{"meta":{"query_hash":"66de1b1fa8e8","filters":{"topic":"Law in Society and Culture"},"cohort_total":1665,"direct_labels_cover":3,"predictions_cover":1665,"exported":1665,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/66de1b1fa8e8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Law+in+Society+and+Culture"},"results":[{"id":"W10830698","doi":"10.21991/c9bh3c","title":"DISABLING IMAGES AND THE DANGERS OF PUBLIC PERCEPTION: A COMMENTARY ON THE MEDIA’S \"COVERAGE\" OF THE LATIMER CASE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Media coverage; Computer science; Psychology; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.04566106157659506,"score_gpt":0.26435581410797127,"score_spread":0.2186947525313762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10830698","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020339491,0.0060976483,0.00024011738,0.9596151,0.0078612175,0.000010484447,0.00003329917,0.000014982199,0.02409322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08373612,0.0041399235,0.00029278587,0.86391336,0.032619808,0.00013497667,0.000027075568,0.00013148728,0.015004539],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716832,0.011932828,0.0016999115,0.0025983346,0.0069146343,0.005171098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8791532,0.10575397,0.0043074214,0.0019220981,0.006580547,0.0022827592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020743264,0.0013974758,0.0024446747,0.0036950447,0.0299498,0.02125201,0.0089029055,0.13065532,0.008999265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08898503,0.0015832967,0.0026896913,0.0029113228,0.055772733,0.019934848,0.015871832,0.0820005,0.0015610728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012692813,0.000048913316,0.00027939197,0.00045609905,0.000034649227,0.0011076566,0.03779349,0.000110712164,0.0003372863,0.3590557,0.59152627,0.009122799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011360211,0.00003824538,0.0010198121,0.0028594437,0.00010893442,0.00040626802,0.021715,0.00018661603,0.0009347655,0.044889648,0.92757297,0.000154692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06928689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0688619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13065532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015758552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015686559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1377672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W110910639","doi":"","title":"Unmasking Scientific Controversies: Forensic DNA Analysis in Canadian Legal Cases of Sexual Assault","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Forensic science; Criminology; Forensic genetics; Psychology; Political science; Law; Medicine; Biology; Medical emergency; Genetics; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Microsatellite","score_opus":0.017510941578438338,"score_gpt":0.27917308595513013,"score_spread":0.2616621443766918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W110910639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5399239,0.038821314,0.002655099,0.32475302,0.0016481404,0.0003019835,0.0005193439,0.000031374526,0.09134586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94401413,0.020199478,0.003011186,0.025223654,0.0004947582,0.000076360484,0.00017898697,0.000022639962,0.0067788917],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97411376,0.0060309046,0.0013490433,0.0012849363,0.0118930265,0.0053284047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9244386,0.03576767,0.0056240545,0.0016247882,0.029759,0.0027860198],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0400331,0.0004979648,0.0007747635,0.013212902,0.028485226,0.012108391,0.0064096977,0.009025596,0.0026678576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11164827,0.0008457067,0.0006016791,0.012043954,0.021921657,0.0034782572,0.004656341,0.0066851014,0.0001769195],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003415857,0.00020209988,0.1184277,0.0018273444,0.00026164792,0.0073264292,0.3644422,0.0010642061,0.004977658,0.16371316,0.0841507,0.2532653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007988065,0.00007899219,0.19320086,0.0034298215,0.0005229272,0.002830078,0.4742315,0.0015499194,0.0041447883,0.03652825,0.28303534,0.00036765062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9865296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97151476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10676783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26385438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77465844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1127643288","doi":"10.71781/1780","title":"La diffamation sur Internet : actualiser la responsabilité en droit civil et en common law au Canada","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Bell Canada Enterprises; York University","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Law; The Internet; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Public law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.015883183598324017,"score_gpt":0.30742826376369853,"score_spread":0.2915450801653745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1127643288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76804334,0.0026699812,0.0019960501,0.022041159,0.00009255433,0.00010677378,0.00077257765,0.00004989942,0.20422761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9522087,0.0015249436,0.00066497346,0.0013034854,0.000013353004,0.000018110999,0.00011567127,0.000022807671,0.044128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631506,0.00043346803,0.00008053966,0.00031327203,0.0017434609,0.0011142773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99306315,0.00182794,0.0004118338,0.00022828241,0.0035797143,0.0008890437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022914438,0.00018526654,0.0002531402,0.0025093523,0.0143020535,0.0089552635,0.0011018515,0.0013025606,0.0084799975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008337481,0.00026512993,0.0002150954,0.0055242013,0.00803046,0.0029392822,0.0028380258,0.0024390926,0.00031255413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012592023,0.00009032249,0.098795675,0.00029151439,0.000039073344,0.0018308752,0.31642264,0.0013795317,0.002087729,0.4460879,0.02670317,0.10614568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015581372,0.000048145106,0.15826523,0.0006033036,0.00005716102,0.00027941432,0.38721588,0.0018276934,0.0014553156,0.011535417,0.43854606,0.00015070685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99379784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9968629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12977706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12977706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13668631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9416029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1134235165","doi":"","title":"Producing Legal Subjectives Through Online Media","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.012078483151422896,"score_gpt":0.27955307418668296,"score_spread":0.26747459103526006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1134235165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36112672,0.0008748285,0.10779822,0.009167944,0.00061593857,0.00023034893,0.0008318522,0.00071563665,0.5186385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92419046,0.0005317724,0.04015714,0.00046944752,0.00022998916,0.00011641509,0.00045935166,0.00032558342,0.033519745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586785,0.002460234,0.0002062087,0.000387412,0.00093672605,0.00014167745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96329415,0.022895906,0.0036814557,0.0053390167,0.0035476459,0.0012418332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064846096,0.00041467865,0.00024090733,0.002636661,0.0025008093,0.010273304,0.0006577098,0.0011128951,0.022049049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032976683,0.0004489995,0.0004196591,0.002038394,0.005586875,0.012902235,0.0070250384,0.0017755614,0.0018644594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020214757,0.00040644282,0.016960677,0.00045749248,0.000027125547,0.0005833538,0.10285129,0.0010648838,0.007938761,0.6544497,0.016598547,0.19845963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000931852,0.0003242501,0.018847428,0.00072821975,0.00007454075,0.0004080068,0.09842923,0.009714515,0.014323199,0.5704855,0.28646564,0.00010635467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009429663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002074084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022049049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012512422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015891857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0737614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W113662126","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1404","title":"Book Review: Women's Legal Strategies in Canada, by Radha Jhappan (ed)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.006415996431573907,"score_gpt":0.2431252335332063,"score_spread":0.2367092371016324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W113662126","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028183643,0.8957364,0.0000982628,0.057469055,0.024648063,0.000041235053,0.000707944,0.000039562252,0.020977668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0044547976,0.8195031,0.00034173127,0.023499718,0.013322274,0.00008483105,0.0009127837,0.00006116996,0.13781957],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856526,0.0001686573,0.00007008497,0.00009772163,0.0008899834,0.00020835754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359196,0.0011715442,0.00020210823,0.00008192541,0.004432357,0.000520182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015679663,0.0013531587,0.0018403594,0.006457154,0.004160051,0.005582061,0.0026140185,0.003880051,0.023590745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006688465,0.00066490273,0.00055010937,0.017537346,0.0021001466,0.0024787583,0.0011031122,0.002331087,0.0058603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003587482,0.0000033875344,0.00005769954,0.0002578027,0.0000029161433,0.000013483532,0.000059691614,0.000029281588,0.000009637018,0.00036967822,0.98385197,0.015340811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005808503,0.0000049493783,0.00095199863,0.0011339844,0.000015562991,0.00005530123,0.00032763163,0.000026097154,0.000022206126,0.00033235337,0.9971136,0.000010544283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86309546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9685494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13690454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029091671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07440395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27542156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1147521755","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511487354.007","title":"Dispositions, property identity, and laws of nature","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Identity (music); Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02724684442823432,"score_gpt":0.257442036621034,"score_spread":0.23019519219279966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1147521755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036179125,0.012179609,0.09613542,0.028238839,0.0004788878,0.00009176836,0.00030564,0.00012507652,0.82626563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9482998,0.005037273,0.02060634,0.001349661,0.00032402924,0.00018402193,0.00019816088,0.000043121076,0.023957698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970862,0.0017134174,0.00014154243,0.0004049927,0.00047597173,0.00017790312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979777,0.0011246102,0.00023226785,0.00036845758,0.00019475026,0.00010228644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030219147,0.00045072357,0.000410326,0.0021137563,0.0023731275,0.0063992837,0.0008680223,0.0022678464,0.006503583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047710976,0.0003487733,0.00036585444,0.0016425335,0.042451076,0.011161442,0.0032361462,0.0029191524,0.0006629195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013753096,0.0000018910345,0.00006448406,0.000007925431,6.645351e-7,0.0000072075777,0.00041358094,0.000045331755,0.000013893275,0.9979748,0.000236569,0.0012321831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002148992,0.0000032770029,0.00026618713,0.000023228758,0.0000012784994,0.000031508545,0.00060093583,0.0001887499,0.000034941935,0.9801056,0.0187392,0.0000028724705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004917517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035464005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006503583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045492114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002110236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033006966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1150835208","doi":"","title":"Research guides: A-Z: Best Sources in Canadian Law by Topic: Entertainment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Entertainment; Political science","score_opus":0.07137550182164869,"score_gpt":0.36906267624322725,"score_spread":0.29768717442157855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1150835208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030367128,0.007310055,0.0015653049,0.026299482,0.0012614662,0.00093672,0.108029276,0.0019656199,0.8495954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01757487,0.009071281,0.0043236213,0.0025853396,0.00025038607,0.0005831083,0.019977499,0.0009483118,0.94468564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770606,0.00019246529,0.00015261558,0.00018082166,0.0013121745,0.0004558624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795052,0.002561887,0.00036308126,0.00034918613,0.014936074,0.002284634],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029008866,0.0010192824,0.00081464136,0.013680577,0.0117667755,0.012751447,0.0018373653,0.0027887365,0.32339153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015966507,0.00077219337,0.00044255436,0.025436018,0.0017788919,0.0053456943,0.0022734099,0.0019198385,0.062151134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011662139,0.00001175049,0.0003532438,0.00020472035,0.0000014318562,0.0000116846595,0.0005288674,0.000033905453,0.000037150206,0.0035006793,0.96934634,0.02595851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013225368,0.000007404876,0.004802953,0.0005690814,0.000009641188,0.000013831901,0.003274998,0.00009663248,0.00014729482,0.0012172121,0.9898183,0.000029483806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96849984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32339153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054269817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16803291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9650999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1276931799","doi":"","title":"Juror Bias, Voir Dire, and the Judge-Jury Relationship","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Impartiality; Jury selection; Law; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Hung jury; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.11028732292088372,"score_gpt":0.34434029241295966,"score_spread":0.23405296949207594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1276931799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43664238,0.01475993,0.008726223,0.09323504,0.0008021475,0.000116782074,0.000059014437,0.000033033015,0.44562545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878535,0.0016835913,0.00056342257,0.0055182436,0.00014703258,0.000029412153,0.0000050955887,0.0000105863755,0.004189012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9674594,0.02258998,0.0010015591,0.0017007337,0.0047230306,0.0025254125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95066565,0.032788485,0.008263031,0.0018806293,0.0033764276,0.0030258584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02770197,0.00017252484,0.00053636025,0.0014200163,0.0077105695,0.0055005495,0.0010537304,0.0034367742,0.004947533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07760018,0.000340801,0.00023233722,0.001254147,0.02031123,0.0030736204,0.0037353386,0.0040315203,0.00050294277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072640614,0.00010197971,0.027686745,0.00011944452,0.00006086125,0.00048959826,0.02984606,0.00051440083,0.0003805276,0.9048208,0.005836401,0.030070694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010702053,0.00035744344,0.087618165,0.0011387106,0.00007837604,0.0012255206,0.04948791,0.0010784494,0.0010368311,0.689159,0.1685094,0.00020316058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009263417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01697081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02770197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004565505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008159439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1465038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W134071367","doi":"10.1007/978-94-010-0808-2_3","title":"Invisibility in Modern Legal Thought","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Law and philosophy library","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Invisibility; Natural (archaeology); Natural law; Law; Epistemology; Positivism; Wish; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; History; Physics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.026138919500310668,"score_gpt":0.24861577409372645,"score_spread":0.2224768545934158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W134071367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006356974,0.015672958,0.0139048705,0.015565574,0.00064800394,0.000023972501,0.000031752046,0.00007529916,0.9477205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5829209,0.017065426,0.005237916,0.0059552663,0.0033213005,0.00017798955,0.00006081439,0.00022706938,0.38503325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984647,0.00088131794,0.000050177325,0.00012024271,0.00036356377,0.00012004277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99725705,0.001959579,0.00010632239,0.00032847753,0.00025609392,0.00009256594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025776203,0.0004652044,0.0006953454,0.0023284669,0.004764947,0.009751871,0.0010583582,0.0031084116,0.009538469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046853744,0.0004982461,0.0003725654,0.0023869355,0.0306767,0.012428126,0.0028929284,0.008407093,0.0017341311],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010853933,0.000003187071,0.00000635665,0.000009562321,4.4422865e-7,0.000006773649,0.00074025977,0.000031203544,0.0000059901768,0.9962155,0.0015815772,0.0013979404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003036028,0.000002229042,0.000019093346,0.000034527882,0.0000013370956,0.000020340545,0.00023862942,0.000083972525,0.000021244743,0.965291,0.034282524,0.0000020210593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002799682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025341385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009751871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055545927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033590887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04030156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W142842520","doi":"","title":"The constitution of Canada and the official status of french in Alberta","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01026506046098623,"score_gpt":0.24872191026421236,"score_spread":0.23845684980322612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W142842520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11490808,0.14043973,0.00087681046,0.15438299,0.00472184,0.00017156322,0.0022559692,0.000104386556,0.58213854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78630704,0.036033038,0.0012431646,0.027948987,0.00082416006,0.0000889459,0.00074364437,0.00010151316,0.14670958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98109376,0.0022324435,0.0007388431,0.0011016345,0.008184479,0.0066488683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.970859,0.007202793,0.00087214954,0.0007114402,0.018361308,0.0019933567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011385295,0.0005533788,0.00084996904,0.0073085423,0.02262066,0.018618908,0.0029624389,0.006338006,0.006094783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033902116,0.00073960994,0.0005078495,0.009756699,0.008745922,0.0022104818,0.0026015404,0.0052688085,0.00038591144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022457738,0.000044540997,0.005974429,0.0006295312,0.00011368781,0.00063379074,0.011325954,0.0014292137,0.0005635756,0.7409995,0.1939622,0.044099044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042844447,0.000024569264,0.031931546,0.0009859568,0.0001380066,0.00007996424,0.007633018,0.00043355874,0.0005913214,0.013213449,0.9447781,0.00014764337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19307609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19307609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33134434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9359174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1428772967","doi":"","title":"DURA LEX SED LEX : une étude iconographique des portes du nouveau Palais de justice de Montréal","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Espace Sculpture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.010062745745432387,"score_gpt":0.2590728794544208,"score_spread":0.24901013370898842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1428772967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42302954,0.024066046,0.009021109,0.014859933,0.0007960509,0.00026812672,0.012442847,0.0003593284,0.515157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8237582,0.008019557,0.002147585,0.0006148461,0.00014555198,0.00015913445,0.00169472,0.0002999594,0.16316055],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991742,0.00023011913,0.000028538876,0.00014029509,0.00026773755,0.00015900699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989095,0.0005669873,0.000104600564,0.00005009494,0.00026245567,0.00010647114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070963125,0.00065934873,0.00036081957,0.0058790506,0.0074318154,0.006627346,0.0007575394,0.0007194987,0.018476536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026346142,0.0003593123,0.00020072646,0.011952327,0.004384982,0.0021748606,0.0018856261,0.0021295242,0.00084031344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011741409,0.00006529945,0.029797528,0.0008063194,0.000053868782,0.0018771604,0.4422092,0.0012083447,0.006602099,0.27297306,0.07299623,0.17129342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065808063,0.00002171226,0.055046413,0.00022387248,0.00001696627,0.0001934248,0.08495808,0.00025295187,0.000708278,0.0016036902,0.8569238,0.0000441987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9567963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9765845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04320371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0405589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025840323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29427683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W143340216","doi":"10.1023/a:1013177020492","title":"Empowering Victim Advocates: Organizing Against Anti-gay/lesbian Violence in Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Criminology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Mainstream; Queer; Gender studies; Sociology; Equity (law); Criminology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.055439548714850205,"score_gpt":0.33802479033633565,"score_spread":0.28258524162148546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W143340216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80433404,0.0025105646,0.0011888623,0.12660357,0.0005805529,0.0005006128,0.00023766416,0.00008499924,0.06395913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.941921,0.0013329448,0.0010365235,0.009620438,0.00005648623,0.00009571025,0.00006799052,0.00003750184,0.045831315],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99349785,0.0012659788,0.00009730356,0.0003673497,0.0009675977,0.003803876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861984,0.0012761361,0.0005491842,0.00014529904,0.002836928,0.008994072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034902173,0.00035549217,0.00038495462,0.0019187296,0.051056802,0.01068392,0.0035546164,0.004571805,0.007445331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009852493,0.00058191776,0.00037645426,0.0020328495,0.006315546,0.0017611771,0.005410958,0.0055540134,0.00036795926],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055089965,0.0012207315,0.16711223,0.0005376133,0.00014543245,0.0041125203,0.3364724,0.0025717583,0.0037786344,0.098692566,0.16491541,0.21988983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001097078,0.0002163328,0.090873435,0.00031919513,0.00014305046,0.0003725008,0.5812852,0.0016700793,0.0020179525,0.0058158003,0.3170043,0.00017255507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99313015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99842834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13725933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13725933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40666154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99589086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W143722814","doi":"","title":"The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography [Introduction]","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Empirical legal studies; Cultural geography; Critical geography; Legal realism; Strategic geography; Legal profession; Legal research; Law; Historical geography; Legal history; Scholarship; Social geography; Geography; Human geography; Political science; Sociology; Economic geography","score_opus":0.005120007745826258,"score_gpt":0.2544023365302845,"score_spread":0.24928232878445822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W143722814","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005554374,0.17579873,0.011270775,0.3044864,0.028432608,0.00009808919,0.00054566463,0.0005056487,0.47330767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26215038,0.29590398,0.016822953,0.048025,0.040998574,0.00036130604,0.0012904025,0.0005983947,0.33384904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862254,0.00037694984,0.00005061882,0.00016660006,0.00057215255,0.00021119756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983438,0.00075762,0.00013734637,0.00008994287,0.00036076392,0.0003105926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012476251,0.0005382851,0.00049415935,0.0026561855,0.0070729083,0.011815447,0.0012194285,0.00434352,0.014163974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027017607,0.00048609456,0.0003631557,0.004624671,0.011007698,0.015243052,0.004598652,0.0061586252,0.0019367224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049158907,0.000014576824,0.0001995773,0.0001823987,0.0000017692162,0.00019511668,0.006579576,0.00019160847,0.00011567647,0.50628275,0.44573534,0.040496647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013969835,0.0000054978395,0.000394339,0.0002954615,0.0000014063795,0.00014115473,0.0029336468,0.00007691851,0.000020295338,0.037888426,0.95823485,0.000006701109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019038562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029573733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019038562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063785156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008565945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04738319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1444178792","doi":"","title":"Should Elephants Have Standing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Dissenting opinion; Legal guardian; Law; Dissent; Animal welfare; Economic Justice; Political science; Animal rights; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.2694121803915257,"score_gpt":0.3885767891158914,"score_spread":0.11916460872436568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1444178792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20702624,0.0036103139,0.0022469054,0.21112168,0.002470888,0.00008193662,0.00015210189,0.000064408785,0.5732255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73088145,0.0014863482,0.0011273318,0.11885536,0.0010015523,0.000114813716,0.000090665875,0.000026578373,0.14641589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99746156,0.0006970695,0.000100057296,0.0005023566,0.0004928514,0.0007461637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848723,0.00048164127,0.00017643017,0.00013430013,0.00038003596,0.000340362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033490593,0.00030076542,0.00035401896,0.00042845713,0.008752409,0.0028753893,0.0009793647,0.008529716,0.008223052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005999073,0.00024663744,0.00039683955,0.00031772623,0.014909291,0.0028909594,0.0030369686,0.0056861173,0.001193385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016956704,0.00013695024,0.03001145,0.0001566454,0.00006209266,0.0060180468,0.04072995,0.00014466843,0.005069364,0.79359215,0.08290983,0.040999267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072235795,0.0005632008,0.027941497,0.00075514236,0.0001021979,0.0027105235,0.032778,0.00022890994,0.0023398665,0.09704769,0.8353394,0.00012131497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02672221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06736976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02672221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022297748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041422467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05313337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W144438982","doi":"10.3138/cjcrim.42.3.281","title":"Shame and criminal justice","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Criminology; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.06122890941349064,"score_gpt":0.29988065431975963,"score_spread":0.238651744906269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W144438982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27678385,0.018265117,0.00089078484,0.18928827,0.00082735845,0.000028164059,0.000066900066,0.000011306744,0.5138382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98466647,0.0016492463,0.00008923222,0.00335442,0.00015981552,0.000007882309,0.0000074657523,0.0000045974643,0.010060746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981597,0.0009802803,0.000038632246,0.000100918995,0.0003131551,0.00040724245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99369943,0.0035547798,0.0007144468,0.00025053098,0.00079827284,0.0009825453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002660662,0.00018908228,0.00028742186,0.0011249782,0.007816721,0.006155267,0.000675943,0.0055168923,0.009898194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009669751,0.00018791044,0.00019826113,0.00090537925,0.02141101,0.0033518248,0.0022497023,0.0041996883,0.0005655899],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106185915,0.0003254682,0.01492233,0.00007310862,0.000026508304,0.0006774002,0.07010041,0.00018311972,0.00023593336,0.87027216,0.017846258,0.025231099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000735051,0.000107048065,0.035457473,0.0002836912,0.000036489342,0.00094344665,0.11273238,0.00037163228,0.0001587957,0.74100983,0.10875966,0.00006598777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021599662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036405303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021599662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033298477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005369766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04294783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1448862946","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002472","title":"Can Pragmatism Overcome the Impasse in Contemporary Legal Theory?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Pragmatism; Epistemology; Context (archaeology); Legal realism; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Legal research","score_opus":0.03241627777524131,"score_gpt":0.28418534158856035,"score_spread":0.25176906381331904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1448862946","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043956358,0.012051535,0.05260479,0.6982515,0.0024906562,0.00007431493,0.000027896393,0.00013902645,0.190404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93949604,0.004444489,0.017585902,0.024249377,0.0016209898,0.0001550285,0.000020928868,0.00010159108,0.012325537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97732556,0.014296113,0.0006756697,0.0018928266,0.0039823395,0.0018275958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97177416,0.016667379,0.0025062715,0.0039277845,0.0033049707,0.001819502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03821366,0.0007287518,0.0014889636,0.0032595373,0.011719169,0.016305115,0.0037456625,0.013313167,0.00556555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066114284,0.0006866755,0.0016391464,0.002403557,0.0804165,0.043358777,0.013778831,0.018412804,0.0012212361],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007159915,0.00001183698,0.00017718824,0.00003799744,0.0000074575623,0.00004773762,0.004528077,0.000110377565,0.000030935862,0.98887026,0.0010605108,0.0051105185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011546794,0.000015700569,0.000090629976,0.000086789216,0.000003875682,0.000050460596,0.0021956554,0.00030494825,0.000037715323,0.98309463,0.014098411,0.000009517529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003923524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037771787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03821366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009539974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011457396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20209557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1463540937","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511732270.007","title":"Integrity and impartial morality <scp>ii</scp>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Computer security; Content (measure theory); Internet privacy; Computer science; Advertising; Business; Political science; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03210414326150342,"score_gpt":0.23714887792468553,"score_spread":0.20504473466318213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1463540937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040229087,0.018362788,0.0027183278,0.010809895,0.0010072289,0.000016877611,0.0000980492,0.00008678364,0.9664978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051194157,0.02624399,0.0021945392,0.0051939744,0.0023628853,0.000108488384,0.00022763673,0.0003380678,0.91213626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910575,0.0002840709,0.000024094084,0.000078012745,0.0004286378,0.00007946792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889815,0.000575543,0.00006069066,0.0001323562,0.00025727332,0.00007591464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000997637,0.00047511846,0.0004392536,0.0010895557,0.0020786282,0.005994193,0.0007072513,0.0021940542,0.043132167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032262467,0.00029421228,0.00033485304,0.0012894191,0.0062713106,0.004728793,0.001552895,0.0041366643,0.013682804],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006223623,0.0000096617005,0.000046961108,0.000140464,0.0000030846213,0.000030193578,0.00082285685,0.00015436887,0.00010906296,0.6704978,0.28519207,0.04298731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028334434,0.0000069799926,0.00028130724,0.00046786683,0.00000317684,0.00008174704,0.00037119584,0.00020072091,0.00028144786,0.2431181,0.7551756,0.000009009449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005340419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072554518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043132167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041041933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031774624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14429146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1473468351","doi":"","title":"The Importance of Social Activism to a Fuller Concept of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Law; Law and economics; Injustice; Public law; Private law; Capital (architecture); Political science","score_opus":0.11651775076143608,"score_gpt":0.3531484445510555,"score_spread":0.2366306937896194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1473468351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051848557,0.008932873,0.08503256,0.19753344,0.0019095406,0.000122301,0.00005229694,0.000090472335,0.65447795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9601742,0.0019449164,0.010466458,0.01161943,0.0017002652,0.00018525144,0.000026267526,0.00004571175,0.0138376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895515,0.007159886,0.0002631468,0.0010555671,0.0013516761,0.0006182939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825614,0.012150716,0.0013596164,0.0017898327,0.0010487351,0.0010895722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009134131,0.000412842,0.0006178118,0.0025067565,0.0074412334,0.013687102,0.0015025052,0.0067155515,0.0046972283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0103171775,0.00036820245,0.00058556924,0.0013837736,0.10499781,0.014835956,0.007949192,0.010509849,0.00042760192],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014709916,0.000008083404,0.000088933026,0.000009854428,0.0000011846472,0.000014544594,0.00193986,0.000046927784,0.000024499746,0.9960931,0.0003294207,0.0014422562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052965165,0.000017817893,0.00022537711,0.000074573596,0.0000025171996,0.000051766187,0.002331679,0.00024998534,0.00006108786,0.94408256,0.05289045,0.0000069091784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015069225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015434956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013687102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041503687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004164747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048306465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484715761","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199673599.013.0011","title":"Indigenous Legal Traditions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Anthropology; Geography; Sociology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.025282290816716672,"score_gpt":0.22025480882195916,"score_spread":0.19497251800524248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484715761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033284964,0.00252255,0.0003684884,0.0016257525,0.00021143928,0.000015089261,0.00002463098,0.00001958206,0.991884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.122431435,0.0036911007,0.0008847983,0.0012845949,0.00029532766,0.000055678156,0.000047915793,0.000067462446,0.8712417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992549,0.00020348997,0.000025835072,0.000106903404,0.00022346764,0.00018541371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995764,0.00014140028,0.000025666195,0.00009482353,0.00010143388,0.000060316863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008207971,0.00033074184,0.00032589317,0.0012655389,0.0072311955,0.00597132,0.000860143,0.0017737816,0.040224265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015571542,0.0002220155,0.00014506045,0.0014765074,0.008087719,0.0031279114,0.002894805,0.003735564,0.004336455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055572036,0.000019930587,0.00014549437,0.00008313984,0.0000023286766,0.00011892685,0.025736576,0.000028062066,0.00014850865,0.9177205,0.026189648,0.029801311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036280944,0.000009439504,0.0007657463,0.00026628876,0.0000043793193,0.00013420968,0.0064350134,0.00004071545,0.00011963947,0.055648908,0.9365659,0.0000060999805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025037233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067804486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040224265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040829126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035857484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13456357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1485126008","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1310","title":"Patchwork Law Reform: Your Idea Is Good in Practice, but It Won't Work in Theory","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Law reform; Legislature; Law; Practice of law; Agency (philosophy); Political science; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Legal profession; Social science","score_opus":0.0165522975513268,"score_gpt":0.3021120839325519,"score_spread":0.2855597863812251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1485126008","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016988486,0.007928545,0.073597044,0.8011924,0.0036604863,0.00020415073,0.00004191936,0.00045387555,0.09593306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77011245,0.005695379,0.06463631,0.11050945,0.0037718182,0.0008100186,0.000095812684,0.00051733793,0.043851484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9802742,0.0124263875,0.0004730173,0.0019499959,0.0033944019,0.0014820376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779312,0.00904541,0.0015400348,0.0074932426,0.0021972926,0.0017928326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01983375,0.0006832178,0.0011035758,0.0015547985,0.0076387385,0.01477604,0.002417242,0.009922051,0.0074426886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04132467,0.0005895619,0.0007982513,0.0012004856,0.053045727,0.037920512,0.01014992,0.012203269,0.0025651178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031666325,0.000078694706,0.001136616,0.00017389708,0.000021132717,0.00008611601,0.008381364,0.00050428463,0.00024729056,0.92111003,0.030482683,0.037746154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033405126,0.00009969695,0.0005231329,0.0003598476,0.00001799787,0.00014267166,0.0066974107,0.0007862913,0.0002494025,0.8130126,0.1780524,0.000025169405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025103574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028294162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01983375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046280967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077612563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104892135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1487604716","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1297690","title":"Law and Literature Seminar, Draft Syllabus","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Syllabus; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.006164650757486322,"score_gpt":0.24772177589733183,"score_spread":0.2415571251398455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1487604716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016180195,0.0008495601,0.005134702,0.10643988,0.041298147,0.009208316,0.041420694,0.005471125,0.77399725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012060525,0.00028072315,0.0021866716,0.005749142,0.0037009052,0.002396528,0.008113815,0.0006994937,0.9648122],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843985,0.0002269775,0.00015238753,0.00013265984,0.0007065175,0.00034166424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98849654,0.0019340451,0.00029971093,0.00048069863,0.005681036,0.003107963],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034351563,0.0006678635,0.00087202975,0.0032904716,0.006252611,0.005360885,0.0012078949,0.004148759,0.48203653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017430697,0.001030569,0.0006246435,0.0015492478,0.0010251704,0.002622128,0.0031694542,0.004378635,0.34703016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008350692,0.0002018846,0.00016412085,0.00006412102,0.0000011093042,0.00005584442,0.0001727799,0.00004315174,0.00041191367,0.0013195357,0.9870208,0.0104612075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015208976,0.00013451066,0.007598327,0.00020658736,0.000005996463,0.000046187357,0.0011472082,0.00032493874,0.0010346752,0.0062197545,0.9830862,0.00004351166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01708949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053726908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48203653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047687977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013753939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.738812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1490626919","doi":"","title":"Ruminations of an Activist Queer Lawyer","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thirdspace","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.02759119327526608,"score_gpt":0.31698891949675373,"score_spread":0.28939772622148763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1490626919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69923556,0.0015458609,0.0013129902,0.2546806,0.0048934757,0.0000910692,0.00019390318,0.00014747944,0.03789901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9388417,0.00094207714,0.00032661913,0.039055727,0.0027696409,0.00004879256,0.000078067154,0.000060757553,0.017876575],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573874,0.0024426046,0.0001586089,0.00036095534,0.0005626446,0.0007364581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9674605,0.021687819,0.00446133,0.001009637,0.002764761,0.0026159536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036861063,0.0006172747,0.00038271982,0.0014459423,0.01689773,0.0055633998,0.0010524427,0.013786421,0.004300572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048254162,0.000517673,0.00035285312,0.00057903194,0.0048942803,0.0036933513,0.0026852742,0.018571569,0.0012235816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008424367,0.0006227867,0.040052805,0.00021700098,0.00019480562,0.023636289,0.73530066,0.0005645595,0.005712783,0.016604898,0.14576763,0.030483318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101025966,0.0006625145,0.023693325,0.00041264843,0.000099372286,0.008684305,0.69940895,0.0021213468,0.0036269005,0.003911563,0.25711828,0.00015982047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011486954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01854427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01689773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028923578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014697851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022840202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492816531","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100000636","title":"Kim Brooks and Robert Leckey, eds. Queer Theory: Law, Culture, Empire. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2010, 222 p.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Queer; Content (measure theory); Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Art history; Art; Law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.024671589949692773,"score_gpt":0.2667164475345381,"score_spread":0.24204485758484534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492816531","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043271534,0.9343498,0.0014004322,0.035713766,0.0017832408,0.000017154525,0.00045621497,0.00006666843,0.025780052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01465743,0.93764275,0.0023107948,0.0030719833,0.0018898562,0.000067281675,0.00033230046,0.00013477275,0.039892804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891305,0.00033568294,0.000085766624,0.00013322248,0.00040368948,0.00012865473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99622214,0.0022809282,0.00026295305,0.000115886796,0.0008767326,0.00024142336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019985142,0.0022822658,0.0014648555,0.0042112484,0.0033902023,0.005300751,0.0020417229,0.0036790979,0.025518963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006881499,0.001653251,0.0008396059,0.0057173376,0.0045581143,0.013754846,0.0012373208,0.0038165583,0.008257465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005279439,0.00002862552,0.0005000614,0.00082178373,0.000020513864,0.00010726307,0.0030264463,0.0002527879,0.000085225125,0.042231254,0.84168804,0.1111852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025160985,0.000013707071,0.0028221474,0.0027675978,0.00003664877,0.00026840103,0.00311615,0.00022836885,0.00021305449,0.055999797,0.9344681,0.000040977717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1884457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.306427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1884457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006989481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01261116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37469763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492889454","doi":"","title":"The Improvisational Flavour of Law, the Legal Taste of Improvisation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Scholarship; Taste; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Engineering; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.00556614620435895,"score_gpt":0.25937316799029714,"score_spread":0.25380702178593817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492889454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07260238,0.0079020215,0.06288366,0.106548995,0.002396312,0.00009170361,0.000048326296,0.00019382592,0.7473327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9544695,0.002414614,0.005740125,0.005160319,0.0006439974,0.00010102782,0.000022376638,0.00014879914,0.03129928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99246454,0.0047733174,0.00019803105,0.0006153041,0.0014228277,0.0005260034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834282,0.012548618,0.0009014933,0.001633655,0.0008477667,0.0006402841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051730163,0.00040866656,0.0003943126,0.0012778328,0.008596525,0.01559603,0.0013775956,0.0035849544,0.008904825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01749456,0.00022545182,0.00037289035,0.0011914666,0.051919688,0.010942621,0.005919556,0.007383704,0.001243747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000160518,0.000010289329,0.00039923142,0.00008943954,0.0000028163765,0.00008583666,0.03315765,0.00010735202,0.00015828437,0.950342,0.0034364145,0.012194621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010806124,0.00008579698,0.0011420244,0.00073814247,0.000008381705,0.0005171374,0.09723918,0.0007564236,0.0007596608,0.6089253,0.28978413,0.000033093995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025133265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037462641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01559603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034933514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031343992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029789567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494454959","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2000v25n3a1166","title":"Mass Media Reporting of Canadian Supreme Court Decisions: Mapping the Terrain","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Supreme Court Decisions; Power (physics); Law; Element (criminal law)","score_opus":0.08792239221137123,"score_gpt":0.3019763189820683,"score_spread":0.21405392677069707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494454959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9308646,0.005953528,0.0013788065,0.005377595,0.00010070325,0.0002575199,0.0043287296,0.00007554015,0.051662955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98852205,0.0041320766,0.0017199425,0.00025173934,0.00007023039,0.00009932629,0.0015022844,0.000031342966,0.003670999],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99488837,0.0008667929,0.00019137471,0.00037057814,0.0026596952,0.0010231059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97695744,0.00737828,0.004001487,0.00066712307,0.010121518,0.0008740726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004090711,0.00046841044,0.0004185602,0.026644474,0.008637949,0.008991286,0.0022245308,0.00084686425,0.0026310382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024014661,0.00049424625,0.00030680798,0.041958403,0.003616065,0.0028097522,0.0037881415,0.0012370681,0.00024780302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017663176,0.00011871638,0.2894371,0.0009983975,0.00008989454,0.0015945621,0.47442177,0.0007157582,0.0021770026,0.010244541,0.016556872,0.20346883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070360234,0.000040503768,0.5739567,0.00063962874,0.00004408802,0.00029055864,0.35445392,0.0009933717,0.00081149425,0.0005972204,0.06807188,0.00009349327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97698396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9864137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037029266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037029266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037859607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2686674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1496035506","doi":"","title":"Law in the Age of Media Logic: An Introduction","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Political science; Law; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.011570455919811543,"score_gpt":0.27253968574844456,"score_spread":0.260969229828633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1496035506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003758534,0.34599808,0.0147244055,0.13446057,0.03259178,0.00016913618,0.0005376475,0.00017131984,0.46758857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12086859,0.4541664,0.014271946,0.08078065,0.111178435,0.0008914811,0.0006564249,0.0005124621,0.21667372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979233,0.0008762052,0.000108678236,0.00023548292,0.0005884701,0.00026777442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954857,0.0033761316,0.00018819266,0.00016022124,0.0005171423,0.00027248467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018608642,0.0012546369,0.0008744052,0.0070051025,0.00469699,0.013264922,0.0015753681,0.0066262935,0.016782578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004773392,0.00064890983,0.0008424163,0.0065544494,0.009443785,0.018532509,0.0038486135,0.00827982,0.0034996152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002249334,0.00006593531,0.0004648142,0.00045272673,0.0000075177245,0.00014195366,0.003816625,0.00026402433,0.00019699988,0.835181,0.12562558,0.033760313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066745065,0.000033488424,0.0005084937,0.0011617035,0.0000042029037,0.0001453431,0.00206232,0.00021905631,0.00006352157,0.114241935,0.8815356,0.000017688288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003977902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038171713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016782578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005276053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026793887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056143343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498093533","doi":"","title":"Settlement and Mediation in Canadian Legal Television","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Settlement (finance); Political science; Character (mathematics); Law; Alternative dispute resolution; Transformative mediation; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science; Business","score_opus":0.009757294034758859,"score_gpt":0.2537346464574121,"score_spread":0.24397735242265325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498093533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4719384,0.0027453483,0.0006258388,0.0098043475,0.00015629499,0.000030822655,0.00016565365,0.000029647485,0.5145036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98489076,0.001092296,0.00014217227,0.00047370602,0.00002536665,0.000009423347,0.00004915067,0.000012638751,0.013304478],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970407,0.0007120599,0.000036903202,0.00017654477,0.0010028811,0.0010308895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984091,0.00049751386,0.00022352627,0.000058953952,0.00052552373,0.000285504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012503684,0.0003441702,0.00027289876,0.003729909,0.023719575,0.009340646,0.0011919724,0.0014830966,0.014084337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048373044,0.00027909275,0.0003156297,0.005767108,0.013844411,0.0019816877,0.004696165,0.0024532229,0.00029904358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000584806,0.000085327345,0.020169318,0.00015522535,0.000030230247,0.0018817311,0.5502087,0.00082399993,0.00091519713,0.36050493,0.02100455,0.044162422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017464396,0.00002976057,0.06611276,0.00035360918,0.000053812902,0.0004240608,0.62678915,0.00066689344,0.0005133196,0.009498782,0.29545033,0.00009004956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9777541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9842653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08038291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08038291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04386628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58322155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500911828","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005610","title":"Uncommonly Common: The Nature of Common Law Judgment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Law; Common law; Politics; Common ground; Common sense; Epistemology; Political science; Function (biology); Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01189168377211633,"score_gpt":0.2794320054758199,"score_spread":0.26754032170370357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500911828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060715627,0.009263107,0.12527503,0.18929647,0.0020697624,0.00019663772,0.00016401328,0.00012761216,0.61289173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97304463,0.001236152,0.009324084,0.008928601,0.0007963346,0.000113001355,0.00005088622,0.000053977918,0.006452328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9391882,0.030616699,0.0023981964,0.008471338,0.015340519,0.0039850976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9398227,0.038316913,0.0043077273,0.0071386667,0.008253365,0.0021607075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03512304,0.0004368767,0.0012203039,0.004488295,0.011494271,0.02091361,0.0031398898,0.008712674,0.004336496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09627654,0.00052830635,0.0010037223,0.0034414416,0.09203071,0.026763698,0.008011906,0.010206718,0.000594073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005232458,0.0000055577616,0.0002773944,0.00001834421,0.000006944195,0.000049597948,0.002628416,0.000102966624,0.000034440098,0.9927537,0.0012245596,0.0028927939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005725281,0.0000046920845,0.00023890162,0.000055234384,0.0000044543654,0.000042681382,0.0013322142,0.00031917635,0.00005817064,0.9881214,0.009806944,0.000010471927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012169075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009193655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03512304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012093376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01065877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1857506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1501713685","doi":"10.7202/1007822ar","title":"Ronald Niezen, Public Justice and the Anthropology of Law (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp 254. ISBN 978-0-52-176704-0","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Media studies; Sociology; Anthropology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04281848983061244,"score_gpt":0.26158348505680673,"score_spread":0.2187649952261943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1501713685","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021681625,0.91597307,0.0011814561,0.028117254,0.002232926,0.000024774194,0.00035825948,0.00012322071,0.05177217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011670667,0.83440316,0.0041189254,0.007179352,0.0025178327,0.00016402666,0.00049123156,0.00029013635,0.13916464],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972543,0.0010343179,0.00025434245,0.00032601086,0.00094434107,0.00018667513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978923,0.001256498,0.00024031513,0.00012689467,0.00033075394,0.00015336637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031226554,0.0019712257,0.001081246,0.0049170903,0.0021272972,0.006494964,0.002346368,0.0045842556,0.05447205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005364283,0.0014656348,0.00073392456,0.0053445003,0.0045907293,0.016559893,0.0025333348,0.004114167,0.025137233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045682275,0.000027741753,0.0002069372,0.0009862304,0.00002182906,0.00008715236,0.0016791178,0.00015808396,0.00014185334,0.055806156,0.8512935,0.08954573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007509225,0.000005043215,0.0007555901,0.0009428861,0.000009048211,0.00011575835,0.0007293394,0.000050735078,0.00009411302,0.022796914,0.9744682,0.000024961524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038205832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08587887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05447205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006615321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054502334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1822272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504091371","doi":"10.1159/000435952","title":"When the ‘Ugly Duckling' Loses Brothers, It Becomes the ‘Only Son of a Widowed Mother'","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Dermatology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SKiN Health","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.02871168860404588,"score_gpt":0.29363249007261105,"score_spread":0.26492080146856517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504091371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4997043,0.4379057,0.013292084,0.0035728533,0.0017510682,0.0002665309,0.0034551367,0.00040069065,0.03965163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70599115,0.24908768,0.014080663,0.0029544637,0.0011336337,0.00009254835,0.004588222,0.00034261725,0.021729015],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930465,0.000111133784,0.00014559651,0.00010132384,0.00025106102,0.00008621841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731284,0.0012100184,0.000650265,0.00013229721,0.0005023826,0.00019201991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077808084,0.00036771537,0.00040377915,0.0039894693,0.00043509144,0.00055399654,0.0007568438,0.00067511987,0.0037051293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040827,0.0002933099,0.00035202288,0.0018367069,0.00043407298,0.0012558366,0.00065356574,0.0005566847,0.0022536681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022034219,0.00009697799,0.19693398,0.0054005166,0.00014100569,0.12754063,0.00365481,0.0003792087,0.012521414,0.0011951652,0.026764017,0.625152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008289099,0.0001792748,0.14720756,0.0016511277,0.00019395803,0.45209357,0.0033867313,0.00023065663,0.009602686,0.00047307,0.38491258,0.000060487502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023485927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005626433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039894693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003557249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076823874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012394965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504639510","doi":"","title":"Living Deadwood: Imagination, Affect, and the Persistence of the Past","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Persistence (discontinuity); Affect (linguistics); Order (exchange); Aesthetics; Affect theory; History; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Art; Economics; Engineering; Communication","score_opus":0.019385248712974673,"score_gpt":0.27103278955462656,"score_spread":0.25164754084165186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504639510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27679753,0.042329527,0.004722217,0.05887777,0.0004255379,0.000015492871,0.00011734893,0.00003334094,0.61668116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921555,0.0027088034,0.00016267209,0.00051869237,0.00008223876,0.0000048066227,0.000011677804,0.000007750984,0.0043479726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984579,0.0010645696,0.000035576093,0.000096230855,0.00019826558,0.00014742267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99329233,0.004609189,0.000878862,0.0004369625,0.00037029604,0.00041239738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00353833,0.00021724783,0.00020351137,0.0012059187,0.0037693868,0.008736654,0.0007275105,0.0018441405,0.0051846295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010290929,0.00017346274,0.00019660697,0.0010535541,0.023891313,0.010378843,0.0028303312,0.0020676847,0.000332154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010397141,0.00003809939,0.0035555174,0.00013882628,0.000021353628,0.00039426406,0.19413511,0.00025654223,0.00024155549,0.74606955,0.011979597,0.0430656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003426952,0.00007254567,0.010505161,0.0006507133,0.00002883703,0.00067092536,0.18213907,0.00053267303,0.00030681115,0.6136836,0.19132385,0.00005148764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004581813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075287446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008736654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023344562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012390321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0187127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507029239","doi":"","title":"The Communicative Criterion: Establishing a New Standard for Non-Violent Sexual Encounters by Reframing Consent","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thirdspace","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Construct (python library); Human sexuality; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.02223077642743782,"score_gpt":0.3411397665806579,"score_spread":0.3189089901532201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507029239","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024871413,0.0054568406,0.4825765,0.24314277,0.0043801395,0.0010240787,0.0002039904,0.0005281963,0.23781611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68638986,0.0033259322,0.259232,0.030189574,0.002387059,0.002829026,0.0002662793,0.0005712841,0.014808948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8409234,0.11104918,0.012009951,0.009875291,0.022035327,0.0041067917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8197006,0.10404394,0.011953194,0.030025631,0.02827784,0.005998784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.126266,0.0012549482,0.0018004795,0.0062761684,0.013918325,0.022039149,0.006904937,0.015309438,0.0032122321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16908768,0.00093461206,0.0017081081,0.0036630349,0.13615267,0.038498178,0.019657249,0.023911111,0.0012975242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076189635,0.000009690552,0.0002999861,0.00004789014,0.000002404209,0.00007187832,0.011351959,0.000078667596,0.00011008573,0.98060226,0.0017934868,0.0056240964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001736389,0.000044915265,0.00059236976,0.00068270095,0.000014023217,0.00041412917,0.009975518,0.0009913112,0.0005460227,0.88707864,0.09954998,0.00009298798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011186874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00856154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.126266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016941274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035804994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66776645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513301480","doi":"","title":"Dignity and the Conditions of Truth: What Equality Needs from Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Humanities; Interpretation (philosophy); Sociology; Ethnology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.031650207202165416,"score_gpt":0.28310874639364203,"score_spread":0.2514585391914766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513301480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14356558,0.012887453,0.011006357,0.16334544,0.00072829943,0.00006983994,0.000107054155,0.00002949064,0.6682606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890492,0.0018474829,0.00059731846,0.0025497342,0.00021093916,0.00003329191,0.000017686765,0.000016886652,0.0056773704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99258786,0.0040638032,0.0002642111,0.0005662683,0.0012159612,0.0013019273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98851264,0.008721146,0.00064189435,0.0007490741,0.0006460669,0.000729222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008133367,0.00037448973,0.0008405425,0.0015454008,0.0098894555,0.017617721,0.0017392824,0.008585031,0.008602988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017165072,0.00042695834,0.0006246682,0.0011512641,0.09217182,0.03349076,0.008886053,0.007045678,0.00067991513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008259805,0.0000061247047,0.0001897986,0.00002479224,0.0000010516759,0.00008640659,0.008792689,0.000037694892,0.000034504785,0.98871136,0.00031820737,0.0017891016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011848779,0.000019369614,0.0006058116,0.00028316613,0.0000045146285,0.00012690003,0.02221357,0.00015883772,0.00013228325,0.9528443,0.023586573,0.000012845375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009458552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008152928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017617721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012801964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008182305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09288514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1515667156","doi":"","title":"\"Academic Concerns\" - Caring about Conversation in Canadian Common Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Tort; Duty; Common law; Duty of care; Meaning (existential); Principal (computer security); Conversation; Imperfect; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Liability; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.24887162918708497,"score_gpt":0.41488223952453257,"score_spread":0.1660106103374476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1515667156","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07919403,0.009904735,0.0067791785,0.4958855,0.00251823,0.0001309243,0.00014495107,0.00019975007,0.40524274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9247486,0.0021803344,0.0014492514,0.04990252,0.00042250036,0.00006655113,0.00004905722,0.00009305394,0.021088105],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96277386,0.015295825,0.0009063612,0.0029963125,0.0101765515,0.007851135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630461,0.019679533,0.0023373712,0.00096274284,0.0077453055,0.0062289666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01928237,0.00083944754,0.0008417848,0.0044613476,0.10754255,0.027381696,0.0048086094,0.014004918,0.009758196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047477234,0.0008035157,0.00079579063,0.0045644585,0.08275792,0.01551095,0.015670583,0.018323349,0.0007322933],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002242417,0.000021784032,0.0013143067,0.00009304049,0.000009174888,0.0007642085,0.58355343,0.00015345667,0.00021290783,0.3635402,0.035577893,0.0147371255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018697056,0.000019992685,0.0026732106,0.0003995053,0.000023323337,0.0003516116,0.46352345,0.00058619486,0.00028232022,0.08001639,0.45194122,0.00016407069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9712133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9727854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24304597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24304597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21239436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8779594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516595739","doi":"","title":"Disciplining the Unruly: Sexual outlaws, Little Sisters and the Legacy of Butler","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Human sexuality; Constitutionality; Harm; Pornography; Mainstream; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04402990314997651,"score_gpt":0.337857493579087,"score_spread":0.2938275904291105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516595739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23460476,0.013896626,0.004534686,0.24123101,0.0008272027,0.000041832634,0.000029223469,0.000043792585,0.50479096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8993317,0.0025876798,0.0007879565,0.030716788,0.0002242518,0.0000244955,0.000009822305,0.000038787588,0.06627854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646413,0.0014277465,0.000069857306,0.0004724013,0.0011151803,0.00045066036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976562,0.00137064,0.0001967744,0.00014219226,0.00030638522,0.00032776676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003429971,0.00018509544,0.000354973,0.0007145607,0.017149024,0.0074785664,0.0012312791,0.0055432236,0.0036535228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008282898,0.00035273374,0.00018026728,0.00067044667,0.04168455,0.00550638,0.0076936814,0.007359804,0.00033738883],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011432645,0.00001038816,0.0005090672,0.000026078449,0.0000024464593,0.00027079374,0.061592896,0.000038702,0.00019967876,0.9181227,0.009634908,0.009580899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002807979,0.00005340238,0.0013005484,0.0003819272,0.000014559312,0.0007729356,0.08620561,0.00022749981,0.0012152164,0.26922753,0.6405293,0.000043500368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1075797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17923893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1075797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009386346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009496517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21390706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516704135","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2011v36n2a2484","title":"Impersonation: Troubling the Person in Law and Culture","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05944694832155207,"score_gpt":0.276869620779599,"score_spread":0.21742267245804692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516704135","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16857569,0.009184668,0.01155929,0.40871122,0.0034218912,0.00006799232,0.000045818855,0.000114779665,0.39831862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96846414,0.0008616511,0.0006093004,0.017958753,0.00034333864,0.000028499764,0.000008004882,0.00006501067,0.0116612585],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9729389,0.02003874,0.00040230696,0.0014665523,0.0021522515,0.003001128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725123,0.018751,0.0020052816,0.0017823048,0.0024959936,0.0024530638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015190583,0.0008310787,0.001028667,0.0026201548,0.04522802,0.02023146,0.0038705969,0.022686552,0.0055247936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03319966,0.0006650184,0.00071884796,0.0018486679,0.13464366,0.030313311,0.015367889,0.02916781,0.0005624292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001692168,0.000018636123,0.00045881947,0.000032301457,0.00000515717,0.0008071623,0.51727194,0.000037226968,0.00009508978,0.46790335,0.010276836,0.0030766209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018575369,0.000023308286,0.00045564334,0.00023797365,0.000016860035,0.0010895301,0.6213435,0.00024255227,0.00030507965,0.20478691,0.17142835,0.000051794712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07537929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064178675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07537929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0148927225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01945106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14988106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517055903","doi":"","title":"Marx’s Practical Thinking Logic of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Automatic summarization; Ideology; Epistemology; German; Philosophy; Lateral thinking; Term logic; Sociology; Law; Computer science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Creative thinking; Linguistics; Computational logic","score_opus":0.060472496914234626,"score_gpt":0.4112163079705736,"score_spread":0.350743811056339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517055903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01539931,0.0065110945,0.13804209,0.064513065,0.0009841803,0.00016381055,0.0004252352,0.00023453502,0.77372664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8754616,0.00396552,0.04618081,0.0062806015,0.0011633317,0.00044303463,0.00019387872,0.00012199437,0.06618915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99144167,0.004241692,0.00039680884,0.0009743236,0.0021628458,0.000782661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689674,0.0016305301,0.00023749686,0.00037807896,0.00072714075,0.00013007017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006842958,0.0006775916,0.00051960617,0.0027317577,0.0044737435,0.006625447,0.0011118916,0.0028610143,0.0036120347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007729052,0.0003178419,0.00061215396,0.0017344069,0.037986726,0.007029341,0.0028964877,0.0037278081,0.0012524913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002317764,0.0000016955329,0.000015306658,0.00000846893,0.0000010248309,0.00001065077,0.00048615746,0.00013158715,0.000017084882,0.99680495,0.0013338557,0.001186929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005464034,0.0000041757266,0.000039334216,0.00002613984,0.0000016336061,0.000021302838,0.00021496584,0.00030153256,0.000092273935,0.96050346,0.038783055,0.0000066378648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046492633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026399612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011385472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011385472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007958196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082607746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519971228","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2007v32n2a1845","title":"Image Ethics in the Digital Age","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Image (mathematics); Sociology; Computer vision; Computer science","score_opus":0.0492969867835601,"score_gpt":0.34244115599132713,"score_spread":0.29314416920776704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519971228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019354416,0.034683097,0.0034826088,0.4345473,0.005457896,0.000017338418,0.00002772511,0.00004780142,0.5023818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7253461,0.023374347,0.0020988612,0.06568557,0.008688837,0.000075201744,0.000027137796,0.00012077732,0.1745832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678636,0.0021077658,0.00005858591,0.00016777805,0.0006534406,0.00022609175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617565,0.0023713722,0.00022948478,0.00019392291,0.0005691439,0.00046037036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002032596,0.00017452537,0.00014446882,0.0004889286,0.004043764,0.008930494,0.00031557528,0.003178432,0.0054927142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008179163,0.00008554801,0.000102996586,0.0003932446,0.014198018,0.005873229,0.0022886132,0.0032165928,0.0010815292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011177025,0.000010415956,0.00023880308,0.000044053053,0.0000014277872,0.000094660856,0.008967196,0.000046634224,0.00008306056,0.84273297,0.12508993,0.022679659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004304368,0.000010906414,0.00072061195,0.00027258808,0.0000023459331,0.00019464726,0.010754652,0.00018202531,0.0002322484,0.17612298,0.81149346,0.000009281337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047424687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054454156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99525756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004486578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027912478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03255254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522331376","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1378","title":"Casablanca: Judgment and Dynamic Enclaves in Law and Cinema","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Narrative; Movie theater; Law; Reading (process); Sociology; Aesthetics; Political science; Visual arts; Literature; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.010356037640239887,"score_gpt":0.2740408615088078,"score_spread":0.2636848238685679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522331376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26858062,0.005507584,0.007153366,0.021966266,0.00041399794,0.00006686476,0.000119143195,0.00015810998,0.6960341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98956376,0.00051452924,0.0005730496,0.00026422358,0.000035646684,0.000017945931,0.000015634623,0.000024121915,0.00899116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982009,0.0012036168,0.000028429786,0.00017065697,0.00021000419,0.00018629504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985191,0.00081368565,0.00020393147,0.000131846,0.00015510857,0.0001762994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010329369,0.00035094377,0.00020510601,0.0012600854,0.009749179,0.00838536,0.0008632812,0.001378616,0.006132582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005431243,0.00019257441,0.0001440328,0.00096640526,0.01634817,0.0048190467,0.00339638,0.0021674023,0.00030530526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008858269,0.000032586504,0.0017025037,0.00016467684,0.000010842799,0.0011668977,0.440852,0.0003603877,0.0020322304,0.52460897,0.0100672785,0.0189131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001433369,0.000044588527,0.008175659,0.00036349968,0.00002157958,0.0010211132,0.25753334,0.0010355202,0.0015931738,0.047659773,0.6824704,0.00006702742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05149192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06957455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05149192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00707858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018880762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10238439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1522729255","doi":"","title":"'Hang onto These Words': Johnny David's Delgamuukw Evidence","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of native studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hang; Art; History; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.12622126483745705,"score_gpt":0.40381186516617296,"score_spread":0.2775906003287159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1522729255","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11543709,0.01592194,0.0010355059,0.51300174,0.0041267783,0.00003190267,0.00019649907,0.00001542621,0.3502331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76084083,0.008224602,0.00043390706,0.16523275,0.001695544,0.000051283427,0.00009529719,0.000083682266,0.06334209],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99650264,0.0013048651,0.00013911273,0.0004454406,0.00076311757,0.0008448114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812723,0.01447117,0.0007721358,0.0006368192,0.0016931166,0.0011544302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004999696,0.00029004688,0.00066927745,0.001705061,0.018413024,0.007018981,0.001855785,0.008678254,0.014690976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02748508,0.00037681457,0.00022638407,0.0022396126,0.019889139,0.008365318,0.006147591,0.016395748,0.0012507377],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011709374,0.00006130235,0.0053943186,0.00029840658,0.00002936473,0.0014794508,0.15189098,0.000032445845,0.00022864794,0.6620589,0.15189956,0.026509505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004154868,0.000022519329,0.009753349,0.0013729502,0.000053770957,0.0009713509,0.22910956,0.00008134246,0.000577806,0.08677065,0.6711885,0.00005667382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097840525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20514305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90215945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004371407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063119982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19454205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523510547","doi":"10.22329/il.v28i1.511","title":"Weighing and Balancing in the Justification of Judicial Decisions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Teleology; Epistemology; Judicial opinion; Computer science; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05173227049874057,"score_gpt":0.30530052203843694,"score_spread":0.25356825153969637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523510547","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059467934,0.00717527,0.6387554,0.028365882,0.0012398576,0.00048932695,0.00009663892,0.00019800164,0.26421165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8502449,0.0018625034,0.13719238,0.0011551594,0.0008410137,0.00037666823,0.000070794355,0.00008374334,0.008172806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9128926,0.06288514,0.0042662662,0.0038609223,0.013186024,0.00290913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9138785,0.06943763,0.005286906,0.0045659044,0.0058436636,0.0009873096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04411774,0.0014065311,0.0018703091,0.006695343,0.0064506694,0.013824953,0.0032429935,0.009722243,0.0061468654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10874478,0.00095283834,0.0016249137,0.0049245595,0.03803137,0.018372621,0.00625374,0.005870991,0.0008963016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013626554,0.0000069984394,0.00007984885,0.000048647275,0.000014040416,0.000044043012,0.0008486805,0.0012051937,0.000069658425,0.99139905,0.0003590806,0.005911163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010873374,0.0000066062457,0.00006362426,0.000056251334,0.000006972597,0.000016180744,0.00021090278,0.0020273516,0.00008491244,0.99431616,0.003189952,0.000010182911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019649437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022650592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04411774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071998625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052264584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23331964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523565237","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1026","title":"A New Lens: Reframing the Conversation about the Use of Video Conferencing in Civil Trials in Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Argument (complex analysis); Videoconferencing; Cognitive reframing; Economic Justice; Credibility; Public relations; Plaintiff; Sociology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Multimedia; Computer science","score_opus":0.17754022989155022,"score_gpt":0.3262000192115653,"score_spread":0.14865978932001506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523565237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48347977,0.007418511,0.012694638,0.26030326,0.0023523774,0.0005767058,0.00049076066,0.00012814485,0.23255585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96145177,0.0038207502,0.0020772563,0.010478265,0.0003055612,0.00019722099,0.000073315176,0.00012996783,0.021465812],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97129637,0.017819948,0.000854169,0.0013794677,0.004792862,0.0038571546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95401585,0.031233989,0.001986737,0.00090452353,0.0064669624,0.0053919526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016352434,0.00089684746,0.00085954653,0.0028836026,0.068330325,0.018955482,0.0038704812,0.0073374584,0.005988465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03360113,0.0011354965,0.00078972976,0.0045705372,0.051523577,0.010926887,0.01260831,0.011014059,0.00050468865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028787868,0.000010946542,0.0008863724,0.00008327329,0.0000050522044,0.0010148229,0.9736955,0.00010412965,0.0004367653,0.016210265,0.004583718,0.0029404133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073363817,0.00001871059,0.0016844273,0.00022543823,0.0000124485805,0.00013750698,0.8359772,0.00020230019,0.00022485097,0.0022341385,0.1592273,0.000048272395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94704264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9788286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21513325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21513325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1262928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91033417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1527839949","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511657535.020","title":"Judgment in Law and the Humanities","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Derecho; Political science; Digital humanities; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02139058362816073,"score_gpt":0.22056655535465255,"score_spread":0.19917597172649182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1527839949","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015594542,0.065742396,0.019365659,0.30220655,0.0023423177,0.00006241209,0.0000847199,0.00011088256,0.5944906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90317935,0.024302335,0.008379348,0.02669906,0.004101312,0.00013790658,0.0000647136,0.000115141665,0.033020984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752686,0.016074475,0.0006618556,0.0022112797,0.0040757107,0.0017080628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766714,0.018052716,0.0011457915,0.0015902227,0.0016459307,0.0008940094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018656172,0.0005113037,0.0008322257,0.0029953555,0.009733507,0.019536622,0.0016976198,0.008257708,0.0051987604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026251754,0.00044740565,0.0005411302,0.002625366,0.09763727,0.018470034,0.0074143084,0.010778617,0.0010445794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027733963,0.0000047562585,0.0000601312,0.000019631874,0.0000021550304,0.000019249535,0.0018911146,0.000084872365,0.000019177724,0.99228704,0.0030151985,0.0025938828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070890296,0.000005815782,0.00012850264,0.0001168726,0.0000021999194,0.000024402252,0.0014880907,0.00014055964,0.00004473394,0.9369099,0.06112219,0.000009691995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013547327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008195395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019536622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013002291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01247524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09866446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528915973","doi":"","title":"Lee Horsley. The Noir Thriller","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International fiction review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Geology","score_opus":0.01855149042069362,"score_gpt":0.3263186622278679,"score_spread":0.3077671718071743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528915973","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042027232,0.15679604,0.0005096141,0.41767505,0.04340552,0.000040692354,0.0006489458,0.00023920422,0.3802647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0073323743,0.05964684,0.00039492996,0.09279236,0.009835043,0.000056064022,0.00032543714,0.00020698406,0.8294099],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978942,0.00055424735,0.000080907696,0.00025226732,0.0010413944,0.0001770905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99382085,0.0015068419,0.0004492348,0.00046807365,0.002565846,0.0011891504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020035172,0.00049715897,0.00050492684,0.002246854,0.0021094428,0.0038911744,0.0009840553,0.0047220564,0.21051738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011994025,0.00037344728,0.0003373374,0.0018480741,0.001272244,0.004493322,0.0020567244,0.0033794797,0.10219517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000081264725,0.000006929601,0.000065738896,0.000083571766,0.0000020496702,0.000012197221,0.000039301758,0.0000056563745,0.000020661171,0.0051292903,0.9598051,0.034821372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034966813,0.000003144048,0.00018175683,0.00014644585,0.000001935007,0.000022826944,0.000080812475,0.000006322018,0.000022222881,0.0018905073,0.9976375,0.0000029384335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0131973615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028761908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21051738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019604045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038071712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7042508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532138292","doi":"","title":"Filiation and the Translation of Legal Concepts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Metaphor; Rhetorical question; Reproduction; Lesbian; Sociology; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Epistemology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Gender studies; Business","score_opus":0.00656339661624791,"score_gpt":0.2828216285662438,"score_spread":0.27625823194999594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532138292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06908685,0.005777846,0.0798868,0.03387761,0.0019559842,0.000118549855,0.00018676584,0.00040753093,0.8087021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655214,0.0013822074,0.009063605,0.0017429674,0.00030711162,0.00006313471,0.00009886742,0.00014836494,0.02167231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861033,0.009799499,0.0006382649,0.0008416271,0.0016468817,0.00097034796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98880494,0.006401601,0.00092087616,0.001674813,0.0020090607,0.00018874682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010136233,0.0005870563,0.0005397165,0.0029266078,0.008107289,0.008555689,0.0014203726,0.002757709,0.0077015925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02025348,0.0002946345,0.00038192308,0.0023826645,0.03960606,0.009628095,0.0039218734,0.0049628736,0.0011180866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013003125,0.0000041373346,0.000092727874,0.00003688819,0.0000014764339,0.00007948586,0.01586086,0.000083340754,0.00012464661,0.97510344,0.0010899517,0.007510002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047712198,0.00007190771,0.00096816634,0.0006038579,0.000022385773,0.00048801853,0.027259743,0.0015758743,0.0018019093,0.60734785,0.35974416,0.00006847721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036965813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018204205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036965813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0136113195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072673173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098757505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532408897","doi":"10.1108/s1059-4337(2009)0000046002","title":"Strange encounters: Exploring law and film in the affective register","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in law, politics, and society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Register (sociolinguistics); Psychology; Art; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.11579859702179778,"score_gpt":0.3331264898714941,"score_spread":0.21732789284969634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532408897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06610239,0.031058181,0.008335453,0.016405053,0.0012956611,0.00004791903,0.00003273134,0.000093593466,0.87662894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88764083,0.012967023,0.0018772242,0.0032179947,0.00075075356,0.000064241845,0.000046350237,0.000118541575,0.09331699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985166,0.0010943741,0.000024869454,0.00009408164,0.00018929294,0.00008083287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988218,0.0009043472,0.00005465892,0.00005223187,0.00005070565,0.000116264804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012600247,0.00048000363,0.00032084074,0.0012414781,0.0049873167,0.008676244,0.00075936294,0.0017888432,0.0033882777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001779189,0.00021165922,0.00026647202,0.0011110149,0.02171613,0.0095513705,0.004234896,0.0041105053,0.0004351263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016048318,0.00003325888,0.00036243163,0.00012981675,0.0000052127693,0.0006540049,0.31343225,0.00010148722,0.00048811708,0.6534281,0.009260737,0.022088595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016706572,0.000055551933,0.0019351772,0.0004639564,0.000010507411,0.0014733014,0.17707753,0.00056447176,0.0005438514,0.19607913,0.6217525,0.000027337452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036112147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006728975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008676244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035858713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010732731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026017487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533176656","doi":"","title":"Collection Black Star et Alfredo Jaar, Human Rights Human Wrongs / The Politics of Images, Ryerson Image Centre, Toronto, du 23 janvier au 14 avril 2013Collection Black Star et Alfredo Jaar, Human Rights Human Wrongs / The Politics of Images, Ryerson Image Centre, Toronto, du 23 janvier au 14 avril 2013","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ciel variable : Art, photo, médias, culture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Star (game theory); Human rights; Politics; Humanities; Art; Art history; Political science; Law; Physics; Astrophysics","score_opus":0.012472779778052936,"score_gpt":0.2539741321172871,"score_spread":0.24150135233923414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533176656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003596191,0.1719748,0.0008050723,0.10290972,0.03935171,0.0004903441,0.036469717,0.0010348066,0.64336765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008631488,0.025218671,0.00048970274,0.0027858617,0.0035582338,0.00014301461,0.004739959,0.00046178896,0.95397127],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978429,0.00018883449,0.00010453044,0.00022297614,0.0013230386,0.0003176804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99519193,0.00056589517,0.00028577278,0.00030962945,0.0028674304,0.00077929674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002565313,0.0012191521,0.0010325355,0.0060185646,0.00918653,0.008234372,0.0013750907,0.002475445,0.21391603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057106568,0.00090512435,0.0006006592,0.007641751,0.0023614215,0.0029393604,0.0028842373,0.0031262392,0.039137397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004303734,0.000001460378,0.0000305403,0.000036878286,6.1660336e-7,0.000005776337,0.00015285815,0.0000044342805,0.000016532973,0.000789305,0.995769,0.0031882674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002594166,0.0000023580853,0.001368606,0.00007767884,0.0000024362962,0.000015325159,0.00050618965,0.0000055072114,0.00004576526,0.00013979897,0.9978282,0.0000055287505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.703594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88438797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29640597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023911346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019797336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7156204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1536794624","doi":"10.21991/c9wh4q","title":"ROADBLOCKS IN THE WAY OF CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06579481639080617,"score_gpt":0.2865437377199745,"score_spread":0.22074892132916832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1536794624","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008134061,0.0129988175,0.055118725,0.7359839,0.005377285,0.00017673796,0.00017750653,0.00029324158,0.18173963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7954187,0.009812016,0.031845164,0.09478773,0.0063008685,0.0008477226,0.00021765417,0.0006383576,0.060131736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9205167,0.050357398,0.0023769794,0.005541616,0.01513268,0.006074711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8921506,0.0752419,0.0024277137,0.011799218,0.012681707,0.005698959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06224999,0.000879838,0.0023710525,0.0033676,0.01498337,0.0285595,0.004454127,0.017140241,0.023115577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.111641444,0.0012488449,0.001791906,0.0024929435,0.09335085,0.049331643,0.014741954,0.038937733,0.0036873498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012256228,0.000012579344,0.000044957033,0.000034005163,0.0000054632405,0.000016595806,0.000577618,0.00016780652,0.000021272725,0.99074906,0.005401836,0.0029565142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015454392,0.000007754425,0.00003825064,0.000056342516,0.0000028686995,0.0000166095,0.00055392465,0.00020053222,0.00004741051,0.9590496,0.039998464,0.0000128178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011408477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008609086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06224999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015978362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02698744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32921332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540088711","doi":"10.7202/1027783ar","title":"FREDERIC JAMESON. The Antinomies of Realism. London and New York: Verso, 2013. 326 pp.