602386,"score_spread":0.15139281153628914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014083047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74667853,0.009984137,0.008455615,0.077762835,0.0012365684,0.00017116759,0.00022805059,0.00026426406,0.15521885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946837,0.0007991947,0.00043497642,0.0020490594,0.00023390507,0.000032333937,0.000033732525,0.0000112109865,0.0017218473],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536043,0.001842823,0.00014864637,0.00027993787,0.0012878787,0.0010802427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791424,0.011902498,0.005741062,0.0011310078,0.0011327306,0.00095035264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060617523,0.00023476731,0.00052241277,0.00080548547,0.0011731777,0.002426517,0.0008295627,0.0024730384,0.016527092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03846718,0.00026952874,0.00034776694,0.00081426813,0.0029591604,0.0028970372,0.0010623701,0.0018398041,0.0015091872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027782847,0.008336217,0.09757872,0.0018486779,0.00074466236,0.0004314883,0.0023521804,0.011771023,0.004489418,0.20247887,0.040007792,0.62718266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004116157,0.0076053306,0.4094702,0.0014190032,0.0011107292,0.0011600304,0.0107988585,0.016893707,0.0146512,0.33932012,0.19330014,0.00015454597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022600666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004325466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016527092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014168081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002767018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055288613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W201479641","doi":"10.29173/alr122","title":"Force Majeure in Canadian Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Force majeure; Causation; Law; Jurisprudence; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.04278932378841648,"score_gpt":0.21615882636705544,"score_spread":0.17336950257863895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W201479641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031084526,0.05095559,0.0056233793,0.105104126,0.0013031956,0.00016767524,0.001040303,0.00015878063,0.80456233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7157375,0.04835162,0.00931446,0.030503701,0.00079417357,0.00008575295,0.0006861806,0.00010832004,0.19441816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99287754,0.00056027825,0.00020920203,0.0007059754,0.0041391165,0.0015078728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991876,0.0020963505,0.00042793556,0.00031540694,0.004689854,0.0005943791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045784954,0.00044365154,0.00047134937,0.0046791346,0.012975686,0.010267647,0.0023837597,0.0038253248,0.00920292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015089754,0.00052261475,0.0005411253,0.006427052,0.01188404,0.0022164446,0.0016740966,0.003759612,0.000506643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008080101,0.000008250271,0.0014215419,0.00008640493,0.0000071745317,0.00014302734,0.0014602569,0.00063133537,0.00011204195,0.9244719,0.05116778,0.020482184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021435908,0.000015937001,0.014417909,0.0005703525,0.000041865773,0.00014590088,0.0019700564,0.0015460408,0.0002448334,0.079815984,0.90109754,0.000112042035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99284536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99475795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15159023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15159023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21998721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9840351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015481015","doi":"10.5558/tfc80567-5","title":"Professional forestry, due diligence, and the advice of specialists","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Forester; Due diligence; Diligence; Liability; Business; Forestry; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Political science; Accounting; Finance; Psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.01874008371046731,"score_gpt":0.22802799667359946,"score_spread":0.20928791296313215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015481015","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072994575,0.007949466,0.012242571,0.4764745,0.0007696848,0.00016458455,0.00005873515,0.00005320705,0.42929265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92363775,0.0020924236,0.002731864,0.03592516,0.0004403412,0.0000834991,0.000023915685,0.000018798526,0.03504633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9726897,0.013628877,0.0009656332,0.0016494023,0.0057093087,0.005357106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96027434,0.024666151,0.004169245,0.0016071531,0.0051479144,0.004135247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02017632,0.00026403437,0.0004753495,0.0010711526,0.009889805,0.007288912,0.0012005789,0.013749968,0.0044039935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0713188,0.00025341814,0.00034055286,0.0009469431,0.028560545,0.0044957176,0.0034919211,0.0077970484,0.00059463154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001741686,0.00003321263,0.002446707,0.000047486094,0.0000074626605,0.00054207427,0.007654077,0.0006688463,0.00012064334,0.9515866,0.023153542,0.013721872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086717366,0.00008745503,0.01211049,0.0006340238,0.000021409345,0.0007330961,0.006939964,0.002554351,0.00028824472,0.76239794,0.21402402,0.0001222722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2801152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3373456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2801152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019687619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04084116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55696946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016055494","doi":"10.7202/1027101ar","title":"La révision du contrat en droit québécois","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009502979009131135,"score_gpt":0.18909519160479926,"score_spread":0.17959221259566813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016055494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17924517,0.014188405,0.020603267,0.032402545,0.0015603518,0.00011277305,0.00081987237,0.00015791497,0.7509097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79975784,0.0024978595,0.003872188,0.00301518,0.00025066867,0.000032049164,0.00015026666,0.0001131801,0.1903108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955924,0.00083019765,0.0001521635,0.0008378264,0.0020480037,0.0005393193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943039,0.0013514832,0.00041822722,0.00070476404,0.0030140702,0.00020754673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038664057,0.0005049249,0.0005248634,0.0019861488,0.006718803,0.009553883,0.0017148342,0.0038701245,0.0122911325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008949003,0.00041449585,0.0006272245,0.0018768858,0.01064704,0.0033387125,0.0018850241,0.0044146567,0.0007010551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014179687,0.0000076171914,0.0012286393,0.000038798935,0.000015028484,0.0002484457,0.0032175158,0.00053455745,0.000317214,0.97178787,0.0087367315,0.013853325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030063327,0.00005228951,0.011790762,0.0006780273,0.00008806944,0.00058044074,0.00564811,0.004278216,0.001900736,0.1646165,0.81017566,0.00016120487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74745905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7845274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25254095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035454437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021097127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5080564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016444857","doi":"10.1111/j.1465-7287.2007.00065.x","title":"CRIMINAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES AND JUDICIAL DISCRETION","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Economic Policy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Sentencing guidelines; Judicial discretion; Legislature; Punishment (psychology); Context (archaeology); Ex-ante; Political science; Criminal law; Set (abstract data type); Law; Law and economics; Economics; Criminology; Judicial review; Psychology; Social psychology; Sentence; Macroeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.12348154184183346,"score_gpt":0.27786410570394765,"score_spread":0.15438256386211419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016444857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7638051,0.0038169147,0.031655535,0.021663068,0.00012298762,0.00008606449,0.0005664809,0.00016516684,0.17811865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706453,0.00024767147,0.0010115752,0.00024011417,0.00005754178,0.000019165846,0.000051463718,0.000012680628,0.0012951774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861377,0.0064637302,0.00089229,0.001215867,0.0031392945,0.0021512015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93879086,0.034665618,0.017635584,0.0023886801,0.004761931,0.0017572949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063309586,0.00020101585,0.00055646664,0.002147413,0.0016656877,0.004475693,0.0010958816,0.00215045,0.004708469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060246453,0.00049281423,0.00026887143,0.0022844633,0.0047588507,0.0030084192,0.0018718231,0.0027240848,0.00057153817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009326902,0.00012960265,0.0200506,0.00006503793,0.00005008746,0.00019379074,0.0013559613,0.019907756,0.00051877904,0.9262604,0.0036312419,0.02774341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016136898,0.00014544255,0.087649055,0.00022547905,0.00007483743,0.0002096083,0.0019447735,0.023086676,0.0005998073,0.86197853,0.023810942,0.00011346364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010843271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015353277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010843271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047003548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049290266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034103572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017298995","doi":"10.1016/j.irle.2009.04.001","title":"Excessive spending by firms to avoid accidents: Is it a concern in practice?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Law and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.04331782204800293,"score_gpt":0.31042026376791526,"score_spread":0.2671024417199123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017298995","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27832428,0.034953736,0.0134946,0.5248095,0.0020679783,0.00009806525,0.0011481391,0.00025489845,0.14484885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9453245,0.010535847,0.0021749695,0.03358911,0.0017233597,0.000058657963,0.00020944174,0.000046887584,0.006337254],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98739886,0.0048418567,0.0008074984,0.0010145337,0.0036762715,0.0022609942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86828846,0.047666702,0.041819748,0.008602943,0.02196262,0.0116594415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009888941,0.00040985981,0.00064670725,0.0026846475,0.0015870264,0.004217075,0.0016138846,0.0068438617,0.0070289276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074234284,0.0004167177,0.0005151839,0.0026231783,0.0052097654,0.0027980597,0.001907841,0.0037071593,0.00080031494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043884869,0.000772982,0.23800246,0.0013035238,0.0011128553,0.000741091,0.0052273804,0.0042792857,0.0015185165,0.24286051,0.21211539,0.29162723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019279325,0.000904852,0.3544424,0.0043292088,0.00062208733,0.002595569,0.0144984,0.004275739,0.0023959873,0.2919309,0.32355428,0.0002578024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027475653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048368674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027475653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004172037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009520547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05463147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017931849","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.301311","title":"Allocation of Decision-Making Authority","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.021380669011300056,"score_gpt":0.228007152195631,"score_spread":0.20662648318433094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017931849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20380607,0.0009980325,0.29147846,0.010481659,0.0002807762,0.0004869525,0.00031825821,0.00027476603,0.49187502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97598743,0.00014367496,0.009870522,0.00021025086,0.00010839118,0.00013365567,0.00003311916,0.000018989791,0.013493933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908736,0.00445939,0.00041597965,0.0012361733,0.0017338198,0.0012810711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851863,0.007899225,0.0010504874,0.002622631,0.0019052261,0.0013360397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008039041,0.00053311605,0.00079543126,0.001969459,0.0014618002,0.0067032194,0.0013143314,0.0022746203,0.02023032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032099787,0.00038436425,0.0005506187,0.0011956852,0.003317147,0.0043715667,0.002260646,0.0019453058,0.0018818483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007838888,0.000049708207,0.00086447084,0.000029111132,0.000027009086,0.00004339747,0.00038403392,0.002969378,0.0005440588,0.9801342,0.0012555458,0.013620719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064418884,0.00003915962,0.0012781279,0.000022410833,0.000019699033,0.0000470769,0.00021959005,0.018584542,0.00036216437,0.97420496,0.005143193,0.00001472335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008551388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010722409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02023032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030797953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035666605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0676772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20182015","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00644.x","title":"Bank Monitoring and Environmental Risk","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Finance &amp Accounting","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Loan; Business; Liability; Debt; Financial system; Monetary economics; Finance; Economics","score_opus":0.013905429451983415,"score_gpt":0.18441940074995766,"score_spread":0.17051397129797424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20182015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942047,0.0002652542,0.00012377407,0.000468777,0.0000056524777,0.00002067267,0.00055410014,0.000015574,0.004341414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864465,0.00011116698,0.000038162918,0.000025713436,0.000005157756,0.0000028366073,0.0002028907,0.0000015877092,0.0009678432],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991615,0.00013525563,0.000045834542,0.0000714473,0.00036219574,0.00022377814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860094,0.003201195,0.00750063,0.0003620631,0.0020452936,0.0008813312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012209249,0.00015978771,0.00021479045,0.00067839865,0.00068513607,0.0010297504,0.0002791718,0.00051259174,0.0054761055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010575547,0.00013552517,0.00016415838,0.0011925498,0.00043111524,0.00030057222,0.0003683657,0.000519437,0.00042894727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044755955,0.00009144379,0.98003334,0.000033389708,0.00005079295,0.00016656781,0.0003875722,0.0020688649,0.00072689884,0.00050524523,0.002239161,0.013249212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001569732,0.000051958912,0.99525887,0.000009001772,0.000032429492,0.000051640676,0.00028014035,0.0018917209,0.00047822008,0.0001711779,0.0017486076,0.000010589033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47217223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57718164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47217223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045660813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040291334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9388478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018438127","doi":"10.7202/043612ar","title":"La règle de la bonne foi prévue dans l'article 1375 du Code civil du Québec : sa portée et les sanctions qui en découlent","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Obligation; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.007531405798254452,"score_gpt":0.1988167190642522,"score_spread":0.19128531326599774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018438127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11019992,0.01080815,0.015237741,0.043363992,0.0010839142,0.00016355998,0.0013290822,0.00016063279,0.81765306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7009363,0.0024938628,0.0039107553,0.005356629,0.00012657381,0.000089902125,0.0002523109,0.000074034535,0.28675967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965724,0.00047420154,0.00009296714,0.00040872997,0.0015860142,0.0008657176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688894,0.0005615069,0.00019723701,0.00013563699,0.0018986152,0.00031811607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018670417,0.00041427996,0.00025004178,0.0012680171,0.009541042,0.0062691686,0.0009310955,0.0027745254,0.013548429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00518765,0.00032354565,0.00040319088,0.0017876014,0.0070442036,0.0019525551,0.0013579936,0.0034847418,0.0009030887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003061795,0.00001909499,0.0066386466,0.0001439943,0.000016571861,0.0002679705,0.019229447,0.0008100819,0.0011905701,0.8709443,0.063825496,0.036883287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001509081,0.000036713518,0.046553563,0.0005062524,0.000039473816,0.00015447213,0.010984249,0.0010464739,0.0013126894,0.025837045,0.91339314,0.00012093821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96241045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98306537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053465944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053465944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06800559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38792443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019500305","doi":"10.1002/ert.20122","title":"As retaliation rises, Supreme Court expands standards","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Employment Relations Today","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.0199232970851525,"score_gpt":0.23616608286940033,"score_spread":0.21624278578424783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019500305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26271543,0.0020991955,0.01826198,0.060821142,0.0009749531,0.00016325204,0.0006419664,0.0006623118,0.6536597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.948267,0.0004177012,0.0035266017,0.0125199165,0.00076166645,0.00007467788,0.00022742423,0.00009787227,0.03410708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.980803,0.0030978043,0.0011168486,0.0024747644,0.009477798,0.0030297716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95265585,0.019190064,0.005809528,0.006053066,0.013010417,0.0032810813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011672567,0.00031439957,0.00076084316,0.0027970925,0.0048014224,0.008767013,0.0023999994,0.0074556842,0.01538281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05686439,0.0004570067,0.00064570707,0.001458889,0.0039610188,0.0053934236,0.0034081677,0.0086206235,0.0037315006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000600907,0.000275053,0.011881905,0.000049606355,0.000031507247,0.00021084298,0.002739476,0.0020478445,0.0040188376,0.9012241,0.034594756,0.04286592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110686735,0.00033113032,0.047353134,0.00020781609,0.00004977099,0.00033033232,0.004332736,0.004810432,0.005211799,0.72522056,0.21186031,0.00018131039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0103723155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018099438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01538281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048879515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077434517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06173122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019761438","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.373501","title":"Comparative Mixed Risk Aversion: Definition and Application to Self-Protection and Willingness to Pay","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Statistics Canada; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Risk aversion (psychology); Actuarial science; Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Financial economics; Expected utility hypothesis","score_opus":0.017843919959716997,"score_gpt":0.20466823262209685,"score_spread":0.18682431266237987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019761438","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3460227,0.006243655,0.5909844,0.007752149,0.00024101709,0.00018927953,0.00026945747,0.0001075317,0.048189763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759837,0.0011372734,0.020204775,0.00029943493,0.00024535612,0.00012849436,0.000047135563,0.000013024174,0.0019407212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740183,0.0015724713,0.00014798982,0.00038829655,0.00029920836,0.0001902666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808406,0.014449286,0.0021783186,0.0012419476,0.0006625031,0.0006272926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007930713,0.0008382717,0.0012413753,0.0018596179,0.00065832183,0.0035720803,0.0015511365,0.0029710636,0.00469389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022699073,0.00047978957,0.0015400142,0.0019189059,0.0047521293,0.0046468475,0.0032397013,0.0031943896,0.00016544519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044081964,0.00005700415,0.0041414765,0.00007791966,0.0000978378,0.00010297096,0.00077297713,0.0043669087,0.00036621533,0.9792183,0.00045603732,0.010298266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020793108,0.000055517015,0.0032231896,0.00004177321,0.00004286281,0.00021940116,0.00035591886,0.012072976,0.00013691971,0.98260224,0.0012009856,0.00002735544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007419077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054961065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007930713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001332178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008230057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04194212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021474072","doi":"10.1142/s0217590810003729","title":"USING ECONOMIC ANALYSIS TO PROVIDE LEGAL ADVICE: AN EXAMPLE INVOLVING BUSINESS INCOME TRUSTS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Singapore Economic Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Economic analysis; Debt; Legal doctrine; Business; Liability; Limited liability; Doctrine; Legal advice; Economics; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Accounting; Public economics; Finance; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06338564604840814,"score_gpt":0.27819548223590523,"score_spread":0.2148098361874971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021474072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2367329,0.009567335,0.07766458,0.11492268,0.00056135084,0.0005841791,0.0004652643,0.00018759997,0.55931413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9266051,0.0067169885,0.029049307,0.0029264083,0.00024788675,0.00017225178,0.00013496404,0.00006614636,0.03408098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923794,0.0047352077,0.00036442679,0.00022392058,0.0014319108,0.0008650614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778282,0.017981436,0.00095127407,0.0004360077,0.002379905,0.0004231741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009547159,0.00039514946,0.00067462376,0.0032960658,0.005892281,0.0045622834,0.0011023696,0.005846753,0.0070575075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028888129,0.00039513217,0.00110758,0.003979245,0.0040035737,0.0060181823,0.0034050243,0.0050855014,0.00060580135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004280541,0.00013923965,0.0035049005,0.0001419882,0.000035315865,0.0049378965,0.0050295815,0.006344107,0.00015297269,0.93930334,0.018563658,0.021804158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016413415,0.0001682545,0.009225502,0.00071427494,0.00014387454,0.0016264173,0.014985581,0.063745566,0.00089277053,0.62995285,0.278169,0.0002116992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048051316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05589998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048051316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008583858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048431475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095543265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027266183","doi":"10.3917/redp.126.0845","title":"Assurance de responsabilité et aléa moral dans les régimes de responsabilité objective et pour faute","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d économie politique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.053138336842128556,"score_gpt":0.2517294118842692,"score_spread":0.19859107504214069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027266183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.435513,0.0024957361,0.08302489,0.025880333,0.00024418326,0.00025258644,0.0004066681,0.00016524614,0.45201734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869153,0.00026153077,0.003554245,0.00046982567,0.000085656975,0.00011279462,0.000034292974,0.000015247776,0.00855108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891879,0.004981822,0.00054935407,0.0012966135,0.0024196177,0.0015646336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97086126,0.014095546,0.0066699586,0.0037155575,0.0032383632,0.0014193567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0104422225,0.0005576892,0.00073399843,0.0015133057,0.0025238143,0.005964189,0.00088782865,0.0028988034,0.010587019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028653068,0.00047480586,0.00090468855,0.00067951996,0.00897027,0.0040170336,0.0035275393,0.0039907373,0.00091615616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077261204,0.000065088134,0.006391773,0.00008334511,0.00005201849,0.00010401402,0.0023803383,0.0036231426,0.0007298941,0.97359335,0.0008743686,0.012025443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008438332,0.00030787964,0.025652235,0.0003651412,0.00008268753,0.0002986976,0.0034150064,0.0081706755,0.001404379,0.90670687,0.05339585,0.000116295385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064251944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044712424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010587019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061214203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048366413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05522442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030243355","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2000.tb00416.x","title":"Option Contracts as a Solution to the Holdup Problem in Agri‐food Markets","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Commodity; Investment (military); Simple (philosophy); Work (physics); Asset (computer security); Microeconomics; Economics; Business; Finance; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.021252872581261226,"score_gpt":0.15802019381345642,"score_spread":0.1367673212321952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030243355","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068897285,0.0030364846,0.7953706,0.0128558995,0.00035316017,0.00027751812,0.00029393562,0.00022123457,0.11869388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85244626,0.002462565,0.101412766,0.0008823793,0.00070973625,0.0004467559,0.0001445298,0.00009779235,0.041397206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574137,0.0022078056,0.00020131585,0.00042176773,0.00096156064,0.00046612715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98942214,0.0073062177,0.0012168427,0.0009105052,0.0006221147,0.00052221183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008088082,0.00067961554,0.0012727549,0.0009697732,0.0024546564,0.0050392994,0.0024154051,0.00723981,0.012691361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020326983,0.00083775586,0.0014476714,0.0013018771,0.0059707626,0.00892941,0.0031969748,0.00756211,0.0007125699],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009044785,0.000011928234,0.00005916113,0.000014734686,0.0000053932745,0.000084550025,0.0000734715,0.008076611,0.000085309344,0.9887899,0.0005492417,0.0022406883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026232281,0.000011838721,0.000046071764,0.000015608613,0.000004231952,0.00004686276,0.000038480637,0.0256602,0.00006238636,0.9708877,0.0031896613,0.000010732053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025890109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016165074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012691361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021958975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003767201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04277438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031531909","doi":"10.3917/riges.332.0053","title":"Aspects juridiques et pratiques de la gestion de l'accommodement","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Gestion","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026962031469453664,"score_gpt":0.2401779473261781,"score_spread":0.21321591585672442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031531909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13014466,0.0075227646,0.007884075,0.090097055,0.00046209173,0.00009956363,0.00012461025,0.000054166605,0.7636111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88568765,0.002041753,0.0009861141,0.0049982467,0.00022937871,0.000050303024,0.000026467616,0.000023261755,0.10595681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941731,0.0019814176,0.0001968468,0.00047407584,0.0017126136,0.0014618811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995742,0.0017754124,0.00055746804,0.00024692932,0.0011257614,0.0005524147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004609966,0.00019093766,0.00021771126,0.0008847707,0.012218061,0.0075693317,0.0012172341,0.003582518,0.0077213864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008960818,0.0002590839,0.00016799824,0.001172378,0.018264048,0.0023419422,0.0036603452,0.0045268824,0.0007591918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011340558,0.000012010994,0.0014310689,0.000031997533,0.0000030783544,0.00029692604,0.018239079,0.00021170138,0.00028605087,0.9621539,0.0074495655,0.009873156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023310875,0.000049156446,0.016223444,0.00060794776,0.000016823049,0.00052947365,0.043076623,0.0006813937,0.0008226501,0.2176294,0.72025317,0.000086559696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28142416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39509657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28142416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017724365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029261421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5595722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032902571","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2014.18.2.447","title":"Judging, Fast and Slow: Using Decision-Making Theory to Explore Judicial Fact Determination","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.118251817099726,"score_gpt":0.32528523306925483,"score_spread":0.20703341596952884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032902571","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27716783,0.00763862,0.5609025,0.023383642,0.0005153345,0.00046910645,0.00018805703,0.00011107838,0.12962388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9244527,0.0010781236,0.071948566,0.000694424,0.00015242402,0.00021776359,0.000059131733,0.000031716532,0.0013650549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9735444,0.020420546,0.0008132789,0.0018844394,0.0022972918,0.0010399933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87845117,0.107028924,0.0059984736,0.0042562205,0.0030595246,0.0012057491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031502232,0.00080977014,0.001078639,0.004427005,0.0027123063,0.0103461975,0.002655579,0.0033504982,0.004159081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10522743,0.000732259,0.0015654488,0.0029515575,0.025292665,0.015021718,0.003882149,0.0049454486,0.00035510497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011276063,0.00009359549,0.004991717,0.0001697427,0.0001071276,0.000228237,0.011225907,0.011649048,0.00025932657,0.94373864,0.00073311967,0.026690634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003199156,0.000036303154,0.0014997477,0.000085344196,0.000022048143,0.00005016232,0.0016655999,0.020604799,0.00017323728,0.9732386,0.0025608998,0.00003133616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042415205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031209947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031502232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052741165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003654934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16660172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W203363839","doi":"","title":"Confusion About Causation in Insurance: Solutions for Catastrophic Losses","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Context (archaeology); Tort; Actuarial science; Damages; Business; Law and economics; Insurance policy; Economics; Political science; Law; Liability","score_opus":0.021782213195452874,"score_gpt":0.2278605222714237,"score_spread":0.20607830907597083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W203363839","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021757083,0.018919377,0.29671726,0.5618795,0.003187804,0.00018119552,0.000066960114,0.00027654882,0.0970143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84621465,0.022063965,0.0854081,0.02450591,0.004081917,0.00043517348,0.00008922229,0.00016281263,0.017038295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859285,0.0068015717,0.0009183103,0.0016457011,0.0036141276,0.0010918353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761178,0.01557145,0.0022821655,0.0023470048,0.0027821616,0.0008994115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024633473,0.0012235618,0.0010319208,0.0035784864,0.0072665946,0.012386835,0.0045356685,0.014700083,0.0047706016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040325947,0.000814919,0.0016673307,0.0016044161,0.044915494,0.024255928,0.012513681,0.015896788,0.00063879037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006650117,0.000009987179,0.00015195966,0.000029522733,0.0000050836147,0.00008805342,0.0007783121,0.0008743678,0.000032214695,0.9898811,0.0015607923,0.006581906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008194758,0.0000071419668,0.00007875875,0.00012984242,0.0000052397604,0.000077372904,0.00083513866,0.001372833,0.00005874376,0.98427236,0.013140956,0.000013355847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052018957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038605076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024633473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009718553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011479451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13027579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033759486","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.4.0211","title":"Getting to Grips with the Shareholder Value Theory in Corporate Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder value; Shareholder; Shareholder primacy; Corporate law; Value (mathematics); Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Stakeholder theory; Law and economics; Shareholder resolution; Business; Accounting; Shareholder loan; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.04901545279999093,"score_gpt":0.2369588806333884,"score_spread":0.1879434278333975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033759486","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021732425,0.079856634,0.10949601,0.5761514,0.0041231476,0.00006852871,0.00008933968,0.00011233859,0.20837025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.772853,0.06538343,0.045729056,0.06663253,0.01725098,0.00028887347,0.00014076261,0.00027092907,0.031450395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98597175,0.008163187,0.00038700693,0.0010472791,0.0036053904,0.00082532776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96904254,0.0260952,0.000983451,0.001221593,0.0018435821,0.00081370433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018697063,0.0008813168,0.0015179927,0.0036239745,0.0056149806,0.014571907,0.0024675168,0.010657401,0.0050818496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0233022,0.00067276176,0.0011617966,0.0033892002,0.0817236,0.04229656,0.006044685,0.023856254,0.0015408017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029934238,0.000010160518,0.000081350496,0.000027780028,0.0000023611963,0.00002726122,0.0008285541,0.00012543594,0.000026282898,0.9935196,0.0017878967,0.0035602227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041998064,0.000007969413,0.00008130686,0.00011072431,0.0000013879002,0.000016446496,0.00040560352,0.00026561657,0.000038319675,0.98635536,0.012705858,0.000007203014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058652605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042054136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018697063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009537829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060473443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09888071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036115085","doi":"10.7202/044137ar","title":"La règle sur les clauses abusives sous l’éclairage du droit comparé","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Council on International Law","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01313757391058002,"score_gpt":0.19194858433782536,"score_spread":0.17881101042724534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036115085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68119454,0.009998815,0.015728315,0.009100784,0.0002921008,0.00013927782,0.00037575976,0.000042348915,0.28312793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592474,0.0019293453,0.002426361,0.0011706133,0.00008304547,0.00004221712,0.00016620319,0.000039115454,0.03489574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912034,0.0027034103,0.00038604657,0.0009834161,0.0035658553,0.0011578315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97315234,0.012826445,0.0046318364,0.0014711975,0.0073767467,0.0005414195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060859183,0.0003835959,0.000464165,0.003541403,0.0062543806,0.0074299127,0.0012202674,0.0020969072,0.013122753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02459867,0.00040303523,0.0003764521,0.0049120695,0.011527134,0.004685535,0.0029008165,0.0040084044,0.00085872057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017366167,0.00006452206,0.06637138,0.00047728705,0.00010051552,0.0018920993,0.23847918,0.0006542513,0.0038528577,0.6008162,0.0061976216,0.08092044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043838667,0.00011092733,0.26472035,0.0017995953,0.00021998872,0.0033457996,0.19843203,0.002035815,0.0062232967,0.070269875,0.4525089,0.0002896251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34660405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47985092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34660405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012683406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075070234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6891732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036309617","doi":"10.7202/1023208ar","title":"Démission et congédiement : la difficile parité des règles de droit applicables à ces deux actes","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017908295550959213,"score_gpt":0.21569452246424073,"score_spread":0.19778622691328152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036309617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13517074,0.00382639,0.014091217,0.047410097,0.001398986,0.0006195876,0.001993841,0.0006147501,0.79487437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40798846,0.0014030288,0.006261036,0.011132728,0.00019759627,0.00035822453,0.0008346861,0.00023155373,0.5715927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836564,0.0023195962,0.00065023487,0.0016046473,0.008206423,0.003562747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861779,0.0022422955,0.0009997623,0.0016742707,0.0073817577,0.0015239773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008848542,0.00044025193,0.00039911547,0.001758099,0.008247198,0.007744657,0.001885498,0.003500796,0.019073762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017906398,0.00049489515,0.00069455197,0.0016697932,0.0070868763,0.0028280227,0.004412306,0.0052291243,0.004558554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002204958,0.00018959625,0.039370134,0.00043569703,0.00007530737,0.001141247,0.038694955,0.0019179045,0.004944136,0.4958184,0.24320294,0.17398922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019841247,0.0000819175,0.065706745,0.00044136273,0.000026757485,0.0002926908,0.01126289,0.00053745334,0.0016961604,0.010041525,0.9097533,0.00013931368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7255514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8002668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7255514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025130702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062955685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5521297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036620672","doi":"10.1111/1468-2311.00240","title":"Do Bail Information Schemes Really Affect Bail Decisions?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Social psychology; Actuarial science; Business","score_opus":0.07081948863271353,"score_gpt":0.25333449400705915,"score_spread":0.18251500537434562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036620672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9681531,0.0005139917,0.001762082,0.004033071,0.00008143263,0.00015899306,0.00016686389,0.00003465163,0.025095873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973628,0.00017214466,0.00073418446,0.0004852182,0.000036114532,0.00003892156,0.000042480217,0.0000075379817,0.0011206416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99276537,0.004891166,0.0003008824,0.00055865734,0.0010641806,0.00041980296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86757827,0.099359654,0.022662453,0.0052853255,0.002341544,0.0027728088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010009398,0.00030511466,0.0006782962,0.0006073939,0.00061409024,0.0026466765,0.00069322315,0.0028059753,0.011661362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11311082,0.00038047403,0.00037534503,0.0005562368,0.001824948,0.0030896007,0.0008618454,0.0014196965,0.0011371932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011640997,0.012644059,0.63836306,0.0010507561,0.0008929761,0.00061781134,0.0052211713,0.0082653295,0.021838665,0.050654463,0.009445764,0.23936498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014583314,0.008484007,0.90742946,0.00016463341,0.00051375205,0.00029848667,0.0026220141,0.014844321,0.0071186814,0.0454089,0.01149081,0.00016671247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013919313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016948204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011661362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013490841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074700115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05293536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037288377","doi":"10.7202/043504ar","title":"Compensation for Non-Economic Loss, the Tort-Liability Insurance System, and the 21st Century","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Damages; Liability insurance; Tort reform; Compensation (psychology); Liability; Law; Pain and suffering; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Actuarial science; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.009418103529852548,"score_gpt":0.1896499117454836,"score_spread":0.18023180821563106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037288377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11131677,0.1833764,0.07853708,0.16619101,0.0022013006,0.0000900876,0.00036246335,0.00015924913,0.4577656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9141077,0.041863378,0.0073353616,0.005455196,0.0023886797,0.000046049503,0.00009012556,0.000024037023,0.028689526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970937,0.0016017768,0.00008592876,0.0003065505,0.00065692543,0.00025508826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962896,0.002282262,0.0007977026,0.00015632274,0.0003131481,0.00016082586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023929998,0.0002816713,0.00024632935,0.0017332392,0.0016827951,0.0048250714,0.0005672746,0.0025974875,0.004694086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060666613,0.00020706926,0.00024756332,0.0016115468,0.009141319,0.0044664843,0.0014051682,0.0021300185,0.00032524788],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033685312,0.00000801946,0.0010153824,0.000015731874,0.0000023667283,0.00003466904,0.00011348228,0.0006681234,0.000019911336,0.9888875,0.0018395004,0.007391902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010854052,0.000050123814,0.008893199,0.000313992,0.000010560417,0.00025386873,0.00091293914,0.0034944043,0.00012161302,0.8204646,0.16543396,0.000039940816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01053935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011785893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01053935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053290226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002287528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038664997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038347096","doi":"10.7202/017031ar","title":"Criminal Law and its Influence upon Normative Integration","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Acta Criminologica","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Anomie; Political science; Sociology; Ethnology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.05271999832333377,"score_gpt":0.2340604714375503,"score_spread":0.18134047311421653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038347096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5397971,0.00077888794,0.0008304489,0.009073748,0.00006218361,0.000030366913,0.00006343148,0.000021766966,0.44934213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962838,0.00011461218,0.00008726297,0.00033708825,0.000023910943,0.000008949578,0.0000096963195,0.000007765575,0.0031269854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929636,0.0031355605,0.00019886,0.00049882976,0.0019097761,0.0012933776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97604024,0.012591755,0.0043202876,0.0010346154,0.0036655876,0.0023475236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044476343,0.00016207933,0.00029830608,0.0022226844,0.0037164576,0.006525389,0.000730838,0.0012435332,0.01143487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026661402,0.00018171084,0.00031681967,0.0014094764,0.008121846,0.0022854372,0.004327652,0.002356929,0.00047670578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014845977,0.00045022898,0.09592727,0.0000574057,0.00005684354,0.0007987771,0.012627327,0.0009832733,0.0006766499,0.84633344,0.003947164,0.03799318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104468345,0.00026051392,0.5002047,0.00043964785,0.00011782424,0.00073976687,0.026189184,0.0048986594,0.0016609441,0.38403088,0.08124116,0.00011215046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018677065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020954696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018677065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048174527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043643294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038253486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039751478","doi":"10.1177/0003603x1305800206","title":"Contested Mergers in Canada: The Tiger in the Cage","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Antitrust Bulletin","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Business; Mergers and acquisitions; Merger guidelines; Market definition; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Industrial organization; Market structure","score_opus":0.01944690161419395,"score_gpt":0.1737495347939838,"score_spread":0.15430263317978984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039751478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3599025,0.028926823,0.0037013001,0.29097256,0.0012938695,0.0001341888,0.0010237865,0.00018590072,0.31385908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9552498,0.0060288683,0.0009811643,0.015659843,0.00020380893,0.000016706728,0.00015225154,0.000040575153,0.02166699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922873,0.0008495235,0.0001635083,0.0005932499,0.003467479,0.0026390362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899249,0.002161946,0.0007639743,0.00039372937,0.0043324735,0.002422983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038455566,0.00020585328,0.00045562373,0.001839411,0.015157213,0.011127594,0.00152651,0.003753511,0.004821137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013809397,0.000346683,0.00045663505,0.0037991,0.009160408,0.0021484739,0.0030989558,0.0034676192,0.0003063526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001831707,0.00007451985,0.03119771,0.00015109501,0.00005969416,0.0020613673,0.007651685,0.0028510771,0.00091960555,0.7119013,0.15947571,0.08347303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011800832,0.00011104151,0.1337876,0.0006569402,0.00015840853,0.0010626671,0.027308356,0.0069335224,0.0013929346,0.07448852,0.7536079,0.000374026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9848015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9942092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11126025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11126025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14253817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80725336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040095158","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2013.0001","title":"Fuzzy rules and clear enough standards: The Uses and Abuses of &lt;i&gt;Pierson v Post&lt;/i&gt;","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Style (visual arts); Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Literature; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.01067645475033622,"score_gpt":0.17542192271973192,"score_spread":0.1647454679693957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040095158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1235931,0.023958812,0.026577743,0.28727663,0.0011064105,0.000049386344,0.000090525275,0.00006191093,0.53728557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97752315,0.002122659,0.0019905365,0.009265278,0.00017632199,0.0000387668,0.000012107165,0.000030026878,0.008841133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98335993,0.008443507,0.0005625006,0.0016040527,0.004921915,0.0011081053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863338,0.0095444415,0.0008118517,0.0012411202,0.0016586038,0.00041023365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014505235,0.00029019185,0.00044690177,0.0015517893,0.008724938,0.010707154,0.0012984885,0.0062875687,0.0012718975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028331975,0.00046895572,0.00035460637,0.0019056303,0.06147733,0.011493853,0.0045407503,0.009370065,0.00018311324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041909884,0.0000023546093,0.00012898861,0.0000096949725,0.0000015339176,0.000025233952,0.0056449845,0.000022841632,0.000018589571,0.9884857,0.0022321362,0.0034237693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000227733,0.00003136933,0.0015356492,0.0003535555,0.000018460047,0.00013859395,0.013159923,0.00068179634,0.00056494074,0.8518747,0.13156489,0.000053266158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06419271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06951086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06419271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013416781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008390108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12763816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040458755","doi":"10.1080/17440570902782402","title":"What is a criminal organization and why does the law care?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Crime","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Conviction; Harm; Punishment (psychology); Criminal law; Perspective (graphical); Criminal Conviction; Law; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01616977901392525,"score_gpt":0.2169947298813332,"score_spread":0.20082495086740795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040458755","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36389565,0.012635468,0.005847472,0.46820354,0.000721083,0.00006197284,0.00033177555,0.000056273428,0.14824675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98429376,0.004419138,0.00077065214,0.006612455,0.0005144459,0.000015647298,0.00008288346,0.00001828378,0.0032727441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696654,0.001144123,0.0001369048,0.00038440124,0.0006244574,0.00074359175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784082,0.006858908,0.006859196,0.0009880557,0.0030540703,0.0038315267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034208877,0.00016792536,0.00044037995,0.0022666901,0.0033742301,0.0053436486,0.0006657417,0.002482606,0.0041405773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019444065,0.00019456827,0.00023954659,0.0027430465,0.015884724,0.005935828,0.0012870358,0.0019710746,0.0006929903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005013758,0.00024404831,0.19027992,0.00029196002,0.00006593919,0.0010207929,0.010631617,0.001046609,0.00020449041,0.6382166,0.054568652,0.103379264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026015143,0.000057242403,0.14289615,0.00089203,0.000046104833,0.0011340781,0.026741652,0.0015615139,0.00019031535,0.7231249,0.1032609,0.000068985646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027233513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033452425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027233513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044537843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059241657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054149985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040771557","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.169","title":"LAW AND ECONOMICS IN THE LEGAL ACADEMY, OR, WHAT I SHOULD HAVE SAID TO DISCIPULUS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Sketch; Normative; Perspective (graphical); Audience measurement; Empirical legal studies; Dominance (genetics); Legal research; Legal realism; Political science; Positive economics; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.030816844686630884,"score_gpt":0.22232812137493319,"score_spread":0.1915112766883023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040771557","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010295573,0.019171871,0.0023759748,0.9514085,0.0075123734,0.0000053925883,0.000052889747,0.00004212253,0.018401332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19484822,0.0668873,0.012531654,0.5695349,0.09235561,0.00011999112,0.00013954422,0.0002203433,0.063362464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952798,0.0023556256,0.00018807605,0.0007183824,0.00092354795,0.00053462025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97972405,0.012418501,0.001133638,0.001961368,0.0026097107,0.0021527652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01012349,0.00046203684,0.00084067386,0.0018876167,0.005345385,0.015963953,0.0024627366,0.010049517,0.011767646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030149678,0.00032244573,0.00069645164,0.0017632943,0.03221021,0.026610112,0.005727104,0.012346736,0.0034423003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011345457,0.000020005371,0.00030570818,0.00011950853,0.000007750807,0.000023430486,0.0008169636,0.00015943265,0.000026827855,0.86957425,0.11771605,0.011218751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009034201,0.000011880048,0.00039964225,0.0004801388,0.000006225403,0.000044226446,0.0015330215,0.0003977743,0.0000679874,0.6903363,0.30669338,0.000020529857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008385265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077461894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015963953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074662175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00978497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054171383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042837389","doi":"10.7202/042383ar","title":"Les réactions de la doctrine à la création du droit par les juges : le droit des entreprises","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legal doctrine; Political science; Doctrine; Rationalization (economics); Law; Element (criminal law); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012042079263507068,"score_gpt":0.2048232007594032,"score_spread":0.19278112149589613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042837389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14175181,0.013838681,0.005596825,0.114814125,0.0011866164,0.000044469627,0.00012359332,0.000067330206,0.72257656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86482453,0.0035424824,0.00072783435,0.0070499238,0.0003243133,0.000019169947,0.000029940536,0.000047338326,0.123434454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962698,0.0011029682,0.00006123117,0.00043378433,0.0014326163,0.00069945905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963887,0.0018368829,0.00025612433,0.00016586334,0.0010433606,0.00030911408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042755688,0.0003907264,0.00026659298,0.0010187945,0.01186457,0.010476958,0.0012238263,0.005357982,0.00815427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062988256,0.00030460834,0.00040390814,0.0009225171,0.026269568,0.003587993,0.002890609,0.009013735,0.0008747748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022503054,0.000014680911,0.0011148497,0.000036814155,0.000004739207,0.00058688765,0.031448077,0.00020269347,0.00032348745,0.9427203,0.014984485,0.00854052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027267608,0.000027671424,0.0063969987,0.00028434696,0.000016068032,0.0005584081,0.040375117,0.00067327,0.00093080616,0.065779835,0.8848636,0.00006663763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64531887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6768603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64531887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04265285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016820768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71353984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042944647","doi":"10.1093/jleo/ewp040","title":"Information Acquisition and the Exclusion of Evidence in Trials","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Economics and Organization","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Prejudice (legal term); Order (exchange); Common law; Law; Exclusionary rule; Focus (optics); Law and economics; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.05322623210068891,"score_gpt":0.23963222680250934,"score_spread":0.18640599470182043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042944647","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36590302,0.0068442775,0.36650425,0.027011892,0.00034109777,0.00080785167,0.00043592803,0.00022157883,0.23193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97079945,0.0013149069,0.017911267,0.000865495,0.0004012133,0.00036927927,0.000099112265,0.00003939339,0.008199952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9512308,0.028310606,0.003722988,0.0043517635,0.008166975,0.0042167553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.65551364,0.28511682,0.028325254,0.016557133,0.008818552,0.0056686653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046312764,0.0007562357,0.0026636983,0.0026644634,0.0031293049,0.010341097,0.0025694207,0.005811873,0.010260411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2469423,0.001032928,0.0012872686,0.0019535043,0.015094708,0.015995556,0.007770416,0.0061302544,0.0013379705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000399048,0.00009612912,0.0027678376,0.00016853175,0.000064689986,0.0004981834,0.00080885907,0.0089573655,0.0006059109,0.96449804,0.0008425109,0.020292813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014124294,0.000096711985,0.0011320818,0.00008617794,0.000031616888,0.0001697073,0.000098257464,0.014794853,0.00036207604,0.98021907,0.002838843,0.000029258725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020138496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013623143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046312764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033804658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005617551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24492824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044319519","doi":"10.1093/jleo/ewq014","title":"Does Court Speed Shape Economic Activity? Evidence from a Court Reform in India","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Economics and Organization","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); State (computer science); Law reform; High Court; Economic reform; Business; Court decision; Law; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.016013283382122784,"score_gpt":0.20867009136677733,"score_spread":0.19265680798465454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044319519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993343,0.00021756689,0.00010992901,0.0011016247,0.000010680428,0.000014174903,0.00024246261,0.00000798917,0.0049524587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988248,0.00019649958,0.00005231004,0.00013053244,0.000018177827,0.000004107219,0.0001894377,0.0000035167075,0.0005805235],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799025,0.0005888624,0.00017304841,0.00025750668,0.00047867055,0.0005116621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95937884,0.0142421145,0.019798514,0.0019835704,0.0025736114,0.0020233556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016497162,0.00017131996,0.00045275243,0.0015122801,0.0012868225,0.0030256205,0.00079001725,0.0008127251,0.0039923238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016454719,0.0003055452,0.00043702748,0.0034356997,0.002022752,0.0012764211,0.0017333538,0.001628331,0.00043899348],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006631814,0.0007972584,0.96679384,0.000090140864,0.00025879403,0.00066538225,0.002708119,0.002486416,0.0009188021,0.0070077693,0.0026152243,0.014994971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031405252,0.00011497977,0.9946554,0.000015059814,0.000080444064,0.000052737647,0.0016135011,0.0006135705,0.00033246077,0.00067670806,0.0017966814,0.000017023181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069044106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07148991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069044106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026024724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017131062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13728446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046129872","doi":"10.7202/050767ar","title":"Arbitrability Restrictions in Action","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collective bargaining; Collective action; Service (business); Public sector; Public service; Action (physics); Test (biology); Process (computing); Tertiary sector of the economy; Political science; Business; Public administration; Law and economics; Public relations; Economics; Public economics; Labour economics; Law; Marketing; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06523728951334846,"score_gpt":0.24518240223301332,"score_spread":0.17994511271966485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046129872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027520139,0.0009566607,0.10268847,0.010883214,0.0005798303,0.0002745965,0.00029028105,0.0001365682,0.85667026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90832454,0.0006945583,0.010596347,0.002520728,0.0006604228,0.00046114152,0.00016823661,0.0000739497,0.07649997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840428,0.005047407,0.001013528,0.0022502008,0.005071852,0.0025741209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9382529,0.04551135,0.0041434644,0.008373881,0.002864166,0.0008542461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013239538,0.0006616365,0.0009893172,0.001674102,0.0027874676,0.005311401,0.0022594559,0.003669316,0.04963934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055769682,0.00053831877,0.0016400737,0.0014915031,0.009288478,0.006735697,0.0055071376,0.0064468835,0.0042750775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016350208,0.000013544823,0.00021512462,0.000015352774,0.0000070278866,0.00003985809,0.00017925836,0.0005854794,0.00007901805,0.99392927,0.001442006,0.0034777576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049638653,0.000024552113,0.00043385854,0.00005310271,0.00002224057,0.000047643334,0.00019350245,0.0033052475,0.00053760805,0.95951504,0.035802633,0.000014854986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005037318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036568828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04963934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032613315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040358305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16606015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046608926","doi":"10.3917/reco.586.1265","title":"Économie des procédures judiciaires","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.050296481531387785,"score_gpt":0.2243559328016843,"score_spread":0.17405945127029654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046608926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09126462,0.012071313,0.43583757,0.015424927,0.0005968594,0.00050387473,0.0008038867,0.00031266158,0.4431843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8672007,0.0074780253,0.060740493,0.0010407057,0.00078124565,0.00043562497,0.0003336035,0.00014771905,0.061841946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97303855,0.011745039,0.001412416,0.0025674694,0.009620393,0.0016162434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9591568,0.028772676,0.0029741724,0.004847229,0.0037445163,0.0005045623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011808234,0.00070196466,0.00094938936,0.0026320769,0.0021221703,0.005940098,0.001691027,0.003033161,0.01779456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044068016,0.0006352948,0.0014494343,0.0023896305,0.00700613,0.0046458864,0.0025262774,0.0050978204,0.0023519848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025887792,0.000025846277,0.0006880158,0.000094313466,0.00002433775,0.000041407176,0.00020464025,0.006525201,0.00034797867,0.97332,0.0017306169,0.016971681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046578843,0.00012574777,0.0037076056,0.00028688143,0.000044984685,0.00031971603,0.00027031926,0.02504932,0.0016769768,0.91346335,0.054969374,0.000039105216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007857428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038333177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01779456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006054368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057600364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06244862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048275905","doi":"10.7202/042968ar","title":"Le point de vue du Barreau du Québec","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007124300637544681,"score_gpt":0.1725926580785189,"score_spread":0.1654683574409742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048275905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09718077,0.012674894,0.0042027994,0.062325828,0.000919885,0.00007981466,0.00082515256,0.00013525508,0.82165563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5839462,0.002446832,0.0016114239,0.006979904,0.00008429595,0.00005697601,0.000149392,0.000068489135,0.4046564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876785,0.00021364666,0.000023303717,0.00022750313,0.00031283768,0.00045480128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991191,0.00013251811,0.000058476282,0.000057019468,0.00041969187,0.00021312339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080716086,0.00032506714,0.00036198343,0.0011255163,0.014153311,0.005173915,0.0010281913,0.0023107533,0.020643193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018198902,0.00023936234,0.00029761804,0.0014647509,0.005719002,0.0017217253,0.0014228163,0.0038394404,0.00089734315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007733768,0.000024520936,0.006444048,0.00012920992,0.000021979838,0.0006715077,0.020596033,0.00044407952,0.00073623593,0.8758137,0.05868671,0.03635459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020921914,0.000027349719,0.023456253,0.00049314473,0.000031130872,0.00017813724,0.016274694,0.00074005657,0.00046503035,0.01726437,0.94097704,0.000071952745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9890592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99458426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93836915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061630853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052735943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44716525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049095173","doi":"10.1177/0007650305274850","title":"Corporate Governance and Business Ethics in North America: The State of the Art","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business & Society","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Shareholder; Language change; Commission; Stock exchange; Legislation; Stakeholder; Accounting; Legislature; Economics; Business; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.039443283322512825,"score_gpt":0.20719737013772313,"score_spread":0.1677540868152103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049095173","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034466137,0.79644567,0.0014177968,0.14599515,0.0010654555,0.0000075019507,0.000027221864,0.000015174069,0.051579386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24854758,0.67941844,0.0027477357,0.051164936,0.010334478,0.00008248952,0.00007430456,0.00003784595,0.00759225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944922,0.0029291108,0.00025365374,0.000572486,0.0012871408,0.0004654318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795272,0.014285182,0.0013799594,0.0008460805,0.0028502475,0.001111354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007506633,0.00044495516,0.0009415043,0.0032139427,0.004963053,0.0135939615,0.0012444402,0.0073177577,0.004835794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012909166,0.0005065094,0.0004876537,0.004860435,0.029723806,0.012315876,0.0050704903,0.008544985,0.00066436944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003115456,0.000116790674,0.0025065085,0.001410903,0.000024390054,0.00014399241,0.0076266294,0.00042307115,0.00008016976,0.68441457,0.07048582,0.23273604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017891354,0.000030373967,0.007920082,0.008523539,0.000020367821,0.0002876733,0.0071491813,0.0005741651,0.000090831985,0.43223485,0.5431047,0.00004632855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03027476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038312633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03027476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0145957135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014719538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10589981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052442086","doi":"10.7202/043223ar","title":"Pour une réception de la théorie de l'imprévision en droit positif québécois","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00638547490760628,"score_gpt":0.20715604188902118,"score_spread":0.2007705669814149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052442086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088106334,0.0124152955,0.01595914,0.08630122,0.0004150494,0.00004229561,0.00019459674,0.00005771308,0.7965083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92890507,0.0032448338,0.0014855746,0.0032778454,0.0001014783,0.000029994551,0.000044430228,0.000037137543,0.06287369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821544,0.00059947144,0.000033966415,0.00024987376,0.0004425734,0.00045881938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769884,0.0010505437,0.00016239144,0.00019541444,0.0007006872,0.00019218952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033277643,0.00048202905,0.0004508175,0.0020002278,0.007221146,0.006137359,0.0015560455,0.0028531011,0.012248859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003626355,0.0003489845,0.00052226166,0.0019295013,0.022423727,0.004535081,0.0020235954,0.0046049035,0.00055226963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053543604,0.0000032108533,0.00035259148,0.000012133569,0.0000036360116,0.000058880305,0.0045182267,0.00013604379,0.00003857589,0.9915896,0.001532343,0.0017494217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029799137,0.000025217514,0.007839812,0.0005559256,0.000036448393,0.00019995807,0.014888473,0.0024020192,0.0005305074,0.71554136,0.25788456,0.000065821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68843824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71642494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31156176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04264392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015687304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052485272","doi":"10.5539/res.v5n1p19","title":"Miscounseling in Monopolistic Competition: A Case for Regulation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monopolistic competition; Credence; Credence good; Competition (biology); Honesty; Order (exchange); Business; Payment; Industrial organization; Product (mathematics); Product market; Microeconomics; Economics; Information asymmetry; Finance","score_opus":0.08231580497145151,"score_gpt":0.28003164376969797,"score_spread":0.19771583879824645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052485272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39563277,0.008936285,0.27156943,0.060113546,0.00049083814,0.00053316064,0.0002333671,0.00015304763,0.2623376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98682404,0.0012945898,0.005003651,0.0021055625,0.00029234693,0.00013503444,0.000014113473,0.000019275752,0.004311501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98964864,0.005855929,0.0002383053,0.0008886037,0.0015079799,0.0018605676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95603865,0.027999602,0.008909716,0.0033066443,0.0021974484,0.001547926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01436787,0.0006056949,0.0017350791,0.0014055931,0.0029451388,0.0058313133,0.0029104743,0.009699673,0.0069798687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029443584,0.00060226716,0.002238821,0.0010977063,0.020773806,0.008434832,0.0041071023,0.0070644915,0.0006752425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003351361,0.00008748023,0.00094564416,0.00006598255,0.000038932267,0.0004072556,0.00029905644,0.006729431,0.0003011738,0.9868836,0.0012516484,0.0029562672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084825595,0.00008739464,0.0010899507,0.000094407864,0.00004696632,0.00018087515,0.0003198379,0.022561545,0.00020457801,0.97166824,0.0036184539,0.000042919768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032028044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018559147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01436787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004233127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003068811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07598543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053230904","doi":"10.7202/051130ar","title":"Settlement Rates and Settlement Stages in Compulsory Interest Arbitration","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Compulsory arbitration; Political science; Economics; Law; Geography; Archaeology; Finance","score_opus":0.051646730138467906,"score_gpt":0.2463039685789663,"score_spread":0.1946572384404984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053230904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815832,0.00039061753,0.0043526194,0.00012729914,0.00001686527,0.00007626387,0.00015972463,0.000021018093,0.013272512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977162,0.00005875436,0.00079972716,0.0000060622983,0.0000069479934,0.00001788574,0.00007841528,0.000007608192,0.0013085639],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98870814,0.004856278,0.001213905,0.0009967318,0.0028955988,0.0013294976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91142076,0.052140675,0.023231719,0.0043693753,0.006472402,0.0023650916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018619658,0.00021722648,0.00045663858,0.0026735144,0.0008791605,0.0027895255,0.0010383886,0.00091401476,0.004999371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0896111,0.00038390723,0.00069753773,0.0018588373,0.002128651,0.0022005644,0.001603022,0.0012115701,0.0008469696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039463243,0.0005452186,0.76542586,0.0002566134,0.00026592775,0.0009630396,0.010070648,0.03305185,0.01446878,0.06443524,0.0014651476,0.10510542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007920045,0.00062848727,0.9600894,0.00007300937,0.000057524296,0.0005570293,0.002825213,0.011808629,0.004137927,0.015083213,0.004575673,0.0000846657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038894909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055853683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018619658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002116515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005982966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09847134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053524550","doi":"10.1051/larsg/2010031","title":"Lorsque le droit nord-américain des sociétés dessine les nouvelles frontières de l’entreprise : les clés pour un autre futur ?","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"La Revue des sciences de gestion/La Revue des sciences de gestion, Direction et gestion","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0909685176798383,"score_gpt":0.29781903537728593,"score_spread":0.20685051769744764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053524550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18848854,0.031998236,0.0062431665,0.18118715,0.0014378261,0.000021593116,0.00016593945,0.000048027232,0.5904095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90903664,0.009364446,0.0018823631,0.009175577,0.00034945502,0.000028365563,0.00007872571,0.000048470753,0.0700359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792236,0.000810374,0.000045719673,0.0003662616,0.00043138184,0.0004240427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974917,0.0008196839,0.00034361787,0.00022939012,0.0007688397,0.0003467093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025397118,0.0003011525,0.00036684336,0.0009404133,0.007870598,0.011869015,0.00076748984,0.002760908,0.007155922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003297222,0.0001761966,0.00033261377,0.0014512214,0.013688853,0.008113896,0.0027434065,0.0041650217,0.0010823486],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004047414,0.00002916072,0.003615427,0.00011469407,0.000018349143,0.0004172965,0.044511016,0.00024274387,0.0005442391,0.9225321,0.009675856,0.018258844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021179136,0.00004130247,0.014055321,0.0010115388,0.000023069439,0.0003076612,0.13666067,0.00031015518,0.0007372297,0.21728376,0.62949044,0.000057592995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06348289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11369107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06348289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008919381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0096939085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12622672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053923798","doi":"10.1108/eb026024","title":"To Bribe or Not to Bribe — A Less than Ethical Dilemma, Resolved?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Crime","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Dilemma; Government (linguistics); Language change; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Criminal law; Business","score_opus":0.08185593679189004,"score_gpt":0.2669476540333303,"score_spread":0.18509171724144027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053923798","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015195012,0.0028337156,0.0008522886,0.9814897,0.0016875307,0.0000036859371,0.000014352849,0.000008856703,0.011590245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30070192,0.012267304,0.0035907591,0.64328665,0.010169664,0.00007091176,0.00005894915,0.00017910698,0.029674718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796799,0.013324088,0.0006438053,0.0014220589,0.0025814618,0.0023486651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9698704,0.012705398,0.0025828267,0.001425445,0.0059231934,0.007492761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026148545,0.00049362826,0.00085183873,0.0013840517,0.009180672,0.019970598,0.0020971708,0.016402878,0.010657558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06956069,0.00041393004,0.00043414708,0.0011421117,0.047624376,0.02860205,0.005276449,0.022167385,0.0037889567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006138723,0.00009156874,0.0015321855,0.00013560579,0.00003728743,0.00027468643,0.008952992,0.00011930601,0.00021317675,0.5360698,0.38817063,0.06434136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003715653,0.000038595543,0.00095123943,0.00075519545,0.00002049657,0.0004664909,0.04488269,0.0002501224,0.0001745265,0.595824,0.3565339,0.00006558765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00739125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01300995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026148545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071321786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016700873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13828838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055120288","doi":"10.1506/2nfq-36pt-e6b1-wrn3","title":"Revenue Recognition: Judgment in the Spotlight / LA CONSTATATION DES PRODUITS: PLEINS FEUX SUR LE JUGEMENT","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Accounting Perspectives","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Humanities; Publics; Political science; Welfare economics; Economics; Philosophy; Accounting; Law","score_opus":0.03820600607729457,"score_gpt":0.2093172570588294,"score_spread":0.17111125098153482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055120288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4521255,0.013646601,0.014293995,0.11197091,0.0010684548,0.00015281967,0.0003788552,0.00015437389,0.40620854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97160083,0.0020543556,0.0016835788,0.0020693222,0.00017050398,0.000009893922,0.000040089115,0.000033115168,0.022338355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983881,0.0032926602,0.00042061624,0.00073435484,0.009986897,0.001684402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96231085,0.014004796,0.0046193884,0.0018634298,0.015916007,0.0012855942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014835188,0.00023099051,0.0003702907,0.002756381,0.0054468852,0.0098258145,0.0013429553,0.0013774957,0.006157058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050990857,0.00020281033,0.00025127997,0.0031827618,0.012158424,0.0026912522,0.0020348975,0.002413154,0.0005419566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020352476,0.00008073804,0.052804127,0.00028929763,0.00004014686,0.0013206314,0.047877062,0.0015927813,0.0015902722,0.57054496,0.05830928,0.26534718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049372986,0.00017525927,0.26764542,0.0014893869,0.00016399083,0.0011037079,0.07626983,0.0071116434,0.007884734,0.102011375,0.53572524,0.00037005983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6963182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75452024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6963182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032505825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027369622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61094046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055402064","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2011.00555.x","title":"John R. Commons and Max Weber: The Foundations of an Economic Sociology of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Montreal Council on Foreign Relations","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Sociology; Sociology of law; GRASP; Law; State (computer science); Dimension (graph theory); Law and economics; Economics; Positive economics; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.055526927750030944,"score_gpt":0.24521151348812917,"score_spread":0.1896845857380982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055402064","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013012139,0.20273341,0.061021265,0.45008603,0.006025789,0.000087101536,0.00035845654,0.00015665841,0.26651913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71128297,0.15657516,0.032145597,0.027176058,0.014949442,0.00047285072,0.00017565461,0.0002578744,0.05696441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974281,0.0013044977,0.00011113177,0.00024553871,0.0007430334,0.00016759973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99206597,0.006163323,0.00045537206,0.00038938186,0.0005324405,0.0003935944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045036357,0.0006896861,0.0008319233,0.003380919,0.003374665,0.0061959047,0.0009735813,0.0041929637,0.003267168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012684391,0.0006034243,0.00062989217,0.0031626294,0.018904438,0.012305154,0.0023243995,0.004792535,0.00081445824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047523595,0.000006206887,0.000059439943,0.000024125819,0.0000027089516,0.00001933234,0.00027309172,0.00030852875,0.000017109578,0.98711944,0.008943618,0.003221659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032170153,0.0000022976635,0.0000810922,0.00009502263,0.0000014691898,0.000012848048,0.00010743626,0.00031807186,0.000019827785,0.96442765,0.034924656,0.0000064348806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050762184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037519208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061959047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046954365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045009153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03406787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058214750","doi":"10.2202/1547-7355.1177","title":"North American Economic Integration and the Challenges Wrought by 9/11","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Economic integration; Institutional economics; Property rights; Field (mathematics); Economic impact analysis; Economics; Political science; Law and economics; Political economy; Law; International trade; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.011946775225002653,"score_gpt":0.1963648848972915,"score_spread":0.18441810967228886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058214750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6292296,0.0063114334,0.0016993108,0.15967515,0.00043624168,0.000017770148,0.00012303771,0.000026687807,0.20248066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98991805,0.0016822786,0.00038194572,0.0027258776,0.00012669853,0.000012519779,0.000032995136,0.000008426756,0.0051112743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979207,0.00077195984,0.000061002876,0.00020386622,0.00044049008,0.0006019608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997969,0.0004617999,0.0004906926,0.00015438398,0.0003768993,0.0005472287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003459675,0.000158798,0.00033063622,0.0011630434,0.0044101616,0.007949978,0.000559692,0.0018047986,0.0049634343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005119001,0.00018845123,0.00026745145,0.0019803718,0.005913874,0.0037332291,0.004163711,0.0033866742,0.00024158656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000683378,0.00008776873,0.025478976,0.000044584434,0.000031065818,0.0006133971,0.012473732,0.0010394435,0.00014038986,0.90369,0.015319238,0.041013047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000413748,0.00006097498,0.20245756,0.0005621322,0.00003816685,0.00051476085,0.060682073,0.0029114352,0.0003462694,0.41429693,0.31799412,0.00009413444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039377455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07220813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039377455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006766908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050628367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07829648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062295316","doi":"10.15764/er.2014.02005","title":"The Allocation of Costs under Rent Control","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SOP Transactions on Economic Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Control (management); Business; Cost allocation; Economics; Computer science; Accounting; Management","score_opus":0.07124806607461398,"score_gpt":0.3043007477781578,"score_spread":0.23305268170354382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062295316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3225714,0.002371983,0.19952504,0.016736118,0.00038970952,0.00021232721,0.00036101064,0.00017703605,0.45765537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825187,0.00025871873,0.0026924163,0.00024532378,0.00015656282,0.00005097783,0.000017185643,0.000027816206,0.014032301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952721,0.0019341464,0.00015654853,0.00063337194,0.0009290403,0.0010749049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99204016,0.004695408,0.0007034036,0.0011968529,0.0008464487,0.00051784184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004224816,0.0005563415,0.0012380972,0.0015300077,0.0015728957,0.0073839636,0.0015825682,0.0032532027,0.012075149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022379918,0.0005706085,0.0007096809,0.0013200312,0.007209338,0.0062288023,0.0019358479,0.0024784375,0.0005612163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032278032,0.000012119972,0.0001994163,0.000011299416,0.000010554787,0.00001591382,0.00006453234,0.0033402876,0.00009473796,0.9919133,0.0006260122,0.0036794974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020948348,0.000010207219,0.00058750703,0.000010988723,0.000011038435,0.000017203973,0.00007573265,0.011942893,0.00008241582,0.9853786,0.0018518015,0.000010588311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056428905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040230267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012075149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062643546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029665653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045451343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062489442","doi":"10.7202/1027091ar","title":"\"Browse-Wrap\" Contracts and Unfair Terms: What the Supreme Court Missed in Dell Computer Corporation v. Union des consommateurs et Dumoulin","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Corporation; Law; Political science; Combinatorics; Humanities; Mathematics; Art","score_opus":0.028252699839622905,"score_gpt":0.21814129189917056,"score_spread":0.18988859205954767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062489442","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07746105,0.018448355,0.006761917,0.6681706,0.0024464317,0.00008119448,0.0004053155,0.000073787895,0.22615148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70189697,0.0059675253,0.0017268981,0.25742957,0.0024694956,0.00012308749,0.0001557333,0.00012288013,0.030107772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97590536,0.0068053254,0.0012201439,0.002747563,0.008601466,0.0047201077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754553,0.017771356,0.0014209521,0.0014813758,0.002744725,0.0011263168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022696784,0.0004603028,0.000987959,0.0015160823,0.014507432,0.019728545,0.0028311631,0.032232203,0.005186479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051729526,0.0008083124,0.0010104154,0.0025067006,0.020078214,0.018781833,0.0071934983,0.031002838,0.00078253105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004694144,0.000020306397,0.0011694505,0.00003529529,0.000014421518,0.00043462933,0.0060380246,0.00016544423,0.00016921086,0.9012325,0.08093497,0.009738899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011724884,0.000079923215,0.004824862,0.00085568393,0.00011932921,0.0007020594,0.013133016,0.0008013983,0.0016251671,0.6736594,0.30382267,0.00025935285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057657253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09709354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94234276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012312419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012980953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12003344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063314782","doi":"10.1007/s10101-015-0160-2","title":"Deterring repeat offenders with escalating penalty schedules: a Bayesian approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics of Governance","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Deterrence (psychology); Punishment (psychology); Prior probability; Bayesian probability; Criminology; Public finance; Economics; Actuarial science; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04032208055499088,"score_gpt":0.1983693232995839,"score_spread":0.15804724274459303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063314782","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084993586,0.0009645326,0.8944535,0.0070565334,0.00010966609,0.00051168713,0.00034568264,0.0002179139,0.0113468915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87094116,0.0011386418,0.11890645,0.00081624254,0.0003427376,0.00044571832,0.00024849683,0.00005035719,0.0071102367],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903364,0.005939839,0.0003649992,0.0011610169,0.0013470685,0.00085067184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9511514,0.040423032,0.0037024356,0.0013139212,0.0024406046,0.00096869114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015311364,0.0012531673,0.0043487446,0.0027670537,0.0011290734,0.0029574472,0.00416702,0.0042663254,0.00589759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061600946,0.0017639559,0.0013019026,0.0016066518,0.0022364885,0.005195731,0.0024809404,0.004462059,0.00064159464],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003038496,0.00091018464,0.007909431,0.00028996673,0.0003433653,0.00023099461,0.00036724017,0.70391774,0.0005669322,0.18341185,0.006341295,0.095407136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009537019,0.00018360553,0.0018816848,0.00009748418,0.00009318431,0.00010791112,0.00011423671,0.8359875,0.00016876009,0.16012898,0.0010913656,0.000049928225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075850333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015229572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015311364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025163586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004429452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080975175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070896999","doi":"10.7202/050940ar","title":"Do Lawyers Affect Grievance Arbitration Outcomes? The Newfoundland Experience","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Affect (linguistics); Arbitration; Representation (politics); Outcome (game theory); Business; Law; Psychology; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.04307332617515589,"score_gpt":0.2502210437863476,"score_spread":0.2071477176111917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070896999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94630355,0.0005826996,0.00007807669,0.02262256,0.00005014562,0.000014698506,0.00012117599,0.000011134372,0.030216021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97735745,0.0005147318,0.000055913235,0.0018831241,0.000027157294,0.000008206179,0.000082183215,0.000009016086,0.020062372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973447,0.000674043,0.000082347455,0.00015436717,0.00044542938,0.0012991974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887515,0.0038697058,0.002801582,0.00047476948,0.0011500237,0.002952401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034916156,0.000099853925,0.000310148,0.0006535156,0.004532098,0.0033902652,0.0008963106,0.0014389073,0.013129326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011551898,0.00020996056,0.00018164502,0.000796788,0.0026859203,0.0016668203,0.0018820988,0.0025919753,0.00089463696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055955007,0.0026429864,0.7667859,0.00007832407,0.000086677166,0.0026967805,0.055183407,0.00113268,0.0008190296,0.013712189,0.06219658,0.09410589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065838816,0.00015239306,0.8947022,0.00014483443,0.000029503635,0.0003631985,0.056243956,0.00048990693,0.00040326786,0.0014959059,0.04585256,0.000056414483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7145164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91299546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2854836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014878213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075915614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57432973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072493460","doi":"10.1007/s40273-014-0176-4","title":"Transparency in Reimbursement Decisions: In Whose Best Interest?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PharmacoEconomics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Reimbursement; Health economics; Quality of Life Research; Health administration; Business; Accounting; Public health; Public interest; Actuarial science; Medicine; Economics; Health care; Nursing; Political science","score_opus":0.0801949536739273,"score_gpt":0.29556486691926864,"score_spread":0.21536991324534133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072493460","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00764321,0.009323465,0.0067599816,0.95376277,0.0015697444,0.000030988595,0.0001458011,0.000043748463,0.020720193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76967657,0.009424734,0.0044844314,0.19679475,0.015696889,0.00012957478,0.00012059087,0.00010583263,0.0035666348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9196678,0.048266593,0.0040919203,0.0051246826,0.015204185,0.0076448154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5577381,0.3371497,0.04965529,0.010514139,0.031149246,0.0137934275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09345756,0.0005650896,0.0023449478,0.0026336748,0.0037298454,0.025960023,0.0033739223,0.027392441,0.008813233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.365931,0.00090764783,0.0011330545,0.0031117497,0.017856313,0.029635994,0.003999511,0.02617157,0.0012438311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003395485,0.00018948404,0.0079740165,0.0004440698,0.00020929094,0.00027957253,0.0015339282,0.0016955121,0.00022408651,0.8284533,0.09692398,0.06173319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020002671,0.00005399364,0.0054759593,0.0011581776,0.00010335787,0.00019733768,0.0014298325,0.0032535126,0.00035526507,0.9485295,0.03912589,0.000117116564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013754048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012551213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09345756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0130534135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024507806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49425673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076486657","doi":"10.2307/3505213","title":"10.2307/3505213","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doxastic logic; Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Obligation; Epistemology; Philosophy of medicine; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Psychology; Politics; Medicine; Comparative law","score_opus":0.014555348613014286,"score_gpt":0.16487030364076422,"score_spread":0.15031495502774994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076486657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028794547,0.00028228457,0.00044877623,0.00030809338,0.00036814986,0.00004766451,0.0012627823,0.00068748824,0.9963068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009834494,0.00023745453,0.00035917314,0.00029675447,0.00008080524,0.00002540999,0.0013834758,0.00031561917,0.996318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994618,0.000042854263,0.000039573435,0.00015435532,0.00021655242,0.0000848033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983222,0.00032733468,0.0000708929,0.00032438274,0.00044347887,0.00051170297],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073015015,0.001547407,0.0011203084,0.00233937,0.001616252,0.004890875,0.0018288741,0.0025880383,0.9849337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001801919,0.0007666404,0.00074532937,0.0027674208,0.0016902905,0.0049809315,0.0038015263,0.0015480304,0.98581576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014530924,0.00012677046,0.00043009486,0.0003191322,0.000012977619,0.00016219307,0.00006632072,0.0001733408,0.0015350145,0.0073984945,0.62331325,0.36631703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020976573,0.000026718702,0.00066142675,0.00012558294,0.000004905731,0.00013259321,0.00008711869,0.00012433417,0.00021381375,0.0012844593,0.9973047,0.000013388259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038503895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042616976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015066326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011577124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012806992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021490276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076998095","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0059","title":"Access to justice and beyond","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Adjudication; Economic Justice; Scholarship; Tribunal; Political science; Law and economics; Politics; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.018811540854771994,"score_gpt":0.2066464900329916,"score_spread":0.1878349491782196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076998095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011790264,0.017716315,0.0057473714,0.076740324,0.00069571816,0.000019857553,0.000073482515,0.000036328365,0.8871804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8593934,0.009316233,0.001303842,0.0243872,0.0024061617,0.0000764538,0.0000675948,0.00007960726,0.10296947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943481,0.0019364941,0.00014562081,0.00082183117,0.0014711333,0.0012769183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957898,0.0018795104,0.00025901909,0.00052641385,0.00062904967,0.0009161706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004116262,0.00028639226,0.0005565295,0.001648308,0.009134684,0.0110593345,0.0012259224,0.005563848,0.016987205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008325009,0.00020897413,0.00040967096,0.0012717745,0.030516664,0.010273638,0.010778338,0.0055929953,0.0014009131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031670515,0.000005094599,0.00007278032,0.000008823581,0.0000013977732,0.000023990562,0.0013751995,0.000026541053,0.00001997483,0.9909402,0.0033305155,0.004192392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005313094,0.000014989079,0.00047905283,0.00025130884,0.0000035904625,0.00008817412,0.0014521106,0.00008097195,0.000053692696,0.7239297,0.27363047,0.000010575835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015419122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011596471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016987205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00802817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071967617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0582487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077331864","doi":"10.1007/s10101-010-0086-7","title":"When is it efficient to treat juvenile offenders more leniently than adult offenders?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics of Governance","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Juvenile; Juvenile delinquency; Economic Justice; Criminology; Psychology; Deterrence (psychology); Incentive; Recidivism; Economics; Biology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.021641021851341726,"score_gpt":0.20971863636027568,"score_spread":0.18807761450893395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077331864","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3316108,0.009363016,0.012677742,0.58499223,0.0017626233,0.00025919237,0.00066363026,0.000056659923,0.058614172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9549483,0.0022344606,0.0031831437,0.035345133,0.0012357293,0.00016191042,0.00009681334,0.000032935906,0.0027615598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98184836,0.010322651,0.00087430427,0.0011613796,0.0018073727,0.003985842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94227535,0.025604574,0.014227646,0.0013154563,0.005843306,0.010733601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023501841,0.00027500026,0.0012169506,0.0014464498,0.0013842534,0.005830722,0.0016768035,0.0047762445,0.0067358916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09760214,0.00039956928,0.0005594085,0.0013643652,0.005164168,0.0062868358,0.0018776917,0.0037540584,0.0009496441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019242119,0.002377484,0.20487027,0.001672616,0.001340308,0.0008904044,0.0030038871,0.016637744,0.0027328958,0.35040402,0.11717817,0.29696798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015437712,0.0013538076,0.27935264,0.0046228277,0.00070499256,0.0013136222,0.015764646,0.016733116,0.0032816024,0.6156751,0.05942904,0.00022480951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055089504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010676403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023501841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052787596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01076009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12429112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077500749","doi":"10.7202/043069ar","title":"Grands pas et faux pas de l'abus de droit contractuel","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014968521998442149,"score_gpt":0.20797287378483872,"score_spread":0.19300435178639658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077500749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05516022,0.0056980588,0.010257664,0.02012065,0.0010483407,0.0001038746,0.00020374332,0.00007576508,0.90733176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4815232,0.0042078523,0.00641212,0.008310543,0.0004261109,0.00015230148,0.00018875857,0.00016235895,0.49861673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952094,0.0010522181,0.00020046382,0.00074482977,0.00221002,0.0005831229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959645,0.0012983396,0.0004541259,0.00047786912,0.0014848737,0.0003202869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025815046,0.00051457,0.0003159594,0.0010174749,0.0057003754,0.0076221917,0.001193298,0.003039313,0.017486645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066537773,0.00034319662,0.0005080933,0.0009861506,0.0075196754,0.0036221864,0.0032709467,0.0051165586,0.0025300703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050116345,0.000034289467,0.0033967884,0.00015753822,0.00001898016,0.00047213022,0.013601214,0.00027575376,0.002333509,0.92285925,0.016798925,0.0400014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010002593,0.00004816893,0.008516215,0.00053586124,0.000021778587,0.00070906355,0.010731852,0.0005134287,0.002397177,0.06299592,0.9134576,0.000063007494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06315122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09406004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06315122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054631517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060988367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12556726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078512275","doi":"10.1506/v1tu-aw8j-5fya-glpw","title":"Private Predecision Information, Performance Measure Congruity, and the Value of Delegation*","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delegation; Private information retrieval; Agency (philosophy); Incentive; Value (mathematics); Perfect information; Principal–agent problem; Microeconomics; Measure (data warehouse); Business; Linkage (software); Imperfect; Relation (database); Actuarial science; Economics; Computer science; Computer security; Finance; Data mining; Management","score_opus":0.05503055321737454,"score_gpt":0.26710443381644267,"score_spread":0.21207388059906812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078512275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.824082,0.0019476934,0.08870568,0.003977918,0.00006382682,0.00011313039,0.00020919448,0.00006498081,0.08083542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976708,0.000086657965,0.0017931119,0.000037074697,0.000018616529,0.000011480287,0.000011327952,0.0000053847575,0.00036548445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839242,0.009870217,0.00087608,0.0011102125,0.0029948151,0.0012244378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8232388,0.1301178,0.024999252,0.013028864,0.005903503,0.002711891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024948586,0.0003695239,0.0011234462,0.0017581282,0.0012297912,0.0074967737,0.0009924595,0.0018170488,0.005470037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13389012,0.0004930978,0.0004956179,0.0018612028,0.006175424,0.007970444,0.0037595246,0.0021422012,0.00026792972],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008183963,0.0004084186,0.029104166,0.00028314083,0.00018294445,0.00029561206,0.002759564,0.044019543,0.0013321537,0.870649,0.0007659573,0.04938125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010415859,0.0002587983,0.02078246,0.00017218555,0.0001134846,0.00023006168,0.0010548889,0.060093172,0.0020863144,0.91147816,0.0035370835,0.00008919035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013751987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009027571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024948586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039134403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021025115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13194227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078724444","doi":"10.7202/1005135ar","title":"The Downside of Preclusion: Some Behavioural and Economic Effects of Cause of Action Estoppel in Civil Actions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Estoppel; Settlement (finance); Action (physics); Incentive; Economics; Law and economics; Civil procedure; Public economics; Political science; Law; Microeconomics; Doctrine; Finance","score_opus":0.07155397311586166,"score_gpt":0.24123812288777446,"score_spread":0.16968414977191282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078724444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5045335,0.002777142,0.20552048,0.015584804,0.00028489833,0.00043469743,0.00012287934,0.00010396222,0.27063763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881981,0.00039078505,0.0070658284,0.0007463112,0.000082859595,0.00010008997,0.00001150662,0.00002075338,0.0033838712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815638,0.008721274,0.0012237497,0.0019446911,0.0047959485,0.0017506117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9118254,0.067084804,0.00964885,0.0073871794,0.0031306832,0.0009230981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018139457,0.00052498776,0.0010580311,0.001310994,0.002542117,0.0047910158,0.00211313,0.0044058254,0.00643177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055974457,0.0005833274,0.0020314471,0.0010618804,0.016273834,0.0064502503,0.0065955026,0.007552979,0.0003538894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008563964,0.00008721429,0.0042097485,0.00009608744,0.000035240173,0.0001706715,0.00064293866,0.00834647,0.0004595809,0.97186553,0.00030491565,0.013695883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007013599,0.00030775426,0.009201894,0.00014664902,0.00011015518,0.00030251496,0.00067849725,0.013907092,0.0013789354,0.96624714,0.007576894,0.00007240928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004011143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039050996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018139457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033016722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026696536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09593171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082116621","doi":"10.7202/043912ar","title":"La « levée du voile corporatif » en vertu du Code civil du Québec : des perspectives théoriques et empiriques à la lumière de dix années de jurisprudence","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010074400755803372,"score_gpt":0.2157124399308821,"score_spread":0.20563803917507872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082116621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41156146,0.02771265,0.01344838,0.071274534,0.00038990114,0.000113792266,0.0006051221,0.00005490829,0.4748393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631495,0.0038859218,0.0010707391,0.00140388,0.00006533685,0.000044215947,0.00008181114,0.000025982708,0.030272681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958656,0.0013409022,0.00008031836,0.0004515567,0.0013743014,0.0008873199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99224055,0.0031353654,0.00064061745,0.0003210765,0.003111997,0.00055040047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003861483,0.00043496772,0.00050367176,0.0033655744,0.012115317,0.010167522,0.0015603082,0.002157506,0.00565927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008086506,0.0003308459,0.00034734214,0.0042596743,0.018638723,0.0031681769,0.0017435314,0.0039082468,0.00025685751],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000311378,0.000028922354,0.0131572485,0.00019319238,0.000033537115,0.00032306247,0.10148954,0.0015382756,0.00030807583,0.8434504,0.010955124,0.028491376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001917818,0.0000885194,0.14656655,0.0022762322,0.000110130146,0.0002448219,0.17574786,0.005778395,0.0009350694,0.10975487,0.55828553,0.00019284032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96162623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97473836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09541289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09541289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07321799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6922722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083704626","doi":"10.7202/042771ar","title":"Specific performance of contracts in comparative law : some preliminary observations","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03846242120777645,"score_gpt":0.21579866160319053,"score_spread":0.17733624039541407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083704626","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30239812,0.010278499,0.0042142705,0.008568304,0.00009355368,0.00009726504,0.000226924,0.000039289032,0.6740837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759187,0.0030837152,0.0006835094,0.0005451044,0.00013963119,0.000073386414,0.00012771858,0.000027086428,0.019401092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965898,0.0014656793,0.00012995128,0.0004072762,0.0007774682,0.00062985433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910703,0.0058250953,0.0011886366,0.0005711918,0.001030829,0.0003139924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058514634,0.00030385394,0.00040818437,0.004368732,0.0063456884,0.005593863,0.00092585495,0.0018845872,0.015942065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014010093,0.00035867302,0.00037514843,0.00760786,0.012682837,0.010968833,0.0037832789,0.0023246903,0.0005119284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056599063,0.00004947093,0.0040303655,0.00016953307,0.0000072441553,0.00028746066,0.058553025,0.0001393092,0.00031273064,0.9213576,0.0021232367,0.012913426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000587093,0.00032598912,0.1325833,0.0009573543,0.000051401646,0.0009930186,0.14821635,0.00087612815,0.0020212096,0.33002424,0.38382113,0.00007118971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02493459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04295596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02493459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009846644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002377505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07144272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084222991","doi":"10.1111/1097-3923.00031","title":"Insurance Taxation and Insurance Fraud","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Moral hazard; Casualty insurance; Insurance policy; Auto insurance risk selection; Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Key person insurance; Incentive; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.020958609143095625,"score_gpt":0.20407933684684984,"score_spread":0.1831207277037542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084222991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3724014,0.03419649,0.059626844,0.065661475,0.0009101205,0.00015498341,0.0002691371,0.000080203536,0.46669933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829805,0.0043281545,0.0015877779,0.0012592723,0.0003257862,0.000020490419,0.000029414443,0.00000716361,0.009461545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828714,0.00072893134,0.000085763495,0.00013366481,0.00037704213,0.00038737478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99503577,0.0024434072,0.0013549975,0.00040860547,0.0005109054,0.00024633989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002248245,0.0002555226,0.0004482058,0.0012105452,0.0021888649,0.00412493,0.00042210007,0.0032479682,0.0060881833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011089592,0.00025065808,0.00047909716,0.001053225,0.0039097304,0.0035895992,0.0018507509,0.002915068,0.0005056867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019194047,0.000041629035,0.0032565717,0.000025135549,0.000008292413,0.00017483975,0.00021971682,0.0024063506,0.00008504106,0.9817617,0.0024889975,0.0095123965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002822242,0.00003330444,0.0037636084,0.00017190653,0.000019279876,0.0003442811,0.00028256557,0.008917092,0.00025474874,0.96250397,0.023660075,0.000020959184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004610605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021659876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060881833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002859408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021126533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020746589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087464937","doi":"10.5195/jlc.2008.35","title":"The Enron Collapse and Criminal Liabilities of Auditors and Lawyers for Defective Prospectuses in the United States, Australia and Canada: a Review","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Law and Commerce","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prospectus; Legislation; Law; Imprisonment; Business; Accounting; Issuer; Audit; Securities fraud; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.07290212865282297,"score_gpt":0.28592438074070453,"score_spread":0.21302225208788156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087464937","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049079536,0.9984079,0.000029487273,0.00030932165,0.00006635244,0.000010978521,0.000041877025,0.0000016801974,0.000641695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022707141,0.9972249,0.000057285895,0.00018648565,0.0000700186,0.0000056523627,0.000030872347,0.0000013830879,0.00015267487],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998365,0.00021539419,0.00032141147,0.00019067987,0.000775236,0.000132196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98142207,0.009181271,0.0023973628,0.00017407045,0.0061000437,0.0007251712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003538229,0.0006822239,0.0016942951,0.014015231,0.0012127322,0.0034737713,0.0016809482,0.0018608618,0.002622805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009774936,0.0007326123,0.0013680643,0.016419303,0.0023160593,0.0021592581,0.0009498802,0.0015059793,0.00034470495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014805284,0.00016416628,0.010306138,0.11633478,0.0005207995,0.00047751766,0.0022249436,0.00049979513,0.00032992315,0.006984584,0.046568733,0.8154406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021979948,0.00021761417,0.054238625,0.15905765,0.001825128,0.0020863712,0.0025788748,0.00040420934,0.00042721382,0.0013800268,0.77763194,0.00013043378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37402183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.536272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6259782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008868479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039475076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74368954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087973343","doi":"10.7202/1026133ar","title":"Portrait of Development Risk as a Young Defence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Portrait; Curiosity; Scope (computer science); Jurisprudence; Subject (documents); Sketch; Political science; Law; Psychology; History; Social psychology; Computer science; Art history","score_opus":0.020679430430671067,"score_gpt":0.20089128139458112,"score_spread":0.18021185096391007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087973343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011811385,0.014835828,0.057148162,0.08094612,0.00091642956,0.000052403928,0.00010230205,0.00006279248,0.83412474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8207304,0.014663242,0.014409472,0.017728727,0.0031332124,0.00024063,0.00008158249,0.00019507192,0.12881768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979631,0.00081085926,0.000055253993,0.0003406162,0.00066062645,0.00016967536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977724,0.0013280843,0.00018627048,0.00025526623,0.00029581063,0.00016211974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029582137,0.00047842128,0.00032412825,0.001706988,0.0037520686,0.0074504246,0.0012195818,0.0045092897,0.0050081597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051027224,0.00023857513,0.00044096136,0.0011249402,0.02450628,0.006822869,0.0032695807,0.008222353,0.0010901428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.166169e-7,0.0000013512977,0.000017661203,0.0000024312435,2.3265123e-7,0.000013736246,0.00031832108,0.000050813233,0.000011746532,0.9983736,0.000637524,0.00057190575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003678566,0.000007944149,0.000078744415,0.00004902547,0.0000014899392,0.000094857074,0.00031386566,0.0003870471,0.000049357328,0.86836904,0.13064012,0.0000048770735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002446022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017373867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004645562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033496355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03370601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089124188","doi":"10.7202/042178ar","title":"Les exigences de l'impartialité quasi-judiciaire","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Appeal; Economic Justice; Judicial review; Tribunal; Majority opinion; Dissent; Politics","score_opus":0.02332848771737887,"score_gpt":0.22638770364850405,"score_spread":0.2030592159311252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089124188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017783582,0.009550933,0.03889657,0.27073288,0.010435124,0.0001581522,0.0004286883,0.0003568126,0.6516573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6396094,0.0023852235,0.017809428,0.115142666,0.0074452423,0.00075987255,0.0001481036,0.00024590714,0.2164542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749287,0.007778848,0.0010460537,0.003740032,0.009423567,0.0030828512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867372,0.008513993,0.0006437682,0.0017282491,0.0019818887,0.00039488793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016223073,0.0007365345,0.0012760711,0.00068392325,0.0071828947,0.013843552,0.0034029228,0.013401269,0.005692726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026108736,0.00074733363,0.0013169121,0.00073298655,0.015038617,0.006595024,0.0030736479,0.025623586,0.00214948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008649877,0.00000523483,0.000044769582,0.000010090746,0.0000044779463,0.000047586487,0.00042296678,0.000065122396,0.000077591256,0.98599535,0.011663034,0.0016550409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007254264,0.000062909945,0.001037275,0.00016772033,0.000017451193,0.00022482793,0.00054411683,0.0017164508,0.0009796779,0.36199588,0.6330947,0.00008640101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021195646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020079115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021195646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008607552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005218608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08579683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089615475","doi":"10.7202/042984ar","title":"Pour une révision de l'Avant-projet dans une perspective de déjudiciarisation","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0146717005374021,"score_gpt":0.2252338990656998,"score_spread":0.2105621985282977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089615475","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04765256,0.023283008,0.03314835,0.51178414,0.0043361993,0.00016564575,0.00036038787,0.00015842699,0.37911123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7431081,0.010342034,0.017861838,0.057524692,0.0016845386,0.0002452531,0.00019351262,0.0001730629,0.1688669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906529,0.00479779,0.00023308033,0.0009604717,0.002093596,0.0012621286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889914,0.0035703154,0.0007684959,0.00080632896,0.0042214505,0.0016420797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010287495,0.0007167701,0.00059580954,0.002304849,0.013740259,0.011227651,0.0031538997,0.0074420404,0.00925501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009308552,0.00030428095,0.00073857076,0.0026965006,0.033388123,0.008775433,0.0040043,0.012931179,0.0012600182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017285201,0.00002322133,0.0010872278,0.00010865205,0.000008343208,0.00021710515,0.030823747,0.00018174428,0.00017485113,0.9399691,0.017867368,0.009521326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024729181,0.00006655214,0.008553226,0.0010081993,0.00003356888,0.00038424507,0.05098439,0.0014041194,0.00047119881,0.25888488,0.67806745,0.00011746651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45216727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59784627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45216727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032853648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04160523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89907074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090847989","doi":"10.7202/043548ar","title":"L'ordre public en droit économique : contrats, concurrence, consommation","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01844791758961374,"score_gpt":0.2005649037757554,"score_spread":0.18211698618614164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090847989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05011169,0.017537734,0.011872719,0.17934641,0.0013559064,0.0000894347,0.00012822873,0.00011929307,0.7394387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7812944,0.005159292,0.0023602552,0.015733646,0.0007921113,0.00011825645,0.000057751222,0.00014455752,0.1943397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822741,0.0064911097,0.00038800365,0.0019921544,0.0065024635,0.0023521641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879161,0.005140761,0.0008045112,0.0010880168,0.004270457,0.0007801956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012755872,0.0005190228,0.0005999311,0.0025102443,0.013257672,0.021732777,0.001821542,0.004629158,0.0072792713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021317773,0.0004936471,0.0004495517,0.003163181,0.03169349,0.006417005,0.006528747,0.0069546807,0.00124845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018172675,0.00000960938,0.00076048874,0.000057668658,0.000009347,0.00012047881,0.0162468,0.0002014078,0.00012287051,0.9517627,0.017534774,0.01315559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025327035,0.000022665019,0.0050284523,0.0005456293,0.000039108083,0.00014174043,0.027686836,0.0010623225,0.00052956975,0.24176852,0.72307765,0.00007229678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42832088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45061523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42832088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046371393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040688336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85165554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091578896","doi":"10.7202/043605ar","title":"L'interprétation du cautionnement : une approche nouvelle quant à la formation et à la détermination du contenu du contrat","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010176786961701637,"score_gpt":0.21226593706698985,"score_spread":0.20208915010528822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091578896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017034892,0.008199518,0.2688774,0.18319981,0.0055298107,0.00028668574,0.00039247153,0.0002429956,0.5162365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72681266,0.0041780323,0.07911786,0.07987771,0.0060518202,0.0010713137,0.00022873956,0.00040129502,0.102260545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9482774,0.026878849,0.0027644131,0.008570469,0.011235851,0.002273052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96301347,0.019317724,0.002993633,0.005745605,0.008193395,0.00073614507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027508017,0.0018204179,0.0018273471,0.0023052262,0.0071819257,0.015133023,0.0068368167,0.018768085,0.011587113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05946413,0.0010494041,0.0027027153,0.0016675895,0.038175244,0.01304683,0.006811786,0.018704215,0.0027299451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026343181,0.000008848551,0.00029056243,0.00008092725,0.000023120772,0.0001091779,0.0022325923,0.00025086608,0.00014478611,0.9847772,0.006693285,0.0053623263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027352535,0.000027548642,0.00044490394,0.00037985848,0.000047130372,0.00013810664,0.00092959387,0.0010118007,0.0005074563,0.911674,0.08474854,0.000063678846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009259379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008661377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027508017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008564122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010763116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14547807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W209201408","doi":"10.1017/s193029750000365x","title":"How do defendants choose their trial court? Evidence for a heuristic processing account","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judgment and Decision Making","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Acquittal; Conviction; Innocence; Criminal justice; Trial court; Sentence; Remand (court procedure); Psychology; Law; Political science; Criminology; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.10973734198360975,"score_gpt":0.29452269146598575,"score_spread":0.18478534948237602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W209201408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96287704,0.00017940423,0.009692661,0.0016661909,0.000022162285,0.00008754577,0.00030558693,0.000032501448,0.025136838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99765956,0.00005085603,0.0016109693,0.00015572217,0.000014988364,0.00001770268,0.00010797315,0.000009806436,0.00037246724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628687,0.002058379,0.00018781518,0.0005375904,0.00057426107,0.00035512264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9518019,0.036379155,0.0060810973,0.0033304398,0.0011387763,0.0012686757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065631703,0.00028649715,0.00046912095,0.0011113161,0.000768836,0.0039031692,0.00080485473,0.0016845263,0.014568675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055221222,0.00036771118,0.00048263118,0.0010999626,0.0018326282,0.0035823768,0.0014594404,0.0012453604,0.00063768245],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056245388,0.0024231267,0.52017194,0.00093260745,0.00080935244,0.0024640076,0.013477537,0.023362052,0.008618314,0.2722735,0.008899172,0.14094393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008632634,0.0004963985,0.34750116,0.00023213489,0.00032167017,0.0013176369,0.007229477,0.10537259,0.0020582385,0.52867585,0.0057425974,0.00018901072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018897238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021438634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014568675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007072183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005447473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04873711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093616951","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-7976.2011.01238.x","title":"The Origins, Nature, and Content of the Right to Property: Five Economic Solitudes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Liberalism; Law and economics; Political science; Positive economics; Neoclassical economics; Economics; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02654703727519148,"score_gpt":0.1705086349631549,"score_spread":0.14396159768796343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093616951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2163608,0.025388265,0.09645812,0.077137634,0.0004161612,0.00011591307,0.00018733102,0.000080658945,0.58385515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97523075,0.004743575,0.008530378,0.0014229681,0.00026213066,0.00007323921,0.00005424896,0.000032902433,0.009649743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974039,0.0010190569,0.00015132,0.0003524402,0.00078066025,0.00029254134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99003345,0.007136218,0.0008103811,0.0008894567,0.00068652816,0.00044395818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054896805,0.00037846,0.0005266754,0.0025453619,0.0024328954,0.0102774305,0.0011553636,0.0047609466,0.005634602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009479318,0.0005330708,0.00081914995,0.0017177353,0.04023331,0.021557229,0.0056512766,0.005022331,0.00038960794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009207397,0.000009441642,0.0003771319,0.000016405054,0.000002418025,0.000019264142,0.00045905047,0.00014712206,0.000038452283,0.9959556,0.00012144745,0.002844387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056174026,0.0000057073603,0.0006680304,0.0000645203,0.000004395421,0.000029501034,0.0004288421,0.00044885403,0.00010092399,0.99274844,0.005488488,0.0000067092387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012066092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010520453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99879336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051487624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020788072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037357092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094814504","doi":"10.1111/0008-4085.00052","title":"Switching costs and screening efficiency of incomplete contracts","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare economics; Microeconomics; Negotiation; Humanities; Economics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.08981439337899942,"score_gpt":0.17914746414547372,"score_spread":0.0893330707664743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094814504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7056161,0.0016599572,0.23016265,0.0025935175,0.00006304487,0.00040796405,0.0005964834,0.00039823013,0.05850205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805542,0.0006236458,0.007977521,0.00013159786,0.000048588652,0.0001580075,0.0001670513,0.000047868296,0.010291422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922713,0.0040942,0.00043952157,0.0006811846,0.0011777494,0.0013359046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8185557,0.14756233,0.021581225,0.007061624,0.0030391256,0.0021999674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014975673,0.0007957489,0.0022703132,0.0029092983,0.0010214925,0.004526955,0.0026606976,0.0026854274,0.015084456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08277745,0.0010342735,0.0017070376,0.002768965,0.004214167,0.006004842,0.0026067845,0.0020100973,0.00079263916],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000691436,0.00036495653,0.0130666485,0.00038416588,0.00021589393,0.0004923801,0.0009086272,0.21935439,0.0019598282,0.711119,0.0026137112,0.048829064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027440864,0.0003168221,0.006175131,0.00014957905,0.00011142708,0.00022118792,0.00039219376,0.4906759,0.0011155887,0.49838796,0.0020946476,0.000085013744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039158333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019299907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015084456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048931544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025678778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07919985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094883681","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00746.x","title":"Contract Formalization and Governance of Exporter–Importer Relationships","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Corporate governance; Industrial organization; Mechanism (biology); Profit (economics); Test (biology); Transaction cost; Microeconomics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.0558722037789472,"score_gpt":0.2485782803773798,"score_spread":0.1927060765984326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094883681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81139797,0.00049988314,0.111398086,0.0033813291,0.000035276535,0.00014169286,0.00012436017,0.00008409384,0.072937205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963057,0.000073416035,0.0027179976,0.000030805142,0.000010880459,0.000020177382,0.0000250645,0.0000036438125,0.0008122572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668807,0.0018361903,0.00031569126,0.00037934017,0.00049861846,0.00028202843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97849894,0.009780216,0.006777449,0.002636338,0.0013823378,0.0009246256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005423251,0.00009819037,0.00021423085,0.0007848185,0.00093778543,0.0032775765,0.00042905935,0.0008517072,0.0043818248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01945777,0.00018038764,0.00018944246,0.0008743577,0.0042985696,0.004007529,0.0014491272,0.0009306059,0.00013856568],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017504357,0.000054274682,0.007904331,0.000021505466,0.000007681046,0.00007782294,0.0011832983,0.005120934,0.00049127574,0.9768374,0.0004015322,0.007882527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071302515,0.00008503005,0.019403275,0.00010411017,0.000027063921,0.00018742119,0.0027342003,0.07261991,0.0008734022,0.8898132,0.014056851,0.000024180785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003984686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003086348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005423251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002058486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024845484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028681219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095875266","doi":"10.1002/iir.158","title":"Comparing empirical results of transaction avoidance rules studies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Database transaction; Shadow (psychology); Suspect; Empirical research; Business; Transaction data; Transaction cost; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Economics; Law; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Finance; Database; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.21831068314464602,"score_gpt":0.3347377807867344,"score_spread":0.11642709764208836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095875266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92695,0.013295841,0.005282805,0.0018526792,0.00013914448,0.0002054744,0.0020297668,0.000041317493,0.050203025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957651,0.0011557224,0.0006005901,0.00012090366,0.000057632977,0.000058850954,0.0015204322,0.000019557574,0.00070117123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.933906,0.03564994,0.008357885,0.004835872,0.015467768,0.0017824806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3492843,0.543474,0.047326643,0.02006789,0.037181642,0.002665604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046204917,0.00035686602,0.0010007446,0.015423669,0.0008632965,0.007185622,0.001998907,0.0013401966,0.007770088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31447983,0.00028792047,0.0008416212,0.017162168,0.003465048,0.0043949853,0.0035705564,0.0013003332,0.00094487565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096998335,0.00047862943,0.83652383,0.001737817,0.0018892324,0.00078639603,0.01187293,0.0029926184,0.0003707376,0.065697506,0.004929638,0.071750715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021978887,0.00077033933,0.88102436,0.002011037,0.0013293856,0.0009662671,0.031636834,0.009437684,0.0018695928,0.03855469,0.03206405,0.00011592724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029885706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023804314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046204917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023675773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013996683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24435782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096624227","doi":"10.1017/s0266267104001294","title":"CRITICAL NOTICE TOO MUCH INVESTED TO QUIT","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economics and Philosophy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coase theorem; Tort; Notice; Liability; Transaction cost; Law; Economics; Social cost; Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Incentive; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Neoclassical economics; Epistemology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04224492396447365,"score_gpt":0.2296779656402668,"score_spread":0.18743304167579314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096624227","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000247002,0.0117935585,0.00075623847,0.82825,0.1329578,0.000022657478,0.00012797012,0.00016737187,0.025677409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0066671045,0.00601347,0.001014044,0.7572229,0.07087012,0.00008940645,0.00015609204,0.00042567044,0.15754123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99152035,0.0022058242,0.0003331526,0.0016325921,0.0033133153,0.0009947361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790633,0.007227394,0.00053343934,0.0021021396,0.00794434,0.003129369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008339843,0.0015079754,0.0014668292,0.0018344842,0.006844306,0.010765605,0.0037644014,0.013713184,0.048751913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04443141,0.00044448755,0.0011675962,0.00082259567,0.010380572,0.017657468,0.007603228,0.03352467,0.029944092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012005181,0.000015659321,0.00004975065,0.000046073437,0.0000033028107,0.000042555243,0.00034041159,0.000016124863,0.000058072288,0.03467426,0.9574668,0.007275025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039634215,0.000006070362,0.000052061416,0.00016150616,0.0000018905893,0.000043418993,0.00057000056,0.000024967076,0.00004283918,0.011260881,0.98782325,0.0000091836655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060993796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008680149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048751913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006383468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008683109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16309142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096843893","doi":"10.1093/forestscience/52.4.451","title":"Transaction Evidence Appraisal: Competition in British Columbia's Stumpage Markets","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Stumpage; Competition (biology); Database transaction; Business; Economics; Agricultural economics; Database; Ecology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.021331389008670654,"score_gpt":0.22239820275978872,"score_spread":0.20106681375111807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096843893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80577993,0.006634311,0.0035308967,0.040463768,0.00025905677,0.00020526093,0.0030019877,0.00007604505,0.1400488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815825,0.0011110726,0.0011802146,0.000919718,0.00006979019,0.000018736435,0.00046091276,0.000019355064,0.01463766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971564,0.0007654468,0.00018642713,0.00020644498,0.0012622299,0.00042308448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93662435,0.03740822,0.002991302,0.0013381566,0.019744176,0.0018938013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073148515,0.00024314172,0.00048333418,0.0053205765,0.003399994,0.0073083867,0.0016529103,0.0018931869,0.015444551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07102001,0.00020028866,0.00021715503,0.006046714,0.0024507935,0.0026286358,0.0012538807,0.002259956,0.00043140442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015827682,0.00025038703,0.24974784,0.000954926,0.00034571163,0.002752694,0.009883494,0.014979965,0.0012106975,0.25519738,0.22242714,0.24066706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041395528,0.00026267843,0.51612115,0.0019183091,0.0008623583,0.0004934817,0.039323095,0.07881675,0.0034093517,0.16100916,0.19703262,0.0003370578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80700195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92414474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19299805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019901458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028827209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3882693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097041083","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.466442","title":"Should Courts Always Enforce What Contracting Parties Write?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.0323315179240222,"score_gpt":0.22861323986515486,"score_spread":0.19628172194113266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097041083","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09248417,0.0039340016,0.07978701,0.50162184,0.003676201,0.0004740587,0.0003045307,0.00051544193,0.31720278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7906307,0.0013741117,0.026660757,0.14180884,0.0027817658,0.0005351138,0.00013006596,0.00040585446,0.03567275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9406489,0.026091475,0.0046720337,0.0072033606,0.0121842995,0.009199898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78982854,0.11981515,0.020074075,0.028083323,0.033152808,0.009046101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06784885,0.00055451953,0.001736321,0.0013857874,0.01031063,0.01565502,0.0039057825,0.020815795,0.0085508935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25557932,0.0015151788,0.0008506666,0.0016690904,0.013953578,0.017531866,0.0041586743,0.020330729,0.0037866698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011597787,0.0002751498,0.008418793,0.00019906169,0.00013464231,0.00024837238,0.0076795314,0.0008827056,0.0016430636,0.8401254,0.07862282,0.061654516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017767618,0.00005401219,0.006075836,0.00058833114,0.0000990668,0.00016247643,0.005629837,0.0025370826,0.0028302728,0.8850675,0.09662818,0.00014969915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009847405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014468555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06784885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042395373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015652662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3588233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098906945","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1984915","title":"Scaffolding: Using Formal Contracts to Build Informal Relations to Support Innovation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scaffold; Business; Knowledge management; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.030790247695963325,"score_gpt":0.24711796107176845,"score_spread":0.21632771337580511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098906945","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1899322,0.00038149906,0.7294021,0.004195944,0.00041280186,0.00044817766,0.00034964347,0.0056601986,0.0692174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88248587,0.00014615203,0.11034513,0.00020469447,0.00009086607,0.00026709033,0.00021304618,0.00033213393,0.005914982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99486464,0.002806195,0.0003091683,0.0008153482,0.00067055627,0.0005341017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9441457,0.027343804,0.004579011,0.018423628,0.002255227,0.0032526876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008142509,0.0007740116,0.0006022184,0.0017884423,0.0032008474,0.005896631,0.0026639008,0.002957013,0.019161385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054526858,0.00063545676,0.0009042688,0.0019444551,0.004441564,0.012904938,0.008133832,0.0024766945,0.0030767734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005052899,0.0007721821,0.0076984456,0.000253575,0.00006690649,0.0006150401,0.007961196,0.018509606,0.0065051815,0.742951,0.010711314,0.2034503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003403198,0.00035950798,0.0019451783,0.00017021809,0.00008468136,0.00022662686,0.0018526784,0.10048714,0.004697627,0.8421186,0.047601584,0.00011575386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026706618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026654075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019161385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012626685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036992428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06410116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099262308","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1722275","title":"'While There's a Breath in My Body': The Systemic Effects of Politically Motivated Retirement from the Supreme Court","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Systemic risk; Law; Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Financial crisis; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.009214970135860945,"score_gpt":0.195154418716045,"score_spread":0.18593944858018405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099262308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89813566,0.0018928965,0.0007332305,0.075559154,0.00019117458,0.000021200152,0.00046667206,0.000030386123,0.022969497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950899,0.00038383523,0.000045862977,0.00196282,0.00015154145,0.0000057224693,0.000048100857,0.000008916724,0.002303331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992411,0.00034075038,0.000018136025,0.000081752136,0.00007288889,0.00024534803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903655,0.0052903853,0.002175042,0.00030899915,0.0005424506,0.001317614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027354509,0.00014112375,0.00044495898,0.00051360804,0.0019505955,0.0032351776,0.00069536926,0.0036989825,0.012519989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016524488,0.0002147286,0.00032292193,0.0009861012,0.002917615,0.0026894957,0.001950914,0.00458547,0.0005456382],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029025637,0.0022465514,0.36187062,0.0002373688,0.00049246236,0.0025541207,0.012888511,0.011294395,0.0024663075,0.43222967,0.08793026,0.082887195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005008598,0.0006027245,0.59209675,0.00017601831,0.0003706937,0.00023819343,0.017266637,0.007235888,0.00088986056,0.3514535,0.029038932,0.00012996352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021188293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049507227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021188293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022723156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025959811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042129934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100932632","doi":"10.1628/0932456032975087","title":"Enforcing Contracts: Should Courts Seek the Truth?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Business; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.022653200107467276,"score_gpt":0.2110080005931114,"score_spread":0.18835480048564412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100932632","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1642535,0.005239609,0.22262923,0.3515984,0.0007119629,0.00020621842,0.00030247084,0.00018726829,0.25487137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694808,0.0017572539,0.016989185,0.0051967963,0.000625956,0.00010897565,0.000051392082,0.000047391586,0.0057422603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98883283,0.0063327793,0.00044653672,0.0009915258,0.0019064329,0.0014899499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9625962,0.025863728,0.0043336656,0.0037533445,0.002318138,0.001134838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017469293,0.0005264221,0.0011938473,0.0013473115,0.0036203125,0.011135247,0.0026138371,0.017216835,0.007859067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059152346,0.00078573555,0.0009591148,0.0016989333,0.016853137,0.020527598,0.004121298,0.0077229976,0.0011593949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008781454,0.000013257843,0.00017756417,0.000016678836,0.0000056697604,0.00003555126,0.00039589574,0.0011329134,0.000064521235,0.995235,0.00078218634,0.002131889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013561472,0.0000052033974,0.00005406801,0.000025047319,0.000003171846,0.000013458643,0.00015043648,0.002438251,0.00003960475,0.99522495,0.0020273281,0.000004857705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029402296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002559326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017469293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042150714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00471515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0923875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104060690","doi":"10.1111/jori.12043","title":"On Lawsuits, Corporate Governance, and Directors' and Officers' Liability Insurance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Risk & Insurance","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Opportunism; Business; Lawsuit; Litigation risk analysis; Liability insurance; Moral hazard; Actuarial science; Liability; Shareholder; Reinsurance; Quality (philosophy); Information asymmetry; Accounting; Finance; Economics; Law; Incentive; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.015075851083309708,"score_gpt":0.19310172146045104,"score_spread":0.17802587037714135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104060690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943157,0.00028723275,0.00026886616,0.00061557017,0.0000039845586,0.000012370225,0.00026006866,0.0000044965673,0.004231674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999361,0.0000981997,0.000041809286,0.000031229163,0.000012615255,0.0000023700131,0.00011989722,7.261703e-7,0.00033228798],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739385,0.0007112334,0.00021527128,0.00026293215,0.00081430713,0.00060230953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8399884,0.063316226,0.08417493,0.0024839302,0.004284853,0.0057517057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043019587,0.00016670761,0.00040439572,0.0020779744,0.000634175,0.0020162745,0.0005174194,0.0009043352,0.005799466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044994596,0.0001787617,0.0003442639,0.0022085612,0.0014461123,0.0012836881,0.0009803791,0.0010696321,0.00033773543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034457287,0.0000913059,0.9951094,0.000008292398,0.00003558639,0.00007088242,0.00025416166,0.00060079014,0.00004902003,0.0006949162,0.00021644995,0.0028346563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004549466,0.00005051396,0.9960104,0.00002078398,0.000030580788,0.00005900715,0.00049594534,0.0017551393,0.00007426701,0.0010470904,0.00044258358,0.000009135228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08637067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.118146144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08637067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021193873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017926705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17173588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105211254","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2009.00074.x","title":"Liability insurance under the negligence rule","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Liability; Strict liability; Harm; Contributory negligence; Damages; Actuarial science; Contractible space; Business; Liability insurance; Incentive; Economics; Tort; Law and economics; Insurance policy; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.03342304927442657,"score_gpt":0.21895249723619045,"score_spread":0.18552944796176388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105211254","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22000043,0.0022771962,0.6491786,0.010700542,0.00038842653,0.000112555565,0.00027287757,0.0001891845,0.11688014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784768,0.0005108899,0.014445999,0.0004449636,0.00034330782,0.00005045487,0.000044246546,0.000015559783,0.005667689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911204,0.0020321307,0.00062482257,0.0011241938,0.004145667,0.00095287967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98484516,0.0077995635,0.0027032392,0.0026433447,0.0014838764,0.00052483927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007789365,0.00045883507,0.0007829432,0.001120895,0.001037732,0.0029369744,0.0012093224,0.002920127,0.0021826394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029950859,0.00035531732,0.0010503503,0.0006575042,0.0047415644,0.0042147194,0.0031432004,0.003083465,0.0003925932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011795887,0.000017938102,0.00071558263,0.000018177716,0.000015094394,0.00012754864,0.000097211996,0.007039741,0.00022875181,0.98494315,0.00055601035,0.00622909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015389774,0.000027659278,0.00067110464,0.000024158326,0.000013937488,0.00013578314,0.00002023457,0.01978138,0.00029051086,0.9773801,0.0016274938,0.000012361421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013066268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061197573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007789365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015785617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019655526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04119456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105861237","doi":"10.7202/1018431ar","title":"La responsabilité environnementale des prêteurs : difficultés juridiques et ensemble des possibles","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047374558616022334,"score_gpt":0.241687560073221,"score_spread":0.19431300145719868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105861237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3125838,0.014179749,0.067045845,0.07907815,0.00073800795,0.00017611818,0.00031165563,0.0001516827,0.52573496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96096206,0.0017541344,0.0044356966,0.0011676017,0.00032608747,0.0000681866,0.00005566417,0.000041749823,0.031188691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9803278,0.007192344,0.0009618877,0.0031684365,0.0059879497,0.002361535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97240067,0.013926498,0.004295081,0.0024478154,0.004943301,0.001986712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021357434,0.00047061348,0.000751846,0.003046592,0.011738116,0.014728358,0.0022035649,0.00528054,0.01266061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06542189,0.0006376213,0.0005978229,0.0019261084,0.01258269,0.009227845,0.005700399,0.0051258733,0.0014821205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004048904,0.00002882747,0.0088047795,0.00007413233,0.00002730757,0.0002517207,0.008058207,0.0010919528,0.00030330115,0.9523829,0.003155838,0.025780499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003826632,0.00010954608,0.03223139,0.00068259495,0.00007031874,0.00076280674,0.018715736,0.0029933096,0.0016895371,0.78733665,0.15522693,0.00014294288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02079063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02234108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021357434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007399382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01203806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112950265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108102919","doi":"10.7202/043880ar","title":"Le raisonnement judiciaire fondé sur l’équité dans les conflits entre actionnaires de petites sociétés : l’éclairage d’une approche consensuelle","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020299792513421698,"score_gpt":0.22266975443644765,"score_spread":0.20236996192302595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108102919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06675154,0.029787585,0.04449918,0.26269263,0.0030633954,0.00009805585,0.00007714672,0.0001060815,0.5929244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90264183,0.0069165383,0.0090798335,0.021771733,0.001151472,0.00011870206,0.000041509298,0.00014284175,0.05813557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760485,0.015974762,0.0006868632,0.0023775722,0.0034211488,0.0014911552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98508286,0.008422243,0.0013176063,0.0013050268,0.0026024235,0.0012699688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014259469,0.0008881637,0.0007429556,0.002308737,0.014363744,0.016563566,0.0025419053,0.009261155,0.00793406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015456367,0.00050080323,0.0006918803,0.002253842,0.042996854,0.010535064,0.0068307417,0.011551255,0.0014673546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020683698,0.000023715515,0.0012551522,0.000097706834,0.000014315351,0.00021002098,0.048169512,0.0001713677,0.00021180652,0.9282018,0.0060641672,0.015559773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026354415,0.00007517318,0.0048343143,0.0013848296,0.000037246158,0.00048278162,0.05026103,0.0008565346,0.00062705885,0.47305545,0.4682745,0.00008479859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030071862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052449774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030071862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013653972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016450638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09906697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109085707","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-4932.2009.00616.x","title":"Police Powers, Regulatory Takings and the Efficient Compensation of Domestic and Foreign Investors*","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Record","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Subsidy; Investment (military); Business; Government (linguistics); Economics; Law and economics; Industrial organization; Market economy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01694825536567501,"score_gpt":0.2089053116074703,"score_spread":0.1919570562417953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109085707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47516292,0.0025288109,0.11373344,0.023059608,0.00034916712,0.00031268914,0.00022219519,0.00016079005,0.3844704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98734415,0.00033060228,0.0028886327,0.0007871135,0.00011779132,0.00006184783,0.00002135831,0.000011260793,0.008437223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535877,0.0012828019,0.0003071504,0.0006290059,0.0010515173,0.0013707114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854688,0.0055013453,0.005527741,0.0016554386,0.0011615705,0.0006850385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006961659,0.0003074431,0.0006511137,0.0010706221,0.0025420722,0.006484428,0.00092351664,0.003630173,0.0078007346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01857781,0.00045195705,0.00053747103,0.00070516893,0.006595378,0.0035944735,0.0022021888,0.0028807414,0.0006229452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029186991,0.00003285922,0.0023155836,0.00002446426,0.000015252799,0.000105273226,0.0003385721,0.0025204264,0.00044749756,0.98177963,0.002011464,0.010379731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013235917,0.000083840096,0.0069199787,0.000125141,0.000068519126,0.00019575468,0.0009787693,0.011656586,0.0026403093,0.9492296,0.027911615,0.00005741696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006024107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061934977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078007346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025474632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004117204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036817193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109355614","doi":"10.1086/596562","title":"Experimental Tests of Core Theory and the Coase Theorem: Inefficiency and Cycling","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coase theorem; Inefficiency; Core (optical fiber); Property rights; Economics; Transaction cost; Property (philosophy); Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Conjecture; Pareto efficiency; Pareto principle; Mathematics; Computer science; Operations management","score_opus":0.02600796977939456,"score_gpt":0.23376107464527496,"score_spread":0.2077531048658804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109355614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97912097,0.000080052334,0.008324189,0.00035211406,0.000026432492,0.00018671145,0.00010095061,0.000027273161,0.011781394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948671,0.000061581755,0.0032778364,0.00012676154,0.0000131013885,0.00029840838,0.00008713498,0.00002093516,0.00124719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99456584,0.0030070066,0.0003471092,0.0006976524,0.000966557,0.00041582438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90098643,0.07809211,0.0068185944,0.0108965505,0.0018351316,0.0013711678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009123926,0.0005340684,0.0007685302,0.0007447291,0.0011373921,0.0018339055,0.0015700997,0.0015821214,0.009945946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049981162,0.00038532016,0.00046390007,0.00073916675,0.0030797059,0.0034111398,0.0019426717,0.0024129406,0.00062337046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0141108185,0.031134075,0.052532762,0.0012938827,0.0006069554,0.00086780364,0.009163757,0.06743075,0.08113386,0.6352543,0.0057955296,0.10067566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040114606,0.019375537,0.04154509,0.0003214843,0.00027352668,0.0006622279,0.0065317107,0.23162466,0.0635787,0.62278146,0.009054004,0.00024020081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052949385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005052138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009945946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011895507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010020579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048252463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111199343","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2004.00022.x","title":"Disappearing Trials? A Comparative Perspective","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Perspective (graphical); Incidence (geometry); Geography; Period (music); Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.27536854473739786,"score_gpt":0.39585725643722913,"score_spread":0.12048871169983127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111199343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3302506,0.038858876,0.002006175,0.05885778,0.0005854488,0.0000406677,0.00082637684,0.000028516108,0.56854564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96529114,0.01265074,0.000531915,0.002928676,0.00046662398,0.000023611161,0.0002932495,0.000027145767,0.017786916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613047,0.0014924523,0.0002088814,0.0004998229,0.00070589443,0.0009625246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816458,0.0073271696,0.0028039056,0.0013673853,0.0045611574,0.002294531],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004320897,0.0001286191,0.0007135971,0.0048141847,0.0025671255,0.0068308874,0.0014627499,0.0014182951,0.012557306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01963994,0.00016535183,0.00025365528,0.007834618,0.00987446,0.0058887177,0.0020035878,0.001836185,0.00048290772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017914482,0.000067041256,0.032648392,0.0004932705,0.000035634555,0.0007305432,0.028123872,0.0004752414,0.0003678075,0.8115012,0.019012613,0.10636526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006257997,0.00022302654,0.29986644,0.0010102151,0.000082591636,0.0015475036,0.08438252,0.0008136008,0.00032157532,0.1121354,0.49949488,0.00005965151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13138972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19190346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076361806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005269936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2612499},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112180831","doi":"10.5539/ass.v10n7p38","title":"Investigation of Defects of Article 264 of Iranian Civil Code","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia","keywords":"Obligation; Legislator; Civil code; Categorization; Code (set theory); Law; Political science; Sharia; Computer science; Business; Set (abstract data type); Islam; Legislation; Philosophy; Programming language; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.028067993307388878,"score_gpt":0.21749793590899089,"score_spread":0.189429942601602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112180831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91926515,0.00065179897,0.003181541,0.0028270767,0.00031880135,0.0005081311,0.0028196143,0.00022408177,0.07020376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781601,0.00046636123,0.0024491202,0.00050854665,0.0000996435,0.00021476066,0.001877109,0.00012996074,0.016094452],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854344,0.0015975611,0.0009984742,0.0010872872,0.009985499,0.0008967241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8651933,0.051371615,0.024397304,0.007691369,0.050252244,0.0010940701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011546187,0.00021965703,0.00035628147,0.010901669,0.0017160551,0.0024721303,0.0014021131,0.00088537246,0.0048819855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09303068,0.00027677126,0.00027157608,0.009735097,0.0025830937,0.0019137174,0.0010607206,0.0013318139,0.0011979601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066913536,0.00052349915,0.4528588,0.0011744295,0.00008864953,0.0051703346,0.066043384,0.001483553,0.004760676,0.1125724,0.06442077,0.29023433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004255621,0.000550707,0.7026137,0.0008837189,0.00020394455,0.0025829058,0.052018777,0.007244905,0.011776388,0.008762487,0.21315412,0.00016572875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032625627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022260817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032625627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046889205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007715382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06487143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112571425","doi":"10.7202/013890ar","title":"Le critère d’absence d’envie dans les théories contemporaines de la justice1","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.07508379310017149,"score_gpt":0.2714929565344538,"score_spread":0.19640916343428233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112571425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069329366,0.016412944,0.4081094,0.036726598,0.0016116262,0.00014127712,0.0003907019,0.00009363272,0.46718445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8750538,0.0058469246,0.08239127,0.0029791829,0.00144652,0.00048125128,0.00028375004,0.00019483114,0.031322423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97700423,0.010546891,0.001392631,0.003451874,0.0064295838,0.0011748438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97678655,0.0140962815,0.001826222,0.0027542503,0.0038075314,0.0007290228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018103955,0.0010086587,0.0017274661,0.0034245295,0.006602179,0.010117935,0.00304665,0.0054098624,0.005961255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04017112,0.0009396229,0.0014216752,0.0038234282,0.031178467,0.016886946,0.0062503302,0.009726666,0.0012157671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072781822,0.000004418838,0.00013901947,0.000021748065,0.000005147315,0.000015631651,0.00028853037,0.00038335886,0.000026897387,0.9970937,0.0003104212,0.0017038586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007791913,0.000011379738,0.00022552615,0.000077556055,0.000007268107,0.000046016834,0.0002273364,0.0010495675,0.00011982563,0.98675275,0.011459178,0.00001579712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005475874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054977313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018103955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072253104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054567433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095744014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113898040","doi":"10.1257/aer.97.5.1994","title":"Overconfidence, Insurance, and Paternalism","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Overconfidence effect; Paternalism; Rothschild; Insurance policy; Economic interventionism; Government (linguistics); Intervention (counseling); Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Public economics; Law; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.02237627356343686,"score_gpt":0.24555641753621965,"score_spread":0.2231801439727828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113898040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8481995,0.0052252132,0.009107565,0.022324694,0.00015082952,0.000031886837,0.00025983702,0.000018580457,0.114681825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971758,0.00088600564,0.00020610887,0.0004022684,0.00006046653,0.000003002363,0.000020402016,0.0000015798394,0.0012443851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982135,0.0008916651,0.00009036254,0.00019744919,0.0003812319,0.00022585195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95160604,0.028810257,0.0145372385,0.0014023817,0.0018755341,0.0017685737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055521703,0.00013164873,0.00028883686,0.0007022848,0.00069043983,0.0018613525,0.00036899187,0.0008867165,0.009504136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034762472,0.00015387431,0.00013133201,0.0007705644,0.0024092968,0.0010581142,0.0009402233,0.0013511003,0.00029102303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062147074,0.0003344641,0.3339553,0.00024836874,0.00018093127,0.0009959242,0.0020421636,0.0053283637,0.00069716945,0.54047877,0.010850701,0.10426647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018398679,0.00022730023,0.2355809,0.00018771658,0.0000961161,0.0013705592,0.0020286317,0.009106727,0.0003891451,0.7348032,0.015979538,0.000046236175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029797095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033577448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009504136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011446336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007265814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03179449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114215498","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.453940","title":"On the Redistributive Impact of Privatizing a Resource under Imperfect Enforcement","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Imperfect; Enforcement; Economics; Natural resource economics; Resource (disambiguation); Business; Public economics; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.01843260990405759,"score_gpt":0.22680332552782642,"score_spread":0.20837071562376883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114215498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63720095,0.0030550642,0.02180813,0.041648388,0.00048852625,0.00024241654,0.00093071576,0.00012510052,0.29450068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98934096,0.0010083377,0.00070792134,0.00090841186,0.0003739424,0.000035503643,0.00004032685,0.000019443836,0.0075651626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595547,0.001993658,0.00014272578,0.00034318864,0.00043750418,0.0011275157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9427691,0.048230737,0.0041969707,0.0018442676,0.0017832287,0.0011756592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009233213,0.000642892,0.0017887836,0.0021235957,0.0022405942,0.0044426583,0.0020154084,0.0042074667,0.03181467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034870584,0.00045571692,0.00088584,0.0025638016,0.0071149343,0.004894652,0.0025862653,0.0036649099,0.0007339001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013383046,0.0005458418,0.007815271,0.0002644939,0.00017636373,0.0006319027,0.0004802108,0.056766372,0.00086282194,0.8985901,0.0095430985,0.022985224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037226122,0.0003409581,0.009281028,0.00011458488,0.00026428356,0.00015605793,0.0012600841,0.052122705,0.0006111494,0.930018,0.0053922823,0.000066566936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015556298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012207551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03181467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043354896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037116848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10643065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115408093","doi":"10.7202/000029ar","title":"Reasonable Notice for Wrongful Dismissal","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Severance; Notice; Economic Justice; Business; Human resource policies; Human resources; Compensation (psychology); Labour economics; Law; Actuarial science; Public relations; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05662896481344449,"score_gpt":0.21283341676171316,"score_spread":0.15620445194826868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115408093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95335513,0.0012663931,0.0044980403,0.0064772977,0.0002674686,0.0001304687,0.0004153458,0.00019545665,0.03339446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975101,0.000121176876,0.00040884447,0.00026649167,0.00008845399,0.0000117648815,0.00008230968,0.000009673809,0.0015012138],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896242,0.0023068034,0.0015231438,0.00081537466,0.0039522904,0.0017782095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8659386,0.053984016,0.061142173,0.0048216274,0.007107707,0.007005892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006266686,0.00018106315,0.00036132784,0.0029282004,0.0020888427,0.0022349695,0.0008658638,0.0022530635,0.015335078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11463556,0.00027155122,0.0005339432,0.0008678342,0.001164899,0.0016080836,0.002095883,0.0021631184,0.0020581402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011013101,0.0011430476,0.7658984,0.0002534378,0.00017312255,0.007764789,0.005928953,0.0029613911,0.0041552563,0.041241955,0.020486368,0.14889196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010110174,0.0006158157,0.9303659,0.00023833495,0.00009607972,0.0061176624,0.007527796,0.0043337205,0.0013339901,0.020493658,0.02861711,0.00015883996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005252407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008788495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015335078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001652218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026727987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051300943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115612433","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9779.2012.01563.x","title":"<scp>Amakudari: The Post‐Retirement Employment of Elite Bureaucrats in Japan</scp>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Collusion; Elite; Government (linguistics); Economics; Business; Process (computing); Labour economics; Market economy; Law and economics; Industrial organization; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.0363564012537214,"score_gpt":0.23603036173047265,"score_spread":0.19967396047675123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115612433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99188554,0.0004443586,0.000107239066,0.0019967505,0.000018685576,0.000007122258,0.00008028994,0.0000022741015,0.0054578385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706477,0.0002577701,0.000054229626,0.00025822996,0.000024811397,0.0000057871416,0.000058572605,0.0000019072068,0.0022739456],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995166,0.00006733212,0.000028238317,0.00004355289,0.000077461256,0.00026680957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977603,0.00022763631,0.0012186081,0.000057836638,0.00026454972,0.00047108854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012314691,0.00008331526,0.00020246641,0.0011303638,0.0028395609,0.0019064859,0.00030839394,0.00059655815,0.0030656746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016900533,0.00009572996,0.00014635645,0.0018913713,0.0014383435,0.0008919589,0.001419764,0.00075330073,0.0002661917],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017352635,0.00022072773,0.87639165,0.000137668,0.000024773446,0.003127288,0.04963419,0.00045216057,0.00094649784,0.01737983,0.013791835,0.037719842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008648643,0.00006441058,0.9499879,0.000072433955,0.000016203932,0.00021279659,0.03446989,0.00062086026,0.00020114385,0.0011632319,0.01316286,0.000019591396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07365245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13119042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07365245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027897723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023153035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14644748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115802741","doi":"","title":"Production Technology, Information Technology, and Vertical Integration Under Asymmetric Information","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit documents and data repository (Érudit Consortium, University of Montreal)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Technological change; Industrial organization; Transaction cost; Procurement; Production (economics); Vertical integration; Moral hazard; Business; Agency (philosophy); Information technology; Economics; Information asymmetry; Microeconomics; Marketing; Incentive; Computer science","score_opus":0.014081326702052333,"score_gpt":0.18681853797823209,"score_spread":0.17273721127617975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115802741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89906836,0.0017944945,0.036047697,0.001716545,0.00004423472,0.00011288172,0.00017812435,0.00006371671,0.060973965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99444854,0.0004970715,0.0016845623,0.00005855004,0.000021786482,0.00003305523,0.000043585827,0.00000803524,0.0032047397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779284,0.000619496,0.00009072434,0.00024343267,0.0006714498,0.00058199815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98076093,0.011890311,0.0046986006,0.00081859477,0.0010771112,0.0007544467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030389403,0.0007218111,0.00074072334,0.0018229141,0.001211408,0.0046369596,0.0007559702,0.0014774624,0.011404111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014564445,0.00031945965,0.00085432763,0.0025821775,0.0023129983,0.006392717,0.0031299281,0.0016519758,0.00045483312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012571809,0.00078649336,0.09030369,0.00043247052,0.00029282074,0.001157606,0.00259874,0.2070931,0.0075610406,0.5642226,0.0013127062,0.12298157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025518975,0.0012358732,0.16598688,0.00032530658,0.00043745176,0.00037984617,0.007160275,0.25119713,0.006455772,0.5545013,0.011934764,0.00013011487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007093395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039341887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011404111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038624534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001679805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03815049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116161255","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.07.002","title":"Crime, punishment, and prejudice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Prejudice (legal term); Punishment (psychology); Population; Ex-ante; Criminology; Economics; Schedule; Psychology; Actuarial science; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Demography","score_opus":0.06435809056592644,"score_gpt":0.219202532371983,"score_spread":0.15484444180605655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116161255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93206096,0.0066044177,0.0008552087,0.019748505,0.00016767479,0.000027054039,0.00023437434,0.000010319693,0.04029159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972384,0.0010135218,0.000065045126,0.0002506638,0.00010465468,0.0000068741742,0.000038271763,0.0000018195163,0.0012807955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849164,0.0007813596,0.000074652016,0.000103942,0.00026018717,0.00028824387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696758,0.019161915,0.006134553,0.0008661867,0.0015057287,0.0026557534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031834275,0.0003170868,0.00064997165,0.0015678171,0.0018637921,0.003527313,0.0006289579,0.0029812737,0.0077525065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023413217,0.00030291738,0.00034090402,0.0019676117,0.0037233445,0.0019818293,0.0015466852,0.0030140164,0.00040494156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044369668,0.0020945594,0.8172317,0.00011793683,0.0003179042,0.0006093434,0.0025603918,0.0069023264,0.00010965948,0.12082688,0.013363401,0.035422146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083437844,0.00025771206,0.75523525,0.00018280395,0.00021337853,0.0005683472,0.007132667,0.009096219,0.0000972143,0.21962678,0.0074388874,0.0000671925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012673049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020251894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012673049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013487424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022317881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025934696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117706279","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.963188","title":"Accuracy versus Falsification Costs: The Optimal Amount of Evidence under Different Procedures","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Operations management; Business; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Economics","score_opus":0.06275006985974235,"score_gpt":0.28103813536206507,"score_spread":0.21828806550232271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117706279","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44060716,0.0066344426,0.48744497,0.031939603,0.0005052243,0.0014391287,0.001071843,0.0007121279,0.0296455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9124289,0.0010306227,0.08302432,0.00096933806,0.0008646627,0.00038476282,0.00014697561,0.000095254545,0.0010551644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.88645256,0.071404114,0.011867934,0.0114376275,0.01310606,0.0057317247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1358491,0.8073914,0.022435376,0.024430897,0.0067846854,0.0031085492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14289175,0.0022308943,0.00615282,0.007607269,0.0019121771,0.013982527,0.0065548685,0.015977921,0.0052010273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5501981,0.002701256,0.0024873954,0.0035264418,0.013662733,0.028574312,0.0073246504,0.008114386,0.00067995983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008893825,0.00136813,0.017689243,0.0016912905,0.0018391283,0.0011208804,0.0012958718,0.15268624,0.005426454,0.60292816,0.0029950065,0.20206572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096212694,0.00082461425,0.006262393,0.00037464776,0.00072265434,0.0005243813,0.0003609714,0.110846356,0.003837855,0.8738739,0.0012362364,0.00017384956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008403851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006815747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14289175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003975771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048722816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75569284},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2118224539","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.556163","title":"Information and Externalities in Sequential Litigation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.012095400300574634,"score_gpt":0.19912808863721737,"score_spread":0.18703268833664274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118224539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8701584,0.0018568466,0.05153841,0.017489133,0.0001208277,0.00014959254,0.0007641555,0.0002353513,0.057687305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897356,0.0008930005,0.0011554931,0.00024442445,0.00022035185,0.000039232902,0.000114008704,0.000025572659,0.0075722127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963476,0.001591745,0.00027279425,0.00045582344,0.00052477216,0.00080732355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84015554,0.13255739,0.01755721,0.003195667,0.003075672,0.0034584864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008629426,0.00058418844,0.0019756812,0.0029276016,0.0019286512,0.00607278,0.0013580332,0.0046572997,0.021753259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061495304,0.0010581193,0.0010409014,0.0035285451,0.0050736135,0.012877403,0.0030907423,0.0043798573,0.0008823868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073481,0.0005704297,0.018583069,0.0001688927,0.00014145549,0.0012201455,0.0010882908,0.08258505,0.00051922794,0.8744326,0.0040823733,0.01587359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014041546,0.00011567512,0.005848067,0.000039089547,0.00007478368,0.000201482,0.00028859256,0.048009392,0.00014953835,0.944149,0.00094204687,0.000041870546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068398314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070359637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021753259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037501191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025929923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07277185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119840776","doi":"","title":"A Legal Ethics Perspective on Alternative Litigation Financing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Plaintiff; Legal ethics; Law; Context (archaeology); Professional responsibility; Political science; Law and economics; Agency (philosophy); Professional conduct; Tort; Business; Liability; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.021953502405493208,"score_gpt":0.24466941037815326,"score_spread":0.22271590797266005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119840776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0114327585,0.0064532435,0.038835954,0.15169008,0.00071551226,0.00009549672,0.00010042666,0.000046927707,0.7906296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83551484,0.0063585374,0.014587501,0.039884042,0.0047155675,0.0004825101,0.00010047627,0.000102937796,0.09825354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9840095,0.007409821,0.00046812193,0.001372255,0.0048216204,0.0019187077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879291,0.008207609,0.0008444577,0.0008679013,0.0013784715,0.0007724071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01037097,0.0006386248,0.00050439313,0.002471546,0.006165803,0.013464702,0.0027751036,0.018918196,0.01104397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014233556,0.00043891373,0.001049689,0.0015421368,0.036542993,0.012894676,0.0054652686,0.01158323,0.0014894337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.164395e-7,0.000004019074,0.000022503858,0.0000036363574,6.385778e-7,0.000024596884,0.0002036451,0.000065193075,0.000007947907,0.9984339,0.00071739504,0.00051572133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011835355,0.000008651105,0.00006466782,0.0000799733,0.0000034308339,0.00009577523,0.00039556954,0.0007281506,0.00005515198,0.95429605,0.044253383,0.000007258941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007054554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004793695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018918196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01268436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009892957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092031896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121251908","doi":"10.2308/aud.2002.21.1.79","title":"An Experimental Investigation of the Efficacy of Lawyers' Letters","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Pacific Railway (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Privilege (computing); Accrual; Damages; Accounting; Business; Psychology; Litigation risk analysis; Law; Actuarial science; Political science; Earnings","score_opus":0.030623797008785352,"score_gpt":0.24240333323780963,"score_spread":0.2117795362290243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121251908","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99739134,0.00003174744,0.000767165,0.00015843759,0.000031180305,0.00016809361,0.000018274992,0.000013022453,0.0014207043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995083,0.000052502528,0.0030438153,0.00024654312,0.000046236386,0.0004024977,0.00002472975,0.0000061314126,0.0010945316],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.987069,0.008165692,0.0011236203,0.0011870886,0.0019998576,0.0004546613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.770534,0.18733393,0.026212469,0.011430911,0.0022740744,0.0022145445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009334391,0.0004612786,0.0006244117,0.0003317834,0.0005789649,0.0015751934,0.0009615921,0.0016974725,0.004739555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10473301,0.00056955166,0.00028013298,0.0002520985,0.0014163873,0.001201215,0.0009201365,0.001747231,0.0006032926],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.09526782,0.2463451,0.10840754,0.0021777183,0.00071966794,0.0014148153,0.027891725,0.007217695,0.29639435,0.01649708,0.0026217932,0.19504465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.028672922,0.4504705,0.2757485,0.0006106283,0.0008792275,0.00186178,0.00975563,0.04030914,0.14590646,0.026631637,0.018620456,0.0005331528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002288564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019842037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009334391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039430073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057377625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04936552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121655900","doi":"10.1111/irj.12101","title":"The right‐to‐manage default rule","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Relations Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Default; Default rule; Process (computing); Business; Actuarial science; Computer science; Law and economics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.09454972175180688,"score_gpt":0.24963905952639232,"score_spread":0.15508933777458545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121655900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15495013,0.0016538338,0.25123048,0.0630255,0.0009631366,0.00033093937,0.00041758097,0.00031211742,0.52711636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700402,0.000279587,0.014576449,0.0027145655,0.0004643669,0.000114298324,0.000047228023,0.000044748896,0.011718533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99008125,0.0029015648,0.0008346018,0.0015416717,0.0035316637,0.0011092586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98173976,0.008578395,0.0013464277,0.003836329,0.003611012,0.0008880128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016578361,0.00027990472,0.00096814655,0.0012965298,0.0022239455,0.0063479715,0.0024800638,0.0055334643,0.0071396856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03810812,0.0003339712,0.00081293157,0.00058742677,0.010321233,0.007915743,0.0031551968,0.007382226,0.0010891691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008890459,0.0000111546215,0.0002261814,0.000008935321,0.0000043182276,0.00004403307,0.00009751022,0.00053235673,0.00010503496,0.99539435,0.0011288952,0.0024384146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000149227835,0.000008607848,0.0001999293,0.000024222345,0.0000060174875,0.000042162254,0.000044418884,0.0029991497,0.00014457914,0.9925861,0.0039212075,0.000008777263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024592492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002027751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016578361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023557462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042710886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08767581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125205392","doi":"10.1287/orsc.1110.0658","title":"Let's Work It Out (or We'll See You in Court): Litigation and Private Dispute Resolution in Vertical Exchange Relationships","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Leverage (statistics); Corporate governance; Perspective (graphical); Shadow (psychology); Law and economics; Business; Litigation risk analysis; Dispute mechanism; Economics; Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Audit; Political science; Accounting; Finance; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08769435697880522,"score_gpt":0.23247964444974784,"score_spread":0.1447852874709426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125205392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93130153,0.0011010662,0.012524419,0.00925608,0.000032016662,0.00005193874,0.000028064524,0.000008506725,0.045696482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99789447,0.00026013303,0.0005564515,0.00019734447,0.000026456471,0.000015423699,0.00000826742,0.000002233073,0.0010393631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942292,0.003806738,0.00025083745,0.00037058772,0.00064139103,0.0007012728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541007,0.028694037,0.013584495,0.0009782193,0.0011381118,0.00150453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064817164,0.00014810993,0.00028569493,0.0012574669,0.003270981,0.006750627,0.0006720556,0.0024299915,0.0067782244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029504733,0.00018929802,0.0003180123,0.0012174277,0.00602435,0.008939036,0.0025477817,0.0018712976,0.0005357757],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004425668,0.0010619101,0.12764534,0.00027154788,0.000096281765,0.0013151832,0.03383388,0.0077328254,0.002043176,0.75235254,0.0024301396,0.07077467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019535069,0.00087343,0.14900021,0.00047077116,0.00016390155,0.0016027137,0.06700733,0.02627324,0.002497891,0.731092,0.02067821,0.00014495842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025972482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023159138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067782244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019832426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001530415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03427905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126081121","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.936399","title":"Rules of Proof, Courts, and Incentives","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Burden of proof; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.011728127980326871,"score_gpt":0.20786625131780576,"score_spread":0.19613812333747888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126081121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108451255,0.017637722,0.3017556,0.09425249,0.0011960174,0.00041114062,0.0009190079,0.00027292245,0.47510388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529486,0.0027819173,0.025518134,0.0028232816,0.0010620657,0.00025787184,0.000143806,0.00007261557,0.014391658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96429163,0.018695828,0.002886459,0.0036736305,0.007828147,0.0026243287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7780107,0.17802365,0.015768686,0.011975324,0.012338712,0.0038829164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03490565,0.000618167,0.0018777488,0.0030749051,0.0038588722,0.016802127,0.0026060592,0.009150779,0.009471709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16745669,0.0011440841,0.0007647769,0.0027187788,0.016097369,0.011936609,0.0029721388,0.006880714,0.0012959107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013782143,0.00001406054,0.0003027991,0.00001857059,0.0000075958856,0.000018769864,0.00010101032,0.0006210135,0.00002722423,0.99413884,0.0014797994,0.0032565123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018144607,0.000003824485,0.000103146,0.000018049908,0.0000036849158,0.000016526574,0.00003259405,0.0011043816,0.000030112156,0.9964929,0.0021706966,0.000005926394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004514586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040545515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03490565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005376453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008030391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18460095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127175800","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2396047","title":"A Theory of Contracts with Limited Enforcement","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01268253943312752,"score_gpt":0.1845737715190291,"score_spread":0.17189123208590157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127175800","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049314298,0.0029241866,0.70646554,0.023037773,0.0003303926,0.00018649948,0.00064128806,0.0002728579,0.21682714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8712586,0.0026582147,0.065813415,0.0023610746,0.0011780849,0.00045667618,0.0003041861,0.00009685151,0.055872876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955882,0.0019569828,0.00021857541,0.0006214473,0.001155975,0.0004587586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801175,0.0134546105,0.0015067485,0.002668946,0.0015605849,0.0006915784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061940374,0.000694028,0.0013480489,0.0017376629,0.0026121868,0.005884345,0.0038615053,0.006267879,0.021146916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023725132,0.00095020386,0.0015096241,0.0021761183,0.007719399,0.01262373,0.0024305105,0.0050623203,0.001782568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034111818,0.000006346386,0.000039261136,0.000009229411,0.0000018885069,0.000014336023,0.000028552353,0.0010990783,0.00001879051,0.9972474,0.0005384506,0.0009932177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012568077,0.00000476408,0.000037574737,0.000012855475,0.0000026486377,0.000033492408,0.000014984761,0.008045991,0.0000144997175,0.99018365,0.0016333689,0.0000035809624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026018051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015438219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021146916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003417419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003953321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0707435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127682115","doi":"10.7202/043130ar","title":"Droit et droiture : le critère de la malhonnêteté et la fraude criminelle","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.010231674192039183,"score_gpt":0.22210504436229092,"score_spread":0.21187337017025173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127682115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22253232,0.0058250776,0.013136803,0.04438703,0.00056675886,0.00015612408,0.00026460068,0.00005873791,0.71307254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9534609,0.0011667599,0.0029041814,0.0029291888,0.00018654435,0.0001518537,0.000050011702,0.000039824616,0.039110776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99119043,0.0026168071,0.0004769011,0.00073177816,0.0036768878,0.0013072855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918846,0.002878001,0.0021043771,0.0006410109,0.0014878245,0.0010042307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003652015,0.0005416145,0.0006456237,0.00274927,0.0062351343,0.010987135,0.0016565684,0.0048836553,0.005567406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012746526,0.00042681166,0.0005363589,0.0016474733,0.019061403,0.004659796,0.006954104,0.005589236,0.00089423306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002091243,0.000023244596,0.0073279543,0.000046003723,0.000008267245,0.00017711769,0.0075859693,0.0001397709,0.00021713748,0.97121304,0.0030673465,0.010173245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004344956,0.00018940849,0.08164129,0.0016439257,0.00006916052,0.002380785,0.02673291,0.002342432,0.0027224955,0.4333603,0.4486593,0.00021459315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020600507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02864998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020600507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057895402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006879287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042006195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128057833","doi":"10.7202/601411ar","title":"Essai sur le risque moral","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.058258506459894006,"score_gpt":0.21748175590908425,"score_spread":0.15922324944919025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128057833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034312118,0.065520965,0.15860817,0.12861556,0.0034986092,0.000043865795,0.0003822569,0.00024003569,0.60877836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79120845,0.045497246,0.03007093,0.01264591,0.005793525,0.00018511416,0.00029144605,0.0003572408,0.11395006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.993541,0.0023926313,0.00021305948,0.0012985587,0.0020061207,0.0005486296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98605436,0.009346958,0.00091053365,0.0014929646,0.0015717382,0.00062348245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005627735,0.0010985176,0.001396697,0.0019138376,0.0022511617,0.008913052,0.0016328768,0.003528381,0.020286998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015534822,0.0005306635,0.0015382064,0.0015111954,0.010150289,0.0127622755,0.005862689,0.011048992,0.003363683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014465673,0.000009566407,0.00020826489,0.000051695682,0.000012546427,0.000027171734,0.00017748486,0.00088478683,0.00010274926,0.9906466,0.0027601065,0.0051046414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009432999,0.00001626764,0.00040560437,0.00015172693,0.000014865785,0.000069808724,0.0002211533,0.0018951981,0.00020594851,0.9393882,0.057600897,0.000021004282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033986664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022906393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020286998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058026114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002372062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0678668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128300911","doi":"10.1177/001979390005300406","title":"The Impact of Representation and other Factors on the Outcomes of Employee-Initiated Workers' Compensation Appeals","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Labor Relations Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Representation (politics); Workers' compensation; Compensation (psychology); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Political science; Law; Social psychology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.14054279964012378,"score_gpt":0.3132548336550987,"score_spread":0.17271203401497492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128300911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904812,0.00062293117,0.00026651126,0.00090757,0.000012906701,0.000084028805,0.00200768,0.00001208326,0.005605127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99665534,0.00020348582,0.00006239413,0.000047434052,0.000016986083,0.000016824268,0.0011318526,0.0000028795612,0.0018627322],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99010134,0.0032189202,0.00061172544,0.00076969014,0.0029399404,0.0023583106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8920392,0.04859895,0.042963706,0.0026670024,0.008440278,0.005290875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00884409,0.00021860485,0.000666466,0.002628047,0.0016409103,0.003102312,0.0013731963,0.0013082556,0.0040651616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066730745,0.00022053841,0.000746455,0.0039472454,0.0012384381,0.0008549352,0.0011359726,0.0015603869,0.00061742804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020398396,0.00010832422,0.9913202,0.00002511134,0.00009777817,0.0002694376,0.00061496685,0.00072461326,0.00007948634,0.0005764966,0.0011930144,0.0047866665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017130225,0.00006733967,0.9964431,0.000013056657,0.00004410141,0.000086240456,0.000602209,0.0012565786,0.000057316858,0.00022011837,0.0011805116,0.000012251822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55719715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6861404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55719715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009496427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056825355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8908212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128944627","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2011.00141.x","title":"Optimal information transmission in a holdup problem","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Transmission (telecommunications); Information transmission; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Computer network; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.03724675036204947,"score_gpt":0.19111707226574268,"score_spread":0.1538703219036932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128944627","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3544144,0.0017335581,0.5730099,0.009990914,0.00015934434,0.00041563512,0.0008868946,0.0003120522,0.059077233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9535856,0.0006715368,0.030289872,0.00033742219,0.00011231911,0.00022001461,0.00023054102,0.00009346555,0.014459333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575186,0.0023017942,0.00024799,0.000549429,0.000545572,0.0006033391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772003,0.018624786,0.0016283625,0.00097164814,0.00065451476,0.0009203557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071456945,0.0010434212,0.0022777803,0.0010045216,0.0016180297,0.003890498,0.0020596688,0.005513035,0.009443245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023197962,0.0012499724,0.00085045426,0.0012872221,0.0031551954,0.008386066,0.0026509205,0.0039016788,0.0007535047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038194266,0.00023465327,0.00072212017,0.00020062864,0.0000690371,0.0006497975,0.0005152405,0.19243564,0.0010608832,0.7788612,0.0037270475,0.021141728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001960761,0.00013336372,0.00031610465,0.00006518904,0.00002522908,0.00013662182,0.00022785825,0.37201348,0.00061138684,0.6239615,0.002267273,0.000045951547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026965623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013911149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009443245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002960279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003237254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037790477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129815477","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2342882","title":"Microfoundations of the Rule of Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Vector Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Microfoundations; Law; Economics; Mathematical economics; Law and economics; Political science; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.013764930287617775,"score_gpt":0.19898789941054154,"score_spread":0.18522296912292377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129815477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81703645,0.0014552466,0.054235853,0.018039739,0.000110825895,0.00008223104,0.0018006918,0.00022175991,0.10701719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995243,0.00024355644,0.0013291232,0.00015164111,0.00009374735,0.000022116115,0.0001184447,0.000014850266,0.0027835227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761534,0.0007729404,0.00013078297,0.0005415187,0.0004913113,0.00044809896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9292965,0.053274896,0.008978157,0.0038801434,0.0025869273,0.001983395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003256256,0.00016322717,0.00104828,0.001603022,0.0010275191,0.004998339,0.00087677705,0.0014154144,0.015048056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03281259,0.00046373473,0.0004350133,0.0015429512,0.0034747731,0.0036068764,0.0010424986,0.00282697,0.001045362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010581156,0.00015388182,0.03941447,0.000066072564,0.000119126074,0.00025715973,0.00057440734,0.008389088,0.00032635708,0.93001664,0.0051080687,0.015468901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059722563,0.00004617084,0.028881073,0.000030096186,0.000046005705,0.00010911781,0.00031169257,0.015768455,0.00017243678,0.95163196,0.0029221515,0.000021073456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070117125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007395803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015048056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014362042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018277804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05034077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130157079","doi":"","title":"Foreword: Debates Over Group Litigation in Comparative Perspective: What Can We Learn From Each Other","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Damages; Enforcement; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.05096546427562636,"score_gpt":0.28805598858852627,"score_spread":0.2370905243128999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130157079","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013978414,0.107124485,0.0011367459,0.77469134,0.015640823,0.000020214426,0.00007477665,0.000020486596,0.09989327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1505372,0.17630999,0.002957216,0.50923765,0.13268463,0.00035020467,0.000252325,0.00024359673,0.027427133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880954,0.007658523,0.0003985979,0.0011414973,0.0017132278,0.0009927505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93163204,0.05860514,0.0018980856,0.0013833678,0.0043147295,0.0021665832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017101454,0.0009835515,0.0020899533,0.0063179047,0.012414743,0.022752518,0.0062556164,0.021936476,0.02305166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0427973,0.0004457312,0.0011857739,0.0089583155,0.04265017,0.043803286,0.005996728,0.021200737,0.0033938147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031290492,0.00003490241,0.00023348506,0.00056463614,0.000015328213,0.00014685593,0.008040537,0.00009301603,0.000027161186,0.79013926,0.18428518,0.01638838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019850559,0.000034767887,0.0011006008,0.0039359042,0.000016156931,0.00022742039,0.02628948,0.0001833003,0.000047078243,0.3398467,0.6282583,0.00004046973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01189155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012223616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02305166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01388327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007336757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10073066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130796309","doi":"10.1111/1467-6478.00247","title":"Evaluating the Scottish Public Defence Solicitors’ Office","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Conviction; Public defender; Law; Public office; Business; Political science; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.08222842579535214,"score_gpt":0.2791853581653373,"score_spread":0.19695693236998515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130796309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71882373,0.0022795114,0.001261568,0.06584823,0.001488387,0.0013040971,0.0014174645,0.00027258668,0.20730454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9455278,0.00062220194,0.0010974695,0.013579833,0.00048317542,0.00036589606,0.00044730742,0.0000681732,0.037808105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95241714,0.011860235,0.0020323026,0.0012069643,0.02233385,0.010149527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.843329,0.061116107,0.01498603,0.006572617,0.049394697,0.024601545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04679848,0.0004574129,0.00046620658,0.0033153992,0.009521964,0.012212353,0.0024802834,0.005400972,0.017296966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10530819,0.0006759056,0.0007442481,0.0024029445,0.0040603075,0.0042184135,0.007933973,0.0033598198,0.0028455118],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006754506,0.0023270824,0.25598234,0.0014938934,0.0003057004,0.011541772,0.045169514,0.0017156099,0.0067076148,0.061691165,0.35189983,0.25441095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009903824,0.0037972494,0.304732,0.00069063646,0.00024739187,0.0012973371,0.06362439,0.0017450256,0.004188205,0.002602257,0.6157039,0.0003812326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.117368616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25158796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117368616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022407461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025321195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24749696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132116585","doi":"10.3386/w14477","title":"Outsourcing when Investments are Specific and Complementary","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outsourcing; Business; Industrial organization; Commerce; Marketing","score_opus":0.4104848841808086,"score_gpt":0.41078021725542785,"score_spread":0.00029533307461926395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132116585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852083,0.0004107534,0.0022217797,0.00030484993,0.0000030420113,0.000052986597,0.0008482514,0.0000145539825,0.010935565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985569,0.00012956711,0.00023841612,0.000014493257,0.0000045280462,0.000012725114,0.00032099197,0.0000012981745,0.0007211239],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783283,0.00027864028,0.00011607317,0.0002907759,0.00047884227,0.0010027202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98853254,0.003171966,0.005834052,0.0012275787,0.00059483066,0.0006390841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017430036,0.0003693545,0.0006961534,0.0014935412,0.0009782661,0.0018814892,0.0006600614,0.00067598943,0.004133356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015262612,0.0002738676,0.00050071446,0.0029466837,0.001860975,0.0018522226,0.0014961362,0.0006430347,0.00024141549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002978327,0.00016681445,0.88749593,0.00012362549,0.0001508019,0.0009761853,0.0012478976,0.023873629,0.0009879038,0.04765358,0.0011987559,0.035826966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008158336,0.00010772096,0.888031,0.00011672511,0.00015751076,0.0008889274,0.0031890091,0.038302634,0.0014116865,0.060496274,0.0071460363,0.0000708497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18275979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25034365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18275979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004726572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028715557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.363392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132137694","doi":"","title":"RATS IN THE KALEIDOSCOPE: RATIONALITY, IRRATIONALITY, AND THE ECONOMICS AND PSYCHOLOGY OF OPTING IN AND OUT OF THE CISG (KALEIDOSCOPE PART II)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Kaleidoscope; Irrationality; Satisficing; Law and economics; Rationality; Heuristics; Economics; Law; Positive economics; Sociology; Political science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02541815919391481,"score_gpt":0.2555972671550961,"score_spread":0.2301791079611813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132137694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34953222,0.015041984,0.07524689,0.12764455,0.0016331446,0.00010520488,0.00021350311,0.00012493829,0.43045756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97618675,0.0034628743,0.004632672,0.0032221547,0.00037873685,0.000085187065,0.00002131353,0.000024445077,0.0119858375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984497,0.0007577054,0.00005722649,0.00028198963,0.0003502924,0.00010311285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683195,0.0019386378,0.00058223447,0.0002744336,0.00025803995,0.00011467665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002332257,0.00023644582,0.00045915315,0.0006633641,0.0014722492,0.004262193,0.00042797177,0.0012229687,0.003612759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067258906,0.00017125953,0.00040860559,0.0007093151,0.013417545,0.0055892547,0.0017198405,0.0031195278,0.0003678458],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029990802,0.000014639382,0.0008843277,0.000023107805,0.000011990265,0.00006903659,0.0016119325,0.00058061065,0.00022397998,0.98451495,0.0031315486,0.008903907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010136841,0.000011171623,0.00091859815,0.000025690404,0.000005275234,0.00003517962,0.00046169516,0.00058216427,0.000064645326,0.9879551,0.009919049,0.000011275242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024767807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014107273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004262193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001937281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009188508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014056027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132897157","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.1070.0736","title":"Final-Offer Arbitration and Risk Aversion in Bargaining","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Arbitration; Bargaining problem; Outcome (game theory); Stipulation; Salary; Economics; Risk aversion (psychology); Microeconomics; Nash equilibrium; League; Wage bargaining; Workgroup; Mathematical economics; Wage; Expected utility hypothesis; Computer science; Labour economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.029015345201482683,"score_gpt":0.2203578720737928,"score_spread":0.1913425268723101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132897157","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20714928,0.0011717316,0.69854724,0.0046192836,0.00023658627,0.00020822331,0.000097619384,0.00018791182,0.08778212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97008395,0.0004351175,0.020014744,0.000200234,0.00013086012,0.00011635899,0.00002246467,0.000027060043,0.008969199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941239,0.0035517192,0.0002101399,0.0006323821,0.00073121703,0.00075069733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98390573,0.011471766,0.0026104613,0.00077807176,0.0006085002,0.0006255042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009269463,0.0009928335,0.0012075227,0.0009821198,0.0018077277,0.0046443627,0.0016771579,0.003056962,0.0074708476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028352026,0.0006787783,0.0013472654,0.0010701653,0.0075983224,0.005576085,0.0035485397,0.0041012163,0.0008028777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007546718,0.00006642207,0.0006555961,0.00004339679,0.000030024095,0.00016919433,0.00043231048,0.05430116,0.00046064125,0.9371805,0.00051966636,0.0060655517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056126366,0.000045913057,0.00029444852,0.0000226712,0.000019014697,0.00006766879,0.00015046145,0.11038677,0.00020760017,0.88750607,0.0012073596,0.00003580449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018013135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079935807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009269463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022581771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013836464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049022198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134186859","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-4085.2005.00320.x","title":"Partial outsourcing, monitoring cost, and market structure","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cournot competition; Outsourcing; Industrial organization; Competition (biology); Novelty; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Set (abstract data type); Business; Market structure; Economics; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.08879195423648563,"score_gpt":0.18097066066513529,"score_spread":0.09217870642864966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134186859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96914744,0.00036337873,0.020473808,0.00071706786,0.00000920361,0.00006210953,0.00020565763,0.000035118737,0.008986145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99846065,0.000055432793,0.0007546114,0.000012236012,0.000007037542,0.000008939091,0.00002513165,0.0000023873415,0.0006735557],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989517,0.0003343856,0.000052166277,0.0001287951,0.00018743832,0.00034551576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96673757,0.021346552,0.0078048897,0.0014793479,0.001215547,0.0014160073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037729535,0.00034136808,0.00090996973,0.00062744034,0.0005704598,0.001987028,0.0008887825,0.0008053865,0.011186779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021046689,0.00034259266,0.0003819322,0.0008677069,0.0016714226,0.0037570945,0.0009707942,0.00094099983,0.00024357447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017464267,0.0008374115,0.117838964,0.00044995555,0.00022616117,0.0012492766,0.00046500078,0.44746408,0.00621886,0.34491917,0.0029439619,0.07564077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028300378,0.0007428291,0.10470852,0.00010388464,0.0001572855,0.00056014874,0.0012219812,0.6155286,0.0044284756,0.26965514,0.0025264805,0.0000837311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033619232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033534423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011186779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024587556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014017379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03742349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136488086","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5915.2004.02465.x","title":"A Comparison of Arbitration Procedures for Risk‐Averse Disputants*","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Decision Sciences","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Computer science; Value (mathematics); Microeconomics; Economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08261345288899215,"score_gpt":0.32583263021620923,"score_spread":0.2432191773272171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136488086","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44025028,0.0010876899,0.54324013,0.0017688124,0.00014037728,0.000533474,0.00014310119,0.00043785814,0.012398277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471158,0.0001949025,0.051490482,0.000090845606,0.00003718854,0.00012803283,0.000083841,0.000034222787,0.00082478416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97972965,0.013462342,0.0009451192,0.0010249031,0.0037992005,0.0010389012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8976502,0.08430198,0.0045201033,0.0079046525,0.004145333,0.0014777498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026503729,0.0005749385,0.002106921,0.0022174246,0.0012179276,0.003611117,0.0027275886,0.0032139383,0.0032330484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09855731,0.00053293386,0.0012496415,0.0014231901,0.0025732792,0.005922043,0.0031478354,0.002680106,0.00043558012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022505934,0.0008167602,0.004685683,0.00030453558,0.00041107173,0.00016478212,0.0009916971,0.35840264,0.0043886537,0.48334047,0.002829356,0.14141378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018493502,0.00035884557,0.0010664968,0.000029396258,0.00005458662,0.00008699082,0.00016720845,0.8478636,0.001989856,0.14683701,0.0013026709,0.00005844556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012735934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088919466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026503729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018412609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024796522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14016676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138216999","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1622625","title":"Optimal Liability Sharing and Court Errors: An Exploratory Analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Moral hazard; Liability; Business; Adverse selection; Information asymmetry; Imperfect; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Actuarial science; Public economics; Economics; Finance; Microeconomics; Incentive","score_opus":0.01815338420220688,"score_gpt":0.22437144897601982,"score_spread":0.20621806477381294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138216999","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93526,0.0010882275,0.036807418,0.0029757933,0.000018339415,0.00016378262,0.0005953872,0.00006193196,0.023029178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99701166,0.00024311662,0.0012093312,0.00004075837,0.000026331722,0.000018107283,0.000062733794,0.000007982159,0.0013798495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968656,0.0017164936,0.00013300915,0.00030270274,0.00037943176,0.00060275337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8826332,0.10680406,0.005285661,0.0022799633,0.0018008399,0.0011962925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006250964,0.00054040964,0.0016050341,0.0015726892,0.0008626053,0.003296985,0.0017107762,0.0022550412,0.017083773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04422402,0.00065567164,0.0012123834,0.0015188848,0.0018294026,0.0052542635,0.0016610152,0.0025158776,0.00036152956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013247002,0.0013780766,0.05799647,0.00043500224,0.0004801902,0.0012360452,0.0016747823,0.24768369,0.0013973966,0.6465899,0.0033477396,0.036456086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002491807,0.0007326183,0.040449403,0.00009934949,0.00044964696,0.0006063335,0.0032245908,0.2573518,0.00077824475,0.69437873,0.0015916958,0.000088415516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003132412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029480234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017083773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019985626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022365502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0571509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139146708","doi":"10.7202/013041ar","title":"Quels fondements à l’incomplétude des contrats?","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04469464082896035,"score_gpt":0.22484592527669917,"score_spread":0.1801512844477388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139146708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19302683,0.0106676705,0.19153793,0.03579197,0.00043292413,0.00010896407,0.00041662902,0.00021447166,0.5678026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633296,0.0032173344,0.012157528,0.001566276,0.00040833117,0.00008242158,0.00016280581,0.00010627755,0.018969307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99304634,0.0021736207,0.00032833387,0.0016592335,0.0021997355,0.000592623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96798253,0.019780615,0.0049098954,0.0039340155,0.0026408632,0.0007520254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065733828,0.0005244921,0.0008876717,0.002085196,0.0028609245,0.00818006,0.00196845,0.004200281,0.02311197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034395736,0.00061278784,0.0010681597,0.0017812517,0.017585827,0.013848349,0.0029784248,0.004488717,0.0013914879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010311553,0.000007113088,0.0011263017,0.000037641443,0.000010884702,0.000070346214,0.00067121146,0.0004470222,0.000054351567,0.9918677,0.00047583968,0.0052212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010358717,0.000013784917,0.0017187007,0.00012817397,0.000017463284,0.00020823827,0.00069813343,0.0014112317,0.00020087727,0.9709004,0.024675127,0.00001750911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059780376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005030738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02311197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039476207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002834129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07731724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139403671","doi":"","title":"To Give In or Not To Give In To Bribery? Setting the Optimal Fines for Violations of Rules when the Enforcers are Likely to Ask for Bribes 1","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ask price; Enforcement; Language change; Contrast (vision); Law and economics; Law enforcement; Economics; Microeconomics; Business; Law; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Finance; Philosophy","score_opus":0.065855234186349,"score_gpt":0.32038981122486604,"score_spread":0.254534577038517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139403671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6646085,0.0014838654,0.19631118,0.024243483,0.0004380312,0.00031679956,0.000856453,0.0003167639,0.11142493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908104,0.00018759628,0.00519373,0.00031158692,0.000061915925,0.000049131242,0.00003323746,0.00002696659,0.0033253788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485683,0.0024505714,0.00018124348,0.0007507678,0.00039642354,0.0013641401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979428,0.0108874515,0.0057352846,0.0009963455,0.001135418,0.0018173922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071132844,0.00063774077,0.0019001521,0.0011433798,0.0022368715,0.0063741286,0.0015985189,0.005530411,0.011129725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038191672,0.0012133619,0.00057157304,0.0007905934,0.0034482926,0.005117486,0.0021394885,0.0048830346,0.0011976748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012104005,0.0009113712,0.01722595,0.00044397163,0.00023405279,0.0010466715,0.0010246314,0.19152811,0.005263311,0.72063893,0.01451175,0.04596087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040739065,0.00038079056,0.011244169,0.00020586648,0.00008566288,0.00042730873,0.0017008982,0.19734001,0.0015401553,0.78045774,0.0060286894,0.00018124857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004572677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051919487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011129725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030262778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003051439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037619054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140045483","doi":"","title":"Privacy, Driving Data and Automobile Insurance: An Economic Analysis","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Automobile insurance; Welfare; Moral hazard; Business; Economic welfare; Actuarial science; Public economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Incentive; Market economy","score_opus":0.04226724001057377,"score_gpt":0.23794809978054995,"score_spread":0.19568085976997618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140045483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79324186,0.014695615,0.08218956,0.020127615,0.00021213757,0.00038767746,0.001776423,0.000107808344,0.08726138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809325,0.0052604284,0.0031556988,0.00038798584,0.00018705797,0.000095688396,0.000233168,0.000018210745,0.009729288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915683,0.00036473776,0.000022347393,0.000072280265,0.00015523592,0.00022853959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496365,0.0038513378,0.0006588724,0.00013031636,0.00019245829,0.0002033007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019542333,0.0005083968,0.0009112443,0.0016688791,0.0010990242,0.0031003908,0.0007129676,0.0018638888,0.007644828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065294555,0.00049861264,0.0013192295,0.002129819,0.0017725223,0.0034150064,0.0014874438,0.0023381973,0.00033851166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032629736,0.00049500866,0.019350769,0.00025166787,0.0003189996,0.0008120143,0.000256778,0.15408818,0.0009391568,0.7951442,0.009088099,0.018928856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018634365,0.00026504,0.026637098,0.00016156533,0.0004203478,0.00046356322,0.0006798107,0.5703979,0.00062263024,0.3871582,0.012892227,0.00011528574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013459358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010609579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013459358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044746757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017374891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032466173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142313989","doi":"10.1111/irel.12030","title":"Labor Law and Reaching a First Collective Agreement: Evidence From a Quasi‐Experimental Set of Reforms in Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Relations A Journal of Economy and Society","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Negotiation; Collective bargaining; Compulsory arbitration; Certification; Economics; Law; Labor contract; Labour economics; Labor relations; Political science","score_opus":0.07132848379940894,"score_gpt":0.23622438305836704,"score_spread":0.1648958992589581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142313989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99509525,0.00008577273,0.0002216104,0.00037272673,0.000013051699,0.00044381636,0.00016299888,0.0000050832114,0.003599791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995611,0.0000934343,0.00035296576,0.00018340783,0.000012424695,0.00044880208,0.00014607605,0.000004166652,0.0031477127],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832359,0.008180416,0.00051480875,0.0013242124,0.0037510744,0.002993545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95763975,0.013588029,0.01534138,0.0049181427,0.0055817994,0.002930971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013632013,0.0003308052,0.00080329285,0.00079506513,0.0077911085,0.0020604106,0.0018118133,0.0013384484,0.0040417383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035686288,0.000732768,0.00050601334,0.0016093801,0.00779283,0.0011247012,0.0016457802,0.0012978789,0.00047847422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012371991,0.028184654,0.7193755,0.0007796732,0.0007017236,0.0004696964,0.1059781,0.0035957864,0.009214501,0.016570974,0.009796912,0.09296053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023948036,0.0048515224,0.94256735,0.00010970851,0.00017663429,0.000035206114,0.028065842,0.0018229473,0.0017828479,0.0013497963,0.01674294,0.00010034235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93024695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.964455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06975305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055887666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054175723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40549535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144445555","doi":"10.7202/017518ar","title":"Les fondements incomplets de l’incomplétude : Une revue critique de la théorie des contrats incomplets*","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06286348249920534,"score_gpt":0.2664539515383012,"score_spread":0.20359046903909586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144445555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12933558,0.020428898,0.32053906,0.06730396,0.0004834991,0.00011740203,0.0002528434,0.00016017324,0.46137863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9575417,0.007877826,0.015135194,0.0016819752,0.0005374782,0.00014138178,0.00008485394,0.00010700245,0.016892573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533635,0.0016116798,0.00019894396,0.0008167576,0.0016170598,0.00041924164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97729117,0.016060796,0.0021254334,0.0025689064,0.0015446497,0.00040893053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007848715,0.0005943788,0.0011722774,0.0026556877,0.0030366944,0.0074949972,0.0028036453,0.005256131,0.008763885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0172389,0.0007278711,0.0015101597,0.002608296,0.030004308,0.01487574,0.0036415327,0.00644379,0.0007796186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002897909,0.0000035223973,0.00015988293,0.00001662455,0.000003888,0.000020085841,0.00034221838,0.00059322926,0.000011135296,0.9971898,0.0002268365,0.0014297608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050495446,0.0000065807494,0.00025656365,0.000058794936,0.0000073440033,0.00004540176,0.00021563859,0.0021867827,0.000049414968,0.9884122,0.008749275,0.0000069526986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061056907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045202686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008763885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058189556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004135698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04221964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144536307","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2571714","title":"Quotas and the Transatlantic Divergence of Corporate Governance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Corporate governance; Divergence (linguistics); Business; Computer science; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.02847991912397025,"score_gpt":0.19417232692826508,"score_spread":0.16569240780429484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144536307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8248376,0.002183737,0.019110203,0.009134383,0.00010853395,0.000016615546,0.00011667781,0.000039262155,0.14445284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980101,0.00007735911,0.00040998246,0.00013256822,0.000019081697,0.0000044119547,0.000011755511,0.000005919442,0.0013289317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756694,0.001120745,0.00015418674,0.00043522235,0.00034250962,0.000380432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898121,0.0052269767,0.0016919788,0.0010433247,0.0013901156,0.00083558925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053154463,0.00014239275,0.00051318743,0.0009235915,0.0015314603,0.0054067257,0.0007325316,0.00190869,0.007008496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028361855,0.00021684695,0.00032994756,0.0011340285,0.005654107,0.0060519264,0.002571653,0.0027113417,0.00039121052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078774894,0.000016649925,0.004121153,0.000018602199,0.000013898656,0.00005813789,0.0015800302,0.0011136552,0.00039458132,0.98298633,0.00064166606,0.008976434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024562343,0.00002543746,0.008381001,0.00004040287,0.000010554093,0.00004591231,0.0010799359,0.003065438,0.00014549412,0.9841904,0.0029769896,0.000013886794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005061883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004739825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007008496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024338714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013061949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02811116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144842435","doi":"","title":"Contract Law is Not Enough: The Many Legal Institutions That Support Contractual Commitments","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Lawmaking; Transaction cost; Business; Contract management; Law and economics; Database transaction; Work (physics); Structuring; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance; Legislature","score_opus":0.035813479454849695,"score_gpt":0.23990625361273288,"score_spread":0.20409277415788318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144842435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24116582,0.025323156,0.09760972,0.3101686,0.00093228935,0.000095930554,0.00042726734,0.00027475168,0.32400244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98138213,0.0032789723,0.0062571275,0.0041299383,0.0004278275,0.00003359317,0.00008344391,0.00004138711,0.004365551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370265,0.0020688467,0.0002770018,0.000714549,0.002464545,0.0007724647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97767305,0.010244312,0.004513177,0.0033234062,0.0021611839,0.00208484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008039353,0.00023901048,0.0004917823,0.001392874,0.0034415545,0.009445052,0.0012938885,0.003049049,0.006264233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02596892,0.00043922098,0.00034272706,0.002299842,0.016234705,0.0187914,0.0039680423,0.004721846,0.000704366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015993955,0.000016106644,0.0015238969,0.000042360312,0.000007729084,0.000044449655,0.00046630774,0.00049601385,0.000094127296,0.98031896,0.0032782343,0.013695775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015784608,0.000012164407,0.0023909998,0.00017915606,0.000012554977,0.00015285674,0.0010186844,0.001197358,0.00013148553,0.96017617,0.034696918,0.00001596062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045079524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042274524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009445052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003866519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005405451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04251671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145438182","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2311.2004.00309.x","title":"Conditional