{"meta":{"query_hash":"54a474e73a36","filters":{"topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms"},"cohort_total":325,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":325,"exported":325,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/54a474e73a36","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Law%2C+Rights%2C+and+Freedoms"},"results":[{"id":"W118201152","doi":"","title":"Balance of Privacy vs. Security: A Historical Perspective of the USA PATRIOT Act","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rutgers computer & technology law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patriot Act; National security; Law; Legislation; Political science; Information privacy; Terrorism; Business; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.010536900195893251,"score_gpt":0.25522731378729446,"score_spread":0.2446904135914012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W118201152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49622265,0.00796644,0.14436655,0.23742364,0.010839559,0.001763929,0.000030510313,0.0007094684,0.10067726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99461985,0.00023096101,0.004194339,0.00019114662,0.00064818986,0.0000017559155,1.0106223e-7,0.000009179555,0.00010451014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983787,0.00016530967,0.00040302402,0.00021398615,0.00045993453,0.00037905012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987327,0.000087142784,0.00043730673,0.00033461986,0.00031695506,0.000091311646],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048800098,0.00013590029,0.00037324408,0.00014715706,0.000639719,0.000029483877,0.0011681702,0.0002999162,0.000073406176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000651875,0.00009636384,0.00023287747,0.00052976084,0.007239563,0.00020737482,0.00017222617,0.0006530353,0.000006429302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026089878,0.00019957084,0.008970431,0.0000055808114,0.00008268068,0.000012670761,0.0074220533,0.000021818772,0.00022579993,0.9751025,0.0029366626,0.00499417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00266897,0.00074287166,0.0009875254,0.00021071751,0.00015744886,0.00038925634,0.00094900915,0.0009864466,0.011423454,0.44189566,0.5389305,0.0006581958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052165263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004193093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53599375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082633185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021835444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1465973039","doi":"10.1089/elj.2012.1128","title":"A Study of Interest Groups and Campaign Finance Reform in the United States and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Political science; Election law; Politics; Interest group; Download; Public administration; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.02988166507463274,"score_gpt":0.29895318967797346,"score_spread":0.2690715246033407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1465973039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99613017,0.00025294372,0.000015019233,0.0011350261,0.000093145085,0.000084508385,0.000008750422,0.000002685454,0.0022777633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975363,0.0014432067,0.000006688436,0.0004456064,0.00044912306,0.0000017912809,0.0000013054436,0.0000039909114,0.00011196863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916637,0.00017933198,0.00017406051,0.000056159508,0.00013013268,0.00029392602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958986,0.00009684809,0.00008781672,0.000048734342,0.000056652727,0.000120102195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050001557,0.00006725427,0.00010616974,0.00008960866,0.0007000923,0.00008074653,0.00006877288,0.000034284425,0.0000024676021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003964015,0.000043539134,0.000009451004,0.00015878348,0.0010182909,0.0001629675,0.000015666934,0.00016307163,9.506505e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000500629,0.000054789878,0.008368445,0.000004588782,0.000009223368,0.0000020970383,0.02850332,5.833778e-7,0.0000010675523,0.9626817,0.00009291486,0.00027625574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023065433,0.0013447435,0.1076472,0.00010239256,0.00008087573,0.0005070349,0.29783258,0.000069922804,0.00006208776,0.28132313,0.30823165,0.00049183634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9502326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9593791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6813586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017478528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001331055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53846145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W147114429","doi":"","title":"The Scope of Tolerance: Studies on the Costs of Free Expression and Freedom of the Press","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incitement; Scope (computer science); Freedom of expression; Table of contents; Free press; Index (typography); Table (database); Political science; Freedom of the press; Expression (computer science); Free speech; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer science; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.02448660563499163,"score_gpt":0.3007121085294625,"score_spread":0.2762255028944709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W147114429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07429586,0.24344689,0.0002880514,0.03476528,0.010895876,0.0027064525,0.00015711339,0.000053225293,0.63339126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4860662,0.15652326,0.00007259185,0.0019362981,0.0024749401,0.0001325632,0.000010263701,0.00004887897,0.352735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753183,0.00091062137,0.00048990146,0.00024304814,0.00056630716,0.00025827944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951464,0.003732283,0.00047298655,0.00043068876,0.00014031514,0.00007732902],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017557446,0.00016131792,0.00058801414,0.00003110422,0.00043665044,0.0000047722456,0.00092228997,0.00072511163,0.00013404843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018014779,0.00006627075,0.000089225476,0.000050933355,0.06756197,0.00002350696,0.0004114351,0.00049426925,8.674576e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001041723,0.000054594348,0.00022156406,0.000054043896,0.00012644891,0.000004832866,0.005018649,0.0000013492329,0.000021360396,0.97083163,0.018926743,0.0046346053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004352839,0.0014893668,0.0012914854,0.0027971964,0.0005483644,0.0000571114,0.0038995217,0.000048547125,0.0024590085,0.7141961,0.2682621,0.00059841556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003130581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028087616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4117703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028770592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032310345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93497556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W147118177","doi":"","title":"25 Years to Freedom: An Interview with Betty Tyson","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women’s Studies Quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; White (mutation); Conviction; Acquittal; Law; Criminology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sociology; Art; History; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03598053947546718,"score_gpt":0.31005712247161143,"score_spread":0.27407658299614424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W147118177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9830859,0.00094660686,0.0033083486,0.0045320415,0.0011782264,0.0006627957,0.000022725446,0.00030986944,0.0059535163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950686,0.00013455201,0.0008637431,0.0010305995,0.00073372567,0.00020600259,0.00000281027,0.000025482148,0.0019344498],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980289,0.000151732,0.00024864843,0.00040390415,0.0004735346,0.0006932974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990659,0.000046254936,0.00007945601,0.0003366657,0.00015002054,0.00032171776],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006767635,0.0001984269,0.0003841773,0.000088115594,0.0005569653,0.000114517454,0.00042056994,0.00006895843,0.00012861547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002410535,0.00015246581,0.000060099126,0.00036608533,0.0034611707,0.0003644953,0.000032074728,0.00011964238,0.00029738643],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003434389,0.00018520118,0.0002408283,0.000027817336,0.00018285183,0.000053571224,0.81210566,0.000008618864,0.000019476878,0.16345091,0.0016700511,0.022020653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019439369,0.007193527,0.0015770555,0.0002245564,0.000060493017,0.0000056147255,0.6631253,0.0000011808343,0.000010321906,0.04311943,0.28193563,0.0008029556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006885199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013371885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2802656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063295296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010611871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484541927","doi":"","title":"The Constitutional and Cultural Underpinnings of Freedom of Expression: Lessons from the United States and Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Freedom of expression; Political science; Normative; Interpretation (philosophy); Expression (computer science); Law; Politics; Fundamental rights; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010323190371069097,"score_gpt":0.2465594596742068,"score_spread":0.2362362693031377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484541927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97433585,0.009242377,0.0039564017,0.011322852,0.00020630052,0.00009848549,0.00005100599,0.0000058649716,0.00078086555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99252504,0.0068147136,0.000024412051,0.00003792975,0.00021261243,7.9253897e-7,0.000009400228,0.0000023441257,0.00037274568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876696,0.00013487488,0.00018379443,0.00007633302,0.00031053976,0.00052746985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919826,0.0003997143,0.00016950436,0.000059906706,0.00013060168,0.00004199362],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006687984,0.00006574329,0.0001008,0.000014348267,0.0011515055,0.00005561977,0.00019148354,0.000037439124,0.000009506037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054626504,0.00003249202,0.000025458145,0.00009280698,0.010371083,0.00009618039,0.000023203369,0.00035403747,7.30689e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014209639,0.00000715417,0.0058344244,7.2596407e-7,0.00003601112,5.247871e-7,0.00082196796,0.000057150904,0.0001619517,0.9911627,0.001731687,0.00017148165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009038902,0.0000648295,0.0032044558,0.0000587257,0.000058420115,0.000038001497,0.06955198,0.00012023235,0.00023884913,0.8572331,0.068372466,0.00015504201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7536918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9179191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1642273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001765961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002772468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99232215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487519162","doi":"","title":"Burning Crosses on Campus: University Hate Speech Codes.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McMaster University; University and College Union","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Dignity; Law; Censorship; Marketplace of ideas; Jurisprudence; Political science; Sociology; First amendment","score_opus":0.01382374773548006,"score_gpt":0.2623641808930041,"score_spread":0.24854043315752405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487519162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48345834,0.0000052366363,0.0017992264,0.0007890772,0.0008158671,0.00008644515,0.000003327546,0.00015702422,0.51288545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90904665,0.000028153212,0.0005778412,0.00014185262,0.00028758924,1.390979e-7,0.0000014150527,0.0000038418452,0.08991249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931014,0.000041825944,0.000055480643,0.00015528634,0.00020867924,0.00022858295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995626,0.00009594026,0.00003432992,0.00013184646,0.00006296782,0.0001122969],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031270995,0.000060476756,0.000082410224,0.000033274515,0.00086360046,0.00008913424,0.0002442227,0.0001008858,0.0018206857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006348702,0.000048961323,0.00004303662,0.00013547108,0.0045613856,0.00018548162,0.00002653376,0.00015394093,0.000275276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007874652,0.000028953218,0.0033103474,0.0000013628277,0.000006312187,0.000022878723,0.0036956125,0.0000019607467,0.00043013255,0.9861723,0.0036130245,0.0027092136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032023893,0.000031615786,0.0008506073,0.000006731686,0.0000100853385,0.0000012123373,0.005318661,0.000027853663,0.0021048952,0.00956052,0.98157316,0.00019442895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003955403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01468626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9779601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000355894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000832065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1489579544","doi":"","title":"Efficacy or Justice? Overturning the Ban","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Military review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Conversation; Sociology; Officer; Economic Justice; Framing (construction); National security; Political science; History","score_opus":0.040781832843185366,"score_gpt":0.3419331614135393,"score_spread":0.3011513285703539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1489579544","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011615329,0.81778586,0.00061899394,0.04981865,0.0060034483,0.002545544,0.000018000332,0.00033595937,0.1112582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15633422,0.7686338,0.0013752095,0.024525087,0.0060806763,0.00010492007,0.000024456342,0.00005221831,0.042869404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987628,0.00024463577,0.00022514726,0.00019185396,0.00028954705,0.00028603332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989319,0.00046288333,0.000040994426,0.0003919592,0.00005262879,0.00011963156],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013620529,0.00010364615,0.00022102412,0.000011476467,0.0009017968,0.000018184299,0.00050188066,0.000064623186,0.0032287883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010479596,0.000051411163,0.00013279544,0.00024356235,0.0032624188,0.00014321174,0.000040583964,0.00028454998,0.00037485358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021280952,0.00011920808,0.00019222459,0.0014366035,0.00004381091,0.000026766178,0.008913333,8.0968545e-7,0.0000587611,0.6109657,0.19352865,0.18469283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010402426,0.00001681244,0.00022793673,0.00037266937,0.00012575729,0.0000033703145,0.00019743205,0.000008169195,0.0000014204569,0.0007513213,0.99808705,0.000104057406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003844342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025411348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8045584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017422542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013526037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99945015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490218139","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1121932","title":"Not Dead, Just Sleeping: Canada's Prohibition on Blasphemous Libel as a Case Study in Obsolete Legislation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.028646187636546326,"score_gpt":0.2772757971765659,"score_spread":0.24862960954001959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490218139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99223816,0.00022515938,0.00097332906,0.0013937085,0.00037587562,0.0005035195,0.0000015703188,0.00003593007,0.004252752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99532324,0.00046921993,0.000012017073,0.00022289387,0.0007004687,0.000013131145,0.0000019287536,0.00001965568,0.0032374335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964466,0.00035839167,0.00036230797,0.00026791848,0.00076914567,0.001795604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992999,0.00008667127,0.0001930619,0.00014456264,0.000115888266,0.00015990928],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015529688,0.00016293283,0.0002058854,0.00012835338,0.0013635128,0.0000648945,0.00021627614,0.00009934724,0.000032964577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001291623,0.00014869231,0.0000667252,0.00035959977,0.0006694907,0.00031640838,0.000015927064,0.0012564032,0.000018022642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045805748,0.0015841045,0.022696314,0.000009149919,0.00024671375,0.013457527,0.07693534,0.0007179434,0.00014640384,0.85196805,0.0009905935,0.030789824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02864191,0.013581567,0.010878609,0.00035907683,0.00054710393,0.062167887,0.521572,0.0018216032,0.00084663765,0.29820448,0.056580395,0.0047987374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5208366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9846326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55376357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035460559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0106957555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493222896","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1150","title":"R. v. Bryan: The Supreme Court and the Electoral Process","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Jurisprudence; Politics; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Deference; Sociology","score_opus":0.03979678197495684,"score_gpt":0.3035857516961738,"score_spread":0.26378896972121696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493222896","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009320742,0.69625825,0.00083826896,0.1397927,0.001649646,0.0063698725,0.000037304355,0.00045453454,0.14527869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75357306,0.23113789,0.000038349874,0.009151901,0.0011131655,0.0001657873,0.000009146574,0.000035532485,0.0047751837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972035,0.00067031314,0.0004100787,0.00034813705,0.000813964,0.0005540016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998555,0.0003242933,0.0001648781,0.0005094818,0.00028391872,0.00016240947],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023559749,0.00022967465,0.00053026405,0.000013708539,0.0022081598,0.000115535,0.0008626542,0.000100916026,0.00054643594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025491967,0.00011246362,0.00020011174,0.00038156135,0.018569576,0.00032538717,0.0000713085,0.00029844354,0.00010205478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018682289,0.000038251106,0.00071269646,0.0003220592,0.000045949266,0.000008969447,0.0031538266,3.8108604e-7,0.0000022033555,0.9548996,0.039865628,0.0009317523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005164569,0.000026156607,0.00009273217,0.0004395546,0.00013024393,0.000033633725,0.000128464,0.000014104091,0.000011334767,0.011352355,0.9870346,0.00022036057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013805641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030975072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.947169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051649153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028766933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493230811","doi":"","title":"Empirical Shortcomings with First Amendment Jurisprudence: A Historical Perspective on the Power of Hate Speech","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persecution; Supreme court; Oppression; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Due Process Clause; Harm; Prejudice (legal term); Humiliation; Racism; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.021073400052362367,"score_gpt":0.28561298214092856,"score_spread":0.2645395820885662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493230811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5688298,0.00047762677,0.00029403897,0.038360346,0.00055470323,0.00093231804,0.000017313096,0.00016848654,0.39036542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97837317,0.00013613926,0.00027124386,0.0012445031,0.0003479011,0.000034796773,9.191503e-7,0.000019853736,0.019571453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976341,0.00018986392,0.00027497896,0.00042860466,0.0009977174,0.00047471348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987349,0.0003250353,0.000101989215,0.00042456778,0.00015055329,0.00026296408],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059782935,0.00019437696,0.00030624075,0.000038170143,0.00084316655,0.00009994785,0.0005503192,0.00014011424,0.004805912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092167626,0.000121648576,0.00014654246,0.0003466969,0.0042434726,0.00021517706,0.000032574728,0.0003541464,0.00030631953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024294623,0.0004096888,0.002897414,0.0000060742173,0.00006649652,0.000052854735,0.024510516,0.000013824859,0.000018422437,0.9379427,0.033546105,0.00029296023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070738915,0.0006665333,0.0011438642,0.00010618054,0.000058928716,0.0000074137643,0.0055355364,0.0000063903153,0.00053083687,0.0176319,0.97317684,0.00042818973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006753451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006633846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93963075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013075984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020434617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1497381870","doi":"","title":"Reaction and resistance : feminism, law, and social change","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Sociology; Gender studies; Resistance (ecology); Heteronormativity; Law; Political science; Human sexuality","score_opus":0.0455998071082363,"score_gpt":0.3032524608231148,"score_spread":0.2576526537148785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497381870","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056550853,0.0002733529,0.0011215871,0.003251546,0.00030012947,0.00016332591,0.0000022720128,0.000095589705,0.93824136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98599696,0.0001462679,0.00022541062,0.00077051227,0.0008180416,0.0000026883995,9.999635e-7,0.0000038067303,0.012035317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946094,0.00002398377,0.00007152368,0.00012242502,0.00014294974,0.0001782032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979883,0.00005321676,0.00002848746,0.00003753899,0.000023695911,0.0000582033],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053587166,0.0000441839,0.000066231965,0.00001740069,0.00064371777,0.00004426251,0.00003782301,0.00008395656,0.000032358927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006859615,0.00003748507,0.000012519587,0.0000602196,0.0034686804,0.00020212718,0.000012004011,0.000042564992,0.0000047481453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000095523,0.0000071246495,0.00028574362,0.0000037295322,0.0000021418984,0.000002003082,0.025356252,6.6648985e-11,0.000082719576,0.9710023,0.0006549024,0.0025935215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002435055,0.000015227442,0.0065437513,0.0000051941756,0.0000090004105,6.877926e-7,0.008485236,3.3077052e-7,0.000114883886,0.050232578,0.93422353,0.0001260873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014701503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04544952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9335686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002630792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010043985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516564762","doi":"","title":"Feminism, Democracy and the Right to Privacy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Feminism; Democracy; Political science; Right to privacy; Sociology; Internet privacy; Gender studies; Law; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.025986246764368406,"score_gpt":0.30944934690038706,"score_spread":0.28346310013601866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516564762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9403003,0.00049780705,0.00016437107,0.03467759,0.00088386604,0.0012258602,0.0005581207,0.00003290823,0.02165917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98865473,0.004970361,0.0021407788,0.002829454,0.0009953966,0.000025802137,0.000010195143,0.000036860398,0.00033640635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99205756,0.00023176399,0.0019395387,0.0018908139,0.0005261754,0.0033541566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98934686,0.0017344094,0.0007184998,0.0012097687,0.00056367886,0.0064267823],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076487255,0.000716455,0.0017471304,0.0007284532,0.0018213014,0.0015709008,0.0030279763,0.0005143917,0.00021257838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004074104,0.00053407095,0.00034081435,0.00058868114,0.09108088,0.0013209631,0.0029487163,0.0010026708,0.000031904696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012102795,0.00014071443,0.0027205516,0.000058518202,0.000036408834,0.000002005992,0.00063437654,0.00011671667,0.000040770676,0.99556,0.000021707534,0.0005472113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018507517,0.0002863422,0.008059079,0.00019733938,0.00014178231,0.000025939407,0.001622582,0.0018689798,0.00086561625,0.9762891,0.00790497,0.00088751374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010294018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012271889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08925958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001106617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00804576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516910803","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1040","title":"Should the Left Hand Get What the Right Hand's Got?: Government Information Sharing, Criminal Investigation, and Privacy Rights","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Law; Right to privacy; Political science; Brother; Variety (cybernetics); Constitutional right; The Right to Privacy; Human rights; Computer science","score_opus":0.038180528517461516,"score_gpt":0.2823492758539923,"score_spread":0.24416874733653077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516910803","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040575325,0.5002842,0.010509219,0.14910544,0.0060815243,0.013704825,0.00009596904,0.0003972693,0.27924624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78643715,0.18150811,0.00034730925,0.02553781,0.0007469023,0.00018850261,0.000051870164,0.000034265388,0.005148076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975997,0.00038242294,0.00046781724,0.00023529094,0.0009630484,0.0003517178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987707,0.00016121486,0.00023819033,0.00049535156,0.00017169339,0.00016285617],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023459618,0.00020364905,0.00027747793,0.000011180907,0.0028566816,0.0013062365,0.0005738267,0.00009424975,0.0006251067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022380792,0.00010087105,0.00010158082,0.00014478677,0.007031591,0.0022284011,0.000083632,0.00021020483,0.000081450904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021171618,0.000012073398,0.00023513511,0.00022452492,0.000022564678,8.5294533e-7,0.009699333,5.416254e-7,0.000003181639,0.97889787,0.0099594565,0.0009423771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018623708,0.000021024189,0.000087385124,0.00084017415,0.00015979815,0.000008860946,0.00040696707,0.000012043013,0.00020845815,0.045608673,0.95228577,0.00017463144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045237184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026662182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9423263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012975832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115037816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517409699","doi":"10.24908/ss.v8i4.4189","title":"In Further Defence of Privacy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Computer security; Information privacy; Computer science; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03582266078957138,"score_gpt":0.2762062404584458,"score_spread":0.2403835796688744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517409699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8945874,0.0009993097,0.0048156395,0.0008511065,0.0010471182,0.0004210908,0.00002004805,0.0001265741,0.09713172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997245,0.00056157325,0.0008988448,0.00015696714,0.00013804913,0.000006408774,9.1972987e-7,0.000008320947,0.0009838897],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989089,0.00013199978,0.00019667322,0.00018906409,0.00025874734,0.0003146091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994674,0.000080799415,0.000094241404,0.00021642956,0.00007936122,0.00006182436],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096637243,0.00008126647,0.00018068762,0.000012039903,0.00011302824,0.000010073963,0.0003351829,0.00010923989,0.0005645422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000710932,0.00007074112,0.00014203439,0.0003075642,0.0044717635,0.00017640405,0.000040186922,0.00009760427,0.00003350062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013723775,0.00012651361,0.46210822,0.000019369147,0.000020571928,0.0000027242888,0.35350496,9.584489e-7,0.00018452619,0.1788232,0.0041254885,0.0010697473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023172754,0.00015099379,0.48901948,0.00007925469,0.00001432393,0.0000018193191,0.055372257,0.000067876026,0.0016648882,0.16363403,0.28648224,0.0011955564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021499502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002434763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2981327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006034409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011914927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517549971","doi":"","title":"Network Neutrality: Justifiable Discrimination, Unjustifiable Discrimination, and the Bright Line Between Them","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Net neutrality; Government (linguistics); The Internet; Competition (biology); Power (physics); Control (management); Neutrality; Law and economics; Line (geometry); Price discrimination; Business; Economics; Internet privacy; Computer security; Law; Political science; Microeconomics; Computer science; Management; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.034565836075997544,"score_gpt":0.28384704638020863,"score_spread":0.24928121030421108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517549971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18293107,0.004759469,0.16470487,0.053913403,0.0065562893,0.0043614833,0.00015648408,0.001232795,0.5813841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638268,0.00023864007,0.00073114503,0.0011681948,0.00427768,0.00003056209,0.00006277632,0.000034459124,0.029629761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684155,0.00040169625,0.0005934506,0.0005077755,0.0007192254,0.0009362871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976509,0.00091988966,0.00022737721,0.0004956265,0.00029010512,0.0004160907],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048511755,0.00026791045,0.00041132662,0.000045438268,0.0029500572,0.00052887644,0.0006205236,0.00023642945,0.0004530594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028778648,0.00018026524,0.00011847861,0.00059821276,0.010583431,0.0008383446,0.000120993784,0.00039071447,0.00013931392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000432614,0.00003607537,0.004561224,0.000029134311,0.000034866152,0.000005402191,0.003929361,0.000041232874,0.0000053208355,0.98142105,0.008362015,0.0015310666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016263872,0.000035117875,0.0054009086,0.00008638237,0.00031141014,0.0000042322126,0.0037586014,0.00006252017,0.0002049396,0.5144352,0.47358847,0.00048583944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073155034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010809858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7808957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013913051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013617649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522148397","doi":"","title":"Shielding the Public Interest: What Canada Can Learn from the United States in the Wake of National Post and Globe & Mail","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Boston College international and comparative law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Freedom of the press; Political science; Confidentiality; Globe; Freedom of information; Privilege (computing); Presumption; Politics","score_opus":0.10035977786571171,"score_gpt":0.32405598520166395,"score_spread":0.22369620733595225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522148397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43708837,0.11143287,0.000054331696,0.43073526,0.0012297524,0.0013363251,0.0007754744,0.000014704225,0.017332923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715102,0.017038759,0.0000070539786,0.010929038,0.00016829527,0.000028163508,0.00007400786,0.0000024081835,0.0002420805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848616,0.0005193817,0.0002464551,0.00011342802,0.0004783517,0.0001561957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983484,0.0011243215,0.0001352286,0.000083444946,0.0002564093,0.000052156574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095272897,0.00009688049,0.0001750625,0.00001963641,0.00041367306,0.00015002606,0.00043181458,0.000030285635,0.00014494767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008777374,0.00004618464,0.000033786142,0.00023982418,0.0018357674,0.00035630935,0.00006858578,0.00017306418,0.0000014411967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006972705,0.000025461655,0.0012045343,0.000011012416,0.0000376095,8.7330943e-7,0.0047767605,6.853637e-7,0.0000016957018,0.98793393,0.0056386907,0.00036177086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001453267,0.000012586108,0.0019344336,0.00033356648,0.0000143218,0.0000055297887,0.0157022,0.000046078334,0.0000058549927,0.0057077915,0.9760154,0.000076900964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21846183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8560935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98222613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000094182884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020550127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7867425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533284965","doi":"10.58948/2331-3528.1769","title":"Facebook Fatalities: Students, Social Networking, and the First Amendment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pace law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Response Biomedical (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Internet privacy; First amendment; Social media; Business; Political science; Law; Computer science; Supreme court","score_opus":0.06487862511180706,"score_gpt":0.3181166496825823,"score_spread":0.25323802457077527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533284965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026661763,0.26912788,0.00060163636,0.013414466,0.0012792641,0.0043844646,0.000013239856,0.00017755237,0.7107349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24039131,0.71940726,0.000118160555,0.017720608,0.0024521565,0.0006760235,0.0000069489247,0.000041129577,0.019186405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862057,0.00030348505,0.00021147654,0.00018086206,0.00038524944,0.0002983324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951977,0.00008821866,0.00012014526,0.00016564757,0.000032453798,0.00007378949],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014883282,0.0001171553,0.00031006368,0.0000054152447,0.0011514504,0.000097234595,0.00038135212,0.000049542523,0.0006148723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015855405,0.0000699832,0.00010889446,0.00008396572,0.007989124,0.000107448315,0.000100601195,0.00009339732,0.00010043921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046568975,0.000019313236,0.00020997308,0.00017415482,0.000030515701,0.0000015078783,0.0208451,5.157508e-9,2.1718177e-8,0.96840173,0.008335654,0.0019773669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032052255,0.000010186731,0.000024174222,0.00040243147,0.00008401368,5.6993406e-7,0.00079959,1.8824099e-7,6.476002e-7,0.014545163,0.9837018,0.00011067726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016381849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028245335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000449611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025664587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99471056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1535423054","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2000v25n3a1171","title":"Conflicting Communication Interests in America: The Case of National Public Radio","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Advertising; Telecommunications; Media studies; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.04894969466197306,"score_gpt":0.3321035278879562,"score_spread":0.28315383322598314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1535423054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82491523,0.0070644077,0.0006400156,0.05117964,0.0001972071,0.00037038786,0.000018807674,0.000013154178,0.11560114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818164,0.001017664,0.00030897066,0.00021481318,0.000054924956,0.0000028421755,0.000005964109,0.0000053836375,0.00020780452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998302,0.0008848252,0.0004345368,0.00004648223,0.00016782046,0.00016436174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981684,0.0004670459,0.0003564866,0.00037204332,0.00045873423,0.00017725548],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019741382,0.000054459084,0.00013207218,0.00019043498,0.0006414985,0.00009572172,0.000969334,0.00005968053,0.00041100377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043264707,0.00004517193,0.000056074216,0.00040077997,0.004197993,0.00043620673,0.000014016296,0.000307608,0.0000058725195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015512596,0.000060890376,0.0063706217,0.000004665592,0.000049454615,0.000036140238,0.097701885,0.00024400822,0.000012833782,0.7886732,0.003496642,0.1033341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010762099,0.00007975238,0.0066038845,0.00024431996,0.000029073335,0.000569288,0.036362138,0.0009609027,0.000025560234,0.040628735,0.91316205,0.00025806174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05518001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4748547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9096654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003337157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012709366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540839831","doi":"","title":"The Once and Future New Brunswick Free Press","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal of New Brunswick Studies / Revue d’études sur le Nouveau-Brunswick","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Newspaper; Monopoly; Concurrence; Art; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.03500968786305314,"score_gpt":0.2788420137893545,"score_spread":0.24383232592630139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540839831","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18384558,0.43926504,0.0009121955,0.30236262,0.05895035,0.0019400114,0.000022798824,0.00022504505,0.012476351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1328999,0.45703757,0.0093509285,0.0031773956,0.11872817,0.000009669773,0.000007810479,0.0005093261,0.27827922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896193,0.0009770533,0.0032879692,0.0013071869,0.0022508434,0.0025576388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875799,0.002811643,0.0034983275,0.0018538873,0.0021534315,0.002102818],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042482754,0.0014858873,0.0027112593,0.00028767445,0.004084506,0.0010198093,0.003918906,0.0013075548,0.00015022073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021037601,0.0011298356,0.0012815321,0.0013096441,0.016000198,0.0025647157,0.0011133223,0.004112052,0.00007468036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003824794,0.0006112449,0.004755856,0.0004109771,0.002107178,0.00032550306,0.063150324,0.000059520644,0.00012909515,0.6967654,0.19722217,0.034080222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004675309,0.0008742802,0.0068899347,0.00074970344,0.00083972624,0.00074522145,0.019101648,0.000050837625,0.00010678054,0.012411019,0.95224774,0.0013078016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07849635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59018636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75502557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007898795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034588214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541019669","doi":"","title":"Big Censorship in the Big House—A Quarter-Century After Turner v. Safley : Muting Movies, Music & Books Behind Bars","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northwestern journal of law and social policy","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Supreme court; Law; Deference; Prison; Quarter (Canadian coin); Sociology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.04263576784232707,"score_gpt":0.28678445054721746,"score_spread":0.2441486827048904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541019669","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880966,0.0010907155,0.000036510362,0.002585813,0.0009801826,0.0001585409,0.000013044723,0.000020556266,0.007018026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98202074,0.00020110756,0.000017587954,0.0035976812,0.013951523,0.0000043266555,0.0000010641402,0.00002580287,0.00018015031],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727994,0.00066084444,0.000537934,0.00014102817,0.00062110415,0.00075914094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990319,0.00015304152,0.000343943,0.00012712287,0.000099607874,0.00024436053],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016579628,0.00020288056,0.0003540904,0.00015109133,0.00078946655,0.00025029603,0.00036505115,0.0002166376,0.000023956512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033945733,0.00013809983,0.00021264203,0.00016076372,0.003025384,0.00047479593,0.000040602252,0.00048624212,0.00000979769],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090752605,0.0002014431,0.071909726,0.000025524332,0.000057583897,0.000066481196,0.6851054,6.1861596e-7,0.000015308427,0.22342366,0.00018856631,0.018914972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034787764,0.00033162278,0.2700137,0.00019914791,0.0002451336,0.00015371032,0.07528046,0.0000010459771,0.00001861725,0.017490137,0.6317677,0.0010199756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008999779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034038994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6315791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012464327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026898805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544484976","doi":"","title":"The Meaning of Equality: Sexual Harassment, Stalking, and Provocation in Canada, Australia, and the United States","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stalking; Harassment; Vision; Provocation test; Criminology; Political science; Meaning (existential); Law; Sexual assault; Gender studies; Psychology; Sociology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.020288409025182096,"score_gpt":0.2861259670294192,"score_spread":0.26583755800423714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544484976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907842,0.0010031101,0.0008765029,0.006840596,0.00005882637,0.00016357863,0.0000019810875,0.0000036733277,0.00026751088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99488914,0.0032217037,0.000011204571,0.000058504083,0.00012297256,0.0000026498162,0.0000017137902,0.0000037131035,0.0016883777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998271,0.00035154124,0.0002261458,0.00008267804,0.00029497128,0.0007736634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994599,0.0002079369,0.00016447448,0.00006138564,0.000060537266,0.0000457701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038832265,0.000062949766,0.00009936879,0.000035517587,0.000600439,0.00008518033,0.00014967484,0.000026559072,0.0000056468916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006421054,0.000035200712,0.000011835581,0.00015089633,0.0017017307,0.00014428042,0.000016150467,0.0004739146,2.3527618e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003171771,0.0000077414325,0.0072346795,0.0000020747336,0.000037379574,2.504458e-7,0.008502939,0.000042227148,0.000013579211,0.9744771,0.00005871061,0.009591586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032568998,0.0002059543,0.0040531904,0.00003730581,0.00007533035,0.00003789689,0.20508674,0.001917617,0.00008581488,0.72938424,0.055573363,0.00028564947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76156247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99409974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24509287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008542944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025147558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62700975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546560973","doi":"","title":"Censorship, Sexuality, and the Possibilities of Legal Reform: Or, Can We \"Queer\" the \"Canadian Charter\"","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Charter; Censorship; Human sexuality; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.028548157280662147,"score_gpt":0.27809700095813367,"score_spread":0.24954884367747152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546560973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26390418,0.00025714122,0.000007667358,0.10726884,0.0002706391,0.00050214736,0.00006242797,0.000053958163,0.627673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.815243,0.00025904409,0.000013678953,0.0009891306,0.00022547822,0.0000065232202,0.000001379505,0.0000048382285,0.1832569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986456,0.00033555547,0.00020088824,0.00015209771,0.00031229598,0.00035357903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929273,0.00016702832,0.00003862586,0.00028038156,0.00005775799,0.00016347243],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012777215,0.00009232868,0.00016091292,0.000026569405,0.0011194192,0.00018432733,0.0003745495,0.00008265618,0.0032415115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041520747,0.000036834623,0.000049697275,0.00015401078,0.015798703,0.00016906364,0.000017244349,0.00011508115,0.000019093079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003174224,0.000007742829,0.00019507283,0.000005337522,0.000013110768,0.0000011989258,0.061147906,1.838807e-7,8.766671e-7,0.93482715,0.0011782408,0.0025914337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010051819,0.00009331014,0.0010993,0.000020567926,0.00003355628,0.000007575347,0.08777244,0.00003289957,0.000075302465,0.15962824,0.74996525,0.00026640817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8382944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9754429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77519894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117910895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044470644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99766964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556840283","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2011v36n1a2252","title":"Interpreting Privacy on Campus: The Freedom of Information and Personal Privacy and Ontario Universities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Privacy laws of the United States; Privacy policy; Information privacy; Political science; Internet privacy; Privacy law; Information privacy law; Personally identifiable information; Public relations; Academic freedom; Sociology; Higher education; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02244158160507998,"score_gpt":0.22813103987382152,"score_spread":0.20568945826874155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556840283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98651075,0.0002387599,0.0002710854,0.000918989,0.00007693964,0.00009644809,0.0000033691194,0.0000020850912,0.011881596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99943125,0.00007114959,0.00029344432,0.00006126968,0.00001801013,3.2710787e-7,9.364881e-7,0.0000016996911,0.00012188147],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994233,0.00016713429,0.00019112942,0.000025795542,0.00010798077,0.00008461107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992063,0.00010624001,0.0002763768,0.00013546387,0.0001546519,0.00012097753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007097693,0.00004126009,0.000077985285,0.000106831256,0.0004719311,0.000047163827,0.00035296852,0.00003543291,0.00005332425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008864329,0.00003126242,0.00002180075,0.00005689734,0.0022899318,0.0005977081,0.000025729158,0.00016126265,6.0055487e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019076999,0.000007590288,0.030089466,0.0000024050555,0.000019730864,7.502845e-7,0.8848011,0.0000016485066,9.735918e-7,0.082265146,0.00016466583,0.0026274684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011744917,0.00058602315,0.23501721,0.00036864923,0.000108165914,0.000031142838,0.58464825,0.00013608584,0.000026221942,0.015684323,0.16198236,0.00023708692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2891669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5795607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30015284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025560134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013249286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84373486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557208259","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Case of R. v. Patrick: Are Privacy Rights Out with the Garbage?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Garbage; Privacy rights; Law; Right to privacy; Computer security; Internet privacy; Political science; Business; Information privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.009075742598843755,"score_gpt":0.24812440252588303,"score_spread":0.23904865992703928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557208259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6710779,0.024248656,0.012237662,0.16450918,0.0017505686,0.0019877034,0.0000252539,0.00014540722,0.124017686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918147,0.00095128,0.000010193046,0.00015177026,0.00060866005,0.00000155491,3.6080866e-7,0.000006991251,0.006454496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970584,0.0002488877,0.00019364298,0.00012755532,0.0004032261,0.0019682911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902844,0.000109192726,0.00023315482,0.00023446821,0.00017943452,0.00021530998],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022961365,0.0001162531,0.000138703,0.00005830433,0.004547055,0.00018441022,0.0006122686,0.000079773265,0.000025074427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005362395,0.000051460604,0.00009460966,0.00024949433,0.002366201,0.00015907343,0.000008588003,0.001070817,0.00001058079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018251398,0.000018547486,0.00035970454,4.6112294e-7,0.00005652197,0.00014191137,0.006342232,0.000004069189,0.0000013330491,0.9854237,0.0011839366,0.0064493604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059866864,0.00038490264,0.0003748847,0.000016263384,0.000084381034,0.0014080475,0.016010458,0.000012304764,0.00001751213,0.7217653,0.25910583,0.00022144166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.090085156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98408216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.893997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010168437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066293566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1576771245","doi":"","title":"Defending the First Amendment from Antidiscrimination Laws","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Marketplace of ideas; Civil liberties; Political science; Law and economics; Voting; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Democracy","score_opus":0.031103195050808757,"score_gpt":0.27919495506796277,"score_spread":0.24809176001715402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1576771245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22093277,0.0002400545,0.12182325,0.042955015,0.0020132856,0.0005591587,0.00001235268,0.00029334714,0.61117077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99681413,0.000088427136,0.00036255593,0.00042735407,0.0003700633,0.0000063402385,0.0000040934087,0.0000038686067,0.0019231489],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993435,0.000027768112,0.00008844884,0.00011793514,0.00025268958,0.00016962492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973935,0.000059281745,0.000032206237,0.00010711896,0.00002136357,0.00004068548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002248824,0.00005015518,0.00005489647,0.000014754373,0.00088637375,0.00010247943,0.0001861843,0.00003819523,0.00047672496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020308362,0.000029428724,0.00004036533,0.0000936696,0.0017654086,0.00016879654,0.000021282971,0.000042455995,0.00013350879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010858096,0.000023021828,0.0004916878,5.907565e-7,0.0000052754276,0.0000010811485,0.016125422,0.000011709955,0.000036727975,0.9817184,0.0009038218,0.00068117015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066459493,0.000033475768,0.0020244736,0.000026173859,0.000037989226,3.7843407e-7,0.02296172,0.00002271749,0.0029335732,0.4359336,0.5351235,0.00023781146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008349699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020384252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77588135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011615348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003743909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99825376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582656234","doi":"","title":"The Government's Increasing Reliance on — And Abuse of — The Deliberative Process Evidentiary Privilege: '[T]he Last Will Be First'","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Doctrine; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.006156941219121719,"score_gpt":0.2355834736430507,"score_spread":0.229426532423929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582656234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98154396,0.0035239416,0.0006575845,0.010354811,0.00033801206,0.00046969304,0.0000030065278,0.000017602864,0.003091368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98291993,0.014002384,0.000012025791,0.00019675025,0.00033563233,0.0000126143805,1.5367003e-7,0.000012820957,0.0025077078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973893,0.00033694156,0.0002495067,0.00016343551,0.0007922283,0.0010685605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893534,0.00036066884,0.00030090005,0.00017366736,0.000147885,0.000081521524],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001983469,0.00012347124,0.00013383084,0.000014288171,0.0020506338,0.00022108323,0.00053924066,0.0000707877,0.000017993156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029485443,0.000064266635,0.00007684444,0.00019695846,0.002798089,0.0006709265,0.000036747108,0.0008370165,0.0000046366476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010264291,0.00013188888,0.015466049,0.000016237298,0.00022356436,0.0000010486788,0.020963062,0.0000323988,0.00016183188,0.9546969,0.0014981496,0.0067062485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019434337,0.00065370183,0.015884383,0.0006289784,0.00019849169,0.00016126728,0.054160003,0.00023567409,0.0010400043,0.8476967,0.076722994,0.0006743539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037131368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012191946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10700016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052546203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081704627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583665215","doi":"","title":"The First Amendment: Cases and Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; First amendment; Political science; Law; Supreme court","score_opus":0.022470765148343928,"score_gpt":0.25056895084796305,"score_spread":0.22809818569961912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583665215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008572508,0.003844853,0.00011632444,0.000832301,0.00045857707,0.00021392123,0.000010040336,0.000065483866,0.9944499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011638697,0.018055325,0.000009350271,0.00037144838,0.00092659245,0.000009167857,0.000004534284,0.000012718232,0.979447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990547,0.00006841475,0.00012969802,0.00019235781,0.00030373907,0.0002510941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840075,0.0012163521,0.000071442286,0.0001873032,0.000036486406,0.000087663306],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039734313,0.0001310983,0.0001507201,0.000021803582,0.002346052,0.00012563953,0.00026915153,0.00018774901,0.00045126493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006782249,0.00007163067,0.000070666894,0.00002841389,0.019948011,0.000068547764,0.00004936725,0.00012964863,0.000101808226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000363493,0.0000043723603,0.000007201318,0.0000031462205,0.000017251172,0.000022041337,0.0025647483,1.2949504e-8,1.2768157e-8,0.7983972,0.1971913,0.0017891089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006043657,0.000016995444,0.0000017806225,0.0000132901105,0.00001552354,0.0000065880267,0.00049676903,1.3868906e-7,6.366042e-7,0.17152537,0.82775104,0.00011142478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024875117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006243375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63055974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009801682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029144072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583961686","doi":"","title":"Bartnicki v. Vopper: Another Media Victory or Ominous Warning of a Potential Change in Supreme Court First Amendment Jurisprudence?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Victory; Political science; First amendment; Politics","score_opus":0.030580313648835882,"score_gpt":0.24316110952310008,"score_spread":0.2125807958742642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583961686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7383132,0.00075405266,0.003652478,0.00536217,0.001513076,0.0018414991,0.00039698818,0.00045592996,0.24771063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923329,0.0002866518,0.0001030271,0.00008719963,0.00023774589,0.0000067846404,0.00003927589,0.000044126453,0.0068622874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969832,0.0002457385,0.00047540903,0.0005952664,0.0007623178,0.00093812303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984026,0.00034783292,0.00022885988,0.00047501677,0.00020546629,0.0003402168],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004876515,0.00039923337,0.00067230035,0.0007707797,0.0006472595,0.00014242367,0.00085482426,0.00026030958,0.00089797116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028825138,0.00038214415,0.0003041406,0.0013739691,0.0038722076,0.001451194,0.0002509004,0.0003372038,0.000059670718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001340731,0.0033366028,0.30331087,0.00016766373,0.00046092327,0.0019755568,0.08916981,0.00020811871,0.0006749249,0.5850197,0.008069735,0.006265333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005322675,0.0005736865,0.004596764,0.0002800911,0.00014971172,0.000041793406,0.018038027,0.00020100512,0.00036844643,0.0005510954,0.9685102,0.0013664709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008390725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009993427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9604405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000516938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035020037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W159713558","doi":"10.29173/alr57","title":"Lights, Judges, Access: How Active Judicial Review of Discretionary Decisions Protects Access to Government Information","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Business; Access to information; Information access; Political science; Internet privacy; Law; Law and economics; Public administration; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.03312850490154444,"score_gpt":0.32043022774911906,"score_spread":0.2873017228475746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W159713558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004991863,0.18188624,0.0035575298,0.28530067,0.0012295096,0.02536369,0.00016042033,0.00012106692,0.50188166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038665533,0.9128726,0.00035982704,0.04336951,0.00048391966,0.0022319693,0.00013047244,0.000029810713,0.0018563749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729156,0.0003094822,0.00062931015,0.0002643501,0.0011526111,0.0003526788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979055,0.0004464727,0.0005003745,0.0004900518,0.00037894686,0.00027863955],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006352819,0.00021172868,0.00061869004,0.000029565283,0.0004462581,0.0002548476,0.001145525,0.000099272525,0.0020234867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019411892,0.00014817968,0.00021046678,0.0006790795,0.0011415984,0.0045204973,0.00032265662,0.0001388027,0.00045020643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008780924,0.000086597924,0.00006263001,0.005090658,0.00005592142,6.975436e-7,0.00070223544,2.1364707e-7,0.0000032924347,0.7374354,0.17324707,0.08330648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011234406,0.00004522624,0.0003031178,0.024243727,0.00009488669,0.000001111192,0.00004389978,9.653778e-7,0.00005377562,0.0038648571,0.9710081,0.00022796153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007063221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050405706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7977611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021604169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018426502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99954885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604042393","doi":"10.1353/sex.2003.0040","title":"Sex without Consent: Rape and Sexual Coercion in America (review)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the History of Sexuality","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual coercion; Coercion (linguistics); Criminology; Psychology; Sexual assault; Political science; Injury prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07634231893190566,"score_gpt":0.3019560891570102,"score_spread":0.22561377022510457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604042393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5637117,0.3437487,0.00096683594,0.024103224,0.010854261,0.0010794224,0.000022932752,0.00004716286,0.055465754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9259039,0.019395905,0.00026760646,0.0022003187,0.0005138587,0.0000019992306,3.5732623e-7,0.000014043766,0.05170197],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804276,0.00072515785,0.00049918273,0.00010229694,0.00047872847,0.00015187028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879456,0.00016794502,0.00066294224,0.00017079912,0.000104389524,0.00009938465],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016991339,0.00008438246,0.00038728263,0.000050845647,0.00011573257,0.0000051009283,0.00029377118,0.000059116195,0.00028349253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028164315,0.00005704475,0.000068714035,0.00011493932,0.006778912,0.00015939758,0.000031021566,0.00022340473,0.0000036529657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012976478,0.001159189,0.051211525,0.00086605357,0.00014228957,0.00003587031,0.18136245,0.000010912198,0.0014052013,0.007951613,0.70839745,0.047327705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069543975,0.0001442819,0.0027555972,0.00026454832,0.00007396956,0.000026008493,0.0036622556,0.000030023948,0.000010252344,0.0008428883,0.9913366,0.0001581582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051087857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031044384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3621922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041979496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020256503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99592406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604518897","doi":"","title":"Beyond the Margin of Litigation: Reforming U.S. Election Administration to Avoid Electoral Meltdown","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential election; Political science; Democracy; Administration (probate law); Politics; Law; Election law; Primary election; Split-ticket voting; General election; Public administration","score_opus":0.008920350884462315,"score_gpt":0.2741506829325709,"score_spread":0.2652303320481086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604518897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85774964,0.0030231362,0.058871754,0.05205628,0.0012415212,0.0008845042,0.0000061666206,0.00012861771,0.026038392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99110156,0.0007458283,0.00014188958,0.00023531813,0.0022912917,0.0000080636855,0.0000038062933,0.0000120295745,0.005460193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741095,0.00020773469,0.00035613493,0.0001549891,0.000534371,0.0013358091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927545,0.000053723743,0.00021585214,0.00013470082,0.00020270144,0.00011755366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002910379,0.000112804904,0.00014376044,0.0000952825,0.0010661293,0.00009696897,0.00033100267,0.0000986509,0.000116225245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102938924,0.00008018263,0.00010835424,0.0004440322,0.0008101772,0.0004972935,0.000013624011,0.00079662405,0.00003119611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054897653,0.000042929216,0.00034150854,0.0000022776844,0.000039253307,4.3504235e-7,0.0028777274,0.000017886803,0.0013871373,0.95917,0.00039894867,0.035667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010084512,0.0015024339,0.00058525434,0.00004624103,0.000105775034,0.00024175024,0.012773692,0.00010184518,0.01772308,0.7723463,0.19304761,0.00051753706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002815303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034207184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19264866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013429616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029961814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.983416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606914710","doi":"","title":"\"I'm Not That Kind of Girl\": White Femininity, the Other and the Legal/Social Sanctioning of Sexualized Violence Against Racialized Women","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Girl; Femininity; White (mutation); Gender studies; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.02699265925914724,"score_gpt":0.28414084329562,"score_spread":0.25714818403647277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606914710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761119,0.00023228003,0.000009788511,0.0026583658,0.00089748116,0.00039644854,0.000052392348,0.000020165053,0.019621197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99580914,0.00025033279,0.00001909631,0.0011518184,0.00043598426,0.00010927235,7.1592393e-7,0.000014477633,0.0022091763],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982184,0.00031197994,0.0002857866,0.00022067691,0.00037448786,0.0005886773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867547,0.00045552413,0.00026764823,0.0002226287,0.00019154939,0.00018718821],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020255286,0.00016429089,0.00047977304,0.000090791655,0.0019115666,0.000085284635,0.00039895903,0.00011109059,0.0001635177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045447086,0.00009925164,0.00006789429,0.00031706694,0.020423397,0.0001490296,0.00007372862,0.00021952672,0.0000029707355],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001324172,0.000018392388,0.0052069635,0.000033740038,0.00032393905,0.0000029187177,0.60197365,0.000001094224,0.00019355105,0.38897932,0.0005231703,0.0026108273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032720196,0.00006819691,0.0023427957,0.00006770252,0.00007212041,0.0000013150577,0.7905483,0.0000054002803,0.00017937493,0.027765686,0.17527199,0.00040509747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007497559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15003395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36121362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019905528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046778726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W161696500","doi":"10.3138/9781442682337-027","title":"The Intersection of Administrative Law with the Anti-Terrorism Bill","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Political science; Discretion; Terrorism; Context (archaeology); National security; Law; Jurisprudence; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.035653931712052764,"score_gpt":0.2562185986998351,"score_spread":0.22056466698778232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W161696500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035109695,0.00014176233,0.0024410365,0.00033062513,0.00018418737,0.00027213138,0.0000072906555,0.000026724609,0.9614865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9584336,0.00008091026,0.00003462563,0.000011330135,0.00004749259,2.0528825e-7,3.7286344e-7,0.0000023838238,0.041389067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941796,0.00012302422,0.000057859754,0.00009292373,0.00018776294,0.00012047049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995071,0.00008528819,0.000114442504,0.00015353084,0.00010290093,0.00003670362],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017428646,0.000053891526,0.0000886975,0.0000028024194,0.00065512094,0.000016617112,0.00033051617,0.0000459518,0.000038523616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003915553,0.000028515216,0.000050218616,0.0000040986265,0.0075146663,0.00014181709,0.00003675471,0.000048562593,4.671615e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016225071,0.000026695308,0.000111999376,0.0000032677856,0.00006608247,0.0000054781403,0.12403354,0.0000022849774,0.00007851901,0.87282526,0.00077433046,0.0019102589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035180975,0.00017486094,0.00030579325,0.00001852512,0.00004697632,0.0000011101242,0.040053897,0.000014887048,0.0005235396,0.000696746,0.9577351,0.00007671161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3273709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51137155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9569608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007739925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057142326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1652582","doi":"10.7164/antibiotics.44.723","title":"How Much Surveillance is Too Much? Some Thoughts on Surveillance, Democracy, and the Political Value of Privacy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Antibiotics","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Internet privacy; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Politics; Business; Democracy; Political science; Public relations; Computer security; Law; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.012445602173918742,"score_gpt":0.269641667919304,"score_spread":0.2571960657453852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1652582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.932367,0.00024619378,0.0007426083,0.06297831,0.00157112,0.00018847572,0.00001913966,0.0000125804345,0.0018745522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940192,0.0011986833,0.0002782958,0.0007056561,0.0028386407,1.0369431e-8,3.7333558e-7,0.000013647144,0.00094549067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976238,0.00067649083,0.00040253703,0.00011855156,0.0007433248,0.00043531833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970195,0.0016367298,0.00046752937,0.00036420402,0.00033299314,0.00017903201],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033939355,0.00015143148,0.000422597,0.000059582642,0.0006389871,0.00014257529,0.00077125354,0.00014734115,0.000008867419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088845973,0.00007237024,0.00015383055,0.00019832296,0.010315136,0.00021944522,0.0000791772,0.0005534885,0.0000034804789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015017194,0.00008079001,0.01276177,0.000013591212,0.00006160271,0.000005998472,0.0034097824,0.0000012877642,0.0009143555,0.9797626,0.0025833817,0.00025463972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004780593,0.00067575806,0.03749055,0.00012119869,0.00017739035,0.00020617142,0.008041459,0.00043132252,0.030678444,0.8734217,0.043348346,0.00062706094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012069728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016486326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10634092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026019587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020320027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99237823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1707063435","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1233","title":"Deprivations of Liberty: The Impact of the Charter on Substantive Criminal Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Charter; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Sovereignty; Substantive due process; Law and economics; Reasonable suspicion; Fundamental rights; State (computer science); Supreme court; Sociology; Politics; Human rights","score_opus":0.061725975899735594,"score_gpt":0.34427046593197164,"score_spread":0.28254449003223603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1707063435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121398315,0.14480554,0.0006788382,0.023014305,0.002344331,0.0057308394,0.00027507043,0.00012560988,0.70162714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911639,0.007237121,0.000015917563,0.0010100061,0.00021484839,0.000015950945,0.000002638633,0.000009118875,0.00033049347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852276,0.0003760032,0.0002944521,0.000107123844,0.0004169303,0.00028275218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887,0.00021092722,0.00021005514,0.00045977728,0.00017583006,0.00007339749],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001051457,0.00011135571,0.00028420758,0.0000095772375,0.00040542273,0.000015794056,0.0004904425,0.00005216173,0.0005754351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009508207,0.000049381342,0.00033848858,0.00024544806,0.0052577006,0.00021957856,0.000040085426,0.000120582095,0.000039138777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036025717,0.00007850377,0.0008868156,0.00010352828,0.00003722968,9.1893426e-8,0.0034743391,2.540881e-7,0.00003709673,0.9919059,0.0030343682,0.00043821472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029291696,0.00012586663,0.0074756043,0.0025814227,0.0005071421,0.0000030347924,0.0004953167,0.0000034958675,0.00088624895,0.017901905,0.9694386,0.0002884084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016409319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009159293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97400403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005148728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093693496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1759440862","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1054","title":"Hierarchies of Harm in Canadian Criminal Law: The Marijuana Trilogy and the Forcible “Correction” of Children","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Law; Supreme court; Criminal law; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Harm principle; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.021034814159474512,"score_gpt":0.2799589661272835,"score_spread":0.258924151967809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1759440862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0382234,0.43090034,0.0004128813,0.07177058,0.0023978602,0.006978104,0.00012950429,0.000070469134,0.44911686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94525343,0.052656066,0.000037646263,0.0015411149,0.00011547861,0.000026350755,0.0000047839603,0.0000074223562,0.00035769242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987198,0.00030523978,0.00032382947,0.00014228608,0.00022271845,0.00028611295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993133,0.0001636753,0.0001139252,0.00023467938,0.000080199345,0.00009419954],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013578039,0.000093490184,0.00035900893,0.000036119767,0.00039527207,0.00002222045,0.00034076427,0.000051799743,0.000115219606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000120174045,0.000051488176,0.000103853745,0.00025760193,0.00938415,0.0001147598,0.000029443927,0.00013619094,0.000003938929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010364715,0.000011926627,0.0003401334,0.00012046314,0.000018221024,6.5741284e-7,0.0024213323,0.0000039515758,9.673191e-7,0.99479765,0.00055641384,0.0017179156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019317359,0.00011227798,0.002021899,0.0019381822,0.00038043878,0.00001853939,0.0008921745,0.000012617702,0.000107163054,0.13595812,0.856337,0.0002898211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83372295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91676223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90703005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009006714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044784896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99331176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1794559","doi":"10.1042/bst019442s","title":"VALUE PLURALISM & NEGATIVE FREEDOM IN CANADIAN EDUCATION: THE TRINITY AND SURREY CASES","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Political science; Politics; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Legal pluralism; Philosophy; Comparative law; Legal realism","score_opus":0.17454146032069748,"score_gpt":0.40027561376183696,"score_spread":0.22573415344113948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1794559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90917146,0.0013500936,0.00020845543,0.04087706,0.0060891,0.00062848517,0.000050055474,0.000024669422,0.04160061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99252886,0.00072091084,0.0033944144,0.0017765157,0.0007070261,0.000028304134,0.0000029386708,0.000010949694,0.0008301062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757403,0.000616233,0.00056542695,0.00027255237,0.00039884477,0.0005728833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997357,0.00056067656,0.00050047884,0.00020319715,0.0007430544,0.00063557515],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038026155,0.00016729227,0.00022905131,0.0005494344,0.003318704,0.00020704484,0.0006864333,0.00012327089,0.00010030257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028253815,0.00013528304,0.000093932256,0.001327697,0.0059531834,0.0010738219,0.00002370047,0.0003028772,0.000009436257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001418813,0.00030833128,0.007445061,0.000020356656,0.000013241628,0.000006673396,0.03454412,0.00088771223,0.000021070518,0.9494421,0.0011586332,0.006138535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009093413,0.00038888492,0.05057595,0.00067326846,0.00011543092,0.0016775002,0.12668785,0.00010778242,0.00036017364,0.44933715,0.36846325,0.00070342136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3175446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46509445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50010496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004021526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010671945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179536926","doi":"","title":"Hate speech, fighting words, and beyond - why American law is unique","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Presidential system; Declaration of independence; Faith; Supreme court; State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; Politics; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02436251169976915,"score_gpt":0.3023062074226997,"score_spread":0.27794369572293054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W179536926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019377258,0.24977955,0.00045268572,0.019507064,0.00077264063,0.0011586339,0.000033115484,0.0002143512,0.72614425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45555198,0.3975038,0.0041060145,0.13111626,0.0025354775,0.00009360262,0.00003287185,0.00008955951,0.008970437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998265,0.0003145454,0.00030382533,0.00025028022,0.00030454303,0.0005618035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998997,0.00015043192,0.0001900515,0.00029374915,0.000054906686,0.0003138797],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011330709,0.0001718866,0.00044069721,0.000015665646,0.0006221136,0.00008943985,0.0002589489,0.00006613294,0.00066863064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055398796,0.00013265267,0.00011386032,0.0003256151,0.0066510625,0.0005557406,0.00006682371,0.00014547518,0.00016398175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.275319e-7,0.000023363264,0.00031331505,0.00019079224,0.0000178668,0.000002724761,0.0017256459,3.7960497e-9,0.0000055404453,0.9665113,0.009154034,0.022054572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006877094,0.000017831224,0.000012872332,0.00053601264,0.00007209104,0.0000047074154,0.00014561691,3.798216e-7,0.00006849901,0.0073917704,0.99146533,0.00021613532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008127751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051979693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9823113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004375592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031782205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W181806217","doi":"","title":"Human Rights in the Global Village: The Challenges of Privacy and National Security","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Human rights; National security; The Right to Privacy; Political science; Law; Right to privacy; Patriot Act; Democracy; Secrecy; Politics","score_opus":0.012701000189044617,"score_gpt":0.2825418435077178,"score_spread":0.2698408433186732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W181806217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7995271,0.013292437,0.00026099206,0.014139943,0.00018088892,0.00029811484,0.0000054354286,0.000018898996,0.1722762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998392,0.00080472307,0.0000038502103,0.00003469792,0.0006467077,0.0000021947003,4.3129697e-7,0.0000021763547,0.00011323116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980568,0.00033521946,0.0001906993,0.00010346222,0.0005549357,0.0007588381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961823,0.000075869684,0.00011730611,0.00008061468,0.00008395901,0.000023995213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033700385,0.00007341478,0.00010158193,0.000028187289,0.00090014836,0.000059142712,0.00042428751,0.0000634037,0.000012422501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027116925,0.000038271723,0.00005406733,0.00015256311,0.0020501295,0.0001474907,0.000020176098,0.00051071605,0.0000015817925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003677137,0.000052273805,0.0009863311,0.0000013450681,0.000013403313,0.0000010104937,0.0024476661,0.00000159479,0.0000027620881,0.9962139,0.00009974166,0.00017626332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000290325,0.000050905765,0.003513594,0.0000056300014,0.000007938633,0.000036989666,0.0024830352,0.000003360599,0.0000029230214,0.98030347,0.013246351,0.000055503664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021554686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13521186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19886489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040232582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059465895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88056827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1832842522","doi":"","title":"If You Don’t Like It Change the Channel: Radio Censorship Policies and Enforcement in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Enforcement; Transparency (behavior); Public broadcasting; Accountability; Media policy; Political science; Broadcasting (networking); Public relations; Public administration; Advertising; Media studies; Business; Sociology; Law; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.023716967631515047,"score_gpt":0.21372750671492308,"score_spread":0.19001053908340804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1832842522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8937551,0.00052848784,0.0001087495,0.02129555,0.0012263346,0.0015041674,0.000052649208,0.0000961576,0.081432804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98496264,0.00068547647,0.0000047330122,0.00091207225,0.00024048267,0.0000036360354,0.0000052691494,0.000008305728,0.013177376],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869955,0.00016111847,0.000110233756,0.00022398276,0.00031122848,0.0004939145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937755,0.00010053896,0.00006226322,0.0001977525,0.00005873909,0.00020313027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018837037,0.00013697484,0.0001581075,0.0001428709,0.0005526005,0.0000683592,0.00043926237,0.00008469955,0.00059718237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016552085,0.00011142316,0.000039561837,0.00049807626,0.0016615102,0.00043165297,0.00009025568,0.0001457141,0.000019901234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031985724,0.00005101108,0.6005031,0.000023456272,0.00005682413,0.000088056666,0.013608479,0.00003921493,6.5976974e-7,0.30231693,0.08123102,0.0020492824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003853062,0.000020995463,0.0024828627,0.000015562337,0.000016058111,3.4393612e-9,0.20407787,0.00007593693,0.00001526178,0.0006056088,0.7921219,0.00018265405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9739331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99895227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7108908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006148419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003213693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65387285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916515311","doi":"","title":"Balancing Privacy and the Open Court Principle of Family Law: Does De-Identifying Case Law Protect Anonymity?