{"meta":{"query_hash":"54a474e73a36","filters":{"topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms"},"cohort_total":325,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":325,"exported":325,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/54a474e73a36","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Law%2C+Rights%2C+and+Freedoms"},"results":[{"id":"W118201152","doi":"","title":"Balance of Privacy vs. Security: A Historical Perspective of the USA PATRIOT Act","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rutgers computer & technology law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patriot Act; National security; Law; Legislation; Political science; Information privacy; Terrorism; Business; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.010536900195893251,"score_gpt":0.25522731378729446,"score_spread":0.2446904135914012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W118201152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06634725,0.19877017,0.005121187,0.09632397,0.0023608094,0.000055474655,0.00041635448,0.00003398188,0.63057077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83221835,0.11908521,0.0019415393,0.0131926825,0.0031843474,0.000111755675,0.0001968526,0.00004939328,0.03001979],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772006,0.001212147,0.00009969551,0.00028303056,0.00043486737,0.00025019317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709713,0.0019012488,0.0003694204,0.00008028389,0.00041256612,0.00013938382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015555604,0.00039148456,0.00019883,0.0031514422,0.0032018942,0.006056402,0.00047527338,0.0028757642,0.0028002744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033576984,0.00024791292,0.00024235944,0.0040731677,0.011039815,0.006590659,0.0015992898,0.0039614327,0.00041487065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019002073,0.000021901164,0.0022987328,0.00011905021,0.00000685926,0.0002327691,0.011642318,0.00023173606,0.00012161286,0.9287686,0.019656196,0.036881294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004145789,0.00006249477,0.014562411,0.0016822062,0.000010428348,0.00052464445,0.014127962,0.000539057,0.00034348335,0.09264509,0.8754589,0.000039111063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0135585265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014923157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0135585265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007866719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022955243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05707735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1465973039","doi":"10.1089/elj.2012.1128","title":"A Study of Interest Groups and Campaign Finance Reform in the United States and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Political science; Election law; Politics; Interest group; Download; Public administration; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.02988166507463274,"score_gpt":0.29895318967797346,"score_spread":0.2690715246033407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1465973039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95595324,0.00083507784,0.00008271909,0.008567895,0.000034272656,0.00009267252,0.00032754618,0.00000829801,0.03409837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892757,0.00039464064,0.00006472099,0.0008726397,0.000011701818,0.000021089341,0.00015895776,0.000006598325,0.009193903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99529195,0.00054714276,0.000076835844,0.00023816452,0.0010363762,0.002809484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911265,0.0021046395,0.00085975515,0.00021435559,0.0026960487,0.0029986377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027279905,0.00020777174,0.0006954037,0.0031826242,0.018869933,0.0076515493,0.0021174578,0.0023866678,0.00646439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012732618,0.00036883148,0.0004856914,0.007874631,0.005837395,0.0019080533,0.0026567196,0.0039174277,0.00027157998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006817165,0.0016461676,0.6359117,0.00015408057,0.00019152735,0.00092964224,0.1176768,0.002069267,0.0007032864,0.14644675,0.031744648,0.061844453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001425572,0.00011095147,0.71087277,0.00011021305,0.0001601466,0.000061748964,0.20949827,0.0018291156,0.00043213487,0.00248991,0.0742199,0.0000722668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99775994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99890566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16618675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16618675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21147761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9671052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W147114429","doi":"","title":"The Scope of Tolerance: Studies on the Costs of Free Expression and Freedom of the Press","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incitement; Scope (computer science); Freedom of expression; Table of contents; Free press; Index (typography); Table (database); Political science; Freedom of the press; Expression (computer science); Free speech; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.02448660563499163,"score_gpt":0.3007121085294625,"score_spread":0.2762255028944709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W147114429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047098782,0.027138963,0.004692827,0.014048365,0.00024851869,0.00006617643,0.0003835666,0.000023510443,0.90629923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9590078,0.015130528,0.00092438544,0.0011960446,0.000508843,0.00016307077,0.00017854976,0.00005194395,0.022838775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920244,0.004116034,0.0002825262,0.00037495166,0.0026562067,0.0005458439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9180171,0.07135207,0.004473215,0.0026722467,0.0026191717,0.000866256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006112877,0.0003663897,0.00041346683,0.0039587826,0.0022733558,0.009231599,0.0012702389,0.0015328425,0.034959406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053900637,0.0002760468,0.00046306528,0.006328751,0.009910197,0.014429531,0.0033195284,0.0023194498,0.001409373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042084856,0.000044123102,0.0030757394,0.00017712539,0.00001527813,0.000059641367,0.0025546006,0.00052072,0.00003478432,0.9650222,0.007160579,0.02129317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003469748,0.00008724202,0.025097545,0.0018988488,0.0000640166,0.00046283123,0.013752658,0.0013547476,0.00029285313,0.8240272,0.13288152,0.000045809717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002684586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002686296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034959406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004166268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021749032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11695087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W147118177","doi":"","title":"25 Years to Freedom: An Interview with Betty Tyson","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women’s Studies Quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; White (mutation); Conviction; Acquittal; Law; Criminology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sociology; Art; History; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03598053947546718,"score_gpt":0.31005712247161143,"score_spread":0.27407658299614424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W147118177","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20977665,0.028037002,0.0003783552,0.67783886,0.010590857,0.00019866589,0.00028056622,0.00008755328,0.072811425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5336712,0.019733803,0.00071203185,0.3528989,0.0020865346,0.0005114553,0.00021391494,0.00026003324,0.08991206],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.994273,0.0020606732,0.00016204448,0.00043437124,0.0010078588,0.0020620083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911965,0.0014262021,0.0005501079,0.00013120414,0.0008742644,0.005821658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004213981,0.0008616561,0.0012619524,0.0017131404,0.039968327,0.0076435157,0.002740328,0.007710956,0.012190142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010491329,0.0015513875,0.0005196802,0.001908901,0.009658637,0.0075535225,0.008711611,0.025406843,0.0014455864],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000469762,0.00021211902,0.0064037936,0.00014069864,0.000022536162,0.0071367705,0.543917,0.00006217374,0.0005877648,0.005815518,0.42477167,0.010883014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000099751815,0.000056612284,0.00392777,0.00050363416,0.000008777439,0.002804114,0.6705825,0.00006131846,0.00008857606,0.00068746053,0.32120278,0.000066442415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22221152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32168287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22221152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011508013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014500778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44183624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484541927","doi":"","title":"The Constitutional and Cultural Underpinnings of Freedom of Expression: Lessons from the United States and Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Freedom of expression; Political science; Normative; Interpretation (philosophy); Expression (computer science); Law; Politics; Fundamental rights; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010323190371069097,"score_gpt":0.2465594596742068,"score_spread":0.2362362693031377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484541927","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1914287,0.017142974,0.0015538522,0.12290769,0.00041663364,0.00006862131,0.00026457172,0.000025094902,0.66619194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669379,0.008630444,0.00080803694,0.006766352,0.000057648358,0.000033854678,0.00008468243,0.000028705057,0.016652338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947354,0.0009606166,0.00012363704,0.00034518805,0.001440557,0.0023945884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99265456,0.002972955,0.0002372916,0.0002530211,0.0025768278,0.0013053367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035759043,0.00036156713,0.0008387895,0.0017663521,0.027882887,0.01324089,0.0022175256,0.0036127248,0.0042302515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010649365,0.00030217896,0.00053169637,0.004629454,0.028361736,0.0044815294,0.005890865,0.0066676904,0.00020348227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004452373,0.000028341574,0.003199977,0.000048692436,0.000016644062,0.00043151435,0.043978557,0.00066821056,0.00007354288,0.9225419,0.010978213,0.017989807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010065769,0.000035605804,0.024556544,0.0015378561,0.00011903991,0.00033578143,0.2308604,0.0019468885,0.0004754937,0.3271386,0.41266727,0.00022579271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99613994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14175107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14175107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17515086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487519162","doi":"","title":"Burning Crosses on Campus: University Hate Speech Codes.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University; University and College Union","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Dignity; Law; Censorship; Marketplace of ideas; Jurisprudence; Political science; Sociology; First amendment","score_opus":0.01382374773548006,"score_gpt":0.2623641808930041,"score_spread":0.24854043315752405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487519162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075761236,0.03549626,0.008658146,0.19122067,0.0054125767,0.00006682964,0.0005457237,0.00031514533,0.6825234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76332486,0.012440067,0.0020782042,0.0407449,0.0034344438,0.00020445694,0.00036615937,0.00017503665,0.17723197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693406,0.001293238,0.0001342362,0.00029161014,0.0006924555,0.0006542465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895231,0.006943021,0.00087397447,0.0005634998,0.0010543673,0.0010421232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034747997,0.00049114967,0.00022852758,0.0016334156,0.010688437,0.01170568,0.0011479706,0.008966591,0.009492749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0135894995,0.00039480196,0.00038070677,0.0013916853,0.008661116,0.010059636,0.004667926,0.007055168,0.002223717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033986355,0.000044369026,0.002086019,0.00007503282,0.0000041267617,0.0004382078,0.02159567,0.00013056264,0.00017212945,0.7893713,0.14786825,0.038180325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001681354,0.00003909459,0.009217586,0.0006797004,0.000021699507,0.0006569268,0.047776673,0.0011925657,0.0009806223,0.1254561,0.8138632,0.000099066536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015279786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02698785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015279786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005456086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004102017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0395869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489579544","doi":"","title":"Efficacy or Justice? Overturning the Ban","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Military review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Conversation; Sociology; Officer; Economic Justice; Framing (construction); National security; Political science; History","score_opus":0.040781832843185366,"score_gpt":0.3419331614135393,"score_spread":0.3011513285703539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489579544","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0074813855,0.0069530476,0.0019682546,0.57831305,0.007211392,0.000021685826,0.000030135652,0.00004122246,0.3979798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49651882,0.004866237,0.00082523475,0.35963878,0.007662118,0.0000901136,0.00003806556,0.00017034977,0.13019036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98935646,0.0045892075,0.00029764237,0.0012321454,0.0026794022,0.0018451723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906652,0.0059923953,0.0004579856,0.000784564,0.0011928631,0.0009070273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010823967,0.00045817508,0.00057799066,0.00069889345,0.008832803,0.010119902,0.0013616619,0.0087283375,0.012314947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024849862,0.00032991552,0.00036976638,0.0005262568,0.03729748,0.012968764,0.0059776716,0.019931253,0.002667959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014488078,0.000024481447,0.00016859078,0.00003488067,0.0000027679366,0.000046283258,0.0057959994,0.00002241921,0.00009318452,0.90759987,0.07486135,0.011335648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028379867,0.00004467561,0.0010626918,0.0005104098,0.000013473143,0.00007798211,0.010523069,0.00012642003,0.0004504961,0.28330684,0.70382214,0.000033415938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01157098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014359844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012314947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006215985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055613187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057243288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490218139","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1121932","title":"Not Dead, Just Sleeping: Canada's Prohibition on Blasphemous Libel as a Case Study in Obsolete Legislation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.028646187636546326,"score_gpt":0.2772757971765659,"score_spread":0.24862960954001959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490218139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63173974,0.0028217277,0.0012965576,0.07665778,0.0004257371,0.00010908613,0.00025347774,0.000054490214,0.28664145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9254939,0.0011463246,0.0006334232,0.014106645,0.000055273555,0.000038404774,0.00005878354,0.000064017266,0.05840324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933589,0.0011750072,0.000088095214,0.00042785658,0.0015176206,0.0034324976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933015,0.0035165518,0.0003626847,0.00023992785,0.0012509049,0.0013283838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039334116,0.00048336806,0.0005920375,0.0016056783,0.0610356,0.010278425,0.0038448335,0.0152442185,0.005881033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00953796,0.000632148,0.00057595177,0.004157116,0.022043245,0.0028996968,0.0043696286,0.016576838,0.00033243437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001485193,0.00036391083,0.0291081,0.00019622878,0.000051648123,0.015873274,0.27577093,0.0012012599,0.0009272008,0.54685587,0.09399963,0.0355035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010084115,0.000096647724,0.03653976,0.0007928496,0.0001296369,0.0029117072,0.5120431,0.0015929769,0.0014730969,0.017036201,0.42704993,0.00023318261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9857238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07243509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07243509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14484817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52555585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493222896","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1150","title":"R. v. Bryan: The Supreme Court and the Electoral Process","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Jurisprudence; Politics; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Deference; Sociology","score_opus":0.03979678197495684,"score_gpt":0.3035857516961738,"score_spread":0.26378896972121696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493222896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04034947,0.07014452,0.004983902,0.2348508,0.001391222,0.00008498439,0.00035091199,0.00007771106,0.64776653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8200216,0.022246502,0.0020378425,0.072098024,0.0012884869,0.0000745511,0.00014209756,0.00006624619,0.08202468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918795,0.0017061533,0.00016233585,0.00064425205,0.0029912582,0.0026164297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966185,0.0016522881,0.00023862255,0.00010730398,0.00088923145,0.0004938648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005270641,0.0002867275,0.0004725978,0.001762066,0.020379994,0.012451588,0.002123145,0.008324934,0.004226531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0089263385,0.00043589206,0.0004940216,0.0031613219,0.017433686,0.002937839,0.0024582515,0.009886668,0.00045422956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049009886,0.00000478065,0.00039971955,0.000016715687,0.0000037100954,0.00011223575,0.0013811969,0.00011979951,0.000058689082,0.97702026,0.016265618,0.00461232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004838295,0.000029525769,0.009375233,0.0006003409,0.000048256916,0.00022746452,0.0045852466,0.0009124328,0.00042612603,0.3071111,0.6765114,0.00012450365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9430671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96303445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065566294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065566294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08832148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47571898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493230811","doi":"","title":"Empirical Shortcomings with First Amendment Jurisprudence: A Historical Perspective on the Power of Hate Speech","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persecution; Supreme court; Oppression; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Due Process Clause; Harm; Prejudice (legal term); Humiliation; Racism; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.021073400052362367,"score_gpt":0.28561298214092856,"score_spread":0.2645395820885662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493230811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04976079,0.106893495,0.028110974,0.29147083,0.0036207866,0.00006393119,0.00009626183,0.00008419776,0.5198988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9108621,0.026527409,0.006721869,0.03549255,0.005405396,0.00012861601,0.00006153345,0.000098180055,0.014702348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753652,0.015032227,0.00095229334,0.002807257,0.004434137,0.0014088077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89813936,0.087191015,0.004352127,0.0037280144,0.0058762548,0.0007132486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032626756,0.0006400586,0.00086444797,0.005195945,0.0128765125,0.019309726,0.0036905871,0.014289977,0.002782831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06036988,0.0007597943,0.00092854886,0.003731268,0.084570654,0.0223924,0.0060556275,0.022703238,0.00056660885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037273844,0.000008804483,0.00018197586,0.000030776708,0.0000025373504,0.000067149085,0.004233114,0.00007702852,0.000024112405,0.99168795,0.0009668256,0.0027161038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015177841,0.00005916438,0.0011680909,0.0015179289,0.000019005405,0.00039870586,0.011052777,0.0009100099,0.00066041393,0.7357667,0.24834879,0.0000832033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010490928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077023753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032626756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011217375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006718819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17254889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497381870","doi":"","title":"Reaction and resistance : feminism, law, and social change","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Sociology; Gender studies; Resistance (ecology); Heteronormativity; Law; Political science; Human sexuality","score_opus":0.0455998071082363,"score_gpt":0.3032524608231148,"score_spread":0.2576526537148785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497381870","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049050093,0.048661973,0.005789412,0.5257474,0.0036288502,0.000115743474,0.00003926577,0.00012492042,0.36684227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89505476,0.0168846,0.0012979887,0.040651783,0.0024969545,0.00024042364,0.000029042596,0.00015704683,0.0431874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772609,0.018020619,0.00025080796,0.0009697753,0.0017115258,0.0017864801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850152,0.012234966,0.0010161215,0.0005548419,0.00046170224,0.00071707374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015919242,0.00083072076,0.00076547207,0.002298769,0.011257886,0.021749698,0.0022966724,0.007990753,0.0072608865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016495422,0.00044250398,0.00054501864,0.0025015993,0.083911896,0.016111512,0.010364068,0.008792413,0.00059997773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029732755,0.000082402956,0.0007374805,0.00018871509,0.000013830286,0.00033213935,0.1725375,0.00023046412,0.00016655127,0.77138865,0.028018227,0.026274301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000291943,0.000060643968,0.0015619044,0.00084646314,0.000010612753,0.00030237867,0.19122487,0.00038860898,0.00035696695,0.3490043,0.4561628,0.00005114103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004630698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032188059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021749698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008801581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048156767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08419001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516564762","doi":"","title":"Feminism, Democracy and the Right to Privacy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Feminism; Democracy; Political science; Right to privacy; Sociology; Internet privacy; Gender studies; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.025986246764368406,"score_gpt":0.30944934690038706,"score_spread":0.28346310013601866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516564762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013181443,0.022366852,0.008653758,0.17146888,0.0007353617,0.000026822434,0.00010968708,0.00003256158,0.78342456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8620849,0.013612541,0.0030943907,0.02309198,0.0012437525,0.00010193504,0.00007919381,0.00007661751,0.09661468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950513,0.0032587568,0.000091181195,0.00040178344,0.00064071035,0.00055622583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960246,0.0029879322,0.0002684797,0.00027501822,0.00022699664,0.00021696372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036831987,0.00033070587,0.00032289178,0.00068046513,0.005479659,0.0054313615,0.0005198873,0.0035253009,0.008523218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005760473,0.00019034454,0.00025961676,0.0009153809,0.033629097,0.00546275,0.0035820277,0.0043544136,0.0009858824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033152685,0.0000026970608,0.000069785216,0.0000158697,8.097149e-7,0.000030232206,0.0015967044,0.000052163883,0.000020391642,0.992378,0.003128271,0.0027016292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075122043,0.0000060627644,0.0002239963,0.00013879772,0.0000017106292,0.00012940887,0.0017344465,0.00007553444,0.00011398258,0.74656445,0.25099838,0.000005790992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044788583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037956454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008523218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043362137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002758867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031461537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516910803","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1040","title":"Should the Left Hand Get What the Right Hand's Got?: Government Information Sharing, Criminal Investigation, and Privacy Rights","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Law; Right to privacy; Political science; Brother; Variety (cybernetics); Constitutional right; The Right to Privacy; Human rights; Computer science","score_opus":0.038180528517461516,"score_gpt":0.2823492758539923,"score_spread":0.24416874733653077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516910803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17853425,0.025612185,0.0017227493,0.33932868,0.00019345521,0.00003623463,0.00020210902,0.000013141648,0.4543572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97715193,0.0056841946,0.00025098145,0.0073705777,0.000115404844,0.00001034391,0.00002234828,0.000004577781,0.009389687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971187,0.0007722993,0.00004760215,0.00014546669,0.00084480457,0.0010712513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958364,0.0024103075,0.00043097752,0.00012506962,0.00070168404,0.0004955856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031557966,0.00017465554,0.00025347542,0.0013793317,0.008998958,0.008942104,0.00079707353,0.005022439,0.005574863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060892017,0.00017866115,0.00025855406,0.0022346526,0.02956894,0.005105996,0.002282677,0.002948061,0.0002522026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017687109,0.000043118216,0.0050140154,0.000058238104,0.000009033347,0.0002636675,0.010475085,0.00022023858,0.00007948653,0.95817,0.011758623,0.013890851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032609667,0.000038248676,0.036218632,0.0007218696,0.000054898115,0.00039589324,0.06619556,0.0007159726,0.0003113092,0.7716211,0.1236269,0.000067027635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72785056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7665186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72785056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020964818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03213267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5475043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517409699","doi":"10.24908/ss.v8i4.4189","title":"In Further Defence of Privacy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Computer security; Information privacy; Computer science; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03582266078957138,"score_gpt":0.2762062404584458,"score_spread":0.2403835796688744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517409699","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016115069,0.006700597,0.0029870197,0.9065658,0.006394974,0.000024320476,0.00007464163,0.000043176282,0.07559794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17122184,0.004620592,0.0039888523,0.6954991,0.01428658,0.00019425481,0.00009260094,0.00016153819,0.109934695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799799,0.0117099825,0.0007145306,0.0022150215,0.0033175484,0.0020631568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98090726,0.014214168,0.0006631357,0.0017110513,0.0017876887,0.00071672525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022669079,0.0008378185,0.0008461157,0.0009925115,0.010511352,0.015785754,0.002951646,0.040648524,0.010045495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047344115,0.0005138546,0.0013299652,0.0008963785,0.02951296,0.023217339,0.00899132,0.030245446,0.003244045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017211043,0.000006214242,0.00006966225,0.000042337524,0.0000060604734,0.00005460068,0.00276256,0.00004592133,0.00008568162,0.88303983,0.10986421,0.0040056393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025288025,0.000012827134,0.0001563042,0.00019271801,0.000008884774,0.0000874489,0.0023425168,0.00017717363,0.00026251725,0.53934985,0.45735735,0.000027061355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006091104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063663153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040648524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046694446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075907395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119886994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517549971","doi":"","title":"Network Neutrality: Justifiable Discrimination, Unjustifiable Discrimination, and the Bright Line Between Them","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Net neutrality; Government (linguistics); The Internet; Competition (biology); Power (physics); Control (management); Neutrality; Law and economics; Line (geometry); Price discrimination; Business; Economics; Internet privacy; Computer security; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science; Management; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.034565836075997544,"score_gpt":0.28384704638020863,"score_spread":0.24928121030421108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517549971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06679819,0.002277199,0.072546445,0.099425465,0.0019853418,0.0005398098,0.00025850203,0.00014229893,0.75602674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94518507,0.0006143269,0.012915044,0.026252884,0.0011993047,0.000956627,0.000069531445,0.00008927214,0.012717968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95980835,0.015419292,0.0022012289,0.0047663855,0.014115366,0.003689421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9607467,0.022294981,0.003825422,0.0063282014,0.004795514,0.0020091995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03656935,0.00071311474,0.0011956601,0.0019662252,0.0053466125,0.012631352,0.003113278,0.015314191,0.0075071026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07900173,0.0005544141,0.00095572736,0.0011639551,0.060152598,0.017534085,0.008821793,0.0144138755,0.0010019991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014228191,0.000019246005,0.00024758893,0.00001389963,0.000003187082,0.00003550241,0.00018748204,0.00008649341,0.00004794103,0.99594635,0.0010597035,0.002338332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042111664,0.00003721292,0.0003089928,0.00014754351,0.000007863162,0.000074254946,0.0005018726,0.00079727697,0.0002227146,0.98440164,0.013435747,0.000022688677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029235291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002468044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03656935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061784624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009745897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19339949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522148397","doi":"","title":"Shielding the Public Interest: What Canada Can Learn from the United States in the Wake of National Post and Globe & Mail","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Freedom of the press; Political science; Confidentiality; Globe; Freedom of information; Privilege (computing); Presumption; Politics","score_opus":0.10035977786571171,"score_gpt":0.32405598520166395,"score_spread":0.22369620733595225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522148397","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037672205,0.020760022,0.00020605922,0.9158451,0.0039976053,0.000012004291,0.00028976647,0.000033348053,0.055088855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22456281,0.058530785,0.0010300098,0.6591891,0.005184851,0.000035554167,0.00039698227,0.00015091461,0.050918996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99189067,0.0010921066,0.00016200593,0.0005918659,0.002757879,0.003505429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96678746,0.0053577824,0.00077723817,0.0008405976,0.014588673,0.01164821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008101926,0.00047963866,0.000835749,0.0020059643,0.024907967,0.023329478,0.0025890726,0.014986291,0.018663183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021946715,0.00042160082,0.0007028761,0.0034219446,0.019377666,0.009558835,0.005180187,0.019718219,0.0018557947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008710566,0.00006429964,0.0039300993,0.00023328075,0.000021667822,0.00060113054,0.005444551,0.00018408502,0.00010749715,0.16475204,0.751709,0.072865315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022865694,0.000017570483,0.004927717,0.0013876808,0.000027111813,0.0001070262,0.01124149,0.00012494766,0.0001396388,0.02285796,0.9590457,0.00010019072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9635547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9844391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10954564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10954564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27905324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.794813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533284965","doi":"10.58948/2331-3528.1769","title":"Facebook Fatalities: Students, Social Networking, and the First Amendment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Response Biomedical (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Internet privacy; First amendment; Social media; Business; Political science; Law; Computer science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.06487862511180706,"score_gpt":0.3181166496825823,"score_spread":0.25323802457077527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533284965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19030613,0.008032631,0.00089214987,0.1979084,0.0017093824,0.00013678776,0.0003671717,0.00007079151,0.60057646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95204884,0.0018658252,0.00016528615,0.023155477,0.0004984403,0.00019360174,0.000067081906,0.000012850707,0.021992564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99493563,0.0025526846,0.00015148139,0.00041141018,0.0005518036,0.0013970188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905738,0.0046501006,0.0018806149,0.00069239206,0.0006631267,0.0015398365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036174979,0.00040557436,0.00022550773,0.0015963613,0.011453297,0.008306099,0.0013275766,0.010737994,0.008854458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014696119,0.00028186795,0.00039393743,0.0007673677,0.010135668,0.0046784505,0.0065027317,0.008780685,0.0007150222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003902043,0.0002467308,0.034486067,0.000097392905,0.000026403752,0.0026246356,0.045418,0.0002605517,0.00011197109,0.7767856,0.101395495,0.038508132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059851172,0.00022532174,0.13623701,0.0032867284,0.00008505334,0.0032842357,0.19306296,0.0013719873,0.0009886733,0.11771049,0.54349905,0.00018862676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031118643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058373343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031118643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003965949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048411507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061874986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535423054","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2000v25n3a1171","title":"Conflicting Communication Interests in America: The Case of National Public Radio","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Advertising; Telecommunications; Media studies; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.04894969466197306,"score_gpt":0.3321035278879562,"score_spread":0.28315383322598314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535423054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15179375,0.0022987116,0.002890249,0.14507796,0.00035308258,0.000056499783,0.000047245798,0.000025338199,0.69745713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.956751,0.0007948072,0.00051338563,0.021850573,0.00037307432,0.00007240346,0.0000122886195,0.000024703348,0.019607723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810425,0.008874689,0.00035235754,0.001332227,0.0018426895,0.006555553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542754,0.037514314,0.0021483658,0.0011469462,0.0023456817,0.0025692252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015461848,0.0004898562,0.0009969234,0.0016165521,0.034997728,0.026594324,0.0031534648,0.04008112,0.01200794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03237757,0.0009074161,0.0007723307,0.0027800642,0.035893794,0.012255986,0.011035365,0.021196334,0.0007483542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005331473,0.000060839506,0.001918528,0.00003691771,0.000024746338,0.0026861434,0.05108945,0.00028796945,0.00016085719,0.92332286,0.014551722,0.0058066477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017945975,0.00007934808,0.00418334,0.00055045815,0.00017164291,0.002947325,0.16589525,0.0018289443,0.0006441624,0.51029056,0.31302214,0.00020747552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10066666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14188376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10066666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013465589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015295082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2001614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540839831","doi":"","title":"The Once and Future New Brunswick Free Press","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal of New Brunswick Studies / Revue d’études sur le Nouveau-Brunswick","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Newspaper; Monopoly; Concurrence; Art; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03500968786305314,"score_gpt":0.2788420137893545,"score_spread":0.24383232592630139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540839831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077049276,0.04052868,0.00056920823,0.22337043,0.0070802327,0.00006952598,0.0011410462,0.00023792165,0.719298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.068036474,0.013417206,0.00082759955,0.033267017,0.0011433607,0.000064334745,0.00059437926,0.00019442332,0.8824552],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996429,0.0004855051,0.00015907057,0.0004210726,0.0012516417,0.0012537059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936232,0.0012297775,0.00041510194,0.00057773443,0.0017224115,0.0024319147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002541684,0.00065298885,0.00041209647,0.0031038327,0.0110600535,0.035728212,0.0022757354,0.0058655078,0.09254842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006409895,0.00065449695,0.0004102724,0.004851297,0.007948188,0.010792842,0.0048182188,0.0062183505,0.012834698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041527263,0.000033500863,0.0011985685,0.00023513616,0.000014425178,0.00081627816,0.004318362,0.00012561632,0.00066322763,0.40105173,0.5279935,0.06350799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039237725,0.0000024449494,0.00069414626,0.00010045591,0.0000019215095,0.000029804847,0.001315295,0.000017255119,0.000059043494,0.0022084014,0.99555236,0.00001486883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77210134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8991096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22789866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06947308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07532511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5040648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541019669","doi":"","title":"Big Censorship in the Big House—A Quarter-Century After Turner v. Safley : Muting Movies, Music & Books Behind Bars","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northwestern journal of law and social policy","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Supreme court; Law; Deference; Prison; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sociology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.04263576784232707,"score_gpt":0.28678445054721746,"score_spread":0.2441486827048904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541019669","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28892425,0.036666647,0.003125131,0.5058958,0.010058774,0.00005352463,0.00021825345,0.00007214866,0.15498552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82875466,0.0062884204,0.0006950084,0.101545446,0.0027105394,0.000026811458,0.00006262262,0.000064202744,0.05985222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970049,0.00093404594,0.00009174718,0.00041194513,0.0008658196,0.00069148716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551916,0.0030409864,0.000287686,0.00025472816,0.00046511047,0.0004323133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004738181,0.00022587438,0.00023770575,0.00070595194,0.014910537,0.008623285,0.00078341,0.008805826,0.0020169523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008768683,0.00040304658,0.00033989377,0.0007313406,0.016179021,0.007365212,0.003242018,0.010714329,0.00023767064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010501758,0.00007421338,0.0041954867,0.0000722692,0.000022510198,0.002145007,0.09057982,0.00016691387,0.0011685914,0.6156134,0.21923687,0.066619985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022163793,0.0000808172,0.011464497,0.00055060454,0.00003419451,0.0005335614,0.05137991,0.00020423725,0.0031465644,0.037724864,0.89474076,0.00011780518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.098029606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24137643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098029606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072906236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062313857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19491804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544484976","doi":"","title":"The Meaning of Equality: Sexual Harassment, Stalking, and Provocation in Canada, Australia, and the United States","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stalking; Harassment; Vision; Provocation test; Criminology; Political science; Meaning (existential); Law; Sexual assault; Gender studies; Psychology; Sociology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.020288409025182096,"score_gpt":0.2861259670294192,"score_spread":0.26583755800423714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544484976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6658179,0.01019732,0.0007413718,0.1046534,0.0005074386,0.000043919066,0.0000961576,0.000011423424,0.21793108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913487,0.0021362167,0.0001013985,0.0033685812,0.0000452992,0.000009059011,0.000011653983,0.000004139215,0.002975024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939418,0.0016088777,0.00012700104,0.00020970705,0.0015806265,0.002532001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952075,0.0013938341,0.0005086799,0.00009324611,0.0014185796,0.0013780969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002928359,0.0002287759,0.0004722155,0.0024366863,0.030313509,0.010571581,0.0012704954,0.002571312,0.0017913405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008506846,0.0002723545,0.00024172297,0.0033576668,0.04302402,0.0029573797,0.0069756103,0.005614603,0.000069630456],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060473143,0.00007612808,0.028485162,0.000088566536,0.00002136712,0.000959216,0.30742666,0.0005084057,0.00020491738,0.615465,0.01057845,0.03612571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038253074,0.000049151095,0.12349667,0.00086510513,0.000061435174,0.0004292171,0.6829463,0.000691639,0.00034452762,0.0633577,0.12754661,0.00017342616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9882157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99353176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09122073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09122073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13009985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6618558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546560973","doi":"","title":"Censorship, Sexuality, and the Possibilities of Legal Reform: Or, Can We \"Queer\" the \"Canadian Charter\"","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Charter; Censorship; Human sexuality; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.028548157280662147,"score_gpt":0.27809700095813367,"score_spread":0.24954884367747152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546560973","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029201182,0.021721559,0.0023672634,0.48011008,0.00076661387,0.00003058973,0.00017400192,0.000045058136,0.46558374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90951204,0.008556745,0.0009071924,0.032481644,0.0010396907,0.000036743182,0.00004666921,0.000037539914,0.047381733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505,0.0015601779,0.0000636799,0.0003694438,0.001262822,0.0016938349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934007,0.0029617199,0.00063168106,0.0007650466,0.0012281627,0.0010127801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069387043,0.0003475626,0.0007051875,0.0014367186,0.013552342,0.01405039,0.0021740268,0.0090992525,0.00868617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014434449,0.00022773954,0.00046664182,0.002019722,0.09434463,0.008554443,0.0032349252,0.007744217,0.0004815322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052371392,0.000004616252,0.00015198867,0.0000116347455,0.0000015903123,0.000008786606,0.0015802904,0.000054625718,0.000018708952,0.99110633,0.004717055,0.0023391743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027049606,0.000008796591,0.0016253813,0.0002632914,0.00001407513,0.000027040116,0.007452595,0.00028854152,0.00012858443,0.8114199,0.17870799,0.000036792935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7994518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8492666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20054817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040859815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.077965505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40345848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556840283","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2011v36n1a2252","title":"Interpreting Privacy on Campus: The Freedom of Information and Personal Privacy and Ontario Universities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Privacy laws of the United States; Privacy policy; Information privacy; Political science; Internet privacy; Privacy law; Information privacy law; Personally identifiable information; Public relations; Academic freedom; Sociology; Higher education; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02244158160507998,"score_gpt":0.22813103987382152,"score_spread":0.20568945826874155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556840283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52974606,0.008964577,0.003364879,0.1461335,0.00031469594,0.00012391045,0.00024648177,0.000040776897,0.3110652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98756975,0.002292242,0.0004445708,0.0013655722,0.000031618853,0.000017780108,0.000023874853,0.000013585682,0.008240922],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99075574,0.0039839926,0.00035339064,0.0005295064,0.0021737006,0.0022036862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859735,0.0068827565,0.0017594845,0.00083512923,0.002068494,0.0024805467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007760598,0.0002788082,0.00035296433,0.0018805474,0.037675295,0.0153506305,0.0015444292,0.002724844,0.0046180817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01874262,0.0004247611,0.00038769358,0.004082818,0.050698884,0.007564443,0.008463535,0.0033620829,0.00023427361],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051780982,0.000023751325,0.017259926,0.00011697493,0.000010706593,0.0006407085,0.7793022,0.00027779848,0.00035062656,0.17228565,0.007830445,0.021849534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016507842,0.000014476381,0.029128838,0.00047884812,0.00002262396,0.00020090945,0.76565534,0.00040392682,0.0003667344,0.032173358,0.17145576,0.00008267708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96978194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98466575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96978194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17123193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16203529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9612535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557208259","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Case of R. v. Patrick: Are Privacy Rights Out with the Garbage?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Garbage; Privacy rights; Law; Right to privacy; Computer security; Internet privacy; Political science; Business; Information privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.009075742598843755,"score_gpt":0.24812440252588303,"score_spread":0.23904865992703928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557208259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058484275,0.008778187,0.001388215,0.3483476,0.0007728231,0.00010893175,0.00045786463,0.000054008604,0.58160806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.725109,0.0077674952,0.0014346485,0.16221905,0.00040366297,0.000080357204,0.00010423061,0.000078833466,0.10280281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870028,0.001513471,0.00017116737,0.00081649685,0.0047807232,0.005715251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920614,0.0036654952,0.00037186564,0.00030201455,0.0024376884,0.0011616807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006784567,0.00063964113,0.00069410965,0.0015866237,0.045574766,0.012295851,0.0036361164,0.02112794,0.00637149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026518784,0.00079564046,0.0010295645,0.0043459027,0.023872185,0.0053449036,0.0035337696,0.021601094,0.0006791801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005382134,0.000022161068,0.0018048481,0.000084438594,0.000019861283,0.0015883981,0.013163097,0.00033247596,0.00027953996,0.83185023,0.14103007,0.009771168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109448396,0.000052817883,0.012588397,0.0009722352,0.00018628173,0.0014594081,0.04705436,0.00091382314,0.0013637977,0.14220932,0.7925624,0.00052765856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9869761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08757396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08757396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1751231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63539654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576771245","doi":"","title":"Defending the First Amendment from Antidiscrimination Laws","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Marketplace of ideas; Civil liberties; Political science; Law and economics; Voting; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.031103195050808757,"score_gpt":0.27919495506796277,"score_spread":0.24809176001715402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576771245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03510775,0.0076951506,0.102664635,0.15635332,0.0034361505,0.00023947166,0.00016097625,0.00025998283,0.6940825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8214424,0.004307259,0.0267584,0.079958834,0.0037439407,0.0007285853,0.00011285669,0.0001804914,0.06276714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96823335,0.009242246,0.0014967512,0.0045232708,0.012449968,0.0040543983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9665033,0.022345183,0.0022599564,0.0039837584,0.0040654102,0.00084241113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029957809,0.0009205802,0.0013224701,0.0019302076,0.0070077498,0.015997982,0.0037562023,0.015808655,0.0029790888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04463038,0.0011675784,0.001662993,0.0010263929,0.043461766,0.010975357,0.006985937,0.024176203,0.0016508726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003092182,0.0000053630574,0.000049444396,0.00000858485,0.0000015616291,0.00002274812,0.00035309687,0.000063920364,0.00006100196,0.99723876,0.0009885858,0.0012038668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039998467,0.000043391345,0.00022985807,0.00023278946,0.000014640787,0.000109344975,0.00030220242,0.00055968744,0.000873763,0.8926794,0.10487774,0.000037170732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073325983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005806035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029957809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008861114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015060139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15843397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582656234","doi":"","title":"The Government's Increasing Reliance on — And Abuse of — The Deliberative Process Evidentiary Privilege: '[T]he Last Will Be First'","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Doctrine; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.006156941219121719,"score_gpt":0.2355834736430507,"score_spread":0.229426532423929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582656234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031530205,0.012878377,0.09256208,0.2830531,0.0035859542,0.00007298827,0.00011705167,0.00053131627,0.5756689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85326475,0.005326172,0.014569023,0.08264521,0.0018774902,0.00011941835,0.000081697835,0.00020440116,0.04191184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9737345,0.011481796,0.0011869682,0.0028889466,0.009319073,0.00138859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9596057,0.024863603,0.00279534,0.006932561,0.004878701,0.00092412945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017752172,0.00038832202,0.0004508671,0.0012304848,0.0059883003,0.016485639,0.0016157213,0.009525684,0.0042638676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0363956,0.00061713444,0.00069057633,0.0019880126,0.039976723,0.01228693,0.008404115,0.02089914,0.0013519485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005987082,0.0000062663535,0.00016359035,0.0000298898,0.000005821814,0.000048607766,0.0033680263,0.00010693602,0.00019618506,0.97830176,0.008988319,0.008778551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017303064,0.000042536823,0.0008674115,0.0003738936,0.000025543583,0.00034047948,0.0019211671,0.00056268496,0.0012351109,0.38279918,0.6117271,0.000087479806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020009866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016092649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020009866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007522818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013916546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093883574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583665215","doi":"","title":"The First Amendment: Cases and Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; First amendment; Political science; Law; Supreme court","score_opus":0.022470765148343928,"score_gpt":0.25056895084796305,"score_spread":0.22809818569961912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583665215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019162353,0.04571935,0.018544037,0.09753524,0.019188304,0.0003246181,0.0008799165,0.00038042638,0.8155119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09949171,0.05966389,0.024745554,0.07523298,0.03004824,0.0022004643,0.0023522666,0.0009211068,0.70534366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98822635,0.004687552,0.0007293525,0.000998701,0.0045251152,0.0008329182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98442274,0.011386546,0.00058853766,0.0012491506,0.001965532,0.00038750411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008900142,0.00082709535,0.0006679571,0.0034524507,0.0036846427,0.012451366,0.0023607204,0.0073530897,0.024574157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034247834,0.0008535734,0.0008533969,0.0026595048,0.011395895,0.010059071,0.004152182,0.008878351,0.0120197395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000088710985,0.000018323552,0.00006775427,0.00011861184,0.0000021229203,0.00006529624,0.0006445098,0.0001734117,0.000103946906,0.539233,0.43010327,0.029460864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006598045,0.000009167767,0.0001685835,0.0005556736,0.0000020024102,0.00006755083,0.0003799722,0.0001776541,0.00009869286,0.07765454,0.92086685,0.000012793866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006299154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045321523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024574157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064768232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008173146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08220875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583961686","doi":"","title":"Bartnicki v. Vopper: Another Media Victory or Ominous Warning of a Potential Change in Supreme Court First Amendment Jurisprudence?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Victory; Political science; First amendment; Politics","score_opus":0.030580313648835882,"score_gpt":0.24316110952310008,"score_spread":0.2125807958742642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583961686","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024493055,0.00625379,0.0014495437,0.4140243,0.0032980123,0.000031628562,0.000121468736,0.00009371269,0.55023444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5269983,0.0029549997,0.0009052295,0.31575462,0.002799686,0.00009170209,0.00007287766,0.00010812898,0.15031439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970233,0.0007477203,0.00008007471,0.00044410137,0.000834841,0.0008699495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711597,0.0019997633,0.00017850834,0.00019041788,0.00026654953,0.00024887073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038031912,0.00026475103,0.00044139283,0.00097654294,0.009326885,0.008537361,0.0017549117,0.018375332,0.0061820936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0138712125,0.00035647344,0.00036286688,0.0006722317,0.012890508,0.006492891,0.0031393317,0.013878311,0.0012898577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034225093,0.00001535694,0.00030249965,0.00002828331,0.0000070190613,0.00036967648,0.003160556,0.00005634203,0.00034127914,0.87931913,0.108896375,0.0074691405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006959302,0.000042298067,0.00200478,0.00047034086,0.00003892428,0.0003440969,0.0049426844,0.00033060278,0.0017684647,0.2436135,0.746289,0.00008568852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046893224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07288895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046893224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004674258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005315696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09324056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W159713558","doi":"10.29173/alr57","title":"Lights, Judges, Access: How Active Judicial Review of Discretionary Decisions Protects Access to Government Information","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Access to information; Information access; Political science; Internet privacy; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.03312850490154444,"score_gpt":0.32043022774911906,"score_spread":0.2873017228475746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W159713558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063160144,0.037548356,0.031864636,0.23094133,0.0012274696,0.00026150292,0.00028269654,0.00022331104,0.6344906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90723217,0.012057757,0.004389812,0.03788374,0.0007988642,0.00006332684,0.00006489825,0.00008416185,0.03742527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97160375,0.0066237017,0.00074505695,0.0023772982,0.012831291,0.0058189817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9695182,0.016483134,0.0018619886,0.0016055921,0.0087026255,0.0018284061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018122481,0.00029395518,0.00058727595,0.0031619004,0.011997579,0.019159917,0.0022996464,0.0074476213,0.0037434923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046736512,0.0005360763,0.0005456097,0.0029837496,0.032537904,0.005876799,0.0045122746,0.007399314,0.00047186902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034859564,0.000025567144,0.0035930355,0.00016508436,0.000057810408,0.00044792425,0.011087332,0.0006505864,0.0007526271,0.894612,0.037908494,0.050664667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009493384,0.000063288804,0.019384352,0.0011242359,0.00019095675,0.00039398225,0.008313577,0.0012700681,0.0014256763,0.45200676,0.51551086,0.00022136526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7698428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8653331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2301572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042308263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09748258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46302527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604042393","doi":"10.1353/sex.2003.0040","title":"Sex without Consent: Rape and Sexual Coercion in America (review)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Sexuality","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual coercion; Coercion (linguistics); Criminology; Psychology; Sexual assault; Political science; Injury prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07634231893190566,"score_gpt":0.3019560891570102,"score_spread":0.22561377022510457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604042393","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018716686,0.9987986,0.0000074919376,0.00060537935,0.0001244499,0.0000029663124,0.0000059241074,0.0000010319955,0.00026696952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020669822,0.9971106,0.000021290674,0.0005094724,0.00018390879,0.0000051483157,0.000009406969,4.968467e-7,0.00009279477],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991406,0.00029330348,0.00014748408,0.00009632292,0.00027453614,0.000047771875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955916,0.0026052997,0.00097422046,0.00006264235,0.00057652814,0.00018959679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014786011,0.0005210934,0.0019038916,0.0030450139,0.0005711954,0.0021991795,0.0006159724,0.001896356,0.002461515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006038119,0.0003966714,0.0004135488,0.007841289,0.0019849222,0.00253252,0.00073305157,0.0013091617,0.00038038823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001602683,0.00008007803,0.0037787987,0.09481268,0.0004429744,0.000728426,0.0012698323,0.00018533242,0.0002493573,0.0030330175,0.08817961,0.8070796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000103332924,0.00025507915,0.03121442,0.12076879,0.001477962,0.0076366067,0.0032830352,0.0001442351,0.00017965281,0.0021964929,0.832669,0.00007155076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014747601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034018137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014747601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017077967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006107989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029323518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604518897","doi":"","title":"Beyond the Margin of Litigation: Reforming U.S. Election Administration to Avoid Electoral Meltdown","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential election; Political science; Democracy; Administration (probate law); Politics; Law; Election law; Primary election; Split-ticket voting; General election; Public administration","score_opus":0.008920350884462315,"score_gpt":0.2741506829325709,"score_spread":0.2652303320481086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604518897","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12669253,0.016075391,0.036862273,0.5493702,0.006553396,0.00068525254,0.000081947524,0.0015510126,0.262128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8003556,0.003277052,0.016605832,0.13811737,0.004047781,0.0005082692,0.00010863191,0.0002281834,0.03675134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97099304,0.012365357,0.0012318282,0.0023912063,0.007008388,0.0060101966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9657708,0.013988143,0.0034338,0.0034406956,0.0070715738,0.006294988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029201884,0.0006251489,0.00066918717,0.0033627222,0.018253552,0.018712811,0.0030145682,0.0111569045,0.00851668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059574243,0.0008694179,0.0010536325,0.0020133378,0.009662178,0.016477298,0.012036978,0.016836686,0.0026675758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001883944,0.00092462084,0.011772406,0.00024073319,0.00009801767,0.0005943516,0.014151108,0.002883475,0.0022236884,0.4308723,0.20750095,0.32854998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004548831,0.0012825179,0.026759185,0.0011365665,0.00021335685,0.0005061101,0.01573528,0.0070285127,0.0033202658,0.18940671,0.7538906,0.00026606885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02031878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04169139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029201884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009476005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035639558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15443617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606914710","doi":"","title":"\"I'm Not That Kind of Girl\": White Femininity, the Other and the Legal/Social Sanctioning of Sexualized Violence Against Racialized Women","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Girl; Femininity; White (mutation); Gender studies; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.02699265925914724,"score_gpt":0.28414084329562,"score_spread":0.25714818403647277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606914710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69684076,0.002495093,0.00036052198,0.07352505,0.00044066302,0.0000616286,0.00009318482,0.000011912651,0.22617114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859423,0.0006739562,0.00008918507,0.003982007,0.000048797247,0.00002983815,0.000014745508,0.000013343758,0.009205877],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941298,0.0025280013,0.00007811135,0.0002507167,0.0009426787,0.0020707606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99641824,0.0012410282,0.0005699925,0.00012154025,0.00054483424,0.0011042946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005445911,0.00036320518,0.00047207193,0.001782115,0.047561858,0.007261729,0.001623913,0.0030224922,0.0046947636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009439357,0.0004075393,0.0002546733,0.001878403,0.029384121,0.0035884087,0.004908442,0.007436312,0.00026111113],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055603206,0.00012563162,0.017162908,0.000048689886,0.000014309667,0.0004292393,0.7607499,0.000049490893,0.00026182752,0.19850038,0.010987032,0.011614993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013280783,0.0000173893,0.026192728,0.00022798817,0.000021631677,0.00015360287,0.93424404,0.00005588913,0.00019373551,0.0066840597,0.03217156,0.00002404064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8526848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94126636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1473152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020457678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051162392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2963655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W161696500","doi":"10.3138/9781442682337-027","title":"The Intersection of Administrative Law with the Anti-Terrorism Bill","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Political science; Discretion; Terrorism; Context (archaeology); National security; Law; Jurisprudence; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.035653931712052764,"score_gpt":0.2562185986998351,"score_spread":0.22056466698778232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W161696500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03608813,0.009127776,0.053857174,0.1959485,0.0014957123,0.000139363,0.000068472196,0.0001599535,0.703115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84584713,0.0052659214,0.016709521,0.061068624,0.0027706418,0.00046212718,0.00008475086,0.00020516665,0.06758604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95299655,0.02059444,0.002450739,0.003805431,0.015464433,0.004688518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95549786,0.03367397,0.0022009565,0.0037822737,0.003884951,0.0009599566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027477922,0.00035660499,0.00092413457,0.002075173,0.010370437,0.022982717,0.0017527489,0.01218978,0.0042520426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036018454,0.0010114884,0.0014524672,0.0029630319,0.0498127,0.018145481,0.008368467,0.016437303,0.0010562999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002415009,0.000004271357,0.00009084319,0.000008146747,0.0000010372777,0.000027438613,0.0007986588,0.000066481,0.000026007854,0.9961687,0.0010923058,0.0017136341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017948701,0.000053929434,0.0014399051,0.00034298882,0.000016758133,0.0001648872,0.0024747888,0.0007257583,0.00039310078,0.69827837,0.29604518,0.000046350277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0141328005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011451371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027477922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013165753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020547217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14531887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1652582","doi":"10.7164/antibiotics.44.723","title":"How Much Surveillance is Too Much? Some Thoughts on Surveillance, Democracy, and the Political Value of Privacy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Antibiotics","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Internet privacy; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Politics; Business; Democracy; Political science; Public relations; Computer security; Law; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.012445602173918742,"score_gpt":0.269641667919304,"score_spread":0.2571960657453852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1652582","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009322708,0.056658745,0.0045066276,0.8801128,0.0028971876,0.000017183007,0.00005781009,0.000021896436,0.046404883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80033493,0.06325765,0.004681455,0.09265562,0.01775353,0.00008794502,0.000049714774,0.000050202743,0.02112903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975036,0.0017458297,0.000064452935,0.00018777302,0.0002656032,0.00023269436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99585223,0.0031549619,0.00024146793,0.0001635079,0.00031882647,0.00026896238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044948,0.00038884324,0.00058607257,0.001256731,0.0028770426,0.006274331,0.0012253071,0.00656605,0.0034307258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004992106,0.00024289681,0.00044807483,0.0010833472,0.03250392,0.013556754,0.0014674035,0.0058003813,0.00031163442],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002625575,0.00002048143,0.00025089813,0.0000754851,0.000009662027,0.0001726583,0.0024517167,0.00035827426,0.00018010043,0.96930444,0.018229019,0.008921019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001555805,0.000043264474,0.0005149259,0.00019427163,0.000004708299,0.0001353286,0.0046828464,0.00055036566,0.00014167474,0.9020602,0.09162377,0.000033115317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035975508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041102963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00656605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004156384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012707852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030156791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1707063435","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1233","title":"Deprivations of Liberty: The Impact of the Charter on Substantive Criminal Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Sovereignty; Substantive due process; Law and economics; Reasonable suspicion; Fundamental rights; State (computer science); Supreme court; Sociology; Politics; Human rights","score_opus":0.061725975899735594,"score_gpt":0.34427046593197164,"score_spread":0.28254449003223603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1707063435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065104604,0.010997152,0.027352545,0.15272658,0.0013227023,0.00015133974,0.00015540677,0.0001278657,0.7420619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9476806,0.0042737816,0.00798081,0.0178143,0.0010702908,0.000112803194,0.000053603002,0.000067516725,0.020946287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97367394,0.010184298,0.00057536975,0.0021605697,0.009891796,0.0035140016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9451686,0.04275837,0.0025105523,0.0025064948,0.0054440144,0.0016119533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021876981,0.00036277418,0.0005240571,0.0024951391,0.0063546128,0.015026354,0.0018843657,0.006390673,0.0043947725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05650713,0.00049361604,0.0010336151,0.0015428483,0.036256686,0.008365045,0.005873933,0.010562926,0.00052465434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009895242,0.00000872136,0.0003692103,0.000011939766,0.0000024956228,0.000058305905,0.0005350887,0.00034009435,0.000059850587,0.9905428,0.0025847403,0.0054768217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051860592,0.00011467795,0.0050835554,0.00051082455,0.000049160502,0.00015017012,0.0015217897,0.003936546,0.0005816284,0.8682764,0.11961847,0.00010484914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21955112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18880135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21955112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02735825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036062207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4365464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1759440862","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1054","title":"Hierarchies of Harm in Canadian Criminal Law: The Marijuana Trilogy and the Forcible “Correction” of Children","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Law; Supreme court; Criminal law; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Harm principle; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.021034814159474512,"score_gpt":0.2799589661272835,"score_spread":0.258924151967809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1759440862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12043662,0.02965943,0.004293134,0.13054714,0.0005970046,0.00011873245,0.00035899016,0.000043070133,0.71394587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95544714,0.009528895,0.0022463843,0.010883773,0.00017233803,0.000049984435,0.00009844646,0.00002740473,0.021545606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99297404,0.0009864997,0.00016759973,0.00042353087,0.0036128133,0.0018354476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932147,0.0019404072,0.00065140607,0.00020602878,0.0029688452,0.0010185261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003979003,0.00046890182,0.0005068238,0.0068042087,0.025256988,0.009097348,0.002206615,0.0040855547,0.003895607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011796628,0.0005234383,0.0005244991,0.0052487063,0.030710353,0.0038314587,0.004292516,0.005582077,0.00015998314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007551927,0.00001228692,0.005516227,0.000050245715,0.000008102034,0.00020281337,0.012285356,0.0003279316,0.00006987278,0.95639604,0.01129799,0.013825554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058937883,0.00004197616,0.08273099,0.0011546826,0.00011751776,0.00049819174,0.035432898,0.0022207666,0.00040948045,0.3718099,0.50522375,0.0003008406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.842269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15773098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16795026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9769127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1794559","doi":"10.1042/bst019442s","title":"VALUE PLURALISM & NEGATIVE FREEDOM IN CANADIAN EDUCATION: THE TRINITY AND SURREY CASES","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Political science; Politics; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Legal pluralism; Philosophy; Comparative law; Legal realism","score_opus":0.17454146032069748,"score_gpt":0.40027561376183696,"score_spread":0.22573415344113948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1794559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36596823,0.0064855097,0.0013797487,0.11285835,0.0006539992,0.00017797483,0.00044828074,0.000039321163,0.51198864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545821,0.0014316313,0.00040316445,0.01037416,0.000081190505,0.00004413359,0.000054563858,0.000015487767,0.033013657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98435736,0.0016565893,0.00031223882,0.0010451287,0.005083285,0.007545378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98565906,0.0059973253,0.00090514333,0.00041523855,0.0036468478,0.0033764997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065500173,0.00044641577,0.0007386974,0.0029536027,0.04380048,0.010079552,0.0022719684,0.0066974876,0.005318826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015246023,0.000576178,0.00076217914,0.00413972,0.026986416,0.0021829482,0.0066925213,0.011358827,0.00023246108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057074765,0.00003310118,0.012874999,0.00010395926,0.000027987968,0.0027223094,0.054667097,0.00056812394,0.00018233972,0.8849859,0.032632913,0.0111442115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012605822,0.000052925792,0.059690453,0.0012571679,0.0002201201,0.0013877684,0.14749172,0.0018824091,0.0014051887,0.09165428,0.69430333,0.0005286491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99213797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16396831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97568434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179536926","doi":"","title":"Hate speech, fighting words, and beyond - why American law is unique","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Presidential system; Declaration of independence; Faith; Supreme court; State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Politics; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02436251169976915,"score_gpt":0.3023062074226997,"score_spread":0.27794369572293054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W179536926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06447123,0.0077638226,0.0028881386,0.3350917,0.0041404366,0.00001579037,0.000051120125,0.00010495052,0.58547294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8811741,0.0027449601,0.00066259,0.06901339,0.0017884083,0.00002492477,0.000027313012,0.00010026613,0.044464156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581146,0.0016516721,0.00010052365,0.0004999834,0.0010181869,0.0009182404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669087,0.0014712029,0.00023983038,0.00029856365,0.0005556131,0.00074390747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003750365,0.00024551176,0.00023762326,0.00084063975,0.019018382,0.014528922,0.00073713803,0.005286557,0.007422205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005573489,0.0002641731,0.0002521759,0.0006705812,0.040767632,0.012125578,0.004010581,0.01140858,0.001481479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017468063,0.00003397017,0.0015890972,0.000029389988,0.000004684735,0.00029143607,0.049724456,0.000028045888,0.00036904862,0.8509063,0.07533009,0.021675998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007049955,0.000020145106,0.0025658177,0.00023882592,0.000010017456,0.0005379193,0.07978376,0.000111102934,0.00046049352,0.18113777,0.7350828,0.000044200606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013238833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028317537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019018382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038302685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035561451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027790666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W181806217","doi":"","title":"Human Rights in the Global Village: The Challenges of Privacy and National Security","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Human rights; National security; The Right to Privacy; Political science; Law; Right to privacy; Patriot Act; Democracy; Secrecy; Politics","score_opus":0.012701000189044617,"score_gpt":0.2825418435077178,"score_spread":0.2698408433186732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W181806217","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02815347,0.022969069,0.008737466,0.60188305,0.0021044745,0.000024405392,0.00003219626,0.00005291758,0.33604297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8582001,0.017454121,0.0037964974,0.07108391,0.0023088139,0.00007711908,0.000037575057,0.00006551413,0.046976253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994194,0.003877044,0.00009038332,0.00031684578,0.0007376439,0.0007840378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99366546,0.0041835327,0.0002774472,0.0005540835,0.00042325867,0.00089631375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054052104,0.00027261584,0.00050463504,0.0006264715,0.00925515,0.013990708,0.0010262097,0.0071320436,0.004008275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004521112,0.00018774676,0.00035844537,0.0011566603,0.042246807,0.016193023,0.008911426,0.00863592,0.00051413657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057092866,0.000006838291,0.00022381847,0.000027089256,0.0000021082765,0.0001407986,0.013456969,0.000096991025,0.00004951087,0.9643865,0.011489335,0.010114358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070682886,0.000019890731,0.00051224517,0.00026319508,0.0000028742184,0.00027711826,0.031369563,0.00020731996,0.000089352354,0.69843465,0.2688033,0.00001348827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058273114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008964786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013990708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004919396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064072325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03569287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1832842522","doi":"","title":"If You Don’t Like It Change the Channel: Radio Censorship Policies and Enforcement in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Enforcement; Transparency (behavior); Public broadcasting; Accountability; Media policy; Political science; Broadcasting (networking); Public relations; Public administration; Advertising; Media studies; Business; Sociology; Law; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.023716967631515047,"score_gpt":0.21372750671492308,"score_spread":0.19001053908340804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1832842522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9092594,0.0017787099,0.000641599,0.022171548,0.0000990469,0.00015645102,0.00033609435,0.000035041492,0.06552213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99049044,0.000554826,0.0002118118,0.0011551619,0.000009148135,0.000023481689,0.00007283594,0.000017701106,0.0074646296],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867207,0.00183393,0.00037609818,0.0011786303,0.0049810754,0.004909527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9660681,0.00888155,0.003932242,0.0010825469,0.013193475,0.006842064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075865663,0.00026668605,0.00067135075,0.0022204733,0.03797815,0.010147659,0.0030336499,0.0024246492,0.004597692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026871335,0.0005794212,0.00041956847,0.005072446,0.014160159,0.002364661,0.003691392,0.004489501,0.00023273764],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030063983,0.00046934382,0.21473257,0.00043916283,0.00014970177,0.0016634545,0.5489079,0.0022224118,0.0018525505,0.11445106,0.037438333,0.077372916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007070031,0.00011749054,0.31955156,0.0006188991,0.000104155595,0.0001965778,0.53168577,0.0023714376,0.00087632774,0.004273531,0.13988829,0.00024530725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99851733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99907696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26209602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26209602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37394527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85586405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916515311","doi":"","title":"Balancing Privacy and the Open Court Principle of Family Law: Does De-Identifying Case Law Protect Anonymity?