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Recherches sémiotiques","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realism; Philosophy; Art history; Semiotics; Humanities; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1713418925820399,"score_gpt":0.35733659234824366,"score_spread":0.18599469976620375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540088711","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041280765,0.8458213,0.0021477314,0.05320695,0.0058359043,0.000021105958,0.0005775306,0.00011429692,0.09186237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03109761,0.61183524,0.0072458903,0.016556973,0.006399546,0.0001747708,0.0006642279,0.0005311031,0.32549468],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986089,0.00052060076,0.00012740854,0.00017360624,0.00045546063,0.000114109745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672216,0.0021152154,0.00025564918,0.00013211412,0.0005984001,0.00017644916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020760729,0.0015912857,0.000746482,0.0035103806,0.00269967,0.0029851752,0.0012977145,0.0030308173,0.03526993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054900683,0.0010286219,0.0006242879,0.0029679732,0.004099061,0.010462815,0.0012761045,0.0043247947,0.012216007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042071104,0.000013878092,0.0001070914,0.00045837692,0.000009724803,0.00008588515,0.0020981522,0.00008612868,0.00014729323,0.07298662,0.8742748,0.04968993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009105951,0.000006193939,0.00061594974,0.0008679858,0.000007737036,0.00010413093,0.0007593893,0.000044971686,0.00015465029,0.034856107,0.9625552,0.000018560997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032900885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06525658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03526993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045597437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00364023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11798972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540181039","doi":"","title":"“Ocular Proof”: Photographs as Legal Evidence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archivaria (Association of Canadian Archivists)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Legislation; Humanities; Jurisprudence; Art; Law; Art history; Ethnology; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010545851474499462,"score_gpt":0.26141391948960485,"score_spread":0.2508680680151054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540181039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032636076,0.03581809,0.04837936,0.079505,0.0035226217,0.00021471558,0.00030155343,0.0001874827,0.79943514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82202095,0.020957628,0.031290133,0.013171179,0.0018533351,0.00021865433,0.00018200198,0.0001502431,0.11015586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99154145,0.004115152,0.0003561748,0.0006875903,0.002691369,0.00060841476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98718137,0.008252594,0.000818781,0.0018550319,0.0015734138,0.00031882527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062830183,0.00043090878,0.00038892106,0.003132932,0.0061235474,0.011067823,0.0023369894,0.004550395,0.012615175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02690092,0.00051234895,0.00048508344,0.0015063036,0.03380031,0.012898215,0.0057147522,0.004648173,0.001398856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015356345,0.000006413013,0.0003228534,0.00010725032,0.000005182976,0.00037328518,0.007691881,0.00011893716,0.00018739604,0.9624748,0.006949172,0.021747485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022534012,0.000038913713,0.0013082332,0.0015782374,0.000025646887,0.0008656531,0.012698934,0.00031341027,0.0014947932,0.28475314,0.69685173,0.000048825306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027981965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034998484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97201806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070916926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066737025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055638194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541310979","doi":"","title":"Bending the Gaze: An Ethnographic Inquiry into Contemporary Contortion","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gaze; Ethnography; Subject (documents); Geography; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Anthropology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04394501026730756,"score_gpt":0.30247414357390645,"score_spread":0.2585291333065989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541310979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9427505,0.0013282307,0.0026034417,0.007436728,0.00012580983,0.00008792278,0.0000705981,0.00005819521,0.045538638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99555415,0.00037840498,0.00040742455,0.000537624,0.000023444947,0.000046994446,0.00002037727,0.00005883944,0.0029727067],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.992151,0.0057657715,0.00013730084,0.00071332743,0.00047631687,0.0007562732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827513,0.014472174,0.0006779961,0.0005791835,0.00072246237,0.0007968537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068140635,0.0006691253,0.0007782391,0.0038773115,0.02427062,0.010924109,0.002333398,0.005021981,0.0051407814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024294185,0.001025482,0.00035152608,0.0029635404,0.026016092,0.013358461,0.00853607,0.008668783,0.00036101913],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058590945,0.0000060781767,0.00041192045,0.00001059302,8.175949e-7,0.00010439881,0.9963754,0.0000052252894,0.00013339537,0.0019877662,0.00015167803,0.0008068969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001812907,0.000008603109,0.00067958224,0.00005665287,0.0000023023892,0.00012925496,0.9911137,0.000038977294,0.000103973456,0.0008323467,0.0070257755,0.000006966185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027977386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04691357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027977386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046273037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003971289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055629075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1541873524","doi":"10.1002/9781118533727.ch24","title":"Law and Literature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.007125948115982669,"score_gpt":0.25911829087131305,"score_spread":0.2519923427553304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541873524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032381318,0.019746505,0.00094746595,0.010917894,0.0023519727,0.00003734432,0.0005928084,0.00012100979,0.9649612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012524984,0.04718625,0.0016719628,0.008051654,0.0035192103,0.00017376734,0.0012087604,0.00043976033,0.92522365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998128,0.00043839685,0.000105252926,0.00024624867,0.00089212286,0.0001898465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978211,0.0009072881,0.00012841498,0.0002493783,0.00068762305,0.00020610107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017944665,0.00064494205,0.00085594144,0.009192595,0.006963489,0.010699595,0.0014043547,0.0034664993,0.18759589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061358437,0.00036590663,0.00043263767,0.016626552,0.005622721,0.008640432,0.0033206504,0.0040378743,0.053628337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003756243,0.000028997982,0.00008627058,0.00021143079,0.0000022915315,0.00003101295,0.0007763405,0.00005973122,0.000037288974,0.41225222,0.5198158,0.06669487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.679843e-7,0.0000012388396,0.00011811276,0.00051336526,0.0000013003472,0.00001539386,0.00037909378,0.000023454728,0.000020679783,0.029894302,0.96902823,0.00000396701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023338666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04136026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18759589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008286578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010991929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62757075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1542324191","doi":"","title":"The Shattered Mirror: Identity, Authority, and Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Washington and Lee law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Politics; Identity politics; Identity (music); Sociology; Legitimacy; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.04071937850929979,"score_gpt":0.34448933514093133,"score_spread":0.30376995663163153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1542324191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19387811,0.031497113,0.0016869478,0.22530998,0.0008507089,0.000019303616,0.00006111005,0.00006762085,0.546629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97175455,0.0050064772,0.00026265057,0.0045004464,0.00022227837,0.00001167736,0.000012805981,0.00001754776,0.018211596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982316,0.0010577752,0.00003201298,0.00012526981,0.00032915117,0.00022417407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977354,0.0011527736,0.00023252437,0.00009729566,0.00018076146,0.00060116354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020841379,0.00013921822,0.00022124017,0.0012062013,0.011252941,0.010425247,0.0005777717,0.0017032009,0.0073030367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003411613,0.00019721773,0.000110307825,0.0010348744,0.026431894,0.009718048,0.003301887,0.003223702,0.0006935727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025976211,0.00009245508,0.007350236,0.00003900116,0.0000052551036,0.00029421868,0.11242623,0.000074341406,0.00008551757,0.7899488,0.050997004,0.038660895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023369621,0.00004355573,0.019852277,0.00049945473,0.000009253029,0.00049331563,0.2048696,0.00043095674,0.00015483846,0.48703697,0.2865418,0.0000447215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034952514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050130866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034952514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054574963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033108408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06949812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546268247","doi":"10.29173/alr142","title":"Restorative Justice, Euthanasia, and Assisted Suicide: A New Arena for Restorative Justice and a New Path for End of Life Law and Policy in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Assisted suicide; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Criminology; Law reform; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.11950733268043222,"score_gpt":0.35629231521797383,"score_spread":0.2367849825375416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546268247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063869506,0.09588339,0.0028888122,0.5990636,0.0020034735,0.00017177711,0.00018987934,0.00010582921,0.23582374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.762869,0.06319479,0.004750305,0.061837513,0.0006326296,0.00007584684,0.00016773267,0.00008578065,0.10638653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911862,0.0012110326,0.00023514604,0.00039779049,0.0041639116,0.0028059508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98820215,0.0026114644,0.00066378375,0.00019732183,0.004980304,0.0033448555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040550213,0.0003525559,0.0006274448,0.0027488074,0.022238431,0.0114198355,0.0032037026,0.006480752,0.005771432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010432654,0.0004885517,0.00051818346,0.0034478647,0.014210925,0.0033262607,0.0034813443,0.0061479,0.00029040079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045692774,0.000096443655,0.00642959,0.000502407,0.000030315638,0.0010214745,0.013165035,0.0012823315,0.00044317398,0.82224655,0.077728994,0.07700802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007517261,0.00006322946,0.031499553,0.0014255389,0.000072264455,0.00038012353,0.03504281,0.0020656763,0.0004995996,0.07184153,0.8567979,0.00023666694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99849486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26503906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26503906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5134655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8524505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546936607","doi":"10.14746/rpeis.2012.74.4.19","title":"Rozstrzyganie sporów pomiędzy jednostką i administracja˛ w systemach common law (refleksje na kanwie książki Sary Blake ADMINISTRATIVE LAW IN CANADA)","year":2012,"lang":"pl","type":"article","venue":"Ruch Prawniczy Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05375673583190675,"score_gpt":0.3201114132955465,"score_spread":0.2663546774636397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546936607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719187,0.00040931883,0.00021869334,0.0061780848,0.0000160182,0.00004596095,0.0011324037,0.000011980361,0.020068862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99480766,0.00021501677,0.00013050956,0.00014687753,0.0000042087763,0.000009881692,0.00023931103,0.000006491099,0.0044401577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962812,0.00031088613,0.000092858456,0.00034554052,0.0010939988,0.0018755234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941062,0.00066440954,0.0009230274,0.00016143043,0.002566518,0.0015784792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020134728,0.00015952799,0.00038775435,0.0021216078,0.0074573103,0.008142955,0.0009803575,0.0009870708,0.007395369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007285428,0.00027427444,0.00032451723,0.006353842,0.005980775,0.0018440755,0.0031984232,0.0021910947,0.0003096236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015415251,0.00017723904,0.671388,0.00014461209,0.000075025615,0.00071723165,0.1934263,0.0008996054,0.00066301756,0.07895645,0.016337136,0.037061308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069930256,0.00001746496,0.87826264,0.00007129445,0.000021720036,0.000071773284,0.10065345,0.00028493884,0.00024590592,0.0021288663,0.0181906,0.00004429324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06883399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06883399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10298772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4994279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548447123","doi":"10.14453/ltc.796","title":"Feminist Research in Crimino-Legal Studies: Reflections on 'Absolute Rubbish'","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law/text/culture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Absolute (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.3160228431874188,"score_gpt":0.48581511645599307,"score_spread":0.16979227326857427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1548447123","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067204684,0.08026738,0.009363734,0.6914679,0.005060908,0.00016500641,0.00011984511,0.000053992004,0.14629659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8731919,0.028325167,0.0034055896,0.051919397,0.0034295171,0.00047084346,0.00004637168,0.00028149394,0.038929652],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9505476,0.043161534,0.0004702969,0.0012154311,0.0027312592,0.0018740287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9439894,0.050990686,0.0012585839,0.0010660022,0.0015019539,0.0011933427],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04545209,0.0010138656,0.0013741656,0.0029166082,0.024093322,0.020583998,0.0032109164,0.008136857,0.008082434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03265051,0.0009453123,0.00043486236,0.0032855603,0.11148434,0.024956046,0.014902855,0.017195862,0.0008321924],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012893647,0.000027091597,0.00019869901,0.00022834953,0.00000392639,0.00027725688,0.5855711,0.000039068607,0.00016336596,0.3984014,0.007570344,0.0075064716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008234166,0.000031885884,0.00050047826,0.0014302068,0.000003276159,0.0002945026,0.5516054,0.000073586765,0.00035109834,0.062511735,0.3831687,0.000020884327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012182502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020083886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97590667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018319529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008005534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24037647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1548623200","doi":"10.25071/1718-4657.36707","title":"HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY MIND: OR,CONJECTURAL SAVAGES, FICTIONAL HUMANS AND THE PERFORMANCE OF RIGHTS","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Intersections conference journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sympathy; Human rights; Humanism; Feeling; Human rights movement; Popularity; Sociology; Human body; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Fundamental rights; Right to property; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.015478469323707665,"score_gpt":0.277157320567032,"score_spread":0.26167885124332435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1548623200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19251448,0.036454838,0.008140836,0.08182026,0.001075429,0.000023568435,0.000052990807,0.000050110437,0.6798675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97694707,0.0030440236,0.00085935136,0.0025640363,0.00022650836,0.00001375511,0.00001029885,0.000014907283,0.016320033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871635,0.00081883196,0.000026368973,0.000105264065,0.000166713,0.0001666324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986701,0.00088328274,0.00014193635,0.00009925183,0.00010324101,0.0001023131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020809784,0.00025618443,0.00018505858,0.0010840177,0.0046839383,0.0053168456,0.00046687006,0.0019676501,0.0026882489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028988393,0.00010559921,0.00016420956,0.00048991945,0.055310488,0.0068642953,0.0022388606,0.0030402709,0.0002359009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008611132,0.0000071632326,0.00021219981,0.000016138438,0.0000014108268,0.00005562971,0.045926984,0.000035411926,0.000081147504,0.9485206,0.0018351574,0.00329954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014044282,0.000030885003,0.0009510022,0.0002674403,0.0000036825506,0.00026622164,0.038167585,0.0001424062,0.00037848912,0.6103038,0.34945753,0.000016864054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029280763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041370494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053168456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031246436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012242846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022670925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549480545","doi":"10.1080/15228932.2011.537584","title":"Is Insanity a Demeaning Defense? Examining the Ethics of Offender Pathologization through the Lens of the Classics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Insanity; Punishment (psychology); HAMLET (protein complex); Insanity defense; Face (sociological concept); Economic Justice; Psychology; Criminology; Physiognomy; Psychoanalysis; Criminal justice; Law; Sociology; Literature; Social psychology; Art; Political science; Psychiatry; Social science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.2772349249450676,"score_gpt":0.4145125541412853,"score_spread":0.13727762919621772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549480545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06311135,0.0686228,0.018363727,0.28161064,0.0029805307,0.000049726583,0.000035229998,0.000087524495,0.5651385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9257721,0.014140637,0.004981816,0.013167833,0.0031956742,0.00008303173,0.0000139017175,0.00009052445,0.038554434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952701,0.0035312127,0.00009620991,0.00028587863,0.0005269136,0.0002897427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99340075,0.005261222,0.0004764604,0.00030597227,0.0003518795,0.00020371751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046044313,0.00049684773,0.0004453967,0.002268768,0.005235657,0.0073849172,0.0011408357,0.0052937204,0.0016610032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009115158,0.0002167957,0.00027036906,0.0011931509,0.08212002,0.0070550945,0.0033230865,0.0049159145,0.00031617182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065303625,0.0000036176596,0.00008471579,0.000047935046,0.0000018610592,0.000118196665,0.01333111,0.00008964033,0.000042978452,0.98020464,0.0027323263,0.003336344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009846997,0.000020174131,0.00027980882,0.0003385119,0.0000062177187,0.00062084786,0.016390033,0.00026096628,0.00022563477,0.8152849,0.16654843,0.000014709713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034386334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035552331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074209822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074209822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034105303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05384326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549958249","doi":"","title":"Cut-and-Paste Justice: A Case Comment on Cojocaru v. British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Supreme court; Presumption; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Secrecy","score_opus":0.005917120334027288,"score_gpt":0.25643364555781195,"score_spread":0.25051652522378465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549958249","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042259812,0.003660408,0.0015796315,0.81097996,0.0032619792,0.00009615242,0.0001387106,0.00008610816,0.13793723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2936373,0.0014953787,0.0010973355,0.6388393,0.001388068,0.00011546016,0.000049919665,0.0001379094,0.06323936],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98129886,0.003867184,0.0005833808,0.0018781107,0.0072698495,0.00510262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826324,0.011736142,0.00045177658,0.0005465374,0.0033300673,0.0013030736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010081089,0.00061538385,0.00093459873,0.0011680629,0.056020964,0.013800342,0.005565661,0.0382092,0.005147883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032476492,0.0012429684,0.0009964705,0.00270378,0.020128487,0.0034121042,0.0041315206,0.037172828,0.0008947107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093216935,0.00005251635,0.0021716382,0.000108100125,0.000037605692,0.0054147267,0.04396705,0.00041875415,0.0009183509,0.39168417,0.5438178,0.011316065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006906402,0.000076272205,0.0052232766,0.0007395161,0.0001433716,0.0014609377,0.06890236,0.0012318083,0.0021132424,0.045610245,0.8740159,0.00041405586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.817173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90256685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.182827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04981539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059027497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3678074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551655855","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2015.04.15","title":"Emerging Cultural Conflicts in Italy: A Challenge for Criminal Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.15830431585442728,"score_gpt":0.4103626533561591,"score_spread":0.25205833750173184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551655855","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33903995,0.030868273,0.00094892643,0.48727655,0.0015216212,0.00005525706,0.00006361468,0.000036109854,0.14018974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591213,0.008961896,0.0010964334,0.023401435,0.0018728478,0.000053775093,0.000044403245,0.000023574628,0.005424283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965749,0.0019530146,0.00009537136,0.00018098684,0.0004320472,0.0007636424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656063,0.0012044907,0.0007164527,0.00016518738,0.00033048016,0.0010227304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038205963,0.0002876406,0.00032385736,0.0013140524,0.006554657,0.008764146,0.0014256191,0.0033398482,0.0033375067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057693035,0.00020686678,0.00033002655,0.0012991471,0.011410935,0.0038853274,0.005828372,0.0047374615,0.00029744388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010925851,0.00025587127,0.0678434,0.00068561157,0.000054595734,0.009596667,0.18689467,0.00065586425,0.00066979387,0.36684203,0.0908011,0.27559114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004482005,0.00014259605,0.14186864,0.0028738503,0.00004145399,0.0096250195,0.34039107,0.0009617475,0.00020610816,0.10114209,0.4025956,0.00010701901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014175405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033906966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014175405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067970008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060273684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04931593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551669382","doi":"","title":"Recognizing Aboriginal Title: The Mabo Case and Indigenous Resistance to English-Settler Colonialism","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian aboriginal studies/Australian Aboriginal studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Politics; Colonialism; Law; Body politic; Publishing; Objectivity (philosophy); Sociology; Resistance (ecology); Indigenous rights; Notice; Media studies; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03364151202802562,"score_gpt":0.381163993695882,"score_spread":0.3475224816678564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551669382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28490433,0.031009931,0.000521492,0.09800107,0.0007704238,0.00005205134,0.00002310187,0.000016850077,0.58470076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94880706,0.0051875818,0.00017789585,0.0055381404,0.00029786665,0.000031219955,0.000006470655,0.000010348858,0.03994335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996117,0.0017284371,0.00008382642,0.00025346025,0.00066247786,0.0011547881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730706,0.0015242388,0.00034582143,0.000100539335,0.00022707011,0.0004952917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034517255,0.00022769067,0.0004884406,0.0010475572,0.013632326,0.008675071,0.0014907618,0.006012039,0.002861715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00539194,0.00031737896,0.0002030212,0.0013983579,0.022756875,0.0035886646,0.0055877045,0.004452159,0.00026110068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025727153,0.000025906196,0.0013309869,0.000105704785,0.000007285357,0.0038009405,0.47294787,0.000060941984,0.00042507862,0.5045518,0.010991009,0.0057267556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027944758,0.000067344205,0.014720258,0.0011536859,0.00003838028,0.003050504,0.5151282,0.0002408016,0.0005403086,0.052407622,0.41253546,0.00008952767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15747617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25941563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15747617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010573596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068451264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31311917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552566848","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-4469.2011.01275.x","title":"Exception to Excess: Tactical Use of the Law by Outgroups in Bias Crime Legislation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ingroups and outgroups; Law; Scrutiny; Jurisprudence; Criminal law; Political science; Coercion (linguistics); Legislation; Criminal justice; Identity (music); Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.2388118088467494,"score_gpt":0.35996690277129456,"score_spread":0.12115509392454515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552566848","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29520518,0.0011039823,0.018547775,0.05496387,0.00046282948,0.00009705066,0.00004488559,0.000088475936,0.629486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98409605,0.00015690064,0.0010892001,0.003876357,0.00009289913,0.000040236893,0.000010843007,0.000031876178,0.010605586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98517495,0.008070316,0.00044498718,0.0015895624,0.0023161126,0.0024040919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860486,0.008131464,0.0015918417,0.0020046225,0.0013160346,0.0009074877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014891533,0.00029410236,0.0004032285,0.0015310016,0.014586128,0.010929057,0.0021004835,0.006061405,0.005694081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02439997,0.00044056072,0.00047690258,0.0012097907,0.038585953,0.010371871,0.010476844,0.0067920936,0.0004691665],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028282819,0.000036332487,0.0038936643,0.000022017357,0.00000749566,0.00022550418,0.027645305,0.00014807386,0.00023817556,0.9524785,0.0037119002,0.01156473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073964606,0.00014114541,0.020771064,0.0005950735,0.00011572609,0.00047358233,0.0718702,0.0028821824,0.0020760344,0.66842246,0.23247235,0.00010640639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03539978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056759093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03539978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008123126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068613472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0787549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553094232","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1443324","title":"Must Feminist Judges Self-Identify as Feminist?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminist philosophy; Feminist theory; Feminist legal theory; Feminism; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.009106297341908478,"score_gpt":0.3018946563556172,"score_spread":0.2927883590137087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553094232","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074336745,0.0014939834,0.0052794064,0.60221213,0.0033856796,0.000049811937,0.000036916157,0.00006246899,0.3131428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8788935,0.0004028559,0.0010892478,0.08241068,0.0013416134,0.000057588408,0.000017564946,0.000060298233,0.035726573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9772815,0.0097786775,0.0004831814,0.0024176566,0.0055627576,0.0044762045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9557539,0.01982453,0.0058076307,0.0033490828,0.009906585,0.005358226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022853862,0.0002700939,0.00055609044,0.0013820048,0.013462492,0.012865389,0.0017251283,0.014234243,0.0062008807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.080785595,0.00047301853,0.00032330392,0.0007774416,0.028677788,0.009660567,0.004030207,0.010424997,0.0018725581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004067425,0.0000660975,0.00713822,0.000044201664,0.000019687703,0.00027330787,0.03509005,0.000057312758,0.00033387623,0.85125095,0.082847446,0.022838302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057233236,0.00006117201,0.007021776,0.00036327675,0.000033841694,0.00048606144,0.07324975,0.00046112377,0.0016121676,0.4903858,0.42617524,0.00009263552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007101295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016219206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022853862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005258487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0090834275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12086421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553215055","doi":"","title":"Pulsions créatrices. Baptiste Debombourg, Justice & prudence, Le Lieu, centre en art actuel, Québec, 26 octobre au 18 novembre 2012Baptiste Debombourg, Justice & prudence, Le Lieu, centre en art actuel, Québec, 26 octobre au 18 novembre 2012","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Inter : Art actuel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prudence; Humanities; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Political science; Theology; Law","score_opus":0.0165797078867613,"score_gpt":0.26936391446219704,"score_spread":0.25278420657543577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553215055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060331426,0.111911036,0.0010887027,0.19817342,0.05902454,0.0002766335,0.008998512,0.0005568536,0.61393714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008329662,0.005730628,0.00022369804,0.0048517333,0.0010567841,0.00003300994,0.00044517464,0.00009622931,0.9792331],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992281,0.00008766471,0.000022889259,0.000090281326,0.00035926382,0.00021179291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864274,0.00014285617,0.000051444065,0.00004636994,0.00077381096,0.0003427683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008183214,0.00091716053,0.0005158389,0.0011443457,0.009084543,0.0040343013,0.0011254187,0.0029599692,0.18315984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020409634,0.0005919486,0.00051040604,0.0016851096,0.0014468796,0.001414496,0.001704411,0.0045721754,0.025227446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015344656,0.00000888283,0.0001869096,0.000033989072,0.0000023663576,0.000043409094,0.00017689953,0.00003330158,0.000077605764,0.001880237,0.9884084,0.009132751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046926425,0.0000031494817,0.002343258,0.00004436078,0.0000016763373,0.00002813696,0.0003694018,0.000033434342,0.0000545791,0.00017626282,0.99693334,0.0000076887245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90853184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97128814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18315984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023968711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021512145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61273074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555265602","doi":"10.1353/ren.2007.0277","title":": <i>Solon and Thespis: Law and Theater in the English Renaissance</i>","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"The Renaissance; Index (typography); Classics; Media studies; Art; History; Humanities; Art history; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.012342731765103787,"score_gpt":0.2699097062494004,"score_spread":0.2575669744842966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555265602","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011082973,0.81489396,0.0012141367,0.08336339,0.020922787,0.000024443829,0.0003743103,0.00014909155,0.07794953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.039954133,0.57275766,0.0014686952,0.022928707,0.02019934,0.00007306953,0.0007559106,0.0003177744,0.34154472],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996037,0.0001297986,0.0000277828,0.00005304158,0.000134058,0.000051662824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994704,0.00020976874,0.00006195857,0.000019664169,0.00015081104,0.00008732228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076838996,0.0017073862,0.0005171756,0.0021601378,0.0014729756,0.0037662347,0.0012587658,0.0021215978,0.042109545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014994435,0.00039832987,0.00030496198,0.0038763024,0.001938778,0.010470598,0.0019589867,0.0022437377,0.013893401],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016137523,0.0000073661417,0.0001264366,0.00026699933,0.000004332004,0.000041839034,0.0012146719,0.000022877739,0.00007759534,0.007916503,0.9597386,0.03056657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003859156,0.00000763954,0.00082032796,0.0006538454,0.0000054272205,0.00016660521,0.0023951833,0.000034713827,0.00014281098,0.0032359976,0.9925237,0.000009944199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019404821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053072814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042109545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026355619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022324126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14087045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555465149","doi":"","title":"What is law critique?: immanent critique, institutional nihilism and projects of juridification","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Murdoch University; University of Cambridge; York University","keywords":"Nihilism; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.06202065012472275,"score_gpt":0.41266391408103087,"score_spread":0.3506432639563081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555465149","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11747543,0.016753988,0.008450119,0.28504312,0.0008545686,0.00004211536,0.00004458262,0.00008791091,0.5712481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883918,0.0010620386,0.00050557166,0.0024610723,0.0002460415,0.000028046548,0.000008495911,0.000038596827,0.0072582387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753887,0.017427957,0.00047826002,0.0015607257,0.0030881865,0.0020562755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97050834,0.019089574,0.0027753282,0.0028698978,0.0032412468,0.0015155423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021113127,0.0003331949,0.0007029709,0.0048938976,0.019521369,0.023683053,0.002582982,0.008907203,0.0043587117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04247382,0.0003369539,0.0004254581,0.0043406608,0.13648924,0.018657638,0.011144276,0.007702714,0.00038517138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004821885,0.000007294027,0.00038692486,0.000017836051,0.0000026527591,0.000037391117,0.031094782,0.00004639942,0.000023234572,0.96355814,0.0017357834,0.0030847117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014578734,0.000010153283,0.0010800248,0.00027963688,0.000009693497,0.00007840901,0.056909833,0.00031373,0.00016653512,0.8500269,0.091087915,0.000022535218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014634072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015253361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023683053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01926374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01601956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1397689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556173224","doi":"","title":"1. The Victories of Jane Doe","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Law; Point (geometry); Innocence; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.017377479560378075,"score_gpt":0.27703097119909426,"score_spread":0.2596534916387162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556173224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065575647,0.018811679,0.00087250234,0.2866347,0.010442178,0.00002769049,0.00009477181,0.00008671887,0.67647225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09877626,0.0075788484,0.0005987934,0.09821186,0.0019764586,0.000052286716,0.000057897047,0.00019011139,0.79255754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971902,0.00070043013,0.00004067999,0.00030089563,0.0010434119,0.00072451564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988555,0.00022027701,0.000052052124,0.000044135384,0.00043823526,0.0003899381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013740505,0.000490075,0.00041828578,0.00062193675,0.018006131,0.006931702,0.0009533451,0.0031296783,0.019348513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048856745,0.00038352993,0.00030609276,0.00070262223,0.0072747623,0.0060239583,0.004513686,0.008664428,0.0049434523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017885219,0.000013753989,0.00030220795,0.00005717302,0.0000034190216,0.0002972382,0.01939235,0.000024988856,0.00027194474,0.31594336,0.64997053,0.013705165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010740184,0.000004091605,0.000102643295,0.00004295359,8.3674803e-7,0.00010923634,0.005252646,0.0000066351013,0.000057321864,0.003388465,0.9910294,0.0000047114127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0985624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26185933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0985624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012726194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00881717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19597739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1556442966","doi":"","title":"Achieving Obligation in Information Organization: Some Novel Approaches","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Business; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.10461328857265331,"score_gpt":0.2994550990333529,"score_spread":0.19484181046069957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1556442966","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011539143,0.01518134,0.2788774,0.097521484,0.0020493353,0.0002715675,0.000117167445,0.00014723389,0.5942953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72024965,0.015202185,0.197841,0.009621753,0.004031697,0.0010435672,0.00013622167,0.00017201928,0.05170196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938361,0.003766523,0.00023614735,0.00063005876,0.0010666854,0.0004644116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99416476,0.0033915932,0.00050474965,0.0007613679,0.0007477006,0.00042983293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008200256,0.0008955047,0.0008256748,0.0046791253,0.006698956,0.012684229,0.0032139642,0.0057750423,0.007025913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007077765,0.00053580146,0.0018358032,0.003339198,0.049338263,0.019345937,0.00779283,0.0061465395,0.0010807558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020026791,0.000010822716,0.000025028849,0.000015284573,0.0000018066559,0.000031935484,0.00080597796,0.000116743526,0.000014005142,0.99676514,0.0006802054,0.001531079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007845436,0.00000760899,0.000059804148,0.00005622829,0.0000031603042,0.000064174434,0.00090566004,0.0013481876,0.00004504359,0.9792251,0.018268943,0.000008230324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044207387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050959755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013221901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013221901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004502766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09593207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1564998960","doi":"","title":"20. Judges and the Reasonable Steps Requirement: The Judicial Stance on Perpetration Against Unconscious Women","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Unconscious mind; Law; Resistance (ecology); Appeal; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.01772796447356191,"score_gpt":0.2621465639673306,"score_spread":0.2444185994937687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1564998960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.099528074,0.008691887,0.020625053,0.39370695,0.0040661646,0.00014722909,0.00005509667,0.00012235416,0.4730572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9125007,0.0009211895,0.002772581,0.0604194,0.0011919236,0.00014040964,0.000012040706,0.000057434612,0.02198431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751618,0.013629091,0.0011914267,0.0024324975,0.004675868,0.0029092743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752701,0.016839482,0.0017244064,0.0018448875,0.0033874023,0.0009338385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016532246,0.00041659377,0.0006901904,0.0011323532,0.012673324,0.011103463,0.0025975236,0.018583762,0.002190442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049346607,0.00045999838,0.00068040256,0.0004844668,0.047819335,0.006393068,0.0070766234,0.015652837,0.0005787373],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000093718945,0.000008588298,0.0002927706,0.000027185022,0.000005818736,0.00038709017,0.019197775,0.000045594516,0.000296954,0.9709056,0.006068032,0.0027552007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055325687,0.00010578167,0.002249885,0.00059079216,0.000040120718,0.00085504714,0.028219465,0.00053968484,0.0021753407,0.6754009,0.28964,0.00012756456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013260866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012477461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018583762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057205316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076155104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08743191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1565507466","doi":"","title":"Improvising (Il)Legality: Justice and the Irish Diaspora, N.Y.C., 1930-32","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Irish; Improvisation; Diaspora; Sociology; Economic Justice; Politics; Elite; Democracy; Principle of legality; Rule of law; Somali; Law; Media studies; Political science; Gender studies; Philosophy; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.02621877756978543,"score_gpt":0.2859321183430287,"score_spread":0.25971334077324326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1565507466","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68138,0.006881358,0.00038644273,0.055290077,0.00068797305,0.00013347933,0.00015591006,0.000030183064,0.2550546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93481094,0.0016858485,0.0001339098,0.00528581,0.00007129457,0.00007164149,0.000028852404,0.000023784296,0.057887916],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978935,0.0005150192,0.00004509308,0.00015434521,0.00023279754,0.0011592276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847513,0.00048721337,0.00020814451,0.00006753262,0.00022190278,0.0005400454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025772944,0.0003147829,0.00032120742,0.0007044006,0.026832044,0.0064560226,0.0014956034,0.0027355081,0.0038520321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00344402,0.00033442522,0.00018480484,0.0011763228,0.023862697,0.0029239794,0.0048644734,0.006956294,0.00035382767],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001390145,0.00013957602,0.0114541985,0.0001350085,0.000008116244,0.0021207067,0.79317623,0.00012512074,0.0006186697,0.120419726,0.036798686,0.03486499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022592236,0.000076502496,0.035321612,0.00027398832,0.000005579154,0.00027183004,0.6729172,0.00006560845,0.0005600641,0.0031716072,0.28723994,0.00007343182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68322176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87831247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68322176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03005094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02861373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6372876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566973766","doi":"10.29173/alr25","title":"Finding Order in Calgary's Cash Corner: Using Legal Pluralism to Craft Legal Remedies for Conflicts Involving Marginalized Persons in Public Spaces","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Craft; Legal pluralism; Public space; Charter; Law and economics; Order (exchange); Sociology; Political science; Law; Legal research; Legal realism; Business","score_opus":0.12139962307792568,"score_gpt":0.36228988623517433,"score_spread":0.24089026315724865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566973766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28013337,0.061945308,0.015480999,0.22073598,0.001325105,0.00057987263,0.000074564814,0.00016435428,0.41956037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94451874,0.014212803,0.0075604985,0.013707233,0.0001382999,0.00012313829,0.000035902227,0.000049622766,0.019653812],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98935914,0.0058586677,0.00023692126,0.0005558167,0.0018814965,0.0021079339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893239,0.0065681776,0.0007085603,0.00043577573,0.0019759056,0.0009876876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014537185,0.00030679393,0.00054415676,0.0031114048,0.025711587,0.012948203,0.0035546704,0.004655731,0.0031308285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024901506,0.0004546614,0.00037976922,0.0023367438,0.035270944,0.005334029,0.0062235096,0.006006026,0.00029560123],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035659763,0.00014794777,0.0063247425,0.00070652104,0.000041524032,0.0010161035,0.18316372,0.0009604499,0.00052030454,0.58834136,0.040349845,0.17839183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097053686,0.00011184638,0.019655308,0.0028316558,0.00020183214,0.00025519606,0.4016323,0.0012949985,0.0011012581,0.13052568,0.44217905,0.00011388018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7435828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89431316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2564172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035198566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10769867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5158546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570197997","doi":"","title":"Locating the Trans Legal Subject in Canadian Law: XY v. Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Subjectivity; Subject (documents); Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Political science; Law; Autonomy; Sociology; Epistemology; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006921758172566051,"score_gpt":0.23276075418598913,"score_spread":0.22583899601342308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570197997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3280506,0.009169078,0.0040457067,0.11433957,0.0007294933,0.00018486267,0.00048366148,0.00008341031,0.5429136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92570895,0.0032397995,0.0017984627,0.011143234,0.00008482444,0.000044628203,0.00008458411,0.000061364655,0.057834074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519014,0.0005068793,0.00011243389,0.0005311662,0.0019583122,0.0017009886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639326,0.0011830581,0.0002705457,0.000113691,0.001344492,0.00069489895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003905109,0.00033710396,0.00028103503,0.0017040637,0.04505636,0.0076981564,0.0019478375,0.0037966014,0.0032787824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006308542,0.00046621347,0.0003751971,0.0025505424,0.02143313,0.0026020117,0.003855314,0.0044583455,0.00020267694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004197373,0.000015404856,0.0072432836,0.00012740266,0.000011068053,0.0018264677,0.23493722,0.000358894,0.0014268891,0.7011376,0.032067858,0.020806039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026995776,0.000033770928,0.028113298,0.00047183054,0.000075529366,0.00058809173,0.14582624,0.0010640997,0.0013972241,0.029496115,0.792653,0.00025377667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.185497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.185497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24110422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94470805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570909106","doi":"10.14453/ltc.544","title":"Interstices: new work on legal spaces","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law/text/culture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.016183756394306397,"score_gpt":0.28737462317598383,"score_spread":0.2711908667816774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570909106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037119012,0.061598558,0.052593395,0.07171402,0.0034816612,0.000031941152,0.00012758403,0.00013172241,0.7732021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8837797,0.03651743,0.012699716,0.006982913,0.0037916068,0.00019710771,0.00016223073,0.00039599696,0.05547333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928865,0.0040825587,0.00030299998,0.0010463657,0.0011252287,0.000556271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97900164,0.016124811,0.0011046418,0.0019035002,0.0008936027,0.00097181136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063225166,0.0007893701,0.0009914057,0.006546915,0.012153333,0.019535128,0.00268477,0.0046972954,0.016731424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016983861,0.0006782752,0.0011373314,0.0070524807,0.06662958,0.04051692,0.01123462,0.009959487,0.001212391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034796553,0.0000038373287,0.00008448172,0.000022134125,0.0000018030535,0.000023353474,0.006340793,0.000053256248,0.000014710124,0.9898755,0.00096447114,0.0026120923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010390152,0.000009443052,0.00023044735,0.00026395152,0.000008109689,0.00011690906,0.0107588405,0.00038575265,0.00007839903,0.8257917,0.16233407,0.000011922573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075548487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008045432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019535128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008914661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004465702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064680696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1577306393","doi":"10.1108/pm.2012.30.2.209.1","title":"Law and the Built Environment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Property Management","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Krell Institute; Royal Bank of Canada","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.023786075258109773,"score_gpt":0.24474127646804555,"score_spread":0.22095520120993578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1577306393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040841818,0.04408188,0.0065169185,0.117952205,0.00061384327,0.000028546836,0.00011821417,0.00005296994,0.78979355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92705846,0.0077696256,0.0012803401,0.0072501106,0.00071713526,0.00004345163,0.000037915455,0.000027892522,0.05581506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899906,0.0005134616,0.000022085384,0.00014258994,0.00015409608,0.00016870789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986033,0.0008517098,0.00011825682,0.00014464279,0.0001175702,0.00016451592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014921223,0.00027379213,0.00029152763,0.0009081132,0.003787044,0.008392338,0.00067562197,0.005264397,0.008267581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028399848,0.00020255022,0.00024631503,0.0010805284,0.029257983,0.005337749,0.0023556487,0.0037597388,0.00066701474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033243555,0.000013751817,0.00029100841,0.00000911489,0.0000023922157,0.000024764438,0.0010023805,0.00016155036,0.000029086703,0.99204975,0.0030167566,0.0033962696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056410663,0.000011398483,0.00076278875,0.00006758214,0.000003639358,0.000033318287,0.0017905539,0.00023630363,0.00006221169,0.89061385,0.106405675,0.0000070762244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012674051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016281683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012674051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029250628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036160443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027657807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1580699272","doi":"","title":"Fantasm of Permanence and The Monologic of Empire","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Public law; Civil law (Civil law); Comparative law; Private law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Criminal procedure; Scholarship; Criminal code; Philosophy of law; Theory of criminal justice; Legislation; Coercion (linguistics); Criminal justice; Philosophy","score_opus":0.034205243533019625,"score_gpt":0.341675991234998,"score_spread":0.30747074770197835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1580699272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03514889,0.00835964,0.015557728,0.091959335,0.0014753516,0.00003127313,0.000092391245,0.00012748668,0.84724796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92412305,0.0020254164,0.0032535857,0.006430456,0.000638504,0.00007291864,0.00005776774,0.00026027145,0.06313803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934656,0.0042607547,0.0001462305,0.0010021037,0.00062064826,0.0005045712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568,0.0019252413,0.0002954057,0.001057123,0.0005416451,0.0005006198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006796337,0.00055374287,0.0005437342,0.001938742,0.012229427,0.009307198,0.0011038145,0.0026647018,0.007778137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008928148,0.00040585824,0.00045509462,0.00082567247,0.09125599,0.016632939,0.006694161,0.0074357702,0.0014846949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007805935,0.0000046585988,0.00012927805,0.000011989189,0.000002269011,0.000033052045,0.009090619,0.00002252486,0.000040588468,0.9863644,0.0023860957,0.0019066943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019974443,0.00003267688,0.0005725919,0.00012397123,0.000006505869,0.00022920314,0.008999243,0.00016870185,0.00014035955,0.7273812,0.26230684,0.000018655766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005592751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065011363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012229427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055606966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032740186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040345848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1581933610","doi":"10.4324/9780203810774","title":"The V-chip Debate","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Government (linguistics); The Internet; Media studies; Political science; Rating system; Advertising; Sociology; Law; Economics; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017711661196879534,"score_gpt":0.2669399983787665,"score_spread":0.24922833718188694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1581933610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031354965,0.2740605,0.0007015828,0.092400305,0.015327494,0.00003914858,0.00065130007,0.00018349085,0.61632264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009901898,0.11004575,0.00086365646,0.043378223,0.009540461,0.000072280105,0.0005838483,0.00027351818,0.8253405],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989484,0.00014918506,0.000029023013,0.00014684553,0.00061959145,0.00010689569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990934,0.00023102821,0.000036727393,0.000056640903,0.00048249977,0.00009974899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000964074,0.0007106473,0.00053048524,0.0019839809,0.0036612707,0.0060231104,0.0013550537,0.0034482381,0.06923045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003683883,0.00033042228,0.0003291982,0.0038600015,0.0033309574,0.0049471688,0.001696617,0.0037946503,0.026823644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002706142,0.000003269371,0.000022356098,0.000058767106,6.7545443e-7,0.0000066881025,0.000098034565,0.000019353589,0.000018755101,0.03636109,0.9478867,0.0155215245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.837777e-7,7.102497e-7,0.00009062695,0.00013996396,4.6612195e-7,0.000011008607,0.000055386303,0.00000747472,0.000011526308,0.0028638616,0.9968168,0.0000015596916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20075382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26387978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20075382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015998807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011897088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39917058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582191770","doi":"","title":"Special Semiotic Characters: What is an Obstacle-Sign?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Sign (mathematics); Punitive damages; Exposition (narrative); Obstacle; Biopower; Michel foucault; Sociology; Focus (optics); Aesthetics; Politics; Epistemology; Art; Political science; Philosophy; Literature; Law","score_opus":0.23757751344959713,"score_gpt":0.5315704771097001,"score_spread":0.29399296366010297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582191770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13354188,0.004252353,0.03450036,0.031420127,0.0025994922,0.00006181856,0.00006483752,0.00016225118,0.79339683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98009676,0.0006778906,0.002044599,0.0009513025,0.00023634871,0.00003085723,0.000019990393,0.000083240266,0.015858913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951761,0.0035354584,0.00010733871,0.00028542642,0.00055159966,0.00034397983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761546,0.0010712402,0.0002905296,0.00032097605,0.00034664586,0.00035513003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024367815,0.00048812554,0.00044763618,0.0009888578,0.0067521622,0.008800063,0.000684623,0.0021643126,0.003927962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067768567,0.00024181887,0.00029526747,0.000836027,0.036830235,0.007661291,0.005995852,0.0041666715,0.0011381741],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028442915,0.000011870528,0.00052012707,0.00006229911,0.0000033906713,0.00028782323,0.08145926,0.000034880104,0.00032768096,0.9074381,0.0033521552,0.006473911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022709684,0.00014128405,0.0011690457,0.00047208834,0.00002003144,0.0021634845,0.14353558,0.0004968221,0.0013492652,0.27629304,0.57427436,0.000062267005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009619124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014743761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008800063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014501385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011407993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01314038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1582511637","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.275470","title":"Labour and Intersubjectivity: Notes on the Natural Law of Copyright","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Intersubjectivity; Natural (archaeology); Copyright law; Natural law; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Intellectual property; Philosophy; Epistemology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.008704049857891695,"score_gpt":0.26440793410932156,"score_spread":0.25570388425142987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1582511637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053455394,0.0155582735,0.050599173,0.07491455,0.0008005278,0.000066493456,0.00013343275,0.000039206865,0.8044329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95610905,0.0043011038,0.00509495,0.00407925,0.0012426827,0.00018665438,0.000040556304,0.000063149084,0.028882708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623317,0.0020630697,0.0001221304,0.0005702558,0.0005250653,0.00048642268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98710907,0.010852996,0.00049951184,0.00083382166,0.00046073945,0.00024391507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073404005,0.00047046953,0.00080465886,0.0016366163,0.007047907,0.01175855,0.0017656923,0.009626703,0.0093751615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014238854,0.00049718266,0.0011125269,0.0025646887,0.075889245,0.019849345,0.005146777,0.008837004,0.00067428115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015125312,0.0000019099373,0.000016489617,0.0000030908352,5.636661e-7,0.0000074450245,0.00054340967,0.000024671855,0.0000051129196,0.99887127,0.00027753803,0.00024691265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004544696,0.0000015881565,0.00004617266,0.000018084596,0.0000011235572,0.000008843625,0.0003181247,0.000090901805,0.000020011981,0.99401385,0.005473432,0.0000033490292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010436563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008836502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01175855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055223946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040590405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04006803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583695688","doi":"","title":"Parody as Fair Dealing in Canada: A Guide for Lawyers and Judges","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Criticism; Political science; Jurisprudence; Charter; Legislature; Maxim; Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.007402679848442651,"score_gpt":0.272820046923865,"score_spread":0.26541736707542235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583695688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058890902,0.0639163,0.06097106,0.31041786,0.0043202774,0.0042470996,0.003051445,0.0021899529,0.5449969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12989487,0.10714993,0.17802773,0.15335004,0.002481873,0.009368197,0.0027093675,0.0024478694,0.41457024],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97694165,0.0062310467,0.0020182044,0.0011650724,0.009892392,0.0037516449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688364,0.011724837,0.0010321252,0.0009636231,0.013578019,0.0038649347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021489099,0.0017034392,0.0018641585,0.0059354794,0.032874078,0.02225087,0.0076537724,0.018001853,0.016603857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047740575,0.002724598,0.001063258,0.012660276,0.019462205,0.011750846,0.0066536064,0.015549647,0.006618584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001810575,0.0001391716,0.0010206323,0.00030111193,0.000006932212,0.000583714,0.017004544,0.0011207763,0.00030729835,0.22735356,0.6809685,0.071175635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022497095,0.000018487435,0.0014726641,0.00078902446,0.000008277339,0.0001522448,0.009841718,0.001339895,0.00009936213,0.046110563,0.9400451,0.000100240715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9096024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9622431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09853998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09853998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28567374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71496093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583866105","doi":"","title":"Unencumbered by Delusions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.019586119770103286,"score_gpt":0.2938653905367758,"score_spread":0.2742792707666725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583866105","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42283282,0.0014933145,0.0015221924,0.07728723,0.0009989609,0.00008517364,0.00019321984,0.000096008,0.49549106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96653473,0.00036787274,0.00016181283,0.006319871,0.000099911944,0.000019351257,0.000028302067,0.000036842725,0.026431387],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896706,0.0036051872,0.00020342653,0.0005586425,0.003661959,0.0023003186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97279257,0.0097468635,0.002854398,0.0033872079,0.008065017,0.003154056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00661257,0.00027870853,0.00032233048,0.0014115638,0.01664667,0.0065482017,0.0015093201,0.0030487683,0.008747141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049136266,0.00038679448,0.00033273874,0.001360746,0.022358824,0.004269359,0.0046720007,0.0059479615,0.0007518754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017072776,0.00009250564,0.02612461,0.0001007141,0.000026750871,0.0016783187,0.545836,0.00009116263,0.0018360382,0.30311772,0.055948123,0.06497741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003994824,0.00005303893,0.044165034,0.00043371844,0.00004181951,0.0010748653,0.50475246,0.0002980589,0.0012810952,0.06464647,0.3831279,0.000085520245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44417349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57708585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44417349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0147023685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024025204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8831762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1587816057","doi":"","title":"Character Attacks as Complex Strategies of Legal Argumentation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Argument (complex analysis); Character (mathematics); Rhetorical question; Jury; Epistemology; Supreme court; Prejudice (legal term); Political science; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020202449917011974,"score_gpt":0.3319621008922386,"score_spread":0.3117596509752266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1587816057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4743674,0.0011948895,0.38126317,0.0026353127,0.00009520596,0.0006440868,0.00013000138,0.0002984986,0.1393715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93918985,0.00019582422,0.055247303,0.000098146535,0.000034781286,0.00025309558,0.00005419081,0.0000499291,0.0048769265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.990017,0.0063237203,0.00044735556,0.0008045422,0.0018420757,0.00056529144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820036,0.011417744,0.0030760362,0.0018400426,0.000869134,0.0007933572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004672688,0.0010894488,0.00053329085,0.0042109187,0.0022028973,0.009863245,0.0013253645,0.0026794295,0.00489833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021592997,0.00045276643,0.00093663833,0.0019508102,0.011083422,0.008242753,0.0042483555,0.0018255537,0.0006562155],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006528023,0.000050650633,0.0031175371,0.00011302617,0.000060433737,0.00032253662,0.013845206,0.006237846,0.0020227318,0.9554556,0.00044860438,0.018260455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055239743,0.00010991896,0.003422449,0.00010256631,0.00004596578,0.00049794227,0.007845993,0.046919875,0.0012424184,0.91564393,0.024061248,0.000052417676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042465684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005007531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009863245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017580439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007706379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024711847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1589306392","doi":"","title":"Parent, Child, Husband, Wife: When Recognition Fails, Tragedy Ensues","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy (event); Wife; Narrative; Confusion; Promiscuity; Drama; Social recognition; Psychology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Literature; Social psychology; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.0659089534730652,"score_gpt":0.2354986400982929,"score_spread":0.16958968662522772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1589306392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.349664,0.010381396,0.016615568,0.15786023,0.0021421097,0.00008486075,0.00015440775,0.00014921832,0.46294823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9699451,0.0020805649,0.001032824,0.005142624,0.00010703106,0.000020245745,0.00002460773,0.00002100756,0.021625934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981993,0.0008891957,0.000063096755,0.00012682818,0.0003731179,0.00034842928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990671,0.0003133319,0.0001851317,0.000047018188,0.00016419977,0.00022326973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018665271,0.00015606746,0.00022390258,0.00029372406,0.005595645,0.002947079,0.00047616218,0.0022172756,0.0038122097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006281497,0.00016983677,0.00011008862,0.00043014335,0.006722557,0.0032907028,0.0031512117,0.0032929122,0.0007345183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027617163,0.000039261784,0.013171165,0.00007748261,0.000010090243,0.015658433,0.35755205,0.00015939785,0.00065083645,0.49816972,0.05404085,0.06044318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011779289,0.0000898014,0.012926213,0.0005358687,0.00001762958,0.027740538,0.38656417,0.00033261123,0.000865782,0.04971368,0.5211333,0.00006866715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03828996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04191594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03828996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025352922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006330658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076134205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590568220","doi":"","title":"Digital Locks and the Automation of Virtue","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Lock (firearm); Virtue; State (computer science); Power (physics); Control (management); Internet privacy; Law and economics; Law; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0030390340414359787,"score_gpt":0.23556933714059658,"score_spread":0.2325303030991606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590568220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059721023,0.0032108806,0.021168917,0.012747828,0.00015260601,0.00004754279,0.000029981547,0.00011745438,0.9028038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97226804,0.00087533076,0.0025127113,0.0010397065,0.00006085724,0.00003198375,0.000010568235,0.000024736772,0.02317607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971102,0.0011763497,0.00007765145,0.0003168407,0.0007002898,0.00061874517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978034,0.00092309876,0.00024916133,0.000527631,0.000259428,0.00023730945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024179986,0.00024089309,0.00020926964,0.00089014444,0.0045245257,0.007958884,0.0006028872,0.0014860647,0.005544519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035190582,0.00022826887,0.0003318416,0.00069134356,0.05337588,0.0059603425,0.0047528986,0.0029328356,0.00057391165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033824845,0.000003281363,0.00014417627,0.000006886798,6.801837e-7,0.00001327422,0.0014523912,0.00013339748,0.00004237825,0.99514055,0.0004319715,0.002627618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016841688,0.000023127594,0.0016660357,0.00008706132,0.000004168169,0.00009124288,0.0019430808,0.0007585257,0.0003853941,0.8237545,0.17125149,0.000018554554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022037182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022799337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022037182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00782905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066281427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05680406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1592918228","doi":"10.47925/2006.059","title":"Framing Trials for Past Abuses Through an “Educative Dialogue”: Recovering the Formative Role of Conflict in a Democracy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy of education","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Democracy; Framing (construction); Formative assessment; Epistemology; Dialogic; Sociology; Unanimity; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Law; Pedagogy; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0847777350757221,"score_gpt":0.37679007039409207,"score_spread":0.29201233531836995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1592918228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15124218,0.006670946,0.19752808,0.21824904,0.002439194,0.00052844826,0.000073957905,0.00020603107,0.42306215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642933,0.0012899492,0.019427463,0.0061864285,0.00034130865,0.0003650886,0.000022068414,0.00008858037,0.007985843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95380175,0.040954266,0.0006213159,0.0009805766,0.0021754992,0.0014667027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9462628,0.046586353,0.0023601921,0.002029521,0.0019390788,0.000822135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037831888,0.00066603004,0.00059170637,0.0021146638,0.012458016,0.014021566,0.0027912718,0.0076133916,0.0037535229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049519468,0.00042030826,0.00062918384,0.0012986072,0.08119981,0.018551921,0.010884889,0.011228249,0.0003598637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018341447,0.000023226792,0.00029654716,0.00007234251,0.000004673495,0.00016258092,0.10476577,0.00033865974,0.00008881673,0.8852956,0.0021329895,0.006800434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005997125,0.00007310925,0.00065095356,0.0009006852,0.000022389646,0.0001437596,0.14091063,0.0019173414,0.0011163331,0.7316032,0.12254621,0.0000555063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044707414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067662834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037831888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00892806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00966923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20007652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593156584","doi":"","title":"Reconciling Tort and Administrative Law Concepts of Justice: The Case of Historical Wrongs","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Plaintiff; Statute; Law; Tort; Political science; Economic Justice; Compensation (psychology); Government (linguistics); Sociology; Liability; Psychology","score_opus":0.051655507180995396,"score_gpt":0.3224984108566674,"score_spread":0.27084290367567204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593156584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21695554,0.013500869,0.068967864,0.17054357,0.0012238914,0.00016802616,0.000047148667,0.00009241417,0.5285006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98597604,0.001071087,0.0026133335,0.0031218324,0.00024137515,0.00004577454,0.000007603385,0.000018918516,0.0069040814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9678746,0.017558916,0.0007821927,0.0014114778,0.0063839396,0.0059888805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97777504,0.014595086,0.0019532533,0.0024994048,0.0018967598,0.0012804039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02880184,0.0005398705,0.0008648245,0.0035525346,0.024039878,0.022500893,0.003555464,0.015259567,0.0026623216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028637996,0.00069401076,0.00079353846,0.0032086738,0.14405939,0.018667126,0.013454174,0.011894548,0.00021970774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026970288,0.000003842745,0.00017268772,0.0000059530544,0.0000016633892,0.00010050477,0.0076006996,0.00011885044,0.000013507965,0.99065477,0.00037728448,0.00094751536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002007663,0.000021126585,0.0010959896,0.00019880546,0.000019826688,0.00034662272,0.03337158,0.0011723244,0.0001902033,0.91244197,0.051080946,0.00004052768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07522319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0767848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07522319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03134678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025132682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22743791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W159330088","doi":"10.15173/mjc.v2i0.228","title":"The (Step)motherly Ideal: The Role of Sex, Gender and Stereotype in the Aurore Gagnon Murder Trial","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The McMaster Journal of Communication","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideal (ethics); Stereotype (UML); Psychology; Homicide; Criminology; Social psychology; Poison control; Injury prevention; Political science; Medicine; Medical emergency; Law","score_opus":0.03136856473249565,"score_gpt":0.31138773591299523,"score_spread":0.28001917118049957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W159330088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74214023,0.001735517,0.0010848709,0.0231434,0.00041425135,0.000020205063,0.00003860559,0.000015862268,0.23140702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98993874,0.000293468,0.00013020987,0.001485592,0.00003194444,0.0000054072857,0.000005928884,0.000007905928,0.00810083],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975702,0.0012474193,0.000031202795,0.00012805413,0.00049797416,0.0005252242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826825,0.0008335892,0.00030064725,0.00008165323,0.00025108954,0.0002647359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021592758,0.00021638122,0.00026964518,0.0005518232,0.012054863,0.0049679717,0.000643314,0.0015207921,0.0028334106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054603904,0.0001690422,0.00011973802,0.00026492903,0.01977466,0.0018515026,0.0027202338,0.0033315162,0.0002447363],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012683876,0.000061548555,0.017324122,0.00004304513,0.000011736995,0.0021632917,0.6726317,0.000112844464,0.001125918,0.27285585,0.010030896,0.023512293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028125869,0.00011928207,0.029138647,0.00035706264,0.000024951976,0.001495554,0.76849085,0.00033429565,0.0011685704,0.01925806,0.179515,0.000069637885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2080453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38815978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7919547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00924357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053495825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4136687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1593600024","doi":"10.24908/ss.v11i3.4556","title":"Justicia’s Gaze: Surveillance, Evidence and the Criminal Trial","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Criminal justice; Gaze; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03246238066296805,"score_gpt":0.30610372675250763,"score_spread":0.2736413460895396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1593600024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042271394,0.046207022,0.0032792704,0.1986344,0.0017751293,0.000054401433,0.00013103538,0.00005135723,0.707596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9133408,0.020372367,0.0009887351,0.014742337,0.0012542575,0.00008003467,0.000078717465,0.00007943441,0.04906327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940759,0.0036763954,0.00016063509,0.00052975677,0.0009272571,0.000629928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99274135,0.004811076,0.0007994046,0.00049185724,0.0007629456,0.00039337357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036145274,0.0003417875,0.00040790328,0.0023274214,0.010059209,0.010351217,0.00097377476,0.006742728,0.011288723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015988518,0.00025186833,0.00034007337,0.0026099698,0.022378908,0.011447236,0.007190138,0.005892409,0.0010836724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040161463,0.000021264234,0.0021521077,0.00019661766,0.000015340625,0.0011113477,0.112988666,0.00013501884,0.0003493642,0.80016243,0.044307746,0.038519844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021081143,0.000047382113,0.0063481852,0.0014899418,0.00002005317,0.0009834699,0.103652336,0.0002498774,0.00025681793,0.16857547,0.7182894,0.000065975175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07256275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.079433806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07256275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006984964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047663767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14428079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594546993","doi":"","title":"Film as a Complement to the Written Text: Reflections on Using the Sterilization of Leilani Muir to Teach Muir v. Alberta","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Eugenics; Law; Imprisonment; Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.058573999492953145,"score_gpt":0.3549776503828391,"score_spread":0.29640365088988596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594546993","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28935453,0.019796947,0.0046697,0.3480722,0.009523226,0.00036951498,0.00018517961,0.00025175576,0.327777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8182399,0.008830136,0.002530796,0.050277807,0.0010524844,0.00028890485,0.00006625651,0.00034348536,0.11837017],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889682,0.008081874,0.000114052054,0.00043790435,0.0010033725,0.0013946424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98946136,0.007874677,0.0003892406,0.0002777607,0.0007321252,0.00126483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009519508,0.0005961205,0.0005004024,0.0007210256,0.023287602,0.0075452877,0.0024267063,0.0055273906,0.010401588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01896983,0.0006627953,0.0003295794,0.0008378808,0.015061002,0.004668735,0.0068894583,0.015403212,0.0012234336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005975536,0.00014043857,0.0004852138,0.00019630378,0.000007224323,0.0012744789,0.84150124,0.00007052353,0.0015372321,0.021524016,0.10154605,0.031657454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026057252,0.00010364389,0.0013607469,0.0004684608,0.000014312756,0.00029845245,0.5342071,0.00008070394,0.00093446276,0.0018323456,0.46064577,0.000027983757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.114403956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27746725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88559604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013650324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011186319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22747612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595489811","doi":"","title":"Cultural timelessness and colonial tethers: Australian native title in historical and comparative perspective","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Jurisprudence; Law; Politics; Psyche; Humanity; Context (archaeology); Morality; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; History; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03514717545350124,"score_gpt":0.24889138809137673,"score_spread":0.2137442126378755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595489811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6262143,0.026840646,0.001106247,0.040255792,0.0007912085,0.000022819042,0.000039448118,0.000013588656,0.30471602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878939,0.0039254287,0.00014808163,0.0011445072,0.00015502254,0.000012485663,0.000007742033,0.00000934664,0.006703549],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951886,0.0031572792,0.00011013263,0.0003313728,0.00049247337,0.00072013354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961914,0.002188037,0.00053735793,0.00022764149,0.00035735572,0.00049824384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005990262,0.00023591214,0.00047815253,0.0029054086,0.017575582,0.010031607,0.0013095869,0.0026484998,0.003765178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070391824,0.00031546515,0.00019068821,0.004010398,0.044796254,0.0086726975,0.008032557,0.0039214897,0.00014420912],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000931526,0.000010994927,0.0008961937,0.00007002788,0.0000035348683,0.000404166,0.8021682,0.000022205662,0.000080863065,0.19073197,0.0008041592,0.0047984226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005107011,0.000050416747,0.011234986,0.00052443723,0.000012182309,0.00073834567,0.7458351,0.0001274619,0.00013949042,0.035793602,0.20550995,0.000029035435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08709751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14593942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08709751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013235154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055781608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17318112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596709651","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190456368.003.0019","title":"Legal and Literary Fictions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Premise; Legal fiction; Literature; Scholarship; Philosophy; Doctrine; Law; History; Art; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.020498370888614743,"score_gpt":0.2403590380402787,"score_spread":0.21986066715166394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596709651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00344938,0.042098604,0.0010018739,0.011406551,0.0021723346,0.000022825636,0.000055812445,0.000054681335,0.93973804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29323402,0.051290568,0.0024484405,0.011288811,0.009107238,0.00019335427,0.00031382713,0.00032349216,0.6318003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759334,0.0011316761,0.000080205275,0.00025015045,0.00074288127,0.00020178437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99601966,0.002770132,0.00023435039,0.0003229104,0.0004443793,0.0002085439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011417788,0.0006479705,0.00043592777,0.003842447,0.0058631646,0.008680285,0.0008293825,0.002786902,0.017385567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068467893,0.00021922246,0.00029863388,0.003058318,0.021707604,0.0068829786,0.0034888193,0.0034070231,0.0037411244],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053253293,0.000011232361,0.00006225053,0.00014486995,0.0000022986712,0.00014510113,0.009058695,0.00007365003,0.00007553859,0.91452384,0.054631595,0.021265559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002319798,0.000008211859,0.00015462149,0.00043643016,0.0000016680999,0.0002062917,0.0015271921,0.00005849236,0.00007193852,0.064331524,0.9331966,0.000004617272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019201445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00246539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017385567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049078367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022221631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058160543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598197424","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9337.2012.00520.x","title":"Dworkin and Phenomenology of the “Pre‐Legal”?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01347234198795746,"score_gpt":0.27637469330809306,"score_spread":0.2629023513201356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598197424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16224998,0.031667855,0.023920983,0.21109603,0.0012385944,0.0001930466,0.00014801635,0.0000867357,0.5693988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98296404,0.003618927,0.001977903,0.0036461975,0.00016273891,0.000089658344,0.000021949878,0.000020565036,0.0074980687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620515,0.0029492225,0.00007793379,0.00026188695,0.00031758274,0.0001883337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967642,0.002271509,0.00024597693,0.00026753766,0.00021922756,0.00023154094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041024415,0.0002933524,0.0003220267,0.0016314152,0.0062176553,0.007279123,0.0009860815,0.0022679672,0.0040164213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058328253,0.00023508607,0.00024785785,0.0013542405,0.058619186,0.013838611,0.0037918645,0.0037720879,0.00025937826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008102358,0.000014763351,0.00011906793,0.00002928004,8.771258e-7,0.00006006384,0.022545306,0.000047250607,0.00006748041,0.9742783,0.0013324373,0.0014970605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015223044,0.00001242362,0.00033945314,0.00021091662,0.0000018008285,0.00012926945,0.052741256,0.0002661536,0.000104104365,0.86755395,0.07861271,0.000012789221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074224295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044009904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009529648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009529648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003564905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06914276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1601585669","doi":"","title":"Note from the Guest Editors","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archivaria","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Greenwich; Legislation; Theme (computing); History; Law; Gay rights; Sodomy; Homosexuality; Media studies; Sociology; Politics; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.009411589965636171,"score_gpt":0.2782898911024502,"score_spread":0.26887830113681405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1601585669","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022143428,0.0030449454,0.00045562853,0.12741575,0.8288621,0.00012425377,0.0003240184,0.00035874802,0.039193146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032175253,0.003566115,0.0008763929,0.15524143,0.32318774,0.00033285923,0.0004120652,0.0005651254,0.5126008],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953819,0.00056665484,0.00039202286,0.0008579781,0.002290677,0.0005106627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97609234,0.002781873,0.0010960948,0.0012724135,0.014392405,0.0043649212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004561461,0.0016691604,0.0010466675,0.00168622,0.00463959,0.008789904,0.0026376608,0.007103417,0.1549909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032311,0.00073949475,0.0010675128,0.0012110964,0.0010414534,0.0047161775,0.0042957175,0.011254882,0.14597005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006642517,0.0000042168926,0.000028270233,0.000024213557,6.4135094e-7,0.000037382142,0.000020819753,0.000004102695,0.000043407283,0.00029511657,0.99526334,0.0042720013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035684272,0.0000065284953,0.00009327835,0.000044809763,0.0000013862322,0.00007455723,0.00007896321,0.000014929247,0.000045236215,0.00019452654,0.99943656,0.0000056382296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021160548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004624397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1549909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023127263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005249568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5184962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1602974617","doi":"","title":"Ingrid Bachmann. On Truth and Lies in the stricto sensu. Ingrid Bachmann, Pinocchio’s Dilemma, 2007 May 11 – June 11, 2012Ingrid Bachmann, Pinocchio’s Dilemma, 2007 May 11 – June 11, 2012","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Espace Sculpture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sensu stricto; Dilemma; Philosophy; Art history; Art; Biology; Epistemology; Zoology","score_opus":0.013802783208862164,"score_gpt":0.2648737485764877,"score_spread":0.2510709653676255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1602974617","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00066864875,0.24961638,0.00058078417,0.50924695,0.024041044,0.0000308267,0.00035310865,0.000103858416,0.2153584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07341517,0.14066006,0.0010742036,0.14399299,0.02765954,0.00016282403,0.00035098888,0.00029091092,0.6123934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998892,0.00034766205,0.000042051684,0.00020772048,0.00032606826,0.00018457572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915457,0.00037483172,0.00009004168,0.00004638866,0.00014826347,0.00018583657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001012492,0.0013150433,0.00044185272,0.00093597546,0.0055098752,0.0033510844,0.0011157314,0.0064964695,0.0555965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036451346,0.00039067594,0.00027011478,0.0010437866,0.0027387973,0.0060639507,0.0032607226,0.0048410064,0.015298508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010928278,0.0000030460885,0.000036249294,0.000051088555,0.0000016000024,0.000050583873,0.00031605634,0.000019342564,0.000019022029,0.027157173,0.9628757,0.009459157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008700342,0.0000039556003,0.00031424992,0.00022697194,0.0000017141352,0.000087391054,0.00059224165,0.000040951516,0.00005511601,0.016188022,0.9824668,0.000013786428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0234771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043967962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0555965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041348455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018400353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18598884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1603024263","doi":"10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee207","title":"Adversarial System of Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The International Encyclopedia of Ethics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Term (time); Kingdom; Common law; Geology","score_opus":0.035050499161565996,"score_gpt":0.3343371479428712,"score_spread":0.29928664878130523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1603024263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008532915,0.0007722267,0.0876821,0.018147238,0.0006056764,0.00017257167,0.00037548208,0.00017342149,0.8835384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8415,0.00089408504,0.020651683,0.0052707396,0.0010962872,0.0003588792,0.00023579724,0.00011744991,0.12987512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988182,0.004441904,0.00050539064,0.0019386873,0.0032843864,0.0016476163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911612,0.0027109694,0.00075592805,0.0018762558,0.0027885407,0.0007069994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007431629,0.0006612792,0.0007080754,0.002334856,0.006961669,0.007977471,0.0028362374,0.0044875173,0.033024907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014236042,0.0002687328,0.0009586425,0.0016319047,0.013814632,0.0060480526,0.007741309,0.0063876365,0.0032959073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010331345,0.0000025515224,0.00002693176,0.0000035776588,0.0000021895898,0.000013023609,0.000062828054,0.00016998863,0.00000821913,0.99783957,0.0013922083,0.00047794354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055152814,0.000005015613,0.000068651716,0.000026901069,0.00000435553,0.00004913926,0.000071723116,0.0015409185,0.0000389543,0.97543544,0.022744622,0.000008683328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069760107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055213887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033024907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007854366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006014789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110479295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W16059916","doi":"10.5206/tjr.2013.1.2.3","title":"Ungendering Justice","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transitional justice review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Human rights; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.044826913066594455,"score_gpt":0.3367978217414951,"score_spread":0.2919709086749006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W16059916","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003120007,0.646846,0.0010892532,0.17558655,0.040246576,0.00006008556,0.00012380209,0.000063886735,0.13286388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15994695,0.42942825,0.0017574655,0.26784003,0.02310817,0.00028276895,0.000425226,0.00018699461,0.117024116],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928054,0.0026779666,0.0005116324,0.0006415873,0.0018113886,0.0015520572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577445,0.0015717528,0.00027195667,0.00034605403,0.001310029,0.00072580867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068309936,0.0007253181,0.0012242339,0.0031293645,0.007949576,0.01005656,0.0019844803,0.008370659,0.012340679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017613966,0.00036948465,0.0007399149,0.0026169154,0.00815555,0.0070485976,0.006402835,0.010084359,0.0021137875],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043948923,0.000037175458,0.00026945223,0.0014042514,0.000039424423,0.000115402596,0.002497772,0.00008006789,0.00015022713,0.36676046,0.4444418,0.18416007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010023541,0.000025869858,0.00059369486,0.0033722883,0.00003829597,0.00013320897,0.0025693225,0.00002371899,0.00012652777,0.03975221,0.9533392,0.00001556065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01652886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04656695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01652886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026047051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044340074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606474999","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100010243","title":"Pat Carlen, ed. Imaginary Penalities. Portland, OR: Willan Publishing, 2008, 368 p.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"The Imaginary; Publishing; Content (measure theory); Humanities; Sociology; Political science; Art; Law; Psychology; Mathematics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.012842660530552224,"score_gpt":0.2565655716614447,"score_spread":0.2437229111308925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606474999","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007005368,0.84943455,0.00091282354,0.025487961,0.0033537585,0.000026067273,0.0008211989,0.00017806106,0.119085155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009890964,0.7072359,0.001992882,0.0029704787,0.0018163783,0.00006990482,0.0007248464,0.00024159091,0.27505714],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995096,0.00008816795,0.00004298553,0.000059273778,0.00024498062,0.000055032422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989579,0.00035071143,0.00014726991,0.00004156316,0.00037376213,0.00012868627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086283876,0.0019079789,0.00089885696,0.0040648836,0.002593307,0.004044069,0.0016282845,0.0023918664,0.0690074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030573967,0.0009704539,0.00047054916,0.0041761557,0.0016184818,0.0062583946,0.0010848747,0.0023412001,0.029372292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025992475,0.000013440065,0.00022647841,0.00033751558,0.000006341376,0.00008357929,0.0005334866,0.00010530939,0.000049741786,0.0072635943,0.89222497,0.09912957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004098523,0.0000043531754,0.0011222038,0.0013627612,0.0000072915736,0.0002523987,0.0007048648,0.000055553668,0.00006830116,0.004911338,0.99149674,0.00001008666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0556015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16567944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0690074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002991779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051760655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23085272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607373344","doi":"","title":"Between Principle and Pragmatism: The Decline of Principled Reasoning in the Jurisprudence of the McLachlin Court","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Supreme court; Pragmatism; Economic Justice; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00871523884894968,"score_gpt":0.3023380822662509,"score_spread":0.2936228434173012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607373344","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04326337,0.023083063,0.08547683,0.576209,0.0015518735,0.000050366463,0.00004546201,0.0001484223,0.2701716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9334683,0.0032314097,0.013722291,0.037309166,0.0013178512,0.00010542945,0.000022340251,0.00015565615,0.010667603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95205325,0.028401209,0.001191232,0.004465229,0.011331963,0.0025570602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9369139,0.049904786,0.0028627894,0.0046369624,0.004585507,0.0010960434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04860808,0.00049747847,0.00091320253,0.0026400604,0.013847906,0.020377986,0.0029424825,0.0106409835,0.0014045013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07339542,0.0008022541,0.0009770655,0.002792286,0.11501789,0.01971193,0.009865485,0.028034788,0.00042153493],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004785243,0.0000031095203,0.00006457707,0.0000119575825,0.0000023754956,0.000019086108,0.003183672,0.00012821672,0.000024074374,0.99208707,0.001549306,0.0029218416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012033809,0.000007439695,0.00014127133,0.00009601316,0.0000034960851,0.000034096753,0.0008841061,0.0005589465,0.000078904035,0.9701885,0.027980123,0.000015051059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052079465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037780553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052079465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030209752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02442376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25706714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607575384","doi":"10.4324/9780203708064-9","title":"Copyright, Originality, and the Public Domain in Eighteenth-Century England","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Public domain; Novelty; Copyright Act; Scholarship; Law; Creativity; Political science; Literature; History; Law and economics; Art; Philosophy; Copyright law; Sociology; Intellectual property; Theology","score_opus":0.006487883056488435,"score_gpt":0.24652959525835183,"score_spread":0.2400417122018634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607575384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3717363,0.054096866,0.0013977585,0.03874099,0.00065294595,0.000039522958,0.0000723597,0.00002498522,0.5332383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94274455,0.008670854,0.00030337405,0.001070143,0.00035067444,0.000036932342,0.000015452853,0.000017089307,0.04679096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754566,0.001131347,0.00015375279,0.00020413117,0.0005603026,0.00040478495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960776,0.0024678144,0.00041882007,0.00025810717,0.00043862028,0.00033903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027288315,0.00022249715,0.00034906404,0.0016595671,0.009912013,0.011227439,0.00067467516,0.0026209573,0.0045503257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056238915,0.00030124784,0.00017453851,0.0013860277,0.027528767,0.0100564025,0.004319876,0.0036453025,0.00041851535],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021488038,0.000026075246,0.0004583798,0.000055071523,0.0000017661702,0.0005318777,0.14526188,0.000036255762,0.00012460406,0.8433932,0.0025172487,0.007572126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050735583,0.00006619244,0.005273151,0.0009204902,0.000008212888,0.0007698846,0.06129226,0.00012432158,0.0004324823,0.1257932,0.8052169,0.000052049872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030852282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04469553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030852282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013272725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041470844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09630084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608090500","doi":"10.3280/sd2009-002007","title":"Risk, propriety, and sexual assault","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Femininity; Power (physics); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Criminal law; Sexual assault; Law; Criminology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Gender studies; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020814290504479534,"score_gpt":0.3059747977184915,"score_spread":0.285160507214012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608090500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40268293,0.021444673,0.003233895,0.07174961,0.00025408767,0.000032632644,0.0000758731,0.000019014095,0.50050735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929536,0.0028842355,0.00020458974,0.00058444025,0.00006229782,0.000007393425,0.0000080103555,0.0000021944982,0.0032932218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749124,0.0016354967,0.0001039417,0.00009290548,0.00046410496,0.0002123861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959341,0.0022907134,0.0008791899,0.00013827806,0.0002824986,0.0004753064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002281384,0.00024337435,0.00019873561,0.0018952191,0.003785312,0.005015493,0.0005493064,0.0016296586,0.0042349664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072874627,0.00015010181,0.00022263001,0.0011930907,0.024655135,0.003048723,0.003200417,0.0020689121,0.00020629754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032240147,0.000121048295,0.024434503,0.00008484545,0.0000097472985,0.00042587103,0.030879375,0.00032632897,0.00016267855,0.92843366,0.0010618622,0.014027715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029953231,0.00014641855,0.0639285,0.00090411043,0.00003829283,0.0025327837,0.12715931,0.0013251184,0.00046452705,0.7128675,0.090531126,0.00007233908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017480124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018263068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017480124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057240366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032828068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041531026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1609406408","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1135","title":"Voicing an Opinion: Authorship, Collaboration and the Judgments of Justice Bertha Wilson","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Economic Justice; Law; Portrait; Sociology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.055178544063658186,"score_gpt":0.35053046500315016,"score_spread":0.295351920939492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1609406408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44962102,0.007354206,0.0068465443,0.16421258,0.0017811698,0.000105339415,0.000117253665,0.00009231853,0.36986956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98687613,0.00047530234,0.00077630026,0.0025462997,0.00026714322,0.000020806097,0.000012311486,0.00003845089,0.008987219],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9463806,0.03580005,0.001346884,0.003642272,0.009331586,0.003498517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78329915,0.1658451,0.013399651,0.0054076607,0.018995719,0.013052787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030016132,0.00032133542,0.0004546896,0.0032732096,0.028458528,0.019003635,0.001756963,0.0051726485,0.00585642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17333186,0.00042837096,0.00023203481,0.0028620767,0.028452452,0.0106250765,0.007277173,0.0044715945,0.00083257],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012317928,0.0000889322,0.015031554,0.00010752016,0.00003546166,0.001752757,0.56589925,0.0003509178,0.0006491869,0.29550564,0.061707675,0.058747813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005802291,0.00009604068,0.0180066,0.0005934442,0.000031329113,0.00084156083,0.4280142,0.0013358843,0.0009212733,0.23268268,0.31717807,0.00024092641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071496725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11120017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071496725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01180493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011192223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15874243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1628009351","doi":"","title":"Left in Legal Limbo: Transsexual Identity and the Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Transsexual; Identity (music); Gender identity; Sexual identity; Sexual orientation; Perception; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Political science; Psychology; Law; Transgender; Gender studies; Sociology; Human sexuality; Social group","score_opus":0.010128050285368246,"score_gpt":0.28650617862148414,"score_spread":0.2763781283361159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1628009351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22619474,0.010487822,0.0062438655,0.11444077,0.00045003422,0.000017992666,0.000038018872,0.000028949558,0.6420978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831618,0.0011493984,0.00035896033,0.003918396,0.00008463259,0.0000127393205,0.000010713555,0.000009734451,0.011293578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773264,0.0012245436,0.00005156843,0.00015920472,0.00041448436,0.00041745763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892265,0.000472199,0.00017509596,0.0000790224,0.00014759076,0.00020356882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022458846,0.00014127132,0.0002807782,0.0010821811,0.00848684,0.0077628023,0.0007410506,0.0035957838,0.005231511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004295944,0.00013594545,0.00020149174,0.0010981268,0.03620373,0.006086544,0.0052607446,0.0042249584,0.00046827164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001009588,0.000019115303,0.0012483582,0.000011331429,0.0000013512828,0.0003269306,0.039032646,0.00002613911,0.000095592935,0.9526369,0.0013638813,0.005227666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015415268,0.000034526143,0.0046387664,0.0003991511,0.000010287288,0.0007855311,0.11033878,0.00040593126,0.00039634074,0.75584704,0.12709986,0.000028495087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02577402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03298147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02577402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046955454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004735081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051248014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1640554546","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2008v33n1a1920","title":"Undecided Stories: Alfred Hitchcock’s<i>Blackmail</i>and The Problem of Moral Agency","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Moral agency; Agency (philosophy); Relation (database); Sociology; Epistemology; Moral psychology; Moral disengagement; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.038264255229916146,"score_gpt":0.2705154085890124,"score_spread":0.23225115335909627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1640554546","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42666566,0.027219797,0.0039867084,0.17014329,0.0020846718,0.00003828156,0.000060876777,0.00010775287,0.36969292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9719186,0.002550227,0.0003979719,0.0060613863,0.00044983393,0.000010333942,0.000012139361,0.00003069038,0.018568669],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969813,0.0023024387,0.000029325758,0.00012237467,0.0002747065,0.00028977703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957344,0.0029193012,0.00036757728,0.0001399965,0.0004120125,0.00042669754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027078153,0.0004311397,0.0002634746,0.0009025902,0.013178665,0.008228716,0.00079291227,0.003768927,0.0032973096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056461236,0.00028693338,0.00015529405,0.00056396687,0.015654791,0.005895913,0.0029556353,0.005423241,0.00046046695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000927933,0.00003848977,0.001129324,0.00010454245,0.000016320457,0.0019629125,0.63403016,0.00013295677,0.0007110968,0.27495033,0.06495882,0.021872165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019092093,0.000065319844,0.0031299556,0.00039023327,0.000019110237,0.0016599456,0.3530048,0.0003170327,0.0013447901,0.04801799,0.5919685,0.00006319754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02246295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023071595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02246295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005308528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013652296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044664443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1659026188","doi":"10.3390/soc5030618","title":"On Imaginative Criminology and Its Significance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Societies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Wright; Criminology; Orthodoxy; Bureaucracy; Criminal justice; Cultural criminology; Value (mathematics); Dance; Law; Political science; History; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.08815000224625488,"score_gpt":0.33851746926804643,"score_spread":0.2503674670217916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1659026188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018293979,0.14829755,0.030406483,0.36376217,0.0042686206,0.00005316185,0.000044163517,0.000065546774,0.43480825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8371543,0.08645774,0.011028016,0.029732019,0.00665638,0.00018990546,0.000048078764,0.00017378227,0.028559752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.987475,0.009739871,0.0002169727,0.00066880655,0.0014435033,0.0004557988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9672725,0.027307067,0.001252596,0.0018416403,0.0015278019,0.0007983404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013296385,0.000980863,0.0007740116,0.004405081,0.008524351,0.014342908,0.0018569008,0.004943963,0.003539633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013045374,0.00029995333,0.00053157296,0.003765995,0.13028653,0.014071709,0.007529418,0.009090749,0.00067950215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002208383,0.0000069920984,0.00005556294,0.000042958654,0.0000015738111,0.00003667338,0.0070169284,0.000043702657,0.000023301462,0.9873931,0.0017576467,0.003619481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038370654,0.000012806648,0.0001818572,0.0005438091,0.0000028524742,0.00012270597,0.013287135,0.00019254496,0.00008986784,0.8653064,0.12024747,0.000008705328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034809208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038762784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014342908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007548195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007190063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07031882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1665852471","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1252","title":"A Reflection on Section 2(b)’s Quixotic Journey, 1982-2012","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Section (typography); Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Neutrality; Sociology; Normative; Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.0821332812164434,"score_gpt":0.36817475810448486,"score_spread":0.2860414768880415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1665852471","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010039534,0.025826208,0.0014082354,0.8021295,0.026433308,0.00008079481,0.00016900073,0.00005128333,0.13386217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10792599,0.015935866,0.0015248263,0.46475077,0.007939956,0.00022593669,0.00013938338,0.0002010899,0.40135616],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942115,0.0020734337,0.00021102041,0.00065877975,0.0018011987,0.00104408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964567,0.0017690344,0.00015455602,0.00010733375,0.0010506943,0.00046166312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078369165,0.00039461118,0.00049181207,0.0008586863,0.011115675,0.012446172,0.0012382717,0.014661568,0.009899334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015063287,0.0005106839,0.0006215806,0.0010853434,0.0057952744,0.0062701018,0.0034171587,0.019136716,0.0024433716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003639563,0.00010268204,0.00037863685,0.0001404993,0.0000043831583,0.00069243624,0.02590376,0.00014449615,0.00057664455,0.18026891,0.765697,0.026054177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004187666,0.0000171722,0.00053747307,0.0001246578,0.0000016807865,0.00006580712,0.0032232564,0.000021611993,0.00011238603,0.0044477032,0.99142796,0.000016090273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083269045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112992175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083269045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0146844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018648485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16556877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1668420634","doi":"10.21226/t2kw2b","title":"Maria Popova. Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies: A Study of Courts in Russia and Ukraine.