Bail Decision Making in the Magistrates' Court","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Remand (court procedure); Law; Actuarial science; Political science; Psychology; Economics; Computer science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.05341010799892414,"score_gpt":0.2744937751659147,"score_spread":0.22108366716699057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145438182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99655426,0.00007903234,0.0006312065,0.00020745522,0.00000659909,0.00003350058,0.0000143356665,0.000007091406,0.0024665387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992304,0.000018166851,0.00043829947,0.000040931784,0.0000068270856,0.000009020231,0.000008177281,6.535486e-7,0.00024762974],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98660535,0.008815208,0.0006534443,0.0009516662,0.0014493275,0.001524943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94029427,0.040143948,0.012079154,0.002224215,0.0020475828,0.003210786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02190043,0.0003359442,0.0006617025,0.0007579012,0.0019988623,0.0028706382,0.0008863541,0.0018166968,0.0041497652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059222605,0.00033492775,0.00035329408,0.0004085647,0.0015944479,0.0011532882,0.0020101508,0.001431218,0.0005431659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013809924,0.0033632093,0.63711584,0.0005309067,0.00085203524,0.0065006786,0.015426586,0.053449713,0.026598742,0.060792286,0.0054403124,0.17611983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010420003,0.0089116935,0.74541664,0.0004288058,0.0005803967,0.0018777461,0.013151695,0.13053349,0.022058902,0.056036763,0.019468607,0.00049329695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002966138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055810977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02190043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022813233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021572239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11582196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146028267","doi":"10.1257/aer.102.1.202","title":"The Value of Information in the Court: Get it Right, Keep it Tight","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Supreme court; Economics; Private information retrieval; Value (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Ideology; Economic Justice; Supreme Court Decisions; Value of information; Law; Law and economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Politics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.019804394929309497,"score_gpt":0.24064330390547117,"score_spread":0.22083890897616168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146028267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8608004,0.0020377694,0.0574881,0.027461385,0.00017513912,0.000116399635,0.001378114,0.00011725239,0.05042536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99484396,0.00047313244,0.0022337253,0.00032231645,0.00008313246,0.000021963027,0.00013193474,0.000012873615,0.0018770198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720013,0.001543281,0.00008789221,0.000417234,0.00027977352,0.00047171843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97204226,0.020377146,0.004985375,0.0008860412,0.000937643,0.0007714867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052133203,0.0004638364,0.001128223,0.0018891817,0.0015182421,0.0076655224,0.0015554832,0.0037258994,0.0081382925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040463872,0.0006857661,0.0007164754,0.0031010674,0.0032206958,0.006343254,0.002057488,0.0033368245,0.001009421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056313555,0.0004619814,0.046377115,0.00022454074,0.00035735927,0.00053447764,0.0010811511,0.31318176,0.0008609341,0.57216823,0.014870938,0.0493183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002296975,0.00020264684,0.013109017,0.00011133078,0.00022699048,0.00016800733,0.0010044373,0.46853176,0.0005303315,0.51028055,0.0054837065,0.00012147191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013275174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011176024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013275174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063276445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002274338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045910478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146516662","doi":"10.7202/028786ar","title":"Final Position Arbitration and Intertemporal Compromise","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Arbitration; Position (finance); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.04721658018275756,"score_gpt":0.22423735291995886,"score_spread":0.1770207727372013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146516662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2402639,0.0018547773,0.112790324,0.020770535,0.00041674438,0.00021276678,0.0001097781,0.00015611247,0.62342507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96597046,0.00028706394,0.0048024287,0.00087585766,0.00013606226,0.00005621648,0.000026405738,0.000036321155,0.027809095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98717844,0.0038523977,0.00068279944,0.0023810153,0.0032375383,0.002667809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97542375,0.013764923,0.0036277813,0.0037005502,0.0024635468,0.0010195251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015094346,0.00047112632,0.00090220425,0.001377829,0.0043726,0.010348804,0.002799802,0.009690339,0.01892873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05711062,0.00047226003,0.00096149446,0.0016304255,0.008755878,0.008586882,0.0063123275,0.0082267355,0.0016533532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007142201,0.00002673668,0.00061936874,0.000018572238,0.000013918989,0.00013074027,0.0011168404,0.0014509826,0.00027725135,0.9876978,0.0012059204,0.007370522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003963353,0.000036792066,0.00076354225,0.000041875526,0.000017016624,0.00008390955,0.00082600454,0.0059829615,0.00045568062,0.97483575,0.01689555,0.00002120969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003600955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004614918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01892873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047142664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004152685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07982743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W214652637","doi":"","title":"The Conditions of Unitateral Resiliation of Contracts (La Résiliation Unilatérale Ou Les Joies De L’Exégèse) (French)","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Prerogative; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.01901085046720279,"score_gpt":0.21707168410566618,"score_spread":0.19806083363846338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W214652637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13594131,0.005246217,0.015865494,0.025815539,0.000441026,0.000096505064,0.00023508805,0.0000989509,0.81625986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96823335,0.00068724767,0.0017522031,0.0012637081,0.00013022579,0.00009663669,0.000028832135,0.00002309245,0.027784668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99441,0.002397651,0.00021161276,0.0007316828,0.00079443114,0.0014545507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963037,0.0019228829,0.00060973334,0.00034304813,0.0005394448,0.00028112927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050064963,0.00027522192,0.00027932224,0.00063840934,0.008300614,0.0076837237,0.0005712765,0.002833078,0.0081132315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008446961,0.00023409296,0.00035862924,0.00080442237,0.014742986,0.0040291166,0.0039482056,0.0027595442,0.00062306464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009964041,0.000003170804,0.00034636242,0.000012910768,0.0000013753662,0.00012548688,0.002813055,0.00009004883,0.000104306266,0.9919601,0.0015998486,0.0029333106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005276617,0.00009290251,0.010983084,0.00033057263,0.000017212136,0.0010473704,0.01480407,0.0012035953,0.00088751485,0.5969016,0.37359294,0.000086326436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037674256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032679312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037674256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067417384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007351907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074909925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147849167","doi":"","title":"Irreconcilable Differences: Judicial Resolution of Business Deadlock","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Equity (law); Valuation (finance); Law and economics; Private information retrieval; Information asymmetry; Economics; Finance; Law; Political science; Computer security","score_opus":0.04228472051955031,"score_gpt":0.19459085973801674,"score_spread":0.15230613921846642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147849167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59508127,0.0013621096,0.2378714,0.0071641454,0.000386708,0.00079115736,0.00013514778,0.00027377388,0.15693425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904469,0.00014412179,0.0066618877,0.00066578353,0.00008743921,0.00013385594,0.000015970507,0.000013493184,0.0018305748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9553749,0.02221633,0.0024261533,0.0052436506,0.010038831,0.0047001992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8935574,0.07417289,0.014713314,0.011856658,0.0041394397,0.0015602155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042835217,0.0005109339,0.0013108418,0.0012335695,0.0038123128,0.005319616,0.0033832656,0.0060285944,0.0080657145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12503152,0.00059848995,0.0011757883,0.0008636552,0.010653079,0.009321578,0.006207143,0.006580398,0.00063633005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015561105,0.00021516287,0.0017416578,0.00007851307,0.00004949921,0.00028944216,0.00088420516,0.0041938624,0.0011309258,0.976773,0.00090143684,0.013586547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042015084,0.00049449946,0.0022054403,0.00011988008,0.00010905747,0.00029152023,0.00093906926,0.023653343,0.0047123907,0.9568419,0.010124545,0.00008820658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011617763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009603428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042835217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029722757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052808807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22653699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151886146","doi":"10.7202/1027854ar","title":"L’obligation essentielle dans le contrat","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008386266181789021,"score_gpt":0.17702781153631023,"score_spread":0.1686415453545212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151886146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033524226,0.0075673186,0.042506125,0.068263695,0.00055693893,0.00007726486,0.00016162182,0.00007400899,0.84726894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78417534,0.0034402036,0.009654778,0.018251875,0.00087800215,0.00014724389,0.00013518098,0.00014549709,0.1831719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887938,0.0038080623,0.00038772673,0.0018740962,0.003951779,0.0011845811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99224275,0.003027647,0.0006890367,0.0013583752,0.0022016016,0.0004805973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006199582,0.00042470664,0.00056288345,0.0013850281,0.0059309853,0.009802664,0.0016837101,0.005270891,0.0111496905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011954135,0.0003422442,0.0005590338,0.00097528583,0.019974116,0.007231949,0.0032550863,0.0069922935,0.001621644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031640975,0.0000039247734,0.00014859797,0.0000141383025,0.0000020806183,0.00002673885,0.000973062,0.00007839515,0.00005962675,0.99446905,0.0020266462,0.002194552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001577177,0.000027073937,0.0029141903,0.0002788461,0.000012990676,0.00020495629,0.0019110241,0.0009486424,0.00049881125,0.5857946,0.40734765,0.00004545071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059105594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067114465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059105594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010910737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0133344745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117523134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153221284","doi":"10.3905/jpe.2007.682348","title":"Lead Trump or Risk Losing? <i>A Comparison of Bidding Procedures for the Acquisition of a Business in Canadian and U.S. Restructuring Proceedings</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Private Equity","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Restructuring; Bidding; Business; Finance; Portfolio; Bankruptcy; Creditor; Marketing; Debt","score_opus":0.04982487070805614,"score_gpt":0.282588058510331,"score_spread":0.23276318780227484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153221284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3937638,0.008209597,0.016049799,0.022835512,0.00029858714,0.0008013431,0.0005596945,0.00043332492,0.5570483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630775,0.0027239232,0.0054702014,0.00203879,0.00006989791,0.00007866677,0.00019559433,0.000109802415,0.026235666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98817396,0.002919496,0.0003180751,0.00039131253,0.0051118196,0.0030853865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905399,0.0042375266,0.0010569319,0.00045622393,0.002681056,0.001028345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007761113,0.00023597466,0.00034025154,0.002151205,0.005154481,0.0071165147,0.0017799445,0.0016096069,0.012057589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030204495,0.00027531743,0.00061617827,0.0022143829,0.004303442,0.0033866111,0.0011185266,0.0021983478,0.00121305],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004993453,0.0004452911,0.019249799,0.00029426994,0.000053084692,0.0003227926,0.011725902,0.0045797843,0.0012248397,0.6893284,0.044095904,0.22818063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051720033,0.0011366792,0.2933895,0.0009261433,0.00025633493,0.0007970416,0.06360253,0.024788544,0.006350889,0.23391952,0.37397015,0.00034540234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5301888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7525987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4698112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022835184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027398732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94515604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153327433","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2012.01263.x","title":"Does Tort Law Deter Individuals? A Behavioral Science Study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Sanctions; Variety (cybernetics); Liability; Strict liability; Joint and several liability; Tort reform; Law; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Actuarial science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.13115569724284648,"score_gpt":0.3604201102486919,"score_spread":0.22926441300584544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153327433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932777,0.00022494297,0.000116126685,0.0028233605,0.000012946994,0.000022359882,0.000032664415,0.0000012506595,0.0034886496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722964,0.00044060856,0.00013069787,0.0013780646,0.00003635002,0.000019558582,0.00003853222,0.0000010742929,0.00072537013],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639076,0.0025773752,0.000096638156,0.0002695992,0.00037075373,0.0002948682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97835004,0.014693447,0.0036642838,0.00090129295,0.0008295933,0.0015614638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056498405,0.00017600249,0.00042792343,0.0009697408,0.0013202797,0.0019717342,0.000366686,0.0016707821,0.003175836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016901169,0.00024315795,0.00048725947,0.0007551371,0.0019630287,0.0021660444,0.0009016057,0.0024186014,0.00047059872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032659707,0.008079969,0.9283205,0.0000885225,0.00026004392,0.0002411506,0.012999116,0.0004148816,0.00046099667,0.011854758,0.0023822975,0.034571193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060781953,0.0019452006,0.9695236,0.00008932298,0.000090796966,0.00036999595,0.0153889265,0.0015439568,0.00016974902,0.0053560073,0.0054270527,0.000034681296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003634783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047431216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056498405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006973682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062701054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02987951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153681470","doi":"10.1023/b:ejle.0000014573.80325.2c","title":"Harmonization of Environmental Regulations When Firms are Judgment Proof","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Law and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Harmonization; Commercial law; Liability; Economics; Competition (biology); Public finance; Strict liability; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Business; Accounting; Law; Political science; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.026362845403596874,"score_gpt":0.1778474496456037,"score_spread":0.15148460424200683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153681470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66006994,0.00027697292,0.053151652,0.013957953,0.00024897628,0.00054421317,0.00047932862,0.00038967375,0.2708813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922714,0.00003892707,0.0016967448,0.0006630119,0.00008515202,0.000052159976,0.00007680836,0.00001949576,0.005096168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809441,0.005961207,0.0014817879,0.003110941,0.0027564657,0.0057454687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91589296,0.04577937,0.01681046,0.01196919,0.006643044,0.0029049802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014336782,0.00028857728,0.0017794669,0.0010780544,0.00228505,0.0077278954,0.0019622573,0.007895861,0.025174223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09041096,0.00071739336,0.0010985264,0.0008886335,0.003765555,0.0071752067,0.0040502734,0.0047086426,0.0019451474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010934685,0.0011550629,0.022931935,0.00016750711,0.00023489994,0.0013542887,0.0022490376,0.020257391,0.0023929123,0.8692477,0.022646772,0.056269016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003909211,0.0003286821,0.019500472,0.0000468847,0.00012901048,0.0002543835,0.0023681219,0.024768857,0.0017686939,0.9364784,0.013894327,0.00007119834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003962955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040377113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025174223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019826877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054258807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08421618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153819352","doi":"10.7202/042193ar","title":"Prospectus Liability and Investor Protection in Quebec Law","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Prospectus; Political science; Humanities; Business; Art; Finance","score_opus":0.012858768951433766,"score_gpt":0.18807454200900933,"score_spread":0.17521577305757557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153819352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24436627,0.016101044,0.0033678964,0.05740752,0.00026768472,0.00013762485,0.000434045,0.0000712123,0.67784667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93033844,0.0027483155,0.00042270927,0.0034111184,0.000084497675,0.000031432068,0.0000602072,0.000010061162,0.06289322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980567,0.00035372266,0.0000579844,0.00014286426,0.0006207434,0.0007680634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545527,0.001975788,0.00052068336,0.00021609486,0.0013221796,0.0005098871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018207384,0.0001822253,0.00022382957,0.0016233155,0.0067241937,0.0056172498,0.0011178001,0.003472941,0.007376016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007165268,0.0002754792,0.00020209224,0.0017045131,0.0069005108,0.0015537114,0.0011919196,0.0024469853,0.0003130196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022206952,0.00003123349,0.010042686,0.000057889512,0.000011142911,0.00070677674,0.0031214254,0.0014644288,0.00019124859,0.94989574,0.0210885,0.013366708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001020263,0.00011378405,0.14879622,0.0012481642,0.00013079614,0.0010564879,0.010974373,0.0142095415,0.0009849912,0.32111767,0.5010648,0.00020123641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94064623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9661588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05935377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048960295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046858944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3552335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154333424","doi":"10.1023/a:1015683401986","title":"Replacement Cost Endorsement and Opportunistic Fraud in Automobile Insurance","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Risk and Uncertainty","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Automobile insurance; Business; Insurance fraud; Actuarial science; Internet privacy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.03433640269979697,"score_gpt":0.23479112338403327,"score_spread":0.2004547206842363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154333424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9326406,0.002922268,0.029914336,0.015578758,0.000093319024,0.00010072464,0.0002620501,0.000066440705,0.018421521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979431,0.00034811618,0.0005131998,0.00010576274,0.00008710308,0.000006602995,0.000018102208,0.0000026176228,0.0009753566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946219,0.002548486,0.00041602112,0.0005176168,0.0007355149,0.0011604741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86982375,0.099901095,0.021432644,0.0035241148,0.003594396,0.0017240717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009801446,0.00031564359,0.0013010504,0.0016398645,0.0015909274,0.004862198,0.0012501219,0.0072560287,0.006186387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07947199,0.0007070761,0.00078126707,0.0017991157,0.0051914193,0.0051916237,0.0017686574,0.0036204706,0.00026820166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010155971,0.0005869997,0.13622142,0.00019508225,0.00022542376,0.0031804738,0.0022971088,0.04160858,0.0008811014,0.76976436,0.00935778,0.034665972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023524523,0.00020047826,0.035926897,0.000080647515,0.00028509094,0.0018618644,0.0020664015,0.1814345,0.0006661827,0.773876,0.003243384,0.0001232936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0079573635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006682401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009801446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019497854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051835656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156036541","doi":"10.7202/601290ar","title":"Sécurité routière : efficacité, subvention et réglementation","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04334472863187753,"score_gpt":0.25138869101134936,"score_spread":0.20804396237947184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156036541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54763466,0.017965803,0.13907778,0.015512095,0.00018580895,0.00076804066,0.0013096659,0.00030652704,0.27723965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94161224,0.0066357963,0.015146346,0.00042343073,0.00013372033,0.0002170336,0.00026990028,0.00006452014,0.03549708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99281013,0.0035652663,0.00032208266,0.00051846023,0.0021747975,0.00060931116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832466,0.009140982,0.0035845211,0.001243435,0.002432288,0.00035224305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051039886,0.000781139,0.0011010037,0.0017895219,0.00070550776,0.0044715437,0.00090746535,0.0014986572,0.014601201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020994682,0.00042370497,0.0009958361,0.002531274,0.002904696,0.0038123128,0.0012881444,0.001433156,0.0014898542],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026008516,0.00034628136,0.05466983,0.0010715135,0.00033545046,0.000423908,0.0031652965,0.07012011,0.00290669,0.7026491,0.0028535905,0.16119814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017147308,0.0016323035,0.15168223,0.0018315465,0.00063094025,0.000857197,0.009295424,0.1373027,0.014407061,0.511158,0.170869,0.00016216609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017927358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0140450075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017927358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007312629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004012261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053057075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156305868","doi":"","title":"REGULATION AND DEREGULATION: PROPERTY RIGHTS ALLOCATION ISSUES IN THE DE REGULATION OF COMMON POOL RESOURCES","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deregulation; Lottery; Possession (linguistics); Property rights; Common value auction; Common-pool resource; Order (exchange); Business; Natural resource; Economics; Public economics; Law and economics; Market economy; Microeconomics; Political science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.0422613508940683,"score_gpt":0.28698915207744086,"score_spread":0.24472780118337256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156305868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34120825,0.0079888925,0.2835606,0.06251362,0.00047868778,0.00030026305,0.00025972287,0.00013665884,0.30355334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98199767,0.0009920463,0.0063270815,0.0026121575,0.00016977529,0.00014200117,0.00003019351,0.000029610956,0.00769962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98645604,0.007067351,0.0004872948,0.0015439362,0.0023878813,0.0020574627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97629845,0.015384917,0.0035290355,0.0027903288,0.0016804534,0.00031681245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013816757,0.0003882961,0.0010638833,0.0011519761,0.0027570536,0.009104607,0.001985851,0.0047087655,0.007248568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029100927,0.00044590884,0.0015621181,0.0019792344,0.0140539985,0.010907774,0.0027959757,0.0062210774,0.00054124807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012514102,0.000014732833,0.00065495085,0.00001405806,0.000008602178,0.000037169437,0.0002665359,0.0027930916,0.00016788181,0.9920117,0.00055597024,0.003462713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003436637,0.000046846024,0.0029736466,0.00012319988,0.00002586723,0.00008700775,0.00074257585,0.010267151,0.0011965786,0.9641432,0.020323463,0.000036121208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012100333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007069128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013816757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007961807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051814797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073070884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158837418","doi":"10.2202/1542-0485.1003","title":"Tough Love: Optimal Enforcement of Output Quotas in the Presence of Cheating","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Nebraska-Lincoln; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Enforcement; Cheating; Agency (philosophy); Public economics; Microeconomics; Welfare; Business; Work (physics); Economics; Politics; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Market economy; Sociology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.05481604726435212,"score_gpt":0.20493491165110472,"score_spread":0.1501188643867526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158837418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7132261,0.0012630301,0.21943858,0.007861121,0.00019732467,0.00047316318,0.00060298736,0.00028998873,0.056647696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895141,0.00019432216,0.0060779965,0.000227413,0.000054694217,0.000065015935,0.00004241009,0.000026653646,0.0037972936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959467,0.0018827489,0.00017252845,0.00064935355,0.00034599387,0.0010027757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725884,0.017904162,0.0057058786,0.0013872698,0.0009477683,0.0014664757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008096801,0.0008477172,0.003072297,0.0010339223,0.0013370897,0.0045171906,0.0017914855,0.0046016173,0.0074626035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03733106,0.00140659,0.0008744489,0.0007533313,0.0036078515,0.0054282127,0.002857246,0.004472183,0.0005457204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020611899,0.0011419015,0.013810294,0.00065042987,0.00045118562,0.0021038195,0.0010996693,0.43742722,0.006642083,0.4862934,0.0057093115,0.04260948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006359216,0.0006289659,0.00958138,0.00011757406,0.00014037231,0.0003442408,0.00085296034,0.43258736,0.0018038376,0.54943085,0.0037367241,0.0001397964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049727997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003127638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008096801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028379275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029313692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042820454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160156658","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v6n3p146","title":"Aristotle and Optimal Deterrence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deterrence (psychology); Rivalry; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Deterrence theory; Political science; Economics; Law; Sociology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.022819879087849403,"score_gpt":0.2124516383508058,"score_spread":0.1896317592629564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160156658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03767051,0.019774912,0.079477675,0.05207282,0.0009764326,0.00006436256,0.00015438185,0.00008323417,0.8097256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433725,0.0046011056,0.013075587,0.003107567,0.0007471659,0.000070860595,0.000045435972,0.000037268757,0.03494255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973851,0.0009883881,0.000093482144,0.00033867467,0.00083448866,0.00035985198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880433,0.0005833159,0.00010959428,0.00015623528,0.0002451306,0.00010144043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002664058,0.0004493347,0.00067336985,0.0010727891,0.00244186,0.003237017,0.00078624487,0.0034313335,0.00439533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00418145,0.00027398852,0.00045725226,0.0006081588,0.012489817,0.0034774127,0.00176678,0.0037559543,0.00072699384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027210444,0.0000029930177,0.000017288616,0.0000051656543,0.0000010911995,0.000005439409,0.00002763224,0.00032797124,0.000008012817,0.998013,0.0005864612,0.0010022128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004017306,0.0000018684293,0.00003575031,0.0000074513846,6.38706e-7,0.0000045788242,0.000012923453,0.00030943105,0.00001065284,0.99610245,0.0035082554,0.0000019811237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041846596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004487965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004674083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004674083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031104095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033912957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160190794","doi":"10.7202/602344ar","title":"Les clauses de valeur à neuf sont-elles optimales?","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07423901072730704,"score_gpt":0.25415916813116135,"score_spread":0.1799201574038543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160190794","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21632652,0.0041999505,0.44508857,0.03218228,0.0008892564,0.00029492416,0.00084206514,0.00045284303,0.29972365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90361,0.0011416409,0.066532895,0.0016625992,0.0003131079,0.00016003026,0.00016393294,0.00022533022,0.026190486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928352,0.0024541954,0.0004387262,0.0014290002,0.0017363363,0.0011064367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815222,0.011104599,0.0021398081,0.002422663,0.0022385765,0.0005721082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009661686,0.0008660937,0.0013319643,0.0010521234,0.0013567209,0.006986535,0.001966187,0.0038103939,0.017182441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04725858,0.0008209801,0.0008203224,0.000914578,0.0051097646,0.011735693,0.0016999859,0.0046135294,0.0018889633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009008838,0.00004529898,0.0010234598,0.000077204604,0.000039393086,0.00008037905,0.00024339897,0.00541568,0.0007233201,0.97252196,0.002051927,0.017687788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006086734,0.00007395784,0.0012066938,0.00013625585,0.00004487186,0.00018156682,0.0003564005,0.022235163,0.0016806622,0.9617347,0.012246333,0.000042409338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004260251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004448221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017182441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044355206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004034146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05748099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162077043","doi":"10.1111/caje.12071","title":"Ownership, Access, and Sequential Investment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property rights; Investment (military); Incentive; Veto; Business; Microeconomics; Industrial organization; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.1564728467612476,"score_gpt":0.19109348620615463,"score_spread":0.034620639444907036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162077043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.709344,0.0013990754,0.07310582,0.0057135243,0.00007478886,0.000117356045,0.00029018158,0.00005393065,0.20990142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941736,0.00016059511,0.0008671401,0.00006617477,0.000023857976,0.000016618298,0.000019629266,0.0000034733796,0.004669032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858224,0.00046510334,0.00008701053,0.00020252909,0.00028650495,0.0003766421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901394,0.00541016,0.0023265744,0.0007768924,0.0006382753,0.0007085471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021426568,0.0002045075,0.00032872934,0.0005291896,0.000782382,0.00249957,0.00054397056,0.0011017529,0.017828664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011141298,0.00018935687,0.00029114456,0.00053258706,0.003084214,0.0050298623,0.0020245085,0.0013746185,0.00040033503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006233842,0.00009825297,0.0075567164,0.00003633242,0.000016716125,0.00017582931,0.0002519263,0.0067081344,0.00047233576,0.97244906,0.0008144164,0.011357929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033406453,0.00007660726,0.0067034415,0.000048029015,0.000021475726,0.00015321196,0.00024129523,0.014016092,0.00047643052,0.97227854,0.0059374557,0.000014036135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003559883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002680936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017828664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016098161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012240503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05964285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163405423","doi":"","title":"Risk Distribution and the Law of Torts: Carrying Calabresi Further","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Contemporary Problems","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Tort; Distributive justice; Distributive property; Pareto principle; Economics; Unjust enrichment; Context (archaeology); Autonomy; Law and economics; Damages; Normative; Liability; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Microeconomics; Restitution","score_opus":0.021020439823140252,"score_gpt":0.18416093423410365,"score_spread":0.1631404944109634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163405423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029120043,0.06156288,0.11547502,0.2616063,0.0021008663,0.00007493901,0.0001769612,0.00014685506,0.52973616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8518146,0.028671311,0.031825285,0.026390323,0.006207747,0.00019969164,0.00008349884,0.00014934063,0.054658327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677616,0.001028044,0.00010964849,0.0005458645,0.0012616271,0.00027857945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962507,0.0024180969,0.0003477823,0.00039481875,0.00043400377,0.00015474246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057989485,0.00088960945,0.00079001277,0.0028429707,0.0031225884,0.008830061,0.0015266095,0.0066183987,0.0043653697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009822738,0.0005528637,0.0009854697,0.0017401528,0.03194364,0.021281105,0.0062158643,0.011946579,0.00075543154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017258807,0.0000030140022,0.000029179204,0.0000046013433,8.6886746e-7,0.000010431368,0.00013243606,0.000121499106,0.000010051562,0.99675566,0.0012139054,0.0017166211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038637454,0.0000039472206,0.00010442012,0.000047159243,0.0000022769982,0.000023794915,0.00006082042,0.0004614632,0.000026538108,0.9780985,0.021160522,0.0000066015623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009210758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057651126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009588137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009588137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033101062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069567144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167317498","doi":"10.3386/w7572","title":"Keiretsu and Relationship-Specific Investment: A Barrier to Trade?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Keiretsu; Investment (military); Business; International trade; International economics; Industrial organization; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.375167640843666,"score_gpt":0.4217828369696369,"score_spread":0.046615196125970926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167317498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47891358,0.0025324426,0.06598242,0.00971557,0.00006055263,0.0000735784,0.00017756924,0.000118649165,0.44242564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793732,0.00060355983,0.001867339,0.00029258092,0.00001880473,0.000036093534,0.000025533516,0.00001675986,0.017766193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995702,0.00010810052,0.000015269345,0.00007837122,0.000052280076,0.00017574044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991178,0.00029060026,0.00027468384,0.00010680253,0.00007273263,0.00013738222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006675972,0.00049843424,0.0008090907,0.00044859818,0.0016243174,0.0036644763,0.0009470851,0.0027511509,0.014626251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020476095,0.0004901187,0.0008130078,0.0007331539,0.0036895687,0.0073570865,0.002028299,0.0022635562,0.001007259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004993282,0.000027925169,0.0016968272,0.000032502692,0.00001122417,0.00029263587,0.0005446196,0.006876294,0.0003689101,0.985493,0.0005233501,0.004082785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010735752,0.0001524841,0.0073421756,0.00019143056,0.00008486242,0.0007930884,0.0022076769,0.04215825,0.0007277684,0.9127919,0.0333774,0.000065466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008178474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076882765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014626251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002754938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001305529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04892975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167467446","doi":"10.1017/s0008423909090349","title":"The Influence of Judicial Uncertainty on Executive Support for Negotiation in Canadian Land Claims Policy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Negotiation; Indigenous; Shadow (psychology); Context (archaeology); Politics; Public administration; Law; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.018514575867641218,"score_gpt":0.25016678129587716,"score_spread":0.23165220542823595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167467446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8971116,0.0006124566,0.0007616097,0.005693628,0.000026544674,0.00005594963,0.00015587965,0.000012382504,0.09556995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984835,0.0000852684,0.00006751077,0.00010888588,0.0000064995565,0.000004717497,0.000016538517,0.0000019515842,0.0012252015],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99037313,0.00179483,0.00032125623,0.00080633286,0.00364642,0.0030580466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95324224,0.028123165,0.0072856075,0.001135303,0.008006598,0.0022070745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009652519,0.00018248193,0.00038830575,0.0017694631,0.0079330765,0.008323257,0.0010895545,0.001366304,0.006702006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05900886,0.00024220166,0.00027414894,0.0019402186,0.0049145687,0.0014641979,0.001792812,0.0020860506,0.0002458247],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011109498,0.00033465913,0.5480561,0.00028587753,0.00029170242,0.0015700863,0.07231003,0.020694226,0.0035568771,0.2197486,0.014018967,0.118021935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009861874,0.00014784855,0.8253897,0.00031923197,0.00019248691,0.000114251554,0.08305283,0.01525567,0.0015626915,0.021955356,0.051702507,0.00020885353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9144266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9448002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9402483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059751667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0507478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4335307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168296144","doi":"10.7202/1005679ar","title":"L’économie de la preuve judiciaire","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06483767119437737,"score_gpt":0.228576825088337,"score_spread":0.1637391538939596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168296144","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1465674,0.008286307,0.5718667,0.028391927,0.00062538986,0.00033080138,0.0009837281,0.00030075258,0.24264714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8837708,0.006374972,0.026242083,0.0007862679,0.0006887623,0.0002610629,0.0002462821,0.00009265061,0.08153702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740064,0.00081032654,0.00009406265,0.0004166071,0.000884828,0.00039353975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937975,0.004294705,0.00057451637,0.0004808076,0.0005653187,0.00028713615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028326928,0.0008288256,0.001331857,0.0014497801,0.001696446,0.006815548,0.0019827168,0.004376567,0.017808475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012274956,0.0010754573,0.0014090006,0.0015119647,0.003670934,0.007119595,0.0024153234,0.0051397528,0.0020149902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029343364,0.0000514249,0.0016375632,0.00006728367,0.00002843785,0.00014567991,0.00026950578,0.04766436,0.00029893286,0.9404163,0.0017232243,0.007667961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005057809,0.000090753114,0.0029717963,0.000109396846,0.000039486167,0.000341945,0.0002185331,0.12273082,0.00039050804,0.8483788,0.024626782,0.000050711493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01202797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00806372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017808475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050577857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004726453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05957526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168699342","doi":"10.22201/iiec.20078951e.2001.126.7403","title":"Las funciones económicas del derecho","year":2009,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Problemas del Desarrollo Revista Latinoamericana de Economía","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canarie","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Humanities; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.025800728165023348,"score_gpt":0.2340130678782201,"score_spread":0.20821233971319675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168699342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18045606,0.008677368,0.09748373,0.019349918,0.0006192939,0.00019351034,0.0022071972,0.00027658447,0.69073635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.941438,0.0064704632,0.010540468,0.00068719237,0.0003089757,0.00022623496,0.000664532,0.00012941277,0.03953473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931891,0.0028293966,0.00030036533,0.0008423307,0.0021465106,0.0006923351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98719704,0.0065683895,0.0016826441,0.0010877817,0.002939132,0.0005250932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054886783,0.000946833,0.00054680783,0.0032550942,0.0016601433,0.012844162,0.001216308,0.0016712801,0.024288468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018905211,0.00038615745,0.00096003455,0.0049717026,0.0049571223,0.010017258,0.0037093915,0.0018347262,0.002160219],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036513124,0.000023805176,0.010720522,0.00015215702,0.00006734178,0.00009707794,0.0018927184,0.0027808866,0.0003132761,0.9552898,0.0029665264,0.025659496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002100326,0.00007631294,0.033493087,0.00071292,0.00016908676,0.00033210978,0.012639141,0.0071021584,0.0014285302,0.77712345,0.16679958,0.0001026478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007467546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005009098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024288468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004498256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038417482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08125305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168824075","doi":"10.7202/007821ar","title":"Regulating Conflict in Public Sector Labour Relations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Collective bargaining; Jurisdiction; Compulsory arbitration; Context (archaeology); Dispute resolution; Legislation; Labour economics; Legislature; Bargaining power; Economics; Business; Political science; Law; Microeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.06515050662463881,"score_gpt":0.2249029403285847,"score_spread":0.1597524337039459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168824075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9701985,0.0004635506,0.001639846,0.0009989792,0.00000598761,0.00006625813,0.00058565685,0.000013010842,0.026028153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903333,0.00008625602,0.00015706898,0.00001858616,0.000004655238,0.000017960632,0.0001017378,0.0000013523634,0.00057916204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955564,0.001357167,0.00020489647,0.00033807935,0.0012676992,0.0012757395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97936755,0.007419609,0.009187263,0.0009134743,0.002128826,0.000983308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036746957,0.00012781426,0.00039952566,0.0028322188,0.0034456404,0.0036376074,0.00071590586,0.00059300713,0.0041428152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025536934,0.00019978493,0.0001886436,0.0058650826,0.002887138,0.0015083746,0.0017671839,0.0006096666,0.00032246325],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036575756,0.00020822696,0.8573839,0.00014110196,0.0000659841,0.0004175111,0.020467829,0.00984167,0.00085455156,0.027902205,0.0047456864,0.07760557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048992548,0.00006978436,0.9375721,0.00008007784,0.000022668219,0.0001125887,0.02046395,0.006729586,0.0003854606,0.017722813,0.016769871,0.000022063388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45954117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5488615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45954117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018430773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010553386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9137327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170765381","doi":"","title":"Regulating Conflict in Public Sector Labour Relations","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Collective bargaining; Jurisdiction; Compulsory arbitration; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Dispute resolution; Labour economics; Economics; Legislature; Business; Public sector; Public interest; Political science; Law; Economy; Geography","score_opus":0.05832510832561237,"score_gpt":0.2181159975135565,"score_spread":0.15979088918794415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170765381","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20221664,0.00296787,0.012208258,0.05758708,0.00042827253,0.00013580127,0.00020456333,0.00011761355,0.724134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825289,0.0003969455,0.0004079862,0.0012262895,0.00020098462,0.00006267355,0.000027131784,0.000019911393,0.015129073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98926055,0.005374385,0.00052207074,0.00068802136,0.001996259,0.0021586786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97487324,0.011870214,0.005757096,0.0028980789,0.002824061,0.0017772409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008716422,0.00022259986,0.00037124968,0.0023306722,0.0059196604,0.011191162,0.0012578561,0.0034445438,0.018149992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03269262,0.00027880794,0.00033355947,0.0034297572,0.007649298,0.004780006,0.0070876917,0.0022432168,0.0023306734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018431684,0.00012812774,0.01099889,0.00016520574,0.000036969162,0.000318573,0.026611712,0.001468784,0.0010588267,0.8853426,0.01997528,0.053710774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013248289,0.00010812536,0.02313289,0.0005295489,0.000055560373,0.00020575768,0.032769285,0.002741524,0.001768043,0.6903335,0.2481773,0.000046063717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072348253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009144995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018149992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007106656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010047355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06071782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171182911","doi":"10.7202/043505ar","title":"The effect of allowing motorists to opt out of tort law in the United States","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Inflation (cosmology); Law; Tort reform; Fault (geology); Economics; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Liability","score_opus":0.01007808544753518,"score_gpt":0.2108594208019827,"score_spread":0.2007813353544475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171182911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8657479,0.0020567547,0.0010662447,0.051275678,0.00051273586,0.00006240887,0.0014793588,0.00013537504,0.07766355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98475075,0.00076729583,0.00032069886,0.007620801,0.00016329288,0.000023874229,0.0003158983,0.0000073850797,0.0060300706],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997109,0.0010899124,0.00012052551,0.0003912739,0.0004928707,0.00079654594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892937,0.004657955,0.0030203315,0.0005782899,0.0009283237,0.0015213237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003844384,0.00025271505,0.00048011114,0.0007566549,0.002126015,0.0044773277,0.00080225134,0.0032787886,0.0064641726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015637219,0.00039635465,0.00052375026,0.0010265064,0.002276958,0.0018093066,0.0016708759,0.0031091487,0.000530534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00229147,0.0025928887,0.29874384,0.0003346611,0.00050736725,0.0014239043,0.0025294984,0.044566084,0.0017471265,0.27568197,0.256673,0.11290815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001548238,0.0020858827,0.6504013,0.00054834416,0.0012272134,0.0005139724,0.010041336,0.032578338,0.003775643,0.13278024,0.16419822,0.00030132438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17209515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22232154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17209515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047202283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005959699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34218687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179016219","doi":"10.1007/s10657-015-9520-1","title":"On the efficiency of the common law: an application to the recovery of rewards","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Law and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Economics; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.03844446491868622,"score_gpt":0.21131458748268891,"score_spread":0.1728701225640027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179016219","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049756102,0.007599889,0.77855533,0.038632385,0.00077378785,0.00032481313,0.00032176057,0.0002220672,0.12381383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88292706,0.0073824865,0.07469824,0.004189879,0.002719001,0.0004947977,0.0001497457,0.0003410275,0.027097777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.987171,0.007783766,0.0005167435,0.0016722168,0.0017708621,0.0010854804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8732648,0.11134424,0.0037281327,0.0063245962,0.0041264836,0.0012117588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026383089,0.0016435769,0.004824245,0.0036844416,0.0032212515,0.006251663,0.004606213,0.008740012,0.01617919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.122776255,0.0011179545,0.0043304637,0.004961859,0.020014675,0.019547349,0.007126167,0.011318535,0.001036693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021053449,0.000024589059,0.00023498236,0.00004090826,0.000031350526,0.00005388388,0.00011613782,0.0068633417,0.000054491702,0.9862781,0.0016554777,0.004625672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002443218,0.000017306202,0.00020515405,0.000039495575,0.000023025814,0.000033826782,0.000065294305,0.01885472,0.00007711678,0.9789058,0.001735653,0.000018142071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009000463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047800355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026383089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007896858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070427763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13952875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2189171579","doi":"10.53386/nilq.v53i4.710","title":"Private partners and public good","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Business; Public relations; Political science","score_opus":0.027547148222121044,"score_gpt":0.20997427209181233,"score_spread":0.1824271238696913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2189171579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020246985,0.0048024375,0.0001747042,0.038366716,0.0040695556,0.000060447135,0.0013949703,0.00010173141,0.94900477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053316068,0.004206134,0.00026975048,0.034323696,0.0021978053,0.0002528784,0.0011852592,0.00011800517,0.90413034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855417,0.00020076576,0.00007339543,0.00026509952,0.0004579937,0.00044857667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99582064,0.0010850744,0.00023725588,0.0007573812,0.0015457429,0.0005538272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017318826,0.0003877357,0.00065221894,0.0015542404,0.004548572,0.007505457,0.00096014654,0.004744362,0.19967194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065117893,0.0003403604,0.0005955367,0.0013035472,0.0022512346,0.0040772106,0.0022132043,0.003179948,0.053845152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011574343,0.000046334364,0.0010702088,0.00022188295,0.000010563579,0.000089603,0.0001727863,0.000094787945,0.00015365791,0.08820577,0.8848288,0.024989923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002816488,0.000012946908,0.0039527626,0.00053224986,0.000009797934,0.000034226596,0.00041018994,0.000087102126,0.00014139203,0.008182714,0.9865928,0.000015540438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09006446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16430737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19967194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054518157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007137945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66796917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197948142","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2617","title":"Book Notes: Reconstructing Contracts, by Douglas G. Baird","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01972577059564751,"score_gpt":0.1963853901237424,"score_spread":0.1766596195280949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197948142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033111337,0.32941058,0.039044484,0.2695094,0.018988056,0.00006170106,0.003614646,0.00049944775,0.33556053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08665547,0.23454283,0.047708027,0.028692296,0.016238598,0.00012593201,0.0031318318,0.0011776821,0.5817274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996555,0.00010658135,0.000020102925,0.000081469276,0.00011351575,0.000022728062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986986,0.0007747145,0.000060827613,0.00013254485,0.00025479126,0.000078520716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010867164,0.0007017483,0.00038141606,0.0025097413,0.0020372556,0.003484525,0.0007346036,0.0019150523,0.031974897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005410288,0.0005733157,0.0003274388,0.0046789413,0.0035846482,0.007674981,0.0009922378,0.003407744,0.007957334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014950489,0.000010210313,0.00021853461,0.000051804298,0.00000504535,0.000021208196,0.00018902299,0.0004489831,0.0000585834,0.14915763,0.8126632,0.037160806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008214261,0.0000063571883,0.0006290619,0.00022045603,0.000004597231,0.000056719062,0.00023186077,0.00037277903,0.00014874198,0.21173367,0.78657097,0.000016501215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02916921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05415773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031974897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031431154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021087946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106966615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201269917","doi":"10.1111/iere.12212","title":"INFORMATION, RISK SHARING, AND INCENTIVES IN AGENCY PROBLEMS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Economic Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Incentive; Principal (computer security); Agency (philosophy); Microeconomics; Ranking (information retrieval); Principal–agent problem; Contractible space; Order (exchange); Perfect information; Moral hazard; Risk neutral; Information asymmetry; Information sharing; Economics; Imperfect; Actuarial science; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Finance; Computer security; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03438700286925761,"score_gpt":0.259549319091828,"score_spread":0.22516231622257038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201269917","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09080115,0.038640574,0.6150202,0.035019506,0.0007695985,0.00028144557,0.0003029739,0.000092311006,0.21907224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9360868,0.014576468,0.040383592,0.0008002891,0.0011539484,0.00025482045,0.000081287515,0.000026073187,0.006636734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.981545,0.012152116,0.0010243965,0.0011328178,0.0028364926,0.0013091445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9559968,0.036519095,0.0034449885,0.0016906253,0.0017085779,0.00063998817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014765728,0.001092639,0.0018775316,0.0026067088,0.0025954342,0.0072839144,0.0012922236,0.004724612,0.0037018217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030209599,0.00072384556,0.0013548229,0.0035196033,0.012123967,0.009155484,0.0025228648,0.004360129,0.00033198463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007912872,0.000013985664,0.00012892464,0.000055704208,0.00001507117,0.000028098284,0.00009330844,0.0047106333,0.000030640367,0.9910823,0.00035911446,0.0034743706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001159307,0.000008508388,0.000087516884,0.000036092555,0.0000066672897,0.000019578507,0.000042055024,0.0042437688,0.000031288786,0.99389774,0.0016069564,0.000008254246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002190976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013930511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014765728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005322157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044532456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078089535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202539245","doi":"10.4337/9781781000151.00014","title":"The optimal amount of distorted testimony when the arbiter can and cannot commit","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Arbiter; Commit; Adjudication; Political science; Computer science; Law and economics; Computer security; Economics; Law; Computer network","score_opus":0.026672690816369495,"score_gpt":0.18659530316658335,"score_spread":0.15992261235021385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202539245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12187864,0.007528146,0.231953,0.04132894,0.0012361049,0.000543153,0.0008569233,0.0004160247,0.59425914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92856807,0.002139314,0.0470088,0.001645838,0.00053483626,0.000275659,0.0001428516,0.00009643274,0.019588215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99036777,0.0042206007,0.0005795427,0.0011271614,0.0025772974,0.0011276657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750454,0.017565819,0.0016441497,0.0029154299,0.0017028792,0.0011264053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009447395,0.00071835006,0.0012287608,0.0015341509,0.0015139031,0.005434446,0.0020617612,0.00407795,0.014098858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06214871,0.00080633257,0.00039929853,0.000868079,0.0046932152,0.0077410126,0.0037732334,0.0036625164,0.0022013644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005817264,0.00011406274,0.0007316335,0.00023537898,0.000049657927,0.00035741742,0.00039879602,0.014818031,0.0023266948,0.8823432,0.007693944,0.09034953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014786153,0.00014142618,0.0011097835,0.0004569411,0.00006534128,0.0004532695,0.00079469837,0.020573286,0.0026487508,0.96002257,0.013527723,0.00005824235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011400362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016536139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014098858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033547555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003889382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049963176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204575813","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1014","title":"The Challenge of Defining Unmet Legal Need","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.034148207418026696,"score_gpt":0.2634158331042794,"score_spread":0.2292676256862527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2204575813","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059296742,0.023668323,0.019268792,0.58505666,0.0018298359,0.00022828515,0.0006258844,0.000082003215,0.30994347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8965717,0.017244898,0.015417931,0.04507439,0.0022247718,0.0005625037,0.00048413637,0.0001233688,0.022296242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812935,0.009192622,0.0015025204,0.0016894563,0.0041869036,0.0021350353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94047433,0.030092072,0.007431757,0.0027602296,0.013694779,0.0055468827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024139037,0.0004926261,0.0012228383,0.009720284,0.007122916,0.014415982,0.0036397302,0.006542298,0.012683847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063383356,0.0005978665,0.00058619573,0.006848634,0.024359405,0.026870979,0.013380965,0.009284306,0.0012746037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016950487,0.000039194867,0.005580546,0.0004573087,0.000014798782,0.00028979458,0.021275895,0.00042239443,0.00009023589,0.9028049,0.01921574,0.049792223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014987721,0.00006106973,0.009678439,0.003231789,0.000023119319,0.0007876424,0.07330235,0.0013287151,0.0001428265,0.6955414,0.21581103,0.00007664654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03301476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058765937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03301476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016474856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04386331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12766093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2208454191","doi":"","title":"Regulating Judgment-Proof Firms: Information or Extended Liability?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Business; Action (physics); Quality (philosophy); Information asymmetry; Limited liability; Information quality; Actuarial science; Public economics; Economics; Finance; Information system; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01707184974603444,"score_gpt":0.2217060198097939,"score_spread":0.20463417006375947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2208454191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4918406,0.0046744705,0.28159368,0.04804436,0.00034861086,0.0003463353,0.00022585728,0.000304221,0.17262185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99303573,0.00038400022,0.002962089,0.0012605276,0.000115337476,0.000034749824,0.000009402261,0.000005767303,0.0021924677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908798,0.003475634,0.00038584412,0.0012672339,0.0019966073,0.0019949845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96294147,0.022447813,0.008489179,0.0036996696,0.0014032436,0.0010185931],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009088919,0.0003310917,0.00087531336,0.00053724594,0.0011422754,0.0046955836,0.0017036622,0.005296084,0.0040230057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035592224,0.00038244264,0.00072417984,0.0004896482,0.008489027,0.0067872214,0.0022784404,0.0036562488,0.00035812412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009565246,0.00013152814,0.0021490126,0.00010983061,0.00004849863,0.00036379765,0.0006262659,0.013837163,0.0013631834,0.9637952,0.0019730853,0.015506829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015890169,0.00019967798,0.0020491725,0.00011492498,0.000051362207,0.00023252265,0.00034588977,0.017117292,0.0016338006,0.9682004,0.0098347245,0.00006124541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00224445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016422363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009088919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024948854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028840345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04806739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212550521","doi":"","title":"Statutory Duty of Safety Care to Subcontractors: U.S., Canadian & U.K. Perspectives","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Professional safety","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Duty of care; Duty; Business; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.027953508278085307,"score_gpt":0.24406497011324169,"score_spread":0.2161114618351564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212550521","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019806312,0.049699016,0.0010999686,0.663922,0.0025193326,0.00004488068,0.0010698956,0.000047118683,0.26179144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5807644,0.09242132,0.0025788029,0.26562837,0.004655611,0.00006075594,0.00090002234,0.00007073751,0.052919984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897349,0.0011194097,0.00032009048,0.00081550976,0.0041027297,0.003907383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98352087,0.0032495765,0.0008677375,0.00029136668,0.0095190145,0.002551403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009442509,0.0005907994,0.0006618144,0.0058492785,0.012131166,0.013091524,0.004841576,0.0144325495,0.009235373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013958165,0.0004969631,0.0013558123,0.0049523474,0.015409699,0.004108306,0.0028068894,0.011481649,0.00074417755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051040508,0.0000712602,0.004596955,0.00019882154,0.000024776098,0.0002889774,0.0031064015,0.0008011342,0.00034136118,0.7958086,0.16415533,0.030555418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006789436,0.00009299009,0.042353205,0.0038715457,0.00016506396,0.00040276157,0.014004817,0.0015355538,0.00048106821,0.10908666,0.8276914,0.00024711213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9819817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9877902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13066453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13066453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22502549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9480419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2214060783","doi":"","title":"Rule by Law in Company","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Corporate governance; Corporate law; Business; State (computer science); Key (lock); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Finance; Computer security","score_opus":0.0451979035945553,"score_gpt":0.273335706574616,"score_spread":0.22813780298006067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2214060783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004346828,0.006845299,0.007183143,0.043572806,0.0020166,0.000068496345,0.000070006434,0.000078340185,0.9358183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5623281,0.0069186264,0.004905073,0.05634541,0.0047105625,0.00025919548,0.00019434703,0.00022205524,0.36411676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909053,0.0029389705,0.0005280653,0.0021431106,0.002181264,0.0013032638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937476,0.0027094344,0.00047522044,0.00094585196,0.0013787905,0.00074302254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063443845,0.00045412345,0.0005104632,0.0009344109,0.008781171,0.016325312,0.0009205465,0.009342672,0.014115525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0124651985,0.00040666029,0.00040136298,0.0010998809,0.027228784,0.010489409,0.004399463,0.009615216,0.003223687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024452793,0.0000049703763,0.00010881016,0.000009046261,0.0000014194213,0.000036903697,0.0007694061,0.000044427157,0.000024927223,0.9766788,0.018180788,0.0041380683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008439114,0.000017253265,0.0004028703,0.0001742548,0.000004388488,0.00010899648,0.0008049883,0.00019360638,0.0001445323,0.37429315,0.62382674,0.000020732588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017602906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013978334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017602906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074951495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008074837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05438137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2214873032","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1355","title":"Book Notes: Law in a Market Economy, by Robin Paul Malloy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Economics; Sociology; Law; Mathematical economics; Political science","score_opus":0.015395840194333278,"score_gpt":0.19973467868427164,"score_spread":0.18433883848993837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2214873032","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006773225,0.19777839,0.0031267863,0.49844214,0.023513256,0.00005546001,0.00093891384,0.00024447884,0.2752233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011409362,0.08139318,0.0024616586,0.08059765,0.026535133,0.00010599448,0.0005059398,0.00030913917,0.796682],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948287,0.00013398274,0.000029355466,0.00009075605,0.0002283061,0.000034759523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748623,0.0013374304,0.00011996951,0.00014113032,0.00070659537,0.00020862005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011070373,0.00071338186,0.0007054725,0.002179878,0.0023341584,0.0045171264,0.0011210083,0.004635239,0.04129267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066294717,0.0005078154,0.00030789038,0.0029490215,0.003356347,0.007328087,0.0014228284,0.0058319904,0.015395867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028474487,0.000004968928,0.000027888944,0.000017349648,8.7234815e-7,0.0000056176395,0.000041299932,0.000041322193,0.000010682675,0.028292345,0.96577936,0.005775473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006944802,0.0000045231127,0.0002402535,0.00013067141,0.0000025839304,0.000020519097,0.00012806483,0.00009710767,0.000034147637,0.0447885,0.9545386,0.000008241856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03813818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07100695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04129267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038305195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034356476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13813776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217921825","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1035","title":"Book Review: A Note Concerning: \"When Old Meets New\": Civil Remedies in the Criminal Context, a Paper by J. P. Laporte, D. Sean McGarrity and Jamie Nelson","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Criminology; Law; Sociology; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03868620263210288,"score_gpt":0.26764720297669015,"score_spread":0.22896100034458727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217921825","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002425105,0.44193143,0.00065907923,0.35347986,0.15250824,0.000062527695,0.00079464994,0.00015998985,0.050161723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048970724,0.43334842,0.0012428641,0.201751,0.1477997,0.00016422602,0.0009259892,0.00028074667,0.20959003],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972126,0.00044300372,0.00020994018,0.00027289416,0.001717748,0.00014379947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760006,0.011474909,0.0012037506,0.00045862267,0.010019854,0.0008422914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026782982,0.0008255375,0.0019634846,0.0038280494,0.0019415377,0.0067860936,0.0023882065,0.007826964,0.026338166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021733826,0.0006214503,0.00074080104,0.0072535733,0.0019475373,0.004850422,0.0012462462,0.0069598006,0.024755856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017428921,0.000001912118,0.000016774959,0.00009176385,0.0000018896374,0.000006333445,0.00000769686,0.00001986839,0.000008427863,0.00066280446,0.99241793,0.006762788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048318307,0.0000060468137,0.00025221036,0.0006566391,0.0000076104006,0.000047105284,0.000028149558,0.000043629418,0.000027345222,0.0011539,0.9977622,0.000010290943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021910347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06706524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026338166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005923972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00958615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08810991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220322025","doi":"10.7574/cjicl.04.01.88","title":"The Specific Direction Requirement for Aidingand Abetting: A Call for Revisiting ComparativeCriminal Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"Danmarks Grundforskningsfond; National Research Foundation","keywords":"Law; International law; Political science; Comparative law; Commercial law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.16523659358527915,"score_gpt":0.30297813231498233,"score_spread":0.13774153872970318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220322025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022854652,0.025826948,0.032478932,0.18613248,0.002981665,0.00007142783,0.000088756984,0.00007677066,0.7294883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8910983,0.008729166,0.01588783,0.04831242,0.0033462485,0.00027704876,0.00010933508,0.00016629863,0.032073326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895752,0.0052685933,0.00047739744,0.0016547949,0.0018096832,0.0012142747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896422,0.006112057,0.00073722174,0.0014540984,0.0015023253,0.0005520922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017996173,0.0005449277,0.0010692603,0.0024228722,0.009203603,0.01440235,0.0041041975,0.011956607,0.007651929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014995324,0.0005782477,0.0013429367,0.0021376263,0.0596726,0.021848297,0.007773593,0.018721951,0.0006697435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014123925,0.0000043270925,0.00004957629,0.000009355768,8.496945e-7,0.000019681418,0.00051960285,0.000018482968,0.000015771027,0.9977718,0.0007173344,0.00087185943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016942238,0.000027569684,0.0005003824,0.00034789962,0.000010889311,0.00013432566,0.002369792,0.0002223171,0.00014622732,0.784617,0.21158458,0.00002208454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0139847305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020052595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017996173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015087273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008252664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109466374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222824569","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1371","title":"The Complex Context of Contract Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Business; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.04260854658905719,"score_gpt":0.22501921808419537,"score_spread":0.18241067149513818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222824569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07091145,0.021482324,0.11426349,0.120763406,0.0007041404,0.00007981729,0.00054727745,0.00012774512,0.67112035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97135264,0.0036487293,0.008147866,0.0025916903,0.0008175564,0.000095476025,0.0000831966,0.000058655376,0.013204252],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960211,0.0023795937,0.00010150866,0.0004912295,0.0007008273,0.0003058679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896578,0.007705955,0.00053209485,0.0009193753,0.0006030195,0.0005818266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041421917,0.00039712182,0.00081429677,0.0022918666,0.00521383,0.013034347,0.00122967,0.00475201,0.011536912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014497378,0.00061938155,0.00048296203,0.0031651077,0.023523627,0.01528381,0.0030048445,0.0053710802,0.000846909],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010305594,0.0000017541929,0.000034129655,0.000003286638,8.372502e-7,0.000011230855,0.00015020186,0.00011696761,0.0000072292005,0.9986613,0.00059884245,0.0004131944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021479366,0.0000011447188,0.000079039964,0.000009753354,0.0000010669199,0.000016745746,0.00015634623,0.00038109272,0.000007212848,0.99235207,0.006990896,0.0000023739558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006829228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064589344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013034347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056947405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030616596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041318476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2223833657","doi":"10.29173/alr406","title":"Honour Among Businesspeople: The Duty of Good Faith and Contracts in the Energy Sector","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Supreme court; Good faith; Honour; Faith; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Business; Theology","score_opus":0.019248066769257458,"score_gpt":0.19772531048847788,"score_spread":0.1784772437192204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2223833657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09604642,0.034481354,0.0070143268,0.1918014,0.0006416584,0.000075864504,0.00010760014,0.000036090372,0.6697952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93689996,0.007461849,0.0008102623,0.016916702,0.00027160763,0.000017027945,0.000024129824,0.000022448568,0.037575945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906256,0.0030998967,0.00022265915,0.00067806797,0.0030348673,0.0023389028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98636,0.008336492,0.0008530524,0.00062976603,0.002520583,0.0013000724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009769035,0.00016357104,0.00032782892,0.001780143,0.015027849,0.0122075975,0.0017575216,0.0078053614,0.004050256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018423654,0.00040510102,0.00028811488,0.002632226,0.038314242,0.0052476157,0.00348237,0.009053168,0.00030328668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041029275,0.0000066206553,0.00061072956,0.0000112648,0.000001948475,0.00013534808,0.0027666688,0.000092845046,0.000040612555,0.9854591,0.0055098343,0.0053609526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002606657,0.000033133623,0.014852371,0.0007570404,0.000028472132,0.000330929,0.021010378,0.0010495239,0.00038973076,0.512367,0.44904107,0.000114343755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7791726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8559397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7791726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04263057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06205514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44425577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224367999","doi":"","title":"מירנדה, קולינס ויששכרוב - על הפער בין הרצוי לבין המצוי בהלכת יששכרוב (Miranda, Collins and Issacharov: The Gap between the Ideal and the Real in the Issacharov Ruling)","year":2007,"lang":"he","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Voluntariness; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Doctrine; Context (archaeology); Judicial interpretation; Charter; Admissible evidence; Exclusionary rule; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.020201406390055916,"score_gpt":0.23277236861673964,"score_spread":0.21257096222668373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224367999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03365794,0.034906466,0.003281039,0.16997159,0.0016464188,0.000034837256,0.00011328715,0.000034274624,0.7563542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9219124,0.0042055254,0.0010884936,0.012318667,0.0010127345,0.000078826975,0.000040209386,0.000035971934,0.059307244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975514,0.0012645653,0.000054284093,0.00028096585,0.0003807084,0.00046816905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880135,0.00075447845,0.00012412583,0.00006823142,0.00015219762,0.00009965728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025493926,0.00048887753,0.00043108646,0.0009498893,0.009147109,0.010131454,0.0008379794,0.005984609,0.0043799467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039052668,0.00030334914,0.0004876421,0.001030729,0.025948908,0.0051132245,0.002972331,0.00646567,0.0007240208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008891673,0.000006530362,0.00016235634,0.000017608703,0.0000017613684,0.000042046362,0.0053391424,0.000049273716,0.000019566021,0.9820047,0.010289234,0.0020589402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026323738,0.000017480757,0.0011492628,0.00028391692,0.000007262815,0.00007711952,0.006887871,0.00015511001,0.000171643,0.78369486,0.20750907,0.000020112459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016950544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0238884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016950544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006584798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00462751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047776222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227452297","doi":"","title":"L'indétermination et l'interprétation chez les positivistes analytiques: un échange avec Austin, Kelsen, Hart et ...Dworkin (Indeterminacy and Interpretation by Analytical Positivists: An Exchange with Austin, Kelsen, Hart and...Dworkin)","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011654345919590393,"score_gpt":0.24781998758923698,"score_spread":0.2361656416696466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227452297","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014418368,0.17768823,0.03203417,0.6311532,0.0045013274,0.000040429597,0.00015382143,0.0000860486,0.13992435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72568846,0.11314509,0.020594591,0.058490284,0.0131616015,0.0003240331,0.00016052386,0.00048686433,0.06794849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98999757,0.0074668163,0.00018684966,0.0007533055,0.0011028993,0.0004925505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867993,0.010797263,0.00063265004,0.00065345375,0.0008353211,0.00028203154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010237711,0.0009690099,0.0010110977,0.0020619887,0.008563462,0.019368438,0.001391973,0.0051984964,0.005313372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0102806715,0.0007288363,0.0007363233,0.0053266697,0.04806472,0.022281973,0.004631285,0.0117754955,0.00075032614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014597587,0.0000067707024,0.00010936764,0.000042026237,0.0000035752735,0.000037787075,0.008103942,0.000076215605,0.000047980415,0.97416764,0.0133378245,0.004052299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001377114,0.000010756033,0.00034366647,0.0003020133,0.000005666177,0.00007020172,0.009561032,0.0003256084,0.00011766401,0.7786736,0.21055014,0.000025844321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020385168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018810032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020385168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01642358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007420421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11916196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230724656","doi":"","title":"L'Évaluation Du Manque À Gagner Du Demandeur Adulte: Comment Les Tribunaux Canadiens Assument-Ils Leur Rôle De Devin? (Evaluating the Plaintiff's Loss of Earnings: How Canadian Courts Assume the Role of Psychic)","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Unjust enrichment; Political science; Prejudice (legal term); Common law; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Restitution","score_opus":0.020968247225346143,"score_gpt":0.22527804383197628,"score_spread":0.20430979660663012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230724656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41364965,0.012632297,0.0019114664,0.08651985,0.0009319146,0.00029754278,0.0005803613,0.00004581308,0.48343113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9034016,0.0051776087,0.0010468193,0.004884457,0.00014035577,0.000046648187,0.00010958359,0.000017031552,0.08517597],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99334806,0.0010195404,0.0002171058,0.00024497174,0.0035201074,0.0016501715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914302,0.0012111142,0.00061978115,0.00013909761,0.005759536,0.0008403271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005726208,0.00032820294,0.0002447872,0.0018311283,0.008773094,0.0067676897,0.0012677967,0.002351288,0.009276213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013113678,0.00014022704,0.00038912985,0.0018944326,0.0050548157,0.001525065,0.0021848516,0.0020968164,0.0005948293],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028430665,0.00014621599,0.14898832,0.00062661944,0.0000804908,0.003638188,0.15842094,0.0012821617,0.0026095514,0.26955628,0.1353296,0.2790374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034846074,0.00030388834,0.24652606,0.0013418768,0.00016966966,0.0012192454,0.24332805,0.00074135413,0.002520324,0.0101319505,0.49350402,0.00017878473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8958684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9582809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10413158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0368453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051092945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2673326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2233886405","doi":"","title":"Legal Ethics and Regulatory Legitimacy: Regulating Lawyers for Personal Misconduct","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Misconduct; Political science; Law and economics; Sanctions; Reputation; Incentive; Normative; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.033588734319258344,"score_gpt":0.24724315825815185,"score_spread":0.2136544239388935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2233886405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0932807,0.0055320594,0.07034206,0.37501624,0.00083355454,0.00015584489,0.000052804695,0.00019509252,0.4545916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689171,0.0011051368,0.0053929607,0.016492179,0.0006323783,0.00016642147,0.000013955802,0.000038765196,0.0072410833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9488343,0.028386673,0.001776006,0.0049609332,0.01270183,0.0033402913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8483393,0.10719991,0.015091799,0.0100427605,0.015253317,0.0040728627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041928638,0.00040590274,0.0007442573,0.002630628,0.006107117,0.011695275,0.0024648234,0.016327815,0.0043497817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.109322734,0.0006226241,0.00066501397,0.0011938807,0.061066184,0.010914154,0.005565864,0.010004262,0.0007775857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013058111,0.000042036885,0.0014590854,0.000034486453,0.000010590566,0.000060375023,0.0020130721,0.00038961982,0.00019538724,0.98628044,0.0017470985,0.0077546583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000452292,0.000043962784,0.0020286478,0.00021150932,0.000021819702,0.000112425,0.0009328212,0.0014917625,0.0005661063,0.966506,0.028000206,0.000039459614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048586554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038621416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041928638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007084779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016528387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22174245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240934958","doi":"","title":"Homo Legislativus: Missing Link in the Evolution of 'Behaviour Modification'?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Legislation; Political science; Legislature; Mandate; Law and economics; Arbitration; Law; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.041522551257645486,"score_gpt":0.2258546948165784,"score_spread":0.18433214355893293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240934958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63759553,0.0016703972,0.025363976,0.014547757,0.00013588421,0.000068479974,0.000088025765,0.00017319049,0.32035664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912493,0.00027081172,0.0025891839,0.00074093085,0.000012488586,0.000018304954,0.000022295439,0.00004017759,0.005056465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759066,0.00093555247,0.000042143343,0.0004849284,0.00042434465,0.0005224902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982875,0.00051300146,0.00032510734,0.00041573017,0.00018431702,0.0002742983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033987213,0.00018905885,0.0002779117,0.00060370215,0.002549121,0.002143132,0.000931865,0.0016671885,0.0040283264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004411753,0.0002652088,0.00021389652,0.00042561936,0.021439198,0.0019194895,0.0021013252,0.0019593942,0.0003070555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006664497,0.00009463529,0.03130288,0.00007277992,0.000033959936,0.00053832826,0.048371915,0.00094149855,0.005422993,0.8500887,0.0019841716,0.06108153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039082202,0.00034381336,0.1860516,0.0002904452,0.000067128865,0.0026040245,0.031655546,0.007934267,0.0046973373,0.54859316,0.21744548,0.00027813288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027529106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031356364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027529106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003543901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002551564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054737747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2244641405","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2317319","title":"The Role of Social Image Concerns in the Design of Legal Regimes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Image (mathematics); Law and economics; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.014168348296357132,"score_gpt":0.2098462956869128,"score_spread":0.19567794739055566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2244641405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52375984,0.00037395314,0.04914736,0.012057224,0.00016764851,0.00014942541,0.00005723821,0.000057669535,0.41422963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99625945,0.00004343817,0.0019327519,0.00020891822,0.000030526244,0.00001785852,0.000007022898,0.000019380916,0.0014807153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953269,0.0026268982,0.00013353792,0.0004042272,0.00095095864,0.0005575564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98082215,0.011126201,0.0029741796,0.0011259747,0.0021261533,0.001825392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058119833,0.00023391716,0.00026505714,0.0012007379,0.0027715785,0.0062136995,0.0009770767,0.0019366236,0.009630095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033542737,0.0003209968,0.00034160248,0.0005450306,0.0083820345,0.0042626467,0.0020357284,0.002031421,0.0005272354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019379162,0.0002388889,0.0219385,0.00008578155,0.000036606096,0.00027894045,0.008965847,0.001644493,0.0018715296,0.92042124,0.0019293608,0.04239507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009682469,0.00027029097,0.047177207,0.00014419574,0.000071421084,0.00029059863,0.011105899,0.01245606,0.0027827465,0.90599984,0.019553121,0.000051673433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020888885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035894983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009630095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030123836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021395793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032215834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245194067","doi":"","title":"Fortuity Victims and the Compensation Gap: Re-Envisioning Liability Insurance Coverage for Intentional and Criminal Conduct","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Collateral; Liability; Context (archaeology); Business; Accident (philosophy); Actuarial science; Tort; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.04754127552926888,"score_gpt":0.22550686807164075,"score_spread":0.17796559254237188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245194067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2896356,0.015896423,0.114679575,0.15392502,0.00088322605,0.00008741054,0.00011427042,0.00011567718,0.4246628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866458,0.0011261761,0.0034572824,0.0020154892,0.00018431876,0.000030185092,0.0000114378745,0.000014706438,0.006514455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970591,0.0016491585,0.00007276705,0.00021958622,0.0005701476,0.00042931805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975914,0.0015009711,0.00027095212,0.00021386746,0.00021339214,0.00020950181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057521225,0.00046637366,0.0003401343,0.0019378213,0.0033272475,0.010673704,0.0020753646,0.0060593253,0.0027369433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059253764,0.00036054966,0.000509117,0.0008049131,0.032118358,0.012521557,0.0051168813,0.006708879,0.00018820111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032184514,0.0000032993028,0.00013018909,0.0000030574236,6.1812597e-7,0.000038176437,0.0014374087,0.00034701396,0.000015651032,0.9966203,0.00024226382,0.0011588061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000085755155,0.000014929785,0.0004076776,0.00013667722,0.000007230011,0.00007793451,0.0029618277,0.0026255809,0.00010667675,0.97644186,0.017196449,0.0000145608965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009429949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009758003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010673704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070897187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057600993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051439762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2245439643","doi":"","title":"Let’s Work it Out (or We’ll See You in Court…) - Litigation and Private Dispute Resolution in Vertical Exchange Relationships","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Leverage (statistics); Perspective (graphical); Corporate governance; Shadow (psychology); Business; Litigation risk analysis; Law and economics; Private information retrieval; Dispute mechanism; Information asymmetry; Alternative dispute resolution; Political science; Economics; Law; Audit; Accounting; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.13012623719697103,"score_gpt":0.29307599652624555,"score_spread":0.16294975932927452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2245439643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90485173,0.0008138303,0.013794675,0.007271394,0.000034664994,0.00006187723,0.000047324254,0.000012335019,0.073112175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99735665,0.00015711252,0.00050565164,0.00014252003,0.000018811772,0.000014012838,0.0000111534,0.0000024335154,0.001791697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481034,0.0030938075,0.0002796733,0.00038093858,0.00066900364,0.0007662444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680085,0.017627005,0.010750347,0.0011537003,0.0010805404,0.001379823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050985822,0.00013438208,0.00027525943,0.0009577564,0.00303556,0.006892598,0.00058170734,0.0021958046,0.012993996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021651303,0.00017317898,0.0003820023,0.0009799056,0.004944799,0.0076608234,0.0025158094,0.0018904147,0.0009502346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004073123,0.0012033925,0.14211625,0.00029174023,0.000103343395,0.0015276246,0.03350762,0.006830721,0.0029573895,0.7196028,0.0030303525,0.08842149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019752009,0.0008594156,0.16950072,0.0005322333,0.00013440893,0.0023827597,0.07411697,0.019199558,0.0034455888,0.6928229,0.036673293,0.0001346098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020999669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018158054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012993996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018793377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011950117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04346925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2252352222","doi":"","title":"Public Funding of Multi-Party Litigation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Legal action; Limiting; Commission; Business; Public interest; Public funding; Action (physics); Public administration; Finance; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.04373695677922257,"score_gpt":0.22853802038619117,"score_spread":0.1848010636069686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2252352222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74036974,0.0038019049,0.009495879,0.017667428,0.00020443859,0.0002706036,0.00028436145,0.00026942062,0.22763623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928141,0.00031186204,0.00033352114,0.00018002586,0.00009326961,0.00003507973,0.00003567214,0.0000061640835,0.0061902935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885936,0.0034571192,0.00035536828,0.00059714663,0.0033846926,0.0036122417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9560459,0.02457239,0.009698029,0.0034190377,0.003169206,0.0030955153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072850934,0.00021341657,0.0004547243,0.0026485212,0.0034484053,0.0063430765,0.0014809755,0.0032983487,0.014056012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029122533,0.00036492443,0.00043988673,0.0017769489,0.002600442,0.0034603376,0.005699424,0.0019673917,0.0008527141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009318282,0.0014896638,0.10955746,0.0007373287,0.0002420668,0.00703867,0.011187382,0.014102328,0.0029043267,0.5907179,0.03163275,0.22945835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009073581,0.0019969922,0.3543542,0.0011192202,0.00038084885,0.0072422177,0.022717416,0.046187535,0.0062735225,0.1960388,0.3625617,0.00022023478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009869039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012777874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014056012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007639484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008827594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055428565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253183109","doi":"10.1522/revueot.v17n2.469","title":"L' évolution du contrat en droit québécois : instrument d’équité entre partenaires sociaux, entre organisations? À quelles conditions?","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Organisations & territoires","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.019177232914229392,"score_gpt":0.20398786220491197,"score_spread":0.18481062929068257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253183109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68931186,0.0038185108,0.025098976,0.0218114,0.0003714645,0.00007359186,0.0032032686,0.00014695516,0.256164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9214339,0.0004917255,0.0036974214,0.0004707895,0.00004583344,0.000024395942,0.0005529351,0.00007169156,0.07321129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970818,0.0007197198,0.000096929914,0.00059121713,0.0010475287,0.0004628318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99184555,0.0021498676,0.0010799179,0.0005692354,0.003871196,0.00048430898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032045236,0.0005941726,0.0007869585,0.001998656,0.0035002918,0.010493437,0.0017883955,0.0026554845,0.023828577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011195231,0.00041931542,0.0007600641,0.0030417875,0.0037836975,0.0043088864,0.0012732471,0.0034881153,0.0011091628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021118103,0.00014011735,0.13642785,0.0001039024,0.00037194436,0.00040989218,0.008439057,0.011346763,0.0013747697,0.7633817,0.01338008,0.06441269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061453095,0.00014068201,0.5818713,0.00048733232,0.0002683385,0.00060966087,0.016766034,0.054412737,0.0023893332,0.1245298,0.21816526,0.0002980804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9003144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91094965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09968561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03728113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012574429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27049476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253365953","doi":"","title":"The Economics of Contract Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Perspective (graphical); Law; Economics; Law and economics; Private law; Economic law; Political science; Economic analysis; Comparative law; Engineering; Classical economics","score_opus":0.01906803654000444,"score_gpt":0.19968532857290575,"score_spread":0.1806172920329013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253365953","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002545016,0.54444796,0.009512732,0.23903385,0.006255874,0.000039591934,0.0002548715,0.00002982176,0.19788034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19860101,0.60768175,0.005485435,0.049927227,0.027772823,0.00016325242,0.00037059383,0.00011836511,0.10987948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824154,0.0006940007,0.00005631072,0.00020088808,0.0006459619,0.00016139532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745876,0.0017376405,0.00014273987,0.00013744661,0.00038704337,0.00013650503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002052702,0.0006246286,0.0004966233,0.0024462407,0.002118398,0.0053200875,0.00084712007,0.0036377148,0.007379715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053082462,0.00041019026,0.0006155877,0.0028544134,0.008783736,0.0060600233,0.001152672,0.0038621451,0.0014824381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046591026,0.00001287297,0.00010937912,0.000075465956,0.0000066491566,0.000025094205,0.00013177634,0.00043396442,0.000024045976,0.87968034,0.109033845,0.010461879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073216206,0.0000073120605,0.0004518978,0.0004430246,0.0000040652903,0.00007237056,0.00016285146,0.00033965995,0.000025830319,0.6297158,0.3687609,0.00000898108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009847819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070797196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009847819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00984378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005904625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07142198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254595780","doi":"","title":"Causal Draws and Causal Inferences: A Solution to Clements v. Clements (and Other Causation Cases)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Appeal; Supreme court; Tort; Doctrine; Law; Test (biology); Damages; Confusion; Common law; Psychology; Political science; Liability","score_opus":0.048773234802778086,"score_gpt":0.24416100295228063,"score_spread":0.19538776814950254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254595780","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019402703,0.008499765,0.35931724,0.34245497,0.0022209536,0.00057838194,0.0006451043,0.00036621216,0.2665147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7858145,0.0047594034,0.11353152,0.054754127,0.0046598427,0.00064275635,0.00032123123,0.00016469939,0.03535188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97532576,0.012903269,0.0013333054,0.003822411,0.0047286977,0.0018864962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9613744,0.030131368,0.0020599249,0.0028237489,0.002951117,0.0006594734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027964598,0.00087238336,0.0011187562,0.0039125555,0.00818042,0.008987548,0.004404857,0.017479453,0.012761614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08350564,0.0011554632,0.0015808264,0.0033599876,0.023228858,0.01736925,0.006859028,0.013653086,0.00084228034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004973079,0.000005071469,0.00012486895,0.000016777693,0.0000061705614,0.00009066701,0.0004314384,0.00013856431,0.000008572469,0.990729,0.003978124,0.004465782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022042663,0.0000054030857,0.00017186739,0.000086622764,0.000017487959,0.00012235752,0.00026340023,0.0010771853,0.00007213794,0.976587,0.021559032,0.000015505224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017429577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017648662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027964598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008432296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010261142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14789265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255639981","doi":"","title":"Fortuity Clauses in Liability Insurance: Solving Coverage Dilemmas for Intentional and Criminal Conduct","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Indemnity; Morality; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Liability; Tort; Political science; Insurance fraud; Punishment (psychology); Liability insurance; Law; Law and economics; Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03162794705151175,"score_gpt":0.20765950117775103,"score_spread":0.17603155412623928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255639981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15290937,0.019561378,0.121538565,0.19780672,0.00072289805,0.00011850948,0.000093966846,0.00011097054,0.5071376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757864,0.0025985057,0.008175907,0.0042281635,0.00036329267,0.00005873953,0.000019101932,0.000033942055,0.00873592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.991184,0.005191877,0.00027498795,0.0005005888,0.0019397103,0.0009089713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98825526,0.009426858,0.0006757721,0.00044629167,0.0008846031,0.00031119326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011167264,0.00055227993,0.0005970275,0.0026581353,0.007011304,0.012770851,0.0025415171,0.00858607,0.0026830148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018822085,0.000595583,0.0007009342,0.0016080651,0.047121212,0.01328046,0.0055421144,0.010189347,0.00023161089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024821893,0.0000023171501,0.000066625515,0.0000053956082,8.4450545e-7,0.00005039556,0.0016035767,0.00022151602,0.000020642514,0.99664646,0.00034364645,0.0010360205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009729957,0.0000070141364,0.0002834373,0.00012933856,0.0000082895285,0.000050264753,0.002778099,0.0017284205,0.0001288149,0.9804314,0.014428884,0.000016399094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05195045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049773924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05195045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019947533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0113163525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14473015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255660262","doi":"","title":"The Economist Critique of the Romano-Germanic Tradition","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Conceptualization; Epistemology; Criticism; Normative; Presupposition; State (computer science); Instrumentalism; Sociology; Law; Political science; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.00902863114476792,"score_gpt":0.19864716740245558,"score_spread":0.18961853625768765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255660262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015103878,0.011616534,0.037293024,0.22166216,0.0016995836,0.00002859833,0.0003660174,0.00012746816,0.7121028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8848775,0.010687033,0.011406042,0.028229874,0.0048045088,0.00020350228,0.00020330111,0.00026008536,0.05932806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945879,0.0024464126,0.00021678468,0.00076857134,0.0016232135,0.00035707306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99531883,0.0024540345,0.00053376186,0.0006332833,0.000937989,0.0001221345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006348675,0.0004905047,0.00046032455,0.0024326723,0.002513593,0.0066119563,0.0014115792,0.0028977063,0.0037781456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009916361,0.00032142582,0.00040254107,0.0032188364,0.021510795,0.0058362274,0.002234876,0.005634177,0.0010456936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016901116,0.0000015240589,0.00003241423,0.000007112867,8.983582e-7,0.0000053561957,0.00018792751,0.000043494536,0.0000050604385,0.9963068,0.00252011,0.0008877236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000119316655,0.000006880794,0.00043265056,0.00011969508,0.000004574182,0.000050011196,0.0003442903,0.0004972981,0.00009025656,0.8058021,0.19263053,0.000009689539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065858522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051609892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066119563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055184546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003624588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04003936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257388923","doi":"","title":"I've Got More Experts than You - Experts and the Environment Court","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Zealand journal of environmental law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Project commissioning; Federal court; Sample (material); Law; Logistic regression; Resource (disambiguation); Public relations; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.013683557552081194,"score_gpt":0.1895716100060199,"score_spread":0.1758880524539387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257388923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28314593,0.010753292,0.010240917,0.3825707,0.0012502858,0.00007278217,0.00022569258,0.00006767372,0.31167266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93971056,0.0029150278,0.0018124813,0.036158685,0.0007951016,0.00003891833,0.000063896674,0.000028313041,0.018477099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835006,0.00767313,0.0005187927,0.0015420552,0.0041201906,0.002645337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9522006,0.028480537,0.007591625,0.0014791613,0.0037483645,0.0064997626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015283537,0.00021068871,0.0005529915,0.0020465516,0.0064758565,0.008290034,0.0008209993,0.003891426,0.017046787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06274399,0.00031433516,0.00026659452,0.002553124,0.009830654,0.011142922,0.005097869,0.005670416,0.001509052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032651244,0.00031160325,0.13035911,0.00042721315,0.00012767536,0.0015430218,0.03751379,0.0008596831,0.0009895316,0.5311015,0.14360638,0.152834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010672483,0.00033617963,0.12347521,0.0022256298,0.00016769863,0.0036204997,0.09533361,0.0014096542,0.0015250108,0.3205796,0.45095387,0.00026624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010404567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02143392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017046787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029377271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003995186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08082807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263766996","doi":"10.4337/9781847204370.00019","title":"Regulation in Brazil: Retrospect and Prospects","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Regional science; Geography","score_opus":0.01959123368380027,"score_gpt":0.1957073451585975,"score_spread":0.17611611147479722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263766996","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05642278,0.4977278,0.0024866897,0.08989036,0.0009149844,0.000057093723,0.0005864213,0.00008178501,0.35183206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.609744,0.33934945,0.0024167446,0.013349599,0.0008425145,0.00008575085,0.00038622392,0.000051475163,0.033774253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912065,0.00025264916,0.00004954928,0.0001087467,0.0002800019,0.00018836914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984517,0.00051689014,0.00030889595,0.000109451365,0.00047858394,0.0001344399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001998286,0.0002809134,0.0003618095,0.0019554053,0.001371014,0.002808912,0.0006448569,0.0018369132,0.0024318935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038755087,0.00026459256,0.00045876985,0.003449102,0.002641551,0.0023050988,0.0012857016,0.0012893025,0.00042110475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000573666,0.00007759318,0.010025601,0.0018768535,0.00003730702,0.0010782658,0.004636892,0.0018259387,0.0017316351,0.7440036,0.027097037,0.20755191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011995001,0.000069000795,0.023935637,0.0030034557,0.000045660705,0.00074257446,0.0029623727,0.0008159942,0.0007069921,0.04449561,0.92317086,0.000039886185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08345315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09896403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08345315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008815708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008733347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1659348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264483113","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.969816","title":"Contracts as Organizations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.00953031056113546,"score_gpt":0.20758219999966573,"score_spread":0.19805188943853028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264483113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017052045,0.011321561,0.043211296,0.0428544,0.0007623125,0.00008407598,0.00018390678,0.00009876922,0.8844318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84083205,0.00599409,0.01049579,0.005236554,0.0013586733,0.00031826342,0.00020406772,0.00009475164,0.13546567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972939,0.0013424193,0.00009603739,0.0004659892,0.0005414397,0.0002602622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963909,0.0017493798,0.0003320631,0.00067064195,0.00052769925,0.0003292041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00379718,0.00042698317,0.0005171014,0.0010525746,0.0032198033,0.011276425,0.0009282257,0.0059562307,0.016519219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009240187,0.00037656535,0.00032435203,0.0016295935,0.012985944,0.011495983,0.0023957563,0.0044739726,0.0019080789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010286216,0.000001629217,0.000024973775,0.000002094721,4.3375425e-7,0.000002177139,0.000081382466,0.000040823645,0.0000048811044,0.9981875,0.0009700044,0.00068301597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045504194,0.00000273706,0.000044317163,0.00001525905,0.0000012249975,0.000008997149,0.00009734071,0.00019085758,0.000014235047,0.9772077,0.022411425,0.0000014198894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037895667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025798157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016519219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003896079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032655394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055262268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265971175","doi":"","title":"Enabling versus controlling∗","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.08591155041727862,"score_gpt":0.23458177294364227,"score_spread":0.14867022252636364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265971175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03704234,0.0018509945,0.029849835,0.01714875,0.00059614936,0.0001891312,0.00068785576,0.00061842904,0.91201645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9322341,0.0016360225,0.0042775217,0.004397902,0.00050358375,0.00021633704,0.00036605552,0.00028952933,0.056078944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99184966,0.002258858,0.00036463057,0.0018438497,0.0014458953,0.0022370557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98316723,0.0075795455,0.001712181,0.0054516983,0.0011085235,0.0009807805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068734093,0.0008715039,0.0006753461,0.0009162377,0.0022061644,0.007833721,0.0017438551,0.0030755906,0.06916438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027100766,0.00044063065,0.0007625467,0.001525381,0.0050185537,0.009396429,0.004565546,0.0029800977,0.008906222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071377646,0.000044920267,0.0013674232,0.00012188153,0.000014065082,0.0000715234,0.00081622053,0.0004422488,0.00045506764,0.9683543,0.007746212,0.020494819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010023396,0.000115685885,0.0038611996,0.00036046497,0.00008621636,0.00019134651,0.001471007,0.0013457908,0.0031194799,0.7090654,0.28023744,0.000045694764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039031084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026662075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06916438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002271535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039378903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2313779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266465003","doi":"","title":"Stolen Goods, A Cruise Disaster and a Right of Way Gone Wrong: Three Unconscionable Contracts Cases From a Law and Economics Perspective","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscionability; Doctrine; Supreme court; Freedom of contract; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Damages; Political science","score_opus":0.026286308721095275,"score_gpt":0.2385595537531798,"score_spread":0.21227324503208453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266465003","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38805148,0.0052387067,0.01376769,0.11775935,0.00072144764,0.00047090952,0.00043790363,0.000060109254,0.47349244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9253293,0.0034517802,0.0044846986,0.020703016,0.00022288282,0.00027683168,0.000108935004,0.000025678559,0.045396715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946477,0.00091665704,0.00017687124,0.00026747672,0.0021075574,0.0018837176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941928,0.0040217945,0.0004588121,0.00018697587,0.0006286433,0.00051105855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045185033,0.0007408081,0.0007432073,0.0024674677,0.019380659,0.008773173,0.0037811424,0.021945773,0.002453314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01120001,0.0007288963,0.0014634522,0.0029552714,0.022529006,0.00603769,0.0064688073,0.015252889,0.00024892428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035958867,0.000093896095,0.0016553467,0.00004928757,0.000014428011,0.004111842,0.008253158,0.00097350584,0.0002322103,0.96983653,0.009711636,0.005032196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024244135,0.00019100148,0.014727055,0.00074348325,0.00021829389,0.005890659,0.052633658,0.007036688,0.0051401174,0.6988114,0.21377437,0.0005906875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3714407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47355947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3714407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024006527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017553061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73855734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267564286","doi":"10.1007/s00199-018-1120-1","title":"Robust mechanisms: the curvature case","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico","keywords":"Nonlinear pricing; Stochastic game; Monotonic function; Mathematical economics; Robustness (evolution); Mathematical optimization; Mechanism design; Principal (computer security); Incentive compatibility; Transferable utility; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Game theory; Microeconomics; Incentive","score_opus":0.02870496292240506,"score_gpt":0.20091475309143908,"score_spread":0.172209790169034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267564286","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24509376,0.0025965364,0.6338812,0.026231406,0.0001602425,0.00018493203,0.00054503884,0.0010690157,0.090237916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98112124,0.0006029896,0.009396799,0.0006012096,0.0001581156,0.00007465868,0.000051975625,0.00008589197,0.007907093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949975,0.0021979641,0.00020100188,0.0008483403,0.00095721043,0.00079797284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95623535,0.019656619,0.009194112,0.0100840675,0.0030309972,0.0017987967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009546987,0.0007092063,0.0017554848,0.0020124882,0.0013213035,0.0056494814,0.002866826,0.0060078,0.0118660685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056654263,0.0008247725,0.0018072374,0.0015431577,0.006822724,0.00962683,0.0037581318,0.004386406,0.0014465131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023566778,0.000013057403,0.0005078557,0.000017603563,0.000026777414,0.0000847826,0.00007148493,0.006657196,0.0001406384,0.98926955,0.00055910327,0.0026283397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039460567,0.000015719426,0.0004889138,0.000017044395,0.000020734473,0.00009585787,0.00004050289,0.029009502,0.00010178047,0.96910346,0.0010477281,0.00001929172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033811438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012519272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0118660685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026826693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018237645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050489843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269022568","doi":"","title":"Patchwork Contextualism in the Anglo-Canadian Law of Insurance Policy Interpretation: Implications for the Principles of the Law of Liability Insurance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualism; Interpretation (philosophy); Insurance law; Law; Liability insurance; Liability; Insurance policy; Political science; Actuarial science; Business; Philosophy; General insurance","score_opus":0.03762694150808371,"score_gpt":0.2521567645448596,"score_spread":0.21452982303677587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269022568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10556331,0.003654885,0.05182793,0.0833188,0.0005368489,0.00025809315,0.00071773335,0.00017933069,0.75394315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97468853,0.00075950555,0.007849529,0.0034414288,0.00013511085,0.00007318677,0.000070560316,0.000072736504,0.012909427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99215204,0.0022670194,0.00033456428,0.0014293937,0.0020885714,0.0017283538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98893505,0.0052073463,0.0005299046,0.0010282408,0.0036980733,0.0006012927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008896707,0.0004351846,0.00086626946,0.0028092929,0.01535461,0.015561623,0.0032760224,0.0042317864,0.011926985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027031377,0.0007729774,0.00079566473,0.0043880013,0.040050816,0.0066158692,0.0041104876,0.0076862215,0.0004403115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008363344,0.0000040823247,0.0002977578,0.000014717204,0.000004416256,0.000036205165,0.0040332815,0.00025321712,0.00004570939,0.99144816,0.0015054832,0.0023487005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005193841,0.00000947398,0.0044596964,0.0002829343,0.000051144496,0.00008689772,0.0077131777,0.0029644729,0.0002114449,0.9162192,0.06785645,0.000093113114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9335786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9553876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07109266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07109266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08332142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51581573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269378464","doi":"10.7202/602296ar","title":"Régulation des risques et insolvabilité : le rôle de la responsabilité pour faute en information imparfaite","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024010309310894193,"score_gpt":0.24582542803625282,"score_spread":0.22181511872535864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269378464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18422326,0.015433002,0.12091226,0.0733792,0.0005735327,0.0003704729,0.00035993796,0.00022327264,0.6045251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9571901,0.0030656948,0.006892796,0.00437257,0.00039864244,0.00021153917,0.000059576614,0.000042753716,0.027766343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97496414,0.010588165,0.0014650668,0.0031002571,0.0075686667,0.00231374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9293177,0.042134516,0.010894165,0.0075602354,0.007967142,0.0021262444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019310975,0.0007838218,0.0011720591,0.0026819496,0.0039561964,0.011554495,0.0027097694,0.009715223,0.01515922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0632969,0.0008487161,0.0010964319,0.001591323,0.012953066,0.008911754,0.004446543,0.0070764255,0.002507534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010582436,0.000114292,0.005266432,0.00019303935,0.000075654294,0.00028730978,0.002354964,0.001693865,0.0016012304,0.96235645,0.0020942618,0.023856761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001063899,0.0004143155,0.015717877,0.00088651455,0.00020772583,0.0015187413,0.0024703094,0.0048135496,0.006578141,0.88672817,0.08038977,0.00016852353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005382867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034918315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019310975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008602147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10212743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269410457","doi":"","title":"Responsibility Without Fault: Bazley V Curry","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Curry; Liability; Vicarious liability; Consistency (knowledge bases); Flexibility (engineering); Balance (ability); Law and economics; Test (biology); Strict liability; Law; Political science; Economics; Tort; Actuarial science; Business; Psychology; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.024170769094785795,"score_gpt":0.22821150806081653,"score_spread":0.20404073896603073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269410457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07317785,0.009006924,0.008309244,0.33275095,0.0022051956,0.00026149547,0.0003846122,0.00012460703,0.57377905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70326877,0.0033139733,0.003878381,0.19842277,0.001410297,0.00033518032,0.00013080577,0.0001369863,0.089102834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918839,0.0009920526,0.00026354496,0.0017830766,0.0030847327,0.0019927057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964288,0.0016553407,0.0002791844,0.00025927846,0.0008152224,0.00056223455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069700507,0.0004787324,0.0010741547,0.0012067633,0.011156796,0.009047471,0.002568745,0.018527139,0.005848158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027166888,0.0006699906,0.00063322805,0.001034015,0.0118213,0.0071358527,0.0058710934,0.015774801,0.0008118458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003602994,0.000011289268,0.00087629986,0.00003389913,0.000013310968,0.000525458,0.0030823522,0.000120979894,0.00019048661,0.9418808,0.047748033,0.0054809004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014406731,0.00006576072,0.00632921,0.00047744426,0.00015158085,0.00088322617,0.0035364795,0.0012543739,0.0013562719,0.47416958,0.5114311,0.00020103456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43399143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35109973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43399143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010279444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032291587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86293066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269528630","doi":"","title":"Causation, Contribution and Clements: Revisiting the Material Contribution Test in Canadian Tort Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Tort; Appeal; Supreme court; Plaintiff; Law; Sine qua non; Liability; Political science; Balance (ability); Law and economics; Deterrence (psychology); Common law; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.012266391677989617,"score_gpt":0.19747449842720027,"score_spread":0.18520810674921065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269528630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055644095,0.0099947825,0.089185216,0.10081,0.0023052467,0.00063427974,0.0008271446,0.00021805716,0.74038124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9161569,0.0044471812,0.032724347,0.019019486,0.0008278764,0.00026520592,0.00029438437,0.0001023137,0.026162447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96394277,0.0058690486,0.0013536131,0.0029028845,0.021334434,0.004597128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96724385,0.017191278,0.0013512885,0.0014190286,0.011552944,0.0012416843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025011145,0.0013611264,0.001572436,0.0110673215,0.016952856,0.012630822,0.0069259214,0.009981177,0.006279321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07830271,0.00091780914,0.0018363921,0.007542178,0.049012344,0.01356703,0.00797084,0.013082404,0.0006407309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007687629,0.0000066187117,0.00062814046,0.000024782694,0.0000066329794,0.00010658736,0.0006094449,0.00034165411,0.000035251534,0.99047065,0.0022798253,0.005482651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007567571,0.00003523317,0.0045501334,0.0004347371,0.000058417732,0.00016941252,0.0010711267,0.004096667,0.00029504875,0.91436213,0.07469646,0.00015490774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86359864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8846876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13640136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.063767046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1089528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46266448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272579279","doi":"","title":"L'indemnisation des victimes d'accidents du travail et des maladies professionnelles. Aspects juridiques en droit québécois, 2e édition (M.Sansfaçon).","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.018161915515335216,"score_gpt":0.22241377021961656,"score_spread":0.20425185470428134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272579279","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0353119,0.816199,0.0016034737,0.065591745,0.0073651434,0.000109898196,0.008960567,0.00010499978,0.06475333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25257155,0.46088886,0.0029042342,0.0063889227,0.0030657572,0.00017884221,0.0065835053,0.00007748554,0.26734087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988708,0.00018442927,0.000072338866,0.000091075264,0.0006350216,0.00014627284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974349,0.00035989122,0.00026113048,0.000049814193,0.0016462053,0.00024809805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002106589,0.00066865236,0.00060319464,0.005655177,0.0025206567,0.0020391082,0.0013929404,0.0017982792,0.013879356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063043134,0.0005403352,0.00053626153,0.0039366186,0.0019927106,0.0011657154,0.0006714557,0.0012588132,0.0016671616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010368406,0.00009331001,0.05034975,0.0010479122,0.00008406815,0.0007130708,0.0053421403,0.00058517506,0.00045644667,0.007383697,0.5924374,0.34140342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002327437,0.00008980101,0.4076952,0.0022425903,0.00006663149,0.002271983,0.005052671,0.00041170616,0.00039297718,0.00225748,0.5794016,0.000094000956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92404014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9553221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07595986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01224545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025538754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15281433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274639973","doi":"","title":"Comment on interjurisdictional regulatory competition in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Economics; Business; Public economics; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.03254047361043824,"score_gpt":0.25503595380688643,"score_spread":0.2224954801964482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274639973","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008440919,0.0041821357,0.0004424301,0.8977352,0.008573338,0.00007407823,0.0030356245,0.0001428741,0.0773734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05359585,0.0024232855,0.00038607395,0.87920165,0.005704261,0.00008637631,0.0005517448,0.00011349709,0.057937305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98775023,0.00045774283,0.0005396812,0.0014262829,0.0059026494,0.0039234194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97170097,0.013165956,0.0012446301,0.000943524,0.010786878,0.0021580372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049145874,0.00087009213,0.0019889618,0.0025788955,0.018953452,0.0077787805,0.007250209,0.059694927,0.015437071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031891044,0.0011692302,0.00207837,0.0067437952,0.006844818,0.0029347637,0.0025282153,0.03182618,0.0023699417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068690446,0.000018584584,0.0014013011,0.000089509806,0.000029107869,0.0003557323,0.0008549838,0.0003114813,0.00014951396,0.046180513,0.9472316,0.0033089952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002240985,0.000028469876,0.01534087,0.00047187344,0.00015020532,0.00027565638,0.00236893,0.00101097,0.00056337763,0.013707943,0.9656308,0.00022674767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9804954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98665655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9330291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06697087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13615075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48590994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275964226","doi":"","title":"Perdu dans le labyrinthe et retrouvé dans le jardin : la problématique des clauses restrictives dans les contrats d’emploi dans les provinces de common law au Canada (Lost in the Labyrinth and Found in the Garden: Issues with Restrictive Clauses in Employment Contracts in Canada's Common Law Provinces)","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017845656921249613,"score_gpt":0.22614724036714942,"score_spread":0.2083015834458998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275964226","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7196787,0.015331326,0.0145088695,0.11198881,0.00034061132,0.00014891324,0.0018154759,0.00009801639,0.13608927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97855777,0.0013417879,0.0018825477,0.0027649566,0.000040840463,0.00003066769,0.00012898521,0.000043431017,0.015208959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.987993,0.002336773,0.00049596647,0.0010469189,0.004205783,0.003921623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98304546,0.008369894,0.0014126432,0.00080118544,0.005076401,0.0012945074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011018049,0.00034233017,0.00092438376,0.0019623197,0.018446865,0.016567092,0.0036685679,0.0043142885,0.005304269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04200724,0.00079186755,0.00041819765,0.0050195325,0.015071063,0.0057009696,0.0035132975,0.007985596,0.00027439973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121655634,0.000040964456,0.033870168,0.00013119658,0.000060226655,0.000618692,0.064066835,0.0020624367,0.00033199112,0.8430201,0.023620479,0.0320552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014299752,0.00008377603,0.16649033,0.0017691641,0.00026690346,0.00077098137,0.20820197,0.008724937,0.0023848498,0.16621202,0.44449356,0.00045852954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99126595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99339056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08297182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08297182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14704221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6020055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276543958","doi":"10.7202/1035110ar","title":"L’économétrie des contrats : le rôle des archives de paie, des expériences et des modèles économiques","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.06016426138482631,"score_gpt":0.23835746848260989,"score_spread":0.17819320709778358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276543958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04912073,0.068169266,0.085239336,0.15681827,0.0024526105,0.00010101492,0.0007656576,0.00022043053,0.6371127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8191094,0.034048352,0.0152823245,0.0046210433,0.0017188698,0.00011032541,0.00033966938,0.00023401328,0.124536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.993739,0.0030460143,0.00021990068,0.0006416721,0.001947225,0.00040623246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99053407,0.004846131,0.0008278091,0.0015093002,0.0018407454,0.00044186675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053969366,0.00048986013,0.00062445155,0.0019577548,0.0028140403,0.013414649,0.0018806609,0.0050980547,0.02134086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01940487,0.0005102005,0.0007107469,0.0028519512,0.0116795,0.017129255,0.0031020525,0.0056152097,0.002200023],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009908563,0.000010010755,0.00024046627,0.00003860158,0.000005480531,0.000039227158,0.00052812323,0.0007480475,0.000037590544,0.98663086,0.004793322,0.0069183353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013833675,0.000019127776,0.00074726506,0.00033054233,0.000010909399,0.00020438658,0.0009863189,0.0026926617,0.0002542868,0.8149034,0.17980635,0.00003089032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02351939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013065354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02351939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077382466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07139224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277406761","doi":"10.7282/t3gm859s","title":"Two essays on regulation and transparency","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0292982484159263,"score_gpt":0.2057315651387309,"score_spread":0.1764333167228046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277406761","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014786653,0.050043337,0.014830842,0.61717945,0.03342837,0.00012228626,0.00030470086,0.00013021601,0.2691741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38073084,0.049432755,0.0083813,0.2623224,0.063657686,0.00069736136,0.0004754766,0.00040500026,0.23389725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934685,0.0022111663,0.0003639984,0.00095946464,0.0023371456,0.0006596247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97164637,0.020909294,0.0020031119,0.0017934181,0.0028351205,0.00081257895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005999147,0.000593797,0.00059028296,0.0016784181,0.0033980024,0.0059040096,0.0010598575,0.005410109,0.006316456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0278743,0.00033764818,0.0010184757,0.0016735954,0.011629639,0.008020108,0.0034245017,0.009442589,0.0013106676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006222943,0.00010097029,0.0010895504,0.0002596927,0.000022782464,0.00012066861,0.0056847627,0.000452234,0.00039122067,0.7453716,0.21364073,0.03280365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000314986,0.000052720552,0.0016879198,0.0007941879,0.000015968622,0.00014842187,0.00178623,0.00031725023,0.00042501462,0.17242655,0.8222692,0.000044942644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017694884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010680945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006316456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003229863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028288565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031726897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2280781988","doi":"","title":"The NHL Labour Dispute and the Common Law, the Competition Law, and Public Policy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Competition (biology); Collective bargaining; Commonwealth; Context (archaeology); Salary; Common law; Competition law; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Monopoly; Market economy","score_opus":0.01755874130976704,"score_gpt":0.20600480730983964,"score_spread":0.1884460660000726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2280781988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103378996,0.01472456,0.005130738,0.29624707,0.0005467805,0.00006639984,0.00018134047,0.000035496498,0.5796886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484472,0.0029635355,0.0007261133,0.021049744,0.00043445543,0.00003811,0.000056066117,0.000015573305,0.026269145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99251115,0.00175001,0.0001322222,0.0004973791,0.002089748,0.0030194523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929818,0.0043420657,0.0005497282,0.00036657898,0.0009350131,0.00082483265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005938805,0.0002445285,0.0004842722,0.0020251481,0.014518207,0.015010383,0.0019472092,0.00930115,0.005914197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015533116,0.00029185048,0.00041128273,0.0032385834,0.051982667,0.004094077,0.0034000506,0.005909528,0.00028108567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046405567,0.000006759147,0.0002917185,0.000006729188,0.0000014637852,0.000037678754,0.0005278104,0.00018214289,0.000015978141,0.9939148,0.0034004846,0.0016098024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031749652,0.000017179149,0.0037387174,0.0002566874,0.00001511412,0.000051644045,0.007057837,0.0009769463,0.00013472237,0.8506557,0.13701944,0.00004439483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7843165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76343066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7843165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08145876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07294041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59102744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283738272","doi":"10.7202/1034462ar","title":"L’inaction en tant que modalité de l’actus reus en droit criminel économique canadien","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.026311986321320105,"score_gpt":0.20481907513802838,"score_spread":0.1785070888167083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283738272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21696484,0.010717706,0.02151487,0.060943607,0.0007779993,0.000119063974,0.0004975023,0.000093398616,0.688371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8717413,0.003622432,0.002282576,0.0048460485,0.0002615417,0.000073142415,0.000105190666,0.000058591882,0.11700912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948389,0.001463022,0.00022766808,0.00066668156,0.0016416272,0.001162138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922206,0.004072538,0.0009481355,0.0008019017,0.001597594,0.00035921193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043195887,0.00047093906,0.0006350363,0.0022674503,0.005052653,0.007035704,0.0013861201,0.0029433512,0.021513557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013814918,0.00040843638,0.000801655,0.0018001058,0.009380336,0.0037856663,0.00432139,0.0050258976,0.0019224206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031044343,0.000032797117,0.007017729,0.00008636844,0.000026953692,0.0003346343,0.008189449,0.00042172096,0.00024114142,0.95866126,0.0051390463,0.019817863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032732394,0.00013201739,0.046314433,0.0012298506,0.00013748535,0.0016735652,0.022841958,0.0020954078,0.001981195,0.33868983,0.5847175,0.00015389861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05731962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06532713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94268036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007439248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005163886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11397195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285169489","doi":"","title":"On Lemons and Leather: Liability for Misrepresentations of Forward-Looking Information in Danier Leather","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Issuer; Prospectus; Liability; Obligation; Credibility; Business; Accounting; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.012363040821848869,"score_gpt":0.22780444335599784,"score_spread":0.21544140253414898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285169489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21136877,0.0059355306,0.018725049,0.3176191,0.0007010261,0.0003408142,0.00049030886,0.00015841021,0.444661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9094795,0.0017617984,0.0022272186,0.041569624,0.00048739012,0.000072349896,0.000055404707,0.000038711933,0.044308025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846368,0.002503712,0.0007507251,0.0019020853,0.0072906734,0.0029160343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97913647,0.013122099,0.0014361036,0.0012375785,0.004471549,0.0005961321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015002081,0.00049218023,0.0007428242,0.0013937458,0.010458416,0.00963833,0.0027383845,0.017173046,0.0027022003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040891286,0.0005941576,0.0008353271,0.0012849094,0.013814717,0.0055991937,0.003256886,0.012872615,0.00044522097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006331332,0.000027626378,0.0032663296,0.000033160126,0.00003559439,0.0018354971,0.00529979,0.0007323876,0.0005346692,0.95315796,0.0267026,0.008311021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020744924,0.00012580729,0.011604533,0.00084493513,0.0003558105,0.0014700327,0.0048094634,0.012015405,0.0047151246,0.7830185,0.18036216,0.00047074663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56163347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59938437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56163347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023243202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03409229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8818963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285258898","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2202928","title":"Impact of U.S. Class Action Lawsuits on Cross-Listed Foreign Companies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Business; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Accounting; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.031388949759683336,"score_gpt":0.2639853339108837,"score_spread":0.23259638415120035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285258898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93201673,0.0020130414,0.00009524241,0.012875224,0.00023382924,0.000024930152,0.0011217339,0.000033154578,0.05158623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896236,0.00055439386,0.000016607524,0.0019863702,0.00010707873,0.0000080349955,0.0003295757,0.000004952824,0.007369432],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980326,0.00035010304,0.00007841494,0.00014959883,0.00048393948,0.0009053182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867491,0.004441751,0.0050713113,0.00032549506,0.0014513236,0.0019609807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019174041,0.00024445972,0.00035591706,0.0018877013,0.0020441553,0.004423575,0.00072782463,0.003420579,0.014253834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013045491,0.00017207567,0.00055587426,0.0013104122,0.0011151794,0.0012839895,0.0016726331,0.0034391088,0.0013035893],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020098807,0.002141964,0.7569115,0.0001922799,0.00041288437,0.0032402086,0.0028161518,0.0030003807,0.001268636,0.055470485,0.10433211,0.06820348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030664643,0.0009680474,0.9289823,0.00047260372,0.0005508038,0.0008405811,0.011316526,0.004218084,0.0030869641,0.0074388245,0.04171189,0.000106626925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09408135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13191274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09408135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033456136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033408392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18706745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2287801952","doi":"10.7202/1100324ar","title":"FORUM NON CONVENIENS","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Tribunal; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021438357543219537,"score_gpt":0.22190940463532524,"score_spread":0.2004710470921057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2287801952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037656783,0.0014788788,0.0041994313,0.013402614,0.005712839,0.00022136806,0.0008604488,0.00054754067,0.9698111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09974225,0.0010673592,0.0030740853,0.019345885,0.0034244242,0.00046085034,0.0010223048,0.00046145063,0.8714014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99376243,0.0009617918,0.00035343543,0.0009947896,0.0025143982,0.0014132207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935567,0.002418456,0.0003626532,0.0010539317,0.0020939612,0.0005143982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004777473,0.0006671895,0.000706615,0.0016799738,0.007310522,0.008021675,0.0017590048,0.010963656,0.13781248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014153845,0.0007043351,0.00096156046,0.0011052244,0.0019374054,0.0037641276,0.003280567,0.0078112967,0.029693253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058117465,0.00003682486,0.00033712515,0.00006619732,0.000006836971,0.00055744185,0.000563581,0.000117581585,0.00092792796,0.5956905,0.37368226,0.027955528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027126156,0.000022551258,0.00048491504,0.00007866292,0.000004598866,0.00016756714,0.00016789282,0.00024431758,0.00041970905,0.022149324,0.9762146,0.00001876086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017802613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02697168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13781248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004010457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073352363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4610287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291373579","doi":"10.14288/1.0096010","title":"A preliminary examination of the no arbitrage property in the Canadian security market","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrage; Property (philosophy); Business; Financial economics; Economics; Actuarial science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009325024104889893,"score_gpt":0.14553409450824353,"score_spread":0.13620907040335364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291373579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81701463,0.0012963848,0.007713963,0.010847606,0.00006319338,0.00012637307,0.0012355158,0.000069837646,0.16163245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99239576,0.0006271361,0.0016141301,0.00024252963,0.000033516913,0.0000111743675,0.00029631134,0.00001234462,0.004767119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799746,0.00020497074,0.00006757258,0.00018935086,0.0010694687,0.00047118208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98451024,0.007929598,0.0015084667,0.0007257865,0.004787405,0.00053851167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028075487,0.00031428123,0.00053454866,0.0015897887,0.0035193742,0.003136228,0.0011289708,0.000585766,0.012304621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031557575,0.00015301807,0.0006573886,0.0024051436,0.0030736174,0.0022689071,0.0008122826,0.0012327207,0.00027315126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002695388,0.00012507863,0.10900547,0.00020811705,0.00008424815,0.0010240873,0.0040024645,0.009760066,0.001417503,0.79872197,0.010127384,0.06525403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001581383,0.00022988654,0.5293259,0.00024089744,0.00027716445,0.0005946108,0.014001866,0.13135695,0.003147859,0.22771344,0.09270137,0.00025184947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93275076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9347271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06724924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014444322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0205482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1352905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291541762","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3155","title":"An economic analysis of waiver of tort in negligence actions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waiver; Plaintiff; Tort; Doctrine; Damages; Law; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Liability; Deterrence theory; Contributory negligence; Strict liability; Political science; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.0226978752234672,"score_gpt":0.21142859090212532,"score_spread":0.18873071567865812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291541762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22380683,0.01067287,0.15814865,0.03021337,0.00046263012,0.00047025757,0.0005979723,0.000120985394,0.5755064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708943,0.002810368,0.0034973975,0.0005559126,0.00024441563,0.000111491085,0.00007539269,0.000018410132,0.021792386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973611,0.0009188728,0.000107367756,0.00018764472,0.00081171835,0.0006132892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99453247,0.0036680847,0.00081496703,0.00020266934,0.0004886754,0.00029313198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030706017,0.00047747415,0.00082431996,0.0022037737,0.0020916834,0.0053857733,0.0012112049,0.0029263922,0.0051654154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011279849,0.000595369,0.0010491402,0.0014662357,0.004825106,0.0044661174,0.0016573912,0.0032617068,0.00031498433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014920439,0.000025781119,0.0007184194,0.000031010244,0.000017533941,0.00013681747,0.000083164545,0.016313115,0.0001038049,0.9773179,0.00140575,0.0038317835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000337803,0.000099697994,0.0054458543,0.00018069094,0.00010552625,0.00026226547,0.00046025487,0.099734165,0.00034268523,0.8702618,0.023014897,0.00005840354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024721608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021530597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024721608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013351197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059209545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096870124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291604320","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Study of Attorney Responsibility for Fees of an Opposing Party","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of international and comparative law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Doctrine; Liability; Political science; Unconscionability; English law; Business","score_opus":0.15297557878394313,"score_gpt":0.33304374902290673,"score_spread":0.1800681702389636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291604320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89775133,0.002264277,0.0005715279,0.001061336,0.00003073836,0.00003236435,0.000053008607,0.000006449467,0.09822901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950664,0.00078690395,0.00014464244,0.00013220015,0.000012398162,0.0000058019864,0.000023573328,0.000004404768,0.0038236899],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926461,0.0020521383,0.00031188392,0.00046093584,0.0033537876,0.0011750995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97762644,0.013371892,0.0034387135,0.00067870744,0.0038693037,0.0010148835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00396831,0.00010052268,0.0003404188,0.003282649,0.0028798538,0.0034752006,0.0008314608,0.0011931657,0.003821756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030860703,0.00016457308,0.00030631226,0.002834854,0.003295046,0.0026269497,0.0018538666,0.0014554275,0.0002634932],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074692635,0.00076414336,0.33729327,0.0005234827,0.00018331467,0.006227744,0.19909592,0.001972509,0.0032331827,0.25184408,0.0059493757,0.19216609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060200775,0.0005635847,0.731898,0.0004993631,0.00013866865,0.0035115704,0.15120368,0.0012294134,0.0017646621,0.0075460356,0.10148707,0.00009783345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14798337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29585332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14798337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011260265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005849758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29424405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291647034","doi":"10.1108/jbs-08-2014-0094","title":"Bet-the-company decisions: when do they pay off?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Strategy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Value (mathematics); Face (sociological concept); Business; Marketing; Computer science; Qualitative research; Sociology","score_opus":0.04982377732607133,"score_gpt":0.23056782165230974,"score_spread":0.18074404432623842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291647034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77903503,0.0104051065,0.0094892075,0.036909197,0.00074848,0.0002583028,0.0003284553,0.00006662256,0.16275948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922816,0.0014678058,0.0011727187,0.0022985598,0.00013866568,0.000036013356,0.00007629796,0.000018838984,0.0025095192],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98788714,0.0055644796,0.0008035946,0.00078307383,0.0031981375,0.0017635553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94374335,0.035858102,0.011275491,0.0017479834,0.0039842175,0.0033909383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012614433,0.0003069458,0.00064180227,0.0015278269,0.0024097716,0.0066993465,0.0009622932,0.0029011557,0.007405246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075797595,0.00029910347,0.00048331986,0.0016396929,0.00402842,0.0068789707,0.001906025,0.0034661319,0.0010268546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008159559,0.0006328158,0.23898707,0.0009573207,0.00034648308,0.0042482917,0.016804893,0.0031864755,0.0020161553,0.21023777,0.0257509,0.49601585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009115994,0.0005924295,0.33338994,0.0032802464,0.00025260964,0.002868606,0.09202603,0.008182322,0.0038295605,0.39710566,0.15799913,0.0003823054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028328463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056362455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012614433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034129138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029634135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06671226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291884697","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2683633","title":"Unconventional Risk Allocation: Managing the Life Cycle of Shale Projects","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Oil shale; Natural resource economics; Business; Petroleum engineering; Engineering; Economics; Waste management","score_opus":0.02749190379578389,"score_gpt":0.21845611302503304,"score_spread":0.19096420922924914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291884697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73576605,0.0013528579,0.25060606,0.0018908983,0.000061078164,0.00016926303,0.00018657914,0.0001837077,0.009783575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907353,0.00020361159,0.0073612933,0.000029676989,0.000013103314,0.000022315307,0.000027465869,0.000016729979,0.001590498],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999263,0.00037633677,0.000029110004,0.0001078229,0.00009828854,0.0001255469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953643,0.0025320908,0.0008834308,0.00029159753,0.00042004563,0.0005085789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037090513,0.0005404817,0.0006641564,0.0009803926,0.00075015303,0.0031860904,0.0011961084,0.0014074657,0.002452405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014604564,0.00050565175,0.00030138285,0.00070463656,0.00081452535,0.0031340371,0.0018244705,0.0012831582,0.00016341235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026656533,0.000107040025,0.007877286,0.000076355784,0.00007609583,0.00022746458,0.00040089016,0.8723017,0.0015565346,0.050802596,0.0012982922,0.06500913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020191661,0.00010324882,0.0019943863,0.000020572947,0.00002200692,0.000033443703,0.00021342566,0.9337297,0.0005635805,0.061979644,0.0012982683,0.000021533839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036111563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063209175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037090513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017348917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019340079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019615531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293109338","doi":"","title":"First Contract Arbitration: Evidence From British Columbia, Canada of the Significance of Mediator's Non-Binding Recommendations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labor law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediator; Arbitration; Political science; Law; Cell biology; Biology","score_opus":0.01538173669201415,"score_gpt":0.20030613221696972,"score_spread":0.18492439552495557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293109338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85287344,0.005720648,0.00056102197,0.020633,0.00014537293,0.00028577851,0.002722725,0.000044976023,0.11701305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803792,0.0014356778,0.0003127576,0.0013630226,0.000016096517,0.000040971423,0.00069128,0.000018956041,0.015742017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98404723,0.0021076947,0.00092556945,0.0012183641,0.0066535715,0.005047586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.867951,0.056020282,0.012659806,0.005829592,0.04768336,0.009856035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012449917,0.00035539456,0.0011553124,0.0031196643,0.017861199,0.009427615,0.004122645,0.0042266133,0.012253319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.104863815,0.0008333502,0.0005117567,0.006887133,0.0051528574,0.0022600559,0.0026112562,0.0050196135,0.0010465797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027770118,0.0009888449,0.67664546,0.0007972264,0.0005114264,0.0018738601,0.02842225,0.0033864144,0.0012533368,0.0765396,0.10429793,0.10250659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010359401,0.00019609922,0.86942786,0.0009948924,0.00046141303,0.00041294427,0.037103992,0.0028185702,0.0017863356,0.0089894375,0.07644556,0.00032701442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99834406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07167609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07167609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1992105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52004886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293268567","doi":"10.54648/ijcl2016007","title":"<i>Bhasin v. Hrynew</i>: A New Era for Good Faith in Canadian Employment Law, or Just Tinkering at the Margins?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Political science; Law; Good faith; Labour law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.10325419435747472,"score_gpt":0.2912754250040675,"score_spread":0.18802123064659276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293268567","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02554723,0.0107680205,0.0031337591,0.492329,0.0019236857,0.00012218361,0.0005402286,0.00013763427,0.4654982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5025027,0.006693875,0.0048499447,0.29689166,0.00064186647,0.0001104425,0.00031015216,0.000108590255,0.18789078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99311334,0.00060520874,0.00013391302,0.0005655812,0.0033979986,0.0021839344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679786,0.0009657803,0.00026252682,0.00013480807,0.0012684667,0.0005706095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032819426,0.00046452312,0.0003586214,0.0014575066,0.022436367,0.017242447,0.0033061064,0.01121398,0.006962968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007934511,0.00060072873,0.00055613683,0.0021775237,0.019640857,0.0046438663,0.00297529,0.010974514,0.000838815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019658264,0.0000119063525,0.0010168195,0.000052005358,0.000006350436,0.0003004856,0.0068695615,0.000089557936,0.00042906552,0.80444163,0.17722297,0.009540038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037012436,0.000031362386,0.012503439,0.0003668882,0.000035523197,0.00032869383,0.013131288,0.00066338066,0.0010007545,0.07374713,0.8979288,0.00022572243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07225635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07225635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.091062576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.524259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293595810","doi":"10.14288/1.0077767","title":"Variable compensation in British Columbia","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variable (mathematics); Mathematics","score_opus":0.01504090776051941,"score_gpt":0.15851899998930752,"score_spread":0.1434780922287881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293595810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76484585,0.0154417055,0.0008788749,0.014382316,0.0003999496,0.00014685548,0.0030887623,0.00012696913,0.20068873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8828258,0.0043742876,0.0005766829,0.0028260201,0.000024607141,0.000049895774,0.0012046967,0.000030089956,0.10808795],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871457,0.000078897734,0.00004992017,0.00013196262,0.00048000825,0.00054466026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731845,0.00040517084,0.00016360004,0.00008580072,0.0015266683,0.0005003082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006943191,0.00018060293,0.00029180068,0.0018899614,0.0053212456,0.0029037101,0.0011869898,0.0012012303,0.009163234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00272529,0.00025440296,0.00016919266,0.00385949,0.001044354,0.00042989352,0.00089955877,0.001477224,0.00058164244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004253089,0.0003166112,0.23977838,0.00093414437,0.00011390327,0.0058774156,0.011567939,0.0046538366,0.0033128685,0.08654512,0.19534859,0.45112586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006900658,0.00010037171,0.5326165,0.00072177825,0.00006105888,0.0008664387,0.013452933,0.002549634,0.0009247254,0.002254113,0.44624063,0.00014285765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9906658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99616635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05761041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05761041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06360535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41799474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293935000","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2730969","title":"Criminal Discount Factors and Deterrence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Deterrence (psychology); Criminal justice; Economics; Criminology; Business; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.021995800705322033,"score_gpt":0.21181589750125612,"score_spread":0.1898200967959341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293935000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90283275,0.0031047736,0.019966612,0.007030915,0.00014211639,0.000086787964,0.00043462633,0.000057348025,0.06634413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992863,0.00066176965,0.000403834,0.00013619952,0.00005496564,0.0000057700895,0.000048808914,0.000006659719,0.00581909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989473,0.00035638688,0.00006996531,0.00017024974,0.00013837274,0.00031761796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96427166,0.023272743,0.0075249593,0.0015953898,0.0015132198,0.0018219732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035711776,0.00041410487,0.0006615404,0.0011695592,0.00088762725,0.002829976,0.00055852276,0.0018625791,0.010814525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035321966,0.00037658762,0.00044607293,0.00078439235,0.002073495,0.0022159396,0.0008644715,0.003001699,0.00045020675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044322782,0.00030929278,0.10053807,0.00013275642,0.00017637407,0.00064515875,0.0012025122,0.020743938,0.0004387211,0.827653,0.0075770025,0.04013995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011020871,0.00021482013,0.07985104,0.0001479963,0.0001880992,0.00078517565,0.001479213,0.038477536,0.000540956,0.86341625,0.014683828,0.00010491056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011578847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016800756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011578847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019785038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012126114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03617817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295649298","doi":"","title":"Book Notes: Multi-Party Litigation: The Strategic Context, by Wayne V. McIntosh & Cynthia L. Cates","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07322970171930336,"score_gpt":0.22098830446040368,"score_spread":0.1477586027411003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295649298","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016051519,0.0683131,0.0014650451,0.52671486,0.0071330736,0.00007002929,0.0009135184,0.000086660395,0.39369863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046515953,0.076738134,0.0021722591,0.24457684,0.014401002,0.00023823576,0.00069250044,0.00017127107,0.6144938],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867344,0.00025671703,0.000068908485,0.00016896875,0.0006637702,0.0001681571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941135,0.004235446,0.00023641136,0.00014619475,0.0010417082,0.00022677662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017719478,0.00081916404,0.00045854974,0.0017348586,0.0063134194,0.0077011036,0.0024059538,0.017363774,0.03174809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00774837,0.0006548383,0.0005367525,0.0027710856,0.0041426835,0.0076465174,0.0013156121,0.007077752,0.0072022933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031006073,0.000011359617,0.00011335425,0.000027842598,0.0000014975336,0.000030666488,0.00016164337,0.00006306702,0.000022687263,0.06130635,0.93437535,0.0038830086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001792377,0.000015868725,0.0014327323,0.00040421475,0.000009565117,0.00010907118,0.0008698119,0.00026917894,0.0001866521,0.05796452,0.9386882,0.000032120402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094280235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23276064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094280235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059482204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009157786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18746293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296646467","doi":"10.14288/1.0077522","title":"Potential value: a challenge to the quantification of damages for loss of earning capacity for female and aboriginal plaintiffs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Plaintiff; Value (mathematics); Actuarial science; Business; Economics; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.020991407722950453,"score_gpt":0.19883728245178703,"score_spread":0.17784587472883656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296646467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21220434,0.00995356,0.14708614,0.18370719,0.00185474,0.00057228905,0.00065109297,0.00013609185,0.4438346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518304,0.0017641032,0.02157867,0.006136023,0.000672782,0.0002951574,0.00007886225,0.00005122555,0.017592752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9624897,0.011984422,0.0018412002,0.00287624,0.018597692,0.0022107407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95885104,0.022357166,0.0036295645,0.0032715604,0.010975174,0.0009154874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029823998,0.00084139185,0.001235479,0.004767981,0.0078250645,0.012013275,0.0053144833,0.005405816,0.0048533645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068758674,0.00054703385,0.0014654261,0.0023488968,0.026459401,0.009755009,0.007699693,0.006525902,0.00045151525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025436015,0.000037481383,0.006079502,0.00012974108,0.000043334523,0.00026567903,0.009933269,0.0010868987,0.0003882917,0.9436921,0.0047778892,0.033540376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026546604,0.0003046954,0.033784844,0.0019400069,0.00017910973,0.0015630239,0.03249908,0.0051013324,0.0024068072,0.79793215,0.12402251,0.00023983535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056192085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087689534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056192085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013551972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015259925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15772629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296799183","doi":"","title":"The Goals of Modern Tort Law: A Proposal for a New Mixed-Pluralistic Theory","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Monism; Law and economics; Distributive justice; Sociology; Economic Justice; Deterrence theory; Law; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Epistemology; Liability","score_opus":0.014296224069625415,"score_gpt":0.22221118869053785,"score_spread":0.20791496462091244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296799183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018332615,0.004379962,0.24222718,0.14676745,0.0014546247,0.0002578411,0.0001348619,0.0001616831,0.5862838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74915266,0.0029941045,0.17336239,0.020492185,0.0023347808,0.0011696364,0.00014463364,0.00030482328,0.050044693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99111897,0.004381765,0.00032338809,0.0011384237,0.0023208822,0.00071665127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604565,0.0012344862,0.0003979012,0.00062644127,0.0008941224,0.00080145214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011743594,0.0010963436,0.0009815416,0.004605341,0.007916499,0.013356386,0.003149699,0.007167459,0.0032352863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005029285,0.00091198704,0.0018353978,0.0022910642,0.053848434,0.022162588,0.011246793,0.011900917,0.0010014232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011005081,0.000005205375,0.00003135832,0.0000044084472,7.925778e-7,0.0000061271753,0.00037463283,0.000057526202,0.000008777737,0.99836534,0.00041425644,0.00073042477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007677887,0.0000053306258,0.00003912943,0.000024100687,0.0000021750195,0.000018119952,0.00029740477,0.000526462,0.000020717685,0.98509026,0.013964082,0.0000046211844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033970983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043945727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013356386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011174112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011593717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08107424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299699967","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.939002","title":"Should Courts Always Enforce What Contracting Parties Write? Second Version","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.0190178882226885,"score_gpt":0.21007543078999802,"score_spread":0.19105754256730953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299699967","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072029373,0.009935702,0.010209333,0.6106435,0.071545176,0.00037818367,0.015832094,0.00095983304,0.2732932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12203583,0.0043970966,0.0057678954,0.36877275,0.04135456,0.0009142578,0.0041904203,0.00037470466,0.45219252],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964594,0.00060463994,0.00028956513,0.00088679884,0.0013092508,0.0004502278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775432,0.011917319,0.00057608384,0.0016518235,0.007833197,0.00047838414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00407482,0.0010418335,0.0021480406,0.002074857,0.0033610784,0.00875687,0.0025634628,0.013990253,0.06780534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03178709,0.0009918398,0.001811948,0.0017660301,0.0028657452,0.0057234396,0.0015259933,0.009895611,0.020357938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001037642,0.00009039769,0.0006043587,0.00014857527,0.00004751143,0.000106453284,0.0002786706,0.00037516537,0.00023350153,0.10966922,0.8787077,0.009634695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032411213,0.00008399733,0.012743318,0.00084104494,0.0003447814,0.00026773676,0.00070118805,0.004436463,0.0015313829,0.2966618,0.68188095,0.00018323865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043751776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03251396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06780534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005300293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043015177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2268315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300064767","doi":"","title":"Civil Processes and Tainted Assets: Examining Canadian Forfeiture Models","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01993846041808911,"score_gpt":0.18986512035204256,"score_spread":0.16992665993395345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300064767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9212403,0.002218595,0.007834152,0.007634443,0.00009751378,0.00010812687,0.0020635647,0.00015253977,0.05865082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97710675,0.001529989,0.0014240543,0.00022826322,0.000045078363,0.000035078287,0.0009149273,0.00007443863,0.018641373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892956,0.0001720877,0.000027811951,0.00012001897,0.00016867716,0.000581785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992351,0.0040060757,0.00073405536,0.0003608056,0.0015122636,0.0010358131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028884725,0.00085549173,0.0015640871,0.0033674608,0.00538738,0.0067969104,0.004380473,0.003023432,0.013851842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013077535,0.00058677205,0.0018269663,0.005624651,0.003453924,0.002829038,0.0017443035,0.0036737777,0.0005783364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031959786,0.00027306224,0.044844173,0.00013083513,0.00016266957,0.00039348155,0.0022495347,0.37159678,0.00017722094,0.54303026,0.022608506,0.014213864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020274601,0.000093491355,0.021753429,0.00013604727,0.00029442314,0.000091824826,0.0034533301,0.8603749,0.00021802583,0.096138805,0.017071014,0.00017190706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9835396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9801584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04687898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04687898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036658753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34013242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W230007564","doi":"","title":"Sentencing the Criminal Corporation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Corporation; Incentive; Criminal law; Context (archaeology); Profit (economics); Corporate crime; Law and economics; Political science; Criminal procedure; Law; Criminology; Business; Economics; Sociology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.027924840452276868,"score_gpt":0.21220727907728495,"score_spread":0.1842824386250081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W230007564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34640822,0.008906443,0.014854342,0.16029757,0.0017710471,0.00007436041,0.00015947512,0.00011174217,0.46741676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772884,0.0008628911,0.0014113338,0.0063508754,0.000586279,0.000029661049,0.000027347249,0.000015788808,0.013427383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889508,0.0037426988,0.0006967888,0.0011931456,0.0036259934,0.0017906412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98497033,0.006484948,0.0028775549,0.0012502205,0.0031200254,0.001296945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006520815,0.00024738166,0.00053830235,0.0013288644,0.005141694,0.0067984425,0.0015910289,0.0067897676,0.004368751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03519668,0.000351914,0.00030876815,0.00057392917,0.0061402973,0.004113309,0.0034205853,0.0076918104,0.0005586093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028789076,0.000031725118,0.0019497628,0.000042275773,0.0000117804275,0.00025833608,0.0010776356,0.00059554103,0.00023121193,0.95962787,0.012376722,0.023768418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006492234,0.00035350636,0.03314052,0.0009890307,0.000088178334,0.0020210475,0.0036212811,0.007115458,0.002445076,0.6610939,0.28890505,0.0001620053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063046454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008389457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067984425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004536655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006702558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034485817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302941327","doi":"","title":"Navigating the Tripartite Relationship","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Business; Reputation; Liability; Duty; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Liability insurance; Prejudice (legal term); Law; Insurance policy; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.03253433330845061,"score_gpt":0.24442023811279268,"score_spread":0.21188590480434205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302941327","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06804808,0.0022541792,0.28144288,0.055148084,0.00031535755,0.00019625397,0.00019166351,0.00014261191,0.5922609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9294285,0.001241731,0.036110107,0.00379545,0.00017482913,0.00019598092,0.00009206383,0.00008544113,0.02887591],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901412,0.0061728735,0.00021492652,0.0011211286,0.0013673129,0.0009825374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98900384,0.0044372836,0.0011936938,0.0016035815,0.0019520947,0.0018095208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071821534,0.00031426564,0.0006410326,0.0016631617,0.009534799,0.010792607,0.0023200875,0.0054303547,0.033608563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021035805,0.000617823,0.0005733802,0.0020198114,0.011351001,0.016868921,0.010166058,0.007075387,0.003288622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007944104,0.000009376318,0.00018378286,0.000010676145,0.0000043453697,0.00008893043,0.00070463005,0.00031022963,0.000036392532,0.9923293,0.0019264239,0.0043879985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008403484,0.000008887078,0.00019913213,0.000036450572,0.0000055315636,0.0001415082,0.0012505508,0.0021573042,0.000035466535,0.96881616,0.027332691,0.000008013568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056553828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008856462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033608563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005861106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057867668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112431824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2308786770","doi":"","title":"The Civil Litigation Process : Cases and Materials","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Civil litigation; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Civil procedure; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.021034258906250256,"score_gpt":0.22080421632588446,"score_spread":0.19976995741963421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2308786770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011993705,0.015111617,0.0042772884,0.009621541,0.0060722446,0.0007702894,0.003020445,0.00064721325,0.9592801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01715912,0.026474869,0.009088136,0.005101146,0.0037697384,0.0008923484,0.00726166,0.00051660533,0.9297364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978484,0.00025762088,0.0001470222,0.00014678319,0.0014166615,0.00018356668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971976,0.0012198674,0.00018371272,0.00023058258,0.00076625997,0.00040201927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015857432,0.00077919936,0.0006172768,0.0036580472,0.0035340926,0.0068634665,0.0016787156,0.0023987086,0.107637346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00655327,0.000752594,0.0004231338,0.0050712456,0.0020008294,0.0038672155,0.0026593262,0.0024816815,0.04702151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068939935,0.000042863114,0.000048394435,0.000117906566,4.9429474e-7,0.00007431297,0.00034720878,0.00019919452,0.00016623925,0.039849944,0.9100868,0.04905982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002075486,0.0000042249317,0.00026166113,0.00015216124,4.3504426e-7,0.00005713501,0.00020864926,0.00003748932,0.000046548306,0.0036048489,0.9956185,0.00000621845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0455425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0609194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107637346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066423146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013193711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3600828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319353645","doi":"10.2469/dig.v44.n1.23","title":"Bucking the Trend: The Informativeness of Analyst Contrarian Recommendations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CFA Digest","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation","funders":"","keywords":"Contrarian; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.03187989434836128,"score_gpt":0.22117140743169963,"score_spread":0.18929151308333836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319353645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40161166,0.01612009,0.2834793,0.13456148,0.0037285083,0.000321924,0.0023538002,0.0013043805,0.15651888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732869,0.0017787523,0.013006856,0.00515845,0.0026602675,0.000055298406,0.00023850703,0.00016745382,0.00364744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9734355,0.016778417,0.0012496482,0.0032975755,0.0045042606,0.0007345336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4401006,0.49740565,0.023348954,0.024956431,0.012666186,0.0015221864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048481658,0.00080761866,0.0017851619,0.0039649694,0.0021192883,0.007351722,0.002405782,0.005302908,0.011165632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4668241,0.00080341764,0.0008074263,0.0038554715,0.003344606,0.010203471,0.00156508,0.008091743,0.0015507332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024162375,0.0002679899,0.080133446,0.0005510584,0.001567932,0.0012107423,0.003047099,0.028393734,0.0016788407,0.44609016,0.09395794,0.34068477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029425503,0.00019230861,0.02486807,0.00037829063,0.00073151453,0.0004094391,0.0015939213,0.15268672,0.0027651207,0.7945634,0.02137138,0.00014560153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041033244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053670467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048481658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001852973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021031548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25639856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319929104","doi":"10.1016/j.gheart.2014.03.1804","title":"PM486 Socio-demographic correlates of disease-related knowledge in cardiac rehabilitation participants in Toronto, Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Heart","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Allocative efficiency; Endogeneity; Moderation; Electricity; Injustice; Mains electricity; Economics; Public economics; Microeconomics; Environmental economics; Econometrics; Social psychology; Psychology; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.012290173820021906,"score_gpt":0.22982886822408327,"score_spread":0.21753869440406137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319929104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99345934,0.00030439012,0.000042507778,0.00049992674,0.00001036699,0.000021131338,0.0022078028,0.0000034719237,0.0034509802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778736,0.00019102663,0.000042218755,0.0000780453,0.000005339453,0.000012046353,0.0006091085,0.0000019250595,0.0012728309],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942505,0.000057337704,0.000052793366,0.00009694965,0.00015652918,0.00021140298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972899,0.00024323571,0.00067312724,0.00008743944,0.00078060967,0.0009257275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004735213,0.00019036049,0.0003084639,0.0011362025,0.0022901674,0.0012273694,0.00090568163,0.00054269034,0.0072743627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028124938,0.00019304027,0.00044104896,0.002027336,0.0007939258,0.00036041613,0.0008288311,0.00079308834,0.00047476307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002457094,0.000029925726,0.99635977,0.000017759447,0.000019435862,0.00007065173,0.0012833512,0.000041199237,0.00007823059,0.00010680889,0.00066899497,0.0012993442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020784826,0.000011866607,0.9963726,0.00002483478,0.000008909862,0.000036966223,0.002942339,0.00009379139,0.000019401776,0.000021805288,0.00045966308,0.0000057220204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9809669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019033074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011774187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015234114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08542806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319959292","doi":"10.7202/1106943ar","title":"Determinants of Total Compensation forAuto Bodily Injury Liability Under No-Fault:Investigation, Negotiationand the Suspicion of Fraud","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Negotiation; Liability; Fault (geology); Psychology; Computer security; Business; Actuarial science; Computer science; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Accounting; Seismology","score_opus":0.046364650228723374,"score_gpt":0.2658082464247352,"score_spread":0.21944359619601184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319959292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990283,0.00006742121,0.00012842365,0.00011370124,0.0000013664252,0.000012664447,0.000012734085,0.0000010989277,0.00063437177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997383,0.00002115605,0.000058651072,0.0000039462916,0.0000026415787,0.00000397791,0.000015582422,5.221078e-7,0.0001552322],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538934,0.0015726186,0.0006075487,0.00031358504,0.0012800841,0.00083680276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9187714,0.037006352,0.03428213,0.0029426133,0.0031635426,0.0038339957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006017318,0.00033782804,0.0004189554,0.0017704581,0.00077996746,0.0026069072,0.00093527,0.0012425126,0.0065423045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043072134,0.000287355,0.0009890241,0.0011246904,0.0013556224,0.0011504282,0.0019364523,0.0013268921,0.00038282693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013311266,0.00016969426,0.9943178,0.000009631758,0.000037474925,0.00010109993,0.0005629315,0.00044801852,0.0001998191,0.00042918752,0.000034221943,0.0035569514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004748902,0.00009352928,0.99542713,0.0000140070315,0.000022648575,0.0001448922,0.0013176157,0.0023097459,0.00014829215,0.00040936927,0.00010065586,0.000007232391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047910046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036961054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065423045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010958324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012696589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03182298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331146542","doi":"","title":"Mistaken Assumptions in Equity: Sound Doctrine or Chimera?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Chimera (genetics); Equity (law); Law and economics; Sound (geography); Business; Economics; Financial economics; Political science; Law; Acoustics; Physics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05301996949309257,"score_gpt":0.2669934540747381,"score_spread":0.21397348458164556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331146542","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10707032,0.007691953,0.3566317,0.3105341,0.0019975044,0.00010926038,0.00035482517,0.00025662335,0.21535373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615321,0.0013398443,0.021247668,0.008207628,0.0013351899,0.00008920849,0.00005834979,0.0001150781,0.006075032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884079,0.0059307013,0.00054095674,0.0015808612,0.0026599006,0.00087959145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96720904,0.020368533,0.0025297818,0.006073744,0.0029451037,0.0008737458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021157954,0.00056643336,0.0014805659,0.0018784307,0.003610882,0.009236918,0.0038026692,0.008465404,0.006174961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07194542,0.0006476547,0.00072324846,0.0015130298,0.040321574,0.02735876,0.006232836,0.015378888,0.0007368877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007613059,0.0000066435223,0.00013967702,0.000007888942,0.000007763079,0.000030494175,0.00046230332,0.00024723294,0.000018859724,0.9950713,0.0012838618,0.0027163755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031435568,0.0000016465758,0.000030322519,0.000008720867,0.0000027493372,0.000011901736,0.00009655455,0.00046961842,0.000024734314,0.9980868,0.0012609551,0.0000028783859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029678165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002285423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021157954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00346559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037771713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11189526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332252163","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n2p187","title":"Evidence and Attestation Conflicts with Other Cases to Prove Litigation in Iran","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil litigation; Confession (law); Oath; Law; Magistrate; Political science; Dominion; Civil procedure; Code (set theory); Computer security; Psychology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.062422266045211484,"score_gpt":0.2530614796976359,"score_spread":0.19063921365242445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332252163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9048237,0.0046475073,0.003117613,0.0119854,0.0001717181,0.00020848039,0.00013463048,0.00001678786,0.07489414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965578,0.00048244293,0.0006467169,0.00050099124,0.000086230226,0.00001824795,0.00004050172,0.0000029776152,0.0016640265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97312385,0.010368336,0.0024170212,0.0017520295,0.008318054,0.004020737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9117678,0.057961922,0.018384948,0.0030466793,0.006261153,0.002577578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020866765,0.00029690075,0.00068931095,0.005565046,0.0061172065,0.007532772,0.0019551031,0.0047365488,0.0067809853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063515045,0.00045925073,0.0008446895,0.004504215,0.0060566724,0.003665244,0.0033802234,0.003312692,0.00039591227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006798575,0.0011268698,0.26887766,0.00053824205,0.00039437934,0.03506578,0.022664232,0.003661348,0.0011562202,0.5781645,0.015855271,0.071815625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005022182,0.0007100526,0.3458904,0.0014012628,0.00090187014,0.03983133,0.07613721,0.024091715,0.006845085,0.30413198,0.19905522,0.0005016268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009252842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007130183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020866765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064122095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054754745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11035532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332392287","doi":"10.1515/gj-2014-0013","title":"Rule of Law Reforms and Institutional Change Processes in Eastern DR Congo: Neo-institutional Economics vs <i>Multijuralism</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Rule of law; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Institutional change; Institutional economics; Political science; Path dependence; Law and development; State (computer science); New institutional economics; Washington Consensus; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Economic system; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Neoclassical economics; Politics; Development studies; Public administration; Geography","score_opus":0.059856609548209434,"score_gpt":0.24476369115273772,"score_spread":0.1849070816045283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332392287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9453407,0.0017135717,0.0037714706,0.008347161,0.0000121457015,0.00003857504,0.00007968981,0.00000756588,0.04068902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994229,0.0001180815,0.00012179043,0.00004235593,0.0000034197612,0.000003237836,0.0000039019606,8.07041e-7,0.000283379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862576,0.0008018563,0.000054734985,0.00012800857,0.00011424049,0.00027536042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936977,0.0027573148,0.0023838622,0.0002622512,0.0004518991,0.00044697567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026728038,0.00008817577,0.0001648171,0.0018068951,0.0013553009,0.0040574563,0.00047300413,0.0007528669,0.0025911236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060602296,0.000106876454,0.00014624905,0.0014892727,0.0065879365,0.003040871,0.0015071658,0.0007661197,0.00008213952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007527156,0.0001508896,0.11314462,0.00009940756,0.000046481055,0.0010002593,0.011874048,0.00513308,0.0005776993,0.8476743,0.00081915176,0.019404724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052263164,0.000099088815,0.56768644,0.00044521742,0.00007820054,0.00051731605,0.045272112,0.026516784,0.0015649282,0.31811208,0.039576743,0.00007876946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023260718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030419197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023260718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009193903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001799041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06670672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333726417","doi":"","title":"Large Law Firms and Capture: Towards a Nuanced Understanding of Self-Regulation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Position (finance); Business; Law and economics; Legal profession; Law; Economics; Political science; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.01767413678182714,"score_gpt":0.2044492734427874,"score_spread":0.18677513666096027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333726417","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17816581,0.007611606,0.24826956,0.05821106,0.00021164036,0.00016901553,0.0001314751,0.00011449728,0.50711536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905494,0.00088632066,0.0038720407,0.0015866496,0.00016015349,0.00006334655,0.00002005208,0.000017958942,0.0028441325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99327576,0.0032060302,0.00021026962,0.0010855919,0.0012318247,0.0009905393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98327214,0.010090367,0.0023308052,0.0027784242,0.00081506895,0.00071319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008578077,0.00032707004,0.00074092567,0.0021312148,0.0023331705,0.011625091,0.0021440214,0.005016714,0.003253201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011705051,0.00044547292,0.00086353667,0.001439901,0.03251133,0.012869543,0.005943996,0.005533477,0.00023691362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019643785,0.000006135947,0.00041345152,0.0000055939663,0.00000246625,0.000010344733,0.00032712572,0.00035737403,0.000027857466,0.9977943,0.00011918468,0.0009341362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057694247,0.0000103221755,0.0013462271,0.00004781099,0.0000053813683,0.000026209857,0.00038557567,0.0021821603,0.000072000534,0.9902844,0.0056250403,0.000009108229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044132066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024269742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011625091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005151105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032136051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04536575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334777707","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00109.x","title":"A Quarter‐Century of Summary Judgment Practice in Six Federal District Courts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Summary judgment; Supreme court; Plaintiff; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Law; Expansive; Quarter (Canadian coin); Civil procedure; Trial court; Political science; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.05306115369832261,"score_gpt":0.3166783985502088,"score_spread":0.2636172448518862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334777707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981079,0.00029067195,0.00017250031,0.0002666468,0.0000064338005,0.0000064533415,0.00022925157,0.0000044333424,0.0009156418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99846834,0.0001720755,0.00019113695,0.00007462194,0.000013472701,0.000009419977,0.00039757608,0.0000026485864,0.00067067647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955972,0.0009556154,0.00050045695,0.0008277789,0.0013913519,0.0007276053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97478545,0.006385039,0.012729151,0.0016974158,0.0025949432,0.0018079982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003615041,0.000096729724,0.0002489962,0.0034070604,0.0019714688,0.0017957567,0.00065064477,0.00093506195,0.0012906257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014824927,0.0003618923,0.00037598627,0.0046960227,0.0014822974,0.0015279504,0.0014396359,0.0010983209,0.00024424843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026581637,0.00017522286,0.940769,0.000055215198,0.00006404671,0.000438555,0.012005086,0.00053763564,0.0023678923,0.0017822308,0.0014187125,0.0401206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003454806,0.00008630946,0.9946219,0.000016487866,0.000009758673,0.00011247379,0.002246283,0.00017260075,0.00042074727,0.00012226602,0.002172694,0.000015146648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02821141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08068941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02821141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034599989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016615828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056094408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336529691","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12344","title":"INTEGRATING MARKET ALTERNATIVES INTO THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF OPTIMAL DETERRENCE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Economics; Deterrence (psychology); Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Microeconomics; Deterrence theory; Maximization; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03664326103578679,"score_gpt":0.2465113949051027,"score_spread":0.2098681338693159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336529691","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053116616,0.007672745,0.6907925,0.023288146,0.00059913803,0.0001439831,0.00028773054,0.00010595529,0.22399324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94167113,0.0045873597,0.03711252,0.00076077715,0.00062522135,0.0002655392,0.00008721999,0.00004228783,0.014847859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975074,0.0013801169,0.000087180204,0.00018936039,0.00061259465,0.00022333866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99614847,0.0027554736,0.00031379604,0.0002219387,0.00038546536,0.0001749609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033036293,0.00072229584,0.00083914766,0.0014041723,0.0010271143,0.0033855734,0.0014890054,0.002397585,0.007075709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00916798,0.00036873567,0.0008833538,0.0013339396,0.004615836,0.0047832965,0.0019566938,0.0026264188,0.000522896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028713785,0.0000073998867,0.000048723974,0.0000149443895,0.0000035631804,0.000012476435,0.00001734415,0.012547248,0.000013418019,0.9855327,0.00032973086,0.0014696356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057374527,0.0000054311063,0.000043497916,0.000010675413,0.0000013596101,0.0000066472394,0.000022082177,0.021621661,0.000010628602,0.97681797,0.001450457,0.000003890093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031046474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024968286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007075709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035153164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023856077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025505543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336696113","doi":"10.14288/1.0094785","title":"The determinants of collective bargaining strategy in the British Columbia hospital industry","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collective bargaining; Business; Economics; Operations management; Labour economics","score_opus":0.013256423580199675,"score_gpt":0.17418936237454027,"score_spread":0.1609329387943406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336696113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9203351,0.00035411556,0.0009120705,0.0027652157,0.000017912464,0.00005229682,0.00003222706,0.000009533182,0.0755216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960836,0.0001494939,0.00014400508,0.000074627256,0.0000027903498,0.0000115555795,0.000014133045,0.0000025178915,0.003517306],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955207,0.0011465056,0.00010776181,0.00022111625,0.0010934003,0.0019105236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99117357,0.0039539807,0.0013366594,0.00023659752,0.001354495,0.0019445592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038183697,0.00021654653,0.00030911303,0.002280873,0.006427095,0.0058907615,0.0010368677,0.00103062,0.009292797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013488,0.00027141688,0.0001566864,0.002691841,0.0032112922,0.00074950716,0.0018323994,0.0013141062,0.0007278326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030352146,0.00084348203,0.5167102,0.00021434223,0.00012492223,0.00396443,0.043340236,0.020600455,0.0019848887,0.23100299,0.017560413,0.16335008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006328456,0.00016625469,0.77004725,0.00041025705,0.000050135597,0.0003642701,0.13375229,0.024077138,0.00053256855,0.033529103,0.036912717,0.00009478771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5348798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6882422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4651202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024052298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018957097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9357188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337099646","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1204","title":"Book Notes: Law Firm Strategy: Competitive Advantage and Valuation, by Stephen Mayson","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Law and economics; Business; Law; Economics; Political science; Accounting","score_opus":0.03485197462185056,"score_gpt":0.2262446904631077,"score_spread":0.19139271584125714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337099646","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019852133,0.37767088,0.009283692,0.293145,0.018291201,0.000067977955,0.0025568174,0.00026226215,0.29673693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0423654,0.29437262,0.005946884,0.03848654,0.040920623,0.000155499,0.0016117294,0.00033202994,0.57580864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999701,0.000071982606,0.000020230027,0.0000741238,0.0001126072,0.000020068252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973984,0.0016280363,0.00012465277,0.00012307968,0.00062310515,0.000102742524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076352037,0.001006858,0.0008881806,0.0030358888,0.0013520528,0.004958811,0.00093566213,0.0040479526,0.031617936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050752074,0.00072897656,0.00037601654,0.006748955,0.0025756545,0.0080333855,0.00083100586,0.0038643437,0.0117918085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073419574,0.000018046518,0.00025013677,0.000065159904,0.0000057859074,0.000015951942,0.00008196847,0.00027080637,0.000036362882,0.07641917,0.90117544,0.021653803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014713083,0.000014677319,0.0017867492,0.00038664,0.000015083786,0.000091549715,0.0002065656,0.00059812516,0.00010273891,0.21656503,0.7801913,0.00002683734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022171825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036241576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031617936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003072818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020610972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105772555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338505821","doi":"10.71781/2521","title":"Le dommage moral et le préjudice extrapatrimonial","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Space Agency; Jewish General Hospital; Hydro-Québec; Sociedad Española de Nefrología; De La Salle University","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Humanities; Confusion; Philosophy; Ethnology; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Law","score_opus":0.010679599487285554,"score_gpt":0.16636263509648272,"score_spread":0.15568303560919716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338505821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2259865,0.024733681,0.0075347787,0.0776388,0.0013780654,0.00006006229,0.00018745667,0.000039473143,0.6624412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9095959,0.006807242,0.0009834216,0.0074186316,0.00023658098,0.000040383933,0.000044425717,0.000028750716,0.07484468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640334,0.0014929508,0.00005187662,0.0002694438,0.0011250091,0.0006574292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966119,0.0010855381,0.00041111177,0.0002649606,0.001028845,0.00059768994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035479495,0.0004904965,0.00041203227,0.0014554481,0.009173644,0.008365298,0.0009388238,0.0024299023,0.010487111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004413961,0.00017549691,0.0003211027,0.0016162659,0.022976145,0.0038203218,0.0035782582,0.0044576535,0.0009040715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028923252,0.00003501223,0.0063033737,0.00024397422,0.000019946114,0.00039132134,0.079438075,0.00024246216,0.0008404998,0.86561954,0.012125461,0.034711532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015282829,0.000066635235,0.05189819,0.0018620844,0.000038606875,0.00046213585,0.15682179,0.00061558705,0.0010279495,0.13144419,0.6556426,0.00010491124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.331793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49171543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.331793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017761014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021021351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6597235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343055174","doi":"10.14288/1.0077659","title":"Subjecting the corporation to criminal sanctions : a review of the issues","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Corporation; Political science; Criminology; Law; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.04235169274079805,"score_gpt":0.22196996956166995,"score_spread":0.1796182768208719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343055174","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019138816,0.9849819,0.00035947448,0.006058241,0.0010366276,0.0000063624284,0.00000804379,0.0000047452395,0.0073532797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035083434,0.9889446,0.00036700454,0.0030356348,0.002178488,0.00001584511,0.000018147912,0.000009023452,0.0019228939],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940409,0.0018955757,0.00057839975,0.0006212325,0.002449589,0.00041422472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98871,0.007662917,0.0008350876,0.00027794368,0.0021734561,0.00034069247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005116471,0.001101598,0.0014313816,0.008362352,0.0037771605,0.008153622,0.0023949165,0.009486488,0.003608431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009268792,0.0011017402,0.0009871526,0.00857547,0.012307641,0.012205781,0.002232865,0.007694497,0.0017875462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003753169,0.00016672105,0.00074915413,0.008081595,0.000050389135,0.00042977635,0.0012501207,0.0014035217,0.0002608281,0.34815383,0.12484034,0.5145762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005683588,0.000053738433,0.0012360984,0.010102253,0.000015260806,0.00043880806,0.00053251075,0.00020055064,0.00009821253,0.022635248,0.96465087,0.000030790947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01947164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020145936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01947164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008213736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009998544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059595168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345149660","doi":"","title":"Chapter 5 - Law and Economics: Law as Efficiency","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Comparative law; Principal (computer security); Public law; Philosophy of law; Private law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.011299680106406904,"score_gpt":0.20232413124515838,"score_spread":0.1910244511387515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345149660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048457575,0.09455994,0.058716793,0.1041985,0.0027110483,0.0001242849,0.00052214926,0.00013637988,0.7341851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49176824,0.12581746,0.03456682,0.064935416,0.015585124,0.00050983974,0.00065418717,0.00035118178,0.26581168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831045,0.0007622662,0.000059212714,0.00019378106,0.00047006263,0.0002042117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819666,0.0011436713,0.00013642608,0.00015618074,0.00029193936,0.000075200805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017881315,0.0006393562,0.00053398084,0.0015850737,0.0019020414,0.006451656,0.001144092,0.0036163966,0.020236237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035480422,0.00030640225,0.00062666467,0.0018336227,0.0069181686,0.00790765,0.0016963732,0.0046179197,0.0031063259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016421236,0.0000062982904,0.00008682771,0.000034684894,0.0000024627793,0.000009911625,0.00009838457,0.00017271936,0.00002335047,0.9867475,0.009949138,0.002867026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032546875,0.000012231698,0.0003564604,0.0002722537,0.0000049493824,0.00005958596,0.00021521302,0.0003893054,0.00010365787,0.76047254,0.23810317,0.0000074942845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003472436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027566315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020236237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004303472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003139263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06769693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345535582","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4512","title":"EXPLORING A LAW FIRM BUSINESS MODEL TO IMPROVE ACCESS TO JUSTICE","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Business; Business model; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.23086943353828068,"score_gpt":0.297934905801743,"score_spread":0.0670654722634623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345535582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4971585,0.001217778,0.026376026,0.05307149,0.00012960169,0.00081298355,0.0005252066,0.0002931452,0.42041534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675087,0.00061755144,0.0076956265,0.0011674734,0.000021263111,0.00010169481,0.00014044419,0.00002420421,0.022723116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649674,0.0012258292,0.000054279735,0.00034633308,0.0005005854,0.0013762154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949319,0.0011011976,0.00034000824,0.00023603061,0.0009025037,0.002488416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002393364,0.00031229382,0.00028763126,0.0019336148,0.008207577,0.014188898,0.0023382674,0.0029835836,0.018263428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061347797,0.0003463845,0.00037939614,0.0025210585,0.0042482223,0.0041777063,0.0043348204,0.0027096584,0.001586357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014402342,0.0022710082,0.07790624,0.00022540733,0.000056481233,0.0021800546,0.013593744,0.0118471,0.0017683393,0.77262574,0.025271893,0.09211001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005224838,0.0010277538,0.0773705,0.0010119792,0.00021468491,0.000907558,0.14509554,0.10656713,0.0017905816,0.22387236,0.44141456,0.00020482762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5360609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71188515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5360609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036831852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060433377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9333426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345748993","doi":"10.7202/1037249ar","title":"Victim Pays Damages to Tortfeasor: The When and Wherefore","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ex-ante; Damages; Nuisance; Liability; Order (exchange); Economics; Payment; Law and economics; Ex parte; Unjust enrichment; Compensation (psychology); Tort; Actuarial science; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.02669648984948547,"score_gpt":0.20792027386574397,"score_spread":0.1812237840162585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345748993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30953312,0.016163094,0.055410035,0.1886869,0.0016205532,0.000114796516,0.00024194068,0.000065388434,0.42816427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746147,0.0026857322,0.0027844168,0.0062490352,0.0006423444,0.00003766622,0.000044582906,0.00001644226,0.012925091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995235,0.0017157333,0.00018477473,0.0010048329,0.0009791087,0.00088055315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969574,0.0012727871,0.00077618717,0.00030980952,0.00056397775,0.00011991152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004839874,0.00033946615,0.00064012874,0.0011075089,0.0045069293,0.007644745,0.0018721608,0.0062931245,0.0049458896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008311415,0.00038208807,0.000683069,0.00072778924,0.0171431,0.0104592955,0.0022951434,0.005292699,0.00063808396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039084753,0.000024330333,0.0017858411,0.00004325644,0.00001395634,0.00034692502,0.0033649171,0.00021981978,0.00022487562,0.98676586,0.0018855145,0.005285555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057088462,0.00018324319,0.008165712,0.0006497229,0.000118031996,0.0015260198,0.015819859,0.00240517,0.0011371205,0.85588545,0.11393377,0.00011871032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01242024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010343317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01242024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00548878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029594768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03982407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W234850370","doi":"","title":"Suing Canadian Tax Officials for Negligence: An Assessment of Recent Developments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.031873921575589347,"score_gpt":0.27027795511689673,"score_spread":0.23840403354130738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W234850370","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1645616,0.38570377,0.0015939362,0.24488781,0.0015244267,0.00015488856,0.003078904,0.00010433872,0.19839032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6890991,0.28582686,0.001798409,0.011426462,0.00071404566,0.000035419747,0.0015938113,0.00004743824,0.009458409],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98639697,0.00070235744,0.00049049634,0.0010485828,0.00940602,0.0019555322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94557405,0.008277428,0.005399757,0.00092989946,0.035780508,0.0040382687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0094167385,0.00057925744,0.0007683932,0.013657395,0.010990835,0.008335192,0.0031381277,0.0031576334,0.0055102855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031537697,0.0006830189,0.000994883,0.023512244,0.009549179,0.0038355647,0.0018183291,0.0042883544,0.00031035888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024450803,0.00021736918,0.12241948,0.0028588162,0.0002453487,0.0016066617,0.016338091,0.0020963294,0.0005746692,0.18675953,0.11749384,0.5491454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045647226,0.0001944728,0.37078258,0.00392159,0.00042293026,0.0011258207,0.015238589,0.0012520559,0.0007318777,0.0066556744,0.5992856,0.00034310957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9924297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1854168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1854168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2427837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94480103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2353945784","doi":"","title":"Civil Enforcement System of Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Xiandai faxue","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Enforcement; Law; Business; Imprisonment; Order (exchange); Law enforcement; Political science; Creditor; Finance","score_opus":0.021386516165044632,"score_gpt":0.16663828536780967,"score_spread":0.14525176920276503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2353945784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041177783,0.005329535,0.007105291,0.02486114,0.00091856124,0.00072750816,0.011167223,0.0014087401,0.9073042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42596203,0.0069229943,0.011884325,0.008588704,0.00029713672,0.00032185487,0.0066884654,0.00027294128,0.5390616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931015,0.00030546176,0.00024621582,0.00055966066,0.003847225,0.0019399686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871523,0.00045925597,0.00042341763,0.00031386796,0.010208672,0.0014424893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016757541,0.00045205123,0.0003259783,0.005231764,0.013410144,0.006324617,0.0017256852,0.0013209694,0.025514102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008558035,0.0005174095,0.00042275386,0.005268464,0.0022700725,0.0009638017,0.0014808071,0.001991284,0.0028014344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056461184,0.000053573145,0.012381044,0.00024060656,0.000038065566,0.0006914969,0.0019068349,0.001554225,0.0008003799,0.5084428,0.36439914,0.10943531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025896547,0.000017475286,0.022759046,0.00019616043,0.000033706187,0.0002237626,0.00079493824,0.0016044738,0.0004531096,0.0063499063,0.96745515,0.00008635188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99175125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99211144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09063164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09063164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27669802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6575817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2368126597","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1191","title":"Book Review: The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal, by David M. Trubek and Alvaro Santos (eds)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.021669030019809167,"score_gpt":0.23814011342324456,"score_spread":0.2164710834034354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2368126597","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007364165,0.9368771,0.00022208964,0.042658478,0.015429595,0.0000146335315,0.00017538555,0.00001954127,0.004529648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002266701,0.94720334,0.0004429277,0.011621457,0.025524752,0.000046207788,0.00036002108,0.000039975588,0.012494655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705064,0.0007025835,0.00020432603,0.00021738863,0.0017018558,0.00012324641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97185045,0.016093709,0.0014507952,0.00045302036,0.009471305,0.00068065006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003543697,0.0015449867,0.0025303205,0.010739732,0.0012150974,0.0067103156,0.0018203172,0.004068053,0.01616105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023595367,0.00077681174,0.000783656,0.014367959,0.0027962814,0.006076555,0.0014082547,0.004754931,0.008403607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000892275,0.0000055940973,0.00007677443,0.0008194483,0.00001431159,0.00001312474,0.000031745294,0.0000824994,0.000014397327,0.0031800957,0.96831405,0.02743904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015511727,0.00001806276,0.0010062145,0.0056012417,0.000042439413,0.00013815804,0.00018288764,0.00014391956,0.000057151457,0.010125349,0.9826461,0.000022893822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014219024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03220179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01616105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006122233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010343595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054064095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2369799645","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v32i1.4520","title":"THE EVOLUTION OF SMALL CLAIMS COURT: RISING MONETARY LIMITS AND USE OF LEGAL REPRESENTATION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Humanities; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Partition (number theory); Sociology; Mathematics; Art; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.10082545312982537,"score_gpt":0.27100063302034005,"score_spread":0.17017517989051467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2369799645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935917,0.00019705485,0.0000637228,0.00087967963,0.000004827381,0.0000092929695,0.00024289645,0.0000026650355,0.0050079846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986481,0.0000905566,0.00003021034,0.000039832496,0.000006066971,0.000003058667,0.00012035222,0.000002080557,0.0010597765],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983487,0.00028101724,0.000092282324,0.00023705134,0.00065850513,0.0003824474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98766965,0.00253947,0.0047925194,0.00045510722,0.0021986861,0.002344621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013250604,0.00008429518,0.00023891295,0.0014634646,0.0018881882,0.003381017,0.0010300056,0.00087243825,0.0038757888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013744971,0.00021108825,0.0001603185,0.0020049193,0.0029636486,0.0016939258,0.001886163,0.0014144381,0.00031604496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027444187,0.00018076571,0.93727106,0.000041601932,0.00005644007,0.00079044874,0.035371356,0.0007262806,0.0013213359,0.004962179,0.0021421735,0.016861843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016539866,0.00002237527,0.9921543,0.000010762642,0.000003347546,0.00003810382,0.006153379,0.00014739847,0.00008420359,0.00015733883,0.0012186858,0.000008552735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66543216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8134902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66543216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015219299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052280305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6730764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2397629409","doi":"","title":"Resurfice, Clements & Ediger: une trilogie en matière de causalité factuelle (Resurfice, Clements & Ediger: A Trilogy in Factual Causation)","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017820272332199023,"score_gpt":0.24083113876968665,"score_spread":0.22301086643748763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2397629409","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023230268,0.12940833,0.13959791,0.48874202,0.004745561,0.00015643262,0.00064361043,0.0001634451,0.21331246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8168093,0.05535119,0.0362949,0.026098734,0.006709188,0.00044769872,0.00032629844,0.00026257616,0.057700027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941532,0.0035644898,0.00022051031,0.0009944665,0.00074079935,0.00032650816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9749867,0.020387078,0.0011513424,0.0013314143,0.001754779,0.00038862103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011378325,0.0005865973,0.000806746,0.003702972,0.004336218,0.007965351,0.0015371896,0.004834998,0.010111054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03479775,0.00076177466,0.0010549608,0.0033371705,0.03577904,0.020229707,0.0033053556,0.006036362,0.000966933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005870609,0.0000045420306,0.00026268413,0.00004092856,0.0000060089897,0.000063925996,0.0009970944,0.0001564789,0.00002067633,0.985294,0.009083317,0.0040645236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072831513,0.0000064143032,0.0006594422,0.0001308803,0.000011113214,0.0001166237,0.0005976562,0.000541418,0.00006878738,0.96463513,0.03320956,0.000015724978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016357804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012439725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016357804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008420893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044345567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061098218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2398764358","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2327412","title":"Endogenous Property Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Property rights; Property (philosophy); Business; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.022028420045842573,"score_gpt":0.18501577044178616,"score_spread":0.1629873503959436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2398764358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13737713,0.0017409859,0.08357081,0.0155852735,0.0003908872,0.0001350539,0.0007106454,0.00022233925,0.7602669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92260104,0.0004420779,0.0023251632,0.00062596414,0.00016991897,0.000051961917,0.00007972012,0.000023255345,0.07368092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867344,0.00029554995,0.00004228947,0.00036047387,0.00032107966,0.00030719288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962907,0.0014528853,0.0005150071,0.0009250897,0.00044954728,0.00036688233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001464018,0.00029174864,0.0005590823,0.0006571612,0.001228549,0.005142077,0.00091806543,0.0026460877,0.040170636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077744424,0.00031036272,0.0005224401,0.00061225373,0.003309526,0.005054859,0.0015242297,0.0030076324,0.002654925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007330398,0.000026655893,0.00025349733,0.000009027256,0.0000047409876,0.00003093034,0.00004342138,0.0006996013,0.00011531901,0.9950446,0.001531417,0.0022333981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019855433,0.000013981238,0.0006440039,0.000020524882,0.000009529804,0.00005937973,0.00010214957,0.0042542196,0.00030004594,0.9827229,0.01184587,0.0000075847106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013739157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013821411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040170636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024058553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019227088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13438416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2403115497","doi":"10.29173/alr460","title":"The Presumption of Resulting Trust and Beneficiary Designations: What's Intention Got to Do with It?