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Transparency (behavior); Law; Context (archaeology); Privacy laws of the United States; Privacy law; Internet privacy; Common law; Political science; Expectation of privacy; Right to know; Right to privacy; Sociology; Information privacy; Business; Supreme court; Privacy policy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04861317570297575,"score_gpt":0.3553008274656192,"score_spread":0.30668765176264345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1916515311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95493144,0.0048697386,0.0049221935,0.0046028416,0.0011336188,0.0011140043,0.000011320887,0.00003268887,0.02838218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971262,0.0007115013,0.0010090676,0.00029786432,0.00048534374,0.000009369539,1.1257702e-7,0.000011872754,0.00034863848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791384,0.00059290964,0.00054558896,0.00015063024,0.0004899986,0.0003070224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810046,0.00060966576,0.00061153487,0.00017240204,0.00039962796,0.00010630988],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00560832,0.00014038038,0.0005740073,0.000040373336,0.0015758969,0.00034713937,0.00058849895,0.00005987985,0.000005899384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069958123,0.00007206482,0.000121689496,0.000127785,0.007574412,0.00078817125,0.0004117031,0.00026424805,8.4464216e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014356125,0.000052349904,0.0014908928,0.00007340998,0.00027417368,0.00024078939,0.031097129,0.0000109909615,0.00025047557,0.965452,0.00028897097,0.00062521244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01053061,0.00068499433,0.0017165288,0.001021006,0.00077441556,0.001402239,0.07152694,0.00015107752,0.0026450874,0.19912283,0.7096224,0.0008018723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006820756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010349378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7663292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008638498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013628646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933445904","doi":"10.21991/c9m08k","title":"A REVIEW OF THE KEEGSTRA CASE: SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS HATE PROPAGANDA LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Precedent","score_opus":0.06449293183224578,"score_gpt":0.32258342611082375,"score_spread":0.258090494278578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1933445904","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.449211e-7,0.8487755,0.006418376,0.00096114166,0.004160353,0.0033962356,0.0014968269,0.0001527683,0.13463856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016019245,0.99425256,0.00019345565,0.001328586,0.00047593936,0.00035974765,0.00021700437,0.000035085668,0.0015356838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939086,0.00076456135,0.0020016748,0.0009568203,0.001059883,0.0013084535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568135,0.00034424334,0.001379886,0.0012120386,0.00092590484,0.00045660514],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018532281,0.0008995285,0.0023495683,0.00020980024,0.0040994985,0.00013928657,0.0016946018,0.0008964836,0.001092404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006626398,0.000610974,0.0019549672,0.0010889369,0.1375517,0.00075834163,0.0004374346,0.0009175922,0.0003051381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064899755,0.00013564539,0.000018149503,0.01411556,0.0002715903,0.00015135147,0.000105047584,8.200872e-7,1.13229035e-7,0.95081824,0.016333017,0.018043978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003768379,0.00003028185,1.1307005e-7,0.07336212,0.0010627558,0.0030132309,0.00023786975,0.0000011748477,0.0000019895272,0.012995206,0.9081884,0.0007300175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010250605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017575221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93782306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006417047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012448595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935216946","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006081","title":"Democracy and the Freedom of Speech: Rethinking the Conflict between Liberty and Equality","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Democracy; Value (mathematics); Constitutional law; Law and economics; Campaign finance; Law; Jurisdiction; Negative liberty; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.042061181807438126,"score_gpt":0.28640016838947147,"score_spread":0.24433898658203335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1935216946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9517428,0.0030742474,0.000696823,0.030982524,0.0006600062,0.0006514374,0.000015617443,0.000008817778,0.01216768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817574,0.0002115517,0.00017859308,0.00046698668,0.0005709001,0.0000016715709,1.7802975e-7,0.0000073100655,0.00038704768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802935,0.00063001853,0.00046373598,0.00013048394,0.0004177224,0.00032869584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974957,0.0010584339,0.00040268907,0.00023015143,0.000311542,0.0005014462],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003564783,0.000109728506,0.00031599935,0.000044961642,0.001309622,0.00031219816,0.00068207795,0.00009857246,0.0001177311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038465182,0.000058104342,0.00007778689,0.00015119385,0.018091545,0.00049092254,0.000035652476,0.00038153928,0.0000034032068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012523806,0.0000073133397,0.059046127,0.0000124757935,0.00008125718,0.000025930374,0.08914073,0.000001042397,0.000020013693,0.84598345,0.0010603805,0.0046087555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026695908,0.00031117137,0.08013261,0.0003290577,0.0003771786,0.00011399276,0.013786388,0.000054140553,0.00013740058,0.7157857,0.18579298,0.00050980865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25966915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23630713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1847326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052738742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063590764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1956946349","doi":"10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb03124.x","title":"Action Needed: An Affirmative Change in Affirmative Action Policies","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Andrology","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University College of the North","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Action (physics); Political science; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.12885247120487794,"score_gpt":0.4012905223513434,"score_spread":0.27243805114646547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1956946349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98469,0.00017888624,0.0013924027,0.0045226896,0.0014847931,0.00013578455,0.0000022132308,0.00001446884,0.0075787227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795645,0.0006027931,0.00011286903,0.0004700922,0.00070684345,0.0000030793708,7.382132e-7,0.000005053691,0.00014209183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854684,0.0006553191,0.00027060983,0.00007600689,0.00020234215,0.00024890937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992227,0.00009583938,0.0003418028,0.00005719268,0.00017342139,0.000109051594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008640371,0.00007930477,0.00022365549,0.00024689615,0.0002190706,0.000031851654,0.000117824646,0.00016195097,0.00015441139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013293218,0.00006362411,0.000055548604,0.00029932542,0.0014170397,0.001055846,0.000006189377,0.0002433093,0.000009339708],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004701313,0.00070005865,0.012931902,0.000020535846,0.000107496206,0.00008163066,0.46871623,0.000108174456,0.0016039776,0.49344313,0.0026532637,0.019163463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0070766932,0.005324232,0.041103553,0.00011970268,0.0001715561,0.00076189433,0.33864182,0.00031818895,0.006224775,0.1115866,0.4877312,0.0009397959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008895548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003979715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48507795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015396446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013040307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52211416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967915771","doi":"10.1146/annurev-polisci-010814-104523","title":"Campaign Finance and American Democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Political Science","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Politics; Democracy; Corporate governance; Exceptionalism; Political science; Public administration; American exceptionalism; Constitutional law; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.025062616518355393,"score_gpt":0.361750234960103,"score_spread":0.3366876184417476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967915771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19422626,0.07517087,0.012768399,0.18374002,0.001954146,0.0024501963,0.00019869197,0.00030626843,0.5291851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987583,0.007819595,0.0009299951,0.002648147,0.00015699513,0.000004304499,4.1665658e-7,0.0000034173468,0.0008541541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978636,0.0001332745,0.00023889211,0.0002579052,0.00076376845,0.00074258656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839836,0.00016769384,0.000093421564,0.00019414218,0.00041866617,0.00072769925],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025578064,0.00008152512,0.00027133545,0.00003575548,0.0002882781,0.00003258261,0.00047157236,0.000022957962,0.000025056992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032934258,0.000059126975,0.000042393203,0.0008093585,0.036371257,0.0004723569,0.00009423488,0.00007258645,0.00003588333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010399489,0.000018991153,0.00051171,0.0000667949,7.5885646e-7,0.000001695409,0.0010636618,2.406489e-8,0.000002951503,0.9864581,0.0013472877,0.010526978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002812281,0.00046572878,0.0062822117,0.0018678057,0.00005005863,0.000013638582,0.008507082,0.000024851834,0.00016577964,0.23750648,0.744315,0.0005201004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029590593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010155164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7933567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017030342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008309144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9662512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971051334","doi":"10.1017/s0034670508000119","title":"The Right not to Listen - Patrick M. Garry: Rediscovering a Lost Freedom: The First Amendment Right to Censor Unwanted Speech (New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers, 2006. Pp. ix, 166. $29.95, cloth.)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Politics","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"First amendment; Database transaction; Law; Free speech; Sociology; Political science; Art; Supreme court; Computer science","score_opus":0.02086288196524164,"score_gpt":0.27457146085921597,"score_spread":0.2537085788939743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971051334","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027872106,0.36998343,0.005812263,0.5008387,0.006112097,0.013655363,0.0005378366,0.00038204243,0.074806124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16856608,0.7572172,0.0013511771,0.019002033,0.0065616593,0.000086996915,0.00003359336,0.00016889209,0.047012363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965655,0.00040435896,0.00076163,0.00039005064,0.0010339062,0.0008445482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975976,0.0005608363,0.00029763544,0.00086453126,0.00024367846,0.0004357334],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016976406,0.00031720314,0.00057510176,0.000048505386,0.001933822,0.00027712938,0.0010923784,0.00011817862,0.00025643522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034898092,0.00015586377,0.00025919807,0.0007723352,0.0033815529,0.00038424134,0.00010182904,0.00031668766,0.000089927125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009513629,0.00018893857,0.00025663947,0.0011649679,0.00022289337,0.000035327128,0.01749271,0.000021020942,0.00004512055,0.37456262,0.6012057,0.004708932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034668602,0.000121323545,0.00021155707,0.00094447285,0.0002006728,0.00003487898,0.00075505924,0.000010342592,0.00032517978,0.0013193107,0.99546194,0.00026859328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009638073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075469515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48183668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002922311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006141304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983004278","doi":"10.2105/ajph.92.3.360","title":"Expressive Freedom and Tobacco Advertising: A Canadian Perspective","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Public Health","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Australian Government; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation","keywords":"Tobacco control; Constitutionality; Legislation; Supreme court; Law; Government (linguistics); Tobacco industry; Politics; Power (physics); Perspective (graphical); Freedom of the press; Advertising; Political science; Business; Public health; Medicine","score_opus":0.043184699297198245,"score_gpt":0.30808246659844035,"score_spread":0.2648977673012421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983004278","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25790235,0.011234394,0.020829476,0.59676254,0.0024060365,0.0006940576,0.000055679924,0.0000944769,0.11002097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936695,0.0015862666,0.0012494386,0.0024116375,0.0006674585,0.0000013653603,2.9791073e-7,0.00001126668,0.00040278272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977816,0.00056799414,0.0003475284,0.00016195883,0.00043772458,0.00070322095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968381,0.00014033153,0.0005139348,0.00012395332,0.00045176456,0.0019318935],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014037652,0.000104358405,0.00034856115,0.0002929945,0.0007183986,0.00015937412,0.00030062618,0.00004106687,0.00037023058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005423536,0.00008770304,0.00007562193,0.0005179041,0.0074010133,0.00055593724,0.000015913041,0.00026295605,0.000009480182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006682921,0.00010998317,0.012704704,0.0000034434167,0.00008933977,0.00007260009,0.22501373,0.0000025919303,0.000003333258,0.44190523,0.018297624,0.30179074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096857164,0.0012510112,0.00877043,0.00007725713,0.000018056273,0.00015156387,0.33788833,0.000079279715,8.232648e-7,0.0051689683,0.645244,0.0003817086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36911437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17899981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7357671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010858914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023122826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991352347","doi":"10.1089/elj.2005.4.282","title":"Divergent Disclosure: The Value of Uniformity in State Campaign Finance Disclosure Laws","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Stuart Olson (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Political science; State (computer science); Law; Politics; Corporate governance; Value (mathematics); Economics; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.010146780210504101,"score_gpt":0.2803441252298888,"score_spread":0.2701973450193847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991352347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95623815,0.00092919974,0.0012030143,0.014495616,0.00044974018,0.0002310761,0.000085699816,0.000021801869,0.026345678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916042,0.0039185043,0.00007612933,0.00042405888,0.0014388884,0.000002709228,0.0000016315236,0.000009265288,0.0025245883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842197,0.0002723191,0.00035623022,0.00011687105,0.00034037244,0.0004922351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993208,0.000097891876,0.00019430906,0.00011539592,0.00010906044,0.00016252504],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078598736,0.00012024963,0.00018234206,0.000088156834,0.0014350531,0.00011576696,0.00020035765,0.00007873203,0.000029364712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007723959,0.000079251724,0.00008967952,0.00027519127,0.0028851507,0.00030108925,0.00003252424,0.00030595285,0.000005386177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008947967,0.000059742186,0.0026497429,0.0000054969223,0.000015582204,0.0000016839689,0.007272165,0.00013297868,0.000008749287,0.98687404,0.00031900176,0.0026518628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051816355,0.000125562,0.009733496,0.000039028717,0.000022548033,0.00003694804,0.0009817652,0.00012756465,0.0003114219,0.51319313,0.47470778,0.00020260488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018390765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029994478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47438878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002352373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029099852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009661012","doi":"10.1089/153312904323216186","title":"Improving the U. S. Electoral System: Lessons from Canada and Mexico","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Election Law Journal Rules Politics and Policy","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Election law; Political science; Politics; Bureaucracy; Voting; Local election; Administration (probate law); Public administration; General election; Law","score_opus":0.012390732534815518,"score_gpt":0.2702704301497055,"score_spread":0.25787969761488994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009661012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9337564,0.002360284,0.0043061813,0.03416801,0.0018584802,0.00026925994,0.00013873023,0.00009046064,0.023052175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953611,0.00026364907,0.000060682898,0.001008646,0.0029572058,0.0000019413023,0.0000020801526,0.000010920881,0.0003337588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879354,0.00012562182,0.00019830043,0.00012650642,0.0002859865,0.000470023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992834,0.000090928785,0.00012066694,0.00008242811,0.000099873505,0.00032274512],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002800368,0.000109420725,0.00013846403,0.000046797406,0.0033586177,0.00040991057,0.00012726933,0.00007855589,0.000010054376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006933602,0.000076609635,0.00003762451,0.0001223099,0.0017074107,0.00017363136,0.000020978749,0.0002708958,0.0000016371343],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025335935,0.000006240368,0.00022471034,0.0000047024464,0.000021764832,0.00000548313,0.0011402478,0.0000038437042,0.00006476794,0.9973477,0.00017093078,0.0010070555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017385255,0.00023628182,0.0039515044,0.00013075414,0.00017151028,0.00062353053,0.006689203,0.0001145957,0.0016843498,0.6395849,0.34439,0.0006848684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98823375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9598668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35776284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006885559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014631627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026023157","doi":"10.1177/001452460111300105","title":"What's Wrong with Spong?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Expository Times","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.012932869164829438,"score_gpt":0.24986070566169308,"score_spread":0.23692783649686364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026023157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30943146,0.0037280174,0.002204763,0.0086911945,0.004542587,0.0006365199,0.0000015428888,0.00047830268,0.6702856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8653499,0.0003435319,0.00006279429,0.00024871322,0.0018194201,0.000011101367,9.90817e-7,0.000012323024,0.13215125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990054,0.00016049079,0.00008888432,0.0001426566,0.00032292918,0.00027967984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947935,0.00011087194,0.000044421136,0.00023924788,0.000041912906,0.00008420033],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003415782,0.00008870902,0.0000990341,0.000021880478,0.000907463,0.000269147,0.0003864256,0.000055570734,0.0007115454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000855051,0.000049570386,0.000042506723,0.00014639387,0.004973448,0.00067066716,0.000024048713,0.00008801237,0.00029207172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015496265,0.0001269665,0.0041639223,0.000004900342,0.00009194833,0.000095642405,0.07229497,0.000029423752,0.00033285492,0.87676746,0.034519035,0.011417925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004160136,0.00012577993,0.0010235414,0.000050594947,0.000048780334,0.000017209097,0.023207515,0.000023577903,0.00069624727,0.010183375,0.9639141,0.00029327464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001867598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025504106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9293951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004171821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007898342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034503436","doi":"10.1115/fedsm2003-45710","title":"Calvin W. Rice Lecture 2002: Two-Phase Oxymoron","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oxymoron; First amendment; sort; Free speech; Law; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Supreme court; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.020025879021803646,"score_gpt":0.3155393538812543,"score_spread":0.2955134748594507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034503436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008457379,0.00064269477,0.09269532,0.00097002566,0.0008318239,0.00022064755,0.0000044630315,0.00017537874,0.8960023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8745738,0.00009963566,0.0011909275,0.00095907866,0.00046797408,0.0000061340256,0.0000019383754,0.000011300107,0.12268921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882317,0.00016999176,0.00012495862,0.00020400484,0.00029636797,0.00038148664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994891,0.000079837955,0.00003477638,0.00016914029,0.000049487262,0.00017764542],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003995686,0.000096290016,0.00012095918,0.00003078005,0.00051106507,0.00007732058,0.00017929975,0.00009892854,0.009448577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012911182,0.00007102624,0.00006452949,0.00026195208,0.0022727416,0.00016947104,0.000009102136,0.00010284766,0.0004924475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004919066,0.00011986843,0.00009455406,0.0000023184546,0.000009351297,0.000010988311,0.0033964517,0.000005468136,0.00031461878,0.96830136,0.024192957,0.0035471583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010417782,0.00004660671,0.000017887865,0.0000037145091,0.000016027529,0.0000023256125,0.00086407474,0.00002563763,0.0014915358,0.022090377,0.9741903,0.00020973396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015994157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034860005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94999737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006996695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014697351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039599175","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1481289","title":"The Right to Pass Freely: Circulation, Begging and the Mobile Self","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Begging; Circulation (fluid dynamics); Business; Political science; Law; Mechanics; Physics","score_opus":0.0039923519420405965,"score_gpt":0.2404815077640867,"score_spread":0.2364891558220461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039599175","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5200215,0.04095231,0.14243771,0.22996941,0.002887842,0.0032392137,0.0000046982595,0.0004957209,0.059991598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99118096,0.00550549,0.000027418864,0.0004407717,0.0010123637,0.000007850434,2.7166573e-7,0.000006561719,0.0018183257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759585,0.0002851999,0.00019787526,0.0001344152,0.00038516187,0.0014015215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993474,0.00020354861,0.0000993903,0.00014591758,0.00009271968,0.000111028916],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00418352,0.00009277081,0.00011968904,0.00003338078,0.003357479,0.0003039334,0.00039995,0.000055811775,0.000020024176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078658006,0.000046329977,0.000078849764,0.00021613695,0.0015133237,0.00019226817,0.000016707249,0.00066141767,0.000014998052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016034217,0.000012367073,0.00025927054,2.3981573e-7,0.00003355893,9.93128e-7,0.0055768425,0.000020826774,0.000009704372,0.9803343,0.0002759296,0.013459957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005299703,0.00007318962,0.00040790235,0.000004838957,0.000027592496,0.000046489957,0.0032976945,0.00006068175,0.0000057869456,0.85065347,0.14479601,0.00009638698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000116749005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032398328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47115946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004261495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000863894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W206675796","doi":"","title":"Detect, Disrupt, and Detain: Local Law Enforcement's Critical Roles in Combating Homegrown Extremism and the Evolving Terrorist Threat","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Radicalization; Law enforcement; Law; Statute; Political science; Al qaeda; Homeland security; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.012474539918975576,"score_gpt":0.27265163670737125,"score_spread":0.2601770967883957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W206675796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19274406,0.004795085,0.28682706,0.018002855,0.00053841196,0.0011244791,0.000011711147,0.0002817665,0.49567458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823976,0.0001602024,0.0001883982,0.0002580862,0.00014845918,0.00001565868,2.9739732e-7,0.000008147301,0.0009810132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986827,0.00019380757,0.00021906431,0.00024476185,0.00026370128,0.00039601588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984982,0.0011627498,0.000032166692,0.00013293097,0.00003937727,0.0001345753],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009147281,0.00012285016,0.00019612997,0.00002778517,0.00071963214,0.00018450384,0.00016224,0.00009039916,0.00022786949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024891776,0.00005843037,0.000036704696,0.00008151973,0.019352635,0.00039783542,0.00009978449,0.000091315436,0.0000032064029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020184598,0.000010647853,0.004883706,0.000006831699,0.000005796918,0.0000058194546,0.0047674174,1.8203097e-7,0.00006699664,0.972295,0.000038633036,0.017898824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010274876,0.00022809985,0.0038643489,0.0005019519,0.00012254572,0.000034638695,0.065211706,0.00587065,0.0011831446,0.88651514,0.024976557,0.0012163691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037804213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026380196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8054957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006199165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031396256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094230622","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgen.1000297","title":"Taken to School: An Interview with the Honorable Judge John E. Jones, III","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS Genetics","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Mile; State (computer science); Library science; Gerontology; History; Archaeology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.06940914835400142,"score_gpt":0.2693723740495148,"score_spread":0.1999632256955134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094230622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91313034,0.0037453184,0.011157782,0.013181521,0.0006706202,0.0014393212,0.000022024902,0.00029452133,0.05635853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825933,0.0014261459,0.001502313,0.0027792389,0.001064032,0.000045180008,0.000005444481,0.00003411627,0.010550259],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860036,0.00018473965,0.00015282544,0.00024407581,0.00043666462,0.0003813392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990321,0.00003876076,0.000055988316,0.0004199512,0.00014170457,0.00031150584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002994984,0.00012602402,0.000170902,0.000034727902,0.00084513193,0.000104847335,0.00061600644,0.00007490254,0.00035176112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027042835,0.00007819356,0.000040885487,0.0003270281,0.002349788,0.00012647703,0.000060278366,0.0001269709,0.00027286893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022829836,0.0022446997,0.031403318,0.00013458123,0.0006318368,0.00019708509,0.32973957,0.0007256539,0.0050494163,0.19277355,0.41541365,0.021458352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004328541,0.00035923516,0.00074935314,0.000038128903,0.00006549124,0.0000062536888,0.003149845,0.00012463519,0.0025946435,0.0011837619,0.9909371,0.00035870503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019562739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039397674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57552344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005352322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022214893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86578923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125505034","doi":"10.7202/1022310ar","title":"Freedom of the Press as a Discrete Constitutional Guarantee","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of the press; Meaning (existential); Charter; Context (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Freedom of information; Supreme court; Section (typography); Scope (computer science); State (computer science); Originalism; Sociology; Computer science; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.019057966154315636,"score_gpt":0.26755384469360893,"score_spread":0.2484958785392933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125505034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022923835,0.00013571174,0.006852625,0.001824859,0.002179709,0.00014656696,0.00005044868,0.000023006172,0.9864947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976358,0.000066249384,0.0001884292,0.00018176872,0.0007660493,0.000001855449,4.9569513e-7,0.0000046219834,0.0011547334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848914,0.0002858459,0.00025026329,0.0001075641,0.00061039446,0.0002568059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992763,0.000118075994,0.00018840848,0.00016043641,0.0001590129,0.00009778252],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082727073,0.00008285472,0.00015100173,0.00001612383,0.004134768,0.0000642321,0.00050523324,0.00007722903,0.00029194745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017264248,0.00004851242,0.00016796545,0.00008004937,0.020298708,0.0002309226,0.000050279676,0.00021829679,0.000022251326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012503808,0.000024296802,0.00012801687,0.000002314821,0.000023108174,0.0000024886108,0.00036332445,0.00007109127,0.000032421834,0.99837935,0.000607747,0.00035334536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042640028,0.000033224784,0.000050960527,0.000038311588,0.00002500002,0.000046216188,0.00017070548,0.000049615595,0.00030948027,0.08561406,0.9131499,0.000086109234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001743327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044919658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046383804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004296264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135545778","doi":"","title":"Dignity and Speech: The Regulation of Hate Speech in a Democracy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Democracy; Political science; Human rights; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.019927556048057328,"score_gpt":0.270995201432523,"score_spread":0.25106764538446563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135545778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9279349,0.00030783302,0.0003012903,0.005810187,0.00022008999,0.0004523805,0.0000055660034,0.00006015944,0.06490759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964457,0.00011500177,0.0005248493,0.00034732575,0.000257909,0.000002222984,0.0000024392134,0.0000051485267,0.0022994096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987848,0.00020422015,0.00023223377,0.00018888009,0.00033489917,0.00025496815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938285,0.0001197194,0.00010122962,0.0002271696,0.00006594211,0.00010307425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009307732,0.00008801148,0.00016543963,0.000036400736,0.00041083348,0.00008968799,0.00022778529,0.0001031634,0.00015078692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015392347,0.000065311775,0.0000468255,0.00028271077,0.002402165,0.00039513625,0.000025278932,0.00015856687,0.000031009273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022970782,0.00006551575,0.0083008455,0.000006021102,0.0000059225786,0.0000058876694,0.002405513,0.0000051315233,0.0007686065,0.9683618,0.00055691146,0.019494904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008052161,0.000086508575,0.13639042,0.000065439315,0.0000231412,0.0000046575233,0.00083956675,0.0000771705,0.0031095166,0.819266,0.039086293,0.00024607292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033210237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011004268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14909577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049936138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000572313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88508767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152997450","doi":"10.3390/laws3030388","title":"“Jones-ing” for a Solution: Commercial Street Surveillance and Privacy Torts in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Laws","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Plaintiff; Tort; Embarrassment; Business; Privacy laws of the United States; Internet privacy; Liability; Trespass; Harm; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Information privacy; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.017919389721575654,"score_gpt":0.2531406261097571,"score_spread":0.2352212363881815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152997450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639817,0.0002695898,0.007911248,0.00808866,0.0020143643,0.0006658802,0.000052589567,0.00005911472,0.01695688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987376,0.000022554334,0.00016390927,0.00024985656,0.00047084264,0.000012097434,0.0000052322694,0.0000047098015,0.000333204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992557,0.00008640678,0.00011538251,0.00013863917,0.00014977586,0.00025406116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995774,0.00017321105,0.00003932154,0.00010149799,0.000029471756,0.000079117155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039311303,0.00005840119,0.00013332981,0.000012128777,0.00027168027,0.000027881173,0.00012286383,0.000042323907,0.00002264275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097673386,0.00005309167,0.000017840925,0.0000730253,0.000683053,0.00007757099,0.000023049693,0.00004116436,8.7504986e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019498699,0.000022692948,0.4769964,0.000019112469,0.0000064088927,0.0000031056425,0.003091882,0.0000038019273,0.0000072973357,0.48986912,0.014382149,0.015578532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006807518,0.000031832424,0.09032551,0.000014551518,0.0000034194209,3.8378568e-7,0.00035140367,0.0002744011,0.000012004815,0.008905084,0.89920855,0.0001920833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8849311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8848264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014640008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003252327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25167373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2186769447","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v8n4p208","title":"Academic Freedom in the Heartland: Rights Consciousness and the United States Supreme Court","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Supreme court; Law; Academic freedom; Politics; State (computer science); Officer; Doctrine; Public administration; Corporate governance; Higher education; Management","score_opus":0.030401795988019325,"score_gpt":0.2989881768746177,"score_spread":0.26858638088659836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2186769447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9540979,0.0015094959,0.00028743932,0.033862527,0.000614267,0.0002087075,0.00001627161,0.000007838426,0.009395527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99700767,0.0008186799,0.000023438022,0.0013563768,0.0005894483,7.503352e-7,0.0000012658934,0.0000034453699,0.00019894532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868935,0.00039634845,0.00026200124,0.000057999587,0.00035866737,0.00023561381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989138,0.00054780097,0.0001249008,0.00007209679,0.00016741661,0.00017398458],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024037403,0.00006974366,0.00018118802,0.00005857103,0.00037907297,0.00012984182,0.00021337974,0.00008028983,0.0000068857976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008301819,0.000030879124,0.000032842894,0.000113116526,0.011076947,0.00014129006,0.00002086236,0.00031282136,9.387941e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002241986,0.000013826698,0.0011453587,0.0000024264302,0.000011703455,0.000011894939,0.029995263,0.000011314016,5.8863947e-7,0.9656374,0.003140554,0.000007294104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018244534,0.00006204969,0.00017705718,0.000025658936,0.000034221022,0.000055815177,0.010719553,0.00024117915,0.0000037559428,0.49982646,0.48696318,0.00006662138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010991179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040321844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4838226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026903725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010204166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99559474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203332058","doi":"10.4324/9780203517451-30","title":"Internet surveillance and popular constitutionalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; The Internet; Electronic surveillance; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer security; Business; Law and economics; Computer science; Law; Democracy; Sociology; Politics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.010882562194835816,"score_gpt":0.2470510430285132,"score_spread":0.23616848083367736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203332058","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38925985,0.0122859655,0.52527994,0.009711359,0.0026596764,0.00030863628,0.0000064158535,0.0001700515,0.060318105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888151,0.0035397117,0.000043111635,0.0001435781,0.0008124931,0.0000010050516,0.0000017021499,0.000005292006,0.006638004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818987,0.00021062087,0.00014113709,0.00012570663,0.00024761492,0.001085071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996354,0.000048547645,0.00007628656,0.00006707185,0.00006561699,0.00010706737],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026570307,0.00007370432,0.00011830573,0.00003870498,0.00044775015,0.00009520968,0.00018905713,0.00006652285,0.000052332784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001432345,0.000060322032,0.000046030815,0.00007315948,0.003354922,0.00016449811,0.000017500734,0.00052811654,0.000024833247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005685165,0.000009168368,0.008491924,8.366299e-7,0.000022471837,9.432876e-7,0.00048469505,9.336121e-7,0.0000075866374,0.986688,0.00028840813,0.003999305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031531838,0.00005544495,0.00029341062,0.000006368309,0.000006212924,0.00009136858,0.0005007724,0.000027014687,0.0000032813414,0.70633835,0.2922599,0.00010253229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004206778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007355868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59955525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000286224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008309474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217014079","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1446","title":"Using the Charter to Stop Racial Profiling: The Development of an Equality-Based Conception of Arbitrary Detention","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Racial profiling; Charter; Criminology; Rationality; Reasonable suspicion; Profiling (computer programming); Law; Racism; Offensive; Political science; Pretext; Sociology; Race (biology); Politics; Gender studies; Operations research; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.1401032799816692,"score_gpt":0.3488697523661616,"score_spread":0.2087664723844924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217014079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6897985,0.00021817801,0.23200555,0.0019164988,0.0012474055,0.00088043965,0.0000136051485,0.000040276558,0.07387956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99058336,0.0000050930726,0.008596103,0.00020899148,0.0005176063,0.0000039753772,0.0000018328021,0.000007500524,0.00007551167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981403,0.000493026,0.00043543574,0.000113534305,0.0005848533,0.00023286245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919856,0.000059681348,0.00030947928,0.0001407387,0.0001883617,0.00010319211],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018813618,0.00008636329,0.00014513182,0.000033520068,0.0013419093,0.000079807025,0.00032184934,0.0000716862,0.00022848918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027740434,0.000050093266,0.00009501658,0.00013930925,0.0017767162,0.00026062326,0.000017418168,0.00018051513,0.0000053829112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005090351,0.0001966173,0.00039326117,0.000013439239,0.000036943355,0.000001968686,0.045776073,0.00017689813,0.009460346,0.93626195,0.00002012206,0.007611502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011819496,0.002165805,0.005195074,0.0013965156,0.00091793056,0.00011294457,0.122054376,0.030108608,0.32045487,0.412552,0.09007695,0.0031454347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006723417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010670983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52370995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007397727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013287358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222453259","doi":"","title":"Privacy: Rights, Remedies and Reform","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy policy; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Business; Privacy law; Privacy rights; Law; Political science; Information privacy; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.021083310286950634,"score_gpt":0.2752961108943113,"score_spread":0.2542128006073606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222453259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46933421,0.046375453,0.03188392,0.035785355,0.0046919594,0.000770861,0.0000052346736,0.00045901575,0.41069397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721064,0.007264936,0.0001265638,0.00008396156,0.0016604752,0.000002132114,0.000001002256,0.0000105676145,0.01874399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973759,0.00011629397,0.00018675848,0.00014495401,0.0004681594,0.0017079115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934244,0.000025116333,0.00010316618,0.00011527029,0.0001386779,0.00027535312],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003060831,0.00010173069,0.00015144229,0.00006555082,0.00082025665,0.00011506569,0.00029800748,0.000095447846,0.000025117406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010185884,0.00006953025,0.0000513408,0.00013488042,0.0028741902,0.00042956663,0.00003799694,0.00078808627,0.000034332334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000176566,0.000016550166,0.00044764538,8.9366984e-7,0.00003651047,0.0000037125044,0.0056139817,1.3694697e-7,0.00000611846,0.9886166,0.0008464158,0.0043938165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039729654,0.00012466591,0.000027733771,0.00000667058,0.000015022209,0.00007096391,0.0074147326,0.0000030122203,0.000014157709,0.724997,0.2668293,0.000099455574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011567054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01444307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50277215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015654177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023776924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230790418","doi":"","title":"Criminal Responses to Hate Motivated Violence: Is Bill C-41 Tough Enough?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hatred; Redress; Denunciation; Hate crime; Political science; Law; Criminology; Parliament; Criminal law; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.025703333445925805,"score_gpt":0.2875243057062493,"score_spread":0.2618209722603235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230790418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9712169,0.0022457705,0.011783914,0.00899905,0.00081364677,0.00032661282,0.000009771047,0.00014132023,0.004462969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516382,0.015846163,0.00017181151,0.00084074447,0.0012255298,0.000007025271,0.0000015119838,0.000027324628,0.030241672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.994896,0.00039310337,0.00038210183,0.0003464958,0.0008122471,0.003170052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884737,0.0001299298,0.00015824698,0.00023320403,0.00027141054,0.00035982046],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021179758,0.00021909879,0.00027864752,0.00020268325,0.0020855148,0.00011080705,0.00069057354,0.00016743444,0.00035302126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030897188,0.00015906373,0.00018082795,0.000584382,0.0025044314,0.00043412801,0.000047485464,0.0011991282,0.00028378607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062193244,0.00024454706,0.0045906072,0.0000057264233,0.00018586447,0.00013357683,0.042564724,0.000015091849,0.0010421962,0.9231614,0.005100249,0.022334127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018983072,0.001802745,0.0027340523,0.00017056795,0.00013938136,0.0012450211,0.024181183,0.000018603867,0.003027187,0.63982284,0.32382742,0.0011327169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018830793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012547803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31872717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011619629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047538877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237729157","doi":"","title":"Protecting the Social Value of Privacy in the Context of State Investigations Using New Technologies","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Information privacy; Privacy by Design; Privacy policy; Personally identifiable information; Charter; Right to privacy; Internet privacy; Context (archaeology); State (computer science); The Right to Privacy; Value (mathematics); Privacy law; Agency (philosophy); Privacy laws of the United States; Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; Sociology; Politics; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.03627339416166526,"score_gpt":0.31815257096799343,"score_spread":0.2818791768063282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237729157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9488489,0.0008937441,0.04352651,0.005706552,0.0000895112,0.0003697213,8.3326285e-7,0.000023510427,0.00054073514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99921095,0.0002678635,0.00020066639,0.0000356429,0.00017423577,0.0000013727196,1.2125763e-7,0.000005469678,0.000103647515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795246,0.00033990844,0.00033589854,0.00007684431,0.00036277858,0.00093213853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918306,0.00026956943,0.00035059743,0.00009513871,0.00008251173,0.000019146732],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008272399,0.000067890796,0.00012946523,0.00008727061,0.0010984523,0.000035334033,0.00057137385,0.000073253024,0.0000026061464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006966919,0.000038845155,0.000073026924,0.0005404026,0.0035585326,0.00015862669,0.000029218943,0.0013597655,4.314016e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009969729,0.000019671985,0.0013615537,0.0000022453141,0.000025456244,5.0674015e-7,0.068552226,0.000016015894,0.00088129286,0.908591,0.000010867887,0.0205292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024952836,0.00005623556,0.00022551461,0.000020016492,0.000014921518,0.000012678779,0.22418793,0.00002305916,0.0014112976,0.77292,0.00082434306,0.000054468725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027224536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013525694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1556357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036964347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002949123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249755711","doi":"","title":"Paternalistic Manipulation through Pictorial Warnings: The First Amendment, Commercial Speech, and the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commercial speech; Scrutiny; Tobacco control; Supreme court; Tobacco product; Business; Advertising; Smokeless tobacco; Paternalism; Law; Surgeon general; Political science; First amendment; Medicine; Environmental health; Public health","score_opus":0.020932283346236185,"score_gpt":0.2777290049857116,"score_spread":0.2567967216394754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249755711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94293505,0.0068199025,0.03979186,0.0047143167,0.0026809205,0.0006988246,0.0000027365427,0.000039237613,0.0023171534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903253,0.0045143166,0.000008912339,0.00024682103,0.0045865537,0.000008309202,0.0000016201625,0.000011320797,0.00029688745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975945,0.00046226504,0.00025291104,0.00012165216,0.00040080474,0.0011679145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999265,0.00025319992,0.00027266343,0.00009565322,0.000050551673,0.00006291226],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004012281,0.00012810394,0.00017407072,0.000022912838,0.0020339587,0.00027136438,0.00021818776,0.00008748499,0.000019667414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010121541,0.00007112139,0.00008238255,0.00008310384,0.0017436409,0.0005905236,0.000031202326,0.0007610756,0.0000027290403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018635996,0.00003199079,0.06356916,0.0000023124612,0.00013196934,5.3355876e-7,0.01492266,0.0000023263542,0.000010508848,0.90842235,0.00010767985,0.012612132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008073145,0.0002788679,0.031937614,0.000062545914,0.0005171663,0.00012079264,0.011927662,0.00007228153,0.000010225119,0.8677362,0.07889352,0.0003699629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014658718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045213075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07878584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039931908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025039038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253597620","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2696120","title":"Balancing Transparency and Accountability with Privacy in Improving the Police Handling of Sexual Assaults","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Sexual assault; Transparency (behavior); Business; Computer security; Internet privacy; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency; Poison control; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.020566123869484133,"score_gpt":0.27584500876981344,"score_spread":0.2552788849003293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253597620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98648417,0.0010348003,0.011191329,0.0004629887,0.00008139848,0.00014056532,0.0000011279083,0.0000115102075,0.00059208483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922985,0.00030006483,0.00005911165,0.000019491225,0.00025854437,0.000002110003,3.5455784e-7,0.0000073325505,0.00012315749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979151,0.00019368192,0.0002433913,0.00015317461,0.0004056423,0.001088998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994143,0.00010833523,0.00014751799,0.00011843154,0.00011717036,0.00009422381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005063322,0.00009034698,0.00016238459,0.00004730919,0.00032456874,0.0000673955,0.00027989116,0.000065361666,0.0000036169943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011051887,0.000054638753,0.000020365826,0.00021778932,0.0014101635,0.0003744262,0.000016942387,0.0007905113,4.802247e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034022503,0.00018136029,0.335995,0.00004058458,0.00010935319,0.000003225404,0.27093846,0.000115339826,0.001057801,0.35491937,0.000014582467,0.03628469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008988195,0.0025434284,0.028294051,0.00020986612,0.00026378158,0.00032055797,0.5891804,0.0009196234,0.0004276782,0.36564454,0.002198369,0.0010094895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016800711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15219644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31824195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005450544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003316672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254418222","doi":"","title":"Finding Life in Hurricane Shelby: Reviving the Voting Rights Act by Reforming Section 3 Preclearance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Election law; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Plaintiff; Context (archaeology); Voter registration; Economic Justice; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.015299245489500908,"score_gpt":0.23370257875210895,"score_spread":0.21840333326260805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254418222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.562602,0.0005116228,0.011932224,0.0030425887,0.0014067917,0.0010467911,0.0000068656614,0.00028094617,0.41917017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965213,0.00014620417,0.000019604817,0.00005910269,0.0004885765,0.0000014421225,0.000001304871,0.000014040117,0.034056704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976252,0.0011006083,0.00020376718,0.0002865143,0.00026068056,0.0005232341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861795,0.00070663553,0.00020099334,0.00028416485,0.00009289824,0.000097376826],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002252057,0.0001660374,0.000208215,0.00012151451,0.0033236407,0.0001088305,0.0010124063,0.000084443534,0.00008422777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002191866,0.00009253637,0.00009675676,0.0010869355,0.0025123046,0.00046672273,0.00015437967,0.00042792072,0.00009008782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012558191,0.00014299226,0.004783003,0.00005924337,0.0001085301,0.000008359888,0.17757954,0.00042972248,0.0004833678,0.7813755,0.0038499043,0.031054193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005633404,0.000046970305,0.0009182361,0.00019017312,0.000058999154,0.0000016911023,0.0058267135,0.0027866508,0.00013600524,0.0025994792,0.986551,0.00032072605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015861561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015084197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9827011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003959675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011563259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258841679","doi":"10.55016/ojs/ajer.v61i2.55886","title":"A Storm Over This Court: Law, Politics, and Supreme Court Decision Making in Brown v. Board of Education (2013) by Jeffrey D. Hockett","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Journal of Educational Research","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Politics; Storm; Political science; Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.043220612622053275,"score_gpt":0.3930293254414115,"score_spread":0.3498087128193582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258841679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9190805,0.0020912248,0.00010096499,0.04543733,0.00094386755,0.0002655096,0.000016409029,9.877692e-7,0.032063197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97330254,0.0013206148,0.00027610178,0.00015554747,0.0006948446,0.0000073525885,0.0000023934415,0.000013702025,0.024226917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970965,0.0003807594,0.0005314243,0.00019861743,0.0013367682,0.00045596625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98563915,0.0124115795,0.00025458063,0.00018703383,0.0012190222,0.00028860234],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020563959,0.0001041761,0.00022813232,0.00037749799,0.00036723237,0.0000920015,0.0004582976,0.0001317366,0.006134668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053526345,0.00007462794,0.00007113829,0.00030909662,0.003742051,0.00065961014,0.000058613452,0.00027158874,0.000048026595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010182598,0.0005150482,0.10382236,0.000019400992,0.000032116168,4.0836449e-7,0.005734104,3.9425578e-7,0.0005232958,0.581646,0.30388442,0.0037206186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012799167,0.0002867383,0.03983421,0.001166953,0.000030172456,0.000025506917,0.0029143551,0.000008157372,0.0003009701,0.1480096,0.8058586,0.00028479748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021629443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029547563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5019742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005884519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029873098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259420773","doi":"","title":"Should the Charter Apply to Universities","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Scrutiny; Political science; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Autonomy; Constitutional law; Academic freedom; Public administration; Higher education","score_opus":0.03378054235150256,"score_gpt":0.28830597299168714,"score_spread":0.25452543064018457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259420773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21750152,0.00622694,0.19932368,0.20986095,0.0048441053,0.0010658092,0.000009717234,0.00031026057,0.360857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9454877,0.00048679116,0.000020806296,0.00094946846,0.0015969519,0.000002023409,4.8065084e-7,0.000008942939,0.05144688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977823,0.00013517277,0.00009852593,0.000098850964,0.00044220535,0.0014429602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950224,0.000035028075,0.000048201277,0.000108365886,0.00011207741,0.00019411315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022283269,0.00007543998,0.000090247944,0.000050310904,0.0007574605,0.00011554718,0.00048180076,0.000057637582,0.000071664974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022721026,0.000047846937,0.00006725474,0.00018177489,0.001395336,0.00023596146,0.000028559078,0.0006773365,0.00016721035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015893913,0.000010548685,0.000096868614,2.3352598e-7,0.000028876117,0.0000020364187,0.022025734,0.000007584311,0.000005148288,0.97098106,0.0040184697,0.0028075455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000243806,0.000121714365,0.000013721091,0.000003125034,0.000016432534,0.00002417138,0.1262183,0.0000050207095,0.0000071351096,0.27365652,0.59959614,0.000093920746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004485644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004992298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72798616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011774164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037496898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6651789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261181044","doi":"","title":"One Step Forward or Two Steps Back? R. v. Tessling and the Privacy Consequences for Information Held by Third Parties","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Appeal; Charter; Supreme court; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.02602217499714941,"score_gpt":0.26085047916984094,"score_spread":0.23482830417269154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261181044","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31485575,0.004006975,0.37105122,0.07064273,0.00096016144,0.004773288,0.00020141665,0.00034399974,0.23316447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905495,0.0010485413,0.0042415047,0.00011079945,0.000053811218,0.0000012547379,0.000006254251,0.0000032437297,0.0039850757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929774,0.00006452233,0.00009282684,0.000103564336,0.00023397493,0.00020736954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933106,0.00019274374,0.00016465243,0.000120029654,0.00011546513,0.00007605082],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046205058,0.000076343196,0.0001885658,0.000014821238,0.0008059,0.00006177075,0.0002756991,0.00006922945,0.00054504874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000077230514,0.00006193253,0.00006184108,0.000048481354,0.00599559,0.0015568094,0.00005653981,0.000046969973,0.000008187445],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006616938,0.000042413896,0.00019620647,0.000070713475,0.000093146904,6.57274e-7,0.2781493,0.00002216889,0.0000693165,0.70285267,0.002058314,0.015783412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016853197,0.0006056449,0.0014375264,0.00021924436,0.00031928887,0.0000021934422,0.7277449,0.00045946645,0.00044981414,0.019041738,0.23220056,0.00066644355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14448825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14402251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6838109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014675457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016184062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263593527","doi":"","title":"Perlustration in the Pathless Woods: Hamed v R","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law enforcement; Enforcement; Computer security; Law; Political science; Business; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.032470548737644774,"score_gpt":0.2664523431612441,"score_spread":0.23398179442359934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263593527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7141871,0.0040239478,0.051992424,0.0059768516,0.0015078313,0.0007705335,0.00000222938,0.00009855031,0.22144055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956965,0.0019906026,0.000032639575,0.00012238843,0.00056251267,0.000005686037,6.826752e-7,0.0000059274853,0.0015830817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977103,0.00034771886,0.00017560598,0.00010323707,0.00033639616,0.0013267483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996729,0.000041030242,0.00008638033,0.00010349227,0.00004755512,0.00004868023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037200397,0.000071762704,0.00008668583,0.000052386666,0.0005358352,0.00007769983,0.0004395716,0.00008068065,0.00011274341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054848326,0.000045573095,0.00006394194,0.00020226854,0.0012437861,0.0002921035,0.0000074248123,0.0009532851,0.000023617342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010846856,0.000052200325,0.0015409945,5.002488e-7,0.00000985047,0.000004236817,0.03131348,4.1752062e-7,0.0000105562885,0.9587513,0.000065817534,0.008239786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003602601,0.00013484042,0.0011481487,0.000007876017,0.000013392086,0.000043771102,0.06718592,0.0000076839815,0.0000151473305,0.9229613,0.008012264,0.00010941282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008404392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03454444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2815094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039600956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016010255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9830726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265870395","doi":"","title":"Catalyzing More Adequate Federal Habeas Review of Summation Misconduct: Persuasion Theory and the Sixth Amendment Right to an Unbiased Jury","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Oklahoma College of Law - Digital Commons (University of Oklahoma)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Habeas corpus; Scrutiny; Law; Political science; Jury; Misconduct; Persuasion; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Social psychology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.01588964028428263,"score_gpt":0.22855108135588803,"score_spread":0.2126614410716054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265870395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90640545,0.0012737473,0.0020615908,0.0036768387,0.000108568245,0.0011493767,0.0012564808,0.000058019265,0.084009916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964044,0.0002565536,0.00041250951,0.000033353506,0.00002123647,1.3411852e-7,0.00008356151,0.000010505906,0.002777765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802786,0.00038591883,0.00030482747,0.00034309624,0.00064364134,0.00029467238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980779,0.00038433334,0.0005279683,0.00046264214,0.00035549162,0.00019164104],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008411638,0.00021106494,0.0006951058,0.00019228716,0.0010485391,0.000028516075,0.00079948624,0.00013047266,0.00014839733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039991533,0.00021500739,0.00030661997,0.00049652334,0.011156252,0.0011498143,0.00029566244,0.0001303187,0.0000032932453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009372034,0.00043752996,0.00037647723,0.00036105234,0.000109963585,0.00004214806,0.010405406,0.000010014559,0.00013187734,0.98491,0.0013148603,0.00096347847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03917206,0.003899782,0.014340949,0.01287428,0.003120717,0.00006707042,0.5817057,0.00060990354,0.003298168,0.11479246,0.22218856,0.003930332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008427429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00973492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87011755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015821164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002028008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99817556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267362154","doi":"","title":"Mind your Metaphors: An Examination of the Inefficacy Argument as a Reason Against Regulating On-line Conduct","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Excuse; Normative; Realm; Accountability; Epistemology; Metaphor; Morality; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03304993472332848,"score_gpt":0.30493385290046476,"score_spread":0.2718839181771363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267362154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98862505,0.00079674757,0.0011288762,0.0011254267,0.00024790733,0.00021589537,0.0000019995805,0.000014661019,0.007843457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942846,0.00043247637,0.000084038475,0.000042973705,0.00088065414,0.0000027150018,0.0000054756715,0.000013456687,0.0042536184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720556,0.00051716994,0.00036152513,0.00018719885,0.0006832906,0.0010452636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991,0.000075616874,0.00039541844,0.0001974737,0.00016089836,0.00007056619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036338326,0.00012785004,0.00018240424,0.00008375319,0.0006881534,0.00008271711,0.0003774923,0.000094853785,0.000048965765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018730898,0.00008418651,0.00013250015,0.00031171128,0.0010784994,0.00029292228,0.000018733495,0.0006669059,0.0000075464977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026760577,0.00024856042,0.00022579037,0.000002026594,0.00005706495,0.0000013735475,0.0033050876,0.00046806794,0.0023916909,0.91002655,0.0000338757,0.08321316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045017567,0.0023320944,0.0072197393,0.00026265034,0.0003108522,0.00011869741,0.042148355,0.001336712,0.015399751,0.9007594,0.02469725,0.00091276644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004446105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00377939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08230039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007440187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012563105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5292789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267421889","doi":"","title":"(En)raged or (En)gaged: The Implications of Racial Context to the Canadian Provocation Defence","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Provocation test; Contextualization; Context (archaeology); Racism; Criminology; Supreme court; Law; Psychology; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); History; Medicine","score_opus":0.03249130279864126,"score_gpt":0.2450161744141586,"score_spread":0.21252487161551734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267421889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5180474,0.00036668766,0.0045297057,0.38250342,0.00055780134,0.0023350744,0.0001491606,0.00010027607,0.091410466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96962804,0.0001031787,0.0002684803,0.00030886653,0.00007912812,0.0000019987904,0.0000034028863,0.0000066336197,0.029600276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851716,0.0004947416,0.00009396506,0.00022190069,0.00037197117,0.00030027845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987056,0.0002564732,0.00013738548,0.00043896443,0.00025819943,0.0002033573],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010709991,0.00009395278,0.00014731729,0.00010910647,0.0035553672,0.00005863836,0.0010055352,0.00012662842,0.0007960193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028198585,0.000071186725,0.00009147309,0.00063202396,0.0028786361,0.00044876858,0.000103565755,0.00025094365,0.00019935156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052784188,0.00007283013,0.005079561,0.000015191831,0.000059071343,0.0000071358513,0.22284396,0.000042075764,0.0004848085,0.72198325,0.038440943,0.010918404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045600306,0.00007902675,0.037432097,0.000026816197,0.000076939876,0.0000031491468,0.09847211,0.000040944087,0.00007198497,0.0008882074,0.8622429,0.00020981998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08976294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9512036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86144066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004063121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033319436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268461570","doi":"","title":"The Power to Govern Men and Things’: Patriarchal Origins of the Police Power in American Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Law; State police; Legislation; State (computer science); Political science; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Sociology; Law enforcement; Business","score_opus":0.008960533000644606,"score_gpt":0.2635246320497798,"score_spread":0.2545640990491352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268461570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6894977,0.00029901322,0.00007066847,0.019089842,0.0005001326,0.0006517491,0.000036171576,0.00006252764,0.2897922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938698,0.00008203082,0.00015163032,0.0027255088,0.00031299103,0.000011407177,3.7123874e-7,0.000014273422,0.002831988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816155,0.00027188796,0.00026373376,0.0002515065,0.0005699955,0.0004812949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998933,0.00025561886,0.00012958261,0.00039400172,0.000064012085,0.00022374092],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009079906,0.00013447274,0.0002087401,0.000021743448,0.0007236225,0.0001382322,0.00065942237,0.00007196343,0.00011827164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010473288,0.00007838023,0.000083941035,0.00039420874,0.006334663,0.00034845725,0.00015388467,0.0002496497,0.000064166416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022740664,0.000033458167,0.0027654844,0.0000012752673,0.000012496667,7.1927553e-7,0.026754476,0.000003856773,0.000090015004,0.968606,0.0011638696,0.00054558617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037221328,0.0000657888,0.0037966694,0.000018465398,0.000009149466,9.387234e-7,0.007773397,0.0000053563544,0.00019106174,0.006062289,0.981548,0.00015666123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16129386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21626319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9803841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026427148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012371705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99636954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269871599","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900000515","title":"The Social Character of Freedom of Expression","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Adjudication; Ideal (ethics); Political science; Politics; Constitutional right; Freedom of expression; Law; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Constitutional law; Jurisprudence; State (computer science); Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Human rights; Constitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.024448892214476513,"score_gpt":0.2917098771888187,"score_spread":0.2672609849743422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269871599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8938738,0.0042569772,0.002315062,0.010283768,0.004695195,0.00038774378,0.00006265226,0.000015102824,0.0841097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976413,0.00033064806,0.000106281965,0.00009006076,0.00095999334,8.398931e-7,3.3844077e-7,0.0000076256597,0.0008628662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842995,0.00017154594,0.00046745047,0.000087022425,0.00048508876,0.00035896787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983406,0.000166655,0.0005315504,0.00014491648,0.00043468684,0.00038156498],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010064963,0.00008507231,0.00023568858,0.000066452834,0.0009178785,0.000063567306,0.0007670622,0.00011371208,0.00024177799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013222356,0.000058296442,0.00015768112,0.0001895323,0.008928969,0.00034429837,0.000013435907,0.00020011324,0.000005251024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004585506,0.000028379167,0.006720686,0.000010888108,0.000033765085,0.00009176857,0.02314164,0.0000064113274,0.002184171,0.95905775,0.006129056,0.0025496043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053392927,0.00014080375,0.006027742,0.00025305492,0.000047620535,0.000032010103,0.0032701588,0.0000051572442,0.0023207413,0.013905354,0.97325647,0.00020694906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015863527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11228226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96712744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000993272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012373239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99376816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270196483","doi":"","title":"Racial and Ethnic Profiling: Statutory Discretion, Democratic Accountability and Constitutional Remedies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Racial profiling; Statutory law; Statute; Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Law; Accountability; Supreme court; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.028475146932812282,"score_gpt":0.3006014576285891,"score_spread":0.2721263106957768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270196483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8920019,0.010985322,0.09259325,0.001246931,0.00056291936,0.0003260971,0.000007737734,0.000061036306,0.0022147933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792746,0.01830731,0.00012750199,0.00006411343,0.00065114675,0.000005096389,0.0000029313314,0.0000054999464,0.0015618306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977586,0.00021650287,0.00025052793,0.0002062517,0.00042772238,0.0011403951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999391,0.00011690491,0.0001129907,0.000074996635,0.00015129693,0.00015279697],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002265114,0.000117062365,0.00017854689,0.00005591039,0.0019545788,0.00005298014,0.00012346118,0.00010699795,0.0000409698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017549635,0.000094555966,0.00004812832,0.0001248452,0.03295346,0.00049156835,0.000020822616,0.0008567506,0.0000037274065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035548495,0.00003097652,0.012454429,0.000005111234,0.00003764361,0.0000030555796,0.005121122,9.3441514e-7,0.00006507462,0.9791821,0.000053042964,0.003010934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009932176,0.0002144623,0.0026563285,0.000019777246,0.000055222845,0.00046069795,0.012758705,0.000051456573,0.000034596214,0.9772555,0.0052034943,0.0002965282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007999861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026491932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09246575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005045883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004760833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276879045","doi":"","title":"Representation Reinforcement through Advisory Commissions: The Case of Election Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Election law; Law; Commission; Legislature; Referendum; Statute; Democracy; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Economics","score_opus":0.022775179722832262,"score_gpt":0.32209730137956794,"score_spread":0.29932212165673566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276879045","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12896132,0.015196589,0.45549238,0.04911563,0.001987984,0.0017589116,0.0000048297784,0.00023295727,0.3472494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98695636,0.0055650566,0.00008660725,0.00021981153,0.00083563826,0.000005498138,0.0000015261662,0.000007872403,0.0063216607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980439,0.00029262752,0.0003112884,0.00011170791,0.00029893225,0.00094152184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931574,0.0001037395,0.00023244887,0.0001652477,0.00012731763,0.000055492852],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019904047,0.00008064614,0.00011682805,0.000032020715,0.0015165001,0.000053403164,0.00022241265,0.00006936653,0.00014317103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007445668,0.000053336822,0.000110719375,0.0002446919,0.0017121586,0.00051219674,0.000017788367,0.0006869502,0.000013725256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024157041,0.000035082103,0.00002577169,0.0000011648453,0.000046644444,0.000004810033,0.0056891907,0.00019944862,0.000070369315,0.9786075,0.000574742,0.014721171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074097555,0.00024610723,0.000006877375,0.00001828618,0.000070265036,0.0008656941,0.038751815,0.0002550861,0.0008542533,0.7492856,0.20875268,0.00015238534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004417779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03243335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85799503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006870467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090561167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277668868","doi":"10.3138/9781442682337-017","title":"Is Privacy a Casualty of the War on Terrorism?