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Transparency (behavior); Law; Context (archaeology); Privacy laws of the United States; Privacy law; Internet privacy; Common law; Political science; Expectation of privacy; Right to know; Right to privacy; Sociology; Information privacy; Business; Supreme court; Privacy policy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04861317570297575,"score_gpt":0.3553008274656192,"score_spread":0.30668765176264345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1916515311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087964274,0.011532738,0.11016312,0.41967717,0.0013227968,0.00014302514,0.00012645732,0.00007515234,0.36899534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95116127,0.003930033,0.009156172,0.025036264,0.0014344528,0.00015163359,0.00003529551,0.000042452713,0.009052435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96781284,0.020062309,0.0009620589,0.0024561856,0.005609559,0.0030969856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.957155,0.033214647,0.003000775,0.0039400924,0.0016414734,0.0010479753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029700095,0.00036069166,0.0008483491,0.0016974944,0.0080901515,0.012644961,0.0022381095,0.009273281,0.0037927546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0571896,0.0004409014,0.0009520439,0.0015581257,0.052498233,0.024561364,0.009746565,0.007933635,0.0005397075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009697089,0.000016245189,0.000498416,0.000021165284,0.0000074353557,0.00014784609,0.003773991,0.00014193889,0.000051510746,0.98637146,0.0013842151,0.007576068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015370577,0.000020935606,0.0005699016,0.0002242622,0.00001576249,0.0003152805,0.0027013908,0.00031576073,0.00022525506,0.9608089,0.03476501,0.000022074819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054292423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037175084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029700095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005356638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008584224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.157071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933445904","doi":"10.21991/c9m08k","title":"A REVIEW OF THE KEEGSTRA CASE: SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HATE PROPAGANDA LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Precedent","score_opus":0.06449293183224578,"score_gpt":0.32258342611082375,"score_spread":0.258090494278578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1933445904","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000085243955,0.9975292,0.000030685424,0.00090845977,0.00020056906,0.0000043243035,0.000022062017,0.0000011655345,0.0012183839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011648729,0.9972747,0.00006937958,0.00095025427,0.0002212837,0.0000063342122,0.000038305767,0.0000012383863,0.00027356885],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978173,0.0005681903,0.00035822153,0.0002626973,0.0008681757,0.0001253074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99225724,0.0051762653,0.0008055027,0.0001348012,0.0014512475,0.00017496858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030003649,0.0007916232,0.0018974176,0.008266003,0.00082868536,0.0020685685,0.0012368348,0.0031209842,0.0038178728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0118994815,0.00059273,0.00076205493,0.010000131,0.0017525601,0.002229396,0.0013613864,0.002693849,0.0010451737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010457483,0.000080994876,0.00059292704,0.05932544,0.00029712814,0.000489459,0.0004603981,0.00020891076,0.0005213923,0.017326575,0.21851316,0.702079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014181414,0.00003178197,0.0021052414,0.039931428,0.00027208743,0.00058487075,0.00031725323,0.00002331578,0.00013467121,0.002698084,0.95386714,0.000019948846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010618322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022103848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9893817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032517912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009320001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023593485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935216946","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006081","title":"Democracy and the Freedom of Speech: Rethinking the Conflict between Liberty and Equality","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Democracy; Value (mathematics); Constitutional law; Law and economics; Campaign finance; Law; Jurisdiction; Negative liberty; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.042061181807438126,"score_gpt":0.28640016838947147,"score_spread":0.24433898658203335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1935216946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06307115,0.015049989,0.06358075,0.28491825,0.0017940059,0.00004908065,0.00006318329,0.000112200454,0.5713614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748352,0.0018838048,0.0036766373,0.0084714405,0.0009345569,0.00007527713,0.000018404226,0.0000869605,0.010017692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98537505,0.009539302,0.00038864103,0.0013786341,0.0019015835,0.001416773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821072,0.014443999,0.00082860026,0.0013896985,0.0006561097,0.0005744398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016905773,0.00047898298,0.0007979692,0.0015498557,0.008791183,0.012825482,0.0016629795,0.005604509,0.0036041867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019590942,0.00040039327,0.00072007795,0.00086740765,0.06865049,0.015250226,0.012976645,0.011978077,0.0005639188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044931194,0.0000030856352,0.000051928815,0.000006508306,0.0000012922585,0.000013666183,0.0021159211,0.00009383977,0.000022483517,0.995061,0.0004907715,0.0021351092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014439813,0.0000096803415,0.000155947,0.00009627005,0.000005415663,0.000028505776,0.0010963639,0.0002919401,0.00016288522,0.95934635,0.038779523,0.0000126436935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004780714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005822468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016905773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007262761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062114033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089407325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1956946349","doi":"10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb03124.x","title":"Action Needed: An Affirmative Change in Affirmative Action Policies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Andrology","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University College of the North","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Action (physics); Political science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.12885247120487794,"score_gpt":0.4012905223513434,"score_spread":0.27243805114646547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1956946349","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006777402,0.0009839197,0.02153913,0.62492657,0.0068358006,0.00028964935,0.00007391082,0.00027042365,0.33830318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3863626,0.0008880417,0.03441483,0.47796354,0.0050031296,0.00084459747,0.0000707494,0.00021839126,0.094234064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9495396,0.02400964,0.0021907368,0.0049770153,0.01286244,0.0064204773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9476247,0.02856848,0.0026469752,0.006901101,0.006966406,0.00729229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050836135,0.000642129,0.0005147475,0.0012362001,0.009998738,0.020873884,0.0045284983,0.029819181,0.021576226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08548863,0.00053365674,0.0010959301,0.0009755289,0.021538513,0.023954028,0.013115573,0.019321358,0.0040852674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035121953,0.00015608796,0.00033818046,0.000054571596,0.000007466174,0.00013924198,0.0028901002,0.00023651462,0.00021681024,0.91186875,0.06221875,0.021838337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010716282,0.00013394958,0.00051434623,0.00031954487,0.000021836533,0.0001226661,0.0038681696,0.0009800058,0.0006428485,0.4867286,0.5065153,0.000045615878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005317332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007199995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050836135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008074849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031769123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2688504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967915771","doi":"10.1146/annurev-polisci-010814-104523","title":"Campaign Finance and American Democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Political Science","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Politics; Democracy; Corporate governance; Exceptionalism; Political science; Public administration; American exceptionalism; Constitutional law; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.025062616518355393,"score_gpt":0.361750234960103,"score_spread":0.3366876184417476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967915771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09918743,0.025256751,0.0025450492,0.080541104,0.0004984763,0.000020038617,0.00020772232,0.00005034638,0.791693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96564263,0.007613754,0.0003604894,0.0064604213,0.0008623915,0.000025856783,0.000103360864,0.00001206699,0.018918918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989472,0.00047236242,0.000024731899,0.00012376037,0.00021466544,0.00021724412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979734,0.00096540124,0.00044482228,0.00011236491,0.0002425497,0.00026142472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014569486,0.0001263744,0.00017967474,0.0014172993,0.0020489136,0.0036008887,0.00020354553,0.0015436918,0.008939839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034561977,0.00007822478,0.0001284382,0.0016441685,0.004515626,0.002190362,0.0017410674,0.0017304,0.0005790085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017804503,0.000048918955,0.005605239,0.0000344747,0.000006640658,0.000045834,0.0011434702,0.00026221774,0.00005588852,0.9388031,0.010898487,0.04307796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022563352,0.000039955517,0.027508827,0.00030117802,0.0000104240835,0.00010137231,0.0019274584,0.00047203575,0.000115538314,0.54345787,0.42601854,0.00002416796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047757616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059598396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008939839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020006103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015074974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02990669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971051334","doi":"10.1017/s0034670508000119","title":"The Right not to Listen - Patrick M. Garry: Rediscovering a Lost Freedom: The First Amendment Right to Censor Unwanted Speech (New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers, 2006. Pp. ix, 166. $29.95, cloth.)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"First amendment; Database transaction; Law; Free speech; Sociology; Political science; Art; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.02086288196524164,"score_gpt":0.27457146085921597,"score_spread":0.2537085788939743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971051334","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013372733,0.5373931,0.0015318395,0.30971518,0.0054884045,0.000037710997,0.00016984304,0.00006799999,0.14425872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08428992,0.40664038,0.0022677332,0.17673565,0.005960581,0.000151634,0.00025492528,0.00018546067,0.3235137],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996887,0.001331193,0.00012761347,0.00032097544,0.0009518727,0.00038126958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980742,0.001088195,0.00023404969,0.000120787,0.00023764657,0.00024515964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003425306,0.0007685075,0.0005585715,0.001035802,0.003642268,0.0068970704,0.0015438462,0.009208957,0.018919177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052338913,0.00057173026,0.00041237706,0.00157809,0.009964524,0.012001569,0.0035334025,0.0085572265,0.008972042],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026527368,0.000017887745,0.00019774857,0.00024255781,0.0000083912555,0.00011934372,0.0024640176,0.00006742355,0.00016444761,0.1276448,0.84033865,0.028708197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014741724,0.000013476221,0.0010265039,0.0010284985,0.000009213564,0.00025225483,0.0026881367,0.00004201193,0.00019250493,0.065027565,0.9296662,0.000038857797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03592616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077285156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03592616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049115075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006326934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07143408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983004278","doi":"10.2105/ajph.92.3.360","title":"Expressive Freedom and Tobacco Advertising: A Canadian Perspective","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Public Health","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Australian Government; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation","keywords":"Tobacco control; Constitutionality; Legislation; Supreme court; Law; Government (linguistics); Tobacco industry; Politics; Power (physics); Perspective (graphical); Freedom of the press; Advertising; Political science; Business; Public health; Medicine","score_opus":0.043184699297198245,"score_gpt":0.30808246659844035,"score_spread":0.2648977673012421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983004278","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009325238,0.047918763,0.0015938691,0.12905025,0.0005728622,0.000042237054,0.0002343619,0.000031298026,0.81123114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72151726,0.10736664,0.0034970338,0.04659328,0.0012629437,0.00009979943,0.00023469949,0.00011897575,0.119309366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993614,0.00091065903,0.00013560719,0.0006493923,0.0025806825,0.0021097618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618477,0.0014510673,0.0002016615,0.00015494827,0.001353353,0.00065427925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036369958,0.00087825913,0.0009681184,0.006500798,0.02575528,0.017413741,0.002860421,0.008697618,0.016537426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005265288,0.00063422247,0.0010515227,0.0063775,0.045017797,0.007073776,0.0040656463,0.010428214,0.00076746533],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010156573,0.00001104107,0.0002165687,0.000043436557,0.0000041288677,0.000097426,0.0025518981,0.00013875976,0.000066648245,0.98592687,0.006055425,0.0048776898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005840545,0.000022815804,0.0048039714,0.0008473313,0.000060561782,0.00025537022,0.009789228,0.0007361784,0.00029126654,0.339058,0.64389664,0.00018021003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9871078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98822486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1794564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1794564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13536033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9517143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991352347","doi":"10.1089/elj.2005.4.282","title":"Divergent Disclosure: The Value of Uniformity in State Campaign Finance Disclosure Laws","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Stuart Olson (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Politics; Corporate governance; Value (mathematics); Economics; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.010146780210504101,"score_gpt":0.2803441252298888,"score_spread":0.2701973450193847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991352347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66327846,0.0018428063,0.07364557,0.04927661,0.00047306827,0.0002619313,0.00049139553,0.0002683298,0.21046187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99548125,0.000082509156,0.0018876703,0.0013319732,0.00014872936,0.000039525967,0.000034527144,0.000016798454,0.0009769863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9538478,0.025009563,0.002421945,0.005334218,0.009894294,0.0034921838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.630595,0.28640124,0.021951012,0.043935414,0.013817029,0.0033002705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050190806,0.00031432524,0.0014220929,0.0017827157,0.004990855,0.010671498,0.0030490074,0.0063863387,0.004769551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26616952,0.0007821755,0.0008681969,0.0017425565,0.01526687,0.011634052,0.0067558507,0.01174003,0.000388379],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041568922,0.00013508587,0.012692577,0.000058743546,0.000091456335,0.00009470547,0.001989013,0.004518648,0.00040463914,0.95049876,0.0025764005,0.02652429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025777833,0.00019048322,0.014766103,0.00015424771,0.00022198455,0.00013170752,0.0010913518,0.018813284,0.0018118855,0.9541941,0.008272423,0.00009450678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040286668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043702135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050190806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042915526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004520022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26543754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009661012","doi":"10.1089/153312904323216186","title":"Improving the U. S. Electoral System: Lessons from Canada and Mexico","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Election law; Political science; Politics; Bureaucracy; Voting; Local election; Administration (probate law); Public administration; General election; Law","score_opus":0.012390732534815518,"score_gpt":0.2702704301497055,"score_spread":0.25787969761488994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009661012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6405655,0.006185224,0.0011572253,0.18408844,0.00029538103,0.00031495639,0.0018475803,0.00011072486,0.16543487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719819,0.003888292,0.0020174568,0.0061455984,0.00008718373,0.000095497155,0.0006136696,0.000051603,0.015118797],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956814,0.0008987766,0.000074596624,0.00021742305,0.000633992,0.0024938437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924751,0.0012001088,0.0002840476,0.0002988367,0.0039332267,0.0018087279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057589496,0.00032023262,0.0007031005,0.0019083585,0.0201135,0.008198344,0.0024850175,0.0025782823,0.006103674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018592987,0.00026626684,0.00036659863,0.0046287137,0.0041997223,0.002583385,0.0037147438,0.003217764,0.00035327187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071741093,0.0006035404,0.27446532,0.00054194476,0.0002588823,0.0009323897,0.042942815,0.009364497,0.00079487654,0.24143746,0.17307729,0.2548635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051590457,0.00032842185,0.45041737,0.00091155514,0.00044600348,0.00016939454,0.11879982,0.004636089,0.0012915764,0.030782716,0.3915231,0.00017813737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99759054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08617074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08617074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16236292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6252154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026023157","doi":"10.1177/001452460111300105","title":"What's Wrong with Spong?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Expository Times","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.012932869164829438,"score_gpt":0.24986070566169308,"score_spread":0.23692783649686364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026023157","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007889237,0.010738227,0.00435234,0.731783,0.008103903,0.000010258537,0.000060480048,0.00010253153,0.23696005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56437486,0.014464728,0.006039569,0.25324735,0.011609842,0.00016175708,0.00008822243,0.0005918865,0.1494218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957867,0.0028274448,0.0001257139,0.00028807664,0.0005784312,0.00039354348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893829,0.007526927,0.00044911314,0.0011665929,0.0008593767,0.00061500486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006747325,0.00041191798,0.0007141097,0.000905268,0.0063379304,0.008584994,0.0010586274,0.004131925,0.012355543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024172543,0.00023957515,0.00047697962,0.001054813,0.040698092,0.012787676,0.00262648,0.009862462,0.0021534746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010202907,0.000009633038,0.00013728406,0.000040040853,0.0000052441487,0.00003799867,0.003413709,0.000032961154,0.00002404733,0.9477676,0.044392392,0.004128956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016275715,0.000008557866,0.00021549576,0.00017901383,0.000009211041,0.000084035906,0.0051396973,0.00008980408,0.000096790434,0.78819793,0.2059483,0.000014920573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010721944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016021742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012355543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039113886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031158645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041333377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034503436","doi":"10.1115/fedsm2003-45710","title":"Calvin W. Rice Lecture 2002: Two-Phase Oxymoron","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oxymoron; First amendment; sort; Free speech; Law; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Supreme court; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.020025879021803646,"score_gpt":0.3155393538812543,"score_spread":0.2955134748594507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034503436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011057281,0.026634756,0.0024485781,0.4049397,0.12095661,0.00009823442,0.00021684893,0.0002526032,0.4433469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012945841,0.0075983857,0.0008849319,0.03453037,0.014682002,0.000078346806,0.00009520109,0.00019434157,0.92899066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840516,0.0003422054,0.00004355548,0.00029283305,0.0005702178,0.00034601756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982078,0.00031547024,0.00005800452,0.00011711392,0.00054603163,0.00075553707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00356594,0.0008493075,0.00036843595,0.00078483345,0.0048499918,0.006258774,0.0012006749,0.006818234,0.07075639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063117556,0.00038519598,0.00057064765,0.00053728867,0.0021622735,0.0038979168,0.00327005,0.009717832,0.033827122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015395644,0.000017890881,0.000023619074,0.000015224872,0.0000011749559,0.000024554025,0.00007838816,0.000029179238,0.000050559534,0.021680553,0.9671002,0.010963305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056967137,0.000005940532,0.000097232485,0.000067937115,0.0000014930059,0.000022323326,0.00010207813,0.000041280087,0.000056096702,0.0043431516,0.99525213,0.000004620252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010058098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019384833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07075639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007240293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007509945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2367037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039599175","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1481289","title":"The Right to Pass Freely: Circulation, Begging and the Mobile Self","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Begging; Circulation (fluid dynamics); Business; Political science; Law; Mechanics; Physics","score_opus":0.0039923519420405965,"score_gpt":0.2404815077640867,"score_spread":0.2364891558220461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039599175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103013106,0.0033527203,0.013244955,0.03969048,0.00035300583,0.000040228326,0.00009312894,0.000049804614,0.8401626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640012,0.0006139162,0.00086854876,0.0022971386,0.00019864099,0.00005121118,0.000024530067,0.0000362809,0.03190851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722797,0.0013332756,0.00009130904,0.00037910737,0.00038026428,0.00058805954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994802,0.0035260802,0.00038214598,0.00065020414,0.0002786584,0.00036100822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042769657,0.00027487078,0.0005079594,0.00085490214,0.0066913296,0.012725696,0.0011746964,0.008593079,0.011811873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008461646,0.00032041647,0.00036346688,0.0010768136,0.045388166,0.014600741,0.005858078,0.007182851,0.0011390195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008544034,0.0000052873575,0.00006797086,0.0000047367007,7.025842e-7,0.000028014834,0.003297709,0.00002393954,0.000026806181,0.9943857,0.00070985296,0.0014407578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029335482,0.00001680673,0.00025947337,0.00010355261,0.0000069561893,0.0001534041,0.005184991,0.000222606,0.00012789627,0.9482969,0.045577873,0.000020093186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068171653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005126683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012725696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022767738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029733968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03951466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W206675796","doi":"","title":"Detect, Disrupt, and Detain: Local Law Enforcement's Critical Roles in Combating Homegrown Extremism and the Evolving Terrorist Threat","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Radicalization; Law enforcement; Law; Statute; Political science; Al qaeda; Homeland security; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.012474539918975576,"score_gpt":0.27265163670737125,"score_spread":0.2601770967883957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W206675796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40034655,0.020785663,0.0072116437,0.18582152,0.0015831322,0.0005415745,0.00023367509,0.0005687827,0.38290745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94678384,0.0053625726,0.0019204705,0.0063551716,0.00034012983,0.00011485181,0.00007297014,0.0000472801,0.039002735],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841285,0.00079499115,0.000048490587,0.000112502334,0.00026904567,0.0003621355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977581,0.0009125892,0.00041528666,0.00010274469,0.0003485993,0.0004626782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024101841,0.00032756338,0.00018426853,0.0009574627,0.0076914276,0.00782254,0.0009611177,0.0020799767,0.012543367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046874452,0.00026833467,0.00020697685,0.0009679045,0.0050687753,0.003015963,0.00370041,0.0021010293,0.0015520176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014374118,0.00039700573,0.03642734,0.0012547639,0.000027123675,0.007599726,0.28025702,0.001109922,0.002277273,0.08088199,0.23748289,0.35214114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015171943,0.00020178813,0.03814317,0.0018526446,0.000024409788,0.0021535628,0.6097512,0.000887277,0.000875774,0.008393522,0.3376232,0.00007826948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02015075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03298723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02015075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044937036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004475179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04196179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094230622","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgen.1000297","title":"Taken to School: An Interview with the Honorable Judge John E. Jones, III","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Genetics","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Mile; State (computer science); Library science; Gerontology; History; Archaeology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.06940914835400142,"score_gpt":0.2693723740495148,"score_spread":0.1999632256955134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094230622","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040163647,0.0035047298,0.0007333789,0.9217396,0.004369538,0.00011636797,0.00007992356,0.00004398931,0.02924885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20212847,0.0035478738,0.0009618828,0.7381588,0.0012569856,0.00027065512,0.000052461975,0.0001579288,0.053464916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892314,0.0048952005,0.0003681523,0.0010034305,0.0019935956,0.002508222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878484,0.003419096,0.00086352293,0.000284,0.0021036926,0.005481319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008144264,0.0006909354,0.0014388676,0.0010380821,0.046325836,0.009213596,0.0030093489,0.013878736,0.0054482957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026553033,0.0013437592,0.0007409917,0.0014515711,0.012305062,0.007769214,0.00595697,0.044905912,0.0019221487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034152526,0.00020185969,0.0044994815,0.000083438994,0.000019962168,0.005765727,0.36249244,0.00010204359,0.00048757868,0.014460091,0.60192126,0.009931937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011018219,0.000058003352,0.0026017397,0.0002910415,0.000010304899,0.0013970851,0.4962507,0.000118018266,0.00018342154,0.0027560266,0.4962507,0.000071987175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.113889754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17869449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113889754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01079303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015018761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22645366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125505034","doi":"10.7202/1022310ar","title":"Freedom of the Press as a Discrete Constitutional Guarantee","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of the press; Meaning (existential); Charter; Context (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Freedom of information; Supreme court; Section (typography); Scope (computer science); State (computer science); Originalism; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.019057966154315636,"score_gpt":0.26755384469360893,"score_spread":0.2484958785392933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125505034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048987415,0.0014248091,0.24021131,0.03696351,0.00059328723,0.00024147601,0.000576389,0.0003378889,0.67066383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9474647,0.0005345163,0.024553211,0.0024461849,0.0005035621,0.0002793669,0.00013760255,0.00007199411,0.024008969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99046993,0.0031167166,0.0005001884,0.0019263126,0.0029166394,0.0010702399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98654515,0.0071569807,0.000941379,0.0034657384,0.00124863,0.0006420666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009658314,0.0004723359,0.00071550347,0.0018696685,0.0050193775,0.014144777,0.00212689,0.005486193,0.006480712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014874155,0.00062615535,0.0010799571,0.0011634346,0.04951855,0.011610291,0.0058855335,0.009189785,0.0010574457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025866814,0.0000024314252,0.000024694258,0.0000048322436,8.293242e-7,0.000008596876,0.00021066969,0.00012327293,0.000054432472,0.9987062,0.0001707844,0.0006907073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002795099,0.000022943603,0.00021932635,0.00006301953,0.000013482679,0.000040205538,0.0003061923,0.00083289255,0.00041423686,0.97150695,0.02653074,0.000022092017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009994349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008494411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014144777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064620688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011327091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051078677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135545778","doi":"","title":"Dignity and Speech: The Regulation of Hate Speech in a Democracy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Democracy; Political science; Human rights; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.019927556048057328,"score_gpt":0.270995201432523,"score_spread":0.25106764538446563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135545778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08533397,0.012677188,0.026528575,0.14048256,0.001526463,0.00007358948,0.000052607524,0.00008719478,0.7332378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94321895,0.0025241903,0.0025246404,0.009961388,0.00053544005,0.000081651364,0.000019606232,0.000041338073,0.041092727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956567,0.0022249052,0.00018057747,0.0004699938,0.00087676244,0.0005910707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952311,0.0027215146,0.0005512484,0.00041128809,0.0005444501,0.0005404213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064996956,0.0003225146,0.00026212784,0.0007721625,0.0064116963,0.0109662935,0.0011133723,0.0048805587,0.0044807675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007602764,0.00025438258,0.00041260986,0.0005663659,0.034743164,0.0068242974,0.007532547,0.005334603,0.00060721353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003009305,0.00003294237,0.00073130714,0.000049715174,0.000005983521,0.0002600483,0.016186068,0.0002695313,0.0005590774,0.9589179,0.0037085486,0.0192488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003377291,0.00007785743,0.002305906,0.00034595435,0.000020357333,0.00031603794,0.010280187,0.00070180674,0.0013813393,0.82451695,0.15998198,0.000037936723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049850927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067300685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0109662935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060072215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059425086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043585658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152997450","doi":"10.3390/laws3030388","title":"“Jones-ing” for a Solution: Commercial Street Surveillance and Privacy Torts in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Plaintiff; Tort; Embarrassment; Business; Privacy laws of the United States; Internet privacy; Liability; Trespass; Harm; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Information privacy; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.017919389721575654,"score_gpt":0.2531406261097571,"score_spread":0.2352212363881815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152997450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45704406,0.009655946,0.0040075583,0.15784252,0.0005392214,0.00026130409,0.0008899215,0.00008225026,0.3696772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95005745,0.003758612,0.0011600744,0.009721449,0.000075380965,0.00003509059,0.00013675659,0.000026769498,0.035028473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99365616,0.00060711056,0.00014173755,0.00043173108,0.0021786797,0.0029845778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99457043,0.0015051595,0.0004968812,0.0002188784,0.0018393823,0.001369247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024217407,0.0003497339,0.00046700452,0.002317601,0.028331608,0.009213478,0.002365802,0.0051214322,0.0057779755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008981095,0.0005426027,0.00080246624,0.0039307466,0.011031125,0.0028388288,0.0040552043,0.006329984,0.00019440842],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007164901,0.000100276404,0.029077657,0.00010263247,0.000058568967,0.0020655934,0.01965647,0.0018397304,0.00040135244,0.8805722,0.0420382,0.024015738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020425061,0.00013248435,0.2363092,0.0011779271,0.0005526486,0.0018731616,0.10704462,0.014999112,0.0015621693,0.1323629,0.5030837,0.0006977687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99809486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18149039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18149039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23073888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9493551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2186769447","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v8n4p208","title":"Academic Freedom in the Heartland: Rights Consciousness and the United States Supreme Court","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Supreme court; Law; Academic freedom; Politics; State (computer science); Officer; Doctrine; Public administration; Corporate governance; Higher education; Management","score_opus":0.030401795988019325,"score_gpt":0.2989881768746177,"score_spread":0.26858638088659836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2186769447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12100902,0.010610074,0.0045746593,0.30700725,0.0012978443,0.000047113055,0.00018644452,0.00007748319,0.55519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93420285,0.0011260298,0.00078385684,0.03866513,0.000556018,0.000059621452,0.000041356507,0.00003311826,0.024531962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99319273,0.0022815831,0.00019023422,0.0010199994,0.0012098142,0.002105664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99100375,0.0062184473,0.0004945652,0.0005007692,0.00087044376,0.0009120133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01179062,0.0003132483,0.00056932506,0.001454344,0.023509448,0.023712466,0.0016066969,0.017060656,0.0053041964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015223245,0.0005180751,0.00051975896,0.0013989479,0.035891913,0.010822098,0.0067678597,0.018749114,0.00063411705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008599547,0.00000952625,0.00024824438,0.000004974511,0.0000020400948,0.000061360646,0.0034972786,0.000044037504,0.000031907646,0.9883366,0.0060594906,0.0016959128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007290438,0.000029617775,0.00185807,0.00033392862,0.000029348215,0.00011704442,0.010844815,0.00070227793,0.00045720462,0.75920284,0.22627829,0.000073765725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07091805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08072768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07091805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014488409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014283485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14101052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203332058","doi":"10.4324/9780203517451-30","title":"Internet surveillance and popular constitutionalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; The Internet; Electronic surveillance; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer security; Business; Law and economics; Computer science; Law; Democracy; Sociology; Politics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.010882562194835816,"score_gpt":0.2470510430285132,"score_spread":0.23616848083367736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203332058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23274083,0.004525036,0.004845686,0.077256024,0.0002486682,0.000032432366,0.00021233986,0.00004743205,0.68009156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933822,0.0004401937,0.00019630043,0.0011155609,0.00025243746,0.000015054629,0.000023283246,0.000010663589,0.0045642895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952003,0.0025073895,0.00015565255,0.00077637756,0.00062813185,0.0007321512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97095764,0.022839807,0.0024913445,0.0020828024,0.0009792818,0.00064901874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007161829,0.00016931725,0.0004229901,0.0025740871,0.0041065346,0.011845192,0.0008539171,0.0048224023,0.012675323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022767494,0.00022896816,0.00036305306,0.0024782657,0.023565652,0.0076619512,0.0030511285,0.0055399467,0.0004912461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015938866,0.00002204898,0.0013551618,0.000012901313,0.0000046668497,0.00003753431,0.0020716984,0.000115051655,0.000051095754,0.9906618,0.0015075391,0.0041445843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003792437,0.000023711014,0.0052445494,0.00012392644,0.000022983937,0.00008456443,0.004587602,0.0011313658,0.00034076703,0.9437931,0.044586238,0.000023114308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004813022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044186255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012675323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003371991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019072291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04240316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217014079","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1446","title":"Using the Charter to Stop Racial Profiling: The Development of an Equality-Based Conception of Arbitrary Detention","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Racial profiling; Charter; Criminology; Rationality; Reasonable suspicion; Profiling (computer programming); Law; Racism; Offensive; Political science; Pretext; Sociology; Race (biology); Politics; Gender studies; Operations research; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.1401032799816692,"score_gpt":0.3488697523661616,"score_spread":0.2087664723844924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217014079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04486694,0.00722073,0.32223904,0.14048468,0.0032731853,0.00029621142,0.00011053612,0.00027203673,0.48123658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.876251,0.002685454,0.07186788,0.0118984785,0.00091966975,0.00027416323,0.000053020078,0.00013147648,0.03591884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762117,0.0129390685,0.000976063,0.002115105,0.005670894,0.0020872063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98500305,0.007476222,0.001783654,0.0016825959,0.0033000105,0.00075452385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027096504,0.0005339592,0.0006293317,0.002726791,0.008847941,0.013294402,0.0027027864,0.0057959585,0.0017448098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027425338,0.00049959746,0.0006909338,0.0012635352,0.06734638,0.013027564,0.0058845603,0.010764563,0.0004547505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027127624,0.0000048322045,0.00015791926,0.0000057176157,6.926564e-7,0.00001647824,0.0025479498,0.00023595178,0.00002389316,0.99256426,0.0010710919,0.0033685153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016815078,0.00005832636,0.0009720913,0.00032588627,0.000016307124,0.00010641756,0.004246169,0.002869895,0.0006333353,0.8188333,0.17184363,0.00007780717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0667896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052679077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9332104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017001145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029246787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14330173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222453259","doi":"","title":"Privacy: Rights, Remedies and Reform","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy policy; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Business; Privacy law; Privacy rights; Law; Political science; Information privacy; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.021083310286950634,"score_gpt":0.2752961108943113,"score_spread":0.2542128006073606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222453259","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033247296,0.034313936,0.03206784,0.5936162,0.0023672325,0.00013265597,0.00027818006,0.00011208658,0.30386457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9311846,0.010757974,0.0066927,0.021940863,0.004862676,0.00020088835,0.00006991597,0.00005611705,0.024234246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98076415,0.010747804,0.0008917886,0.002396543,0.0033338184,0.0018657801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9676292,0.022495506,0.0018176088,0.005079579,0.0020167197,0.0009614206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023995636,0.00062868936,0.0012384275,0.0020971848,0.0073841307,0.015917907,0.0018359273,0.015313284,0.006640868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05188612,0.00066588575,0.0009810551,0.0019449892,0.075298846,0.021889577,0.0068004425,0.01614682,0.0007468979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005076362,0.000009364914,0.00006946295,0.000014240282,0.0000027585756,0.00001038331,0.00017160286,0.00007430209,0.000014002297,0.99619496,0.0016022763,0.0018316362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015023875,0.00000669088,0.00012688097,0.0000795944,0.000005538593,0.00002242769,0.00035257087,0.00025294514,0.00006154926,0.98681575,0.012249909,0.00001110841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010472772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071330527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023995636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008339437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012535597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12690258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230790418","doi":"","title":"Criminal Responses to Hate Motivated Violence: Is Bill C-41 Tough Enough?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Redress; Denunciation; Hate crime; Political science; Law; Criminology; Parliament; Criminal law; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025703333445925805,"score_gpt":0.2875243057062493,"score_spread":0.2618209722603235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230790418","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06455023,0.0034350995,0.0015602085,0.6615478,0.0032368572,0.0001270304,0.00012625527,0.00009368868,0.26532283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42052266,0.002127543,0.0014212523,0.5137683,0.002344372,0.00030470564,0.00014736006,0.00009023356,0.059273485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98338115,0.0030788477,0.0008850142,0.0012368562,0.004569094,0.006848957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976595,0.011213347,0.0033420061,0.0010874913,0.0029964978,0.004765607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009614041,0.0004974982,0.0008220796,0.0017361679,0.014335933,0.017063942,0.0029538162,0.038968444,0.006123701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044526257,0.00078712194,0.0009894331,0.0014797752,0.015185818,0.005636229,0.0060782456,0.017346265,0.0016995029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006229073,0.00015359987,0.007550021,0.00011296576,0.00002328112,0.0015072823,0.0088873785,0.00031648268,0.0007382349,0.6756556,0.27600324,0.02898962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001304509,0.00022511798,0.057321165,0.0022832009,0.00010978513,0.0016585749,0.032776255,0.001699817,0.0016056369,0.21823743,0.6834655,0.0004870324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05928682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06569409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94071317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008336197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016971923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1178835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237729157","doi":"","title":"Protecting the Social Value of Privacy in the Context of State Investigations Using New Technologies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Information privacy; Privacy by Design; Privacy policy; Personally identifiable information; Charter; Right to privacy; Internet privacy; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); The Right to Privacy; Value (mathematics); Privacy law; Agency (philosophy); Privacy laws of the United States; Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; Sociology; Politics; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.03627339416166526,"score_gpt":0.31815257096799343,"score_spread":0.2818791768063282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237729157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1637274,0.0036908768,0.065980226,0.20337795,0.00057529967,0.00024793332,0.00007677789,0.00009624633,0.56222725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98256046,0.00080344005,0.004765962,0.005945114,0.0003980747,0.00013621816,0.000013186239,0.00001957183,0.0053578867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95838076,0.029583635,0.0012597237,0.0027924238,0.004554774,0.0034287476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9340983,0.05076238,0.004605055,0.005918742,0.003161186,0.0014544124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043241385,0.0003836674,0.00096286414,0.0022817717,0.016688686,0.018924631,0.001774235,0.015346329,0.002007798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043734945,0.0005801572,0.0011102632,0.0013615717,0.06569823,0.015508976,0.011837917,0.0107406685,0.00032652606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006673835,0.0000112825055,0.00031211696,0.0000111314675,0.0000055257374,0.00016885882,0.005269783,0.00023215853,0.00012214939,0.99171716,0.0005252966,0.0016179681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016509111,0.000023721257,0.00041292838,0.00013650746,0.000023635808,0.00014439224,0.0038383757,0.0008347657,0.0004610111,0.96624535,0.027832843,0.00002991142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054567046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057691038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043241385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007142052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013489244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22868502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249755711","doi":"","title":"Paternalistic Manipulation through Pictorial Warnings: The First Amendment, Commercial Speech, and the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commercial speech; Scrutiny; Tobacco control; Supreme court; Tobacco product; Business; Advertising; Smokeless tobacco; Paternalism; Law; Surgeon general; Political science; First amendment; Medicine; Environmental health; Public health","score_opus":0.020932283346236185,"score_gpt":0.2777290049857116,"score_spread":0.2567967216394754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249755711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094281405,0.0075589633,0.022247646,0.22721235,0.0016142391,0.00022377403,0.00033835674,0.00022823556,0.64629513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8568203,0.0025109372,0.008515358,0.08868369,0.0010222377,0.00035787013,0.00011008494,0.000065216955,0.04191446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98085886,0.007927495,0.0010293972,0.0014581005,0.006844406,0.0018818249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9720648,0.02029394,0.0029980326,0.0020510121,0.001950234,0.0006420315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015315709,0.00043472913,0.00038849973,0.0010737972,0.006217658,0.009291901,0.0015777805,0.017139928,0.0038454032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04257087,0.00054003834,0.0007807334,0.001041373,0.016072804,0.006493759,0.0035096086,0.010997248,0.0008249686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033451888,0.00004694723,0.00079709763,0.00003321639,0.000006000019,0.00019347024,0.0030005635,0.00015648895,0.00039374467,0.9729215,0.012804132,0.009613439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002228201,0.00029969754,0.009901911,0.0011114411,0.0001788628,0.0013535321,0.0038750435,0.0040849964,0.0039756596,0.5763088,0.39841157,0.00027563458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021347873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025015404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021347873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004779083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0111493375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08099818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253597620","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2696120","title":"Balancing Transparency and Accountability with Privacy in Improving the Police Handling of Sexual Assaults","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Sexual assault; Transparency (behavior); Business; Computer security; Internet privacy; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency; Poison control; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.020566123869484133,"score_gpt":0.27584500876981344,"score_spread":0.2552788849003293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253597620","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3769777,0.005417164,0.076057345,0.38942853,0.0016890288,0.000580971,0.0001904893,0.00035649553,0.14930233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916637,0.00042627065,0.0036355346,0.00299508,0.00031013065,0.000059842016,0.000014669099,0.000023841041,0.0008708631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8187032,0.1330472,0.007664816,0.004061235,0.025648452,0.0108751785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.51360023,0.37396848,0.057231702,0.01653696,0.03020283,0.008459771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12241659,0.0005982895,0.0008328953,0.0041161347,0.008306927,0.016937297,0.0024788042,0.0058831293,0.0045803883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37837037,0.00086095894,0.00090868573,0.0026966534,0.01213005,0.01790576,0.011654,0.010614356,0.0005258166],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072494685,0.0009812742,0.108017534,0.00090273854,0.00043959956,0.00050344324,0.044214405,0.02193269,0.0017868906,0.4411094,0.020502541,0.3588845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028222153,0.00096666004,0.09065984,0.0035390765,0.0006654727,0.00063899666,0.04113268,0.045607995,0.0069611003,0.7598369,0.049166605,0.0005423955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014761726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015776718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12241659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010667598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6474086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254418222","doi":"","title":"Finding Life in Hurricane Shelby: Reviving the Voting Rights Act by Reforming Section 3 Preclearance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Election law; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Voter registration; Economic Justice; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.015299245489500908,"score_gpt":0.23370257875210895,"score_spread":0.21840333326260805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254418222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118619405,0.0043282053,0.003316718,0.33983213,0.0035874448,0.00018298035,0.00017804731,0.0003279864,0.5296271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56419414,0.001520232,0.0023658269,0.22365147,0.0008269608,0.00010685875,0.00019993966,0.00010253539,0.20703204],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467385,0.0008000751,0.00011918203,0.00032051431,0.0019077837,0.002178593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941559,0.0021887848,0.00026772512,0.0003975284,0.0012678241,0.0017222422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063702487,0.00024896176,0.00025585416,0.00067660265,0.015622824,0.0065730615,0.0031493127,0.008534823,0.0061959284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01320468,0.00040678983,0.00024566747,0.00052442314,0.010333618,0.00183584,0.0050315806,0.010198647,0.0012962512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000799866,0.00012876042,0.010518822,0.000057944897,0.000017192991,0.0015412567,0.025637183,0.00062142534,0.0013969688,0.3986409,0.48647028,0.074889265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004008631,0.000054605523,0.011681368,0.00030533553,0.000029465868,0.0002735468,0.015096809,0.000679334,0.0009859181,0.020256428,0.95051634,0.00008074114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7222186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8961764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7222186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01546751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058916893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5588347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258841679","doi":"10.55016/ojs/ajer.v61i2.55886","title":"A Storm Over This Court: Law, Politics, and Supreme Court Decision Making in Brown v. Board of Education (2013) by Jeffrey D. Hockett","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Journal of Educational Research","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Politics; Storm; Political science; Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.043220612622053275,"score_gpt":0.3930293254414115,"score_spread":0.3498087128193582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258841679","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06140086,0.017472157,0.0024461371,0.6647947,0.0029421889,0.00008400393,0.00015310418,0.000037194168,0.25066963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7866532,0.0048248325,0.0009939747,0.1504438,0.0026519555,0.00016096402,0.000080644386,0.000097205964,0.054093417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782079,0.010405234,0.00041274872,0.002110658,0.003333505,0.005529921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876671,0.008955538,0.00062120135,0.00020733061,0.0010804381,0.0014683746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020452518,0.0005087155,0.00078060024,0.0015019288,0.04330663,0.03306393,0.0033897867,0.024914348,0.0071656685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030062258,0.0011007965,0.00093881163,0.0020585211,0.03710523,0.011938438,0.00873033,0.03064015,0.0010045135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040587816,0.00007996008,0.0013952822,0.000026950456,0.000015669082,0.00080869766,0.018170536,0.0002533975,0.00017843845,0.85771,0.114792526,0.006527979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000123198,0.00004814487,0.004257142,0.000831169,0.00005877007,0.00022937509,0.046671737,0.001030105,0.0006770994,0.6109438,0.3349131,0.00021636277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20913766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2856621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20913766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032680925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035812926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41584074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259420773","doi":"","title":"Should the Charter Apply to Universities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Scrutiny; Political science; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Autonomy; Constitutional law; Academic freedom; Public administration; Higher education","score_opus":0.03378054235150256,"score_gpt":0.28830597299168714,"score_spread":0.25452543064018457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259420773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0863212,0.0024065012,0.011501432,0.2016936,0.002127121,0.00035439307,0.0003193234,0.0002630385,0.69501346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89359635,0.0009875831,0.0031679438,0.040230222,0.000924813,0.00011950273,0.00011560122,0.0000826856,0.060775295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9671875,0.005469557,0.001060589,0.0030142425,0.011905035,0.011362935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696354,0.009698883,0.0020857872,0.004009152,0.011658649,0.0029121088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023405803,0.00031686408,0.00074131903,0.0015208966,0.015094823,0.016458085,0.0027982593,0.0141709875,0.0058183707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07020996,0.0005827039,0.0008656255,0.0016555476,0.02209111,0.0073642293,0.0048689186,0.009718733,0.0012078494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002356013,0.000028546554,0.0015631976,0.000031707852,0.000008482382,0.00013230897,0.0025789787,0.0005349236,0.0002789949,0.9689372,0.016136628,0.009745511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099718716,0.000117334996,0.010330854,0.0006017038,0.0000748535,0.00016075461,0.0065778876,0.0020072178,0.0019941214,0.4015963,0.5761621,0.0002771267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55308515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5096176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9683435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03165648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.094586596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8990936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261181044","doi":"","title":"One Step Forward or Two Steps Back? R. v. Tessling and the Privacy Consequences for Information Held by Third Parties","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Appeal; Charter; Supreme court; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.02602217499714941,"score_gpt":0.26085047916984094,"score_spread":0.23482830417269154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261181044","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023877433,0.007416991,0.0019333308,0.79865104,0.0007595092,0.000044475702,0.00024175567,0.00006082807,0.16701469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65370846,0.0058887103,0.0021607461,0.28063345,0.00071794004,0.00007182834,0.00012727307,0.00005620381,0.05663539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902001,0.0014628087,0.00023845493,0.00097401836,0.0034200363,0.0037046317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948591,0.0020587542,0.0004037006,0.000405879,0.0016136062,0.00065898884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00495145,0.0004486961,0.0005615684,0.0009342422,0.011979517,0.010664105,0.0025742804,0.018588725,0.006628388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012573174,0.00046567162,0.0011860778,0.0011495808,0.024703443,0.009271516,0.0029383712,0.015332451,0.0010680498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053684344,0.000020754103,0.0014313722,0.000072346695,0.000020885047,0.00074579904,0.0044304077,0.00017017235,0.000359495,0.89569247,0.08560428,0.011398267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018409415,0.00007674816,0.0058023236,0.0010374003,0.00015002533,0.0007556521,0.026161851,0.000943219,0.0018424408,0.5612463,0.40147832,0.0003216723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8054388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8414566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8054388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03979417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05259522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39141393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263593527","doi":"","title":"Perlustration in the Pathless Woods: Hamed v R","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law enforcement; Enforcement; Computer security; Law; Political science; Business; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.032470548737644774,"score_gpt":0.2664523431612441,"score_spread":0.23398179442359934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263593527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109896295,0.0030387868,0.006424979,0.051088106,0.0019532938,0.000052430994,0.00012234352,0.00022859154,0.82719517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85402685,0.0012062346,0.0029852358,0.009863344,0.00021251688,0.00003188691,0.000060102324,0.00008350328,0.13153031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991824,0.00031063714,0.00001629096,0.00011987191,0.00012723236,0.0002435182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992773,0.00015157385,0.0000860123,0.00011514428,0.00014961921,0.00022034861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014150154,0.00020542408,0.00018365528,0.00041954112,0.0071160025,0.0048976145,0.0006536268,0.0022828782,0.024006113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026500558,0.00014187908,0.00025480593,0.00033633003,0.0058971457,0.003765006,0.0037603462,0.0026198842,0.0028923962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001137819,0.00008499234,0.0059332973,0.00007889217,0.000016933616,0.0026591446,0.017902894,0.00062595174,0.0007238272,0.73270786,0.14647585,0.092676565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024034165,0.000083432475,0.0065736347,0.0003707963,0.000015091735,0.001316469,0.037472162,0.0012325564,0.00079982926,0.11947774,0.8325842,0.000049988663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018885138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05658805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024006113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022333646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026315777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08030838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265870395","doi":"","title":"Catalyzing More Adequate Federal Habeas Review of Summation Misconduct: Persuasion Theory and the Sixth Amendment Right to an Unbiased Jury","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Oklahoma College of Law - Digital Commons (University of Oklahoma)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Habeas corpus; Scrutiny; Law; Political science; Jury; Misconduct; Persuasion; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Social psychology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.01588964028428263,"score_gpt":0.22855108135588803,"score_spread":0.2126614410716054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265870395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36193264,0.0028425676,0.14087553,0.1523883,0.0010620279,0.0005122026,0.000050566494,0.00034775859,0.3399884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801083,0.000163879,0.01204041,0.0036332873,0.00022225181,0.00011709926,0.0000070568385,0.000017164095,0.003690477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9591285,0.022714956,0.0020401925,0.0037516297,0.00917344,0.0031911987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85791796,0.10189618,0.01747605,0.007428028,0.012516211,0.0027655405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052075095,0.0003298746,0.0007667873,0.0034896736,0.0045373184,0.008394862,0.0014704843,0.007552993,0.0039503365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1446699,0.0004723933,0.0006771959,0.000817313,0.0140313255,0.00730552,0.005797844,0.005430625,0.0005121927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007026499,0.00014568065,0.0052630114,0.00010313944,0.000040927713,0.00023886122,0.0054575154,0.001341721,0.0010549851,0.94459075,0.003244789,0.0384484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018963499,0.00025705466,0.010674875,0.0003709924,0.000089789675,0.00026870848,0.0031632488,0.009489456,0.0041370844,0.93940085,0.031837396,0.00012106916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034759503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005238429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052075095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047033094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012380782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27540278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267362154","doi":"","title":"Mind your Metaphors: An Examination of the Inefficacy Argument as a Reason Against Regulating On-line Conduct","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Excuse; Normative; Realm; Accountability; Epistemology; Metaphor; Morality; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03304993472332848,"score_gpt":0.30493385290046476,"score_spread":0.2718839181771363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267362154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047829945,0.00739515,0.063329406,0.13770361,0.0014414351,0.00014104358,0.000036791345,0.00011659372,0.74200606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92015785,0.0025563776,0.010497572,0.02429213,0.00078925904,0.00029788894,0.000024122894,0.0001662064,0.041218594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916238,0.0055616987,0.000114938455,0.000455272,0.0016214711,0.0006228257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98899686,0.009296392,0.0005164207,0.0003437198,0.000661511,0.00018517586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008409394,0.0006099211,0.0006606174,0.0023246582,0.0067103915,0.008972076,0.0018775469,0.007877009,0.004928865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01097066,0.00043499155,0.00084556325,0.0012712586,0.05597511,0.014033115,0.004131117,0.011072683,0.0005796518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025784063,0.0000059776758,0.000024667454,0.000011437556,0.0000012387668,0.00004871531,0.00416049,0.00006014505,0.00004300021,0.99319553,0.0016555806,0.0007906789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024145844,0.000034837296,0.00020602292,0.00017797977,0.000010038931,0.00017255328,0.013505136,0.0009317478,0.0003076033,0.863488,0.121120214,0.000021838721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031255851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002677338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008972076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074068834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003226251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05374098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267421889","doi":"","title":"(En)raged or (En)gaged: The Implications of Racial Context to the Canadian Provocation Defence","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Provocation test; Contextualization; Context (archaeology); Racism; Criminology; Supreme court; Law; Psychology; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); History; Medicine","score_opus":0.03249130279864126,"score_gpt":0.2450161744141586,"score_spread":0.21252487161551734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267421889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21165891,0.0046926127,0.0026600119,0.097653285,0.0011628031,0.000081146354,0.00021436362,0.00004341915,0.68183357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972647,0.0010634647,0.00055662845,0.006663851,0.000083061546,0.000021159341,0.000030034109,0.00002933613,0.018905407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928629,0.001280453,0.00012562287,0.00055592373,0.002024759,0.00315038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942444,0.0015909926,0.00045173723,0.00022402604,0.0024164757,0.0010724451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041490304,0.00044548057,0.00051846774,0.002348384,0.04542784,0.010733994,0.002384263,0.003738701,0.008112767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014905369,0.0003840672,0.00049811054,0.0029100925,0.033252813,0.003434226,0.0064738537,0.0072588013,0.0003394835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056281533,0.0000149537655,0.006515893,0.000073846175,0.000012106464,0.00044784704,0.10885839,0.00029325348,0.00028216332,0.84978133,0.017063988,0.016599951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057785695,0.000042328917,0.043680023,0.0008403509,0.00008728701,0.0003997634,0.33798364,0.00078910356,0.00070492685,0.11291064,0.5022037,0.00030037249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9901372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99543035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102908015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.102908015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15932317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74665344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268461570","doi":"","title":"The Power to Govern Men and Things’: Patriarchal Origins of the Police Power in American Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Law; State police; Legislation; State (computer science); Political science; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Sociology; Law enforcement; Business","score_opus":0.008960533000644606,"score_gpt":0.2635246320497798,"score_spread":0.2545640990491352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268461570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089387506,0.009329121,0.0094267195,0.11744134,0.000765342,0.000029046238,0.000039655904,0.000060729715,0.7735205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9613501,0.0027262259,0.0010765833,0.007372511,0.00044362628,0.000032722164,0.000014545058,0.000031403157,0.026952298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977284,0.0010721127,0.00004433713,0.00024351515,0.00046720702,0.0004444055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986486,0.000766509,0.0000967901,0.000121478886,0.00023716777,0.00012957137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023730395,0.0001985945,0.00015713512,0.0010566516,0.009445636,0.005716638,0.00063257565,0.0022931853,0.00238907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027640816,0.00033234563,0.00015619623,0.0012525783,0.03888171,0.0059762783,0.002710196,0.005842267,0.00036079175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025956692,0.0000063568045,0.00018925416,0.000005862063,8.0361787e-7,0.000043497916,0.027167961,0.000026672256,0.000034457957,0.96451735,0.0029687553,0.0050365366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008912165,0.000022892033,0.0021230113,0.00012719052,0.000005182753,0.00014215606,0.020731084,0.00038559418,0.00025227907,0.40760404,0.56857425,0.000023448583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025582932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021241065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025582932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005601161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004456462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050868034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269871599","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000515","title":"The Social Character of Freedom of Expression","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Adjudication; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Politics; Constitutional right; Freedom of expression; Law; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; State (computer science); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Human rights; Constitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.024448892214476513,"score_gpt":0.2917098771888187,"score_spread":0.2672609849743422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269871599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0135970395,0.009664119,0.0098847,0.11248604,0.00089643034,0.00004885357,0.00009028908,0.0000530257,0.85327953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8463347,0.0052098758,0.0032106622,0.016665626,0.00071843,0.000093479,0.00008447129,0.00007964951,0.12760314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923139,0.0026934696,0.00017608741,0.0008507426,0.0023873425,0.0015783682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970831,0.0013527384,0.00015540454,0.00032107686,0.00075811683,0.00032963554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045633838,0.00042348108,0.0004253249,0.0012428097,0.011659993,0.011311317,0.0009778677,0.003635669,0.005020378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057353294,0.0002628684,0.0005249012,0.001134691,0.07273056,0.006392663,0.004451111,0.004643512,0.00068220077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031632212,0.0000017453348,0.00005320697,0.0000073690117,0.000001479953,0.000020103907,0.0028432664,0.000049015667,0.000051171715,0.99041593,0.0043846867,0.0021687844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012138565,0.000010181068,0.0007985903,0.000098192744,0.0000064226015,0.00007614902,0.0036402538,0.00023849371,0.00026485705,0.5985751,0.3962436,0.0000359861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32165357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2816109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32165357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020548873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014555448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6395627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270196483","doi":"","title":"Racial and Ethnic Profiling: Statutory Discretion, Democratic Accountability and Constitutional Remedies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Racial profiling; Statutory law; Statute; Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Law; Accountability; Supreme court; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028475146932812282,"score_gpt":0.3006014576285891,"score_spread":0.2721263106957768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270196483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19694959,0.004461337,0.043373805,0.27522245,0.0009268672,0.00025446262,0.0002071881,0.0001893587,0.4784149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825195,0.00032504424,0.0019753352,0.009049701,0.00021584083,0.00008600273,0.000020172209,0.000017739409,0.0057907063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96253663,0.011399205,0.0015739057,0.0035379832,0.012556825,0.008395368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96656233,0.01903716,0.0041205226,0.0039184336,0.0036357404,0.0027257807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02881248,0.000379065,0.00076720247,0.0017220466,0.013499319,0.012664676,0.002226173,0.0094816685,0.0030000415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054809116,0.0005442249,0.0006650007,0.001483844,0.05210465,0.0064242207,0.0069103343,0.013723824,0.00027775118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012976283,0.000013724469,0.0007952114,0.000012641305,0.0000058706855,0.00005011042,0.0016639972,0.00030339597,0.00019657117,0.9917911,0.0011284441,0.0040258192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006877037,0.000039722367,0.0044452427,0.00021752335,0.000045250898,0.0000719334,0.0025748578,0.0016855053,0.001246753,0.9515263,0.03798208,0.00009617155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15404555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19858505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15404555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020006694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045646206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30629784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276879045","doi":"","title":"Representation Reinforcement through Advisory Commissions: The Case of Election Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Election law; Law; Commission; Legislature; Referendum; Statute; Democracy; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Economics","score_opus":0.022775179722832262,"score_gpt":0.32209730137956794,"score_spread":0.29932212165673566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276879045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11930044,0.0017912274,0.072535135,0.10202148,0.0010810815,0.00033519708,0.000089727386,0.00047618605,0.7023696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9357518,0.00035136193,0.006399448,0.008241072,0.0006719791,0.00020460496,0.000020681306,0.00009911219,0.048259858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9676146,0.015371008,0.0006201328,0.004102384,0.004947502,0.007344351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97363776,0.015700435,0.0018445699,0.004175122,0.0031403445,0.0015018143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027423216,0.0005177398,0.0006745414,0.001661757,0.018026495,0.014792834,0.0036134543,0.017305348,0.011362732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052755315,0.0008792028,0.0012157457,0.0018351916,0.018520985,0.010550618,0.008002657,0.012780582,0.0014263971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020852327,0.000020923102,0.00046153556,0.0000122061065,0.000006347004,0.00024081416,0.0024793094,0.0003901247,0.00012579148,0.98660535,0.0042828536,0.005353832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000319406,0.00017371534,0.0025302721,0.00023122231,0.00012365177,0.00054552517,0.0048975777,0.012657119,0.00264188,0.56826013,0.40744022,0.0001793449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042078607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034152016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042078607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011539391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011706192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14502954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277668868","doi":"10.3138/9781442682337-017","title":"Is Privacy a Casualty of the War on Terrorism?