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Beneficiary; Business; Law; Advertising; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.03404301890190835,"score_gpt":0.2367284345395588,"score_spread":0.20268541563765047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2403115497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1799464,0.013604005,0.036502786,0.35299093,0.0010843287,0.00016512025,0.00029317135,0.000112654205,0.4153006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9647642,0.003656792,0.0036682694,0.014146439,0.00018809401,0.000033917502,0.000055007724,0.000037609152,0.013449655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.984962,0.0024167956,0.00059977546,0.0009799169,0.006923955,0.004117645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778176,0.010728179,0.0020556743,0.0015069908,0.0066884393,0.0012031174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018490352,0.00040134898,0.0006488625,0.0015775032,0.011473674,0.016277842,0.0037789913,0.0071863164,0.003093144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038778245,0.000440211,0.0011560908,0.0023255742,0.04479642,0.011738171,0.003846477,0.011487615,0.00054016913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013004592,0.000010935705,0.002758903,0.00005191642,0.00001008097,0.0001921482,0.0077557303,0.00012752798,0.00011217882,0.9757623,0.0028719723,0.010333304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070315786,0.00009561432,0.026266893,0.0020301375,0.00020900444,0.00082648516,0.063835144,0.0022893685,0.0026412287,0.6728939,0.22849251,0.0003494554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74650186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7736569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25349814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046727568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07366733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50998205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2403164607","doi":"10.14324/111.2052-1871.064","title":"A Critical Economic and Comparative Analysis of the Doctrine of Remoteness of Damage in Contract and Its Functional Equivalents","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Equivalent; Economics; Political science; Biology; Law; Biochemistry","score_opus":0.05559091849798912,"score_gpt":0.2865213054421907,"score_spread":0.23093038694420157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2403164607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055516947,0.017597815,0.059827317,0.032136448,0.00062727585,0.00013720112,0.00015924763,0.000037440797,0.8339602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9554319,0.0052671693,0.008107101,0.0031717904,0.0006850107,0.0001567729,0.00007231544,0.000037887377,0.027070118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566025,0.0017669193,0.00012416218,0.00044589333,0.0013674414,0.0006353201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99327034,0.005010582,0.00039222115,0.00045772374,0.0007023971,0.00016679369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005601791,0.00040197352,0.0006039963,0.0032681809,0.004447256,0.0057984097,0.0014563287,0.0047129625,0.0064828554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015049767,0.0003602521,0.0009638595,0.0025349197,0.019059125,0.008231238,0.0021973345,0.0065019834,0.0004172925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027924978,0.000002617626,0.000016864962,0.0000048054085,8.991073e-7,0.000013130837,0.0000500368,0.00014617605,0.000009841374,0.9987307,0.00032101385,0.00070112327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000091515885,0.000025087635,0.00048561653,0.00008560213,0.000007932134,0.00006410037,0.00020623297,0.0016202695,0.00011766825,0.9717994,0.02556428,0.000014688521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012512499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009926807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014164014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014164014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039303675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10276759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2415717757","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2770587","title":"Prudence and the Convexity of Compensation Contracts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Convexity; Compensation (psychology); Law and economics; Mathematical economics; Economics; Business; Mathematics; Financial economics; Philosophy; Psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.015318808716067635,"score_gpt":0.20041858808924193,"score_spread":0.1850997793731743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2415717757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6390432,0.0041539907,0.18840173,0.018393768,0.00019515351,0.00007504547,0.00068896177,0.0001980544,0.14885007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928267,0.0006446241,0.0028354484,0.00022054794,0.00012405787,0.000021488093,0.00008806414,0.000028445742,0.0032107662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997269,0.0013171991,0.00013884752,0.00032469665,0.00046613222,0.00048410535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9561003,0.034138147,0.0046841246,0.0019041894,0.0018152549,0.0013579407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004244736,0.00044411275,0.001631079,0.0014999048,0.0018650867,0.0069612633,0.0010089335,0.00194952,0.007167517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04404912,0.00062300963,0.00091167685,0.001347658,0.0067730607,0.0051897126,0.0016526341,0.003646413,0.00047652132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042876774,0.000015423939,0.0022490378,0.000021845202,0.000014925049,0.00015782715,0.00020004797,0.007793477,0.00010181169,0.9839278,0.0014537458,0.0040212064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013777889,0.000008655101,0.001770918,0.000015360205,0.0000067248297,0.00006970521,0.00009466185,0.013666701,0.000051385934,0.983412,0.0008807515,0.000009250945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006098368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038699592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007167517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002932572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026562726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023977757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461595673","doi":"10.29173/alr385","title":"Tracking Liability – Traceability and the Farmer","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Traceability; Due diligence; Liability; Causation; Business; Anonymity; Law and economics; Jurisprudence; Law; Risk analysis (engineering); Economics; Accounting; Finance; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05772981324201508,"score_gpt":0.2486449475960792,"score_spread":0.1909151343540641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461595673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06354231,0.07904307,0.015231131,0.22497821,0.00068732334,0.000098392804,0.00027133283,0.00014972937,0.6159985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8547452,0.03224423,0.004027514,0.02148169,0.00041760108,0.000028375076,0.00012487285,0.000042882737,0.08688771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99077517,0.002711532,0.00027112992,0.000895348,0.0041558663,0.0011908432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98783946,0.0052235518,0.0011628135,0.0007252643,0.004326677,0.00072228804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008661353,0.00019192311,0.00029548234,0.0033049155,0.0049041254,0.008122181,0.0015523259,0.005035562,0.005524982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015729645,0.00031884346,0.00028018907,0.0026433608,0.013146741,0.0034003754,0.0019669863,0.0028374202,0.0006363419],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011361871,0.000037571328,0.006732434,0.00012322678,0.000018406081,0.00032660627,0.0017159464,0.0013254788,0.00035517837,0.87378305,0.03944018,0.07613047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020376707,0.00007179157,0.034667227,0.00095663546,0.000064456246,0.00068915467,0.003958124,0.0019126844,0.0007499514,0.34862903,0.60816973,0.00011092605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66379446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6873538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33620554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02285553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044794254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67637104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461785381","doi":"","title":"Just Notice Reform: Enhanced Statutory Termination Provisions for the 99%","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Statutory law; Entitlement (fair division); Law and economics; Political science; Common law; Law; Reform Act; Law reform; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.020670898386106397,"score_gpt":0.2349819889348216,"score_spread":0.21431109054871522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461785381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45580274,0.002014548,0.036095973,0.08373615,0.0012780937,0.0015239874,0.001074045,0.0010294173,0.41744503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9409971,0.00042087497,0.008087526,0.011381537,0.00042407605,0.00025352338,0.00025687832,0.000043911463,0.03813464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835195,0.0026600203,0.0010783479,0.0012759813,0.00817937,0.003286902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98492265,0.005660834,0.0020506738,0.0021578837,0.004163825,0.0010441483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011132156,0.00028747393,0.00042926308,0.0011615532,0.0053208317,0.005889871,0.003538214,0.006701012,0.004097107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031631123,0.0005777128,0.0006837698,0.0013574524,0.005855826,0.003730028,0.0036314859,0.0039358204,0.0006230753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013464318,0.00022240079,0.013400888,0.0001520726,0.000038789625,0.0008095875,0.007746322,0.0026522349,0.004585051,0.8872061,0.04044328,0.042608615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005879331,0.0009121335,0.117307104,0.0006355154,0.00034312982,0.00079697795,0.005624783,0.018251808,0.0067280983,0.25251925,0.5957412,0.00055205636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41358456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.607403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41358456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0222753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044555277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82235444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462044256","doi":"10.12735/jfe.v4i1p01","title":"Financial Assurance versus Liability as Solutions to the Judgment-Proof Problem","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Finance & Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Finance; Actuarial science; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.03666343238868834,"score_gpt":0.2234846178299892,"score_spread":0.18682118544130089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462044256","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13674319,0.0042338553,0.5405685,0.048265506,0.00062206225,0.00034810966,0.00037718055,0.00032551808,0.26851612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94441324,0.0013563288,0.034973264,0.0014329678,0.0005715282,0.00021851054,0.00006580621,0.000060082897,0.016908301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99321574,0.003683665,0.00028764407,0.0007419658,0.0012409228,0.000830013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726838,0.018693201,0.0041028853,0.002189742,0.0012051811,0.0011251204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0113274325,0.0007782407,0.0011006943,0.001435351,0.0018159411,0.005967359,0.0015894966,0.0077536437,0.013603498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041729398,0.00058930146,0.0012448664,0.0011191906,0.009246553,0.009557323,0.004667716,0.005511741,0.000610505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023813027,0.00002389499,0.00013942843,0.00003471211,0.000007380738,0.000032036383,0.000094290284,0.003576041,0.00007611794,0.99075073,0.00089343364,0.004348163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036551373,0.000014495133,0.00008420741,0.000021519681,0.000006132167,0.00002609771,0.000037862843,0.006079131,0.00004996933,0.9917292,0.0019062009,0.000008535296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011417321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000889776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013603498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030055244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032993802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059905887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462937133","doi":"10.1108/jfc-03-2015-0012","title":"Agency theory and financial crime: the paradox of the opportunistic executive","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial Crime","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Opportunism; Ethical egoism; Prudence; Agency (philosophy); Corporate governance; Law and economics; Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03074484273903186,"score_gpt":0.2268816007577228,"score_spread":0.19613675801869093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462937133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42184776,0.006459809,0.04438587,0.11977363,0.00046880372,0.00010396624,0.00005425627,0.000040844086,0.40686515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947701,0.00052118837,0.0010751539,0.0010654004,0.000065715736,0.000026529839,0.0000048251623,0.000004887616,0.00246624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99230593,0.0053580888,0.00016935285,0.0004887653,0.0010588289,0.0006190264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841165,0.009841239,0.0029633078,0.0010782043,0.001030839,0.0009699416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072422023,0.00024910402,0.00045167885,0.0015065251,0.0037181529,0.004952996,0.00082243537,0.0023488142,0.0028692752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0140345,0.00020443574,0.0003966803,0.0011451761,0.023078823,0.005640416,0.0030558025,0.003479224,0.0001754375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021884423,0.00003722666,0.0016233674,0.00003734706,0.000008387872,0.0002321451,0.0029843948,0.0006093143,0.000049642145,0.98567736,0.0017899172,0.0069288714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025874566,0.000033534572,0.0027158489,0.00013110373,0.000009508886,0.00039685422,0.006839869,0.0031022693,0.00010508833,0.9702322,0.016382108,0.000025786081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032963695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025173847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072422023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038596417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030165208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03830087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465958958","doi":"10.1002/smj.2525","title":"Asset ownership and incentives in early shareholder capitalism: <scp>L</scp> iverpool shipping in the eighteenth century","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Strategic Management Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder; Incentive; Asset (computer security); Business; Exploit; Equity (law); Bailout; Finance; Law; Economics; Market economy; Financial crisis; Corporate governance; Computer security; Political science","score_opus":0.04405367034610245,"score_gpt":0.2172310238413967,"score_spread":0.17317735349529426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465958958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941148,0.000076586904,0.00007627507,0.00016209333,0.0000012525637,0.0000015055512,0.000012174984,5.3057124e-7,0.0055548064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99914956,0.00004044354,0.000031495805,0.000008852651,0.0000023428217,0.0000010148128,0.000006859673,4.5155906e-7,0.00075891614],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998153,0.000039548486,0.0000094368315,0.000030760588,0.000036464502,0.00006853971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788743,0.0004018963,0.0010548453,0.00006615197,0.0002185514,0.00037114037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077641173,0.000063135805,0.00006472699,0.0005882061,0.00062812096,0.0013398731,0.00022922613,0.00028990893,0.0033100196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025039013,0.00008786807,0.00007557779,0.00040658005,0.0014612575,0.000988127,0.00078681676,0.00048110873,0.00011881742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017812836,0.00025984144,0.855941,0.000040710398,0.000037221584,0.0006356092,0.026783187,0.00204658,0.0011499082,0.07734644,0.0010444538,0.03453693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010135966,0.000072795934,0.97365487,0.00005273116,0.000010154755,0.00017646486,0.0069384337,0.0014639423,0.00067383196,0.0058642505,0.011063399,0.000018971201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014732474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023572598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014732474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016862194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060852495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029293478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2466666236","doi":"10.7202/1058484ar","title":"La nature du contrat de transaction et le problème de la novation","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007894740439533598,"score_gpt":0.1986767048878432,"score_spread":0.1907819644483096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2466666236","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021473223,0.005366691,0.79341036,0.017066037,0.0015183133,0.00030230562,0.00033888037,0.00081370975,0.15971047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3859314,0.0056350566,0.41629952,0.0042841886,0.000891586,0.00044084172,0.0008896381,0.001423015,0.18420471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97924405,0.008683733,0.0011688566,0.003911139,0.0057690544,0.0012231942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978959,0.00824979,0.0014648387,0.007551322,0.003306863,0.0004682207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008833312,0.0010562637,0.001160114,0.0015521345,0.0044155684,0.012945551,0.0040162173,0.0042725736,0.02174206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024210537,0.0010602155,0.0022133905,0.00237052,0.01468082,0.0164424,0.0055091563,0.0068562054,0.006201774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006977026,0.000022581227,0.00066978077,0.00020652422,0.00002771302,0.00021953319,0.0016868946,0.0016427559,0.00093762623,0.9474027,0.005120865,0.04199311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030749514,0.000070600996,0.0012357377,0.0004346423,0.00006196899,0.0012701575,0.0019586454,0.019004911,0.005216613,0.6276157,0.34298503,0.00011513557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013214948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010623719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02174206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005774957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066969227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072734475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477900629","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511495564.007","title":"Profits derived from wrongs","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Permission; Tort; Law; Profit (economics); Unjust enrichment; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Business; Real property; Restitution; Political science; Economics; Liability; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03389851188328351,"score_gpt":0.1724316501457906,"score_spread":0.13853313826250707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477900629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0243463,0.0030487082,0.020543758,0.03384418,0.0014125094,0.000069299684,0.00019999454,0.00012105309,0.9164142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8675854,0.0032335045,0.0034856119,0.01599071,0.0024379797,0.00019433146,0.0001924297,0.00023689921,0.10664301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98602086,0.003550868,0.0006659217,0.0019951302,0.005423991,0.0023432511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863216,0.0052935225,0.0012729157,0.0034024161,0.002668599,0.0010409611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00869772,0.0010856283,0.00081589294,0.002705357,0.0061235093,0.012165568,0.0017872748,0.008195073,0.019543799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03106179,0.00069702073,0.001083404,0.0015852156,0.030553188,0.017688056,0.013808988,0.010732525,0.003907254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014406309,0.000015077968,0.00044500653,0.000031287836,0.000013189332,0.00023675492,0.0006029511,0.00021483697,0.00010839451,0.98541325,0.0068338206,0.006071058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028629222,0.000032167925,0.0009379505,0.00024279645,0.00003482872,0.00043156728,0.0009416364,0.0005155735,0.00042101077,0.8787269,0.11765377,0.000033089487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033942454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038535234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019543799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084163835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057263956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06538051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480390625","doi":"10.1522/cla.brj.tra","title":"trafic des plaidoyers dans la justice penale le verbe \"dealer\" de l'anglais \"to deal\"","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"Classiques des sciences sociales.","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09694706481474631,"score_gpt":0.2741256761465847,"score_spread":0.17717861133183838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480390625","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5527241,0.020289978,0.0010523476,0.098372884,0.0012052644,0.000039650673,0.0004698333,0.00004647798,0.3257994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8587831,0.0053162263,0.0001525382,0.00366968,0.0005602206,0.000025304265,0.00012951402,0.000030452176,0.13133298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982072,0.0005834221,0.000039058858,0.0001564112,0.0005124957,0.0005014666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980217,0.00075211615,0.00049753574,0.00004474714,0.00040985076,0.00027398247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008272282,0.00019244647,0.0002661704,0.0011484103,0.009149525,0.005692445,0.00048244005,0.003013048,0.010628572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004958771,0.00032797243,0.00018673377,0.0015618281,0.003679119,0.0018352694,0.0015570103,0.00387489,0.0013939914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002770501,0.00017471165,0.044597957,0.00027251864,0.0000566942,0.0023910252,0.12777095,0.0014858946,0.00081409555,0.37850213,0.3397306,0.103926405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034190154,0.00011624934,0.2070101,0.0010431923,0.00005783617,0.0017124652,0.12326211,0.002885946,0.0006531911,0.019153042,0.6439601,0.00011144897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20361383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3049163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20361383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005254002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035632388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40485728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2486034001","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n6p203","title":"The Effective Mistake in Iran Fiqh and Jurisprudence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Nullification; Element (criminal law); Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Law; Mathematical proof; Business; Political science; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01833066619684877,"score_gpt":0.22430374503297537,"score_spread":0.2059730788361266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2486034001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14037935,0.010307664,0.026632264,0.08117617,0.0013813482,0.00013984911,0.00010170932,0.00017674353,0.7397049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981217,0.0005152469,0.0033327744,0.0031698605,0.00032767668,0.00004423703,0.0000122011215,0.000023020759,0.0113579715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96459544,0.012338197,0.0020958907,0.0033106776,0.014145441,0.0035143208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798891,0.011790917,0.0017803949,0.002927684,0.00305707,0.00055476965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017749097,0.00042910682,0.0007305469,0.0021797547,0.009016755,0.008873086,0.0015854246,0.006590424,0.0020437313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031699277,0.00064573385,0.00072559324,0.0014143027,0.05837768,0.0066963835,0.004966478,0.008539594,0.00040299297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068323416,0.000005565169,0.00029817852,0.0000104452765,0.0000022344188,0.00004884301,0.0029973434,0.00011581195,0.00005474426,0.9925735,0.00095802033,0.0029283944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025929074,0.000051831226,0.0031753972,0.00008825041,0.000013117678,0.00030703173,0.0023454733,0.0016157709,0.00043230088,0.9224799,0.069414146,0.000050901243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0153405005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008834034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017749097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015608927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008757459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11325121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2487950638","doi":"10.29173/alr192","title":"Tendering and Purchasing Law in Upstream Oil, Gas, and Oilsands: The Competitive Bidding Process and Obligations When Contracting for Work","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Newsprint Company (Canada); Chevron (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Business; Procurement; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Purchasing; Liability; Creditor; Process (computing); Upstream (networking); Purchasing process; Industrial organization; Commerce; Finance; Marketing; Debt","score_opus":0.026615635419448544,"score_gpt":0.24656063147204302,"score_spread":0.2199449960525945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2487950638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11463313,0.028313767,0.03483847,0.041992523,0.0003223849,0.00017917575,0.00013065657,0.000076160875,0.77951384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93193555,0.008960601,0.005302018,0.0054469067,0.00024319394,0.00006619916,0.00006892848,0.00003676665,0.047939923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99046916,0.002932138,0.0003095406,0.00059325364,0.004348853,0.0013470512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98599976,0.010604458,0.00060944504,0.0004567271,0.0019596857,0.00037000506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009287408,0.0001527146,0.00030905323,0.00152036,0.0059092203,0.0080195125,0.0015513853,0.0041843955,0.004466357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019444374,0.00057230785,0.0002684652,0.0022228886,0.013409487,0.003296277,0.0015313479,0.003826139,0.000566425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007758182,0.000011006511,0.0005545522,0.000025316074,0.0000014237514,0.00017343611,0.000821341,0.00040303575,0.00011756581,0.98392314,0.0035833295,0.01037808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005016094,0.00006226166,0.0156108765,0.00058992667,0.000024546614,0.0005174372,0.006114289,0.0034743724,0.00090706756,0.7321149,0.24042563,0.000108495486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25654724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32936814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7434528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017904479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022867812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51010793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492518275","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n6p104","title":"Adaptive Evaluation of Civil Judgment Recession in Iran and French Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Verdict; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Voting; Recession; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.06170918163375864,"score_gpt":0.2595614459638248,"score_spread":0.19785226433006617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492518275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854365,0.0001763641,0.0009917341,0.0005924841,0.0000125762635,0.000034559358,0.00010654294,0.00001637152,0.012632954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999228,0.000025431887,0.00023227026,0.000027626358,0.0000071699596,0.000006221004,0.000057219073,0.0000017949429,0.0004143292],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963475,0.0016609305,0.0001505931,0.0003399534,0.0011152773,0.00038578972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857233,0.0052711037,0.0033037763,0.00046028465,0.004424183,0.0008174586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007026798,0.00018224928,0.0002914673,0.002116513,0.0008384902,0.0024053745,0.00036669298,0.0005972141,0.0025161086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026580261,0.000067703586,0.0002395185,0.0017542988,0.0014298884,0.0015042695,0.00085390045,0.00064338354,0.00014740352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086184585,0.00036620922,0.8534034,0.00009269605,0.00012766388,0.0006719479,0.01010641,0.014085432,0.0014781748,0.025491701,0.0053355894,0.087978944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023812669,0.00042638183,0.9422821,0.000036075067,0.000036965062,0.00012505284,0.009804098,0.034194883,0.0006454305,0.0071671493,0.005212278,0.000045765057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058410782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042556696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058410782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075382995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013404953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11614162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493572808","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107706798.004","title":"Confidence and corruption","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Internet privacy; Computer science; Computer security; Political science; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.032858830526653615,"score_gpt":0.17943132073436238,"score_spread":0.14657249020770877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493572808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04211532,0.022974247,0.0033334796,0.053927477,0.00061029,0.000024992121,0.0004702397,0.00004765699,0.87649626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9168717,0.011475769,0.0005152661,0.0033839706,0.0005728781,0.000027357471,0.00017519697,0.000043693733,0.066934265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985115,0.0006565884,0.000054592514,0.00014822627,0.00035664203,0.00027247207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943416,0.0032794904,0.00091996416,0.0004231708,0.0006195698,0.00041614872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002304314,0.00023422691,0.0003127398,0.0009030746,0.0010537992,0.004912976,0.00038576854,0.0013878847,0.02670047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015661377,0.0001349947,0.00022155662,0.0012626052,0.0039729625,0.0028448962,0.001591463,0.0022369695,0.0022487221],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003664322,0.000024928951,0.0033694825,0.00009402312,0.000016321013,0.00008205215,0.00095646916,0.00067222497,0.000045734276,0.90544564,0.040826213,0.048430227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017963688,0.000040625666,0.01752353,0.0008646456,0.000021333874,0.00034419142,0.0017281213,0.0015265356,0.000290736,0.8074112,0.17019618,0.000035048513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002099717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001902276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02670047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024195611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009926765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08932197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2497992681","doi":"10.4324/9780203946879-7","title":"Interjurisdictional competition in regulation: Evidence for Canada at the provincial level","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.11231422663811572,"score_gpt":0.24629942548781525,"score_spread":0.13398519884969953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2497992681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7414225,0.026172044,0.002911898,0.027563304,0.00019204638,0.000134348,0.008924172,0.00009451975,0.1925852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856346,0.004243985,0.00054097234,0.0012427989,0.000037344624,0.00001716,0.0012769968,0.000015447573,0.006990728],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930211,0.0005081317,0.0001956983,0.0005114096,0.003775569,0.0019881641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795455,0.0054458305,0.0041992776,0.0007303192,0.007903067,0.0021759795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002167696,0.00021093214,0.0006739895,0.0031030064,0.0064540375,0.004127456,0.0017175882,0.0010554333,0.005697408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014257017,0.00026546457,0.0006751659,0.01224399,0.0036579536,0.00090000406,0.0015241767,0.0017493629,0.00025511876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001990469,0.00011551326,0.6286719,0.00074668194,0.00036303297,0.0005375764,0.011067521,0.0034611674,0.00045582937,0.23567645,0.052010518,0.06669476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036866237,0.000045118482,0.9221358,0.0006660571,0.000276051,0.0001384745,0.007296791,0.0024206159,0.00053013593,0.009354976,0.05701904,0.0000802407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.993429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99746966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07038259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07038259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11033695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5106638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2501834317","doi":"10.29173/alr288","title":"Severance Pay and the Older Worker: Negotiated Versus Litigated Outcomes Under Canadian Common Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Severance; Notice; Dismissal; Law; Negotiation; Mandatory retirement; Common law; Age discrimination; Workforce; Business; Labour law; Labour economics; Political science; Economics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.04331187182457956,"score_gpt":0.24174614587101562,"score_spread":0.19843427404643604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2501834317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9065736,0.0011543323,0.00076265464,0.0050018374,0.00003665963,0.00017009539,0.0002971015,0.000013525841,0.085990205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99578744,0.00027424647,0.00011728274,0.00036569944,0.000015644633,0.000019095663,0.000064020336,0.0000034055772,0.0033531229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897259,0.001725579,0.00024439266,0.00058717455,0.0032743018,0.004442721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768068,0.011499781,0.0033803089,0.000733326,0.0046206294,0.0029591664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010594823,0.00036502027,0.00088391715,0.0019126012,0.01088277,0.008095706,0.0022698466,0.003438313,0.0075137457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04971942,0.00029117955,0.0005820187,0.0023777378,0.0068801274,0.0026198206,0.0030238316,0.0040842625,0.0004942022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015824577,0.0014513197,0.29149032,0.00023113603,0.00025194747,0.0024551952,0.03667353,0.02634212,0.0013050577,0.5320167,0.02598712,0.08021311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009207375,0.0011212964,0.5521021,0.0006475001,0.0005171155,0.00056199316,0.106434144,0.05810918,0.0016199958,0.20369776,0.07361399,0.0006541449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91241616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9423091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08758384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057893362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056786984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42004776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502198676","doi":"","title":"Perdu dans le labyrinthe et retrouvé dans le jardin: la problématique des clauses restrictives dans les contrats d’emploi dans les provinces de common law au Canada (Lost in the Labyrinth and Found in the Garden: The Issue of Restrictive Covenants in Employment Contracts in the Common Law Provinces in Canada)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013301826033221997,"score_gpt":0.2178791501315867,"score_spread":0.2045773240983647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502198676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8011562,0.010982215,0.0138437925,0.06204798,0.00022513505,0.00013491669,0.0014148381,0.0000758371,0.110119134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859585,0.0009423862,0.0014926487,0.0015694556,0.00002897391,0.000025931555,0.000107862936,0.000032818185,0.0098413965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883454,0.0022996343,0.00048266503,0.0011641249,0.0038156665,0.0038924885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839662,0.007865964,0.0016242323,0.00079771626,0.004564452,0.0011815258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010453049,0.00033116242,0.0009775287,0.0019593858,0.01850787,0.016361171,0.0036497407,0.0042039403,0.005095383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04157761,0.00073704147,0.00044135514,0.0050006686,0.015382542,0.0057172105,0.0037414618,0.007360487,0.000272076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013623244,0.000042606716,0.041987106,0.00012631528,0.000066290064,0.0006646065,0.07156608,0.002245182,0.00036970948,0.8327843,0.017645445,0.03236614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014150317,0.00009470475,0.1974677,0.0016936059,0.00030526408,0.00082334335,0.24414772,0.011412928,0.002529213,0.18717596,0.35374147,0.0004665734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9871724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99094653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065790325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065790325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11944896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47734445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2505796366","doi":"10.1108/s1475-1488(2013)0000016008","title":"The Effects of Offshoring Audit Tasks on Jurors’ Evaluations of Damage Awards Against Auditors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in accounting behavioral research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; East Carolina University; Library Company of Philadelphia","keywords":"Offshoring; Damages; Audit; Business; Accounting; Task (project management); Work (physics); Quality audit; Submarine pipeline; Marketing; Economics; Engineering; Outsourcing; Management; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0850494956180988,"score_gpt":0.37161464688413676,"score_spread":0.286565151266038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2505796366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98035884,0.00022570525,0.00066966034,0.0003647692,0.00007896907,0.00011576757,0.00007531546,0.000017026236,0.018093804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99552995,0.00012137714,0.000850891,0.00011543986,0.000029454475,0.00013030638,0.000069196016,0.000007428716,0.0031459618],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814906,0.010723534,0.0013682802,0.00078744197,0.0049870727,0.0006430743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7266353,0.21468365,0.036525927,0.0067950077,0.010295617,0.0050645834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016233912,0.00035418943,0.00052216137,0.0008048333,0.0011764035,0.0020698821,0.0008613889,0.0009319977,0.009115308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13416663,0.00026772852,0.00038947316,0.0006778725,0.0009785071,0.0011436538,0.0017096383,0.002051791,0.0010202092],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021860896,0.011726614,0.44844434,0.001065746,0.0006786301,0.0006304041,0.017358389,0.019256797,0.029618943,0.01037746,0.017181413,0.42180037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046045333,0.008660222,0.95580876,0.00048822138,0.00025479795,0.00017063896,0.008046635,0.008329153,0.0063930266,0.006816351,0.0043551605,0.00021661758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002179877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003958969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016233912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012068984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010806909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08585411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508998791","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1329","title":"Book Notes: Pay Without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation, by Lucien Bebchuk and Jesse Fried","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Executive compensation; Law and economics; Management; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.016908236143513816,"score_gpt":0.2078809954702145,"score_spread":0.1909727593267007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508998791","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000806722,0.055080004,0.001625692,0.7493598,0.0207215,0.000019221963,0.0004747565,0.000065440334,0.17184678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028451376,0.03920162,0.0017836737,0.24560021,0.03337638,0.00007705216,0.00033176944,0.00019525149,0.65098274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910957,0.00017592032,0.000045742167,0.00018601616,0.0003891315,0.00009366413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99616086,0.002624385,0.000142841,0.00015735635,0.0007695285,0.00014504007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001137509,0.00055665814,0.0005485213,0.00094060414,0.0028793253,0.0058000647,0.00094432745,0.008767809,0.020244172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007900142,0.00046349075,0.00027754682,0.0017363343,0.0041311127,0.007305533,0.0010773727,0.008982486,0.008512583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036622184,0.000005022956,0.00003908658,0.000010897503,0.0000010902196,0.000008363665,0.00005767776,0.00004518436,0.000010284669,0.062416717,0.9332912,0.004110914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008841531,0.0000060044963,0.00043593833,0.00019021846,0.0000038662897,0.00003566513,0.00020695332,0.00019092871,0.000081900616,0.09207475,0.9067442,0.000020708785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031058818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057270255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031058818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003734382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035313964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06772351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509825748","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2817172","title":"Sanctions Imposed for Insider Trading in Australia, Canada (Ontario), Hong Kong, Singapore, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States: An Empirical Study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Kingdom; Political science; Insider trading; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.06059679398887925,"score_gpt":0.27090212687099524,"score_spread":0.210305332882116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509825748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99682826,0.00017350457,0.000026062879,0.00013440807,0.0000057102643,0.0000068595223,0.0001689887,0.0000030254132,0.0026533047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832696,0.00016662382,0.000023446297,0.000056471286,0.0000057887673,0.0000030695983,0.00020671987,0.0000018994173,0.001208963],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829096,0.00028095063,0.00016863299,0.00011101332,0.0006179543,0.0005304148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9706435,0.0071011144,0.014950579,0.00048593993,0.0031157974,0.0037029178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011738065,0.00013854084,0.00034831092,0.001380028,0.0018052995,0.0023745776,0.00053118326,0.00071265956,0.0017725265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011710965,0.00023303495,0.00029877512,0.0026497548,0.0012793465,0.000821762,0.0009916187,0.0014665365,0.0002540476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022520912,0.00020685872,0.9787628,0.000041932417,0.000074515876,0.00068553566,0.005443057,0.00091141573,0.00024699498,0.002266412,0.003549884,0.0075854133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009371597,0.000033395972,0.9937696,0.000024045343,0.00002729196,0.000089408924,0.0036558667,0.000755546,0.000103991806,0.00015202098,0.0013626214,0.00001690237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7104264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85415393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2895736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007817968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006372212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5825579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514075402","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2830928","title":"Relational Contracts with Learning","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science; Knowledge management","score_opus":0.016289055549249944,"score_gpt":0.18696671681281632,"score_spread":0.17067766126356637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514075402","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.110207856,0.003379444,0.5488692,0.027724423,0.000406687,0.00026182234,0.00085827115,0.000485704,0.30780664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92935866,0.0010811393,0.022985382,0.0010071378,0.00049806235,0.00018249394,0.00022704354,0.000075286865,0.04458468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547297,0.0022017267,0.00022689278,0.0008600716,0.0007576607,0.00048055494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792574,0.013619012,0.0019343978,0.003163545,0.0009980368,0.0010275381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052673216,0.0007330994,0.001223042,0.0010051462,0.0024318288,0.006317486,0.0016535273,0.005340844,0.028610975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029592961,0.00064056786,0.0008462814,0.00163986,0.0062404815,0.014255596,0.0031275798,0.005482417,0.0020823663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010542454,0.000015815795,0.00013943507,0.000011729998,0.0000047770654,0.000023703475,0.00007032195,0.0009998931,0.000030378966,0.995544,0.000762566,0.002386832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009572943,0.000004303665,0.000060317354,0.0000070752176,0.0000030222825,0.00002105725,0.0000217394,0.004489447,0.000018098535,0.9940698,0.0012918243,0.0000036985168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024219563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001797189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028610975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034642844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020507777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09571326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515154138","doi":"","title":"Taking the Risk out of Termination: An Enterprise Risk Management Analysis of the Normative System of Employment Standards Challenged by Honda v Keays","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Normative; Bad faith; Misconduct; Jurisprudence; Damages; Supreme court; Law; Labour law; Sociology; Reflexivity; Risk management; Power (physics); Law and economics; Business; Economics; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.04137045731393904,"score_gpt":0.2589071898184129,"score_spread":0.21753673250447383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515154138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54836696,0.0019622075,0.040788125,0.05638975,0.00009966166,0.00016488018,0.000088240115,0.00008403975,0.3520561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932045,0.00021668061,0.0013458561,0.00091009395,0.000036795518,0.000017235632,0.0000064995465,0.000007806921,0.004254592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98876417,0.0025635543,0.00025604773,0.0009307807,0.0043988214,0.0030866934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944792,0.0021849754,0.00095951604,0.00043515774,0.0014675801,0.00047353937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00821515,0.00032627615,0.00043629154,0.0019121023,0.007215528,0.011333154,0.0027308722,0.0054995324,0.0016538374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0093017435,0.00033352608,0.00088123366,0.0008483859,0.020034935,0.0042989594,0.0038360532,0.0059780544,0.00016436433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012290471,0.000038733055,0.0017900942,0.000009360715,0.0000069025527,0.00024071551,0.00426373,0.002103835,0.00026542167,0.987033,0.00079672755,0.0034391824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041152147,0.000095300944,0.010841015,0.00020080233,0.00007436853,0.00016731562,0.012526124,0.02028493,0.0011790321,0.9257487,0.028710438,0.0001308072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22946638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1982362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22946638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031510465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025348669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45626146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W251568020","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1779834","title":"Repairing Social Damage Out of Corruption Cases: Opportunities and Challenges as Illustrated in the Alcatel Case in Costa Rica","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0886849283143635,"score_gpt":0.26045896447023,"score_spread":0.17177403615586648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W251568020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73274803,0.0025990512,0.008694969,0.043674804,0.00012395471,0.00031350792,0.00010533471,0.00016933715,0.211571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99270684,0.00040697437,0.00068358635,0.0010579358,0.000040739316,0.000041048304,0.000017572916,0.000013522179,0.005031757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.99412197,0.0025988033,0.00014740374,0.00031410405,0.00067124725,0.0021464708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899975,0.003905146,0.001556661,0.00187951,0.0013852757,0.0012759271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007775171,0.00039990956,0.00056173274,0.0024540443,0.010625368,0.008211515,0.002853333,0.006334835,0.004192143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020093586,0.00032965327,0.00060788065,0.0020830312,0.011285547,0.0038425361,0.00952518,0.0032286549,0.00039291446],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021725197,0.0007500169,0.07625664,0.00051843317,0.00024080578,0.013405079,0.06463543,0.016209507,0.0024416246,0.65638,0.033580016,0.13536522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032283337,0.0005156079,0.16790533,0.0020547868,0.00047920484,0.0053918445,0.18650903,0.03114091,0.004655389,0.3527394,0.24796975,0.00031588954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06528975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12697719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06528975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054506217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01269408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1298194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518440958","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2469931","title":"Executive Gatekeepers: Useful and Divertible Governance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Executive compensation; Executive summary; Political science; Process management","score_opus":0.011747965077790412,"score_gpt":0.18773765371883547,"score_spread":0.17598968864104506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518440958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39018127,0.0018167044,0.0881584,0.031601235,0.00043706212,0.00012712611,0.00015796088,0.0004922164,0.4870281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844757,0.00018458017,0.0017890501,0.0007454044,0.00012087955,0.00002561949,0.000016426337,0.000025258598,0.0126170935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547654,0.0019115289,0.00012695877,0.0006237584,0.0008472175,0.0010140548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99015474,0.004328591,0.0014723806,0.0020746517,0.00081684487,0.0011528173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004961178,0.00026958348,0.00032758742,0.0008767767,0.0019713917,0.007777227,0.0008446791,0.002383264,0.0075024636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018617611,0.00029855076,0.00021837716,0.00081552996,0.0051319143,0.005502167,0.003196586,0.0026842824,0.0008377224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003661701,0.000042353786,0.0040481873,0.000021171312,0.000012754808,0.00020730827,0.0012422452,0.0012069921,0.00040583726,0.956205,0.009296541,0.027274912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059369522,0.00005248224,0.004039475,0.00006667549,0.00003655028,0.00016677294,0.001297031,0.005680647,0.0009129844,0.93616486,0.05149645,0.000026844136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012692775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037876896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007777227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014783625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028175493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026237547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521331341","doi":"10.3386/w22632","title":"Efficiency-Morality Trade-Offs in Repugnant Transactions: A Choice Experiment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Mississauga; University of Toronto; Johns Hopkins University; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Morality; Business; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.28120336057902723,"score_gpt":0.4331547117577381,"score_spread":0.1519513511787109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521331341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98977846,0.00004467701,0.0028476892,0.0004202217,0.000086264394,0.0013452693,0.00019868258,0.000018068675,0.005260655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769952,0.000100995,0.012528013,0.00081773545,0.00011789598,0.0049743303,0.00018187892,0.000025017427,0.004259],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99102813,0.0058034724,0.00066120754,0.00097223936,0.0008781667,0.0006568282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90716106,0.07442599,0.0076902574,0.005855292,0.0014472486,0.0034201157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01804107,0.0011947209,0.001043914,0.00046530046,0.00140803,0.0031420444,0.0016754136,0.003871349,0.015515726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038293533,0.0007339428,0.00084046,0.00054334354,0.0034494856,0.003494821,0.0017224656,0.004402915,0.0015213782],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.22864866,0.40775052,0.048525304,0.002012202,0.0013654791,0.0015165573,0.011960692,0.029547712,0.084854476,0.09825316,0.0073067746,0.078258514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.11459775,0.3215027,0.07813918,0.0005282921,0.0019653998,0.00089716254,0.0061928495,0.18115233,0.04936539,0.21447447,0.030142553,0.0010418877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045095367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005503739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01804107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001121256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013947675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09541148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521398620","doi":"","title":"The Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics: Volume 3: Public Law and Legal Institutions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Schools of economic thought; Law; Comparative law; Public law; Sociology; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.07311780763546315,"score_gpt":0.2915165288624907,"score_spread":0.21839872122702753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521398620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015946764,0.34165952,0.0083829835,0.03190011,0.007636561,0.00017171206,0.0026157366,0.000598294,0.60544044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0334056,0.32518628,0.007912776,0.009688527,0.0075119627,0.0004473621,0.0031219104,0.00061190204,0.6121137],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977343,0.00049313734,0.00018645744,0.0002569307,0.0010940032,0.00023514009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714726,0.0014478936,0.00032534386,0.00026264612,0.00055110746,0.00026577254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012558552,0.0011518016,0.0010684619,0.004499119,0.0024101553,0.009810358,0.0013260994,0.0028383527,0.06570659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053600282,0.00081212743,0.00069493405,0.0075182235,0.0032132417,0.0076294546,0.0027271982,0.0037352832,0.01907857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018750308,0.000034433953,0.00051148474,0.0009383353,0.00001920776,0.000070692644,0.00083382166,0.00034817745,0.00015923557,0.22778031,0.6690481,0.10023747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027282867,0.000005013399,0.00044529056,0.0007464916,0.000004183985,0.00007666377,0.00019784756,0.000057062534,0.000029914869,0.034250416,0.964177,0.0000075263765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058275573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061983922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06570659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004853961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008580247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21981043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528926969","doi":"10.3138/9781442676169-006","title":"Learning Administrative Law from David Mullan: An Appreciation of Evans, Janisch, Mullan, and Risk, Administrative Law: Cases, Text, and Materials","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Administrative law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.039587499511658276,"score_gpt":0.21549188163947042,"score_spread":0.17590438212781215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528926969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019711594,0.07674779,0.0046598734,0.39060724,0.0053666127,0.00008968017,0.00035900646,0.0002653498,0.5199333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027850984,0.05005356,0.004495092,0.049559485,0.0027520591,0.00010945562,0.00029174052,0.0003606289,0.86452705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973093,0.0006488287,0.00007309528,0.00012324854,0.0016495959,0.0001959049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99563885,0.0017978972,0.00014431273,0.00013009275,0.0016349743,0.0006538341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024264108,0.000542432,0.00042804418,0.0020013438,0.005771536,0.0060959645,0.001337259,0.0033078762,0.028065838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00780405,0.00057463633,0.00021423983,0.002835803,0.004538925,0.0077807717,0.00258411,0.004375148,0.0076069566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003932575,0.0000129764785,0.000055654586,0.000033865843,7.2801265e-7,0.000069379996,0.0013973059,0.00004260004,0.000052909225,0.029744618,0.9453542,0.023231784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021194078,0.0000028910556,0.00018371658,0.0001044484,9.0178406e-7,0.000067621135,0.00102367,0.000030390767,0.00006345407,0.006916633,0.99159676,0.0000074334994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17770976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42299613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17770976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013059422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013555051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35335076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529766669","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3061","title":"Book Note: Law, Psychology, And Morality: The Role Of Loss Aversion, by Eyal Zamir","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loss aversion; Irrational number; Morality; Psychology; Social psychology; Positive economics; Economics; Law; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.014494702549400346,"score_gpt":0.22334494247937103,"score_spread":0.20885023992997068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529766669","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011564143,0.24999437,0.005054277,0.56218684,0.02826835,0.000032517328,0.00035768468,0.00008356609,0.152866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07809268,0.25046486,0.0073542455,0.18054928,0.10506976,0.00017804344,0.0004649194,0.00034668946,0.37747958],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995553,0.00012396592,0.000018480356,0.000104009465,0.00017353462,0.000024715631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711394,0.002126965,0.00011456216,0.00008433921,0.00044770676,0.00011237548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008883672,0.000788187,0.00064900535,0.001067136,0.0014853453,0.0032112843,0.00082251686,0.0032507079,0.011067222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038900417,0.0003797495,0.00037668276,0.0017445334,0.00414714,0.0059088394,0.0010177623,0.006907782,0.004462498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001360509,0.000016157644,0.00021636015,0.00006078538,0.0000058087476,0.00002989527,0.00011922796,0.00034487515,0.000054964526,0.12741114,0.8534746,0.018252583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012714588,0.00001211299,0.00076729764,0.00029080373,0.0000075275416,0.00009268051,0.00013258826,0.0005497615,0.00006693248,0.18830384,0.8097427,0.00002102215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005356255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006532336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011067222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021405984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017891362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037023485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532702816","doi":"10.1111/faf.12185","title":"Effort rights‐based management","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fish and Fisheries","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada; University of California, San Diego; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; International Seafood Sustainability Foundation; Norges Forskningsråd; Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea; University of Oxford; National Marine Fisheries Service; Brown University","keywords":"Business; Process management; Computer science","score_opus":0.018434337268872194,"score_gpt":0.17934314349231864,"score_spread":0.16090880622344644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532702816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044179764,0.0017692543,0.15728302,0.008082666,0.00039484803,0.00041880223,0.000466728,0.00037621293,0.7870286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8670672,0.00082197273,0.024338175,0.0017430395,0.0005268239,0.00041062417,0.0003010805,0.00012608932,0.10466503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992358,0.00214432,0.0005141367,0.0013517726,0.0027738689,0.00085785927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910699,0.0021424496,0.001803757,0.0019468375,0.0023052336,0.0007317977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074395053,0.0006827442,0.00039310273,0.002137074,0.0012324549,0.0048419875,0.0022666156,0.0016111325,0.021531722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014468841,0.00024811958,0.0005405848,0.0013157254,0.00312718,0.0048530884,0.003973623,0.0020984507,0.0022173454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003758173,0.00009006502,0.0051932572,0.00009429304,0.000041541578,0.00005317755,0.00037135865,0.005417341,0.0008022969,0.84306556,0.009809514,0.13502398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007841821,0.0003643943,0.015423591,0.0006033455,0.00008441617,0.000284544,0.00067605585,0.033473164,0.0025776227,0.6286592,0.31767052,0.000104851926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033111037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035908716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021531722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002480525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028838548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07203084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2539973771","doi":"10.1016/s0924-977x(16)30963-4","title":"Which factors determine publication rates of clinical trials and how can these rates be improved?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Neuropsychopharmacology","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Arbitration; Ideology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Politics; Phenomenon; Law; Political science; Psychology; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Positive economics; Economics; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.14331675785005982,"score_gpt":0.35656355217664776,"score_spread":0.21324679432658794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2539973771","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10558557,0.41259357,0.19929661,0.2216846,0.0109971985,0.002436672,0.012107719,0.003367686,0.03193039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79987824,0.053806096,0.10084865,0.022952467,0.013122642,0.0018868006,0.0033329446,0.0012386339,0.0029334335],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.5851479,0.2665615,0.07768603,0.025828745,0.040297534,0.0044783214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.073790215,0.68014455,0.14736664,0.055471517,0.040008787,0.003218184],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5024164,0.0013154435,0.0048507974,0.011175101,0.0014696718,0.012702832,0.004465278,0.005912591,0.006999443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8214258,0.0017992585,0.005285705,0.013683781,0.0043919636,0.014134588,0.0036374708,0.006276475,0.0040598465],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034534784,0.0002746791,0.35750875,0.007117907,0.011105422,0.00040588164,0.0020941643,0.0067675915,0.0007785822,0.036396585,0.033467125,0.54062986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027287502,0.0025899343,0.55932665,0.014733073,0.019573761,0.0045230575,0.0021554974,0.029843511,0.008232085,0.24689256,0.10830642,0.0010946661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002592778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015007335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49758363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045641353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005724851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6136092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548100719","doi":"","title":"THE NOVA SCOTIA RESTORATIVE JUSTICE INITIATIVE: CORE DATA ANALYSES: YEAR TWO EVALUATION REPORT","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Core (optical fiber); Political science; Geography; Computer science; Archaeology; Aeronautics; Engineering","score_opus":0.3743923469155186,"score_gpt":0.39668058078995133,"score_spread":0.02228823387443274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548100719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64644563,0.0012316726,0.0032814234,0.009765677,0.00045200906,0.02190977,0.27657762,0.00072331284,0.039612904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6800817,0.00080419105,0.011226705,0.006535296,0.00031384366,0.018762043,0.2264319,0.00040036763,0.055443965],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9729776,0.010522577,0.00094265945,0.0013710199,0.0122791305,0.0019070513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88967294,0.021912383,0.010280258,0.007850047,0.061200485,0.009083879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030440146,0.0011524392,0.001528075,0.0040091355,0.003323178,0.0034726933,0.0034453163,0.002392152,0.0056509976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06066998,0.001017856,0.0011632844,0.0055767116,0.0016332344,0.0016453351,0.0040500714,0.0021021222,0.0021518255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017396498,0.005515185,0.41837287,0.0012853633,0.001780845,0.0006029754,0.0031483644,0.0112600215,0.0024735976,0.0029539838,0.46078953,0.07442079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031070283,0.0014572024,0.96161026,0.00018516103,0.0005011783,0.00005981287,0.0013674549,0.00362354,0.0011627297,0.0002635607,0.02656483,0.000097271135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82907146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8859649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98324686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016753122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04250517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34387028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550835373","doi":"","title":"THE NOVA SCOTIA RESTORATIVE JUSTICE INITIATIVE: CORE PROCESSES REPORT YEAR TWO EVALUATION REPORT","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Political science; Core (optical fiber); Geography; Archaeology; Engineering; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.13254748911939637,"score_gpt":0.3211734789663845,"score_spread":0.1886259898469881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550835373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37756518,0.0031434824,0.0038873209,0.041999534,0.002327475,0.06585123,0.108649775,0.0011390776,0.39543694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64371514,0.0021660372,0.009020104,0.027794711,0.0007375097,0.02387864,0.04353416,0.00034226154,0.24881141],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98062354,0.004328028,0.00042444293,0.0009250223,0.010973275,0.002725721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94683063,0.0061638732,0.0026694562,0.0021823454,0.030726338,0.011427362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0144479545,0.0010360063,0.0011854537,0.0026785247,0.0057137306,0.00515484,0.003163551,0.0044215675,0.020226369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029135272,0.00085528597,0.0009192514,0.002161967,0.0019527328,0.002023971,0.0049745482,0.0030606582,0.0034328653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01615622,0.007706687,0.05008047,0.0020624378,0.00052851654,0.00041473118,0.0025605967,0.0041403743,0.0033564472,0.0075279716,0.75488967,0.15057594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013853826,0.009382544,0.72541773,0.001189796,0.00089702656,0.00019142742,0.003639873,0.0027955235,0.004690514,0.002322026,0.23540597,0.00021373571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.650181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.855495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.349819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023574453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.089190125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7037583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553568374","doi":"","title":"Les premiers pas de la procédure technologique : regard technologique sur le nouveau Code de procédure civile","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.014033065439359445,"score_gpt":0.2075817452061445,"score_spread":0.19354867976678505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553568374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1510143,0.004937866,0.052120905,0.038085066,0.0013315845,0.00015032182,0.0006547516,0.00030129045,0.7514039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73729336,0.002857413,0.020750677,0.00450109,0.0011288378,0.00022092919,0.0003137307,0.00025133352,0.23268268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900564,0.0024159795,0.00052705867,0.0010910777,0.0042480226,0.0016614281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98207766,0.009513749,0.0018971182,0.0020163464,0.0035877314,0.00090739055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005214627,0.000426098,0.00042319452,0.002284209,0.006137089,0.011954501,0.000997284,0.0058962563,0.007970195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026945693,0.00055604806,0.0007236024,0.0019526455,0.0051820353,0.0046400265,0.0015740372,0.008995642,0.0026443151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018005228,0.000015240424,0.0011603131,0.000015321713,0.000003891142,0.0001225539,0.0010930388,0.00014950131,0.00049580284,0.97997516,0.0053796,0.0115716215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033850985,0.00013725598,0.017491255,0.00035934377,0.000038564074,0.0010984337,0.0018413558,0.0021526276,0.006409687,0.32140893,0.64891994,0.000108797845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028298384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027682038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028298384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005026935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0125914505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05626732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557497414","doi":"","title":"UNDERSTANDING PARTICIPATION IN SHARING ECONOMY: THE ROLES OF CONVENIENCE, RISK, AND REGULATORY FOC I","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sharing economy; Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07772835005713204,"score_gpt":0.2318668090457607,"score_spread":0.15413845898862866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557497414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67851424,0.000444338,0.17484228,0.008955691,0.00007278616,0.00013135113,0.0002402168,0.0000717306,0.13672741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957147,0.00008144902,0.0015516818,0.000071259725,0.000035526493,0.000024067951,0.00001961183,0.000007283139,0.0024943172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997644,0.0012704744,0.000096372096,0.00030077118,0.00020492589,0.0004834328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855661,0.009731682,0.0016084074,0.0013240508,0.0006934239,0.0010764155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005232062,0.00038339008,0.0010082936,0.00073783734,0.0019122016,0.0057062996,0.0013763248,0.002674836,0.018253641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011481969,0.0003568432,0.00095422205,0.0007844185,0.005292282,0.010629088,0.0031975643,0.0022014722,0.000607792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006402168,0.00011752368,0.0030870698,0.00002847661,0.000016782034,0.00007578216,0.0007295855,0.008157686,0.00022401217,0.98235947,0.0007794972,0.0043600034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003387857,0.00003740015,0.0013927273,0.000020366288,0.000020566584,0.000037411995,0.0009479631,0.031589437,0.00016441729,0.9638543,0.0018861427,0.000015283904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041214605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026843906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018253641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021413616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018856728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06106454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560130696","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2876942","title":"The Supreme Court's Aboriginal Rights Cases &amp; Canada's Resource Industries: Estimating the Economic Effects","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Resource (disambiguation); Promotion (chess); Natural resource; Business; Economics; Law; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.011145012160434231,"score_gpt":0.21425258826543306,"score_spread":0.20310757610499883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560130696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9369453,0.0014282205,0.0015014401,0.005213269,0.0000669367,0.00018732014,0.007596131,0.000045654,0.04701577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97718656,0.00089413044,0.0008535726,0.0003959417,0.00005370557,0.000057959853,0.0031572238,0.00001837545,0.017382586],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968822,0.0006720088,0.000097849595,0.0002531293,0.0010772746,0.0010176355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816031,0.011802393,0.0017647608,0.00048073416,0.0028916402,0.0014575511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043002395,0.00046380394,0.0007081804,0.0032255505,0.004868235,0.0045740115,0.0023783988,0.0019647428,0.0076725665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028245509,0.00052237936,0.0007341047,0.0054443,0.0020102656,0.0015031176,0.0015338375,0.00411624,0.00055230124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005669002,0.0007177958,0.7156371,0.00029619358,0.0006802627,0.0009398612,0.0038871584,0.069392286,0.00023242737,0.0977154,0.06564596,0.044288594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020388025,0.00019787514,0.79478914,0.000289651,0.0010316337,0.0001610938,0.015160734,0.11871881,0.0009975911,0.021362482,0.04695649,0.00013065085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99254286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99433374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044668324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044668324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05275497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32409286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561008313","doi":"","title":"Evolution of the Judiciary: Political Cycles in Judicial Exits from the U.S. Courts of Appeals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Presidential system; Presidential election; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); History","score_opus":0.0415788834187353,"score_gpt":0.2813418494648978,"score_spread":0.2397629660461625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561008313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99321705,0.0005243545,0.00024397262,0.00071771,0.000025875039,0.000016808332,0.0020404398,0.000010920765,0.0032027436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99505806,0.00015821157,0.00006659594,0.00009960614,0.000044069224,0.000012723943,0.0029992545,0.000008272097,0.0015532649],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978987,0.00045280147,0.00023686315,0.00053692097,0.00043246357,0.00044227648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97441226,0.007149615,0.012884972,0.0008124148,0.0022280088,0.00251268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030168535,0.00018402304,0.0005164367,0.0022132199,0.0007490609,0.0026698236,0.00087066554,0.0011356529,0.004318455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021651262,0.0003020338,0.00038582683,0.00293186,0.0005921464,0.0013270716,0.0013528062,0.0021309329,0.001181772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000143102,0.00010392184,0.98941797,0.000016648279,0.00007046882,0.000084664905,0.00067033764,0.00068347866,0.00014838607,0.00084075285,0.0021035606,0.0057167485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008140531,0.000031015363,0.99637645,0.000014744056,0.000013075197,0.000035196266,0.0004867409,0.0011439378,0.00007872189,0.0003222642,0.001480333,0.000009382131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035204284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063888066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035204284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016567679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079699344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06999874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562963395","doi":"10.1111/lest.12145","title":"Exercising discretion in the context of dependent employment: assessing the impact of workload on the rule of law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Workload; Rule of law; Public law; Law; Government (linguistics); Accountability; Private law; Political science; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.07023885008892738,"score_gpt":0.3025441416311244,"score_spread":0.23230529154219703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562963395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99946624,0.000027862983,0.000027442833,0.000031355557,0.0000012156848,0.000004408833,0.000012884615,3.6220843e-7,0.00042837454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998227,0.00002692495,0.00003110496,0.000009784361,0.0000025182871,0.0000033429212,0.000023042236,5.00841e-7,0.000080254984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978707,0.00081370486,0.00009478159,0.00018050533,0.00049769017,0.00054261216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860897,0.0037867697,0.0049563893,0.0007204282,0.0011467418,0.003299981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019922412,0.00028449163,0.0003666708,0.00093657,0.0017267533,0.002199255,0.00089074555,0.0006849679,0.001138918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013388439,0.000287469,0.00025752228,0.0007406633,0.0022436716,0.000641731,0.0020890187,0.001020198,0.0002510867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020717905,0.0006487699,0.9804047,0.000021493353,0.000043205753,0.00016536415,0.009308066,0.00028287788,0.0009773459,0.0002369254,0.00012017014,0.0075839376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033523727,0.00009451663,0.9941326,0.000007065523,0.000006089816,0.000023309925,0.00518752,0.00022065363,0.00006711008,0.00009738411,0.00015327436,0.0000071524505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12378967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24792545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12378967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028079012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028448284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24613827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563766404","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1178","title":"Book Notes: Making Your Case: the Art of Persuading Judges, by Antonin Scalia and Brian A. Garner","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.042593843413834556,"score_gpt":0.23174252428369804,"score_spread":0.18914868086986347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563766404","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001177312,0.09377868,0.006408839,0.5018703,0.017072475,0.000049564445,0.00031604595,0.00019591756,0.37913087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03574121,0.06833821,0.0069027017,0.09604643,0.018506356,0.00012613848,0.0002542089,0.00040795427,0.77367675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925286,0.00026939146,0.000031672596,0.00009354276,0.00030522794,0.00004735158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581546,0.003064587,0.00012901514,0.00013942613,0.00066536415,0.00018617022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015307617,0.0006093503,0.0003958164,0.0011612732,0.004128628,0.0055833026,0.0010751248,0.0037341004,0.03582653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007716047,0.00050398055,0.00026236736,0.0016060692,0.006085933,0.0074602766,0.0012013258,0.0062646638,0.012733001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004188504,0.000006436675,0.000043974695,0.00002980455,0.000001101347,0.000016739723,0.0004780212,0.00005772872,0.000030306983,0.04948588,0.9377915,0.012054331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007418521,0.0000070478363,0.00031739913,0.00027947282,0.0000035224248,0.00007490569,0.0010216078,0.00017910446,0.00011934673,0.06857503,0.9293991,0.000016059208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018113434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054284476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03582653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002439573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002386872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11985171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2564516472","doi":"","title":"Child Saving Accounts: A Cross-National Comparison of Polices in Canada and the United States","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2015 Fall Conference: The Golden Age of Evidence-Based Policy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.15168318891767257,"score_gpt":0.32525075217918775,"score_spread":0.17356756326151518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2564516472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852926,0.00070514967,0.00006339572,0.0014000757,0.000020244584,0.000035682955,0.006057777,0.000013539924,0.0064114574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99296653,0.00089674914,0.000076437755,0.00021489902,0.0000086051305,0.000014852006,0.0036754706,0.000011696617,0.0021346605],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825114,0.00014076587,0.000074193755,0.00010321394,0.0006112299,0.0008194928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914056,0.00078106,0.0016523739,0.00019069933,0.0047034346,0.0012668913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011212598,0.00023179557,0.0005478183,0.0042835725,0.004312339,0.0036655765,0.001757955,0.00093550293,0.0034122015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0085612,0.0004162119,0.00049616717,0.0123481145,0.0011412575,0.0013626115,0.002148521,0.0013819403,0.00036516905],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018954278,0.000081895756,0.9675685,0.00005002369,0.00013916158,0.00016567396,0.008091687,0.00047678777,0.00008067708,0.0021447872,0.009982899,0.011028328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052403716,0.00001082948,0.9816207,0.000044393964,0.000034748187,0.000030158903,0.0134242205,0.00038897316,0.0000574126,0.00006977467,0.004298103,0.000015395686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99474996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03133022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03133022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03688957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22731775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572130664","doi":"","title":"The ‘Hart’ of the (Mr.) Big Problem","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Test (biology); Point (geometry); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.021403821483433165,"score_gpt":0.20275699554249632,"score_spread":0.18135317405906315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572130664","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0456522,0.012993694,0.026542015,0.61589324,0.0043650526,0.000115309056,0.00035446527,0.00016752651,0.2939164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71311593,0.0030413177,0.0087711485,0.22434682,0.0024526874,0.00008308776,0.000085250926,0.00013296977,0.04797073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98849106,0.0037647681,0.0003547573,0.0016426089,0.004273768,0.0014730754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98229825,0.011606643,0.0006761052,0.0011868867,0.0035314166,0.0007005598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012971138,0.00037681998,0.0006562793,0.0012519218,0.007038236,0.0077222413,0.0019340881,0.009323445,0.004432212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026322423,0.00050233316,0.0008811451,0.0013311553,0.031761725,0.008483013,0.0031747918,0.015348671,0.00067750603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017853677,0.0000060798325,0.00036240742,0.00003194424,0.000007186648,0.00016880961,0.0011899553,0.00012915794,0.000101839745,0.9354821,0.05392095,0.008581723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030062018,0.000055709443,0.0017292241,0.00026272875,0.000032685148,0.00036555828,0.002792771,0.0009453775,0.00094484125,0.61934555,0.37340572,0.00008971891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09058451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12914021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09058451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00940542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0145852035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18011451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572666151","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3190","title":"Effecting a Culture Shift—An Empirical Review of Ontario’s Summary Judgment Reforms","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Aside; Order (exchange); Civil procedure; Political science; Law; Empirical research; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.05005396733443864,"score_gpt":0.2769881842643322,"score_spread":0.22693421692989355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572666151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72222424,0.15577084,0.0005971558,0.022874225,0.00038603196,0.00044437245,0.008464021,0.000057747242,0.08918138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89797735,0.09060474,0.0005620215,0.0025405542,0.00013898556,0.00010176113,0.0020912003,0.000035388846,0.005947994],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98970383,0.0012631804,0.00079871394,0.0005883021,0.0060291644,0.0016168269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91473144,0.016895935,0.01331533,0.0022181922,0.047635697,0.005203405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075124656,0.00022990422,0.00064768555,0.005258397,0.005403934,0.0044548507,0.0014447523,0.0007708696,0.0024157797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033514205,0.00037420815,0.0005865244,0.01913872,0.0032455223,0.0017414661,0.0013997148,0.001123435,0.00020117481],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048721372,0.00025530375,0.461494,0.013278463,0.0006475802,0.0011030991,0.08735177,0.0015473877,0.0015238997,0.027627142,0.08520324,0.31948084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020726526,0.00007008465,0.82345635,0.0032777498,0.00021736228,0.00011258982,0.019254247,0.00022068819,0.00031327584,0.0003104501,0.15267132,0.00007512813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98978966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13428834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13428834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2242167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97433466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2579902802","doi":"10.7202/1038621ar","title":"La notion d’économie du contrat en droit français et québécois","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.015041572389838925,"score_gpt":0.2082785913967863,"score_spread":0.1932370190069474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2579902802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068088554,0.024492083,0.031713456,0.054408703,0.0009952452,0.00008432841,0.000850359,0.000067781046,0.8192995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8566863,0.007905029,0.006239426,0.004979357,0.00037850582,0.000088305285,0.00023151467,0.00005343252,0.123438135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978947,0.00051542465,0.000060130915,0.00044267328,0.00065295526,0.0004342174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986539,0.0003504665,0.00014174063,0.00012818933,0.0005798107,0.00014584996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016519019,0.0005551708,0.00040675685,0.0022008563,0.0067999535,0.008603533,0.0010532937,0.0030734448,0.010236522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002614399,0.00025601083,0.0005148815,0.0027929551,0.019430503,0.003658077,0.0019200186,0.0036986766,0.0007367335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040917457,0.0000017322138,0.00037966904,0.000015127475,0.0000036453318,0.000028270118,0.0010415495,0.00012365806,0.000073111834,0.9938461,0.001999284,0.0024836697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019178719,0.000027170576,0.009691636,0.00056928647,0.00003777135,0.00023219445,0.0051419735,0.0010650059,0.00048491856,0.42035997,0.5622787,0.00009216958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68793285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7436504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31206715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035077635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023265202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62780994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2579923795","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3031","title":"Book Review: Civil Justice, Privatization, and Democracy by Trevor C. W. Farrow","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01414602692540557,"score_gpt":0.20975755868437593,"score_spread":0.19561153175897036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2579923795","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006144266,0.901427,0.00015802211,0.057157643,0.030276846,0.000013413344,0.00023065237,0.000024463752,0.010650616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016624398,0.87752813,0.00019950198,0.020541139,0.04195517,0.000043460255,0.00038233158,0.00005536052,0.05763254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990446,0.00018785395,0.00006069771,0.00013223491,0.0004999535,0.000074624004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99307054,0.003438505,0.0005036388,0.0001230634,0.0023661861,0.0004979773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012023544,0.0012249249,0.0018010536,0.003904035,0.00083461136,0.003575001,0.0015608729,0.00350516,0.030281726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007632615,0.0006230818,0.0005233248,0.0077970964,0.0013884639,0.0034626583,0.0011610382,0.0047168937,0.016975798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004674364,0.0000028135914,0.000026325179,0.00025740665,0.0000047192907,0.000005619635,0.000007429253,0.000037934402,0.000007216484,0.0011723262,0.9834878,0.014985745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010731173,0.000007923137,0.00029030992,0.0013951964,0.000011469515,0.000049679722,0.000026672482,0.000040062445,0.00001593039,0.0021749814,0.9959688,0.000008278446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015378116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03510791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030281726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003748085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005770239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101302445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590841658","doi":"10.11575/prism/34093","title":"Key Concepts: Administrative Law from A to Z","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Administrative law; Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Public administration; Computer science; Computer security; Sociology","score_opus":0.028308058446227205,"score_gpt":0.21753672878251384,"score_spread":0.18922867033628665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590841658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021225968,0.009851474,0.043202374,0.030427169,0.0022093996,0.00022825102,0.0006890186,0.00029658806,0.9109731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49148205,0.025402226,0.045748685,0.03804028,0.015629822,0.0028328048,0.0015628265,0.00066410523,0.3786372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933503,0.0025880698,0.0005039566,0.0012865699,0.0016044494,0.0006666125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992543,0.00428197,0.0006400477,0.0008334528,0.0013488358,0.0003527979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051475414,0.00085645745,0.00068452617,0.0025793063,0.0061460007,0.015414265,0.0024841642,0.00557947,0.04932542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010918027,0.0006158175,0.00071895175,0.004086994,0.018096514,0.018310484,0.00407987,0.008444105,0.017781246],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018712825,0.0000034391478,0.000018013181,0.000019366298,7.2286855e-7,0.000011983731,0.00009767978,0.000033190317,0.00001220737,0.98685515,0.01110643,0.0018400052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011189091,0.00001199334,0.00011295562,0.00014331519,0.000002611892,0.000085275395,0.00028067033,0.000303468,0.0000351803,0.6345489,0.3644568,0.0000076309525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007727904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027396164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04932542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008583587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059612244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16500998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2590918633","doi":"10.1111/jels.12140","title":"Unintended Consequences: The Regressive Effects of Increased Access to Courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Unintended consequences; Legislature; Damages; Law; Business; Trial court; Economics; Political science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.12183951220767718,"score_gpt":0.35964508921304755,"score_spread":0.23780557700537036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2590918633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9355106,0.0019036977,0.005018159,0.009277797,0.00010554682,0.00011887676,0.0018541813,0.00011566883,0.046095602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953667,0.00028018883,0.00042815958,0.00049255753,0.00004632682,0.00002051056,0.00010560696,0.0000138911155,0.003246211],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946714,0.001653344,0.00045812508,0.00097196334,0.0011721537,0.0010730132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93595487,0.026922643,0.02426808,0.007541867,0.003168407,0.0021440475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003827684,0.00030071725,0.0005939772,0.00095435657,0.0014866762,0.0022438446,0.0013776926,0.0012468351,0.017944172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042560562,0.00040156083,0.0010155273,0.0010508753,0.003444547,0.0023560456,0.002588884,0.0027389275,0.0006718686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005048072,0.00069813,0.8999875,0.00021146527,0.00059531385,0.0016667728,0.0019315652,0.009808114,0.0019310615,0.031648334,0.00541443,0.045602445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060954437,0.0003162436,0.96185976,0.00012763744,0.00024759685,0.00035565076,0.0014594812,0.0049121007,0.0018350078,0.020957537,0.0078094006,0.000058702382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07285901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12818573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07285901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031607507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023255167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14486986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2591231652","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1332116","title":"Should Courts Always Enforce What Contracting Parties Write?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Pooling; Ex-ante; Business; Private information retrieval; Interim; Welfare; Veil of ignorance; Outcome (game theory); Law and economics; Information asymmetry; Law; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Economic Justice; Computer security; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.02973742055736527,"score_gpt":0.23294409024087492,"score_spread":0.20320666968350964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2591231652","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09150488,0.003981009,0.07609211,0.49745348,0.0037019884,0.00042719112,0.0003051037,0.00049237674,0.32604194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79969573,0.0013502074,0.024731932,0.13571423,0.0025756222,0.00047003047,0.00012582297,0.00039056301,0.034945834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9418102,0.025639173,0.0044909995,0.0072465125,0.011922149,0.008891081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79966027,0.11321863,0.018790437,0.027787171,0.031845227,0.008698294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06622588,0.0005246981,0.0016404877,0.001341701,0.009637592,0.015284844,0.0038594236,0.019611958,0.008649909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2440255,0.0014389909,0.00079461525,0.0016125076,0.014133485,0.017084315,0.0040625003,0.01960521,0.0038021798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105793464,0.0002466631,0.007997569,0.00019573266,0.000124776,0.000238871,0.0072695008,0.000802794,0.0015444654,0.8441045,0.0764075,0.060961798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016379578,0.00005045676,0.0059492327,0.0006138342,0.00009407345,0.00016651978,0.0055018812,0.00240221,0.0027332979,0.88342166,0.098758206,0.0001448523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009513989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013894799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06622588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004094538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0155965425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3502401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592745997","doi":"10.21991/c9w383","title":"Reforming Rowbotham: Towards Fairer Financial Eligibility Standards for State-Funded Counsel in Criminal Trials","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Position (finance); State (computer science); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Accounting; Business; Economics; Finance; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.08090724780616793,"score_gpt":0.3228051050623508,"score_spread":0.24189785725618285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592745997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13385575,0.004301904,0.13369659,0.34861183,0.002746818,0.00073918846,0.0003176946,0.0005097757,0.3752204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85849845,0.000900425,0.04629414,0.05772154,0.00082928303,0.0007033246,0.00007176135,0.00008915824,0.03489189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95092815,0.026377248,0.0023650704,0.005451058,0.009765098,0.005113356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94667435,0.03690604,0.004218713,0.004423988,0.005428602,0.0023482277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06450986,0.00072353525,0.0011156842,0.0027544457,0.006950539,0.022282574,0.0051977593,0.02205901,0.007102818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16723384,0.0010594871,0.000928495,0.0016988767,0.0142770605,0.017651217,0.012016943,0.021159919,0.0014729896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025171988,0.000027077527,0.0005498079,0.000033429747,0.000008848697,0.00008392032,0.0011637623,0.00047649883,0.00015341135,0.98050517,0.0070881452,0.009884718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018727638,0.00016870289,0.0020432859,0.0006008186,0.00007339305,0.00018082751,0.0017726913,0.006226086,0.0014869737,0.89126503,0.09584325,0.00015158541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015567971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035676647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06450986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009714291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027751042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34116483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593899127","doi":"10.17118/11143/9932","title":"Développements récents : les ordonnances d’injonction de type Anton Piller, Mareva et Norwich en matière de fraude commerciale","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.01589810472549449,"score_gpt":0.20580209048416973,"score_spread":0.18990398575867523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593899127","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034848433,0.54563844,0.02902034,0.11896325,0.009845949,0.00022100461,0.008157287,0.00038890523,0.2529164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26577738,0.5417909,0.030651262,0.010196183,0.0073199854,0.00023466478,0.008534929,0.0003481356,0.13514654],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99223316,0.001784716,0.0008139674,0.00095088047,0.0036651385,0.00055211864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9372028,0.022411263,0.006585526,0.0031070004,0.028954713,0.0017386907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011864407,0.0007397869,0.00082478585,0.0095538935,0.0016177624,0.0109517705,0.0017797957,0.0027746721,0.022767505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053274553,0.0007034416,0.0009900857,0.011927778,0.0026626468,0.008088743,0.0017194157,0.0039600274,0.003942202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016613952,0.00011284624,0.015803734,0.0013162857,0.000067333975,0.00042949262,0.0019579034,0.001679991,0.00043615216,0.21244338,0.15404016,0.6115466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020541429,0.00007472675,0.028932955,0.0020986446,0.000061750914,0.0012557408,0.001220569,0.0010744049,0.0012298933,0.024297442,0.93965256,0.000080798025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054027945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040085673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9459721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077469624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009086102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10742694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594006143","doi":"10.1017/beq.2016.77","title":"The Problem of Unilateralism in Agency Theory: Towards a Bilateral Formulation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Agency (philosophy); Unilateralism; Argument (complex analysis); Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Epistemology; Law and economics; Principal–agent problem; Sociology; Moral hazard; Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Microeconomics; Politics; Incentive","score_opus":0.06799479555579228,"score_gpt":0.2714001653646418,"score_spread":0.2034053698088495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594006143","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024395373,0.0012607789,0.70670205,0.06746753,0.0007784876,0.00012724189,0.000069084155,0.0001001287,0.19909929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9233508,0.0007020289,0.06207965,0.0042100507,0.00080898986,0.00030126682,0.000032584292,0.000076608194,0.008438052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9670323,0.019936638,0.0014304018,0.003535181,0.0067094583,0.0013560136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96343154,0.01961531,0.0032749684,0.0060623246,0.0059363893,0.0016795581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03655142,0.00068479043,0.0012004675,0.001615539,0.004194485,0.0092425095,0.0028651839,0.008306147,0.006679101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03995352,0.00082256115,0.0015578326,0.0014762417,0.035208154,0.01806297,0.013200125,0.014376106,0.00089071796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024529202,0.0000032345772,0.0000495863,0.000007208406,0.0000024576593,0.000012983288,0.00014008064,0.00019480719,0.000025903099,0.9984322,0.00024568278,0.0008833533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005207529,0.000003849265,0.000032838943,0.000020218566,0.0000035606263,0.000024434736,0.00007855186,0.0014302138,0.000051316678,0.9956286,0.0027168277,0.0000044207945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014501335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013600775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03655142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052795983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055303476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19330466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595573420","doi":"10.1017/asb.2018.30","title":"ON THE OPTIMALITY OF A STRAIGHT DEDUCTIBLE UNDER BELIEF HETEROGENEITY","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Astin Bulletin","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province; University of Toronto; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Deductible; Ceteris paribus; Economics; Actuarial science; Moral hazard; Risk aversion (psychology); Insurance policy; Arrow; Mathematical economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Microeconomics; Incentive; Computer science","score_opus":0.04438897647763835,"score_gpt":0.2295163087316337,"score_spread":0.18512733225399536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595573420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76216173,0.0008850615,0.19867207,0.0031139634,0.000069690264,0.00012488718,0.0003485489,0.00016297652,0.03446106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99285203,0.00010198416,0.0061677713,0.00007248068,0.00002285618,0.000013571173,0.000029409668,0.000009377904,0.0007304647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729484,0.0009787399,0.00017834398,0.00040958662,0.0006765512,0.00046190055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98230916,0.013925915,0.0013045147,0.0011812123,0.00067223446,0.00060693343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055307094,0.00032499558,0.00080756174,0.00070246856,0.0006207272,0.0019628082,0.00097311207,0.0017605391,0.0031030655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022905108,0.00044579702,0.00060226774,0.0003788708,0.002249439,0.0026975423,0.00168435,0.00205829,0.0002573301],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048335988,0.00025259875,0.0032920246,0.00018583945,0.00008966978,0.00034081258,0.00048125276,0.0994107,0.005519906,0.86231154,0.0011654745,0.026466899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009443191,0.00028702794,0.0029479945,0.00007235376,0.000038981034,0.00014765162,0.0001858029,0.19996923,0.0023229206,0.79257244,0.0013249053,0.000036285703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012973092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005588945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055307094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001966538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011783077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029249549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595964638","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2934489","title":"The Voting Rights of Ex-Felons and Election Outcomes in the United States","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Political science; Spoilt vote; Group voting ticket; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.017132457258594337,"score_gpt":0.2307899925906917,"score_spread":0.21365753533209736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595964638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913215,0.00026421144,0.0001556824,0.0019565725,0.000026088797,0.000008053373,0.00048042453,0.000007752642,0.005779677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863017,0.00006504868,0.00001076652,0.00009541015,0.000016494398,0.0000028602535,0.00020895852,0.0000018722633,0.000968325],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985108,0.00041433278,0.00009938971,0.00013318598,0.00011651793,0.0007257239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813938,0.008215169,0.005352732,0.00068481354,0.001101601,0.0032518762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034522356,0.00014319555,0.00052753696,0.0011772716,0.0015732837,0.0031869914,0.0007657782,0.0014893777,0.00919458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015772965,0.00022335972,0.00037938365,0.0010516915,0.0011222301,0.0016639964,0.0015936217,0.0024459208,0.00086147914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012605386,0.0006167712,0.94367456,0.00004376273,0.00019762755,0.00039676012,0.0022438571,0.002724784,0.00023698126,0.021886427,0.009480241,0.017237613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001098087,0.000235092,0.9623136,0.0000715252,0.00015504986,0.00021156414,0.005654139,0.006198967,0.00045854927,0.019807609,0.0047256523,0.000058394206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028677264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04740002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028677264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008889075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071967155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057020664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597966259","doi":"","title":"La Class Action: profili di diritto comparato","year":2007,"lang":"it","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Philosophy; Physics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13023570272910956,"score_gpt":0.30634453558623087,"score_spread":0.1761088328571213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597966259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15820569,0.0029201407,0.013503153,0.018089883,0.0009909894,0.00020149154,0.0008151323,0.00021722591,0.80505633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92163545,0.0011855041,0.0033478406,0.0019967146,0.000601043,0.00013905171,0.00058209157,0.000273257,0.070238985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888996,0.0034986096,0.00045725284,0.0019123452,0.0039576218,0.0012745283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98481256,0.004475658,0.002676227,0.0021954926,0.0035384258,0.002301629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075386204,0.00040268133,0.00053387677,0.0026176213,0.0042476333,0.01247013,0.0011774667,0.0015913055,0.042360343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028476905,0.00027099877,0.0004858025,0.0021936952,0.005963694,0.008229713,0.004274956,0.0030219678,0.0041715913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003574386,0.00021222996,0.069989696,0.00023928084,0.00009248282,0.00043832627,0.055603262,0.00030049714,0.0008203771,0.6642582,0.032255378,0.17543289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059153914,0.00036131934,0.14369538,0.0005981032,0.00008350755,0.00049536006,0.028216336,0.0011187111,0.0010357463,0.21481322,0.6093943,0.00012885174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012770977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010031773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042360343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038610538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038453175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14170945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598304646","doi":"10.4337/9781782540519.00016","title":"Legal traditions and economic performance: theory and evidence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing Limited eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positive economics; Economics; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039936134370395567,"score_gpt":0.20239214304152187,"score_spread":0.1624560086711263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598304646","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3491621,0.38087806,0.006795197,0.06607069,0.0010317912,0.0004341725,0.006561636,0.00011420701,0.1889521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8815284,0.106069155,0.0017881053,0.004024016,0.001493127,0.00015957147,0.0021025415,0.00004604076,0.002789128],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925419,0.0034503392,0.0004111443,0.0011098806,0.0018647653,0.0006219944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7293596,0.22523741,0.026489753,0.004325427,0.012009823,0.0025779752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013607753,0.0011009827,0.0016241341,0.010195716,0.0018591743,0.0072509916,0.003309546,0.0030624673,0.031874552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07916617,0.0006831973,0.00093065336,0.018255828,0.010107744,0.007730145,0.0043663066,0.0035092218,0.0028860155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001027001,0.0020608378,0.5098571,0.007089663,0.0026534752,0.0008564216,0.0042578904,0.003999232,0.000056746077,0.2944085,0.041327614,0.1324055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057810533,0.0008411487,0.5676315,0.02465689,0.0019087923,0.0005213254,0.020236123,0.008098754,0.0004077828,0.27640042,0.09850714,0.00021198751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0125803165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076016565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031874552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003927443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036342905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10663104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602224305","doi":"","title":"Judgment and Opportunity: Decision Assignment on the McLachlin Court","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Humanities; Redaction; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.08282033351291515,"score_gpt":0.24322079937221452,"score_spread":0.16040046585929937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602224305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6406081,0.00053614384,0.008131294,0.0074286456,0.00012028021,0.0003448719,0.00020194941,0.0000688726,0.34255987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98498625,0.0000845233,0.001797623,0.0002293234,0.000042685115,0.000037345017,0.000034990375,0.000015670155,0.012771624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861568,0.0031117105,0.00032623386,0.0012324002,0.0053822715,0.0037905595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904721,0.0037713381,0.00076075055,0.00037789924,0.0017738895,0.002844027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005105008,0.00029698483,0.00041593087,0.0024271656,0.011045209,0.0111366855,0.0011679971,0.0013585589,0.012472179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022717588,0.00036099076,0.00032778704,0.0021554509,0.006833233,0.0029965565,0.0068284585,0.0022305534,0.0007198797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006898423,0.00027214704,0.06467454,0.00008145023,0.000042634216,0.0021529815,0.02908917,0.0062070913,0.0023941656,0.6507679,0.018974472,0.22465354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023194848,0.0005903528,0.3035273,0.00032792342,0.00011694945,0.00064883596,0.061772503,0.034406845,0.003179207,0.4348212,0.16002744,0.00034951273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30797085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53171706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96933633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030663667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025041068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61235654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606278834","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4856","title":"BUSINESS DOMINANCE IN THE “PEOPLE’S COURT”: AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY IN THE TORONTO SMALL CLAIMS COURT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Plaintiff; Dominance (genetics); Humanities; Political science; Management; Law; Economics; Art","score_opus":0.08276705721119029,"score_gpt":0.32905351928698584,"score_spread":0.24628646207579555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606278834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98875684,0.00020002999,0.00014391566,0.00036920895,0.000006498846,0.000019252506,0.00010645987,0.0000025711904,0.010395189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975012,0.00016958971,0.00006581018,0.000049472786,0.0000075087046,0.000011630951,0.00011251758,0.000003419451,0.0020787832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993105,0.0013105852,0.00044027486,0.0005176144,0.003425506,0.0012009883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97428775,0.0064162794,0.008444149,0.0006859629,0.0046199504,0.0055458597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027614068,0.00021990683,0.0004433947,0.0042798705,0.0083661955,0.004939832,0.0010081505,0.0007919129,0.00513907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017506376,0.00036738883,0.00024192747,0.005271861,0.006224816,0.0025052347,0.004787223,0.0012744592,0.00038459187],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015905313,0.00009867652,0.7411028,0.000106722444,0.00008694199,0.0024554906,0.22366066,0.00038569717,0.001143479,0.005834973,0.0030172134,0.021948261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005268823,0.00005844597,0.8284049,0.0000746419,0.000021198211,0.00031216358,0.1616648,0.00051110936,0.0002893814,0.0004547115,0.00816293,0.000040434334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6623525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83068305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3376475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021793185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010605196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67927194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608245704","doi":"10.1257/mic.20140272","title":"Disclosure and Legal Advice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Advice (programming); Perspective (graphical); Legal advice; Outcome (game theory); Business; Law and economics; Private information retrieval; Law; Political science; Public relations; Economics; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.013305828060280089,"score_gpt":0.22469163552092916,"score_spread":0.21138580746064908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608245704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5257573,0.015656445,0.035272572,0.1193112,0.00038147887,0.00020774912,0.00051129365,0.0001619837,0.30273995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865428,0.0017246013,0.0023317747,0.0028277107,0.00022453445,0.000021404405,0.00004110604,0.000014115912,0.0062718606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887179,0.0056731496,0.0006775695,0.000960745,0.0028922108,0.0010784082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8879933,0.07620665,0.02228272,0.005355312,0.005949538,0.002212465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009246243,0.00025762836,0.00052662916,0.001156604,0.0015042644,0.0038620483,0.0007269983,0.0048728595,0.012543857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11417377,0.00026512993,0.0002467165,0.0012398486,0.003661695,0.0031442808,0.0019803613,0.002785079,0.00087128597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004448477,0.00052886433,0.069429345,0.0005356391,0.00016325993,0.0013370868,0.010297717,0.0074357437,0.0017764535,0.6347417,0.013833839,0.2594755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024313017,0.00031916003,0.052582484,0.0005810818,0.0001522798,0.0014271522,0.0035036276,0.009548029,0.0012841681,0.8279026,0.10233935,0.00011693871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038761254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035316297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012543857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029409246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002814447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048899412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613024834","doi":"","title":"2011 - 2nd Annual Innis Christie Symposium on Labour and Employment Law - Why the Right-Freedom Distinction Matters to Labour Lawyers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labour law; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.013233486406420199,"score_gpt":0.2100311303280441,"score_spread":0.1967976439216239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613024834","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026114895,0.052922733,0.00037894805,0.63804406,0.021206403,0.00005055875,0.00049977086,0.00003924301,0.28424677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03442505,0.032087673,0.0008513571,0.049749576,0.010216558,0.00008925205,0.00042143025,0.00008418659,0.872075],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984256,0.00034279414,0.000059421513,0.0002274269,0.0005023825,0.00044245934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727815,0.0009298565,0.00014276087,0.00013664259,0.00074890064,0.0007637216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033066878,0.00049817556,0.0005411511,0.001268031,0.007205772,0.009877305,0.0011782955,0.012022368,0.04795864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061172526,0.0005497042,0.00051178277,0.0010493447,0.0040929997,0.004329471,0.0032935007,0.008755282,0.009161032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009811201,0.000022012031,0.00026719418,0.000046884405,0.0000035217467,0.00006123954,0.00043439647,0.0000481896,0.000046112167,0.026977211,0.96368974,0.008393754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033889403,0.0000036532224,0.001321297,0.0004293081,0.0000036042825,0.000024401907,0.0008212593,0.00004378738,0.000035750418,0.004952832,0.9923489,0.000011933188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.074900724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3227978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074900724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014888008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01807311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16043764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614258111","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2924665","title":"Playing by the Rules? Agreement between Predicted and Observed Binary Choices","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Agreement; Binary number; Psychology; Mathematics; Linguistics; Philosophy; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.028288858079060814,"score_gpt":0.20881798861530868,"score_spread":0.18052913053624786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614258111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9056295,0.00059335725,0.036896266,0.015815604,0.00027762807,0.00012033574,0.00082911865,0.00010897057,0.0397292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99734455,0.00007622964,0.0013417465,0.00041029864,0.000050461367,0.00002086747,0.000102150996,0.000014769955,0.0006389164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.97984374,0.011599152,0.0010316534,0.003556568,0.0019821736,0.0019866724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7579729,0.19983375,0.017229669,0.015910413,0.006129634,0.0029235862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043041866,0.0003729225,0.001615349,0.0009987578,0.0012331288,0.008776523,0.002222401,0.005116709,0.008980602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2204713,0.0006486949,0.00086245453,0.0008522828,0.0042443993,0.0055615534,0.0017090832,0.005953667,0.0013037148],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0053143483,0.0010192782,0.23111412,0.00040668022,0.0016130983,0.00080442603,0.00815848,0.04086346,0.0036332463,0.6049455,0.011107725,0.09101965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049182633,0.00025262978,0.102292426,0.00013028746,0.00023511016,0.00020295734,0.0023146349,0.1182927,0.0016896722,0.77080667,0.0031223604,0.00016871757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005300555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040008673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043041866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016362789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017403216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2276299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614933388","doi":"10.1515/rle-2016-0054","title":"The Selection of Litigation against Government Agencies: Evidence from China","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Law & Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Selection (genetic algorithm); Settlement (finance); China; Government (linguistics); Test (biology); Civil litigation; Relevance (law); Identification (biology); Law; Process (computing); Political science; Business; Economics; Law and economics; Finance; Computer science; Payment","score_opus":0.04661389579998683,"score_gpt":0.2498799181973859,"score_spread":0.20326602239739905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614933388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974298,0.00027462124,0.00015583365,0.00023980638,0.0000053825433,0.000021609925,0.0002456082,0.0000035704338,0.0016238334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991609,0.00013651686,0.000039826846,0.000052199197,0.000011152986,0.000008246621,0.00023921371,0.0000013696256,0.00035057537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935389,0.0014831091,0.00061212276,0.0011154023,0.0022218628,0.0010285735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95903736,0.010189659,0.020834653,0.0024985566,0.0052610226,0.0021786252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063181114,0.00029869168,0.00066799467,0.004337136,0.0019425276,0.001592829,0.0012168492,0.00060153514,0.0034495725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016389336,0.00027309242,0.00071288884,0.0059501072,0.0019670124,0.0008567921,0.0015890041,0.0007304024,0.00032115963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069189315,0.0000868138,0.98546475,0.000058217756,0.00019046298,0.00048109327,0.0019097909,0.00040011163,0.00016455569,0.001498003,0.0009402105,0.008736771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014544587,0.000047136782,0.99692327,0.000015741783,0.000068238674,0.00008086421,0.0007724359,0.00085633877,0.00012894561,0.00021765666,0.0008631242,0.000011512982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1438591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17602223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1438591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003545014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034720928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28604347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620508378","doi":"10.1111/jpet.12473","title":"Private Protection and Public Policing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Complementarity (molecular biology); Business; Public economics; Computer security; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04572237068711072,"score_gpt":0.22468182246362403,"score_spread":0.17895945177651332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620508378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5445336,0.0062668105,0.047365285,0.087855704,0.0005796374,0.00008804251,0.00075925485,0.00009190095,0.31245983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936241,0.0007529442,0.0003772387,0.0002631615,0.0002087805,0.000007120297,0.000022983877,0.000005955316,0.004737666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864215,0.0005209531,0.00004927468,0.0001554495,0.00018053586,0.0004515745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98735225,0.008827419,0.0019009914,0.00067336217,0.0007927671,0.00045326632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023269642,0.00021597311,0.0006544858,0.0011128772,0.001312862,0.0047298726,0.00049088127,0.0028108493,0.012802411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014205555,0.0002496799,0.0003576872,0.0011859355,0.004198755,0.0036210353,0.0011363757,0.002204689,0.00052147324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006234963,0.00009089988,0.0038521725,0.000041629144,0.000022379883,0.000075627766,0.00029149553,0.0063997665,0.000085050364,0.9761086,0.0054664123,0.0075037293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003147052,0.000017211461,0.003551695,0.000044705554,0.000022421662,0.000033566135,0.0005820603,0.00993499,0.000105853615,0.9807757,0.004891367,0.00000907773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078060585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059815375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012802411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003150509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034788672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04282838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620602028","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n3p151","title":"Civil Liability of Employers against Workers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Legal liability; Strict liability; Doctrine; Law; Legal doctrine; Actuarial science; Mens rea; Fault (geology); Law and economics; Business; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Economics; Public law; Criminal law","score_opus":0.032019254149304864,"score_gpt":0.24131313759261883,"score_spread":0.20929388344331395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620602028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84340614,0.002185754,0.0032298418,0.0046598897,0.00006952001,0.00012665299,0.00013418158,0.000009251856,0.1461788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925856,0.00046917613,0.00032212745,0.0003719841,0.000038371873,0.000031115767,0.00003383194,0.0000014640152,0.0061464095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99460876,0.0017184746,0.0002434546,0.0004570184,0.002030458,0.0009418206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98959523,0.005565984,0.002755734,0.0005247193,0.001093828,0.00046447275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026938696,0.00013046627,0.00018384293,0.0016238558,0.002640721,0.0023060257,0.0004172593,0.00094653125,0.005795313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014061638,0.00013269453,0.00022480785,0.0010708944,0.002755031,0.0018815008,0.0021604327,0.0010728289,0.00060179434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100053294,0.0003474365,0.2938503,0.0001991261,0.000026811538,0.001779678,0.035736784,0.0013864655,0.0007524478,0.57963383,0.0073226537,0.07886451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030822783,0.00054670294,0.43692988,0.0013500955,0.000093112714,0.003474381,0.09881737,0.004591811,0.003175987,0.3182266,0.13266544,0.00009779966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039831684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005795313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017658091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031794566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019387186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624349364","doi":"10.1093/restud/rdw024","title":"A Theory of Contracts with Limited Enforcement","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"The Review of Economic Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Business; Payment; Quality (philosophy); Private information retrieval; Contract management; Information asymmetry; Microeconomics; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Computer security; Law; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.07297848367771155,"score_gpt":0.27616966326561104,"score_spread":0.2031911795878995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624349364","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019917395,0.003253869,0.7137265,0.012588791,0.00032075556,0.0002778567,0.0008117603,0.00031783324,0.24878518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7018919,0.0062107653,0.17654617,0.003442514,0.001565014,0.0012902134,0.0007869523,0.00026835405,0.10799799],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937594,0.0021712538,0.00039514896,0.0010064687,0.0020077408,0.0006599153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862527,0.008299142,0.0014740168,0.001855655,0.0015616185,0.0005569474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005450464,0.0011069312,0.0013761977,0.002255611,0.0036663988,0.0071873236,0.003391838,0.0070144585,0.024208616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014384587,0.0010749645,0.0023560252,0.0032649718,0.009519248,0.014492434,0.0032029701,0.006791669,0.0031222473],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025318184,0.000005613694,0.00003534978,0.000010678227,0.0000023315663,0.000022029117,0.000039865845,0.0013757588,0.000026114907,0.9970452,0.00044153293,0.0009930425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014672112,0.00000877453,0.000041557567,0.00002844548,0.000003786879,0.000055465203,0.000028613325,0.013325932,0.00003545175,0.9785362,0.007914132,0.000007168731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00473893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021201195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024208616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070720576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004894982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080985844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626498955","doi":"10.71781/23753","title":"L’étude de l’influence des facteurs légaux et extralégaux dans le cheminement des affaires de fraude au Québec","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.034925052850572215,"score_gpt":0.2700100798840599,"score_spread":0.2350850270334877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626498955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854667,0.0008553977,0.00047803824,0.002213992,0.000032317737,0.00003539268,0.0004947212,0.000005966549,0.01041754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933555,0.000556889,0.00024412348,0.00021153154,0.0000124565495,0.000018348697,0.00019820713,0.000006876838,0.0053961948],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971296,0.0008299619,0.00008891976,0.00029084433,0.00091140356,0.0007492956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874944,0.0031455688,0.0025632628,0.0005285653,0.0044505266,0.0018175248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032283359,0.00029085772,0.0005270168,0.001733226,0.004729875,0.0032016311,0.0009840028,0.000550156,0.00625401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01032367,0.00034248602,0.00049710163,0.0027575216,0.0021189172,0.0008977931,0.0014152756,0.0014325816,0.0003038922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012663745,0.00008545713,0.95056,0.000086981796,0.00017615639,0.00023613728,0.018101372,0.00052308367,0.00028933826,0.0030812342,0.002106082,0.024627483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030528806,0.000024810526,0.98498845,0.00011251772,0.000049901544,0.000028459302,0.00923756,0.0004998881,0.00010225578,0.00016541511,0.0047702454,0.00001742638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97699434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9907991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030234085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030234085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03688237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21936464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W267942095","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.757505","title":"Regulatory Adverse Selection in the Life Insurance Market","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse selection; Business; Selection (genetic algorithm); Actuarial science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.010684531124718464,"score_gpt":0.1909071636966086,"score_spread":0.18022263257189014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W267942095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6351433,0.0042150337,0.10105521,0.057269327,0.00062661665,0.00023015594,0.0003208935,0.0003909663,0.2007485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920902,0.00055037136,0.0008023811,0.0009927672,0.00045908266,0.00002576123,0.000019374771,0.000011842036,0.0050481735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946571,0.0027560897,0.00017544428,0.00050830236,0.00075862143,0.0011443754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.974069,0.017496584,0.004027057,0.0009936658,0.0019395213,0.0014741864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012439679,0.00038855994,0.0013339454,0.0014614766,0.0018378602,0.0064946627,0.0012636501,0.007625532,0.0086297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032665085,0.0005629658,0.0011101892,0.0008518233,0.0056334855,0.0046571963,0.0015325485,0.0049118665,0.00075060216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016523176,0.00012310217,0.003296189,0.000045356523,0.000041816118,0.00046120875,0.00024165459,0.014282909,0.0005944779,0.9687167,0.005081744,0.0069495817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014605936,0.00008079653,0.0031083308,0.000023440118,0.00004288661,0.00013602407,0.00015992817,0.03846085,0.0002576699,0.95528185,0.002260106,0.000042138774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005538176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049699666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012439679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002961398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039403243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06578809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735981252","doi":"","title":"Working Together and Working Things Out: Dispute Resolution in Repeated Vertical Exchange Relationships","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Negotiation; Arbitration; Compensation (psychology); Social exchange theory; Dispute resolution; Work (physics); Preference; Business; Social psychology; Conflict resolution; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Law; Microeconomics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04013743926944903,"score_gpt":0.22152169196730284,"score_spread":0.1813842526978538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735981252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97956353,0.00047644592,0.0056129945,0.00078798865,0.000011339679,0.000030110657,0.000014039058,0.000007618657,0.0134958895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988379,0.000077633995,0.0004103769,0.000038213282,0.0000092179325,0.0000069213033,0.000010107037,0.0000016908957,0.0006080797],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98630255,0.008377145,0.0008792151,0.0009638081,0.0021470126,0.0013302022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8929764,0.06785726,0.028041344,0.0051621604,0.0024983785,0.0034644331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010135453,0.00019076387,0.00040259672,0.0011422515,0.0026307907,0.0053531155,0.0010414817,0.00195778,0.0087073045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087184764,0.00036899679,0.00030653345,0.0010616032,0.0035455548,0.0059565497,0.0037643781,0.0021935166,0.0006625108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012025026,0.0011717166,0.52092564,0.00047792878,0.0003831378,0.005494399,0.12505451,0.006272587,0.008272136,0.12588568,0.001003167,0.20385663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000333169,0.0018866616,0.45573375,0.00052256923,0.00034856357,0.010387721,0.16252916,0.028435102,0.0065018856,0.3038704,0.02913811,0.00031291408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020278166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019447496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010135453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010448288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082110683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05360204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736885686","doi":"","title":"Survol de cinq décisions d’intérêt en matière de franchisage au Québec en 2013","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"INT; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.011883503984936745,"score_gpt":0.20966708196313497,"score_spread":0.19778357797819823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736885686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.926639,0.0052231443,0.0017149452,0.008134025,0.00020007975,0.00010487063,0.016246557,0.00011739781,0.041619997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85066307,0.002716034,0.0010017778,0.0010078042,0.00008042478,0.00006062022,0.0056998883,0.000043223856,0.13872711],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982438,0.00021970965,0.00008391332,0.00019633642,0.0007012421,0.0005549404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99400324,0.001139285,0.0008134819,0.000119430384,0.0028617706,0.0010628286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001663766,0.00043229037,0.00039007937,0.0019094923,0.003072456,0.003266465,0.00066061586,0.0011743746,0.0077897194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005743895,0.00034596983,0.00041999028,0.0028472359,0.00096479943,0.0008112001,0.0008101754,0.0018532242,0.0011019266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008597202,0.00025250553,0.68154174,0.00023141241,0.0002566182,0.002159822,0.013110286,0.0065489733,0.0014332784,0.013459244,0.117768444,0.16237803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031511772,0.00006722147,0.8613597,0.0001632428,0.000042180283,0.000148283,0.007522343,0.002672251,0.00073363807,0.00036525566,0.1268151,0.00007921213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9850885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99355066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039560534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039560534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021683628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28703308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738960349","doi":"","title":"Design and Conduct of the Cost of Justice: Survey","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.12041657321479307,"score_gpt":0.25112858050289344,"score_spread":0.13071200728810037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738960349","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18382885,0.00052860065,0.024590796,0.002750486,0.0003589115,0.7141012,0.047732398,0.00041941262,0.025689369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.114272535,0.0008770471,0.07214655,0.0030246456,0.0002645198,0.78933805,0.011507372,0.00013822589,0.00843105],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768439,0.0111033395,0.002190049,0.001741247,0.005458015,0.0026634538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97679454,0.004493055,0.0024179444,0.0018813405,0.011525048,0.0028880208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02584905,0.0011145847,0.0013720975,0.0052050375,0.0035110062,0.0030654215,0.0029891164,0.00228515,0.017493831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025574137,0.0027099033,0.0007043603,0.0066250195,0.0019754355,0.001466001,0.0026102134,0.0029975122,0.0059823403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0050081313,0.018708885,0.25453123,0.0039957976,0.00022591981,0.0012702883,0.035231397,0.014239723,0.005095062,0.023168344,0.26515824,0.37336707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022772187,0.007397067,0.61300457,0.0016946828,0.00015754573,0.0003801546,0.02534424,0.015127067,0.0033290419,0.0075305407,0.32310933,0.00064854685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30824015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36276206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30824015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020529207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051747635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.612892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739667836","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v3i1.335","title":"Estimating Damages from Price-Fixing","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Wright; Estimation; Product (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Management; Law; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04566000727133477,"score_gpt":0.2406326891469367,"score_spread":0.19497268187560193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739667836","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10026213,0.01221768,0.8040196,0.0041449983,0.00038509877,0.00048090226,0.0010990475,0.00039120016,0.076999396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8828872,0.01155587,0.0957103,0.00046722274,0.00035814362,0.0002180992,0.0012082017,0.00011416127,0.007480816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885289,0.0032053709,0.0006575761,0.00097361195,0.0061681727,0.00046634022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95258874,0.033382073,0.007380868,0.0028808664,0.003554519,0.00021279391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013395943,0.00096857786,0.001408291,0.008523613,0.00089056016,0.003515064,0.0026030703,0.0024582283,0.004676841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07923572,0.00076011126,0.0013359002,0.0053253463,0.0052813613,0.0057757925,0.0026511676,0.0027363615,0.0006645065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005859747,0.00006247199,0.028875444,0.00066951086,0.00025935035,0.00059303833,0.00051295647,0.24143502,0.0005630931,0.5192519,0.007925259,0.19979338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021448137,0.0001486034,0.036997106,0.0007695277,0.00014616341,0.00094367634,0.0004947708,0.19679701,0.0022964007,0.73329526,0.02790259,0.00018747683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011465473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009423007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013395943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047810813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018451192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070845425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744632005","doi":"","title":"Optimal Auditing for Insurance Fraud","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cahiers de recherche","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Insurance fraud; Deterrence theory; Business; Actuarial science; Accounting; Computer science","score_opus":0.1869632204713474,"score_gpt":0.2897695046686149,"score_spread":0.1028062841972675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744632005","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24066004,0.0064488086,0.6542965,0.017981624,0.0008488427,0.00072067836,0.0008143988,0.0011430186,0.07708606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624398,0.0011292065,0.029707234,0.00019477928,0.00020538701,0.000071269074,0.00010926836,0.00004847524,0.0060945293],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963812,0.0019234441,0.00021793743,0.00041511995,0.0005355754,0.000526686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98929197,0.0067998446,0.0012211131,0.00095530436,0.0011251459,0.00060664554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006170287,0.0006695964,0.0019107225,0.0011938694,0.00080076203,0.003077174,0.00090111356,0.0020551113,0.008185239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03603755,0.00089098583,0.00053641724,0.0010248403,0.0015524619,0.0034994471,0.0020835747,0.002434308,0.0006151232],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014435521,0.00040257626,0.0034297819,0.0004886998,0.00014218735,0.00021357137,0.00026326708,0.41726816,0.0014646399,0.3840172,0.027238335,0.16362809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022044608,0.00013158002,0.0013658002,0.00009654265,0.000056246005,0.0000692577,0.000088196895,0.58349496,0.0006240554,0.41101357,0.002815726,0.000023624973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043032803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038973964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008185239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003272656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005292207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032631993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745362841","doi":"","title":"Recent Developments: Barrie School v. Patch: There Is No Duty for a Non-Breaching Party to Mitigate Damages When the Contract Contains a Valid Liquidated Damages Clause","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Baltimore Law Forum","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Duty; Restitution; Forensic engineering; Law; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.030056727268693007,"score_gpt":0.21377852029395641,"score_spread":0.1837217930252634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2745362841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07685987,0.01593908,0.004657546,0.32421765,0.0038878606,0.0002696626,0.0018102919,0.0003711983,0.57198673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50896996,0.007909251,0.002797996,0.284284,0.0058715697,0.00022744821,0.0011039588,0.00020045014,0.18863545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926272,0.00076108845,0.00033263225,0.0023970886,0.0025384838,0.001343413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98974776,0.0059629935,0.0008637809,0.0006796674,0.0019873716,0.0007584907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006586314,0.0005275068,0.0006498119,0.0018499371,0.0055975188,0.0077971746,0.004577635,0.01629919,0.018199505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019000962,0.0011328992,0.0010697009,0.001460986,0.0070212735,0.00471171,0.0029742196,0.017730966,0.002787965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016942348,0.000094398594,0.0042200685,0.00031509384,0.000074853546,0.00096257374,0.0024588178,0.00044111384,0.001277009,0.5530368,0.40420973,0.032740086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002354561,0.00017115231,0.03044094,0.000508472,0.0002597837,0.0009881726,0.0012633232,0.00065641553,0.002066857,0.050571416,0.91264623,0.0001916115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1438467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15759166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1438467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007602793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008560172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28601885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750762952","doi":"","title":"Mitigation, Apology and the Quantification of Non-Pecuniary Damages","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Business; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.015362429352062784,"score_gpt":0.22970012800820402,"score_spread":0.21433769865614125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750762952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16140988,0.026519023,0.10965839,0.041135807,0.0016957512,0.00022212052,0.00014870784,0.00018344799,0.65902686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95542884,0.0044267983,0.006831782,0.0015755375,0.0004161246,0.00009793553,0.000027664533,0.000041705687,0.031153569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943709,0.0024735988,0.00026164044,0.0006274393,0.00165445,0.000612049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99344784,0.0025166078,0.001805626,0.00080505456,0.0011164324,0.0003084146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050646765,0.0005851383,0.0004508686,0.0017193698,0.0022026468,0.0066799643,0.0014318915,0.003156682,0.007457262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014343865,0.00033750822,0.0006333143,0.0007811892,0.01632362,0.0077469624,0.004371542,0.0038801946,0.00054322137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018286999,0.000035469046,0.0008362943,0.00007783973,0.000018192914,0.00012581586,0.0010094425,0.0017400209,0.00037225962,0.97918814,0.0017906076,0.014787512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015267056,0.0000948611,0.004213195,0.00031340562,0.00003412799,0.000256554,0.001712263,0.00245443,0.00057310733,0.94619787,0.044088468,0.000046430214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002602767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002879127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007457262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047282837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036426191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034306288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754731433","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3028318","title":"The Signal-Tuning Function of Liability Regimes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"SIGNAL (programming language); Liability; Function (biology); Business; Control theory (sociology); Computer science; Finance; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Cell biology","score_opus":0.01952750520634121,"score_gpt":0.21405353583668052,"score_spread":0.1945260306303393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754731433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7144114,0.0008903435,0.2492732,0.004003164,0.00007226616,0.000050527717,0.00049707585,0.0008947792,0.029907176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994242,0.00017299714,0.002694163,0.000077788005,0.0000438666,0.000010337626,0.00005299559,0.00003771957,0.0026681374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875414,0.00055689295,0.00004683186,0.000294312,0.00016633529,0.00018150877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97041523,0.022642884,0.0030447557,0.0020060884,0.0010608545,0.00083024974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038268566,0.0003953586,0.0009496151,0.0014628829,0.0005858079,0.0026603409,0.0012891889,0.0027939873,0.0073350663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05107801,0.0007276651,0.0004726332,0.0008933575,0.0020514082,0.004136503,0.0011020536,0.0019576997,0.00068768696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032811234,0.00016342325,0.012050265,0.00022118272,0.00012951845,0.0004521932,0.0005998104,0.13636014,0.011121772,0.78467983,0.004516594,0.04937725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049866398,0.000091703296,0.018698217,0.000056446515,0.00004762562,0.000449481,0.0001422245,0.57171685,0.0013683066,0.40634948,0.0009544328,0.00007536225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012963272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007557948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073350663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010413646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052404014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024538219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759650691","doi":"","title":"A manual of costs in the Supreme Court of Canada, High Court of Justice, Court of Appeal, county courts, etc. : with forms of bills [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books  | UK Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Supreme court; Political science; Court of record; Remand (court procedure); Court of equity; Law of the case; Original jurisdiction; High Court; Majority opinion; Certiorari; Concurring opinion; Economic Justice; Precedent","score_opus":0.013725958860663771,"score_gpt":0.20325320514819745,"score_spread":0.18952724628753367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759650691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001874366,0.017805342,0.015641771,0.017589405,0.004298969,0.00051190297,0.068609916,0.0034012839,0.8702671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022502324,0.012121907,0.03208538,0.0067205443,0.0011526941,0.00046958163,0.027241323,0.0025359972,0.89517033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972398,0.00020460936,0.00019060961,0.00017455078,0.001964648,0.00022585104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99492776,0.0010733634,0.0001774215,0.00031395297,0.0033405703,0.00016682285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014270175,0.0013227673,0.0009367973,0.008555632,0.005110484,0.005724221,0.0018265932,0.002148343,0.18624456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007895106,0.00122684,0.0009957982,0.012739639,0.0017146562,0.0053123767,0.0011141878,0.0034671086,0.06153063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006236926,0.000008611548,0.00016065911,0.00007596647,0.0000026642804,0.000021570371,0.00018748343,0.00012569684,0.00006865911,0.035003725,0.93418,0.03015868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003826886,0.0000058186447,0.0022679488,0.00014625692,0.0000048881216,0.00011222123,0.00026280337,0.00016050132,0.000103869854,0.011308489,0.9855957,0.00002762309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4944065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.711526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50559354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013583657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022274038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98305744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763225059","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3042990","title":"Renegotiation of Long-Term Contracts with Implicit Incentives","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Term (time); Incentive; Business; Implicit contract theory; Economics; Microeconomics; Labour economics; Labor relations","score_opus":0.01484070829372474,"score_gpt":0.22385020054733168,"score_spread":0.20900949225360693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763225059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.638008,0.0008670611,0.29877582,0.0029294323,0.0002594535,0.0003876578,0.0004276929,0.0006139874,0.057730906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765806,0.00015341774,0.013471644,0.00017611757,0.000074834905,0.00012490868,0.000080448066,0.000056700243,0.009281222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844987,0.008364902,0.0011048212,0.0020498538,0.0018851586,0.0020965822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8949177,0.06501304,0.011414907,0.022176955,0.0035236536,0.0029537096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020344326,0.00074742624,0.0020467024,0.00084103114,0.0020369804,0.0065076286,0.0039599747,0.0066845315,0.01398642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07798777,0.001037382,0.0013776801,0.0012729475,0.00393275,0.010465243,0.0041624676,0.005815073,0.0015906185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013030337,0.00060475804,0.0054775598,0.00027587338,0.0001464105,0.00084655086,0.0014627771,0.02739305,0.0053011933,0.91611844,0.0025424685,0.03852769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037935437,0.00036137304,0.0019172071,0.00007989308,0.000116332674,0.00046350504,0.00040611374,0.14229167,0.0032555675,0.8439503,0.0066955215,0.00008323823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010080505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015293239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020344326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019191935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033417076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107592404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763806419","doi":"10.7202/1022345ar","title":"The Criminal Law and the Civil Code in Day-to-Day Employee Relations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Law; Industrial relations; Code (set theory); Section (typography); Political science; Labour law; Criminal law; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Advertising","score_opus":0.034604634100283325,"score_gpt":0.22022252975925902,"score_spread":0.18561789565897568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763806419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10063724,0.053134218,0.0041429857,0.35949165,0.0024042998,0.00005591598,0.00015687829,0.000036071717,0.47994074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9164851,0.0073198834,0.0007490036,0.021710236,0.0022445363,0.000045854955,0.000044883593,0.000034868277,0.05136582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921584,0.0039372207,0.00014576648,0.00045294603,0.0012282621,0.0020774705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98870814,0.0077232057,0.001128118,0.00037047954,0.0009617021,0.0011084853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004180384,0.00020804787,0.00025954994,0.0016501625,0.00947938,0.010210446,0.0008026666,0.007981495,0.009537875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015998386,0.00032818384,0.00021817381,0.0024486773,0.02705415,0.0059282104,0.0022057395,0.005196943,0.0007067032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018366703,0.000019890642,0.0016822856,0.000025856825,0.0000028704637,0.00024385017,0.0048822165,0.0001827392,0.000060281167,0.93855786,0.042750478,0.011573283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030087,0.000046143894,0.031242011,0.00087328587,0.000008123533,0.00040106324,0.022528967,0.0009246985,0.00023516703,0.5104884,0.4331185,0.00010354551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072127506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11818021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072127506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011123119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008142415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14341539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765492662","doi":"10.51359/2448-2307.2017.22982","title":"Why Individual Freedom and the Autonomy of Law Stand or Fall Together","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Acadêmica da Faculdade de Direito do Recife","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Autonomy; Philosophy of law; Economic Justice; Private law; Sociology; Comparative law; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.058094641587998846,"score_gpt":0.2668254521218085,"score_spread":0.20873081053380968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765492662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1418233,0.0154864015,0.059546493,0.3324748,0.0015627508,0.00011325529,0.0002884679,0.00025836958,0.44844612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97903454,0.0015850014,0.0029220805,0.00783279,0.00065682543,0.00005566582,0.00005595323,0.00009376803,0.0077633313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899442,0.003258514,0.00029723666,0.0021887855,0.0023854896,0.001925821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813804,0.009572795,0.0019996047,0.002886154,0.001827492,0.0023335367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0111579,0.00041508503,0.0011351439,0.0016706914,0.0049360646,0.009254954,0.0016916334,0.0061016814,0.008095701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023974577,0.0004864967,0.0011749588,0.00087583734,0.055511385,0.020083496,0.007550649,0.0076151034,0.0013815567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013231012,0.000012699337,0.0007072926,0.000021595155,0.000013015244,0.00003524863,0.0011583127,0.00012569815,0.00005058204,0.99172837,0.0016712957,0.004462662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013189525,0.000006301255,0.0006821369,0.00003647052,0.0000050826147,0.000032484422,0.00052758685,0.00013456022,0.000040479405,0.9907838,0.007728707,0.000009226874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004227619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003056086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0111579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032641725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039260164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059009314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766094995","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2015.01.005","title":"Commitment problems in conflict resolution","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict resolution; Resolution (logic); Conflict resolution research; Mechanism (biology); Outcome (game theory); Opting out; Social psychology; Political science; Microeconomics; Economics; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07318520298246559,"score_gpt":0.25873373481378664,"score_spread":0.18554853183132106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766094995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6496504,0.0027016448,0.14970286,0.0341684,0.0005945688,0.00022710697,0.0002173394,0.00010415197,0.16263357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99271834,0.00020829578,0.0034653433,0.00022143112,0.00011824073,0.000053551135,0.000038521586,0.000015391106,0.003160896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523073,0.003195253,0.00021130644,0.00038604662,0.00045240726,0.00052431336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95008874,0.040931202,0.0031235977,0.0023448442,0.0015214542,0.001990277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008028477,0.00037919127,0.00090103666,0.0009598759,0.0026836938,0.0040505524,0.0015067217,0.0038354776,0.017391516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06301767,0.0006654441,0.00054165657,0.0014156556,0.003598706,0.005449562,0.0023256827,0.005623176,0.00061019236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023722177,0.00021274199,0.0033723009,0.00007062961,0.0000636135,0.0003220102,0.0014924245,0.010578692,0.0002882157,0.96090096,0.004951539,0.017509613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000860231,0.000026650541,0.0011705179,0.00002061442,0.000018739252,0.00011106797,0.00081339624,0.032049354,0.0000773311,0.9641706,0.0014409621,0.000014723133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019502782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001313251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017391516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012453117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012800357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05818039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766198724","doi":"10.1177/0019793919864263","title":"Third-Party Intervention and the Preservation of Bargaining Relationships","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Labor Relations Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Mediation; Dispute resolution; Intervention (counseling); Collective bargaining; Third party; Labor disputes; Process (computing); Political science; Panel data; Arbitration; Longitudinal data; Psychology; Economics; Business; Law and economics; Social psychology; Law; Econometrics; Computer science; Labor relations; Data mining; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.09239179501902059,"score_gpt":0.2512468739728758,"score_spread":0.15885507895385523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766198724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755922,0.002609586,0.007726818,0.0009667084,0.000026541995,0.000064322325,0.00026787582,0.00003636781,0.0127096865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972669,0.0004202896,0.0009125928,0.00006762603,0.000018840688,0.000020840824,0.00015967205,0.0000050951303,0.0011283712],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894042,0.006017412,0.0006512044,0.0007120371,0.0021732934,0.0010418828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81718653,0.09998863,0.06469741,0.01036621,0.0049867737,0.0027744037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01772131,0.00014187057,0.00048362956,0.0013732107,0.0011780328,0.0023434714,0.000913834,0.0010746532,0.0068863635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.080927595,0.00023285016,0.00043213004,0.001917062,0.0015061708,0.0015134182,0.0016121822,0.0018940342,0.00079390995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001515024,0.0012762679,0.77645063,0.00022138473,0.0003424828,0.00031906684,0.0029579832,0.009490335,0.002093806,0.048154324,0.0015175531,0.1556612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020618316,0.0014109398,0.9162474,0.00019651969,0.00019124408,0.00067025033,0.0021179845,0.009606059,0.0031886783,0.04878386,0.017302262,0.00007857321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035829877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041061253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01772131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015032508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019029423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09372038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768031003","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3057093","title":"Privatizing Law: Is Rule of Law an Equilibrium without Private Ordering?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Private law; Rule of law; Law; Statutory law; Municipal law; Premise; Public law; Law and economics; Generality; Economics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.027131713020709578,"score_gpt":0.24540597554323137,"score_spread":0.2182742625225218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768031003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40761137,0.0005229881,0.2500654,0.055875033,0.0004138512,0.00030926385,0.0013375867,0.0006424663,0.28322196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767636,0.00024965254,0.008202918,0.0012095277,0.00026110045,0.00009546027,0.00010976789,0.00006914186,0.013038817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941299,0.00152502,0.00028316717,0.0012735629,0.0012906635,0.0014977485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97868437,0.01124399,0.0031874683,0.0037568696,0.0015191971,0.0016079965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005145771,0.00041939053,0.0027870887,0.0011525396,0.0027182796,0.0090002045,0.0022857764,0.006496362,0.022811621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031721465,0.00075555465,0.0014592981,0.0015365024,0.007940146,0.01192531,0.0026256822,0.006682164,0.0020884303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031122487,0.00006150674,0.00044304706,0.000025542227,0.00001961813,0.0000669591,0.00012813947,0.0017938061,0.00017953463,0.99201804,0.002030899,0.0032017736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032661923,0.000010259178,0.00022990015,0.000006984086,0.000006545717,0.000027907292,0.0000643421,0.0053204913,0.00007845813,0.9934227,0.00079079485,0.000008876099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004607107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004625459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022811621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031747315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005573856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07631248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771208851","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3083013","title":"The Limits of Limited Liability: Evidence from Industrial Pollution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidiary; Insolvency; Liability; Business; Moral hazard; Investment (military); Compensation (psychology); Empirical evidence; Production (economics); Actuarial science; Finance; Economics; Incentive; Microeconomics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07231023431723911,"score_gpt":0.25353728163016453,"score_spread":0.18122704731292544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771208851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8779494,0.007975323,0.0038756265,0.012423141,0.00004530848,0.00003120017,0.0006664442,0.000044456843,0.09698908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967077,0.0013190919,0.00013581268,0.00051722635,0.00005984224,0.000009684288,0.00014191437,0.000005798568,0.0011030148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928865,0.0031087766,0.00041120293,0.0006992636,0.0022105179,0.0006838134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7985918,0.15055864,0.026924456,0.011345017,0.009018571,0.0035615978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005733293,0.00018984138,0.00086562126,0.002338193,0.0013805671,0.0030261383,0.0018572834,0.0031335396,0.008852884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067872144,0.00038059772,0.000546397,0.0023622676,0.0063833557,0.004144468,0.0031257146,0.0029763624,0.00074660406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045797206,0.0024528466,0.44158953,0.0016281034,0.0011761336,0.004069801,0.007879295,0.019124929,0.00257164,0.377381,0.01924674,0.11830024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004459961,0.0013075755,0.4800749,0.001134809,0.00079923775,0.0022140536,0.006621461,0.0043996833,0.0031953843,0.46021658,0.03945756,0.00013288527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060886014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039660903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008852884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077259046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010536516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030320942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771655407","doi":"10.18601/01210483.v38n104.02","title":"Análisis Económico del Derecho penal y Derecho penal liberal: confluencias y bifurcaciones","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Derecho Penal y Criminología","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.0913632667646924,"score_gpt":0.274929569491179,"score_spread":0.1835663027264866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771655407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70404553,0.0057182433,0.019416386,0.019793538,0.00021412021,0.00011442572,0.0015602205,0.00004880725,0.24908885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853028,0.0013760985,0.0013639533,0.0005436708,0.00009083823,0.000054199987,0.00026759607,0.000030490784,0.010970356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946103,0.0020853737,0.0002175567,0.00049657427,0.0019751089,0.000615068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96809834,0.018403243,0.004306308,0.0020225262,0.0062460965,0.00092344685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00567498,0.00023157071,0.00050789915,0.006939184,0.0018862517,0.0058072926,0.0007782146,0.0010504408,0.011898236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037379645,0.00015452567,0.00043785982,0.007126862,0.006697437,0.0036145241,0.0027376516,0.002074244,0.0007343797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015824877,0.00004835446,0.0953552,0.0001792566,0.000098196884,0.00016695619,0.0077861506,0.0015128946,0.0002708207,0.8430122,0.007330064,0.04408166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027524704,0.00008383197,0.4407729,0.0008186357,0.00012559358,0.00031491616,0.028940797,0.008291524,0.000944821,0.4194906,0.10010796,0.000080938735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010385667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009056467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011898236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030272764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024696272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039803624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782731800","doi":"10.7202/1042761ar","title":"Vincent Caron, Jalons pour une théorie pragmatique de l’interprétation du contrat : du temple de la volonté à la pyramide de sens, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2016, 428 p., ISBN 978-2-89400-384-8","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0068480026006759315,"score_gpt":0.21192123267513213,"score_spread":0.20507323007445621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782731800","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011592295,0.5701082,0.007285947,0.3056183,0.005440835,0.000029334422,0.00036878776,0.0001127195,0.10987663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11815654,0.47217107,0.013145226,0.05352409,0.010349574,0.00016981571,0.0006524929,0.00084714626,0.33098418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996951,0.0011885698,0.00010478229,0.0004869405,0.001057852,0.00021080746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725276,0.0017791713,0.00016601478,0.00013949734,0.00051875046,0.00014378087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030024198,0.0011178959,0.0008808966,0.0020427424,0.004170698,0.0074523706,0.0021455816,0.0065548373,0.025920503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068249954,0.000957133,0.0005750067,0.004252521,0.010385148,0.015182923,0.0020915233,0.008756175,0.005906769],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002137657,0.000011118791,0.00022977781,0.00022179064,0.00001175064,0.000068992566,0.0030057137,0.00017096658,0.000094635085,0.50489676,0.46528375,0.025983393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015748245,0.0000068041622,0.00063361286,0.00048029108,0.000006586178,0.00012293663,0.0013582206,0.0002450662,0.00010539271,0.20095362,0.7960334,0.0000383227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1312866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15654649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1312866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015002933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00829929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26104492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783759930","doi":"","title":"The fundamentals of Quebec business law and ethics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business ethics; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.027759396247975795,"score_gpt":0.2066575016514818,"score_spread":0.178898105403506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783759930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004753843,0.030801004,0.0039999294,0.0339061,0.001054133,0.000118022894,0.0018794668,0.00017900558,0.92330855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15543081,0.020803265,0.005572982,0.004566205,0.0005443235,0.00016983034,0.0007400537,0.00011803822,0.81205446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986928,0.00022650107,0.00004121745,0.00010633177,0.00064702355,0.00028612738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983714,0.00039245287,0.00006402898,0.00007983778,0.00092261186,0.00016963782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000990207,0.0005401871,0.0004055181,0.0025178636,0.006193976,0.0070343046,0.0010330756,0.0023911337,0.034715347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041674552,0.00042551325,0.00027097244,0.0035283442,0.0041933977,0.0018100328,0.0005249665,0.0029243326,0.0032237128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064319383,0.000017164992,0.0006841264,0.000048445847,0.0000037789353,0.00008126008,0.0010992481,0.00044816307,0.00007214983,0.7118955,0.25407684,0.031566955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003985388,0.00000476726,0.0037802192,0.00022129729,0.0000034832117,0.00006023794,0.00067973643,0.0007875941,0.00005095855,0.043761253,0.9506232,0.000023240942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9689131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97505015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94369316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056306858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065205745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40853673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783873380","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v11n1p1","title":"Legal Basis of Common Approaches to Object to a Criminal Judgment in Iran and England Penal Systems","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Appeal; Law; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Political science; Relation (database); Criminal code; Object (grammar); Sociology; Legislation; Computer science","score_opus":0.0889570056406189,"score_gpt":0.24039581977657373,"score_spread":0.15143881413595484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783873380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7653803,0.0015195069,0.008447549,0.010955517,0.000094317336,0.0001849397,0.0001822295,0.000044396613,0.21319121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99474263,0.00011516084,0.0008423398,0.00022354913,0.000017951124,0.000024024055,0.000027076325,0.000005387017,0.0040019155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99055016,0.0028714538,0.00055548345,0.001124368,0.0030764544,0.0018220817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923666,0.0023121263,0.0019078309,0.00090996205,0.001881155,0.0006222541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004387193,0.00015825684,0.00026293733,0.0024558336,0.004069032,0.0046694158,0.00083606085,0.0013820383,0.0049813692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01317107,0.00025639872,0.0003196016,0.0013239364,0.010824369,0.0025403353,0.0025823002,0.002090733,0.00040388232],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041631807,0.00007214389,0.023711892,0.000057425554,0.00001658221,0.0004757977,0.019055516,0.00037303034,0.0004550622,0.939475,0.00258954,0.013676438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010496165,0.00016397146,0.32756934,0.00042382482,0.00009868748,0.0013030426,0.050654426,0.0055372445,0.0015870024,0.50092536,0.11143724,0.00019490914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03433597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04289696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03433597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072017037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043335487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06827223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784608659","doi":"","title":"Financial Market Manipulation and Insider Trading: An International Study of Enforcement Approaches","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Enforcement; Insider trading; Business; Market manipulation; Jurisdiction; Punitive damages; Finance; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0694373041140488,"score_gpt":0.24572139206057653,"score_spread":0.17628408794652772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784608659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71190006,0.005243655,0.015303748,0.0052190735,0.00006122977,0.00015205456,0.00013332526,0.000042650638,0.26194426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942608,0.0014016624,0.0011479553,0.00028397472,0.00006535886,0.000026324336,0.000044765027,0.000010847755,0.002758404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945738,0.0026677402,0.00038619398,0.0005497475,0.0013000758,0.00052260363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.934916,0.02522509,0.033779137,0.0028968141,0.0021913608,0.000991573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060852407,0.00029653357,0.000595356,0.002573765,0.0015632318,0.005412447,0.0009092032,0.0012827812,0.005762754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021729046,0.0002985576,0.00071404706,0.0038742519,0.0047883247,0.00456816,0.0021429667,0.002311448,0.00027761483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002918105,0.0009029404,0.3824555,0.00049762084,0.00058088184,0.0012327267,0.016289923,0.00960004,0.0012595843,0.4741289,0.0039753313,0.10878477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016786951,0.0005796496,0.77897173,0.0013367989,0.0005785572,0.0018942716,0.02139426,0.03705989,0.002282039,0.09568266,0.059858542,0.00019368595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008370564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007717836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008370564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003028297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019189443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032182217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784704950","doi":"10.1628/093245606779252706","title":"Split-Award Tort Reform, Firm's Level of Care, and Litigation Outcomes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Tort reform; Tort; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Liability","score_opus":0.02298201394820186,"score_gpt":0.215960064606264,"score_spread":0.19297805065806212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784704950","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880519,0.0005604243,0.001227224,0.0022402308,0.000022924643,0.000077744335,0.00036892304,0.00001250035,0.0074380683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987684,0.00008573041,0.00010445013,0.000069534275,0.000019481136,0.000017424018,0.00009200811,0.0000011619142,0.0008417413],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993971,0.0019644725,0.00035647096,0.00046560823,0.000838433,0.002404117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9240853,0.03168009,0.033643402,0.001842393,0.002809879,0.005939019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00728349,0.00039571736,0.0012957279,0.0016339149,0.0013051783,0.0042565893,0.0018440605,0.0026172865,0.013042557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03599533,0.00036655058,0.0007789937,0.0016422606,0.0032872986,0.0028674244,0.0029832304,0.0032785705,0.0007574968],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041147103,0.006958765,0.64010936,0.0003502113,0.001032591,0.0013600324,0.0014937267,0.0933847,0.00207018,0.20539993,0.006557782,0.0371681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096707535,0.0059866216,0.76776016,0.00021133876,0.0012347678,0.0007148265,0.0052014138,0.111469164,0.003493306,0.096558705,0.006162457,0.00024018818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012939996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015783472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013042557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00726121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026835597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05268407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788531467","doi":"","title":"Calculating Fair Market Value in Legal Valuations: Do Adjustments in Value for Non-Systematic Risk Violate the Fair Market Value Standard?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Real estate; Value (mathematics); Fair value; Fair market value; Market value; Portfolio; Economics; Actuarial science; Business; Financial economics; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.03185666841374054,"score_gpt":0.29163698272909383,"score_spread":0.2597803143153533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788531467","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053871553,0.004091955,0.8275809,0.021870572,0.0014971124,0.00048546426,0.00024692982,0.00030862784,0.09004688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8112152,0.001571723,0.17681837,0.0035681876,0.0010254021,0.0007923458,0.00019069819,0.0003389259,0.0044791796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9135963,0.04634702,0.0040031527,0.0066593317,0.027099315,0.00229494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7856256,0.14188558,0.021178015,0.029304322,0.020433323,0.0015731582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10161515,0.0011393239,0.002064975,0.004048266,0.0032087592,0.013108207,0.0050797528,0.0052587143,0.005904387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47677666,0.00082695554,0.0015492309,0.004805662,0.019166019,0.033439975,0.0063453554,0.007297114,0.00159943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069837115,0.00007240259,0.0059464327,0.00012393777,0.00009700482,0.00013143502,0.0017544252,0.0077537796,0.00019724657,0.9029136,0.005490509,0.07544946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013979449,0.000032352276,0.0016576723,0.00022592802,0.000014810851,0.00007393035,0.0003155873,0.013767518,0.0002309135,0.97780824,0.0058210287,0.000038032933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074347914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005685694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10161515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00662379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00709531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5373987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788698126","doi":"10.1007/s10551-018-3786-5","title":"Executive Compensation and Employee Remuneration: The Flexible Principles of Justice in Pay","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Concordia University","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Remuneration; Executive compensation; Compensation (psychology); Business ethics; Benchmarking; Normative; Economic Justice; Quality of Life Research; Business; Job evaluation; Meritocracy; Loyalty; Work (physics); Organizational justice; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Public relations; Job satisfaction; Marketing; Economics; Management; Microeconomics; Psychology; Social psychology; Organizational commitment; Political science; Law; Job analysis","score_opus":0.14257160437466973,"score_gpt":0.28727418542687866,"score_spread":0.14470258105220893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788698126","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14354096,0.014488755,0.10829719,0.245261,0.0017870376,0.00014010856,0.00019421117,0.000055074903,0.48623562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790126,0.0012204503,0.0040524905,0.0050703622,0.00086447777,0.000066339264,0.000015884038,0.00002642576,0.009670932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860319,0.0073724613,0.0006286872,0.0011722606,0.0026944347,0.00210025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761829,0.017418677,0.0013819004,0.00211844,0.0021189624,0.00077914516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015178475,0.0004746773,0.00097007304,0.0012538335,0.004758437,0.012275478,0.0017367144,0.010940382,0.0038245197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04420949,0.0005024119,0.0008481555,0.0013796897,0.028845737,0.009892336,0.0033199086,0.009306077,0.00043676095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008935757,0.000013603953,0.00021219207,0.0000067931965,0.000003527566,0.000016666007,0.00045876976,0.00038410217,0.000017973718,0.99599373,0.000926213,0.0019575092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008688354,0.0000052661353,0.00039179297,0.00003418907,0.000004278105,0.000012935896,0.00024174593,0.00056756794,0.000028506194,0.9948778,0.0038190824,0.000008202607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009812171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009979446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015178475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00475951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009691817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08027238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789124364","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Competition Bureau jointly lays 77 charges against 11 individuals and 9 companies in the construction industry in connection with a Quebec bid-rigging case (Carrière Bernier, Cie Wilfrid Allen)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Connection (principal bundle); Carrion; History; Economic history; Business; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.02257465428196629,"score_gpt":0.2095573586724036,"score_spread":0.18698270439043732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789124364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12509812,0.0059352852,0.0019000721,0.1601237,0.0039552385,0.0009403958,0.0037000475,0.00030462284,0.69804263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20769428,0.0017510067,0.0013181826,0.0468781,0.00043146132,0.00015028418,0.0009962774,0.000095896656,0.7406845],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936552,0.00031434908,0.00016930535,0.0003871596,0.0028414417,0.0026325397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499184,0.000798103,0.00022079801,0.00018334377,0.002543797,0.0012621329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025644775,0.0007354005,0.0007041704,0.0026516558,0.025594356,0.0045104586,0.0030062976,0.0144271925,0.026039436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005720214,0.0011473808,0.00109409,0.00227421,0.003472205,0.0008293592,0.0020528007,0.0073881373,0.0027093235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000811434,0.00016270964,0.016366396,0.000098997,0.00007603883,0.003433132,0.001537624,0.0005646678,0.001136075,0.028293274,0.92427385,0.023976132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059498554,0.00007446326,0.06450876,0.00012420364,0.00006832044,0.00067576184,0.0031216634,0.0008189111,0.00095595437,0.0014283515,0.92798567,0.00017835571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98165405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05431184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05431184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08816512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39406186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789391116","doi":"10.7202/1043455ar","title":"COMMENT METTRE FIN À SON DIFFÉREND SANS PROCÈS, SELON LE CODE DE PROCÉDURE CIVILE DU QUÉBEC","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.017869145630009537,"score_gpt":0.19012401541159676,"score_spread":0.17225486978158722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789391116","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041410517,0.0094296355,0.0065088253,0.5683391,0.013627492,0.00012792555,0.0021239868,0.00045865696,0.3579738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19625211,0.003904915,0.0030961644,0.15100905,0.0019011099,0.0001408169,0.00061410904,0.00025891783,0.64282274],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946209,0.00094775093,0.00023362724,0.00080785283,0.0021867764,0.0012031469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99251914,0.0019388769,0.00027808978,0.00044331906,0.004316475,0.0005041285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038062693,0.000565529,0.00070934783,0.00072872237,0.011388994,0.008862203,0.0014346732,0.00958749,0.023451135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018257722,0.00042211157,0.0007987916,0.0013979207,0.003465526,0.0036410466,0.001084684,0.011706926,0.004088194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014103687,0.00004628928,0.007448331,0.0001647186,0.000044101183,0.00056495133,0.0056329407,0.00059099717,0.0012313527,0.40762144,0.55159676,0.024917113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049342663,0.000021235399,0.016955778,0.00029623535,0.000032973127,0.00020884305,0.0033443675,0.0005569244,0.0008223284,0.011983575,0.9656231,0.00010532641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9435132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9613765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056486785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027470447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052004084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19931298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789750730","doi":"","title":"Extraordinary damages in Canadian employment law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Law; Labour law; Political science; Economics; Law and economics","score_opus":0.029234489111257415,"score_gpt":0.22022411834226466,"score_spread":0.19098962923100724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789750730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008855054,0.031009948,0.0009504971,0.07044099,0.0018939378,0.0000938498,0.0015813671,0.0000963637,0.88507795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29715982,0.034652468,0.0021656202,0.02927419,0.002338436,0.00011856953,0.0012258518,0.00011120871,0.63295376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643457,0.00020342966,0.000099746874,0.00023674287,0.0020478603,0.0009776412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968579,0.00068308366,0.00011388728,0.0001857088,0.0018121331,0.00034737954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018542655,0.00053963007,0.00048353832,0.0037671637,0.011097868,0.007729783,0.0020122498,0.006242995,0.01747147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009710402,0.0005980395,0.0005063767,0.0048492188,0.0060533634,0.0023379037,0.0011992616,0.004716815,0.0011079953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000854406,0.000016985914,0.0008382468,0.000066232846,0.0000050145613,0.0000865014,0.0009289676,0.0006588795,0.000056305515,0.6083773,0.3679477,0.021009322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007916252,0.0000064325104,0.010717263,0.0003338451,0.000014561423,0.00006516319,0.0008372651,0.0006852252,0.00007469714,0.06434736,0.92285573,0.000054607866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9865643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09509634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09509634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14333917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6899755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790957739","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Supreme Court allows indirect purchasers to sue for damages caused by a price fixing cartel (Infineon, Pro-Sys, Sun-Rype)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Damages; Supreme court; Price fixing; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Industrial organization","score_opus":0.02016614684966276,"score_gpt":0.2056002747725472,"score_spread":0.18543412792288444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790957739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066931844,0.0010966453,0.0018678185,0.02489412,0.0010316579,0.00039228407,0.0027371612,0.00035105582,0.90069747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3779944,0.0010119504,0.002184703,0.0387655,0.0003959111,0.00017265999,0.0011560633,0.0001401768,0.5781787],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918303,0.00023340428,0.00018317877,0.0006659674,0.0041807718,0.0029063413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99356306,0.0014919435,0.0002344795,0.00051562005,0.0032065292,0.000988324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031461692,0.0008454521,0.00074406056,0.002298194,0.018299876,0.00915083,0.0028873126,0.0111376,0.02775617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009734771,0.0013651255,0.0013227094,0.0021041948,0.0044523957,0.0015605517,0.0025492422,0.011950058,0.004136916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016803254,0.00023177611,0.020250687,0.00008411821,0.00013768802,0.0013398582,0.0024517248,0.00066287507,0.002633418,0.42212433,0.5204791,0.029436402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022005168,0.00012524973,0.043128725,0.00022557919,0.00033176734,0.00051139813,0.0022115947,0.0023301714,0.0030693798,0.01933705,0.9281569,0.00035211424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95455885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98730993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04544115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035648514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07501266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25864923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791218475","doi":"","title":"Experts for Hire: A Dangerous Practice Which Increases the Risk of Bias and Disadvantages the Accused","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Context (archaeology); Law; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Relevance (law); Divergence (linguistics); Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.06541093926273694,"score_gpt":0.2976347320918023,"score_spread":0.23222379282906536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791218475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20462567,0.0012772419,0.16129547,0.13143815,0.0007677953,0.0006693542,0.0002599843,0.0003507073,0.49931565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90759254,0.00036829617,0.015972706,0.011224695,0.00033008473,0.00018721665,0.000032604814,0.0000661205,0.06422579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865954,0.0055568777,0.00036222572,0.0022062548,0.0038449927,0.0014342662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97683185,0.009925055,0.0036774331,0.0056599258,0.002422183,0.001483515],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011355085,0.00048107115,0.00088516163,0.0011377892,0.005243662,0.0071239644,0.0030457827,0.010344513,0.008434641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040541314,0.0005960478,0.0007286497,0.0010702386,0.01188339,0.005855168,0.004819783,0.0066808066,0.003010833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038267972,0.00008183548,0.00453831,0.000045796794,0.000024359426,0.0003468893,0.003269298,0.000908509,0.0004579127,0.9570185,0.008626943,0.024643414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015557645,0.00024294779,0.006417303,0.00027304282,0.00006610681,0.0016139268,0.003182772,0.011288902,0.0013931507,0.8424943,0.13275956,0.00011235562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008704674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015246073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99475634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034359675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005899013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060052156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791610759","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of British Columbia denies disclosure based on public interest privilege (Pro-Sys / Microsoft)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Privilege (computing)","score_opus":0.022661110306411804,"score_gpt":0.19210761962635972,"score_spread":0.16944650931994792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791610759","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07888122,0.0022613686,0.0021477,0.09162726,0.0028440517,0.000499086,0.005271758,0.000631634,0.8158358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32404253,0.0013994657,0.0023356746,0.08913395,0.0005798878,0.00035633592,0.001523918,0.00020192398,0.58042634],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98600626,0.0008641027,0.0008319423,0.0011512358,0.0068135285,0.004332971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97664964,0.009450632,0.0009978577,0.0013490757,0.009575608,0.0019770535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006590802,0.0006895616,0.00113257,0.0029993397,0.016611971,0.013848916,0.0032048693,0.01915113,0.01367478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02996764,0.0019032031,0.0008681365,0.0034029698,0.0044378145,0.0019788258,0.0024731655,0.016946683,0.0031334935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018971624,0.00015468012,0.009558192,0.00017680414,0.00008545246,0.001271039,0.0026521836,0.00056158047,0.001712229,0.3654811,0.59395564,0.024201345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002253328,0.00008558576,0.027942218,0.0008861574,0.0002919187,0.00036307942,0.0030053058,0.002040102,0.0031572457,0.034378603,0.9272581,0.0003664572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9041339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9600256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095866084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034852322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11387921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25287253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791986149","doi":"10.7202/1043170ar","title":"Event History Analysis of Grievance Arbitration in Ontario: Labour Justice Delayed?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Arbitration; Jurisdiction; Dispute resolution; Credibility; Legalism (Western philosophy); Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.04049673932912934,"score_gpt":0.22465954286625692,"score_spread":0.18416280353712758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791986149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922931,0.00022306756,0.0005331707,0.00043559077,0.0000088970655,0.00007798988,0.0011088978,0.0000058803103,0.0053134263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967122,0.00016873924,0.00031257607,0.000031867585,0.0000057785446,0.000043431974,0.0007234716,0.000003530848,0.0019983023],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843484,0.00024264588,0.00014398672,0.00018927582,0.00062525895,0.00036403234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986424,0.0038926683,0.004497477,0.0005694386,0.003776655,0.00083971664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021475132,0.000149717,0.00030884557,0.002708553,0.0023524584,0.0016322022,0.0007771057,0.0003461805,0.0033247687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016503615,0.00016661195,0.00026386476,0.0051547424,0.0012778102,0.0009354331,0.001326664,0.0004538519,0.00022788247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017390338,0.00006276267,0.9302229,0.00014434253,0.00004596455,0.0007301026,0.041575167,0.0005641572,0.00073418475,0.002572482,0.0022427277,0.02093111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029283224,0.000021220954,0.9745772,0.000030843636,0.000011968191,0.000042474527,0.01889066,0.00063779607,0.00013959332,0.00034672965,0.005286101,0.000012396727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8415942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89990765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15840578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016357373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009786154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3186773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792436328","doi":"10.5085/jfe432.1","title":"Assessing Economic Damages in Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Litigation: The State of Iowa","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kimberly-Clark (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Wrongful death; Personal injury; Jury; Statute; Law; Common law; State (computer science); Plaintiff; Forensic engineering; Political science; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.03258037504749762,"score_gpt":0.2500861851020027,"score_spread":0.2175058100545051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792436328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9595393,0.00040155236,0.008273307,0.0013298378,0.000041036456,0.0001526834,0.0012295103,0.000042994106,0.028989727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99593604,0.00023952582,0.0018183513,0.00007886747,0.000009736776,0.00004948644,0.0003604023,0.0000054707925,0.0015020983],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778193,0.0006367659,0.00022152362,0.0002934121,0.00068878196,0.00037758015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904642,0.0045779506,0.0014212815,0.00046660483,0.002501805,0.00056818494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029782832,0.0002686078,0.0005170021,0.0050653545,0.001333864,0.0047098384,0.0011593347,0.0010165408,0.0047493135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013415564,0.0004186781,0.0004467706,0.002836766,0.0015606744,0.0014006897,0.002025826,0.001064491,0.00041886955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047239658,0.0006093836,0.8191854,0.0001847755,0.0004029699,0.0013747342,0.0024283938,0.06796312,0.0018746232,0.050291732,0.006733099,0.048479434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002180681,0.0005582588,0.7770974,0.0006312231,0.00042115984,0.0012071537,0.017206844,0.13197497,0.0027003898,0.04417992,0.0235567,0.00024799188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21666893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26908848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21666893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054885484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035845116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43081558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793736340","doi":"10.3389/fphy.2018.00001","title":"Priority Queuing on the Docket: Universality of Judicial Dispute Resolution Timing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Physics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Remand (court procedure); Political science; Certiorari; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.03399565988224952,"score_gpt":0.2220811248615912,"score_spread":0.1880854649793417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793736340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9445953,0.0010029878,0.042635407,0.0010867699,0.00005442946,0.00006486159,0.0004039274,0.00022162375,0.009934643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977604,0.00012236876,0.0012384373,0.000051233346,0.000027944965,0.000010319503,0.00014850954,0.000024488176,0.00061619625],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633944,0.00084864115,0.0002497974,0.0011603499,0.00082789845,0.0005739998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91944,0.051602397,0.015965724,0.0064265523,0.0034307288,0.0031345764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008182943,0.00018199816,0.0008865133,0.0024888406,0.0010249077,0.0036604148,0.0017153968,0.0011283132,0.0064609577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11070876,0.0006475205,0.0004905255,0.0024987035,0.0020658064,0.0036340489,0.0014902807,0.0025434326,0.0007742377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060367736,0.00034164902,0.6855351,0.00022564422,0.0003143991,0.0006846905,0.0049998714,0.03897942,0.007591571,0.1578664,0.004251431,0.09860622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080707825,0.00023037811,0.74494207,0.00010521939,0.00010231392,0.0007041345,0.002174059,0.104833454,0.0021179568,0.1380277,0.0064966595,0.00018536625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012818812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008490789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012818812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020512238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012726567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04327607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794169462","doi":"","title":"The US Court of Appeal for the 5th Circuit decides on whether a \"standard-setting\" association should be considered as a single entity and dismisses the case for lack of evidence (Abraham & Veneklasen / AQHA)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jury; Verdict; Law; Elite; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; History; Politics","score_opus":0.18814670094237146,"score_gpt":0.31073015145979116,"score_spread":0.1225834505174197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794169462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038780633,0.0018716546,0.004094675,0.35107508,0.01535746,0.0011408109,0.006105643,0.0010225901,0.5805514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21879831,0.0012042864,0.0051982244,0.44543627,0.005026639,0.0009854177,0.0023678832,0.00027751757,0.32070553],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98720413,0.0011568189,0.000952544,0.0014971457,0.00494339,0.0042459313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97912973,0.01010823,0.00056213996,0.0012155785,0.007079414,0.0019049596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010711787,0.0007610346,0.0022671518,0.0027914736,0.0154361,0.011507623,0.00406627,0.040651113,0.032322586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038107786,0.0017106191,0.0025928013,0.0026894533,0.003797981,0.0029045702,0.0025169728,0.02126859,0.009606743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017011592,0.0002219513,0.0040418487,0.00008669427,0.000070139504,0.0010628098,0.000654005,0.0002466195,0.00091755344,0.20228249,0.7754036,0.014842138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041197526,0.00031513747,0.016067468,0.0007114569,0.00050532114,0.00059246045,0.0018514373,0.0027117226,0.002209458,0.04688928,0.9273778,0.00035660304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1371375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26058158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1371375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077976617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026007771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27267855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794887160","doi":"10.11575/prism/34168","title":"Restrictive Covenants in Employment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covenant; Business; Labour economics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019564221342538872,"score_gpt":0.18731980161580733,"score_spread":0.16775558027326845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794887160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023286806,0.0060186437,0.029534157,0.030420752,0.001255903,0.0002119019,0.00012743025,0.00010744035,0.909037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8517248,0.0024527973,0.009243877,0.023330737,0.0018698118,0.0009911917,0.00017591013,0.00019047593,0.110020414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9640577,0.014010838,0.0029254819,0.006087278,0.0077666957,0.0051520066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98342043,0.008852459,0.0010751404,0.003260942,0.0024023338,0.0009886854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021564186,0.0009213529,0.0012054329,0.002017844,0.017990151,0.019195266,0.00334332,0.016117115,0.015224318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036283262,0.0011767194,0.0017283066,0.0021419495,0.045334827,0.015263078,0.015730206,0.023450932,0.002597289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041706166,0.0000049451505,0.000056415018,0.0000060940424,0.0000015962584,0.000031338775,0.0005618884,0.00006715557,0.000023296821,0.99719715,0.0011519901,0.00089382316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002473168,0.000033803495,0.00033053092,0.00028417725,0.00001042192,0.00011025018,0.0012162646,0.0005171214,0.00019825473,0.9014662,0.09575815,0.00005006225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021301895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013911927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021564186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00980363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011272795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11404365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795276161","doi":"10.1016/j.irle.2018.03.001","title":"Securities settlements as examples of crisis-driven regulation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Law and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Human settlement; Settlement (finance); Enforcement; Commission; Financial crisis; Business; Financial market; Payment; Service (business); Financial services; Finance; Economics; Economy; Law; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.03717520637511957,"score_gpt":0.2652567444929568,"score_spread":0.2280815381178372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795276161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14074427,0.004811835,0.11899578,0.022801297,0.0010838236,0.00044876712,0.00087385677,0.0009826338,0.70925766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9564318,0.001497761,0.010252245,0.0022124087,0.0005109579,0.00023426978,0.00018487252,0.00010031101,0.02857548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942175,0.0019724017,0.00033530523,0.00080634776,0.0017306193,0.0009378352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989883,0.0047751064,0.0022696848,0.0017639697,0.0008192486,0.0004889625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048316587,0.000305284,0.00045137454,0.0024567426,0.0027599311,0.00592968,0.0016991299,0.0062511186,0.010586794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018265741,0.0003695949,0.0008509921,0.0026930752,0.006365018,0.0042565186,0.0033712138,0.005627607,0.0010938784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016730119,0.000025031097,0.00074469205,0.000025001753,0.000011018616,0.00016954303,0.0004996401,0.0010118263,0.00020185468,0.98628265,0.0055273697,0.005484682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005743766,0.000030333404,0.0036354433,0.00009537109,0.000018345121,0.0003322039,0.00058317976,0.006547731,0.0005082167,0.9145486,0.07360453,0.000038629325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022420413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029782436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010586794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019245407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021707779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035416365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796170590","doi":"10.29173/alr1269","title":"A Critical Analysis of Civil Procedure Rules 187 and 190: Stringency without Efficacy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rescission; Discretion; Settlement (finance); Civil procedure; Law; Economic Justice; Relevance (law); Process (computing); Economics; Political science; Law and economics; Public administration; Business; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.02631640230612301,"score_gpt":0.26248099808989667,"score_spread":0.23616459578377366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796170590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045057546,0.004649329,0.04135982,0.037949685,0.00071834243,0.00025172482,0.00020037088,0.00006770645,0.86974555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92580676,0.0018423036,0.008455942,0.0076341145,0.0007335221,0.00017803536,0.0000807318,0.00008991196,0.05517878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916822,0.0026740236,0.00024048158,0.0008266649,0.0031782722,0.0013983416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98480046,0.01064051,0.0010417874,0.0010241371,0.0021999383,0.0002932482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009125707,0.00037168403,0.0004217001,0.0028149036,0.004972155,0.008678246,0.0016286116,0.0037657127,0.0077260314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02417518,0.0005669768,0.00070647156,0.0014467391,0.026590303,0.0062463535,0.0019304897,0.0061156554,0.0006963345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054881366,0.00000241538,0.000059524064,0.0000055658497,9.460947e-7,0.000019155696,0.00027916054,0.00017760607,0.000023703378,0.9969386,0.0011087921,0.0013792003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001896439,0.000029759982,0.0014937525,0.00012414901,0.000018122613,0.00006153811,0.0012655195,0.0018951446,0.00037987315,0.9041144,0.09057149,0.00002723865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06499644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052324805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9350036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021815406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01297413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15828258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796499197","doi":"","title":"La Sagesse Du Législateur Québécois Et La Médiation: Comment La Théorie Des Jeux Appuie Son Coup De Pouce (The Wisdom of the Quebec Lawmaker and Mediation: How Game Theory Provides a Nudge in the Right Direction)","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Mediation; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.008479679046423615,"score_gpt":0.21510655774651027,"score_spread":0.20662687870008667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796499197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16982064,0.006120603,0.029087078,0.089421034,0.00043333293,0.00011843455,0.00019342624,0.000078559184,0.7047269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9613144,0.00077510264,0.0012761265,0.0016877472,0.000027331975,0.0000384377,0.000017554765,0.000021232738,0.034842003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964127,0.0016414745,0.000056191264,0.000403987,0.00067923643,0.00080653053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953316,0.0024411867,0.00025094324,0.00029799162,0.0013231582,0.00035510608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004923725,0.0004047648,0.0004229683,0.0012097867,0.01034502,0.0087658325,0.0016686996,0.0036605226,0.017336937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009039228,0.00033360143,0.00047680078,0.001271198,0.017890356,0.0049877237,0.0024897924,0.00358588,0.0006661123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016094813,0.000009996909,0.0012964925,0.0000339979,0.000010277992,0.00014300786,0.012779343,0.000785611,0.00013446406,0.9754076,0.003908208,0.0054748678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008827026,0.00008982044,0.016528198,0.0009566084,0.00014301998,0.0002997117,0.07843384,0.014567922,0.0011495559,0.5239726,0.36356086,0.00020963416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8322026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8630309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16779739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041945525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032970756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33757114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796751180","doi":"","title":"Canada : La Cour supérieure du Québec autorise un deuxième recours collectif dans l'affaire du cartel de l'essence (Ultramar ltée)","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Concurrences","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Economics; Collusion","score_opus":0.010481404522873796,"score_gpt":0.17831053550754414,"score_spread":0.16782913098467034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796751180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23910435,0.010942425,0.0073250807,0.07218056,0.0016842802,0.00017417011,0.0035731099,0.00035579287,0.6646603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62149656,0.0017255947,0.0018378892,0.0063027176,0.000096663745,0.000029660328,0.00031604088,0.00010010925,0.36809477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823606,0.0001238225,0.00003530368,0.00025429364,0.00074741634,0.00060301076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742657,0.00030559604,0.00015556175,0.00009667434,0.0014829704,0.0005326806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008372196,0.00028810115,0.00029730384,0.0015016398,0.015932193,0.00757893,0.00084511295,0.0021865976,0.017470742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00242984,0.00034393632,0.00033179382,0.002222083,0.004692647,0.001460808,0.0014086927,0.0034830302,0.0007123462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013202096,0.000029288161,0.01830004,0.0001773846,0.000047081066,0.0010658501,0.02463971,0.0005637965,0.0018418074,0.69251376,0.1964744,0.064214855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019409355,0.00001543827,0.03340811,0.00014567807,0.000027783824,0.00016354896,0.0077308565,0.0003426991,0.0008242583,0.0059193755,0.9513263,0.00007664969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9949197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99868697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10079689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10079689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12993874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73133606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W279862978","doi":"","title":"Sale of Theses on Contentville Raises Hackles in U.S. and Canada.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The chronicle of higher education","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Political science; Public administration; Library science; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.01985707607934659,"score_gpt":0.22051835665094363,"score_spread":0.20066128057159704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W279862978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016288584,0.0007836226,0.00039610695,0.01792739,0.0016778008,0.00015432005,0.0072322832,0.0009974694,0.95454234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016316243,0.00025649279,0.00012642614,0.0016167798,0.00014373158,0.000015238395,0.0007511088,0.000107692795,0.98066646],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795747,0.00010165043,0.000033758126,0.0001265824,0.0011212628,0.00065925386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946643,0.001017602,0.00020471327,0.00033186693,0.002130569,0.0016510775],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010781398,0.00044991332,0.00039862975,0.0026855296,0.011092416,0.005346508,0.001141725,0.003986613,0.34328306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059558013,0.0004457556,0.00044545508,0.0035925563,0.0019504961,0.0021908695,0.002310472,0.0029751542,0.052348915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039103365,0.000056057128,0.0016574304,0.000032194675,0.0000041697804,0.0003324271,0.0009573221,0.000045225283,0.00035199002,0.015528302,0.95828724,0.02270851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067044016,0.0000127895655,0.0062838728,0.000032157106,0.0000031208883,0.000045377732,0.00093053584,0.00009457874,0.0002872861,0.00057544105,0.9917149,0.0000133077865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6548048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90572673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011878307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027423672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93672705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799923719","doi":"","title":"LA SOUS-TRAITANCE DES SERVICES JURIDIQUES AU CANADA","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02995348016672413,"score_gpt":0.2249723464213226,"score_spread":0.19501886625459847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799923719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33416876,0.1542592,0.009638217,0.17761575,0.002730314,0.00027448672,0.004270473,0.00047585057,0.31656688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83593094,0.06259394,0.004923958,0.010808895,0.0009712956,0.000060413044,0.0010687074,0.00011290216,0.08352897],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992357,0.0010787079,0.0002349631,0.0004451071,0.0044824216,0.001401775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790693,0.0047036503,0.0016924018,0.0003929366,0.010213841,0.003927836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048016887,0.00035412476,0.00047705305,0.0028196294,0.0070598703,0.006043304,0.0017017145,0.0017828301,0.009832316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020598186,0.0003814806,0.0004105283,0.004094967,0.0031546105,0.0014262219,0.0014693666,0.003415615,0.0008198704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048288712,0.00023774512,0.06892106,0.0016577422,0.00018855944,0.0031860569,0.007198923,0.004691401,0.0025798597,0.264853,0.21696497,0.42903784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120456054,0.0001557606,0.1633318,0.0016652314,0.00013809446,0.0021029008,0.006852751,0.003216562,0.0015718614,0.006245854,0.81441104,0.00018761422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9785396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9857244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07306275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07306275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16160485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5301098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800302261","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Supreme Court holds that class action plaintiffs can obtain wiretap evidence (Imperial oil)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class action; Supreme court; Law; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Political science; Cause of action; History; Mathematics; Computer science; State (computer science); Physics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.040687068018376876,"score_gpt":0.21823281572423806,"score_spread":0.17754574770586118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800302261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016824972,0.00093494786,0.002242257,0.0413833,0.0010616508,0.00028932473,0.0030738113,0.00030956764,0.9338801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21302028,0.0016092309,0.0053918655,0.06616838,0.00053838186,0.00025572453,0.0012525927,0.00015794899,0.71160555],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98583466,0.0004734276,0.00051391154,0.0010733231,0.007946118,0.0041584857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98444206,0.0042375703,0.0004467014,0.0009965892,0.008379558,0.0014975107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049059293,0.00071784435,0.0008074575,0.0030695274,0.020380344,0.0113355685,0.0032604453,0.016269162,0.03287261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02462085,0.0014299367,0.001295327,0.0026248929,0.0060395077,0.0027926965,0.002791313,0.011458595,0.0070784967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006586286,0.00007674263,0.0035562932,0.00010413354,0.00003936397,0.0005631382,0.0017769268,0.00035563504,0.0009650762,0.48525187,0.48915038,0.018094627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009540614,0.000033143864,0.011546401,0.00030987267,0.00017509978,0.00023309427,0.0015346445,0.0010850228,0.0026643376,0.026856905,0.9552415,0.00022450773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95725375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9839842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042746246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032521576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12765688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23596168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800397568","doi":"10.7202/1044430ar","title":"Expedited Arbitration: A Study of Outcomes and Duration","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Saint Mary's University; Fanshawe College","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Dismissal; Grievance; Compulsory arbitration; Business; Legislation; Sample (material); Process (computing); Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.049742128969059364,"score_gpt":0.24307919073833756,"score_spread":0.1933370617692782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800397568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864119,0.0010717303,0.0013276717,0.00041032638,0.000024236077,0.00020950257,0.0008076285,0.000011007235,0.009725976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983234,0.00015115459,0.00024787517,0.000033209293,0.000019661711,0.00008747055,0.00038060138,0.0000110734645,0.0007456342],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98383385,0.005296786,0.0019007246,0.0012020426,0.0061258585,0.0016407723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79925925,0.11061647,0.058462318,0.005555754,0.017408254,0.0086979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025577681,0.00024176999,0.00073946617,0.0037825815,0.001788191,0.003760557,0.0016557375,0.00085792853,0.006024861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17328088,0.00021128157,0.0009151694,0.0052384045,0.002128741,0.0037632142,0.003317929,0.0017409489,0.00065768685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008345653,0.00048779702,0.9578963,0.00019956121,0.00024778803,0.00026317927,0.008048356,0.0007870205,0.00018267155,0.0051789028,0.0006990139,0.025174966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053423286,0.000619075,0.9795481,0.00015929788,0.00012896881,0.00030871897,0.008542722,0.0015251591,0.0002493249,0.0051047523,0.0037064317,0.00005402411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018715438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012908066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025577681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043786475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003522235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13526928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800532147","doi":"10.71781/1656","title":"Le principe de proportionnalité procédurale à l’aune des technologies de l’information : pour une modernisation en modération de la procédure civile","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.03505484504749379,"score_gpt":0.27758837884942084,"score_spread":0.24253353380192705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800532147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025741434,0.011400574,0.32807162,0.10799784,0.0017087611,0.00040128018,0.0003928532,0.00058774755,0.5236979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7370786,0.0110430475,0.108674906,0.02058985,0.0017214732,0.0011572147,0.00037327435,0.0006362136,0.11872549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96350753,0.0162496,0.0016431231,0.0050677727,0.011568943,0.0019629407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96110654,0.01795941,0.0030581395,0.007904586,0.00875137,0.0012199198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020986011,0.00089468766,0.000605981,0.0026427913,0.007268088,0.018137144,0.0029794688,0.00766783,0.011094769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04875922,0.0008004908,0.0011691817,0.0024143977,0.036809206,0.018186124,0.007001292,0.011650666,0.0032143784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078602725,0.000006156504,0.00020847862,0.00006126431,0.000005735899,0.000023088773,0.002052254,0.00018751349,0.00015670284,0.9890169,0.0019507004,0.0063233473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025772597,0.00007152415,0.001642588,0.00089342165,0.000039576607,0.00026230398,0.002579854,0.0016051688,0.0018952943,0.5126247,0.47827142,0.00008834252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027563373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02094599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027563373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013294313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022179559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110985935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801276660","doi":"10.3917/ride.314.0111","title":"Services juridiques à l’entreprise et création de valeur selon Gilson","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Coase theorem; Transaction cost; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.024999008968347492,"score_gpt":0.22892695904346144,"score_spread":0.20392795007511394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801276660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25259626,0.032793228,0.019927183,0.24827133,0.0011101682,0.00009374659,0.0004906993,0.00013235337,0.44458497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9066109,0.011286446,0.0038963102,0.00718398,0.0010262425,0.0001066221,0.00012602839,0.000064512744,0.06969879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947069,0.0017525798,0.0001840434,0.0006767096,0.0017344222,0.00094530714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813022,0.011779775,0.0018504389,0.00061310705,0.0028997057,0.0015547819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049289637,0.0002558893,0.0004978366,0.0029260751,0.004585294,0.008488818,0.00114879,0.0032825228,0.017172411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03005372,0.0004019007,0.00043516615,0.0032359555,0.010257787,0.0068629626,0.004356041,0.005700505,0.0014745502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003870179,0.000027338145,0.005572898,0.000071387294,0.00000904439,0.00017399843,0.0043857717,0.00044008717,0.000063254316,0.9533402,0.010053435,0.02582389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047500587,0.00008348929,0.029448554,0.00085824943,0.000050719143,0.0008039005,0.009443491,0.0026942876,0.0006666502,0.69051826,0.2652884,0.000096496995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039340712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032811865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039340712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008311194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009676224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07822341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808037235","doi":"","title":"Les dommages punitifs et la protectiondu consommateur : un commentaire del’arrêt Time inc","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Supreme court; Law; Legislature; Political science; Damages","score_opus":0.033691718436937454,"score_gpt":0.23228374339311147,"score_spread":0.198592024956174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808037235","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039679132,0.044146404,0.004247036,0.6247784,0.0074150474,0.000084721105,0.00076518377,0.00012377395,0.27876025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5147966,0.016429547,0.002278506,0.2292329,0.008178828,0.00012517843,0.00021639766,0.00013826949,0.22860384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992004,0.0018833193,0.00032419307,0.0008106164,0.0029360598,0.0020418882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875144,0.0067181354,0.00040022083,0.00039687668,0.0045240056,0.0004463741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007799064,0.0006388029,0.00089346303,0.0012547832,0.010272281,0.010028637,0.0028592166,0.018125659,0.008034742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01860032,0.00062714383,0.0010780595,0.0015527325,0.007917079,0.0035569326,0.0015221606,0.016041532,0.0009462432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098704746,0.000034617446,0.0022583562,0.00014806757,0.00004597667,0.0011022016,0.0046057487,0.000698698,0.00043219904,0.65141016,0.32865772,0.0105074765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056962857,0.000027100392,0.006084483,0.0003827602,0.0000701452,0.0003014703,0.003054721,0.0010098559,0.0005529806,0.027335212,0.96098125,0.0001429883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88804877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90379906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11195123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040608123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032930553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29463392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808551130","doi":"10.3917/ecofi.129.0177","title":"La protection du consommateur de produits financiers : quel rôle pour les recours en réparation d'un préjudice ?","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d économie financière","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.028408694898581298,"score_gpt":0.21113235261612529,"score_spread":0.18272365771754398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808551130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7021548,0.006507539,0.015849775,0.024120124,0.00039168535,0.00013318798,0.00017188613,0.00007439154,0.25059658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97191614,0.00089037133,0.0011618675,0.0011387583,0.000117596675,0.000025319052,0.000022710528,0.000014816973,0.024712432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956896,0.0014794396,0.00014967438,0.00047206963,0.0013367916,0.0008725393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855945,0.0049636886,0.005223018,0.0011843311,0.0019397937,0.00109466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045227776,0.00030776887,0.00029734182,0.0006738292,0.0025345592,0.0042115822,0.0007263657,0.002232627,0.010111958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016055003,0.00016904269,0.0003506854,0.0004940166,0.0038193497,0.0016743994,0.0017767805,0.0024727327,0.0010595012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058798183,0.00026073825,0.09798171,0.0003554694,0.0001426786,0.0017307724,0.030203205,0.0014461696,0.013151257,0.6535918,0.009435244,0.19111295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017038823,0.0011761914,0.38044333,0.0017144136,0.00033623393,0.0031403531,0.027680404,0.0044873795,0.016264612,0.20098868,0.36337745,0.00022055533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011129647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013403118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011129647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002840714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033279543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03382784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809522067","doi":"10.1515/me-2018-0005","title":"The Insight and the Legacy of <i>the Theory of Share Tenancy</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Man and the Economy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Leasehold estate; Coase theorem; Transaction cost; Property rights; Incentive; Economics; China; Law and economics; Database transaction; Property (philosophy); Neoclassical economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013932522566939842,"score_gpt":0.17591488348592696,"score_spread":0.16198236091898713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809522067","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15557246,0.025799278,0.07758973,0.3587317,0.0013912459,0.000032219632,0.00030955795,0.00018273102,0.38039103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97232914,0.004953376,0.0023169213,0.0041990154,0.00076499145,0.000013612666,0.00003128852,0.000031919484,0.01535969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868256,0.00071442104,0.00002564129,0.00014674375,0.00028042306,0.00015026996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959099,0.0026288107,0.00038397533,0.00040926522,0.00049358624,0.00017440911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026496511,0.00025125482,0.0003940777,0.0010595062,0.0017294975,0.00514437,0.00063546974,0.0019214281,0.0064956257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006052454,0.00022080353,0.00028125668,0.0016901055,0.015738145,0.0074120597,0.0016177299,0.003882228,0.00045435037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054728976,0.000004778315,0.000119621815,0.000007360418,0.0000013426259,0.000011828247,0.00015242888,0.00032166726,0.000018243825,0.99541605,0.0019432904,0.001998004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004145144,0.000004988538,0.00021014562,0.000032560456,0.0000025077104,0.0000124288335,0.0002241069,0.0014812385,0.000058936428,0.97986996,0.0180944,0.000004636553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061653885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037182572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064956257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048880284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028516527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0354653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2859687744","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2018.1490292","title":"Mystery shopping: demand-side phenomena in markets for personal plight legal services","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Negotiation; Competition (biology); Business; Contingency; Marketing; Quality (philosophy); Service (business); Tort; Competition law; Liability; Law; Economics; Market economy; Finance","score_opus":0.023119528025788455,"score_gpt":0.26051461890098276,"score_spread":0.2373950908751943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2859687744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9171174,0.0005401956,0.009712247,0.008167545,0.000040028226,0.0002112356,0.0004549814,0.0000689375,0.06368741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802303,0.000095012205,0.00047034182,0.00025264756,0.000047206155,0.000029688254,0.00006180669,0.000009348775,0.0010109136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987348,0.00047449162,0.000061009978,0.00021565138,0.0002520583,0.00026212115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97514945,0.016964318,0.004523855,0.0011328518,0.0010464772,0.0011830513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027422535,0.0002109621,0.0010431112,0.0009994559,0.0019935388,0.0051599685,0.0017474231,0.0029647818,0.024158003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016387746,0.000706813,0.0010771849,0.0011762752,0.0038828403,0.00961752,0.002464343,0.002962226,0.0007810948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024226813,0.0022890763,0.10763019,0.0004788181,0.00013515721,0.0030724788,0.009924413,0.0070659732,0.004462997,0.830475,0.00964814,0.02239512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012996139,0.00069550617,0.17946886,0.00013721213,0.00017706279,0.0015709059,0.018840514,0.12965903,0.0015126636,0.6517431,0.014563901,0.00033162933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060740896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060838796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024158003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002579049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011851821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08081657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2862020354","doi":"","title":"It is No Longer Business as Usual: An Assessment of the Canada Corruption of Public Officials Act","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Public administration; Business; Accounting; Political science","score_opus":0.028831901280215337,"score_gpt":0.23921211562127662,"score_spread":0.21038021434106127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2862020354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4362385,0.010141492,0.0006758328,0.10760405,0.00036694476,0.0004416458,0.0017276414,0.000040602576,0.44276327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729417,0.0037102553,0.00031331487,0.008868154,0.000085239764,0.00005393521,0.000386484,0.000021180209,0.013619763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9654109,0.0025933648,0.00055983744,0.0005788383,0.024404945,0.0064520803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97050315,0.005730062,0.003756247,0.0005169509,0.014878995,0.0046146195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070487037,0.00037007337,0.00041002122,0.006966615,0.014428948,0.011281812,0.0017963441,0.0028754524,0.0021632893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026634596,0.0003677676,0.00062488706,0.00971469,0.010761786,0.0023962976,0.0029558574,0.0044987365,0.0002024753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002254032,0.000333278,0.20292772,0.0005120456,0.00017062489,0.0010004477,0.054320004,0.0025450676,0.0005127309,0.5237098,0.15169096,0.062052015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051202922,0.00017078646,0.69366086,0.00080970075,0.00022716403,0.00016872287,0.100156955,0.0023396567,0.0005974562,0.009149387,0.19240044,0.00026760262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99113804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99653435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1801424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1801424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22512344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9509186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883470513","doi":"10.1287/opre.2018.1720","title":"Monotonicity of Optimal Contracts Without the First-Order Approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of Southern California","keywords":"Monotonic function; Monotone polygon; Mathematical optimization; Constraint (computer-aided design); Order (exchange); Function (biology); Simple (philosophy); Moral hazard; Mathematics; Property (philosophy); Interval (graph theory); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Incentive; Combinatorics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.09626905377919731,"score_gpt":0.3180259912671181,"score_spread":0.2217569374879208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883470513","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047934704,0.0008512651,0.8885822,0.004906374,0.00017517313,0.00028824728,0.00053446164,0.00023398809,0.056493513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7552592,0.0013570421,0.22559577,0.0015111485,0.00043252768,0.0009888711,0.00046738586,0.00025589392,0.014132186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99139965,0.0035291938,0.0006067877,0.0014429964,0.0018982369,0.0011232073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624084,0.026439482,0.0039045492,0.0027680467,0.00326814,0.0012113205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011401349,0.0014656843,0.0021801766,0.0012796267,0.0012097872,0.0035994484,0.0020893596,0.0037488954,0.011941919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055563897,0.0013527387,0.0022176893,0.00087243743,0.0044798255,0.009776737,0.0027324113,0.0074925995,0.0016624541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051516254,0.00008116828,0.0003993684,0.00020121495,0.000025616253,0.00017235118,0.00019558056,0.018701946,0.0015463207,0.9685119,0.0015871575,0.008525831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006139181,0.00009742342,0.0003680219,0.0001069134,0.000013555687,0.00021048375,0.0000642287,0.13540426,0.0010704416,0.8585126,0.004053265,0.00003735264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012270508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009554128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011941919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028632937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004835129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060296834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2888116919","doi":"10.1086/705829","title":"Optimal Law Enforcement with Ordered Leniency","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Harm; Deterrence (psychology); Outcome (game theory); Position (finance); Economics; Externality; Law enforcement; Risk dominance; Business; White-collar crime; Law and economics; Complement (music); Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Law; Political science; Game theory; Repeated game; Finance; Equilibrium selection","score_opus":0.033443607321765614,"score_gpt":0.19876148735497082,"score_spread":0.1653178800332052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2888116919","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46287093,0.0010352236,0.50362086,0.0034433387,0.00015181265,0.0008039027,0.00021280306,0.0006509973,0.027210142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969477,0.0002749253,0.024289552,0.00037283654,0.000051337945,0.00013185298,0.000049915812,0.000036437992,0.0053161946],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950808,0.0020004518,0.00030635094,0.00088252925,0.00065507373,0.0010747445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98566705,0.007965056,0.0031319424,0.0010245928,0.0011125195,0.0010987978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004497114,0.001085024,0.0018132862,0.0010915716,0.0007395215,0.0025529212,0.0014257242,0.0018455083,0.0024268378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025271174,0.0010104298,0.00044703795,0.0005954942,0.0021913992,0.0028326965,0.0017396425,0.0017773117,0.0005078202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013967026,0.0010738528,0.0074972366,0.0003917485,0.00019977085,0.00053635496,0.00046013712,0.73837745,0.007147254,0.16554578,0.0030909264,0.074282736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039079634,0.0008083585,0.0031127317,0.000088184686,0.000054014898,0.0001428741,0.00025759827,0.83317876,0.002896352,0.15635502,0.0026451088,0.00007023813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002697002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002074161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004497114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025339106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032807197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023783267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892262318","doi":"10.3386/w13899","title":"Is Protection Really for Sale? A Survey and Directions for Future Research","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Survey research; Marketing; Business; Economics; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.4588987619287438,"score_gpt":0.4610905231480394,"score_spread":0.002191761219295596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892262318","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013560692,0.6972767,0.004619414,0.1809916,0.0013593544,0.00003952645,0.00061597116,0.000034830813,0.10150178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.116785534,0.85999095,0.0017030995,0.012923277,0.0035955978,0.00002976011,0.00042353812,0.000044214485,0.0045039756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962076,0.0011989169,0.00028338147,0.0007175881,0.0011732792,0.0004192494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94547546,0.045070767,0.0027964914,0.001700247,0.0037941076,0.0011628236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009393371,0.00045682726,0.0017115902,0.004527811,0.0017830466,0.009226157,0.0017534666,0.0039251293,0.026048448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030460877,0.00041586487,0.000855365,0.010099397,0.0098174205,0.022912534,0.001618096,0.005144177,0.0022731307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012436,0.00019177828,0.012881177,0.0038493937,0.00008779257,0.00044341458,0.00079966587,0.0006723841,0.00018503628,0.5435074,0.061159816,0.3760977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024288125,0.00007661539,0.016025841,0.009392527,0.000067463865,0.0018200667,0.007205811,0.0012241721,0.00019628582,0.56455225,0.39934832,0.00006641597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067591434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005431573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026048448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059853834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043534315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08714074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892627208","doi":"10.54648/erpl2018002","title":"The Validity of Knock-for-Knock Clauses in Comparative Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Tort; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Liability; Economics; History; Art","score_opus":0.06751383544065473,"score_gpt":0.2921186497764376,"score_spread":0.22460481433578286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892627208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119169526,0.009377069,0.04300693,0.009637378,0.00031533383,0.00009822619,0.00015364421,0.00003591853,0.818206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98867875,0.0011748167,0.003750363,0.0006485276,0.00013230827,0.00006836637,0.00007581228,0.000026023914,0.005444977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97406006,0.016945496,0.0011730802,0.0018003352,0.004554577,0.00146643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9282499,0.06020885,0.003866477,0.002918008,0.004349619,0.0004071927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024086423,0.00042892483,0.0010139341,0.0046845875,0.006347908,0.012666517,0.002733113,0.0056110923,0.0070002517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041125465,0.00058100995,0.0009625555,0.0037770425,0.04037275,0.014352295,0.006307197,0.0048118937,0.00055106345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009754615,0.000006369899,0.00033795455,0.00004332907,0.0000090785425,0.00012821228,0.005130693,0.0001577977,0.000044104007,0.99245775,0.00017586304,0.0014990773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029549587,0.00006677482,0.002945236,0.0010440946,0.00008095325,0.0004863919,0.017021578,0.0013294958,0.00076948985,0.92073977,0.05544,0.00004676987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006105378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004487117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024086423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070995702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035801309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12738276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895594263","doi":"10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/anidip/a.7163","title":"Reflexiones sobre el vínculo entre reformas a la Administración de Justicia, Economía y Desarrollo Económico","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Anuario Iberoamericano Derecho Internacional Penal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022600851759669617,"score_gpt":0.27145867864643597,"score_spread":0.24885782688676636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895594263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14390926,0.0380094,0.013014093,0.28996566,0.0013858138,0.00013605342,0.00042952792,0.000119329074,0.5130308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9429655,0.01527829,0.0024829414,0.0064022867,0.0006266683,0.000099756784,0.00012311002,0.000063772226,0.031957664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99349266,0.0033505936,0.00018611542,0.0005710256,0.0013820447,0.0010176022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99134445,0.0043687383,0.0013614713,0.00084147014,0.0012947922,0.00078904943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008375933,0.00040556374,0.0006093793,0.0020921882,0.0031259686,0.012020882,0.0012003495,0.0020218645,0.012588729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013720841,0.00026606763,0.00041759494,0.0037718855,0.021740494,0.008141796,0.0060589346,0.004189654,0.00070374337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003834259,0.000025427735,0.0042520477,0.00037490748,0.00002278458,0.00016131152,0.012301169,0.0006706645,0.000236462,0.9504539,0.0085922,0.022870835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037952253,0.00006539307,0.0193036,0.0017609533,0.000040763756,0.00011708805,0.03603462,0.0009841076,0.00070750376,0.37419498,0.56669796,0.000055015673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029109597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039222006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029109597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01635548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020429421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11866784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897176398","doi":"10.7202/1052723ar","title":"L’ARRÊT JORDAN, LE MANAGEMENT DE LA JUSTICE ET LE DROIT DE LA GOUVERNANCE : DE LA CONVERSION DES DROITS EN NOMBRES À LA TRANSFORMATION DE LA CULTURE JURIDIQUE","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.005129046695038245,"score_gpt":0.18773035186462567,"score_spread":0.18260130516958742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897176398","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2798006,0.027803669,0.0037586945,0.18849076,0.0014932131,0.00012801889,0.0003288299,0.000089447734,0.49810675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69285417,0.013277075,0.0020551162,0.011853115,0.00035754958,0.00006831396,0.000111329115,0.00009895454,0.27932432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816555,0.00061454705,0.000046140503,0.00018042578,0.0005415218,0.00045179055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986941,0.00024003207,0.00018004337,0.00004380815,0.00048282492,0.000359177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021101988,0.00039480816,0.00024563397,0.0008276398,0.01263639,0.009628276,0.00092199084,0.002317944,0.011397555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002479474,0.00024927483,0.00027048407,0.0013629469,0.007848181,0.0032845514,0.0038218885,0.0043322444,0.0012575567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014523453,0.000109863424,0.020000732,0.0003084848,0.000035507856,0.0012067236,0.13523902,0.0009260476,0.0014732417,0.6554868,0.07559547,0.10947294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017677085,0.000069545145,0.024236795,0.0005824949,0.000016815551,0.00021274849,0.102511875,0.00044996393,0.0012890411,0.020926628,0.84959894,0.00008739469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4096334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6673511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4096334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024433946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04260684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8144981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899655998","doi":"10.3386/w20456","title":"The Informativeness Principle Under Limited Liability","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Business; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.3527996865974139,"score_gpt":0.45377133648895734,"score_spread":0.10097164989154345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899655998","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07736694,0.0017814334,0.70654655,0.016116284,0.00020336304,0.00025088643,0.0006543893,0.00027736745,0.19680281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.926381,0.0014268868,0.050823014,0.0033470371,0.0009712004,0.00050354877,0.00026327817,0.00010945329,0.016174583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893968,0.003823438,0.0005930322,0.0019115211,0.003264313,0.0010108157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97062576,0.02117521,0.003070861,0.002477978,0.0019461224,0.0007040878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009659331,0.0008929499,0.0012128864,0.0014515773,0.0014460043,0.0041040434,0.0015394628,0.0042552617,0.008335077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03452385,0.0010070326,0.0015566702,0.0010197024,0.008783787,0.00942827,0.0036959087,0.0067448653,0.0015560531],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021260996,0.000023122147,0.00029130053,0.000041746036,0.000018636807,0.00021579246,0.00014586607,0.0025805533,0.0005321316,0.98963356,0.0012236965,0.00527233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025991163,0.000023031154,0.0002469343,0.000027298343,0.000009865443,0.00021952845,0.0000240637,0.0048894044,0.00028367506,0.99188083,0.0023570065,0.0000123416285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008968885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060224015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009659331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021010523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022060354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05108404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899724631","doi":"10.29173/cjs29507","title":"Simon, F. C., Meta-Regulation in Practice: Beyond Normative Views of Morality and Rationality.