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Internet privacy; Information privacy; Accountability; Government (linguistics); Privacy by Design; Face (sociological concept); Computer security; Privacy policy; Personally identifiable information; Business; Political science; Computer science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.03968678878748014,"score_gpt":0.24353747702854148,"score_spread":0.20385068824106134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277668868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000098953125,0.00041339977,0.00009300231,0.000083065715,0.00033561958,0.00037529293,0.00009385325,0.000029282995,0.9984775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007722992,0.00073643954,0.00004056495,0.000046269884,0.00016200388,1.2363319e-7,0.0000020320772,0.000014594749,0.99127495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872977,0.00006477236,0.00015784027,0.00027071388,0.00056789693,0.00020903289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987783,0.000056994508,0.0003678771,0.0005544346,0.00014352179,0.000098889905],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014407997,0.00018367851,0.0003376094,0.000017415468,0.00038968536,0.0000075335165,0.0010184458,0.00036541538,0.0010099539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009477525,0.00015768505,0.00031838828,0.0000015908603,0.005727279,0.00009054243,0.00021833365,0.00016705964,0.0000060659036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006976983,0.0000291247,0.000014518544,0.000035486948,0.00012878697,0.000013158302,0.096411,6.0283315e-7,0.0000064025326,0.88504833,0.015042519,0.0032003263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031883622,0.00005378413,0.000017379325,0.00015121784,0.00011999535,4.01028e-7,0.00055215665,0.0000018773045,0.000067319015,0.0038865765,0.9946514,0.00017909541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15194407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057209753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97960883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031115027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017460748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279239915","doi":"","title":"Clearly Canadian--Hill v. Colorado and Free Speech Balancing in the United States and Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings constitutional law quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Political science; Gerontology; Audiology; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.011001466962115729,"score_gpt":0.21750728369628577,"score_spread":0.20650581673417004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279239915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93252116,0.00015609764,0.0008091551,0.012535029,0.00034331158,0.0003587111,0.00016142998,0.000039042654,0.05307605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971275,0.000027327269,0.000117738164,0.0023770072,0.00014505525,0.0000068054605,0.0000307595,0.0000038890194,0.00016397345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986618,0.00016797463,0.0001992653,0.0002097248,0.0003460622,0.00041518421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990393,0.0004383138,0.00005551617,0.00011040455,0.00011088803,0.0002455962],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075395324,0.00011442418,0.00013152383,0.00007897663,0.0011711634,0.0002162899,0.00021554943,0.00007426944,0.000056358753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012649741,0.000092446535,0.000015232665,0.0002601298,0.010508966,0.00023119304,0.000009462503,0.0001756383,0.0000032589378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070150736,0.000008594668,0.011893548,0.0000034288066,0.0000063934162,0.00014396459,0.0043820343,0.000008222272,0.0000038568883,0.98133993,0.0017188676,0.00048415174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010185476,0.00013180835,0.0073604966,0.00008027528,0.000023375174,0.00020708928,0.018952642,0.0005348122,0.0000017700213,0.04764282,0.92365134,0.00039500883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99657553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9336971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021017282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013516007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99218386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279397834","doi":"10.55016/ojs/ajer.v46i1.54798","title":"The Internet and the First Amendment: Schools and Sexually Explicit Expression by Fred H.Cate","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Journal of Educational Research","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Psychology; Amendment; Expression (computer science); First amendment; Freedom of expression; Mathematics education; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.038967842164847825,"score_gpt":0.3636677783788371,"score_spread":0.3246999362139893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279397834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7531264,0.0060184924,0.000013011555,0.1923379,0.00025407688,0.00032180783,0.0000028966242,8.553223e-7,0.047924552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8628426,0.0054637776,0.000018794402,0.00020929346,0.0005275159,0.000019465753,0.0000015470537,0.000006504718,0.13091049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981345,0.0004486963,0.00026231614,0.0001279918,0.00073277956,0.00029374516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98852795,0.0108095575,0.00009943241,0.0001281843,0.00023948603,0.00019538331],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024013515,0.00006903363,0.00010997393,0.000049520295,0.0014502673,0.0004420067,0.00050181616,0.000048822978,0.0034449333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017904087,0.000034578603,0.000035215067,0.00015523165,0.0044685276,0.00031471517,0.000052808184,0.00036438057,0.000056920457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048103623,0.00015922936,0.007697049,0.000008793317,0.00007565303,4.792059e-7,0.031475797,0.000001462148,0.00020756696,0.5555641,0.3992424,0.0050864457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094463135,0.000093766204,0.0011627369,0.00008162104,0.0000115489165,0.000015430227,0.0054030903,0.000016661383,0.00013971732,0.029166238,0.96288055,0.00008400039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00251749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023145322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56363815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007220457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035528562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281236282","doi":"","title":"Policy in the Lives of Marginalized Girls: Mapping the Disjunctures","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Interpretation (philosophy); Enforcement; Government (linguistics); Political science; Judicial interpretation; Corporate governance; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.019146408138844273,"score_gpt":0.2840177241725991,"score_spread":0.2648713160337548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281236282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52442926,0.045914147,0.031837285,0.18747315,0.0009952262,0.0016576354,0.000006185107,0.000112625545,0.2075745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897683,0.0071030534,0.000017348819,0.00060769985,0.0009505793,0.0000021533945,3.8384465e-7,0.000004487052,0.0015459502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736035,0.0005115301,0.00023682012,0.00009795804,0.00043382403,0.0013595037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999455,0.00015876882,0.00015601961,0.00015031936,0.000041234664,0.000038672235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037315553,0.000096278294,0.00015173426,0.000105274165,0.0006365473,0.00009010069,0.00076301483,0.0000520478,0.000028644332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017502437,0.000045165132,0.00012966627,0.00049015274,0.0018508326,0.00015194034,0.0000116505435,0.0009028272,0.0000043491927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001767937,0.000038591657,0.00051132165,0.0000010242234,0.000020790816,0.0000019244633,0.029296357,0.0000056158106,0.000043425673,0.95632166,0.00010914126,0.013632444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035168033,0.0001060141,0.0021330598,0.000015546546,0.000012932671,0.00004172982,0.038506363,0.000006556744,0.000008205616,0.9459834,0.01275669,0.000077786055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007910806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005084178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4653391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029346725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016874287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.681947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282359210","doi":"","title":"Keeping Pace: The U.S. Supreme Court and Evolving Technology","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - Ursinus (Ursinus College)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Law; Mainstream; Political science; Pace; Government (linguistics); The Internet; Notice; Sociology; Internet privacy; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.028175080682100558,"score_gpt":0.2663652058654589,"score_spread":0.23819012518335836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282359210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23870148,0.007079927,0.002774209,0.071413256,0.003168449,0.0019339998,0.0003688617,0.001202647,0.6733572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938161,0.000030466115,0.0001624966,0.0002312192,0.00038279654,0.000029286504,0.000015104951,0.00004002458,0.0052925064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972608,0.00018618008,0.000386167,0.00048345616,0.00073905004,0.00094434444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979635,0.00039158578,0.00015387332,0.00062730827,0.0003843752,0.00047936267],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008207582,0.0003041525,0.0004439056,0.0002565683,0.0017969126,0.00069667504,0.00083687954,0.00033817664,0.000034587818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005593353,0.00024599655,0.00011854497,0.0012409277,0.015269549,0.001055497,0.00023918663,0.00042611186,0.00008509396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076963275,0.00023736092,0.015616004,0.000011478496,0.00008438202,0.00009388595,0.011226378,0.000006190601,0.000011497815,0.855909,0.10653067,0.010196213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018917087,0.00040112136,0.0017190396,0.00016178632,0.00010438401,0.00017576142,0.044760615,0.00037643092,0.000041224455,0.14080203,0.8086215,0.0009443538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034741103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001363204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7551146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044722267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057486363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282413001","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195372472.003.0014","title":"Identity Cards and Identity Romanticism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"National identity; Exceptionalism; Political science; Romance; Identity (music); Comity; Law; Media studies; Sociology; Politics; Aesthetics; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.030493024570466064,"score_gpt":0.29188548099297384,"score_spread":0.2613924564225078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282413001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023096685,0.0015407898,0.004072307,0.00020269178,0.001249648,0.000255548,0.000019497003,0.00014384124,0.9922847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015426048,0.011041658,0.00012246084,0.0001742166,0.0012009464,0.0000024672875,0.000009052962,0.000028015933,0.9719951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807024,0.00003561534,0.00026679022,0.00040317007,0.00091025315,0.0003139188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918693,0.000053467484,0.00012840482,0.00028163512,0.00013672371,0.00021281687],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042750672,0.00022767083,0.00039631626,0.00009884601,0.0008652997,0.00024460122,0.00040293633,0.0004957635,0.002305028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036948117,0.00020154157,0.00018714975,0.000039365776,0.011485398,0.0009910127,0.00014453122,0.00024528173,0.00043675734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001561557,0.0000071789614,0.000093960814,0.00001180341,0.000044050274,0.000049021448,0.0015261007,2.7723033e-8,8.0319865e-7,0.9812298,0.016463215,0.0005725158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013039466,0.000013837524,0.00015521195,0.00002588795,0.00006500533,0.000006291396,0.000086357366,9.3047817e-7,0.0000015554706,0.33400768,0.6652151,0.00029174672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040518832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024766978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64875185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000101956844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017711591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282775516","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2083825","title":"Finding Milton’s Meaning -- Campaign Finance and Free Expression in Comparative Perspective: The United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Kingdom; Perspective (graphical); Campaign finance; Political science; Public administration; Economic history; Law; Economics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.030130104664696112,"score_gpt":0.29069383763889267,"score_spread":0.26056373297419655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282775516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904586,0.003984231,0.0017582161,0.002754887,0.00019102245,0.00019792237,0.0000053079143,0.000009864794,0.0006399192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957771,0.0033986897,0.00002486424,0.00017810038,0.0002595338,0.0000049535797,0.0000032623652,0.000008612067,0.00034491712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723816,0.0006182118,0.00018063678,0.00013961633,0.0003540983,0.0014692618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999075,0.00043933338,0.00015954256,0.00012995664,0.00010431132,0.00009188995],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002504814,0.00013393039,0.0001571548,0.000099986166,0.0018544665,0.000111609996,0.00035445913,0.00005672799,0.0000102984795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013186196,0.000074885895,0.000022865135,0.0004520173,0.001650213,0.000272842,0.00006063007,0.0012211485,3.910478e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028428054,0.000017678165,0.010526119,0.0000013090672,0.000031934,0.0000021531444,0.06889435,0.00011779977,0.000028375413,0.9195603,0.0006994402,0.000092095266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016361007,0.0001283584,0.0057772836,0.00013361977,0.000056634995,0.00011036241,0.6424791,0.00092564576,0.00011866766,0.2553588,0.092831016,0.000444381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6402679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9135896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6642015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014795194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014675744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283415456","doi":"","title":"Advertising and the Charter: Just Do It? An Analysis of the Constitutional Recognition of Commercial Expression","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Jurisprudence; Expression (computer science); Constitutional law; Political science; Politics; Marketplace of ideas; Sociology; First amendment; Computer science","score_opus":0.0467082171192189,"score_gpt":0.32601063120417223,"score_spread":0.2793024140849533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283415456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98952186,0.0023731913,0.00031234132,0.0028384249,0.0003720462,0.00012030885,0.000034944325,0.000004468277,0.00442244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968497,0.002589631,0.000060872906,0.00013976742,0.0002607782,0.0000010448767,9.789079e-7,0.000002266112,0.00009491916],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846596,0.00039044904,0.0004484866,0.00007921453,0.00049970095,0.00011622028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988555,0.00025464105,0.00041480194,0.00009141761,0.00034065222,0.00004304007],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011529927,0.00007696602,0.00039061246,0.000075270065,0.00079005904,0.000036346177,0.00020252979,0.000043498298,0.000119656914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014855756,0.000037705027,0.00020298103,0.00030803846,0.014710327,0.00036543782,0.000032854696,0.00012916887,4.8371356e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027267025,0.00096448045,0.054633606,0.00010224488,0.006636917,0.00003079219,0.4370299,0.0009322089,0.0018218479,0.36470082,0.0061312746,0.1242892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02703203,0.0018313376,0.22487782,0.0041928794,0.027238939,0.00020255863,0.39779556,0.0008003699,0.0080148075,0.064013265,0.24201143,0.0019889954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021362728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007745712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30068755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003140863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008600326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98797107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283748176","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-057-4-199","title":"Reduction to Absurdity: Reasonable Expectations of Privacy and the Need for Digital Enlightenment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IOS Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Absurdity; Enlightenment; Reduction (mathematics); Internet privacy; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.040023635971382074,"score_gpt":0.27192085031930324,"score_spread":0.23189721434792115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283748176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021534,0.0013237421,0.0015206742,0.0004037996,0.000618961,0.0020915112,0.00012800399,0.000052454958,0.9936455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12300539,0.00016235502,0.00032276206,0.000027891794,0.0014118872,0.00023834145,0.000019375999,0.000036550835,0.87477547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894184,0.000027238651,0.00024732604,0.00021968264,0.00033963815,0.00022426444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991027,0.00017414097,0.00019332908,0.0002722491,0.00013629123,0.00012129871],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025884906,0.00015327896,0.0002730033,0.000044481407,0.00037090672,0.0001190164,0.00022575361,0.00016574585,0.00002183923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005160033,0.00010743174,0.00012655651,0.0000058057067,0.0032090205,0.00013239356,0.000077837176,0.000086907756,0.000005362568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006836068,0.000010435605,8.130785e-7,0.000020082742,0.000064831955,2.5586561e-7,0.027986286,2.6764786e-7,0.0000140239545,0.95518404,0.002134034,0.014516581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046941979,0.000034078806,0.000001025215,0.000062532665,0.00010495811,0.0000019708482,0.0009791487,0.0000020201835,0.00024707508,0.111012235,0.8869182,0.00016735384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002237093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003073707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88478416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053507236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000703856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294065045","doi":"","title":"Rethinking the Bona Fides of Entrapment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Fides; Entrapment; Charter; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.029172024033584994,"score_gpt":0.2532432732293926,"score_spread":0.22407124919580762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294065045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6529228,0.02668268,0.078928135,0.009551952,0.00334771,0.00086191675,0.00000412543,0.00016482837,0.22753581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991254,0.0056431512,0.00008502988,0.00007864807,0.0003964848,0.0000015929647,2.0128334e-7,0.000006593224,0.0025342985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786586,0.0001841261,0.00020847468,0.00008924586,0.00039258352,0.0012597241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995273,0.00006275194,0.00016641706,0.0001132886,0.00007237479,0.000057874022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034876782,0.00006877589,0.000105906234,0.000034057706,0.000691914,0.00003154648,0.0004577767,0.000059882143,0.00021914682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057288635,0.000041620544,0.0001076766,0.00012110139,0.002424389,0.00014902465,0.000019741374,0.00073744316,0.000011072661],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012101542,0.000028837716,0.0009928718,9.634884e-7,0.000055282748,0.0000010911132,0.03409691,3.7924963e-7,0.000039258168,0.9588721,0.000107794025,0.005792441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001628565,0.00009732019,0.00018475362,0.000011780953,0.000024314659,0.000019221587,0.010046367,0.000002305012,0.00024592053,0.97906613,0.010072317,0.00006672019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064377073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004359454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33833116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032752714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015279141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89327615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296731385","doi":"","title":"Democracy Divided: Campaign Finance Regulation and the Right to Vote","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Democracy; Political science; Contingent vote; Campaign finance; Spoilt vote; Position (finance); Economic Justice; Law; Law and economics; Group voting ticket; Business; Economics; Politics; Finance","score_opus":0.011737919120823267,"score_gpt":0.2873316361146372,"score_spread":0.2755937169938139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296731385","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31831336,0.0004896853,0.33549672,0.13632804,0.0016472079,0.0011925439,0.0000025153347,0.00025001675,0.20627992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94926167,0.000039960963,0.00054902304,0.0005480092,0.0004307492,0.0000075336297,5.696631e-7,0.0000053100075,0.0491572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914986,0.00020699466,0.00008217977,0.00015363072,0.00020903026,0.00019830489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993793,0.00027503943,0.000049907645,0.00018637074,0.000042503645,0.00006688207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009037652,0.00006409715,0.00010792036,0.000018318218,0.00076526287,0.000079933874,0.00016107851,0.000050287676,0.00003808832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023032652,0.00003915605,0.000028096936,0.0001495679,0.0026166292,0.00011484039,0.00003133252,0.000054195847,0.000047865247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016239565,0.000005268897,0.000375488,0.0000018795595,0.000003004247,3.152047e-7,0.023352968,0.00001940262,0.000029970532,0.9629174,0.009095805,0.004182254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052244315,0.000023204984,0.0041805264,0.0000164017,0.00001463275,6.6582135e-7,0.0006151386,0.0004953156,0.0001615502,0.2166089,0.77722466,0.00013657454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001223109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002809983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7681289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023976176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002601579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96410793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297796997","doi":"","title":"When Free Expression Gets Expensive: Legalities, Liabilities, and Realities","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Freedom of expression; Democracy; Surrender; Expression (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Population; Human rights; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.01801150477633764,"score_gpt":0.25239159907720077,"score_spread":0.23438009430086312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297796997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7920272,0.07431038,0.015048734,0.013312386,0.0026527948,0.00086865947,0.000047762518,0.00045519279,0.1012769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8645875,0.046435714,0.00022352296,0.00021866373,0.0018797077,0.000011261608,0.0000046861664,0.000029404977,0.086609535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996093,0.0003890155,0.00033336654,0.00026751382,0.0006382539,0.0022788583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897814,0.00017514545,0.00015577814,0.00028293912,0.0001744178,0.0002335797],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016965257,0.00018782208,0.0002722213,0.00009416506,0.0020664893,0.00013496757,0.00048051827,0.00016648191,0.00017343924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000293892,0.0001549053,0.00011023559,0.0000666778,0.0062421947,0.00077967165,0.00008312241,0.0010127226,0.000009561089],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035083965,0.00003196254,0.0009056317,0.000005851443,0.000035846497,0.000018359593,0.044307426,5.845328e-7,0.00006587232,0.9451958,0.0080651045,0.0013324871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059390086,0.00013690886,0.00006441807,0.000029058352,0.0000134388565,0.00022475795,0.05250837,0.0000015932502,0.00013361109,0.74431366,0.20175813,0.00022212944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034833031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008294642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2008821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082417997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031921284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298758775","doi":"","title":"Communication Surveillance in Korea","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Warrant; Suspect; Probable cause; Search and seizure; Law; Supreme court; Doctrine; Political science; Expectation of privacy; Electronic surveillance; Business","score_opus":0.008682010162946568,"score_gpt":0.2595224562615953,"score_spread":0.25084044609864875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298758775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54834354,0.012228099,0.15691382,0.022885647,0.0012754835,0.00053986633,0.0000025172833,0.00021812123,0.2575929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98846066,0.008594653,0.000051340918,0.00007911509,0.00032709117,0.0000020926977,0.0000016876171,0.0000071992317,0.0024761548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997686,0.00054437417,0.0001779652,0.00009365943,0.00023678086,0.0012611675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994887,0.00012186986,0.00009797767,0.00016951904,0.000059893955,0.00006201829],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005561375,0.00006244126,0.000115373776,0.000059230075,0.00046638047,0.00006362831,0.00043824618,0.00007034076,0.0000388457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015761398,0.00005391316,0.00004702698,0.00019038808,0.001390118,0.00019095681,0.000018009108,0.00083600316,0.00003688363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063010784,0.000023569708,0.012055139,5.234521e-7,0.0000070111887,2.1020425e-7,0.0012854924,0.0000059667027,0.000008447097,0.97299916,0.000087841436,0.013520366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004440842,0.000054616754,0.0021528404,0.00000926333,0.0000027151632,0.000011614638,0.0020989934,0.00006586306,0.0000047346107,0.93014896,0.06489467,0.00011165166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009504916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084066264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44011712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064198516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087537826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93264717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2300714839","doi":"","title":"Improving Privacy Protection, But by How Much?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Core (optical fiber); Internet privacy; Personally identifiable information; Economic Justice; Public domain; Information privacy; Data Protection Act 1998; Law and economics; Privacy policy; Political science; Computer security; Business; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.022343779163110665,"score_gpt":0.24067192027568624,"score_spread":0.21832814111257556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2300714839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76873225,0.0024473788,0.080075905,0.019629374,0.0048528155,0.003636212,0.000092794835,0.0022087076,0.11832454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94165677,0.00011773804,0.00071045157,0.00043845107,0.0014318089,0.00007832298,0.000007346526,0.000028005266,0.05553113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799997,0.00018449455,0.00021204115,0.00042088836,0.0005823761,0.00060023915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989073,0.00004780785,0.0001376667,0.0003790789,0.00015794525,0.00037019773],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044475938,0.00018101657,0.00021780918,0.0000411538,0.0021779833,0.00023238268,0.0004937016,0.00021225486,0.0004693885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032475538,0.00016255773,0.00011639608,0.00029052774,0.00459716,0.0008583592,0.00007089718,0.0003246975,0.00037784223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039521223,0.00025250716,0.0034333125,0.000046188652,0.000060997463,0.000059314247,0.007880911,0.0000017896223,0.014681077,0.88019615,0.08799619,0.0053520473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006442153,0.00008220038,0.00014038806,0.000017555274,0.0000151576105,0.0000122995025,0.0009266555,0.000029181148,0.005741634,0.009213077,0.98276806,0.0004095753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011878207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020121143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8947719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001824025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024914223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301249481","doi":"","title":"The Antidomination Model and the Judicial Oversight of Democracy","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Andrew W. Mellon Foundation","keywords":"Gerrymandering; Democracy; Supreme court; Adjudication; Political science; Judicial review; Law and economics; Law; Harm; Normative; Power (physics); Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.016226723851363416,"score_gpt":0.23723591486988468,"score_spread":0.22100919101852126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301249481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.584345,0.0014643099,0.017237948,0.015354978,0.000287452,0.00046119269,0.00000897934,0.000039148294,0.38080102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98852205,0.0032630959,0.00023385414,0.00001453066,0.00004331789,4.9933846e-8,4.2756e-7,0.0000020150924,0.007920677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939233,0.000107547196,0.000049819635,0.00008459743,0.0002473466,0.00011836432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994618,0.00017635364,0.00011613923,0.00011552984,0.00009190136,0.000038257458],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035417068,0.000045287077,0.00011860334,0.000009190147,0.001568195,0.0000065250206,0.00024555548,0.000052174015,0.00029762374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038224684,0.000032641656,0.000064338885,0.000042526513,0.011092321,0.00035074513,0.00005252856,0.000039183262,0.000001522612],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019293868,0.000023134891,0.00039189626,0.0000034917487,0.000029680885,0.0000017785493,0.13159093,0.000022571316,0.00007335256,0.8615177,0.0017680724,0.0043844515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02198385,0.00043771355,0.20060016,0.000108400774,0.00077040424,0.000011525497,0.54481465,0.06474997,0.00034708585,0.10474131,0.060255907,0.0011789997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07749494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071415365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7567764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067152665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009391196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2306256110","doi":"","title":"The Anti-Discrimination Norm in Human Rights and Charter Law: Nixon V. Vancouver Rape Relief","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Meaning (existential); Charter; Law; Norm (philosophy); Political science; Transsexual; International human rights law; Sociology; Gender studies; Transgender; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01223796314377971,"score_gpt":0.26359476700878476,"score_spread":0.25135680386500503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2306256110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30397126,0.000114386254,0.0009194341,0.0022798025,0.0008830336,0.0004164505,0.0000014791268,0.00009910236,0.69131505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98661655,0.000044529144,0.000050880895,0.00020013383,0.00022397126,0.0000070577535,0.0000016425246,0.0000041340095,0.0128511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991455,0.00005189328,0.00015018474,0.00017018497,0.00023848527,0.00024373506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996955,0.000042267064,0.000039409548,0.00012465483,0.000040825966,0.00005737731],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038636546,0.000076742435,0.000092021684,0.00003301309,0.001309933,0.00010934163,0.0001436648,0.00008022565,0.0000866768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000066352904,0.00004425155,0.000028506212,0.00010357492,0.0030886915,0.00035798294,0.000019414716,0.00007908517,0.0000195543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023189998,0.000039998395,0.00018981955,0.0000021427818,0.000002949655,0.0000027300814,0.0072734193,0.0000010376438,0.000072537754,0.9898976,0.002186566,0.00032889767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001117198,0.00006756337,0.0027653142,0.000022075503,0.000011661944,5.8436694e-7,0.0017766316,0.000011954277,0.000919715,0.66559833,0.32748517,0.00022380604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01334667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48339635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68264526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007115398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022769933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2307093205","doi":"","title":"Preface: Privacy Revisited: A Global Perspective on the Right to Be Left Alone","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Right to privacy; Privacy law; Political science; The Right to Privacy; Personally identifiable information; Privacy policy; Information privacy; Framing (construction); Data Protection Act 1998; Fundamental rights; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights; Engineering","score_opus":0.0142176631653727,"score_gpt":0.29294799837563834,"score_spread":0.27873033521026563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2307093205","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19694975,0.00462291,0.05764298,0.541646,0.0013438119,0.0016839766,0.00005414847,0.00026914425,0.1957873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97703755,0.0025647276,0.00003315057,0.0012446485,0.0013548534,0.0000054282327,3.5564005e-7,0.0000148711515,0.017744422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99603873,0.0004078438,0.00022745422,0.0003092394,0.00074010727,0.0022765964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891025,0.00017951117,0.00013805063,0.00029629382,0.00023912889,0.00023677333],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002646078,0.0001772031,0.00020751436,0.00005310845,0.0013097967,0.0001536293,0.0008544204,0.00010647536,0.00062599295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005208982,0.00008514174,0.00017092425,0.0003026155,0.0017045973,0.00028458302,0.000057947676,0.0007155943,0.00030147098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060639817,0.00005134943,0.0002988366,4.947637e-7,0.00009273799,0.000004110672,0.0041077114,4.9273024e-7,0.00007765739,0.98898447,0.0040674745,0.0022540456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005043663,0.00035304742,0.00015133173,0.000043019263,0.00003181518,0.00006021466,0.0060584415,6.2624844e-7,0.00008786232,0.7739619,0.21855289,0.00019449079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029391004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058226064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78008777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054201703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023680485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315603950","doi":"","title":"Ethics in the Cultural and Educational Industries","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Ethics","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Happiness; Sociology; Law and economics; Paternalism; Argument (complex analysis); Social psychology; Law; Positive economics; Psychology; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.1707345475682381,"score_gpt":0.42872960149678097,"score_spread":0.25799505392854283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315603950","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16986409,0.0002606632,0.0027725708,0.7503424,0.0022908414,0.00022048525,0.0000083253,0.000008344942,0.07423223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99554664,0.001190833,0.00022706558,0.0023278021,0.00049838127,8.806042e-7,0.000001633532,0.0000010085296,0.00020575615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987669,0.0001977671,0.00029509448,0.000019762298,0.00063059037,0.00008987286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978964,0.0007822733,0.00053855195,0.00008302412,0.00065543153,0.000044373064],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00588396,0.00003985577,0.00007006432,0.00005419602,0.0015296303,0.0006321736,0.00036615814,0.00027097878,0.000024577916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008426838,0.000023287894,0.000024613519,0.000060498274,0.004138518,0.0033295723,0.000018468194,0.0015059132,0.000006032687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043659443,0.000006441556,0.002937956,0.000007101046,0.0000033269375,2.9592255e-7,0.24811167,0.0000050349922,4.290005e-7,0.7449265,0.0026906598,0.0013062389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059632625,0.0000540837,0.042529646,0.00012627926,0.000015509677,0.000038277183,0.12638733,0.00002468256,0.00001908301,0.1097875,0.7202955,0.00012582011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017741123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037511878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8256825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042242897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011033013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321269879","doi":"10.7202/1035388ar","title":"R. v. Spencer: Anonymity, the Rule of Law, and the Shrivelling of the Biographical Core","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Anonymity; Law; Charter; Jurisprudence; Political science; Possession (linguistics); The Internet; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03204187655207375,"score_gpt":0.26880271401588235,"score_spread":0.2367608374638086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321269879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22721644,0.002197536,0.002288391,0.055278465,0.0030640883,0.0010464917,0.00017027794,0.00004564042,0.70869267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981003,0.0011315566,0.00005019851,0.00030056437,0.00026554507,0.0000012227612,5.887028e-8,0.000005282712,0.00014530965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862283,0.0003069728,0.00027011297,0.000096456875,0.00048615696,0.0002174827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988321,0.0005201217,0.00025108625,0.00019362886,0.00013063931,0.00007243251],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017285023,0.000077254284,0.0001724159,0.000017900962,0.0036005008,0.000040556697,0.0006220261,0.00007090468,0.00015675838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007046931,0.000024090952,0.00019174331,0.0001688981,0.029292779,0.00013530366,0.000090783855,0.00018286936,0.0000022711042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000314981,0.000018735333,0.0014011787,0.000002044872,0.00002906055,0.000001176433,0.0010650016,9.2398335e-7,0.00014297882,0.996226,0.0000762483,0.00100516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016372044,0.000059203685,0.0010092035,0.00014220743,0.0000918108,0.00004302123,0.0010934114,0.00001628586,0.0016866288,0.44854668,0.5455422,0.00013214842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019145439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077945767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77088386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015614029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016911185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322645813","doi":"10.1177/1462474510383461","title":"Book Review: Wayne A. Logan, Knowledge as Power: Criminal Registration and Community Notification Laws in America, Stanford Law Books: Stanford CA, 2009; 288 pp. (including index): 9780804761369 (pbk)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Punishment & Society","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Law; Criminology; Power (physics); Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.030266164261070833,"score_gpt":0.31951496057491574,"score_spread":0.2892487963138449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322645813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16562477,0.27592874,0.010954358,0.042238876,0.0051665343,0.010416451,0.0004186737,0.0012304705,0.4880211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85828114,0.11195904,0.001093499,0.01310872,0.00047147705,0.00019513076,0.00024757508,0.000057464516,0.014585948],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970013,0.0005741091,0.0006863116,0.0004271181,0.0006681526,0.00064301223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998036,0.00029574885,0.0004208055,0.0006578602,0.00030568292,0.000283849],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00318997,0.0003116169,0.0004595178,0.000034531007,0.002302182,0.0002663733,0.00058094534,0.00030808744,0.0005458355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020648233,0.00030090517,0.00019603671,0.0003724459,0.0064664218,0.0009830032,0.00017018548,0.0012499347,0.0000555853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058825262,0.00088414765,0.0013788351,0.0006018737,0.00008375277,0.0000054597663,0.1216397,0.000001611801,0.0010630202,0.2727135,0.5948407,0.00672853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056192453,0.0001321675,0.00041318138,0.00022449589,0.00007132631,0.0000025877214,0.015987648,0.000075540396,0.00016398635,0.0028900316,0.97908777,0.00038936673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007176706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019779418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6926564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004717603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037222533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327950701","doi":"10.1515/1540-8884.1440","title":"The End of the Reform Era? Campaign Finance Retrenchment in the United States and Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forum","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Repeal; Retrenchment; Deregulation; Political science; Politics; Public administration; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.009858362350397196,"score_gpt":0.23027817057968067,"score_spread":0.22041980822928348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327950701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9293602,0.0011357798,0.000016118807,0.045496587,0.00062951026,0.00040774033,0.00002736102,0.0000075629323,0.02291913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99657816,0.0006070379,0.0000033980336,0.00073166256,0.00007774518,0.000010502437,0.00000197982,0.000002787186,0.0019867555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893475,0.00021826655,0.00012249974,0.00005761046,0.00031279176,0.00035408937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931127,0.00028861305,0.000080213955,0.00027048343,0.000024468545,0.000024923904],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012422388,0.000060684855,0.00006730311,0.0000089211535,0.0009834892,0.000029056424,0.0005093203,0.000027055452,0.000013483571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039048344,0.000019643108,0.00002164967,0.00022967637,0.0033274132,0.000067273904,0.000057579964,0.00012123063,8.5417383e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000984829,0.00001878077,0.011768378,0.0000025584282,0.000009504743,3.503166e-7,0.03990774,0.000008522992,0.000003786943,0.9341616,0.012589862,0.0015190808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016452406,0.00002706228,0.021837529,0.00001894041,0.000012306729,0.000001204311,0.066757455,0.00005287001,0.00018358791,0.033427484,0.8774279,0.0000891377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80838484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95531017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9007341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012433356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017158779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332434379","doi":"","title":"Tuning in to Democracy: Community Radio, Free Speech and the Democratic Promise","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternate routes","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Free speech; Political science; Community radio; Sociology; Political economy; Media studies; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02181925699827339,"score_gpt":0.27596754218923747,"score_spread":0.2541482851909641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332434379","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9721131,0.0002885799,0.0019867616,0.013277762,0.000258081,0.0005656176,0.000003766984,0.00006773342,0.011438602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966167,0.00019765775,0.001300078,0.0006037827,0.00020195088,0.00001878886,0.0000013500054,0.000011721048,0.0010479727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985628,0.00046674765,0.00021231011,0.00015442216,0.0002607893,0.00034292493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989813,0.00040413626,0.000063668536,0.00037873694,0.00003774801,0.00013440727],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015540813,0.00011726052,0.00021006551,0.000060205224,0.0009848806,0.00016439607,0.0007490015,0.00005619716,0.000019029876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046957633,0.00007929269,0.000042231837,0.00022980888,0.0030715722,0.000260778,0.00017981755,0.00029067977,0.000022790357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009342122,0.00012183235,0.023369076,0.000019673944,0.000044839722,0.0000533583,0.10408495,0.0001194878,0.00026044747,0.8636889,0.00035806553,0.007785958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003862533,0.00005839068,0.004031999,0.00011059492,0.000025979674,0.0000110189885,0.0038288515,0.00015402834,0.0004957859,0.9855398,0.0016331446,0.00024786673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026855368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025565406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121850915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010961805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082228624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336937760","doi":"","title":"Reviewing PIPEDA: Control, Privacy and the Limits of Fair Information Practices","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personally identifiable information; FTC Fair Information Practice; Entitlement (fair division); Privacy policy; Privacy by Design; Internet privacy; Information privacy law; Information privacy; Scope (computer science); Control (management); Business; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.024174206210570957,"score_gpt":0.2679656003852986,"score_spread":0.24379139417472764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336937760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16221985,0.008223363,0.025052676,0.023130564,0.00030104254,0.001125274,0.000015115662,0.00008858006,0.7798435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99591154,0.0020955426,0.00041918398,0.00003231635,0.00005054997,1.373317e-7,0.0000014875461,0.000001399934,0.0014878246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993696,0.00015571831,0.00008789298,0.00006398303,0.00021359131,0.00010921068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999018,0.0002014401,0.00050913094,0.00011681808,0.00012317457,0.000031414962],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006484113,0.000050150302,0.0001734931,0.000013340268,0.00036093293,0.000020895131,0.0002089787,0.000052009415,0.0004784508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015641774,0.000041229487,0.00005684466,0.000046531586,0.0028544061,0.0019958245,0.00003200493,0.000041087605,0.000003986615],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001716849,0.00003548836,0.001800564,0.000075805125,0.000043194726,9.201176e-7,0.10610951,0.0000060677444,0.000060235263,0.86669314,0.0015127513,0.023490649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008981275,0.00018522803,0.13014872,0.00020119648,0.0005514718,0.0000023200723,0.19520573,0.00061798224,0.000045282384,0.004187271,0.6594456,0.0004279005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22735915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0565016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86250585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006010803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006021666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346222212","doi":"","title":"The \"Inexorable Zero\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Phrase; Affirmative action; Law; Political science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Rest (music); Zero (linguistics); Law and economics; Action (physics); Sociology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics; Physics","score_opus":0.016929622553129905,"score_gpt":0.2621832436139102,"score_spread":0.2452536210607803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346222212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03479448,0.0030066504,0.009233207,0.018682819,0.003985607,0.00078493403,0.00001578137,0.0006248061,0.9288717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94824076,0.00040845684,0.0004476024,0.001168179,0.0012132914,0.00002762481,0.0000032845653,0.0000204431,0.048470344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838877,0.00011289473,0.00020023384,0.0002416577,0.0004849435,0.00057151663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990602,0.000120886805,0.00006854921,0.0003832289,0.00008978439,0.00027734495],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007699302,0.00012177456,0.00014075745,0.000016784694,0.0025204427,0.00037643054,0.0005997712,0.00012131421,0.0003955341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001522933,0.000080879574,0.00010367602,0.000255606,0.0062727137,0.0003948718,0.000049796614,0.0002193637,0.0016701161],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065230793,0.00002998016,0.00021526753,0.0000020041787,0.000011811466,0.000007486294,0.0009107068,0.000028333183,0.00004863968,0.9918276,0.006384346,0.00052729005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032847698,0.000022482907,0.000054301727,0.000011036796,0.000007829768,0.0000010210144,0.00044538907,0.0000013007574,0.0002215485,0.28341088,0.71537554,0.00012021261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078807445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018655084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9134463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015822187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002569779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2407744157","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2743","title":"Book Note: Brandishing The First Amendment, by Tamara Piety","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Piety; Amendment; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.00930279780565647,"score_gpt":0.24739074513833148,"score_spread":0.23808794733267502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2407744157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023937454,0.0028864779,0.052369118,0.02488874,0.0017208959,0.00022622698,0.000012165815,0.00009063593,0.91756636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810493,0.001168568,0.00017249805,0.007863208,0.0022969616,0.0000061603596,0.0000032268724,0.000022624772,0.007417427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997938,0.00028668798,0.00030507895,0.00020551127,0.00068975135,0.0005750198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894565,0.00024313095,0.00022461751,0.0002339025,0.00007909874,0.00027361026],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001803299,0.00015746514,0.00020059994,0.000018991163,0.0046170307,0.00079170614,0.0007378893,0.00013672136,0.0012414355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007333486,0.00010081718,0.00018058442,0.000102697464,0.003749544,0.00068834604,0.00005450661,0.0005135731,0.000119844284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011936411,0.00004569568,0.00022233198,0.000003573097,0.000023313889,0.000004404524,0.0035135427,0.000009842844,0.00004288569,0.8175543,0.17725174,0.0013164465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005805832,0.000044587327,0.000024641005,0.000031260857,0.000030068879,0.000020784682,0.00033135375,0.00006192955,0.00009899261,0.057171267,0.9414315,0.00017299877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008963056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057090607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9808099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001425126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061535204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2426990485","doi":"10.1017/s0898030616000178","title":"Deliberating Surveillance Policy: Congress, the FBI, and the Abuse of National Security Letters","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy History","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer security; National security; Criminology; Internet privacy; Public administration; Law; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01554753593477804,"score_gpt":0.27210805912199143,"score_spread":0.2565605231872134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2426990485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48871773,0.020672433,0.0024026826,0.3613355,0.004592102,0.0006487162,0.00008480182,0.000052224343,0.12149381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99220836,0.0011822548,0.000028525958,0.0026040357,0.0029159791,0.0000012796204,9.253191e-8,0.000006182493,0.0010532788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984465,0.00045222146,0.0003220843,0.00006679695,0.0005431488,0.00016923196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981129,0.000882749,0.00053520757,0.00009613533,0.00029642493,0.00007654192],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022392774,0.00006930459,0.00017916069,0.00009745194,0.0003085673,0.000019994493,0.0003215891,0.00004475073,0.000025517653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011730256,0.000030671985,0.00010497936,0.00010396803,0.011625328,0.00021695576,0.000018689572,0.00012326738,0.0000018536326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041502215,0.000017555461,0.0005152803,0.000004558716,0.000040877978,0.0000017438272,0.03630836,0.0000031042468,0.00043845506,0.91094244,0.05122115,0.00046499458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002037264,0.000029019115,0.0010675266,0.000057003126,0.000016568067,0.000028439756,0.000694242,0.000014337775,0.000047010617,0.05431737,0.9415609,0.00013031992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016382277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009549398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89033973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005952163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009913987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474951546","doi":"10.1515/til-2016-0017","title":"Technological tattletales and constitutional black holes: communications intermediaries and constitutional constraints","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Inquiries in Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intermediary; State (computer science); Constraint (computer-aided design); Business; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Public relations; Law; Economics; Engineering; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.03281549725311105,"score_gpt":0.3141082639295648,"score_spread":0.28129276667645375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474951546","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016376288,0.0002567676,0.9784599,0.008839916,0.00013804593,0.00018657639,0.00008889537,0.00009095432,0.0103013255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978197,0.00070778036,0.00094843743,0.00035456786,0.000078851976,0.000019702478,0.000007353668,0.0000033390156,0.00006025653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986867,0.0002572561,0.00026799826,0.0002495965,0.00022650149,0.00031195092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978078,0.001667431,0.000047101676,0.0002516918,0.00008004694,0.00014592851],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007290178,0.00013270426,0.0002182317,0.000056518613,0.00057566224,0.00009321446,0.000360541,0.00022853696,0.00052321446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001055127,0.00008697145,0.000031263036,0.000106169355,0.9995852,0.0002573536,0.00029460402,0.00018690624,0.000033533273],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016721662,0.000055182078,0.0014723628,0.00000563439,0.000013523957,0.00000784887,0.0012552134,6.408729e-8,0.00005939987,0.9953045,0.000079563266,0.0017299633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004855289,0.000029546209,0.0000042795673,0.000101295875,0.000012222114,0.000021564996,0.0022004906,0.0000067998344,0.00009587473,0.9855843,0.01129759,0.00016047935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.3973144e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012312317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99900955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005630765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000161912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5728832},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2486206515","doi":"10.1057/9780230293960_9","title":"The Courts and the Constitution: Hate Speech and Pornography in the United States, Canada, and Europe","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; First amendment; Law; Political science; Politics; Pornography; Free speech; Privilege (computing)","score_opus":0.01215413919057635,"score_gpt":0.2177723002988972,"score_spread":0.20561816110832085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2486206515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032249903,0.0040293187,0.000026000127,0.002672133,0.0005753092,0.001175117,0.00015005861,0.000029808027,0.9881173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98709834,0.0070021674,0.000015776193,0.0010891851,0.0002714395,0.00001402331,0.00002969053,0.000019417275,0.004459973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982186,0.00026199935,0.0003016892,0.0003276666,0.0005083225,0.00038174272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998341,0.000799014,0.00019528231,0.0003755158,0.0001419639,0.00014720375],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014417677,0.00029909483,0.00030537788,0.00009382246,0.001755778,0.00036970343,0.0004084052,0.00020413459,0.000026644164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005534992,0.00014219382,0.00005004953,0.000047238416,0.031616297,0.0000016164425,0.00010384964,0.0005658717,0.0000018473886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031984564,1.6978349e-7,0.0002397813,0.000008183088,0.000044627624,0.00007127345,0.0038885344,9.2703324e-8,7.316451e-7,0.9933711,0.000109374516,0.002234141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004876229,0.00001514425,0.00022795325,0.000034085733,0.000055064156,0.00003531967,0.00055478455,0.000006316144,0.0000016767555,0.64303476,0.35535187,0.00019543103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2908937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8667325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9838733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024334375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003176113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493198512","doi":"10.4018/978-1-61520-831-9.ch010","title":"Culture Clashes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Relation (database); Political science; Law; National security; Privacy law; Public administration; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Computer science","score_opus":0.026587870430211234,"score_gpt":0.27029413153233,"score_spread":0.24370626110211877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493198512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000049971422,0.002330289,0.00023568032,0.000118318036,0.0016630462,0.00030078448,0.00011266671,0.00022479374,0.9950094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030469771,0.00012212612,0.00016766792,0.0005254064,0.0043876343,0.0000076083093,0.000006129978,0.00003215913,0.9642815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981323,0.00003700094,0.00025315452,0.0003542836,0.00065560825,0.00056768244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897844,0.000023155055,0.00017147981,0.00034446106,0.00012463702,0.00035783666],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020280525,0.00033533433,0.00038520145,0.000025001871,0.0005084447,0.00013587918,0.0005246519,0.00096288155,0.0005476525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001684781,0.0002735408,0.0002944609,0.000014894412,0.006491852,0.000098980665,0.00008409869,0.0003005024,0.0014061488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006470349,0.000006448065,0.000016833494,0.000009308622,0.000053082298,0.000014227257,0.0019221834,4.7652613e-8,0.0000012024799,0.9575772,0.035309825,0.0050831484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077684155,0.0000131834195,0.0000014739423,0.000034259047,0.000049917522,0.0000024561969,0.000068062545,6.7326184e-8,0.0000019897232,0.44874007,0.5507866,0.00022420632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030033546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001544941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5154768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033298574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028610602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500111186","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199315215.001.0001","title":"Privacy Revisited: A Global Perspective on the Right to Be Left Alone","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Autonomy; Personally identifiable information; Political science; Privacy policy; Right to privacy; The Right to Privacy; Information privacy; Privacy law; Data Protection Act 1998; Framing (construction); Fundamental rights; Internet privacy; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Human rights; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.020298779473385726,"score_gpt":0.28576587378012175,"score_spread":0.26546709430673604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500111186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007673114,0.0009732904,0.00034125132,0.031955242,0.00118185,0.0014355195,0.00047492547,0.0002553483,0.96330583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005197732,0.00038359212,0.00013637904,0.0097325565,0.0064235893,0.000048055448,0.000029171186,0.000068654954,0.97798026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955649,0.00047573898,0.000452612,0.0010496114,0.0015142695,0.00094289385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675506,0.00048738002,0.00029406443,0.0012821768,0.00046856524,0.0007127279],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010901932,0.00056711474,0.00072823494,0.000074381336,0.0016925359,0.00045536674,0.0019399944,0.000674753,0.007858928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006199103,0.00033695693,0.0004536528,0.00023918581,0.0068424097,0.0003281657,0.0002748377,0.0006967546,0.0066282153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030362975,0.000032458956,0.000016442458,0.000007281962,0.00008207166,0.000029648882,0.0017883797,1.3478298e-7,0.0000021620087,0.6708868,0.32702282,0.000101419006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026916657,0.00009368269,0.000014122272,0.000286293,0.000062412495,0.000003163363,0.00028238128,1.15766284e-7,0.000012188997,0.27694747,0.72159547,0.00043354442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025151002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011870294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39457265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003454136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012205738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2505819909","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316403594.009","title":"Wade-ing into controversy: a case of accidental activism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Desegregation; Accidental","score_opus":0.01954133880415697,"score_gpt":0.2355998190465445,"score_spread":0.21605848024238755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2505819909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006695175,0.000093824194,0.0024924504,0.00004232478,0.0005617572,0.00045643406,0.00018535268,0.00010671191,0.9953916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.106850475,0.00012728128,0.000032585744,0.000028772067,0.00041811736,4.7709216e-7,0.0000057812654,0.00003101485,0.89250547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847883,0.00009695465,0.00021695718,0.0004504406,0.0003887201,0.00036809235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849725,0.00023326575,0.0003930717,0.00040373532,0.00020597945,0.0002666978],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022194638,0.0002964903,0.0005132573,0.00017308113,0.00065138395,0.000048704766,0.00056090753,0.0005109021,0.000033076114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002987186,0.0002901025,0.0003326783,0.0000098086675,0.0076348973,0.00028210346,0.00028344657,0.00029392523,0.000016967397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095463234,0.000010082736,0.0000035209753,0.00003344272,0.00017298905,0.00219622,0.002113267,6.849962e-8,0.00009015552,0.98741174,0.00488236,0.0029907003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011845105,0.000051768864,0.0000011283317,0.0002208479,0.00026998424,0.000054825457,0.0011009615,0.0000031561622,0.0003639205,0.00054584385,0.99573576,0.00046726866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037748849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003482653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052134576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003190564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508717609","doi":"","title":"Web Privacy Policies and Other Adventures in Never Never Land","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bankruptcy; Adventure; Privacy policy; Internet privacy; Quarter (Canadian coin); The Internet; Business; Information privacy; Advertising; Computer security; Computer science; World Wide Web; Art; History; Finance; Art history","score_opus":0.011701644607318951,"score_gpt":0.27478384239654574,"score_spread":0.2630821977892268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508717609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9670633,0.007228674,0.0010715552,0.0075011137,0.00025347815,0.00017771803,0.000001939993,0.00004357476,0.016658632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744633,0.011344559,0.0000142593,0.00071637274,0.00084316154,0.000002044018,3.417949e-7,0.000013473971,0.012602503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769455,0.00013928044,0.0001760132,0.00013654599,0.00026955895,0.0015840575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996592,0.000041584877,0.00007582759,0.00008791965,0.00003007018,0.00010544344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011120987,0.00010604237,0.00014511084,0.00010867079,0.00037611797,0.000099984776,0.00023720415,0.00009872967,0.00016449553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047785717,0.00008071177,0.00005543022,0.00021067895,0.0011881927,0.000505704,0.000026084768,0.00068738934,0.000017265735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027150627,0.000039987557,0.11963303,0.000001164596,0.000029135055,0.0000063089315,0.0035802252,0.0000038598096,0.000029004901,0.87339735,0.00044275558,0.002810008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008814752,0.00006949951,0.0051658778,0.000012812979,0.000012517204,0.000102010235,0.0026947213,0.000011663646,0.0000039986726,0.41603437,0.574855,0.00015601297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022330687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03232115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5744123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037754865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010490717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9853365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512887929","doi":"10.5131/ajcl.2015.0007","title":"Judging Stereotypes: What the European Court of Human Rights Can Borrow from American and Canadian Equal Protection Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Harm; Law; Stereotype (UML); Human rights; Raising (metalworking); Transformative learning; Sociology; Political science; Common law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0628466398633027,"score_gpt":0.313046563790455,"score_spread":0.2501999239271523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512887929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.975112,0.00022158894,0.0013393027,0.004557379,0.00030031102,0.000247325,0.000014894399,0.000012826587,0.018194338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986689,0.000019243382,0.00010475901,0.00052262266,0.00060052576,0.00000194715,0.0000013498221,0.00001053093,0.00007012197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966592,0.0020716372,0.0003648708,0.00013340692,0.0004767618,0.00029408454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979919,0.00018902069,0.00089825824,0.00021138079,0.00035212142,0.00035729274],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015683745,0.00014480701,0.00045853152,0.00005840276,0.0011315848,0.00024107532,0.0005528261,0.00001441717,0.000014433587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075332673,0.000079123376,0.00007709363,0.00029908048,0.029216157,0.0004149338,0.00003300103,0.0003017954,0.000005083023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012358592,0.000055304132,0.000350379,0.0000015529388,0.00021360964,0.000019413012,0.18950245,0.000075622105,0.0002343377,0.80587584,0.0007467792,0.0028011228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002006727,0.004318767,0.0039252806,0.00036872044,0.00039703702,0.00006282355,0.4555501,0.00020688746,0.0016433885,0.2746021,0.2560235,0.00089464476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47926408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7003213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5312737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015464345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021616649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97342575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2513007397","doi":"","title":"The Lawful Access Fallacy: Voluntary Warrantless Disclosures, Customer Privacy, and Government Requests for Subscriber Information","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Internet privacy; Information privacy; Business; Computer security; Government (linguistics); Secrecy; Law; Personally identifiable information; The Right to Privacy; Civil liberties; Political science; Politics; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.022974289713442536,"score_gpt":0.29620701089493806,"score_spread":0.27323272118149555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2513007397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6765931,0.0019502959,0.0074316603,0.044805612,0.009013741,0.005708538,0.0005801956,0.00046038776,0.25345647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99216604,0.0006220946,0.00018332309,0.0006450111,0.0007892838,0.000111860114,0.00001915119,0.0000169715,0.0054462375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998128,0.00010109482,0.00031509897,0.00023364871,0.000725667,0.0004965199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984997,0.00017738719,0.0002890984,0.0006549801,0.00013072493,0.00024813446],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010693956,0.00017364089,0.00020051844,0.000013727198,0.0045296326,0.0021196592,0.0012096044,0.00014245171,0.00006721741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030541254,0.000117447766,0.0000904739,0.000048702088,0.0044013597,0.0035567807,0.00026404948,0.0001728407,0.00007382229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008463782,0.000028248636,0.030735072,0.00003301324,0.000044059278,0.0000024571937,0.003053738,0.0000013013387,0.00001169954,0.94416237,0.016332086,0.005511336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007759303,0.000027004746,0.015653748,0.000036027355,0.000034535296,0.0000013064549,0.00053688313,0.000027316015,0.000113509246,0.020706458,0.9618454,0.00024187288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00697674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037225727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9455133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018792888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011703498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514321000","doi":"","title":"Information Privacy Law, Fourth Edition","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Aspen Publishers, Inc. eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information privacy law; Privacy policy; Information privacy; Internet privacy; Privacy law; Consumer privacy; Privacy by Design; Anonymity; Patriot Act; Social media; Personally identifiable information; Data Protection Act 1998; Statute; Privacy software; Political science; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.025183610089341443,"score_gpt":0.23979895194193934,"score_spread":0.2146153418525979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514321000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005446865,0.00004744144,0.0015903945,0.00050474674,0.0041732932,0.0010195054,0.00007805868,0.00041970416,0.9921614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003540635,0.00003023679,0.00039796418,0.0016796362,0.0057813227,0.000094238996,0.0016151067,0.00007009708,0.9867908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665767,0.00018845948,0.0007302488,0.000374802,0.001292533,0.0007562641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973738,0.00012960276,0.0007565438,0.0007310508,0.0005999485,0.0004090361],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012040096,0.00044180278,0.00050712837,0.00031898016,0.0010758359,0.002541181,0.0015032401,0.0011998668,0.0027689869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001697418,0.00042082783,0.0002473144,0.000081008184,0.0075739254,0.00750856,0.000267362,0.0007561192,0.0014285827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009951984,0.0000111439795,0.0000024781268,0.000022411745,0.00004808808,0.0000035681653,0.009620115,6.0840364e-8,1.5689044e-7,0.58175975,0.399161,0.009361261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030654683,0.00004664242,0.000003208751,0.00005647901,0.000061962906,0.0000018248523,0.0005777752,0.000001324494,0.0000055645824,0.30231735,0.69621265,0.00040867474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003258945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026532183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29705164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006807897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001947879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2514596130","doi":"","title":"Democratic Communication and the Library as Workplace","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Ethics","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Censorship; Intellectual freedom; Politics; Intellectual property; Human rights; Sociology; Civil liberties; Law; Sustenance; Civil society; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.020761156158113647,"score_gpt":0.2936539790936085,"score_spread":0.2728928229354949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2514596130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0128703285,0.002330441,0.075583875,0.15217076,0.0009231546,0.00040969436,0.0000016345718,0.000045865272,0.7556642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725894,0.011719396,0.0044510523,0.008190871,0.00014293326,0.0000020537207,0.0000020745895,0.000004679632,0.002897577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985847,0.00062452635,0.00033871204,0.000014922009,0.0003616524,0.00007548572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814326,0.0011039797,0.0004145526,0.00009254445,0.0001879679,0.00005768769],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00403602,0.000037423557,0.000084004896,0.0000474078,0.0006744518,0.0002257768,0.00020074686,0.0001176066,0.00008672551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018795979,0.00002215545,0.000037565354,0.00014539014,0.0031434977,0.0028429725,0.000014209445,0.00053326663,0.000016368225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018086845,0.000003816603,0.00011714973,0.0000058176606,0.000007387055,1.3981663e-7,0.06658744,0.000020775407,1.5031407e-7,0.9292438,0.003299895,0.00069554785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087195344,0.000023797333,0.00007882028,0.000054963515,0.000018627252,0.000024244218,0.019491225,0.00009470691,0.00002353075,0.4735352,0.5057258,0.000057126133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012584017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014697301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95971906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019223166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004148295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W251884708","doi":"","title":"The Chill Sets In: National Security and the Decline of Equality in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrorism; Political science; Battle; Law; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Fell; Islam; History; Ancient history; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.008383715872340354,"score_gpt":0.267937588650108,"score_spread":0.25955387277776765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W251884708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9337684,0.0076139225,0.00018623621,0.04801041,0.00020898171,0.00021578674,0.000007861853,0.0000036632416,0.009984776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993887,0.005484381,0.000003886539,0.0002661298,0.00022183564,0.0000016650675,4.919843e-7,0.00000233546,0.00013224041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805355,0.0003777361,0.00025967503,0.0000717684,0.00048319795,0.00075404765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938035,0.00034197405,0.000116633884,0.00005309392,0.00006993998,0.000037996764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072045475,0.00005102121,0.000107159794,0.000022489307,0.0003767417,0.000028153308,0.00025699852,0.00003156905,0.000012786626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021093334,0.000027585162,0.000029592346,0.00014826174,0.001597859,0.00010708577,0.000023958954,0.0006816844,4.180926e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033913002,0.00001110363,0.0071079107,6.0874146e-7,0.000011933834,2.835158e-7,0.0020121431,0.000019463416,6.200302e-7,0.98749214,0.0000633174,0.003246572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001057597,0.000012165094,0.0020112148,0.0000052686087,0.000003513446,0.000011504647,0.0056803385,0.0002507387,0.0000047957255,0.97807366,0.012836296,0.00005292079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65184116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.347504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015540818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009617744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99599683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527490146","doi":"10.15290/bsp.2016.20a.10","title":"Systemy wyborów sędziów stanowych w USA","year":2016,"lang":"pl","type":"article","venue":"Białostockie Studia Prawnicze","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.04104183689816554,"score_gpt":0.30180851247208895,"score_spread":0.2607666755739234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527490146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050152577,0.027100734,0.029961692,0.04790595,0.035688277,0.009890319,0.001833539,0.0013936025,0.7960733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86887467,0.0046954853,0.00018912317,0.00055079337,0.0038797609,0.00019736656,0.000007940871,0.000118318334,0.12148657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909404,0.001300992,0.0014168815,0.0017182498,0.0022576645,0.0023658085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99460936,0.0014424032,0.00082782307,0.0015184274,0.00065744313,0.00094456115],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002617382,0.0009230882,0.0013693545,0.000275743,0.0023347458,0.0004591111,0.0018715445,0.00080681004,0.004388468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083915837,0.000629291,0.0006285921,0.0014081555,0.016857678,0.0010939052,0.0005862717,0.000443254,0.011137463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012729382,0.00054266833,0.013567788,0.00012627264,0.0005814301,0.0001087369,0.007317193,0.0000010027924,0.00042124052,0.8455562,0.11336807,0.018282112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028671063,0.00055877847,0.003908229,0.0007198888,0.0003435342,0.0000133122385,0.0017949115,0.0000039851384,0.00017794158,0.004841689,0.9833714,0.001399222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016686377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006121824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87000334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009393874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019484793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530640872","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1322","title":"Book Notes: Science for Segregation: Race, Law, and the Case Against Brown v Board of Education, by John P. Jackson, Jr.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Law; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.00947662274415041,"score_gpt":0.2641372715377747,"score_spread":0.2546606487936243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530640872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050293095,0.014949295,0.012865202,0.01535495,0.0016869694,0.0010118318,0.000050321905,0.00005350275,0.94899863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893357,0.00063376734,0.0011881029,0.0024246539,0.0008953949,0.000019604415,0.0000044521125,0.000013832238,0.005484477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998317,0.00016021194,0.00040753817,0.00022816291,0.00050220615,0.00038485776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827975,0.00034925528,0.0003530977,0.00019886487,0.0006237449,0.0001952857],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017870312,0.000131882,0.00022294241,0.00005017748,0.004008188,0.00048012778,0.00039732613,0.000088950015,0.000113244314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015608633,0.00008924018,0.000107020045,0.00024943793,0.018753475,0.0008881341,0.000033686243,0.00017271626,0.0000054045454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029857272,0.00008213552,0.00004407786,0.000009565887,0.000010499121,0.0000074966642,0.0015969657,0.000007848728,0.00011683083,0.9571373,0.038912736,0.0020446985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002065165,0.000054833472,0.000016923344,0.00006725449,0.00006584462,0.0002851489,0.0020486552,0.00011526586,0.0010302346,0.3439368,0.6500673,0.00024652586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030430302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07279421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9843064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011266032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005652638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99728847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2536722990","doi":"","title":"Chapter X. Motion to Dismiss: Bias Crime, Online Communication, and the Sex Lives of Others in NJ v. Ravi","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Intimidation; Plea; Relation (database); Prejudice (legal term); Sexual orientation; Law; Criminology; Sexual assault; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Computer science","score_opus":0.05859957881116268,"score_gpt":0.30033399944846395,"score_spread":0.24173442063730127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2536722990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20230415,0.0035207118,0.027980445,0.33521408,0.002954826,0.006824634,0.00074156484,0.00035381873,0.42010576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98932445,0.00058149366,0.00096495054,0.0059477864,0.0003023086,0.00008933318,0.00016455817,0.000015555257,0.002609545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980496,0.0005454593,0.00042851816,0.0002548653,0.00049590896,0.00022565314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861765,0.00029369292,0.00020845719,0.00038975445,0.00028589272,0.00020455144],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018598436,0.00014321537,0.00027007933,0.00012752388,0.00041247686,0.00013269423,0.00046343426,0.00009275171,0.000509563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039880877,0.00010842827,0.000057386744,0.00030291188,0.00414426,0.0027759902,0.00010997338,0.00013566244,0.000079526195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009249142,0.00015444445,0.0005241016,0.0000075013286,0.0000152507955,0.0000014039243,0.014340277,0.000051246476,0.000019594187,0.9804153,0.0020739094,0.0023045142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013853064,0.00057954836,0.052017484,0.0006925584,0.0001822434,0.000017669496,0.10075154,0.000808472,0.0014349956,0.30440205,0.5238519,0.0014084794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014445861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008179385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7870203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008282765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009059101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2563002987","doi":"","title":"Teacher Cell Phone Searches in Light of Ontario v. Quon","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Richmond journal of law & technology","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Computer science; Computer security; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03661227630827063,"score_gpt":0.2619535797052298,"score_spread":0.22534130339695918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2563002987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7211943,0.0012538999,0.00041485523,0.0012223265,0.0003631117,0.00011942645,8.937439e-7,0.000033857854,0.27539727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99181306,0.00015508232,0.0013664634,0.000034962402,0.00009893274,0.0000015856746,1.5334666e-7,0.00000954256,0.0065201907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860954,0.00010486023,0.0004862577,0.00012897963,0.00031607263,0.00035429074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991553,0.00004158807,0.0003636004,0.00018647488,0.00016431393,0.00008872533],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009226263,0.000105109895,0.00036671894,0.0003299712,0.00011624677,0.00001046877,0.0006020309,0.0003536857,0.0005827138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050677736,0.00008202074,0.00010256865,0.00041794585,0.004124938,0.0002138704,0.000058923502,0.0005875079,0.000021451222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090299465,0.0007697692,0.042136274,0.000014192103,0.000051696756,0.00018349616,0.067364514,9.843234e-7,0.005234329,0.8812924,0.00094631437,0.0019157206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019637626,0.0008715731,0.0022105302,0.00010305174,0.00007330317,0.000055648667,0.007531072,0.0000015083332,0.08307858,0.2593348,0.6444246,0.00035155122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025426101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1288993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64347833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003113175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004754356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566270018","doi":"","title":"Apple and the American Revolution: Remembering Why We Have the Fourth Amendment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Constitutionality; Government (linguistics); Suspect; Search and seizure; Legislative history; Lawsuit; Law; Political science; Statutory law; Economic Justice; Fair use; Phone; Patriot Act; Freedom of information; Legislature; Internet privacy; Advertising; Supreme court; Terrorism; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.023173504145780132,"score_gpt":0.2670404915413949,"score_spread":0.2438669873956148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566270018","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013737969,0.0012376938,0.23401253,0.4629183,0.0008657439,0.0012927274,0.000013336011,0.00025216056,0.28566954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96466935,0.002955638,0.00038756654,0.0015025061,0.00073031755,0.00003758329,3.1459152e-7,0.0000072015187,0.029709538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991008,0.00016778662,0.000105062354,0.00014352924,0.00025573152,0.00022705736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993811,0.00026045166,0.00007159964,0.00019634682,0.00003011167,0.00006035676],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071868737,0.000064649015,0.00010719639,0.000010656649,0.0007824563,0.00006484369,0.0002135272,0.000017633594,0.0002651706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041664774,0.000022232,0.000044558754,0.000093952716,0.014020482,0.00009904181,0.000057084682,0.000042690106,0.000027450855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001698599,0.000006725443,0.00058244995,0.0000010480784,0.00001302709,4.9271205e-7,0.006299434,3.9361004e-7,0.00003088279,0.95344687,0.027660757,0.011940945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042295526,0.000020360178,0.000075952375,0.000011391862,0.00001333907,0.000001161054,0.0096912235,0.00003277518,0.000048141443,0.038837854,0.9507628,0.00008205114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028474547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070852516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9509314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052437583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028730612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567552495","doi":"","title":"School Board Liability for Student-Peer Harassment and Discrimination: \"Deliberate Indifference\" and Beyond?.