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Internet privacy; Information privacy; Accountability; Government (linguistics); Privacy by Design; Face (sociological concept); Computer security; Privacy policy; Personally identifiable information; Business; Political science; Computer science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03968678878748014,"score_gpt":0.24353747702854148,"score_spread":0.20385068824106134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277668868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015042577,0.015390691,0.004588749,0.27187747,0.001238913,0.000024114725,0.00017589697,0.00005191706,0.6916096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8282012,0.020994892,0.0014670095,0.030848736,0.0015793565,0.000041843774,0.0001421132,0.000092369766,0.116632506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966889,0.0011570797,0.00007015075,0.00034134797,0.00091482187,0.0008277711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701047,0.0016829757,0.00017209124,0.00046636487,0.00040672722,0.00026129655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033870442,0.00026657977,0.00029063263,0.0007615689,0.008300559,0.01344629,0.00098273,0.0038475539,0.0052328836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072315107,0.00033131588,0.00039446822,0.0015514495,0.044675577,0.013074365,0.0031155045,0.005456112,0.00080373767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008069169,0.000003293072,0.00019178228,0.000020664658,0.000004017934,0.000090854635,0.0050493125,0.0000722424,0.000039662584,0.9730741,0.013520143,0.007925942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008207397,0.000011544015,0.0009741685,0.00031027122,0.000013507678,0.00033421864,0.011040149,0.00021078743,0.00027959773,0.502513,0.48428574,0.00001879545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15720177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11656494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15720177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013522279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015006676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3125735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279239915","doi":"","title":"Clearly Canadian--Hill v. Colorado and Free Speech Balancing in the United States and Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Political science; Gerontology; Audiology; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.011001466962115729,"score_gpt":0.21750728369628577,"score_spread":0.20650581673417004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279239915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058649387,0.0071165618,0.0017641826,0.080349885,0.00058563333,0.00007939128,0.000562521,0.000039554066,0.8508529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.843322,0.0033465764,0.0014670328,0.025110992,0.00015140553,0.000062444844,0.00020717236,0.000025358038,0.12630704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612206,0.00038204013,0.00006497968,0.00036570654,0.0013751392,0.001690111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742943,0.0008047376,0.00013789184,0.00006878315,0.0011029269,0.00045620432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022028405,0.0002321302,0.00032831248,0.0013759263,0.019568743,0.007490345,0.0010768848,0.0057415753,0.009109272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065013985,0.00029061487,0.00038170672,0.0017789021,0.009138725,0.0020975322,0.0018843416,0.0035797753,0.0004196131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017899854,0.000009992887,0.0023399699,0.000045063447,0.000010968865,0.00020180768,0.0045123873,0.00024335226,0.00018770939,0.9450639,0.039874673,0.007492307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008396409,0.00004524105,0.02714884,0.00078408036,0.00014310643,0.00043065712,0.02246915,0.0014531678,0.0014275495,0.15663366,0.78912497,0.00025570084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98641324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99576014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062343106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062343106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09215462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45233303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279397834","doi":"10.55016/ojs/ajer.v46i1.54798","title":"The Internet and the First Amendment: Schools and Sexually Explicit Expression by Fred H.Cate","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Journal of Educational Research","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Psychology; Amendment; Expression (computer science); First amendment; Freedom of expression; Mathematics education; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.038967842164847825,"score_gpt":0.3636677783788371,"score_spread":0.3246999362139893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279397834","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006819684,0.05909514,0.0010095434,0.45830032,0.0037306524,0.000025344843,0.00006916903,0.00003365947,0.4709165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36463353,0.038191486,0.0012767256,0.10331382,0.0040886537,0.0001485387,0.00005059422,0.000098329605,0.48819837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985436,0.00094507966,0.000029599425,0.00009698301,0.00024875617,0.00013591602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99523515,0.004012038,0.00017679267,0.00015112969,0.00027639404,0.00014854195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022370333,0.00031238463,0.0002930315,0.0007716038,0.006905741,0.0066487077,0.0006516526,0.0065183695,0.0069259605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007046999,0.00027378954,0.00018625933,0.00083048776,0.015478791,0.0069304355,0.0020610844,0.0067231106,0.00096403906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007640944,0.000013019383,0.00008020347,0.000027177688,0.000001638993,0.00008617042,0.0060673174,0.000047625235,0.000036749883,0.75508714,0.23120742,0.0073379134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000801736,0.0000070551164,0.00045095247,0.00034887213,0.0000024938233,0.000098993696,0.006396648,0.000103560145,0.00009814167,0.100956,0.891515,0.000014221028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03114803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056330375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03114803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045624287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033720618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061933458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281236282","doi":"","title":"Policy in the Lives of Marginalized Girls: Mapping the Disjunctures","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Interpretation (philosophy); Enforcement; Government (linguistics); Political science; Judicial interpretation; Corporate governance; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.019146408138844273,"score_gpt":0.2840177241725991,"score_spread":0.2648713160337548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281236282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92009276,0.0073292335,0.0013217045,0.009155738,0.00006111709,0.000088432644,0.00062241766,0.000013297085,0.061315384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99493814,0.0030053637,0.0003789774,0.00032863006,0.000011611404,0.000038555074,0.00011560099,0.000020049929,0.0011630666],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953884,0.0016579974,0.00014231067,0.00050605764,0.00077171903,0.0015334473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99616325,0.0019606487,0.00055972143,0.00016087233,0.0006714505,0.00048418672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035494687,0.0005020079,0.0007711176,0.004658598,0.011056153,0.012583527,0.0023432672,0.0011807785,0.0053994255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009422776,0.0004506018,0.00036859984,0.008011133,0.022671536,0.008410333,0.010394109,0.0035131823,0.0002354315],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005475246,0.000027692475,0.040251635,0.00023831926,0.000023461922,0.0004393845,0.8855916,0.00009554419,0.00025373165,0.053924482,0.0009453414,0.018154053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017514385,0.000008982048,0.030224012,0.00035732312,0.0000121319135,0.000080781945,0.95145386,0.00006610418,0.00008962663,0.0037713412,0.013924391,0.000009581303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4566494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52225417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4566494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027618252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020285808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9079828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282359210","doi":"","title":"Keeping Pace: The U.S. Supreme Court and Evolving Technology","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - Ursinus (Ursinus College)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Law; Mainstream; Political science; Pace; Government (linguistics); The Internet; Notice; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.028175080682100558,"score_gpt":0.2663652058654589,"score_spread":0.23819012518335836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282359210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13788083,0.011718225,0.0039353427,0.19031808,0.0010391683,0.000028485607,0.00013748775,0.00004976077,0.6548927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9372912,0.0027524144,0.00093100907,0.03470803,0.000663703,0.000038509585,0.000048658538,0.00003787229,0.023528533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938164,0.0018748555,0.0001856445,0.0009612479,0.0017584359,0.0014034401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934408,0.004469255,0.00040998837,0.00041228917,0.0007659518,0.0005016946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007176511,0.00019592915,0.0002561153,0.0015996813,0.013221255,0.02087348,0.0014226055,0.012888725,0.0038836172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015417732,0.00026751877,0.0005412561,0.0024286925,0.02111462,0.011713327,0.003941118,0.01121028,0.00057708815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006517055,0.0000080944255,0.00059962855,0.0000064835367,0.0000018542758,0.00020502465,0.0054101017,0.00010684189,0.00007685133,0.980531,0.008235731,0.0048120553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000315021,0.0000507496,0.0034422344,0.0003918311,0.000024142626,0.00029534093,0.019679427,0.0006958105,0.00075114536,0.54792255,0.42663643,0.00007875619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037883483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049901508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037883483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011156306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008007568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080945015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282413001","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195372472.003.0014","title":"Identity Cards and Identity Romanticism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"National identity; Exceptionalism; Political science; Romance; Identity (music); Comity; Law; Media studies; Sociology; Politics; Aesthetics; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.030493024570466064,"score_gpt":0.29188548099297384,"score_spread":0.2613924564225078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282413001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080004305,0.004401595,0.0042794934,0.028417047,0.0008290007,0.000026759293,0.000033000048,0.0000413604,0.8819675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700095,0.0013017815,0.0005286234,0.001638709,0.00030484545,0.000022016271,0.000024772547,0.000018639976,0.026151093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99539524,0.0032872122,0.00009810569,0.00029802378,0.00052432803,0.0003970063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969369,0.0015329312,0.00034148747,0.00038529324,0.00038468174,0.00041867263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003637981,0.000339811,0.0003628105,0.0013888625,0.0063372664,0.011214314,0.0008810943,0.001986385,0.0101611465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004983608,0.0001788773,0.00023189881,0.0012026981,0.040825173,0.009325987,0.0065284227,0.005465129,0.0010921224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044297167,0.000009916462,0.00015880085,0.0000059544723,5.3317723e-7,0.000037214424,0.00919284,0.000016931328,0.000016736385,0.9866153,0.0017804521,0.002160912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000208262,0.00003523686,0.0008577121,0.00016897006,0.0000028922632,0.00022793704,0.038782865,0.00039465053,0.00019270579,0.74524915,0.21404962,0.000017414257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013195769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009927097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011214314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034825802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014533686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03399235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282775516","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2083825","title":"Finding Milton’s Meaning -- Campaign Finance and Free Expression in Comparative Perspective: The United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Kingdom; Perspective (graphical); Campaign finance; Political science; Public administration; Economic history; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.030130104664696112,"score_gpt":0.29069383763889267,"score_spread":0.26056373297419655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282775516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3550896,0.0102837,0.0014216806,0.11835974,0.0002884738,0.000024507694,0.000379328,0.000013607311,0.51413935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989622,0.0007570141,0.00012588695,0.0017202528,0.000019817217,0.000008614262,0.000025221892,0.000012970741,0.00770819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976198,0.0008945612,0.00004262843,0.00023390788,0.0003657879,0.0008433096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948645,0.0032804578,0.00026418522,0.00018369254,0.0009240496,0.0004830091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031137352,0.00026978043,0.00049378123,0.0033636556,0.017329952,0.01518708,0.0010206647,0.0040773326,0.011979601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010706882,0.00017038551,0.00030842717,0.005028977,0.027991604,0.010177398,0.0037029667,0.0038069675,0.00020994093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043525662,0.000016635526,0.003349913,0.000037820402,0.000008269685,0.00009629075,0.093206614,0.000111777765,0.000034460638,0.8868277,0.007477432,0.008789608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034798784,0.000018663914,0.02161384,0.0009894584,0.00006245851,0.00008852829,0.5213327,0.00042536313,0.0002565761,0.2062088,0.2489136,0.000055312747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8836419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90615493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1163581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05285492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038907148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3834911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283415456","doi":"","title":"Advertising and the Charter: Just Do It? An Analysis of the Constitutional Recognition of Commercial Expression","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Jurisprudence; Expression (computer science); Constitutional law; Political science; Politics; Marketplace of ideas; Sociology; First amendment; Computer science","score_opus":0.0467082171192189,"score_gpt":0.32601063120417223,"score_spread":0.2793024140849533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283415456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05187286,0.0068165823,0.015272978,0.041901957,0.0004658115,0.00008651469,0.00012958677,0.000089022156,0.88336474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93770325,0.0022335937,0.0025626456,0.008372606,0.00067270105,0.00014525423,0.00006367524,0.00008884889,0.04815741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884165,0.0034145806,0.00033537942,0.0015384625,0.0039570695,0.002338089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933769,0.0042014746,0.00039216824,0.0006095567,0.0011193914,0.00030049664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007623699,0.0004223482,0.0006317713,0.0018306437,0.012209915,0.017495872,0.0020280406,0.0075255143,0.0055180592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0129146,0.0005877572,0.00075873546,0.0021918276,0.045400232,0.008622988,0.0031356493,0.010560395,0.0006630761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016737824,0.0000033659608,0.00003932365,0.0000030226017,5.2079724e-7,0.00001840735,0.00059743173,0.000027015902,0.00003154475,0.9977748,0.0007040596,0.0007988384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004129493,0.00004273929,0.0017143947,0.00018086094,0.000038402482,0.0001400268,0.0028598572,0.001170542,0.00092837197,0.8173833,0.1754262,0.000073901196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1927273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.122464634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8072727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02302411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02034357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38321102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283748176","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-057-4-199","title":"Reduction to Absurdity: Reasonable Expectations of Privacy and the Need for Digital Enlightenment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IOS Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Absurdity; Enlightenment; Reduction (mathematics); Internet privacy; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.040023635971382074,"score_gpt":0.27192085031930324,"score_spread":0.23189721434792115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283748176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029113088,0.0056785345,0.032810725,0.10407739,0.00046772443,0.000060700942,0.000082214254,0.00009954066,0.82761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94753975,0.0021645145,0.0044026836,0.007694184,0.0001930663,0.000054957494,0.000049733364,0.000047075733,0.037854154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99046654,0.0031233088,0.00018458697,0.00061399065,0.00444882,0.0011626738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948362,0.0028052828,0.00032292653,0.0007072001,0.0011013059,0.00022718206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006774723,0.000286751,0.00031403024,0.0009170561,0.00677463,0.011508383,0.0017091003,0.0033517247,0.003347939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011522935,0.00021860945,0.00044331249,0.0009960273,0.04998452,0.007960568,0.0047743022,0.0065027317,0.0004867314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033261808,0.0000033876815,0.000065614615,0.000014446356,0.0000011569032,0.000025585065,0.005660729,0.00010765532,0.000044817367,0.9881441,0.0020537672,0.003875431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010140474,0.0000142376275,0.00070201,0.0002864247,0.000009596404,0.0001559967,0.008606232,0.00080726226,0.00046974226,0.7661696,0.22274,0.000028679066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1528731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104231596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1528731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019218797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024789985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30396658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294065045","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Bona Fides of Entrapment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Fides; Entrapment; Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.029172024033584994,"score_gpt":0.2532432732293926,"score_spread":0.22407124919580762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294065045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22482073,0.005015902,0.00981803,0.28163815,0.0022932847,0.00012781171,0.00021992563,0.000110393354,0.4759557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676175,0.0013347854,0.0012075122,0.02085682,0.00049969176,0.000044910154,0.00003585569,0.00004722352,0.008355723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9702377,0.0073405122,0.0015455781,0.003437244,0.012170236,0.00526876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8651735,0.1006806,0.007795863,0.007494109,0.015805794,0.0030500942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03996432,0.00045560504,0.0010038276,0.003832802,0.00987529,0.02019537,0.0064630946,0.016278645,0.0045358213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13720253,0.0005304124,0.0007342915,0.0028843281,0.08401283,0.01793137,0.008189944,0.019859476,0.0005922678],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043908403,0.000024321314,0.0045768814,0.000047252306,0.000009798186,0.00021025483,0.00605172,0.00016620713,0.00011664215,0.96787596,0.0058835982,0.014993492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007645963,0.00017457608,0.028754473,0.0016692327,0.00021610913,0.00052154344,0.04619339,0.0031236014,0.0036300994,0.7287889,0.18656714,0.0002845329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16998723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22106363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16998723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017916255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033036027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3379956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296731385","doi":"","title":"Democracy Divided: Campaign Finance Regulation and the Right to Vote","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Democracy; Political science; Contingent vote; Campaign finance; Spoilt vote; Position (finance); Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Group voting ticket; Business; Economics; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.011737919120823267,"score_gpt":0.2873316361146372,"score_spread":0.2755937169938139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296731385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040505312,0.0035412349,0.017862068,0.16003568,0.0007010311,0.000054943837,0.00008652976,0.000053349977,0.7771599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92965347,0.0007932088,0.0018033722,0.024844589,0.0006659484,0.00018067971,0.000044470944,0.000042815034,0.04197149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98732644,0.0065718195,0.0003356219,0.0017699152,0.0021724568,0.0018236245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99256057,0.0047692223,0.00071684923,0.0007829281,0.0006596683,0.000510862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009084745,0.00028299727,0.00038140826,0.00090822275,0.0062825177,0.0096567,0.0012076084,0.0065087015,0.007336542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01247957,0.00024702435,0.00040647312,0.0008244998,0.030102057,0.0059506153,0.006590799,0.009144913,0.00078422076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036716744,0.000005775253,0.0001903888,0.000004426672,0.0000010174231,0.000016536778,0.00069816055,0.000047949197,0.000032407588,0.9956962,0.0015650551,0.001738348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027436872,0.000020892865,0.0010054378,0.00013598237,0.0000065041927,0.000048352416,0.0014806221,0.0003262447,0.00031936937,0.88807356,0.10853903,0.000016640271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071907644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007176929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0096567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038679396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005587667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048045278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297796997","doi":"","title":"When Free Expression Gets Expensive: Legalities, Liabilities, and Realities","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Freedom of expression; Democracy; Surrender; Expression (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Population; Human rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01801150477633764,"score_gpt":0.25239159907720077,"score_spread":0.23438009430086312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297796997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07009309,0.01064393,0.012018661,0.26433948,0.0008338796,0.000037938677,0.000060323167,0.000067863206,0.64190483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96736825,0.0023030734,0.0011627164,0.010021847,0.000486587,0.000059581223,0.000023314546,0.000058509446,0.018516108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857362,0.0076770885,0.00037028946,0.00087839924,0.0029536032,0.0023844193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98863006,0.0072872117,0.0011286638,0.0010531105,0.00094028265,0.00096076453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01338014,0.00037523484,0.00059941073,0.0019586233,0.016993115,0.025914846,0.0018148879,0.011323247,0.0076365927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022477688,0.00044101238,0.00038034894,0.0019280795,0.09437597,0.028387759,0.012726535,0.012122168,0.0007663213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036864658,0.0000052910027,0.000084939486,0.0000059780323,0.0000011300122,0.00006518371,0.004154099,0.000039487495,0.000020250825,0.99202967,0.00202516,0.0015651566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001016545,0.000007753819,0.00025872316,0.00016251912,0.000004225685,0.00010766504,0.012775972,0.00018184901,0.0000685798,0.92601156,0.060391575,0.000019465679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012425616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012423171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025914846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010027075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008210248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07275188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298758775","doi":"","title":"Communication Surveillance in Korea","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Warrant; Suspect; Probable cause; Search and seizure; Law; Supreme court; Doctrine; Political science; Expectation of privacy; Electronic surveillance; Business","score_opus":0.008682010162946568,"score_gpt":0.2595224562615953,"score_spread":0.25084044609864875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298758775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13894287,0.016317824,0.0028529272,0.0359505,0.002078411,0.0002022545,0.0013599201,0.00038360778,0.80191165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7571863,0.010036982,0.0015447229,0.017507277,0.000398474,0.00009709397,0.0010292984,0.000121339006,0.21207848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992899,0.00013312184,0.00007086606,0.00014530873,0.00013456111,0.00022617182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858224,0.00022047291,0.00034696807,0.00015734011,0.00037199896,0.0003209337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072935555,0.0003228499,0.00011049375,0.0008228045,0.002185699,0.004801985,0.00040784347,0.0013828073,0.02118544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016218425,0.00022140372,0.00022041207,0.0012595148,0.0015085959,0.004783955,0.002554488,0.0020614385,0.0039926935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017143725,0.00009824367,0.028190397,0.0009877385,0.000033420147,0.005755181,0.013921959,0.00066335604,0.0043036873,0.40392408,0.2381004,0.30385014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013343558,0.00006888509,0.018965755,0.00034618165,0.000015908387,0.001754928,0.009991447,0.00028341394,0.00095517247,0.0058964924,0.9616466,0.00006181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013234331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013665124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02118544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032143153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032644626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07087231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300714839","doi":"","title":"Improving Privacy Protection, But by How Much?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Internet privacy; Personally identifiable information; Economic Justice; Public domain; Information privacy; Data Protection Act 1998; Law and economics; Privacy policy; Political science; Computer security; Business; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.022343779163110665,"score_gpt":0.24067192027568624,"score_spread":0.21832814111257556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300714839","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045551793,0.0091092205,0.01910264,0.9007588,0.0014182542,0.00005532583,0.00011698891,0.0001310286,0.06475262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47445595,0.012217639,0.034248885,0.448,0.00469416,0.00033230183,0.00019102736,0.0002465202,0.025613485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9645738,0.019801857,0.0010816078,0.0035102693,0.006609828,0.004422654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95589453,0.025063582,0.002287829,0.008899635,0.005537497,0.002317061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035314362,0.0008875318,0.001105711,0.0013768655,0.004470956,0.01158785,0.0030640822,0.016644252,0.0096410755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07880541,0.0005823999,0.0014916202,0.0011074914,0.02236828,0.033731636,0.0070128213,0.018885959,0.0027710777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003791593,0.0000582305,0.00082853605,0.0002395449,0.00005853758,0.00008993099,0.001534678,0.0005634448,0.000506955,0.90453374,0.0588198,0.032728653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004343243,0.000067705376,0.0009248939,0.0008153042,0.0000640886,0.00019917698,0.0020724237,0.00052360917,0.001240136,0.83218956,0.1618111,0.000048567104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006962803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044651064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035314362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007283762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012064022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18676245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301249481","doi":"","title":"The Antidomination Model and the Judicial Oversight of Democracy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Gerrymandering; Democracy; Supreme court; Adjudication; Political science; Judicial review; Law and economics; Law; Harm; Normative; Power (physics); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.016226723851363416,"score_gpt":0.23723591486988468,"score_spread":0.22100919101852126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301249481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09293864,0.0057180044,0.13596395,0.09403375,0.0011096937,0.00010177874,0.00004221539,0.0001348263,0.6699571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980427,0.00064324855,0.0038727117,0.004332741,0.00048769586,0.00006116496,0.000009055208,0.000018522616,0.010147767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97747016,0.013250854,0.0006827684,0.0022107281,0.0044453912,0.0019401945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98366284,0.008095394,0.0019304021,0.003055116,0.0024274467,0.00082884025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012677387,0.00026187804,0.00036007597,0.0009218389,0.004474013,0.008914505,0.001797444,0.004477729,0.0014856375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014574112,0.00029140397,0.0003814195,0.000589379,0.030026317,0.006369827,0.004509585,0.006394392,0.00024758978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004052914,0.0000047149424,0.00011381275,0.0000056847084,0.0000011479993,0.000016033455,0.00054521515,0.0002103575,0.00006861015,0.9964154,0.00062650134,0.001988428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002722736,0.000026282743,0.0005213899,0.000047602654,0.000003601091,0.000047876234,0.000500832,0.0018557472,0.00036670733,0.94971055,0.046874978,0.000017273422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004660535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004741605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012677387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051299063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00785409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06704521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2306256110","doi":"","title":"The Anti-Discrimination Norm in Human Rights and Charter Law: Nixon V. Vancouver Rape Relief","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Meaning (existential); Charter; Law; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Transsexual; International human rights law; Sociology; Gender studies; Transgender; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01223796314377971,"score_gpt":0.26359476700878476,"score_spread":0.25135680386500503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2306256110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30430898,0.0021102575,0.0029024996,0.069510296,0.00054441486,0.00008057844,0.00009289048,0.000027413864,0.62042266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662437,0.00051083474,0.0006672429,0.0070877257,0.000046133773,0.0000419652,0.000020229048,0.000008876338,0.025373215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994266,0.0016234658,0.00013964732,0.0004361959,0.0027670537,0.00076768757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972167,0.0016768938,0.00017080655,0.0001604919,0.0005551026,0.00021985041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038102001,0.00015141643,0.0003424581,0.00065238023,0.012573459,0.0063318135,0.0012298333,0.0047813426,0.002044809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011064582,0.00025861646,0.00009663429,0.0008276654,0.0131599875,0.0013675791,0.0022097835,0.0059700524,0.00019072641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006180122,0.000051545143,0.004434284,0.00006275171,0.0000065348318,0.00071655685,0.025764033,0.00022383487,0.0008474705,0.9310969,0.015766263,0.020968027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017535985,0.0002063792,0.03716378,0.0007984231,0.00006890111,0.0015198052,0.0972698,0.0021347825,0.0052507212,0.2157711,0.63939345,0.0002475672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4553008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70565253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5446992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010572045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013112703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90530133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2307093205","doi":"","title":"Preface: Privacy Revisited: A Global Perspective on the Right to Be Left Alone","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Right to privacy; Privacy law; Political science; The Right to Privacy; Personally identifiable information; Privacy policy; Information privacy; Framing (construction); Data Protection Act 1998; Fundamental rights; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights; Engineering","score_opus":0.0142176631653727,"score_gpt":0.29294799837563834,"score_spread":0.27873033521026563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2307093205","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002972015,0.08037863,0.0055762837,0.51678723,0.07786798,0.000058676713,0.00029756382,0.00006690944,0.31599474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14903924,0.09508429,0.0038229572,0.2975281,0.09067959,0.0001864818,0.00057662505,0.00039443103,0.36268824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984854,0.0006456362,0.00005145666,0.0002763848,0.00037207958,0.00016910296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958477,0.003132181,0.00013985974,0.00017465005,0.00042619216,0.00027944686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001774442,0.0007083187,0.00064196554,0.0011730996,0.005195319,0.008746351,0.0014612587,0.0052985637,0.011861183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00464963,0.0002807648,0.00064044574,0.0019486368,0.011129273,0.011008425,0.0032823966,0.017455867,0.0026971842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013378985,0.000011887449,0.00017793766,0.00018995392,0.0000035940711,0.00018753715,0.0056803077,0.00016880823,0.0000850865,0.50139856,0.48020458,0.011878287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030288948,0.000012240661,0.00026516174,0.00051307346,0.0000030768424,0.00017567856,0.0030574147,0.00011361574,0.000048345482,0.081145845,0.91465294,0.000009568559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049106013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005418451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011861183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049339146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002914303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039679587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315603950","doi":"","title":"Ethics in the Cultural and Educational Industries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Ethics","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Happiness; Sociology; Law and economics; Paternalism; Argument (complex analysis); Social psychology; Law; Positive economics; Psychology; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.1707345475682381,"score_gpt":0.42872960149678097,"score_spread":0.25799505392854283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315603950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015671609,0.018097365,0.00764879,0.2330937,0.0018769548,0.00003505045,0.000028785147,0.000046433463,0.7235013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8035279,0.008062155,0.0051856404,0.07220031,0.0021331243,0.00020163038,0.000025845162,0.000109369015,0.10855403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97117776,0.023082191,0.0004868563,0.0009952642,0.0023719654,0.0018860418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864877,0.007816495,0.0008519485,0.0016300369,0.0016778662,0.0015359069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013587345,0.0005273716,0.0004314098,0.0011320906,0.015457537,0.013235495,0.0010958501,0.0069244457,0.0059990673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014036479,0.00033479717,0.00031392276,0.0013333173,0.08095746,0.007722033,0.006388678,0.008718231,0.0014140079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038374787,0.0000072651214,0.00016422817,0.000013178439,0.0000018736724,0.00003991422,0.008850312,0.000049221017,0.000023659355,0.9795671,0.007579714,0.0036996494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074588565,0.000011357897,0.0004123696,0.00030347417,0.0000026773967,0.00008806346,0.009939738,0.00015706003,0.00012436658,0.5347472,0.45419142,0.0000148934405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00949345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012116505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015457537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007902456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010523211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07185757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321269879","doi":"10.7202/1035388ar","title":"R. v. Spencer: Anonymity, the Rule of Law, and the Shrivelling of the Biographical Core","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Anonymity; Law; Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; Possession (linguistics); The Internet; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03204187655207375,"score_gpt":0.26880271401588235,"score_spread":0.2367608374638086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321269879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05732544,0.007678821,0.009598037,0.3328496,0.0021497915,0.00015758291,0.00036947732,0.00027721107,0.58959407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66916573,0.0032998684,0.004336824,0.18024777,0.0016299299,0.00019997265,0.0001361164,0.00011473382,0.14086916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815316,0.0030728106,0.0006751283,0.0020828738,0.0076429136,0.004994561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98889065,0.005855804,0.0008501091,0.00081517285,0.0028175933,0.0007707876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010141928,0.0006149026,0.00085051096,0.0011899349,0.018740444,0.010595818,0.0033615718,0.021160936,0.00303736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023002984,0.0008169101,0.0012350596,0.0011082598,0.02189458,0.0048181294,0.0027493276,0.016702894,0.00085262477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022113769,0.000010629809,0.0003663137,0.000018298007,0.000006838007,0.0003358188,0.0025492052,0.00027275353,0.00018902062,0.9562881,0.036361214,0.0035797074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011988019,0.00009103685,0.004403821,0.0006357558,0.00011570158,0.00048957224,0.0049323393,0.0031319072,0.0021795775,0.48862532,0.49495178,0.00032331157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7380282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75781065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7380282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029905785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056024503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52702916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322645813","doi":"10.1177/1462474510383461","title":"Book Review: Wayne A. Logan, Knowledge as Power: Criminal Registration and Community Notification Laws in America, Stanford Law Books: Stanford CA, 2009; 288 pp. (including index): 9780804761369 (pbk)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Punishment & Society","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Law; Criminology; Power (physics); Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.030266164261070833,"score_gpt":0.31951496057491574,"score_spread":0.2892487963138449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322645813","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011385646,0.91311234,0.00037570077,0.026449649,0.020852573,0.0000647049,0.00071199395,0.00012387086,0.03819534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012301112,0.82000583,0.00060511794,0.014141612,0.01107125,0.00010961018,0.00085766875,0.00008865716,0.15189017],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947876,0.00005756878,0.000040367027,0.00007991231,0.0003080255,0.000035344226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979564,0.0007504746,0.00016126754,0.000040309962,0.000903967,0.0001874397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066813827,0.0014815164,0.0020232361,0.0043520597,0.0008362094,0.0027404544,0.002233187,0.0025090207,0.06620637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034014115,0.00060417474,0.0005975116,0.0069457754,0.0007775546,0.0035985967,0.0011814355,0.0035297242,0.06486552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051753664,0.0000052635687,0.000017495522,0.0005188156,0.0000039808874,0.000012085322,0.000018507013,0.000021993073,0.000018412107,0.00031846188,0.95995694,0.039102755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060728617,0.0000062835807,0.00016526094,0.00087432616,0.000007365212,0.00012289175,0.000026067257,0.000014067462,0.000018205463,0.00024873845,0.9985039,0.0000068392023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0117043005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02774241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06620637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021187437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035283421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22148234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327950701","doi":"10.1515/1540-8884.1440","title":"The End of the Reform Era? Campaign Finance Retrenchment in the United States and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forum","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Repeal; Retrenchment; Deregulation; Political science; Politics; Public administration; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.009858362350397196,"score_gpt":0.23027817057968067,"score_spread":0.22041980822928348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327950701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55206996,0.009187395,0.0002688728,0.24243447,0.0005365671,0.000109562825,0.00055040495,0.000032938602,0.1948098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699922,0.002486797,0.00013158956,0.012540037,0.000102791964,0.000015640939,0.00013077301,0.000012579516,0.014587575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99201375,0.00043669707,0.00011704326,0.00027755986,0.0020660346,0.005088867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99188715,0.0010279686,0.0006771633,0.0002138997,0.003123073,0.0030707102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004118608,0.00016195343,0.0005019765,0.002261538,0.013600223,0.009123779,0.0015625309,0.0029315308,0.006730037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010247915,0.00024856118,0.00038493043,0.0034010948,0.0072001317,0.0021405881,0.0024602965,0.0051166,0.00021068791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033152822,0.00038500977,0.12326875,0.00024564477,0.00008307067,0.0015900871,0.05139904,0.0018050062,0.0014045262,0.5588448,0.121660516,0.13898201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000098670636,0.000085319705,0.38622352,0.0006527403,0.00007730845,0.00016510596,0.07348474,0.0013454555,0.0013758366,0.009618435,0.52669084,0.00018199558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9938817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99638367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13358437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13358437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20409492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96922696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332434379","doi":"","title":"Tuning in to Democracy: Community Radio, Free Speech and the Democratic Promise","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternate routes","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Free speech; Political science; Community radio; Sociology; Political economy; Media studies; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02181925699827339,"score_gpt":0.27596754218923747,"score_spread":0.2541482851909641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332434379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07868464,0.0076062675,0.018482154,0.19820645,0.001527812,0.000037575875,0.000111677655,0.00009205383,0.69525135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96540534,0.0014011556,0.0016293233,0.005825943,0.00087913085,0.00004579833,0.000023616385,0.00005266145,0.024737045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952206,0.003115636,0.00006471985,0.00039938904,0.00049416546,0.0007054195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896039,0.0079391,0.0006096728,0.0007312495,0.00049410114,0.0006219976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005618116,0.00036159487,0.00043812158,0.0010734204,0.006415482,0.015099685,0.0009834939,0.006498085,0.023413047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01724349,0.0002649025,0.0003634206,0.0012846366,0.030878821,0.014132488,0.004929202,0.0054451646,0.0016271686],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046589343,0.000033327222,0.00029607478,0.000028557168,0.000004305751,0.00003722448,0.0033776946,0.00020015375,0.00005645881,0.9788134,0.006323238,0.0107829515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032920092,0.000015225978,0.00051733584,0.00006419756,0.0000063332013,0.00003725411,0.0055564423,0.00030009335,0.00010454034,0.9484212,0.044929344,0.000015040126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004623179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006210438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023413047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00263313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035120426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07832438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336937760","doi":"","title":"Reviewing PIPEDA: Control, Privacy and the Limits of Fair Information Practices","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personally identifiable information; FTC Fair Information Practice; Entitlement (fair division); Privacy policy; Privacy by Design; Internet privacy; Information privacy law; Information privacy; Scope (computer science); Control (management); Business; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.024174206210570957,"score_gpt":0.2679656003852986,"score_spread":0.24379139417472764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336937760","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009287056,0.13992262,0.047769256,0.47180012,0.011043129,0.00032575676,0.0002861807,0.00026171346,0.31930414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5007438,0.17836529,0.028487366,0.18738855,0.016933141,0.0013061957,0.00035208996,0.00047843513,0.08594509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9608505,0.016259193,0.0021808993,0.0027401433,0.01632131,0.001647998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9110028,0.06792434,0.0022250623,0.0028009003,0.0149974665,0.001049403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041200474,0.0005588215,0.0011397771,0.0042585847,0.007769766,0.015528813,0.0025904544,0.015109155,0.0020777856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.088246614,0.0009754541,0.00075414,0.0039698933,0.036787353,0.015742673,0.004898621,0.015779043,0.0007697307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044552526,0.0000048237403,0.00011751697,0.00015847334,0.000003644923,0.00007200205,0.0028282804,0.00037587,0.000035410667,0.93635374,0.04970427,0.010341539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010815095,0.000025023513,0.00060432893,0.0020308604,0.00002185345,0.00007976457,0.0022645777,0.00065222033,0.0002740868,0.23863092,0.7553465,0.00005910366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085870445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07585315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91412956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024576789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03484356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21789151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346222212","doi":"","title":"The \"Inexorable Zero\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Phrase; Affirmative action; Law; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Rest (music); Zero (linguistics); Law and economics; Action (physics); Sociology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics; Physics","score_opus":0.016929622553129905,"score_gpt":0.2621832436139102,"score_spread":0.2452536210607803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346222212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07244213,0.003136803,0.05548061,0.06515448,0.0015084753,0.0000554636,0.0002155703,0.00010819786,0.80189824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94712055,0.0010383672,0.004790437,0.008589133,0.0005858813,0.00009744743,0.00009688892,0.000043391577,0.0376379],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485296,0.0018275637,0.00019548279,0.0010725737,0.0015468528,0.0005046126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727935,0.00089168653,0.0004252366,0.00048259567,0.0005404176,0.0003807186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036521342,0.00042365247,0.0003654468,0.0010370599,0.003497755,0.0045445776,0.0012242916,0.0021066212,0.005364408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00625537,0.00025749576,0.00035536545,0.0005630039,0.038171586,0.0060739745,0.0060767243,0.0051861987,0.0008420279],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004503061,0.000004287976,0.00019020523,0.000013382475,9.987682e-7,0.000013969983,0.00070080045,0.000020113956,0.000065278,0.9948329,0.001189512,0.0029640244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013978305,0.000045869914,0.0006447573,0.00015190225,0.000011736332,0.00018601,0.0019807792,0.0001935534,0.0004420761,0.8678406,0.12847365,0.000015069707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018904796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022769743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005364408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001971356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040626526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019314587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2407744157","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2743","title":"Book Note: Brandishing The First Amendment, by Tamara Piety","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Piety; Amendment; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.00930279780565647,"score_gpt":0.24739074513833148,"score_spread":0.23808794733267502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2407744157","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031620448,0.028838437,0.0016876344,0.5668927,0.02952083,0.000054273347,0.00025912572,0.00010610934,0.36947882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048722677,0.0066752997,0.0011306424,0.32073528,0.012398851,0.00016876005,0.000069817834,0.00015079475,0.60994786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990982,0.00023673028,0.000034852183,0.00021508482,0.00028825176,0.00012691201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825436,0.0013399086,0.00006291852,0.00007568794,0.00017688867,0.00009024334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014179399,0.0006085081,0.00047065993,0.0006015615,0.006583834,0.0059977565,0.0013715494,0.013390651,0.013796578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069932346,0.00043574872,0.00038109004,0.000627298,0.008503673,0.007164325,0.0019420108,0.015501807,0.004105462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012873551,0.000012457642,0.000084578045,0.000030820553,0.0000028601441,0.000048911752,0.0009721036,0.00006594625,0.000087121145,0.2752731,0.717754,0.005655279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017235281,0.000016685646,0.000530444,0.0001599594,0.000008942698,0.000057235477,0.000991291,0.00011089568,0.00028814035,0.080652855,0.9171386,0.000027672091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027287299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06701136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027287299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035548373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038896035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054256976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2426990485","doi":"10.1017/s0898030616000178","title":"Deliberating Surveillance Policy: Congress, the FBI, and the Abuse of National Security Letters","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy History","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer security; National security; Criminology; Internet privacy; Public administration; Law; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01554753593477804,"score_gpt":0.27210805912199143,"score_spread":0.2565605231872134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2426990485","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08246231,0.009510467,0.0011713685,0.5904221,0.0007524618,0.000033014156,0.00012305508,0.000033722303,0.3154915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9323841,0.003360884,0.00038973216,0.04245482,0.0005520463,0.000048200276,0.00002698085,0.000026990061,0.020756261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801139,0.0127418395,0.00054626644,0.0008991066,0.002124976,0.0035739085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95652986,0.035559498,0.0034991724,0.0007858963,0.0020954795,0.0015300666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024772469,0.00031844765,0.0005239909,0.0019450086,0.01319288,0.023316313,0.0015925522,0.0153432535,0.010956673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05285881,0.00048061713,0.00039201917,0.0028540131,0.0151736215,0.0099521885,0.0048092804,0.009226328,0.0008676812],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009965032,0.000065956796,0.0034712274,0.00008830516,0.000027311713,0.0003217847,0.018913114,0.00044929562,0.00017046608,0.89798665,0.059464134,0.018942125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008938233,0.000096643686,0.010818856,0.0020595938,0.00010395522,0.00024892914,0.06402896,0.001897896,0.0014058765,0.4279243,0.49116033,0.00016519404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06868089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064171344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06868089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021173833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01861261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15362763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474951546","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0017","title":"Technological tattletales and constitutional black holes: communications intermediaries and constitutional constraints","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intermediary; State (computer science); Constraint (computer-aided design); Business; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Law; Economics; Engineering; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.03281549725311105,"score_gpt":0.3141082639295648,"score_spread":0.28129276667645375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474951546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22509561,0.0024088845,0.21563289,0.05000191,0.00036247523,0.00021778121,0.00012667075,0.00022798324,0.5059258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99003464,0.00029339347,0.0042332993,0.0008116799,0.000071735194,0.000086131426,0.000015180758,0.00003307565,0.0044208895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.987931,0.0061713653,0.0004881184,0.0020526028,0.0019125886,0.0014443034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97244745,0.016875008,0.0028228508,0.0054907734,0.0014865338,0.00087736204],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014697411,0.0004008695,0.00056066987,0.0022068785,0.008611362,0.0151214795,0.002460019,0.0052937157,0.008915516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024411079,0.00063345133,0.00061196205,0.0017331211,0.11783026,0.025280507,0.012223472,0.0076573663,0.0005451028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028107604,0.0000029305631,0.00008833594,0.0000049074793,0.0000010096489,0.000031139756,0.001902167,0.00012483563,0.000032944732,0.9969914,0.0001352715,0.0006821953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000130003045,0.000015582551,0.0002257204,0.00009135746,0.000006913944,0.00008746094,0.0033513892,0.0010003678,0.0003553755,0.97222733,0.022607783,0.00001768996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037616163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022804574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006193853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053194035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07772833},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2486206515","doi":"10.1057/9780230293960_9","title":"The Courts and the Constitution: Hate Speech and Pornography in the United States, Canada, and Europe","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; First amendment; Law; Political science; Politics; Pornography; Free speech; Privilege (computing)","score_opus":0.01215413919057635,"score_gpt":0.2177723002988972,"score_spread":0.20561816110832085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2486206515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050956704,0.032752916,0.0004254927,0.03163029,0.00048760464,0.000020182684,0.0001316473,0.000021525866,0.8835737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83992213,0.01541245,0.00038896236,0.013156941,0.00025082397,0.00003894484,0.000116025236,0.000058739988,0.13065507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598086,0.00052690937,0.00005403302,0.00024612565,0.0012451415,0.0019469387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878114,0.0003760095,0.00006960098,0.000054852833,0.00044364808,0.0002747084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015286126,0.00045562699,0.00045343264,0.0025240413,0.029451957,0.014635262,0.0014656201,0.0062794583,0.005556358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003782172,0.0003985247,0.00031833566,0.0043110307,0.030567486,0.0030686986,0.004372445,0.005925702,0.00040586325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013441771,0.00001631578,0.0009206324,0.000018364384,0.000006148724,0.00022895959,0.013637046,0.00016667158,0.00005344318,0.95813566,0.017545115,0.009258072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003532258,0.000013648674,0.012086073,0.0008249397,0.000037143676,0.00018960779,0.044548318,0.00044742232,0.00030719786,0.16086,0.7805578,0.000092532944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98036855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08114033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08114033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10969262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5887171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493198512","doi":"10.4018/978-1-61520-831-9.ch010","title":"Culture Clashes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Relation (database); Political science; Law; National security; Privacy law; Public administration; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Computer science","score_opus":0.026587870430211234,"score_gpt":0.27029413153233,"score_spread":0.24370626110211877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493198512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065729596,0.016800506,0.0056258133,0.040783264,0.0021078046,0.00003380394,0.00012539772,0.000087131426,0.8687067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9187383,0.009438649,0.0011281763,0.0137244,0.000753326,0.00006273859,0.000076740536,0.0001729759,0.055904735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600804,0.0018236155,0.00011351771,0.0006519952,0.00064008177,0.0007627475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976508,0.0009755429,0.00022242397,0.0004051509,0.00024744423,0.0004986479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002723762,0.0006542762,0.0008394787,0.0015015668,0.010541662,0.010318647,0.001008088,0.0019129589,0.01591648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042817304,0.00033197957,0.00040714227,0.001510827,0.030412132,0.009955577,0.011509771,0.005310243,0.0019693896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031342443,0.000023155071,0.0011766605,0.0001048732,0.000027494028,0.00021747086,0.07571059,0.000083893276,0.00019730657,0.87653524,0.010100572,0.03579142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010270265,0.000045207576,0.0027486677,0.0007075459,0.00003090233,0.00067480485,0.09491602,0.00010688898,0.00034972958,0.34761068,0.5527546,0.000044748478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006376455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008818316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01591648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038531045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027304916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053245902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500111186","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199315215.001.0001","title":"Privacy Revisited: A Global Perspective on the Right to Be Left Alone","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Personally identifiable information; Political science; Privacy policy; Right to privacy; The Right to Privacy; Information privacy; Privacy law; Data Protection Act 1998; Framing (construction); Fundamental rights; Internet privacy; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.020298779473385726,"score_gpt":0.28576587378012175,"score_spread":0.26546709430673604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500111186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012015971,0.0539511,0.016318072,0.36620572,0.0046099233,0.000035321125,0.00012273536,0.0000699171,0.5466712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69363016,0.06091622,0.0052773976,0.15459795,0.0072437143,0.00021060364,0.00018480085,0.0002632444,0.07767579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918646,0.0046637845,0.0001915727,0.0010476866,0.0011117187,0.0011206657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99452883,0.004303179,0.00024396562,0.0003942659,0.00026335768,0.00026647933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00526059,0.0009165329,0.00082144816,0.0016293825,0.008022123,0.017740121,0.0019690972,0.009819488,0.005671823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056708357,0.00039381388,0.0012136745,0.0030741754,0.051996898,0.02142257,0.01059322,0.017617375,0.0007225778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061135233,0.00000344968,0.00007086453,0.000042420645,0.0000030239555,0.00009583419,0.0066366135,0.00013614679,0.000030992484,0.98155606,0.0074653537,0.003953198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009103529,0.000023560839,0.00027215402,0.00047807448,0.00001276829,0.00034940068,0.009901839,0.00022903639,0.00012703497,0.6295692,0.35901117,0.00001668725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007524449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004541102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017740121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008002964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006454181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05806583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2505819909","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316403594.009","title":"Wade-ing into controversy: a case of accidental activism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Desegregation; Accidental","score_opus":0.01954133880415697,"score_gpt":0.2355998190465445,"score_spread":0.21605848024238755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2505819909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17489299,0.0065662055,0.007011534,0.16170664,0.0022237063,0.00007447791,0.000049771075,0.00011411742,0.64736056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89825535,0.0013439505,0.001887939,0.047882255,0.00076043035,0.000117458854,0.000030527277,0.00012182101,0.049600407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913517,0.005667798,0.00017221153,0.00058348844,0.001090793,0.0011340526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949812,0.0034413233,0.00032271314,0.00048158554,0.00028818694,0.00048493146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064404723,0.00039789395,0.0003977864,0.00087368314,0.019195873,0.010016969,0.0015037089,0.010171035,0.0029633613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01395022,0.00044458525,0.0007556313,0.0009534018,0.031155715,0.0072086477,0.008478073,0.01901624,0.0007861445],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021024305,0.00003538365,0.0008109728,0.000022949343,0.0000062796344,0.0025753463,0.10095912,0.00009272918,0.00021947289,0.8575877,0.030100662,0.0075683785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031777963,0.00003697494,0.0008602118,0.00047656105,0.000016546059,0.003770532,0.08162794,0.00091492344,0.00073661614,0.30008373,0.6113931,0.000050972983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00399247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008177944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019195873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035926022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027376215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034060895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508717609","doi":"","title":"Web Privacy Policies and Other Adventures in Never Never Land","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Adventure; Privacy policy; Internet privacy; Quarter (Canadian coin); The Internet; Business; Information privacy; Advertising; Computer security; Computer science; World Wide Web; Art; History; Finance; Art history","score_opus":0.011701644607318951,"score_gpt":0.27478384239654574,"score_spread":0.2630821977892268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508717609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0416558,0.0072514983,0.009820114,0.21682173,0.0022942137,0.000023224662,0.00019797143,0.00022484036,0.7217107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7945929,0.0050102915,0.0032768454,0.04611867,0.0013886003,0.00007411075,0.000147152,0.00030294896,0.14908837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548304,0.00229346,0.00012264983,0.00048715627,0.0009221293,0.000691544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916693,0.004735096,0.0005633906,0.0013713377,0.0005119208,0.001148914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042224075,0.000236373,0.00028354363,0.0009809223,0.010155421,0.011623567,0.0006840882,0.0050892737,0.011782262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013153623,0.0004277126,0.00046994892,0.0013867836,0.02562831,0.02249994,0.0069332556,0.009527767,0.0019899502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026352805,0.000037262464,0.0011581936,0.00003493708,0.000007827542,0.00021804377,0.02547558,0.00008332235,0.0001760187,0.90203357,0.051338118,0.019410752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057930115,0.000012721512,0.0008810069,0.00016804755,0.000004624771,0.000379815,0.012124721,0.00013808643,0.0002279702,0.15956557,0.82647043,0.000021171776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064368094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008725268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011782262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027799783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019214373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039415598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512887929","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2015.0007","title":"Judging Stereotypes: What the European Court of Human Rights Can Borrow from American and Canadian Equal Protection Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Harm; Law; Stereotype (UML); Human rights; Raising (metalworking); Transformative learning; Sociology; Political science; Common law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0628466398633027,"score_gpt":0.313046563790455,"score_spread":0.2501999239271523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512887929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026773445,0.009958463,0.018514657,0.21127966,0.0019651027,0.00006505218,0.00024897745,0.00009778732,0.73109674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8942785,0.007058602,0.012587802,0.055246793,0.0010104595,0.00008040737,0.00016474198,0.00015545927,0.029417314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822073,0.004329207,0.00047186244,0.0013148411,0.008574798,0.003101917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98954797,0.0047998074,0.0004346066,0.0009775095,0.0034639598,0.00077614037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016672816,0.00070172956,0.000878871,0.0055153803,0.018270465,0.01754831,0.0030522414,0.00872728,0.0040625734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024753999,0.00040282743,0.00075984,0.004601347,0.055503964,0.015435758,0.0066565224,0.009760901,0.00045818384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004169836,0.0000043106693,0.00031684132,0.00001249648,0.0000023322095,0.0000523176,0.0051100813,0.00007272396,0.000029892795,0.981952,0.005732385,0.0067105033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017612601,0.00001089277,0.0030005514,0.0006907091,0.000031924526,0.00015997453,0.016205905,0.0008216603,0.00034612117,0.7276666,0.2509463,0.000101715195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83650446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86022085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16349554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050681755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048827518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36772358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513007397","doi":"","title":"The Lawful Access Fallacy: Voluntary Warrantless Disclosures, Customer Privacy, and Government Requests for Subscriber Information","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Internet privacy; Information privacy; Business; Computer security; Government (linguistics); Secrecy; Law; Personally identifiable information; The Right to Privacy; Civil liberties; Political science; Politics; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.022974289713442536,"score_gpt":0.29620701089493806,"score_spread":0.27323272118149555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513007397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11148013,0.006919381,0.04525729,0.40527782,0.0007816932,0.00009110494,0.00017846329,0.00009694335,0.429917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96823835,0.0024436763,0.0031680572,0.016938891,0.00095631875,0.00007431219,0.000029880188,0.000033189146,0.008117333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838988,0.0073991725,0.0007240213,0.0012740738,0.0052540493,0.0014499626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9433213,0.04497542,0.004939174,0.0037187352,0.002279963,0.0007654602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014728697,0.0002443982,0.000519679,0.0014350414,0.007300849,0.012791958,0.0015879892,0.011641144,0.005895354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052705947,0.00048100806,0.0006418096,0.0023737564,0.041924242,0.021872044,0.0056666182,0.012837731,0.0004927365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006229011,0.0000053044155,0.00026735003,0.0000056485787,0.0000010128367,0.00005587125,0.00091261906,0.000040182145,0.000026613598,0.9963521,0.00082995207,0.001497194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016443837,0.00001395758,0.00064218586,0.00012055405,0.000013273149,0.00031186373,0.0025225466,0.0010533244,0.00028165002,0.9667928,0.028206952,0.000024328898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021167096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01350457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021167096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069792983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0094247395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077893734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514321000","doi":"","title":"Information Privacy Law, Fourth Edition","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Aspen Publishers, Inc. eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information privacy law; Privacy policy; Information privacy; Internet privacy; Privacy law; Consumer privacy; Privacy by Design; Anonymity; Patriot Act; Social media; Personally identifiable information; Data Protection Act 1998; Statute; Privacy software; Political science; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.025183610089341443,"score_gpt":0.23979895194193934,"score_spread":0.2146153418525979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514321000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005425201,0.08314231,0.0064645666,0.057952452,0.0070674396,0.00022691097,0.002065052,0.00056823826,0.8419706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027265992,0.06451959,0.0059562367,0.06253796,0.008587883,0.0010403884,0.0027900178,0.00050878123,0.8267931],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914336,0.0018326964,0.0005852881,0.0008353581,0.004561453,0.00075161865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947438,0.002375534,0.0002702617,0.00078188785,0.0016216598,0.00020693876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047886926,0.0015031276,0.0010887427,0.0027277998,0.0034205643,0.011294212,0.0022265075,0.010890574,0.035433214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013785981,0.0010440178,0.0011743893,0.0034741922,0.0057498487,0.009726592,0.003224234,0.010741565,0.026518723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007207728,0.00002221403,0.00015177205,0.00018310748,0.00000427366,0.0000673363,0.00041606667,0.00016080715,0.000091650145,0.21869385,0.753007,0.027194662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003933255,0.000009122173,0.000271233,0.0006680261,0.0000033793272,0.00008236353,0.00015933791,0.00008005705,0.000052503994,0.036129363,0.9625299,0.000010725293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017957773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016696146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035433214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008166686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01157559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118535876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514596130","doi":"","title":"Democratic Communication and the Library as Workplace","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Ethics","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Censorship; Intellectual freedom; Politics; Intellectual property; Human rights; Sociology; Civil liberties; Law; Sustenance; Civil society; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.020761156158113647,"score_gpt":0.2936539790936085,"score_spread":0.2728928229354949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514596130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009722106,0.007924206,0.005873598,0.115466334,0.0018550594,0.000029036986,0.000057487094,0.00031168322,0.85876054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6923532,0.0064654034,0.003395623,0.022696882,0.0029922177,0.00014978519,0.00009866491,0.00030514304,0.27154303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827953,0.010522758,0.0004609942,0.0010630433,0.0024801153,0.002677816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873268,0.0061236983,0.0012827605,0.0016737023,0.0011737084,0.002419285],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009483209,0.0004933324,0.000527533,0.0026431396,0.017677272,0.03933045,0.0014067675,0.0077347406,0.025183402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012131879,0.0003543046,0.00042437296,0.0037312205,0.033899903,0.019270128,0.018602548,0.006780183,0.0077632684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022916724,0.000057529618,0.0003409875,0.00009455976,0.0000057366983,0.00012876227,0.030702515,0.00013988599,0.00011645588,0.88747793,0.042677484,0.038235314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020526748,0.000033048454,0.00037554596,0.00025841215,0.000006085875,0.00013257585,0.016039118,0.00018755927,0.00022832569,0.29226458,0.6904286,0.000025665826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048621083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005406185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9606696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008844742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013651879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084246874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W251884708","doi":"","title":"The Chill Sets In: National Security and the Decline of Equality in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Battle; Law; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Fell; Islam; History; Ancient history; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.008383715872340354,"score_gpt":0.267937588650108,"score_spread":0.25955387277776765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W251884708","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102367654,0.024319492,0.00056124665,0.6835116,0.0045807594,0.0001310203,0.0012770034,0.000093268354,0.18315801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6520548,0.021157807,0.0013109352,0.18001328,0.00061440654,0.00010870371,0.00070958864,0.00020048527,0.14382996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930409,0.0004601071,0.0001177357,0.00045404403,0.0022029008,0.0037242384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906707,0.0006614795,0.0002621157,0.00017302283,0.002878097,0.005354633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027661815,0.00040601808,0.000772165,0.0016083125,0.0526215,0.014608742,0.0029772285,0.005688908,0.016700255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008747902,0.0005127544,0.00066394126,0.004395298,0.010132315,0.0045892564,0.0070075234,0.012542109,0.0007837337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015515144,0.00011720987,0.022503292,0.00035100628,0.00007379915,0.0017356452,0.035693757,0.00046986697,0.00039873348,0.2368248,0.62235993,0.079316825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079899626,0.00004744359,0.044238765,0.00073013315,0.000060966027,0.0003205622,0.083964,0.00065630657,0.00035002184,0.016950004,0.8523559,0.0002460894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9983595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99954623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23643374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23643374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.46068957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88562864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527490146","doi":"10.15290/bsp.2016.20a.10","title":"Systemy wyborów sędziów stanowych w USA","year":2016,"lang":"pl","type":"article","venue":"Białostockie Studia Prawnicze","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.04104183689816554,"score_gpt":0.30180851247208895,"score_spread":0.2607666755739234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527490146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5290959,0.002410777,0.004639234,0.009108407,0.00009655323,0.00010196935,0.003305066,0.00021850923,0.45102358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97141844,0.0014409502,0.0013980207,0.00087843597,0.000028577435,0.000107652806,0.0006906496,0.000028473025,0.024008734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914026,0.00017081108,0.000058499387,0.00016638532,0.00024413783,0.00021986838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993881,0.00013571119,0.00016171481,0.00008783909,0.00016076776,0.00006596926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005812528,0.00010016625,0.00019694207,0.0018794038,0.002138948,0.0039020088,0.00028933404,0.00048233155,0.013074648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015023357,0.00018706256,0.00016464479,0.0037536821,0.0016360717,0.0019548072,0.001886955,0.0009069657,0.00064111175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013024412,0.00015190835,0.081707075,0.0003624229,0.0000902241,0.00031138104,0.018286122,0.00077552977,0.0036926034,0.72164834,0.028139843,0.14470416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044813914,0.00012648696,0.35172698,0.00046182194,0.00014104505,0.00025870817,0.019898217,0.0010953469,0.0023700516,0.06694522,0.55685097,0.00008037517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12581249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27948317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12581249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004308841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00617951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25016034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530640872","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1322","title":"Book Notes: Science for Segregation: Race, Law, and the Case Against Brown v Board of Education, by John P. Jackson, Jr.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Law; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.00947662274415041,"score_gpt":0.2641372715377747,"score_spread":0.2546606487936243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530640872","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018213781,0.09026028,0.0015539017,0.57609034,0.007798412,0.000054534386,0.0015313338,0.000109415116,0.3207804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04924007,0.07654565,0.0027509043,0.24466364,0.014412554,0.00025818436,0.0015112691,0.00027082438,0.6103469],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993554,0.00013968124,0.000035677716,0.00007950234,0.00031476605,0.000075054384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714917,0.0019787217,0.00012938186,0.000067298635,0.00051219325,0.00016332645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012664186,0.0007210273,0.0003851253,0.0018850332,0.004461335,0.003995706,0.0017296063,0.006914717,0.03294464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00553354,0.0005585214,0.0004501995,0.0022188923,0.004118385,0.0062971874,0.0011036078,0.005800024,0.008661996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038104156,0.000008007715,0.00015814618,0.000031829673,0.0000013574139,0.000020484176,0.00021152975,0.000036204696,0.000024585654,0.028137112,0.9663726,0.004994314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023420023,0.000016182446,0.0023912722,0.0006056,0.000014238,0.00010891193,0.0021951396,0.00017609954,0.00023409363,0.069168866,0.9250336,0.0000326547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12515393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29759666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12515393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040606274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075746165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24885088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2536722990","doi":"","title":"Chapter X. Motion to Dismiss: Bias Crime, Online Communication, and the Sex Lives of Others in NJ v. Ravi","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Intimidation; Plea; Relation (database); Prejudice (legal term); Sexual orientation; Law; Criminology; Sexual assault; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Computer science","score_opus":0.05859957881116268,"score_gpt":0.30033399944846395,"score_spread":0.24173442063730127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2536722990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13935713,0.070022166,0.00061845884,0.19044864,0.0044034985,0.00024220973,0.00066087797,0.000028838142,0.5942182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62579536,0.039485373,0.00060195057,0.08189161,0.004382066,0.0004683232,0.00034899614,0.000056186407,0.24697009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988869,0.00037347298,0.0000423791,0.00015142535,0.0002460911,0.00029969588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991154,0.00056695973,0.00012688612,0.000024960378,0.00005917236,0.000106568266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010392155,0.000337094,0.00033270544,0.000918836,0.0097020045,0.0055340836,0.0017652528,0.006281428,0.008912386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001957138,0.0002999027,0.00051266403,0.00088893453,0.0051061367,0.0039096116,0.00379683,0.009832464,0.0009070807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037632497,0.00036886445,0.013217626,0.00032701652,0.00003278029,0.001152147,0.09551594,0.00018313566,0.00026016022,0.637656,0.21042435,0.040824316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034793182,0.00016174107,0.043057144,0.0028594926,0.000056429897,0.00089896144,0.10893732,0.00025463552,0.0006154149,0.0498053,0.79323584,0.000082921426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077888995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1509374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077888995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052472474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046299314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15487128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563002987","doi":"","title":"Teacher Cell Phone Searches in Light of Ontario v. Quon","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Richmond journal of law & technology","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Computer science; Computer security; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03661227630827063,"score_gpt":0.2619535797052298,"score_spread":0.22534130339695918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563002987","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19720578,0.0012159881,0.0005659323,0.11444359,0.00042477218,0.0002448291,0.0015045521,0.00011933663,0.68427527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44633496,0.00091830554,0.0002990053,0.03283446,0.0001049778,0.00007903023,0.00027751908,0.00005731637,0.5190944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998307,0.00012320591,0.00004111533,0.00011136259,0.0004569296,0.00096037134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977538,0.00073983625,0.00012371395,0.000060323324,0.00059093273,0.0007314408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006755029,0.00019633891,0.0003043532,0.000673974,0.024602912,0.0032277543,0.0009724434,0.0077915587,0.028221456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004019129,0.0004669729,0.00025907325,0.0012515087,0.00216657,0.00135043,0.0012839626,0.003472282,0.0024416987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045579224,0.00015778386,0.054946415,0.00028931495,0.000034996818,0.012370987,0.063564785,0.000540563,0.003954188,0.09371845,0.7399817,0.029985057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007041574,0.00009148174,0.042557806,0.0001898263,0.00005761258,0.00065521215,0.04003452,0.00051104283,0.0018421323,0.0036194988,0.91026616,0.00010432778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.961794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.961794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03742052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050419323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27150613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566270018","doi":"","title":"Apple and the American Revolution: Remembering Why We Have the Fourth Amendment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Constitutionality; Government (linguistics); Suspect; Search and seizure; Legislative history; Lawsuit; Law; Political science; Statutory law; Economic Justice; Fair use; Phone; Patriot Act; Freedom of information; Legislature; Internet privacy; Advertising; Supreme court; Terrorism; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.023173504145780132,"score_gpt":0.2670404915413949,"score_spread":0.2438669873956148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566270018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022130318,0.03309065,0.0018706056,0.4078269,0.0040040556,0.00001646874,0.000041912346,0.00008243233,0.5309366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60527927,0.01760914,0.0018299081,0.272977,0.0067584524,0.00011870449,0.00005403045,0.00016586571,0.09520771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914575,0.003458062,0.00021161177,0.00086771534,0.0021245528,0.0018805979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99107015,0.006240856,0.00040886103,0.00083247834,0.0008863554,0.00056135835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091307005,0.00042003574,0.00053505786,0.0015556536,0.012694803,0.01813382,0.0011303638,0.013335113,0.005791292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015352153,0.0004204786,0.0005382015,0.001550757,0.04626416,0.016488723,0.0045382464,0.018571377,0.0010402704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009283515,0.000008325373,0.00021213279,0.000012011974,0.0000025475651,0.000057835085,0.0032554367,0.00002919791,0.000029908511,0.96278685,0.02609905,0.007497318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013740401,0.00001922857,0.00091217627,0.0003113677,0.000010394257,0.000074928204,0.0044568586,0.000081665836,0.00016950416,0.24619731,0.74771893,0.000033949556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025788585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028664066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025788585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075885016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069075073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055058718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567552495","doi":"","title":"School Board Liability for Student-Peer Harassment and Discrimination: \"Deliberate Indifference\" and Beyond?.