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Normative; Morality; Sociology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.0836336861034395,"score_gpt":0.2796736255637329,"score_spread":0.19603993946029336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899724631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021408118,0.1523145,0.07810794,0.36835033,0.0032255496,0.00017069626,0.0015258585,0.0003668121,0.37453023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8404464,0.072683536,0.027421266,0.022850694,0.002739099,0.00045759007,0.00040199494,0.00026433673,0.032735158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955948,0.0019662494,0.00046377472,0.00058199343,0.0009733506,0.0004198531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98317194,0.010716645,0.0012628589,0.0010678063,0.0032368272,0.0005438914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00733708,0.0013861788,0.0009646942,0.0044650296,0.0054771597,0.007111681,0.0028899768,0.0148605285,0.008999154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021558018,0.000839556,0.0014271296,0.0041223806,0.017500512,0.01418347,0.0034778456,0.008986202,0.001990798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038698607,0.000022784736,0.00047345678,0.00012244382,0.000046150868,0.000119011886,0.001453732,0.0007141411,0.00011695501,0.9506762,0.038424198,0.0077922167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043429634,0.000013409347,0.0017101787,0.00036790545,0.00006564274,0.0001012421,0.0006127674,0.00077579013,0.00039685352,0.9332822,0.062599525,0.000031093397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032430578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03613239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032430578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009884469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00733449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07171714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901124152","doi":"10.1177/0019793918810219","title":"Does Mediation-Arbitration Reduce Arbitration Rates? Evidence from a Natural Experiment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Labor Relations Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Mediation; Natural experiment; Dispute resolution; Compulsory arbitration; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07058373431678158,"score_gpt":0.2873838567251089,"score_spread":0.21680012240832733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901124152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9633814,0.001541019,0.004882188,0.0044738306,0.0001360351,0.0009342537,0.00027100445,0.00003617175,0.024344072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946266,0.0004547341,0.0021249214,0.00074515503,0.00006315909,0.00034716038,0.0000875439,0.0000074029304,0.0015432624],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93293923,0.054754745,0.0017489856,0.0030968266,0.0051537515,0.002306501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5434148,0.3761245,0.054107238,0.017696837,0.006009671,0.0026469824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04811796,0.0004650151,0.0009491171,0.00043780662,0.0015038792,0.0020711075,0.0017761025,0.0023518284,0.008826448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18621047,0.00041352614,0.000794373,0.0007565824,0.004884337,0.001578096,0.0015131868,0.0018965112,0.00073500245],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04597791,0.059007563,0.45863613,0.005415657,0.006724815,0.0021861708,0.023501063,0.006749999,0.015417153,0.13120347,0.016691891,0.22848828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023601858,0.032105885,0.75342256,0.00069306296,0.0032250271,0.0005708548,0.009883369,0.011772497,0.012522899,0.09182951,0.060093388,0.00027914127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023734858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022912925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04811796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028534634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004770869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25447518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901491556","doi":"10.1177/0018726718796157","title":"Career stage dependent effects of law firm governance: A multilevel study of professional-client misconduct","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Relations","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"AXA Research Fund","keywords":"Misconduct; Corporate governance; Context (archaeology); Agency (philosophy); Public relations; Legal profession; Empirical research; Multilevel model; Professional conduct; Psychology; Business; Accounting; Political science; Sociology; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.06478853246564867,"score_gpt":0.27700852675716836,"score_spread":0.2122199942915197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901491556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99444926,0.000324145,0.0025948808,0.0007332702,0.00000950974,0.000044169923,0.0002800104,0.000015857662,0.0015489548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981907,0.000052795687,0.00074716716,0.000052960942,0.0000061971223,0.00002641624,0.00012296936,0.0000073105653,0.0007935668],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914262,0.005444462,0.00023254327,0.001117957,0.000491782,0.0012870233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95049113,0.026215293,0.01090026,0.005390445,0.0021632125,0.0048395586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005620676,0.00028702262,0.0008733252,0.0014439009,0.0014786848,0.0016799986,0.0018458327,0.0014795003,0.008036498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028270524,0.00040306977,0.0016714018,0.001652321,0.001535967,0.0016570196,0.0037224176,0.0020430465,0.0007645404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002451121,0.0003964488,0.98075026,0.00005157397,0.0006195931,0.00021753102,0.0036085853,0.001776052,0.0005278662,0.0034329817,0.00054708886,0.007826928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049183393,0.0005273043,0.973214,0.00009474616,0.00050089153,0.00012297554,0.0040066796,0.015801175,0.0003186581,0.003941747,0.0013940836,0.00002854525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03885178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04946598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03885178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017164472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022735372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077251256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902565154","doi":"10.29173/alr2508","title":"May You Litigate in Interesting Times: Specific Performance, Mitigation, and Valuation Issues in a Rising (or Falling) Market","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Fulbright Canada; Imperial Oil (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Valuation (finance); Cash flow; Actuarial science; Plaintiff; Economics; Market value; Context (archaeology); Liability; Cash; Net present value; Business; Microeconomics; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.049749100588851104,"score_gpt":0.2673370825313628,"score_spread":0.2175879819425117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902565154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2844521,0.023256578,0.024203664,0.18290812,0.001344164,0.00022121903,0.0001435164,0.00011949439,0.48335117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95821,0.0040969113,0.0019074797,0.011698628,0.0007214556,0.000041004387,0.000036844467,0.00002994377,0.023257757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99202734,0.0022378191,0.0003844644,0.0007757,0.0025801405,0.0019945398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851746,0.009196484,0.0016401872,0.0005523449,0.0024010355,0.0010354352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01273838,0.0003724619,0.0008560724,0.0019056203,0.0066237175,0.011220374,0.0028509954,0.012111774,0.0057570906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024100116,0.00047518482,0.000690149,0.0015044243,0.0123661775,0.009697975,0.002998835,0.009044087,0.0007150017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052856074,0.00007626504,0.00464061,0.000084990344,0.000029205909,0.0021325725,0.0031815474,0.0012794654,0.00044317933,0.93465334,0.017089533,0.0363365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075642725,0.0003248385,0.028173422,0.00084308785,0.0001780019,0.003651131,0.01538727,0.007286863,0.0014781109,0.7858013,0.15659153,0.0002087744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022837326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049310796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022837326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006249166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058290856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06736779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902621595","doi":"10.1287/isre.2018.0806","title":"Bilateral Liability-Based Contracts in Information Security Outsourcing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Systems Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Outsourcing; Business; Contract management; Service provider; Service (business); Work (physics); Outcome (game theory); Computer security; Finance; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.04463132526740047,"score_gpt":0.2745441033943281,"score_spread":0.22991277812692765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902621595","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3066264,0.0014595896,0.64691037,0.0037659544,0.000071660885,0.00024291234,0.00018927055,0.00012513946,0.040608685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714472,0.0005059436,0.022968251,0.000112849,0.000043419746,0.00011364149,0.000048721944,0.000033946224,0.0047259987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892504,0.0068678316,0.00041275285,0.00071032956,0.0014924196,0.0012662995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9666244,0.025049614,0.0036624873,0.0019125703,0.0015170204,0.0012339295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014732108,0.00072109775,0.0015252677,0.0012574891,0.0015045181,0.003068681,0.0019544957,0.0028845228,0.0087140985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04518689,0.0007085641,0.001271534,0.0020505532,0.0037447375,0.00780778,0.0031771574,0.0029519321,0.0005486769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013024044,0.00010029182,0.0021034323,0.000117020885,0.000049633898,0.00015824455,0.00041202194,0.1535207,0.00065935234,0.8253811,0.0009815261,0.016386524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011151136,0.00013160669,0.0010115271,0.0000759471,0.00005243702,0.00013783204,0.000368896,0.36244294,0.00065377314,0.63171256,0.0032627224,0.000038247097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005004027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027839048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014732108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004892149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004038383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077911735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903358943","doi":"","title":"A Spectrum of Tools to Support Litigation Risk Assessment: Promise and Limitations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of law and technology","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Toolbox; Focus (optics); Risk analysis (engineering); Risk assessment; Computer science; Management science; Knowledge management; Business; Engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.04477266246415463,"score_gpt":0.23918887597068592,"score_spread":0.1944162135065313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903358943","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058444455,0.06002882,0.57785606,0.16571483,0.0026711035,0.0036788534,0.012236157,0.010471656,0.108897984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18479079,0.015058476,0.7799069,0.009005092,0.001542434,0.0028064894,0.002521405,0.00046590684,0.003902475],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9321705,0.040879477,0.0058402033,0.0044823424,0.015127697,0.0014998225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59623045,0.27932465,0.013829211,0.029252727,0.072926044,0.008436959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09388959,0.0025362605,0.0027063321,0.02159685,0.001944321,0.012452492,0.0110978475,0.0043365783,0.009982684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16329095,0.0013162725,0.0028676945,0.009492386,0.0032151116,0.021224616,0.007761682,0.00738475,0.0055469438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040100046,0.00094798754,0.06518264,0.0019358412,0.00033506696,0.00015068498,0.0018523356,0.0067940815,0.0007713661,0.033967216,0.039087154,0.8485746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004778215,0.002541617,0.12937431,0.026593478,0.0006822729,0.0025135735,0.011997445,0.13098478,0.0040693157,0.36692494,0.32196406,0.0018763928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01476636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015340616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09388959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038141678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076663825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4965415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903399945","doi":"","title":"INEQUITY IN EQUITABLE SET-OFF: TELFORD V HOLT REVISITED","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Set (abstract data type); Supreme court; Law and economics; Plaintiff; Political science; Law; Mathematical economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.06130980770966662,"score_gpt":0.24345682233564167,"score_spread":0.18214701462597505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903399945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13051988,0.025055736,0.013015659,0.29898337,0.0017806535,0.000118541146,0.00025134443,0.00008949355,0.53018534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92916065,0.005106026,0.0015069564,0.043011054,0.0015385833,0.000063370244,0.00005325029,0.00005884183,0.019501187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99248624,0.00097615784,0.00021872864,0.001127617,0.0034134057,0.0017778113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99347454,0.0044100527,0.00044144667,0.00036408674,0.00088960293,0.00042029115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006303265,0.000217516,0.0006888218,0.0018133586,0.006261723,0.008491893,0.002742565,0.01077354,0.005285792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01653065,0.00037337234,0.0007317237,0.0017359374,0.020608352,0.008228919,0.0030635041,0.014558924,0.0003172392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009069905,0.0000066428006,0.00042137844,0.000021702857,0.000004384698,0.0002774151,0.00089969503,0.000116039984,0.000035352485,0.98353666,0.0070295716,0.0076420233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045025725,0.000029766603,0.0042731017,0.0004916108,0.000044583227,0.00072314776,0.0021028912,0.0013268853,0.00037538316,0.86075383,0.12974587,0.00008790942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2770256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37957942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7229744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027031919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020602766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5508263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904986219","doi":"10.4324/9781315572499-7","title":"Mistake and Strict Liability","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Liability; Law and economics; Business; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03726889606310534,"score_gpt":0.19352828049856147,"score_spread":0.15625938443545612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904986219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015848354,0.023312774,0.011757167,0.010898851,0.0010439603,0.000040225386,0.00006264912,0.00004814431,0.9369879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6681791,0.01556338,0.0033249278,0.00949164,0.001869571,0.0001256188,0.00008649435,0.00007456741,0.3012847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973085,0.00050534547,0.0001644666,0.00031674028,0.0012768346,0.00042809406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982381,0.0008707915,0.00020010381,0.00027358174,0.0002937386,0.00012364515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014929147,0.00043538955,0.00036489448,0.0010736173,0.0030335896,0.0035802072,0.0009780104,0.0031911237,0.007468395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044175307,0.00028040394,0.0003913424,0.00085915637,0.012497577,0.004615869,0.0037768392,0.00400904,0.0018277116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022953413,0.000004559554,0.00010402089,0.000016185337,0.0000010606451,0.00007584348,0.0006618367,0.00013908719,0.000039437626,0.9892292,0.004326578,0.0053999745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033479498,0.000021444102,0.0006299098,0.00024587158,0.0000049059436,0.00036442268,0.0004201169,0.00038667623,0.00013510967,0.8432338,0.15454222,0.000012171497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005803115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005085248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007468395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028525952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027456954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0249843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906238219","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/uc9qr","title":"Chapter 1: Reasonable Royalties","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Normative; Value (mathematics); State (computer science); Economics; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Law; Business; Political science; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.03314784125721599,"score_gpt":0.20372927280718298,"score_spread":0.170581431549967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906238219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037917853,0.028201722,0.14729397,0.020871619,0.0034354092,0.00038145247,0.0015385362,0.00045881676,0.79402655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3630935,0.0725619,0.17468384,0.022859693,0.014459167,0.002181649,0.0029657723,0.001934301,0.34526017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985024,0.004208066,0.0007800131,0.0014197435,0.008010093,0.0005580899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98527294,0.0102462275,0.000805499,0.0013385245,0.0021494739,0.00018730601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008168358,0.001287566,0.0010471451,0.0035786696,0.0031963352,0.011877663,0.0032426529,0.0048224367,0.04026754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044163916,0.0010103788,0.0013371297,0.0031071173,0.007495671,0.011961198,0.002858647,0.009857239,0.013783499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008038837,0.000013764147,0.00016354944,0.00014343817,0.000005112258,0.000039977014,0.00018449221,0.0007485036,0.000078956815,0.94549793,0.036501925,0.01661424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005231051,0.000037594666,0.0007101892,0.0013780848,0.000013955324,0.00031154402,0.0001871864,0.0016320781,0.00040267297,0.67846763,0.31681338,0.000040337534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043335548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030706907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04026754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004615676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047263457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13470829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906568424","doi":"","title":"Prosecutors and Justice: Insights from Comparative Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Political science; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.021534048324927595,"score_gpt":0.23676090117518409,"score_spread":0.2152268528502565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906568424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.380047,0.031744886,0.008673077,0.015547243,0.000096244585,0.000041520598,0.00039194658,0.000030716645,0.5634274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904929,0.0046484685,0.0009487502,0.00034177685,0.000061168255,0.00002206615,0.00012242014,0.000015332851,0.0033471305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99250096,0.004882079,0.00014815971,0.0003764903,0.0013578368,0.0007345816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766307,0.018416984,0.0014392859,0.00067936693,0.0023980152,0.0004356199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006231876,0.00017418987,0.0006442085,0.006470438,0.003632214,0.0052187936,0.0012403362,0.0015820717,0.01079662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026359845,0.00015377281,0.00034913924,0.009780536,0.0061428994,0.005975405,0.0024407138,0.00136582,0.00037905885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006510406,0.00005986067,0.011818598,0.00014366732,0.00004839388,0.00023808308,0.011651679,0.001069337,0.000052757987,0.94497234,0.0037174756,0.026162893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010957925,0.0001936517,0.10200029,0.0014321032,0.00020060076,0.0006837732,0.06391339,0.005161118,0.00035361937,0.63628197,0.18960077,0.00006910008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03141755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043796226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03141755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007781931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029794131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062469363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907109613","doi":"10.1162/daed_a_00533","title":"More Markets, More Justice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Daedalus","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Business; Function (biology); Competition (biology); Principal (computer security); Competition law; Quality (philosophy); Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Market economy; Computer security","score_opus":0.021253770724784418,"score_gpt":0.21933628563215246,"score_spread":0.19808251490736806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907109613","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018196078,0.011903914,0.011864331,0.24862711,0.0025633702,0.000055271088,0.0004242676,0.00025549,0.7061101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7078308,0.012209241,0.010768711,0.066913575,0.005157798,0.0001994234,0.00043833963,0.00035642963,0.19612572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995093,0.0017353245,0.00016162383,0.00081556325,0.0014867511,0.00070787396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99233454,0.0023213886,0.0011505831,0.0013052351,0.0011986167,0.0016896371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042441376,0.00047251803,0.0006940891,0.0015939379,0.004410618,0.014613657,0.0011172269,0.0050193467,0.07208091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01162776,0.00030449743,0.00046499958,0.0016883662,0.013798889,0.024950435,0.0069060647,0.005203742,0.005653533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011636464,0.0000590967,0.00070252264,0.00011056206,0.000012523526,0.00008687862,0.0011357106,0.00015782387,0.0001150157,0.9228298,0.052057452,0.022720877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019750129,0.000020859019,0.0014097703,0.00018449886,0.000008483924,0.0002150215,0.0022719528,0.00016797025,0.000094407704,0.49744037,0.49815226,0.0000147019155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004591793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061342684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07208091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044993493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055432497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24113464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908908358","doi":"10.29173/alr1427","title":"The New Federal Judicial Appointments Process: The First Ten Years","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Economic Justice; Law; Process (computing); Political science; Public administration; Computer science","score_opus":0.018782186454154748,"score_gpt":0.2272685723713267,"score_spread":0.20848638591717195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908908358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049297925,0.0928796,0.01905013,0.1884563,0.018029243,0.0009897766,0.003398051,0.00083950756,0.62705946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47145027,0.040033072,0.020722691,0.033547334,0.007928804,0.00087304506,0.002683733,0.0005345255,0.42222652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97194517,0.0065935594,0.0017977871,0.0019976262,0.012829889,0.0048360764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793423,0.006644652,0.0017966356,0.0017427978,0.0057413904,0.004732365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028241158,0.00038317012,0.00056071155,0.004035758,0.0075087617,0.013610249,0.00248252,0.004383175,0.015044678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04822436,0.0012598676,0.00045225507,0.0049127126,0.0033110203,0.006081161,0.005010346,0.006885528,0.0052361237],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008044445,0.00015604976,0.0034661756,0.00023125339,0.000009618134,0.00023862865,0.0050386,0.00034482265,0.00030608516,0.36807546,0.3062176,0.3158353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012673349,0.00003257709,0.0074734376,0.00028714698,0.0000039928345,0.0000640563,0.00076079305,0.00021199763,0.00011287147,0.008488932,0.9825233,0.000028205544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10123138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21614365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8987686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028063029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2036125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909991345","doi":"10.4324/9780429461231-8","title":"Developing supply chain liability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Product liability; Liability; Strict liability; Business; Parallels; Legal liability; Delict; Supply chain; Joint and several liability; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Private law; Political science; Comparative law; Finance; Operations management","score_opus":0.04341738506952473,"score_gpt":0.20911950782213637,"score_spread":0.16570212275261165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909991345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006097274,0.011708808,0.14642487,0.015259613,0.00079167716,0.00016491434,0.00006527749,0.0001492152,0.8193383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3211944,0.06850718,0.14177951,0.008082345,0.0016509185,0.00053573103,0.00043948102,0.00039268399,0.45741776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799865,0.0005418817,0.00012745983,0.00028030615,0.00088130904,0.00017036892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986203,0.00059983874,0.00012889084,0.0001597264,0.00038704235,0.00010424031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026543404,0.0004999047,0.0002694519,0.0018655359,0.0023783161,0.0051662847,0.0012805144,0.0029830206,0.017590063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040219207,0.00045114008,0.00046062874,0.001632513,0.0056102998,0.009454233,0.0049039233,0.0038633563,0.0034912939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.123476e-7,0.000005526075,0.00004971002,0.00002299468,5.166367e-7,0.000040560837,0.0002987657,0.000474867,0.000047935402,0.9863456,0.0024224732,0.010290593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002222615,0.000015757929,0.00013250824,0.00036211868,0.0000025064717,0.00021387733,0.00053637667,0.001496366,0.00047830032,0.53849304,0.458258,0.000008897169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024430833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026879162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017590063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005548583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00568667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058844686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912800553","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Competition Authority and the Public Prosecution Service jointly launch revised immunity and leniency programs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Service (business); Public service; Business; Political science; Public administration; Aeronautics; Law; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.026131016281962207,"score_gpt":0.20521270131283909,"score_spread":0.17908168503087687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912800553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035009637,0.0012232244,0.008728483,0.098681115,0.007563262,0.0071995878,0.0074562114,0.0068842703,0.8272542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09088558,0.00067858753,0.012814806,0.029406276,0.0010854226,0.0010707105,0.0038218615,0.00089170487,0.8593451],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9693927,0.0013596703,0.0007752208,0.0009053216,0.02116319,0.0064038695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90997064,0.012618319,0.0019385148,0.003196043,0.057129685,0.015146813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016663,0.0012080749,0.0012033684,0.010139941,0.010430419,0.012523502,0.00508986,0.013318405,0.048902646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049298633,0.0019351137,0.0018319826,0.0034989964,0.0050151716,0.002634974,0.0031889735,0.010382561,0.011053572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008908574,0.0005258132,0.004644097,0.000093654795,0.000037910686,0.00015758818,0.00054508226,0.0008160016,0.0012339577,0.050608765,0.9000445,0.041203674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021727869,0.00016840847,0.03614339,0.00007519384,0.000067792964,0.00007541374,0.0006221154,0.0020424852,0.0013944122,0.0021394878,0.95685333,0.00020063858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9353421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9662851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06465793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054607254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29378098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39620525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913631786","doi":"10.1111/bjir.12456","title":"Interest Arbitration and the Narcotic Effect: Evidence from Three Decades of Collective Bargaining in Ontario","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Industrial Relations","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Collective bargaining; Economics; Compulsory arbitration; Narcotic; Robustness (evolution); Probit model; Probit; Labour economics; Econometrics; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.06971684850243406,"score_gpt":0.22828030272937336,"score_spread":0.1585634542269393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913631786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99122757,0.00059794675,0.00012465629,0.0006588989,0.0000061374467,0.000014538236,0.00046761197,0.0000028819948,0.006899807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973947,0.00028568567,0.000048948805,0.000055379372,0.0000070333954,0.000006371607,0.0002115943,0.000003421516,0.0019869523],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792224,0.0002099758,0.00011036723,0.00024287729,0.0009741876,0.0005403015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97546446,0.0053078462,0.011070422,0.0013113889,0.004885839,0.0019601656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026972382,0.0001348492,0.00042673983,0.0017399291,0.0031985557,0.0015640307,0.0010017081,0.00065891026,0.0043407865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012146312,0.0003293935,0.0003303769,0.004906856,0.0024859335,0.0007893471,0.001380646,0.0007121979,0.00024361999],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021021144,0.000087380984,0.95166767,0.000119646436,0.00012059276,0.00033791322,0.025998827,0.00040520707,0.0008116795,0.0020405478,0.0017592893,0.01644091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062665104,0.000019714267,0.9894706,0.000035340254,0.000019554582,0.000022825154,0.005765028,0.0001666889,0.00009357197,0.00011701026,0.004273866,0.000009610716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9605016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9819464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03949839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02195114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014544345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15926743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921033060","doi":"10.1145/3295750.3298945","title":"Variations in Assessor Agreement in Due Diligence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cisco Systems (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Due diligence; Diligence; Agreement; Variety (cybernetics); Database transaction; Business; Accounting; Law; Computer science; Actuarial science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology; Database","score_opus":0.029245359367364453,"score_gpt":0.2230913289925534,"score_spread":0.19384596962518896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921033060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97554135,0.00066436,0.0079279775,0.00083278416,0.00003694888,0.00023825513,0.00020518397,0.00009432375,0.014458831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799,0.0000670234,0.0010314054,0.00008100394,0.000015024346,0.00004515571,0.00006613771,0.00001248078,0.00069178466],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.86581606,0.08966018,0.009147438,0.009655329,0.021084914,0.0046359524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39594805,0.4858287,0.06713616,0.023161579,0.023703558,0.004221946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09272851,0.000230376,0.00067130406,0.003972053,0.001849482,0.0037104154,0.0014163832,0.0014205214,0.0061919424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42886484,0.0004681212,0.00046772423,0.0029313802,0.0018889199,0.003148995,0.0035910169,0.0016172935,0.0009924141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013871411,0.0005024982,0.7956902,0.00041888215,0.0005732556,0.00089749775,0.05676806,0.0051279236,0.0075214035,0.006761172,0.0040036906,0.12034845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012457302,0.0007200618,0.9485933,0.00020414694,0.00008886393,0.0006797264,0.01680697,0.0072529116,0.0031985263,0.0076140347,0.014555877,0.00016087512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043309224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042347414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09272851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028953159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001404227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4904011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2924210987","doi":"10.71781/2508","title":"La médiation obligatoire en droit civil comme outil pour favoriser l'accès à la justice","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0581548951386698,"score_gpt":0.2930866653889144,"score_spread":0.23493177025024461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2924210987","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041557685,0.0042231507,0.037990198,0.059567407,0.0006819562,0.00012670436,0.00008838897,0.00011420137,0.85565037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9050732,0.0025561368,0.005418894,0.005905812,0.00022712298,0.0001505231,0.00004692735,0.00012496526,0.080496356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98823893,0.006544218,0.00029035733,0.001241084,0.002071279,0.0016140711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934822,0.0024225854,0.0008293672,0.0011520279,0.0011267319,0.0009870484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070018987,0.00059405377,0.0004915159,0.0011641341,0.009500527,0.013569801,0.001770368,0.0052696886,0.020272361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011266562,0.00039309956,0.00082560873,0.0011221305,0.03743458,0.011899745,0.009040356,0.008138327,0.002736665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073359865,0.000014120512,0.00032301608,0.000045854027,0.0000066225325,0.00006716192,0.0120315915,0.00008405463,0.00013247832,0.98157805,0.002072524,0.003637173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032451946,0.000060634695,0.0027931398,0.0010941917,0.00003814621,0.00040305706,0.042977072,0.00072942587,0.0008431274,0.53385115,0.41709557,0.00008208875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023742381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033960003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023742381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0095998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01743671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06965178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2924905487","doi":"","title":"Contracts: Cases and Commentaries, 10th ed.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.035656072715857176,"score_gpt":0.2165955747406004,"score_spread":0.18093950202474324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2924905487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010806328,0.14454868,0.0031111126,0.034598865,0.014048176,0.00019718948,0.0039715515,0.0005330291,0.7979107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018538268,0.10911105,0.0040862355,0.015039576,0.005475744,0.00033910654,0.0040747114,0.0004341014,0.84290123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965887,0.00046696584,0.00016879592,0.00018380622,0.002242751,0.000348925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962999,0.001533869,0.00026115417,0.00022638954,0.0014674646,0.0002112337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025901452,0.00084744464,0.00073017343,0.0032371078,0.0043122424,0.006214165,0.001910827,0.0034595632,0.06476977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009631379,0.0007724881,0.00062034366,0.005602915,0.0029449838,0.0043017603,0.0018453854,0.0036174206,0.02484152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042188612,0.000005870674,0.000043539425,0.000059015005,9.2811405e-7,0.000028108943,0.0001726978,0.00006801265,0.00002746804,0.023910519,0.9594269,0.016252724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019062595,0.0000017125449,0.0002067444,0.00018838643,9.275264e-7,0.000030187795,0.00016377539,0.000043089047,0.000019190707,0.0035137583,0.9958247,0.0000055432615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15955801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22551301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15955801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010513379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015918301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31725854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2938821826","doi":"","title":"Suspended Sentences and Service Labor in Israel – From Alternatives to Imprisonment to Net Widening","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Contemporary Problems","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Prison; Sanctions; Unintended consequences; Sentence; Population; Order (exchange); Service (business); Prison population; Political science; Criminology; Economics; Business; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Economy; Finance","score_opus":0.03395538364676883,"score_gpt":0.2136553017244314,"score_spread":0.17969991807766256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2938821826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83931905,0.0017443389,0.00048512098,0.02092125,0.00011707046,0.000017044855,0.00012447227,0.000006510501,0.13726503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947817,0.00023065241,0.000032913587,0.0007153061,0.00004537027,0.0000062901686,0.00002657697,0.0000028490108,0.0041582338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831796,0.0004783264,0.000042306037,0.00007233241,0.00017767397,0.0009114591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983541,0.00062753446,0.00033557336,0.00004737798,0.0002271308,0.00040830864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016729151,0.00011064472,0.00020921556,0.00087351666,0.0034456193,0.0035463045,0.0008969197,0.002208642,0.009857314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044115414,0.000116626274,0.00016827078,0.00087407656,0.0060144183,0.0019517767,0.002155614,0.0023322327,0.00037160836],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004887863,0.0004154299,0.06937801,0.00008376882,0.000031690768,0.001625527,0.03332043,0.00086290104,0.00044541058,0.841125,0.014735385,0.03748762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022011933,0.00038832758,0.24951892,0.0006850667,0.0000713404,0.0007051629,0.29614827,0.0032876823,0.0010644889,0.31909758,0.12871066,0.00010234597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049327537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12036289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049327537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061000967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004481878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09808087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942633122","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2019.3292","title":"Relational Adaptation Under Reel Authority","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptation (eye); Revenue; Business; Microeconomics; Discretion; Reel; Industrial organization; Computer science; Economics; Advertising; Finance; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.062236690456401046,"score_gpt":0.22577281698670204,"score_spread":0.163536126530301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942633122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75822073,0.00036244525,0.11920879,0.0039122156,0.000036901303,0.00018097201,0.00018159128,0.00016234454,0.11773395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933357,0.00007252872,0.0023128674,0.000119559685,0.000025290072,0.00003450962,0.000019672103,0.000011741868,0.00406806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99289364,0.0038329973,0.00020577763,0.0010923323,0.0008562828,0.0011189051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766,0.011071414,0.005978387,0.0030730048,0.001264459,0.0020128337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075394944,0.0004305019,0.00072911655,0.0006920198,0.001450365,0.0033954233,0.0012559934,0.0017996825,0.012485942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03624014,0.00029107742,0.00066043145,0.0007494082,0.004342143,0.0055999747,0.0037063248,0.0024330958,0.0010061743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003180047,0.0002797047,0.011877263,0.00006544657,0.000068942325,0.0011101004,0.0027095887,0.05971988,0.0022696534,0.89700735,0.0014032971,0.023170784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021193684,0.0002135386,0.007553757,0.000025686666,0.00004366092,0.00039785143,0.0022919301,0.20953175,0.00081327494,0.77228016,0.0065695094,0.00006700592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00472836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021261526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012485942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022041877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001221922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041769683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942789270","doi":"10.7202/1058512ar","title":"Pour l’injonction mandatoire comme recours d’exécution en nature : quelques réflexions d’un praticien","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Obligation; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.015193860338073458,"score_gpt":0.22242166304413108,"score_spread":0.20722780270605762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942789270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069821075,0.010930962,0.031643353,0.24795115,0.0015365577,0.0001002904,0.00021390633,0.00009731043,0.63770545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8278189,0.003928291,0.0057154065,0.020406896,0.00044497242,0.00010971806,0.000048998623,0.0001443082,0.14138259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939612,0.0022091332,0.00014446731,0.0011844761,0.0015345745,0.0009661499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99340034,0.0029336696,0.0004427411,0.0006512588,0.00199647,0.0005754951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064325505,0.000558316,0.0005387556,0.0011631071,0.015669635,0.010600029,0.002530891,0.007921672,0.012011922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010391276,0.00045612172,0.00058005715,0.0013667353,0.043771166,0.009105313,0.0041235574,0.0121498825,0.0007801377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000111288855,0.000008469738,0.0004634377,0.000042056934,0.0000073253136,0.00014803375,0.023060754,0.00016521165,0.00020313376,0.96600103,0.0054106773,0.0044786264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023382561,0.000045891513,0.004888587,0.00090619776,0.00004042241,0.00031657473,0.059470404,0.0013208716,0.0012490123,0.37304756,0.5585496,0.00014147935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5391824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7134255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5391824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03256325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03265186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92706287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943412088","doi":"10.7202/1058485ar","title":"Le vol d’information dans la société canadienne","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008412045865047476,"score_gpt":0.17893602342251277,"score_spread":0.1705239775574653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943412088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02421232,0.015083066,0.008973866,0.052448183,0.0006971,0.00004712372,0.00021123316,0.00006442788,0.8982626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83019125,0.009474916,0.0027060325,0.009163299,0.0006846334,0.00010514794,0.0001323601,0.000060465638,0.14748186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900249,0.0029376661,0.00032355555,0.0010341038,0.0040612677,0.0016183303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934778,0.0030440942,0.00052606064,0.0005589975,0.0018388535,0.00055405125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004892925,0.00046555887,0.00054662494,0.004180469,0.008982703,0.015781444,0.0014037591,0.0061037987,0.0074124485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008546108,0.0004537998,0.0005141199,0.004855357,0.0299994,0.0050291438,0.003941539,0.0054867184,0.0010233871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025787049,0.0000022252375,0.00018400022,0.00001195118,0.0000017170559,0.000026887361,0.0017531684,0.00010339684,0.000017626151,0.9927642,0.0024577565,0.002674609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009322191,0.00002212373,0.0038868294,0.00032645607,0.00001821715,0.00014229475,0.0042450265,0.0004991785,0.00021142614,0.29545495,0.69512886,0.000055261582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36630446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33977568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63369554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029744683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024764683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7283447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943735594","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Competition Authority and the Public Prosecution Service revise immunity and leniency programs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Public service; Business; Service (business); Public administration; Public relations; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.025182013204818252,"score_gpt":0.20613966821141086,"score_spread":0.1809576550065926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943735594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032404214,0.002919024,0.005225779,0.47727695,0.008957475,0.001222994,0.0023913954,0.0017925779,0.46780962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20408833,0.0021021552,0.007860539,0.20692518,0.0029170413,0.000399435,0.0015650447,0.0005465646,0.5735957],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9628345,0.002081093,0.00085725484,0.0014538815,0.022107894,0.010665332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9200721,0.013803541,0.0017714008,0.0026630375,0.047131363,0.014558576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01849597,0.0009130186,0.0009991599,0.005411143,0.015245607,0.014300138,0.005251448,0.016847078,0.03736941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063625984,0.0013321406,0.0014279513,0.0026842554,0.0055857124,0.0041904296,0.003288222,0.015192266,0.0056990804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000669438,0.00025387775,0.0038667896,0.000052780844,0.000020216658,0.00011293994,0.0005653965,0.0006962751,0.00046679677,0.07297329,0.8884225,0.032502018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019469604,0.00012164611,0.029277053,0.00017135801,0.0000798446,0.00007734,0.0011100594,0.0025889801,0.0010501557,0.0074409265,0.9577078,0.00018008535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95423985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9790019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09628218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09628218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3521243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6985793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944197361","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3385735","title":"Corporate Law and the Myth of Efficient Market Control","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ontario Museum; Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Market for corporate control; Control (management); Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Political science; Corporate governance; Philosophy; Finance; Management; Theology; Shareholder","score_opus":0.008292673402234486,"score_gpt":0.17128702238418544,"score_spread":0.16299434898195095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944197361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08294409,0.011856021,0.25454962,0.26155674,0.0017398343,0.00014377308,0.00041755964,0.00024258433,0.38654974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682797,0.001684647,0.008952799,0.0063014906,0.0019515151,0.00015200263,0.00005054575,0.00006727133,0.0125599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99302953,0.0028567512,0.00027892433,0.0014708915,0.0015766454,0.0007872229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97945625,0.013992953,0.0014651732,0.0030973763,0.0014835319,0.0005045949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013704571,0.00044680978,0.0009560283,0.0016637533,0.0020393566,0.00985904,0.0015990768,0.00582945,0.005114656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02633878,0.0004817682,0.0007781501,0.0007408674,0.027361834,0.008245061,0.0021175877,0.007914312,0.00066253036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045695065,0.000005748283,0.000060523165,0.000005379683,0.000004722843,0.0000047890753,0.000045227847,0.00043978603,0.000019601848,0.99782526,0.00062236685,0.00096216804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008937687,0.0000037014868,0.000067582434,0.0000077072955,0.0000017618257,0.000004861167,0.0000130253575,0.0008364818,0.000033524848,0.9970489,0.0019704313,0.0000031545876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030026839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013097217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013704571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045916904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036067513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07247758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947363274","doi":"10.7202/1059451ar","title":"UNE PHILOSOPHIE NOUVELLE DES CONTRATS FONDÉE SUR L’IDÉE DE JUSTICE CONTRACTUELLE","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022163967742959166,"score_gpt":0.2088653168280577,"score_spread":0.18670134908509853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947363274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029542398,0.02033385,0.07203571,0.11704526,0.0016236624,0.00007160846,0.00014934738,0.00006668808,0.75913143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74385977,0.0117397895,0.015692208,0.025118317,0.0015171358,0.00014790974,0.00009852988,0.00015324967,0.20167308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943926,0.0019383843,0.0001228317,0.0007955021,0.0020428656,0.0007079973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956117,0.0022747412,0.00030900002,0.00045415014,0.0011000491,0.00025021794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004710259,0.00053498574,0.00047614513,0.0013490123,0.0073762015,0.009836611,0.0012434437,0.0063222353,0.008808107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067128586,0.00032418265,0.0006346896,0.0016219527,0.025756042,0.006988127,0.0027283228,0.008743363,0.0009432439],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015225918,0.0000018727359,0.00006371585,0.0000071012573,0.0000013225064,0.000015136034,0.00072892057,0.00006174803,0.000040500912,0.99633163,0.0015794524,0.001167069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012774514,0.000014631449,0.0010273723,0.00024082739,0.000010975088,0.00016766379,0.002010343,0.0007335948,0.00038081087,0.6759324,0.31943598,0.000032566124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12042927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15023871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12042927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015852815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014921153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2394566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947536169","doi":"","title":"L’accès à la justice à l’épreuve de l’industrie judiciaire","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archipelago (University of Quebec in Montreal)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bureau of Justice Assistance; Université de Montréal; Fordham University; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03873251914093412,"score_gpt":0.22057836362329003,"score_spread":0.1818458444823559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947536169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19934364,0.022854026,0.0108475685,0.16614123,0.0024788429,0.0001147811,0.0014876596,0.00035090305,0.5963814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8446855,0.0032031592,0.0032664712,0.0056500444,0.000570388,0.000048278307,0.0003933197,0.000089116205,0.14209366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895649,0.0025057963,0.00039129963,0.00092993677,0.0038885348,0.0027195804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99002916,0.003135987,0.00052921346,0.00081117556,0.004268334,0.0012261802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005686204,0.00054323557,0.0005214563,0.002795464,0.009945053,0.013935287,0.0018249212,0.0065958397,0.026710311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022947993,0.00068669376,0.00054643035,0.0023513741,0.0042286688,0.0042247456,0.0018606182,0.008335503,0.00201439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016784553,0.00015489575,0.01637124,0.00012539318,0.00010034201,0.0009067052,0.0041865017,0.0023437808,0.0012971861,0.8008514,0.09732158,0.07617314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013377148,0.00008674412,0.09371542,0.00053334405,0.000059597325,0.0007626697,0.005471893,0.0050638095,0.0020191544,0.061122805,0.8308058,0.0002250645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8865501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88235694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8865501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04969687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06077912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3605777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947593671","doi":"10.7202/1059503ar","title":"LES GARANTIES LÉGALES RELATIVES À LA QUALITÉ D’UN PRODUIT SELON LA NOUVELLE LOI DE LA PROTECTION DU CONSOMMATEUR","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017234020859286252,"score_gpt":0.2086126162140975,"score_spread":0.19137859535481125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947593671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59726775,0.0061645415,0.027665578,0.014260175,0.0003383493,0.00016475731,0.00071986305,0.000161349,0.35325763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.939662,0.0012706078,0.004827748,0.0007062255,0.00010577483,0.000075835604,0.00029472096,0.000068698886,0.05298839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864073,0.0021216373,0.0007124069,0.001423548,0.0077283457,0.0016068905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9652322,0.013683565,0.009017095,0.0027382402,0.00838146,0.0009475658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006847428,0.0003694047,0.00041032032,0.0025407486,0.0034523653,0.009853517,0.001459631,0.0027630986,0.015720766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035981245,0.0005059285,0.00069273013,0.0020244373,0.0057338797,0.005247808,0.0028834834,0.0033208495,0.0015392466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016582242,0.00018420277,0.08101671,0.0004130054,0.000107444626,0.0011953489,0.015602917,0.0034664385,0.005515103,0.8050157,0.007325641,0.07999176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008113144,0.0008467307,0.3905246,0.0018958797,0.00032080183,0.0022457591,0.023408491,0.006853037,0.020306282,0.19789062,0.35521615,0.0004105427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03285893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042839065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03285893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009420044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067026634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068347454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948462574","doi":"","title":"LES PRESOMPTIONS LEGALES DE FAUTE ET DE RESPONSABILITE S’APPLIQUENT-ELLES AU CONTRAT?","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislator; Law; Legal liability; Political science; Law and economics; Liability; Sociology; Legislation","score_opus":0.05257216943246001,"score_gpt":0.2850644319208132,"score_spread":0.2324922624883532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948462574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049862724,0.022098772,0.016165286,0.16655116,0.0013233366,0.000070569506,0.0004815213,0.00011130935,0.74333525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8307738,0.011647629,0.006539426,0.015330092,0.0009933888,0.00010289008,0.00023455727,0.000112529044,0.13426575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98810005,0.0032089464,0.0003988317,0.0010631953,0.0047572237,0.0024717273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98575103,0.0040895604,0.0009589763,0.0015931487,0.006928305,0.00067897816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009245479,0.00062318664,0.0009821207,0.0024700759,0.006082836,0.01372436,0.0025461728,0.0059783575,0.0138014965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02496664,0.0007276693,0.0006742294,0.0028934127,0.020917285,0.008607764,0.0015912357,0.00676978,0.0027381529],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000146870025,0.000018957842,0.0011994638,0.000046574176,0.000018291383,0.0001061268,0.001045464,0.00024771653,0.00019062459,0.9731521,0.008417247,0.015542806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050957973,0.00003199628,0.016404502,0.0007396928,0.000055237655,0.00042421566,0.0039377077,0.0016157588,0.0007757102,0.47292435,0.5029111,0.0001287603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7341409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7532973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7341409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03507456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041419335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53484964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949805533","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_245-1","title":"Crime (Incentive to)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Apprehension; Conviction; Incentive; Criminology; Criminal Conviction; Stochastic game; Deterrence (psychology); Economics; Political science; Actuarial science; Law; Psychology; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0375694247016602,"score_gpt":0.2073523203130932,"score_spread":0.169782895611433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949805533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013121833,0.00037440023,0.009109278,0.010523296,0.00034294455,0.0001703079,0.00031555412,0.000092572205,0.96594983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6102305,0.0009344934,0.0050687306,0.0056534754,0.0007143667,0.000335342,0.00026426124,0.00007158661,0.37672725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996018,0.00088972255,0.00016100158,0.0007195926,0.0013462639,0.0008655084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996985,0.0007947724,0.00054423686,0.0006863252,0.00055194605,0.00043770863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026575297,0.00042474977,0.00056074123,0.0012190789,0.0015737091,0.0044896393,0.0012716879,0.0042438577,0.052116964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01040307,0.00038639148,0.00044456596,0.0007192766,0.003985411,0.002784041,0.0030088811,0.0033846293,0.0051401546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007892261,0.000041391595,0.0006340272,0.000023738634,0.0000051195725,0.00002185744,0.000084025865,0.00020035845,0.00007451183,0.97865456,0.00976682,0.010485739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047455545,0.00008316406,0.0055614524,0.0002311587,0.000023940787,0.0004150038,0.00033593932,0.0022210395,0.0006434942,0.68176,0.3086508,0.00002648955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029709535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005135641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052116964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021496324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004869314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1743486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950861516","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3083556","title":"On the Genesis of Interfirm Relational Contracts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.029159980182170652,"score_gpt":0.21893306899611717,"score_spread":0.18977308881394653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950861516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2791286,0.0030610955,0.089592904,0.03492069,0.00022782564,0.000099478355,0.00023216316,0.00013131894,0.5926059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878505,0.00053046155,0.0033754236,0.00039696746,0.00014385891,0.000026740225,0.000024725196,0.000025296093,0.007626043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827516,0.0008239006,0.00006230546,0.00027860995,0.00028852865,0.0002714084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98933595,0.0072409655,0.0008650889,0.001231102,0.000834345,0.00049268745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004112862,0.00020384288,0.00042923857,0.0010370322,0.0031529584,0.006917983,0.0014749743,0.0049657635,0.017432982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018113796,0.0004650335,0.00037902652,0.00089815794,0.010805939,0.008883354,0.0025590262,0.0038102723,0.0009733234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022649897,0.0000034841555,0.0001301523,0.000002114503,5.438568e-7,0.000018823855,0.0001726092,0.00010666902,0.000017220367,0.9985856,0.00021324679,0.00074732344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006988374,0.000004654489,0.000428396,0.000016519529,0.0000021805124,0.000044001274,0.00023412255,0.0017993888,0.000045630633,0.99411327,0.003299902,0.000005075958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031116505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00216945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017432982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028204448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019630792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05831915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951824380","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v8n4p13","title":"Economic Analysis of Optimal Sample Size in Legal Proceedings","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sample size determination; Sample (material); Stochastic game; Population size; Econometrics; Statistics; Population; Point estimation; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01618967921628035,"score_gpt":0.23910457586220266,"score_spread":0.22291489664592232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951824380","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13193466,0.0048137754,0.8073195,0.012500377,0.0003615309,0.0009777498,0.0003731142,0.00024043606,0.041478805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90873003,0.002314603,0.08176308,0.00089690473,0.0003620572,0.00082298875,0.00016056602,0.000097652344,0.004852157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9649717,0.027607251,0.00073325244,0.00173425,0.0033202518,0.0016333697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7979969,0.18678297,0.0065903557,0.003458753,0.003216775,0.0019542635],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042877503,0.0007872368,0.0021542164,0.0023220354,0.0010382812,0.0034278657,0.0021108484,0.0028527186,0.0044439808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19899566,0.0011581293,0.00088769675,0.0014533437,0.004927799,0.005503472,0.00253781,0.003648508,0.00037014746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004474047,0.00023953956,0.004398315,0.0002645083,0.00014291302,0.00029333585,0.00026642668,0.19912064,0.0006219871,0.76375425,0.0024543134,0.027996294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033087144,0.00043184074,0.0032897952,0.00020144349,0.00011519547,0.00019078309,0.00021646962,0.44421452,0.0006522523,0.5464967,0.0038000282,0.000060113594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028972079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00214375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9571225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051140543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051344424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22676069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952126714","doi":"","title":"Litigation Risk Assessment: A Tool to Enhance Negotiation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Negotiation; Settlement (finance); Obligation; Presumption; Outcome (game theory); Litigation risk analysis; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Point (geometry); Public relations; Law; Sociology; Economics; Accounting; Finance","score_opus":0.011473443211713492,"score_gpt":0.2515301512480214,"score_spread":0.24005670803630794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952126714","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013942997,0.00027246782,0.9516727,0.0027147974,0.00017171305,0.0007369,0.00029164396,0.0089832395,0.02121356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12563352,0.0002268745,0.8684595,0.00032918816,0.00013677945,0.0007192167,0.0002630814,0.00076523505,0.0034665565],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9679083,0.020322084,0.0025017061,0.0023399869,0.00618389,0.00074396015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83390623,0.13641131,0.009600058,0.009868592,0.007736566,0.0024772102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042958356,0.002494068,0.0015452075,0.009920791,0.0029705158,0.01341514,0.003684438,0.003432358,0.020213267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16470285,0.0013948354,0.0014832747,0.003426209,0.0029993327,0.021932354,0.012819512,0.005044416,0.0051316223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095791783,0.00073099753,0.007226262,0.0012775556,0.00019623814,0.0010244837,0.03578008,0.015777994,0.008006042,0.22615428,0.023771986,0.67909616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038926152,0.00075230014,0.00522888,0.00220344,0.00028019358,0.0019188146,0.009853535,0.2219082,0.013672388,0.54821306,0.19490032,0.0006797001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007065672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010091715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042958356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017947732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002858223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22718823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952440936","doi":"","title":"LE RECOUVREMENT ET L’INDEMNISATION DES MEMBRES DANS L’ACTION COLLECTIVE","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Damages; Civil procedure; Class (philosophy); Action (physics); Collective action; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08944713779012117,"score_gpt":0.24723951208053604,"score_spread":0.15779237429041487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952440936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5065356,0.004869149,0.03770653,0.09277105,0.0021325483,0.00039544678,0.00011591518,0.0002265491,0.35524723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8582416,0.0010715048,0.0042085913,0.003354895,0.0005451635,0.00018401435,0.000040571358,0.00006331076,0.13229029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834757,0.005867775,0.00050048565,0.0016757745,0.005241652,0.00323859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892173,0.0037205333,0.0028824974,0.0011248154,0.0013840295,0.0016708003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012213906,0.00046348988,0.00046512706,0.0014793426,0.012649992,0.007564898,0.0025114696,0.005659348,0.01163608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040641386,0.00040656823,0.0006694031,0.0008764911,0.015702773,0.0050084805,0.0085303215,0.0061998293,0.002587476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007880592,0.00013335477,0.022204973,0.0001999772,0.000054774315,0.0034039484,0.29441756,0.00075308117,0.0028037978,0.52357227,0.024163589,0.12821378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020932705,0.00025256778,0.030905573,0.00077438063,0.000039203896,0.0019821327,0.16872914,0.00079797406,0.0018124647,0.030121287,0.76439315,0.00017124473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04640067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07866663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9923577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076423115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011410252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092261195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955915050","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12821","title":"THE “SALES AGENT” PROBLEM: EFFORT/LEISURE ALLOCATION UNDER PERFORMANCE PAY AS BEHAVIOR TOWARDS RISK","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Incentive; Intuition; Economics; Microeconomics; Risk aversion (psychology); Expected utility hypothesis; Actuarial science; Business; Financial economics","score_opus":0.03393137693832947,"score_gpt":0.2403013965238475,"score_spread":0.20637001958551804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955915050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64112586,0.0007385916,0.28685904,0.010721503,0.00014859355,0.00032188886,0.0006098532,0.00018633612,0.059288293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695686,0.00037963197,0.014680998,0.00024050042,0.000112078946,0.00017597784,0.00011581527,0.00003821587,0.014687952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831355,0.0010164196,0.000056328965,0.00028897403,0.00013166682,0.00019320077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941924,0.0037701004,0.0009553848,0.00030385685,0.0001906443,0.00058756303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004136075,0.00074020826,0.0013641936,0.0006159082,0.0009849529,0.003263034,0.0016311023,0.0039197784,0.0124663375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014117993,0.00065976393,0.0008171495,0.0006490237,0.0036807936,0.0048595658,0.001865561,0.0024107378,0.0007164273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051530515,0.0003866824,0.005957558,0.00016328131,0.000109057226,0.00046760624,0.00054045586,0.14122967,0.0017087997,0.8257281,0.003134098,0.020059464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026787215,0.00014937668,0.003955688,0.000057244484,0.000048856054,0.0001645439,0.00041481492,0.37104124,0.00047596835,0.620457,0.0029209962,0.0000463237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002589165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015835004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0124663375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021857657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014124028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04170406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956105474","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2019.06.013","title":"On de-bunking ‘fake news’ in a post truth era: Why does the Planning Fallacy explanation for cost overruns fall short?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Fallacy; Advertising; Economics; Computer security; Transport engineering; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12696470953914113,"score_gpt":0.3794252812872526,"score_spread":0.2524605717481115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956105474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11953963,0.006700352,0.07096379,0.37454066,0.0025933448,0.00014185152,0.0012468104,0.0005809376,0.42369267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.963903,0.001636273,0.0034254894,0.014224085,0.001424334,0.00004482966,0.00014008048,0.00024422968,0.014957643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593985,0.0012140876,0.00021380499,0.0006213675,0.0013267613,0.0006841165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9378559,0.043209385,0.007650162,0.005336927,0.0051831515,0.0007645104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008719125,0.00051256025,0.0007361462,0.0018224918,0.002428332,0.008172485,0.0015429307,0.009290752,0.030761736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085195586,0.0005318839,0.00057845167,0.0016965623,0.008119765,0.015539432,0.0021645958,0.0077126566,0.0026733633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011326407,0.00003905181,0.0022703963,0.0000961697,0.00003364647,0.0002952043,0.0011894925,0.0011594872,0.0001773309,0.9399348,0.029877543,0.024813566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053672917,0.000030941712,0.0035009673,0.0001463873,0.000037769194,0.00021036695,0.0010654018,0.0036623052,0.0007495083,0.9521056,0.03838168,0.00005543887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008857513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072852173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030761736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003059896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027094202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10290831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963086506","doi":"10.1145/3306618.3314250","title":"Incomplete Contracting and AI Alignment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Vector Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Parallels; Incomplete contracts; Core (optical fiber); Computer science; Work (physics); Principal (computer security); Focus (optics); Replicate; Management science; Economic analysis; Data science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Microeconomics; Operations management; Engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.02954110833850038,"score_gpt":0.25120180736783587,"score_spread":0.2216606990293355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963086506","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05046088,0.002354416,0.7910502,0.025056439,0.00028733624,0.00022253228,0.00023582138,0.00019965229,0.13013276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83116263,0.0017419488,0.15286705,0.0022244821,0.00039871075,0.0004575025,0.00022474647,0.00012637483,0.010796508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837171,0.0086194165,0.0012181604,0.0023418241,0.0029712436,0.0011322993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94459563,0.033188563,0.0083053885,0.007992509,0.004046621,0.0018712457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018241327,0.0006413999,0.0012243604,0.0024528822,0.0036628908,0.0064098733,0.002661772,0.0040076715,0.011093802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05687224,0.0006306923,0.0013483757,0.0027393848,0.015853647,0.014797498,0.006173665,0.005085173,0.0007458001],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062906925,0.000011288432,0.00039151116,0.000029592604,0.000009795781,0.000048359278,0.00030163277,0.0025120114,0.00006354495,0.9923023,0.00039113272,0.0039326004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006347608,0.0000088361,0.00017571605,0.000027902533,0.0000046668515,0.000055737655,0.00017004221,0.007380892,0.000096560405,0.9880392,0.004026932,0.000007168096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027985666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001742403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018241327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041384385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051378096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096470535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963661012","doi":"10.7202/1062166ar","title":"Efficacité et efficience : les obstacles épistémologiques à l’économisme en droit civil des contrats","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019678775533999097,"score_gpt":0.21449319835664143,"score_spread":0.19481442282264233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963661012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0423007,0.01343174,0.098415054,0.08260694,0.00059339305,0.00006988052,0.00020003424,0.00007675336,0.7623055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.904333,0.009356534,0.015477429,0.004976424,0.0006616887,0.00020268181,0.00010552635,0.00021859711,0.06466804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926795,0.003173865,0.00025272675,0.0010023849,0.0023417748,0.0005498051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99131846,0.0054534287,0.00068257464,0.0009992634,0.001254797,0.00029154084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064799814,0.0008139078,0.0007867062,0.002712402,0.0034710732,0.016643245,0.0019248009,0.0048648333,0.01225769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012548742,0.0005438233,0.00088169525,0.0023707894,0.031971175,0.015173798,0.005204986,0.006680727,0.001618508],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037836605,0.0000036410158,0.00012137293,0.000021424554,0.0000025742452,0.000012264171,0.00063549454,0.0001893862,0.000026893307,0.99653935,0.0004369188,0.002006902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009530736,0.00001322741,0.00050141325,0.00026393356,0.000010507111,0.00006379778,0.002438982,0.00095604727,0.00029154387,0.93096167,0.06447231,0.000016958887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008460103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064723054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016643245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007903507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006207752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0573442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963745909","doi":"10.1093/aler/ahz008","title":"Explaining Difference in the Quantity of Cases Heard by Courts of Last Resort","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Law and Economics Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Consistency (knowledge bases); Supreme court; Judicial interpretation; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.035370764139248806,"score_gpt":0.24428568683667812,"score_spread":0.2089149226974293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963745909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893463,0.00043208862,0.001635363,0.0008206087,0.000013934643,0.000032678516,0.0003068652,0.000020155527,0.007391905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990119,0.00006264433,0.0002293039,0.000037318558,0.000018662739,0.000004780316,0.00008088893,0.0000033163415,0.0005511437],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712354,0.0010243988,0.0002450254,0.00047218628,0.0006137199,0.000521158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9299947,0.046927266,0.014902385,0.0019503376,0.00311775,0.0031076143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037518619,0.0001229492,0.00042763632,0.002712407,0.0004672071,0.0024028576,0.0008043024,0.0009710944,0.010539568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03965478,0.00023964804,0.0003245401,0.0020049356,0.0009179854,0.000985702,0.0010511591,0.0009643758,0.00059124496],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044771543,0.0005086336,0.917178,0.00015797134,0.0002572789,0.0007692761,0.0008483454,0.016164692,0.0029891192,0.021012077,0.0030416236,0.03662527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007240857,0.0001683447,0.9539666,0.00005336726,0.00009399256,0.00029917646,0.001252841,0.023296164,0.0006356568,0.018252928,0.0018724422,0.000036079633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010400945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015818903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010539568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016384372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071803766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035258353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2966308444","doi":"10.1111/jpet.12390","title":"Principles versus principal: Reconciling norm compliance and shareholder value","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Shareholder; Human multitasking; Microeconomics; Revenue; Business; Principal–agent problem; Economics; Value (mathematics); Stakeholder; Context (archaeology); Compliance (psychology); Principal (computer security); Norm (philosophy); Stewardship (theology); Viewpoints; Accounting; Corporate governance; Finance; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.1192462038401267,"score_gpt":0.25727940525408466,"score_spread":0.13803320141395797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2966308444","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26963136,0.00033552025,0.6313626,0.012793556,0.00024559713,0.0003158731,0.000051832976,0.00035913297,0.08490451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9512717,0.000058364956,0.046568446,0.0003355243,0.000067610075,0.000117569914,0.000016287891,0.000039064387,0.0015253365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9510764,0.03007948,0.0023464311,0.004504003,0.009394878,0.002598789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9454154,0.024656646,0.00821185,0.013517017,0.0061111017,0.0020881337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046388768,0.00047123656,0.001105287,0.0017464336,0.0025476264,0.0068016117,0.0022308603,0.0038534685,0.0025028393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08240316,0.000525216,0.0006832383,0.0013430422,0.014381565,0.009095629,0.0063477643,0.0037166714,0.00041589778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007973677,0.00011434091,0.002788964,0.00005202533,0.000031643405,0.000117310236,0.0014238284,0.006944465,0.001423916,0.95877695,0.0007663615,0.027480552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007344485,0.00016562548,0.0016904902,0.000075030825,0.000026920856,0.00009622918,0.0007631341,0.031711787,0.0018635087,0.9557408,0.0077521303,0.00004078056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013185983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014486127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046388768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026877031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062671164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24533015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969942600","doi":"","title":"Reconceptualizing Aggravated Damages: Recognizing the Dignitary Interest and Referential Loss","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05416571985114833,"score_gpt":0.19399328775093463,"score_spread":0.1398275678997863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969942600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10658277,0.016201349,0.21448278,0.13979813,0.0015607341,0.00028283676,0.00011589512,0.00020283123,0.5207727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94689476,0.0024270213,0.017595218,0.013165426,0.00065048115,0.00008605226,0.000034327786,0.000059568476,0.019087097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749383,0.006289489,0.0009839805,0.0019104269,0.012663329,0.003214597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900719,0.0049230102,0.00092511956,0.0015274375,0.0021076144,0.00044492318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016085055,0.00073596096,0.0010396225,0.002403134,0.0067106267,0.016702965,0.00462281,0.010525594,0.0032604884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022669157,0.0006586274,0.000887857,0.0012722216,0.044114575,0.014024849,0.011378496,0.011874699,0.00031255922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059442305,0.000008403696,0.0002545175,0.000017447821,0.0000072465677,0.0001716079,0.002270834,0.0006415127,0.00017360163,0.98882794,0.00093091535,0.0066901054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002818048,0.000031149455,0.0016633525,0.00030692056,0.00004037903,0.00023691032,0.003048926,0.0021506904,0.00088253256,0.9150378,0.07649153,0.00008158687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10170473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16032042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10170473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025533918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034629826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20222545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972466504","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3351123","title":"The Impacts of Judge Ideology on Auditors’ Litigation Risk: Evidence from Auditors’ Behaviors","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Accounting; Litigation risk analysis; Business; Ideology; Actuarial science; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0126409752633393,"score_gpt":0.2258955804037253,"score_spread":0.213254605140386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972466504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966444,0.00012734576,0.00007809638,0.0002583208,0.000004469304,0.000004780339,0.00003831216,0.0000019882673,0.0028422975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961627,0.000053386273,0.00002846559,0.000033852662,0.000008786212,0.00000204979,0.000026850319,0.0000010163894,0.00022922916],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919573,0.0041687707,0.0006914824,0.0005259678,0.001671774,0.0009846324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74434274,0.1534306,0.08366461,0.00640085,0.0067569013,0.0054043066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009738416,0.00018770379,0.00033463314,0.001521875,0.0010997421,0.0029416294,0.0004937798,0.001159766,0.0046578636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067801006,0.00030458483,0.00037858973,0.0013766997,0.0011224054,0.0011518175,0.001049492,0.001345581,0.00058707246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006179205,0.00035587535,0.9897413,0.000016560469,0.00014406307,0.00007140337,0.0014150898,0.00028295306,0.0003061778,0.0004765755,0.00031181166,0.0062602563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041118765,0.00015198013,0.9960821,0.000014874499,0.000058606023,0.00005785434,0.001809098,0.0005015773,0.0002107254,0.0006723839,0.00038739207,0.000012399922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057268324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009365511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009738416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000730196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010559572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051502287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2976887837","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3358","title":"Impact: How Law Affects Behavior, by Lawrence M. Friedman","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Natural law; Sovereignty; Economic Justice; Political science; Supreme court; Public law; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.026328496438995517,"score_gpt":0.2353576712472386,"score_spread":0.2090291748082431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976887837","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018216167,0.10310497,0.0063613057,0.6508516,0.0054664738,0.000049234568,0.0014329702,0.00016081621,0.21435644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.738593,0.08895384,0.004152723,0.059030443,0.0062943846,0.000225431,0.00075380877,0.00022495787,0.10177145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987318,0.00068466767,0.00003801923,0.00021413258,0.0002410675,0.00009036962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702007,0.0020324932,0.00025467077,0.00014606408,0.0003711528,0.00017550119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020419436,0.0007676054,0.00040771766,0.0013910307,0.0022576011,0.004554451,0.00077694387,0.002686439,0.011254947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013701768,0.00029643095,0.00047297342,0.0016031968,0.005966558,0.0068095797,0.0017243911,0.0031031112,0.001827775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012270197,0.00010718517,0.011908476,0.00017167209,0.00008578223,0.00014286333,0.0025294386,0.0020504247,0.00011257285,0.5756787,0.3393715,0.06771863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043698037,0.000057853347,0.015982546,0.0006955116,0.000050413208,0.00013088543,0.0020721827,0.0017931485,0.00013131164,0.5593219,0.41966826,0.000052218566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024475833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017887808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024475833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045686527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024934511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048666775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978609556","doi":"10.29173/alr2567","title":"Defining Wrongful Dismissal: The Alberta Schism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Strength and Conditioning Association","keywords":"Notice; Doctrine; Schism; Dismissal; Law; Common law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.019671097297649886,"score_gpt":0.2216462664047025,"score_spread":0.20197516910705263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978609556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06318354,0.016735498,0.03386177,0.17262208,0.0017525834,0.000104229715,0.00021302585,0.00013315085,0.7113941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93435985,0.00405722,0.0041407472,0.022575878,0.0008575389,0.00005501971,0.000065846456,0.000068045316,0.03381984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838201,0.0031823218,0.0005330972,0.0016124777,0.007953635,0.002898413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845994,0.0077907383,0.00087818573,0.0010863077,0.004640794,0.0010045493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011282147,0.00035388296,0.00064485316,0.0037049395,0.010550788,0.019782458,0.003445796,0.011315957,0.0042575635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01961773,0.00075230794,0.00057982554,0.0029991558,0.04168916,0.0057674386,0.0062207407,0.011817547,0.000633047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005895429,0.0000064894016,0.0006906125,0.00001348583,0.0000029478256,0.00016064128,0.0012682064,0.00023460308,0.000057848123,0.9864579,0.0061431727,0.0049582347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021052223,0.000020755528,0.0055085206,0.0003109334,0.00003242671,0.00036152915,0.0034036792,0.0018642728,0.00023333475,0.8811352,0.10701563,0.00009255738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5894083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61499065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41059172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040183645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05370383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8260195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980846281","doi":"10.2308/accr-52612","title":"The Interaction of Perceived Subjectivity and Pay Transparency on Professional Judgment in a Profit Pool Setting: The Case of Large Law Firms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Accounting Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Subjectivity; Confidentiality; Business; Profit (economics); Law; Psychology; Accounting; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.024668766301098963,"score_gpt":0.2681141424018248,"score_spread":0.24344537610072584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980846281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99474686,0.0000403569,0.0002126212,0.00030256395,0.0000019354857,0.000019529118,0.000008762294,0.0000020971142,0.0046653086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998197,0.000008260169,0.000039435145,0.000018000981,0.0000017797839,0.0000030934657,0.0000027149595,6.315899e-7,0.00010635779],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809075,0.01362524,0.00047208727,0.0008389961,0.0023971987,0.0017589132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89454937,0.06801586,0.023200307,0.0038688832,0.0040075686,0.006357982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0126712,0.00018408238,0.00043870544,0.0013367726,0.004405836,0.0060021416,0.00076694664,0.0012399683,0.0052304165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059493486,0.0003005264,0.0002162319,0.0010074424,0.0051132827,0.0016935025,0.003563279,0.0013679725,0.0002579164],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011122806,0.0018988716,0.7228723,0.00018334603,0.00018856053,0.004466638,0.21988815,0.0018741646,0.0042379913,0.011430167,0.0012017082,0.030645795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001127636,0.00028453668,0.8455034,0.00007155383,0.00006190272,0.0004327496,0.14040305,0.0033065623,0.0006930455,0.006733493,0.0023011377,0.00009569866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04866255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06508355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04866255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048566475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033134886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096758604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981480703","doi":"","title":"Umbrella effects e a repressão a cartéis no Brasil: análise sob a ótica do private enforcement","year":2019,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Americanae (AECID Library)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Enforcement; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.011156487339856334,"score_gpt":0.2008898541297322,"score_spread":0.18973336678987587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981480703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88621104,0.0011307338,0.000773236,0.0029271971,0.00003669557,0.0000925429,0.00023148803,0.000024416815,0.10857279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99366534,0.00045990187,0.0002276015,0.00017560647,0.000011502684,0.000015901354,0.000043670567,0.000005637292,0.0053949235],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688184,0.0008662185,0.00012928146,0.00034230037,0.001168448,0.0006119087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866377,0.004743121,0.003659762,0.0018966335,0.0021446813,0.00091803184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035016462,0.00025700568,0.00042031426,0.002380247,0.0034014855,0.0037772576,0.00080651423,0.00096737064,0.012421444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011708581,0.00026194844,0.00034851572,0.002432066,0.005263221,0.0016297626,0.002379373,0.00086917524,0.00034526983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038873806,0.0003527534,0.5977735,0.00087997864,0.0002053002,0.0014757935,0.12832667,0.0008306764,0.005230796,0.102911934,0.0061301403,0.15549383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027493035,0.00014572291,0.86365163,0.0004674327,0.00015278289,0.00032118947,0.066477254,0.000946976,0.00096285786,0.006728059,0.060072098,0.0000464878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15099676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26781905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15099676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045128465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004765079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3002357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991149282","doi":"10.29173/mlj912","title":"Bargaining for Expedience: The Overuse of Joint Recommendations on Sentence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Joint (building); Business; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Architectural engineering","score_opus":0.07136275878165192,"score_gpt":0.24217465984153438,"score_spread":0.17081190105988248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991149282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7473514,0.0012411524,0.02964126,0.011049682,0.000310206,0.00023409862,0.00014156534,0.00018214554,0.2098484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99122965,0.00019152604,0.0027877227,0.0006700949,0.00009976109,0.000046580655,0.000026004464,0.000026958995,0.004921768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9536424,0.027637787,0.0029523615,0.0024878313,0.010698932,0.0025806664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8606239,0.103408985,0.015528457,0.009145309,0.008418644,0.0028746352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03264445,0.00035768346,0.00055367214,0.0015492389,0.003606938,0.0053564045,0.0014761778,0.0034700888,0.0130181685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15123494,0.0003952109,0.00049775146,0.0013854112,0.0034745105,0.0035025412,0.0034507527,0.004448266,0.0012633824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011773274,0.0007800423,0.079642944,0.00045577285,0.00025068142,0.0037304792,0.034163482,0.009438373,0.008217886,0.58020955,0.017239619,0.26469386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042390425,0.0015608686,0.25738725,0.0014320713,0.00042155068,0.0030411785,0.055030804,0.050281465,0.0069547384,0.43714532,0.18585469,0.00046613527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055387067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008164554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039641187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040161256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17264241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991430525","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avaa018","title":"Enforcement of Chinese Insider Trading Law: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Insider trading; Enforcement; Sanctions; Business; China; Insider; Law enforcement; Empirical research; Accounting; Law; Political science; Finance; Statistics","score_opus":0.11547314081365181,"score_gpt":0.3256408916637385,"score_spread":0.21016775085008668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991430525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.971283,0.0023597921,0.0003326853,0.0007212783,0.00002227379,0.000030471996,0.00020861934,0.000007090497,0.025034925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699354,0.0015944106,0.00014569111,0.000055900342,0.000027888438,0.000008960556,0.00018530893,0.0000018334314,0.0009864419],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852115,0.00028744122,0.00012408794,0.00015268056,0.00059839967,0.0003163497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99583364,0.0014264866,0.001440379,0.00025805208,0.00077529665,0.00026618794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024510568,0.00024492724,0.00032031324,0.008062388,0.0015523613,0.0022337364,0.0007506687,0.0004079961,0.0037279548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004526848,0.00015314638,0.0003207123,0.009878595,0.0026807103,0.0017592064,0.0012662393,0.0004522615,0.00012164148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095187475,0.00019272973,0.7223742,0.00079024007,0.00017535828,0.0038008327,0.03154625,0.0024049887,0.0011067627,0.14182274,0.0035599722,0.0921308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006579547,0.000090388705,0.96468675,0.00021611262,0.00006943965,0.00043076315,0.014615523,0.0033881161,0.00056261086,0.002716911,0.01317696,0.000039819668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06202333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05997773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06202333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042992346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004011278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12332463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992110091","doi":"","title":"Judicial Bias: The Ongoing Challenge","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of dispute resolution","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10194654154793911,"score_gpt":0.2463779841651899,"score_spread":0.1444314426172508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992110091","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009044643,0.034948677,0.0016235905,0.91939485,0.0015996428,0.000009333525,0.000074844545,0.000022365592,0.033282094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6780885,0.05808597,0.003151107,0.22725804,0.014104326,0.000064318265,0.0001232282,0.00010658126,0.019017939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95349926,0.01640974,0.0013942326,0.004909239,0.017256709,0.0065308367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9024725,0.0562973,0.0043817866,0.0048959204,0.022435576,0.009516994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053961646,0.00033653082,0.0014034042,0.0029440497,0.011781862,0.0133297695,0.0040889103,0.011436805,0.0063801054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090320244,0.00041776252,0.00057841995,0.0030837054,0.036795054,0.010910166,0.0073171095,0.0119795,0.0011768371],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026607146,0.000045616474,0.004408892,0.00018920959,0.000026617168,0.00015639333,0.0052892733,0.00035534892,0.00009056981,0.8238648,0.07729723,0.08824954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044610068,0.000028792814,0.0067983717,0.0015304434,0.000030064683,0.00028758854,0.011888603,0.00052335544,0.0001604079,0.50125283,0.47739124,0.000063687185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16497035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18507634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16497035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03696546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05364903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32802022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994027783","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3777083","title":"Parametric Rules for State Contingent Claims","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"UK-India Education and Research Initiative","keywords":"Parametric statistics; State (computer science); Econometrics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Statistics; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.02083533884350765,"score_gpt":0.2203388067434755,"score_spread":0.19950346789996784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994027783","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028561246,0.0003249591,0.9502601,0.0010252409,0.00008719876,0.000097498654,0.00046828395,0.0003997677,0.01877574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8309614,0.00080042466,0.14457324,0.00023767547,0.00026320724,0.00040950364,0.0008301126,0.0002845091,0.021639882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949727,0.0021558213,0.00042402308,0.0006655791,0.0013438567,0.00043795453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95081466,0.040319413,0.0017759649,0.0048302165,0.0017624854,0.0004971743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008581647,0.00072009687,0.0013997216,0.0015742255,0.0009864592,0.0054432107,0.0028380435,0.002608533,0.010468632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058210984,0.0012075497,0.0016944057,0.001546762,0.0024327834,0.0077172955,0.0023959202,0.0056533157,0.0017707277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029270885,0.000029144538,0.00032744123,0.00003066527,0.000017708777,0.00008266825,0.000120368124,0.033414043,0.0002137155,0.95187265,0.0013598078,0.012502556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000153887,0.000008166682,0.00013635655,0.000014812584,0.000008837365,0.000052167994,0.000015358775,0.15695345,0.0001684132,0.8415038,0.0011106217,0.0000126854575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013370796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001557522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010468632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015419114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011627504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045384645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994256005","doi":"10.1017/9781108694469.005","title":"How Lower Courts Respond to a Change in a Legal Rule","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Court of record; Remand (court procedure); Tax court; Law of the case; Political science; Court of equity; Court decision; Original jurisdiction; Jurisdiction; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03785027759243018,"score_gpt":0.18874528388284267,"score_spread":0.1508950062904125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994256005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86620444,0.0011141048,0.0033741177,0.043508124,0.00032965426,0.00014158348,0.0017635028,0.00007618622,0.083488435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98876053,0.00018653735,0.00046155034,0.0037021504,0.00020082493,0.000030827912,0.0006579357,0.000026408601,0.0059731477],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97161317,0.010222742,0.0010360911,0.0039949766,0.0073871287,0.0057458933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9157635,0.044081867,0.020870415,0.004055452,0.010134247,0.0050945077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014930322,0.00018938287,0.0009447,0.002063961,0.0030973887,0.009534974,0.0021361508,0.004517152,0.010417011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11096312,0.00035877767,0.0005349623,0.0031993643,0.0028041,0.0029618514,0.0023973284,0.004701611,0.001853263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007495657,0.0011044741,0.5770941,0.00021260128,0.00052190095,0.003157215,0.016730601,0.022090018,0.0032527978,0.16441521,0.104906306,0.10576539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035346282,0.00042708678,0.64626193,0.0003365889,0.00028481387,0.00056608085,0.029430332,0.03188836,0.002020573,0.13760981,0.15047717,0.00034374118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14710876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15126193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14710876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010674867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055781077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29250497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998825458","doi":"10.1257/pandp.20201034","title":"The Allocation of Decision Authority to Human and Artificial Intelligence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AEA Papers and Proceedings","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Investment (military); Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Reliability (semiconductor); Operations research; Engineering; Computer security; Political science","score_opus":0.04988189374101219,"score_gpt":0.2453172870928158,"score_spread":0.1954353933518036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998825458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1591474,0.0042733937,0.14425157,0.022372043,0.00046756974,0.00020763405,0.000064823296,0.000085078296,0.6691305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986967,0.0004989906,0.0046932725,0.000603193,0.00015567914,0.000056382705,0.000009742424,0.000019322535,0.0069963606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97957385,0.013144804,0.00048077133,0.001378034,0.0035753301,0.001847243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9671764,0.019885112,0.0038347654,0.0032362686,0.0030935458,0.0027740127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014641788,0.0005598275,0.00059054967,0.0023546685,0.0020848657,0.0077550043,0.0009460769,0.0022354363,0.010717726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043985363,0.00038000316,0.0004159636,0.0014199709,0.015244963,0.0056224354,0.0035955375,0.0021637091,0.0008054997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089669236,0.000048831465,0.0030395119,0.000052449606,0.000027683951,0.00009225537,0.0009525262,0.003543208,0.00043702775,0.9708651,0.0010913875,0.019760368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000668558,0.00013279717,0.0066113113,0.00016616374,0.000024368286,0.00019718886,0.0015288638,0.00890693,0.00047559352,0.9550859,0.02676971,0.00003435463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002200424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021071706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014641788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047374615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043903203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07743412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000410985","doi":"","title":"“The Life of a Reserve”: How Might We Improve the Structure, Content, Accessibility, Length Timeliness of Judicial Decisions?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BC Cancer Agency; University of Oxford; Royal Bank of Canada; McMaster University; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Business; Computer science; Internet privacy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07330816940623473,"score_gpt":0.3002588020069918,"score_spread":0.22695063260075704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000410985","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2004858,0.008012486,0.15194838,0.33936477,0.0016372618,0.00050427293,0.0009982806,0.0012476508,0.29580116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91491604,0.0025057173,0.04891969,0.008812601,0.0005490736,0.00015913394,0.00036261504,0.00034595456,0.0234292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728387,0.014667754,0.0012308655,0.0022226453,0.00610185,0.0029381143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92148685,0.035582356,0.008001282,0.012354667,0.016384741,0.006190193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035655253,0.00033527947,0.00062115124,0.0030221285,0.010011581,0.016180001,0.0030408173,0.0022607367,0.013027208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13843802,0.00071174325,0.00048721326,0.003662311,0.021344138,0.01944477,0.0038709296,0.0043796287,0.0027716588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001989255,0.0001231293,0.013265935,0.0002827172,0.000048784506,0.00024250858,0.03394496,0.0031447343,0.0013610885,0.6329686,0.040636476,0.27378213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077189325,0.00020089975,0.022113891,0.0013251812,0.000086267915,0.00022931331,0.024934249,0.003668072,0.0029152362,0.40025944,0.54396,0.0002303606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17926706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21711886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17926706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019020777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047594897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35644722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001969679","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3501168","title":"The Regulatory and Capital-Market Effects of a U.S. Approach to Enforcement: Evidence from China","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; China; Business; Regulatory reform; Capital (architecture); Economics; Market economy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.007052891029932029,"score_gpt":0.18153950500173138,"score_spread":0.17448661397179935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001969679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99020493,0.000503509,0.00018044846,0.0014855756,0.000014273689,0.00002663108,0.0001508765,0.000011230868,0.0074226027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983972,0.00019582761,0.000036042762,0.0002252591,0.0000137658535,0.0000050062536,0.000069333255,0.0000015365247,0.0010560108],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792707,0.00048493998,0.00013429944,0.00026013554,0.0005409857,0.0006525347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862533,0.0037690953,0.005949618,0.0008428717,0.0020944043,0.0010906769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035205567,0.00018917712,0.00043230766,0.0015003078,0.0014900657,0.0018110357,0.00082765036,0.00096770533,0.0038458707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077796606,0.00018848646,0.0004959549,0.0021759744,0.0026906892,0.00066166336,0.00094669044,0.00092813984,0.00019494191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005543526,0.0007213664,0.9314314,0.00012625878,0.00035799138,0.00055548036,0.0023093955,0.0033782674,0.0011552136,0.028075067,0.004046759,0.027288355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014717627,0.0002542088,0.9882118,0.000053312917,0.00022815028,0.000053269763,0.001258743,0.003563222,0.0006881456,0.0020764477,0.003440608,0.000024997249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24774389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3553411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24774389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038725298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006817717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49260378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002611457","doi":"","title":"LA NOTION DE DOMMAGE DANS LE CADRE DU DÉLIT DE NÉGLIGENCE (COMMON LAW) ET DE LA RESPONSABILITÉ EXTRACONTRACTUELLE DU FAIT PERSONNEL (DROIT CIVIL) AU CANADA: UNE ÉTUDE EN DROIT COMPARÉ (The Notion of Injury in the Tort of Negligence (Common Law) and the Personal Extracontractual Liability (Civil Law) in Canada: A Comparative Study)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Context (archaeology); Law; Humanities; Common law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Prejudice (legal term); Liability; Commercial law; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.008392770669544691,"score_gpt":0.22511066312531605,"score_spread":0.21671789245577136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002611457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9236052,0.0058267154,0.0016293939,0.010620663,0.000062650404,0.000059486898,0.00021549054,0.000008266593,0.05797214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944331,0.0016304188,0.00029959393,0.00031465126,0.000008128552,0.000009968537,0.000032667496,0.000003711297,0.0032676863],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965442,0.0006728664,0.000095500945,0.00029589003,0.0014397794,0.00095168414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956773,0.0014117867,0.00072968536,0.000114783295,0.0013638572,0.0007025545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024892997,0.00031466768,0.00038040368,0.002904526,0.012043959,0.0073057823,0.0014660953,0.0013578255,0.0050697275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065211183,0.00023091763,0.00032879203,0.0062203137,0.020564932,0.0028733695,0.0033083244,0.0022980135,0.00014643632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007093683,0.00010853651,0.1309063,0.00043600716,0.000050457074,0.0006285692,0.5337886,0.00084064226,0.00091805344,0.2782845,0.0047298353,0.049237575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011602795,0.000051471357,0.4090557,0.00074289413,0.000058083566,0.00030594828,0.51097417,0.00063345494,0.00050524675,0.010175071,0.06737824,0.000108142674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98765093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99263895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102793194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.102793194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08831831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7458203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003855018","doi":"10.4324/9780203063668-11","title":"The Intensity of Witchcraft Prosecutions: Evidence from Assize and Quarter Sessions Records","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Psychology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.05596952149675829,"score_gpt":0.21881466095506666,"score_spread":0.16284513945830836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003855018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98522425,0.00082717417,0.00018757096,0.000932497,0.000017203738,0.0000229303,0.0013240839,0.000012863924,0.011451563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99610597,0.0005792051,0.00006541374,0.00017698298,0.00007020146,0.000015104059,0.00082203385,0.000009036729,0.002156096],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99425805,0.002133011,0.0005804695,0.0005082368,0.0017352357,0.00078506104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77018374,0.10455882,0.09964019,0.008526326,0.0096861245,0.0074048233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004486299,0.00015844815,0.0005338284,0.0055357446,0.0018640476,0.0032033904,0.0016487208,0.0016949187,0.006899851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08145024,0.00046192034,0.00025181408,0.0068283416,0.0020036555,0.0028248995,0.0021880225,0.0020241702,0.0015770504],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056288834,0.00034706353,0.97400045,0.00007296546,0.00012392054,0.00027651587,0.0035198897,0.00027399638,0.00016402111,0.002782442,0.004462619,0.013413302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016916365,0.000096902084,0.9930836,0.000045260265,0.000050799143,0.00028339785,0.0032444904,0.00022113815,0.00025764125,0.0009117631,0.0017740765,0.000014088975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01556323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026765376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01556323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010070968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001183764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030945241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005856840","doi":"10.3138/9781487514662","title":"Courts in Federal Countries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Structuring; Principal (computer security); Competence (human resources); Political science; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Public relations; Law; Computer science; Psychology; Computer security; Social psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.027443179023475924,"score_gpt":0.1924086133671433,"score_spread":0.16496543434366737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005856840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004010945,0.011340931,0.0017617956,0.005994331,0.0006914701,0.000028332946,0.00011948393,0.00008836092,0.97596437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4354413,0.019209316,0.0042223865,0.0094724065,0.0012959759,0.00012281981,0.0003674233,0.00008005281,0.5297884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988471,0.00040911886,0.00005464129,0.0001621669,0.00026377797,0.00026311242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990727,0.0003661221,0.00008710576,0.00013486625,0.00026325995,0.00007602906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090312876,0.00023296407,0.00021720347,0.0013211261,0.004314393,0.006942612,0.00056165375,0.0016860347,0.0144596975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026390913,0.00021028452,0.0002457136,0.0018062167,0.0035796987,0.0026918908,0.0015913813,0.002493221,0.0020821888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016762743,0.0000034302607,0.000087960136,0.000015243254,0.0000010439429,0.000024285864,0.0006760636,0.000113453134,0.00003194674,0.9459255,0.0406257,0.012493802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042296383,0.000006950342,0.00068875926,0.00020196255,0.000004343266,0.00006676495,0.0004205724,0.00019314252,0.00008422859,0.12528044,0.8730427,0.000005946162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014334282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017740004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144596975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042468975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00553104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048372507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010526667","doi":"10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092255","title":"Plea Bargaining, Conviction Without Trial, and the Global Administratization of Criminal Convictions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Criminology","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Plea; Conviction; Law; Political science; Criminal trial; Criminal procedure; Criminal justice; Criminology; Criminal Conviction; Criminal law; Phenomenon; Psychology","score_opus":0.08346271173499144,"score_gpt":0.2941941103156946,"score_spread":0.21073139858070317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010526667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6975084,0.0049626655,0.028926035,0.009365663,0.00007143223,0.00010473496,0.00030870573,0.00014143178,0.2586109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624974,0.000507017,0.0008211029,0.00017108007,0.00003899513,0.000023795454,0.000038016286,0.000015522719,0.0021347823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938133,0.0032435104,0.00033635015,0.00093910354,0.00085049245,0.0008172362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979502,0.0079613235,0.008529576,0.002048733,0.0009706224,0.0009876149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007149867,0.00022854656,0.0005545859,0.0030849779,0.00216243,0.0055083726,0.00077224826,0.0012332276,0.0063318913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02182246,0.000321238,0.00045764493,0.0044378145,0.014210984,0.0055997833,0.0056748833,0.0026943614,0.0005902945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014111705,0.00008573772,0.055170443,0.00010231228,0.000097986085,0.0003502385,0.0053746095,0.008975435,0.00060052983,0.87027144,0.0021476215,0.05668261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078590754,0.00016547088,0.24604814,0.0002989774,0.00010963357,0.00049455423,0.007695761,0.006757492,0.0008743939,0.70393443,0.033422906,0.00011967213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00837917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008527104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00837917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044754534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018287584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03781253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011307461","doi":"","title":"Imposing Self-Interest: Behavioural Law and Economics, theUltimatum Game, and Value Possibilities","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Value (mathematics); Self-interest; Law; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02724120270932362,"score_gpt":0.22073243754905897,"score_spread":0.19349123483973535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011307461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50128835,0.002455684,0.12136268,0.046843987,0.00018351863,0.00012905303,0.000232028,0.000075710814,0.327429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904839,0.00034318175,0.0022536286,0.0006339032,0.00006982574,0.00004227809,0.000016404716,0.00000910421,0.0061478806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974171,0.0014219374,0.00008080734,0.0002000226,0.000392374,0.0004877593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921868,0.0055720573,0.00065071636,0.00057090184,0.00047616646,0.00054324453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004567072,0.00050320197,0.0008860485,0.00074047,0.0021700829,0.008086475,0.0014514392,0.004498179,0.007369588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011087992,0.00045479406,0.00065930793,0.00081863767,0.011512234,0.0073193577,0.0026376923,0.004435487,0.00030400173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010003893,0.00001832029,0.00023661449,0.0000054418965,0.0000031552795,0.00002251928,0.000077916084,0.00072559254,0.000033455824,0.99768233,0.00025873265,0.0009259703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012691698,0.0000057964703,0.00024243447,0.000007578906,0.0000027221504,0.000011673779,0.000093125505,0.0034584638,0.00003558056,0.99550736,0.00061763334,0.000004921671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008676027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010827367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008676027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053905877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003582945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039111614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011366547","doi":"","title":"How Contractual Risk Allocation Provisions of Oil and Gas Contracts Have Been or May Be interpreted by an English Court – A Case Study of Some Model Offshore Drilling Rig Contracts Developed in the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States of America","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fossil fuel; Submarine pipeline; Petroleum engineering; Offshore oil and gas; Drilling; Engineering; Business; Economics; Waste management; Mechanical engineering; Geotechnical engineering","score_opus":0.05341424289370016,"score_gpt":0.27606624107201305,"score_spread":0.22265199817831288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011366547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8511564,0.000305601,0.0069726747,0.0055609858,0.000047965605,0.00014954164,0.00014375108,0.000020972615,0.13564202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833309,0.00017256082,0.0022305467,0.0006068362,0.0000147950495,0.0000381188,0.000042963533,0.000024867993,0.013538508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923177,0.0039019934,0.00033257736,0.00047889308,0.0015331962,0.001435765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798527,0.01554681,0.0010730241,0.0010813315,0.001969626,0.00047656792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0121232355,0.00025217806,0.00042724068,0.00073538255,0.008393318,0.008024878,0.0013850221,0.0068146093,0.0050499425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03475265,0.0004984273,0.00052361324,0.0014514308,0.0058546187,0.0043165176,0.0021079066,0.005422171,0.00042211273],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025762926,0.00025719378,0.01938456,0.00007344212,0.000059331345,0.006517436,0.044138666,0.011196254,0.0023832233,0.88953,0.0066915615,0.019510666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005558834,0.0005082601,0.06372276,0.0008585675,0.00045886173,0.0038006818,0.18081196,0.06947107,0.010439061,0.40255898,0.26627228,0.0005416989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15435857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21813136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84564143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0090255495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010125817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30692017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021772929","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.585770","title":"Deterrence vs Judicial Error: A Comparative View of Standards of Proof","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Deterrence (psychology); Deterrence theory; Law and economics; Contrast (vision); Burden of proof; Economics; Law; Political science; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03048607294139099,"score_gpt":0.2616911911064225,"score_spread":0.23120511816503153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021772929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068028204,0.026821416,0.25609434,0.06941042,0.00073336856,0.00025158087,0.00035104668,0.00019754222,0.5781121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700533,0.0043505523,0.018258836,0.0020582639,0.0011186949,0.00019175006,0.00008472468,0.00007251767,0.003811353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91922307,0.04104495,0.0040827533,0.004378286,0.027351713,0.0039193328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6503459,0.26968363,0.019927995,0.029688932,0.027322726,0.003030822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061919704,0.00076932076,0.002420125,0.010785249,0.003201456,0.021286434,0.0050533745,0.012593312,0.008208975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21125835,0.0009934878,0.0019000346,0.0061587854,0.031929307,0.024652073,0.0051665716,0.009223896,0.0009952541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014516938,0.000007788674,0.00010445918,0.000024306426,0.0000072062326,0.000005554993,0.00018881662,0.00036094736,0.000028259885,0.99650663,0.00033836477,0.002413063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003130078,0.00003145852,0.0005080446,0.000117267096,0.000022101643,0.000043788226,0.00028039634,0.0016145455,0.00012625166,0.9928215,0.004386511,0.000016910193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022025346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016536864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061919704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075093796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071400944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3274666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021807766","doi":"","title":"Putting Free-Riding to Work: A Partnership Solution to the Common-Property Problem","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Subgame perfect equilibrium; Incentive; Stackelberg competition; Limited partnership; Economics; Monopoly; Microeconomics; Revenue; Oligopoly; Work (physics); Business; Game theory; Cournot competition; Finance; Engineering","score_opus":0.10444907965732216,"score_gpt":0.2966270523307834,"score_spread":0.19217797267346126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021807766","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2062062,0.0003478983,0.6681369,0.0064900117,0.00016215739,0.00045044278,0.0002520476,0.0002819237,0.11767233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9229105,0.00021516053,0.059923142,0.00030065628,0.000055797565,0.00029401665,0.00008920329,0.00006222822,0.016149271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968274,0.0017655524,0.00010797758,0.00040789932,0.00030756666,0.0005834914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99345434,0.0028965478,0.00059703336,0.0010985476,0.00038832016,0.0015652699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031801397,0.00059552025,0.0011457343,0.0006358378,0.0017433688,0.0026387023,0.0023928552,0.0034093133,0.0147376815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010648532,0.0004426972,0.0010663896,0.0007390544,0.0029259499,0.0040930915,0.0050642705,0.0024587228,0.0011445715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024935533,0.00033519615,0.0008259905,0.00010420344,0.00005094551,0.0006022565,0.0005684586,0.06970449,0.0013768504,0.9015195,0.004756319,0.019906405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003164435,0.00018527542,0.00025221618,0.000035283294,0.000028100025,0.00023930185,0.0003697009,0.2031947,0.00061483687,0.785395,0.009336291,0.000032823915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015847922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018213573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0147376815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010289832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024851083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04930252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021895755","doi":"10.17159/2225-7160/2020/v53a2","title":"Carpe Pecuniam: Criminal forfeiture of tainted legal fees","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"De Jure","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminology; Business; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03162970166006248,"score_gpt":0.21278494064842354,"score_spread":0.18115523898836106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021895755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08841765,0.003453938,0.004644042,0.025820073,0.00023546655,0.00007709427,0.0000646134,0.000038415368,0.8772486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8631995,0.002714599,0.0014029942,0.0051328177,0.00015562041,0.000059581744,0.00003225503,0.000027226451,0.1272754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736255,0.000573427,0.00008421122,0.0003501158,0.00073009206,0.00089962117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762976,0.0008998511,0.00038027545,0.0003160712,0.0005218702,0.00025207252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015534919,0.00029437503,0.0002747518,0.0012868495,0.006635626,0.007784509,0.0011271376,0.0049132444,0.012031789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008389215,0.00025495293,0.0003600341,0.0011008814,0.011563217,0.00585102,0.0033672045,0.0049950606,0.00088666327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010293053,0.000015344242,0.0012361769,0.00002182296,0.000002372906,0.00043514132,0.0010045007,0.00015126079,0.000098771714,0.9852064,0.0045574163,0.0072604595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006003536,0.00014198238,0.019981215,0.00083186105,0.000078188634,0.0041953665,0.011837588,0.0042196508,0.003260216,0.5773143,0.37794894,0.00013056636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08556894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12113927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08556894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009865602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011055418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17014176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022598423","doi":"","title":"Screening and Selecting Safe Contractors and Subcontractors","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ASSE Professional Development Conference and Exposition","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PCL Construction (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Construction engineering; Operations management; Risk analysis (engineering); Forensic engineering; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.048597518057521626,"score_gpt":0.2563619159328919,"score_spread":0.2077643978753703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022598423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9383201,0.00094388676,0.027798401,0.0036490073,0.00011544361,0.000964614,0.000634807,0.00017136913,0.027402323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741998,0.0003512787,0.014633432,0.00044220145,0.00004735985,0.00021346849,0.00039400152,0.000024940042,0.009693569],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937436,0.002660392,0.00037099552,0.00044394788,0.0011529522,0.0016279916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9640034,0.022294655,0.003078744,0.0015323662,0.004949875,0.0041409894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009216665,0.00053927326,0.0008766798,0.0040461826,0.0028728135,0.0034647733,0.0016321253,0.0017359746,0.010274808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043405596,0.00056185375,0.0005425489,0.0019526408,0.0008261537,0.0015531479,0.0015982,0.0015023435,0.0020353836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002997971,0.0014357478,0.4896115,0.00019960766,0.00006907479,0.0017645343,0.0034564896,0.0046592373,0.0035725639,0.015487883,0.037727673,0.43901777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012559993,0.0035687124,0.56431085,0.001472697,0.0007749996,0.004322784,0.045068044,0.16133432,0.030049963,0.12497144,0.06257648,0.00029366196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017509213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0341048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017509213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013737809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008009626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04874295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3028589","doi":"10.1139/m86-170","title":"La question de la clémence à l'égard de la victime dans le jugement de responsabilité","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Canadian Journal of Microbiology","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009274753962893224,"score_gpt":0.21330167173967612,"score_spread":0.2040269177767829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3028589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8754867,0.020267759,0.0017344827,0.061103266,0.00081848225,0.000019973886,0.000117178184,0.000024326248,0.040427875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984991,0.0056180838,0.0004370731,0.0023951994,0.00039457032,0.00000615158,0.000016718457,0.0000068304325,0.006134348],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984938,0.0007121081,0.000046367888,0.00017770915,0.0002019607,0.0003680092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956,0.0018944639,0.0010379306,0.00023463283,0.0004900362,0.0007429706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028512515,0.00021617622,0.00034196532,0.0005262812,0.0018483311,0.0020862303,0.00076018256,0.0038283714,0.0074696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013176035,0.00027449967,0.0002232141,0.00025971432,0.0041830763,0.0018344992,0.0011540244,0.0019420007,0.0009158062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005661651,0.00046513413,0.6237937,0.00045313124,0.00010989405,0.015230366,0.07914253,0.00020100905,0.004383981,0.06495636,0.007915277,0.20278248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032587577,0.0014002931,0.53415585,0.0027495194,0.00016692009,0.082107596,0.16054216,0.0010687711,0.0034159278,0.030941531,0.18321119,0.00020756749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008509331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007906255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008509331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000954037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018114762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024988294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034982047","doi":"","title":"Protecting Auto Accident Victims from the UM/UIM Insurer Identity Crisis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Context (archaeology); Liability insurance; Liability; Underinsured; Compensation (psychology); Insurance policy; Accident (philosophy); Accident insurance; Actuarial science; Law; Finance; Political science; Health insurance","score_opus":0.02074723241738678,"score_gpt":0.22475106735309683,"score_spread":0.20400383493571006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034982047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5059479,0.003930151,0.0041591725,0.30596146,0.0020170042,0.00015175271,0.0001702283,0.0003099597,0.17735243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9238131,0.0017359346,0.0015186666,0.050867584,0.0009772305,0.000076101955,0.00011430653,0.00003496154,0.020862127],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817204,0.00045834182,0.000085956584,0.00015668324,0.0004153552,0.000711597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953407,0.0010903373,0.00078730634,0.000745589,0.00053653715,0.0014995957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003972296,0.00020379253,0.00025908684,0.00081444153,0.004344036,0.004007489,0.0011862105,0.0034966532,0.0069252886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015742525,0.00019858294,0.00037687944,0.00030976415,0.0017922446,0.0024114547,0.0076514184,0.004436553,0.0015251762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011414378,0.00056315825,0.14879532,0.00010668348,0.000046472655,0.0038363684,0.029015291,0.00027269355,0.0026157417,0.15605655,0.30869886,0.34987864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005755177,0.00042752762,0.119310215,0.0016822126,0.000098218414,0.0065475316,0.04524832,0.00391619,0.0031429578,0.03385394,0.7856238,0.00009152431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055670706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00635514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069252886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010207434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004366518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023167372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035799541","doi":"10.3917/reco.713.0429","title":"Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Testimony","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.07984520928179291,"score_gpt":0.22456256585706197,"score_spread":0.14471735657526907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035799541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15259409,0.005646944,0.16632986,0.0237073,0.00063680485,0.000359838,0.00040481836,0.00010123732,0.65021914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9449107,0.0016449956,0.010847591,0.0021354174,0.0004189296,0.00014968353,0.000082458464,0.000042043146,0.03976834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97460073,0.012788861,0.0012753973,0.002375929,0.0070278263,0.0019312309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9613384,0.02617356,0.0037941304,0.004489013,0.0032279477,0.0009770006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018578872,0.00058081344,0.00068013876,0.0015203411,0.002315535,0.006945617,0.0017738551,0.003683953,0.01754753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05971071,0.000543466,0.00082459726,0.0012321308,0.00726188,0.0057827653,0.0046023205,0.003740948,0.0020635328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063910535,0.000023492814,0.00051481545,0.00008215648,0.000021515967,0.00007749624,0.0006039528,0.001448486,0.00033616507,0.988846,0.001171991,0.0068101124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008380883,0.00016878906,0.0029415824,0.0002841621,0.00010852186,0.00033864524,0.0008724382,0.009551705,0.0016538759,0.94757074,0.036377177,0.00004853648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023981908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024777197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018578872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003936583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029701667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098255634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036047833","doi":"10.3917/reco.713.0403","title":"Effets stratégiques de la qualité des éléments de preuve dans une procédure accusatoire","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05243452184153143,"score_gpt":0.2487157029997513,"score_spread":0.19628118115821985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036047833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92174166,0.0020413827,0.012378725,0.0024446906,0.00017165534,0.00054954126,0.00029576255,0.00017979996,0.06019674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819725,0.00082415086,0.007981194,0.00044467853,0.000073672825,0.00029050518,0.00017847036,0.00006544329,0.008169419],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98335487,0.011242812,0.000919769,0.0010093775,0.002623491,0.0008497367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7346674,0.23011,0.017612142,0.00737182,0.0067543574,0.0034842275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015984084,0.00069072744,0.00055051665,0.001145408,0.0009743176,0.0034732954,0.0008174941,0.0022458772,0.01727746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10928412,0.00044138668,0.00087503024,0.0010640363,0.0015874397,0.0020426519,0.0010639187,0.0029608516,0.0019181299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03263541,0.008782139,0.15619853,0.0032392864,0.0019232685,0.00063099473,0.006913635,0.054246522,0.036035325,0.10222936,0.008042778,0.5891228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043408293,0.04260484,0.52428013,0.0031118204,0.004427295,0.0013906846,0.014545478,0.118047334,0.047664255,0.1716431,0.06730901,0.0006352597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002258234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002375434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01727746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017367641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002286679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084532976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038249924","doi":"10.7202/1070091ar","title":"La notion de causalité et le délit de négligence (common law) / responsabilité extracontractuelle du fait personnel (droit civil) au Canada : une étude en droit comparé","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Philosophy; Law; Commercial law","score_opus":0.01791062175287316,"score_gpt":0.21009578300609205,"score_spread":0.19218516125321888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038249924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66764677,0.020489162,0.047507383,0.022465281,0.0001687559,0.0001428741,0.0017091988,0.00012999261,0.23974057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98633355,0.0030446933,0.0027877036,0.0004542461,0.000030194074,0.00001544173,0.00016255531,0.00001896574,0.007152666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940719,0.00089529273,0.00017966185,0.00071495323,0.003259125,0.0008789942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844407,0.0070054345,0.0018693847,0.0006258613,0.0053725927,0.0006860633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041768616,0.00031393472,0.0005438114,0.0053849686,0.004144891,0.008052643,0.0012821546,0.0012173726,0.0065281936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018003812,0.00030508704,0.00071042386,0.0072916416,0.0116705205,0.0031368183,0.0021119416,0.0027294424,0.00017999469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057009755,0.000041814576,0.11815511,0.00026775277,0.00017356369,0.00037910737,0.013932331,0.0063695647,0.000522925,0.7977352,0.0032234776,0.05914206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036668604,0.00007484712,0.57983565,0.001339807,0.00037356303,0.0006398143,0.03231666,0.012994171,0.0015599969,0.24217585,0.1283856,0.00026735567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96147615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95734334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0713798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0713798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056005694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51789916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039104239","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3554101","title":"Does Limited Liability Matter? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Natural experiment; Natural (archaeology); Liability; Business; Environmental science; Mathematics; Geography; Accounting; Statistics","score_opus":0.02516228884766642,"score_gpt":0.22583816235198748,"score_spread":0.20067587350432106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039104239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95467937,0.0020116912,0.01691255,0.00775755,0.0007447152,0.001453062,0.0024576625,0.00011077229,0.0138725955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98884994,0.0003244683,0.002877459,0.0024121325,0.00027679658,0.00074672024,0.00055922277,0.000026034526,0.003927192],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9623352,0.029945761,0.0012476752,0.0038479618,0.001630012,0.0009933076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.47439033,0.4469325,0.044763826,0.027648624,0.0027515313,0.0035131841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.058225382,0.0008308621,0.0023743561,0.000525533,0.0017009897,0.0028424042,0.0025487356,0.0056013525,0.035358414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11219574,0.0007516841,0.0015236419,0.0006000112,0.0062501645,0.0038365873,0.0013199572,0.0028298225,0.0030441585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.31806067,0.074650116,0.2805685,0.005725198,0.014718128,0.006868953,0.011253324,0.006602048,0.0154398875,0.1753603,0.020971801,0.069781184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.12905972,0.06918947,0.40097797,0.0009104447,0.010095072,0.004015209,0.004613942,0.030084403,0.0073451158,0.3079703,0.03514667,0.00059172173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001746116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012914367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058225382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062270515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012736754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30792892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039383393","doi":"","title":"The role of law in technological transitions. A preliminary attempt to create a qualitative game theory perspective to aid in the understanding of goverment incentives for innovative companies","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Incentive; Game theory; Technological change; Law and economics; Business; Management science; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.059461842997324085,"score_gpt":0.29106311718670674,"score_spread":0.23160127418938264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039383393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16322887,0.0023890906,0.16826928,0.05866386,0.00031121584,0.00029601305,0.00031578654,0.000059433984,0.6064664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822709,0.00053590664,0.006314289,0.0010836555,0.000051374787,0.00010303832,0.000011979466,0.000007922264,0.009620958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825305,0.0009816388,0.00004291631,0.000118716736,0.00022521798,0.00037836743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950212,0.003980359,0.00029640982,0.00022344354,0.00026072696,0.00021777823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003601337,0.00017058235,0.00025711991,0.0006738793,0.0022239434,0.0054394607,0.000848552,0.0027768645,0.007008748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008591486,0.00024082167,0.00065217726,0.00070808455,0.009044014,0.0076809498,0.0018540977,0.002454131,0.00023172087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002427472,0.0000047413014,0.00010515412,0.0000067104347,6.2372965e-7,0.000016460419,0.0002319668,0.00047981468,0.00005512138,0.9984251,0.00014793905,0.0005239806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012601697,0.000021798876,0.0005570152,0.00003832318,0.0000042626534,0.00004138748,0.00079088367,0.0051881988,0.00016846883,0.9819011,0.011265519,0.00001039579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066001876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009559214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007008748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003284066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029284009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023827672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043111726","doi":"10.59962/9780774863599-015","title":"The Value of Class Actions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Compensation (psychology); Action (physics); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; State (computer science); Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03224608469896332,"score_gpt":0.17385669469307016,"score_spread":0.14161060999410685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043111726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11925484,0.0027744267,0.0440204,0.04447721,0.0005301915,0.0002576027,0.00021514132,0.00008216455,0.788388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771279,0.00045039185,0.0028839402,0.002848772,0.00030817362,0.00014256172,0.00003928056,0.000030401987,0.016168479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95772755,0.01800291,0.0013011887,0.004694738,0.013143308,0.0051303366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91704977,0.045042045,0.010085285,0.013095103,0.010362162,0.004365586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02935245,0.000529796,0.00097140303,0.0027168272,0.0077326214,0.011071628,0.002583235,0.0068926923,0.0118114455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085053615,0.00036483083,0.0006432732,0.0019447346,0.03697836,0.009722593,0.0067933192,0.0063565467,0.0010037042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031083848,0.000031728257,0.0044028633,0.000031482545,0.000028195378,0.00006513103,0.0012580337,0.0002955432,0.00011491504,0.97620016,0.0020054933,0.015535281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005997295,0.00012968433,0.013471214,0.0003180368,0.00009306135,0.00023345783,0.0036456315,0.0017658342,0.0006711756,0.9001479,0.07938916,0.0000747888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016222395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016753845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02935245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009554119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010891519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15523249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044704904","doi":"","title":"The Ontario Superior Court of Justice holds that information received by the Competition Authority at the proffer stage of its immunity and leniency programs is not protected from disclosure to other accused persons by settlement privilege (Nestlé Canada)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Competition (biology); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03350987002523396,"score_gpt":0.21211726670449912,"score_spread":0.17860739667926517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044704904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029613525,0.001269544,0.0014107,0.10256701,0.0026861564,0.0006545347,0.0079920115,0.00037303605,0.85343343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.084117524,0.0005909019,0.0014527913,0.044809744,0.0004187222,0.00020244974,0.0009962986,0.00012849848,0.86728305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98606956,0.00051446434,0.0006095684,0.0011637511,0.007268733,0.0043738745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97994554,0.003609889,0.0004942054,0.0009301675,0.01237598,0.0026441435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005225241,0.0006247528,0.0009538021,0.0020612834,0.030827943,0.011583907,0.003295201,0.015613997,0.03158325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019496204,0.00210891,0.0012510517,0.0025138836,0.0046584406,0.0024336386,0.0020665457,0.010392438,0.0064170263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008567828,0.00008614718,0.0071081296,0.00009100214,0.000039830313,0.00051357574,0.0030324706,0.00019802622,0.0008510689,0.19518009,0.78234565,0.010468426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088593886,0.000033552067,0.018035077,0.00015487324,0.00009617857,0.00010256421,0.0020692002,0.0007179744,0.0009882171,0.0066174916,0.97089845,0.00019780613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98878455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070437595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070437595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24898076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5110629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045198059","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2020.68.2.hosanna","title":"The Death of the Tariff: A Review of the Tax Court's Discretionary Approach to Costs Awards","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; Pace; Economic Justice; Tax reform; Jurisprudence; Administration (probate law); Law and economics; Business; Ad valorem tax; Law; Economics; Public economics; Political science","score_opus":0.038160423602167697,"score_gpt":0.21734540727601553,"score_spread":0.17918498367384783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045198059","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025840427,0.88248736,0.0029093735,0.04407562,0.0034058394,0.000042725274,0.00007401751,0.000034670007,0.064386286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050913606,0.89603174,0.0018161711,0.035130974,0.0059023597,0.000042994936,0.00011457729,0.00006187717,0.009985674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98401076,0.0030805366,0.0012586965,0.0012342652,0.009130976,0.0012848312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97612643,0.013689772,0.0013533799,0.00039037978,0.007879284,0.0005607258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012772432,0.0006121612,0.0010110154,0.009354481,0.005984833,0.011245171,0.0035941217,0.009991005,0.0021020682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0285733,0.00086919306,0.0011774416,0.012939978,0.015063555,0.0065872907,0.0017493989,0.010991079,0.00060861284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002227326,0.000082146275,0.0009800389,0.0022599453,0.000039264818,0.00043499807,0.0020378327,0.001347152,0.0002364447,0.66476786,0.11313175,0.21466027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009607565,0.000050689785,0.0039569777,0.0065152403,0.000048805523,0.000542386,0.0009743834,0.00053584366,0.00016711104,0.026200766,0.9609111,0.00008707623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38415876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47910908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61584127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044087786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05672645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76384544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046006574","doi":"","title":"Incentivized Torts: An Empirical Analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Causation; Liability; Strict liability; Commit; Actuarial science; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.030410752165161568,"score_gpt":0.2447872489471057,"score_spread":0.21437649678194415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046006574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9583146,0.0035452954,0.009734442,0.0023956138,0.00006441849,0.0008279635,0.0014631381,0.000085614854,0.023568869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922362,0.0009972018,0.0023037924,0.00046425447,0.00008977263,0.00046287823,0.0007954757,0.000023035407,0.002627268],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823945,0.009901249,0.0010176279,0.0018433945,0.004011365,0.00083180866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6702913,0.2674987,0.041332982,0.012461489,0.006656473,0.0017590368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020052128,0.0006406533,0.0012326345,0.0032998242,0.002307324,0.0028498487,0.002373883,0.0025742976,0.013684412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1041427,0.0004835252,0.0013444474,0.0036979548,0.003745264,0.0036997648,0.0020773239,0.0037504593,0.0011414748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027445105,0.013563482,0.61607796,0.001788002,0.0024721837,0.0024247146,0.00535475,0.015077666,0.0018145062,0.20034185,0.022098647,0.116241805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020164163,0.0057381145,0.7744934,0.001146968,0.0018491893,0.002095374,0.0104835015,0.061932344,0.0030803776,0.08012622,0.05676888,0.0002690557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035624616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027282487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020052128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023988204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014572532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106047034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046534339","doi":"10.29173/alr2601","title":"Drop Dead or a Slow Death? An Analysis of Rule 4.33 of the Alberta Rules of Court","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Jurisprudence; Resolution (logic); Law; Drop (telecommunication); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04662218564865175,"score_gpt":0.24967946929253537,"score_spread":0.20305728364388362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046534339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7059515,0.0027465497,0.0038326369,0.008268266,0.00015027927,0.00028210168,0.001613168,0.00007168326,0.2770837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759127,0.00061685866,0.00074806827,0.0011261048,0.000049773953,0.00004939622,0.0004719144,0.000023900328,0.021001173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924493,0.0011402454,0.0001353257,0.00052935444,0.0038738644,0.0018718463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889866,0.0047277166,0.0015311566,0.00051292847,0.0036137537,0.00062791153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056029567,0.0002784894,0.00078646065,0.0028464173,0.0036100722,0.0057933438,0.0022863192,0.0015588121,0.008413033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015879469,0.00034065955,0.0008063021,0.0036332426,0.0038983335,0.0013059537,0.001260338,0.0031412481,0.00054279406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042696463,0.00027487878,0.07552509,0.00028770696,0.0002569912,0.0017968761,0.006639809,0.02488477,0.001290273,0.79368526,0.04729771,0.047633644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031209498,0.0005065469,0.47149602,0.0006511706,0.0007442146,0.0004707481,0.02623684,0.07047502,0.0015314613,0.2717497,0.15544681,0.000379326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79837465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84664536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20162535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028949829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0278955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40562546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3047811450","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v9n1p72","title":"An Introduction to the System of Appeals in Iran, Egypt and France","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Order (exchange); Business","score_opus":0.08184473820365429,"score_gpt":0.30996900872988553,"score_spread":0.22812427052623124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3047811450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24844211,0.042653315,0.03093856,0.017799124,0.0008744658,0.0003893448,0.0020938239,0.00030275105,0.65650654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9081218,0.013750033,0.02277594,0.00094181707,0.00081163546,0.0001594174,0.0008875416,0.00007220001,0.05247963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986952,0.00058516115,0.00009301389,0.000101620186,0.000263806,0.00026124506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990048,0.00042354103,0.00018060401,0.00006246736,0.00026534311,0.00006321003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001571214,0.0002780482,0.00025471312,0.0050054565,0.0017522092,0.004125375,0.000737033,0.000896967,0.011265075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002801095,0.00023910619,0.0008264108,0.004970266,0.002264167,0.0016486783,0.00088346883,0.0010808356,0.0008829912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003063725,0.00007726585,0.013059912,0.00013293145,0.000020260532,0.00048009757,0.0020744905,0.0041912035,0.0003448167,0.9157767,0.012224942,0.051586717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039519768,0.00022279013,0.13282824,0.00034409764,0.000046743862,0.0015662356,0.0073024756,0.013564875,0.0004796393,0.19105014,0.6523973,0.0001581234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097393066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06120321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097393066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010042456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027948883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19365233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048873828","doi":"","title":"The Bedford Trilogy and the Shifting Foundations of Vertical Stare Decisis: Emancipation from Judicial Restraint?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trilogy; Emancipation; Law; Political science; Sociology; History; Art history; Politics","score_opus":0.03823562525356799,"score_gpt":0.24134121238245249,"score_spread":0.2031055871288845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048873828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16458401,0.007825387,0.05249875,0.14888003,0.0009720488,0.00012567728,0.00012983425,0.00011549845,0.6248688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600998,0.001666684,0.004131218,0.009817128,0.00021009379,0.0000314588,0.000031545835,0.000043770247,0.023968307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99307054,0.0017084073,0.000240358,0.00091627374,0.0019189537,0.0021455076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931825,0.0026806782,0.00087786105,0.00095171254,0.0015535214,0.0007537287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007040909,0.0002597792,0.0004602076,0.001473976,0.008803084,0.009727056,0.001916003,0.005576521,0.005790416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019545108,0.0004965821,0.00057238044,0.0015351037,0.05479825,0.00970086,0.0053930325,0.009377008,0.00075616944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052705373,0.0000035069224,0.0005782054,0.00000811088,0.0000016569147,0.00008190933,0.0031043433,0.00008349491,0.000056190653,0.98848665,0.0014715474,0.006119049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000241764,0.00004897517,0.009365613,0.00047914154,0.000023411887,0.00044518444,0.01557166,0.0014127459,0.00096907286,0.74148685,0.23003641,0.00013681172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24071382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32134426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24071382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018562268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027599933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47862548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W307672313","doi":"","title":"More Access to Less Justice: Efficiency, Proportionality and Costs in Canadian Civil Justice Reform","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Interim; Civil procedure; Proportionality (law); Adversarial system; Political science; Dispute resolution; Law reform; Procedural justice; Law and economics; Public administration; Economics; Public economics; Business; Law","score_opus":0.02480150611896072,"score_gpt":0.269124108427707,"score_spread":0.24432260230874628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W307672313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25081515,0.008032935,0.022698162,0.110507876,0.0002998354,0.00022804922,0.00040569392,0.00013664743,0.6068756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97997457,0.001323414,0.0020031058,0.0016776597,0.000113393384,0.000029629784,0.000035578127,0.000027421107,0.014815175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98377335,0.0027487269,0.00034508435,0.00090945547,0.007609499,0.004613762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863651,0.004675801,0.0012443298,0.0013055746,0.004825168,0.0015840329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007484108,0.00045235895,0.0008448158,0.0030986553,0.008611785,0.01084877,0.0020809805,0.0024245381,0.009764685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036492087,0.00039873898,0.0007343045,0.0043115527,0.023512453,0.006511416,0.005022539,0.004239616,0.00025241356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022938233,0.000015598138,0.0018865698,0.00003844484,0.000011991635,0.000038569146,0.0011986684,0.002771838,0.00008010851,0.97903,0.0021051196,0.012800206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009314611,0.00005470338,0.03234345,0.00028272782,0.00013669438,0.000102153586,0.003591575,0.011037507,0.0006649482,0.8350879,0.116459325,0.00014587054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96314305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95860726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83631957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1636804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1100137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9700122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081952975","doi":"10.1093/rfs/hhab026","title":"How Should Performance Signals Affect Contracts?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Financial Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Business; Psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.08886434309171484,"score_gpt":0.27987627276177646,"score_spread":0.19101192967006161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081952975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51785105,0.028607417,0.18642996,0.06572023,0.0009988862,0.0001686426,0.00054888596,0.0003276037,0.19934726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99136895,0.0023289581,0.0029588945,0.0013424506,0.00033037056,0.000021292206,0.000023870169,0.000022732282,0.0016024932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98888105,0.0067647835,0.0005151625,0.0010455431,0.0021620905,0.00063132634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89156455,0.07402958,0.021904657,0.004182753,0.0067055044,0.0016129302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014363988,0.00041056314,0.0007098801,0.0013943844,0.00095808954,0.006109268,0.0009979426,0.0045693726,0.0047351685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071404964,0.0005333031,0.00044772108,0.0015459388,0.005744508,0.005984646,0.0013123237,0.0033890826,0.0007603626],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023362135,0.0001551232,0.009629587,0.00032858757,0.00012216864,0.0002078682,0.00046155526,0.015946575,0.002299415,0.9197131,0.0034107845,0.047491577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081554885,0.0002207716,0.012571027,0.00037489532,0.00010134021,0.00018939778,0.00036943454,0.021697713,0.0022209515,0.9481688,0.013911634,0.0000924755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009779931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046477915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014363988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026336573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001164006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07596493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082785568","doi":"10.11606/t.2.2019.tde-14082020-010154","title":"Análise das relações contratuais fáticas à luz do direito de empresa","year":2019,"lang":"pt","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WiLAN (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; German; General partnership; Database transaction; Law; Public service; Common law; Business; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02134821054354526,"score_gpt":0.25025455872461544,"score_spread":0.22890634818107017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082785568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9191727,0.0012176501,0.0031981238,0.0008076424,0.00010548761,0.00012938253,0.0013590003,0.00014545149,0.0738646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98948276,0.0005229792,0.0022897539,0.000050051276,0.000058207635,0.000070471964,0.00058890175,0.00004951852,0.0068873893],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993576,0.001467334,0.0006119267,0.0012352327,0.0025761407,0.00053341244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9532884,0.028013183,0.0067359637,0.0034091177,0.0077632205,0.0007901172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055382573,0.00033832988,0.00070651906,0.006952636,0.0024141772,0.0032801614,0.0011662607,0.00092718226,0.015077485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048924953,0.0003723117,0.0005843424,0.006275567,0.002536326,0.0025924954,0.0025442748,0.0010976869,0.00170946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030987003,0.00010910602,0.6968052,0.0010517264,0.00025808395,0.0018058456,0.08438272,0.001279323,0.0031099159,0.032805577,0.0066146087,0.17146803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008696367,0.000177408,0.8463321,0.0005165544,0.00016215166,0.0014234307,0.0750694,0.0024659925,0.0016840961,0.0037100222,0.06838788,0.000062214094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027276192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03761918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027276192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024401671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018421832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054234862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083830392","doi":"","title":"Complementarity of Auction and Continuous Markets: The Case of the German Spot Market for Quarter Hourly Contracts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transforming Energy Markets,41st IAEE International Conference,Jun 10-13, 2018","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spot market; German; Spot contract; Quarter (Canadian coin); Economics; Complementarity (molecular biology); Financial economics; Business; Geography; Futures contract; Engineering","score_opus":0.0335237432488529,"score_gpt":0.24522125993334776,"score_spread":0.21169751668449485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083830392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69554794,0.0020637175,0.069628604,0.00914464,0.00014180923,0.0001742298,0.0004037248,0.00016897099,0.22272636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884233,0.00022144178,0.0020068076,0.0001601031,0.00006941027,0.000029812416,0.000035899713,0.000017760127,0.009035453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971413,0.001092591,0.00008648717,0.00030356538,0.0004705171,0.00090547977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98413575,0.011865718,0.0011761494,0.00095817435,0.00085759687,0.001006628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042460687,0.00045703157,0.0022335302,0.0010100058,0.0029116122,0.007825927,0.0018635606,0.006030595,0.02078047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016868668,0.0007870999,0.0017541861,0.0011709968,0.0053795394,0.00877484,0.0032302635,0.0039580325,0.0006587646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020405518,0.00008501647,0.0008096434,0.000051385574,0.000026605325,0.00080576807,0.0002953166,0.013538534,0.0002569759,0.97961503,0.0018441832,0.0024674733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033817274,0.00009641462,0.0014313811,0.000036719244,0.00006632005,0.00032858763,0.0006725952,0.11005405,0.0002462905,0.883554,0.0031108763,0.00006470879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017824596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013420084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02078047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029270172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039014604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06951761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087164928","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6419","title":"Improving Access to Justice: Do Contingency Fees Really Work?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Panacea (medicine); Contingency; Economic Justice; Payment; Work (physics); Praise; Business; Contingency plan; Law and economics; Law; Public relations; Political science; Economics; Finance; Management; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.06255586856556417,"score_gpt":0.2736351138590107,"score_spread":0.21107924529344652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087164928","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05859929,0.024713464,0.011376761,0.70648444,0.0030853245,0.00015988808,0.00061953464,0.00023809397,0.19472319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90887994,0.0135506345,0.0046169865,0.049048815,0.003073116,0.00011836946,0.00016905185,0.00018281078,0.020360317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914535,0.0038115673,0.00030670283,0.00058300607,0.0022318822,0.001613323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97195506,0.015498894,0.0031788158,0.0017306615,0.0024800135,0.0051565864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058446415,0.00034928307,0.00086936745,0.0014480879,0.002145304,0.012203821,0.0016527835,0.0054677003,0.024429975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054908294,0.00025312838,0.0006771539,0.0018513923,0.0087479055,0.016108261,0.005009956,0.005184578,0.002466488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031338522,0.0005168246,0.016923767,0.00075354177,0.00016250918,0.00031488267,0.0020175884,0.0020021014,0.00042722613,0.60448027,0.12191295,0.25017497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001659688,0.0004948472,0.0198727,0.0015351098,0.00017498965,0.00048295647,0.003913707,0.0031219728,0.0009012387,0.8026846,0.16652408,0.00012787385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059931213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064939614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024429975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004002617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004911207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08172643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087495322","doi":"","title":"Review of Irit Samet, Equity: Conscience Comes to Market","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Conscience; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.038812645556198525,"score_gpt":0.2575624921355139,"score_spread":0.2187498465793154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087495322","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007377406,0.959754,0.00012744269,0.03179968,0.0045968494,0.0000044458834,0.00005645568,0.00000490519,0.0035824704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0053840233,0.9195831,0.00019156469,0.058087885,0.0141546205,0.00002693812,0.00012347521,0.000030320836,0.0024180347],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99484104,0.0017742544,0.0006938101,0.00053748157,0.001866406,0.00028698109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96802884,0.021612035,0.0019107872,0.0007549372,0.0069136447,0.00077978295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073637553,0.0007517572,0.0020696328,0.00621587,0.0012183075,0.0049230945,0.0016604316,0.0052616755,0.0070191636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041127224,0.0005147127,0.00077044696,0.007217191,0.0038338562,0.0074654683,0.0024032167,0.006689153,0.002706663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072208844,0.000018346356,0.00031109535,0.00764245,0.00012418319,0.000102971615,0.0004031698,0.00013500311,0.00010162715,0.04361823,0.75553304,0.19193771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018066887,0.000026495687,0.001072052,0.012635126,0.00008665426,0.00020065803,0.00017243138,0.00003495307,0.000064672684,0.010318476,0.9753484,0.00002197609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068149054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010578461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073637553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004441657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01180997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038943708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092396186","doi":"10.1017/s1352325220000154","title":"PROCEDURAL RIGHTS AND FACTUAL ACCURACY","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Obligation; Political science; Law; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Morality; Settlement (finance); State (computer science); Politics; Business; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.026384292201385932,"score_gpt":0.21264771308212005,"score_spread":0.1862634208807341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092396186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072635114,0.0050243926,0.29837793,0.058001973,0.0006867298,0.0002957641,0.00065256684,0.00025657887,0.564069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9485598,0.0014698019,0.030291794,0.0032605808,0.0008229311,0.00029158097,0.0002556989,0.00012098558,0.014926803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94586647,0.026774202,0.0048430683,0.0054811155,0.014138134,0.0028969091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73971826,0.16912888,0.02601139,0.040295295,0.02193505,0.0029111581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051868342,0.00044848892,0.0009429056,0.0038042665,0.0032759504,0.012381423,0.002524052,0.0050867996,0.013229581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17930472,0.0006093906,0.0009611237,0.002608533,0.036033623,0.014805418,0.0072283824,0.0056851846,0.0015870187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007970006,0.000009597741,0.0005140996,0.000019884308,0.000009704284,0.000022791775,0.0004858651,0.0005523332,0.00005678878,0.9929213,0.00066737516,0.0047323806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012535316,0.000008759127,0.0005865637,0.00009922282,0.0000111024665,0.000048908652,0.00016961002,0.00095340476,0.0001769324,0.9875414,0.010379174,0.000012581606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033166662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018364674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051868342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046551498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058994666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27430928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094000370","doi":"10.1177/0093854820964822","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue: Empirical Investigations of Strengths and Desistance from Criminal Offending","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminal Justice and Behavior","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Psychology; Empirical research","score_opus":0.0815974360166622,"score_gpt":0.2868639766524889,"score_spread":0.20526654063582672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094000370","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013387334,0.07424616,0.0031298175,0.11528752,0.7791242,0.000120445206,0.004258265,0.0002491124,0.022245815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048512393,0.029377164,0.001272644,0.031761006,0.8920903,0.00021254459,0.003112617,0.00037665112,0.03694586],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978104,0.0006131806,0.00030538495,0.00047374066,0.00061508495,0.00018229822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95351726,0.032922376,0.0017103627,0.0019076846,0.0070510693,0.002891313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004268818,0.0021233975,0.0027514896,0.0070982194,0.0021804962,0.009252412,0.0026571823,0.0058943564,0.07005722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027442615,0.00075932784,0.0020851793,0.0056240777,0.0017168745,0.0053176377,0.0026800118,0.009175721,0.02537502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013521383,0.000039396386,0.00040568484,0.00016334224,0.000017127124,0.000020776144,0.000025512869,0.000038189533,0.000028399058,0.0011796823,0.9895359,0.008532411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069450354,0.00013607694,0.015122805,0.0016754111,0.0001505999,0.00033031855,0.0004934047,0.0006824031,0.00014085125,0.017530277,0.96359223,0.00007624284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029638205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005907929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07005722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014413696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027421294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23436475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095126530","doi":"10.3968/11864","title":"An Analysis of Prosecutorial Accountability Mechanism for Wrongful Cases","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Misconduct; Mechanism (biology); Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Criminal justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04662385971017089,"score_gpt":0.2536146361525696,"score_spread":0.2069907764423987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095126530","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28343683,0.0032013461,0.52160543,0.01932501,0.00055832654,0.0007581323,0.0007159605,0.0007045454,0.16969442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97269934,0.0006468309,0.010337023,0.0003598006,0.00026907382,0.00013430687,0.000103642975,0.000043507272,0.015406284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99093574,0.002961522,0.0004561815,0.00095808425,0.0023318392,0.0023565195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9508656,0.022557741,0.011546511,0.005065946,0.008013996,0.0019501871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012066239,0.00048828445,0.00097613496,0.0034885777,0.0019675854,0.005011506,0.002966093,0.0031469886,0.018109037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04299722,0.00050873274,0.001855202,0.0022022098,0.0031324227,0.007588832,0.001955692,0.0029812255,0.001406454],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004851787,0.00006588439,0.004562057,0.00005289962,0.000033690012,0.00025999645,0.00036916105,0.00683554,0.000518648,0.9715415,0.0031455792,0.012566428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008382231,0.000108661734,0.010601177,0.00012690356,0.00014979855,0.0007811206,0.0006078311,0.1229168,0.0014387375,0.84984636,0.013243904,0.00009482004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00525229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022998904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051334146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005268941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06381315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097982080","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3723985","title":"Reputational versus Beckerian Sanctions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Business; Criminology; Economics","score_opus":0.03361528668983237,"score_gpt":0.2221166884443337,"score_spread":0.1885014017545013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097982080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3099442,0.0046069226,0.051239632,0.025575092,0.0009159657,0.000103506594,0.00046156626,0.00031606603,0.60683703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805834,0.0005284185,0.001097585,0.00066255586,0.00040568996,0.000016716358,0.0000250965,0.000019081108,0.016661387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951702,0.0017288169,0.00023638272,0.0006375936,0.0012307769,0.000996148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783689,0.010114863,0.005567792,0.002310015,0.0019768274,0.0016617102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061219106,0.00029724344,0.00076540135,0.001473574,0.0017462864,0.0063047884,0.0013345794,0.003998039,0.022092713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032111205,0.0002568979,0.00046686587,0.00097384385,0.0042827,0.004435807,0.0015271469,0.002797594,0.0016406283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006365116,0.000045611625,0.0010892015,0.000042260766,0.000018095841,0.000033378517,0.0001159507,0.0011238332,0.00008690777,0.984444,0.0029555517,0.009981592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013088966,0.00013330202,0.0069221444,0.000109432614,0.00006766508,0.00014858712,0.00035756786,0.00818252,0.00024078079,0.97680014,0.006857657,0.000049338923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019230866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039258674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022092713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002445033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018100414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073907435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3103222853","doi":"","title":"Lawyers and Court Representation of Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument [OPCA] Litigants in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Law; Representation (politics); Orthodoxy; Political science; Ideology; Function (biology); Sociology; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.014055657144292761,"score_gpt":0.21301809472008154,"score_spread":0.19896243757578877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3103222853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95315623,0.00045469668,0.00019952854,0.0060081384,0.0000414949,0.00007723745,0.0002485298,0.000021717204,0.03979255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881859,0.00021280561,0.00010914856,0.00063603796,0.0000090241765,0.000011445387,0.00008355313,0.000009191191,0.0107428655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959686,0.0005008882,0.00011324851,0.0003727066,0.0014207249,0.0016239228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860409,0.0028523954,0.0019335876,0.00029026545,0.004509157,0.0043736165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019295528,0.0001366023,0.0003671983,0.0032867081,0.01773002,0.0071092304,0.0018950016,0.0021063024,0.014496724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018522808,0.00034989344,0.00023960185,0.003942213,0.0039910763,0.0011974496,0.0028294,0.0023804938,0.00053818076],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034939995,0.00095477287,0.4613365,0.00020278002,0.00010322183,0.0044073765,0.25669506,0.0016274414,0.0024501556,0.09260326,0.07659191,0.10267816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006139305,0.00010378704,0.63839054,0.00030519257,0.000059884416,0.00066490093,0.2135951,0.0042155697,0.0006177268,0.004955997,0.13689476,0.00013510871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98654014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99480903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09243173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09243173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08404883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67064226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W310566546","doi":"","title":"The Problematic Delta Test for Dividend Equivalents","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tax Notes","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Delta; Equivalent; Test (biology); Dividend; Econometrics; Economics; Engineering; Geology; Finance; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.10050985825480431,"score_gpt":0.2594452275892684,"score_spread":0.15893536933446412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W310566546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5616259,0.002511535,0.33526137,0.020334175,0.0017891794,0.00019240967,0.0026731,0.0009081503,0.07470421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808445,0.00018885311,0.011585238,0.0010369451,0.00045365025,0.000095387724,0.0007877026,0.000111634996,0.0048960014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9703653,0.018743059,0.0017949984,0.0040080165,0.004033896,0.0010547603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6413829,0.32436574,0.0062345383,0.017801816,0.0077666035,0.002448467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029227661,0.00081203104,0.002396642,0.0040748836,0.0020946555,0.003951594,0.0038026494,0.0022235815,0.019695967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29560208,0.00050414726,0.0013308205,0.003972949,0.0059336196,0.008156218,0.0044433842,0.0056339316,0.002050086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017335007,0.00031347532,0.14723231,0.00048855174,0.0008408154,0.002222533,0.0010981963,0.0067467573,0.00084611913,0.600088,0.03670145,0.20168827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003659124,0.000345943,0.027654354,0.0002018243,0.00019392378,0.0013212622,0.0014406156,0.053915225,0.001741334,0.9031085,0.009642259,0.00006882014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016068575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013432027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029227661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009791035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00199085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15457249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107191469","doi":"10.32995/s0718-80722012293","title":"GOOD FAITH IN CIVIL LAW SYSTEMS. A LEGAL-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista chilena de derecho privado","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Persona; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0186739016337296,"score_gpt":0.2266559953510122,"score_spread":0.2079820937172826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107191469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02802479,0.02381852,0.13297442,0.13058725,0.0009495766,0.00012464194,0.00020712678,0.00011968902,0.68319404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94245785,0.0063540135,0.014786866,0.005258279,0.0009931849,0.00014133332,0.00008191182,0.00006693843,0.029859595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99410844,0.0025245342,0.0002291248,0.0007004501,0.0017473662,0.0006901802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864531,0.0077954293,0.0015221429,0.0018455202,0.00147746,0.00090628123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008227809,0.0005219036,0.00062825833,0.0033144145,0.005539421,0.011460313,0.0013819587,0.005263181,0.006062255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014735991,0.00047864413,0.00069652067,0.0022951837,0.04749759,0.013992051,0.004902993,0.006008902,0.0008280819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.731639e-7,0.0000022298686,0.000041452102,0.0000042172774,8.543326e-7,0.000007889279,0.00017509819,0.00012694883,0.000005466303,0.9983278,0.00043119772,0.0008762716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015800887,0.000003344429,0.00008222549,0.000029050045,0.0000011702357,0.000015347941,0.00017776787,0.00039536422,0.000015940108,0.9868341,0.012440558,0.0000036368442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005828469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038097515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011460313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007946244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045684054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05765426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110903145","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3740954","title":"Predicting Litigation Risk via Machine Learning","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Computer science; Business; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.013045981585205774,"score_gpt":0.1891016134107482,"score_spread":0.1760556318255424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110903145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8974456,0.0020471925,0.08826278,0.0036229414,0.00018865583,0.00012327771,0.0022958473,0.00071426097,0.005299475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909999,0.000273136,0.006239464,0.00009125565,0.00015963348,0.000029273759,0.0010557274,0.00001234335,0.0011392612],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901676,0.00036902665,0.0000880918,0.00021398847,0.00017399313,0.00013811918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97941816,0.017006671,0.001651201,0.00044920185,0.0010301747,0.00044466511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028257968,0.0007592468,0.00089746545,0.0036912619,0.00046734538,0.0018279594,0.0008676494,0.0018767606,0.0033446073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017131574,0.00040856822,0.00068901404,0.0015233641,0.00040040395,0.0018646775,0.00059926446,0.0017863307,0.0012306859],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005028881,0.0017821639,0.31175607,0.00009525731,0.00028151472,0.0002297851,0.000059317936,0.52882195,0.00060818135,0.0043338933,0.011257649,0.14027137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010262114,0.00003488139,0.0069476655,0.000009505025,0.000010453933,0.00002093581,0.000010046241,0.9880371,0.00014530255,0.0046113394,0.00015612431,0.0000064390565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006055303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007009761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006055303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001017374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009580481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014944434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112343099","doi":"10.7202/1072090ar","title":"L’équité salariale pour les femmes au Québec : un enjeu toujours d’actualité","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Politique et Sociétés","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14737848547209556,"score_gpt":0.3389649658351944,"score_spread":0.19158648036309886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112343099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4935233,0.019704904,0.0066247354,0.20677209,0.00067652966,0.000090630165,0.0009568816,0.00006428394,0.27158666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482359,0.004648931,0.0012967207,0.006233416,0.00012617625,0.000028115679,0.0001372122,0.000014765847,0.039278805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982095,0.0004905273,0.000041860636,0.00017176695,0.00062552514,0.00046074882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961361,0.0009958259,0.00042828222,0.00016773642,0.0017827504,0.0004891365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024402705,0.0002739535,0.00026986352,0.0011780637,0.007224192,0.003556963,0.0007437539,0.001403598,0.010251872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00726011,0.00015547259,0.00019866854,0.0013257553,0.004107463,0.0014061609,0.0014040953,0.0021876197,0.0003748451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012363157,0.00013845722,0.14960079,0.00056504743,0.000098017066,0.00102807,0.062090293,0.0019808528,0.0022962491,0.49692637,0.0835058,0.20164642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026169224,0.00012839072,0.40915406,0.0016181016,0.000084170664,0.00037188342,0.057513364,0.0028394184,0.0013101663,0.026993774,0.49980655,0.00015399203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9540718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9813291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04592818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031296287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03732313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22707146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113278404","doi":"10.1017/cls.2020.9","title":"Access to Justice and the Limits of Environmental Class Actions in Ontario","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Environmental justice; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Axiom; Politics; Action (physics); Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Public economics; Economics; Law; Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; State (computer science); Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.044551468429847134,"score_gpt":0.22988352545141344,"score_spread":0.1853320570215663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113278404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6863472,0.0016824006,0.0017467424,0.018169966,0.000039859482,0.0001349413,0.0005571515,0.000022915936,0.29129887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921004,0.00032676657,0.00015872203,0.00030496245,0.000009895088,0.000014044053,0.000033680746,0.0000037648604,0.007047628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932318,0.0005176181,0.00018745828,0.00046347262,0.0025434017,0.0030563343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99027187,0.0029534055,0.0014170742,0.000482517,0.0031534024,0.0017216123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023810973,0.00013948065,0.00039016973,0.0016787747,0.01556719,0.007741565,0.0014597496,0.0019362469,0.0073758317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011246967,0.00032253057,0.00028908066,0.0022662436,0.010129637,0.00207909,0.003637718,0.0018404146,0.0001869529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016497745,0.00008728093,0.10632681,0.00020984584,0.000063556334,0.0014235808,0.046342444,0.0023762973,0.001472828,0.7903042,0.012572681,0.038655516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009837873,0.00013133342,0.43318802,0.0007995866,0.00017915972,0.0007028311,0.08267419,0.0067565306,0.0015815516,0.13054122,0.3431038,0.00024334136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9850684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12641576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12641576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10794243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9172148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113312401","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v14n2p12","title":"Research on the Application of the Crime of Falsely Issuing Special VAT Invoices in China","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Invoice; Conviction; China; Identification (biology); Subject (documents); Actuarial science; Business; Law; Political science; Accounting; Computer science","score_opus":0.07756518386357221,"score_gpt":0.291415361431993,"score_spread":0.21385017756842079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113312401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98836285,0.00041311115,0.0013958614,0.0016821924,0.000029502597,0.000037286456,0.00009328582,0.000009037282,0.007976889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984621,0.00024398071,0.00018638039,0.000057376554,0.000012484231,0.000006799052,0.00003339482,0.0000014360185,0.0009961027],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963483,0.0010781062,0.00031797722,0.0004785521,0.0010842785,0.0006928266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916373,0.0028460098,0.002793489,0.0003857942,0.0017880945,0.00054928294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030762162,0.00022373784,0.0005051897,0.0028265065,0.002330508,0.0021568306,0.0012741848,0.000901223,0.0032905121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012815065,0.0003018153,0.000533688,0.0021931566,0.001767247,0.0019645642,0.0012127479,0.0017452453,0.00011884915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008531481,0.00017622916,0.8715047,0.0002498471,0.00016207641,0.0022198616,0.0114587275,0.00395522,0.0005842649,0.07662652,0.0034487662,0.029528486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015097775,0.00012294351,0.92839473,0.00020951845,0.00021523001,0.0010401655,0.019456394,0.029456228,0.0008683362,0.013965692,0.006176705,0.000079025565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09891324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10851437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09891324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004663022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062108263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.196675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117872414","doi":"10.4324/9781315185408-21","title":"Access to Courts by Public Interest Groups Seeking to Challenge Government Decisions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Public interest; Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Business; Law","score_opus":0.12589219538149948,"score_gpt":0.24862489524868164,"score_spread":0.12273269986718216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117872414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008799576,0.00386177,0.0020633244,0.009708221,0.00022827387,0.000029699857,0.000025089459,0.000041870215,0.9752421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2749427,0.006406963,0.0015935589,0.008368193,0.0007983733,0.00006184959,0.000075930024,0.00008218477,0.7076702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658704,0.0011347289,0.00007193853,0.00037690057,0.0010654212,0.0007639534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687517,0.0017697319,0.00015551504,0.0003317227,0.00052620145,0.00034158162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023059424,0.00025810755,0.00033163727,0.001018813,0.005356534,0.01070821,0.0010246631,0.003512134,0.033108126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004846122,0.00033417437,0.00030879639,0.0012565941,0.007578414,0.005152056,0.0042958213,0.0051893387,0.00465971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000648994,0.00003397244,0.00045704126,0.000030113191,0.000003231467,0.0001689631,0.007156798,0.00019488232,0.0003139384,0.9192317,0.03820044,0.03420234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008223463,0.000020331208,0.0014927716,0.00017285995,0.0000055897076,0.0002520161,0.0031171578,0.00039733908,0.00025371864,0.09757141,0.8966934,0.000015134729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023914378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06264249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033108126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071352925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070143756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11075771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118825656","doi":"","title":"Can Recidivism be Prevented from Behind Bars? Evidence from a Behavioral Program","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Random assignment; Sentence; Psychology; Propensity score matching; Rehabilitation; Reentry; Actuarial science; Criminology; Computer science; Business; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.10969599278825919,"score_gpt":0.33509711612506005,"score_spread":0.22540112333680085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118825656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96974313,0.0019755897,0.00037837314,0.008414863,0.00008165774,0.00010111311,0.0039802273,0.00003884726,0.015286176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932981,0.0010614631,0.00013320816,0.0010115958,0.000055146756,0.000040384723,0.0013383045,0.000010942873,0.0030508786],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965862,0.0012982725,0.00012667783,0.00045286532,0.0006656848,0.00087038375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724752,0.009272464,0.010171759,0.0019067284,0.0030714835,0.003102282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028982232,0.00028223044,0.00062332203,0.0010257101,0.0015628345,0.0012685951,0.002270393,0.0015702634,0.01146396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02066609,0.00028206204,0.0008243093,0.0015385477,0.0012965847,0.00058842334,0.00092069514,0.002106528,0.0010741017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001327547,0.0015010557,0.936004,0.00022632345,0.0006390639,0.00019199509,0.0011406481,0.0010026583,0.00015907951,0.0017054921,0.01360924,0.042492833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009757463,0.00023957173,0.99387896,0.00011813198,0.00026429025,0.00002777092,0.0011154553,0.0007428348,0.000104916275,0.00029342333,0.0031038933,0.000013025196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7915602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81464136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7915602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045235357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074080857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4193347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120800865","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Look at Vicarious Liability for Intentional Wrongs and Abuses of Power in Canadian Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Wrongdoing; Delict; Law; Common law; Legal liability; Strict liability; Liability; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Scope (computer science); Tort; Comparative law; Sociology; Public law; Private law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.056015194758792575,"score_gpt":0.24285554969351694,"score_spread":0.18684035493472437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120800865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30011746,0.022563111,0.0019900526,0.033321265,0.0002490893,0.00008917648,0.00050053996,0.0000478023,0.6411215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97729194,0.005763534,0.00051236636,0.0016297512,0.000036302812,0.000011302168,0.00011581556,0.000014863902,0.014624106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942311,0.0006757695,0.000105114304,0.00024893077,0.0024619412,0.0022771046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916865,0.0019437128,0.00059698755,0.00022888395,0.0045777075,0.0009660639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003095125,0.00026429907,0.0004898375,0.011213917,0.018198857,0.0076897433,0.0019419879,0.0023485995,0.010027723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012841738,0.00027059368,0.0005980383,0.01067666,0.010561261,0.0028685466,0.0023182186,0.0020415015,0.00029642278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004777641,0.000055341225,0.026392685,0.00023903817,0.000036754518,0.0012711863,0.04500875,0.0013834614,0.00040720205,0.85066617,0.02680064,0.04769094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003258905,0.00005497103,0.32265812,0.0012415015,0.00015205995,0.0013706594,0.1233488,0.0027637586,0.0004014461,0.055650294,0.49207255,0.00025329055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.994361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1660013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1660013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13694093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96732026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121136156","doi":"","title":"Labor Market and Access to Justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Labour economics; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Split labor market theory; Economics; Labor disputes; Labor relations; Demographic economics; Business; Political science; Secondary labor market; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.0619441136671185,"score_gpt":0.319619913320048,"score_spread":0.2576757996529295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121136156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9537822,0.0013429557,0.0006048773,0.0034381766,0.000022406462,0.000018821065,0.0014808045,0.000023270277,0.03928643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706715,0.00012413517,0.00004016668,0.00009911738,0.000017121007,0.00000446125,0.00024816368,0.000003275345,0.0023964674],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989008,0.00018016754,0.0000448965,0.00015307107,0.00022367366,0.0004973982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959111,0.0007944559,0.0019603348,0.00015834963,0.00036011127,0.0008156296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004938457,0.00009173617,0.00028414547,0.0014819885,0.001121459,0.0023662003,0.0004495774,0.0005822648,0.018887138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004260002,0.00009419582,0.0002709316,0.0015757027,0.0011201185,0.00090994814,0.0012994678,0.0007503226,0.0010857887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015492165,0.00033449038,0.89310277,0.00010299134,0.00016925948,0.00082770904,0.0024217975,0.0039634216,0.0010103461,0.052598644,0.008456512,0.03685718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022076807,0.00007053384,0.9726433,0.00006803807,0.000017568933,0.00014145114,0.003191316,0.0010436088,0.00021453737,0.0069684507,0.015600069,0.000018918627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038379855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05931357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038379855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001972621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009950522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0763129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121151652","doi":"","title":"The Role of Corporate Governance in Curbing Foreign Corrupt Business Practices","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Corporate governance; Sanctions; Language change; Multinational corporation; Business; Legislature; Legislation; Corrupt practices; Corporate law; Law and economics; Accounting; Law; Political science; Economics; Finance; Enforcement; Politics","score_opus":0.046982124826725286,"score_gpt":0.2323398217887053,"score_spread":0.18535769696198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121151652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41004118,0.0041910913,0.033864487,0.029554345,0.00019433945,0.00021130513,0.000048491976,0.000118799755,0.52177596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958039,0.00042137227,0.0009124184,0.0004918128,0.000033051958,0.0000148780055,0.0000049248,0.0000056513745,0.0023120255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99318933,0.0034948643,0.00015984524,0.00043758,0.0012167443,0.0015016716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812657,0.008097668,0.005328197,0.0016595313,0.002444052,0.0012048342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007483786,0.0002317275,0.00028334284,0.0014727982,0.0023819685,0.0072659757,0.0005689004,0.0014129599,0.0024759916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020227946,0.0001708306,0.00024057519,0.0010282388,0.009613488,0.002516792,0.0022777815,0.0014705362,0.00027140163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031657026,0.00014438768,0.044598162,0.00011575507,0.000054159325,0.00031160092,0.0045631854,0.0047181943,0.00085046975,0.88577646,0.0034003577,0.055435717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108150016,0.00043528172,0.14491218,0.0016251298,0.00020330002,0.0005808571,0.018628491,0.020634579,0.005188575,0.66296226,0.14462842,0.000092714494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01135241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01650826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01135241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004347444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007612617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039578497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121158536","doi":"","title":"Reasonable Notice for Wrongful Dismissal: Court Versus Human Resource Decisions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Severance; Notice; Human resource policies; Business; Human resources; Economic Justice; Compensation (psychology); Resource (disambiguation); Law; Actuarial science; Labour economics; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03763162299620832,"score_gpt":0.25242955089781693,"score_spread":0.21479792790160862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121158536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19661127,0.008868433,0.01861695,0.18932858,0.0022759072,0.000372099,0.0007719385,0.00018227159,0.58297247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97665554,0.00095201115,0.0011214145,0.007778438,0.0013282835,0.00006795239,0.00006435124,0.00004584744,0.011986053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95541495,0.017540043,0.0043367334,0.003632602,0.013855673,0.005219931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7546348,0.18721569,0.023732077,0.008976468,0.017436191,0.008004738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033994243,0.00037206995,0.0010371524,0.00465414,0.0047777477,0.012047416,0.0021968924,0.014294707,0.031117238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2872864,0.0003541621,0.0009317615,0.0026281395,0.0067961705,0.0074444995,0.004028839,0.007164206,0.0028326912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007217359,0.00020665501,0.017416192,0.00025873617,0.00013625782,0.002492651,0.0062089404,0.0012375207,0.00067459716,0.86891717,0.04824445,0.05348512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003740722,0.00025909298,0.039646093,0.0007477539,0.00023356793,0.0013676203,0.007638023,0.005715663,0.0010157967,0.85506654,0.08772134,0.0002144356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01188119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016825845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033994243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006310835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01054693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1797809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121195795","doi":"","title":"Contract Structure for Joint Production: Risk and Ambiguity under Compensatory Damages","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Damages; Deliverable; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Dual (grammatical number); Action (physics); Comparative statics; Risk analysis (engineering); Industrial organization; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.06416601004055786,"score_gpt":0.232901376428908,"score_spread":0.16873536638835016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121195795","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074274346,0.0034294482,0.6730935,0.02922009,0.00044512286,0.0008070218,0.0006480207,0.0001908041,0.21789171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8911476,0.0017183748,0.069555745,0.00093090674,0.00042580077,0.00055591966,0.00017773174,0.00008635971,0.035401504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870586,0.007425926,0.0005968023,0.00095734827,0.0029195177,0.0010418631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96784896,0.021410808,0.0033553613,0.0031266103,0.0030907693,0.0011673995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016169848,0.0009788894,0.0012164582,0.001230343,0.0029113712,0.0075117396,0.0023731603,0.005250524,0.022088576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042184044,0.0010154204,0.0019520415,0.0015263413,0.004710152,0.013160718,0.0048849075,0.006617211,0.0012841412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001674257,0.00002908722,0.0004807708,0.000035315734,0.000012982236,0.000079723875,0.00027754097,0.008207625,0.00015826827,0.9834115,0.001246587,0.0060438826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014226831,0.000044100474,0.00041374276,0.00006232719,0.000015535104,0.00007628073,0.00017121086,0.024889236,0.0003002653,0.9654974,0.008478313,0.000037295827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027847837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039502163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022088576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068651005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052097486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08551532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121197445","doi":"10.1257/mic.20200218","title":"Reporting Sexual Misconduct in the #MeToo Era","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Microeconomics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual misconduct; Misconduct; Sanctions; Confidentiality; Raising (metalworking); Psychology; Political science; Business; Criminology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.03845440854246405,"score_gpt":0.24683048807852725,"score_spread":0.2083760795360632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121197445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6776485,0.0040191435,0.079379275,0.082538806,0.00076808635,0.000538045,0.0068402216,0.0005864074,0.1476815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9737395,0.0011482785,0.0034248652,0.0012266943,0.00032213403,0.00010354394,0.00050293596,0.000030048866,0.0195021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956262,0.0019670303,0.00027119886,0.0007118564,0.0004544425,0.00096926093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9526118,0.021462306,0.018962497,0.0023917123,0.0026368366,0.0019348311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008125031,0.0005278805,0.000982058,0.0017256406,0.001650637,0.008443063,0.0032438352,0.004896929,0.016691683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04336471,0.0006723,0.0007439939,0.0021114524,0.0036926337,0.006982428,0.0038316462,0.0039589014,0.0023209013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005116923,0.0007151779,0.12468984,0.00032350284,0.0001667939,0.0024122286,0.0042954898,0.088045485,0.00053364027,0.6599399,0.03579453,0.08257174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002992749,0.00070902164,0.03431705,0.000602831,0.00030528626,0.0014724729,0.004385547,0.38319057,0.0009475077,0.52382445,0.049570158,0.0003758645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021443384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0139806345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021443384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004083613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024423979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05583924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121430106","doi":"","title":"All’s Well that Ends Well: Addressing End-of-Life Liabilities for Oil and Gas Wells","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"C.D. Howe Institute Commentary","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Creditor; Greenhouse gas; Business; Natural resource economics; Fossil fuel; Liability; Finance; Debt; Economics; Engineering; Waste management","score_opus":0.10363039862424603,"score_gpt":0.27310015103059926,"score_spread":0.16946975240635323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121430106","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07531047,0.015461386,0.0117767695,0.6326154,0.0018772135,0.0003715894,0.00047092565,0.00032080666,0.2617955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74672747,0.020361524,0.013918564,0.13568541,0.0016620985,0.0001426988,0.00052006304,0.00013464299,0.08084749],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946538,0.0008668258,0.000100149344,0.00021083059,0.0023913716,0.0017769214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833134,0.0049585924,0.0008463721,0.0003843922,0.0063320342,0.004165268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005364945,0.0006470143,0.00042201456,0.0018331595,0.009368906,0.010139573,0.0028806154,0.011904994,0.011187142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018759055,0.00044543174,0.00082413375,0.0012133602,0.0044077355,0.005715435,0.004488046,0.008788858,0.00087305694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007453646,0.00045845596,0.027386883,0.0006009796,0.00011831812,0.0035580406,0.0051652994,0.0075112535,0.0018173419,0.36662218,0.45699224,0.12969449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008747776,0.00027394097,0.028571289,0.0026188102,0.00028336173,0.0014877722,0.021162672,0.012580673,0.0017191955,0.15378557,0.7771313,0.00029785937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43265784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7433723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56734216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020162273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0884524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86027896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121439469","doi":"10.1093/jleo/ews002","title":"Legal Liability when Individuals Have Moral Concerns","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Economics and Organization","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Sanctions; Liability; Incentive; Strict liability; Tort; Enforcement; Crowds; Business; Normative; Law and economics; Crowding out; Legal liability; Plaintiff; Crowding; Political science; Law; Economics; Psychology; Computer security; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03394274248497712,"score_gpt":0.21690194750794833,"score_spread":0.18295920502297122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121439469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5735772,0.00084055756,0.16274352,0.023403697,0.00027675275,0.00021188574,0.00018307616,0.0001497054,0.2386135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873713,0.00011776041,0.0037556652,0.00062980247,0.00010194357,0.000054425258,0.00001924444,0.00000817955,0.00794174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968093,0.0010946282,0.00013448654,0.0004820925,0.00068824703,0.00079117354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938693,0.0023905216,0.0015078627,0.0008656656,0.0005042862,0.0008623343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033062904,0.0005350178,0.0006390382,0.00083767006,0.0017001332,0.003309318,0.0009816894,0.004078723,0.00776534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013324915,0.00039335218,0.00076257,0.00039346208,0.00441039,0.0043276497,0.0037401218,0.003431994,0.00051592203],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042768123,0.00018199859,0.004409937,0.000036289704,0.000027161854,0.0008904242,0.0009351872,0.00753522,0.0005515782,0.97447884,0.0017406214,0.009170042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006567466,0.00008819693,0.0026715256,0.000051907173,0.000035995326,0.000669962,0.0006299064,0.029249676,0.00038174997,0.9594253,0.0066867555,0.000043434473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002559872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002357327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00776534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017139895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015478639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025977671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121489284","doi":"10.1111/sjoe.12225","title":"Court Efficiency and Procurement Performance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet; Università degli Studi di Padova; Canada Research Chairs; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Inefficiency; Procurement; Payment; Order (exchange); Business; Work (physics); Simple (philosophy); Law and economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Finance; Marketing; Engineering","score_opus":0.037499465065137357,"score_gpt":0.22127707877048552,"score_spread":0.18377761370534818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121489284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9510307,0.0020555144,0.005026184,0.0027563157,0.00004506639,0.0000595899,0.004755989,0.00013130643,0.034139264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99526876,0.00018833819,0.0002888192,0.00007698413,0.00006043919,0.00001133283,0.0019389795,0.00003080136,0.0021355976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849022,0.005888156,0.0018562748,0.0018445511,0.003415104,0.0020937133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80953467,0.0965349,0.065125674,0.011271766,0.00964644,0.007886545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01152028,0.00035978656,0.0010577147,0.004482044,0.001026213,0.005633694,0.0010504219,0.0013643509,0.02692033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10124784,0.0003522945,0.00050556543,0.007768909,0.0015851251,0.0025762976,0.0017483849,0.0017795084,0.0043300935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043008427,0.00052921905,0.8978079,0.00024929497,0.00059578975,0.00043255268,0.00086951524,0.03238985,0.0005563088,0.015985949,0.013774429,0.03637913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084400264,0.00030445633,0.94589484,0.00015131565,0.00012920515,0.00047020713,0.0020488456,0.016644541,0.0008736865,0.018951597,0.0143560115,0.0000908784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008990117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00864104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02692033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037772737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001747988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09005743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121497808","doi":"10.1016/j.irle.2009.01.003","title":"Plea bargaining with budgetary constraints","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"International Review of Law and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Plea; Sanctions; Economics; Construct (python library); Simple (philosophy); Law and economics; Deterrence theory; Microeconomics; Public economics; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03465327880403498,"score_gpt":0.24601887458496896,"score_spread":0.21136559578093397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121497808","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03283185,0.022637872,0.4878246,0.033154707,0.0014582748,0.0002660328,0.00076570146,0.00024316463,0.4208179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79863334,0.010147586,0.04014146,0.003929749,0.003366714,0.0006861625,0.00044435734,0.00014575744,0.14250498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99103665,0.0051891594,0.00032205327,0.0012447459,0.0011009909,0.0011064312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854972,0.01162937,0.0008501282,0.0008356916,0.0006107648,0.00057695055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01057627,0.0014858652,0.003422299,0.001673338,0.002942978,0.009320909,0.002516105,0.008637867,0.02896028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026889691,0.0015822389,0.001723489,0.0028948078,0.005498075,0.010008816,0.002858208,0.008776271,0.003948438],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026008367,0.00002196284,0.00008684028,0.000040328137,0.000022438862,0.000054246273,0.000053125674,0.006748175,0.0000397442,0.9852042,0.0039832233,0.003719726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034285353,0.0000061318433,0.000082294224,0.000025290128,0.000010323519,0.000023944624,0.000027606098,0.007833318,0.000025664025,0.9873181,0.004604502,0.000008673021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032875892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035960465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02896028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004350994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032605722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09688181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121540345","doi":"10.1093/jleo/ewm046","title":"Accuracy Versus Falsification Costs: The Optimal Amount of Evidence under Different Procedures","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Economics and Organization","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Arbiter; Ask price; Economics; Computer science; Computer network","score_opus":0.06411288203950508,"score_gpt":0.2596440132476515,"score_spread":0.19553113120814644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121540345","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40019667,0.007450259,0.47593182,0.028107436,0.00041713598,0.0021569007,0.0011265895,0.0005904125,0.08402285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9146763,0.0012225143,0.07907687,0.0008921432,0.0008157731,0.00075680023,0.00014670724,0.000095745956,0.0023170258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8802159,0.06905635,0.011132086,0.010025343,0.022782262,0.0067880163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2908176,0.6367301,0.029680278,0.029767944,0.0090759285,0.003928219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10431313,0.0018249897,0.0036833053,0.0077661895,0.0021959601,0.01279653,0.006155509,0.012101104,0.007355781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4291851,0.0024822496,0.0023652045,0.003463267,0.015521358,0.026003065,0.0075590652,0.0073171137,0.0009057631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004219542,0.00075907254,0.012233427,0.0010153145,0.0008569888,0.00086841395,0.0010607932,0.107831374,0.0041913954,0.71489847,0.0019972709,0.15006787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006750924,0.0008336278,0.008790967,0.000558588,0.0005533625,0.00068659714,0.0005502705,0.07321562,0.003410792,0.9083155,0.002228159,0.0001814185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011547541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009959139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10431313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057846652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045716916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55166715},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3121572313","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2019-0038","title":"Sizing up private law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Simplicity; Private law; Law and economics; Law; Function (biology); Political science; Functionalism (philosophy of mind); Public law; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01597979342325995,"score_gpt":0.17613633175462592,"score_spread":0.16015653833136598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121572313","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041314207,0.0037438003,0.14995009,0.07518866,0.0011942877,0.0001387235,0.00013619247,0.0003388864,0.7279952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90799785,0.0022614324,0.03041915,0.007108076,0.00085060997,0.00017261869,0.0001188496,0.00027508728,0.0507964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928517,0.002726496,0.0002993569,0.0012784065,0.0019979635,0.0008461028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99123305,0.0036482916,0.00055809494,0.0025091623,0.0012767114,0.00077460974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010034969,0.0007543363,0.0007164529,0.0026794435,0.007315829,0.017679194,0.001390391,0.0053816824,0.012308976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015596644,0.00059199176,0.0010257439,0.0013178455,0.037763234,0.02609754,0.00999375,0.009101308,0.002330771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022257677,0.000003914477,0.00008088157,0.0000092562195,0.0000012621665,0.000020876567,0.00061910227,0.00011272921,0.000049963975,0.9953198,0.0008720373,0.002907893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047662575,0.000009157775,0.00014043943,0.00007359198,0.000005059328,0.000050594226,0.00074263697,0.00091561116,0.00016836957,0.9541694,0.043711912,0.000008301085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00339975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003370815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017679194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008303165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008356233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060243964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121582674","doi":"","title":"Court Efficiency and Procurement Performance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Università degli Studi di Padova; Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca","keywords":"Inefficiency; Procurement; Payment; Business; Order (exchange); Work (physics); Purchase order; Finance; Economics; Microeconomics; Marketing; Vendor; Engineering","score_opus":0.044537597138402794,"score_gpt":0.2679159344686461,"score_spread":0.2233783373302433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121582674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90326273,0.0029528467,0.0076502683,0.0051520364,0.00007475181,0.000113032154,0.018599782,0.00023976968,0.061954826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98414546,0.00039336953,0.0006542078,0.00017499986,0.00009650715,0.000031775126,0.008692323,0.000070513684,0.0057408083],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905985,0.003050299,0.0010397783,0.0014303105,0.002437104,0.0014440073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9002968,0.045298293,0.035817783,0.008313332,0.0061854534,0.004088339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00900342,0.00034679638,0.0009379878,0.003770372,0.0010745053,0.005324434,0.0011521993,0.0015298707,0.030663356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07185435,0.00036838904,0.0005762142,0.00786944,0.0014383642,0.002832115,0.0018976451,0.00205926,0.006186718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005738775,0.00064523984,0.8153793,0.00041146926,0.0006239658,0.0005281065,0.0012258579,0.038525503,0.0006966301,0.030899704,0.05289909,0.05759116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011731073,0.00023582621,0.9227395,0.00016912055,0.00014002602,0.00045459918,0.0017906893,0.020106591,0.0010431471,0.019584924,0.03352122,0.000097024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015862964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018434897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030663356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038467662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019063678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10257912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121681834","doi":"","title":"Business Dominance in the 'People's Court': An Empirical Assessment of Business Activity in the Toronto Small Claims Court","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Dominance (genetics); Business; Law; Fell; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.026506732640077676,"score_gpt":0.26463819825150825,"score_spread":0.23813146561143056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121681834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884849,0.00018459192,0.00012196301,0.00037850052,0.0000049421737,0.000018127164,0.00016787996,0.0000030753479,0.010635988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981205,0.00011392729,0.000045886936,0.00004055135,0.00000624181,0.00000904232,0.00015077506,0.000002481637,0.0015106472],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952614,0.0009203349,0.0003004216,0.00039672185,0.0021126408,0.001008563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731156,0.0063717337,0.009026322,0.00063311984,0.004020553,0.006832581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002144395,0.00018952269,0.0004969922,0.003897321,0.006960677,0.005142028,0.00097385823,0.0007891407,0.0054456554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018405264,0.0003057311,0.00021460844,0.005519454,0.005057584,0.0025073744,0.0047839303,0.0012944321,0.00050750497],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019863425,0.00013536922,0.86052006,0.000089024536,0.000080247075,0.0019600142,0.10454012,0.00063378457,0.00083461025,0.007614447,0.0045121443,0.018881539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073191227,0.000057835918,0.92789304,0.000051490984,0.000018825505,0.00017293214,0.066018395,0.0005633827,0.00017885739,0.00058880507,0.004421968,0.00002707687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73763865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88471764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26236135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024088265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012018402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52781284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121709420","doi":"10.29173/alr339","title":"Imperfect Duty: Lawyers’ Obligation to Foster Access to Justice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Legitimacy; Law; Duty; Law and economics; Monopoly; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.06945273712844409,"score_gpt":0.27587164486472676,"score_spread":0.2064189077362827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121709420","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14017111,0.03209156,0.028249497,0.3507262,0.0007085513,0.000121061894,0.000088919376,0.00007795714,0.4477651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96016324,0.0045974413,0.0021829004,0.019776778,0.0005818413,0.000033404856,0.00001915943,0.000012782008,0.012632498],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98444366,0.0066327653,0.000694222,0.0013345324,0.0050989324,0.0017958062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9525407,0.030272694,0.007143758,0.0034995188,0.0043730657,0.0021702207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012321108,0.0001739046,0.0005003194,0.0011930537,0.0035419213,0.00824891,0.0015480178,0.008212334,0.004579869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045826446,0.00046280338,0.00036943163,0.00093863363,0.020565603,0.007849395,0.0047381497,0.0062742773,0.0003841547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011612156,0.000022510256,0.0015730505,0.00007123959,0.000017252976,0.00009184838,0.0007771344,0.00044430202,0.00014962273,0.9824786,0.00464217,0.009720625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046182995,0.000047753627,0.010564373,0.00045004985,0.000052815114,0.00019041033,0.0012895528,0.0013665867,0.00046904697,0.9170583,0.06842875,0.00003620298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015811505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021088144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9841885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009720945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009274815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07053077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121801449","doi":"10.7892/boris.145660","title":"The Optimal Amount of Falsified Testimony","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Cahiers de recherche","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Arbiter; Commit; Adjudication; Ask price; Law and economics; Computer science; Political science; Economics; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.21703617901648695,"score_gpt":0.31093066647979456,"score_spread":0.09389448746330761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121801449","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30887726,0.005986773,0.4775319,0.031502947,0.0010573526,0.00096607785,0.0021322507,0.001114288,0.17083117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93345964,0.0013769894,0.056805708,0.00077821047,0.0004347915,0.00025661386,0.00019534798,0.00011468549,0.0065780226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98740864,0.006673559,0.00079455745,0.0018556485,0.0021146685,0.0011530347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8976366,0.08141595,0.0047951597,0.008013386,0.00474134,0.00339755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015435714,0.0010635275,0.0021673786,0.0024122691,0.0012093656,0.0048361938,0.0025450373,0.005122033,0.014574365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10930511,0.0011604477,0.00051883113,0.0009542284,0.003804926,0.008106392,0.0032926353,0.0027573,0.0021888774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036835258,0.00056331366,0.00340935,0.0012719148,0.00024375787,0.0007281399,0.00053992,0.1073236,0.010843207,0.6798261,0.009012593,0.1825546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043413378,0.0005258362,0.002987831,0.0008946114,0.00015398813,0.0006608931,0.00057121646,0.13932961,0.008420081,0.8374683,0.008460274,0.00009315443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063628884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005548923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015435714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021025434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002899042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08163279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121835603","doi":"10.3386/w22597","title":"Executive Lawyers: Gatekeepers or Strategic Officers?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Executive summary; Accounting; Public relations; Management; Finance; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.46234662183344666,"score_gpt":0.4574588466121488,"score_spread":0.004887775221297852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121835603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9460904,0.0026356222,0.0025848,0.020580694,0.00023386051,0.00006456545,0.00031553218,0.00005635211,0.027438093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99123186,0.0004981007,0.00050245086,0.0020753224,0.00011194164,0.000017587585,0.0001245438,0.0000052754554,0.0054328903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979366,0.000531963,0.00009953283,0.00034357482,0.0005733473,0.0005149633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901736,0.0030875313,0.004513492,0.00033477924,0.0003367893,0.0015538348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001972776,0.00027462112,0.0004481731,0.00068214786,0.0008225059,0.0021412044,0.0005373199,0.0011361885,0.015256164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013842359,0.00027636232,0.00018587719,0.0009359399,0.0011232258,0.0026743666,0.00094218133,0.0011156359,0.0012281734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004962472,0.001075245,0.74571633,0.00031840793,0.00016607938,0.0006930419,0.003295065,0.0007839549,0.0020405478,0.030193748,0.027427942,0.18779336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028101337,0.00096089946,0.8745516,0.00053302466,0.00030155698,0.0012222455,0.020066576,0.0030621046,0.0017021243,0.030490225,0.06676261,0.00006596973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00244494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010735198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015256164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071080006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011938591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051036954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121889772","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2016.1","title":"On the Spontaneous Emergence of Private Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Section (typography); Scope (computer science); Transaction cost; Law and economics; Process (computing); Private law; Database transaction; Political science; Law; Economics; Public law; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Legislature","score_opus":0.026296379070605776,"score_gpt":0.20778364044312944,"score_spread":0.18148726137252366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121889772","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29061958,0.0011473232,0.37882963,0.02486291,0.00013891728,0.00035144415,0.0002005683,0.00025709704,0.30359253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98392975,0.0002212092,0.012442776,0.0003613723,0.00006129387,0.00009866808,0.000031449537,0.000026354974,0.0028270755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913407,0.0044867066,0.0002552884,0.0011411376,0.001920812,0.0008553097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668259,0.021602467,0.0024758636,0.005501893,0.00281846,0.0007754063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013378591,0.00024966372,0.00045701477,0.0013729439,0.0031878417,0.0045110304,0.001201616,0.0021381269,0.0037348294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0310587,0.00030374128,0.00060059107,0.00075590145,0.02075903,0.007522811,0.0036635655,0.0033721447,0.00040490952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034571735,0.000009551226,0.00034414075,0.0000085556485,0.000002045286,0.000048305243,0.00067861396,0.000674095,0.00012282141,0.99549437,0.00021902595,0.0023951358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012556248,0.000014471904,0.0005131981,0.00002740738,0.000002738991,0.00007596038,0.00048551746,0.005175824,0.00026293762,0.9864189,0.007002031,0.000008435946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020565249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017296952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013378591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030795843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036924337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070753574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122018027","doi":"","title":"Damage Averaging and the Formation of Class Action Suits","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Humanities; Class (philosophy); Identity (music); Class action; Action (physics); Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Physics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.061249195338668884,"score_gpt":0.28977087820181857,"score_spread":0.2285216828631497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122018027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62710685,0.00086233637,0.020252218,0.0036067287,0.00016635456,0.00025178076,0.00010630113,0.000092053444,0.34755546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806991,0.000115351424,0.0011575846,0.00020687596,0.00003945485,0.00006105125,0.00002568358,0.000010746835,0.017684309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918779,0.0024835356,0.0004000274,0.0009983171,0.0016150043,0.002625216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897794,0.0029873368,0.0030138753,0.0008647572,0.0010101035,0.0023445126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073531037,0.00048169907,0.0005610216,0.001803362,0.0072674756,0.005898513,0.0012318416,0.0025204925,0.020581268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020102866,0.00033232535,0.00066030526,0.0008377718,0.0067150043,0.0037832628,0.0058555175,0.002636477,0.0010091956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025946944,0.0003891056,0.04495372,0.00007197638,0.000091334936,0.000786583,0.011998438,0.004069548,0.0019021636,0.86005735,0.0041047195,0.0713157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097515585,0.00094809337,0.2249818,0.0003119892,0.00015064339,0.0008423523,0.021882541,0.018949604,0.0026653863,0.613976,0.11494299,0.00025098433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012837157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0150635345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020581268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004593393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026925092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06885123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122086499","doi":"10.29173/wclawr24","title":"Unintelligent Decision-Making?