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education Canada","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Psychology; League; Social psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.022797958376469918,"score_gpt":0.29672665869546205,"score_spread":0.27392870031899214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567552495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90800965,0.0008348039,0.00061010435,0.07093773,0.0033955888,0.0010425312,0.000053039206,0.00003271272,0.015083828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635811,0.0000990446,0.0002997837,0.001152911,0.00043287757,0.0001006592,0.000014761224,0.000005248897,0.03431362],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907845,0.00005754782,0.00013744587,0.00020447871,0.0003503549,0.00017171026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933004,0.00008413942,0.000053398915,0.00010715189,0.00020209383,0.00022315739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024189729,0.00007514729,0.0000918832,0.00002478883,0.00052699365,0.00015072926,0.000095386364,0.00004103397,0.00039415612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013019277,0.00006707439,0.00001294115,0.000076472,0.00072519097,0.00018859691,0.000014457618,0.000053921336,0.0000017279368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000621624,0.00027127835,0.081698805,0.0000551685,0.000032879176,5.104393e-7,0.053398184,4.7083466e-7,0.000012547955,0.29380196,0.5297434,0.04097862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051607384,0.000057948102,0.10972625,0.000018602563,0.000047007463,7.329838e-7,0.028802665,0.0001004413,0.00003479156,0.030972375,0.8294006,0.0003225107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1680101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7001158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53210574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032828693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009720975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8375302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W259297610","doi":"","title":"Protecting Privacy through a Responsible Decryption Policy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard journal of law & technology","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Laptop; Encryption; Amnesty; Law; Child pornography; Doctrine; Internet privacy; Computer security; Pornography; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Human rights","score_opus":0.03046451631812715,"score_gpt":0.3334296457189025,"score_spread":0.30296512940077536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W259297610","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4381702,0.0010663073,0.24171668,0.18817294,0.0017592375,0.0016200575,0.000006352623,0.0011837159,0.12630452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865313,0.00030541496,0.011247948,0.0006014683,0.00082803814,0.0000035221897,2.1757552e-7,0.000010359659,0.00047173508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835604,0.00021190773,0.00045819132,0.00015429956,0.0003749937,0.0004445679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998838,0.000082929975,0.00045462346,0.00023401811,0.00030039233,0.00009002889],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011771345,0.000117798016,0.00029514232,0.00031412998,0.0007481385,0.00007911684,0.0005938432,0.00034252848,0.00009342138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010819639,0.00009804898,0.00012647886,0.0007609797,0.003578255,0.0005906616,0.00004189667,0.00057575805,0.00008729459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006825568,0.00006994621,0.00007399918,0.0000027817198,0.000018559382,0.00005488021,0.0047190203,0.0000035481185,0.0062910365,0.9780855,0.00029130027,0.010321126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035671057,0.00030406943,0.000038192135,0.000044478304,0.000012821801,0.00010720635,0.00056067633,0.000001315633,0.0052736993,0.5008601,0.49235767,0.000083096085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017548742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009883622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5483611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026292438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061936263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593637028","doi":"10.22329/cjpp.v1i1.8159","title":"The Ties That Blind: The Moral Value (and Disvalue) of Anonymity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Practical Philosophy","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Internet privacy; Computer security; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.12393539410649425,"score_gpt":0.33831638337820386,"score_spread":0.21438098927170962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593637028","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1641364,0.0027518596,0.0006462149,0.70533055,0.004650993,0.0006422725,0.00006034925,0.000035649067,0.121745706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977501,0.00036495112,0.000055625173,0.000371346,0.000979235,0.0000013253622,4.607864e-7,0.000008699542,0.0004682741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835896,0.00045306614,0.0002680172,0.000092488,0.00048394423,0.00034354732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750173,0.0013696743,0.00025007024,0.00017095171,0.00016672931,0.0005408681],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024318483,0.00008576594,0.00017283464,0.000091587826,0.0012701959,0.00018194612,0.00038832086,0.000089291665,0.000062922685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016571443,0.000045687106,0.0001191956,0.000297401,0.011120097,0.0004122677,0.000023463175,0.00040123521,0.00001859291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033011176,0.000007838481,0.0023029624,0.0000039996867,0.000045025427,0.000065330845,0.0030290452,0.000004387959,0.0000026468692,0.98802394,0.0059243063,0.00055752497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003139501,0.00009053509,0.0025352004,0.000024360883,0.00006705767,0.000030004368,0.0030648494,0.000033551016,0.000018069926,0.86476547,0.12896453,0.0000924407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00409715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013989293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8336137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072413786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013702308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99157107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597015980","doi":"","title":"I'm Right and You're an Idiot: The Toxic State of Public Discourse and How to Clean It Up","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œinnovation journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Idiot; Ignorance; Politics; Hyperbole; Civility; Rhetoric; State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Media studies; Political science; Literature; Philosophy; Metaphor","score_opus":0.04563214943999562,"score_gpt":0.31148137059658276,"score_spread":0.26584922115658716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597015980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80133283,0.00006907562,0.040815838,0.15541309,0.00061270857,0.00020876536,0.0000170306,0.0000163829,0.0015142863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917148,0.00012491441,0.000058662,0.00055674353,0.00055846665,0.0000024461276,7.075633e-7,0.0000076478755,0.006975665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987489,0.00025580463,0.00022377487,0.00012604552,0.00039788728,0.000247616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990355,0.000092034345,0.00023500226,0.00016015134,0.0003521142,0.00012521751],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026994448,0.00008341485,0.000110791254,0.00011188637,0.0009962738,0.00038128762,0.000284859,0.000039085455,0.00013267198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010740664,0.000035217214,0.000022751932,0.0005129272,0.002951907,0.0007404474,0.00003502038,0.00012625911,0.0000035374628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003342832,0.000046101573,0.005413704,0.000004389778,0.00005158772,0.0000037888904,0.025334015,9.525312e-7,0.0022798264,0.6330642,0.016069956,0.31769806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020797614,0.00048091242,0.024816675,0.000113907525,0.000055579763,0.00008041847,0.035239697,0.00007101194,0.00096123706,0.19426583,0.741329,0.0005059259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021207348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012608081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72525907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003652848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013138259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604419840","doi":"","title":"Anonymity and the Supreme Court's Model of Expression: How Should Anonymity be Analysed Under Section 2(b) of the Charter?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Supreme court; Section (typography); Law; Charter; Political science; Expression (computer science); Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.043699410814146716,"score_gpt":0.27185089503528664,"score_spread":0.22815148422113993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604419840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93078035,0.00056936074,0.022620171,0.008571208,0.0010390597,0.0011131006,0.0000810275,0.00008260831,0.0351431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633116,0.000105688654,0.00025326436,0.00043215195,0.00018783899,0.000015043619,0.0000018437106,0.000011539967,0.002661445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997694,0.00076727633,0.00027422962,0.00028517153,0.00068470696,0.00029457637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986941,0.00020847122,0.0002512075,0.0005244093,0.00018614029,0.0001356427],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001429383,0.00015900779,0.00033629514,0.000030422094,0.0008313002,0.00009234213,0.00039695064,0.00020401312,0.0001940011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017858717,0.00008847685,0.00019500697,0.000303936,0.0074042045,0.00039130653,0.000062742656,0.00027799304,0.0000013995312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099195866,0.00011493078,0.0043283002,0.000027274129,0.00006696288,5.909539e-7,0.0034591865,0.00044646644,0.01157289,0.9768764,0.0029628158,0.00004500468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018367203,0.00030584485,0.007391092,0.0003849345,0.001030913,0.000014068882,0.024752608,0.0121541135,0.19917138,0.65519685,0.0792688,0.0019621656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013553726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005582173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3216795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056363275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017862508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605920309","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4375","title":"WARMING UP THE “CHILLING EFFECT”: A COMMENT ON THE MOTIVE CLAUSE DISCUSSIONS IN R V KHAWAJA (2010) AND R V KHAWAJA (2012)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Racial profiling; Terrorism; Constitutionality; Law; Declaration; Political science; Dignity; Enforcement; Suspect; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.05492174816345212,"score_gpt":0.3292921061895553,"score_spread":0.27437035802610316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605920309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8742484,0.00094002613,0.003413344,0.06879915,0.0043918784,0.0039335815,0.00004408699,0.00012372661,0.044105846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953353,0.00010438875,0.000067271634,0.002215082,0.0007147342,0.00006559982,0.0000013228473,0.000020507068,0.0014758171],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789435,0.0005421541,0.0002734914,0.00024037813,0.00048413785,0.0005654893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973134,0.001898485,0.0001390659,0.00037859564,0.000055949084,0.00021455351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019227472,0.00018266881,0.0002516408,0.000101860525,0.00081525557,0.00015396146,0.00073012407,0.00011019269,0.00017406634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056362234,0.0000911579,0.000069395246,0.0002569669,0.0020033347,0.00055782916,0.00025685117,0.0003461195,0.000051480358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027317207,0.0004955807,0.033345047,0.00016202517,0.00013217548,0.0000069925627,0.17396052,0.00021292207,0.000351928,0.76062113,0.019854037,0.010584473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005282335,0.0010319558,0.19547029,0.0025753682,0.001974672,0.000008861575,0.11428959,0.0007428249,0.0065017627,0.008364309,0.6612669,0.0024911317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009947758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045969334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7522568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008348759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004885162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73813707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606403771","doi":"10.1017/s0008423915001043","title":"Toleration Without Hate Speech: The <i>Keegstra</i> Decision, American Free Speech Exceptionalism and Locke's <i>Letter</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Toleration; Dissenting opinion; Exceptionalism; Polity; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Free speech; Political science; Economic Justice; First amendment; Marketplace of ideas; Context (archaeology); Liberalism; Equal Protection Clause; Sociology; Democracy; Law and economics; Politics; Constitution; Supreme court; History","score_opus":0.02874659873599342,"score_gpt":0.293339716586368,"score_spread":0.26459311785037454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606403771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8810905,0.00019115234,0.01170591,0.08751786,0.0021161977,0.00024678418,0.000035989295,0.000017827944,0.017077748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896099,0.0000099608005,0.0020463108,0.006555613,0.001496207,9.196646e-7,3.8320186e-7,0.0000064920396,0.00027418928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972042,0.00014614529,0.0003390447,0.00020897067,0.0011366595,0.0009649847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954662,0.00019204628,0.00015401407,0.00024117147,0.00067540817,0.0032712114],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030269306,0.000113519425,0.00019466097,0.00016274354,0.0010467784,0.0005893501,0.0010258756,0.000054313256,0.00007287569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019177711,0.00007506351,0.000057216595,0.00062760804,0.034992915,0.00069586554,0.00003745719,0.00024618395,0.000018650571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005584398,0.000008051666,0.004786268,7.986371e-7,0.0000036449856,0.000063792504,0.002138821,0.000003282286,0.00005127648,0.9701948,0.016454753,0.006288909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011439365,0.0003922639,0.039221257,0.00010406071,0.00006462936,0.0007184989,0.009422668,0.00015734245,0.00075918424,0.57711446,0.3703055,0.00059615675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069146015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1751374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39308032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051395857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004082877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9676333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608985607","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1308","title":"You Don’t Need a Metaphor to Know Which Way the Case Goes: The Senate Reference and Constitutional Metaphors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06529867385144111,"score_gpt":0.3176957255885496,"score_spread":0.25239705173710847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608985607","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048658666,0.6012292,0.003317216,0.1642682,0.0023653214,0.0057681384,0.00024272896,0.00028350673,0.21765982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92822427,0.060998496,0.0002978212,0.007352329,0.000445285,0.00019863847,0.000013180972,0.000018022058,0.002451974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736667,0.000864346,0.00038283944,0.00036230584,0.0005969384,0.00042688157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981137,0.0002618061,0.00012318378,0.0005326055,0.00059358426,0.00037511374],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004423921,0.00021741299,0.00044139722,0.00002423027,0.0012023634,0.00019552866,0.000579517,0.00008897679,0.00024382789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069945893,0.00010453774,0.000114242466,0.00060967123,0.0136354165,0.0002802816,0.00013771866,0.00024732234,0.000178858],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062020417,0.000018893656,0.000020378031,0.00008000251,0.000055539098,0.000035753448,0.002022797,0.0000010950014,0.0000047774033,0.97015095,0.025999347,0.0016042548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018052646,0.000028392707,0.0000024432113,0.000377538,0.00029066775,0.00014847897,0.0017195988,0.000010326422,0.000013481494,0.005485041,0.99154943,0.00019409497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029384836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019486228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96555007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089659574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043538294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618770897","doi":"","title":"The FTC, the Unfairness Doctrine, and Privacy by Design: New Legal Frontiers in Cybersecurity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of business & technology law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Computer security; Internet privacy; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.01478628708310893,"score_gpt":0.2676936259134297,"score_spread":0.2529073388303208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618770897","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21945852,0.018218124,0.1725526,0.57197946,0.0071365237,0.0011836527,0.0000064365167,0.00017368999,0.009290967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953971,0.00258835,0.0008693561,0.00013427113,0.00034112541,0.000003445491,1.5006545e-7,0.00000951119,0.0006566833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987171,0.00012040779,0.00034369167,0.00014787597,0.00030984002,0.0003610687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985623,0.000124591,0.0005612547,0.00043444664,0.00023877899,0.000078623074],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013647072,0.0001277374,0.0002927473,0.00009587309,0.002119744,0.00041873855,0.0016647273,0.00026411458,0.00000700942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005354176,0.00006892753,0.000053440355,0.00032587102,0.020345276,0.000757712,0.00015479655,0.00049157604,0.000001548205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007294447,0.000044299428,0.005613206,0.0000036078955,0.00004293883,0.000056788,0.0009575851,0.0000034236302,0.000057079036,0.9549322,0.016890962,0.021324977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010811364,0.000041301613,0.0024123692,0.000047601898,0.000043050695,0.00006445837,0.0016042885,0.00001581763,0.0002664693,0.29824373,0.69602764,0.00015211632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014243042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014823008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7759386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008023612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033202552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619160121","doi":"","title":"Making the Time Fit the Crime: Clearly Defining Online Harassment Crimes and Providing Incentives for Investigating Online Threats in the Digital Age","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Incentive; Criminology; Business; Internet privacy; Computer security; Digital forensics; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Economics; Law; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.08374184334142833,"score_gpt":0.359636468943007,"score_spread":0.2758946256015787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619160121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84723544,0.003351827,0.008264341,0.10490512,0.0015976728,0.0012743699,0.00031422428,0.000049172006,0.033007804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960781,0.00009565412,0.0010096146,0.0010459975,0.00075549673,0.000005111476,0.000004117377,0.000010297691,0.0009956611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985585,0.00015929111,0.00040370968,0.00012460718,0.000546465,0.00020739327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789137,0.0014294056,0.0003638684,0.0000884878,0.0001836684,0.0000431962],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012560036,0.00010538913,0.0001399256,0.000047717782,0.00052785216,0.00052306836,0.0007008974,0.00004098394,0.000020119563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006493518,0.000042738433,0.000100515295,0.000073304895,0.003090391,0.0006149462,0.000077865014,0.00017994204,0.0000024142066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004407304,0.000081762795,0.0042034015,0.000003969998,0.00006614771,0.0000107952355,0.008125174,0.00000795456,0.00025824408,0.9737725,0.00043054583,0.012995423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004917772,0.0007383743,0.055550497,0.0032293915,0.00019185587,0.00023548989,0.0350932,0.0011379812,0.00041020598,0.57009995,0.32764882,0.0007464565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004085879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002609486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40367258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008717294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000114306094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W27134153","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.6b00079","title":"How I Corrupted America's Youth: Getting Angry Letters Is No Laughing Matter--And the Same Goes for Censorship.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"School library journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Commission for Environmental Cooperation; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Censorship; Media studies; Advertising; Intellectual freedom; Literature; Art; Psychology; History; Internet privacy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.012682268757765703,"score_gpt":0.2309084923501418,"score_spread":0.2182262235923761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W27134153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64659184,0.00082123454,0.006456218,0.32696703,0.0058695455,0.0007975817,0.0001410633,0.00022449683,0.012130996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90849185,0.0005166658,0.012626597,0.036239844,0.015396897,0.000021627242,0.000020872389,0.00010267864,0.026582956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825966,0.000318994,0.0002724641,0.00023232037,0.0003697603,0.00054680125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986083,0.00046077513,0.0003019106,0.00019752806,0.00006012884,0.00037137335],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078030245,0.00017463978,0.000259286,0.00008170251,0.0018934194,0.0023306278,0.0005947944,0.00011716364,0.001123981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038060412,0.00010908543,0.00020439025,0.00017153485,0.0043743504,0.002499668,0.000076717064,0.00086518953,0.00006955581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089704624,0.000115883166,0.16887672,0.000074785334,0.00039624257,0.00006550454,0.10250813,0.0000049995288,0.0070770653,0.093566515,0.6091311,0.017286012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00472757,0.00010083542,0.0058751297,0.00018460848,0.00021024082,0.00012464524,0.03342893,0.00021960432,0.0005493776,0.039139904,0.91439867,0.0010404673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006407783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012032102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30526757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001621183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011917432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739249835","doi":"","title":"Race, Rhetoric, and Judicial Opinions: Missouri as a Case Study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maryland law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Narrative; Race (biology); Status quo; Scholarship; Critical race theory; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Political science; Law; Gender studies; History; Literature; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.04814173127565492,"score_gpt":0.3730117145657373,"score_spread":0.3248699832900824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739249835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0520658,0.30364567,0.00008701592,0.021465715,0.0035136857,0.005517057,0.000046440236,0.0002276851,0.6134309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8560261,0.13196312,0.000053777905,0.001944411,0.0018002533,0.00009553582,0.000007543475,0.000022030754,0.008087211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986973,0.0002571768,0.00023710428,0.00027042883,0.00027769688,0.00026033918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990164,0.000092417424,0.00016432848,0.0004644429,0.000058927406,0.00020349513],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011770604,0.00012995406,0.0003971173,0.000014620692,0.002712499,0.00025893655,0.0003128894,0.000064197025,0.00037517864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022966799,0.00009433268,0.00007685501,0.000061078325,0.0026497587,0.00025154493,0.00010086546,0.00010913534,0.00008992752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013096366,0.0002811995,0.0044821575,0.00050023996,0.00007818602,0.0025191987,0.0047856406,1.6229214e-8,3.0167143e-7,0.92120475,0.032703493,0.03343174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044905941,0.000087291286,0.0001520832,0.00042618028,0.00010119427,0.00015490614,0.00034763047,4.4188826e-7,2.4761994e-7,0.0031913132,0.9949271,0.00016255493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018860582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010706015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9622236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025377632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007442695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2742011336","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2017.12","title":"Should the Injustice Done to Her be the Law’s Concern? The Case of Cinderella","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Harm; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Mistake; Sociology; Political science; Economic Justice; Settlement (finance); Business","score_opus":0.10124538374452363,"score_gpt":0.36336047326480053,"score_spread":0.2621150895202769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2742011336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36093667,0.005109329,0.0015905868,0.33905587,0.0066607837,0.0013246207,0.00014822137,0.000019087034,0.28515482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99126726,0.0001001515,0.000038515693,0.0059640906,0.0010276182,0.0000034208017,1.023252e-7,0.000012211253,0.001586654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982117,0.00032637935,0.00037920312,0.000145112,0.0004621101,0.00047550086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971839,0.00053402747,0.00048962235,0.00074360886,0.0004266831,0.0006221274],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023895374,0.00013446313,0.00023011319,0.000029264167,0.004774514,0.00054539734,0.0024601629,0.0001093061,0.00025994013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004631925,0.00006426271,0.00014271747,0.00012471493,0.017458824,0.0003407627,0.00005917621,0.00047141497,0.000015445703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012743092,0.000007769007,0.00032584352,0.0000049913433,0.00004114669,0.0007380288,0.029611519,0.000026881457,0.000021977947,0.95698553,0.011424548,0.000799029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033133876,0.00013785635,0.00054331316,0.00012781301,0.00018769885,0.00059991574,0.01848864,0.000010448949,0.00027600554,0.015692037,0.9633885,0.00021644667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40545207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91636914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95196396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013880945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013814379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751295992","doi":"","title":"Something to Talk About: Applying the Unwritten Principle of Democracy to Secure a Constitutional Right to Access Government Information in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Constitutional right; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Access to information; Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology; Computer science; Politics; Information access; Constitution; Philosophy; Library science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.016209689655768314,"score_gpt":0.3227719313577834,"score_spread":0.3065622417020151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751295992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82556355,0.00016094673,0.013024345,0.0074080974,0.0025760308,0.0062982365,0.00023439423,0.0000598811,0.1446745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929837,0.000043829976,0.00048936455,0.0011998379,0.00019897145,0.00032602155,0.00009336522,0.00000961639,0.004655281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975745,0.00007722697,0.00038770874,0.00019745783,0.0014166592,0.0003464457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990441,0.00014298254,0.00023549232,0.00019599033,0.00017674117,0.00020469798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044064122,0.00017158534,0.00026334438,0.00010340849,0.00062956905,0.00011183737,0.0006385596,0.00012834356,0.00013933342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031045367,0.00013595907,0.000048986683,0.00063923316,0.00040243904,0.00041602127,0.00007537492,0.00022889492,0.00001695401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014010306,0.00004387386,0.001793803,0.0001573913,0.000059892824,0.000020214182,0.21562068,0.0064352974,0.00013680964,0.7621288,0.009323638,0.004139552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034637837,0.000028297276,0.0051758722,0.00041927223,0.000029412415,0.0000022460954,0.06863848,0.00007188135,0.0012677934,0.0012427366,0.9222613,0.00051630725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6938934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9663922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9129377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017714516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033235366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58958113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755938","doi":"10.1097/00006676-198904000-00001","title":"A Right to Reach an Audience: An Approach to Intermediary Bias on the Internet","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Intermediary; Selection (genetic algorithm); Filter (signal processing); Internet privacy; Computer science; Internet access; Voice over IP; Class (philosophy); Business; Advertising; World Wide Web; Marketing; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04141274174560243,"score_gpt":0.297918509331501,"score_spread":0.25650576758589855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58838576,0.000037681482,0.013207111,0.0023306434,0.001482704,0.00099364,0.00001857304,0.0002745289,0.39326936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789983,0.0000066216267,0.0014458793,0.006424623,0.0018580423,0.00005896336,0.000013804988,0.000027771359,0.0111659905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969603,0.00042979018,0.00035088853,0.0006541485,0.0007892553,0.0008156282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772584,0.00024311805,0.00008354786,0.0007495593,0.000118182856,0.001079756],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035450032,0.00023588976,0.00025179656,0.00011725624,0.0007389074,0.00035875122,0.0014764789,0.00018350012,0.00049795985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035600094,0.00015299804,0.000098121134,0.00057632755,0.0030382804,0.00056047615,0.00013919058,0.00040530914,0.00093207834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073141455,0.00027947914,0.0012074987,0.0000036031117,0.000014547071,0.00001625103,0.021961214,0.000006330589,0.00012550747,0.9607964,0.01340255,0.0021134375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046394594,0.00084618694,0.0040841987,0.00009497831,0.000027047989,0.000007052158,0.012345205,0.000094587835,0.0019694231,0.02487735,0.95438975,0.0008002821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054134857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030796394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94098717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022567323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010211437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767896693","doi":"","title":"Of Unreasonable Searches and Seizures: A Blueprint for a Constitutional Challenge to the Security of Canada Information Sharing Act","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint; Information sharing; Political science; Information security; Internet privacy; Computer security; Computer science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.025033924272024617,"score_gpt":0.27382342511677743,"score_spread":0.24878950084475282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767896693","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35874492,0.0011950404,0.0028394666,0.0049753604,0.0007405934,0.0022770509,0.00071401364,0.000028032975,0.6284855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99414307,0.0003244718,0.00011863832,0.000004529594,0.000029881809,9.842737e-7,0.00004904667,0.000001943484,0.0053274147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999319,0.000027680488,0.00008301468,0.00010911204,0.0003166209,0.00014453352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990568,0.00007976882,0.0002882783,0.000166543,0.00032855256,0.00008002354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040426626,0.00007573682,0.00020633887,0.000022497592,0.0006331813,0.000015970916,0.0003947467,0.00011252977,0.00041810123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012091421,0.00007387869,0.00005999144,0.000021331793,0.0016810155,0.00045322426,0.000045652272,0.000060629885,2.6210796e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019295527,0.00002295585,0.00016447055,0.00037576465,0.00009124971,7.467882e-7,0.23594768,0.000016498863,0.000007386859,0.75610304,0.0007201244,0.006357133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014989419,0.00021907288,0.039415862,0.00063820917,0.00022989958,9.3192284e-7,0.7756477,0.00061952963,0.00013690647,0.004410854,0.17669798,0.00048413122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9407136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7516922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026328478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015982084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61937714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W277796166","doi":"","title":"Obscurantism in Action: How the Ontario Human Rights Commission Frames Racial Profiling","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian ethnic studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Racism; Humanities; Sociology; Ethnology; Racial profiling; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Philosophy; Race (biology)","score_opus":0.1812501406239342,"score_gpt":0.3840557034588653,"score_spread":0.20280556283493112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W277796166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7670411,0.038885333,0.000109240136,0.031160781,0.0058455663,0.0016727498,0.000026317699,0.00019116508,0.15506776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95986855,0.00017363494,0.00003374473,0.00011359556,0.00095505937,0.000029394841,0.0000049886535,0.000007671934,0.038813382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986962,0.00017112457,0.00016574182,0.00021706228,0.00026240534,0.0004874309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993913,0.00014978118,0.00006436068,0.0001713646,0.000087410124,0.00013573807],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045717173,0.00013114288,0.00021141898,0.00010037313,0.0022032654,0.00004508772,0.00026310183,0.00014068467,0.00010637027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056897145,0.00008806589,0.000068056375,0.0002763513,0.0044136574,0.00017866874,0.000022451115,0.00031009206,0.000013256643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053420335,0.000028103606,0.008188278,0.000013800031,0.000063483276,0.00007178116,0.11443349,0.000008397257,0.00004213806,0.8428359,0.02631896,0.007990291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048998545,0.000030207211,0.14646733,0.00008683324,0.00003859255,0.0000016231653,0.016501037,0.0000033702752,0.00016820946,0.09409705,0.7417509,0.00036487659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92155534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7487389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009702968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040177754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782245308","doi":"","title":"Privacy In A Time Of No Privacy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Information privacy; Privacy software; Computer security; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.014261607258524904,"score_gpt":0.27602856045520846,"score_spread":0.2617669531966836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782245308","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65446544,0.0000071683844,0.00031466034,0.00082233944,0.00033453386,0.00017415348,0.0000012644407,0.000051175353,0.3438293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95628905,0.0000107295655,0.0012830273,0.00008556253,0.00023878165,0.00000307551,8.3559473e-7,0.0000044742105,0.042084448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992807,0.000037229325,0.00014294968,0.00011128472,0.00023938988,0.00018844414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995802,0.00007085683,0.000039581864,0.00018598202,0.00005489793,0.00006848816],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042788743,0.000047490943,0.0001094185,0.00004094558,0.00007266951,0.000024682902,0.0004123393,0.00008747308,0.0043767644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023118674,0.000035750698,0.00003773623,0.00016197143,0.002630165,0.00015868146,0.00005481834,0.00009928102,0.00062688574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008459708,0.00014526908,0.021154316,0.0000050913627,0.000004811584,0.0000023836353,0.015723715,1.0030867e-7,0.0056729945,0.9509346,0.0049399096,0.0014083388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084504264,0.00006124843,0.008655021,0.000015871283,0.0000072586463,6.2706926e-7,0.00034916197,0.00008464035,0.0026761617,0.06005456,0.92699105,0.00025935055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011563557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010094219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92205113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000130822045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010142912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785252287","doi":"","title":"Equal Participation and Campaign Finance: Comparative Perspectives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Election law; Political science; Law; Democracy; Cognitive reframing; Politics; Context (archaeology); Majority opinion","score_opus":0.02924541603720438,"score_gpt":0.34052885914488445,"score_spread":0.3112834431076801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785252287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89197123,0.00434713,0.08017063,0.001264529,0.000467819,0.00020228287,0.0000020787334,0.000049947903,0.021524351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99279803,0.0030411975,0.00006597406,0.00003520987,0.001411642,0.0000039220035,5.0304453e-7,0.000005622237,0.0026379155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792016,0.00022145898,0.00014650723,0.00015812884,0.00025481873,0.0012989411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994824,0.00007119806,0.00010772115,0.000066804714,0.00019152246,0.00008037473],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013716654,0.00008668699,0.00013769031,0.000046605444,0.0011963244,0.00009693731,0.00013829993,0.000062449115,0.00008673285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000071958544,0.00007041074,0.000041378706,0.00015762135,0.0053168163,0.0003415485,0.000013965536,0.0004857068,0.000039488907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028165376,0.00003525508,0.00062148296,4.330268e-7,0.00003189718,5.4983946e-7,0.06616239,0.0000011438813,0.000026976193,0.93069893,0.00017731864,0.0022154283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055478787,0.0006328569,0.0008277188,0.000011634289,0.00003101939,0.00001533195,0.13733795,0.000084599844,0.000083829385,0.8466037,0.013632157,0.00018441255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015714715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064910273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100826785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051228853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012529548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99739015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792629939","doi":"","title":"Consensus report on the Constitution: Charlottetown, August 28,1992: final text","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Genealogy; Geography; History; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.034681562544418516,"score_gpt":0.24904898100432518,"score_spread":0.21436741845990667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792629939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012345974,0.00013306514,0.000032628235,0.021236818,0.0011515756,0.00044946533,0.00013688588,0.000056784822,0.9644568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8008843,0.0005727289,0.00006424666,0.0016153853,0.0014914472,0.000038773494,0.000007877863,0.000019269879,0.19530597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979787,0.00016305117,0.00041474283,0.00033288507,0.00049865956,0.0006119918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813193,0.00045647073,0.00020366121,0.00050162245,0.0001320339,0.00057427323],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007728565,0.0001811826,0.00025378662,0.00020036708,0.0007719655,0.00004459373,0.0004315995,0.00017615092,0.0016097896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061005086,0.00010985379,0.00012145881,0.00021974815,0.010940257,0.00012369243,0.000020576626,0.00013681555,0.00018797697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008870551,0.000010554301,0.0013084216,0.0000029858033,0.000017487526,0.00022120369,0.0004414068,2.1822835e-7,0.000008742902,0.84740746,0.14793676,0.0026358976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026786685,0.0000402031,0.0010037088,0.00006007108,0.000022054186,0.000029281042,0.00021054596,2.5632752e-7,0.00004574445,0.01203961,0.9860734,0.00020727159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30866733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6565043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8381366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002782487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002862463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99930286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793931921","doi":"10.11575/prism/33972","title":"American and Canadian Election Laws","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Election law; Voting; Politics","score_opus":0.009326282788177633,"score_gpt":0.20346051201636503,"score_spread":0.1941342292281874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793931921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57729375,0.0003136228,0.10464346,0.003088257,0.00041088703,0.0002128237,7.5066777e-7,0.00007497918,0.3139615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99068946,0.00018086753,0.0026114823,0.00007329101,0.000053440996,6.0162876e-8,0.0000016464902,0.000002916835,0.0063868235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995145,0.000051903204,0.0000287452,0.00007123268,0.000107363485,0.00022623096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995779,0.000018344104,0.000037436683,0.000057484278,0.000024340368,0.00028452167],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015832797,0.000036240384,0.00007924309,0.00006926323,0.0004604215,0.0000073177807,0.00009104275,0.000044376557,0.00014989576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010475331,0.0000426895,0.000025228175,0.00013197176,0.0035007969,0.00024144721,0.000014135496,0.00005317888,0.000017297756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012747496,0.000046703055,0.05578491,0.000005954382,0.000030321253,0.0000060501616,0.03946507,1.9796989e-8,0.000063303094,0.60088754,0.005971408,0.29772598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019314367,0.000036773657,0.058793537,0.0000037211228,0.00002923456,9.22743e-7,0.002275634,0.0001257727,0.000019097772,0.00163526,0.93675447,0.00013243083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6474394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22746119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93078303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089794674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010416012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796203741","doi":"","title":"Canada Update: A Case Involving Limitations on Free Speech; the Articling Problem and Proposed Solution; A Summary of Legislative and Upcoming Regulatory Changes: Hydrofracking, Wiretapping, and Self-Defense","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Free speech; Self defense; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.027867719171851026,"score_gpt":0.2238435181567415,"score_spread":0.19597579898489048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796203741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.986596,0.000652478,0.0014622447,0.002102631,0.000079356025,0.0008358067,0.000058902697,0.000070366834,0.008142238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98429704,0.000269973,0.013529815,0.00015415507,0.00007147267,0.0000018754866,0.0000026462471,0.000017856175,0.0016551733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979486,0.0009704555,0.00016433431,0.00033044472,0.00028500523,0.00030116047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985909,0.0005584252,0.00021278323,0.00026129157,0.00018966846,0.00018693338],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014859156,0.00015785836,0.00021184368,0.00014222368,0.0019685775,0.0001500554,0.00020405234,0.00010397943,0.000013782725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042897317,0.00013220284,0.00003370603,0.0003543046,0.0024908627,0.00050360785,0.00015275297,0.0003150882,0.0000011242582],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011395647,0.00019864456,0.01805249,0.00022812716,0.0005133605,0.00061277294,0.4190703,0.00002676359,0.002655844,0.53719735,0.00085032015,0.020480057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005613638,0.0004594861,0.0029763805,0.000857222,0.001169911,0.00018383279,0.7295332,0.0058340263,0.0013118739,0.044173993,0.20583306,0.0020533693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20907044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5341971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4930234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017402675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033038837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798124662","doi":"10.11575/prism/33921","title":"The Edmonton Journal and Freedom of the Press in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of the press; Freedom of information; Political science; Media studies; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.009826635608312598,"score_gpt":0.18517741066867882,"score_spread":0.17535077506036623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798124662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9149513,0.0037210863,0.009258519,0.0037923052,0.001160205,0.00029178377,0.000001043053,0.0000069738953,0.06681675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961687,0.00073516526,0.0003133075,0.000014874897,0.000043019456,4.7698602e-8,9.383111e-8,0.0000019115428,0.0027229316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932253,0.00013115507,0.00006478591,0.00004317867,0.00026683926,0.00017151488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995919,0.000097926124,0.000100099256,0.00009210886,0.000037674123,0.00008030048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040218726,0.000034839937,0.00008107346,0.000013144908,0.0005041045,0.000008369001,0.00033617424,0.000035855,0.000026147824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029817422,0.000023505692,0.00003150054,0.000063934436,0.0025706303,0.00017717818,0.00006917448,0.000112635214,2.0889188e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081620936,0.000098414406,0.22756836,0.0000255795,0.00008127274,0.000012648297,0.08641489,0.0000021121389,0.00013991981,0.5720468,0.02263183,0.09089653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012385414,0.000031853855,0.40530413,0.00005945983,0.00007495671,0.0000047323842,0.0138522405,0.0010032246,0.00010704925,0.006877933,0.57122743,0.00021845245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8918243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84301347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56516886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011292494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003732497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94715947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806466280","doi":"","title":"Exploring the Censorship of Jay Asher’s Thirteen Reasons Why","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; History; Internet privacy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08383666709585202,"score_gpt":0.2697912877471279,"score_spread":0.18595462065127588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806466280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3774404,0.00021510306,0.0022302691,0.006543284,0.0006196019,0.00022143767,0.000010288455,0.00007986839,0.6126398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865031,0.0003861701,0.0004724501,0.000032122018,0.00024267184,1.6385714e-7,7.148729e-7,0.0000053169947,0.01235726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990407,0.0001860129,0.00006144233,0.000150834,0.0003255175,0.00023547781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999217,0.000118319214,0.000121225035,0.0002871501,0.00016181773,0.00009451151],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005142879,0.0000734846,0.00015920041,0.000017365748,0.00067993434,0.000012083533,0.0005680456,0.000063908745,0.006666609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005609501,0.000065274384,0.000102260776,0.00009517736,0.0069545014,0.0006955849,0.000081450904,0.00006398271,0.000033123473],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009278409,0.00006724807,0.0022798781,0.00001530204,0.00008042489,0.0000043716113,0.39487186,0.0000010679607,0.00025094856,0.5798734,0.008205909,0.0142568275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009576045,0.00034736987,0.15277454,0.000107414366,0.00017169844,0.0000010241862,0.46311682,0.000046910805,0.0003865622,0.0018125504,0.379862,0.00041549982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27926296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34827965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60906273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013638638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008003582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810014282","doi":"","title":"OBSTACLES TO CROSSING THE DISCRIMINATION THRESHOLD: CONNECTING INDIVIDUAL EXCLUSION TO GROUP-BASED INEQUALITIES","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Prima facie; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Prejudice (legal term); Presumption; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.09414513416010219,"score_gpt":0.34463123741232127,"score_spread":0.2504861032522191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810014282","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1923832,0.053345986,0.0091436915,0.6650532,0.004006564,0.008267449,0.0002886717,0.0003448995,0.067166366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715962,0.00036731872,0.0001449738,0.02649284,0.0007933177,0.000037974998,0.000013415778,0.00001637554,0.0005376187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998338,0.00038585532,0.00023532272,0.00019403707,0.00040297842,0.00044382174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889743,0.000217535,0.000076447686,0.0003263002,0.00013854036,0.0003437247],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029628545,0.00011694801,0.00017810219,0.00006258232,0.0052065104,0.00054240495,0.00066357054,0.00005125362,0.0003729531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007144953,0.000066339846,0.000069298054,0.00043805555,0.0026919823,0.00014175288,0.00005806681,0.00010443074,0.00016426979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002874646,0.000006075476,0.00015065908,0.00012102607,0.000009850647,0.0000023477212,0.06396823,0.0000032297903,0.000009983795,0.86732,0.01157925,0.056826472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068570014,0.00004224681,0.0006234706,0.001207333,0.000049114744,8.955863e-7,0.0036737118,0.000011730975,0.00002130745,0.004837391,0.98928654,0.00017766339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15136944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8871092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9777073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030667658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055434456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99608856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W282048792","doi":"","title":"Locating the Mislaid Gate: Revitalizing Tinker by Repairing Judicial Overgeneralizations of Technologically Enabled Student Speech","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Humiliation; Lawsuit; Tinker; Media studies; Art; Sociology; Art history; Political science","score_opus":0.022980525273595384,"score_gpt":0.27645351797139595,"score_spread":0.25347299269780055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W282048792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84035796,0.0046138046,0.009192171,0.003986226,0.001155376,0.0014836353,0.00003024513,0.00089062913,0.13828996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914341,0.0006853621,0.0013972917,0.00038690367,0.00054262637,0.000033605153,0.0000098005785,0.000022387827,0.005487915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764645,0.00023522224,0.0005287501,0.0003617022,0.0007398255,0.00048804504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881476,0.0001219986,0.00026095548,0.00044814622,0.00022073429,0.00013338002],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096775277,0.00017301438,0.0002960332,0.00004229617,0.0019290556,0.000084248924,0.0006965948,0.00019731067,0.0004545196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004820394,0.00012612068,0.00014059893,0.0006230315,0.0046324786,0.0002704516,0.00014468218,0.00026614193,0.000060142043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009018652,0.00016386354,0.012828033,0.000019557263,0.000055711873,0.000025134226,0.003701315,0.00010616887,0.003552983,0.964596,0.014446997,0.00049524463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018920702,0.0002804517,0.0020659214,0.00038811887,0.00020024645,0.000038663555,0.008601333,0.00026192315,0.017426066,0.032354858,0.9351239,0.0013664555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030084935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017529643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93224114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012670639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014632942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890681678","doi":"","title":"The \"Privilege of Speech\" in a \"Pleasantly Authoritarian Country\": How Canada's Judiciary Allowed Laws Proscribing Discourse Critical of Homosexuality to Trump Free Speech and Religious Liberty","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vanderbilt journal of transnational law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Privilege (computing); Law; Political science; Homosexuality; Free speech; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.015571917943953326,"score_gpt":0.28784146575535335,"score_spread":0.2722695478114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890681678","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.415593,0.0019001003,0.0050891587,0.56763005,0.0014211172,0.00094328506,0.00050451537,0.000022491777,0.006896295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971143,0.00011878292,0.0020053447,0.00027898114,0.000381919,0.000002893372,0.0000032120038,0.000012681325,0.00008187691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969754,0.0002933473,0.00074258837,0.00019303062,0.0014258808,0.00036975366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979094,0.0009133277,0.00024444982,0.00018967204,0.0004870949,0.0002560133],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021804231,0.00015417852,0.00041312815,0.000089652,0.00040922125,0.00008418543,0.0005443419,0.00012240642,0.000022054683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049320137,0.000110313056,0.000103203725,0.00028391305,0.00390177,0.0004089782,0.00002893112,0.00030794842,1.020344e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014611421,0.00015981638,0.0011258211,0.00002623543,0.000050563835,0.000039859595,0.0028893228,0.00003642619,0.00034886634,0.9926439,0.0015312536,0.001001852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008156437,0.0010473877,0.022390064,0.00059632654,0.00043740793,0.00026656463,0.016012508,0.0005163619,0.0041829394,0.70103884,0.24411695,0.0012382066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042523615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8652056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82268196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021420453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012690874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99880904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896066287","doi":"","title":"Trashcans and Constitutional Custodians: The Liminal Spaces of Privacy in the Wake of Patrick","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Expectation of privacy; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Constitutional law; Charter; Constitutional court; Privacy policy; Right to privacy; The Right to Privacy; Information privacy; Sociology; Constitution; Human rights","score_opus":0.013049852097072512,"score_gpt":0.2651364226690756,"score_spread":0.2520865705720031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896066287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9213235,0.014463798,0.023468276,0.029267322,0.0002508346,0.00047116014,0.000010011463,0.0000130376575,0.010732091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99282116,0.0066451905,0.000033478413,0.00009250671,0.00022965997,0.0000010339916,4.2793778e-7,0.0000016673697,0.0001748917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837375,0.00022430466,0.00022714389,0.00008159802,0.0003855929,0.0007076105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994921,0.00016935346,0.00015488682,0.000086068176,0.000062532825,0.000035041223],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025854679,0.00006971748,0.00013052097,0.000059742342,0.00036568564,0.00003703147,0.00038074038,0.000054678196,0.000018739103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010077402,0.000036594403,0.00006872928,0.00024679513,0.008856175,0.0001477207,0.0000072177622,0.0005958378,8.552069e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001745639,0.000058467205,0.003001728,0.0000015172367,0.000015556072,0.0000015188472,0.008575516,0.000006609344,0.00005036853,0.97954893,0.00006468992,0.0086576445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008236419,0.0004742089,0.0057224534,0.000032793414,0.0000633527,0.00019543669,0.04149598,0.000014026563,0.00004977343,0.9302797,0.020720288,0.00012838854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018668472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021542255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07149768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012957054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020974213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898470522","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3293","title":"Narrating Dignity: Islamophobia, Racial Profiling, and National Security Before the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Bombardier (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Islamophobia; Dignity; Supreme court; Political science; Racial profiling; Law; Racism; Profiling (computer programming); Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies; Politics; Race (biology); Computer science","score_opus":0.015757145107875122,"score_gpt":0.26223610660637453,"score_spread":0.2464789614984994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898470522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12912071,0.0002342292,0.00071324775,0.0056352676,0.0019789012,0.00034377744,0.000071220136,0.00002873757,0.8618739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99631935,0.000015542375,0.0002249528,0.00030514647,0.0026601588,0.000002222533,0.0000025023162,0.0000086322725,0.00046148244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800086,0.00024919256,0.000297846,0.0001398087,0.00096963637,0.00034266463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987719,0.00010165902,0.00024612673,0.00008704233,0.0006379615,0.00015528078],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019479309,0.000103946375,0.00016093439,0.00002104497,0.0030392883,0.00015456964,0.00030552875,0.000087027656,0.00024015833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025072866,0.00007183515,0.000054928914,0.0001087751,0.005163529,0.0002792665,0.000045830027,0.00030182867,0.0000016891801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011761098,0.000023295443,0.0033184125,0.000006031613,0.000029525854,0.0000058614055,0.015541133,0.0000014273878,0.000046723864,0.9782152,0.002579239,0.00022139182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006627237,0.00014411967,0.00044464276,0.00005805642,0.00003041498,0.00007716719,0.009672141,0.00034475664,0.0008067771,0.9447296,0.042805642,0.00022391308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44125655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99408054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86719865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015693913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011628853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899508936","doi":"","title":"Oral History Interview: Michael Zaleski (1172)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Defense attorney; Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.04667475235259733,"score_gpt":0.2657093542941508,"score_spread":0.2190346019415535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899508936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016467666,0.002191917,0.011498414,0.006073465,0.0034180565,0.0004173262,0.0000014706543,0.0003338776,0.9595978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5041055,0.00021848708,0.000961259,0.0028351466,0.0005905158,0.000026268784,0.0000026735415,0.0000127347475,0.4912474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906236,0.00012398735,0.00014388621,0.00016521552,0.00021693339,0.0002876369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999524,0.000038515882,0.000040336716,0.00016662656,0.00008201882,0.00014850065],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033802175,0.000079313446,0.0001261773,0.000036129575,0.00016510412,0.00003949868,0.00031335643,0.00008595908,0.022639785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031939424,0.000059308066,0.00007826418,0.00006589979,0.0046773967,0.00033688132,0.000040888917,0.00007416756,0.0035031997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.3135496e-7,0.00003062855,0.00028538602,0.0000035162498,0.0000068877735,0.000001317597,0.00936896,5.2061704e-8,0.000050777162,0.52233714,0.45888653,0.009028187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012029777,0.000017295875,0.00020117479,0.0000053679923,0.00000530498,3.9296984e-7,0.002025695,0.000021542002,0.00002001311,0.013603492,0.9838601,0.00011936581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006502494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052939295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5249735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023586977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010071308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899888614","doi":"10.29173/psur6","title":"Mandatory Voting: The Wrong Response to Low Voter Turnout","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Voting; Political science; Voter turnout; Democracy; Population; Public administration; Disapproval voting; Demographic economics; Politics; Political economy; Economics; Law; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.05329926684197198,"score_gpt":0.3616219751488923,"score_spread":0.3083227083069203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899888614","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008448856,0.010196066,0.013160182,0.8823794,0.001994356,0.0021003569,0.000013228831,0.00030450543,0.081403024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808809,0.0011873678,0.00022658876,0.01408055,0.00045170964,0.00003206104,7.391081e-7,0.000012918364,0.003127147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948284,0.0009219276,0.0004013647,0.0005084746,0.0016407788,0.00169906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964602,0.00052112597,0.000080309175,0.00052936544,0.00036620485,0.0020428014],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011633932,0.00018696142,0.00032635985,0.00008429659,0.0011450647,0.00032934576,0.0013882245,0.00006126448,0.00007561942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065703904,0.000108887965,0.00013444554,0.0013137561,0.019645184,0.0004793985,0.00022804497,0.00021704522,0.0010787102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001290822,0.000029866442,0.000129238,0.000049810053,0.000003137627,0.0000066202265,0.00064764323,6.1559035e-7,0.000015429678,0.992442,0.0046191537,0.0020435893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025053698,0.00014482853,0.0005590357,0.0011652554,0.000060399605,0.000016234406,0.00075515755,0.000059867252,0.00006624792,0.1498678,0.8465992,0.00045540428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045617437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021260296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9724321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007169336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018293142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901959319","doi":"10.30958/ajl.2-4-1","title":"The “Right” to Privacy? - The Debate over the United States Government’s Control over its Cyberspace","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Athens Journal of Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Stony Brook University; York University","keywords":"Cyberspace; Government (linguistics); Internet privacy; Control (management); Political science; Public administration; Computer security; Business; The Internet; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.015826127858152957,"score_gpt":0.2703113973673847,"score_spread":0.2544852695092317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901959319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6493732,0.0014214368,0.008955822,0.31194922,0.0028322227,0.0011073601,0.00009895737,0.00005604295,0.02420576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840953,0.0008526956,0.00001566122,0.004851686,0.00079088093,0.000004524258,1.6514585e-7,0.000016621736,0.009372499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975211,0.00044623323,0.00033044338,0.000120489945,0.0011271944,0.00045452116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968585,0.0020224776,0.00038739142,0.00033046032,0.00021957193,0.0001816171],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020286702,0.00014399903,0.00018649077,0.000018008453,0.0015819407,0.00027055645,0.001110688,0.00006310757,0.00027138507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027462095,0.000043945303,0.00018133363,0.00019629586,0.0046604746,0.00029149425,0.000068747875,0.00019429508,0.000057115492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010286491,0.000032298172,0.0002855588,8.0155536e-7,0.00016287321,0.000015151967,0.019447574,0.000016044978,0.00049441407,0.9616259,0.017368477,0.00044807355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008083339,0.00008322021,0.00044635564,0.000035047608,0.000064396176,0.0000092963055,0.0011178533,0.000016891245,0.00018872824,0.021901978,0.97522354,0.00010433359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034992985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00109536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9578551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020004294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009059057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903123368","doi":"","title":"Suicide In Law Enforcement: Protecting Those Who Serve","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Calhoun: The Naval Postgraduate School Institutional Archive (Naval Postgraduate School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law enforcement; Computer security; Business; Law; Enforcement; Internet privacy; Criminology; Political science; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.043855384850459714,"score_gpt":0.317889980942153,"score_spread":0.2740345960916933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903123368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5207611,0.0024725562,0.024032502,0.028601374,0.0086901225,0.011719104,0.0012656967,0.001742603,0.40071493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98389715,0.00063654536,0.0010666423,0.003362368,0.0048997113,0.0002743891,0.00023473437,0.000115496165,0.005512985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98934305,0.002248369,0.0016630497,0.0016108861,0.0026085912,0.0025260805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949427,0.0007490177,0.00060787814,0.0011992583,0.0010399728,0.0014611306],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005031215,0.0010352414,0.00097479176,0.00053725013,0.0073758014,0.0009400419,0.0024816692,0.00042347584,0.000510245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003014917,0.0008049222,0.0006624166,0.0017739063,0.034381066,0.0021442797,0.0007105521,0.002869659,0.0028464417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000781644,0.0002613434,0.0032049243,0.000056823334,0.00019789544,0.00015458415,0.005611281,0.0003138562,0.0014918641,0.9819959,0.003072392,0.0028575151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007092185,0.0013735165,0.008944204,0.0023956725,0.0003249227,0.0002758136,0.004948541,0.0026791506,0.0045864773,0.6967012,0.26714918,0.0035290963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031805564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021434378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46313602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001280499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002565354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2926861112","doi":"10.7202/1058192ar","title":"Law Enforcement Access to Encrypted Data: Legislative Responses and the Charter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Encryption; Enforcement; Charter; Law enforcement; Law; Legislature; Perpetuity; Context (archaeology); Computer security; Internet privacy; Political science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.07273824518349938,"score_gpt":0.34704594891788465,"score_spread":0.2743077037343853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2926861112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046812785,0.00012084928,0.0007754061,0.007183919,0.0012359594,0.00058979436,0.00008917404,0.000030967363,0.9852927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99301565,0.00015726665,0.00010382205,0.0026911907,0.00053521997,0.000005780638,0.0000032683777,0.0000090678195,0.0034787392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828315,0.00042689065,0.0002354713,0.00021753188,0.0004969952,0.00033993775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892545,0.0003107273,0.00012173347,0.00033342827,0.00011364085,0.00019502449],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019755382,0.00010902631,0.00019383813,0.000035228346,0.0037984059,0.0005110076,0.0008758459,0.000057172143,0.00090063707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000733213,0.000062158535,0.000047431928,0.00012605145,0.0036482634,0.0012623516,0.00026516526,0.00021031394,0.00010311391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020367668,0.000013188412,0.00009754803,0.0000017376997,0.00003867657,0.0000066208536,0.003949469,0.0000028608695,0.000013149733,0.9938971,0.0009897873,0.00078620313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010673226,0.000056989047,0.00006378899,0.00002347935,0.000021799935,0.000013136107,0.0010339299,0.000027494429,0.00006929145,0.010689605,0.9868143,0.00011882943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043339888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018807296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98833436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059231388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023201894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W293994410","doi":"","title":"Agents of Repression: Withstanding the Test of Time","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Justice A Journal of Crime Conflict & World Order","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Law; Prison; Government (linguistics); Test (biology); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04412943831105571,"score_gpt":0.34032038985000596,"score_spread":0.29619095153895025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W293994410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08161759,0.00624645,0.008917139,0.0079941265,0.0051983017,0.001077313,0.00004466189,0.000065981076,0.88883847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98115003,0.0003049464,0.00044255724,0.00036175753,0.0011625501,0.0000015193355,4.2768187e-7,0.000020065845,0.01655617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997624,0.00039504608,0.0007018214,0.00012354585,0.00084632315,0.0003092698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966851,0.0009820315,0.0010332388,0.00016011603,0.0010185861,0.000120931385],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018329406,0.00013504864,0.00043527503,0.00012656902,0.00067083683,0.00004849274,0.00046107126,0.00009356385,0.001551793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022763347,0.000090955604,0.00021195336,0.0007435226,0.0042013763,0.00023562387,0.000032668195,0.00029075128,0.000010790974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026830338,0.00066379947,0.0043250103,0.00018471282,0.0004557989,0.000052408606,0.14173867,0.000052288753,0.005683452,0.78332424,0.061290324,0.0019609886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032318807,0.0003305239,0.002336954,0.0005298748,0.0024019408,0.000024602923,0.037387688,0.000033018958,0.00426906,0.012569194,0.9363484,0.0005369054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000076437536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047843136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89953244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006496012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005320416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945103424","doi":"","title":"Youth Agency and the Culture of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Law; Political science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.03331488264837214,"score_gpt":0.253395015211292,"score_spread":0.22008013256291986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945103424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04136684,0.0013840254,0.0007877123,0.0010338242,0.00014235817,0.00013659203,0.000009815539,0.000021738124,0.9551171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872451,0.0003975682,0.00023901553,0.000019750238,0.000044608772,2.4940908e-8,9.979401e-7,0.0000016587917,0.0120513085],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994938,0.00009969574,0.000033950935,0.00007907591,0.00019582,0.00009766594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962217,0.00002082545,0.0000712233,0.00011127204,0.00009172742,0.00008279088],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031169434,0.00004188748,0.00012323169,0.0000045388,0.00024568354,0.000007048353,0.00021760988,0.000060723152,0.00075052364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017100458,0.000031974745,0.000048294532,0.000027691736,0.00772634,0.00027234398,0.000050812607,0.00003347268,0.0000032910475],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003295868,0.0000094471,0.00007894198,0.0000025906165,0.000011034815,6.270086e-7,0.51406795,2.7304264e-7,0.000005734333,0.48466188,0.00042033682,0.000708192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021712277,0.000088194596,0.0022462816,0.000016322483,0.00010944324,3.5686062e-7,0.95631444,0.000021474014,0.000014192249,0.007188293,0.03170338,0.00012636943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4155795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15743892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9458782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005122961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050518196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947337155","doi":"10.36643/mjrl.24.2.virtual","title":"Virtual Hatred: How Russia Tried to Start a Race War in the United States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Journal of Race & Law","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre for Engineering Research and Development; McGill University","keywords":"Hatred; Politics; Presidential election; Democracy; Racism; Political science; Nationalism; Xenophobia; Presidential system; Law; Public opinion; Persona; Sociology","score_opus":0.0141151370943991,"score_gpt":0.2579790512883151,"score_spread":0.243863914193916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947337155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96212286,0.00023627075,0.0010323294,0.03405563,0.0006414052,0.0003155276,0.00001301252,0.000017808177,0.0015651324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922718,0.000221268,0.00024257576,0.0026686064,0.00042066572,0.0000020280563,0.000005722366,0.00001727156,0.004150106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976792,0.0006034508,0.0003696613,0.00016849262,0.000734713,0.00044453127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998749,0.0003590961,0.00028983082,0.00023790007,0.00016775665,0.00019642054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020979473,0.00015920913,0.00035083416,0.00018306816,0.00033209004,0.000223262,0.00079952634,0.00009874153,0.00014737005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010614871,0.00009954297,0.00013712332,0.0006889858,0.0018603965,0.0005020248,0.00003548482,0.00036563145,0.000052166404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061719643,0.00029740098,0.003214945,0.00001180907,0.00010421306,0.00016151887,0.40652803,0.00092577975,0.0012912636,0.56255746,0.02338139,0.0009089936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015441177,0.00045532113,0.0002759572,0.00007615372,0.000034082204,0.000018456594,0.081059955,0.000048029295,0.00034489235,0.0039736177,0.9119534,0.0002160532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043693566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068322704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.888572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006596142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019514619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6854708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954009616","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1368","title":"B.C. Freedom of Information and Privacy Assn. v. British Columbia (Attorney General): Mandatory Registration Rules, and Limits on Third Party Political Expression under the Charter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Charter; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Dilemma; Democracy","score_opus":0.02213353209609633,"score_gpt":0.26596642299843887,"score_spread":0.24383289090234253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954009616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7305519,0.061402563,0.0017806788,0.018847289,0.0020117776,0.007441217,0.00037657126,0.00026362055,0.17732441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568144,0.0357937,0.0002440962,0.0045479406,0.0003652874,0.000043542164,0.000088217894,0.0000148193985,0.0020880091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841785,0.0002712119,0.0003960692,0.00019419042,0.00045643674,0.00026425708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911356,0.00010946754,0.0001905104,0.0003064528,0.00014038927,0.00013959917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095785654,0.00010061506,0.0002852031,0.000010982816,0.00035527427,0.00029714272,0.0001953465,0.00012040484,0.00024317166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007623486,0.00008866176,0.00005998076,0.0000646508,0.0020406058,0.00072343263,0.000045987155,0.00013510727,0.00003082204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054271627,0.00003062175,0.0018832847,0.0005664335,0.000012686507,6.489851e-7,0.0003320575,2.102713e-7,0.000043807515,0.96022964,0.035264403,0.0016307633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004699141,0.00009043806,0.0066843373,0.002217801,0.00005940712,0.000007539285,0.00016087136,0.000023819945,0.000027815542,0.011512284,0.97854114,0.000204645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052226367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060098153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94871736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044674773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000095323754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78950995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963043698","doi":"10.29173/alr2543","title":"Reconstitutions of Harm: Novel Applications of the Labaye Test Since 2005","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Supreme court; Circumstantial evidence; Test (biology); Normative; Construct (python library); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.021781613755822563,"score_gpt":0.2902567064906436,"score_spread":0.26847509273482106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963043698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003264838,0.036005404,0.0016280595,0.01550777,0.00048452205,0.0030180374,0.00010792685,0.0000251208,0.94289666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86012745,0.0700277,0.0008813618,0.003674909,0.00029690223,0.00023303927,0.000019520294,0.00002286785,0.06471624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991654,0.000055281846,0.00030144065,0.0001408494,0.00018411351,0.0001528865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986867,0.00047937574,0.0002102735,0.00045920076,0.00011300347,0.00005144718],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035140457,0.000068908405,0.000239531,0.000009187112,0.00021589028,0.000008824496,0.00044435103,0.000047464793,0.0006434594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019388318,0.000044619996,0.00013061664,0.00033400263,0.004468047,0.00012171408,0.000038974373,0.00006563166,0.00021692397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.1106669e-7,0.000077641955,0.0007613657,0.00024427447,0.00000918252,1.0702833e-8,0.00014111713,3.8583767e-7,0.00008474444,0.99677694,0.0012864125,0.00061773864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007651701,0.0000056231693,0.00005351614,0.0007639049,0.000058623827,9.124385e-7,0.000022284494,0.0000016320346,0.00008165195,0.0012538431,0.9976157,0.00006579827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062962957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015467111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025106756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000207883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99824125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2987270352","doi":"","title":"Free Speech, Reputation, and the Canadian Balance","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Free speech; Reputation; Linguistics; Business; Political science; Psychology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009206030735952568,"score_gpt":0.23278469886632003,"score_spread":0.22357866813036745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2987270352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046503942,0.0018886139,0.00066585327,0.02934774,0.0012209946,0.0007195234,0.00007383039,0.0001869673,0.9193925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97541094,0.00006509572,0.00042653235,0.0015793472,0.0011343458,0.000014850758,0.000009031521,0.0000106205325,0.021349242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998778,0.0001549884,0.00016901905,0.00021313586,0.00031956003,0.0003653144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991839,0.000116698546,0.0000602989,0.00030755228,0.00009463475,0.0002369191],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075539044,0.00009122365,0.00013208187,0.000027376178,0.0015973618,0.00033173882,0.0003558988,0.00010319886,0.00032897675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018716625,0.00006502062,0.000045334054,0.00018652908,0.0073253326,0.00026669475,0.000025556406,0.00014410488,0.00010369768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049059445,0.0000053232716,0.004485423,0.0000018736101,0.000005093698,0.000009684874,0.0006659213,0.00000424166,0.000002697523,0.97143734,0.023141515,0.0002359865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000675702,0.000006229982,0.002372937,0.000007603789,0.000010678668,0.0000027506037,0.00025379195,0.000023230925,0.000024451652,0.37174377,0.6247597,0.00011918202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85041964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9834093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.928907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001313337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029657324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990557264","doi":"10.21991/cf29389","title":"Advocacy Notwithstanding the Notwithstanding Clause","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Paradigm shift; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Frame (networking); Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02057622548626431,"score_gpt":0.2752041373246879,"score_spread":0.2546279118384236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990557264","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020373581,0.0013326152,0.47997922,0.018925982,0.011664502,0.0023748546,0.00021149032,0.0006643458,0.4644734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916122,0.00018502909,0.00044535263,0.0016663499,0.00062067254,0.00004806386,0.000047977275,0.00001825301,0.0053560846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959124,0.00020176505,0.0006532274,0.00068471575,0.0012028129,0.0013451148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977356,0.0005928458,0.0002796122,0.00061744975,0.00039519503,0.00037926855],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012178902,0.00040302877,0.00043381896,0.0002415259,0.00551218,0.00042407255,0.00089098193,0.00032404452,0.0016171319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054634496,0.0003011374,0.00034620057,0.0007791452,0.059284884,0.00133519,0.00020704757,0.0005203826,0.0014613848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006260921,0.000063629195,0.03596553,0.000012610475,0.000082095015,0.000018603396,0.0013438414,0.00026105208,0.00012419799,0.95615226,0.0055622933,0.00035130855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019167921,0.0000645707,0.00020296148,0.00022525532,0.0000877757,0.00009657494,0.016942188,0.00039506814,0.00014802872,0.10112401,0.87805766,0.0007391192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002688165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005059341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9712386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007610755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003357789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999015995","doi":"10.29173/mlj1108","title":"Flaming Misogyny or Blindly Zealous Enforcement? The Bizarre Case of R v George","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"George (robot); Enforcement; Art; Law; Political science; Art