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education Canada","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Psychology; League; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.022797958376469918,"score_gpt":0.29672665869546205,"score_spread":0.27392870031899214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567552495","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047309473,0.015360961,0.0020325116,0.53024024,0.003762107,0.0002811199,0.00022812001,0.0001033646,0.40068218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5625398,0.009731853,0.0014809383,0.24970177,0.0021203298,0.00028244127,0.00016943365,0.000064794374,0.17390873],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98928285,0.002402142,0.0006074128,0.000858336,0.0029863992,0.003862864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98698586,0.0031066437,0.0019211518,0.0011153002,0.004200618,0.002670401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077580255,0.00051330903,0.00040285353,0.0010267083,0.012747732,0.0061089206,0.003569605,0.023665922,0.009451728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025255017,0.0010509063,0.000444449,0.0011361034,0.01576884,0.0044307834,0.0053117843,0.01144161,0.0021357252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043448985,0.00015416685,0.038391583,0.00017567763,0.0000266963,0.009941713,0.029926904,0.00015489974,0.00049955066,0.30611458,0.55536187,0.05920881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007468657,0.000089977315,0.060209204,0.0017706631,0.000055906832,0.009092667,0.04854082,0.00051196665,0.0005381447,0.042993903,0.83598274,0.00013938764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.386726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57390976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.386726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009676347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030323543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W259297610","doi":"","title":"Protecting Privacy through a Responsible Decryption Policy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & technology","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Laptop; Encryption; Amnesty; Law; Child pornography; Doctrine; Internet privacy; Computer security; Pornography; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Human rights","score_opus":0.03046451631812715,"score_gpt":0.3334296457189025,"score_spread":0.30296512940077536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W259297610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003459116,0.004930858,0.079267494,0.04600393,0.0034387382,0.000631107,0.0016562259,0.0021353941,0.8584771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2590452,0.01605279,0.06779171,0.050793912,0.008188609,0.0013652414,0.0027834156,0.001141425,0.5928377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923184,0.0025489337,0.0007058228,0.0010025577,0.002640219,0.00078406767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903689,0.0047248523,0.00047859462,0.002622297,0.0015140941,0.0002911977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004679208,0.00062596623,0.000545592,0.0012294023,0.0032835794,0.009374971,0.0013470338,0.0068558776,0.09464888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017044581,0.00067960384,0.00076833175,0.0013400703,0.0035922916,0.0098526385,0.0037364885,0.006286711,0.052257277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060148377,0.00005473512,0.00047356496,0.00020484733,0.000009392714,0.00015439052,0.00053708785,0.0005444335,0.0011117645,0.69306207,0.20721617,0.0965714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027318523,0.000045925117,0.00047744985,0.00055976503,0.0000129541695,0.0003501486,0.00025914345,0.001383964,0.002355232,0.10923599,0.8852486,0.000043504006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024771742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016680817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09464888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032165362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006006573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31663203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593637028","doi":"10.22329/cjpp.v1i1.8159","title":"The Ties That Blind: The Moral Value (and Disvalue) of Anonymity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Internet privacy; Computer security; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.12393539410649425,"score_gpt":0.33831638337820386,"score_spread":0.21438098927170962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593637028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15049951,0.0070791827,0.11866092,0.2090234,0.0026997472,0.00010595224,0.00013305557,0.00022096605,0.5115773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750327,0.0009147763,0.0057876823,0.007863643,0.0005791056,0.000070154376,0.00001864602,0.00008220876,0.009651217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95718604,0.029786268,0.0010344314,0.0029266279,0.0065802736,0.0024863041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95962673,0.024389807,0.003968064,0.006171595,0.0033934566,0.0024502925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0193993,0.00053722033,0.0007141832,0.0015599858,0.01242506,0.016657477,0.0015776873,0.008141068,0.003297222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042438783,0.0005403079,0.0007328573,0.00120433,0.07957128,0.017207688,0.012661093,0.011693196,0.00074101385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003497962,0.000015868902,0.00066428137,0.00004021786,0.000013489011,0.00011640265,0.011814793,0.0002509621,0.00023627408,0.9763966,0.0027944124,0.007621695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018694776,0.00003637619,0.00042758478,0.00013709927,0.000019151601,0.0003698233,0.0076381173,0.00063904276,0.0004782016,0.93203825,0.058149774,0.000047820617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017364481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014139458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0193993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041969037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049709994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102594554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597015980","doi":"","title":"I'm Right and You're an Idiot: The Toxic State of Public Discourse and How to Clean It Up","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œinnovation journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Idiot; Ignorance; Politics; Hyperbole; Civility; Rhetoric; State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Media studies; Political science; Literature; Philosophy; Metaphor","score_opus":0.04563214943999562,"score_gpt":0.31148137059658276,"score_spread":0.26584922115658716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597015980","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010245101,0.5151972,0.0009226156,0.3830049,0.019740364,0.000035685436,0.000100570054,0.00014103838,0.07983304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.066547796,0.39906865,0.0022653998,0.06639405,0.016303029,0.0001942806,0.00027003512,0.00070152717,0.44825524],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700767,0.0014962266,0.0001021573,0.00019038323,0.0009109723,0.0002925021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99552286,0.0017167828,0.0002425946,0.00016269255,0.001745612,0.00060955243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039797667,0.001023922,0.0007915398,0.0032144408,0.010975524,0.01457531,0.0012282542,0.003154705,0.017465651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068195355,0.00078040245,0.00034071004,0.0039623287,0.014730592,0.01285353,0.002899217,0.007953146,0.009405697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009272423,0.000011699262,0.00014830558,0.0002455369,0.000004224724,0.00006028226,0.010406429,0.000026285861,0.00009748051,0.024736589,0.92180824,0.042445622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029575103,0.0000037220193,0.00058973994,0.00078342506,0.0000037793811,0.000058542322,0.019916208,0.00001893248,0.00005653941,0.0059872833,0.97256875,0.000010039479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.105531946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20202968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105531946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010117453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015123432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20983535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604419840","doi":"","title":"Anonymity and the Supreme Court's Model of Expression: How Should Anonymity be Analysed Under Section 2(b) of the Charter?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Supreme court; Section (typography); Law; Charter; Political science; Expression (computer science); Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.043699410814146716,"score_gpt":0.27185089503528664,"score_spread":0.22815148422113993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604419840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043379962,0.006438658,0.076003134,0.28588602,0.0013010231,0.00016632001,0.00033704273,0.00012806847,0.58635986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9453031,0.001693044,0.012882347,0.0115552,0.0005838621,0.00017931101,0.000078255514,0.000060047576,0.027664887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753474,0.010855868,0.0005573605,0.002196333,0.0074380534,0.0036048947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926362,0.0032903848,0.00076637877,0.00075486745,0.0019854482,0.0005666508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0159988,0.0006939632,0.0009242649,0.00207256,0.013363507,0.020651089,0.0036029182,0.009015204,0.002165827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015829574,0.00042162894,0.0012759118,0.0021028596,0.068197116,0.011067724,0.0041463873,0.010673024,0.00045978033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015610865,0.000001420437,0.00003890405,0.0000032806595,8.055566e-7,0.000014662737,0.0011348361,0.00013910477,0.000012194059,0.99751806,0.00068697415,0.00044829227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012928659,0.000010334695,0.00036595727,0.000091566566,0.000010658522,0.000038683378,0.002000398,0.0012442403,0.00012117325,0.95434266,0.041722637,0.00003873413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4482556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2882227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5517444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054518823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05263152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8912929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605920309","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4375","title":"WARMING UP THE “CHILLING EFFECT”: A COMMENT ON THE MOTIVE CLAUSE DISCUSSIONS IN R V KHAWAJA (2010) AND R V KHAWAJA (2012)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Racial profiling; Terrorism; Constitutionality; Law; Declaration; Political science; Dignity; Enforcement; Suspect; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.05492174816345212,"score_gpt":0.3292921061895553,"score_spread":0.27437035802610316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605920309","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026988278,0.0039110803,0.00050984,0.96588445,0.006879438,0.00004210519,0.00021814292,0.000079301586,0.019776829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012779314,0.0009617939,0.00036875025,0.97555566,0.0018164141,0.000040299346,0.000025392761,0.000052637006,0.008399627],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792204,0.0042069852,0.0013885011,0.0033461459,0.006245125,0.0055927522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97543913,0.015479867,0.0010277012,0.00074191985,0.005640215,0.0016710853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018045172,0.0018326577,0.0016651992,0.0014457853,0.030773807,0.012509334,0.011919817,0.09948254,0.004524738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03231039,0.0017842785,0.0033564207,0.0022017886,0.030794272,0.008291276,0.0046214894,0.09118046,0.0017596103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048670834,0.0000274633,0.00062996487,0.00015929101,0.000025950032,0.0008735651,0.016110945,0.00016568272,0.00054524944,0.12712765,0.8500668,0.004218709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056359073,0.00003695054,0.0018426749,0.0005238662,0.00006288371,0.00030462226,0.010089864,0.0002557558,0.00086555234,0.012054119,0.9736259,0.0002814312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8039334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84700525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8039334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046169847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08036646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39444256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606403771","doi":"10.1017/s0008423915001043","title":"Toleration Without Hate Speech: The <i>Keegstra</i> Decision, American Free Speech Exceptionalism and Locke's <i>Letter</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Dissenting opinion; Exceptionalism; Polity; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Free speech; Political science; Economic Justice; First amendment; Marketplace of ideas; Context (archaeology); Liberalism; Equal Protection Clause; Sociology; Democracy; Law and economics; Politics; Constitution; Supreme court; History","score_opus":0.02874659873599342,"score_gpt":0.293339716586368,"score_spread":0.26459311785037454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606403771","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05927929,0.004124816,0.0017085411,0.70362395,0.002109833,0.000039838622,0.00011342896,0.00004167231,0.22895864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81429607,0.0011120948,0.0005343785,0.1521844,0.0008173181,0.000028959703,0.000031090356,0.000041186497,0.030954534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848526,0.0034386744,0.00046212753,0.0013503149,0.0047362605,0.005160061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806723,0.010676675,0.00093428325,0.0007154587,0.004319095,0.0026822588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013239065,0.00024927006,0.0004442908,0.00096842524,0.019044207,0.01648649,0.0022501124,0.015057969,0.0030870184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023879947,0.00030061408,0.000373111,0.0011056814,0.035833303,0.0036596414,0.00369182,0.015521547,0.00040810264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038102935,0.000023750908,0.0011435181,0.000038514707,0.000008891552,0.00027173932,0.012643828,0.00012245787,0.0002179191,0.8889422,0.085734,0.010815082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051763695,0.00004117892,0.0066751023,0.0005094555,0.000060687347,0.00020647624,0.032107703,0.0006198155,0.0014755445,0.15746397,0.80055076,0.00023754143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77465606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82013714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22534394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043076154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051819973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45334202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608985607","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1308","title":"You Don’t Need a Metaphor to Know Which Way the Case Goes: The Senate Reference and Constitutional Metaphors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06529867385144111,"score_gpt":0.3176957255885496,"score_spread":0.25239705173710847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608985607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039650016,0.03258741,0.017174957,0.2566625,0.0015525185,0.00003813159,0.00021741161,0.000112771006,0.65200424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.928111,0.007304186,0.0029994478,0.023742469,0.0003216678,0.00004237328,0.000060240367,0.00005898374,0.037359614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995227,0.0022472348,0.000077228106,0.00022575379,0.0013195972,0.0009031865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982815,0.000849802,0.00011256307,0.00013186943,0.00046943323,0.00015476407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026554416,0.00038209115,0.00041174723,0.0017885852,0.010694353,0.006440308,0.0013911612,0.0028155793,0.004026134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052292706,0.00021718383,0.0003494326,0.0024443169,0.033166647,0.006444438,0.0024492329,0.0056157853,0.00043351392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031774089,0.0000021923001,0.00016488628,0.00002093427,0.0000019864742,0.00005832993,0.0054418035,0.000048388214,0.000057717592,0.98289067,0.008197865,0.0031121036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001462998,0.000016242757,0.0019221487,0.00049675186,0.000015818086,0.00028968122,0.028783277,0.00040802383,0.00039894658,0.2957424,0.6718493,0.0000627523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6183475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7679979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6183475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022412138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025460888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7678002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618770897","doi":"","title":"The FTC, the Unfairness Doctrine, and Privacy by Design: New Legal Frontiers in Cybersecurity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of business & technology law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Computer security; Internet privacy; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.01478628708310893,"score_gpt":0.2676936259134297,"score_spread":0.2529073388303208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618770897","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023109594,0.038119033,0.031013269,0.5254854,0.0016074199,0.00007029249,0.000072328,0.00008268211,0.3804399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8614554,0.01394069,0.01076005,0.07181683,0.0028511689,0.00028296013,0.000036021276,0.00007427681,0.03878258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98236626,0.008819505,0.00066625734,0.001601755,0.0047558695,0.0017904699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97287256,0.0209848,0.0012760385,0.0024119352,0.0015369855,0.000917604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015750034,0.00052176235,0.0006025244,0.0016680318,0.007814395,0.022739945,0.0018092582,0.022664556,0.0051940624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020261401,0.00061418005,0.0008459488,0.0019157606,0.071075745,0.020275813,0.007450583,0.017793002,0.00052523456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029375276,0.000007110055,0.000077825236,0.000011917724,8.289534e-7,0.000028638058,0.000698529,0.000039771385,0.000021762638,0.9936114,0.0026924736,0.0028068607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022511367,0.000035864232,0.00048217888,0.0004530498,0.000008321052,0.00013638068,0.0025799714,0.0007294897,0.00020920113,0.8703495,0.1249634,0.00003013095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009242217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0084915245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022739945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011128229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015067115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08329517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619160121","doi":"","title":"Making the Time Fit the Crime: Clearly Defining Online Harassment Crimes and Providing Incentives for Investigating Online Threats in the Digital Age","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Incentive; Criminology; Business; Internet privacy; Computer security; Digital forensics; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Economics; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.08374184334142833,"score_gpt":0.359636468943007,"score_spread":0.2758946256015787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619160121","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15466428,0.006912796,0.14640032,0.29696977,0.004422284,0.00096379005,0.0002032364,0.00016269358,0.38930085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83916473,0.007987436,0.10005303,0.028270602,0.0008517372,0.0011628229,0.00012618718,0.00008067835,0.022302734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825142,0.008831856,0.0016342192,0.0008195636,0.004152849,0.0020471893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712323,0.014618118,0.004987032,0.0018377469,0.005108245,0.0022167016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012892158,0.0006041491,0.00057016814,0.004445897,0.00880762,0.014668437,0.0020162065,0.0070648454,0.0030025938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032619458,0.0005884495,0.00073660264,0.0019856838,0.021315098,0.02046259,0.012633992,0.007443188,0.00063917984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012518333,0.000115497605,0.010783444,0.00008103054,0.0000044597878,0.0003391149,0.012932133,0.00053898763,0.00032608458,0.9250575,0.0084842825,0.041325066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004006512,0.00018772898,0.029701952,0.0029215594,0.000032992422,0.0012278443,0.11420055,0.0050561815,0.0020235074,0.54032683,0.3040455,0.00023526602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023255678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053118218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023255678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00614892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020517766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06818104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W27134153","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.6b00079","title":"How I Corrupted America's Youth: Getting Angry Letters Is No Laughing Matter--And the Same Goes for Censorship.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"School library journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Commission for Environmental Cooperation; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Censorship; Media studies; Advertising; Intellectual freedom; Literature; Art; Psychology; History; Internet privacy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.012682268757765703,"score_gpt":0.2309084923501418,"score_spread":0.2182262235923761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W27134153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13490848,0.010877448,0.013459822,0.20272402,0.007386581,0.0002448208,0.0028864786,0.0012833382,0.626229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6757608,0.008419544,0.008197677,0.08504657,0.002797664,0.0003026222,0.0012356592,0.0012344142,0.2170051],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98928493,0.0054985327,0.00031061925,0.0009208129,0.003069669,0.00091549085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728007,0.010319602,0.004186833,0.0040988037,0.0062468937,0.002347135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006633467,0.0006876319,0.0006145706,0.0025044994,0.011297721,0.012660728,0.0012807193,0.0029539075,0.03317168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03670334,0.00045966703,0.000485305,0.003429573,0.010097939,0.009537577,0.0045803236,0.00667894,0.01412207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012440876,0.00015680822,0.04540096,0.00049644575,0.000121681995,0.00067516416,0.09756577,0.00023741405,0.00076646707,0.065249346,0.5052734,0.28393218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010542676,0.0000839424,0.020766225,0.0010610076,0.000047013433,0.0006555312,0.087333344,0.0002698147,0.0009353268,0.00912838,0.87960166,0.00010719086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014223916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024546774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03317168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029873732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003651274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11097032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739249835","doi":"","title":"Race, Rhetoric, and Judicial Opinions: Missouri as a Case Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maryland law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Narrative; Race (biology); Status quo; Scholarship; Critical race theory; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; Law; Gender studies; History; Literature; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.04814173127565492,"score_gpt":0.3730117145657373,"score_spread":0.3248699832900824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739249835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.879208,0.004842575,0.0007519643,0.016257672,0.00015182051,0.00008365133,0.00026664903,0.000033220516,0.09840428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97304183,0.00419011,0.0006542989,0.0026084748,0.0000900946,0.00009211167,0.0001391913,0.000013453334,0.01917037],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984848,0.0005252146,0.00007185864,0.00011387685,0.0003298868,0.0004744688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995641,0.002919232,0.00040765014,0.0000869625,0.00042091034,0.0005242024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002549349,0.00019626666,0.00033210177,0.0022425116,0.02154608,0.005322717,0.0010903977,0.0025617713,0.0023050045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049042744,0.00031101468,0.00022932362,0.005296084,0.0048937513,0.0017637174,0.002977155,0.0034818589,0.00020608521],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026016348,0.00122484,0.07183047,0.0005253813,0.000046123583,0.020274322,0.40234816,0.0014264621,0.0040535913,0.37298024,0.048554555,0.07647576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013577747,0.0003623448,0.15268444,0.0017540986,0.00015436774,0.002428075,0.35311127,0.0030653498,0.0027503439,0.031437844,0.45193288,0.0001832608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3495668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63075197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3495668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018711725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012990358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6950642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742011336","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2017.12","title":"Should the Injustice Done to Her be the Law’s Concern? The Case of Cinderella","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Harm; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Mistake; Sociology; Political science; Economic Justice; Settlement (finance); Business","score_opus":0.10124538374452363,"score_gpt":0.36336047326480053,"score_spread":0.2621150895202769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742011336","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09221598,0.0072251386,0.004843986,0.2448106,0.001391071,0.00008410095,0.000046405818,0.00004906239,0.64933366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8087211,0.0019011508,0.001892216,0.0758229,0.00031445187,0.000093662995,0.000016421076,0.000040000625,0.11119808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567646,0.0010069909,0.00007852851,0.00068729086,0.000917781,0.0016329759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997335,0.0013606779,0.00020800818,0.00019543448,0.0005924511,0.00030836015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003738818,0.00038577206,0.00044533197,0.0011934834,0.021446867,0.007755937,0.0023576801,0.01183156,0.0055175805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012251028,0.0003322712,0.00044001592,0.0006639634,0.027390312,0.0067975386,0.005264794,0.013092935,0.00055503246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013441008,0.0000123601385,0.0008935852,0.00003035913,0.0000058774153,0.0014889892,0.02531861,0.00011238102,0.00022039427,0.95590365,0.010250615,0.0057497392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025651838,0.00004782204,0.0020983715,0.00084134133,0.00005182268,0.0023687778,0.06469986,0.0005466688,0.0014262552,0.22434914,0.70341676,0.00012755414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34601748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38576925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34601748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017171333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012907939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6880069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751295992","doi":"","title":"Something to Talk About: Applying the Unwritten Principle of Democracy to Secure a Constitutional Right to Access Government Information in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Constitutional right; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Access to information; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science; Politics; Information access; Constitution; Philosophy; Library science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.016209689655768314,"score_gpt":0.3227719313577834,"score_spread":0.3065622417020151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751295992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12726194,0.0061041038,0.0123891365,0.26254445,0.00079377653,0.00035337763,0.0003979347,0.000106253276,0.590049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92183733,0.0031465357,0.00503578,0.011963445,0.00011624088,0.000079340934,0.00009493522,0.000055270284,0.057671092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891481,0.002061395,0.00029461473,0.0008223,0.004112774,0.003560805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903564,0.0035983135,0.00033532022,0.0004927489,0.004022061,0.0011951508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065782885,0.00034887806,0.0006082217,0.0014036709,0.028019153,0.013637214,0.002267828,0.004610546,0.006004313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017525068,0.00052671274,0.00048076606,0.0022979567,0.023176027,0.0033169675,0.005190606,0.008968536,0.00039744965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019693594,0.000015217971,0.0014481655,0.000049635677,0.000011715232,0.00038921443,0.013797397,0.0012074419,0.00028989493,0.9504806,0.02172193,0.010569176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071831855,0.00003732282,0.009487405,0.0005822686,0.000072757575,0.00022095491,0.03275925,0.0067066527,0.0018768293,0.38790882,0.5599508,0.00032503414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98698527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9888391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15288208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15288208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22977638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98253673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755938","doi":"10.1097/00006676-198904000-00001","title":"A Right to Reach an Audience: An Approach to Intermediary Bias on the Internet","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Intermediary; Selection (genetic algorithm); Filter (signal processing); Internet privacy; Computer science; Internet access; Voice over IP; Class (philosophy); Business; Advertising; World Wide Web; Marketing; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04141274174560243,"score_gpt":0.297918509331501,"score_spread":0.25650576758589855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10500776,0.0012953317,0.039395444,0.0421713,0.00026680838,0.000093814095,0.00006228767,0.00030310778,0.8114043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93987197,0.00064618746,0.0074118655,0.0027105971,0.00027790733,0.000104201725,0.00001751524,0.000104838975,0.04885503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772817,0.0013805955,0.000049296155,0.00023527975,0.00034459468,0.0002621113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944062,0.0033038699,0.0003830716,0.0007800796,0.0004440912,0.00068267755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036990636,0.0002517963,0.00023809225,0.0016259041,0.0032820033,0.007626665,0.0009229256,0.0029026114,0.02803415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009118159,0.000211111,0.0002648823,0.0009780863,0.010352897,0.011369361,0.0052486067,0.0021294493,0.0022142902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066520144,0.000061825514,0.0015661297,0.00003948095,0.000004087514,0.00023476381,0.0072400495,0.0001896382,0.0011127283,0.9487932,0.004008728,0.036682755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087402565,0.00014186729,0.0022347418,0.00018413276,0.000030232552,0.0005870928,0.014999153,0.0036794152,0.0027976865,0.7403838,0.23482774,0.000046769528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014819681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002229307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02803415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020002555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016291062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09378356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767896693","doi":"","title":"Of Unreasonable Searches and Seizures: A Blueprint for a Constitutional Challenge to the Security of Canada Information Sharing Act","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint; Information sharing; Political science; Information security; Internet privacy; Computer security; Computer science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.025033924272024617,"score_gpt":0.27382342511677743,"score_spread":0.24878950084475282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767896693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07123872,0.004615255,0.014113248,0.25283307,0.0005803826,0.00020448619,0.00042206462,0.00013525228,0.6558575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9239598,0.0019151509,0.005036044,0.021301063,0.00026207796,0.00013493357,0.0001078921,0.000066774475,0.047216203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98459387,0.0031230475,0.00039225304,0.0011167239,0.0070983293,0.0036756964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98543847,0.006394205,0.00064058043,0.0014039488,0.004287697,0.0018351504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009543899,0.00045184785,0.0006514976,0.0018709734,0.019423706,0.016284052,0.0027860391,0.007657141,0.0040482907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020351985,0.00047800556,0.0005042968,0.0020004534,0.047277797,0.006219432,0.004983454,0.010487136,0.00040460084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005051185,0.0000038415847,0.00020162671,0.000007902931,0.0000016134444,0.00002813249,0.0024660523,0.00020934394,0.00004551463,0.99002403,0.0049197637,0.0020870874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053348125,0.000027158574,0.003208296,0.00048396998,0.000034088465,0.00010689461,0.013593862,0.002366694,0.0006894514,0.5670308,0.41225174,0.00015373516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9486079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9570236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10019853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10019853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27740452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72699463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W277796166","doi":"","title":"Obscurantism in Action: How the Ontario Human Rights Commission Frames Racial Profiling","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian ethnic studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Racism; Humanities; Sociology; Ethnology; Racial profiling; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Philosophy; Race (biology)","score_opus":0.1812501406239342,"score_gpt":0.3840557034588653,"score_spread":0.20280556283493112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W277796166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3381426,0.0032548453,0.0048487824,0.09357217,0.0005981429,0.00013961131,0.00019531856,0.000069708556,0.5591789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97316754,0.00059549377,0.00061353866,0.002250216,0.000042846998,0.000029623878,0.000030675266,0.00003651418,0.023233533],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99091715,0.0033503638,0.00017830517,0.00084277266,0.0021300148,0.0025814138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905503,0.0030786,0.001037948,0.0006142426,0.0024878678,0.0022309653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008125612,0.00039368946,0.00040590874,0.0016870133,0.049362104,0.014011872,0.0023643498,0.003965179,0.0063424367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010473038,0.0004802597,0.0003546148,0.0024019547,0.05544737,0.004489729,0.007697461,0.0049780966,0.00033514845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041627925,0.000022047347,0.0074029635,0.00005859818,0.000010671248,0.00051680394,0.6194653,0.0002107179,0.00047753222,0.3474635,0.013640841,0.010689439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018726096,0.000019304465,0.017079787,0.0003601342,0.00003622716,0.00012078795,0.4820853,0.0005908172,0.0005317725,0.029128682,0.4699355,0.00009284321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97761154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19765124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19765124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17185293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93061084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782245308","doi":"","title":"Privacy In A Time Of No Privacy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Information privacy; Privacy software; Computer security; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.014261607258524904,"score_gpt":0.27602856045520846,"score_spread":0.2617669531966836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782245308","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005746857,0.014165462,0.0063068257,0.6660209,0.013516106,0.000024269604,0.00008383724,0.00009167345,0.29404408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5439762,0.010004822,0.0040528323,0.16020364,0.009012338,0.0000930066,0.00007966474,0.00025518693,0.27232233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98757476,0.0061264955,0.00027664847,0.001426475,0.0024168955,0.0021788226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898436,0.0049712113,0.0005464248,0.0015479223,0.0011004072,0.0019903353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011419588,0.00058370864,0.00076197577,0.0005781259,0.015859235,0.017922144,0.0011325501,0.009025264,0.012004341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020329855,0.0004225232,0.0006918448,0.0005921007,0.04387364,0.020921597,0.008178814,0.021299744,0.0023256284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031035728,0.0000074065906,0.000069775604,0.000023047942,0.000005828989,0.00010332642,0.0030258815,0.00007606753,0.000078903264,0.9282815,0.06374331,0.0045539415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011464901,0.000026147838,0.00013424059,0.00017046988,0.0000074496893,0.00017023871,0.004276824,0.00019108297,0.00022710089,0.40734914,0.58741045,0.000025411991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00833726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009037465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017922144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011105741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08057821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785252287","doi":"","title":"Equal Participation and Campaign Finance: Comparative Perspectives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Election law; Political science; Law; Democracy; Cognitive reframing; Politics; Context (archaeology); Majority opinion","score_opus":0.02924541603720438,"score_gpt":0.34052885914488445,"score_spread":0.3112834431076801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785252287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071208426,0.117719494,0.0029620419,0.046279132,0.00065358455,0.00001691587,0.000059048387,0.000010081805,0.82517886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.811484,0.13616547,0.0019804924,0.012427662,0.004012394,0.00017449394,0.00014301695,0.00004677413,0.033565708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925297,0.0045730895,0.00011240432,0.0003224634,0.0013502656,0.0011120453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990742,0.0077630845,0.00029273445,0.00021649906,0.00065657974,0.00032902093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005364395,0.0005957337,0.0008702231,0.00815344,0.0061902353,0.015111633,0.001405632,0.0071243457,0.012972365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072924457,0.00034902376,0.0006111745,0.008733165,0.026147045,0.0108101545,0.0042009032,0.005250049,0.00061207515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003601211,0.000007207228,0.00004557959,0.000039499453,0.000001846646,0.000017907194,0.0006934056,0.000048761172,0.0000074551535,0.995195,0.0013333152,0.0026065079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002502489,0.00004458762,0.0023320382,0.0010933349,0.000020476835,0.00012601794,0.0111361,0.00048071417,0.0001294119,0.581336,0.40325305,0.000023221268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032142267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039992623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032142267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01913284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060134353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1388191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792629939","doi":"","title":"Consensus report on the Constitution: Charlottetown, August 28,1992: final text","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Genealogy; Geography; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.034681562544418516,"score_gpt":0.24904898100432518,"score_spread":0.21436741845990667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792629939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004648763,0.04843799,0.0031795672,0.29990068,0.06502713,0.0016255863,0.08569425,0.0015484021,0.48993757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029446207,0.01576351,0.0068638376,0.08067502,0.006124715,0.002510613,0.02438712,0.001091393,0.83313763],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98586893,0.0012542908,0.0011425642,0.0011047594,0.007974282,0.0026551322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97918624,0.0034719198,0.00071851606,0.0008262525,0.014161664,0.0016354137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013039801,0.0014984722,0.0017115794,0.0062437644,0.008955027,0.011958122,0.0053219097,0.02248287,0.04849599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042606052,0.0015453855,0.001508978,0.0092791105,0.002523525,0.0046955612,0.0036430052,0.0146702705,0.016600221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015861258,0.000009105818,0.000097086966,0.00011239399,0.0000042767015,0.00003263909,0.00013765613,0.000052531763,0.000038948227,0.0075322236,0.9887165,0.0032507938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002749482,0.0000039569495,0.0028619403,0.0005673598,0.000018426575,0.000023664456,0.00027109202,0.000038983842,0.00015301982,0.0014375816,0.9945538,0.000042561423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7157705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77526194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28422952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044536524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14357066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5718068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793931921","doi":"10.11575/prism/33972","title":"American and Canadian Election Laws","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Election law; Voting; Politics","score_opus":0.009326282788177633,"score_gpt":0.20346051201636503,"score_spread":0.1941342292281874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793931921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004286188,0.0056914557,0.000492956,0.017007047,0.0010105207,0.000047159352,0.0020920362,0.00007120972,0.96930146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33123848,0.02297654,0.003715832,0.03525374,0.0012765452,0.00034504855,0.0049704104,0.00020812763,0.60001534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880723,0.00072682754,0.00029687583,0.000887053,0.006975153,0.0030419398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99110025,0.0010567046,0.00033634197,0.00033174796,0.0060414583,0.001133391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003365717,0.00048670752,0.00034092888,0.006188894,0.01224816,0.0070686336,0.0014267205,0.0023823346,0.024050105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01244749,0.00024776923,0.0005333514,0.008527684,0.0045754514,0.0018054191,0.0019639463,0.0033237543,0.0029199396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017808085,0.000009694746,0.0013819328,0.00006592929,0.0000049583205,0.000052800307,0.0013744993,0.0001286318,0.00006938061,0.7263652,0.247744,0.022785164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040064183,0.0000029090106,0.006922705,0.000119252894,0.000007934101,0.000026569232,0.00057380646,0.000058815243,0.000035109806,0.006365567,0.9858667,0.000016729093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9740071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98080814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06635171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06635171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.095307976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4814176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796203741","doi":"","title":"Canada Update: A Case Involving Limitations on Free Speech; the Articling Problem and Proposed Solution; A Summary of Legislative and Upcoming Regulatory Changes: Hydrofracking, Wiretapping, and Self-Defense","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Free speech; Self defense; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.027867719171851026,"score_gpt":0.2238435181567415,"score_spread":0.19597579898489048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796203741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09486629,0.022736352,0.007295166,0.3842463,0.0032117488,0.00037316766,0.0012326888,0.00027132398,0.48576692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52030545,0.02375739,0.009462132,0.14094664,0.0009741422,0.00018820782,0.0005072867,0.00012994993,0.3037287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99520713,0.00030979278,0.00014127417,0.0003522784,0.0028476878,0.0011418185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974558,0.00081258814,0.00013483943,0.00009888027,0.0010835701,0.0004143891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021406005,0.0004953159,0.00026561672,0.001335095,0.020626672,0.006083727,0.0031064244,0.010589882,0.00510372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064289556,0.00043442112,0.0005055549,0.0015820717,0.005076787,0.0021766236,0.00193234,0.007681862,0.00046875415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038363887,0.000077681725,0.0074303453,0.00025744975,0.000023246648,0.0072795865,0.013260093,0.000677063,0.0011712271,0.53754306,0.35664418,0.07559763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025997088,0.000040585834,0.00948461,0.0004194337,0.00007780342,0.0023930715,0.016842468,0.0010267583,0.0020167676,0.014963109,0.9525352,0.0001742532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9811461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99520594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06059241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06059241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15721413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4396308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798124662","doi":"10.11575/prism/33921","title":"The Edmonton Journal and Freedom of the Press in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of the press; Freedom of information; Political science; Media studies; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.009826635608312598,"score_gpt":0.18517741066867882,"score_spread":0.17535077506036623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798124662","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008642576,0.027524324,0.00043520372,0.11223206,0.0019984967,0.000042289576,0.00054502115,0.000101690355,0.8484784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31130534,0.014716011,0.00092516025,0.037590846,0.0016371652,0.00007824095,0.00036564685,0.00021208487,0.6331695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933854,0.0004887003,0.00015606711,0.0006119176,0.0029997136,0.0023581719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931513,0.0022085025,0.00032500076,0.00046186853,0.0014654527,0.0023878433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031819663,0.00071389094,0.00067972107,0.0028022712,0.03493033,0.024450235,0.002179827,0.011205946,0.036892645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010818862,0.00088083453,0.0005004303,0.005428879,0.025303172,0.004359407,0.0073742326,0.009003808,0.0026792777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020084914,0.000028769953,0.0007341991,0.000056029872,0.0000107732385,0.00028248684,0.0020719909,0.00020296189,0.000086883374,0.80899316,0.1769181,0.010594615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027643257,0.0000076052597,0.0031560436,0.00023497954,0.000019532994,0.00007208118,0.002177991,0.00020122244,0.00010662665,0.05919368,0.93474215,0.00006048181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9762646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98459125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100181855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100181855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22193682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72687364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806466280","doi":"","title":"Exploring the Censorship of Jay Asher’s Thirteen Reasons Why","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; History; Internet privacy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08383666709585202,"score_gpt":0.2697912877471279,"score_spread":0.18595462065127588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806466280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13581511,0.00868557,0.0073816227,0.25421992,0.0011771665,0.000052131316,0.00015191472,0.00011463438,0.592402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367994,0.0016708815,0.00076571776,0.016020626,0.00019714634,0.000024226496,0.000024677593,0.00013060462,0.0443666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921165,0.0038548422,0.00022155917,0.00091681717,0.0014274156,0.0014628721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739212,0.01774066,0.0019352825,0.0021042784,0.0025794317,0.0017192055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011019463,0.0002964841,0.0004489419,0.0010903557,0.020583825,0.015263099,0.0019650562,0.006747997,0.00851863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034636438,0.0005003168,0.0002885993,0.0013427057,0.03540169,0.011539453,0.005232186,0.009327546,0.001122137],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025659348,0.000012885964,0.0016526681,0.000058422997,0.000013427668,0.0006645213,0.17938313,0.0000899614,0.00014471916,0.74949694,0.058025815,0.010431835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017852633,0.000015309406,0.0034014287,0.00052841584,0.000026159418,0.0007857486,0.16862077,0.00039135627,0.00074183516,0.14938605,0.6760106,0.000074476695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06608476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15714437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06608476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010930778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00702755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13140017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810014282","doi":"","title":"OBSTACLES TO CROSSING THE DISCRIMINATION THRESHOLD: CONNECTING INDIVIDUAL EXCLUSION TO GROUP-BASED INEQUALITIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Prejudice (legal term); Presumption; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.09414513416010219,"score_gpt":0.34463123741232127,"score_spread":0.2504861032522191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810014282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2137258,0.018874755,0.024006208,0.26337555,0.00065049785,0.00015657186,0.00045531517,0.000059796137,0.47869548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838951,0.0017315891,0.0015705257,0.009661741,0.00017522002,0.000042864474,0.00003534217,0.000014249627,0.0028733888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865485,0.002968184,0.00042473018,0.0020017626,0.0047996184,0.0032572807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97646755,0.0150090335,0.0021070496,0.0015871456,0.0031972874,0.0016319653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013023499,0.0002829061,0.00082005514,0.0038178167,0.008153198,0.00928082,0.0023025824,0.0066899043,0.0043372824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03381141,0.00036322197,0.0007064113,0.002917331,0.05660107,0.009134809,0.007882839,0.010600434,0.00021147504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014230422,0.0000141726705,0.0042052055,0.000051917028,0.000012576376,0.00016713007,0.0028889799,0.00018537264,0.000064492604,0.98069674,0.0017693856,0.009929913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020827481,0.000023639193,0.012382108,0.00039782355,0.000026563968,0.00016378755,0.0059315264,0.0006609606,0.00019919044,0.9527233,0.027433706,0.000036494017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29859054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3435249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29859054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021853281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02240503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59370506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W282048792","doi":"","title":"Locating the Mislaid Gate: Revitalizing Tinker by Repairing Judicial Overgeneralizations of Technologically Enabled Student Speech","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Humiliation; Lawsuit; Tinker; Media studies; Art; Sociology; Art history; Political science","score_opus":0.022980525273595384,"score_gpt":0.27645351797139595,"score_spread":0.25347299269780055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W282048792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12459084,0.0045798146,0.04839484,0.21610548,0.010857326,0.00019059516,0.00013865101,0.0030888834,0.59205353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76469266,0.0016997551,0.00699376,0.047723964,0.0018157852,0.00013785681,0.000082702376,0.002121072,0.17473246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870331,0.006164428,0.0004221113,0.0016541258,0.0031183572,0.0016079666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96910167,0.013015011,0.0015297234,0.0066696457,0.006799571,0.0028843358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014155507,0.00054655614,0.00041290084,0.0020076719,0.021002127,0.014866247,0.0033374734,0.007950971,0.020981634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0617909,0.00046903978,0.00039621885,0.00089715683,0.021873916,0.015123126,0.013209557,0.013046247,0.007163036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079985766,0.00012329881,0.0041205394,0.00016631687,0.000014013011,0.0017119317,0.27610096,0.00028465444,0.0021839954,0.30153704,0.27963156,0.13404575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010038393,0.00005295063,0.0008854523,0.00050250377,0.000013213807,0.0007638934,0.1005101,0.00074554526,0.0017132397,0.019649392,0.8751074,0.00004627143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017149698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030259432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021002127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069277976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0113896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07486236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890681678","doi":"","title":"The \"Privilege of Speech\" in a \"Pleasantly Authoritarian Country\": How Canada's Judiciary Allowed Laws Proscribing Discourse Critical of Homosexuality to Trump Free Speech and Religious Liberty","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vanderbilt journal of transnational law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Privilege (computing); Law; Political science; Homosexuality; Free speech; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.015571917943953326,"score_gpt":0.28784146575535335,"score_spread":0.2722695478114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890681678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44734532,0.0009429698,0.00413057,0.086100735,0.0004903466,0.00005130114,0.00009392701,0.000084794905,0.46076003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98203963,0.00011390716,0.0003181565,0.0044997972,0.000031444848,0.000012856161,0.000009867442,0.000053554522,0.0129206795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99408084,0.0021769416,0.00008679262,0.0005838409,0.00067875447,0.0023927877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924791,0.0040999106,0.00037353614,0.00039365917,0.0010453691,0.0016084538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006337075,0.00033878643,0.00043555646,0.0009999331,0.05841607,0.023779314,0.002397276,0.0077031883,0.0077811475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013190818,0.0004975823,0.00043306017,0.0012653683,0.06108358,0.0062015834,0.008978447,0.016267179,0.00042463254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030137895,0.000026734839,0.0013608015,0.000015834023,0.000007839494,0.00027295292,0.39185944,0.00016829281,0.0002878894,0.59302986,0.008660428,0.0042797695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005839015,0.000032345524,0.006578133,0.00028364762,0.00007333705,0.00019547743,0.57580817,0.0009251713,0.0012376925,0.11699475,0.2976741,0.00013885558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90625185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9630097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09374815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05647019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.084691964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4097218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896066287","doi":"","title":"Trashcans and Constitutional Custodians: The Liminal Spaces of Privacy in the Wake of Patrick","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Expectation of privacy; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Charter; Constitutional court; Privacy policy; Right to privacy; The Right to Privacy; Information privacy; Sociology; Constitution; Human rights","score_opus":0.013049852097072512,"score_gpt":0.2651364226690756,"score_spread":0.2520865705720031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896066287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14319077,0.0070251767,0.027028115,0.35547212,0.0011409573,0.000060648017,0.000108973996,0.00007019477,0.465903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95942324,0.0009970015,0.0016433505,0.023374459,0.00051430793,0.00004016503,0.000013716369,0.000037575846,0.01395617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99050355,0.00445287,0.00026200124,0.0012801464,0.0020274878,0.001473994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99044526,0.007301023,0.0005968112,0.00062361645,0.0006323364,0.00040085972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011069054,0.00031012495,0.00045432325,0.0008113408,0.011998648,0.014884512,0.0019892068,0.011664187,0.0045881066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022137318,0.0005557426,0.0006636888,0.0009427089,0.045226783,0.014091133,0.007860983,0.020057514,0.00031302738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008380155,0.0000035978037,0.000104795865,0.000005181124,0.0000012335365,0.00012445578,0.0028217924,0.000082225415,0.000042848635,0.99362683,0.0017470543,0.0014316271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024033827,0.000042671214,0.00067052676,0.00018600802,0.000016825583,0.00021319377,0.0072611254,0.0008215395,0.00074989157,0.89950025,0.090458095,0.000055818316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01852101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0194116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01852101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006424233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067366096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05853951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898470522","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3293","title":"Narrating Dignity: Islamophobia, Racial Profiling, and National Security Before the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Bombardier (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Islamophobia; Dignity; Supreme court; Political science; Racial profiling; Law; Racism; Profiling (computer programming); Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies; Politics; Race (biology); Computer science","score_opus":0.015757145107875122,"score_gpt":0.26223610660637453,"score_spread":0.2464789614984994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898470522","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21300839,0.009403579,0.001384473,0.40920192,0.0028919403,0.00006514192,0.00023623098,0.000060173046,0.3637482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9070251,0.0019685756,0.00020655952,0.04546974,0.00050538575,0.000035818335,0.000034655557,0.00005269179,0.044701528],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607086,0.00087407755,0.000046313282,0.0003064198,0.0009176517,0.0017847258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961189,0.001994494,0.0001918343,0.0000951341,0.00087113463,0.0007285491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022568828,0.00051612564,0.0005693956,0.00089910324,0.078502804,0.01087553,0.0026318443,0.013733257,0.0031831025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006804914,0.00038518867,0.0003095634,0.0012597296,0.033436663,0.0029871757,0.0036826092,0.01747661,0.00040086798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039661136,0.000030167537,0.0012566086,0.000048544232,0.000010106441,0.0042873365,0.5629636,0.00019578893,0.00044251845,0.28392765,0.14090638,0.005891671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013402747,0.000019562985,0.0020614536,0.00038717058,0.000021612264,0.00067986693,0.46084458,0.0003660227,0.0006196662,0.016258758,0.518626,0.00010195938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92617154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9506614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078502804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05776394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044582505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4191087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899508936","doi":"","title":"Oral History Interview: Michael Zaleski (1172)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Defense attorney; Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.04667475235259733,"score_gpt":0.2657093542941508,"score_spread":0.2190346019415535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899508936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09107786,0.012171107,0.0022059088,0.18588635,0.012357116,0.0039049725,0.016608221,0.0006093817,0.67517906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13134687,0.005973573,0.0016361388,0.03980792,0.0012148834,0.003885053,0.0021956107,0.00023985683,0.81370014],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995592,0.00012202365,0.000028026308,0.00007908384,0.000095897645,0.00011577551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908626,0.00021483807,0.000097162956,0.000029291588,0.00034361982,0.00022878076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008840099,0.000549678,0.0003665803,0.0012237757,0.006582297,0.002152997,0.0005225953,0.0021380007,0.17010716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005269316,0.0006109777,0.00017565711,0.0012951887,0.00084019813,0.0029073763,0.0018910024,0.0038157552,0.04217101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055264743,0.00003625031,0.0010218242,0.00017196497,0.0000013292973,0.0011312597,0.041284602,0.00002097235,0.0004735172,0.0012990567,0.934781,0.019722877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011424272,0.000021594835,0.0034410653,0.000225794,0.0000018580625,0.00043398986,0.06250277,0.000030157447,0.00018287798,0.00024262354,0.9328887,0.000017191342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045053307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09677848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17010716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040913303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003851884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5690651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899888614","doi":"10.29173/psur6","title":"Mandatory Voting: The Wrong Response to Low Voter Turnout","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Voting; Political science; Voter turnout; Democracy; Population; Public administration; Disapproval voting; Demographic economics; Politics; Political economy; Economics; Law; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.05329926684197198,"score_gpt":0.3616219751488923,"score_spread":0.3083227083069203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899888614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10328264,0.20872273,0.009563561,0.46546912,0.0065096486,0.00063523796,0.0011960978,0.00026890205,0.2043521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.820741,0.05780204,0.003742651,0.10363652,0.0018968146,0.000315578,0.00027682417,0.00010952111,0.0114790825],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98169637,0.011736856,0.0009262312,0.00095380744,0.0036054433,0.0010812085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9505521,0.027067345,0.0067406027,0.0019190848,0.012168138,0.0015526785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021128885,0.00019705233,0.0006141643,0.0012102298,0.0010227939,0.0013428817,0.0011734661,0.0015273119,0.0046483893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074582,0.00025512924,0.00050811074,0.0013754121,0.003141014,0.0009931012,0.0012992925,0.0024558415,0.00070925563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003226628,0.000110919675,0.04568752,0.009138582,0.0006463338,0.00025684864,0.004737563,0.00041722707,0.001187347,0.1108602,0.15636136,0.67027336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037748166,0.000692093,0.22775017,0.01666366,0.00067290245,0.00066314003,0.0069472166,0.000553507,0.0019362196,0.049593937,0.6940526,0.00009714086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03626701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09108545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03626701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039657005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062608207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11174154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901959319","doi":"10.30958/ajl.2-4-1","title":"The “Right” to Privacy? - The Debate over the United States Government’s Control over its Cyberspace","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Athens Journal of Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stony Brook University; York University","keywords":"Cyberspace; Government (linguistics); Internet privacy; Control (management); Political science; Public administration; Computer security; Business; The Internet; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.015826127858152957,"score_gpt":0.2703113973673847,"score_spread":0.2544852695092317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901959319","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022140551,0.011008012,0.007506837,0.7833742,0.0016067439,0.000017595492,0.00008581096,0.000032390944,0.1742278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8771148,0.005963614,0.0020278299,0.09879254,0.0020529036,0.00006413302,0.000043934782,0.000043299988,0.013897014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882112,0.006658647,0.0002865981,0.0017343188,0.0020233265,0.001085895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863523,0.009816648,0.00066727865,0.0014289719,0.0011221961,0.0006126053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013052068,0.00033426902,0.00044613823,0.0008931005,0.00836912,0.0171921,0.0013197918,0.010605771,0.0044609113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013758293,0.00033681278,0.00065638847,0.0012106276,0.047629144,0.019700544,0.005040447,0.014031649,0.00073169963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006528479,0.000006233381,0.00019260988,0.000015528227,0.0000031734353,0.000033930937,0.0022830057,0.000044552406,0.00004673926,0.98551685,0.007686829,0.004163962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012418406,0.000024402189,0.00062233,0.0004169165,0.000012420063,0.00017422561,0.007986614,0.0002997177,0.00041920776,0.78818893,0.20181511,0.000027667973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009259256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062572025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0171921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049272077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063302387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06902671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903123368","doi":"","title":"Suicide In Law Enforcement: Protecting Those Who Serve","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Calhoun: The Naval Postgraduate School Institutional Archive (Naval Postgraduate School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law enforcement; Computer security; Business; Law; Enforcement; Internet privacy; Criminology; Political science; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.043855384850459714,"score_gpt":0.317889980942153,"score_spread":0.2740345960916933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903123368","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09874901,0.11048094,0.00456344,0.650678,0.008481997,0.00056632806,0.00014852548,0.00012047842,0.12621133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62836194,0.21683373,0.013390423,0.10947408,0.0041780495,0.0012123068,0.0002744459,0.000121340614,0.026153727],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98820555,0.007426148,0.00093255896,0.0004545931,0.0020608848,0.0009203145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97999406,0.009069817,0.0030920568,0.001120862,0.004434625,0.0022885117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014581277,0.00034712005,0.0004778753,0.0022769861,0.013617122,0.008372381,0.0020985364,0.004469596,0.0035806564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04319929,0.00041347533,0.00039311606,0.0021070442,0.007505482,0.010966215,0.0065830797,0.006172732,0.00079669914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040187442,0.00031853354,0.022225387,0.0036111318,0.000036532158,0.0017351301,0.26844865,0.00016380394,0.00052064355,0.06726019,0.14868009,0.48695967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017880317,0.0001995543,0.012223042,0.013008885,0.000037363643,0.0011727109,0.4097194,0.0001271574,0.00060645177,0.013470019,0.54936355,0.00005397416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018829064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039287817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018829064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005047313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030536251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077114105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2926861112","doi":"10.7202/1058192ar","title":"Law Enforcement Access to Encrypted Data: Legislative Responses and the Charter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Encryption; Enforcement; Charter; Law enforcement; Law; Legislature; Perpetuity; Context (archaeology); Computer security; Internet privacy; Political science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.07273824518349938,"score_gpt":0.34704594891788465,"score_spread":0.2743077037343853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2926861112","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047287155,0.004056854,0.026525434,0.6758965,0.0039528864,0.0003209075,0.00013545563,0.00040103722,0.24142376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7275233,0.0031742726,0.016089804,0.20850363,0.004558939,0.00059946923,0.00010367007,0.00020746108,0.039239403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94167876,0.02698385,0.004025668,0.006727791,0.014858433,0.005725569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88284826,0.08107431,0.010191022,0.009903718,0.0132324835,0.00275009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07480142,0.0006192927,0.00071540795,0.0023184812,0.014131637,0.020594379,0.0040302034,0.027306655,0.005686551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13092858,0.0010962187,0.0015622259,0.0017942548,0.03439748,0.017112043,0.009191496,0.024322713,0.0010159333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026511005,0.00006309952,0.0008590242,0.000047910642,0.000010655113,0.00027812205,0.0057127,0.00044543023,0.00042879567,0.9621272,0.021645712,0.008354933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016069808,0.000283467,0.0040410827,0.0010949721,0.000098518074,0.0005957431,0.010212323,0.0038643496,0.002888829,0.41429904,0.5620843,0.00037663602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016301744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013474201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07480142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009671481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018796712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39559245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W293994410","doi":"","title":"Agents of Repression: Withstanding the Test of Time","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice A Journal of Crime Conflict & World Order","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Law; Prison; Government (linguistics); Test (biology); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04412943831105571,"score_gpt":0.34032038985000596,"score_spread":0.29619095153895025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W293994410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028031837,0.016562374,0.010331132,0.09392526,0.0042107264,0.00004782594,0.000068181216,0.00020284342,0.8466199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79762244,0.0051683336,0.0024732868,0.014369585,0.0020053284,0.00016420083,0.000079245205,0.00040883443,0.17770873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99411386,0.0030420343,0.00016969572,0.0007546352,0.0009590236,0.00096065894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937836,0.0024777318,0.0008582293,0.0010594889,0.00075152225,0.0010694392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070436834,0.00054543465,0.0006198591,0.0008577319,0.011398564,0.022737218,0.001938194,0.0035378628,0.011695831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011386545,0.0003358361,0.00039160007,0.000999876,0.04738538,0.02154362,0.010210274,0.009169034,0.0023622573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004137379,0.000013142239,0.00024513478,0.00003359165,0.0000044308867,0.000092866336,0.02503571,0.000056377983,0.00012041638,0.9507987,0.014009342,0.009548949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025363646,0.00004695158,0.00032456304,0.0003266144,0.000010493732,0.00019068345,0.023955857,0.00022028471,0.0004211975,0.24255656,0.7318953,0.000026017853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038240678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040550907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022737218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008878393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067303586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06441754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945103424","doi":"","title":"Youth Agency and the Culture of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Law; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.03331488264837214,"score_gpt":0.253395015211292,"score_spread":0.22008013256291986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945103424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49486575,0.0053353417,0.0016968233,0.066421345,0.0005408952,0.00007018925,0.00016088452,0.00008256217,0.43082607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748113,0.00230761,0.00027445104,0.0016107763,0.000035440862,0.000023825067,0.000029841496,0.000020968839,0.020885669],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662966,0.0014523835,0.000060781713,0.00014771541,0.0006400001,0.001069439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701226,0.00039019823,0.0003132175,0.000094559546,0.0004983751,0.0016914012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027792212,0.0002096159,0.00025113125,0.0007601543,0.018170528,0.010724457,0.00077497953,0.00086499634,0.005168766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028990335,0.00022752446,0.0001749167,0.00085314485,0.02091813,0.0025182911,0.0046695797,0.0031178454,0.00039165103],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021625125,0.000105867475,0.027150728,0.00007076569,0.000010587519,0.00037865774,0.56535566,0.00020926038,0.0004327101,0.30904156,0.053156164,0.044066492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064602764,0.000034191915,0.02273244,0.00039300288,0.000009308248,0.00020334058,0.4445003,0.0002245762,0.00044650878,0.015165138,0.5162555,0.00002923117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6566198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8251195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6566198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03093982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046664685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69080484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947337155","doi":"10.36643/mjrl.24.2.virtual","title":"Virtual Hatred: How Russia Tried to Start a Race War in the United States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of Race & Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre for Engineering Research and Development; McGill University","keywords":"Hatred; Politics; Presidential election; Democracy; Racism; Political science; Nationalism; Xenophobia; Presidential system; Law; Public opinion; Persona; Sociology","score_opus":0.0141151370943991,"score_gpt":0.2579790512883151,"score_spread":0.243863914193916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947337155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86774635,0.0009605019,0.0015718692,0.01419253,0.0008089684,0.000021895577,0.000046375226,0.00006619583,0.1145853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98633665,0.00042689272,0.00018802733,0.0019359465,0.0000674926,0.0000086181335,0.000026207295,0.00003847248,0.010971677],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769634,0.0014273706,0.000036732705,0.00016724304,0.00021982718,0.00045244978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904305,0.0004090337,0.00014016368,0.000082936036,0.00009471999,0.00023006984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020279489,0.00043513897,0.0002817981,0.0006297718,0.017991232,0.00800279,0.00078798167,0.0023102588,0.0047734412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004037359,0.00028523308,0.00040477753,0.00043134976,0.008210062,0.0050819414,0.005151237,0.0049907444,0.0009493613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021242209,0.00021770001,0.023548339,0.00013393728,0.00008314785,0.0032364514,0.82818335,0.00068902416,0.0026247231,0.06362816,0.033516217,0.043926585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027411363,0.00024114996,0.016552508,0.00030236685,0.00007766631,0.00092536083,0.68816555,0.0015033997,0.0019593027,0.010135786,0.28002435,0.00008519114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020525564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030047392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020525564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004067811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014432617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040812194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954009616","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1368","title":"B.C. Freedom of Information and Privacy Assn. v. British Columbia (Attorney General): Mandatory Registration Rules, and Limits on Third Party Political Expression under the Charter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Dilemma; Democracy","score_opus":0.02213353209609633,"score_gpt":0.26596642299843887,"score_spread":0.24383289090234253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954009616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05510846,0.008328294,0.0020805504,0.072842285,0.0022019527,0.0008736858,0.01123277,0.0005622336,0.84676963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27479538,0.0039331615,0.004424094,0.15060556,0.0003842341,0.00094723137,0.002495446,0.000120653756,0.56229424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99544513,0.00022353297,0.00020337658,0.00035772522,0.0018236758,0.0019466276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99574727,0.0011906883,0.00016502361,0.00016133372,0.0021553156,0.0005805054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019250893,0.0005297208,0.00045603566,0.0013976716,0.017239982,0.00564939,0.0020519432,0.013478746,0.009912972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049894373,0.0009432489,0.0007709434,0.0016851657,0.0026651693,0.001111286,0.0010625573,0.0064388406,0.0026152781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015974537,0.00017057023,0.008638702,0.00035874386,0.000042037253,0.0014414467,0.0039889943,0.00076235115,0.0026274063,0.23703578,0.71668506,0.028089141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014852344,0.000082826184,0.048094396,0.000437326,0.00011672635,0.00031123258,0.0018494827,0.00085810287,0.0017989962,0.0095486855,0.93650615,0.00024760957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98379403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.994408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031242387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031242387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073929235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22668046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963043698","doi":"10.29173/alr2543","title":"Reconstitutions of Harm: Novel Applications of the Labaye Test Since 2005","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Supreme court; Circumstantial evidence; Test (biology); Normative; Construct (python library); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.021781613755822563,"score_gpt":0.2902567064906436,"score_spread":0.26847509273482106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963043698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077775314,0.012020418,0.12468995,0.11800275,0.003029083,0.00040450715,0.00038510098,0.00023653022,0.6634563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9142096,0.0042641135,0.029501813,0.025029466,0.001488282,0.0005425018,0.00014776862,0.00017304198,0.024643347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752525,0.012563158,0.0013108713,0.003085527,0.0063915043,0.0013965362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9574412,0.030564018,0.002936277,0.0051683383,0.003408048,0.00048200862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024595132,0.0005147878,0.0014147015,0.0040994873,0.0057644537,0.008882199,0.0035196454,0.008951092,0.0053429417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07955186,0.00058809033,0.0015097514,0.003507716,0.042956494,0.017485939,0.012847929,0.013782358,0.00093135505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012793408,0.00000976391,0.0004819172,0.000029117231,0.0000057309694,0.00021523485,0.0021571538,0.000076696495,0.00006344189,0.98478204,0.0021445605,0.01002169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027146812,0.000051521147,0.001715364,0.0003960875,0.000039390605,0.0011189873,0.0029004815,0.00096354424,0.0007100086,0.8901922,0.101813056,0.000072088296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049375473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056229443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024595132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060945405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004721653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13007301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987270352","doi":"","title":"Free Speech, Reputation, and the Canadian Balance","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Free speech; Reputation; Linguistics; Business; Political science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009206030735952568,"score_gpt":0.23278469886632003,"score_spread":0.22357866813036745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987270352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10389398,0.0071633263,0.0006292378,0.083305866,0.0004965723,0.00003136913,0.00080131885,0.000056153352,0.8036222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.940441,0.0016006005,0.00016101364,0.002704131,0.00017665449,0.00000837898,0.000096409516,0.000029024897,0.05478279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665195,0.00029998415,0.00007327015,0.00033280932,0.0013788991,0.0012630661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928186,0.0014445402,0.00043274194,0.00021085663,0.0030175373,0.0020757474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031385154,0.00027711003,0.0005067953,0.0035391722,0.01949178,0.013523177,0.0011581591,0.0033495051,0.02657494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015848054,0.00021796692,0.00027622504,0.0043598977,0.00748409,0.0034878564,0.0020343396,0.0038069405,0.0007663238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012533859,0.000036604928,0.009339893,0.00003252882,0.000018651393,0.00012154582,0.0039486266,0.00045639457,0.00009851111,0.8955685,0.0560068,0.034246653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016023731,0.00006665818,0.11017087,0.0005039372,0.00014951563,0.00020996813,0.02238423,0.0028496045,0.0006272162,0.31126082,0.5513293,0.00028769666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97806245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98698133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0748758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0748758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.078830145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5432645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990557264","doi":"10.21991/cf29389","title":"Advocacy Notwithstanding the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Paradigm shift; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Frame (networking); Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02057622548626431,"score_gpt":0.2752041373246879,"score_spread":0.2546279118384236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990557264","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01769317,0.0027132775,0.025797727,0.5592756,0.0044266833,0.0001096076,0.000065307155,0.00006845599,0.38985014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70861316,0.0020578625,0.012295109,0.222185,0.005611107,0.00041671973,0.00007293589,0.00013298004,0.04861507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98388517,0.0075523355,0.00053411286,0.0021004514,0.004220227,0.0017075946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975833,0.017187381,0.0017710835,0.0021979515,0.0020785716,0.00093202526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025760716,0.00040204328,0.0007645812,0.0009859133,0.0074188365,0.008512023,0.0018342756,0.014762871,0.00870814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04961096,0.00030427804,0.0008209473,0.0006292735,0.02002752,0.011947958,0.006958762,0.015725806,0.001327968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005525885,0.000008104024,0.00013567631,0.000016005455,0.0000035538906,0.00004502144,0.00069512887,0.000043721004,0.00007980968,0.989082,0.007052226,0.0028332602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002763789,0.00002616216,0.00024296017,0.000213765,0.000018590255,0.00012286958,0.0010047137,0.00043559636,0.00036750044,0.77694386,0.22057968,0.000016705153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025546665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026465468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99744534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003295616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00655881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13623726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999015995","doi":"10.29173/mlj1108","title":"Flaming Misogyny or Blindly Zealous Enforcement? The Bizarre Case of R v George","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"George (robot); Enforcement; Art; Law; Political science; Art history","score_opus":0.02540600826324478,"score_gpt":0.2848632776084346,"score_spread":0.2594572693451898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999015995","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119871154,0.003466033,0.0013531098,0.66278946,0.001467387,0.00008497407,0.00006410461,0.000042676293,0.21086118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6546447,0.0015019866,0.0006909876,0.29722208,0.00059209793,0.00007731878,0.000017973101,0.000063060266,0.045189667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954657,0.0010119508,0.00010175708,0.00052902463,0.00063575077,0.0022559431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942736,0.0021685648,0.00047287697,0.0003986142,0.00061202,0.0020742635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008046483,0.00051401946,0.0008145719,0.0012306308,0.031076608,0.009780661,0.0024492631,0.032143105,0.0055849124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01796763,0.00096504536,0.00050994114,0.0011875418,0.03323265,0.0051332954,0.0071314727,0.02865596,0.000868364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104485254,0.00008130246,0.009080503,0.000049382463,0.00005082831,0.010211476,0.028942535,0.0002943071,0.0008433186,0.8550039,0.08634553,0.008992353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022702488,0.0001053217,0.0120586185,0.0011375921,0.00017582116,0.008906139,0.106130466,0.0010297729,0.0020535355,0.3624453,0.5053729,0.00035761684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38070467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.55375063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38070467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012811501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036157273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75697744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999382501","doi":"10.54119/alr.qnkm8281","title":"Unchartered Territory for the \"Bluegrass State\": Lessons to be Learned from Over a Quarter-Century of State Charter School Legislation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arkansas law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Legislation; Quarter (Canadian coin); Charter; Political science; History; Law; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04937956011769515,"score_gpt":0.32420581083099675,"score_spread":0.2748262507133016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999382501","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035823807,0.069324546,0.0024447157,0.7590616,0.0023890692,0.000012678899,0.000086471046,0.00007013626,0.13078696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72649044,0.06270956,0.0023645437,0.14328106,0.002021518,0.00004470615,0.00010378206,0.000119291915,0.06286509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729306,0.0013826545,0.00005727419,0.0002497262,0.0005160122,0.0005013347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960788,0.0026374208,0.000143632,0.00021219035,0.0005480685,0.00037978424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056676664,0.00015871081,0.00031112973,0.00056298,0.008678742,0.01094338,0.00076495,0.004014419,0.0048816865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058707846,0.00017474867,0.00022611616,0.0006733143,0.017743295,0.008127511,0.002610556,0.007041976,0.00040548024],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002323163,0.000055128334,0.0015180353,0.00013870964,0.00001104994,0.00021950182,0.02131829,0.000406134,0.00021549164,0.73884785,0.14235787,0.094888784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071545574,0.000026783408,0.0036975858,0.00073986815,0.000011064711,0.00005829206,0.024895687,0.0001884167,0.00016348615,0.12919517,0.8409779,0.00003865936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103005275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22061783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103005275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009303035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019943813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20481145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W299939199","doi":"","title":"La Migra in the Mirror: Immigration Enforcement, Racial Profiling, and the Psychology of One Mexican Chasing after Another","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racial profiling; Immigration; Law enforcement; Law; Criminology; Population; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Enforcement; Profiling (computer programming); Immigration law; Gender studies; Race (biology); Demography","score_opus":0.02874774233683494,"score_gpt":0.34512731950447856,"score_spread":0.31637957716764364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W299939199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5960713,0.017267346,0.00058896584,0.31414717,0.0011877666,0.000030339415,0.000035540797,0.00003135388,0.0706401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969396,0.003248025,0.00019062967,0.021343129,0.0002712584,0.000024732524,0.000010650583,0.00001408416,0.005501471],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778134,0.0016073965,0.000029996903,0.00013044235,0.00020433367,0.00024648686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745494,0.0012021549,0.0006466642,0.00012790848,0.00022947267,0.0003389364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043315412,0.00023327881,0.00030527267,0.00081330223,0.015449462,0.0072598797,0.00084771035,0.003031313,0.0025704694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005337056,0.00028860918,0.00030214095,0.0006612499,0.014156107,0.007058162,0.003986823,0.0059984103,0.00019647318],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007661834,0.00017508265,0.020110143,0.000103822706,0.000026592235,0.0006106901,0.86922365,0.000028669443,0.00043523934,0.05692988,0.031639878,0.020639835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016513322,0.000055812307,0.021424636,0.0003880837,0.000019481737,0.0003047695,0.920165,0.00009804804,0.00010688686,0.007596506,0.04979406,0.000030230734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018464884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036323003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018464884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034774872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018069777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03671485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003473356","doi":"10.4324/9780429288654-8","title":"From the doorstep to the database","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Database; Computer science","score_opus":0.03784562603916155,"score_gpt":0.27234723731494653,"score_spread":0.23450161127578498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003473356","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014690708,0.007404914,0.08656058,0.016846215,0.0028996842,0.00034761266,0.01119264,0.012806788,0.86047244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031112388,0.009629828,0.0669226,0.0100090355,0.0010337866,0.00035241345,0.01588218,0.011362596,0.8536952],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974312,0.0003183064,0.00013716625,0.00054160645,0.0012924178,0.0002791749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99583495,0.000609142,0.00008111319,0.0015103723,0.0013963813,0.0005680644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022926007,0.00062994944,0.0009125315,0.0027054455,0.0044715717,0.016905123,0.0039844285,0.0025292917,0.16582523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009030651,0.0008594778,0.0005808372,0.005941297,0.0027419953,0.020025846,0.0077127037,0.0047144876,0.17768086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004667158,0.000024162058,0.00028947226,0.00019311617,0.0000077253235,0.00012412707,0.001190857,0.00015528586,0.0006003684,0.27578586,0.5333124,0.18826999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013593343,0.0000013548937,0.000033424443,0.000045310215,0.0000011423502,0.000029069224,0.000115076546,0.000056364683,0.000103548,0.0065230103,0.993086,0.0000044130807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072108746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07187367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16582523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006123446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010510092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55474067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011947477","doi":"","title":"The Dartmouth Schools Question and the Supreme Court ofNova Scotia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legal history; Nova scotia; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.012767360362670406,"score_gpt":0.2688707710326621,"score_spread":0.2561034106699917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011947477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31069508,0.0060050613,0.00037360878,0.22292788,0.00127903,0.00007073151,0.00040160507,0.000030454394,0.4582166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85528886,0.0007191395,0.00018895754,0.042928465,0.00037516459,0.000043827917,0.00005773435,0.000034832134,0.10036293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467236,0.00081013516,0.00010396009,0.0006696829,0.00074973283,0.0029940961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929213,0.0031547653,0.00040275653,0.00031966317,0.0011402307,0.0020613447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038603274,0.0002664639,0.0007249211,0.0013041028,0.036914006,0.01502857,0.0021457798,0.015183406,0.01706076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014272672,0.0008751558,0.00049663655,0.0014953534,0.01112686,0.00380119,0.0064205965,0.013431604,0.0009472372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020986478,0.00008683432,0.012687506,0.0000884775,0.000050881426,0.0029009758,0.024369929,0.0003479863,0.0007439927,0.8044922,0.14486685,0.0091545535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029422124,0.000100837206,0.083323464,0.0011938574,0.00015054003,0.0006800047,0.06603437,0.0012045074,0.0015282533,0.16074668,0.6844658,0.00027744373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83268976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9401736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16731024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036612876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044888876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33659106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013724371","doi":"","title":"Canada's Residential Schools and the Right to Integrity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012403787905154562,"score_gpt":0.26058822500860657,"score_spread":0.248184437103452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013724371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06327936,0.004889288,0.002352412,0.14691368,0.00034053935,0.000078326586,0.0004456439,0.00009129994,0.7816095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8387103,0.002414214,0.0017600476,0.024936987,0.000099725796,0.000055126944,0.00012961117,0.000047746715,0.13184622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925087,0.00088703097,0.00017903648,0.0006399216,0.0025947369,0.0031905263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99396163,0.0012569638,0.0004191504,0.0005014698,0.0021584532,0.0017024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029861093,0.00024326115,0.00040075564,0.000944265,0.0324109,0.010207729,0.002183298,0.0059448043,0.011049821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007951441,0.0004052862,0.0004273486,0.0014514419,0.026680391,0.0031049869,0.0064988737,0.008446203,0.00044831476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009931409,0.000013457228,0.0019128677,0.000029824632,0.0000061831533,0.00022460072,0.0073638237,0.00018777336,0.000090890586,0.9614006,0.019950958,0.008809007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000513966,0.000037437745,0.018953003,0.00068706274,0.00004819091,0.00040583,0.020851232,0.00088046695,0.0006625944,0.16287331,0.7944006,0.00014901756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9878869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06992608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06992608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19523033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50735164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014351859","doi":"10.7202/1068483ar","title":"Moss v. Computers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Trumpeter","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Moss; Computer science; Botany; Biology","score_opus":0.037996160484163884,"score_gpt":0.2640871392305591,"score_spread":0.22609097874639522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014351859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004573944,0.0034294834,0.0007959887,0.09343094,0.0012815287,0.000049032777,0.00024148937,0.0001984171,0.8959992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08597419,0.0019512012,0.00047025786,0.14372662,0.0007378083,0.00012930915,0.00009741739,0.00012664565,0.76678646],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985783,0.00025112176,0.0000428348,0.00030925643,0.0004079807,0.00041051407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833447,0.0008885193,0.00009847545,0.00013718159,0.0003286879,0.00021276399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010213086,0.0006238409,0.00036720707,0.00094464293,0.008813012,0.00618988,0.0010840683,0.0103438385,0.06646438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006600603,0.00051877944,0.00052474614,0.00085845107,0.003165842,0.0046948395,0.0025782788,0.009058101,0.012625751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060292965,0.00002230393,0.000696769,0.0000720723,0.0000064897804,0.00022775072,0.0009475533,0.00014221882,0.00021584195,0.4100581,0.56113493,0.026415786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037242873,0.000025122019,0.0011162815,0.00018861507,0.000015570022,0.0001244147,0.00064167235,0.00017955483,0.000467188,0.03657909,0.9606014,0.00002388928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056042336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.089953505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06646438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038637195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007033292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22234547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023035481","doi":"10.12987/9780300227529","title":"The Soul of the First Amendment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Yale University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Amendment; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.023331041981705235,"score_gpt":0.20061066579902373,"score_spread":0.1772796238173185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023035481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006633638,0.0141333705,0.0014497498,0.011642425,0.0012046703,0.000013003759,0.000029865194,0.00003664468,0.970827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10620909,0.022684984,0.002094984,0.018223934,0.0027280324,0.00017369434,0.00011113386,0.0001502695,0.84762394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773383,0.0009342876,0.000043428132,0.00022943025,0.0007864318,0.00027259838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853635,0.0008594205,0.000070306254,0.00023861206,0.00020086674,0.00009444813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019016376,0.00046591155,0.00032296136,0.0011700841,0.0036826844,0.0080913,0.00066210085,0.0025588241,0.010624556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039972626,0.0002469113,0.00032830087,0.00093589077,0.01875186,0.00602674,0.002293803,0.0060254205,0.0044140425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026986763,0.0000040732634,0.000021787653,0.000019176994,7.248338e-7,0.000017129498,0.0006040052,0.000037828944,0.000027127846,0.952205,0.038340367,0.008720033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041727185,0.000007338548,0.00010079353,0.00022663084,0.0000016060345,0.00005326186,0.00043819976,0.000076199925,0.00010025303,0.23612405,0.7628618,0.0000056818985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006710042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078073847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010624556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055945576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066728205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04059148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032934504","doi":"10.21991/cf29398","title":"Universities, the Charter, Doug Ford, and Campus Free Speech","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Free speech; Government (linguistics); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.019671048416240216,"score_gpt":0.2430327299145546,"score_spread":0.2233616814983144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032934504","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006443878,0.021908814,0.0006383797,0.52097404,0.010374651,0.00004839617,0.0007331613,0.00018882008,0.4386899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11082204,0.009415097,0.00057741214,0.06358073,0.002609893,0.00007017291,0.00043200026,0.00023279808,0.8122598],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930034,0.0009844702,0.00016094562,0.0006312921,0.003111388,0.002108434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99164176,0.0018016611,0.0004350438,0.00041383982,0.00227741,0.0034303505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039476804,0.00043666808,0.00034671224,0.0012012533,0.023850754,0.015588959,0.0013192615,0.0069305045,0.047914993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012823628,0.00048073396,0.00026665095,0.0024059422,0.010209175,0.008444972,0.0040219603,0.0069581033,0.0086533725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001487381,0.000004967168,0.00021375078,0.000025883452,7.477834e-7,0.000040588522,0.0019480225,0.000022500117,0.000024061233,0.070761055,0.9181008,0.008842653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038428434,0.000002528974,0.0006337225,0.00005020511,0.0000010877085,0.000013353314,0.0026487429,0.000017350076,0.0000330967,0.0017431442,0.99484104,0.000011878212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8489573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92045045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94053805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059461974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058196273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43142885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033284431","doi":"10.21991/cf29394","title":"Introduction: Symbolic Politics, Constitutional Consequences*","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Diversity (politics); De facto; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.028190580018755452,"score_gpt":0.26772541568922875,"score_spread":0.2395348356704733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033284431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032395325,0.023866657,0.0034514714,0.16082835,0.013895005,0.000032479897,0.00033077248,0.000082800994,0.79427284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3223016,0.023962058,0.002628633,0.07845886,0.034607556,0.00025552834,0.0006958499,0.0003350088,0.5367549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987382,0.00056101836,0.000036723442,0.00019425829,0.00031413577,0.00015578578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981608,0.0010798599,0.00012887872,0.00022208397,0.00027755732,0.0001307705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011547963,0.0005421604,0.00028682235,0.0010587525,0.003986931,0.008503022,0.0010950727,0.0044867764,0.04007718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003921298,0.00018897018,0.00034995802,0.0015714294,0.011154334,0.006671854,0.003063328,0.005446859,0.005276894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057016377,0.000007804393,0.000094605835,0.000039921983,0.0000011385866,0.00002954003,0.0011700938,0.000038893533,0.000026243548,0.85308844,0.13801414,0.0074834744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047799194,0.0000085894,0.0004693222,0.00020499913,0.0000019282547,0.00008704656,0.0014114749,0.00013789542,0.00006761141,0.1980978,0.7995022,0.0000063250905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004895184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045062318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04007718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003971298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018570262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13407153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033467396","doi":"10.21991/cf29397","title":"The Politics of Campus Free Speech in Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Executive order; Order (exchange); Liberal arts education; Political science; Higher education; Public administration; Directive; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.013957357414486496,"score_gpt":0.22911641902059113,"score_spread":0.21515906160610462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033467396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11276934,0.028842235,0.0006923925,0.2861846,0.0027062828,0.00011741685,0.0012292553,0.00013953239,0.5673189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77709395,0.010782353,0.0005331531,0.057523556,0.00047372383,0.000082570106,0.00047659726,0.00016058436,0.15287353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98928773,0.0006815305,0.00014743111,0.0005815397,0.0033241482,0.005977601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866383,0.0017348875,0.00039892743,0.0002247938,0.0037968177,0.0072062346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034900396,0.00044688222,0.0006024859,0.0028539656,0.053874895,0.021092765,0.0022094375,0.005974343,0.01668195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010830774,0.00056188105,0.00048236482,0.0055003385,0.017487383,0.0037800039,0.007025354,0.008088349,0.0011971388],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019966728,0.00007853969,0.010644208,0.00016301419,0.000044626253,0.00083105295,0.02851811,0.0005629496,0.00033549068,0.50752395,0.39390385,0.05719452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064844215,0.000029112685,0.0318194,0.00056927325,0.00004599367,0.00011032424,0.056385666,0.0005605464,0.00028637855,0.017961558,0.89191777,0.00024902791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2811549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2811549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34979025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8337584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033585614","doi":"10.21991/cf29395","title":"Compelling Freedom on Campus: A Free Speech Paradox","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Entitlement (fair division); Coercion (linguistics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03216580779953247,"score_gpt":0.26786256532552793,"score_spread":0.23569675752599545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033585614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069769435,0.0028393792,0.007767022,0.17962547,0.0008792972,0.000059261944,0.00035825762,0.000165579,0.7385363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90611225,0.0012340217,0.0008523365,0.037729207,0.0017858117,0.00010606837,0.00012206288,0.0001493986,0.051908743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99298495,0.0027168838,0.00021701443,0.00090594444,0.0019170763,0.0012581944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875238,0.009481271,0.0004810055,0.0007361441,0.0007408928,0.0010368616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076741935,0.00044277104,0.0006939592,0.0013345362,0.015778072,0.014181103,0.002515393,0.013793781,0.02408562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019440982,0.0004437082,0.0006066623,0.0015687541,0.019617738,0.012024451,0.0082664285,0.015631171,0.0031377666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014157222,0.000023235685,0.00011998057,0.000013404811,0.0000034311486,0.00013051071,0.0023895213,0.00017157749,0.00007526245,0.9789488,0.0144222835,0.0036879007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006054538,0.00001427123,0.0004301308,0.00009499017,0.000011261406,0.00008076071,0.0030032038,0.0008696076,0.0002800204,0.8572062,0.13790454,0.000044516837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026393881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027569676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026393881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010105015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007112106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08057439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033795301","doi":"10.21991/cf29399","title":"Academic Freedom, Canadian Labour Law and the Scope of Intra-Mural Expression","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mural; Collective bargaining; Scope (computer science); Academic freedom; Law; Freedom of association; Labour law; Censorship; Unit (ring theory); Sociology; Political science; Human rights; Higher education; History; Psychology; Computer science; Art history","score_opus":0.020545777426242893,"score_gpt":0.2553524037316265,"score_spread":0.2348066263053836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033795301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020780105,0.00712021,0.0014038916,0.05839207,0.0003741393,0.000052359654,0.00012329358,0.000023540777,0.9117304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84345496,0.0049163294,0.0009318066,0.016973464,0.0002870444,0.00008724193,0.000077501834,0.00004922691,0.13322245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98814183,0.0020060092,0.00029584137,0.0010140513,0.0037322086,0.0048100897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909339,0.0036049178,0.0005653104,0.00053216243,0.0026189957,0.001744609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071379347,0.00045998898,0.0004968245,0.0030852626,0.044800133,0.017376479,0.0025366142,0.007049979,0.016912868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013210931,0.00044771066,0.0004893547,0.0041389945,0.05859918,0.0057013533,0.008616366,0.0072081154,0.0009319054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067599626,0.000007343218,0.00067443476,0.000020276511,0.0000017520325,0.000080724465,0.0061116503,0.000076475924,0.000029872866,0.97556907,0.011930279,0.005491407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028808065,0.000019212648,0.00770339,0.00071715313,0.000016225134,0.00019656404,0.020588629,0.0007386506,0.00021681453,0.3586597,0.610991,0.0001238889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9603716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96664554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85454696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14545302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1093089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99115336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044246106","doi":"","title":"‘The Highest Form of Patriotism:’ Toward an Understanding of First Amendment Precedents and NFL Protests","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Emerging Sport Studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patriotism; Law; First amendment; Political science; Amendment; Politics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.11035824080094257,"score_gpt":0.372857554571425,"score_spread":0.2624993137704824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044246106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19506322,0.0005555498,0.011454076,0.040608767,0.00015037565,0.0000513429,0.000063402316,0.00001899742,0.75203437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99423075,0.000053186526,0.000586487,0.0012219534,0.000042728265,0.000022472685,0.000007724875,0.0000058082587,0.0038288205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946414,0.002394218,0.00018008462,0.0007239506,0.0005523522,0.0015079854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989813,0.006088086,0.001414486,0.001215657,0.0007789759,0.00068966986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057292064,0.00016418952,0.0003299891,0.0014604917,0.0072961473,0.0075695966,0.0015805666,0.006869348,0.0068986584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020259101,0.00032694935,0.00040237955,0.0011806913,0.0352868,0.007769353,0.0036467265,0.007818156,0.00040563082],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044238336,0.00001184505,0.0008379321,0.0000070169826,0.0000013741881,0.0000528942,0.0063380585,0.000047883415,0.000030801817,0.9900051,0.0007603995,0.0019022529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016916538,0.000022389195,0.0066175116,0.00019978677,0.0000069008147,0.00023067468,0.020294921,0.0006316642,0.00027676526,0.93950635,0.03215919,0.000036853042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010255173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017813155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010255173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029703164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034266831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030299366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082844825","doi":"","title":"From Seriatim to Dissent: an Historical Overview of Opinion-Delivery Practices in the United States and Canada Supreme Courts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Political science; Supreme court; Law; Dissenting opinion; Majority opinion; Politics","score_opus":0.04187982788270542,"score_gpt":0.2667447978361378,"score_spread":0.2248649699534324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082844825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08063065,0.19721943,0.003383215,0.079152435,0.0017034773,0.00014194554,0.00051767164,0.00013326362,0.6371179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8330159,0.10913687,0.0020894643,0.012633663,0.0006590533,0.00006394443,0.00017515087,0.00012260547,0.042103272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99142426,0.0017327224,0.00032582125,0.00092644105,0.003784029,0.0018068058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898914,0.003128011,0.00044192132,0.00028396866,0.0050205044,0.0012341661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005735283,0.0004202516,0.00048214718,0.006978766,0.022315454,0.015332155,0.0025408152,0.0038975894,0.0036642898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010717852,0.00055708754,0.00033684008,0.0128476815,0.027314289,0.0038929398,0.0031217677,0.006248086,0.0004161159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003800378,0.00007456577,0.00396725,0.00034725995,0.000019836541,0.00058377313,0.09228671,0.00051713665,0.000260498,0.7609842,0.03989466,0.10102621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012468011,0.000042683492,0.019976765,0.0017282375,0.000025468335,0.00029315674,0.038917977,0.00060447847,0.0005804189,0.023605632,0.9140817,0.00013088943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96730685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97381276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17555192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17555192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13520642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9562429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30897024","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1429","title":"Racial and Ethnic Profiling: Statutory Discretion, Constitutional Remedies, and Democratic Accountability","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Statutory law; Legislature; Racial profiling; Statute; Democracy; Law; Political science; Accountability; Legislative history; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03839599351974181,"score_gpt":0.31375907818015114,"score_spread":0.2753630846604093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30897024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2064729,0.0038368993,0.047925483,0.2743557,0.0009098967,0.00026974585,0.0001849181,0.00023525477,0.4658092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821295,0.0002939701,0.00209757,0.00919214,0.00022180591,0.00010061123,0.000019704199,0.000020135318,0.00592454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9583676,0.012690726,0.0017455813,0.0039635566,0.0138381375,0.00939443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9613393,0.022366315,0.0043168524,0.00468825,0.0041412977,0.0031480088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03355615,0.00040466274,0.00079165713,0.0019797496,0.014945372,0.012838565,0.0024476966,0.010781689,0.002924277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063615575,0.00062602264,0.00074806146,0.001421487,0.050173126,0.006935744,0.007879029,0.01382182,0.00027278328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014979161,0.000016596523,0.00086769863,0.000012866219,0.00000721135,0.000058925758,0.0018008908,0.0003888663,0.00022139908,0.99085337,0.001240423,0.0045166854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007466125,0.000040059786,0.00370695,0.00017727743,0.00004503811,0.000059830243,0.0021956584,0.0018972966,0.0012516489,0.9574772,0.03298361,0.000090797286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11794952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15492313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11794952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018541206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043661516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23452592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097669810","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3314993","title":"The Fraud Test and 'Manifest Injustice' under the New Act","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Test (biology); Psychology; Criminology; Law; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.010126175310304089,"score_gpt":0.2713020794227313,"score_spread":0.26117590411242725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097669810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45763656,0.0010484003,0.00796761,0.14374657,0.00072634907,0.00009655843,0.00027224663,0.00005718433,0.3884486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990943,0.00010293872,0.00028963614,0.0035884746,0.00016375555,0.000031482952,0.000020095491,0.0000089409505,0.004851709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883023,0.004928645,0.0005630188,0.0010088596,0.0032161756,0.0019809587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541856,0.029808907,0.005929997,0.0051516434,0.003085324,0.0018386013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014205809,0.0002540292,0.00065400905,0.0014254921,0.0040947204,0.0073802276,0.0016258485,0.01260295,0.00753131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06937316,0.00030321843,0.00059872726,0.0010397378,0.031714994,0.008970257,0.0041940687,0.012456754,0.0005652323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088999106,0.00011099518,0.006055484,0.000019409747,0.000014508876,0.00031730023,0.0037637597,0.00016571737,0.00016678392,0.9787654,0.004394791,0.006136966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082668426,0.00010941795,0.020585356,0.00015930714,0.000055765435,0.00063032616,0.005029742,0.0022418287,0.0008801498,0.9498352,0.02029556,0.000094788404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008002173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056051337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014205809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029139232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047450894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075128436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121156435","doi":"","title":"Using the Charter to Stop Racial Profiling: The Development of an Equality-Based Conception of Arbitrary Detention","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racial profiling; Charter; Offensive; Criminology; Political science; Rationality; Profiling (computer programming); Reasonable suspicion; Law; Sociology; Race (biology); Gender studies; Engineering; Operations research; Computer science","score_opus":0.1401032799816692,"score_gpt":0.3488697523661616,"score_spread":0.2087664723844924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121156435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04231445,0.0074868975,0.357681,0.13113487,0.00326534,0.00029898706,0.0001161579,0.00028210718,0.45742014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8713061,0.0029468185,0.07988134,0.010671383,0.001053106,0.00032334743,0.00006448578,0.00015144645,0.033601917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9737409,0.015516055,0.0009866983,0.0020883395,0.0055090934,0.002158984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846001,0.007642287,0.0019443249,0.0016840246,0.00337094,0.00075829617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02735065,0.00058023183,0.00066104694,0.0030435885,0.008971521,0.014089934,0.0030252913,0.006191144,0.001796782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027421638,0.0005077241,0.00076367386,0.0013916171,0.06696729,0.01388984,0.0065018325,0.010671725,0.00048011987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002913915,0.0000051994425,0.00016647446,0.000005959809,7.5795697e-7,0.000018187617,0.0027063263,0.00029012348,0.000023307375,0.99234927,0.0009882668,0.0034431915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001642073,0.000060184782,0.00087537826,0.00035089123,0.000015808087,0.00010858085,0.0043614516,0.003489251,0.00064299366,0.80975217,0.1802486,0.00007833139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05077955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039689396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9492204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018151488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029479586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14464581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121409700","doi":"","title":"Sunshine's chill: Overbroad American Open Meetings Laws and the Limits of Disclosure","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Transparency (behavior); Discretion; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public access; Freedom of information; Law; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.021720922949092426,"score_gpt":0.30456163087323856,"score_spread":0.2828407079241461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121409700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03315448,0.0058904476,0.00825767,0.43913892,0.0046295715,0.00014263089,0.0003239474,0.00033965815,0.5081226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42076984,0.0027225928,0.0069464995,0.46140718,0.0038831113,0.00056885125,0.00018108716,0.00022893789,0.1032918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766099,0.0071633216,0.001757128,0.0035328893,0.007867898,0.0030688918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9346433,0.04851447,0.0024941459,0.0045767347,0.007394997,0.0023763631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02807817,0.00043369332,0.0006521204,0.0011907405,0.013877209,0.014367539,0.0025432366,0.018025542,0.010008004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0674209,0.00082913047,0.0010870493,0.0012439217,0.013255046,0.010875499,0.0066715693,0.0284168,0.0021717637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003163351,0.00004024238,0.0010691044,0.000037731603,0.00000849919,0.00012885644,0.004414375,0.000088449735,0.00031531334,0.8603213,0.11957694,0.013967707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000736809,0.00008406393,0.004653138,0.0008211108,0.000062921725,0.00024027542,0.00498361,0.00088740495,0.0009995973,0.21147113,0.7755746,0.00014850519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052582134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06608185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052582134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005270568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013535065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14849335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122095553","doi":"","title":"The Legislature, The Executive and The Courts:The Delicate Balance of Power or Who is RunningThis Country Anyway?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Balance (ability); Executive power; Power (physics); Law; Separation of powers; Political science; Legislation; Law and economics; Economics; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.012996224039834196,"score_gpt":0.26635117729895375,"score_spread":0.25335495325911955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122095553","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021832343,0.020834703,0.0015840967,0.7469436,0.0012622265,0.000008077243,0.00010509449,0.000024465871,0.20740543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7220047,0.018291201,0.0010430607,0.15210418,0.002894864,0.00004745265,0.000077581324,0.000092738264,0.103444174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601895,0.0014956034,0.000070013346,0.00045674684,0.0005746004,0.0013841492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961598,0.0014679685,0.00041696132,0.00018182144,0.000491736,0.0012816774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059447736,0.00035595064,0.00084963336,0.001183246,0.012568097,0.028772898,0.0017115794,0.010674862,0.02687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008346467,0.00052436866,0.0003323526,0.0023826053,0.031285938,0.026203882,0.004132928,0.011897755,0.0023913828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019792524,0.00002869118,0.0010749404,0.000028459433,0.000012569178,0.00005599371,0.0040782825,0.000050221646,0.000071341245,0.94170284,0.040499907,0.012376819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034148023,0.000023520071,0.0042872224,0.00064779876,0.00003839175,0.00007544044,0.0345033,0.00020593696,0.00025031558,0.59687304,0.36300552,0.00005530922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08154324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20938341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99110466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0088953525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018157667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16213721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122291537","doi":"","title":"The Rule of Law Through the Looking Glass","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Sociology; Citizenship; Politics; Adventure; Law and literature; Public law; Democracy; Political science; History","score_opus":0.01098454778374097,"score_gpt":0.27513181154594085,"score_spread":0.2641472637621999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122291537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10138821,0.009342299,0.01459156,0.04398945,0.0003736287,0.000035450015,0.0000790553,0.00010383449,0.8300965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9723788,0.002427937,0.0019717324,0.00220961,0.000085153246,0.000035331595,0.000026380982,0.000071898845,0.020793052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954997,0.0024579354,0.00011843175,0.00056170387,0.00083700323,0.00052529195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957411,0.002936401,0.00043800488,0.0003876234,0.00027794007,0.00021885138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038369098,0.00033082132,0.0003244974,0.0016506033,0.008127879,0.009742308,0.000921291,0.0023854566,0.0047122734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062441346,0.00036295096,0.0003254225,0.00085379224,0.06792991,0.010649049,0.0045357463,0.0048460695,0.0006108172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033223164,0.0000040343207,0.00021172495,0.000016777814,0.0000012748529,0.000057630226,0.03749025,0.00004408136,0.00007120612,0.9580956,0.0012814977,0.0027225604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010036359,0.00002178743,0.00089442043,0.0004362405,0.000009571866,0.00029022465,0.04792613,0.00018426297,0.00046912977,0.39784375,0.55188775,0.000026713618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024579775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023579875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024579775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009127919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046511283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06622797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122428691","doi":"","title":"Ministerial Misfeasance: R. v. Morris and a UniqueEarly Privacy Breach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer security; Law; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0197245418296705,"score_gpt":0.28760336063646547,"score_spread":0.267878818806795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122428691","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.124396436,0.0033442245,0.0033762944,0.44279477,0.0010372554,0.000048671198,0.000091922164,0.00020187016,0.4247086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86444527,0.00095611875,0.0012437957,0.07694703,0.00035855174,0.000034868233,0.000015546253,0.00007670766,0.055922106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487346,0.0016714673,0.00017741369,0.00066233263,0.0010333321,0.0015819725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959025,0.001961912,0.00036108238,0.0006738663,0.0004456757,0.0006550596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006518953,0.00030335176,0.000450056,0.00047184658,0.009797911,0.0068656113,0.0017032744,0.014021698,0.004756597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01836393,0.0005398302,0.00051563786,0.0004590857,0.009790091,0.003602141,0.0056287865,0.015318901,0.00078623515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006783298,0.000044508615,0.0032859596,0.000038586797,0.00002412847,0.0023209138,0.01168963,0.00023680646,0.0006669684,0.8934218,0.07729218,0.010910652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081743,0.00010524816,0.0073216045,0.00047791467,0.00015583787,0.0046334043,0.014650554,0.0014331609,0.0031847216,0.3336127,0.63414663,0.00019651848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04655831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09041911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9534417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005607175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009816494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092574656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123858016","doi":"","title":"Don’t Be So Hateful — The Insufficiency of Anti-Discrimination and Hate Crime Laws in Improving Trans Wellbeing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hate crime; Harassment; Emancipation; Law; Identity (music); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.025497917614821484,"score_gpt":0.25348227474928625,"score_spread":0.22798435713446477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123858016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23800722,0.00744198,0.01687637,0.30028766,0.0014927563,0.000054815813,0.00008201751,0.00024662446,0.4355104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96263516,0.0020582052,0.0038229863,0.017135836,0.000180658,0.000052764244,0.00002250555,0.00006867986,0.014023351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973392,0.0014652226,0.000102984806,0.00018512232,0.00047784238,0.00042971846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937662,0.0019606766,0.0008727865,0.0010883712,0.00069000636,0.0016219397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005461398,0.00023870872,0.00023475634,0.00063192484,0.0047500506,0.005073982,0.000648951,0.0021535235,0.0047041513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008501944,0.00018131814,0.00031076098,0.000314933,0.015802447,0.005223353,0.0072743385,0.0039731245,0.0008365186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006317182,0.00023474605,0.014433446,0.0001688194,0.000027679198,0.00027413724,0.020272564,0.00021012117,0.0025385125,0.7617057,0.026092192,0.1739789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003433609,0.0005631618,0.042271502,0.0013876782,0.00008672806,0.0020024935,0.06741232,0.00088287523,0.009194344,0.4384724,0.43759146,0.00010071719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026136432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041199457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005461398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010739363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024743336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02888298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124110914","doi":"","title":"Customs Censorship and the Charter: The Little Sisters Case","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Charter; Law; Censorship; Politics; Political science; Legislation; Disadvantaged; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.01634789613095618,"score_gpt":0.24433255981187418,"score_spread":0.227984663680918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124110914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2941039,0.0038310788,0.0011189098,0.10785666,0.0006642795,0.00012240613,0.0000994208,0.00003917674,0.5921642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90392035,0.001237025,0.00030601132,0.021679565,0.00035101254,0.00011105183,0.000029878762,0.000037095677,0.072327994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888986,0.003186064,0.00026918552,0.000958923,0.0025990794,0.004088329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892291,0.0058394545,0.0008278337,0.0007260093,0.0012081251,0.002169544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01056843,0.00043381384,0.0008963533,0.0017536092,0.033669032,0.014742986,0.0032559745,0.020627398,0.014594005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021667529,0.0010747085,0.00092249084,0.0025661953,0.027840035,0.00800351,0.008182014,0.01846458,0.0008654609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046473382,0.000082895494,0.003111169,0.000030047337,0.000010668407,0.0027294678,0.013615757,0.0001514839,0.0001072996,0.96313196,0.012813052,0.0041697123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043109906,0.00026737916,0.011670665,0.001509007,0.00019495557,0.0034781564,0.0852686,0.00270266,0.0014990775,0.37632632,0.51624113,0.00041090904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35147938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42102316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6485206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018486908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023423806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6988671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124261222","doi":"","title":"Hierarchies of Harm in Canadian Criminal Law: The Marijuana Trilogy and the Forcible “Correction” of Children","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Law; Supreme court; Criminal law; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Criminology; Criminal Conviction; Possession (linguistics); Sociology; Conviction","score_opus":0.012247982616279495,"score_gpt":0.2490488176209205,"score_spread":0.236800835004641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124261222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14417191,0.011863707,0.0026291546,0.15321119,0.0006740296,0.00011367418,0.0002615592,0.000052129468,0.6870226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9625511,0.0035056737,0.0012786526,0.009615449,0.00013587717,0.00005042913,0.000070865295,0.000032478674,0.02275947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918725,0.0011477727,0.0001708731,0.0004787182,0.0029994412,0.003330744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933294,0.001778738,0.0005745794,0.00018995671,0.002591348,0.001536064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035316094,0.0005777081,0.0004968489,0.0059414804,0.04817265,0.011508936,0.0028731837,0.005114367,0.0047409995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012115522,0.0006484987,0.0005297324,0.0061276495,0.043942764,0.004778369,0.0071563725,0.007352655,0.00020288887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009891766,0.000013993745,0.0051803533,0.000031114534,0.0000068179775,0.00022324662,0.039668363,0.000257734,0.00005290646,0.92732245,0.017237816,0.009995173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006448625,0.000039576735,0.06418941,0.00085239485,0.000103582075,0.0005630905,0.11898456,0.002291322,0.00035308482,0.30321944,0.5090038,0.0003351837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99713093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21314093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21314093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19456476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.912645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124655312","doi":"","title":"'Dignitizing' Free Speech in Israel: The Impact of the Constitutional Revolution on Free Speech Protection","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Free speech; Law; Political science; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Human rights; Constitution","score_opus":0.02270652773365419,"score_gpt":0.2869620760378275,"score_spread":0.2642555483041733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124655312","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3303913,0.02026068,0.0121256495,0.07922533,0.0007684233,0.00006126043,0.00019298476,0.000051704512,0.5569226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861697,0.002162263,0.0007887471,0.004460206,0.0004218599,0.000025012649,0.000049194783,0.000013886325,0.005909232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611294,0.0016889661,0.00012628785,0.00034928485,0.001073889,0.0006485496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905522,0.007554831,0.0005840516,0.0004313382,0.00061350554,0.00026406505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010146562,0.00022320238,0.00034967187,0.0014206188,0.0027435983,0.0070237215,0.0008345406,0.0025212972,0.0039337794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012813509,0.00014569313,0.00030478876,0.0010196524,0.024029747,0.0049936385,0.003199973,0.0037547466,0.0002773704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027225207,0.000019753506,0.0006286363,0.000044307762,0.000006190055,0.00009399143,0.0047056824,0.0004299027,0.00026901904,0.9698533,0.0015617842,0.022360183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006848954,0.00014007969,0.010195856,0.0007397181,0.00003052841,0.00021604252,0.010435733,0.001739618,0.0023065158,0.7675589,0.20649347,0.000075049655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0099251205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009570567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010146562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076306504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004971561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05536449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131615048","doi":"","title":"A Response to Fake News as a Response to Citizens United","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Argument (complex analysis); Incitement; Politics; Absolute (philosophy); Intervention (counseling); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Linguistics; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.010844965270522824,"score_gpt":0.28362319784018025,"score_spread":0.27277823256965744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131615048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14591938,0.0014989201,0.014562843,0.1307267,0.0035501013,0.00011704262,0.00012573448,0.00028199027,0.7032172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9130522,0.00032726603,0.0016308508,0.027472734,0.0009707138,0.00006757639,0.000031609714,0.000087275715,0.056359816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99344,0.0033234821,0.0002430016,0.00056328403,0.0012942504,0.0011359394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98679787,0.008867295,0.0019407031,0.0010239913,0.0009910318,0.00037899913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038799052,0.00033504752,0.0003006926,0.0007665827,0.004129608,0.005434585,0.0008225764,0.013294882,0.011108658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023354376,0.00024907978,0.00043066978,0.00044926122,0.005926769,0.005009928,0.002346828,0.007049639,0.0019131227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022658204,0.000112793976,0.004616936,0.00013022995,0.000033413075,0.0017447679,0.035219073,0.00070646056,0.0030542098,0.8266269,0.09220756,0.035321042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013601188,0.00047170892,0.010574988,0.0005898634,0.00012359387,0.0023154821,0.04356593,0.0073834322,0.0070372084,0.19551925,0.73204195,0.00024049559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023110788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002421825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013294882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020851525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010410061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037162185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134211377","doi":"","title":"Racial Justice and Peace","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Desegregation; Doctrine; Legal doctrine; Sociology","score_opus":0.011009413929172623,"score_gpt":0.2768292501082882,"score_spread":0.26581983617911553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134211377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014059866,0.031111713,0.0038208493,0.16960266,0.002442366,0.00003314986,0.000074746196,0.000054483924,0.7788002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8533699,0.012255094,0.0024309522,0.053937856,0.0033077963,0.00009007949,0.00008716195,0.00009394428,0.07442725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99391466,0.003051452,0.00015582284,0.0008190729,0.0008255536,0.0012334198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980095,0.0007849247,0.00024377945,0.00029614064,0.00022826497,0.00043741963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050755874,0.0005117694,0.0005237632,0.0015417484,0.022971751,0.0118997,0.000934297,0.0068614637,0.013732753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060409303,0.00020491701,0.00043372926,0.001145174,0.04239599,0.009067046,0.011681234,0.008348733,0.0016581062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042305505,0.000007833726,0.00013757164,0.000018141236,0.0000026889018,0.000029753284,0.0036031927,0.000031024945,0.000028583236,0.97785497,0.00946304,0.008819064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008730307,0.000018807694,0.0005275048,0.00027949095,0.000005688211,0.00009339044,0.005519919,0.000057163994,0.00012978635,0.60754627,0.38580275,0.000010520271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070920014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011536341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022971751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062589757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077067283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045940638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134258955","doi":"","title":"Compelling Freedom on Campus: A Free Speech Paradox","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Charter; Autonomy; Ideology; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Academic freedom; Democracy; Coercion (linguistics); Corporate governance; Statement (logic); Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.018253414537804012,"score_gpt":0.25828077921168174,"score_spread":0.24002736467387772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134258955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12849323,0.0017113208,0.012011326,0.19423683,0.00053008884,0.000040245835,0.00033290355,0.000112674556,0.6625313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561368,0.00067528925,0.00088956486,0.017078694,0.0005074288,0.000041077925,0.000085621105,0.00006765381,0.02451791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956126,0.0015691866,0.000111116045,0.0005102659,0.0013515629,0.0008452034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98851854,0.007879307,0.0005649434,0.00090869085,0.00092549424,0.0012029832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062251,0.00022865771,0.00048347012,0.0010966063,0.011686983,0.011266493,0.001288477,0.006063944,0.010866203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016010793,0.00028034727,0.00041365786,0.0015080875,0.024972323,0.0085053295,0.0053043426,0.007414982,0.0013365893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000130555145,0.000011368364,0.00020030544,0.0000090141875,0.0000021642345,0.000065490705,0.0024929035,0.00018061708,0.00005549845,0.98452073,0.009390621,0.0030582016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042162792,0.0000076123424,0.0006834999,0.00005720986,0.000005250565,0.000052443276,0.0043763043,0.00081184343,0.00016470133,0.9061465,0.087618604,0.000033862605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07267232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084130675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07267232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011913938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009416862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14449859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157406129","doi":"","title":"The Fourth Amendment Limits of Facial Recognition at the Border","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Law; First amendment; Political science","score_opus":0.03107473343573984,"score_gpt":0.29027726317913116,"score_spread":0.2592025297433913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157406129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035924006,0.0018521586,0.013992545,0.026455915,0.0011086334,0.00020608056,0.00031610442,0.00024068089,0.91990376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8575712,0.0018923344,0.013019854,0.046452172,0.0015046054,0.0013814332,0.00027362228,0.000119847995,0.07778489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9733242,0.0055673053,0.0022304833,0.0044715228,0.009740808,0.0046657417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97523105,0.014819472,0.0015183274,0.0039451355,0.0038701436,0.00061583903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014809883,0.000941085,0.0013053667,0.0020282518,0.008503584,0.016106054,0.0052956794,0.022853162,0.0076535004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036811102,0.0014561422,0.0026886594,0.0009632509,0.01639687,0.0072897575,0.0068333107,0.016652191,0.0029990445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003806324,0.000048814734,0.0005189856,0.00003012682,0.000009227449,0.000274144,0.0009992906,0.00042452678,0.00058362,0.98459274,0.0077964715,0.004683892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023251516,0.00043927698,0.0040239515,0.0018450464,0.00025493602,0.0014164754,0.003615207,0.0055764383,0.005972748,0.5899551,0.3862087,0.0004596141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021656338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018496163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022853162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007014259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010806953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.078323066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159757507","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v20i2.5133","title":"Ronin: A Police Officer's Fall into the Federal Correctional System","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Political science; Law; Criminology; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.031027629140168732,"score_gpt":0.27671225062042515,"score_spread":0.2456846214802564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159757507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5934619,0.0019315415,0.00060138886,0.32030988,0.0063361386,0.00016338707,0.000195611,0.00022423833,0.07677583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.840952,0.0016571282,0.0004289854,0.06511151,0.00070569676,0.00007364259,0.00008024878,0.00010029308,0.090890475],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983254,0.00039574172,0.000049098227,0.00010353632,0.00014625712,0.0009798977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982515,0.000148132,0.00023290214,0.000039118677,0.0002946389,0.0010336867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009070388,0.0005471339,0.00036860828,0.0005784971,0.04575424,0.0036013334,0.00157841,0.0063077467,0.010769287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035279803,0.00047807753,0.00037429627,0.0004973135,0.0023537534,0.0023793264,0.003960876,0.01255911,0.0010343589],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027403174,0.00077821646,0.042877,0.00024910894,0.000051982894,0.0790325,0.37478364,0.0003450421,0.0023392227,0.018881679,0.4279669,0.052420747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016745458,0.00030792019,0.030857608,0.0005650213,0.00003543384,0.010596429,0.7439209,0.00035523524,0.00051536696,0.0014170719,0.21133496,0.000077228295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1423218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43809682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1423218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00753591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014219846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28298676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163023040","doi":"10.29173/mlj817","title":"Social Incrimination: How North American Courts are Embracing Social Network Evidence in Criminal and Civil Trials","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Self-incrimination; Political science; Law; Criminology; Criminal trial; Sociology; Privilege (computing)","score_opus":0.14480596891845848,"score_gpt":0.34825251287941794,"score_spread":0.20344654396095946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163023040","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090411834,0.013564625,0.004178468,0.67725,0.001819084,0.000106154264,0.00006678574,0.000080148624,0.2125228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8411106,0.008257596,0.0028221793,0.13120298,0.001637803,0.00018227407,0.000052777643,0.0001036785,0.014630107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9359486,0.044139516,0.0018771946,0.0041451934,0.008842345,0.0050471374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8047788,0.16217312,0.006721485,0.0045791236,0.015503308,0.0062440983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.076046355,0.0004039811,0.0007179549,0.005387878,0.044430945,0.035132382,0.004033416,0.018550765,0.0070203464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15052809,0.0009450669,0.0005525745,0.0043483833,0.046373893,0.024232132,0.015499259,0.01865425,0.0008366645],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010517747,0.00015041513,0.016101226,0.00032679152,0.00007159523,0.0029220171,0.2652735,0.00034340433,0.00038096006,0.48981908,0.11572141,0.10878446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000733697,0.00009502499,0.013025919,0.0027386844,0.00010386976,0.00081626844,0.23446517,0.0010245068,0.00055758626,0.25732052,0.48960373,0.00017525857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12665656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.299401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87334347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018451545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0393944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40217638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164543946","doi":"","title":"The Rhetoric of the Fourth Amendment: Toward a More Persuasive Fourth Amendment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Washington and Lee law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pathos; Law; Rhetoric; Ethos; Supreme court; Persuasion; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Theology; Psychology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030643938652355575,"score_gpt":0.2938162550746398,"score_spread":0.2631723164222842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164543946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014677854,0.144913,0.026394287,0.21207191,0.029036848,0.00027451618,0.0005984625,0.00033369436,0.58490956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15557167,0.21703209,0.067952864,0.108263545,0.072623566,0.0019472555,0.0019246875,0.00078419707,0.37390018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921381,0.0040869797,0.0003009387,0.0005170121,0.002681245,0.0002757692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99018925,0.006411752,0.0007301221,0.00054025144,0.0017169648,0.0004117182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0081882505,0.0009194529,0.0006187724,0.0046394453,0.0031807127,0.009664264,0.002182242,0.006492202,0.029986076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01747978,0.0005244796,0.00058506825,0.0046883393,0.007900244,0.009282749,0.00284188,0.009272218,0.0105477525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010296893,0.000029849058,0.0001237425,0.00027306387,0.000003427854,0.00004828656,0.00076950906,0.00019113702,0.00010337653,0.75664437,0.2066778,0.03512515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008204854,0.000026305657,0.00031548488,0.0015759186,0.0000056865074,0.0000639443,0.00039500147,0.00028909443,0.00013468284,0.17855898,0.81861013,0.000016574117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037622917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032288483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029986076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007851712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007802312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100313425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165048554","doi":"10.2478/vjls-2021-0004","title":"The Rules Applicable to Conflicts of Interests for Canadian State Representatives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vietnamese Journal of Legal Sciences","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Works and Government Services Canada","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Public administration; House of Representatives; Public interest; Law; Law and economics; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.05327709081726061,"score_gpt":0.35162122146138264,"score_spread":0.298344130644122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165048554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021384737,0.001910721,0.027113847,0.042822655,0.0014234021,0.003099406,0.003174218,0.00036719002,0.8987039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6113932,0.0038321735,0.09276425,0.043107383,0.0015840003,0.0033078766,0.0019482571,0.00029248768,0.24177042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94277084,0.010542427,0.007336835,0.003692508,0.025184106,0.010473202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91971153,0.028128792,0.0027603789,0.005199904,0.04166036,0.002539144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034745563,0.00076141686,0.0011590348,0.0063123186,0.01955855,0.019318318,0.0048723924,0.013527783,0.012560293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08048659,0.0019131155,0.0018606111,0.005277603,0.011468667,0.003950856,0.0035174552,0.011213192,0.0029081742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002183618,0.00003892642,0.0024675603,0.00011673011,0.000026516038,0.00045919625,0.003674318,0.0013399405,0.00033165046,0.9072002,0.07077447,0.013548733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014981031,0.00004140004,0.011088169,0.0015721179,0.0002489228,0.0005436225,0.004690023,0.0046789413,0.0017653172,0.24548542,0.7293142,0.0004219897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90326864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92005825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096731365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044677608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17215824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32416028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174749648","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3803443","title":"The Right to Vote and Freedom of Expression in Political Process Cases Under the Charter","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Freedom of expression; Politics; Political science; Process (computing); Political process; Law and economics; Law; Human rights; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.014152423779719606,"score_gpt":0.2821137082891486,"score_spread":0.267961284509429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174749648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19830817,0.0007777179,0.024552591,0.035264596,0.0004769041,0.00023395452,0.00027662728,0.00008482035,0.74002457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98643154,0.000115687915,0.0013763558,0.001563231,0.0002723731,0.00019095572,0.000043628177,0.000026098647,0.009980082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9588154,0.022480326,0.0015345914,0.0037201934,0.004012228,0.0094372565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94240195,0.046979267,0.0029594828,0.004138886,0.0016642362,0.0018562054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02905514,0.00050533086,0.001558079,0.0019561918,0.011603048,0.017207673,0.0022180027,0.018040694,0.011560596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071459875,0.00074409985,0.0013144654,0.0022518055,0.033696458,0.012976462,0.007082764,0.01484909,0.0011638158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004336143,0.000034552188,0.000453217,0.000007631291,0.000004873227,0.000054941942,0.0009286519,0.0001902367,0.00006644502,0.99535996,0.0011474803,0.0017086428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010189102,0.00004518529,0.0015501525,0.00006101058,0.00003406711,0.0000783248,0.0015739399,0.001691227,0.0004450795,0.98266256,0.011700797,0.000055794895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010803854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013066203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039619952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008642813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15366006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185707320","doi":"10.1515/icl-2021-0003","title":"Public Employees Restrictions on Political Activity in Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICL Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Impartiality; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Public service; Public administration; Neutrality; Democracy; Balance (ability); Political science; Law; Dignity","score_opus":0.14218280279160908,"score_gpt":0.33101466611121866,"score_spread":0.18883186331960958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185707320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8765963,0.0010676632,0.00024630365,0.0059279986,0.00006296261,0.0000492909,0.00020748563,0.000023888908,0.11581809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873893,0.00042082425,0.000109093344,0.00097358687,0.000011812987,0.00001808574,0.00005242539,0.000008333714,0.011016614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927832,0.00063667493,0.00020615305,0.00035346634,0.0025994598,0.003421112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849132,0.00476445,0.0015865393,0.000535396,0.004699651,0.0035007708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029685688,0.00014593088,0.0002907468,0.0018991025,0.013694662,0.00588555,0.0011529527,0.0012223242,0.0045054234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010343492,0.0003139641,0.00022525758,0.0028977164,0.007459447,0.0010394636,0.0031908322,0.0024166992,0.00018739872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004083881,0.0002466543,0.21806197,0.00037145076,0.00007734168,0.0032528436,0.23261605,0.0013130149,0.0034994266,0.3738474,0.04623273,0.12007269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044056163,0.00007670287,0.514951,0.0005940967,0.000065645814,0.00034072954,0.17046455,0.0010334427,0.0017056442,0.003968992,0.30657315,0.00018201729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99077845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99550664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0771018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0771018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10282014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55941534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205336067","doi":"","title":"Disclosure, Not Disqualification: A Democratic Proposal to Promote the Fidelity of Elected Representatives to the People","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; Fidelity; Public administration; House of Representatives; Law; Engineering; Legislature","score_opus":0.04454734468370573,"score_gpt":0.3022225230379913,"score_spread":0.25767517835428555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205336067","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22833885,0.001844983,0.15692835,0.36031255,0.0027159997,0.0015873781,0.00014397649,0.00024254211,0.24788545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9351193,0.00038585896,0.026108611,0.02064884,0.0007608981,0.00053383,0.00003176889,0.00004233346,0.016368585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9053651,0.062338464,0.004751135,0.0059771216,0.01307128,0.008496985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89150864,0.07363632,0.012106283,0.012439117,0.0064052828,0.0039043925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09835697,0.00045869075,0.0007479663,0.001304508,0.010945537,0.014876174,0.0030517713,0.011605329,0.0029165293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15586415,0.0007527228,0.0011045276,0.00158691,0.02792209,0.011532291,0.014624793,0.010173239,0.0007373938],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008322922,0.000086738204,0.0025745938,0.00010362262,0.00001663724,0.00024986477,0.016097734,0.0007349749,0.0008231297,0.9465131,0.0062104478,0.026505928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036894486,0.0005212895,0.00643332,0.00071419176,0.00015659758,0.0012908777,0.015062479,0.0053569498,0.0073628854,0.7106288,0.25183016,0.00027341957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031501495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052090934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09835697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00515219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021987647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5201676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216061859","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-88704-9","title":"Understanding Cybersecurity Law and Digital Privacy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Future of business and finance","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Computer security; Information privacy; Internet privacy; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0322307501218966,"score_gpt":0.2312088817748908,"score_spread":0.1989781316529942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216061859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061443523,0.021267323,0.017771618,0.04600808,0.00039199056,0.000020087904,0.00010109491,0.00006853445,0.9082268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.528611,0.050945923,0.012532487,0.011977945,0.001878115,0.00014019429,0.00026793923,0.00016110064,0.39348534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929833,0.00029881595,0.00001875308,0.00006881621,0.00022802285,0.0000873324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983558,0.0012762004,0.000076288736,0.0001286535,0.00009109136,0.00007194109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013365936,0.0003971156,0.00034189393,0.0013629002,0.0018779214,0.009989968,0.0007819754,0.004177064,0.010921797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025921552,0.00028236661,0.00024905437,0.0016965993,0.015308719,0.013126583,0.0020230494,0.00392832,0.0014106788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.561355e-7,0.0000042756105,0.000026371801,0.00000605723,3.7461908e-7,0.000009954232,0.00023434538,0.00012921554,0.000015937854,0.99202263,0.0040655024,0.0034845108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010675305,0.0000016746727,0.000066819906,0.000054772674,9.1327274e-7,0.000027965274,0.00045316733,0.00043055037,0.000041346397,0.92269546,0.076224394,0.0000019577208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055948095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007348459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010921797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004887515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004192675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03653711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W324562210","doi":"","title":"Regulating Internet Pornography Aimed at Children: A Comparative Constitutional Perspective on Passing the Camel through the Needle's Eye","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Scrutiny; Pornography; Constitution; Child pornography; Constitutional court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Sociology; The Internet; Computer science","score_opus":0.026445520657002574,"score_gpt":0.30608061556982624,"score_spread":0.2796350949128237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W324562210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11572688,0.006165386,0.0058079427,0.018695742,0.0003417796,0.00016913672,0.00021508684,0.00007400989,0.85280395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96413046,0.0021621038,0.0023229537,0.0088398345,0.0003168608,0.00034829238,0.00004841511,0.00003079753,0.02180021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938619,0.002327739,0.00024902704,0.00084047683,0.0012417918,0.0014790973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950122,0.0035136081,0.00039828103,0.0003060746,0.0004985491,0.0002712304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006607178,0.00044305288,0.00054875505,0.0023222133,0.0077400086,0.00916873,0.0020819106,0.007716883,0.00858086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057010995,0.00040135818,0.00092198036,0.0014764371,0.023064781,0.004029545,0.0046752053,0.004817137,0.00040399883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001254385,0.000020629781,0.00045679839,0.000034922738,0.000004363871,0.0003059549,0.0039822515,0.00009440089,0.0003006441,0.9917692,0.0010302209,0.0019882007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018353226,0.00057989935,0.012759243,0.0021477619,0.00030806154,0.0020272988,0.036736723,0.0013168706,0.0091644395,0.40026942,0.5343015,0.00020518171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03095836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038895037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03095836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010326954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063669244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07492763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W329182439","doi":"","title":"Absentee and Write-In Ballots: Constitutional and Policy Considerations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Voting; Political science; Spoilt vote; Straight-ticket voting; Public administration; Secret ballot; Democracy; First-past-the-post voting; Group voting ticket; Turnout; Law; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.03619814241904476,"score_gpt":0.31189404000126525,"score_spread":0.27569589758222046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W329182439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06402912,0.016509071,0.0040212027,0.36375022,0.0018730519,0.0007281218,0.0019995535,0.00028692602,0.54680276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72613275,0.0074989023,0.005364104,0.12711577,0.0021983914,0.0008443131,0.0008261794,0.00021068168,0.12980886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9180238,0.017167887,0.0039971666,0.006795725,0.030395797,0.02361957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90135884,0.059555724,0.0048424206,0.0052276556,0.02016283,0.008852476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05821364,0.00063800183,0.0020651203,0.004574715,0.022422634,0.02524083,0.008517482,0.012661533,0.00818729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09345834,0.0015273985,0.00093754823,0.005664671,0.018905068,0.006223819,0.004023483,0.012250273,0.0012952924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009551836,0.00012687538,0.008182275,0.00033384585,0.00004430048,0.0004384167,0.006026954,0.0007263657,0.0006510535,0.8701776,0.08177335,0.031423427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026194283,0.00032495175,0.06638509,0.00329172,0.00031555232,0.000736559,0.01861664,0.0023855183,0.0024790615,0.10661042,0.79803926,0.0005533383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9063501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96304685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093649924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07482215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15039092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54287523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37596324","doi":"10.4337/9781781953860","title":"Secrecy, National Security and the Vindication of Constitutional Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Law; Terrorism; Political science; National security; Legislature","score_opus":0.017001823667959128,"score_gpt":0.24750708906433797,"score_spread":0.23050526539637883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W37596324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005415248,0.16775244,0.0045220465,0.14636366,0.0064988304,0.000029833656,0.00022335055,0.00009422211,0.66910034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5043754,0.15609674,0.0051518893,0.026365224,0.019258466,0.00016159477,0.00043717198,0.00026023167,0.2878933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749714,0.0012779376,0.00009981364,0.00024413716,0.00069718016,0.0001837693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959765,0.0029005317,0.00027043148,0.00033235454,0.0003870301,0.00013307315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002569323,0.00036527784,0.00043121655,0.0013161096,0.002843253,0.0068241004,0.00070341915,0.0019860647,0.012717151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071697566,0.00028074044,0.00028403278,0.0016876454,0.014666541,0.007009754,0.0021432545,0.0031673668,0.0024059252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008551862,0.0000033300653,0.0000772952,0.000060803555,0.0000017881968,0.000025891315,0.0009833812,0.00011882765,0.000032686145,0.9362806,0.051102057,0.011304689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033606177,0.0000072037374,0.00042535912,0.0005594019,0.0000024417443,0.00005306065,0.0007056469,0.0001232252,0.0000784217,0.3668058,0.63122666,0.000009383481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051416354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005696425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012717151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007352711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003540528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053347886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W376257457","doi":"10.14264/240277","title":"Computer-assisted reporting and freedom of information","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The University of Queensland","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Journalism; Freedom of information; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Freedom of the press; Currency; Law; Public relations; Economics","score_opus":0.017078635374035495,"score_gpt":0.23701410369102677,"score_spread":0.21993546831699126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W376257457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2358836,0.045585588,0.120049454,0.08970797,0.0023924736,0.0006895543,0.0011016852,0.0012898971,0.5032997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95784914,0.005691124,0.018542202,0.003974938,0.0013904817,0.0002763285,0.00024045211,0.000117543146,0.011917935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9194534,0.05474707,0.005486747,0.0052029975,0.013092252,0.002017574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46129662,0.42039678,0.054735504,0.040764134,0.020273214,0.0025337967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.067189515,0.00042842177,0.0005172074,0.0062793037,0.0030581728,0.015649473,0.0019609157,0.0026556787,0.0058295717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2093897,0.0005138431,0.0007283894,0.0077971076,0.015644245,0.012964252,0.005622273,0.0033483098,0.0012975909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018791942,0.00012633507,0.022976557,0.00067873776,0.00006729265,0.00016105639,0.014027872,0.001408441,0.00093203975,0.7638854,0.009975087,0.18557337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017479442,0.00043558658,0.033485614,0.0027637403,0.00011891196,0.0012937644,0.008213164,0.0066964473,0.006755849,0.5762257,0.36339697,0.00043946767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036046663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015672358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067189515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047281515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005715747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35533637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W383050908","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation: A Constitutional Analysis, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 1 (2014)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.022336684305534434,"score_gpt":0.26828515493679234,"score_spread":0.2459484706312579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W383050908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063627146,0.008013085,0.001982854,0.1562399,0.0007131833,0.00027664963,0.003197755,0.00015385554,0.7657955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7454243,0.0058860197,0.0024820366,0.06947547,0.0003681981,0.0003492365,0.0007952381,0.0000989979,0.17512047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98716563,0.0008965271,0.00024854284,0.00083064585,0.005926544,0.004932009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922168,0.0026845182,0.00027485113,0.00034785716,0.0034207292,0.0010551404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005457245,0.00066428457,0.000587176,0.0034965968,0.033971176,0.015302517,0.0029682203,0.011394127,0.009667403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014347336,0.0009626866,0.0010101445,0.003790973,0.011446583,0.0027355237,0.0029082529,0.007555017,0.0007770945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027508873,0.00004276681,0.0024436237,0.00006568809,0.000017585055,0.00029457474,0.004012133,0.00031833025,0.0002248924,0.88431627,0.101059176,0.007177482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013812726,0.000060193885,0.029192153,0.0008557557,0.00027062473,0.0002428059,0.0106989015,0.002184128,0.0016150137,0.08007865,0.8743765,0.0002871413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98978347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99328196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11143375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11143375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24650243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8085122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W391647378","doi":"","title":"Television Advertising in Canadian Elections: The Attack Mode, 1993 ed. by Walter I. Romanow et al. (review)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; History; Mode (computer interface); Political science; Media studies; Art; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Operating system","score_opus":0.007529550314519036,"score_gpt":0.2503086018840835,"score_spread":0.24277905156956445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W391647378","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006657643,0.9964311,0.000018142515,0.0018013659,0.0003004396,0.0000029503005,0.000078660014,0.0000032497658,0.0012975073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001583252,0.99656016,0.000031012212,0.00048965885,0.0003106865,0.000004550579,0.000066702756,0.0000024003596,0.00095159723],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986865,0.00018834475,0.00008686332,0.00008506561,0.00076489936,0.00018833505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976005,0.00058967073,0.00029738992,0.000040312305,0.0012617989,0.00021038287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022512989,0.0015646755,0.0021100112,0.0077485237,0.0023084779,0.0056818076,0.0016521912,0.002626124,0.01106095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005406449,0.0010183607,0.00071502797,0.017427348,0.0029298717,0.0032025944,0.0010975165,0.0021607073,0.0035699797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006928072,0.000033527667,0.001208682,0.009776691,0.00013147685,0.00013683586,0.00068763766,0.0004586322,0.00009922595,0.0069955606,0.59450734,0.38589507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022815073,0.000020691663,0.014102303,0.009462018,0.0001775809,0.00031164486,0.00066300295,0.00009390961,0.000094796196,0.0016073459,0.973389,0.000054875658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75068146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89384484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24931854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026350494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04812754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5015736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200287446","doi":"10.1017/9781009039406","title":"Truth and Privilege","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Expression (computer science); Nova scotia; Political science; Centrality; Freedom of expression; Sociology; Human rights; Philosophy; Ethnology","score_opus":0.02095841906725396,"score_gpt":0.21198028903430685,"score_spread":0.1910218699670529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200287446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015682619,0.017216085,0.003490673,0.036856424,0.00077538,0.000023772332,0.00006149654,0.00002645155,0.925867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9043757,0.005537605,0.0007430161,0.0054019755,0.0009324595,0.000060314065,0.00005947595,0.000040529925,0.08284896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542075,0.0020737175,0.000120695644,0.0004093163,0.0010222702,0.00095323304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714786,0.0018975885,0.00017349928,0.00030925404,0.00021881805,0.0002529721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031194093,0.00044032832,0.0005013922,0.0027116463,0.010368314,0.012406602,0.0008976677,0.004028112,0.008097456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008120126,0.0002564095,0.00039283096,0.0015993578,0.07293731,0.013965045,0.006440192,0.004547484,0.00088916754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019182678,0.000002931013,0.000060287286,0.000009419507,6.7660034e-7,0.000022263495,0.0042258603,0.000023353692,0.000016938144,0.9920717,0.0014837673,0.0020808398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072929915,0.000013412764,0.00045640575,0.0001919626,0.000004005624,0.00011179207,0.0053177886,0.0000643561,0.00009724564,0.8047415,0.18898597,0.000008275493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020545868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017359512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020545868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010597504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069881734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07689059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W42011363","doi":"","title":"Is Free Speech Compatible with Human Dignity, Equality, and Democratic Government: America, a Free Speech Island in a Sea of Censorship?