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plea; Conviction; Innocence; Pleading; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.051277317558620035,"score_gpt":0.2583765548348348,"score_spread":0.20709923727621476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122086499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8133764,0.0034220505,0.012250627,0.0518638,0.0007091225,0.00018057281,0.00024095818,0.00009823905,0.117858216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916461,0.0006753953,0.0015410896,0.0030451627,0.00015445944,0.0000609298,0.00007454035,0.000015156967,0.0027870594],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933089,0.004057742,0.0002536367,0.00084624585,0.00079719466,0.0007362749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96408594,0.02221469,0.0066956533,0.0026423507,0.0010298082,0.0033316263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0095112445,0.00036989135,0.00030101702,0.0006732569,0.00136185,0.004864136,0.0009203666,0.0020420768,0.018194852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061030414,0.0002955257,0.00048353255,0.00048405046,0.0044130036,0.0036098012,0.0018112615,0.0030601348,0.0012836539],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018779008,0.0030117189,0.26611406,0.0006647694,0.0003523718,0.0038957647,0.04013238,0.0044164234,0.002175114,0.23476015,0.03340609,0.40919322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068386376,0.0006789387,0.1325974,0.0012829136,0.00022735915,0.003432538,0.027791608,0.018070407,0.0021091353,0.73868215,0.07424501,0.00019868724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012266687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001246651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018194852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093303504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018763319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060867846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122092797","doi":"10.7202/1087019ar","title":"L’ÉCONOMIE DE LA PREUVE JUDICIAIRE","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05154550260770192,"score_gpt":0.23163539625011384,"score_spread":0.18008989364241193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122092797","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14159852,0.008040085,0.5758342,0.027846262,0.000630332,0.00031790647,0.00096551166,0.00030156417,0.24446559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88381386,0.0062265424,0.026217252,0.00079508947,0.0006734433,0.00026005728,0.00025035522,0.00009759303,0.08166574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973335,0.00082941074,0.000094524,0.00043108495,0.00091097335,0.00040050733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99371207,0.0043891417,0.00055901706,0.00048842526,0.0005689787,0.00028244415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002832647,0.0008400877,0.0013258877,0.0014567988,0.0016814627,0.0067751207,0.0019995158,0.0043130433,0.017710058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012290623,0.001085617,0.0014460573,0.0014999512,0.0036468757,0.007165624,0.0024311845,0.005193983,0.0020308788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028667562,0.000051734405,0.0015879,0.00006694087,0.00002864384,0.00014406812,0.0002630815,0.049563326,0.0003021873,0.9386547,0.0017073055,0.007601417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049033893,0.000089649126,0.0029286307,0.00011149292,0.000037579175,0.0003288019,0.00021713294,0.12715682,0.00039454573,0.8435857,0.025050001,0.000050607097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012415392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008182045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017710058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005145124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004819076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059246063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122126153","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2005.05.009","title":"Split-awards and disputes: An experimental study of a strategic model of litigation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Carnegie Mellon University","keywords":"Plaintiff; Punitive damages; Statute; Law; Institution; Statute of limitations; Compensation (psychology); Business; Political science; Economics; Law and economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.052317451098599775,"score_gpt":0.2513271892508369,"score_spread":0.19900973815223713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122126153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931009,0.00007010924,0.0019886293,0.00065314706,0.00006869659,0.00020943493,0.00012376581,0.000017304174,0.0037679637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939295,0.00016760237,0.0026952138,0.00026699086,0.00008799816,0.0003352941,0.00015453792,0.00002517158,0.002337665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540293,0.0024719755,0.00038676776,0.00063316437,0.0007265,0.00037872005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86658806,0.11228084,0.009779015,0.00742606,0.0012927555,0.0026333244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010897269,0.0014049313,0.0017297865,0.0008686052,0.0017308779,0.0051135668,0.0031313077,0.0048489175,0.016056003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058221992,0.0012745727,0.0010478437,0.0010915035,0.0047598486,0.0053985417,0.0017682238,0.0054230276,0.001267134],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06374536,0.32669505,0.060144484,0.0014685259,0.0016835817,0.0016067922,0.016945668,0.044242278,0.0572643,0.37320316,0.008655573,0.044345304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.046098616,0.0791555,0.05501602,0.00027613182,0.00193758,0.0014626764,0.006634718,0.3014533,0.014402761,0.48685494,0.006066066,0.00064166577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002336714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002144009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016056003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017250839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023312566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057630956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122152843","doi":"","title":"The Core, Transaction Costs, and the Coase Theorem","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Coase theorem; Externality; Transaction cost; Core (optical fiber); Economics; Microeconomics; Pareto efficiency; Pareto principle; Negotiation; Excludability; Public good; Mathematical economics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Operations management","score_opus":0.011906276065733358,"score_gpt":0.19576389656397405,"score_spread":0.1838576204982407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122152843","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053096328,0.0053753755,0.51366115,0.01886506,0.0004207614,0.0002470782,0.00020263619,0.00011995885,0.40801165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8951372,0.003402872,0.05452628,0.0022679397,0.00060758827,0.00052179204,0.000121839206,0.00016012207,0.043254435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903487,0.003756556,0.0004546688,0.0017187372,0.0025223773,0.0011989934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97092897,0.017997062,0.0021772718,0.0048957136,0.003059338,0.0009416579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010667381,0.00071363477,0.0013972457,0.0019898224,0.003598684,0.0073785475,0.0022894398,0.0034359675,0.012437389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026376652,0.0005440047,0.00108599,0.002034543,0.020373149,0.019743344,0.005559154,0.006188915,0.0016422966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060413718,0.000003621356,0.00003724202,0.00000933436,0.0000017956698,0.000009697907,0.00004906107,0.00033733205,0.0000201537,0.99770975,0.0002916003,0.0015243542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008647123,0.000007731496,0.00004467541,0.000024867817,0.0000026738226,0.000032422737,0.000052660682,0.0012390154,0.00011842723,0.9919533,0.006509837,0.0000057886577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022785098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012761598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012437389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006914183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004348317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0564152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122350488","doi":"","title":"Toward a Smarter Enterprise: Disaggregation and Dispersion for Innovation and Excellence","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Excellence; Business; Industrial organization; Dispersion (optics); Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.015171252588667462,"score_gpt":0.2061010505658629,"score_spread":0.19092979797719542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122350488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6158682,0.0023440144,0.25545976,0.019891474,0.00014529456,0.000115359035,0.0012830426,0.00069509057,0.104197666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98851264,0.00019356477,0.008984493,0.00023831932,0.000054210865,0.000024194938,0.0001190526,0.0000367522,0.0018368234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966434,0.0009500178,0.0002352989,0.0010399517,0.0006837927,0.00044766814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870724,0.0045156907,0.002356542,0.003803402,0.001392633,0.0008594225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035620248,0.00032427322,0.0014353292,0.0032625457,0.0020140489,0.008526072,0.001067197,0.0024146757,0.007930093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019606035,0.00032730398,0.00074465206,0.004382676,0.005319994,0.016336832,0.0073440215,0.002582466,0.00077070325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064855354,0.00007351933,0.018487679,0.00007491234,0.00011354919,0.000064007276,0.0022965188,0.011692014,0.00049357815,0.92265654,0.002676141,0.041306745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071124036,0.00001556091,0.0071217064,0.000022461949,0.000019591922,0.000030158191,0.00089056016,0.009645243,0.00014887041,0.9780579,0.0040263436,0.000014493703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058760163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005940267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008526072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003551289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018965364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026528835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122369420","doi":"","title":"Deterrence effects under Twombly: on the costs of increasing pleading standards in litigation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Pleading; Supreme court; Stylized fact; Economics; Incentive; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.06140602431973239,"score_gpt":0.3114621376476918,"score_spread":0.2500561133279594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122369420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8350726,0.0011015773,0.06159933,0.0069279633,0.000059092687,0.00020290818,0.00028936428,0.00013395803,0.0946132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99359643,0.00019534038,0.002531014,0.00038499045,0.000021934064,0.00005251867,0.000019322124,0.000008291478,0.0031900639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955017,0.0016730308,0.00019781548,0.000609763,0.0009858164,0.0010318062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96428066,0.020989561,0.009924632,0.001983875,0.0012717079,0.0015495284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045744176,0.0009524262,0.0014832717,0.0013505837,0.0015829297,0.004680385,0.0018225706,0.0043319915,0.008186729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027729854,0.00081570016,0.0010827829,0.00074602367,0.0037315078,0.005374299,0.0035247246,0.0047307415,0.0005535809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005768289,0.00077012583,0.0070103267,0.00025207072,0.00010850487,0.0008252298,0.00072079175,0.12132878,0.0056253304,0.8388256,0.0017878251,0.022168515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084160076,0.0018005505,0.021222964,0.00023910392,0.0002797419,0.00077994965,0.00061984657,0.3015079,0.0041363775,0.65965194,0.008651392,0.00026869387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070884335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054906053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008186729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042128908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026656915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030566752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122381350","doi":"","title":"An Analysis of Costs Awarded by the Alberta Energy Regulator","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Statutory law; Legislature; Tribunal; Regulator; Business; Dissemination; Public administration; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0102221506514553,"score_gpt":0.21591064712061608,"score_spread":0.2056884964691608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122381350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47397095,0.0019169715,0.0053583104,0.008075664,0.0002066473,0.00022882737,0.0004826669,0.00012752507,0.5096324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95257014,0.00051429926,0.00059718615,0.00053561217,0.000081573875,0.000038323768,0.0001241869,0.000021803802,0.045516863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98365617,0.0021006877,0.00022386783,0.0006306608,0.009198285,0.0041903052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798829,0.0077474387,0.0021856092,0.00073682505,0.007909115,0.0015380468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006292236,0.00036006345,0.0006342403,0.003454454,0.0048630103,0.0072550704,0.0025516222,0.0025687865,0.010916554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02544609,0.0005228115,0.0006698476,0.0025414678,0.0035212445,0.0017027656,0.0021853133,0.0033974084,0.0004541585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030833096,0.00017598369,0.038095076,0.000156629,0.00014710946,0.0010154541,0.002414122,0.033676114,0.0013584624,0.87250465,0.021458745,0.028689297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045910108,0.0007406262,0.36731717,0.00067276,0.0012830839,0.0008702343,0.025578208,0.12197954,0.004891836,0.19852002,0.27694404,0.0007433513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74969035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7963508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25030965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049532115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05499883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5035675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122445987","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.163268","title":"Self-Serving Biases: Evidence from a Simulated Labor Relationship","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Social psychology; Psychology; Economics; Labour economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.06158426258065882,"score_gpt":0.24952478173768117,"score_spread":0.18794051915702234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122445987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968911,0.00005180124,0.0017062724,0.0002366926,0.000013526518,0.000023106137,0.00016423824,0.00002062304,0.0008926103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982987,0.000033635955,0.0009288041,0.00006308523,0.0000104927485,0.000021997803,0.00023197061,0.00001396774,0.00039736566],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979388,0.0015482444,0.00008129929,0.00018230238,0.00014768126,0.0001017726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83859277,0.1431892,0.00583,0.007966174,0.0028766345,0.0015451588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066847694,0.00027839968,0.00061524665,0.00052018394,0.00050004455,0.001396445,0.0015505361,0.0021400852,0.006726815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085002534,0.00037341277,0.00033744366,0.0008270186,0.00077674916,0.0009877721,0.0008652403,0.0011563336,0.0008785579],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01737662,0.008480183,0.45874795,0.00071874,0.0009858742,0.0014543093,0.0060175774,0.3616071,0.010525056,0.05020627,0.020631168,0.06324911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018233958,0.001676558,0.082449056,0.000076577715,0.00028919507,0.0004343258,0.0009961614,0.8691556,0.004086104,0.036297034,0.0026279145,0.000088147804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035256608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028273303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006726815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061932375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005290527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035352826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122485104","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1433691","title":"Optimal Liability Sharing and Court Errors: An Exploratory Analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Exploratory analysis; Business; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Law; Computer science; Political science; Accounting; Economics; Data science","score_opus":0.027089816537013617,"score_gpt":0.23839596301657698,"score_spread":0.21130614647956336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122485104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9152637,0.0016077483,0.05444677,0.0038194985,0.000023522101,0.00016619466,0.000681885,0.000072587136,0.023918074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99644333,0.00034268893,0.0015185614,0.000048891066,0.000036605215,0.000018998742,0.00007244724,0.000009421182,0.0015090281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970409,0.0015856011,0.00013020838,0.0003135209,0.00039402148,0.00053561723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8921288,0.09730675,0.005181896,0.0024284883,0.0017940137,0.0011600268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006305485,0.0005161434,0.0016938476,0.0016626582,0.00086830114,0.003346628,0.0016916565,0.0023610992,0.016858777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04484034,0.0006315934,0.0011952075,0.0016495279,0.0019016123,0.005340517,0.0016930052,0.0026521676,0.00037314979],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00093787967,0.00096556137,0.043818973,0.00038943585,0.000386219,0.0009388886,0.0013124985,0.19921288,0.0012021626,0.7141906,0.0033508262,0.033294037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018299396,0.0004618905,0.029577173,0.00008602641,0.00033384477,0.00046382658,0.0020184065,0.22469905,0.00060914626,0.74009347,0.0014029182,0.00007130921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002901702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002604005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016858777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018512469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020191013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056398273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122518478","doi":"10.1086/677297","title":"Trial and Settlement: A Study of High-Low Agreements","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Speculation; Settlement (finance); Actuarial science; Outlier; Business; Empirical evidence; Empirical research; Economics; Law; Political science; Finance; Payment; Computer science","score_opus":0.02819099435777972,"score_gpt":0.21495755659553936,"score_spread":0.18676656223775964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122518478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.863841,0.0011018735,0.023512686,0.004775173,0.00004835501,0.00017259402,0.00013645877,0.00003902576,0.106372766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968226,0.00014901558,0.0008759272,0.00017839832,0.00003623504,0.000039499737,0.000041972413,0.000012700034,0.0018436407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848718,0.008793096,0.00078143226,0.0012199893,0.0023450223,0.0019885914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86332566,0.09659557,0.024181766,0.004515565,0.0046612243,0.0067202845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018195424,0.00024103161,0.0010118132,0.0019582822,0.0065246285,0.008101819,0.002062402,0.0030255644,0.013743568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0852822,0.00044241073,0.00054747774,0.002422317,0.00782909,0.007725322,0.00512134,0.0063762586,0.0011552123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048003477,0.0011923818,0.08854332,0.00017931046,0.00008865488,0.0014537077,0.021377727,0.0037494188,0.00083830766,0.8469035,0.002705934,0.03248771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030014938,0.0008723053,0.08752403,0.00036758592,0.00012716945,0.0017065485,0.057718087,0.034542784,0.0011524977,0.78862584,0.026915481,0.00014758317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004455798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027708102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018195424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036828737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035803723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096227705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122549773","doi":"","title":"Legal Liability when Individuals Have Moral Concerns","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Sanctions; Normative; Liability; Strict liability; Tort; Law and economics; Business; Incentive; Legal liability; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.07723870016034677,"score_gpt":0.30713339246798965,"score_spread":0.22989469230764287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122549773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54912484,0.0010237944,0.2074557,0.026566096,0.00028971286,0.00018672369,0.00027339612,0.0001247934,0.21495505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849754,0.00021473701,0.0052942988,0.00062499393,0.000119096454,0.000058955164,0.000031651365,0.000010739748,0.008670106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970114,0.0012574835,0.00013289673,0.00038390196,0.00066074217,0.0005535611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99271387,0.0030089708,0.0017929332,0.0009593385,0.00080150005,0.0007233161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003233047,0.0004895801,0.0005598849,0.0007881168,0.0012151616,0.0030421838,0.00091509573,0.003976073,0.005434165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012792331,0.00036788968,0.00074008055,0.00046789568,0.0038291446,0.0035625666,0.0024769243,0.002845532,0.00041771834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040877807,0.00013297542,0.0036657976,0.00003826435,0.000026939591,0.0007107781,0.0005257454,0.012467837,0.0004413052,0.9732161,0.0015053,0.0072280206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000574371,0.00006639276,0.002130817,0.000044588654,0.000034148597,0.00058011577,0.00040236133,0.042476952,0.0003208068,0.9465445,0.0073060878,0.00003575198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026162073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022626023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005434165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001683546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014276815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018179059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122578970","doi":"","title":"Gender Convergence in Crime: Evidence From Canadian Adult Offence Charge Data","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Econometrics; Range (aeronautics); Series (stratigraphy); Economics; Engineering; Macroeconomics; Biology","score_opus":0.1433724676789712,"score_gpt":0.31426590018704226,"score_spread":0.17089343250807107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122578970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98733354,0.0007136351,0.0005833653,0.0004115863,0.000014413308,0.000035750658,0.0057612127,0.000013986574,0.0051324745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99201244,0.0006532525,0.0003949248,0.00008295373,0.000013761349,0.00001475976,0.0056173643,0.000009707523,0.0012009033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972452,0.00032795497,0.0001894038,0.00036932444,0.0013429454,0.00052519125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98339593,0.0037344508,0.0038682611,0.0010712775,0.007063471,0.00086670724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026795696,0.00027608735,0.00044671056,0.0039518094,0.0017624593,0.0013121057,0.0010526924,0.00042602018,0.002995364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021419233,0.00020164337,0.00037758498,0.008113791,0.0010274663,0.00058062194,0.0012716546,0.0007468541,0.00030486868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010825029,0.000030035633,0.9751057,0.000065882865,0.00008217267,0.00017226061,0.0036099695,0.00050331705,0.00016944899,0.0009247225,0.002972696,0.016255517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025534946,0.0000065462723,0.99689144,0.000016006137,0.000013845473,0.000035871108,0.000984993,0.0003272704,0.00006512147,0.00006524443,0.0015825137,0.0000086709215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97508526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97977626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024914742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007946147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00788178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057653606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122647962","doi":"10.29173/alr442","title":"Theorizing the Institutional Tortfeasor","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Doctrine; Sociology; Identity (music); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Liability; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03287443537594563,"score_gpt":0.22644810197513504,"score_spread":0.1935736665991894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122647962","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12644102,0.024958773,0.15744394,0.1445327,0.00048336363,0.00017591355,0.00022909846,0.00016469868,0.54557055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9664827,0.009471318,0.008431615,0.0022318133,0.0003808129,0.000107656975,0.00008093976,0.00003224631,0.012780854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99325377,0.0031612045,0.00025456795,0.0008058266,0.0017724729,0.00075210934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938214,0.0030935449,0.0010148458,0.0008371396,0.0007939934,0.0004390736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009296538,0.0003770266,0.00047582257,0.004012503,0.0032908064,0.009256251,0.002506815,0.0036789442,0.0047342544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010012766,0.00042629277,0.00057645567,0.0024448459,0.037352744,0.012293639,0.0048209173,0.003369332,0.00049742777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.2635665e-7,0.0000042570414,0.00021081342,0.000011253525,0.0000016080844,0.000017226046,0.00028231644,0.00035376174,0.000010114838,0.9975327,0.0003664756,0.0012085758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051268353,0.0000054417346,0.00039246253,0.00007999637,0.0000056235144,0.000046091427,0.00074665266,0.00090156397,0.000048655973,0.97678167,0.020981956,0.000004685913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071708737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004816134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009296538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008613349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009409003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062494516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122658586","doi":"","title":"Explaining Difference in the Quantity of Supreme Court Revisions: A Model for Judicial Uniformity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Documentos de Trabajo","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Appeal; Law; Ideology; Political science; Common law; Reputation; Politics","score_opus":0.08323025495706377,"score_gpt":0.2927777245125908,"score_spread":0.20954746955552706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122658586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.640623,0.000782314,0.30440956,0.0075519425,0.00014355163,0.0003616543,0.0009265806,0.00037343317,0.044827975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781269,0.00030028398,0.013639799,0.00024876662,0.0001052833,0.000117525735,0.00013931474,0.000056156394,0.0072660833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99635005,0.001469996,0.00014086232,0.0008376208,0.00035599733,0.00084545737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96736586,0.021315962,0.0056403833,0.0028883028,0.0010291423,0.0017603787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059743123,0.0007229786,0.0013162035,0.0015729713,0.0009415363,0.003853062,0.0031800747,0.0034505464,0.018926406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029525911,0.0007457628,0.0018946979,0.0012050632,0.0034129636,0.0047627385,0.0024644742,0.002629067,0.0015535783],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052583375,0.000626437,0.022233265,0.00022626776,0.00015113785,0.0007511332,0.0009383705,0.3209401,0.0043013575,0.6189621,0.0032750193,0.027068986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024241365,0.0004311845,0.01651593,0.000060450504,0.00009949851,0.00047742345,0.00041270826,0.5316932,0.0006105943,0.44672891,0.002600951,0.00012668777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053639803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003645701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018926406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028400333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012223562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06331515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122725825","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1476","title":"Sentencing the Criminal Corproation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Wrongdoing; Corporation; Incentive; Criminal law; Profit (economics); Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Law; Criminology; Political science; Economics; Business; Sociology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04816489384320308,"score_gpt":0.22088353026347962,"score_spread":0.17271863642027654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122725825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43776345,0.004136939,0.015223318,0.088428885,0.0022128955,0.00015092012,0.00035571118,0.00019205015,0.45153582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9633167,0.0005757937,0.001956497,0.0042146435,0.00055066723,0.000039248545,0.000061957806,0.000019603725,0.029264929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992964,0.0018539431,0.0005021432,0.0006882367,0.0024796273,0.0015120091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99113584,0.0037536914,0.0016367259,0.00075793103,0.001865893,0.0008498574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044892924,0.00027556848,0.000478254,0.0011033093,0.0045248973,0.0039350893,0.0014205993,0.004756141,0.0069111753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027481731,0.00037176925,0.00027802246,0.00043144845,0.0024852077,0.0026294321,0.0026155144,0.0057532955,0.0009907301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013392261,0.00015726847,0.007202916,0.000120250035,0.000030449995,0.0013339445,0.0022839282,0.001842368,0.0011108003,0.87033916,0.038794678,0.07665036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012959511,0.0011631392,0.09283685,0.0011252598,0.00016912869,0.0060464214,0.0057111434,0.0145494165,0.0070568514,0.46344763,0.40748098,0.00028353292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008247155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017381568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008247155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030185764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061438023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0237419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122744593","doi":"","title":"Liability Insurance under the Negligence Rule","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Harm; Liability; Actuarial science; Damages; Strict liability; Business; Liability insurance; Contributory negligence; Economics; Insurance policy; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.060791419487316194,"score_gpt":0.3016430618565751,"score_spread":0.24085164236925888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122744593","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34889445,0.0017085335,0.60482156,0.0028911724,0.00008613447,0.00012354818,0.00022453378,0.00015479617,0.041095283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97109896,0.0007063671,0.02263133,0.00017930103,0.00015716377,0.000058043166,0.00009492675,0.000027929607,0.0050460384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929906,0.0029243855,0.00039992505,0.0009939104,0.0017786401,0.0009125668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564823,0.03243464,0.0045926687,0.0039933603,0.001884814,0.0006123041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009757289,0.0007525198,0.0015778051,0.0013895279,0.0007192262,0.0027634178,0.0014326096,0.0019404986,0.0025943087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040268414,0.00047677007,0.0010681485,0.0011552426,0.0038627489,0.0036194837,0.0023605016,0.001888467,0.0005510154],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083852305,0.00008897178,0.003628085,0.000089421,0.000080484475,0.00032361058,0.00014262818,0.083703704,0.0011811833,0.8920315,0.00095616013,0.017690394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067112385,0.00008464599,0.0015620446,0.000035050154,0.000051193318,0.00025836073,0.00003660897,0.24135374,0.0011659688,0.7540248,0.0013379862,0.00002254607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014929469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057678216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009757289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019436614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014142543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051602125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122750115","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2018.03.002","title":"Financially-constrained lawyers: An economic theory of legal disputes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Plaintiff; Economic Justice; Welfare; Social Welfare; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Public economics","score_opus":0.03168822734550531,"score_gpt":0.23643097709664612,"score_spread":0.20474274975114082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122750115","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36697677,0.0043827877,0.43600515,0.060321283,0.0003835822,0.00028574816,0.00080679375,0.00014472865,0.13069318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814718,0.0013200891,0.0074114264,0.00056017016,0.0002643703,0.00008941438,0.00007528836,0.000022287735,0.008785124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978027,0.0012511768,0.00007903767,0.00022502644,0.00032496927,0.0003172165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901838,0.0066899504,0.0013442033,0.00039723094,0.0005525685,0.0008323527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039861244,0.0006330847,0.0012923362,0.0013429257,0.0017079966,0.00543558,0.002760887,0.0048071053,0.009436864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01680902,0.0007644056,0.0010202049,0.001183256,0.0052614263,0.008191132,0.0021017392,0.0033325455,0.00043314774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001639755,0.00003498968,0.00047756513,0.00002260304,0.000014693567,0.00004697657,0.00016942098,0.020668035,0.00007005919,0.9751789,0.0015747031,0.0017256953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030324698,0.000008224079,0.00037688552,0.000020146024,0.000009916282,0.000024567084,0.00013007059,0.07581797,0.000022464315,0.9223441,0.0012032972,0.000012044355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009542763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069864662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009542763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037488863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032353727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03156948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122872171","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2006.0009","title":"Law-Making in Small Jurisdictions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Simple (philosophy); Faith; Legal culture; Law; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0167603221118748,"score_gpt":0.1801361238520556,"score_spread":0.1633758017401808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122872171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06710967,0.00778944,0.028319227,0.032667767,0.000504606,0.00016855133,0.00024044783,0.00013911806,0.86306113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95277613,0.0017528761,0.003538114,0.001304898,0.0002817804,0.00009002696,0.00007975148,0.00002004603,0.040156316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606943,0.0017564204,0.00021912614,0.000761751,0.0007380613,0.00045525222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99464357,0.0031962348,0.0005406581,0.0005636839,0.00064594974,0.00040989602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040364154,0.000184368,0.0004238397,0.0011888354,0.0055919,0.008670008,0.001871474,0.002774924,0.01785378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075217327,0.0002616574,0.00046846535,0.0020333864,0.019574212,0.004895407,0.004409594,0.0028172627,0.0009935815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000421223,0.000006406844,0.00023125428,0.000020191284,0.0000024379076,0.00008442066,0.0013890411,0.00037809176,0.00005257348,0.99281377,0.0019510806,0.003066552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011138248,0.000024268615,0.0013320381,0.00024734848,0.000011605074,0.00008612131,0.0023502118,0.001630005,0.0002435497,0.8123208,0.18172352,0.000019344736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014962229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014803263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01785378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070958915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007690292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059726775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122967095","doi":"10.1093/jleo/ewz016","title":"Social Norms and Legal Design","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Economics and Organization","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Enforcement; Deterrence theory; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Deterrence (psychology); Law enforcement; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.019333938138545434,"score_gpt":0.18902008151564215,"score_spread":0.1696861433770967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122967095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09168437,0.0046019615,0.3948216,0.047275703,0.00050681835,0.0003816277,0.00043627998,0.00034206797,0.4599496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95075655,0.0011781768,0.03707283,0.0009945225,0.00022943196,0.00026942784,0.00013732187,0.000050712613,0.009311022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809414,0.012565852,0.0010593539,0.0020968118,0.0024900269,0.0008465429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553865,0.028756158,0.005480685,0.0041933437,0.004676634,0.0015067329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014798165,0.0005229763,0.00067246053,0.0035619705,0.0037329257,0.009105484,0.0015615025,0.0036781614,0.008501538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031503204,0.00040857578,0.0006713693,0.002490021,0.029480709,0.0069930092,0.0037707966,0.0022271276,0.0006804279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027582626,0.0000058528112,0.00027766658,0.000016842687,0.0000044018348,0.00001609237,0.00025365414,0.00057726796,0.000025899508,0.99617875,0.0003219785,0.0023187804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008172272,0.0000060926664,0.00013913872,0.00002553829,0.0000034494417,0.000020635494,0.00020111227,0.001347279,0.000043758144,0.9904265,0.0077738706,0.0000044788467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003683318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028195921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014798165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070216963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051111514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07826114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122985120","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3103156","title":"Prediction, Judgment and Complexity: A Theory of Decision Making and Artificial Intelligence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Stochastic game; Computer science; Action (physics); Process (computing); Artificial intelligence; Field (mathematics); State (computer science); Machine learning; Management science; Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.0576531901794105,"score_gpt":0.24841686819918588,"score_spread":0.19076367801977537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122985120","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080117285,0.015022013,0.8337768,0.030089067,0.0005527331,0.00018147122,0.0005481328,0.00021341973,0.039499134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90128905,0.004858909,0.08914222,0.0012148964,0.0009970599,0.00031873115,0.00027155457,0.00004910135,0.0018584201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913352,0.004834211,0.0004913789,0.0010782524,0.0019286317,0.0003323663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92731005,0.06572563,0.002315959,0.002008304,0.0018684582,0.0007716473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010026053,0.0012700127,0.0020663745,0.0035255335,0.0012965879,0.010196457,0.0022496928,0.003099551,0.0041248617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056493692,0.00060871436,0.0016527757,0.0032140026,0.012786034,0.013708742,0.0025611292,0.0035802482,0.00047378137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008890533,0.00009044536,0.0032751425,0.00031454847,0.00016577342,0.000076830656,0.00076199905,0.028522195,0.00020802264,0.93480676,0.0020535055,0.029635878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011958659,0.000010982531,0.00038810205,0.000026066838,0.000012502807,0.000018442002,0.000058990434,0.021687994,0.000038082006,0.97703177,0.00070402515,0.000011243606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021874853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010196457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033808805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003009027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053023458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122991222","doi":"10.1023/a:1011204301421","title":"Settlement Disputes: Evidence from a Legal Practice Perspective","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Law and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Punitive damages; Jury; Context (archaeology); Principal (computer security); Law; Economics; Plaintiff; Business; Damages; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.04519471473868699,"score_gpt":0.24178472938561188,"score_spread":0.19659001464692488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122991222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6255849,0.012154447,0.009484159,0.035641037,0.00029744976,0.00037490117,0.0005916922,0.000042481162,0.31582895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928046,0.0017332071,0.00075617083,0.0012630237,0.0002005562,0.000087708984,0.00011893151,0.000009100807,0.0030267795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94726807,0.027232992,0.0046699448,0.0035709871,0.013435238,0.003822745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46695623,0.43467268,0.06562063,0.011644511,0.016710864,0.0043950514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04237198,0.00039160738,0.0011378417,0.0068961796,0.005615668,0.00853473,0.0033383348,0.01273676,0.026211949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28644553,0.000829328,0.0007314807,0.008029017,0.013530067,0.011755087,0.0065025073,0.0066115144,0.0027562957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016557946,0.0024746414,0.08931295,0.0010443274,0.0002680964,0.0023850766,0.04515476,0.0014464703,0.0005605679,0.7565474,0.016839264,0.08231069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023508195,0.0012403895,0.13453747,0.00271216,0.0005275991,0.005859462,0.07518724,0.0054843347,0.0013424669,0.6687334,0.101854585,0.00017013925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034287812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033901378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04237198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002508233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042871656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22408712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123027529","doi":"","title":"Law without the State: Legal Attributes and the Coordination of Decentralized Collective Punishment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Order (exchange); Politics; Democracy; Function (biology); State (computer science); Political science; Law; Private law; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.010714076772843457,"score_gpt":0.20207454251644194,"score_spread":0.1913604657435985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123027529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51226133,0.0009274822,0.17717901,0.01635691,0.00012656528,0.00017702268,0.0002506884,0.00015606264,0.2925649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99478996,0.00011265073,0.003532707,0.00008768504,0.000032508196,0.000026739903,0.000017823202,0.0000105285335,0.0013894313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729025,0.0011988173,0.000121275945,0.0005218752,0.00044733475,0.0004204536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895706,0.0040102056,0.0033163202,0.0016130202,0.0005683286,0.000921453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045962213,0.00019216628,0.0005458107,0.0013261297,0.0020442312,0.005377549,0.0009833698,0.0023051624,0.0056596105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014328907,0.0002471994,0.00049397704,0.0015057628,0.0105485525,0.006475222,0.002731545,0.0018684177,0.00029522975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021079895,0.000024808072,0.0015771288,0.000013438842,0.000007383765,0.00007300383,0.00067440065,0.005402408,0.00021310759,0.98821217,0.0003913351,0.0033896184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003137674,0.000026375092,0.0058200415,0.000023524537,0.000009338417,0.00006611987,0.00065804337,0.014911802,0.00013057794,0.97428435,0.004023509,0.000014894949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004464572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037394396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056596105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032034866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030327921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02430743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123252993","doi":"","title":"Can Making It Harder to Convict Criminals Ever Reduce Crime","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Convict; Burden of proof; Conviction; Incentive; Payment; Deterrence (psychology); Criminal Conviction; Order (exchange); Actuarial science; Criminology; Computer security; Business; Economics; Political science; Law; Psychology; Computer science; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.035308372187963656,"score_gpt":0.25560653284605295,"score_spread":0.2202981606580893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123252993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7142779,0.004241904,0.031219104,0.1452034,0.0013238011,0.00017294419,0.00053065,0.00055426016,0.10247595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786653,0.0011123193,0.0069161453,0.0063550393,0.0009955432,0.0000836621,0.00014478112,0.000060610775,0.005666562],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562776,0.0018393185,0.00018418374,0.0005229981,0.00078859343,0.0010370918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95507437,0.021103963,0.013591272,0.0040299613,0.0022742925,0.0039261077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005106369,0.0007835552,0.0009936616,0.0013527838,0.0010480628,0.0025873245,0.0014202821,0.005249269,0.013293652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060562752,0.0004828233,0.00050722156,0.0008323463,0.0028493295,0.0046546306,0.0026433985,0.0015325492,0.0040944736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022238106,0.0047417274,0.11021262,0.0018235992,0.0009598917,0.0014394271,0.0035142365,0.04522003,0.019845827,0.28218314,0.07220303,0.4556326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009510299,0.003658829,0.2884778,0.00070952973,0.00051319867,0.0025566295,0.0037412653,0.023249896,0.008235271,0.5379783,0.12956494,0.00036337765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021943874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026689856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013293652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008186697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018521098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04447168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123269018","doi":"10.3386/w25095","title":"Optimal Law Enforcement with Ordered Leniency","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Law enforcement; Enforcement; Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.24480679986222514,"score_gpt":0.4093579367259377,"score_spread":0.16455113686371253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123269018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60497487,0.0013461107,0.3450572,0.0054932763,0.00024849598,0.00078629254,0.00037981037,0.00067109085,0.04104291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709991,0.00034421554,0.020072415,0.00056635466,0.000077719706,0.00014592805,0.00007225264,0.000042200096,0.0076797875],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932836,0.002818028,0.00037933968,0.0011289503,0.0008950445,0.0014950192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796776,0.011059186,0.0046969634,0.0016380892,0.001457974,0.0014702191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049719457,0.0012008814,0.0018114452,0.0011147913,0.0008084856,0.0030808363,0.0016584109,0.0023689892,0.0035345694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03010337,0.0010796362,0.00050485996,0.00066415576,0.002409863,0.0034694162,0.0021847102,0.0020514072,0.0006428822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001373447,0.0016906734,0.009910599,0.0004547965,0.00022294428,0.00059230527,0.0005461702,0.65675527,0.005184398,0.24290317,0.0047474545,0.07561877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005126915,0.000830922,0.004497314,0.000102485996,0.00007422564,0.00016175242,0.0004207224,0.7266751,0.0021352991,0.26033515,0.004171119,0.000083213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041568577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026844803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049719457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002945349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034258252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02629453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123353348","doi":"","title":"Priority Queuing on the Docket: Universality of Judicial Dispute Resolution Timing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Remand (court procedure); Certiorari; Original jurisdiction; Majority opinion","score_opus":0.02731605389919944,"score_gpt":0.22744064382220028,"score_spread":0.20012458992300083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123353348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9481429,0.0011177686,0.039821986,0.00091731694,0.00005084091,0.000072698145,0.00040098408,0.00021320439,0.0092622945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777824,0.000120928424,0.001235885,0.000047370526,0.000026879685,0.000010002814,0.00014993829,0.000023570985,0.00060723675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955124,0.0011138634,0.00035058171,0.0013502204,0.0010183696,0.00065456453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90883344,0.056892432,0.019966831,0.0070488737,0.0038723224,0.003386069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009514048,0.00019152844,0.00089209777,0.0026364292,0.0010286734,0.0038946264,0.0017803515,0.0011062435,0.005642101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.119002335,0.00064248586,0.00048252995,0.0026877832,0.0019802595,0.0035061862,0.0015475927,0.0025323853,0.00076643407],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061338936,0.00029257016,0.74472153,0.00020596762,0.00028169973,0.00061710284,0.004865268,0.031333484,0.0062494157,0.108418435,0.0032067052,0.09919444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000808241,0.00025866868,0.79310817,0.000109959976,0.00011182301,0.00072454644,0.0023699675,0.090631686,0.00216355,0.10395054,0.0063087977,0.0001815889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013027111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009343917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013027111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021568297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001264278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050315678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123355475","doi":"","title":"Employee Pension Rights and the False Promiseof Trust Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.03449696587863101,"score_gpt":0.2066261916260386,"score_spread":0.17212922574740758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123355475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18469326,0.0068752016,0.02015826,0.3447943,0.00070034014,0.000053727752,0.0003606031,0.00007607977,0.44228816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809699,0.0007066094,0.00055131764,0.00505598,0.0004017429,0.000019372927,0.00002283146,0.000014112598,0.01225824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993129,0.0024089273,0.00032689582,0.00089463,0.0014658518,0.0017746435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763826,0.015605576,0.0022174665,0.0031320895,0.0018311754,0.0008310718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01290048,0.00025941042,0.0006377323,0.00083599077,0.005886837,0.010656446,0.001261804,0.013639305,0.010378162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037825912,0.0006251,0.00043765496,0.0008876442,0.019363122,0.0119453855,0.0036191223,0.009724104,0.0006907323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014258728,0.0000086577875,0.0003855287,0.0000064765895,0.0000027837648,0.00004308971,0.00045468638,0.00011006953,0.000024727613,0.9942941,0.0031018127,0.0015537696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018208762,0.000008104894,0.00075961504,0.000038581824,0.000008748783,0.00004488341,0.0004609581,0.0006992928,0.00013130967,0.9811943,0.016618267,0.000017779596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01748136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017799461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01748136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080317855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065862956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068225086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123358802","doi":"","title":"The Effects of Remand and Bail on Efficient Sentences","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Deterrence (psychology); Remand (court procedure); Prison; Economics; Psychology; Actuarial science; Econometrics; Computer science; Criminology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.009731518736449904,"score_gpt":0.20449512928834215,"score_spread":0.19476361055189226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123358802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.868075,0.0033866144,0.0523721,0.0039178208,0.0001811962,0.00029360346,0.0016531238,0.0003554558,0.06976507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903328,0.00042461153,0.0021827228,0.00019272814,0.00006695457,0.000082322316,0.00012358902,0.00003862548,0.006555573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99513716,0.0026555518,0.00025634211,0.0004465708,0.000482721,0.0010217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92398065,0.05515351,0.013584763,0.002575895,0.0021282744,0.002576852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013341991,0.00091981044,0.0018571881,0.0015426808,0.00082597265,0.0020530762,0.0011377817,0.0016165475,0.012827806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06751615,0.00047904465,0.0011330977,0.0006790791,0.0022675518,0.0038405312,0.0016449835,0.0026445414,0.0006863235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003276877,0.0010727956,0.015015732,0.00075096684,0.00047864547,0.0016698388,0.0012812852,0.15411064,0.006564238,0.7336646,0.008742978,0.07337134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009444606,0.007511958,0.084244065,0.0002988971,0.00083106186,0.0011635158,0.0010689854,0.22144397,0.0044051264,0.6694366,0.008333473,0.00031794666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018773155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002422409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013341991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022823059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013811213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07056004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123401757","doi":"10.1086/724800","title":"Do Private Prisons Affect Criminal Sentencing?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Straddle; Salience (neuroscience); Affect (linguistics); Criminology; Sentence; Panel data; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Economics; Econometrics; Computer science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.049211038550918185,"score_gpt":0.2392113001398273,"score_spread":0.19000026158890912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123401757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987356,0.00006368006,0.000128203,0.0002611418,0.0000061041947,0.0000061623996,0.00025730432,0.00000244008,0.0005393333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946684,0.00002846079,0.000044098764,0.00002985403,0.000012839495,0.000004776084,0.00015160389,0.0000014368304,0.00026001493],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955656,0.00231159,0.0002957419,0.00073020527,0.00034972405,0.0007471185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973705,0.008522817,0.012721421,0.0013988493,0.0011578926,0.0024940644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003202217,0.00017848052,0.00068294664,0.00083719764,0.0008048019,0.0018013536,0.00066547206,0.0010310924,0.004412821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018577771,0.00036498895,0.00046689858,0.00086353254,0.0007619743,0.0012053307,0.0014350729,0.00091764086,0.0004327171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002214429,0.00011877301,0.9944436,0.000016456135,0.00015884977,0.000098890334,0.0006318925,0.00045620278,0.00026137827,0.0003697641,0.00035655036,0.0028661457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008277331,0.000066429115,0.99839836,0.0000072396383,0.000039844414,0.00003425588,0.00047512865,0.00045950827,0.00007071552,0.00016030432,0.00027392487,0.000006066582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01901085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038940426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01901085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086165324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006691429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03780037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123407023","doi":"","title":"Dynamic Incentives and Retirement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Earnings; Term (time); Compensation (psychology); Contractible space; Economics; Labour economics; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.011457629015024272,"score_gpt":0.2163554396565465,"score_spread":0.2048978106415222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123407023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85851115,0.006469442,0.03154191,0.00859535,0.00018105065,0.00008345976,0.00059666915,0.000059529164,0.09396137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931552,0.0006626943,0.0008002246,0.00011924033,0.000057369652,0.000012742507,0.000052136624,0.0000034436598,0.005136953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999087,0.00028937365,0.00005612718,0.00012751659,0.00016872305,0.00027131927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99390924,0.0024278797,0.0023802891,0.00041006823,0.00038992107,0.0004825262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002455232,0.00017807815,0.0002976626,0.0007249183,0.0008281052,0.0017363168,0.00046412498,0.001249951,0.005865978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013120789,0.00016059664,0.00026012864,0.00070370414,0.0010817132,0.0018752131,0.0011172183,0.0009812284,0.00035822947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020375155,0.00018543267,0.043794945,0.00010099342,0.000035054738,0.00036934743,0.0009904858,0.017395545,0.0006792133,0.87375283,0.0025174278,0.059975065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008503209,0.00030214968,0.08934203,0.00020404246,0.00004800823,0.0007196612,0.0015659377,0.030818254,0.0007379854,0.8352521,0.040848877,0.00007579937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022234377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018524792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005865978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016735817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013882767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019623697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123433587","doi":"","title":"Settlement Escrows: An Experimental Study of a Bilateral Bargaining Game","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Escrow; Settlement (finance); Institution; Certainty; Actuarial science; Economics; Quality (philosophy); Microeconomics; Business; Political science; Law; Finance; Mathematics","score_opus":0.023096604744642844,"score_gpt":0.241227101423891,"score_spread":0.21813049667924816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123433587","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97321767,0.00010489755,0.01684725,0.00037603642,0.00016444839,0.0012699167,0.00016213323,0.000058059348,0.007799574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721638,0.0001685279,0.021843676,0.00037999108,0.00012550486,0.0023791576,0.00013825337,0.00003823712,0.002762868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99001807,0.0055329804,0.00066349393,0.0012208865,0.0018946303,0.00066985184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9099735,0.0735494,0.007165072,0.00622742,0.0012213285,0.0018633301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014073284,0.0014005202,0.001692276,0.00071742304,0.0016095694,0.0022850446,0.0020663491,0.002793719,0.010976891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05531566,0.0007551749,0.0010388963,0.00090588274,0.0034663985,0.00397444,0.002137422,0.0049773743,0.0007378426],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07174948,0.21941599,0.031197509,0.0029668433,0.0020592685,0.0025500883,0.017683916,0.092155874,0.15160562,0.26284266,0.0056684925,0.1401043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03771907,0.23437412,0.035885517,0.00041076256,0.0011637484,0.001353333,0.005190547,0.3007364,0.06421356,0.29817232,0.020021623,0.00075905974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00061961036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047055157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014073284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097483804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014461612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074427545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123452466","doi":"10.1016/j.irle.2012.10.003","title":"Tracking inconsistent judicial behavior","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Law and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Arbitration; Ideology; Politics; Law; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Phenomenon; Law and economics; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; History; Epistemology","score_opus":0.055433112362040377,"score_gpt":0.27142280186912787,"score_spread":0.2159896895070875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123452466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87770706,0.0028967229,0.07599395,0.0047027464,0.00040031064,0.00016144948,0.006455205,0.0007401123,0.03094234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98855025,0.0003133963,0.007278015,0.00021810236,0.00006500244,0.000050112663,0.0011371633,0.00004527509,0.0023426733],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958871,0.0017921965,0.00022336429,0.0010608124,0.0007919292,0.00024465861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95661,0.02108061,0.010286919,0.005455458,0.0056239087,0.00094301475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066908957,0.00036551754,0.0008845166,0.0029604887,0.0008532185,0.0026691584,0.0010959333,0.0014789588,0.004429545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059651595,0.00035015141,0.0002267018,0.0026544982,0.0006241141,0.0023056222,0.0009506385,0.0019844426,0.0012970133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008324914,0.00060043164,0.58591926,0.00021126488,0.00032852608,0.00031911212,0.0009932803,0.029266387,0.003507105,0.07160853,0.03683276,0.26958084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015205001,0.00026213744,0.20463024,0.00023871257,0.00024497314,0.00041601254,0.0010281798,0.5894588,0.004769157,0.17414832,0.024555724,0.0000956952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006931295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010024936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006931295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001287955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015442815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03538525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123491429","doi":"","title":"The Fable of Fisher Body","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Production (economics); Opportunism; Economics; Investment (military); Transaction cost; Database transaction; Interpretation (philosophy); Microeconomics; Business; Industrial organization; Computer science; Market economy","score_opus":0.02554764164532141,"score_gpt":0.20305149015659604,"score_spread":0.17750384851127463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123491429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05581065,0.0052281744,0.0050444053,0.066492066,0.0010954299,0.00003618794,0.00023282046,0.00019969665,0.8658605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32128376,0.0018421888,0.0014618841,0.007729864,0.00023366489,0.000021011458,0.0000801412,0.000067492096,0.6672801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992974,0.00008346415,0.000015776535,0.0001695927,0.000249652,0.00018412503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996051,0.000106513486,0.000058802478,0.00004809513,0.000112855276,0.000068646885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010232818,0.00041001866,0.00017730199,0.00064419926,0.0056555145,0.0024966577,0.00040417004,0.003081491,0.03139381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026517527,0.00026248847,0.00018486122,0.0004319464,0.0059511904,0.003435192,0.0022092306,0.0020421767,0.005233159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003204186,0.000011784597,0.0019169353,0.00003257048,0.0000032638716,0.00057281967,0.003955725,0.00019104271,0.00061022764,0.79622215,0.16090134,0.035550095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005073043,0.0000299523,0.003173387,0.00012732537,0.000004167936,0.00040570143,0.001630987,0.00029788946,0.00069571217,0.062278535,0.9313372,0.000014046918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054709036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09243064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054709036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061229668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004775746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10878122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123491991","doi":"","title":"Menu Theorems for Bilateral Contracting","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Set (abstract data type); Stochastic game; Mathematical economics; Bayesian probability; Bayesian game; Computer science; Bayesian inference; Sequential equilibrium; Mathematics; Game theory; Equilibrium selection; Repeated game; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.055819042288730476,"score_gpt":0.29957214597932236,"score_spread":0.2437531036905919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123491991","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035084296,0.0020285072,0.77020675,0.002350936,0.00031662482,0.00014204795,0.0004437854,0.00040321855,0.18902391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7571013,0.0037102702,0.20007637,0.0013511888,0.00095998106,0.00088785,0.0006933416,0.00032793425,0.034891814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655366,0.0015263635,0.00015292504,0.000425007,0.0009280315,0.00041405857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99371535,0.0040727905,0.0006066553,0.00068300916,0.000578453,0.00034384563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052710706,0.00078095,0.0009095762,0.0020768663,0.0024164394,0.00368438,0.0017472061,0.0019714246,0.018638575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013043079,0.00047110746,0.0017308325,0.0019525031,0.003722202,0.008917847,0.0034798922,0.003333575,0.0024822378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050675126,0.0000037747006,0.00003949725,0.000012124005,0.0000037025634,0.000011783432,0.000042324038,0.00084139465,0.000055771805,0.99621433,0.0004950063,0.0022751566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011561057,0.0000072315866,0.00005434568,0.000013194571,0.0000035487685,0.000038620194,0.000022110153,0.0070353365,0.000063747386,0.9891769,0.003567988,0.000005336022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015051657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006789989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018638575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021964158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012966489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06235224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123493184","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2902780","title":"Holdup, Holdout and Royalty Stacking: A Review of the Literature","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Stacking; Law and economics; Business; Computer science; Economics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05213273745112327,"score_gpt":0.283799011830701,"score_spread":0.23166627437957774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123493184","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017365173,0.99833435,0.000070285336,0.0007494029,0.000079785954,0.0000017073661,0.000019447747,0.0000014408168,0.0005699743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002400723,0.99662316,0.000080652506,0.000340505,0.00033509557,0.0000027488134,0.000022065828,0.0000020873135,0.00019291024],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984112,0.00037738035,0.0002471725,0.00029977236,0.0005615609,0.000102916325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98527133,0.010936339,0.0019824589,0.0002329517,0.0013210294,0.00025593815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003715898,0.0008855526,0.0022510043,0.0041502737,0.0006039957,0.003302521,0.0018834602,0.0028538909,0.0068787336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014978543,0.00059256144,0.00079728354,0.008387712,0.00328941,0.0043145893,0.0013726464,0.0023051251,0.001164591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023294771,0.00010219027,0.0023720285,0.0428052,0.00032015986,0.0002013435,0.00018720355,0.0010309201,0.00021858946,0.036513463,0.04120548,0.87481046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007054089,0.00022081766,0.012662449,0.0595491,0.0009390923,0.0017234902,0.00057570584,0.0005030785,0.0005223228,0.046187147,0.87692505,0.00012123776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005088214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007938659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068787336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019311181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006291318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023011684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123522990","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2245976","title":"Transactions Costs and the Employment Contract in the US Economy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Labour economics; Economics","score_opus":0.010266775637621918,"score_gpt":0.19543142338447228,"score_spread":0.18516464774685037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123522990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9040479,0.0068374975,0.006225951,0.023111634,0.00013024072,0.000038089333,0.0009952467,0.000039138788,0.058574364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99444324,0.0012683889,0.00023853833,0.00020184088,0.00008663122,0.000010779264,0.000111123016,0.0000079734655,0.0036314887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986534,0.0005691601,0.00014487564,0.00009116875,0.00028343854,0.00025791235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811513,0.01285514,0.0031680632,0.00049132516,0.0011480143,0.0011862185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002628332,0.00016392516,0.00035795465,0.0017486513,0.0013521983,0.0045875274,0.00059924246,0.0022029108,0.012403278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022059271,0.00033121198,0.00036708967,0.0031958732,0.0021850679,0.004678946,0.0012898097,0.002024863,0.00047231023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004732952,0.00018800852,0.04402884,0.00010840931,0.000051724586,0.00041458572,0.0010211105,0.03204713,0.00027787898,0.88467276,0.009828257,0.026888005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011580023,0.00008861683,0.048016086,0.00017354701,0.00007026004,0.00035378817,0.0022059875,0.047451396,0.00025211863,0.88954353,0.011657876,0.00007096523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02402977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020301754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02402977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037938717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035054702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0477798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123623902","doi":"","title":"The Data-Driven Future of International Economic Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Empirical legal studies; Frontier; Data science; Empirical research; Reading (process); Legal research; Focus (optics); Political science; Computer science; Public relations; Management science; Law; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.022097092083716293,"score_gpt":0.24120263527831273,"score_spread":0.21910554319459644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123623902","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009355746,0.060538247,0.27241683,0.57908106,0.007202677,0.00029583316,0.0036846031,0.00047448123,0.066950455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39619517,0.09436116,0.36523813,0.09754927,0.02690487,0.0024153576,0.004549891,0.00076955464,0.012016571],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92863977,0.051352147,0.002781878,0.0044745663,0.011958919,0.0007926934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6383302,0.31005886,0.0062178015,0.028408768,0.013977775,0.003006572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08338168,0.0007942962,0.0020916387,0.0059191277,0.00320047,0.02271652,0.003798441,0.005692308,0.0060272887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2138448,0.0010299829,0.0012052866,0.009318272,0.022965502,0.04260034,0.0077271936,0.01808917,0.001490842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013798476,0.000022580185,0.00070125016,0.00016716766,0.000016214215,0.00002450509,0.00040385383,0.0004726404,0.000028121682,0.95872635,0.01392856,0.02549499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007720912,0.000010952102,0.00034853708,0.00037051277,0.0000069457633,0.000025945254,0.00029981157,0.0020061056,0.00006556363,0.93657726,0.060256768,0.00002390542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025116568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019436132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08338168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00811743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009671134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44096977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123646660","doi":"","title":"What is a Gang and Why Does the Law Care","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Harm; Criminal Conviction; Criminal law; Criminology; Economics; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.019378430315911813,"score_gpt":0.18789389863583172,"score_spread":0.16851546831991993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123646660","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2701906,0.003995596,0.005797256,0.4647657,0.0020847155,0.00009395438,0.00052364526,0.00014014977,0.25240833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611658,0.0025952128,0.0010583475,0.014526427,0.00077684876,0.000033610853,0.00014118184,0.00008467393,0.019617924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969472,0.0010987256,0.00009137967,0.00037185074,0.00056773593,0.00092308584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899741,0.0020242862,0.0019430813,0.00089306326,0.0013610318,0.0038043847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026640478,0.00019446645,0.0004809505,0.0017101527,0.007074586,0.006131332,0.0008617001,0.0027686579,0.016844211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019881507,0.00022925215,0.00040779426,0.0018321353,0.012305666,0.006128915,0.0029207075,0.002937381,0.0027204768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010251318,0.00032632463,0.08369653,0.00022920372,0.00008353822,0.0010675845,0.026039397,0.00038324302,0.0001939279,0.6630596,0.1036944,0.12112384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069316295,0.00006903888,0.048176575,0.0009960303,0.000062990475,0.0015327064,0.061050173,0.0008243082,0.00021026524,0.5765182,0.31041992,0.0000704731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021999568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034012605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021999568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030618561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005018171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056349516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123700776","doi":"10.3386/w11269","title":"Protection for Sale with Imperfect Rent Capturing","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Imperfect; Grossman; Tariff; Economics; Econometrics; Measure (data warehouse); Specification; Econometric model; Microeconomics; Computer science; International trade; Database","score_opus":0.2685246981584221,"score_gpt":0.40198273156084213,"score_spread":0.13345803340242002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123700776","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6838208,0.0012475434,0.19473067,0.0034907297,0.00009157357,0.00025839382,0.0035467455,0.0005922252,0.1122214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941256,0.00010374155,0.002169667,0.0000935523,0.000032120657,0.000022178805,0.0002692414,0.000028410115,0.003155375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607617,0.000883825,0.00020659476,0.00085490884,0.0009656095,0.0010128911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843327,0.006280478,0.00404998,0.0041914354,0.00075619767,0.00038936303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038389955,0.0005159417,0.0015299196,0.0010573373,0.0006345045,0.004301495,0.0020894213,0.0017845129,0.01677863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027508559,0.00065205916,0.0015384963,0.0014382949,0.0022393877,0.004770826,0.0022024624,0.0020371394,0.0017313433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003755395,0.00020647496,0.06842766,0.00033884257,0.00022354175,0.0008647571,0.0006484355,0.076076716,0.0020509707,0.78665817,0.009121713,0.055007175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020581884,0.0003485379,0.09640328,0.00016894068,0.00033550512,0.002356529,0.00062628445,0.30578113,0.0033483692,0.5655466,0.02475685,0.0001221183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009193355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00471377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01677863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002152576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013165127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05613005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123720603","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3175321","title":"Laws and Norms: Experimental Evidence with Liability Rules","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Harm; Strict liability; Liability; Damages; Business; Law and economics; Tort; Legal liability; Action (physics); Economics; Actuarial science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03470737999050898,"score_gpt":0.24997450029826462,"score_spread":0.21526712030775563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123720603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9104117,0.0015735669,0.01198298,0.006142536,0.00039862303,0.0002360356,0.0009055714,0.000058521724,0.068290494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914684,0.00056364003,0.0026688226,0.0010453981,0.00029927786,0.00017863508,0.00047422186,0.000049369664,0.0032521735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832123,0.009475625,0.0013172243,0.0024330695,0.003008058,0.00055381976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4371116,0.4594077,0.05276682,0.039743662,0.0076140575,0.0033561764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02722031,0.000670446,0.0010491431,0.0010188766,0.0014788257,0.0043329443,0.0024110565,0.0038519844,0.034417383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2674909,0.00072619854,0.00065378414,0.0011578398,0.007650738,0.00645313,0.0023675966,0.0041725165,0.0024133115],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025572255,0.027651872,0.1332657,0.0033077635,0.00241157,0.0011752538,0.010552369,0.018235927,0.011758021,0.6154462,0.026558116,0.124065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008299354,0.0049776062,0.12997486,0.00047506345,0.0013031482,0.0006923401,0.002468825,0.016563626,0.007939267,0.8072665,0.019752212,0.00028725158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001758437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017232307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034417383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009849083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012231726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14395648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123730222","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1007173","title":"Privatized Firms, Rule of Law and Labor Outcomes in Emerging Markets","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Labour law; Business; Economics; Labour economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01047996955103153,"score_gpt":0.21817549471186665,"score_spread":0.20769552516083511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123730222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959274,0.00032819726,0.00019532623,0.0016386869,0.000011302819,0.000009191161,0.00014673971,0.0000044067883,0.0017388538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928707,0.00011089318,0.000012346084,0.0000652878,0.000020372652,0.000002657542,0.00006627623,0.0000011427767,0.00043391812],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992912,0.00018564782,0.00005686983,0.00008612258,0.0000759606,0.00030421873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703314,0.011925392,0.01280369,0.0006673464,0.0008471333,0.0034249942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022612012,0.00013210268,0.00053483,0.0008433894,0.0012205144,0.0036526166,0.0005849902,0.0017664159,0.011058781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012773466,0.00018052875,0.00025926577,0.0012362542,0.002173217,0.0026788649,0.0013788319,0.0022937024,0.0004908328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010038256,0.0015256867,0.9258147,0.00006917755,0.00016732932,0.001092143,0.0016386996,0.0059501906,0.0006133414,0.045957986,0.0031404635,0.013026478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026906352,0.00038529185,0.90398914,0.00007543213,0.000101295074,0.00022926094,0.0050181607,0.00903238,0.00039972493,0.07840395,0.0020478754,0.00004852017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011759038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017895317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011759038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011774095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019529448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03699529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123791578","doi":"10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01209.x","title":"The Paradox of “Fraud‐on‐the‐Market Theory”: Who Relies on the Efficiency of Market Prices?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Endogeneity; Damages; Market efficiency; Economics; Profit (economics); Efficient-market hypothesis; Microeconomics; Financial economics; Stock market; Econometrics; Law","score_opus":0.09351026016447354,"score_gpt":0.2795344347899108,"score_spread":0.18602417462543724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123791578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3628388,0.00606507,0.17328778,0.21660319,0.0006259953,0.00034649135,0.00045936194,0.00030059382,0.23947267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831039,0.00082818914,0.005075248,0.008124727,0.00057392544,0.00006542908,0.00005673301,0.000057918493,0.0021139134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9693605,0.013814385,0.001766601,0.0040218793,0.008652789,0.002383812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7867165,0.14306584,0.026578534,0.028968796,0.012471776,0.0021985208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05710172,0.000564321,0.0019027829,0.0038990409,0.0021418822,0.012021065,0.0034627293,0.006381378,0.0077356407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1721156,0.0006596089,0.001524199,0.002266291,0.030221293,0.02380345,0.004254387,0.008185076,0.0011253672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072666946,0.00010788651,0.009931202,0.000089291825,0.00011072644,0.00015359523,0.0007817994,0.0021971527,0.00011770997,0.9534455,0.006273759,0.0267188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009324628,0.00007326862,0.0069251885,0.00012828373,0.00004999641,0.00021712895,0.0006548288,0.008404336,0.00091746374,0.9732397,0.009248659,0.000047951216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002215737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014690371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05710172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044955877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049700136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30198634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123872813","doi":"10.29173/alr338","title":"Lawyers as Quasi-Public Actors","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Discretion; Professional responsibility; Economic Justice; Law; Legal ethics; Politics; Political science; Professional conduct; Legal profession; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05596244588693303,"score_gpt":0.23798052783219611,"score_spread":0.1820180819452631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123872813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12565368,0.0030776116,0.08624655,0.07410665,0.00042122204,0.00033170328,0.00016448127,0.00038962803,0.70960844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8949674,0.0013272773,0.00609034,0.0042994535,0.0003424895,0.00018426919,0.00008000391,0.000052820036,0.09265599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932627,0.0033844227,0.00015808464,0.0007845459,0.0010991635,0.0013111334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929275,0.003608588,0.0010019721,0.0010148403,0.0006049547,0.00084218953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041652215,0.0001905123,0.0002900043,0.0010412267,0.0040994016,0.011455614,0.0010785152,0.004099602,0.017080866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006569544,0.00077342615,0.00030024545,0.0009797437,0.010006572,0.006839352,0.0026001735,0.0038900233,0.002676592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007095703,0.00003565476,0.0006910594,0.000016765642,0.000004338542,0.00005066901,0.0012557564,0.0002792433,0.00010145536,0.98879355,0.0043268926,0.004437495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009616937,0.000055537566,0.0020501043,0.00012213961,0.00003379425,0.00014675887,0.004152202,0.0033636766,0.00041654607,0.68100727,0.30853406,0.000021749465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073182913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010170291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074353586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066390336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057141185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124014775","doi":"10.3386/w21566","title":"Model Uncertainty and the Effect of Shall-Issue Right-to-Carry Laws on Crime","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Institute for New Economic Thinking","keywords":"Carry (investment); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.21782114085131127,"score_gpt":0.41718730299825657,"score_spread":0.1993661621469453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124014775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96329015,0.0009115842,0.024889717,0.0044209524,0.000093226015,0.000056721212,0.00053348584,0.00006658911,0.005737519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794644,0.00032845238,0.00091004313,0.00014069673,0.000025960711,0.000022101554,0.00019120052,0.000011542848,0.0004236661],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99247473,0.0051326384,0.0003133582,0.0007310264,0.0005778815,0.0007703213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7964574,0.1831133,0.012711824,0.004765221,0.0020836636,0.0008685704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013766228,0.00074598956,0.0013165377,0.000971317,0.0007977704,0.0036160615,0.0013552229,0.0017985641,0.0036733395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09311849,0.0006335995,0.0018076744,0.0009181796,0.0020126826,0.0034185005,0.0020866205,0.003918991,0.00025320225],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012053275,0.000595151,0.16204882,0.00021992446,0.0014389303,0.0004153813,0.0009512182,0.7055772,0.00044223547,0.110618904,0.0026870007,0.013799887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002167056,0.00056039967,0.06646303,0.0002358517,0.00093218195,0.00018432444,0.0014019408,0.72555745,0.001235718,0.19984826,0.0031897938,0.00017430463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016726146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0106227165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016726146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020891489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014435353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072803676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124046534","doi":"","title":"Liability Rules under Evidentiary Uncertainty","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Imperfect; Liability; Strict liability; Incentive; Tort; Actuarial science; Perfect information; Ask price; Economics; Law and economics; Business; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.05319054294514247,"score_gpt":0.29344439458273025,"score_spread":0.24025385163758778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124046534","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13626568,0.0025698263,0.76277936,0.007835617,0.00012449872,0.00017121907,0.0005111894,0.00012420771,0.08961837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9325615,0.0014142485,0.060155906,0.00047237353,0.00041324404,0.0001615693,0.00018183787,0.00003538355,0.0046040006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789122,0.0090940315,0.0017410849,0.0024583912,0.0064279363,0.001366324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91034865,0.06861427,0.009264838,0.006822459,0.004262712,0.0006869882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018819232,0.0006005121,0.0010938147,0.001928711,0.0010497186,0.005540112,0.0020017524,0.0032794476,0.003100323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08317556,0.0005727594,0.0010576209,0.0014409053,0.005611366,0.0068241553,0.0026898778,0.0033529818,0.00061471475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010196514,0.000012664789,0.0003748113,0.000025711597,0.000017253622,0.000052744595,0.00012041196,0.019493954,0.00013366883,0.9750005,0.00038592322,0.0043721055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010171199,0.00000781218,0.00018881101,0.000018753572,0.0000073452507,0.000034293767,0.000018501602,0.025772814,0.00016504237,0.97286564,0.00090392004,0.000006922523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011364223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006269648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018819232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023699268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016628188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09952676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124071740","doi":"10.1093/jleo/ewr021","title":"Subjective Performance Evaluations, Collusion, and Organizational Design","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Economics and Organization","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Collusion; Management; Computer science; Library science; Operations research; Sociology; Economics; Engineering; Industrial organization","score_opus":0.03695808128421392,"score_gpt":0.19919713885495133,"score_spread":0.16223905757073742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124071740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78520507,0.004047594,0.10761703,0.005305737,0.00018381298,0.0002531006,0.00009078574,0.00006706178,0.09722973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99495256,0.00027230292,0.0037637628,0.0001065268,0.000038657618,0.000041263054,0.00001562116,0.000008741659,0.00080045545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773219,0.016644254,0.00090550334,0.0009982113,0.0033666801,0.0007634784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91146666,0.05157023,0.02260581,0.0053761243,0.006143446,0.0028376642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026255643,0.00066165393,0.0005638317,0.002331037,0.0012222508,0.0053252447,0.00054687064,0.0009921947,0.0031300546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07014619,0.0003220835,0.00036079134,0.0011920581,0.006154864,0.0025684678,0.002602997,0.0009651102,0.00024111208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009742299,0.000683081,0.19476862,0.00069312734,0.00052706694,0.00042892224,0.019848293,0.020710452,0.002834196,0.5282453,0.0037535003,0.22653334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021986528,0.001004988,0.15829298,0.00049280585,0.00020411934,0.00036200913,0.007665594,0.034541007,0.0020838883,0.78125745,0.013676872,0.00019844163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001006124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010464725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026255643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024362633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013685634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13885474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124091058","doi":"","title":"How Pension Accrual Affects Job Satisfaction","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Accrual; Job satisfaction; Earnings; Incentive; Work (physics); Pension plan; Actuarial science; Business; Sample (material); Economics; Labour economics; Accounting; Psychology; Finance; Social psychology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.017779628007580647,"score_gpt":0.2078419283114847,"score_spread":0.19006230030390406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124091058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996177,0.000018365354,0.000011171235,0.000037809612,8.1596824e-7,0.0000026780963,0.00006687616,4.6873785e-7,0.00024399442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99972147,0.0000153527,0.000011435607,0.000010716134,0.0000010286954,0.0000016363256,0.000089029985,3.6265283e-7,0.00014883165],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926883,0.00017010586,0.00003299741,0.00004943861,0.00017647435,0.00030215213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746203,0.00047796822,0.00057614123,0.00007800609,0.00045892608,0.0009468841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010479355,0.00015955295,0.00028845295,0.0006673285,0.0016078111,0.0012688308,0.00035555454,0.00036233175,0.0018943056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004080496,0.00013219265,0.0002741934,0.0010763279,0.0009141593,0.0002535315,0.00060680456,0.00048835075,0.00021060757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005019483,0.000056158795,0.99778867,0.0000020508894,0.000010777646,0.00001782344,0.0006046989,0.00006168408,0.0000426176,0.00003015206,0.00009202092,0.0012431014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027010803,0.000030229194,0.99837697,0.0000019556012,0.000004099047,0.000010221008,0.0013112412,0.00015416498,0.000014390994,0.0000148885365,0.00007707107,0.000002051367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52975696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62328917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52975696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002616394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029026526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9460248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124299182","doi":"","title":"A Simple Bargaining Mechanism That Elicits Truthful Reservation Prices","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Reservation; Interval (graph theory); Simple (philosophy); Stage (stratigraphy); Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Combinatorics; Finance; Geology; Computer network","score_opus":0.07029652105857437,"score_gpt":0.21242210268190692,"score_spread":0.14212558162333255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124299182","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118406266,0.00038947113,0.8241682,0.0028596064,0.0003990233,0.0010383767,0.0007542006,0.000840819,0.05114406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79768044,0.00024135642,0.18671635,0.0004655573,0.0001479807,0.0006764368,0.00019681793,0.000049363578,0.013825603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99411786,0.0030795594,0.00038688837,0.0008348019,0.0010031916,0.000577684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920832,0.0042621414,0.0011063777,0.0017113473,0.00048312306,0.00035379443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006548354,0.0008337811,0.0011752397,0.00075863535,0.0010907317,0.0027432344,0.002967272,0.004603636,0.0129506765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019143805,0.00082225393,0.0012702722,0.0012311619,0.0018326847,0.0042690956,0.0019027421,0.0017264616,0.0022358033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003365311,0.00025968804,0.0007711429,0.00029863464,0.00010598797,0.00055858423,0.0004171893,0.03835355,0.007297303,0.9228106,0.003782247,0.025008434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006287563,0.00032517675,0.0006037139,0.00005847187,0.00006964059,0.0004790705,0.000085229636,0.19588116,0.0029035227,0.78748506,0.011368207,0.00011200116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046432434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044896844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0129506765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010867884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016673148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04332435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124529826","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/wpvz5","title":"Policing Employment Contracts within the Nexus-of-Contracts Firm","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Business; Labour economics; Industrial organization; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0500473966400168,"score_gpt":0.2467906084816908,"score_spread":0.19674321184167398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124529826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5624599,0.0017647607,0.17946286,0.017806849,0.00024802066,0.0002982759,0.0003427542,0.0003066713,0.23730989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861888,0.00021931484,0.005622044,0.00020451068,0.00005799738,0.000028754683,0.000027617265,0.00001733591,0.0076335794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997086,0.0010879121,0.00012757411,0.0004445781,0.00042951189,0.00082443986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841517,0.009054629,0.0022740078,0.0018709456,0.0010058882,0.0016427934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044135503,0.0002302965,0.0007799682,0.0008148956,0.0039823134,0.0063749175,0.0012704167,0.0037993994,0.011801982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026941473,0.0004631688,0.00039614784,0.0012589631,0.0043201116,0.0052670296,0.0037285662,0.0033651586,0.00073156186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007437395,0.00004273145,0.0055323583,0.000020684125,0.00000919674,0.00015900738,0.0007035523,0.00563055,0.00015818172,0.9681452,0.0034143522,0.016109833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000448776,0.000049977334,0.0033637458,0.00006441823,0.000019483079,0.00009733571,0.0019219054,0.053881753,0.00029922466,0.92559373,0.01464339,0.000020196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01913361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026424717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01913361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031966146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009702761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03948158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124705337","doi":"10.1016/j.joep.2009.08.006","title":"Cognitive coherence and tort reform","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Psychology","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Punitive damages; Tort reform; Tort; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Social psychology; Settlement (finance); Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Cognition; Joint and several liability; Economics; Political science; Law; Liability; Finance","score_opus":0.046926736498249653,"score_gpt":0.29162489248691575,"score_spread":0.2446981559886661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124705337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78679645,0.0015898839,0.011852341,0.034632515,0.0000886006,0.00004488112,0.00009746762,0.000025654957,0.16487221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984865,0.00012133206,0.00040142448,0.00030190032,0.000038692506,0.0000057021284,0.000016037466,0.000003540164,0.00062493386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766135,0.0012022437,0.00010616301,0.00029400986,0.00047159873,0.0002645762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97810924,0.013789288,0.0041028988,0.0013112515,0.0016781081,0.0010092568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038195527,0.00017456198,0.00029770233,0.0012464556,0.0016581811,0.0051509636,0.0005074109,0.002263187,0.0066136634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030466847,0.00022643719,0.00024215964,0.0010648546,0.006388687,0.005438963,0.0018498852,0.0024641836,0.0002415078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013805626,0.0003866345,0.01645328,0.00005914193,0.00006473393,0.00018113386,0.010707082,0.001914765,0.00072113343,0.94435495,0.0027382786,0.02228074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067291665,0.0000468719,0.023713712,0.000024906349,0.000036405792,0.000096191856,0.0035893149,0.0029110766,0.00017928261,0.96432805,0.004986125,0.000020757507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030552694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033235224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066136634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017528371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014917963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022124946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124735424","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3175325","title":"The Signal-Tuning Function of Liability Regimes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; SIGNAL (programming language); Function (biology); Business; Law and economics; Economics; Computer science; Finance; Cell biology; Biology","score_opus":0.01952750520634121,"score_gpt":0.21405353583668052,"score_spread":0.1945260306303393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124735424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7144114,0.0008903435,0.2492732,0.004003164,0.00007226616,0.000050527717,0.00049707585,0.0008947792,0.029907176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994242,0.00017299714,0.002694163,0.000077788005,0.0000438666,0.000010337626,0.00005299559,0.00003771957,0.0026681374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875414,0.00055689295,0.00004683186,0.000294312,0.00016633529,0.00018150877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97041523,0.022642884,0.0030447557,0.0020060884,0.0010608545,0.00083024974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038268566,0.0003953586,0.0009496151,0.0014628829,0.0005858079,0.0026603409,0.0012891889,0.0027939873,0.0073350663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05107801,0.0007276651,0.0004726332,0.0008933575,0.0020514082,0.004136503,0.0011020536,0.0019576997,0.00068768696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032811234,0.00016342325,0.012050265,0.00022118272,0.00012951845,0.0004521932,0.0005998104,0.13636014,0.011121772,0.78467983,0.004516594,0.04937725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049866398,0.000091703296,0.018698217,0.000056446515,0.00004762562,0.000449481,0.0001422245,0.57171685,0.0013683066,0.40634948,0.0009544328,0.00007536225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012963272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007557948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073350663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010413646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052404014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024538219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124772568","doi":"10.1287/msom.2016.0586","title":"Multitasking, Multiarmed Bandits, and the Italian Judiciary","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Human multitasking; FIFO (computing and electronics); Computer science; Scheduling (production processes); Hazard; Function (biology); Monotonic function; Computer security; Economics; Operations research; Law; Operations management; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.016276588473334533,"score_gpt":0.1985197295133991,"score_spread":0.18224314104006456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124772568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7707821,0.0028578371,0.16425867,0.00897048,0.00030468943,0.0002384036,0.00082806667,0.00041206263,0.051347695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98295224,0.0005289785,0.003997879,0.00023766138,0.00014346825,0.00010063043,0.00014814825,0.000023913632,0.011867096],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734217,0.0011860939,0.00008014747,0.00041090502,0.00020555471,0.00077517115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99207616,0.003831716,0.0027271193,0.00042615202,0.00021888549,0.00072003365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052719833,0.0010459198,0.0014647257,0.001349816,0.0014034122,0.003424079,0.0020379566,0.0031028488,0.009563626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013132849,0.0007576596,0.00089606806,0.00132907,0.0028276087,0.001910036,0.0015941656,0.0026741705,0.0014050672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004409177,0.00036511343,0.016600087,0.0000937815,0.00014033847,0.00033590276,0.00045400162,0.7972786,0.00045926042,0.16271445,0.004591185,0.016526423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001583269,0.00025249564,0.007996694,0.00005171867,0.0000675945,0.00008248745,0.00022458841,0.8963961,0.00015233643,0.09137338,0.003188152,0.000056079934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030238776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019675856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030238776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043029105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017658409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06012553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124848905","doi":"","title":"Differential Asset Valuation in the Medieval Post-Talmudic Legal Literature","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Valuation (finance); Talmud; Economics; Financial economics; Actuarial science; Law and economics; Finance; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.010337585954586411,"score_gpt":0.20756426168205758,"score_spread":0.19722667572747116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124848905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63363695,0.021754684,0.003372402,0.013426961,0.00014687928,0.000009256102,0.0000838761,0.000019296029,0.32754967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99561054,0.0012324451,0.00023196831,0.0002607503,0.000110925765,0.000003118874,0.000016111468,0.0000029723742,0.0025312454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999228,0.00035853987,0.000031391224,0.00010968208,0.00013329333,0.0001390964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986217,0.00076091517,0.00021366755,0.00014198878,0.0001541325,0.00010759783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017802541,0.00016969076,0.00019649153,0.0030382655,0.0029146993,0.004397753,0.0007852127,0.0013873706,0.0024331387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004084947,0.00013994426,0.000111847025,0.0026689365,0.014704891,0.003950147,0.0019335975,0.0017120178,0.00015788997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014541555,0.000009437875,0.00096113404,0.00001327593,0.0000025726088,0.00010466955,0.0054013445,0.000116572824,0.000053193795,0.98657656,0.00076139206,0.0059853895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001773987,0.000040497132,0.022493336,0.00030711706,0.000013534513,0.0005036978,0.005497262,0.0017637828,0.00041704127,0.88258994,0.0863276,0.000028502314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003916762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004394176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006245528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006245528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007735622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04531467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124927179","doi":"","title":"Choosing Wisely: The Natural Multi-Bidding Mechanism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Mechanism (biology); Object (grammar); Set (abstract data type); Nash equilibrium; Mechanism design; Computer science; Microeconomics; Aggregate (composite); Operations research; Incentive compatibility; Mathematical economics; Economics; Incentive; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.059833362307772905,"score_gpt":0.29433557132929794,"score_spread":0.23450220902152502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124927179","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04952653,0.00028742565,0.8867856,0.0031621829,0.00018918938,0.0006503909,0.0002652871,0.0002404242,0.05889283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6117821,0.00028457708,0.36716715,0.0011325952,0.00019972665,0.0014925383,0.00015259298,0.0000858356,0.017702963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990746,0.0057866517,0.0004439675,0.001124347,0.0013550611,0.00054403424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99162126,0.0035327189,0.0012929336,0.0020174661,0.00088798144,0.0006476099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008066172,0.0007053054,0.0011294715,0.0008456028,0.0014695353,0.003575079,0.0034380502,0.0031712353,0.007347357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016492406,0.00071213377,0.0011405537,0.0010987389,0.003015649,0.0063959407,0.0021626882,0.0023555097,0.0015216266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007597258,0.00008267203,0.00026996623,0.00006238652,0.000024852065,0.000088812645,0.00015731904,0.0043898295,0.00091130455,0.9818392,0.0016232427,0.010474397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023877315,0.00010272033,0.00017397344,0.000021776264,0.000019498239,0.00042281338,0.000059922175,0.058034264,0.00059747085,0.9291434,0.0111456625,0.00003975259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050118647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005771335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008066172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011741119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017883647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042658508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125024542","doi":"","title":"Determining Poultry Indemnity Values: Examples and Lessons Learned from Poultry Disease Outbreaks in Canada and the United States","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indemnity; Government (linguistics); Outbreak; Value (mathematics); Business; Influenza A virus subtype H5N1; Legislation; Economics; Actuarial science; Law; Political science; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.07801541846323931,"score_gpt":0.2893669240354483,"score_spread":0.21135150557220897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125024542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87237054,0.016631173,0.013936332,0.02186475,0.00014274266,0.000143747,0.0014164676,0.0000896049,0.07340454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98148555,0.007693173,0.006510781,0.0005963303,0.000035085162,0.0000143320785,0.0005473774,0.000036398556,0.0030808984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716175,0.00087840937,0.000120209996,0.00017124794,0.0011796207,0.00048882916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774278,0.01089281,0.00086440536,0.0006408865,0.009691085,0.00048294762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049327444,0.00046002143,0.0006164587,0.0029134718,0.0037770872,0.0032450825,0.0013929987,0.0014085486,0.0009060411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022269027,0.00024242554,0.00036053814,0.0051747123,0.0038396262,0.0019918394,0.001301682,0.002059543,0.00010420975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042719522,0.00039841785,0.5733895,0.0006980997,0.00026467958,0.0064779967,0.054902963,0.02153239,0.0013860523,0.07371012,0.036256365,0.23055612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014526752,0.00014654572,0.590024,0.0012420205,0.00023483779,0.0016551787,0.14186211,0.050771866,0.0076711457,0.079044014,0.12684831,0.0003547775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9362949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95726794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06370509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021956101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0106507465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15930343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125071721","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2663612","title":"Social Norms and Legal Design","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Enforcement; Liability; Norm (philosophy); Law and economics; Business; Strict liability; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.039394155417475506,"score_gpt":0.2253445210583789,"score_spread":0.1859503656409034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125071721","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18217696,0.0054191924,0.19222154,0.07291404,0.00048745688,0.00020184256,0.0002624094,0.00016808075,0.54614854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98327255,0.00053624134,0.007981322,0.0007955901,0.00013511682,0.00009723416,0.000038502087,0.000027543372,0.0071158223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99055636,0.0066214222,0.00030247026,0.0009865969,0.0010506363,0.00048260455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784466,0.015322054,0.0016396861,0.001956359,0.0018018254,0.00083341304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009509717,0.00038227788,0.0005991474,0.0018771661,0.002712843,0.0084849065,0.0010879356,0.0032254248,0.007081922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021275047,0.0003525196,0.000447444,0.0011321072,0.021725463,0.0046774074,0.0019106588,0.0023187262,0.00051395944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004451289,0.0000124723465,0.0004650914,0.000011416314,0.000008685762,0.000010109704,0.00051678054,0.0004238665,0.000029027215,0.9954997,0.00049848534,0.0025199098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008136797,0.000004558631,0.0002585732,0.000013222135,0.0000035508106,0.000009594305,0.00022803214,0.00074944115,0.000034105844,0.9952217,0.0034657873,0.0000033855006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035634604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037352305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009509717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037450418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033052613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05029279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125072755","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.881110","title":"Mismatch in Law School","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Graduation (instrument); Criticism; Selection (genetic algorithm); Political science; Selection bias; Elite; Implicit bias; Confounding; Racial bias; Equal opportunity; Law; Demographic economics; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Law and economics; Racism; Economics; Computer science; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.015539346050375893,"score_gpt":0.21210967599454364,"score_spread":0.19657032994416773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125072755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7880913,0.001775934,0.0035199735,0.03803439,0.000173058,0.00007823401,0.0006651416,0.00011620405,0.16754572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930998,0.00007880685,0.00008782413,0.0008416251,0.00004684521,0.000010860466,0.00006573936,0.000016053224,0.0057523935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99523973,0.0015963259,0.00022692682,0.0008582783,0.000888213,0.0011903901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796571,0.008740715,0.0034641959,0.001637068,0.0027888846,0.0037120376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004109207,0.00011915531,0.0009177458,0.0024401275,0.0037169557,0.0049732905,0.0011144314,0.0033458872,0.06357285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053597745,0.00031997717,0.00021679216,0.004004865,0.0028302304,0.009328031,0.00406426,0.0029442683,0.0029816183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037973642,0.0005657381,0.13372144,0.000085660206,0.00003674364,0.00037468705,0.012489796,0.0010158462,0.00029770087,0.77697486,0.02349253,0.050565362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013506973,0.0001517253,0.15687123,0.00014188392,0.00004818875,0.00044718647,0.02648141,0.0066469098,0.00058667467,0.74428666,0.06414603,0.00005702443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01131609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013078446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06357285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043332465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032867691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21267241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125083133","doi":"","title":"Executive Compensation, Earnings Management and Shareholder Litigation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Shareholder; Executive compensation; Affect (linguistics); Dismissal; Class action; Earnings; Earnings management; Business; Compensation (psychology); Accounting; Litigation risk analysis; Actuarial science; Economics; Finance; Law; Psychology; Political science; Corporate governance; Social psychology","score_opus":0.012409769584135923,"score_gpt":0.19833030613173955,"score_spread":0.18592053654760363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125083133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98913074,0.0017357812,0.0004971539,0.0009441482,0.000013404132,0.000017752984,0.00008520856,0.000009004122,0.0075667114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872005,0.00023684095,0.000055494595,0.000044784218,0.000030097024,0.0000044557046,0.000045382698,0.0000011501498,0.00086178083],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976834,0.00086096843,0.00015960305,0.00018338411,0.0005518472,0.00056074717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9250028,0.039529204,0.030568786,0.000877331,0.00094121543,0.003080622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002635059,0.00034880938,0.00051309034,0.0011040305,0.00066026335,0.0025537359,0.0006586821,0.0015442836,0.007017183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021978645,0.00017128876,0.00041447967,0.0012636996,0.0014863124,0.0018666773,0.0011214874,0.001479013,0.00060779316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048440558,0.0009510008,0.957928,0.000066560075,0.00020936999,0.00076415756,0.00032178356,0.007736435,0.0004308298,0.010896793,0.0007110244,0.019499753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037760583,0.000526994,0.97879285,0.000048211667,0.00008924672,0.0003549592,0.00058198726,0.005616565,0.00025592512,0.012306585,0.0013549004,0.000034043613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035331806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043005375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007017183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013519073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000981063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023474872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125164874","doi":"10.7892/boris.145768","title":"Why Plaintiffs' Attorneys Use Contingent and Defense Attorneys Fixed Fee Contracts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Damages; American rule; Business; Incentive; Contingency; Law; Actuarial science; Contributory negligence; Law and economics; Economics; Liability; Political science; Finance; Tort; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.036308696340388615,"score_gpt":0.19409464362877668,"score_spread":0.15778594728838807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125164874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81161386,0.0038457664,0.02547644,0.04572903,0.0002581397,0.00014656367,0.00056538073,0.00021036646,0.11215446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99327964,0.0003292172,0.0010628685,0.00085898355,0.000044318487,0.000017516295,0.00006350359,0.000025343108,0.004318588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98961836,0.003215177,0.0007889288,0.0012504584,0.0020836215,0.0030435096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97428644,0.0134100625,0.004735914,0.002948896,0.0024885547,0.0021302756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0088518765,0.00015541613,0.0006657632,0.0013194091,0.002258074,0.006657266,0.001059143,0.0033543601,0.014484596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041260686,0.0005952496,0.00044764133,0.0017257697,0.0026896808,0.00489846,0.0018948528,0.002245375,0.0017276123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020920756,0.0004677894,0.17986932,0.000109333196,0.00010086684,0.00082036515,0.0035906802,0.0032913317,0.0009603524,0.7195717,0.030457292,0.06055169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040574293,0.00017736772,0.21118058,0.00037648642,0.00017299087,0.0024399767,0.01287714,0.027129358,0.0028183942,0.63986075,0.102351956,0.00020938167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015167857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013781159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015167857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030652347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030768365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048455775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125187840","doi":"","title":"THE EVOLUTION OF SMALL CLAIMS COURT: RISING MONETARY LIMITS AND USE OF LEGAL REPRESENTATION","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.32761824056541294,"score_gpt":0.4417154339381243,"score_spread":0.11409719337271135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125187840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936511,0.00013513173,0.00007554699,0.00044229193,0.0000037537131,0.000008649919,0.00010969581,0.000002324558,0.005571517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998004,0.000075357995,0.000044229088,0.000028332566,0.000003527197,0.0000036238614,0.000053607204,0.0000015818107,0.0017857024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825674,0.00027263566,0.000091541326,0.00024269865,0.0007645644,0.00037179663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922907,0.0015013457,0.003023736,0.00036558256,0.0016175966,0.0012011062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012525474,0.00008354207,0.00017842861,0.0013011819,0.002363033,0.0029723493,0.0008580728,0.0006373562,0.004085719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009914372,0.00018063997,0.00013407963,0.0014952254,0.0028431502,0.0011645699,0.0015898879,0.00074937294,0.000284272],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002927092,0.00012052558,0.865795,0.00007506333,0.000068490524,0.0013625886,0.08777195,0.0008018572,0.004163735,0.0061312923,0.0018220439,0.03159467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016517417,0.000030732153,0.9824954,0.00001614616,0.0000041412545,0.000060451835,0.014302736,0.00013326555,0.00018851543,0.00013627345,0.0026186684,0.000012007565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6756244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8563523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6756244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013582963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052995617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65257186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125206264","doi":"10.1017/s1355770x06003214","title":"On the redistributive impact of privatizing a resource under imperfect enforcement","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Development Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Imperfect; Enforcement; Economics; Resource (disambiguation); Order (exchange); Common-pool resource; Politics; Microeconomics; Public economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01878700596159979,"score_gpt":0.18424176386983077,"score_spread":0.16545475790823097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125206264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80291885,0.0017759005,0.023732038,0.012677876,0.00018712445,0.00016693807,0.00044752855,0.0000668122,0.15802698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945531,0.0005456463,0.00065248634,0.0003669576,0.00012293756,0.000024456527,0.00002051507,0.000007742553,0.0037061546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976509,0.001137912,0.00005054112,0.00014496669,0.00019788952,0.0008177627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98249346,0.01305098,0.0025156806,0.0005699134,0.0007707851,0.00059912045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038890643,0.0005148918,0.00097646844,0.0011834917,0.0015464629,0.0026182923,0.0009784484,0.0019126385,0.015502782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014861653,0.0002480938,0.00058936805,0.0011639993,0.0045675095,0.0020361673,0.0020822117,0.0018078983,0.00037242513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011117024,0.00078645395,0.020524101,0.00027450148,0.00025264616,0.001597868,0.00058623677,0.3082603,0.002784468,0.6253772,0.00623119,0.032213435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005181376,0.00088763895,0.029580161,0.0001840809,0.000426836,0.0003473347,0.0026308657,0.27429378,0.001607778,0.6814218,0.007974799,0.00012675657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015973581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012573612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015973581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036285715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018250496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05186194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125285671","doi":"","title":"Pre-Trial Settlement and the Value of Audits","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Liability; Settlement (finance); Business; Accounting; Value (mathematics); Actuarial science; Welfare; Economics; Finance; Computer science; Payment","score_opus":0.00937448155154074,"score_gpt":0.20361244986705887,"score_spread":0.19423796831551812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125285671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80209833,0.003742339,0.06510928,0.0073027243,0.00026934844,0.00033461515,0.00024999597,0.00016870657,0.12072468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935621,0.00028289048,0.0014323182,0.00010130818,0.00005876608,0.000034042932,0.000036421487,0.0000138492005,0.004478326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799294,0.008869685,0.0012598791,0.0013064683,0.004741426,0.0038931707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83246547,0.1207878,0.021930126,0.010350648,0.008494835,0.005971169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018526988,0.0005401212,0.0014511158,0.0016766407,0.0015682395,0.0063086045,0.0018355105,0.0034529183,0.009608517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11976685,0.00061140646,0.00078324694,0.0009844177,0.0038332136,0.0057095387,0.0028262294,0.0034938762,0.000728755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027356881,0.0013224743,0.04730192,0.00036212354,0.00037641768,0.001333423,0.0018534899,0.12939137,0.003227455,0.6289513,0.0037449792,0.17939937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003448797,0.0020121683,0.06320277,0.0005304014,0.00025625716,0.0010133862,0.0023514705,0.12104529,0.004232901,0.7905402,0.014275098,0.00019518679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015470005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002046463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018526988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004085382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004725538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097981215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125394594","doi":"","title":"Justice as a Rounding Error? Evidence of Subconscious Bias in Second-Degree Murder Sentences in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subconscious; Heuristics; Preference; Discretion; Rounding; Psychology; Degree (music); Judicial discretion; Consistency (knowledge bases); Heuristic; Criminal law; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Criminology; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Judicial review","score_opus":0.1434238247508184,"score_gpt":0.2697933154148424,"score_spread":0.126369490664024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125394594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891739,0.00027215734,0.00015637878,0.001875963,0.000021817783,0.000047040467,0.00040522407,0.000006725604,0.008040803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980855,0.00018472681,0.00010049354,0.00033479257,0.000008449022,0.000007892654,0.00013905946,0.000007299429,0.0011318101],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947008,0.0006161943,0.000299436,0.00065104564,0.002319632,0.0014130207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96643615,0.0076740026,0.009640197,0.0019981381,0.011564023,0.0026874966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036077711,0.00019309696,0.000569758,0.001995026,0.008766736,0.003154846,0.0021820932,0.0013598313,0.0045403778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042836007,0.0005520391,0.00032338346,0.0035303044,0.0036304006,0.0010263749,0.0020446428,0.0021402235,0.0003244838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033832865,0.00019275714,0.91898066,0.000084498,0.0000753181,0.00058942684,0.04400925,0.00032560853,0.0007049392,0.004284205,0.0057098004,0.024705118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024301884,0.000039013743,0.9757564,0.00007875425,0.00003137109,0.0001619981,0.01707324,0.0006288991,0.00030127092,0.00053370366,0.0053151855,0.000055806213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029960116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029960116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040492896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21737689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125429127","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2171.2008.00002.x","title":"Rules of proof, courts, and incentives","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Imperfect; Civil litigation; Tort; Tort reform; Law and economics; Burden of proof; Civil procedure; Arbitration; Business; Standard of care; Economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Liability","score_opus":0.0349545227360615,"score_gpt":0.19876698831410614,"score_spread":0.16381246557804463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125429127","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041336555,0.008096074,0.7204212,0.027821844,0.0006850363,0.0005364793,0.00031354843,0.00019788797,0.20059142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77767473,0.005107199,0.19001098,0.0022759787,0.0011864037,0.000868958,0.00020946535,0.00013316509,0.022533214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9653937,0.019014604,0.0028168226,0.0029355406,0.0074823843,0.0023569888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87951165,0.088857256,0.011967129,0.008187706,0.009048585,0.0024276876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031888254,0.0009318082,0.0013388839,0.0031967422,0.0032693788,0.0114969425,0.002733975,0.0070750886,0.0069495286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09907414,0.0011559349,0.00084703456,0.0028162892,0.013581307,0.010996819,0.003481561,0.0047383294,0.0012489205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000500807,0.000010902242,0.00013879151,0.000020426018,0.000004714195,0.000018652312,0.00006201921,0.0020633296,0.000037594895,0.9935306,0.00059370446,0.003514347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017084663,0.000008417754,0.000053960655,0.0000332286,0.0000037496895,0.000022852802,0.000028932678,0.004184959,0.00006404198,0.9918281,0.0037465838,0.000008099893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002645427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002090022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031888254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053734523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071985577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16864324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125497140","doi":"","title":"Amakudari: The Post-Retirement Employment of Elite Bureaucrats in Japan","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Collusion; Elite; Government (linguistics); Business; Labour economics; Economics; Industrial organization; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05120016698306538,"score_gpt":0.2973582103103639,"score_spread":0.24615804332729854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125497140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929658,0.00043683048,0.00018232176,0.00088047504,0.000019139174,0.0000069754174,0.000036204747,0.0000027087297,0.005469601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967926,0.00026460388,0.00006970316,0.00015212566,0.000024730645,0.000006637799,0.000035273213,0.0000020121918,0.002652351],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990225,0.00010628129,0.000041026975,0.00008535504,0.00013980221,0.000605109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983171,0.00014964747,0.00077379926,0.000054918924,0.00016132367,0.0005432087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011767128,0.00013265874,0.00029014284,0.0011457234,0.004003492,0.0024007417,0.00044506587,0.0009143997,0.0028877214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017607188,0.00015246695,0.00019831842,0.0017381096,0.0016346237,0.0010723363,0.0023844957,0.0010580558,0.0003405868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041163762,0.00043138966,0.8251352,0.00014496811,0.000039602757,0.004923424,0.071986385,0.0006498442,0.0022183887,0.035866205,0.006809527,0.05138358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042608244,0.00018576949,0.90059847,0.00011085474,0.000045151417,0.00046724227,0.07129305,0.001773385,0.00037272877,0.0042757434,0.020792155,0.000042859043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051078565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07155818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051078565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028827267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023979635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1015625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125530432","doi":"10.1111/ecoj.2016.126.issue-593","title":"Regulation via the Polluter-Pays Principle","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Toulouse 1 Capitole Publications (Université Toulouse I Capitole)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Polluter pays principle; Damages; Economics; Welfare; Pollution; Natural resource economics; Law; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.021565021264862864,"score_gpt":0.20771926784649794,"score_spread":0.18615424658163507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125530432","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20773825,0.0030398578,0.5272195,0.020846583,0.00035114103,0.00016414198,0.00021553146,0.00016252219,0.2402625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757151,0.0008066216,0.011205419,0.0009606474,0.00022174757,0.00011569808,0.00002987956,0.00002392155,0.010921144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965063,0.0016274056,0.00009387556,0.00057807623,0.00076581194,0.00042847038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974004,0.0015602201,0.00039469806,0.00029144317,0.00024342605,0.00010985955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044960035,0.00037778067,0.0008308764,0.0006831501,0.0012684568,0.0024379895,0.00088587333,0.0032148075,0.0044285227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059234635,0.00027107654,0.000988158,0.00056669663,0.0046092,0.0026923607,0.0020037692,0.0021404028,0.00036231277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007214525,0.0000110378805,0.00016599613,0.00002107381,0.00001432469,0.000050803214,0.00004746317,0.007241281,0.00019952674,0.98935634,0.00046732317,0.0024174624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027217895,0.000020061065,0.00020793758,0.00001599293,0.000013589396,0.00006646389,0.00003816689,0.0120054,0.00027916903,0.9837399,0.0035769863,0.00000902457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012613889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009039535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044960035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017489842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015035865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023777425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125656850","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.373","title":"ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND BEYOND","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Adjudication; Economic Justice; Scholarship; Tribunal; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Law; Work (physics); Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.018811540854771994,"score_gpt":0.2066464900329916,"score_spread":0.1878349491782196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125656850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011790264,0.017716315,0.0057473714,0.076740324,0.00069571816,0.000019857553,0.000073482515,0.000036328365,0.8871804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8593934,0.009316233,0.001303842,0.0243872,0.0024061617,0.0000764538,0.0000675948,0.00007960726,0.10296947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943481,0.0019364941,0.00014562081,0.00082183117,0.0014711333,0.0012769183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957898,0.0018795104,0.00025901909,0.00052641385,0.00062904967,0.0009161706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004116262,0.00028639226,0.0005565295,0.001648308,0.009134684,0.0110593345,0.0012259224,0.005563848,0.016987205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008325009,0.00020897413,0.00040967096,0.0012717745,0.030516664,0.010273638,0.010778338,0.0055929953,0.0014009131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031670515,0.000005094599,0.00007278032,0.000008823581,0.0000013977732,0.000023990562,0.0013751995,0.000026541053,0.00001997483,0.9909402,0.0033305155,0.004192392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005313094,0.000014989079,0.00047905283,0.00025130884,0.0000035904625,0.00008817412,0.0014521106,0.00008097195,0.000053692696,0.7239297,0.27363047,0.000010575835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015419122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011596471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016987205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00802817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071967617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0582487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125683266","doi":"","title":"Can Strikes Pay for Management? Pro Sports’ Major Turnarounds","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Battle; Sanctions; Business; Salary; Incentive; Agency (philosophy); Work (physics); Collective bargaining; Revenue; Forcing (mathematics); Investment (military); Revenue sharing; Law and economics; Market economy; Economics; Finance; Political science; Law; Engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.013773281344512408,"score_gpt":0.21511473306852674,"score_spread":0.20134145172401433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125683266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14493339,0.001918846,0.011019755,0.2692876,0.0037347483,0.00007667069,0.00007480817,0.00022758084,0.56872654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9349046,0.00038035284,0.0014253613,0.015398791,0.0006412107,0.000035727622,0.00002498025,0.000053862226,0.04713524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99515235,0.001375964,0.000110383604,0.00062366383,0.0008943243,0.0018432919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99527466,0.0012211237,0.0006039049,0.00049492856,0.00076249783,0.0016427725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005256539,0.0003566011,0.00025482388,0.00072874664,0.0070850984,0.01309099,0.0011706845,0.0048814826,0.016453423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012695162,0.00028213896,0.00040382516,0.00060774595,0.007394578,0.006439048,0.0032853445,0.0070290603,0.0015564612],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008421292,0.00011012972,0.003099971,0.00003419308,0.00001182636,0.00023255838,0.0062411777,0.00039421464,0.00042066287,0.89731795,0.05470771,0.037345435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000432162,0.00017526766,0.008638424,0.00018082521,0.000016407434,0.00036444413,0.022845386,0.0022488753,0.0011542585,0.46353635,0.5007401,0.000056487785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029398787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048180176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016453423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052426923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041902964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055042148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125688331","doi":"10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00002.x","title":"Rules of proof, courts, and incentives","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Incentive; Imperfect; Civil litigation; Tort; Law and economics; Civil procedure; Tort reform; Arbitration; Standard of care; Business; Economics; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Liability; Medicine","score_opus":0.0349545227360615,"score_gpt":0.19876698831410614,"score_spread":0.16381246557804463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125688331","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038173143,0.0074718315,0.7422671,0.026068643,0.00064889685,0.00053947256,0.00030702067,0.0001956094,0.18432832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7565812,0.005030349,0.21197699,0.002275174,0.001213506,0.0008996759,0.00022008579,0.0001370846,0.021665974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96379584,0.019856691,0.0030510516,0.0030995866,0.007818111,0.0023787168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8767794,0.09090837,0.012192439,0.008459208,0.009194555,0.0024660958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03304093,0.0009551015,0.0013888982,0.0033290982,0.0033736022,0.011739029,0.002849781,0.007178462,0.0069172457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10299625,0.0011751031,0.0008703127,0.0029971104,0.013731875,0.011210977,0.0035915459,0.004775703,0.0012992023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005281743,0.000011340042,0.00014943177,0.000021885035,0.00000502048,0.000020663249,0.00006607404,0.0021908216,0.00003932141,0.9930949,0.0006079046,0.0037873397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001733608,0.000008826405,0.000053659645,0.000034421162,0.000003965259,0.00002461955,0.000028890037,0.004246561,0.0000651933,0.99180675,0.0037014072,0.000008338458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002635662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021308307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03304093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053267353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007213086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17473918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125726066","doi":"10.1093/jleo/ewp031","title":"The economics of scientific misconduct","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Library science; Schools of economic thought; Political science; Sociology; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05566970825645885,"score_gpt":0.20068255269983187,"score_spread":0.14501284444337303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125726066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037475318,0.022639202,0.014302584,0.27555513,0.0026811592,0.00011698827,0.00069966924,0.00012588686,0.64640415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89930534,0.017388824,0.0023891702,0.017705997,0.00476386,0.00019715862,0.00022141657,0.00013164192,0.057896525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97423846,0.011988741,0.00091371743,0.001606556,0.009660724,0.0015919042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8393394,0.10267055,0.014583324,0.011238399,0.02637749,0.0057908804],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021230962,0.0003415566,0.00079829164,0.0057177143,0.0040550907,0.012152492,0.0015349486,0.0073828413,0.025870994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14251775,0.00039182304,0.0005287381,0.005303942,0.012350605,0.010520515,0.003877234,0.003956452,0.0033791682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049898175,0.000041811338,0.0031628062,0.00012457039,0.000051810584,0.00020199668,0.00057429133,0.001382469,0.00007053608,0.9080053,0.05423467,0.03209979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030201867,0.000037907976,0.003022204,0.00042898193,0.000032212207,0.00032695036,0.00082406175,0.0018619754,0.00014192457,0.87577075,0.11748299,0.000039725135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032013236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022613194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99261713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007854261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073456704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11228144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125834797","doi":"","title":"Canadian Contractural Duress and Criminal Duress: \"Irrational, Anomalous, Perverse, Illogical and Fundamentally Wrong\" or Just Misunderstood?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Commonwealth; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology; Criminal law; Criminology; History","score_opus":0.06770941803066498,"score_gpt":0.25105075158018647,"score_spread":0.18334133354952148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125834797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0957777,0.049284615,0.0052413587,0.23467146,0.0016170084,0.00006229921,0.0008159247,0.00007327002,0.61245626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.952051,0.01671326,0.0010011486,0.008450713,0.00055861776,0.00002740544,0.00020383045,0.000043599204,0.02095043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970764,0.00056745816,0.00009548017,0.00032171406,0.0012960428,0.00064289785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924907,0.0020553106,0.00093454315,0.000505999,0.002677861,0.0013355924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028690977,0.00046555066,0.00053398055,0.0030312252,0.011505079,0.0083637675,0.0015283842,0.0029635981,0.006567319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023331573,0.0003296762,0.00028801546,0.0059994822,0.03022787,0.0055760792,0.003277095,0.005131518,0.00027119677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000210154,0.000009374105,0.0054149157,0.000054788674,0.000011042003,0.00010217898,0.011910226,0.000267645,0.000032232787,0.9416762,0.022633042,0.017867325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038062728,0.000026649752,0.061934672,0.0009785027,0.00006492416,0.00043639823,0.026550932,0.0016503042,0.00015375603,0.5971645,0.31078166,0.00021971227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9612715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.967622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070695564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070695564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.087867595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5129346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125904894","doi":"","title":"When Is It Efficient to Treat Juvenile Offenders More Leniently than Adult Offenders","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Juvenile; Commit; Juvenile delinquency; Economic Justice; Criminology; Incentive; Recidivism; Psychology; Economics; Political science; Law; Biology; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.018556258010828892,"score_gpt":0.2136405667020655,"score_spread":0.1950843086912366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125904894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8865354,0.003470279,0.0101383235,0.06146157,0.00051932625,0.00027221558,0.0005603791,0.00007701999,0.03696542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877336,0.00092735136,0.003705518,0.0035598476,0.00038924112,0.00010870063,0.00013966812,0.000026245665,0.0034098893],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994989,0.0020705264,0.00034982277,0.00053942023,0.0005994562,0.0014517615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805115,0.005665566,0.0071718777,0.00087788084,0.001574793,0.0041983845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00681569,0.00021897972,0.0007036508,0.0009626201,0.0009138393,0.0028145486,0.0007571107,0.001732007,0.0059629367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027350696,0.00027104453,0.00039679796,0.00081465655,0.0020498633,0.003482961,0.0011427493,0.0014651589,0.0010930108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021099756,0.0032012707,0.47239745,0.001061851,0.00096622534,0.0012066783,0.0029607224,0.014477623,0.011155781,0.08299333,0.032045323,0.3754238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012317197,0.0029051404,0.75189376,0.0015585661,0.00046762114,0.0024735704,0.014221847,0.016588168,0.008392308,0.14592369,0.054149844,0.00019382485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029968938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004288544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00681569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001654128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028696829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036045253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125924187","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1916029","title":"Adversarial Versus Inquisitorial Testimony","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.037147027373510506,"score_gpt":0.2157235638708954,"score_spread":0.1785765364973849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125924187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16829349,0.008527356,0.0985882,0.094110884,0.0023672588,0.00032646136,0.0006271122,0.00017456229,0.62698466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97590035,0.0015473723,0.0039112717,0.0042919754,0.0009124501,0.000056173558,0.0000513823,0.000027159274,0.013301892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97996473,0.011840554,0.0011487367,0.0016539773,0.0038573628,0.0015346733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8683409,0.10832707,0.007894338,0.009092062,0.004740342,0.0016053402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025711617,0.000449381,0.00065055606,0.0015940965,0.0019201236,0.0058196206,0.0020504664,0.0068594855,0.020550335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1630833,0.0004161643,0.00048097462,0.00087432226,0.004818763,0.00555708,0.003451173,0.004371,0.0026620443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028046334,0.00009235848,0.0022332515,0.00020041746,0.0000717651,0.00042049945,0.0011437857,0.0018266848,0.00038061905,0.9527664,0.012160177,0.028423702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010343289,0.00014635005,0.0032097863,0.00033452528,0.0001284582,0.001057905,0.0009159566,0.007946972,0.0010598459,0.95875895,0.026293125,0.000044705084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007032768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009951546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025711617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015305862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016539374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13597763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126005484","doi":"10.29173/alr1287","title":"Empirical Study of Civil Justice Systems: A Look at the Literature","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"University of Toronto; York University; American Bar Foundation; Harvard University; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Empirical research; Economic Justice; Empirical legal studies; Law; Product liability; Legal profession; Political science; Civil procedure; Legal liability; Product (mathematics); Malpractice; Civil law (Civil law); Sociology; Liability; Commercial law","score_opus":0.03707974248569461,"score_gpt":0.2671866673805742,"score_spread":0.2301069248948796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126005484","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014876508,0.8531983,0.003437431,0.08685073,0.00050824933,0.000032341464,0.00016072181,0.000019229014,0.040916413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3468238,0.631643,0.0029156655,0.012430173,0.0028055208,0.000063668675,0.00030508928,0.000025340361,0.0029876675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99161035,0.00498537,0.00039882964,0.0005701253,0.0020124796,0.00042275764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92745644,0.06385243,0.0026021004,0.0011033233,0.0043602195,0.00062557374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009339195,0.00038049597,0.0008033576,0.01656668,0.002396936,0.0068958197,0.0016496873,0.003228078,0.00399239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034086537,0.000565646,0.00050237816,0.01901623,0.011818677,0.0065086093,0.0018641639,0.003488891,0.0005263702],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029045832,0.0002711412,0.017956866,0.003964868,0.00011381876,0.00037806612,0.0057256753,0.002118899,0.00018024043,0.8107047,0.026256999,0.13229963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004039932,0.00017496545,0.1120609,0.025837725,0.00008886177,0.0006749492,0.03073365,0.0035268215,0.00033610876,0.41640183,0.40999565,0.00012809451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026322808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022570547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026322808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008346444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007413793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06055796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126098553","doi":"","title":"The Extent and Intensity of Insider Trading Enforcement - An International Comparison","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Insider trading; Enforcement; Statutory law; Business; Empirical research; Scope (computer science); Insider; Accounting; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.04027642084958428,"score_gpt":0.2621856036262124,"score_spread":0.22190918277662813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126098553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744052,0.001156003,0.00053451245,0.00019111086,0.000016688047,0.000022875165,0.0018635985,0.000019787009,0.021790097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99628675,0.0005157546,0.00021389354,0.000035429024,0.000019610676,0.000006961608,0.0019206206,0.000011679276,0.000989329],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967398,0.0006651477,0.00042918182,0.0006131814,0.0010359496,0.0005166731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722457,0.0050747874,0.016771171,0.0015821949,0.003328941,0.0009972156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022739724,0.00018961215,0.00050290755,0.005035994,0.00064986106,0.002185258,0.00045967952,0.00040182064,0.0024323645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010505287,0.00014717192,0.00038507025,0.0063375463,0.0013748705,0.0017761801,0.0014172737,0.0007026106,0.00030709183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017314735,0.000085656466,0.954893,0.00015012488,0.00025392754,0.00039391115,0.0034347025,0.0015636282,0.0008492891,0.005669884,0.001954124,0.030578615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031516324,0.000042663243,0.9929972,0.000044964094,0.000031690364,0.00022675736,0.0020406167,0.0003091382,0.00032427823,0.00020416795,0.003760716,0.000014491122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017947324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032629937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017947324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010876672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006601542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035685718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126112262","doi":"","title":"Beyond Mistakes: The Next Wave of Behavioural Law and Economics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queen's law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Law; Psychology; Law and economics; Positive economics; Political science","score_opus":0.04753016435722381,"score_gpt":0.20728524413736402,"score_spread":0.1597550797801402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126112262","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049883425,0.027189735,0.07003134,0.69993526,0.0023066865,0.00004128999,0.00039703143,0.00018546655,0.15002978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92159426,0.01144042,0.011498896,0.03465423,0.0036763998,0.000071008835,0.000118924225,0.00016358866,0.016782124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949255,0.0028084149,0.00012986845,0.00050805736,0.001101732,0.0005264703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96326584,0.025376668,0.0017656217,0.0039013505,0.0033496348,0.0023409277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009240793,0.0004018314,0.0010025105,0.0018053107,0.0022337886,0.011728578,0.0017061806,0.0071791895,0.012370815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03690031,0.00040645065,0.00052595744,0.0021590895,0.033487417,0.026101261,0.004442224,0.010589711,0.0009860379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001909855,0.000021851723,0.001127311,0.000040664654,0.000009222887,0.000029339246,0.001322496,0.00030964505,0.00006162712,0.9742134,0.00745827,0.015387035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000521167,0.0000060114007,0.0006671377,0.00005339036,0.0000024352014,0.000016369067,0.0005655791,0.0006545802,0.000017914512,0.9841912,0.013811278,0.000008925044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010799095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008837447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012370815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004619748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004640355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048870564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126114932","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-4085.2004.00239.x","title":"Modelling the choice between regulation and liability in terms of social welfare","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Profitability index; Liability; Damages; Welfare; Microeconomics; Economics; Social Welfare; Private information retrieval; Space (punctuation); Information asymmetry; Public economics; Actuarial science; Business; Finance; Market economy; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.11910935840181651,"score_gpt":0.18389280643729086,"score_spread":0.06478344803547435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126114932","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3597844,0.0009515096,0.40250996,0.018615942,0.00015502925,0.0002916289,0.00083788566,0.00016665235,0.21668693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872,0.00026210968,0.0050728787,0.00023968822,0.000052845888,0.00010111003,0.000041795807,0.00002027979,0.007009337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99658966,0.002103233,0.0000612395,0.00030572017,0.00028555287,0.00065461546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99167985,0.006106279,0.000967343,0.0003012731,0.0004198211,0.00052541564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00398624,0.0007501349,0.0010262688,0.0012504589,0.0011728029,0.005420017,0.0014243576,0.004556146,0.011386052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013689195,0.00065375573,0.00084548467,0.0011359552,0.0046705655,0.0050901575,0.002015654,0.0030082532,0.000661804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056520643,0.00006603977,0.00069510913,0.0000377854,0.000023592474,0.00011739811,0.0001021411,0.16500318,0.00038424548,0.83018136,0.00092968164,0.002402996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008540397,0.00006926502,0.0007575915,0.000047706002,0.00003092832,0.000054835433,0.00018617102,0.3010208,0.00016238466,0.69541305,0.0021478964,0.00002391093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004473728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003951289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011386052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006916777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021134869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050184965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126941847","doi":"10.7202/1074603ar","title":"Le préjudice boursier","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.017568824380186764,"score_gpt":0.20237360265652676,"score_spread":0.18480477827634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126941847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025720654,0.007507659,0.006354342,0.03218733,0.0006201798,0.000042408683,0.00013762747,0.0000736912,0.92735606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76709926,0.0030567793,0.0013419049,0.009861501,0.00028365242,0.00006619401,0.000082081075,0.00006459609,0.21814404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960353,0.0014951059,0.00013837047,0.0005802543,0.0010149534,0.0007361394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979133,0.00060830085,0.00026076505,0.00040253942,0.0005473664,0.0002677383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023899327,0.00048905023,0.00033319744,0.0011464625,0.006591071,0.008874932,0.0008081618,0.0051930915,0.013195636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004047904,0.00031447454,0.000412507,0.0011269877,0.020472968,0.00425287,0.0039044619,0.004485241,0.0024793244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000620329,0.000004911897,0.00034960356,0.0000139567765,0.0000025314368,0.000059352828,0.0019139404,0.00005653848,0.000083080355,0.987645,0.005689151,0.0041757645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001685607,0.000028880784,0.002613628,0.00030645035,0.00001042684,0.00032483385,0.0038555095,0.00025965515,0.00031401994,0.27356207,0.7186711,0.00003655639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06309189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062612645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06309189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009306702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007573624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1254493},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3126952376","doi":"10.3138/cjcrim.43.1.1","title":"La couverture journalistique des requêtes de révision judiciaire au Canada","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; International Centre for Comparative Criminology","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine","score_opus":0.04322450483189885,"score_gpt":0.22624677673844373,"score_spread":0.18302227190654488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126952376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8514622,0.02206369,0.0043219496,0.019436294,0.0004445661,0.00012314583,0.005749455,0.0004887589,0.09590989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627946,0.006095852,0.0021670656,0.00054935145,0.00037610577,0.000043789743,0.0009888685,0.000076856544,0.026907498],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853313,0.0025526874,0.00053438166,0.00081444357,0.0095278965,0.0012392984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9421055,0.02636614,0.006551195,0.0013762455,0.020251745,0.0033490832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051769246,0.0005922305,0.0007289616,0.006992387,0.003299172,0.006920417,0.0009405377,0.0013188984,0.008784796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053290322,0.0005284361,0.00047919675,0.007081309,0.001982932,0.0012456926,0.00068737054,0.0025784087,0.0008656849],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014899941,0.00046855,0.3189718,0.0009936752,0.00060395943,0.002423783,0.019034963,0.017686531,0.011028349,0.06797416,0.058571935,0.50075233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001347129,0.0001619811,0.7216126,0.00036175823,0.00012905002,0.0007846146,0.004062052,0.009785215,0.0038805865,0.0017215564,0.2572003,0.00016560823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96925485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95750725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057878137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057878137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052345403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41993725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128802453","doi":"10.7202/1074605ar","title":"Le préjudice de perte de solvabilité découlant d’une inscription négative au dossier de crédit du consommateur","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.01722183462386427,"score_gpt":0.2024246367469653,"score_spread":0.18520280212310103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128802453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.533348,0.0011322339,0.008014759,0.07648489,0.00046405554,0.00012325995,0.00027776393,0.000075011965,0.38007993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97133285,0.00022349291,0.0006897581,0.0066417614,0.000077329656,0.000020881904,0.000033485518,0.000015798789,0.020964706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886727,0.0030278128,0.0003963249,0.0009063259,0.004985416,0.0020113264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741858,0.0076101148,0.004647405,0.0023727093,0.00879699,0.0023869998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008771638,0.0003065197,0.00043247873,0.0013530768,0.0067094634,0.0046077278,0.0010880729,0.0031092314,0.014526231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035256073,0.00027344518,0.00042169346,0.0008468606,0.011078047,0.0017214115,0.0025700673,0.004006918,0.0011174488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003031943,0.00027343206,0.29834592,0.00027476062,0.0003060608,0.003112619,0.046411052,0.0010433318,0.005506447,0.5051312,0.045729123,0.09356272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011643198,0.00039474358,0.50929934,0.0010630415,0.00028961615,0.0039027047,0.05589259,0.0029872395,0.0064580147,0.120050445,0.29922438,0.00032157224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26352668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3653967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26352668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008293539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010191256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52398556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129721066","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/qgux6","title":"Contrat et responsabilité civile : pour un système juste en droit des obligations","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027400958541553617,"score_gpt":0.23219231282241448,"score_spread":0.20479135428086087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129721066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011103304,0.06525466,0.016050532,0.14576703,0.003872367,0.0001350289,0.0006539152,0.0001484382,0.7570147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4847233,0.033047702,0.009150168,0.02993042,0.0033269168,0.00026910313,0.00045552102,0.00032291512,0.4387739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99653876,0.0010393206,0.00012070117,0.0004428509,0.0012179823,0.00064031046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983651,0.00051971053,0.00017137222,0.00018065798,0.0005881745,0.00017502894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029090785,0.00074210606,0.00039791485,0.0014378848,0.006700064,0.010380832,0.0018283852,0.004758182,0.023470875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046418505,0.0004026178,0.00058583776,0.0018235954,0.017317224,0.0064067133,0.0031864494,0.007521572,0.003393921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059281347,0.000004943713,0.0001273275,0.000049974034,0.0000032083324,0.0000319667,0.0019210756,0.0000631793,0.000055267494,0.96561116,0.028303906,0.003821989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010878776,0.000017319911,0.0014727521,0.00038535282,0.000011364483,0.00012681111,0.0021078964,0.00023349903,0.0002731104,0.14173937,0.8535875,0.000034187724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24658832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2561653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24658832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026935901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021870606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49030602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129898271","doi":"10.32749/nucleodoconhecimento.com.br/ethics/car-wash","title":"Car Wash Operation and Odebrecht: A case that will end?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Científica Multidisciplinar Núcleo do Conhecimento","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Novelis (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Exposition (narrative); Language change; Politics; Business; Law and economics; Public relations; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03833097332584864,"score_gpt":0.25315553263053187,"score_spread":0.21482455930468322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129898271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38513502,0.004111213,0.0042025205,0.18709987,0.0011291101,0.000076144825,0.00006528534,0.00005801002,0.4181228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89998245,0.0016907199,0.0008411159,0.013128045,0.00020423648,0.000037887472,0.00002291002,0.000027163622,0.08406543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730825,0.00070881884,0.00005726534,0.00032320176,0.0004119583,0.0011905025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828523,0.00080378447,0.00015651983,0.00012293563,0.00021850345,0.00041304098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027884303,0.0004484081,0.00039424025,0.0009624285,0.019081712,0.010560092,0.0012746588,0.014549689,0.006344577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064487346,0.00049002195,0.00043183196,0.0010421164,0.014970757,0.006479558,0.0049852277,0.01160848,0.00062651833],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077644545,0.0001311165,0.0061799553,0.000060231534,0.000008600909,0.022891311,0.03796318,0.00041125074,0.00023544027,0.8850492,0.032588735,0.0144032845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002848203,0.00006418604,0.0069710705,0.0005827056,0.000033593366,0.012225682,0.19866894,0.00160229,0.001136177,0.14391945,0.63463193,0.0001354364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07900817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17452896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07900817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010146175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007949869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15709656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131380221","doi":"","title":"I knew it was coming! The dynamic interplay between anticipation and perception of psychological contract breaches","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Psychological contract; Perception; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04453033404566787,"score_gpt":0.28376845255136346,"score_spread":0.2392381185056956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131380221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9691946,0.00047773714,0.005934596,0.004348185,0.00007627234,0.000023954219,0.00010280915,0.000028778006,0.019813042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99846196,0.00013140914,0.00066706183,0.00024172537,0.000022330425,0.000008073103,0.00003197072,0.000014584745,0.00042082035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838245,0.0007680236,0.00006560758,0.00021585447,0.00039320803,0.00017488316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96605164,0.022777136,0.00661703,0.0011219669,0.0017909993,0.0016412376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004717588,0.00015411513,0.00024110769,0.00073082745,0.0008345223,0.0060827695,0.00044109207,0.0021491284,0.007061217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065632336,0.00048483384,0.00023436276,0.00067514344,0.0015662444,0.0049144826,0.0016378813,0.003595416,0.0004485302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004801907,0.0013663362,0.54920214,0.00069998624,0.000386632,0.0010561093,0.10699346,0.009095952,0.029747855,0.1448782,0.009891272,0.14188014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099260666,0.00053966575,0.8378964,0.00024212382,0.00011538007,0.0005201949,0.029448241,0.015286631,0.0012594312,0.10678983,0.0075530824,0.00024971747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041075274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031161015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007061217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008801009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082541286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024949312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134226088","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3494554","title":"A Hold-Up Problem With Behavioral Considerations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.019868349883975886,"score_gpt":0.21482466300747036,"score_spread":0.19495631312349448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134226088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16286378,0.0020054337,0.27299765,0.16847254,0.0010489408,0.00026206396,0.0015351789,0.00072183117,0.39009252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9470131,0.00042225132,0.007966637,0.007431843,0.0010172506,0.00014322136,0.00014291602,0.00015169187,0.03571102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99495345,0.0014889172,0.00026933616,0.0010535266,0.0011410944,0.0010936134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658211,0.022521073,0.002523936,0.004979502,0.0027286485,0.0014256882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00905674,0.00061118155,0.001916149,0.001254831,0.004394084,0.005436415,0.004149141,0.012801584,0.048947245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05196009,0.0012051384,0.0013336812,0.0014473089,0.0062485063,0.012956396,0.003083815,0.012117098,0.0023915388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006125844,0.000061315375,0.0010735935,0.00004242083,0.000028687113,0.00030260085,0.00040673753,0.00070010335,0.00019063932,0.98192364,0.0064378614,0.008771169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004241354,0.000021633732,0.0006191929,0.000024105648,0.000020705553,0.000121071535,0.00017246672,0.0038026036,0.00019248863,0.9907731,0.0041950024,0.00001529486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038731936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048634415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048947245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002361691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026084287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16374487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135585658","doi":"10.1007/s10551-021-04777-5","title":"Non-audit Engagements and the Creation of Public Value: Consequences for the Public Interest","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École Nationale d'Administration Publique; Queen's University; PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Public interest; Accountability; Audit; Public value; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Legitimacy; Business ethics; Public sector; Accounting; Value proposition; Business; Political science; Marketing; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.19014527551103177,"score_gpt":0.29348188699723554,"score_spread":0.10333661148620377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135585658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52180594,0.0019089496,0.02051657,0.0843725,0.00029298736,0.00012553264,0.00019783042,0.00007075096,0.37070894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951314,0.0001502629,0.0003244741,0.000764311,0.00009240071,0.00002208569,0.000011396984,0.000006901771,0.0034967705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866302,0.0075242114,0.00053285365,0.0008437174,0.002213487,0.002255543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84586626,0.11400086,0.017382434,0.00868579,0.00855728,0.005507317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012882974,0.00022115666,0.0005584326,0.0010552277,0.0037673782,0.011837035,0.001047011,0.007502552,0.010928686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0850734,0.00037720165,0.00047734717,0.0014838652,0.009829258,0.008804007,0.004846189,0.0062671187,0.0007830962],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024403115,0.00035783093,0.0146611165,0.000044568867,0.000029290004,0.00029680648,0.001832041,0.000836875,0.00027778427,0.9612356,0.0044999467,0.015684161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007306129,0.00003567405,0.00661801,0.00006148682,0.000021346668,0.00011832188,0.0017265296,0.0022988843,0.00041491498,0.9808117,0.007797955,0.000022176353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026699647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030422255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012882974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034271684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006325177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06813252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135685231","doi":"10.3138/cpp.2020-017","title":"Recognizing Indigenous Rights in Canada: Property Rights and Natural Resource Values","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Policy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Event study; Supreme court; Natural resource; Property rights; Resource (disambiguation); Stock (firearms); Natural experiment; Value (mathematics); Market value; Indigenous rights; Business; Economics; Law; Political science; Geography; Finance","score_opus":0.02254539718914506,"score_gpt":0.19039460226340904,"score_spread":0.16784920507426399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135685231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8453065,0.0022051882,0.0007444803,0.00798713,0.00003058724,0.000074297415,0.0016797278,0.000013696993,0.14195834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949003,0.0006835765,0.00017415854,0.00016902787,0.000007822294,0.0000059979493,0.0002187642,0.0000027099823,0.003837727],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831414,0.00013780607,0.000034093817,0.00012753892,0.0006789632,0.0007075266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99583995,0.0010552772,0.00094305753,0.00013728402,0.0013391003,0.0006853915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010641215,0.00020581266,0.00026335707,0.0016758706,0.0049837967,0.0042884178,0.0008962336,0.00067274447,0.00481893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070175813,0.00012797365,0.00026487955,0.0037208511,0.0041905832,0.0011740251,0.0010929503,0.0013847807,0.00013055997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016118764,0.0002204231,0.65569615,0.00016942206,0.00012214214,0.0007574472,0.012590864,0.0074901376,0.0007084723,0.23673515,0.015090547,0.07025804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025529438,0.000043915144,0.9087646,0.00018324207,0.000083482744,0.00010097089,0.019755797,0.0052976054,0.00059038046,0.019854195,0.045221016,0.00007935732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09098723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09098723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08614072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6601616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135912348","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3638","title":"Corporate Friction: How Corporate Law Impedes American Progress and What To Do About It by David Yosifon","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Foundation for Research, Science and Technology","keywords":"Corporate governance; Corporation; Argument (complex analysis); Shareholder; Stakeholder; Corporate law; Shareholder primacy; Law and economics; Perspective (graphical); Corporate security; Corporate communication; Stakeholder theory; Business; Political science; Accounting; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.03749548693218328,"score_gpt":0.22496192994453218,"score_spread":0.18746644301234888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135912348","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036816347,0.05634271,0.0042214277,0.67509687,0.0025935906,0.00003025797,0.00010109864,0.00005263197,0.22474505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80983484,0.054321833,0.0023913754,0.07831256,0.0029286665,0.000090004156,0.000109594446,0.00007284124,0.05193832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769706,0.0010338371,0.000049830567,0.00019175508,0.00071937114,0.00030819597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954751,0.002818634,0.00043999133,0.0001513733,0.000770035,0.0003448095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004317809,0.000305277,0.00039966262,0.0018534255,0.005524374,0.008718556,0.0007713715,0.0034295062,0.0031609868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010896031,0.00021506341,0.0002705382,0.0023380427,0.014309146,0.011366392,0.0029379518,0.00571592,0.0005709932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011174502,0.000026272042,0.00093854073,0.000040608324,0.00000503007,0.00005979395,0.004197788,0.0002893953,0.000039676375,0.9038785,0.07530937,0.01520373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017115035,0.000017350705,0.0022943004,0.00065299653,0.000011715513,0.00006584847,0.007046107,0.00054912904,0.00011231195,0.47471532,0.5144803,0.000037454407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030255672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023546709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030255672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070809703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060460004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060159147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136421970","doi":"","title":"Public Financeers as Overseers of Class Proceedings","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Plaintiff; Agency (philosophy); Class (philosophy); Economic Justice; Political science; Business; Finance; Public administration; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02202159084141355,"score_gpt":0.19793298864507192,"score_spread":0.17591139780365836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136421970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08065098,0.004597458,0.008374825,0.04717449,0.0009294824,0.00025859504,0.0001756223,0.0005618175,0.85727674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72171396,0.0020979708,0.0013855451,0.006489258,0.0011915702,0.00014565205,0.00011798773,0.000106873566,0.26675114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887229,0.002534194,0.00018431211,0.0008919928,0.0029584218,0.0047081127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840173,0.0058104596,0.003057552,0.0016152891,0.0028101527,0.0026892463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007946418,0.0004083202,0.00041002745,0.002832966,0.012333132,0.018357402,0.0018367235,0.0077520995,0.03096375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018392902,0.0006831038,0.00037207044,0.0021195959,0.010306257,0.0066620014,0.0034235567,0.00463094,0.0030201627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033384415,0.00009299513,0.0053694183,0.00004551014,0.000011495534,0.0005701808,0.010513969,0.0006042039,0.00030969156,0.83781046,0.09651409,0.048124626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050770446,0.00005093116,0.008794138,0.00018455027,0.00003197932,0.0003214598,0.009089173,0.0017526106,0.0004975801,0.03947944,0.93969166,0.000055628276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1919155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23138046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1919155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027472705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03450785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38159686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136520820","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1990648","title":"Contracts as a Barrier to Entry: An Experimental Study of Exclusive Dealing with Stipulated Damages","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Business; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.019119562434369134,"score_gpt":0.24964243773004047,"score_spread":0.23052287529567134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136520820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99033886,0.00009105938,0.0016670786,0.0004645317,0.000055085966,0.0003581027,0.00012232666,0.000023884284,0.006879005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934383,0.000112680944,0.0014658539,0.00026346382,0.000079427686,0.00041473508,0.000116864205,0.000032329077,0.004076424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914197,0.004533704,0.00057454116,0.0013632948,0.0012132254,0.00089559477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76411855,0.2000117,0.018498696,0.011361404,0.0018882789,0.004121445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014081305,0.0011793845,0.0023815245,0.0009748664,0.0027712197,0.006928759,0.003873672,0.0068143024,0.025663815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07968095,0.0010402635,0.0012787245,0.0012015542,0.007135309,0.008449676,0.0028800194,0.007218865,0.0016670163],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.14182055,0.30164945,0.040368427,0.0023236966,0.0012011109,0.003028941,0.014903509,0.024483424,0.033458203,0.3851881,0.007856681,0.043717917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.09359822,0.17199305,0.061009258,0.0006732926,0.0033590004,0.0013983694,0.014423044,0.16781741,0.024900924,0.44657,0.013383797,0.00087353843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003161834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002321493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025663815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022337013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034465378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08585405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137957378","doi":"","title":"Economie des procédures juridiques","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026350753694879017,"score_gpt":0.21220348487075413,"score_spread":0.1858527311758751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137957378","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084105,0.014775424,0.7669555,0.017645206,0.0011449774,0.000765981,0.0018593785,0.0010897525,0.11165884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.673582,0.012665411,0.22866976,0.0016642822,0.0031409424,0.0019318515,0.0015489423,0.00056852587,0.0762283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.963499,0.020155359,0.0010357847,0.0032627697,0.009549242,0.0024977953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89416635,0.087914824,0.0037442467,0.0070983386,0.0054513915,0.0016248918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027802724,0.0014095402,0.003097483,0.0049067605,0.0030045013,0.009935105,0.0036422368,0.0048650573,0.021640947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12590168,0.0016471274,0.0028530199,0.0041627935,0.0055336007,0.008559788,0.002862428,0.014806511,0.0036292076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039627458,0.00013614167,0.0011119049,0.00026848604,0.00012995525,0.0000571376,0.0001997835,0.02201772,0.0009322824,0.91186774,0.008483846,0.054398756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043422167,0.00030414664,0.007092261,0.00024967437,0.00016681905,0.0003471182,0.00021593404,0.17986153,0.003448562,0.76823217,0.0395335,0.00011410918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019454947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012010151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027802724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012612152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01353143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14703661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142750099","doi":"10.3386/w23460","title":"Governance and Stakeholders","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Accounting; Process management; Finance","score_opus":0.5142792228108264,"score_gpt":0.44658684503148877,"score_spread":0.06769237777933762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142750099","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054906745,0.0017578336,0.05842548,0.03984517,0.00024705386,0.00020352719,0.00019387649,0.000093760595,0.84432656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626788,0.00067655207,0.0027173338,0.002857411,0.0001418314,0.000112995716,0.000078925856,0.00003472726,0.030701337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956318,0.0021786431,0.00013836533,0.0007189988,0.00057445205,0.00075775344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963744,0.0013874224,0.00055396295,0.00053564226,0.00050708704,0.0006414957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004649623,0.00029362662,0.00028537613,0.0009143605,0.0032230464,0.0065391506,0.000701653,0.0021110405,0.010895404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010110521,0.00020277474,0.00026034773,0.0011207104,0.009228373,0.006853167,0.005448076,0.0023695955,0.0008550826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022738438,0.0000049830987,0.00060603436,0.0000072073276,0.0000019346398,0.000021797252,0.0007551796,0.00018333003,0.000042843403,0.99320906,0.0015846478,0.0035806808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075771472,0.0000117428135,0.0008815518,0.0000843182,0.0000044799576,0.000045116405,0.0013597307,0.00054248585,0.000079287995,0.8954946,0.10148215,0.0000069800753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004440118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039554317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010895404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034230293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004155719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036448777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146243673","doi":"","title":"The optimal amount of distorted testimony when the arbiter can and cannot commit","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chapters","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Arbiter; Commit; Adjudication; Computer science; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Computer security; Law; Computer network","score_opus":0.022262775187149492,"score_gpt":0.1828694145921238,"score_spread":0.1606066394049743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146243673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34420523,0.0050544464,0.3222536,0.05039108,0.00108534,0.0010661327,0.0012425377,0.0006540344,0.27404755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610081,0.0007637606,0.030627016,0.000908614,0.00026640974,0.00020493408,0.00010143279,0.000049545684,0.006070268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870516,0.006080885,0.0009034904,0.0016803967,0.002583967,0.001699749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9354468,0.048144907,0.004121871,0.0060511706,0.0034758113,0.0027594888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013740963,0.00088898285,0.0017073164,0.0018258465,0.0017687406,0.0054440596,0.002331047,0.0046561817,0.013428584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10954223,0.0010125759,0.00048390924,0.000926515,0.0047837277,0.008911097,0.004379352,0.0035897763,0.0019517832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002787439,0.00038741596,0.003413081,0.00056904566,0.00018876238,0.0010416548,0.00077026174,0.0565215,0.0063914955,0.79136413,0.008487688,0.12807746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005928627,0.0004982858,0.0036296349,0.0006333825,0.00018615692,0.00092922366,0.0015442624,0.072904065,0.0063780886,0.90230376,0.010263394,0.00013690321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015566777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016598642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013740963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035299067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004447782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07266998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151581196","doi":"10.7202/1076122ar","title":"La protection des consommateurs de services et produits financiers au Québec : constats tirés de l’analyse économique comportementale du droit","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.044794580524190504,"score_gpt":0.25056261675058994,"score_spread":0.20576803622639944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151581196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8508874,0.010275809,0.008942243,0.022630844,0.00012345037,0.00014913923,0.005104411,0.00006454795,0.1018222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796214,0.0024415592,0.0015287728,0.00067175,0.000023511242,0.00004235323,0.0007733484,0.000020370333,0.01487695],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977302,0.00051219115,0.00006919304,0.00024562245,0.0009891338,0.00045373815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98853207,0.0027359445,0.0015117326,0.00044955921,0.005795401,0.000975378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002721952,0.0003767632,0.00043017,0.0017068653,0.00277054,0.00432077,0.0008152576,0.0007325355,0.00854534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010646839,0.0002400908,0.0004565356,0.0035220662,0.0019219868,0.0018497003,0.0011894255,0.001675924,0.0004929326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038797068,0.00018318888,0.66173047,0.00084947725,0.0005454722,0.00067587406,0.030152341,0.01237562,0.0020478738,0.10646841,0.022412313,0.16217108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025728841,0.000113273854,0.86494344,0.0011933515,0.00018913063,0.00011257235,0.019504888,0.010885616,0.0012318431,0.008569772,0.093121886,0.000108468834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9796509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9855702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047202982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047202982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04363997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34248322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W31535859","doi":"10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01030","title":"Salary determination in the National Football League","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Medicinal Chemistry","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute on Aging; Canada Research Chairs; Rainwater Charitable Foundation; Azrieli Foundation; Massachusetts General Hospital","keywords":"League; Football; Salary; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02653989826821325,"score_gpt":0.240948015043287,"score_spread":0.21440811677507376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W31535859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46002772,0.0033482555,0.006188018,0.01449191,0.0015965478,0.00032309795,0.0017326414,0.00029605496,0.51199573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8323983,0.000977942,0.002926929,0.0016851844,0.00018894258,0.0000890051,0.00068746693,0.00003091612,0.16101526],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993469,0.00012420666,0.000020041904,0.00007481,0.00017524468,0.0002587914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934465,0.000055822766,0.000066411405,0.000026900043,0.00016595988,0.00034029546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006982041,0.00018237947,0.00016499321,0.0005345255,0.0015555285,0.0009812457,0.0004398744,0.0003949004,0.026541494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017234422,0.00006905404,0.00008717685,0.00040951514,0.00036805295,0.00023513894,0.0009284079,0.0005400695,0.0049892766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005193159,0.00049491733,0.15067099,0.00012610784,0.000029270313,0.00083496084,0.0015309704,0.0018639169,0.0044206427,0.043751374,0.16573235,0.63002515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007715292,0.0008853167,0.27490827,0.00020879402,0.000016053475,0.0009192055,0.008091393,0.0039545023,0.0040603923,0.0059858216,0.7008454,0.00004760948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015489135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04575876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026541494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001912289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031423026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08879018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156821613","doi":"","title":"The Vested Way: A Model of Formal Relational Contracts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.052745593670176436,"score_gpt":0.17698645954024037,"score_spread":0.12424086587006393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156821613","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037698254,0.0060169646,0.53383875,0.01808674,0.00037388108,0.00022428232,0.0006272871,0.00030866038,0.40282515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9046906,0.0032805647,0.048243716,0.0012510025,0.00039129227,0.00033401942,0.00019834531,0.00012595578,0.041484542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696153,0.0014751104,0.00009494926,0.00044849422,0.0005903064,0.00042955374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99584347,0.0021160915,0.0004875474,0.00060964323,0.00044684645,0.000496367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038668355,0.0005698033,0.0007185617,0.0013907228,0.0030304773,0.0077536954,0.0031732982,0.0039327126,0.018089116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00903732,0.0004971097,0.0014187909,0.002117496,0.008606003,0.01506294,0.003593403,0.0036487665,0.0022202781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003901111,0.000003816412,0.000039351497,0.000004590298,0.0000014483007,0.00001956049,0.00014626782,0.0007837964,0.000013954624,0.9980634,0.00025007216,0.00066998485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011031022,0.000007565713,0.0000244789,0.000015857486,0.0000029310388,0.00004878263,0.00007801466,0.006357369,0.000013544729,0.98753345,0.005901438,0.0000055837068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058116666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025121314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018089116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003953405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004058534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060514092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157790066","doi":"","title":"Did Weber Affect the Timeliness of Arbitration","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Arbitration; Scope (computer science); Supreme court; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Law; Business; Affect (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Original jurisdiction; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.026219690755355286,"score_gpt":0.2118431088312028,"score_spread":0.1856234180758475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157790066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9232996,0.0010956961,0.007473603,0.0050370023,0.00020496018,0.00010891064,0.00024535946,0.00006957157,0.062465344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99718153,0.00010692053,0.00049725914,0.00009885469,0.000048902144,0.0000122875435,0.000028398803,0.000015946518,0.0020099187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907933,0.0021500788,0.00080369937,0.001499948,0.0028508704,0.0019020805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85848475,0.09348201,0.03156275,0.006782034,0.0066184676,0.003069923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021905344,0.00015493434,0.0004960948,0.0016651009,0.0018482343,0.0054827966,0.0009217682,0.0014725674,0.00893594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20700379,0.00041556923,0.0005665127,0.0014249289,0.0040104934,0.0057521574,0.0014758813,0.0020105795,0.0009811579],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022568693,0.00033031817,0.37601054,0.00029484276,0.00032034167,0.0010781332,0.012488841,0.013877344,0.0037885183,0.48823154,0.007626715,0.09369608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034630208,0.0008307168,0.57715756,0.0004237753,0.00031706112,0.0011390066,0.01502578,0.018274236,0.011514318,0.2909514,0.083639614,0.00038025298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018524414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018225076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021905344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004956835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037347209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115847945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160365306","doi":"","title":"Arbitrability of Disputes Pertaining to Abusive Debt Collection Practices in the US: Striking the Balance between Efficiency and Fairness","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Debt; Business; Accounting; Actuarial science; Psychology; Finance","score_opus":0.031204350087918,"score_gpt":0.2336950230407161,"score_spread":0.2024906729527981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160365306","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8486496,0.0022012354,0.031222476,0.015710615,0.00012523532,0.00027965414,0.00021764141,0.00004659693,0.10154695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958806,0.00019221047,0.0014631746,0.00031189024,0.000047111917,0.00003358618,0.00003951287,0.000008170514,0.0020236766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95789015,0.024268579,0.0050311256,0.001953666,0.006884217,0.003972309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75860554,0.19120324,0.023281626,0.01274241,0.011669154,0.0024979247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05418386,0.00020865677,0.00079975044,0.0029850574,0.0067017963,0.010850905,0.0019030981,0.0040443055,0.0077205794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24040678,0.0004598752,0.0006049146,0.0036859927,0.006977104,0.008259531,0.006016069,0.0053632422,0.00054598524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000740144,0.0003358764,0.049313862,0.00019881551,0.00013224116,0.00081770355,0.027161606,0.0047073234,0.0016085126,0.8036116,0.0072637713,0.10410855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002003224,0.00016505203,0.044620357,0.00052237045,0.00016126412,0.00087244174,0.016975554,0.022489984,0.0033861552,0.87803817,0.03246658,0.00010179611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011178684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013907504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05418386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038624625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00674615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28655505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160593634","doi":"","title":"THE NOTION OF CAUSATION AND THE TORT OF NEGLIGENCE (COMMON LAW) / EXTRA-CONTRACTUAL PERSONAL LIABILITY (CIVIL LAW) IN CANADA: A COMPARATIVE LEGAL STUDY","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Font; Causation; Law; Plaintiff; Subject (documents); Tort; Liability; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08384578857365736,"score_gpt":0.28386225736186893,"score_spread":0.20001646878821155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160593634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57398146,0.026349802,0.003791926,0.028788563,0.00019799155,0.00013604919,0.00070156355,0.000024726072,0.3660279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889809,0.005096746,0.0008932971,0.00067238504,0.000021831298,0.000016372154,0.000073526215,0.000007420822,0.00423758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950599,0.0010412589,0.0001483919,0.00041080656,0.0020154603,0.0013241412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916978,0.0034454658,0.0010661138,0.00022450958,0.0028174035,0.00074873865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004027519,0.00026652895,0.0005645644,0.0064152544,0.016670212,0.00885581,0.0016527136,0.0021785062,0.0052338936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011847476,0.0003283616,0.0004359764,0.012416095,0.021191716,0.0035878154,0.0031074095,0.0023081056,0.00015867782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004253713,0.00006147351,0.030169327,0.0002856188,0.000037488157,0.00097065157,0.041846976,0.0013953196,0.00021876233,0.8961557,0.004392993,0.024423165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051129548,0.00009693471,0.31852055,0.0026685563,0.00028816986,0.0017423081,0.2953558,0.006649667,0.00040805378,0.12458244,0.24937545,0.00026091692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99459064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99659246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21020654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21020654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16706493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91604847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161073046","doi":"","title":"Private Governance and Animal Welfare","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Animal welfare; Welfare; Business; Corporate governance; Public economics; Procurement; Economics; Market economy; Marketing; Finance; Biology","score_opus":0.010577021309227129,"score_gpt":0.19811048414168544,"score_spread":0.1875334628324583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161073046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16951025,0.006994963,0.057209074,0.09729792,0.000353471,0.00029685485,0.0003204512,0.00009884603,0.66791815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738482,0.0012704771,0.0025295315,0.005889506,0.00029925542,0.00012454353,0.00005514697,0.000016233927,0.015967026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98977166,0.004758278,0.00043377327,0.0015695222,0.0017432185,0.0017235585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97878116,0.011092009,0.004548717,0.0028747777,0.0017269757,0.0009762359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011785876,0.00024194662,0.00038194892,0.00091796,0.004000734,0.0069819684,0.00075316546,0.0048748762,0.005341363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018911038,0.0003027072,0.0004149222,0.0012695888,0.01811203,0.0046916385,0.0038918122,0.0036181803,0.0004321428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047027124,0.00001644482,0.0014265506,0.0000119913775,0.000005761625,0.00002890742,0.00031666207,0.00032287074,0.000057302397,0.99303496,0.0012415025,0.0035322958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031993797,0.000068074536,0.005965987,0.00020665153,0.000015760255,0.00009251261,0.00086721184,0.0015161312,0.0002935996,0.91140914,0.079504766,0.000028189255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074242987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006276912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011785876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005772658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007001859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062330425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162892875","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139055345","title":"Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Competition (biology); Politics; Power (physics); Political economy; Political science; Ukrainian; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03564965396680461,"score_gpt":0.200300390860417,"score_spread":0.1646507368936124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162892875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83891124,0.009964515,0.0016181935,0.015603693,0.00012615015,0.000016745418,0.0021913052,0.000030370078,0.13153777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940262,0.0016738626,0.00028059204,0.0004832487,0.000053931395,0.000010073208,0.00058917655,0.000010333765,0.0028726063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845636,0.00048099295,0.000067407935,0.0002735667,0.00035255027,0.00036911908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974661,0.0010808696,0.0008138192,0.00017053055,0.0002306706,0.00023802875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009869834,0.00009115428,0.00047990071,0.0020365482,0.0015794999,0.003945881,0.00034022622,0.00057253515,0.0031886066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046899486,0.00015834288,0.00015288127,0.004932543,0.0027461369,0.0025206234,0.0014637427,0.0019283437,0.00037376425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017338395,0.00018983518,0.2559974,0.0002908353,0.00014333257,0.0010319817,0.01960149,0.0058647403,0.00052886887,0.53630215,0.038629808,0.14124615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003580407,0.000057889007,0.61166435,0.00040597864,0.00003562597,0.00046038165,0.01890635,0.0034595074,0.0006470963,0.1987238,0.16555165,0.000051618816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008855818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025057679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008855818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027335978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010648373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019833744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163420138","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3666336","title":"A Tale of Two Enforcement Venues: Determinants and Consequences of the SEC’s Choice of Enforcement Venue After the Dodd-Frank Act","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Law enforcement; Business; Economics; Criminology; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.019976436153789724,"score_gpt":0.23361438066265802,"score_spread":0.2136379445088683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163420138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96652603,0.0005398957,0.0009632798,0.013643485,0.000057383284,0.000044305878,0.00039290084,0.000017218597,0.01781558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961737,0.000069864385,0.00009596547,0.0005784457,0.000048357757,0.000009218024,0.00006779825,0.0000131166435,0.0029437076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739873,0.0010661536,0.000103875376,0.00030453695,0.00025611464,0.00087051664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9351619,0.04056231,0.009908609,0.0016218981,0.002963276,0.00978209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005381042,0.00017559816,0.0005130894,0.0015571661,0.0029468436,0.0063677267,0.0013196963,0.0038922061,0.028616091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021180304,0.0003088273,0.0005731455,0.0016323591,0.005002161,0.005333093,0.0027215765,0.0061407103,0.0019112554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022732404,0.0023975514,0.7735149,0.00007874076,0.0003086959,0.0008662034,0.0037782467,0.0039795265,0.00091325335,0.16361627,0.023296246,0.0249771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057622115,0.0011189003,0.809435,0.00035351206,0.000371266,0.00036525447,0.04471094,0.011801404,0.0017495225,0.10550664,0.023792146,0.0002191928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021067845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042474978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028616091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017335231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024201493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095730364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163885713","doi":"","title":"Canada : Le régime juridique du private enforcement - Les conditions du succès en droit civil","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"R-libre (Université Téluq)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Enforcement; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.007763121698290307,"score_gpt":0.15416381543488844,"score_spread":0.14640069373659814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163885713","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42700732,0.0191308,0.0017623899,0.096925646,0.00068254163,0.00021572475,0.022808567,0.00015108954,0.43131587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91158575,0.005125174,0.0003921006,0.001624245,0.00014243988,0.000047859852,0.0016154737,0.000038111888,0.07942885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960751,0.00027972987,0.0001235184,0.00026846438,0.001801619,0.0014515303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923424,0.0011896733,0.0012112318,0.00025035953,0.0035198552,0.0014863359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017598228,0.00021836237,0.00049976935,0.0017938217,0.0059772893,0.008503102,0.0013405886,0.0023241742,0.020796351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0110130105,0.0003577411,0.00032563508,0.0030165522,0.002318405,0.0011843538,0.0014773106,0.0025073313,0.0010772772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037247658,0.00018221406,0.17056367,0.00048493705,0.00014816893,0.0008995835,0.007835894,0.0054346104,0.00088550214,0.4316793,0.29421887,0.08729481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017447349,0.00009887589,0.5387718,0.0013413801,0.0001809349,0.0003288187,0.014390345,0.005480134,0.0010092527,0.024358181,0.41368845,0.000177266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9904883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0708417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0708417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15267593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51399493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165016173","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3204848","title":"Measuring the Gains from Labor Specialization: Theory and Evidence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada); HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Labour economics; Economics; Econometrics; Demographic economics","score_opus":0.04148375561893733,"score_gpt":0.23306586716986263,"score_spread":0.1915821115509253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165016173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9628713,0.0044461335,0.005008368,0.0013218283,0.00004230724,0.00005417819,0.0003240842,0.000027742431,0.02590396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974463,0.0009592277,0.0007862179,0.00015772627,0.000054032585,0.000013035098,0.00012004952,0.0000046045798,0.00045884665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941414,0.0030001274,0.00021250396,0.0009538146,0.0011492709,0.0005428883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9176192,0.054962967,0.014628809,0.007105527,0.0033952685,0.0022881483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00975868,0.0006807337,0.0008074632,0.0024759963,0.0006488158,0.0019162694,0.0010772921,0.0011700256,0.00519737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039828144,0.00031587266,0.0005620428,0.0028797705,0.0035044977,0.003000743,0.0021309035,0.0011996655,0.00091934035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010507763,0.00073919335,0.80305755,0.00054413395,0.0007066403,0.00015651275,0.0012611445,0.008810475,0.001251892,0.024862451,0.0024979215,0.15506124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014841871,0.0008660024,0.9102243,0.0003671346,0.00038767973,0.0002483984,0.0025442922,0.0076523554,0.0029954098,0.06940422,0.005118947,0.000042885702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004175874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043286486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00975868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015576881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011577217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051609457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171345356","doi":"","title":"Measuring the gains from labor specialization","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Productivity; Appeal; Quality (philosophy); Type (biology); Econometrics; Economics; Random assignment; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Statistics; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Macroeconomics; Geology","score_opus":0.11101164143643212,"score_gpt":0.339985444611844,"score_spread":0.22897380317541188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171345356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9736409,0.00026255578,0.013680944,0.00034928552,0.000016917787,0.0001571064,0.00069166353,0.00005304316,0.011147554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99625885,0.000067109075,0.0018077131,0.000073887815,0.00002921616,0.00007422059,0.00025219348,0.0000067171986,0.0014300671],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943633,0.0021849447,0.0003269293,0.0010788513,0.0010222085,0.0010237359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92786556,0.04182156,0.017612616,0.0069169654,0.0023617563,0.0034215609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008489633,0.00046842938,0.00081497844,0.0012741624,0.0004579692,0.0014481491,0.00086549105,0.0011452035,0.0095493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038831584,0.00039669432,0.0005129349,0.0014017158,0.0016402534,0.0013283917,0.0016522738,0.001158105,0.0012416017],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019700837,0.002219753,0.8219251,0.0003821369,0.00061572983,0.00043506434,0.0012706873,0.053228542,0.013828717,0.02832639,0.0028621908,0.07293558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021843599,0.0027410176,0.92728686,0.000048346297,0.00015866826,0.0002970273,0.00087549764,0.030587077,0.004840249,0.02889717,0.004001724,0.0000479659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014524146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017321348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0095493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016145777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006193742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044898033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172372830","doi":"","title":"Proximate Cause Untangled","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons at University of Maryland Carey Law (University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Proximate and ultimate causation; Duty; Harm; Tort; Plaintiff; Liability; Duty of care; Prima facie; Element (criminal law); Law and economics; Res ipsa loquitur; Damages; Business; Law; Actuarial science; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.01783456043345083,"score_gpt":0.1722412606114333,"score_spread":0.15440670017798247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172372830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014263742,0.030695545,0.26770887,0.08158355,0.005215019,0.00027948935,0.0005943212,0.0003765904,0.5992828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.789322,0.022282857,0.038812958,0.039416198,0.0045493105,0.00050714315,0.00053191144,0.00055167277,0.10402597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836151,0.0041687484,0.0010239067,0.004402664,0.0053940536,0.0013956316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812355,0.009430524,0.0014006044,0.004863792,0.002394668,0.0006749272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0128517095,0.0016542863,0.002482147,0.0038585733,0.0038587896,0.010990488,0.0035204145,0.008851291,0.030222265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031336848,0.0011376739,0.0027893651,0.0018938431,0.028708035,0.0217004,0.017354973,0.018533133,0.0035760168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013007256,0.000010311924,0.00034941328,0.000087415036,0.000023915061,0.00018112003,0.00044013764,0.00039033344,0.00009379427,0.98928386,0.0022867664,0.0068399305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010817173,0.000014154733,0.00033076768,0.00023380526,0.000032244498,0.0002952854,0.0002724362,0.00059535063,0.00015316562,0.94821876,0.049826,0.000017256096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052063935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004585274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030222265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071006906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008447376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101103544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174937614","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-73036-9_14","title":"Empirical Data and the Powerful Lessons Learnt About Class Actions in Quebec","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius gentium","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Plaintiff; Class (philosophy); Compensation (psychology); Actuarial science; Action (physics); Empirical research; Product (mathematics); Business; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.10654486796986351,"score_gpt":0.28714843938034557,"score_spread":0.18060357141048206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174937614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63128114,0.019420696,0.0067348876,0.051162228,0.000242915,0.000110201676,0.036527455,0.00014983282,0.2543707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545984,0.0038668404,0.0011191677,0.0011009842,0.000059740418,0.00002962045,0.0038914157,0.000043825814,0.03528988],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866176,0.00046014634,0.000057114266,0.0001701631,0.00036289138,0.00028792862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870985,0.0077376924,0.000971553,0.00063439785,0.0029420578,0.0006159177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025530206,0.00025408057,0.00042731056,0.0023139843,0.002629281,0.0030340797,0.00157414,0.0010904741,0.01758628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016395317,0.00023932058,0.00024626244,0.0059048883,0.0022435042,0.0023247115,0.0006834646,0.0017887623,0.00071442284],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021000151,0.00019365129,0.33569163,0.00035989672,0.00019440013,0.0005408627,0.0131313875,0.010862719,0.00023470847,0.31839114,0.1487538,0.17143582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005169726,0.000047699978,0.6626746,0.0010893189,0.00012953617,0.00008198529,0.018803507,0.01977836,0.00054575317,0.063036636,0.23365769,0.00010313153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98963636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02841535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02841535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0190337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20616877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174969816","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3522322","title":"The Allocation of Decision Authority to Human and Artificial Intelligence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Artificial intelligence; Operations research; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.04073737704742278,"score_gpt":0.2561906386696533,"score_spread":0.21545326162223052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174969816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1353003,0.0050235884,0.14130343,0.043838203,0.00059703743,0.00014454246,0.00016997417,0.00012961931,0.6734934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988634,0.00048273697,0.004138999,0.00079364027,0.00029368728,0.00006236341,0.000021572596,0.000028474444,0.0055444855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98595977,0.009147788,0.00037364624,0.0012595826,0.0020604096,0.0011988071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97110635,0.019532813,0.002024043,0.0032903098,0.002290315,0.0017562548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012915469,0.00040362697,0.0007491016,0.0034632506,0.0017481793,0.009580592,0.0012107458,0.003323505,0.012790073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041155636,0.000431549,0.0004831234,0.001905711,0.021159153,0.0068025426,0.0033490018,0.0020570103,0.0011057984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004458538,0.000026863627,0.0009359746,0.000023318677,0.000026376392,0.000032151733,0.0005316868,0.0020895074,0.00016780147,0.98384327,0.0013004954,0.0109780235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025543282,0.000014696347,0.001248191,0.000028082984,0.000008185374,0.000024967092,0.00025807766,0.0028969212,0.000093790455,0.98856086,0.006830394,0.000010262727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029081753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021700014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012915469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043931436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040683695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0683043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W318473558","doi":"","title":"The Arithmetic of Fair Dealing at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Arithmetic; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.022380102207488654,"score_gpt":0.18884738317882252,"score_spread":0.16646728097133387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W318473558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050696554,0.0072813667,0.002712243,0.037812866,0.0012902329,0.00004321654,0.0002509684,0.00006259251,0.94547683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49291715,0.007057224,0.003913341,0.03031106,0.0015352652,0.00013754003,0.00030377763,0.00017125257,0.46365333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919701,0.0009033247,0.00014604296,0.0009692355,0.0039167916,0.0020945582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968078,0.0007575358,0.00008405016,0.00022223646,0.0017532917,0.00037516086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003753901,0.00047986433,0.00054001214,0.0018670443,0.018673738,0.015342957,0.0018787043,0.0063090436,0.011330749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012605943,0.00046081757,0.0005186714,0.002303243,0.014235414,0.0040608896,0.00271282,0.010843318,0.0013726647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037826637,0.0000031862062,0.000072990915,0.000005667279,0.0000026635132,0.000030087198,0.00037062084,0.00015300392,0.00002440091,0.95434916,0.041126717,0.0038577872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015127684,0.000007395785,0.0010991707,0.00023202885,0.000022651982,0.000048160713,0.00076114485,0.00103607,0.00023810664,0.352241,0.64423496,0.00006416509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9136052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93271124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08639479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08182851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.099391945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5937102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185017104","doi":"","title":"Car Crashes, Personal Injury Litigation, and Frivolous Defenses in Alberta and Colorado","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pleading; Reputation; Crash; Settlement (finance); Plaintiff; Tort; Personal injury; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Criminology; Business; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.00947145548280618,"score_gpt":0.19402994303933535,"score_spread":0.18455848755652918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185017104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828332,0.0010205525,0.000074556665,0.00091148674,0.000017407197,0.00002501879,0.0002674337,0.000007644065,0.014842608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99628854,0.00066012767,0.00006772243,0.00021457343,0.000013029209,0.000009961244,0.00032182795,0.0000046074097,0.0024195672],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944804,0.00059887837,0.00013846497,0.00033542956,0.0022965425,0.0021502643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98330414,0.0040817866,0.0027555109,0.00039050868,0.0066301282,0.0028379308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022180881,0.00022452467,0.0005170299,0.0077315825,0.009450894,0.003663881,0.0024963669,0.0015717279,0.0037525124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013817492,0.0003457074,0.000314945,0.010521702,0.0060023325,0.0010437364,0.0026656091,0.0016023627,0.00028893736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004599822,0.00044173916,0.90425193,0.00013548302,0.00012877773,0.0019217868,0.033082884,0.0024306593,0.00071477203,0.019565145,0.010888256,0.025978453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020579082,0.00008956024,0.93807435,0.00010544708,0.000046264842,0.0003973596,0.051757503,0.0007416844,0.00024005194,0.00061220245,0.007858126,0.00005688004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9865406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056312315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056312315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036649615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40857637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189516590","doi":"","title":"Judging by the Numbers: Judicial Analytics, the Justice System and its Stakeholders","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Analytics; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Business; Computer science; Data science","score_opus":0.04663159262866061,"score_gpt":0.22782364111284473,"score_spread":0.18119204848418413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189516590","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11575334,0.009594134,0.010564901,0.4951099,0.0011362282,0.0001241074,0.0003672322,0.0002466535,0.36710358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95244336,0.0037302552,0.0020656788,0.015967209,0.00053662655,0.000051356106,0.00011250824,0.00009842958,0.024994556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96028125,0.014803537,0.0006667185,0.002639129,0.014840056,0.0067693656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9365602,0.028122537,0.0039806836,0.0021792636,0.020393409,0.008763955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021167388,0.00044685983,0.00071634405,0.0038926217,0.02592219,0.036972385,0.0027679934,0.0070499564,0.010717226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069484256,0.00047998258,0.00041426005,0.005235386,0.035941422,0.017688122,0.0105582625,0.008644775,0.0010571379],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005581821,0.00004922239,0.010203826,0.00014796258,0.00002395922,0.00039390646,0.06512838,0.0007409006,0.00041579115,0.78906465,0.061594516,0.07218102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002859145,0.0000603344,0.021778738,0.0012000204,0.00004472082,0.00017266053,0.13074017,0.002502405,0.0007934579,0.2953337,0.547153,0.00019217803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6008876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5974507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6008876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04679314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08524344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8029257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189815879","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74160","title":"Contract Cheating in Canada: National Policy Analysis Project Update and Results for 2021","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fleming College; University of Waterloo; University of New Brunswick; University of Toronto; University of Manitoba; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Humber Polytechnic; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Public administration; Business; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.038326602478913896,"score_gpt":0.27389735587835656,"score_spread":0.23557075339944267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189815879","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050508447,0.031525638,0.0036924826,0.15072136,0.003479463,0.004249385,0.6575373,0.001407489,0.09687855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25217703,0.056018274,0.039706852,0.04111541,0.00081932964,0.011286667,0.4984245,0.0014479236,0.09900403],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9550269,0.0051757293,0.0021362503,0.0016959925,0.027133647,0.008831454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80320215,0.013756659,0.0032119974,0.0046395063,0.15757571,0.01761393],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04910952,0.0016109071,0.0024778212,0.013301722,0.010430714,0.013710373,0.0050701895,0.003128732,0.014703461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08436113,0.0013685322,0.0036491598,0.028005987,0.002316941,0.0038690967,0.0059016086,0.0045625586,0.0036709672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051526376,0.00029525347,0.03956469,0.002430248,0.00042992097,0.00007841324,0.0018145468,0.0014598228,0.00019169106,0.012105519,0.850337,0.09077761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003851614,0.00021202078,0.30699342,0.005026749,0.00078645715,0.00006382985,0.010886436,0.0030667488,0.0009807239,0.0027295228,0.6685237,0.00034502437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99735594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99589336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9968713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.29667664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.689621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8157554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193413211","doi":"10.3917/apd.601.0268","title":"L’utilisation de renseignements personnels dans le contexte de la justice prédictive : le cas des outils actuariels d’évaluation des risques de récidive","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archives de philosophie du droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.04025118498878117,"score_gpt":0.25471931559342503,"score_spread":0.21446813060464387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193413211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1747704,0.008010071,0.18239218,0.07980039,0.0015457598,0.00020817677,0.00028377713,0.0002679482,0.5527213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9614285,0.0013930941,0.013153687,0.0018329802,0.00048763887,0.000121331876,0.000031975087,0.00009636902,0.02145443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97748125,0.011826066,0.00091191445,0.0018663891,0.006368384,0.0015459383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93300253,0.048500285,0.0049058,0.005304258,0.0068560904,0.0014310634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018966038,0.0006228787,0.0007070441,0.004826734,0.0046379347,0.014057935,0.0029126464,0.004515767,0.00803633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07653888,0.0004644297,0.00064231444,0.004440453,0.029892249,0.014509463,0.004359912,0.0055400464,0.00074549345],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019204866,0.000013936637,0.0013868469,0.000061646395,0.000008657813,0.00008377564,0.015120636,0.00043914135,0.00008189259,0.96832865,0.0014840907,0.012971491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020147685,0.00009588905,0.008710971,0.0009859152,0.000054838634,0.00040076958,0.019511249,0.005569678,0.0015354331,0.853782,0.1092081,0.00012494977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014373551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013399473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018966038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077861194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065137795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10030317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193487785","doi":"10.1162/rest_a_01097","title":"The Speed of Justice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"The Review of Economics and Statistics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Duty; Judicial reform; Event study; Civil procedure; Formalism (music); Political science; Construct (python library); Quality (philosophy); Business; Public economics; Economics; Computer science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.050322017588818956,"score_gpt":0.2583885373844031,"score_spread":0.20806651979558413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193487785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35958207,0.01460527,0.027373936,0.08620309,0.0013729347,0.000097869735,0.0010659982,0.0002655706,0.5094334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98333955,0.0015370013,0.0014847224,0.0021234206,0.00055137015,0.000028110182,0.00009390681,0.00005828449,0.010783635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931257,0.0026222114,0.00029907594,0.0011029762,0.0019581872,0.00089192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96248484,0.017402703,0.008647254,0.0040211086,0.005612967,0.0018311063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062889243,0.00019501497,0.0004664766,0.0019451206,0.0014022052,0.0059074247,0.0006606939,0.0015035772,0.015577439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044255402,0.00026452393,0.00032887916,0.0018405915,0.005105151,0.005641566,0.0021075467,0.0025353297,0.0016826319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019497727,0.000109602464,0.029839873,0.00019832839,0.00012566357,0.00012450776,0.0010807187,0.0049610315,0.0009810869,0.82085186,0.03258967,0.10894277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000851498,0.00022695313,0.10595146,0.00040338136,0.000084869374,0.0002701303,0.0015945,0.004708484,0.0018557542,0.7149916,0.16975443,0.000073236595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033369563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025872297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015577439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032799514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020411478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052111685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194585835","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3929092","title":"Addressing Environmental Justice through In-Kind Court Settlements","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Human settlement; Public economics; Cash; Welfare; Economics; Environmental justice; Punishment (psychology); Counterfactual conditional; Social planner; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Microeconomics; Counterfactual thinking; Finance; Market economy; Geography","score_opus":0.037668982033551526,"score_gpt":0.2471579327161824,"score_spread":0.20948895068263085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194585835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11380782,0.00078787975,0.080459625,0.024976613,0.001152027,0.0002695534,0.00019563168,0.00031510802,0.7780357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9461981,0.0002759196,0.0062884623,0.0027221795,0.0005322173,0.00009131678,0.000049755057,0.0000830037,0.04375922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872513,0.004361212,0.0005064352,0.0014854383,0.0027730688,0.0036225193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838573,0.009583473,0.0011223401,0.0020933587,0.002063717,0.0012798593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010722257,0.00062534667,0.0011300667,0.001769705,0.010104376,0.010743455,0.0035681704,0.011344213,0.039906446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042644106,0.0005809765,0.0009996721,0.0014414185,0.0051512932,0.011335339,0.010306617,0.0074977395,0.00300546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005619619,0.0001501906,0.0012767429,0.00005870519,0.00004316159,0.00055141095,0.0011591235,0.0036996277,0.00055408827,0.95916504,0.01351225,0.019773511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070462476,0.00007301193,0.00095583353,0.00009732756,0.00005327915,0.00020021235,0.001545513,0.010980786,0.0006532939,0.94930655,0.036023885,0.00003989537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055803754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014879422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039906446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002882292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069188303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13350034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196423935","doi":"","title":"Remedies Matter: Evaluating the Efficacy of Remedies in Public Law Litigation for Executive Action","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Law; Political science; Psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.07621682165307515,"score_gpt":0.2881865853019872,"score_spread":0.21196976364891207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196423935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92629194,0.0018327526,0.0058914414,0.007029834,0.00034215482,0.002150845,0.00020143855,0.000057478348,0.056202162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651176,0.00017379055,0.001239331,0.0006024628,0.00014258994,0.0005620939,0.00003054082,0.0000063582856,0.0007310909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8859551,0.06877141,0.008021879,0.0067081386,0.023501147,0.007042308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39548826,0.4905597,0.07888,0.0134861,0.0141708655,0.0074150427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.094377175,0.0007633967,0.0017529798,0.0032281226,0.004691921,0.006270021,0.0031160302,0.008618412,0.006639433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42945272,0.0005628944,0.0014509734,0.0020946236,0.013593923,0.014347451,0.005396179,0.007153883,0.0006321053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.026884697,0.037931688,0.2173331,0.004126449,0.0030990515,0.0015140056,0.030368553,0.051868014,0.0046853293,0.32922763,0.008210521,0.28475094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0108057,0.11956723,0.46574518,0.002909013,0.003962261,0.0004970554,0.03820243,0.06368258,0.009451547,0.24110734,0.043476146,0.00059351133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038146153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004821835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.094377175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007488817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00874581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49912018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197502058","doi":"","title":"THE LENGTH OF CIVIL TRIALS AND TIME TO JUDGMENT IN CANADA: A CASE FOR TIME-LIMITED TRIALS","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil procedure; Economic Justice; Jurisdiction; Jury; Political science; Legitimacy; Context (archaeology); Law; Trial court; Dilemma; Jury trial; Supreme court; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.08944784066769994,"score_gpt":0.25397640823777407,"score_spread":0.1645285675700741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197502058","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36309847,0.049784563,0.012545037,0.3936665,0.002252552,0.0016384874,0.011941858,0.00021862026,0.16485395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9387831,0.009963275,0.007282745,0.028550746,0.0008130888,0.0005137897,0.0013588556,0.00021942606,0.012515076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93568045,0.012605588,0.0043423716,0.005361321,0.02876092,0.013249379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68340755,0.15867628,0.029642906,0.011405945,0.0800786,0.036788765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04806219,0.00047810966,0.002027611,0.005206801,0.014761749,0.01013452,0.0073564393,0.0035183828,0.00915924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2555263,0.00076720247,0.0021500508,0.012424189,0.011650808,0.006307083,0.0056512603,0.00988812,0.00044420548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003185475,0.00044009576,0.29043168,0.0027253595,0.0012494555,0.0023147867,0.025049832,0.0059448285,0.0005404122,0.27172935,0.11813008,0.27825853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011152826,0.0007487261,0.57604945,0.008639686,0.002276702,0.0009847794,0.036868695,0.011149243,0.0010925321,0.1005866,0.25944784,0.001040486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99574065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16953176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16953176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3927631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9632254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197749346","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3906039","title":"The