history","score_opus":0.02540600826324478,"score_gpt":0.2848632776084346,"score_spread":0.2594572693451898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999015995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9042951,0.0002941398,0.00085486704,0.00084802916,0.0032302365,0.00046326965,0.000011271321,0.000043391366,0.08995973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99510854,0.00011139418,0.00010202812,0.0002703326,0.0013713344,0.0000023150733,0.0000010399593,0.000015225667,0.0030177785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983094,0.00021937296,0.00038394696,0.00014586793,0.00049059425,0.0004508438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896246,0.00019738809,0.0002771841,0.00023537196,0.00017271613,0.00015485012],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001232111,0.00012830729,0.0002118477,0.00005475124,0.0016222628,0.00022040756,0.0004833362,0.0001047031,0.002074194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054509124,0.00007348474,0.00014009957,0.00019980308,0.0024688698,0.00030721497,0.000058295507,0.00031878374,0.0001341518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006975842,0.00007321458,0.0016068665,0.000019852869,0.000085703876,0.0009227158,0.011917246,0.000023685569,0.00009169927,0.9693568,0.0015621254,0.014270367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021589,0.00038456777,0.00012615656,0.000114095135,0.00014294761,0.0031972975,0.18119432,0.00016493762,0.00045143982,0.020488072,0.79112697,0.0004503028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027136521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21328077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9488687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104812345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015273035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999382501","doi":"10.54119/alr.qnkm8281","title":"Unchartered Territory for the \"Bluegrass State\": Lessons to be Learned from Over a Quarter-Century of State Charter School Legislation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arkansas law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Legislation; Quarter (Canadian coin); Charter; Political science; History; Law; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04937956011769515,"score_gpt":0.32420581083099675,"score_spread":0.2748262507133016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999382501","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25673696,0.22878651,0.058292545,0.32886785,0.018901395,0.050601438,0.005884625,0.0010783128,0.050850347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9294683,0.047786716,0.00038350455,0.015040823,0.0007913103,0.00044865755,0.0001449354,0.000072914605,0.005862879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785984,0.00032930486,0.0005032977,0.00039686385,0.00048804772,0.00042266186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984518,0.00036170543,0.00025755208,0.00059080916,0.00015104256,0.00018705969],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010210329,0.00019915975,0.00049026153,0.00003116175,0.00030092124,0.000095905496,0.00047640034,0.0000751267,0.0009259553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055828474,0.00013392014,0.00025535384,0.00018529494,0.00092235516,0.0004106457,0.00003288474,0.00014056006,0.00021724148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027425398,0.0004765317,0.0024115015,0.001950448,0.0007150177,0.0000056780145,0.05165946,0.000024063702,0.0023137492,0.70231265,0.09745537,0.14040127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005581605,0.00010462386,0.0003569375,0.0007981006,0.0000970825,1.8366228e-7,0.0004352151,0.000037069338,0.00005132093,0.005652483,0.9916869,0.00022192244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003217778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006081759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89423156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000084680636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014960926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W299939199","doi":"","title":"La Migra in the Mirror: Immigration Enforcement, Racial Profiling, and the Psychology of One Mexican Chasing after Another","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albany law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racial profiling; Immigration; Law enforcement; Law; Criminology; Population; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Enforcement; Profiling (computer programming); Immigration law; Gender studies; Race (biology); Demography","score_opus":0.02874774233683494,"score_gpt":0.34512731950447856,"score_spread":0.31637957716764364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W299939199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10863739,0.3686094,0.0017301218,0.104430944,0.0004576306,0.0075994013,0.000018220428,0.00008283491,0.40843406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9556992,0.035152715,0.00011111224,0.0087999115,0.00006924133,0.000045587632,0.000002283554,0.0000039645183,0.0001159776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985151,0.00070517417,0.00028212616,0.00013788171,0.00019633592,0.00016334381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952096,0.000111115434,0.00013139512,0.00018999606,0.000027214235,0.000019345207],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020179464,0.000080170896,0.00023667952,0.00001519221,0.0001475145,0.000026932086,0.00019457568,0.00006159448,0.000103189035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041588075,0.000041501942,0.0000761586,0.00017310899,0.0033525815,0.000101910795,0.000008214121,0.00009809112,0.0000057172565],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026727375,0.000045572062,0.00019653112,0.000058750637,0.000007767408,0.0000010245196,0.00705579,9.591724e-9,0.00003288907,0.98268926,0.00013403973,0.009751646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008510675,0.00007186128,0.0016458405,0.00072933483,0.00010435829,0.0000032169767,0.0003416283,0.0000030345414,0.000050204973,0.02781673,0.9682403,0.00014238147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016894592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008208119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9681063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010633765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023013705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003473356","doi":"10.4324/9780429288654-8","title":"From the doorstep to the database","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Database; Computer science","score_opus":0.03784562603916155,"score_gpt":0.27234723731494653,"score_spread":0.23450161127578498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003473356","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000051566876,0.00034251888,0.0025785333,0.014420287,0.0020485218,0.00056924555,0.00029555368,0.000057442714,0.97968274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006133462,0.0002820106,0.000103273596,0.0044850963,0.0046368805,0.0000049990576,0.00006301045,0.00002183341,0.98978955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986558,0.00005550861,0.00016284293,0.00031393877,0.00057209336,0.00023982841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838746,0.00049426244,0.000075974116,0.000880443,0.0000584649,0.0001033859],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005368751,0.0001689715,0.00018505297,0.000016592536,0.00059803826,0.0001724586,0.0012111329,0.00019131824,0.012171707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000421119,0.000070813134,0.00012908057,0.000028327238,0.0033922594,0.00009181726,0.00019069269,0.00024992847,0.0086531155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026115958,0.0000020326283,0.0000036909637,6.6457744e-7,0.000021587144,0.0000015334062,0.0033185256,1.9289114e-7,4.4795846e-7,0.73148084,0.26389042,0.0012774294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056945853,0.00000871018,0.000002812534,0.000026201586,0.00003630148,1.2871395e-7,0.0007907281,0.0000013988147,0.0000013595771,0.06289452,0.93602973,0.0001511884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009102024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03431951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6721393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048453854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021161437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011947477","doi":"","title":"The Dartmouth Schools Question and the Supreme Court ofNova Scotia","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legal history; Nova scotia; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.012767360362670406,"score_gpt":0.2688707710326621,"score_spread":0.2561034106699917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011947477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23808461,0.01596336,0.028782278,0.31010017,0.008957543,0.00212299,0.0000468475,0.0004821426,0.39546004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99214804,0.0014216577,0.00028817914,0.0007670669,0.0033980638,0.0000027533852,0.0000010454875,0.000012860617,0.0019603255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803424,0.0005315642,0.00028867542,0.00013652822,0.0005892132,0.00041980235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905914,0.00023486502,0.000163859,0.00019342214,0.00015783247,0.00019086243],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038073377,0.00011297108,0.00015267586,0.00001931054,0.0046574376,0.0009791354,0.00045168932,0.00008763351,0.00011519968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001754558,0.00005553725,0.00008850561,0.00011915954,0.009142821,0.00051172473,0.000046275058,0.0004905898,0.00008185668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047743084,0.00001672916,0.00065459026,0.0000010435797,0.000026119951,0.0000042347947,0.0051306775,0.000013421789,0.000012159571,0.98343384,0.004955993,0.005703423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016099806,0.000034385906,0.0005918101,0.000040035335,0.000059383987,0.00009801665,0.003610995,0.0001429868,0.000042613683,0.085976064,0.90762097,0.00017278014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016380196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03244675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90266496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007926808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013302063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99663836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013724371","doi":"","title":"Canada's Residential Schools and the Right to Integrity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012403787905154562,"score_gpt":0.26058822500860657,"score_spread":0.248184437103452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013724371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31806043,0.0011656391,0.0042763324,0.13132562,0.008585901,0.0024930781,0.00013895094,0.00037882154,0.53357524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97688794,0.000039804985,0.00031144317,0.004519748,0.003033345,0.000024263563,0.0000022193292,0.000012911991,0.015168319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978906,0.00038806707,0.00024287513,0.0003413139,0.0006376064,0.0004995684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864596,0.00018259199,0.00006885839,0.0003895986,0.00021196228,0.00050104473],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012701101,0.00014595327,0.00023022048,0.00002847076,0.0018844969,0.0004071473,0.0006066039,0.00012317735,0.0012227569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005630845,0.00009395503,0.00005940924,0.00026276344,0.008182128,0.00029172652,0.00012802388,0.00039461543,0.00030681587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055733264,0.0000085009315,0.0007004243,0.0000024820968,0.000017386094,0.0000081413,0.00095456257,1.6827417e-7,0.000023709148,0.88447046,0.11352965,0.00022879429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007117877,0.00003329091,0.0009029413,0.000025966634,0.000023170036,0.0000022889672,0.0006985547,0.000004693691,0.00045386085,0.056272738,0.94067246,0.0001982648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93177766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9936484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8281977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020092135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010779815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014351859","doi":"10.7202/1068483ar","title":"Moss v. Computers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Trumpeter","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Moss; Computer science; Botany; Biology","score_opus":0.037996160484163884,"score_gpt":0.2640871392305591,"score_spread":0.22609097874639522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014351859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24491116,0.00036116195,0.08721615,0.30792537,0.004120992,0.0009304366,0.000018566092,0.00091270497,0.35360345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901945,0.000019439272,0.00015667442,0.0065542785,0.0010456303,0.0000025520058,7.748636e-7,0.0000061515907,0.002020007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993631,0.00009508927,0.000072109855,0.00010285627,0.00017786138,0.00018894735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968684,0.00007431206,0.000022525277,0.0001090286,0.000013898395,0.00009341365],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016017545,0.000050509374,0.000072316434,0.0000056630392,0.0003307639,0.0000616873,0.0003457926,0.000031015094,0.00040086595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018268904,0.00002987196,0.000053816155,0.00009788596,0.0032229193,0.00008040163,0.000036799665,0.00007010788,0.00051092886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014497472,0.000012017461,0.00047509413,0.0000036348824,0.000022142744,0.000006859102,0.07404401,0.00000900401,0.00006052242,0.88609457,0.030583909,0.008673767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029954503,0.00004285809,0.00041089643,0.0000048468596,0.000014840449,6.7052645e-7,0.0014164046,0.0003589511,0.0001059593,0.015172291,0.9820304,0.0001423682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000098566605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053005166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9514465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012634495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002543569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023035481","doi":"10.12987/9780300227529","title":"The Soul of the First Amendment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Yale University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Amendment; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.023331041981705235,"score_gpt":0.20061066579902373,"score_spread":0.1772796238173185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023035481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010033054,0.00010974817,0.00013328686,0.0006093701,0.0005448623,0.0004166936,0.00006272117,0.000043696917,0.9980696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012997978,0.0002174993,0.000007935723,0.00008744419,0.0002868318,6.1994723e-7,0.000002573423,0.000010512223,0.9980868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880916,0.00012566775,0.000119816534,0.00021674609,0.0004966219,0.00023199861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990415,0.00017533069,0.00022685096,0.0003829664,0.00008353153,0.000089846944],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016594237,0.00013767663,0.00019355967,0.000018636598,0.0016058387,0.000048594888,0.0013890759,0.00020661154,0.000027317275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015471687,0.00009119362,0.00023159834,0.000018079823,0.010777535,0.000038422688,0.00037648776,0.00027572553,0.000008154066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001625646,0.0000061966143,0.0000054576494,0.00002037661,0.00006094414,0.0000066672487,0.006972925,0.0000013577854,7.3521454e-7,0.889652,0.10291401,0.00034306804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001790116,0.000016437967,0.0000023652526,0.000049881914,0.00009516486,1.4766164e-7,0.0008414094,0.0000028694412,0.00003469307,0.0030490002,0.99560744,0.00012156387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007377067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016736188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89269346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024442028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047848042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032934504","doi":"10.21991/cf29398","title":"Universities, the Charter, Doug Ford, and Campus Free Speech","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Free speech; Government (linguistics); Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.019671048416240216,"score_gpt":0.2430327299145546,"score_spread":0.2233616814983144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032934504","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010058096,0.0037312086,0.353664,0.30645788,0.005108201,0.0019163768,0.0011673673,0.00073275005,0.31716412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912965,0.00026911707,0.00068589963,0.0052515646,0.0007317079,0.000022594893,0.000058825924,0.000008999671,0.0016747707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764043,0.00012228952,0.00034543828,0.0004895578,0.0006411064,0.0007611778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847007,0.0002377692,0.00014543474,0.00044635267,0.0002438872,0.0004564956],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037484002,0.00027373654,0.00029026854,0.00008524668,0.004469809,0.00023046182,0.0009816285,0.00021680348,0.00045449988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038772332,0.00021828257,0.00017302875,0.00041391279,0.075929455,0.00089356396,0.00040949736,0.0003204819,0.00016344861],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004275811,0.000030875217,0.0027205567,0.000011309595,0.000062661944,0.00004316079,0.0014066821,0.00003191564,0.000024113047,0.9568542,0.038119685,0.0006520285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015223442,0.000055332137,0.00005759777,0.000039654013,0.00007112556,0.000085403066,0.021159971,0.00025156813,0.000047727994,0.09260094,0.88372356,0.00038477223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004303839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009086845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024487358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023905137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99682623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033284431","doi":"10.21991/cf29394","title":"Introduction: Symbolic Politics, Constitutional Consequences*","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Democracy; Sociology; Diversity (politics); De facto; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.028190580018755452,"score_gpt":0.26772541568922875,"score_spread":0.2395348356704733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033284431","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00062003365,0.0018340496,0.549765,0.2359812,0.0071397824,0.001156857,0.0007510343,0.0009398836,0.20181215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98006487,0.00031970342,0.0015164276,0.009233178,0.006598552,0.00009635757,0.00026150641,0.000016657643,0.0018927722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946345,0.00027827654,0.0010069843,0.0011217105,0.0013674177,0.0015910967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967267,0.0002763169,0.00031824654,0.0004555645,0.00093979354,0.0012833583],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060516363,0.00055448496,0.00065778976,0.00025328732,0.0056608142,0.00036120543,0.0008578396,0.00047086072,0.0041255746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018134869,0.0005672717,0.00042847937,0.000966588,0.3015086,0.0015199835,0.00020041878,0.0006288761,0.0022581494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050564802,0.00011978061,0.003707753,0.000022876804,0.00012863106,0.00007239462,0.0005690213,0.0003965068,0.00019956472,0.9268288,0.06763697,0.00026715887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013648712,0.00007172181,0.000025184449,0.00006423695,0.000093594375,0.00024148998,0.003680562,0.00015261307,0.00029765768,0.11197836,0.8812784,0.0007513385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017722126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010635106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9794448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006403096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008339089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033467396","doi":"10.21991/cf29397","title":"The Politics of Campus Free Speech in Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Politics; Executive order; Order (exchange); Liberal arts education; Political science; Higher education; Public administration; Directive; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.013957357414486496,"score_gpt":0.22911641902059113,"score_spread":0.21515906160610462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033467396","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2001229,0.009936154,0.11001439,0.5711628,0.006808818,0.0042432644,0.0027673915,0.00026019046,0.09468405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99588174,0.000624987,0.00010479251,0.0029969,0.00013886741,0.000020842623,0.000044046556,0.000004440109,0.00018340047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978584,0.0001998148,0.0004956384,0.00024123075,0.0005934323,0.0006114564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980191,0.0010435911,0.00017078476,0.00025113564,0.00027778512,0.00023762336],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055329327,0.00017139723,0.00026920016,0.00006256923,0.002400557,0.00008615841,0.00060147134,0.00008744336,0.000043428372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014083999,0.000107602486,0.00007877106,0.0005488681,0.08430067,0.00020379064,0.00017249714,0.0002499774,0.000005795954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056399673,0.000012713364,0.018828528,0.000008280284,0.000037356604,0.000014659192,0.0008049266,0.0005187013,0.0000021383805,0.9731854,0.0063477163,0.00018318222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037242598,0.00002871211,0.00033246411,0.000066065695,0.000053052347,0.000035142657,0.03121302,0.0029016389,0.00007017764,0.34678972,0.6144493,0.00033639622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69389266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8806365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79575884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035260737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00714824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033585614","doi":"10.21991/cf29395","title":"Compelling Freedom on Campus: A Free Speech Paradox","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Charter; Political science; Entitlement (fair division); Coercion (linguistics); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03216580779953247,"score_gpt":0.26786256532552793,"score_spread":0.23569675752599545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033585614","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026988944,0.0010551177,0.62069976,0.059895076,0.005348041,0.001418179,0.00076087425,0.00093356875,0.30719048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879135,0.00017709739,0.0029304505,0.0065902,0.0016074117,0.000035151825,0.00012399319,0.000020285195,0.0006019342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956628,0.00018692628,0.00073738117,0.0008821668,0.0012757624,0.0012549729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748343,0.0004203301,0.00026598666,0.0005660158,0.0003908013,0.00087344716],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005300136,0.00047246215,0.00056047994,0.00019062049,0.003807941,0.00028555977,0.0011765787,0.00039726813,0.001023749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013079697,0.0004541794,0.0004006808,0.0007319641,0.06685951,0.00082070695,0.00022840414,0.0005808736,0.0016295728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108852626,0.00014773292,0.0035123432,0.000015640395,0.000087235705,0.00010585624,0.0008476059,0.0016368711,0.00006553265,0.9585981,0.034192603,0.0006816521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028240362,0.00017683291,0.000033752614,0.0001745101,0.0000870843,0.00006585904,0.0058612567,0.0017043392,0.00023670252,0.13333115,0.85457397,0.0009305091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027815474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005145117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9852146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003626934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023567178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033795301","doi":"10.21991/cf29399","title":"Academic Freedom, Canadian Labour Law and the Scope of Intra-Mural Expression","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Mural; Collective bargaining; Scope (computer science); Academic freedom; Law; Freedom of association; Labour law; Censorship; Unit (ring theory); Sociology; Political science; Human rights; Higher education; History; Psychology; Computer science; Art history","score_opus":0.020545777426242893,"score_gpt":0.2553524037316265,"score_spread":0.2348066263053836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033795301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0101697715,0.014418314,0.14805168,0.19854875,0.006007555,0.0033313537,0.0017015758,0.000422153,0.61734885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991371,0.0006444942,0.00040376524,0.0068040765,0.0005125226,0.000037428443,0.000034758854,0.0000078058765,0.00018418259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975274,0.00020480993,0.00053821894,0.00040545542,0.00057659915,0.0007474831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832445,0.0002628587,0.00019552385,0.00021684989,0.00029079246,0.00070951524],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006472144,0.00024358206,0.0003898369,0.00009821703,0.0030604117,0.00010539839,0.00058897806,0.00031938238,0.0003709945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006751911,0.00017995019,0.00015691564,0.00039787593,0.12852128,0.0007631115,0.00014329416,0.00046789754,0.000075396165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009983247,0.0000134063275,0.001981953,0.000016948083,0.000035113477,0.000009219687,0.0009416554,0.00012878752,0.00025937808,0.99088925,0.0053757103,0.0002487589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004147309,0.000053778884,0.000099697696,0.0002296826,0.00008107575,0.00004773596,0.004824865,0.00029617347,0.0009800715,0.15982535,0.82887506,0.00053921493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02836599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0341718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016338058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030415896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044246106","doi":"","title":"‘The Highest Form of Patriotism:’ Toward an Understanding of First Amendment Precedents and NFL Protests","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Emerging Sport Studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patriotism; Law; First amendment; Political science; Amendment; Politics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.11035824080094257,"score_gpt":0.372857554571425,"score_spread":0.2624993137704824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044246106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99120474,0.0023992555,0.00082056853,0.0028093606,0.0014101508,0.00028730862,0.0000028117915,0.000010501208,0.0010553243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99418175,0.0048895217,0.0002442584,0.000009144224,0.00046238146,0.0000019467107,1.4780387e-7,0.0000067834285,0.00020406647],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985271,0.000027650784,0.0005609881,0.00010003025,0.00055555336,0.00022867601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853265,0.00008810618,0.0008121031,0.00009514695,0.00038938443,0.00008262858],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013101965,0.00009866658,0.00034198532,0.00007886913,0.0009021161,0.000027105581,0.00021130407,0.000039149225,0.000011124029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000111374226,0.000061509476,0.00007968569,0.00015598745,0.0046452065,0.00030549732,0.00006171248,0.00008405367,2.596366e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024839377,0.00026590156,0.5244865,0.00022108757,0.0008855423,0.000020189456,0.31487638,0.0000066241323,0.00014961007,0.15353964,0.002713488,0.0025866185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043664402,0.005921284,0.057733156,0.002685723,0.00088703487,0.000043463802,0.5870802,0.000045534725,0.0036026514,0.21067257,0.1260094,0.0009525485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015940775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019829858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46675336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015945736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066775596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99806356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082844825","doi":"","title":"From Seriatim to Dissent: an Historical Overview of Opinion-Delivery Practices in the United States and Canada Supreme Courts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Political science; Supreme court; Law; Dissenting opinion; Majority opinion; Politics","score_opus":0.04187982788270542,"score_gpt":0.2667447978361378,"score_spread":0.2248649699534324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082844825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45940536,0.004281491,0.00056898774,0.023880199,0.004581809,0.0029820474,0.004776313,0.00016862861,0.49935517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2303303,0.04634732,0.0011639128,0.0037188607,0.0031973564,0.000040375726,0.004176948,0.00021581553,0.7108091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698174,0.00040150032,0.00044149737,0.00072468043,0.00094023516,0.00051035045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975114,0.0008194656,0.0005833816,0.00049423566,0.000319021,0.00027250827],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049429765,0.0004199825,0.0006497093,0.0002969636,0.00067205844,0.00007215232,0.0009980167,0.0002134912,0.00040305028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066066306,0.00035083268,0.000099242076,0.0001500662,0.0027045486,0.0003223044,0.00040173237,0.0003231708,0.000018975854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003118268,0.00020141536,0.0028808373,0.0001231377,0.00036800516,0.0003164546,0.033869136,0.000049478705,0.000014631596,0.9052616,0.056409873,0.00019362652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004396076,0.00019716242,0.0026529417,0.00023266804,0.00019475279,0.0000064293154,0.006234647,0.000034218756,0.000002645654,0.010179048,0.97928673,0.0005391399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49819034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6878041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9228769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008453275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007447156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W30897024","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1429","title":"Racial and Ethnic Profiling: Statutory Discretion, Constitutional Remedies, and Democratic Accountability","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Statutory law; Legislature; Racial profiling; Statute; Democracy; Law; Political science; Accountability; Legislative history; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03839599351974181,"score_gpt":0.31375907818015114,"score_spread":0.2753630846604093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W30897024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075931355,0.009503075,0.106598035,0.0022423088,0.0037882735,0.0010160828,0.00006450057,0.00015661836,0.8006998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962023,0.0009100168,0.0016744959,0.00017105807,0.00046025508,0.0000054591655,0.000003546211,0.000006674641,0.0005662314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981473,0.0004303604,0.00031908063,0.00023404058,0.0005005122,0.00036867542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906456,0.000166213,0.00014232402,0.00010230637,0.000200202,0.0003244127],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020126805,0.00013427576,0.00020051429,0.00003433836,0.0022955353,0.00020972505,0.0001163509,0.00014328177,0.00027618487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026932964,0.0001090765,0.000051502026,0.000099583114,0.021117503,0.00060906407,0.000018567722,0.00037165254,0.0000052026844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018717967,0.000042755237,0.003850536,0.000011581652,0.000020881815,0.000009872653,0.0021402824,0.0000013851178,0.00008174134,0.99279976,0.00012990044,0.00089255837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001144474,0.000091611924,0.00083287706,0.0000516977,0.000071166505,0.00019021967,0.0034283877,0.00003767939,0.0001435819,0.95214367,0.04153173,0.0003329101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009539123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032787506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9202709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012909637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005225383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097669810","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3314993","title":"The Fraud Test and 'Manifest Injustice' under the New Act","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Test (biology); Psychology; Criminology; Law; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.010126175310304089,"score_gpt":0.2713020794227313,"score_spread":0.26117590411242725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097669810","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28044,0.04778316,0.13713573,0.30207917,0.008844095,0.001580838,0.000007679262,0.00036530918,0.221764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96499723,0.009285492,0.000013317073,0.0004422775,0.004920666,0.0000012024323,1.8856662e-7,0.000011709799,0.020327926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975527,0.00015650985,0.00016229664,0.00013045773,0.00035926615,0.0016388035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998991,0.0005000304,0.00011614452,0.00016152447,0.00009170639,0.00013957052],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026068906,0.00010162895,0.000089184214,0.000022202434,0.003981747,0.0004022038,0.00053636834,0.000077739474,0.00008243321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022315329,0.00004954369,0.00005544285,0.00017453304,0.006034268,0.00021344011,0.00004012328,0.00097297813,0.00007484609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000098918845,0.00001294433,0.0005756936,3.6244325e-7,0.000038287446,6.5327544e-7,0.0025019597,3.2869832e-7,0.000021846843,0.9814293,0.002782156,0.012626572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026400798,0.00023046568,0.0006254793,0.000006286828,0.000047174868,0.00007748148,0.016623428,0.000011865649,0.000012392782,0.75767934,0.22431867,0.000103432736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067199586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04769204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6845572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003254073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032568073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99731493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121156435","doi":"","title":"Using the Charter to Stop Racial Profiling: The Development of an Equality-Based Conception of Arbitrary Detention","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racial profiling; Charter; Offensive; Criminology; Political science; Rationality; Profiling (computer programming); Reasonable suspicion; Law; Sociology; Race (biology); Gender studies; Engineering; Operations research; Computer science","score_opus":0.1401032799816692,"score_gpt":0.3488697523661616,"score_spread":0.2087664723844924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121156435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6897985,0.00021817801,0.23200555,0.0019164988,0.0012474055,0.00088043965,0.0000136051485,0.000040276558,0.07387956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99058336,0.0000050930726,0.008596103,0.00020899148,0.0005176063,0.0000039753772,0.0000018328021,0.000007500524,0.00007551167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981403,0.000493026,0.00043543574,0.000113534305,0.0005848533,0.00023286245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919856,0.000059681348,0.00030947928,0.0001407387,0.0001883617,0.00010319211],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018813618,0.00008636329,0.00014513182,0.000033520068,0.0013419093,0.000079807025,0.00032184934,0.0000716862,0.00022848918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027740434,0.000050093266,0.00009501658,0.00013930925,0.0017767162,0.00026062326,0.000017418168,0.00018051513,0.0000053829112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005090351,0.0001966173,0.00039326117,0.000013439239,0.000036943355,0.000001968686,0.045776073,0.00017689813,0.009460346,0.93626195,0.00002012206,0.007611502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011819496,0.002165805,0.005195074,0.0013965156,0.00091793056,0.00011294457,0.122054376,0.030108608,0.32045487,0.412552,0.09007695,0.0031454347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006723417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010670983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52370995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007397727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013287358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121409700","doi":"","title":"Sunshine's chill: Overbroad American Open Meetings Laws and the Limits of Disclosure","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Transparency (behavior); Discretion; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public access; Freedom of information; Law; Public administration; Business","score_opus":0.021720922949092426,"score_gpt":0.30456163087323856,"score_spread":0.2828407079241461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121409700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16276681,0.00042962344,0.0010524102,0.066773735,0.00022669832,0.0008695222,0.00002579924,0.000080754784,0.76777464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97617924,0.00050316425,0.00015225145,0.00042706815,0.0001371019,0.0000119019105,3.3223972e-7,0.000006455004,0.02258249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990421,0.00019487484,0.0001507169,0.0001691405,0.00024373058,0.00019947189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991424,0.00041933806,0.000121831334,0.00018468189,0.00004984659,0.00008187918],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008643041,0.00008069494,0.0002638064,0.000013041727,0.00031614222,0.00009314512,0.0005321943,0.00003326938,0.00037947876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018303857,0.000029462311,0.00007516109,0.00014217115,0.017453432,0.00024931354,0.00012687223,0.000036554466,0.000008428714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003250536,0.000022510987,0.0047146883,0.000001692903,0.000064051994,3.233556e-7,0.004182384,4.0254772e-8,0.000049562066,0.9826719,0.0029825044,0.005277821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005143919,0.00022321311,0.012170292,0.0000618785,0.0003744484,0.0000019584747,0.0072285025,0.0000063262223,0.0010724838,0.1481397,0.82505846,0.0005188204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018402662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018276962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8345322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012169574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004428324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122095553","doi":"","title":"The Legislature, The Executive and The Courts:The Delicate Balance of Power or Who is RunningThis Country Anyway?","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Balance (ability); Executive power; Power (physics); Law; Separation of powers; Political science; Legislation; Law and economics; Economics; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.012996224039834196,"score_gpt":0.26635117729895375,"score_spread":0.25335495325911955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122095553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064012535,0.033900436,0.00340708,0.19756354,0.0050672526,0.0022420879,0.00018229378,0.00014648148,0.6934783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95559657,0.019432068,0.00004398007,0.008688017,0.0015113452,0.000014570136,0.0000010247325,0.000028380608,0.01468404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976202,0.00050121365,0.00037289644,0.00017519105,0.0008122424,0.00051820726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976928,0.0010845405,0.00041455842,0.00040126455,0.0002922372,0.00011457174],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002686978,0.00016909679,0.00025402918,0.000015038613,0.00610991,0.00058218365,0.0011103237,0.00012390202,0.0001556309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017565012,0.000055784516,0.00013264448,0.00028510377,0.021805288,0.00027166252,0.00009435866,0.0006884707,0.000008243283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030361695,0.000025283536,0.00075686787,0.0000017727868,0.000116981966,0.000021415177,0.037108634,0.000003270237,0.000010461753,0.88968676,0.07115628,0.00080864964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008091525,0.000042154308,0.00041038988,0.00003108512,0.00006163192,0.0001740033,0.007324319,0.00005927688,0.000017923952,0.041131895,0.94982326,0.00011492524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015170536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004755495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89158404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004258217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017581414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122291537","doi":"","title":"The Rule of Law Through the Looking Glass","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Law; Sociology; Citizenship; Politics; Adventure; Law and literature; Public law; Democracy; Political science; History","score_opus":0.01098454778374097,"score_gpt":0.27513181154594085,"score_spread":0.2641472637621999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122291537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060827963,0.041916195,0.06648089,0.11300738,0.0028112642,0.00076170644,0.0000038110634,0.00015078037,0.71404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98744833,0.0065492364,0.000020455056,0.00044092585,0.00091163506,9.518039e-7,1.9691436e-7,0.0000058401124,0.0046224114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975479,0.00020079018,0.00021487972,0.00009030453,0.00045372243,0.0014923972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938476,0.00015479406,0.00017050495,0.00016172626,0.00008899256,0.00003922865],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026286389,0.00007887348,0.00010965512,0.00001054375,0.0023757764,0.000129095,0.0006578226,0.000060056787,0.00002137748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005500622,0.000038581053,0.00012751443,0.00014177903,0.0035911293,0.0002362414,0.000014751166,0.0008600731,0.000011743866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010389416,0.000018201577,0.000028140414,3.274838e-7,0.000032187596,6.0871577e-7,0.005286861,0.0000046846935,0.00003826597,0.9853488,0.00012656196,0.009104961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015851429,0.00008312381,0.00002370611,0.0000072805374,0.000016354743,0.000018197154,0.005369779,0.0000041589633,0.00007289536,0.80755013,0.18664248,0.000053395128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056447845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060945284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92662036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032683375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001123482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122428691","doi":"","title":"Ministerial Misfeasance: R. v. Morris and a UniqueEarly Privacy Breach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer security; Law; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0197245418296705,"score_gpt":0.28760336063646547,"score_spread":0.267878818806795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122428691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6223229,0.0018294159,0.010125708,0.01808569,0.0035828382,0.00065099547,0.000038300266,0.00034156413,0.34302256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917874,0.00048373558,0.0013784899,0.0012043434,0.002876164,0.0000016955552,0.000002443877,0.000014108955,0.0022516197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831057,0.00021761401,0.0002911947,0.00020902525,0.00048116094,0.0004904569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911803,0.000050955176,0.00014882897,0.00017318457,0.00011476899,0.00039425577],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074869255,0.00014652625,0.00023153464,0.00004674112,0.0016759865,0.00060607295,0.00036951984,0.00015449857,0.0002762517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052160358,0.0001220994,0.00009186888,0.00014044314,0.0036099884,0.0005381908,0.000031543183,0.0003029419,0.000019649468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010479903,0.0001417726,0.0006624513,0.000005255106,0.000028948729,0.0001935466,0.026499229,8.901156e-7,0.0006054453,0.938946,0.008507009,0.024304666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001367155,0.00029638733,0.0017609849,0.00004675131,0.000042682655,0.0003079569,0.0010142958,0.0000106999305,0.00014423844,0.08556186,0.90910625,0.0003407356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005922721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061526085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90059924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016121929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123858016","doi":"","title":"Don’t Be So Hateful — The Insufficiency of Anti-Discrimination and Hate Crime Laws in Improving Trans Wellbeing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hate crime; Harassment; Emancipation; Law; Identity (music); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.025497917614821484,"score_gpt":0.25348227474928625,"score_spread":0.22798435713446477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123858016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7091335,0.00000826647,0.002756352,0.0012235303,0.00026673137,0.0006215247,0.000016367918,0.000059574435,0.28591412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824069,0.017263332,0.00012665337,0.00003236825,0.00006184377,9.4043384e-7,0.0000022433344,0.000009697415,0.0000960325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987278,0.00018935732,0.00016171522,0.0003019683,0.00027367647,0.0003454977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921393,0.000088818866,0.00021217816,0.00033546262,0.00009268367,0.000056945697],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006105206,0.00013473407,0.00020969576,0.0016547312,0.0017343059,0.00021152713,0.0007025593,0.00011804685,0.000012869251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010940841,0.00011141451,0.00007521686,0.0010971338,0.0049942834,0.0010366926,0.00012902965,0.00016482676,9.4129166e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008655935,0.00065142574,0.011381371,0.00015148532,0.000046980007,0.000097993,0.34396875,0.000016882606,0.0005991355,0.5956933,0.00003046362,0.04727566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016853313,0.00020364716,0.010596771,0.00011480612,0.00012910514,0.0000020658729,0.025947312,0.0007239547,0.001264627,0.00008441268,0.9588279,0.0004200469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22267188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13761397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95879745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000114606744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038705298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124110914","doi":"","title":"Customs Censorship and the Charter: The Little Sisters Case","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Charter; Law; Censorship; Politics; Political science; Legislation; Disadvantaged; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.01634789613095618,"score_gpt":0.24433255981187418,"score_spread":0.227984663680918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124110914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88762707,0.018671,0.0048699277,0.054709405,0.0013421428,0.00068721373,0.0000044257927,0.00009934017,0.031989492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773652,0.0117963115,0.000004195421,0.00038903308,0.0010335871,0.000004604969,2.5432206e-7,0.000009722057,0.009397083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974456,0.000515942,0.00017216282,0.00012677559,0.00031643308,0.001423132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993305,0.00025293062,0.00010466994,0.0001560615,0.000054848173,0.000100967365],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034128334,0.00010019856,0.0001341045,0.000028535147,0.003161426,0.00011248731,0.0003216788,0.00006471771,0.000047106063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009246478,0.000047939335,0.00011674737,0.00014554683,0.0091154305,0.00017397485,0.00001782603,0.0010163906,0.000028740973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004150631,0.00001405704,0.0003126516,8.091612e-7,0.000053472068,0.0000726875,0.018718075,0.0000010247232,0.0000031931204,0.97678864,0.00043138754,0.00356249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003571119,0.00021900836,0.00017005648,0.000016136468,0.00014796559,0.028407104,0.074861564,0.00006605919,0.000020981084,0.6461566,0.24596539,0.00039802925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000645415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055976342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33063206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025584715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082855794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99813634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124261222","doi":"","title":"Hierarchies of Harm in Canadian Criminal Law: The Marijuana Trilogy and the Forcible “Correction” of Children","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Law; Supreme court; Criminal law; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Criminology; Criminal Conviction; Possession (linguistics); Sociology; Conviction","score_opus":0.012247982616279495,"score_gpt":0.2490488176209205,"score_spread":0.236800835004641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124261222","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7955308,0.0018032364,0.00019564432,0.007898959,0.0012083453,0.0010613316,0.000050338134,0.000035754612,0.1922156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977772,0.0002047598,0.00006430006,0.0005145688,0.00021422157,0.000015817688,0.0000033619156,0.0000075772514,0.0011981861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878776,0.0002151005,0.00024899846,0.00016371005,0.00022836457,0.0003560706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992841,0.00018748739,0.000093031624,0.0002213192,0.0000563258,0.00015773314],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077118806,0.00009474199,0.00022252812,0.000070014474,0.0006247825,0.000053320975,0.0003526768,0.000086095846,0.0001175911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011864958,0.00005734351,0.00007386099,0.0002654486,0.01060651,0.00017868787,0.000034213987,0.0002085037,0.0000072137373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045867127,0.0000175945,0.0040038726,0.000005371609,0.000019390212,0.0000012707131,0.0070665604,0.00005551951,0.000008689412,0.98801315,0.00027290653,0.0004898238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0093336785,0.00036738426,0.05869917,0.00018927408,0.00025434128,0.000029509582,0.015180661,0.00008707593,0.0023668595,0.7538864,0.15890408,0.0007015566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.952424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97667885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23412672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012468112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005064122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99208605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124655312","doi":"","title":"'Dignitizing' Free Speech in Israel: The Impact of the Constitutional Revolution on Free Speech Protection","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Free speech; Law; Political science; Bill of rights; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Human rights; Constitution","score_opus":0.02270652773365419,"score_gpt":0.2869620760378275,"score_spread":0.2642555483041733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124655312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93365705,0.0030518377,0.014687172,0.0070082913,0.002056263,0.0015400264,0.00003297903,0.00006299371,0.037903376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708277,0.0005742391,0.000029224117,0.00004254022,0.0014768778,0.000008537189,9.335541e-7,0.000008678961,0.0007762183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679357,0.000510748,0.0003052479,0.0001291141,0.00068477175,0.0015765377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907917,0.000099495446,0.000271484,0.00031930036,0.00014996632,0.00008058017],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004716997,0.0001355221,0.00015741285,0.00009923897,0.0009904315,0.00005017273,0.00073134707,0.00014215367,0.00006969851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007169019,0.000072674135,0.00024129821,0.00046000833,0.0044447486,0.00039795987,0.00005434239,0.0015615455,0.000019399939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054247244,0.00012639139,0.009976922,0.0000018142048,0.000051109095,6.692495e-7,0.00083602883,0.000029093291,0.0002733652,0.98482,0.0005699354,0.0032604034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011485408,0.0003077692,0.009094882,0.00007410518,0.000037849717,0.00028996007,0.004134522,0.00003456814,0.0004446378,0.9815174,0.0027216591,0.00019410472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00548505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01234998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06342569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027488745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003326654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131615048","doi":"","title":"A Response to Fake News as a Response to Citizens United","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Argument (complex analysis); Incitement; Politics; Absolute (philosophy); Intervention (counseling); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Linguistics; Psychology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.010844965270522824,"score_gpt":0.28362319784018025,"score_spread":0.27277823256965744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131615048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9537412,0.00018368976,0.004852473,0.034192573,0.00060532836,0.00052783836,0.0000057147176,0.0000921158,0.0057990523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8681566,0.00028956417,0.00011242953,0.003128887,0.0004961653,0.000010426605,0.0000013790456,0.00003365628,0.12777087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99361104,0.0017228485,0.00035048847,0.0003477286,0.0007914426,0.0031764363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812734,0.0005280815,0.00012048124,0.00035387033,0.00024117794,0.0006290502],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009276015,0.00020149961,0.0002759586,0.00057312497,0.0007674318,0.00023487696,0.0007367114,0.00016625447,0.00054951425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014965653,0.0001738656,0.0001705033,0.0013308867,0.0006346836,0.00021827285,0.00006910234,0.0011434876,0.002452826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016949473,0.000086501605,0.00073623675,0.0000017115643,0.000110965375,0.000044880926,0.021990709,0.000052166335,0.009294049,0.9420739,0.004183645,0.0044757826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013630589,0.0019550647,0.0003830285,0.00003821342,0.000024219979,0.00014219368,0.02129866,0.0000056679473,0.000104585575,0.13477084,0.8395242,0.0003902472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008513407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007801326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83534056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020117366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071548806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99847364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134211377","doi":"","title":"Racial Justice and Peace","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Desegregation; Doctrine; Legal doctrine; Sociology","score_opus":0.011009413929172623,"score_gpt":0.2768292501082882,"score_spread":0.26581983617911553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134211377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42544296,0.1326796,0.20931466,0.031627208,0.0066419295,0.00042235793,0.000008309042,0.00026337325,0.1935996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9247977,0.044310775,0.00010981991,0.00022403039,0.0025791621,0.0000010532588,0.0000011074487,0.000010758672,0.027965574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977935,0.00018498708,0.00013193076,0.00014221683,0.00029667158,0.0014507263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954665,0.000066577566,0.00006355877,0.00007350962,0.00011852451,0.00013119163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014475466,0.000072961884,0.00011172213,0.000029346937,0.0010629104,0.0001447651,0.0001480724,0.00007707718,0.00014310158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019029685,0.000064485226,0.000058053527,0.00015937442,0.001486051,0.00022875195,0.000024499357,0.00082528486,0.000028219103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008842847,0.000022283908,0.00020587866,0.0000027277968,0.000029818808,0.000016345162,0.003698496,7.880213e-7,0.0000786417,0.9836236,0.0004897554,0.011822793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007271231,0.000116553594,0.00008594593,0.00001223314,0.00017415894,0.00034737185,0.032333367,0.000017660961,0.000068487796,0.6340164,0.33188063,0.00022007967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007408377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061656577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49935475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036053962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036365262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81751555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134258955","doi":"","title":"Compelling Freedom on Campus: A Free Speech Paradox","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Charter; Autonomy; Ideology; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Academic freedom; Democracy; Coercion (linguistics); Corporate governance; Statement (logic); Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.018253414537804012,"score_gpt":0.25828077921168174,"score_spread":0.24002736467387772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134258955","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25755802,0.015167209,0.45622548,0.11380564,0.00567232,0.001574465,0.000040519077,0.0009697834,0.14898658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98760396,0.004481352,0.00031867382,0.0009833502,0.0045339824,0.0000015095269,0.0000023402933,0.000030023984,0.0020448174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959459,0.00024035333,0.0003160104,0.00028607337,0.00074479287,0.0024669054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990269,0.00013111765,0.00018422292,0.00021072195,0.0000946512,0.00035237576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016738612,0.00018223617,0.00026755355,0.00006536392,0.0010176393,0.00018042124,0.0009482009,0.00014364322,0.00022605098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025299366,0.00015256678,0.00019513092,0.00033541518,0.0019290239,0.00024089603,0.00004304066,0.00199137,0.00028878055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005534897,0.00005050886,0.00039861034,0.0000024478034,0.000077165736,0.0000229187,0.004987966,0.00008261607,0.000049171285,0.9864097,0.0020343817,0.0058291596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014907095,0.00067751395,0.000019445912,0.00003054133,0.000054213368,0.000066447385,0.013785512,0.00033812458,0.0000860908,0.86240166,0.12065341,0.00039630473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033710923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036731218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.730046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000690379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021297943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86516225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157406129","doi":"","title":"The Fourth Amendment Limits of Facial Recognition at the Border","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Law; First amendment; Political science","score_opus":0.03107473343573984,"score_gpt":0.29027726317913116,"score_spread":0.2592025297433913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157406129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46499357,0.0044391924,0.0014092607,0.032281853,0.005322828,0.0012085978,0.00017680062,0.00019055526,0.48997736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93984807,0.0017581703,0.00021154994,0.0013287916,0.0013489446,0.00005628408,0.000033675118,0.000019505615,0.055395026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983506,0.00033868922,0.00023203946,0.00021160477,0.00053029694,0.00033674942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989816,0.0002834194,0.000116428266,0.0002983332,0.0002040506,0.00011618264],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068903924,0.00009962924,0.00013450392,0.000009719932,0.0017325013,0.00014793576,0.00029327752,0.000090818685,0.0018190942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021610646,0.000058704765,0.00012264903,0.00020865856,0.0037055034,0.00016051206,0.000072788804,0.00015757374,0.0003556541],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054718803,0.00012442992,0.0009566813,0.000011253148,0.00009127089,0.000014136859,0.005715901,0.000009262252,0.001072308,0.9389107,0.01693371,0.036105618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034413754,0.00003274697,0.00018485854,0.000019161525,0.000030673753,0.0000015725362,0.0025306514,0.0000038497656,0.005108597,0.029668987,0.96194834,0.00012640399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010617067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043315344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94501466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010329109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018661717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159757507","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v20i2.5133","title":"Ronin: A Police Officer's Fall into the Federal Correctional System","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Political science; Law; Criminology; Public administration; Psychology","score_opus":0.031027629140168732,"score_gpt":0.27671225062042515,"score_spread":0.2456846214802564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159757507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50643986,0.0012057899,0.08838458,0.011113928,0.018186744,0.0010663609,0.000013032571,0.00029507943,0.37329462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993264,0.00006920645,0.001298535,0.00034198601,0.001500546,0.0000055347837,4.499551e-7,0.000018593677,0.0035011137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976531,0.00042099878,0.0005131132,0.0001664662,0.0008546708,0.00039163482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983677,0.00022971796,0.0006168973,0.00020944513,0.00030280722,0.00027341052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015268432,0.00016058449,0.0002927466,0.00014651805,0.0012337466,0.00014023215,0.00070362707,0.0001354233,0.00013077245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110114044,0.00010105326,0.0002730124,0.00028569074,0.0024336649,0.0003286954,0.000043377637,0.00052354735,0.00009014545],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003535362,0.00042422072,0.0071757315,0.00001620683,0.00026772474,0.000036010253,0.22622868,0.00006757128,0.000045078654,0.708093,0.05113506,0.00615717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046965056,0.0020183057,0.008296713,0.0004458868,0.00039271938,0.00036809416,0.33660567,0.00048981514,0.00048118157,0.0064263535,0.638681,0.0010977943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068977815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049731485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70166665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046950416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056228705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163023040","doi":"10.29173/mlj817","title":"Social Incrimination: How North American Courts are Embracing Social Network Evidence in Criminal and Civil Trials","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Self-incrimination; Political science; Law; Criminology; Criminal trial; Sociology; Privilege (computing)","score_opus":0.14480596891845848,"score_gpt":0.34825251287941794,"score_spread":0.20344654396095946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163023040","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851013,0.00087522244,0.001640036,0.0069183707,0.0016455319,0.00031043924,0.0000058241276,0.000052709318,0.0034506028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794638,0.00025103876,0.00017390968,0.0004152187,0.019624645,0.000009384289,0.0000016546843,0.000018180219,0.00004216923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960161,0.0015956747,0.0004957469,0.00021004965,0.0008170944,0.0008653714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980969,0.0005681018,0.0007817166,0.00007463584,0.00020029377,0.00027838597],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053393473,0.00019966818,0.00058773224,0.00008915772,0.0038417436,0.0007091445,0.00030118416,0.00011552513,0.000052820888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000507432,0.00017690468,0.00015524773,0.00034128423,0.0048711654,0.0015141708,0.000073860196,0.0005072309,0.0000072242287],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027124435,0.00026037704,0.2768551,0.00007251295,0.000120623234,0.00013638375,0.09399031,0.000014689206,0.000016900305,0.5181829,0.014479642,0.09559931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022200807,0.00024129532,0.6330912,0.0003329045,0.00060520554,0.00015740283,0.27382842,0.000036786852,0.000020846848,0.03246598,0.055673327,0.0013265514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004145285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39586654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4857169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000344351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012561124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164543946","doi":"","title":"The Rhetoric of the Fourth Amendment: Toward a More Persuasive Fourth Amendment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Washington and Lee law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pathos; Law; Rhetoric; Ethos; Supreme court; Persuasion; Political science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Theology; Psychology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030643938652355575,"score_gpt":0.2938162550746398,"score_spread":0.2631723164222842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164543946","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02131744,0.4226434,0.0032052707,0.3501902,0.0056260917,0.007064355,0.000106624546,0.00029918042,0.18954745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6774714,0.31355608,0.000075390824,0.0029615092,0.00036620634,0.00006260597,0.0000010380368,0.000018483051,0.0054873154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808013,0.00037272664,0.00034248517,0.00025851995,0.00056539173,0.000380755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988601,0.00025790514,0.0002623484,0.00039028082,0.0000939621,0.00013540246],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011975565,0.00016567456,0.00033672308,0.000011674992,0.00092524535,0.000084221065,0.0005667213,0.000064520966,0.00014872698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001413635,0.00006564386,0.00021753271,0.00019403665,0.0049563115,0.00017713348,0.00011299806,0.00011981956,0.000020549704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050051985,0.000024707757,0.000086026914,0.000178271,0.000034450626,0.0000010699799,0.004187991,6.877217e-8,0.000038133683,0.96841687,0.0026170418,0.024410345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029764159,0.00004729486,0.000027392502,0.0014842084,0.00008821107,0.0000017936873,0.0006602204,0.0000010932944,0.00009528877,0.00597569,0.9911811,0.00014011642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033099702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000648818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109354594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000943513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99775165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165048554","doi":"10.2478/vjls-2021-0004","title":"The Rules Applicable to Conflicts of Interests for Canadian State Representatives","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vietnamese Journal of Legal Sciences","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Public Works and Government Services Canada","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Public administration; House of Representatives; Public interest; Law; Law and economics; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.05327709081726061,"score_gpt":0.35162122146138264,"score_spread":0.298344130644122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165048554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6472729,0.0028245354,0.025698675,0.24918579,0.0024031554,0.0020793283,0.00014961914,0.00004205821,0.070343964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965105,0.0001734662,0.001396143,0.0006812269,0.0003695656,0.0000060471702,1.9346277e-7,0.0000049827486,0.0008578962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982781,0.00014094923,0.00041051093,0.00016045535,0.00060137705,0.00040859758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998304,0.00032378384,0.00032561927,0.0000838634,0.00034166992,0.00062107836],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002057593,0.00008438047,0.00022657184,0.00008937291,0.0011529314,0.00029220094,0.0010085403,0.000031730502,0.00003900368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000887705,0.000048548016,0.000121780824,0.0005179366,0.006618255,0.00050704286,0.0000402249,0.00011104014,0.0000076260876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023112416,0.000052717274,0.0031737022,0.000026864476,0.00009549593,0.000025506273,0.16709982,0.00053598394,0.0018977452,0.77666956,0.02803508,0.022156382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003047515,0.00067119685,0.00036612607,0.000047717098,0.000015650114,0.000004364138,0.02591349,0.00018361508,0.00119651,0.015249599,0.9559077,0.00013930524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018002387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087749064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9278726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060874037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011137506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99608517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174749648","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3803443","title":"The Right to Vote and Freedom of Expression in Political Process Cases Under the Charter","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Freedom of expression; Politics; Political science; Process (computing); Political process; Law and economics; Law; Human rights; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.014152423779719606,"score_gpt":0.2821137082891486,"score_spread":0.267961284509429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174749648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81121224,0.0041111424,0.01670743,0.16259871,0.00037938077,0.0005775403,0.0000060532884,0.00003259238,0.004374919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998165,0.00045213045,0.00000767925,0.00047436365,0.0005784601,0.0000040712544,1.7291883e-7,0.0000065273316,0.00031158337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794614,0.0001945579,0.00019281563,0.0001207929,0.0003241204,0.0012215626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994154,0.0002194325,0.00006421237,0.00007769767,0.00006193426,0.00016135283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010780144,0.00007639097,0.00011605388,0.000023322695,0.00065120193,0.00007945282,0.00033240166,0.000052880237,0.000010683995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013726378,0.000036493682,0.000042400225,0.00017312588,0.0019174031,0.00013147575,0.00003023085,0.00061822025,0.0000027854353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041586893,0.000016561145,0.00062228244,0.0000023116563,0.0000124963,0.0000030891267,0.0044653052,0.0000062478834,0.00017258976,0.9939303,0.0001409063,0.00058635965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072260184,0.0004048127,0.00059207436,0.00004756949,0.000026951762,0.00008169288,0.05194388,0.00008281477,0.0008329706,0.9307384,0.014338055,0.00018816907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023367815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010499105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18695278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015114667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090346177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7064752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185707320","doi":"10.1515/icl-2021-0003","title":"Public Employees Restrictions on Political Activity in Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICL Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Impartiality; Government (linguistics); Human rights; Public service; Public administration; Neutrality; Democracy; Balance (ability); Political science; Law; Dignity","score_opus":0.14218280279160908,"score_gpt":0.33101466611121866,"score_spread":0.18883186331960958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185707320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96054757,0.000015126062,0.00017083423,0.035118546,0.00044336592,0.0000426287,0.0000047434078,0.000006209328,0.003651004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984538,0.00003442432,0.000014612735,0.0003374057,0.0004066615,0.0000013973978,5.479798e-7,0.0000031505917,0.0007480084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985459,0.0005149601,0.00012589878,0.00009198695,0.00035555125,0.0003657236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916357,0.00036924268,0.000045442346,0.00008416881,0.00009773303,0.00023983877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004637466,0.000055513665,0.0001022035,0.00007434962,0.0007388021,0.00024431324,0.00012983341,0.00004728632,0.00018757215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003761857,0.00003651953,0.000033569802,0.00040716384,0.0018692358,0.00015294542,0.0000195314,0.0003941678,0.000003234083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012196736,0.000034702403,0.038245548,6.481905e-7,0.000011966261,0.00008977854,0.00043835575,0.0000049538894,0.000007131658,0.95924115,0.0017027749,0.00021081777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046239775,0.00009534656,0.45737413,0.00008941609,0.00006612279,0.0003083893,0.009201569,0.00013461214,0.00023912662,0.18228187,0.34510982,0.00047561168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.886964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9606766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77695924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045789898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001468183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68872774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205336067","doi":"","title":"Disclosure, Not Disqualification: A Democratic Proposal to Promote the Fidelity of Elected Representatives to the People","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Democracy; Fidelity; Public administration; House of Representatives; Law; Engineering; Legislature","score_opus":0.04454734468370573,"score_gpt":0.3022225230379913,"score_spread":0.25767517835428555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205336067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6108765,0.000026542513,0.16886826,0.18137087,0.00010264297,0.0045127277,0.00065001246,0.00013152539,0.0334609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899318,0.00024748596,0.004265389,0.00013711069,0.000113060785,0.0000013361581,0.00003636202,0.000013807527,0.0052536214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953848,0.0017916205,0.00020993674,0.0005642859,0.0013842019,0.00066515926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971566,0.0007134649,0.00018430885,0.00063516386,0.00074707996,0.00056335924],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016713525,0.00016947041,0.00036027443,0.00023721973,0.0027480728,0.000056653167,0.0026306275,0.00008017039,0.00019533811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008123631,0.00013733159,0.00020969858,0.0027802968,0.007255064,0.0004628513,0.0010307087,0.0004981227,0.000020093614],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026940943,0.0003491138,0.010099521,0.00012793133,0.00026241236,0.000043237218,0.40365994,0.00016771539,0.0031766093,0.54930115,0.02402178,0.0060965153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00152489,0.0014754117,0.05357576,0.000098645345,0.00014139443,0.0000019957517,0.3141033,0.0018421543,0.0006299764,0.017452309,0.60861754,0.0005366048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037160853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020792075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58459574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015758217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087762316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99855024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216061859","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-88704-9","title":"Understanding Cybersecurity Law and Digital Privacy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Future of business and finance","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Computer security; Information privacy; Internet privacy; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0322307501218966,"score_gpt":0.2312088817748908,"score_spread":0.1989781316529942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216061859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055426586,0.025245048,0.0054847137,0.0017221854,0.0021902996,0.00032266788,0.00023305342,0.000046638634,0.96420115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32252192,0.07954919,0.000510066,0.00041861067,0.008980329,0.000011612628,0.0002468665,0.00008825238,0.5876731],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900186,0.000016003463,0.00019337148,0.00031992604,0.00025756433,0.00021126094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993836,0.000053335265,0.00019190488,0.0001741475,0.000149649,0.00004732516],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011682993,0.0001828083,0.00041885488,0.00003468815,0.00041823665,0.00018771844,0.00014843274,0.00036414736,0.00002636259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022260294,0.00016250386,0.000055519748,0.00013874681,0.0067206286,0.00035912855,0.00009437112,0.00017462888,0.0000010906115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007299093,0.000015619877,0.000037874343,0.00013516158,0.000014758352,0.000022106133,0.002848508,2.411615e-7,3.5448375e-7,0.9893294,0.0059593013,0.0016294031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001883477,0.000009465214,0.000103355145,0.00027812787,0.00002179931,0.000003539488,0.00049367937,0.0000011201236,7.296943e-7,0.1679424,0.83075494,0.00020247702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009659722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005133014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82479566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008178332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003372052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W324562210","doi":"","title":"Regulating Internet Pornography Aimed at Children: A Comparative Constitutional Perspective on Passing the Camel through the Needle's Eye","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Scrutiny; Pornography; Constitution; Child pornography; Constitutional court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Sociology; The Internet; Computer science","score_opus":0.026445520657002574,"score_gpt":0.30608061556982624,"score_spread":0.2796350949128237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W324562210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33780846,0.0013160041,0.012046109,0.008205333,0.0014417142,0.0013486508,0.000049666778,0.00025962922,0.6375244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937709,0.000014612337,0.00032309102,0.0019054294,0.0012669078,0.000018754883,0.000013110706,0.000011407914,0.0026758183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975064,0.000388477,0.00033738939,0.00041801293,0.0007534395,0.00059632346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844897,0.0005907649,0.00023706388,0.00035396605,0.00020828914,0.000160958],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011187216,0.00023919527,0.00026240552,0.00004666124,0.0032781076,0.00028756238,0.0005832169,0.00014099234,0.00030940992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012374879,0.00013922079,0.00023155699,0.0005088115,0.029374167,0.00039991812,0.00010591025,0.0005103283,0.00015157554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006709811,0.00005788313,0.006446643,0.0000010069501,0.00010641022,0.0000041256135,0.03720323,0.00005174173,0.00002611201,0.9520345,0.0039208164,0.00008044048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039852397,0.0004355627,0.06344932,0.00042066068,0.00028635105,0.00005203624,0.21564631,0.0001872791,0.0032286388,0.26593217,0.44457915,0.0017972798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008243699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013009571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68610233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048897613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001690137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W329182439","doi":"","title":"Absentee and Write-In Ballots: Constitutional and Policy Considerations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ballot; Voting; Political science; Spoilt vote; Straight-ticket voting; Public administration; Secret ballot; Democracy; First-past-the-post voting; Group voting ticket; Turnout; Law; Supreme court; Politics","score_opus":0.03619814241904476,"score_gpt":0.31189404000126525,"score_spread":0.27569589758222046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W329182439","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009352568,0.77839446,0.0001474236,0.10206557,0.0008336505,0.0019517493,0.00038235125,0.000048715312,0.10682351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8325314,0.14110883,0.00022465656,0.025061162,0.0005126903,0.00003497751,0.00002889246,0.000005856327,0.0004915346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911344,0.000112994756,0.0001778087,0.00012842765,0.00010628903,0.00036105575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915546,0.00007289123,0.000030160554,0.00008315546,0.000022779464,0.00063552946],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042080195,0.00008256068,0.0001713362,0.00008491069,0.00042217463,0.000045312103,0.00004827348,0.000042193984,0.0009848949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000107852815,0.000078158184,0.000023820628,0.00013575412,0.005672052,0.0003052757,0.000010698295,0.000068581045,0.0000366217],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.4683555e-7,0.000008471803,0.030102022,0.000065931534,0.00000828996,0.00000773364,0.0005686695,3.9920526e-8,7.1414024e-7,0.94622445,0.020610068,0.0024033738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016353432,0.00000566125,0.0026904948,0.0004078058,0.000024383393,0.000026913578,0.0004607208,8.794787e-7,4.5719452e-7,0.0051504937,0.99093735,0.00013130074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19559015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56525105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97032726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026168843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009182147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W37596324","doi":"10.4337/9781781953860","title":"Secrecy, National Security and the Vindication of Constitutional Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Law; Terrorism; Political science; National security; Legislature","score_opus":0.017001823667959128,"score_gpt":0.24750708906433797,"score_spread":0.23050526539637883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W37596324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002514216,0.00033670472,0.0013246462,0.0016263723,0.0009903666,0.00060237775,0.00012371401,0.000078973695,0.9948917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22166008,0.00009817551,0.0002854745,0.0017195436,0.0050059506,0.00011200595,0.00041374555,0.00003735638,0.7706677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997198,0.00030568818,0.0004197128,0.0003388183,0.0014559098,0.0002818574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761635,0.0007526597,0.00048951985,0.00022576597,0.00076554046,0.000150139],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029213182,0.00020153752,0.00035689154,0.00011549015,0.0009492453,0.0011623603,0.00069021777,0.00057331,0.0003179597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070419075,0.00014791754,0.00015182771,0.000048010723,0.05312892,0.0009173016,0.00014689883,0.00061332464,0.000031224125],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010823742,0.00000962425,0.000009560546,0.000026555557,0.00006450459,5.233171e-7,0.004848534,3.035811e-7,6.1120744e-7,0.90905046,0.08549562,0.00048287382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033070197,0.000004828941,0.0000026641171,0.000044012286,0.00002367744,0.0000018161097,0.0001284212,0.0000074599493,0.0000030333563,0.5155344,0.48381284,0.00010615197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015991713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014847312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39831722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029051054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027901328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W376257457","doi":"10.14264/240277","title":"Computer-assisted reporting and freedom of information","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"The University of Queensland","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contempt; Journalism; Freedom of information; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science; Freedom of the press; Currency; Law; Public relations; Economics","score_opus":0.017078635374035495,"score_gpt":0.23701410369102677,"score_spread":0.21993546831699126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W376257457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82387316,0.00023683405,0.008194448,0.00023477187,0.0008490514,0.00046622724,0.000036617454,0.000042951022,0.16606596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738886,0.0007912258,0.0023514086,0.00002782032,0.00014642134,1.5071025e-7,0.00029687624,0.0000098202445,0.022487722],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927425,0.000093515875,0.00025899065,0.0000704475,0.00021135955,0.00009141896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840325,0.00007076559,0.0011960734,0.00011296444,0.00018340694,0.000033554552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005139487,0.00006694129,0.00020892944,0.00006499871,0.00036918104,0.000014279031,0.00015278503,0.00014070186,0.000043195374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006342624,0.000056824134,0.000059473212,0.000103753875,0.0019105386,0.00017026738,0.000013143919,0.00008825561,0.00000203716],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033632168,0.000114534785,0.0121154,0.0008063793,0.00038571318,0.000024826943,0.47823495,0.00006995431,0.000093821334,0.45790297,0.015724374,0.034190774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005065532,0.0005268311,0.15814444,0.0016020344,0.001404502,0.0000246235,0.4001186,0.00085695344,0.00041839678,0.016866762,0.41346583,0.0015055315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003939369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042393412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4410362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002363725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012904713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70394593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W383050908","doi":"","title":"Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation: A Constitutional Analysis, 31 J. Marshall J. Info. Tech. & Privacy L. 1 (2014)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; Law; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.022336684305534434,"score_gpt":0.26828515493679234,"score_spread":0.2459484706312579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W383050908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13330035,0.00019858363,0.013430473,0.0047622733,0.0010881401,0.0009963785,0.00011876774,0.00012147948,0.84598356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807238,0.00011722583,0.0005298939,0.00032018346,0.00023244364,0.0000012976487,0.00007437435,0.000007791782,0.017993012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974767,0.00029780032,0.00034317526,0.000576264,0.00090010255,0.00040593807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978783,0.00019009071,0.00051849865,0.00066641206,0.00042267801,0.00032400794],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006298392,0.00020996272,0.000562434,0.00012961679,0.0030932555,0.00044940284,0.003182322,0.0002210779,0.001072687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052991494,0.00022129127,0.00022093454,0.00069337187,0.0110386005,0.0020883307,0.0011661072,0.00020594265,0.000024814144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000559436,0.000103349106,0.060660858,0.000018950312,0.0004793375,0.000052272775,0.001387868,0.00031834576,0.00014669192,0.9106334,0.025935624,0.00020735066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084131863,0.000026847363,0.023426963,0.00003180452,0.00043091972,0.0000070600026,0.00040690688,0.00036050213,0.00030705036,0.0015218982,0.9722069,0.0004318097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82968855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86378515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9462713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000685727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026727498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W391647378","doi":"","title":"Television Advertising in Canadian Elections: The Attack Mode, 1993 ed. by Walter I. Romanow et al. (review)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; History; Mode (computer interface); Political science; Media studies; Art; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Operating system","score_opus":0.007529550314519036,"score_gpt":0.2503086018840835,"score_spread":0.24277905156956445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W391647378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22721213,0.11011929,0.0037497892,0.06058497,0.0011282391,0.0030829317,0.00022221601,0.00028061384,0.5936198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.846643,0.11093227,0.00038310545,0.0055162916,0.00012175534,0.0000015003164,0.00005202642,0.000024316403,0.03632574],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988974,0.0002299086,0.00012236413,0.00019212737,0.00022629464,0.00033192983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995027,0.000043041422,0.00004921799,0.00019221481,0.00004853527,0.00016425975],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034265095,0.00008919867,0.00015721915,0.000023926565,0.00051728665,0.000018911143,0.00035450765,0.00006398131,0.003497068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006729338,0.00008082921,0.00007988437,0.00008457731,0.00093194225,0.0005965564,0.0000054746315,0.00009182858,0.000055883047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002111612,0.00007951678,0.0005702074,0.000019214047,0.000024511117,0.000012422933,0.024075756,0.000011832113,0.000032053526,0.0065047196,0.847299,0.12134968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021952485,0.00009253344,0.00064772164,0.00012607925,0.000015881835,8.643771e-7,0.0024082703,0.00014017837,0.0000010712838,0.00007660478,0.996151,0.00012027922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94656813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98177946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61943084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006004351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022463438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200287446","doi":"10.1017/9781009039406","title":"Truth and Privilege","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Expression (computer science); Nova scotia; Political science; Centrality; Freedom of expression; Sociology; Human rights; Philosophy; Ethnology","score_opus":0.02095841906725396,"score_gpt":0.21198028903430685,"score_spread":0.1910218699670529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200287446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009042192,0.00046029655,0.0007563045,0.000028828257,0.00070710515,0.00028631726,0.00018682505,0.00013302514,0.9973509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00057722925,0.00050854404,0.000051716812,0.000052601194,0.0006741006,5.091601e-7,0.000047380592,0.00002401459,0.9980639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984492,0.0001800486,0.00012439498,0.0004998737,0.00037772025,0.00036876329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988991,0.00016778213,0.000136452,0.00035046635,0.00015318763,0.00029302886],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018793179,0.0002349016,0.0003731326,0.00009243415,0.00071228936,0.0001224464,0.00046383846,0.0004927967,0.000015009965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032543663,0.00026958727,0.00015463305,0.00001736405,0.008732994,0.00013168513,0.00028751986,0.00035268563,0.0000079815345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010811973,0.00000811398,0.000003230152,0.000044749067,0.000060513587,0.00027255734,0.00080161693,4.4940457e-8,0.0000021669944,0.896407,0.10179448,0.0005947169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037091385,0.000017381632,0.0000055788037,0.000096515585,0.00014939197,0.0000039172187,0.00046616443,0.0000025731308,0.000023946672,0.00012253517,0.99839425,0.00034681495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000298622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045479977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89659977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032628592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008732506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W42011363","doi":"","title":"Is Free Speech Compatible with Human Dignity, Equality, and Democratic Government: America, a Free Speech Island in a Sea of Censorship?