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"East/West Journal of Ukrainian Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Span (engineering); Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Economic history; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.041190319095889584,"score_gpt":0.3622731381066242,"score_spread":0.3210828190107346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1668420634","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3833737,0.40041012,0.0015434525,0.09730501,0.0014095092,0.000082562685,0.0014943734,0.00005472335,0.1143266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92228174,0.064205885,0.0003698285,0.002114458,0.000318782,0.0000662372,0.00035621322,0.00003055138,0.010256338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934417,0.00032807875,0.00003738238,0.000072950446,0.00009619216,0.0001212354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990972,0.00040948464,0.00023234199,0.000024405595,0.00009490181,0.00014160205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009162265,0.00044451572,0.00047763367,0.0020255963,0.0035154216,0.002661095,0.0010097567,0.0012465299,0.003846669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020244198,0.00038192107,0.00037015098,0.0029090273,0.002376433,0.0032821095,0.0024491677,0.0018120169,0.00069112645],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015262069,0.00035444688,0.07992086,0.0023407864,0.00015593847,0.0022105793,0.23653273,0.001049939,0.000848046,0.36059132,0.18587483,0.12996796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000266339,0.00014301493,0.3733349,0.0027496705,0.00008045687,0.00089538546,0.20265874,0.00047054817,0.00082814036,0.043126557,0.3756323,0.000053626914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017372034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03023061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017372034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002858844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002530133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034541845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1673270094","doi":"10.21083/csieci.v6i1.1086","title":"(Pre)caution Improvisation Area","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Realm; Interpretation (philosophy); Dimension (graph theory); Comprehension; Certainty; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Visual arts; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05792702093049689,"score_gpt":0.41852709784896236,"score_spread":0.36060007691846546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1673270094","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006351289,0.006594654,0.014535424,0.5217973,0.012982963,0.00012963841,0.00007754378,0.00035221595,0.437179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3967008,0.0029859475,0.008880355,0.21772604,0.010571701,0.0005347483,0.000102267004,0.00055770564,0.3619404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98772454,0.0055347644,0.0006970713,0.0020039931,0.0032091527,0.00083049614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9723846,0.015203589,0.0012632569,0.0031313892,0.00655445,0.0014627186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008694243,0.0005778389,0.0004769356,0.0007966339,0.0075439382,0.010897834,0.0031011929,0.013366645,0.031353425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035420705,0.00029642644,0.00059280935,0.0005914915,0.026209977,0.011545823,0.0060713296,0.01868533,0.008735568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003445149,0.000032821117,0.00029104244,0.0003068864,0.000005498975,0.0003461309,0.030710166,0.00007854695,0.000816582,0.76000774,0.18303713,0.02433301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006966264,0.000019459272,0.0002766368,0.00046469757,0.000003667758,0.00027827494,0.011834424,0.00014386643,0.0007647509,0.107955195,0.87823707,0.0000150745645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047187656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005538444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031353425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051502134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005683651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104887605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1678114762","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1835982","title":"One Right Answer?: The Meta Edition","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.02875009455982161,"score_gpt":0.26069539197603975,"score_spread":0.23194529741621814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1678114762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002486173,0.15385062,0.0032105623,0.61096317,0.20561291,0.000048625934,0.003132658,0.00028726386,0.022645561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011535829,0.13466395,0.004380163,0.45880654,0.33852798,0.00048005828,0.0027187325,0.0010300484,0.04785663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899928,0.004372368,0.001397101,0.0009775471,0.0029533575,0.00030688566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9197313,0.04572087,0.0047817677,0.0058837594,0.02168325,0.0021989953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015868645,0.0015720632,0.0030585304,0.011956259,0.0021521018,0.011241969,0.004057362,0.0112471,0.06173082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10700064,0.0010267553,0.0017221196,0.010952157,0.0036123728,0.017772406,0.0049306103,0.009916511,0.031100906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041687275,0.000010333558,0.00009356078,0.0014403049,0.00008852887,0.00002437497,0.00008162236,0.000056332727,0.00005222083,0.0117580835,0.96896356,0.017389456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000076517186,0.00002360151,0.000515585,0.013216763,0.0002977145,0.000106770276,0.00032653028,0.00031849553,0.00016600978,0.050361473,0.934534,0.00005658545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046610655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059597692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06173082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004687957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007005215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20651013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1685140930","doi":"","title":"Fission to Fusion: From Improvisation and Formalism in Law and Music","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Legitimacy; Musical; Genius; Formalism (music); Politics; Legal history; Classical music; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Music history; Literature; Aesthetics; Sociology; Political science; Art; Visual arts; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03472048775403873,"score_gpt":0.26026100076979936,"score_spread":0.2255405130157606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1685140930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29858387,0.008616116,0.061500955,0.030240273,0.0004736126,0.000077096454,0.000052120122,0.0002198564,0.6002361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99337935,0.0005659165,0.0017402022,0.00038169938,0.00008641812,0.00002137622,0.000012079696,0.000042702137,0.0037702103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99056375,0.0052447207,0.00032302018,0.0010251335,0.0018316472,0.0010117053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99198794,0.0049148956,0.0007926587,0.0011250952,0.0005013387,0.00067805185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010292537,0.00062985736,0.00089511485,0.0033912351,0.01232989,0.016574724,0.0018362061,0.0037321635,0.005124283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018071104,0.00061909034,0.00086074363,0.0023780162,0.11995178,0.030668885,0.021136116,0.007368406,0.00060492614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025077157,0.000008842084,0.00031212164,0.000014087791,0.000002662375,0.000064286774,0.044582784,0.00011912069,0.0000904826,0.9502839,0.00019934315,0.004297397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023100212,0.00004382024,0.00045198895,0.000112081325,0.000006949495,0.00015159325,0.028663965,0.00047300756,0.00028384483,0.9477865,0.021983286,0.000019793211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058655776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037112935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016574724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008081482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005858511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058635533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1694103430","doi":"","title":"Revering irreverence: A fair dealing exception for both weapon and target parodies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Law; Comics; Supreme court; Value (mathematics); Government (linguistics); Crew; Sociology; Political science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.052833066548143404,"score_gpt":0.2454073311545032,"score_spread":0.1925742646063598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1694103430","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1039495,0.0015197354,0.061828468,0.055744153,0.0015579305,0.00025304247,0.00006079231,0.0003793173,0.7747071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91661924,0.00022947548,0.0056868545,0.028340414,0.00046750664,0.00027372758,0.000029789211,0.00012202109,0.048231017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94186926,0.02650095,0.0030030396,0.006375005,0.01570372,0.00654796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96982354,0.01888074,0.0018657385,0.0046313796,0.0035602115,0.0012384213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029804928,0.0005060015,0.00077858334,0.0011514302,0.011578449,0.010146956,0.003242089,0.01481065,0.005651494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07372352,0.0005843251,0.0010807759,0.000740167,0.019016853,0.008468687,0.01116211,0.015469957,0.001367202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003511659,0.000042680087,0.0010163407,0.00003259716,0.000010420278,0.0008520159,0.015810028,0.00017969676,0.0006626862,0.95946926,0.008565649,0.013323507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007165192,0.00024836612,0.0045739436,0.00066890166,0.00006959521,0.0018915188,0.019226274,0.0023879989,0.0025912698,0.6039939,0.36407056,0.00020604004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012286433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017335897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029804928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053213085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010153414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15762544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1699482161","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2006v31n2a1715","title":"In the Public Interest: The Future of Canadian Copyright Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Copyright law; Public interest; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.02757243890095911,"score_gpt":0.26809386534895113,"score_spread":0.24052142644799201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1699482161","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003993044,0.042890348,0.0029834434,0.5004321,0.004660244,0.00003670475,0.00024683482,0.00017196698,0.44458526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5653615,0.09230574,0.008978774,0.121617615,0.0078609185,0.0001290204,0.0005022646,0.0003571855,0.20288706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798884,0.002681782,0.00046463922,0.0015285091,0.011375425,0.0040612044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9596309,0.010501747,0.0010748046,0.0022438355,0.020276265,0.0062725036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01551274,0.0006717649,0.001001576,0.0056930934,0.029157422,0.035009768,0.0040628263,0.016903698,0.025858525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059310745,0.0005344977,0.000654633,0.008248224,0.03701022,0.019028502,0.006522379,0.011440742,0.0022826358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001458647,0.000011472626,0.00025696043,0.00009853621,0.000005889286,0.00011293839,0.0024888555,0.0001627804,0.000055487602,0.86244684,0.09708839,0.037257306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018123612,0.0000112197295,0.0010108423,0.0006266065,0.000013720401,0.00008307226,0.0033465368,0.0004885425,0.000099223755,0.24088542,0.7533466,0.00007012043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9372113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93346673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11650666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11650666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26379713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8453189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1700671006","doi":"10.21991/c9vw8q","title":"A REMEDY FOR THE NINETIES: SCHACHTER V. R. AND HAIG &amp; BIRCH V. CANADA","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.04796089876755093,"score_gpt":0.2701920002024005,"score_spread":0.22223110143484953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1700671006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013605216,0.011986473,0.0029566411,0.46570638,0.00670093,0.00028225072,0.0010187157,0.00030833625,0.49743503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30984336,0.0045668725,0.004654879,0.38760862,0.0012778073,0.0003757026,0.0004864557,0.000248011,0.29093832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852293,0.0014356034,0.00045442715,0.0014735324,0.006033643,0.005373498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930641,0.0009848933,0.00034614856,0.0004281604,0.0034661815,0.0017105123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006829034,0.0009750359,0.00097227714,0.0018272646,0.031562403,0.010472524,0.0043005967,0.029196918,0.012138852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018118978,0.0009728984,0.0011926169,0.0020274809,0.012889877,0.0038676031,0.0046418523,0.025973707,0.0018159957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053540476,0.000034127628,0.0009237935,0.000052919895,0.000026754655,0.0002873645,0.0012667018,0.00017032695,0.0003794518,0.6325745,0.35643107,0.007799519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018554782,0.000032990665,0.0037133603,0.00040425037,0.000083844905,0.0002422205,0.001998946,0.00040836152,0.0007486868,0.07483497,0.91714376,0.00020304299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94431174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97503555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059250847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059250847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22276358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.429897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1700843914","doi":"","title":"Feminist Aesthetics and Copyright Law: Genius, Value, and Gendered Visions of the Creative Self","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Genius; Vision; Subject (documents); Copyright law; Aesthetics; Quality (philosophy); Epistemology; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Intellectual property; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.006341807494525441,"score_gpt":0.25687593204060777,"score_spread":0.2505341245460823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1700843914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074997135,0.008579554,0.011758738,0.03931252,0.0004129402,0.000028858143,0.00005999607,0.000057591173,0.86479264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93594676,0.0024249118,0.0016469628,0.0014324229,0.00026096313,0.000052508152,0.000018093937,0.0000931131,0.058124367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620074,0.002334609,0.00006390134,0.00028883308,0.00079140684,0.00032048632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955967,0.0032556572,0.00031326892,0.00037782686,0.00026330425,0.00019312826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043077446,0.0005507379,0.00032166246,0.0019430565,0.006436888,0.011005819,0.0009308472,0.002381358,0.006729141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006446349,0.00024422817,0.00036334508,0.0013351109,0.06555034,0.009775038,0.0040669558,0.003159785,0.00074169814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007101301,0.0000057158377,0.00013610281,0.000021483722,0.0000011072839,0.000090057794,0.05596356,0.00006021433,0.00012611941,0.9384995,0.0012644652,0.0038244787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017150938,0.0000233152,0.00082405924,0.0004017008,0.0000056912895,0.000554763,0.078012064,0.00049910886,0.0008706075,0.61150974,0.3072609,0.000020939471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037137573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033803324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011005819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063746693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00224732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046251714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1712723925","doi":"","title":"Sex on the Internet and Fitness for Judicial Office: Correspondent's Report from Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Appearance of impropriety; Law; Queen (butterfly); Political science; The Internet; High Court","score_opus":0.008262237854048962,"score_gpt":0.26031289035376026,"score_spread":0.2520506524997113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1712723925","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48923343,0.026845565,0.0005235388,0.13204896,0.0028353594,0.0007560139,0.023066321,0.00021436905,0.32447645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70054823,0.03371766,0.00061536714,0.030239612,0.00038280684,0.000120173034,0.0048648342,0.00014949017,0.22936179],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961882,0.00018221702,0.00010749154,0.00019297212,0.0023120188,0.0010170415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99178106,0.0006669302,0.00042206174,0.00011772097,0.0039006923,0.0031114353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011904994,0.00031755178,0.0003079679,0.0032145202,0.011821701,0.004113436,0.0014108011,0.0019264512,0.011771989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004071659,0.00041559874,0.0002943071,0.0051117963,0.0015063924,0.0006920442,0.0015578008,0.0025797456,0.0010796157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010790273,0.00033306947,0.24160558,0.0006744879,0.00007680839,0.0040638675,0.02907934,0.00024291199,0.00081448717,0.006634025,0.60715795,0.109209575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026209622,0.000060551694,0.42429498,0.00037437363,0.000055653712,0.00065381866,0.06789551,0.00018711363,0.0004607189,0.00024675528,0.5056583,0.00008608396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.996534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99888116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04965165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04965165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15809715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36024964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W171892814","doi":"10.32920/22057208","title":"Tied Hands? A Doctrinal and Policy Argument for the Validity of Advance Consent","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Autonomy; Political science; Supreme court; Argument (complex analysis); Informed consent; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.07940971450777147,"score_gpt":0.3887835497025248,"score_spread":0.30937383519475337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W171892814","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022849696,0.0024638663,0.03425831,0.69418424,0.0013114429,0.00012134747,0.000091348906,0.000046652363,0.24467304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85334516,0.0011886504,0.010382485,0.117500015,0.0018202376,0.000450532,0.00005115933,0.00005737048,0.015204521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93348616,0.038029153,0.0025453053,0.0074186353,0.014020116,0.0045006364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8856927,0.08862139,0.0053282557,0.009446216,0.008410677,0.002500766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05596556,0.0005924648,0.0010551915,0.0019427653,0.012184659,0.012362422,0.0046077957,0.036697835,0.00530357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12791447,0.000904205,0.0011639573,0.0015192595,0.08789186,0.019829096,0.008286079,0.031967398,0.0012234709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076250435,0.000009845619,0.00009010717,0.000009705956,0.0000021545568,0.000030363106,0.0008921546,0.000066418426,0.000022721426,0.9966036,0.0013052941,0.00095998065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045117617,0.000018953635,0.00017411362,0.00016340276,0.00000926425,0.000060913866,0.0008594264,0.0004774238,0.00021822916,0.97532827,0.022621423,0.000023585524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013101361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054592206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05596556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009446305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021326115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2959777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1729036349","doi":"","title":"Artistic Expression, Aesthetic Value and the Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Virtue; Aesthetic value; Narrative; Aesthetics; Expression (computer science); Value theory; Law; Work (physics); Epistemology; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.01588779336155699,"score_gpt":0.22516430024978265,"score_spread":0.20927650688822566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1729036349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048807114,0.0034265153,0.010991033,0.015267107,0.00022532495,0.00003359159,0.000029070572,0.000031150863,0.9211891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806785,0.00081519526,0.001982256,0.0010336776,0.00013119022,0.000025640336,0.000011289997,0.000023292241,0.015298876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99351585,0.0029792269,0.00017636763,0.00047364633,0.0021458548,0.00070907845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99366874,0.0032013166,0.0007642739,0.0007899677,0.001155442,0.00042036534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055813254,0.00038948463,0.00038967628,0.0023653496,0.008148611,0.013837928,0.0013464028,0.0025176192,0.0053160745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011730862,0.0002743053,0.00037720817,0.001691899,0.07317604,0.006589513,0.004324228,0.004020064,0.0004665042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003945749,0.000007458219,0.0002986614,0.000013652039,0.000001613079,0.000033819553,0.0032251466,0.00010202021,0.00006924454,0.99159217,0.0007559456,0.0038963992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000938421,0.000020387552,0.0018572285,0.0002270154,0.000009251893,0.0001522607,0.008299199,0.00053255673,0.00037815535,0.93098027,0.057512965,0.000021294081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017045014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021633653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017045014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011371596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053787585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082507074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1748598236","doi":"10.24908/ss.v13i2.5682","title":"Thinking about Law and Surveillance","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02247144381270936,"score_gpt":0.2877078528558572,"score_spread":0.2652364090431478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1748598236","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061824294,0.017798087,0.022308368,0.5311469,0.0026333095,0.000030000378,0.00015404665,0.00006774592,0.41967914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7974151,0.011866477,0.011096648,0.105201006,0.0035761849,0.00014607978,0.00016905375,0.00008904184,0.07044049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99449426,0.0033840653,0.00013773986,0.00070614176,0.00086759723,0.00041013688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99186337,0.0055275066,0.00049271435,0.0005710348,0.0010919046,0.00045347534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005581209,0.0004496248,0.0003442795,0.0017184886,0.0054579647,0.010460489,0.0011689556,0.008889448,0.009770478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013124848,0.0003126829,0.00042800096,0.001208609,0.032638136,0.018182656,0.0021853724,0.0077874227,0.0014177555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004110212,0.0000028177856,0.00014890109,0.000016457903,0.0000022634333,0.00002017859,0.0015303288,0.00007390171,0.000019130925,0.9817166,0.013494187,0.0029712648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061466762,0.000009415995,0.00029400614,0.00014840442,0.000004343749,0.00007226344,0.0026108644,0.0002766635,0.00009885894,0.8791004,0.11736901,0.000009486019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011854276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009547347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011854276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005658398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004581308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041054785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1755662691","doi":"10.18733/c3pp4p","title":"Academic and Artistic Freedom and the Israel-Palestine Conflict: Towards a Canadian Pedagogy of the Suppressed","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cultural and Pedagogical Inquiry","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Palestine; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Academic freedom; Administration (probate law); Political science; Law; Sociology; History; Higher education; Ancient history; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5172642146018476,"score_gpt":0.44654966638228916,"score_spread":0.07071454821955842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1755662691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062062103,0.009153393,0.007901392,0.16913068,0.0017639445,0.00013277931,0.000037649515,0.00008617576,0.74973196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8881038,0.0044656657,0.005153904,0.017100433,0.00017347213,0.00007403468,0.000026355041,0.00007737184,0.08482507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99417275,0.0023344515,0.00013335356,0.0004523243,0.0015407365,0.0013664693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962842,0.001359578,0.00016849909,0.00016625355,0.000863161,0.001158269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007492131,0.00055845705,0.0004282299,0.0025161433,0.040577188,0.018432202,0.002590394,0.0049300953,0.006439286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007379452,0.00046588073,0.0004115716,0.002202521,0.056698125,0.005937117,0.0103785,0.0143518485,0.00059204426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013813328,0.000055396507,0.0007192652,0.00005456534,0.0000032571286,0.0002551454,0.16888644,0.00014414657,0.00026577647,0.8004854,0.010905693,0.018211005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027275564,0.000031412674,0.0014180252,0.0004029015,0.000007941269,0.00021131881,0.17431593,0.00042722066,0.0004528153,0.09568034,0.7269838,0.000041060088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8259998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8850913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1740002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09121085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14290468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6617842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1769017832","doi":"10.7202/1121170ar","title":"Templates for Activism: Creative Convergences in Feminist Art and Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Social activism; The arts; Sociology; Jurisprudence; Creative work; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06706585764131892,"score_gpt":0.39573926760293004,"score_spread":0.3286734099616111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1769017832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07807865,0.0028341836,0.23711206,0.05191231,0.0018714132,0.00041678018,0.00010072268,0.0008686602,0.62680525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84429,0.0010906943,0.08461321,0.002194103,0.00044266199,0.0007492398,0.0001063019,0.00092824735,0.0655856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98763406,0.009403608,0.0002920143,0.0007832623,0.0012651916,0.00062188297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838096,0.01214988,0.0006138521,0.0019876142,0.00043162628,0.0010074683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015660502,0.0006947291,0.00047603418,0.0027267195,0.009281079,0.015492953,0.0018797403,0.0034831495,0.010797283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021202251,0.00077920896,0.0009417129,0.0013456278,0.043721765,0.016356414,0.015457326,0.005220814,0.0016207751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015808526,0.000028179165,0.00019581476,0.000034123987,0.0000026422074,0.00016842129,0.064659655,0.00025240533,0.00033224883,0.9129024,0.0035422053,0.01786607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003198846,0.000025248692,0.00019280623,0.00025386148,0.0000058714004,0.00018846727,0.038056027,0.0017930473,0.0010409551,0.721526,0.2368672,0.000018533428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000771892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017052094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015660502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041146553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003577539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08282167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W177433872","doi":"","title":"Review Essay – Emmanuel Melissaris’s Ubiquitous Law: Legal Theory and the Space for Legal Pluralism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Legal realism; Pluralism (philosophy); Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Law; Normative; Philosophy of law; Political science; Legal profession; Epistemology; Law and economics; Comparative law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011009376186398207,"score_gpt":0.28498303071026476,"score_spread":0.27397365452386657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W177433872","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064923515,0.76275915,0.00068434596,0.16144608,0.039340533,0.000013529577,0.00005721781,0.0000228817,0.035026938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02378442,0.75390023,0.00047658154,0.06103597,0.106117316,0.000057324825,0.00014770306,0.00006977458,0.054410663],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998678,0.00036896678,0.000053869386,0.00026282415,0.0005246932,0.000111656474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714065,0.0015319114,0.00022371585,0.0001100293,0.00078034995,0.00021335982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013745374,0.0005831156,0.0008521443,0.0022109055,0.0016455388,0.0061037033,0.0014297726,0.0055520413,0.009914826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049799206,0.0003098938,0.00044692503,0.0031260727,0.005758507,0.0064788456,0.0017558335,0.0056246007,0.0046634357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017137269,0.000032010103,0.00014963944,0.0012931024,0.000018667482,0.000102614766,0.00045398035,0.00017237871,0.00023540379,0.11024804,0.8182709,0.06900619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003418485,0.0000068258723,0.00026078167,0.0008993432,0.000004961151,0.00011728932,0.00030478172,0.000040364102,0.00004292841,0.013955942,0.98435587,0.000007535518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004564699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063986983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009914826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046002045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00365045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03337705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W178636300","doi":"10.1057/9780230234734_3","title":"Levinasian Ethics and the Concept of Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Philosophy; Philosophy of law; Law; Moral obligation; Argument (complex analysis); Character (mathematics); Epistemology; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Comparative law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.036170741574393594,"score_gpt":0.29265436440634623,"score_spread":0.25648362283195264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W178636300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010403081,0.029339705,0.010090366,0.03658988,0.000504886,0.000025523133,0.00005569541,0.0000689498,0.91292197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8006316,0.012659238,0.008790114,0.0068412083,0.0008456789,0.00015804877,0.00007860905,0.00015450585,0.16984102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997883,0.0012586152,0.00005972421,0.00021162361,0.00036142662,0.00022567018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893016,0.0005169926,0.000114666356,0.00011878391,0.00019456596,0.00012483922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019007472,0.0005885527,0.00037449365,0.0012690333,0.0030364534,0.004770506,0.0007856873,0.003145423,0.0063633295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024645622,0.00026437317,0.0002763628,0.0011371137,0.028601326,0.0054740384,0.0029187626,0.003899169,0.0012658987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010829496,0.0000017797087,0.000022226204,0.000008944991,3.8990086e-7,0.000008530586,0.0006142204,0.000035667945,0.000012508071,0.99691737,0.001263834,0.0011134177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003120467,0.000004005445,0.00007076378,0.00004798251,8.054762e-7,0.0000311064,0.00035526452,0.00012670785,0.000018506369,0.9262811,0.073058344,0.0000022996398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006248195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054909666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011048324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011048324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08016163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W178691787","doi":"","title":"Reconciling Dispossession: The Recognition of Native Title in Canada and Australia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of Canadian studies = Revue internationale d'études canadiennes","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.07312362800646681,"score_gpt":0.3183575624785293,"score_spread":0.2452339344720625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W178691787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89637023,0.0013439563,0.00029886013,0.027567724,0.00013294294,0.000031224343,0.00006600764,0.0000079597285,0.07418114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883052,0.00031611556,0.000112210924,0.0017917025,0.000017623137,0.000010928907,0.000017290815,0.000011700588,0.009417145],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932509,0.0013671936,0.00013212352,0.00045400343,0.0014715071,0.0033242092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987716,0.0027474426,0.000990218,0.00040256456,0.0047465307,0.003397186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051377364,0.00015552405,0.00071836484,0.0015824082,0.037367363,0.009661494,0.0028811907,0.003989867,0.0044427956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01992904,0.0003042589,0.00027378325,0.0033965318,0.017768618,0.003900449,0.007811349,0.0066784555,0.00016829195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015496915,0.00009992096,0.043140702,0.00007758043,0.000041061758,0.0013897951,0.72133094,0.00036040583,0.00044919533,0.18779618,0.01410252,0.031056728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024005716,0.000029867622,0.08466495,0.00021807369,0.000048422913,0.00023907419,0.8121434,0.00047148095,0.000411104,0.015268869,0.086389095,0.00009163991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9908749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99652475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08813547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08813547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15889171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6394706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1796699619","doi":"10.21991/c9n666","title":"Pedagogies of Mapping","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Downtown; Task (project management); Class (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Process (computing); Work (physics); Sociology; Visual arts; Mathematics education; Psychology; Aesthetics; Computer science; Management; History; Engineering; Art; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.04839671608608985,"score_gpt":0.3153386166776551,"score_spread":0.26694190059156525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1796699619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030051697,0.0026904508,0.2465933,0.027842436,0.0014345307,0.00040487616,0.00012499181,0.0014503493,0.68940735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63017505,0.0063689887,0.2038492,0.007228909,0.0007098168,0.0014107956,0.00031024715,0.0010051471,0.14894186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948426,0.0033410762,0.0001339524,0.00061119173,0.00072638365,0.0003448649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942215,0.0036819922,0.00029832745,0.0008943684,0.00044355314,0.00046032516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004279533,0.0012005583,0.00039150062,0.0021084242,0.005129464,0.007706954,0.0024270467,0.0027092798,0.023741465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01469761,0.0004405147,0.00073710183,0.0013813147,0.01141313,0.009284965,0.009900845,0.005167248,0.0047940747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002382382,0.00025934252,0.0013458881,0.0004897874,0.000010473913,0.00040023518,0.09966524,0.0012962847,0.0020044756,0.698274,0.037060812,0.15916955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017507966,0.000065556545,0.00070852076,0.000544229,0.0000057650027,0.00055648666,0.032366954,0.0013464235,0.0012245456,0.27933016,0.68381345,0.000020392818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020177346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002424016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023741465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003015606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039100256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07942307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1812358566","doi":"10.29173/cons24109","title":"The Fuhrer's Face: Inglourious Basterds and Quentin Tarantino’s Confrontation with Nazis, Hitler and Fascist Aesthetics in Hollywood Cinema","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constellations","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nazism; Hollywood; Movie theater; Art; Face (sociological concept); Nazi Germany; Politics; Art history; Argument (complex analysis); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02202742994254017,"score_gpt":0.27698803237681374,"score_spread":0.2549606024342736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1812358566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33032107,0.007339869,0.0023779066,0.048357155,0.0011831496,0.00001728913,0.00003385461,0.00006946077,0.61030024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744995,0.00053758384,0.00017829132,0.0010048831,0.00007618182,0.0000043187897,0.0000036847503,0.000022398717,0.023673065],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932766,0.00042072416,0.000004346543,0.000052368578,0.00007277622,0.00012221443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999605,0.00022466754,0.00004365484,0.000025391211,0.000036045054,0.00006533586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007888385,0.00030192095,0.0001533897,0.00048290196,0.008954197,0.005202108,0.00043468396,0.0012629691,0.0035746424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012651097,0.00012229955,0.000096082804,0.00034231483,0.013779636,0.0024448028,0.0017344021,0.0026399563,0.00024121991],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000705051,0.000022908762,0.0007799266,0.000045043285,0.000005374731,0.0007823193,0.4978175,0.00010621178,0.0009027467,0.45440084,0.03132367,0.013742952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012090431,0.000031441043,0.0025655804,0.00018220811,0.000010732837,0.0005094397,0.358863,0.00025740478,0.000711518,0.025948478,0.6108874,0.00002075282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02718047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07471373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02718047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045216614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076472404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054044485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1829226215","doi":"","title":"Genealogy and the Law in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Law; History; Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.052754725622029236,"score_gpt":0.28476798195298164,"score_spread":0.2320132563309524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1829226215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012501927,0.018473968,0.0011462931,0.029960819,0.00057713105,0.000044657092,0.00038392603,0.00008980654,0.9368215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43993223,0.021119656,0.0017885853,0.0082231825,0.00019006057,0.000071390125,0.00034640654,0.000110203895,0.5282183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978655,0.00014951258,0.000035561192,0.00018099032,0.0010227012,0.0007458503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869305,0.00018315158,0.000043043787,0.000059401897,0.0007790155,0.00024234135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008679925,0.00038523786,0.00044693376,0.0019623628,0.02336416,0.009193794,0.0020368176,0.0024649783,0.011576583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036768212,0.00037901333,0.0002896694,0.0043171714,0.017716788,0.002759081,0.0027896173,0.0034562028,0.00093282043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005246635,0.000004954035,0.0005228683,0.000036316233,0.000003930485,0.00014515637,0.0056999363,0.0002572525,0.000038912578,0.91754925,0.059769295,0.015966881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000085104775,0.0000048995134,0.0025893624,0.00023488383,0.000014412808,0.000109458764,0.0067397533,0.0005412851,0.00008814345,0.07124739,0.91839147,0.000030503335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99552983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99693406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14387482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14387482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20196562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1831000110","doi":"","title":"Re-Imagining Feminist Theory: Transgender Identity, Feminism, and the Law.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Political science; Feminism; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.012669199739416392,"score_gpt":0.2968183117443397,"score_spread":0.2841491120049233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1831000110","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02526068,0.26914394,0.009299093,0.395803,0.00416655,0.000058569003,0.00007192125,0.00004572482,0.29615054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80665565,0.089216724,0.0035415804,0.025296193,0.0022444793,0.00021816223,0.000040260547,0.00007731127,0.072709724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947472,0.0043510757,0.00005711371,0.0002105974,0.0003555843,0.0002783549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948225,0.0040315846,0.00028266324,0.00019905849,0.00030304753,0.00036121922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067564584,0.0007362945,0.0005206984,0.0027483697,0.0086686155,0.009014037,0.0019393067,0.0053497707,0.004883487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004665532,0.00035888236,0.00040774877,0.0021566902,0.05674482,0.012420784,0.0056086294,0.0062533193,0.00048937293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000836993,0.00001981728,0.00031398612,0.000094659525,0.0000027133794,0.0001589213,0.055065624,0.000064562715,0.00005593302,0.9251862,0.008039674,0.010989377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013534556,0.000035949513,0.0012790781,0.0014020816,0.0000097754055,0.0002891254,0.17872961,0.00038010493,0.00023204258,0.5404976,0.27710754,0.000023568266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019084899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042930644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019084899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010943834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007329672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0794034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1831281409","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511619311.005","title":"Appeals to Fear and Pity","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Pity; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology","score_opus":0.034954568939872956,"score_gpt":0.24963245802792958,"score_spread":0.21467788908805663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1831281409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06378074,0.005313419,0.059078317,0.04533459,0.001953462,0.00021257749,0.00014412493,0.0002214123,0.8239614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9556599,0.0014211592,0.0061632344,0.009772707,0.0015363817,0.00017523745,0.00007468403,0.00009815981,0.02509851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828115,0.0058756936,0.0008779012,0.0017953697,0.0069704456,0.0016690545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97187155,0.017509809,0.00425911,0.0019804377,0.0031506703,0.0012283871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010100422,0.0008713781,0.000914632,0.00274583,0.004240077,0.009102311,0.0014656215,0.009923527,0.011083653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04248505,0.0005160391,0.0016292506,0.0013566349,0.021064334,0.012852902,0.0070109894,0.009137402,0.0016425303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079114645,0.00003535649,0.001116934,0.00014240622,0.000035189674,0.0004891735,0.007451971,0.00013677022,0.00070445193,0.97320867,0.0052295676,0.011370394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004360923,0.00005438982,0.0028063282,0.00025636388,0.00007979993,0.0011131193,0.0037249608,0.0008604005,0.000590492,0.9078153,0.08256918,0.00008596021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017634546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013996628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011083653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003675616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018040584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05341679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1832167158","doi":"","title":"From Rawls to Habermas: Toward a Theory of Grounded Impartiality in Canadian Administrative Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Jurisprudence; Law; Political philosophy; Political science; Liberalism; Politics; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Law and economics; Public law","score_opus":0.0313887163453955,"score_gpt":0.30965035424164616,"score_spread":0.2782616378962507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1832167158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03386229,0.007365249,0.06292367,0.07587939,0.00065770105,0.00021756098,0.00024389483,0.00014053438,0.8187097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9397074,0.0030539224,0.02905799,0.0046526003,0.00014533164,0.00014893508,0.0001229796,0.000112271904,0.022998482],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896515,0.003944938,0.00025688508,0.0009460802,0.003499509,0.0017010712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99247956,0.003000972,0.00040192195,0.0006415639,0.0028787113,0.00059731764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010172207,0.0008543758,0.0009402632,0.0070212903,0.020065365,0.019201439,0.0044806805,0.00444834,0.0046974425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015204549,0.000724339,0.0011054424,0.007031188,0.078584656,0.0104782395,0.0070896116,0.0090842685,0.0004976423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025023833,0.0000034261961,0.00007669531,0.000011503533,0.0000016666319,0.000027775106,0.0057537807,0.00017398773,0.00001239925,0.9908987,0.00093907333,0.0020984465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011157328,0.0000075640555,0.00060908694,0.00014987266,0.000017764,0.000037913916,0.0076910015,0.001954329,0.00007218295,0.926883,0.06252326,0.000042906206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91135025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88939095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14593096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14593096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10228373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99059904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1840154969","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1093","title":"And No More Shall We Shout: Noise By-Laws, Freedom of Expression and a Montréal Sex Club","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Expression (computer science); Commonwealth; Relevance (law); Political science; Sophistication; Club; Sociology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01312114948917866,"score_gpt":0.26960562560812273,"score_spread":0.2564844761189441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1840154969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03647112,0.010444949,0.0011329281,0.25614142,0.0039807903,0.000100322104,0.00017895711,0.0001222209,0.6914273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42523155,0.004531426,0.0007512888,0.023237936,0.0006322704,0.000098063516,0.000101037724,0.00015807514,0.54525846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967713,0.0011684857,0.000036269335,0.00025541952,0.00078123604,0.0009872986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704915,0.00025619075,0.00010330263,0.00011762592,0.0003264151,0.0021474238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030823203,0.0005457035,0.00034223768,0.0008113903,0.027040772,0.0150446,0.0021312463,0.003595097,0.058261815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044498537,0.00040282778,0.00032656308,0.0006472607,0.019691717,0.006984637,0.009420454,0.0049612774,0.0032179875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057245077,0.0001388996,0.0045034797,0.000056170953,0.000009291806,0.0005104503,0.054240927,0.000081859296,0.00022812218,0.44173267,0.43352064,0.06492012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016138327,0.000032011994,0.004767063,0.00017235371,0.0000038690227,0.00013157299,0.052824706,0.000100598445,0.000081236445,0.010483544,0.93135226,0.00003462015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56497777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7918886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43502223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021539485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019808412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8751683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1842047640","doi":"10.1111/lsi.12105","title":"Law's Social Forms: A Powerless Approach to the Sociology of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology of law; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Criminology","score_opus":0.06183892157896418,"score_gpt":0.3437962535043929,"score_spread":0.2819573319254287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1842047640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033123862,0.023556272,0.18649967,0.15606898,0.0017467462,0.00012397258,0.00013164897,0.00015392556,0.59859484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9467706,0.009220407,0.019128075,0.006401537,0.0020181248,0.00019121513,0.000047066285,0.00009734447,0.016125694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99336994,0.0042043696,0.00016569691,0.00055096706,0.0013651289,0.00034392218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945163,0.0033824577,0.00052965665,0.0006047684,0.00050093787,0.000465825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005340413,0.0006261059,0.0006327496,0.00443832,0.005013361,0.011044527,0.0015770129,0.0028717893,0.002753144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008405789,0.00038749332,0.000548731,0.0026098024,0.08233755,0.01705051,0.0058427965,0.005357797,0.00042042247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.6327734e-7,0.0000025262934,0.000044129927,0.0000063979905,5.767622e-7,0.0000064747287,0.0012535572,0.000037862814,0.000010786271,0.9969619,0.0004343753,0.0012407696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033583608,0.0000045375054,0.00007181554,0.000024836427,0.0000012512662,0.000019401896,0.000787339,0.00018365902,0.000016795217,0.978015,0.020869633,0.000002463524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033327262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031020138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011044527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059827375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048637763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043408036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W184234808","doi":"10.3138/utlj.102913r","title":"Habermas: The Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lifeworld; Democracy; Epistemology; Discourse ethics; Sociology; Presentation (obstetrics); Communicative action; Critical theory; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.008568229017063117,"score_gpt":0.23772919759403602,"score_spread":0.2291609685769729,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W184234808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004813396,0.23388983,0.032681245,0.16212459,0.0046925275,0.00008141549,0.00036347407,0.00029988427,0.5610536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62991536,0.12769926,0.019883351,0.021317776,0.0072586033,0.00047224906,0.0004655691,0.00028652695,0.19270138],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964281,0.0023255867,0.00013048065,0.00034003507,0.00056700705,0.00020893864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844235,0.0009341873,0.00016092623,0.000115245515,0.0002264285,0.00012096807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028197623,0.0006670462,0.00064193225,0.0027120549,0.0049587544,0.008554545,0.0010863034,0.004281728,0.009133237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042942306,0.00039911797,0.00044696103,0.0036587513,0.012994551,0.011367029,0.0028111702,0.0037012347,0.0019864682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005707987,0.000002969358,0.00002645803,0.000054343935,0.0000018455336,0.00002312361,0.001497767,0.00007204835,0.000023403258,0.9711231,0.020472074,0.006697167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000094111265,0.000007290486,0.00018473236,0.0002708717,0.0000055823084,0.000054936332,0.0012848785,0.0002948276,0.00010024213,0.6707629,0.32701582,0.000008523084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016381612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009977539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016381612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007390754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042114365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053623915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W186935854","doi":"","title":"Humanist Philosophy: Interview(s) with Bruno Dumont","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cineaction!","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Film director; Movie theater; Poetics; Face (sociological concept); Humanism; Art history; Art; Aphorism; Falsity; Simple (philosophy); Aesthetics; Sociology; Philosophy; Literature; Poetry; Social science; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.028856755691428735,"score_gpt":0.2803088464530557,"score_spread":0.25145209076162695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W186935854","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076080464,0.018744675,0.002478756,0.8131197,0.016005993,0.001418604,0.0013352231,0.00012221467,0.07069437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5276275,0.013920959,0.004146098,0.3370577,0.0024084614,0.004393119,0.0004581443,0.00036653917,0.109621376],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929825,0.0037052175,0.00020231314,0.00082011725,0.00088568183,0.0014042003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868694,0.0063238163,0.0006932433,0.00020620167,0.0020354656,0.0038718253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008001117,0.0008126759,0.0015269258,0.0028532515,0.026353212,0.0074543958,0.0021830052,0.00872279,0.012370063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020416548,0.0011482479,0.00044724383,0.004235485,0.0107221,0.0057539307,0.0048928154,0.020956367,0.0033144525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011938428,0.00019069643,0.0012844052,0.00036683245,0.0000060045104,0.0030616506,0.6361828,0.00010240697,0.001023118,0.01652106,0.33233067,0.008811001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000137524785,0.00002678033,0.0007250058,0.00036392655,0.0000016668112,0.0005324496,0.4248752,0.000092899514,0.00014284157,0.0007395157,0.57244766,0.000038261016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14109401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14684631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14109401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026701786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018224709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28054553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1875507301","doi":"10.4000/vertigo.16199","title":"Nature as an Ancestor: Two Examples of Legal Personality for Nature in New Zealand","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"VertigO","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.04494233927652754,"score_gpt":0.3510050608556039,"score_spread":0.3060627215790764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1875507301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87405723,0.000953229,0.0020790792,0.0027971277,0.00013129086,0.000052720756,0.00005231417,0.000016622722,0.119860336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808406,0.00050470536,0.0010523133,0.00021831591,0.000019890678,0.000022986573,0.000022471486,0.000013436585,0.017305313],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883825,0.00033572633,0.000047756148,0.00013814219,0.00032946083,0.00031067352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987606,0.0003310752,0.00028114847,0.00015663751,0.00014967196,0.00032093807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014409065,0.0002425513,0.00037336684,0.0012084887,0.011083564,0.0028413262,0.0007825233,0.0014088302,0.005991824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003510239,0.00025133052,0.00024394099,0.0017967913,0.014095988,0.0032565983,0.0035149057,0.0022760124,0.000280188],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036254787,0.00003911208,0.018975079,0.00012475492,0.000008826421,0.0051160567,0.8698243,0.000053309635,0.0017697571,0.085709944,0.001808358,0.016534252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024242043,0.00010198604,0.1520894,0.00036981347,0.00003535909,0.008323795,0.6183727,0.00045070244,0.00070165814,0.021824317,0.19758792,0.00011815941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20696762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50237167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20696762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006282044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004155044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41152585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1900646854","doi":"10.21083/csieci.v6i1.1180","title":"Thoughts on an Improvisation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Movement (music); Visual arts; Art; Sound (geography); Sociology; Aesthetics; Acoustics","score_opus":0.06736142449413225,"score_gpt":0.45133666317355187,"score_spread":0.38397523867941963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1900646854","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017567512,0.014899074,0.005695697,0.685189,0.019319873,0.00009780782,0.000050769322,0.00020314587,0.25697717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.713934,0.00847621,0.003660462,0.14014198,0.009411296,0.00037174803,0.000092300244,0.0007141508,0.12319791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.966974,0.025112694,0.00053226284,0.0014781125,0.0037687211,0.002134213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796053,0.013018535,0.00094148517,0.0010527645,0.002912041,0.0024698738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013421851,0.000946667,0.0004836429,0.0019188009,0.030372059,0.016831897,0.0037116692,0.012103475,0.014156891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036531795,0.00036998693,0.0007602716,0.0012738075,0.049443126,0.015926437,0.010367046,0.023098579,0.0027986786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006456253,0.00004345604,0.00024515172,0.00023330378,0.000006844563,0.0008806833,0.3268397,0.000112356,0.00031399785,0.49200752,0.16785455,0.011397922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000120256855,0.000028745217,0.0001554435,0.00053998566,0.0000027731103,0.0002601985,0.20190324,0.00010311508,0.00021429283,0.051587276,0.7451714,0.000021527612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007120441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010632172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030372059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011646872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056676883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08450431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1904642074","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v8n3p149","title":"Authority and Compulsion in Legal-Historical Method","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Function (biology); Politics; Process (computing); Legal research; Primary authority; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.045688525885523384,"score_gpt":0.3628352194964461,"score_spread":0.31714669361092274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1904642074","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1470173,0.0072521493,0.41104826,0.02091954,0.0015575011,0.0068340627,0.0006276478,0.00020122547,0.40454236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8513242,0.0017450628,0.1170765,0.0022190057,0.00027133158,0.008619147,0.00023776811,0.0001742122,0.018332709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8654476,0.12067814,0.0027325074,0.0041800924,0.0056020003,0.0013596065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8674488,0.10888343,0.005148907,0.010603066,0.006497104,0.0014187562],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09537316,0.0006845663,0.000723768,0.007072446,0.009512826,0.00991214,0.0030398995,0.0021951632,0.01255191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11767247,0.0009371883,0.00047707424,0.005492464,0.038046118,0.012566197,0.008269189,0.0028520878,0.0009968665],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048978145,0.000072881594,0.0025995015,0.00040826047,0.000015980171,0.00031863077,0.18607132,0.00022255833,0.00022279512,0.7871451,0.0018605759,0.021013346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116098556,0.0001048932,0.0027860864,0.0023892429,0.000042770516,0.0008550588,0.17152412,0.0022389118,0.0014274388,0.57419056,0.24424702,0.0000779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035095983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066294554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99048716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009704924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072299736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5043875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905059810","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199352333.013.29","title":"Histories of Crime and Criminal Justice and the Historical Analysis of Criminal Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Historiography; Law; Cultural criminology; Politics; Theory of criminal justice; Political science; Sociology; Legal history","score_opus":0.027349100786533173,"score_gpt":0.24096666665584962,"score_spread":0.21361756586931646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905059810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024481228,0.08903601,0.005152315,0.019709224,0.0010229071,0.000036659003,0.0000833661,0.000037915175,0.8604404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77778924,0.09857502,0.0038096027,0.0030898286,0.0014608393,0.00013933299,0.00015911355,0.0001267119,0.1148504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821633,0.0011646625,0.000046982495,0.00012045034,0.0002990004,0.00015245531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979443,0.0014157394,0.00019876737,0.00012388905,0.00018611737,0.00013120017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012414077,0.00042352205,0.00023228384,0.0041090334,0.0056782155,0.0055882977,0.0007153858,0.0010867977,0.00524728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004213887,0.00027320805,0.00017216659,0.003739415,0.024227468,0.007528955,0.002521928,0.0021961567,0.00042130717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025883967,0.0000053997974,0.00025368732,0.000033785742,0.0000018956338,0.000053396197,0.010269483,0.00013847265,0.000012031876,0.9741088,0.0045946455,0.010525797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034705033,0.000011266027,0.0012749549,0.0006351323,0.0000061517053,0.00016537805,0.013453046,0.00030498026,0.00009312244,0.45538804,0.52865225,0.00001225732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010048137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015769152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010048137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008876685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003445673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06440514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W190514787","doi":"10.29173/alr180","title":"The Law of the Land: The Advent of the Torrens System in Canada by Greg Taylor","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indulgence; Globe; Law; Politics; Reading (process); Law of the land; History; Sociology; Political science; Constitution","score_opus":0.006342513925324302,"score_gpt":0.23449801968690617,"score_spread":0.22815550576158186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W190514787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06927144,0.23130685,0.00037905815,0.25804245,0.0022156662,0.0000933479,0.0007601539,0.00007959418,0.43785143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5990495,0.17503695,0.0006474545,0.022147514,0.0005110752,0.000041982745,0.00029155368,0.000081277,0.20219262],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968997,0.00031459267,0.000048645088,0.00014728527,0.001516174,0.0010736012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701643,0.000516122,0.00012643411,0.00004780553,0.0017168697,0.0005763806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013744942,0.00030029123,0.00042317883,0.0029298938,0.022440886,0.008983535,0.0016980788,0.0029014386,0.00498668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003429881,0.0003710756,0.00026503287,0.006542491,0.010570853,0.002121078,0.0016727223,0.0029820278,0.00040206758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000772944,0.000044489676,0.0066396478,0.00054108986,0.000034225435,0.0011759942,0.040676147,0.000876612,0.0004069221,0.35341543,0.53378254,0.062329657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008963335,0.000011085564,0.015220627,0.00047751662,0.000030225388,0.0001538693,0.03024453,0.000190522,0.0001457745,0.0061376076,0.94730633,0.00007291342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99922895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20640773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20640773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29301542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92045456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W190621740","doi":"","title":"Judicial Recounts: An Inside View","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03084321233387549,"score_gpt":0.29797271433843475,"score_spread":0.26712950200455926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W190621740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013314331,0.2682507,0.00079235324,0.3321847,0.006391452,0.000072042174,0.00084585696,0.000075193515,0.3780734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4200854,0.22750418,0.00081190735,0.16718005,0.008413425,0.00007139924,0.0005963691,0.0002894634,0.17504777],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98157597,0.00359929,0.0005375389,0.0014591311,0.008274483,0.0045536403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9665868,0.010897026,0.0016606343,0.0013418134,0.017775994,0.0017375834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013090138,0.00056436454,0.00082297745,0.0072085112,0.022960825,0.023173178,0.0033592274,0.009229575,0.007443805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028567659,0.00091677695,0.0006662338,0.008343551,0.021245731,0.0068177916,0.0024579358,0.009054922,0.001123686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035815454,0.000015183943,0.0016366296,0.0005465965,0.000025684203,0.0006310864,0.020282974,0.00018649259,0.00030972424,0.3810622,0.54529935,0.049968194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032088856,0.000005200227,0.0026747833,0.00068144134,0.000013270016,0.00006755254,0.005890781,0.000028909211,0.00014603097,0.002877707,0.98758173,0.00002938906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9410763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96716034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9410763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09395581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11754622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6817003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1906704222","doi":"10.5040/9781474200127.ch-016","title":"‘May it Please the Court’. Forming Sexualities as Judicial Virtues in Judicial Swearing-in Ceremonies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.040996763112466555,"score_gpt":0.2905848805109109,"score_spread":0.24958811739844436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1906704222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008368062,0.0121525945,0.0013265603,0.05226058,0.0037696827,0.00002547124,0.000046427536,0.00003085926,0.9220197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5088165,0.0073654316,0.0008983524,0.014735002,0.0031696204,0.00005967138,0.00006646978,0.000104832354,0.4647841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985656,0.0009000465,0.000035971985,0.00008977293,0.00027706148,0.00013160477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881834,0.0007331249,0.00011489925,0.000056141584,0.00015790349,0.0001195365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001275698,0.0003176296,0.00020032494,0.00052021,0.0054153404,0.006651064,0.00046999776,0.0023070134,0.011265436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037363658,0.00021767264,0.00015197274,0.0005797852,0.009414479,0.00481567,0.0014394157,0.0038493432,0.0017235809],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012404769,0.00001705319,0.00025583166,0.00006539582,0.0000024326243,0.00014716641,0.025132222,0.000041821124,0.00011804816,0.7568742,0.20370166,0.013631734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004805711,0.000012855135,0.0010664591,0.00023552896,0.0000021241851,0.00016625083,0.018989703,0.00007915322,0.0001398958,0.046404254,0.9328915,0.000007519523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049023856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011560693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011265436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021658486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014732175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037686586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1909928985","doi":"","title":"Celebrity Newsgathering and Privacy: The Transformation of Breach of Confidence in English Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Transformation (genetics); Data breach; Political science; Internet privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.01147502700469516,"score_gpt":0.24901232516916486,"score_spread":0.2375372981644697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1909928985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.479656,0.0013196288,0.0029067227,0.08944174,0.00025417123,0.00002262849,0.00008534196,0.000038980543,0.42627478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99365634,0.00010514154,0.00010349025,0.001399695,0.000048470825,0.0000059356753,0.0000067156307,0.000013018019,0.00466127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923488,0.0039616986,0.00023649567,0.0006744354,0.001134756,0.0016438755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731593,0.017894205,0.0033808188,0.0018650136,0.0017153035,0.001985321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069300486,0.00015405165,0.00028193434,0.0009593172,0.012337274,0.017278649,0.0012255914,0.00626673,0.0076885717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035731792,0.00034080294,0.00029425212,0.0012552381,0.031109521,0.010575357,0.008224889,0.0075377645,0.0005329534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008075629,0.00008985916,0.006145115,0.00003242645,0.000012388064,0.00065353705,0.3152994,0.00010534937,0.0003377155,0.65803474,0.006731951,0.012476696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056358782,0.00011563818,0.020476455,0.000281062,0.000047850976,0.000802891,0.43650082,0.0010470973,0.0018642636,0.29344562,0.24524638,0.00011551594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020831445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017376592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020831445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044569043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049648946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04142034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1917536846","doi":"10.1002/j.1939-4640.2003.tb02718.x","title":"Bioethics and Law Forum*: Murder in Modesto: A Viable Argument","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Andrology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University College of the North","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitution; Wife; Sociology; Political science; Criminology","score_opus":0.027433550584525113,"score_gpt":0.3256434857003094,"score_spread":0.29820993511578425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1917536846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00051233685,0.0033616798,0.0001147003,0.97887826,0.0063640377,0.000011716324,0.000011162002,0.000006810791,0.010739288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019372376,0.0021302751,0.00022814826,0.93985254,0.013483373,0.000087360924,0.00001561031,0.000032328262,0.02479797],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918636,0.00442021,0.00027681232,0.0010477749,0.001050319,0.0013412823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823877,0.014182009,0.00053271104,0.00035299046,0.00076381315,0.0017807572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016608482,0.0008446963,0.0009987026,0.0012045044,0.016371926,0.01758466,0.004146921,0.07924791,0.011225935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030554416,0.00076794456,0.0010610345,0.00082765083,0.029033732,0.01630364,0.008370208,0.050039973,0.00209199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041001564,0.00006693018,0.00024045444,0.00010791188,0.000009980098,0.00046769515,0.0032484902,0.00007668426,0.00011817435,0.35001737,0.6379858,0.0076195076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084305415,0.000047798745,0.00054056617,0.0009801205,0.000018980254,0.00018700442,0.0053559584,0.000275425,0.00014203419,0.110182285,0.88210905,0.0000764684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018644577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022911564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07924791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009349983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01191971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08783507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1918249196","doi":"10.21083/csieci.v6i1.1082","title":"Speaking Justice, Performing Reconciliation: Twin Challenges for a Postcolonial Ethics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Université de Montréal","keywords":"Ethos; Improvisation; Economic Justice; Injustice; Sociology; Status quo; Law; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Environmental ethics","score_opus":0.17045248832576373,"score_gpt":0.472837609750909,"score_spread":0.3023851214251453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1918249196","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101108074,0.020771649,0.038356636,0.44552886,0.0018722996,0.0001228592,0.00003098586,0.00013332286,0.3920752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97347486,0.002079946,0.003660637,0.009654069,0.00049673044,0.00013714087,0.0000111070385,0.00008447425,0.010401034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9582588,0.03219819,0.00084557757,0.001792765,0.0040559205,0.0028487153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756511,0.017086692,0.0012867831,0.0021643462,0.0019725114,0.0018384918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03132035,0.0008114927,0.00095369306,0.0023796593,0.02176849,0.027167832,0.0037207613,0.011303182,0.003175996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02282698,0.00040410398,0.00053758913,0.0023263907,0.21707846,0.019494414,0.014441614,0.017232567,0.00060366536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006898973,0.000010767831,0.00006463083,0.000029114482,0.0000020655727,0.0000613321,0.06474722,0.00005619483,0.000048900918,0.93079156,0.0011958159,0.0029855112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015729942,0.000025194406,0.00024972262,0.0003246751,0.000004243767,0.00011992753,0.10388231,0.00028209848,0.00020924867,0.8105879,0.08427773,0.0000212359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008708856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077070748,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03132035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016708683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015138354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16563982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1933742864","doi":"","title":"Reverberations of the Victim's \"Voice\": Victim Impact Statements and the Cultural Project of Punishment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; Punishment (psychology); Legitimacy; Criminal justice; Narrative; Politics; Harm; Criminology; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Political science; Rhetoric; Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.04279169543574837,"score_gpt":0.3611413490536276,"score_spread":0.31834965361787926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1933742864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40585914,0.0030303034,0.016267642,0.04748102,0.0007969199,0.000055792178,0.000039157374,0.00007916777,0.5263908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947582,0.00028450505,0.0003754009,0.0007787387,0.000073607356,0.000014681106,0.0000042315146,0.000020697913,0.0036900048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866996,0.011120946,0.00017083988,0.0003982281,0.0010306155,0.0005798949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99194473,0.005184932,0.0010972644,0.0006299221,0.0007610048,0.00038206723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075432956,0.0005034289,0.0002710525,0.0013222164,0.0084809875,0.009853819,0.0017086009,0.003089824,0.003067688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016893676,0.00030686794,0.0002475768,0.00064510154,0.048628204,0.007528695,0.0070551448,0.0057787285,0.00031585852],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030398629,0.000029705152,0.0014455628,0.000054182834,0.000010645785,0.0005561343,0.48428905,0.00011038782,0.00040937163,0.5003072,0.0020521951,0.010705174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023550449,0.00010157346,0.0056758933,0.0005300875,0.000050917406,0.0013480104,0.66919595,0.000932499,0.0023785324,0.18525118,0.13442974,0.000082088445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041498877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005221376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009853819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036097066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022622342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03989321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934119559","doi":"10.21083/csieci.v6i1.1084","title":"The Creative Life of Law: Improvisation, Between Tradition and Suspicion","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jazz; Improvisation; Meaning (existential); Law; Sociology; Aesthetics; Allusion; Betrayal; Literature; Art; Visual arts; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.0627462091811588,"score_gpt":0.4057802339121077,"score_spread":0.3430340247309489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1934119559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23778899,0.022335153,0.02475002,0.18616033,0.0012521014,0.000085037595,0.000034913708,0.0002305628,0.5273629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98963445,0.0012214881,0.0010174118,0.002843144,0.00036170363,0.000035118166,0.0000068973022,0.00006739625,0.004812277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9623728,0.027552823,0.00070633716,0.0022759773,0.005126128,0.001966029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95204484,0.0368688,0.0035023734,0.0032660565,0.0017193207,0.0025986158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016142048,0.0005695837,0.00059535285,0.0038552135,0.022431113,0.03587418,0.002528113,0.0069967383,0.0031821476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048233565,0.0006808904,0.0004956734,0.0023276329,0.18499213,0.027087262,0.016604643,0.013352208,0.00069032336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000281847,0.000030089364,0.000735047,0.00004169725,0.0000062130525,0.0003332133,0.23112325,0.00008694432,0.00012833042,0.7532504,0.0030616298,0.011174994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052814692,0.00006745594,0.00088275765,0.00060369883,0.000012507951,0.0006825991,0.15456702,0.00070013123,0.00038666948,0.72542006,0.11656372,0.00006070713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004829795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004374307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03587418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013420537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00705427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09737325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W19342343","doi":"10.1109/tip.2009.2016141","title":"The Direct Voice in Legal Discussions on Equality: An Essay","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Legal writing; Political science; S Voice; Law; Legal research","score_opus":0.036460389191473944,"score_gpt":0.30752007773832013,"score_spread":0.2710596885468462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W19342343","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002481824,0.03612694,0.005803738,0.7721941,0.015331562,0.000013591481,0.000048844176,0.000046872166,0.16795251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36186835,0.05274654,0.007052276,0.36570245,0.041628074,0.00016175333,0.000089691006,0.00044729453,0.17030354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945135,0.0029436378,0.00015795724,0.0005764236,0.001316905,0.0004915551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904013,0.0076713716,0.0003415522,0.00049156084,0.0007326757,0.00036149405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00775863,0.00038872703,0.0004012056,0.0010818461,0.008003725,0.008634993,0.001444683,0.01288418,0.007493336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017582145,0.00030579726,0.0004975034,0.0011081626,0.029187327,0.015758337,0.004957571,0.0155602405,0.0025322204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072909415,0.000009525217,0.00010294448,0.000042082058,0.0000039494203,0.00008347534,0.004824433,0.00008238591,0.000040177885,0.8241752,0.15198983,0.018638665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006680039,0.000008602998,0.00019805945,0.00039676105,0.0000032882544,0.0001385702,0.0034958539,0.00018635744,0.00009617381,0.26505244,0.7303977,0.000019481753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035881805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004835852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01288418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040622437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028912781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041032076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1934411121","doi":"10.18740/s4x01m","title":"Book Review: Anarchy and Art: from the Paris Commune to the Fall of the Berlin Wall","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic history; Art; Berlin wall; Art history; Political economy; Fall of man; Sociology; History; Law","score_opus":0.04391812296340387,"score_gpt":0.3331382233664979,"score_spread":0.28922010040309404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1934411121","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000079642996,0.9803668,0.000022713342,0.0068494133,0.006837408,0.0000053619415,0.00010118419,0.0000066739344,0.0057307663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027587612,0.9619194,0.00007791382,0.0071901414,0.0092494525,0.000034631306,0.00021025882,0.000022001872,0.018537387],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991615,0.00020835592,0.00007045199,0.00011511337,0.00034734633,0.000097290154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978587,0.00089754054,0.00027834182,0.000055817214,0.00074567675,0.00016386484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010422614,0.0011730554,0.0016107032,0.00824547,0.0012347737,0.003967454,0.0013260727,0.0026591315,0.023218766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038088122,0.00065679994,0.00047062922,0.014177396,0.002616119,0.0030682117,0.0014418385,0.0029803568,0.0051213256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017031556,0.000007737981,0.00009979814,0.0026152087,0.00001997585,0.000043744847,0.00015757512,0.00004505003,0.000029769299,0.0020684246,0.9510409,0.0438548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007032503,0.000008726014,0.00092953246,0.0028330088,0.000015047509,0.000114248935,0.00017859538,0.00000490412,0.00001181853,0.0003710314,0.99551976,0.000006155869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07845934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005120104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006640235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07767457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1950649876","doi":"10.1177/1329878x0110000112","title":"Court on Camera: Television Coverage of Australian Legal Proceedings","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Media International Australia","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Law; Futures contract; Political science; Project commissioning; Federal court; Publishing; Sociology; Business; Supreme court","score_opus":0.038101987489077935,"score_gpt":0.33420738307263,"score_spread":0.29610539558355203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1950649876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34899274,0.029165449,0.0013987873,0.02537058,0.00060919736,0.00011164592,0.0021682514,0.00009566089,0.5920877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9279513,0.017963802,0.0008345167,0.0027890273,0.00077346223,0.00005406041,0.0008341355,0.00006777262,0.048732042],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969406,0.0009419872,0.00012712147,0.0001474791,0.0016189789,0.0002237433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984916,0.008656653,0.0021052023,0.00053547125,0.003297828,0.0004888819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016158065,0.00013666457,0.00014995704,0.009561801,0.0023417606,0.0032140205,0.00060444284,0.000996819,0.016841944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02231853,0.00016599779,0.00012558492,0.010154133,0.0014159186,0.0017906518,0.0019407416,0.0010951291,0.0006776322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019789104,0.00009161929,0.029632969,0.0022647334,0.000058671023,0.004300962,0.17315695,0.00062675594,0.0036420599,0.08308301,0.1562709,0.5466734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010565848,0.00012180213,0.27379328,0.0019236055,0.00009414904,0.0016929858,0.046966705,0.0010958482,0.001563637,0.0048410078,0.6678397,0.000056698595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.104972295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14039944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.104972295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035810785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002753085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20872259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1951200305","doi":"10.21083/csieci.v6i1.1219","title":"Truth in the Telling: Procedure, Testimony, and the Work of Improvisation in Legal Narrative","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Improvisation; Aesthetics; Legal culture; Representation (politics); Law; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Literature; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.041762094373933994,"score_gpt":0.39483023938398404,"score_spread":0.35306814501005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1951200305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2847419,0.025309617,0.07999237,0.0884215,0.0011403484,0.00021661399,0.00007737739,0.00013961976,0.5199607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849584,0.0022122823,0.0045165,0.0011380899,0.00013528255,0.000081420134,0.000013857899,0.000053128126,0.006890992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9684425,0.0280707,0.0004889353,0.00067199604,0.0015738594,0.0007519996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95323664,0.041612417,0.001789156,0.0016840986,0.0008921924,0.0007855937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01936381,0.00074066967,0.00049150817,0.0026482379,0.014930546,0.015860396,0.002015302,0.0055413786,0.0034944457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040666923,0.00047293399,0.0004271173,0.001707309,0.08676146,0.01682508,0.009773676,0.0051780767,0.0005455009],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027481095,0.000016167462,0.00024264012,0.00010873701,0.000005931205,0.00045922035,0.36533317,0.00023884108,0.00021672754,0.62504387,0.0010422543,0.00726499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003292915,0.00006879681,0.00053724257,0.0010473389,0.000014105215,0.00093799754,0.31615892,0.0010743386,0.0017174587,0.54291725,0.13544641,0.000047267353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032977953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030479608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01936381,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049294056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003819665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1024068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1955593708","doi":"10.3917/drs.081.0299","title":"De la justice de l'ordre à la justice de la solidarité : une analyse des discours légitimateurs de la judiciarisation de l'itinérance au Canada","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Droit et société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013111831213943364,"score_gpt":0.34734361021837445,"score_spread":0.3342317790044311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1955593708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7744055,0.0015145218,0.0034581255,0.024083126,0.00010292385,0.00006745291,0.00016854827,0.000026105923,0.19617374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874271,0.0003502738,0.00019357086,0.0003374883,0.000007585264,0.000009484068,0.00001808985,0.0000088674715,0.011647555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959352,0.0007017473,0.000060309576,0.00025302853,0.0015224079,0.0015272576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965379,0.0010169289,0.00041648542,0.00016069267,0.0011300455,0.00073794945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019947174,0.00025828846,0.00036789876,0.0011685593,0.024582593,0.009460737,0.0012296682,0.00158428,0.0044114594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00591589,0.0002316237,0.0002518525,0.0025193875,0.020966502,0.0015126474,0.0039359867,0.004454085,0.0001861049],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000467142,0.000036600366,0.021554252,0.00008806085,0.00002514746,0.00047299595,0.3963421,0.00087437197,0.00065520796,0.5515766,0.0055145873,0.02281335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022091004,0.00005015971,0.08956218,0.00041991402,0.00006545529,0.00020125802,0.5350138,0.0019087037,0.0009468741,0.032383632,0.33930907,0.00011683031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9781451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98812777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0950669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0950669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.118981436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6897619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1958945035","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4495","title":"Converging Feminist and Queer Legal Theories: Family Feuds and Family Ties","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Family ties; Sociology; Gender studies; Queer theory; Family law; Criminology; Political science; Law; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.01907978739100149,"score_gpt":0.3096303091375563,"score_spread":0.2905505217465548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1958945035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06951212,0.06631867,0.007560908,0.16806602,0.0006935014,0.000044266868,0.00011712812,0.000032829084,0.6876546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92611784,0.025415223,0.0016220687,0.0065194736,0.0004627657,0.000092940376,0.00006544724,0.000032301214,0.03967192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961474,0.0023807492,0.000070327274,0.00030095014,0.0005863885,0.0005142401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99503314,0.00354839,0.00035105884,0.00017782589,0.0003777474,0.0005116954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005542424,0.00045254483,0.00051736686,0.004547195,0.01479323,0.010557311,0.0020241626,0.0041758423,0.008353187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007122576,0.00025259051,0.00027376995,0.0028401131,0.059570283,0.012692591,0.0056364886,0.004219028,0.00039270084],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037834209,0.000009426275,0.00039476488,0.000020062818,0.0000013483798,0.00011038445,0.05206966,0.000051709758,0.0000088182705,0.93623316,0.0026691037,0.008427804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007144985,0.000013837885,0.0020732651,0.0008857496,0.0000072971025,0.00021699688,0.14996986,0.0003350477,0.00007301367,0.6163656,0.2300345,0.000017702163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07955259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.090101294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07955259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025836399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0079302965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18745708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963569351","doi":"10.1111/1467-9337.00177","title":"Legal Obligation and Aesthetic Ideals: A Renewed Legal Positivist Theory of Law's Normativity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Law; Positivism; Order (exchange); Legal positivism; Philosophy of law; Legal realism; Legal norm; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Legal profession; Epistemology; Comparative law","score_opus":0.01342387843461227,"score_gpt":0.27873197737541416,"score_spread":0.2653080989408019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963569351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.122192204,0.005395527,0.10692495,0.13167524,0.0015315786,0.000049533977,0.000029098284,0.000108867185,0.6320931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824682,0.0010643399,0.0076596057,0.002089069,0.0005639324,0.000044435048,0.000007292915,0.00003907969,0.0060640764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99371994,0.0040462865,0.00011674961,0.0003264518,0.0014383796,0.00035214316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99364567,0.0035983352,0.00063126197,0.0007358912,0.00087344414,0.0005153822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076421294,0.00025258836,0.00036328033,0.0015202573,0.003698907,0.008349633,0.0014167286,0.0022866921,0.0017349082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009178586,0.00027483434,0.0003971673,0.0006957584,0.05432166,0.0102502955,0.004838604,0.005493144,0.00026748815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019893434,0.000008727629,0.00006697053,0.000005099129,5.18732e-7,0.000010227677,0.00288118,0.00007221861,0.00002780309,0.99467814,0.00034666687,0.0019005309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049459454,0.0000078958465,0.00016607973,0.000021084245,0.0000012996286,0.0000270944,0.0014120856,0.0004952649,0.00005935885,0.9843204,0.013478425,0.0000059970434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015433199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017399704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008349633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045657866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025269433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040415943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966623002","doi":"10.1350/ijep.9.2.73.64809","title":"The Contextualised Court: Litigating ‘Culture’ in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Multiculturalism; Legal culture; Law; Contextualism; Order (exchange); Sociology; Political science; Cultural issues; High Court; Cultural diversity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.06074616941425492,"score_gpt":0.34884126494175843,"score_spread":0.2880950955275035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966623002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6872143,0.0144841075,0.002946144,0.10306985,0.00047872725,0.00011032993,0.00021092522,0.000030206022,0.1914554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99188906,0.0022597937,0.00040458507,0.003181002,0.000023860632,0.000010520784,0.000020847549,0.0000073642727,0.0022029176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867677,0.0035643524,0.00045696952,0.0009814607,0.004898611,0.0033308312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98234,0.007049073,0.0015090602,0.00056694716,0.0053566867,0.0031783357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071843397,0.00023237224,0.0005728738,0.002186188,0.031157415,0.015725017,0.0023742984,0.0028545966,0.00336897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027568344,0.00048236898,0.00033820458,0.006171334,0.026336493,0.004412662,0.008313872,0.005733611,0.00010823003],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012387408,0.00008057896,0.03552126,0.0003557873,0.00012159358,0.002392706,0.35216314,0.0014779879,0.001052994,0.5135749,0.017079389,0.076055735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075045224,0.000102719336,0.10009362,0.0019080795,0.00022508575,0.0006793268,0.50172013,0.0023757713,0.0014897094,0.076349705,0.31459033,0.0003904142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98868483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99473476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15697125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15697125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22604108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9777939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967042906","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00371.x","title":"<i>Dark Speech: The Performance of Law in Early Ireland</i> . By Robin Chapman Stacey. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008. Pp. 368. $59.95 cloth.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.01577648221892393,"score_gpt":0.24831167005991656,"score_spread":0.23253518784099264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967042906","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01151193,0.39576346,0.0003940222,0.3118183,0.017124964,0.00007156685,0.001117155,0.0002048684,0.26199374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20004764,0.16709745,0.0006249102,0.03765432,0.0077495174,0.0001459546,0.0011019843,0.00047421388,0.5851041],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984126,0.0004975199,0.000059883467,0.00010646873,0.0004890603,0.00043448003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982103,0.00053182914,0.00036144414,0.000070394526,0.00036187217,0.00046424248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021435837,0.0008771143,0.00048106702,0.0018575487,0.0046913647,0.0059709293,0.0016997464,0.00282379,0.019589178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006560028,0.0006867736,0.00032346457,0.0023368716,0.0069308816,0.005919531,0.0051577343,0.004272405,0.005901975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028747792,0.000011148765,0.00048955285,0.00025835758,0.000005143756,0.00013151279,0.009543356,0.000023926676,0.00008691379,0.0037723198,0.95264435,0.03300467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004603868,0.000019560908,0.0077436273,0.0014098105,0.000005924877,0.00032523475,0.027792871,0.000031371488,0.00014183408,0.0013406067,0.9611549,0.000029644563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1636454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39117947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1636454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008235529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007757379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32538575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967955858","doi":"10.7202/018420ar","title":"Les effets de vérité du discours de l’ADN pénal au Canada 1","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.19076216313633762,"score_gpt":0.34349734257170794,"score_spread":0.15273517943537032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967955858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89601356,0.00206642,0.00029925047,0.023190634,0.00015050574,0.000050842624,0.0006589883,0.000030809508,0.077538975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780437,0.000752316,0.00009569537,0.0010239832,0.000025149946,0.0000115484545,0.00009849908,0.000014284979,0.019934807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99371296,0.0012889748,0.00013639635,0.00032849287,0.0028484971,0.0016847738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9798165,0.006003508,0.004094134,0.0006099553,0.0065206564,0.002955226],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018153216,0.00023108062,0.00039560892,0.0011047554,0.0066844244,0.0036060314,0.0013152242,0.0019291916,0.01143494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0239552,0.00025504947,0.00035511566,0.0017230748,0.004214185,0.00083143153,0.0024877293,0.0032150107,0.00046089644],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011281685,0.0006221904,0.68844664,0.00035477921,0.00028826093,0.0017915623,0.047931936,0.002519954,0.0014889723,0.08432064,0.045552153,0.12555477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011254479,0.00030497997,0.87478215,0.0005756177,0.0002500361,0.0003620708,0.04473494,0.0019121077,0.0013697001,0.0044271587,0.07103691,0.00013178652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9703499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98311794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04059872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04580593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29456574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968393765","doi":"10.3366/soma.2011.0008","title":"The Space of Difference in Law: Inquests into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Somatechnics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inquest; Officer; Law; Impunity; Criminology; Trespass; Harm; Sociology; History; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.01813726967188939,"score_gpt":0.3141499876881292,"score_spread":0.2960127180162398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968393765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81334025,0.0050686137,0.0007203949,0.10750664,0.0013455681,0.0001237471,0.000085732085,0.000034796725,0.07177435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95956933,0.0035612916,0.0005385817,0.014210431,0.00039165822,0.00006832657,0.00007078199,0.000050334605,0.02153919],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939329,0.0033548975,0.0001855537,0.0003403111,0.00074678013,0.0014394922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99117297,0.0042520002,0.0009657809,0.00037269093,0.0014535731,0.0017829426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006624455,0.00049623573,0.00052200264,0.0014352703,0.040228672,0.009419755,0.0029429751,0.0048906268,0.004299835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022664832,0.00072378176,0.00047299758,0.001218737,0.023909831,0.0073409597,0.010692325,0.013008326,0.0006904181],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005223598,0.000007418653,0.001312785,0.000018904544,0.0000015274359,0.0010500735,0.9920779,0.0000037239101,0.0000588984,0.0024805893,0.0018146476,0.0011683402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.279142e-7,0.000006666902,0.001070394,0.000045535075,0.000001919784,0.0002114106,0.98804885,0.0000058316477,0.000027643717,0.00034427596,0.010230587,0.0000061972155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4076941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62560797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4076941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018809663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018805798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8106421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969795194","doi":"10.1017/s0047404504293058","title":"<scp>Susan Ehrlich</scp>, <i>Representing rape: Language and sexual consent</i>. London &amp; New York: Routledge, 2001. Pp. ix, 174. Pb $26.95.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language in Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Pseudonym; Meaning (existential); Criminal trial; Sexual assault; Sociology; Criminology; Sexual violence; Law; Psychology; Political science; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Poison control; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.03130729098443812,"score_gpt":0.31042639408595835,"score_spread":0.2791191031015202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969795194","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010159011,0.66020745,0.0014154152,0.17482916,0.00825393,0.00007342072,0.00070079154,0.00017480185,0.1533291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031301443,0.60851586,0.0022167987,0.056874134,0.01255786,0.00028061378,0.0008342762,0.00033572392,0.28708327],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989153,0.00043253147,0.00007588048,0.000078528465,0.0004188806,0.00007885026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704945,0.0021892765,0.00019541841,0.000063636006,0.00033725172,0.00016498259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013414028,0.0014554572,0.0005642268,0.0033997775,0.0027102088,0.0034459908,0.0017365953,0.004696618,0.041987848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066559203,0.00069889514,0.00032911723,0.005120871,0.0030979645,0.009110731,0.0023532966,0.003184578,0.016353078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000986189,0.0000067678557,0.00009263907,0.00027985836,0.000003139066,0.00012693077,0.0017264067,0.000025891568,0.00005556163,0.006571497,0.9527408,0.03836057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000765308,0.000008649602,0.0022109502,0.0012458266,0.0000063281777,0.00050596806,0.0065816105,0.00009080561,0.00014421092,0.016660258,0.97251916,0.000018470635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03947998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0968803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041987848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024025834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002236399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1404633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974575705","doi":"10.1353/jls.2006.0010","title":"Introduction : Culture in tne Domains of Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Multiculturalism; Political science; Charter; Legal culture; Duty; Sociology; Cultural heritage","score_opus":0.010528088118361176,"score_gpt":0.2565177635383239,"score_spread":0.24598967541996272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974575705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036349674,0.081575304,0.0073127933,0.37648585,0.11446009,0.0001540059,0.0016717707,0.00020356299,0.41450155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0857575,0.08642383,0.007551708,0.21511176,0.08394895,0.00047207583,0.0016556374,0.00046579575,0.5186127],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991912,0.00032120937,0.00004805688,0.00012237114,0.0002127856,0.00010446038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980248,0.0011854543,0.000076236174,0.00006624828,0.0004197275,0.00022754427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009194967,0.0007409842,0.00038123576,0.0013638046,0.003663402,0.004464447,0.0009856847,0.0033678578,0.03232199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025943655,0.00024917908,0.00046386183,0.0016780101,0.0025332274,0.004325411,0.002217283,0.006630781,0.0069919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000137816105,0.000024310511,0.000414476,0.0002012678,0.0000034002783,0.000065435066,0.0035300716,0.000067335306,0.00013530973,0.15953338,0.8092855,0.026725648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002702447,0.0000075930407,0.0008921704,0.00036597392,0.0000019995182,0.00008435111,0.0013177292,0.000059847727,0.00004263473,0.014653448,0.9825644,0.0000071343957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0144746015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020002283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03232199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002855407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019803047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10812783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975199556","doi":"10.1353/rpc.2012.0034","title":"\"I've never murdered anyone in my life. The decisions are up to them.