Disappearing Outperformance of Post-reorg Equity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Economics; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.02002525034448574,"score_gpt":0.23002687491681945,"score_spread":0.2100016245723337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197749346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95790166,0.00048013017,0.0004682889,0.008408116,0.000110134395,0.0000061215337,0.00026698026,0.000082207356,0.03227643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99517643,0.000060052273,0.000038640916,0.00029492538,0.00008565613,9.978895e-7,0.00005692558,0.000011908979,0.0042743427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985097,0.00020720658,0.00006661931,0.00026268588,0.00051840657,0.00043537718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98524123,0.004411091,0.00512141,0.001421064,0.0019874373,0.0018176856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030302485,0.00012786557,0.00040340348,0.00061361806,0.0008176764,0.0024283344,0.000725781,0.0012571346,0.01354646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017895317,0.000101966376,0.0001962455,0.00051733037,0.0014570742,0.0019468617,0.0008873643,0.001824104,0.0014656145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020473183,0.00084036315,0.43904352,0.00018782903,0.0002922552,0.0013867156,0.005169872,0.0026254863,0.009557093,0.23970549,0.056454815,0.24268928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000686949,0.00069011824,0.9124339,0.000058231926,0.0001295485,0.0003406641,0.0027949563,0.0026141938,0.005509564,0.03440517,0.040910996,0.000043905864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009687247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013599979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01354646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009848558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010689955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04531747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199595471","doi":"","title":"Jurisprudence récente en droit de la franchise","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Franchise; Jurisprudence; Art; Law; Business","score_opus":0.010037213229669956,"score_gpt":0.21594986375086161,"score_spread":0.20591265052119165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199595471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06734372,0.16733593,0.0045830705,0.121597365,0.0017322435,0.000028353368,0.0002217521,0.000053555363,0.63710403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8511193,0.051835943,0.0014106655,0.020874064,0.0013217014,0.000033782548,0.0001245722,0.000056803317,0.07322308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908777,0.0031564273,0.00040819342,0.0014357566,0.002627726,0.0014941464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98659384,0.007902368,0.0009978991,0.00053521537,0.0033172169,0.00065340055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006230577,0.00035565672,0.0004249174,0.0024871684,0.011815431,0.011362624,0.0013896358,0.005308989,0.006537354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010924367,0.00040684253,0.0004039977,0.0036610723,0.018637229,0.004371376,0.002812728,0.006987111,0.00069078663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014423635,0.000013177683,0.0014583,0.0001970745,0.000014440674,0.00041450516,0.012229454,0.0002945792,0.00023396882,0.9497711,0.017864564,0.017494526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012028221,0.00003280491,0.011428259,0.001453105,0.000034973607,0.000595296,0.009415546,0.00040161674,0.0004549729,0.053428385,0.92266303,0.000079878446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4220777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51870054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4220777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035847653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022473881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83924186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199900533","doi":"10.47577/tssj.v23i1.4137","title":"Damage compensation for innocent defendants and Convicts in Iran and the Canadian legal system","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technium Social Sciences Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Convict; Compensation (psychology); Punishment (psychology); Law; Clearance; Criminal law; Criminology; Constructive; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05155715002048262,"score_gpt":0.24837255688036808,"score_spread":0.19681540685988547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199900533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.957232,0.0013088051,0.00016926021,0.0076802936,0.00005380112,0.00009027547,0.0005129024,0.000013832565,0.032938913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99322045,0.0007134748,0.0001649018,0.00038707623,0.000016062479,0.0000102488475,0.00023554731,0.00000329035,0.0052489615],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948467,0.00031343653,0.00012161617,0.00026974062,0.0017643807,0.0026842137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951186,0.00029844858,0.0008889722,0.00010580824,0.0023115694,0.0012765253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002108322,0.000280289,0.00035902846,0.0040342133,0.008298404,0.0027851295,0.0015828566,0.0011643786,0.0053833984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009654812,0.00026628206,0.0004490089,0.0045011546,0.0028684908,0.000995229,0.0017693352,0.0016084809,0.00021308189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038263405,0.00038235958,0.7838581,0.00021097242,0.00014564754,0.0025368761,0.015570973,0.0022348966,0.0005353985,0.08785477,0.032050867,0.07423648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069313195,0.00010173321,0.9214071,0.000160693,0.00012723602,0.00056720374,0.033619683,0.003410357,0.00023239951,0.0034349898,0.03673573,0.00013353158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98972195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9953949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07471556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07471556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08403468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54210186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203332085","doi":"","title":"Avengers, Avoiders and Lumpers : The Incidence of Disputing Style on Litigiousness","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Style (visual arts); Landlord; Context (archaeology); Personality; Empirical research; Social psychology; Sociology; State (computer science); Big Five personality traits; Psychology; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Geography","score_opus":0.012609363109160502,"score_gpt":0.2052627158660098,"score_spread":0.1926533527568493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203332085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983798,0.000045038538,0.00008500527,0.000038243288,0.0000015853639,0.0000024717745,0.000017132923,0.0000012819373,0.0014295571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99980515,0.000021611539,0.00003303944,0.0000063550106,0.0000049476544,0.0000013262137,0.000017364993,0.0000011410151,0.000109001616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973369,0.0011818917,0.00023024934,0.00022490768,0.000702335,0.00032369103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9493683,0.023118215,0.019740166,0.0025247901,0.001984536,0.0032640197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021501624,0.00015950395,0.00023164821,0.002304227,0.00084697484,0.0017035819,0.00042677642,0.00051312824,0.003977061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037315432,0.00017045831,0.00019021718,0.0014722288,0.0019558056,0.0014554441,0.0019100421,0.0008579003,0.0003813237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012754786,0.000049725648,0.98673195,0.000010657424,0.000024324161,0.00015916138,0.0035940043,0.000067076675,0.00036573008,0.00070870336,0.000092823495,0.008068357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003636272,0.0000726034,0.991392,0.000018639288,0.0000120310315,0.000613891,0.0059487172,0.0004153028,0.0001529733,0.00095344766,0.0004049311,0.00001176487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013577472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021802762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003977061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002776924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024587766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013304591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203635375","doi":"10.12957/redp.2021.62257","title":"CLASS ACTIONS IN QUEBEC: HIGHLIGHTS OF A UNIQUE PROCEDURE","year":2021,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Res judicata; Class (philosophy); Appeal; Legislature; Action (physics); Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Authorization; Law; Business; Sociology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.026191584130454738,"score_gpt":0.2544100424982826,"score_spread":0.22821845836782784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203635375","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18681164,0.007535516,0.030166192,0.040265266,0.00084163743,0.00068975537,0.001729927,0.00041392804,0.73154616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83997697,0.0016684864,0.0118456,0.0036712969,0.00014249799,0.00014807346,0.0002711755,0.00006565633,0.14221027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960675,0.00066383247,0.00013504,0.00065165246,0.0012707285,0.0012111756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652135,0.0013350509,0.00025361634,0.00039508988,0.0010457569,0.00044912595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002548452,0.0002851151,0.00027309058,0.0013738844,0.010480761,0.0064376723,0.0017797194,0.002834579,0.010700131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005706662,0.00028772015,0.0005235573,0.0018388815,0.0065535707,0.0012625277,0.001978935,0.0031277523,0.0005707429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043484182,0.00005592507,0.008500679,0.00008720361,0.00002381796,0.0008790604,0.004355576,0.002629015,0.0010943642,0.9006517,0.027725093,0.053953946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081804115,0.000099288176,0.071523935,0.00035517995,0.00009593605,0.00071055064,0.005934283,0.008346627,0.0020784987,0.054479994,0.8560557,0.000238187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98502296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98502296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08167441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.094489574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5925921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204302971","doi":"10.11575/prism/34294","title":"Integrated Resource Management in Alberta: Past, Present and Benchmarks for the Future","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Resource management (computing); Computer science; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Business; Data science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.03619296814240032,"score_gpt":0.22840200183435833,"score_spread":0.19220903369195802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204302971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25208148,0.13182856,0.017333163,0.16425472,0.0009095143,0.00020000273,0.0020179884,0.000596819,0.43077773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8966353,0.03731375,0.015535816,0.0036294232,0.0002610944,0.00004034154,0.0010096577,0.000046311565,0.04552817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975756,0.00026031636,0.00005506445,0.00013488803,0.0013301563,0.00064404256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720013,0.00048497366,0.00021374362,0.00010886037,0.0013103589,0.00068189675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029140427,0.00035105002,0.0003351165,0.002099823,0.0029894803,0.008592107,0.002186404,0.0012151905,0.0039902898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037390545,0.00015750308,0.00027153984,0.005780696,0.005104909,0.0021248255,0.002155696,0.0014170132,0.00023059464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014992006,0.00014863836,0.039984666,0.0006177386,0.00006860568,0.00043841125,0.002889796,0.014470044,0.0005152802,0.52314353,0.06335709,0.35421628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007500078,0.00013660618,0.16486646,0.0017405647,0.0001315652,0.00027383905,0.024102423,0.020391043,0.000985313,0.22500288,0.56210726,0.00018702254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95810634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9810604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9095316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0904684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12706445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6563972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206772216","doi":"10.7202/1082605ar","title":"L’interprétation des clauses base-réclamation dans les contrats d’assurance de responsabilité civile au Québec","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.041058241778888165,"score_gpt":0.25751698789548355,"score_spread":0.21645874611659538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206772216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19833505,0.0031195125,0.02042233,0.02364713,0.0006621522,0.00010150737,0.0006457607,0.00014497199,0.75292164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88801235,0.00081395684,0.0029582332,0.0020820897,0.00006466683,0.000028551949,0.0001391123,0.00006787672,0.10583318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828964,0.0004559755,0.00004417589,0.00022435223,0.00059223454,0.00039353926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740136,0.00066692446,0.00015398467,0.00013064497,0.0015147779,0.00013229556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014539652,0.00039150508,0.00025325897,0.0008634326,0.006541712,0.0046311007,0.0010377606,0.0018999795,0.012277595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032729434,0.00027365016,0.00029790594,0.00092780875,0.008440796,0.0017940934,0.0013269236,0.0031146663,0.0005722146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005525598,0.000015268986,0.004360225,0.00011310295,0.000016353835,0.00058579893,0.06621692,0.000566441,0.0021029091,0.8935568,0.014249006,0.01816206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039447328,0.00005953126,0.034156494,0.00061579753,0.0001040567,0.00046256973,0.09798941,0.0026095072,0.0047847056,0.06599333,0.79300916,0.00017594882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9417149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9546635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058285117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04444008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026328055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3224368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210404684","doi":"","title":"Rescission Under the Ontario Arthur Wishart Act: Quantifying the Remedy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rescission; Damages; Perspective (graphical); Permission; Law and economics; Accounting; Law; Business; Political science; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04071913738668874,"score_gpt":0.22611294460018225,"score_spread":0.18539380721349352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210404684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10798021,0.003731591,0.030976644,0.026682364,0.00071283826,0.0005453446,0.0011268574,0.00027703433,0.82796717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9268575,0.0015959382,0.007625386,0.0036506439,0.000383617,0.00020855562,0.0002558564,0.000067318244,0.05935525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9609304,0.0055505014,0.0017864302,0.001946526,0.02480518,0.004981025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827623,0.0050651184,0.0020234252,0.0024027394,0.007060171,0.0006863465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011820744,0.0005985943,0.0008341928,0.0034962264,0.008649892,0.008603809,0.0034344152,0.010643961,0.0070920084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034850392,0.00066001393,0.001300727,0.0026380045,0.011245308,0.0039454405,0.004243954,0.0057234103,0.001071322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026352405,0.000028647526,0.0034791,0.000056108074,0.000028748076,0.00019918065,0.0008981428,0.0026800274,0.000261563,0.974128,0.011278725,0.0069353175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011288292,0.00023266955,0.03418195,0.0009065377,0.00039645378,0.000621316,0.003957316,0.022693934,0.0034559488,0.6174159,0.31559336,0.0004316915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48265502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6120095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51734495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030406537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05036507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9596913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211067025","doi":"10.3982/te3357","title":"Renegotiation of long‐term contracts as part of an implicit agreement","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Microeconomics; Term (time); Economics; Incentive; Contractible space; Welfare; Continuation; Moral hazard; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01777665516898841,"score_gpt":0.22468493905288683,"score_spread":0.20690828388389843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211067025","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35962918,0.00045238703,0.58339036,0.002006971,0.00015084803,0.0004384826,0.00016157985,0.00023583024,0.05353442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9453038,0.00020813318,0.040913194,0.00010572833,0.000051304964,0.0002700501,0.000052930627,0.000032620937,0.01306227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99246746,0.0042199637,0.00034117253,0.0011337548,0.00096879696,0.00086880097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97502315,0.014798887,0.0045459988,0.0034673167,0.0010353524,0.0011292956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075598527,0.0009359738,0.0011508552,0.00045336375,0.0015443916,0.0031785755,0.0035475332,0.003851218,0.0050482084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023231827,0.00085030193,0.0013849259,0.0007230352,0.0043753185,0.006678443,0.0030260952,0.0049128667,0.00077893434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039751772,0.00039062992,0.002194976,0.00011679122,0.000097397424,0.0007898346,0.00095490145,0.063160956,0.0036554337,0.9120954,0.0007688072,0.015377362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030584744,0.0005372245,0.0009688526,0.000075875876,0.00010013563,0.00046353607,0.0004112014,0.4422468,0.0037449296,0.5422802,0.008763793,0.00010163913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016916872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001656362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075598527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021503055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026047025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03998077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212690775","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3964115","title":"Clinging Onto the Cliff: A Model of Financial Misconduct","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; White-collar crime; Pecking order; Order (exchange); Economics; Empirical research; Empirical evidence; Comparative statics; Law and economics; Criminology; Microeconomics; Political science; Law; Finance; Psychology","score_opus":0.031325814591583706,"score_gpt":0.22146223797017436,"score_spread":0.19013642337859066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212690775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27685934,0.002259995,0.3128704,0.07919533,0.0010113127,0.00047342802,0.002599044,0.0009394316,0.32379177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.922125,0.00094983773,0.009786384,0.001353755,0.00042255752,0.00020254434,0.00028156376,0.0001466887,0.0647316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996628,0.0015205813,0.00011732645,0.0006250686,0.00037708235,0.0007318561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780764,0.014611716,0.0021360917,0.0014574168,0.001546103,0.002172391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067788116,0.0014041527,0.0028896567,0.0035891219,0.004967578,0.010135912,0.009359952,0.018633265,0.03661312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03215379,0.0015397399,0.0020658004,0.004119891,0.00819441,0.012235338,0.004634434,0.009064532,0.0032993364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010547489,0.00014747826,0.0011818284,0.00004429976,0.000033047614,0.0005902496,0.0005990757,0.07145332,0.000117835196,0.9126935,0.0078086606,0.0052252915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011080261,0.000053769472,0.00036326516,0.000038381604,0.00002730875,0.00020682537,0.00029611707,0.23223765,0.00003152873,0.7639132,0.002675857,0.000045453184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028500957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017290305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03661312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005361885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005350159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122483134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213683609","doi":"10.1561/108.00000056","title":"Judicial Deference, Procedural Protections, and Deal Outcomes in Freezeout Transactions: Evidence from the Effect of MFW","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law Finance and Accounting","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Judicial deference; Business; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.024542686069930885,"score_gpt":0.2340208079179922,"score_spread":0.20947812184806133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213683609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974585,0.00019393761,0.00009039085,0.00015457896,0.0000063958196,0.00002679885,0.000021070358,0.0000024644396,0.0020458729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903643,0.000110425884,0.00007691381,0.00013498976,0.000026951337,0.000019909432,0.000035358953,0.0000022036418,0.0005568453],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910857,0.0040883683,0.0005183587,0.0008266875,0.002173961,0.0013069435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90098315,0.047537904,0.037428226,0.005220321,0.0031412805,0.0056891255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0121580735,0.00024442407,0.00058008754,0.0009460399,0.0018655093,0.0027008206,0.0011717125,0.0023799944,0.004054234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06805738,0.00039117175,0.00057691167,0.00068548776,0.0033138776,0.0020941333,0.0022438157,0.0033280854,0.00050087913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013415566,0.022621598,0.8202731,0.0002924401,0.0005879446,0.0021999362,0.020219702,0.0023782863,0.00488258,0.016529426,0.0030201406,0.09357927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006331261,0.0060561514,0.97493106,0.0001465465,0.00017984454,0.0003661401,0.004428236,0.0019963547,0.0018286903,0.0065864595,0.0027625556,0.000084750245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068242652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008069626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0121580735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001261976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012473862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06429887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213863294","doi":"","title":"Characterizing the risk of fairwashing","year":2021,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"","keywords":"Transferability; Black box; Generalization; Meaning (existential); Computer science; Fidelity; Post hoc; Range (aeronautics); Econometrics; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Economics; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06572243966935781,"score_gpt":0.16137662337327774,"score_spread":0.09565418370391993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213863294","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24844947,0.0010232436,0.7337919,0.005941339,0.00009559721,0.00033050464,0.0002356355,0.00042663523,0.009705654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658527,0.00028826474,0.03190267,0.00037466848,0.00011107336,0.00017296917,0.00007722717,0.00008370315,0.0011367714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9761629,0.012193984,0.0010959432,0.0036432107,0.0050461334,0.001857839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67697644,0.25336093,0.022718878,0.038352557,0.005412999,0.0031782102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034058753,0.0015843388,0.0017322568,0.0021012812,0.002060896,0.0045867325,0.0030504528,0.005453437,0.0030912638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20602553,0.0010399171,0.0017257171,0.0009812901,0.009838088,0.0112271905,0.0077536036,0.008088077,0.00032875128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004982951,0.00016264769,0.015531449,0.00029551826,0.0005186781,0.00062157115,0.0012464889,0.30263212,0.0033243885,0.64317226,0.0016528498,0.03034372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041896543,0.00013955915,0.001251951,0.00008563342,0.00008460389,0.00021530171,0.00015198813,0.4036773,0.002379581,0.5908733,0.0010307409,0.000068182024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018562071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076738995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034058753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034123396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002183271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18012202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214237171","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v22i13.3914","title":"The Common Law Trust as a Liable Party: The Panama Case","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Money laundering; Jurisdiction; Business; Terrorism; Common law; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.027215919282183403,"score_gpt":0.19580546729713846,"score_spread":0.16858954801495507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214237171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38261753,0.0033308368,0.009493649,0.0814032,0.00023874964,0.0001625644,0.00010618039,0.000051075116,0.5225962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98239696,0.0005235131,0.00053085334,0.0028651527,0.000095527495,0.00006532264,0.000010406218,0.000008549952,0.013503726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940919,0.0023459895,0.00017999817,0.00068513287,0.00076515274,0.0019317571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947413,0.0026860381,0.0007025463,0.00050331815,0.0005901855,0.00077651814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004590971,0.00040559715,0.0005733146,0.00094903534,0.014767768,0.010172246,0.0012824722,0.011988432,0.0072137685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011213383,0.00046876757,0.0006336228,0.0014203483,0.0115522565,0.010620938,0.0076881167,0.0095909815,0.00065568165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039712406,0.000040475927,0.0018811788,0.000017714694,0.0000099076615,0.0039476105,0.0048953164,0.0003228385,0.000110173976,0.98285884,0.0031974136,0.002678888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019165981,0.00021097965,0.004511942,0.0005007454,0.00016810982,0.007295001,0.022313492,0.0105067305,0.0010427297,0.7397917,0.2132982,0.0001687451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037172206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029949738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037172206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006881102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048385235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07391167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217364561","doi":"10.4337/9781788118286.00009","title":"Introduction to Business Law and Economics for Civil Law Systems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil law (Civil law); Comparative law; Commercial law; Law; Public law; Political science; Divergence (linguistics); Private law; Principal (computer security); Empirical legal studies; Economic law; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.026782521305272235,"score_gpt":0.19349332545033054,"score_spread":0.16671080414505832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217364561","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009891889,0.083213985,0.019155024,0.027701162,0.0030436867,0.000051116982,0.0005802528,0.0001926458,0.86507285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059152126,0.13416453,0.017810484,0.010939158,0.0071205953,0.0002650065,0.0006732116,0.00028885022,0.769586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956495,0.00011440062,0.000018621926,0.00004989806,0.00020680456,0.0000453479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922574,0.0005144053,0.000039125385,0.000052441846,0.00012315252,0.000045164477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005393354,0.0007347567,0.00046342958,0.0016346353,0.0011809438,0.0029600777,0.0005982529,0.0018999858,0.03451936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013880143,0.00038105444,0.00038199828,0.0028836573,0.0032453018,0.0034137927,0.00093878445,0.003540888,0.008766723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002012873,0.000011602023,0.000079776546,0.00008478558,0.0000027239207,0.000041866246,0.0001595547,0.00043083625,0.00005486048,0.853255,0.12363018,0.02224682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001457737,0.0000035025864,0.00030144784,0.00018308846,0.0000014591096,0.000075149095,0.00007475117,0.0002837144,0.00002606502,0.2734252,0.72561973,0.0000045322126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006167574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006658869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03451936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030550284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021149535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115478694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W343505827","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198298960.001.0001","title":"Multi-Party Actions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07829092734543272,"score_gpt":0.2383142094261513,"score_spread":0.1600232820807186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W343505827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004515805,0.0014424132,0.020884076,0.003169589,0.00041032865,0.00013576729,0.00008368896,0.000084995845,0.96927345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29098123,0.0024529987,0.010101478,0.0036553757,0.00063347165,0.00032875047,0.0002139727,0.00015471106,0.691478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911907,0.001708045,0.00041451916,0.0012491648,0.0043403907,0.0010972655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951946,0.0022383584,0.00037364286,0.0011835755,0.0006897078,0.00032004726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033216197,0.000646134,0.0005460724,0.001503565,0.0034093622,0.0072289947,0.0021639667,0.00456839,0.062137917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064031505,0.00040978208,0.0010804213,0.0010905551,0.0053289086,0.006458072,0.007406087,0.006292859,0.009610174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070019973,0.000024499392,0.00015654114,0.000032325937,0.0000044706026,0.00013863605,0.00079380115,0.0003405076,0.00012499308,0.9616054,0.0152975125,0.021474395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011494927,0.00003723533,0.0007565671,0.00034133298,0.000014420647,0.00049031695,0.00074287155,0.0014001813,0.00065784,0.2951229,0.70040333,0.00002163157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025961774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003258569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062137917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035583153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035450512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20787203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W346474912","doi":"","title":"Taking the Costs of Consent Seriously: An Alternative Understanding of Legal Efficiency","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Allocative efficiency; Process (computing); Economics; Premise; Outcome (game theory); Transaction cost; Empirical legal studies; Law and economics; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Legal profession; Computer science; Legislature","score_opus":0.07319940104855975,"score_gpt":0.2638709908323736,"score_spread":0.19067158978381382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W346474912","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03543141,0.0028138529,0.6198958,0.04544558,0.00023078863,0.00041895127,0.00023868462,0.00013629638,0.29538867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.912371,0.0018636705,0.059943046,0.0030603409,0.00065839465,0.00081539346,0.00009593495,0.00016184757,0.021030432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.972232,0.013127397,0.0011894845,0.00283951,0.008165535,0.002446154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564494,0.030645818,0.0028588835,0.005779109,0.0036321974,0.0006346543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022068799,0.0015312211,0.001688084,0.0043102,0.0029071635,0.015288727,0.0049830023,0.009353447,0.00935845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037462536,0.0008500399,0.00284524,0.0028908425,0.03318205,0.027251197,0.0065939906,0.008601459,0.0009186026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031933482,0.0000059113354,0.00006752583,0.000012477712,0.0000030645501,0.000014299452,0.0001203062,0.00089123525,0.00002357669,0.9978998,0.000107071755,0.000851575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012075339,0.00001257747,0.00012426251,0.00004674956,0.000008612811,0.00003778457,0.00012596323,0.004137824,0.000114573304,0.99138314,0.003988077,0.000008381463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031314997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016666657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022068799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00998405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077434923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11671233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W350415636","doi":"10.2307/20141859","title":"The Luck of the Draw: Using Random Case Assignment to Investigate Attorney Ability","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The University of Chicago Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Public defender; Defense attorney; Luck; Natural experiment; Plea; Right to counsel; Law; Legal ethics; Psychology; Political science; Supreme court; Criminal justice; Statistics","score_opus":0.03840572026592548,"score_gpt":0.2230084178892135,"score_spread":0.18460269762328801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W350415636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65396875,0.0006883365,0.32054737,0.0015111183,0.00037962978,0.0077475314,0.0010330456,0.00033353848,0.013790676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9380394,0.00007402788,0.052257095,0.0010419588,0.00013304714,0.0060330266,0.00048522238,0.00007615463,0.0018599286],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8031019,0.17101239,0.004568497,0.009598441,0.009884521,0.0018343297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57022065,0.33104667,0.03774765,0.050732695,0.0075900275,0.0026623616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12719753,0.000742804,0.0011533068,0.0022725358,0.0016544107,0.00268897,0.003181198,0.0021399895,0.005197513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37943313,0.0007459004,0.0012154382,0.0020885018,0.0050167493,0.004189292,0.003451581,0.0027188938,0.0011140339],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010184141,0.003969161,0.7130673,0.0006266986,0.0022444236,0.0006558735,0.00872324,0.02234263,0.002003243,0.08699661,0.0057308967,0.14345586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034322725,0.015633851,0.3954774,0.0008281912,0.0016324368,0.0014720084,0.0056469925,0.23373003,0.011112422,0.30448484,0.026024764,0.0005247999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029660407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019377567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12719753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020197674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001620026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6726929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200051083","doi":"10.51868/8","title":"Micro-Directives and Computational Merger Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Process (computing); Ex-ante; Computer science; Data science; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Economics","score_opus":0.029997596183916383,"score_gpt":0.22673084980881886,"score_spread":0.19673325362490246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200051083","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124003194,0.0049802433,0.7443226,0.03083331,0.0005357182,0.00029968616,0.0016328313,0.001140417,0.09225207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8842234,0.0013474278,0.0999933,0.0010110664,0.0004097186,0.0002220625,0.0008155469,0.00014322442,0.011834324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99416107,0.003340872,0.0003506562,0.0010422462,0.00076019333,0.0003449779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96391,0.026857294,0.0040568635,0.0024209488,0.0019681356,0.0007867476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006800655,0.00045362458,0.0012149996,0.0024796522,0.0015337681,0.005342199,0.0022259017,0.0018500851,0.013589698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059041336,0.00060810347,0.00083762576,0.0028864203,0.0031735834,0.0060599195,0.00242222,0.0025057194,0.0012390988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011820293,0.00008198437,0.0065501328,0.00021698818,0.0001073471,0.00013134029,0.00032282862,0.18566091,0.0002050492,0.69801825,0.010124225,0.0984628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028818402,0.00001908049,0.0014111535,0.000051694893,0.000017691593,0.000056546778,0.00012125227,0.31257197,0.00025961953,0.6765732,0.008865217,0.000023745486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00919352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014123954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013589698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004115376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042179227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04546213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205749009","doi":"10.1257/aer.20200732","title":"A/B Contracts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Moral hazard; Status quo; Variety (cybernetics); Microeconomics; Relevance (law); Economics; Actuarial science; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.029790581405461702,"score_gpt":0.2448148216916275,"score_spread":0.2150242402861658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205749009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15587889,0.004063717,0.38660195,0.03262625,0.0009881417,0.0007572221,0.002456474,0.0004938874,0.4161334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95345265,0.0007411385,0.03311703,0.004663022,0.00059781125,0.000349263,0.00026817794,0.00004142294,0.006769404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9728591,0.014378416,0.0015520117,0.004002124,0.0058301296,0.001378295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8700731,0.0965964,0.012234684,0.011437177,0.0071872463,0.0024713527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026068337,0.00061828666,0.0014934152,0.0019426682,0.0022404427,0.0045190137,0.0020230513,0.005614587,0.019982379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11323822,0.000534447,0.00093669636,0.0017936486,0.0062945443,0.009103647,0.0023817068,0.005761454,0.0023668827],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013123882,0.00008816034,0.0024389129,0.00013683991,0.000032750468,0.00012653777,0.00021436137,0.0016303454,0.00032707627,0.96216226,0.0055815503,0.027129875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001607008,0.00023339856,0.0023962648,0.00017509225,0.000034701297,0.00025529228,0.00019150657,0.0114188865,0.00055115955,0.95787054,0.02666796,0.0000444587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020017836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012637483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026068337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002158653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004914116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13786423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206151576","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v23i3.4348","title":"The Cognitive Problem of the Behavioral Decision Theory Through Game Theory: Biases and Heuristics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Game theory; Process (computing); Context (archaeology); Rationality; Relevance (law); Computer science; Management science; Decision theory; Social heuristics; Psychology; Epistemology; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.03327103039373693,"score_gpt":0.23099243099385317,"score_spread":0.19772140060011623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206151576","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034663863,0.004785542,0.8451018,0.03603663,0.00043597544,0.00022673277,0.00020665291,0.00011206738,0.0784308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7765638,0.0044716503,0.21049204,0.0030161543,0.00053631765,0.0007102325,0.000097303564,0.00009300492,0.004019447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785129,0.015259437,0.0006548741,0.0013002448,0.003665551,0.0006070262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.961661,0.03260382,0.0016553968,0.002204542,0.0014187475,0.00045647594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023888197,0.0010025965,0.001763683,0.0030440702,0.001626192,0.0100717805,0.0031980416,0.0030835706,0.0028101692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042730663,0.00062532315,0.0013104049,0.002396644,0.026046576,0.014781664,0.0034241665,0.005656957,0.00047373353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000103472785,0.00001237242,0.00022070165,0.00008397958,0.000025462572,0.000020916896,0.00096165796,0.0022672077,0.000053751803,0.99165,0.00029410992,0.004399534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006711446,0.000008620428,0.000066512046,0.000037185546,0.0000052471864,0.000013734714,0.00019605827,0.0030653367,0.000047049005,0.994288,0.0022574028,0.000008092222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030899344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019416885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023888197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046847053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004973118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12633437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206629756","doi":"10.1108/978-1-80117-139-720211014","title":"Index","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Mathematics; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03379968070991147,"score_gpt":0.22018728625463793,"score_spread":0.18638760554472647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206629756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031413816,0.0032075571,0.0010537786,0.0053541097,0.017912561,0.00022739226,0.018473485,0.0020125895,0.9514443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014186768,0.0025216963,0.0008124178,0.0021514914,0.0021334866,0.00016366238,0.014564593,0.000885544,0.9753484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740356,0.00020093643,0.00023046992,0.0004894635,0.0014124835,0.00026305937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962366,0.00026237773,0.00013766771,0.0005308589,0.0023342601,0.00049828645],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014671435,0.0017448706,0.0013748726,0.0051051197,0.0026125594,0.012983213,0.0023673242,0.0035204764,0.7430212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073798327,0.000626378,0.0013042117,0.007783264,0.0010056663,0.008071385,0.0038791643,0.0029436215,0.78447384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009548165,0.000010366351,0.00010715359,0.00014366918,0.0000024122578,0.000017351284,0.00002927157,0.00002322627,0.000074427975,0.0042739334,0.94776076,0.04754781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020710297,0.00000429221,0.00017832803,0.000079625774,0.0000010798001,0.000022470173,0.000028241433,0.000016066459,0.00003216988,0.0007345289,0.99889696,0.000004058493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010165589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009696075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2569788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031020953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048469524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210983167","doi":"10.1017/9781108594981.002","title":"Reasonable Royalties","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.028494635685378637,"score_gpt":0.16931352590642623,"score_spread":0.1408188902210476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210983167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005262058,0.00782087,0.2122869,0.009616225,0.0016079025,0.00021278231,0.00063031015,0.00054667477,0.76201636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51856387,0.015185293,0.21856591,0.009524164,0.0033564242,0.0011144755,0.0015146028,0.0014960752,0.23067915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783951,0.004915003,0.0012311472,0.0019074292,0.012845939,0.0007053364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805979,0.011624127,0.0011699073,0.0027385955,0.003492573,0.00037691384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010769678,0.0011722601,0.0010661113,0.0043756547,0.0029307574,0.011611357,0.0038361645,0.003304933,0.026725229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06777849,0.0007184596,0.0014705424,0.0025289562,0.008032352,0.011168337,0.0030798626,0.006319815,0.00896338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065730783,0.000009731543,0.00013706821,0.000059993516,0.000006554537,0.000035416262,0.00014201012,0.0008293067,0.00006226006,0.96802247,0.011601117,0.019087415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005731189,0.000029879251,0.0004752918,0.00046560034,0.000014535484,0.0003296487,0.00016960164,0.0027587952,0.0004629416,0.8282786,0.16696721,0.000042118063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028469423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029842374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026725229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052807606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051367446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08940482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212910398","doi":"10.3386/w10978","title":"Theft and Taxes","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.3598286986798433,"score_gpt":0.44568031337214986,"score_spread":0.08585161469230657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212910398","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35797793,0.022421412,0.015908448,0.03437702,0.00036352174,0.000050569415,0.00035040092,0.000063544445,0.5684871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693768,0.0050313408,0.00038364955,0.00092227483,0.00026813737,0.000009271188,0.000051570674,0.00001759381,0.023939408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918574,0.00023332385,0.00003027819,0.00010531906,0.00020640716,0.00023895265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967687,0.0016429225,0.00093868555,0.00027499674,0.00023600203,0.00013871555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008004767,0.00016918943,0.0004863625,0.00071668846,0.0010270121,0.0027958627,0.00030907357,0.0011284014,0.0104622515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005551628,0.0001431206,0.00038559406,0.0013625784,0.0030848298,0.0027074935,0.0010957198,0.0020465555,0.0004956085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003740376,0.000045127566,0.006238733,0.00004127516,0.000017216305,0.0001273839,0.00022772397,0.001897869,0.00010162529,0.9728482,0.0031582545,0.015259198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029013649,0.000047584213,0.010644483,0.00013969808,0.000030325014,0.00025290577,0.00037083673,0.0022895557,0.00043696826,0.93609357,0.04965014,0.000015001407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053542024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004855749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0104622515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022327343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011649877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03499973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214576386","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1t4m1m6.9","title":"Pandemic Pop-Ups and the Performance of Legality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Bristol University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"NSW Department of Planning,Industry and Environment","keywords":"Principle of legality; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.03509356308316482,"score_gpt":0.17415714521465128,"score_spread":0.13906358213148645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214576386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023682661,0.0024781076,0.00095575873,0.016855037,0.00026092248,0.000019567675,0.000034494577,0.000026523709,0.9556869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.808152,0.002757303,0.00057181367,0.0033907897,0.00031449425,0.000040329265,0.000050261282,0.00005990207,0.18466315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976647,0.00084967836,0.00004008526,0.00020718371,0.00053242093,0.00070594886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724907,0.0011165724,0.00028126084,0.00031527126,0.0005930348,0.00044477716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029720624,0.00022425296,0.0002377343,0.0008800413,0.0076629473,0.008166234,0.0008990492,0.002398591,0.011463176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008048489,0.00028375373,0.00021275382,0.0009511658,0.024862615,0.0054335333,0.004140408,0.0043816376,0.001066481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038246967,0.000008597684,0.00033626406,0.000009814904,0.0000012834633,0.00006918162,0.004422766,0.00015373724,0.000036071517,0.97692466,0.012327491,0.0057062767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015460157,0.0000364426,0.0049476866,0.00026009718,0.0000071544837,0.00023011578,0.0100337,0.00085063593,0.00030322635,0.4405748,0.5426998,0.000040759445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036896836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057083223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036896836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010339262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008431411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075016916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226299566","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4029114","title":"The Winners and Losers of Rental Tribunals","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Renting; Political science; Economics; Demographic economics; Law","score_opus":0.011851191734655375,"score_gpt":0.19756988975119594,"score_spread":0.18571869801654056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226299566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87058294,0.0016549197,0.00060431776,0.0117947785,0.00029598697,0.000044498825,0.00015618585,0.000023400913,0.114843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858726,0.00021104276,0.000063778185,0.00043694268,0.00009254351,0.000007925723,0.00003847302,0.00001528583,0.013261444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933696,0.0021189163,0.00017112661,0.00054098025,0.0012479544,0.0025515256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99379563,0.0016002149,0.0009558363,0.00048226703,0.00096733676,0.002198779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043843486,0.00019364178,0.00090306293,0.0017060142,0.006361065,0.0095051015,0.0011599389,0.0018975477,0.011783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025750391,0.00034246987,0.00026906503,0.0013445837,0.004814025,0.0046054237,0.003922315,0.0028514576,0.0019605695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013536062,0.0006133946,0.19516227,0.00013525209,0.00017527392,0.0021321715,0.043204688,0.0010904053,0.0012366304,0.50326765,0.106806785,0.14482187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016897958,0.00060640805,0.39405054,0.00030113754,0.00021533568,0.0012712973,0.24716786,0.006650272,0.0011963007,0.20497642,0.1431973,0.00019818476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011136754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029036246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021490352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018703938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0394181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229616329","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.197","title":"THE FRENCH RESPONSE TO THE WORLD BANK'S <i>DOING BUSINESS</i> REPORTS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Civil law (Civil law); Law; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Resistance (ecology); Comparative law; Legal realism; Sociocultural evolution; Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Commercial law","score_opus":0.009359559792998856,"score_gpt":0.17810038901662656,"score_spread":0.1687408292236277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229616329","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004636439,0.009064908,0.00033719107,0.94699216,0.007860249,0.000023182107,0.00060498744,0.00013108169,0.03034977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11208158,0.010087498,0.0012772306,0.77947706,0.014982936,0.00014431041,0.00078581297,0.00031447047,0.08084912],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98077786,0.0054920968,0.000894903,0.0012545947,0.008212957,0.0033675772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595337,0.019717963,0.0050790533,0.0010690964,0.012143739,0.0024564539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016486412,0.0014424297,0.00080651126,0.0035465423,0.009870446,0.017231671,0.0021241524,0.022718005,0.0071887425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04139099,0.00085972226,0.0012890857,0.004014827,0.0064662,0.004003119,0.0029153635,0.012241333,0.001671709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051756117,0.000013588271,0.0013262668,0.00012628229,0.000023837723,0.0005460515,0.0021224085,0.00014962394,0.00026378568,0.04082249,0.94805235,0.006501473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001690203,0.000023946684,0.005089096,0.00020813607,0.000017985889,0.00013576857,0.0020514533,0.00015747205,0.0003562862,0.0016326422,0.99023974,0.000070571085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36391875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2344159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36391875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026682695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020402491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.723601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230258616","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14638116.v1","title":"Unmixing the mixed questions: a framework for distinguishing between questions of fact and questions of law in contractual interpretation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Judicial deference; Political science; Appeal; Common law; Criticism; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04774219242103839,"score_gpt":0.2849374752109805,"score_spread":0.23719528278994212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230258616","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01775125,0.013173489,0.83596295,0.033611346,0.0006511271,0.0007025807,0.00016249636,0.00008677166,0.097897954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59238356,0.0040870695,0.3873548,0.0058682137,0.0010658088,0.0020259647,0.00019433658,0.00013485072,0.006885446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8790107,0.09871541,0.004369707,0.0059414045,0.008963407,0.0029994175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9191783,0.066142924,0.0050545037,0.004017979,0.004284624,0.0013216885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.102844715,0.0020782533,0.0019411693,0.017617473,0.013415273,0.024798702,0.0076995483,0.012852484,0.004319234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081096575,0.0022295974,0.002918825,0.009056213,0.11329837,0.05558048,0.015780153,0.012076968,0.0006785102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069937423,0.0000051469374,0.00020012468,0.00003022053,0.0000046842797,0.000057109934,0.0056210104,0.00012531785,0.00003136058,0.9900422,0.00019111588,0.0036846388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009635592,0.000012993809,0.0002219655,0.00014709916,0.00000942415,0.00008071538,0.0021583012,0.0012961302,0.00008279348,0.9849267,0.011033132,0.000021153885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014144904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013698115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102844715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017868852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016017757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5439013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232083333","doi":"10.31124/advance.12401969","title":"Logic, Probability Theory, and their Application to Legal Reasoning","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Correctness; Computer science; Probabilistic logic network; Probability theory; Subjective logic; Epistemic modal logic; Probabilistic argumentation; Philosophy of logic; Applied probability; Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Multimodal logic; Mathematics; Algorithm; Autoepistemic logic; Description logic; Probabilistic logic; Programming language","score_opus":0.036046425259085434,"score_gpt":0.22770784667472235,"score_spread":0.1916614214156369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232083333","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016179087,0.042411286,0.7001468,0.051600747,0.001333164,0.00013819172,0.0003356047,0.00030033002,0.18755478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7122989,0.027528036,0.22998834,0.0051804683,0.005570875,0.00038525756,0.00030536574,0.00017553734,0.018567206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918405,0.004712459,0.0004423953,0.0008263212,0.0018135128,0.00036472647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831549,0.0139096,0.00088919065,0.0005992063,0.0011006679,0.00034639306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008755712,0.0008100854,0.0010289737,0.0050874264,0.0031911114,0.009086137,0.0017685875,0.0037824828,0.004934833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02240611,0.0006872343,0.0017186498,0.003527164,0.021680856,0.010589377,0.003685989,0.005417236,0.00083377317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028037139,0.0000044980634,0.0000716939,0.000026072783,0.000005772401,0.000033022483,0.0001180978,0.0012190776,0.000024322379,0.99473,0.0006129393,0.0031516827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000223362,0.0000014306324,0.000034840945,0.00001993749,0.0000016550756,0.000014806961,0.000023334576,0.0019414943,0.0000187495,0.9953434,0.0025942926,0.0000038734493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006425304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023808368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009086137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006438871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034876163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046717465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232124707","doi":"10.1890/09-0204","title":"CONSUMER-BASED LIMITATIONS DRIVE OAK RECRUITMENT FAILURE","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Geography; Environmental science; Biology","score_opus":0.08287168522478132,"score_gpt":0.25090203490819846,"score_spread":0.16803034968341712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232124707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993544,0.000018594883,0.000045525696,0.000020086047,5.8126545e-7,0.000001994001,0.000006189956,9.821047e-7,0.0005515328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99976104,0.000018430857,0.00004848328,0.000012599225,0.0000012659946,0.0000018265667,0.000011312596,4.0666447e-7,0.00014461631],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999813,0.00007468596,0.000014760352,0.000026059373,0.00003242458,0.000039011637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773777,0.0006076353,0.0010349121,0.00012210973,0.000093546245,0.00040399242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089365634,0.00011825746,0.00019318792,0.0001635868,0.00032369778,0.00047783586,0.00017853259,0.00029125146,0.0018337405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020840277,0.00011738977,0.00010124418,0.00008374028,0.0005194829,0.0002519243,0.00037223968,0.00031769168,0.00012411537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044773298,0.00053729955,0.96976376,0.000029877529,0.000023038803,0.0003960053,0.00039059395,0.00096154853,0.016096145,0.0011104983,0.0003077755,0.009935712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021576425,0.00028225587,0.9950718,0.000005839109,0.000009290983,0.00022715481,0.0003683119,0.0021143842,0.00052953523,0.0010646,0.00029934093,0.0000059192457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002707061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009274702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002707061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033840645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028780245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0061344504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233070569","doi":"10.1092/r5qc-7eec-empv-ujle","title":"Discussion of \"Private Predecision Information, Performance Measure Congruity, and the Value of Delegation\"","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delegation; Measure (data warehouse); Value (mathematics); Business; Economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Management; Statistics; Data mining","score_opus":0.049069419448549395,"score_gpt":0.26780505924635195,"score_spread":0.21873563979780256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233070569","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088575155,0.009879484,0.17509048,0.36785486,0.0015979524,0.00013293153,0.00039354654,0.00017825376,0.3562973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96574056,0.0020011913,0.011094,0.011433985,0.002307836,0.00011483203,0.000044356933,0.000039145118,0.007224141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919659,0.0042751404,0.00031446532,0.00091147807,0.0019293673,0.00060364825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9447355,0.04557691,0.004310325,0.0028282497,0.0019163559,0.0006326195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015612288,0.00056566426,0.00092478323,0.0015432457,0.0035344802,0.008458771,0.003759135,0.009833853,0.012244942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053373147,0.0005207269,0.0011167779,0.002711325,0.014858671,0.011117205,0.0031772058,0.006674572,0.0005679503],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015547621,0.000012424025,0.00023449323,0.000018570234,0.000009390291,0.00003544893,0.00031600316,0.0005896942,0.000051882966,0.9933531,0.0019053278,0.0034580564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017096158,0.000016894983,0.00075554795,0.00006986939,0.000023331226,0.00004382196,0.00028338318,0.0022453906,0.00025312995,0.9848018,0.011475701,0.0000140745215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018861352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024732735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015612288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034848417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002896906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08256668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233079707","doi":"10.4337/9781788118262.00020","title":"Extra-contractual civil liability","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Institution; Harm; Externality; Damages; Legal liability; Business; Actuarial science; Strict liability; Compensation (psychology); Law and economics; Accident (philosophy); Economics; Law; Political science; Finance; Microeconomics; Psychology","score_opus":0.03646756164678484,"score_gpt":0.20413407879256393,"score_spread":0.16766651714577907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233079707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019993313,0.0064554904,0.10231403,0.013076072,0.0016116324,0.00017198763,0.0006073169,0.00023713137,0.855533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83064467,0.0049857236,0.030192545,0.010474347,0.002040649,0.00051809335,0.0007310484,0.00018950987,0.12022339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909174,0.0026015542,0.00080990884,0.0012165861,0.0032715055,0.0011831445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99224126,0.0026399207,0.0010068924,0.0018024589,0.0019234573,0.00038604942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004763342,0.0006767217,0.00042906037,0.0019812144,0.0025962465,0.0053129485,0.0021308945,0.0044592745,0.012157457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009814756,0.00041404762,0.0009082209,0.0016796987,0.012903844,0.00589976,0.0034778954,0.005706876,0.0026151265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003910013,0.000007521267,0.00012280063,0.000025690897,0.00000272896,0.000075921045,0.00022161654,0.00014383449,0.000043339194,0.9933895,0.0027299065,0.00323317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016043314,0.000041870826,0.0015073342,0.00026152804,0.000013316063,0.0010467399,0.00035717594,0.0018928766,0.00036172153,0.6824353,0.312032,0.000033987773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069639967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004290666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012157457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039333724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003074357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040670812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233265654","doi":"10.2190/sopc4","title":"Old Lessons for New Governance: Safety or Profit and the New Conventional Wisdom","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Profit (economics); Industrial organization; Economics; Finance; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.047039074483056775,"score_gpt":0.22583029391992143,"score_spread":0.17879121943686466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233265654","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022539815,0.023668608,0.034032196,0.7499975,0.002024686,0.000040293897,0.0000790528,0.000084971245,0.16753297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8932945,0.016718537,0.0065155234,0.05693637,0.0037061737,0.00011236094,0.000060271555,0.000093488234,0.022562748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910439,0.003662696,0.0002714925,0.0014530491,0.002645451,0.000923472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855575,0.007642582,0.0011779855,0.0021839775,0.0018815207,0.0015564766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013177424,0.0004662079,0.0008271833,0.0014977924,0.0057155136,0.012769156,0.0018276557,0.0058506234,0.002409307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010897664,0.00037251,0.000658006,0.0012336757,0.087986656,0.016896907,0.004752763,0.010661662,0.0005913157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000565595,0.000009660234,0.00027871798,0.0000364096,0.0000035014086,0.000023874036,0.0017588652,0.00018172382,0.000031033585,0.98692024,0.005367977,0.005382387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009158293,0.000010463848,0.00038775936,0.00017755567,0.0000027517883,0.00002066638,0.0019771098,0.00038934386,0.000058130685,0.9234056,0.07354939,0.000012048433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015674327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016140457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015674327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014305335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011333448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103792965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235948226","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3804995","title":"Introduction to Law and Economics for Civil Law Systems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Comparative law; Commercial law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.012385235313786335,"score_gpt":0.1977230987378657,"score_spread":0.18533786342407937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235948226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003343253,0.17427814,0.13856837,0.15163814,0.018719971,0.00018095408,0.0034896082,0.0008230184,0.50895846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15965277,0.16428685,0.08910183,0.044936407,0.06959866,0.0008369021,0.0018950315,0.0009478687,0.46874362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994797,0.00021160515,0.00003147012,0.00007454765,0.00015323955,0.00004945471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761355,0.0018101099,0.000086782005,0.0001489374,0.00022973341,0.00011084037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010924164,0.00094501517,0.0008805769,0.002106565,0.0011536386,0.0035688912,0.0011094274,0.0039385036,0.040138885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030982927,0.0006485355,0.0009073984,0.002547584,0.0033953714,0.0053640287,0.0011936409,0.0057767425,0.007183527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052187906,0.000028521757,0.00015884661,0.000089612346,0.0000067591,0.000040702693,0.00009335902,0.0007348762,0.00005612404,0.85195744,0.12704524,0.01978326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074623035,0.000008683801,0.00045781693,0.00016031462,0.000003872917,0.000067151836,0.000053057116,0.0008276577,0.000027067621,0.6589743,0.33940083,0.000011827224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046639517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00461577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040138885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025651276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016200893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13427788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236039286","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2201168","title":"Lie to Us: Why Companies are Cheating in Form 8-K and Press Releases Announcing Restatement","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02301381162689459,"score_gpt":0.21461723482039377,"score_spread":0.19160342319349918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236039286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45568934,0.0022197003,0.0040768213,0.18314284,0.00086755765,0.000118109805,0.00035040313,0.0005188676,0.35301635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96268255,0.0002667241,0.0003296318,0.0143289,0.0002810837,0.000021855016,0.00007424751,0.00013551496,0.021879572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99239665,0.0022221778,0.00037228037,0.0008957252,0.0022225678,0.0018905569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95353967,0.021091737,0.0103409635,0.0044217906,0.0067969984,0.003808911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058313957,0.00026059756,0.000401053,0.0016277876,0.00616153,0.010359839,0.0011694613,0.011166899,0.023934282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056478925,0.00039829605,0.0004832349,0.0013554352,0.00601859,0.0066336584,0.0033864505,0.007956731,0.0050880183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006561704,0.00041889068,0.16444537,0.00025891315,0.00016010013,0.0044474485,0.05218767,0.00064047286,0.0027218836,0.37182215,0.30783582,0.094405055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020492196,0.0004197458,0.22593239,0.000907877,0.00028269063,0.003499315,0.08604165,0.0050344765,0.004322369,0.19200812,0.48086736,0.00047900053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014438514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017004292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023934282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029008384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029096499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08006811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236780936","doi":"10.1090/dol/028/03","title":"Section 2. From The Contest Problem Book VI","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"American Mathematical Society eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Section (typography); History; Computer science; Philosophy; Theology; Operating system","score_opus":0.022881508701432015,"score_gpt":0.20124056413677816,"score_spread":0.17835905543534614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236780936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001233924,0.008283032,0.013851526,0.014601671,0.0029162667,0.000048956135,0.0009313933,0.00013372641,0.9579994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03501323,0.007798732,0.006690882,0.004891528,0.0037510265,0.00016406871,0.0019197087,0.00042298785,0.9393477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956876,0.00010157617,0.00002095845,0.00007607181,0.00018220561,0.000050372215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949646,0.00025164694,0.000029247387,0.000066974375,0.0001104208,0.000045305198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049063965,0.00067649723,0.00049367535,0.00091647607,0.0014346445,0.0029652794,0.0008424922,0.0016009803,0.16982195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022705593,0.0003214828,0.0005044597,0.0011396859,0.0011116052,0.003708098,0.0012511339,0.0031888299,0.043465123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011411985,0.000025940226,0.000062868006,0.0001137865,0.0000036296608,0.000037132435,0.000087686814,0.0004228373,0.00010660808,0.55046767,0.41091558,0.037744835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051834304,0.000006831377,0.00014288093,0.00011805604,0.0000023763612,0.00009977312,0.00005009937,0.00037591124,0.00012019888,0.3607587,0.6383137,0.0000062966733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023437089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033173617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16982195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019329711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013138634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.568111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237555607","doi":"10.3138/utlj.60.2.155","title":"MICHAEL TREBILCOCK AND THE PAST AND FUTURE OF LAW AND ECONOMICS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Scholarship; Coase theorem; Law; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Transaction cost; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007666033138728695,"score_gpt":0.16043229367241765,"score_spread":0.15276626053368897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237555607","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027315158,0.248973,0.002760435,0.61764044,0.0043063755,0.000008269122,0.000041049338,0.000039136055,0.123499736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46076736,0.2012886,0.0075885714,0.15897822,0.032974288,0.00010525755,0.00007060305,0.00012649833,0.13810062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723816,0.0013760459,0.00007782617,0.00037132044,0.00068715704,0.00024946206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956311,0.0027253323,0.00031059762,0.00026338518,0.000615037,0.00045457302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034769038,0.00040248965,0.00045304187,0.0015159062,0.004544543,0.0104941055,0.0010756274,0.0051055336,0.0054408954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007205212,0.0003129844,0.00026925854,0.0018806199,0.020998748,0.009767397,0.0017617038,0.0070268945,0.0009309935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008888368,0.0000053693643,0.00007017884,0.000029555958,0.0000023471603,0.000034316163,0.00081578345,0.000066591725,0.000020653742,0.9400269,0.051848058,0.007071476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005080905,0.0000069160883,0.00028541576,0.00020347958,0.000002220411,0.000078298464,0.00069852086,0.00019012281,0.00004155657,0.45085967,0.5476154,0.000013398125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03019603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042964775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.969804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010738581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065687383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07791424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238454917","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.1.fernandez","title":"FUZZY RULES AND CLEAR ENOUGH STANDARDS: THE USES AND ABUSES OF <i>PIERSON V POST</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Law; Style (visual arts); Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Literature; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.014220824814434626,"score_gpt":0.18470277522737175,"score_spread":0.17048195041293712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238454917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11328687,0.017696533,0.020864507,0.2987941,0.0009130131,0.000035600635,0.00007314473,0.000057871184,0.54827833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96685934,0.0022816735,0.0018815587,0.015090415,0.00026416645,0.000041958632,0.0000127793655,0.00003457089,0.013533379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917258,0.004207887,0.00027044804,0.0009708596,0.0022023995,0.00062253495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921708,0.0056982604,0.000498766,0.00060538494,0.0008141184,0.00021260155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008174039,0.00025020394,0.00033679963,0.0009962782,0.0075082183,0.008981043,0.00092610816,0.0054666246,0.0013657028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016456995,0.00040380785,0.00027558452,0.0013131609,0.04652948,0.010534637,0.0038139303,0.0073475027,0.00017764703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004149363,0.0000022113652,0.00012952759,0.000008224324,0.0000012295827,0.00003189479,0.0047212923,0.000016674177,0.000021144555,0.98935086,0.0030821958,0.0026306193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020242987,0.0000338479,0.0014688319,0.00029276067,0.000017284752,0.00020843396,0.010999842,0.0006670854,0.0006229981,0.7859375,0.19968863,0.000042568383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04412173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047762267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95587826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00918206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056496956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08772987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239514426","doi":"10.1163/9789460910104_008","title":"Perspectives in Equity","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06783384658620098,"score_gpt":0.24540958459591955,"score_spread":0.17757573800971857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239514426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002678191,0.033282425,0.003820267,0.03411987,0.0010125873,0.000012660202,0.000080084865,0.000019015257,0.924975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3260508,0.035472125,0.0035416812,0.021546835,0.007754971,0.0000986924,0.00015870505,0.00009962452,0.6052765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991412,0.00034689353,0.000013755815,0.00013676737,0.00026502047,0.00009640321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992698,0.00045607946,0.000037098893,0.00005656091,0.000117350035,0.000063225896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013288764,0.00045850605,0.00035625347,0.000993019,0.0019290193,0.004928505,0.00069305074,0.0025380189,0.014293485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025851387,0.00015385919,0.0002093746,0.0012141694,0.007333775,0.0040877843,0.0010085348,0.0042314953,0.0014175052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011115465,0.000002700356,0.000025150468,0.0000034045997,3.408815e-7,0.0000042541146,0.00007886059,0.000028677276,0.0000067600286,0.98802024,0.009402397,0.002426122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003010949,0.0000040882296,0.00019595964,0.000061052255,0.0000010400016,0.000018861949,0.0001852902,0.0001690717,0.00003091718,0.80251074,0.19681792,0.0000020294506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066205086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075319516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014293485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003393487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019036914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047816515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240652404","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1593551","title":"Guilty Until Proven Innocent: The Economic Consequences of the Initiation and the Outcome of Internal Investigations of Option Backdating","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.022169394663101364,"score_gpt":0.23005816692687517,"score_spread":0.2078887722637738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240652404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84875596,0.0018307015,0.0064697224,0.022278769,0.0002011283,0.00015340325,0.0006117374,0.0001279607,0.11957064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99594694,0.0004086907,0.00043994258,0.0004992925,0.00015816002,0.00003472059,0.0000791386,0.000019770898,0.0024133632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.992355,0.0036680733,0.00035248496,0.00060861,0.0011219002,0.0018938322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7752906,0.17709677,0.025924489,0.007321908,0.006976433,0.00738973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022121869,0.00033990998,0.0011689662,0.0021596004,0.003423763,0.0105225155,0.0023551167,0.008878137,0.014296709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14880395,0.0006473183,0.00082093553,0.00198992,0.0066598216,0.008597906,0.003936787,0.010936208,0.0010559261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0072979038,0.0022751098,0.14567527,0.00021412493,0.00038733523,0.004850726,0.0031086255,0.01938808,0.0014222699,0.73323256,0.021660376,0.060487587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062895386,0.00061931624,0.08148743,0.0003017657,0.00039821133,0.0008720917,0.0046012136,0.047160346,0.0023549844,0.85224044,0.009063956,0.0002712974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005745203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006372169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022121869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003622403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046576867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11699301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242007205","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3324837","title":"Contractual Interpretation, Registered Documents and Third Party Effects","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Information retrieval; Business; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009210243416289943,"score_gpt":0.21164529040120397,"score_spread":0.20243504698491402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242007205","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39576355,0.00983409,0.052772567,0.02042138,0.00052979594,0.0002680743,0.0009865526,0.00023147908,0.5191925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97486067,0.0019028909,0.002689786,0.0008344155,0.0003472248,0.000067950714,0.00016625198,0.00009523513,0.019035434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860837,0.0066426517,0.00093493535,0.001106886,0.0036683439,0.0015634757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.885388,0.088169746,0.012098546,0.00854845,0.0045276377,0.0012675395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013954674,0.00059570814,0.0017267304,0.0028642318,0.003282841,0.013305584,0.002181613,0.0056540184,0.049724557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072768874,0.00066023855,0.0014963896,0.004755446,0.010193917,0.010580637,0.0030153764,0.006468792,0.002361236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001950855,0.00022032503,0.003561746,0.00011313889,0.0000488012,0.00021385777,0.001073643,0.0015434498,0.00023679573,0.9800541,0.002961442,0.009777751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017482536,0.00011924134,0.008170428,0.00016720431,0.00012544804,0.00016700002,0.0011646206,0.0047603627,0.00048386905,0.9746054,0.01001153,0.00005009609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010812138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009130282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049724557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00455235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055371914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16634518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242275342","doi":"10.4992/pacjpa.70.0_sl05","title":"UNCERTAINTY REGULATION: THE MASTER MOTIVE ?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.025136831399158576,"score_gpt":0.2275568478677768,"score_spread":0.20242001646861824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242275342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15112124,0.00796917,0.21076559,0.30137062,0.0031057252,0.00017930701,0.00075416267,0.00068039616,0.32405376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97355926,0.0011454326,0.005637869,0.006902228,0.0017416575,0.000094286814,0.000068172456,0.00013379929,0.010717268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968177,0.0009184257,0.00014122913,0.0009632222,0.0006440669,0.00051537633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876024,0.0059569296,0.0021519377,0.0018274974,0.0013398401,0.0011214562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009084316,0.00051800517,0.0013333211,0.0010320928,0.0015954025,0.007569794,0.001608001,0.005656477,0.018792482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025247358,0.0005411833,0.00086097285,0.0007554592,0.010196799,0.014336383,0.002674851,0.005067448,0.0020674958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006940157,0.0000840994,0.0016904218,0.00007127941,0.000049315317,0.000045949306,0.0007195081,0.0008609862,0.0004584004,0.97742826,0.005855987,0.012666327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004314339,0.000029266539,0.0013879722,0.00004976469,0.00002590642,0.000038032864,0.0003181733,0.003391787,0.00045479872,0.98437655,0.009853974,0.000030668467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014742806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012796919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018792482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022025923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036207307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062867105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242321384","doi":"10.1092/v1tu-aw8j-5fya-glpw","title":"Private Predecision Information, Performance Measure Congruity, and the Value of Delegation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delegation; Measure (data warehouse); Business; Value (mathematics); Business administration; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Management; Data mining","score_opus":0.0545859173536945,"score_gpt":0.26674953656434924,"score_spread":0.21216361921065474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242321384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86029696,0.0027726437,0.04135958,0.007807913,0.000112054455,0.000045625355,0.00018279266,0.00009154057,0.08733072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982255,0.00015087075,0.00083767186,0.0000700336,0.00006633399,0.000006094721,0.00001808624,0.000010208625,0.00061538507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99240315,0.004186108,0.00043831323,0.00086360995,0.0013445157,0.00076428533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80584455,0.14645089,0.022117134,0.01700053,0.0050916485,0.003495165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018985149,0.000362916,0.0010310187,0.0018280422,0.00160279,0.0069022723,0.0009894464,0.002425985,0.007611425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14928795,0.00046730865,0.00045269672,0.0020244932,0.0056056916,0.009608336,0.0029750636,0.002702515,0.00045014027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023705477,0.00065624143,0.07192029,0.00028159554,0.00028241338,0.00045539302,0.00429805,0.024784038,0.0014212276,0.7706013,0.0028013615,0.12012757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095905016,0.00017509305,0.027970493,0.000061404266,0.00010545367,0.00021505062,0.0009509486,0.016667375,0.00086042396,0.9501578,0.0026870077,0.000052999756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009868484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009771273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018985149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021243242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014875124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10040426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243020238","doi":"10.1017/9781316459423.003","title":"Profit Maximization and Control Rights","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Profit maximization; Maximization; Control (management); Profit (economics); Business; Microeconomics; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.021500107122845814,"score_gpt":0.16603992379615015,"score_spread":0.14453981667330434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243020238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017058639,0.016101211,0.037569255,0.012120255,0.0002897411,0.000034522727,0.00014887835,0.000060650324,0.91661674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8173148,0.007746944,0.0058936463,0.0015903544,0.001156081,0.00015603463,0.00015674545,0.000081926475,0.16590334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986469,0.00046561766,0.00004631763,0.00028177488,0.00033059076,0.00022875215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991773,0.00045006082,0.00007261407,0.00014332081,0.00009309483,0.00006355761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016972069,0.0007350368,0.0007250465,0.00066229055,0.0013193357,0.0054651937,0.0007922028,0.0029238989,0.014033813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034141627,0.00031101704,0.00039590322,0.0008493557,0.008312166,0.0047617215,0.0014456152,0.0035341897,0.0017710245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034881648,0.000005739932,0.000016446036,0.0000068918607,0.000001709301,0.0000074957843,0.00003707582,0.00029016082,0.000045353994,0.9957202,0.0014030491,0.0024624174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036320596,0.0000022589381,0.00005973336,0.00001453087,0.0000014056731,0.000008691935,0.000017003658,0.0005235054,0.00004359172,0.99319917,0.0061242753,0.0000021703702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022141752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016865283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014033813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029277923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017463572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046947837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243354234","doi":"10.1090/dol/028/11","title":"Section 10. From The Contest Problem Book V","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"American Mathematical Society eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Section (typography); History; Computer science; Political science; Law; Operating system","score_opus":0.023819408452273278,"score_gpt":0.20098811135534825,"score_spread":0.17716870290307496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243354234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007162078,0.0049708984,0.007892228,0.0121166315,0.002103668,0.00004476655,0.0008980071,0.000117192154,0.97114044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025172414,0.005131987,0.0039750994,0.005324329,0.0029164886,0.00015816628,0.0017421294,0.00032585757,0.9552536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994574,0.00011892959,0.000027100923,0.00009034339,0.00023422121,0.00007205895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933714,0.00031216224,0.000036204423,0.00008603886,0.00017232989,0.00005604104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057951093,0.0006651319,0.0005365648,0.00091888104,0.0016369948,0.003251184,0.0010048054,0.0019631763,0.20860612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002774945,0.00033057257,0.00053842086,0.00112439,0.0011315623,0.0038168267,0.0013007654,0.003506008,0.055506337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010518504,0.000023369905,0.000050668394,0.00009332294,0.0000036263302,0.000025494392,0.000055415327,0.00029691163,0.000076978606,0.45719504,0.513002,0.029166697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006590551,0.000006527163,0.0001481676,0.000119315504,0.0000025266684,0.000077697936,0.00004446652,0.0003265945,0.000117122065,0.3198251,0.679319,0.000006835257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039643594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005713866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20860612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026027397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018107012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.697857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243634922","doi":"10.1002/9781118785317.weom020013","title":"Executive Compensation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Wiley Encyclopedia of Management","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Meaning (existential); Executive compensation; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Business; Computer science; Social psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.020909533561237908,"score_gpt":0.21284215154147554,"score_spread":0.19193261798023764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243634922","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001297299,0.004280889,0.0010033407,0.0099207135,0.0011588803,0.000040699288,0.00030354786,0.00010225127,0.98189235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052041184,0.0040964293,0.0008448031,0.006005948,0.001012192,0.00005632942,0.000624806,0.00006674678,0.9352516],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949758,0.000895508,0.0002911917,0.0005130302,0.0027055568,0.00061893347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99593145,0.00075638015,0.00029979047,0.00041306112,0.0021852518,0.00041406805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028721238,0.00054653344,0.00038423878,0.0023512365,0.0027642497,0.006489496,0.0010881564,0.0031685156,0.13749109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010953061,0.00022788398,0.00035626892,0.002126194,0.001278942,0.0019957,0.002030987,0.002658349,0.045066297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019337791,0.000033772212,0.0009849463,0.00012446701,0.000005573614,0.00012309321,0.00026389415,0.00027865797,0.00015336799,0.40613213,0.48325014,0.1086305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034748462,0.000009049204,0.0008148429,0.00023314313,0.0000019630186,0.000090249225,0.000104885,0.000116412644,0.00012402775,0.011264426,0.9872318,0.0000057849434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062856656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007433149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13749109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034235516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058894297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45995355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245393113","doi":"10.33423/ajm.v18i3.76","title":"Making Sense of Time Value of Money and Agency Considerations in Structuring Legal Settlements in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Management","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Punitive damages; Damages; Human settlement; Structuring; Agency (philosophy); Business; Law; Value (mathematics); Settlement (finance); Law and economics; Common law; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Finance; Geography; Payment","score_opus":0.01794245477112704,"score_gpt":0.21980425396667036,"score_spread":0.2018617991955433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245393113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65586066,0.0033051502,0.022146445,0.020361092,0.00013380805,0.0002551208,0.00028936198,0.00007640034,0.297572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99121815,0.00035786987,0.0023734993,0.00015998201,0.000013792909,0.000014729094,0.000025227759,0.000009486402,0.005827295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949051,0.0010696072,0.0002339848,0.0005497251,0.001356124,0.001885467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99316484,0.0025209235,0.00088533055,0.00030820767,0.0017507726,0.0013698662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046410947,0.00027624267,0.00049610686,0.002656898,0.011781139,0.015278904,0.0025452261,0.0024561535,0.008366936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028830772,0.0004108826,0.00052671676,0.0029739637,0.00974136,0.004370618,0.0044893627,0.0020629389,0.00023630721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001469224,0.00006845504,0.020921279,0.00006995255,0.000053936237,0.00078898424,0.009262581,0.01576593,0.0005924282,0.89755017,0.0053093126,0.049470022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023478459,0.00017283406,0.10354806,0.0006368828,0.00037102943,0.00067414844,0.0872628,0.09335767,0.0024420545,0.53297687,0.1779536,0.0003692426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95064324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97590363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09343449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09343449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07816269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67791784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247564568","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1733","title":"Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Social desirability; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05282062610131946,"score_gpt":0.2056438236661601,"score_spread":0.15282319756484064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247564568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066237855,0.0038457613,0.036543883,0.02414185,0.00065760064,0.00011234305,0.00031401767,0.00009075113,0.92767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65866965,0.004816797,0.026075019,0.008301515,0.0016900054,0.00070935243,0.00021666897,0.00034155184,0.2991794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487066,0.0015628547,0.0002269303,0.0013981777,0.0014700043,0.0004713864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914607,0.004023181,0.000426146,0.0017971231,0.001945859,0.00034687348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064335866,0.0009223041,0.0011926964,0.001988938,0.0047948007,0.007698404,0.0014800162,0.0053239167,0.03352202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028252749,0.00051966636,0.00080073765,0.0011322761,0.012350859,0.007321479,0.003288627,0.007032986,0.0046546306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056922145,0.000004406424,0.000053495674,0.000014710623,0.0000067025408,0.000014748199,0.00010225882,0.00011205696,0.000038785987,0.98762333,0.0060086315,0.006015248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010608177,0.000010344942,0.00020907016,0.00007061628,0.000009970726,0.000073072624,0.000060166974,0.00043290775,0.0001114471,0.9315344,0.06746683,0.000010679333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033085365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004442768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03352202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005472367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004208618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112142324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248041483","doi":"10.1093/oep/gpt041","title":"Bait contracts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Economic Papers","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Library science; Media studies; Political science; Sociology; Art history; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.01598841920283141,"score_gpt":0.19288586713867018,"score_spread":0.17689744793583875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248041483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09021788,0.0048694075,0.33164996,0.021814344,0.00060091825,0.00029339787,0.0015292087,0.00038091344,0.5486439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9313716,0.0019404442,0.02762331,0.0024205386,0.0008411123,0.0003305672,0.0003065945,0.00010042196,0.035065323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902176,0.003766691,0.0006444638,0.0017783004,0.0025065062,0.001086275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762254,0.015715852,0.0025208674,0.0026492162,0.0018402126,0.0010484225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010480073,0.0007298545,0.002003382,0.001333626,0.002170368,0.004964042,0.0015009993,0.004448804,0.01690018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036793843,0.00068004057,0.00096502743,0.0012998922,0.0058702454,0.008518671,0.002360978,0.0047240825,0.0016631183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010064958,0.0000069723114,0.00012821163,0.000019107092,0.0000057194593,0.0000346724,0.0000497089,0.000517347,0.00009839744,0.9959741,0.00090777176,0.0022478914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025055504,0.00003064114,0.00024727525,0.00004021404,0.000008102177,0.00008383563,0.0000418297,0.0058589275,0.000165765,0.9866362,0.00685047,0.000011553555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015033245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013980191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01690018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003767092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037493424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056536734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248488576","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_245","title":"Crime, Incentive to","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Criminology; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03648643578427454,"score_gpt":0.2086028021197021,"score_spread":0.17211636633542757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248488576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013827503,0.0027405585,0.008044098,0.029748015,0.00044694656,0.00008111841,0.0002633651,0.000054622917,0.9447938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5731258,0.0037499678,0.0033546921,0.0067894496,0.0009972039,0.00019448064,0.00021591275,0.00006310241,0.41150945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980615,0.0005012832,0.0000612056,0.00044916614,0.00055633474,0.000370555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975598,0.0010766075,0.00032715988,0.0003586582,0.00037976008,0.0002980825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021045313,0.0003913672,0.00054924906,0.001037736,0.0019335911,0.0058043012,0.0011107356,0.004486067,0.042873703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009684067,0.00028813575,0.00024300869,0.00075749506,0.005515875,0.004785844,0.0017092549,0.003466855,0.002362016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060960283,0.000024650966,0.00021696917,0.000012492096,0.0000018726148,0.000009520322,0.00006470584,0.0001751437,0.00002539949,0.98475987,0.009179592,0.005523796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024590352,0.000021512,0.0013819957,0.0000911552,0.000007716312,0.00009021246,0.00024888178,0.0012196419,0.00016585395,0.8652571,0.13148181,0.000009374185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047705267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070604584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042873703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027097166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066311895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14342684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248540093","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-02135-0_1","title":"Introduction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Liability; Business; Public relations; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.025357957663580948,"score_gpt":0.1870774838667057,"score_spread":0.16171952620312474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248540093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042910717,0.0021648437,0.004568606,0.0045673577,0.003565366,0.000115155526,0.0024752403,0.0006996433,0.9814146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023552498,0.0015849515,0.001965284,0.0018674001,0.0008115574,0.000077631186,0.001980279,0.0002612351,0.98909634],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999244,0.00008921451,0.00003102917,0.00016910543,0.00037792468,0.0000888461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989454,0.0001670105,0.000039833943,0.00017061303,0.00048744286,0.00018967914],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008628153,0.0006802807,0.00051363424,0.0014125878,0.0014901785,0.004684163,0.0017400334,0.0019023934,0.5488977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029782944,0.00029348276,0.00046062304,0.0013800063,0.0007718385,0.0035336458,0.0021580893,0.0020103776,0.41826645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017824063,0.000031464595,0.000121863224,0.000097216034,0.0000020143245,0.000037530874,0.00016807552,0.00010036612,0.00019482177,0.08279108,0.8024705,0.113967165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001372652,0.0000038637736,0.00007818027,0.00004788754,6.201335e-7,0.00002775343,0.0000345659,0.000017401306,0.00004284064,0.0054014577,0.99434185,0.0000021394656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031706293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044996077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5488977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016645526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020550066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6434427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249062820","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v25i2.4613","title":"Economic Incarceration","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misdemeanor; Minor (academic); Sanctions; Population; Adjudication; Revenue; Business; Law; Political science; Finance; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.041893194412490085,"score_gpt":0.2691188120501002,"score_spread":0.2272256176376101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249062820","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007887472,0.0024886676,0.003965177,0.0049972404,0.0010459106,0.00015373372,0.00071186014,0.00033816497,0.9784118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08973174,0.0040646465,0.002599996,0.0036602234,0.00030192971,0.00021355075,0.0013393682,0.00017444023,0.8979141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984086,0.00019022521,0.000060866638,0.00019263444,0.00065166457,0.000496106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986761,0.00014715525,0.000108580614,0.00025615134,0.00059818354,0.00021373728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001218806,0.0006567148,0.0003413437,0.0020759078,0.0032585182,0.0030250566,0.001611358,0.001404068,0.13240655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042877034,0.00024407894,0.00059428986,0.0016493975,0.0009774547,0.0018031906,0.0035834117,0.0025258583,0.03172772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010785549,0.00018184558,0.0030654604,0.00024409688,0.000023409197,0.0006037531,0.0006260777,0.00065986754,0.00048427127,0.40610546,0.33025733,0.2576405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008831627,0.000033793185,0.0027911481,0.00011748638,0.0000073576966,0.00025941624,0.0002834511,0.00036246033,0.0003489582,0.009459204,0.9863164,0.00001140625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012477431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01788739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13240655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002851768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045103515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44294405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249398768","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007705","title":"Employing Fairness","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02348453156371052,"score_gpt":0.2186627810255215,"score_spread":0.19517824946181098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249398768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050231847,0.0016735798,0.016918048,0.015071365,0.00073769304,0.00009598424,0.00012613859,0.00011227668,0.9602418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44960332,0.002616176,0.0085889,0.011774795,0.0012331367,0.00036457885,0.00018357851,0.00019978873,0.5254357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99171585,0.0031986758,0.0003746599,0.001441253,0.0020633528,0.0012062337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99263376,0.0026208125,0.00054881803,0.002033885,0.0015962564,0.00056646403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008913068,0.0005246734,0.0004642265,0.0013953077,0.0062371376,0.006183216,0.0018093048,0.003303058,0.064729586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015610355,0.0002759476,0.00060348643,0.0017230076,0.009860465,0.0064092143,0.0060873986,0.0031794037,0.009966547],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009795069,0.000007619065,0.0002703006,0.00003125682,0.0000025978866,0.000034021752,0.0011814112,0.000107911794,0.000057179786,0.9742124,0.011838497,0.012246974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013393389,0.000023086814,0.00065292814,0.00019744778,0.000008625414,0.00010372696,0.0009887093,0.00039720046,0.00024691178,0.4282874,0.5690658,0.000014797247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071584596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065332735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064729586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057978025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077279545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21654207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249692133","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1741423","title":"Excessive Risk-Taking and the Structure of Executive Compensation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Executive compensation; Psychology; Business; Compensation (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Accounting; Social psychology","score_opus":0.017329302182955395,"score_gpt":0.19949100550879367,"score_spread":0.18216170332583828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249692133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9498288,0.00065477885,0.014201585,0.002294339,0.000022383687,0.00003905222,0.0001143976,0.000063565065,0.032780964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986526,0.000040975934,0.00035592413,0.000035513498,0.000021053294,0.0000040812192,0.000012343212,0.000002968063,0.00087455893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983682,0.0005623701,0.00011517784,0.00023312139,0.00032642452,0.0003946115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97309035,0.014263078,0.007427128,0.0017376572,0.0016982675,0.0017835803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002655031,0.0002073233,0.0005536988,0.0013979172,0.0010282618,0.0035677385,0.00080676365,0.0016811219,0.0075816093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030841589,0.0003633444,0.00025894286,0.0008324118,0.002203436,0.0025862565,0.0012477997,0.0016318519,0.0004616701],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006358995,0.0003600169,0.113180414,0.00008984823,0.0001124317,0.00060947053,0.0018382156,0.026849862,0.0033940412,0.80695826,0.0031209576,0.04285056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082795035,0.00013047829,0.07411308,0.00003314653,0.00003201026,0.00024149216,0.0005496536,0.03298955,0.00070543436,0.8893819,0.0017026693,0.000037825004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020916983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003117432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075816093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018353629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012208621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025363028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250154773","doi":"10.1007/978-3-540-68706-1_1125","title":"Reward-Related Incentive Learning","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.02214411568501566,"score_gpt":0.18930223333567875,"score_spread":0.16715811765066307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250154773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019161409,0.009663859,0.314097,0.014469061,0.0008321354,0.00009964201,0.00029398067,0.00027373098,0.64110917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6939708,0.007944244,0.036402494,0.0018023687,0.0012532872,0.00018226623,0.00023035734,0.00012655821,0.25808758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993344,0.00023900076,0.00002227461,0.00012304181,0.00020376309,0.00007755556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974107,0.0016839603,0.00017475309,0.00030554863,0.0002892377,0.00013567797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017754236,0.0004889733,0.0006241445,0.00048093311,0.00063625275,0.0023740195,0.00125996,0.001943199,0.018644216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077677285,0.00031235247,0.00033489038,0.00061140815,0.0024149134,0.003349653,0.00079538045,0.0032700794,0.002007669],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008491058,0.000027150068,0.00009222229,0.00002565352,0.000005151802,0.000009564386,0.000028620343,0.0026679551,0.00012661026,0.96953803,0.0065906225,0.020879913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005567479,0.0000078632875,0.00015209586,0.000018768413,0.000002599004,0.000021709993,0.000009377742,0.008647965,0.0001268844,0.9779926,0.013009051,0.0000056456593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076200307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009948503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018644216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019125092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014417794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062371135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250613322","doi":"10.23943/princeton/9780691152936.003.0006","title":"The Interwar and New Deal Years","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Princeton University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interwar period; Bureaucracy; Institution; Government (linguistics); Politics; Quarter (Canadian coin); First world war; World War II; Political science; New Deal; Economic history; Law; Public administration; Political economy; Economy; History; Sociology; Ancient history; Economics; Archaeology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04724235588240005,"score_gpt":0.1846403393150248,"score_spread":0.13739798343262474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250613322","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07447482,0.040772803,0.00089405157,0.013900366,0.0014459754,0.000019084844,0.00032806504,0.000031217147,0.86813366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59246886,0.0579268,0.0005999831,0.0060993466,0.0026942214,0.00009589773,0.0006722856,0.00009706276,0.33934548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939334,0.000096203774,0.000020612239,0.00007879896,0.00020999675,0.00020104872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995415,0.00017129573,0.00008661792,0.000035936606,0.000048531703,0.000116200325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006763496,0.00022664455,0.00020607421,0.0011934186,0.001920035,0.005579394,0.000527587,0.0011224353,0.017997473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017445815,0.00025159714,0.0001933654,0.0022055337,0.0020306527,0.0053941454,0.0025121646,0.0028867538,0.0018942243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057894937,0.00005839394,0.0022763652,0.00009094655,0.0000069321477,0.0002931091,0.008848317,0.00021128694,0.00025418226,0.87012374,0.05111634,0.06666246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052932173,0.000014069754,0.011141727,0.00018521251,0.0000034067514,0.000128954,0.0029223203,0.00009317476,0.00015167464,0.021982417,0.96336395,0.000007957201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004199246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013794664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017997473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038418865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014466234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060207546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251418864","doi":"10.2307/2696118","title":"Grievance Arbitration: Not the Venue for Health and Safety Appeals (Comment on Mark Harcourt and Sondra Harcourt, \"When Can an Employee Refuse Unsafe Work and Expect to Be Protected from Discipline? Evidence from Canada\")","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Labor Relations Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Grievance; Port harcourt; Work (physics); Psychology; Engineering; Sociology; Political science; Law; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.112327450468382,"score_gpt":0.28602785816322557,"score_spread":0.17370040769484357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251418864","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014980651,0.009108956,0.0005035809,0.9636656,0.0027009284,0.000025897847,0.00020682675,0.000036071757,0.022254014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043453947,0.003915985,0.00064723747,0.9322501,0.0052195806,0.000119110075,0.00010806926,0.000041591604,0.0142443925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9603884,0.009144005,0.0032143556,0.005248675,0.015610449,0.006394119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8931238,0.07660597,0.0075805075,0.0028365105,0.016476583,0.0033767472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040293116,0.00042391327,0.0014072928,0.0014114771,0.0131788505,0.012791825,0.0059116744,0.055129472,0.014098011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14698362,0.0010022885,0.001425313,0.0017891532,0.02075677,0.012534989,0.005076982,0.03998235,0.0044070636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005702502,0.000020627484,0.00094889814,0.00013783856,0.000015643878,0.00022877127,0.0016083495,0.00004661011,0.00010364038,0.17554903,0.8113467,0.0099367695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002903564,0.00007257111,0.0058570406,0.0015637195,0.00008983831,0.00047826685,0.005296704,0.00032106775,0.0005474714,0.13091025,0.8544357,0.00013691968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1387138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23747802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86128616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011388231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026716417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2758128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252508524","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1740749","title":"The Role of Distributive Justice and Proximity in Transfer Pricing: An Ethical Explanation of 'Anomalous' Experimental Economics Decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Distributive justice; Distributive property; Economic Justice; Experimental economics; Economics; Positive economics; Law and economics; Transfer pricing; Political science; Microeconomics; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.026334357244590573,"score_gpt":0.23210801754130195,"score_spread":0.20577366029671137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252508524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6048053,0.00048326582,0.19009365,0.059265815,0.00035856612,0.00024257529,0.0001791847,0.00019287213,0.1443788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931202,0.000050124723,0.0048939823,0.00084079476,0.000067168585,0.000063538944,0.0000069922144,0.000016984026,0.0009402488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98471385,0.010014119,0.00046766578,0.0014299891,0.0025318027,0.00084258115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8926322,0.08050933,0.0067485766,0.015855793,0.0029487957,0.0013053182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024140377,0.00028726214,0.0006975909,0.00076812966,0.0022594538,0.0051943525,0.0015653513,0.005169317,0.0076041957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10555106,0.00039119562,0.00043540326,0.00080277136,0.017645603,0.010028102,0.0029870123,0.0054310346,0.00037252047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006566228,0.000066625675,0.0012282237,0.000023100065,0.000012342282,0.0000556456,0.0010493613,0.00094822375,0.00030683138,0.991663,0.0007767948,0.0038040793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034481072,0.00001636189,0.0007042559,0.0000068208124,0.0000041394464,0.00003031968,0.00021158365,0.003961789,0.00027819865,0.9937888,0.00095416355,0.000009100529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080515584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084217964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024140377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016399901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019461957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12766802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253002096","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14638116","title":"Unmixing the mixed questions: a framework for distinguishing between questions of fact and questions of law in contractual interpretation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Supreme court; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Appeal; Political science; Common law; Judicial deference; Criticism; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04774219242103839,"score_gpt":0.2849374752109805,"score_spread":0.23719528278994212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253002096","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01775125,0.013173489,0.83596295,0.033611346,0.0006511271,0.0007025807,0.00016249636,0.00008677166,0.097897954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59238356,0.0040870695,0.3873548,0.0058682137,0.0010658088,0.0020259647,0.00019433658,0.00013485072,0.006885446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8790107,0.09871541,0.004369707,0.0059414045,0.008963407,0.0029994175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9191783,0.066142924,0.0050545037,0.004017979,0.004284624,0.0013216885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.102844715,0.0020782533,0.0019411693,0.017617473,0.013415273,0.024798702,0.0076995483,0.012852484,0.004319234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081096575,0.0022295974,0.002918825,0.009056213,0.11329837,0.05558048,0.015780153,0.012076968,0.0006785102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069937423,0.0000051469374,0.00020012468,0.00003022053,0.0000046842797,0.000057109934,0.0056210104,0.00012531785,0.00003136058,0.9900422,0.00019111588,0.0036846388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009635592,0.000012993809,0.0002219655,0.00014709916,0.00000942415,0.00008071538,0.0021583012,0.0012961302,0.00008279348,0.9849267,0.011033132,0.000021153885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014144904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013698115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102844715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017868852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016017757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5439013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253541419","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199248179.013.0023","title":"Corporations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Corporate law; Political science; Corporate governance; Work (physics); Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Accounting; Management; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.05935195787276439,"score_gpt":0.22855292381024972,"score_spread":0.16920096593748532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253541419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010854795,0.0012672206,0.00078215846,0.002574603,0.0006667093,0.000044751076,0.0006118004,0.00016080846,0.99280643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019023634,0.0019464524,0.00090987753,0.0022276316,0.00026859815,0.00005754295,0.0010080806,0.000111049245,0.97444725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983728,0.00018083469,0.000085743784,0.0004123705,0.0006985925,0.00024968493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999374,0.000065172666,0.00004837562,0.00014760112,0.0002704954,0.00009436117],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007623411,0.00052931596,0.0003502342,0.0014979402,0.0024384824,0.008221827,0.0010741461,0.0023774067,0.23256554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020564406,0.00029492113,0.000370984,0.0021977748,0.0009356952,0.0040207496,0.002969242,0.0020733173,0.100535266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027796226,0.000029099734,0.0009531296,0.00013153638,0.000008073479,0.00017809436,0.0005538367,0.00013438385,0.00024563266,0.5337164,0.3521695,0.111852616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017307641,0.0000044194207,0.00026256443,0.000033049382,0.0000012872966,0.00005000804,0.00009040238,0.000022684591,0.000057734822,0.004407743,0.99506575,0.0000027516724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006166078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007260059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7674345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024886772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028400507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253809620","doi":"10.24124/2016/1222","title":"Echoes of Colonialism: Implications of Wrongful Dismissal Judgements in Nigeria and Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Colonialism; Law; Political science; Unfair dismissal","score_opus":0.014174843886055203,"score_gpt":0.2219097633783183,"score_spread":0.2077349194922631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253809620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92791545,0.0014635507,0.0001338218,0.012973831,0.00014013094,0.000032636755,0.000082738065,0.000003612072,0.057254147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971123,0.0004958074,0.000052733772,0.0006423679,0.000010844032,0.000003444506,0.000012302238,0.0000040503414,0.001666282],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.990855,0.0017744814,0.00041014288,0.0007059288,0.0028149928,0.0034394527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9626764,0.01356647,0.004581645,0.000894174,0.013701922,0.00457938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064196233,0.00018707414,0.0004921415,0.0026286193,0.02752499,0.009373611,0.001410777,0.002091168,0.002263063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045045264,0.00031047608,0.00021433055,0.00449303,0.016704883,0.0015973549,0.0038457192,0.0043962104,0.00011343917],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044023542,0.00012895561,0.21289949,0.0003311527,0.00010505565,0.010866262,0.57754153,0.0014842453,0.0011854224,0.13894817,0.016586058,0.039483454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033609263,0.000034954868,0.2186085,0.0011623839,0.00010693549,0.00066303817,0.7172549,0.001133818,0.0008506494,0.008347085,0.051607672,0.000196455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9696679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9870364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07606178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07606178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.072978206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5518694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254303723","doi":"10.5040/9781782257912.ch-010","title":"Concurrent Fault at 90: A History of Ontario’s Negligence Act and Canada’s Uniform Contributory Fault Act","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fault (geology); Contributory negligence; Law; Forensic engineering; Political science; Seismology; Engineering; Geology; Tort; Liability","score_opus":0.031733657702126834,"score_gpt":0.18627885927155455,"score_spread":0.15454520156942772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254303723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020371199,0.049031984,0.001973916,0.08324982,0.0019891872,0.00013849718,0.001460813,0.00007961823,0.8417049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4251298,0.030920586,0.0016149996,0.039578374,0.000967735,0.00013866162,0.0005743746,0.00014856855,0.5009269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99380386,0.00046734774,0.00017231707,0.00046571332,0.0030593504,0.002031289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948302,0.0015845263,0.00029141962,0.0002240345,0.0023030043,0.0007669462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023164437,0.0005061045,0.0003859957,0.0029292835,0.014645546,0.009038357,0.002345703,0.008345137,0.009873355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010118254,0.00081127323,0.00050118595,0.0054197623,0.014763663,0.0033055753,0.0024365147,0.006166312,0.00095991197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030606385,0.000029014596,0.002155226,0.00012402752,0.000012460495,0.00034441968,0.013964239,0.00035117174,0.00011569591,0.6561041,0.29950356,0.027265402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011701114,0.000008702622,0.010034398,0.00033539988,0.00001776512,0.0000973666,0.0038551367,0.00014761275,0.00009009233,0.018369297,0.9669721,0.000060373557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99553055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99843293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16316254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16316254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25588813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9706128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254494009","doi":"10.1017/9781108594981.008","title":"Holdup, Holdout, and Royalty Stacking: A Review of the Literature","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Stacking; Materials science; Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05474204867005762,"score_gpt":0.2267695794319793,"score_spread":0.17202753076192168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254494009","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006054686,0.99874145,0.00007072356,0.00025889766,0.00004716514,0.0000016305316,0.00000905739,0.000001647791,0.00080887513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007305894,0.998728,0.00008274377,0.00013479513,0.0001131669,0.0000028023023,0.000011719724,0.0000011876994,0.00019502125],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987012,0.00029545417,0.00020827723,0.0002678894,0.00045473667,0.000072419556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993782,0.004840584,0.0005918241,0.00010288265,0.00057913596,0.0001034839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024686686,0.0010495401,0.0020686216,0.0059959968,0.0006555601,0.0027186817,0.0012733272,0.0025686142,0.0065440554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074271807,0.000725144,0.0009432359,0.008821764,0.0019128151,0.0038165206,0.0010918151,0.002330353,0.001994332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007831223,0.00009718141,0.00048242742,0.04526026,0.00018030744,0.00017939426,0.0001933179,0.00086978666,0.00040594756,0.02841315,0.025795413,0.89804447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001706782,0.00012475568,0.0028127215,0.039066438,0.00032381047,0.0009352823,0.00025887057,0.00019806129,0.00035522916,0.017473117,0.9383831,0.00005158274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004261989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005179209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065440554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020873514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00450183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021892011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254830926","doi":"10.1108/s0885-3339(2013)0000014015","title":"List of Contributors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Schools of economic thought; Publishing; Library science; Emerald; Management; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.01882086019041843,"score_gpt":0.19484523786370356,"score_spread":0.17602437767328513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254830926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00086210336,0.013376695,0.0043916274,0.039227836,0.16664027,0.0019915812,0.07418796,0.0061657955,0.6931562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023476584,0.0061457143,0.002119864,0.0074636824,0.010972065,0.001074343,0.027086401,0.0017616181,0.94102865],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959383,0.000567476,0.00040969983,0.00064286473,0.0020181814,0.0004234156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97599024,0.0018302896,0.0007541949,0.0021390724,0.016274812,0.0030113298],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032597496,0.0016741595,0.001883896,0.008100244,0.0037889353,0.012053466,0.0033756627,0.0036016328,0.71983296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024899105,0.0005697341,0.0009856513,0.008079242,0.00076278625,0.0065758647,0.004470211,0.002955592,0.7349816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006315771,0.000004926633,0.00004541141,0.0001307404,0.000001245819,0.000014558469,0.000026335498,0.00001069177,0.000044697987,0.0006101557,0.98001236,0.019092634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025513186,0.0000046237906,0.00010333595,0.00017049361,0.0000018829818,0.000029070765,0.00005635821,0.00001870167,0.0000346656,0.00037927055,0.99919397,0.000005098175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032621783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043877326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28016704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025050365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006451815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3996243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254839842","doi":"10.1350/clwr.2010.39.3.0211","title":"Getting to Grips With the Shareholder Value Theory in Corporate Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Common Law World Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shareholder value; Shareholder; Shareholder primacy; Corporate law; Value (mathematics); Stakeholder; Stakeholder theory; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Shareholder resolution; Business; Shareholder loan; Accounting; Law; Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.04901545279999093,"score_gpt":0.2369588806333884,"score_spread":0.1879434278333975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254839842","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021732425,0.079856634,0.10949601,0.5761514,0.0041231476,0.00006852871,0.00008933968,0.00011233859,0.20837025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.772853,0.06538343,0.045729056,0.06663253,0.01725098,0.00028887347,0.00014076261,0.00027092907,0.031450395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98597175,0.008163187,0.00038700693,0.0010472791,0.0036053904,0.00082532776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96904254,0.0260952,0.000983451,0.001221593,0.0018435821,0.00081370433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018697063,0.0008813168,0.0015179927,0.0036239745,0.0056149806,0.014571907,0.0024675168,0.010657401,0.0050818496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0233022,0.00067276176,0.0011617966,0.0033892002,0.0817236,0.04229656,0.006044685,0.023856254,0.0015408017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029934238,0.000010160518,0.000081350496,0.000027780028,0.0000023611963,0.00002726122,0.0008285541,0.00012543594,0.000026282898,0.9935196,0.0017878967,0.0035602227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041998064,0.000007969413,0.00008130686,0.00011072431,0.0000013879002,0.000016446496,0.00040560352,0.00026561657,0.000038319675,0.98635536,0.012705858,0.000007203014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058652605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042054136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018697063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009537829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060473443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09888071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254981771","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.1090012","title":"Factual error","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science","score_opus":0.01812285167095613,"score_gpt":0.20848082040165075,"score_spread":0.19035796873069463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254981771","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00433651,0.011282139,0.124545075,0.40685973,0.29681376,0.0032860509,0.012236483,0.0028725683,0.13776775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2381538,0.010135738,0.10979584,0.43419385,0.07748223,0.009313875,0.0061568148,0.0023184058,0.11244944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7183181,0.13560002,0.04259229,0.038113754,0.060145378,0.0052304366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4468145,0.31245723,0.040758148,0.12295452,0.07287442,0.0041412013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17534472,0.0022118746,0.004465973,0.008735589,0.0039597945,0.010273546,0.006293423,0.013874337,0.03466339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.59427226,0.0017960849,0.0021934656,0.009151047,0.014958625,0.011659674,0.007760598,0.014816329,0.018622965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043862627,0.000053218915,0.0010424623,0.0014466974,0.00025182567,0.0008913261,0.004520453,0.00033965454,0.00019503706,0.2313703,0.7149577,0.04449269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111357884,0.000032771863,0.0005517783,0.003820876,0.00009758134,0.00096809265,0.0009785949,0.0012183897,0.0008936614,0.12829018,0.86296034,0.00007632276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026752444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002866334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17534472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009972171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009403848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9273226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256305878","doi":"10.1515/rle-2015-0032","title":"Malice Aforethought","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Law & Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Malice; Deterrence (psychology); Property (philosophy); Criminology; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04006126741161607,"score_gpt":0.24232207662672448,"score_spread":0.20226080921510842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256305878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00660862,0.00800129,0.002746419,0.092179954,0.016638162,0.00006376383,0.0008053754,0.00046997383,0.87248653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060033083,0.0025929033,0.00077652687,0.028189594,0.002318679,0.000050548748,0.00025056436,0.00013339939,0.9056547],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998754,0.0003447602,0.00008052282,0.00021127271,0.0003660355,0.0002434897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983046,0.00047159148,0.00019329744,0.00026310724,0.00051529525,0.0002521502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010342337,0.00047997385,0.0005468378,0.0006444268,0.0036768597,0.0033195538,0.0009513548,0.003174481,0.16648959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005450717,0.00020572986,0.00033328735,0.00040034784,0.00193447,0.0026561513,0.0033168588,0.004437998,0.07072229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047455746,0.000033669363,0.00092728966,0.000120242075,0.00001215156,0.0009136027,0.001438218,0.00012384666,0.00032395788,0.33700624,0.6069886,0.052064747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003620606,0.000010807103,0.00037428288,0.00010945254,0.0000030988479,0.00043132377,0.00031336036,0.000074127915,0.00020124456,0.008709213,0.9897613,0.000008111881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031627228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00635864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16648959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014285096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017653166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55696315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256417353","doi":"10.4324/9781315673950","title":"Delay and Disruption in Construction Contracts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.01921398271357422,"score_gpt":0.2002956364232007,"score_spread":0.18108165370962648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256417353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023579257,0.01629378,0.030912912,0.03213383,0.002861014,0.00019722678,0.0002576543,0.000151654,0.8936128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5880982,0.009500795,0.0045683715,0.006187839,0.0015923438,0.00028242538,0.00016682183,0.00019454742,0.38940865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98633,0.0034702967,0.0007284683,0.0014223529,0.006149917,0.0018989834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894894,0.005120421,0.0011024805,0.0014209875,0.0019645686,0.0009021658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065185577,0.0004622562,0.0004597856,0.001385926,0.0051142825,0.011865816,0.0019265972,0.0043568723,0.014375571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035789307,0.00060338725,0.0005180155,0.0026754732,0.011839719,0.011178837,0.0060448516,0.006982494,0.002393437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021687893,0.000009870697,0.0003196912,0.000035189398,0.0000023008688,0.000089357214,0.0028076686,0.00066251284,0.000067464454,0.9642932,0.021658823,0.010032293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015410882,0.000048324062,0.0009237311,0.00025378112,0.000008492455,0.00023717461,0.0040319622,0.0009512187,0.0001382612,0.31489888,0.67846256,0.000030215948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018184723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00962573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018184723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014253701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013132546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10341829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256421047","doi":"10.1092/7h69-cute-yl8j-gnh3","title":"Discussion of \"Improving Jurors' Evaluations of Auditors in Negligence Cases\"","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Accounting; Business; Actuarial science; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.12718839721196504,"score_gpt":0.3423655852493239,"score_spread":0.21517718803735889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256421047","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09287313,0.009906756,0.139945,0.6802746,0.0049023903,0.0008217889,0.00056362327,0.00093378476,0.06977879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.816739,0.0032573747,0.110842966,0.053996302,0.004181312,0.0005166686,0.00019800749,0.00008259322,0.010185736],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94087476,0.048122108,0.0018402949,0.0014202434,0.006124321,0.0016182028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76897943,0.19120784,0.011650746,0.0056887083,0.020245055,0.0022283124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0883793,0.0009109223,0.0011343851,0.0024461686,0.004334351,0.0061468626,0.003511874,0.010337588,0.005784635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30937192,0.0004894499,0.0016595506,0.0026813464,0.004823485,0.004890021,0.0030098152,0.004837277,0.0006630414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006613651,0.00073696085,0.022150824,0.0017385866,0.0005998535,0.00084831397,0.00826788,0.032536283,0.0018783979,0.269982,0.22756043,0.43303913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008561232,0.0015963021,0.10253197,0.0037640464,0.0015411829,0.0010904891,0.009922958,0.06748059,0.011866523,0.6599087,0.13902096,0.00042011097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008647484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025164321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0883793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004309332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009062588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281896359","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v37i1.7195","title":"As the Water Grinds the Stone: Comparison of Represented and Self-represented Appellant Populations in the Federal Court of Appeal","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Windsor; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Population; Political science; Federal court; Psychology; Supreme court; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.0705370376734049,"score_gpt":0.3057938912696534,"score_spread":0.23525685359624848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281896359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99850035,0.00007732459,0.00011038347,0.00009500426,0.0000031678023,0.000020751046,0.000083802755,0.00000218973,0.0011069679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993781,0.000042320924,0.00005513008,0.00006637836,0.000005399639,0.000011140612,0.00009949673,0.0000016076351,0.00034044997],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946904,0.001005001,0.00032237617,0.0007839357,0.0022022766,0.0009959185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937091,0.0010813881,0.0025456604,0.0003774837,0.0013818338,0.0009044704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030336282,0.00010767579,0.00030184005,0.0030131813,0.0026919867,0.0019917104,0.0010211193,0.00064493803,0.0014802796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009961697,0.00018931497,0.00019316896,0.0017503109,0.0015491083,0.0011323305,0.00195846,0.00050750474,0.00020164011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006867119,0.00008849256,0.9631701,0.000019091336,0.00004115694,0.00029911703,0.02314022,0.000037211674,0.00063050224,0.00069904537,0.000754021,0.011052343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016348122,0.00005128852,0.9812997,0.000010303038,0.000009294332,0.0002197884,0.01695734,0.000161198,0.0001510948,0.00008592734,0.0010429147,0.000009624107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19643725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36645755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80356276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002661838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024591403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3905877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283781506","doi":"10.1007/s10991-022-09301-x","title":"The Rise of the Mailbox Rule and Formation of Contracts in English, US and Canadian Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Liverpool Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; German; Interpretation (philosophy); Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Set (abstract data type); Political science; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.014739705353287953,"score_gpt":0.18724510331136318,"score_spread":0.17250539795807524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283781506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16294837,0.063716106,0.0043470087,0.17216514,0.0008736084,0.00011604908,0.0014640845,0.0001528907,0.5942167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8999485,0.017226841,0.002145665,0.011454769,0.00046020938,0.00004261117,0.00028357925,0.0000807291,0.06835714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98891,0.0015348002,0.00044032288,0.00088458037,0.0053260964,0.0029041723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9506037,0.018787814,0.002124387,0.0014251161,0.023887826,0.003171159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0108197,0.00018424251,0.0005572487,0.0048074545,0.009349444,0.013339644,0.0022418736,0.0051707546,0.009478834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056212094,0.00045016236,0.0003588813,0.005586536,0.0114191845,0.0048562605,0.0011701037,0.004173626,0.0005306537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004846479,0.000031581003,0.0049194167,0.00009048062,0.000011774608,0.000064690656,0.0025557133,0.00050062034,0.00014414855,0.91230124,0.039621744,0.039710164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075790056,0.000057804813,0.14313166,0.0011029381,0.00014095099,0.00014750536,0.008276545,0.003649527,0.0012793286,0.25645834,0.58546257,0.0002169545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9637694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97908497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079752505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.079752505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11827006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5786476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285161254","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4116231","title":"Authority in a Simple Screening Model","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Mathematics; Computer science; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029233582336746222,"score_gpt":0.22740292605055554,"score_spread":0.19816934371380932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285161254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4416213,0.0017938282,0.1676651,0.031824768,0.00052086933,0.00029993118,0.0018730063,0.0009979559,0.3534032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94222444,0.0003743435,0.0038696362,0.0005886993,0.00027044973,0.00007549246,0.0001283602,0.00005159778,0.052417003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763644,0.00091008324,0.00009194653,0.0003541361,0.00034954576,0.0006578656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98976517,0.006156305,0.0011534191,0.0007826098,0.0008823821,0.0012601669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035401091,0.0009460241,0.003461691,0.002138126,0.002288708,0.0057066595,0.0029653022,0.007129924,0.025882486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012194754,0.0009994612,0.0016023773,0.0017528122,0.0041055796,0.0065097967,0.0021157358,0.0028158873,0.0028618795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009413519,0.00012547619,0.0005684034,0.000060142036,0.000030698655,0.00043557215,0.00014904601,0.038175616,0.00031794602,0.95340174,0.0047543254,0.001886946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027792025,0.00006689062,0.00062379456,0.00003016967,0.000039185732,0.00021180719,0.00014395875,0.27333546,0.00009762983,0.72356933,0.0015498376,0.000053933174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011266073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009234875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025882486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026404145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002555471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08658552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285195029","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4118912","title":"Statutory Unfair Dismissal in Canada: What is the Value of a Lost Job?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Statutory law; Unfair dismissal; Value (mathematics); Business; Law; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.009542780850420988,"score_gpt":0.18298197372988345,"score_spread":0.17343919287946247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285195029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55329365,0.02073641,0.0004171115,0.33823878,0.0011413265,0.000107206695,0.003760945,0.000053816504,0.082250774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693019,0.0047312584,0.000121788755,0.013787529,0.0002382042,0.000016097754,0.00045369274,0.000029612935,0.011320107],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98426,0.0010104411,0.00037147666,0.000702356,0.005701315,0.007954415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9535616,0.005712607,0.005246239,0.0005667143,0.020435166,0.014477714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006075103,0.00035102473,0.0010839237,0.0037176232,0.012640246,0.012527619,0.0046672686,0.0083912425,0.009574011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042008307,0.0005021244,0.00065734034,0.008255225,0.00808905,0.0032281517,0.0032101336,0.010444101,0.0005836208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008422639,0.0004910919,0.3356131,0.0007875783,0.00038743878,0.0023193138,0.026777389,0.0031255411,0.00042443693,0.19389425,0.31465715,0.120680384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027136152,0.00018824021,0.6423104,0.0032935562,0.0006135307,0.0006872099,0.117626496,0.0051456364,0.00052849686,0.034411523,0.19432563,0.0005979136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9973024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1805485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1805485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34787306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95044756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285206835","doi":"10.7202/1090021ar","title":"Ejan MacKaay, Stéphane Rousseau, Pierre Larouche et Alain Parent, Analyse économique du droit, 3 éd., Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2021, 936 p., ISBN 978-2-247-16221-5.","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.015500623208123126,"score_gpt":0.20722811534488794,"score_spread":0.19172749213676482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285206835","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023035685,0.93073124,0.0016573137,0.024665695,0.003405653,0.000017498196,0.00047997895,0.00010775181,0.038704526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049408576,0.84464866,0.002769579,0.004107396,0.003487631,0.00006076237,0.0006157065,0.00028114728,0.13908824],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982299,0.0002561355,0.00008979086,0.0002823581,0.0010314636,0.00011032201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975848,0.0012792144,0.00025845238,0.0000660037,0.0006812074,0.00013029955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017978161,0.001924439,0.0014223624,0.0037135633,0.0012133219,0.0046217283,0.0016214688,0.0034012545,0.06660765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049401904,0.0010664318,0.00055814494,0.006613773,0.00170193,0.009220524,0.0013967481,0.00413836,0.05401191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027236647,0.000014814988,0.0001772805,0.0009470888,0.000016029398,0.00005532634,0.0005159799,0.00010369951,0.00014721576,0.024172954,0.888286,0.08553632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004819339,0.000003617986,0.00061035587,0.00054606155,0.000005920917,0.000099900804,0.00019846192,0.000052110703,0.000070828326,0.0054308474,0.9929644,0.000012675973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047877472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06966098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06660765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048441794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005583353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22282481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285307159","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4128083","title":"A Dual Appraoch to Agency Problems: Existence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Dual (grammatical number); Business; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.024706367111709173,"score_gpt":0.215320718216031,"score_spread":0.19061435110432182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285307159","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06409846,0.011306187,0.47888267,0.1406671,0.0018037515,0.000089370085,0.00030265472,0.00014969813,0.3027001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90317136,0.005722834,0.045175854,0.0045277798,0.005058522,0.00022432886,0.00016306133,0.000114320246,0.035841778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967434,0.0015397051,0.00015446078,0.00073431723,0.0005233729,0.00030476993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97957486,0.014922357,0.0011400306,0.0018856324,0.0015906292,0.0008864349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005300072,0.0006083055,0.0013029905,0.0021694677,0.0031380604,0.008990428,0.00196405,0.007447323,0.01360908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024887472,0.000767774,0.001339019,0.0015043941,0.016009161,0.01744228,0.005560599,0.009611304,0.0010822796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056158624,0.000006854383,0.00007233533,0.000014281212,0.0000026824289,0.000017313705,0.000058380283,0.00010144116,0.00002010598,0.99707556,0.0011482721,0.0014771725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005706681,0.0000024472865,0.000028941533,0.000008975977,0.0000019566364,0.000028280323,0.000035596957,0.0007716903,0.000009754246,0.9975974,0.0015065919,0.0000025527236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008594123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006278579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01360908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022429214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019908387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04552692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293101102","doi":"10.36592/9786581110628-1","title":"A evolução da neurociências do comportamento humano e sua repercussão na teoria jurídica do crime: a casuística da culpabilidade","year":2022,"lang":"pt","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Raymond and Beverly Sackler Institute for Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Yale University; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; European Commission; Governo Brasil; Yale University","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.04804111959385573,"score_gpt":0.24381798912552904,"score_spread":0.1957768695316733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293101102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23834908,0.015367591,0.027723324,0.02895337,0.0003149893,0.000046651574,0.0004270707,0.00009596834,0.68872184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96578205,0.0048683104,0.004331441,0.00045742095,0.00010864585,0.000026553556,0.000061239894,0.000032097647,0.024332188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925905,0.0002762357,0.000023769386,0.00016016305,0.00020065243,0.00008015293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969223,0.001573128,0.000514738,0.00024953648,0.00052889844,0.00021141848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017513328,0.0002439926,0.00021475031,0.001231803,0.0012803986,0.0063513834,0.0008948411,0.0014178265,0.006744964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005952457,0.00024533604,0.00020690306,0.0014784998,0.011352227,0.0039280625,0.001539092,0.0014635142,0.00070198276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026245467,0.000030299694,0.009178024,0.00008554825,0.000013648705,0.00014700355,0.0062496853,0.0012035962,0.0007471531,0.9344329,0.004087053,0.04379872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012518128,0.00009173637,0.060177784,0.00033332125,0.000041077627,0.00065184134,0.012207057,0.004823776,0.0013761461,0.8339974,0.086235315,0.000052016847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074918303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015114785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074918303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002579774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032010693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022564113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293768876","doi":"10.1093/qje/qjac029","title":"Increasing the Demand for Workers with a Criminal Record","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Quarterly Journal of Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; American Economic Association","keywords":"Staffing; Criminal record; Sample (material); Productivity; Business; Work (physics); Subsidy; Actuarial science; Labour economics; Criminal history; Economics; Demographic economics; Criminology; Engineering; Psychology; Economic growth; Management","score_opus":0.03445553720657384,"score_gpt":0.21385416003064944,"score_spread":0.1793986228240756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293768876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918662,0.000030315065,0.00055426697,0.00052314386,0.000029372255,0.000057722045,0.0001666105,0.000055185443,0.006717221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639904,0.00002421122,0.00051639206,0.00017628567,0.000028095286,0.0000843101,0.000114906274,0.000011372879,0.002645265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998109,0.0006892115,0.00009399821,0.00032744897,0.0003894305,0.00039095056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787298,0.01028185,0.0043374775,0.002465949,0.0014207015,0.0027641663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017585995,0.0004913208,0.00054088526,0.0007119234,0.0014524865,0.0017421551,0.0011346181,0.0016837216,0.032426696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016075956,0.00040202678,0.00039070795,0.00042265712,0.00070987304,0.001328386,0.0019047064,0.0010735374,0.0037903748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015034512,0.033130683,0.59485483,0.00083172816,0.00026069317,0.0020114016,0.006955001,0.01547817,0.06365978,0.012144009,0.022771753,0.23286748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019978744,0.022912925,0.83342487,0.00033432533,0.0002629626,0.0010320444,0.017177038,0.047412448,0.016559178,0.016600087,0.04188322,0.0004030092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030970885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035343545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032426696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011260514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009820696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10847807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295168725","doi":"10.1086/717755","title":"A Study of Umbrella Damages from Bid Rigging","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Cartel; Bidding; Business; Liability; Collusion; Industrial organization; Finance; Law; Marketing","score_opus":0.045263242558407454,"score_gpt":0.22364064802763012,"score_spread":0.17837740546922265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295168725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97864246,0.0006729533,0.0043141297,0.00047909367,0.000013128474,0.000056600482,0.0002162981,0.000027289381,0.015578023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766904,0.00013574985,0.00028486687,0.0000362208,0.000013726211,0.000007230687,0.00010177168,0.0000045690263,0.0017468955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833655,0.0005852777,0.00008433929,0.00016914033,0.0004689479,0.00035571482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98157835,0.008908387,0.00689162,0.0010380199,0.00093354244,0.00065003923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027185266,0.0003281482,0.00051215367,0.0013514567,0.00083134434,0.0022624366,0.0009407426,0.00114854,0.0052245697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017322905,0.00034139608,0.00062592747,0.0012188241,0.0011424087,0.0020595342,0.0008432902,0.002001979,0.00037394566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001537712,0.0016399892,0.49159607,0.00037977504,0.0007422407,0.0034388222,0.0036904614,0.14581436,0.009017112,0.2146018,0.005550711,0.12199106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011081512,0.0014865751,0.73106796,0.00013850702,0.00024046782,0.0021396854,0.0025419488,0.18453476,0.003901792,0.064176135,0.009502225,0.00015910424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006545935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071896585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006545935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024376705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092955225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017686605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W42978306","doi":"10.29173/alr68","title":"Gross Negligence in Canadian Energy Contracts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Gross output; Economics; Gross anatomy; Law; Political science; Production (economics); Macroeconomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.021117194394072957,"score_gpt":0.21045823798562194,"score_spread":0.189341043591549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W42978306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11356614,0.035418253,0.008065412,0.042116884,0.0007337739,0.00018717827,0.0009462328,0.00007883871,0.7988872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92867213,0.01470642,0.0035823425,0.00562952,0.00016967599,0.00004970652,0.00033949426,0.00004001706,0.04681065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98204607,0.0017574433,0.0006999196,0.0009982765,0.01186835,0.0026299278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858453,0.004200558,0.00077130366,0.0007135039,0.0077247196,0.0007446565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00713835,0.0003112502,0.00045233095,0.0055601005,0.01099338,0.008346566,0.001764459,0.0038781879,0.0032874488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0280507,0.0004689982,0.00051319646,0.0064100525,0.009699005,0.0019797855,0.0017517962,0.0026891055,0.00021514216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009815853,0.0000083522755,0.0023935002,0.000069332105,0.000008926796,0.00019761977,0.0018077213,0.0022518844,0.00013331207,0.95413166,0.021195196,0.017792767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023831495,0.000028426624,0.061700296,0.0010740325,0.00007886336,0.0004423317,0.004651443,0.0051556015,0.0005837331,0.28063747,0.6453692,0.00025483785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97793245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9821041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09990502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09990502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13795969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7248651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298006822","doi":"10.3917/nresi.094.0025","title":"Autodétermination : historique, définitions et modèles conceptuels","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"La Nouvelle revue Éducation et société inclusives/La Nouvelle revue Éducation et société inclusives","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.04232306997160622,"score_gpt":0.3075393056327393,"score_spread":0.26521623566113306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298006822","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04365468,0.073961124,0.4514896,0.05384409,0.001407402,0.00015808054,0.0006502239,0.00021629808,0.37461853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8569259,0.03553895,0.06655323,0.0027425298,0.0013161061,0.00045170184,0.00042817206,0.00019250752,0.035850853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538875,0.0027537567,0.0002158761,0.0005834336,0.0008395472,0.0002186569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923098,0.0050775446,0.0007448468,0.00091638777,0.00069976685,0.00025152153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064245956,0.0007962658,0.00084831927,0.0035361769,0.0021091579,0.007956683,0.0019472685,0.0022321704,0.005920225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010520014,0.00061386114,0.0009527794,0.0054566734,0.017829688,0.012440218,0.0031528762,0.00574377,0.0008293943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018665322,0.0000037942557,0.00009357612,0.000017215378,0.0000016087415,0.000008966577,0.00035832432,0.00039028798,0.000007706884,0.99695957,0.00033349416,0.0018236603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042930246,0.00000739006,0.00016266551,0.00010307731,0.0000033528431,0.000048481215,0.0003983636,0.0022513994,0.00004620171,0.9567669,0.04020047,0.0000073364736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063618496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003645561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007956683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068317964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003934402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049568355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298862500","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2029312","title":"Optimal Disclosure Policy and Undue Diligence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Undue influence; Business; Due diligence; Accounting; Law; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.023737408583195674,"score_gpt":0.21418729084119534,"score_spread":0.19044988225799966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298862500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8349763,0.0019099503,0.037423108,0.034394346,0.00032797075,0.000107142325,0.00042766923,0.00029140405,0.09014201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99498594,0.00021422486,0.0007519889,0.00045834557,0.00007926925,0.000010980227,0.000018057879,0.000010897511,0.003470342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960647,0.001548502,0.000194053,0.00050060224,0.0003509263,0.0013412804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9476334,0.03839866,0.0073069693,0.0023865076,0.002245477,0.002028962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01021091,0.0003959172,0.0011422476,0.0007562425,0.0010843978,0.0045162817,0.0008775197,0.003922069,0.008129017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064442426,0.00042340276,0.0003162704,0.00049259607,0.0019258098,0.0029773533,0.0014228772,0.0028775025,0.00068372133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015187897,0.0007328973,0.029227966,0.00019892852,0.00013141728,0.00083402294,0.0012615573,0.045909755,0.0024919163,0.85229105,0.012489751,0.052911963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027758247,0.00031784864,0.01675733,0.00007745799,0.00007923438,0.00030185192,0.0010979758,0.062741786,0.00213941,0.91120857,0.0049409033,0.000059986727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018978484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017401136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01021091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029121202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025802094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054001153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300517899","doi":"10.3386/w19873","title":"Trial and Settlement: A Study of High-Low Agreements","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Business; Finance","score_opus":0.3255863416780051,"score_gpt":0.44626449488848663,"score_spread":0.12067815321048153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300517899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.852636,0.00091278274,0.02145611,0.004450234,0.000040721945,0.00018577566,0.00020889926,0.00002936005,0.12008011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99644107,0.00016164071,0.0010775517,0.00020277788,0.000030044328,0.000050741044,0.00006442077,0.000012117933,0.0019595972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837675,0.009261831,0.000873555,0.0012368407,0.002666938,0.0021933448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8625401,0.094900474,0.027261062,0.004384885,0.004763312,0.006150156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018039482,0.00021673492,0.0008754781,0.0022643642,0.0069272853,0.008121143,0.0019240918,0.0024910434,0.014004128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07252555,0.0003909376,0.0005425856,0.003047887,0.0073156655,0.00755977,0.005195336,0.0057160826,0.0012055023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038461998,0.0010897596,0.12173542,0.00019152153,0.000077065226,0.0011827402,0.02507635,0.0027816168,0.0007178274,0.80778015,0.0030277108,0.035955213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002626482,0.0008370055,0.14238435,0.0004906853,0.00013305285,0.0018005013,0.08570548,0.02754578,0.0012793184,0.6995785,0.039830092,0.00015264991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047493433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034885972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018039482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040116613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037406336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095403016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303431179","doi":"10.7202/1091954ar","title":"Les mentions exigées par la loi protègent-elles les consommateurs ? Le cas du contrat d’arrangements préalables de services funéraires","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.013332965081858722,"score_gpt":0.20711661365329825,"score_spread":0.19378364857143954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303431179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39678878,0.0035987177,0.0068202238,0.028852418,0.00046215014,0.00010864595,0.0005247746,0.00008376906,0.5627606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83800614,0.0016536133,0.0015607586,0.002309546,0.00009832945,0.00008542986,0.00018350364,0.000052924504,0.15604982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99310076,0.0018894192,0.00022239615,0.00087514747,0.002376614,0.0015356387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98843795,0.003831884,0.001985817,0.0009342187,0.0036699204,0.0011401678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043756445,0.00033989537,0.00045487992,0.002107318,0.010277471,0.007975977,0.0015777925,0.0018713119,0.022413261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014975082,0.0004269508,0.00027586397,0.0035621263,0.0071708057,0.004481889,0.0028075874,0.0026825035,0.0016430112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119611315,0.000077806886,0.04159543,0.00053997565,0.000054671415,0.0009614179,0.28009942,0.00034825565,0.00171863,0.52129143,0.031208834,0.12198459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017580658,0.00006263555,0.10565076,0.00093875895,0.000064606866,0.0003619171,0.20679617,0.0006696063,0.0014443394,0.013857827,0.67003226,0.000103539736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51240915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7181751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51240915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022662265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015282397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9809247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307649868","doi":"10.1002/sea2.12264","title":"Taxis vs. Uber: Courts, markets, and technology in Buenos Aires. By Juan Manueldel Nido. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2021. 256 pp.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Anthropology","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Taxis; Citation; History; Art history; Library science; Humanities; Art; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.008521832830540615,"score_gpt":0.19222038620071422,"score_spread":0.1836985533701736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307649868","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010131934,0.9386939,0.00012783679,0.034044586,0.0031925614,0.0000068812687,0.00054918276,0.000029819377,0.022342056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.070087574,0.72391194,0.0007468639,0.005867722,0.0044734906,0.000058212176,0.0010698515,0.00009475921,0.19368955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997359,0.00007284457,0.000018090093,0.000056027806,0.00006791407,0.000049136142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996165,0.00014132548,0.00007078052,0.00001364443,0.00009253619,0.00006513417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005651016,0.0015632913,0.00077700085,0.002536935,0.0022151405,0.0036381292,0.0010371617,0.0023275176,0.03146377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001040149,0.0008521147,0.0003659762,0.00537936,0.0019810617,0.0041483846,0.0010647973,0.0023816978,0.005246297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061373816,0.000030162459,0.0011819857,0.00036040138,0.000017390807,0.00006956097,0.0010475419,0.00016977268,0.00006610189,0.020586397,0.9121897,0.06421966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018138795,0.000008754634,0.010432713,0.0012013826,0.000017922,0.00010305731,0.0021787386,0.00017508083,0.00006693206,0.008166749,0.97761613,0.000014418542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24805468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38751835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24805468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007469554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030028522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4932217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310047289","doi":"10.1163/22134514-bja10043","title":"Penalty Default Rules in French, German and Louisianan Contract Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Default rule; Order (exchange); Bad faith; Incentive; German; Contract theory; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Political science; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.029045076738159026,"score_gpt":0.23354506689672658,"score_spread":0.20449999015856754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310047289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62234896,0.002911621,0.013217367,0.01570428,0.00010930971,0.00012369604,0.00078481593,0.00012462078,0.34467533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990944,0.0001922525,0.0013336953,0.00080134784,0.000018000363,0.0000321817,0.00009833747,0.000006611961,0.0065735336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478877,0.0015755025,0.00032996968,0.00054539426,0.0013544079,0.0014060598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925557,0.003206712,0.00088722946,0.00055911974,0.002232773,0.0005585806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005226429,0.00016227031,0.00037914215,0.0021986344,0.0052360366,0.0067752167,0.0008436728,0.0024129096,0.004115642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012330896,0.00017977328,0.00046328714,0.0017739303,0.0073175044,0.0020955608,0.0016877772,0.0023128628,0.00026034896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026182677,0.00002575125,0.006647605,0.0000116649235,0.0000082482575,0.00014646008,0.0021706412,0.0011201045,0.00011994948,0.97998583,0.0039757458,0.0057618907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001554007,0.00010075738,0.0979221,0.00045313657,0.00007216136,0.00072629115,0.0101811495,0.023875069,0.0010100363,0.6281237,0.23709424,0.00028598926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38102096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33329147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38102096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022611847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008414032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7576063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312607885","doi":"10.3982/ecta17386","title":"A General Framework for Robust Contracting Models","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econometrica","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Counterparty; Property (philosophy); Stochastic game; Computer science; Contract theory; Bayesian probability; Moral hazard; Mathematical economics; Microeconomics; Economics; Econometrics; Actuarial science; Credit risk; Incentive; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.076894047344921,"score_gpt":0.2356300573166265,"score_spread":0.1587360099717055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312607885","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003858156,0.00062738196,0.97203696,0.0023254657,0.00005955228,0.00005767641,0.0002870762,0.00017248365,0.020575281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64904356,0.0036876781,0.30477712,0.0017917784,0.0009533522,0.0010261688,0.00072945806,0.00039875397,0.037592027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695635,0.0017060514,0.00012757417,0.0004476296,0.0005020725,0.00026032378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943409,0.0034348376,0.00085818296,0.00073875196,0.0003793348,0.00024799546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005738514,0.0013132936,0.0015322355,0.0010931654,0.0010235382,0.0032016523,0.0035789828,0.0039179414,0.0133052515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013718268,0.0008584044,0.0021820508,0.0014528497,0.0024163164,0.0040828935,0.0024846073,0.004070099,0.001895541],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000511103,0.000012658779,0.00007431985,0.000025374471,0.000018865483,0.000041353,0.000046865705,0.05010054,0.00013227887,0.9461845,0.0010679634,0.0022901692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001329615,0.000015539485,0.0000506256,0.000019848727,0.000010151486,0.000039946834,0.000023106844,0.17298046,0.00005057199,0.82111746,0.005668809,0.000010112111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003633246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002536935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0133052515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023584666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020540974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044510484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312651608","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4281652","title":"Robust Contracts: A Revealed Preference Approach","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Economics; Business; Computer science; Econometrics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04387325749484304,"score_gpt":0.19513198311064597,"score_spread":0.15125872561580295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312651608","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02443663,0.0016709544,0.9492178,0.0039513316,0.00010195065,0.0001463771,0.0005630733,0.00028083945,0.019631058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85711974,0.0036347625,0.110937275,0.0007868609,0.00082076533,0.00037576337,0.0004328447,0.00021478574,0.02567723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895773,0.00663333,0.00040762388,0.0012210401,0.0014159906,0.00074484467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9385323,0.04889323,0.004742236,0.0043420778,0.002161514,0.0013286194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013174745,0.0017340314,0.0050935773,0.0025509174,0.0014303282,0.0067767277,0.0052779582,0.007729856,0.016687207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054978475,0.0022122145,0.0029800595,0.0037567879,0.004361173,0.013661744,0.0028749602,0.0063236463,0.0013498649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007808346,0.000057864396,0.0002461899,0.00008842827,0.00009805869,0.00011492411,0.00009849385,0.027329912,0.00016022725,0.96452963,0.0013014977,0.0058967196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004681109,0.000041916916,0.00011591537,0.000025503277,0.000046707053,0.000051704286,0.00003768971,0.1399806,0.00008239549,0.8585232,0.0010200022,0.000027579616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037419933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002132827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016687207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038406753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027488687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069675505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312691415","doi":"10.52227/25541.2022","title":"The Service Contracts Model Act: a quarter century and counting - what now?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insurance Regulation","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Service (business); Business; Tertiary sector of the economy; Universal service; Pace; Insurance industry; Financial services; Industrial organization; Finance; Economics; Marketing; Actuarial science; Engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.01689993259603692,"score_gpt":0.19938419901893592,"score_spread":0.182484266422899,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312691415","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009174454,0.052541766,0.005645634,0.7655134,0.0074203103,0.000024963556,0.00033047237,0.00014785222,0.1592011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38137463,0.07790826,0.011611199,0.43749976,0.0117261065,0.00024186906,0.0007678003,0.00032212338,0.07854829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99018854,0.0029214807,0.00039617866,0.0007523956,0.0047900584,0.00095142925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98925203,0.0048256037,0.0009221707,0.0009397542,0.0030893344,0.0009710996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008392933,0.00032944686,0.00037113787,0.0013181211,0.004926347,0.01192017,0.0013916396,0.008447168,0.003625726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024061222,0.00036147254,0.0004821768,0.0028082884,0.010406242,0.011646516,0.002116103,0.0140015725,0.0011627249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001209031,0.000019123181,0.0006070899,0.00003164251,0.0000026079813,0.000029816638,0.00096719986,0.00014621667,0.000052620635,0.86367875,0.10584578,0.02860693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009327782,0.000023373794,0.0014729104,0.00059013726,0.0000074725795,0.000072582,0.0015665374,0.000615715,0.00016628277,0.13328262,0.86215556,0.00003754836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058568146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051593445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058568146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012542192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023399048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11645448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313071863","doi":"10.14296/ac.v3i1.5346","title":"The Plain Meaning Rule and Transitional Provisions in Legislation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Amicus Curiae","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Meaning (existential); Law; Presumption; Political science; Government (linguistics); Original meaning; Rule of law; Psychology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019881099908594237,"score_gpt":0.20756223743954919,"score_spread":0.18768113753095494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313071863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30129832,0.0026372003,0.09587187,0.00875074,0.00038289998,0.00038757126,0.00033603932,0.0001884368,0.59014696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593572,0.00046989712,0.011798808,0.0014953937,0.00011079642,0.00011576481,0.00005675877,0.0000360608,0.026559258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937163,0.0022082655,0.0005295224,0.0011148506,0.0017449652,0.0006861239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918155,0.0038040786,0.0009980606,0.002054567,0.0011692265,0.00015860489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008324875,0.0002178836,0.00028242476,0.0013063729,0.0035245437,0.0051451,0.0019062154,0.00312915,0.005905437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019820511,0.00067603256,0.00061016297,0.0010709863,0.015478166,0.0056038606,0.0030217078,0.0056960415,0.0006990903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007131212,0.000007867791,0.0004098256,0.000011510613,0.0000028627846,0.00009227651,0.0012059524,0.00013532642,0.00022187851,0.99443,0.00027453393,0.0032009198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000552485,0.00020291352,0.009770387,0.00035707382,0.00006657045,0.00048451382,0.0038608352,0.0027116304,0.003248552,0.8484614,0.13067551,0.0001054327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011098705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019699411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011098705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034027596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005609794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044026673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313209906","doi":"10.4000/rdctss.4732","title":"The whistleblower employee in Quebec","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Silence; Loyalty; Duty; Law; Political science; Freedom of expression; Private sector; Business; Sociology; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013693644986896942,"score_gpt":0.2212234106054136,"score_spread":0.20752976561851666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313209906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9333563,0.0031099943,0.00037049997,0.023975363,0.00011425929,0.00004545657,0.0007007415,0.00001596851,0.0383114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739455,0.00072060205,0.00011240079,0.0020694493,0.000020303167,0.000011106253,0.00012780799,0.000006025565,0.022986833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985996,0.00024305025,0.000025246909,0.00010426321,0.00026990994,0.00075803965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963117,0.00083589565,0.00044216093,0.00007506202,0.0011662361,0.0011689682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011943904,0.00012559498,0.0002773823,0.0007323177,0.0073910896,0.0028061871,0.0012790931,0.0019100531,0.0069689974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031809576,0.00019109958,0.00019276804,0.001596929,0.0020817767,0.0007019921,0.0009600701,0.0024860697,0.00031450903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004406533,0.0006701613,0.57022095,0.00035471603,0.0001462382,0.0034248882,0.07419711,0.0028679343,0.0024114859,0.10052224,0.11460343,0.13014011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056174787,0.00010798325,0.82215494,0.0004107547,0.000053044245,0.00029610965,0.075649746,0.0034215604,0.00045346774,0.0019327559,0.09536788,0.000095626994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99887365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06391033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06391033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052991007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46370405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317379369","doi":"10.1086/723810","title":"Pork versus Policy: Experimental Evidence on Majoritarian Bargaining with Real-World Consequences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Politics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; New York University Abu Dhabi; Ohio State University; Tamkeen; Ecolab","keywords":"Economics; Political science; International economics","score_opus":0.1050885986163601,"score_gpt":0.3059834360734402,"score_spread":0.2008948374570801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317379369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.971796,0.00019908677,0.0055970717,0.00068461185,0.00010828208,0.0001842028,0.00011961389,0.000029982742,0.021281108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937808,0.00017960957,0.0031456274,0.00034622138,0.00006059988,0.00034336184,0.0000911613,0.000025629422,0.0020270029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935988,0.004431097,0.00030912494,0.0007341567,0.00064172136,0.0002850401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9289693,0.053812932,0.008983902,0.006386977,0.00069572433,0.0011510968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013883369,0.00073360436,0.0007207409,0.00037811758,0.0007659423,0.0021647762,0.0010989216,0.0014963348,0.01705043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039427962,0.00045320578,0.00034166322,0.00043596126,0.003059406,0.0018448699,0.0011649788,0.001911137,0.0012345156],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07664362,0.12282126,0.07915345,0.0040400084,0.0023681049,0.00082347967,0.009614693,0.035529435,0.12263253,0.34857076,0.011828433,0.18597421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026326943,0.09273428,0.16409351,0.0006978018,0.0013243024,0.0009343993,0.006053349,0.11382791,0.047851454,0.51599145,0.029722322,0.0004423963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023304584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002025647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01705043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046636572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004203876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07342315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318486289","doi":"10.32920/21977021","title":"Are franchisees more prone to employment standards violations than other businesses? Evidence from Ontario, Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Business; Wage; Accommodation; Labour economics; Statistical evidence; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.06902260885850171,"score_gpt":0.256924217466284,"score_spread":0.18790160860778232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318486289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96400845,0.0023362932,0.0002906534,0.0038725594,0.000058143876,0.00006672385,0.015832527,0.000014804511,0.013519701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895587,0.0013848777,0.00011223673,0.00033996406,0.000018410052,0.000017592662,0.004673412,0.000010061051,0.003884684],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590164,0.00048291954,0.00030753427,0.0005137824,0.0015697874,0.001224275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9665586,0.0035415695,0.012357685,0.0013680902,0.011135852,0.005038349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025331527,0.00030648115,0.00054886495,0.0020842596,0.0036241366,0.0021508755,0.001717683,0.00067435694,0.005721527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012030356,0.00047902047,0.0006314531,0.0068657477,0.0014171643,0.00081985234,0.0012791204,0.0010925021,0.00051667646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086181106,0.00003428306,0.9849029,0.00007237948,0.00008356959,0.00011612806,0.0019651765,0.00012433418,0.000070496244,0.00048758104,0.0074480935,0.004608893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000871143,0.000009918488,0.99362,0.000070594804,0.00002579795,0.000024381116,0.0027020052,0.00018786128,0.000029798532,0.000050113278,0.0032599538,0.000010780278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99736744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02276141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02276141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029680992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16514635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318486632","doi":"10.32920/21977021.v1","title":"Are franchisees more prone to employment standards violations than other businesses? Evidence from Ontario, Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Wage; Business; Accommodation; Labour economics; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.06902260885850171,"score_gpt":0.256924217466284,"score_spread":0.18790160860778232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318486632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96400845,0.0023362932,0.0002906534,0.0038725594,0.000058143876,0.00006672385,0.015832527,0.000014804511,0.013519701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895587,0.0013848777,0.00011223673,0.00033996406,0.000018410052,0.000017592662,0.004673412,0.000010061051,0.003884684],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590164,0.00048291954,0.00030753427,0.0005137824,0.0015697874,0.001224275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9665586,0.0035415695,0.012357685,0.0013680902,0.011135852,0.005038349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025331527,0.00030648115,0.00054886495,0.0020842596,0.0036241366,0.0021508755,0.001717683,0.00067435694,0.005721527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012030356,0.00047902047,0.0006314531,0.0068657477,0.0014171643,0.00081985234,0.0012791204,0.0010925021,0.00051667646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086181106,0.00003428306,0.9849029,0.00007237948,0.00008356959,0.00011612806,0.0019651765,0.00012433418,0.000070496244,0.00048758104,0.0074480935,0.004608893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000871143,0.000009918488,0.99362,0.000070594804,0.00002579795,0.000024381116,0.0027020052,0.00018786128,0.000029798532,0.000050113278,0.0032599538,0.000010780278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99736744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02276141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02276141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029680992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16514635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320487861","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4354130","title":"Can Better Judicial Systems Prevent Crime?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Business; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.019065777918013675,"score_gpt":0.21588030206170036,"score_spread":0.1968145241436867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320487861","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17924748,0.00802754,0.017805124,0.57118845,0.0035807993,0.00027618848,0.0013359209,0.00053402083,0.21800448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537577,0.0023261826,0.0040106946,0.026488636,0.002737543,0.00011580322,0.00021161165,0.00008005565,0.010271755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890519,0.0052315844,0.00042830757,0.0010998847,0.0013747615,0.002813556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9351876,0.026167255,0.016432388,0.0071010212,0.008733002,0.006378765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012781568,0.00047066357,0.0010289777,0.0023820105,0.0027913898,0.007615111,0.0021132645,0.0072545554,0.039873645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0941811,0.00048335677,0.0006373443,0.0014099268,0.00565054,0.0078106434,0.0031048304,0.0051751644,0.0038648925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026569166,0.001277812,0.028200869,0.00061694946,0.00023920518,0.0002734877,0.0016430959,0.0052350084,0.00078694744,0.73641795,0.13664335,0.088399604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006747565,0.00046400772,0.06710475,0.0010057116,0.00029522012,0.00028354512,0.0037180756,0.0054116463,0.0014925372,0.8189427,0.10049018,0.000116877505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067507615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01349389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039873645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031562122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011551598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1333906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320737067","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4355773","title":"Agendas, Decisions, and Autonomy: How Government Lawyers Shape Judicial Behavior","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.026899129645790363,"score_gpt":0.22375189706764131,"score_spread":0.19685276742185095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320737067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68862903,0.0008855719,0.009307832,0.03299509,0.0001390619,0.000043989778,0.00018439548,0.000051698837,0.26776326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961295,0.00010382642,0.0005397368,0.0005735913,0.000030315281,0.000011392064,0.000023836164,0.000024665478,0.0025632242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944891,0.0033994801,0.000119074684,0.0005329767,0.00055754127,0.00090186286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722658,0.018308166,0.003071354,0.0014273671,0.0015298598,0.0033975835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071782176,0.00014558161,0.00036043522,0.0010586699,0.0032815477,0.0096653495,0.00075752387,0.0030756565,0.014435736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035276476,0.00035508198,0.00027860387,0.0013872933,0.0063368133,0.0047000335,0.002494457,0.0030933716,0.0013766434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050537137,0.0005104321,0.08910451,0.000105173305,0.000089690766,0.0004222467,0.0380678,0.0026926522,0.0020130419,0.79537904,0.016412623,0.05469749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019170117,0.00011088985,0.07317862,0.00011935905,0.00007005838,0.00010325765,0.024521599,0.0051895124,0.0007153046,0.8476411,0.04808955,0.00006911294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061935917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0116280215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014435736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025735914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003323791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04829234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320899658","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4357456","title":"Alignment between Compensation-Contracting and Value-Relevance Roles of Revenues","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Value (mathematics); Compensation (psychology); Revenue; Business; Industrial organization; Law and economics; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Accounting; Law; Social psychology; Machine learning","score_opus":0.021244043804961633,"score_gpt":0.2309556386601173,"score_spread":0.20971159485515567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320899658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4920821,0.001604164,0.08377918,0.00515463,0.00019997385,0.00030654526,0.00033872089,0.0002552569,0.41627935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99086845,0.00013579648,0.00426045,0.00010972641,0.00006615465,0.000029182776,0.000053831176,0.000054857108,0.0044216537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890159,0.0046972353,0.00067841745,0.001223271,0.0026719025,0.0017134163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94877636,0.032428842,0.003981431,0.0035316474,0.006885249,0.0043964763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013894328,0.0004610533,0.00073168706,0.0022971118,0.0019456558,0.010928387,0.001413933,0.0021910581,0.01702823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066123895,0.0005574384,0.0005768973,0.0013141386,0.003350323,0.00796892,0.0020927805,0.00320054,0.0019400996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026398702,0.00024216261,0.01110037,0.00013135576,0.00002854324,0.00009154592,0.0014971207,0.0018712333,0.0050534047,0.9386859,0.0019338969,0.039100457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020728444,0.00036094812,0.10128502,0.0002330815,0.000072784445,0.00046300906,0.0033206576,0.025668304,0.009587922,0.8400785,0.018610556,0.00011199853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011545472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014672518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01702823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003165806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037230651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07348114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321074113","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4355553","title":"Honesty Pledges: the Effects of Involvement and Identification Over Time","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Identification (biology); Psychology; Social psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.010202609408581934,"score_gpt":0.20054602150452985,"score_spread":0.1903434120959479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321074113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97774386,0.00078794605,0.0023710032,0.0047674556,0.000131622,0.00009196946,0.00032084793,0.00004447361,0.01374087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943678,0.00015339005,0.00019449212,0.0001751776,0.00006888348,0.000025401063,0.00013962394,0.00001323427,0.004861967],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905386,0.004901036,0.00062236073,0.0014155498,0.00089631777,0.0016260607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5482042,0.33832353,0.07678751,0.015532149,0.0065557524,0.014596879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023358949,0.00034794502,0.0010200323,0.0012670959,0.0025573545,0.005621881,0.0021869952,0.005029354,0.030848585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19962882,0.0006282069,0.00079032226,0.0012601785,0.002699553,0.007354222,0.0041261837,0.0072025107,0.002896573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0067659137,0.0046022516,0.901857,0.00015405979,0.0004871655,0.0011914035,0.0066006617,0.0041001765,0.0006891816,0.017782087,0.0043035545,0.051466566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054725754,0.0023163836,0.9128823,0.00025477415,0.0006697742,0.0008910772,0.014814594,0.016174622,0.0016324597,0.043642666,0.0059861196,0.00018805872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042532375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042316136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030848585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008861468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016438492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123535454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323340185","doi":"10.7202/1096886ar","title":"Interprétation d’un contrat d’intérêt public : illustration à l’aide du Code de soumission du Bureau des soumissions déposées du Québec","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Soul; Theology","score_opus":0.029827075942451552,"score_gpt":0.21618743806009472,"score_spread":0.18636036211764317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323340185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060577977,0.0020989755,0.032715168,0.03851398,0.00038927508,0.00006225426,0.00031362945,0.00010586331,0.86522293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8819745,0.000977622,0.0075105997,0.001982942,0.00012511795,0.00006315389,0.000101235695,0.00008017504,0.10718458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998005,0.00087901636,0.000029656563,0.00015445848,0.00052255066,0.0004094583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972109,0.001302278,0.00012362316,0.00023261411,0.0010141329,0.00011642907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018732713,0.0004413968,0.00035094641,0.0015066895,0.0072133415,0.00827274,0.0013847346,0.0037380492,0.014050218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004192528,0.0002535211,0.0006159026,0.0019507284,0.011393445,0.0026884854,0.002565961,0.003265203,0.0008105537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009370258,0.000004728804,0.00039074803,0.000017279226,0.0000029240537,0.00026155912,0.006909954,0.0003637375,0.000110653666,0.98448217,0.0047321497,0.0027147366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055320033,0.00002444108,0.007357503,0.000410569,0.00005175904,0.0004976468,0.029135173,0.014997344,0.0010952537,0.4970471,0.44925964,0.000068316076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7374905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7530085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26250952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034135103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020078063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.528111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323527191","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4372925","title":"Honesty Pledges: The Effects of Involvement and Identification Over Time","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Identification (biology); Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.010202609408581934,"score_gpt":0.20054602150452985,"score_spread":0.1903434120959479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323527191","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97774386,0.00078794605,0.0023710032,0.0047674556,0.000131622,0.00009196946,0.00032084793,0.00004447361,0.01374087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943678,0.00015339005,0.00019449212,0.0001751776,0.00006888348,0.000025401063,0.00013962394,0.00001323427,0.004861967],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905386,0.004901036,0.00062236073,0.0014155498,0.00089631777,0.0016260607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5482042,0.33832353,0.07678751,0.015532149,0.0065557524,0.014596879],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023358949,0.00034794502,0.0010200323,0.0012670959,0.0025573545,0.005621881,0.0021869952,0.005029354,0.030848585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19962882,0.0006282069,0.00079032226,0.0012601785,0.002699553,0.007354222,0.0041261837,0.0072025107,0.002896573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0067659137,0.0046022516,0.901857,0.00015405979,0.0004871655,0.0011914035,0.0066006617,0.0041001765,0.0006891816,0.017782087,0.0043035545,0.051466566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054725754,0.0023163836,0.9128823,0.00025477415,0.0006697742,0.0008910772,0.014814594,0.016174622,0.0016324597,0.043642666,0.0059861196,0.00018805872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042532375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042316136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030848585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008861468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016438492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123535454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323660913","doi":"10.33137/ic.v15i.40373","title":"Judging in the New Millennium","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Italian Canadiana","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Millennium Development Goals; Political science; Poverty; Law","score_opus":0.035805237937424406,"score_gpt":0.2104614935980282,"score_spread":0.1746562556606038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323660913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005775253,0.017319636,0.002078067,0.26989686,0.010428928,0.000036134195,0.00040191857,0.00009304154,0.6939702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61914694,0.029733462,0.005839339,0.08406894,0.010057397,0.00009710042,0.0008378259,0.00027297568,0.24994601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912407,0.0022988913,0.00026405262,0.0009873934,0.004180225,0.001028731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868063,0.0024236254,0.0005370002,0.0010938752,0.0064010015,0.0027382476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005997353,0.00035333788,0.00056535786,0.0015385207,0.007273051,0.011762718,0.0010925137,0.0026320734,0.014167783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026552306,0.0001655964,0.00023669009,0.0015989671,0.010531352,0.004835801,0.002745001,0.0051969974,0.0023400844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012711366,0.000009517033,0.0014461724,0.000055822424,0.000009447402,0.00012745908,0.0017514012,0.0001167907,0.000079512065,0.5155145,0.4357702,0.04510639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038771755,0.000005075333,0.0013489876,0.00020381343,0.00000382109,0.000046037134,0.001965114,0.00007830837,0.000047677637,0.08822228,0.9080579,0.000017005546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11842397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18013634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11842397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0111950515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019294826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23546934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4353072691","doi":"10.1007/s42001-023-00202-1","title":"Incorporating machine learning in dispute resolution and settlement process for financial fraud","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational Social Science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Enforcement; Harm; Settlement (finance); Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Business; Public relations; Finance; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.035965363254188684,"score_gpt":0.2766830211691504,"score_spread":0.2407176579149617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4353072691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52785295,0.0009835976,0.45887312,0.005360812,0.00037521098,0.0001648,0.00018256332,0.00040394356,0.0058030435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98497343,0.00009938579,0.013002658,0.00013569614,0.000099871875,0.000031994667,0.00006482736,0.000015298185,0.0015768576],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981142,0.0009915289,0.00010709487,0.00030941502,0.00019096641,0.0002868222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96809083,0.026961539,0.0015356882,0.0008080724,0.0018088185,0.00079496345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007869856,0.00043590824,0.0015175873,0.0015319451,0.0012618023,0.0022650547,0.0027045016,0.0036024356,0.004531328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0390259,0.00063195167,0.000840766,0.00092706375,0.0012983889,0.0050243908,0.0016376496,0.0031927456,0.00041330667],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026080327,0.00059173984,0.00889522,0.000054885437,0.00007067756,0.000109446664,0.00017589286,0.9134764,0.00024601724,0.024254642,0.0013102131,0.050554037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050711583,0.000008202794,0.00016480591,0.0000024296417,0.0000046440514,0.0000042856223,0.000007015278,0.99506843,0.000041811214,0.004648325,0.00004188233,0.0000030552346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013184917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013308488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013184917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002556952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027896466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041620255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361195810","doi":"10.1162/rest_a_01311","title":"Selecting Top Bureaucrats: Admission Exams and Performance in Brazil","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economics and Statistics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Civil service; Variation (astronomy); Service (business); Selection (genetic algorithm); State (computer science); Demographic economics; Public service; Public administration; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Microeconomics; Marketing; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03529386848127275,"score_gpt":0.256988520628922,"score_spread":0.22169465214764927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361195810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99406564,0.0005002937,0.00022326535,0.00068764173,0.000010741191,0.000015322656,0.0003440377,0.0000066300518,0.004146327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995314,0.00009029357,0.00003723516,0.000014473682,0.000006013572,0.0000016933161,0.00008995853,0.0000013553648,0.00022770051],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997787,0.0006970974,0.00016860961,0.00028514088,0.00060952286,0.00045264605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755341,0.007081985,0.009221673,0.000714849,0.004104604,0.0033428501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032512455,0.0001622683,0.00038016497,0.0022518153,0.00077203405,0.0014635692,0.00046073893,0.00033190078,0.0027670627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027091786,0.0001589119,0.0002316555,0.0027762635,0.00094958657,0.00038043107,0.0010439955,0.0005790251,0.00034796476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003105649,0.00003759183,0.9906888,0.00003295985,0.000027373713,0.000088940695,0.0009093589,0.00022360946,0.00012853861,0.0010203784,0.00062031636,0.006191166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005839497,0.00003214341,0.99572563,0.00005894158,0.000022536586,0.0000620794,0.0012829197,0.00082038296,0.00011635727,0.0005848463,0.0012819988,0.0000064823344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08439696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12672275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08439696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018145589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017199961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16781145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4364351998","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2023.2184459","title":"Referee Abuse, Intention to Quit, and Well-Being","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.055701690815893566,"score_gpt":0.29871447272061113,"score_spread":0.24301278190471756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4364351998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979615,0.0002493979,0.00009315241,0.00016548665,0.0000040841437,0.000009842726,0.00010343029,0.0000033178405,0.0014098968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99936527,0.0000970967,0.00005029846,0.000028131666,0.000004568404,0.0000060248444,0.00008092611,6.9264337e-7,0.00036710722],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982607,0.00064599584,0.00014065168,0.00015522762,0.0005342547,0.00026323472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909065,0.0021783793,0.0041928054,0.00040714443,0.0008028695,0.0015122498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020883807,0.00014937192,0.00029992327,0.0010719002,0.00078684866,0.0011853628,0.000343557,0.0005596736,0.004104864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011923079,0.00011823739,0.00041508896,0.0010095523,0.0005843493,0.000355149,0.0006568751,0.0006909931,0.0003168094],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020220114,0.00008412162,0.99496067,0.000012282273,0.000043595508,0.000038813974,0.00062516145,0.000042499443,0.00006152269,0.000059294744,0.00012109343,0.0039306274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.3887356e-7,0.00003330273,0.99906176,0.000008151548,0.000009723903,0.000034524834,0.00065442536,0.00004303784,0.000013557705,0.000018037099,0.000120546494,0.000002415354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038788278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056720592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038788278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070592004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075346703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07712501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W43647396","doi":"","title":"Fullowka v. Pinkerton’s of Canada Ltd. and the Material-Contribution Test for Factual Causation in Negligence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Duty of care; Duty; Supreme court; Test (biology); Law; Liability; Psychology; Political science; Tort","score_opus":0.012886791048666912,"score_gpt":0.1837056010922256,"score_spread":0.1708188100435587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W43647396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06281184,0.010661451,0.011877203,0.25149918,0.0016910405,0.00032868402,0.0019422638,0.00013757346,0.65905076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8056397,0.0035351892,0.005808213,0.08795381,0.0005804367,0.00016392296,0.00043611685,0.000059478905,0.09582314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886692,0.0013672438,0.00048385293,0.001107062,0.005509052,0.0028636463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916847,0.0043825773,0.00040998182,0.00050718035,0.0023184305,0.0006972146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007496338,0.00049725664,0.0007862374,0.0019803047,0.011709906,0.0058555095,0.002820033,0.014381091,0.00694591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027310735,0.0007942152,0.0009183847,0.0018232239,0.011663561,0.0034238396,0.0020571367,0.008450044,0.0007957557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031174965,0.000011569275,0.0011242452,0.000030245854,0.000014693016,0.00044431566,0.0009458016,0.00023123287,0.00014841503,0.95817834,0.03547913,0.0033609055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017445169,0.000057678197,0.010288866,0.00057048403,0.000106867104,0.00042569428,0.0016380133,0.002593302,0.0013933134,0.7055306,0.27699804,0.00022266604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83299494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89246094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16700506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029745929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04945329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33597714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366959318","doi":"10.46692/9781529219029.004","title":"Pandemic Pop-Ups and the Performance of Legality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"NSW Department of Planning,Industry and Environment","keywords":"Principle of legality; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Law; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.029937484450675633,"score_gpt":0.20970473289659977,"score_spread":0.17976724844592415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366959318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27449152,0.002584489,0.004424325,0.044836484,0.0002435875,0.00009342637,0.00011733893,0.0000590123,0.67314976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943684,0.0003420978,0.0003662284,0.0006818903,0.00004476432,0.000019226218,0.000021136379,0.000015149836,0.004141139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912794,0.004566405,0.0002457193,0.00091929134,0.0013167091,0.0016724376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759237,0.011405792,0.0050762263,0.0015827491,0.0030411077,0.0029704578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008159621,0.0002867994,0.000316704,0.0014127748,0.01282285,0.012087488,0.0015738583,0.0026828158,0.01183191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02478428,0.00029747054,0.0003021945,0.0016262563,0.06622805,0.009135818,0.013183191,0.0049759196,0.0005663605],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027740964,0.000051430296,0.0089129405,0.00011040209,0.0000099865465,0.00041588157,0.14492436,0.0004162897,0.00015987224,0.8293194,0.0045179636,0.01113372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030741838,0.00007835028,0.03543247,0.0007140405,0.000026186055,0.00047857605,0.2741808,0.0011273604,0.00071822084,0.4143602,0.2727446,0.00010854232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037897356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045476478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037897356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016573908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010686914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12025267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377992404","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_369","title":"Truth and Ethics in Labor-Management Negotiations: The Accounting Information Behind the Scenes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Accounting; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04797088851930785,"score_gpt":0.22194155434231388,"score_spread":0.17397066582300602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377992404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011364607,0.013056155,0.021494804,0.14239089,0.0011297177,0.00003705475,0.00010356546,0.00004950611,0.8103737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86533415,0.0058651883,0.0068891686,0.011251742,0.0020710973,0.00010317436,0.000077305725,0.00014962358,0.10825872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946525,0.0033479184,0.00012523202,0.00033369957,0.0010793323,0.0004612227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98965144,0.0085028615,0.0003622031,0.00053479685,0.00067345717,0.00027534182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006453191,0.00041526256,0.0005379005,0.0009914445,0.005014094,0.011832607,0.0010726685,0.0057255593,0.008440574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018565288,0.00041479195,0.00027848143,0.0012240759,0.02546922,0.014305622,0.00203537,0.0075599914,0.0011382684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032742987,0.000003488266,0.000024223296,0.0000055126234,6.547348e-7,0.000009640482,0.00072582875,0.00007501841,0.000012785809,0.9925465,0.004286586,0.002306628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020234866,0.0000015890951,0.000058446556,0.00003541057,8.92127e-7,0.000007767921,0.00043571906,0.00023288922,0.00003616243,0.9808441,0.018341681,0.0000033711026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004652199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059771985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011832607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052980436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005591733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038440228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382678100","doi":"10.1093/jla/laad001","title":"Learning in Standard-Form Contracts: Theory and Evidence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Analysis","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Warranty; Sample (material); Term (time); Opportunity cost; Business; Actuarial science; Economics; Marketing; Microeconomics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0208236416800406,"score_gpt":0.22976165081931577,"score_spread":0.20893800913927515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382678100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8554218,0.02343224,0.036603846,0.015710386,0.0002531086,0.00036191705,0.0006515787,0.00010476727,0.0674603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911765,0.0036989828,0.0033521645,0.000669608,0.00015077039,0.000060326933,0.00019003409,0.000012304564,0.00068932294],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97464037,0.012274762,0.0018439986,0.0038884552,0.00629613,0.0010562782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.32991892,0.5701083,0.061342698,0.018716631,0.017239567,0.002673848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041728027,0.00077492744,0.0015269346,0.005570432,0.0018000244,0.005676154,0.003807539,0.0037330214,0.017830031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20369923,0.00077179325,0.0011978311,0.005252751,0.014666816,0.011441178,0.0029169756,0.004235218,0.0011335998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017777197,0.0032336405,0.518784,0.0033366038,0.0013152673,0.0015748237,0.00980894,0.015624172,0.00039752555,0.23402786,0.0045971083,0.20552236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009335428,0.0016269285,0.33030066,0.0040619117,0.000983248,0.0014016402,0.015042569,0.07427538,0.0019792572,0.5449173,0.024050498,0.00042712566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007735136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00357723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041728027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034036054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022992548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22068155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382683261","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2023.05.028","title":"An experimental exploration of reasonable doubt","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reasonable doubt; Jury; Convict; Jury instructions; Psychology; Law; Economics; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.05452700073470054,"score_gpt":0.2646717945310258,"score_spread":0.21014479379632525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382683261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84735656,0.0009777296,0.02078407,0.010827869,0.0005800498,0.0006971733,0.0008247587,0.0001609666,0.117790796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99296993,0.0002065723,0.0029367586,0.0006711981,0.00010466768,0.0003099817,0.00011108968,0.000034991837,0.0026548817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946532,0.0034257572,0.00032000436,0.00057040254,0.0008311624,0.00019936505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8368191,0.13753197,0.008505954,0.013644563,0.0022785277,0.001219857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009808043,0.00062931905,0.0007164099,0.0007350837,0.0012647731,0.0024676484,0.001827369,0.00245501,0.030766789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10120572,0.00049513817,0.0003944908,0.00068464683,0.0051675667,0.0057744044,0.0020856475,0.002997575,0.001075862],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010876483,0.015625002,0.010077269,0.0011361855,0.00023701951,0.0005557651,0.0085358685,0.0028087718,0.016783096,0.8781399,0.007838962,0.047385667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005607732,0.007916263,0.009347213,0.00024248849,0.0003134795,0.0007986442,0.0027744563,0.018362543,0.0064631356,0.9333017,0.014759063,0.000113430964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006442739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004307359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030766789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008210439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011703578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10292512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383098912","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4499355","title":"Claim Reserving via Inverse Probability Weighting: A Micro-Level Chain-Ladder Method","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Inverse; Weighting; Chain (unit); Inverse probability weighting; Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Statistics; Physics; Geometry; Acoustics","score_opus":0.05200007819078757,"score_gpt":0.2534646355157163,"score_spread":0.20146455732492874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383098912","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066046156,0.000064080356,0.99131763,0.00011326384,0.00001730654,0.000062415325,0.000040725703,0.0001683654,0.0016115288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30852032,0.00030649803,0.67835736,0.00014535619,0.00013699978,0.00030371087,0.00025841262,0.00022435063,0.011746901],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970222,0.0013750003,0.00015896061,0.0004563548,0.0006984476,0.00028906134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986379,0.008827621,0.0007502007,0.0023512656,0.0011474622,0.00054442865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006739449,0.0006633148,0.0020101795,0.0024649608,0.0009869246,0.0024243388,0.0034972865,0.002590537,0.018906482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016757049,0.0012578089,0.0014756444,0.0032080503,0.001539287,0.0053128605,0.0028432303,0.0026416844,0.0027633077],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040331393,0.00061358925,0.0033317413,0.00024150385,0.00018076628,0.00025223824,0.00033340583,0.44202435,0.0032050915,0.28533405,0.0047655995,0.25931433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020861098,0.000025841091,0.00013494452,0.000011678247,0.000015559765,0.000021753285,0.00001094952,0.9559005,0.0002680679,0.04305461,0.0005255958,0.00000966159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036906765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044353125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018906482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010072169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025303795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063248456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383269580","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4488404","title":"Data Privacy in Pricing: Estimation Bias and Implications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Estimation; Information privacy; Econometrics; Computer science; Business; Internet privacy; Economics","score_opus":0.08035566932980023,"score_gpt":0.27581472838258525,"score_spread":0.19545905905278502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383269580","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18786828,0.01313598,0.6352572,0.13458158,0.001325034,0.00045118897,0.0008553472,0.00060190033,0.025923492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93819135,0.0029101681,0.048322916,0.005527473,0.0018992956,0.000119018616,0.00020047715,0.0001944615,0.0026348745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90657574,0.068172105,0.0046988362,0.008424031,0.010228612,0.0019006653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.16521221,0.766329,0.022255095,0.033249136,0.012017602,0.0009369731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16020365,0.00085424713,0.001932304,0.0027147788,0.002009315,0.009106311,0.0037744865,0.00465376,0.0060901623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6609521,0.001029161,0.0016163206,0.0049307626,0.008808182,0.014420034,0.0038393855,0.0071003474,0.00071692554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012936805,0.0005521543,0.15437022,0.0006097868,0.0013484182,0.0014337905,0.0035488093,0.023868108,0.00074183196,0.62554765,0.015048167,0.17163743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004503009,0.00018560809,0.017439825,0.0006619894,0.00082662475,0.0014586,0.0012605916,0.14802732,0.0035625251,0.81968254,0.0063028648,0.00014122971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007687899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005323674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16020365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029994792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033605702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.847248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383758966","doi":"10.56687/9781529219029-007","title":"Pandemic Pop-Ups and the Performance of Legality","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Bristol University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"NSW Department of Planning,Industry and Environment","keywords":"Principle of legality; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.03509356308316482,"score_gpt":0.17415714521465128,"score_spread":0.13906358213148645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383758966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023682661,0.0024781076,0.00095575873,0.016855037,0.00026092248,0.000019567675,0.000034494577,0.000026523709,0.9556869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.808152,0.002757303,0.00057181367,0.0033907897,0.00031449425,0.000040329265,0.000050261282,0.00005990207,0.18466315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976647,0.00084967836,0.00004008526,0.00020718371,0.00053242093,0.00070594886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724907,0.0011165724,0.00028126084,0.00031527126,0.0005930348,0.00044477716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029720624,0.00022425296,0.0002377343,0.0008800413,0.0076629473,0.008166234,0.0008990492,0.002398591,0.011463176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008048489,0.00028375373,0.00021275382,0.0009511658,0.024862615,0.0054335333,0.004140408,0.0043816376,0.001066481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038246967,0.000008597684,0.00033626406,0.000009814904,0.0000012834633,0.00006918162,0.004422766,0.00015373724,0.000036071517,0.97692466,0.012327491,0.0057062767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015460157,0.0000364426,0.0049476866,0.00026009718,0.0000071544837,0.00023011578,0.0100337,0.00085063593,0.00030322635,0.4405748,0.5426998,0.000040759445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036896836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057083223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036896836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010339262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008431411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075016916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384160076","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4509404","title":"Favor Exchange: An Experiment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04838984997280017,"score_gpt":0.25974264648001244,"score_spread":0.21135279650721228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384160076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9546939,0.00036823485,0.0032988188,0.0036506779,0.0010792052,0.0018286208,0.0012830143,0.00019778524,0.03359978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96479344,0.0002256394,0.0036836094,0.0031340122,0.00082739734,0.0018349331,0.0009701604,0.00009742333,0.024433387],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957969,0.0018717936,0.000311135,0.0008286045,0.00070720963,0.00048433445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9424902,0.04027185,0.004336763,0.007644573,0.0011188692,0.00413777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010321614,0.0012222072,0.001898348,0.0006411252,0.0030344387,0.0043714796,0.0024287135,0.007305682,0.065472245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033971403,0.0010607666,0.000744953,0.0006179823,0.0028993618,0.0055404454,0.0024578085,0.0069514774,0.010065778],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.29004326,0.35533842,0.032548487,0.0025749686,0.0013790742,0.0021795104,0.0077625485,0.005649081,0.038890984,0.11091153,0.061455,0.09126704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.28831708,0.15074092,0.07311233,0.00046596007,0.002753968,0.002684497,0.0060933796,0.04808642,0.019275818,0.312848,0.09473423,0.0008874107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009957203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077550625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065472245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006655945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015655578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2190265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385234012","doi":"10.1017/beq.2023.15","title":"Ethics for Capitalists: A Systematic Approach to Business Ethics, Competition, and Market Failure, by Joseph Heath. Altona, MB: FriesenPress, 2023. 276 pp.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Business ethics; Competition (biology); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Economics; Political science; Management; Philosophy; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.061118347589709486,"score_gpt":0.25910540635670765,"score_spread":0.19798705876699815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385234012","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009648953,0.625376,0.0061262003,0.31540567,0.005482349,0.00008781521,0.00020178448,0.00013141353,0.04622392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07880927,0.6512371,0.025060033,0.050174177,0.015754106,0.0006329139,0.0004921543,0.00039470996,0.17744555],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667656,0.0017966011,0.0001850948,0.0002004215,0.0009784243,0.0001628957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99287075,0.004635588,0.0004867396,0.00022160033,0.0011804845,0.00060481916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007311397,0.0010019839,0.00058693904,0.0028166948,0.0025069856,0.005513142,0.0010349,0.0032687197,0.005281171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012198504,0.0007457123,0.0003145351,0.0025144587,0.009538586,0.007409941,0.0028879216,0.0051732054,0.0023818882],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010368161,0.00002273001,0.00046987674,0.00030836833,0.000009149382,0.00006343872,0.0037651993,0.00016227631,0.00009279192,0.07382436,0.833678,0.08759341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007800339,0.000011050658,0.0022624715,0.0021031783,0.000006205743,0.00020823759,0.0030571094,0.00028870674,0.00008214507,0.09634713,0.89560527,0.00002062994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019699354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04119017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019699354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062852483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012062925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045602918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385367308","doi":"10.59962/9780774866866-009","title":"Private Risk Assessment Instruments and Artificial Intelligence in Canada’s Criminal Justice System","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Criminology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.027807992307655884,"score_gpt":0.18140248801986408,"score_spread":0.1535944957122082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385367308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0755507,0.019089788,0.034268577,0.14163001,0.00079803175,0.00018256462,0.0026694173,0.0005989101,0.72521204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8160096,0.006953121,0.02075099,0.0039237076,0.00028773566,0.00005929618,0.00076985906,0.0001469065,0.15109876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953903,0.0009653206,0.00014407968,0.00028641123,0.0024553542,0.0007586505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99179333,0.0031415739,0.00023480634,0.00036938427,0.003977632,0.00048320653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041987654,0.000560908,0.00047514154,0.0031290012,0.006012728,0.014045873,0.0015306008,0.0026387535,0.0058216075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016339753,0.0004325459,0.00035065867,0.0045535215,0.0060895775,0.0031387587,0.0011573132,0.003012223,0.00047980924],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031482035,0.000038095084,0.005010786,0.000050258088,0.000018875131,0.00007984466,0.0019083698,0.011794595,0.00009066934,0.7417189,0.09408066,0.14517742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025508258,0.000031366773,0.017470893,0.00055530114,0.000049782873,0.00007543395,0.0038516892,0.05108161,0.00065881026,0.45572287,0.4703102,0.00016646137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97498804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9856491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105015315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.105015315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1364916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.761943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385508924","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3781","title":"Far Beyond Baker: Heuristics and the Inadequacy of the Reasonable Apprehension of Bias Analysis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Subconscious; Apprehension; Prejudice (legal term); Cognitive bias; Objectivity (philosophy); Psychology; Disadvantaged; Social psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026668197763702967,"score_gpt":0.19818918404369162,"score_spread":0.17152098627998866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385508924","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018657288,0.04953899,0.116791286,0.7315835,0.0053677084,0.0001890614,0.00018752071,0.00024773384,0.07743696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7253157,0.017161028,0.09506135,0.1467099,0.008151389,0.00058505725,0.00013201528,0.00037851714,0.006505098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8910803,0.0841415,0.0036234194,0.0063626175,0.012905975,0.001886065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74281377,0.22952096,0.0057124766,0.009252553,0.010410507,0.0022896738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11249531,0.0011450098,0.0021679746,0.009084896,0.008315605,0.015597363,0.0038436828,0.009613523,0.0025619406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16604254,0.0009907519,0.0021409062,0.0040375195,0.11199841,0.029732713,0.0071574426,0.024749054,0.00065515755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026183601,0.0000095386185,0.00046585218,0.00010900319,0.0000362695,0.0000833267,0.0026076748,0.00021930516,0.00003383037,0.9747447,0.010904437,0.01076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011109303,0.0000055061373,0.000117569885,0.00018760185,0.0000071144777,0.00006653242,0.0006285077,0.00042189166,0.000051174044,0.98608124,0.012406409,0.000015326495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007870292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046948637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11249531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010539648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008678566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5949392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518165","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1082","title":"Book Notes: Multi-Party Litigation: The Strategic Context, by Wayne V. McIntosh &amp; Cynthia L. Cates","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0892676094355498,"score_gpt":0.2302374792348515,"score_spread":0.1409698697993017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020867528,0.052118734,0.0012342948,0.43851402,0.005753294,0.00006992583,0.0010074078,0.00009112414,0.49912447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051452134,0.046734698,0.0016009494,0.22022854,0.009235827,0.00020425685,0.0005748536,0.0001522681,0.66981655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884254,0.00021162823,0.000055415876,0.00015225008,0.00058095757,0.000157241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555296,0.0031600937,0.0001792306,0.000112569316,0.00079497043,0.00020020186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014826447,0.00069930486,0.00037684725,0.0015148296,0.006260067,0.0070296763,0.0020992064,0.016987411,0.032950442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006672376,0.0006148155,0.00046546434,0.0021886316,0.0035534326,0.0060821297,0.0011575839,0.0064303596,0.0063025067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031506324,0.0000106554235,0.0001248598,0.000023088372,0.0000012939248,0.000036174944,0.0001514514,0.00005852714,0.000024482979,0.05642493,0.939134,0.004007366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015048087,0.000016642836,0.0016526342,0.00032404703,0.000009186928,0.00011609672,0.00078142155,0.00024810564,0.00020237533,0.044684984,0.95191973,0.000029729617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.106371686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.280659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106371686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005875518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008823607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21150512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518191","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2829","title":"Philosophical Foundations of Contract Law, by Gregory Klass, George Letsas &amp; Prince Saprai, eds","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Philosophy; Law; Economics; Theology; Law and economics; Political science; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.059644654392656614,"score_gpt":0.2536348559869204,"score_spread":0.1939902015942638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518191","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011818644,0.69456905,0.008256305,0.19229048,0.004224997,0.000020415966,0.00018196447,0.000066634624,0.09920829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10951948,0.7060791,0.014262375,0.033042394,0.015039026,0.00014373875,0.00031781205,0.00018393851,0.12141207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856395,0.00046758086,0.00008566506,0.0001682033,0.00062493974,0.000089687295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974252,0.0016248297,0.00019063558,0.00013096507,0.00041702486,0.00021138659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035514054,0.0008470148,0.00063975697,0.0022182558,0.002548356,0.009075302,0.001307652,0.0050462903,0.008440517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00713255,0.00090086414,0.00046747798,0.0035218704,0.012036681,0.010932893,0.0018738883,0.006457763,0.0024617761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011699248,0.00002768033,0.00015104453,0.0001661501,0.0000069062175,0.000024407824,0.0009452604,0.0002816509,0.000050027662,0.71250826,0.25504574,0.03078108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007627709,0.0000046287473,0.00050616974,0.00045100716,0.0000047807966,0.000094614974,0.0007438319,0.00032721367,0.000045165816,0.5107641,0.48704088,0.000009966907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013565262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018971251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013565262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006498159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008205754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04714763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385523442","doi":"10.59962/9780774832557","title":"War-Torn Exchanges","year":2016,"lang":"it","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.022456584368605054,"score_gpt":0.16646740808112054,"score_spread":0.14401082371251547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385523442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024650737,0.02140939,0.0003097343,0.04728128,0.008435634,0.000023042725,0.00011105481,0.00009011075,0.9198747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021717703,0.008809024,0.000119141565,0.011740207,0.0014097246,0.000021773096,0.00006632056,0.000093764174,0.95602226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983835,0.00043650568,0.000037278332,0.00014452382,0.0006324961,0.00036579365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809664,0.00061106257,0.00009502292,0.00020163757,0.0004633864,0.00053220993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013539282,0.00072652387,0.00035362126,0.0011301694,0.011489293,0.00817646,0.00079176726,0.002689658,0.062123347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056766625,0.0003681705,0.00027379213,0.0016587757,0.006005508,0.0060141506,0.004091086,0.0040079514,0.012895884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000134098145,0.00000790247,0.0000703834,0.000036671885,0.0000014007064,0.00013089331,0.005411874,0.000040782787,0.000046870875,0.14082688,0.8355065,0.017906414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.7433473e-7,9.4738346e-7,0.000045618064,0.000032246076,2.3833472e-7,0.000026001391,0.00066619925,0.00000521045,0.000010862079,0.0014639599,0.9977464,0.0000015131521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06616404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12634613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06616404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012049533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01050213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20782328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830377","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0004","title":"Contractual Howlers: A Russian Bond Case Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bond; Order (exchange); Meaning (existential); Literal and figurative language; Law; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Sociology; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Finance","score_opus":0.029088612063656025,"score_gpt":0.2105053900414622,"score_spread":0.1814167779778062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789488,0.0003905387,0.0022898673,0.0012569631,0.000012894417,0.000036425026,0.00003344149,0.00000822415,0.01702301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963934,0.0003069795,0.00077763456,0.00011520814,0.000006492827,0.000023358769,0.00001855891,0.0000070891183,0.002351239],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949673,0.0035732992,0.00020058674,0.0003145028,0.00045478946,0.00048960594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960091,0.0025408522,0.0006627195,0.0002908876,0.00027402616,0.00022227195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045856135,0.00035284305,0.0005284086,0.0006503161,0.010899618,0.003061418,0.0010180556,0.003253413,0.0019069086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008143078,0.0004148291,0.0003357063,0.0013178054,0.005331899,0.0030763026,0.0028361038,0.0030719829,0.000357391],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021719994,0.00022935745,0.026803456,0.00013606186,0.000029972289,0.018256105,0.6599457,0.0013917298,0.0026891122,0.27305457,0.0024474969,0.014799219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057277146,0.00032542917,0.034737527,0.0004553104,0.000060541628,0.011800464,0.8118552,0.007525217,0.003508465,0.029740425,0.09981435,0.00011982064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016088082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014602127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016088082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036917268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013327472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03198886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830382","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0007","title":"Access to Justice and Civil-Procedural Bargaining","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Procedural justice; Political science; Psychological intervention; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Civil procedure; Context (archaeology); Public administration; Law and economics; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.03697158666923104,"score_gpt":0.2247608322656042,"score_spread":0.18778924559637317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037329353,0.00386578,0.085274674,0.023820765,0.00031444727,0.00012857803,0.00007980387,0.000109438326,0.84907705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96280247,0.0014518505,0.0058276323,0.0021477933,0.00021951502,0.00010628566,0.00003483562,0.00004968016,0.027359998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9817555,0.0068294103,0.0006131435,0.0022154348,0.0042330404,0.0043535433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99117416,0.0050745686,0.0008856195,0.0012434318,0.0008305617,0.0007917717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013971999,0.00048447074,0.000675819,0.0014914903,0.009262051,0.015170251,0.0029989292,0.0065400708,0.01339125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019490073,0.0004000766,0.00086712296,0.0021735406,0.05578254,0.010349039,0.009103618,0.007125375,0.0012179607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017092126,0.000002932458,0.000044136617,0.0000056183558,0.0000012105716,0.000017157987,0.00061504205,0.00016782168,0.000013003481,0.9978417,0.0002137963,0.0010757805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008214888,0.00000845208,0.0002765402,0.00009325744,0.0000049385008,0.00004134507,0.0010115361,0.00089132116,0.000096084885,0.971117,0.026435394,0.000015841591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05913518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04297801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05913518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01576341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01576776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117581904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385830403","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0002","title":"An Evidence-Based Approach to Private Ordering","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Incentive; Bargaining power; Law and economics; Arbitration; Private information retrieval; Ex-ante; Business; Imperfect; Economics; Political science; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04934786125561251,"score_gpt":0.21232620027880708,"score_spread":0.16297833902319458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385830403","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058165984,0.085016616,0.47225273,0.25119805,0.0040719924,0.0016249375,0.002343358,0.00028514763,0.17739064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48524955,0.06178969,0.37992784,0.047197904,0.0066295387,0.0025347648,0.0016197357,0.00014316237,0.01490778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90908736,0.056182254,0.006922454,0.009856639,0.01649888,0.0014524146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6946664,0.24779278,0.011828347,0.021869758,0.02149534,0.0023474207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11397442,0.0020926143,0.0036686587,0.016110264,0.003470778,0.013479158,0.008276673,0.014463668,0.010042707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18791226,0.0013368375,0.0033843978,0.007448207,0.029932683,0.02085501,0.007815796,0.016620371,0.0021380964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006751849,0.000088558016,0.0012703456,0.0018416636,0.00036690445,0.000672586,0.00052987254,0.0023395757,0.00018097684,0.9458301,0.0072447206,0.039567176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054426644,0.00005614882,0.00033850255,0.0024622004,0.00012817707,0.00029677156,0.0002161119,0.0020041743,0.00027600725,0.95214623,0.04197363,0.000047645703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006105717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005862667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11397442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012470676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020627197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60276157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385835846","doi":"10.25167/osap.5062","title":"An Economic Analysis of Iran’s 2017 Judicial System Reforms: Ways with Long-term Effects to Improve Judicial System’s Litigation Delay","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Opole Studies in Administration and Law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Order (exchange); Term (time); Judicial reform; Dispute resolution; Economics; Political science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.043267639556314505,"score_gpt":0.2901491621371115,"score_spread":0.24688152258079699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385835846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92238986,0.0030508246,0.0040900656,0.010956329,0.00021836783,0.00017582881,0.00073455274,0.000036810477,0.05834733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99572635,0.0008734515,0.00054338237,0.00023099831,0.00010767845,0.000020708952,0.00019175083,0.000004908428,0.0023008357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978393,0.00047606145,0.000107403976,0.000148425,0.00092447066,0.0005043834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945123,0.0018077831,0.0016864458,0.00015034496,0.0015456242,0.00029747502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003120922,0.00019297199,0.0002819491,0.0012665264,0.0006985305,0.003212147,0.00054485607,0.0007987246,0.0033917557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009744916,0.000120729506,0.00058490655,0.0018218203,0.0009447924,0.0016388912,0.00069568807,0.0016293569,0.00025585026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055682,0.0009376712,0.2585192,0.00090754504,0.00044285355,0.0014399078,0.0027361887,0.06145164,0.001883803,0.48032174,0.0420378,0.14876474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023853172,0.0010799828,0.70837826,0.0005192665,0.00079763634,0.00036791322,0.015337686,0.07403012,0.00459634,0.07095702,0.123543784,0.00015348231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020761171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016722344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020761171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008020647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077714673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05819422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386349504","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v25i4.6337","title":"Do Work Barriers for Justice-Impacted Individuals Incentivize Criminal Behavior?