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Presupposition; Free speech; Jurisprudence; Democracy; Censorship; Government (linguistics); Political science; Human rights; First amendment; Law; Constitutional law; Sociology; Law and economics; Supreme court; Politics; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016221140783058845,"score_gpt":0.27160724122573715,"score_spread":0.2553861004426783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W42011363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9621441,0.00048284332,0.011520803,0.0018226352,0.0000765787,0.00031937068,0.000032084987,0.000026422349,0.023575174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996303,0.0006573876,0.00029025934,0.00014506295,0.00027739885,0.0000030037077,0.0000021694732,0.000020711836,0.002300994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600834,0.0005338844,0.00043307184,0.0002745529,0.0011137892,0.0016363385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988233,0.00019121717,0.00036213198,0.0003595879,0.000090964575,0.00017283107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029589739,0.00020011276,0.00043925745,0.000086559616,0.00053078687,0.00011773266,0.0007208281,0.00010951405,0.00010802489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016902042,0.00015668751,0.000079096964,0.00036534888,0.002619424,0.00028785874,0.0001161353,0.0009930028,0.000005163052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012548972,0.00033499705,0.18839663,0.000046003355,0.00017495916,0.000011316337,0.00856317,0.0000055467044,0.00023884156,0.7945075,0.00093979936,0.006655752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002946733,0.0009848515,0.0032845873,0.000083119776,0.00007385607,0.00006964349,0.005435379,0.000116263414,0.0003424435,0.98465264,0.0016742393,0.00033626697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055520204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2018228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19627078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064334134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006404262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9651376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205552647","doi":"10.1353/ohq.2017.0039","title":"The Courtship of Eva Eldridge: A Story of Bigamy in the Marriage-Mad Fifties by Diane Simmons","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oregon Historical Quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Comedy; Memoir; Joke; Patience; Estate; Art history; Art; History; Law; Literature; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02009416375966023,"score_gpt":0.2804083751033026,"score_spread":0.26031421134364235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205552647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71368355,0.030593721,0.0036871352,0.09430054,0.013945855,0.0029383565,0.00022453925,0.00021123776,0.14041506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991023,0.00017026196,0.000015780464,0.000039754417,0.00030137066,0.000025863614,0.0000021125418,0.000009964375,0.008411859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978406,0.0006146116,0.000341008,0.00020278647,0.00064991997,0.000351077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775344,0.0009709753,0.0003809965,0.0007063647,0.00009639405,0.00009180107],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018429068,0.0001294255,0.0002915777,0.00004464273,0.0014555003,0.00008524109,0.0012904414,0.00014586533,0.000050812498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041577307,0.00007569573,0.00014482625,0.00012567488,0.006827387,0.00021230831,0.000017709788,0.00029794016,0.000011931537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012825831,0.00043303205,0.0052106897,0.00004216545,0.00004492855,0.000019111336,0.13853273,6.987114e-7,0.0002868839,0.47358468,0.31782222,0.06389463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042809825,0.00044279706,0.003047314,0.000020355317,0.000029465155,6.097171e-7,0.007167235,0.000009441459,0.000032942804,0.011638137,0.9770179,0.00016574771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005759821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061190263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65919566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033297695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000150905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234245804","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.48.4.499","title":"The Freedom of Information Act as a Methodological Tool: Suing the Government for Data","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Freedom of information; Plaintiff; Law; Criminal justice; Political science; Law enforcement; Politics; Mainstream; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.19275959034902068,"score_gpt":0.35423467881222415,"score_spread":0.16147508846320346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234245804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93883526,0.0015687101,0.044713285,0.008598751,0.0012341632,0.00058654265,0.000119718905,0.000018990308,0.0043245717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99261826,0.0006280154,0.0048689335,0.00085280015,0.0007249493,0.000024493043,0.000013953502,0.000016415393,0.0002521573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960497,0.0012445486,0.0008860787,0.0002812661,0.00024113298,0.0012972625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903351,0.007208452,0.0007777088,0.00057985605,0.0005358389,0.00056306634],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008259734,0.0002563638,0.00048431233,0.00016435752,0.0016875562,0.00025723045,0.0018092078,0.0003894893,0.00003751199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017528161,0.00017902402,0.00014398471,0.000117538606,0.0072312765,0.0006172038,0.000109046734,0.0007219895,0.0000023341152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003182759,0.000050616596,0.0008458162,0.00035890666,0.000116249925,0.00027251669,0.03871566,0.00031073802,0.00006211309,0.9335161,0.0032441155,0.022188883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017598097,0.0016053062,0.017600037,0.00016703142,0.012924383,0.0022226567,0.68859243,0.0010326961,0.00011441304,0.068933934,0.20440951,0.0006378046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050111886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25013727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8645822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006856824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035461278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W424334400","doi":"10.4324/9781315224350","title":"Impasse and Grievance Resolution","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Grievance; Collective bargaining; Public sector; Dispute resolution; Compulsory arbitration; Mediation; Political science; Law; Negotiation; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.016315978911111403,"score_gpt":0.2663234995708394,"score_spread":0.250007520659728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W424334400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007524689,0.0008142559,0.0021863135,0.000756005,0.0008427589,0.00023666002,0.000010648276,0.00007817728,0.99506766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00033327413,0.0013554881,0.000121097946,0.00020321252,0.0010724106,0.000002782634,0.000014272437,0.000011813462,0.99688566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990967,0.000043082113,0.00010337345,0.0002406565,0.00029259294,0.0002236178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951077,0.00008867181,0.000076319,0.00017331968,0.000058953483,0.00009197042],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030139674,0.00011025364,0.00017983197,0.000035475307,0.0002591446,0.000074155876,0.0001586956,0.00033554708,0.00052154873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029056531,0.00008673083,0.000041711908,0.00003349354,0.0050210883,0.00011710236,0.00003659442,0.00014294157,0.0003173275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026811379,0.0000027432384,0.000012662577,0.0000103479515,0.000005900921,0.0000012551963,0.0005214169,1.08669276e-7,0.0000011434837,0.7696243,0.22907655,0.0007409011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008903498,0.000023040204,0.000009032189,0.00002673132,0.000013506735,4.379769e-7,0.00006603676,0.000004549001,0.0000010847114,0.08827953,0.9113455,0.00014155671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022723578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034049968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6822689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015652337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045213752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244162264","doi":"10.3233/ip-140324","title":"Brokering Access: Power, Politics and Freedom of Information Process in Canada, by Mike Larsen and Kevin Walby","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information Polity","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Power (physics); Freedom of information; Process (computing); Political science; Political process; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.006776204647356664,"score_gpt":0.24707645942679557,"score_spread":0.2403002547794389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244162264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95783836,0.00004092877,0.0030170602,0.0007701621,0.00019110294,0.00029743116,0.00014824762,0.000029356059,0.03766734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937314,0.000043802393,0.000044490174,0.0004554926,0.000022256761,0.0000052781143,0.000029065963,0.0000019612821,0.000024487725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988729,0.0000517362,0.00043847435,0.00005479948,0.00032858204,0.0002535588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999323,0.000072353076,0.00022512178,0.000101335274,0.00014543138,0.00013274167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048746975,0.00008282166,0.00014951234,0.000090139954,0.0001785623,0.0001443329,0.00016597303,0.000076404394,0.000017719452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002619707,0.000078091485,0.00001207938,0.00015482439,0.00092840777,0.004208851,0.00004732128,0.00008281511,0.000002262502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019720203,0.000026504096,0.20018466,0.0004485421,0.000015345422,1.5633745e-7,0.061870694,0.000080423044,0.000006249602,0.7230954,0.005391916,0.008860377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003985795,0.00013138077,0.3766346,0.00021995099,0.000037432124,0.0000065665768,0.04071398,0.009586899,0.0012769692,0.05048605,0.51577324,0.0011471501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7675745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45023596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6726094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019890066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050173857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5597958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246440081","doi":"10.5688/ajpe7958","title":"Minutes of the 2019 House of Delegates Sessions July 14-17, 2019 Chicago, Illinois","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Northeast Ohio Medical University; University of Texas at Tyler; National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities; Midwestern University; Wilkes University; Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey; Idaho State University; University of South Carolina; University of Oklahoma; University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy; Touro University California; University of Pittsburgh; University of Arizona; University of Georgia; Oklahoma State University; University of Connecticut; University of Southern California; Creighton University; National Association of Chain Drug Stores Foundation","keywords":"Gerontology; Medical education; Medicine; Library science; Family medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.01780870085772078,"score_gpt":0.34638652059083463,"score_spread":0.32857781973311384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246440081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831197,0.0013845764,0.0005130165,0.008455589,0.0027331687,0.00032151255,0.00002352639,0.000015856569,0.0034330266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99447525,0.00088747806,0.00066089554,0.00053209375,0.00046201647,0.0000016030451,0.0000013226675,0.00001529536,0.0029640757],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981132,0.00036366002,0.0005521248,0.00012948645,0.00059066445,0.00025084522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768054,0.00044229627,0.00087931275,0.00021107146,0.0005539869,0.00023281107],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072324264,0.00011266845,0.0003440639,0.000106239815,0.00014232576,0.0000233967,0.0005474719,0.000056361536,0.00041340693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027777796,0.00007187211,0.00022267693,0.0005445948,0.005459999,0.00027761268,0.00003663193,0.00031607956,0.000033955897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007367981,0.005660244,0.103375055,0.00016730001,0.00079603697,0.0000033197773,0.075516865,0.00045929142,0.06919338,0.11379822,0.38406342,0.24623008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027138914,0.0014487887,0.030598067,0.0008542912,0.0010122084,0.00006524616,0.032454703,0.00020662337,0.06469306,0.009835287,0.85521287,0.0009049776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036833805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016336198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47114944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007557636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013191908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99724656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248276570","doi":"10.1017/s104909651100151x","title":"People","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PS Political Science & Politics","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh; University of California, Irvine; Western Carolina University; Colorado State University; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Long Island University; Claremont Graduate University; University of South Alabama; College of Charleston; University of Central Florida; Northern Arizona University; University of Ghana; Dartmouth College; Louisiana State University; University of Nebraska Kearney; University of Oklahoma; Illinois State University; Wayne State University; Valdosta State University; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; University of Connecticut; Brigham Young University; Texas Tech University; University of Cambridge; University of Pittsburgh; Syracuse University; American Political Science Association; Ohio State University; University of Washington; University of Rochester; Northern Illinois University; State University of New York; Princeton University; Texas Christian University; Jackson State University; West Virginia University; Florida State University; National Science Foundation; Purdue University; Rhodes College; Georgia Southern University; George Mason University; York University; University of Miami; Wellesley College; University of Maryland, Baltimore County; University of Minnesota; Yale University","keywords":"State (computer science); Voting; Political science; Representation (politics); Politics; Devolution (biology); Public administration; Enforcement; Public opinion; African american; Sociology; Law; Ethnology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.056838959266595296,"score_gpt":0.3263878300794043,"score_spread":0.269548870812809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248276570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11637122,0.00002365895,0.0048318617,0.00258507,0.0012726363,0.00021255045,0.000019154866,0.00023992754,0.87444395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99164164,0.000008841211,0.0010388679,0.0015529749,0.00087925955,0.000008157466,9.865919e-7,0.000012013317,0.004857238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951578,0.000098700206,0.00027758235,0.00041896052,0.0010780296,0.0029689723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705416,0.00018398036,0.00004674972,0.00039762806,0.000286612,0.0020308557],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012512228,0.00015212529,0.00020283992,0.00013896619,0.001602463,0.00017757513,0.0010786402,0.00012266208,0.001130586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013122299,0.00012945973,0.00009670436,0.0006261383,0.054866258,0.00059249887,0.00014362282,0.00017766259,0.0006378965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010740488,0.00008599886,0.0062302276,0.0000033023393,0.000002179484,0.0000049498212,0.010781392,3.38568e-8,0.000025242247,0.9825374,0.00020191599,0.00012629802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017452978,0.00007853679,0.012830658,0.000010032104,0.000023290315,0.0000074319905,0.0072779264,0.000043866785,0.001339599,0.9372485,0.040606026,0.00035958138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010898569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080110267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8752704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005256751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014495967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288071802","doi":"10.1017/jme.2022.52","title":"Balancing the Scales: The Role of the Canadian Supreme Court in Weighing Commercial Speech and Public Health","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Jurisprudence; Proportionality (law); Law; Commercial speech; Political science; Public health; First amendment; Medicine","score_opus":0.08208112767814006,"score_gpt":0.34503462867861423,"score_spread":0.26295350100047415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288071802","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1261888,0.003726195,0.000068306246,0.85847276,0.0013338253,0.00033204877,0.000008411926,0.000005218573,0.009864439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842911,0.0006396626,0.000010372333,0.014133438,0.00084847776,0.0000013310266,4.1805603e-7,0.000008110052,0.00006712981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941699,0.0034014364,0.0004947334,0.00007173612,0.0014661257,0.0003960891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966976,0.0021763192,0.00047304385,0.0002508496,0.00021149151,0.00019069202],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.030691765,0.000089550536,0.00026128703,0.00005715907,0.0044654678,0.000044109376,0.0011963597,0.0000788345,0.00007788104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008750646,0.000034703855,0.000057241075,0.00039495956,0.010648694,0.00011342728,0.000117925505,0.002512681,3.109383e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001525348,0.000020711397,0.00716022,0.000008848006,0.000024500476,0.0000038348703,0.3613604,0.00002952359,0.000023076136,0.62749344,0.0018317582,0.0020284513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008254622,0.0002658821,0.0076475255,0.00020863967,0.00006908534,0.00013276974,0.25901896,0.00016661844,0.000012189218,0.08692676,0.64460796,0.00011812894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45372766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9095689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85810226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038131198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00241216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295733443","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4201503","title":"Lost Synergies and M&amp;amp;A Damages: Considering Cineplex v. Cineworld","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Chemistry; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02504738889612775,"score_gpt":0.279096739690091,"score_spread":0.2540493507939633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295733443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8335537,0.03527137,0.038634185,0.024977315,0.0035937643,0.00070971635,0.00002871533,0.00034938543,0.06288187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498079,0.007007933,0.00014324802,0.0003048065,0.0010234866,0.0000070978613,0.000004246578,0.000025672218,0.04167564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967095,0.00027711314,0.00026843068,0.00023673094,0.00054922095,0.001958994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926895,0.00016492812,0.0001571869,0.00017476802,0.000070224756,0.00016395972],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025306095,0.00015283424,0.00022585689,0.00014838319,0.0024776477,0.00018131953,0.00036177694,0.000051074294,0.0012303563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015219893,0.00013973059,0.000092387636,0.0003194896,0.0021605645,0.00030212186,0.0001291906,0.001591692,0.000044145847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024886634,0.000046307163,0.0018908733,0.0000040139166,0.00008648963,0.000009514191,0.0043485183,0.00004784691,0.00020914468,0.9869498,0.003894231,0.0024883915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005317868,0.00009645821,0.00005979272,0.000008858589,0.000035782938,0.0002920259,0.01782947,0.000007652165,0.0000064407154,0.37200758,0.60889804,0.0002261051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006337015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022840068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6149422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008030517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020032523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322615364","doi":"10.29173/wclawr94","title":"Virtual Searches: Regulating the Covert World of Technological Policing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Covert; Government (linguistics); Political science; Emerging technologies; Universality (dynamical systems); Public relations; Law; Computer security; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07157165953987583,"score_gpt":0.3399310803626818,"score_spread":0.268359420822806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322615364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035698842,0.04167466,0.0068019126,0.27563405,0.0022946806,0.0074122264,0.00004514543,0.0030789834,0.6273595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97272146,0.017300379,0.000017188559,0.0018508345,0.00029001918,0.00004773282,0.00000458742,0.000013491472,0.0077543086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980533,0.00064302055,0.00034512967,0.00017158725,0.00047322476,0.00031374508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998641,0.0006387233,0.00017092343,0.0003993011,0.0001013637,0.00004865451],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038096937,0.00010316629,0.00026406394,0.000039453153,0.0010570203,0.000042051517,0.0005380601,0.00006757507,0.00033370283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003535806,0.00005195559,0.00012872706,0.0014795288,0.009389855,0.00012883963,0.000113166,0.00023909437,0.00022878726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025146035,0.0000073079723,0.000059024143,0.000066963825,0.000016104694,4.2957353e-7,0.00076113414,0.000009045407,0.0000436113,0.9873151,0.0022088005,0.0095099425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001094205,0.000030484798,0.00015519705,0.0008626397,0.000058312995,0.0000024209414,0.0011953693,0.00009299006,0.00012187051,0.013216328,0.98404217,0.00011276903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012052791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012720748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006968794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006743632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99330604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377254410","doi":"10.1515/9780773580961-011","title":"Letting the Elephants Watch the Mice: The Surrender of Canadian Anti-Bribery Legislation to American Jurisdiction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surrender; Jurisdiction; Legislation; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.01856754626343703,"score_gpt":0.22381557516337824,"score_spread":0.2052480288999412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377254410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038114196,0.0000026894863,0.00026423612,0.0063526584,0.0008899284,0.00090757315,0.00029571628,0.00006904466,0.99083704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16732205,0.00021409191,0.000041380434,0.00049055135,0.000581598,0.000002560917,0.00001992293,0.000040162042,0.8312877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792325,0.00028756342,0.00024595475,0.00039943302,0.0006363542,0.0005074218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813235,0.0003152459,0.00043462604,0.0006007978,0.00029793064,0.00021906188],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071509153,0.0002839287,0.00032851018,0.00022051159,0.0033856123,0.0000870444,0.0011302261,0.0003163361,0.00003755624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003205422,0.00018002982,0.00021927836,0.00010054887,0.00658761,0.0001440489,0.00017500264,0.00074715045,0.000010789817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016893402,0.000005504201,0.000029839253,0.0000063267394,0.000109721004,0.000009813432,0.00567948,0.000013483571,0.000030617895,0.9872745,0.0036741984,0.0031495886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012533121,0.000021848999,0.000102498365,0.00004039411,0.0001561329,8.2106664e-7,0.0011039682,0.000005088988,0.00017626419,0.0007943202,0.9972219,0.00025145093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4927868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04073943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026853356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028480808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378070804","doi":"10.31542/cb.v5i1.2520","title":"The Abortion Debate","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crossing Borders Student Reflections on Global Social Issues","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Betrayal; Happiness; Abortion; Qualitative analysis; Psychology; Content analysis; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Pregnancy","score_opus":0.05112047457574114,"score_gpt":0.47537328662825357,"score_spread":0.4242528120525124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378070804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4798982,0.001336098,0.003279422,0.055087827,0.011980759,0.0013503362,0.00005450774,0.0036377218,0.4433751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757435,0.00072297564,0.00004017286,0.00024878763,0.0016341103,0.000047397076,0.000009813358,0.000016547809,0.021536727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977907,0.00023116785,0.00024768506,0.000302543,0.0007799191,0.0006480009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935627,0.000073856645,0.00010843617,0.00016619585,0.00019607786,0.00009917599],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007419114,0.00015504299,0.00016231321,0.000048095255,0.024465138,0.002353,0.00039981477,0.00015946174,0.00003413739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014931777,0.00012134382,0.00014991777,0.0016201035,0.011752471,0.00020069223,0.00005888208,0.0001586076,0.00026176494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029762514,0.00012572607,0.0025867717,0.000003092342,0.00008424106,0.000009037113,0.044715814,0.000042122083,0.000034009514,0.89733666,0.035635166,0.019397622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023837984,0.000052208525,0.012974662,0.000012372506,0.000026311258,3.5507327e-7,0.026827004,0.0000066376406,0.000016705178,0.03900179,0.9206493,0.00019426514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004636269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014667015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8850141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057067943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027534633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379433122","doi":"10.1353/see.2008.0136","title":"Ruling Russia: Law, Crime, and Justice in a Changing Society by William A. Pridemore (review)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Slavonic and East European Review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Psychology; Politics; Character (mathematics); Law; Political science; Social psychology; Media studies; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03119827313987035,"score_gpt":0.2726562592101601,"score_spread":0.2414579860702898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379433122","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006070469,0.9280825,0.00026357695,0.0043812236,0.00012860313,0.0005824597,0.000005892764,0.000053346816,0.06589533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031322427,0.95660704,0.00010078544,0.00877462,0.0002893041,0.000008163319,0.0000048548122,0.000021156244,0.002871628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808705,0.0006331867,0.00033626833,0.0002842595,0.00023165593,0.00042755748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993936,0.00007906907,0.00013543217,0.0002282911,0.000033182274,0.00013047151],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026800605,0.0001734169,0.00039209265,0.000016264376,0.0010737872,0.000029812265,0.0002778705,0.000032427753,0.00005579006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000897663,0.0001091477,0.00011425729,0.00036608215,0.0034171536,0.00016487513,0.000118821365,0.0002245122,0.00006897295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012458898,0.00017440358,0.00032370834,0.020001268,0.00014810059,0.00014277868,0.044264723,0.0000014021784,0.000028847517,0.6251021,0.1837703,0.1260299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024219631,0.000018091994,0.00012027154,0.007712869,0.00024518164,0.00004459363,0.00058326946,0.000021939557,6.4795967e-7,0.00022498629,0.9905568,0.00022917346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003815685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015384485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8067865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028087446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004866583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383457116","doi":"10.1097/01.eem.0000946648.56133.a7","title":"Risk Aversion Trumps Risk Tolerance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emergency Medicine News","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Medicine; Chest pain; Feeling; Plaintiff; Aspirin; Family medicine; Medical emergency; Internal medicine; Psychology; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.03428392572227773,"score_gpt":0.3248279960389926,"score_spread":0.29054407031671486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383457116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5633235,0.0029632824,0.008004269,0.014361503,0.039553504,0.0010148846,0.000058315436,0.0013605729,0.36936015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7298255,0.097860396,0.00010224606,0.00023540467,0.011525324,0.00003535473,0.000040956133,0.000046115205,0.1603287],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766827,0.00033833014,0.00040772467,0.00035343238,0.00072025706,0.0005119736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989811,0.00012543576,0.0002101385,0.0003291244,0.00008951903,0.0002646826],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001292776,0.00015340338,0.00026036453,0.00012715421,0.00104883,0.0000057360494,0.00038457802,0.00012284958,0.012171479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086330326,0.00011443858,0.000115293136,0.0011394129,0.0024927864,0.00017600422,0.00004055596,0.0002408685,0.0017176388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017112328,0.000028937877,0.09010008,0.000010881954,0.000022564724,0.000008639341,0.028267192,0.000033840286,0.00007242435,0.029698225,0.84196836,0.009771772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005619538,0.00009208592,0.012313678,0.000028749284,0.000058258593,2.255665e-7,0.0053996276,0.00023026917,0.00001961437,0.016617749,0.964485,0.00019278166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013249375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053246594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20903145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049583843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006476864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080232","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3880","title":"Saving the News: Why the Constitution Calls for Government Action to Preserve Freedom of Speech by Martha Minow","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Misinformation; Democracy; Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Freedom of the press; Political science; First amendment; Interpretation (philosophy); The Internet; Law and economics; Law; Public relations; Sociology; Supreme court; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04633587260751777,"score_gpt":0.30485156536780866,"score_spread":0.2585156927602909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03246766,0.0010869035,0.14323574,0.11841019,0.009838026,0.004192054,0.0005675763,0.00022699674,0.68997484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934454,0.00029656087,0.00048506426,0.00046603885,0.0015900517,0.000028769804,0.0000051023194,0.000011195913,0.0036718182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807113,0.00023307638,0.0002970846,0.00015617962,0.0008701174,0.0003724071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989094,0.0003912787,0.00021681775,0.00020408408,0.00013777074,0.00014064086],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017155003,0.00010704781,0.00015219225,0.000017704446,0.0018516623,0.0002328498,0.0005172221,0.00009072805,0.00012933185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021919508,0.00006143377,0.00015251656,0.00020455262,0.0022569082,0.0003056889,0.00006215275,0.00019673038,0.000022636925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005452236,0.000036718273,0.0003950423,0.00000993817,0.000056851597,0.0000038998587,0.0022643805,0.00021319794,0.0015715534,0.89532226,0.0943167,0.0057549635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007079902,0.00014555498,0.0002621492,0.000083374005,0.000086378204,0.000022250346,0.008847788,0.00021952762,0.0023043402,0.07081804,0.9163107,0.00019189433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024895832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23473553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96097773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001975453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009560653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99944776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385854826","doi":"10.59962/9780774818735-009","title":"Kelowna and the Constitutional Debate about Public-Area Video Surveillance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.026045344300545285,"score_gpt":0.18627408710150156,"score_spread":0.16022874280095628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385854826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013676185,0.0010596609,0.0010095221,0.00006377393,0.00031450935,0.0005050408,0.0006375975,0.00007598834,0.99619716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07536049,0.0027574392,0.000060453716,0.00005920005,0.00012871837,8.4916957e-7,0.00002183654,0.000012636204,0.9215984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985085,0.00013587045,0.00019931079,0.0003904912,0.0004652942,0.00030050142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998638,0.00020859837,0.00029041522,0.0002661103,0.00041494117,0.00018196992],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005540591,0.00012945851,0.00044225,0.000031856227,0.0011687895,0.00029965237,0.00064310746,0.0003722092,0.0010258915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004514521,0.0002080596,0.00018691333,0.0000103041375,0.071655266,0.00016069147,0.00023415705,0.00026426584,0.000006325051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003017124,0.000009848526,0.00014623327,0.000023373203,0.00012930366,0.000083469546,0.0013037181,8.468098e-8,1.3496178e-7,0.9628652,0.024164632,0.0112438295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012198193,0.000015231959,0.00019895048,0.00015981967,0.00006936502,0.000022575801,0.00011893628,0.0000032497642,1.01023524e-7,0.054504037,0.9434111,0.00027679605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21054542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5321295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9192465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000073088086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042939666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388590835","doi":"10.52975/llt.2023v92.0021","title":"Constance Backhouse, Reckoning with Racism: Police, Judges and the RDS Case (Vancouver: UBC Press 2022)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Racism; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01550394707676329,"score_gpt":0.25092927777075436,"score_spread":0.23542533069399108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388590835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85415006,0.0034637528,0.0012461605,0.0035648032,0.0013953595,0.0011171041,0.0001467839,0.00082171336,0.13409428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90932876,0.001971032,0.00014685527,0.00044402288,0.00043459682,0.000047396865,0.0000023882683,0.000032048156,0.08759291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823296,0.00031572618,0.00020078402,0.00033150887,0.0003982698,0.0005207373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891686,0.00040841583,0.00011103778,0.00029996003,0.00010879707,0.00015492801],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010090176,0.00016481012,0.00026579463,0.00004312476,0.001326706,0.00021206711,0.00028452746,0.0001134186,0.00011370293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066919674,0.00010561959,0.0000477648,0.00050251046,0.009549475,0.00029841432,0.000051156137,0.00021861825,0.000040896368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001705079,0.000045486064,0.0018211306,0.000045068693,0.00009219006,0.00048628997,0.09765686,0.000036469777,0.000022371549,0.83865225,0.052893914,0.008077477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005781288,0.000103134895,0.0012811576,0.0000837998,0.00008802213,0.00015357237,0.07884375,0.0001820766,0.00018276247,0.010077709,0.90253913,0.00068362267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021567896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15734485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8496452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003680169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021602248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388714595","doi":"10.1017/9781108995825.002","title":"The Traditionalist Approach to Privacy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Dichotomy; Secrecy; Nothing; Internet privacy; Argument (complex analysis); Information privacy; Computer security; Computer science; Privacy software; Private information retrieval; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059520909815532895,"score_gpt":0.23060120669881962,"score_spread":0.17108029688328671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388714595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000055546716,0.000038926093,0.0023342734,0.00024214174,0.00065663183,0.0006279941,0.00031542926,0.0002538694,0.9955252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00035255752,0.0001865283,0.000060957413,0.00009776023,0.00077937293,0.000002642669,0.00006160542,0.000039021044,0.9984196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831635,0.00008603122,0.00015159138,0.00044640142,0.0006047193,0.00039492777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871117,0.00022787735,0.00012372456,0.0004800268,0.00015747175,0.00029972856],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034004534,0.00023445352,0.00024864465,0.000097867814,0.0019809355,0.00016733195,0.0011959667,0.0003089899,0.0000046415885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031290976,0.00021056998,0.00023345645,0.000021672036,0.006996009,0.000087074994,0.00023679249,0.00033231493,0.000091222006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018778182,0.000006254642,2.3100976e-7,0.00001069961,0.0000635702,0.000029295206,0.0008455627,0.0000010238414,5.4139946e-7,0.81657517,0.18204165,0.00040720627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001757503,0.000014820863,0.0000054420093,0.000034414403,0.00007705757,0.0000013852359,0.00033871987,0.000006071049,0.0000028226766,0.0011683761,0.99787605,0.00029907923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000445867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035235822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8158344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002950968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002704223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388987941","doi":"10.1515/9781552383193-005","title":"Not an Old Cowhand— Frod Stimson and the Bar IT Ranch <sup>1</sup>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Parks Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.024011175007252,"score_gpt":0.20985707168190595,"score_spread":0.18584589667465395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388987941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002683837,0.0003469169,0.000782342,0.00012013486,0.00009851384,0.0005933579,0.00007102565,0.00006762523,0.9976517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00559853,0.0015774905,0.00014799091,0.00023092376,0.00027231692,4.634246e-7,0.000022112086,0.000025422536,0.99212474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829847,0.00019799035,0.0001955579,0.00043447624,0.00057339127,0.00030011308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988252,0.00021246835,0.00017697088,0.0004470863,0.00011442642,0.00022383957],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004252442,0.0002680486,0.0005285765,0.00007657894,0.0008868833,0.00006470385,0.0007340801,0.00051403773,0.00097359583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009206454,0.00023069097,0.00020879235,0.000007677662,0.016175143,0.00017248883,0.00013603322,0.0003860092,0.000017400735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005226997,0.000012942469,0.0000024107553,0.000023269224,0.00010787091,0.000037098747,0.02509537,0.000007627627,0.0000010818131,0.96200633,0.0010634831,0.011119829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022939818,0.0000673016,0.0000038868943,0.00010809038,0.00029940213,0.000002107759,0.0006152595,0.00032562224,0.000009839418,0.020939514,0.9750043,0.0003306899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00781421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018144484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97394085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055005166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014664145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390126897","doi":"10.1017/9781009052047.006","title":"Police Interrogation Reform in the United States: Paths to Consider","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interrogation; Suspect; Legislature; Political science; State (computer science); Deception; Law; Law reform; Right to counsel; Criminology; Sociology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.05525317091196257,"score_gpt":0.2637911277525445,"score_spread":0.2085379568405819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390126897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00085890474,0.000006059844,0.00036093625,0.0003183807,0.00034520114,0.0006268503,0.00020167905,0.00015484195,0.9971272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0051763467,0.00011831069,0.0000125214165,0.00066536287,0.00020680204,0.0000019051839,0.00013523446,0.00002809675,0.99365544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853903,0.00015213857,0.00018735681,0.00033910235,0.00043247695,0.00034991823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989423,0.00019588791,0.00013605738,0.0003824517,0.00018975144,0.0001535459],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004420837,0.0002178343,0.0002431039,0.00037531255,0.00044528296,0.000091006776,0.00072080566,0.0003125318,0.0000077967725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013444283,0.00018980479,0.00011439052,0.00006252817,0.0028723804,0.0001082317,0.00019236334,0.0003761252,0.00007142604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029229574,0.000005884041,0.0000013872626,0.000014190776,0.00003027774,0.00008017265,0.028044395,0.0000042637425,6.8759897e-7,0.9556608,0.015974332,0.00015436392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002882054,0.000036510373,0.000010008283,0.00013104622,0.000053598782,0.0000013907392,0.025854303,0.000021188187,0.000005121527,0.00032778672,0.97300315,0.00026770934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067230985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010478673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9570288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008946787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002279295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390284132","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-45347-2_4","title":"Racial Integration and Affirmative Action","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Race (biology); Political science; White (mutation); Racial equality; Law; Action (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Racism; Gender studies","score_opus":0.17431460304235513,"score_gpt":0.3928796704759999,"score_spread":0.2185650674336448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390284132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021495215,0.0015726028,0.0006891189,0.010925844,0.006587733,0.0010086376,0.00009358337,0.00037493682,0.9785326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09791143,0.021285053,0.00022969056,0.00042486584,0.004841405,0.00011091041,0.00007867231,0.0000933535,0.8750246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979633,0.0001540138,0.00044375498,0.00049611577,0.0005667336,0.00037606276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855345,0.00075665285,0.0002214549,0.00016480645,0.00018332715,0.00012030407],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005357137,0.0003375252,0.000623501,0.00020078906,0.00058432954,0.0000905608,0.00017728227,0.00055732485,0.00006858064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035651342,0.0002783848,0.00014851544,0.0001152024,0.014771443,0.00009811081,0.00015560663,0.0006639752,0.00012916907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002112104,0.0000063607795,0.000005979962,0.000027276472,0.00010036251,0.000026209626,0.043964148,2.5704236e-7,0.0000018780995,0.93223464,0.0045746835,0.019037096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027783,0.00006386851,0.000046277604,0.00026407777,0.000058016874,7.733364e-7,0.0030503494,0.000014524454,0.000004291795,0.78858894,0.20730546,0.00032557565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000083898754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072271936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20273077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033893812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008240429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390927157","doi":"10.1515/9780776621838-006","title":"CHAPTER IV Lawful Illegality: What Snowden Has Taught Us about the Legal Infrastructure of the Surveillance State","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Law; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Algorithm","score_opus":0.03173833477042393,"score_gpt":0.2250483223077567,"score_spread":0.19330998753733278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390927157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060498284,0.0009926299,0.0001825814,0.0006476659,0.0010381219,0.00064984773,0.00038147115,0.000049451897,0.99545324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12655365,0.0006406164,0.000041274354,0.000099306984,0.00027965402,3.444135e-7,0.000011708297,0.000034438162,0.872339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976882,0.00021286751,0.00031619254,0.00039940717,0.0010238698,0.00035949788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975715,0.0001242684,0.00074617536,0.00083204603,0.00056898285,0.00015699741],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006891243,0.00032715785,0.00056472677,0.00006619297,0.0008304932,0.0001594123,0.0017573691,0.00041916833,0.0003244776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026070948,0.00022869118,0.00035476848,0.000020287098,0.020464223,0.00034392762,0.00042916808,0.00051169493,0.0000072632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045304943,0.0000073687047,0.0001102729,0.00003741901,0.00017774674,0.000016434835,0.013288637,0.000026187752,0.0000038429944,0.9759509,0.007833524,0.0025023476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043967288,0.000029035762,0.00016842934,0.00014820417,0.000091086724,0.0000022974757,0.0007036741,0.0000068864147,0.000028322997,0.016795123,0.98130286,0.0002844266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009982897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03160472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9734693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001277604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044637534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392021910","doi":"10.51644/9780889208605","title":"Breaking Anonymity","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Internet privacy; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.018087779672866434,"score_gpt":0.26423032432840043,"score_spread":0.246142544655534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392021910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000018037688,0.00012931981,0.005200237,0.00019476372,0.0007948477,0.00017560663,0.000011825515,0.00020685517,0.99328476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003576145,0.00004264834,0.00019852215,0.00021714778,0.0032231372,0.0000030363012,0.000035018948,0.000018729253,0.99590415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987231,0.000053675154,0.00017396573,0.0002587698,0.00047134917,0.00031916608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943584,0.00009871167,0.00010150157,0.00020201126,0.00007233578,0.00008961793],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033800094,0.00014736854,0.00022991367,0.00005262222,0.0005042109,0.00011353062,0.00034434508,0.0004531804,0.0029586626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017271635,0.00012068498,0.00014618335,0.000055123943,0.007366431,0.00011334387,0.00003744623,0.00018718865,0.00050413155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.6490055e-7,0.000005939345,0.000015717027,0.0000038990083,0.0000056518734,0.0000066932716,0.0002114645,1.022058e-7,1.1321746e-7,0.578272,0.42032608,0.0011518889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061724764,0.000004972218,0.000007304349,0.00001862107,0.00001666666,4.0435418e-7,0.000025099553,7.8789526e-7,9.2026573e-7,0.16549581,0.834191,0.00017669029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027990532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011846185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4138649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026264024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006618049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99795276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392905901","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4731623","title":"Advanced Constitutional Law: Free Speech","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Law; Constitutional law; Political science","score_opus":0.009425681393465285,"score_gpt":0.2751976409869994,"score_spread":0.2657719595935341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392905901","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012446788,0.047099635,0.28085193,0.017347507,0.0082114,0.00045822634,0.00003510609,0.0005985553,0.63295084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97088087,0.006012388,0.000268083,0.00020183735,0.0023736905,0.0000037888028,0.0000031951565,0.000012187661,0.020243958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720114,0.00009781562,0.00019850326,0.00019272022,0.000523127,0.0017866668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951535,0.00008822607,0.000043903652,0.00013091843,0.00008616855,0.00013544255],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017803463,0.00010877907,0.00012647483,0.000070333444,0.0009588296,0.00023530216,0.00044076456,0.00009839981,0.000382356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008477505,0.00008863948,0.00013869062,0.00022436782,0.008179406,0.0005202845,0.000028618286,0.0012314238,0.00021816452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009513828,0.000019184103,0.000028589053,0.0000026046932,0.000064969274,0.000028010225,0.00048991333,0.00000573599,0.0000619332,0.9847087,0.0011200744,0.013460761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020782388,0.00004387395,0.0000014815828,0.00001869609,0.000015814687,0.00015896147,0.001000046,0.000009356613,0.000029573072,0.6477093,0.35071114,0.00009394291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019675195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007115433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011404792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005921058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99971443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395059442","doi":"10.29173/alr2694","title":"Constitutional Change Without Constitutional Amendment - A Review of Constitutional Pariah: Reference Re Senate Reform and The Future of Parliament, Emmett Macfarlane (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2021)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Pariah group; Law; Political science; Constitutional amendment; Constitutional review; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.07726802497334977,"score_gpt":0.33505212557501396,"score_spread":0.2577841006016642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395059442","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.8724933e-8,0.86977077,0.00004318881,0.0016778153,0.001282568,0.0046000113,0.0010939258,0.000017183847,0.121514544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000023540579,0.9933696,0.00010637215,0.002350584,0.0007255441,0.0015283282,0.00095899514,0.000015946336,0.0009211215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99295014,0.0017721669,0.0022194271,0.0008469002,0.001632206,0.0005791597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950935,0.00097027,0.0024516152,0.0008798087,0.00034612176,0.00025863995],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034188365,0.0007225409,0.0039623594,0.000053950745,0.0010067099,0.000049791084,0.0010682077,0.0003300441,0.004751247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036136786,0.00043812653,0.00089609966,0.00058090995,0.08182189,0.00037390558,0.00039724726,0.0007699108,0.000029732058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001803933,0.00008769594,0.0000020966518,0.09338025,0.0003841063,0.00000735482,0.00008357476,3.5013542e-8,1.2417903e-8,0.84205973,0.010777604,0.05319951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005707116,0.000032350094,4.517331e-8,0.1581451,0.00231614,0.0000617481,0.000046932942,2.2556796e-7,1.2868034e-7,0.0009204805,0.8374752,0.00043095383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005331524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049309353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84113926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005725768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023349724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395067264","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i4.1367","title":"Reckoning with Racism: Police, Judges and the RDS Case","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.025843342562406908,"score_gpt":0.28535590776704206,"score_spread":0.25951256520463517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395067264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12551764,0.00033195666,0.0003680635,0.012949028,0.0010160176,0.00031278934,0.000024978759,0.00021103487,0.8592685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963178,0.00039676376,0.0001364966,0.00035830363,0.0006800584,0.000003782901,4.9560606e-7,0.000011594482,0.002094698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988319,0.00024002015,0.00014885589,0.00011519359,0.00032294146,0.00034106954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993175,0.00023437239,0.000092108094,0.00010309992,0.00008066456,0.00017222784],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015261256,0.00008320746,0.00014114626,0.000044611174,0.009187788,0.00021106227,0.00016097938,0.00005626582,0.0001010924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000470667,0.000043134947,0.000049885002,0.00028856957,0.00587744,0.0002667402,0.000037550864,0.00024049792,0.000032153886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003681598,0.0000065525205,0.00021451764,0.0000021360665,0.000029293144,0.00060740515,0.0074023446,0.00000788781,0.0000014559581,0.9874392,0.0008189598,0.0034334413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017883896,0.00006559645,0.00010199813,0.0000339797,0.000057699694,0.004046503,0.01729913,0.00006644129,0.00002757918,0.020451648,0.9558749,0.00018613513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067979186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064866945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96698755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040265008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016647771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396714816","doi":"10.29173/mlj1352","title":"Purchasing Privacy and R v Picard: Dwelling Places on Public Property","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Purchasing; Property (philosophy); Business; Internet privacy; Marketing; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06845747299539985,"score_gpt":0.2847631322785204,"score_spread":0.21630565928312057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396714816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86856014,0.00036596,0.0016977413,0.023180991,0.0028054756,0.00043607055,0.000004905002,0.00042991908,0.10251881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960732,0.0004791029,0.00016106052,0.00027502273,0.0021329287,0.0000037235836,0.0000013946859,0.000017838895,0.0008557505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982849,0.0002172984,0.00021657086,0.00019762949,0.00056923646,0.0005143665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992851,0.00012743172,0.00010201938,0.00012211266,0.0000940028,0.00026934707],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012986904,0.0001173149,0.0001591882,0.00010982447,0.0030833061,0.0010202994,0.0003250201,0.00009049087,0.00007764463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014074183,0.000073770316,0.00006671881,0.00027288424,0.0026839545,0.00053494243,0.00006735879,0.00033197124,0.00012913445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039401457,0.000082915714,0.005181888,0.000020663041,0.000070824055,0.00021139345,0.013572292,0.000040060895,0.00008768616,0.8934516,0.00651001,0.080731265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005378047,0.0001170859,0.00048419734,0.000087542314,0.000020574807,0.000060607425,0.0270505,0.0001740989,0.0000811516,0.043840144,0.92727816,0.00026814442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015971678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013477253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92076814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105304796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007994223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99821454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396724679","doi":"10.61838/kman.isslp.3.1.4","title":"Impact of Anti-Discrimination Laws on University Campuses: Student and Faculty Views","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.059573054824984914,"score_gpt":0.3798760870846183,"score_spread":0.32030303225963336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396724679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9391582,0.00007123748,0.0009004915,0.00021158518,0.00016125836,0.00014935959,0.000021305945,0.000052806623,0.05927376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99212515,0.00018993639,0.000025353715,0.000009341381,0.000047091173,2.017113e-7,0.0000044656786,0.0000023338835,0.0075961156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999457,0.00007079114,0.00006353362,0.00012319807,0.00018792557,0.00009752162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997877,0.00004917889,0.000020243171,0.000057350862,0.000031060303,0.00005447899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002365548,0.00005262948,0.00009641712,0.000046593785,0.00015009228,0.00004665982,0.000088988236,0.000042660176,0.0001738886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010495618,0.000033308235,0.000062185296,0.00013305889,0.001168552,0.00018486097,0.000020370047,0.00003858833,0.000016085683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008420423,0.000079060424,0.0165485,0.000021100816,0.000049720726,0.0000095843325,0.035123385,0.0000054945363,0.0001229007,0.9374729,0.004265339,0.00629364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021471824,0.002121117,0.39938003,0.0003114654,0.00038210928,0.0000033292754,0.07693913,0.00047762736,0.00092171406,0.011217476,0.5051445,0.00095431827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021626286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020025906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9262554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009792093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058859903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43055785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398489125","doi":"10.7910/dvn/mc7p4a","title":"Placer County, CA November 7, 2000 general election over/under report","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mitel (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Placer mining; Placer deposit; Geology; Archaeology; Geochemistry; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.024483585503663023,"score_gpt":0.29260320204378093,"score_spread":0.2681196165401179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398489125","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000037394344,0.000006162015,0.00035911822,0.000030517735,0.0051517407,0.00045028352,0.9788913,0.000113311675,0.014960133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000062010918,0.0005044954,0.000092726536,0.00089689257,0.0047966847,0.00003084265,0.9347713,0.000035930974,0.05886491],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958802,0.00026030783,0.00055979367,0.0008572095,0.0016491018,0.00079342735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718255,0.000084509884,0.00047002485,0.0014605585,0.00035024533,0.0004521005],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015479596,0.00043146525,0.0005250609,0.00017325449,0.00069205824,0.0003811042,0.0008272232,0.0008541687,0.074033275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003373442,0.00040044406,0.00017699038,0.00035176997,0.003692008,0.00087174156,0.0002516052,0.00057418377,0.047883786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005295308,0.00011020379,0.000017340446,0.00002038549,0.00010427555,0.00039007998,0.00017970825,0.000014264188,0.0000030818217,0.0045156167,0.99456376,0.000028332042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005829666,0.000033728422,0.000011701947,0.00002749602,0.00020137384,0.00007121537,0.00014458346,0.000015552383,0.0000027804683,0.00084134995,0.99747944,0.0005877995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0372367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041958682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04412002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013164714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027472323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398762536","doi":"10.29173/mlj888","title":"Wedge Issue Politics in Manitoba: Bill 18 - The Public Schools Amendment Act (Safe and Inclusive Schools)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wedge (geometry); Politics; Amendment; Political science; First amendment; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.027618093188612716,"score_gpt":0.2831282439382165,"score_spread":0.2555101507496038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398762536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64932626,0.0018065633,0.003965866,0.12322564,0.007925117,0.001925162,0.000039488004,0.00021326543,0.21157263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99149853,0.0006113856,0.00022814011,0.0021417234,0.005039783,0.000014425248,0.0000026285386,0.000026551872,0.00043685743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966423,0.0008030154,0.0005037504,0.00029787212,0.0008320079,0.0009210903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984248,0.00022220376,0.00025864394,0.0003143946,0.00024045509,0.00053946796],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023721426,0.00024707225,0.00031940808,0.00015820641,0.0034701468,0.0014049152,0.00082382414,0.00018550262,0.0003874796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003339431,0.00015144197,0.00011024962,0.00030662733,0.0031772922,0.000871895,0.0002541578,0.0010376209,0.00026805289],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014548598,0.00011889158,0.01469869,0.000010006844,0.000051353345,0.000055271157,0.0023294392,0.0000033557078,0.00003224556,0.9588344,0.012754352,0.011097465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009540393,0.00010218952,0.0016831476,0.000060438728,0.00003310384,0.00008605744,0.05734276,0.000031872456,0.000051609044,0.15654211,0.7828156,0.0002970838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02522269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23761466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8022923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007435377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025545512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398995537","doi":"10.7910/dvn/qtoiqf/w3rusn","title":"felm_loop.R","year":2019,"lang":"hu","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Legitimation; Replication (statistics); Political science; Law; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.03130742445592442,"score_gpt":0.2751374504407208,"score_spread":0.2438300259847964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398995537","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001854516,0.000009447351,0.00070819183,0.00004663989,0.010498331,0.0009577278,0.9755989,0.00010212977,0.012060126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001027474,0.004350175,0.0001406154,0.0009862201,0.0038719208,0.000023077997,0.94047886,0.00006428544,0.049982086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993927,0.000589846,0.00082375243,0.0015023727,0.00169848,0.0014585436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99478537,0.00035352894,0.0006395918,0.0033222158,0.00022706692,0.000672244],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013250082,0.00081471814,0.0011015127,0.00026198273,0.0011462658,0.0006973428,0.003438875,0.0012672008,0.2489319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040800395,0.00075547845,0.00048437115,0.000592476,0.016225392,0.0012292281,0.0009975317,0.0010264093,0.8705676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006130835,0.00025315402,0.000020930684,0.00018303559,0.00020077436,0.00016511291,0.0011343268,0.0000045926026,0.0000063007633,0.040490568,0.9571548,0.0003250825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010189108,0.0001253831,0.000007288073,0.00019490384,0.00045872811,0.000008560961,0.0016704554,0.00001795971,0.0000065392555,0.00081461243,0.99457604,0.0011006262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022504348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001376129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6216357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035199497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009760273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399614158","doi":"10.1080/02773945.2024.2343266","title":"Sex after Technology: The Rhetoric of Health Monitoring Apps and the Reversal of <i>Roe v. Wade</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rhetoric Society Quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.012019727073897465,"score_gpt":0.2716246617896202,"score_spread":0.2596049347157227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399614158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5737851,0.25203773,0.03278545,0.104496606,0.021549016,0.004722051,0.00011624687,0.0014905806,0.009017195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99466395,0.0025856567,0.00022787385,0.00007056688,0.0007553707,0.00005250981,6.5935996e-7,0.000017307724,0.0016260884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810743,0.00026290058,0.00043400464,0.000283429,0.00051377155,0.00039844494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887115,0.00046315236,0.00017257434,0.0003456881,0.00008284755,0.000064567925],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001812594,0.00015536945,0.00037257606,0.000038927887,0.0005512739,0.000073321426,0.0004056092,0.00019496483,0.000014634061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026145812,0.00008790417,0.00026728827,0.00089233776,0.007792423,0.00017381186,0.0000355864,0.00032366894,0.000006962177],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024874296,0.00006225627,0.0025306048,0.00024832026,0.0002627031,0.0000023326352,0.44957754,7.515691e-7,0.00011733322,0.48724848,0.00877197,0.051152833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003304331,0.001200197,0.0018219544,0.00091564,0.00042865938,0.000023033774,0.42375267,0.00049077335,0.00049445924,0.15410054,0.4124787,0.000989037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00052310363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031459796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42087886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015253146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002588768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399771523","doi":"10.32920/26052925.v1","title":"The Politics of Surveillance: Upholding the Privacy Rights of Racialized Peoples in the Digital Age","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; York University; Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Electronic surveillance; Political science; Internet privacy; Privacy rights; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Information privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.026777047038306287,"score_gpt":0.3110220715505712,"score_spread":0.2842450245122649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399771523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5572033,0.003426109,0.0003432811,0.007902064,0.0031076453,0.0018265592,0.00023115924,0.00011245295,0.4258474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922593,0.0008298489,0.000024044704,0.00004000036,0.0005442674,0.000024814752,0.000009975585,0.000011965798,0.00625577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973748,0.00052165566,0.00060519576,0.00027682178,0.00082273316,0.0003988392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624777,0.0026121205,0.0002793409,0.0007031322,0.00011408411,0.000043562068],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024569025,0.00019680423,0.00040775744,0.00006237381,0.00065950776,0.0005856903,0.00187724,0.00021694023,0.000048799036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006352557,0.00007576994,0.00030764742,0.00033040994,0.009407932,0.000058691377,0.00068299635,0.00047743882,0.0000088918605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006714999,0.000033979304,0.00073117745,0.000060264087,0.000045097688,0.0000049995388,0.060165863,0.000006596151,0.0000032666862,0.9373882,0.0012335611,0.0003203115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002023145,0.000015334765,0.0009819719,0.00014347056,0.00003176417,0.000001010981,0.014664079,0.000041375006,0.000058367295,0.87029684,0.11336427,0.00019921281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019090794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.435056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000750436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051342155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399771550","doi":"10.32920/26052925","title":"The Politics of Surveillance: Upholding the Privacy Rights of Racialized Peoples in the Digital Age","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; York University; Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Electronic surveillance; Political science; Privacy rights; Internet privacy; Sociology; Criminology; Computer security; Law; Information privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.026777047038306287,"score_gpt":0.3110220715505712,"score_spread":0.2842450245122649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399771550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5572033,0.003426109,0.0003432811,0.007902064,0.0031076453,0.0018265592,0.00023115924,0.00011245295,0.4258474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922593,0.0008298489,0.000024044704,0.00004000036,0.0005442674,0.000024814752,0.000009975585,0.000011965798,0.00625577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973748,0.00052165566,0.00060519576,0.00027682178,0.00082273316,0.0003988392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624777,0.0026121205,0.0002793409,0.0007031322,0.00011408411,0.000043562068],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024569025,0.00019680423,0.00040775744,0.00006237381,0.00065950776,0.0005856903,0.00187724,0.00021694023,0.000048799036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006352557,0.00007576994,0.00030764742,0.00033040994,0.009407932,0.000058691377,0.00068299635,0.00047743882,0.0000088918605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006714999,0.000033979304,0.00073117745,0.000060264087,0.000045097688,0.0000049995388,0.060165863,0.000006596151,0.0000032666862,0.9373882,0.0012335611,0.0003203115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002023145,0.000015334765,0.0009819719,0.00014347056,0.00003176417,0.000001010981,0.014664079,0.000041375006,0.000058367295,0.87029684,0.11336427,0.00019921281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019090794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.435056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000750436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051342155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401016224","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v55i1.75676","title":"Diversity and Exclusion: Confronting the Campus Free Speech Crisis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Free speech; Political science; Sociology; Linguistics; Criminology; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025009748494516548,"score_gpt":0.2909311027210279,"score_spread":0.26592135422651136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401016224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8042329,0.0030801808,0.00056901237,0.16427757,0.0061879177,0.00018895093,0.0000192664,0.000009550472,0.02143467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98617196,0.00019352086,0.0011614964,0.0009534474,0.0027729403,0.0000018987264,9.729548e-7,0.0000046072264,0.008739161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986335,0.00024820058,0.00019386775,0.00008590788,0.0006970088,0.00014151944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988724,0.00043910753,0.0002828996,0.000111523594,0.00019750951,0.000096564094],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001519805,0.00005495208,0.000108580236,0.00005361048,0.008151888,0.0000447318,0.00054647366,0.000025580524,0.0016184325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030104927,0.00003846597,0.0000785506,0.00018539291,0.0011895472,0.00022056435,0.0007710398,0.00023581783,0.0000022446384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002340957,0.00011870346,0.025610765,0.0000029292262,0.000042591942,0.000007502284,0.050934263,0.000014263152,0.00000931799,0.73386365,0.18860905,0.0007635803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035600088,0.000053353247,0.010009186,0.0000071887043,0.00005408522,0.000102201004,0.044015583,0.000005963075,0.0000109667435,0.21089718,0.73438185,0.000106464875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036416453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014735032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5457728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015080777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003786571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403030937","doi":"10.1515/9780776638355","title":"Driving the Fake Out of Public Administration","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Computer security; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04379993219521636,"score_gpt":0.24446933968129372,"score_spread":0.20066940748607737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403030937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006752389,0.000079156416,0.00123107,0.00018439206,0.0004172986,0.00031771074,0.000073734736,0.000041453433,0.9975877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051115416,0.000059442118,0.000053467083,0.000011899064,0.00015387005,4.2848737e-7,0.000028224187,0.000010638581,0.9485666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985054,0.00027342341,0.00017956534,0.00021463844,0.00062299625,0.00020396414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987667,0.00019113882,0.00046647983,0.00033353065,0.00015561805,0.00008648313],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000602668,0.00012356939,0.00025842313,0.000079185134,0.000786741,0.00003323668,0.0009973113,0.00020685252,0.0006095529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040313746,0.00011895721,0.00019306855,0.000016878654,0.0077549163,0.0001063957,0.00019390234,0.00026288722,0.0000029332275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004845411,0.000019508834,0.000037349317,0.000027712367,0.0000700888,0.000008747331,0.011369177,6.96646e-7,0.0000036533145,0.9629119,0.023919038,0.0016272847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016300101,0.00005054084,0.00001303333,0.000025939611,0.000085783526,3.108789e-7,0.0019857371,0.000003877179,0.000019259884,0.0036980265,0.99382573,0.00012877602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006436458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012148512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9699067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001627993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010537399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403058374","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4942006","title":"Getting Rid of the Riot Act","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Computer security; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.00862335489506106,"score_gpt":0.2675485647611254,"score_spread":0.2589252098660643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403058374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65139264,0.06269606,0.043045174,0.03682452,0.010781195,0.00069044903,0.000009969501,0.00032657085,0.19423345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860291,0.0024583538,0.00001516844,0.000052305095,0.0012564025,8.1638615e-7,1.5499303e-7,0.000009580108,0.010178146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797046,0.00015583255,0.00017656418,0.000102567355,0.0003822632,0.001212291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963963,0.000087185676,0.00007677009,0.000100192505,0.00004647124,0.000049735736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002514795,0.00006695069,0.00009625052,0.000041761483,0.0006116949,0.00010582697,0.0004128752,0.000060215792,0.000097978635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009152996,0.000039658396,0.00016631957,0.000261281,0.0016297017,0.00018118582,0.000025589055,0.0010637644,0.000023456138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002815455,0.000009889109,0.00041948343,0.0000036169818,0.00005433502,0.0000014994683,0.002839403,0.0000032641524,0.00023674077,0.97960955,0.0003138585,0.01650556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013834573,0.00005820053,0.00013330876,0.000057665256,0.00004230001,0.00005833524,0.0039919643,0.00004706939,0.00025381826,0.8705306,0.12458351,0.0001048917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022592107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030096667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33463645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005308617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035474317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62929916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403296171","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4948598","title":"\"Cell Phone Searches Incident to Arrest: Revisiting R v Fearon Ten Years Later\"&amp;nbsp;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Phone; Microbiology; Chemistry; Biology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019013809712661672,"score_gpt":0.2956167584829322,"score_spread":0.2766029487702705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403296171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92077565,0.022299174,0.022940462,0.012164867,0.0025034563,0.00053712045,0.000007727023,0.0003344592,0.018437063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569196,0.005960523,0.00020129659,0.00016283612,0.0034850547,0.0000052602145,0.0000027742713,0.00003474491,0.03322789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960445,0.00026202213,0.0002878752,0.0002942339,0.0007163894,0.0023949665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929327,0.00011471547,0.00007069161,0.00016033991,0.00007619556,0.00028478852],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044649527,0.00014827313,0.00019784877,0.00018201178,0.0006084666,0.00053857063,0.000476727,0.00011185408,0.00022738043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000116401825,0.00012677969,0.00015819164,0.00048909633,0.00072069647,0.00034058854,0.00007221831,0.0015337585,0.0010262403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064196654,0.00008276927,0.0024166007,0.000057943747,0.0002301447,0.00014099252,0.03719932,0.0000712547,0.0022565615,0.8431923,0.0088307625,0.10545719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005810781,0.00026860682,0.0007927316,0.00033596286,0.00009629976,0.0001521541,0.012280014,0.000051382027,0.00028763976,0.36699384,0.6174744,0.00068588374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006704179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035309126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60864365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016302876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002555424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407159046","doi":"10.5210/fm.v30i2.13671","title":"Abolish privacy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"First Monday","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.01187491971928648,"score_gpt":0.2856728639158387,"score_spread":0.2737979441965522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407159046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13927008,0.0015050696,0.011901532,0.03384322,0.00612923,0.0005724301,0.000024190167,0.00061524403,0.806139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90340257,0.0001849833,0.00020796552,0.0004475062,0.00043330892,0.000012443455,0.000003069273,0.0000052722125,0.09530289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992136,0.000043362063,0.00011634412,0.00016819815,0.00019433773,0.0002641828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994652,0.00008164183,0.000028872573,0.00029695407,0.000052750052,0.000074558804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023019948,0.000067191715,0.00010741625,0.000050368028,0.0006856666,0.00009595474,0.0005115837,0.0000929858,0.00069920137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023021155,0.000058365225,0.000059890415,0.0003098002,0.002501311,0.00015907215,0.00008248985,0.000080866346,0.00022887091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038054318,0.000037919883,0.004603048,0.000008781654,0.000012546339,0.0000038960648,0.06381713,0.0000018343893,0.0000055616024,0.7117762,0.21738666,0.002342634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016385216,0.0000052317564,0.0019767042,0.00001634051,0.000008048929,7.038888e-8,0.00022164993,0.0000091183265,0.000059808826,0.029493831,0.9679675,0.00007781089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053727446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001660805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7641325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005899476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013537667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9216185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407872008","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-82463-0_5","title":"US Education Culture Wars: The Right in a Democracy to Exposure to a Plurality of Views","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius gentium","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021077908195641037,"score_gpt":0.30684246250427205,"score_spread":0.285764554308631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407872008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009054863,0.0023345165,0.00053383084,0.008444385,0.0031459553,0.0020992183,0.00010018336,0.00004372187,0.9823927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021178184,0.00035048745,0.0003546279,0.0017566747,0.00078479084,0.00006839613,0.000030802632,0.0000162589,0.97545975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982811,0.000121994606,0.00045647335,0.0003917372,0.00046483503,0.00028382504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886364,0.000056410805,0.0001881643,0.0004987325,0.00024766583,0.00014538731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054900657,0.00022357759,0.00038798666,0.00013916458,0.0002921053,0.00007325729,0.0006823571,0.00033923396,0.0006318398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008720222,0.00014737106,0.0002054765,0.00019824623,0.0009480072,0.00009497884,0.0001048581,0.0002504789,0.00014426385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016964928,0.000061131206,0.00014385463,0.000053599648,0.00003301236,0.000002880239,0.024289781,0.0000027466835,0.000026473086,0.83489114,0.13577327,0.004705162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008777945,0.000033749657,0.00019013857,0.00022349249,0.000047388527,4.6003439e-7,0.00039309074,3.452752e-7,0.000030878506,0.071707286,0.92709804,0.00018733731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013191729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016383434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7913248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021767878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068360654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91423404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408092884","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1452","title":"Exploring the Intersectional and Spatial Implications of the Police Power to Search Dwellings Incident to Lawful Arrest: A Comment on R. v. Stairs","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stairs; Power (physics); Architectural engineering; Sociology; Geography; Engineering; Civil engineering; Physics","score_opus":0.09057996816577145,"score_gpt":0.3447645751527907,"score_spread":0.2541846069870192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408092884","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07450355,0.012205976,0.010383844,0.86242056,0.0039810757,0.0056965426,0.00015072396,0.00016981373,0.030487893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98414856,0.005080633,0.00002731136,0.010082259,0.0002732145,0.00016487204,0.0000015788969,0.000011461336,0.00021013527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986852,0.00020056595,0.00023690934,0.0002159291,0.00044338696,0.00021804305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920017,0.00021670008,0.00003151266,0.00030397382,0.00011753775,0.00013012406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009999317,0.00009578185,0.00015845502,0.000029550476,0.0004869721,0.00009206728,0.0003892844,0.00002109785,0.00013088116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052231255,0.000054133274,0.00009891181,0.00036442504,0.0010167175,0.00010940263,0.00014891048,0.0001510767,0.0000580404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055330606,0.000027079393,0.00009069478,0.00016913589,0.000024853007,3.3448913e-7,0.016394634,0.000009208978,0.000027726383,0.9690723,0.010887911,0.0032905957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034905792,0.000054478864,0.00053973583,0.0015790844,0.000030725387,0.0000011503713,0.0008401407,0.000004437995,0.00007097894,0.0014283719,0.9953325,0.000083524916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014971366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014690022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98444456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014642205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001119687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411080002","doi":"10.63315/cjnsoa.v42i1.2906","title":"AFTER THE INJUNCTION: THE ROLE OF THE COURTS IN POLICING INDIGENOUS RESISTANCE IN B.C.