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Presupposition; Free speech; Jurisprudence; Democracy; Censorship; Government (linguistics); Political science; Human rights; First amendment; Law; Constitutional law; Sociology; Law and economics; Supreme court; Politics; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016221140783058845,"score_gpt":0.27160724122573715,"score_spread":0.2553861004426783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W42011363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1583782,0.005109645,0.007665535,0.21359782,0.00047473784,0.000024832458,0.00007833425,0.000042739444,0.61462814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829768,0.0014145956,0.001044568,0.006163939,0.00021870564,0.000024592304,0.000019154002,0.000016096417,0.00812148],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737716,0.0012128744,0.00006640244,0.00033583862,0.00047970616,0.00052802614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760723,0.0012583628,0.00032559733,0.0002641091,0.00023661292,0.0003080222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037337488,0.00016254178,0.00046925465,0.00060044765,0.006962417,0.011105647,0.0007436752,0.0043567275,0.0031782163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004552538,0.00018371694,0.00022529559,0.0011065023,0.05015069,0.010883093,0.005229928,0.0039099064,0.00042158033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005308051,0.0000064372634,0.0001803889,0.000009066973,0.0000011813158,0.000034238572,0.006230158,0.000025383259,0.00004175428,0.989242,0.0013750206,0.0028490517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001457333,0.000018035622,0.0013151286,0.00012538058,0.0000086886985,0.000082419254,0.017047929,0.00020916412,0.00016646844,0.9130589,0.06793497,0.000018308272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028238509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03364746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028238509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054644574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007565335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05614829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205552647","doi":"10.1353/ohq.2017.0039","title":"The Courtship of Eva Eldridge: A Story of Bigamy in the Marriage-Mad Fifties by Diane Simmons","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oregon Historical Quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Comedy; Memoir; Joke; Patience; Estate; Art history; Art; History; Law; Literature; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02009416375966023,"score_gpt":0.2804083751033026,"score_spread":0.26031421134364235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205552647","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069997884,0.0513915,0.00052350026,0.70984143,0.009263067,0.000035996065,0.000095537616,0.000043195116,0.15880792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.578516,0.028781578,0.0003412741,0.2057742,0.004248815,0.00007833525,0.000048332156,0.00007870052,0.18213277],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984125,0.00083743775,0.000023655235,0.000097889024,0.0002498566,0.00037863757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985839,0.0005911557,0.00011639718,0.000037220445,0.00014084141,0.00053045637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017742284,0.0004187364,0.00032067287,0.0005065502,0.018714458,0.0039526485,0.0010136019,0.0033501417,0.0050129234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043356293,0.00044006793,0.00026173127,0.00047852006,0.008795535,0.004527808,0.004067245,0.012121209,0.0009216825],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040077983,0.00007378108,0.0014250723,0.000074353375,0.00001368872,0.003638937,0.14999399,0.00007556361,0.0002049115,0.06347123,0.7670996,0.013888767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008681747,0.000038269733,0.00138901,0.0003945067,0.000005026249,0.0016092573,0.12887277,0.000053163938,0.00015037389,0.004649844,0.8628053,0.000023786117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027244298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062245656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027244298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034143154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028735579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054171443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234245804","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.48.4.499","title":"The Freedom of Information Act as a Methodological Tool: Suing the Government for Data","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Freedom of information; Plaintiff; Law; Criminal justice; Political science; Law enforcement; Politics; Mainstream; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.19275959034902068,"score_gpt":0.35423467881222415,"score_spread":0.16147508846320346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234245804","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055699237,0.04736479,0.46014848,0.29183975,0.011756239,0.002916055,0.0006939587,0.00015398503,0.12942754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6633403,0.012177496,0.26030937,0.04488104,0.0038693505,0.008079608,0.00027095462,0.00026129416,0.0068106255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.59743965,0.3741534,0.0073201223,0.0057785567,0.013324941,0.001983407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6364731,0.31272826,0.010395825,0.028234446,0.009658602,0.002509781],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21751787,0.0012431543,0.0011990388,0.014713874,0.012532545,0.01911657,0.0046130763,0.0081101535,0.002814898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29805848,0.0013094678,0.0012466836,0.010708009,0.06608563,0.02661105,0.01601007,0.009810317,0.00081406254],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032917225,0.000051376788,0.0015468161,0.00020599378,0.000018993918,0.00011170087,0.010896473,0.00019010167,0.00006679901,0.9712705,0.003909385,0.01169888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010725891,0.00011425798,0.0009971735,0.0026896351,0.000068414665,0.00031168925,0.027214885,0.0025213493,0.00064518745,0.8436146,0.12164264,0.000072942836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047036554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005275045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99529636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011371552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0175805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9649398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W424334400","doi":"10.4324/9781315224350","title":"Impasse and Grievance Resolution","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Grievance; Collective bargaining; Public sector; Dispute resolution; Compulsory arbitration; Mediation; Political science; Law; Negotiation; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.016315978911111403,"score_gpt":0.2663234995708394,"score_spread":0.250007520659728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W424334400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010395932,0.02032053,0.07693456,0.1057313,0.013854641,0.00053269265,0.00013886427,0.00043702126,0.7716545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3374337,0.012548733,0.025941784,0.016014855,0.0050953296,0.0004697143,0.00023357492,0.00031274575,0.6019495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98482126,0.0059913043,0.0007618847,0.0010481861,0.00563343,0.0017439266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746967,0.013715281,0.0014730025,0.0028433132,0.0053275805,0.0019442306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013545873,0.00048072205,0.0006768055,0.00266299,0.009957127,0.0087974975,0.0043088044,0.0051631317,0.044075795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06393217,0.0005193313,0.00076472946,0.0016129683,0.011409881,0.0071703177,0.009774235,0.008968863,0.008096043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041406853,0.000077659475,0.0008704377,0.00015441,0.000012139067,0.0011170221,0.009816337,0.00046964787,0.00026138755,0.70594686,0.15379232,0.12744036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009583977,0.000040282343,0.00077117095,0.00042436356,0.0000064421943,0.000654797,0.0060732192,0.00060336426,0.00041690638,0.18427286,0.8066884,0.000038578335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010391251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013022224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044075795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006708034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063713146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14744818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244162264","doi":"10.3233/ip-140324","title":"Brokering Access: Power, Politics and Freedom of Information Process in Canada, by Mike Larsen and Kevin Walby","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Polity","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Power (physics); Freedom of information; Process (computing); Political science; Political process; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.006776204647356664,"score_gpt":0.24707645942679557,"score_spread":0.2403002547794389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244162264","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049229622,0.08713845,0.0013978254,0.6902105,0.0013064177,0.00008428214,0.0012113686,0.000067762136,0.16935377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72399163,0.093146555,0.0023296196,0.032889333,0.0010818979,0.00010255782,0.0004477167,0.00015161287,0.14585906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953577,0.0007185216,0.00015166595,0.00046399134,0.0019275876,0.0013805754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98952687,0.0048089735,0.0004881614,0.00024761524,0.0029776306,0.0019507108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037622398,0.00066204753,0.0008032443,0.002921689,0.025335938,0.02185615,0.0019994285,0.006418298,0.007915143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018679455,0.00072816765,0.00043023357,0.009377251,0.015817627,0.008698596,0.0035427562,0.0063675945,0.0005560992],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009540062,0.00008594531,0.0073390445,0.0002911116,0.000059948474,0.00025515584,0.024196602,0.0017797628,0.00024196313,0.5667414,0.35471368,0.044199906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007182531,0.000018774957,0.032794207,0.0010188171,0.000077106335,0.00011887273,0.045100335,0.0028343273,0.00043156772,0.15889202,0.75838643,0.00025567372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99524987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99734783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14868401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14868401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24512291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246440081","doi":"10.5688/ajpe7958","title":"Minutes of the 2019 House of Delegates Sessions July 14-17, 2019 Chicago, Illinois","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Northeast Ohio Medical University; University of Texas at Tyler; National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities; Midwestern University; Wilkes University; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Idaho State University; University of South Carolina; University of Oklahoma; University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy; Touro University California; University of Pittsburgh; University of Arizona; University of Georgia; Oklahoma State University; University of Connecticut; University of Southern California; Creighton University; National Association of Chain Drug Stores Foundation","keywords":"Gerontology; Medical education; Medicine; Library science; Family medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.01780870085772078,"score_gpt":0.34638652059083463,"score_spread":0.32857781973311384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246440081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017983628,0.002274364,0.0005938892,0.030451221,0.050381463,0.00042942388,0.00544243,0.0006236775,0.90800524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001585089,0.00030524586,0.0001070375,0.0016280151,0.0011108082,0.00008288588,0.0006815209,0.00010377982,0.9943956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992341,0.000093602575,0.00002429417,0.00009957218,0.0003148656,0.00023362393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884003,0.00008180275,0.000039033297,0.00003378041,0.00050140684,0.0005039467],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012456801,0.0010109065,0.00042197396,0.0006914519,0.0045127477,0.0033542472,0.00062960613,0.0024436587,0.5771565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021503586,0.00041324418,0.00038292474,0.000517378,0.00041840543,0.001495847,0.002417418,0.0027461487,0.41617292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018773755,0.00001135542,0.000054599084,0.000009552178,3.2443768e-7,0.000009238769,0.00001640388,0.000004989397,0.00004588046,0.00032321675,0.99580246,0.0037032946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005429805,0.000008841611,0.0005570815,0.000027322008,6.734112e-7,0.0000058438086,0.00014550998,0.000018488494,0.000045596367,0.00009292969,0.99908805,0.00000426916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015139919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05458334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5771565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017322131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035780254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60313493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248276570","doi":"10.1017/s104909651100151x","title":"People","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh; University of California, Irvine; Western Carolina University; Colorado State University; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Long Island University; Claremont Graduate University; University of South Alabama; College of Charleston; University of Central Florida; Northern Arizona University; University of Ghana; Dartmouth College; Louisiana State University; University of Nebraska Kearney; University of Oklahoma; Illinois State University; Wayne State University; Valdosta State University; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; University of Connecticut; Brigham Young University; Texas Tech University; University of Cambridge; University of Pittsburgh; Syracuse University; American Political Science Association; Ohio State University; University of Washington; University of Rochester; Northern Illinois University; State University of New York; Princeton University; Texas Christian University; Jackson State University; West Virginia University; Florida State University; National Science Foundation; Purdue University; Rhodes College; Georgia Southern University; George Mason University; York University; University of Miami; Wellesley College; University of Maryland, Baltimore County; University of Minnesota; Yale University","keywords":"State (computer science); Voting; Political science; Representation (politics); Politics; Devolution (biology); Public administration; Enforcement; Public opinion; African american; Sociology; Law; Ethnology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.056838959266595296,"score_gpt":0.3263878300794043,"score_spread":0.269548870812809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248276570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0133893285,0.0044966037,0.001145676,0.032934304,0.007638419,0.00019660711,0.0023024357,0.00033034539,0.9375663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019241666,0.0014723663,0.00023210695,0.010223937,0.00035451166,0.00007600647,0.0006689186,0.00008069471,0.9676499],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915755,0.00012797455,0.000028095472,0.00015327155,0.00028142254,0.00025158896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908924,0.000065074484,0.00004364605,0.000084137915,0.00041050365,0.00030740755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080023846,0.00041883002,0.00038939703,0.00079927355,0.003768923,0.0036683625,0.00048121583,0.001013642,0.28408858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028133083,0.00017789961,0.00024986325,0.0008985766,0.00086754444,0.0026199552,0.002788144,0.0018162869,0.15205432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035451067,0.00003980355,0.002421285,0.000054816916,0.000004923436,0.0001415473,0.0031148042,0.000017400529,0.00029143255,0.034137666,0.8797452,0.079995684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022600113,0.000005087082,0.0007125661,0.000022691782,6.930585e-7,0.000047967227,0.0012976001,0.000006542672,0.00002609948,0.00081589475,0.9970599,0.0000027612919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010403506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012813859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28408858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012701452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017453524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288071802","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.52","title":"Balancing the Scales: The Role of the Canadian Supreme Court in Weighing Commercial Speech and Public Health","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Proportionality (law); Law; Commercial speech; Political science; Public health; First amendment; Medicine","score_opus":0.08208112767814006,"score_gpt":0.34503462867861423,"score_spread":0.26295350100047415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288071802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059575357,0.024403507,0.02974361,0.43050912,0.0022692285,0.0003258241,0.00024401248,0.00010804944,0.4528213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9183026,0.004642542,0.012719885,0.052117933,0.0009878473,0.00014743811,0.000055961413,0.00008802756,0.010937759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92447436,0.022460049,0.0023989796,0.0050983327,0.0375456,0.008022666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8837736,0.080349095,0.0028016104,0.002975095,0.0258134,0.0042871917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08671262,0.00076518947,0.0015931414,0.006752619,0.02522502,0.027063929,0.0062956205,0.014770211,0.003536506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17466334,0.0010249428,0.000898048,0.005360865,0.06614528,0.011686553,0.00869317,0.019981707,0.0003012174],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032188877,0.000012362728,0.001576689,0.00006486007,0.000036699377,0.00016099306,0.005361599,0.0004471957,0.00016049607,0.9618784,0.009559606,0.02070886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105710205,0.000052778712,0.009914284,0.0016968457,0.0003179581,0.00015045353,0.013996744,0.0040325536,0.0008536542,0.85423905,0.114338145,0.0003018917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8496379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9158765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15036207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09045459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19518583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6562971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295733443","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4201503","title":"Lost Synergies and M&amp;amp;A Damages: Considering Cineplex v. Cineworld","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Chemistry; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02504738889612775,"score_gpt":0.279096739690091,"score_spread":0.2540493507939633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295733443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09759599,0.0016671856,0.0034647398,0.06682117,0.00026362936,0.00011857903,0.00035465974,0.000047697085,0.82966626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94392395,0.0006588999,0.0007738369,0.015400517,0.0004139701,0.00011668537,0.000063498715,0.000025978583,0.03862272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571985,0.0011588561,0.00011655761,0.0005599975,0.00084823475,0.001596502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951285,0.0027808107,0.00041006377,0.00034242216,0.000686649,0.0006515055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004227816,0.0005146693,0.0007486794,0.0017644865,0.009281092,0.014370606,0.0027444959,0.023114726,0.016580561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011289485,0.00057074666,0.0013534254,0.0013143896,0.009933567,0.009148297,0.0056359493,0.01170649,0.0011146793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005026046,0.00005923367,0.0011683628,0.000026782018,0.000018987203,0.0008003778,0.0012958302,0.0009568384,0.0001611244,0.9790723,0.013189596,0.0032001927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013563367,0.0002625516,0.006808035,0.00038598664,0.00021610217,0.001086503,0.012152624,0.0058959723,0.0011937898,0.7982822,0.17341919,0.00016140187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0320597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059475787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0320597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008371716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006510608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063746154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322615364","doi":"10.29173/wclawr94","title":"Virtual Searches: Regulating the Covert World of Technological Policing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Government (linguistics); Political science; Emerging technologies; Universality (dynamical systems); Public relations; Law; Computer security; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07157165953987583,"score_gpt":0.3399310803626818,"score_spread":0.268359420822806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322615364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01577536,0.12590924,0.030118266,0.08145175,0.0020637896,0.00014461983,0.00014883977,0.00019021887,0.7441979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6817358,0.14676529,0.012114118,0.040589143,0.0032085811,0.00058647204,0.00026449395,0.00021733352,0.11451867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98821217,0.0071548303,0.0003529028,0.00059804507,0.0030810733,0.00060101156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907712,0.0068377513,0.0008576183,0.0005857846,0.0007579014,0.00018975629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057204287,0.00030027263,0.0005027561,0.0023547604,0.0023048576,0.011505898,0.001403874,0.0035084244,0.0033076184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010001226,0.000344712,0.00040385404,0.0020685843,0.01456268,0.00799619,0.0032526813,0.0037821068,0.0009381155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014252409,0.000019156521,0.00023428159,0.00050092326,0.000014563481,0.000052523643,0.0014989737,0.0006194848,0.00019091768,0.9123166,0.03403554,0.05050272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017207254,0.00006490464,0.0013457715,0.0019100212,0.000026137832,0.00015842567,0.0024665399,0.00075804075,0.00063730084,0.21544892,0.7771397,0.000026970827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067192744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011195353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011505898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003664678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006966128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030252814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377254410","doi":"10.1515/9780773580961-011","title":"Letting the Elephants Watch the Mice: The Surrender of Canadian Anti-Bribery Legislation to American Jurisdiction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surrender; Jurisdiction; Legislation; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.01856754626343703,"score_gpt":0.22381557516337824,"score_spread":0.2052480288999412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377254410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033687886,0.010445479,0.001135701,0.12335843,0.0014014601,0.00003506231,0.00016873154,0.0000879379,0.82967925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36087924,0.007600703,0.0013800836,0.035012215,0.00025820942,0.000041510797,0.00007565466,0.0001126891,0.5946398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756086,0.00022467987,0.000019271965,0.00016427117,0.00082981744,0.0012011352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985501,0.0003969878,0.000052929714,0.00005638155,0.0005728087,0.00037076048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018302205,0.00040081813,0.0003110461,0.0010301934,0.02297376,0.007098962,0.0017466539,0.0060610143,0.010212563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036265464,0.0004083015,0.00040957687,0.001286798,0.016937567,0.0025403814,0.0020576671,0.007219621,0.0008649523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032841035,0.000020759846,0.0015000675,0.000061483704,0.000009341699,0.00031812707,0.04874773,0.00026151203,0.00047860024,0.6444059,0.2738986,0.030265015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010814786,0.000013602399,0.004330455,0.00021323378,0.00002226448,0.000106208165,0.017285401,0.00017309071,0.00026424765,0.0150174005,0.962519,0.00004432992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99024373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062185507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062185507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.124444254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45118958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378070804","doi":"10.31542/cb.v5i1.2520","title":"The Abortion Debate","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crossing Borders Student Reflections on Global Social Issues","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Betrayal; Happiness; Abortion; Qualitative analysis; Psychology; Content analysis; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.05112047457574114,"score_gpt":0.47537328662825357,"score_spread":0.4242528120525124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378070804","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1802989,0.017459309,0.0019644096,0.42785665,0.0032510525,0.00007080252,0.000101469945,0.000033990702,0.36896345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92218554,0.002969834,0.00031721502,0.036852177,0.00085881416,0.000041407337,0.000028011142,0.00004946564,0.036697645],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814053,0.01495539,0.00017578693,0.000590851,0.0015634344,0.0013091373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98489326,0.012450221,0.00054947386,0.00035292518,0.00059044687,0.0011636112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012124606,0.00018171119,0.0003146527,0.000604991,0.014095591,0.007977501,0.0008962687,0.0054491195,0.008987064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01857096,0.00019116774,0.00029561447,0.00069905096,0.024042048,0.0043656784,0.0056075924,0.0063722325,0.0007818636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009435314,0.000032656993,0.002330195,0.00017787135,0.0000090095555,0.0019375714,0.4772119,0.00010856417,0.00064075564,0.4481127,0.044025358,0.025319183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010499073,0.00002445964,0.001332726,0.0003682976,0.0000043469267,0.00036215273,0.16971348,0.00007023216,0.0002729481,0.016167246,0.8116605,0.000013122903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009869077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0100403335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014095591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010192849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063904943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0739547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379433122","doi":"10.1353/see.2008.0136","title":"Ruling Russia: Law, Crime, and Justice in a Changing Society by William A. Pridemore (review)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Slavonic and East European Review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Psychology; Politics; Character (mathematics); Law; Political science; Social psychology; Media studies; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03119827313987035,"score_gpt":0.2726562592101601,"score_spread":0.2414579860702898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379433122","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022906046,0.99814415,0.000006947846,0.0011938383,0.00027055366,0.0000025509532,0.000008767418,9.522222e-7,0.00034939896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00045534823,0.99842775,0.000014223867,0.00065992033,0.00030672128,0.000004948279,0.000012731261,7.641445e-7,0.00011760078],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987293,0.00048015497,0.00019334722,0.00012732332,0.0004030369,0.00006687148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99534744,0.002890031,0.0007255438,0.0000715213,0.00072328333,0.00024212453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021267727,0.00073596544,0.0018084035,0.0034624855,0.0005119111,0.0022803694,0.0011201489,0.0023074963,0.006156991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007081305,0.0005696583,0.0008372795,0.004185317,0.0013838513,0.0024967112,0.0012922714,0.0029553613,0.0014885794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000591871,0.000046226804,0.00074265123,0.0752702,0.00050118106,0.00012101638,0.0003267327,0.00017917022,0.00008014417,0.005074824,0.27200544,0.6455932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040990762,0.00010868585,0.006289594,0.19905078,0.0005484284,0.0006514994,0.00047886532,0.00008188194,0.00005908302,0.0018416377,0.79081285,0.0000356854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010206144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02170768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010206144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019515211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00668748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02059716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383457116","doi":"10.1097/01.eem.0000946648.56133.a7","title":"Risk Aversion Trumps Risk Tolerance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emergency Medicine News","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Medicine; Chest pain; Feeling; Plaintiff; Aspirin; Family medicine; Medical emergency; Internal medicine; Psychology; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.03428392572227773,"score_gpt":0.3248279960389926,"score_spread":0.29054407031671486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383457116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08805758,0.011374615,0.107883334,0.27536568,0.004208556,0.00019268217,0.00016724798,0.00046326022,0.512287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9071111,0.0032515966,0.009002467,0.05046501,0.0025582018,0.00013668767,0.000048723734,0.00025301168,0.027173147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866195,0.0057421783,0.00048062045,0.0019899188,0.0034931437,0.0016746962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96723133,0.016931929,0.0035077645,0.0045047975,0.0037386513,0.0040855124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018359756,0.001009522,0.00097563857,0.0016547447,0.0029577396,0.011860507,0.0013520889,0.004435072,0.0144024715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05016995,0.0005244921,0.00075285183,0.0006084887,0.027052505,0.009486519,0.008719933,0.0128181605,0.0023369843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016255786,0.00015738409,0.008592462,0.00017116171,0.00013507903,0.000794141,0.008263731,0.0010746447,0.00063716486,0.89939755,0.02049025,0.060123846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006506162,0.00017463093,0.0027133233,0.0004491449,0.00004626681,0.0010096189,0.0028228885,0.001487523,0.00035759876,0.88567144,0.10512613,0.00007627511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024622784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014820168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018359756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003399359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046018944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0970968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080232","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3880","title":"Saving the News: Why the Constitution Calls for Government Action to Preserve Freedom of Speech by Martha Minow","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Misinformation; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Freedom of the press; Political science; First amendment; Interpretation (philosophy); The Internet; Law and economics; Law; Public relations; Sociology; Supreme court; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04633587260751777,"score_gpt":0.30485156536780866,"score_spread":0.2585156927602909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080232","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008439844,0.015493521,0.001884708,0.8730034,0.0054348665,0.000025008027,0.000039387407,0.00003414904,0.095645085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38328627,0.012828317,0.0035567854,0.46222526,0.01005623,0.00022031118,0.00006608264,0.0001691525,0.12759152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518365,0.0020862296,0.00019332893,0.00060322485,0.0011860119,0.0007475566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941796,0.004171048,0.00031158564,0.00027549232,0.0006362927,0.00042593965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075138835,0.00044842498,0.00038524173,0.00077838113,0.0119412895,0.011698367,0.0013414475,0.012749466,0.0031551728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015418601,0.00057080865,0.0004763056,0.0007860415,0.017717917,0.011660718,0.00340172,0.016478937,0.0008600262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001874867,0.000015050331,0.00023507861,0.000027706516,0.0000045093457,0.0001186866,0.004216562,0.00007569475,0.00013429228,0.8317234,0.15594804,0.007482301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024432315,0.00002670503,0.0006442782,0.00029089442,0.0000109285365,0.000121708756,0.003115337,0.00024457014,0.00051461434,0.18656948,0.8083912,0.00004574397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0185551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020498112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0185551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004705611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062375134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0397377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385854826","doi":"10.59962/9780774818735-009","title":"Kelowna and the Constitutional Debate about Public-Area Video Surveillance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.026045344300545285,"score_gpt":0.18627408710150156,"score_spread":0.16022874280095628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385854826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015414154,0.009377991,0.0016725906,0.060445137,0.00047028807,0.000054701726,0.00023009718,0.000057136593,0.91227794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50621986,0.0048823073,0.001442414,0.026652792,0.00041897572,0.00017633826,0.00013792457,0.00011994014,0.45994943],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948226,0.0011783333,0.00016804536,0.00068022875,0.0016442107,0.0015066664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940672,0.003553521,0.00021321887,0.00053849927,0.0012389114,0.00038870852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045569423,0.00041198693,0.00055778195,0.0014568722,0.013351442,0.015987145,0.0019425934,0.011000304,0.016723575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012492399,0.00074453506,0.00029513883,0.0020292674,0.017813556,0.005303726,0.0027855677,0.012433325,0.0013151973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016833468,0.000015245525,0.00021682784,0.000026694977,0.0000029127914,0.00006746198,0.002160642,0.00015327787,0.00012790355,0.9576749,0.028943278,0.0105938325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033008586,0.000016506188,0.0027119555,0.0005812154,0.00003171881,0.0000927348,0.0053035086,0.0006425069,0.0005825442,0.22121935,0.7686975,0.000087382214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79214066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85993135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20785934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043645073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03974448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41816688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388590835","doi":"10.52975/llt.2023v92.0021","title":"Constance Backhouse, Reckoning with Racism: Police, Judges and the RDS Case (Vancouver: UBC Press 2022)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Racism; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01550394707676329,"score_gpt":0.25092927777075436,"score_spread":0.23542533069399108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388590835","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045522176,0.06000375,0.00083499734,0.5590913,0.0032705127,0.00014761339,0.00035957425,0.0000566041,0.33071348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39800182,0.01787446,0.0008404783,0.20254493,0.0015251664,0.0003083209,0.00014511087,0.00018474332,0.37857497],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939567,0.0020011424,0.00019740923,0.0004793018,0.0009213549,0.0024440128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938731,0.0035247637,0.00021475519,0.0001606895,0.00096228695,0.0012643801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052432716,0.000742174,0.00084901875,0.0017146482,0.057816308,0.019362641,0.003981621,0.045925178,0.013683666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015079779,0.001485554,0.00054311234,0.0034050501,0.020291831,0.005931007,0.005513547,0.02738942,0.0018611186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006666737,0.0000721439,0.0029292018,0.00015748842,0.000024939161,0.002762407,0.07842473,0.00023569785,0.00020985314,0.2631114,0.6265115,0.025494056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055741857,0.000028220755,0.008349055,0.001321628,0.000051967825,0.00070111256,0.21530136,0.00016350897,0.00035049644,0.04118367,0.73234695,0.00014626437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8501508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9668396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14984918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023742173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04968998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3014633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388714595","doi":"10.1017/9781108995825.002","title":"The Traditionalist Approach to Privacy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dichotomy; Secrecy; Nothing; Internet privacy; Argument (complex analysis); Information privacy; Computer security; Computer science; Privacy software; Private information retrieval; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059520909815532895,"score_gpt":0.23060120669881962,"score_spread":0.17108029688328671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388714595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003092276,0.007829333,0.043899633,0.049843937,0.0009365856,0.00005607206,0.00012804677,0.00008516927,0.894129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47924864,0.016867695,0.03198606,0.03648918,0.004073428,0.00064256415,0.00021742235,0.00025918323,0.4302159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99448305,0.0020451061,0.0001488111,0.0008628973,0.0019606769,0.00049943425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794,0.0010998071,0.000118565025,0.00042519253,0.00031817946,0.00009815448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004190225,0.00063461455,0.0004974491,0.0012937802,0.0047328887,0.007254912,0.0017411611,0.0045408257,0.009446779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004465144,0.00037975563,0.0006973523,0.0018323777,0.041136958,0.010973292,0.003900886,0.009801252,0.0024340798],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.203341e-7,0.0000012413412,0.0000074878594,0.000005924277,4.4577612e-7,0.0000033988351,0.00016343163,0.000028276894,0.000006298793,0.9970342,0.0019428238,0.00080562785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030794586,0.000004731359,0.00002247569,0.000039154475,0.0000015198192,0.000037538823,0.000129957,0.00016210083,0.000044489265,0.9015116,0.098040305,0.000003086727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004512555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040367832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009446779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009370131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004884126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067985415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388987941","doi":"10.1515/9781552383193-005","title":"Not an Old Cowhand— Frod Stimson and the Bar IT Ranch <sup>1</sup>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.024011175007252,"score_gpt":0.20985707168190595,"score_spread":0.18584589667465395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388987941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020857106,0.07539269,0.0004819696,0.22197264,0.0107238805,0.000015296233,0.00008821702,0.000055392655,0.6891842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02143505,0.008837751,0.00022735784,0.033723816,0.0013891348,0.000018454055,0.00003263636,0.00009355044,0.93424225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993888,0.00019869607,0.00001589457,0.00009628531,0.0001700241,0.00013028271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952173,0.00016147505,0.000022573584,0.000034391534,0.00013822287,0.00012171562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010437538,0.0005038763,0.00042418408,0.00072477467,0.008756043,0.007023605,0.00081826065,0.0039664824,0.042322725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021650828,0.00047998712,0.00020043462,0.00080661185,0.007733262,0.0071462626,0.0025541866,0.00807727,0.008775769],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001648546,0.00001207398,0.000099524965,0.000033330998,0.0000021637213,0.0000481191,0.0038634615,0.000019760302,0.00004126334,0.1965498,0.7797783,0.019535646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002184586,0.0000026080722,0.00014758324,0.00008252318,0.000001139515,0.000022145581,0.002462665,0.0000075403195,0.000021198333,0.007842458,0.9894042,0.0000036874228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0946917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2758771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0946917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005486477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053837094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18828106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390126897","doi":"10.1017/9781009052047.006","title":"Police Interrogation Reform in the United States: Paths to Consider","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Suspect; Legislature; Political science; State (computer science); Deception; Law; Law reform; Right to counsel; Criminology; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.05525317091196257,"score_gpt":0.2637911277525445,"score_spread":0.2085379568405819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390126897","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012987083,0.085364655,0.001738221,0.56749415,0.0043980116,0.000091029804,0.000041590796,0.000083129766,0.32780212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52894723,0.10864232,0.007120267,0.19419579,0.0038089005,0.00062327017,0.00021737664,0.00016812647,0.15627667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933728,0.0043826182,0.00019482838,0.00024251384,0.0007058508,0.0011014225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99510115,0.0027676974,0.0002841193,0.00026151768,0.0010981802,0.00048731593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009137965,0.0003909779,0.00075910974,0.0011337266,0.009672034,0.016656306,0.0015623732,0.008278716,0.006836253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009197504,0.00051291776,0.0005461346,0.002131504,0.0113589885,0.013095314,0.0058078463,0.009735291,0.0008549987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027090055,0.000094132054,0.00035262934,0.00018283389,0.000007065933,0.0002778313,0.03556321,0.00028873922,0.00011960834,0.8001261,0.12026082,0.042699937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013106766,0.000040723262,0.00090397487,0.0012093922,0.000012268772,0.00010857465,0.056400087,0.00024136236,0.00023732668,0.07488413,0.8659184,0.000030661005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05639296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07160069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05639296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017458525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0240076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12667108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390284132","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-45347-2_4","title":"Racial Integration and Affirmative Action","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Race (biology); Political science; White (mutation); Racial equality; Law; Action (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Racism; Gender studies","score_opus":0.17431460304235513,"score_gpt":0.3928796704759999,"score_spread":0.2185650674336448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390284132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016116226,0.008379499,0.0018921962,0.024622016,0.0003899452,0.000019184039,0.000032164644,0.000011478736,0.9485371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84398276,0.0035279093,0.0013847308,0.004504478,0.00066552416,0.000089099834,0.00002918295,0.000022672566,0.14579369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763024,0.0013217522,0.000028580343,0.00022095385,0.00034377901,0.0004546889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989706,0.0006337761,0.00008325127,0.00012111174,0.00009514714,0.00009615034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031700642,0.0003900561,0.00046292957,0.0008422418,0.0067976797,0.0061084633,0.0009079865,0.0033170937,0.0102965925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037820118,0.00019674051,0.00027678366,0.001171779,0.028380899,0.003681808,0.0031475842,0.0044622077,0.00074342085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022007705,0.000006795408,0.000040475723,0.000003114899,6.8510855e-7,0.000004731985,0.00096653536,0.000023972632,0.000008925156,0.99643195,0.0011771341,0.0013334729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000664182,0.0000050170197,0.00036215867,0.00004934118,0.000002543981,0.000013107544,0.0017466504,0.00008524181,0.00005418397,0.9463138,0.051357444,0.0000039318393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016390774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020934144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016390774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041750213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044241296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034445524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390927157","doi":"10.1515/9780776621838-006","title":"CHAPTER IV Lawful Illegality: What Snowden Has Taught Us about the Legal Infrastructure of the Surveillance State","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Law; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.03173833477042393,"score_gpt":0.2250483223077567,"score_spread":0.19330998753733278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390927157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031643335,0.077784665,0.002767667,0.05598503,0.003559261,0.000054588032,0.00024311061,0.00010116909,0.8563402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.066075765,0.06594503,0.0018936286,0.02063115,0.0016259582,0.000045047207,0.00024023745,0.00021576701,0.8433274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992563,0.000118804215,0.000016337224,0.000110113644,0.00038031384,0.0001180661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993616,0.00021975039,0.000028564162,0.000051709158,0.000257025,0.0000813947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075509644,0.00049536425,0.0002685179,0.0010468464,0.004818882,0.006097461,0.0007275628,0.0029464946,0.015861988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014222817,0.00029357625,0.00026598165,0.001532798,0.01082168,0.004185707,0.0015591683,0.0052668895,0.0025938188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005626228,0.000013417334,0.00027017292,0.00014291269,0.0000038632634,0.00007873045,0.009678057,0.00018627956,0.00017173254,0.55703765,0.3823459,0.050065596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.360889e-7,0.0000026986977,0.00028498736,0.0003908263,0.0000018539512,0.000050173992,0.0013728095,0.000040668154,0.00010145474,0.025596287,0.9721505,0.000006718605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41384658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49628875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41384658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020647826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018441848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82287544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392021910","doi":"10.51644/9780889208605","title":"Breaking Anonymity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Internet privacy; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.018087779672866434,"score_gpt":0.26423032432840043,"score_spread":0.246142544655534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392021910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005027267,0.0027519083,0.031859193,0.050578065,0.0059161726,0.00014228506,0.001006622,0.0016183514,0.90110016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2572782,0.0045313663,0.01671061,0.03864312,0.003861656,0.0005583491,0.0019566654,0.0023428316,0.67411715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829843,0.005434731,0.00087370863,0.003118538,0.0051526134,0.0024361908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757401,0.0069141313,0.0010165833,0.00931546,0.0055983476,0.0014153396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008774633,0.0008400452,0.0008794344,0.0019339022,0.011968454,0.016177557,0.002820882,0.0054011513,0.117215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03916051,0.00066958496,0.0008860138,0.002497349,0.010021373,0.02125507,0.016305132,0.0077603343,0.042688474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005973166,0.000015891263,0.00052131014,0.00009752763,0.000014665498,0.00022214033,0.0051772385,0.00013734582,0.00020352671,0.7018526,0.20198718,0.08971081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007868538,0.000008438522,0.0001767195,0.00014074602,0.0000069731796,0.00015137721,0.0016857436,0.00016365547,0.00020983498,0.09052074,0.9069102,0.0000177034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009121214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0080501065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050022677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006629804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39212328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392905901","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4731623","title":"Advanced Constitutional Law: Free Speech","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Law; Constitutional law; Political science","score_opus":0.009425681393465285,"score_gpt":0.2751976409869994,"score_spread":0.2657719595935341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392905901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013041997,0.0357076,0.025963385,0.2209045,0.0047164247,0.0000673689,0.0006002732,0.00022748586,0.698771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79433,0.012897139,0.008387708,0.03397241,0.014869737,0.00028216306,0.00052436173,0.00021179422,0.13452473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962041,0.0020235502,0.00013079713,0.0006302227,0.0007299036,0.00028155942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947903,0.0037896577,0.00028503564,0.00055674376,0.00031385038,0.0002642875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062441994,0.00070677424,0.0009364929,0.0016519356,0.0036660973,0.012044572,0.001196236,0.016594213,0.021880053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017780107,0.00047287197,0.0004958324,0.0021385318,0.018520102,0.010842766,0.0036439851,0.009968175,0.0035681536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031252846,0.0000049038103,0.000022946148,0.000010837288,9.1972277e-7,0.000008558844,0.000108476845,0.00004827395,0.000017005683,0.9916837,0.0064266576,0.0016646502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015094234,0.000008453898,0.00014351035,0.00008050746,0.0000035760334,0.0000204967,0.00010005069,0.00028026238,0.000044696008,0.9505143,0.04878033,0.000008676061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0089389095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007517049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021880053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044616694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004213717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07319611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395059442","doi":"10.29173/alr2694","title":"Constitutional Change Without Constitutional Amendment - A Review of Constitutional Pariah: Reference Re Senate Reform and The Future of Parliament, Emmett Macfarlane (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2021)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Pariah group; Law; Political science; Constitutional amendment; Constitutional review; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.07726802497334977,"score_gpt":0.33505212557501396,"score_spread":0.2577841006016642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395059442","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000056481575,0.9858636,0.00005881775,0.00728525,0.0010613825,0.0000044733706,0.000028634826,0.0000043230184,0.0056369966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032450582,0.98314476,0.00012402702,0.00494737,0.0009115396,0.000011059522,0.000059438258,0.000009028464,0.0075478],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762076,0.00071610085,0.000101632526,0.00017062922,0.0011652876,0.00022552375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775535,0.0008361279,0.00011868811,0.00008315117,0.0010125908,0.00019418709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023583241,0.00072973454,0.00097095896,0.004026119,0.002294141,0.0040393802,0.0011145087,0.002220969,0.005461805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005753096,0.00049690076,0.0003685654,0.010695075,0.0060698623,0.0029844702,0.0013719322,0.0038331992,0.0017207479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002221168,0.000019698586,0.00022662785,0.003953755,0.00003628408,0.00008292932,0.00078252924,0.0002317985,0.0001574977,0.04938281,0.80619156,0.13891238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035786882,0.000005228447,0.0007441661,0.0019432062,0.000010204287,0.000041035404,0.00030835223,0.000016304646,0.000032689542,0.0043621873,0.99252445,0.000008514219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49019414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7222682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50980586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021833729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04948339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9746818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395067264","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i4.1367","title":"Reckoning with Racism: Police, Judges and the RDS Case","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.025843342562406908,"score_gpt":0.28535590776704206,"score_spread":0.25951256520463517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395067264","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31293383,0.009727582,0.00072820275,0.47868243,0.0012356623,0.00008530856,0.000086453205,0.00002188904,0.19649857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96201396,0.0016726296,0.00017308058,0.02540814,0.00054553273,0.000049767263,0.000016237698,0.000012490191,0.01010812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97700626,0.010541562,0.00055763,0.0014898046,0.0025300859,0.007874681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763591,0.013066578,0.0034466863,0.001023132,0.0018969966,0.0042075017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013271934,0.0004197541,0.0007960249,0.0021292455,0.035484355,0.013337724,0.003509255,0.02315805,0.006073039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047560647,0.00086803065,0.0008340513,0.002662832,0.033077117,0.0077899694,0.012017894,0.021507997,0.0006726335],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018815993,0.0002615885,0.019069452,0.000121991616,0.0000396736,0.019690702,0.18909495,0.00025731296,0.00025788412,0.61913335,0.12306068,0.02882439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000256223,0.0002636347,0.03922726,0.002480345,0.00015438642,0.011853716,0.5795978,0.0010376511,0.0008060461,0.18046217,0.18347836,0.00038244034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23827411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39984664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7617259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018584868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025968906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47377437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396714816","doi":"10.29173/mlj1352","title":"Purchasing Privacy and R v Picard: Dwelling Places on Public Property","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Purchasing; Property (philosophy); Business; Internet privacy; Marketing; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06845747299539985,"score_gpt":0.2847631322785204,"score_spread":0.21630565928312057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396714816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32790336,0.0036359422,0.0014256694,0.15108849,0.0006816654,0.00010157719,0.00025178844,0.00004262685,0.5148689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9143159,0.0013384066,0.00038767952,0.0374695,0.00031997595,0.00009174208,0.00002411442,0.00002288099,0.046029717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709415,0.0008112283,0.00006233005,0.00032254498,0.00034906054,0.0013607211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951539,0.0023602983,0.00036675268,0.00029041787,0.0006034269,0.0012251117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025784872,0.00040828608,0.00062442536,0.0008811984,0.018734144,0.009398843,0.0027991468,0.023066252,0.011959233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006899315,0.00069223123,0.0007423925,0.0016347154,0.017691521,0.0052426225,0.0062361,0.013541974,0.0006399741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061589024,0.00013343673,0.007323479,0.000035218898,0.000027789327,0.0010272487,0.017683608,0.00023254097,0.00018292657,0.9362752,0.031894974,0.005121921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000408392,0.00033207858,0.06617995,0.0013042632,0.00035945384,0.001330254,0.2441036,0.0024600057,0.0018773852,0.32972887,0.3514647,0.00045108577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55136573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69763774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55136573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009019802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022970011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9025527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396724679","doi":"10.61838/kman.isslp.3.1.4","title":"Impact of Anti-Discrimination Laws on University Campuses: Student and Faculty Views","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.059573054824984914,"score_gpt":0.3798760870846183,"score_spread":0.32030303225963336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396724679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944905,0.00015943461,0.00016356251,0.0015336641,0.000025399402,0.000013099952,0.000028522394,0.0000069447765,0.00357889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988135,0.00016259022,0.00005896411,0.00033232142,0.000015238765,0.000010062003,0.000011950759,0.000004188606,0.0005911734],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99085873,0.00514982,0.00044431133,0.00037744912,0.0017635071,0.0014060675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834478,0.0065762624,0.00320488,0.0005074883,0.0028382128,0.0034254293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009746578,0.00023842958,0.00047884148,0.0013158633,0.00575839,0.0066507077,0.0008213186,0.0011893825,0.0025159267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01816773,0.0002777271,0.00043424105,0.0014345278,0.0043676062,0.0032853663,0.0052039074,0.0020138954,0.0003077026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080530364,0.00017616276,0.16094713,0.00012739998,0.000025334446,0.0005706258,0.8086053,0.00015450708,0.0018432972,0.002150479,0.0013247421,0.023994451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030501512,0.00014730338,0.03966455,0.00007326823,0.00001088792,0.00019964902,0.95366806,0.00011810395,0.0005801293,0.00026178206,0.0052445135,0.000028695646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047464813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060416264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009746578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027044627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031936395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05154544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398489125","doi":"10.7910/dvn/mc7p4a","title":"Placer County, CA November 7, 2000 general election over/under report","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mitel (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Placer mining; Placer deposit; Geology; Archaeology; Geochemistry; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.024483585503663023,"score_gpt":0.29260320204378093,"score_spread":0.2681196165401179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398489125","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001946621,0.000045858815,0.000018749959,0.00007412324,0.00002706514,0.000008561612,0.9982406,0.0000949435,0.0012954437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00095353054,0.000077984994,0.000070105125,0.000048265832,0.000020062444,0.000057566016,0.99605286,0.00003571919,0.0026839348],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988558,0.00010068511,0.00015852501,0.00025776,0.00043372216,0.0001935315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964604,0.0005082681,0.0005846533,0.00046834548,0.0014942563,0.00048407764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011198454,0.0012365362,0.0012896642,0.0037697125,0.00086661335,0.0031127022,0.0019494893,0.0009563317,0.056822043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067859013,0.00081956456,0.00058943906,0.008628953,0.00032246846,0.001021224,0.001449912,0.0018366694,0.05044654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003042943,0.000006515176,0.0008992779,0.000096847674,0.000009167547,0.000006170375,0.0000067570577,0.000048248003,0.000007866173,0.00011958898,0.9980521,0.00071708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042572292,0.000021965265,0.040202327,0.00032275738,0.000048380003,0.00003275644,0.00014447472,0.00033168253,0.00018941483,0.0005625178,0.957685,0.00003312411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20679402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3259738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20679402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025802844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005783744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41118068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398762536","doi":"10.29173/mlj888","title":"Wedge Issue Politics in Manitoba: Bill 18 - The Public Schools Amendment Act (Safe and Inclusive Schools)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wedge (geometry); Politics; Amendment; Political science; First amendment; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.027618093188612716,"score_gpt":0.2831282439382165,"score_spread":0.2555101507496038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398762536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33425668,0.0057260483,0.0016380334,0.19603096,0.0012773805,0.0005660292,0.0020497143,0.00018721036,0.45826808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5323217,0.001880964,0.0021342398,0.084010705,0.00019509096,0.0004208816,0.00031175747,0.00013012913,0.3785946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99335724,0.0009599104,0.00017150465,0.00054632814,0.0014254657,0.0035395147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99479336,0.0016688185,0.00030104135,0.00016124712,0.0013519912,0.0017234485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042115822,0.000558266,0.0007326085,0.002028081,0.03357581,0.014273123,0.0037479284,0.012381072,0.020073647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076592467,0.0020643324,0.0007520231,0.0033078198,0.0073966393,0.003121633,0.007936511,0.012206338,0.0019477857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018620955,0.00033176737,0.025174988,0.00022282625,0.00008121482,0.0035195749,0.047848027,0.00081354746,0.0021684556,0.6759254,0.21932074,0.02440738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022142605,0.00015283171,0.10006536,0.0009999905,0.0002484745,0.0007101108,0.08992596,0.001508917,0.0031642755,0.03740603,0.7653033,0.00029333375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9529215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98935854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07526857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07526857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19108382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5461142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398995537","doi":"10.7910/dvn/qtoiqf/w3rusn","title":"felm_loop.R","year":2019,"lang":"hu","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Legitimation; Replication (statistics); Political science; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.03130742445592442,"score_gpt":0.2751374504407208,"score_spread":0.2438300259847964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398995537","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005896727,0.00008399326,0.00009712699,0.00008881446,0.000021332144,0.000010908888,0.99796057,0.0010719133,0.0006063786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00071714836,0.00014961294,0.00055883476,0.00017949476,0.000024115603,0.00024247618,0.9965431,0.000652655,0.0009326384],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807453,0.00045100314,0.00018774744,0.0006263048,0.00033494204,0.0003254232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99437946,0.0024282362,0.00051660213,0.0015345629,0.0006213199,0.00051992794],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025516925,0.0035052036,0.0029804888,0.0064145313,0.001431723,0.005599297,0.006128544,0.003869301,0.2745679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018080981,0.0014303079,0.0024174857,0.009572234,0.0010619442,0.0025407001,0.0043127793,0.0029546716,0.26923087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056696364,0.000014188629,0.0004297814,0.0010567555,0.00006585605,0.00001633148,0.00002066979,0.00016403431,0.000044450717,0.00068768597,0.99611014,0.0013334618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008300039,0.000030126168,0.002598713,0.00084526796,0.00010859481,0.00006112083,0.000058755562,0.00059326185,0.00035403416,0.0054153516,0.9890454,0.000059499765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016795283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020862542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7254321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019019716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034696318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91852117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399614158","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2024.2343266","title":"Sex after Technology: The Rhetoric of Health Monitoring Apps and the Reversal of <i>Roe v. Wade</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.012019727073897465,"score_gpt":0.2716246617896202,"score_spread":0.2596049347157227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399614158","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022675429,0.005088151,0.024827244,0.4891805,0.0064727683,0.00011781262,0.0000698684,0.0001831152,0.45138508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7604695,0.0022231443,0.008915602,0.13511801,0.0027194563,0.00039164445,0.000053559455,0.00033184368,0.08977729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815917,0.013322078,0.0005237245,0.0015865366,0.0021558602,0.0008200726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9626902,0.032406785,0.0010726987,0.0014672236,0.0018063259,0.00055677176],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02276729,0.0007104218,0.00046139403,0.0020663126,0.013120129,0.014612807,0.0017573092,0.012771909,0.004165429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03215756,0.0005952933,0.00066736125,0.000914449,0.056754686,0.014479957,0.007129066,0.017995968,0.0011379746],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001014837,0.0000070187125,0.000106816355,0.000035866047,0.0000026541534,0.000080274745,0.02627395,0.00003406176,0.00013029655,0.9595096,0.009672374,0.0041369433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026147987,0.00006935439,0.0003132698,0.00071191334,0.000025158868,0.00027218196,0.025630385,0.0005036671,0.0012307283,0.23817016,0.7329988,0.000048238846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007278403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005744276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006386992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004821398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12040639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399771523","doi":"10.32920/26052925.v1","title":"The Politics of Surveillance: Upholding the Privacy Rights of Racialized Peoples in the Digital Age","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; York University; Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Electronic surveillance; Political science; Internet privacy; Privacy rights; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Information privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.026777047038306287,"score_gpt":0.3110220715505712,"score_spread":0.2842450245122649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399771523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63414377,0.002226882,0.006299316,0.070281036,0.00025929924,0.000026954649,0.000044154196,0.000019252067,0.28669932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99452704,0.00029679594,0.00023888604,0.0022202698,0.000049059,0.000011114165,0.00000460511,0.0000044254652,0.0026477529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99208117,0.0058651357,0.00010295253,0.0004466717,0.0006665775,0.000837452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99225336,0.0055415216,0.0010363791,0.00050760916,0.00024799697,0.00041309712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007128719,0.0001549905,0.00018202177,0.0007151002,0.01286572,0.008073886,0.0006377089,0.0026380736,0.0037257061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0100575,0.00021066803,0.00024309814,0.0006048287,0.029446548,0.007669946,0.0067396224,0.00391726,0.0002979235],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058706224,0.00003514453,0.005853136,0.00002589715,0.0000050320677,0.00042337287,0.33733684,0.00007796634,0.0008604779,0.6299329,0.003362515,0.022027994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026144202,0.00008430933,0.012198776,0.00046428523,0.00002025505,0.0009469336,0.56075966,0.00068446354,0.0026904128,0.19318639,0.22889192,0.000046408113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009033267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066912444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01286572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032014605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002407993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037700713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399771550","doi":"10.32920/26052925","title":"The Politics of Surveillance: Upholding the Privacy Rights of Racialized Peoples in the Digital Age","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; York University; Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Electronic surveillance; Political science; Privacy rights; Internet privacy; Sociology; Criminology; Computer security; Law; Information privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.026777047038306287,"score_gpt":0.3110220715505712,"score_spread":0.2842450245122649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399771550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63414377,0.002226882,0.006299316,0.070281036,0.00025929924,0.000026954649,0.000044154196,0.000019252067,0.28669932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99452704,0.00029679594,0.00023888604,0.0022202698,0.000049059,0.000011114165,0.00000460511,0.0000044254652,0.0026477529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99208117,0.0058651357,0.00010295253,0.0004466717,0.0006665775,0.000837452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99225336,0.0055415216,0.0010363791,0.00050760916,0.00024799697,0.00041309712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007128719,0.0001549905,0.00018202177,0.0007151002,0.01286572,0.008073886,0.0006377089,0.0026380736,0.0037257061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0100575,0.00021066803,0.00024309814,0.0006048287,0.029446548,0.007669946,0.0067396224,0.00391726,0.0002979235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058706224,0.00003514453,0.005853136,0.00002589715,0.0000050320677,0.00042337287,0.33733684,0.00007796634,0.0008604779,0.6299329,0.003362515,0.022027994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026144202,0.00008430933,0.012198776,0.00046428523,0.00002025505,0.0009469336,0.56075966,0.00068446354,0.0026904128,0.19318639,0.22889192,0.000046408113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009033267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066912444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01286572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032014605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002407993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037700713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401016224","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v55i1.75676","title":"Diversity and Exclusion: Confronting the Campus Free Speech Crisis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Free speech; Political science; Sociology; Linguistics; Criminology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025009748494516548,"score_gpt":0.2909311027210279,"score_spread":0.26592135422651136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401016224","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1998852,0.0023729017,0.0016091925,0.5892417,0.0028649583,0.00002789529,0.000030223391,0.000057212586,0.2039108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93895954,0.0005631467,0.00024798588,0.028667495,0.0016721138,0.000041870175,0.000014482894,0.000065761815,0.029767603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98884517,0.00666467,0.00019906889,0.00046882062,0.0010794238,0.0027428677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794136,0.0094150165,0.0010155517,0.00066975655,0.0013094151,0.008176643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010772427,0.0003694998,0.0007617239,0.0012503369,0.0364717,0.02585204,0.001992906,0.011794565,0.014406669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02233494,0.0002592477,0.0004665062,0.0010979102,0.031900004,0.014099336,0.029159361,0.017615508,0.0016208915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020490264,0.00024015909,0.0049036723,0.00012044169,0.00002465908,0.001942573,0.34992665,0.00040496892,0.0005339175,0.44151708,0.14635882,0.053822175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005936953,0.00006668185,0.0032226474,0.00031909472,0.000013592484,0.00029621492,0.5259228,0.00043363846,0.00025960174,0.16953853,0.29980633,0.00006161267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011111891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0255583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0364717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006863317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015417587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056970716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403030937","doi":"10.1515/9780776638355","title":"Driving the Fake Out of Public Administration","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Computer security; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04379993219521636,"score_gpt":0.24446933968129372,"score_spread":0.20066940748607737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403030937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007149131,0.0064435946,0.0060964064,0.049697384,0.0017113587,0.000041731026,0.00006609716,0.00048493093,0.92830926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2167681,0.0050173225,0.002111742,0.0072751,0.00065340096,0.000062088446,0.000053287826,0.00032691009,0.7677321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969522,0.001174408,0.00006454909,0.0002760662,0.0010064365,0.0005264356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966273,0.0013815752,0.00023020204,0.0010186908,0.0005554778,0.00018678847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002569505,0.000544523,0.00034600217,0.0016899663,0.008608798,0.013349614,0.000668243,0.0030009586,0.012915821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008028234,0.0006294036,0.0004489344,0.0014539764,0.023604678,0.008783641,0.0033697658,0.00556734,0.006245599],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009154143,0.0000115215325,0.00019587211,0.000034168766,0.000002302817,0.000051878327,0.004106482,0.00019582784,0.000076229226,0.8756587,0.09215618,0.027501622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042491347,0.000011341749,0.00036250774,0.00011533718,0.0000033612682,0.00009229641,0.0020116926,0.0003617909,0.00024004429,0.06384574,0.9329413,0.000010260468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05109158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07023947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05109158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015393776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014516611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11169022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403058374","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4942006","title":"Getting Rid of the Riot Act","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer security; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.00862335489506106,"score_gpt":0.2675485647611254,"score_spread":0.2589252098660643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403058374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020126667,0.0031913517,0.001488957,0.26603928,0.003072229,0.00004215369,0.0001388623,0.0001539542,0.7057464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48098955,0.0023010985,0.0010276154,0.18907927,0.0033773743,0.00017054379,0.00014892155,0.00030463142,0.32260105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995046,0.0015538957,0.00016748578,0.000649224,0.0010947598,0.0014886077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99523383,0.0019093138,0.00051668315,0.00089945615,0.0005067573,0.00093399663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053691347,0.00032436228,0.000724222,0.00075969985,0.010549792,0.0065542012,0.0016266273,0.01767637,0.02361507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02863034,0.0003074844,0.0009258152,0.00059732515,0.012282973,0.0050467234,0.0057103536,0.01655907,0.0054330337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038702015,0.00006344906,0.001462827,0.000070476264,0.000034539316,0.00055661885,0.0058969087,0.00024969928,0.00027826973,0.6328536,0.33416104,0.024333905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003222248,0.00004742179,0.005247437,0.00026124952,0.00003546059,0.0004334487,0.0053622616,0.0002762531,0.00027154022,0.13706608,0.8509127,0.000053958287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014520806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01923425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02361507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015705986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005134199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079000235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403296171","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4948598","title":"\"Cell Phone Searches Incident to Arrest: Revisiting R v Fearon Ten Years Later\"&amp;nbsp;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Microbiology; Chemistry; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019013809712661672,"score_gpt":0.2956167584829322,"score_spread":0.2766029487702705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403296171","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0389397,0.002830704,0.0005146592,0.84514624,0.010500029,0.00017807564,0.0008611779,0.00018301401,0.10084633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.100474626,0.0019296445,0.00036668888,0.8041287,0.002916911,0.0002018485,0.00035259887,0.00016131086,0.089467615],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99526817,0.0006818106,0.00040155303,0.00068097876,0.00091375917,0.00205369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99065197,0.004599024,0.00061728014,0.00040157937,0.0015819047,0.0021482976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060576363,0.00048436405,0.000609895,0.0015104753,0.016885394,0.008047411,0.004435578,0.033497922,0.010885116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030429095,0.0007126935,0.00089481304,0.0011621309,0.0038238405,0.0050116824,0.0041788714,0.031690534,0.0032255827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010592154,0.00015112023,0.008468431,0.00016225704,0.00002430695,0.0050691334,0.010697172,0.00013608107,0.00059836224,0.026183482,0.92562103,0.022782674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001252007,0.00028055304,0.034891825,0.0019643852,0.00022439769,0.002297898,0.04436969,0.000494555,0.0014015203,0.009187263,0.90456575,0.00019704126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2923973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5859544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2923973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007869489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045366928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58139074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407159046","doi":"10.5210/fm.v30i2.13671","title":"Abolish privacy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"First Monday","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.01187491971928648,"score_gpt":0.2856728639158387,"score_spread":0.2737979441965522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407159046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040578134,0.009240691,0.021773871,0.26310393,0.011554764,0.00014693379,0.0004456566,0.0005817105,0.6890946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20982727,0.0076782717,0.010291594,0.34187487,0.010165651,0.00068746525,0.0005631081,0.00078959536,0.41812223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793848,0.0066269524,0.0013250788,0.0035359706,0.0070951087,0.002032023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795995,0.0119082015,0.0009323506,0.004510867,0.0022314189,0.0008177708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017234618,0.0008551833,0.000705953,0.0010335131,0.005879318,0.013003049,0.0022216071,0.015602502,0.014019866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03027191,0.0004825962,0.0013813114,0.00076231605,0.027672278,0.01535709,0.011008337,0.020597875,0.0056693433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008286264,0.0000110984465,0.00006478975,0.000055333483,0.000004951372,0.000033785833,0.0010851489,0.000056513374,0.00015436871,0.9420968,0.04750891,0.008919974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013387645,0.000018086588,0.00014311673,0.0002090662,0.000010801478,0.0000890175,0.00036194056,0.00012838253,0.0005303381,0.15427592,0.844199,0.000020935098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057996092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004598853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017234618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005215923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0100759845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09114647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407872008","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-82463-0_5","title":"US Education Culture Wars: The Right in a Democracy to Exposure to a Plurality of Views","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius gentium","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021077908195641037,"score_gpt":0.30684246250427205,"score_spread":0.285764554308631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407872008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013388391,0.0038179862,0.00254863,0.09255287,0.0011440443,0.00001828528,0.000044623754,0.000054066368,0.8864311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7042706,0.002025664,0.0016798151,0.025847971,0.0006607323,0.000089839574,0.000056397326,0.00014068688,0.26522836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995466,0.0027757182,0.00008604233,0.0002662171,0.0007319082,0.0006740192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975877,0.0013272916,0.0001473085,0.00026789762,0.00027857078,0.00039122385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003553995,0.00048031693,0.00036249848,0.0009734501,0.011967512,0.014616713,0.0007732353,0.0043674735,0.01345697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054713916,0.0003274541,0.0003096974,0.0014216339,0.027340062,0.010224663,0.006003331,0.011798462,0.0016359432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038163557,0.000008494834,0.00006220103,0.0000056312965,0.0000014190688,0.000015107198,0.007318722,0.000023996556,0.000025249636,0.96731603,0.019981049,0.0052382546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006319907,0.000005881527,0.00024345693,0.00009828981,0.0000033193191,0.000047354617,0.014455234,0.00014851513,0.00018032875,0.5330371,0.4517651,0.000009086651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022998946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039406657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022998946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076050735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009249953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05517894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408092884","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1452","title":"Exploring the Intersectional and Spatial Implications of the Police Power to Search Dwellings Incident to Lawful Arrest: A Comment on R. v. Stairs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stairs; Power (physics); Architectural engineering; Sociology; Geography; Engineering; Civil engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.09057996816577145,"score_gpt":0.3447645751527907,"score_spread":0.2541846069870192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408092884","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25023404,0.0037821538,0.003884138,0.55034614,0.0027789397,0.000148024,0.00037069916,0.00013235824,0.18832359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84654504,0.0017233772,0.0008698365,0.11591647,0.0011545417,0.00007210204,0.00008015583,0.00009207913,0.033546284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98935074,0.0018296713,0.00039073132,0.0015412249,0.0026704278,0.004217181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871546,0.0072507714,0.0005401706,0.0005237683,0.0034233583,0.0011073116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00856492,0.00067442283,0.0007760652,0.0012738063,0.039569885,0.013564339,0.006434632,0.020507522,0.002956722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017679632,0.0009639583,0.0014412187,0.0017735013,0.028297132,0.0044899764,0.0068793,0.028249497,0.0004708563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014901288,0.00006572704,0.008181801,0.00017243599,0.00008320435,0.0041169804,0.2568035,0.0008240351,0.0016325468,0.56778234,0.14447112,0.015717337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104107436,0.00015495653,0.02132321,0.0009018692,0.00030374713,0.00079844514,0.4376927,0.0015105953,0.003127748,0.055984803,0.47762153,0.00047635776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91420937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94450194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91420937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037160885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058961365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2696224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411080002","doi":"10.63315/cjnsoa.v42i1.2906","title":"AFTER THE INJUNCTION: THE ROLE OF THE COURTS IN POLICING INDIGENOUS RESISTANCE IN B.C.