\": Ethical Guidance and Cultural Pessimism in the Saw Series","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religion and Popular Culture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Torture; Pessimism; Ideology; Sociology; Law; Aesthetics; Political science; Environmental ethics; Human rights; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.039028112250320046,"score_gpt":0.33441868714170553,"score_spread":0.2953905748913855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975199556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45128644,0.0050411173,0.006509561,0.20809792,0.008017232,0.00006436843,0.000101021615,0.00012115163,0.32076114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94241345,0.0014289301,0.00085423427,0.016847072,0.0008632147,0.000030254805,0.00002232437,0.000062445906,0.037478052],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976261,0.0016290783,0.000043296124,0.000117141826,0.00036274086,0.00022166948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969511,0.0015941543,0.0005309177,0.00017378114,0.0003781313,0.00037193004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022616573,0.00041210672,0.00019488858,0.00026472125,0.0075110286,0.0048777084,0.00054546376,0.0015427418,0.0027916608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007875917,0.00020742732,0.0001869691,0.00020696265,0.01464481,0.0031563654,0.0023520633,0.008719942,0.00042506566],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118276184,0.0000707008,0.0043451707,0.00022744398,0.0000332312,0.0022674727,0.6058023,0.00015396405,0.004282583,0.19787844,0.15720618,0.027614305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017433533,0.00015448709,0.004364535,0.00044666973,0.000021908902,0.0020026625,0.37687856,0.00025387047,0.0018909174,0.012501032,0.6014223,0.000045598626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030742793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007479278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075110286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016846538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095931493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012223065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975901435","doi":"10.1191/1743872106lw039oa","title":"The Mild, Mild West: Living by a Code in Canadian Law and Film","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Law; Frontier; Jurisdiction; State (computer science); Mythology; Individualism; Code (set theory); Legal history; CONQUEST; Political science; Criminal jurisdiction; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.012342087746674961,"score_gpt":0.22703157676331087,"score_spread":0.2146894890166359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975901435","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25440982,0.0069919406,0.0017151923,0.10378729,0.00093142246,0.00006104326,0.00027473585,0.00008218321,0.6317464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628879,0.0024057538,0.00052311993,0.003947755,0.000075569995,0.000018454484,0.000056740904,0.00004526019,0.030039536],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979699,0.0004917653,0.000027261438,0.00018228545,0.0007177841,0.0006110164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982679,0.0005346508,0.00011938326,0.000070533126,0.0005404387,0.0004671704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014505776,0.00034197525,0.00022532156,0.0021257054,0.036154855,0.012851685,0.0010609986,0.0018905452,0.00596928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005155481,0.00023762711,0.00015171588,0.0030458854,0.029913347,0.0039691958,0.0035267984,0.0030684713,0.0002680409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037922047,0.000024777182,0.0040540807,0.00007210657,0.000007633886,0.00045614803,0.5409441,0.000118191005,0.0006074638,0.3513616,0.06453454,0.037781443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006953854,0.0000144665355,0.010494246,0.00017269858,0.000014534352,0.0001566698,0.5419112,0.0002163125,0.00033032428,0.014308555,0.43232188,0.00005225039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98283815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99337727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086205706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.086205706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05931018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6254691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977429318","doi":"10.5539/ibr.v6n4p25","title":"Appeals and Cultural Values in Chinese Television Commercials","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Business Research","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; Appeal to emotion; China; Product category; Product (mathematics); Clothing; Appeal; Marketing; Cultural values; Uncertainty avoidance; Business; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Individualism; Law","score_opus":0.07387406034719018,"score_gpt":0.4544504171340595,"score_spread":0.3805763567868693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977429318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99406415,0.00009559947,0.000038089198,0.00006818523,0.0000025102813,0.0000064269516,0.000014402396,0.0000016080685,0.0057090577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995307,0.00008130272,0.000031369542,0.000013108535,0.0000038888697,0.0000021569153,0.000011098524,0.0000010230199,0.00032535577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934644,0.00017048417,0.000052828138,0.000058079764,0.00027955868,0.000092616414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803895,0.00074881327,0.00055878935,0.000109811386,0.00030988717,0.00023366183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010295729,0.00018975665,0.00015367621,0.0024026462,0.0012720065,0.001853466,0.0002144391,0.00022950867,0.0019733356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003402543,0.00012484727,0.00019847506,0.0024559398,0.0018720333,0.0007062457,0.000753584,0.00036347815,0.00009017852],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024084584,0.0002322159,0.74148726,0.0002978342,0.00009714176,0.0020440554,0.1711231,0.00027171726,0.0073694405,0.008773182,0.000995977,0.067067176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008690794,0.00005479687,0.95670044,0.000050478742,0.000046431403,0.00030909062,0.03719337,0.00068614096,0.0005114042,0.00077058765,0.0036415905,0.00002699022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038748406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03648147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038748406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017896678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083139155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07704574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978331068","doi":"10.3138/cras-s032-03-03","title":"A Thousand Brooms, A Thousand Buckets: Accountability and the Institutional Investigation of Scandal1","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Broom; Spell; Apprenticeship; History; Archaeology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03522582040942804,"score_gpt":0.31290404899919066,"score_spread":0.27767822858976265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978331068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23644392,0.028056806,0.003121426,0.20362177,0.000829009,0.00007286497,0.00012261696,0.000056086228,0.52767545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99237835,0.002284863,0.00014242626,0.0023176982,0.00014773691,0.00001981235,0.000010147821,0.000011300531,0.002687541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9756501,0.018007925,0.00044943969,0.0008398605,0.0023925477,0.002660168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95908815,0.027210193,0.0065691895,0.001661416,0.0032030314,0.0022680662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016518157,0.0002880094,0.00038905864,0.004859096,0.013395962,0.014679434,0.0018733703,0.005421739,0.003497662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042625576,0.00036782966,0.00026422172,0.0052181403,0.06520801,0.013813996,0.0059666573,0.003819052,0.00028684424],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033245873,0.000033113956,0.00842512,0.00011365975,0.000017048156,0.00044508922,0.05664853,0.0002753638,0.00005084269,0.9032851,0.017923541,0.01274931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031538286,0.000041126852,0.026508348,0.0014386841,0.000032833745,0.00027917733,0.20688908,0.0011894715,0.00020675354,0.60698956,0.15629199,0.00010147067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060530134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.070025854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060530134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014374829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01883098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120355606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981101189","doi":"10.1177/1474474007072821","title":"Turning theatre into law, and other spaces of politics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cultural Geographies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Amateur; Bureaucracy; Local government; Government (linguistics); Credibility; Public administration; Political science; Legislature; Democracy; Political theatre; Sociology; Law; Media studies","score_opus":0.01415365849002361,"score_gpt":0.29254192441203536,"score_spread":0.27838826592201177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981101189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38999993,0.0015943103,0.012035616,0.0076093627,0.0003365188,0.000101332545,0.00014076832,0.00009958055,0.5880826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98813814,0.0004317495,0.0013019933,0.0004313462,0.00003357529,0.000043261934,0.00003647811,0.00005107609,0.009532394],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99072987,0.0061816,0.0001624932,0.0005153996,0.0011007688,0.0013098858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99605596,0.001972074,0.00048048547,0.00038783014,0.00049194176,0.0006116533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035026427,0.0005484806,0.00034398522,0.002551131,0.012761188,0.020342974,0.0012398786,0.002513189,0.0076982947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008291661,0.00028380245,0.00035221592,0.0022715891,0.043097306,0.007879986,0.008210062,0.0025572025,0.00066914957],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005618611,0.00006225739,0.00850085,0.00021397052,0.000011990102,0.00055890495,0.50804776,0.0006520059,0.0009425547,0.45297757,0.0054971413,0.02247885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010771306,0.00006313976,0.008024864,0.0002335992,0.000011016196,0.00034899096,0.77703106,0.00039348184,0.0005091252,0.035978135,0.17736985,0.000025949996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042498067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07845406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042498067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009043027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004948042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084501386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981681819","doi":"10.1007/s10612-011-9141-0","title":"Moving Images Through an Assemblage: Police, Visual Information, and Resistance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Criminology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Resistance (ecology); Assemblage (archaeology); Criminology; Sociology; Process (computing); Movement (music); Workload; Political science; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.08263733653730503,"score_gpt":0.3713094107375606,"score_spread":0.28867207420025554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981681819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7666634,0.0035563349,0.016386915,0.017364373,0.0002799234,0.00012083491,0.00019364264,0.0001356089,0.19529903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886451,0.00089189917,0.0050953114,0.0002712608,0.000091422415,0.00003425095,0.000044611552,0.00008078509,0.0048453677],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987457,0.0006691679,0.000036492806,0.00016556347,0.00024608284,0.00013690918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99532145,0.002565045,0.00096626923,0.00032866801,0.0005166284,0.00030192907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015179927,0.00042748387,0.0002540544,0.0029528812,0.00391636,0.01063984,0.00071182026,0.0022282188,0.012620718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017706666,0.00056559045,0.00028258475,0.0016506857,0.006587752,0.00892509,0.0034353295,0.0016558338,0.00075931556],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056602625,0.0002802625,0.03527422,0.00068542524,0.00011744571,0.0016513898,0.5555452,0.0023441252,0.0112142665,0.17631909,0.019607447,0.19639514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008729133,0.00031603943,0.11769221,0.0012081664,0.00020874044,0.001650504,0.59875405,0.00757379,0.0037691125,0.13950466,0.12899971,0.00023573155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011683112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015700445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012620718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012734345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010089874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042220533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985443918","doi":"10.1353/jls.2006.0004","title":"The Bounds of the Permissible: Using “Cultural Evidence” in Civil Jury Cases","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Jury; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.04581076056291083,"score_gpt":0.30658041977118866,"score_spread":0.2607696592082778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985443918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45476255,0.018069409,0.055142242,0.081272386,0.00088377926,0.00057920977,0.0007150571,0.000069322894,0.38850608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917713,0.001211763,0.0041962843,0.0015513251,0.00015767108,0.0001643308,0.0000545349,0.000008936041,0.0008838354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8510286,0.10787241,0.01106497,0.0037197585,0.022056881,0.0042572715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39155546,0.5487476,0.020285543,0.01304251,0.023527076,0.0028417327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09909965,0.000485559,0.0011500804,0.013875165,0.005102413,0.017587673,0.00517246,0.008249616,0.006176457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4975589,0.0008996825,0.00091501814,0.008181237,0.033894792,0.023301277,0.012268687,0.00800388,0.0003485177],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030556775,0.00008637934,0.022896692,0.0010602477,0.00025744468,0.0016097646,0.04963065,0.0026399153,0.00023682989,0.8696341,0.0044247024,0.047217734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086881366,0.00022524138,0.030051788,0.006819117,0.0004712108,0.0011258092,0.06545925,0.006259078,0.0024608723,0.8330056,0.053750828,0.00028441916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015671518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028191453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9843285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073309285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009603015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5240953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985725567","doi":"10.1353/sel.0.0084","title":"Swearing Justice in Henry Goodcole and The Witch of Edmonton","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in English Literature 1500-1900","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witch; Economic Justice; Political science; Art; Law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.012983212604540583,"score_gpt":0.30617913652301776,"score_spread":0.29319592391847715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985725567","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14317119,0.034218065,0.000892709,0.28438595,0.0028056696,0.000029378776,0.00003067653,0.000044972876,0.5344213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7515356,0.005960693,0.00036022512,0.032718614,0.0007197858,0.000024725641,0.000008676819,0.000052506224,0.20861915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988041,0.00054889865,0.000011821717,0.00009140897,0.00021661226,0.00032719548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990426,0.0006301563,0.00005167732,0.000028025075,0.000085827,0.00016167325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001968257,0.0002602085,0.00024675834,0.0006856896,0.018366834,0.004880945,0.0006113077,0.0031716921,0.0038493397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028124645,0.0002484278,0.000101803744,0.0004957133,0.020388152,0.0033857503,0.002981258,0.0048484183,0.00029750515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020177951,0.0000213835,0.0003176774,0.00004195375,0.0000030593592,0.00067920896,0.24571815,0.000054877502,0.00016893084,0.6352052,0.10603348,0.011735891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007750043,0.000018201688,0.0015374573,0.0003371122,0.0000044098147,0.0002832182,0.11193259,0.000050038965,0.00022688179,0.044529557,0.84104717,0.000025592819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1796705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37708616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1796705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010192878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005909929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35724944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W198710432","doi":"","title":"Free Speech is Far Too Important to Be Left to Unelected Judges","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Democracy; State (computer science); Law and economics; Free speech; Sociology; Politics; Human rights","score_opus":0.01018218412292242,"score_gpt":0.26570135316093224,"score_spread":0.2555191690380098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W198710432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027263468,0.006843297,0.058958866,0.34421733,0.007300526,0.00012490268,0.00009123446,0.00022852761,0.55497175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6758342,0.0027335882,0.0074944617,0.12339908,0.0048411167,0.00020296505,0.00011564435,0.0003776203,0.18500137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9618343,0.014987081,0.0014530813,0.005733157,0.011859709,0.0041326727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9629288,0.022943418,0.0015048608,0.0037726434,0.006002905,0.0028472804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024502859,0.0004703839,0.00097013265,0.0008792668,0.011980352,0.015661964,0.0022892938,0.008092643,0.011307388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052237198,0.00059301336,0.00063428865,0.0007300093,0.03047933,0.014277262,0.0073438273,0.016016396,0.0060630743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025708352,0.000020652948,0.00044159568,0.00007847693,0.00001230097,0.00016804447,0.008734403,0.00013256168,0.00042127975,0.924352,0.040489513,0.025123542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030015999,0.000050806502,0.00053755636,0.000288897,0.000017798959,0.00020043891,0.0067970343,0.00034994105,0.00077709666,0.57106686,0.41982004,0.00006348312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006766337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009617551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024502859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003715254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007292757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12958503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W198772839","doi":"10.14453/ltc.520","title":"Introduction - Justice framed: law in comics and graphic novels","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law/text/culture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Comics; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.012912895693976053,"score_gpt":0.2768107499961812,"score_spread":0.26389785430220514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W198772839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03899002,0.011823062,0.0059916163,0.07142406,0.009875985,0.000050040413,0.00048440488,0.0002355143,0.86112535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82455105,0.0058528217,0.002163484,0.011670715,0.00953986,0.00010966068,0.00035949497,0.00064797094,0.145105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860007,0.00080880226,0.000040075578,0.00018510835,0.0002451651,0.000120842116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977951,0.001394026,0.00021059395,0.00018423663,0.00023010107,0.00018602867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008273303,0.00056063564,0.0002750763,0.0018233202,0.0054406654,0.012572753,0.0006829704,0.0021098363,0.021909093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059062964,0.0001556923,0.00023672168,0.0019735948,0.013438524,0.0066579636,0.0028409222,0.0039219423,0.0023946646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031893305,0.00002223297,0.00038611295,0.0001721003,0.0000037028135,0.00023665486,0.059151776,0.00008306479,0.00034511718,0.8469456,0.07691947,0.015702326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005722239,0.000018872812,0.0005937088,0.00038762394,0.0000032468338,0.00037961398,0.024508366,0.00015229464,0.00036187764,0.048159916,0.9254175,0.00001126165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018716146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002483218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021909093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032817384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088412815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07329321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988948812","doi":"10.1353/ecf.2010.0008","title":"Harm’s Way: Tragic Responsibility and the Novel Form (review)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affection; Harm; Nothing; Law; Liability; Psychoanalysis; Opposition (politics); Philosophy; Psychology; History; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.014735206523434786,"score_gpt":0.28061143686301304,"score_spread":0.26587623033957825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988948812","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000038128845,0.99395895,0.000016923108,0.0033398713,0.0019462763,0.0000032492242,0.00000884468,0.000001962032,0.0006858567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013779728,0.9907832,0.00004508481,0.0043359236,0.00249959,0.000016284968,0.000027609725,0.0000053800654,0.00090889406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988901,0.00040820072,0.00013114266,0.00011789077,0.00035569927,0.00009703017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962054,0.0021272348,0.00070199056,0.00009077717,0.0006338407,0.00024089517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019308056,0.0010211961,0.0013329542,0.0031109715,0.0010739838,0.0050620395,0.0017107405,0.003607173,0.009727502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00862926,0.00042365794,0.00081170426,0.0035698982,0.0031785953,0.0059046475,0.0019034432,0.003965437,0.0028917016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008978802,0.000041903386,0.00018787068,0.03537089,0.00016592421,0.00029632862,0.0011894369,0.000113384776,0.00013416208,0.010554782,0.57131785,0.38053778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016850656,0.000033647764,0.00077033613,0.030730074,0.00007350714,0.00096268975,0.0011389462,0.000020321584,0.000046739224,0.0018666917,0.964314,0.000026093532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031285894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006386971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009727502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002021221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050778803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03254175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989332717","doi":"10.1080/10282580903549094","title":"Disrupting the informal–formal justice complex: on the transformative potential of civil mediation, restorative justice and reparations politics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Justice Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Mediation; Economic Justice; Transformative learning; Politics; Sociology; Civil society; Criminology; Political science; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.057478282414178024,"score_gpt":0.3483828029641069,"score_spread":0.2909045205499289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989332717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3159984,0.094503514,0.01807635,0.105218984,0.0008068249,0.00014862859,0.000048760612,0.000058078873,0.46514046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98541945,0.008511007,0.00081185217,0.0020471339,0.0002820944,0.000043241853,0.00000896271,0.000012462112,0.0028637748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872803,0.009248566,0.00027009056,0.00047837093,0.0017560646,0.00096658606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828802,0.012760966,0.0015487216,0.0008450195,0.0013961125,0.0005690396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010269503,0.00021745857,0.00044054596,0.0022103135,0.0032157216,0.013303536,0.001028348,0.0023851104,0.0034751939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012102677,0.00018086177,0.00029900053,0.001860256,0.035810426,0.008979974,0.0055785626,0.0027639805,0.00027118978],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003777589,0.000062249725,0.002227862,0.00033695207,0.000020429039,0.00027605784,0.023717342,0.0003221124,0.00028721875,0.92027587,0.0023437685,0.050092425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051911895,0.00017790875,0.019528698,0.0015143104,0.000060959497,0.00049550907,0.103731304,0.0012807628,0.00056857546,0.69721395,0.17532495,0.000051127794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004917832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009411625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013303536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004334802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006332378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054310977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990560280","doi":"10.1521/siso.69.1.113.56796","title":"Marx and MacKinnon: The Promise and Perils of Marxism for Feminist Legal Theory","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science & Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminist legal theory; Feminist theory; Feminism; Sociology; Marxist philosophy; Scholarship; Feminist philosophy; Postmodernism; Critical race theory; Gender studies; Law; Epistemology; Race (biology); Political science; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014146913841557283,"score_gpt":0.30165099449644495,"score_spread":0.28750408065488764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990560280","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02261312,0.061433505,0.012958551,0.6817196,0.003071117,0.000028070237,0.000097747856,0.0000937755,0.2179845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87620693,0.026846008,0.007133749,0.03357291,0.004872137,0.00018093978,0.000033735098,0.00015057593,0.05100297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99405587,0.003909889,0.00011277885,0.00045464613,0.0009909184,0.00047587656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857098,0.0122044645,0.000631712,0.0004791837,0.00048442135,0.0004903844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008800782,0.0006848756,0.00049798185,0.002409754,0.0096448865,0.011590996,0.0013807866,0.0043036686,0.0032722608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012171105,0.00036841788,0.00042348975,0.0018629637,0.049306642,0.011263546,0.00532645,0.0062323455,0.00043396914],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011105411,0.0000055007285,0.000077376804,0.000021195363,0.0000020514028,0.000029078661,0.0045369053,0.00011781823,0.000023887813,0.98139006,0.010407274,0.0033777307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008075383,0.000004999747,0.00011581699,0.00012033165,0.0000033788579,0.000029493824,0.0036267282,0.00031457815,0.00011480078,0.9047285,0.09091801,0.000015367294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012743329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014263693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014746512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014746512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007280512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10699391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991360861","doi":"10.1177/08969205030290030802","title":"Book Review: Fearless Speech, by Michel Foucault. Edited by Joseph Pearson. New York: Semiotext(e), 2001","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Sociology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Michel foucault; Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.028121619768822728,"score_gpt":0.33921106851866806,"score_spread":0.31108944874984534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991360861","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000466008,0.9643672,0.00015499255,0.013525022,0.01576505,0.0000099308,0.00010807631,0.00003058211,0.005992616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014988398,0.9037456,0.0003878339,0.0118252095,0.018288301,0.000053304764,0.00028963792,0.00008169566,0.0638296],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992016,0.00017890322,0.00006777047,0.000108394655,0.00039115243,0.000052150423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748033,0.0010503528,0.00017983244,0.00006974433,0.0010109291,0.0002088318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013138802,0.002241218,0.0023123382,0.005976887,0.0012162408,0.0033057434,0.0018259116,0.0029065001,0.029406589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066238935,0.0009258448,0.0007264785,0.006174151,0.0018955356,0.004115232,0.0016049226,0.0035957838,0.028985985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011985057,0.0000050999442,0.000018939016,0.00048823172,0.0000053787094,0.000017352488,0.00003498753,0.00001998067,0.000035923797,0.0006780845,0.95952886,0.03915512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000088428715,0.000009606274,0.00022558864,0.001119284,0.000009791836,0.0002739091,0.00006033188,0.000017424602,0.000041084153,0.0012589111,0.996967,0.000008210195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015547531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028778568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029406589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003254913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005436245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098374784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994765039","doi":"10.5539/ies.v2n3p127","title":"Logic Analysis of Painting Modeling Rules and Avoiding Narrative Viewing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Education Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Painting; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive science; Visual arts; Aesthetics; Psychology; Art; Literature; History","score_opus":0.10878987768609556,"score_gpt":0.4433815105120047,"score_spread":0.33459163282590915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994765039","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08481309,0.0001754455,0.8693155,0.000602565,0.00004802569,0.0001779071,0.00042949873,0.00055479025,0.043883123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6894262,0.00024067578,0.29779658,0.00016647976,0.00006174679,0.0001881949,0.0011813428,0.00024648395,0.010692388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979321,0.0006130196,0.00016517432,0.00040725656,0.000657045,0.00022546509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99516195,0.0025462245,0.0003851299,0.00080445025,0.00092587114,0.00017636745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018381797,0.0004386987,0.00039613352,0.0020917181,0.001327459,0.0045314506,0.0012538885,0.0005984577,0.010459719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009268131,0.000532485,0.0020700584,0.0011475759,0.0022759398,0.005653423,0.0014166981,0.0011981688,0.0008983822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020809077,0.00011933955,0.0036673013,0.000258562,0.00006962223,0.0005447259,0.002487194,0.019595923,0.008164082,0.87396,0.0030875856,0.08783768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007534995,0.00009699015,0.002771071,0.00012285753,0.00017654858,0.0006180148,0.0020490817,0.24566966,0.019802434,0.7028669,0.025677964,0.00007307578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043552117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004059887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010459719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017536326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014831334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034991264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995467287","doi":"10.1163/15718090020523089","title":"Kerry Petersen, Ed. Intersections: Women on Law, Medicine and Technology, Medico-Legal Series, Aldershot","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Health Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Health law; Law; Series (stratigraphy); Medicine; Political science; Health care; Health policy; Geology","score_opus":0.022577565021598005,"score_gpt":0.3011962393458196,"score_spread":0.2786186743242216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995467287","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023699852,0.92106247,0.00040953886,0.03842858,0.0072343433,0.00000932601,0.00013150947,0.000076968936,0.03241017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004035706,0.894994,0.00050519843,0.0040846253,0.005147503,0.000027192724,0.000098347315,0.000089166184,0.09101824],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925953,0.00017933793,0.000061542036,0.00011709351,0.0003105853,0.00007184084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797684,0.0012074533,0.00012997723,0.00006587824,0.00031612205,0.00030372964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012147669,0.0017406414,0.0010183757,0.004032742,0.0020656914,0.005283882,0.0010217684,0.0032183253,0.049754236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045358604,0.0013079123,0.00041014122,0.005203194,0.0022456078,0.0097757485,0.0025727127,0.0025645213,0.018641384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016396209,0.000010196649,0.0001692424,0.0004291335,0.0000052190317,0.00007505174,0.00095555454,0.000068901834,0.000061527746,0.007406275,0.8949821,0.09582056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041718386,0.0000058900955,0.0006375962,0.0012145746,0.0000060190546,0.00027285275,0.00144775,0.00003693065,0.00006044235,0.005135794,0.99116814,0.000009803816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017281087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04445631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049754236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019247001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038104935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16644448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995551914","doi":"10.1177/14614456020040020706","title":"Book review: FRANÇOIS COOREN, The Organizing Property of Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2000. xv + 272 pp. ISBN 90 272 5079 0","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Linguistics; Media studies; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03909009276152836,"score_gpt":0.3244367798644215,"score_spread":0.2853466871028931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995551914","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005183379,0.9839405,0.00019285496,0.0046530142,0.004742361,0.000017096541,0.00022282204,0.000038193644,0.006141361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012133498,0.9516308,0.00042658375,0.0030078131,0.004715716,0.000062046856,0.00046598297,0.000051120678,0.03842664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932563,0.00011343025,0.000062199775,0.00011391679,0.00031890156,0.00006592834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974362,0.0011658869,0.0002367509,0.000056477646,0.0009152084,0.00018944623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011281294,0.0032925098,0.003743567,0.008560593,0.0012248346,0.0032561633,0.002352474,0.002921296,0.057251394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037230419,0.0011716071,0.00082053593,0.013803055,0.001517585,0.0053544105,0.0014781527,0.003411101,0.043044627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027489597,0.000011571372,0.00005424296,0.0020058474,0.000020418425,0.00004232596,0.000064334985,0.00007511967,0.000074017626,0.0008653679,0.92414916,0.07261013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020532112,0.000015884669,0.00039452477,0.0028434922,0.00003139893,0.0004502876,0.000094263516,0.000049497045,0.000074854295,0.0010135187,0.9949911,0.000020649995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021836516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03597029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057251394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003219153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038450803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19152498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996343216","doi":"10.7202/1018985ar","title":"Privacy, Corrective Justice, and Incrementalism: Legal Imagination and the Recognition of a Privacy Tort in Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Economic Justice; Incrementalism; Appeal; Political science; Relevance (law); Privacy law; Privacy laws of the United States; Right to privacy; Seclusion; Sociology; Law and economics; Information privacy; Privacy policy; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.02071936939205474,"score_gpt":0.26659371555057937,"score_spread":0.24587434615852463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996343216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34412533,0.0042945896,0.0049664844,0.14613228,0.00030126682,0.00009477476,0.0000638694,0.000039210903,0.49998224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848083,0.0009523751,0.00052139885,0.0017208421,0.0000319857,0.0000150886735,0.000008917739,0.000010155475,0.01193094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475795,0.0014217165,0.00014262243,0.00046286325,0.0018184724,0.0013962764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959525,0.0022965535,0.00035968533,0.00025155657,0.00069098384,0.00044871078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004008534,0.0002579218,0.0002727453,0.00088993757,0.032646663,0.011291273,0.0020086372,0.0048360582,0.0021345862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009534465,0.0003553827,0.00033381648,0.0013796831,0.06606977,0.005623496,0.0070438,0.0053338977,0.000105709434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002854277,0.000018990842,0.0018725834,0.000035370947,0.0000046224036,0.00079560914,0.21288757,0.00027771093,0.00041272354,0.77225006,0.003993233,0.0074230297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047728216,0.000039043825,0.010717774,0.00028004745,0.000040064708,0.0004972176,0.2855772,0.0012603243,0.0012271779,0.32209158,0.37808418,0.00013769245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91008645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9468492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12290819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12290819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09414766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8917655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996791942","doi":"10.1215/00382876-1162543","title":"Visualizing Sovereignty in the Time of Biometric Sensors","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South Atlantic Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mohawk; Sovereignty; Dominion; Interpretation (philosophy); Polity; Politics; Law; Power (physics); Political science; Popular sovereignty; Assertion; History; Art; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03129558508961648,"score_gpt":0.27641969084705514,"score_spread":0.24512410575743865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996791942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13093615,0.0058681415,0.056915496,0.02760824,0.0016954924,0.00004151695,0.0005109505,0.0003544429,0.7760696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9626082,0.001123095,0.008313258,0.0007729821,0.00027773404,0.000041999407,0.00009425582,0.0001299244,0.026638458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987325,0.0007109062,0.000032987726,0.00014512632,0.00023112565,0.00014742186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982002,0.000958213,0.00027147424,0.00018515743,0.0001868404,0.00019817548],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023381205,0.0003455723,0.00019367298,0.001755057,0.0037309015,0.008841089,0.0006273127,0.0016975073,0.008478698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007960414,0.0002480834,0.0002931911,0.001350248,0.008394029,0.008093458,0.00480695,0.0026638894,0.00080696784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105440755,0.000013841055,0.0036251952,0.00007555804,0.000015446058,0.0008308425,0.15183623,0.00090719643,0.0019335323,0.78526145,0.015689338,0.03970586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016944567,0.000051211708,0.010122374,0.0005854691,0.000021149302,0.0009201415,0.14386997,0.0030382953,0.0015032815,0.21737927,0.6224165,0.00007539905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007665969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013180042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027329936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011779862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028364062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998001869","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2005.0002","title":"Constitutional cosiness and legislative activism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Law; Political science; Charter; Nothing; Constitution; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.012407419558927458,"score_gpt":0.2437157712267815,"score_spread":0.23130835166785405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998001869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021937605,0.004961264,0.0013083204,0.022351013,0.0002221621,0.000015893334,0.00005611537,0.000020183275,0.9491274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94977194,0.0018264945,0.0003137251,0.0024397613,0.00037408315,0.00003669037,0.000046568275,0.000017392402,0.04517342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684626,0.0016100213,0.00009063067,0.0003806489,0.0004728791,0.00059959595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674004,0.002093307,0.00033612325,0.00023630628,0.00023917113,0.00035501085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023772414,0.00016843498,0.00029133118,0.0010723746,0.004975669,0.007946669,0.0008820339,0.0023594867,0.014865534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053136265,0.00017135475,0.00025311174,0.0019212837,0.022318492,0.0040500117,0.0040273736,0.0042137266,0.00065940624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035195974,0.000005365005,0.00014441149,0.000012517484,8.737824e-7,0.000014762316,0.0017032303,0.000036803845,0.000018283296,0.99456304,0.002056662,0.0014405559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001730804,0.000016964308,0.0021462431,0.00028432248,0.000007644867,0.00006939604,0.00825036,0.0003594582,0.00024408939,0.63024175,0.35834998,0.000012447507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009807107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011213595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010288301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036485395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07464719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999051035","doi":"10.1017/s0738248000004181","title":"Robert J. Sharpe and Patricia I. McMahon, The Persons Case: The Origins and Legacy of the Fight for Legal Personhood, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007. Pp. 272. $50.00 cloth (ISBN 978-0-8020-9750-7); $27.95 paper (ISBN 978-0802096289).","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and History Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Sociology; Gerontology; Media studies; Art history; Political science; Art; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.014778620267611004,"score_gpt":0.2442322389960148,"score_spread":0.22945361872840378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999051035","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007238344,0.9140161,0.00071162864,0.062126357,0.0013428901,0.000032501906,0.00027047354,0.000030094114,0.020746097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021973468,0.91860074,0.0013775454,0.013841305,0.0020140018,0.0000991706,0.00029238037,0.000061042374,0.04174034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982173,0.0005946917,0.00013967542,0.00013883304,0.0007081417,0.00020133775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954541,0.0025602093,0.0006053626,0.00009709616,0.000999626,0.00028368447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00274586,0.0013712973,0.0007268057,0.0047035413,0.0035205449,0.0049046283,0.0025963665,0.006315223,0.017931044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006778349,0.0012562004,0.0006258109,0.00577677,0.0040760315,0.009071041,0.0016070664,0.0046584387,0.0063553266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035785368,0.000033262368,0.0005206389,0.0008381783,0.000017725639,0.0001639395,0.002530294,0.00010410636,0.00008886102,0.036178086,0.92872006,0.030769046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028784832,0.00002469234,0.008377779,0.0029950994,0.000045639597,0.00038651627,0.005230151,0.000084023355,0.00038505194,0.041211568,0.9411688,0.000061931605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10229816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22651808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10229816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005494791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006119309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20340544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999317134","doi":"10.1080/10439463.2015.1031664","title":"Policing and contemporary governance: the anthropology of police in practice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Policing & Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Sociology; Community policing; Criminology; Anthropology; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.04711141629712403,"score_gpt":0.369703399992167,"score_spread":0.322591983695043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999317134","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095217146,0.105759725,0.009585843,0.42327946,0.005381756,0.00008106416,0.00008199531,0.00008663199,0.36052632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9178479,0.0469772,0.0027951812,0.009913492,0.0042161704,0.00017787376,0.000039519,0.000095357354,0.01793733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940163,0.0048723123,0.00013107828,0.00018355886,0.00043762077,0.00035910236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954065,0.0033402087,0.00045886435,0.00023632974,0.00022520869,0.00033289273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034202537,0.0005945148,0.00050515216,0.003698805,0.010565034,0.014638384,0.001187151,0.0039400794,0.0026324838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008289235,0.00058488455,0.0002633764,0.005140016,0.040627547,0.013447442,0.004784604,0.004620766,0.0003230747],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016120823,0.000045425386,0.0026209604,0.00018846622,0.000008339456,0.00030651785,0.2728198,0.0003011469,0.000063897394,0.64522123,0.05569738,0.022710688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010336956,0.00003185215,0.0025246185,0.0008950353,0.0000068225436,0.00033442554,0.28159872,0.00039009252,0.00005660601,0.19997148,0.51415676,0.000023202232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007194183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012377925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014638384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045350357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050199185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032904148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999549534","doi":"10.1017/s1472669600002139","title":"Passing the Baton:","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Microform; Commonwealth; Library science; Quarter (Canadian coin); Task (project management); Law library; Work (physics); Digital library; Political science; World Wide Web; History; Computer science; Law; Art; Management; Engineering; Archaeology","score_opus":0.011593095352229892,"score_gpt":0.2619725861859861,"score_spread":0.2503794908337562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999549534","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035801635,0.007095007,0.0037378613,0.4746277,0.05759054,0.00018689306,0.00037123435,0.0017231958,0.45108733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009862249,0.0018831058,0.0015054299,0.06619021,0.004111807,0.00009621661,0.00017851549,0.0009168895,0.91525555],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969874,0.000733531,0.00007664276,0.00047901523,0.0010817535,0.00064164615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934981,0.0004913724,0.00025665434,0.0004802105,0.0015686773,0.0037050154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031894175,0.001008198,0.000647892,0.0012457846,0.019774301,0.0149878105,0.0021006283,0.008024912,0.2447184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014331749,0.00069238135,0.0008163969,0.0008451967,0.0061726733,0.0156268,0.011354304,0.013272819,0.17324623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008926375,0.000018113504,0.00018922193,0.000025785708,0.0000023226223,0.000053134056,0.0020823022,0.000008887453,0.00009351527,0.00686955,0.97609097,0.014557365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023568261,0.000008957647,0.00017425977,0.00008370737,0.0000021597032,0.000082100145,0.004443728,0.000016529726,0.00006514028,0.0020878364,0.9930246,0.00000865926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014021547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030482562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2447184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032238446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005012712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8186646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000983604","doi":"10.3138/md.43.1.1","title":"Dramatic Justice?: The Aftermath of the Holocaust in Ronald Harwood's <i>Taking Sides </i>and <i>The Handyman</i>","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Drama","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parallels; Jury; Witness; Performative utterance; Verdict; Interrogation; Rhetorical question; Narrative; Action (physics); Law; Economic Justice; Space (punctuation); Torture; Sociology; Art; Visual arts; History; Aesthetics; Literature; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.014182363865199756,"score_gpt":0.2578275085766664,"score_spread":0.24364514471146667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000983604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15681918,0.018710067,0.0018349343,0.25355875,0.008013819,0.000043680655,0.000059566853,0.00017688387,0.5607831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8548768,0.0034428963,0.00049109303,0.021270169,0.001850748,0.000040926156,0.000024260804,0.00015323535,0.11784984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759346,0.001585741,0.00001918657,0.00014777483,0.00022030396,0.0004335245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987268,0.0006232708,0.00009069198,0.000058983624,0.00008518602,0.00041499114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019469053,0.00041542508,0.00027999037,0.0004698038,0.01799128,0.008953906,0.0011256101,0.0030760248,0.0053982656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047148187,0.000253351,0.0002096371,0.00033398395,0.019043148,0.0044103833,0.005889371,0.0075654495,0.0008577993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119757446,0.000057647478,0.0004112372,0.00008767143,0.000008549644,0.0021653934,0.3052495,0.000113624286,0.00049322494,0.47292942,0.19535723,0.023006754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025232895,0.000051477902,0.0010093745,0.00021704899,0.0000074724776,0.00067356677,0.13601662,0.0001444852,0.0004992291,0.033663746,0.8276556,0.000036208312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017257385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04055055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01799128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048056166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017020062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034867287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001705126","doi":"10.1386/macp.4.3.331_1","title":"Industry versus democracy: the new Audiovisual Media Services Directive as a site of ideological struggle","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Directive; Deliberation; Political science; Commission; European union; Democracy; Public sphere; Directive on Privacy and Electronic Communications; Public administration; European commission; Ideology; Law; Data Protection Directive; European integration; Business; Politics; International trade","score_opus":0.033511613953115846,"score_gpt":0.3405319065339015,"score_spread":0.3070202925807856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001705126","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12986328,0.0090100365,0.010775331,0.34247065,0.0027466586,0.0000672416,0.000034856046,0.000056953348,0.504975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92669773,0.001722167,0.0019522936,0.031000819,0.0014171646,0.00012531954,0.000019898293,0.00010362547,0.036960967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9644862,0.021952866,0.00093470584,0.002209939,0.0073351352,0.003081173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98150384,0.014308114,0.0012349071,0.0007001128,0.0010556708,0.0011975227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03282763,0.00037192967,0.0006686966,0.002381102,0.017432967,0.031599805,0.0017955141,0.01536967,0.0028817412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027899146,0.0004891262,0.0007049039,0.002536871,0.056332022,0.021176241,0.014660671,0.017674837,0.00053496717],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014588378,0.000012720472,0.00011344101,0.000013474556,0.0000011551483,0.00014879549,0.027398763,0.000029559855,0.00007566983,0.96603763,0.0033222,0.0028320863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053284686,0.000075906704,0.00087745214,0.00039507123,0.000007911267,0.0005577152,0.073985875,0.000588866,0.0006189042,0.37222508,0.5505531,0.000060889768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040718024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004064393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03282763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011289065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0094798505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17361116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001802528","doi":"10.1177/1743872114524879","title":"Biopolitics and the Enemy: On Law, Rights and Proper Subjects","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Appeal; Law; Adversary; Sociology; State (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.01519372437108563,"score_gpt":0.23204221279310872,"score_spread":0.2168484884220231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001802528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0910932,0.021674916,0.02982608,0.14877634,0.0011219269,0.000036571688,0.000029154766,0.000064651096,0.7073771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678334,0.004221013,0.0024086956,0.009192276,0.00068417034,0.000050573843,0.000014683295,0.00006339365,0.015531893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99248874,0.0045641344,0.00019009794,0.0006245049,0.0015139224,0.00061860133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924269,0.005493021,0.0005732386,0.00068421854,0.0005354785,0.0002872594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0089226905,0.00048307827,0.00071189523,0.0018708194,0.008366563,0.010679425,0.001311531,0.006246256,0.005106006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011879813,0.0003064525,0.0004625088,0.0012704453,0.108172484,0.02093161,0.009407509,0.008994022,0.0006343352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027089388,0.0000043226714,0.00005396179,0.0000072056105,7.1180193e-7,0.000024465953,0.0051090633,0.000017444838,0.00003013893,0.99306047,0.00029325887,0.0013961502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073086994,0.000017033459,0.00030513894,0.00023881407,0.0000042483493,0.00007635155,0.0077729253,0.00012751626,0.00019304152,0.9305664,0.060679458,0.000011884909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035473884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030236938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010679425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053946977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003581257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047188282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001857149","doi":"10.3138/cras-s030-01-01","title":"“They did worse than nothing”: Rape and Spectatorship in The Accused","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Midnight; Nothing; Witness; Clothing; Screaming; History; Big business; Law; Art history; Art; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03179041898775045,"score_gpt":0.3320817635755363,"score_spread":0.30029134458778584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001857149","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022641009,0.9223892,0.00004142438,0.029339243,0.0010430489,0.000022911016,0.000094104624,0.0000049662935,0.024424044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19419837,0.79139954,0.00007210269,0.009263751,0.0009934307,0.000050593222,0.000067918365,0.00001552562,0.003938775],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895349,0.0075569176,0.00037046714,0.000384106,0.0014473563,0.0007061514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872312,0.007859386,0.0020071492,0.00041576463,0.001709775,0.00077671837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057649757,0.0006742358,0.0011216978,0.008080954,0.009347828,0.008789725,0.0018864162,0.0050809267,0.0068249633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017401002,0.00076046184,0.00049465016,0.013391174,0.021407293,0.008309634,0.004050162,0.003752054,0.0011459575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001793884,0.00017342324,0.012307624,0.015776062,0.00018296701,0.003277469,0.6705347,0.000048545873,0.00019627415,0.04913727,0.10578016,0.14240608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027749998,0.00008528255,0.02778214,0.030224437,0.00015705936,0.0026510542,0.54797024,0.000014447453,0.00011742309,0.0023218144,0.3885922,0.000056185363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24589434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36022592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24589434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012710064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020273434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48892617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002370664","doi":"10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.11.003","title":"Public opinion on media presence in the courthouse","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law and Psychiatry","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Public opinion; Supreme court; Psychology; Sample (material); Control (management); Public relations; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Politics; Management","score_opus":0.08097828658266772,"score_gpt":0.33398285865759175,"score_spread":0.25300457207492405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002370664","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52932245,0.0022817885,0.0006548104,0.31359443,0.002458788,0.00006158508,0.00062872167,0.000013076331,0.15098436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98026717,0.00060440524,0.00005640377,0.012099955,0.0022532279,0.000019040312,0.00007758544,0.000008615255,0.004613488],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885061,0.0050026462,0.00049599534,0.0009091058,0.0027307246,0.002355461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8801794,0.086482935,0.010886035,0.0018805371,0.015145932,0.005425198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01191742,0.0002757764,0.000374514,0.002377945,0.0069064805,0.0088972235,0.0014482113,0.010562402,0.014879416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08414609,0.00029370587,0.00056379405,0.0023042525,0.0054818657,0.0065746126,0.0028444026,0.00883672,0.0008481757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004055969,0.0011311254,0.2600382,0.0011376889,0.0005363147,0.007053306,0.14443684,0.000970583,0.0063920673,0.24182743,0.2250768,0.107343666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026197103,0.0007792599,0.37780482,0.0021803381,0.0007912243,0.0008416805,0.31587982,0.0019187487,0.005362785,0.030996766,0.26285934,0.0003232144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03233479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030955626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03233479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004884267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038801557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064293206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004801915","doi":"10.7202/1027043ar","title":"Translating Part of France's Legal Heritage: Aubry and Rau on the Patrimoine","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scholarship; Sociology; Reading (process); Legal culture; Political science","score_opus":0.011350053107478797,"score_gpt":0.23885980573493948,"score_spread":0.22750975262746068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004801915","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08229932,0.09473703,0.0032444198,0.49013308,0.009420266,0.0000268218,0.00023158017,0.00014549262,0.31976202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8655768,0.014122013,0.0016116652,0.02633346,0.0021882597,0.000030029349,0.00007135871,0.00012716978,0.0899392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972638,0.0016691015,0.000046178728,0.00020818344,0.00049633597,0.00031645372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975163,0.0014136323,0.0001510367,0.000087148896,0.00067540293,0.0001564779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024103755,0.00052396645,0.00040617562,0.0013192758,0.010064467,0.008637699,0.0006733426,0.0035155385,0.004005704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068272166,0.00019471785,0.00030768116,0.0012791107,0.011786159,0.002914756,0.0014610766,0.0035517444,0.00053663173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000492133,0.000024562749,0.00085086696,0.00010643179,0.000011380692,0.0006380374,0.15462565,0.00026089957,0.00026585945,0.66192937,0.15411235,0.02712536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014143849,0.000032823995,0.0035414011,0.00043566624,0.000010050575,0.00026160324,0.045336895,0.00029942175,0.00032689836,0.028549438,0.92115057,0.000041150295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47835508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51888734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47835508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024048487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010539727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9511415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005574439","doi":"10.1080/00335630500291521","title":"Whither Propaganda? Agonism and “The Engineering of Consent”","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of Speech","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agonism; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.010395613562509289,"score_gpt":0.2560756083630068,"score_spread":0.24567999480049751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005574439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00419744,0.009796519,0.023565289,0.3488144,0.0041771578,0.00010088435,0.00011615538,0.0002547769,0.60897744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56464493,0.00876604,0.013619529,0.102717966,0.004785347,0.0005574588,0.00015251226,0.0007156398,0.3040406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839648,0.011319533,0.00039384005,0.001178034,0.002084433,0.0010593134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98296434,0.012300923,0.000772964,0.002012596,0.0012782594,0.0006709475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014232679,0.00074143347,0.0003632095,0.0012270333,0.0072622104,0.013129814,0.0015965224,0.007565507,0.032434683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03989835,0.0004290692,0.0004536808,0.00084540615,0.037113722,0.017862888,0.005745674,0.009437738,0.006403363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006224435,0.0000040391847,0.000041935178,0.00002689665,0.0000014942576,0.000039348644,0.0025448184,0.000036985784,0.00004572077,0.93153226,0.05801585,0.0077045728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013770268,0.000011812621,0.00012804789,0.00029038754,0.0000040679065,0.00011753441,0.0030573264,0.00021049692,0.0002584236,0.5105563,0.48533353,0.00001834603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004362148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004795804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032434683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052949814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044264547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10850477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005813496","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2265.2009.00564_30.x","title":"The Persons Case: The Origins and Legacy of the Fight for Legal Personhood. By Robert J. Sharpe and Patricia I. McMahon","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Heythrop Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Citation; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.008724915301596237,"score_gpt":0.27669889635864797,"score_spread":0.2679739810570517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005813496","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008129762,0.078708924,0.00035813102,0.8431787,0.002558184,0.000008339526,0.00002462961,0.000009071863,0.0670242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.564559,0.11630461,0.00076561124,0.22054614,0.009714802,0.00008660866,0.000048346785,0.000072448085,0.087902516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601895,0.002321072,0.000091183036,0.00029446374,0.0006679531,0.00060630427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99249846,0.005307141,0.0008178333,0.00022575016,0.00038985768,0.0007609578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061460063,0.00036966644,0.00044715576,0.0010457111,0.012051621,0.008661811,0.0015383243,0.014010771,0.0031964262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01661639,0.0006164931,0.0004448873,0.001281905,0.040746186,0.011971437,0.005913333,0.017778592,0.00054479635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000150446,0.000019404042,0.00067650294,0.00005120056,0.0000070335445,0.00068550167,0.031069895,0.000050015457,0.000036057023,0.75658286,0.19755717,0.013249327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023674254,0.000018831322,0.0027327011,0.0016025212,0.00001780708,0.0011359877,0.0519417,0.00015038451,0.00015583876,0.22921637,0.7129623,0.000041728144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041798312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078569755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9582017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051484695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007984326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083110034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010379983","doi":"10.7202/042312ar","title":"Le droit de la preuve et la pétition en contestation d'élection","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Strong","keywords":"Law; Petitioner; Principle of legality; Mistake; Political science; Parliament; House of Commons; Aside; Local election; Politics; Supreme court; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0054111971640235556,"score_gpt":0.2718214308550714,"score_spread":0.2664102336910478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010379983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036096875,0.024022376,0.03765084,0.07171897,0.0035839407,0.00014658645,0.00022869934,0.00016535047,0.8263864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8624424,0.005789183,0.008367363,0.0077370005,0.0026902144,0.00028193806,0.00009759506,0.00012132542,0.1124729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9683547,0.014522417,0.0018007786,0.0038511064,0.008583054,0.002887816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95674956,0.035478394,0.0018183525,0.0028008297,0.0024587696,0.0006941021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023557402,0.0006674986,0.0014301288,0.0021316996,0.008339035,0.025160046,0.0029276116,0.011522723,0.010410269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061960325,0.0010585438,0.0012805418,0.00254469,0.03555423,0.011012283,0.0056368844,0.016472183,0.0016711337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009436559,0.0000042792835,0.00013091617,0.000020030133,0.0000032448693,0.000059211645,0.0005974999,0.000092436974,0.000023986926,0.9951499,0.0016180071,0.00229111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070656955,0.000065637054,0.0016531657,0.0007011248,0.000035081524,0.00042882428,0.0013359957,0.0016717045,0.0006677049,0.57998025,0.41329697,0.0000930103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038379584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0254536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038379584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01207714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010785316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12458497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012229471","doi":"10.1017/s0003975613000039","title":"Democracy, Courts and the Information Order","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Sociology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Plaintiff; Political science; Democracy; Settlement (finance); Order (exchange); Law; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.00948770156613501,"score_gpt":0.24249595535622648,"score_spread":0.23300825379009146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012229471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4709271,0.006408548,0.026738392,0.07220957,0.00016855459,0.00006920746,0.0001618354,0.00005413269,0.42326272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99722904,0.00038979322,0.00055412884,0.00028722777,0.000038606937,0.000008875134,0.000009163831,0.000002634074,0.0014804698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940078,0.0042378707,0.00019858977,0.0004247788,0.0007409461,0.00039003356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98377925,0.011265281,0.002213599,0.001041233,0.0009462291,0.000754513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045304224,0.00016503349,0.00024519456,0.0013368833,0.0041093635,0.008131613,0.0005970539,0.0016981702,0.0034743918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008374258,0.00020913081,0.00013596399,0.0014367972,0.036724046,0.007304338,0.0030230384,0.0020485062,0.00020728022],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066050293,0.000013824766,0.00088755274,0.000019812129,0.0000022680463,0.00006125247,0.008234037,0.00027018177,0.00007916943,0.98778605,0.00039429075,0.0022450536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015684478,0.000026521895,0.0012073235,0.00008078287,0.0000035752014,0.00010478235,0.009497504,0.0007051415,0.0001727307,0.9641247,0.024048887,0.000012264073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031259018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022503843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008131613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037865888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029590644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027473807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014237474","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2011.595151","title":"Custom as a source of law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04170517480488936,"score_gpt":0.2968302301115839,"score_spread":0.2551250553066945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014237474","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017795165,0.7230857,0.0009397814,0.11189234,0.007944988,0.000024275969,0.0003696213,0.000099640965,0.15386415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08561381,0.34031218,0.0014073798,0.024815133,0.0049807206,0.00008440744,0.0004536044,0.00023211061,0.54210067],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920255,0.00024079547,0.000045011646,0.00017259696,0.00022904274,0.00010997622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993799,0.0002582595,0.00010470713,0.00008468176,0.000086767264,0.00008572876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011555485,0.00090336805,0.00046298123,0.001588625,0.0032129805,0.0070412094,0.0009142447,0.0027472838,0.023979459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003236037,0.00061120605,0.0004181835,0.002219452,0.0062440666,0.009764682,0.0031146368,0.004362229,0.0065196566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001831326,0.000014483929,0.0002952734,0.00028143468,0.000009647116,0.00008250014,0.003060754,0.000107533066,0.00010877004,0.13355765,0.7975657,0.06489789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030363892,0.000005893856,0.0007793316,0.00072235975,0.0000033963292,0.00012773981,0.0013647592,0.00004179946,0.00005772144,0.023434168,0.9734501,0.000009635132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023175934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04873429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023979459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044073253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004085896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08021927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016049755","doi":"10.1093/bjc/azr003","title":"When Two Worlds Collide: Aboriginal Risk Management in Canadian Corrections","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The British Journal of Criminology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Risk management; History; Political science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.04356735537579569,"score_gpt":0.30974330750862017,"score_spread":0.26617595213282447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016049755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7285959,0.0104016615,0.0015166532,0.1287773,0.00067739206,0.0001581547,0.000097579665,0.00007158757,0.12970373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823926,0.00242953,0.0006673754,0.0027251933,0.000050081228,0.000023284116,0.000020712778,0.000030893072,0.011660254],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901308,0.0028352572,0.00025081536,0.0006233332,0.0021556914,0.0040040985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928919,0.0011155208,0.0007832963,0.00026092536,0.0021453488,0.0028030835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048682466,0.00062001735,0.0005130048,0.002403317,0.062243417,0.016794488,0.003930429,0.0041495487,0.005794662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01168173,0.0006203585,0.0005951072,0.0031380397,0.026441017,0.0045063086,0.010696517,0.005935797,0.00034233194],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007824606,0.00007996683,0.024958495,0.00016722,0.000050765382,0.0032968016,0.86590946,0.00052987685,0.00044317538,0.053927448,0.01436276,0.03619577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010447508,0.000036119625,0.023284594,0.00033897904,0.000053437732,0.0005772497,0.8856348,0.00029494392,0.00022855405,0.0055918526,0.08382556,0.0001235188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99530834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15397027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15397027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20597793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98127455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016272497","doi":"10.1068/d4205","title":"Socialisation in a Space of Law: Student Performativity at ‘Coffee House’ in a University Law Faculty","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning D Society and Space","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Performativity; Law; Sociology; Space (punctuation); Legal research; Legal education; Commercial law; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.023015525207897635,"score_gpt":0.26709869173892337,"score_spread":0.24408316653102574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016272497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97117686,0.00016719168,0.00046604412,0.003590242,0.00009791942,0.000022991433,0.000021715932,0.00003094337,0.02442614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99558926,0.000061493665,0.00010121366,0.000252614,0.000021857906,0.000008063321,0.000009992965,0.000016947746,0.003938596],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865348,0.0076440936,0.00017180151,0.00088635576,0.0014602251,0.003302763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874292,0.0027416411,0.0011877518,0.0005262124,0.001157336,0.0069579305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005893691,0.0004890982,0.0007187048,0.0026947395,0.042419974,0.01719803,0.0028502687,0.00270925,0.007965792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010148497,0.000515997,0.00041938337,0.0023522612,0.042774472,0.0044153193,0.01587336,0.0050103767,0.0006674999],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018866202,0.000049655457,0.004156043,0.000010543017,0.000003993017,0.00021237982,0.9868635,0.000029657329,0.00032800838,0.0033920566,0.0013679313,0.0035675312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018675992,0.00003375246,0.004251488,0.000012016805,0.000001899008,0.0000672693,0.9801891,0.00004414002,0.00013252826,0.0003459075,0.0148999,0.000020279529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13696574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25568828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13696574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013820045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010521364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27233702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016504961","doi":"10.1177/0964663912465638","title":"‘Look, a Faggot!’","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Cognitive dissonance; Queer; Neutrality; Rhetorical question; Sociology; Law; Judicial restraint; Consonance and dissonance; Trespass; Rationality; Trope (literature); Homicide; Sexual orientation; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Psychology; Judicial activism; Poison control; Political science; Judicial review; Social psychology; Suicide prevention; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0704233806679287,"score_gpt":0.3881979947561112,"score_spread":0.3177746140881825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016504961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10055236,0.005128974,0.011213676,0.09120116,0.0021769118,0.000048610007,0.00008102969,0.00019807884,0.78939927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9017061,0.00090509315,0.0013794567,0.01559129,0.00037367828,0.000025771213,0.000041203177,0.0001249527,0.07985253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760455,0.0013308383,0.000037025773,0.00020508024,0.00050605787,0.0003165199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998317,0.00096879434,0.00016155922,0.00011939949,0.00031654755,0.000116613366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016880134,0.00035519424,0.00019224345,0.0007644701,0.0074575157,0.004508519,0.00078165834,0.0027607305,0.007665033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007170178,0.0001838617,0.00020099554,0.00041397975,0.014241231,0.0044834316,0.0021845617,0.004788227,0.0019194859],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037219357,0.00002196665,0.0007130698,0.0000956325,0.000007414667,0.0010362823,0.3725392,0.00006305834,0.0010093568,0.5266713,0.074904844,0.022900583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086572345,0.000044432516,0.0013914552,0.00020268066,0.000008463903,0.0007181468,0.14080901,0.00019675627,0.00071966264,0.032399233,0.8234667,0.000034673452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013925192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020591123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013925192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021838737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009993698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027688265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016860751","doi":"10.1080/09695950802439734","title":"Gender, race, bias and perspective: OR, how otherness colours your judgment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Sydney","keywords":"Impartiality; Judgement; Tribunal; Normative; Objectivity (philosophy); Jury; Argument (complex analysis); Neutrality; Law; Perspective (graphical); Commission; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08545973364575674,"score_gpt":0.37778023339192407,"score_spread":0.29232049974616736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016860751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13399687,0.029024681,0.017249959,0.3113365,0.006570138,0.00005478082,0.00014155474,0.00007466699,0.50155073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95436674,0.0047083884,0.0020551572,0.01878278,0.0015542743,0.00004030035,0.000028640472,0.00010101734,0.018362598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865002,0.008641218,0.00025786634,0.001008728,0.0022269527,0.0013649333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98993355,0.006298451,0.0008548543,0.0005273125,0.0012641791,0.0011216131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013653053,0.0004494536,0.0007903716,0.0018097477,0.008080033,0.012169293,0.0012778236,0.0031368006,0.006328355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022389155,0.00020192236,0.0004837342,0.001401776,0.045492824,0.01254345,0.005370772,0.004474353,0.00097361056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047948655,0.000013318328,0.0037591015,0.00014062338,0.000020858748,0.00033092115,0.19748226,0.00005127859,0.00044178966,0.75722295,0.0151629485,0.025325986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019525432,0.00006889174,0.0048047574,0.0011866431,0.000028607428,0.0006169621,0.21085016,0.00015040512,0.0004124519,0.47906607,0.30273676,0.000058712343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01418067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017631138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01418067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00372956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033632575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07220513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018451353","doi":"10.1353/ecf.2006.0035","title":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction and the Law of Property (review)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Property law; History; Political science; Philosophy; Property rights; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01200760138050851,"score_gpt":0.2546545350873063,"score_spread":0.24264693370679777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018451353","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014052351,0.9964097,0.000019769242,0.0014911498,0.00026994036,0.0000017263384,0.0000081355565,7.5553334e-7,0.0016582051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019184763,0.9964371,0.000035803612,0.0006984319,0.00047382957,0.0000030377537,0.000015418102,7.4650524e-7,0.00041710326],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952686,0.0001545551,0.00004918428,0.000054324664,0.0001804726,0.00003456496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955782,0.0033591886,0.0003549892,0.000058423895,0.0005532028,0.00009598095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011037976,0.00037285002,0.0009780388,0.004076653,0.00068574655,0.0025840313,0.00070771517,0.0020573158,0.005989339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00543575,0.00019631494,0.0003497859,0.0062314863,0.0025087427,0.003144608,0.0008887694,0.0013580836,0.0010036683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006325711,0.00007463496,0.001118205,0.035143655,0.0002839668,0.0004978296,0.0018076488,0.00020206785,0.00026540898,0.027693579,0.1665738,0.766276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015534884,0.000032209206,0.0033090007,0.02478752,0.00012190349,0.0009004245,0.0007088121,0.000023654618,0.00009356707,0.005447029,0.96454316,0.000017118304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076716477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015341545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076716477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017570098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036189577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02003634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020665195","doi":"10.1080/14442210600554515","title":"Judicial Conceptions of Tradition in Canadian Aboriginal Rights Law","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Institution; Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Relation (database); Common law; Order (exchange); Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010771814255462583,"score_gpt":0.31089433180079784,"score_spread":0.30012251754533525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020665195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21076664,0.009180253,0.009438046,0.0365804,0.0002516049,0.00005799639,0.00010399236,0.000053992015,0.73356706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880405,0.0013314568,0.0010307918,0.00077642937,0.00004971819,0.000012499025,0.000015277117,0.0000103508155,0.008733011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952526,0.0012546572,0.0001341017,0.0004256873,0.0017717851,0.001161177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99484235,0.002058333,0.00044165837,0.00028790833,0.0018655505,0.00050413795],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004515214,0.00024579518,0.00029944672,0.0029789614,0.020042604,0.011944153,0.0019361492,0.0026601863,0.003100612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010191665,0.00029508566,0.00031365175,0.0030720662,0.04079509,0.004337869,0.0032333143,0.0037979793,0.00012542635],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006446673,0.0000038790918,0.0008150886,0.000019096253,0.0000024878918,0.00012724045,0.051820815,0.00021821495,0.00010455869,0.9407489,0.0012435119,0.0048897224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004451289,0.000040873467,0.024032978,0.00067732343,0.000078217236,0.0006587761,0.1494995,0.0038081121,0.00047216215,0.5492962,0.2711999,0.00019133557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94987345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96333176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9799574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08426939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07060347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61142004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020771747","doi":"10.1353/tlj.0.0002","title":"Law and Film: Where are the Mediators?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popular culture; Legal culture; Statute; Law; Sociology; Legal education; Fair use; Class (philosophy); Legal profession; Political science; Media studies; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010316664066615881,"score_gpt":0.21227367640987874,"score_spread":0.20195701234326285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020771747","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059550186,0.54909676,0.0011353826,0.3055444,0.0048604584,0.00009518043,0.00016752165,0.000039584058,0.13310568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18431057,0.7179192,0.0011601796,0.030871637,0.0067253998,0.0002503863,0.00022398018,0.00011657489,0.058422044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956729,0.002793022,0.00014555057,0.00029702287,0.0005804864,0.0005110029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926945,0.004286526,0.0005652581,0.00023634332,0.0015047868,0.0007125273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005158921,0.00046418005,0.00070580025,0.0021547945,0.004332703,0.01819249,0.0011975459,0.004965413,0.028796991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014300642,0.0004595047,0.00036230762,0.003096716,0.009701084,0.029727323,0.0033280144,0.0050149476,0.0047416002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110159664,0.00015838858,0.0020534277,0.0046416516,0.000040967643,0.00064138504,0.052243266,0.000050788272,0.00059882744,0.41073316,0.29444447,0.2342836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017820601,0.00004179405,0.0023681512,0.00782187,0.00003856676,0.0003368493,0.09586226,0.0000528008,0.0005801067,0.03088731,0.8619623,0.000030120704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011707842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012344312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028796991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065107774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005864185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09633559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021728551","doi":"10.1017/s0008938910001032","title":"Nazi Crimes and the Law. Edited by Nathan Stoltzfus and Henry Friedlander. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2008. Pp. 238. Cloth $70.00. ISBN 978-0521899741.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Central European History","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nazism; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.009302442714454951,"score_gpt":0.19779975116848703,"score_spread":0.18849730845403206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021728551","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00068164774,0.95374817,0.0002826083,0.012063268,0.002077918,0.000009117714,0.00015232043,0.000032188702,0.030952757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03067915,0.8616975,0.0010561417,0.0016636117,0.0020652798,0.000047640802,0.00024923982,0.000065940396,0.10247549],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955577,0.00014436491,0.00003524492,0.000048050304,0.00015382624,0.00006267742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944514,0.00016988505,0.00013822112,0.000037423182,0.00014586897,0.000063527616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071773765,0.0017488069,0.0011125645,0.0033832076,0.0017649159,0.0034052653,0.0009721284,0.0021823873,0.021051798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021423153,0.0012502457,0.00045733014,0.0033993898,0.0032641557,0.0049465257,0.001405733,0.0021945229,0.005885453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035403813,0.000045677283,0.00063086103,0.0009280214,0.00003289955,0.00017747055,0.0027138484,0.00019841878,0.0001886575,0.05343413,0.77535075,0.16626403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010117282,0.000014292276,0.003154507,0.002034996,0.000015420628,0.00062646915,0.0014678447,0.00012602436,0.00013738594,0.028792176,0.96360296,0.000017941135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030023929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063802995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030023929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043896786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045383843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07042527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022138340","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2011.10854457","title":"The Ghosts of Cemetery Road: Two Forgotten Indigenous Women and the Crisis of Analytical Jurisprudence","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Indigenous; Experiential learning; Jurisdiction; Experiential knowledge; Law; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Phenomenon; Property (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04686526225466831,"score_gpt":0.31457251898408045,"score_spread":0.26770725672941215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022138340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94760007,0.0017116739,0.0014286768,0.018584788,0.00029768015,0.00004951372,0.000020486563,0.00003477631,0.030272279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98075384,0.00067431893,0.00084158627,0.0010756577,0.000050480343,0.000026609494,0.0000066114717,0.000029425555,0.016541477],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970028,0.0016246544,0.000060346592,0.0002770194,0.00040540297,0.00062978617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975298,0.0011643433,0.00026516168,0.00018753904,0.00025852985,0.00059468864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035322472,0.0005662061,0.0007535722,0.0014964252,0.033493068,0.0060150656,0.0018782038,0.0052462798,0.0034806365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008391929,0.00067144807,0.0003008876,0.00093425106,0.031773068,0.006286401,0.008167006,0.0066692284,0.00043396335],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008285086,0.0000076386295,0.0002860119,0.000013941532,0.0000010498345,0.0010828325,0.9880426,0.000008500405,0.00015742713,0.008407239,0.00030979427,0.0016747895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002671418,0.000028975512,0.00076541357,0.00006747861,0.0000049019804,0.0012084448,0.9699924,0.000053191547,0.00021428693,0.0023890305,0.025251606,0.000021505599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048243403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07796067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048243403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006339991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053717885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09592521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023009879","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100006578","title":"The Legal Dimensions of Everyday Life","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Everyday life; Sociology; Epistemology; Scholarship; Subject (documents); Argument (complex analysis); Architecture; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.016219827913370302,"score_gpt":0.25597947077581273,"score_spread":0.23975964286244245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023009879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033372264,0.019659402,0.004100044,0.06611285,0.0006126384,0.000030563522,0.00019309355,0.000051040224,0.87586814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9500008,0.006553533,0.001186719,0.0044566737,0.000489878,0.00007279852,0.00010547809,0.000024617733,0.037109546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958188,0.002642026,0.0001501489,0.0003180359,0.0006858245,0.00038518774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707806,0.0013233931,0.0004607707,0.00031193544,0.00036961347,0.00045614582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002042717,0.00030593958,0.00030211185,0.0015809663,0.006796727,0.010011855,0.0007803296,0.002033631,0.012487541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00423497,0.00015051947,0.00021458288,0.0020086344,0.031313363,0.006902406,0.004205206,0.0030636177,0.001213663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005312608,0.000012262139,0.0005360205,0.00004118192,0.000001878103,0.00008421872,0.027998554,0.00007911556,0.00004418268,0.95357186,0.009213108,0.00841226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057638226,0.000018542645,0.0027589784,0.00048476976,0.0000031793354,0.00022962647,0.042901862,0.00017439574,0.0000631124,0.4195525,0.53378516,0.000022171718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011404649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010471679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012487541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069078673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042275065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050120294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023161772","doi":"10.7202/1020618ar","title":"Le tiers inclus et la médialité de la procédure","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Intermédialités Histoire et théorie des arts des lettres et des techniques","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.018266350772332053,"score_gpt":0.310962736688643,"score_spread":0.2926963859163109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023161772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22649954,0.0017474714,0.14796367,0.016972395,0.0005850927,0.00043074889,0.00022572718,0.0004656538,0.60510975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447071,0.00035666584,0.013202701,0.0013846732,0.000115982155,0.00018919534,0.000041266543,0.00019761543,0.039804727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97984195,0.007824204,0.0012846496,0.0029549517,0.0051278262,0.0029665185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865534,0.0055909934,0.001396308,0.0036888046,0.0020200803,0.0007503848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0094134705,0.00033970605,0.00045380063,0.0011100438,0.007276095,0.0077285105,0.001276045,0.0033217582,0.010427446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023099102,0.0006256728,0.0007086013,0.0011824742,0.027208753,0.007865409,0.0077271718,0.004457583,0.0019472167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000691038,0.000015905944,0.0015072472,0.000050064482,0.000009161898,0.00023489613,0.02903901,0.00009559007,0.0020856909,0.9500127,0.001165028,0.015715696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060067978,0.00028663062,0.01355643,0.00070912397,0.00009662668,0.001277255,0.04236045,0.0014588004,0.008484368,0.5466609,0.38491017,0.00013912383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006956255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011782372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010427446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003963262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007150784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049783766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023361810","doi":"10.7202/043041ar","title":"Le modèle communicationnel en science juridique: Habermas et le droit","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012742803453570439,"score_gpt":0.2600932519347269,"score_spread":0.24735044848115645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023361810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024289185,0.0068614245,0.41195336,0.08629747,0.00096096663,0.00025953562,0.00023350133,0.00021256098,0.46893203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79375535,0.0064755627,0.1075561,0.006933087,0.0008734493,0.0008228241,0.00012833651,0.00021422419,0.083241105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98877615,0.0068680816,0.00039299388,0.0010237405,0.0023830342,0.00055598555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903804,0.0058752396,0.0007806763,0.0010493017,0.00148911,0.00042537914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010397088,0.0008096297,0.0007096248,0.003481879,0.005645518,0.011521245,0.0020952746,0.006262426,0.012124954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015404708,0.00052419346,0.00121066,0.0032215915,0.024801217,0.019294962,0.0046528415,0.006428937,0.0013171466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003343193,0.0000028140748,0.000037336675,0.000014043698,0.0000013416824,0.0000085352285,0.0009949469,0.00020313762,0.000020831843,0.99722606,0.000257471,0.0012301027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017073953,0.000021816439,0.00015832392,0.00012937756,0.000012000958,0.00004989757,0.0017560304,0.002396314,0.00022560255,0.93602955,0.059179194,0.00002481118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013875309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009089915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013875309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010487517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010253967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0760926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024055326","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.21.1.1","title":"<i>Rapport minoritaire</i> : La dissidence fait juge","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Unanimity; Vision; Variety (cybernetics); Relation (database); Parallels; State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theology; Computer science","score_opus":0.018422563699260944,"score_gpt":0.2548530868836951,"score_spread":0.2364305231844342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024055326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14297275,0.013087562,0.009309543,0.24786845,0.009713537,0.00006318446,0.00020522482,0.0001563547,0.5766233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9240973,0.003256736,0.001617381,0.009085591,0.0028121446,0.000044590335,0.000052963896,0.000091546746,0.05894168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851495,0.00077854196,0.000043552627,0.0001751078,0.00031326088,0.00017450549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997405,0.0014529299,0.000344441,0.00013427155,0.00035742566,0.00030586496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020597568,0.00031986894,0.00023999605,0.0005485872,0.0050448924,0.005020785,0.00072334695,0.002098761,0.005542085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011114144,0.00013853055,0.00016937184,0.00042993922,0.008289701,0.0036730394,0.002086803,0.0051753875,0.00082900084],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102924736,0.00003723874,0.0037014778,0.00016366837,0.000018544171,0.0015555058,0.29349974,0.00008064753,0.0024092018,0.55321306,0.1110333,0.03418471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013243491,0.00007087179,0.0055214274,0.00031992773,0.000018408717,0.0020147103,0.11744139,0.00028133095,0.0019194228,0.022044804,0.85030514,0.00004935551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016773075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015496007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9832269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022753347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014199628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033350885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025059860","doi":"10.1017/s0940739101771329","title":"Protecting Indigenous Heritage Resources in Canada: A Comment on <i>Kitkatla v. British Columbia</i>","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Property","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; History; Ethnology; Geography; Archaeology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.019454944519240163,"score_gpt":0.2578934088041691,"score_spread":0.23843846428492896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025059860","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0347817,0.0072539547,0.00067743345,0.860086,0.0047574616,0.00013345531,0.0015382499,0.00016452082,0.0906072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.106489144,0.0040609147,0.00087637827,0.7720026,0.0011016809,0.00009682599,0.0002627088,0.00013772988,0.11497202],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951593,0.000281878,0.0002161819,0.00041138046,0.0016882336,0.0022430655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98988664,0.0033176655,0.0004415672,0.00022121049,0.003889542,0.0022434632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003192304,0.0008041434,0.001049901,0.0013649806,0.04140949,0.008641747,0.005831482,0.04016102,0.0073185754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009167747,0.0014217192,0.0012254646,0.0037870817,0.009298726,0.0025145952,0.0029883417,0.028323667,0.0009806112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007840419,0.000031116655,0.0061299945,0.00024030334,0.00005520013,0.0014846723,0.014030439,0.0004717595,0.00087935745,0.029438233,0.9387604,0.008399962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009067767,0.000048193007,0.02591159,0.0009484007,0.00020009061,0.0004110878,0.03461239,0.00066739623,0.0015454661,0.005479579,0.92968655,0.00039868604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06504108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06504108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20001277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47190827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025449700","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2013.16.3.364","title":"The Third-Party Doctrine and the Third Person","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Analogy; Appeal; Narrative; Viewpoints; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Literature; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.04260818328409051,"score_gpt":0.31472707615607504,"score_spread":0.27211889287198454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025449700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043353967,0.011395523,0.096765816,0.059523992,0.0009554722,0.00009867606,0.000088370354,0.00008440363,0.7877338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94843566,0.0027194235,0.009131289,0.006411887,0.000550172,0.00014652942,0.000043858494,0.00007914339,0.03248212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929603,0.003990056,0.00029493222,0.0008524695,0.0014147738,0.00048745473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919076,0.0049999487,0.0006562228,0.0012933346,0.0008167301,0.00032613307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062531624,0.000377621,0.0005346549,0.0011699443,0.006037873,0.0066872365,0.0018309025,0.006754718,0.0035821418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01141666,0.00032706815,0.00060518447,0.00097386335,0.05796027,0.008643908,0.005523523,0.007860789,0.000821157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015337504,0.000001175447,0.000023571509,0.0000075977614,5.9414435e-7,0.00003607952,0.002676908,0.000021357642,0.00002142625,0.996071,0.00057673035,0.00056198833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009334596,0.000013676967,0.00014723952,0.00017207266,0.0000048270153,0.00030875934,0.0034694276,0.00038400476,0.00028491262,0.8828145,0.11237983,0.000011329156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003855208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025414194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006754718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048522823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043239654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0352059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025631202","doi":"10.7202/1000786ar","title":"L’équité judiciaire, de l’ombre à la lumière : archéologie d’une exception singulière aux règles de la publicité immobilière","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.07099168402152997,"score_gpt":0.30654151859586326,"score_spread":0.2355498345743333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025631202","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027186124,0.018268665,0.0076256148,0.078422494,0.0007936488,0.000038809398,0.00014796581,0.000039689592,0.86747706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78127104,0.0041142767,0.0017010086,0.0096530635,0.00039188337,0.000064536194,0.00004906954,0.00006887035,0.20268624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720097,0.0007523588,0.000056498044,0.00053269044,0.0007396393,0.0007179092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998816,0.00030325018,0.00011411372,0.00012029534,0.0004745701,0.00017177007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019496295,0.00045512087,0.00039733696,0.0010771167,0.01550418,0.009430145,0.0014876873,0.004843081,0.00847401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031125615,0.00027297763,0.0004020588,0.001231888,0.031920288,0.004060458,0.002652498,0.0062686694,0.000702479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049661735,0.0000029013854,0.0002674146,0.000011849844,0.0000022295837,0.000058475016,0.0051120277,0.000063685824,0.000037526366,0.98313993,0.008674698,0.0026242887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019505722,0.000023642744,0.007935303,0.0003856754,0.000014660807,0.00020443177,0.013418649,0.00063987763,0.00026849812,0.35804254,0.61899984,0.00004733677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7478345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8287994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2521655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048620645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02977461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5073011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025992289","doi":"10.7202/029657ar","title":"The Colour of Law : Law Is Constituted from the Colour of Right","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Phenomenon; Law; Hue; Rationality; Morality; Statutory law; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.007995913886237698,"score_gpt":0.2468344519254957,"score_spread":0.238838538039258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025992289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035701834,0.0030250521,0.051156096,0.030475935,0.0011766873,0.00004624451,0.000106906795,0.00018082061,0.87813026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96191216,0.0008673604,0.0064305803,0.0044608708,0.00053952273,0.00006200487,0.000040449308,0.0001404561,0.025546586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946957,0.002327154,0.00015370923,0.0006293604,0.0016499199,0.0005442013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543375,0.0022188113,0.00036358563,0.0008662249,0.00074576755,0.0003717718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039964765,0.00032757336,0.00038931132,0.0015205822,0.004100023,0.010372791,0.0008300371,0.0032141644,0.0075525935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009627722,0.00026045673,0.0004761524,0.0010898992,0.051818706,0.011843162,0.005854086,0.0056573995,0.00088832155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053517947,0.0000020936595,0.00007641017,0.000010140747,0.0000010029397,0.00001561394,0.002634393,0.000025235442,0.00012098027,0.99427176,0.00069704145,0.0021399516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009329373,0.000018809957,0.00073720556,0.00008080529,0.000006206304,0.00013612706,0.0027205816,0.00020847659,0.00029308986,0.8774813,0.11828931,0.000018818302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004135845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003089366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010372791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034383326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029313664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025265932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026308701","doi":"10.3138/utq.82.4.841","title":"Victim Impact Statements, New Media Technologies, and the Classical Rhetoric of Sincerity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sincerity; Rhetoric; Rhetorical question; Emotive; Jury; Supreme court; Aesthetics; Plaintiff; Construct (python library); Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011727670495587608,"score_gpt":0.2556086284528361,"score_spread":0.2438809579572485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026308701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083458334,0.028678633,0.04089833,0.12353631,0.0025596095,0.00007600721,0.00008553303,0.00019117359,0.720516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958631,0.005584375,0.0035910108,0.007124265,0.0015226743,0.00009009832,0.000026446427,0.00006577235,0.02336442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902621,0.0067189853,0.00029920405,0.00053279917,0.001785322,0.00040148216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753949,0.020504994,0.0018294137,0.0009309656,0.00090133114,0.00043835433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009560524,0.0005490936,0.0002836469,0.0032897368,0.006465496,0.014228765,0.0013538387,0.0045330166,0.0034691405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018480496,0.00036679965,0.00024682988,0.0018956962,0.06691503,0.013867535,0.0053327214,0.0043450957,0.00055383315],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008881229,0.00000463116,0.00012650111,0.00006234805,0.0000019008926,0.000079765974,0.015310038,0.00006618945,0.00009816511,0.9760122,0.0024001012,0.0058293235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025437786,0.000055967426,0.000885058,0.0008065322,0.000021932885,0.0004717465,0.02713276,0.0007569465,0.0012574138,0.6510727,0.31746256,0.000050886658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004323454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004525823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014228765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00689155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026058871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050561488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026810767","doi":"10.3138/utq.82.4.889","title":"The Hard Case: <i>Billy Budd</i> and the Judgment Intuitive","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Epistemology; Economic Justice; Psychology; Law; Computer science; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.006505221306091446,"score_gpt":0.20281973892517657,"score_spread":0.19631451761908514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026810767","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029983014,0.017612442,0.004883274,0.6632487,0.0034445066,0.000026341077,0.000048125064,0.000043655404,0.2807099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8606483,0.003923831,0.0022381635,0.067289785,0.0012927204,0.00003669536,0.000020167296,0.00008758921,0.06446267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977944,0.0012410355,0.00004642139,0.00021551471,0.0004149257,0.00028783936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981242,0.0011641458,0.00014467517,0.00011437612,0.00019774034,0.00025489423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023851637,0.00023719523,0.00027999064,0.00048817278,0.011876863,0.01042885,0.0006826623,0.0031092595,0.002902378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057655084,0.00035782397,0.00017927344,0.00055557233,0.03700808,0.004946326,0.0033761228,0.010158345,0.00057629583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001720309,0.000010193612,0.0003724102,0.000025789162,0.0000037401373,0.00021656911,0.017953115,0.00010260847,0.0001563687,0.8799584,0.09545384,0.0057297833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020624995,0.000010431366,0.0014217403,0.00026146052,0.0000053978615,0.00025727603,0.020385038,0.00039951663,0.0003677448,0.3536878,0.6231353,0.00004769508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.086097546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10091675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086097546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009795594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049553444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17119277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027544669","doi":"10.1017/s0008423907070126","title":"La question de la liberté d'expression dans les démêlés judiciaires et les revers administratifs de CHOI-FM","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Freedom of expression; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.01770760436734721,"score_gpt":0.34159061997508866,"score_spread":0.32388301560774146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027544669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19033113,0.0035060102,0.008597565,0.053235427,0.00034155007,0.000080506295,0.000117023534,0.000036817575,0.743754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565748,0.00036721185,0.00042226905,0.0016815022,0.000075523916,0.000029377914,0.000015932634,0.000012432964,0.040820885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942557,0.0019978215,0.000112077505,0.0007143295,0.0012148734,0.0017051726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954476,0.0018682438,0.00035567282,0.00036988076,0.0013178646,0.0006407159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058198133,0.00036543966,0.00039171564,0.0007448647,0.0128789665,0.008832435,0.0012886088,0.003135241,0.0072570248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066768927,0.00025063657,0.00034059232,0.00084380456,0.033110514,0.0022590344,0.002817299,0.0053300736,0.0004571928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002731822,0.000009365293,0.0020789912,0.00002895391,0.000009259256,0.0001500907,0.028772432,0.00030339454,0.0002978935,0.9581231,0.0036778343,0.006521424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001164346,0.0001152014,0.030810863,0.00082394003,0.000060858456,0.00028165878,0.075860634,0.0017922892,0.001756673,0.21401751,0.6741991,0.00016477308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7359702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7433986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2640298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050574653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03805188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5311694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028674168","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.23.2.519","title":"A Tale of Two Cultures: Intimate Femicide, Cultural Defences, and the Law of Provocation","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Jurisprudence; Provocation test; Philosophy; Sociology; Theology","score_opus":0.02916426186936547,"score_gpt":0.2698131775472888,"score_spread":0.24064891567792332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028674168","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23014367,0.036885984,0.008339892,0.16897106,0.001552614,0.000046941295,0.00007008174,0.00003711372,0.5539526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97650707,0.0040022214,0.0005589923,0.005471912,0.00031196885,0.0000376225,0.000008548113,0.000020793332,0.013080877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927591,0.005542995,0.00009577417,0.00037141115,0.0005590245,0.0006716917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948133,0.0031045987,0.00069154677,0.00049889454,0.00044237747,0.00044937967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036681201,0.0005038809,0.00042780655,0.0018850976,0.010177754,0.010507216,0.001221642,0.003834421,0.004770289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008829718,0.00027015829,0.00041812196,0.0013527857,0.06604651,0.0085023185,0.008293328,0.007148764,0.00035017641],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021315353,0.000013308335,0.0011835985,0.000045660214,0.0000058387077,0.00016505452,0.052998245,0.00006027723,0.00007681613,0.9377281,0.0019644732,0.0057372283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038571663,0.00010327433,0.006132896,0.0010355063,0.000038739843,0.00064936234,0.24874239,0.00037685974,0.0007376261,0.5454324,0.19664736,0.00006501187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012758117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015315383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012758117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006126627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004141169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04445201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029375586","doi":"10.1017/s0008197306007240","title":"PRIVACY IN PUBLIC PLACES","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Cambridge Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Right to privacy; Internet privacy; The Right to Privacy; Information privacy; Privacy law; Political science; Event (particle physics); Privacy policy; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.02230662484784799,"score_gpt":0.2728034082497127,"score_spread":0.2504967834018647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029375586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08410722,0.0054329187,0.021634784,0.11165845,0.0005659676,0.000044862267,0.00023931939,0.00006138843,0.77625513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96191174,0.0010886957,0.0009631356,0.005380899,0.00031056302,0.000027649576,0.000036205474,0.000014278189,0.030266955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929103,0.0031238256,0.0002455499,0.0008744557,0.001492139,0.001353668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950889,0.0022529932,0.0006621861,0.0011244171,0.00048128868,0.00039029022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037093193,0.00021484695,0.0004127822,0.0004960662,0.0070289746,0.010545334,0.0009154634,0.006404932,0.009639095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0081854705,0.00032281238,0.00054655067,0.0008709647,0.018064298,0.012896577,0.0060699484,0.0049702707,0.0012460253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010091974,0.000011101024,0.00041796677,0.000016389016,0.0000031821564,0.0001981881,0.0044748564,0.00010706894,0.00008915905,0.98441654,0.005028101,0.005227314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013048543,0.000046417626,0.0015753377,0.00025668243,0.000013268267,0.0006974238,0.012508134,0.00054413825,0.00060750614,0.73299825,0.25070226,0.00003757953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008184061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065464093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010545334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034964571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037226689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032245934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029487789","doi":"10.1177/0964663909345096","title":"Signs of the Surveillant Assemblage: Privacy Regulation, Urban CCTV, and Governmentality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Assemblage (archaeology); Signage; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Panopticon; Corporate governance; Law; Internet privacy; Politics; Computer security; Political science; Advertising; Business; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.03218669836749183,"score_gpt":0.3322910759439284,"score_spread":0.3001043775764366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029487789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9040897,0.00079405884,0.0045895968,0.0034837183,0.000031130287,0.000048436563,0.0000761879,0.000024529887,0.08686261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99839056,0.00016197177,0.00054779404,0.000035023342,0.0000070680335,0.000014825263,0.000020323301,0.000005700036,0.0008168131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703777,0.0017104199,0.00013158661,0.00019073498,0.00054601714,0.0003834456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936731,0.0028765453,0.0020223917,0.00042104925,0.0006460387,0.00036083558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017311167,0.00021059152,0.00030071783,0.0025602267,0.003557749,0.007103841,0.0008568325,0.00096580415,0.0039787255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009111135,0.0002734504,0.00019489136,0.0031065086,0.013329319,0.005075371,0.004806574,0.0012682811,0.00017571842],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016575112,0.00014748058,0.12724118,0.0001998972,0.00002886094,0.0011877718,0.20212822,0.002270932,0.0020349887,0.5947713,0.0023090558,0.06751462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019981702,0.00020962325,0.2505429,0.00068925635,0.00006995763,0.0008189651,0.5971458,0.0055535575,0.0025632596,0.086607315,0.055653267,0.00012613105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017945156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04074494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017945156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004890471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025816506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035681427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029513835","doi":"10.7202/039646ar","title":"The Grammar of Customary Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Law; Comparative law; Political science; Normative; Indigenous; Legal history; Sociology; Legal