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of native studies","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Resistance (ecology); Political science; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.012759450927546118,"score_gpt":0.28448961148189955,"score_spread":0.27173016055435345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411080002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87957686,0.04904229,0.0000227333,0.030681489,0.001375662,0.00041123462,0.000013014291,0.000002006001,0.038874708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978299,0.0003476576,0.000003878358,0.0004253141,0.00013619981,0.000005431571,1.7453472e-8,0.0000020771497,0.0012495395],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902993,0.00030376867,0.00023109594,0.000053978616,0.00018401469,0.00019718854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991572,0.00029512533,0.00015254138,0.00008314869,0.0002734261,0.000038546223],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010278042,0.000056672274,0.00015201309,0.00014519536,0.00063933164,0.000022558073,0.00032267207,0.00002937188,0.0000078060775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004866203,0.000025940408,0.00005413213,0.00059277663,0.004772902,0.000081164835,0.000017718918,0.00022089433,2.7515298e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003346839,0.000010593459,0.17386967,0.0000068698487,0.00011878452,0.00001602727,0.6030911,0.000022099486,0.0000032282985,0.21980396,0.0017847397,0.0012394178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038504892,0.000032927914,0.32585374,0.00046024573,0.000038670743,0.000001802805,0.28173196,9.899843e-7,0.000084016276,0.2354535,0.15585874,0.00009835452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029896712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94072664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91082996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046640087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013226307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99793553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411731607","doi":"10.54014/zqx0-8arf","title":"The First Amendment on Trial: Hate Speech, Free Speech and College Campuses","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; First amendment; Political science; Commercial speech; Speech act; Law; Linguistics; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02162840906069124,"score_gpt":0.29637707713289607,"score_spread":0.2747486680722048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411731607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038757134,0.0009012664,0.000027504917,0.0065757753,0.010548985,0.0031546524,0.00014747208,0.00022746246,0.9396598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029029304,0.005734218,0.00012782622,0.0005196257,0.0012617295,0.0001407639,0.00011679739,0.00003078536,0.9630389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802476,0.00012765892,0.00034987368,0.00041899877,0.00068836176,0.000390332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984816,0.00066116895,0.0001888533,0.0004364803,0.00012423003,0.00010771513],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007053657,0.00025751026,0.0003415008,0.000093690425,0.002092171,0.00032878917,0.00064669666,0.0003549078,0.00028279237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028361424,0.00015886573,0.00013494614,0.00025037778,0.001655616,0.000089696405,0.000042019943,0.00022784818,0.000040348426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018393468,0.0000777379,0.000010169831,0.000034064287,0.00007647472,0.000013806383,0.0032947606,2.4978937e-7,0.0000014143435,0.8510541,0.1367823,0.0068156226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00527276,0.00018404191,0.000031393858,0.00013883215,0.00009583094,3.0252207e-7,0.013875442,0.000003024399,0.0004862902,0.056091666,0.92349637,0.00032404615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030403978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25350016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7949624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016116355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035598013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413465339","doi":"10.29173/mlj1390","title":"Proving Deprivation in Criminal Fraud: Has the Court in R. c. Landry Cast the Net Too Wide?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Net (polyhedron); Criminology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03551174348957167,"score_gpt":0.2756371328767645,"score_spread":0.24012538938719283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413465339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8722381,0.00075446075,0.007102401,0.049173106,0.0025259878,0.00068496563,0.0000030384956,0.000041124393,0.06747683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974768,0.000083321735,0.00006420921,0.0014334465,0.0006580082,0.00000938332,8.532525e-7,0.000005627227,0.00026834843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985219,0.00034954873,0.00029880184,0.0001273853,0.00036856334,0.00033376162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993207,0.00030816538,0.00010710583,0.00014760543,0.00007205073,0.000044403758],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018714028,0.00009282579,0.00012544249,0.00007126128,0.0017599761,0.00058329274,0.00051217177,0.00008306886,0.000061544575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017467902,0.000052641157,0.000053342945,0.00029644926,0.002272326,0.00030267372,0.00005694749,0.0005278632,0.000010727823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005237623,0.000103244645,0.13849191,0.00001245666,0.000023590594,0.00011303072,0.022833355,0.00017370826,0.0000216284,0.80610734,0.011139678,0.020927679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015676423,0.00006905327,0.1349604,0.0002637675,0.00007263072,0.00006353942,0.17134733,0.0005661354,0.000078095014,0.16851501,0.52215713,0.00033925593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037090972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7643038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72721285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023632609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022827338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413496929","doi":"10.64628/aam.dsryp7wfd","title":"Campus tensions and the Mideast crisis: Will Ontario and Alberta’s ‘Chicago Principles’ on university free expression stand?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Political science; Public administration; Management; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.02286891759636104,"score_gpt":0.23368233916888606,"score_spread":0.21081342157252503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413496929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7340468,0.000117637916,0.00041763374,0.042516105,0.00052315777,0.0006273248,0.000022940954,0.00020756952,0.22152081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88212544,0.00084102346,0.00008959375,0.0004147875,0.00008743,0.0000019162273,0.0000033667097,0.00000776054,0.116428666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895966,0.00016785816,0.00009473642,0.00025465805,0.00027411044,0.00024897727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990719,0.00039983087,0.000044141496,0.00026007983,0.00005899238,0.0001650461],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043269215,0.00009568378,0.00014294441,0.00004865899,0.0013336048,0.000069739646,0.00022421712,0.00009520716,0.00021692798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001457506,0.000054993492,0.00003931998,0.00018446377,0.0034060937,0.00019002,0.00019560404,0.00013663375,0.000016680613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113182374,0.000023308157,0.002675453,0.0000030538217,0.00001784633,0.000013395687,0.035565637,0.000005171803,0.000016269238,0.9280952,0.033227243,0.00024421836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018384961,0.00004897792,0.010373768,0.000037964233,0.00003828494,0.0000016457643,0.031649996,0.000056667108,0.000023779274,0.03123585,0.9244953,0.00019929705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11230314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6467456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89685935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065567845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016017605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413512407","doi":"10.64628/aam.jky334d4s","title":"As Joe Biden becomes president, here’s an easy proposal for Electoral College reform","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.029718216822465816,"score_gpt":0.3257637354787722,"score_spread":0.29604551865630635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413512407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19755743,0.0008072052,0.005471187,0.024410766,0.0037211045,0.0031479814,0.00015996299,0.0009855313,0.7637388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5894,0.00005491078,0.0040096478,0.0005431251,0.0014311915,0.00008022483,0.000034954002,0.000028903425,0.40441704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984666,0.00012438434,0.00021423031,0.0003218017,0.00039643745,0.00047650965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915355,0.000067615336,0.0000599229,0.0002389502,0.00024952446,0.00023044756],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004234294,0.000120150515,0.00020338548,0.000038755366,0.00066981424,0.00018974346,0.00032400995,0.00013993603,0.0017066206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012324564,0.00009038716,0.0001158318,0.00025223804,0.0014650874,0.00059201976,0.00004693006,0.000076425946,0.00009874698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025633126,0.000093238974,0.0023447336,0.000011484701,0.000027705886,0.000016137401,0.0012974506,2.697697e-7,0.00014894859,0.9863371,0.009235933,0.00046136018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014151322,0.00045700226,0.0013234904,0.000022199343,0.000060527575,0.0000121041585,0.014116904,0.00008439797,0.007755961,0.44429442,0.52987266,0.00058518234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007326902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15962113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5420427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023287328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014824306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413603406","doi":"10.64628/aam.ducuqvu4u","title":"Even after an indictment on federal charges, ‘persecuted’ Donald Trump could win again","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Indictment; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.060560573939399606,"score_gpt":0.32676001636898194,"score_spread":0.2661994424295823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413603406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5469647,0.0008723103,0.004779165,0.09194307,0.026647924,0.008020737,0.0019254634,0.0045668436,0.31427976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8926676,0.00065568835,0.00043464135,0.0050285696,0.0034440442,0.0004265811,0.00047747316,0.000095269956,0.09677012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961924,0.0003920984,0.0004300124,0.0009572082,0.0012417176,0.000786592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855655,0.00010442294,0.0001746625,0.00064811745,0.00008737415,0.0004288974],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010826669,0.00041939213,0.00049369567,0.00019246896,0.0006415603,0.0004697851,0.00084662484,0.00084466836,0.002996346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037245383,0.00033640524,0.0002955222,0.00018319138,0.002603321,0.00017660316,0.00033027734,0.00076934765,0.0009263813],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034257973,0.0010565883,0.007248477,0.00012903153,0.00077386555,0.00034407154,0.10418339,0.00014140255,0.00003479254,0.75510526,0.12633392,0.0043066335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021558444,0.0007090805,0.018647527,0.00059883134,0.00024017139,0.000002591062,0.01466316,0.00049286085,0.00019039163,0.23750699,0.7215025,0.0032900865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072635952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018783875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59516853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005108724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059259945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413675063","doi":"10.64628/aam.ftee4rahp","title":"Protecting free speech on campus: A solution in search of a problem","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Computer science; Speech recognition; Political science","score_opus":0.051048122397204215,"score_gpt":0.323716645129878,"score_spread":0.27266852273267383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413675063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26937276,0.0000928833,0.039043505,0.0036219433,0.0014172574,0.007076664,0.00003304292,0.00034180854,0.67900014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820769,0.000043119348,0.010133688,0.00003401399,0.00092482375,0.00011553918,0.0000057196808,0.00001968367,0.006646526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976239,0.0004496576,0.0003523457,0.0004408518,0.00070283934,0.00043038756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896985,0.00011452899,0.00017355288,0.0004456921,0.0002201252,0.00007624373],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003142212,0.00014831335,0.0002892845,0.00019219566,0.00028437606,0.000066417386,0.00066779426,0.00045988147,0.00030582063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034645406,0.000120363286,0.00009805006,0.0002686214,0.0041036946,0.000078439974,0.00046072758,0.000687243,0.00004160082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015899763,0.00074664614,0.005952248,0.0009455484,0.00009622778,0.00002259788,0.13289982,0.00017350378,0.00060011167,0.82495797,0.004798523,0.028647821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017865619,0.0006502379,0.0007602518,0.0023308047,0.000039469556,0.000002565622,0.0109078735,0.001811996,0.009306622,0.96202683,0.0092137195,0.001163052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03829547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04121924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7127041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003104717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061708264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413724505","doi":"10.64628/aam.necca63ww","title":"Trump may have emboldened hate in Canada, but it was already here","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04568756184347247,"score_gpt":0.2991527681941784,"score_spread":0.25346520635070596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413724505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07772881,0.00037060448,0.00043382208,0.01804627,0.00524296,0.0010560516,0.00016921383,0.000112755515,0.8968395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.771172,0.00045865308,0.00012406356,0.0005135215,0.0006842935,0.000033623484,0.00003363653,0.000023963528,0.22695628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970124,0.00023407594,0.00044193395,0.00068817835,0.0008478362,0.00077561196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998185,0.000115647286,0.00030230166,0.00093890575,0.0001260569,0.0003321102],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074953755,0.00032862136,0.0006314417,0.00008047086,0.000678493,0.00040345461,0.0015973282,0.00052050606,0.0019703435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001302931,0.00027222701,0.00014628029,0.000048387934,0.0031805355,0.00017498025,0.00044538465,0.0005625151,0.0001106276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073326,0.00019494929,0.08061011,0.00023746093,0.00031435082,0.0009299953,0.03152822,0.00024944812,0.00001683022,0.6617575,0.20759234,0.016495446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021688712,0.00005258863,0.014320733,0.0007328774,0.00016174023,0.000005683558,0.053093426,0.00069894845,0.0006337017,0.16291837,0.76199913,0.003213907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99771357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6934432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012868154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006792977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414662811","doi":"10.1163/9789004322714_cclc_2021-0063-257","title":"Protecting Manitobans Advancing Manitoba Speech","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Climate Change and Law Collection","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.04661958380561915,"score_gpt":0.29723675257796556,"score_spread":0.2506171687723464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414662811","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029280822,0.0015820579,0.00015822845,0.00082305004,0.008145235,0.0037841876,0.9520903,0.0003886388,0.03273545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00047952184,0.043341015,0.00020630455,0.001688568,0.013987657,0.0012519334,0.93296605,0.000054365482,0.0060245832],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980477,0.00025448602,0.00027534273,0.00048562177,0.00031903185,0.0006178112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991569,0.0001366335,0.00020220711,0.00025550026,0.00012785028,0.00012093789],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007800284,0.0002659347,0.0003595758,0.000201893,0.004267133,0.0003099979,0.00021528696,0.00049551006,0.00013478905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009781344,0.00026183968,0.00009130296,0.0005660645,0.0016017444,0.00032371964,0.00012022484,0.00047370652,0.0000149904545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024348334,0.000055498444,0.00002041671,0.00050375465,0.000029295383,0.00003332595,0.001612238,8.2865114e-8,0.0000046887417,0.014540435,0.98069966,0.0024762603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002499116,0.00007973495,0.0000037871016,0.0003761431,0.00010553922,0.000008066507,0.003911624,0.0000058092673,0.000025862495,0.0012571851,0.9936669,0.000309422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031952918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37782556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34587264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003949335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000092828814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415244180","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.4103","title":"The Law of Racial Profiling","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racial profiling; Profiling (computer programming); Charter; Racism; CLARITY; Adversarial system; Harm","score_opus":0.015172204839074131,"score_gpt":0.3001060235199659,"score_spread":0.2849338186808918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415244180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006494743,0.00083133706,0.0040745963,0.0023404213,0.0015224626,0.000116927826,0.0000026912392,0.000023294444,0.9904388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99413127,0.0002728282,0.00047053312,0.00024957472,0.0007904858,0.0000027631677,4.854198e-7,0.0000058178707,0.004076221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864495,0.00022434468,0.00030222553,0.00010343281,0.0003993866,0.0003256837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992258,0.00019867017,0.0001557359,0.00013984228,0.00018624756,0.00009373542],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014000088,0.00007785456,0.00014822725,0.0000226842,0.0032021857,0.00022502984,0.00047049034,0.000092492824,0.0000774632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008543431,0.000049504717,0.00013192401,0.0001500203,0.0065055685,0.00021243507,0.00004054948,0.00027656517,0.000012199649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021693333,0.000028673645,0.0001586174,0.000004544944,0.000033428532,0.000005368665,0.0014177242,0.000005259479,0.0001518072,0.9958609,0.00043966045,0.0018723604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003514596,0.00002511679,0.000017935912,0.00004400981,0.000029622337,0.000004613548,0.0017735692,0.000016714783,0.0015676193,0.7390435,0.2570444,0.000081456055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072939126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1395919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9934818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006174985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020716483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415244188","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.4102","title":"Doing Away with Racial Profiling in Policing Without Doing Away with the Rule of Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Racial profiling; Habeas corpus; Profiling (computer programming); Judicial review; Appeal; Remedial education; Human rights","score_opus":0.010888310416521853,"score_gpt":0.2799812471651342,"score_spread":0.26909293674861234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415244188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047237568,0.00026446173,0.023249121,0.00228083,0.0003455589,0.00040294332,0.0000036948868,0.00005140048,0.92616445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99216455,0.000040558854,0.0059644575,0.00046319244,0.00058702024,0.000008555715,9.672208e-7,0.00002244656,0.00074825104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977187,0.0003068472,0.000420517,0.00025005496,0.00067417504,0.0006296867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893117,0.00018694701,0.00032986264,0.00021737498,0.00019865183,0.00013599684],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016363676,0.00020246743,0.0003831032,0.00011146144,0.0020780046,0.00030987672,0.00049794937,0.00012187539,0.000034492037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021214842,0.00011668614,0.00009270908,0.00044729543,0.0042015635,0.0005427573,0.00005712966,0.00064186874,0.0000032708417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013564217,0.000056360597,0.0073331166,0.000024960415,0.00006279059,0.0000307507,0.013194928,0.00049583754,0.00046075822,0.9773751,0.000014866614,0.0008149214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.033067662,0.0021754757,0.0039075315,0.014666008,0.0016211396,0.00087284896,0.10739162,0.0016995119,0.05503576,0.35723022,0.41724926,0.005082964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054775193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4906558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.944927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017358277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004564384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415570594","doi":"10.1017/beq.2025.10085","title":"The Danger of Contextual Integrity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business Ethics Quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Yale University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Adversarial system; Sociality; Data integrity; Contextual design; Context analysis; Personal Integrity","score_opus":0.057513871347640806,"score_gpt":0.3485667971884821,"score_spread":0.2910529258408413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415570594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056973748,0.0034903134,0.31405038,0.21891291,0.013566672,0.0014724591,0.000058281843,0.00043602983,0.3910392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886673,0.00017199782,0.00008169076,0.00050248514,0.00025023601,0.0000133908015,0.0000027675585,0.0000058575306,0.010304284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985395,0.0003870792,0.0002570732,0.00015763036,0.0004157389,0.00024295294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711114,0.0015300263,0.00009820889,0.00027995987,0.00093887805,0.00004177077],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022285527,0.000088559245,0.00016544937,0.00004488178,0.0009923897,0.00012284938,0.0004894578,0.00030485188,0.00003487586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00078377686,0.000057567868,0.00006446054,0.0005092339,0.013477573,0.000150522,0.000017745351,0.00055879855,0.000017960456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016411703,0.000032433996,0.0001820402,0.000023218256,0.000017085607,9.92401e-7,0.028431788,1.7936884e-7,0.0000399691,0.94648725,0.00214538,0.022623228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047938048,0.000057717334,0.0031357282,0.00013253902,0.00003749234,4.174525e-7,0.029920137,0.000022993696,0.00006035342,0.32890713,0.6370622,0.0001839447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034953984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012554096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93169355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039003822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082701206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98920715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415814509","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5695862","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause in Context: Purposive Interpretation and Section 33's Place in the Constitution's Structure","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Charter; Section (typography); Judicial interpretation; Statutory interpretation","score_opus":0.007493425341817342,"score_gpt":0.27346859612305563,"score_spread":0.2659751707812383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415814509","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70271885,0.0450719,0.17607555,0.028243335,0.014233318,0.0072909715,0.00013018823,0.00013381592,0.02610204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868885,0.011817726,0.000008464216,0.00011676512,0.00048136702,0.000024906833,0.000005177467,0.0000046358386,0.0006524431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724156,0.0008120128,0.00034221745,0.00024517492,0.00035706817,0.0010019729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898493,0.0004290081,0.00027585364,0.00014635536,0.00012625373,0.000037580936],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034855222,0.00017066897,0.00020817292,0.00016401152,0.0011154175,0.00046596696,0.0004789857,0.00029551942,0.0000058699407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032505853,0.000103109516,0.000066065295,0.00029900842,0.0025803407,0.00022151216,0.00007494088,0.004105106,5.0581093e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108724984,0.000010936038,0.0013448562,0.000007646943,0.00006145164,0.0000039177576,0.027480243,0.0002944304,0.000006306944,0.962238,0.000059123053,0.008384333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088602846,0.0000782734,0.00029915373,0.00031878162,0.00007353502,0.00007795354,0.09401594,0.00046268705,0.000008705084,0.88695997,0.016584892,0.00023408646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014562538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33079344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3293372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024053545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049275807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417350212","doi":"10.24908/ss.v23i4.19989","title":"Review of Collier’s Tor: From the Dark Web to the Future of Privacy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Deep Web; Information privacy; The Internet; Privacy software; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.012008871972345696,"score_gpt":0.28888133762349666,"score_spread":0.276872465651151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417350212","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050847042,0.64653826,0.0027489266,0.21959987,0.007634546,0.0038242848,0.0013288504,0.0001880224,0.06729017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6706397,0.30711898,0.000539615,0.016605299,0.0019571288,0.000053160355,0.000027430502,0.00001622333,0.0030424816],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985077,0.000374979,0.0003031765,0.00019975122,0.00038790712,0.000226525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845827,0.0005341843,0.00016245607,0.00056951254,0.00023063122,0.00004493908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001952711,0.00010342198,0.0003164294,0.000004640288,0.0004433584,0.000024620254,0.00090892107,0.00009182575,0.00014256692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022607754,0.000054728636,0.00031046645,0.0006761972,0.0025116182,0.00004887817,0.000117289084,0.00013574206,0.000008981969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007716006,0.000029299004,0.012635591,0.00023265839,0.00008352072,9.966077e-8,0.020892607,0.0000010843764,0.000056530862,0.06567986,0.8956263,0.0047547026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001307596,0.000009325373,0.0054809423,0.00040021024,0.000015714639,2.9888355e-8,0.0050345603,0.0000027226297,0.000019402058,0.0025184657,0.9863135,0.000074348194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007083259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044358256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61979264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072288814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045105035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9254162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W567409246","doi":"10.5860/choice.40-0365","title":"Sexual violence: policies, practices, and challenges in the United States and Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Law enforcement; Sexual violence; Law; Politics; Sex offense; Sociology; History; Poison control; Political science; Suicide prevention; Sexual abuse; Medicine","score_opus":0.16218591446722658,"score_gpt":0.3561586997174577,"score_spread":0.19397278525023115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W567409246","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30413207,0.64835185,0.0000049240493,0.04549455,0.00013614772,0.00061464414,0.000046804813,0.000021599859,0.0011974107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014484383,0.9828776,0.000058269397,0.001801495,0.00041723993,0.000012835341,0.000024718884,0.0000057304046,0.00031770935],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985866,0.0004926241,0.00023358835,0.00019783973,0.00023092487,0.00025840415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887675,0.00059331075,0.00021049558,0.00017891565,0.00004053427,0.00009996562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009527359,0.000111262365,0.00022494291,0.000041037434,0.00026238064,0.000060480757,0.00022582259,0.000053844808,0.00003801246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008587074,0.00006736731,0.000011668274,0.00026079104,0.0014175009,0.00016582101,0.00002745195,0.0001689513,0.0000022660356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065214876,0.0004764503,0.019131308,0.0009657921,0.000036609843,0.00003626808,0.053941038,0.0000028388756,0.00000730638,0.055510215,0.020270484,0.84961516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013656165,0.000024655972,0.0017407581,0.0001338627,0.000017216267,0.000004031946,0.010105616,0.00008228929,1.7338178e-7,0.00021608827,0.98743623,0.00010249255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8221317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9848512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96716577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005286052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008159604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5222841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W569468412","doi":"10.5860/choice.44-1186","title":"The First Amendment in cross-cultural perspective: a comparative legal analysis of the freedom of speech","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Choice Reviews Online","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Constitution; Assertion; Law; First amendment; Sociology; Political science; Context (archaeology); Constitutional law; Supreme court; History; Politics","score_opus":0.05204581979797503,"score_gpt":0.40317542479617197,"score_spread":0.35112960499819695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W569468412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95859027,0.024945358,0.000066901346,0.0031579009,0.00034213095,0.00173425,0.000112655915,0.000016964163,0.011033594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99479073,0.0027319973,0.00011190504,0.000035186767,0.00041854763,0.000023521912,0.000010745559,0.000004414971,0.0018729372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809754,0.00036154676,0.0006685238,0.00022145933,0.00041930575,0.00023165169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849176,0.0002808941,0.00047079517,0.00037345663,0.00034968398,0.0000333927],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010314939,0.0001341853,0.0006354291,0.000061793035,0.00042875813,0.00007332025,0.0006146493,0.000049595445,0.00005819154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002766219,0.00006292051,0.00039394695,0.0017106961,0.0063372105,0.00018545616,0.00005943263,0.00015420136,0.0000034968891],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060082824,0.0026798383,0.36318615,0.00010398366,0.00077185896,0.000004285255,0.040520225,0.0011300711,0.00024876476,0.58501595,0.003395203,0.0028835838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007106791,0.00006853448,0.14901356,0.00014323037,0.0005911328,3.557863e-7,0.01095037,0.00030760758,0.000084112035,0.00083477556,0.837095,0.00020058748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028550515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.41137385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8336998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022212879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007942019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W578120660","doi":"10.59962/9780774856003","title":"Judicial Decision Making in Child Sexual Abuse Cases","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Child sexual abuse; Index (typography); Criminology; Sexual abuse; Psychology; Child abuse; Law; Political science; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Computer science; Poison control; Medical emergency; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.020677562806436317,"score_gpt":0.22097294913419668,"score_spread":0.20029538632776037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W578120660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015940962,0.0005137219,0.00028501422,0.0000036561169,0.00052047725,0.0006536066,0.00046351744,0.00010872529,0.98151034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038426623,0.001231006,0.00026545738,0.000036460202,0.0005233095,6.4759354e-7,0.000028215114,0.000033510158,0.9594548],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978314,0.00015396797,0.00028596853,0.0005316983,0.0007616858,0.00043527115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988168,0.00027255766,0.00029753952,0.00028277334,0.00018578734,0.00014456274],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024628002,0.00014646466,0.0005555821,0.00010786253,0.0009571134,0.00015963167,0.0007769206,0.0006410365,0.000207014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005155117,0.00034288943,0.00016995199,0.000039618873,0.0093271695,0.0001832447,0.0001776212,0.00044364427,0.000007073817],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024948295,0.00032546677,0.0009551825,0.00020570266,0.0002293492,0.024226252,0.05374613,0.000016923148,8.3484184e-7,0.029768823,0.6824885,0.20778738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011895836,0.000093050236,0.0004626863,0.0016568482,0.000092310715,0.00015598712,0.0014192541,0.00000765549,1.6973115e-7,0.0029837848,0.9913841,0.00055458763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40611884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91002077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5039019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003930781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006427848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W657512810","doi":"","title":"Surveillance : power, problems, and politics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Politics; Political science; Criminalization; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.019083328730072804,"score_gpt":0.25652847463218864,"score_spread":0.23744514590211585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W657512810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008018647,0.001632939,0.00040235496,0.00088225526,0.00027967966,0.00026229804,0.000018406188,0.00013453286,0.9963795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010974873,0.0018636244,0.00012354966,0.00046763764,0.00088050996,0.000002025051,0.00002010601,0.000015982754,0.99552906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986873,0.00006620731,0.0001927297,0.0002815032,0.000374065,0.00039814154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930805,0.00011118768,0.00009002424,0.0001959984,0.00010079126,0.00019394018],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037875597,0.00017206105,0.00028639392,0.000049603233,0.000373857,0.00011840338,0.00023501768,0.0003861446,0.00060500635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036995243,0.000139497,0.00006186864,0.000046207075,0.0065844664,0.00008076364,0.000029787334,0.00017487048,0.00008139739],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.0858188e-7,0.000008349127,0.00003874905,0.000010563475,0.000008536533,0.000003412289,0.0011240174,5.3764033e-8,1.1293258e-7,0.8272589,0.17098302,0.0005639204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076629505,0.000027720922,0.000026583335,0.000019234703,0.0000049104924,7.5351363e-7,0.000039902625,4.4472725e-7,1.9479796e-7,0.26425046,0.7353756,0.00017754821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037968124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025287943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5643926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013735359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000539476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W658463699","doi":"","title":"Rites of Privacy and the Privacy Trade: On the Limits of Protection for the Self by Elizabeth Neill (review)","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Privacy protection; Information privacy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.02546002310361884,"score_gpt":0.23027414491516282,"score_spread":0.204814121811544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W658463699","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2988482,0.23009475,0.042991534,0.3020786,0.0017580038,0.033190966,0.0005894615,0.0004116209,0.09003683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853333,0.012837205,0.00015115103,0.00012613235,0.00006516228,0.000002952193,0.0000010861545,0.0000055803976,0.0014773776],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916065,0.00023443808,0.00013007996,0.000118234566,0.00023106484,0.00012551747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989632,0.00048166845,0.00021642806,0.00023588065,0.000072429284,0.000030424535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054935174,0.00007562421,0.0001887413,0.000007501986,0.0004486069,0.000008642531,0.00046109522,0.00005424474,0.00014386787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056724584,0.000040689476,0.00012069131,0.00004874434,0.0026649798,0.0001876086,0.000011735071,0.000057411875,9.1400926e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026401973,0.00048479627,0.00010008648,0.0003815555,0.00029228648,4.5750437e-7,0.4220769,9.788388e-7,0.00039526576,0.395753,0.06692401,0.11332663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003931213,0.002180058,0.0014814897,0.0004100642,0.00051807263,0.0000011745881,0.047744177,0.00117284,0.000334424,0.0041806367,0.93774295,0.0003029011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005380001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019508343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8708189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047801124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021144077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9819229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6888426135","doi":"10.20381/ruor-29229","title":"Truly Equal? An Analysis of Whether Canada’s Political Finance System Fulfills the Egalitarian Model","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Politics; Supreme court; Nomination; Charter; Primary election; General election","score_opus":0.08641073372107427,"score_gpt":0.33848288177713315,"score_spread":0.2520721480560589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6888426135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.624044,0.000040736624,0.014953917,0.024612363,0.00024482494,0.0007861013,0.00083479035,0.00014538364,0.33433786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98316765,0.000021471573,0.00010854396,0.000016083206,0.00004354671,4.2765885e-7,0.000013438748,0.0000057738794,0.016623067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967271,0.00078493316,0.00013928191,0.00025493038,0.0014320358,0.0006617183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831825,0.00043739064,0.00006821578,0.00044994184,0.00049504545,0.00023115418],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029177715,0.00007221297,0.00027946685,0.00038400694,0.0010852057,0.00002526515,0.0010576874,0.00010400657,0.00013984505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015244665,0.000062834384,0.00014017295,0.0020709422,0.0064576943,0.00022641035,0.00012581567,0.00019471007,0.0000137972365],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000431731,0.000026826032,0.002814196,0.000019314413,0.00013205907,0.000020521678,0.0064582163,0.00097199704,0.000020562782,0.9858167,0.0035658537,0.00014941186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001024613,0.00023563359,0.037622757,0.00007933486,0.0005484776,7.864569e-7,0.4075898,0.38556802,0.0000733715,0.028096976,0.13861902,0.0005412123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6926135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94149196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95771974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045201904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017522722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99624616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6902881909","doi":"10.7916/d8-y9y8-hc33","title":"Article by Ralph McGill on Gunnar Myrdal from the Atlanta Constitution; enclosed with May 27, 1939 letter from Howard W. Odum to Frederick P. Keppel","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Atlanta; George (robot)","score_opus":0.015512075455649574,"score_gpt":0.21099762250314966,"score_spread":0.1954855470475001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6902881909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92601955,0.00008382313,0.0003374562,0.011854475,0.0008598909,0.0014005031,0.0011874464,0.00028101134,0.05797583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9232521,0.000134401,0.0001220945,0.004021615,0.00041514818,0.0000060773073,0.00008103869,0.000030808616,0.071936734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965241,0.00057941384,0.00032657248,0.00089023134,0.00080182654,0.0008778305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975,0.00078515906,0.00022085817,0.0008436851,0.00013710665,0.00051316124],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035660385,0.00027381096,0.0004906946,0.00007979203,0.0020631906,0.0003393428,0.0017868622,0.0004848554,0.0023234873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009423907,0.00032997917,0.00017491265,0.0010242438,0.0045425766,0.00055671384,0.00034870466,0.0010041184,0.0008965864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016870935,0.00012673369,0.2548586,0.000003636445,0.00014594715,0.000057421097,0.001904706,0.000017976055,0.0011251217,0.01505669,0.72592735,0.000607081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019786544,0.00015742211,0.01725151,0.00010587875,0.00014410743,0.0000015291799,0.002699143,0.000036452995,0.00011545459,0.0014201613,0.9754969,0.0005928027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24778257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34132555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2495695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006075998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029217495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6949359677","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.14293055","title":"Corymbitodes Buysson 1904","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genus; Checklist; Taxonomy (biology); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.045199369762104376,"score_gpt":0.2668116834176679,"score_spread":0.22161231365556355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6949359677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014615155,0.00020230688,0.007429003,0.0036062463,0.0007358612,0.0006559221,0.00025712574,0.001782957,0.9707154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97685677,0.00010880724,0.000090686925,0.00032441373,0.00048299643,8.8483226e-8,0.000485028,0.0007478375,0.020903388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976544,0.0007795623,0.00016337103,0.00030618583,0.00068741414,0.00040909345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991735,0.000030878524,0.000077963436,0.00028682526,0.0002472462,0.00018356493],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012749172,0.00008637767,0.00010600347,0.00013295299,0.011529052,0.00058299094,0.0011749822,0.00003795379,0.07699209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034404645,0.00009448576,0.000054820885,0.0006096947,0.0023895274,0.00023225599,0.000939552,0.00026162894,0.0042901705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033800083,0.00013692972,0.0000071004556,0.000009525288,0.000019641398,0.000016795606,0.012048396,0.000037852707,0.00044914513,0.5607282,0.38277704,0.043735594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026772072,0.000121938996,0.00004405981,0.0000033621131,0.0000070066703,0.000014418063,0.0036209875,0.000048072932,0.00005078206,0.0023785946,0.99331015,0.0001328784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012471016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027636065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9622416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029461537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000104378005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6949599065","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.2532501","title":"EmbeddedMultisensorSystems/EMS-SymAHRS v20.0","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Context (archaeology); Table (database); Relation (database)","score_opus":0.0391565191657944,"score_gpt":0.27434664655888197,"score_spread":0.23519012739308756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6949599065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000019853745,0.00033431445,0.0022699179,0.00038834446,0.00091707514,0.0010119898,0.00039444305,0.0021526928,0.9925114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048612934,0.00066076935,0.00010928592,0.00010489101,0.001808258,5.8754612e-8,0.00092294056,0.008157947,0.98337454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966462,0.00085933576,0.00030212695,0.00065006886,0.00087714917,0.0006651031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982514,0.000037918584,0.00027640918,0.0007541753,0.00036164044,0.00031847158],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009004267,0.00026642697,0.00035728843,0.00038870363,0.0023843849,0.0010212682,0.0017190987,0.00038609628,0.07801523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046734745,0.0002667706,0.00012540843,0.0005225091,0.0034736153,0.00016357498,0.00057937705,0.0003822954,0.09074161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010598212,0.000054835364,0.0000011050886,0.000088781664,0.000059844988,0.0000128423535,0.0026793554,0.000002040619,0.00004198698,0.12652208,0.86118877,0.009337764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042365593,0.00006970878,0.0000046385076,0.00012901849,0.000024576153,0.000012452352,0.0010582061,0.00001632718,0.000007881963,0.00015484949,0.997748,0.0003506909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005540347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001976739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13655923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026582688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018443008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6974023734","doi":"10.57912/23766387","title":"Fox News Dodges a Possible Bullet in Recent Dominion Settlement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American University Research Archive","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dominion; Voting; Settlement (finance); Supreme court; Presidential election; Presidential system","score_opus":0.05894689675441166,"score_gpt":0.35531551739488587,"score_spread":0.2963686206404742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6974023734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42290667,0.000118525364,0.004048328,0.058742967,0.00054940244,0.0025750403,0.0006942726,0.0005765952,0.5097882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94965804,0.020184329,0.0014063604,0.00028938465,0.00039224944,0.000011767558,0.00020702826,0.000032452204,0.0278184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964482,0.0013050151,0.00011722417,0.0003835681,0.0008335298,0.00091242907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857277,0.0007304425,0.00005430048,0.0002540149,0.00012043663,0.00026804634],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014336245,0.00009434225,0.00019110968,0.0007065479,0.0009294357,0.000060165556,0.0006379226,0.000033916127,0.00033293673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021846367,0.00009536296,0.000065147586,0.0027140968,0.013793597,0.00016005916,0.00036341572,0.0003531613,0.00050800253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007197938,0.00034578476,0.0485609,0.000018250223,0.00008792975,0.00073927856,0.10078728,0.000048145743,0.00043242087,0.48182282,0.22037701,0.14606038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006474113,0.00024648308,0.006095995,0.000022206983,0.0000038220505,4.1143522e-7,0.09347955,0.00006055543,0.000026150745,0.011332407,0.8879285,0.00015653722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035474416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033326305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66755146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043374696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005512638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981288324","doi":"","title":"Does composition matter? Wage inequality and the demographic and educational structure of the labor force in Gemany","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Econstor (Econstor)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wage; Educational attainment; Wage inequality; Quarter (Canadian coin); German; Inequality; Panel data; Efficiency wage","score_opus":0.005191960881716531,"score_gpt":0.23178678542489137,"score_spread":0.22659482454317484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981288324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9186286,0.002444336,0.00008035152,0.005125031,0.0029779575,0.0011764197,0.0004921412,0.00006235996,0.06901281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637404,0.0003403667,0.00009234855,0.0006098687,0.0007781969,0.000020675185,0.000014359272,0.00007064753,0.03433312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982873,0.00058666704,0.0003418852,0.00032666518,0.00022709371,0.00023039553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867195,0.0004366289,0.0004372915,0.00033567104,0.000043305867,0.000075167685],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057120534,0.00021476446,0.00042914873,0.00014723379,0.00028739005,0.000066498214,0.0003416596,0.00030975576,0.0014889874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005096407,0.000107231775,0.00009575672,0.00016521067,0.015601048,0.00008957512,0.000068334506,0.00025685944,0.0000067593764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012077915,0.000020742293,0.685231,0.0000768165,0.000045869474,2.0519825e-7,0.0020506966,2.09678e-7,0.000021110178,0.29934922,0.0131273875,0.00006468313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031560306,0.000029734176,0.71655124,0.0007471854,0.0002199373,0.000016886512,0.0015151862,0.000018174362,0.000037519,0.105075434,0.17172681,0.00090586045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015241702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023586404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19427377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052110565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019922998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981656660","doi":"","title":"Eutrofiering av Mjøsa - kartlegging av årsaksforhold og kilder til fosfor i ni delnedbørfelt","year":2021,"lang":"no","type":"report","venue":"Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christian ministry; Quarter (Canadian coin); Population","score_opus":0.08018229420993662,"score_gpt":0.32182337470812544,"score_spread":0.24164108049818883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981656660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040934063,0.0061730472,0.07406727,0.0058899294,0.0048906566,0.004194167,0.002193596,0.00042410093,0.8612332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2980328,0.07243702,0.010113977,0.00017689799,0.0061948663,0.00002152127,0.0020224713,0.000412937,0.61058754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855443,0.0024769711,0.00080584595,0.0020969124,0.0059061227,0.0031698314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99181765,0.0019999908,0.00077503495,0.0015829559,0.0023161802,0.0015081846],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069852686,0.0007934218,0.0017717622,0.0016938912,0.0057599857,0.0003849186,0.003386018,0.0009291933,0.0049606794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011391038,0.00093678694,0.0012962058,0.0022144925,0.031711888,0.0011530753,0.0028469465,0.0034920669,0.000636198],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012589049,0.002354159,0.015616319,0.0044699362,0.0046555744,0.012609956,0.19975396,0.00012529106,0.005945673,0.37432036,0.2843584,0.094531484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001866387,0.00047106092,0.002315057,0.001807527,0.0003729246,0.000056909044,0.066207044,0.0007090862,0.00012915824,0.01608325,0.9085644,0.0014172342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019441152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015385242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62420595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012802728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981731493","doi":"","title":"Exploring Solutions for Sustainable Rural Drinking Water Systems: a study of rural Newfoundland &amp; Labrador drinking water sytems&#13;\\n","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Scope (computer science); Water quality; Water source; Sustainability; Rural area; Water supply","score_opus":0.1018158813661356,"score_gpt":0.29706284065437805,"score_spread":0.19524695928824243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981731493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8683722,0.00009104981,0.0022326729,0.00013909987,0.037390318,0.0068558413,0.000047003636,0.00048200443,0.08438982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7512037,0.00037180865,0.00002425019,0.0000013307566,0.020911379,0.000012864307,0.00017252068,0.000094968265,0.22720717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862412,0.0038058087,0.00090620166,0.0011845997,0.0044047516,0.0034573933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98991436,0.000937915,0.00054283044,0.0013355792,0.006457241,0.00081209495],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008741654,0.0007587968,0.0017014685,0.0027535094,0.011551267,0.00093720003,0.0029371595,0.0010366515,0.00007890504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005207644,0.00069548894,0.00076749746,0.0013770072,0.005883072,0.0027263814,0.002203109,0.0015905563,0.000041686766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025645735,0.0072941855,0.01776179,0.0076736887,0.010792214,0.01242534,0.41935384,0.004673147,0.011351355,0.43040192,0.051225077,0.0014017122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005315786,0.0008689855,0.000042749434,0.0004381923,0.0007514041,0.000021269338,0.21295443,0.000024763569,0.00022147121,0.00029229815,0.7780647,0.0010039257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26782468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0510968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72683966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008251056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036634293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981775482","doi":"","title":"Extension de bande paramétrique pour les signaux audio de parole et de musique","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Knowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Memoria; Digital audio broadcasting; Video recording","score_opus":0.018261000542519504,"score_gpt":0.23566551197628424,"score_spread":0.21740451143376474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981775482","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07623159,0.02183852,0.41351366,0.00132448,0.00080517697,0.0005182363,0.00003271462,0.00006370545,0.4856719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74048555,0.006923551,0.009781779,0.00014865685,0.0005325193,0.0000014390492,0.000017047141,0.00004799211,0.24206147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971105,0.0010714144,0.00032501324,0.0004860828,0.00044818255,0.00055884384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847925,0.0002641853,0.0002636494,0.00040969983,0.00031056843,0.00027266683],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077689305,0.00037412503,0.00060705934,0.0001444222,0.0011577312,0.000032451047,0.0011483484,0.00084618304,0.0019009347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018493224,0.0003563569,0.0006523884,0.0003693254,0.011740839,0.00016476265,0.00034628744,0.0005239282,0.000049028018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014228263,0.0010350769,0.009822417,0.00231973,0.0005129464,0.00014186231,0.028025346,0.016723681,0.041016128,0.88515294,0.012127395,0.002980219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001827638,0.00014018531,0.027975317,0.01345254,0.0008008987,0.00012378753,0.0022284174,0.00776062,0.021809448,0.014928267,0.908002,0.00095085445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015335105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11617544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8958746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031869137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039336183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981807007","doi":"","title":"Feature Story: New research underway at the U of R into multiple sclerosis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"oURspace (University of Regina)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiple sclerosis; Gait; Feature (linguistics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Pattern recognition (psychology)","score_opus":0.07433149907931601,"score_gpt":0.2860693490657368,"score_spread":0.21173784998642076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981807007","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001430447,0.0019283626,0.0010051712,0.7915935,0.00033636476,0.0003482918,0.000028399636,0.00004863502,0.20456827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004239442,0.0027882014,0.00060638937,0.000008507327,0.0003277328,1.6478776e-7,0.000006453719,0.000053044423,0.99578553],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980644,0.00040919223,0.00000665391,0.0003157774,0.0008512536,0.00035274847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829733,0.00020906335,0.00034934023,0.0007977522,0.00016567932,0.00018085715],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008740399,0.0001426089,0.00033700385,0.00021751731,0.0017585962,0.000031602533,0.0014837192,0.0005129332,0.00017761788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013555805,0.0001274974,0.00017989389,0.00024373173,0.019576598,0.00012805605,0.00030383246,0.00042232676,0.00008319222],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022233591,0.0000096313615,0.00019122842,0.00003848808,0.00006736621,0.0000054761526,0.0047051013,5.2634755e-7,0.000035034627,0.026979502,0.96557754,0.0023678401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042122856,0.00004120858,0.00004547587,0.00030756116,0.000047256155,2.0937435e-7,0.0125729395,0.0000015539134,0.00001000664,0.000084366584,0.98632604,0.00014217186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006509564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29440984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79158497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031272037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059663336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982227592","doi":"","title":"How Canada's housing crisis is fuelling violence on our public-transit systems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.012687473179053015,"score_gpt":0.20080879895978676,"score_spread":0.18812132578073373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982227592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000006654875,0.000425999,0.000019701438,0.003946413,0.0019291664,0.00049496966,0.0002595654,0.0004459027,0.99247164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014075658,0.0017123297,0.000069462236,0.00046105715,0.00083902315,0.0000142384015,0.000034611476,0.00019776658,0.98259586],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973384,0.00015000446,0.00050904177,0.0003015259,0.0011055572,0.00059544883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838454,0.00011739331,0.00059408345,0.00038222232,0.00026398362,0.00025779658],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046798584,0.00035370994,0.0004983339,0.00011589428,0.0003862359,0.00040603965,0.0005722636,0.0005207729,0.018375449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013433161,0.0003382398,0.00016052982,0.00002942188,0.0006121237,8.4752946e-7,0.0000370384,0.00030389446,0.001830762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011876742,0.000015039151,0.0000020674734,0.0002776107,0.00006425935,0.00002430429,0.00079405797,0.00014094522,2.0509997e-8,0.0021169411,0.9954626,0.0010902522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020307886,0.00003845931,4.7882986e-7,0.0006273972,0.000041851647,0.000004231469,0.005642595,0.000018697629,0.0000016077413,0.000025306465,0.9929937,0.00040256514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8330359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8417021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016544687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028558393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034488417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6982724189","doi":"","title":"John C. Weaver, \\nThe Great Land Rush and the Making of \\nthe Modern World, 1650-1900,\\nMontréal &amp;amp; Kingston, McGill-Queen's \\nUniversity Press, 2003, X-497 p., $. 45.00.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Cairn.info","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Making-of; Land use; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.021073882389730743,"score_gpt":0.25762953064576366,"score_spread":0.23655564825603292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6982724189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009634953,0.0029427055,0.0030172854,0.00060428836,0.0012713128,0.0010474956,0.00034136622,0.00025940666,0.9904198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034957454,0.0032867664,0.00068172085,0.000354876,0.0012832208,0.000012696543,0.00003515626,0.00019025082,0.9906596],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966673,0.00033896236,0.00047836907,0.0006523654,0.001038764,0.0008242206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976841,0.00025422315,0.0007374186,0.000861714,0.00025460732,0.00020789687],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011228763,0.0005570528,0.0009182738,0.00036016293,0.0010713746,0.00015585532,0.001051682,0.0006853984,0.0036954693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021761346,0.00040048384,0.0002885568,0.0005821078,0.0107524935,0.0002734607,0.00030462077,0.0005246674,0.00011708075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002881128,0.00007640393,0.0016217983,0.0001384788,0.0003827892,0.000036017547,0.013054333,0.000018455547,0.0000032915118,0.2851277,0.69624007,0.0030125557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015146141,0.000012892704,0.00005271729,0.0002840251,0.00023329232,0.000005179294,0.0003196968,0.000028077044,0.00000598079,0.0018897254,0.99511534,0.0005384638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07291043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10643594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29887527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056501856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017723415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6985979270","doi":"","title":"Airku, Sehatku","year":2018,"lang":"id","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.017615957339921298,"score_gpt":0.2685214961991547,"score_spread":0.25090553885923345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6985979270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064945,0.000012979782,0.0049405694,0.0005124752,0.0053520184,0.0023128493,0.000050108538,0.0005307128,0.98563886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0043243724,0.0014912885,0.00079402706,0.00035772592,0.003799976,0.00024648925,0.00005469369,0.00045619672,0.9884752],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860389,0.0025986123,0.0014429933,0.0060101673,0.0019484194,0.0019608831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883405,0.00078950566,0.0012897815,0.007962045,0.0004929618,0.0011251883],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009761871,0.0012845707,0.0016119858,0.00043554476,0.0014157743,0.0007060211,0.005314113,0.0023649253,0.9864129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029929925,0.0013353906,0.0010195919,0.0007961491,0.025396029,0.0005292831,0.0029098322,0.0012457496,0.99180394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116301235,0.00087338366,0.005234452,0.00026297345,0.00082491693,0.00008921529,0.016251558,0.000013401999,0.00020751948,0.15797487,0.80520374,0.012947659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089602626,0.0000037952864,0.00066222786,0.00045838955,0.00033099865,0.000020302869,0.00069564517,0.000046648318,0.00054796494,0.017486444,0.9773464,0.0015051544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019091228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002305727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17214265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094653806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012051414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987466724","doi":"","title":"Subverting Democracy to Save Democracy: Canada’s Extra-Constitutional\\tApproaches to Battling “Fake News”","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misinformation; The Internet; Social media; Politics; Democracy; Referendum; Dictatorship; Analogy; Curiosity","score_opus":0.022060849734674984,"score_gpt":0.253617802586768,"score_spread":0.23155695285209305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987466724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58358526,0.00051101216,0.018714568,0.039817892,0.005568087,0.00258401,0.00010720821,0.0005207802,0.34859115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97427696,0.000015017598,0.003936923,0.0052680587,0.0013461036,0.000030106614,0.000017009199,0.000031990287,0.015077811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962873,0.00021821573,0.0005505149,0.0007663868,0.0010605277,0.0011170715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758023,0.0003666429,0.0001433785,0.0005448508,0.00022125925,0.0011436627],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009425216,0.00031751452,0.00043359798,0.00009889061,0.0018631712,0.00034091002,0.000816951,0.00019713791,0.0012769585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066054147,0.00030624543,0.00014436047,0.0005314167,0.0019301734,0.00065661076,0.00014209536,0.00037530085,0.0013832072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003252123,0.000039337523,0.03172322,0.000018546452,0.000038688046,0.0000226847,0.0016370445,0.00060472277,0.0003659908,0.95305026,0.010899505,0.0015674543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000665354,0.000073951785,0.002842916,0.00015201411,0.000047015335,0.000008504525,0.0035925051,0.00009996921,0.00084409193,0.021888012,0.9688019,0.000983739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45534533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88053596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95790243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008116901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002801024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987544065","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court and the People: Communicating Decisions to the Public","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Obligation; Meaning (existential); Original meaning; Majority opinion; Democracy; Court of record; Precedent","score_opus":0.029465211045788586,"score_gpt":0.28095859030942383,"score_spread":0.25149337926363524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987544065","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10089897,0.008286577,0.0016761884,0.73406345,0.002670401,0.0025460625,0.00007783307,0.00028504294,0.14949545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897474,0.0006331302,0.0001376062,0.0038057195,0.00035201042,0.00022999804,0.0000038800727,0.000014277679,0.005075983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674094,0.0015477453,0.000255711,0.00021432612,0.0007736661,0.0004676396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99490875,0.0036361523,0.00010158557,0.0010415621,0.00010348429,0.00020847542],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005414949,0.00010995771,0.00016031264,0.000018829338,0.016896704,0.00084101484,0.0023473308,0.000040666728,0.00048251473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014124477,0.000051972707,0.00009377172,0.0005388766,0.005969107,0.00019809518,0.0010081859,0.0005372832,0.0000989027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015089926,0.000017783117,0.0006882976,4.2690624e-7,0.000017137965,6.3594786e-7,0.01064979,0.000009770176,0.0000032609169,0.9618736,0.024667991,0.0020562327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003630545,0.00001961916,0.00043322795,0.000004249634,0.000014219888,0.0000041063718,0.019316368,0.000099642464,0.0000012542372,0.03651101,0.9431361,0.000097171636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055201347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12513503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9253626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009420231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018387086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99673605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987880320","doi":"","title":"2020 veto package / by Jessica Schaeffer-Helmecki, associate legislative attorney","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"State Elections Enforcement Commission (State of Connecticut)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Legislative Assembly of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Legislature; Legislative intent; Legislative history; Power of attorney","score_opus":0.020522572293639407,"score_gpt":0.28449689013881374,"score_spread":0.26397431784517433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987880320","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048031196,0.0013249608,0.22628048,0.025007747,0.0032214837,0.0039533726,0.0008958534,0.0014504247,0.6898345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588114,0.0008190743,0.00022794424,0.0005183615,0.00025451873,0.000057552086,0.00008579451,0.000055620854,0.03916973],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960839,0.0006217019,0.0008183763,0.00058450236,0.0010177378,0.00087373814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973079,0.0004970116,0.0005965087,0.000351207,0.0005177174,0.00072964793],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006942907,0.00038552954,0.00060001056,0.00012597557,0.0016362217,0.00018759373,0.0005450825,0.00013977643,0.0020478172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070584816,0.0003546665,0.00024513155,0.0011720787,0.0024474435,0.0006227614,0.000113873226,0.00049179647,0.00014315244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077160104,0.00076502113,0.001458268,0.0001486719,0.001003764,0.000047449765,0.12766752,0.00066193956,0.014489142,0.21321207,0.616414,0.02336053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016054956,0.0007822914,0.000046065932,0.00007501519,0.00009223087,0.0000013892483,0.0035334954,0.0007198173,0.016541773,0.0070678107,0.9689517,0.00058292673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012220959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054347917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9107802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037415797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050299976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989766556","doi":"","title":"Canadian MP Wants To Criminalize Speech That Endorses Fossil Fuels","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fossil fuel; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Free speech","score_opus":0.04622305251378861,"score_gpt":0.3143730403694947,"score_spread":0.2681499878557061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989766556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000009869773,0.0023270673,0.0001938055,0.002123319,0.0037652124,0.00047080062,0.00014721845,0.00033201842,0.9906307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020928099,0.000336848,0.0005582755,0.00080728886,0.002263931,0.000021369946,0.0000072769512,0.00023808483,0.9936741],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997939,0.0000764131,0.00014910423,0.00051118707,0.00056468847,0.0007596032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987256,0.00002961411,0.000047816135,0.00034712025,0.00003580602,0.00081404945],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026917772,0.0002711863,0.000335233,0.00039350748,0.0002311643,0.0003354586,0.0006306977,0.00044418994,0.07086371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049764567,0.00020715917,0.00013908678,0.0002783821,0.0019584296,0.00006515123,0.000045842953,0.00016750129,0.010930249],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.2894604e-7,0.0000063128477,0.000026517866,0.000030519903,0.000034360735,0.00012449732,0.0028911186,7.527406e-9,7.9645787e-7,0.2224204,0.76915175,0.0053128744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058482186,0.000019278223,0.0000026035232,0.00013339087,0.000054044962,0.0000025740276,0.0024698412,1.2794114e-7,0.00003968818,0.010263641,0.98660314,0.0003531616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89185804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98844445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2174514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003630556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010427732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98983985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989897860","doi":"","title":"Community Empowerment and Environmental Ordinances in the United States: A Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"BCU Open Access Repository (Birmingham City University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fordham University; Princeton University; McGill University; Pennsylvania State University; Dartmouth College; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Legislature; Politics; State (computer science); Local government; Commission; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Empowerment","score_opus":0.04745682909368203,"score_gpt":0.32855233257292665,"score_spread":0.2810955034792446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989897860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09130841,0.00015034179,0.0001501631,0.00018455944,0.0004989785,0.0026629532,0.00007613113,0.00009536704,0.9048731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3346372,0.000823428,0.00001824839,0.00014675934,0.00009557343,0.00001076464,0.000060674898,0.000041434465,0.6641659],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606323,0.0024804275,0.00022749572,0.00045054132,0.0004455011,0.00033282986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986986,0.00021904055,0.0003102114,0.0006424757,0.00002489527,0.00010476281],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000879614,0.0002847138,0.00042079875,0.0006050092,0.0020036981,0.0011240399,0.0044880235,0.00023289528,0.0002472675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024071416,0.0002459872,0.00006497925,0.0008819332,0.004267534,0.0006964745,0.0019903455,0.0005819995,0.0000034226528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004662112,0.008473104,0.4170239,0.00024275576,0.00095963496,0.002609901,0.21664128,0.000029950119,0.0000071804598,0.064217694,0.28716242,0.0021659888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009149339,0.000096372016,0.0039583608,0.0001538271,0.000103454215,0.0000016044423,0.13027433,0.0000050133913,0.0000026992177,0.00023773486,0.8639246,0.00032707644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23687284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05983909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5767622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003807071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028348665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990055664","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Cases (Pt 4) | Police Powers and the Exclusion of Evidence (Panel B)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law enforcement; Constitutional law; Qualified immunity; Constitutional right; Constitutional review; Criminal procedure; Constitution; Scope (computer science)","score_opus":0.08385620175104481,"score_gpt":0.32193783203455756,"score_spread":0.23808163028351276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990055664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7926427,0.005721962,0.0018330778,0.028425634,0.0037739803,0.0018791056,0.00020038211,0.0006776892,0.16484545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99443495,0.0009882986,0.00006028276,0.0004798218,0.00036527799,0.000011673925,0.0000037721468,0.0000043670398,0.0036515428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985578,0.00024066423,0.00020647998,0.00020536775,0.0005089588,0.00028072967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982863,0.0011566633,0.00009017705,0.00020219835,0.00010834729,0.00015631017],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011598767,0.000095485295,0.00017821159,0.00003161144,0.0010341123,0.0000807198,0.00029763507,0.0000848963,0.0003044048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006367913,0.000057465582,0.00007251062,0.00038033037,0.029157002,0.0003673077,0.000118319505,0.000121333935,0.00015082791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044828597,0.000011826578,0.0013314674,0.000011592177,0.000012282716,0.000010103431,0.0034247194,0.0000099694,0.000097289434,0.9917651,0.0030547306,0.00022608714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035736738,0.00017303467,0.004577817,0.0006083925,0.0001513063,0.00006776364,0.017901802,0.00017771713,0.00062834244,0.11046966,0.8609285,0.0007420065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030072434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009011797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88129544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004654036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002131274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97638637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998527609","doi":"","title":"The