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Imprisonment; Collateral; Conviction; Work (physics); Unemployment; Prison; State (computer science); Per capita; Demographic economics; Affect (linguistics); Unemployment rate; Criminology; Political science; Business; Labour economics; Economics; Psychology; Law; Economic growth; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.044653782709568574,"score_gpt":0.2408924200364604,"score_spread":0.1962386373268918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386349504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9733608,0.00032262813,0.0007372316,0.006356531,0.000036256366,0.000039515748,0.0002660024,0.000018499739,0.018862674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853206,0.00009088919,0.00013066092,0.0003068637,0.000017236318,0.000015191961,0.00004855515,0.000004694219,0.00085370074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978264,0.00080302206,0.00008008291,0.0002226794,0.00028287453,0.00078496337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788213,0.0059588132,0.009812157,0.0008398855,0.0007504431,0.003817512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015751559,0.00015787416,0.00032704664,0.00074473623,0.0011401539,0.0020238284,0.0005287837,0.0015042423,0.0099576255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018755335,0.00026928756,0.00031674508,0.0007296754,0.0012187412,0.0012725894,0.0013194953,0.0013658174,0.00062657386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003216364,0.0015310337,0.9246022,0.00009062085,0.000117035364,0.00027416667,0.002200735,0.0015677423,0.00085711456,0.025915347,0.004391527,0.038130764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035597204,0.00018553194,0.97388625,0.0001425353,0.00005008572,0.00016005785,0.004217655,0.0019785205,0.00028318155,0.01146255,0.0075712376,0.000026902411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010220731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030472301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010220731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014052839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021645587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033311546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386833736","doi":"10.1017/xps.2023.26","title":"Recognition probability in legislative bargaining","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Legislature; Preference; Economics; Probability model; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Statistics; Political science; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.09532059939449421,"score_gpt":0.3013719644194658,"score_spread":0.20605136502497157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386833736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8412459,0.00046131268,0.030229408,0.0025699302,0.00014443861,0.00015082309,0.00008459425,0.00008088168,0.12503271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967506,0.00005157883,0.0010941316,0.0001742759,0.000051389212,0.000040847062,0.000016497599,0.000008069971,0.0018127133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98787385,0.007370303,0.0004718638,0.0011425869,0.0022413104,0.0009001407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9231044,0.053524356,0.0136458045,0.00555061,0.0020380663,0.0021367308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014684841,0.00040343654,0.00090234604,0.00068759295,0.0010835553,0.0028906956,0.00082175847,0.0023042448,0.019183753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061827414,0.0003144026,0.0004959487,0.00065801165,0.0036915042,0.002853823,0.0017542829,0.0028972519,0.0013241487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004481442,0.0019683633,0.06850427,0.0004485123,0.00019581639,0.0005117774,0.0031392279,0.027233358,0.020585945,0.76582474,0.004493461,0.10261308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076722447,0.0037292305,0.11233397,0.00014676386,0.00018109666,0.00064640585,0.0019135074,0.05877298,0.009227223,0.7987348,0.0133892605,0.00015761841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004084734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002832302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019183753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015418511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092437805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07766181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386897495","doi":"10.1111/1911-3846.12907","title":"The merits of securities litigation and corporate reputation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Accounting Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"College of Engineering, Michigan State University; Pennsylvania State University; Michigan State University; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Reputation; Class action; Securities fraud; Business; Litigation risk analysis; Accounting; Security market; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Economics; Law; Finance; Political science; Audit","score_opus":0.14522233953463956,"score_gpt":0.3011312888550507,"score_spread":0.15590894932041113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386897495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97440106,0.00091438164,0.0010374007,0.0015487577,0.000024887642,0.00001717733,0.00009864793,0.000016915375,0.021940732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950755,0.000045737394,0.00004154881,0.000013125695,0.00001748302,0.0000011887228,0.000014313452,8.037695e-7,0.00035810756],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657404,0.0009925598,0.00034844404,0.000315449,0.001168757,0.0006008035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83934385,0.05873217,0.082965806,0.0036264176,0.008509547,0.006822271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043189037,0.00013966604,0.00049565616,0.0021134366,0.0010118117,0.0045725596,0.00054980686,0.0011546122,0.0052173184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05822917,0.00014671571,0.00038422926,0.0014908393,0.0020875232,0.002940505,0.0016480208,0.001502704,0.00053548417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004723877,0.0005632929,0.91241455,0.00009183777,0.00021853019,0.00066079386,0.00095224025,0.010596726,0.0015806002,0.038119692,0.0018124668,0.032516807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040239673,0.00043368302,0.95000255,0.000063969834,0.00011053017,0.00050482765,0.0011538875,0.015404113,0.0011724756,0.029094813,0.0019453561,0.00007352974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002472436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002772119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052173184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028652002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000735111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022840858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386927534","doi":"10.7202/1091859ar","title":"Punitive Damages and the Demand for Insurance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Actuarial science; On demand; Business; Economics; Law; Political science; Commerce","score_opus":0.06488514898419871,"score_gpt":0.24345980073019127,"score_spread":0.17857465174599257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386927534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7846227,0.026482958,0.008017948,0.0666983,0.00041283955,0.000060286144,0.002234079,0.000045363202,0.11142546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900922,0.0024694335,0.00023013107,0.00058899255,0.00019512222,0.0000135367145,0.00021241933,0.0000059048716,0.0061921873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989949,0.00035210286,0.000081826125,0.0001173586,0.0002459359,0.00020795556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776905,0.014156109,0.0055965055,0.00041709119,0.0011558575,0.0009839856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014618502,0.0001820393,0.0003485024,0.0006419567,0.0004182848,0.0018305175,0.00054380106,0.0022084455,0.013555517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017264348,0.00021629808,0.00029965548,0.00064991065,0.0014095281,0.0019425785,0.00087212323,0.0024162612,0.0006611604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070091174,0.0008811973,0.14518449,0.0003376494,0.0002053522,0.001254841,0.0016940573,0.017551666,0.001018355,0.72903985,0.035108373,0.0670232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012156619,0.00033154336,0.22075243,0.0003919571,0.0000920883,0.0013555941,0.0023349358,0.024291482,0.0003732046,0.7019407,0.04790112,0.000113286434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026324964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032381725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013555517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017774489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007962866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04534775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387497916","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2023.102909","title":"A dual approach to agency problems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Mathematical optimization; Constraint (computer-aided design); Uniqueness; Principal–agent problem; Convex optimization; Regular polygon; Simple (philosophy); Agency (philosophy); Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.06479482765627677,"score_gpt":0.2323121892705191,"score_spread":0.16751736161424235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387497916","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010394542,0.0012390977,0.91673404,0.006365877,0.00031279426,0.000065292654,0.00011153347,0.0000373539,0.06473942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71503794,0.0025448694,0.23817122,0.001976915,0.00157673,0.00049681053,0.00015794652,0.00012884816,0.03990866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599224,0.002497836,0.00011512442,0.0005137539,0.00060635916,0.00027470812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99637955,0.00213042,0.00032601642,0.00046528675,0.0004594294,0.00023923037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034681584,0.0009789845,0.0009974897,0.001040891,0.0012390693,0.0040911925,0.0016493229,0.0028263396,0.00717991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075472593,0.0005591356,0.0015407804,0.0008274801,0.004525892,0.0045636916,0.0029169216,0.0063810092,0.00074189855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044393773,0.000010697271,0.000039248775,0.0000147929995,0.0000055236246,0.00001746429,0.000035746336,0.003985815,0.00006825903,0.9939668,0.0005463025,0.0013048566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015843545,0.000016429603,0.00004440039,0.000025898074,0.000006392263,0.00006218114,0.000033953733,0.04587094,0.00011452131,0.94655925,0.0072408733,0.000009228767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010664206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096688134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00717991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029458322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024700523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024019241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387498866","doi":"10.1111/jpet.12669","title":"Optimal law enforcement when individuals are either moral or norm followers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economic Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"George Mason University","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Legal norm; Social planner; Enforcement; Law enforcement; Economics; Law and economics; Social psychology; Law; Microeconomics; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.05970765005296529,"score_gpt":0.24245155035689733,"score_spread":0.18274390030393203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387498866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.945929,0.00018815557,0.028935803,0.0024732936,0.000051574643,0.00006481877,0.00015559954,0.000036334313,0.022165515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99651295,0.00004927378,0.0017832794,0.000084399704,0.000017974928,0.000018492547,0.000031638665,0.0000046163564,0.0014973452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760556,0.0010320154,0.00012406381,0.00033783785,0.00018516257,0.0007153978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99343336,0.0028953266,0.0018442055,0.000418095,0.0005453731,0.0008636091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026877453,0.0003190098,0.0007278687,0.00051185035,0.00048338875,0.0018716067,0.00054408726,0.0013875498,0.0034116164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011690976,0.00036720445,0.00027173694,0.0003023037,0.0015812899,0.0012390799,0.0007463323,0.0009754183,0.0003272659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018020069,0.0020976637,0.06827841,0.00032119468,0.00052289123,0.00084969436,0.0009234501,0.29126176,0.00895688,0.5467944,0.010692379,0.06749925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005008403,0.0005356535,0.03463786,0.00012637464,0.00010545289,0.00018316273,0.0015297268,0.47390664,0.0023491865,0.48317817,0.0028736712,0.00007324082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037824379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003008721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037824379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015879114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012829658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014214337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387587735","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4574439","title":"Prosecutorial Discretion: A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Psychology; Political science; Econometrics; Law and economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.012784137435909,"score_gpt":0.21771035773365902,"score_spread":0.20492622029775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387587735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.931321,0.0008613831,0.009779689,0.0028591002,0.00014330518,0.0009854035,0.0005924345,0.000070124355,0.05338747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99531317,0.00021620501,0.0017886842,0.00028668443,0.000098342454,0.00022382734,0.00011131678,0.000029789959,0.0019320424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.98582387,0.0074932636,0.0009239938,0.0019912978,0.002641596,0.0011260484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48264956,0.45995116,0.026879841,0.023237351,0.0048615877,0.002420457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023931596,0.00079093775,0.0020205604,0.0017388809,0.0024295072,0.0061711585,0.0045503885,0.003253473,0.053556994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17476447,0.001111566,0.0009768072,0.0018345473,0.006212475,0.008343666,0.0034307549,0.004737675,0.0024746505],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0364112,0.051177125,0.0661302,0.0030491848,0.0011237635,0.0012818138,0.01352654,0.011834836,0.024654796,0.70579493,0.009059219,0.075956315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018270679,0.014009349,0.122150235,0.0006081459,0.0026613178,0.0015153021,0.009348463,0.0815573,0.011184869,0.727633,0.010598462,0.00046284034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019397349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001823769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053556994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028606306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002709768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17916602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387868103","doi":"10.3386/w31806","title":"Laffer's Day in Court: The Revenue Effects of Criminal Justice Fees and Fines","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Laffer curve; Criminal justice; Revenue; Criminal court; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Business; Economics; Psychology; Tax reform; Finance; Gross income; State income tax","score_opus":0.3513804319177095,"score_gpt":0.4567671823898897,"score_spread":0.10538675047218021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387868103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6005245,0.004317296,0.0020236594,0.029482095,0.00020966836,0.00007673524,0.0011994229,0.000108575834,0.36205795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98829657,0.0009849604,0.00017276268,0.00079955376,0.00015765514,0.000010037138,0.00016710768,0.000025515006,0.00938575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974498,0.0009301212,0.00006003685,0.00017558083,0.0006434036,0.0007410723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797656,0.013064243,0.0027516866,0.00065226626,0.0019289689,0.0018371557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002936589,0.00028013112,0.0007739802,0.0017502283,0.001538339,0.0057475753,0.000963956,0.0021295962,0.020693522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037903313,0.00023305962,0.00082188693,0.0015742307,0.0025824786,0.003515594,0.0016824347,0.003635213,0.00199051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000834952,0.0010329228,0.08876983,0.0001538505,0.000126361,0.0024003452,0.001304561,0.030273471,0.0006254945,0.66001135,0.10828071,0.10618623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047453234,0.0008144079,0.2975093,0.0004260184,0.00031290908,0.0017900125,0.0067086914,0.07807383,0.0013942707,0.53586483,0.076354146,0.00027708302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032437976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03660747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032437976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060461545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002561089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06922668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387884589","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4609875","title":"Laffer's Day in Court: The Revenue Effects of Criminal Justice Fees and Fines","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Laffer curve; Economics; Criminal justice; Revenue; Economic Justice; Law; Tax revenue; Political science; Tax reform; Accounting; Gross income; State income tax","score_opus":0.014462284727365831,"score_gpt":0.2193957866214648,"score_spread":0.20493350189409898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387884589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6870384,0.003790985,0.0016287247,0.051709045,0.0006858779,0.00007860199,0.0016617577,0.00013764104,0.25326902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834095,0.00063934753,0.00010682415,0.0011362834,0.00038841585,0.0000105670115,0.00012370551,0.00003476387,0.014150652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967434,0.0012374015,0.00009778345,0.00030769268,0.0005986328,0.0010151046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9674489,0.023790194,0.0025915504,0.00081932,0.0020493334,0.003300767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004288845,0.000349189,0.0013718401,0.0014443569,0.002888816,0.009735028,0.001632384,0.005049193,0.03407493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046089444,0.00042575103,0.0010822554,0.0014668083,0.0028944693,0.0055201845,0.0022532553,0.0076579927,0.002505294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003189403,0.002501661,0.082010515,0.00018805094,0.00037988814,0.002744752,0.002422942,0.02839707,0.00091576367,0.6448471,0.16181426,0.070588596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088894257,0.0009681518,0.26764238,0.00023548624,0.00087845663,0.00092493783,0.010075792,0.061092343,0.0012367684,0.60501075,0.050615408,0.00043070494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05616109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.100726806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05616109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058418773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039313757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113991976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387999137","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4587945","title":"Hunting for Employees, Employers, Independent Contractors, Dependent Contractors, Independent Employees, Workers, and Other Figments of the Legal Imagination","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Independent contractor; Business; Management; Public relations; Labour economics; Engineering; Work (physics); Political science; Economics; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.017950437477933782,"score_gpt":0.23442726916503903,"score_spread":0.21647683168710524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387999137","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24157579,0.0101161245,0.01610557,0.118231006,0.0014450887,0.000033178745,0.0001691341,0.000058845155,0.61226535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90944016,0.0017482243,0.0024087653,0.00653254,0.00062377995,0.0000240285,0.000058919904,0.0000700765,0.079093456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733585,0.0013511432,0.0000636294,0.0003380291,0.00046220727,0.00044910805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99354506,0.0037247278,0.00042471953,0.0009117689,0.000410144,0.0009836071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004764934,0.00027047168,0.00050944096,0.0019093362,0.015129776,0.011978005,0.0010802735,0.0047306158,0.01033332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008115553,0.00034508045,0.0003689748,0.0018053418,0.031984773,0.011783105,0.0040159384,0.0047776205,0.0008000942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003688906,0.000027878801,0.0030061784,0.000021815542,0.0000065891713,0.00015447327,0.038761094,0.00006558974,0.00012322697,0.90203387,0.03227521,0.023487272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011842298,0.000026527727,0.006136703,0.00032682883,0.000013000676,0.0003996543,0.118616715,0.00052936986,0.00026574533,0.64102685,0.23261137,0.000035484718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007375137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02627726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015129776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002462098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025878057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03456843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388439232","doi":"10.7202/1106239ar","title":"Punitive Damage Effects on Post-Loss Bargaining and Settlement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Bargaining power; Settlement (finance); Payment; Damages; Human settlement; Affect (linguistics); Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Law; Finance; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.036353180230036274,"score_gpt":0.2541861766048172,"score_spread":0.2178329963747809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388439232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80423254,0.0008694108,0.060158864,0.0033586037,0.00021469688,0.00015709987,0.00016866527,0.000099878554,0.1307402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961934,0.00011818765,0.00079988263,0.000077150355,0.000032023818,0.000014007872,0.000009394329,0.000006569203,0.0027492677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947568,0.0021418177,0.00025598297,0.00043188996,0.0009222154,0.0014912153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92682606,0.05623312,0.010336547,0.0027035705,0.0021373453,0.0017633622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011526352,0.0005247066,0.0010019209,0.0012464462,0.0014601739,0.0037386958,0.0014319747,0.002110474,0.030816296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05238699,0.00047398102,0.00087886106,0.00068593083,0.0042270552,0.0033903085,0.0028865286,0.0033473421,0.0012310188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083184993,0.0010455748,0.021638926,0.00017492799,0.00013203578,0.0011816793,0.0012681074,0.17452088,0.0058913818,0.7621755,0.002167798,0.028971316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000357181,0.001061782,0.043038547,0.00012190534,0.00019870924,0.00054956233,0.0018693452,0.22411962,0.0048284717,0.71999997,0.0037028869,0.00015195226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012961987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014762445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030816296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003127058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014172379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10309076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388439339","doi":"10.7202/1091739ar","title":"Prévention des risques en présence d’asymétries d’information : quelques résultats théoriques","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024540175000667006,"score_gpt":0.2585333365293208,"score_spread":0.2339931615286538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388439339","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18104467,0.060011137,0.45662844,0.14523421,0.0022338172,0.00067357055,0.0014097522,0.0006251288,0.15213925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9394633,0.018078133,0.025426097,0.00515564,0.0013952878,0.00036719593,0.0002267037,0.000089903704,0.009797711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98787016,0.0050236955,0.000660568,0.0016280676,0.0037546952,0.0010629327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79571426,0.16906902,0.016079618,0.009943914,0.0077507263,0.0014425397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016705394,0.0014004828,0.0022006198,0.0031811756,0.0014146173,0.004786841,0.002323,0.0054614856,0.013842712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12588564,0.0009417874,0.0026855194,0.0021007883,0.008375308,0.009506883,0.0035292192,0.0072501847,0.0012711649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005511064,0.0009013026,0.027610324,0.0017608188,0.0008348926,0.0009324197,0.0014276172,0.0167632,0.0011320275,0.7968696,0.014719627,0.13649699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002496976,0.00039158107,0.007620235,0.00057511695,0.00054480013,0.00088412163,0.0006531432,0.02512458,0.001689254,0.95330477,0.0088606225,0.000102089696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030592037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014101148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016705394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003239829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026178553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088347614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388439432","doi":"10.7202/1092515ar","title":"Les derniers développements concernantl’obligation de défendre de l’assureur","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Obligation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.051967523290574594,"score_gpt":0.2691940398880537,"score_spread":0.2172265165974791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388439432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07373114,0.11423161,0.052752372,0.04908522,0.0035249344,0.00024622775,0.0009772538,0.00033169892,0.7051195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36543337,0.07976858,0.034917913,0.0046300804,0.002104898,0.00026933558,0.0012121632,0.0003157877,0.5113479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962167,0.0009151152,0.00022073592,0.00046398697,0.0016733626,0.00051011465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944391,0.002033337,0.00075729185,0.000580566,0.0016024791,0.0005872292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003686066,0.0006156922,0.0003377834,0.0020667885,0.0017570993,0.00534413,0.0010716399,0.0030470325,0.023422714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006897427,0.00037207417,0.0008170451,0.0013702791,0.0023250133,0.0032700545,0.0027105438,0.003899945,0.0047210637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009957259,0.00015838622,0.002855658,0.0004750764,0.000026692876,0.00068000593,0.0031826391,0.0011890288,0.0047043804,0.682915,0.04643221,0.25728127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007866909,0.00008800691,0.006147879,0.00039205773,0.00001183205,0.0011691751,0.0007817105,0.00047473065,0.0033908305,0.040397722,0.94710475,0.00003352221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061031883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00636181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023422714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052372566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003951395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0783568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388439646","doi":"10.7202/1091737ar","title":"Choix de contrat et sinistralité chez les jeunes conducteurs","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06040596405080981,"score_gpt":0.2813655386317394,"score_spread":0.2209595745809296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388439646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99135536,0.0033109034,0.00027919514,0.00084335974,0.00003863867,0.000007956139,0.00013102646,0.000005566641,0.00402804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937581,0.0014397929,0.00023342413,0.000085856875,0.000034618126,0.000006455276,0.00008446421,0.0000034381806,0.0043539368],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902105,0.0003683345,0.000066218665,0.00011331839,0.00022995267,0.0002011345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499315,0.002123825,0.0016036365,0.00018445837,0.0007304103,0.00036448194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001294979,0.00029130507,0.00034265863,0.0011656276,0.0011577703,0.0012408184,0.00024895513,0.0008413694,0.003412239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009872982,0.000205794,0.00023896943,0.00074532937,0.0015115538,0.00062972674,0.0005278929,0.0014994314,0.00028043948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001143256,0.00024925335,0.8479571,0.00016254422,0.00016736839,0.0054210275,0.027837675,0.00079066283,0.0034968634,0.01757704,0.0043444135,0.09085279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054207772,0.0003493253,0.95033705,0.00022741068,0.000079324745,0.009419769,0.013258039,0.00077217096,0.0018432506,0.0045769755,0.019012775,0.00006977909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04099314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0383614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04099314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010874869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010645366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08150911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388626897","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4603848","title":"The Limits of Enforcing Contract Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Severability; Business; Exclusion clause; Privity of contract; Law and economics; Economics; Contract management; Political science","score_opus":0.023893410513063963,"score_gpt":0.2274021508903103,"score_spread":0.20350874037724634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388626897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11021097,0.0044617364,0.07010859,0.0504983,0.00038903544,0.00009481669,0.00025723092,0.00022506047,0.7637542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836774,0.0008029806,0.004962735,0.0018366288,0.0005149501,0.0001413974,0.00004967076,0.00007014815,0.007944099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9729177,0.012428565,0.001680658,0.0031874203,0.0075763306,0.0022093812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79436177,0.16214554,0.008253385,0.022530768,0.008451211,0.004257442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030277567,0.000465065,0.0016623006,0.002092681,0.005403514,0.020439139,0.00362883,0.009741199,0.011922293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16015576,0.0012043271,0.0009997397,0.0019442359,0.026824845,0.018024275,0.0069857184,0.01389231,0.0012880506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012015521,0.000011939138,0.0001534933,0.000008864481,0.0000031679467,0.00001520555,0.00021530915,0.00036928547,0.000033791333,0.996741,0.0005455588,0.0018905124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000084830635,0.0000044354338,0.00009587197,0.000020281224,0.0000035365229,0.00001517906,0.000110430694,0.0011280905,0.000046405195,0.99654585,0.0020169276,0.0000045643656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050863456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025191945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030277567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005321394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074523115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16012496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388651793","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-3591862/v1","title":"Efficiency and Equilibrium Selection in Arbitrated Bargaining","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Government of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Mathematical economics; Economics; Microeconomics; Equilibrium selection; Computer science; Game theory; Repeated game; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1254703624138308,"score_gpt":0.33653481910311883,"score_spread":0.21106445668928803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388651793","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33613026,0.0005384745,0.5357258,0.0033980568,0.00008320271,0.00029610138,0.00018686416,0.00013004664,0.12351124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778855,0.0001527031,0.014477694,0.00015423298,0.00004728365,0.00015939996,0.000058296493,0.000033530956,0.007031303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857098,0.009502966,0.00047218273,0.0011829518,0.0014876882,0.001644442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97142935,0.02182772,0.002450463,0.0019682813,0.0013833278,0.0009408983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0139748715,0.00067809224,0.001774567,0.001225756,0.0015388743,0.0052316994,0.0022356766,0.0029858397,0.011866851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039765462,0.00071886205,0.0011730833,0.0012008614,0.0063567115,0.0053560487,0.0030190714,0.0023015398,0.001123014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010074615,0.000063738014,0.00082617666,0.000051269813,0.00003916269,0.00011711493,0.0002052442,0.05296124,0.0005060615,0.939303,0.0007742105,0.00505214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008912501,0.00003648099,0.0003026318,0.000023426319,0.000010513501,0.000042677857,0.000103144055,0.13075896,0.0002608899,0.8673385,0.001019263,0.000014453363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011343802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006909328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0139748715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033283783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017400963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07390708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388745081","doi":"10.1061/jladah.ladr-1059","title":"Evolvement of Excusable Delay Clauses in Government Contracts since the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Government (linguistics); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Business; Virology; Medicine; Disease; Outbreak","score_opus":0.020247451264098326,"score_gpt":0.21156143576066824,"score_spread":0.19131398449656992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388745081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771757,0.00034966078,0.0022599774,0.002824087,0.000043801883,0.00008100776,0.00022321101,0.000028812015,0.01701377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99559855,0.00019275787,0.0012321969,0.00026089392,0.00001690221,0.000039654697,0.00016485457,0.00002270046,0.0024715373],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99170274,0.0033096387,0.0006831011,0.0006303921,0.0026129289,0.0010612253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95404047,0.020022953,0.012399806,0.0029531955,0.008592609,0.0019909914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01017945,0.00013395798,0.00017452188,0.0015598476,0.0025036929,0.0038071263,0.00087548734,0.0012068104,0.0027856284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049517512,0.0003230288,0.00018076679,0.0026197957,0.003776181,0.003943436,0.0026115668,0.0018108125,0.00030516385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003715842,0.00031537504,0.33047977,0.0004315079,0.000035736404,0.0027579474,0.36358836,0.00322621,0.008877739,0.12453139,0.007990126,0.15739433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025334752,0.00022279908,0.5054637,0.0006505715,0.000024956726,0.0011511997,0.28896305,0.0045553898,0.003236797,0.009924338,0.18561187,0.0001699024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032926846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035317417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032926846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010904493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008808756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07911801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389494360","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4649617","title":"Adverse Selection in Insurance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse selection; Business; Actuarial science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01579736135908288,"score_gpt":0.21048759011261972,"score_spread":0.19469022875353684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389494360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4238043,0.01967908,0.11791259,0.14297032,0.0024156934,0.00018258944,0.00048763404,0.00024101991,0.29230678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774974,0.00189629,0.0010365825,0.0020345596,0.0016951433,0.00004021619,0.000039895807,0.000016964063,0.015743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965869,0.0019896864,0.000114516246,0.0003806613,0.000486446,0.0004416976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816731,0.013422346,0.0018416649,0.00093247317,0.0010640153,0.0010664708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007349008,0.0003553112,0.0010241015,0.0010932116,0.0013874077,0.0036630593,0.00062939886,0.0038733575,0.00918818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024236923,0.0003070825,0.0005854607,0.0007210297,0.003880834,0.0026939474,0.0014752805,0.00339679,0.0007115266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051628354,0.00005527642,0.0049409885,0.000042642594,0.000051561037,0.00019421185,0.0002187451,0.0032043569,0.00014465257,0.97346985,0.008445698,0.009180365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022660472,0.000019096486,0.0019369688,0.000017194747,0.000012691774,0.00006776738,0.000056555553,0.0063479366,0.000033347354,0.9894594,0.0020181655,0.000008173882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020554839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015719383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00918818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016203801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013427474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038865745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389988181","doi":"10.7202/1092628ar","title":"Auto Insurance Reform for Canada’s Tort Provinces","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Business; Payment; Liability; Tort; Work (physics); Limiting; Compensation (psychology); Public economics; Punitive damages; Damages; Transaction cost; Actuarial science; Finance; Economics; Microeconomics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.029917152655445475,"score_gpt":0.23610387806007013,"score_spread":0.20618672540462465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389988181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6012779,0.0040325057,0.002656599,0.056379743,0.00059637387,0.00057368283,0.0042449594,0.00040132328,0.32983696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9255585,0.0009881825,0.002162317,0.0053668297,0.00010410977,0.00008359466,0.0008398538,0.000038667513,0.064857885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548197,0.00023251616,0.00008054019,0.00026465493,0.001485566,0.0024547703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953904,0.00039180776,0.00017433161,0.00027070186,0.00231838,0.0014544041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018873789,0.00024557943,0.00048871,0.0019530868,0.008790569,0.0055136466,0.0020220494,0.0020149213,0.008761731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008018663,0.0004627778,0.00072925905,0.0019449596,0.0013164375,0.0007497665,0.001878918,0.0018909565,0.0003910838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004635295,0.00034478595,0.062690765,0.00021237433,0.00017318617,0.0014524049,0.0030690697,0.013174368,0.0025781998,0.66563874,0.16038905,0.08981354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048750592,0.0001940667,0.24036065,0.0002832793,0.00031822518,0.0003849798,0.004225896,0.023056632,0.002221716,0.020852633,0.70742387,0.00019059937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12659219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12659219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23148428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91849494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389988197","doi":"10.7202/1092626ar","title":"Evaluating Deterrence Incentives acrossLegal Systems: Effects of Changingthe Basis for Measuring Exposure","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Deterrence (psychology); Basis (linear algebra); Law and economics; Public economics; Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08198405658409347,"score_gpt":0.29065208661190634,"score_spread":0.20866803002781287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389988197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9591727,0.0009394139,0.034461275,0.0009144231,0.0001058248,0.000495869,0.00037510207,0.0000469271,0.0034884291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98474854,0.00018653019,0.013955931,0.00014375223,0.00004418741,0.00022588285,0.00020014572,0.000015447291,0.00047970837],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8646558,0.10872041,0.0050533134,0.0053157685,0.013860309,0.0023943463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44352984,0.47528952,0.04666509,0.018367983,0.013527472,0.002620141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08270147,0.0011072387,0.001657658,0.0015009121,0.00095183577,0.003922477,0.001947944,0.003811185,0.003149443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3437212,0.00084840006,0.0017436642,0.0022531,0.002391953,0.0058095343,0.0046972083,0.0033203,0.00025505066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017406063,0.0071021407,0.39781448,0.0008716542,0.0034910887,0.00035481743,0.0008455043,0.35034165,0.009495242,0.032596517,0.002052857,0.17762803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019515159,0.0143877035,0.36920097,0.00037674882,0.0016543247,0.00032050337,0.00073263864,0.5373622,0.025367033,0.045488402,0.002789878,0.0003680699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038726383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031506992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08270147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033152432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020758426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4373724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390021981","doi":"10.7202/1092920ar","title":"RETHINKING INSURANCE DISPUTES","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Alternative dispute resolution; Mediation; Negotiation; Dispute resolution; Confidentiality; Privilege (computing); Business; Online dispute resolution; Insurance policy; Law and economics; Actuarial science; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.048915284700123074,"score_gpt":0.24641823699714513,"score_spread":0.19750295229702206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390021981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1740645,0.014426249,0.19290033,0.16297153,0.0051665604,0.00036849428,0.00014542887,0.00039763332,0.44955933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9506801,0.002124664,0.023242213,0.005896385,0.0011381367,0.00014026066,0.000053367687,0.00014235971,0.016582556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9485288,0.03188002,0.0024530627,0.0033523026,0.010430652,0.0033550982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9205134,0.059375588,0.0042188847,0.009091055,0.005317771,0.0014831959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04739874,0.00048640912,0.0011186182,0.003264649,0.012855867,0.021968668,0.004323298,0.011914915,0.00779695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11550776,0.00065528555,0.001071521,0.0024352088,0.028747018,0.024434976,0.016968885,0.012950196,0.0010696677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018365663,0.000016982773,0.00032128717,0.000052359683,0.00000825749,0.000256869,0.018137716,0.00050116505,0.00029657476,0.9618719,0.0033303685,0.015188102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000243992,0.000023172894,0.00040285435,0.00021222535,0.000016884722,0.00025721156,0.009613907,0.0034194305,0.00049027393,0.8525,0.13300583,0.00003381909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036677872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00296126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04739874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0079089375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006098117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25067145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390021984","doi":"10.7202/1093052ar","title":"Risque individuel et choix de contrat : le cas de l’assurance automobile","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Assurances et gestion des risques","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03238490601885519,"score_gpt":0.25684076875524614,"score_spread":0.22445586273639095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390021984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63615876,0.03777827,0.017083881,0.13675024,0.0007528499,0.00006793569,0.00055935053,0.00005606921,0.17079262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923923,0.0024532164,0.00079813495,0.0007596184,0.00023013505,0.000008678839,0.00004068685,0.0000062319186,0.0033110431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754363,0.0007058113,0.00010724095,0.00029254577,0.00078592234,0.0005647718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99152255,0.004633913,0.0020176568,0.00029611666,0.0008880421,0.0006417431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022571664,0.0003966149,0.00046668318,0.0021757816,0.0021119928,0.0034176575,0.000645696,0.00540701,0.0066510416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013950948,0.00030626528,0.00047651882,0.0016111679,0.0050248727,0.0031677808,0.0022428413,0.0033155382,0.00032269236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042057928,0.00018405524,0.12751327,0.00020876213,0.00012240474,0.012293617,0.004860208,0.0031618136,0.001003484,0.76649743,0.01648979,0.06724455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012629198,0.00038087374,0.12602279,0.00061985437,0.00024486263,0.04945967,0.00784324,0.013943416,0.0016334763,0.73741245,0.062057268,0.00025571213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016282005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012389671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016282005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025608586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016345987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03237444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390237321","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v10i1.873","title":"Intersecções entre o Eficientismo Processual Penal e o Neoliberalismo","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Authoritarianism; Premise; Neoliberalism (international relations); Pace; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Process (computing); Democracy; Ambiguity; Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.0328664267125104,"score_gpt":0.25678000447730454,"score_spread":0.22391357776479415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390237321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10369727,0.020232033,0.11992154,0.034723952,0.00032492517,0.00015622079,0.00008933602,0.00014532523,0.7207094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97889334,0.0030524174,0.010652002,0.0010686265,0.00018414664,0.000091936316,0.000020416413,0.000037069793,0.00599996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883591,0.0050021266,0.0004898004,0.0013801347,0.0037601665,0.0010086895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770822,0.0125809675,0.0029033595,0.004436378,0.0021262527,0.00087091106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0138372,0.00038016096,0.00067091227,0.0033589911,0.0026850968,0.008874949,0.0012417247,0.001960452,0.004014278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02250471,0.00042352022,0.00047352086,0.0027670301,0.03371884,0.0069347857,0.005001603,0.0035941561,0.00035889156],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034055627,0.000008929014,0.0003865797,0.000034918285,0.000004813159,0.000012940866,0.00078832364,0.00016205598,0.000044246557,0.9923268,0.00011591542,0.0061112447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000138084415,0.000031055664,0.004000894,0.0002933593,0.000015529158,0.00008032482,0.0009272946,0.00075720873,0.000219341,0.95215595,0.04149032,0.000014932209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031879642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0138372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007439248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007965966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07317901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390768267","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4688523","title":"Laffer's Day in Court: The Revenue Effects of Criminal Justice Fees and Fines","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Laffer curve; Revenue; Criminal justice; Economics; Criminal court; Economic Justice; Tax revenue; Monetary economics; Law; Political science; Public economics; Tax reform; Microeconomics; Finance; International law","score_opus":0.014042062474760893,"score_gpt":0.22520373358289378,"score_spread":0.2111616711081329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390768267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6938864,0.0044332026,0.0030592892,0.051354006,0.0006818004,0.00007938044,0.0019288918,0.00017300327,0.24440402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824751,0.0007698619,0.00015140208,0.0008859384,0.00038771183,0.0000108562135,0.00013226017,0.00003809027,0.015148766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718577,0.0010687313,0.00008880171,0.00030453264,0.00048303703,0.0008691277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97012377,0.022530789,0.0023957624,0.0008151368,0.0015007103,0.0026337293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040778746,0.0003631718,0.0014718244,0.0013721198,0.0024919359,0.008410468,0.0015434485,0.004851638,0.0352633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04153058,0.00043573027,0.0010180838,0.0015318234,0.0028399671,0.005499911,0.0020853986,0.0072884597,0.0022926454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023101466,0.0015988464,0.054298457,0.00019687397,0.00028038706,0.0022501743,0.0019809431,0.030013036,0.0008339859,0.71130466,0.12855688,0.06637553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005743881,0.00058181863,0.15583771,0.00017191787,0.0005677455,0.00075451174,0.0058852597,0.062434472,0.0009152542,0.736723,0.03526698,0.00028688647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041324474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06518876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041324474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050082854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031224713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11796749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391035661","doi":"10.1111/irj.12422","title":"The effects of the socio‐demographic factors on judgement building in arbitration","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial Relations Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Judgement; Arbitration; Multinomial logistic regression; Affect (linguistics); Set (abstract data type); Business; Actuarial science; Logistic regression; Psychology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04294501072171414,"score_gpt":0.24032464338953546,"score_spread":0.19737963266782133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391035661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935601,0.00014940854,0.000331319,0.0009269359,0.000012899446,0.000025783433,0.00007021877,0.0000023855114,0.004920995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955744,0.000043125845,0.000074886084,0.000031470405,0.000007620597,0.000006242504,0.000023532759,0.0000014545593,0.00025419865],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862731,0.008453108,0.00069768087,0.0005168627,0.002807917,0.0012514037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.848484,0.09597938,0.032416265,0.0032772527,0.00897137,0.01087183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013034377,0.0001568012,0.00030975943,0.0014488747,0.002247796,0.0024028027,0.0006961776,0.00082092074,0.007833918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09539881,0.0001994992,0.0004715084,0.0010760311,0.002340059,0.00088255166,0.0014856226,0.0012763985,0.0006840876],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014245427,0.00021223174,0.98775476,0.00001594646,0.000059095026,0.0001963171,0.0031738558,0.00040128166,0.000117161355,0.00069093535,0.00034708713,0.0068888916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070321717,0.00005539345,0.99034154,0.000025270145,0.000017113969,0.000091027156,0.00693504,0.00094871013,0.00007947339,0.0007531153,0.0007317129,0.000014490679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03275291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059003845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03275291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025746613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002733694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06893319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391240359","doi":"10.7202/1108671ar","title":"L’entreprise à mission va-t-elle sauver l’entreprise ?","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry","score_opus":0.01834570060913572,"score_gpt":0.22530130141231827,"score_spread":0.20695560080318254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391240359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023484735,0.0052586584,0.004845295,0.08471768,0.0017158554,0.00002773451,0.000095410745,0.00006935767,0.87978536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.589543,0.004991107,0.0021164746,0.013454347,0.00093028176,0.00008227605,0.0001432594,0.00015134254,0.3885879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968811,0.0011993842,0.00008391617,0.00052661874,0.0006962438,0.00061270467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997727,0.00090148917,0.00028637974,0.00029224035,0.0004337078,0.00035921915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002610191,0.00038584598,0.00035342918,0.000812945,0.0071859523,0.01418953,0.0011858501,0.004158743,0.027185129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047547757,0.00029612222,0.0003958115,0.0011796133,0.013694102,0.009712942,0.0045285053,0.006177815,0.00629987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001463105,0.000009021231,0.00042391376,0.000040323335,0.0000034029258,0.00007693397,0.004737683,0.000047712972,0.00010105191,0.9663626,0.016950373,0.011232345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014741557,0.000050065515,0.0020907584,0.0004218531,0.0000101879305,0.00019954507,0.014460277,0.0002916587,0.00046140267,0.19964863,0.7823231,0.000027729846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009575078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013468314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027185129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008153842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073264674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09094334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391830736","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.105035","title":"Courts, Crime and Economic Performance: Evidence from a Judicial Reform in Kenya","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Center for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economics; Judicial reform; Economic reform; Public economics; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.051592226397818845,"score_gpt":0.24123297347746764,"score_spread":0.18964074707964879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391830736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962882,0.00037961037,0.000035574598,0.0006939945,0.0000056057047,0.000017813178,0.00021245165,8.448091e-7,0.0023659775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998492,0.00039591952,0.000042046955,0.00011270359,0.000010124429,0.000009928974,0.00016104078,8.112998e-7,0.00077547296],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841595,0.00052962615,0.00011432536,0.00014647978,0.00022732062,0.0005662139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98918426,0.0038292534,0.0051037017,0.00028675282,0.00084417855,0.0007517895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018210436,0.00024939323,0.0005331933,0.0011422166,0.0025762108,0.001453352,0.0008614685,0.0016124814,0.003498069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008114263,0.00025418814,0.00029004164,0.0033161715,0.0027068264,0.0011927673,0.0014653221,0.0017176691,0.00025720868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015892738,0.0021332423,0.94581175,0.0003503916,0.00039072798,0.0019995917,0.0074989838,0.001799574,0.0015334149,0.014100363,0.0037157089,0.019077085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103511986,0.00026376304,0.98965234,0.000082453866,0.00025498806,0.00011076298,0.0058591766,0.00044128674,0.0005025447,0.0005333539,0.0021732394,0.00002271544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16807301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39117563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16807301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035907044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003760825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33418941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392456114","doi":"10.29173/wclawr99","title":"How Joint Enterprise Liability Neutered the Criminal Cases Review Commission in England","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Criminal liability; Liability; Joint (building); Business; Law; Joint and several liability; Criminal law; Political science; Criminology; Strict liability; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.06919509133041643,"score_gpt":0.261230759978987,"score_spread":0.19203566864857055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392456114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62400013,0.02145356,0.0017987797,0.22320892,0.0027808321,0.0004092889,0.000532955,0.00014005444,0.12567542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9061386,0.0042951386,0.0007950331,0.02276351,0.00054437516,0.00015143721,0.00017588917,0.000085004816,0.06505102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94809747,0.01925443,0.0030308387,0.004545837,0.013922724,0.011148775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.884724,0.059810787,0.012647464,0.0047410764,0.020078886,0.017997816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044661354,0.0002530135,0.0010372581,0.0034309686,0.013685255,0.018549811,0.0028059592,0.007584362,0.007482305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14261492,0.0015372735,0.00052852096,0.003876739,0.0072282627,0.00761382,0.009204642,0.0072736815,0.0016887207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048345313,0.00052866584,0.08698139,0.0011308254,0.00012502796,0.013755806,0.16582067,0.0010878328,0.003255558,0.4093105,0.19945179,0.11806859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018517398,0.00049936195,0.20126674,0.0020253314,0.00015289732,0.002198575,0.08212287,0.0011340118,0.0014615586,0.016153932,0.69233686,0.00046271714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42623585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6222197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42623585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037251517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05270525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84750974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392708838","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4754759","title":"Product Liability Litigation and Innovation: Evidence from Medical Devices","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Product liability; Business; Liability; Product innovation; Product (mathematics); Medical device; Industrial organization; Engineering; Accounting; Mathematics; Biomedical engineering","score_opus":0.02877940771478063,"score_gpt":0.2500321972526904,"score_spread":0.22125278953790975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392708838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85251147,0.031963337,0.0025150103,0.017601289,0.00010413488,0.00011837878,0.0009355395,0.000024908208,0.09422591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98913425,0.0066122315,0.0003239703,0.0014807284,0.00022363769,0.000017130722,0.00020740763,0.000004903267,0.0019957928],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900553,0.003307448,0.00076286343,0.0008918267,0.0039198073,0.0010627551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6671778,0.27441004,0.04131513,0.0059211804,0.008014692,0.0031611593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0094215125,0.0003730409,0.00081153953,0.0047058836,0.0023170004,0.00465327,0.0015328235,0.0073195975,0.011970643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084555775,0.00030082106,0.0008942935,0.0039075655,0.005760681,0.0035735825,0.0023824174,0.003489143,0.0009797366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0055469954,0.0048997737,0.5946661,0.0020291961,0.001119908,0.0064950874,0.0076788133,0.0046069957,0.0018325277,0.15206371,0.020817094,0.1982437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002047835,0.0051292754,0.7368762,0.0028538685,0.0020461539,0.010199114,0.009428906,0.005078019,0.005290484,0.16028774,0.06047474,0.00028768647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058133253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006263405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011970643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018392308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026541462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049826324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392727019","doi":"10.3386/w32215","title":"Product Liability Litigation and Innovation: Evidence from Medical Devices","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Product liability; Business; Liability; Product (mathematics); Product innovation; Industrial organization; Accounting; Mathematics","score_opus":0.42131287177680493,"score_gpt":0.47477575284358403,"score_spread":0.0534628810667791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392727019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674722,0.008017765,0.0018203746,0.0016973914,0.000035484307,0.00006301383,0.013589121,0.000038755257,0.0072658593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98622835,0.0024192797,0.00060792273,0.00031034212,0.00012431154,0.00004342801,0.009041128,0.000011950393,0.0012132775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904164,0.002915225,0.0011954022,0.0018376636,0.002713104,0.0009222538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78122324,0.09546787,0.10897927,0.0075238617,0.0039392603,0.002866525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005429891,0.00036699063,0.0008306179,0.005365069,0.0008143154,0.0024086689,0.0013548086,0.0020219437,0.005192402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04226055,0.00040314437,0.0015599175,0.008005993,0.0012783477,0.0015173545,0.002386845,0.001874356,0.0011586298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019552004,0.00023953148,0.98382044,0.00017859846,0.0005723911,0.00025382047,0.00022642166,0.0016714364,0.00015587741,0.0009902224,0.0024607028,0.009234986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048665686,0.00018969823,0.99140733,0.000095363874,0.00028804428,0.0003509752,0.0003679971,0.0019437207,0.00035541868,0.0007877709,0.0041363547,0.000028608509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021374688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02403126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021374688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009276651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010907718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042500556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392785743","doi":"10.1002/mde.4120","title":"Regulating unproductive contract adaptation: A payment deduction mechanism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Managerial and Decision Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Mechanism (biology); Adaptation (eye); Economics; Microeconomics; Business; Tax deduction; Mathematical economics; Public economics; Finance; Philosophy; State income tax","score_opus":0.030152046143160256,"score_gpt":0.21922977961427959,"score_spread":0.18907773347111934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392785743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55984664,0.0023466772,0.26981607,0.006003451,0.0004319614,0.002576162,0.0011619726,0.00086954725,0.1569475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98493457,0.00018188161,0.0089867525,0.00037577035,0.000093941875,0.00015285923,0.00005880201,0.000016031208,0.005199467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837757,0.005914447,0.001326316,0.0026479864,0.0043321536,0.0020034895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9297229,0.03128495,0.02273165,0.00969523,0.0050924835,0.0014727974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01495302,0.0007147827,0.00089074054,0.0017390407,0.0017140108,0.0054677366,0.0030062373,0.0042027286,0.011225799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03577614,0.00096251187,0.0015568481,0.0011945656,0.0050459984,0.00415,0.0024779744,0.0052267336,0.0011637721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055351766,0.0016224353,0.07530233,0.0006743093,0.000544021,0.0009177571,0.00094035023,0.039105073,0.009648061,0.76862,0.0074959,0.094576225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054875074,0.0022761305,0.13660933,0.0009106424,0.0011345813,0.0018457355,0.0017160232,0.21033531,0.018699596,0.5655589,0.059748348,0.0006165418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022971008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022381586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01495302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035177425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053136037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079080045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392792154","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4758138","title":"Product Liability Litigation and Innovation: Evidence from Medical Devices","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Product liability; Business; Liability; Product innovation; Product (mathematics); Actuarial science; Industrial organization; Accounting","score_opus":0.02877940771478063,"score_gpt":0.2500321972526904,"score_spread":0.22125278953790975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392792154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85251147,0.031963337,0.0025150103,0.017601289,0.00010413488,0.00011837878,0.0009355395,0.000024908208,0.09422591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98913425,0.0066122315,0.0003239703,0.0014807284,0.00022363769,0.000017130722,0.00020740763,0.000004903267,0.0019957928],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900553,0.003307448,0.00076286343,0.0008918267,0.0039198073,0.0010627551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6671778,0.27441004,0.04131513,0.0059211804,0.008014692,0.0031611593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0094215125,0.0003730409,0.00081153953,0.0047058836,0.0023170004,0.00465327,0.0015328235,0.0073195975,0.011970643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.084555775,0.00030082106,0.0008942935,0.0039075655,0.005760681,0.0035735825,0.0023824174,0.003489143,0.0009797366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0055469954,0.0048997737,0.5946661,0.0020291961,0.001119908,0.0064950874,0.0076788133,0.0046069957,0.0018325277,0.15206371,0.020817094,0.1982437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002047835,0.0051292754,0.7368762,0.0028538685,0.0020461539,0.010199114,0.009428906,0.005078019,0.005290484,0.16028774,0.06047474,0.00028768647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058133253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006263405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011970643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018392308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026541462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049826324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019937","doi":"10.7202/1105758ar","title":"Callow in More Ways Than One: The Supreme Court Causes More Confusion in Contract","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.04844921608553188,"score_gpt":0.252253833694125,"score_spread":0.20380461760859314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019937","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066718645,0.035229616,0.007206815,0.5294399,0.0038109638,0.000060411705,0.00038342728,0.000081810955,0.3570683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89995325,0.0057817735,0.0010704114,0.07017112,0.001828044,0.000050349223,0.00009576625,0.00014249113,0.02090689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.968646,0.012688523,0.0012052986,0.0027588087,0.010748028,0.0039534564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9548929,0.030748088,0.0028069403,0.0035645308,0.006383028,0.0016045086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014925364,0.00023548401,0.0006890751,0.0016447909,0.009224702,0.011762179,0.0011274909,0.008534847,0.0064201043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05269291,0.00047619874,0.0006832174,0.002811344,0.028782004,0.010672888,0.004653398,0.01115952,0.0007901241],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047715086,0.000012228621,0.0011070938,0.00005213991,0.000015618927,0.00020308414,0.003334478,0.000118948665,0.00012965828,0.92581785,0.060199264,0.00896195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007718165,0.000034615874,0.00789732,0.0005302708,0.00008424337,0.00046642247,0.008833789,0.0005204788,0.0008899215,0.7368632,0.24367955,0.00012309973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09447319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13906606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09447319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02193447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017821783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1878466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393224106","doi":"10.1522/revueot.v33n1.1715","title":"criminalité économique : une analyse des dispositions normatives québécoises sous l’angle de la criminalité en col blanc","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Organisations & territoires","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0288513421205196,"score_gpt":0.24645500310277405,"score_spread":0.21760366098225445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393224106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6631437,0.0015319447,0.002356304,0.016456742,0.00006597901,0.000059631973,0.00029772968,0.00002381139,0.31606415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981912,0.00044249647,0.0002789348,0.00028267747,0.000008631249,0.000030932693,0.000062056104,0.000011908386,0.016970381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709845,0.0010529403,0.00005899099,0.00028144103,0.0008888608,0.0006194015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995621,0.0012528243,0.0006143171,0.00019429241,0.0018453976,0.00047214297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024365957,0.00028525727,0.00025679113,0.0020256718,0.011035583,0.0062732305,0.0007477126,0.0011403483,0.004799367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006733244,0.00017962317,0.00016762238,0.0031015554,0.015061603,0.0016120694,0.0017044662,0.0018591754,0.00021659092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006798464,0.00005997576,0.06217924,0.00007254009,0.00003313901,0.0003740766,0.2904666,0.0010542313,0.00061733625,0.5942465,0.0127607975,0.03806748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000145306885,0.000047688616,0.34058878,0.00033900718,0.000032408396,0.00019922589,0.32873273,0.0029447512,0.00044759575,0.049465165,0.27705836,0.00012983462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91896737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94998187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081032634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048937347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03558676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.355067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393301473","doi":"","title":"Timely Negotiations: Formative Interactions in Cyclic Duets","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Formative assessment; Communication; Computer science; Business; Psychology; Linguistics; Political science; Mathematics education; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.21674209536883737,"score_gpt":0.4702844850921738,"score_spread":0.2535423897233364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393301473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4287538,0.0024858357,0.08471337,0.0047130287,0.00078841444,0.00020461355,0.00016534624,0.00046538326,0.47771013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791586,0.00029818405,0.0056587555,0.00017122959,0.000096125135,0.000060228893,0.000053026954,0.00013733227,0.014366442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580574,0.0023104304,0.00013684742,0.0005040117,0.000631218,0.00061169657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99508274,0.002751986,0.0006653357,0.0006538042,0.0003281761,0.0005178601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029994978,0.0005075959,0.00031005338,0.001449515,0.006468339,0.008882876,0.0012882346,0.0016911791,0.0133881625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013902856,0.00047128036,0.00046626103,0.0012233148,0.007329936,0.009240387,0.006644568,0.002349452,0.0014590875],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031158378,0.000097333635,0.0060201935,0.00027051472,0.00003625539,0.0023272482,0.35949352,0.0012183151,0.0062830793,0.5405904,0.004588563,0.078763075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011000911,0.0002476341,0.012396323,0.00047853732,0.00004778184,0.0029217533,0.26447242,0.0042040297,0.0032104626,0.22410862,0.48764423,0.00015820884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017685858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022254612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0133881625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018578104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011899503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044787824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394911997","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2023.00383","title":"Strategy-Proof Multi-Issue Mediation: An Application to Online Dispute Resolution","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Alternative dispute resolution; Proof of concept; Dispute resolution; Computer science; Resolution (logic); Law and economics; Business; Process management; Political science; Economics; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.037081866637911326,"score_gpt":0.2701967981273111,"score_spread":0.2331149314893998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394911997","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075142407,0.00039203986,0.96686405,0.0019334308,0.00015745588,0.00024311684,0.000074620235,0.000369,0.022452116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3271171,0.00074263685,0.65301156,0.0006467083,0.00029783425,0.0007762009,0.00014642904,0.00023794359,0.017023604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955907,0.0023785066,0.0002554096,0.00053322676,0.0009622907,0.000279918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98861,0.0090177115,0.00046800074,0.0007983199,0.0006706608,0.00043525558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067694117,0.0007883846,0.001118597,0.0013283595,0.0025939064,0.0041637127,0.00294902,0.00420857,0.017338287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027057495,0.0005617587,0.0019262816,0.002454133,0.0031597086,0.0056660622,0.0065005664,0.0037502756,0.0019926045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007946212,0.00016383844,0.00033730248,0.00015661718,0.000039704642,0.0005586949,0.00051548745,0.039332874,0.0015506507,0.9006868,0.0045380075,0.052040473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010825839,0.000053619395,0.000110573776,0.000039807128,0.000025472116,0.00024808638,0.00015229364,0.34014004,0.0011975355,0.6406604,0.017233748,0.000030237752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024641613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017494039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017338287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002035524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022276656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058002293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394924014","doi":"10.1017/asb.2024.14","title":"Strategic underreporting and optimal deductible insurance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Astin Bulletin","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Concordia University","keywords":"Deductible; Actuarial science; Business; Economics; Econometrics","score_opus":0.0446281771141132,"score_gpt":0.22710856337539193,"score_spread":0.18248038626127872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394924014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73488927,0.0008084278,0.2195427,0.0071654813,0.0001312042,0.00014221804,0.00037902407,0.00016825084,0.03677339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99502474,0.00012514743,0.0031231525,0.000103501116,0.000025023968,0.000015514534,0.000028440965,0.000006260844,0.001548226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974558,0.0011904686,0.00012463606,0.00033641275,0.00037313468,0.0005196489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98971367,0.0058248653,0.002550164,0.0007820841,0.0007190153,0.0004102526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00344439,0.00045652717,0.0009208311,0.00057219906,0.0006246432,0.0022300049,0.001434954,0.0016455294,0.004992473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012508191,0.00047344595,0.00065380434,0.00053151674,0.0018070928,0.002028554,0.0010135623,0.0014918341,0.00033668772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025526516,0.00032895722,0.009333249,0.00014723274,0.000081960956,0.00073907955,0.00066226214,0.24502149,0.0026922051,0.71844816,0.00337212,0.018918118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008942751,0.00015491497,0.003390117,0.000060711005,0.000038346992,0.0003021734,0.0006020613,0.5770077,0.001003104,0.4149769,0.002328604,0.000045918463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003256499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015594355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004992473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002671143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019523081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01938057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395053572","doi":"10.1017/s0012217323000240","title":"Some Challenges for Moreau's Theory of Wrongful Discrimination","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Law and economics; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.06416886517685397,"score_gpt":0.24095496471231015,"score_spread":0.17678609953545618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395053572","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02309912,0.0052384147,0.050640043,0.56115055,0.001491589,0.00006197423,0.00009292288,0.00012526017,0.35810012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9237725,0.0016274233,0.01185147,0.034463197,0.0017168381,0.00016512684,0.000030176632,0.0000840676,0.026289241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910948,0.005466026,0.00024503033,0.0010469669,0.0015533416,0.00059382996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98896104,0.007905604,0.00045378628,0.0008573775,0.0013255521,0.0004965545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015360956,0.0004774869,0.0011701103,0.00233773,0.0070618223,0.0081446655,0.0031052022,0.010203009,0.0076121776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012431123,0.0004095126,0.001161785,0.0012206876,0.04602993,0.01356178,0.0052305185,0.009694375,0.00083833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015862374,0.0000039391693,0.00002012187,0.0000041628223,6.263262e-7,0.000010662203,0.00044417373,0.000057974783,0.0000049497953,0.9978198,0.0011696517,0.00046231822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004499706,0.0000045064226,0.00004812442,0.00003654136,0.000001460746,0.000016524526,0.00027557643,0.00045535527,0.000021969976,0.98495495,0.014175627,0.0000049012106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009827693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074712546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015360956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011829191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005317544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08582723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395063382","doi":"10.59403/1tvzyyw004","title":"Chapter 4: The Beneficial Ownership Test","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"WU Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law, tax law and policy series.","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Université du Luxembourg","keywords":"Test (biology); Business; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.056085484470129954,"score_gpt":0.24560510524998097,"score_spread":0.18951962077985102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395063382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031985627,0.0059101256,0.011310312,0.02408263,0.0020793427,0.00009032192,0.00027225717,0.000086786386,0.95296955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29167667,0.013356948,0.008493047,0.029759033,0.0075188745,0.00069866766,0.0008253219,0.0006112647,0.6470602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997719,0.00073071633,0.00007956989,0.00037179113,0.0008647087,0.0002342544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762136,0.0013974613,0.0001283004,0.00026037972,0.00049519417,0.000097257915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002063415,0.00061853504,0.00081582915,0.0009150068,0.0020646458,0.0056533534,0.0014737261,0.0029626302,0.05508158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00881612,0.00037870632,0.00094947446,0.0010544739,0.007297411,0.009666719,0.0026417219,0.0057765017,0.009418509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073959573,0.000011955205,0.000115498886,0.000046238536,0.0000027147091,0.000038554204,0.00025179825,0.000086854,0.00005253693,0.95000285,0.04055572,0.008827882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011078988,0.000022155155,0.00050367566,0.00032338267,0.000009812135,0.000105044375,0.0003880553,0.0003959527,0.0003286334,0.6678607,0.33003896,0.000012588235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030532442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020035745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05508158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023821294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021784273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18426621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396564015","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4810464","title":"Optimal Civil Justice Design","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Compensation (psychology); Private information retrieval; Mechanism design; Production (economics); Mechanism (biology); Welfare; Civil litigation; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Law; Computer security; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0250072648488113,"score_gpt":0.22222658785794647,"score_spread":0.19721932300913517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396564015","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10735236,0.0009999004,0.53221107,0.010346764,0.00044345862,0.00046990233,0.0005032929,0.00039872032,0.34727448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92621255,0.00031206294,0.03277959,0.0006659742,0.00016256928,0.00018035789,0.00008996338,0.000082050276,0.039514825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979367,0.0009964268,0.00006254631,0.0004049504,0.00027945655,0.00031984714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682295,0.0018896061,0.00021104126,0.00037997027,0.00043729265,0.00025916123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020949177,0.00055919983,0.00097455113,0.0008283301,0.001067562,0.003307969,0.0009371418,0.0029540423,0.021395369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010795801,0.0006051597,0.00045249483,0.00060391484,0.0017664244,0.0021874323,0.0012259078,0.0019404661,0.0013631936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006600284,0.00010010052,0.00029885353,0.000060867904,0.000030479598,0.00003463987,0.00007529225,0.034377567,0.00047336504,0.9364057,0.007863116,0.02021397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058781687,0.000060486866,0.00028217494,0.00002490994,0.000024830648,0.00003408547,0.0000721079,0.1259509,0.00036569856,0.86749446,0.005619956,0.000011570495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016300821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030622971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021395369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028070386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032375695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07157457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396591909","doi":"10.1017/cls.2024.1","title":"Le recours aux modes alternatifs de règlement des conflits : une exploration au prisme d’une analyse des coûts humains et financiers de la justice","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mental Health Commission of Canada","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03935406371376702,"score_gpt":0.27075028016228553,"score_spread":0.23139621644851852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396591909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33528417,0.0069922823,0.054074608,0.028686857,0.00017299793,0.00011277241,0.00031044596,0.000086459084,0.5742794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751545,0.0013808646,0.002962458,0.0005004873,0.000052760173,0.000040450082,0.000047881345,0.000032842556,0.019827623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971083,0.001125291,0.000082632665,0.000250694,0.0009666769,0.00046636345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942368,0.0023235395,0.0009132943,0.00039268914,0.001770642,0.0003629966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003072294,0.00039138808,0.00036911815,0.0026319518,0.005280988,0.013079116,0.0013432021,0.0020022343,0.01107931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063343216,0.00028462187,0.0004547854,0.0032017876,0.023237823,0.0053957826,0.002958222,0.0026596324,0.00059521355],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002548403,0.000015131278,0.0037074995,0.000093377304,0.000017977682,0.00024934308,0.04778977,0.0006532163,0.00040514744,0.9324144,0.0022267664,0.012401934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035915276,0.00006393669,0.046565782,0.0008018499,0.00006132235,0.0006919234,0.17493017,0.0060213436,0.0010814165,0.5235315,0.24609594,0.00011898934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2051125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26688364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.979712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020287968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010404739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40783727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686496","doi":"10.29173/mlj1124","title":"The Biases of Experts: An Empirical Analysis of Expert Witness Challenges","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Expert witness; Forensic psychology; Data science; Computer science; Empirical research; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Criminology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09406154424015317,"score_gpt":0.2775920270250328,"score_spread":0.1835304827848796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677022,0.0010777375,0.0068948995,0.002810338,0.00003430322,0.00019999058,0.00023355104,0.000008618579,0.021038407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99806327,0.000251984,0.0005909782,0.0002721789,0.000042275726,0.00006690449,0.000067608555,0.0000059536023,0.00063890713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9590269,0.026552308,0.002221671,0.0020516906,0.007878976,0.0022685716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.26294014,0.6414242,0.059973653,0.0145579735,0.01703448,0.004069574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043363586,0.00038276744,0.0007076211,0.0032464943,0.0024203416,0.0035586942,0.0017290226,0.002934733,0.005056814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43370968,0.0003705072,0.00054643763,0.00287326,0.003936583,0.007241339,0.005611883,0.0033262037,0.0005334927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019013778,0.001224335,0.7505938,0.000714707,0.00062944053,0.001947734,0.06310494,0.008240255,0.0013495618,0.081830606,0.0101541225,0.07830925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005434005,0.0014381093,0.6484186,0.001703927,0.0008039299,0.0037456395,0.14957291,0.03028971,0.0050239633,0.12727173,0.030928144,0.00025998577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026223138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029243438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043363586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017627833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031055517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22933131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396696261","doi":"10.3982/te5183","title":"Relational enforcement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"City of Vancouver; Hausdorff Center for Mathematics; Academy of Finland; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; University of California Berkeley","keywords":"Computer science; Enforcement; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027304828114342837,"score_gpt":0.21270229368036828,"score_spread":0.18539746556602543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396696261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045283932,0.0009998545,0.34016547,0.0106606055,0.00026804206,0.00063728687,0.00082154816,0.0011346142,0.6000287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8775081,0.0006171876,0.056124236,0.0016072503,0.00027889217,0.0003641928,0.0003247258,0.00014290586,0.063032545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98959523,0.0031377622,0.0009489034,0.0026401563,0.0026044387,0.0010735005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783594,0.006819784,0.003593407,0.007787714,0.0026977283,0.0007420299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008074651,0.00066645676,0.0007831958,0.0012810914,0.0032234676,0.0053591514,0.0025638859,0.0031348523,0.028316284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02845961,0.00071006245,0.0008637745,0.0014841076,0.0042872187,0.0051833927,0.0038643123,0.0026415475,0.0034157643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001682897,0.000030504147,0.00059108157,0.000040107498,0.000019051815,0.000072504336,0.00023128925,0.0010815056,0.00036468057,0.983452,0.0030247385,0.011075662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006866084,0.000054306387,0.0011426538,0.00012278746,0.0000466166,0.00025292765,0.00023460863,0.016313186,0.0014117335,0.8949975,0.08531282,0.000042135074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005882784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048145805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028316284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036402612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00468214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0947274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396886990","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4825704","title":"Pre-IPO Tokens: Trading in the Dark","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Initial public offering; Dark liquidity; Business; Monetary economics; Financial system; High-frequency trading; Finance; Economics; Algorithmic trading","score_opus":0.018388328465778703,"score_gpt":0.2215532022181143,"score_spread":0.2031648737523356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396886990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46421656,0.0018761458,0.019338721,0.02859749,0.0005921565,0.000054318527,0.0006609606,0.00034011266,0.48432356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97988886,0.0002446466,0.00066256826,0.00087173673,0.00015720222,0.000011703212,0.00006955094,0.0000650394,0.018028654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987387,0.0003281368,0.00004779631,0.00021669683,0.00030106385,0.00036766508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99334985,0.0030032343,0.0009500745,0.0010883899,0.0005664329,0.0010420899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021400861,0.00013187966,0.00043472394,0.00070630864,0.0021984251,0.009444043,0.00092138624,0.002578486,0.0290857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014537956,0.0003057049,0.0001867822,0.00082976633,0.0039565437,0.010035661,0.0025869787,0.004547981,0.0027031088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027205105,0.00007521831,0.0067412155,0.000044999542,0.000013290529,0.00039517038,0.0016272332,0.0004115469,0.0009709812,0.9468673,0.014659835,0.027921217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041506348,0.00006045235,0.006199256,0.00012136094,0.00002251897,0.00027670755,0.0039440943,0.0034321928,0.0013082114,0.9307492,0.05379908,0.000045389213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001911844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030397954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0290857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015443594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019299752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097301364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398133451","doi":"10.1111/1756-2171.12463","title":"Robust contracts in common agency","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The RAND Journal of Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Business; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05578355229508858,"score_gpt":0.2215754682165888,"score_spread":0.16579191592150022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398133451","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100865655,0.0006355289,0.8467129,0.002585466,0.00007239638,0.00019590657,0.00019289028,0.0001577583,0.04858157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9528755,0.00021859657,0.04154765,0.0001871361,0.00007172781,0.00017319032,0.00006305032,0.000037971357,0.0048252223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98462796,0.007978544,0.0007733243,0.0020349952,0.003307183,0.0012780244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9641191,0.021387095,0.0047937455,0.0053507737,0.0031113073,0.0012380505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01274949,0.0006761389,0.0011966154,0.00137564,0.0015352279,0.0045714136,0.0018648577,0.0033629634,0.005284416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045110747,0.0005611377,0.0013289397,0.0012468755,0.006870731,0.007449776,0.0032609673,0.0032386868,0.0005570329],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026010022,0.000015812448,0.00016475016,0.000018568982,0.000014664555,0.00007455924,0.000096731994,0.02623671,0.0002655027,0.96957,0.0003080352,0.0032087003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015592246,0.000026130308,0.000108053224,0.00001590381,0.0000068642307,0.000041895524,0.00004088421,0.08602268,0.00023816084,0.9119654,0.0015061877,0.000012274075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019725657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091015367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01274949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036759707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021027916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06742656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398147653","doi":"10.3386/w32456","title":"A Sharp Test for the Judge Leniency Design","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Computer science; Law; Political science; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.4988921677658905,"score_gpt":0.46279131226611064,"score_spread":0.03610085549977987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398147653","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17143162,0.0013953042,0.78457403,0.009161531,0.0007611229,0.002785996,0.0020540864,0.0008394663,0.026996903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9012464,0.0002757932,0.08841584,0.0034254706,0.00051590585,0.0024530524,0.0010013514,0.00009228756,0.002573841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8094844,0.121538885,0.009922673,0.027419433,0.027771551,0.0038629442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2671679,0.6499742,0.038790155,0.02586674,0.015775682,0.0024252033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1495321,0.001851713,0.005045443,0.0055859396,0.002591438,0.0061970707,0.0076092174,0.009884069,0.015812172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.56477726,0.0013925239,0.0053146826,0.004283375,0.016094536,0.010871632,0.005141155,0.01321764,0.0018857984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028248033,0.00086693204,0.12686776,0.0013349754,0.0034286245,0.0024393515,0.0020238003,0.03416196,0.0027290133,0.68684024,0.013663163,0.12281933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027480475,0.00402595,0.038442872,0.0004982019,0.0012632082,0.0015245457,0.0011630984,0.16768329,0.006623158,0.760014,0.015594851,0.00041884603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011480707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080988824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1495321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002330323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005097424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79081076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398152954","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4833932","title":"A Sharp Test for the Judge Leniency Design","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Political science; Psychology; Law and economics; Computer science; Law; Economics; Geology","score_opus":0.03257892504351566,"score_gpt":0.22738412635389627,"score_spread":0.1948052013103806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398152954","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22943091,0.0018857674,0.4128322,0.073034465,0.0027716847,0.0021073662,0.0024519379,0.0011144432,0.27437124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94205546,0.00024496092,0.029031886,0.010766831,0.0018601436,0.0010659158,0.00040809708,0.00014040197,0.014426235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9376449,0.03016803,0.0028221237,0.013964852,0.012646217,0.0027538564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6541857,0.29016998,0.013657234,0.02659682,0.010426824,0.0049633775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07636763,0.0015318147,0.005337154,0.0037581192,0.0042036027,0.0076751993,0.005960216,0.013763457,0.05045657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31724182,0.0011773148,0.0033594016,0.0021567168,0.01973165,0.013293388,0.005782971,0.013169118,0.0045660925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013236876,0.0002709481,0.012698072,0.00036391136,0.00053288194,0.00041490243,0.00064065994,0.0023209783,0.00077184464,0.93179846,0.015560312,0.03330336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016736188,0.0007071281,0.0064737387,0.00011173042,0.00035326305,0.00043810942,0.00040731215,0.020016512,0.0011541259,0.9571505,0.011424622,0.00008935936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089644454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007393549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07636763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026650513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044927653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40387547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398281744","doi":"10.7910/dvn/msnhls","title":"Replication Data for: Weaponizing Post-Election Court Challenges: Assessing Losers’ Motivations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Political science; Law; Computer science; Law and economics; Psychology; Sociology; Biology; Virology","score_opus":0.1264861476613084,"score_gpt":0.29123588262625677,"score_spread":0.16474973496494838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398281744","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010658486,0.000037100082,0.000118944314,0.00019412988,0.000045407316,0.000045301695,0.9967416,0.0001920793,0.0015596536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022417593,0.000029882785,0.00048755377,0.00008565256,0.000016355716,0.0002748056,0.9947744,0.000050356004,0.0020393415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986677,0.00024475768,0.00020576314,0.00030008107,0.00034970828,0.00023205148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99400514,0.0013147439,0.0008565039,0.0014101565,0.0019818938,0.00043158195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00215038,0.0010887588,0.0006443251,0.0029497326,0.001149132,0.0021824753,0.0021219754,0.0018118935,0.06156682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011956995,0.00048707856,0.0007339225,0.003808662,0.00052416977,0.0010883745,0.0017996227,0.0018141572,0.059474453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008990821,0.000059690836,0.005807183,0.00026935924,0.00002173684,0.000044576267,0.00007996876,0.000209403,0.0001199798,0.0008642097,0.9896774,0.0027565332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047282688,0.000036994737,0.031103421,0.00029976788,0.000029014027,0.00011222646,0.0005318813,0.0008823852,0.0006793626,0.0013585853,0.9644478,0.000045766472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038247086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07325013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06156682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015718545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027460011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20596153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398660920","doi":"10.7910/dvn/h7okej","title":"Losing control is not an option","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Resource allocation; Control (management); Resource (disambiguation); Business; Computer security; Computer science; Operations research; Political science; Engineering; Medicine; Computer network","score_opus":0.04081732756184442,"score_gpt":0.2349266148605471,"score_spread":0.1941092872987027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398660920","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3822833,0.0043058842,0.0065272967,0.016596524,0.0011105794,0.00042683093,0.4958265,0.0006934327,0.09222963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.687771,0.00084127137,0.002015445,0.0031269442,0.0003383997,0.0008543549,0.29163325,0.00017249893,0.0132468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99364835,0.0015936792,0.0007814806,0.0014387972,0.0013211301,0.0012165866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776128,0.006554223,0.008710072,0.0030312433,0.0027754407,0.0013161465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003105843,0.00049231865,0.00080194674,0.00230451,0.0014909585,0.003921402,0.0012749296,0.0011968771,0.020805305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02340121,0.00028533128,0.00074369466,0.005951154,0.0016986019,0.0033432501,0.0024848862,0.0029414447,0.003936469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087444566,0.00030076475,0.4988906,0.0010692956,0.0004582126,0.00020399243,0.0013489242,0.0020772747,0.00022288764,0.04381708,0.4113041,0.039432403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004370738,0.00020090971,0.46569908,0.0010965988,0.00024869016,0.0002743723,0.005390727,0.0031474656,0.0008300937,0.02531989,0.49720684,0.00014824768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035716116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03611111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035716116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017139203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020986183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07101643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398793153","doi":"10.29173/mlj911","title":"An Empirical Glimpse of Manitoba Civil Forfeiture Regulation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.031363725162917126,"score_gpt":0.23220422123286213,"score_spread":0.200840496069945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398793153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74349576,0.0047325077,0.002828904,0.024416462,0.00012650652,0.0002954753,0.0054431367,0.00008210093,0.21857908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94040847,0.003168702,0.0017129587,0.0034223073,0.00005675475,0.00014148295,0.0018399557,0.000052340703,0.049196985],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989009,0.0002532714,0.00003354397,0.00012444792,0.00031556556,0.00037228767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604475,0.0015145565,0.0007102447,0.00019766252,0.0011550132,0.00037783186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010826447,0.00028671353,0.0003254926,0.0043448526,0.004289275,0.002812447,0.0013769836,0.0009799681,0.011026953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047385814,0.00039639114,0.0002854205,0.009049391,0.002120861,0.0011259597,0.0018796803,0.0018689708,0.0010114864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022849748,0.0005630705,0.5589958,0.00052860304,0.00017119154,0.0031762861,0.032945476,0.003501156,0.0023676273,0.2197518,0.09594256,0.08182793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025094814,0.000079727426,0.79447675,0.0007327792,0.00007467204,0.0003412769,0.04843474,0.0032103306,0.0010161477,0.009854544,0.1416918,0.000062180785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84621626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9585963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15378374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019960096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023710515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30937874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398807991","doi":"10.7910/dvn/rj7vuq/jsbpdg","title":"Table G1.txt","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Table (database); Productivity; Database; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.028337425036983242,"score_gpt":0.21384601470613446,"score_spread":0.1855085896691512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398807991","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000044295775,0.000033949927,0.00002428167,0.000068724126,0.000021055155,0.000005156551,0.9991334,0.00016642401,0.00050270965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00037324883,0.000059173464,0.00013412836,0.000075979005,0.000022470726,0.000065937704,0.9980227,0.00011361765,0.001132848],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989033,0.00019135265,0.00014042125,0.0003481854,0.00020177607,0.00021510027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958832,0.001558445,0.00048238147,0.0008550156,0.00077265437,0.00044835726],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012347742,0.0025319264,0.0017546547,0.005053382,0.0010201043,0.0050014113,0.0034318245,0.002587641,0.34723085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012449173,0.00092645985,0.0012038316,0.010793886,0.0006064068,0.0026246856,0.003031921,0.002457315,0.30652133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022777564,0.000012289578,0.00039162236,0.00027888114,0.000012389487,0.000007668372,0.000011787772,0.000108660504,0.000014992954,0.00031587092,0.9979907,0.0008322698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035679093,0.000016192495,0.0028984211,0.00039072026,0.00002553883,0.000034276338,0.00009844185,0.0003836735,0.00013835568,0.0023226386,0.99330986,0.000025272799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019766714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032094374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65276915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017345259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022256717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93109596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398832873","doi":"10.7910/dvn/rj7vuq/2wsmij","title":"List description sectors.tab","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Productivity; Database; Accounting; Business; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Macroeconomics; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.036759049786143215,"score_gpt":0.2140312064630123,"score_spread":0.17727215667686907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398832873","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000031675318,0.000060003003,0.000025198504,0.00005649747,0.000023792823,0.0000049994514,0.9986203,0.00021016315,0.00096733053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00031430114,0.00012283021,0.00012802445,0.00009112146,0.000020272853,0.00005171703,0.9974274,0.00019805624,0.0016462267],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873143,0.00017167757,0.00015446893,0.000456554,0.00022387218,0.00026214027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964888,0.0009713672,0.0003445798,0.0008281907,0.0008394729,0.00052754977],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009202891,0.0026133833,0.0025867021,0.007080015,0.0011303142,0.005621073,0.0034240477,0.0024797583,0.41417176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00960839,0.0010929711,0.0012083759,0.016421715,0.0006201539,0.0035690165,0.0034822659,0.0024130738,0.4682739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020430447,0.0000074069508,0.00025232625,0.00026392168,0.0000070419865,0.000005645992,0.000008872005,0.000057359786,0.00002324872,0.00040831932,0.9979818,0.0009636414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015883459,0.000010538314,0.0015003984,0.00031178392,0.000013741905,0.000025218118,0.00006358181,0.00015189657,0.00012814514,0.0015453136,0.996073,0.000017569928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017610246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021611113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58582824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019474752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026289432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8356129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398927290","doi":"10.7910/dvn/rj7vuq/pdaiov","title":"Enterprise surveys_judicial_reforms.tab","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Productivity; Judicial reform; Database; Political science; Business; Accounting; Economics; Computer science; Law; Economic growth; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.026959741601161845,"score_gpt":0.22495940412302134,"score_spread":0.1979996625218595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398927290","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010689424,0.000045266013,0.000045796973,0.00007736982,0.000015038885,0.000005423916,0.9987386,0.00027226622,0.0006934232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00068861037,0.000078109704,0.00017034276,0.00005670757,0.000019742653,0.00007438304,0.99754286,0.000093379305,0.001276039],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987779,0.00019836337,0.0001512195,0.00027708738,0.00032342225,0.0002720812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959971,0.0010463996,0.0007294364,0.0009144385,0.0008750541,0.00043750412],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013873251,0.001986508,0.0014560936,0.006156915,0.0006547721,0.0036724585,0.0030545983,0.0024124552,0.1537415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009957376,0.00096619484,0.00091415236,0.012849193,0.00043312582,0.0017190212,0.0025325671,0.0021751556,0.14923045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024651485,0.000015850228,0.0009142247,0.00022250837,0.000013822666,0.000007305808,0.000015198727,0.00013932347,0.000017833234,0.0006115279,0.99633944,0.0016783428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033004952,0.000018305831,0.007850716,0.00038032563,0.000024895618,0.00003438677,0.00009241053,0.0005424995,0.00022952216,0.002003351,0.98846465,0.000028995219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029483978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038763452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8462585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019686643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025723358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51431656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398944502","doi":"10.7910/dvn/rj7vuq/kg4sl4","title":"Contract intensity.tab","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Productivity; Intensity (physics); Database; Business; Economics; Computer science; Macroeconomics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.029128289854096268,"score_gpt":0.21727057242746922,"score_spread":0.18814228257337295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398944502","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001059453,0.000061113504,0.0000239063,0.00006322646,0.000019534988,0.000004117319,0.9989004,0.00026649304,0.00055520656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000771055,0.00009514591,0.00014606377,0.00006407727,0.000021815544,0.00004573709,0.99769527,0.000109743734,0.0010511152],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988649,0.00015301886,0.0001347726,0.00033835077,0.0002613991,0.00024757432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691856,0.00077049143,0.00049449876,0.00088387117,0.0005423398,0.00039019136],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010333571,0.0030213732,0.001876666,0.006139573,0.00090429507,0.004791514,0.0040179514,0.0035625752,0.20542015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076832543,0.0010015492,0.0015258073,0.010380303,0.00056803366,0.0024591577,0.0027287495,0.00286491,0.20416434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003953919,0.000025340752,0.00088780414,0.0003384341,0.000019495765,0.000010081134,0.000013240056,0.00018709768,0.000026893997,0.0005161382,0.9965953,0.001340658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005041828,0.0000281325,0.0055252193,0.0005094405,0.000031301006,0.00006228262,0.00010024826,0.00081883755,0.00024685368,0.0027742728,0.9893646,0.000034630604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024291836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03297921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79457986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021141195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002526978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6871989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398946010","doi":"10.7910/dvn/yg9wlm","title":"Institutional Proximity and Judicial Corruption: A Spatial Approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03448153485730724,"score_gpt":0.2144882550308034,"score_spread":0.18000672017349617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398946010","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00583688,0.00017040374,0.0003509774,0.0004465121,0.000035619847,0.000039947387,0.98870754,0.00013835057,0.004273771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015496978,0.00013056521,0.00090488495,0.00013172899,0.00002879772,0.00020067356,0.9794845,0.00005656734,0.003565309],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986652,0.00036582325,0.00015967025,0.00021611502,0.00033441567,0.00025881323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995462,0.0013251203,0.0010670254,0.0008979309,0.00094882475,0.00029905964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012281587,0.000640101,0.00071561016,0.004662042,0.0008852257,0.0023147594,0.0019636406,0.0017369019,0.03564264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008864633,0.0003324036,0.0006306199,0.0075298348,0.0004448945,0.0009300679,0.0020950134,0.0015024794,0.02622046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105157,0.000097927215,0.016047793,0.000333138,0.00003926624,0.00010281856,0.000120947276,0.0012794946,0.000093561226,0.0053438004,0.970831,0.00560521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035235437,0.000040868967,0.077103525,0.00051346986,0.00007214031,0.00033725228,0.0011174201,0.0033386466,0.00068928907,0.0058274087,0.9105436,0.00006393802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042759646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07817128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042759646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014350996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013292594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11923653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398956110","doi":"10.7910/dvn/rj7vuq/qjbmeh","title":"Figure 2e graph_va_perwo_ppp_trim1_DJ4g1m=1_pre trends.png","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Productivity; Database; Graph; Business; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.030826205215289445,"score_gpt":0.22428379107043975,"score_spread":0.1934575858551503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398956110","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001351585,0.000047340105,0.000042128693,0.00011220357,0.000038026617,0.0000043858395,0.997575,0.0003600132,0.0016857177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000984306,0.00008921221,0.00018780954,0.00009316525,0.000018781302,0.00003598838,0.99570894,0.00018597358,0.0026959234],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934465,0.00009056834,0.00005310992,0.00020550027,0.00014791144,0.0001581961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789643,0.00057112676,0.00024372604,0.0004799916,0.00062018546,0.00018849249],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055027165,0.0018461146,0.0009146062,0.0048512486,0.0007463173,0.0030166267,0.0017451663,0.0015295249,0.30299285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006237664,0.0006158234,0.0011016274,0.009313258,0.00036726572,0.0015561419,0.0017965108,0.0017069636,0.2645058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014757682,0.000007600212,0.0006886207,0.00014694464,0.000009699862,0.000007101845,0.000009249524,0.000118440315,0.000020834883,0.0003775321,0.99759406,0.0010050922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001628938,0.000010342777,0.0049571055,0.00023778179,0.00002008653,0.000043776847,0.00009409508,0.00042246,0.00019061059,0.0017109526,0.9921301,0.000019754872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033105105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060436852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6970072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012121951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017697394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398957045","doi":"10.7910/dvn/rj7vuq/hj8w6b","title":"IATI_judicial reforms_coding_clean.tab","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Productivity; Coding (social sciences); Political science; Database; Judicial reform; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Computer science; Biology; Sociology; Macroeconomics; Social science","score_opus":0.0313703535724319,"score_gpt":0.22452574746636123,"score_spread":0.19315539389392933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398957045","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007732042,0.00004804012,0.000035285037,0.00006943912,0.000017635444,0.0000048008083,0.998838,0.00024655715,0.0006628879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004457825,0.00006150751,0.0001479551,0.000045878078,0.000013422713,0.000052190797,0.998221,0.00008334237,0.00092897454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881977,0.00016741187,0.00013599434,0.00029645005,0.0002875318,0.00029282476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966536,0.00079690956,0.00056135777,0.0008378369,0.00077455107,0.00037579783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011531959,0.0023481213,0.0014774428,0.006631205,0.00083436567,0.0042552273,0.0036329147,0.002550562,0.16658619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00855592,0.0008735637,0.0011623722,0.012147456,0.0005549539,0.0017986097,0.0026256058,0.0023891202,0.17295396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021571404,0.000011965476,0.00064435555,0.00023804803,0.000012480178,0.000007349337,0.000012766832,0.00013396973,0.000019129859,0.0005313981,0.99713033,0.0012367285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023067165,0.0000129056825,0.005311797,0.00043046812,0.000026226702,0.000034655517,0.000088791756,0.0005119617,0.00026372488,0.0021828297,0.9908755,0.000030418285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032502595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04857263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16658619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002334064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034456225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5572863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398969631","doi":"10.7910/dvn/rj7vuq/ecb0av","title":"Figure 2b graph_h7a_DJ4g1m=0.png","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Productivity; Database; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.02639721215985914,"score_gpt":0.21384073068362733,"score_spread":0.1874435185237682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398969631","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010278834,0.00006679609,0.000039546514,0.0001216847,0.000047029516,0.000008028846,0.99807066,0.00036978655,0.0011736721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006176433,0.00008545726,0.00020712604,0.00011782556,0.000019951369,0.00005540023,0.99711406,0.00016437528,0.0016181514],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991904,0.00011756037,0.00006721206,0.00027559517,0.00017805732,0.00017114445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718577,0.0009447608,0.00023704859,0.00060364546,0.0007281355,0.0003006691],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006813922,0.0026264964,0.0013072038,0.0056728334,0.0011370352,0.0033615476,0.0025694072,0.0028631901,0.3721848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007510574,0.0006798488,0.0015065101,0.008125396,0.0006061525,0.0017352616,0.0022930303,0.0019543774,0.2770066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024781844,0.000012734515,0.0004434255,0.00033830604,0.000013451214,0.000011256458,0.0000137456245,0.00010485426,0.000043049546,0.0003226152,0.99777657,0.00089517026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032582946,0.000017037077,0.0029545375,0.00038185052,0.000033473803,0.00005391942,0.00011180922,0.00042057008,0.00025714684,0.0022611567,0.9931564,0.000026278902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031919293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06521483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6278152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016105858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024368104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89550215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398992134","doi":"10.7910/dvn/rj7vuq/xhzx9s","title":"Judicial_reforms_Map world.do","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Productivity; Political science; Judicial reform; Law; Economics; Biology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.026288913403694887,"score_gpt":0.22378864930146622,"score_spread":0.19749973589777134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398992134","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009792798,0.000071656716,0.000032261054,0.00009847003,0.000019743407,0.0000032202297,0.9984699,0.00033364826,0.0008730694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00075667206,0.00013016358,0.00014410514,0.0000605471,0.000017634986,0.000041873172,0.9976012,0.00012264408,0.0011251755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991374,0.00012429483,0.000090116926,0.00021785566,0.00020743177,0.00022278854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723804,0.0006259751,0.00052882324,0.0007089707,0.0005116398,0.00038655166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008630382,0.0022939502,0.0013580674,0.0069122585,0.00077291,0.004774701,0.003512962,0.0023714246,0.15766567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072782994,0.00088293484,0.0010167694,0.012539251,0.0005783348,0.002463219,0.0030134476,0.0022658783,0.16583754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023198152,0.000011024718,0.0008439281,0.00026156753,0.000014181571,0.000009699042,0.000018518846,0.00015518497,0.000015979369,0.00068567495,0.9964552,0.0015058295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015260543,0.000008784709,0.0039656195,0.00038212625,0.000019117995,0.000028046505,0.000092365524,0.00046722783,0.00016138602,0.0020344278,0.99266195,0.000026274136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03663175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05391775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15766567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018016221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026148602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52744424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399002410","doi":"10.7910/dvn/rj7vuq/kxd2gi","title":"contract_intensity_IO_1997_clean.tab","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Productivity; Database; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Computer science; Economic growth; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029883761658161815,"score_gpt":0.21916688935786435,"score_spread":0.18928312769970254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399002410","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008096856,0.000058050005,0.000025375386,0.00006957502,0.000017454908,0.00000350839,0.99895346,0.00022227666,0.0005692993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00058496423,0.00009045146,0.00011743563,0.000051403735,0.000016628283,0.000046109002,0.99787986,0.00010176843,0.0011113425],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891376,0.00013220437,0.00012216181,0.0002750815,0.00030024865,0.00025657026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971986,0.00066157425,0.0004948156,0.00070913165,0.0005969427,0.00033899295],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010803378,0.0024707303,0.0017188468,0.005839894,0.00080614584,0.0047925054,0.0038357982,0.0028820385,0.16448769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007483821,0.00093583774,0.001237691,0.01153048,0.000545723,0.0020375117,0.002329432,0.0025005927,0.1757292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028497416,0.000015770553,0.00068918057,0.00029147477,0.0000162637,0.0000093296385,0.000011854139,0.0001756101,0.00001913509,0.0005594861,0.99707866,0.001104712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031525228,0.000014768103,0.0048019625,0.00040450715,0.00002596024,0.000037984333,0.00008232879,0.0005471126,0.00022265372,0.0020582925,0.99145776,0.000031392454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036366995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04420548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8355123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023889893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003083173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55026615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399017835","doi":"10.7910/dvn/rj7vuq/vxydbn","title":"USAID_Rule of Law and Human Rights_clean.csv","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Productivity; Rule of law; Political science; Law; Human rights; Database; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Computer science; Biology; Economic growth","score_opus":0.030105899467428723,"score_gpt":0.2270565240294118,"score_spread":0.19695062456198306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399017835","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000093216186,0.000073805924,0.00003188142,0.00012341356,0.000025795056,0.000004211943,0.99854386,0.00024116905,0.0008626607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00070056465,0.00011676065,0.00014082572,0.00007757802,0.000019945452,0.000046104728,0.9977836,0.00009032327,0.0010243014],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984706,0.00020689517,0.00017721306,0.0003105417,0.00045384324,0.0003808841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579936,0.0011363542,0.0007266046,0.0010495266,0.000873551,0.00041456887],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012088363,0.0026586738,0.001764391,0.006675546,0.0010748811,0.0054872865,0.004153653,0.0036017047,0.14526886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010264751,0.00093002676,0.0014805623,0.011492955,0.00071537663,0.0027939063,0.002834323,0.0033468332,0.15615682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023487242,0.000014521275,0.0007653733,0.00024767534,0.000014177289,0.0000094954885,0.000010560181,0.00015149795,0.000011272097,0.00070261204,0.9970906,0.0009586447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002905383,0.000013009652,0.0051766154,0.0005405888,0.000027190057,0.00005857865,0.00010049308,0.00073383434,0.00022141405,0.0034310017,0.98937184,0.00003496954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035976186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052129876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85473114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024956914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036349953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48597276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399314803","doi":"10.7202/1106134ar","title":"LITIGATION PRIVILEGE -RECENT DEVELOPMENTSAND FUTURE TRENDS","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assurances :","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Political science; Engineering ethics; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.030990672506314636,"score_gpt":0.2053595213792906,"score_spread":0.17436884887297596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399314803","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08413405,0.5358708,0.0047963504,0.26600915,0.0009048503,0.00004862547,0.0011981776,0.00019666196,0.106841385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71724385,0.25530416,0.0016039282,0.008485625,0.0020619284,0.000023337627,0.0005010662,0.00004908097,0.014726988],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967547,0.00031477914,0.00023260993,0.0004778562,0.0015030312,0.00071698736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795934,0.006649355,0.0045794146,0.0005735988,0.0052795527,0.0033246316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004774298,0.00022286618,0.00052684755,0.0040296176,0.0020486074,0.007726079,0.001474044,0.0022233392,0.011494911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013560389,0.00032649646,0.00037498842,0.0070151063,0.007684938,0.0065105553,0.0024800214,0.0023583567,0.00077243627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015623235,0.0001619319,0.056526687,0.0019274642,0.00003506598,0.00049532304,0.004740153,0.0015953034,0.0009950603,0.2679558,0.029298306,0.63611275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020088937,0.0001491364,0.20316395,0.0017906886,0.000030117144,0.0010095093,0.00538643,0.0016430612,0.00067527534,0.044826876,0.7411833,0.0001215382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37171057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4208767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37171057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033741623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022068387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73909396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399656354","doi":"","title":"Confidential-DPproof:Confidential Proof of Differentially Private Training","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; Leverhulme Trust; UK Research and Innovation; Alfred P. Sloan Foundation; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research; U.S. Department of Defense; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alan Turing Institute; Government of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Confidentiality; Computer science; Computer security; Training (meteorology); Internet privacy","score_opus":0.024720024436607015,"score_gpt":0.2135414239450414,"score_spread":0.18882139950843438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399656354","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016724927,0.0004021161,0.9703725,0.0017555144,0.00019248493,0.000275488,0.00059823936,0.0025516106,0.00712707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8058647,0.00038763645,0.1852879,0.0010341808,0.00020585323,0.00041713196,0.000738928,0.0004703364,0.0055933604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828091,0.005955125,0.00094454584,0.0029012656,0.0055430667,0.0018469031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9219373,0.040804986,0.003795563,0.028883342,0.0033536192,0.001225235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012761247,0.0010358766,0.0015171545,0.0011113611,0.0017109961,0.0042135087,0.0042342125,0.002896456,0.007584362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074098535,0.0010890331,0.0016786556,0.0011795925,0.0052317395,0.008939788,0.00870247,0.006427478,0.0018942775],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011115042,0.00043234573,0.0035810499,0.00063844805,0.00019851718,0.0005440585,0.0007689291,0.15635724,0.014848136,0.6322473,0.020064581,0.16920778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032384973,0.0003729116,0.000636022,0.00016514857,0.000059531892,0.000670206,0.000116416246,0.46581984,0.028933756,0.48750603,0.015285432,0.00011081408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012352902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011024636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012761247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025885098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006853963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06748873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399749653","doi":"10.1093/wbro/lkae007","title":"A Survey of Judicial Effectiveness: The Last Quarter Century of Empirical Evidence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The World Bank Research Observer","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Empirical evidence; Demographic economics; History; Economics; Archaeology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24091656038204182,"score_gpt":0.37122567605974843,"score_spread":0.13030911567770662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399749653","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15042895,0.7744611,0.0032835645,0.030892719,0.00069855,0.00006662875,0.0055609043,0.00006381949,0.034543775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6900583,0.29769585,0.0015475043,0.0046267784,0.0020606087,0.000056444416,0.0029141884,0.00007345995,0.000966784],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9710959,0.012271885,0.004851695,0.0030693745,0.007845633,0.00086558436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5720322,0.2752265,0.080036804,0.012630613,0.05576018,0.004313661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029809568,0.00045538298,0.0010954312,0.018767599,0.00068057637,0.005280169,0.001910456,0.0018005377,0.004965514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1224715,0.00082313706,0.00075339375,0.025346251,0.005541252,0.005177551,0.0019367795,0.0026465973,0.0013869235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056297315,0.00036668003,0.43093768,0.011737463,0.0013865626,0.00023168935,0.0020535595,0.0016767075,0.00040018285,0.030705677,0.044542283,0.47539872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058224567,0.0004182174,0.8109967,0.01970222,0.000656251,0.0008654627,0.0042386577,0.0015042301,0.0010085087,0.009907956,0.1504988,0.00014470625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003774049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034006243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029809568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028935983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024769278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15764993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399790949","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4868624","title":"Optimal Civil Justice Design","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Computer science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03110783411217851,"score_gpt":0.23134377612236542,"score_spread":0.2002359420101869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399790949","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10577643,0.0012211856,0.5639569,0.011079431,0.00046645573,0.0005013045,0.00062159117,0.00040459665,0.315972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9230318,0.00038427755,0.03586247,0.00071771344,0.00018821907,0.00020103918,0.00010859305,0.000087101485,0.03941865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775475,0.0010911737,0.00006945132,0.00045161022,0.0002976973,0.00033530014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99657756,0.0020582175,0.00024091531,0.0004194389,0.00043184037,0.00027205457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023017554,0.0005735827,0.0010309647,0.0008138628,0.0010408612,0.0032980416,0.0009731663,0.0030365947,0.02146767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109168375,0.00061089854,0.00045736975,0.0006425747,0.0017579995,0.00223199,0.0012665626,0.002060244,0.0014081354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069305745,0.00009849854,0.0002828218,0.000068485184,0.000032104086,0.000034446763,0.000067900655,0.033869486,0.00051571435,0.9371875,0.007848796,0.019924957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006316401,0.00005722447,0.00029159733,0.000026041565,0.00002473618,0.00003442956,0.00006451296,0.11865414,0.00039315256,0.87468874,0.005690345,0.000011967136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014849062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027210694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02146767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028949648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031251365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071816444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399793557","doi":"10.1093/oxartj/kcae001","title":"The Sun Is God: Turner,  Angerstein, and Insurance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Art Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.02133002238697082,"score_gpt":0.21328852074444032,"score_spread":0.1919584983574695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399793557","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01975764,0.050559793,0.0008827006,0.72500074,0.0068926145,0.000012268526,0.0001476635,0.000047201167,0.19669937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7450771,0.04757094,0.00074107485,0.06274083,0.017177712,0.000021984644,0.000107298234,0.00012885247,0.12643422],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984054,0.000530137,0.00005500587,0.0001435462,0.00064455334,0.00022135467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99375397,0.0041104504,0.00052536494,0.00018744024,0.0007125923,0.0007101621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027282631,0.00012613025,0.00029860882,0.0010112383,0.0030525168,0.00873201,0.00037832273,0.0029865864,0.016991012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020099621,0.00019115862,0.00011587381,0.0014907811,0.007106781,0.004660252,0.0012832817,0.0032201416,0.0010655893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040702922,0.000019736332,0.0017791105,0.00005078069,0.0000062810545,0.00016063354,0.0027689894,0.00012346188,0.00002695461,0.43805683,0.5333427,0.023623845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025915355,0.000013861611,0.0057501127,0.00071880664,0.000018066383,0.00045959503,0.006458841,0.0004270282,0.000100818484,0.3486403,0.63734543,0.000041166906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024356842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027412284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024356842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033709814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004551235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0568406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399925426","doi":"10.1093/9780198921677.003.0003","title":"Devices for Deference","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06128105395474293,"score_gpt":0.22282488077199294,"score_spread":0.16154382681725002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399925426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007838201,0.0054249996,0.12356257,0.014714627,0.0012891042,0.00013972243,0.00025876547,0.0002543444,0.84651774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75588036,0.0042636017,0.04421059,0.009776935,0.0026350766,0.00090597774,0.0002957482,0.00047576593,0.18155599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97603023,0.009672426,0.0014076086,0.0029081185,0.008486733,0.0014948377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742424,0.014219273,0.0010526401,0.0059415814,0.0039683064,0.00057571934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017285671,0.00091777457,0.0011675745,0.0032410028,0.0046612076,0.013423694,0.0029587245,0.006245611,0.014687483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047011796,0.0010160906,0.0010662605,0.0015618264,0.028510164,0.0138703715,0.008009952,0.012406619,0.0038371775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002348608,0.000002199158,0.000013547618,0.00000797397,0.0000010423464,0.000013045626,0.0002128643,0.000053760556,0.000021006688,0.99712723,0.0009670572,0.0015778068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011894834,0.000016026288,0.00006156401,0.00014753488,0.000007089756,0.00008861845,0.00012379474,0.00034928203,0.00017857189,0.9057848,0.09321714,0.000013703162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026627989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016741339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017285671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056476737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004857892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09141648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400152299","doi":"10.1787/c2dae409-en","title":"Presenting Complex Economic Theories to Judges ","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"OECD competition law and policy working papers.","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positive economics; Epistemology; Psychology; Sociology; Economics; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0556553088375443,"score_gpt":0.2687135589487661,"score_spread":0.2130582501112218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400152299","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018014885,0.005997745,0.53508687,0.10360059,0.0057158526,0.000167618,0.0006362323,0.0006241127,0.33015615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6816673,0.010376861,0.20855983,0.008365209,0.0072956705,0.0009998786,0.00080505764,0.0005416961,0.08138853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99354714,0.0045178323,0.00022361567,0.00041027437,0.0010308799,0.00027021242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783825,0.017346648,0.00092246186,0.0016215576,0.0013780163,0.0003487427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010332194,0.0007004097,0.001009072,0.003340042,0.0036841787,0.010582295,0.0016196357,0.0034961614,0.016668307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04124509,0.0006739486,0.0012288311,0.0028142785,0.007952513,0.00940149,0.0056766677,0.006440625,0.0023079421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022326437,0.0000051464076,0.000039291386,0.000016069993,0.0000034322543,0.00002311851,0.0003403179,0.0013026921,0.000020527643,0.98825663,0.0059792968,0.004011113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000527132,0.0000036996098,0.00003312151,0.000059714595,0.0000028271718,0.000010213139,0.00018913698,0.0047938125,0.000058105285,0.96503764,0.02979881,0.000007662005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024771811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037873012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016668307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004604617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002917962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0557611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400152407","doi":"10.1787/6bef709b-en","title":"Improving International Co-operation in Cartel Investigations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"OECD competition law and policy working papers.","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"FP7 International Cooperation","keywords":"Cartel; Business; Industrial organization; Collusion","score_opus":0.05850132034098859,"score_gpt":0.2646469152929091,"score_spread":0.20614559495192053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400152407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06585061,0.015463114,0.04647834,0.17319329,0.0028688428,0.0015928316,0.00036697503,0.00071101816,0.693475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89184827,0.0043713106,0.022448061,0.024767896,0.0018832498,0.0016563396,0.00066367316,0.0007316471,0.051629443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6814479,0.21136369,0.013205891,0.017039787,0.043291464,0.033651263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44740015,0.3164335,0.04369296,0.057841845,0.09043615,0.04419531],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.24108124,0.0009990057,0.0017646159,0.012462821,0.018970404,0.044989612,0.00522345,0.018710736,0.02735466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3877722,0.0015667224,0.0012428145,0.014784192,0.019682392,0.040965404,0.0468303,0.01770339,0.007119457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018790671,0.00029300092,0.011944,0.00044382073,0.00011141028,0.0009587077,0.015864866,0.0027343328,0.00043333296,0.7345465,0.10137552,0.1311066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023958877,0.00017999165,0.013179816,0.003260644,0.000110140696,0.0008712423,0.02224088,0.0040815035,0.0018323621,0.299034,0.654724,0.00024577856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009553134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010828516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24108124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017805256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06553925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.935882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400152483","doi":"10.1787/3f5b4e2d-en","title":"Cartels: Sanctions Against Individuals ","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"OECD competition law and policy working papers.","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Archer Daniels Midland","keywords":"Sanctions; Computer security; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.04827928555942144,"score_gpt":0.2578425910215637,"score_spread":0.20956330546214227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400152483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024706919,0.0065495525,0.0034721836,0.050750785,0.0040254933,0.00020399177,0.00085657,0.00023421163,0.90920013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54838806,0.005149376,0.002619794,0.08063117,0.0031166626,0.0003812136,0.0006449735,0.00015309721,0.35891572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874765,0.00303479,0.0003867092,0.0009501744,0.005285477,0.0028664202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905618,0.0045803473,0.0012960063,0.0005830613,0.0022616247,0.0007171424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0082597695,0.00075506885,0.00045030762,0.0020513146,0.0067506973,0.008453161,0.0015999555,0.012927183,0.013109385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02478296,0.0003818086,0.000663489,0.0023953686,0.0040387525,0.003077669,0.0034494807,0.007992674,0.0024742703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010234925,0.000045040484,0.0017737292,0.00010815186,0.000027683242,0.00058345357,0.0017888737,0.00073853106,0.00035260606,0.67158407,0.29199275,0.030902734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008313752,0.000092337985,0.004859229,0.00052406604,0.000047680613,0.00027350936,0.0014179678,0.000931952,0.0014781716,0.03829535,0.9518975,0.000099187564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066053614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08520076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066053614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006525272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007921939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1313383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400153023","doi":"10.1787/78c4eb25-en","title":"Procedural Fairness: Issues in Civil and Administrative Enforcement Proceedings ","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"OECD competition law and policy working papers.","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Administrative law; Public administration; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.06406336808872,"score_gpt":0.2781208348624434,"score_spread":0.2140574667737234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400153023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019569589,0.015595866,0.02719684,0.45436117,0.0042338087,0.00023277845,0.0004973704,0.00015824882,0.47815436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8351065,0.0077902703,0.010837175,0.083757654,0.010975487,0.00051478733,0.00027464936,0.00034819302,0.05039525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8143078,0.09437462,0.01155298,0.009821021,0.054137092,0.015806597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72108424,0.21468104,0.015580122,0.012653659,0.031205755,0.0047951145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12201904,0.000704642,0.001296047,0.005963895,0.018727643,0.04397663,0.0054606493,0.030877851,0.008237683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29062307,0.0010189106,0.001473623,0.009491113,0.025885914,0.021197531,0.0075047077,0.020781593,0.0014105042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013904472,0.000018528894,0.00019592086,0.000038500668,0.0000070953397,0.000063961925,0.0021173381,0.00018957473,0.000031809934,0.9709338,0.019908182,0.006481249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064876214,0.000035735982,0.0018178568,0.0010948833,0.00004243858,0.0001665912,0.0044118413,0.001094483,0.0006038959,0.71256745,0.27797183,0.00012808316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033075273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023135552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12201904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023937846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03657092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64530605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400230807","doi":"10.26422/ripi.2024.2000.sch","title":"El informe de peritos y la similitud substancial en casos de plagio","year":2024,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Iberoamericana de la Propiedad Intelectual","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SNC-Lavalin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011526720162748229,"score_gpt":0.24690684085109257,"score_spread":0.23538012068834435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400230807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9029304,0.011534411,0.012248353,0.0071858787,0.0004136864,0.00030754364,0.00067559985,0.00029053586,0.06441359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666989,0.005155414,0.0034546237,0.00075442495,0.000089576046,0.00014466722,0.0003218579,0.000045577075,0.023334907],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973552,0.0010576634,0.00018332414,0.00029326868,0.00083667337,0.00027383553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906929,0.004750224,0.0021823007,0.00059275643,0.0014720075,0.00030986458],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002390017,0.00056329026,0.000538503,0.0016960689,0.0013061322,0.0038757944,0.00059511827,0.0016854545,0.01344118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013043766,0.0003162819,0.00062341295,0.00089510676,0.0020306797,0.0021322952,0.0019312524,0.0013897617,0.0018499881],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045074793,0.0013806236,0.2260663,0.0037280857,0.00048315251,0.011583665,0.12892585,0.0026165075,0.02983696,0.02189102,0.015665952,0.55331445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012912667,0.0046946798,0.4682773,0.0037853466,0.0008968208,0.016405417,0.24511532,0.005394121,0.03542356,0.02680041,0.19268146,0.00039645092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005409765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006400127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99831456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002162181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018817255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044965208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400446792","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2024.12081abstract","title":"Navigating the Maze of Psychological Contract Breach with Swift Informational Intervention","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Proceedings","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Swift; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Psychological contract; Breach of contract; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law; Programming language","score_opus":0.03238476908134537,"score_gpt":0.28096659301096116,"score_spread":0.2485818239296158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400446792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852642,0.00012894704,0.008623966,0.0014844709,0.0000118297485,0.000095154246,0.00003414828,0.00002140788,0.0043358523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976458,0.00004819401,0.0018804141,0.00011757996,0.000007727185,0.000037752485,0.000014372502,0.0000030745182,0.00024512102],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879417,0.008594037,0.00042674656,0.0007562223,0.0011941417,0.001087159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92419386,0.046779506,0.019942058,0.004809244,0.0017391221,0.0025362375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013954424,0.00027694282,0.0005071481,0.0009098099,0.0022664452,0.0044196704,0.0011664585,0.0011916108,0.0041063963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07671127,0.00036983,0.00035887893,0.00095926924,0.0032492003,0.0038551895,0.0045892783,0.0029767642,0.00023395062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013038347,0.0072658495,0.694532,0.00044625983,0.0003382898,0.0006880398,0.033149432,0.018629165,0.0025728235,0.0586928,0.0021758948,0.18020569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041826873,0.0049995854,0.7283452,0.0007256975,0.00043315117,0.0004546994,0.065313466,0.07635753,0.004306389,0.104988545,0.0134028625,0.00025475665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054352935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007819943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013954424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018517439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005418824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073798954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482675","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v3i1.69811","title":"Applying a Holistic Approach to Contract Cheating: A Canadian Response","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto; McMaster University","keywords":"Cheating; Business; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0871242243520436,"score_gpt":0.2662636382489698,"score_spread":0.17913941389692623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482675","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052502666,0.005884176,0.014300007,0.5766824,0.0020013982,0.00044766843,0.00018617556,0.00015262012,0.3478429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8452605,0.0074507263,0.01645394,0.082053155,0.00030082275,0.00023911374,0.00014268182,0.00010798082,0.04799103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9633442,0.008627356,0.00077186496,0.0025792979,0.015147251,0.009530069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97558343,0.0047739963,0.0008631121,0.0011112583,0.012248201,0.005419938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023579553,0.00090919674,0.00065186125,0.003853068,0.0517793,0.016798526,0.00406858,0.010420324,0.0055555254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026988033,0.0006536738,0.00090562075,0.005247432,0.039183713,0.005674012,0.016687449,0.015634766,0.00035849167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033646913,0.000067880275,0.0041812705,0.00022838154,0.00003366903,0.001121858,0.093904525,0.0016467206,0.0008145998,0.7284284,0.10816707,0.061371893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004056055,0.0000669179,0.008304398,0.00060541445,0.000042121836,0.00040221598,0.121620476,0.0018985239,0.0005482167,0.09490083,0.7713539,0.0002163831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97369516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98548466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97369516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22941229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.49092373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89377254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482755","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74233","title":"Contract Cheating in Canada: How it Started and How it’s Going","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Business; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03798606861107763,"score_gpt":0.22548952875391715,"score_spread":0.18750346014283953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482755","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042667106,0.10336606,0.0020230946,0.6274504,0.009179268,0.00015682617,0.001730263,0.0003571337,0.2130698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44615784,0.120343395,0.0033889916,0.094155066,0.0013951501,0.0001424055,0.0015549286,0.00079278665,0.33206952],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99216366,0.0006691856,0.00013580252,0.00043389824,0.00368839,0.0029090713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98767716,0.0009099093,0.00043980495,0.0001578782,0.005740062,0.005075244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032439446,0.00073343725,0.0007495646,0.0037299849,0.041403364,0.020059861,0.0024896944,0.004941116,0.021633744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008981752,0.00070740667,0.00063589175,0.0097840745,0.011502807,0.007435788,0.005063099,0.009563356,0.0022992294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043991018,0.00006799188,0.009909158,0.000551331,0.000033223077,0.00070146564,0.066969156,0.00026545886,0.00029726056,0.04961906,0.751637,0.11990485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004315573,0.000013417666,0.011398519,0.0006478958,0.000015764677,0.00017811419,0.0769497,0.000120523604,0.00016591733,0.0022825343,0.90813476,0.00008855863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7836896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21631037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3705083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9089689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482772","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74333","title":"Editorial: Contract cheating in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Business; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01787191941224858,"score_gpt":0.2345226814950828,"score_spread":0.2166507620828342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482772","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009041093,0.01657656,0.00008932208,0.18489859,0.7856298,0.000033739372,0.00022281964,0.000054483266,0.012404189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006046073,0.027823826,0.00026028496,0.11006194,0.7773036,0.000059091053,0.00022819085,0.00016627081,0.07805069],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874746,0.00082144205,0.0005533725,0.00083694654,0.009199917,0.0011136828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564488,0.009922698,0.0010493525,0.0007143671,0.028569004,0.0032957785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00584555,0.002581502,0.0025284402,0.00622656,0.010911293,0.010372443,0.004249237,0.014465775,0.015705477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039897267,0.0007487583,0.001651927,0.0048945057,0.0061427713,0.0031358402,0.0013013007,0.016140025,0.005529325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041997437,0.000001474575,0.000009183587,0.000027742086,0.0000020864882,0.000018025334,0.000014965747,0.00001141441,0.000005646756,0.00034125496,0.99854624,0.0010178023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013656203,0.0000029597165,0.00022580051,0.0002974524,0.000015890375,0.00004508531,0.00008742308,0.00006351897,0.000033480475,0.0006646293,0.9985336,0.000016583665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4875812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6618134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5124188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041473247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062853724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9694863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400519800","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4891647","title":"The Impact of AI and New Technologies on Corporate Governance and Regulation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Accounting; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.02011223751279554,"score_gpt":0.22368807626715412,"score_spread":0.20357583875435858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400519800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3101612,0.02579574,0.019325953,0.060367063,0.0005487243,0.00006683682,0.00036203527,0.000111407826,0.583261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98810184,0.0037261648,0.0009885711,0.0012019377,0.0005962773,0.000021176791,0.000026325453,0.000013905998,0.005323802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945827,0.0029626673,0.00016420303,0.0005284836,0.0010687112,0.00069316314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9414452,0.047707077,0.0046869935,0.002096277,0.0027083897,0.0013559808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064605754,0.00026210333,0.0004940446,0.0017942478,0.0012313401,0.0075450456,0.0007954551,0.0030802258,0.011468694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025981504,0.00022591703,0.0004274674,0.0019748576,0.008373843,0.0070301523,0.0017486596,0.0030027223,0.0005247359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000821524,0.00011562134,0.0059053744,0.00008732627,0.000038470505,0.00009993138,0.00040270426,0.004053065,0.00043853556,0.96341306,0.002089806,0.023273919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003692614,0.0000934541,0.01692566,0.000108329376,0.000032162494,0.0001039728,0.0008851019,0.006847115,0.0004924204,0.95486194,0.019581405,0.00003151888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061014644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059081954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011468694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004479713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002122763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038366556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400879675","doi":"10.7202/1112505ar","title":"Mixing Oil and Water? Redrawing the Limits of Contract Freedom After the Criminalization of Usury","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Usury; Criminalization; Mixing (physics); Freedom of contract; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics; Philosophy; Theology; Physics; Islam","score_opus":0.04398418003195922,"score_gpt":0.2442726013845402,"score_spread":0.200288421352581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400879675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039857272,0.0556489,0.00472303,0.33268505,0.0033398676,0.00013417922,0.0004787811,0.00008864029,0.5630443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7480442,0.018450435,0.0024203954,0.09305055,0.001647887,0.00016446544,0.00016102895,0.00014171643,0.13591932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874117,0.0029015134,0.0007314978,0.0014607094,0.0038210393,0.003673666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882316,0.005649564,0.0012026316,0.0015961297,0.0025949953,0.0007249682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01123738,0.00032253642,0.0007640473,0.0012473156,0.010536257,0.012352558,0.0023111876,0.018525783,0.006511515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03326506,0.0007111324,0.00064099656,0.0012354449,0.029706964,0.01354809,0.0056097414,0.012939893,0.0012871762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005128497,0.000015298463,0.0003574838,0.00004947229,0.000008258366,0.00014518046,0.0024566562,0.000083414656,0.0002086585,0.9499039,0.03702,0.009700455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045480625,0.000059266855,0.005209462,0.0008670657,0.000059761038,0.00022674115,0.007198284,0.0003055238,0.0023108118,0.3541152,0.6294388,0.00016362013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31183437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42944258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31183437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023164963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028871667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62003857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400880635","doi":"10.7202/1112507ar","title":"Considérations sur l’équité en matière de pertes et préjudices","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.041809242749812146,"score_gpt":0.2662487581204763,"score_spread":0.22443951537066417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400880635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017740315,0.13802226,0.031844817,0.19232391,0.0044495505,0.000089445835,0.00080568687,0.000096558346,0.6146275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7230897,0.04939291,0.016454987,0.044927016,0.009590286,0.00028302,0.00044441767,0.0002593341,0.15555838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.976546,0.006105449,0.0017681123,0.0019392014,0.011601641,0.0020396458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9670708,0.014266076,0.0023969181,0.0023492277,0.012869748,0.0010472814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020205142,0.00067546935,0.0011152639,0.0040450143,0.0054369234,0.010740872,0.0036954293,0.008861571,0.0132727325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056937657,0.0009212216,0.0011073401,0.0031794142,0.0246173,0.010346847,0.0037782374,0.009839987,0.0021681397],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017462982,0.000011146737,0.00049615616,0.000078488556,0.000012318655,0.0000883257,0.0006132156,0.00025829606,0.00010371869,0.9695124,0.019180238,0.009628343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010401006,0.000027540334,0.0032727204,0.0005544268,0.00003076592,0.00045012502,0.0008192772,0.00046406005,0.0003454991,0.7732208,0.2207557,0.000048694103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08151231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1036474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08151231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012919512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00940117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1620757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401180009","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4900833","title":"Out-of-Court Public Debt Restructuring and Debtholder-focused Investor Communication","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Debt restructuring; Debt; Business; Financial system; Accounting; Political science; Finance; Sovereign debt; Law","score_opus":0.0331459643904149,"score_gpt":0.22763051892614142,"score_spread":0.19448455453572652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401180009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78270125,0.00092039997,0.0029937346,0.015014117,0.00008049532,0.000034875804,0.0002451194,0.000037995927,0.197972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955959,0.00012352361,0.000048500642,0.00026806895,0.00005468744,0.0000026858252,0.000017946384,0.0000030224508,0.003885626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826604,0.0005976904,0.00008036574,0.00018263156,0.00029027057,0.00058313995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9671332,0.020371437,0.008816468,0.0011373962,0.0012370275,0.0013044175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021385115,0.00011552826,0.000314758,0.0008452152,0.0010838417,0.0046153674,0.00058989745,0.0027393743,0.021034036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030628778,0.00016081118,0.00015126044,0.0009160548,0.0013983786,0.0034558347,0.0015399328,0.0023590748,0.0010696546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001058044,0.0015406625,0.17183626,0.0001588903,0.00010660841,0.0034035966,0.011048791,0.004632552,0.0018053969,0.65317506,0.03571839,0.11551578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002617343,0.00035891196,0.24832506,0.00025427816,0.00019462299,0.0019717694,0.017357856,0.019659014,0.0032672202,0.67536753,0.032871727,0.00011029618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004615856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071326955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021034036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018506064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014853276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070365846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401484044","doi":"10.1111/corg.12610","title":"The Litigation Cost of Cross‐Listing Into the United States","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Corporate Governance An International Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of New South Wales; Florida State University","keywords":"Listing (finance); Corporate governance; Business; Accounting; Finance","score_opus":0.07447490579209433,"score_gpt":0.2975339156203116,"score_spread":0.2230590098282173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401484044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794223,0.0007761122,0.00074692455,0.0025330188,0.00003240318,0.000033719563,0.000768128,0.000024894374,0.015662521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99852705,0.00016400962,0.00013471599,0.00013640123,0.000014271264,0.0000044350763,0.00024687673,0.0000017088588,0.0007705182],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808866,0.00041718068,0.00013994018,0.00019964101,0.00063680136,0.0005177637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98176986,0.0070956736,0.0076793456,0.00049633643,0.0017115795,0.0012472388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020497104,0.00017552954,0.00030029353,0.0008168681,0.0008655562,0.0029013252,0.0006267354,0.0012091778,0.0062785717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015668612,0.00018099512,0.0005443227,0.00091457315,0.00056296337,0.0012713633,0.00089863344,0.0013562706,0.000283224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074435526,0.00074229704,0.8685843,0.000103223676,0.00030885712,0.0010716079,0.00047096974,0.040759794,0.0012532943,0.02344114,0.005900283,0.056619827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000102288424,0.0009618896,0.904999,0.00014090046,0.00034065737,0.0012798895,0.002679553,0.07203049,0.0024599035,0.008184108,0.0067053386,0.00011597253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07974242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10171368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07974242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005616722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026711265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15855658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401535618","doi":"10.7202/1107417ar","title":"LE FORMULAIRE DE CONSENTEMENT À LA RECHERCHE : INCOMPATIBILITÉ ENTRE LE DROIT DES PERSONNES ET LE DROIT DES CONTRATS","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05421696572203341,"score_gpt":0.2371407919829362,"score_spread":0.18292382626090278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401535618","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054517075,0.033535328,0.1703315,0.4087198,0.0029436524,0.00054480217,0.00048668883,0.00020874236,0.32871246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84082574,0.014466473,0.05918249,0.030791026,0.0018976409,0.00074328633,0.00029437,0.00013055591,0.051668417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8888262,0.07081307,0.005879902,0.0066661034,0.024788514,0.0030262563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80805516,0.13636091,0.010439721,0.023297433,0.019761572,0.0020852627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07232179,0.0007012319,0.0012950697,0.0019256731,0.004453933,0.010142368,0.002617025,0.0121484855,0.009032504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22677258,0.00077045354,0.001277932,0.0023505823,0.030898891,0.013615699,0.0074183666,0.010453591,0.0017186333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005217562,0.000018094424,0.0007857061,0.00013644672,0.000021026506,0.00017773552,0.0027342609,0.00027578353,0.00027762653,0.9632896,0.0075970995,0.024634358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014068806,0.00015932653,0.0027614075,0.0012022251,0.000074498654,0.0013116003,0.0021702924,0.0019517689,0.002329038,0.8065196,0.18125981,0.00011977266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013293713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067935763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07232179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008354143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018288096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3824787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401782500","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198852285.003.0027","title":"Bars for Non-Fraudulent Misrepresentation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05154452424020368,"score_gpt":0.20744318422507543,"score_spread":0.15589865998487176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401782500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02509788,0.0039458103,0.018051032,0.01716001,0.0015312259,0.00007182815,0.00008075078,0.00029700674,0.9337645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6972554,0.0014008299,0.006245467,0.005737793,0.000885586,0.0001368306,0.000087737004,0.00017325584,0.28807718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99041253,0.002824937,0.00023445932,0.00048098637,0.0049768067,0.00107025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833723,0.007936773,0.001433267,0.002215573,0.004320304,0.00072181894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057402286,0.00043336023,0.00056551525,0.0027669852,0.0032046791,0.008718255,0.0019708495,0.004632945,0.019232608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02398328,0.00035161639,0.00048454187,0.0010638173,0.008152777,0.004584162,0.004311438,0.0069734044,0.0051166923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023230052,0.000032663476,0.00035467214,0.000047130146,0.0000040683567,0.00012107377,0.0013964581,0.0001798058,0.00025967753,0.9452105,0.023058433,0.029312259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023758521,0.0000919608,0.0027327943,0.0010149645,0.000027572642,0.0006049799,0.0015157877,0.0023558168,0.0026005774,0.39741424,0.59153944,0.00007809435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017265315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027559928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019232608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034332355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002892711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06433946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401919656","doi":"10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.08.006","title":"Strange case of Dr. Bidder and Mr. Entrant: Consumer preference inconsistencies in costly price offers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Research in Marketing","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Business; Economics; Advertising; Microeconomics; Marketing","score_opus":0.1296840613860133,"score_gpt":0.3426461864147602,"score_spread":0.2129621250287469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401919656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6707434,0.0014299784,0.02879534,0.23650369,0.0011887854,0.00035576816,0.00035545547,0.00032871065,0.060298905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438237,0.00032597003,0.011886754,0.035248354,0.0003811063,0.00015852717,0.000065700006,0.00007377557,0.008036125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944459,0.0030663337,0.00023878548,0.0008302664,0.0010168509,0.000401801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97971135,0.013268797,0.0021620472,0.002274494,0.0013387125,0.001244625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010677017,0.00034979422,0.0008034659,0.00056912185,0.0028350777,0.0028733558,0.00095846294,0.0060150595,0.0060447794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045941446,0.0004896034,0.0007025071,0.0004959473,0.0036566088,0.0037254624,0.001708941,0.009176075,0.00095048454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006383147,0.001746926,0.08403437,0.00040769784,0.0003408651,0.040105842,0.042458966,0.0041741086,0.014146978,0.5160837,0.14074436,0.14937308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001603137,0.0034685053,0.064568594,0.00064467295,0.00050353364,0.05227499,0.045696344,0.04790949,0.023019101,0.45669436,0.30244935,0.0011679282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031979885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032438473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010677017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014903132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088337745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056466162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402051133","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4941492","title":"Backtesting Expectile: Disentangling Unconditional Coverage and Independence Properties","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Econometrics; Economics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.025231405085902794,"score_gpt":0.2170727755574459,"score_spread":0.1918413704715431,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402051133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72855884,0.0009229959,0.24751018,0.0052540614,0.000108980625,0.00008631476,0.0020313472,0.00084061886,0.014686716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99364716,0.00015995248,0.004112833,0.00025433648,0.00016232546,0.0000379647,0.00060208363,0.00016935937,0.0008539956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791191,0.013884974,0.0007478422,0.0026713992,0.0017204856,0.0018562393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3252251,0.6363404,0.012599428,0.019937608,0.0024854175,0.0034120695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044674337,0.0009999254,0.0036229694,0.0028647806,0.0017892852,0.0047394857,0.0031908038,0.0024556897,0.01716113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29799363,0.0009297122,0.0023314685,0.0029373332,0.005967017,0.014665666,0.004553448,0.007113375,0.0011859253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030324631,0.00103423,0.26682323,0.0006096984,0.002115065,0.0020225346,0.0031690383,0.05114582,0.001163592,0.53948826,0.019954836,0.10944126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027690874,0.0004052192,0.023111662,0.000109047876,0.000516874,0.0005990714,0.0007632,0.22145429,0.0016293776,0.74877155,0.0022889832,0.00007389478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002679683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025202287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044674337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009184823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015136797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23626328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402057687","doi":"10.1061/9780784485576.054","title":"The Art of Managing Contracts: Insights from the City of Toronto Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Outfall","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health; Hatch (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Outfall; Bay; Environmental science; Civil engineering; Business; Engineering; Environmental planning; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.027616010213766404,"score_gpt":0.20846025167468188,"score_spread":0.1808442414609155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402057687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25783923,0.009337545,0.006445062,0.21889932,0.00024774278,0.00019016086,0.00051402027,0.000043755936,0.50648314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646707,0.005645143,0.0014259062,0.0032307517,0.00009233384,0.000040496852,0.00011165046,0.00004366969,0.024739351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932701,0.0030298352,0.0001818358,0.00031860018,0.0014982682,0.0017012334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98120904,0.011576653,0.0015027907,0.00055271375,0.0029008433,0.0022579257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006227699,0.0003195617,0.0004709853,0.0015832047,0.03045637,0.019238058,0.0027059552,0.00474481,0.006890245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016190646,0.00046917232,0.00029202248,0.004605052,0.022567933,0.0047758976,0.0043025264,0.005253122,0.00041032286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053833734,0.000072815645,0.009012712,0.00018435004,0.000022560096,0.0031910127,0.21960257,0.0042144153,0.00020606745,0.67056495,0.06141412,0.03146062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002812549,0.00003558183,0.016818494,0.00062275265,0.000024824845,0.00036860156,0.4619741,0.0042351577,0.00016867554,0.0781507,0.4374911,0.00008194571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90065366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95400476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90065366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11247311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08410417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81605333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402162096","doi":"10.1007/978-981-99-5634-0_13","title":"The Theory of Moral Entitlement in IPS","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.04202880766310535,"score_gpt":0.20576988096276014,"score_spread":0.1637410732996548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402162096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008520891,0.002513525,0.074608065,0.0076823696,0.0005540497,0.000032471515,0.00011714202,0.000066613626,0.9059048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7700949,0.003144905,0.020761024,0.0029279592,0.0019352712,0.00023621981,0.0001581267,0.00016283015,0.2005788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804026,0.0008737334,0.00006785141,0.00023515141,0.0005353964,0.0002477276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806255,0.0011169584,0.000139043,0.00035213775,0.00023727988,0.00009197309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002598192,0.0005283149,0.000708041,0.0012079915,0.0027211145,0.005387521,0.0015027655,0.0034637444,0.014036308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063464916,0.00051849196,0.0006743081,0.0011405412,0.012542422,0.007732534,0.0017897622,0.0056102015,0.0018907702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.275849e-7,0.0000012389806,0.0000072041507,0.0000025906045,5.116023e-7,0.0000041088665,0.000034753593,0.0001158642,0.000004870316,0.99830735,0.00072964473,0.0007912702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.834112e-7,0.0000013527966,0.000032784144,0.000009131775,7.7363563e-7,0.000013084755,0.000021223388,0.00045551013,0.000015958205,0.99339175,0.0060558454,0.0000017339419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019455927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015912403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014036308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029832856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017494756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046956122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402269827","doi":"10.4324/9780429196676","title":"Delay and Disruption in Construction Contracts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.020163499058608505,"score_gpt":0.20682710861255188,"score_spread":0.18666360955394337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402269827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010449202,0.03199541,0.029425237,0.02486933,0.002928763,0.00012549982,0.00033829766,0.00015656644,0.8997117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3093897,0.026346145,0.0054727285,0.0029742322,0.0016306699,0.00017877256,0.0002517121,0.00017876728,0.65357727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969445,0.00069157185,0.00013715739,0.00026535202,0.0016077555,0.00035372598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615896,0.0020674586,0.0004110486,0.00039344246,0.00068716076,0.00028188463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020561952,0.00039057445,0.00035905087,0.0009517446,0.002127454,0.0065131434,0.0008698766,0.001870986,0.015354667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0126497485,0.0003768069,0.00038036995,0.0026782115,0.0045834226,0.0055683907,0.0020938814,0.003696725,0.0025286903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014721973,0.000010072283,0.0002828102,0.000050274226,0.0000022139357,0.000052062336,0.0012524525,0.0011577134,0.000051383067,0.92066693,0.055597417,0.020861894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005751903,0.000017778737,0.0006369176,0.00017788685,0.0000041710564,0.00014950387,0.0012229249,0.0010758061,0.00006398188,0.24353702,0.75309473,0.000013424306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0116935335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073811226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015354667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009524446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075723194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06910503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402464108","doi":"10.11159/cist24.175","title":"Law, Optimal Control and the Problem of Interpretation in Legal Conflicts In The Healthcare Industry; The Appraisal Of Having An Algorithmic Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Control (management); Health care; Healthcare industry; Computer science; Management science; Operations research; Law; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.011179187948720271,"score_gpt":0.21869847781704385,"score_spread":0.20751928986832358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402464108","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027979657,0.02731177,0.56188303,0.25991642,0.0013303098,0.0002425417,0.00015415682,0.00010096459,0.12108109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8238431,0.011393536,0.1482934,0.0059421128,0.0028515693,0.0005203333,0.00009393573,0.000117485644,0.0069445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828279,0.012412483,0.0005489955,0.0014628045,0.0019383301,0.0008094793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631822,0.03146398,0.002003411,0.0012901719,0.0012327413,0.00082753925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01942784,0.0010989064,0.0017790993,0.0026684364,0.004439804,0.012087612,0.00400104,0.0126202125,0.0052592508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04576128,0.0009543411,0.0013999562,0.0024803458,0.053372823,0.02102218,0.0065413746,0.010219767,0.0003805611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009289406,0.000018538169,0.000114356015,0.00004925521,0.000007898138,0.00003338204,0.0002120406,0.007987259,0.000016632155,0.98688114,0.0008576047,0.003812527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007260547,0.000004400281,0.000042665524,0.0000365771,0.0000025170941,0.000012142672,0.00014598492,0.0100762015,0.000016141212,0.98799455,0.0016557189,0.00000583973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00584593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034656213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01942784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009483877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077014575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10274547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402575690","doi":"10.4324/9781003550143-19","title":"‘Law and Economics’","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.030804739785146463,"score_gpt":0.19031536065798482,"score_spread":0.15951062087283835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402575690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012975764,0.20932797,0.0044758613,0.05459209,0.0024004194,0.00002085032,0.00011611299,0.000070537135,0.72769856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21367304,0.13849714,0.005940332,0.041629307,0.011320288,0.00017942202,0.00031406438,0.00023597943,0.5882105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998716,0.0006002773,0.000030549265,0.00018010571,0.000334899,0.00013816361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986754,0.00085031934,0.000098766555,0.00013361304,0.00016697188,0.00007477913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012336415,0.00073634466,0.00048771902,0.001918421,0.0024098838,0.0058819386,0.0007701244,0.002852575,0.012712793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003601703,0.00030537398,0.00029159765,0.001937448,0.014221342,0.006599731,0.0017445965,0.00446779,0.003979999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004110017,0.0000054727075,0.00006162335,0.000042595348,0.000002090074,0.000018999486,0.00045642056,0.00009190746,0.00002657548,0.91730946,0.072004244,0.009976451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034587679,0.0000053465405,0.00023486931,0.00018697059,0.0000012885433,0.00004747964,0.00027798678,0.00012116756,0.000035905607,0.43474206,0.5643394,0.000004108219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061874725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066021727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012712793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061598453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029591925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044692993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402730289","doi":"10.1017/lsi.2024.21","title":"Lawyering in Hard Places: Comparative Dispatches from the Margins of Legality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14868775982350022,"score_gpt":0.29482703207084443,"score_spread":0.14613927224734422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402730289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42523628,0.0021399627,0.00086556404,0.020008283,0.0002723491,0.000075754644,0.00031874343,0.000018113635,0.55106485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842552,0.00036356694,0.00008105361,0.0005922766,0.00007561313,0.000024989458,0.000051085175,0.000024033228,0.014532266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99395293,0.0026076667,0.00012881806,0.00034370914,0.0008991406,0.002067763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835993,0.0075793047,0.0023487518,0.0006349967,0.0019772693,0.0038604205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040978272,0.00020305897,0.0005323384,0.0039030768,0.008811409,0.012010456,0.0013110134,0.0022276605,0.080733664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02975922,0.00025731,0.00029045035,0.0045003425,0.007225211,0.009977963,0.0070904507,0.0034195534,0.0028215218],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071527937,0.0005498815,0.028493203,0.00027025735,0.000058631427,0.0008925607,0.1628313,0.0005978307,0.00033111928,0.7009686,0.04037777,0.06391348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012685319,0.00020486298,0.14759947,0.0007596481,0.000061228864,0.00019307269,0.67169404,0.00075274985,0.00029678384,0.071378,0.106876336,0.00005701092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023441592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059946835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080733664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009126807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004069343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27008098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402827180","doi":"10.1007/s40804-024-00326-5","title":"How It Matters Who Makes Corporate Rules","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Business Organization Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"European Union law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Accounting; European union; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.04183563129541753,"score_gpt":0.2022427152253638,"score_spread":0.16040708392994626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402827180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25580445,0.0033387777,0.017168013,0.12219645,0.0007434603,0.00020312112,0.00012791423,0.000099878846,0.60031796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875343,0.00047603316,0.0009542999,0.0048356378,0.00015416586,0.000030138717,0.00001951829,0.00004090224,0.0059550703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9136108,0.046292815,0.0038888708,0.0067011793,0.0213615,0.008144838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79916006,0.15267584,0.015704758,0.008513921,0.018657912,0.005287568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0506618,0.00024543592,0.00080180314,0.0022898677,0.007701767,0.027427806,0.0022934952,0.007512853,0.006264988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11962909,0.00050054264,0.00046739957,0.0014762684,0.02786615,0.0131767485,0.0043222024,0.0065775127,0.0013262616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061830535,0.00011754766,0.013668232,0.00016822404,0.00006752738,0.00067535136,0.02103283,0.0015535132,0.0007798529,0.92491966,0.011256124,0.02569934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096631906,0.00012188838,0.023588149,0.0009841698,0.00015295914,0.00042625706,0.04524457,0.0033099677,0.0033190402,0.70134676,0.22123167,0.00017794305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01485863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011113687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0506618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008690434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0109835705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26792842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403096186","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4942336","title":"Distributionally robust insurance under the Wasserstein distance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Econometrics; Mathematics; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.020385782197857548,"score_gpt":0.21256538793105476,"score_spread":0.1921796057331972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403096186","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27264526,0.0017614842,0.69092554,0.007572832,0.00022969452,0.00005770019,0.0005989526,0.00054832274,0.025660152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713922,0.0007981637,0.018497534,0.00040205178,0.00038152176,0.00006343554,0.000269959,0.0001563038,0.008038774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543923,0.0017836579,0.00022769361,0.00082590024,0.0011833335,0.000540204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771379,0.014901,0.003103388,0.0021236495,0.0015138356,0.0012201829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007266846,0.0007460294,0.0023810407,0.0018443099,0.0010186926,0.003929417,0.0019948217,0.003454937,0.004663292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03441895,0.00075006916,0.0010843797,0.0011929214,0.0051534465,0.008250861,0.0036608533,0.003146407,0.0005047041],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040293606,0.000024916482,0.00052110496,0.000033401837,0.000033009102,0.00006450504,0.00004855574,0.02924948,0.00043593318,0.96391666,0.00081910397,0.0048130234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011380587,0.000020672991,0.00037264707,0.00000855639,0.0000057549237,0.000035461395,0.0000124498065,0.10866473,0.00010498922,0.8904205,0.0003288469,0.00001388912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027122304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011329176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007266846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031442554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001730662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038431227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403779557","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v26i5.7296","title":"Discretionary Accrual in the Knowledge-Based Economy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accrual; Knowledge economy; Business; Economics; Accounting; Economy","score_opus":0.02239512773763079,"score_gpt":0.2114714869159894,"score_spread":0.18907635917835863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403779557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88021433,0.0035014667,0.018589772,0.003972193,0.000053011132,0.000046946367,0.0002550219,0.00007811603,0.0932892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719894,0.00041328798,0.0005931634,0.000055362165,0.000037914604,0.0000044479384,0.000030226283,0.000004353064,0.0016623475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992105,0.00027232055,0.00006203273,0.000098600125,0.00019125346,0.00016523378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99216604,0.003935145,0.0022654347,0.0006230207,0.0004620464,0.0005483095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016706438,0.00013848722,0.00030716092,0.0012298948,0.00061629777,0.0036323299,0.00041390143,0.0006427952,0.0038716376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011245101,0.00018876199,0.00019028319,0.0015398521,0.002066052,0.0049310243,0.001037429,0.00083852303,0.0004955759],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012493224,0.00028242823,0.08360849,0.00008091727,0.000029989027,0.00037547326,0.0009988954,0.02654346,0.0009180744,0.8228849,0.0026895457,0.061462812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024390578,0.000037169702,0.08172301,0.00006387465,0.0000184406,0.00018900345,0.00063037,0.0210597,0.0004203142,0.8878096,0.007986754,0.000037460803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042078127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024365704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042078127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001396306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095473893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01295197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403975849","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2024.72.3.pf.ross","title":"Policy Forum: Sailing Beyond the Sunset? Are De Jure Control and Other Bright-Line Tests Relevant After Deans Knight and the New GAAR?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Knight; Sunset; Line (geometry); Control (management); History; Physics; Management; Optics; Astronomy; Mathematics; Economics","score_opus":0.009304097879271242,"score_gpt":0.18336143230493887,"score_spread":0.17405733442566762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403975849","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008628143,0.0039214045,0.0010385595,0.89173895,0.0034551795,0.000045767443,0.00014903225,0.000042259802,0.09098064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22135866,0.0037191806,0.0014465513,0.69635534,0.004295082,0.00012951334,0.00013803266,0.00010773321,0.07244986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9693363,0.007955008,0.0008835814,0.0043584155,0.008348931,0.009117931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94198054,0.036517426,0.003890024,0.0017267482,0.0091108205,0.006774524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032050677,0.00047680945,0.0010278225,0.0013374245,0.02194283,0.021338595,0.0044348766,0.03428954,0.01476484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0782046,0.000631755,0.00070278964,0.0013498263,0.022716526,0.009746444,0.003549423,0.019854233,0.0023512612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000769909,0.00008940953,0.003961845,0.000117300195,0.000024955081,0.0006697275,0.00644934,0.00021462327,0.00027574605,0.6128226,0.34641057,0.028886877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011807424,0.00006567774,0.006999615,0.00085726316,0.00008711248,0.00021518455,0.014748615,0.0005253856,0.00083521224,0.10283299,0.8724852,0.00022957582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4805527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5061303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5194473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030574149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10039261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95551115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404081325","doi":"10.1163/30504856-00402004","title":"Efficiency and Values in the Constitution of Civil Procedure","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of procedural law.","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Civil procedure; Political science; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.01736926016492787,"score_gpt":0.23303100342597638,"score_spread":0.2156617432610485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404081325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06657932,0.0033863373,0.20665158,0.02441857,0.00038959074,0.00020719461,0.00019514316,0.00012258947,0.69804966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96657825,0.0007444769,0.01810001,0.0014504238,0.00042013635,0.0003471421,0.00010957706,0.00008659765,0.0121634435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94714904,0.027942507,0.0029454597,0.006365267,0.011132562,0.004465174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.937582,0.04007652,0.004299589,0.011610884,0.0052954964,0.0011355582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034437537,0.0005672578,0.0013981389,0.003698566,0.006354595,0.01784298,0.0021497693,0.0060654166,0.0058194795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06931387,0.0007229411,0.0012113532,0.0036188955,0.066296674,0.017610427,0.0074698087,0.0080481805,0.0009849619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018481156,0.0000025535974,0.00006972411,0.000004513038,0.0000019767742,0.0000039877286,0.00016780698,0.00018304226,0.000009389489,0.9985806,0.00011137972,0.00086338626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005792492,0.0000067270903,0.00022641258,0.000034982975,0.0000035124633,0.000011907421,0.0001925097,0.00042381408,0.0000866706,0.9933548,0.0056458185,0.000006995467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029078217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020874487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034437537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009223596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008817237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18212527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404134701","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5013452","title":"On the Dark Triad and Wrongness Admission: An Exploration of Associations in Scenarios, Hypotheticals, and Daily Life","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Triad (sociology); Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.049279915730117876,"score_gpt":0.2533845837937563,"score_spread":0.20410466806363842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404134701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8787043,0.001304803,0.027776143,0.028606955,0.00004534605,0.0000561767,0.00045671966,0.000042928645,0.0630065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833053,0.00026041103,0.0008478584,0.00012319471,0.000022955881,0.000014827553,0.00007382458,0.0000056814856,0.00032066833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967584,0.0025620703,0.00009080452,0.0002179455,0.00016904602,0.00020178012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93205225,0.058614913,0.004717378,0.0016484875,0.0010917919,0.0018752608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050164065,0.00026807768,0.0005790391,0.0023566228,0.0022673307,0.006403887,0.0014046817,0.002625104,0.013167006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051972754,0.0003176626,0.00043363293,0.004524899,0.008923133,0.013547612,0.004089759,0.0032796317,0.0004258728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014218308,0.00017204252,0.031814836,0.00005745308,0.000032951146,0.00028752247,0.0059063253,0.004170473,0.000045997316,0.94633836,0.0015400688,0.009491717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016985005,0.000026037178,0.007728917,0.000046424924,0.000018545006,0.00018351154,0.008415717,0.012851958,0.000024382529,0.9683975,0.002271782,0.000018116154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051359846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004641361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013167006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019383342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013112649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04404801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404172141","doi":"10.1016/j.jet.2024.105926","title":"Commitment and investment distortions under limited liability","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Theory","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Liability; Investment (military); Limited liability; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Actuarial science; Finance; Monetary economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03241462503756364,"score_gpt":0.23473196772823088,"score_spread":0.20231734269066723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404172141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83371246,0.0015532023,0.03370272,0.016792614,0.0001287343,0.00009009689,0.00031642534,0.00009292381,0.113610804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952609,0.00020662953,0.00048749577,0.00017981877,0.000054755077,0.000014353975,0.000019832716,0.000008119669,0.003768038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829406,0.0006027623,0.0001069637,0.00018229042,0.00033402847,0.0004798908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699877,0.02040546,0.005036437,0.0018398555,0.0014432959,0.0012872379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004665922,0.0002689371,0.0009483859,0.0008823739,0.0008211574,0.003873744,0.0011644596,0.002746432,0.009321772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030162932,0.0005026768,0.00047500595,0.00080608786,0.0037306708,0.0045601293,0.0019616026,0.003698436,0.00036879283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019828387,0.00012560084,0.0038760463,0.000055476678,0.0000373427,0.00041795423,0.00023067277,0.020600317,0.00038723994,0.966213,0.001686844,0.006171234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067007066,0.000049624,0.0033046752,0.00002723775,0.000025450725,0.00011911799,0.0002903003,0.019632885,0.00021042995,0.9751834,0.0010697823,0.000020049642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002993368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023971894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009321772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031359969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001929224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031184435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404310515","doi":"10.1007/s11245-024-10126-8","title":"Intrinsic Responsibility for Rule-Following","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Topoi","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Grantová Agentura České Republiky","keywords":"Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.0359712586712524,"score_gpt":0.25070254064352954,"score_spread":0.21473128197227714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404310515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34878328,0.00048758986,0.19613613,0.008503714,0.00021815489,0.00021267182,0.00047410955,0.0005017375,0.4446826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98810965,0.00006557154,0.0034693715,0.00018677172,0.00007234294,0.000026298007,0.000047795613,0.000033704317,0.007988543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921503,0.002176484,0.00052417757,0.0013374388,0.0021770133,0.0016345307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95195657,0.018158065,0.0067231283,0.012262985,0.0071055433,0.0037937236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00832947,0.0002713129,0.00060125487,0.0011898574,0.0024848636,0.006014601,0.0014646393,0.0022951574,0.016762903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043082383,0.00040728573,0.0006157277,0.0006794572,0.005112897,0.004430123,0.0023842687,0.0036336987,0.0015524855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004885923,0.000114782895,0.013354333,0.000056842524,0.000047582245,0.00018860449,0.0012731345,0.0017689338,0.00074818375,0.9600264,0.0026940447,0.019678308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029611381,0.00003808324,0.010343197,0.00003518384,0.00003604954,0.00023023998,0.0006104998,0.009546304,0.0014419658,0.96994823,0.0077114413,0.000029337993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035015147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037703342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016762903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020434977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046505434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05607754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404346880","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4976638","title":"Correlation Neglect in College Admissions: Experimental Evidence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Neglect; Correlation; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Mathematics","score_opus":0.026916529967496293,"score_gpt":0.2537835626668647,"score_spread":0.2268670326993684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404346880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97552323,0.0007973826,0.003461483,0.0018263578,0.00006765097,0.0001343089,0.00017777806,0.00003585205,0.017975928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963965,0.00035201726,0.00048685653,0.0004336076,0.00010108207,0.000058660084,0.0001249829,0.000015064956,0.002031287],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.98419595,0.010052626,0.0008329021,0.0012183583,0.002808518,0.000891707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5734199,0.3091478,0.065670595,0.035852484,0.006843379,0.009065853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027661119,0.00057721,0.0012204731,0.0010708908,0.0022532651,0.0032351988,0.0012877892,0.002331117,0.023711128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17582752,0.00084653066,0.00050173065,0.0017817366,0.0053229923,0.0024216187,0.0023150954,0.0028140256,0.0016446053],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03479147,0.023062352,0.6793629,0.0012421451,0.0017970139,0.0012912687,0.00609869,0.00929838,0.011091694,0.073458664,0.010274314,0.14823115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00633872,0.011104021,0.7278804,0.00035813003,0.0015381858,0.0013257822,0.0031110237,0.017180085,0.008873847,0.20739822,0.014647885,0.00024354154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004849849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048585725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027661119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013329954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030162267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14628768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404469175","doi":"10.29173/alr2792","title":"Pathways to Ruin? High-Risk Offending Over the Life Course, Erin Gibbs Van, Brunschot &amp; Tamara Humphrey (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2022)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Life course approach; Sociology; Criminology; Gerontology; Psychology; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.026066851395413756,"score_gpt":0.228773064707307,"score_spread":0.20270621331189323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404469175","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0078121377,0.25928155,0.0005645787,0.65317386,0.0042529427,0.00002038392,0.0016682884,0.000042082913,0.07318427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33903933,0.4766302,0.00074596255,0.06960727,0.011131364,0.00009037236,0.0012694068,0.000088784625,0.10139736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992574,0.00020379091,0.000029189292,0.00007457615,0.00015130539,0.00028381584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675316,0.00096924964,0.00030549252,0.00007961645,0.0006313743,0.0012610242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015837824,0.00045352,0.00040863207,0.0012461672,0.003540567,0.005938116,0.0010973832,0.00557156,0.013886118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009449692,0.00048746457,0.00031484535,0.0019015743,0.0041127075,0.0045121224,0.0023029079,0.005134321,0.0016286412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045079698,0.00003877731,0.006168226,0.000103265425,0.000016170987,0.00025911312,0.0016946922,0.00023387141,0.000028405715,0.100506194,0.8376133,0.053292934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041246964,0.000035727942,0.07041466,0.0027759422,0.000048986836,0.0006514266,0.01760754,0.0006498754,0.00007682576,0.16741438,0.74021214,0.00007126564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35799015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6687187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35799015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010076374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014271875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71181285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404469177","doi":"10.29173/alr2795","title":"The Regulatory Offence Revolution in Criminal Justice: The Choice Architecture of Regulatory Offences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Criminal law; Law; Architecture; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.02929645530729407,"score_gpt":0.24903312133973218,"score_spread":0.2197366660324381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404469177","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051782664,0.07881414,0.065359056,0.12740366,0.0011456655,0.00010431303,0.00009112751,0.00009884046,0.6752006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9434168,0.023091555,0.006481151,0.009229838,0.0008785513,0.00010258784,0.00003388871,0.00006241719,0.01670323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916197,0.004644311,0.00020180306,0.0005909083,0.0020655382,0.00087776367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934923,0.004420216,0.00036786232,0.0006132287,0.0008169426,0.00028945057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077484944,0.00028986996,0.00051368616,0.0020840396,0.002977462,0.008539974,0.0011828357,0.0041453876,0.0033351155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011633558,0.00042425768,0.00054419873,0.0018986586,0.040284272,0.008316958,0.0028558576,0.006928243,0.00043622128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026677371,0.000003114187,0.000074864605,0.000011507837,0.0000015040407,0.000010582728,0.00008860641,0.00034793073,0.000016893597,0.99518615,0.00083860423,0.003417727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010595747,0.000012898044,0.00079505413,0.0001122599,0.000004625921,0.00003263969,0.0001860661,0.00075094594,0.00005486561,0.9586317,0.039396744,0.0000115743305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0193674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015112087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0193674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012263388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008169907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088977516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404469194","doi":"10.29173/alr2800","title":"Over a Shadowed Threshold: Supreme Court of British Columbia Litigation Activity 1992-2022","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.02322427748601009,"score_gpt":0.23224544404203668,"score_spread":0.2090211665560266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404469194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9421515,0.0020069357,0.00022729732,0.0043805665,0.000039095783,0.000051969437,0.0073399036,0.00004518892,0.04375761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985095,0.0006408083,0.0001048857,0.00031457774,0.000018021721,0.000014911693,0.0021981054,0.000012486127,0.011601278],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600005,0.00017396192,0.000120833734,0.00036912566,0.002059661,0.0012763359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908125,0.0008859678,0.0010520745,0.00018100433,0.0053925305,0.0016760173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014071045,0.00018321628,0.0004654974,0.0065851784,0.0038788181,0.0062630903,0.0012785053,0.0012862969,0.004872129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008705646,0.00035452723,0.00021236815,0.011513184,0.0015713725,0.0013471749,0.0020551104,0.0017085823,0.00069420127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005829262,0.00018549105,0.77750784,0.00024213253,0.0001654184,0.0017788624,0.013451418,0.00361327,0.0025499635,0.018999297,0.0631978,0.11772555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008480282,0.000019202505,0.98215586,0.00006149656,0.000021648326,0.00007781184,0.0058270935,0.00088055193,0.0001816212,0.00047261434,0.010262822,0.00003075161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98924327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06727185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06727185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045520782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48809373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404518515","doi":"10.1609/aies.v7i1.31729","title":"Automating Transparency Mechanisms in the Judicial System Using LLMs: Opportunities and Challenges","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.24545623715664308,"score_gpt":0.29133563966441534,"score_spread":0.045879402507772254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404518515","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04308611,0.0019494726,0.8744767,0.03708504,0.00048175995,0.0008201377,0.0005650405,0.032436866,0.009098977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49315012,0.00088283804,0.4965598,0.003105282,0.0006331009,0.0005158207,0.00049468107,0.0018976806,0.0027607535],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8813509,0.080155715,0.0076078763,0.006920959,0.018938018,0.0050265165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62822,0.18254985,0.027591355,0.12011909,0.03594694,0.005572752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07326622,0.0010097389,0.001868881,0.0038800582,0.0029331816,0.0134597635,0.0056757256,0.0034033402,0.0045529315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20249304,0.0017059157,0.0012050822,0.0031842631,0.005542913,0.016017359,0.012221739,0.006923626,0.004575395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005845466,0.00079830404,0.019838009,0.001031397,0.00023577288,0.0005423715,0.0061841365,0.04060469,0.018934773,0.11196853,0.044654775,0.75462264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000462956,0.00035896746,0.009667243,0.0013527718,0.00014100171,0.00062592706,0.003601041,0.45279077,0.04036055,0.32902932,0.16110775,0.0005018242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005968804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052124555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07326622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043229964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014362948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38747346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404594603","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5027995","title":"Noisy Factors in Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Computer science; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.021232560899771973,"score_gpt":0.22225932824742337,"score_spread":0.2010267673476514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404594603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35757083,0.023837028,0.18962233,0.1303148,0.0018508753,0.00012728525,0.0019397765,0.00040131688,0.2943357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98212653,0.002767896,0.0026834533,0.0012585617,0.0010108831,0.000029961588,0.000097554526,0.000064627355,0.009960549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972132,0.0013442934,0.00011228916,0.00050201826,0.0006338348,0.00019434607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742302,0.020139312,0.0018752762,0.0019851504,0.0012419805,0.00052815856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004262995,0.00046304057,0.0011076228,0.0015095004,0.0012922937,0.0074296105,0.0005936346,0.0023348394,0.010562861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045852903,0.0005615537,0.00040619884,0.0014963306,0.006359896,0.008115023,0.001889813,0.002893066,0.000685689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036850804,0.000023344674,0.002229509,0.000051667605,0.00003601322,0.00008090544,0.00045904517,0.0038985508,0.00009402306,0.9795594,0.005205095,0.008325555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007408986,0.0000072729977,0.0011562789,0.000034076755,0.0000106900325,0.000025632686,0.00011389779,0.0046109147,0.000037496553,0.9905849,0.0034023824,0.000008964267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003080044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023416101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010562861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025336938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011310945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035336316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404635169","doi":"10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102597","title":"Does non-punitive regulation increase the demand for D&amp;O insurance?