realism","score_opus":0.012417714216767448,"score_gpt":0.2751842133774959,"score_spread":0.2627664991607284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029513835","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027150718,0.0056314277,0.062109802,0.026741577,0.00044824174,0.00004829331,0.0002384111,0.00024288578,0.8773886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94672656,0.0020356467,0.011715366,0.0026259664,0.00032349705,0.000087883294,0.00015250033,0.0001482917,0.03618427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967828,0.0012795434,0.00018257737,0.0005615433,0.0008777432,0.00031566975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971654,0.001500522,0.00020663733,0.00063311576,0.00037895617,0.00011546378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003328269,0.00027321768,0.00034029922,0.0014757012,0.0036813726,0.0058481167,0.0010589169,0.001781535,0.004479415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005957354,0.0003411968,0.00048893184,0.0015569549,0.033428244,0.0067072078,0.0027496598,0.002673048,0.00057769514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.108694e-7,8.6244296e-7,0.000044442797,0.0000045475667,7.933446e-7,0.000007455104,0.00084763765,0.00005552442,0.000013141614,0.9969495,0.0007324388,0.001343135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024874246,0.0000027721928,0.00024293795,0.00003980274,0.0000023815708,0.000048470683,0.00053993263,0.000264029,0.00004865153,0.9405568,0.05824545,0.000006340979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016482957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012771861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016482957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046179728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044032997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033505917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031981910","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0003","title":"Remembering Favourite Feminist Legal Scholarship","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Jurisprudence; Tribute; Empowerment; Feminism; Feminist legal theory; Sociology; Gender studies; Field (mathematics); Critical legal studies; Colonialism; Reproductive justice; Law; Political science; Legal realism; Legal research","score_opus":0.026304113795050342,"score_gpt":0.2712639225398518,"score_spread":0.24495980874480147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031981910","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030082166,0.086715646,0.0012132435,0.81180894,0.03342737,0.000008038363,0.000069012196,0.00006274207,0.06368673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21744242,0.13915086,0.004232846,0.3402609,0.12674944,0.00008863837,0.00013835508,0.00052893773,0.17140765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854584,0.0063675195,0.00043478337,0.0013385242,0.004394753,0.002006055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97873425,0.013956826,0.00083671225,0.0011798397,0.0029365185,0.0023558557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010939294,0.0007525241,0.000833627,0.0040384955,0.017582655,0.019642342,0.002212681,0.007008569,0.0065407893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01628519,0.00043060514,0.00051601866,0.003922313,0.05837309,0.011273007,0.0061447364,0.013085173,0.00149008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028486067,0.000025594405,0.00040683118,0.00031725437,0.000012011116,0.00029100268,0.046519056,0.00008467797,0.00021050803,0.49306154,0.42652345,0.03251954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000232742,0.0000038960634,0.00008303199,0.00027115876,0.0000016561111,0.00007231903,0.0069879065,0.000015843852,0.000058441765,0.015362899,0.9771338,0.0000065797976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06272429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17263752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9372757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023424307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0140785705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16995603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035195492","doi":"10.3138/utq.83.1.39","title":"The Scourge of Plagiary: Perversions of Imitation in the English Renaissance","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imitation; Etymology; Literature; Metaphor; History; Grammar; Colloquialism; Humanism; Whip (tree); Art; Classics; Linguistics; Philosophy; Psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.008463963371794619,"score_gpt":0.2225187681273064,"score_spread":0.21405480475551178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035195492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.764812,0.004690139,0.004665547,0.019767184,0.00029573438,0.000027952783,0.000048259037,0.00016519116,0.20552798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927529,0.00028358513,0.00016556871,0.00040319568,0.00005164006,0.0000047652084,0.0000038716894,0.000029600451,0.006304852],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99456936,0.0036449009,0.00018014955,0.00040636625,0.0007880632,0.00041121853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916756,0.0051734066,0.00077904743,0.0012855191,0.0007775885,0.00030880683],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049024113,0.00035783267,0.00036813386,0.0016099786,0.009929783,0.0063546463,0.0007768065,0.0027791786,0.0021723104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014205915,0.0003670557,0.00022254638,0.0011405972,0.04317113,0.006292024,0.0050835446,0.004970964,0.0004110409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035531444,0.000007321448,0.0014811321,0.00005123163,0.000005168968,0.0008774263,0.8589755,0.00005623379,0.0008663252,0.13075346,0.0013727455,0.005517943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035282377,0.00016775145,0.017781151,0.0005796417,0.00003362994,0.0039839013,0.4697018,0.0009152056,0.0061364616,0.052514303,0.44801232,0.00013859796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0157366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02432818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9972208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008321879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019410666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060379744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038163849","doi":"10.1068/a40157","title":"Simplification is Complicated: Property, Nature, and the Rivers of Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning A Economy and Space","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Contradiction; Ambiguity; Unitary state; Law; Law and economics; Property law; Dynamism; Real property; CLARITY; Set (abstract data type); Natural (archaeology); Epistemology; Sociology; Reading (process); Political science; Computer science; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02120280398463449,"score_gpt":0.23347948389237352,"score_spread":0.21227667990773902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038163849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32057473,0.019808184,0.090598345,0.09718612,0.00026360885,0.000062856925,0.00018118868,0.00036866416,0.4709564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98906446,0.0016072327,0.0032363343,0.0009129191,0.00006253819,0.000021220601,0.000025066054,0.000047484977,0.0050227363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954035,0.0027340953,0.00011227604,0.00043484438,0.00082822813,0.00048697382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936325,0.004305467,0.0006846879,0.0007088156,0.00047918386,0.00018943426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046839383,0.0001881139,0.00049678475,0.0020113173,0.006243812,0.013916618,0.0012334513,0.0021788431,0.0028669785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011864112,0.0004161639,0.0004499219,0.0026575918,0.0447946,0.017581249,0.0060667847,0.0031677792,0.00021073894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064534142,0.0000063034518,0.0006814985,0.000022368276,0.0000037602033,0.00006832555,0.009095757,0.00045126746,0.000054788146,0.9850692,0.0010329315,0.0035072975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011895673,0.000009991659,0.0021910858,0.000111267,0.000012795246,0.00009778543,0.011533472,0.0012854198,0.00015724957,0.9067347,0.07783385,0.00002045476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02538668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030106453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02538668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00790234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004291271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057335734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046180994","doi":"10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210057","title":"Elster's transitional justice","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Political Science","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Transitional justice; Political science; Comparative politics; International relations; Political philosophy; Public international law; Economic Justice; Political economy; Law; Politics; Sociology; International law","score_opus":0.024449617941899735,"score_gpt":0.3189772352781565,"score_spread":0.29452761733625676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046180994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024126958,0.001903535,0.0017993071,0.029209215,0.00061699044,0.00003599551,0.000058723548,0.000035573095,0.9422137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5706982,0.0006609143,0.0006325393,0.014909349,0.00021231605,0.00007188422,0.00003392919,0.000055007422,0.41272587],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972662,0.0007401456,0.000075048345,0.0004596949,0.0003419733,0.0011169798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929106,0.00029499189,0.0000421786,0.00013780406,0.000110418965,0.00012353982],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024799719,0.0003459406,0.0004793893,0.0009474389,0.0112255225,0.009175716,0.0011822196,0.0068052076,0.016635247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004801315,0.0002026155,0.0004350338,0.0007749644,0.013602123,0.005757156,0.0070464187,0.0078532435,0.001714271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000097379325,0.0000064485575,0.000060112816,0.0000054360385,0.0000013535692,0.000043651835,0.0017355935,0.00003084805,0.000012046366,0.9883859,0.007075203,0.0026336939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028904178,0.000017463057,0.00055614806,0.000118228636,0.0000140994725,0.00015286301,0.005782135,0.00024058705,0.00040199785,0.664801,0.3278659,0.000020642903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024644868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04432239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024644868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078092613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005212339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056660473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046394459","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.24.2.389","title":"Why Feminist Legal Scholars Should Write Judgments: Reflections on the Feminist Judgments Project in England and Wales","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Humanities; Redaction; Philosophy; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.07849090665921987,"score_gpt":0.32225329954721565,"score_spread":0.24376239288799578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046394459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5885944,0.0056094364,0.0022509673,0.2574554,0.0014873566,0.00022090258,0.00005867834,0.000042104988,0.14428072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433752,0.0009771727,0.00035991057,0.018014908,0.0001453409,0.0001409153,0.000010916485,0.00005755198,0.036918197],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9192319,0.05689696,0.0018240154,0.0033955898,0.006668425,0.011983121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88974893,0.086552046,0.003531193,0.0025684978,0.008456806,0.009142619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.056020636,0.00041174938,0.0010018708,0.0016688274,0.056654796,0.025118198,0.0032410396,0.010130885,0.008675518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07832848,0.0012768041,0.0004184649,0.0027224491,0.06120761,0.0105227595,0.018799853,0.018989092,0.0010396334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022842522,0.000024154251,0.0009583497,0.00007255891,0.0000031302088,0.0005244589,0.93932086,0.000031252468,0.00014908113,0.05093132,0.0042306054,0.0037314028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013012045,0.000023734614,0.00171661,0.00020183985,0.0000045265915,0.000060189468,0.90819556,0.000041266667,0.00015460125,0.0071353572,0.08242273,0.000030504052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30498147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.413261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30498147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044871185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054597408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60641253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046636493","doi":"10.1353/ecf.0.0165","title":"Manley's \"Feigned Scene\": The Fictions of Law at Westminster Hall","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Law; Art; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.013634123655063675,"score_gpt":0.26417940487406477,"score_spread":0.2505452812190011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046636493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15340677,0.017397977,0.002497889,0.1428528,0.0044207564,0.000057081223,0.0001685175,0.00022505617,0.67897314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78764564,0.0032682184,0.00062977243,0.0073426855,0.00066240015,0.000028707298,0.000032107444,0.00012934612,0.2002611],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914145,0.0005132303,0.000011063056,0.000056482066,0.00015075666,0.00012690408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991616,0.0005321022,0.00006554235,0.000037066413,0.000078071505,0.00012568774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061430124,0.0003689185,0.000184556,0.0010118898,0.010330433,0.005671185,0.00075849687,0.001843162,0.0074577485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032168801,0.00022538626,0.00012627682,0.0005817148,0.0104542235,0.0027290948,0.0019153829,0.00412304,0.0007373759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052840216,0.00004437781,0.00063986564,0.00010296761,0.0000067125898,0.002193448,0.3498316,0.00014867989,0.000667662,0.31046835,0.3085518,0.027291711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004559538,0.000022403825,0.0009250327,0.00017451022,0.0000040043924,0.00044871925,0.06921943,0.00008937249,0.0007195472,0.0061873076,0.92218995,0.000015141459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027328689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075722456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027328689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062375423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014409861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05433923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047250823","doi":"10.2979/victorianstudies.55.4.749","title":"&lt;em&gt;Codification, Macaulay and the Indian Penal Code: The Legacies and Modern Challenges of Criminal Law Reform&lt;/em&gt;, edited by Wing-Cheong Chan, Barry Wright, and Stanley Yeo","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; Criminal code; Law; Penal code; Criminal law; History; Code (set theory); Sociology; Political science; Art history","score_opus":0.027530654562569715,"score_gpt":0.27339520601410067,"score_spread":0.24586455145153097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047250823","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020220133,0.47406995,0.001426911,0.09152895,0.022054194,0.00009773525,0.0006886407,0.00023374983,0.40787786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045652304,0.34462413,0.0018832323,0.013129038,0.0064703957,0.0001588656,0.00091269956,0.0004277747,0.58674157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983734,0.0003242194,0.00009446604,0.00020800522,0.00078529253,0.00021454091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883264,0.0003363417,0.00012080803,0.000076121054,0.0004631067,0.00017101645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011273775,0.0013716533,0.0004743912,0.0021047245,0.0033441924,0.011387721,0.0013137157,0.0024599147,0.04061676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032062498,0.00054381293,0.00041927464,0.004658295,0.0044281697,0.0068567055,0.002624371,0.004206498,0.011381233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014534623,0.00001503389,0.0001914081,0.00036116884,0.0000038696853,0.00006799484,0.0018506611,0.00009763413,0.00013181746,0.052675173,0.8585884,0.0860023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000206085,0.0000036643626,0.000780914,0.00049204397,0.0000022160211,0.00006309374,0.0014125161,0.000051136405,0.00007222917,0.0040202495,0.9930861,0.000013863267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.115222685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14109455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115222685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00900645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017177643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22910404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049873349","doi":"10.1177/026975800901600201","title":"Victim Reparation and the International Criminal Court","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Victimology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Crimes against humanity; Victimology; War crime; Criminology; Law; Human rights; Tribunal; Poison control; Political science; Sociology; Child abuse; International law; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.01708999207539553,"score_gpt":0.3615870228589141,"score_spread":0.34449703078351857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049873349","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060571987,0.009196268,0.0019193749,0.022138162,0.0007552249,0.000053388347,0.00006668377,0.000048203754,0.9052508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9088989,0.0041164365,0.0006703394,0.009973792,0.0008747669,0.00008816626,0.00008654628,0.000060380273,0.075230576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99000376,0.0030921611,0.00037563487,0.0016987653,0.001699433,0.0031302324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99373525,0.0021407334,0.0010926819,0.0007887419,0.0012601007,0.0009824575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057487935,0.00030975055,0.0005974891,0.0034406486,0.0109520955,0.015480898,0.0024834613,0.0067490255,0.018491283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018156197,0.0004167288,0.0006827631,0.0024074994,0.016166594,0.008491584,0.011221317,0.010813297,0.0014543134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020359359,0.000053242748,0.0025648654,0.00001782006,0.000012657796,0.00039753364,0.0055073015,0.00010345974,0.000052324147,0.9635411,0.012807377,0.014921914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008724801,0.0001353186,0.01833064,0.0009428795,0.00012278669,0.001907009,0.024724467,0.0013182107,0.00090296526,0.38176775,0.5696113,0.00014936636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030214423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03214859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030214423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00941919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005470255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068341315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052390337","doi":"10.3138/utq.82.4.974","title":"Genre, Critique, and Human Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Sensibility; Romance; Aesthetics; Focus (optics); Fantasy; Sociology; Critical theory; Intersection (aeronautics); Literature; Philosophy; Epistemology; Art; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.006446724735878386,"score_gpt":0.24085002120231697,"score_spread":0.2344032964664386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052390337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046412416,0.019923212,0.005985781,0.043244254,0.00087543053,0.000027469952,0.000036920646,0.000048654307,0.88344574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9606246,0.0054322197,0.0015425998,0.0025741803,0.0011689828,0.000042452717,0.000022972306,0.00006186201,0.028530248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99057883,0.0063697714,0.00025125284,0.0004620176,0.0017208852,0.0006171728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811426,0.0135509195,0.0016184257,0.0013963389,0.001124831,0.0011669169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008829005,0.00045816504,0.0006437878,0.005213254,0.0073727807,0.01630836,0.0010519039,0.0033775081,0.009103248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021453697,0.00017814572,0.0003471581,0.003729415,0.054305423,0.0101139285,0.0063325185,0.003180646,0.000587732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005028959,0.000008391984,0.00050916296,0.00003528645,0.0000028253062,0.00005225613,0.020239415,0.000047782647,0.00004286347,0.971077,0.0015239196,0.006456194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011848319,0.000026219022,0.0014918626,0.0004259036,0.00000663476,0.00016687685,0.021843363,0.00017751688,0.00013069068,0.8376529,0.138053,0.000013212021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059679644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066908957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01630836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008665366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004030052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06287193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053099764","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100009741","title":"Screening Desire: Same-Sex-Marriage Documentaries, Citizenship, and the Law","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tying; Humanities; Citizenship; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Law; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.018571504265824126,"score_gpt":0.25516831146442404,"score_spread":0.2365968071985999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053099764","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38048545,0.0061786287,0.00059922744,0.07447276,0.000732949,0.00009293902,0.0003818663,0.000034590346,0.53702164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716897,0.0015558334,0.00013493249,0.0038481476,0.00016700916,0.000031817035,0.00007160977,0.000014522985,0.022486374],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554634,0.0024567991,0.00017957707,0.0002392682,0.0010144367,0.0005634986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98104537,0.014471439,0.0018625552,0.0004807211,0.0013337247,0.00080626074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044958075,0.00015424303,0.0001880205,0.0022252758,0.008173819,0.011101337,0.0008396703,0.0023851856,0.013007072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018054292,0.0001838724,0.00012319142,0.0030219203,0.00923999,0.0066658584,0.0041581388,0.003175492,0.00053904834],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006003762,0.00015465714,0.018211124,0.00029399642,0.00001228072,0.00091236026,0.49488953,0.00010414608,0.00025739655,0.4042986,0.041674,0.039131876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012654458,0.000059523394,0.03348485,0.0008647019,0.000015453328,0.0003025866,0.60864806,0.0002009664,0.00063256396,0.015932908,0.33979315,0.00005255161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05426042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093234345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94573957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074913125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049524507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107889175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053159362","doi":"10.1558/aleth.v4i2.42","title":"Theorising Tension and Ambivalence in Criminal Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alethia","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Tension (geology); Criminal law; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Physics; Classical mechanics","score_opus":0.0272654897724392,"score_gpt":0.313741407470736,"score_spread":0.2864759176982968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053159362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35206282,0.0031618713,0.02403968,0.08288163,0.00046203277,0.000061858926,0.000053294207,0.00004305167,0.53723377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997162,0.00023341022,0.00065259804,0.0006622084,0.000037173686,0.000029370092,0.00000672357,0.000010947581,0.0012054825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98721564,0.009118286,0.00028939603,0.0008887316,0.0011915873,0.0012963758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837911,0.011286294,0.0015057916,0.0012762692,0.0011213275,0.0010192175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012156591,0.00055646774,0.0007185277,0.0044224006,0.013332202,0.013849184,0.00268567,0.005833002,0.004125937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025657687,0.00070673355,0.0006413302,0.0037309686,0.08097474,0.02085904,0.0140612535,0.009551926,0.0002838068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007642262,0.000017438544,0.00043312326,0.000014426348,0.000004164213,0.00006583209,0.03512403,0.000090444744,0.000028043414,0.96249765,0.0003106713,0.0014064544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008467317,0.000008370026,0.00031588614,0.000054656513,0.000005575299,0.00006449829,0.026499232,0.00027821955,0.00003681723,0.96780306,0.0049181953,0.0000070273277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020432896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020794768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013849184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006604922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035069364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06429094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053262837","doi":"10.1080/14797580109367243","title":"Pedagogical law and abject rage in post‐trauma society","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cultural Values","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Canadian Historical Association","funders":"","keywords":"Bracketing (phenomenology); Sociology; Normative; Rage (emotion); Solidarity; Event (particle physics); Dictatorship; The Imaginary; Law; Politics; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09485759485669469,"score_gpt":0.3785842734521564,"score_spread":0.2837266785954617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053262837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5458535,0.004793468,0.010153032,0.073746756,0.00076110713,0.000119133845,0.000026451838,0.00015506806,0.36439145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99559253,0.0004437412,0.00019939408,0.0006198252,0.000055355013,0.000018088114,0.0000028997783,0.000010799361,0.0030574447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895808,0.007392945,0.00018564831,0.00043068678,0.0009430329,0.0014669215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920575,0.003939671,0.0014231281,0.0006740169,0.0007129932,0.0011926341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067256233,0.00033701173,0.00040186432,0.0025850441,0.016622141,0.014077593,0.0015078455,0.004105626,0.0050516007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016575385,0.00034101648,0.0002639133,0.0013903434,0.08864212,0.00798407,0.013999459,0.0065333634,0.00034360893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010183558,0.00007502668,0.0016729056,0.00004006375,0.0000056293893,0.0010910182,0.3996744,0.00013235035,0.00015016251,0.58821267,0.0017072833,0.0072283344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016682276,0.00009846086,0.003350646,0.0002849337,0.000009709086,0.0013666372,0.6421335,0.0004337661,0.00045557984,0.25048253,0.10133266,0.00003499919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005847903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006125416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016622141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00846942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059923236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061450243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053683773","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102811-173900","title":"Law's Archive","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Legal history; Subject (documents); Sovereignty; Critical legal studies; Power (physics); Politics; History; Comparative law; Political science; Legal realism","score_opus":0.021700796354050145,"score_gpt":0.3520814148400247,"score_spread":0.33038061848597455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053683773","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025826765,0.010094162,0.006742029,0.053997155,0.0066625574,0.000086917964,0.0007638484,0.0008490139,0.9182216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18888098,0.016736284,0.007784313,0.042371314,0.009640612,0.0003352404,0.0016753055,0.0017489685,0.73082703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99366117,0.0017818011,0.0005060299,0.0009046226,0.0025150257,0.0006313802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98560625,0.0058585634,0.0008527058,0.0038879486,0.0027983168,0.0009962075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066315215,0.0004155663,0.0005561405,0.0041416767,0.007838477,0.023083048,0.0029427456,0.006536338,0.060341045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025186801,0.0004488236,0.00053459016,0.0033983092,0.011498302,0.018401708,0.008113192,0.007237206,0.013015063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007579381,0.0000123065865,0.00010439251,0.00008180379,0.0000036133674,0.00010792241,0.004835707,0.000040894498,0.0000664473,0.8315806,0.13673164,0.026427092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024317912,0.0000064452684,0.000111753376,0.00019669542,0.000001857211,0.000095416326,0.0010488202,0.000035617362,0.00008816021,0.03480973,0.963596,0.000006978634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006493235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00886519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060341045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007978607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01148853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2018609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054056438","doi":"10.1080/13534640903478841","title":"Biopolitics and the Homonormative Subject; Epistemic Values and Epistemologies of the Eye; Individualization and the Play of Memories","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Parallax","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Michel foucault; Biopower; Politics; Subjectivity; Power (physics); Art history; Sociology; Subject (documents); Panopticon; Religious studies; Philosophy; Humanities; Aesthetics; Art; Law; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.009408609522802302,"score_gpt":0.27511327724555074,"score_spread":0.2657046677227484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054056438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013798197,0.099419236,0.02343644,0.07180569,0.0013417879,0.00005256589,0.00015321863,0.00014797402,0.78984475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89288515,0.026279032,0.0066419994,0.0045174533,0.001624877,0.00020811458,0.00008370202,0.000226574,0.067533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971355,0.0020095478,0.000053585685,0.00030281447,0.00034158124,0.00015690476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99698216,0.002093055,0.0002522825,0.00032996855,0.00020764784,0.00013491558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003620992,0.0008233194,0.00044472766,0.0019580147,0.005573989,0.010430724,0.0013640515,0.0033583816,0.01054401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055719325,0.00031633224,0.00028827038,0.0018572914,0.06374194,0.014252313,0.004058524,0.0035227826,0.0014951797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011856715,0.0000057655325,0.000047965277,0.00004514971,0.000002111237,0.000048679703,0.017555507,0.000035648543,0.00005810506,0.96690947,0.010012662,0.005267122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011217427,0.00001376367,0.0002667591,0.00037665822,0.000003384807,0.0001752052,0.016830146,0.00015013803,0.0001826125,0.80669034,0.17528385,0.00001595708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004180326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053114924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01054401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039751856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019400868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035273194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054515215","doi":"10.1177/0270467609355050","title":"Human Autonomy, Law, and Technology","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin of Science Technology & Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Technological determinism; Determinism; Emerging technologies; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Law; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.007456839187574234,"score_gpt":0.2719570361510838,"score_spread":0.26450019696350957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054515215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029559793,0.032369398,0.021015039,0.14527044,0.0011768397,0.000065427914,0.000071987524,0.00009211666,0.7703789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340525,0.012454067,0.004861334,0.013403783,0.0013593992,0.00014423464,0.000052580748,0.00005064097,0.03362143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930193,0.003891234,0.00021853973,0.00077429466,0.0013757134,0.0007209952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924664,0.005181879,0.0005155831,0.0006542249,0.00058328116,0.0005985711],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006002449,0.00030484018,0.0005220372,0.0014718341,0.005072225,0.0076603955,0.00092415395,0.0038964287,0.003640889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009057489,0.00022939908,0.00036163678,0.0011315887,0.05780205,0.008391123,0.004677068,0.004585089,0.0006554111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027840351,0.000005385332,0.000105238825,0.000015755419,0.0000015620583,0.000021880433,0.0017932989,0.00009621736,0.00002439014,0.9919499,0.0020829965,0.003900525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066123666,0.0000095274845,0.0003281323,0.00010333287,0.00000229455,0.000043642245,0.0012645283,0.0001780404,0.000058903468,0.91872,0.07927504,0.000010088311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048362855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002610705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99492776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052123517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056398306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03781843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056843305","doi":"10.24908/eoe-ese-rse.v7i0.602","title":"An Interpretive Response to \"Protecting History, Resisting Legibility: Voice and Defiance in Making Art\"","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legibility; Aesthetics; Sociology; Art; History; Visual arts","score_opus":0.02018850374603815,"score_gpt":0.31653679189467515,"score_spread":0.296348288148637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056843305","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00079762185,0.0017381386,0.00082558073,0.9770945,0.012424238,0.000016168024,0.000042899115,0.000045734294,0.0070151845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031944443,0.0014444692,0.0009026775,0.9262611,0.021410823,0.0001308831,0.000028284405,0.00016622718,0.017711144],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97166055,0.017611302,0.0012547572,0.0021543724,0.005226351,0.0020926257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9496252,0.038382247,0.0028023117,0.0016829624,0.0056051686,0.0019021756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021219928,0.00292479,0.0016870197,0.0020214673,0.023074266,0.017221209,0.0075258203,0.058607746,0.005781329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05054414,0.0012915634,0.0019868105,0.0021825794,0.06304548,0.014333573,0.008161245,0.07341273,0.00140111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005717858,0.000021851569,0.00017394422,0.00014604068,0.000014309332,0.00052166125,0.035036948,0.00013069746,0.0002762856,0.14870815,0.81267464,0.0022383328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000452435,0.000052107887,0.00077892427,0.0010910295,0.000032823158,0.00057772617,0.0463026,0.0005527579,0.0007764648,0.0500807,0.899567,0.00014260353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03436008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049093142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058607746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0137511715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010184274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11222303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057113611","doi":"10.7202/045084ar","title":"Privacy and Private Law: The Dilemma of Justification","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Autonomy; Harm; Tort; Political science; Value (mathematics); Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Jurisprudence; Law; Identity (music); Sociology; Computer science; Liability; Epistemology","score_opus":0.023014139752591506,"score_gpt":0.28863128334764304,"score_spread":0.2656171435950515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057113611","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034333397,0.011900693,0.13175443,0.5308238,0.0012106058,0.000107905675,0.00008421048,0.000112994276,0.28967193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484172,0.0031993373,0.017811688,0.01851477,0.0018264364,0.00026398135,0.000041309617,0.000072991264,0.009852173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96075284,0.026740286,0.0011827343,0.0023946338,0.006907916,0.0020214852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96422744,0.028970737,0.0012404105,0.0028595456,0.0019819057,0.00072001695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024893796,0.00060152396,0.0012067575,0.0024311047,0.009247292,0.015335942,0.00262437,0.020246858,0.0030058345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040676408,0.0006791661,0.0012011261,0.0019310004,0.087078914,0.021759948,0.008534419,0.012901779,0.00061890157],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016932927,0.0000029801,0.000017360113,0.000006352068,9.758971e-7,0.000013167076,0.0004313065,0.000049556344,0.000012758717,0.9981002,0.0004082321,0.00095532014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008876377,0.0000036172605,0.000023124794,0.000041076884,0.000001730373,0.00002342909,0.00033501332,0.00022213515,0.00003813085,0.9905032,0.008795172,0.0000045915103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041220067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024785672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024893796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010092445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011557403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13165253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060378585","doi":"10.1177/1743872109102492","title":"Time's Desire: Literature and the Temporality of Justice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Rhetorical question; Economic Justice; Torture; Spectacle; Aesthetics; Restorative justice; Sociology; Amnesty; Dream; Sacrifice; Punishment (psychology); Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Literature; Political science; Criminology; Art; Social psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.02082696592113149,"score_gpt":0.2618990157571885,"score_spread":0.241072049836057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060378585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03739159,0.069701806,0.012842666,0.11021648,0.0023268387,0.00001804349,0.000064875494,0.000045957484,0.7673917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95792735,0.015956845,0.0010197369,0.0057345214,0.0013366838,0.00004435935,0.000022861515,0.00006932603,0.017888306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950374,0.0032255922,0.00015017737,0.00050796283,0.0006763878,0.00040247387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994443,0.0039073033,0.0005076001,0.00041399215,0.00040654058,0.00032155606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004966798,0.00044044314,0.00047619507,0.0025464296,0.009755045,0.013841794,0.0017385822,0.004520524,0.004087237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008971198,0.00030640283,0.00045426763,0.0031432034,0.053919014,0.02121152,0.0052474216,0.0055499407,0.00045221043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033989809,0.000003045467,0.000032412383,0.000016910784,0.0000012049841,0.000025873365,0.008932987,0.000026883012,0.000014155129,0.9886923,0.00091239245,0.0013384003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011373676,0.000014130356,0.00018526053,0.00039284735,0.0000068509835,0.00011804244,0.023268366,0.0001426495,0.00010993075,0.80338293,0.1723531,0.000014438545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070671844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006411319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013841794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010491784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004966197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076123595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061873710","doi":"10.7202/042385ar","title":"Les réactions de la doctrine à la création du droit par les juges en droit administratif","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Law; Political science; Public law; Ideal (ethics); State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.007445172133935929,"score_gpt":0.274955771501615,"score_spread":0.26751059936767907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061873710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6038217,0.0051241517,0.0023441815,0.07661752,0.00050588854,0.000057900404,0.00010209454,0.000048097943,0.31137845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97682345,0.0013316843,0.00027714283,0.0022046394,0.000057796264,0.000010043409,0.00001443466,0.000017039843,0.01926388],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98842174,0.0038291872,0.000193213,0.0005904676,0.005333116,0.0016322626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836574,0.0071360655,0.0017610146,0.00041267148,0.005475441,0.0015573783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010901073,0.0003394202,0.00030632163,0.001779694,0.017371513,0.012951756,0.0011471512,0.0029879273,0.003951389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023686085,0.0002857829,0.00034280127,0.0018127295,0.028018424,0.0026724061,0.0023626608,0.0067120674,0.00034638584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084881176,0.0000451572,0.019882586,0.00012075731,0.000025778429,0.0012482576,0.5744461,0.0006181928,0.0019911272,0.35205123,0.017321603,0.03216439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025336656,0.000062443556,0.040149428,0.0003614044,0.000032223266,0.00037707342,0.5441166,0.0006133705,0.0014488997,0.017489033,0.3951857,0.00013840332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87934166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91303176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87934166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0733944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036832843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5325161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063487727","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-4469.2008.00127.x","title":"The Ethic of Diversity: Local Law and the Negotiation of Urban Norms","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Diversity (politics); Ethnocentrism; Normative; Sociology; Law; Tribunal; Subject (documents); Power (physics); Pride; Political science","score_opus":0.05436101600220011,"score_gpt":0.29931127777811356,"score_spread":0.24495026177591345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063487727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50832385,0.002907503,0.013829953,0.040985405,0.00011230474,0.00006793391,0.000070030095,0.00005435433,0.43364874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794966,0.00015220497,0.0002588728,0.00012454101,0.00000867057,0.000008439569,0.0000039420574,0.000003896554,0.0014897415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99450433,0.003874234,0.0001064173,0.00027485943,0.0006304105,0.0006098011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916469,0.00474433,0.0011815395,0.0005551489,0.00088290154,0.0009890738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054666093,0.00016890785,0.00024789944,0.001203353,0.010355385,0.009028778,0.0011545967,0.0015398815,0.0027356318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011354325,0.00023049176,0.000121532976,0.001350621,0.052762333,0.0036014994,0.0037482188,0.001283094,0.00015443213],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021845786,0.000014498254,0.0052442867,0.00004456748,0.000008450332,0.00019087526,0.09783775,0.0009270984,0.00021728258,0.88426954,0.002343322,0.00888047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059243423,0.000072391675,0.032975208,0.00043356835,0.000041892938,0.00020089422,0.28587383,0.006055934,0.00066857506,0.5504828,0.12304345,0.000092277514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26285696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38974747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26285696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031475395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012887753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52265394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065961265","doi":"10.1068/d412","title":"Anxious Reconciliation(s): Unsettling Foundations and Spatializing History","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning D Society and Space","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Politics; Context (archaeology); Teleology; Assertion; Colonialism; State (computer science); Mythology; Political history; Sociology; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.02589564916683172,"score_gpt":0.24829385671779608,"score_spread":0.22239820755096437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065961265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0922196,0.0041994518,0.08913764,0.044562384,0.00040892194,0.00015215173,0.000080724065,0.00036643413,0.7688728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98146033,0.00053100864,0.0056145503,0.0007599964,0.0000525216,0.000037488026,0.0000284166,0.00007886013,0.011436779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993302,0.0032015746,0.00020344545,0.0010744656,0.0010698378,0.0011487167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934535,0.0022613094,0.0006054749,0.0018510824,0.001378978,0.00044964234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008708111,0.00045404144,0.00048435736,0.0031981098,0.015165273,0.013318987,0.0028666598,0.0028300835,0.0068448116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018063528,0.00036793418,0.0004499618,0.0023057866,0.11263343,0.012867732,0.013033733,0.003558349,0.00044900223],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037196562,0.0000025702407,0.00020601967,0.000012246038,0.0000021639673,0.000047177826,0.009202065,0.00026455565,0.000048635506,0.9836429,0.00045793172,0.006110035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000829967,0.000015932836,0.0007054602,0.0001025843,0.000009843365,0.00009822262,0.01925124,0.0010210668,0.00035254934,0.89982224,0.07858888,0.000023555247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12672134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13046749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12672134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022391347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026904777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25196743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066806600","doi":"10.1353/jwl.2006.0005","title":"Les femmes juges feront-elles veritablement une difference? Reflexions sur leur presence depuis vingt ans a la Cour supreme du Canada","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03423380441760103,"score_gpt":0.2629472056405966,"score_spread":0.22871340122299555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066806600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7892523,0.0053933356,0.0003736886,0.08615124,0.00044850158,0.000027985834,0.00031578756,0.000013407172,0.11802378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96776587,0.0017508746,0.00008629201,0.0047184257,0.000049301805,0.000007347892,0.00003810431,0.00000812466,0.025575796],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976299,0.00032425116,0.00002737708,0.00021436458,0.0005878086,0.0012162812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668604,0.0007038319,0.00035485267,0.00006590079,0.0012128532,0.0009765007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019462096,0.00015049335,0.00027695973,0.0010308571,0.016923796,0.0046275277,0.0007105116,0.0011784267,0.0054573514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005795983,0.00017372295,0.00014611732,0.0017601757,0.007323666,0.0013448027,0.0013427999,0.0027325856,0.00027042528],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015430913,0.00006407973,0.19307537,0.00017117122,0.00006639906,0.0013080712,0.42972675,0.00022460904,0.0019454559,0.18095799,0.08510918,0.10719658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009960099,0.000040172516,0.26733187,0.00046279535,0.000052525316,0.00021112282,0.39808694,0.00019895508,0.00080042146,0.004490859,0.3282174,0.000097089505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9580296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.986813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041970372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027357755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033582307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19849533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067092773","doi":"10.7202/043083ar","title":"Publicity exploitation of celebrities: protection of a star's style in Quebec civil law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Publicity; Appropriation; Law; Intellectual property; Political science; Advertising; Sociology; Art; Business; Visual arts; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.011770345734376438,"score_gpt":0.2384384153739828,"score_spread":0.22666806963960637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067092773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52806926,0.00212009,0.0015833783,0.041270074,0.00014196865,0.00005961917,0.000093365656,0.0000396815,0.4266226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732295,0.00039758324,0.0003304383,0.0024148056,0.000021449385,0.000014316552,0.000012507618,0.0000057116677,0.02357356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980204,0.0005650865,0.000046922185,0.00014938031,0.0005868208,0.00063143804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947635,0.0025050642,0.0004852259,0.00033525284,0.0012937457,0.0006171889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027250913,0.00018479672,0.00017701836,0.00073041045,0.014117948,0.006674443,0.0011232477,0.003400356,0.005174241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065391655,0.00021629973,0.00017791266,0.0010361213,0.013010573,0.0017093893,0.0023472793,0.002903779,0.00023988234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007886203,0.00014305313,0.02907739,0.00012467943,0.00001917971,0.0029684906,0.25802907,0.00047089212,0.0026821468,0.6028449,0.030826172,0.072735175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004219921,0.00018285628,0.119135655,0.00076256343,0.000074966025,0.001839941,0.24663822,0.0025260905,0.0026610214,0.032009546,0.5939018,0.000225056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9190103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9679349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08098972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025328143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024411844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1837694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067349740","doi":"10.1111/lest.12086","title":"Stanley Fish on Philosophy, Politics and Law, by Michael Robertson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, vii + 355pp (£60 hardback). ISBN: 9781107074743.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Media studies; Political science; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.031293583026202006,"score_gpt":0.271008895156151,"score_spread":0.239715312129949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067349740","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015333375,0.9503041,0.0007744166,0.021907063,0.0034994937,0.000015474912,0.00025095814,0.00008670681,0.023008442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0067901774,0.7941976,0.0021971555,0.0054272898,0.0040376815,0.00007498593,0.00048071798,0.00023187694,0.18656254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992275,0.00019339296,0.00007233717,0.00012364265,0.00032488166,0.000058351263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987501,0.00064047,0.00012857438,0.00007079213,0.00028169813,0.00012835875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019067355,0.0021826033,0.0011983961,0.004518619,0.0013271696,0.0036540003,0.0014531147,0.002956245,0.049237803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038846277,0.0014227796,0.0006271507,0.0056425,0.0026429635,0.009031833,0.0019921474,0.0032348838,0.026564585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022274995,0.000010546174,0.00007816787,0.00049620226,0.000009561489,0.00003453607,0.00031762323,0.00012998398,0.000097898905,0.011410656,0.91978586,0.06760664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070846418,0.000006589445,0.0005052512,0.0009866322,0.0000049490714,0.00011329937,0.00028472542,0.000055392386,0.00006604876,0.012534986,0.9854254,0.000009556695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017547159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037512835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049237803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033869587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003937793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16471684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068412615","doi":"10.2307/1262365","title":": <i>Theaters of Intention: Drama and the Law in Early Modern England</i>","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Drama; Media studies; History; Art; Sociology; Literature","score_opus":0.014777969023002548,"score_gpt":0.24015551086832043,"score_spread":0.22537754184531789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068412615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17581359,0.023882525,0.0018130466,0.18316646,0.0025024733,0.00004029238,0.00063690793,0.000114670285,0.61203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8940077,0.0031684395,0.00025010444,0.0037598044,0.00042204018,0.000023508526,0.000099834426,0.000052375213,0.098216206],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995436,0.00026875307,0.000015573387,0.0000332891,0.00006245708,0.00007630255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911875,0.0004938287,0.00011177502,0.000057468522,0.000094463656,0.00012375317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011788814,0.00019724236,0.00014057217,0.00060076365,0.0045805364,0.004819483,0.0004938977,0.0014190543,0.018149475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030187804,0.00016150082,0.00012972047,0.0008670445,0.0074106003,0.0039899545,0.0019859504,0.0023128937,0.0014675781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006432998,0.000031774904,0.0023628208,0.00032584698,0.000007946999,0.00031138412,0.41023082,0.00008137385,0.0003628557,0.33024848,0.23509975,0.020872613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015761467,0.00004169399,0.018802494,0.00060154806,0.0000132157,0.00040493996,0.22777906,0.00011970578,0.0005837525,0.01903019,0.73257715,0.000030511395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035150982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.090717115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035150982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032531284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012903456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069892764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068469566","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100008942","title":"La critique perelmanienne de la théorie pure du droit: Essai de synthèse","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Relation (database); Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Power (physics); Sociology; Political science; Mathematics; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.006077648689252718,"score_gpt":0.24927264860579587,"score_spread":0.24319499991654314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068469566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007966802,0.16626997,0.054355625,0.3227017,0.010526504,0.00006246926,0.00032470343,0.00023000212,0.43756223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6865759,0.14321548,0.026817884,0.04821589,0.027687943,0.00058565196,0.00044179618,0.0008149188,0.06564456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98897904,0.0061280555,0.00035002374,0.0011340271,0.0029860646,0.00042278742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760927,0.019393701,0.0006169324,0.0014432931,0.002211004,0.00024229356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013448005,0.0014607775,0.0016982971,0.010906077,0.0039342297,0.014867915,0.002805012,0.0062487433,0.007770309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021232272,0.0007235973,0.0011821273,0.0076890774,0.044274192,0.02288068,0.004716448,0.010709393,0.0014576446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024844862,0.0000047435274,0.000011753764,0.000075552765,0.00000482403,0.000012570516,0.0013978475,0.00008034844,0.00001325477,0.9908379,0.0051865038,0.002372264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010119288,0.00000700575,0.000086157284,0.0009857621,0.000011156723,0.00004270007,0.0015400448,0.0005249364,0.00012348715,0.7689651,0.2276915,0.00001209322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011786349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067127566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017154602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017154602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008485949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12446594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069330396","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100009790","title":"Indocile Bodies: Gender Identity and Strip Searches in Canadian Criminal Law","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Essentialism; Identity (music); Normative; Ethnology; Political science; Sociology; Power (physics); Law; Gender studies; Art","score_opus":0.04364627035260328,"score_gpt":0.30172445804462283,"score_spread":0.25807818769201957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069330396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9078412,0.0010552468,0.00018775898,0.0050875754,0.000043534517,0.00006704535,0.0005475927,0.0000073611423,0.0851627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99169207,0.0006217502,0.000077202996,0.00022755757,0.000008733078,0.0000142687295,0.00016090454,0.000006038822,0.0071915276],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704117,0.00027111018,0.00008685662,0.00017856152,0.0012512166,0.0011710167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994457,0.0012702476,0.0012149513,0.00020333793,0.0016272798,0.0012270245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021648174,0.000274162,0.00038230978,0.0056401673,0.011708538,0.0053777914,0.0018005171,0.0013063363,0.014365711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015125301,0.00028987828,0.00027484927,0.0073644626,0.007958794,0.0025248658,0.0038110095,0.0019509428,0.0004609386],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013978468,0.00021498975,0.5802422,0.00012312953,0.00002296383,0.00058879226,0.23494054,0.00030925195,0.0003441654,0.11216598,0.009836811,0.061071385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011174528,0.000030659565,0.72066045,0.00023132672,0.000024965897,0.000184046,0.24191344,0.00048384114,0.00013947494,0.0058374517,0.030436853,0.000046302597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98457897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.990159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04147552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04147552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048366413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30092734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071398162","doi":"10.1525/tph.2015.37.1.88","title":"Documentary Evidence and the Construction of Narratives in Legal and Historical Contexts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Public Historian","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Witness; Context (archaeology); Legitimacy; Space (punctuation); Value (mathematics); Expert witness; History; Sociology; Political science; Law; Literature; Linguistics; Computer science; Art; Archaeology","score_opus":0.037643216480938976,"score_gpt":0.2837970830500548,"score_spread":0.2461538665691158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071398162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47443157,0.013394282,0.034244478,0.059462495,0.0007209804,0.00032821955,0.0003103108,0.0001335892,0.41697395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856478,0.0017103568,0.004820599,0.00039276766,0.000050101808,0.000076497534,0.00006652265,0.00003998546,0.0071953177],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9780084,0.017388627,0.00061418675,0.00088782905,0.0017924389,0.0013085406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95480007,0.035300028,0.003245394,0.0024163302,0.0026405782,0.0015976543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021019034,0.00084709906,0.00050831056,0.0073082866,0.02396488,0.025255779,0.0038540086,0.0032013922,0.005080763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04131945,0.0007818402,0.00042321428,0.005699918,0.09183583,0.017076967,0.013989394,0.004433521,0.00033881838],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011633297,0.000006543948,0.00072053453,0.000071626084,0.0000056356544,0.0007245629,0.7704457,0.00011571815,0.00015450134,0.22166044,0.0006441529,0.005438904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010083077,0.000018613373,0.0012411443,0.0007686838,0.000017432398,0.00042759714,0.7999306,0.00028202203,0.000504271,0.077561446,0.11919943,0.000038617236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10675641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1397225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10675641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021282043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021745447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21227008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072611680","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9337.2007.00381.x","title":"The Regular Practice of Morality in Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Positivism; Morality; Epistemology; Law; Legal positivism; Philosophy; Philosophy of law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.02336370591314746,"score_gpt":0.31748462683176754,"score_spread":0.2941209209186201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072611680","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044644866,0.009115442,0.09487174,0.14447242,0.0017834101,0.000070044654,0.000059648006,0.00022329649,0.7047591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773431,0.0013028443,0.0068727783,0.002669406,0.00082541246,0.00005890892,0.000014523581,0.00009907325,0.010813997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96345764,0.02639425,0.0009376451,0.002957288,0.0052796816,0.0009734389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541353,0.028877044,0.0033662308,0.008044809,0.0045227697,0.0010538977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024374867,0.00032709778,0.00056095666,0.0020889621,0.005564131,0.011453589,0.0015900598,0.0038866785,0.0050753662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046138547,0.00044733612,0.00047996975,0.0018080858,0.08532817,0.010009959,0.005146328,0.007566495,0.0009550842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029583578,0.0000044234876,0.00010750891,0.000015385178,0.00000259465,0.000013421495,0.0016672193,0.000058847578,0.000046062647,0.99399734,0.0010850349,0.0029992152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008911885,0.000009972446,0.0002015061,0.00011863625,0.0000035864905,0.000037792037,0.0008473827,0.00036599074,0.00013310181,0.9527549,0.045511175,0.0000069856583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020751988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014001603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024374867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053183315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004558002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12890822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072778080","doi":"10.1300/j076v30n01_09","title":"Violence Against Gays and Lesbians","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Offender Rehabilitation","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; Okanagan College","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Criminology; Social psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.013963020787156362,"score_gpt":0.2844702336445829,"score_spread":0.2705072128574265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072778080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8479431,0.026905429,0.00022356304,0.01151415,0.00044589187,0.000054867058,0.00006419456,0.00001250494,0.11283633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9553302,0.018204065,0.0002241375,0.0056613414,0.00016734614,0.00002962993,0.000043934597,0.0000044350454,0.020334974],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990138,0.0006203315,0.000030245188,0.000034591627,0.00014152043,0.00015956779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995022,0.00008422849,0.00009979305,0.000022214703,0.000059454727,0.00023202246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009646037,0.00024081777,0.00024992283,0.000716216,0.004173222,0.0027183755,0.00017749262,0.0008235509,0.0033091027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019750635,0.00014548711,0.00018789379,0.00040935745,0.0013977913,0.00053307664,0.0021776843,0.00095098006,0.0005216077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022936317,0.0005475514,0.3451525,0.00065772055,0.0001316017,0.0038660862,0.29276505,0.00015010306,0.00268432,0.07061905,0.024560329,0.2586363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053313153,0.0006824487,0.2300485,0.0030869537,0.00011621044,0.0072895032,0.3833428,0.00021836151,0.0015439455,0.013209926,0.36035472,0.000053327803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013738198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03705798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013738198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005812775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001270677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027316451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077505633","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00277.x","title":"The People's Law versus Judge Judy Justice: Two Models of Law in American Reality-Based Courtroom TV","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Legal culture; Political science","score_opus":0.0416094702890638,"score_gpt":0.35707475638296543,"score_spread":0.3154652860939016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077505633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37433884,0.0036971539,0.014411371,0.037510887,0.00035462173,0.0000712016,0.000096171614,0.000047058238,0.56947273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945397,0.0006356654,0.0006214971,0.0008480924,0.00007565285,0.000038626615,0.00001785345,0.000014562809,0.0032083103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936359,0.004214227,0.00009193221,0.00041690265,0.0010587991,0.0005821927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926535,0.0050526923,0.0006030553,0.00040556586,0.00056318095,0.00072210695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035634434,0.0004545015,0.00039165572,0.0028614264,0.0056908857,0.014643722,0.001962414,0.0034845732,0.0052454383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008309108,0.0004970249,0.0004970903,0.0027669535,0.038829893,0.010278823,0.003487207,0.0043970537,0.00038636752],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026001413,0.00006889593,0.0014971081,0.000032497705,0.000007441478,0.000100944264,0.079390205,0.00020880143,0.00012727141,0.9126508,0.0012285033,0.0046615237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008526561,0.000138094,0.015469405,0.00045418495,0.00005318852,0.00030191912,0.34265813,0.0057903444,0.00043579825,0.55800885,0.07651316,0.00009168311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026055796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026167639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026055796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0105931545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027927707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07685912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078608990","doi":"10.1007/s11196-005-4101-1","title":"Canada as a Semiotic Society: Harold Innis, Roberta Kevelson, and the Bias of Legal Communications","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Politics; Law; Sociology; Work (physics); Legal history; Legal realism; Legal profession; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.02865080882152292,"score_gpt":0.32090862302900536,"score_spread":0.2922578142074824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078608990","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026725728,0.044015672,0.0026562295,0.67767453,0.00178065,0.000049883634,0.00025141455,0.000070261645,0.24677566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86423206,0.027324645,0.0027451576,0.02974583,0.0016838314,0.00010886059,0.00007001453,0.0002046348,0.07388506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951422,0.0020304208,0.00011743992,0.00038998446,0.0015328897,0.0007869613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98717624,0.006947549,0.0005581277,0.0004095051,0.003509156,0.0013994125],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058346093,0.00062732195,0.00064397126,0.0032528238,0.032003623,0.02297646,0.0026379144,0.007920641,0.005701862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015205821,0.00046783194,0.00024563915,0.0068113077,0.058824085,0.013844775,0.0043482264,0.0075383065,0.0005698167],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012559573,0.000010148128,0.00038274887,0.000029126817,0.00000405124,0.00006623301,0.027018199,0.00014737579,0.000022150969,0.9277297,0.038837943,0.0057397415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021353884,0.000009256214,0.0009438656,0.000288644,0.000019689762,0.00009143357,0.061905473,0.0005507922,0.00014733463,0.43115598,0.5047974,0.00006882576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9311653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9493147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96799636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065056466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11252837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4720199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079405932","doi":"10.1353/ren.2008.0833","title":": <i>Eternal Bonds, True Contracts: Law and Nature in Shakespeare’s Problem Plays</i>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Philosophy; Law and economics; Art history; Humanities; Law; Sociology; Art; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0075318404115349005,"score_gpt":0.2661200120741974,"score_spread":0.2585881716626625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079405932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015599747,0.027090788,0.007987797,0.42364445,0.0026309353,0.0000256128,0.00021964977,0.00006903004,0.522732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6604843,0.011231755,0.0036025739,0.041077077,0.0023559679,0.00008634695,0.00015682542,0.00015994949,0.28084522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998928,0.0006510927,0.000038809638,0.000115606446,0.00016363295,0.000102786915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856913,0.000980651,0.00010013172,0.000079984085,0.00017258628,0.000097477874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002049802,0.00046456765,0.00028489716,0.0008136825,0.006604709,0.006618035,0.000990324,0.005890957,0.012774694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004090398,0.00024024695,0.00023292746,0.0010815304,0.015133157,0.010470489,0.0017037522,0.0055919318,0.0017083187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009365003,0.0000046248583,0.00014170885,0.00003335279,0.000002331067,0.000059523354,0.011746654,0.00004641532,0.00002401191,0.8983013,0.086915515,0.0027151904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013651174,0.0000120860495,0.0012068831,0.000267755,0.000006428912,0.00034574384,0.018358247,0.0004085033,0.00022671797,0.48026007,0.49887145,0.000022501767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022880686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040406805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022880686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047570146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022120073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045494974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079901110","doi":"10.1353/jls.2006.0011","title":"Introduction : La culture dans le domaine du droit","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Ethnology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007123193557403237,"score_gpt":0.2281153986040155,"score_spread":0.22099220504661227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079901110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067430683,0.15811108,0.004594715,0.25129023,0.05330143,0.00007358526,0.001015114,0.00013385282,0.524737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1805158,0.12170955,0.0032091516,0.09031222,0.044441767,0.00020049777,0.00090687856,0.00054661423,0.5581576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998139,0.00092220755,0.00008218503,0.00032560315,0.00033336852,0.00019747304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998207,0.0011214287,0.00009678994,0.000092507544,0.0003058961,0.00017642944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010429542,0.00085062324,0.00037397066,0.0012220425,0.00433754,0.006348753,0.0010379179,0.003352053,0.034574762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025037762,0.00033478343,0.0006700608,0.0014469995,0.0052342564,0.0044823615,0.0024829686,0.0069234455,0.004934711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035583966,0.00002453111,0.0006739348,0.00033753976,0.000007505019,0.00019137097,0.010826586,0.00013475868,0.00029277173,0.47370106,0.4837311,0.030043334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021779258,0.000009657362,0.00085396785,0.00042952524,0.0000018924442,0.00008917774,0.0024597428,0.000045239387,0.000060666684,0.011086143,0.98495156,0.000010298745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024570977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022755355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034574762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004303391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002706542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115664124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080414298","doi":"10.1177/105756770001000116","title":"Book Review: Just Words: Constitutional Rights and Social Wrongs","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Criminal Justice Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.03715995170630051,"score_gpt":0.36357026661834857,"score_spread":0.3264103149120481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080414298","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000149053,0.7515464,0.0005652871,0.08313769,0.123679616,0.0000788278,0.00042169506,0.000086385044,0.04033507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029866367,0.6937391,0.000614195,0.068417035,0.113374665,0.00022337516,0.0006660539,0.00016960345,0.11980937],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982862,0.00041218218,0.00012492447,0.00016423594,0.00089693133,0.000115535906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922759,0.0041671954,0.0005341475,0.00024242562,0.0023787108,0.00040162972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017287469,0.0012241015,0.0030462649,0.0051581454,0.0011271418,0.0041435333,0.0016858862,0.0057700095,0.038652524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010927366,0.0006903352,0.0006209275,0.008129871,0.0022168537,0.0040876484,0.0016696912,0.0054346365,0.021269765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038256067,0.0000037391897,0.000012513703,0.00040172352,0.0000042783026,0.0000069840276,0.000008463789,0.000022813818,0.00001770715,0.0010377257,0.9834432,0.01503706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007691846,0.0000073624506,0.00014560057,0.0010514666,0.000011707208,0.000056660352,0.000020211524,0.000016775912,0.000015657553,0.0017609658,0.99690056,0.0000054453444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005569838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017864352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038652524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029228188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00532172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12930554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082195937","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-3658.2004.00049.x","title":"The boundaries of property: lessons from Beatrix Potter","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Individualism; Scholarship; Politics; Sociology; Boundary (topology); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010941927987131712,"score_gpt":0.2262670866070903,"score_spread":0.2153251586199586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082195937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072975986,0.06427632,0.008742565,0.26050985,0.0013134218,0.00006704506,0.00013327756,0.0001144908,0.5918671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90510184,0.027124116,0.0046324786,0.011319238,0.0003790895,0.00006339318,0.00006123891,0.00020926526,0.05110936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740356,0.0015318062,0.000057825444,0.00023733225,0.00042241195,0.0003469808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960163,0.0028651909,0.00013285225,0.00020615214,0.0003722298,0.00040721195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036213428,0.00050672045,0.00069552,0.0012460462,0.016536713,0.009817091,0.0018197291,0.0035080162,0.0059248144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008213339,0.00052372675,0.00028910767,0.0020422682,0.04569959,0.012686427,0.006173156,0.0068098437,0.0008124363],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028564065,0.000019241987,0.00044761022,0.00016741332,0.0000058624664,0.0009369491,0.24776727,0.00042518266,0.00010876695,0.6778324,0.04669431,0.025566498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014239028,0.000015504638,0.00070336607,0.00070370483,0.000006435709,0.00049480435,0.15490311,0.00024330085,0.00021263844,0.18467535,0.65799683,0.000030787498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3378559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43804252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66214406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020393245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011268703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67177874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086512123","doi":"10.1159/000255011","title":"Human Favus in Quebec","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dermatologica","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Dermatology","score_opus":0.022711486209226583,"score_gpt":0.3142538785606474,"score_spread":0.2915423923514208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086512123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8842788,0.0075893807,0.0005152904,0.010729758,0.00027566915,0.00014583238,0.0015102046,0.00007634817,0.09487875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9431162,0.0018898152,0.0002995536,0.0014661858,0.000029566629,0.000039285766,0.00020632597,0.000016234088,0.05293687],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934274,0.00012261704,0.000023440092,0.00006540636,0.00008548913,0.0003602359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999073,0.00013867869,0.0001171229,0.000030342293,0.00026252572,0.00037835224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046622148,0.00020604237,0.0003010107,0.0012398668,0.01090761,0.0019390547,0.00075992325,0.0010309874,0.017763767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011972825,0.00024166376,0.00034122914,0.0020098991,0.0017623814,0.0005747971,0.0013016404,0.0014947634,0.0005243466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040765462,0.0005248866,0.5529601,0.0007156053,0.00016897611,0.016999291,0.09530155,0.0012773141,0.0026305018,0.08437767,0.07463164,0.1700048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060425715,0.00015326048,0.67346096,0.0007758069,0.00006262994,0.003044335,0.08339573,0.0010179435,0.00041599615,0.0017992102,0.23572797,0.00008580579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9896857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043482818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043482818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03638203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31549138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086582420","doi":"10.1017/cls.2014.6","title":"Visual Legalities of Race and Reparations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.01438943921579737,"score_gpt":0.2820442450211938,"score_spread":0.2676548058053964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086582420","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43905225,0.0023861232,0.005225172,0.012726933,0.0001867757,0.000032437223,0.00010685696,0.00004715724,0.5402363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99444747,0.00028673626,0.00033575145,0.00014961374,0.00002033192,0.00000537752,0.000008787879,0.000011096014,0.0047347895],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765825,0.0013844084,0.0000429866,0.00014580242,0.00045998747,0.00030851865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960914,0.0018345453,0.00071195955,0.00040922116,0.0006998082,0.00025309285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021062763,0.00016509835,0.0001891003,0.0019459743,0.007654856,0.00707175,0.00077002053,0.00081087585,0.008121666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010438793,0.00015149398,0.00013459752,0.0014966526,0.023429815,0.0033729062,0.003928128,0.0014123349,0.00022517424],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050931503,0.000018193832,0.0041514966,0.000121210636,0.0000112253365,0.0005019587,0.48634055,0.0002291934,0.0017075022,0.47338638,0.003554531,0.029926728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009399803,0.000043788397,0.025303412,0.00051883725,0.000027984379,0.0006881216,0.6809411,0.00041948774,0.0013974108,0.09350631,0.19708692,0.000057336823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07742433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1154396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07742433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049357903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003240023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15394735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088317809","doi":"10.7202/015818ar","title":"Burke’s “Revolutionary Book”: Conservative Politics and Revolutionary Aesthetics in the Reflections","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Romanticism on the Net","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Aesthetics; Narrative; Value (mathematics); Literature; Articulation (sociology); Style (visual arts); Tragedy (event); Romance; Philosophy; History; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03460634682427368,"score_gpt":0.32433244255088856,"score_spread":0.2897260957266149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088317809","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051605325,0.029729053,0.006797166,0.103757,0.0035156014,0.00003345093,0.000093115574,0.00017342245,0.80429584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.730043,0.006193516,0.0020503683,0.010922461,0.00062235113,0.000037151065,0.000042986558,0.00020284035,0.24988529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832326,0.001121884,0.000022588873,0.000106140484,0.00027822854,0.0001478323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945,0.00027002906,0.00004310353,0.000064510255,0.000110984496,0.000061312385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009599613,0.00036946614,0.00018478827,0.0005475174,0.005786934,0.0046336288,0.00043283548,0.0017410384,0.0045319693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029045038,0.00016776836,0.0001492492,0.0004626179,0.007966256,0.0024387862,0.0014608603,0.0030484754,0.0010151743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048203852,0.000027111873,0.00031994193,0.00008280796,0.00000633062,0.00040751923,0.06534473,0.00016718639,0.0007660321,0.7726137,0.13574333,0.02447306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004745855,0.000011066914,0.0003657596,0.00012519443,0.0000026268983,0.00020894484,0.0127725545,0.00007517202,0.00048948335,0.024539143,0.9613953,0.000010039361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01294855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020673962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01294855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038950578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014380798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028260767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089329122","doi":"10.4000/communication.5171","title":"Porno-chic et indécence médiatique","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Communication","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.08543663449978804,"score_gpt":0.3641836034041844,"score_spread":0.2787469689043963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089329122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18169965,0.013759443,0.0060434826,0.035844408,0.0015504586,0.000096799464,0.000461008,0.00009866783,0.76044613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92565644,0.007356878,0.0012990169,0.0021225445,0.0010626368,0.00012973176,0.00012968155,0.000097885684,0.062145256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963063,0.0020768815,0.00012411723,0.00037684973,0.0007971802,0.000318686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926684,0.0043296376,0.0009606697,0.0007435468,0.0008717783,0.00042594914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003151258,0.00046708775,0.00041139862,0.0026146278,0.005459114,0.011432439,0.0006867658,0.0013515629,0.013900014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00984994,0.0002524126,0.00025840843,0.002956861,0.010756336,0.0057835495,0.0039634993,0.0025200383,0.0011521418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015180906,0.00007152607,0.01056402,0.0005930828,0.000030887066,0.0011084881,0.21743768,0.0001240388,0.0008615937,0.701074,0.010163234,0.057819616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029232571,0.00008916787,0.018970149,0.0008552376,0.00004784515,0.0012304023,0.13230008,0.00029864462,0.0009356868,0.035133023,0.8100684,0.000042099236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01001793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010789605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013900014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043628355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029348931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046500146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092353006","doi":"10.5840/symposium20026111","title":"The Phenomenology of Modern Legal Discourse","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Symposium","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenology (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.016170742590599703,"score_gpt":0.27598987658050517,"score_spread":0.25981913398990547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092353006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062416486,0.13201927,0.036447544,0.3763852,0.0034220691,0.00010651735,0.000351458,0.0001847046,0.3886667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94090897,0.02592466,0.0048506497,0.009094553,0.0020622332,0.0001718144,0.00008061847,0.00012059498,0.0167859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955188,0.0036924197,0.000070867645,0.00020489734,0.0002959438,0.00021707184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897746,0.008738774,0.00031661,0.0004572094,0.00034639935,0.0003664106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066876477,0.0005228641,0.00064417475,0.004010571,0.008971868,0.018670283,0.0014518407,0.0058773067,0.0059217317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009614019,0.00058272696,0.000517803,0.0051160757,0.07359136,0.021684142,0.003965546,0.006671828,0.00045881447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007086246,0.000008688595,0.00014231137,0.00007393318,0.0000033489405,0.00006148479,0.051186867,0.00007254212,0.00006773551,0.9423925,0.0036144338,0.0023690464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013020048,0.000012632769,0.00037108516,0.00042870588,0.0000059831677,0.00014570398,0.06688342,0.00024553607,0.00007383306,0.7955177,0.13628772,0.00001473392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005938105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055095847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018670283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007918027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005258238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05744958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093319022","doi":"10.7202/1005563ar","title":"Arnaud Lucien, La justice mise en scène. Approche communicationnelle de l’institution judiciaire, Paris, L’Harmattan, 2008, 295 p., ISBN 978-2-296-06634-2.","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.019855321912383865,"score_gpt":0.2576208275868267,"score_spread":0.23776550567444282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093319022","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033539976,0.84217846,0.0009798285,0.08915253,0.005018535,0.000022974587,0.00028695483,0.00010449958,0.06192078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024536122,0.70753473,0.002831965,0.023970934,0.0052688182,0.00013830744,0.00040103338,0.0003036692,0.23501442],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970559,0.0011209028,0.00015829824,0.00031540444,0.001093542,0.00025602223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766684,0.0012814612,0.0002171234,0.00006289061,0.0005972565,0.00017443942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025475114,0.0020922858,0.00081794214,0.0025978768,0.0041580973,0.005868707,0.002243773,0.0076053077,0.03433326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00422666,0.0008929345,0.0006077845,0.003450917,0.0031363382,0.009957916,0.0019145192,0.006480635,0.019887442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028555938,0.000014553891,0.00015565926,0.00047433213,0.000010087985,0.00008348249,0.0017807373,0.0000928536,0.00007503975,0.02764633,0.9232699,0.04636848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070489536,0.000005952878,0.0012785553,0.00074243336,0.0000056165936,0.00013053091,0.0011855412,0.000051889823,0.00008783603,0.008758885,0.9877236,0.000022013564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10934979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14890113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10934979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009988002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072618225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2174266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093515167","doi":"10.7202/1017520ar","title":"The Challenge of the Bad Man","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Criminal law; Discretion; Order (exchange); Law; Criminal justice; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.01997373043437266,"score_gpt":0.266053838732667,"score_spread":0.24608010829829435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093515167","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029606936,0.007914061,0.006770081,0.77146995,0.002777641,0.000016616561,0.000035918583,0.000059157977,0.18134964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86263627,0.002430365,0.0020170696,0.087835036,0.001306719,0.00003042205,0.000017526918,0.00006963384,0.043656986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99293375,0.004269088,0.00011965579,0.0007673169,0.0010819628,0.000828184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99294347,0.003020995,0.00044139626,0.0007690442,0.0011060515,0.0017189907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005879834,0.00032431554,0.0005232956,0.00074504106,0.014873665,0.009145562,0.0009587572,0.005142972,0.0050514666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01023787,0.0002989424,0.0002909251,0.0004179179,0.047132477,0.00871676,0.004895939,0.010126224,0.00089791283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015416073,0.000014536995,0.00059137883,0.000022702925,0.000004593534,0.0000899435,0.00830412,0.00011347675,0.000070785696,0.9247124,0.05615209,0.00990864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008751187,0.000021837726,0.00058144087,0.00008835124,0.0000047143644,0.00017433938,0.012717333,0.00031998864,0.00015778259,0.67948693,0.30641642,0.000022125905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014419152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01877144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014873665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062923343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073881475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045654237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093639882","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2014.17.1.103","title":"Capacity to Consent to Sexual Risk","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Context (archaeology); Unconscious mind; Law; Morality; Sexual attraction; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Social psychology; Human sexuality","score_opus":0.093634822695311,"score_gpt":0.3606355353221883,"score_spread":0.2670007126268773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093639882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04158654,0.0031234298,0.07461486,0.112841055,0.0008278854,0.0005452085,0.00034378492,0.0001900713,0.7659272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92454374,0.001753996,0.017261118,0.024522476,0.0007299391,0.00088743144,0.0002808897,0.0001070659,0.029913306],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9694278,0.013194297,0.002681291,0.004553209,0.007275799,0.0028674926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9452502,0.030745147,0.004521611,0.009875366,0.0069516646,0.0026560198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04026672,0.00062001176,0.00090409385,0.0017865313,0.004571286,0.01067382,0.0031374756,0.009957343,0.010113876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07914603,0.00078058575,0.0013884282,0.000794774,0.045860067,0.011474123,0.012194035,0.010538047,0.0023395927],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013384108,0.000025324176,0.0009963918,0.00005100951,0.000011291377,0.00012693246,0.005004571,0.00024793128,0.00036930625,0.9823775,0.0020439075,0.008732447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003514966,0.0000611431,0.0011214222,0.000421429,0.000023060285,0.00051125657,0.0015396926,0.0005306846,0.0007665057,0.90781564,0.087093435,0.000080630125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005609723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035974786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04026672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004408644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016505297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21295333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094373076","doi":"10.1163/15718115-01904001","title":"Symbolic Equality: Law and National Symbols in Northern Ireland","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal on Minority and Group Rights","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Northern ireland; The Symbolic; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Ethnology","score_opus":0.022770659539064687,"score_gpt":0.3165148945452844,"score_spread":0.2937442350062197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094373076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23541734,0.00329135,0.0015263197,0.026571415,0.00032795174,0.00006248584,0.00004929638,0.000048888225,0.7327049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9570963,0.0006146355,0.0004217386,0.0024615144,0.000049514467,0.000039964038,0.00001930037,0.000017899205,0.03927911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898419,0.003312078,0.0005841656,0.00085355126,0.0024818007,0.0029264663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99454886,0.0027256338,0.0008711051,0.00043644093,0.00071759813,0.00070038496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005687352,0.00017718015,0.0005081781,0.0011248689,0.009234369,0.017640274,0.0022330265,0.003337657,0.0054017506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013086085,0.00036434995,0.0003375666,0.0014355335,0.032419596,0.005298162,0.013110027,0.00432782,0.0005466265],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052387382,0.00007653144,0.00536985,0.00019774205,0.000011372998,0.0017078398,0.10456331,0.00052400597,0.00043052537,0.8388376,0.008838252,0.039390575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046766647,0.00016030805,0.03125461,0.0011548214,0.00003343183,0.0017668739,0.26631004,0.0015225343,0.0012652919,0.14457253,0.5516511,0.00026174125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23009181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25947842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23009181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045953263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029018864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45750505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094373958","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.0301-1","title":"SEX, LIES, AND HIV: <i>MABIOR</i> AND THE CONCEPT OF SEXUAL FRAUD","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Sexual assault; Test (biology); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Hiv test; Criminology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Poison control; Family medicine; Demography; Human factors and ergonomics; Medical emergency; Epistemology; Population; Biology; Health services","score_opus":0.006032792113304776,"score_gpt":0.19912697218950715,"score_spread":0.19309418007620238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094373958","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11000837,0.045865078,0.0028323308,0.5901773,0.0011175829,0.000031079664,0.000057453206,0.000020371173,0.24989045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95831376,0.006810893,0.00045483332,0.025117055,0.00070026953,0.000027699418,0.000010765862,0.000008025024,0.008556708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995369,0.0028595522,0.00012371733,0.00016775198,0.0006686344,0.00081121223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662495,0.0019422318,0.00054261176,0.00017546811,0.00032594154,0.0003888774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042480547,0.00029949754,0.0003725054,0.0012755127,0.008196821,0.009716754,0.0011935788,0.00783427,0.0019214858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007733408,0.00026388865,0.00032416102,0.0012358968,0.06419843,0.0064065857,0.004968535,0.0068516745,0.0001600451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059811623,0.0000060799016,0.00046244016,0.000015784313,0.0000018057765,0.000112076814,0.01238547,0.00004348436,0.000020584053,0.98119044,0.0038770596,0.001878917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002809494,0.00003531037,0.003432445,0.0006232077,0.000019267154,0.00078772084,0.05616653,0.0005094515,0.0002453343,0.76599604,0.17209941,0.000057205667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09659595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08235609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09659595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012047359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010611947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19206738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094858247","doi":"10.1350/ijep.2009.13.4.329","title":"Reasonable Doubt in Credibility Contests: Sexual Assault and Sexual Equality","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Credibility; Sexual assault; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.1403326277753384,"score_gpt":0.410591200654629,"score_spread":0.2702585728792906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094858247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08957842,0.018422592,0.03282699,0.24767578,0.0011066456,0.0000885416,0.00009962037,0.00003613424,0.61016536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885039,0.0015111713,0.00139081,0.0037792297,0.00056608353,0.00003308371,0.000011439836,0.000012002482,0.0041922852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97504497,0.014886336,0.0008572526,0.001413713,0.004852533,0.0029451791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93625313,0.0519102,0.0037360063,0.0020171741,0.0045870584,0.001496394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025386963,0.00046792557,0.0011356587,0.0033668464,0.011196419,0.015415843,0.0028708281,0.018055005,0.0074690026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08017664,0.00053109694,0.00091392425,0.0031609011,0.06615902,0.020186711,0.008931997,0.010636964,0.00041110476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011986082,0.0000045331626,0.00020529446,0.000017304541,0.0000036545969,0.00019803582,0.0031206661,0.000092702176,0.000023193496,0.9939719,0.00078071695,0.0015700826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020276553,0.000008768138,0.0006050777,0.0001577223,0.000011683143,0.0002064421,0.0038252391,0.000519176,0.00010340682,0.9846075,0.0099118715,0.000022721033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041479245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041091576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041479245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015234622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010098296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13426065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096001295","doi":"","title":"Flesh, Bones and Other Matters","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Flesh; Business; Political science; Fishery; Biology","score_opus":0.011428788353467974,"score_gpt":0.2590763152562515,"score_spread":0.24764752690278355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096001295","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008452019,0.010836053,0.001974509,0.05456592,0.002679212,0.000014105972,0.00006820224,0.000034275243,0.92137563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28157645,0.0052176914,0.0011589956,0.023000395,0.001516607,0.00002333714,0.00007979234,0.00017606166,0.68725055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980842,0.00073825265,0.000060581093,0.00025418663,0.00057280745,0.00029002456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990037,0.00040201753,0.00009159105,0.00014266052,0.0001792322,0.00018079545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001979051,0.0004193194,0.0004276596,0.0009867088,0.009188344,0.005334452,0.00090695015,0.00436799,0.04405629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058026253,0.0002598743,0.00026472326,0.0010037443,0.024407115,0.007644054,0.0045347773,0.0039048549,0.0058524543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020711856,0.000009279157,0.00031216,0.000075465454,0.000004205975,0.00037338966,0.024778567,0.000033966906,0.00018672679,0.8612742,0.084410466,0.028520912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000238582,0.000009623947,0.00046779812,0.00016314069,0.0000018023136,0.00026406834,0.010503408,0.00001599472,0.00006771031,0.04247337,0.9460248,0.000005834703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027794972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057159025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04405629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031545623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024171395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14738297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096098348","doi":"10.21083/csieci.v6i1.1083","title":"“I Made a Promise to a Lady”: Critical Legal Pluralism as Improvised Law in Buffy the Vampire Slayer","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vampire; Law; Legal pluralism; Legal realism; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Jurisprudence; Legal history; Improvisation; Legal profession; Political science; Public law; Literature","score_opus":0.04340869686802095,"score_gpt":0.42262003839496126,"score_spread":0.3792113415269403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096098348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09807903,0.009544272,0.007820743,0.39875314,0.0035934148,0.00007028422,0.00002406025,0.00008197936,0.48203304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8816344,0.001974701,0.0020100242,0.029187385,0.001538493,0.00008907549,0.000013404545,0.00010606625,0.083446346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695516,0.0018510143,0.000029884954,0.00026481564,0.00050093315,0.00039821307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758184,0.0017291557,0.00014421274,0.000096115524,0.00017997186,0.00026867614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00309588,0.00026233835,0.00030139924,0.0010481671,0.013849001,0.011514069,0.0009808326,0.0057717245,0.004360262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007540176,0.00028456055,0.0002398716,0.0007019951,0.031512767,0.008393092,0.0053856247,0.010096566,0.00046275088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015443935,0.000026635124,0.00022280397,0.000023320024,0.0000017287439,0.0002474954,0.04590164,0.000090566275,0.0001039258,0.9227966,0.024558697,0.0060111624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030249941,0.000036592166,0.00082387874,0.0005271089,0.0000071092923,0.00022550975,0.08242722,0.0010429688,0.00050859526,0.3839079,0.5304213,0.000041502222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012105824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018126916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013849001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071777175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003827597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052078187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096243417","doi":"10.1525/ahu.2002.27.2.210","title":"A Place to Write: The Bartender as Ethnographer","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropology & Humanism","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Psychology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.043846452778691626,"score_gpt":0.3490375922752521,"score_spread":0.30519113949656046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096243417","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14124809,0.10927368,0.0223683,0.5628428,0.01628915,0.0005950558,0.0008636372,0.0007306674,0.14578858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7839694,0.039428953,0.018839186,0.06533453,0.0027171914,0.002117045,0.0003267972,0.0008048354,0.086462185],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835368,0.014422301,0.0002598775,0.00037474217,0.00071777403,0.0006884765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701928,0.023129998,0.0010106231,0.0010107233,0.001550345,0.0031054795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012340534,0.00072123215,0.00061287434,0.004326343,0.021855172,0.01272187,0.0020177306,0.00469596,0.00579866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032819703,0.0009020116,0.00025988446,0.004043491,0.02105334,0.024334809,0.011962118,0.007231976,0.0015576021],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057378686,0.000043893437,0.00055044703,0.0002413955,0.000006070007,0.0010005374,0.77727604,0.00005510497,0.0005566302,0.028279139,0.15562147,0.036311973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012047853,0.00001836861,0.00045039982,0.0006620284,0.0000050625126,0.0005147172,0.73905313,0.000068447705,0.000231302,0.013492705,0.24546233,0.000029335573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059519997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02469375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021855172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003115072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00448384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06526375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20975908","doi":"10.6026/97320630004448","title":"MCKENZIE LEIPER, Jean — Bar Codes: Women in the Legal Profession.