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of native studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Resistance (ecology); Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.012759450927546118,"score_gpt":0.28448961148189955,"score_spread":0.27173016055435345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411080002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8223903,0.0011823403,0.0028331983,0.031191237,0.00011340814,0.00011527001,0.00004818219,0.000032336735,0.14209367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935262,0.00016655956,0.00035346916,0.0017935196,0.0000133605145,0.000014964963,0.0000074193936,0.0000051791176,0.00411931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98701394,0.0036581908,0.0002241078,0.00080584455,0.0026878244,0.005609961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98344535,0.007814107,0.0024027978,0.0004916473,0.0037243098,0.002121827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006843324,0.00018884985,0.00034393338,0.0024715355,0.022736143,0.009996667,0.001861675,0.0042769676,0.0049639973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042120155,0.000268103,0.0002660273,0.0018054241,0.011106788,0.0044022044,0.004874569,0.0049886657,0.00032978877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020178195,0.0003200704,0.1536396,0.00015477158,0.000074966585,0.005000514,0.30090132,0.0014847724,0.003001526,0.37759474,0.021678813,0.13594702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005645235,0.00018987585,0.26077244,0.00069715624,0.00015664048,0.0008561408,0.5803991,0.004247047,0.0023102227,0.054662198,0.09543678,0.00021592138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67897564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.833264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32102436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028438255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038493767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64582986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411731607","doi":"10.54014/zqx0-8arf","title":"The First Amendment on Trial: Hate Speech, Free Speech and College Campuses","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; First amendment; Political science; Commercial speech; Speech act; Law; Linguistics; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02162840906069124,"score_gpt":0.29637707713289607,"score_spread":0.2747486680722048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411731607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16389301,0.015527157,0.005425667,0.12801531,0.0019552156,0.000102452366,0.000053187996,0.000028424802,0.6849996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593785,0.0029112895,0.00063680956,0.014787541,0.00046463346,0.000080483536,0.000017060956,0.000020791984,0.02170294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98888457,0.0065632667,0.0003670411,0.0008353215,0.001671934,0.001677848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97511077,0.019382702,0.0018573201,0.0011826411,0.0014010037,0.0010655718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010937756,0.00026292127,0.00042627574,0.0012735866,0.010158087,0.013066473,0.0012310845,0.008472992,0.005659393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032321163,0.00021623707,0.0003731761,0.0013353678,0.03168566,0.008256759,0.005981767,0.010349033,0.00055745617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020347112,0.00004245845,0.0010908706,0.000036458987,0.0000037693442,0.00022573561,0.009585368,0.00011377446,0.000072242445,0.97451234,0.005108884,0.009187804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008870813,0.00013909324,0.0069336067,0.0016587221,0.000038956183,0.00049119414,0.050212942,0.0009954692,0.001297102,0.65775484,0.28028956,0.000099839264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015817093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020927532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015817093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073127686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011396889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057845056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413465339","doi":"10.29173/mlj1390","title":"Proving Deprivation in Criminal Fraud: Has the Court in R. c. Landry Cast the Net Too Wide?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Net (polyhedron); Criminology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03551174348957167,"score_gpt":0.2756371328767645,"score_spread":0.24012538938719283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413465339","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08262001,0.0062968056,0.0038136623,0.79804736,0.0017004779,0.00006863986,0.00009176099,0.000030414345,0.107330814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7474965,0.0027985252,0.0024322611,0.22817174,0.0016138563,0.00007603386,0.00004781039,0.00003730237,0.017326036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989433,0.0031017032,0.00036706973,0.0010647702,0.0032861836,0.0027473017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99022305,0.0044903266,0.0005508378,0.0004850015,0.0028551538,0.0013957045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014835537,0.00047655153,0.001163909,0.0013763136,0.01375489,0.012228165,0.0039541977,0.019210292,0.002740341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036973473,0.0005258845,0.0010472639,0.0013213482,0.026781647,0.009158236,0.0076538124,0.019998387,0.00064665335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095705625,0.00006476866,0.005968348,0.00008771911,0.00006244603,0.0011391736,0.011788564,0.0003726699,0.00060275674,0.90476537,0.052998833,0.022053583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018560608,0.00025713153,0.013887569,0.0011445906,0.00021480003,0.00079470413,0.034661118,0.0026634834,0.0022673921,0.74227756,0.20132104,0.0003250627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2847798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2832966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7152202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015693504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021944253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56624436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413496929","doi":"10.64628/aam.dsryp7wfd","title":"Campus tensions and the Mideast crisis: Will Ontario and Alberta’s ‘Chicago Principles’ on university free expression stand?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Political science; Public administration; Management; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02286891759636104,"score_gpt":0.23368233916888606,"score_spread":0.21081342157252503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413496929","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079510264,0.0028931496,0.0007264861,0.6090462,0.0009585095,0.000021769727,0.00009575108,0.000045745874,0.30670208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8051301,0.0012460153,0.00041628323,0.08132184,0.0004112345,0.00004260037,0.000045525736,0.00008654357,0.11129975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99445194,0.0011020871,0.00009620153,0.00032357758,0.0009441063,0.0030821431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910193,0.0018128029,0.0004739144,0.00030629174,0.0011632749,0.0052243313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046198512,0.00024131467,0.00042902684,0.0010098038,0.032836735,0.027111467,0.0024845495,0.013352742,0.018832104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010681032,0.00040826784,0.00033899094,0.0017511677,0.032978706,0.009617025,0.008444761,0.011979674,0.0012455478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009579159,0.000066878536,0.004863226,0.00004264141,0.000011115533,0.00026477213,0.06256362,0.00016858669,0.00020441701,0.74169284,0.17078996,0.019236207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055324137,0.000020116973,0.011673993,0.00027631075,0.00001880954,0.00007917995,0.22129034,0.00032074592,0.0002464472,0.08385673,0.68205273,0.000109303655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8895755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95044416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92862135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07137863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09668068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5178907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413512407","doi":"10.64628/aam.jky334d4s","title":"As Joe Biden becomes president, here’s an easy proposal for Electoral College reform","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.029718216822465816,"score_gpt":0.3257637354787722,"score_spread":0.29604551865630635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413512407","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002246753,0.0008068549,0.0007246589,0.9394747,0.02478443,0.000029688112,0.00003326033,0.000049225902,0.03185031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058201347,0.00091962225,0.0035664614,0.6193369,0.014504914,0.00012637301,0.000082270926,0.00013979415,0.3031224],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944601,0.0016237504,0.0001763251,0.0004334663,0.0013930697,0.001913312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882781,0.002117762,0.00031680465,0.0004061216,0.0022004205,0.0066808593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059977453,0.00038206857,0.00074317824,0.0005721053,0.012662999,0.013040058,0.0012398715,0.016883755,0.028755596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02330246,0.00042347342,0.0009022033,0.00034527952,0.0043491595,0.0073096217,0.0050513847,0.02478057,0.006835013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003314845,0.00008751646,0.0007107978,0.000026221958,0.0000074216728,0.00014849872,0.0007290348,0.000054749275,0.00022389901,0.08546861,0.9024032,0.010107003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028273847,0.00004109754,0.0011616979,0.00007857997,0.000008263585,0.00007663787,0.0038551292,0.00021199179,0.00017804623,0.017909054,0.9764117,0.000039526738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010973566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056099348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028755596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031423848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011210386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09619707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413603406","doi":"10.64628/aam.ducuqvu4u","title":"Even after an indictment on federal charges, ‘persecuted’ Donald Trump could win again","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Indictment; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.060560573939399606,"score_gpt":0.32676001636898194,"score_spread":0.2661994424295823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413603406","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012644676,0.0011402259,0.0019079862,0.64215326,0.019108962,0.000060237093,0.00018752198,0.00015936288,0.32263774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15902035,0.00041954123,0.0014335876,0.31859353,0.0034363032,0.00010638538,0.00010034972,0.00026575528,0.5166242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949811,0.00071191916,0.00014276888,0.0006279142,0.0019830414,0.0015532062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955539,0.0019713347,0.00014471496,0.00035185544,0.0013516443,0.000626623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042407736,0.0005736642,0.00070824346,0.0009844088,0.012735424,0.009973908,0.0014921587,0.023752969,0.030349389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03233247,0.0004924029,0.00081514695,0.0007019376,0.0054931752,0.0059631458,0.0038085063,0.023382816,0.0072328565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004496808,0.000033596098,0.00039573255,0.000017130335,0.000016757736,0.00019135783,0.00095316535,0.000057265752,0.00023371834,0.51108587,0.47964638,0.0073240874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034886893,0.000025832887,0.00062746985,0.0000676097,0.00001814713,0.000085133775,0.0012088763,0.00034798056,0.0007604183,0.08734765,0.90941674,0.00005929894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030187592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05225481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030349389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062942607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006133009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10152888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413675063","doi":"10.64628/aam.ftee4rahp","title":"Protecting free speech on campus: A solution in search of a problem","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Computer science; Speech recognition; Political science","score_opus":0.051048122397204215,"score_gpt":0.323716645129878,"score_spread":0.27266852273267383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413675063","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044725936,0.0050778426,0.08728542,0.674358,0.0022393255,0.000097842,0.00033632983,0.000309442,0.18556997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9034342,0.0045675216,0.020993676,0.028109968,0.004671436,0.00022380473,0.00021612276,0.00024611948,0.037537217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929074,0.00290044,0.00032472948,0.0015140764,0.0012911668,0.0010622812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95265007,0.027962174,0.0026675514,0.008705658,0.004563641,0.0034509045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012895849,0.0006750913,0.0013541101,0.0021347387,0.0071331747,0.012397788,0.0026058597,0.011961368,0.016846532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049167335,0.00038103847,0.0007728728,0.0018878388,0.020372428,0.022388138,0.009584683,0.012834178,0.0026371153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028858729,0.000041880583,0.00051150366,0.00006910798,0.000014207277,0.000065385146,0.0009777509,0.00061768654,0.00022378324,0.9617258,0.014540789,0.021183323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020808084,0.000014523585,0.00032804607,0.0001235322,0.000012003615,0.0000675214,0.001586427,0.001089778,0.00028881987,0.9627528,0.03369686,0.00001888767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061163516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003924801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016846532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046073627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011850373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06820059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413724505","doi":"10.64628/aam.necca63ww","title":"Trump may have emboldened hate in Canada, but it was already here","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04568756184347247,"score_gpt":0.2991527681941784,"score_spread":0.25346520635070596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413724505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14052345,0.0027502058,0.0029301443,0.39056414,0.0049377624,0.00009843428,0.0011845625,0.00021134755,0.45679998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5404732,0.00092084776,0.0007601491,0.06301242,0.00038674788,0.000027450722,0.0002153386,0.00013734933,0.3940665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583155,0.00024230673,0.000048848888,0.00037066,0.001208053,0.0022987179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951218,0.000539512,0.00019428835,0.0001524853,0.0023373964,0.0016544113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002114046,0.00041908765,0.00047581663,0.00098792,0.03128839,0.007989793,0.0012712682,0.008138835,0.024735978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007789538,0.00033240806,0.00055225095,0.0011461104,0.010093006,0.0031325745,0.0023436372,0.012045718,0.0013709996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017859493,0.00010048342,0.023956535,0.000113223,0.00010851303,0.0012389831,0.026798137,0.00046023837,0.0012892296,0.4915959,0.4184328,0.035727315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032560438,0.000048270587,0.024410186,0.00016859261,0.000040088078,0.00013626445,0.0226324,0.00040384682,0.0011833623,0.016526736,0.93425816,0.00015944698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.984537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0574475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0574475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.075891316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41681272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414662811","doi":"10.1163/9789004322714_cclc_2021-0063-257","title":"Protecting Manitobans Advancing Manitoba Speech","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Climate Change and Law Collection","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.04661958380561915,"score_gpt":0.29723675257796556,"score_spread":0.2506171687723464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414662811","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001579323,0.0001321691,0.000039361454,0.00023147072,0.000029974526,0.000012521581,0.9960601,0.000080941645,0.0018341437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0041368245,0.00015689603,0.00018710709,0.000104064544,0.000010926873,0.00009875285,0.991912,0.000038482773,0.0033549543],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991721,0.00015793108,0.00007099312,0.00016687928,0.00023773471,0.0001943742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961719,0.0009645163,0.00039326528,0.0006267381,0.0013984052,0.0004451777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013486634,0.0011464522,0.0008375918,0.0043480634,0.0012640294,0.0025834083,0.0017712614,0.0014685749,0.033326652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007527441,0.00050662266,0.0006993112,0.007922819,0.000422719,0.0007117314,0.0017718357,0.0014714075,0.019684352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010079281,0.000044245444,0.010209137,0.0005950929,0.000052161868,0.000054534576,0.00015400966,0.00056977273,0.0001269667,0.0013390324,0.98190534,0.0048488937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001659788,0.0000143860725,0.053028744,0.00082647253,0.000059237187,0.00004104046,0.00083847664,0.0010218814,0.00046305676,0.00112389,0.942385,0.000031749863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43162644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6257167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56837356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004074965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008527821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8582282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415244180","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.4103","title":"The Law of Racial Profiling","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racial profiling; Profiling (computer programming); Charter; Racism; CLARITY; Adversarial system; Harm","score_opus":0.015172204839074131,"score_gpt":0.3001060235199659,"score_spread":0.2849338186808918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415244180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008889537,0.011304577,0.030143663,0.056920514,0.0019778102,0.000086406966,0.00015016775,0.000106345244,0.8904209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7191142,0.010828346,0.014732442,0.06426482,0.004610127,0.0005715142,0.00016609766,0.0001746475,0.18553783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98718387,0.004942228,0.00048735284,0.001980874,0.0038828335,0.0015228789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946345,0.0028701841,0.00053389283,0.00087980245,0.00083700597,0.00024458495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076233814,0.0006092878,0.0005704304,0.0014445502,0.010781251,0.009978557,0.0013355961,0.008759358,0.008104421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014986911,0.0005749037,0.0007904826,0.0012938023,0.03226835,0.006942089,0.007174073,0.009499294,0.0020704465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016586442,0.0000020783295,0.00006844506,0.000007992226,0.0000011783812,0.000019132482,0.00040534415,0.000038227226,0.00002658223,0.9934529,0.0033551406,0.0026213124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012329171,0.00001921303,0.00041628597,0.0002677628,0.000014828341,0.00018892418,0.0006271342,0.00047660424,0.00023204875,0.67500496,0.32271394,0.000025927291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011025123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077933795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011025123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005209005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062185423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04031676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415244188","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.4102","title":"Doing Away with Racial Profiling in Policing Without Doing Away with the Rule of Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Racial profiling; Habeas corpus; Profiling (computer programming); Judicial review; Appeal; Remedial education; Human rights","score_opus":0.010888310416521853,"score_gpt":0.2799812471651342,"score_spread":0.26909293674861234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415244188","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038820863,0.010656172,0.061710566,0.5172644,0.0025247296,0.0001570276,0.0000845308,0.0002500616,0.3685316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86588424,0.006518936,0.026849983,0.075294316,0.0015655654,0.00013005042,0.00004749366,0.00015591086,0.023553468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98418355,0.005096336,0.0003376856,0.0017273524,0.0053596534,0.0032953222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925972,0.002590652,0.0008652992,0.00095525564,0.0017524958,0.0012389957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011063804,0.00093797257,0.0008777384,0.0024938486,0.021707177,0.014838254,0.002597147,0.006996371,0.0034489052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021520216,0.00052815484,0.0006793626,0.002211358,0.06706466,0.010821122,0.007882832,0.010322082,0.0008211155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016009184,0.000024765945,0.0030823394,0.00007421906,0.000015906386,0.00009298614,0.010364207,0.0006780979,0.00026217732,0.94187826,0.011858933,0.031652074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030118637,0.000073312396,0.0056990543,0.00091003213,0.000073053394,0.00016887591,0.018824905,0.0016863539,0.00091478217,0.744263,0.22724083,0.00011581383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42953503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57111096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42953503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026644401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06390665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8540697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415570594","doi":"10.1017/beq.2025.10085","title":"The Danger of Contextual Integrity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Yale University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Adversarial system; Sociality; Data integrity; Contextual design; Context analysis; Personal Integrity","score_opus":0.057513871347640806,"score_gpt":0.3485667971884821,"score_spread":0.2910529258408413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415570594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018741738,0.012983573,0.13079168,0.5608157,0.003497146,0.00013702159,0.00023418537,0.0004447683,0.2723543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8156194,0.0081692515,0.034685124,0.10715297,0.004941493,0.0004901707,0.00019527622,0.0006596182,0.02808679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94580984,0.033578712,0.0019736132,0.0061563854,0.010287936,0.0021935645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8977744,0.058854852,0.004766061,0.024583677,0.011296914,0.0027241274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042589407,0.00062711636,0.001273178,0.0020516699,0.011964502,0.017190881,0.0037022298,0.007890775,0.007339296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07804251,0.00080148847,0.0009686444,0.0017747815,0.083083615,0.03337049,0.016734336,0.019038705,0.002405535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011759412,0.000004895409,0.00018201952,0.000057622936,0.0000064934206,0.000054497952,0.004662413,0.000084797866,0.00006838646,0.9825813,0.0054787486,0.0068070237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009735671,0.000013199976,0.00015703125,0.00033742315,0.000012388801,0.00017824525,0.004456038,0.00027641148,0.0003022351,0.8416789,0.15255456,0.000023796401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054116766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037496113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042589407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006620929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011987166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22523701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415814509","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5695862","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause in Context: Purposive Interpretation and Section 33's Place in the Constitution's Structure","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Charter; Section (typography); Judicial interpretation; Statutory interpretation","score_opus":0.007493425341817342,"score_gpt":0.27346859612305563,"score_spread":0.2659751707812383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415814509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1327194,0.004276435,0.2755386,0.029319469,0.0022971218,0.0010419489,0.00038166041,0.00017211876,0.5542533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367329,0.0010541681,0.04478464,0.0039480217,0.00060212833,0.0010101765,0.00020124333,0.00017025908,0.011496468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9809229,0.013380985,0.0006358458,0.001846382,0.0023766984,0.000837149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803125,0.015131712,0.00101114,0.002097732,0.001229596,0.0002172911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02200487,0.00045947192,0.00071293296,0.0018537191,0.0058159498,0.009081303,0.0014907456,0.0028958844,0.0033549117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038219884,0.0006854649,0.00046323508,0.0021021792,0.019994404,0.0065019587,0.004519799,0.006693888,0.00057307206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012181356,0.0000058393807,0.00031985663,0.000020690439,0.000002290038,0.00009594079,0.0050521176,0.000092433045,0.00017273823,0.9888403,0.0009094362,0.0044761305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003410815,0.000041721294,0.001246537,0.0004491673,0.000027595874,0.00016304805,0.0036803186,0.0012156744,0.0011144278,0.902478,0.08951399,0.000035325327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003585304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064601833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003465743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049234447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116374254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417350212","doi":"10.24908/ss.v23i4.19989","title":"Review of Collier’s Tor: From the Dark Web to the Future of Privacy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Deep Web; Information privacy; The Internet; Privacy software; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.012008871972345696,"score_gpt":0.28888133762349666,"score_spread":0.276872465651151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417350212","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008454956,0.97953874,0.00010261639,0.016747952,0.0016748607,0.0000034333834,0.00003533364,0.0000039352526,0.0018086917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002305857,0.98361474,0.00011031372,0.009417532,0.0037813326,0.0000090627045,0.000049415965,0.0000069016337,0.0007048013],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980426,0.0009260507,0.00018660366,0.00017522371,0.00050899945,0.00016063814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792411,0.015690701,0.0009505245,0.00040372065,0.003037077,0.0006768787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042136568,0.000642047,0.0013907579,0.00442251,0.0009379033,0.0042585623,0.001413046,0.004202551,0.007138972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018763151,0.0003885364,0.000692254,0.0046933354,0.0036445148,0.0075257174,0.0021596455,0.004684365,0.0017675514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010809689,0.00003063569,0.000364914,0.019999538,0.0001306535,0.0001669951,0.00067540654,0.00031165575,0.0001394804,0.061920542,0.46685842,0.4492937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008718731,0.000019670255,0.0005901083,0.018284136,0.000055030552,0.00022841201,0.0003727371,0.000046087527,0.000040433628,0.008503789,0.971835,0.000015856416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007416267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0142880175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007416267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035213467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0079928255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025549352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W567409246","doi":"10.5860/choice.40-0365","title":"Sexual violence: policies, practices, and challenges in the United States and Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Law enforcement; Sexual violence; Law; Politics; Sex offense; Sociology; History; Poison control; Political science; Suicide prevention; Sexual abuse; Medicine","score_opus":0.16218591446722658,"score_gpt":0.3561586997174577,"score_spread":0.19397278525023115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W567409246","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31044528,0.14948204,0.00077538943,0.31832,0.0015135078,0.0003055679,0.009412879,0.00018706702,0.20955826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8260424,0.11052212,0.0017233661,0.015279726,0.00015904594,0.00013626527,0.0022937777,0.00007338114,0.043769892],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581146,0.00034636355,0.0001617618,0.00022595702,0.0018087408,0.0016456424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914624,0.00064478803,0.00048409653,0.000106542786,0.003990819,0.0033112327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021113297,0.00029766516,0.000440685,0.004115271,0.013552227,0.008898279,0.0019133386,0.0017121948,0.004995369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066498006,0.0004554424,0.0004745588,0.011796516,0.0045945463,0.0016173105,0.0032790645,0.0019884678,0.00033985003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018006704,0.00023633357,0.2968547,0.0012383441,0.00014656075,0.000848878,0.03185215,0.0022683197,0.0005348989,0.11025467,0.22157383,0.33401135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005006617,0.00005817046,0.4836051,0.002188112,0.000099718716,0.0002503077,0.11475767,0.0015820516,0.0003163219,0.006356804,0.39052117,0.00021436575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99946684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1696537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1696537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3971898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.963084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W569468412","doi":"10.5860/choice.44-1186","title":"The First Amendment in cross-cultural perspective: a comparative legal analysis of the freedom of speech","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Constitution; Assertion; Law; First amendment; Sociology; Political science; Context (archaeology); Constitutional law; Supreme court; History; Politics","score_opus":0.05204581979797503,"score_gpt":0.40317542479617197,"score_spread":0.35112960499819695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W569468412","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25219974,0.030433347,0.004464257,0.012406303,0.00036576905,0.000045801415,0.000091755086,0.000011231808,0.6999819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838832,0.00784417,0.00095819804,0.0009884594,0.00013411047,0.000062224455,0.000052252235,0.000019502195,0.006057959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902344,0.007840543,0.00014786886,0.0003383542,0.0008559785,0.00058286387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870838,0.011094556,0.00049378147,0.0004693456,0.00064691354,0.0002116352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008080625,0.00035026978,0.00046686523,0.007953397,0.0078229625,0.009231181,0.0011265062,0.0026060245,0.00513482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012278664,0.00019402344,0.00042398355,0.007096573,0.026585048,0.011386374,0.0037565557,0.003000913,0.00032559692],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025946392,0.000032623582,0.00087117817,0.00009304458,0.00001537968,0.00029629338,0.10351441,0.00012944057,0.00013839573,0.8788962,0.0013339242,0.014653255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003869747,0.00014901524,0.017596401,0.0022263455,0.00008974379,0.0006208731,0.3720613,0.00087256805,0.001263036,0.30266225,0.30235028,0.00006947095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015503612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020580586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015503612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0087166075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027452204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06324375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W578120660","doi":"10.59962/9780774856003","title":"Judicial Decision Making in Child Sexual Abuse Cases","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child sexual abuse; Index (typography); Criminology; Sexual abuse; Psychology; Child abuse; Law; Political science; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Computer science; Poison control; Medical emergency; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.020677562806436317,"score_gpt":0.22097294913419668,"score_spread":0.20029538632776037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W578120660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044643525,0.014943156,0.0066916444,0.02476567,0.0012740585,0.00024329306,0.00010858171,0.00007322021,0.9072569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7684014,0.011580747,0.0065957294,0.010455002,0.0010164398,0.00025774704,0.00022279382,0.00009014966,0.20138006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897265,0.00417936,0.00038172834,0.0006759576,0.003127745,0.0019087692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988149,0.009255736,0.0003342595,0.00038948038,0.00149175,0.0003796911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011003904,0.00033228763,0.0005566794,0.0017439914,0.0067079766,0.008649643,0.0026467356,0.0052562053,0.00616443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026661836,0.0005424729,0.00048275813,0.0018590336,0.009778874,0.0035146282,0.003634453,0.005275651,0.0014774983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024882114,0.00005885882,0.00070545566,0.00008662841,0.000007119856,0.0016675894,0.010610226,0.0011601247,0.00031141954,0.87747926,0.06614923,0.041739207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006757844,0.000052144038,0.0026448611,0.00093828485,0.000021234286,0.0008592057,0.011554534,0.0021263277,0.0011631491,0.4138803,0.56661886,0.00007353397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03277171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056794565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03277171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008581468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01146983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065161884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W657512810","doi":"","title":"Surveillance : power, problems, and politics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Politics; Political science; Criminalization; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.019083328730072804,"score_gpt":0.25652847463218864,"score_spread":0.23744514590211585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W657512810","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00077690545,0.1371083,0.0019682888,0.6886912,0.015408143,0.0000375305,0.00007563561,0.000073276395,0.15586065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14741766,0.26504487,0.0047184397,0.25850642,0.050272264,0.00031311088,0.0002757195,0.00037257862,0.273079],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98947793,0.0049833916,0.0004381338,0.0009735628,0.0034202237,0.0007068064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983823,0.009652966,0.00081301574,0.0008904978,0.0036598048,0.0011607572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009199173,0.00072737044,0.00071869075,0.002187323,0.006649372,0.017233172,0.0014272933,0.0065460284,0.02144546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021495136,0.0005847686,0.00040835424,0.002204577,0.015835742,0.01769472,0.005132012,0.00828157,0.0058892095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012300631,0.000017799863,0.00036024416,0.00021773698,0.000007179638,0.0000514521,0.0037440467,0.00011080952,0.000059556693,0.21009271,0.70572263,0.07960355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043327686,0.000006896548,0.00031031182,0.0008647495,0.0000020678833,0.000055690147,0.0039860276,0.00006342298,0.00003618847,0.049547758,0.9451116,0.000010978084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01169782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0081133805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02144546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073279906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009350845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07174218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W658463699","doi":"","title":"Rites of Privacy and the Privacy Trade: On the Limits of Protection for the Self by Elizabeth Neill (review)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Privacy protection; Information privacy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.02546002310361884,"score_gpt":0.23027414491516282,"score_spread":0.204814121811544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W658463699","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000045310484,0.97399807,0.000037210448,0.024510836,0.0007106179,0.0000014736046,0.000005709978,0.0000010468113,0.00068966055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00130116,0.98079497,0.00008629216,0.015016088,0.0016174042,0.000008625616,0.00000992136,0.0000035327419,0.0011619573],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976687,0.0011518976,0.00012107854,0.00019549204,0.0007225295,0.00014027646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894509,0.008313159,0.00052594,0.00015147758,0.0011772445,0.00038128463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004551266,0.00089587126,0.0018810405,0.0025016728,0.0016409196,0.005227463,0.0014454536,0.0062687527,0.0029098669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010468647,0.0005727736,0.00051980803,0.004789911,0.0073519833,0.009850442,0.0030296147,0.0062519596,0.0010343962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007263631,0.000032747055,0.00039408097,0.005482168,0.00008297392,0.0001112319,0.0016482626,0.00021778584,0.00009662226,0.057507586,0.73669374,0.1976602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017224544,0.000022756592,0.0010365198,0.010295187,0.00004632284,0.000272858,0.001021468,0.00003853156,0.000044459237,0.015737567,0.97143304,0.00003393453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028521793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06390552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028521793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004111489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00950951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056711555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6888426135","doi":"10.20381/ruor-29229","title":"Truly Equal? An Analysis of Whether Canada’s Political Finance System Fulfills the Egalitarian Model","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Politics; Supreme court; Nomination; Charter; Primary election; General election","score_opus":0.08641073372107427,"score_gpt":0.33848288177713315,"score_spread":0.2520721480560589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6888426135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34977317,0.0021365024,0.0025758704,0.04435827,0.00023084096,0.00017672392,0.0019472297,0.00004209282,0.5987592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98089707,0.00057789276,0.00049054204,0.0020525677,0.00003998549,0.000022053462,0.00025283374,0.00001782279,0.0156492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931237,0.00058175274,0.000092521805,0.00057517557,0.0025405493,0.00308632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99249345,0.0015298679,0.000707599,0.00036149737,0.003787635,0.0011200071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028179607,0.00030157802,0.00066888373,0.002218884,0.012259121,0.011890924,0.0018181534,0.0016584906,0.014422548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015069251,0.00025356075,0.000590378,0.0044355905,0.0064305393,0.0033619408,0.0019470555,0.0027183625,0.00043055485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053110223,0.000040225732,0.026495276,0.00005392488,0.000038354134,0.00017552177,0.0027817076,0.001189629,0.000112386646,0.9354906,0.019968232,0.0136009585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018949814,0.0001349952,0.33678707,0.0008266045,0.0005008443,0.0002612816,0.046704546,0.018637897,0.0010663699,0.2523426,0.3422902,0.00025800985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9877165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99034625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1093161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1093161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12154855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79314756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6902881909","doi":"10.7916/d8-y9y8-hc33","title":"Article by Ralph McGill on Gunnar Myrdal from the Atlanta Constitution; enclosed with May 27, 1939 letter from Howard W. Odum to Frederick P. Keppel","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Atlanta; George (robot)","score_opus":0.015512075455649574,"score_gpt":0.21099762250314966,"score_spread":0.1954855470475001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6902881909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031928543,0.023191726,0.0003620194,0.104091026,0.012995557,0.000082962535,0.0012360268,0.00013530282,0.85471267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014551959,0.0032808282,0.0001326106,0.019905938,0.00093313406,0.000036894267,0.00017984408,0.00006510391,0.96091366],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942183,0.00008827051,0.000019918025,0.00009819959,0.00022084944,0.00015088184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994936,0.00016086231,0.000036588463,0.000043281303,0.00018734783,0.00007839146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005725916,0.00047153715,0.00030324416,0.0006299279,0.0055294195,0.0040133074,0.0004981618,0.003689509,0.09130166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030899914,0.0003653139,0.0002902541,0.0007903117,0.0012995049,0.0011391677,0.00143125,0.0040466012,0.04043589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011373302,0.000004791237,0.00016774854,0.00001618189,0.0000014303289,0.000051769206,0.00019043364,0.000011091113,0.00007897083,0.013785768,0.9815081,0.0041723275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023984405,0.0000027413264,0.00072404376,0.00007265546,0.000001909565,0.00002483954,0.0002011018,0.000015740456,0.00006676689,0.0009351539,0.9979473,0.0000055154064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11797641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2987737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11797641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039009987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034763685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30543447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6949359677","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.14293055","title":"Corymbitodes Buysson 1904","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genus; Checklist; Taxonomy (biology); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.045199369762104376,"score_gpt":0.2668116834176679,"score_spread":0.22161231365556355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6949359677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37450606,0.03578805,0.00904518,0.0012368081,0.002747133,0.00094138976,0.0029417702,0.00067607017,0.5721175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933846,0.0054026498,0.004227304,0.000805598,0.0001672979,0.0001478821,0.0017655264,0.000088158704,0.053549588],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939084,0.000037569258,0.000044550994,0.00019872734,0.00025649287,0.00007180384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995832,0.00008700576,0.00012718185,0.000033468874,0.000107485335,0.00006166585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021491355,0.0008460653,0.0005616977,0.0019776782,0.0021071536,0.0011003657,0.00084729644,0.00094167975,0.013092973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012808065,0.0002811473,0.00019200219,0.0014998213,0.0009022085,0.0013710512,0.0018137429,0.0008771218,0.003215853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054162065,0.00021983981,0.03678128,0.00309503,0.00009536987,0.0060731014,0.0031102847,0.0012438523,0.033307556,0.016061248,0.035560355,0.8639105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017396886,0.0003130445,0.1829679,0.0015194549,0.00008742082,0.016676094,0.0032157104,0.0007901305,0.0053090863,0.0051495917,0.78371906,0.00007853155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020147989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035483085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020147989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001148122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013575895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043800354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6949599065","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.2532501","title":"EmbeddedMultisensorSystems/EMS-SymAHRS v20.0","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Context (archaeology); Table (database); Relation (database)","score_opus":0.0391565191657944,"score_gpt":0.27434664655888197,"score_spread":0.23519012739308756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6949599065","genre_codex":"software","genre_gemma":"software","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":"software","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004091769,0.00069629255,0.27414438,0.0004836239,0.0010045703,0.00043965853,0.08842757,0.55549467,0.075217545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050731074,0.00083439756,0.177377,0.0009659829,0.00026976096,0.00117152,0.31439877,0.19158621,0.2626653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900347,0.000110832756,0.00007156562,0.00016057411,0.0005666071,0.0000868822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986047,0.0002348448,0.0000621184,0.00044261324,0.0005908354,0.000064938555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001672399,0.002363875,0.0009594201,0.0016702866,0.0003948921,0.0017626558,0.0024644225,0.001340145,0.29491642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032035718,0.001128504,0.0008189072,0.0011232258,0.00029928974,0.002328704,0.0020077694,0.0012433028,0.24117492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005095958,0.000089225105,0.00075768033,0.0005358665,0.00009279518,0.00009552302,0.00006905218,0.006164943,0.008844666,0.0036409413,0.80261916,0.17658055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022850237,0.00011996892,0.002466915,0.00016186795,0.000047880574,0.00018376201,0.000035315534,0.047498886,0.032554023,0.0075747203,0.90896225,0.0001658993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037804958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039124945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29491642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007447674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069276046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9865937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6974023734","doi":"10.57912/23766387","title":"Fox News Dodges a Possible Bullet in Recent Dominion Settlement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American University Research Archive","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Voting; Settlement (finance); Supreme court; Presidential election; Presidential system","score_opus":0.05894689675441166,"score_gpt":0.35531551739488587,"score_spread":0.2963686206404742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6974023734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03100035,0.0051835957,0.004519277,0.28020525,0.00851415,0.00009343262,0.00028038037,0.00036385065,0.6698397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2722142,0.0019415478,0.0020543053,0.2546925,0.003987566,0.00012879504,0.0003349092,0.00029132763,0.4643548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99299204,0.0013779129,0.00022097737,0.0012482002,0.002687806,0.0014730933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953117,0.0021779912,0.0003641403,0.0005156406,0.00088939816,0.0007411599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007757846,0.00060377934,0.00037902055,0.0010216901,0.012644901,0.010307021,0.0018925536,0.015684446,0.029705163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018651497,0.0004488009,0.00058022555,0.0007671209,0.008390128,0.008339737,0.0063602156,0.012306819,0.005921016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060435017,0.00005374935,0.0017399343,0.000049641047,0.000013177624,0.0017949706,0.0052175806,0.00009435824,0.00044266233,0.5373614,0.42562267,0.027549524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018290631,0.000035341378,0.0006777542,0.000103669736,0.000008603048,0.0003035827,0.0011905812,0.00014688575,0.00044348283,0.020010313,0.97703904,0.000022462571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03234461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06460869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03234461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007084025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053439224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0993737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981288324","doi":"","title":"Does composition matter? Wage inequality and the demographic and educational structure of the labor force in Gemany","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Educational attainment; Wage inequality; Quarter (Canadian coin); German; Inequality; Panel data; Efficiency wage","score_opus":0.005191960881716531,"score_gpt":0.23178678542489137,"score_spread":0.22659482454317484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981288324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989272,0.00051641214,0.00019639132,0.0011691801,0.000008924197,0.000004490223,0.00016425095,0.0000028195682,0.008665572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987464,0.00017575845,0.000034611927,0.00006014121,0.00001554938,0.0000016929514,0.000102650294,0.0000013390766,0.00086175214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997316,0.00006987189,0.000010635717,0.000041404866,0.00004298586,0.00010350976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993073,0.00021519713,0.0002579621,0.000052172752,0.000043272288,0.00012415543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056081364,0.00008994784,0.00019250005,0.0009789161,0.0007804928,0.0011533299,0.00019724821,0.0002191159,0.004667827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022427656,0.000059617716,0.00007225331,0.0015249257,0.0012044435,0.00091657037,0.001131648,0.00037670936,0.00034333812],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037300645,0.00018753349,0.86299443,0.00007581331,0.000049317237,0.00040507986,0.00917416,0.00066867925,0.00083026954,0.055546142,0.0031513644,0.06654421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014564819,0.000042412586,0.97150457,0.000060597456,0.000011767345,0.00005508849,0.005861187,0.0006246512,0.00021663129,0.017167568,0.004434151,0.000006906084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010557939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021193223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010557939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000667008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002810468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020992994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981656660","doi":"","title":"Eutrofiering av Mjøsa - kartlegging av årsaksforhold og kilder til fosfor i ni delnedbørfelt","year":2021,"lang":"no","type":"report","venue":"Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Quarter (Canadian coin); Population","score_opus":0.08018229420993662,"score_gpt":0.32182337470812544,"score_spread":0.24164108049818883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981656660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32083663,0.017264722,0.011437329,0.027351337,0.004458185,0.0010708391,0.015300114,0.0019056194,0.6003752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3746746,0.012827196,0.020592397,0.0061853766,0.000512831,0.00072202535,0.013837843,0.0014437829,0.569204],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966557,0.0004631845,0.00016620156,0.0005078066,0.0014677262,0.00073943794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975758,0.00028112982,0.00025110663,0.00020511991,0.0009707473,0.00071600574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027144833,0.0010611432,0.0006380897,0.0011712171,0.003435042,0.0043621417,0.0014703542,0.002153452,0.08565235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038581335,0.0005084206,0.0012832865,0.0014469072,0.0012520679,0.002073563,0.0048837783,0.0028373215,0.030826733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020346565,0.0014132201,0.054421112,0.004724309,0.0002615083,0.0015166873,0.012126025,0.0014226803,0.041872945,0.022394858,0.29372978,0.5640823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004706604,0.00054904347,0.055250313,0.000979818,0.000079800186,0.00024698643,0.0071770195,0.00021856838,0.0061225467,0.0021437404,0.92709535,0.000089745125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04625189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104592904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08565235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045151305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009699664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28653568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981731493","doi":"","title":"Exploring Solutions for Sustainable Rural Drinking Water Systems: a study of rural Newfoundland &amp; Labrador drinking water sytems&#13;\\n","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Scope (computer science); Water quality; Water source; Sustainability; Rural area; Water supply","score_opus":0.1018158813661356,"score_gpt":0.29706284065437805,"score_spread":0.19524695928824243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981731493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98981327,0.00012136642,0.000118218064,0.0021954633,0.0000081787075,0.00007748783,0.000060674494,0.0000046999444,0.0076006767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98518014,0.000640766,0.00042672065,0.0013837239,0.000007965621,0.00018448832,0.00008099526,0.0000150682945,0.012080179],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983537,0.00060285756,0.000036075096,0.00013266283,0.0001643033,0.00071031373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976192,0.00088442536,0.000325791,0.00010624461,0.00032626642,0.00073820853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029100329,0.00032613092,0.0003672323,0.0008065777,0.015393718,0.004276066,0.0014941841,0.0011542306,0.005596566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031888841,0.0006834838,0.00027643106,0.001351081,0.005920586,0.0027501555,0.003201217,0.0028439981,0.00040808748],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028078071,0.00064800767,0.01888035,0.000097938195,0.000010042805,0.00076152745,0.96190673,0.0000888149,0.00079918554,0.0022612773,0.0044735563,0.0100444155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030467988,0.000045645727,0.013480306,0.0000344351,0.0000024131277,0.000035427463,0.9795673,0.000064103944,0.000046970075,0.00006711273,0.0066465535,0.000006691234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7533219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9417475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24667811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021023814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01999923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49626166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981775482","doi":"","title":"Extension de bande paramétrique pour les signaux audio de parole et de musique","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Knowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memoria; Digital audio broadcasting; Video recording","score_opus":0.018261000542519504,"score_gpt":0.23566551197628424,"score_spread":0.21740451143376474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981775482","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044609386,0.0011200955,0.93854076,0.0002261858,0.00016041788,0.0001308379,0.0004554461,0.002524822,0.012232061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29805872,0.0013832321,0.66617393,0.00017401825,0.00009845119,0.0003378982,0.001080763,0.0010205054,0.031672444],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927205,0.00015934516,0.000043190408,0.0002143645,0.00025708904,0.000053959546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792755,0.0009138769,0.00016369387,0.0005928472,0.0003483145,0.000053760774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088914216,0.0010943298,0.00051474094,0.0008517336,0.0002896542,0.0012840421,0.0006060122,0.0009956748,0.019227244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004260947,0.000384984,0.00060092,0.0009883172,0.0006570973,0.0016489178,0.00096088275,0.0011505169,0.005371508],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008421996,0.00015101492,0.0017998393,0.00050302455,0.00006339145,0.00018712682,0.00047114116,0.025490047,0.27682573,0.018905286,0.002537049,0.6722242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002130551,0.0016197275,0.02378116,0.00075454527,0.00027347737,0.0029220704,0.0007567137,0.32213005,0.43864182,0.026748143,0.18185969,0.00029961005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022736443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026118897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019227244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043968638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005682736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06432152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981807007","doi":"","title":"Feature Story: New research underway at the U of R into multiple sclerosis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"oURspace (University of Regina)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple sclerosis; Gait; Feature (linguistics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Pattern recognition (psychology)","score_opus":0.07433149907931601,"score_gpt":0.2860693490657368,"score_spread":0.21173784998642076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981807007","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007249581,0.0027555686,0.0002245083,0.8782312,0.06898887,0.000025766298,0.0006549748,0.00021669782,0.048177555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012459932,0.007404373,0.00055705133,0.5992689,0.036431935,0.00010880578,0.0008057155,0.0005604216,0.34240285],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963787,0.001187631,0.000141336,0.00034931223,0.0011660854,0.0007769108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870193,0.00451598,0.00042795474,0.0007582826,0.0030473985,0.0042310026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050955308,0.0008653017,0.00061411917,0.00084326486,0.0075536976,0.011451322,0.0019114282,0.016158292,0.0885008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022808805,0.00032404638,0.000985942,0.0011519596,0.0033922815,0.009014808,0.0046966197,0.019900871,0.031179568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060972066,0.000007778889,0.00007076234,0.000012738223,0.0000010466247,0.000059345024,0.00017540758,0.0000033142098,0.0000152418315,0.0019415545,0.99302,0.004686665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004462644,0.000010706388,0.00029852055,0.000064258486,0.0000019603312,0.00008742872,0.0010518386,0.000014419062,0.000043072334,0.00083579595,0.99757856,0.000009088301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016754214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039308563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0885008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002599993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007214223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29606467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982227592","doi":"","title":"How Canada's housing crisis is fuelling violence on our public-transit systems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.012687473179053015,"score_gpt":0.20080879895978676,"score_spread":0.18812132578073373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982227592","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09231716,0.009035555,0.00040010817,0.48743787,0.0023199874,0.000087211236,0.005289559,0.00023421035,0.40287834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65005004,0.01427846,0.00053664576,0.05032416,0.0005003902,0.00005450533,0.001972415,0.00023706401,0.28204632],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838245,0.00011007139,0.00001598791,0.00004441475,0.00041164245,0.0010354529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998028,0.00008225021,0.00007066461,0.00002546574,0.0007103465,0.0010832502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005029893,0.000271639,0.00022386372,0.00087181287,0.017905166,0.007262245,0.0009894642,0.0022419377,0.03564285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024481914,0.0002517003,0.0003018461,0.0018766052,0.0026049379,0.0015314441,0.0024952376,0.0027340334,0.0022191268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003816108,0.00003861437,0.016870959,0.00012372753,0.000021012296,0.00034410428,0.0050692814,0.00046570293,0.00021849196,0.016021324,0.9184608,0.04232787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024673973,0.000034536293,0.0937795,0.0004091974,0.00003623655,0.000117287345,0.054069083,0.0006780757,0.0002584357,0.0033692918,0.8471515,0.0000722377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99529797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055173006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055173006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12268179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4003101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982724189","doi":"","title":"John C. Weaver, \\nThe Great Land Rush and the Making of \\nthe Modern World, 1650-1900,\\nMontréal &amp;amp; Kingston, McGill-Queen's \\nUniversity Press, 2003, X-497 p., $. 45.00.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Cairn.info","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Making-of; Land use; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.021073882389730743,"score_gpt":0.25762953064576366,"score_spread":0.23655564825603292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982724189","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00072018575,0.6220798,0.00068316713,0.071443036,0.00529782,0.000033224253,0.00093646796,0.00026645986,0.29853982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00952395,0.31381354,0.00077420037,0.009399944,0.0011942103,0.00003760967,0.00038564266,0.00022719322,0.6646437],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996958,0.000046937974,0.000016764876,0.000047621474,0.00014667159,0.000046172736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993586,0.00022868911,0.00005187867,0.000026951107,0.00020817673,0.00012579898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004935318,0.00087319675,0.00031971402,0.0014647418,0.0027246962,0.0031347345,0.0010854614,0.002514735,0.07827551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015612266,0.00047729208,0.00019528496,0.0026303676,0.0015211732,0.0048887404,0.0011119499,0.002471694,0.03208847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000085050715,0.000004614981,0.00009107105,0.00013244305,0.0000020069165,0.000026111711,0.0005282836,0.000027897191,0.000031326614,0.0073047196,0.9607233,0.03111978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020808138,0.0000016259128,0.00050357956,0.0001921376,0.0000015627618,0.00003289664,0.00052155845,0.000012241069,0.00003965002,0.0020021484,0.9966857,0.000004904272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13805114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34618792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13805114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041137314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052610943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27449518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6985979270","doi":"","title":"Airku, Sehatku","year":2018,"lang":"id","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.017615957339921298,"score_gpt":0.2685214961991547,"score_spread":0.25090553885923345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6985979270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018975731,0.009288253,0.0011351352,0.044875152,0.0028104673,0.000025135652,0.0006958019,0.00020092237,0.9219933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3021446,0.0053293947,0.0008863544,0.0069574867,0.0004760904,0.000045210796,0.00032528624,0.00019093978,0.6836446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999603,0.000099866986,0.00001669905,0.00009248677,0.00007794758,0.00011004296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996563,0.00007121411,0.00003651748,0.000045914043,0.00006698783,0.00012316354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048014158,0.00036652683,0.00021588829,0.00055675075,0.004309889,0.0044019073,0.00029333984,0.0017361648,0.08483542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013190516,0.00013563481,0.00017312566,0.0006206409,0.0038182086,0.0042908476,0.0027480274,0.0025068186,0.022166982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007764444,0.000048646467,0.0025250423,0.00017650564,0.000011599496,0.0004651167,0.011866652,0.0000616002,0.000776396,0.6491504,0.24966632,0.08517407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005383348,0.000012924256,0.0018229156,0.00010919125,0.0000040642,0.0002555931,0.0052277935,0.000034870773,0.0003545531,0.021763751,0.97039884,0.000010072604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005665445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0128821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08483542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019679768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014275502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28380275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987466724","doi":"","title":"Subverting Democracy to Save Democracy: Canada’s Extra-Constitutional\\tApproaches to Battling “Fake News”","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misinformation; The Internet; Social media; Politics; Democracy; Referendum; Dictatorship; Analogy; Curiosity","score_opus":0.022060849734674984,"score_gpt":0.253617802586768,"score_spread":0.23155695285209305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987466724","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06659302,0.0074987356,0.0032354924,0.484123,0.0026139696,0.00015915933,0.0006160482,0.00027418404,0.43488637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6818673,0.00581292,0.0032116403,0.08773756,0.0003903308,0.00006854884,0.00025619252,0.0002623176,0.2203932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905952,0.0012530937,0.00015964943,0.00071093376,0.0038171855,0.0034638364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872349,0.0033971004,0.00040831213,0.0007947985,0.004395986,0.0037689214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050367084,0.0005015781,0.0004040697,0.0016013164,0.037807044,0.020258551,0.0020977338,0.0072601135,0.018771375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016706944,0.00046534566,0.00049694575,0.0024277244,0.012464559,0.004946594,0.004492356,0.011679225,0.0013867043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014425121,0.000095175434,0.009053383,0.00025696974,0.000043599888,0.001268249,0.031970903,0.0008193001,0.0011943316,0.45233545,0.40033653,0.10248182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048733727,0.000036838734,0.008984812,0.00032130076,0.00003491472,0.0001770073,0.019263897,0.0010769081,0.0010214067,0.025657553,0.9432382,0.0001383245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9864667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99508375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10716999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10716999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2336946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7775763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987544065","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court and the People: Communicating Decisions to the Public","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Obligation; Meaning (existential); Original meaning; Majority opinion; Democracy; Court of record; Precedent","score_opus":0.029465211045788586,"score_gpt":0.28095859030942383,"score_spread":0.25149337926363524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987544065","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03291873,0.019754859,0.003257985,0.67785394,0.004239078,0.00002632485,0.00006614116,0.00009076103,0.26179218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8514806,0.009909076,0.0011044525,0.10963966,0.0039984183,0.000058915288,0.000047433667,0.00008508684,0.023676326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786605,0.015272521,0.00042399095,0.00088609545,0.002758675,0.0019982634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804125,0.01613026,0.0008168793,0.00043328915,0.0008938112,0.0013133418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011746455,0.00054179336,0.00053519616,0.0016706906,0.020204559,0.029894019,0.0014939031,0.017514333,0.007675431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024619035,0.0005992156,0.00039865193,0.0018364604,0.040340666,0.02295383,0.0097874105,0.016581876,0.0012840978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042548912,0.000054458164,0.0010942555,0.00011781184,0.000021882051,0.0011696378,0.12813023,0.00017917811,0.00032602434,0.7227483,0.118652664,0.027463105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006381448,0.000068117835,0.0013261216,0.00091808673,0.00003210737,0.0004703265,0.10086663,0.0005151414,0.0005569149,0.47848982,0.41659924,0.000093694274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016609993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015717054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029894019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009294329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008608472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067435384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987880320","doi":"","title":"2020 veto package / by Jessica Schaeffer-Helmecki, associate legislative attorney","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"State Elections Enforcement Commission (State of Connecticut)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Legislature; Legislative intent; Legislative history; Power of attorney","score_opus":0.020522572293639407,"score_gpt":0.28449689013881374,"score_spread":0.26397431784517433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987880320","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013705892,0.0004666391,0.002476558,0.018489566,0.005649536,0.0011924715,0.015169904,0.0075302967,0.9476545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035865814,0.00021887271,0.0017853098,0.0138617,0.0011165665,0.0006723853,0.005504412,0.0011790526,0.97207505],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842274,0.000206005,0.000048088936,0.00012682671,0.0008529843,0.00034337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592054,0.0009430052,0.00020697225,0.00026715855,0.0017075952,0.0009547837],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030702965,0.00067174115,0.0004645335,0.0022271494,0.002136088,0.003002748,0.0012282378,0.0036157453,0.5992123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00811566,0.0008340271,0.00047183462,0.00074453605,0.000605087,0.0013320252,0.0016367829,0.0022597269,0.41895354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021024878,0.000027654109,0.00012985006,0.000023383967,6.6171754e-7,0.000014730612,0.000009205337,0.000027478813,0.00009133549,0.0016678008,0.9804983,0.017488565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004370367,0.000023194514,0.0015726782,0.000055369408,0.000001967499,0.000029778908,0.00002928233,0.00018486046,0.00015172918,0.0009888383,0.9969091,0.0000095943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011163642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030965265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5992123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001767797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005157976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.571675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989766556","doi":"","title":"Canadian MP Wants To Criminalize Speech That Endorses Fossil Fuels","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fossil fuel; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Free speech","score_opus":0.04622305251378861,"score_gpt":0.3143730403694947,"score_spread":0.2681499878557061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989766556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010152173,0.0006267631,0.00046686232,0.063391574,0.00096232904,0.00017335298,0.002800354,0.00020587198,0.9212208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034833204,0.0004540864,0.00052918465,0.02870207,0.00018273584,0.00008216206,0.00049403985,0.00007446995,0.93464804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612904,0.00015805413,0.00006695529,0.0002555163,0.0015179398,0.0018723921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99439794,0.00083749625,0.0000990418,0.0001898722,0.00340629,0.0010692505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020737683,0.0009990209,0.0005726702,0.0021180382,0.028931985,0.00700294,0.0026642417,0.018359272,0.072612494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007900188,0.0006320275,0.001206827,0.0017996159,0.0025560486,0.0015763217,0.0025421518,0.008264353,0.009176903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004106461,0.00008691936,0.0034551176,0.000062159714,0.000020788353,0.00050519756,0.0011583491,0.00023759679,0.0005808584,0.13021186,0.8444141,0.019226015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026200278,0.000021126125,0.0070279064,0.0000779222,0.00003225647,0.00013852492,0.0021249517,0.0005405511,0.00074913737,0.004818229,0.98437566,0.00006764345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9892245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99633056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072612494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041785907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14431685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30317944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989897860","doi":"","title":"Community Empowerment and Environmental Ordinances in the United States: A Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"BCU Open Access Repository (Birmingham City University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fordham University; Princeton University; McGill University; Pennsylvania State University; Dartmouth College; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Legislature; Politics; State (computer science); Local government; Commission; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Empowerment","score_opus":0.04745682909368203,"score_gpt":0.32855233257292665,"score_spread":0.2810955034792446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989897860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98500764,0.0010209262,0.00007300169,0.003845184,0.000074273885,0.00006801444,0.00006118518,0.0000029681796,0.009846628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960516,0.0010804083,0.00008837892,0.0013641356,0.00004125289,0.000055297995,0.00007794646,0.0000032598928,0.0012376853],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975714,0.0010537864,0.000070729075,0.00015050583,0.00039556337,0.0007580217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953909,0.0013079174,0.0008182662,0.00015174277,0.00054512307,0.0017860512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030678776,0.00026591192,0.0004059805,0.0020426326,0.008626037,0.0036390217,0.0008476845,0.0013008125,0.0036202471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046624155,0.00037423382,0.00056848215,0.0023526766,0.004251433,0.0032914162,0.006340288,0.0035358474,0.00019199302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021339639,0.006549962,0.4769048,0.00028429824,0.00010139861,0.0012447651,0.40954977,0.00011808572,0.00027811917,0.012037965,0.010808979,0.081908405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037346595,0.00029669263,0.3233067,0.00039103848,0.000042526706,0.00019115777,0.6405348,0.00017808742,0.000084979016,0.0009667078,0.03394247,0.000027407597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.109694384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25782955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109694384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005305115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008640504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21811181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990055664","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Cases (Pt 4) | Police Powers and the Exclusion of Evidence (Panel B)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law enforcement; Constitutional law; Qualified immunity; Constitutional right; Constitutional review; Criminal procedure; Constitution; Scope (computer science)","score_opus":0.08385620175104481,"score_gpt":0.32193783203455756,"score_spread":0.23808163028351276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990055664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076329377,0.004594317,0.0022409894,0.09918615,0.0071236603,0.0015036712,0.0027449622,0.00018073694,0.87479246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.085791916,0.0022149957,0.0022630582,0.10285715,0.0030946445,0.0009697565,0.0011556554,0.000142614,0.8015103],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900205,0.0012032149,0.00040822607,0.0012431814,0.003743388,0.0033815033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99186397,0.0028239905,0.00025945267,0.00044787605,0.0028819635,0.001722822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009209849,0.0006610879,0.00053019484,0.0014220474,0.015052517,0.013272433,0.0027195325,0.017259253,0.06473179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017052205,0.0011211471,0.0013901051,0.00125721,0.0076799174,0.0035979557,0.0057804435,0.011565354,0.009553942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004391369,0.00007175324,0.00070894265,0.00012503537,0.000011478043,0.00069297716,0.0009793345,0.0001814873,0.0010099888,0.19699104,0.7838115,0.015372517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005243852,0.00002888216,0.0025275452,0.00022524392,0.000012316496,0.000091479174,0.00092744036,0.0000983016,0.00068125216,0.014865894,0.9804453,0.00004389206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3883646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57544065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3883646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016594267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04089108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77220815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998527609","doi":"","title":"The