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific-Basin Finance Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Algoma University","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Punitive damages; Economics; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023523943423140712,"score_gpt":0.22702049424325008,"score_spread":0.20349655082010937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404635169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9101021,0.0010717912,0.0012873802,0.02973614,0.0003273887,0.000043329495,0.00079921534,0.00008590219,0.056546554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99516606,0.00016737856,0.0001185412,0.001869503,0.00011662763,0.000008014732,0.000074806645,0.000006501388,0.002472579],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851733,0.0005191745,0.000061491286,0.00019943934,0.000274272,0.00042820585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96329224,0.023667606,0.008485905,0.0010116118,0.0014619434,0.002080582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021826841,0.00013918888,0.00034487655,0.00043953044,0.0005228606,0.0020207104,0.0007736654,0.0027935437,0.024920896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018876547,0.0002614173,0.0006924866,0.00036398423,0.00096282794,0.0011433286,0.0007300058,0.0016934042,0.0015302394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006064381,0.006476253,0.7383365,0.0005194293,0.00057855627,0.001604545,0.00096233,0.005010062,0.010863233,0.057877574,0.028498461,0.14320865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007383463,0.0020425299,0.8912055,0.00025724506,0.0005010903,0.00075097877,0.0038766998,0.01391613,0.005980255,0.041640133,0.03900572,0.00008549453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049685966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008197403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024920896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010900883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017480969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08336878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404671983","doi":"10.1162/rest_a_01538","title":"Truth in Sentencing, Incentives and Recidivism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Economics and Statistics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Incentive; Criminology; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03129848265971852,"score_gpt":0.23978070513901986,"score_spread":0.20848222247930134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404671983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96125805,0.003342707,0.0014616553,0.015928764,0.00018960457,0.000046364163,0.0009036975,0.000031726075,0.016837338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99723226,0.0007752846,0.0001589171,0.0003529037,0.00010280079,0.000010339745,0.00012219041,0.000003215499,0.001242019],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973219,0.0011337239,0.0001517143,0.0001836666,0.0006807012,0.000528421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97102755,0.011135964,0.013276201,0.00040826612,0.0026535098,0.0014984983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036972999,0.0001217306,0.00031378,0.0013285683,0.0009839832,0.0017907711,0.0005475153,0.0008156329,0.005573204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022626406,0.00016698634,0.00021314164,0.0010025864,0.0010069659,0.0008275652,0.00070612563,0.001498732,0.0003067536],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063191116,0.0010102835,0.77220935,0.00037355506,0.00034918188,0.00054162194,0.001255408,0.010702354,0.0005526707,0.093083076,0.03226151,0.08702911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008765645,0.00044641717,0.9315104,0.0003951889,0.0002863218,0.0002250587,0.0022797247,0.012204536,0.0007205059,0.03709407,0.014688063,0.000061983934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023675308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034519687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023675308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032009447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024547053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047075033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404736921","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2024.105249","title":"Laffer’s day in court: The revenue effects of criminal justice fees and fines","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Laffer curve; Economics; Revenue; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Tax revenue; Criminal court; Monetary economics; Public economics; Law; Tax reform; Political science; Microeconomics; Gross income; State income tax; International law; Finance","score_opus":0.03462839435981205,"score_gpt":0.23330528921540974,"score_spread":0.1986768948555977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404736921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6564452,0.0034233523,0.0019244488,0.08087121,0.0009735226,0.00007395759,0.0012294344,0.00010537016,0.25495356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985524,0.00046453663,0.00011184447,0.0015095564,0.00043182232,0.000008434903,0.00009001959,0.000025189172,0.011834551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967891,0.0012015781,0.00010212389,0.00030314084,0.000568432,0.0010356777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96833503,0.02299168,0.002377119,0.0009307631,0.0023366935,0.0030286794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004447955,0.00032839106,0.0011644574,0.0012381856,0.0029620316,0.008085305,0.0017190318,0.0057605715,0.026796656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043483038,0.0004198646,0.0011170071,0.0012089509,0.0033424972,0.005874468,0.0021091388,0.009143065,0.0017351848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00227807,0.0021262346,0.061412994,0.00013818516,0.000332524,0.0029421602,0.0022437463,0.02592837,0.0008942592,0.6881729,0.16073361,0.052796934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008010339,0.00067467237,0.18617952,0.0002058507,0.0006948959,0.0008552314,0.009515613,0.058066364,0.0013719762,0.6794908,0.061727624,0.00041648152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049479466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08732724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049479466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005922936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041338876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09838289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404939052","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5040543","title":"Unresolved Conflict in Workers' Compensation: The Impact of Legal Representation on Workers' Compensation Benefits","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Workers' compensation; Compensation (psychology); Representation (politics); Business; Labour economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03348548328301813,"score_gpt":0.26977702625152356,"score_spread":0.2362915429685054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404939052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9096151,0.0038362457,0.00089214265,0.028367124,0.0002313778,0.00005886608,0.000263256,0.000015917589,0.05671991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976125,0.00027936173,0.000052406584,0.0004320827,0.00010397227,0.000008517106,0.000027441482,0.000003046725,0.0014806894],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907267,0.0051575275,0.0002741174,0.00042277022,0.0009656472,0.0024532846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91895366,0.057649728,0.011408119,0.0012851164,0.0028633643,0.007840065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009699284,0.00029478845,0.0008206204,0.0014477844,0.004133719,0.00856007,0.002256579,0.0062130345,0.024111625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08533629,0.00032054022,0.00068711175,0.001927073,0.00398276,0.0044556116,0.005081454,0.0067441883,0.001020112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0084547475,0.009954425,0.39866698,0.00041146728,0.0004752678,0.0037963977,0.012241719,0.01844569,0.0011323799,0.39540517,0.023440879,0.12757492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013677452,0.0021877883,0.50099564,0.00045463679,0.0007737052,0.0012849952,0.03317794,0.026930733,0.001074798,0.41205958,0.019459441,0.00023300978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0100923395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014212682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024111625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003659123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00410941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080661416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405226392","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5046430","title":"Moral Hazard Models Do Explain the Use of Personal Guarantees","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Moral hazard; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Social psychology; Economics; Philosophy; Microeconomics; Incentive","score_opus":0.054327349759208304,"score_gpt":0.22121523086268446,"score_spread":0.16688788110347616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405226392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6619868,0.0026062566,0.16985206,0.04264773,0.0004442866,0.00015638807,0.0017292406,0.00064575725,0.1199315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99049544,0.00040470847,0.001590207,0.00032592512,0.000080912825,0.000014622099,0.00008819903,0.00004672062,0.0069532814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987557,0.00046120983,0.00006503502,0.00020379663,0.00021904384,0.00029526942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752296,0.01644556,0.004239047,0.0024124882,0.00088948425,0.00078386295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004726153,0.00028840703,0.00045737435,0.0009436417,0.0009213586,0.0031613864,0.0014084231,0.0029435223,0.029924639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03192263,0.0003846619,0.0008219386,0.001011498,0.001778582,0.0044943476,0.0009894191,0.0034537613,0.0019806065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016080329,0.0002586624,0.04364214,0.00011583353,0.00012621089,0.0005308414,0.0019260654,0.022582486,0.0004465821,0.8790614,0.014386689,0.036762286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075409225,0.000059542315,0.021434352,0.000059279657,0.000062049345,0.0003581347,0.0006162786,0.054140214,0.00033044102,0.91255283,0.01026173,0.000049799408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049627563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00430551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029924639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013160675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011567952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10010785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405270047","doi":"10.1007/978-94-6265-647-5_9","title":"Artificial Free Thought: Automated Courts and the Independent Algorithm","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"European yearbook of constitutional law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.023073773968551033,"score_gpt":0.20080104079259126,"score_spread":0.17772726682404022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405270047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016646415,0.033914763,0.18895526,0.05235305,0.0011146554,0.000104675186,0.00011393558,0.00022347791,0.70657384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8495139,0.017116409,0.059644688,0.009133673,0.0022917225,0.00032154287,0.00017426733,0.00022666925,0.06157717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931124,0.0036565159,0.00024119018,0.0007292751,0.0017804485,0.00048022647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99090856,0.0072231404,0.00038295425,0.0009106099,0.0004172429,0.00015746905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006947838,0.00030211703,0.00042590816,0.0017441466,0.003430675,0.009428168,0.0014093327,0.003818441,0.0051011033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010039446,0.000351664,0.0006320275,0.0015141576,0.033937264,0.010770008,0.002925324,0.005523505,0.00084673223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.6671963e-7,0.000001109006,0.000009049005,0.0000052066403,5.2727614e-7,0.000006168238,0.00013470468,0.00013691693,0.0000072900425,0.9977398,0.0005085699,0.0014498272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031201193,0.0000030772117,0.000040559797,0.000048220416,0.0000013994045,0.000016028185,0.00008283799,0.00043076728,0.000055081786,0.9613548,0.037959956,0.000004081521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031934285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021134145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009428168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006051616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051103244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04390776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405311010","doi":"10.1111/abac.12357","title":"Lawyer <scp>CEOs</scp> and Strategic Disclosure of Litigation Loss Contingencies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Abacus","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Litigation risk analysis; Accounting; Human settlement; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.029132603209642543,"score_gpt":0.2146034355570405,"score_spread":0.18547083234739797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405311010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99500304,0.00008758046,0.0001890609,0.00034979352,0.0000035785768,0.0000119190945,0.000041133135,0.0000040301998,0.0043097804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996063,0.000030197625,0.000060758364,0.00002769893,0.000006883699,0.0000025935994,0.000024262185,5.037444e-7,0.00024081032],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979399,0.0006757207,0.00025505846,0.00018288626,0.00064666866,0.000299728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90026826,0.035531916,0.056432817,0.0019468771,0.0019562615,0.0038639393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032908234,0.00007939618,0.00013364143,0.0008730989,0.0004894226,0.0016267373,0.00026440568,0.00052950723,0.0062191817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04016544,0.00011714789,0.00008054017,0.00045149607,0.0005143223,0.0010033079,0.00079063704,0.00070717384,0.00040507666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010129788,0.000209315,0.97689646,0.000022492217,0.000028333054,0.00028451692,0.0019855334,0.00036589077,0.0006157724,0.0011912796,0.0007615527,0.017537577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000116617,0.00013041175,0.9918859,0.000026633226,0.00001105452,0.00047021292,0.0040432597,0.000751949,0.00033970206,0.0010441425,0.001272665,0.0000124258495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001534004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003345302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062191817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039393464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005013508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02080524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405355376","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2412.09455","title":"Noncommutative Choquet theory: A Survey","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Noncommutative geometry; Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Algebra over a field; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.11205878368801235,"score_gpt":0.19139391169023773,"score_spread":0.07933512800222538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405355376","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03825695,0.514596,0.31989974,0.009153813,0.0021782443,0.00009171179,0.00035530928,0.00017409168,0.115294196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46771505,0.4301726,0.06810046,0.003030997,0.009578222,0.00023376798,0.0006276476,0.00017587886,0.020365292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872583,0.0004649307,0.0000801275,0.00026957726,0.00036864588,0.00009095061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946867,0.0036435425,0.0002595598,0.00040789746,0.0007936495,0.00020867237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033102413,0.0008474543,0.0018751891,0.004393926,0.0013974527,0.0025880225,0.0013497884,0.0015256642,0.005627892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00526658,0.0006511866,0.0010319198,0.0070982734,0.0026052846,0.0047132284,0.0014871025,0.0018202229,0.0010375407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016272625,0.0000671729,0.0006316521,0.00084955734,0.000044114026,0.00006261537,0.00015249987,0.0021402596,0.0004079256,0.93829346,0.0043046162,0.053029772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013510401,0.00007043247,0.0010390822,0.00025132534,0.000024064646,0.00031509792,0.00015847414,0.009183022,0.00028812393,0.9028036,0.085806146,0.000047188594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092459965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007907027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005627892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018347662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001372368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0188272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405588519","doi":"10.7202/1115108ar","title":"Le financement de la justice : la vraie mesure d’accès à la justice","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.017348414311611132,"score_gpt":0.2322499266528884,"score_spread":0.21490151234127727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405588519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5769835,0.0051589417,0.008557107,0.0446317,0.00046794885,0.00006524537,0.00033140226,0.000086010215,0.36371815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852852,0.0009269991,0.00061467197,0.0004997433,0.00007420892,0.000021484624,0.00004146803,0.000013934601,0.012522188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946767,0.0023120767,0.00017163767,0.00032189002,0.0014148257,0.0011028366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937366,0.0017187436,0.0014314753,0.00025639642,0.001188861,0.0016678552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032381231,0.00027761245,0.00028974452,0.002105632,0.0065505565,0.0072727306,0.0010284676,0.0015060469,0.0129998075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016720815,0.00022666182,0.00021441045,0.0018590541,0.007752796,0.004579243,0.0062155547,0.0024315512,0.0008411618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017821991,0.0001320876,0.07450683,0.00019097699,0.000052737352,0.0016861561,0.1294891,0.0012309211,0.000647693,0.63843864,0.015630431,0.13781619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044497152,0.00028103136,0.23799695,0.0018030263,0.000059419086,0.0026693165,0.18578999,0.0017832683,0.0006870877,0.123836294,0.44488424,0.00016482551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057768174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07723549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057768174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008136475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009550542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11486381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405601537","doi":"10.1109/icsme58944.2024.00056","title":"On the Impact of Draft Pull Requests on Accelerating Feedback","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Hull; Aeronautics; Engineering; Marine engineering","score_opus":0.05581668171117359,"score_gpt":0.26188244553445983,"score_spread":0.20606576382328623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405601537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86741185,0.0026082753,0.09809056,0.0048496355,0.00046012914,0.00094790844,0.0011910038,0.009624714,0.014815816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826224,0.0002120647,0.014036412,0.00034151023,0.00007510016,0.00015064754,0.0008300547,0.00026141954,0.0014703891],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.920228,0.050840642,0.0044094063,0.0064049195,0.015119963,0.0029971267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24720976,0.6506585,0.034525916,0.024082733,0.03897312,0.004550049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08461685,0.002124506,0.0011847493,0.004077445,0.0017714007,0.006278524,0.0016067198,0.0030916827,0.004004804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4598414,0.0009918673,0.001484217,0.0021164455,0.0027642236,0.009491454,0.0035873367,0.005359853,0.00326835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0069904313,0.002974664,0.42827305,0.0022300621,0.000724526,0.00073761033,0.0076213623,0.10323137,0.012075399,0.00761689,0.015002957,0.41252175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034354904,0.0052508498,0.19773312,0.00084045884,0.0006206956,0.00085177907,0.0035082048,0.7504508,0.01583085,0.012546924,0.011599295,0.0004234896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012990901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065240106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08461685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003653707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045201913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44750202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405611513","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4994541","title":"Collaboration at the Intersection of Administrative Law and Political Science &lt;br&gt;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Administrative law; Intersection (aeronautics); Politics; Political science; Political law; Public administration; Law; Chemistry; Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Municipal law; Engineering; Transport engineering","score_opus":0.023575465005166475,"score_gpt":0.2648636122320841,"score_spread":0.24128814722691763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405611513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022708673,0.015827354,0.057655193,0.29696983,0.0039814273,0.00009999245,0.0016817308,0.0007354597,0.60034037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67055994,0.011615425,0.034773212,0.016426327,0.004607069,0.00040709248,0.0023480963,0.00090969633,0.2583531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775398,0.014710779,0.00076996355,0.0019068033,0.003080609,0.0019921232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9173792,0.052174464,0.0035214354,0.008584404,0.0075094625,0.010831161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02791034,0.00052884495,0.0014047909,0.0044909124,0.005669392,0.019849315,0.0019607916,0.008352527,0.084431544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044850275,0.00045125495,0.00068989815,0.0085668275,0.004185494,0.01438861,0.0090810545,0.0051917024,0.017898217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071058836,0.00007602148,0.0013583206,0.00015770881,0.000032859607,0.00009930799,0.0018226198,0.0006003998,0.0002743624,0.7945011,0.1417952,0.05921094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050204875,0.000022139804,0.0014723997,0.00025692358,0.000013795009,0.00008042012,0.0014945623,0.001992414,0.00035717114,0.59218353,0.40204966,0.00002679555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005606909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004971238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084431544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049422444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020804025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28245163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405638021","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4995690","title":"Lawyer CEOs and Strategic Disclosure of Litigation Loss Contingencies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Accounting; Public relations; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.018180885330341394,"score_gpt":0.21075297972420598,"score_spread":0.19257209439386458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405638021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97937405,0.0005133926,0.0008693424,0.0036617266,0.000043089796,0.000024067333,0.00012892351,0.000021500246,0.015364002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994091,0.000061685576,0.00006497611,0.00007565894,0.000029337907,0.0000027211943,0.000024494979,0.0000010677265,0.00033099458],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716276,0.0012565929,0.0003480904,0.00023025721,0.0005405188,0.00046184374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.821242,0.09708024,0.06968413,0.0032801072,0.0038777257,0.0048359004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065753255,0.00014487204,0.00029870565,0.0012847754,0.00076745404,0.0036013778,0.00038673932,0.0017475836,0.0061469735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10552622,0.0002557298,0.0001367973,0.0008753342,0.0006496555,0.0021821235,0.0014620863,0.0017368832,0.0004650885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013442626,0.0011555994,0.9036788,0.00009810442,0.00018897917,0.0010449373,0.003957114,0.0052686534,0.0012584567,0.019288646,0.00503733,0.057679098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016881464,0.0010706516,0.92481995,0.00012537655,0.00017360624,0.0015335674,0.009857291,0.01589215,0.0011534704,0.03942912,0.005678127,0.00009779322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001007011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002699114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065753255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007883714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001087111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034774065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406058764","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2407.13070","title":"The Cost of Arbitrariness for Individuals: Examining the Legal and Technical Challenges of Model Multiplicity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitrariness; Multiplicity (mathematics); Computer science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.15691089517359202,"score_gpt":0.21062449619039403,"score_spread":0.053713601016802004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406058764","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22774385,0.0016411983,0.71691996,0.03475234,0.00020265351,0.00017045277,0.00016645946,0.0002083712,0.018194664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9411219,0.00036840272,0.055962723,0.001114784,0.00021921941,0.00015502052,0.00006330576,0.00007185923,0.00092275423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95172286,0.036032975,0.0016995652,0.0041391896,0.004659448,0.0017460426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5197573,0.42330068,0.020335771,0.027374644,0.0056008273,0.0036308004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07613596,0.00062830985,0.0020080684,0.001835687,0.0028797511,0.007270493,0.0042730803,0.0041500907,0.004359068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31404388,0.00073901424,0.0016511126,0.0016549983,0.011394799,0.011377912,0.010479949,0.008031177,0.00033203748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013810971,0.000101995895,0.016079104,0.0001280493,0.00026048743,0.00058748067,0.0013046749,0.14420849,0.0003645921,0.8088572,0.0015388229,0.026430944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046603498,0.000058407913,0.0015332324,0.0001017784,0.000056929504,0.0001739244,0.00035462427,0.29342625,0.00037018815,0.70177865,0.0020537726,0.00004564474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00514186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005056399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07613596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034407028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047112782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4026503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406146096","doi":"10.58840/v4qacf68","title":"Legal Foundations in Business: Key Factors Influencing Modern Practices","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OTS Canadian Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commercial law; Law; Competition (biology); Business; Legal research; Affect (linguistics); Empirical legal studies; Legal profession; Key (lock); Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.038062508517478555,"score_gpt":0.23926788136131077,"score_spread":0.20120537284383222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406146096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90388024,0.0007103918,0.0010594305,0.009929515,0.000018693505,0.00009427592,0.00008214975,0.000027238088,0.08419812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980021,0.00021958315,0.00020727335,0.0001348599,0.0000056834474,0.000005399939,0.000014036196,0.0000037494144,0.0014073525],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98978114,0.0018687003,0.00030590847,0.000657268,0.0049384455,0.0024485437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9636768,0.009876178,0.0075512854,0.0014044987,0.008100512,0.009390774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005259969,0.00014669458,0.00027657714,0.0033570796,0.013521003,0.010285577,0.0014624316,0.0010863878,0.0048106154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028910063,0.00026982007,0.00018378632,0.0046165986,0.018423619,0.0021612213,0.004209285,0.0026180272,0.00020941216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006674189,0.00038730397,0.63984114,0.00014584458,0.000052480667,0.0009381937,0.14167826,0.0010719291,0.0016352437,0.13218085,0.0043281093,0.07767389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009891901,0.000044684857,0.82544434,0.00022759271,0.000018602443,0.00015421149,0.115901835,0.0008346293,0.0002742207,0.008691043,0.048349887,0.000049070117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85890263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9158062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85890263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0636041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08872929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46148223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406270321","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5092232","title":"Stationarity of the Optimal Enforcement Contract in the Complete Information Case","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Private information retrieval; Principal (computer security); Business; Microeconomics; Feature (linguistics); Value (mathematics); Computer science; Computer security; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023385801465543248,"score_gpt":0.23288451850786857,"score_spread":0.2094987170423253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406270321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51716393,0.0012291265,0.36170405,0.017864738,0.00020537945,0.0003288902,0.0016825012,0.00032938033,0.099491954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9718069,0.0007588925,0.011889747,0.0005649585,0.00030538437,0.00018535205,0.00039075874,0.00010628779,0.013991682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99119085,0.0033597986,0.00052667677,0.0017896057,0.0014051285,0.0017279304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8889735,0.08835339,0.012182495,0.0046123774,0.003291825,0.002586363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017442297,0.0007977198,0.0047677746,0.0028507023,0.0023292657,0.006271029,0.0032681017,0.006297679,0.014527243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07595293,0.0021454175,0.0020721545,0.0025494546,0.005653166,0.009324754,0.0025026954,0.0068982895,0.0012096282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001524917,0.0001261089,0.0011928711,0.000076734555,0.000077769655,0.00025247107,0.0002678529,0.03679662,0.00029062823,0.9540505,0.002583411,0.0041325237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009054706,0.00004844412,0.0011130009,0.000034645596,0.000028674283,0.00008481815,0.00010454384,0.10274241,0.00016473347,0.8950711,0.0004857491,0.000031259147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006932549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038911004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017442297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040477007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061086025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092244804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406554153","doi":"10.1016/s1558-0164(12)70061-5","title":"10.1016/s1558-0164(12)70061-5","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Medicine; Tort; Law and economics; Criminology; Law; Epistemology; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Philosophy; Liability","score_opus":0.013908273832544903,"score_gpt":0.15976081919770393,"score_spread":0.14585254536515904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406554153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002896188,0.00028607214,0.0005895769,0.00035780852,0.00020921243,0.00007101537,0.0007911676,0.0007909462,0.9966145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00051737553,0.0001284906,0.0002565371,0.00016356689,0.000048224563,0.000036111473,0.0003405966,0.0001281372,0.998381],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992611,0.00006106729,0.000058769067,0.00027189136,0.00020410072,0.00014320413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827254,0.0004529279,0.00013102061,0.00024620848,0.00035996508,0.0005372746],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010949846,0.0024350027,0.0016568736,0.0030505904,0.002424898,0.0048962943,0.0029674738,0.0063226544,0.9908715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018224111,0.0009929223,0.0012728949,0.002774201,0.0020434328,0.006050813,0.003603394,0.002573868,0.9932828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024409848,0.00019454697,0.0008159882,0.000496471,0.000028947094,0.00021654904,0.00010406857,0.00038947814,0.0015134538,0.009408269,0.4133552,0.57323295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003623954,0.00006356344,0.00048682062,0.00025842866,0.000009854493,0.00019196016,0.00009063527,0.00017116968,0.0002449513,0.0008559447,0.99757224,0.000018152658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037929867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038442488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009128511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013724008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013384395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013020694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406577862","doi":"10.1016/s1544-8800(08)70483-4","title":"10.1016/s1544-8800(08)70483-4","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.013383995590203618,"score_gpt":0.16205950907694824,"score_spread":0.14867551348674463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406577862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036972843,0.00034975985,0.0006048111,0.0004010185,0.00020394698,0.00009257678,0.0010116344,0.0009574518,0.996009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00057051633,0.00014830563,0.0003007877,0.0001877226,0.000046650726,0.000046083846,0.00040569453,0.00014996984,0.99814427],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933904,0.000055712255,0.00005450079,0.00024137698,0.00017848166,0.0001309822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801105,0.0005754444,0.00015175327,0.00027847965,0.00040979637,0.00057352526],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010349187,0.00261593,0.0016825581,0.0029093053,0.002177731,0.004408286,0.0030290703,0.006137551,0.99100316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018931075,0.0009963822,0.001254846,0.0029792858,0.0019411811,0.005993746,0.0032737884,0.002746692,0.99342114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002540193,0.00020633404,0.00086984807,0.0005061933,0.000030360046,0.00021288247,0.00009664002,0.00042597,0.0015087907,0.007186298,0.40675312,0.58194953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048686805,0.00008192259,0.0006690243,0.00029903886,0.000012793796,0.00023855512,0.00011244628,0.00023705266,0.00032117576,0.00076756993,0.9971886,0.000023103074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045492025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003929576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008996844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013871592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013792397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01283282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406623865","doi":"10.1017/jlc.2024.29","title":"The Demand for Insurance: Incorporating the Severity of Losing Office into the Insurance Model of Judicial Independence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Actuarial science; Business; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.022529103434756805,"score_gpt":0.23733394365056035,"score_spread":0.21480484021580354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406623865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.842202,0.00065143686,0.10302745,0.012021181,0.000113156006,0.000095449446,0.0011255948,0.00014601946,0.0406177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957391,0.00013936851,0.0008719143,0.00009154587,0.000068417794,0.000013321809,0.00008007032,0.000011332325,0.0029849727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852496,0.0004845385,0.000064793814,0.00021999382,0.00020044479,0.0005053369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98583335,0.009427098,0.0021133292,0.0006147527,0.00063175894,0.0013796411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003022133,0.00049836416,0.001246645,0.0014852217,0.000925997,0.004188152,0.0024242038,0.0036005413,0.012076485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012154107,0.0008909552,0.0010956284,0.0013262528,0.0027305863,0.0032799293,0.0020801518,0.0032562625,0.00077993184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023562966,0.00069697615,0.034568273,0.00008505025,0.00012296694,0.0006958909,0.00048858323,0.44080645,0.0008921809,0.5092381,0.003821743,0.008348162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006212129,0.00010558605,0.0075162826,0.00003147271,0.000057410183,0.000121920006,0.0004253233,0.7775871,0.00015142947,0.21250628,0.0013779845,0.00005706782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01413494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010810858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01413494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035457634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017340636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04039991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406792403","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2024.106862","title":"Authority and screening in a principal agent model","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.038970555253463365,"score_gpt":0.2541009455169108,"score_spread":0.21513039026344744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406792403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41438916,0.0026616373,0.36101612,0.032980114,0.0005151839,0.00027813722,0.0013782462,0.0007158899,0.18606557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537242,0.00058934937,0.008055808,0.00037700447,0.00024664478,0.00007926838,0.00009067717,0.00004679275,0.03679047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731547,0.0014121231,0.00010195035,0.0003290329,0.00027617154,0.0005651873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.978704,0.015986053,0.0017834574,0.00084995467,0.0011098277,0.0015668058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051469016,0.0010043872,0.003439357,0.0017630325,0.0019607842,0.005071274,0.003119998,0.0067881024,0.019662842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018813351,0.0011021596,0.0011129349,0.0016490419,0.00366964,0.0057726195,0.0019412846,0.0030724092,0.0019287263],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020085271,0.0001719666,0.0013132481,0.000063492655,0.000049614027,0.0004873835,0.00026689048,0.10070682,0.00032348366,0.88885105,0.0037970499,0.003768169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003243092,0.0000738892,0.0005905425,0.000023159933,0.00003931313,0.00014200987,0.00013522869,0.47454077,0.00009420913,0.522495,0.0014929589,0.000048596696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00871318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059127756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019662842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023842675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025231147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06577873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407050160","doi":"","title":"A study of fairness judgments in China, Switzerland and Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Psychology; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.15402799335270537,"score_gpt":0.4260898560291527,"score_spread":0.2720618626764474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407050160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931292,0.00028173384,0.00012032756,0.0003661507,0.000014990215,0.00003548155,0.00014575389,0.000003351593,0.005903008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987472,0.00012966475,0.00010036088,0.00008856885,0.00000608139,0.000016813992,0.00011198693,0.0000023608832,0.0007968297],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945081,0.0015371373,0.00018039993,0.00048520355,0.0018300489,0.0014591694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861748,0.0036766406,0.002134716,0.00059873617,0.0053348485,0.0020802987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006083127,0.00034411394,0.0005010766,0.003938955,0.009549075,0.0022674138,0.00081001094,0.00065719156,0.001944682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019575749,0.00020000928,0.000417501,0.006487314,0.0029635713,0.0009381572,0.0018341839,0.0010471526,0.000104906685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005013444,0.00020998436,0.8577615,0.00008838552,0.00010242403,0.00058923004,0.09218429,0.00072693784,0.0008037813,0.008733235,0.0039621214,0.034336857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028818646,0.00008433627,0.9609818,0.000054443077,0.00002137229,0.000089712,0.030579453,0.0010080885,0.00024464002,0.00047443344,0.006380393,0.000052478972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9718179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97762144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036930878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036930878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03320283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26795352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407237133","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-74630-7_11","title":"Mitigating Discrimination in Insurance with Wasserstein Barycenters","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Communications in computer and information science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.03575423890153752,"score_gpt":0.23933381675284537,"score_spread":0.20357957785130787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407237133","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080830276,0.0019034122,0.8856875,0.0026976822,0.0003260038,0.000059326794,0.00015024266,0.00042893848,0.027916623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94356096,0.0010430465,0.04560165,0.00063907105,0.00032391644,0.000071603936,0.00009017939,0.0001686837,0.008500912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976476,0.0010418314,0.00006648509,0.0002962476,0.0005528649,0.000394913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854456,0.010917165,0.0010787239,0.0011820671,0.0006079256,0.0007683859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043327874,0.0010094243,0.0020298355,0.0010436678,0.0010632384,0.0025815929,0.0023036452,0.0025108485,0.0063332533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027579233,0.00077336904,0.0006525677,0.0010816436,0.0037499513,0.0049375216,0.003798158,0.0038485553,0.0005574926],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011461187,0.000063914675,0.0005518748,0.000060198454,0.000033800105,0.000057987992,0.00007939031,0.10373087,0.0008409108,0.8661985,0.0036338854,0.024634123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026439431,0.00005114846,0.00018483953,0.000029624796,0.000009477263,0.000035138502,0.00002890522,0.30571827,0.00024147105,0.692353,0.0013046447,0.000016964133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018953822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018742131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063332533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017799939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014229605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02291423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407314785","doi":"10.5465/amr.2024.0371","title":"Contracting with Strangers: A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective on Gregory, Beck, Henfridsson, and Yaraghi’s “Cooperation among Strangers”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Transaction cost; Management; Database transaction; Sociology; Marketing; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02787466448561533,"score_gpt":0.25894402398341476,"score_spread":0.23106935949779944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407314785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14088738,0.022021117,0.21443874,0.27934617,0.0010526401,0.00029514745,0.0002969173,0.000068762616,0.3415932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95632124,0.005364429,0.015830334,0.009216724,0.00064709404,0.0001797792,0.000058897174,0.000020712527,0.012360806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943363,0.0038492382,0.00017732772,0.0005614483,0.0006590353,0.0004166071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882703,0.008260969,0.00096163293,0.0010409895,0.0008464315,0.0006195537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007273051,0.0003776606,0.0010552447,0.0012084007,0.003332207,0.005738084,0.0019279767,0.0077555995,0.0055768676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012799035,0.00036887225,0.0009080747,0.0020373312,0.013534026,0.008092692,0.002701658,0.005046853,0.0004425124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066714233,0.000017732584,0.00023770073,0.000018961577,0.0000067316655,0.00005365337,0.0005883604,0.0005185809,0.00002882386,0.9933689,0.0021515829,0.0030022569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012334254,0.000010580254,0.00027395357,0.00006776017,0.0000057503003,0.000070424496,0.00051310356,0.0017733342,0.000040933355,0.9860384,0.011180227,0.000013252223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045854826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050932495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077555995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028347946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028765365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03846401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408077628","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-69674-9_7","title":"Adverse Selection in Insurance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Adverse selection; Selection (genetic algorithm); Business; Actuarial science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.025328367630056785,"score_gpt":0.1979454804791692,"score_spread":0.17261711284911244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408077628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013361911,0.060362518,0.02560807,0.03549467,0.0014940366,0.00006897973,0.00022385547,0.00008664184,0.86329925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51189506,0.025534153,0.00539261,0.0098713925,0.005150382,0.00016529576,0.0001843489,0.00008402521,0.4417227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992449,0.00029907597,0.000016182592,0.000094494775,0.00025890765,0.00008639722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998976,0.00068480894,0.000068545545,0.0000939297,0.00011591007,0.00006079161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015364812,0.0004361568,0.000518469,0.0005418734,0.0011135765,0.0022912105,0.00063915824,0.0024369447,0.010135548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004112694,0.0002306206,0.00024081618,0.0005843844,0.0033152623,0.001804146,0.0007030181,0.002707688,0.0014246235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007288155,0.000013839184,0.00019797898,0.00001644662,0.0000049204295,0.00003068036,0.00010689591,0.0005653173,0.00005223117,0.9546271,0.030977543,0.013399687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003889292,0.000007183625,0.00050409674,0.000033937264,0.000002536194,0.00004120398,0.000039533345,0.00081244786,0.00003719361,0.95180523,0.046709564,0.0000032613018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026003912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002765666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010135548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015301002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013672952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033906817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408126871","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5163968","title":"Cutting Corners: Does Pay Transparency Impair Workplace Safety?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Business; Workplace safety; Computer security; Computer science; Occupational safety and health; Medicine","score_opus":0.009224006244563165,"score_gpt":0.2097535727150662,"score_spread":0.20052956647050305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408126871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87089294,0.0023349528,0.0030007644,0.088534445,0.0008578051,0.00008306021,0.0006560219,0.000086163185,0.033553764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959661,0.00023040523,0.00024051825,0.0023235409,0.0001436959,0.000012125134,0.000046544577,0.000010875712,0.0010261544],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922925,0.0030944026,0.00045091295,0.00072506256,0.0017482159,0.0016888728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8933834,0.06511488,0.02641584,0.004528353,0.0044773933,0.0060801813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008054944,0.00029337758,0.00066609425,0.00090312574,0.0016227963,0.0054966044,0.0012280513,0.0058569172,0.020377042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0808821,0.00046133134,0.0006404491,0.0006451138,0.0029996976,0.0033255243,0.0025605457,0.0057928627,0.0014829554],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00967658,0.005641059,0.54829484,0.00078956806,0.00084876246,0.0017635155,0.011808228,0.0034272443,0.004919051,0.11520203,0.0438869,0.25374234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013266668,0.0030975481,0.61355865,0.0015799417,0.0009794235,0.0011448809,0.020219468,0.0072242212,0.0069330866,0.32285932,0.02083252,0.00024421912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057588243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004720441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020377042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014583353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047076372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068167984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408158538","doi":"10.1093/rfs/hhaf013","title":"Proof-of-Work versus Proof-of-Stake: A Comparative Economic Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Financial Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Work (physics); Mathematical economics; Economics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Calculus (dental); Computer science; Political science; Law; Physics; Thermodynamics; Medicine","score_opus":0.09146208882687504,"score_gpt":0.31965746020044955,"score_spread":0.2281953713735745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408158538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46906093,0.005315232,0.30807123,0.008716813,0.00013986272,0.0007651609,0.00082995393,0.000106090985,0.20699477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99129045,0.00080318295,0.0057926844,0.000114506234,0.000029485647,0.00011110122,0.000053819345,0.000009190517,0.0017954716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99561787,0.002935413,0.00009037157,0.00026540866,0.0006537891,0.0004371407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96964484,0.024986994,0.001901316,0.0014082363,0.0012590612,0.00079959264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087714195,0.00052727055,0.001158286,0.0021641448,0.0014563716,0.004908994,0.001417553,0.0027566587,0.0097937025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028445084,0.00044037556,0.0008732321,0.0018277002,0.005872881,0.010245976,0.002139413,0.0024486668,0.0004730052],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007225934,0.00006191594,0.0009268475,0.000072366296,0.000038022037,0.00006552981,0.0000717245,0.047056902,0.00026454515,0.9464459,0.00084093696,0.004083116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011717752,0.0002638632,0.00219667,0.00014733082,0.000053711563,0.00016043817,0.00044546908,0.23143908,0.00054918876,0.75844055,0.0061233486,0.00006308437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023806773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019471035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0097937025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005608659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020015475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04638827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408226521","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2024-0025","title":"The laws of the unreasonable victim: Care, mitigation, and strategic deferral","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deferral; Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.012034341763393042,"score_gpt":0.18091752038818254,"score_spread":0.1688831786247895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408226521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16684808,0.013424232,0.1534984,0.15551823,0.0008982248,0.00015659395,0.00009305594,0.00007025283,0.5094929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98094994,0.0011457391,0.004463596,0.004789653,0.00024160778,0.00006273493,0.00001006506,0.00001189099,0.008324768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99451184,0.002184892,0.00020057564,0.00064584607,0.0015505302,0.00090622454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99504757,0.0026863487,0.00083027245,0.00059374765,0.0004818423,0.00036029276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005822272,0.00040481074,0.0005381597,0.0007190035,0.0030351502,0.0049069165,0.0015162252,0.007342646,0.0023948115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011413136,0.00034115303,0.0006508935,0.0005217447,0.0316994,0.0062899794,0.0049431752,0.0053144004,0.00022535509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002454359,0.0000031029379,0.00014887136,0.000005482835,0.0000014655033,0.000028768414,0.00035932512,0.00016099334,0.000028179393,0.9979704,0.00026100196,0.0010300116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011108801,0.000023923629,0.000683756,0.00007354365,0.000011347288,0.00013291874,0.0004920281,0.00093973515,0.0001893151,0.98368764,0.01374038,0.00001432414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014829649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01383204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014829649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005722604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007089665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041520536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408464582","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-85709-6_5","title":"Public Order Incidents","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SpringerBriefs in criminology","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Amgen (Canada); University of Regina; London Health Sciences Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Public order; Order (exchange); Computer science; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13531869723521828,"score_gpt":0.24755406529693388,"score_spread":0.1122353680617156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408464582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048611583,0.0009946318,0.00047543924,0.0049341777,0.0012872062,0.00008471737,0.0018078876,0.00023326038,0.9853216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04827321,0.001665006,0.00037698654,0.0029144448,0.0008318851,0.00006982002,0.0018050525,0.0001254162,0.9439382],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981515,0.00027019312,0.000108673856,0.0002238158,0.0007772124,0.00046855613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781823,0.0005568382,0.00025161498,0.00036774777,0.00065737584,0.0003481339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009578386,0.0005193222,0.00034057884,0.0033629173,0.0046921885,0.0062015913,0.000995322,0.0029674317,0.2188908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005967653,0.00045699868,0.00063559634,0.0029298826,0.0009057235,0.0032519705,0.0025122268,0.00372869,0.06566224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000552679,0.0001235849,0.0015229476,0.00011779627,0.000007941726,0.0004091485,0.0013646954,0.000101780206,0.00013397115,0.114446074,0.8119279,0.06978881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007623933,0.000016990969,0.0027179306,0.00013198685,0.0000060909206,0.00023828176,0.0011622936,0.0000975976,0.00019628563,0.0062885126,0.9891282,0.000008295249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00964557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020475525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2188908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026657854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037760374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7322627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408506162","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-50810-3_12","title":"Revisiting the Many Legal Institutions that Support Contractual Commitments in a Globalized World","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06219054685744308,"score_gpt":0.25498335044822307,"score_spread":0.19279280359078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408506162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07394015,0.013435082,0.027433403,0.01910902,0.0002920982,0.000053357267,0.0001533848,0.00015666548,0.8654268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494547,0.008476835,0.012082628,0.0011243102,0.0001742084,0.000049985716,0.00015736677,0.00009234261,0.028387673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928147,0.0002780667,0.000022637394,0.00010400101,0.00018635821,0.00012749324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979206,0.0009793775,0.0003240093,0.0003805583,0.0002764295,0.000119022225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014489865,0.00029028207,0.0002655438,0.0021610053,0.0022206383,0.0072698253,0.0010146361,0.0012266898,0.008500606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003157677,0.0002884194,0.00035514004,0.003503422,0.011144986,0.006294592,0.0025382931,0.002157806,0.00068774004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020490952,0.0000041301023,0.00021365802,0.000014049066,0.0000017526438,0.00003030202,0.00037954768,0.0007195008,0.000029877161,0.99201727,0.001151407,0.0054365024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011948282,0.000010601493,0.0036894374,0.00038917953,0.000022234202,0.00016455632,0.0020801541,0.006848737,0.00026007273,0.8340806,0.15242457,0.000017895218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010615152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015947593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010615152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004616662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035456154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03349638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408510400","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-50810-3_27","title":"Agricultural Contracts and Transaction Costs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Transaction cost; Business; Database transaction; Industrial organization; Natural resource economics; Agricultural economics; Economics; Computer science; Finance; Geography; Database","score_opus":0.018321259938700648,"score_gpt":0.18432877695951522,"score_spread":0.16600751702081457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408510400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025328295,0.01251116,0.06624475,0.010530893,0.00036724366,0.00011643258,0.00039279065,0.00008312924,0.8844254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71218586,0.0154978,0.0130906245,0.0013950877,0.0008515683,0.0003144607,0.00043207928,0.000097148,0.2561354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998811,0.00044001272,0.000057940026,0.00015785955,0.0004075107,0.0001256241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966678,0.0021355029,0.00032963717,0.00035664547,0.0003663697,0.0001440019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001154781,0.00035905497,0.00033964662,0.0008598059,0.0010016867,0.004035871,0.0006887603,0.001578289,0.020609489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043297624,0.00023102597,0.00027827176,0.0016091748,0.0038418649,0.0039026705,0.0010977428,0.0019619975,0.0014712891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000316256,0.0000042757656,0.00007411066,0.000016001288,0.0000013378115,0.000016116193,0.00008179851,0.0008960758,0.000027112523,0.99056494,0.0025117206,0.0058034295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004914677,0.000009799659,0.00030203056,0.00009274597,0.0000033298763,0.00006389699,0.000115574905,0.0031100665,0.0000757372,0.9159294,0.08028622,0.0000063589728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017113091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010197156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020609489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002917819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014212576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06894565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408551632","doi":"10.61838/kman.isslp.3.4.18","title":"The Examination of the Framework for Mineral Lease Contracts in the Structure of the Ministry of Industry, Mine, and Trade of Iran with a Look at Similar Models in the Legal Systems of Canada and France","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Lease; Business; Finance; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.016893448007731324,"score_gpt":0.19469092105496216,"score_spread":0.17779747304723084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408551632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35540572,0.0019506833,0.04904513,0.04721231,0.00021066665,0.0008141532,0.00039820012,0.00009670323,0.54486644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98223555,0.00024838082,0.00910397,0.00065292505,0.000040501443,0.00016217661,0.00005083945,0.000011513118,0.0074941125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876737,0.0057406165,0.00036083092,0.0011288867,0.0029433286,0.0021525968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99238116,0.0031057042,0.0012488166,0.00060454366,0.0015698319,0.001089896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010390741,0.00037024467,0.00036981344,0.0017039753,0.007497228,0.01225299,0.002811054,0.0041463207,0.0066529764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013216466,0.00042797255,0.00081805245,0.001878548,0.013622112,0.006696301,0.0026940666,0.0043443264,0.0005409492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009201269,0.000036731755,0.001057289,0.000014885592,0.0000030952112,0.00022342331,0.0026787617,0.0015267854,0.00007864879,0.9904551,0.000936586,0.0029795612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001778647,0.00019957875,0.0187225,0.0006536226,0.00003620474,0.0009308767,0.03848403,0.030305376,0.00041368214,0.71392787,0.19597808,0.00017033715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14533389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16702168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8546661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035761837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041612435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2889759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408717960","doi":"10.5744/ftr.2024.2004","title":"Association Between Fairness and Judicial Decision-Making","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Florida Tax Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Medical decision making; Psychology; Medicine; Family medicine; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.02383205018252863,"score_gpt":0.25916347884199276,"score_spread":0.23533142865946413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408717960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9393893,0.004845699,0.0063909353,0.0035964341,0.00007188712,0.00007847991,0.00014989279,0.0000136064955,0.045463838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985844,0.0004404958,0.00042454258,0.00008348195,0.00003543377,0.000007628113,0.000029505765,0.0000029520695,0.00039157533],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9644313,0.021591183,0.0016609281,0.0021389564,0.007821919,0.0023556307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81439316,0.13193509,0.03264059,0.0052141533,0.012674793,0.0031421732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027320147,0.0001424396,0.0004465452,0.00213312,0.0013637104,0.00205175,0.000618337,0.0008305989,0.002977056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13019495,0.0001774635,0.00027765826,0.0018871337,0.0028106996,0.0012715062,0.0012020419,0.0015989123,0.00027302813],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037723748,0.00031265392,0.8562806,0.00019098302,0.00036963896,0.00021061514,0.0029012659,0.0032627932,0.0003168614,0.062759615,0.0018381596,0.07117956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052427225,0.00016820767,0.8913896,0.00021963831,0.00010215435,0.00029041903,0.0022333916,0.004593059,0.00044962388,0.09123996,0.009199624,0.000061925195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068837814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011442774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027320147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002303069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026537979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14448446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408891442","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5112616","title":"Welfare Implications of Fairness Regulations in Insurance Cost Modeling: A Multi-Method Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Actuarial science; Welfare; Business; Public economics; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05121212621716257,"score_gpt":0.3007285077675114,"score_spread":0.24951638155034886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408891442","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26140305,0.00091592985,0.73052764,0.0013002789,0.0001246069,0.0006206683,0.00030572907,0.00014668608,0.0046554343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80903727,0.0003623782,0.18465394,0.0003472162,0.00016521964,0.0011643453,0.00018520668,0.00017408749,0.0039103883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.95297766,0.043830864,0.00036968783,0.001236298,0.00090784405,0.0006776302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.54301673,0.43904695,0.0048951753,0.008449768,0.003677179,0.0009141376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07035423,0.0013565788,0.0026768874,0.0022805529,0.0015922413,0.0037271425,0.004361326,0.0033457184,0.009344084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1605236,0.0009869782,0.003947671,0.0015602651,0.0021525035,0.005587991,0.0029374156,0.0045924922,0.00030356293],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037375325,0.0034007719,0.026002884,0.0008674437,0.0029435635,0.00061949756,0.0022362121,0.4127309,0.001310052,0.468781,0.00413439,0.0732357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003322026,0.0003352957,0.001859959,0.00007897843,0.00025551973,0.000068030255,0.00030479798,0.9196089,0.00029296262,0.07608765,0.00071657833,0.000059138634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007071237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050155283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07035423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003239592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023993282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37207317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409070910","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5185987","title":"Institutional Factors: Political Economy, Legal Systems, and Social Norms","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political economy; Political science; Economic system; Business; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.022405003381161925,"score_gpt":0.2306439885130596,"score_spread":0.20823898513189767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409070910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7742479,0.005372133,0.017279103,0.040974982,0.00013176541,0.00006937956,0.0011110913,0.00009980696,0.16071384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698454,0.00059109577,0.00040852698,0.00017935812,0.00009194658,0.000007922101,0.00007141514,0.000008334578,0.0016569076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986512,0.00065274857,0.000059313195,0.00018350966,0.0002386336,0.00021457727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98579574,0.008371495,0.003267674,0.00048195873,0.00085110083,0.0012320841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025388773,0.00024023688,0.00039630535,0.001260682,0.0008348604,0.0053230836,0.00048616386,0.0012594464,0.016583929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012645127,0.00017682975,0.00023731151,0.0021979818,0.0030066103,0.0030122173,0.0009106872,0.0010180688,0.0006924312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020298702,0.00045389964,0.13381208,0.0001565264,0.00018609485,0.0002885602,0.0010829087,0.009020303,0.000444221,0.81169,0.007960784,0.03470164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011192916,0.00009613133,0.16272795,0.00017048973,0.00013089302,0.00015449127,0.0026821366,0.015516892,0.0005133597,0.80105937,0.016791858,0.000044436918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0083816815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008490472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016583929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002049723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023389081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05547875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409236279","doi":"10.1017/s0022109024000784","title":"Poison Pills in the Shadow of the Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pill; Shadow (psychology); Business; Law; Forensic engineering; Medicine; Political science; Engineering; Psychology; Pharmacology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.0275335164531787,"score_gpt":0.2537569529166829,"score_spread":0.22622343646350418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409236279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8720403,0.0031268399,0.0030753843,0.012366774,0.00015022448,0.000053177468,0.0005523929,0.00004903715,0.10858601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99609023,0.00045670546,0.00018783631,0.0008766684,0.00008208176,0.0000039352376,0.00005002602,0.000005054849,0.0022474418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987986,0.0002645194,0.000049001814,0.00015758535,0.0004938678,0.00023630321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847594,0.005149527,0.007360757,0.00066079217,0.0014406673,0.00062894175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015139838,0.0001255763,0.00037147308,0.0009254387,0.0008887969,0.0028298534,0.0003312044,0.0009192721,0.010628376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009170797,0.00015749196,0.00024248102,0.0010218385,0.0025315653,0.0020932227,0.0011151057,0.002208518,0.00055732974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005687408,0.0010091835,0.3738645,0.00046748467,0.00030054344,0.0012927457,0.0034124746,0.006948421,0.0076299794,0.44408193,0.02516081,0.13526326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015511132,0.0009913128,0.6456767,0.0006380109,0.00037382345,0.0004702045,0.006601839,0.00881343,0.006838692,0.17950797,0.14980005,0.00013288028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008757881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010933909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010628376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018438833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013930459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035555422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409722415","doi":"10.7202/1117562ar","title":"Les clauses abusives des contrats de construction","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.01448154743778835,"score_gpt":0.21523141014553607,"score_spread":0.20074986270774772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409722415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.264242,0.0035545477,0.054241233,0.009129539,0.0005691329,0.00046850342,0.0005130167,0.00014800915,0.6671341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8830417,0.001515699,0.01028628,0.0023133736,0.00032846507,0.00029445073,0.0004081881,0.00012431071,0.10168758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98288095,0.004358343,0.0015344915,0.0018371782,0.00735435,0.0020347855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9716893,0.016013931,0.005321676,0.0029229147,0.0035925682,0.00045960798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007880124,0.0004985777,0.00051666953,0.0021712407,0.005278659,0.007548227,0.00166496,0.0037104755,0.014554922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0289385,0.00072708284,0.0005505494,0.002421129,0.009391215,0.005867647,0.0041123386,0.006031258,0.001927207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034508757,0.000033236316,0.0046455055,0.00008713966,0.000012697592,0.00051748205,0.009461876,0.00018498204,0.0008931709,0.96417403,0.0035875987,0.016367923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077240424,0.00011202675,0.026093958,0.001022158,0.00012436626,0.003772063,0.019916609,0.002327336,0.008359063,0.35932952,0.57870334,0.00016237331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012748668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014787686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014554922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039090263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005085798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048691034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409796959","doi":"10.1109/citrex64975.2025.10974935","title":"Can LLMs Identify Event Causality More Accurately through Debate? A Systematic Assessment of LLMs’ Factuality and Reasoning","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Causality (physics); Event (particle physics); Computer science","score_opus":0.06302887704037352,"score_gpt":0.3320769680520762,"score_spread":0.2690480910117027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409796959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5275374,0.0028422473,0.41906258,0.0069610095,0.00038625536,0.0013972151,0.0043945997,0.006303783,0.031114932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8534988,0.0004382684,0.1391082,0.00078215776,0.0001292655,0.00045992047,0.003276124,0.0002891937,0.002018045],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832403,0.0068051545,0.0024410936,0.003160468,0.0036703194,0.0006826803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8905708,0.07602454,0.016971637,0.007574194,0.0071185613,0.001740292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016155344,0.0014062887,0.001085298,0.006332131,0.001286991,0.005869419,0.0019933728,0.0034394178,0.008888641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18069111,0.0005794062,0.0015788309,0.002287231,0.0020255067,0.019543579,0.0062334505,0.0025446366,0.0021343578],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023803287,0.0006453592,0.20509964,0.0026538433,0.0005301383,0.0018755624,0.023009062,0.015687093,0.02108529,0.0952318,0.015642138,0.6161598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041125264,0.0007444523,0.09729907,0.0016694623,0.0008023776,0.002358065,0.012830078,0.31340444,0.031328447,0.453007,0.08553995,0.0006054461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017502585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018186052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016155344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015286156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023338823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08543867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410351329","doi":"10.1016/j.jacceco.2025.101801","title":"Do major corporate customers deter supplier misconduct?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Accounting and Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"Loughborough University; University of Birmingham; National University of Singapore; University of Reading; University of Leeds; King's College London; Queen Mary University of London; National Natural Science Foundation of China; University of Leicester; Pennsylvania State University; Cornell University","keywords":"Misconduct; Business; Accounting; Industrial organization; Law","score_opus":0.02780274463693186,"score_gpt":0.2147248095698101,"score_spread":0.18692206493287825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410351329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9067108,0.0004755461,0.00074023154,0.023283008,0.00013207668,0.0000421205,0.00019889782,0.0000406159,0.06837666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958397,0.00012274247,0.00009846263,0.00145897,0.00008363463,0.000007176406,0.000037066446,0.0000071423156,0.0023450935],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99584454,0.0020004376,0.00014447006,0.000295263,0.0008443843,0.0008708498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88352615,0.06914037,0.022178747,0.0032143171,0.015168114,0.006772414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071400036,0.00019305553,0.00048437816,0.0010638929,0.0016890833,0.0035118156,0.001034348,0.0038126626,0.018161157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08414629,0.00034972723,0.00023350937,0.0011110441,0.001453658,0.0034421957,0.0011796419,0.002751011,0.0030269525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064269593,0.0010694063,0.8267824,0.0001176936,0.00011153,0.00069557934,0.003399707,0.00046073546,0.0004407691,0.014227706,0.05294693,0.099104814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021612422,0.0007401488,0.8768652,0.0002991376,0.00029767625,0.0016164819,0.03321427,0.0063425493,0.0024953203,0.044356726,0.033465225,0.00009115075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041595767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012699376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018161157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011901129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026909092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060755074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410382953","doi":"10.21833/ijaas.2025.03.022","title":"AI-driven contract law processes and the efficient breach doctrine: A systematic review of legal challenges in common law jurisdictions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Breach of contract; Legal doctrine; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Damages","score_opus":0.0317831476408861,"score_gpt":0.30105738707059143,"score_spread":0.26927423942970535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410382953","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003952851,0.9981212,0.00020463127,0.0005176673,0.00007212345,0.000046276826,0.00005553039,0.0000023294526,0.0005849704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0065923976,0.99213046,0.0005459053,0.0004330966,0.0000644161,0.00007961726,0.000075612596,0.0000031748862,0.000075270844],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883946,0.0044660605,0.0030381912,0.0006543395,0.0032140934,0.00023275931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87784,0.105588384,0.008487132,0.0013546491,0.006102427,0.00062734523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013971119,0.00064975704,0.0021947224,0.016196815,0.0008654704,0.0035554357,0.0013780803,0.002468973,0.0033826514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0671433,0.00067493494,0.00231989,0.01743443,0.0019667204,0.003998388,0.0015976994,0.0019135663,0.00037893167],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086115986,0.000048580932,0.0011816695,0.5792521,0.0015716671,0.00022432447,0.0009857897,0.0004544631,0.0002361317,0.008935853,0.0068054236,0.40021792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004437387,0.00012545641,0.004401716,0.80691206,0.0040466557,0.0006656157,0.0013125858,0.00017009643,0.00021151587,0.004034146,0.17803083,0.000044882723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071284682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020024769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016196815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035159944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02296838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07388723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410420477","doi":"10.1017/9781009170901.034","title":"Examining the Foundations of the Law of Judicial Bias","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0747775857842224,"score_gpt":0.19911658277800512,"score_spread":0.12433899699378272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410420477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07989025,0.015398188,0.0732988,0.08906299,0.0008040321,0.00012995834,0.00009780829,0.00006596377,0.74125195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780342,0.002657638,0.0076950276,0.0032780743,0.0006184679,0.00010667691,0.000024853594,0.00003343498,0.00755171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98037267,0.012228978,0.00048264166,0.0016427469,0.0038458563,0.0014270969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9256882,0.062039435,0.003550011,0.0037985456,0.00401467,0.0009091334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021103958,0.00030568274,0.00062579144,0.002871568,0.004385121,0.011132317,0.001827929,0.0045606876,0.0058914484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070200615,0.000550656,0.00046333086,0.0019959519,0.05733517,0.009592812,0.0041515944,0.0066951467,0.00051247986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026140744,0.000004379371,0.00034768906,0.000010848666,0.0000017705213,0.000022187658,0.0006133996,0.00013978648,0.00001944121,0.996252,0.00055826624,0.0020276175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008709722,0.000005322065,0.0009284299,0.000090184745,0.0000036171632,0.000031960662,0.00050110935,0.0007098693,0.000062915526,0.99011666,0.0075333575,0.00000785512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006300405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052416455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021103958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006630973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049697496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11160976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410507215","doi":"10.1007/s10982-025-09526-7","title":"When Do Unequal Results Amount to Wrongful Indirect Discrimination?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Philosophy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Danmarks Grundforskningsfond","keywords":"Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.03290094831665325,"score_gpt":0.23439442039675412,"score_spread":0.20149347208010088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410507215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3443379,0.0063396688,0.06319452,0.08721921,0.0020273353,0.00022739869,0.00069460145,0.0003151442,0.4956442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842427,0.00088982354,0.0043876013,0.0052554063,0.00061048317,0.000088975394,0.00006483483,0.00015530316,0.0043048863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9736713,0.010036887,0.0015757551,0.0041914373,0.006643294,0.003881253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85692024,0.09743098,0.016294466,0.016998116,0.00887227,0.003483869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028428512,0.00062767335,0.0020515907,0.0036693176,0.0037410676,0.012683327,0.0022797794,0.0072387033,0.02722054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22205164,0.0008335944,0.001048778,0.0027848803,0.018082079,0.0209406,0.006688937,0.006809392,0.0035347573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026163924,0.00026738626,0.028573146,0.00023749482,0.00023268345,0.00038482092,0.0020681468,0.00079925056,0.00044253116,0.89065593,0.00742061,0.06865651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003283052,0.00002908587,0.00828867,0.00015399122,0.00006771063,0.00021971052,0.0014264684,0.0007601122,0.00043203103,0.98403,0.004536414,0.000022890255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00132721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019842773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028428512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003038251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002503063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1503461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410579377","doi":"10.1177/2755323x251341611","title":"Estimating the Delay of Criminal Trials: Evidence From Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of law & empirical analysis.","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal trial; Psychology; Criminology","score_opus":0.13412715877940706,"score_gpt":0.33320450362374926,"score_spread":0.1990773448443422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410579377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764605,0.0015981245,0.0011405569,0.0018263134,0.000030830415,0.000053319483,0.01193352,0.00006652667,0.006890332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98979163,0.0009542404,0.0006972961,0.00019985814,0.000012640581,0.000014067363,0.0068385163,0.000021369353,0.001470458],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973175,0.00036823808,0.00016860453,0.0004351938,0.0010848282,0.00062558986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972614,0.007896194,0.003668225,0.0013661035,0.012749701,0.0017057495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036604654,0.00038670524,0.0005491049,0.002629167,0.002427011,0.0018861684,0.0025079788,0.0006655485,0.0020634395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02873682,0.0003942673,0.0006320375,0.0077340743,0.0012693959,0.0007668644,0.0011093366,0.0011869752,0.00031001703],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028894236,0.0001255655,0.9510416,0.00014699648,0.000273277,0.0002050992,0.0015397153,0.0093789175,0.00017173933,0.0030964497,0.011339343,0.022392385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059560723,0.00005092993,0.9684623,0.00010431483,0.00018380968,0.000047556012,0.0025231075,0.018632442,0.00032670546,0.00059304334,0.008946136,0.00007011279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99814093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99801755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040075395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040075395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048155673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29076868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410785162","doi":"10.1093/9780199289011.003.0089","title":"Competition Issues in Settlement of Litigation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Competition (biology); Forensic engineering; Business; Engineering; Finance; Ecology","score_opus":0.042931578282598866,"score_gpt":0.21258815958001778,"score_spread":0.16965658129741892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410785162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073929066,0.00943859,0.029598445,0.011030621,0.0006613006,0.0001069054,0.00004290859,0.00006570943,0.94166267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7120299,0.010474502,0.01628875,0.007220517,0.0028766915,0.00041334066,0.00020633524,0.00019791887,0.25029203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97685254,0.009432945,0.0010355773,0.0019199727,0.008467322,0.0022915807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838839,0.0113183055,0.0009600775,0.001157657,0.0021850169,0.0004950457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0152629195,0.00064845727,0.0010550336,0.0036966284,0.008438239,0.017727146,0.0034208014,0.011154039,0.033284724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026146665,0.00060887914,0.0013573832,0.0035092048,0.01763069,0.012950409,0.008451967,0.008960242,0.003686583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002409206,0.000008092112,0.000026776563,0.000018367107,0.0000015396802,0.000059747872,0.00052499113,0.0002529772,0.000038155653,0.9925579,0.0030869306,0.0034221727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016618937,0.000027215921,0.00019133926,0.00040683735,0.000007417578,0.0002233817,0.00090280746,0.0014813873,0.00023490553,0.8091955,0.18728705,0.000025494071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004229523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036050328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033284724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009067809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063745906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11134851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410785234","doi":"10.1093/9780199289011.003.0031","title":"Fraud and Misrepresentation/Inequitable Conduct","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Computer security; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.10431705775917641,"score_gpt":0.23389065757214764,"score_spread":0.12957359981297123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410785234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05971583,0.027129905,0.0068432987,0.03149768,0.00049518095,0.00006358934,0.00007060218,0.00003871711,0.8741452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8733328,0.014657231,0.001635558,0.0050428696,0.0005460813,0.000047526668,0.000055856304,0.000031012903,0.104651034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959409,0.0010904904,0.0001020992,0.00020382668,0.002022383,0.0006403576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976457,0.0009729234,0.0004253863,0.00023766328,0.0005448583,0.0001734608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025043385,0.00027555722,0.00030225242,0.002061975,0.0027550876,0.0072380593,0.00061667204,0.0017204382,0.005496876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048322845,0.00015884706,0.00028304016,0.002316855,0.0088246,0.0030365314,0.0027780926,0.0027587372,0.000607883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041723847,0.000021285321,0.0013782409,0.000028841338,0.000003824923,0.00015900434,0.0031899966,0.00034650738,0.00006542312,0.9587202,0.008063152,0.028019356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063658076,0.000023577864,0.00878874,0.001048249,0.000017207345,0.0010107702,0.004574796,0.0016527491,0.0005153901,0.53027445,0.4520572,0.000030526604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009950135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0083277095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009950135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057370802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044288826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04162562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410957399","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_245-2","title":"Crime: Incentive","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Incentive; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.055186401436396915,"score_gpt":0.21546733138105167,"score_spread":0.16028092994465476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410957399","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016561022,0.0035893822,0.008258926,0.010981309,0.00047894768,0.00005028674,0.00014740582,0.000050902705,0.9747867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20741339,0.0065990007,0.0046161884,0.0063145384,0.0016500765,0.00027661517,0.00023378292,0.00013203232,0.7727643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989429,0.00031948552,0.000027780037,0.00024337904,0.00033363063,0.00013279378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992887,0.00027183586,0.000058606976,0.00014962733,0.00015736824,0.000073835065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010470753,0.00069727114,0.0006950526,0.0009534827,0.0020347743,0.0054094624,0.001078749,0.003686895,0.04215374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032012246,0.0003499325,0.00029106133,0.0009001966,0.006188106,0.0048274575,0.0017852843,0.0038045484,0.0053979815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020539944,0.000008152694,0.000032918142,0.000008560188,8.8382154e-7,0.0000052011746,0.000046361278,0.00007900343,0.000011787963,0.98089397,0.014019482,0.0048916396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007631306,0.000008900196,0.00026096115,0.000072777504,0.0000027976398,0.00006121822,0.00010243462,0.0004810609,0.00006699721,0.776171,0.22275844,0.0000057781117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004444285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054460843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04215374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037577373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036166422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14101833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410992482","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5278368","title":"Job Sorting and the Labor Market Effects of a Criminal Record","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sorting; Criminal record; Labour economics; Business; Economics; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.007077663439567906,"score_gpt":0.20330561573202166,"score_spread":0.19622795229245377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410992482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914766,0.00025169458,0.00009618603,0.0026521648,0.00004335601,0.000019141733,0.00026130246,0.000008205784,0.0051913075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962747,0.00013908489,0.000023788401,0.00015746773,0.00007163424,0.0000044619314,0.00009391597,0.0000034454483,0.003231535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836427,0.00061758317,0.00008622341,0.00010254039,0.00016186513,0.0006676381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9669489,0.016184961,0.00862315,0.00081631483,0.0009959068,0.006430658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025347953,0.0002131081,0.00056058355,0.001607016,0.0021849545,0.0026446658,0.0008699914,0.0026301723,0.024015993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019860504,0.00033037848,0.00046433008,0.0015152602,0.0017633549,0.0012955656,0.0015478786,0.0023135429,0.0016242045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004612061,0.005023064,0.93292284,0.000095239775,0.00018816625,0.0010260398,0.0014716677,0.0035486608,0.001215857,0.015055511,0.0055019427,0.02933898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023801289,0.001111879,0.9699533,0.00006502655,0.00014343155,0.00018865251,0.006526428,0.0059742094,0.00046581688,0.012562407,0.0027188729,0.00005186727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026661977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04348037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026661977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012084945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016308484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08034152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411051884","doi":"10.5465/amd.2025.0131","title":"Regulatory Shift and Labor Law Spillovers: A Response to Bierman and Maich’s Commentary “The Spillover Effects of Labor Law Enforcement from a Wider Lens”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Discoveries","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Spillover effect; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Labour law; Labour economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.010116613123244406,"score_gpt":0.22036375049367088,"score_spread":0.21024713737042647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411051884","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008311801,0.0058645615,0.0003927329,0.98695683,0.0034768633,0.000003300181,0.00004284726,0.0000059253043,0.0024257374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06160118,0.013847156,0.0011158728,0.8572564,0.06160169,0.0000463444,0.00006082418,0.000058973557,0.0044115316],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99314755,0.0029160078,0.00026943453,0.0017291709,0.0013034081,0.00063445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9138836,0.074513026,0.002675082,0.0017986132,0.005595288,0.0015343154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013963685,0.000668415,0.0012592366,0.0031895149,0.005517481,0.009518407,0.0033818749,0.04006395,0.009778981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054762088,0.00051566487,0.001219004,0.004978368,0.015396213,0.02151033,0.006989967,0.026341101,0.0013333389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009277419,0.00007698031,0.0012535773,0.00028297538,0.000050417126,0.0003724099,0.004649439,0.00045699952,0.00015208502,0.42027384,0.5534098,0.018928647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008712109,0.000025676602,0.0025904335,0.0012267095,0.000046378427,0.00021629756,0.009598938,0.0008754147,0.00026549876,0.43280953,0.55214435,0.00011356361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0135054225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01966311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04006395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006028977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063819615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07384789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411133282","doi":"10.1515/jafio-2024-0042","title":"Incentive Alignment and Effort Provision in Multitask Contracts: A Basic Test of the Theory","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Test (biology); Microeconomics; Economics; Business; Industrial organization","score_opus":0.013571979790221657,"score_gpt":0.1885838595883055,"score_spread":0.17501187979808386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411133282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8468257,0.00035323622,0.114324994,0.004655633,0.000069095586,0.00034694158,0.00024496164,0.00009833499,0.033081107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944429,0.000050115144,0.00495354,0.00011299677,0.0000245963,0.00008006881,0.000027242506,0.000008474329,0.00030010787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.991302,0.005070818,0.00047669897,0.0011578373,0.0011414565,0.0008511432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8243868,0.1273265,0.026825666,0.013321724,0.0041076243,0.004031709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02045356,0.0005619245,0.0014942118,0.0010025635,0.0010744578,0.0038061228,0.001416369,0.0026232232,0.014052279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10651283,0.0006623612,0.0008873393,0.0010339677,0.0060530133,0.0061772885,0.0037778066,0.0029539228,0.000671665],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002058508,0.0019001474,0.06809657,0.00039932417,0.00022845234,0.0002443379,0.0012669237,0.05048557,0.003666602,0.83996946,0.0012418814,0.03044223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007896861,0.0014800545,0.06107629,0.00009440328,0.00009342232,0.00018910508,0.00092507416,0.24543913,0.0017591963,0.6867135,0.0013303935,0.000109697765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012150828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047740247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02045356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024134135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023173774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10817003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411214515","doi":"10.1111/jels.12419","title":"In the Eye of the Beholder: How Lawyers Perceive Legal Ethical Problems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Legal Studies","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Fiduciary; Professional conduct; Harm; Legal ethics; Professional responsibility; Scholarship; Perception; Political science; Legal profession; Affect (linguistics); Politics; Law; Interdependence; Public relations; Social psychology; Psychology; Duty","score_opus":0.07652903511287192,"score_gpt":0.31965008511180304,"score_spread":0.24312104999893114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411214515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9754121,0.0006006774,0.0008930815,0.009435066,0.000035295354,0.000041360665,0.0000146376315,0.000012164338,0.0135556655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964959,0.0003153966,0.00034670343,0.0017622069,0.000011912322,0.000011477578,0.000009587076,0.0000081004055,0.0010388151],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921846,0.0046014376,0.00017174073,0.00045644311,0.0015300416,0.0010557582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819094,0.009499965,0.0033124352,0.000522772,0.0021267054,0.0026286517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008923163,0.00024987757,0.00037254303,0.0018941091,0.00762249,0.0109994635,0.001094375,0.003815797,0.0045761294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032878604,0.00054275215,0.00036837746,0.0007612794,0.012997947,0.00478233,0.0038047454,0.0043380465,0.000480783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008170603,0.00024218786,0.08082339,0.00008074234,0.000030693805,0.0006113214,0.8938174,0.00011716847,0.0020395296,0.0043921154,0.0031705003,0.014593185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028305003,0.00008611607,0.04105479,0.00015382406,0.000024693476,0.00023795124,0.9388607,0.0005214892,0.00022026338,0.004713678,0.014050646,0.000047486345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10302798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16181257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10302798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008882321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006088734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20485657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411239061","doi":"10.23925/2526-6284/2023.v13n13.71885","title":"antagonismo das Convenções de Montreal e de Varsóvia em face do Código de Defesa do Consumidor.","year":2025,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito Internacional e Globalização Econômica","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Physics; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.015041852732271505,"score_gpt":0.26317011748118246,"score_spread":0.24812826474891095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411239061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7990497,0.004170785,0.0035575547,0.005450131,0.00017436176,0.00016992519,0.0005053111,0.000049223316,0.18687306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778457,0.0012023926,0.0010814957,0.0009471509,0.000037890404,0.000046397214,0.00017004898,0.000010263318,0.018658675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971283,0.00060751935,0.000049051516,0.00046624008,0.0010954094,0.00065350113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978491,0.000460007,0.00048637233,0.00011636978,0.0007185273,0.00036969228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021590823,0.0003232469,0.000245282,0.0007547321,0.0027760444,0.0033050396,0.0007379379,0.0011232658,0.0071471725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030353868,0.00020521929,0.00038040368,0.0007720164,0.0025871522,0.0007990695,0.002434837,0.00096666446,0.00033388045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011758204,0.0005066344,0.45125186,0.00167963,0.00044973005,0.0020000217,0.03925091,0.0031048513,0.096102275,0.19803001,0.016620785,0.18982752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000476889,0.0008897665,0.61178726,0.00040395476,0.0001980671,0.00039051397,0.03484543,0.0010698241,0.014822874,0.013503437,0.32188722,0.00015397908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28585774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49203226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28585774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074121784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011728667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56838775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411260047","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5292319","title":"Proving the Matrix: On the Admissibility and Use of Prior Negotiation Evidence as an Aid to Contractual Interpretation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Interpretation (philosophy); Matrix (chemical analysis); Epistemology; Computer science; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Mathematical economics; Psychology; Economics; Philosophy; Programming language; Chemistry","score_opus":0.025398817422607415,"score_gpt":0.26521806299426837,"score_spread":0.23981924557166096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411260047","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05165174,0.004593753,0.7974609,0.05063498,0.0010920666,0.0005128488,0.00023073795,0.000271671,0.09355134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72533786,0.0023234715,0.26409313,0.003498663,0.00092757336,0.00042219518,0.0001937145,0.00015703884,0.003046402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8728969,0.08614661,0.009194519,0.008969964,0.02056359,0.0022284172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.40295172,0.5144327,0.015351848,0.042511955,0.022208642,0.0025431437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15165175,0.001269382,0.0024049354,0.00976843,0.007991906,0.016371014,0.007826449,0.011083669,0.009918267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.47574133,0.0022493599,0.0026081312,0.004022278,0.05426457,0.058309462,0.012317262,0.01617859,0.0012905839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006905769,0.000032058444,0.00059218437,0.00016110232,0.00004039309,0.00023715063,0.0018794327,0.0008729332,0.00026188197,0.97832125,0.00058361783,0.016949007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042100193,0.00004842482,0.00023136895,0.00039734508,0.000036841175,0.00018070039,0.00040997675,0.004699419,0.0008631144,0.9871113,0.005940936,0.000038418995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033353816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026582363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15165175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004562121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009845323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8020207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411542256","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5297864","title":"Fiscal Origin of Selective Enforcement: Evidence from China's Administrative Penalties","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"China; Enforcement; Business; Economics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.041000327166434924,"score_gpt":0.2755116520390946,"score_spread":0.2345113248726597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411542256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889825,0.00024015877,0.00016853055,0.0012426961,0.000012778984,0.000019879759,0.00028763918,0.000009335796,0.009036621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864596,0.00008035984,0.00002767055,0.00009942592,0.000015430074,0.0000040737727,0.00009527618,0.0000019240133,0.0010297318],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809414,0.00024756667,0.00013884492,0.00020240693,0.0005830913,0.0007338454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793759,0.004151926,0.010061335,0.0012649014,0.0034512694,0.0016947346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023413438,0.00017106826,0.0005058629,0.002093665,0.002160329,0.00222054,0.0009210246,0.00095676276,0.006487387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010516891,0.00020684036,0.00029352054,0.002429848,0.0015060252,0.00080253195,0.001388809,0.0011916063,0.00037081217],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004236849,0.00031695634,0.94075966,0.000115470226,0.00015055704,0.00057481485,0.0023334625,0.0011286547,0.0009199335,0.024459919,0.005831031,0.022986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000659458,0.00011924366,0.986955,0.000041295465,0.000115869254,0.00007441078,0.0020687738,0.0017679319,0.0006255242,0.002978517,0.005166125,0.000021318394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11082737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15675409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11082737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002797074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069349958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22036457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411740303","doi":"10.47743/jss-2025-71-1-3","title":"Interpretarea, instrument de atenuare a bias-ului algoritmic în contractele electronice","year":2025,"lang":"ro","type":"article","venue":"ANALELE ȘTIINŢIFICE ALE UNIVERSITĂŢII „ALEXANDRU IOAN CUZA” DIN IAȘI (SERIE NOUĂ) ȘTIINŢE JURIDICE","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.01589665356415824,"score_gpt":0.20470753130481234,"score_spread":0.1888108777406541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411740303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21256322,0.0021808834,0.100163184,0.007437897,0.00024648895,0.000286187,0.00083863124,0.00028175168,0.67600167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8920044,0.0012261486,0.0289788,0.00054770586,0.000090479305,0.0001395028,0.0003549674,0.00023077217,0.07642731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99587494,0.0015256368,0.0002587116,0.0005719059,0.0013746027,0.00039424136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99284065,0.0034165757,0.0007262771,0.0010873901,0.0017081453,0.00022103176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004499416,0.0005120643,0.00032797773,0.0026516633,0.0026013462,0.0139486855,0.0010463623,0.0012116958,0.03001241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016852552,0.00031381744,0.00053902477,0.0035225379,0.00832005,0.00970921,0.003345744,0.0017406788,0.0021654828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008247135,0.000038394057,0.014370598,0.00029675348,0.000023095177,0.00030130593,0.04269331,0.00089830713,0.0010600742,0.8670797,0.003537841,0.06961827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044019765,0.0000918165,0.047769796,0.001228838,0.00010166117,0.00070713094,0.1280971,0.009652985,0.005547998,0.39360845,0.41301203,0.00013825009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03106925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036722004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03106925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007688357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006683262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10040146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411931957","doi":"10.61243/calamo.23.457","title":"Law and Economics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Cálamo","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Law and economics; Neoclassical economics; Positive economics; Political science; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.018943467675795817,"score_gpt":0.21068916414659372,"score_spread":0.1917456964707979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411931957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059556714,0.097309954,0.02485786,0.14578107,0.001678084,0.000073138166,0.00036743455,0.00014239778,0.72383434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6720215,0.09107551,0.021213029,0.055433244,0.008570377,0.00032501665,0.0003865859,0.00022438109,0.15075034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964851,0.0015829672,0.0001574442,0.0006121793,0.00084721536,0.00031511867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612254,0.0023742423,0.0003110056,0.00052311877,0.0004258319,0.00024331064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004121337,0.00060125714,0.0009193417,0.0020095892,0.0030746942,0.009027418,0.0008572858,0.0048546963,0.016263135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008152732,0.00031014832,0.00051578286,0.0019263496,0.019747112,0.0069140065,0.0032840148,0.0052489084,0.0032241896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002423056,0.0000059343965,0.00014267674,0.000033471755,0.0000046288583,0.0000143180605,0.00011859391,0.00017764555,0.000024231058,0.9892748,0.005169261,0.0050320523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049803275,0.000010803774,0.00030539252,0.0001648684,0.0000032558412,0.00004274911,0.00018464561,0.00023164939,0.000033550994,0.8561668,0.14284463,0.0000067550345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007185483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046163746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016263135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069323913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005984121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05440557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412253722","doi":"","title":"Proportional Liability: Analytical and Comparative Perspectives:Causal Uncertainty and Proportional Liability","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Econometrics; Actuarial science; Economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.0891090450837913,"score_gpt":0.2651225601008824,"score_spread":0.17601351501709112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412253722","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01463294,0.14999335,0.433537,0.06658925,0.0017372805,0.000114305665,0.00036757975,0.00012526981,0.33290306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80959755,0.07852482,0.06771348,0.0059726266,0.00711806,0.0003322605,0.00030124345,0.0001928197,0.030247202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99119663,0.0049036345,0.00040311605,0.0009019727,0.0021214855,0.00047322817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96454144,0.031253308,0.0012305691,0.0013632405,0.0013545223,0.00025701016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012034511,0.0014270296,0.0016798194,0.004487524,0.0019021455,0.009251193,0.0031559393,0.0069280793,0.009952009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036604214,0.0010578759,0.0011964599,0.0049690376,0.023559738,0.01776807,0.0032185533,0.007038253,0.00074722327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023434827,0.0000048969428,0.000033391396,0.000024526125,0.0000038193443,0.000012432104,0.00007706048,0.0003394445,0.000009395482,0.9964669,0.0008936952,0.0021321594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020949412,0.000002491064,0.00004792897,0.00003952966,0.000004792337,0.0000429216,0.00004855943,0.000689371,0.000027774684,0.995411,0.0036794671,0.000004017221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025957266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001848821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012034511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004875184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030282422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0636453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413090044","doi":"10.1017/9781009636124.017","title":"Regulating Markets and Government Grain Purchases","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Government (linguistics); Commerce","score_opus":0.021143518443096643,"score_gpt":0.17206767018708602,"score_spread":0.15092415174398938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413090044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019914176,0.011620647,0.0043249237,0.021604026,0.00026554937,0.000032496137,0.00020013715,0.000066865796,0.94197124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73709047,0.00619842,0.0015713021,0.004009029,0.00038148699,0.000085273685,0.00010580003,0.000054471053,0.25050366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916625,0.0002369628,0.000024661522,0.000104865794,0.00027445157,0.00019289281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991454,0.00054174487,0.00008381276,0.00008155454,0.000106573294,0.000040850737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011966708,0.000226413,0.00028408616,0.0006394452,0.0013070648,0.0055998126,0.00056131795,0.00366585,0.013444285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029725726,0.00028866477,0.00019975578,0.0008941499,0.004300713,0.002303733,0.0008823327,0.002408299,0.0012094888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110997225,0.00001362181,0.00013965982,0.000012206494,0.0000022678003,0.000023340524,0.00017876994,0.00038572954,0.00012976625,0.98214644,0.010271664,0.006685486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000170163,0.000009326616,0.0014724646,0.000089905385,0.0000059264366,0.000027383476,0.0004391743,0.0010707383,0.00033802603,0.8704295,0.12608767,0.000012797612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013861915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02229336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013861915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004023651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003217576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04497558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413191665","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5369511","title":"The Role of Lawyers in Ensuring Canadian Corporate Law Attracts Investment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Investment (military); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.022317977970537632,"score_gpt":0.2007613036613863,"score_spread":0.17844332569084867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413191665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27560273,0.006497899,0.008428821,0.28501683,0.00060877966,0.0006024505,0.0009565764,0.0002463636,0.42203963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662298,0.0011691657,0.0010672796,0.0077542244,0.00020367796,0.000043897562,0.00007777731,0.000023252003,0.023431042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841286,0.0030465063,0.00028139137,0.0010527531,0.0045362026,0.0069544353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9330933,0.026669575,0.006888266,0.001130667,0.018406508,0.013811696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01402733,0.00034515827,0.0006386078,0.0036328284,0.010034685,0.013617396,0.0017363095,0.0068850815,0.016164964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.093653955,0.00043791847,0.00033216033,0.0031478594,0.0066228895,0.0033090145,0.00209581,0.0041915043,0.0008470293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020492235,0.0002054227,0.096918285,0.00035513105,0.00012532088,0.00057065557,0.0061059757,0.004181261,0.0010322024,0.6931731,0.12468097,0.07244671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003485015,0.0002514114,0.2952834,0.0008501797,0.00042046525,0.00033371936,0.024897182,0.015218875,0.002187837,0.2770887,0.38280666,0.00031299083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93521625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9614931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08574051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08574051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19293953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6220938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413243935","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v14i2.467","title":"How Class Actions have Shaped Litigation Financing Law in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Business; Class action; Economic Justice; Law; Jurisprudence; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.05444920155557106,"score_gpt":0.2250137708868608,"score_spread":0.17056456933128974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413243935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5306589,0.019391853,0.0039695376,0.14655215,0.0006035907,0.00034857172,0.0020306006,0.00013936096,0.29630533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97289115,0.00305404,0.0007004915,0.0051294873,0.0001019579,0.00003814833,0.00016129045,0.000035810666,0.017887546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853565,0.0014308603,0.00034580866,0.0011546132,0.006015383,0.005696807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.956647,0.01345925,0.0034015696,0.0009262431,0.018783847,0.006782057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011627864,0.00025812845,0.000557321,0.0062064924,0.016249325,0.01773487,0.0030898934,0.0036343532,0.008874534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037292957,0.00056234933,0.0006060907,0.007570206,0.010481052,0.0021198804,0.0037928591,0.0050678737,0.00027439135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010888536,0.00008203295,0.06955209,0.00025685088,0.00008803236,0.00072548335,0.018877637,0.0025613771,0.0007242998,0.7935682,0.05052627,0.06292883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119454926,0.00008722597,0.36040488,0.0013106769,0.00026923048,0.00021935489,0.0290826,0.006773972,0.0013637296,0.054545023,0.5454191,0.00040482727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99519014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32661405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.32661405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33315223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78103226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244038","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i1.201","title":"Understanding Class Actions Through A Historical Overview and Empirical Data from Quebec from the Past Twenty-Five Years","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Class (philosophy); Empirical research; New class; Social class; Class formation; Compensation (psychology); Sociology; History; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; State (computer science); Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.36795400047362653,"score_gpt":0.3169531767538016,"score_spread":0.05100082371982495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6273063,0.1306954,0.0046955515,0.019460274,0.00043336704,0.00027478018,0.060546555,0.0001997137,0.15638813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9246507,0.03794733,0.001804914,0.0013617632,0.00013766836,0.00007378603,0.010758113,0.0000751221,0.023190578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755365,0.00027284614,0.00012805738,0.00035223304,0.0012614593,0.0004316981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833524,0.002599475,0.0020026597,0.0003511797,0.010682045,0.0010122915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003179425,0.00034760885,0.0003864843,0.009606122,0.0035158177,0.0031594604,0.0013760967,0.0006505691,0.007409232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076074023,0.00024552067,0.00033640763,0.018322384,0.0016349272,0.0013306931,0.0008796837,0.0010824739,0.0005327249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016253989,0.00013813577,0.554051,0.0013526705,0.00026218663,0.0009427613,0.021354517,0.002340995,0.0006170692,0.024508351,0.10982794,0.28444192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042358392,0.00002636754,0.7919439,0.00064050773,0.00005465211,0.0001079041,0.0051076203,0.00082685467,0.00023225608,0.00032870393,0.20067757,0.00004951558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06940284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06940284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049514405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50355524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244052","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v14i2.279","title":"Assessing Fees when Class Actions Follow Government Action","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class action; Plaintiff; Government (linguistics); Enforcement; Supreme court; Class (philosophy); Economic Justice; Action (physics); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.10780324859313761,"score_gpt":0.27811053435354,"score_spread":0.17030728576040238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69905245,0.0071669295,0.011021525,0.010222614,0.00042934925,0.0004937575,0.0020918278,0.000102733946,0.26941875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99122167,0.0007863336,0.001076438,0.00037812823,0.000045453977,0.000018015333,0.00026745885,0.000008996948,0.006197534],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798181,0.002594534,0.0011289907,0.0011079427,0.012845473,0.002504926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95506597,0.011019217,0.011387478,0.0011322942,0.019154025,0.0022410403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008537002,0.00028239327,0.00044813976,0.0053286077,0.0031641677,0.0051060445,0.0017159897,0.0019087137,0.004892467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05680276,0.00022666615,0.00060199574,0.0032704493,0.0030475655,0.002424613,0.001774013,0.002338718,0.00059489824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037301012,0.00031742148,0.60022736,0.00041108707,0.0003452393,0.00079100183,0.0040982994,0.014416229,0.0008681451,0.18597455,0.031856794,0.16032083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059580198,0.00021993091,0.8630989,0.00077808043,0.0004763033,0.00038179595,0.004255318,0.015306074,0.0024645794,0.043954883,0.06883703,0.00016749837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6789091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80077374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32109088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025801541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029489007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64596367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413244126","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v15i2.115","title":"If It Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It; If You’re not Sure, Measure Again: Strengthening the Imperfect Mechanics of Class Authorization","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Authorization; Intuition; Legislature; Incentive; Law and economics; Class (philosophy); Imperfect; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Law; Business; Computer security; Psychology; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07128160262642219,"score_gpt":0.2463536472131486,"score_spread":0.1750720445867264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413244126","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066630185,0.0091247205,0.027416598,0.29169145,0.0019843758,0.00026526078,0.00082272093,0.00031991553,0.60174483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9086733,0.0031777134,0.004383789,0.020942878,0.0005932621,0.00007021735,0.00010414383,0.00007709941,0.06197764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903998,0.0030207413,0.0002559447,0.0010002119,0.003264646,0.0020587125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9700844,0.01232653,0.0021051,0.0024155932,0.011435991,0.001632426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0122616505,0.00036026412,0.0006394376,0.0014451604,0.008853265,0.011368117,0.0022032545,0.0046643303,0.019621642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038098004,0.00040696163,0.0005538316,0.0011700746,0.013833179,0.0053010876,0.0021415786,0.0055622156,0.001569023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049380687,0.000031982214,0.0041409913,0.000103915896,0.00003302429,0.00012216013,0.00094674225,0.0020306625,0.00028176457,0.88982886,0.0803299,0.02210054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015057462,0.0001340552,0.03450374,0.0011115776,0.00022240056,0.00018581269,0.0036032912,0.016680153,0.0025155481,0.43902117,0.5015291,0.00034251623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8244542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8742162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8244542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051291883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05237558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37215042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413363261","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10041","title":"Courts as Multivocal Group Agents","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Psychology; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.025813805437759185,"score_gpt":0.24353648295947286,"score_spread":0.21772267752171368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413363261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2768445,0.0016845748,0.20823537,0.036455747,0.00047338763,0.00041936562,0.00019284443,0.00021543255,0.47547874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695072,0.00019868308,0.013826072,0.0010494944,0.00016638503,0.000109655215,0.000026266553,0.00002454135,0.015091555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98889005,0.005896268,0.00043958455,0.0015193679,0.0021932966,0.0010614583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98572403,0.0068197036,0.0015448517,0.0020885183,0.00220662,0.0016161606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008874413,0.00030118955,0.0005831812,0.0018399591,0.0046143048,0.0099748215,0.0017102154,0.005267879,0.011141733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014787929,0.0004311545,0.0005605996,0.0010598616,0.011270664,0.0070771016,0.006393186,0.0039187064,0.0008952356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007524148,0.000010958747,0.00035372452,0.000008111774,0.0000071697937,0.00008553239,0.00066619774,0.00088908063,0.00010885226,0.995204,0.000543302,0.0021156652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025675516,0.000017587483,0.00018971022,0.000032574695,0.000012334941,0.00006162966,0.00052458205,0.007148512,0.00015323414,0.97320426,0.018616078,0.0000138041005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044371258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003199249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011141733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052914466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003239298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046932936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413670765","doi":"10.64628/aam.yfs6mdfu7","title":"What comes next for Clyde River after Supreme Court victory?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Victory; Supreme court; Law; Political science; History; Politics","score_opus":0.06090069831878414,"score_gpt":0.24921898103288953,"score_spread":0.1883182827141054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413670765","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.078023024,0.007888369,0.0041252845,0.5512558,0.005722741,0.000048685877,0.00062181405,0.00019407384,0.35212016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8288312,0.0020050788,0.00096337404,0.06440301,0.0024451031,0.000046920508,0.00020700284,0.0003440944,0.10075433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934703,0.0016344241,0.00015296687,0.0013559244,0.001054789,0.0023315465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934847,0.0023471592,0.00062002393,0.00048730118,0.0013404752,0.0017204625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00650373,0.00023586063,0.00091970176,0.0011273222,0.0088961935,0.013850381,0.0018257918,0.010544901,0.043584436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034733117,0.00030484018,0.00057252066,0.0010201674,0.005993164,0.011787909,0.0031477218,0.0082114795,0.004763034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013378345,0.000085938074,0.00410244,0.00007842037,0.000049037448,0.000434271,0.001864846,0.00035629838,0.00023132359,0.74213946,0.224462,0.02606219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047756082,0.00007045612,0.0096911,0.00037194623,0.000050579398,0.00022658583,0.007602037,0.0006735853,0.00042392485,0.6265076,0.35422245,0.00011199944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027680138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05917196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97231984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006771938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009119048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14580446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803120","doi":"10.29173/mlj1471","title":"Limitations of the Common Law Adversarial Process: How Independent Judicial Research Could Have Avoided the Wrongful Conviction in R v Mullins- Johnson","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Conviction; Law; Common law; Economic Justice; Process (computing); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.1150156184311577,"score_gpt":0.28540539788527325,"score_spread":0.17038977945411554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803120","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11288513,0.00741963,0.11734732,0.42459646,0.001478778,0.00049926207,0.000102217855,0.00024505396,0.33542615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9505956,0.0010336891,0.014875352,0.02139513,0.00049910345,0.00023124012,0.000016092628,0.00005275755,0.011301009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9584042,0.025856035,0.0011626915,0.004744505,0.0061947647,0.003637792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9307026,0.050605193,0.0031536,0.0078739645,0.0051186318,0.0025460033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08739147,0.00055603136,0.0012866436,0.0017047705,0.007858922,0.012204148,0.004162995,0.013762312,0.0041043335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12489419,0.0006143961,0.0010970122,0.0008703708,0.0328414,0.012986635,0.00785707,0.012930924,0.0006826623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043977496,0.000030434067,0.0005756576,0.00003185295,0.000021116657,0.00015740207,0.0007765977,0.0014359033,0.00010642205,0.9871545,0.0031070367,0.006558917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009074347,0.000068421425,0.00055214396,0.00030183882,0.00004875061,0.00013140176,0.00056077563,0.004500344,0.00073264766,0.96792364,0.025026456,0.0000628455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024058685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022220403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9759413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010029741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020736635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4621758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413888318","doi":"10.63409/2025.53","title":"Bargaining for Salary Equity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CAUT Journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Salary; Equity (law); Business; Economics; Labour economics; Political science; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.0609434183864886,"score_gpt":0.2795341201189313,"score_spread":0.21859070173244272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413888318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04083117,0.0012034865,0.06201609,0.01666308,0.0005242477,0.00011057929,0.00006195806,0.00006787754,0.8785215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9110575,0.00035764131,0.0054208827,0.0027542724,0.00049672613,0.00011002378,0.000029336386,0.000057117486,0.07971653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99440765,0.0018313619,0.00013940534,0.00095097156,0.0014247836,0.0012458814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99614316,0.0017714427,0.00038169167,0.0007511409,0.00049502664,0.00045750136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063643456,0.000510443,0.00055263983,0.00074776716,0.0045189518,0.0061351196,0.00090761884,0.003006992,0.031849895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014690071,0.00028078514,0.0005670119,0.0007052063,0.009775915,0.004977159,0.006384599,0.00486982,0.002417834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000175921,0.000011052839,0.0004248058,0.000009575721,0.000005142886,0.000024686819,0.00044138788,0.00041890555,0.00021488093,0.98619777,0.001687404,0.01054687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003490521,0.00005644216,0.0012746607,0.00007142875,0.000011349897,0.00006948724,0.0005831072,0.0018244608,0.00036459145,0.94095814,0.05473431,0.000017212376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035402956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046833623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031849895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046989587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036699837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10654849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414086102","doi":"10.22215/apb.v1i1.4868","title":"The Growing Problem of ‘Cop-Baiting’ by the Public","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied police briefings :","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misinformation; Politics; Institution; Key (lock); Social media; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.01765180089273256,"score_gpt":0.20256859648421555,"score_spread":0.184916795591483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414086102","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007704841,0.025702773,0.0033346217,0.8142143,0.008562,0.000047017336,0.00026311167,0.00011423083,0.14005715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3557544,0.068325736,0.0037668354,0.44890708,0.024852214,0.00021657528,0.00041986094,0.00038368188,0.097373575],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832676,0.005000642,0.00053538685,0.0020284487,0.0060441336,0.0031237195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9633234,0.020589506,0.0037120618,0.0018107437,0.0071393186,0.0034249334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010732747,0.0006199385,0.0009009972,0.0018598364,0.015988706,0.013659816,0.0034446814,0.017422523,0.024429452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04723617,0.00069216394,0.0007082823,0.0033701549,0.016023267,0.014037825,0.0055631464,0.016324317,0.005361312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022029943,0.00002875516,0.002052941,0.00030473268,0.000013577641,0.00065171026,0.009183584,0.00022760755,0.000117060474,0.2931395,0.6265546,0.067703925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007939503,0.000024298008,0.002338567,0.00070487,0.000011310156,0.0010087099,0.009120461,0.000422616,0.00013313582,0.029291676,0.9568933,0.000043094413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17241225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18144219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17241225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017751716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023644362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414360438","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2025/995","title":"Set-Based Retrograde Analysis: Precomputing the Solution to 28-card Bridge Double Dummy Deals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bridge (graph theory); Partition (number theory); Computation; Chess endgame; Bidding; State (computer science); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.04813016457390037,"score_gpt":0.2589924612772238,"score_spread":0.21086229670332343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414360438","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14449136,0.00016772062,0.82800967,0.0006216666,0.00012578983,0.00022103597,0.0007811424,0.0021078964,0.023473741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48518094,0.00011355789,0.50478125,0.0002313726,0.00004406875,0.0002613604,0.0012254361,0.0005830897,0.007578953],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992781,0.00019081787,0.000037972393,0.00013709339,0.00018284793,0.0001731498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977475,0.0015311241,0.00009302689,0.00032931645,0.00021641118,0.0000826474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012319937,0.0011300299,0.0012351054,0.0010653737,0.00089083216,0.0019210185,0.0019207598,0.001190089,0.01573884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076037925,0.0006520734,0.0019094488,0.00074676983,0.0012783252,0.0024303347,0.0026260517,0.0025604703,0.0016692518],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046316613,0.00024081816,0.0031061524,0.00029256282,0.00009219415,0.00022418633,0.0004955456,0.6059408,0.0029931148,0.22159028,0.008653198,0.155908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005428077,0.0000615348,0.00015883322,0.000019102976,0.000019947176,0.000021334212,0.00010052847,0.88876814,0.0014187892,0.10692296,0.0024400898,0.000014467149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050437506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009787073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01573884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012688629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025339492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052651703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414533589","doi":"","title":"La transaction pénale pour les entreprises. Genèse, circulation et usage d’un dispositif judiciaire","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques","keywords":"Language change; Convention; Criminal law; Settlement (finance); Database transaction; Public interest; Criminal justice; Legal profession; Modernization theory","score_opus":0.028578658654461533,"score_gpt":0.2309228452144612,"score_spread":0.20234418655999964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414533589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0503716,0.014364033,0.03466837,0.028315978,0.0024541945,0.00033017193,0.0012659668,0.00041424134,0.8678154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5228268,0.0050397296,0.013671208,0.005792871,0.0015141489,0.00036562263,0.000800472,0.00026846406,0.44972068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896604,0.0026077814,0.0003255283,0.0010589523,0.00529089,0.0010564487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99331117,0.0030684026,0.00067344913,0.0010679864,0.0015547499,0.00032434362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043844907,0.0006959497,0.00035219142,0.0013276202,0.0036953802,0.0071493997,0.0011364244,0.0035156421,0.034821574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013310048,0.0003209766,0.0006279189,0.0009862981,0.003835813,0.0025887673,0.002274353,0.004615549,0.007956585],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054925207,0.000064072534,0.0014792172,0.000087720284,0.000029757954,0.0003815628,0.0015538948,0.00061296794,0.0011235356,0.8590484,0.057042837,0.07852107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033724766,0.00012353559,0.005724119,0.00032939902,0.00002571119,0.00097144645,0.000704826,0.0018965586,0.0016680653,0.050630275,0.9378361,0.00005631275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021777967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020935379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034821574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004064916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005999485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11648977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414590635","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2509.05367","title":"Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The Tension Between Ethical Reasoning and Safety Alignment in LLMs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Tsinghua University; Strong; Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Frame (networking); Ethical theories; Motivated reasoning; Poison control; Ethical issues; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.07003019765670702,"score_gpt":0.19254033651033395,"score_spread":0.12251013885362692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414590635","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11814918,0.00013565746,0.85871184,0.005225674,0.00004997603,0.00009386767,0.00014760064,0.0016693881,0.015816843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9166622,0.000048466016,0.08017562,0.0003777654,0.0000350607,0.00008504785,0.00008911663,0.0003348607,0.002191807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879027,0.008311405,0.00046569717,0.0010974245,0.0014381508,0.00078465935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703569,0.017214678,0.0022219873,0.008030184,0.0012735517,0.00090271956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010275699,0.0005927184,0.00087503734,0.00094599754,0.0015783365,0.006516211,0.002003135,0.0020909084,0.0054947725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04431304,0.00078705035,0.0014299327,0.0005834767,0.009111217,0.009758003,0.00803946,0.005435418,0.00092847017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017690261,0.00006720097,0.0026520102,0.00008764433,0.00006356286,0.00023689057,0.002605667,0.09134992,0.0020849323,0.87393624,0.0017366881,0.02500236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028029064,0.000034835623,0.0003449428,0.0000395984,0.000031875185,0.00005738075,0.0004701041,0.25312385,0.0027077787,0.7396503,0.0034796682,0.000031597283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035470678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003435801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010275699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031561763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002581264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05434376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415256555","doi":"10.4337/jlp.2025.02.03","title":"Perfecting imperfect duties through law","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Philosophy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Imperfect; Surprise; Normative; Flexibility (engineering); Moral responsibility; Private law","score_opus":0.030006125871553883,"score_gpt":0.2456046775991569,"score_spread":0.21559855172760303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415256555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084433675,0.0020799248,0.37901843,0.0507412,0.00069018,0.00024411888,0.00020351369,0.0005507455,0.4820382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93202686,0.000742804,0.046905246,0.0047112587,0.000324374,0.00022396784,0.00005976552,0.00016271941,0.014843065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98052084,0.008815412,0.0012658512,0.0031098316,0.0043615787,0.0019264797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721872,0.0099101765,0.0031699757,0.010093444,0.0031629459,0.0014762945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02667721,0.0006377274,0.0009758194,0.0016837271,0.0050134943,0.011289655,0.0021694708,0.00556004,0.004876202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040623747,0.0009506525,0.0010452085,0.00093689683,0.050909296,0.019960344,0.009079695,0.0076900674,0.0009960433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025373977,0.000005460312,0.0000924714,0.000008495997,0.0000034982475,0.000013276109,0.0003185124,0.0003777556,0.000056515524,0.9975533,0.00032714932,0.0012410327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000088361185,0.0000054277252,0.00007860007,0.000025428162,0.000003908612,0.000012900802,0.00010216041,0.00066614704,0.00010011073,0.9938844,0.0051048975,0.000007132188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055603697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004224244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02667721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006705877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010405397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14108425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415480558","doi":"10.64628/aam.fre39uark","title":"The federal government tables bail reform bill: 5 ways to strengthen Canada’s bail system","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph-Humber; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Legislature; State government","score_opus":0.01904604708200741,"score_gpt":0.18349873966959407,"score_spread":0.16445269258758666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415480558","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068596624,0.004991923,0.004622003,0.48002926,0.0032546537,0.0005962093,0.0049257497,0.0008219018,0.4321617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65135956,0.002199545,0.010422993,0.15115802,0.0011331042,0.00025291715,0.0012820459,0.00021024093,0.18198153],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98936903,0.0009531096,0.00018139924,0.00053298083,0.005683109,0.0032802993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877521,0.0014815219,0.00043733855,0.0005143119,0.006956732,0.0028580527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056959735,0.00058549334,0.0007762856,0.0024510452,0.008747629,0.01290718,0.0031156496,0.0076710233,0.02108651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024424504,0.00064338965,0.0007840056,0.0023136474,0.004612446,0.003160138,0.0023949153,0.006268949,0.001227166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099064586,0.0001233135,0.007855173,0.00011051306,0.00007221688,0.00010763824,0.0007636178,0.0016782492,0.00037189538,0.4160147,0.5403449,0.03245871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005427315,0.00014115879,0.04786776,0.00046921632,0.00029498147,0.000073252326,0.0017447066,0.00782185,0.0012237141,0.07882271,0.8607233,0.00027450937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98397404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99223185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11166431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11166431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2999424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8101851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415776276","doi":"10.1177/2631309x251362852","title":"Using Machine Learning to Predict Regulatory Fines: Enhancing Deterrence in White-Collar Financial Crime Enforcement","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Deterrence (psychology); Deterrence theory; Enforcement; Investment (military); Key (lock); Selection (genetic algorithm); Feature selection","score_opus":0.03909214800234215,"score_gpt":0.2367187351593333,"score_spread":0.19762658715699116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415776276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9111691,0.00034499165,0.0825202,0.0015116424,0.000045380897,0.00015068694,0.00015507815,0.00037926578,0.0037236346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98587036,0.00006325595,0.013354028,0.00009874349,0.000024464958,0.00002206796,0.00014264848,0.0000073193637,0.0004172664],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639636,0.002200158,0.00018402206,0.00036098078,0.00058243424,0.00027620455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806758,0.013608544,0.0029619348,0.00087482133,0.001513835,0.0003650316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064616897,0.00055289036,0.0009589485,0.0020290483,0.0005920618,0.0016621399,0.00077541167,0.0009827,0.0008806906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027479017,0.00029869936,0.0004394936,0.0008981751,0.00052743946,0.0011291665,0.0007761987,0.0014075736,0.00033750146],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005343501,0.0024999278,0.36436248,0.00010482195,0.00022861642,0.00014216034,0.0003183067,0.25724506,0.0013541284,0.0031645854,0.002874805,0.3671707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022419159,0.00020362005,0.038051184,0.000037223268,0.000027606296,0.000032821205,0.000091941336,0.9573134,0.001144838,0.002579165,0.00047305506,0.000022700307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007872356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008782774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007872356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007873106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015748258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03417313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416290387","doi":"10.29173/alr2815","title":"Pathways to Ruin? High-Risk Offending Over the Life Course, Erin Gibbs Van, Brunschot &amp; Tamara Humphrey (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2022)","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Life course approach","score_opus":0.025761083709583462,"score_gpt":0.23130749297341024,"score_spread":0.20554640926382678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416290387","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00811911,0.24771047,0.00056035107,0.6692549,0.003907107,0.000020300851,0.0016196322,0.000041151216,0.06876702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3638125,0.45211235,0.00075183576,0.07397477,0.010822581,0.000091814734,0.0012148283,0.000087216,0.0971322],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991906,0.00022018225,0.00003112703,0.00007825298,0.00016503679,0.00031479727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642664,0.0010765028,0.0003434802,0.00008615946,0.0006962307,0.0013709746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017091517,0.00045259405,0.00042902582,0.0012683481,0.0037291136,0.0060529704,0.0011465728,0.005908119,0.013702689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010216777,0.00050249713,0.00031820484,0.0018977426,0.0042436537,0.0044514174,0.0022618575,0.0054081976,0.0015800919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004564334,0.000041537693,0.0064576906,0.0001010079,0.000017000764,0.00025780825,0.0017426563,0.00024563313,0.000029122111,0.10562302,0.83333725,0.05210161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043565153,0.000038098642,0.074359104,0.002760013,0.000053560205,0.0006396671,0.017841492,0.00071686687,0.00008242486,0.17886744,0.72452176,0.000076029784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37315792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68251073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37315792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010774276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015506201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7419718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416377023","doi":"10.1017/9781108641784.014","title":"Transforming Chilling Effects Doctrine","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Privilege (computing); Skepticism; Common law; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.01859724271627618,"score_gpt":0.17779285172961515,"score_spread":0.15919560901333896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416377023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010442576,0.0043947683,0.072517715,0.042093016,0.002204677,0.00006611742,0.00007734828,0.00023142395,0.86797243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60641336,0.007036329,0.02801172,0.04816653,0.003698626,0.00030497974,0.00012728393,0.0004525484,0.3057886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696475,0.0007964607,0.00009736972,0.00034913607,0.0013682495,0.00042398763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632496,0.0020836596,0.00018304991,0.00049733784,0.0007217793,0.00018928101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035738596,0.00036945226,0.00035295237,0.00105852,0.0027279388,0.0057595177,0.0015970134,0.0043096044,0.010176149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008196472,0.00036550636,0.0006400455,0.0006413981,0.013829289,0.005874961,0.0036328924,0.010754352,0.0022027192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010737269,0.000003371372,0.000019935127,0.000003909555,4.548493e-7,0.000016189391,0.00019743212,0.000068878086,0.00003024969,0.9944787,0.0031152738,0.0020645747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063470234,0.000012296014,0.00009332942,0.00006635198,0.0000037462728,0.000056099874,0.00023251823,0.00044627255,0.000261657,0.8303101,0.1685029,0.000008407043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051345984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00467802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010176149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004474032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043387776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034042597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416664879","doi":"10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i06.61697","title":"Bridging the Justice Gap: Legal Expense Insurance and Its Prospects in India","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Empowerment; Bridging (networking); Stakeholder; Economic Justice; Civil society; Legal research; Scope (computer science)","score_opus":0.0954966856661559,"score_gpt":0.3850934942622408,"score_spread":0.28959680859608494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416664879","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53953594,0.005189453,0.0075952415,0.055760518,0.00024318218,0.00012511775,0.00013116805,0.000105077146,0.3913143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897295,0.0014627085,0.0011723313,0.0025900581,0.000048724567,0.000025092048,0.000029078208,0.000013621003,0.0049287663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966028,0.0010809165,0.00010835313,0.00024704807,0.00094175787,0.001019167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959125,0.0024270818,0.0005547278,0.00026177336,0.00047133944,0.0003726218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033840067,0.00016854875,0.00022445511,0.0015178097,0.0040467205,0.009099872,0.0014318193,0.0018609928,0.0040494753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055466443,0.00018791207,0.0005068934,0.0017975613,0.011886033,0.0047074743,0.0068794177,0.0042802626,0.00024236683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028824403,0.000047173366,0.0040409826,0.00007774829,0.0000072512626,0.0005297947,0.005597317,0.0005360617,0.00040122072,0.97039896,0.0014164157,0.0169182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000661595,0.0005015143,0.07073508,0.001534314,0.00016559105,0.002474455,0.06921738,0.0065713986,0.0050250557,0.40681896,0.43660676,0.00028332195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027156215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033226524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027156215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010169851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012290942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07378775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417309305","doi":"10.1080/14631180.2025.2559473","title":"Fraudulent Lives: Imagining Welfare Cheats from the Poor Law to the Present","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family & Community History","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poor law; Welfare; Poor people; Poverty; Welfare system","score_opus":0.05231143741955247,"score_gpt":0.2265229216593403,"score_spread":0.17421148423978783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417309305","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101752095,0.020773767,0.0032585894,0.6220113,0.0011422734,0.000021842707,0.000083840554,0.000033351444,0.25092292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569184,0.008756038,0.0005534635,0.02078029,0.0005419093,0.00002773135,0.000019816964,0.00002813836,0.012374152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967018,0.0024273682,0.000026989783,0.00009884303,0.00025304587,0.0004919287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99101263,0.0058501055,0.00079853705,0.0003794755,0.00082917913,0.001130079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058073285,0.0003962623,0.00034521156,0.001969074,0.012415807,0.011710231,0.0010857189,0.006114792,0.0044786367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013757187,0.00027685333,0.00028051384,0.0016957151,0.044757057,0.01756796,0.005514235,0.008359343,0.0004783011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057007248,0.00006733971,0.00392905,0.000074385585,0.000017461087,0.00044783397,0.14737181,0.00022170742,0.000070785354,0.75218236,0.07022436,0.025335912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001912584,0.000035776855,0.0028864155,0.00054329075,0.0000171634,0.00026705328,0.22166032,0.00046167322,0.00011637757,0.61821705,0.1557494,0.000026425016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011634874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018199323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012415807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007292297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003395933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052909613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W568743436","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511802034.011","title":"Refining the Classification of Schemes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Refining (metallurgy); Computer science; Materials science; Metallurgy","score_opus":0.0627433596575717,"score_gpt":0.19089994078420217,"score_spread":0.12815658112663048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W568743436","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01607161,0.003649941,0.5892002,0.014227772,0.0013438886,0.00051016605,0.00081113895,0.0011910986,0.37299418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29284802,0.002879132,0.59073985,0.0029546975,0.0006329214,0.00069306354,0.0015058813,0.0009256389,0.10682083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874242,0.0062243813,0.0009926789,0.0018010552,0.0028881233,0.0006696242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810157,0.006552618,0.00076600077,0.0066342726,0.0045217485,0.00050975557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014834323,0.0008121503,0.0009955519,0.0048397197,0.003994569,0.011581451,0.0029258206,0.003003212,0.015881026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02508998,0.0007937783,0.0014080509,0.0052541965,0.014865514,0.025656734,0.004684254,0.008255752,0.0044918205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006123324,0.0000032790895,0.00012292927,0.000020633373,0.0000015540635,0.000006242822,0.0008603099,0.00016175602,0.00006547861,0.9843634,0.0039971005,0.010391278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013275109,0.000020028041,0.0004336772,0.00017243817,0.000010587272,0.00010887661,0.0008816394,0.0041595744,0.00032048378,0.6782699,0.3155784,0.000031095475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009441679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008189532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015881026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007746507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004458703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07845235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W570441982","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198267973.001.0001","title":"Tort Liability Under Uncertainty","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Liability; Actuarial science; Business; Law and economics; Economics; Accounting","score_opus":0.03487428922969436,"score_gpt":0.19193769087111467,"score_spread":0.15706340164142032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W570441982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026669607,0.025061926,0.06970377,0.049123723,0.0013517918,0.000089505804,0.00026005862,0.00009842249,0.8276412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91046315,0.015443604,0.005977252,0.004554419,0.0027975035,0.00012464389,0.00013057934,0.000043200016,0.0604656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940102,0.0022043162,0.00028755804,0.0005362202,0.002360024,0.0006016583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929624,0.0050599026,0.0005273301,0.000514348,0.00074878096,0.00018724792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004226736,0.00064162485,0.0007511628,0.0013794381,0.00252428,0.0070864265,0.0010423502,0.0049043377,0.005393572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011087741,0.00035457287,0.00072955823,0.0011668879,0.01329985,0.0062464694,0.004008111,0.0045457534,0.0007911081],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002650323,0.0000030496828,0.00006386487,0.000018821129,0.000003595715,0.00009902241,0.00020937569,0.0011874539,0.00003777256,0.9937577,0.0020233733,0.0025932095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024161313,0.000009768492,0.00011657426,0.00010932084,0.0000047275066,0.00011628612,0.0001980332,0.0011045728,0.00006501683,0.97285694,0.025408994,0.0000072714597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022707097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012274992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070864265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044327215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030670129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03216183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W573885993","doi":"","title":"The History and Methodology of Law and Economics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Schools of economic thought; Comparative law; Public law; Law; Applied economics; Political science; Economics; Neoclassical economics","score_opus":0.0654336079117135,"score_gpt":0.20190193279403684,"score_spread":0.13646832488232336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W573885993","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032795486,0.31144086,0.1361561,0.085189156,0.010784887,0.00023840061,0.0009065807,0.0004325585,0.45157194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33213687,0.26437902,0.12919925,0.027824815,0.03688556,0.0018037604,0.0011836098,0.0011528224,0.20543435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818117,0.011982302,0.0008910021,0.001725143,0.0031568017,0.00043300452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97164357,0.02223875,0.00095104845,0.002233805,0.0025154857,0.00041730303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011943034,0.00089989393,0.0013053574,0.006595259,0.0030860943,0.010656758,0.0015598461,0.0026937106,0.011822069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024997469,0.00087522547,0.0009448985,0.0063797277,0.021352481,0.009698752,0.0028856653,0.0063998387,0.003921754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009497565,0.0000124861945,0.00026421944,0.00023025836,0.000014421758,0.000034602403,0.0008231581,0.00030791762,0.000043432436,0.9329989,0.03268754,0.0325737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062864533,0.000013496524,0.00039257656,0.00073554355,0.0000066383363,0.00006694152,0.00046995547,0.0004942314,0.000086561035,0.5600043,0.43770826,0.000015125687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00490145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027324308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011943034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010231136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007133337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07423246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W58716808","doi":"","title":"After \"Whiten\": punitive damages for breach of contract in Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of business law","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Breach of contract; Law; Business; Unjust enrichment; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Restitution","score_opus":0.018336216542116684,"score_gpt":0.19517894648794887,"score_spread":0.1768427299458322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W58716808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7586875,0.0035865735,0.0013464802,0.07440225,0.0006816208,0.00032128824,0.0013409557,0.00017309711,0.15946029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9439026,0.0010545414,0.00046506518,0.008414732,0.00007509459,0.000047601825,0.0002158884,0.000030899213,0.045793563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988856,0.0006790906,0.0002994427,0.0005668549,0.003640628,0.0059580356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824867,0.0043173023,0.0013123966,0.00046969045,0.0073845056,0.004029403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004738667,0.000443338,0.00083500234,0.0025128818,0.020851977,0.0076498147,0.0036249114,0.0110130515,0.010634304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031665675,0.0008374083,0.000749605,0.003675653,0.004111501,0.0017002561,0.0037199142,0.009006011,0.00045076673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009784434,0.0008936271,0.20072518,0.00036094335,0.00038690897,0.0043921485,0.023600606,0.014411287,0.0013694946,0.27380884,0.37011182,0.1089608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005385207,0.0004665506,0.539384,0.0006911406,0.00076563715,0.0013910688,0.059503973,0.024185058,0.0027439382,0.0394103,0.3301494,0.00077036856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14461432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14461432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30413997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99212617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W587356876","doi":"","title":"Saluting Judge Philip Pro's Quarter Century of Nevada District Service","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Las vegas; Magistrate; Law; Public defender; State (computer science); Political science; Dozen; Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.025034926317637016,"score_gpt":0.21775725153874284,"score_spread":0.19272232522110583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W587356876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025663393,0.011157667,0.0016692147,0.16077307,0.015835328,0.00014695877,0.00043791684,0.00041502278,0.7839014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09208251,0.0020669915,0.0007085927,0.042602655,0.0009086089,0.000071367576,0.00021453264,0.00008658657,0.86125815],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791104,0.00019622472,0.00006600973,0.0004385397,0.00088038575,0.00050773344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763334,0.00038172916,0.000070531525,0.00010020326,0.0011565062,0.0006578034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015145418,0.00038014608,0.00039508447,0.0007985202,0.009861634,0.005582437,0.0011069804,0.004846718,0.035333566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004476422,0.00039176826,0.00026700023,0.00031572965,0.0015431055,0.0015844429,0.0025409975,0.006321969,0.0046789637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036995443,0.000041153096,0.0026108804,0.000055571916,0.000010583453,0.0009673027,0.0009408056,0.000155249,0.00083532475,0.060507033,0.90866786,0.025171226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008621651,0.000022120441,0.0014134756,0.00008606639,0.0000069187654,0.00020565526,0.00093300204,0.0001595775,0.0004460763,0.0020813812,0.9946207,0.00001652262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13424386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32534176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13424386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056619802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014110084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26692492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W600926385","doi":"","title":"Government Litigation in Canada: Influences on Judicial Decision Making in Comparative Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Judicial opinion; Law; Business; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05987988840638555,"score_gpt":0.24378125305297224,"score_spread":0.18390136464658668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W600926385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77469,0.007893882,0.00049827225,0.029966064,0.0001140506,0.00006743517,0.0021944793,0.000028646964,0.18454717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99184906,0.0015925268,0.00019815318,0.0010277528,0.00003089812,0.000011210094,0.0002743411,0.000013399234,0.005002719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99301505,0.0008973439,0.0001848559,0.00048014964,0.0028442962,0.0025782196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97060734,0.009446096,0.0019310268,0.00049566483,0.014888762,0.0026311283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053299195,0.00026258783,0.0007923488,0.0052628065,0.013684727,0.011480599,0.0020608313,0.002824299,0.014200181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032660685,0.0002848844,0.0005504542,0.011165915,0.0056031113,0.0032649918,0.0020255414,0.0025394703,0.00045201974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010028756,0.0004566716,0.26755217,0.0005680482,0.00041729634,0.0018588727,0.035412308,0.010238692,0.0012355106,0.5363087,0.06944602,0.07550291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024807226,0.00014529568,0.7486432,0.0009357463,0.00054037356,0.00043606063,0.09024893,0.0070718937,0.0010633882,0.040806387,0.10954839,0.0003121766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99851733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18918662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18918662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20861235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9404286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W605077644","doi":"","title":"Home Country Bias in the Legal System: Empirical Evidence from the Intellectual Property Rights Protection in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Welfare; Innovator; Oligopoly; Economics; Business; Public economics; Political science; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.12607045292911293,"score_gpt":0.27879734211530366,"score_spread":0.15272688918619073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W605077644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98052067,0.001581003,0.0003642254,0.0024784515,0.000016190988,0.000059240334,0.0014394112,0.00001621242,0.013524597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972255,0.0006583307,0.00010910947,0.00020716066,0.000008995199,0.000005778224,0.00041561006,0.0000061090536,0.0013634263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937921,0.0005814157,0.00023008436,0.00075160427,0.0029113265,0.001733484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713717,0.006873655,0.009670717,0.0012753585,0.0081971055,0.002611381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034591588,0.00025574514,0.0008963981,0.002357197,0.0047915573,0.0032685348,0.0015584693,0.0011750887,0.00329545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022836514,0.0002923802,0.00054530235,0.0061329105,0.003196312,0.00096116523,0.001480929,0.0015629476,0.00025493058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026612822,0.00023762912,0.9430114,0.0001638371,0.00027407816,0.00071185856,0.00737311,0.0030853637,0.0004187595,0.008885512,0.009387871,0.026184436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064370994,0.000057128775,0.97897446,0.00011384504,0.00016262851,0.0001784938,0.006824384,0.0037420937,0.00043718287,0.0010832202,0.008301623,0.00006046928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04929091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04929091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055593576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35763228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W616144456","doi":"","title":"The Ethics of Executive Compensation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Executive compensation; Compensation (psychology); Economic Justice; Corporate social responsibility; Law and economics; Management; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Pay for performance; Political science; Law; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04743888161356624,"score_gpt":0.2316773559332264,"score_spread":0.18423847431966014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W616144456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013578313,0.18493657,0.0040168297,0.2239649,0.011204563,0.000038276547,0.00021306293,0.00013993504,0.5741281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.111269034,0.0699362,0.004533051,0.06681921,0.018244717,0.00016740672,0.00023704284,0.00019647213,0.72859687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99400157,0.0019644746,0.00034819267,0.0006191441,0.0022950284,0.00077162706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969285,0.0010295066,0.00028414855,0.00035609922,0.0009836459,0.0004180989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003552288,0.00075902254,0.0005137946,0.0019694807,0.002983128,0.008471234,0.0010224266,0.004683029,0.02127318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009137926,0.00032810878,0.00042421944,0.0014977576,0.00590682,0.0036810194,0.0019079145,0.004140121,0.009763653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010409947,0.000012012587,0.00021949146,0.00006907257,0.000004876429,0.000039718758,0.0005507975,0.000109355555,0.00004433737,0.57533324,0.3752889,0.04831772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029150433,0.0000049444093,0.00027003232,0.00023617821,0.000001449397,0.000048345242,0.00019454671,0.00004126265,0.000028356619,0.08860815,0.91055876,0.0000051404845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040958175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061056847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02127318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004046428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005799466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0711658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W68076504","doi":"10.7202/803063ar","title":"Les aspects économiques de la protection de la société","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"L Actualité économique","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Criminology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04473646660387255,"score_gpt":0.25817397374834544,"score_spread":0.2134375071444729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W68076504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041156303,0.042850588,0.05994873,0.08900518,0.0010766094,0.00006258615,0.0006286875,0.00007857529,0.7651926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89767504,0.035181478,0.008445108,0.0027197937,0.0027369368,0.00024347797,0.00029940993,0.000051943076,0.052646823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963229,0.0013250784,0.00009677932,0.00034029075,0.0014515439,0.00046343473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977471,0.0013357615,0.00023682379,0.00020598756,0.00033294695,0.00014142379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029107456,0.00055567827,0.000520005,0.0023641258,0.0019170191,0.007888338,0.0005685881,0.0025415546,0.008882657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057401415,0.00039412692,0.0005609027,0.0026507077,0.008743698,0.0065653967,0.0016190661,0.0029991113,0.0011481418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044788285,0.0000044625076,0.00014861519,0.000014957603,0.000003137312,0.00001800079,0.0001009816,0.00051471515,0.000037255097,0.9950814,0.00085095875,0.003221004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008580722,0.000012730427,0.0019082709,0.000081793114,0.0000051818474,0.00012493781,0.0002588268,0.001498842,0.000075560245,0.91309327,0.08291936,0.000012555791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01285721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008375739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01285721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064834794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028759197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047041178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6955393150","doi":"10.58079/vkfv","title":"Appel à contributions : Représentation de l’enfance et de la jeunesse dans la littérature de l’Anthropocène","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Industrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SAINT; Intervention (counseling); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.021119147288168025,"score_gpt":0.2749300138220334,"score_spread":0.25381086653386536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6955393150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008205012,0.10463035,0.0075155003,0.21627903,0.101024784,0.00027141898,0.0029018472,0.00037173342,0.55880034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.093040004,0.04896719,0.0028994307,0.023913292,0.018583745,0.00038912895,0.0010740281,0.00065998506,0.81047326],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970047,0.0011489681,0.00020979153,0.00046332087,0.00089709787,0.00027611316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920441,0.003304967,0.00053283334,0.00070210896,0.002402991,0.0010129545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004808682,0.00083307823,0.00043523023,0.0024881517,0.00650439,0.004630241,0.0012678831,0.0036364016,0.023719063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010028235,0.00029632697,0.0005138434,0.0028598893,0.003387933,0.0036396421,0.0028924483,0.0025780457,0.007793106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047488982,0.000015930409,0.0010432911,0.00027177567,0.0000092421915,0.00028368452,0.011513986,0.0000593819,0.00034235237,0.07248553,0.870735,0.043192264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015644762,0.0000050613285,0.0007985383,0.00015805796,0.0000020333905,0.000073350006,0.0010953677,0.000015231593,0.00010357127,0.001626404,0.9961152,0.000005607838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035062768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05894507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035062768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003580791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00542205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07934821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6976694045","doi":"10.6068/dp14bafc9bc2341","title":"Trend 2000 - 2014. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Current Population Survey: Union Affiliation Statistics: Employed Full-Time | Country: USA | Seasonally Adjusted: Non-Seasonally Adjusted | Demographic Indicator: - Percent of employed, Employed full time, Wage and salary workers, Represented by unions, 2000-2014. Data-Planet™ Statistical Ready Reference by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 002-028-002.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Data Planet","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Current Population Survey; Census; Salary; Population; Earnings; Wage; Sample (material); Population statistics; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.034518615185801405,"score_gpt":0.2646216318525137,"score_spread":0.2301030166667123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6976694045","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012887885,0.000045275523,0.00007076129,0.00010055856,0.00005993704,0.000038093138,0.99849033,0.00007064673,0.0009955241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007178356,0.00014474074,0.00037560138,0.0001853527,0.000033208053,0.00046778147,0.9957417,0.00008593264,0.0022477969],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977762,0.00033768688,0.00042668285,0.00047586046,0.00064594287,0.00033756404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99043524,0.0009647446,0.0008563661,0.00056416367,0.0067420173,0.00043754338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020061315,0.0016711608,0.0018474374,0.0038282569,0.0008888482,0.0024527002,0.0031059375,0.0013639383,0.08699444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016412774,0.0013801536,0.001295839,0.014684745,0.00026088368,0.0028233912,0.0019100159,0.002965295,0.092681766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034606768,0.000014820898,0.0013498212,0.00032522873,0.000016609574,0.000005662388,0.000024798637,0.00006266595,0.000020911484,0.00029551366,0.99572456,0.002124762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038908893,0.000046300705,0.036241494,0.0012970751,0.00008186051,0.000045031247,0.00048936653,0.00034505708,0.00018159836,0.0011629922,0.9596587,0.00006133379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15749866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11335245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15749866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028507647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056181047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31316382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982748504","doi":"","title":"1787 It's Complicated","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMU Scholoraly Commons (James Madison University)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); Orientation (vector space); Key (lock); Payment","score_opus":0.030675595279647826,"score_gpt":0.20065392561463918,"score_spread":0.16997833033499135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982748504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045715824,0.003906661,0.0052631474,0.24292724,0.03731593,0.00036384285,0.0004581628,0.0014471012,0.6626021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10212431,0.002822737,0.0041344236,0.09120723,0.0030474036,0.00027490983,0.00054695824,0.0009227209,0.79491925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998104,0.0005551627,0.000064159234,0.0002246372,0.0005242823,0.00052784936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955419,0.00024876615,0.00018116723,0.00016208841,0.0011466993,0.0027194463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001968049,0.00076428655,0.0003620343,0.00041563084,0.0068395627,0.0061005363,0.0009322842,0.0025273762,0.14874202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005973372,0.00039230628,0.00046802373,0.00032471778,0.0031596485,0.003944549,0.0058290605,0.004931275,0.05183344],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044262408,0.00008516308,0.0016405653,0.00012477745,0.0000061863084,0.00036423226,0.007993122,0.000037376518,0.00085658615,0.006436416,0.9307183,0.051693156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005479025,0.000045845834,0.0009572573,0.00010715851,0.0000024478488,0.00018189986,0.011245613,0.000028323671,0.0001817308,0.0013290124,0.98589885,0.000016384136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006599543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01516797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14874202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026856088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047684307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4975916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989387469","doi":"","title":"Assumption of Responsibility and Loss of Bargain in\\nTort Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Doctrine; Damages; Privity of contract; Product (mathematics); Dual (grammatical number); Common law; Job loss","score_opus":0.017759789471898525,"score_gpt":0.22262648655868356,"score_spread":0.20486669708678504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989387469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08767164,0.0014397363,0.22786494,0.026123771,0.00038294474,0.00014398563,0.00006834333,0.00016105309,0.6561436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749444,0.00045091863,0.005456556,0.0024596208,0.00020837165,0.000095007905,0.00001537894,0.000021726557,0.016347913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900851,0.0033388785,0.00047783824,0.0012050263,0.003347787,0.0015452406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99366105,0.003826163,0.0006442927,0.0009408052,0.0006289579,0.00029875184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008442836,0.0004049485,0.0005620053,0.00088953483,0.0035131706,0.0067811813,0.0017866248,0.0053840443,0.0032739048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016812298,0.00048068448,0.00090695586,0.00045936593,0.022912161,0.009271351,0.005746802,0.0057137385,0.0006065016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027714905,0.0000059671193,0.00010517315,0.000003670074,0.0000013403687,0.00007360364,0.00034834992,0.00028194714,0.000034933015,0.9979366,0.0003555172,0.0008501547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000855479,0.000015403366,0.00017472546,0.0000334339,0.0000058266655,0.00014138773,0.00022718233,0.0027688304,0.00019809925,0.9872292,0.00918525,0.000012099053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004666006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031563789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008442836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045470395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050363718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044650495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991067762","doi":"","title":"Everyday Legal Problems and the Cost of Justice in Canada – Income Report","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sample (material); Line (geometry); Government (linguistics); Legal action","score_opus":0.017876476196026947,"score_gpt":0.20768952458035622,"score_spread":0.18981304838432927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991067762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8463195,0.0037507361,0.00019679577,0.008972292,0.00015013698,0.00023062083,0.095771074,0.00004684989,0.04456206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483994,0.0036170925,0.0003899105,0.00073966896,0.00007238211,0.00007743075,0.033646796,0.000019906107,0.013037345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804354,0.000100386635,0.000115553994,0.00008520223,0.001030459,0.0006248411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934915,0.00022863236,0.00119109,0.00010897182,0.0034095894,0.0015702564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008020347,0.000277221,0.00035462293,0.0034823455,0.0031790107,0.0021449479,0.0011245244,0.0005859905,0.004264602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004975492,0.0003286062,0.00066942826,0.0073582465,0.00060564576,0.00071840757,0.0012147259,0.0014825326,0.0003590966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047137353,0.00012572718,0.9302541,0.00007888979,0.000119449476,0.00015373538,0.0013969215,0.0005392157,0.000032809377,0.0015463108,0.050536074,0.015169659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066614098,0.000009176515,0.9872989,0.0000496525,0.00002323456,0.000045349756,0.0012513895,0.00033568076,0.000024192674,0.000078419034,0.010858682,0.000018611308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99744606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041678663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041678663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0448365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3024013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996234496","doi":"","title":"Retaliation: Why an Increase in Claims Does Not Mean the Sky Is Falling","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cornell Peter and Stephanie Nolan School of Hotel Administration (Cornell University)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Killam Trusts","keywords":"Supreme court; Plaintiff; Falling (accident); White (mutation); Opposition (politics); White paper; Government (linguistics); State supreme court; Metropolitan area; Tort","score_opus":0.04264617332548453,"score_gpt":0.20215544806326788,"score_spread":0.15950927473778334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996234496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59473825,0.0175785,0.0069013895,0.17101501,0.0013706099,0.000086170134,0.00070207054,0.00013668316,0.20747125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816961,0.001520165,0.00067482976,0.00878934,0.00056757795,0.000017078915,0.00006878439,0.000037034173,0.006629071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509805,0.0014531771,0.0002683082,0.0007135547,0.0018281516,0.00063876674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97688216,0.011527544,0.0065801586,0.0010977029,0.0032361457,0.00067625934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043722326,0.00022436182,0.00028855086,0.0016700291,0.003368008,0.0052516796,0.0007423876,0.0038020806,0.005609914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034330226,0.00023831234,0.00033963416,0.0017357334,0.0060571837,0.0052777277,0.0014051615,0.003559264,0.0009944708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035413107,0.00018718408,0.17376958,0.00033079094,0.00010625473,0.002513752,0.019610478,0.0015419634,0.0020536631,0.51488274,0.14734666,0.13730273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009341526,0.00028820723,0.37314245,0.0009077193,0.00016006062,0.002729782,0.03009446,0.0068972483,0.005249372,0.30703732,0.27317053,0.00022941954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016437795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016288238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016437795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002897821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012705541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032684267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998760487","doi":"","title":"Arbitration using the closest offer principle of arbitrator behaviour","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brock University Digital Repository (Brock University)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Compulsory arbitration","score_opus":0.021706748187369618,"score_gpt":0.18675129488019096,"score_spread":0.16504454669282134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998760487","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026054002,0.00037822596,0.84091365,0.005008215,0.00023697609,0.00022213045,0.0001307117,0.00029285564,0.12676324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8168063,0.0005069878,0.13316564,0.00089864316,0.0005774487,0.00044437853,0.00013613168,0.00030609718,0.047158454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98394,0.007833633,0.00067122997,0.0024088281,0.003904749,0.0012414771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9808898,0.011456399,0.0011419218,0.0036893361,0.0021225023,0.0006999704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013171733,0.0007446628,0.0020377259,0.0015130183,0.0028875459,0.007739368,0.0036591475,0.006667643,0.018043764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061952394,0.00087540847,0.0028479102,0.0014307976,0.006025618,0.014014099,0.004991275,0.007284852,0.002904729],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026243795,0.000015412004,0.00011555356,0.000019435425,0.000015099071,0.000033436132,0.00011952923,0.002591651,0.00017614705,0.99168867,0.00097281544,0.0042260406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021429263,0.00001546961,0.000068478876,0.000009976135,0.000008391571,0.00005587287,0.000025011163,0.020941395,0.00012862057,0.97700024,0.0017146992,0.000010371956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009029644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007831081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018043764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019474938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030958313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06965959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999419978","doi":"","title":"Contract Law Illegality Spreadsheet","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Focus (optics); Breach of contract; Construction contract; Contract management","score_opus":0.09946065549583381,"score_gpt":0.2723622245007892,"score_spread":0.17290156900495535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999419978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015061212,0.0007588965,0.045208342,0.0026067733,0.0008051407,0.0028946653,0.40088153,0.10816442,0.42361897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.063058205,0.0023020688,0.10437618,0.004128315,0.0008405497,0.004854725,0.3739623,0.028411388,0.41806632],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990864,0.00009155077,0.00013783011,0.00008537271,0.00051844935,0.00008048028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98567384,0.00746042,0.0010568106,0.0010111642,0.004292891,0.0005048423],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012883082,0.00087481225,0.00062054355,0.008610573,0.0007634545,0.0020762477,0.0011563115,0.0014223895,0.37616193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01291719,0.0008304129,0.00049546506,0.0045178384,0.00023301452,0.0021125306,0.0012172207,0.001380855,0.1305753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025417804,0.00022044864,0.0016811315,0.00055342406,0.000020663218,0.00025197738,0.00012671307,0.0016111949,0.0008468821,0.0050355396,0.8744709,0.11492693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033246586,0.00012706991,0.006873415,0.000855071,0.00003668507,0.00059615326,0.00017614829,0.006086506,0.003794181,0.0110821,0.9699284,0.00011187402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003710763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004988995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37616193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008722238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019613358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8898293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001881685","doi":"","title":"&lt;em&gt;El polaquito&lt;/em&gt;","year":2000,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"HELIN Digital Commons","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Field (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.022856067640967256,"score_gpt":0.2212771117706753,"score_spread":0.19842104412970804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001881685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022132578,0.003683371,0.0015038647,0.062959455,0.005452861,0.000055528253,0.0007097598,0.00045529343,0.9229666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0129719945,0.00085884373,0.0003541454,0.00330631,0.00048316093,0.000018198514,0.00011301196,0.00020232395,0.98169196],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877447,0.00020873913,0.000054327124,0.00028887126,0.0004014162,0.00027225236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857926,0.00018892283,0.00010460628,0.00018412505,0.00057893636,0.00036413118],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012199896,0.0006370859,0.00041797647,0.0010159333,0.004119572,0.007479972,0.00096804515,0.00463854,0.30554077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035863705,0.00043007717,0.00041355257,0.0008900727,0.0025361858,0.0037391111,0.0034069116,0.0036609387,0.1426834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006376799,0.000023924127,0.000819915,0.00010491429,0.0000046324712,0.00029061595,0.0007561949,0.000080859216,0.00066133664,0.09603072,0.8345837,0.0665794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028088632,0.000003622999,0.00048269355,0.000045799632,0.0000014933019,0.00006658839,0.00023985602,0.000053979722,0.00021984348,0.002530604,0.99634784,0.0000049776872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020117238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03823338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30554077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045607095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043982957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9905618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009613108","doi":"","title":"Everyday Legal Problems and the Cost of Justice in Canada: Survey","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Empirical research; Social justice; Cost estimate; Cost–benefit analysis","score_opus":0.026352715434010597,"score_gpt":0.202661630624582,"score_spread":0.1763089151905714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009613108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96709234,0.0014739659,0.00013844462,0.0059218104,0.00003496808,0.00019501324,0.009529087,0.000016552507,0.015597935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98818433,0.002442226,0.00026810213,0.0008434406,0.000025010406,0.000082130326,0.003896801,0.000016986773,0.004241066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99550337,0.00037438347,0.0002675843,0.000226739,0.0023946436,0.0012333506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778845,0.0023192093,0.004999462,0.00052290864,0.008765088,0.0055087707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023184095,0.00030985806,0.00060656085,0.0051506218,0.010317231,0.0051319995,0.002423331,0.0014372364,0.0056274226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015438765,0.0006345296,0.0006159164,0.012587917,0.0031759934,0.002259643,0.0034625349,0.0033848062,0.0004593488],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053234693,0.00028889303,0.93014103,0.00014188526,0.00006301046,0.00017744135,0.018260961,0.00044855755,0.000059046375,0.0035293007,0.025281454,0.02155522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010165523,0.000026278496,0.94716847,0.00013871513,0.00001738805,0.00006688509,0.035639167,0.0006450056,0.000044369688,0.0003418506,0.015846593,0.00005506809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08455164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08455164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1029292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61346793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009811515","doi":"","title":"Examining Corporate Litigation: Market Reactions, Resource Allocation, and Trial Outcomes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Odds; Officer; Litigation risk analysis; Sample (material); Stock market; Set (abstract data type); Stock (firearms); Resource (disambiguation)","score_opus":0.19476600422614518,"score_gpt":0.2786069309880342,"score_spread":0.083840926761889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009811515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977496,0.00010007436,0.000112438,0.00011435239,0.0000031047405,0.000071632276,0.00012837394,0.0000015658285,0.0017188631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854624,0.00014825659,0.00018827753,0.00008635336,0.000013387411,0.00009759581,0.00020723866,0.0000032034357,0.0007094926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99459934,0.0014589819,0.0006975222,0.00034600493,0.0021960058,0.0007022237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9411016,0.023793977,0.027825143,0.0011497432,0.0042921365,0.0018374439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056095016,0.00026095807,0.0005523065,0.0030291798,0.0018567947,0.004076527,0.0009842231,0.00077295204,0.0036394275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0413166,0.00025676566,0.0003867718,0.002458778,0.0013401997,0.0021647925,0.0019667626,0.0012491904,0.0003670314],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008679275,0.00038971475,0.9787723,0.00008327242,0.00004971935,0.00023555958,0.00931177,0.00010642593,0.00051034725,0.00038330033,0.0003300531,0.009740683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046486703,0.000113071015,0.984219,0.000023894812,0.000014092025,0.00012527392,0.014255564,0.00023297736,0.00023834105,0.0001449611,0.00061718904,0.000010984409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02208538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051933758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02208538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020498997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019655246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043913662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017047762","doi":"","title":"Adjudicating Uncertain Facts – The Case for Procedural Legitimacy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Civil procedure; Set (abstract data type); Procedural law; Civil litigation; Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Procedural justice","score_opus":0.03834420567154147,"score_gpt":0.2555581892390082,"score_spread":0.21721398356746674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017047762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012004266,0.009816227,0.07895071,0.67858857,0.0036940759,0.0001037074,0.00008789437,0.00012294999,0.21663159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8420349,0.0050298823,0.019754939,0.09850597,0.012290796,0.00039341795,0.000065619766,0.0003105409,0.021613957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.891516,0.05225076,0.00506855,0.009998859,0.03423021,0.0069356146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.818489,0.15112479,0.005332362,0.009774995,0.013741158,0.0015375885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0805498,0.00077431404,0.0016231362,0.003524584,0.013633142,0.023063224,0.0064491164,0.025832562,0.0034049596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14953578,0.00079232955,0.001975116,0.0022410492,0.1188868,0.025561256,0.009396664,0.03072223,0.0010195563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036027566,0.000002242118,0.000029966835,0.000015355577,0.0000035011715,0.000028111423,0.000983788,0.00007322572,0.00001762254,0.9956696,0.0019172045,0.0012557887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019292154,0.0000070836363,0.00010789647,0.00017781013,0.000010316542,0.000042292453,0.0005777241,0.00050123,0.00011273557,0.9502365,0.04818822,0.000018848272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013880419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0122605525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0805498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016784428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02175227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42599314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020600404","doi":"","title":"Litigation Funding, Part 2: with Naomi Loewith &amp; Pierre-Jerome Bouchard","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Payment; Government (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Public policy","score_opus":0.03243979181584325,"score_gpt":0.22468680675823402,"score_spread":0.19224701494239077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020600404","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003406517,0.02255019,0.0013161222,0.6829246,0.005467423,0.00017719423,0.0005182075,0.00009970247,0.28353995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044180382,0.011372361,0.0012597622,0.27337113,0.0029845643,0.00020284431,0.00023258553,0.00013837688,0.666258],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938253,0.0005664468,0.00017232062,0.0006767562,0.003120383,0.0016387899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99271,0.0025718429,0.00028842883,0.00019331959,0.002955548,0.0012808904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004216801,0.00065507425,0.0005293725,0.0015407585,0.020156644,0.0122796465,0.0028995369,0.027012298,0.029503474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016819386,0.0006647795,0.0008021902,0.0025677874,0.003970891,0.005313664,0.003239541,0.011367254,0.0038442656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006312755,0.000016278287,0.00053078134,0.00003500889,0.0000049345617,0.00010830505,0.00063765474,0.00009626523,0.000083801395,0.06481332,0.9264027,0.007264651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011433942,0.000008402565,0.0026837855,0.0001841182,0.000012349286,0.000069705406,0.0014892207,0.00022926951,0.00017980818,0.00981197,0.9852865,0.000033570792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75442505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9037159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75442505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035683505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.068386495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49404234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7026785702","doi":"","title":"ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF THE HIGHWAY 25 EXPANSION PROJECT ON AIR QUALITY IN MONTREAL USING GIS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Air pollution; Air quality index; Atmospheric dispersion modeling; Multivariate interpolation; Kriging; Pollutant; Interpolation (computer graphics); Geographic information system","score_opus":0.3169808564471887,"score_gpt":0.5224462212976636,"score_spread":0.2054653648504749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026785702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820494,0.00013365629,0.0017564858,0.00033799096,0.000006215692,0.00017585835,0.0015351729,0.00009099255,0.013914321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952201,0.00015069076,0.002454065,0.000014730471,0.0000023817163,0.000043392192,0.0006518707,0.0000064044643,0.0014563098],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873024,0.00039614618,0.000029658195,0.000061024017,0.00054583367,0.0002370291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858654,0.00035460168,0.00023793551,0.000059064383,0.00055151776,0.00021034695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011834077,0.00052155525,0.0001954023,0.0018113427,0.00077646755,0.0012638001,0.0006619425,0.00024832005,0.0022426397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003013856,0.0001712259,0.00038776785,0.0026353612,0.00077942136,0.0005336104,0.0010122528,0.00028059274,0.0001274353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071156124,0.00039250526,0.6824989,0.00028746328,0.00044252182,0.0018603805,0.002459205,0.19942349,0.009507868,0.007640085,0.0066168914,0.08815923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046248333,0.0005217929,0.92652816,0.000044477263,0.0001487819,0.00007372153,0.0039538043,0.059706528,0.002685623,0.0006050953,0.0056142076,0.000071545204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8783084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9115385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121691585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012818644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007907703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24481648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7044282109","doi":"","title":"Workers’ compensation in Canada, and Colombia: A comparative analysis of non-pecuniary damages","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Compensation (psychology); Indemnity; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.022965877661096225,"score_gpt":0.22868585336443087,"score_spread":0.20571997570333464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7044282109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9420847,0.0144542875,0.00024272373,0.002579658,0.00006622592,0.0001435776,0.00655722,0.00003235353,0.033839088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833398,0.0047479877,0.00021081395,0.00022508716,0.000019079896,0.000024631527,0.0031342723,0.000013170081,0.0082851825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984211,0.00011468828,0.000047329944,0.00011626993,0.00043154965,0.00086899806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99660987,0.0006298298,0.00043401285,0.00008303686,0.0015302261,0.0007130287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008714786,0.0004782526,0.00088227424,0.0044489414,0.0032565473,0.004704178,0.0017648167,0.0010938268,0.00640964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048413184,0.00037797523,0.0008568411,0.009228163,0.0012313625,0.0009443082,0.001375549,0.0012630846,0.00032585528],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014101038,0.00051133026,0.8475027,0.00092448737,0.00074507145,0.0017786692,0.0054842513,0.010442778,0.0009423922,0.027225649,0.030580608,0.07245199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007613839,0.00005198252,0.96532017,0.00018003192,0.0002550082,0.00017406492,0.014053839,0.001984498,0.00027694638,0.0005203214,0.017044332,0.000062593914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99577737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06984274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06984274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043043252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5067469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7065407850","doi":"","title":"Does the Law and Finance Hypothesis Pass the Test of History?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Debt; Statistical hypothesis testing; Term (time)","score_opus":0.028705424559653518,"score_gpt":0.20643406946347737,"score_spread":0.17772864490382384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7065407850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64898753,0.0035224382,0.015009211,0.1632772,0.00281841,0.00009510184,0.0026368487,0.00022665197,0.16342662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98377776,0.000553984,0.000808787,0.0034345547,0.0014071396,0.000035326095,0.0004249603,0.00003721925,0.00952018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99552155,0.0016081095,0.00023315205,0.0009652389,0.00079169736,0.00088021805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87399906,0.09805817,0.011489574,0.0073955236,0.0054360833,0.0036216974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010121946,0.00034267464,0.0016042305,0.0021309745,0.0018954733,0.0030973873,0.0021476266,0.0029011047,0.048265424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.093616396,0.0003243839,0.0012940962,0.0024163658,0.00651398,0.008788799,0.0015212066,0.00300219,0.0032820266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015727069,0.0005597286,0.19447023,0.00039218744,0.0010822894,0.0018655458,0.002162636,0.0015564008,0.0007368806,0.6648112,0.038975164,0.091815025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000999546,0.00079484924,0.20749569,0.00025985786,0.0005523662,0.0008956639,0.0045086853,0.007866041,0.0015442013,0.72514176,0.049824495,0.00011684362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009262594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005418053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048265424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014031323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027643852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16146392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070889566","doi":"","title":"Reasonable Bail or Bail at All Costs? Exploring the Role of Defence Lawyers in Bail Preparations and Negotiations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The Atrium (University of Guelph)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Economic Justice; Power (physics); Work (physics); Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.033209325846512074,"score_gpt":0.21001915506105595,"score_spread":0.17680982921454388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070889566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8765514,0.0018905695,0.0032832543,0.026770348,0.000032794742,0.000097620774,0.000028928396,0.000008014501,0.091337085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99564797,0.0005853656,0.0005762092,0.0006720943,0.000011285174,0.000018124418,0.000008024526,0.0000037990333,0.0024771653],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99068916,0.005997274,0.00020100108,0.00034947591,0.0007311228,0.002031914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96740526,0.024864199,0.004821712,0.00035678476,0.0008273305,0.0017246986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011578099,0.00013979434,0.00029759112,0.0012807193,0.0063557667,0.009460285,0.001029142,0.003299537,0.006797255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034422122,0.00043221825,0.00017729404,0.0014374063,0.011968421,0.007212631,0.0032342486,0.0032934616,0.00040234136],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024796455,0.0004702301,0.06998379,0.00033970238,0.000030795494,0.0025248858,0.4588507,0.0013112547,0.0010461329,0.40260786,0.00561367,0.0569729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009332755,0.00012800601,0.07428747,0.000668211,0.000026127584,0.00040383634,0.7778692,0.002813888,0.0003721645,0.08600417,0.057283048,0.000050423947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034899004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060112253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034899004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014725231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009461984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10683954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093820834","doi":"","title":"Should the Law Preserve Party Control?\\nLitigation Investment, Insurance Law,\\nand Double Standards","year":2015,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Criticism; Autonomy; Control (management); Investment (military); Limiting; Common law; Civil procedure","score_opus":0.05365832085550923,"score_gpt":0.25825551512308126,"score_spread":0.20459719426757203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093820834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042796403,0.013067912,0.028134167,0.24316996,0.0012745166,0.000047578193,0.0000873841,0.00009571554,0.67132634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89637357,0.003747298,0.0029607106,0.027223216,0.0013463738,0.000075272226,0.000039045393,0.000046320438,0.06818819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955136,0.0012649191,0.00011634514,0.0007420332,0.0015944354,0.0007687748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969733,0.001395402,0.00036538742,0.0005599725,0.00048564267,0.00022035374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004499676,0.0002300825,0.00028227025,0.0006724038,0.0035165828,0.007950705,0.0012814691,0.005925399,0.005104185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009819377,0.00021704532,0.00038140515,0.00067738467,0.020081433,0.011164883,0.003355746,0.0066602216,0.0008144171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002118994,0.0000045955335,0.0000887376,0.00000654756,0.0000010421439,0.0000135617365,0.00021949993,0.0000358084,0.00003184476,0.9939526,0.0021764385,0.0034672287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012165353,0.000020788868,0.0006912389,0.00011305953,0.000006341541,0.000066194225,0.0004600979,0.00056018285,0.00031213101,0.9044565,0.09328784,0.000013468643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0084887585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007737764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0084887585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049960273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003969675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036248922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095306171","doi":"","title":"A Methodology for Pricing and Reserving for Claim Expenses in Workers Compensation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deductible; Compensation (psychology); Workers' compensation; Indemnity; Compensation of employees; Remainder; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.15504927422649617,"score_gpt":0.29177497717949236,"score_spread":0.1367257029529962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095306171","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010288898,0.00007572101,0.9975606,0.00007593766,0.000040122686,0.00010609986,0.00004734728,0.00016830147,0.0008969914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028337039,0.00020535721,0.9672519,0.00005919089,0.00016297992,0.0003197346,0.00015382993,0.00017097325,0.003339032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918841,0.0025926835,0.00074269297,0.001219849,0.0032246811,0.00033596772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98813254,0.005999164,0.001329264,0.0020857297,0.002201191,0.00025202206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010381091,0.001290166,0.001327473,0.0041006594,0.0016672504,0.004048833,0.003615201,0.0022120064,0.0066017574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031001361,0.0011263593,0.0025323648,0.003374893,0.0016927335,0.004357559,0.0021498727,0.003197405,0.002073931],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009968099,0.00019741242,0.004506647,0.00024158924,0.00014337413,0.0004553514,0.0005716871,0.10939775,0.006853608,0.503294,0.007838002,0.36640087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005156138,0.00018053538,0.0029844372,0.00011350478,0.00008035335,0.00089839223,0.00016350612,0.6596048,0.0054608257,0.29586414,0.03442922,0.0001686375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037418634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033599825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010381091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023553239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033024584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054901123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099295902","doi":"","title":"An examination of the absence of established moose (Alces alces) populations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Cape; Wetland; Logistic regression; Poaching; Population density; Nova scotia","score_opus":0.06834400829037185,"score_gpt":0.24772913460564114,"score_spread":0.1793851263152693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099295902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992568,0.00003302979,0.000058343514,0.000005474835,6.453377e-7,0.0000054954658,0.00024736908,0.0000013185972,0.00039161692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993074,0.000023061879,0.000109892666,0.0000042317015,7.186853e-7,0.000006305121,0.00023051864,6.2730777e-7,0.00031720323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998066,0.00003316975,0.000014743319,0.00005115031,0.00006148113,0.00003284546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985697,0.00037490667,0.00045330214,0.000068974834,0.00034427512,0.00018880432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037423635,0.00017005602,0.00014559424,0.0007430115,0.0004023174,0.00043054827,0.0003375843,0.00011934658,0.0014867024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014281356,0.00009778615,0.00012971876,0.00041526312,0.0003465847,0.00015114639,0.00027116755,0.00018068303,0.00012750494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029282257,0.00000863514,0.99773407,0.000010373341,0.000017602282,0.0001048333,0.00012884157,0.00007436126,0.0010597889,0.000020075156,0.00003645939,0.0007755749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.012126e-7,0.000015357613,0.9994655,0.0000027758213,0.0000047883145,0.000045843943,0.00011227221,0.00017595144,0.0000894485,0.0000025243764,0.000083971645,8.130006e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17860635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40602586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17860635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072940043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004894534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35513347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099391826","doi":"","title":"Aggression and Dual Diagnosis: Implications for Ontario&amp;apos;s Developmental Services","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aggression; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Service provider; Dual (grammatical number); Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.1639141196900416,"score_gpt":0.2891119876782362,"score_spread":0.1251978679881946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099391826","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36676246,0.006283398,0.00036347538,0.59058714,0.00035741695,0.00006933392,0.00030093218,0.000011164941,0.035264596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97950166,0.0051714843,0.0004740774,0.0097222105,0.00019585257,0.00005330335,0.00006016805,0.00000830306,0.0048129763],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726224,0.0008705963,0.000113913055,0.00009793881,0.00083806954,0.000817255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809909,0.006535833,0.0032174606,0.00017483147,0.0034033752,0.0056775874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048698825,0.00014309044,0.0003137648,0.0011658309,0.008960064,0.0045200344,0.0011861969,0.0016998474,0.0067168884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023081012,0.00023262671,0.00024525978,0.0018603259,0.006285942,0.0019460438,0.003026695,0.002623978,0.0001318955],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013402961,0.00022238422,0.46512318,0.0007541191,0.000036552206,0.0076878197,0.16590086,0.00057973317,0.00048288962,0.094461486,0.15098777,0.11362918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046635287,0.0000617034,0.39257213,0.0020049277,0.000033334905,0.0015516162,0.4528643,0.0011217901,0.00013495242,0.023671627,0.12584162,0.00009532379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9075656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9656872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09243441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061722957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1075841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44783348},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100597387","doi":"","title":"DRAFT Please do not quote without the permission of the authors. The Relationship between Liability Costs and Government Health Spending","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Government (linguistics); Liability; Liability insurance; Casualty insurance; Variety (cybernetics); Permission; Insurance policy","score_opus":0.08774161830497768,"score_gpt":0.26933961715864163,"score_spread":0.18159799885366396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100597387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003307557,0.0009988771,0.0033971167,0.011094863,0.009872428,0.0003525437,0.039129894,0.0010122441,0.93083453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025777522,0.00243023,0.0035017612,0.002259202,0.0010726661,0.0003616847,0.023572873,0.0011832174,0.93984085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912876,0.00012807793,0.0000802412,0.0001192185,0.0004017875,0.00014197663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99281424,0.0018478115,0.00038856824,0.0009713979,0.0037821927,0.00019578691],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010032562,0.000508993,0.00039555313,0.0021446284,0.0012693452,0.0035477018,0.0009011423,0.0010660341,0.48631513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018225348,0.00035408814,0.00055071845,0.0033865373,0.0006885119,0.001992888,0.00094826886,0.0020258327,0.33486387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000219174,0.00001633716,0.0004970673,0.00010003364,0.0000063878474,0.0000450813,0.00023740063,0.000067524896,0.00012802015,0.010893181,0.9710335,0.016953642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007922294,0.0000079423935,0.0021655352,0.00008203696,0.000003743369,0.00004414371,0.0003163671,0.00008608009,0.00025771413,0.001605042,0.99541664,0.000006896123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026531368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034831773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48631513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014727447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018375638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7327091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104286788","doi":"10.71781/1703","title":"La responsabilité civile judiciaire","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Identity (music); Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.00818876223278551,"score_gpt":0.167811708408311,"score_spread":0.1596229461755255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104286788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06949559,0.0111905895,0.036339518,0.040960148,0.0003960413,0.0000939929,0.00034316804,0.000097423355,0.8410836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9085477,0.0048703547,0.0036426059,0.0015124562,0.00026708152,0.00005482585,0.00011250328,0.000035258614,0.080957234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936481,0.002906846,0.00013862022,0.0006954403,0.0015958871,0.0010150763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99391407,0.0024365748,0.00057273026,0.0007236883,0.001551613,0.00080122636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051372787,0.00045743538,0.00046884283,0.0017134203,0.0045612594,0.008025379,0.0012666362,0.002768158,0.016326461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012371649,0.00036854815,0.00040530573,0.0017912467,0.013920662,0.003480299,0.0021540534,0.0034938413,0.0021170217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004268373,0.0000108053655,0.0014126104,0.00002962872,0.000008664522,0.000032713036,0.0013659693,0.00040463745,0.00010030917,0.9845313,0.0033570395,0.008742102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018093608,0.00004745784,0.017349461,0.0005329894,0.000033715354,0.00019230107,0.003711564,0.0029823552,0.00035761515,0.7461641,0.22856772,0.000042630563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2114871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14567675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2114871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014471207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026520897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42051226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111579110","doi":"","title":"Discussion on the Reasonable Probation of Labor Contract","year":2022,"lang":"zh","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Labor relations; Order (exchange); Period (music); Human resources; Labor union; Labor contract; Human resource management; Industrial relations; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.020623533013723876,"score_gpt":0.22732884039188628,"score_spread":0.2067053073781624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111579110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054265056,0.003737184,0.031731773,0.18847552,0.0011226322,0.00023039553,0.00023300556,0.000099390774,0.720105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93812764,0.0012384553,0.0052900375,0.009714463,0.00046364893,0.00034998727,0.000056278386,0.000042100106,0.044717442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98552436,0.0077636037,0.00055966916,0.0018592355,0.0027907316,0.001502386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97879076,0.014977045,0.0014929464,0.00085702946,0.0029669686,0.0009151945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016033284,0.00047883007,0.00059655076,0.0025556353,0.014102053,0.013667251,0.0025827705,0.0065426854,0.014724628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037122976,0.0005137143,0.0009952248,0.002983538,0.027890952,0.019407256,0.0041157533,0.008633434,0.0011161828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027773751,0.0000050032004,0.00016500379,0.000010020835,0.0000017293683,0.000033928867,0.0026286673,0.000116280266,0.000008350657,0.9938101,0.0022271413,0.000991114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024439787,0.000013989823,0.00073562056,0.00013538024,0.000009791706,0.00005562138,0.010639229,0.0010693114,0.00012503896,0.9347775,0.052389275,0.00002472177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040819567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02386663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040819567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015546683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02269777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112799585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117368527","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.18058227","title":"Obligation Closure Constraint (OCC): The First Principle","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Stock (firearms); Empirical research; Obligation; Core (optical fiber); Empirical evidence; Software","score_opus":0.04947190172324918,"score_gpt":0.23501427770260114,"score_spread":0.18554237597935197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117368527","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006186931,0.0014120495,0.49203613,0.02586021,0.0017616095,0.0009940979,0.002302716,0.0015940622,0.46785215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4733129,0.0018810383,0.42627618,0.019268237,0.0032101646,0.0028785693,0.0024538431,0.0018320164,0.06888713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795659,0.006550011,0.0018211444,0.004330934,0.006251164,0.001480741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97256607,0.01506328,0.0011315149,0.0044916067,0.005974416,0.0007730488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019447207,0.001157649,0.0012640035,0.0016965404,0.0051919585,0.007841998,0.0039769644,0.0053640543,0.027265243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04792863,0.0012633957,0.0024392097,0.0014276025,0.011941238,0.017044703,0.0065443814,0.01048303,0.007875145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030187442,0.00002537992,0.00026409636,0.00014722184,0.0000135987875,0.00011049334,0.000552443,0.0005780795,0.00027483478,0.9590203,0.02091005,0.018073311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062457126,0.000042774544,0.0004332933,0.00034850938,0.0000427248,0.00045396187,0.00042491508,0.0052305064,0.0011996424,0.79203373,0.19964632,0.000081111386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011926839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006513773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027265243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038524605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010135874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102847874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124443523","doi":"10.52202/083102-0036","title":"No-Fault Liability Insurance: A Market-Driven Solution for Risk and Investment Stability in Space","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Space (punctuation); Investment (military); Stability (learning theory); Payment","score_opus":0.021582296052436053,"score_gpt":0.22498474184196054,"score_spread":0.2034024457895245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124443523","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13746102,0.0013311352,0.77656627,0.022073366,0.00045683346,0.00009285978,0.00040205749,0.00027124368,0.061345145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969744,0.00038308857,0.014047567,0.0002977383,0.00028132895,0.000037047357,0.000046781006,0.000047265414,0.015115012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994709,0.00016617663,0.000019886375,0.00012627964,0.000101842656,0.00011492476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836165,0.0007536326,0.00030684116,0.00012746242,0.00021471665,0.00023575244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012841217,0.00049683993,0.0010395932,0.0006999026,0.00092034345,0.0028464429,0.0017909023,0.0040734094,0.0073027774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00826313,0.0005713465,0.000799039,0.00041113948,0.0022057279,0.0035313664,0.0016567949,0.0022853361,0.00032647687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031352625,0.00003221321,0.0004126546,0.000034943172,0.000023078479,0.0001616138,0.00009063025,0.09694694,0.0004162635,0.8920382,0.004163594,0.0056484398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024503306,0.000015926735,0.00029278095,0.000011440122,0.000010394736,0.000079676895,0.000047892998,0.36508816,0.00013478029,0.6329129,0.0013654329,0.000016107775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036570968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002904475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073027774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016007676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002116927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024430275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124452366","doi":"10.52202/083103-0068","title":"No-Fault Liability Insurance &amp; Space Sustainability: A Market-Driven Legal Mechanism for Risk Mitigation","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Space (punctuation); Risk management; Mechanism (biology); Liability insurance; Casualty insurance; Indemnity; Risk pool","score_opus":0.011719028772677416,"score_gpt":0.22933286143835224,"score_spread":0.21761383266567483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124452366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1782925,0.0019098027,0.26795867,0.07999187,0.0007402563,0.00023829268,0.000684474,0.0006032866,0.46958077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840634,0.00017585453,0.0038648911,0.0010001078,0.0001833795,0.000028684448,0.00002106877,0.000015995978,0.010646615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981357,0.00058579707,0.0000650011,0.00030421925,0.0005662366,0.00034310058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960615,0.0018134989,0.00085379794,0.0004417107,0.0005922337,0.00023724991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024829935,0.0003275665,0.00040393992,0.0010744531,0.0015425509,0.0048079817,0.0013403408,0.007185548,0.012678008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010404288,0.0003509764,0.0007599417,0.00043600966,0.0047972244,0.0048996666,0.0019577276,0.003304187,0.00065936823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013030818,0.000019618987,0.00037984984,0.0000124104,0.000010308864,0.00006393998,0.000060083927,0.0028456156,0.00030807403,0.9892629,0.0034847993,0.0035394356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030081994,0.000028336386,0.0008399009,0.000029299128,0.000018813722,0.00010507762,0.00010271587,0.020468451,0.00074523024,0.9682736,0.009332615,0.000025962243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004134341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035933533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012678008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002754857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032251687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042412102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7126292577","doi":"","title":"L’indemnisation des dommages découlant d’actes de terrorisme en droit belge","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Digital Access to Libraries","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Vulnerability (computing); Independent state","score_opus":0.042938992657657576,"score_gpt":0.22608203549230266,"score_spread":0.18314304283464508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7126292577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.499388,0.028098932,0.014747755,0.026754119,0.0018127515,0.00015107257,0.0013046708,0.00014667219,0.42759603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90543276,0.0043804767,0.0026075637,0.0015575034,0.0001730287,0.000053097083,0.00036540438,0.00012777599,0.08530232],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99579084,0.001900847,0.00010952005,0.00041671886,0.0010959408,0.0006860767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968388,0.001027986,0.0007558999,0.00023022103,0.00083091954,0.00031615814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030338215,0.00043958722,0.0004062833,0.0032114505,0.004581647,0.0067428914,0.0006981066,0.0011719018,0.010784975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057542524,0.00029098196,0.0003443092,0.0034550484,0.0050304183,0.0022004817,0.0021078936,0.0019278371,0.0014496885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039297037,0.00010864802,0.06166473,0.0014597175,0.00016727844,0.0011512657,0.36661357,0.001430022,0.003414243,0.32210997,0.04514535,0.19634232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013841279,0.000055733246,0.09777219,0.00093776075,0.00005356825,0.0006170341,0.13556199,0.000383108,0.0013281516,0.005414333,0.7577988,0.000063575775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18464498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2640599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18464498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011356294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007417517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36714047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128235568","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v7i2.311","title":"Economic Analysis of Materiality for Canadian Securities Litigation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Materiality (auditing); Misrepresentation; Issuer; Liability; Economic analysis; Valuation (finance); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.0904720653575501,"score_gpt":0.2513350238040156,"score_spread":0.16086295844646553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128235568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3913413,0.019060481,0.019765675,0.03541815,0.0004671649,0.0008833959,0.0029937255,0.00012395489,0.52994615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96988946,0.0073172273,0.002577947,0.00067263265,0.00017287029,0.0001055786,0.00047885173,0.000018195755,0.0187673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98480934,0.0027090958,0.00041397748,0.0006128933,0.0086075645,0.002847142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9714659,0.016073186,0.0031600066,0.00089506496,0.007466437,0.00093927595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009727332,0.00047973052,0.0006941305,0.011821356,0.0056546135,0.008451954,0.0019603483,0.0023820898,0.007733306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045256227,0.00043273953,0.0010860566,0.008584792,0.005143184,0.0024675804,0.0016857521,0.0028851263,0.0002471869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055533867,0.00005273982,0.009795686,0.00014347426,0.000058329908,0.00034243407,0.00061717717,0.015171507,0.00013220013,0.94334155,0.012453271,0.017836053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012787344,0.00023319719,0.19886671,0.0009931951,0.00066438253,0.00060615374,0.0064448225,0.14193542,0.001123615,0.48129854,0.16721827,0.0004878404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89883024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92367923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113522045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.113522045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081780806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82366395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132873233","doi":"","title":"An Economic Analysis of Alternative Business Structures for the Practice of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic analysis; Business practice; Legal practice; Bar (unit)","score_opus":0.03034322172620031,"score_gpt":0.2958314351225705,"score_spread":0.2654882133963702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132873233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3453217,0.004918485,0.166998,0.032301582,0.00028805225,0.00040608723,0.0005633902,0.00013987094,0.4490628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97648776,0.0013896321,0.008249375,0.00023662718,0.00017488076,0.00011386568,0.00006618837,0.000030887604,0.013250735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965333,0.0017725751,0.000082804014,0.00022698719,0.0008069243,0.00057730736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98724514,0.008961936,0.0011684288,0.0008097053,0.0009808915,0.0008339418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00420882,0.00039488135,0.0006755862,0.0019219081,0.0021877654,0.0074232803,0.0014306797,0.0032003513,0.020558955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020717226,0.0005752542,0.0010390651,0.0020185902,0.008114236,0.008997815,0.0023163743,0.002891966,0.0010145936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021738639,0.000030229765,0.00040478254,0.000014371391,0.0000047651865,0.000022888584,0.00009524731,0.0054169246,0.000037275062,0.9905799,0.00082786754,0.0025440482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039993487,0.000045676523,0.0018262727,0.00004000985,0.000016054684,0.00003128491,0.0006410676,0.05684236,0.00006294007,0.9334128,0.0070248316,0.000016721573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008939982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012279201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020558955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009239593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00550947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06877655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132992627","doi":"","title":"The effect of expedited, tripartite, and conventional arbitration on arbitration outcomes","year":2002,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Compulsory arbitration; Grievance; Dispute resolution; Federal Arbitration Act; Christian ministry","score_opus":0.02327919207643734,"score_gpt":0.2731757305378269,"score_spread":0.24989653846138957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132992627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9698776,0.0011886593,0.0040041893,0.0016185448,0.00013267632,0.00041059733,0.0002187717,0.000057544385,0.022491314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99671257,0.00019773828,0.0008175937,0.00017207165,0.000043023865,0.00022216055,0.00009926675,0.000021175138,0.0017144307],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9146169,0.058700904,0.0036587373,0.003962663,0.012233709,0.0068271086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5064187,0.4033041,0.058598965,0.011687356,0.009616059,0.010374688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07998374,0.0006396159,0.0013321616,0.001579415,0.0015951032,0.0051786737,0.0021863761,0.0018029526,0.012476033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31562677,0.00035067604,0.0018453406,0.002386862,0.0042545,0.006197323,0.005845101,0.005486836,0.0012443069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.059156418,0.008437144,0.60857326,0.0010136581,0.0028699022,0.0007913489,0.0065855654,0.016912695,0.0014849302,0.052852985,0.004912112,0.23640992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004042762,0.020220382,0.8048224,0.0006612958,0.0016233354,0.00061992963,0.008591736,0.028430115,0.0023822626,0.1190147,0.009277903,0.00031328245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020992355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027472263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07998374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026120387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035762696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4229995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134515345","doi":"","title":"Security for others","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Poison control; Legal action","score_opus":0.04348919595716358,"score_gpt":0.24464511512738527,"score_spread":0.2011559191702217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134515345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009901293,0.001722507,0.0011862237,0.02537595,0.0028674398,0.000059983606,0.00033304654,0.0002239519,0.96724075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02172501,0.0019199203,0.0005586978,0.011423807,0.0009033524,0.0001257152,0.00043741651,0.00022835229,0.9626777],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958591,0.0010393137,0.00018578355,0.00077253615,0.0010949064,0.0010483501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950676,0.0005894421,0.0003693959,0.0013003349,0.0012785348,0.0013947198],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002866105,0.0011103336,0.00059547374,0.001331308,0.0067077894,0.012964137,0.0013764093,0.004506439,0.32517865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011487208,0.00039026295,0.000719461,0.0013430684,0.0033537643,0.009947317,0.011036463,0.006361813,0.21164893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002610764,0.000021641765,0.0005307555,0.00011251401,0.000008796387,0.00012773141,0.0016233306,0.000051135194,0.00017211285,0.22073463,0.7134905,0.0631008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018148636,0.000004999042,0.000147443,0.00008243927,0.0000013733687,0.00006375542,0.00027726096,0.000019402516,0.000032584023,0.0051582144,0.99420655,0.0000041421986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004926677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063110474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32517865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034372397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076253046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96255076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135578240","doi":"","title":"The illicit monopoly figure: systematic location and constitutional issues","year":2004,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Constitution; Legislature","score_opus":0.038023327792771504,"score_gpt":0.24231991368609987,"score_spread":0.20429658589332836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135578240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4640334,0.0029157775,0.13525711,0.03288358,0.00025687195,0.00023886366,0.0015048163,0.00023589433,0.36267373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915336,0.00021202798,0.0022705593,0.00046842595,0.00007634485,0.00004730781,0.00006145572,0.000039000166,0.005291323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99122614,0.003536773,0.00053930836,0.0023541288,0.0013134035,0.0010303154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9420996,0.03865421,0.005226115,0.0091444785,0.0039881486,0.00088749314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009423947,0.00019987275,0.001116904,0.0025810415,0.004205855,0.011182549,0.0021734373,0.005399943,0.016513843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065365456,0.00067274255,0.0004557603,0.004009739,0.013915151,0.01308156,0.0033791843,0.0038680015,0.001043722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004285422,0.000012921141,0.002181998,0.000040378047,0.000012982975,0.000059095637,0.0011399116,0.0003757354,0.00018626124,0.98634547,0.0015750115,0.008027359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052333206,0.000038481587,0.0054918085,0.00013572622,0.00007636289,0.00019463402,0.0029074892,0.0026317,0.0013878046,0.96667093,0.020367222,0.00004554443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00469187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060097533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016513843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003977074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002886814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055244327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162026390","doi":"10.82308/2950","title":"Workers’ compensation in Canada, and Colombia: A comparative analysis of non-pecuniary damages","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Damages; Scheme (mathematics); Workers' compensation; Dual (grammatical number); Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.022774885603955485,"score_gpt":0.23781037542714065,"score_spread":0.21503548982318516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162026390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8946866,0.014807044,0.0005410257,0.0038080092,0.000088143905,0.00017445289,0.006235449,0.00003540651,0.07962399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98715484,0.004235599,0.00025773692,0.00020079271,0.000011529472,0.000024693816,0.0017019919,0.0000093370645,0.006403498],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851745,0.00008691051,0.000040429324,0.00010250615,0.00050871057,0.00074385846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784696,0.00039250008,0.0003141399,0.0000602086,0.000979364,0.00040683596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006459561,0.00043751203,0.00064397126,0.0037153456,0.003403476,0.0046709473,0.0011397484,0.00081939274,0.0050838343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039077196,0.0002855536,0.0006044852,0.0075564976,0.0014580624,0.00086694286,0.0013218416,0.0008208577,0.00021323473],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012577932,0.00049970776,0.60190225,0.0016923599,0.0006347869,0.0026469592,0.012037093,0.029512784,0.0013933991,0.15559942,0.06410043,0.12872298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012961956,0.000095903975,0.8877438,0.0004559152,0.00028267427,0.00031000402,0.031397536,0.00845907,0.0003322049,0.002651821,0.06799277,0.00014860784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10287864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10287864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049338732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7464403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7165457678","doi":"10.82308/55765","title":"The role of judges in delaying timely access to civil justice: Analysis and proposal for reform","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vlaamse regering","keywords":"Adversarial system; Legislature; Adjudication; Economic Justice; Judicial reform; Judicial review; Privilege (computing); Court of record; Civil procedure","score_opus":0.03657252123206726,"score_gpt":0.3035345471581695,"score_spread":0.26696202592610224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7165457678","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053610384,0.023071516,0.04131215,0.6092329,0.0026682683,0.00085057615,0.000097155615,0.00010433789,0.26905283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8937873,0.014963972,0.02172105,0.032939512,0.003134091,0.0009167868,0.00005190504,0.00005176949,0.032433543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98482186,0.007988262,0.0005071151,0.0013668796,0.0018858007,0.0034300974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9569049,0.030394161,0.0035591098,0.0016269466,0.0052671963,0.002247725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022596404,0.0006320532,0.0011253967,0.003108627,0.0100254,0.019230777,0.0042998637,0.010279934,0.006917648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034460958,0.0007407548,0.0013822109,0.0027791944,0.027539164,0.018535648,0.0063403095,0.009346425,0.00071409333],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010284584,0.000050822036,0.00038200407,0.00006722976,0.000004536562,0.0000843551,0.0011048702,0.00037425983,0.000033702046,0.99147624,0.0031160312,0.0032956717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081493046,0.00008823078,0.0017630555,0.0006489263,0.000052656826,0.0001158286,0.013523928,0.0046677645,0.00026200243,0.9108165,0.06791861,0.000060923234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03053592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03792694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03053592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029546008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048114955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21437228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W760564206","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2824","title":"Book Review: Contract Law and Contract Practice: Bridging the Gap between Legal Reasoning and Commercial Expectation, by Catherine Mitchell","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Law; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.030217183623526593,"score_gpt":0.25719089012568286,"score_spread":0.22697370650215626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W760564206","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000099104574,0.8686334,0.00041564673,0.08325174,0.03357552,0.000021319664,0.00026829526,0.000033663564,0.013701288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029446178,0.8208733,0.0006156099,0.04594178,0.07069189,0.00008982658,0.00048071487,0.000085182626,0.05827709],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985329,0.0003245128,0.00010109122,0.00019660147,0.0007598765,0.00008505779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876595,0.0075028897,0.00062231545,0.0002087217,0.003401866,0.0006047095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014913135,0.0010567332,0.0018115435,0.0046337806,0.0010513625,0.004738741,0.0017069873,0.005333774,0.024264375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014610418,0.0007508937,0.0006038518,0.01048301,0.0021269834,0.004540022,0.0012514455,0.0057677124,0.0113407485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036364447,0.0000051731936,0.000031025076,0.00027854403,0.000004054759,0.0000064114233,0.0000098859,0.000037576843,0.000009787681,0.0014572814,0.9838148,0.014341773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015311893,0.000010315675,0.00046010522,0.0016623224,0.000014273329,0.00009434027,0.00004021973,0.000075610675,0.000019524181,0.0042988625,0.9932973,0.000011710705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016583804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03831137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024264375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004299686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007654279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08117241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W76213128","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2016.2442","title":"Contract Structure for Joint Production: Risk and Ambiguity Under Compensatory Damages","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Management Science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Deliverable; Damages; Production (economics); Microeconomics; Economics; Business; Comparative statics; Dual (grammatical number); Actuarial science; Industrial organization; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.032619992154127433,"score_gpt":0.22215326604589133,"score_spread":0.1895332738917639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W76213128","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18434063,0.00091243634,0.6853557,0.009730705,0.00013446485,0.0005376133,0.00056323013,0.00017604887,0.11824911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.953313,0.00048070235,0.02476767,0.00026862856,0.0001025183,0.0003727268,0.00011236659,0.000041315132,0.020541146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928149,0.0034965214,0.0002871008,0.00085008785,0.0014143811,0.0011369651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821446,0.011278993,0.0027883262,0.0013578025,0.0009925572,0.0014377323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009440783,0.0012928859,0.0015840634,0.0012796317,0.0021996265,0.006523958,0.0031991377,0.0066353427,0.012411814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025925186,0.0012610524,0.001994742,0.0011137346,0.0060584694,0.009585941,0.0042504254,0.0062962775,0.001052396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007268136,0.00008203667,0.0006790459,0.00003870469,0.000020958558,0.0003979421,0.00031350335,0.1503278,0.00034038583,0.8427754,0.0007109099,0.0042405115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010868156,0.000112158865,0.00044194376,0.000042257867,0.000027843114,0.0001887406,0.00015528088,0.25805336,0.00019076299,0.7377126,0.0029154175,0.000050971405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005471132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003151388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012411814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060617006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045270906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04992819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W780536405","doi":"","title":"Canadian Anti-Corruption Law and Compliance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business law international","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign Corrupt Practices Act; Legislation; Language change; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Political corruption; Money laundering; Public administration; Politics; Enforcement","score_opus":0.03523145449432327,"score_gpt":0.22067347943981683,"score_spread":0.18544202494549356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W780536405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002632831,0.023436207,0.0008059812,0.0866218,0.0021481942,0.000064987275,0.00041314986,0.00012473683,0.88375205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22628632,0.03661274,0.003533731,0.052599292,0.0010966356,0.00015510156,0.0007092342,0.0002385729,0.67876834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98539215,0.001026307,0.00030163868,0.0009563165,0.009728508,0.0025950691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930206,0.00066497555,0.0002718473,0.00028955,0.0049890983,0.00076400087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003407603,0.0006661288,0.00048676252,0.0027400232,0.020854633,0.011246856,0.0018238262,0.005870966,0.018712567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011521659,0.00054089195,0.0004295484,0.004761665,0.014345361,0.0029539876,0.0029999116,0.005162953,0.0025225384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007659466,0.000013820621,0.00055392936,0.00008594798,0.00000407438,0.00010708596,0.0029363222,0.00015614771,0.000067300876,0.53035676,0.43505073,0.030660117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033408546,0.0000032301098,0.001629924,0.00018859546,0.0000031849545,0.000041814863,0.0008933666,0.00008131489,0.000042138163,0.0077187796,0.98937154,0.000022644073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98797995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9880806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13053378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13053378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2562152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9470933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W892658142","doi":"10.71781/2366","title":"Le devoir de coopération durant l'exécution du contrat","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03568857750225912,"score_gpt":0.237347214316877,"score_spread":0.20165863681461788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W892658142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112174325,0.0026322594,0.050375305,0.018658604,0.00045825404,0.00021365247,0.00019823798,0.00013466335,0.8151546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8366254,0.000810757,0.009892356,0.0016763619,0.000094443174,0.00016989173,0.00012258637,0.000084325286,0.15052377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98469526,0.0032480718,0.00048639742,0.00207806,0.0059363195,0.003555893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852533,0.003210713,0.001610171,0.00165921,0.0063486933,0.0019179183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007739463,0.0007078585,0.00047493805,0.0012124701,0.010806968,0.008675096,0.0018409386,0.0047883135,0.0119450595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012240133,0.00059025345,0.0008391692,0.00111465,0.015960926,0.0049557276,0.005833945,0.0045033535,0.001525458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036558307,0.00001771716,0.0020717017,0.000060139584,0.000013428058,0.00025340027,0.011487243,0.0004940552,0.0007825961,0.97122663,0.0026995407,0.010856918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052862335,0.00014372106,0.015636167,0.00090357714,0.00008645425,0.0006678951,0.020935426,0.002431335,0.0028626686,0.22237627,0.7337559,0.00014769063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39501157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5256757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39501157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030941198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06918148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7854247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W90446140","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1338","title":"Book Notes: Laws Quandary, by Steven D. Smith","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.022500589049909314,"score_gpt":0.2149443487570297,"score_spread":0.19244375970712038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W90446140","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00090048404,0.099019736,0.0029327814,0.2033145,0.014532594,0.00005509687,0.0017273535,0.00033363284,0.6771838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008304377,0.032518856,0.0012525716,0.0143463835,0.004510258,0.000046841502,0.00049149344,0.00014714748,0.93838215],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965155,0.000065261986,0.000020275902,0.000053213244,0.00018386455,0.000025804788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986527,0.000546313,0.00009027323,0.0000788572,0.0005368301,0.00009506362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006222545,0.000475212,0.00030976353,0.0016091794,0.0020994593,0.0026680266,0.00046960905,0.0019639987,0.09326164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035619927,0.00043246555,0.00023082782,0.002135141,0.0015988788,0.0037471168,0.0007129843,0.0032353972,0.03187299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021101985,0.0000035073726,0.000041984982,0.000013927324,4.610431e-7,0.0000054266807,0.000045811976,0.000027427706,0.000014923865,0.0131186005,0.97548234,0.011243535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014586168,0.0000024024203,0.00026331883,0.00007671951,0.0000011214521,0.000017196942,0.0000742601,0.000036482987,0.000034936565,0.008654225,0.9908352,0.0000026380694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031213058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062328096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09326164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024372588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002992755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3119912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W954341198","doi":"10.5305/procannmeetasil.106.0508","title":"Transnational Conservation Contracts: A Primer","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Primer (cosmetics); Business; Chemistry","score_opus":0.023445016745809302,"score_gpt":0.21310110366377555,"score_spread":0.18965608691796626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W954341198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00615528,0.06668917,0.059390355,0.0705679,0.0013829299,0.00013007,0.0002842749,0.00009092628,0.7953092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50694025,0.14457026,0.06985249,0.027904773,0.0018816,0.0009092851,0.0005833349,0.00033626484,0.24702175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838173,0.00076739164,0.00009126416,0.0001980035,0.00039538776,0.00016622887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982646,0.0010469132,0.000116969226,0.00021597724,0.00024799822,0.00010752797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003518326,0.00041887874,0.00045762295,0.0020073557,0.002210199,0.006320354,0.0013845835,0.006026623,0.020564286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037926896,0.00051315856,0.0005055057,0.004967274,0.0057793395,0.013692053,0.0027315111,0.006448744,0.0017840016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013808291,0.0000075854405,0.00004635748,0.00002305657,0.000001015456,0.000023867202,0.00030917383,0.00013793565,0.000020252779,0.9893758,0.0035923144,0.006461234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003729026,0.000013180199,0.00028160383,0.0006264709,0.0000028848924,0.00030292867,0.0011374119,0.0008583548,0.00008950799,0.5089755,0.48769906,0.000009317486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072860415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008257364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020564286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053473227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004201001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06879437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}