Admissibility of Social MediaEvidence in Canada:Part 1","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Social media; Subject (documents); Context (archaeology); Witness; Space (punctuation); Criminal trial","score_opus":0.018754460178777885,"score_gpt":0.22717066385160678,"score_spread":0.2084162036728289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998527609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9431825,0.00061403064,0.00043873713,0.020843936,0.0009189561,0.0002824508,0.000062535575,0.000021723768,0.033635095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99410814,0.00020162087,0.000110413974,0.000049615584,0.00010212582,1.4689726e-7,0.000002561974,0.000002389207,0.005422962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877936,0.00024787415,0.00013530045,0.00016669587,0.00046225268,0.00020850995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905163,0.00037246462,0.00012766117,0.00016091824,0.00019192569,0.00009541215],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005437373,0.000052953394,0.00018122405,0.000023369043,0.0005527087,0.000008798898,0.00042109317,0.0000708592,0.00050970516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024706128,0.00005319636,0.00007185739,0.00041987238,0.0034856733,0.00014857936,0.000091430644,0.00010472807,0.0000030491742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014034045,0.00024055199,0.10771634,0.000087636,0.00008322281,0.00020405765,0.0579748,0.000020506746,0.0002447765,0.7793877,0.028516756,0.025383295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010583203,0.00003879007,0.1780958,0.00007729185,0.000048628324,9.782146e-7,0.1611898,0.00013292728,0.00029066845,0.017584441,0.64118063,0.00030171516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6817913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76180327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003470561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005596429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6998538146","doi":"","title":"Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Matthew Rodriquez","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; Georgetown University; University of Pittsburgh; York University; George Mason University; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Prosperity; Foundation (evidence); State (computer science); Order (exchange); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.02747216695654588,"score_gpt":0.30052091926680985,"score_spread":0.273048752310264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6998538146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20258386,0.0017679617,0.17009273,0.028813913,0.0076234965,0.0051287394,0.00019046884,0.001204494,0.58259434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9614665,0.00014930035,0.006298439,0.0015092645,0.0018137399,0.00025731162,0.00008666429,0.00003231972,0.02838646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984195,0.00018355531,0.00021410888,0.0003587941,0.0004161157,0.00040792648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893475,0.00010091188,0.00009048751,0.00030764742,0.00034831508,0.0002178631],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006469261,0.00011956948,0.00020572657,0.000018599547,0.0008915275,0.00027962052,0.00024273829,0.000111600806,0.0020915377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027555926,0.00011365881,0.00012921341,0.00026579446,0.0028804687,0.00042557588,0.000036912803,0.00012791707,0.0002673893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001011349,0.00007476252,0.0015558968,0.000015753512,0.00001952574,0.0000038405838,0.0013311778,0.000003473355,0.00034508758,0.9892763,0.0034472225,0.0039168806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043830028,0.00003466045,0.0003115251,0.000018354196,0.000029948738,0.0000016238706,0.0013619523,0.000051256222,0.0011665287,0.087745704,0.9086231,0.0002170474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002299404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016881038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90517586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019365386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043581967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000353346","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Expression and the Charter: 1982-2022","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Freedom of expression; Supreme court; Freedom of information; Jurisprudence; Metropolitan area; Expression (computer science); Qualitative analysis","score_opus":0.01613072472650393,"score_gpt":0.2592617879466618,"score_spread":0.2431310632201579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000353346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6886274,0.004685098,0.0015165649,0.020260476,0.0061460095,0.002247636,0.00019488872,0.0010716567,0.27525026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98498195,0.00064799015,0.0000891844,0.0003257328,0.0008053439,0.000036300222,0.000009154058,0.000014617739,0.013089718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851304,0.00027804167,0.00021345052,0.0002225993,0.00046144932,0.00031138657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991021,0.00028518622,0.00009526338,0.00031003676,0.00005632657,0.00015106662],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011443987,0.00010080525,0.00021327773,0.000039254435,0.0007561559,0.000087857494,0.00037195967,0.00010126447,0.00056955236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014642542,0.000063856816,0.00009027417,0.00031569335,0.007869688,0.00023556508,0.000113723974,0.00015775449,0.00020231801],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036049805,0.000018291143,0.0008140546,0.000011823259,0.00001341818,0.0000044321655,0.006112725,0.0000038274943,0.0012445814,0.975099,0.016134392,0.00050737546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00286387,0.00006473008,0.0009715879,0.0000962639,0.000039820414,0.0000017916034,0.005633221,0.00017372108,0.0017007833,0.11548211,0.8726604,0.00031170718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003178329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024178657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85961694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020968022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059371898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000475886","doi":"","title":"Free Speech Radio News lineup - Friday, December 02, 2005","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Government (linguistics); Economic shortage; Welfare; Poverty; General election","score_opus":0.00805933295612923,"score_gpt":0.20703312207273367,"score_spread":0.19897378911660443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000475886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004285529,0.0011828421,0.0000102008025,0.00045918612,0.0013537072,0.0006968684,0.00021636183,0.00028684235,0.9957897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000029646466,0.002893164,0.0021229158,0.0005443377,0.0011977239,0.00001557388,0.000093324066,0.00015207328,0.9929512],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698704,0.0002281629,0.00080311514,0.0003183122,0.0009624999,0.0007008745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789727,0.00015339754,0.0007212379,0.0007043713,0.00018412549,0.00033962334],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005466529,0.0004472094,0.0006170928,0.00011723881,0.00027569776,0.00014942857,0.0008897943,0.00092781713,0.6756586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029155888,0.00042360928,0.00029428414,0.000020052215,0.0028695432,6.878859e-7,0.000089679765,0.000393636,0.019052139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026649268,0.000057631765,0.0000031587965,0.00012195498,0.00007109318,0.000028195938,0.00055844703,0.00002409343,5.51067e-8,0.0055817105,0.9917857,0.001741323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075638306,0.000055086675,6.1562207e-7,0.00013382938,0.000075031785,0.00003154902,0.00033151946,0.0000026986509,0.0000045639727,0.00027507282,0.9978105,0.0005231569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02449963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09279135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6566065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013569363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018582962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014917998","doi":"","title":"Regulatory Reform Should Be About Strengthening Legislative Responsibility","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rulemaking; Deregulation; Regulatory state; Legislature; Lawmaking; Regulatory reform; Separation of powers; Administrative law; White paper; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.04945465674493301,"score_gpt":0.32465309480421095,"score_spread":0.27519843805927796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014917998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21634932,0.00036232942,0.00029085236,0.0035547246,0.001477075,0.0004577469,0.000051622486,0.00028883034,0.7771675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578907,0.00006345856,0.00064103643,0.00050189014,0.0013124289,0.000022023427,0.000007379076,0.00002710211,0.039534014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970622,0.00036718944,0.0004072254,0.0006006548,0.00085617224,0.0007065309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972002,0.00019438629,0.0003525495,0.001574488,0.0002160376,0.00046235576],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026141226,0.00023841782,0.00035911816,0.00004980414,0.004631246,0.0006138618,0.0011723216,0.0003308497,0.00085016876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009823552,0.00020065869,0.00019988055,0.000106858024,0.014118664,0.0015687199,0.00020638437,0.00049988093,0.00017704035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093523995,0.000045761866,0.0036071122,0.000007674274,0.000032498992,0.000015093519,0.0056416644,0.000001618258,0.00010833676,0.98706263,0.0015794027,0.0018046646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080925145,0.00007538059,0.016994193,0.0000854578,0.000037426675,0.0000013925389,0.0023976301,0.000022246388,0.00081686955,0.06457597,0.91367316,0.0005110179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019325806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050511178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92248666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000535736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052140595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015568231","doi":"","title":"The Sydney River McDonalds Shooting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crew; Shot (pellet); Griffin; Evening; Falling (accident); Stove; Midnight; Full moon","score_opus":0.007348877163001165,"score_gpt":0.2010355495110448,"score_spread":0.19368667234804363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015568231","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000037506215,0.0006199988,0.0000014087993,0.00069939595,0.0009351455,0.00041922752,0.000085079584,0.00020027207,0.99703574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00019755558,0.0010207586,0.0001818079,0.00036517775,0.0006116103,0.000022781438,0.00007204121,0.0000838208,0.99744445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977282,0.00024594174,0.00049475546,0.00018334694,0.0009103269,0.00043738016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99850434,0.00032390357,0.0005696304,0.00035041705,0.00011364306,0.00013809156],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082079816,0.00023758246,0.00029044208,0.000047558016,0.00097374525,0.00012462569,0.00076910906,0.00030927025,0.67218065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026206678,0.0001880102,0.0001997892,0.0000141317305,0.0044289576,2.6297892e-7,0.00015078697,0.00035439283,0.006638218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000182597,0.000018405017,0.0000047758667,0.000056541252,0.000053396994,0.0000085095335,0.0018352619,0.000027560132,1.0823051e-8,0.01613102,0.9797927,0.0020535209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022210724,0.000040524323,0.0000016100104,0.000048021735,0.000037795227,0.000007184754,0.0013005823,0.000004108377,2.2700345e-7,0.00018445429,0.9979006,0.000252809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012879096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009010873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6655424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012882629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010689538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017473874","doi":"","title":"Balancing freedom of the press and the right to privacy : lessons for China","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Right to privacy; Freedom of information; The Right to Privacy; Privilege (computing); China; Autonomy; Balance (ability); Freedom of the press","score_opus":0.014771866703871773,"score_gpt":0.26551831608724696,"score_spread":0.2507464493833752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017473874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6248029,0.0013499735,0.00003353721,0.001601036,0.006628326,0.007230357,0.002948654,0.00025903745,0.35514617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621243,0.00019169648,0.00031542167,0.00013182417,0.00030437298,0.00029971878,0.000113961985,0.00009120855,0.036427535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961897,0.0006596295,0.00072585937,0.0007333062,0.0009731398,0.0007183411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971442,0.00077343686,0.0006678839,0.00081420806,0.00038268632,0.00021754362],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021095094,0.00047431458,0.00074263406,0.00011174179,0.0041554063,0.00018250382,0.0016072107,0.00058729126,0.00004817376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014070254,0.0002900826,0.00047275185,0.0004379562,0.0026544116,0.00041879504,0.00017894826,0.00071021577,0.000007754638],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016616822,0.000072581875,0.000019684181,0.00013896277,0.00009459813,0.000001569352,0.0005590607,0.000029809886,0.00094768044,0.9900671,0.00011851963,0.007784255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028625645,0.0000916595,0.0029698082,0.0006062292,0.0005799629,0.0000034616587,0.0011157206,0.00003806622,0.014406883,0.27623022,0.70009303,0.0010024038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063051665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027021598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7138369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002647609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000116659045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023509251","doi":"","title":"[Ordered] Liberty and Justice for All? The Elusive \"Right to Privacy\" and a Comparison of American and Canadian Women's Rights Schemes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Human rights; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Bill of rights; Legislature; Normative; Commission","score_opus":0.01732870486897633,"score_gpt":0.2645570976832335,"score_spread":0.24722839281425715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023509251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990523,0.0005990763,0.00093021995,0.0059479238,0.00010984338,0.00039150944,0.0001793355,0.000026444828,0.0012926592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800646,0.00005582211,0.0012404122,0.000087085304,0.000050860668,0.0000012632398,0.0000040633845,0.000006994599,0.00054704474],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904597,0.00011754872,0.00009208307,0.0002507982,0.00018890481,0.00030467313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901885,0.00022260382,0.00007583928,0.00017872873,0.00012604643,0.000377919],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044215142,0.000109385845,0.00028377463,0.00017637288,0.0013897625,0.00008634004,0.0002951506,0.00007962439,0.00001707435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006870672,0.00009134814,0.00004736309,0.00033834687,0.0046219802,0.0002670867,0.000130003,0.00020979147,0.0000020154832],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013096233,0.000052995492,0.016290935,0.00022679081,0.00030846026,0.000022846867,0.6628078,0.0000035921678,0.00010810462,0.3120203,0.0025966002,0.005430607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006803208,0.00030057592,0.0066897534,0.00008609659,0.0004076214,0.000003409493,0.16698603,0.00049301924,0.000042774092,0.008459528,0.8155322,0.00031863432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027376518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15890922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81293565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008783008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020701897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023644703","doi":"","title":"Patrick: Protecting Canadians' Privacy Interest in Garbage; 'A Step Too Far' for the Supreme Court","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Abandonment (legal); Government (linguistics); The Right to Privacy; State (computer science); Action (physics); Obligation; Duty","score_opus":0.03569058013775789,"score_gpt":0.27871528192269474,"score_spread":0.24302470178493685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023644703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61419123,0.0060040876,0.06370639,0.11771357,0.0072726007,0.0199022,0.0002704027,0.001248623,0.16969089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914222,0.000059588026,0.0006534718,0.0018701846,0.00096171704,0.000099982346,0.0000051292864,0.00001949126,0.004908289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980026,0.00022725535,0.00035263365,0.00036615276,0.00029159914,0.0007597482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869716,0.00038222905,0.00011973611,0.00040308968,0.00011458065,0.00028321563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001494861,0.00018208055,0.00023862623,0.00006745232,0.0012516845,0.00031813074,0.00080279954,0.00016881691,0.00019050753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007083202,0.00013679158,0.00012854509,0.00037913636,0.0012882124,0.00040113536,0.000041026993,0.0004454226,0.0000543408],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047743775,0.000090734735,0.0028895056,0.00001873984,0.00002828625,0.00002382438,0.00869459,0.000019831163,0.00012352546,0.9577419,0.011462668,0.018858636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010369837,0.00015911083,0.0023173825,0.000058821435,0.00002995157,0.0000026638113,0.0046621272,0.00023166157,0.00014073431,0.02490546,0.9660536,0.0004014767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08403475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45715064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.954591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033712425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037716326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96270716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023826727","doi":"","title":"Petitioner's Observations (February 2007) for the Redress of Violations of Human Rights Guaranteed by The American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholars Crossing (Liberty University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Redress; Commission; Prison; Abortion; Government (linguistics); Declaration; Freedom of expression","score_opus":0.04350640219339257,"score_gpt":0.30343087801083113,"score_spread":0.25992447581743855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023826727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920753,0.000038550304,0.003071015,0.00035072552,0.00011682832,0.0004351641,0.00008585652,0.000019433015,0.0038071284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960807,0.0000041768353,0.0002490985,0.00003149188,0.000045906716,0.0000010143484,0.000014703105,0.000007287104,0.0035656106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847853,0.0003108321,0.00039094867,0.00020606832,0.0003967817,0.00021681385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977924,0.00049222965,0.00086890435,0.00039217193,0.00039417777,0.000060068447],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007278141,0.00014095446,0.00029076193,0.00016963163,0.006370555,0.00008858429,0.0006122842,0.00007596996,0.000021566542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036088353,0.00008062875,0.00016400451,0.0007747398,0.019828206,0.00042255988,0.00007050122,0.00021380774,2.0455902e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002674573,0.00042507876,0.014634465,0.00003519256,0.00017536496,0.000001611527,0.020255549,0.000039319435,0.024513837,0.9375087,0.0017349905,0.00040841647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038349566,0.001382877,0.5047168,0.0011480472,0.00085460686,0.0000042806005,0.016185552,0.0002611657,0.09836716,0.11032402,0.26203817,0.0008823494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023402011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023987057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8271847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008753879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006933436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028717854","doi":"","title":"The following is a commentary from Dawn Vanzant from Investorideas.com - How does an Aquarium Influence Vancouver's Upcoming Election?…It's a Whale of a Tale","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Whale; Fishing; Whaling; Indian ocean; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.009431413887930472,"score_gpt":0.25161101079073533,"score_spread":0.24217959690280486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028717854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04421682,0.0060878475,0.05481966,0.0489401,0.05459271,0.0062420997,0.0020557435,0.002591372,0.7804536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11958906,0.000929936,0.003655218,0.010109028,0.007052968,0.00012571643,0.00015479702,0.00051401695,0.85786927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970216,0.00047289647,0.00042083167,0.0006536529,0.0008665806,0.00056445133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764186,0.0006407903,0.0005475308,0.00083819183,0.0000722249,0.0002594113],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006021523,0.00040269407,0.00065817917,0.000118202515,0.0010375761,0.0003640194,0.0011462258,0.00046225262,0.0015574647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000101162455,0.00024975144,0.0003047491,0.0002569245,0.0037275804,0.0005079891,0.0001319003,0.00034672348,0.00002342508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001891372,0.000084952604,0.0023918462,0.000012932719,0.00037956686,0.000006224078,0.01147058,0.0000010332986,0.00013923385,0.0060400236,0.978454,0.0010006711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000528734,0.0000546426,0.000044277822,0.00021297284,0.00015649588,9.642081e-8,0.008203665,0.000071315015,0.00023228841,0.014294377,0.97574556,0.00045559267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3814922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5747802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19328801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019247559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024085306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030573456","doi":"","title":"NH Primary: Easy to Vote and Accurately Counted, Support for First-in-the-Nation Amendment 2/20/2024","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Quarter (Canadian coin); State (computer science); Voting; Contingent vote; State government","score_opus":0.038628929795256,"score_gpt":0.25391768567023193,"score_spread":0.21528875587497592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030573456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9282512,0.001137001,0.021688284,0.01737572,0.0019281108,0.0028684856,0.00018779488,0.00030665274,0.026256733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79557145,0.0005693915,0.0036809107,0.00038245018,0.00039713207,6.563707e-7,0.0000958095,0.000043038504,0.19925916],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743485,0.00022298044,0.00028567287,0.0007415172,0.0008162415,0.0004987438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982476,0.00039474506,0.00025322413,0.00045821926,0.00020262809,0.0004435768],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092491374,0.00029017712,0.0004821198,0.0003442978,0.0014736366,0.00019429131,0.0009984048,0.00031371464,0.00009005968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055785757,0.00033781852,0.00028875918,0.0007059516,0.0018613073,0.0017185282,0.0002942393,0.00035775235,0.000030427955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032864169,0.00067382376,0.022733418,0.0016313818,0.00090008025,0.0017648188,0.5233713,0.00024199062,0.00811423,0.063923135,0.35315207,0.020207392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018038838,0.0003540243,0.0070977383,0.00035924272,0.00022855574,0.000033666896,0.027918639,0.00011790048,0.00010565556,0.000898728,0.9606114,0.00047056578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029917343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013584625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60745937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008632008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081512163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038387253","doi":"","title":"1971 House Bill 5403. An Act Providing That Certain Members Of The West Springfield Police Relief Association, Incorporated May, Upon Pension Or Retirement From The West Springfield Police Department, Be Paid Certain Sums Of Money By Said Association In Lieu Of Death Benefits.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"State Library's electronic repository (State Library of Massachusetts)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Pension; House of Representatives; Legislation; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.017601456060137518,"score_gpt":0.24069523102641968,"score_spread":0.22309377496628216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038387253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8824043,0.0026123628,0.000042069372,0.014602765,0.0016184953,0.0059991055,0.0035817877,0.0009253271,0.08821374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8265865,0.00876173,0.00018719389,0.00041709453,0.00042585525,0.000073268784,0.00040402243,0.0005713882,0.16257295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916804,0.0024706062,0.0017889378,0.0009809632,0.001772057,0.0013070488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913688,0.0014793178,0.005518884,0.001263281,0.000115246425,0.0002544763],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011885863,0.0007676439,0.0013163594,0.00038119106,0.0003803386,0.00019763024,0.0019268411,0.0008729138,0.0005806644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012422419,0.00048522608,0.0004021776,0.00092874933,0.000850045,0.002083771,0.00040806364,0.00085369864,0.00000403132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014221482,0.0008566397,0.7289074,0.0003791827,0.0014368065,0.000012814819,0.014940389,0.00013137596,0.0054536145,0.007476249,0.23846093,0.00052245887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007949896,0.0027375165,0.036245216,0.0046376735,0.0011813096,0.000005255447,0.004893733,0.0001782849,0.31330612,0.00782412,0.6173834,0.0036574393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09172608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023040367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6926622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066264387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019640338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043271346","doi":"","title":"Secretaries of State roundtable \"sold out;\" waitlist started","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Press Releases","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ticket; State (computer science); Administration (probate law); Presidential system; Center (category theory); Event (particle physics)","score_opus":0.07261796189458841,"score_gpt":0.28883644821092774,"score_spread":0.21621848631633933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043271346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8324246,0.010487825,0.02770879,0.0010168814,0.0019508664,0.0010911446,0.0004170621,0.0006952337,0.12420764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9275348,0.002207941,0.00019701284,0.0000559506,0.00017609468,0.000012528476,0.000013552308,0.0000135412565,0.069788575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986285,0.00012918611,0.00023975912,0.00020043683,0.00044515447,0.0003569373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991762,0.00016800167,0.0001226897,0.00023098719,0.00016332431,0.00013878322],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013952878,0.000111981695,0.00023647274,0.000034235003,0.00054784794,0.0000879305,0.0002768641,0.00006772888,0.00024297061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017311815,0.00009507727,0.000081585895,0.000106300424,0.00540193,0.0007051092,0.000042988027,0.000084394866,0.000022613101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039067987,0.0008542216,0.03282139,0.00020069773,0.00032463446,0.0001396861,0.11528853,0.00035975582,0.0013103635,0.77095497,0.07368927,0.003665838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007967204,0.00012201297,0.0011756469,0.000050717037,0.000060984392,0.0000030834738,0.0015682614,0.00013542765,0.0091109695,0.017315747,0.9692348,0.00042561803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016571872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004466012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89554554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054394113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017759773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043338604","doi":"","title":"SHAPING A MORE EQUITABLE ELECTION SYSTEM: A CANADIAN APPROACH TO SOLVING THE VOTING RIGHTS CRISIS IN AMERICA","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Proportionality (law); First-past-the-post voting; Disapproval voting; Straight-ticket voting; Ranked voting system; Test (biology)","score_opus":0.018730931246733456,"score_gpt":0.26822007842429973,"score_spread":0.2494891471775663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043338604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02706552,0.0013119051,0.054265514,0.011014741,0.0020261188,0.0021491097,0.000017509252,0.00047235427,0.90167725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99360484,0.000006875604,0.0008147111,0.0017783553,0.00041879623,0.00011929445,0.0000040062805,0.000013405576,0.0032397066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976348,0.00027719018,0.00031751842,0.0004347702,0.00035755508,0.0009781377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908525,0.000107436106,0.000076493685,0.00028592563,0.000107536216,0.00033733554],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001158457,0.00016323353,0.00026354252,0.00021461619,0.0027992856,0.0004526052,0.0005640238,0.00013854842,0.000046150824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014123844,0.00012629824,0.00008462058,0.0014768143,0.0008407146,0.00037410957,0.000074321106,0.00031793886,0.00007289469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006364073,0.00002362237,0.00084363215,0.000043654327,0.000024483827,0.0000061701408,0.007928897,0.0003156145,0.00003352519,0.98203576,0.008423356,0.0003149035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009663716,0.000064908694,0.0009200329,0.0008915321,0.00012724804,0.000007707466,0.094400056,0.010970405,0.0001911459,0.011627843,0.8787516,0.001081161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8750309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8509527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97040796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012232817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005475147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043770351","doi":"","title":"Wall Street's Most Polarizing Stock Was a Top Buy for 7 Billionaires in the Fourth Quarter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stock (firearms); Quarter (Canadian coin); Payment; Stock market","score_opus":0.032683127818258904,"score_gpt":0.29476554230471147,"score_spread":0.2620824144864526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043770351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007794382,0.00042632333,0.007765415,0.010131776,0.001563579,0.0021164035,0.000103266386,0.00071486953,0.97710043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056916694,0.00025092417,0.00053642486,0.0009068337,0.0021636698,0.00015583902,0.00002532843,0.00030597506,0.98996335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983621,0.00013980213,0.00021065645,0.0003426271,0.00045480859,0.0004900094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991095,0.00038314733,0.00010401578,0.0002999281,0.000033031694,0.000070394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062321743,0.00020236651,0.00026679173,0.00018918052,0.0003021581,0.00015210938,0.00062280416,0.00036156978,0.0008258533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008471131,0.00011695816,0.00014234934,0.00037229524,0.0015064836,0.00009240026,0.000029530811,0.00017226949,0.000099031815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036963472,0.0000336384,0.0008947399,0.000015342706,0.000028657154,0.000005113338,0.006519796,4.064249e-7,5.2929994e-7,0.46965674,0.52054435,0.0022969937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003024414,0.000049523842,0.00010399419,0.00008286913,0.000020492747,1.9687671e-7,0.0061158184,0.00003435005,7.8675345e-7,0.00902195,0.9840247,0.00024288586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051762108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5455828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4938207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007515452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017916704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9545523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7046034753","doi":"","title":"Children Behind Bars: A Path to Reducing Pre-Adjudicative Detention in the Juvenile Justice System","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Juvenile delinquency; Juvenile court; Economic Justice; Juvenile; Criminal justice; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.014260452880789639,"score_gpt":0.2639814383731241,"score_spread":0.24972098549233446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7046034753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92282355,0.000986926,0.0030633651,0.0031020215,0.002234101,0.003072991,0.00016652563,0.00032207638,0.064228475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963936,0.000013783007,0.0002964092,0.0005709123,0.0008467581,0.00032732243,0.000020597894,0.00001701172,0.0015135568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695754,0.001025141,0.0003337768,0.00042215516,0.00079837174,0.00046303094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990495,0.00015983927,0.00015135946,0.00039987036,0.000059059592,0.00018040393],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022689095,0.00013816192,0.00021041336,0.00007137727,0.0020520727,0.0001847513,0.00082165527,0.00007113416,0.00026174446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001677651,0.000113126815,0.00009613123,0.0005094384,0.0008794074,0.0002985882,0.0001537525,0.0004015363,0.00012481472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005351609,0.00020618149,0.00313519,0.000048760554,0.000036949514,0.000028447179,0.07774683,0.0005372737,0.0001222634,0.910689,0.00648143,0.0009141526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006070368,0.0017199377,0.10562781,0.0010577271,0.0012987289,0.0001390206,0.3900711,0.00094752264,0.00057333964,0.03367865,0.4555858,0.00323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013753757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004638075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87701035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046313964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000190094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99924713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070490738","doi":"","title":"Policing's Free-Speech Problem at the St. John's Law Faculty Workshop","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Legislation; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.026927441773813683,"score_gpt":0.29501273031777175,"score_spread":0.2680852885439581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070490738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030800812,0.003550656,0.0009220383,0.044453837,0.0036308412,0.0015587119,0.00040985452,0.0015206132,0.91315264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7243642,0.00036311752,0.0009830414,0.0047037643,0.005210348,0.00013807525,0.00009153391,0.00010474548,0.26404116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968659,0.00028236426,0.00037029578,0.00060880993,0.0009623488,0.00091023603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982915,0.00032937905,0.000083029605,0.0007682399,0.00011990464,0.00040798215],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011942228,0.00028919222,0.00029708055,0.000047317735,0.002239621,0.000981854,0.0011764275,0.00029803562,0.002790909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011479998,0.00018798388,0.00025700816,0.0006595629,0.0075109536,0.0006515653,0.00033223856,0.0005989303,0.0019190517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009208667,0.000029706702,0.000117249365,0.000021489903,0.000049860617,0.00003761692,0.0040499107,0.000010897258,0.00006774275,0.8493999,0.1449912,0.001215207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025969747,0.000025835952,0.000026731204,0.000100792604,0.000045592165,0.000007167892,0.0009636555,0.000022135062,0.0003692198,0.082863376,0.9150122,0.0003036266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032678816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24660042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77002096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040608094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023307625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7070899650","doi":"","title":"Republican Leaders in the House and Senate","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"House of Representatives; House of Commons; Work (physics); White (mutation); Congressman; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.030409524731042328,"score_gpt":0.24122942347845458,"score_spread":0.21081989874741225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7070899650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9717543,0.00012302629,0.00013264954,0.0052379165,0.00008111237,0.00022142766,0.000009413893,0.00004822574,0.022391938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725354,0.00010961678,0.00010417862,0.00015999304,0.000023231758,1.2385152e-7,0.0000034100312,0.000006171592,0.0023397098],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878925,0.0003201512,0.000086743225,0.00020473794,0.00035148248,0.0002476623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992457,0.00014471877,0.00008059713,0.00034280636,0.00008622056,0.00009995931],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007399267,0.0000801281,0.00016215543,0.00015769652,0.0006079111,0.00016467755,0.0006941526,0.00008236585,0.000084543324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050596544,0.00007442851,0.000059736652,0.0005554989,0.0043341625,0.0016307092,0.00009469369,0.0003368788,0.000029196552],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023352943,0.00007693192,0.8048877,0.000009762921,0.00003021132,0.00002355864,0.037806347,0.0000036286347,0.000010355699,0.15348445,0.0012723361,0.002371377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009218763,0.000077338445,0.7158781,0.000022308499,0.000039043152,0.00000216224,0.03855714,0.000029280342,0.0000014087893,0.0014712156,0.24279271,0.00020740186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005091658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11148743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24152038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051531126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010560265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071993780","doi":"","title":"Vermonters Divided on Holiday Greeting; More Likely to Have Real Christmas Tree 12/20/2023","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Christmas tree; Tree (set theory); Quarter (Canadian coin); Tree of life (biology)","score_opus":0.03527517633960458,"score_gpt":0.2461058301091589,"score_spread":0.21083065376955432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071993780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9443165,0.000088711015,0.00076184975,0.0049561714,0.0009101941,0.00085395545,0.00008403642,0.0005273986,0.047501154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7103231,0.00038999028,0.0011986959,0.00021702649,0.00047424846,2.4628378e-7,0.00009105716,0.000065406144,0.28724024],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995233,0.00044780786,0.00043139097,0.0012451302,0.0016063236,0.0010363543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960953,0.00036753816,0.0006887623,0.0011740279,0.00029090449,0.0013834754],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007517304,0.00054146326,0.0009367695,0.0007018746,0.0025477123,0.00012752337,0.0021940272,0.0006286281,0.00022584733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001375478,0.00072442985,0.00072979555,0.0011909439,0.004084135,0.0014704064,0.00091096276,0.00059108273,0.0003978195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048422595,0.0006412033,0.105486475,0.00031510426,0.0011129923,0.0036303634,0.40079707,0.0005412464,0.01725671,0.007843504,0.4381665,0.019366588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006598453,0.0010444695,0.2133724,0.00095520634,0.00051712856,0.000028463468,0.13876423,0.00014066849,0.0009814297,0.0006197004,0.6351044,0.0018734129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016729249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020731186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26203284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010358948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081186777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7094747997","doi":"","title":"Words Containing Canadian Province &amp; Territory Abbreviations","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons @ Butler University (Butler University)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Set (abstract data type); Word (group theory); Word list","score_opus":0.03065416132924436,"score_gpt":0.20171799694101986,"score_spread":0.1710638356117755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7094747997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043115567,0.0002200266,0.017343633,0.017021123,0.0014712284,0.0016067426,0.0038367282,0.000635516,0.91474944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91431016,0.00020455009,0.000098758384,0.0004948205,0.0004819085,2.0710554e-7,0.00028501594,0.000051864135,0.08407271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536043,0.00049987895,0.00042144998,0.0012666004,0.0008281495,0.0016234688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506134,0.00034644763,0.00038853788,0.00076933415,0.0004459988,0.002988368],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024467404,0.00071338576,0.0008298615,0.00093510555,0.0040756096,0.00073717866,0.0026320638,0.00064287096,0.0015284964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012082654,0.0009600707,0.00064393255,0.002641933,0.010543414,0.0041466244,0.0007842393,0.0010366131,0.0011236682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057355355,0.0005272656,0.04765274,0.00012510453,0.0009009533,0.0025424869,0.050570503,0.00015208748,0.000021335753,0.8506637,0.0409069,0.00536332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014983944,0.00020549702,0.00086400483,0.00010538955,0.00029326565,0.000004185061,0.03948025,0.000106898064,0.0000050560475,0.0002445174,0.95603406,0.001158461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058112517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46231633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91512716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002891792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045369933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096285642","doi":"","title":"Campaign Finances: An Introductory Essay","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Constitution; Newspaper; State (computer science); Power (physics); Supreme court; House of Representatives","score_opus":0.035747275318607406,"score_gpt":0.26854937713354554,"score_spread":0.23280210181493813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096285642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03501195,0.0006386857,0.009362323,0.0027411755,0.001825461,0.00021842061,0.000003510261,0.00036676013,0.9498317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85834855,0.00021843122,0.0005076303,0.00042141962,0.0017667197,0.000005598868,0.0000013765074,0.000006825369,0.13872343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905145,0.0001134292,0.000107025335,0.00020673889,0.00024178276,0.00027957096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995494,0.00004059515,0.000029920539,0.00021411748,0.000047350874,0.000118610005],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034778772,0.00006753973,0.000098853336,0.000026961388,0.00044641865,0.000066317734,0.00026344025,0.000071155344,0.009292725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052899955,0.00005102334,0.00003645843,0.00015705728,0.0042935936,0.000399155,0.000012297276,0.00006471118,0.0004928984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011095316,0.000070321425,0.0006127035,0.0000016226312,0.0000033750089,0.0000028538382,0.0201432,0.0000020189516,0.000020415824,0.93587506,0.03494566,0.008321637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014797726,0.000042957847,0.00012792644,0.0000029052353,0.000005219657,4.7603956e-7,0.0030590228,0.00008987436,0.000075696036,0.019252483,0.97703236,0.00016307406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058449333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001982574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9420867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056060468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046105444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097314672","doi":"","title":"An Open Letter to the Kimble County Commissioners Court and the Citizens of Kimble","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liberian dollar; Taxpayer; State (computer science); Asset (computer security); Residence; Downtown","score_opus":0.019270631456432766,"score_gpt":0.30818252849779,"score_spread":0.2889118970413572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097314672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12379241,0.00004363059,0.0038919467,0.24274333,0.0013201806,0.0016213263,0.000025326517,0.000071349954,0.6264905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726145,0.000021596597,0.00042629804,0.0084267855,0.0004343881,0.000015546517,0.0000014011014,0.0000068016484,0.018052638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990872,0.00015978153,0.00012879215,0.00014209477,0.00028316144,0.00019893712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991933,0.00018737861,0.000046609388,0.00035957305,0.00008219122,0.00013095106],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001769617,0.00006765007,0.00013720128,0.000012788297,0.00086016784,0.00024410093,0.00094614876,0.000068993235,0.00076914864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006399767,0.000028743345,0.00002773615,0.000111417256,0.0063710525,0.0001727681,0.00012596264,0.00013745582,0.00002079871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026668045,0.000024405703,0.00051647867,0.0000010935871,0.000008427483,4.1426497e-7,0.009314268,0.000001709001,0.0006022346,0.7600468,0.2290175,0.0004400253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055155734,0.00002925455,0.00034825594,0.0000036894637,0.000013163822,6.462776e-7,0.0030979996,0.00007645191,0.00027717743,0.015816104,0.97970045,0.000085261825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077577448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012831048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8488221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000085401025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000073649026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100904842","doi":"","title":"Vital Signs: Health Insurance Coverage and Health Care Utilization —","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"National Health Interview Survey; Quarter (Canadian coin); Health insurance; Poverty; Health care; Poverty level; Medical Expenditure Panel Survey; Medical care","score_opus":0.037276005058204865,"score_gpt":0.3262877033292754,"score_spread":0.28901169827107054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100904842","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11514479,0.02829474,0.44328728,0.033665318,0.0021402345,0.0026426516,0.00021360326,0.0009609107,0.37365046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951298,0.00085569423,0.000200531,0.0013922094,0.00026236643,0.000003428406,0.000028338301,0.0000058721234,0.0021217368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990789,0.00010054067,0.00016264967,0.00017039508,0.00021994044,0.00026756295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996718,0.000023596216,0.00007137978,0.00007764251,0.000046579957,0.00010897613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027644596,0.000065578606,0.00012761987,0.000025706282,0.0007111663,0.00006966512,0.00006758298,0.000045645123,0.00006190785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007693507,0.000055155997,0.00002113393,0.0001481633,0.0011762338,0.00021101344,0.000010852771,0.000042504245,0.000009324021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035427447,0.000035743655,0.022562826,0.000034417895,0.0000021395692,8.8156577e-7,0.013020911,0.000009109352,0.000006117749,0.93647367,0.009123075,0.01872759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026273998,0.00087154494,0.07918354,0.000109522356,0.000005409678,0.000003882183,0.02346704,0.000079481586,0.0001618732,0.059723128,0.83288056,0.00088664703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016911276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030043978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87998503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014926663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030458003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98963517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7110555763","doi":"","title":"The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: A Comparative Constitutional Analysis of Whistleblowing Speech, the Government's Managerial Domain, and the Imperatives of Democratic Self-Government","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Doctrine; Public interest; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Praise; Warren Court","score_opus":0.007498316359374868,"score_gpt":0.24803756512005987,"score_spread":0.240539248760685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7110555763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59908867,0.035118584,0.008465218,0.062234197,0.00361981,0.009471957,0.0008395957,0.00006789116,0.2810941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939172,0.0025509882,0.00012393396,0.0008305947,0.00027336742,0.00009659387,0.0000026762777,0.000008371635,0.0021962577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922787,0.0034047358,0.0011045757,0.0005568507,0.0021142259,0.0005409156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904821,0.0074929036,0.00082772307,0.00088457327,0.00019202272,0.00012066642],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006074809,0.00044028024,0.0010650416,0.000027685814,0.006892882,0.000770359,0.0013653177,0.00015021487,0.00014988994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038207116,0.00016398412,0.0005753116,0.0011985663,0.10008656,0.0003521151,0.00057366805,0.0005474261,0.0000035377896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007366499,0.000102795224,0.001571396,0.000024168497,0.0054232823,0.000002075687,0.022530546,0.00008382783,0.00007099365,0.96849555,0.0007136511,0.00024508376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025219288,0.00036345306,0.0084473165,0.0004901451,0.023320287,0.000013492825,0.37142894,0.01245533,0.0018289114,0.40956503,0.14557616,0.0012916607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011312775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077011306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5589305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002948465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037214617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112587785","doi":"","title":"The Quaestor Quarterly July 2007","year":2007,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"RIT Scholar Works (Rochester Institute of Technology)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Audit; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Payment","score_opus":0.013888849701712752,"score_gpt":0.269829178969635,"score_spread":0.2559403292679222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112587785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5328583,0.09777991,0.18267241,0.0384556,0.057509158,0.0061316728,0.00007740725,0.0027838657,0.08173166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97907597,0.003710326,0.0068603503,0.00035042447,0.0018533038,0.000048758386,0.00000791248,0.00008716896,0.008005788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932292,0.00019157262,0.0018309001,0.0011712047,0.0013870731,0.0021900653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99547154,0.00026710334,0.0009891557,0.002064482,0.0007181129,0.0004895972],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006596028,0.0007459178,0.00093781104,0.0007282244,0.0044986806,0.0007318766,0.003975507,0.0026783294,0.000094993244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007708691,0.0005906109,0.0005546298,0.003121972,0.063536726,0.0025516744,0.00031319467,0.0036172317,0.00066586485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018501653,0.00047677648,0.0014116513,0.00006290998,0.00029072774,0.00012878269,0.004865277,0.0000035586968,0.0005307715,0.6360041,0.0038663857,0.35217407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012327146,0.0005071137,0.0005128402,0.0005822653,0.00018952941,0.000034167013,0.0074050226,0.000007819728,0.0012272182,0.031508125,0.95600563,0.000787533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009146238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010716605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95213926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043588344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060613226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115033458","doi":"","title":"Balancing State Secrecy and Freedom of Expression in the Context of Security and Intelligence Whistleblowing","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; National security; Judicial review; Scrutiny; Public interest; Judicial deference; Secrecy; Accountability; Statutory law; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.026461704040585468,"score_gpt":0.29655900625853715,"score_spread":0.2700973022179517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115033458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5828459,0.05470836,0.0004086777,0.00025539708,0.0023493122,0.006680368,0.32281414,0.00008415122,0.029853674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988443,0.000910095,0.000020749701,0.00003173483,0.000071567396,0.000055488872,0.010169515,0.000011225172,0.00028662768],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975556,0.00038912822,0.00074548105,0.0004662074,0.00052857876,0.0003149836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758303,0.0011495118,0.00059702713,0.00026471863,0.00032396623,0.000081759776],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005201011,0.00028501963,0.0006068727,0.0001555974,0.0003458246,0.000099240904,0.0005376559,0.00034133898,0.005389149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013276765,0.00021899598,0.00010983636,0.0004847923,0.00074428075,0.00030873172,0.00011991952,0.0004214192,0.0000044898134],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001675112,0.00018353762,0.0011259984,0.006727697,0.000064820895,0.000017855944,0.95403236,0.00002090371,0.00064964715,0.0078338,0.0037587397,0.02541713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001604229,0.00043463614,0.0045750136,0.1088371,0.0001980519,0.000003870045,0.81161714,0.0044731447,0.025194798,0.024392074,0.01706997,0.0015999604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009651188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00448211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40559706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003820344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031714627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99552006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116879856","doi":"10.5287/ora-qa5qazpjr","title":"Democracy, press independence, and constitutional structure: the crisis of journalism and the checking function of the press","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Function (biology); Context (archaeology); Journalism; Constitutional law; Constitution","score_opus":0.023443667901570864,"score_gpt":0.2606367119637655,"score_spread":0.2371930440621946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116879856","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85096425,0.0018928897,0.01658173,0.0047685304,0.0012531833,0.0041904273,0.0013465745,0.00004587203,0.11895653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98215246,0.0076592234,0.00018807157,0.0000106013285,0.00007405919,3.1092094e-7,0.00004779307,0.000008607764,0.009858845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962878,0.0012994148,0.00020082788,0.00034215034,0.0014801202,0.0003896666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971027,0.0008439717,0.0005794121,0.00038283598,0.00094128004,0.00014980565],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014150133,0.00018695739,0.0004076733,0.00025040045,0.003465877,0.00007169626,0.0015782015,0.00027926386,0.00013532513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016801605,0.00012929137,0.00021590474,0.000434377,0.04605994,0.0005981368,0.0005703072,0.0010477129,2.0614887e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011763589,0.000044988243,0.0018458895,0.000172957,0.00032325333,0.0000055761834,0.028203279,0.00002556485,0.00015193126,0.9632758,0.0028361483,0.0019382474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061711404,0.0003337986,0.04616252,0.00067833596,0.001152668,0.000015978303,0.4236058,0.00081965694,0.00031647575,0.22599685,0.2940673,0.0006794963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008228892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0080205435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73727894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008976189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007378226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128676484","doi":"10.26180/4657540","title":"Open' justice, the courts and the media","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Principal (computer security); Statutory law; Work (physics); Common law; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.02448905780778422,"score_gpt":0.27693669730251064,"score_spread":0.25244763949472643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128676484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08215039,0.0015457588,0.00037545388,0.008451501,0.008219667,0.0024694502,0.00015474952,0.00004922764,0.8965838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7254894,0.008323742,0.000014180482,0.00016601596,0.0006504827,0.0000016293643,0.00007006258,0.000014806548,0.26526973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753785,0.00068122166,0.0001815149,0.0005318175,0.0006486167,0.00041896538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971783,0.0010304515,0.0005819385,0.000722022,0.00028400356,0.00020326894],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015762653,0.00029250392,0.00046036913,0.000051381983,0.013239686,0.00087970647,0.0042431424,0.00041444713,0.00047273302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027401323,0.00017564451,0.00018305422,0.00013453206,0.03523592,0.0006952402,0.0005038336,0.0005193141,0.000068216046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000402616,0.000042432297,0.00013366457,0.000028473582,0.000116424046,0.000039661598,0.099402234,0.0000014718329,0.0000014516377,0.887297,0.008031521,0.004503089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031909866,0.000031693577,0.005650085,0.00010079017,0.0020014753,0.0000019225922,0.17659216,0.0001723747,0.000007790932,0.036837578,0.7749071,0.0005060231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00811138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015933149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8504594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110069166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005707873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128677994","doi":"10.26180/4657540.v1","title":"Open' justice, the courts and the media","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Principal (computer security); Statutory law; Work (physics); Common law; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.02448905780778422,"score_gpt":0.27693669730251064,"score_spread":0.25244763949472643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128677994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08215039,0.0015457588,0.00037545388,0.008451501,0.008219667,0.0024694502,0.00015474952,0.00004922764,0.8965838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7254894,0.008323742,0.000014180482,0.00016601596,0.0006504827,0.0000016293643,0.00007006258,0.000014806548,0.26526973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753785,0.00068122166,0.0001815149,0.0005318175,0.0006486167,0.00041896538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971783,0.0010304515,0.0005819385,0.000722022,0.00028400356,0.00020326894],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015762653,0.00029250392,0.00046036913,0.000051381983,0.013239686,0.00087970647,0.0042431424,0.00041444713,0.00047273302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027401323,0.00017564451,0.00018305422,0.00013453206,0.03523592,0.0006952402,0.0005038336,0.0005193141,0.000068216046],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000402616,0.000042432297,0.00013366457,0.000028473582,0.000116424046,0.000039661598,0.099402234,0.0000014718329,0.0000014516377,0.887297,0.008031521,0.004503089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031909866,0.000031693577,0.005650085,0.00010079017,0.0020014753,0.0000019225922,0.17659216,0.0001723747,0.000007790932,0.036837578,0.7749071,0.0005060231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00811138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015933149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8504594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110069166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005707873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132858015","doi":"10.1146/annurev-polisci-010814-104523&gt","title":"Campaign Finance and American Democracy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Campaign finance; Politics; Democracy; Democratic governance; Corporate governance; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Public finance","score_opus":0.039012018117604894,"score_gpt":0.35264680224796346,"score_spread":0.31363478413035856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132858015","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.750379,0.0007492075,0.011154319,0.014320872,0.0005184416,0.0002140414,0.00000186535,0.00017398468,0.22248821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685265,0.0001890011,0.001021298,0.00021669103,0.00026254694,0.0000026656612,4.1470344e-7,0.0000052086275,0.029775705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937975,0.000068645844,0.00005077531,0.00012426,0.00017315232,0.0002034039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996208,0.000049494723,0.000043343887,0.00010515463,0.000045450844,0.00013574747],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002756451,0.00005164728,0.00009565517,0.00001555223,0.00022773995,0.000040862156,0.00010733104,0.000026857075,0.000031795174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090435904,0.000043302847,0.000015228387,0.00016261965,0.005420278,0.00010043214,0.00002097675,0.000048740123,0.00006861738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015254211,0.000031719755,0.009556218,0.0000027222952,0.0000072112744,0.0000126024315,0.14307676,0.00000478609,0.000024467185,0.79112667,0.03905893,0.01708263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002589203,0.00007092343,0.0011396235,0.0000063085427,0.000007961579,0.0000015687131,0.031327575,0.00004216278,0.000050691055,0.024601735,0.94232804,0.00016451288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032628116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010551165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9032691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036726866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110880435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132888747","doi":"","title":"Legal Systems Involvement and Mental Health: The Challenges for Young People Engaged in the Family Law and Criminal Justice Systems","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Law Foundation of British Columbia; UNICEF","keywords":"Mental health; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Mental health law; Criminal law; Welfare; Legal psychology; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.07298430503607135,"score_gpt":0.3567687836838811,"score_spread":0.28378447864780976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132888747","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25362808,0.5995552,0.0014701121,0.02148344,0.025662174,0.024047755,0.00030437883,0.00013542493,0.07371341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9572224,0.03526121,0.000015436377,0.00033958876,0.00083911006,0.0007813446,0.00011190576,0.000026638872,0.0054023755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937302,0.0031907044,0.00070102466,0.0007443646,0.0008772116,0.0007564978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967426,0.00203642,0.00052202446,0.0003648659,0.00017755802,0.00015651566],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007499243,0.00047921002,0.00077024876,0.00010446733,0.0062876684,0.0009246483,0.00060189306,0.00034159195,0.0000024552667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011760821,0.0003045756,0.00011194875,0.00027087706,0.002178151,0.00024770974,0.00006425596,0.000864722,0.0000015945882],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007378755,0.00006265163,0.00001247765,0.003981604,0.000049290662,0.0000011585947,0.4766853,0.0000076306405,0.00001243472,0.51838803,0.0005828644,0.00014276299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087911746,0.0003138672,0.00030914636,0.00097480917,0.00040812592,0.000006758771,0.9496238,0.0011847486,0.0000020455734,0.00019323998,0.04577386,0.00033045997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.094923094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19442403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7035943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002509752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005193398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132890913","doi":"","title":"Criminal Then and Now: A Note on Section 156 of the Criminal Code","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Criminal code; Permission; Code (set theory); Criminal law; Penal code","score_opus":0.058335151661670345,"score_gpt":0.3396673510370189,"score_spread":0.28133219937534854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132890913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91153914,0.000081048776,0.0032928234,0.020908823,0.00056639314,0.00023664505,0.00000656844,0.000059054302,0.06330953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963298,0.00003827112,0.00008776794,0.00056151533,0.0004925537,0.0000018895432,2.869583e-7,0.0000049532323,0.0024829698],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999348,0.00009201815,0.00006845315,0.00012586983,0.00023727324,0.00012840527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996871,0.00006486409,0.00005215489,0.00009149916,0.000034373003,0.00007005353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015777204,0.000056349352,0.00008515437,0.000010724105,0.00026686257,0.000025394658,0.00013851719,0.000052924905,0.00009270521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000079073245,0.00003642163,0.00004031402,0.00009896534,0.0018909895,0.000049149345,0.000029484794,0.00009820007,0.000014816145],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016141316,0.000063273204,0.0010347795,0.000060711744,0.000017267315,0.0000040019036,0.60201585,0.000022017055,0.0044800793,0.38212594,0.007100673,0.002913979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023702737,0.0014368834,0.019003782,0.000187275,0.0005546046,0.000010575127,0.2054634,0.0015028454,0.027154513,0.01568812,0.7257756,0.00085211307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073715195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094263244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71867496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022834332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058924128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69674295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135838408","doi":"","title":"‘The Constitution is designed to survive, and remain in force, in extraordinary times’: the Boumediene v. Bush decision","year":2009,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Legislation; Legislature; Government (linguistics); Supreme court","score_opus":0.030294393549856184,"score_gpt":0.2944840660518686,"score_spread":0.2641896725020124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135838408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.596739,0.013091391,0.01259483,0.026381182,0.00031987397,0.0053138104,0.00013852678,0.000040265168,0.3453811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70001096,0.003338088,0.00020071717,0.000066838096,0.00002676113,1.8850821e-7,0.0000059173867,0.00000742685,0.29634312],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99358094,0.0027590638,0.00036453927,0.0006834374,0.0015597822,0.001052238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951501,0.0027868503,0.00026903566,0.00082649995,0.00057476317,0.00039277514],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008953753,0.00028311767,0.000606942,0.00037021065,0.004941694,0.0001302244,0.0026003441,0.0003152332,0.040994707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039341982,0.00022715419,0.00020641275,0.002668582,0.016942674,0.0008168671,0.0010022144,0.0006394234,0.0060684388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038121236,0.00027214544,0.00006325377,0.000038492133,0.00010075483,0.00036029043,0.05023966,0.00014788022,0.0017865659,0.036516402,0.88471144,0.021950968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003073676,0.00091890234,0.018991781,0.00043644485,0.00009382068,0.000008968385,0.09200614,0.00064335205,0.00041636077,0.0013343971,0.88164616,0.00042999402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061876564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0213136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10327194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079189084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009473309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162000238","doi":"10.82308/50162","title":"The necessity of a broadened, cost-effective, and widely recognized common law invasion of privacy tort in technocentric Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Common law; Privacy laws of the United States; Information privacy; Privacy law; Privacy by Design; Appeal; Legislature; Privacy policy; Personally identifiable information","score_opus":0.011616244235739955,"score_gpt":0.2775418193492786,"score_spread":0.2659255751135386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162000238","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90102977,0.0014690713,0.00009382372,0.0005780822,0.00095737004,0.0039620157,0.000050763858,0.000038820825,0.0918203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993743,0.0012720864,0.000024922707,0.00003257058,0.00004113192,0.00007239572,0.000031622378,0.000011094015,0.0047711893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983978,0.00023064617,0.00040792802,0.00023320263,0.00048619328,0.0002441817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983377,0.00075895246,0.00040273115,0.00021437209,0.00021071895,0.000075548145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067980425,0.00014938522,0.00041030624,0.000070471164,0.00036504935,0.00002703187,0.0003955885,0.0002694849,0.000037719554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024271518,0.00008802023,0.000052074764,0.00032550312,0.0018099862,0.0001419285,0.000039858634,0.00015372931,5.558466e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010026933,0.000235029,0.068047605,0.00046765435,0.00014088424,0.000014264467,0.008272412,2.505934e-7,0.0012411559,0.58824795,0.004352519,0.32797757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015226117,0.0006448535,0.15178694,0.005534257,0.0006177361,0.000005362362,0.04338863,0.000045042427,0.13548142,0.2749308,0.36905122,0.0032876353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.831893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99389815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3646987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023615365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008271884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66689694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162034970","doi":"10.82308/46851","title":"Balancing freedom of the press and the right to privacy : lessons for China","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right to privacy; Freedom of information; The Right to Privacy; Privilege (computing); China; Autonomy; Balance (ability); Freedom of the press","score_opus":0.012487501618264632,"score_gpt":0.2889798617158052,"score_spread":0.2764923600975406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162034970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05787338,0.0016144555,0.015936749,0.017030891,0.00592238,0.007161447,0.00021492012,0.00013483872,0.8941109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7563923,0.00009929777,0.00036366697,0.00008237174,0.00080948614,0.00013723166,0.000052689855,0.000022994747,0.24203998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988553,0.00011521216,0.00023616504,0.00021839533,0.00034145938,0.00023345006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990856,0.00029023917,0.000187567,0.00027727932,0.00011037872,0.000048928912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005541008,0.00013770281,0.0002713051,0.000025467858,0.00084146217,0.00009776941,0.00060716935,0.00017563933,0.000045991834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018169479,0.00006224791,0.000153233,0.000118716074,0.0021342123,0.00007520897,0.000035678146,0.00011119036,0.0000010107822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041048323,0.000018735076,0.000049865837,0.000042470452,0.000023425346,8.772968e-8,0.022287035,0.000009805311,0.000031712163,0.96303236,0.013846791,0.0006166721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029812858,0.00006927396,0.016244648,0.00037180018,0.0004803607,6.7560256e-7,0.009162085,0.00032310025,0.003071769,0.21577363,0.75076383,0.00075754855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011584993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04981451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7472587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028020235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013255945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99499696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W74659616","doi":"10.1177/009885881303900202","title":"Commercial Speech Law and Tobacco Marketing: A Comparative Discussion of the United States and Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Commercial speech; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Tobacco industry; Statement (logic); Political science; First amendment; Legislation; Constitutional amendment; Tobacco control; Supreme court; Medicine; Public health","score_opus":0.01775470523960748,"score_gpt":0.284094942793462,"score_spread":0.2663402375538545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W74659616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96828586,0.00014029288,0.00003291488,0.024555549,0.00021052573,0.00011700642,0.0000040877676,0.0000026172806,0.006651141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99704826,0.00023016741,0.00008614888,0.0022524965,0.00023369378,5.8898564e-7,0.0000011838468,0.0000039852707,0.00014349082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985502,0.0004573614,0.0003088202,0.00007245267,0.0004491109,0.00016210403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985776,0.00047728352,0.0004457382,0.000080469385,0.00022511509,0.00019379723],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006971776,0.00008426959,0.000360351,0.00002748786,0.00030417624,0.000017183038,0.00017886722,0.000017613867,0.000090364236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086777545,0.000035946676,0.000023074943,0.00019405632,0.018750453,0.00010934186,0.000026923766,0.00015666577,1.4571026e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007278237,0.00023672638,0.20092411,0.00005856676,0.0004691075,0.0000687145,0.21587053,0.000017474213,0.0011452498,0.4480462,0.07767265,0.05476285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003328651,0.0016056492,0.08648717,0.0010906467,0.00028732058,0.000109946515,0.28674626,0.000072172006,0.00035164738,0.0070114913,0.61246526,0.00044379587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88610655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7314528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5347926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004672598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014474428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9839199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W80513769","doi":"10.15173/mjc.v2i0.226","title":"Protecting Information Rights in the Liberal-Democratic State","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The McMaster Journal of Communication","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Political science; State (computer science); Law and economics; Liberal democracy; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02014968724793871,"score_gpt":0.27744253154815673,"score_spread":0.25729284430021804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W80513769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6134445,0.0012308086,0.030278934,0.14828841,0.00037292155,0.001840409,0.000002007405,0.00005288968,0.20448911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977352,0.0001324167,0.0008054073,0.0004929665,0.0001494917,0.0000062373383,6.7102025e-7,0.0000021005112,0.0006755322],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978231,0.0012429212,0.00043155643,0.00002514332,0.00034854625,0.00012870703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871653,0.0003560308,0.00046129103,0.0003001716,0.00014131406,0.000024659674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044202227,0.000053407184,0.00008870791,0.000058166162,0.0007888655,0.00018400526,0.0011356376,0.000031015443,0.000040717026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013007353,0.000026232685,0.000044304637,0.00019203784,0.00093438843,0.0015470153,0.00004750782,0.0004001139,0.000022594751],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000921499,0.00013221957,0.0003824097,0.0000098190985,0.000036485235,8.015955e-7,0.6983637,0.001086352,0.00005821703,0.13475595,0.004764495,0.16031736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015049229,0.00013259344,0.002907567,0.00024724618,0.000047443606,0.000047493042,0.017301539,0.0022273832,0.0003057684,0.5449072,0.43014392,0.00022690502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010571898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007155792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6810622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069317204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004769041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6067395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W852665359","doi":"","title":"More than You Wanted to Know: The Failure of Mandated Disclosure, by Omri Ben-Shahar & Carl E. Schneider","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.020293355217299438,"score_gpt":0.2795723012937092,"score_spread":0.2592789460764098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W852665359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07027588,0.006592347,0.014305662,0.098116644,0.004581493,0.001763603,0.00059636444,0.00035864225,0.80340934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99409854,0.00016789067,0.00047530598,0.00034921817,0.0008080196,0.000006964536,0.000016322092,0.000030236988,0.004047514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972168,0.0003627773,0.00045773547,0.000262268,0.0010929761,0.0006074088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981418,0.00006994115,0.00026734875,0.00035164473,0.0005410318,0.0006281864],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014415774,0.00021989427,0.0003428879,0.00005706527,0.0011796943,0.00030230265,0.00095411774,0.00019197568,0.00031581952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013351422,0.00013368523,0.00018282335,0.0003694736,0.0034328562,0.00048464106,0.000107005275,0.0004770118,0.000070694914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007297341,0.00011829135,0.002535863,0.0000072731777,0.00012410882,0.000032445383,0.0125744175,0.000032537057,0.0006303717,0.8642126,0.11895283,0.0007062872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017436347,0.00025760752,0.00026955674,0.00016467377,0.00015113066,0.00007567462,0.020145832,0.00004015589,0.0018563117,0.067330204,0.9074436,0.00052164675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025079114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14554383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92382264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012474445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028582057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W938569533","doi":"","title":"Rethinking Baker: A Critical Race Feminist Theory of Disability","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Immigration; Appeal; Supreme court; Poverty; Sociology; Political science; Critical race theory; Law; Duty; Criminology; Gender studies; Racism","score_opus":0.0759723442374994,"score_gpt":0.3736639926635501,"score_spread":0.29769164842605067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W938569533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015928614,0.2401771,0.0006188568,0.003417452,0.0012004876,0.00088509504,0.00005691216,0.00008420376,0.751967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96638197,0.032230116,0.00012638167,0.0008349386,0.00027093705,0.000017443132,0.00001238243,0.000011916088,0.00011389989],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785125,0.0004030316,0.000600766,0.00025315915,0.0005858666,0.00030591156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869764,0.00025994814,0.00020184965,0.00035855378,0.00021446984,0.000267512],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045174235,0.00014792518,0.00057257485,0.000008561201,0.00027604325,0.000026927508,0.00030096492,0.000092259084,0.00006593398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036097574,0.000096452386,0.00016833136,0.00015099031,0.021910159,0.00024131635,0.00009722618,0.00018840148,0.00000669179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016166701,0.0001343554,0.00013325123,0.0036479793,0.000010247911,5.217511e-7,0.0029456243,6.5813754e-9,8.5241305e-7,0.9811239,0.00019553423,0.011791556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001889191,0.000066688124,0.000009343089,0.003534412,0.0000673856,0.0000017993628,0.00042795503,9.903725e-7,0.000026208436,0.2651578,0.7303914,0.00012708711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074658555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007326653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96478915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001133134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011936352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98075163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W990652426","doi":"","title":"Are Wedding Bells Ringing for Same-Sex Marriages? The Legal Trends and Social Perspectives of Europe, Canada and the United States","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Law Reform","topic":"Law, Rights, and Freedoms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ringing; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.018016383269850382,"score_gpt":0.2519407985929728,"score_spread":0.23392441532312241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W990652426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8153719,0.0014242793,0.0011954356,0.033702064,0.0006615417,0.00029736094,0.00007164418,0.000025284846,0.1472505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759316,0.00027555163,0.00007783368,0.0003218795,0.0005480656,3.3710904e-7,0.0000010745233,0.00001592627,0.0011661865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881107,0.0003054467,0.0002905899,0.00009225044,0.00028914562,0.00021149722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901766,0.00014079158,0.00048988743,0.00006883905,0.00021278638,0.000070026515],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018288485,0.000097065145,0.00020189835,0.00005506427,0.0011150459,0.00012708962,0.0002699468,0.000014089038,0.000008270402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075977674,0.000047358808,0.000066454886,0.00018066764,0.0040413276,0.00019537468,0.000048564987,0.00018102527,1.4689603e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014039566,0.000018797862,0.00010359272,0.0000146263965,0.000109189474,0.0000563581,0.13117015,0.00007113056,0.000019763758,0.8660687,0.00020525801,0.0020219872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053349845,0.00023972293,0.003734518,0.0001590631,0.00016453181,0.00007887151,0.15382344,0.000042796528,0.00014525285,0.0035332844,0.83244854,0.0002949755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06904463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11979747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8625355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013753746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011071107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}