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Histoire sociale","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Legal profession; Sociology; Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.016169794039655724,"score_gpt":0.2881490402574662,"score_spread":0.27197924621781044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20975908","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043037552,0.025447527,0.0014008846,0.2744654,0.054965664,0.00024032548,0.0030813452,0.0016701506,0.63442487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011962327,0.010864653,0.0006164882,0.029096011,0.003337198,0.00009704934,0.00039173913,0.00031748836,0.94331706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939907,0.00010006711,0.000032959313,0.00017063205,0.0001632318,0.0001340395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978167,0.00030434108,0.00013910819,0.000055934972,0.00043953361,0.0012444435],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005713197,0.00077582186,0.00044665352,0.0010483569,0.0028209006,0.0019480861,0.0007176952,0.0026828898,0.65710634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004314651,0.00028781098,0.0002183145,0.0005177391,0.0008206403,0.0016165883,0.0027875116,0.0029572165,0.3030317],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003038609,0.000028188004,0.00068358803,0.00008080863,0.0000018072082,0.000597781,0.00020001036,0.000015171262,0.0001556962,0.001195693,0.87566686,0.121343955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046762816,0.000021803015,0.001189141,0.00025916984,0.0000014928772,0.0014206815,0.00078720367,0.000026196527,0.000069400354,0.0006892433,0.9955213,0.000009680106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007372697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015877316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65710634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001188446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020124097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48909616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20984337","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2618","title":"Book Notes: The Structures of Law and Literature: Duty, Justice, and Evil in the Cultural Imagination, by Jeffrey Miller","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Economic Justice; Duty; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Ecology","score_opus":0.010689751736481684,"score_gpt":0.2789487341041441,"score_spread":0.26825898236766244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20984337","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037557136,0.18003424,0.0022397353,0.4473149,0.007116292,0.000042970772,0.00020465525,0.00010435552,0.35918722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09954087,0.1275734,0.005452448,0.07336459,0.01343465,0.00018074262,0.00024574526,0.00016677937,0.6800408],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947137,0.00017903125,0.000020605277,0.00005614519,0.00022945312,0.000043369877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991786,0.0004542677,0.00006274538,0.000041863852,0.00018000741,0.000082533814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006801141,0.00046775787,0.0002891041,0.0012426375,0.003935235,0.0038229523,0.0005883561,0.0018196979,0.0097675035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024231167,0.00031472108,0.00019211571,0.0013640131,0.0054874783,0.005299642,0.0013280995,0.0036328977,0.002133981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005714516,0.000011910381,0.00017236435,0.00006530575,0.0000015152664,0.000047292506,0.0032450242,0.000055475717,0.00011966505,0.14970128,0.82835525,0.018219175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026073726,0.0000060767825,0.00076698593,0.0002783972,0.0000019649638,0.00007538876,0.0021282777,0.000051545077,0.000060491813,0.023498934,0.97312397,0.0000053875624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027081694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06448411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027081694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003821498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040396582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053848147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100254889","doi":"10.1017/s000842390707028x","title":"Filibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the US Senate","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Legislature; Political science; Democracy; Law; Gerrymandering; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.017683074078097567,"score_gpt":0.2983068408612913,"score_spread":0.28062376678319373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100254889","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13151728,0.18104129,0.0010041326,0.36312157,0.0012381503,0.00003221527,0.0008687922,0.000049497914,0.3211271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9151772,0.036393344,0.0003007936,0.013213207,0.0007375715,0.000050260365,0.0001737597,0.00003665646,0.033917192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740773,0.001379502,0.000102303515,0.00017091555,0.00031613166,0.00062341185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797696,0.0010789534,0.0003769471,0.0000532695,0.00026753359,0.0002464313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025025166,0.00041593824,0.000316637,0.0020362332,0.012491157,0.011766149,0.00090594654,0.0059704855,0.008152727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048399265,0.00043501888,0.00040048297,0.00518414,0.012387932,0.010104681,0.004728876,0.0040671933,0.0008325501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006705081,0.00006825938,0.010827218,0.00012291178,0.000027585858,0.00066777336,0.069522455,0.0002331944,0.00014834448,0.743032,0.15464191,0.0206413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030554715,0.00004903718,0.056114808,0.0010838896,0.0000581387,0.000493241,0.12996522,0.00024203862,0.00040529703,0.13995913,0.6714905,0.00010815411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13109858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3216085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13109858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008839388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066815307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26067096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100606532","doi":"10.1177/0964663907086454","title":"Postcard from the Edge (of Empire)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Ottawa; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Convention; Work (physics); Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.07429091018619156,"score_gpt":0.3549087649283203,"score_spread":0.28061785474212875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100606532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003629556,0.0019367769,0.001744394,0.020844553,0.03660857,0.00019204248,0.0016859617,0.00082098594,0.93253714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010743734,0.0006000065,0.0005943323,0.002394625,0.003214749,0.000047071524,0.00040745284,0.0003945436,0.9816034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917245,0.00016807468,0.000055499248,0.00011736737,0.0003490069,0.0001375906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717677,0.0006406242,0.00013542369,0.00040247428,0.0011048375,0.0005398902],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090410764,0.0004562961,0.00041321898,0.0012767853,0.0029297085,0.0046648015,0.0005940812,0.0012548245,0.4813511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006027934,0.0002188113,0.00019194251,0.001446272,0.00081228686,0.002772024,0.002565961,0.0023302664,0.18902759],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046956953,0.000008470913,0.00012022357,0.00004884903,0.0000012364185,0.00010004719,0.0002959117,0.000013766917,0.00025652142,0.011892246,0.9478949,0.039320827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022243455,0.0000074768654,0.00020365098,0.00001848667,3.900166e-7,0.00002460095,0.00013498495,0.000016105916,0.000059761696,0.00039606026,0.99913424,0.0000020576015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030014392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067091114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4813511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012783051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010548759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7397897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100743486","doi":"10.1353/crv.0.0034","title":"Tonto on Vacation, or How to Be an Indian Lawyer","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.05002889077552881,"score_gpt":0.3741474342846523,"score_spread":0.3241185435091235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100743486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019289762,0.020077527,0.00045090204,0.098709196,0.0037841194,0.000033653472,0.00003557856,0.00008063169,0.8575387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4670607,0.023628134,0.00083500316,0.07052817,0.002069693,0.00006992439,0.000055836324,0.00008016778,0.43567237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986357,0.0005251929,0.000031507243,0.00015415803,0.00021526324,0.00043811966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983852,0.00042325008,0.00012862659,0.00011157095,0.00019283027,0.0007585309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093904644,0.0001626069,0.000206188,0.00043237113,0.0076500825,0.0069054705,0.0007398359,0.0017327912,0.020974427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038126789,0.0001424779,0.00010852331,0.0005968815,0.0071389964,0.004984102,0.0020828191,0.003403581,0.0037453598],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024491985,0.00015376243,0.0032759039,0.00039954204,0.0000073110805,0.0008248017,0.05694723,0.00003991922,0.00055405736,0.32154584,0.5060828,0.110144414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030236567,0.000017120954,0.0015099142,0.00018114962,0.00000262188,0.00025997305,0.030827316,0.000010122724,0.000052202493,0.0027384318,0.9643898,0.000008244099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02527142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069720335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9747286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030806065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066711023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07016647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100878698","doi":"","title":"In the Lawscape - Introduction to the Edited Collection 'Law and the City'","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Space (punctuation); Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.005275368767548581,"score_gpt":0.25428148162324227,"score_spread":0.24900611285569368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100878698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017210912,0.099154495,0.009761113,0.046690006,0.12666373,0.00018795651,0.0038471578,0.0008488757,0.7111256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026353683,0.07896507,0.005958905,0.020176237,0.04671756,0.00042916372,0.00471849,0.0016902644,0.8149905],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991073,0.00026460088,0.000067527835,0.00011888294,0.00035867307,0.000083009654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982584,0.00100756,0.000105741485,0.00016502486,0.00034480778,0.00011837471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000860245,0.0010271491,0.00057214836,0.0040405006,0.0025747567,0.0062406114,0.0010613257,0.0016845408,0.07344063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032799668,0.0003835747,0.0005658983,0.0042468305,0.0034066297,0.0037544467,0.002431344,0.0029481396,0.017574321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005752462,0.000009674532,0.000054100565,0.00016975535,0.000002286169,0.000042283507,0.0007550196,0.00008253506,0.00010184812,0.048638303,0.92713356,0.023004953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.77806e-7,0.0000025509069,0.0001528239,0.00015062872,7.026999e-7,0.000036018366,0.00018137455,0.000015679327,0.000023024972,0.00296969,0.9964635,0.000003407964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008842994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021028284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07344063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036527559,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031928383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24568343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104057652","doi":"10.29173/cons17203","title":"Forgery: Legislation Gone Mad or Legitimate Social Threat?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constellations","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Punishment (psychology); Politics; Context (archaeology); Law; Criminology; Sociology; Period (music); Political science; History; Art; Psychology; Social psychology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.07190895629218348,"score_gpt":0.3508338260328907,"score_spread":0.27892486974070724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104057652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7127566,0.013387285,0.00083988154,0.10775718,0.0007565955,0.00004304294,0.00005216298,0.000022822163,0.16438444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697131,0.0019604857,0.00011949612,0.0054696742,0.0000845081,0.000014517332,0.000009462785,0.000017971823,0.022610765],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940952,0.0031418533,0.00032206223,0.0004721091,0.0006810743,0.0012876703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939989,0.0029715903,0.0015439426,0.00039484163,0.00045997638,0.0006307214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003581822,0.00028971912,0.00034070824,0.0010426537,0.016503004,0.0096505955,0.0012086453,0.0060725957,0.0037510009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01145414,0.00057751127,0.00027054132,0.0010193692,0.056166086,0.008194577,0.0065640975,0.005980985,0.00049316505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029298992,0.000012725864,0.0034537585,0.00010209884,0.000010054964,0.0018254088,0.685802,0.00004920552,0.00020353362,0.29586124,0.0073514883,0.0052991677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001757772,0.00006294403,0.008130535,0.0006346086,0.000015190707,0.0013615097,0.65645117,0.0000532221,0.0006752118,0.0198216,0.31270918,0.00006731299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05676629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09370221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05676629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013170916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00625398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112871766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105500520","doi":"10.1353/hms.2012.0009","title":"Hume’s Aesthetic Standard","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intuition; Taste; Philosophy; Epistemology; Criticism; Normative; Ideal (ethics); Verdict; Interpretation (philosophy); Aesthetics; Psychology; Literature; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07452832255004596,"score_gpt":0.38613295899672495,"score_spread":0.311604636446679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105500520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028835349,0.0022761477,0.042839874,0.04546366,0.0010807458,0.0000563926,0.00007714463,0.00009448767,0.8792761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9458406,0.0006225122,0.008116315,0.007843887,0.00064485613,0.00008976148,0.000039098533,0.00008310919,0.036719907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908853,0.004249273,0.00031391703,0.0011439893,0.00273325,0.00067417853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946104,0.0020184845,0.0003305341,0.00085374934,0.0018414888,0.00034529663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008211227,0.00043345586,0.0005823416,0.0020785637,0.0060608503,0.0065458296,0.00093435345,0.0035807127,0.0029959308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01576276,0.00029980062,0.00047530944,0.00091863767,0.040393747,0.0063364953,0.0036482827,0.0054239333,0.000768884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055131554,0.00000334496,0.00010606813,0.000007135799,0.0000019776637,0.000014659984,0.0011923509,0.00007218732,0.000036837973,0.99328244,0.0027939994,0.002483484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006224849,0.00000948957,0.0002057294,0.000025432466,0.0000022261568,0.00004005525,0.0005166446,0.00026376633,0.00011231866,0.9597593,0.03904899,0.000009911014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003024486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031500657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008211227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043295263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030175233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04342562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106800433","doi":"10.22329/il.v23i2.2164","title":"The Rationality of Legal Discourse in Habermas's Discourse Theory","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rationality; Epistemology; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Morality; Discourse ethics; Politics; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01782479360331115,"score_gpt":0.3270627110829669,"score_spread":0.3092379174796558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106800433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05315671,0.013329731,0.37097564,0.08715295,0.0007331516,0.00027924252,0.00027153632,0.00037704158,0.47372395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92236793,0.002501236,0.05673909,0.002494209,0.0004967724,0.00038897086,0.00009162692,0.00009210282,0.014828113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752186,0.016602842,0.0010819497,0.0020862706,0.0036093479,0.0014008788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857867,0.010291463,0.0009615348,0.0011594779,0.0013708099,0.00043011233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020470485,0.0009154241,0.0013712145,0.005455892,0.006479607,0.013521569,0.002721956,0.007758946,0.004633829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021591568,0.00069938414,0.0013720439,0.0036180138,0.049861796,0.020529322,0.0057754335,0.0049326816,0.0009864672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037174095,0.000002834888,0.000023689232,0.000010042664,0.0000015715109,0.00001054553,0.0009519369,0.00016124632,0.000013469659,0.99777466,0.0002616096,0.00078453723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011519533,0.0000032505882,0.000030447336,0.000023453278,0.0000033745628,0.000011747879,0.00030497194,0.0008218194,0.00005003156,0.99052215,0.008211351,0.000005980092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061073434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024307221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020470485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011239823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055146273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10825956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111566344","doi":"10.7202/017331ar","title":"La pensée postmoderne et la criminologie","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Postmodernism; Postmodernity; Sociology; Epistemology; Legitimation; Reflexivity; Relation (database); Pessimism; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Social science; Psychology; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.3533403366246277,"score_gpt":0.4401932399698588,"score_spread":0.0868529033452311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111566344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031274036,0.15579888,0.061763927,0.23808646,0.0105160065,0.00007963581,0.000096643984,0.00019030493,0.5021941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7751592,0.06513649,0.023272503,0.023234328,0.014679236,0.000434723,0.000074697826,0.000288509,0.097720385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791566,0.015292311,0.00041915357,0.0009508641,0.0035091888,0.00067179446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9614798,0.029801467,0.0027072749,0.0031654993,0.0022438555,0.0006021708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016656024,0.001005312,0.00070959737,0.004631303,0.007133218,0.016091477,0.0016271183,0.004898184,0.007419627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021489494,0.00043756687,0.00048905093,0.0035735809,0.05507194,0.015194227,0.005599234,0.009688573,0.0010711321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007754348,0.000014106824,0.00021007852,0.000093976596,0.000004570918,0.00005982272,0.010729424,0.000048535167,0.00009114023,0.97371733,0.0025683367,0.012454834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011643194,0.000051369636,0.0010456864,0.00077330996,0.000006425784,0.0007645752,0.009356459,0.00043240763,0.00061508175,0.44219044,0.54472375,0.000028883354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004889898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049087843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016656024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010164658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068810983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088086545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112284780","doi":"10.1177/1743872113499226","title":"Museums as Constitutions: A Commentary on Constitutions and Constitution Making","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Negotiation; Politics; Meaning (existential); Political science; Focus (optics); Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025410171433975046,"score_gpt":0.27568247295736176,"score_spread":0.2502723015233867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112284780","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011569991,0.02142706,0.0003711681,0.9347506,0.018580586,0.000015719042,0.00005251902,0.00001850316,0.023626858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10078721,0.021050151,0.0010051742,0.79881394,0.044606082,0.00022991131,0.00007783153,0.0001536383,0.033276126],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990101,0.0052745733,0.0004067702,0.0007806194,0.002289269,0.0011477635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96827143,0.028083695,0.0007081805,0.00040154325,0.001803566,0.00073168456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008888154,0.00082065904,0.0011562229,0.002590207,0.019093085,0.0101404,0.005134762,0.041124366,0.005434108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025312452,0.00065935566,0.0011358043,0.00375178,0.029857703,0.013807087,0.005353014,0.030046105,0.0009810078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002776899,0.000010712292,0.00006368381,0.00018928546,0.0000055274577,0.00025581042,0.009376402,0.00015619962,0.00006890184,0.32617462,0.6603711,0.0032999455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043863372,0.000017637409,0.0003449562,0.0010945965,0.000015686841,0.00009555311,0.008683342,0.00020098737,0.00013326811,0.065033086,0.9242983,0.00003869095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07985295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14051148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07985295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020549774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018086642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15877628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112399751","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v4n1p153","title":"On Regulation of Celebrity Endorsement in China","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Advertising; Relevance (law); Obligation; China; Business; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.020777902631200787,"score_gpt":0.2782065219296713,"score_spread":0.25742861929847055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112399751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9215228,0.0022810958,0.0026359572,0.0047243824,0.00012918716,0.00012592728,0.00017037947,0.000060756927,0.06834959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98438185,0.000638518,0.00058573205,0.0005348758,0.000043404696,0.000043128486,0.00005727289,0.000005244828,0.013709963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99717003,0.00042483877,0.00025326354,0.00043920646,0.0010952745,0.00061739417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979482,0.00064760004,0.00041511733,0.00020673094,0.0005768373,0.00020548161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029185296,0.00026027055,0.0003048373,0.0012765998,0.004086837,0.002410677,0.0009806158,0.0015710928,0.0021931713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027622867,0.0003145462,0.00047536267,0.0015285682,0.0026343537,0.0010283333,0.0017691954,0.0010863137,0.00012826735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030614465,0.00042613316,0.24149199,0.00065503974,0.00024375296,0.005869603,0.030256659,0.007873716,0.024606535,0.5683928,0.017745461,0.10213219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016574797,0.00050989597,0.66458696,0.00036358074,0.00050515414,0.0010694775,0.008416518,0.036493953,0.013814153,0.055235527,0.2183604,0.00047857326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14762972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12597667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14762972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075913602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010661143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2935409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112450001","doi":"10.3138/cjls.26.3.531","title":"Le droit est aussi une question de visibilité: l'occupation des espaces publics et les parcours judiciaires des personnes itinérantes à Montréal et à Ottawa","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université de Montréal; Polytechnique Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Publics; Humanities; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.021332906981439418,"score_gpt":0.26502153601678874,"score_spread":0.24368862903534932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112450001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94945866,0.0010289947,0.00029523592,0.011797978,0.00005682781,0.000027845934,0.00035640586,0.000008690087,0.03696943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887937,0.0005219769,0.00007657523,0.00033766477,0.000011336589,0.000011965309,0.000055872,0.000004387566,0.010186461],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998302,0.00034918005,0.000040164527,0.00017505593,0.00035293237,0.00078064145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664116,0.00050669385,0.00069939956,0.0001307147,0.0009810338,0.0010409689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011256943,0.00026643215,0.0003124186,0.000977872,0.010577473,0.0060869167,0.001350565,0.0008330894,0.013488312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003562426,0.0002540566,0.00028702916,0.002174189,0.008098984,0.0017909518,0.0029936612,0.001411385,0.0004986744],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017803338,0.0001466183,0.51937574,0.00028654555,0.00010523944,0.0008886216,0.36984763,0.000670103,0.0014042769,0.051691636,0.012212243,0.043193396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009464544,0.000053149866,0.52122164,0.00027162855,0.000050776544,0.000091589485,0.43563235,0.00021229971,0.00027488286,0.0010740587,0.04104253,0.00006554951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9758833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9871344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039505176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039505176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043678403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28663146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113711948","doi":"10.7202/1119925ar","title":"White as Milk: Proposition 8 and the Cultural Politics of Gay Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Politics; Gender studies; Proposition; Queer; Sociology; Lesbian; White (mutation); State (computer science); Racialization; Meaning (existential); Mainstream; Ballot; Political science; Law; Race (biology); Psychology","score_opus":0.04440175293975119,"score_gpt":0.3760774048393221,"score_spread":0.33167565189957093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113711948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33355328,0.0028347746,0.0023306895,0.15727545,0.0009822568,0.000033922377,0.000027594322,0.000021335707,0.5029407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808967,0.00041450656,0.00021549892,0.0070692915,0.00013049632,0.000020599568,0.0000054184998,0.000014223798,0.0112332795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964786,0.0026018452,0.00003211735,0.00020905527,0.00025792682,0.00042053853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982869,0.0011456744,0.0001797552,0.00007806836,0.00012933211,0.00018027847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003815741,0.00029101415,0.0001775996,0.0005271012,0.014645759,0.008936548,0.0006094946,0.0030333025,0.0029358617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039907596,0.00024511438,0.00017122524,0.0003396063,0.03410933,0.0049501183,0.0035060414,0.005864602,0.00019324082],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028688395,0.00002476318,0.0006612542,0.00001877681,0.0000035808089,0.0002885166,0.19734357,0.00004686614,0.0003763443,0.791656,0.006210585,0.0033411589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038865648,0.0000760022,0.0034457895,0.0003312085,0.000025456213,0.0001927408,0.48986042,0.00048463297,0.0017762118,0.15604158,0.34768137,0.000045685094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026875418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036292598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026875418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004477523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028181993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05343795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116666104","doi":"10.1111/jacc.12189","title":"Prohibition Gangsters: The Rise and Fall of a Bad GenerationMarcMappen. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2013.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of American Culture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Fall of man; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.009206832893477596,"score_gpt":0.234436766128119,"score_spread":0.2252299332346414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116666104","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032451484,0.08394556,0.0010273516,0.6556492,0.010236422,0.0000782627,0.001032687,0.00017462744,0.21540444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4537096,0.066290796,0.0021998077,0.17771748,0.002286245,0.00019247938,0.0009251442,0.00027226465,0.29640618],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977729,0.00064301386,0.000102613725,0.00012632892,0.0006780578,0.0006770111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746907,0.00072425435,0.00037470832,0.00019852803,0.00048683016,0.00074664556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027063014,0.00046339733,0.00026623943,0.0012449583,0.006598612,0.005175358,0.0017195825,0.004862502,0.010773565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008147821,0.0006134482,0.00030581333,0.0017062391,0.0074617383,0.0047204164,0.00413271,0.007907168,0.0017237674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041647807,0.00007950538,0.005486889,0.00016937984,0.000013092847,0.00032587568,0.013790149,0.0001328708,0.00018907078,0.10441324,0.75719005,0.118168205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012114143,0.000022151991,0.018417727,0.0008428034,0.000020978867,0.00021187641,0.031485744,0.000091145506,0.00032321777,0.01139471,0.9371292,0.000048471225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3153474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62163055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3153474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004210305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016985709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62702376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116936933","doi":"10.1177/1741659015601173","title":"Digitizing rape culture: Online sexual violence and the power of the digital photograph","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crime Media Culture An International Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Torture; Sexual violence; Photography; Interpretation (philosophy); Power (physics); Psychology; Digital media; Criminology; Sociology; Art; History; Visual arts; Political science; Law; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.028265711818866633,"score_gpt":0.31367844805979833,"score_spread":0.2854127362409317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116936933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61617804,0.007365951,0.0055852355,0.039420348,0.0005237467,0.0000680106,0.000102941995,0.000081786864,0.33067393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886309,0.003057986,0.00074040715,0.0015780271,0.00020398815,0.000025308762,0.000018956616,0.00002848636,0.0057160016],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964605,0.0025705374,0.00011811792,0.00019546581,0.0004773813,0.00017807365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99047476,0.006897888,0.0011061146,0.0009684876,0.00032601776,0.0002267634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028720584,0.00031403953,0.0002159313,0.0021224823,0.007118523,0.011147792,0.00088559225,0.0017993965,0.006101849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012298463,0.0003013599,0.0002784411,0.0016449796,0.018123686,0.009477827,0.0074763303,0.0023498589,0.0005185955],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058277383,0.00006497754,0.011280523,0.0003228481,0.000030289288,0.0027425382,0.6958573,0.0001488409,0.0014550698,0.22485335,0.008332586,0.054853484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022417082,0.00008475858,0.012444592,0.0010869603,0.00007472717,0.0055307555,0.6884073,0.00042212137,0.003908505,0.032834884,0.25512186,0.00006107406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004032723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004607151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011147792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002759228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009580074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020412683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119256281","doi":"10.5040/9780567662095.0018","title":"Poetry, Mercy, and the Phenomenology of Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Bloomsbury T&T Clark eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Phenomenology (philosophy); Literature; Philosophy; Economic Justice; Art; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04166927455800757,"score_gpt":0.2880692725568585,"score_spread":0.24639999799885093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119256281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10322232,0.024359088,0.030262105,0.13506296,0.0019052936,0.00012090074,0.00009664729,0.00009823782,0.7048724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732058,0.0035803122,0.0024836727,0.003993876,0.00034371944,0.00011662485,0.000019560279,0.000040149327,0.01621612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99473155,0.004496915,0.00006707032,0.00017766621,0.00029215764,0.00023460686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961041,0.002769725,0.00031704822,0.0003276531,0.00016220161,0.00031925886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003765859,0.00038311607,0.00034574975,0.0015114092,0.009194476,0.009646554,0.0008857568,0.0029634726,0.0023095643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008343358,0.0002530362,0.00035694154,0.0016746633,0.07060279,0.013246542,0.0040146704,0.0043197386,0.0002943276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009585618,0.000009716219,0.00025565905,0.00003801928,0.0000022910046,0.00016895066,0.08466637,0.000067783294,0.00006175442,0.9092936,0.0030255474,0.0024006376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012510448,0.000023108008,0.00054727856,0.0003221236,0.0000037470443,0.00035425182,0.108052924,0.00026388135,0.00010209763,0.7811557,0.109142944,0.000019348272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031621514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002597883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009646554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038928993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026052734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028245091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121573368","doi":"","title":"SHAKESPEARE AND THE DRAMA OF POLITIC STRATAGEMS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Drama; Body politic; Politics; Character (mathematics); Literature; History; Reading (process); Philosophy; Law; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.004231828476204762,"score_gpt":0.16566469580903218,"score_spread":0.1614328673328274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121573368","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016117074,0.017057747,0.0026341984,0.049125712,0.0031697848,0.00002473923,0.00006553634,0.00006955248,0.9117358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6762953,0.009720316,0.0011709115,0.0089061605,0.0015790078,0.00006534131,0.00007544588,0.00018836494,0.30199906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975011,0.0013183523,0.000043862277,0.00022110651,0.00048049566,0.00043502325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881905,0.00065140054,0.000092358554,0.00008901318,0.00015166076,0.00019640628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021531691,0.0005811858,0.00036258937,0.0010749605,0.014603156,0.008474054,0.0005050992,0.002304601,0.009602402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034792093,0.00030851006,0.0002803216,0.0011636175,0.022063859,0.0046076253,0.0024808473,0.0045160563,0.0026910524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016194932,0.000009644481,0.0001230306,0.000035075624,0.0000030510914,0.000092139155,0.020817677,0.00007672832,0.00006079819,0.9331192,0.041653655,0.0039927773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009990836,0.000020907797,0.00046377062,0.00019027319,0.0000033777087,0.000113152026,0.012960584,0.00015287132,0.00014446839,0.08205908,0.9038672,0.000014292895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015727814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02018862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015727814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007241312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00395955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052539647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122011992","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2328699","title":"The Importance of Family Resemblance: 'Series of Transactions' after Copthorne","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vector Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Series (stratigraphy); Mathematics; Computer science; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.01174922712467738,"score_gpt":0.2824328197126265,"score_spread":0.27068359258794916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122011992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43728748,0.0066204304,0.06904308,0.04038895,0.0016819198,0.00010512576,0.0006062721,0.00013688773,0.44412982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98199844,0.0006043466,0.0022396434,0.00041853642,0.00028337882,0.000022393762,0.000040927694,0.00005305249,0.014339167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890065,0.0005116156,0.000045082877,0.00028124126,0.00016943568,0.00009191707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903289,0.0057181525,0.00078897143,0.001724344,0.0010389285,0.0004006666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018509324,0.00021217992,0.0004191909,0.0008816356,0.0029894006,0.002475126,0.00092496444,0.0018178446,0.010536019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02451053,0.00020309632,0.000311962,0.0022860016,0.0055097886,0.008070327,0.0015915859,0.0023568077,0.000640618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010258219,0.000020659178,0.0030961442,0.00004926376,0.000017864131,0.00037557087,0.010535533,0.0005629294,0.0001434689,0.9486725,0.006518563,0.029904861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022359978,0.00007691586,0.013841047,0.00015179894,0.000028569844,0.0009857594,0.00849307,0.004389852,0.0005300331,0.8952502,0.07618308,0.000047245518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059141354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056519276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010536019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011570089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006175652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03524649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122420092","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12160","title":"<i>Nation and Family: Personal Law, Cultural Pluralism, and Gendered Citizenship in India</i> . By Narendra Subramanian. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 2014. 377 pp. $65 paper.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Citation; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03580558090983392,"score_gpt":0.2669816247882507,"score_spread":0.23117604387841678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122420092","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060072215,0.92513245,0.00006530831,0.06167446,0.0030766083,0.00000486141,0.00006547057,0.0000074157497,0.009372773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03185778,0.93785936,0.00012029483,0.009716605,0.006268978,0.000029099441,0.0001632176,0.000014224277,0.01397039],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911314,0.000433422,0.000044968318,0.0000798507,0.00020570871,0.00012283557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982999,0.0010055234,0.00018763213,0.000047788115,0.00026266673,0.00019650723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001155247,0.0006720104,0.0007078892,0.002423224,0.0018424954,0.003762029,0.0009715099,0.0023201616,0.004772927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023860785,0.00038319186,0.00047288105,0.0048266654,0.00413014,0.0047872886,0.0019550733,0.00354727,0.0009850716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003221768,0.00003093567,0.0015937999,0.0011606896,0.000047976606,0.00010059777,0.0022493755,0.00014340185,0.000050263854,0.04171781,0.8740187,0.078854166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015213779,0.000046650028,0.017168585,0.00517366,0.00006220369,0.00033368918,0.006616994,0.00018439292,0.00011298954,0.030397195,0.93985265,0.000035822985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039063808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08432108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039063808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003343762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046375142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0776729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122772823","doi":"10.1177/1743872111406428","title":"Legality Against Orality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Temporality; Orality; Indigenous; History; Oral history; Law; Sociology; Politics; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Political science; Anthropology; Philosophy; Literacy","score_opus":0.07098577379253916,"score_gpt":0.27080291452486,"score_spread":0.19981714073232082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122772823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041243605,0.005374751,0.020766895,0.07905132,0.00093575916,0.000042494346,0.000049775204,0.00007141191,0.852464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492269,0.0019047465,0.002853113,0.01259451,0.0008965898,0.00009231042,0.000025556621,0.00007428997,0.032331895],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848658,0.0068517,0.0006354966,0.0020856396,0.004195552,0.0013657247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97708344,0.013209943,0.0024751297,0.0035926413,0.0027244377,0.0009144855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01244432,0.00035875815,0.0006443402,0.0018784915,0.011109732,0.013619414,0.001746304,0.006128486,0.0064605167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028761854,0.00037687097,0.000506862,0.0016030654,0.07792152,0.010654839,0.011283153,0.011119208,0.0009518997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029728708,0.0000037564448,0.00012681224,0.000016790194,0.0000022839356,0.000025962168,0.0038927768,0.000021666527,0.000033583445,0.9925362,0.00074829045,0.002588932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012487738,0.000017933651,0.000467516,0.00026004092,0.000016183545,0.00013310919,0.004080896,0.00019404545,0.00046133986,0.8633469,0.13099295,0.000016662127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008149971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006694693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013619414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006384599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007798108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06581265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123047049","doi":"10.7557/13.1349","title":"Lying in Wait to be Found: Reliquary Communities of Memories","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nordlit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Yukon University","funders":"","keywords":"Lying; Business; History; Medicine","score_opus":0.07562343964041512,"score_gpt":0.3211923821992987,"score_spread":0.24556894255888356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123047049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63724566,0.0013274429,0.010679404,0.029945318,0.00043367918,0.00009466595,0.00005932229,0.00013968002,0.3200749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896108,0.000097030694,0.0004950382,0.0006932405,0.000038303893,0.000022301378,0.000012746326,0.000029966057,0.009000605],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954817,0.0025563275,0.000087948676,0.0004434587,0.00044787893,0.0009826352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98333156,0.007096561,0.0021424724,0.0023503888,0.0013913598,0.003687718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061629782,0.00034169175,0.00049092964,0.0019470378,0.0238356,0.010584341,0.0030782307,0.004753487,0.021381715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037811942,0.00063434005,0.00040921138,0.0013765608,0.02779002,0.012386917,0.01544316,0.006143537,0.001208381],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018698382,0.00014933916,0.010732904,0.00007016221,0.000029336907,0.001440635,0.68525153,0.00022224644,0.00039393464,0.25422215,0.013206932,0.034093846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034625893,0.00010423349,0.004730626,0.00019434882,0.000038487768,0.0011281323,0.74137545,0.00077971886,0.00031839433,0.15301597,0.09820466,0.00007536925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0108356895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018296517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0238356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029339457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005186152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07152891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125508979","doi":"10.1111/j.1475-6757.2011.01086.x","title":"The Civil Mutinies of<i>Romeo and Juliet</i>","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Literary Renaissance","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"The Renaissance; Renaissance literature; Download; Art; Classics; Art history; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01986207681379807,"score_gpt":0.2409723838535123,"score_spread":0.22111030703971424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125508979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04039699,0.018978447,0.0009525954,0.11211701,0.0035209095,0.00003251409,0.000100499,0.000081097576,0.82382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7914637,0.002570587,0.00043610483,0.011727616,0.0028968041,0.000050698603,0.00003656831,0.00024125629,0.19057661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972038,0.0013507723,0.00007353325,0.000329878,0.00036110554,0.0006808177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980288,0.0010227403,0.00026557202,0.00023181105,0.00020957447,0.00024137499],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029207212,0.00057240226,0.0005055761,0.0016640145,0.01185959,0.011162709,0.00095395616,0.0042788424,0.00688191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050990395,0.0004335999,0.0002822926,0.001338998,0.039064094,0.0048678494,0.0037706585,0.009421655,0.00096105586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016502456,0.000008308424,0.00009776603,0.000030261961,0.000002651144,0.00010961187,0.034508366,0.000015802687,0.00008267029,0.94525427,0.01802746,0.0018462286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018948973,0.000015605205,0.0013754411,0.0001586457,0.0000069843527,0.00017847531,0.01651578,0.000060836253,0.0004001319,0.053279623,0.9279635,0.000025971756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025761865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054956492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025761865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010144791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003075146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073605895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126838911","doi":"10.7202/014983ar","title":"“I-Do” Feminism Courtesy of Martha Stewart Weddings and HBC’s Vow To Wow Club","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethnologies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Sister; Context (archaeology); Feminism; Rhetoric; Courtesy; Club; Sociology; Art; Gender studies; Clothing; Conjoined twins; Aesthetics; Media studies; Art history; Law; History; Medicine; Philosophy; Political science; Anthropology; Theology","score_opus":0.02689131313625401,"score_gpt":0.33627355013270577,"score_spread":0.30938223699645173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126838911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103928305,0.0077136755,0.0029088838,0.24617136,0.0034186314,0.00003880224,0.000089033274,0.00006749854,0.63566387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8398812,0.0018662802,0.00055909576,0.01788796,0.0008814305,0.00005703845,0.000016801368,0.00007731578,0.13877289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983328,0.0010337335,0.000020608124,0.0001616003,0.00024417142,0.00020702904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984138,0.000982742,0.00008922289,0.00009698677,0.00015341827,0.00026380163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018536266,0.00033103777,0.0002083816,0.00047924038,0.015714658,0.005575416,0.0005300109,0.0024062812,0.0050594965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003568971,0.00021940775,0.00012236195,0.00029049357,0.02374074,0.0033656,0.003215439,0.0061859977,0.0005088918],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034162273,0.000023668166,0.0004828303,0.000037425216,0.000003168324,0.00065909285,0.24916106,0.000040308234,0.00026517845,0.64471513,0.09432916,0.010248757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008167526,0.000024037723,0.00077297114,0.00021064408,0.0000035386897,0.00039533453,0.1781271,0.00010499335,0.0003730216,0.027668267,0.7922981,0.000013832747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034162298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06120118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034162298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003922883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024644707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06792688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129025997","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2002.19146","title":"Pont du Gard Forum: \"Let's Get Real\" - Turning a Blind Eye of Seeing Truth","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Nursing; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.1582243075403029,"score_gpt":0.315792244797463,"score_spread":0.1575679372571601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129025997","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004972007,0.0037875676,0.00038622227,0.95247656,0.03409028,0.000011787862,0.000023032304,0.00005042539,0.008676819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04499565,0.0031446044,0.0010228815,0.82293165,0.032625932,0.00010558974,0.00003371074,0.0003817329,0.09475828],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98592377,0.008634789,0.00035103483,0.0009846113,0.002491175,0.0016146448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9582128,0.028638316,0.0012561261,0.0010817966,0.0033145212,0.0074964063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012806357,0.0012604785,0.0011245277,0.00121071,0.024979755,0.020331888,0.0028961117,0.044517644,0.02480779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068131976,0.00077452586,0.0009039682,0.00092977425,0.019911788,0.019676026,0.011248293,0.058432788,0.0044411803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023479271,0.000015805506,0.0000826431,0.00005870549,0.000005934362,0.00014004753,0.00707768,0.00001933608,0.00011583551,0.031701196,0.95528555,0.0054738116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019796966,0.000013558471,0.00023055215,0.00034424991,0.0000074892264,0.000094681505,0.018430449,0.00008629429,0.00013632979,0.019439468,0.9611597,0.00003749756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016606707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032766074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044517644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005865722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012457095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08299029},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129389142","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0092.2005.00236.x","title":"WOAD, TATTOOING AND IDENTITY IN LATER IRON AGE AND EARLY ROMAN BRITAIN","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford Journal of Archaeology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Painting; Identity (music); Style (visual arts); Construct (python library); Art; Face (sociological concept); Indigenous; Visual arts; Clothing; Shot (pellet); History; Aesthetics; Archaeology; Sociology; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.010601391050170574,"score_gpt":0.2922390280358601,"score_spread":0.28163763698568955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129389142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9279257,0.003390849,0.00014071717,0.0015410392,0.000057542184,0.00000799697,0.000027252745,0.0000030120748,0.06690595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916393,0.00054559245,0.000051550905,0.00010990585,0.000012535868,0.0000030410959,0.000010615622,0.0000038890016,0.0076235165],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891555,0.00037089776,0.000040808012,0.00012511606,0.0002003078,0.00034733486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950325,0.00015721527,0.00012101025,0.000032535194,0.00009404446,0.00009188555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010462039,0.00014183985,0.00031976466,0.0015272689,0.0037678222,0.0027567241,0.0004134625,0.0005823766,0.004650923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018304957,0.00019023512,0.00009668518,0.0019564973,0.009704379,0.0012837786,0.0022759484,0.0012494201,0.0003206903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028654374,0.00012928588,0.035464473,0.000217653,0.000016125396,0.001764515,0.7521529,0.000097941236,0.0013588343,0.15777032,0.002582733,0.048158668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004787187,0.000164168,0.32835743,0.00049945945,0.000017303997,0.0011181863,0.37759277,0.00024052418,0.00089851016,0.0175273,0.2734855,0.00005101579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0586446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09415716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0586446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054265135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014680135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116606474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133872067","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1360","title":"Honest Beliefs, Credible Lies, and Culpable Awareness: Rhetoric, Inequality, and Mens Rea in Sexual Assault","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Culpability; Mens rea; Credibility; Rhetoric; Sexual assault; Rhetorical question; Criminal law; Law; Criminology; Power (physics); Political science; Psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Philosophy","score_opus":0.034796619647920496,"score_gpt":0.3117581100475464,"score_spread":0.2769614903996259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133872067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46479946,0.012101794,0.0046043457,0.15543106,0.00040398166,0.00003231981,0.000032475466,0.000020089177,0.36257446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961514,0.0007359143,0.00018904817,0.0010435081,0.000086278545,0.00000678841,0.0000024257672,0.000005377767,0.0017791939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99330527,0.0046767606,0.00014838728,0.00023848565,0.0010766385,0.00055452634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826613,0.014839708,0.0010871679,0.0002661586,0.0006794693,0.00046620567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006824023,0.00032919977,0.00041338112,0.0023724965,0.013044012,0.009777978,0.001063451,0.0035964479,0.002636921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023869744,0.00026055978,0.00016685743,0.0014344744,0.06389248,0.007418247,0.005880439,0.004925721,0.00012165518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024781644,0.000023710918,0.0013713605,0.000047231126,0.000004576844,0.00019172858,0.20891108,0.00012308767,0.000104553255,0.7782584,0.0015786295,0.009360758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003616191,0.00005860663,0.008116463,0.00066070503,0.000035766454,0.00027240906,0.2434268,0.0012700928,0.0004994417,0.688678,0.05690037,0.000045152367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09721347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.085248075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09721347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017713428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008044835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19329524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135402914","doi":"10.3138/cjls.26.2.301","title":"Custom Made—For a Non-chirographic Critical Legal Pluralism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Royal Society of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Legal pluralism; Normative; Phenomenon; Epistemology; Political science; Sociology; Legal realism; Law; Law and economics; Legal research; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02254422125320196,"score_gpt":0.2757355473109735,"score_spread":0.25319132605777156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135402914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06131169,0.0020192794,0.027126502,0.1928625,0.0022745382,0.000110671084,0.000057237885,0.00010890511,0.71412873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707267,0.00035272326,0.004148544,0.0061497493,0.00040098588,0.00006103163,0.000015473743,0.000042631375,0.018102184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98979294,0.0058134114,0.0003108238,0.0011718649,0.0022613967,0.0006495089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915182,0.0038484598,0.0007935204,0.0014576156,0.0017837702,0.0005985133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007460357,0.0002835839,0.00035839,0.0011652157,0.006918867,0.010488724,0.0010841262,0.0031186517,0.004263503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013792835,0.00023688786,0.0002615619,0.00070838485,0.06341701,0.007982174,0.005043701,0.0062953616,0.0004378673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004902226,0.000006252428,0.00016240185,0.00001351376,0.0000014221532,0.000041542906,0.009040752,0.00003684719,0.00008539819,0.9860238,0.0024551046,0.0021282183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002148422,0.000019142859,0.00065915077,0.00029878036,0.000007886714,0.00019077824,0.034293793,0.0005097502,0.0005140815,0.758329,0.20513545,0.000020727284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074220924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012214556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010488724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007066793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006856397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051273346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136291247","doi":"10.7202/001310ar","title":"L’Enfer de James Nachtwey : protocole pour une photographie compassionnelle","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Protée","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027703211746695475,"score_gpt":0.3242433786687401,"score_spread":0.2965401669220446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136291247","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009958426,0.0023329845,0.058027957,0.029400337,0.008680805,0.8235345,0.0061277784,0.0012898963,0.060647365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017754693,0.00081123447,0.027654072,0.009589968,0.000572338,0.92354304,0.00058731704,0.00016676568,0.019320484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9199907,0.05792448,0.008773004,0.0049429494,0.0047693243,0.0035995306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9101119,0.04306382,0.004428337,0.020553285,0.017450029,0.004392583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.106352404,0.001761297,0.0019718036,0.0026564861,0.0074423263,0.004408495,0.0024301729,0.009907409,0.119486526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1344756,0.0028490615,0.002020718,0.0018768606,0.0051171095,0.005948711,0.005691188,0.011598904,0.03552773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01997905,0.002825843,0.0028217202,0.01862748,0.00019031492,0.002393459,0.060370643,0.0010867945,0.011480229,0.12838086,0.55415934,0.19768427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00438248,0.0014227896,0.003408354,0.005173198,0.00009227272,0.00031621088,0.0068232836,0.0008101262,0.004085871,0.021415314,0.95182633,0.00024379115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042618774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006557005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119486526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006148733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021755086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56245196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136929570","doi":"10.7202/1009163ar","title":"When Literary Censorship Is Not Strictly Enforced, Self-Censorship Rushes In","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TTR traduction terminologie rédaction","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.08191324024894538,"score_gpt":0.3246094682293342,"score_spread":0.2426962279803888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136929570","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23178774,0.003087844,0.06511232,0.031030525,0.0012052025,0.00013932752,0.00007055013,0.0004342262,0.6671322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814248,0.00029587178,0.0024891105,0.0008986904,0.00027423466,0.00005272973,0.000022353124,0.0001102035,0.014432021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.972658,0.017829841,0.0014564142,0.0024474603,0.0044532265,0.0011550601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9570613,0.024071151,0.00426557,0.010374361,0.0031782195,0.0010492856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017888486,0.0004901838,0.00067287654,0.0014709226,0.007307411,0.0128025,0.0014513638,0.0036987823,0.0053618085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04238062,0.0004199174,0.0004143811,0.0015748086,0.05112607,0.011204256,0.006583591,0.005706024,0.00152013],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046879533,0.000030379153,0.0013170154,0.00008782949,0.000013617062,0.0004391657,0.08334986,0.00017179575,0.00093213306,0.88870835,0.002689331,0.022213586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006115504,0.00012769164,0.0037162378,0.0005933945,0.000037479535,0.0013030729,0.05176906,0.0018896104,0.005137787,0.7315338,0.20375606,0.0000745836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001428694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001642119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017888486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004190979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034539388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09460449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138183439","doi":"10.1017/s0940739111000178","title":"The History of Canadian Immunity from Seizure Legislation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Cultural Property","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Context (archaeology); Loan; Law; Political science; State (computer science); Common law; History; Business; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07454699023551731,"score_gpt":0.2750044939067321,"score_spread":0.2004575036712148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138183439","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13826494,0.015192551,0.0019516886,0.12627299,0.0015366607,0.0001539524,0.001092454,0.00016699472,0.71536785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.880703,0.008852002,0.0011407521,0.01822427,0.0002819781,0.000050374358,0.00024707883,0.00010024923,0.09040028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929345,0.00046276953,0.00016860577,0.0006906759,0.0027671433,0.0029762203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913914,0.0015899835,0.00039717357,0.0002720883,0.00499435,0.0013549903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031154645,0.00035750397,0.00040924412,0.0035373736,0.02131291,0.0076512625,0.0017453517,0.0030595937,0.012640032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011424692,0.0005515592,0.000496964,0.004228697,0.0109254755,0.0015276275,0.0034104653,0.0053463792,0.0005202742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007277521,0.000060896848,0.008542755,0.00027463297,0.000040370604,0.0012609933,0.02555279,0.00069676264,0.0006604786,0.7758313,0.099665254,0.08734105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014564441,0.00002805456,0.017097821,0.00036343938,0.00004120667,0.00019473035,0.00599559,0.00027939735,0.00049891876,0.005919856,0.96947,0.00009635321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20692307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20692307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2099398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91985685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139514077","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01291.x","title":"Memorializing Colonial Power: The Death of Frank Paul","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Abandonment (legal); Power (physics); Modernity; White (mutation); Violent death; History; Ethnic Cleansing; Irish; Sociology; Law; Anthropology; Philosophy; Medicine; Political science; Poison control; Archaeology; Ethnic group; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.06927690615232071,"score_gpt":0.36134129005846055,"score_spread":0.29206438390613987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139514077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6642477,0.0070335865,0.0043625985,0.09744693,0.00099319,0.0000686849,0.00003710998,0.000056969107,0.22575319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96406853,0.0017330408,0.00061383174,0.0041693533,0.000121019315,0.000018534012,0.000007212317,0.000023180795,0.029245343],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980028,0.0009200693,0.00004775253,0.0001989021,0.00030418485,0.0005262368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983975,0.0009419084,0.00020351926,0.000055268454,0.00020801264,0.00019366381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015973799,0.00039554408,0.00038593094,0.0006857704,0.02257695,0.0046880706,0.0009652578,0.0035994942,0.0014913171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005343988,0.00032247062,0.00022465872,0.00040567372,0.025274275,0.0038298063,0.004168047,0.0054855742,0.00025184432],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021558764,0.000008374101,0.0007141224,0.00005131814,0.0000037724449,0.0035749266,0.8624832,0.00008191791,0.00040793145,0.12085187,0.006419159,0.005381851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034842137,0.000040249433,0.0012075424,0.00022859818,0.000011805121,0.0031134672,0.74665916,0.00018517282,0.00080703414,0.012978894,0.23472667,0.000037857753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073731616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1277116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073731616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009246095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056978003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1466049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139583994","doi":"10.1353/jls.2006.0025","title":"<i>Delgamuukw</i>: A Legal Straightjacket for Oral Histories?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; Art; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.020077299360849794,"score_gpt":0.26820298963580513,"score_spread":0.24812569027495535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139583994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042924654,0.0148094,0.002813359,0.114739,0.002252592,0.000061915125,0.00019088032,0.00007922328,0.8221289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61908644,0.008418088,0.0014574165,0.013417308,0.0007569924,0.0001434789,0.000118221484,0.00021817998,0.3563838],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988507,0.00049828255,0.000047305446,0.0001359926,0.00024760055,0.00022021106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978696,0.0011417549,0.00016412139,0.00026400606,0.0003143691,0.00024600278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018920539,0.0003514475,0.00024466164,0.0012406507,0.009485745,0.01087672,0.0012094076,0.0022710185,0.03219466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045309453,0.0003354219,0.00010815203,0.0018581641,0.023142792,0.0069385995,0.004395503,0.0035058449,0.0025959082],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018459026,0.000008659496,0.000671222,0.00014490487,0.000002072207,0.00020003911,0.07463982,0.000030025461,0.00023100086,0.87676966,0.029525159,0.01775889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004834629,0.000010659748,0.0016972659,0.00059345574,0.0000052214214,0.0001707832,0.060709126,0.00007039844,0.00031092187,0.04199435,0.8944148,0.000018246465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062515356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13274512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9374846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074125854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005106745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12430292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139640490","doi":"","title":"Gender Equality, Social Values and Provocation Law in the United States, Canada and Australia","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Provocation test; Doctrine; Law; Homicide; Political science; Law reform; Legal doctrine; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.06376707708180342,"score_gpt":0.33697884006182927,"score_spread":0.27321176298002586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139640490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4976934,0.009302929,0.001563295,0.04126481,0.00036631987,0.00010492728,0.00013333246,0.000034983383,0.4495361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840268,0.0015974636,0.00044786255,0.0031259703,0.000035832316,0.00003342405,0.000025265386,0.0000091804795,0.010698386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467576,0.0008867256,0.000106252075,0.00029352139,0.0016642064,0.0023735573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99626476,0.00084713224,0.00033492682,0.00011531307,0.001424463,0.0010134731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023373486,0.00022480314,0.00040422071,0.0022918526,0.019271156,0.0061056386,0.0012329321,0.0020649128,0.0026759747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007561974,0.00023275848,0.00029766402,0.0026193198,0.023024749,0.0015720684,0.0040834267,0.003245436,0.000086096574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027168182,0.00003079712,0.012537115,0.00006450459,0.000019297288,0.00038519045,0.03989937,0.00048384254,0.00022202791,0.9160139,0.0066148955,0.023701947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060259244,0.00010904892,0.24307244,0.00088141515,0.000115706185,0.0005048516,0.15159494,0.001987255,0.00086951413,0.17351569,0.42703325,0.0002556407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9807881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9898198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07535967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07535967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10732723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5467752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142750313","doi":"10.1080/17440572.2011.616071","title":"Hate crimes: uses, controls and controversies, by Phyllis S. Gerstenfeld","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Crime","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.026575360903441106,"score_gpt":0.2752661211012405,"score_spread":0.2486907601977994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142750313","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040993703,0.28689918,0.00024756248,0.689837,0.011353795,0.0000067767933,0.00005674746,0.000017232718,0.011171794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034492582,0.6014702,0.0012224934,0.24204238,0.056268625,0.00006505427,0.0001373859,0.00013996205,0.06416124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824417,0.0007157401,0.00011667071,0.00028525005,0.0005225468,0.00011566809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99196273,0.00590772,0.000484692,0.00015802206,0.0010728348,0.00041398642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039867926,0.0013356876,0.00080950523,0.0025235885,0.0037109954,0.006494657,0.0012757082,0.0065154457,0.0040677744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01339222,0.0006348656,0.00042499925,0.0026791976,0.007846454,0.014713003,0.0023579518,0.011317035,0.0026391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012263924,0.000014282272,0.0001996591,0.00018550806,0.000009622191,0.00005609062,0.0018966248,0.0000686928,0.000042647607,0.03419058,0.9440346,0.019289613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010425652,0.000013135506,0.0013830813,0.0012170611,0.000011625255,0.00023465407,0.0029147593,0.00013998638,0.00008614028,0.04076379,0.95319796,0.000027433827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0124140065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020845518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0124140065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031163932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032715981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024683475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2142875159","doi":"","title":"Heydon' Seek: Looking for Law in All the Wrong Places","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Conservatism; Ideology; Law; Politics; Political science; Judicial activism; Sociology","score_opus":0.023958060621309927,"score_gpt":0.2927951640694125,"score_spread":0.2688371034481025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2142875159","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08085346,0.012998321,0.012988412,0.4847083,0.0037829555,0.000054181455,0.000042793956,0.00011719389,0.40445447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77691144,0.0033299779,0.0060014073,0.07387868,0.00039183308,0.00004390876,0.000017144272,0.00007449498,0.13935101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99751943,0.0010982837,0.000059829894,0.00032418285,0.0005758053,0.00042245377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975916,0.001106374,0.00019640641,0.00018682129,0.00046375344,0.0004549088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038522824,0.00028963212,0.00030816556,0.0008461742,0.012106606,0.009347329,0.00085282105,0.0052321116,0.0069928337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008678393,0.0002259349,0.0001908341,0.000532923,0.020068947,0.009842487,0.003957882,0.005596518,0.00078862655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032039683,0.000021355794,0.0015719633,0.00005838035,0.0000087578,0.00036630896,0.043131616,0.00007736464,0.00046794722,0.81885916,0.09908866,0.036316384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024485456,0.000040783823,0.002966942,0.0003949503,0.000016918739,0.00045057514,0.079162955,0.00040676753,0.001082632,0.379161,0.5362294,0.000062591425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032704066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09177403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032704066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00498952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060325614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065027416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143087668","doi":"10.1111/j.0021-8529.2004.00161.x","title":"Robert Stecker, <i>Interpretation and Construction: Art, Speech, and the Law</i>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Art; Law; Philosophy; Art history; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.006132932018271972,"score_gpt":0.2533086701577008,"score_spread":0.24717573813942884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143087668","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00095593586,0.6853925,0.0020254105,0.24384852,0.008602159,0.00003821162,0.0002580132,0.00012904653,0.0587502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.060974218,0.61564094,0.004164286,0.08529476,0.011862219,0.00021542945,0.0003326641,0.00045277967,0.22106282],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851316,0.0005444772,0.0001274949,0.00016720989,0.0005314659,0.00011614034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976173,0.0014046428,0.00020376654,0.00007445715,0.00056597445,0.00013383219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017408752,0.0012033134,0.0005522433,0.0021415162,0.00366601,0.0052174097,0.0014539617,0.005637531,0.016907811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041513937,0.00080616353,0.00043815753,0.0031275752,0.0041861697,0.008676085,0.0014880458,0.006314218,0.0068571116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021467105,0.000019472121,0.00023707697,0.00020397648,0.000008533431,0.000064035776,0.0015012189,0.000065895016,0.000118341544,0.04399591,0.92773074,0.026033394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012085172,0.000008750092,0.0012027817,0.00068014086,0.000012466586,0.00017916915,0.0021222988,0.00007208982,0.00046198838,0.026989074,0.96823454,0.000024574363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038292654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075457536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038292654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003126028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030184889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07613951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144244468","doi":"10.1017/s1744552310000273","title":"Ambivalence towards law: Business Improvement Associations, public disorder and legal consciousness","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Disenchantment; Ambivalence; Reverence; Legal consciousness; Consciousness; Law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Public law","score_opus":0.01708505304140144,"score_gpt":0.30941448299763724,"score_spread":0.2923294299562358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144244468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7961943,0.0012650763,0.002540248,0.07448393,0.00018986472,0.000029604369,0.000013625861,0.00003090021,0.12525246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986669,0.000104712584,0.000063720756,0.00078244234,0.000018397155,0.0000040893974,0.0000013938069,0.0000022059467,0.00035604194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96813184,0.022700487,0.0005582017,0.0010245914,0.004210041,0.003374749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97411776,0.0144729195,0.0047099474,0.0010956838,0.0019585574,0.0036451563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016095404,0.00018041619,0.00042151604,0.0029679858,0.015953738,0.020374358,0.0010790516,0.004163181,0.0027701752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019730782,0.0003366704,0.00029397733,0.0023195723,0.08423707,0.00912684,0.015449505,0.0062475232,0.00020168262],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024217337,0.00014224622,0.011369469,0.00005429589,0.000011041352,0.00047520138,0.3392287,0.00013512242,0.00026671652,0.6396578,0.0016261591,0.007009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025966685,0.000066014036,0.010332146,0.00032536752,0.000013656691,0.00046711095,0.7214119,0.0004940954,0.00030055296,0.20824352,0.05826437,0.00005524718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064281267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004443536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020374358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008663032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00860787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08512163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144483117","doi":"10.1525/pol.2007.30.2.181","title":"The New Bureaucracies of Virtue: Introduction","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PoLAR Political and Legal Anthropology Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Citation; Bureaucracy; Politics; Library science; Sociology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01719563429246667,"score_gpt":0.3589760708958079,"score_spread":0.34178043660334123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144483117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008700297,0.1363508,0.014258363,0.25015935,0.04163829,0.000085777385,0.00025430313,0.00023774768,0.54831505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39057446,0.10597489,0.009974666,0.08944843,0.0928304,0.0004661295,0.00045166974,0.00081316294,0.30946618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951687,0.002245126,0.0001484959,0.0006149891,0.0011491678,0.00067353324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959347,0.0019864435,0.00030659456,0.0004110409,0.000828379,0.0005328574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029204378,0.0006008753,0.0004765665,0.0019519858,0.004947824,0.014316136,0.0013103767,0.004569427,0.01305597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005476139,0.00039082492,0.0005961024,0.0017558469,0.01975035,0.010668389,0.005065047,0.008723821,0.0033809766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001640962,0.000017965469,0.00039406816,0.000114882394,0.0000028555921,0.000061126855,0.00427574,0.00008653042,0.000098969096,0.8505577,0.12139776,0.022975998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002395219,0.00001182072,0.0005810203,0.00027919406,0.000001959064,0.00010271053,0.0011469482,0.00012154898,0.00005115932,0.10701521,0.89067113,0.000014982131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050662872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040738643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014316136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067053274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004234186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0486508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2145887152","doi":"10.29173/agora10085","title":"The Hypocrisy in our Democracy: Placing Youth Voting in Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; Lawsuit; Perspective (graphical); Voting; Franchise; Democracy; Political science; Law; Politics; Law and economics; Limiting; Sociology; Engineering; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.05079677841113987,"score_gpt":0.3300128408042905,"score_spread":0.2792160623931506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2145887152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18587057,0.009769229,0.009296902,0.24982908,0.0010280316,0.000043292603,0.00010673746,0.000061873485,0.54399425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806898,0.0013729207,0.00041946615,0.008583612,0.00023010137,0.00001200507,0.00001287638,0.000025642712,0.008653558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944734,0.0027173841,0.000057723788,0.0003019772,0.0006971406,0.0017523288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972308,0.0009950291,0.00026403915,0.000158024,0.00063055713,0.0007215529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043185675,0.00033088189,0.0003374043,0.0016236487,0.017655509,0.014394764,0.0013400874,0.0039014048,0.0037211338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052102897,0.000282358,0.00025389943,0.0015083798,0.060282756,0.005943317,0.0048898654,0.01000848,0.0002420629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018268718,0.000011302121,0.003847681,0.000024925886,0.000007156644,0.00022486012,0.08511871,0.00014972687,0.00017931481,0.89569527,0.0064785043,0.008244262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027503716,0.0000435752,0.01118149,0.0005428861,0.000026998023,0.0002651514,0.19076875,0.000579673,0.00066036824,0.44384846,0.35200685,0.00004828121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3616842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5236519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3616842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024057426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025015075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71915793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147039878","doi":"10.1017/s0922156505002591","title":"New Evidence: The Aesthetics of International Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dramatization; War crime; Presentational and representational acting; Context (archaeology); Drama; Law; Presentation (obstetrics); Spanish Civil War; Realism; Political science; Stylized fact; Art; History; Aesthetics; Literature; International law","score_opus":0.027739705874280547,"score_gpt":0.33529464399196535,"score_spread":0.3075549381176848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147039878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061386265,0.016772827,0.0097723305,0.07948774,0.0026857152,0.000030148183,0.000065982385,0.000056051096,0.8849906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8558667,0.0155347865,0.0066763866,0.014762219,0.0048570544,0.0002687791,0.00009417827,0.00031277945,0.10162717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900511,0.006680161,0.00024580903,0.00058302534,0.0018696485,0.00057028723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897585,0.0071191955,0.0005960104,0.0012365003,0.00088328664,0.00040661826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075138593,0.0006720751,0.0005488916,0.0037836956,0.008521521,0.03032228,0.0019711365,0.005260221,0.014182583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022325931,0.00042042971,0.0005903443,0.0031415666,0.05050747,0.017948475,0.007142927,0.0089247525,0.0011982014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000405809,0.000002761471,0.000049964532,0.0000270981,0.0000015294497,0.000042843967,0.0047249496,0.00004273167,0.000016336127,0.98773116,0.0039520296,0.003404612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012052361,0.000013185712,0.0001959928,0.0004412533,0.000010097098,0.00016991002,0.0113385,0.000312263,0.00006481489,0.6663515,0.32107848,0.000011941428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004796728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00592357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03032228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00893358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044617644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064817905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150220751","doi":"10.7202/1006668ar","title":"Metaphors and Models in Legal Theory","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Assertion; Rhetorical question; Epistemology; Domain (mathematical analysis); Computer science; Linguistics; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.016763693877430014,"score_gpt":0.23630426470137406,"score_spread":0.21954057082394404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150220751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03378145,0.03305934,0.2735949,0.14658967,0.001999243,0.00013805309,0.0003284355,0.00037245307,0.5101365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91794807,0.009146116,0.051127397,0.0051665064,0.0010134603,0.00044198867,0.00019704505,0.00013360228,0.014825834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99375916,0.0045019444,0.00019596894,0.00045081842,0.0008044985,0.0002876812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99357927,0.004699507,0.0003957512,0.0005651967,0.00039397454,0.00036633303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005926657,0.0009469399,0.0009684551,0.0049586417,0.0045005884,0.009464759,0.0023659663,0.0048026866,0.0067757075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009074814,0.0005728536,0.0011289336,0.0035913545,0.03867011,0.018699508,0.0045617316,0.0052354704,0.001119213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010969154,0.0000029867515,0.000016706299,0.000011214433,0.0000011575421,0.0000137866755,0.0004861621,0.00019363234,0.0000059307627,0.99840564,0.0003670572,0.0004945794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037281147,0.0000029013552,0.000015358872,0.000028580973,9.2857476e-7,0.000018314651,0.00041405053,0.0006865307,0.000008486934,0.99093306,0.0078845015,0.0000035203896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035812757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024025308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009464759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066825124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030950382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04848528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152190582","doi":"10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030719","title":"Disentangling Law: The Practice of Bracketing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annual Review of Law and Social Science","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Bracketing (phenomenology); Framing (construction); Categorization; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Ontic; Focus (optics); Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.014665848652081119,"score_gpt":0.3574987836192763,"score_spread":0.3428329349671952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152190582","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027609805,0.010455074,0.68753654,0.045956746,0.0009572039,0.00019723785,0.000066040695,0.0003783312,0.226843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80173564,0.005423795,0.17118369,0.0050625135,0.0008040451,0.00066094915,0.00007376684,0.0004473752,0.014608288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.972741,0.020922981,0.0006628088,0.0024323764,0.0022127698,0.00102804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686282,0.0237951,0.0022168132,0.0034844596,0.0012270645,0.0006483644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024881033,0.0012274921,0.0015047322,0.0068072123,0.009465225,0.016459443,0.003744928,0.005571959,0.0063654915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037515204,0.0010973284,0.0012956632,0.004581286,0.09248893,0.034321405,0.015975246,0.009450768,0.0011548613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042250076,0.000005020576,0.00015157841,0.00002888905,0.000003657252,0.00004360781,0.015538409,0.00011089882,0.00006934599,0.9766128,0.0006234883,0.006807973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004865175,0.000009729585,0.000081859514,0.00014903837,0.000007361983,0.000068753325,0.0049714153,0.00070385536,0.00024382609,0.9545992,0.03914616,0.00001404051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006249649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050131087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024881033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064715203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006721732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13158506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152257874","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00319_3.x","title":"<i>Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory</i> . By Bruno Latour. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2005. Pp. 316. $39.95 cloth.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Sociology; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.03072674332222837,"score_gpt":0.30897084870865427,"score_spread":0.2782441053864259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152257874","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003674051,0.82064754,0.025981592,0.09603266,0.01097038,0.0000485666,0.0002810818,0.0002461429,0.045424692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026785405,0.78373206,0.02861556,0.028425138,0.021516886,0.0003345854,0.0005004438,0.00045854948,0.10963135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833834,0.000857376,0.000094663104,0.00021146087,0.00040078541,0.000097360404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672556,0.0024396684,0.00024155849,0.00012215698,0.00028629208,0.00018481162],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003372281,0.0017832646,0.001258646,0.004241446,0.0016494801,0.005059312,0.0019298053,0.0037408755,0.01710817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047334367,0.0012465257,0.001107176,0.0042209337,0.008780208,0.01319833,0.0020475695,0.0058323834,0.007902785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001662058,0.000016187389,0.0002460807,0.0009268969,0.000043612312,0.00010704493,0.00097089936,0.0006026063,0.00012813396,0.19357538,0.68542945,0.117937125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038518083,0.000012894801,0.00042614416,0.000834306,0.000008964926,0.00026316047,0.00044252584,0.00043654663,0.000077755074,0.21118475,0.7862874,0.000021810807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006451323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014082477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041615856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022003057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05723256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153844509","doi":"10.1007/s11417-008-9062-3","title":"Corruption and the Secret of Law: A Legal Anthropological Perspective","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Criminology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":220,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Language change; Political science; Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Geometry","score_opus":0.04808163149067929,"score_gpt":0.35411985343061697,"score_spread":0.3060382219399377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153844509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18221815,0.019610332,0.020717548,0.25392488,0.0008024184,0.000083678686,0.00013047428,0.000042855376,0.5224697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899156,0.002587211,0.0010622867,0.0025349231,0.00035608775,0.000019372354,0.000012795066,0.00001654949,0.0034951058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661875,0.002458802,0.0000761091,0.00016686687,0.0002974644,0.00038193475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906419,0.0073014903,0.00078391656,0.0003642609,0.0005141369,0.0003942739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050281514,0.00037242763,0.0004882086,0.0035232995,0.0061743967,0.012714415,0.0014422231,0.007048794,0.0037378964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007152582,0.00042479998,0.00032919788,0.0023324592,0.06944742,0.013516125,0.0032567098,0.0053202133,0.00020866713],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047346252,0.000018852617,0.00038627963,0.000018576182,0.000002234321,0.000098461154,0.012059412,0.00011745828,0.00003906893,0.9855794,0.0006407515,0.0010348846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015347372,0.000025284773,0.0010414331,0.0002007338,0.000009512358,0.00029898243,0.04157947,0.00083011796,0.00018272908,0.9089591,0.04683727,0.000020079555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006166282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006414163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012714415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033408392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040231147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026591778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158193244","doi":"10.5539/ach.v6n2p134","title":"Bai Sri Su Khwan: Spirit Blessing in North-eastern Thailand","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Culture and History","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ceremony; Blessing; Focus group; Participant observation; Ethnic group; Traditional medicine; Geography; Sociology; Gender studies; Psychology; Ethnology; Socioeconomics; Anthropology; Archaeology; Medicine","score_opus":0.014283061781490018,"score_gpt":0.23614193076133672,"score_spread":0.2218588689798467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158193244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992894,0.00033695617,0.0002136697,0.00034834028,0.00001674751,0.000038112994,0.000029203804,0.000007045396,0.0061160587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739254,0.00036735376,0.00015583244,0.00008221753,0.0000056592894,0.00002767805,0.000019688616,0.0000061587625,0.0019427909],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862134,0.00085314707,0.000057990484,0.00007993793,0.00017595277,0.000211653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764603,0.0011310519,0.00046234488,0.00008628374,0.00014473859,0.0005294333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013938885,0.00031704298,0.0003228687,0.00067450735,0.005518755,0.002933307,0.0005407252,0.00050356664,0.0025630204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022567185,0.00033764384,0.0001788865,0.0015059148,0.005166317,0.0014714075,0.0026009516,0.001183437,0.00016073561],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022737417,0.000017489583,0.008626752,0.00021252492,0.0000055265514,0.0022636182,0.9825587,0.000032906122,0.0012888025,0.00087462226,0.00041036334,0.003686064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014074107,0.00003277264,0.008251472,0.00007139727,0.000003419188,0.0004832144,0.9846972,0.00003394083,0.00016104482,0.00007297959,0.0061832336,0.00000792345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013641775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03753855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013641775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022637523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029617993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027124763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158506545","doi":"10.1111/1467-9655.12073","title":"The continuous and discontinuous person: two dimensions of ethical life","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Personhood; Ideology; Dimension (graph theory); Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Environmental ethics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.031096221475865393,"score_gpt":0.3179324919409455,"score_spread":0.28683627046508015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158506545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2983754,0.008642857,0.10284819,0.064926594,0.000547238,0.00010321144,0.00005565716,0.000089001405,0.5244118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98626626,0.00066657044,0.0073739076,0.0012385645,0.00009180919,0.000054670993,0.000009588485,0.000016221953,0.0042823674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99001735,0.00748319,0.00020893963,0.0005165682,0.0011084446,0.0006656045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955193,0.0025241529,0.00055709755,0.00057833537,0.0002695829,0.0005514974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056800037,0.0003312638,0.0003100584,0.0014308814,0.0040750736,0.009420822,0.0009940265,0.0034337984,0.0017665732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066377986,0.00028138707,0.0002827373,0.0008128789,0.061107457,0.00956696,0.007842851,0.0048680413,0.00026408673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011420974,0.000010264805,0.00036759258,0.000015555843,0.0000017268121,0.00007259374,0.026453275,0.00005645573,0.00011073447,0.96732014,0.00045778736,0.005122391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001564075,0.000042599448,0.0009960085,0.00019175558,0.0000041835924,0.0005907039,0.043358818,0.0005616822,0.0003176532,0.9072574,0.046639267,0.000024304538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075932895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007074043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009420822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030021472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026681202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030039132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159606976","doi":"10.1177/1743872109355555","title":"Law and the Foucauldian Wild West in Michael Cimino’s <i>Heaven’s Gate</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Heaven; Lawlessness; Narrative; State (computer science); Law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Theology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.014299773163876399,"score_gpt":0.2373610901513585,"score_spread":0.2230613169874821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159606976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08688512,0.018261895,0.002429693,0.14714867,0.0012972403,0.000024946923,0.0000240913,0.000033764103,0.7438947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9091983,0.00482035,0.00082379807,0.008247461,0.00038145,0.00003279171,0.0000070933147,0.00004965336,0.07643916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993273,0.00043421792,0.000009139063,0.00006193434,0.000078022604,0.00008933297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929786,0.00048556764,0.000049879967,0.000043053264,0.0000426221,0.000080896425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012682894,0.00026543444,0.00016177101,0.0007886404,0.008658999,0.0061607966,0.00050216913,0.0020279614,0.003174185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002327789,0.00021529442,0.00009555568,0.0006865927,0.024900185,0.005464196,0.0019345548,0.0038828459,0.00027323252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018029827,0.000015597607,0.0001998393,0.000028303233,0.0000015100089,0.00029895687,0.10038341,0.000049821938,0.00023278153,0.8654145,0.024756897,0.008600336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016756869,0.00002626033,0.0011623366,0.0003194896,0.000005527995,0.00023063921,0.08313246,0.0002194387,0.00060571806,0.19879553,0.7154656,0.00002030292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017446341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033995118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017446341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057861605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018024722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041981757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160662707","doi":"10.1177/1741659013493916","title":"Documentary noir in the city of fear: Feminicide, impunity and grassroots communication in Ciudad Juarez","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crime Media Culture An International Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Impunity; Narrative; Mainstream; Context (archaeology); Criminology; State (computer science); Politics; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Gender studies; Law; History; Art","score_opus":0.028674616706396445,"score_gpt":0.3494409629480791,"score_spread":0.32076634624168265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160662707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74251,0.013551629,0.0011165529,0.05131142,0.0009980882,0.000035477035,0.0000765713,0.00005212256,0.19034818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907025,0.0017073309,0.0001968226,0.0009512203,0.00021168891,0.000014687074,0.000016675904,0.000018541572,0.0061805453],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873275,0.0008397348,0.000018327253,0.00009527373,0.00012028462,0.00019368045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976915,0.0016056969,0.00028892097,0.00011107635,0.00013724722,0.00016554716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018045513,0.00047136415,0.0002462453,0.0010321003,0.010124733,0.006474817,0.00095426425,0.0023081275,0.003161553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036601368,0.00026403714,0.00014670508,0.0007498997,0.013083592,0.0028662279,0.0035766147,0.0032477041,0.00011838553],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012705736,0.00008664757,0.0034825043,0.00028336476,0.000022090548,0.002452189,0.8245639,0.000119692864,0.001568515,0.12392036,0.019401807,0.023971895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003061838,0.00010455894,0.013371108,0.00073709554,0.00004254194,0.000918209,0.6370305,0.00022911835,0.0016304998,0.008069655,0.3377908,0.000045302546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025517812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05042481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025517812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050240736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014447826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050738573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161535843","doi":"10.12927/cjnl.2002.19153","title":"Pont du Gard Forum, \"Let's Get Real\" - When Silence Makes a Difference","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing leadership","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Psychology; Political science; Nursing; Sociology; Philosophy; Medicine; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.1671059598054707,"score_gpt":0.292421198339611,"score_spread":0.1253152385341403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161535843","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011777309,0.009133121,0.0005426963,0.9177359,0.049569782,0.00004047701,0.00008502363,0.00007612782,0.021639157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041276947,0.004450165,0.00088564836,0.78777,0.018453442,0.00018795668,0.00007575474,0.00027059918,0.14662956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99217755,0.0039212927,0.00034617813,0.00072451716,0.0016895034,0.0011409501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97814834,0.01573557,0.00063415227,0.0005127428,0.001901997,0.003067208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070427363,0.0009317807,0.0008095453,0.00078226416,0.015978927,0.013859294,0.002689938,0.045836363,0.01740915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05282539,0.000594627,0.0007946134,0.0007077995,0.009120771,0.010474432,0.0062573296,0.043451954,0.003719911],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038896746,0.000026981354,0.0001651176,0.00008588299,0.000010358215,0.00022231507,0.0064763865,0.000025661535,0.00021244388,0.03991031,0.94090706,0.011918625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003277652,0.000019078612,0.0005795364,0.00034264041,0.000011964941,0.00007478531,0.010876988,0.000058074307,0.00021045591,0.008248542,0.9795122,0.000032977245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038812626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08816586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045836363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005671739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011024992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07717347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161726007","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2012.01.1","title":"Law/Culture: Power, Politics and the Political","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Politics; Power (physics); Epistemology; Scholarship; Interpretation (philosophy); Dialectic; Law; Context (archaeology); Discipline; Economic Justice; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.04865723955179949,"score_gpt":0.36238612503338075,"score_spread":0.31372888548158123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161726007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.096349515,0.026384082,0.020496534,0.09090729,0.00079334126,0.00005005986,0.000055864934,0.00004415337,0.7649193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98075837,0.003947513,0.0015656449,0.003384876,0.00025971985,0.000038676022,0.000011003435,0.000026182784,0.010008103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601173,0.0026470348,0.0000927445,0.00027993065,0.00050424,0.00046430243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974795,0.0013704136,0.00035371908,0.00020849574,0.00020970376,0.00037812756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032174534,0.00037246666,0.00040658357,0.0015514325,0.006535963,0.014750074,0.0009971044,0.0030442856,0.0042029503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041184067,0.00023848054,0.0002356053,0.001997533,0.06289858,0.009403861,0.0051748157,0.0036841913,0.00046286752],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004351416,0.000007985516,0.0003410169,0.000027712158,0.0000026524087,0.000057125322,0.01312791,0.00007108541,0.0000740969,0.98138404,0.0008839938,0.0040181363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007993281,0.000025782701,0.0013418281,0.00029057785,0.000008865044,0.00016692004,0.035432037,0.0003340076,0.00033345015,0.84085876,0.12117897,0.000020832249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005362373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049612042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014750074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039318893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041818568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028528035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162271661","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-4469.2010.01228.x","title":"Colonial Traditions, Co‐optations, and Mi'kmaq Legal Consciousness","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Innocence; Law; Colonialism; Indigenization; Legal consciousness; Legitimacy; Political science; Legal culture; Complicity; Criminalization; Sociology; Economic Justice; Criminology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.0827582206288735,"score_gpt":0.3385608229802799,"score_spread":0.2558026023514064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162271661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9362737,0.0013415779,0.00013794575,0.006261964,0.000039145096,0.00002469811,0.000022631688,0.0000056350523,0.05589268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99578345,0.00034972085,0.00006296176,0.00044641783,0.0000064501373,0.0000055439195,0.000005915266,0.0000027500616,0.003336896],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974784,0.00050997705,0.00008615874,0.0001991794,0.00059316837,0.0011331461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99591905,0.0011392715,0.0009736318,0.0002185511,0.0008020292,0.00094748224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024379534,0.00014663948,0.00025079338,0.0014171611,0.02234362,0.0056596217,0.000809514,0.00078156195,0.003406031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007891484,0.0002633912,0.00010250277,0.0021367893,0.023210337,0.0017754904,0.005377555,0.002973323,0.0001232074],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004380218,0.00003367265,0.046411198,0.00008613107,0.000010979365,0.0010555068,0.8350978,0.000033754317,0.00067673845,0.09669622,0.0022194905,0.01763474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001761254,0.000048457798,0.133077,0.00033492158,0.000018315855,0.00051879825,0.7786976,0.000097951124,0.00039788842,0.0077624405,0.07898444,0.000044538207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71026456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.834941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28973544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032281782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023775192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5828835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165253292","doi":"10.3138/utlj.63.3.0301-2","title":"THE OVER-CRIMINALIZATION OF PERSONS WITH HIV","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Exceptionalism; Harm; Criminology; Sexual assault; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Psychology; Medicine; Poison control; Environmental health; History; Virology; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.008283993410580115,"score_gpt":0.21478927099888664,"score_spread":0.20650527758830653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165253292","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70710427,0.0028279931,0.0014329666,0.054871403,0.0004376246,0.000037004495,0.000036021578,0.00002909054,0.23322359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858618,0.0005124399,0.00017899858,0.008720463,0.000083463456,0.000008296986,0.000008030986,0.000005604548,0.004620984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949962,0.0018132568,0.0002802184,0.00041329535,0.0009585369,0.0015386224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617887,0.001096508,0.00080060516,0.00038994607,0.0005517123,0.0009823702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028990307,0.00014592921,0.00030889947,0.0006539137,0.011328602,0.003116131,0.00071306,0.0020327894,0.0013594637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007855399,0.00021350267,0.00024434345,0.00037958173,0.013776104,0.0018896061,0.005575051,0.004973649,0.00013554793],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003101708,0.00008158433,0.052137192,0.00007805066,0.000025549356,0.003730502,0.11198395,0.00022706315,0.001183319,0.74702895,0.016494796,0.06699793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037457117,0.00034518735,0.13900338,0.0014219065,0.00009847915,0.019305892,0.14249578,0.0019353479,0.004925665,0.15722512,0.53304064,0.00016515699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061571646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.105049916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061571646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002780938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006457971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12242657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166888294","doi":"10.21083/csieci.v2i1.81","title":"Deconstructin(g) Jazz Improvisation: Derrida and the Law of the Singular Event","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jazz; Improvisation; Law; Democracy; Literature; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Art; Visual arts; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.024968592012654094,"score_gpt":0.36291923293136713,"score_spread":0.337950640918713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166888294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18218528,0.0074570593,0.017072227,0.04920025,0.00068556116,0.00006227938,0.000053491214,0.00016970366,0.7431141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9753666,0.0006528621,0.0009728646,0.001381136,0.00017903038,0.00002365599,0.000010110428,0.00004459756,0.021369189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805164,0.000998615,0.000060803923,0.00035841914,0.0002584705,0.00027210356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978987,0.0013583655,0.00016569368,0.0002714233,0.00020175682,0.00010398018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024212545,0.00035630152,0.00032723628,0.0013493288,0.0068726246,0.009810303,0.0011837877,0.0034123268,0.002938867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004378263,0.00017277309,0.00033853925,0.00066464394,0.041924607,0.0061728726,0.0052154576,0.0035696304,0.0004787447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010951702,0.0000053712834,0.00025174554,0.000023177414,0.000001719436,0.00019642364,0.04264543,0.0000795482,0.00012471451,0.95119804,0.001919111,0.0035438826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023250077,0.000034780125,0.0015759729,0.00023146396,0.000011660164,0.0005681697,0.0669127,0.00085033773,0.0016162804,0.5149802,0.4131581,0.00003708548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014318593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01658651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014318593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007417808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024436924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053820252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168208935","doi":"10.7202/1014283ar","title":"Communiquer le droit : le média et le message","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01004725402582201,"score_gpt":0.2428663696861869,"score_spread":0.2328191156603649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168208935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059651174,0.029587876,0.04368615,0.14510852,0.004807565,0.00015898362,0.00041826325,0.00017600684,0.71640545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81515807,0.01582808,0.009375921,0.01864797,0.003103758,0.00027170195,0.00018149048,0.00035103248,0.137082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955831,0.0026969288,0.00012297889,0.00046104618,0.0008119131,0.0003240439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924305,0.0053625186,0.0006361568,0.0005507275,0.0007318075,0.0002882756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030776935,0.000667456,0.00039125624,0.0020338432,0.005645543,0.014304701,0.001422928,0.004896887,0.019044485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010653395,0.00029464514,0.00045007508,0.0019819206,0.018306255,0.016402632,0.0050881654,0.005550967,0.002546638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005017259,0.00001708993,0.000722247,0.0002596381,0.000010853565,0.00024738174,0.06744842,0.00014544057,0.00049144204,0.9043402,0.009532475,0.016734574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019999174,0.00005019963,0.0022960722,0.0010984645,0.00002522396,0.0004922458,0.06104811,0.00047970333,0.0012499806,0.12872738,0.8044526,0.000060027774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010588852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010632874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019044485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048494213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003441826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06371015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169356987","doi":"","title":"Some Internal Points of View in the Study of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law and literature; Law; Epistemology; Action (physics); Sociology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.012079080920561413,"score_gpt":0.296019409912467,"score_spread":0.2839403289919056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169356987","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008469606,0.26975477,0.06495684,0.27900934,0.010243516,0.000055260218,0.00012231123,0.00009263563,0.36729577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58781,0.22928123,0.026775744,0.094291575,0.02863204,0.0007116476,0.0002751196,0.00043885817,0.031783827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821844,0.011212549,0.00060107146,0.0014838143,0.0037264368,0.0007916495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98619384,0.0101262145,0.00085983344,0.001149025,0.0012047433,0.00046631275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013839268,0.00085622934,0.0011491358,0.0055632335,0.006129037,0.019470463,0.0026345267,0.0063809846,0.003411362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019847987,0.000601319,0.001193712,0.005473538,0.055777706,0.01713453,0.007177375,0.014569374,0.00097003515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002541594,0.000008431769,0.00013929923,0.00010819447,0.000004901804,0.000014754416,0.0019144104,0.00005914726,0.000033240838,0.99032545,0.0023987917,0.0049908767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007546596,0.000018782535,0.00046108323,0.0012110147,0.000010614126,0.000059502934,0.0027968674,0.0002601488,0.00012359089,0.8814746,0.11356486,0.000011281817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019420998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016107016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019470463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056758495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073189974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171064699","doi":"10.1111/j.1548-744x.2009.01020.x","title":"Laws of the Street","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"City & Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Argument (complex analysis); Scholarship; Intersection (aeronautics); Order (exchange); Space (punctuation); Urban space; Sociology; Law; Political science; Urban studies; SAINT; Law and economics; Regional science; Geography; History; Cartography; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.02154192781521612,"score_gpt":0.28844663463871884,"score_spread":0.2669047068235027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171064699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08470435,0.004857955,0.00728282,0.026535805,0.00026326574,0.000051706345,0.00029706466,0.000061785446,0.87594527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97178936,0.0011076367,0.00057270506,0.0008062929,0.000071148206,0.000031936674,0.00004870941,0.000016411646,0.025555825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970595,0.001398165,0.000108918015,0.0003495866,0.00064405845,0.00043967992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761605,0.00088082417,0.00034463088,0.00040646034,0.0005396733,0.00021234443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019635707,0.0002082227,0.00022703796,0.0011778442,0.007263032,0.008703568,0.00065659184,0.0012114224,0.0065221805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036492136,0.00023174386,0.00014988313,0.0015529328,0.041556925,0.0026959353,0.003107256,0.0015507592,0.00039549996],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017041851,0.0000012349344,0.00045588426,0.000010001009,9.14076e-7,0.000026896607,0.011874319,0.00007871664,0.000035915175,0.983055,0.002781116,0.0016781525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007822558,0.000017985354,0.0048529436,0.00034070353,0.000012478006,0.00012378335,0.034928504,0.00043468704,0.00033611179,0.27406007,0.6848685,0.00001631985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12067706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1480754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12067706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013154657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010244139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23994929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171115201","doi":"10.1111/jaac.12026_3","title":"Leddy, Thomas. The Extraordinary in the Ordinary: The Aesthetics of Everyday Life. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press, 2012, 275 pp., $32.95 paper.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history; Everyday life; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01895726238616082,"score_gpt":0.2679291763672861,"score_spread":0.24897191398112525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171115201","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005143904,0.9098216,0.00084650633,0.037625026,0.0040327157,0.000022274071,0.0005777733,0.0001272933,0.0464324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020117253,0.78683126,0.0016676511,0.0063145626,0.003396084,0.00006987931,0.00044158215,0.00028439917,0.18087734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994311,0.00011206734,0.00005232617,0.000053487314,0.00028114842,0.0000698295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982691,0.0006761566,0.00009591664,0.00006225751,0.0006489268,0.0002476696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010367967,0.0015373192,0.0008236918,0.0035829588,0.0033559501,0.003843999,0.0018351838,0.0029200078,0.056369994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031048332,0.0010440203,0.00049299723,0.004601639,0.0028820618,0.010379608,0.0019501185,0.0039974693,0.024507714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034848803,0.000010362209,0.00027208863,0.00046315626,0.000006531313,0.0000842103,0.0018210306,0.000046190373,0.00011009059,0.0060450854,0.89236265,0.09874369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012146609,0.000010953514,0.0023318355,0.0015057708,0.000015876285,0.00024509613,0.0034133506,0.00003866813,0.00013566214,0.009369329,0.98290354,0.000017853252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08311368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19364463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08311368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038185094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00403891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1885764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177584073","doi":"","title":"Introduction To Indigenous Law Symposium Transcripts","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Syracuse journal of international law and commerce","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.010989153106134818,"score_gpt":0.27510974923049664,"score_spread":0.26412059612436184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177584073","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034130916,0.0049754265,0.0019967104,0.076778576,0.08512528,0.0014230218,0.0048445296,0.0008035627,0.8206399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014729602,0.0035866294,0.0020158482,0.016285954,0.016374022,0.0013851253,0.0028130198,0.00064363156,0.9421661],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673575,0.00080022844,0.00015758986,0.00028789998,0.0012673201,0.00075118284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99448144,0.0012703885,0.00017511075,0.0002296179,0.0021587247,0.0016848149],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034728632,0.0005906102,0.00061426,0.003519217,0.01041533,0.005615873,0.002056572,0.0033573778,0.3184929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009869776,0.0005276077,0.0007436586,0.0030526477,0.001254199,0.0030856172,0.006490031,0.00532502,0.081769794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002223463,0.000053287007,0.00006492612,0.00017033135,9.5067674e-7,0.00019803208,0.0035456438,0.000021278702,0.00030654002,0.0071956813,0.9747459,0.013675035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026193627,0.0000089270015,0.0003204726,0.00009473902,5.64297e-7,0.000037500664,0.0018824284,0.000008529952,0.000041190113,0.0005140115,0.99708384,0.000005275216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017919695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04152455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3184929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053335335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074437778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9720872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2179177954","doi":"10.1093/icon/mow042","title":"The harms of remedial discretion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Remedial education; Discretion; Business; Remedial action; Actuarial science; Political science; Law; Environmental remediation","score_opus":0.014720302363108987,"score_gpt":0.31319875985039086,"score_spread":0.29847845748728186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2179177954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07036504,0.012119861,0.08630263,0.32136708,0.0019651186,0.00017312488,0.00019043464,0.00044058877,0.5070762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93976116,0.0017778995,0.008180388,0.029337399,0.0013306381,0.00015987734,0.000041888976,0.00016381909,0.01924681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95532864,0.015572503,0.0018560608,0.0061821067,0.01719352,0.003867094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9447946,0.029704956,0.0037347947,0.014460214,0.005654941,0.0016505022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034246776,0.000672723,0.0011382235,0.0020949796,0.008440808,0.0087349815,0.0031684148,0.010071162,0.0055088825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06519162,0.00064123666,0.0014715111,0.0010409207,0.050529514,0.014488879,0.010116549,0.018455604,0.0011851833],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014977406,0.000015122654,0.00024724874,0.00002495926,0.000009620084,0.000077127705,0.0013621337,0.00025517488,0.0001876497,0.9885373,0.0023590336,0.006909709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004621925,0.000036972222,0.0006261404,0.00023446073,0.000023818056,0.00022437227,0.0009700868,0.0008422507,0.00059957587,0.91960585,0.07673416,0.000056092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071660383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060636285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034246776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063528423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010289112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1811164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2180620674","doi":"10.18740/s41s37","title":"The Law is a White Dog: How Legal Rituals Make and Unmake Persons, by Colin Dayan","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socialist studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.023732460356937334,"score_gpt":0.31778125479978364,"score_spread":0.2940487944428463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2180620674","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004618148,0.09069556,0.0006246187,0.8132636,0.009287539,0.000028192799,0.00005022024,0.000024887791,0.081407204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19201767,0.10455579,0.0025398666,0.396004,0.0108176675,0.00028858776,0.0001155183,0.000436873,0.2932241],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951546,0.0031519022,0.000102633676,0.00039495234,0.0008003627,0.0003955294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923907,0.004831201,0.00029767046,0.00023601584,0.0010729324,0.0011715636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005030905,0.0009210356,0.00092900335,0.0011761463,0.024969306,0.016999846,0.0024183344,0.009484642,0.0069128475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013448896,0.00077775423,0.00055128144,0.0020487916,0.027680093,0.019816644,0.008036182,0.018386343,0.0018625745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028056871,0.000062194784,0.0004962497,0.00013208177,0.000012680857,0.00011168924,0.051088274,0.00007535178,0.00009064015,0.11818423,0.8074175,0.022300972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010710492,0.0000146148295,0.0011237513,0.000534931,0.000008655004,0.000113335314,0.07206791,0.00010394354,0.00010357908,0.030623725,0.8952551,0.000039711922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10040729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24582076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10040729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008547353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01421361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19964576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2183434810","doi":"10.14324/111.444.amps.2014v4i3.001","title":"Art, Architecture and the Law: The Architectural Project and the Legal Contract as Social Artefacts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Architecture_MPS","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Architecture; Politics; Space (punctuation); Constitution; Sociology; Law; Social contract; Public space; Symbol (formal); Visual arts; Art; Computer science; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.007252043497605216,"score_gpt":0.257838881365703,"score_spread":0.25058683786809777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2183434810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068778746,0.007061722,0.013651445,0.052472938,0.0005959181,0.00006053215,0.0000411339,0.00007919811,0.85725844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94246703,0.0014262244,0.0029459957,0.0018684056,0.00031012745,0.0001253407,0.000020230756,0.00010237525,0.0507344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863446,0.009717974,0.00023105434,0.0008533365,0.0018067518,0.0010463231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99198204,0.005056845,0.0005750304,0.0010713342,0.0005416329,0.0007731462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009288654,0.00075330614,0.00040506126,0.0023667407,0.030843358,0.024995057,0.002249695,0.0071503036,0.00964047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008553505,0.00064226304,0.00039314583,0.0027842857,0.19678237,0.016364811,0.013240087,0.006928821,0.0009802016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049365617,0.000009802903,0.0001611638,0.000012729648,0.0000010021441,0.0000689672,0.043724887,0.000084002466,0.00003086823,0.9500527,0.0027020646,0.0031467301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003092255,0.00003810284,0.0011721166,0.0003119517,0.0000057346965,0.0002936226,0.08681538,0.00063226273,0.00017763753,0.43789995,0.4725841,0.000038149414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045742616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0545897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045742616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01619227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009605835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117483735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185925100","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1040","title":"Book Review: Disorderly People: Law and the Politics of Exlusion in Ontario, eds., Joe Hermer and Janet Mosher","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01031553704967533,"score_gpt":0.28697485036962983,"score_spread":0.2766593133199545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185925100","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018672989,0.9401808,0.00006620437,0.033913612,0.0130547965,0.000018624109,0.00025026023,0.000013571635,0.012315409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025826008,0.9268977,0.00011404557,0.010409336,0.010384419,0.000040038798,0.00029194303,0.000026594935,0.049253363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990896,0.00011752341,0.00005516559,0.000073267176,0.00057813234,0.00008640117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958276,0.0014185655,0.00031096602,0.00006583022,0.0020386404,0.00033833872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011585144,0.0011019832,0.0018932807,0.0033612968,0.0021445416,0.0035857214,0.0018904759,0.0037400757,0.0241639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051685306,0.0006421932,0.000531002,0.009970565,0.0024972942,0.0026727265,0.001007857,0.002431468,0.005580558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007157477,0.0000031308628,0.00010600116,0.00070623617,0.0000067527194,0.000022450431,0.00013733369,0.000032600175,0.000018317445,0.0011405038,0.98015904,0.01766052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008976525,0.000006782018,0.001446598,0.0019556005,0.00002055984,0.00013773552,0.0002933749,0.000021745902,0.000017899532,0.00079730985,0.99528164,0.000011718376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45707738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8035383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5429226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018330753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024159132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9088338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2186001007","doi":"","title":"The Gift of Policing: Understanding Image and Reciprocity","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UWSpace (University of Waterloo)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Sociology; Epistemology; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01964564261851624,"score_gpt":0.24598014738488752,"score_spread":0.2263345047663713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2186001007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28975666,0.0076876776,0.06752698,0.06914408,0.0009782993,0.00015383413,0.000082194296,0.00013469408,0.5645357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99018,0.001170634,0.0032875277,0.0007038479,0.000094611656,0.000044243647,0.00001637463,0.000044359538,0.00445837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98976165,0.0076810457,0.00021248696,0.0005596327,0.0009736525,0.00081150944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99058783,0.0047250115,0.0016934114,0.0008358574,0.0009339094,0.0012239622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010878587,0.00050500414,0.0004005265,0.0029680496,0.007800968,0.011645945,0.0014860209,0.002823351,0.0041929856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020087456,0.0004142567,0.0004846504,0.0013039967,0.049379148,0.021996876,0.007889241,0.003591926,0.0005863718],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020697802,0.000020056712,0.0023404136,0.00004463768,0.0000045665015,0.00017181456,0.12319751,0.00021781729,0.000056394278,0.86230826,0.0014583347,0.010159533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028262228,0.00005631566,0.0023186975,0.0003250973,0.000013791575,0.0005606014,0.1347309,0.0019591083,0.00014313198,0.75458443,0.10523988,0.000039826344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077286237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047327178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011645945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00836476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00371638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06069094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187910830","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v8n4p9","title":"Modernising the Law of Murder and Manslaughter: Part 1","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Law; Criminology; Poison control; Political science; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Psychology; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.04367188184437722,"score_gpt":0.3148546481861031,"score_spread":0.2711827663417259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187910830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031317227,0.35179174,0.012346965,0.1476701,0.005669466,0.00032506807,0.0001668046,0.000100826364,0.45061183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47507578,0.27102262,0.016730543,0.06039518,0.016244836,0.0006532986,0.00026410277,0.00013975162,0.15947382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981489,0.0007605905,0.00009897088,0.00019506791,0.0005137184,0.00028273827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771273,0.0012331537,0.0004557946,0.00023090573,0.00025364678,0.000113790644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002910534,0.0006646316,0.00041148058,0.0018206977,0.0023132612,0.0036213929,0.0012104921,0.00792616,0.007825387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005609217,0.00047448688,0.000435868,0.0015116819,0.014849467,0.006819116,0.0035436957,0.0062240586,0.0009150334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024573805,0.0001276788,0.001051364,0.0007205677,0.000014895501,0.00021598845,0.0081127025,0.00041218087,0.0010493731,0.88784397,0.030939154,0.06948749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015934993,0.0001217314,0.006205428,0.0014589202,0.00001727953,0.0004523124,0.0025763768,0.0001741269,0.0013371039,0.21541719,0.77218634,0.000037267586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039531817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067074206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00792616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00397663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004118438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028852582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2191504182","doi":"10.4000/shakespeare.3479","title":"“Perfect Conscience”: Hamlet, Christopher St. German’s Doctor and Student, and the English Common Law","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Actes des congrès de la Société française Shakespeare","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Conscience; HAMLET (protein complex); German; Relation (database); Law; Hierarchy; Feudalism; Philosophy; Realm; Sociology; Political science; Literature; Art; Politics; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.023774542663172693,"score_gpt":0.33014374395449664,"score_spread":0.30636920129132394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2191504182","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06706188,0.04296518,0.0019705545,0.4463846,0.0042890324,0.000021548412,0.0000787333,0.00003432296,0.4371942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8100771,0.0060772896,0.0004080883,0.04858029,0.0016148612,0.000027968985,0.00003165679,0.000026791826,0.13315596],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986339,0.00070060755,0.000029863762,0.00010986668,0.00025533978,0.0002703781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988709,0.00067273964,0.000102574224,0.000042155192,0.00012549525,0.00018620084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015227165,0.0002191021,0.00017591307,0.0006477124,0.0053046364,0.0049897144,0.00047125522,0.0030693114,0.0033369516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003293701,0.00014173763,0.00010667109,0.00066373055,0.011641319,0.0030588007,0.0018751759,0.0026447289,0.0004277776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001410663,0.000016339682,0.00041539522,0.00003370667,0.0000016769676,0.000303383,0.026415398,0.000058630725,0.00006580334,0.8064318,0.15757546,0.008668324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014818895,0.000019122252,0.0017362963,0.00023266496,0.0000028057445,0.0002442758,0.01875871,0.00013403042,0.00013994722,0.098061636,0.8806394,0.000016295966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027767336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043725364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027767336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057632895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003762984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055211425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192283895","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i1.4491","title":"HLA Hart, Lon Fuller and the Ghosts of Legal Interpretation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Human leukocyte antigen; Philosophy; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Medicine; Linguistics; Immunology","score_opus":0.014425546957771136,"score_gpt":0.3172044303791481,"score_spread":0.30277888342137693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192283895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0572639,0.046550892,0.0039254967,0.32574388,0.0038692676,0.000038022226,0.000093057366,0.00007658195,0.56243885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8541287,0.013902861,0.0013377413,0.02140998,0.0020065669,0.000040579518,0.00003400662,0.00009131053,0.10704833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976164,0.0012998681,0.00004675559,0.0001602188,0.00057762355,0.0002991315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967822,0.0022702517,0.00028627558,0.000115114795,0.0002567269,0.00028937234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022581588,0.00026950357,0.00028571673,0.0007360725,0.009876441,0.009485712,0.00061192905,0.0031527772,0.0047594807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052594403,0.00031869914,0.00012467452,0.00071875483,0.021646747,0.008212947,0.0022408725,0.0050057624,0.0005061274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024479206,0.000014009155,0.00022347432,0.000057175523,0.0000027864182,0.00025702882,0.04686184,0.00005366981,0.00009146073,0.8636065,0.07992755,0.008879943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016319787,0.0000234918,0.00080572604,0.00031653032,0.000006962153,0.00031944842,0.042241193,0.00011446714,0.0001811386,0.17987248,0.7760733,0.000028919088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029498467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051594205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029498467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008894344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050389264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06453323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194506680","doi":"","title":"'Passing Through the Mirror': Dead Man , Legal Pluralism and the De-Territorialization of the West","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Indigenous; Realm; Frontier; Legal pluralism; Scholarship; Premise; Law; Negotiation; Sociology; Embodied cognition; Aesthetics; Legal realism; History; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.016115698618956616,"score_gpt":0.2674581408089046,"score_spread":0.251342442189948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2194506680","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52380264,0.006173881,0.009929085,0.029662598,0.00034398542,0.00002652437,0.000022659646,0.000054243275,0.4299844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98968166,0.0004903906,0.0004921778,0.00043642233,0.000026011337,0.000004711794,0.000003252678,0.00001734802,0.008848098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980209,0.001321189,0.00004302934,0.00020102647,0.00016923735,0.00024467497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905986,0.00047404622,0.00011618953,0.0001554008,0.00006556644,0.00012883866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002194506,0.00024308446,0.00030000106,0.00065304025,0.008822385,0.008227459,0.0007285376,0.0017462341,0.0025847587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002894446,0.0002137746,0.00014507817,0.00048509016,0.039347786,0.008318248,0.0045106276,0.0029018375,0.00022734316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001876433,0.000010839164,0.00040967367,0.000032267995,0.0000027019437,0.00030143815,0.3143617,0.00004217182,0.000529989,0.67470324,0.0012647848,0.008322454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015774907,0.00008702336,0.0028114885,0.00028229554,0.000018758947,0.001186168,0.4807483,0.0004896341,0.0019138132,0.2548222,0.25758952,0.000035044657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066388105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01133302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008822385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023075938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014320259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016742826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197798077","doi":"","title":"‘Access to Justice’ as Access to a Lawyer's Language","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Law; Meaning (existential); Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.014107859657886676,"score_gpt":0.35366999826257406,"score_spread":0.33956213860468737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197798077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052111212,0.0052160635,0.01650237,0.0481691,0.0007687917,0.000044744884,0.00009575453,0.00011829768,0.8769736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579453,0.0015813882,0.0027135953,0.0058117686,0.0007451813,0.000052298186,0.000049206123,0.00008086533,0.031020377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920494,0.0030275953,0.00041479082,0.00082183594,0.0023047684,0.0013816581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992376,0.0034606333,0.0009972751,0.0010508271,0.0012105904,0.0009046334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035864913,0.00029930202,0.0003941254,0.001935321,0.0052482653,0.012684713,0.0015689773,0.0049002273,0.009416396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0101837795,0.00023068502,0.00042006775,0.0015483607,0.041175924,0.01723302,0.008376761,0.0052069766,0.0010446013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061080814,0.000015204775,0.00026156835,0.00002632351,0.0000034540624,0.00009895875,0.023457862,0.000036724374,0.00019190497,0.969453,0.002083258,0.004365678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002090633,0.00006961954,0.0024724584,0.0003741277,0.000020608308,0.00060363335,0.023091344,0.0002479521,0.0005735627,0.6775694,0.29488185,0.00007449609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074877567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066042314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012684713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036726138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004108577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031500995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198147275","doi":"","title":"School of Life: Learned Law and the Scholastic Habitus","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholasticism; Habitus; Conceptualization; Sociology; Epistemology; Phenomenon; Flourishing; Lifeworld; Law; Social science; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.015447574149386436,"score_gpt":0.25447737385070907,"score_spread":0.23902979970132263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198147275","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3342936,0.0094140805,0.0076378305,0.13887791,0.0004971363,0.00005314299,0.00009630306,0.00010840116,0.5090215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922315,0.00083316857,0.0002557067,0.0019369264,0.00013126689,0.000011905759,0.000011942045,0.000013268678,0.004574295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977189,0.001423857,0.00006293572,0.00020927035,0.00031866098,0.00026640002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965552,0.0014318594,0.00060810253,0.00026892722,0.00028780944,0.0008480627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024371059,0.00016322143,0.0001697861,0.0009272078,0.0048812716,0.009403191,0.0005304453,0.0015446278,0.0032940533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053121094,0.00013144527,0.00013327149,0.0007250078,0.051171128,0.008166655,0.0054791574,0.0040040873,0.0004004608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013469579,0.000042257205,0.0020067855,0.000025687208,0.0000026701898,0.000082865874,0.062530085,0.00004802697,0.00007915093,0.9257381,0.0027635808,0.0066672685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003298743,0.0000862769,0.009679489,0.00024324344,0.000006339049,0.00031536727,0.07897887,0.0005199874,0.00036185564,0.66412884,0.24561046,0.000036336838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041474644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003638157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009403191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040131323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022643856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029117465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2199129917","doi":"","title":"Response: 'and it really was a kitten, after all'","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ANU Open Research (Australian National University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Kitten; Medicine; CATS; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.20245958247646426,"score_gpt":0.4165250045110725,"score_spread":0.21406542203460824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2199129917","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015578232,0.00061344774,0.00037983916,0.96327984,0.019984484,0.000035062425,0.00026138275,0.00014362176,0.013744504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008760157,0.00038624372,0.00023031287,0.91465235,0.0023505841,0.000062533894,0.00008385719,0.00009857103,0.07337542],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965448,0.0010207614,0.00019716854,0.0004776273,0.001129443,0.0006302363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931507,0.0024112347,0.00050140516,0.00021515074,0.0028097539,0.00091177603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030015833,0.00072591554,0.00081137294,0.0005627681,0.006768719,0.0037652869,0.0014731473,0.016474247,0.03564513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023643317,0.00053186493,0.00057795644,0.0006548233,0.0029646321,0.004008296,0.00375419,0.023415059,0.014911377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025658694,0.000006162692,0.0002103815,0.000035025885,0.0000023263801,0.00013114899,0.0019321006,0.000022390861,0.00014787796,0.0025607506,0.9930407,0.0018854439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012145335,0.000027252729,0.0010192593,0.00017325327,0.000005981802,0.00033806372,0.010058545,0.0000749419,0.00029088213,0.0017234107,0.9862303,0.000045894194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017545335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02525966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03564513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035102987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004247938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119244814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200219952","doi":"","title":"The Dignity of Law : The Legacy of Justice Louis LeBel","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03582819737618665,"score_gpt":0.30188279892883035,"score_spread":0.2660546015526437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200219952","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01144445,0.12771197,0.0010671226,0.6276927,0.012680611,0.000034849898,0.00012785783,0.00007362345,0.2191668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30920506,0.08904381,0.0018491743,0.17259249,0.007499072,0.000055439814,0.00012126758,0.00021260402,0.41942108],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966839,0.0007335168,0.000054156826,0.00030609712,0.001511869,0.00071036234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953056,0.001326593,0.00014989184,0.000092182476,0.0019835706,0.0011421401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023028795,0.00042695977,0.00046338385,0.0014967003,0.020014292,0.011474507,0.0010876734,0.003378733,0.0027162328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071369475,0.000305818,0.00022515966,0.0014690799,0.013777218,0.0027387831,0.0025638605,0.007885591,0.0007484708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020937672,0.000029929026,0.0010162413,0.00008461484,0.000010107488,0.00044488139,0.017948044,0.00017199854,0.00021757402,0.18638325,0.75572383,0.037948616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029329976,0.0000072313524,0.0007633494,0.00027648438,0.0000048962916,0.00014520626,0.009217847,0.00008530132,0.00012245553,0.010891711,0.97845113,0.000031429357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7000064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8066439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7000064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046778094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057564326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6035206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201384972","doi":"","title":"Homosexuality and the Law in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Docs.school Publications","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homosexuality; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.025182928351974707,"score_gpt":0.2790318784089577,"score_spread":0.253848950056983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201384972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3559983,0.051853403,0.0004953261,0.15549338,0.0014569652,0.00014906864,0.0019190555,0.000085725784,0.4325488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83732516,0.017542439,0.00037045803,0.009731156,0.00013422182,0.000033341952,0.00026757526,0.00003560451,0.13456003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962606,0.00024150015,0.00008311581,0.00019066049,0.0010025466,0.0022214614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945857,0.0007387115,0.00024975685,0.00008439376,0.0017485667,0.0025928533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015816474,0.0002778264,0.00056592125,0.002382285,0.030729469,0.009558339,0.0015590577,0.0032423802,0.021503616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005168864,0.00043857118,0.00039958488,0.004857703,0.0073534693,0.0014818226,0.0025828038,0.004338932,0.0007386833],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015960669,0.00021515353,0.07124524,0.0006064353,0.00008211117,0.0016625482,0.04770284,0.0012719986,0.0005055556,0.5564134,0.2010001,0.11913489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007906179,0.00006109281,0.14183822,0.001303838,0.00010453667,0.00045187568,0.086312234,0.0013380682,0.00042741254,0.020211834,0.74768597,0.00018581747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9990182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17255443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17255443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40436178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9597196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204469830","doi":"","title":"Teaching 'Indigenous Peoples and the Law' - Whose Law?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Indigenous; Political science; Statute; Legislation; Comparative law; Public law; Common law; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.00771982796027118,"score_gpt":0.25177866187367026,"score_spread":0.24405883391339908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2204469830","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23833409,0.023374122,0.0018315715,0.40293446,0.002099902,0.000034837925,0.000017935028,0.00006695419,0.3313061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93920785,0.01329165,0.0010198066,0.015385057,0.00055134477,0.000030820625,0.000009795788,0.0000151334725,0.030488594],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976907,0.0010838171,0.000044473425,0.0001124735,0.00040300767,0.0006656241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975095,0.0009829153,0.00022080327,0.0000972102,0.00026724942,0.00092235574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002658503,0.0001739638,0.00029565566,0.00068701326,0.00871868,0.007250302,0.00082290015,0.0021837188,0.0053313836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006710614,0.00017417144,0.00018913999,0.0007571818,0.01914208,0.00668602,0.0038240275,0.0041083856,0.00047847326],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012011059,0.00027826813,0.006429213,0.00031476974,0.000012761,0.0006843066,0.52289134,0.00010549837,0.0006618723,0.3504173,0.018634584,0.09955809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011274422,0.00009170268,0.013767878,0.0007395653,0.000017897832,0.0004869004,0.6269955,0.000116846284,0.0003288923,0.09983764,0.25758058,0.000025307838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06806086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12318426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06806086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059258034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013085309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13532943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2206475947","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511770678","title":"Law&amp;#39;s Cosmos","year":2010,"lang":"sl","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Narrative; Literature; Poetry; Law; Scholarship; Legal history; Philosophy; History; Art; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.025751905629573014,"score_gpt":0.2349097757335587,"score_spread":0.20915787010398568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2206475947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018245232,0.0049653444,0.000858036,0.004119728,0.00059271744,0.000017477645,0.00003661922,0.00006485328,0.9875206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09757976,0.005433732,0.0011716547,0.003313917,0.0006289978,0.000108419,0.0000657261,0.0000900153,0.89160776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996735,0.00010635257,0.000013505568,0.00006776169,0.00010205272,0.00003697391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981004,0.00007075529,0.000014623614,0.0000372395,0.000041283478,0.000026045209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003645673,0.00036022908,0.00021087362,0.0012664396,0.00300428,0.0047674514,0.0004911808,0.0018129135,0.02095003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010149233,0.00020547501,0.00018175434,0.0008643657,0.0068780105,0.0034193778,0.001742394,0.0022268794,0.0050339084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005657875,0.000012820058,0.00014303072,0.000056706154,0.0000013765706,0.00009276322,0.0025811836,0.000070877824,0.00012089158,0.8906392,0.07399928,0.032276142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027979825,0.0000074856043,0.00024366249,0.00012575189,0.0000012190139,0.00013474365,0.0010168331,0.00009224603,0.00008397086,0.0624271,0.935861,0.0000031899642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047826837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062737865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02095003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002947826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001932191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07008481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210338013","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v41i3.5228","title":"Why Legal History Matters","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal history; Project commissioning; Publishing; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0128029408878248,"score_gpt":0.22982842293614558,"score_spread":0.21702548204832078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210338013","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022883802,0.12586759,0.0005905539,0.8087694,0.005902359,0.000016060087,0.00007118072,0.000021687414,0.056472752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18603563,0.13123584,0.0007735736,0.6101393,0.013713163,0.000056215515,0.00019529555,0.00014498677,0.05770605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98351604,0.006675603,0.0008004129,0.0014285549,0.0052579064,0.0023214696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9627195,0.02290177,0.0020943996,0.0010396934,0.0088689225,0.0023757736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01606259,0.00030109135,0.000854712,0.0030186623,0.0066625825,0.011435123,0.00161389,0.011408316,0.009888232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05022538,0.0007664081,0.0005036905,0.0025080207,0.020744009,0.014995241,0.00313072,0.011225364,0.0026608394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017358785,0.000014957889,0.0008393905,0.00054743927,0.000028798064,0.00022723459,0.006500287,0.00011438807,0.00015753986,0.4952823,0.4649178,0.03135251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009217697,0.00000894658,0.0015849032,0.0011577422,0.000015071786,0.00015139558,0.0047889836,0.000059496135,0.000092332215,0.09993069,0.8921759,0.00002522836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12246003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15854244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12246003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016575346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02278958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24349451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2210556124","doi":"","title":"The Law of the Other: Exploring the Paradox of Legal Pluralism in Australian Native Title","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Legal pluralism; Common law; Precedent; Plaintiff; Pluralism (philosophy); Political science; Indigenous rights; High Court; Legal history; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Human rights; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03131528755828546,"score_gpt":0.2821979715816517,"score_spread":0.2508826840233663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2210556124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61496174,0.0037924717,0.0031836163,0.04737743,0.00018069557,0.00005555132,0.000022138636,0.000013250609,0.3304132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951441,0.00047872917,0.00025503928,0.0012174848,0.00005583439,0.000021643138,0.0000035538878,0.000005140598,0.0028183768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99179584,0.0049606785,0.00015377105,0.0007092236,0.0012248192,0.0011555739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985081,0.010833121,0.0013706126,0.00071067264,0.001003062,0.0010014103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012007197,0.00028953934,0.00073480775,0.0024941426,0.016896645,0.013322297,0.002625692,0.0065926192,0.0026735656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018357102,0.00053795864,0.00049498247,0.0020863127,0.060658645,0.015479474,0.010517065,0.00785751,0.00017630734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018283052,0.000033398966,0.0011461762,0.000049254202,0.0000062647523,0.000766188,0.17242488,0.00008020949,0.00017962621,0.82186747,0.00060815923,0.002820134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007437499,0.000104306695,0.012650082,0.00056412467,0.00004299354,0.00094463467,0.27925825,0.0020664686,0.00055083184,0.6491343,0.05453693,0.00007275437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049448248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046516452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049448248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012867575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057185683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09832084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211344831","doi":"","title":"The Plasticized Pregnant Woman and Legal Rights over Reproductive 'Material'","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Dimension (graph theory); Exhibition; Property (philosophy); Intellectual property; Human body; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Art; Epistemology; Computer science; Visual arts","score_opus":0.0067688679556328025,"score_gpt":0.2431828637958973,"score_spread":0.23641399584026448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211344831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12317125,0.008464104,0.0058879564,0.044401597,0.00067025947,0.000030092277,0.000040687206,0.00003513928,0.817299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9500188,0.0032687506,0.001068401,0.0033457563,0.00021565988,0.000025003163,0.00001213923,0.000024183866,0.042021375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920493,0.0005212472,0.000013441505,0.0000502287,0.000109259025,0.00010089286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990952,0.00064476806,0.00010866649,0.00006197531,0.00002468259,0.00006484219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009758078,0.00018490177,0.00011091663,0.00023564932,0.0028111823,0.0035527537,0.00037067165,0.0021344004,0.007818533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003288583,0.00013373526,0.00017478732,0.00020871186,0.022546256,0.002581389,0.0029783426,0.0022361171,0.0005536178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004643309,0.000021984517,0.0009843662,0.00007860137,0.000004632073,0.0017291213,0.14914857,0.00013314988,0.0011596517,0.8117244,0.007567163,0.02740193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013965163,0.00009126236,0.005285531,0.00084335177,0.000013589759,0.009016171,0.22524615,0.00023317008,0.002235136,0.16437365,0.5926098,0.000038203347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014113891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017661529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007818533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009050217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008275695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026155531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211511716","doi":"","title":"Adelaide's Blackstone","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originalism; Indigenous; Adjudication; Interpretation (philosophy); Legal history; Colonialism; Subject (documents); History; Criticism; Law; Meaning (existential); Genealogy; Political science; Constitutional law; Library science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01843750053590159,"score_gpt":0.2969981781741289,"score_spread":0.2785606776382273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211511716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012348208,0.042265747,0.0006080496,0.16041727,0.039175253,0.00004618,0.00024218822,0.00010717508,0.74478996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09642098,0.008056961,0.00045472474,0.034678727,0.003365357,0.000061284074,0.000058850386,0.000105602165,0.8567976],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986903,0.00035133178,0.000048068716,0.00030767158,0.0003876421,0.0002149115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988973,0.0004952904,0.000060725117,0.00008202141,0.00029974818,0.0001649177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091115583,0.00039991722,0.000283133,0.00086618727,0.0094571365,0.0058398,0.0005434777,0.0031489788,0.030793078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042863064,0.0002403331,0.00020470882,0.0005686155,0.0026965635,0.002479585,0.0031651258,0.005723703,0.0049061226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048629612,0.000023379964,0.00038593521,0.0002907929,0.000007099985,0.0005430655,0.010391186,0.00009646917,0.00072212983,0.18191458,0.7722866,0.033290185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.3208114e-7,0.00000238303,0.00012386683,0.00006328109,6.4158934e-7,0.000038415692,0.00078013504,0.000008943034,0.000091550384,0.0007349524,0.9981517,0.0000034735333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03027395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06979847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030793078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00426998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039387564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1030131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2211818096","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1046","title":"Spectacles of Emancipation: Reading Rights Differently in India's Legal Discourse","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Emancipation; Subaltern; Law; Human rights; Sociology; International human rights law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Fundamental rights; State (computer science); Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.016576411054739906,"score_gpt":0.3091881079901863,"score_spread":0.2926116969354464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2211818096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2656959,0.0071936864,0.008489999,0.13542588,0.0007653412,0.000044526474,0.00007942056,0.00016365455,0.5821416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926663,0.00078628905,0.00045557032,0.002343235,0.00015231108,0.000017885899,0.00001175102,0.000039899074,0.0035267624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98577166,0.010176712,0.00032331757,0.0006069778,0.0018093293,0.0013120839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98169976,0.014555443,0.00086284784,0.0012211577,0.0009906568,0.0006701269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01039183,0.0005671262,0.0006133868,0.0046514836,0.016073195,0.024774704,0.0021157758,0.0044538565,0.0025244746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014826968,0.0003599809,0.00053801585,0.0034016133,0.10920032,0.018296303,0.012248779,0.009727631,0.00039482152],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011337361,0.000011222161,0.00026654365,0.000040438117,0.0000044302915,0.00013362084,0.38849396,0.00008105433,0.00013262285,0.6066963,0.00085122866,0.0032771188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015953055,0.0000308169,0.0014306689,0.0004854611,0.000025995492,0.00026279668,0.50448066,0.00034721397,0.0006485011,0.32913777,0.16307713,0.000057051635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01654215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014206998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024774704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014204333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068395915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10306013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2213500113","doi":"","title":"'The Trap' in Law and Critique","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Realm; Meaning (existential); Witness; Appeal; Sociology; Tribunal; Economic Justice; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009736652711308904,"score_gpt":0.26337359010865774,"score_spread":0.2536369373973488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2213500113","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0050481115,0.07325909,0.013503982,0.4691595,0.009254148,0.000046145913,0.00006845754,0.00030755493,0.429353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6524991,0.02225723,0.009574308,0.078040466,0.010768781,0.0003901509,0.000107577034,0.0006967294,0.22566567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97551835,0.017989794,0.00039614525,0.0013166072,0.0035285805,0.0012504768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868618,0.007942296,0.0007031462,0.001965585,0.0016207892,0.000906314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014581133,0.0010102951,0.000854778,0.004481125,0.013433132,0.025506184,0.0025379972,0.011170807,0.008217773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029443957,0.00048022214,0.0006079652,0.003369236,0.09489952,0.020318976,0.009087652,0.013198804,0.0025672195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071996037,0.000009283772,0.00008378583,0.00005113716,0.0000029235425,0.00004989515,0.016210739,0.000027344928,0.000033921664,0.9242471,0.05171033,0.007566421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009290107,0.000014789083,0.00015718631,0.000515167,0.0000035321077,0.00010376221,0.01622291,0.00016052395,0.00007661869,0.4128811,0.5698442,0.000010873258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011970377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013377572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025506184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014420352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01455512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10462749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2214231715","doi":"","title":"Legal Rites: Abjection and the Criminal Regulation of Consensual Sex","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Disgust; CONTEST; Criminal law; Morality; Psychology; Legislature; Social psychology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Anger","score_opus":0.013644549067705843,"score_gpt":0.2691948199758542,"score_spread":0.25555027090814836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2214231715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33489075,0.008323467,0.0068471637,0.04281867,0.00036689287,0.000026399563,0.000020302648,0.000028268898,0.6066781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98646045,0.0012732339,0.00052549184,0.0020985182,0.00009614866,0.000017455317,0.000004860693,0.000011874059,0.009511953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995096,0.0032649913,0.00012795233,0.00034139887,0.0007408686,0.00042871927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99492234,0.002815711,0.0011105072,0.00035904147,0.0004478717,0.00034461098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039441944,0.00021799584,0.00023669955,0.0014645639,0.006632647,0.008439109,0.0008364394,0.0028541163,0.0024952115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063329535,0.000249252,0.0002720856,0.0006702793,0.05523968,0.0046943533,0.0056038657,0.003935824,0.00030136158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018333687,0.000038823448,0.0019110019,0.000041875595,0.0000057845527,0.00023420503,0.08552648,0.00007980304,0.0006353155,0.8991052,0.0010696098,0.011333703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002592886,0.00016920143,0.022443172,0.0007523619,0.000041049076,0.0009985857,0.15607566,0.0010482384,0.0029638263,0.5956946,0.2197006,0.00008674787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052856347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006391064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008439109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030211334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020473464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021919966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2214440074","doi":"","title":"Mabo in a World Perspective: Recognizing Aboriginal Title [Book Review]","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arena journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Project commissioning; Publishing; Government (linguistics); High Court; Colonialism; Politics; Law; Perspective (graphical); Resistance (ecology); Political science; Plan (archaeology); Sociology; History; Public administration; Philosophy; Art; Archaeology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.011908214476445713,"score_gpt":0.3340350231937694,"score_spread":0.3221268087173237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2214440074","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017086945,0.96139854,0.000078208555,0.01419736,0.0056441477,0.0000055693895,0.000017346121,0.0000074209916,0.018480513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031384535,0.94384706,0.00022022754,0.018632919,0.006133941,0.000024372746,0.000053319367,0.000018048024,0.027931597],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994759,0.00012646613,0.000026723988,0.000046940182,0.00026724255,0.000056781053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991574,0.000420888,0.000072976756,0.000019096182,0.00026076,0.00006890099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008498783,0.00041927383,0.000927594,0.0018195421,0.0015296289,0.0036728892,0.0009037059,0.0021428342,0.009100977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027496035,0.00031954795,0.0003566189,0.0033624843,0.002031514,0.0030608228,0.0012578921,0.002849006,0.002836499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018790086,0.000015432322,0.000197378,0.0028665822,0.00002520874,0.0002347313,0.0012534026,0.00006594836,0.00013636581,0.027624834,0.794031,0.17353033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021700762,0.0000067328906,0.0004153328,0.0017252513,0.000010624019,0.00018887136,0.00035736855,0.0000056292542,0.000015080477,0.0012244217,0.9960448,0.000003620067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018185185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04371658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018185185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017425027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00490049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03615868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2214690325","doi":"","title":"‘Leaving Normal’: Constructing the Family at the Movies and in Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Deviance (statistics); Popular culture; Supreme court; Hegemony; Law; Sociology; Criminal law; Family law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.00716399391878086,"score_gpt":0.245291589636478,"score_spread":0.23812759571769715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2214690325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6000159,0.003907394,0.006233908,0.03688613,0.00054467976,0.000035637877,0.0000658069,0.00005918513,0.3522514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932318,0.00040116254,0.00030701538,0.00069371215,0.000032529108,0.000005823122,0.000009457505,0.000013673778,0.005304775],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964401,0.002539777,0.00004207844,0.00021480901,0.00030911292,0.00045413632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847037,0.00044014715,0.00013064849,0.000115886214,0.00026664798,0.00057623436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024680276,0.00036283938,0.00020878055,0.0010801789,0.025478534,0.0067908936,0.0010015697,0.0016584938,0.0048577376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047730063,0.00021819357,0.00016441169,0.0006184876,0.041536056,0.008789987,0.0036955117,0.00312722,0.0003724711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026492378,0.00003561918,0.0033316133,0.000014481572,0.0000052841747,0.00078047946,0.59430087,0.00009242059,0.00026597612,0.38159144,0.007850877,0.01170439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010579025,0.000048503847,0.00474793,0.00014596152,0.000010754806,0.0008043049,0.66350806,0.00041708173,0.00040331925,0.06586728,0.26399338,0.000042839172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12054271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.116576165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12054271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009014293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00417404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23968214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217192632","doi":"","title":"Blackstone’s Legal Actors: The Passions of a Rational Jurist","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Enthusiasm; Feeling; Law; Sensibility; Relation (database); Jurisprudence; Law and literature; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04871861220376768,"score_gpt":0.3824876357147918,"score_spread":0.3337690235110241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217192632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035508312,0.013061555,0.0069826925,0.4529438,0.00402786,0.000049975915,0.000059485734,0.000086325614,0.48728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7621936,0.0051158075,0.0020584376,0.04415438,0.0047215475,0.00013878912,0.0000342568,0.00025055365,0.18133251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99334735,0.0042537167,0.00008711237,0.0006486843,0.0011351659,0.0005279226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937,0.0046264734,0.0003622138,0.0002864257,0.00074120174,0.0002836481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032684775,0.00054565776,0.0004370404,0.001051098,0.013977677,0.012392833,0.0012957786,0.007945982,0.0052629136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012747696,0.00039411173,0.00031007556,0.00090129854,0.026864208,0.009221256,0.004074079,0.011819507,0.0009466995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012461062,0.000007739065,0.00009463703,0.00002676796,0.0000022839442,0.00017779083,0.048930597,0.00005143153,0.00012010053,0.9009986,0.0467234,0.00285428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008491049,0.00001703008,0.00027247597,0.00022938134,0.0000052110922,0.00011683708,0.025768258,0.0003024991,0.0003337355,0.1819049,0.7910203,0.000020798738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01148599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0116825495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013977677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076996097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027613123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05586481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218609995","doi":"","title":"Ambiguities: Law, Morality, and Legal Subjectivity in H.L.A. Hart's the Concept of Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Philosophy of law; Law; Legal positivism; Legal realism; Legal profession; Comparative law; Positive law; Critical legal studies; Private law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Black letter law","score_opus":0.011370640874363252,"score_gpt":0.271782830726336,"score_spread":0.2604121898519728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218609995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08486417,0.059565846,0.052033078,0.20491143,0.0027146558,0.00016536537,0.00011453738,0.00009808045,0.59553295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9449474,0.010293102,0.0077279774,0.012628522,0.0028145895,0.00018882145,0.000034520373,0.00008412208,0.021280993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916922,0.0053475252,0.00020635272,0.0005611929,0.0016329815,0.0005596905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99239564,0.006145735,0.0005593834,0.00027345575,0.00038313452,0.00024266886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007635201,0.00056204014,0.00062644127,0.0021015182,0.008164005,0.0116105145,0.001487958,0.0052633057,0.0023657244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009419643,0.00049646996,0.0005307579,0.0025038216,0.07929611,0.01233251,0.0052701836,0.0077036694,0.00030830633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028392667,0.0000070458946,0.000066787456,0.000011663506,6.919971e-7,0.000035727924,0.011624336,0.00004351077,0.000018982813,0.98536754,0.0011525563,0.0016684466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010165999,0.000012687533,0.00019089895,0.00010557774,0.000002238052,0.000052610132,0.0058046477,0.00017204737,0.00006646802,0.9442978,0.049273685,0.0000112647185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006441562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051581333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0116105145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075464235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044603585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054753423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218767074","doi":"","title":"Graetz, Shirley. She Wrote on Clay. Overland Park, KS: Hadley Rillie Books, 2013.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women in Judaism A Multidisciplinary e-Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.03701603708076284,"score_gpt":0.3147518289738568,"score_spread":0.27773579189309394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218767074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004847082,0.14211698,0.001708405,0.1215563,0.019469809,0.00007336618,0.00085429294,0.00040763288,0.7089661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022026723,0.016340492,0.00074752496,0.010626807,0.000815383,0.00002481226,0.00013515528,0.00022119861,0.9490619],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943334,0.00015505675,0.000027556875,0.00007677666,0.00022094806,0.00008644804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992054,0.0002489569,0.000046860667,0.00004340091,0.00029700433,0.00015853184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067469734,0.0005505568,0.000280141,0.0011831546,0.0035671499,0.0033788742,0.00051663263,0.0016274507,0.05382392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030388373,0.0003527889,0.00022672709,0.001014918,0.0021751039,0.0034074523,0.0013498043,0.002656418,0.015267815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022193135,0.0000070853334,0.0002178283,0.000110939865,0.0000023207413,0.00020270418,0.0035120368,0.00001562674,0.00016037743,0.012181781,0.9276502,0.055916842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013720154,0.0000034075013,0.00021605326,0.00010524485,0.0000012249247,0.00012958555,0.0015064081,0.000006494049,0.00006715325,0.0011058957,0.99685377,0.00000340167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019462984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06459925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05382392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019440417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002747809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18005896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219012925","doi":"","title":"Romance, Realism, and the Legitimacy of Implied Rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bill of rights; Reservation of rights; Political science; Fundamental rights; Law; Ex post facto law; Charter; International human rights law; Rights of Nature; Constitution; Right to property; Human rights; Linguistic rights; Legitimacy; Politics; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.011672164115470838,"score_gpt":0.25403201645377715,"score_spread":0.24235985233830631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219012925","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037373506,0.0051537566,0.03469824,0.104735926,0.0009847675,0.00008219672,0.00011072523,0.00006489187,0.81679595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588154,0.0013654982,0.005561207,0.005950062,0.00079610903,0.00016166766,0.0000618658,0.000070867696,0.027217297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791277,0.011175676,0.00088188396,0.0029068834,0.0043119676,0.0015959584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96323305,0.02669377,0.0020587335,0.0043591824,0.0028636216,0.00079163816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020603647,0.0005533535,0.001051078,0.0021763635,0.010777225,0.014759709,0.002770619,0.012125155,0.008184194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04870029,0.0008078796,0.00083507394,0.0014312664,0.0999501,0.019158643,0.008399396,0.016144903,0.0009620526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020012526,0.000001457319,0.00002428117,0.000004274093,6.696526e-7,0.000012718509,0.00050553126,0.000026153668,0.000009074888,0.9988232,0.0002759438,0.00031466322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016075945,0.0000042128654,0.000063665386,0.00005478071,0.0000031840677,0.000030545907,0.00033770475,0.0002463958,0.00006149371,0.9839385,0.015236643,0.000006890546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073004034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063813687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020603647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010463228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065735443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10896379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W222040118","doi":"","title":"Sociotechnical Arguments in Scientific Discourse: Expert Depositions in Tobacco Litigation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œReview of litigation","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Rhetorical question; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology; Naturalism; Rhetoric; Representation (politics); Law; Politics; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.021117459518554968,"score_gpt":0.35175838365780354,"score_spread":0.33064092413924856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W222040118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13034046,0.024829691,0.01031206,0.31590602,0.0021175796,0.00016692147,0.00016086045,0.00008356687,0.5160829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97895914,0.003037597,0.0012558135,0.008040277,0.0011767382,0.000095428346,0.00003343416,0.000030038173,0.0073716356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9372645,0.041946717,0.0020690868,0.0030636012,0.012565341,0.0030907316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77795285,0.20243506,0.009126146,0.0025578255,0.005819588,0.0021085276],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04486348,0.00085819664,0.00095638726,0.009359745,0.032024495,0.03252871,0.0044653625,0.028189907,0.009391294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.093384214,0.00077827694,0.00081991375,0.008515263,0.071205094,0.022510836,0.013958244,0.013590797,0.000706617],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028416853,0.000051140338,0.0007135278,0.0002165735,0.000015158835,0.000917323,0.15802349,0.00026306257,0.0001470155,0.8278367,0.006598275,0.005189483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007155314,0.000046837402,0.002725722,0.0024813,0.000050289564,0.00044859716,0.19376877,0.0023453603,0.0007797517,0.5717521,0.22543716,0.00009257503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025755977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018396627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9679755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039600503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018055344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28732312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2220704094","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i2.4373","title":"INCOMMENSURABLE LEGAL CULTURES: INDIGENOUS LEGAL TRADITIONS AND THE COLONIAL NARRATIVE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Mythology; Ethnology; Narrative; Humanities; Sociology; History; Anthropology; Philosophy; Art; Theology; Literature; Ecology","score_opus":0.027444553619193755,"score_gpt":0.3330571556791615,"score_spread":0.30561260205996776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2220704094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6739665,0.010476778,0.0009667662,0.018793387,0.00019229988,0.000019277812,0.000013223908,0.000009861019,0.29556194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99367344,0.0016640746,0.00015975212,0.0005129503,0.000036297577,0.000008470381,0.0000028942302,0.0000051739207,0.003936925],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967655,0.0019092466,0.000099851975,0.00020439796,0.00049228803,0.00052877684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966413,0.0020429348,0.00044136672,0.00020240742,0.00021755337,0.0004544249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029860497,0.00023302827,0.0002848165,0.0012790997,0.019062692,0.0075089787,0.0010058513,0.0013990366,0.0023645868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005385556,0.00023665983,0.00015047812,0.0013999229,0.043503374,0.0067592845,0.006599265,0.003823917,0.00012110852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046822065,0.000012008829,0.00080503157,0.000025531566,0.000002606647,0.0004423417,0.72882795,0.000020619342,0.00006559641,0.2659068,0.00064163154,0.003245156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012620764,0.000034477842,0.0046560382,0.0005565384,0.000015688336,0.0007471191,0.7792856,0.00020017668,0.00022670641,0.0772138,0.13702041,0.00003085511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05961475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071840756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05961475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072007794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004224848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11853552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222077086","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511511042.012","title":"Written Constitutions and Unwritten Constitutionalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Expression (computer science); Constitutionalism; Sovereignty; Ideal (ethics); Politics; Jeremy bentham; Natural (archaeology); Natural law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Comparative law; History; Democracy; Computer science","score_opus":0.028814369910500362,"score_gpt":0.22578777921621476,"score_spread":0.1969734093057144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222077086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009312639,0.008491582,0.007073853,0.014792793,0.0006592377,0.000027914639,0.00007370234,0.00006507386,0.9595033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6403053,0.0054407697,0.0036075609,0.0037271956,0.0007937141,0.0001436361,0.00017315646,0.0001098418,0.34569886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852353,0.0007178427,0.00004349481,0.00021316604,0.0003478269,0.00015420011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998895,0.0006162093,0.00007636183,0.00023548571,0.00012419383,0.000052846797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016570638,0.0003012918,0.0002571253,0.00084644713,0.0028065557,0.005681005,0.0006300233,0.0012850361,0.008027429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004193758,0.00025130753,0.00018373165,0.0008626588,0.018080655,0.0041026226,0.002107969,0.0038101838,0.001101108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.573288e-7,0.0000025088104,0.00001273491,0.0000072827133,4.7272e-7,0.0000079463925,0.00047830303,0.000057963018,0.000019656387,0.9950708,0.002140967,0.002200407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010755715,0.000006118097,0.00014876437,0.000113962655,0.000002895292,0.000027141967,0.00049068755,0.00020071329,0.00012873735,0.7732368,0.22562845,0.000005062377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034095093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045318296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008027429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004522267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002721072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032811463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226735801","doi":"10.3390/soc6010002","title":"Spatial Explorations and Digital Traces: Experiences of Legal Blindness through Filmmaking","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Societies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Blindness; Narrative; Context (archaeology); Perception; Architecture; Sociology; Psychology; Visual arts; Public relations; Political science; History; Art; Medicine; Optometry; Literature","score_opus":0.04161840141210859,"score_gpt":0.3077887085870312,"score_spread":0.2661703071749226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226735801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9296688,0.0018396024,0.0050713937,0.0050357804,0.00014664202,0.000081840255,0.00016878395,0.000090667985,0.057896536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950388,0.0005968985,0.0009175761,0.00015693842,0.000019383844,0.000023575887,0.000028717792,0.00003816831,0.0031798873],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953902,0.003215954,0.00012751498,0.0003367454,0.0005271411,0.00040249334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99303037,0.0050588152,0.0005424691,0.0005446717,0.0002923804,0.00053140154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038228543,0.00069806667,0.00045363413,0.0025503822,0.0106897075,0.008167871,0.0014537742,0.002058864,0.004278477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014498026,0.00054666423,0.00044278265,0.0019238017,0.025023729,0.008622702,0.009310479,0.0030175261,0.00034142018],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018199014,0.000008828486,0.00064606057,0.00004474744,0.00000449562,0.0005939833,0.9911054,0.000041019233,0.0003975616,0.004354461,0.00046483605,0.002320306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007796412,0.000032460273,0.0013152991,0.00017011407,0.0000142335775,0.0009305636,0.95139223,0.00014846219,0.00041776345,0.0025513424,0.04299666,0.000023045943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016096998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023925086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016096998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034221024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016056349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03200662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227296332","doi":"","title":"Bridging the Gap between Truth and Reconciliation: Restorative Justice and the Indian Residential School Truth and Reconciliation Commission","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, University of Notre Dame; University of Notre Dame","keywords":"Restorative justice; Bridging (networking); Commission; Bridge (graph theory); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.03573920099880498,"score_gpt":0.2872422142201619,"score_spread":0.25150301322135693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227296332","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070883796,0.010692659,0.010668494,0.47843242,0.0017755781,0.000059573045,0.000036401445,0.000106052874,0.42734507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976295,0.0017311166,0.001736703,0.012021523,0.00032988167,0.000047388978,0.0000080032305,0.000022103719,0.0078083207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97688216,0.01386159,0.00066499406,0.0008562005,0.003938575,0.0037966124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98589385,0.0083431,0.0014715734,0.0009782917,0.0018051032,0.0015081281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012139979,0.00025903992,0.00060724193,0.0022723295,0.027181882,0.022941984,0.002612906,0.007838614,0.004061879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024054918,0.00034215135,0.0005866572,0.0029370205,0.05876072,0.014731541,0.01683226,0.015346207,0.00046311718],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008762622,0.0000164733,0.00036404343,0.000028187613,0.000002615129,0.00010469902,0.0264355,0.00008759051,0.000027592372,0.9610694,0.0049694823,0.00688557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017970631,0.000034618395,0.0024004127,0.0004814665,0.000027180919,0.0003138709,0.12523612,0.00050596567,0.0004215735,0.6695188,0.20097171,0.00007028631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021866148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033744868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98370135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016298655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021672815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118255556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2227893062","doi":"","title":"Introduction: After Legal Equality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0066311317169555125,"score_gpt":0.2677352422227792,"score_spread":0.2611041105058237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2227893062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018904589,0.009366491,0.002510786,0.39367366,0.099312834,0.00010052021,0.0006535503,0.00024990697,0.49224183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030265827,0.0020230243,0.0010214284,0.25775486,0.024065794,0.00011640623,0.00030309687,0.00035175632,0.6840978],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688786,0.00062303524,0.00013151478,0.0007423722,0.0009545443,0.00066064193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980714,0.00060193863,0.000096266376,0.00023522021,0.00065318326,0.0003420546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027129939,0.0006418506,0.0005479625,0.0011021285,0.006082438,0.007274927,0.0016914264,0.010883493,0.09997489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074558705,0.00035099746,0.000965663,0.0008192218,0.00526091,0.00846781,0.0047923145,0.01142898,0.031801753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022942519,0.000021127298,0.00007272688,0.00009372174,0.0000036525435,0.000053200503,0.00064150343,0.000016379996,0.00012425803,0.27965993,0.7039218,0.015368646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008530644,0.000011213074,0.00035441233,0.00013901877,0.0000043763534,0.000035664518,0.000358648,0.000015988235,0.00012895005,0.027253784,0.97167826,0.0000111368745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007715149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012947788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09997489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036415483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037719663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33444935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228146457","doi":"10.1177/0263775815600599","title":"War/Law/Space Notes toward a legal geography of war","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning D Society and Space","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Geographer; Law of war; Law; Nexus (standard); Political science; Legitimacy; Just war theory; Sociology; Spanish Civil War; International law; Politics; Geography; Computer science; Cartography","score_opus":0.022112016511506523,"score_gpt":0.2477386343530997,"score_spread":0.22562661784159319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228146457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015781771,0.03863976,0.026884364,0.32109442,0.007189233,0.000030094223,0.00019926182,0.00010605387,0.5900751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83180565,0.031090045,0.010716314,0.026094167,0.014849078,0.000108725064,0.00019226407,0.00031604082,0.0848277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856025,0.0008211507,0.0000387284,0.00018396236,0.00023904323,0.00015696256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982626,0.0010255524,0.00019044423,0.00015739839,0.00017424239,0.00018983624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016154475,0.0004437133,0.00033180838,0.0022555648,0.0044490574,0.009097348,0.000859982,0.0033130664,0.009578841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031330378,0.00024745762,0.0004470015,0.002892205,0.028315412,0.011265165,0.0039799027,0.0070748106,0.0010336393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012568263,0.0000017379336,0.00005918088,0.000008031213,5.217258e-7,0.000014117131,0.00070042873,0.000051891773,0.000011641465,0.9908109,0.007086903,0.0012533809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036522058,0.000006718626,0.0005495821,0.000107089145,0.000003129661,0.00006371076,0.0032619177,0.00021922967,0.00006286254,0.6309584,0.36475632,0.000007419598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005894957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067836065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009578841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004749323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018971249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034458935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228525287","doi":"","title":"La stéganographie au Québec : lumière technique, ombres juridiques","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0068364206076122185,"score_gpt":0.19929240416249655,"score_spread":0.19245598355488433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228525287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18420471,0.012331807,0.07724953,0.026309505,0.0017929656,0.0004074073,0.0019851346,0.0015006434,0.6942182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5474046,0.0043297103,0.018365523,0.0011989796,0.000111097324,0.000104682666,0.00052613864,0.00020221194,0.42775714],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992366,0.00015859106,0.000022440694,0.00012505341,0.0003169821,0.00014047281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990024,0.00016772984,0.00005086764,0.00012421086,0.00056076073,0.000094070696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007585027,0.00048820605,0.00018703508,0.0013764238,0.0052350634,0.0031141941,0.00064158946,0.00092579407,0.02276526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020673915,0.0002043196,0.00018665509,0.0016996744,0.002285023,0.0014648798,0.0011937477,0.0013923475,0.002012036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023472508,0.000079240905,0.013084918,0.0005124868,0.000050079245,0.0010134907,0.02742232,0.0033353735,0.016019303,0.22658373,0.11334497,0.59831935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031094012,0.00009192612,0.025657652,0.00047598296,0.000047303405,0.00047082806,0.013478469,0.0057114363,0.011709292,0.007727868,0.9344477,0.00015040133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9128974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95471805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08710259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018685875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015733935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17523104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231435867","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Movie Stars and Sensuous Scars: Essays on the Journey from Disability Shame to Disability Pride","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Pride; Scars; Stars; Psychology; Art; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Medicine; Political science; Social psychology; Astronomy; Law; Surgery; Physics","score_opus":0.014041519201952398,"score_gpt":0.2461072201554113,"score_spread":0.2320657009534589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231435867","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023766697,0.7893128,0.00022992454,0.07102053,0.0701302,0.00005580148,0.00051693077,0.00006420684,0.06843193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034819557,0.6885725,0.00037537544,0.03342429,0.049816784,0.00014905438,0.0006738435,0.00011624143,0.22338994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928147,0.000112524634,0.00005124074,0.00006573752,0.00043195946,0.00005712355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953322,0.0020549009,0.00037733302,0.00007954618,0.0017059883,0.00045004432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091747474,0.0010308969,0.0015095832,0.0028227791,0.0013830173,0.0039233584,0.0014917807,0.0028516203,0.06831168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074051935,0.00046888954,0.00046681872,0.005348223,0.0011974028,0.0033866724,0.0012130175,0.003531536,0.028837835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031726668,0.000002395396,0.0000108628665,0.0002887383,0.0000021176222,0.000009705018,0.000021748381,0.0000065663617,0.000009800745,0.0002689143,0.9897289,0.009647106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072969106,0.000008319469,0.00030476967,0.0017243463,0.000006425097,0.00011139577,0.00009360438,0.000010922874,0.000014297807,0.00038078357,0.9973302,0.000007727607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058118813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016580135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06831168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021021822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037154357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22852534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231524895","doi":"","title":"Recent Developments in Sex and the Law: Recent Developments: Feminist Law Reform and Sexual Assault","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Law reform; Political science; Law; Criminology; Criminal law; Sociology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.011862807591145002,"score_gpt":0.2635103701635459,"score_spread":0.2516475625724009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231524895","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022867387,0.4166732,0.00070799177,0.44216594,0.0023190149,0.00003336281,0.00016956303,0.000026387826,0.115037076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45197737,0.4253858,0.0008433436,0.07961974,0.005550582,0.00004976546,0.00020633505,0.000040846295,0.036326215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962457,0.0006934426,0.000108226544,0.000385204,0.0014861713,0.0010812435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99254966,0.003805038,0.00053971726,0.00018028404,0.0017470054,0.0011783765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004916523,0.00032298258,0.00066761026,0.0023898794,0.008787441,0.009616044,0.0021357608,0.00630602,0.012751375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011150599,0.00036499018,0.0003620433,0.0057994686,0.036772948,0.00535194,0.0038128798,0.0068095215,0.0004449954],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044055865,0.00008089386,0.0021701267,0.00094642624,0.000014538991,0.0002096437,0.017442802,0.0006079014,0.00024616954,0.8049739,0.037260734,0.13600275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015506044,0.000031428455,0.01111651,0.0017605446,0.000011447766,0.00014504278,0.018539855,0.00016967912,0.00021160571,0.041051857,0.9269081,0.000038393093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78845584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85708815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78845584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08125212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.100694336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58952814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231780670","doi":"","title":"Emotions and the Veil of Voluntarism: The Loss of Judgment in Canadian Criminal Defences","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Criminal law; Voluntarism (philosophy); Normative; Agency (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011749941757060456,"score_gpt":0.24877121518877116,"score_spread":0.2370212734317107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231780670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44788206,0.003958248,0.001895141,0.19048132,0.00080361107,0.00004293,0.00009214795,0.00004673903,0.35479775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827785,0.0006155098,0.00022300016,0.003461576,0.000049171376,0.0000055610517,0.000009289573,0.000018548528,0.0128388265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959286,0.0006657108,0.00008140928,0.0003936273,0.0015981141,0.0013324841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996427,0.0010410699,0.00035952104,0.00013729018,0.0013287426,0.0007064252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00321941,0.00032364903,0.0003364535,0.0015206713,0.031472467,0.011133435,0.0020331037,0.0048887846,0.0047887703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010552893,0.00040723174,0.00040210958,0.0016533894,0.033215534,0.0035155904,0.0043020914,0.008051877,0.0002291538],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006927348,0.000044775577,0.008753578,0.00006855254,0.000018264494,0.0011564877,0.34780654,0.00045139733,0.0005745918,0.57817173,0.03302389,0.029860942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057847326,0.0000472392,0.069369055,0.00035863786,0.00009144763,0.00064164144,0.42765763,0.00260314,0.0008738465,0.13330449,0.36463836,0.00035662967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98480856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98992026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12721354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12721354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06214414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92300314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2232423633","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2165083","title":"What Sort of Legal Space is a City?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"sort; Space (punctuation); Computer science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.012445146459102434,"score_gpt":0.2896998852287009,"score_spread":0.27725473876959844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2232423633","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12411369,0.0041208607,0.0055007646,0.24064437,0.0011695854,0.000044884415,0.0008460506,0.000112402806,0.62344736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749766,0.0009793382,0.00083201955,0.0053644166,0.0002867657,0.00003647629,0.00014310505,0.00007369207,0.017307617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971551,0.0011183405,0.000108549015,0.0004282336,0.00041095252,0.00077886984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943666,0.0011369197,0.0008708445,0.0004604376,0.0010896083,0.0020754798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021770813,0.00029763053,0.0006628102,0.002885763,0.013741442,0.0224151,0.0015167724,0.004573821,0.030277366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007994126,0.0003696705,0.00056851143,0.0049930206,0.03760491,0.024691109,0.0054495432,0.0038293516,0.0030040902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018863837,0.000017143073,0.002301796,0.000051380368,0.000015908821,0.00007704219,0.013697115,0.00009651633,0.000071292685,0.9611531,0.016823333,0.0056764972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021830623,0.00002694149,0.005059548,0.00028886597,0.00003342298,0.00021304315,0.13852987,0.00026816374,0.00017618077,0.58536565,0.26994824,0.000068191075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040325396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05544807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040325396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005915265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076256185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1012879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237675829","doi":"","title":"Shayne Dark. Bodies of Evidence","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Espace Sculpture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0550109634401438,"score_gpt":0.3437473595261627,"score_spread":0.2887363960860189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237675829","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052490126,0.13946879,0.0004838747,0.801865,0.02006444,0.000053883865,0.0014795027,0.000042724663,0.036016833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038844626,0.16105649,0.0023781804,0.725124,0.020256188,0.00036652794,0.0020089843,0.00031869477,0.049646266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800439,0.006102228,0.0018601713,0.002568295,0.008658376,0.0007670851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7117946,0.22740301,0.01258646,0.009275205,0.035184957,0.0037557364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022882296,0.00083795586,0.0013286137,0.00850332,0.003057933,0.0069891857,0.004327514,0.022456577,0.08084599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24595673,0.0011218126,0.0009874052,0.0072117066,0.008349645,0.012452544,0.004478801,0.01536053,0.019280981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014222969,0.000028800965,0.00084993645,0.0030138714,0.00011351507,0.000082229526,0.00042768722,0.000032716944,0.00005478446,0.031037292,0.91787946,0.046337392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002735674,0.000020905632,0.00356121,0.021618333,0.00023814235,0.00016189934,0.0017522178,0.0000730509,0.00033138995,0.044990003,0.92692643,0.000052842926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01899577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02976372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08084599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004658432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010441627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27045673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2239234390","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous Australians in a Preamble","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Preamble; Constitution; Indigenous; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Government (linguistics); Engineering; Telecommunications; Linguistics","score_opus":0.037578650017471404,"score_gpt":0.28272594334213397,"score_spread":0.24514729332466256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2239234390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35252833,0.00736355,0.021831455,0.053580664,0.0033046743,0.0009026907,0.0001515028,0.00019975365,0.56013733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8784428,0.0014904188,0.012791057,0.014027894,0.00031336016,0.00040387557,0.000092176495,0.00004166254,0.092396855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986284,0.0063318685,0.0010881223,0.0011722216,0.0029268742,0.0021968773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99140584,0.003933282,0.00069295376,0.001138749,0.0022689358,0.00056026684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01890458,0.00034127175,0.00073761307,0.0012477813,0.009968345,0.0057284622,0.002334003,0.006269094,0.003544881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021169372,0.0007192485,0.00082672975,0.0010823787,0.013295288,0.0040066554,0.0075235055,0.012825463,0.0007107862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044300083,0.00007572468,0.0014557439,0.00024181546,0.000017570745,0.0008602235,0.067198426,0.0002925019,0.004271987,0.88914263,0.008051754,0.028347336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056759134,0.00044684,0.014836816,0.0011224513,0.00009665205,0.0008304152,0.024662433,0.0010204574,0.0047532134,0.095070414,0.8568585,0.00024503336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040541425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06333945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040541425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069431015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015835838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09997815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241031405","doi":"","title":"Legal Instrumentalism and the LSA: A 'Movie Treatment'","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Normative; Impulse (physics); Sociology; Political science; Art; Law and economics; Aesthetics; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011606483572488847,"score_gpt":0.2594128415938685,"score_spread":0.24780635802137968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241031405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064106815,0.0059811473,0.0074872654,0.100508064,0.0008175286,0.000043251304,0.00010577442,0.000120295335,0.82082987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9284874,0.0013940936,0.0012254787,0.0085760355,0.00035508032,0.000058395326,0.00003557584,0.00006490855,0.05980312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986304,0.00083114294,0.000028177088,0.00012609696,0.00021027373,0.00017391374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991375,0.00035766256,0.0000830955,0.00015695806,0.0001096115,0.0001551237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017672798,0.00028172662,0.00019576427,0.001131531,0.0072640777,0.006285802,0.0007324549,0.0024554748,0.008011532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031119226,0.000108687775,0.00022966147,0.00063279935,0.025551943,0.0048361663,0.002755208,0.004126852,0.0004957686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075211856,0.000007875387,0.0001500857,0.000012944471,0.0000011461098,0.000024438461,0.0070938147,0.000017593165,0.00009191299,0.98387516,0.004343406,0.004374152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021808532,0.000060609127,0.002952711,0.00025064326,0.000011551095,0.00016406484,0.01574625,0.0006536781,0.0008374727,0.24779865,0.73147565,0.0000269199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009474461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01783754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009474461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053720814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022145386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038977325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241494899","doi":"10.1080/10345329.2005.12036335","title":"‘Racial Profiling’: DNA Forensic Procedures and Indigenous People in Victoria","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Issues in Criminal Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Forensic science; Indigenous; Profiling (computer programming); DNA profiling; Forensic genetics; Criminology; Project commissioning; Racial profiling; Sociology; Publishing; Political science; History; Law; Biology; Computer science; DNA; Archaeology; Genetics; Microsatellite; Race (biology); Gender studies; Ecology","score_opus":0.030762014372862273,"score_gpt":0.3647476893173502,"score_spread":0.33398567494448794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241494899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9707691,0.004460155,0.00030771372,0.013269509,0.0000629105,0.000040829425,0.000013523685,0.0000027068452,0.011073432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99114215,0.0045729633,0.00047739202,0.0013551149,0.000037509097,0.000025586007,0.000008710964,0.0000025611776,0.002378091],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942121,0.0038210629,0.00017453672,0.00020350741,0.00086083275,0.0007279614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772924,0.0005963411,0.00055770896,0.00007051517,0.00043939785,0.0006068179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004702644,0.00012533226,0.0002537835,0.0010955277,0.010974007,0.0020274036,0.0008224314,0.0017310699,0.0009775767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008933056,0.0002735096,0.00015726837,0.0015303654,0.006147798,0.0017573861,0.0043153414,0.0018881551,0.00011739099],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059392416,0.0002182631,0.1152562,0.00023700009,0.000016070117,0.002771483,0.77479917,0.00010297961,0.0010338529,0.01095903,0.003236318,0.09131025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005070594,0.00026388737,0.29158986,0.00062371336,0.00003207998,0.0035269577,0.677383,0.00033825275,0.00029821112,0.00562763,0.020248305,0.00006304811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31878063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57794875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31878063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042227358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009065136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6338502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241999065","doi":"10.1111/cars.12088","title":"PAUL ANGELOBRIENZA, Vico and the Social Theory of Law: The Structure of Legal Communication. <scp>Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press, 2014, vi + 365 p. (ISBN: 978‐0‐77340‐050‐4).