Admissibility of Social MediaEvidence in Canada:Part 1","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Social media; Subject (documents); Context (archaeology); Witness; Space (punctuation); Criminal trial","score_opus":0.018754460178777885,"score_gpt":0.22717066385160678,"score_spread":0.2084162036728289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998527609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0621654,0.022102157,0.00398988,0.40755314,0.0020000918,0.0010033885,0.0025567908,0.00010675628,0.4985225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7752779,0.011968317,0.004696261,0.13117598,0.00075474917,0.00063468004,0.0005996521,0.00008716499,0.074805394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94104713,0.008021553,0.0025881631,0.0048670024,0.033429578,0.010046674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88718903,0.047843024,0.0059292563,0.00456958,0.044853494,0.009615568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030847846,0.0006943508,0.0010433577,0.0044284114,0.025356695,0.016811322,0.0049343477,0.012753104,0.009833022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15661885,0.0010653092,0.0010077842,0.0063026915,0.017322069,0.005595489,0.008019126,0.011363772,0.0005991034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019282184,0.00009995046,0.036209542,0.0007138374,0.00016903975,0.0015797502,0.01682015,0.0006144734,0.0003722258,0.635313,0.21520099,0.092714265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037215004,0.00018769591,0.08837951,0.005274945,0.00065385795,0.0014809088,0.019402217,0.0036740964,0.0023726919,0.1147072,0.76306635,0.00042844054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9853232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99149746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13144913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13144913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3395258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9537347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998538146","doi":"","title":"Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Matthew Rodriquez","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; Georgetown University; University of Pittsburgh; York University; George Mason University; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Prosperity; Foundation (evidence); State (computer science); Order (exchange); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.02747216695654588,"score_gpt":0.30052091926680985,"score_spread":0.273048752310264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998538146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04139517,0.004080676,0.00069927645,0.14028126,0.0013892151,0.00015868989,0.0011281966,0.00020800214,0.8106596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3074754,0.0026911788,0.0009894045,0.17562592,0.000860337,0.00034894462,0.0007291144,0.00006757826,0.5112121],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987154,0.00016487543,0.000033035547,0.00011766854,0.00047838586,0.00049078267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987608,0.00054197456,0.00009562705,0.000058550275,0.00027976042,0.00026332188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017252308,0.00031523246,0.00025486326,0.0009329515,0.0075234873,0.0019322159,0.0007381454,0.005335373,0.013569029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035225262,0.00037586762,0.0003208059,0.000753299,0.0010951213,0.0010469018,0.0015792286,0.0045180744,0.00229299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006115379,0.00005767484,0.004691025,0.00006877352,0.000012160834,0.00088286947,0.0009800119,0.0001492264,0.00084720313,0.19099787,0.77507335,0.026178638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005814245,0.000054099557,0.01358364,0.00016893209,0.000022484895,0.00023780341,0.0012747591,0.00023144338,0.00065446954,0.011501309,0.9721628,0.000050033475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12721637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29610103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12721637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004818614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007908088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2529518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000353346","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Expression and the Charter: 1982-2022","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Freedom of expression; Supreme court; Freedom of information; Jurisprudence; Metropolitan area; Expression (computer science); Qualitative analysis","score_opus":0.01613072472650393,"score_gpt":0.2592617879466618,"score_spread":0.2431310632201579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000353346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026379304,0.010378767,0.0011129823,0.053822607,0.0013986884,0.000076862,0.00065047905,0.000045898898,0.9061346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5256801,0.0032024318,0.00071165175,0.016092645,0.00037198616,0.00013258086,0.00040706297,0.000090780006,0.4533108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948565,0.00065421185,0.0001002682,0.0004754389,0.0022070073,0.0017067072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835557,0.0005811386,0.000081744525,0.00013303148,0.0005308431,0.00031761816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033211366,0.0004931707,0.00034606928,0.0015509755,0.021321429,0.01550332,0.0009256476,0.0066162487,0.012235257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008036171,0.00037491514,0.00027153257,0.0029722604,0.026368193,0.006729689,0.0047390717,0.007346487,0.0015868525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026390917,0.000014720828,0.00042486045,0.000035237,0.0000013646447,0.00020661643,0.022163875,0.00010147709,0.00013863095,0.8753215,0.088563874,0.013001418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013779319,0.000011371261,0.00341686,0.00018727749,0.0000030773683,0.000088230074,0.009888144,0.00010966334,0.00022408967,0.033728864,0.9522986,0.00003005208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8540807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91254896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14591932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07621197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05338658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5529591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000475886","doi":"","title":"Free Speech Radio News lineup - Friday, December 02, 2005","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Government (linguistics); Economic shortage; Welfare; Poverty; General election","score_opus":0.00805933295612923,"score_gpt":0.20703312207273367,"score_spread":0.19897378911660443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000475886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016491044,0.0016921369,0.00018349403,0.0030996872,0.006404159,0.0002443389,0.008752738,0.0016736641,0.97630084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024320742,0.00049166224,0.00008408695,0.0009255534,0.0005447577,0.000054269334,0.003112152,0.00015713001,0.9921983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997873,0.000018671954,0.000008051611,0.000029195415,0.00008167117,0.00007510237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995326,0.000053491927,0.000017920082,0.00003446276,0.00019684974,0.00016481389],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040591398,0.0010740013,0.00055297493,0.0009960638,0.0023247788,0.004315196,0.00078647,0.0021541438,0.69918287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00097367686,0.00035610478,0.00033099766,0.0007423561,0.0002488825,0.0011273178,0.0012805954,0.0017714755,0.55789065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052024487,0.000023203414,0.00010736592,0.000053394502,0.0000016111062,0.000040321087,0.000032947108,0.0000110815545,0.00015087488,0.00021956456,0.98389035,0.015417199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019039811,0.000034776822,0.001960448,0.000111675254,0.0000025048025,0.000022601065,0.0001798622,0.0000299564,0.00013329957,0.000061089144,0.9974381,0.0000066288712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011911451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03160957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30081713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011422444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000995735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42907912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014917998","doi":"","title":"Regulatory Reform Should Be About Strengthening Legislative Responsibility","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rulemaking; Deregulation; Regulatory state; Legislature; Lawmaking; Regulatory reform; Separation of powers; Administrative law; White paper; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.04945465674493301,"score_gpt":0.32465309480421095,"score_spread":0.27519843805927796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014917998","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026311763,0.004486596,0.013633072,0.8627395,0.0061363988,0.00013486436,0.00004352389,0.00036070877,0.10983422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1811142,0.0057341214,0.015016427,0.70720685,0.01441222,0.00063395686,0.00014192513,0.0004309145,0.07530947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9214429,0.03668042,0.003115725,0.01158818,0.017178426,0.009994405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92401785,0.0328298,0.0065185046,0.011844577,0.018773234,0.0060160644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07032278,0.0009803011,0.0016327105,0.002422576,0.010037147,0.019255364,0.003423104,0.02152951,0.017677356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.109700345,0.0010755227,0.0018473468,0.0016687687,0.030827472,0.027695518,0.0063862083,0.02734937,0.009153495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022148131,0.00015170066,0.00032777656,0.0001512168,0.00002788775,0.000046474466,0.0024719695,0.00045997524,0.0003369988,0.89295644,0.08293638,0.020110922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070015216,0.00009925624,0.00075592636,0.00047727398,0.00003938423,0.00004970512,0.0012393496,0.00042607237,0.0006346741,0.24299458,0.7531629,0.000050886363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004951429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037543736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07032278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0130434595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0317935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37190688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015568231","doi":"","title":"The Sydney River McDonalds Shooting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crew; Shot (pellet); Griffin; Evening; Falling (accident); Stove; Midnight; Full moon","score_opus":0.007348877163001165,"score_gpt":0.2010355495110448,"score_spread":0.19368667234804363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015568231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027974993,0.0036345564,0.00028483008,0.034774926,0.0045859492,0.00022594185,0.0031393163,0.00043411608,0.92494535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06604021,0.001763277,0.00026064226,0.016227927,0.00058753224,0.00010131709,0.0015323363,0.00023380517,0.91325295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904436,0.00007402928,0.000023910792,0.00010654443,0.00038784964,0.00036323888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999348,0.000044895787,0.000048939353,0.000039887447,0.00020560053,0.00031259042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040454202,0.0006983851,0.00025572613,0.0007627128,0.010466034,0.0028578206,0.0012223417,0.0033215028,0.097250134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002082957,0.00064563204,0.00026890784,0.00070795225,0.001232051,0.001460463,0.003530863,0.005972019,0.01603466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014181813,0.000010141183,0.0008227216,0.00006609862,0.000004679351,0.0010236613,0.0035772584,0.000021230262,0.00009772348,0.0030606012,0.98160076,0.0097009055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073152755,0.00001811586,0.0062822658,0.00018588273,0.000004389632,0.0006265638,0.004814734,0.00002430988,0.00009758809,0.00032860212,0.98759824,0.000012054456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4889789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8179723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4889789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007226832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007292087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9722654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017473874","doi":"","title":"Balancing freedom of the press and the right to privacy : lessons for China","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Right to privacy; Freedom of information; The Right to Privacy; Privilege (computing); China; Autonomy; Balance (ability); Freedom of the press","score_opus":0.014771866703871773,"score_gpt":0.26551831608724696,"score_spread":0.2507464493833752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017473874","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19891748,0.021990165,0.002674634,0.3882418,0.0007786514,0.000109904766,0.00022532528,0.0000552862,0.38700673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9120208,0.010947828,0.0009552604,0.014254013,0.00049867795,0.0000826856,0.00006457432,0.000022686534,0.061153464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774265,0.0006014552,0.00007224855,0.00021133613,0.00037546185,0.0009968603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99622154,0.0014791595,0.0002861533,0.0004529315,0.0005544831,0.00100565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005202809,0.00038409943,0.0007230165,0.0016613766,0.007057347,0.010119004,0.0013041625,0.0037475778,0.008645404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057827216,0.00025354454,0.0006176511,0.0029561822,0.01735564,0.009357379,0.004382613,0.0042405017,0.00036456835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009380737,0.000037196074,0.0055603073,0.000101450365,0.000021969701,0.00032539482,0.006024606,0.0010646838,0.00017338914,0.94220984,0.012157789,0.03222956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011493467,0.0000927758,0.019508675,0.0009236335,0.0000711429,0.000105266794,0.017541451,0.0026785624,0.00078322337,0.7526927,0.2053962,0.00009145066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28037715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27693176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28037715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025250921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046039976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55749035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023509251","doi":"","title":"[Ordered] Liberty and Justice for All? The Elusive \"Right to Privacy\" and a Comparison of American and Canadian Women's Rights Schemes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Bill of rights; Legislature; Normative; Commission","score_opus":0.01732870486897633,"score_gpt":0.2645570976832335,"score_spread":0.24722839281425715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023509251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082290605,0.0048454017,0.002410329,0.17581211,0.00040520192,0.00007408919,0.0002598729,0.00003394358,0.7338684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9330836,0.00203037,0.00131876,0.015508116,0.0001107392,0.00005693618,0.000059241305,0.00004119712,0.047790937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845952,0.003359017,0.0001973355,0.0008526532,0.0042367387,0.006759193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359834,0.0027494878,0.0002928974,0.00042938773,0.001758174,0.0011716282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070225503,0.00044720116,0.0006580433,0.0027658078,0.03363488,0.018293213,0.002687971,0.0074378713,0.009972166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015573527,0.0003592228,0.0006926143,0.0039192773,0.0651793,0.0055843988,0.0057282313,0.009792223,0.00038838494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000844626,0.0000049083087,0.00025488267,0.000012700638,0.0000025609972,0.000023907993,0.01230298,0.00004889852,0.00004106848,0.9798774,0.0041823247,0.0032399276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059170674,0.000034227494,0.01136437,0.0006174464,0.000083501334,0.00015607916,0.11370057,0.00057679537,0.00037891482,0.44619715,0.4266769,0.00015502133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97347677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98232526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08389779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08389779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1696049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60872394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023644703","doi":"","title":"Patrick: Protecting Canadians' Privacy Interest in Garbage; 'A Step Too Far' for the Supreme Court","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Abandonment (legal); Government (linguistics); The Right to Privacy; State (computer science); Action (physics); Obligation; Duty","score_opus":0.03569058013775789,"score_gpt":0.27871528192269474,"score_spread":0.24302470178493685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023644703","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030921025,0.010442954,0.0013696678,0.6052683,0.002439282,0.000113535425,0.00051052484,0.00015565111,0.34877902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37915093,0.004665126,0.0015720471,0.4225763,0.0007849352,0.00010610513,0.00012918653,0.00011443055,0.1909009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99243355,0.0007828746,0.00010220965,0.00085809885,0.0029321003,0.0028911137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995968,0.0013533934,0.00015677605,0.00012942878,0.0017427871,0.0006496601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038245795,0.00063823874,0.00053150055,0.00079078967,0.046645332,0.014631316,0.0030390832,0.019596653,0.007135563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011239144,0.00056430156,0.0007495925,0.0016385885,0.013175967,0.003982162,0.003230405,0.015533152,0.00071247894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038891994,0.00001658202,0.0012018237,0.000077978846,0.00001017863,0.0010393115,0.017302025,0.00017409118,0.00042248415,0.5577295,0.4132645,0.008722746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003482063,0.000034842356,0.004657521,0.00046322914,0.000056031142,0.00036152283,0.029778779,0.0005298114,0.0009082475,0.0322405,0.93066835,0.00026639347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9648404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97772676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046645332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03963433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09371284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28756857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023826727","doi":"","title":"Petitioner's Observations (February 2007) for the Redress of Violations of Human Rights Guaranteed by The American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Redress; Commission; Prison; Abortion; Government (linguistics); Declaration; Freedom of expression","score_opus":0.04350640219339257,"score_gpt":0.30343087801083113,"score_spread":0.25992447581743855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023826727","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017258361,0.0070829983,0.00083563436,0.64436233,0.029042237,0.00043301252,0.0036717998,0.000621735,0.29669192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045247346,0.0022708836,0.0007354594,0.28758603,0.002603047,0.00027270816,0.0007942639,0.00019001712,0.6603002],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980233,0.00018313614,0.00008262311,0.00025414515,0.0007978145,0.00065909495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986681,0.00031789337,0.000092171525,0.000070185226,0.00053616555,0.00031554737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016852836,0.0007489142,0.0003952237,0.00094044826,0.014471683,0.0046807183,0.0016500321,0.015490174,0.01881179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00494773,0.00068582006,0.0005575874,0.000777506,0.0019258865,0.0017981336,0.001574463,0.024199557,0.0068176268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001938968,0.000030202129,0.000464509,0.000016571197,0.0000025829593,0.00029197143,0.00054530724,0.00003129206,0.000139769,0.0030124262,0.9929246,0.0025215244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015907579,0.00002692212,0.0055688363,0.000091387315,0.000007788446,0.00015997347,0.0020600471,0.0000928873,0.00054194406,0.00073620706,0.99065673,0.000041355983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31006807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5747335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31006807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006405772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008575332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61652654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028717854","doi":"","title":"The following is a commentary from Dawn Vanzant from Investorideas.com - How does an Aquarium Influence Vancouver's Upcoming Election?…It's a Whale of a Tale","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Whale; Fishing; Whaling; Indian ocean; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.009431413887930472,"score_gpt":0.25161101079073533,"score_spread":0.24217959690280486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028717854","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011716816,0.007558454,0.00014929495,0.84437865,0.03103932,0.0000339611,0.00033380548,0.00006843302,0.11526637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013395795,0.0032303152,0.00022126795,0.49364546,0.007488104,0.000079668534,0.00017167491,0.00020499469,0.48156273],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967675,0.0008021668,0.000099889505,0.00025750778,0.0013031435,0.00076974166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907768,0.004931185,0.00020576488,0.00015553336,0.0024188643,0.0015117937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027376527,0.00090560014,0.0008851118,0.0012642461,0.025990613,0.010050741,0.0032533463,0.022148583,0.032271307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013945925,0.0005951313,0.00048038102,0.0022024834,0.0057863384,0.0036920742,0.0030982825,0.026629504,0.0072613475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039163488,0.0000026957957,0.000052291143,0.000022450968,0.0000012090171,0.000054957345,0.00069962046,0.000011251254,0.000015556745,0.0027893665,0.9949803,0.0013665075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004049976,0.0000033078402,0.000393827,0.0001404188,0.000004009612,0.000025743839,0.003710514,0.000024116753,0.0000639832,0.000868698,0.99474573,0.000015649654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5012174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81720895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49878258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014580317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020536005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99660003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030573456","doi":"","title":"NH Primary: Easy to Vote and Accurately Counted, Support for First-in-the-Nation Amendment 2/20/2024","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Quarter (Canadian coin); State (computer science); Voting; Contingent vote; State government","score_opus":0.038628929795256,"score_gpt":0.25391768567023193,"score_spread":0.21528875587497592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030573456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052537315,0.0004067126,0.00067737966,0.0888917,0.0027415727,0.00019080222,0.0018769146,0.00038676366,0.8522909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4134872,0.00042524212,0.001906632,0.03443778,0.0020262147,0.00038109193,0.0016014315,0.00020991752,0.5455245],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99439126,0.0012350025,0.0002042895,0.00034100257,0.0026454504,0.0011830357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857794,0.003594716,0.0009615717,0.0009049764,0.00550134,0.0032580253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068036993,0.00023123136,0.00029157847,0.0007430274,0.0055057798,0.005800769,0.000742481,0.0026382515,0.061738607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023943093,0.00037571194,0.00023240679,0.00047845364,0.0022153102,0.0016063919,0.002837914,0.0027082413,0.016262967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007849386,0.00007237382,0.0076696253,0.00006814145,0.0000052879545,0.00040585626,0.002688242,0.000038235157,0.00078800175,0.014928645,0.94837755,0.0248795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008018955,0.00015334504,0.07292961,0.0001430035,0.000015953216,0.00037325884,0.0066943136,0.0001810729,0.0013595812,0.0026830104,0.9153378,0.000048849346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0807618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22526586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0807618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060219774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00975452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20653623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038387253","doi":"","title":"1971 House Bill 5403. An Act Providing That Certain Members Of The West Springfield Police Relief Association, Incorporated May, Upon Pension Or Retirement From The West Springfield Police Department, Be Paid Certain Sums Of Money By Said Association In Lieu Of Death Benefits.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"State Library's electronic repository (State Library of Massachusetts)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Pension; House of Representatives; Legislation; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.017601456060137518,"score_gpt":0.24069523102641968,"score_spread":0.22309377496628216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038387253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001075819,0.000819979,0.00023426098,0.0053650597,0.0008672143,0.00010887573,0.005383457,0.00021042842,0.98593485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004587086,0.0005411396,0.00018648557,0.0035111057,0.0001522697,0.00008866563,0.0017040727,0.00008028175,0.98914903],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998987,0.00007401182,0.000041644522,0.00007560341,0.00056166516,0.00026003487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923086,0.00012487668,0.000047530062,0.000041959374,0.00045026763,0.00010454704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059776276,0.00092024915,0.00029443286,0.0011397614,0.0043504876,0.0024293638,0.0008065408,0.0036663432,0.18283387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028821141,0.000612997,0.0003801231,0.0014674342,0.0009513729,0.0013021816,0.0012466005,0.0035976614,0.13805585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000127521425,0.00001723827,0.00018519849,0.000019664936,0.0000010988532,0.00005641301,0.00011417312,0.0000324495,0.00011545596,0.01949496,0.9707841,0.009166425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000091175025,0.000007315654,0.0020804405,0.000068168556,0.000003013517,0.000030150364,0.00016043271,0.00003591768,0.00012003634,0.0014617131,0.9960156,0.000008027398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21863711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42155486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21863711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053921835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008220063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6116402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043271346","doi":"","title":"Secretaries of State roundtable \"sold out;\" waitlist started","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Press Releases","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ticket; State (computer science); Administration (probate law); Presidential system; Center (category theory); Event (particle physics)","score_opus":0.07261796189458841,"score_gpt":0.28883644821092774,"score_spread":0.21621848631633933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043271346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024976018,0.00062868395,0.00054054405,0.006300981,0.005488206,0.00028018063,0.0061946036,0.0019123862,0.9761568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004660046,0.00014657411,0.00011087622,0.0010259759,0.00024364302,0.000060543003,0.001338241,0.00031557636,0.99209845],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989404,0.00008982445,0.000036246493,0.00012277733,0.00049176783,0.00031902618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816626,0.00014640152,0.00012046889,0.00019658176,0.0008582851,0.0005120648],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093880855,0.00065046956,0.00036382396,0.0008030973,0.004998704,0.0058918423,0.0008863646,0.0016585009,0.5171458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002950142,0.0006578289,0.00037748585,0.0007690551,0.000488772,0.0022083593,0.0019444756,0.0030692588,0.3391065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001574151,0.00000768479,0.000077223056,0.000009380762,5.284875e-7,0.000022549662,0.00004926046,0.0000058255864,0.000060832717,0.0009487038,0.9943157,0.004486649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005118515,0.000008076211,0.00055874436,0.000016840137,9.483194e-7,0.000014380196,0.00013449728,0.000023579349,0.00013030927,0.00012631115,0.99897504,0.0000062915415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033799764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0754552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5171458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002909524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004835946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68873286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043338604","doi":"","title":"SHAPING A MORE EQUITABLE ELECTION SYSTEM: A CANADIAN APPROACH TO SOLVING THE VOTING RIGHTS CRISIS IN AMERICA","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Proportionality (law); First-past-the-post voting; Disapproval voting; Straight-ticket voting; Ranked voting system; Test (biology)","score_opus":0.018730931246733456,"score_gpt":0.26822007842429973,"score_spread":0.2494891471775663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043338604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06540063,0.006896888,0.028776472,0.22081126,0.0018814583,0.00065318757,0.00043897127,0.00032808364,0.67481315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8268576,0.0055152937,0.038880173,0.020006342,0.00027436196,0.0001840862,0.00021018874,0.00018104978,0.10789087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899156,0.0020931014,0.00020043964,0.00087696506,0.0039262176,0.0029876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933808,0.00087303313,0.00018647837,0.00026568884,0.0037223205,0.001571713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008327264,0.00057330425,0.0005741409,0.0050151832,0.03538463,0.012705912,0.0032125346,0.0033989472,0.006221729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015438433,0.00041234997,0.00074351334,0.0049581947,0.016260581,0.0043678945,0.004895089,0.006348609,0.0003964597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024514562,0.000044876317,0.003444633,0.00006558973,0.000015582775,0.00014243531,0.0114424145,0.0022397302,0.00029234303,0.88257957,0.043450557,0.056257673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069804475,0.00005616741,0.013641076,0.00034435498,0.00006346091,0.00012069772,0.029484807,0.0066048224,0.0006416658,0.18548647,0.7632863,0.00020033953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9935076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99727196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2106996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2106996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30190378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91547656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043770351","doi":"","title":"Wall Street's Most Polarizing Stock Was a Top Buy for 7 Billionaires in the Fourth Quarter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stock (firearms); Quarter (Canadian coin); Payment; Stock market","score_opus":0.032683127818258904,"score_gpt":0.29476554230471147,"score_spread":0.2620824144864526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043770351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009272006,0.0015370088,0.00016593371,0.014307179,0.0020740994,0.000037364487,0.0034695247,0.00021026378,0.9689266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008856106,0.00031131034,0.000070567046,0.001536022,0.00016025253,0.00001796367,0.00034738457,0.000060991177,0.98863935],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996432,0.00003589936,0.00000993194,0.000041764735,0.00015880303,0.00011032259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999647,0.000058067213,0.000019939922,0.000022229917,0.00012652951,0.0001262583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003336708,0.0006373343,0.00030752955,0.00076375064,0.0031106598,0.006324656,0.00045409988,0.0032980165,0.1546346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012767694,0.0003091378,0.00028848267,0.0007613429,0.00064244366,0.0017162028,0.0013717095,0.003539539,0.036527768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004561573,0.00003046901,0.00086531835,0.000026951962,0.00000489746,0.000124929,0.00015010193,0.000049635823,0.00028186443,0.05034051,0.9295047,0.01857498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001053886,0.000012340614,0.0021337317,0.000046227484,0.0000032728826,0.000029228946,0.00028254642,0.000068337846,0.0003615327,0.0016894346,0.99535453,0.0000082659035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04713377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13179609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1546346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027694467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030124262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51730424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7046034753","doi":"","title":"Children Behind Bars: A Path to Reducing Pre-Adjudicative Detention in the Juvenile Justice System","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Juvenile delinquency; Juvenile court; Economic Justice; Juvenile; Criminal justice; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.014260452880789639,"score_gpt":0.2639814383731241,"score_spread":0.24972098549233446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7046034753","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07642306,0.010099525,0.0070028016,0.7387351,0.01465119,0.0022667106,0.001378077,0.0014457749,0.14799781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30267447,0.009897402,0.028638506,0.5544331,0.010773831,0.0031110558,0.0018499633,0.00043749704,0.088184215],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926645,0.0015497798,0.00029293375,0.00046744166,0.0018861665,0.0031392323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97843987,0.0023380688,0.0017581246,0.00045136036,0.0024421765,0.014570439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073885466,0.000882968,0.00053042965,0.0021975865,0.005906582,0.0057668285,0.004889355,0.014262526,0.04031517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016521364,0.00053368066,0.001562606,0.0010189504,0.003472634,0.004633904,0.010248495,0.011622494,0.0051951343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016519293,0.0021717201,0.03385278,0.00087067205,0.000084443775,0.0015818094,0.005543496,0.0005699846,0.0012773126,0.045414608,0.7156284,0.1928396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010964333,0.0021216942,0.1454808,0.008408533,0.0002502494,0.0013717349,0.019234078,0.0011878165,0.0012477341,0.014829513,0.8045318,0.00023960057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052111026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15298842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052111026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049517574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04182596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13486773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070490738","doi":"","title":"Policing's Free-Speech Problem at the St. John's Law Faculty Workshop","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Legislation; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.026927441773813683,"score_gpt":0.29501273031777175,"score_spread":0.2680852885439581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070490738","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14355914,0.0020116528,0.0016812187,0.65221584,0.0047226823,0.0001520058,0.00018657705,0.00007952069,0.19539133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7559067,0.0013119987,0.0011118664,0.06362877,0.0018973582,0.00027506624,0.000074953496,0.00019143787,0.17560188],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99114144,0.0035446403,0.00020612702,0.0009341636,0.0016372738,0.002536298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802947,0.012954532,0.000614436,0.0006000801,0.0019510969,0.0035851067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01456584,0.0005954391,0.0009159004,0.0013808458,0.047232885,0.013285516,0.0028036493,0.01853182,0.016903214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034034207,0.0008571808,0.00057429087,0.0013272959,0.010527665,0.005674639,0.0050071166,0.022478329,0.0013160468],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001648674,0.0004569851,0.0040073385,0.00012487701,0.000038381706,0.0012677583,0.061822686,0.0012335479,0.0005811745,0.28189367,0.59254825,0.055860516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023224932,0.00018562801,0.015847124,0.00088218803,0.000089700254,0.00027919398,0.16537671,0.0036925483,0.0027116404,0.15859294,0.65187305,0.0002370015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17617594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38075587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17617594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017739141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02895682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35030097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070899650","doi":"","title":"Republican Leaders in the House and Senate","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Representatives; House of Commons; Work (physics); White (mutation); Congressman; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.030409524731042328,"score_gpt":0.24122942347845458,"score_spread":0.21081989874741225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070899650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02933985,0.0026748488,0.00016078998,0.030624747,0.003188672,0.00004022234,0.0005294759,0.000073827265,0.93336755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0724624,0.0010154645,0.00010718008,0.0040064044,0.00018945808,0.000025866982,0.00015557386,0.000044831213,0.9219927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995994,0.0000613429,0.00000840443,0.000043778502,0.00007463533,0.00021242657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993911,0.00002533192,0.000028865139,0.000023766472,0.00011804779,0.00041287375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004344321,0.00035192995,0.00020233943,0.00031487114,0.009804307,0.0023883237,0.00025705545,0.0008741115,0.13784698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065892504,0.0002785526,0.00013150169,0.0004807672,0.0010112176,0.0011413243,0.002509591,0.0021215808,0.025679685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032130072,0.000034434488,0.003682533,0.00003438661,0.000004750942,0.00024249131,0.0030902105,0.00003166991,0.0005759888,0.027955892,0.9369153,0.027400356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003076015,0.000006849847,0.0049360967,0.000029603998,0.0000013315492,0.000042713426,0.0040556765,0.000009240369,0.00013839072,0.0002886633,0.9904839,0.000004559011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057161223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28743216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13784698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027053864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004440478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4611441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071993780","doi":"","title":"Vermonters Divided on Holiday Greeting; More Likely to Have Real Christmas Tree 12/20/2023","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christmas tree; Tree (set theory); Quarter (Canadian coin); Tree of life (biology)","score_opus":0.03527517633960458,"score_gpt":0.2461058301091589,"score_spread":0.21083065376955432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071993780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64736664,0.0011400379,0.00027374885,0.01185483,0.00056021835,0.00009913349,0.0071386904,0.000118441276,0.33144832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70896006,0.0006186832,0.0002810432,0.004993835,0.00018893414,0.00007408843,0.0020668975,0.000082561404,0.28273395],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924916,0.000110833804,0.000021661943,0.000084719875,0.00019739052,0.00033619936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984232,0.00012546412,0.0004410411,0.000055476405,0.00028792216,0.00066689117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056472287,0.00011666409,0.00015369468,0.0010869555,0.002592333,0.0015854088,0.00028175965,0.00068141165,0.0844493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013053718,0.00012582394,0.00014259873,0.0010073325,0.00042349639,0.00059160235,0.0009678537,0.000905894,0.008613263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036699045,0.00024373425,0.32581636,0.00011697079,0.000036964717,0.000997604,0.006194988,0.00014173742,0.0020906678,0.008418801,0.5385039,0.11707138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033864853,0.00006243639,0.7153865,0.00025525223,0.000013551103,0.00060521637,0.017317107,0.00019089818,0.00051246176,0.0005949186,0.2650012,0.000026612533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.102283284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29790804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102283284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015553967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012099924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.282511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094747997","doi":"","title":"Words Containing Canadian Province &amp; Territory Abbreviations","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons @ Butler University (Butler University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Word (group theory); Word list","score_opus":0.03065416132924436,"score_gpt":0.20171799694101986,"score_spread":0.1710638356117755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094747997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010528724,0.005220765,0.0013441391,0.013843686,0.011298521,0.00015472547,0.039154448,0.0006065614,0.9273243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0316037,0.009597426,0.003898795,0.0072345785,0.0017528338,0.0003211954,0.020946458,0.0019000375,0.922745],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845576,0.000112439695,0.00009687612,0.00016857273,0.00087052543,0.00029575446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947632,0.00051393855,0.00019231201,0.0001564039,0.0040246006,0.000349432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076666597,0.0011163221,0.0007039714,0.006488497,0.008338017,0.0071886266,0.0014320443,0.0013596831,0.21004556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062583378,0.00042881037,0.0003133642,0.013151141,0.0023430956,0.0037813222,0.0014774428,0.0026727417,0.110652134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009228841,0.0000012275971,0.00009078265,0.00009650979,6.48446e-7,0.000022698932,0.00058764557,0.000019697527,0.0000767646,0.028753009,0.9611834,0.009158433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.691003e-7,4.3143052e-7,0.0001459984,0.000050609382,5.3701206e-7,0.000008231648,0.00030131993,0.000007173071,0.000033942135,0.0005643772,0.9988821,0.0000046689556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83551043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8765702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21004556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027518684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04034769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70267236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096285642","doi":"","title":"Campaign Finances: An Introductory Essay","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Constitution; Newspaper; State (computer science); Power (physics); Supreme court; House of Representatives","score_opus":0.035747275318607406,"score_gpt":0.26854937713354554,"score_spread":0.23280210181493813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096285642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007731442,0.3677567,0.0004911702,0.18988721,0.008413573,0.000045426204,0.00083583104,0.00007531423,0.4317215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060654126,0.2370291,0.00068614923,0.046513136,0.013481825,0.00013233304,0.00070538087,0.00014425625,0.64065367],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991523,0.00015538954,0.000023114993,0.00011132918,0.0003555506,0.00020233882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854845,0.00053874956,0.00006543233,0.00005995928,0.0005672173,0.00022016982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012075278,0.001132727,0.0004825681,0.0029575427,0.0042038825,0.0055921013,0.0011145385,0.0042838757,0.034707267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026386695,0.0005657845,0.00039402887,0.0041692266,0.0035835889,0.003398122,0.00084832485,0.003108723,0.006500302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008370456,0.000022151484,0.00030624558,0.00007700537,0.0000049832875,0.000034066088,0.00028507086,0.00008386913,0.000023889323,0.045859445,0.933383,0.019911872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051989705,0.0000034650716,0.0014549787,0.00031233102,0.0000029099292,0.000014306302,0.00020692742,0.000041461768,0.000016419252,0.00462716,0.9933082,0.0000066716007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55471206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6385838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55471206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03413292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016731527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8958207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097314672","doi":"","title":"An Open Letter to the Kimble County Commissioners Court and the Citizens of Kimble","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberian dollar; Taxpayer; State (computer science); Asset (computer security); Residence; Downtown","score_opus":0.019270631456432766,"score_gpt":0.30818252849779,"score_spread":0.2889118970413572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097314672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006817622,0.0027651743,0.0009508755,0.15767987,0.01789749,0.0003509861,0.0011271515,0.00062946446,0.81178147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010658028,0.00031201146,0.00028557496,0.027534626,0.0005803005,0.00005899133,0.00016750408,0.00014107546,0.96026194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851626,0.00015700415,0.00006463576,0.00027264468,0.00057162583,0.00041786718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615437,0.0006253092,0.00015943004,0.0002717327,0.001709312,0.0010798575],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010677741,0.00054610206,0.00051817304,0.00065443496,0.013515724,0.0076764775,0.0010978632,0.007362612,0.32282865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009804006,0.00079257804,0.00043071414,0.00046944187,0.0012565467,0.0030383593,0.0028329378,0.009983137,0.08159906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019138923,0.000010340491,0.00027351614,0.000013071505,0.0000017088474,0.00028219013,0.00021933981,0.000006735947,0.00014264727,0.0040212036,0.9906025,0.004407657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054541715,0.0000052266696,0.00072928454,0.00004645619,0.0000017000941,0.00008292728,0.0007231722,0.00003353407,0.000089028676,0.00035961848,0.99791306,0.000010532639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.093405776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2757704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32282865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052329055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008007951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96590275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100904842","doi":"","title":"Vital Signs: Health Insurance Coverage and Health Care Utilization —","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"National Health Interview Survey; Quarter (Canadian coin); Health insurance; Poverty; Health care; Poverty level; Medical Expenditure Panel Survey; Medical care","score_opus":0.037276005058204865,"score_gpt":0.3262877033292754,"score_spread":0.28901169827107054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100904842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8415714,0.036490366,0.0026334992,0.020257965,0.0010062942,0.00030190352,0.055667102,0.00030362688,0.041767832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98592746,0.0030024839,0.00079233386,0.0009970003,0.00058299745,0.000081567734,0.007165916,0.000011634319,0.0014386134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925,0.00030664066,0.00010389305,0.00007400682,0.00017834973,0.000087115055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99462223,0.0012985084,0.0026925665,0.00015613226,0.0005259461,0.0007046361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009721205,0.00036994566,0.00029323917,0.0018238339,0.0002568663,0.0009120561,0.00058277947,0.0006052877,0.010557201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070818653,0.00011740265,0.00032788768,0.0021391292,0.00047440274,0.00087070547,0.0007328923,0.0011165566,0.0010668976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011613401,0.00018927836,0.95353407,0.000250516,0.00012736897,0.00009711257,0.000058307476,0.00035971668,0.000072849536,0.0007697715,0.019296749,0.025128132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014219222,0.000085194595,0.9918675,0.00017752877,0.000052783227,0.0005237768,0.000077088625,0.0009595006,0.00007266801,0.001058614,0.005096807,0.000014375422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005727894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005535338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010557201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005609949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007112937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03531736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7110555763","doi":"","title":"The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: A Comparative Constitutional Analysis of Whistleblowing Speech, the Government's Managerial Domain, and the Imperatives of Democratic Self-Government","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Doctrine; Public interest; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Praise; Warren Court","score_opus":0.007498316359374868,"score_gpt":0.24803756512005987,"score_spread":0.240539248760685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7110555763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.090528056,0.0115127675,0.0048214113,0.027712947,0.00038741148,0.00007562472,0.00017003737,0.000030694373,0.864761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96301734,0.0022193333,0.0007831208,0.004504156,0.00027262868,0.000104210434,0.000057549038,0.00004484211,0.028996808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873618,0.005318909,0.00023070576,0.0009844622,0.0030796067,0.0030246014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943137,0.0037725167,0.00026346676,0.0003995308,0.00083048816,0.00042039034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008991329,0.00044100484,0.00074948434,0.002648427,0.020527875,0.020282704,0.0023712406,0.0075758607,0.004748669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0098242415,0.0004779486,0.0006670188,0.0025046065,0.048158817,0.007992145,0.0047176997,0.010083973,0.0004158847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052953646,0.0000043982495,0.00005348256,0.0000061392043,0.0000016665273,0.00003272705,0.00246505,0.000050611023,0.0000427046,0.99602073,0.0007104166,0.0006066845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074818345,0.000066536566,0.003815266,0.0005099755,0.0000867036,0.000113757116,0.023378339,0.0012970252,0.000712949,0.7480609,0.2217831,0.00010053747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31975627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38386342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31975627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04497137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029867915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63579017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112587785","doi":"","title":"The Quaestor Quarterly July 2007","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"RIT Scholar Works (Rochester Institute of Technology)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Audit; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Payment","score_opus":0.013888849701712752,"score_gpt":0.269829178969635,"score_spread":0.2559403292679222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112587785","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009971664,0.018930491,0.00034490536,0.061619375,0.008944348,0.00003783959,0.0004108975,0.00014918055,0.90856576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011220077,0.007351096,0.00024554975,0.0078005004,0.0017577359,0.000032305994,0.0002628497,0.000090714544,0.97123915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877685,0.00028473046,0.00008202497,0.00016307294,0.0004948456,0.00019849864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879634,0.00024370749,0.000059040183,0.00017037313,0.0005724988,0.00015807463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001403443,0.0004715754,0.0004021255,0.0010987531,0.005955923,0.0075541623,0.00065535394,0.0029206004,0.2623722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059490753,0.00039070143,0.0002535726,0.0016817253,0.0025039967,0.004088254,0.0030481552,0.0034019658,0.09718969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000823934,0.0000104115,0.00014557163,0.000052156687,0.0000015633692,0.000039783103,0.0006185806,0.000021091382,0.000039836483,0.047024835,0.9266697,0.025368243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.868636e-7,0.00000157448,0.0001364862,0.000059645285,4.888814e-7,0.000013651581,0.00020919871,0.0000052464,0.00001076475,0.0009434097,0.9986174,0.0000013676138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0144861685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03398614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2623722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036787465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005109212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87772244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115033458","doi":"","title":"Balancing State Secrecy and Freedom of Expression in the Context of Security and Intelligence Whistleblowing","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; National security; Judicial review; Scrutiny; Public interest; Judicial deference; Secrecy; Accountability; Statutory law; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.026461704040585468,"score_gpt":0.29655900625853715,"score_spread":0.2700973022179517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115033458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32451227,0.0033443754,0.022927158,0.026649898,0.0002158341,0.00007473474,0.00007552719,0.000038677477,0.62216157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952714,0.0003134229,0.00063520006,0.00039977164,0.0000319674,0.000017281402,0.00000676472,0.000006145899,0.0033179852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834608,0.0070348633,0.0006306985,0.0012802894,0.0032832471,0.0043100007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98644185,0.008376825,0.0011974898,0.0014894413,0.0020460638,0.00044823484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012071651,0.00031004185,0.0008345072,0.0020889281,0.011912136,0.015821323,0.0016935492,0.0051869885,0.0035227037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019444544,0.00060308113,0.00074399664,0.0020491427,0.06439583,0.009484848,0.0076501556,0.0055122613,0.00032079854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071427044,0.0000024774286,0.00016751247,0.00000971014,0.0000019196739,0.00009018101,0.005682181,0.00029168508,0.00007287706,0.99241066,0.00016438455,0.0010992994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033905046,0.000050586634,0.0029505433,0.000314857,0.000044295684,0.0002087972,0.019616328,0.0021885838,0.000999581,0.9202788,0.053222496,0.000091351496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20381624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18795317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20381624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033006668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02934268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4052598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116879856","doi":"10.5287/ora-qa5qazpjr","title":"Democracy, press independence, and constitutional structure: the crisis of journalism and the checking function of the press","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Function (biology); Context (archaeology); Journalism; Constitutional law; Constitution","score_opus":0.023443667901570864,"score_gpt":0.2606367119637655,"score_spread":0.2371930440621946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116879856","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39045304,0.003156921,0.008416743,0.027952245,0.00014472549,0.000041441377,0.000048233156,0.000052823925,0.5697338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972218,0.00020081765,0.00019866496,0.00026424436,0.00005607179,0.0000083071645,0.000006140784,0.000009605633,0.0020342427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904038,0.004992752,0.00041771776,0.00078738976,0.0021931245,0.0012052361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94841796,0.04198483,0.0030457156,0.002919419,0.0024733527,0.0011587762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011904187,0.0002163053,0.0004532905,0.0039898916,0.006925564,0.018775389,0.0011571787,0.0025679376,0.0058766156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03369714,0.00037491784,0.00031559452,0.0032839237,0.057954732,0.012671384,0.005512488,0.0038517355,0.00038899653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032789172,0.000020919768,0.0015846723,0.00002946061,0.000003580579,0.00007216181,0.013314305,0.00012194,0.00017076408,0.977391,0.00045062206,0.0068077077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012512966,0.00010517396,0.019002719,0.00053802074,0.00004201748,0.00034862247,0.050360527,0.0014272822,0.0022191326,0.85644585,0.069318816,0.00006665878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010687343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008201346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018775389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070724725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007475265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062956095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128676484","doi":"10.26180/4657540","title":"Open' justice, the courts and the media","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Principal (computer security); Statutory law; Work (physics); Common law; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.02448905780778422,"score_gpt":0.27693669730251064,"score_spread":0.25244763949472643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128676484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0199513,0.04318972,0.011560058,0.09956053,0.0038354169,0.00006824348,0.000086223255,0.00013252489,0.821616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.711972,0.02164477,0.005104579,0.027819144,0.007616616,0.0001611538,0.00011029244,0.00019848361,0.2253729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99413514,0.0025989134,0.00023554647,0.00049778854,0.001786983,0.00074556994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99037266,0.0072530797,0.0006692091,0.0005075975,0.00070139806,0.00049610116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035116384,0.0003679153,0.00045904596,0.0017439598,0.005952254,0.021481467,0.001275033,0.004712146,0.012137813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00994998,0.00029186605,0.00031716633,0.0015349216,0.020946203,0.012583888,0.005239933,0.0056874733,0.0010810806],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007227305,0.000011738975,0.000113316586,0.000043696768,0.000002331022,0.000065486354,0.0047506527,0.000049240392,0.000052298838,0.97056365,0.01359097,0.010749493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011559922,0.000030272053,0.00064262294,0.00060182594,0.000007687251,0.0002036206,0.007721925,0.00024031254,0.00032726824,0.4462181,0.5439724,0.000022401588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037410744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045193653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021481467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004693977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052000303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04060501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128677994","doi":"10.26180/4657540.v1","title":"Open' justice, the courts and the media","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Principal (computer security); Statutory law; Work (physics); Common law; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.02448905780778422,"score_gpt":0.27693669730251064,"score_spread":0.25244763949472643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128677994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0199513,0.04318972,0.011560058,0.09956053,0.0038354169,0.00006824348,0.000086223255,0.00013252489,0.821616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.711972,0.02164477,0.005104579,0.027819144,0.007616616,0.0001611538,0.00011029244,0.00019848361,0.2253729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99413514,0.0025989134,0.00023554647,0.00049778854,0.001786983,0.00074556994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99037266,0.0072530797,0.0006692091,0.0005075975,0.00070139806,0.00049610116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035116384,0.0003679153,0.00045904596,0.0017439598,0.005952254,0.021481467,0.001275033,0.004712146,0.012137813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00994998,0.00029186605,0.00031716633,0.0015349216,0.020946203,0.012583888,0.005239933,0.0056874733,0.0010810806],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007227305,0.000011738975,0.000113316586,0.000043696768,0.000002331022,0.000065486354,0.0047506527,0.000049240392,0.000052298838,0.97056365,0.01359097,0.010749493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011559922,0.000030272053,0.00064262294,0.00060182594,0.000007687251,0.0002036206,0.007721925,0.00024031254,0.00032726824,0.4462181,0.5439724,0.000022401588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037410744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045193653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021481467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004693977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052000303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04060501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132858015","doi":"10.1146/annurev-polisci-010814-104523&gt","title":"Campaign Finance and American Democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Politics; Democracy; Democratic governance; Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Public finance","score_opus":0.039012018117604894,"score_gpt":0.35264680224796346,"score_spread":0.31363478413035856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132858015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11112495,0.013130047,0.0024981694,0.06266767,0.0003412607,0.000017687335,0.00016939042,0.00003794965,0.8100128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976029,0.0034289064,0.00029426024,0.0041579725,0.0005285588,0.000019597648,0.00007282424,0.00000877889,0.01546006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989943,0.000456522,0.00002314098,0.0001149845,0.0001905075,0.00022050984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978823,0.0011121542,0.00041064245,0.0001206848,0.00022051744,0.00025363787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014206743,0.0001117255,0.00015494587,0.001342151,0.002213555,0.003566589,0.00019036393,0.0014192632,0.008934095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003342351,0.00007205521,0.00012662627,0.0014333936,0.0055104266,0.0020891966,0.0017945307,0.0015860482,0.00047706717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001294324,0.00003952372,0.0043070754,0.000020180196,0.0000038888384,0.00003539128,0.0011046315,0.00021672987,0.000043225347,0.96257454,0.0061950767,0.025446832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020564412,0.000035007746,0.023467569,0.00020971781,0.0000079373285,0.00008158491,0.0022457496,0.0005175088,0.00011726143,0.64968926,0.3235874,0.00002050586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046604597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057607405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008934095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020677329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014982654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029887497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132888747","doi":"","title":"Legal Systems Involvement and Mental Health: The Challenges for Young People Engaged in the Family Law and Criminal Justice Systems","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Law Foundation of British Columbia; UNICEF","keywords":"Mental health; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Mental health law; Criminal law; Welfare; Legal psychology; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.07298430503607135,"score_gpt":0.3567687836838811,"score_spread":0.28378447864780976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132888747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9348831,0.008376869,0.0006389496,0.036501363,0.00034736967,0.00008835741,0.00007898011,0.0000144385685,0.019070586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861822,0.00723233,0.00045387307,0.0034283833,0.00007048739,0.00008318602,0.000038295195,0.000012883691,0.0024982821],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929563,0.0034739093,0.00032898795,0.000349824,0.0007279592,0.0021630854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99445,0.0020151683,0.00087440293,0.00019047958,0.00053783704,0.0019321635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071318946,0.00033509513,0.00080475473,0.001384003,0.021575129,0.014775776,0.0014810708,0.0034292017,0.0030397796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009635513,0.00079117226,0.00068082294,0.0017616835,0.015325074,0.010579968,0.01443453,0.0066107195,0.00041045083],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065578843,0.000046666057,0.019733975,0.00011435229,0.000007898951,0.001361402,0.9630955,0.000024245242,0.000102802536,0.0066676047,0.0012983783,0.0075406805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013181705,0.000017316475,0.005713171,0.0002365177,0.0000042140964,0.00039158366,0.98635614,0.000014466043,0.000029742125,0.0009446396,0.00628317,0.000007646952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06362086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.104139835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06362086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007643461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015481407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12650108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132890913","doi":"","title":"Criminal Then and Now: A Note on Section 156 of the Criminal Code","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Criminal code; Permission; Code (set theory); Criminal law; Penal code","score_opus":0.058335151661670345,"score_gpt":0.3396673510370189,"score_spread":0.28133219937534854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132890913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007127592,0.0054048244,0.0023123722,0.13633925,0.019059837,0.00057355437,0.006169211,0.00040311893,0.8226102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023510007,0.0027668315,0.0032226867,0.095268846,0.0022114883,0.00073759764,0.0015334084,0.00024506586,0.8705041],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681526,0.00030324914,0.00027795692,0.00030232567,0.001692729,0.00060848513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957837,0.0016551266,0.00034087294,0.00028010842,0.0015781327,0.00036206128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002584851,0.0005208555,0.00053590134,0.0013794953,0.005995494,0.004196937,0.00161822,0.010347407,0.045032054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012394227,0.00060539995,0.0006611415,0.0013351548,0.0014631769,0.0024225784,0.0016058291,0.0078126835,0.02529136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020024088,0.000024270035,0.0005380747,0.00006128872,0.0000025178583,0.00018348145,0.0009478277,0.000032763688,0.00036065522,0.034363654,0.9515717,0.011893771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008133402,0.000014471879,0.0031482307,0.0003118787,0.0000054674065,0.00010319005,0.00048399894,0.00005500347,0.00029892937,0.00360606,0.99194056,0.00002409891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1517514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30137232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1517514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047151656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017199796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30173624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135838408","doi":"","title":"‘The Constitution is designed to survive, and remain in force, in extraordinary times’: the Boumediene v. Bush decision","year":2009,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Legislation; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Supreme court","score_opus":0.030294393549856184,"score_gpt":0.2944840660518686,"score_spread":0.2641896725020124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135838408","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060960356,0.009262924,0.0026354191,0.5841269,0.0027217409,0.00004380293,0.00013419287,0.000030665877,0.340084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7747423,0.0015014049,0.0012336684,0.17143248,0.0007173922,0.000087742745,0.000045197852,0.00007628516,0.05016355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941292,0.0023924534,0.00019776895,0.00069386925,0.00092741475,0.0016592235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996635,0.0019128136,0.00024669865,0.00028537202,0.0004646982,0.00045547183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009397223,0.00029366752,0.00053187786,0.0004522432,0.0091676945,0.0072772354,0.0012240479,0.017855829,0.003628361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01616284,0.0005158023,0.0003798402,0.00063769764,0.020793526,0.0072110305,0.0037928568,0.014145974,0.00065186963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030396373,0.000008215592,0.0002737106,0.00001893247,0.0000067648284,0.0000674833,0.004434051,0.00005097386,0.00013660919,0.9593838,0.03256845,0.0030206777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009406553,0.00003043783,0.0017431731,0.00034920181,0.000028449722,0.00017786793,0.0069486257,0.00017778839,0.00068588555,0.36145496,0.6282152,0.000094358074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049356904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0958962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049356904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005182952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008458183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09813923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162000238","doi":"10.82308/50162","title":"The necessity of a broadened, cost-effective, and widely recognized common law invasion of privacy tort in technocentric Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Common law; Privacy laws of the United States; Information privacy; Privacy law; Privacy by Design; Appeal; Legislature; Privacy policy; Personally identifiable information","score_opus":0.011616244235739955,"score_gpt":0.2775418193492786,"score_spread":0.2659255751135386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162000238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26536894,0.00801456,0.022652514,0.26479584,0.0008832784,0.0006784943,0.00054423173,0.0002915375,0.43677053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9055161,0.003502323,0.011248717,0.02633968,0.00013520007,0.00009884179,0.00014733127,0.0000480594,0.05296375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98474437,0.0015189896,0.0003310651,0.0009743865,0.0075414698,0.004889772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98964185,0.0031752575,0.0006803988,0.00087657373,0.0037561771,0.0018697545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073857144,0.00034371347,0.00046815982,0.0017558861,0.020123363,0.01327297,0.002798813,0.004488323,0.0036195817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015153171,0.0004960811,0.00071811397,0.0019861497,0.013820501,0.0034023717,0.005665412,0.0072371303,0.00023600098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003997438,0.00005221544,0.0081673395,0.0000992054,0.000026017235,0.0008216095,0.008355575,0.0018222701,0.0009583331,0.9176918,0.024232976,0.037732806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008219143,0.00017554233,0.060674284,0.0011914938,0.00021699583,0.0013019118,0.037287496,0.009272565,0.00463073,0.14851944,0.73614556,0.0005018546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9825194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9914164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11542463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11542463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33703408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83746827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162034970","doi":"10.82308/46851","title":"Balancing freedom of the press and the right to privacy : lessons for China","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right to privacy; Freedom of information; The Right to Privacy; Privilege (computing); China; Autonomy; Balance (ability); Freedom of the press","score_opus":0.012487501618264632,"score_gpt":0.2889798617158052,"score_spread":0.2764923600975406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162034970","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39276493,0.015111304,0.004455875,0.21462788,0.00043988755,0.00011166391,0.00010986385,0.00004230042,0.37233636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684535,0.006736566,0.00094830035,0.0035245128,0.00015688277,0.00003407459,0.000025637146,0.000008569631,0.020111918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988876,0.00034410253,0.00003113424,0.00010863842,0.00021733248,0.00041127493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842453,0.0007687522,0.00011272016,0.00015036658,0.00021274768,0.00033096317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002758012,0.00027064813,0.0004899678,0.0011071644,0.0059139924,0.0056978916,0.00078710396,0.0020438072,0.0027043638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029702897,0.0001677458,0.00036071384,0.002021601,0.016570248,0.005934784,0.0023142595,0.0025616041,0.00012673522],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002661811,0.000018719717,0.0029018312,0.00006082484,0.000008262538,0.0002956812,0.0075060646,0.0008246174,0.00015282324,0.9684919,0.0029674082,0.016745292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005979295,0.000057969788,0.01125924,0.0004441259,0.000039258524,0.0001164417,0.021865841,0.0035796703,0.0008857239,0.8395425,0.122097865,0.000051595984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2670335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28212672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2670335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023311416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028993448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53095835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W74659616","doi":"10.1177/009885881303900202","title":"Commercial Speech Law and Tobacco Marketing: A Comparative Discussion of the United States and Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Commercial speech; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Tobacco industry; Statement (logic); Political science; First amendment; Legislation; Constitutional amendment; Tobacco control; Supreme court; Medicine; Public health","score_opus":0.01775470523960748,"score_gpt":0.284094942793462,"score_spread":0.2663402375538545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W74659616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08440437,0.08954358,0.00054915657,0.1276189,0.0008466665,0.00008563343,0.0004734247,0.0000309688,0.6964474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8643363,0.04530897,0.0005529301,0.057570275,0.00038922494,0.00010609496,0.00024168655,0.00006476363,0.0314297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877551,0.0019176556,0.00024693698,0.00068358576,0.0044639157,0.004932882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98868316,0.0056319437,0.00047023612,0.00017616441,0.0035247502,0.0015136973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00563026,0.0005274988,0.0009197522,0.007400926,0.03955364,0.021537699,0.0031738863,0.009515166,0.011426798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013770243,0.0005608254,0.0014507021,0.012389681,0.017893245,0.00482159,0.0038874832,0.008917526,0.00039100752],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112868736,0.0001221011,0.005988392,0.000364481,0.000079048055,0.00084939616,0.027065016,0.000453276,0.00035311384,0.8896933,0.04833291,0.026586022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015592968,0.00011705165,0.06546072,0.003057044,0.00035498128,0.00043239386,0.114278406,0.0011789282,0.00069691957,0.043465603,0.7704746,0.0003274377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99598014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20047168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20047168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19603245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9273395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W80513769","doi":"10.15173/mjc.v2i0.226","title":"Protecting Information Rights in the Liberal-Democratic State","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The McMaster Journal of Communication","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; State (computer science); Law and economics; Liberal democracy; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02014968724793871,"score_gpt":0.27744253154815673,"score_spread":0.25729284430021804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W80513769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065817304,0.0036659495,0.029197933,0.11820346,0.00077087333,0.00007481504,0.00007825272,0.000085486936,0.78210586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674463,0.0011780569,0.0027211488,0.01055893,0.00053790107,0.00008115277,0.000017677274,0.000022145305,0.017436633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911726,0.0038226007,0.000300469,0.0006988433,0.002434045,0.0015713855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98705137,0.007727582,0.0011502863,0.0020129343,0.0013015025,0.00075626344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0120640835,0.00027530195,0.00040551464,0.0009869867,0.0059866887,0.01113728,0.0006463798,0.004828885,0.0033585953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018100675,0.00029880705,0.00040138938,0.0010034025,0.03313121,0.009610936,0.0075959708,0.008102589,0.00061107497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031606091,0.0000049015534,0.00005797474,0.000004344404,7.593525e-7,0.000014904246,0.0009160095,0.00008208679,0.000035508194,0.99666923,0.00068393006,0.0015272583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009120211,0.00000796889,0.00014699693,0.000050078525,0.0000024552733,0.00002178217,0.0005747974,0.00024490317,0.00016540081,0.9586946,0.0400734,0.000008448672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038766041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031415303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0120640835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005048127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073617334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063801765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W852665359","doi":"","title":"More than You Wanted to Know: The Failure of Mandated Disclosure, by Omri Ben-Shahar & Carl E. Schneider","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.020293355217299438,"score_gpt":0.2795723012937092,"score_spread":0.2592789460764098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W852665359","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007664505,0.01358636,0.0004689149,0.9634821,0.00089926453,0.000005730802,0.00002904192,0.000015297801,0.013848792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37088788,0.0294624,0.00147658,0.579406,0.004059939,0.000112805654,0.000063894826,0.000087654706,0.014442842],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97938573,0.013764443,0.0008361018,0.0010524462,0.0036020821,0.0013592917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91330177,0.07008216,0.0061193407,0.0033236898,0.0044497396,0.0027232717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038808435,0.00024176906,0.0006130499,0.00046875124,0.0084896535,0.0061015887,0.0021232732,0.014907995,0.0025137712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14038923,0.00049156,0.00049806497,0.0008961287,0.01185892,0.008616428,0.004549836,0.022477679,0.00058296666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015926495,0.00009731038,0.005327153,0.00021648259,0.00006768282,0.0008652807,0.019138837,0.00022647977,0.00018243435,0.26979318,0.5905485,0.11337738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016660884,0.00017387293,0.014557484,0.004548276,0.00016237589,0.0038815357,0.03090703,0.0016604045,0.0014248663,0.30300197,0.63928616,0.00022942145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011692397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022095073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038808435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033376701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011542302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20524108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W938569533","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Baker: A Critical Race Feminist Theory of Disability","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Immigration; Appeal; Supreme court; Poverty; Sociology; Political science; Critical race theory; Law; Duty; Criminology; Gender studies; Racism","score_opus":0.0759723442374994,"score_gpt":0.3736639926635501,"score_spread":0.29769164842605067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W938569533","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013578882,0.05352009,0.0113985855,0.5882469,0.0017650332,0.00009309799,0.00008706534,0.000041552772,0.33126876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7952149,0.028700119,0.006365013,0.117268026,0.001972468,0.0001952317,0.000054237673,0.000094596326,0.050135463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947978,0.0025121262,0.00008137022,0.0003747607,0.0013808085,0.0008530942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99596643,0.0029536323,0.0001697134,0.00011187446,0.0005547922,0.00024353877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008847543,0.00051950564,0.00055628765,0.0038607018,0.014485311,0.010283291,0.0032348558,0.008284517,0.002544385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005618049,0.00026688163,0.00039538706,0.0023545912,0.084436454,0.010237648,0.0053244117,0.011180218,0.0002693497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018942536,0.0000041903236,0.000072934985,0.000030021254,9.840876e-7,0.000068143985,0.012327251,0.00004931979,0.000019725441,0.9758069,0.007447287,0.004171307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009906852,0.000011198936,0.0005313326,0.00095473055,0.00000769773,0.00013271652,0.025759138,0.00033945992,0.0001110069,0.64512706,0.32699353,0.000022138329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42785344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5392449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42785344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03794508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039655123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8507261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W990652426","doi":"","title":"Are Wedding Bells Ringing for Same-Sex Marriages? The Legal Trends and Social Perspectives of Europe, Canada and the United States","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Law Reform","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ringing; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.018016383269850382,"score_gpt":0.2519407985929728,"score_spread":0.23392441532312241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W990652426","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.375953,0.007257047,0.00056585536,0.3839496,0.001299814,0.000020115109,0.00033595436,0.000027870445,0.23059064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608277,0.002801955,0.00023355758,0.020562336,0.00019694904,0.0000072568196,0.000056979832,0.000030350258,0.01528293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953216,0.0010383502,0.00009023041,0.00032557678,0.0009007346,0.0023236533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887623,0.0025353585,0.0013590379,0.00034781266,0.002804786,0.0041906913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005564252,0.00014597514,0.00047576037,0.0015825884,0.026682423,0.010934177,0.0020333515,0.005754665,0.012635689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017670568,0.00041905046,0.00039189775,0.0026797722,0.018089047,0.0053796438,0.0023258962,0.008142855,0.0007016741],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015805155,0.00016978107,0.055383682,0.00007308338,0.000034578552,0.00068045006,0.14005935,0.00014601412,0.0003076856,0.6665332,0.0826321,0.05382198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037055914,0.000051759736,0.08421232,0.0008006337,0.00009309604,0.0003431859,0.5132924,0.00030729678,0.00045594832,0.040355396,0.359917,0.00013393561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8487412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9296826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15125883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0194058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048303418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30429918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}