</scp>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Sociology; Art history; Library science; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.04173612634408122,"score_gpt":0.28232667737244704,"score_spread":0.24059055102836582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241999065","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004134727,0.84013826,0.0017222863,0.12098865,0.0037638035,0.000020855668,0.00025599427,0.00007917864,0.032617535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031770453,0.84867585,0.0032188883,0.01858909,0.006904319,0.000099719975,0.00039624784,0.0002811925,0.090064265],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987072,0.0004638441,0.00008712173,0.00018228986,0.00045981238,0.00009971272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967709,0.0022317697,0.00023742137,0.00009108389,0.0004804783,0.00018829964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018588745,0.0013762343,0.0008659319,0.0046765283,0.0034752835,0.006729179,0.0019955966,0.00460768,0.022541108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042970493,0.001149491,0.00047306542,0.0069100233,0.005368355,0.015156999,0.002218124,0.00601364,0.008917413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034784385,0.000018834331,0.00029763207,0.0008952235,0.000015439306,0.0000757414,0.002722306,0.000109778885,0.000111420275,0.08820748,0.8334417,0.07406962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013514861,0.0000098508635,0.0014480012,0.0013690919,0.000011938146,0.00021278627,0.0017549036,0.00015784547,0.00019013035,0.074704595,0.92010254,0.000024907873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054774232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09696607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054774232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058267755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066017224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1089108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2248655790","doi":"","title":"Journeys to 20th Street: The Inner City as Critical Pedagogical Space for Legal Education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Space (punctuation); Injustice; Ideology; Law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Critical theory; Elite; Critical race theory; Political science; Racism","score_opus":0.030977241147578223,"score_gpt":0.3877717970571399,"score_spread":0.35679455590956166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2248655790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40237442,0.008170776,0.023834143,0.10142993,0.0009845892,0.00010346219,0.000065715845,0.00012853638,0.46290848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99034154,0.0010855668,0.0021693795,0.0012281069,0.0000649696,0.000043001462,0.000010484462,0.00004051087,0.0050165495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940162,0.004728188,0.00006846767,0.0002460762,0.0002512539,0.00068986474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99533975,0.0022923767,0.00047095225,0.00045612056,0.00032738296,0.0011134234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044398666,0.0004770633,0.0003509615,0.002011099,0.019201871,0.018422808,0.0014796822,0.0029862172,0.0059007443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046518412,0.00048235682,0.00039359304,0.0014762207,0.072855875,0.016345847,0.017255256,0.004595061,0.00041937976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016999444,0.000023043827,0.0013981209,0.00006721097,0.000005710344,0.0004747227,0.47859213,0.00017071009,0.00015352938,0.50824064,0.0034624108,0.007394874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010728428,0.000027031187,0.0012581764,0.0002465278,0.000008407544,0.00030035427,0.6937211,0.00019157832,0.00019594032,0.14645217,0.15756725,0.000020731342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011691483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028652025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019201871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009579628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010085282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06950539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249384757","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-23069-6_13","title":"How Presumptive Legislation Got Started in Manitoba: A Personal History","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.09601143622705065,"score_gpt":0.26745289517118226,"score_spread":0.1714414589441316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249384757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1434313,0.09557421,0.0014299776,0.19070251,0.0015781703,0.00012330609,0.0004844107,0.00006292918,0.56661314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64774793,0.06537503,0.0012912526,0.03280223,0.0002994607,0.000115548,0.00019035081,0.00021739014,0.25196084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984249,0.0004598302,0.000041062034,0.00012590735,0.00026552798,0.00068280654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998086,0.00081542414,0.0001454507,0.000063613035,0.0005312664,0.00035835628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024830278,0.00039646745,0.00037900393,0.002704504,0.023005405,0.009951075,0.0022774779,0.005139609,0.0068482487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045741075,0.00076302356,0.00029864698,0.007720926,0.02098311,0.0045699105,0.0042553525,0.0076082204,0.00051660306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003484111,0.00006098138,0.0055141505,0.00039988165,0.000027736989,0.0014829547,0.3422016,0.0003006829,0.00050386036,0.5573205,0.04835699,0.043795902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068829104,0.000022240141,0.017034372,0.0016431126,0.000026087126,0.00027270522,0.1459231,0.00012591429,0.0005191209,0.017543105,0.81683105,0.000052292035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88690215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.965016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11309785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07876129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10647518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57145584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253188792","doi":"","title":"Law & Literature (As an Approach to Criminal Law)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law and literature; Criminal law; Law; Relation (database); Narrative; Drama; Legal writing; Sociology; Jury; Poetry; Political science; Literature; Art; Legal research","score_opus":0.011059259873368832,"score_gpt":0.27462532867559647,"score_spread":0.26356606880222766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253188792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029904244,0.14621401,0.0047006714,0.03835275,0.0069419066,0.00006577751,0.00012619619,0.000116904004,0.8004914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21789846,0.17994565,0.013186773,0.030892165,0.012182428,0.0005074288,0.00035279218,0.0004584587,0.5445758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740404,0.0014728111,0.00011730902,0.00026584146,0.0005414122,0.00019852018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978326,0.0011880734,0.000197955,0.00022220201,0.0002922292,0.00026697855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014980835,0.0007592519,0.00057831855,0.0063153934,0.0074220714,0.017464016,0.0010982088,0.0033494572,0.0131083485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036227403,0.00041631664,0.00039144704,0.00627077,0.018699411,0.011167042,0.0054118643,0.004609233,0.004042846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034834095,0.000013881686,0.00017912446,0.00018944878,0.0000039289416,0.0001203685,0.009245505,0.000071103816,0.00008836347,0.90368694,0.062286455,0.024111412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001957449,0.000008809886,0.00025596016,0.00077208114,0.0000027885083,0.00022760661,0.005891431,0.00006438585,0.000044180357,0.09819202,0.89453346,0.0000053403182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004147831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006493014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017464016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006232062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056264545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045217037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254632329","doi":"","title":"Are We 'Persons' Yet?: Law and Sexuality in Canada [Book Review]","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adelaide law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Project commissioning; Human sexuality; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04857682631416846,"score_gpt":0.3057611207997737,"score_spread":0.2571842944856052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254632329","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025377405,0.96356237,0.00007981282,0.010986662,0.0017191079,0.000021760135,0.00027612087,0.000020955795,0.023079546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0051424145,0.9564814,0.00019533701,0.0053463597,0.0006190074,0.000036517376,0.0003390335,0.000023776705,0.031816084],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989347,0.00009387092,0.000036403213,0.00005927913,0.000724681,0.00015093059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974172,0.00044340067,0.00012382738,0.000042990847,0.0017129167,0.00025972456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001085873,0.0009063878,0.0012996831,0.004328975,0.0036831307,0.005042944,0.0018776192,0.002453161,0.01702178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037928051,0.0005408623,0.00038295577,0.014916843,0.002865221,0.0022951106,0.0009845237,0.002576445,0.0028609124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001094998,0.000008346886,0.00024164116,0.0017541869,0.000016966067,0.000043937183,0.0004960945,0.00011720762,0.000035390916,0.00662382,0.86294526,0.12770633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000581701,0.00000781995,0.002722717,0.0027976758,0.000031088814,0.00009887762,0.00062914874,0.000033305874,0.000019729596,0.0009476341,0.99268895,0.00001710171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94272095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9805424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05727905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029433807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13402326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21355826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255382302","doi":"","title":"The Plays: The Thing - The Medieval Courtly Lesson: Law And Lawlessness","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Admiration; SWORD; Knight; Queen (butterfly); Beauty; Art; Chivalry; Literature; Celtic languages; Romance; Emperor; Meaning (existential); Art history; History; Classics; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Ancient history","score_opus":0.007640983243302295,"score_gpt":0.2574490509965592,"score_spread":0.2498080677532569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255382302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043179322,0.023305219,0.002597255,0.20748594,0.0028138382,0.000031598385,0.00012554959,0.00009107424,0.7203701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7584256,0.006342929,0.0005387608,0.017517198,0.0010179033,0.000026043042,0.00004673638,0.00012222955,0.21596253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987656,0.0005808801,0.000019482792,0.000117691176,0.00019854166,0.00031770344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893063,0.00044870598,0.000091344635,0.00008111912,0.00013993075,0.00030823113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012925349,0.0004659431,0.00029879168,0.0005746043,0.011467937,0.009938361,0.00085036387,0.0024065364,0.00930963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00250398,0.00025730286,0.00014556454,0.0005159636,0.037563313,0.007957127,0.0024613966,0.0048950682,0.0010244919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030585416,0.000021519405,0.0006738707,0.00004636693,0.0000045275247,0.00021300433,0.10787748,0.0000437879,0.00016171415,0.77583176,0.104219206,0.010876179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010987114,0.000022172284,0.0016606583,0.00023586175,0.0000051950365,0.0002100378,0.08651746,0.000088873036,0.00023338613,0.057640746,0.8533587,0.000015973264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09374909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16535941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09374909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011424741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034181771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18640685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255626200","doi":"","title":"Theoretical Debates: Harm in the Context of Obscenity and Indecency Law in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.008611949879292806,"score_gpt":0.2545492206393915,"score_spread":0.2459372707600987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255626200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31059232,0.005705805,0.0020391748,0.29019326,0.00040590516,0.00007355381,0.0003262669,0.000032301778,0.39063138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97048336,0.0012921223,0.00034192688,0.010224098,0.000091438385,0.000019801735,0.000033087934,0.00003072978,0.01748335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874204,0.0021617783,0.00023207949,0.0010107427,0.0029127467,0.006262249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98170173,0.008511749,0.00085163815,0.00058208534,0.0050192196,0.0033335432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068055363,0.00042665526,0.0013874578,0.003192521,0.05568748,0.023233471,0.0057253907,0.014691838,0.012208604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025807057,0.00060032576,0.00096906524,0.0059894384,0.055222616,0.0076111443,0.008441711,0.017514924,0.00037175755],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002563277,0.000028472015,0.0025815477,0.000039154176,0.000013584126,0.00021000586,0.023858024,0.0004718112,0.000053026546,0.9612406,0.008154099,0.0033241194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001108685,0.000045663615,0.020153282,0.0007512703,0.0001579757,0.0002959128,0.18164344,0.0036743819,0.0005272198,0.5423512,0.24997902,0.0003097536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99490094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22798356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22798356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30917466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8954296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255699301","doi":"","title":"Privacy - Two Episodes: Princess Diana's Death and Les Editions Vice-Versa Inc. V. Aubry","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Charter; Spectacle; Entertainment; Political science; Law; Permission; The Right to Privacy; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.012936188224276094,"score_gpt":0.2927662792495185,"score_spread":0.27983009102524237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255699301","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27403936,0.0060817404,0.00090146525,0.42650306,0.0014955123,0.0000741437,0.0003461613,0.00006671549,0.29049188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7057374,0.001986797,0.00021757714,0.14620006,0.0003713383,0.000061565894,0.00010693707,0.00003545828,0.14528286],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976859,0.00060029107,0.000039149636,0.00016988565,0.00039888514,0.0011059189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768364,0.0010663433,0.00015734101,0.00012143537,0.00038340795,0.0005877478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018822978,0.00030636427,0.00036062152,0.00043761652,0.03857002,0.005976635,0.0012010576,0.008597862,0.004670894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054110815,0.0005076143,0.00039467475,0.0007490869,0.008351224,0.0033141077,0.0034597355,0.01777,0.0004418454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001358036,0.00009555048,0.005618533,0.000081855964,0.000024556859,0.010190869,0.23904467,0.00021650965,0.0005265448,0.24703835,0.4821804,0.014846379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033934233,0.00003387826,0.009993064,0.00023430459,0.000025993257,0.0019272387,0.1567127,0.00026427893,0.00070275797,0.008300781,0.82168776,0.00008337299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7156971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81307685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7156971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018996315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011407579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57195437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256571252","doi":"","title":"I Beg to Differ: Questions about Law, Language and Dissent","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Dissenting opinion; Persuasion; Judicial opinion; Law; Section (typography); Political science; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Linguistics; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.004855599716446601,"score_gpt":0.2961853455098568,"score_spread":0.2913297457934102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256571252","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08644153,0.012889298,0.01665269,0.44051665,0.0018196825,0.00004329889,0.000118035125,0.000061929706,0.44145694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9539571,0.0027880166,0.0026647218,0.028302804,0.0012296146,0.000063431275,0.00004607389,0.000053186915,0.010895118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98431486,0.009786565,0.00038503297,0.0015648433,0.0022956685,0.0016530767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98746955,0.00806044,0.00096313725,0.001055897,0.0012895989,0.0011614595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016438514,0.00045422628,0.00081439305,0.0020792116,0.013276474,0.015107332,0.002726397,0.007251242,0.0053077424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04012042,0.00023923548,0.0005124061,0.002223021,0.10447295,0.025161993,0.0073449886,0.008791744,0.0009773537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000133072845,0.000008955636,0.0004985273,0.000022810991,0.000003857348,0.00007507393,0.02443407,0.00006195894,0.00006564721,0.9668742,0.0027618802,0.0051797847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008694882,0.000014436576,0.00062934903,0.00014119723,0.0000048281454,0.000080213256,0.039241806,0.0001477867,0.0001171473,0.9304788,0.029115494,0.000020318066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015541174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009964129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016438514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077687507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007334378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086936235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256910758","doi":"10.82308/47099","title":"Three systems theoretic essays in the sociology of law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University; Oklahoma State University","keywords":"Sociology; Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Constitutional theory; Doctrine; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science","score_opus":0.030295979547648955,"score_gpt":0.2746480877402079,"score_spread":0.24435210819255893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256910758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024285242,0.032824505,0.14120264,0.1305184,0.0042869854,0.00016128353,0.00030694014,0.00021324519,0.66620076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8307127,0.020545809,0.02234257,0.007887028,0.0032508697,0.00062964973,0.0002558999,0.00021902836,0.11415647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99710494,0.0012853857,0.00012882346,0.00032558676,0.0008378143,0.00031731074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957837,0.0026500153,0.0002836417,0.0004897855,0.00045496668,0.00033796972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040229633,0.0008717643,0.0006469609,0.0033093197,0.0038481054,0.007973883,0.0013777378,0.002957748,0.010020006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007176528,0.00048737676,0.0013819826,0.0025491903,0.018219095,0.007987765,0.004561307,0.003689197,0.0010861808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036635452,0.000006516392,0.000083458435,0.00002249589,0.000002195836,0.000020969435,0.00070060696,0.0002952094,0.000033664313,0.99407357,0.0024901764,0.0022674126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011747528,0.000017193492,0.00030111856,0.00008590075,0.0000064324267,0.00005878018,0.0010555162,0.0012415617,0.000112795366,0.8799758,0.117123604,0.0000095545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031942576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019767869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010020006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008859179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033171314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064278126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257115874","doi":"","title":"Law's Empire","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Politics; Sociology; Subject (documents); Legal culture; Humanities; Political science; Law; Art; Library science","score_opus":0.010026291770367884,"score_gpt":0.297103733492762,"score_spread":0.2870774417223941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257115874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020303078,0.018629162,0.0073896362,0.13242601,0.0014176178,0.00003531849,0.00015169077,0.000092098686,0.81955546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88694763,0.008867572,0.0026129282,0.013325088,0.00085452414,0.0001047773,0.00007914415,0.000099211844,0.08710912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599636,0.0021333073,0.00012614741,0.00059720344,0.0006950645,0.00045199902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946031,0.00297724,0.0003104575,0.0010458273,0.0006886034,0.00037475151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004597408,0.00035627588,0.00058609294,0.0021270965,0.0057651536,0.010601013,0.00081940606,0.0027455806,0.0073886546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012934473,0.000322113,0.00031408563,0.0010614789,0.034014963,0.007270937,0.004126599,0.0052322284,0.00086625165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033876024,0.0000050938147,0.00018515642,0.00001524509,0.0000030528413,0.00003300476,0.0015956286,0.00009097588,0.000018962926,0.9868694,0.006398332,0.004781768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010699055,0.000016195074,0.0006878245,0.0002625884,0.000003840491,0.000082304614,0.002246239,0.00036973553,0.000087399676,0.6814294,0.31479567,0.000008302133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014422976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01379633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014422976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008819613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008823149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06399107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258009274","doi":"","title":"Bodying Black Goddesses:The Duty of Representation Across Time and Cultures","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternate routes","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Duty; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.029455057318224835,"score_gpt":0.33453193036628487,"score_spread":0.30507687304806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258009274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30130795,0.0029901534,0.03342837,0.04929814,0.0006991436,0.00006244159,0.000069018526,0.00006410434,0.6120807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805325,0.0002789289,0.0024498093,0.0010063302,0.000049880495,0.000033194065,0.000011938199,0.00007341901,0.015563883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874047,0.009091228,0.0002160395,0.0009007632,0.0011342656,0.0012531108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909185,0.003674237,0.0010054337,0.0019917465,0.0014285746,0.0009814405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011951392,0.00034198668,0.0004199048,0.0018671394,0.015595618,0.012943504,0.0018811666,0.0041511846,0.0072245034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025291353,0.0004675916,0.00032189072,0.0016788834,0.068020344,0.013760454,0.010028818,0.005519556,0.000565829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021004415,0.0000114325085,0.0006890163,0.00001695161,0.000004516648,0.000075196454,0.24435802,0.000038775324,0.00013706188,0.74376494,0.0015730582,0.009310041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001812098,0.000045717563,0.0024130242,0.0004058466,0.000024972871,0.0003890324,0.45033175,0.00045555382,0.0007766225,0.40413776,0.14094795,0.000053603457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014371342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018762995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015595618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039457553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051308605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06320572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258703083","doi":"","title":"Navigating Legal Rights in Spatial Media","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01298794942161353,"score_gpt":0.29810226036885024,"score_spread":0.2851143109472367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258703083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25270876,0.00068555516,0.071631804,0.018821133,0.00017253001,0.00009266325,0.0002322903,0.0002253525,0.65543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741993,0.00021423727,0.007262291,0.0004157211,0.000037402093,0.000047811227,0.00006377941,0.000059073678,0.017700426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996714,0.0017783407,0.00013280768,0.00040685764,0.0005043838,0.00046363147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892564,0.007087975,0.00082147913,0.0014318122,0.0007688947,0.00063343375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004302189,0.0003000202,0.0003225389,0.0017388642,0.004862438,0.014788652,0.0015385587,0.0034777462,0.030082228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022638177,0.0003661121,0.0004026702,0.0017319699,0.011038696,0.026617484,0.0090376055,0.002230423,0.0018432979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031192274,0.00004955603,0.0024254601,0.00005265818,0.000009226531,0.00034368207,0.022845352,0.0015051324,0.00072922336,0.95150816,0.002483439,0.018016918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018804763,0.000030086174,0.0012326629,0.00014789839,0.000018217792,0.00019385351,0.04969961,0.005278214,0.0010815618,0.8744717,0.067805074,0.000022180537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010341609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009812763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030082228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021290113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028449083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10063505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259715009","doi":"","title":"Criminal Law on the Aboriginal Plains : The First Nations and the First Criminal Court in the North-West Territories, 1870–1903","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Law; Political science; Criminal justice; Criminology; Geography; Sociology","score_opus":0.026533994881862148,"score_gpt":0.274020273923188,"score_spread":0.24748627904132586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259715009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.970595,0.002006244,0.000038629467,0.0008458706,0.00001713646,0.000013543444,0.00042568977,0.0000024063836,0.026055455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99127156,0.0021973855,0.00010474327,0.0001330414,0.000007844724,0.000010710244,0.00022029449,0.0000044272206,0.00604997],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990669,0.00012473812,0.000031693864,0.00007023536,0.00022083882,0.0004856277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981646,0.00031913427,0.00038094426,0.00006203207,0.00071253226,0.00036089888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087894977,0.00017025103,0.0003237027,0.003058209,0.008760191,0.0018891457,0.0009822733,0.0005227171,0.002560273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002544564,0.00028031197,0.00016053402,0.007140142,0.0065263878,0.0011739559,0.002057861,0.0014129963,0.0002572636],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008587925,0.000065838554,0.26863167,0.00020931949,0.00004527387,0.0019878035,0.64973795,0.000388812,0.0010471127,0.032139014,0.006205036,0.03945632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029462426,0.000019310004,0.78851914,0.00021330944,0.000015820542,0.0003303565,0.17543429,0.000075250406,0.0002527256,0.0005489701,0.034557838,0.000030106004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98631555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042685512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042685512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03673115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3097065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259722634","doi":"10.3138/utlj.3398","title":"The inhospitable court","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Jury; Allegation; Plaintiff; Sexual violence; Law; Criminology; Meaning (existential); Political science; Criminal justice; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.007220496383931603,"score_gpt":0.21774061532967542,"score_spread":0.21052011894574382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259722634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13138224,0.001684722,0.012703269,0.032546047,0.0006156165,0.00016579875,0.00013831934,0.00008117676,0.8206828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541795,0.00030116283,0.0010804038,0.0028361366,0.00017915825,0.00006243378,0.00003529895,0.000041234973,0.041284617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893478,0.0044960356,0.00031905874,0.0014381291,0.002951888,0.0014470654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940211,0.0018795693,0.0006509412,0.0011626121,0.0008335648,0.0014521728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040245494,0.0002981099,0.00031894413,0.0008009437,0.011329232,0.009784638,0.0011847527,0.0022261166,0.014255006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01825858,0.00030897133,0.00016377939,0.0005365456,0.027923383,0.0037405167,0.00987261,0.0048893876,0.0011081806],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027392107,0.00002196306,0.0023667095,0.00004869573,0.000010650087,0.00083249644,0.046003703,0.00012845323,0.0011501792,0.9087191,0.016701298,0.023989243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003268902,0.000079437916,0.008518475,0.0003776357,0.000016819804,0.0012392439,0.07590725,0.0006057053,0.0012131165,0.33120912,0.5807448,0.00005563124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010923022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020278895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014255006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004805094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007186691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04768777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260458824","doi":"10.26530/oapen_579632","title":"Droits et voix - Rights and Voices : La criminologie a l'Universite d'Ottawa - Criminology at the University of Ottawa","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03945792404318771,"score_gpt":0.2656837284383327,"score_spread":0.226225804395145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260458824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01980863,0.17148587,0.00048516673,0.050568268,0.0024801963,0.000051678515,0.00037132882,0.00007928193,0.7546696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3812787,0.042996496,0.000571047,0.0023623172,0.00036624118,0.00006648713,0.00013048138,0.00010468577,0.57212347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989059,0.00025603166,0.00003587555,0.000104441504,0.0002984378,0.0003993375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989844,0.0003852362,0.000079673926,0.0000904953,0.00017996281,0.00028019928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079657737,0.00059504283,0.00036967843,0.0013142363,0.013914957,0.009718792,0.0012070414,0.002685093,0.010290496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018623716,0.00051717187,0.00020537902,0.0022871557,0.016884437,0.0045169503,0.0025829757,0.0033735295,0.0015036352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038782873,0.000020854419,0.0022828823,0.0002669983,0.0000094634515,0.000396742,0.09233771,0.0002254835,0.00023309326,0.58351517,0.2625644,0.058108434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043452874,0.000008868647,0.0049258685,0.00047163645,0.000012861003,0.00028168876,0.033806816,0.000061453735,0.00016682109,0.010698315,0.9495351,0.0000262922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89153576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96667415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10846424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05666045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037015583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4111023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261132041","doi":"","title":"Privacy, Rights, and Moral Value","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right to privacy; The Right to Privacy; Internet privacy; Set (abstract data type); Moral rights; Value (mathematics); Information privacy; Intrusion; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Human rights; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.009422166020581673,"score_gpt":0.27792535639342625,"score_spread":0.2685031903728446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261132041","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035636574,0.010051071,0.05871539,0.15898868,0.0007324475,0.000106994004,0.00019425101,0.00004784119,0.73552686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94561017,0.0048742862,0.010658631,0.009470992,0.0006018243,0.00017812793,0.00007150934,0.00003438731,0.028500069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946121,0.002873832,0.0002054896,0.00038754742,0.001070238,0.0008508896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99457693,0.0034075447,0.00060786185,0.0005546584,0.0004854776,0.0003674742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043953797,0.0005026224,0.00050044915,0.0014016551,0.004944787,0.011560754,0.0013765156,0.00638991,0.007749682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008765426,0.00031207266,0.00064489804,0.0018964172,0.044989884,0.013225268,0.0058775824,0.00535844,0.00073693675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018131527,0.0000029194384,0.0001086622,0.000007524453,0.0000013610926,0.000013547879,0.00046052175,0.000060058777,0.000016685977,0.99790263,0.0005179976,0.00090625486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040193436,0.000009728979,0.0003427231,0.00009009345,0.0000049002415,0.000074778545,0.0014636413,0.00034450655,0.00013106695,0.9653799,0.032146957,0.000007594994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010996268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008145328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011560754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076761716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004600774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05569476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261134222","doi":"","title":"A Critical Notice of the Hateful and the Obscene by L.W. Sumner","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Politics; Law; Normative; Democracy; Notice; Sociology; Political science; Identity (music); Political philosophy; Law and economics; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.0053812291929983954,"score_gpt":0.2747952472489563,"score_spread":0.26941401805595794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261134222","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047085662,0.040295508,0.0009875689,0.8968294,0.0059017236,0.000011674831,0.00004399003,0.000014524711,0.051207043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32022387,0.0527845,0.0024768438,0.43380848,0.009533152,0.00010981555,0.00006853076,0.0001994689,0.18079545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700075,0.0012663321,0.000083756095,0.00035758654,0.0009778362,0.00031369427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951409,0.0035467052,0.00012499122,0.00014432875,0.0007217381,0.0003212219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035115085,0.0005836071,0.00044899623,0.00096891617,0.018517744,0.008374325,0.0015349808,0.007118176,0.0029894258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009542245,0.0004490089,0.00030215157,0.0011682465,0.020195823,0.009402769,0.0030509457,0.014485509,0.0004511848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015986248,0.000018947676,0.00028158532,0.00007209055,0.000004485047,0.00021268033,0.015131927,0.000065007014,0.00013482335,0.4130118,0.55494696,0.016103797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000514954,0.000007793556,0.0007535087,0.00039176125,0.000005139733,0.00009568011,0.013120024,0.00013239398,0.00027452066,0.082861505,0.9023254,0.000027110395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16196117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33595613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16196117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0137676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011786532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32203692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261801704","doi":"","title":"Proximity – The Law of Ethics and the Ethics of Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Duty; Kantian ethics; Morality; Meta-ethics; Normative ethics; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Information ethics; Political science","score_opus":0.06664156886770904,"score_gpt":0.3627658424079038,"score_spread":0.29612427354019477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261801704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024324572,0.03139033,0.07693119,0.15918785,0.0017953074,0.00008068723,0.0001037404,0.00020949963,0.7059769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86313313,0.008484217,0.012601179,0.02063971,0.0025569177,0.0002038986,0.00007815364,0.0002260948,0.0920767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98810995,0.007081864,0.0004275177,0.0013602262,0.00232324,0.0006973117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99278367,0.0044398163,0.0006361089,0.00089489005,0.00076895015,0.0004766292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005309386,0.0005113832,0.000559935,0.0014803826,0.0056449,0.011520854,0.0012435545,0.0065698833,0.0066826637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012369062,0.00047187984,0.0005269309,0.0011820468,0.04757132,0.015908564,0.0061897654,0.006031781,0.0020703645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034281518,0.0000036282538,0.00006409583,0.00001675438,0.0000017507317,0.000028356768,0.0010967879,0.00006091676,0.00004138156,0.9949063,0.0018262033,0.0019504505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060764633,0.00000869353,0.00008984581,0.00006840424,0.0000015878151,0.00007091356,0.0006552937,0.00014855737,0.00006575968,0.9216489,0.07722978,0.0000061943015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033464548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020313892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011520854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006396425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005074986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046409547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262967144","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2061748","title":"Privacy, Shame and the Anxieties of Identity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Identity (music); Internet privacy; Argument (complex analysis); Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.009559644871420954,"score_gpt":0.2791074749180699,"score_spread":0.26954783004664895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262967144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39596972,0.0064977794,0.006985079,0.22022407,0.00055631954,0.000031597374,0.00005944673,0.000025572475,0.36965042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941094,0.0004209289,0.00022626651,0.0023244428,0.000105969724,0.000011391927,0.000004741666,0.0000068413483,0.0027901272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98890054,0.007857235,0.00024157585,0.0005803743,0.001405506,0.0010147627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755239,0.017704068,0.0026844537,0.0017417736,0.0010121156,0.0013337306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015305557,0.00027497904,0.0004980569,0.0011790616,0.010339632,0.0134041635,0.0011360466,0.008052857,0.004564101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0318229,0.00042154858,0.00039796508,0.0009852373,0.0689421,0.014505598,0.0069015273,0.0100342585,0.00039294598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100553625,0.000099505334,0.0043521435,0.00004375365,0.000020707734,0.00049963663,0.16427639,0.00014710172,0.00022760734,0.8159337,0.0035046693,0.010794185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007646889,0.00006896296,0.0043846564,0.00022265679,0.00002489606,0.00095544785,0.16503331,0.00056318275,0.00040132605,0.7791512,0.04904921,0.000068664885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041607916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032114494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015305557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027801886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041064434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08094454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263045615","doi":"","title":"The Unforgiven Sources of International Law: Nation-building, Violence and Gender in the West(ern)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Law; Scholarship; International law; Narrative; Sociology; Subjectivity; Masculinity; Meaning (existential); Political science; Gender studies; Epistemology; Literature","score_opus":0.01970021811482739,"score_gpt":0.2989889681922806,"score_spread":0.27928875007745324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263045615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40161633,0.04085695,0.0036647385,0.045564875,0.00049366534,0.000034666933,0.000058955313,0.000017065508,0.5076928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98052555,0.0064581633,0.00036775542,0.002094637,0.000120180586,0.000025825408,0.000010131466,0.000012903539,0.010384921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869484,0.00081064174,0.000029968782,0.000081350714,0.00015366633,0.00022950301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988148,0.0008576073,0.00015769419,0.000028793113,0.000039576265,0.000101643316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013260406,0.00032702636,0.0002895482,0.0015898009,0.009209922,0.006165193,0.00045242172,0.0024829297,0.0021238544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018722971,0.00020594377,0.0001377061,0.0018655848,0.026845707,0.006910638,0.0035437208,0.0017142196,0.00015444627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001565288,0.000015692609,0.0021508585,0.00005111924,0.000003239156,0.00046639153,0.3620924,0.000052991654,0.000151144,0.62187535,0.0033893967,0.009735765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007122969,0.000059634993,0.01405347,0.00075350807,0.000015950303,0.0014417784,0.39903408,0.000310185,0.0005746325,0.26351467,0.320199,0.000035944464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014267643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032234922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014267643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037157938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015250157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028369188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263316725","doi":"","title":"\"Because none of us are as cruel as all of us\": Anonymity and Subjectivation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Critical theory; Cultural studies; Sociology; Feminism; Criminology; Media studies; Social science; Environmental ethics; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.025951247084579535,"score_gpt":0.2879549027191851,"score_spread":0.2620036556346056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263316725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10227385,0.0053275726,0.049387116,0.23977546,0.0034257364,0.00012570615,0.00013861581,0.0002129666,0.5993329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94467986,0.0009744073,0.0028342984,0.016146053,0.00050773984,0.00012717317,0.000040516792,0.00020832015,0.03448163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95255315,0.038275223,0.00090858096,0.0021120156,0.0039626076,0.002188462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94603235,0.0353418,0.003909162,0.008321987,0.0047666077,0.0016281459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031163478,0.0004892078,0.0005753721,0.0008880004,0.017181933,0.012879062,0.0018761337,0.006767892,0.006992132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06892322,0.0005844376,0.00043891143,0.0010114267,0.058466494,0.02010248,0.011360562,0.008544444,0.0017193984],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059862836,0.000013710745,0.0008855303,0.00008408899,0.0000126047935,0.00031209635,0.21428856,0.0000714647,0.00029872873,0.746357,0.025087468,0.012528879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035908855,0.00004345643,0.00093040743,0.0007005508,0.00003521858,0.00084258965,0.14300103,0.00050217763,0.0014376843,0.48559675,0.36679196,0.00008213193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053189415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005546258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031163478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004305418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006678443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16481024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263605963","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900004008","title":"Jurisprudence as a Moral and Historical Inquiry","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Archetype; Universality (dynamical systems); Jurisprudence; Realm; Philosophy; Value (mathematics); Value theory; Law; Sociology; Mathematics; Political science","score_opus":0.044499790616415895,"score_gpt":0.3090017325874035,"score_spread":0.2645019419709876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263605963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020654427,0.056251217,0.014031089,0.14846304,0.0022086035,0.000049495357,0.000040453066,0.0000458357,0.7582558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94017625,0.014710741,0.0042684097,0.009567635,0.0021609743,0.00012312878,0.000034438308,0.00008946309,0.02886888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828744,0.010863029,0.00038732548,0.0016590432,0.0030678958,0.0011481987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98689747,0.009090072,0.00068068766,0.0010047562,0.001298826,0.0010281048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011861434,0.00053987367,0.00092703773,0.0037382164,0.017451877,0.017591694,0.0026330962,0.0072703552,0.0024351962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01716102,0.0005922347,0.00042086357,0.00388892,0.12969825,0.01285888,0.006579734,0.013074428,0.00042534535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.734333e-7,0.000003033467,0.00001980185,0.000005896742,5.0887e-7,0.000019784273,0.0037070408,0.00003379151,0.000007821277,0.9950917,0.00045007034,0.00065993983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055447535,0.00001092596,0.00016867055,0.00017474736,0.0000016049103,0.00009678558,0.007897134,0.00023220864,0.00004099938,0.77565426,0.21570888,0.000008183665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015113443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0111907665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025139177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025139177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012930389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18239832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263663485","doi":"10.22201/iij.24487937e.2011.5.8100","title":"50th Anniversary of Hart's The Concept of Law. Introduction","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Problema Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.029059746663384737,"score_gpt":0.26374822076189436,"score_spread":0.23468847409850963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263663485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035443031,0.22312723,0.005422429,0.15808661,0.16790554,0.00011590348,0.002109926,0.000261134,0.43942696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09856503,0.09410331,0.0022017495,0.028871585,0.0876813,0.0001826773,0.0008872869,0.00036607293,0.687141],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817395,0.00044111564,0.000111519264,0.00036439882,0.00069197384,0.00021704717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816245,0.00056603615,0.00023359273,0.00017124171,0.00057181204,0.00029478577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024290483,0.0009688395,0.00049600354,0.002395804,0.0017694463,0.004930173,0.000826297,0.0034422348,0.031697586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057340185,0.00040029443,0.0005447727,0.0012950863,0.00451341,0.0045317262,0.0025330996,0.00490731,0.013925873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007106575,0.000033018212,0.00036759904,0.00028135505,0.000009962732,0.00014770904,0.0006477223,0.00017438672,0.00018365201,0.26183194,0.6609519,0.075299725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034268292,0.000013815404,0.000372579,0.00018793815,0.0000020109662,0.00006363321,0.00006176802,0.000025587473,0.00006447663,0.017858295,0.9813399,0.0000065470485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005904552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055507272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031697586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005817863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00153628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10603905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2263943467","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1368003","title":"Outline of a Foucaultian Archaeology of Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Archaeology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.010350321154690726,"score_gpt":0.29460198537230853,"score_spread":0.2842516642176178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263943467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02334561,0.011439639,0.2225847,0.08060325,0.0020911966,0.0011699357,0.0012426057,0.0005004013,0.6570226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52234375,0.006864939,0.30998665,0.008078032,0.0010913261,0.0017357134,0.00056284794,0.00020122487,0.14913546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993124,0.00032085055,0.000037593978,0.00011247448,0.00012667631,0.00009005598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990681,0.00036225966,0.00007002783,0.0001438445,0.00022102281,0.0001348062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002808557,0.0004717467,0.0003601819,0.0028369345,0.004764701,0.0059614163,0.0017589134,0.0037940699,0.0089559285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029923182,0.00037180947,0.000424341,0.0014842475,0.015156829,0.0050004763,0.0025651495,0.0026167862,0.0017109058],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060919583,0.000009149893,0.000120011784,0.000019916708,8.5347284e-7,0.00007815149,0.0014795775,0.00006174562,0.000099031124,0.9916903,0.0023030024,0.0041322215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008947124,0.000017674585,0.00058833876,0.00019170741,0.000002491569,0.00034461523,0.0025532034,0.0006800161,0.0002779639,0.76191694,0.23340215,0.000015963364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071746497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009574125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0089559285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041875895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045648874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03038317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265614141","doi":"10.19092/reed.v3i1.101","title":"What counts as theory, today? A post-philosophical framework for socio-legal empirical research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Empirical legal studies; Epistemology; Empirical research; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Legal realism; Legal research; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Comparative law","score_opus":0.07263133560142479,"score_gpt":0.43469129002334556,"score_spread":0.36205995442192074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265614141","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0140400035,0.04046801,0.17521882,0.56004596,0.0069480026,0.00028526608,0.0003394944,0.00018760591,0.20246689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7993614,0.018132381,0.12606828,0.03449236,0.0070155067,0.001785037,0.00037457785,0.00032984896,0.012440663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709708,0.02256316,0.0011213154,0.002090907,0.0024711473,0.0007827953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9584994,0.028826928,0.0021276707,0.004520226,0.0038621165,0.0021635997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035274625,0.0015600243,0.0020458263,0.0085348105,0.008943025,0.025666175,0.0046589607,0.007819928,0.004054665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030258993,0.00072425435,0.0010099342,0.007393902,0.12322755,0.03846762,0.0069941184,0.0156070795,0.0011057747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002794884,0.000010035686,0.00007086321,0.000032827164,0.000002674176,0.000011660243,0.0020487425,0.00003775729,0.000016119056,0.9955467,0.0009880039,0.0012317351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070766805,0.000008945984,0.00009456266,0.0001412161,0.0000028169875,0.00002318476,0.0025248532,0.00024779353,0.000030055231,0.9784974,0.018415792,0.0000062978525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037517992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003205968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035274625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011195205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010000505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18655229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265673382","doi":"","title":"Spaces of Exception in Canadian Hate Crimes Legislation: Accounting for the Effects of Sexuality-Based Aggravation in R. V. Cran","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Commission; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Supreme court; Normative; Hate crime; Criminology; Element (criminal law); Identity (music); Sociology; History","score_opus":0.007990749432445656,"score_gpt":0.27360644054711075,"score_spread":0.2656156911146651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265673382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72847915,0.0029653,0.012243652,0.014800946,0.00043315688,0.00039973872,0.0015159324,0.0002622098,0.23889986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864001,0.0008573167,0.0037718986,0.0008351018,0.000069644244,0.000113215625,0.0002835179,0.00007826915,0.007591035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99059206,0.0018092655,0.00026723364,0.0007510444,0.0032653734,0.003315023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834215,0.0058992873,0.0030204696,0.0010146399,0.0047378875,0.001906182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047807163,0.00093601836,0.0010969234,0.004666644,0.01432634,0.0119338995,0.0046478994,0.0025446112,0.00633739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028830813,0.00072344736,0.00213701,0.0046540564,0.008141226,0.004289935,0.008386895,0.005483467,0.00037314816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030494327,0.00033329765,0.12684429,0.00024890088,0.00017137887,0.0014650676,0.020571355,0.0668062,0.0004674747,0.71800834,0.024214236,0.0405645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020886597,0.0005171578,0.39592373,0.0013200055,0.0020034665,0.00041821162,0.06634763,0.19625293,0.0017288411,0.13963184,0.19468041,0.0009669273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98838824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.110106036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.110106036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13643862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7988789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266177276","doi":"","title":"Where is the Law in Restorative Justice? - Taken from Book - Aboriginal Self-Government in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Local government; Legal profession; Sociology","score_opus":0.006741292420043937,"score_gpt":0.2452553241623884,"score_spread":0.23851403174234448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266177276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02294873,0.0996387,0.0020421937,0.12685987,0.005657104,0.0002022817,0.00092273,0.00018317797,0.7415452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30850837,0.058907874,0.003036533,0.013514612,0.0005682978,0.00008734079,0.0004272923,0.0001870652,0.6147626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984536,0.00016162108,0.000043199878,0.00017060303,0.0007282753,0.00044259205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988379,0.00019602974,0.000032536427,0.000024520488,0.0006334372,0.00027567276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092115666,0.00058735907,0.000505996,0.0015311211,0.022213183,0.010206987,0.0018689069,0.0020579894,0.012316646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019539078,0.00028383653,0.000292228,0.00450202,0.010893486,0.0028245756,0.001915951,0.0040304963,0.0013517387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031324504,0.000045904617,0.0036721416,0.00061418937,0.000012324368,0.00084004743,0.08101652,0.000613629,0.00041775248,0.4279655,0.40682226,0.07794843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034969569,0.000008108414,0.00435924,0.00041287337,0.000011367284,0.00017262674,0.036826074,0.00018062991,0.0001564585,0.008370671,0.94946676,0.000031668133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99490696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99831176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15228137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15228137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18080515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98323345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267378069","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Gay Male Pornography: An Issue of Sex Discrimination, by Christopher N. Kendall","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Harm; Gender studies; Sexual orientation; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.006847311843577802,"score_gpt":0.2860219891314319,"score_spread":0.2791746772878541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267378069","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009402816,0.7743477,0.00012477084,0.08189359,0.1288725,0.000029709705,0.000114382114,0.000048680504,0.014474626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014025184,0.6566752,0.00018971918,0.102726616,0.15688477,0.000098797136,0.0002557227,0.00008443993,0.081682116],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886996,0.000155368,0.00008624504,0.00016525546,0.0006462058,0.00007696182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99538463,0.0021210145,0.00040712816,0.00011107536,0.0013943224,0.0005817355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010530334,0.0015974994,0.0021091097,0.0025739172,0.0015888988,0.0051696263,0.0030479855,0.0078683905,0.030874426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075740144,0.0008100225,0.0009177786,0.004279387,0.0022081526,0.0045137675,0.0018269627,0.008851705,0.020526553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053000626,0.0000060045436,0.000024573612,0.0003346055,0.000003016183,0.000019922325,0.000016977127,0.000014562703,0.000015015016,0.00026334578,0.9848298,0.014466853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009158614,0.000012082492,0.00022742027,0.0010021816,0.0000067650512,0.00023593048,0.000042775606,0.000015921154,0.000011820804,0.00032305834,0.99810517,0.000007709584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011169244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025915442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030874426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003044801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004642487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10328525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2267955537","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2347374","title":"LLHonorable Louise Charron: une analyse quantitative comparre de sa jurisprudence (The Hon. Louise Charron: A Comparative Quantitative Analysis of Her Jurisrpudence)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02948646577047184,"score_gpt":0.3449841211064271,"score_spread":0.3154976553359553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2267955537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14454676,0.08659512,0.07504312,0.25694188,0.002795393,0.00031011796,0.0021045266,0.0005599043,0.4311031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85628563,0.011556652,0.02066686,0.00972887,0.0010442989,0.00065797503,0.00044049622,0.0005619549,0.09905738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808795,0.013268253,0.00032897308,0.0009972469,0.004093857,0.00043225026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96182925,0.029730897,0.0014230151,0.00092857925,0.005576377,0.0005119328],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012520496,0.00043112718,0.00048999814,0.0056812237,0.0064841677,0.009474291,0.0010151771,0.0024798915,0.010454158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03586666,0.00040501956,0.00041797326,0.0062628384,0.007897662,0.008073046,0.003251862,0.0046495013,0.000966038],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008319929,0.00007841682,0.002747368,0.00038191822,0.00004993788,0.00024914826,0.050793793,0.00028685105,0.00080997177,0.8211355,0.06439848,0.058985442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023708471,0.00006358781,0.017727545,0.0012259415,0.00003397261,0.0004397047,0.043083914,0.0013170212,0.0017515273,0.10906097,0.8251587,0.000113437876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050251387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05809382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015093708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070123635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109513044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268174555","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Why Law Matters by Alon Harel","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Sketch; Law; Corporate governance; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Economics; Philosophy; Management; Social psychology","score_opus":0.009914223893447824,"score_gpt":0.27366779888689596,"score_spread":0.26375357499344815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268174555","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000788213,0.85625196,0.00017977794,0.10231694,0.030226486,0.000009324547,0.000070349175,0.000020990696,0.010845322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002771225,0.8156021,0.0003072861,0.09479951,0.055193264,0.00004204882,0.00014568574,0.00007071733,0.031068172],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984365,0.0004294608,0.00010486459,0.0002400988,0.00069004943,0.0000989405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915747,0.0053934036,0.0004542,0.00017047596,0.0019950867,0.00041225334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002090356,0.00089015334,0.0014708128,0.0033895932,0.0010902185,0.005207053,0.0014873474,0.0050654504,0.01606387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010753784,0.0006323532,0.00055896933,0.005665498,0.0025968675,0.0055589196,0.0014471511,0.007532266,0.012343602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075429107,0.00000574567,0.00003392111,0.0006686525,0.000008866074,0.000023811894,0.0000714839,0.000049281876,0.000023987805,0.006970755,0.96434605,0.027789978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007128973,0.0000053563267,0.000096172145,0.0015183181,0.000006024981,0.00007328766,0.000052351555,0.000019833455,0.000014673294,0.004350532,0.9938486,0.000007686529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062829675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0116403485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01606387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036790087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054899957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05373901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269330437","doi":"","title":"Converging Queer and Feminist Legal Theories: Family Feuds and Family Ties","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Sociology; Gender studies; Family ties; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.009873051660744384,"score_gpt":0.2594312518430734,"score_spread":0.24955820018232905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269330437","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11392825,0.036060434,0.0113389855,0.17986183,0.0005712483,0.000051373183,0.000090253685,0.000036777135,0.65806085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696313,0.009190761,0.0011325023,0.004041949,0.00025622774,0.00005758994,0.00003009067,0.00001840462,0.01564122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99506384,0.0031708672,0.00008662808,0.00035151644,0.0006722489,0.0006549957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935115,0.004441074,0.0005206921,0.00024813245,0.00052676175,0.00075187196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073622977,0.00046234502,0.00050615467,0.0054481043,0.01942527,0.011062579,0.0022455202,0.0050602336,0.0077405865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009678247,0.00026407716,0.00032265484,0.0028652276,0.0665857,0.01553736,0.007028273,0.0046770163,0.0003578697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027729432,0.000009662512,0.0003523034,0.0000093232375,0.0000013332136,0.00008618314,0.03597682,0.000054099866,0.0000058568216,0.9580799,0.0011652054,0.004256508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000837957,0.000012469412,0.001358316,0.00040618068,0.0000077129835,0.00015249799,0.115520634,0.0004305953,0.000059186168,0.7948967,0.08713371,0.00001355089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054170385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05200105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054170385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02161246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074190265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1568101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269429033","doi":"10.1177/a018600","title":"Colonization through Disclosure: Confidential Records, Sexual Assault Complainants and Canadian Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Sexual assault; Legislature; Narrative; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.047718160511811686,"score_gpt":0.3478209934648231,"score_spread":0.30010283295301143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269429033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6913654,0.010051442,0.00068553607,0.08574335,0.00036494515,0.00006033313,0.0002917073,0.000043373017,0.21139386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9775643,0.0040822607,0.00018782292,0.0036670282,0.000048622103,0.000013903961,0.00005168131,0.000018749388,0.014365651],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942583,0.0011547568,0.00014233548,0.00032984593,0.0022801799,0.0018345198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99217844,0.003282101,0.00097279483,0.0002594676,0.0018362093,0.0014708646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031777509,0.00032586118,0.00035337996,0.0029371602,0.040598147,0.013101632,0.001985335,0.0030821708,0.008764151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014753561,0.0004237082,0.00020717036,0.006075431,0.03511577,0.004289373,0.008029472,0.0041905674,0.0003160748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019423198,0.00002296682,0.0045789266,0.00007808923,0.0000043565724,0.00094930734,0.9200083,0.000059464237,0.00030304946,0.049338106,0.00920706,0.015430986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008441162,0.000019557645,0.010309012,0.00023159113,0.000011274386,0.00050096196,0.80178475,0.000086006046,0.00020606394,0.0028174066,0.1839561,0.00006888191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9913106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10657964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10657964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14583841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.773293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269485834","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.27.2.157","title":"Edward Greenspan: A Feminist Reflection on the Eulogies Surrounding His Death","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Criminology; Reflection (computer programming); Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Sexual assault; Law; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.09050535326923154,"score_gpt":0.30617153508879663,"score_spread":0.2156661818195651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269485834","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004777474,0.019949805,0.00031883543,0.94156945,0.011599871,0.0000064189694,0.0000296749,0.000011722326,0.02173678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17668098,0.017309913,0.00045412735,0.72555065,0.00972978,0.000037592883,0.000025241703,0.00012214106,0.070089504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936265,0.0030646648,0.00012084009,0.00067525683,0.0012393146,0.0012734024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919224,0.0056630787,0.00041554123,0.00011563614,0.0009487658,0.0009345528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006651577,0.000787251,0.0008009101,0.0007802433,0.029915094,0.007747608,0.0022216865,0.018600978,0.00447499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01463661,0.00047130554,0.00042822174,0.0011530976,0.033685528,0.006215876,0.00493274,0.023330485,0.0007105336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039007624,0.000006125812,0.000329859,0.00015047393,0.000008729606,0.001467408,0.12962274,0.00013622713,0.00019416235,0.10386787,0.7578974,0.0062800623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033990493,0.000007690082,0.00038849402,0.00035293426,0.0000033010006,0.00028836523,0.05040669,0.000029104054,0.00011921857,0.004739282,0.9436356,0.000025961013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28919747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44330925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71080256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023707256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5750283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269844230","doi":"","title":"Film as a Complement to the Written Text: Reflections on Using the Sterilization of Leilani Muir to Teach Muir V. Alberta, Adjin-Tettey, Elizabeth & Kodar, Freya","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Eugenics; Law; Imprisonment; Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.050184888703961,"score_gpt":0.3459134006422113,"score_spread":0.29572851193825034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269844230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7698815,0.007009282,0.0038657465,0.04633533,0.0033082704,0.00033428744,0.00018192659,0.00020193652,0.16888174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93282014,0.004947574,0.0024594045,0.0063082133,0.00051908684,0.0001813612,0.00010240021,0.0002827765,0.052379023],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938186,0.004484154,0.000083266365,0.0002444393,0.0006315175,0.0007379035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920786,0.0060534375,0.00039895956,0.0002219254,0.00048161106,0.0007654941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004053477,0.0010182575,0.00070079963,0.0014360033,0.022036066,0.009778893,0.0021130412,0.0039176787,0.0074464343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015947916,0.00077623344,0.00041730903,0.001567188,0.017240549,0.004635919,0.0066669732,0.009137813,0.00095175224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003564955,0.00008881592,0.00035081443,0.000119455624,0.0000052737414,0.0014291597,0.9758691,0.00005386588,0.0014411869,0.005043665,0.008391955,0.0071711293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014285675,0.00009033277,0.00087140885,0.00025823363,0.0000123798445,0.0005054802,0.8792665,0.00007437612,0.00091990596,0.0006488001,0.11731619,0.000022067332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045306392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10637597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9546936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008875041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040151756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09008533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270115274","doi":"","title":"R v Campbell: Rethinking the Admissibility of Rap Lyrics in Criminal Cases","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Lyrics; Relevance (law); Supreme court; Race (biology); Value (mathematics); Criminology; Criminal trial; Law; Political science; Phenomenon; Criminal justice; Psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Epistemology; Literature; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02900868267602022,"score_gpt":0.3119028357099399,"score_spread":0.2828941530339196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270115274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20871794,0.008748339,0.015644766,0.31556264,0.0032249824,0.0003581025,0.000120997,0.00019177847,0.4474304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9398017,0.002132546,0.0064229597,0.038894225,0.0005534144,0.00015578659,0.000031692554,0.000087126726,0.011920494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94338226,0.027501553,0.0026139077,0.0037442076,0.01759835,0.0051596984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8659582,0.097848035,0.005460985,0.0050110067,0.021241507,0.0044802646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05726175,0.00048350237,0.0008143686,0.00543575,0.03079107,0.015454191,0.0056989966,0.014338277,0.0022975686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18800478,0.0007989499,0.00058555696,0.0029311965,0.057015665,0.012301986,0.009206042,0.019257525,0.00044643364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059149195,0.000034850633,0.005974396,0.0001712151,0.000022006532,0.0009566936,0.13759282,0.00027607073,0.0005404198,0.77325726,0.03551621,0.045598794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006331033,0.00021915269,0.026377792,0.004363932,0.0002732536,0.0019223628,0.2310383,0.0026549336,0.0047565056,0.29663283,0.43119135,0.00050629984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43874216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64588594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56125784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026258357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06817593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8723768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270342821","doi":"","title":"Henri Lefebvre: Spatial politics, everyday life and the right to the city [Book Review]","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social alternatives","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Everyday life; Right to the city; Sociology; Project commissioning; Urban politics; Publishing; Media studies; Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Art; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015547549673652936,"score_gpt":0.30567328570028823,"score_spread":0.2901257360266353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270342821","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000055906938,0.9759025,0.00019929605,0.010612208,0.0036640149,0.0000072085145,0.000041093426,0.000011208334,0.009506578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001934566,0.962993,0.00029527975,0.007365887,0.0042463737,0.000027593627,0.00011748555,0.000024588879,0.022995338],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990325,0.00027768186,0.000046492292,0.00013260421,0.00042283963,0.00008797782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876547,0.0006730658,0.00007709121,0.000036945963,0.00037097695,0.00007649668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008645946,0.0013907049,0.001801822,0.0036907762,0.0011902382,0.0039305203,0.001735303,0.0038644224,0.016337024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002653375,0.0006168146,0.00061786396,0.0056379586,0.0028258397,0.0059878407,0.0018800219,0.004186458,0.007575431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011428327,0.000007861325,0.00006417381,0.002127068,0.000020771571,0.00007796984,0.00035121248,0.00011765574,0.000070812814,0.011528643,0.8572563,0.12836604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034038196,0.0000056143426,0.00032251253,0.0027297942,0.000009691227,0.00023458566,0.00023396163,0.000019827463,0.000033198547,0.0039533493,0.99244237,0.000011721779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027779244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040375434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027779244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028639596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049146013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055235088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270851133","doi":"","title":"Sexuality, Queer Theory and 'Feminism After': Reading and Rereading the Sexual Subject","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Sadomasochism; Queer theory; Human sexuality; Queer; Trespass; Gender studies; Sociology; Subject (documents); Sexual revolution; Discipline; Feminist theory; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.014256260468789162,"score_gpt":0.2694844961723081,"score_spread":0.25522823570351894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270851133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10283994,0.10463771,0.013951027,0.25810662,0.009865341,0.000094135954,0.00010436011,0.0001213523,0.51027954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8997158,0.022716083,0.0019728465,0.0136658,0.0027780153,0.00006901215,0.000043620406,0.00016126651,0.05887756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996256,0.002941707,0.000048240607,0.00012465377,0.0003216226,0.0003078512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995139,0.004051616,0.00020687157,0.00017156357,0.00025363168,0.00017728562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003993744,0.0006378739,0.00061175064,0.002496279,0.009988859,0.011758052,0.0013104647,0.004254892,0.003167192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062878877,0.00024897695,0.00034862236,0.0018503837,0.060585946,0.008390746,0.00257946,0.0072406325,0.00033871375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019222434,0.00001717323,0.00034802436,0.00010894322,0.0000066085818,0.0005016602,0.34558603,0.00010612149,0.00027423425,0.622864,0.016141161,0.014026853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009633058,0.000040677463,0.001178409,0.0006801628,0.000009457238,0.00039802812,0.34107322,0.00017477016,0.0006557411,0.22968137,0.42607716,0.000021332753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.070312105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011433744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005479859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11802101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271109635","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900003908","title":"How the New ICTs Matter to the Theory of Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Legal positivism; Positivism; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Allegiance; Sociology; Legal profession; Law and economics; Legal realism","score_opus":0.019784844106262117,"score_gpt":0.26392726989390525,"score_spread":0.24414242578764314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271109635","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038100895,0.046687726,0.03530143,0.5258121,0.0020972479,0.000049012702,0.0001698051,0.0001234328,0.3516585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9363652,0.019224804,0.007949837,0.020120094,0.002816281,0.000121146084,0.00009031225,0.00008509154,0.013227418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99017954,0.005724478,0.0002439008,0.0012291907,0.001775106,0.0008478985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98283374,0.012444529,0.00078464363,0.0014652524,0.001424989,0.001046904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010330746,0.00047068304,0.0008532018,0.0033700222,0.004827515,0.014946285,0.0020095205,0.007205168,0.0051317126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017692905,0.00057223096,0.00083344744,0.0021009264,0.08082809,0.024378626,0.0038495355,0.010143507,0.0008188191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030666308,0.000006666891,0.00010891676,0.000017685417,0.0000027370313,0.000016053935,0.00059683,0.00019715582,0.000009750502,0.9967809,0.00080794154,0.0014522845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057034067,0.0000043067676,0.00014001266,0.000047243306,0.0000031989246,0.000015621978,0.000407109,0.00031985802,0.000017854865,0.98607963,0.012953404,0.0000060387347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017086767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069270893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017086767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011105379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062220204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080575526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271257012","doi":"10.21991/c9qh3s","title":"MARSHALLING THE RULE OF LAW IN CANADA: OF EELS AND HONOUR","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marshalling; Honour; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.030698061441809744,"score_gpt":0.2435154940380979,"score_spread":0.21281743259628816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271257012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18934599,0.028676614,0.004510856,0.34012383,0.001452399,0.00013605064,0.00059854006,0.000119102886,0.43503654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8792578,0.009200483,0.0020533812,0.015704988,0.00023372995,0.000046460034,0.00013342855,0.00014330186,0.09322653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881579,0.0013220535,0.00023349632,0.0008929071,0.0035255495,0.0058681015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98550385,0.00338392,0.0005735743,0.00041268958,0.00622424,0.003901659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007413972,0.00059842574,0.0009162822,0.0036445477,0.046525314,0.024164984,0.0034668862,0.0064624823,0.00863445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02371528,0.0008524769,0.0007142662,0.0062468187,0.03325833,0.008734854,0.007217533,0.012430187,0.00041913395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006849414,0.000043838085,0.005587949,0.00012711855,0.000041816515,0.0003965808,0.049278926,0.0011652429,0.00019341182,0.81638795,0.08014747,0.046561293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043520788,0.000027117469,0.02627388,0.00073669414,0.0000896954,0.00014243621,0.09662179,0.0019299033,0.000645604,0.106905475,0.76623744,0.0003465403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9988292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2950182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2950182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.48167914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.817679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271356809","doi":"","title":"The Defence of Belief in Consent: Guidelines and Jury Instructions for Application of Criminal Code Section 265(4)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Jury; Law; Statutory law; Appeal; Section (typography); Political science; Criminal law; Common law; Psychology; Criminal procedure; Subject (documents); Computer science","score_opus":0.02796454707836751,"score_gpt":0.3381216659194527,"score_spread":0.3101571188410852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271356809","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030442363,0.009779468,0.37982023,0.24274588,0.012574677,0.073525235,0.005935477,0.010759629,0.23441696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07995746,0.008354954,0.66752696,0.07928403,0.004473322,0.061640736,0.0030694716,0.0008945036,0.09479852],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.873323,0.05941759,0.03308543,0.0038602012,0.024170063,0.0061437855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82096523,0.121404745,0.010606164,0.0077555696,0.035283722,0.003984539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.108864576,0.0019023528,0.0021397695,0.0065871538,0.0068055135,0.008635066,0.006906549,0.045874987,0.006323412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20084737,0.0046524,0.0023416055,0.003265279,0.009160309,0.0061352476,0.0051449705,0.019046675,0.013668634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003173742,0.0009042606,0.0026817997,0.0013870161,0.000043434073,0.0027631067,0.019487431,0.0052854875,0.005504784,0.20453668,0.6351305,0.12195815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004962333,0.0013145776,0.011138608,0.008077272,0.000093660696,0.0028841535,0.0069746017,0.012917222,0.0041706767,0.10268733,0.84816253,0.0010830346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023715727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046518672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108864576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008269639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04368166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5757378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271372791","doi":"","title":"Sean Lawrence, Forgiving the Gift: The Philosophy of Generosity in Shakespeare and Marlowe (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 2012)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Early modern literary studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Art; Art history; Performance art; Media studies; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology; Psychology","score_opus":0.029066757230617683,"score_gpt":0.25308648849386745,"score_spread":0.22401973126324976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271372791","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031505986,0.72591984,0.002140423,0.1908093,0.004137896,0.000034294695,0.00024637292,0.000062866144,0.07349836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20635736,0.46493647,0.0053090844,0.09264056,0.00821363,0.00028938337,0.00023252738,0.00033596985,0.22168508],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998516,0.00086808216,0.00008513386,0.00014957454,0.0002624339,0.00011875866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99685955,0.0022830178,0.00013201669,0.0000886346,0.0004397985,0.00019694473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003022781,0.0013530388,0.0008845276,0.002689035,0.0092729665,0.008104997,0.0019987433,0.011832485,0.008935003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051497417,0.0009667506,0.00041477356,0.0040054834,0.012350605,0.014744393,0.0023165685,0.0075522787,0.0024484792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050271225,0.000049401864,0.0006201241,0.00040728485,0.000023478184,0.0002308239,0.022817956,0.00016152387,0.00009386411,0.38285333,0.5578072,0.03488466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004463093,0.000023501088,0.0027553372,0.0016401915,0.000024250354,0.00031986865,0.018504795,0.0001788782,0.00023861811,0.17690887,0.7992997,0.00006138749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09363303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2501014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09363303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006435681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005169379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18617606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271414262","doi":"","title":"'Put on Shows that Will Enthrall Them': Producers as Authors of Motion Pictures","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Supreme court; Motion (physics); Variety (cybernetics); Determinative; Perspective (graphical); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Copyright law; Certainty; Task (project management); Term (time); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Intellectual property; Sociology; Economics; Epistemology; Management; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030747567517227938,"score_gpt":0.27588500234211194,"score_spread":0.245137434824884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271414262","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040878844,0.0021278285,0.0098696165,0.09008788,0.0012760325,0.000085622545,0.00014294744,0.00018544786,0.8553458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7906069,0.0014008862,0.002774022,0.009707131,0.00035195175,0.00006210452,0.00004511939,0.00016746628,0.19488446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968677,0.0013044706,0.000060853778,0.00034001027,0.00095252617,0.00047449887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954692,0.0017115925,0.00042957757,0.00041343286,0.0015305532,0.00044554978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037009232,0.00046054204,0.00020308666,0.0010592857,0.02093818,0.013781813,0.001094859,0.0055088378,0.01447769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01319301,0.0004910256,0.00024270444,0.0011176139,0.020148097,0.009887737,0.0037030566,0.0041338815,0.0026533725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023512624,0.000009083851,0.0013319287,0.000047226393,0.00000476356,0.0007119432,0.19967684,0.00007467311,0.00048653342,0.7186218,0.06629767,0.012714008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000150466685,0.000015366519,0.0016711596,0.00018883204,0.000024260982,0.00042604833,0.08839035,0.00034643698,0.000985243,0.036792602,0.8710942,0.00005047221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36348844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51219195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36348844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013340655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010618238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7227454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272458717","doi":"","title":"R v Andalib-Goortani: Authentication and The Internet","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Internet privacy; Authentication (law); Context (archaeology); Upload; Computer security; Social media; Political science; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.006464983428217938,"score_gpt":0.25350521398826775,"score_spread":0.2470402305600498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272458717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067116626,0.0116108265,0.0068315566,0.20204778,0.0011388328,0.00011386986,0.00007660282,0.00010588188,0.7109579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89301986,0.0036501824,0.0018418824,0.032888535,0.00042523214,0.00006312259,0.000018252405,0.000028899902,0.06806404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971136,0.001202769,0.00008215089,0.00029350983,0.00077653234,0.00053143053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800104,0.0011539414,0.00018300531,0.00019068345,0.00036870383,0.000102660786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025163598,0.00027979104,0.00023883961,0.00083544047,0.007792628,0.0050044493,0.0010439189,0.010493175,0.0048070718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007867895,0.0001807199,0.00028630218,0.00085596344,0.011334596,0.00429639,0.002500149,0.0045491853,0.0008781185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001857633,0.000012367707,0.00067842513,0.00003507716,0.000004433963,0.00096117065,0.0049357847,0.00013988577,0.00015858484,0.956219,0.02849901,0.008337704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050898543,0.000057667192,0.0039695855,0.0008901317,0.000043133023,0.0031072088,0.016781356,0.0023003106,0.0020365515,0.45968938,0.51096743,0.00010629333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06501358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061109893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06501358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050975205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005616086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12927032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2272474961","doi":"","title":"From Written Record to Memory in the Law of Wills","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Probate; Law; Legislature; Perspective (graphical); Compliance (psychology); Living Wills; Common law; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.009337198826772489,"score_gpt":0.26870279914026063,"score_spread":0.25936560031348815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272474961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08532276,0.01115617,0.009281164,0.10842342,0.00094802066,0.00006891994,0.00026439218,0.0000920978,0.784443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91835386,0.00265509,0.0014244096,0.005777395,0.0003065497,0.000045245713,0.000053813896,0.000040662642,0.071342945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481106,0.0023116728,0.00023619064,0.00063342124,0.0009747329,0.0010329348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98810905,0.0069629536,0.00087177556,0.0012866075,0.0021985108,0.0005711124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005978998,0.00025014812,0.00036586073,0.0016393656,0.010484371,0.015757205,0.001621343,0.004713092,0.010948387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01860708,0.00036709927,0.00026230258,0.002093126,0.0579668,0.01049468,0.0043196524,0.004898948,0.0007420512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014092302,0.0000068892086,0.0004826165,0.000026871288,0.0000025972652,0.00011865693,0.013121273,0.000089525696,0.00004892909,0.9730704,0.0059701363,0.0070480807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004050972,0.000059733975,0.0036053017,0.00088191184,0.000029611776,0.0003911934,0.043769386,0.0006753996,0.0007587309,0.5278529,0.42182752,0.00010778079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48328736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45384824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48328736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02426381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022342214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96094865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274192619","doi":"","title":"Categories and Concepts: Mapping Maps in Western Legal Thought","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal realism; Empirical legal studies; Political science; Legal research; Conflict of laws; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007797378311553879,"score_gpt":0.2662557907955621,"score_spread":0.25845841248400825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274192619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09249957,0.03310371,0.1201701,0.021897431,0.0005409618,0.00011766995,0.0003453911,0.0002998001,0.7310254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9405255,0.005297703,0.037544213,0.0005866427,0.00013070035,0.00012666668,0.00013819197,0.0000980197,0.015552271],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983461,0.001121232,0.000052494062,0.00015069183,0.00022900251,0.00010046466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826413,0.0011733345,0.00013030424,0.00019647209,0.00015723419,0.00007853343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023482074,0.0003907469,0.0003284427,0.0051748944,0.0033892228,0.008277844,0.0006274078,0.0010422792,0.0038277293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050886385,0.00036632127,0.00025203027,0.009067566,0.03243372,0.011847136,0.0028275857,0.0012827751,0.00029005934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000656564,0.0000027733727,0.00036624496,0.000039739443,0.0000028134384,0.000025800198,0.034747344,0.00015984052,0.000045265733,0.94784343,0.0021685632,0.014591613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042375773,0.0000044084345,0.0012388742,0.000115910814,0.0000033238105,0.000056090477,0.027245944,0.00073517615,0.000076643715,0.90029776,0.070212394,0.000009257345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027247027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031012198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027247027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061998195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024778917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054176807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2275743081","doi":"10.14288/1.0108989","title":"How far can the law go?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Far right; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.017154682569530906,"score_gpt":0.1806100308594032,"score_spread":0.1634553482898723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2275743081","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002352582,0.020543884,0.00094431464,0.6607073,0.006412827,0.000024907484,0.00056351686,0.00020384604,0.30824685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16870768,0.04286766,0.0038268792,0.2076902,0.006885489,0.00012815272,0.0014095221,0.00040192876,0.5680825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985164,0.00031995177,0.00006599631,0.00013598676,0.00067143195,0.00029028908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506086,0.0010672694,0.00023743347,0.00037210566,0.0025779875,0.000684345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017455925,0.00043358313,0.0006450754,0.0013152781,0.006128329,0.011224285,0.00092651416,0.005955517,0.08133731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014030845,0.00031737352,0.0004063997,0.0011523898,0.007684113,0.012560411,0.0020653817,0.006346829,0.03281092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027978469,0.000031290143,0.00077759236,0.00015477245,0.000013795495,0.00009626946,0.0004931855,0.00007843539,0.00016660543,0.11660838,0.7921631,0.08938857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000085302245,0.000018598614,0.0024173905,0.00076089706,0.00001559537,0.00009299503,0.0046028043,0.00008773295,0.00023797601,0.057511568,0.9342119,0.000034004282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083432764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.117358066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083432764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052420306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00744128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2721004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278231847","doi":"","title":"Practicing Justice by Practicing Method: A Brief Rethinking of Feminist Analytics of Obscenity and Indecency Law in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Counterpoint; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Law; Sociology; Tone (literature); Governmentality; Political science; Politics; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014001884113319193,"score_gpt":0.3145632658596173,"score_spread":0.3005613817462981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278231847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16562802,0.021982454,0.021622192,0.2121163,0.0012061837,0.00029315072,0.0004618955,0.00013664494,0.5765532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95371586,0.009025389,0.0055799214,0.008470055,0.00023224819,0.00009514083,0.00007162058,0.00018011304,0.022629645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99049824,0.0032774806,0.00016436298,0.0006532719,0.0031616823,0.0022448783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856338,0.009502886,0.00066977204,0.0004034738,0.0029600468,0.0008300037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009996062,0.0007809783,0.00086765894,0.0050272592,0.037348356,0.016980294,0.0037275087,0.0044048782,0.005049866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016540613,0.00056386774,0.0005268671,0.007673303,0.06104029,0.0057824966,0.005104245,0.0075031277,0.00023572372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001834865,0.000018200808,0.0018497306,0.00015025811,0.000009522123,0.00044920624,0.24199489,0.00029908222,0.00035021536,0.7273968,0.009291646,0.018172188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018768384,0.000024360192,0.012018426,0.0013239803,0.0000389774,0.00026412858,0.33757445,0.0016524994,0.00094420364,0.09978508,0.54623735,0.00011777668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9831218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99068123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18991391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18991391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18488616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93958503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2278485399","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511615887.004","title":"Introduction to Smoothing","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Content (measure theory); Smoothing; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Computer vision","score_opus":0.018972288643997075,"score_gpt":0.21933263018670185,"score_spread":0.20036034154270477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2278485399","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007169825,0.0068537435,0.96316326,0.0014368548,0.0008811394,0.00010029399,0.0015706166,0.004587061,0.020689985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04212464,0.015558203,0.83361536,0.0017656597,0.003233296,0.0007210789,0.0070872395,0.0090771485,0.086817496],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968766,0.0010100341,0.00022966201,0.0007481944,0.0009541858,0.00018135823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99243754,0.0040184786,0.00019788538,0.0017004642,0.0015074317,0.00013817921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042481557,0.0016469792,0.0018099698,0.0028375094,0.001112416,0.003605583,0.0028692724,0.0019392413,0.08687504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023274455,0.0010465987,0.0023130092,0.0052318936,0.0012417708,0.0040972102,0.0022006251,0.0034798805,0.04572319],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106510386,0.00008454973,0.0007002383,0.00055396213,0.0001916858,0.00009742329,0.00018233851,0.021268133,0.0013059305,0.15977517,0.20055465,0.61517936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043626056,0.000048863247,0.0015938433,0.00032779857,0.00008003249,0.00032269128,0.00010009731,0.10448417,0.0025818709,0.4821198,0.40819576,0.0001014404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076261996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08687504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014719071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019834435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29062593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279173580","doi":"","title":"Not a Lust Story: Judicial Imaginaries of Sexual Citizenship","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"The Imaginary; Human sexuality; Chauvinism; Lust; Prerogative; Harm; Gender studies; Citizenship; Political science; Sociology; Sexual identity; Normative; Law; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.014316658446375854,"score_gpt":0.2825667082993407,"score_spread":0.26825004985296486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279173580","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12324274,0.0071926895,0.0049346644,0.30050722,0.0007741008,0.000036667985,0.000100751175,0.000050635757,0.5631605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98054975,0.0011498485,0.000366955,0.007827522,0.00016760874,0.0000105775,0.00001769792,0.000025234764,0.009884744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934853,0.0030705992,0.000092329705,0.00046130046,0.0014435223,0.0014468825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941375,0.0034031852,0.0003423122,0.00035320717,0.0011816223,0.0005822011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069428943,0.0004181773,0.00043785543,0.0017411354,0.024789985,0.01433664,0.0018281274,0.0064982697,0.003467445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012921835,0.000302402,0.00034086662,0.0013662942,0.09023494,0.008301406,0.003922879,0.009654415,0.00027837924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008019528,0.0000055532905,0.00038984983,0.000015109495,0.0000025551458,0.00023836052,0.1023979,0.00006478516,0.00009016687,0.88499004,0.009043083,0.0027545935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019417665,0.000018933626,0.0013545009,0.00030387263,0.000017090235,0.00051829993,0.36930373,0.00057254126,0.00047034066,0.3189478,0.3084166,0.00005685326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5019442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.506895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5019442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026013067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019432064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279361506","doi":"","title":"Using Film in the Classroom","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Complement (music); Legal education; Sociology; Mathematics education; Law; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.02119207078392787,"score_gpt":0.3134326568307128,"score_spread":0.29224058604678493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279361506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095304035,0.026882173,0.0151928,0.10223716,0.015188066,0.00022948961,0.0005753796,0.0011474404,0.7432434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72897106,0.028129386,0.009644291,0.014199632,0.0064375494,0.00028441896,0.00036606137,0.0009768264,0.21099083],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994266,0.0033456692,0.0002141599,0.00065231574,0.00081070047,0.0007112097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99526983,0.0021574125,0.00032337892,0.00048575865,0.0004334779,0.001329977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032238828,0.000683794,0.00054450665,0.0016447988,0.009663228,0.010342439,0.0012581599,0.0032406098,0.03458854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009518304,0.00039206626,0.0003692804,0.0009270108,0.0061684716,0.013515558,0.0075877155,0.004203934,0.005635206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008213071,0.0004956896,0.0039649783,0.00090480235,0.00003569173,0.0020781013,0.27350956,0.00017787344,0.006991139,0.10652553,0.34349817,0.26173633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010830052,0.00006641998,0.0011637931,0.00036919684,0.000008400169,0.00051412237,0.044838924,0.00006620257,0.001265672,0.005435855,0.9462394,0.000021313917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031756295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010282598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03458854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022325453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013276903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1157102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279575662","doi":"","title":"Susan Wolf and Christopher Grau, eds. , Understanding Love: Philosophy, Film, and Fiction . Reviewed by","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Contemporary philosophy; Art history; Art; Literature; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03466479466900495,"score_gpt":0.28002599241600235,"score_spread":0.24536119774699738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279575662","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024385483,0.9586642,0.00019647561,0.020587448,0.009184981,0.000006288382,0.00005186847,0.000011822773,0.011053108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027000976,0.97886664,0.00016923461,0.0016739924,0.00448605,0.000009842765,0.00005452911,0.000010749027,0.012028855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994543,0.00018514307,0.000051183808,0.00006670091,0.00020856413,0.000033981694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997053,0.0016728685,0.0001894645,0.0000642353,0.00077327795,0.00024713847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011826729,0.0015762292,0.0012044854,0.0026713745,0.0014430616,0.0026828898,0.0011665595,0.0024298318,0.023155244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004171102,0.0007214583,0.0004258099,0.0030422038,0.00176256,0.0052869185,0.0013996449,0.0037117503,0.010360962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036758447,0.00001570132,0.00019305765,0.0018466316,0.000019837848,0.00012379691,0.0013369009,0.00014461625,0.000109513894,0.007439981,0.79279244,0.19594076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008201453,0.000012161232,0.0012847265,0.0033003902,0.00001646088,0.0005069967,0.0015881043,0.000068748035,0.00007651134,0.0033400157,0.98978114,0.000016580003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009841763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022650877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023155244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011817984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026157047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07746202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2279755148","doi":"10.7202/1034463ar","title":"Quelques réflexions sur le silence et le droit : essai de systématisation","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Humanities; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.02090949694052119,"score_gpt":0.26666839307132245,"score_spread":0.24575889613080126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2279755148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053057034,0.020008678,0.08743949,0.11245241,0.0025974496,0.00015543123,0.0002563999,0.0002442349,0.72378886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91014785,0.006038168,0.014257832,0.0061486876,0.001119805,0.0002585557,0.0001583132,0.00026847003,0.061602313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99141735,0.0054086633,0.0003951794,0.0009817572,0.0012534654,0.0005435912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99410444,0.003247519,0.00046416148,0.0008330537,0.0011262094,0.00022465707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008297113,0.0008543346,0.0006282793,0.0025231696,0.0069173924,0.013794138,0.0019246176,0.0038367985,0.0056455266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009302179,0.00044429884,0.00066829234,0.0020588778,0.05220802,0.01201431,0.00494777,0.007720813,0.00084325235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006749451,0.0000028777833,0.00010982121,0.000030166979,0.000003141838,0.000045206907,0.023415016,0.00006677836,0.000086413165,0.97215897,0.0010407753,0.0030341034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002217644,0.000026863707,0.0007527272,0.0003718744,0.000020067098,0.00020093536,0.024856718,0.0007308395,0.00061236805,0.7228771,0.24948247,0.00004589367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019507661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016292213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019507661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010554033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007932209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07657522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281314087","doi":"","title":"Introduction to 'Queer Theory: Law, Culture, Empire'","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Empire; Scrutiny; Privilege (computing); Law; Queer theory; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.012011851028824305,"score_gpt":0.2791966900853925,"score_spread":0.2671848390565682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281314087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016116002,0.102340534,0.012046426,0.054737557,0.011164267,0.00012664436,0.0012143205,0.00049287104,0.8162658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054987546,0.13960709,0.011009717,0.019102668,0.014566601,0.00041325897,0.0020088982,0.00090972614,0.7573945],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990734,0.00032612312,0.000043220385,0.000086818116,0.0003867884,0.00008361456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981116,0.001283115,0.00008705309,0.000114762996,0.00029129296,0.00011209639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086354284,0.0007160079,0.00065273594,0.0023027423,0.0035375012,0.0052667568,0.0011876249,0.0017049934,0.051338147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030180395,0.0003687448,0.0004638572,0.0029762946,0.00498757,0.004245119,0.0016784368,0.0050451197,0.009225225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059876543,0.000019732455,0.0001564078,0.0001936273,0.000004283128,0.000070771195,0.0026287232,0.00016989809,0.00007560552,0.28703916,0.6573774,0.052258354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016202894,0.000005435518,0.0002954093,0.00027705918,0.0000013182687,0.000093174946,0.0005642676,0.000076640405,0.000028742346,0.027393015,0.9712569,0.0000065016798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010113328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014167811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051338147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003343997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029200632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17174321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281888970","doi":"","title":"Robert I. Rotberg and Dennis Thompson, eds. , Truth v. Justice: The Morality of Truth Commissions . Reviewed by","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02373591005998543,"score_gpt":0.32858805074238184,"score_spread":0.3048521406823964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281888970","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009742222,0.9771199,0.00022475884,0.013316065,0.0038952837,0.0000062801823,0.000060367332,0.000012572379,0.0052673137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018889365,0.9879667,0.00020402245,0.0012082168,0.0031002508,0.000008794429,0.00006333039,0.000016612514,0.00554305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986205,0.00046839088,0.00013449059,0.0001679698,0.00053203374,0.00007660493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942538,0.0034016706,0.00046962418,0.00009832007,0.0015139933,0.00026258276],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026520316,0.0020849046,0.001780471,0.00486107,0.0015190287,0.0046269917,0.002020673,0.0035153914,0.019695228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008270416,0.0013311666,0.0006168125,0.006031241,0.0031739424,0.008852621,0.0014309135,0.004713944,0.011656389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047977766,0.000018434945,0.0002298104,0.0020399126,0.000032517757,0.0000739184,0.00063957635,0.00021756411,0.000060346156,0.017489182,0.878633,0.100517705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002328945,0.000015323842,0.0017304223,0.0058290446,0.00004837035,0.00032384615,0.0009466721,0.00016674431,0.00014259743,0.017762152,0.97297114,0.00004038377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01922932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029547118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019695228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024949827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044980533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06588709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281908045","doi":"","title":"On Vicarious Causation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Collapse","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012766266786843993,"score_gpt":0.27198073869515427,"score_spread":0.25921447190831026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281908045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07544464,0.0062075863,0.41251445,0.07763111,0.0014193624,0.00025698106,0.00034402762,0.00019493111,0.4259869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95671815,0.0020811132,0.013109594,0.0029011187,0.0005982419,0.00024173303,0.00011705989,0.00007542819,0.02415754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964653,0.0017709091,0.00013695478,0.00060143386,0.0006449484,0.00038049128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833498,0.0118938,0.0009371012,0.0019420873,0.0013973025,0.00047993488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067402953,0.00066803384,0.0009997707,0.0023909665,0.0035474724,0.0030849986,0.0020368455,0.0036089043,0.011531737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020921621,0.00057891966,0.001051684,0.0012134804,0.02383534,0.0089681465,0.005410863,0.0054543344,0.0006751402],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014605313,0.0000032730218,0.00010598945,0.000007814363,0.000004260614,0.000032314136,0.00021189431,0.00022345288,0.000008640346,0.99818414,0.0004669653,0.00074972544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019211761,0.0000019778481,0.00006320358,0.0000068355303,0.0000020335908,0.000019175144,0.00008018857,0.0004001359,0.000010208326,0.9976186,0.0017937381,0.0000019236036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003318647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025316568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011531737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003042444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020617975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038577497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282792187","doi":"10.21991/c9q08h","title":"THE POST-CRITICAL FUTURE OF LEGAL THEORY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017374971338332195,"score_gpt":0.2732937102068024,"score_spread":0.25591873886847016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282792187","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016811198,0.05340499,0.027533267,0.61454034,0.0046731653,0.000059381557,0.00017849203,0.00008183682,0.2827174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91021055,0.015433394,0.009646994,0.031694002,0.009786048,0.00022644494,0.00009489237,0.000092907925,0.022814833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99154097,0.0056076576,0.00016499546,0.00078668626,0.001374065,0.0005255778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9448231,0.045051366,0.0012000682,0.0034252424,0.0038342387,0.0016659821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022316717,0.0005493365,0.00092758075,0.0029466993,0.0062381895,0.010822353,0.0019232121,0.0072583198,0.007840751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02645768,0.0004612355,0.0006285477,0.001318928,0.06869407,0.024165025,0.0041607637,0.01199993,0.0007312193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051059315,0.000008135338,0.000020109941,0.000021604323,0.0000015021307,0.000009916974,0.000460903,0.00005351299,0.000010719308,0.9959955,0.0021565016,0.0012563968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005847524,0.0000025282127,0.000029899244,0.000039850587,8.207286e-7,0.000008533482,0.00020607257,0.00012868516,0.000019021638,0.98423517,0.015320222,0.000003178916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00279342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002560989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022316717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011428942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007946586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118023455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282843276","doi":"","title":"Legal Theory in Wonderland","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Soul; Philosophy of law; Tort; Law; Work (physics); Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Comparative law; Engineering; Liability","score_opus":0.019711055042576076,"score_gpt":0.28085142484321984,"score_spread":0.26114036980064376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282843276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019787073,0.009645002,0.0045953537,0.06446186,0.0010896035,0.000014120567,0.00012529884,0.00007595194,0.9002057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78984857,0.0046265977,0.001981223,0.012198485,0.0006116379,0.000057973,0.00010153177,0.00009713697,0.19047678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922574,0.0004486233,0.000034335477,0.0000927953,0.00008707914,0.00011145614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993267,0.0004407474,0.000055101696,0.00007529628,0.000044339005,0.000057841655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001710383,0.00017127373,0.00037612248,0.000965467,0.004642868,0.004914177,0.00058180734,0.0020258066,0.018019427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022763025,0.00019822257,0.00044061177,0.0011157166,0.010831566,0.0065965243,0.0033492264,0.0029276365,0.00097186735],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002787725,0.0000032952848,0.00005016371,0.000009029059,7.8702584e-7,0.000030480951,0.00072057097,0.00005080297,0.000010661328,0.99218994,0.005268392,0.0016630415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008370669,0.000006300845,0.00028785624,0.00009653845,0.0000040276827,0.0000802227,0.0011421432,0.0002806873,0.00006660871,0.7862397,0.211782,0.0000055324003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056269397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008967659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018019427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005531557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001847389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06028104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283418457","doi":"","title":"Introduction - Copyright, Communication & Culture: Towards a Relational Theory of Copyright Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Public domain; Dialogic; Intellectual property; Copyright Act; Fair use; Copyright law; Sociology; Possessive; Individualism; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Expression (computer science); Creativity; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.017516169804642854,"score_gpt":0.2606413660272397,"score_spread":0.24312519622259685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283418457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012556569,0.01511575,0.06815165,0.09901169,0.0024337727,0.000084729,0.00025069158,0.00022441114,0.8021707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72855574,0.02417844,0.0432513,0.016572949,0.005181539,0.00033731727,0.00033635422,0.0002658711,0.1813205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990404,0.00041566262,0.000024564906,0.00012240869,0.00031369337,0.00008320684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797994,0.0014998526,0.00010564608,0.00009840266,0.00021188632,0.00010425237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011995175,0.00037356582,0.00022423113,0.0011885444,0.0033179687,0.0057560755,0.001346554,0.0022620696,0.013785961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023323682,0.00022690183,0.00036600218,0.0020185653,0.015105459,0.008300178,0.0018857464,0.004783971,0.0014423431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025538654,0.000008015326,0.000105267114,0.000037257687,0.0000010476346,0.00004838869,0.0035320853,0.00010382464,0.00008118533,0.97867626,0.012891689,0.00451243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051262095,0.000026273226,0.0006722483,0.00032104924,0.0000049265946,0.00028250017,0.006314249,0.0008179022,0.00031863377,0.5954093,0.39581075,0.000017068913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047101583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005213917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013785961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028033706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023263686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046118617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286344004","doi":"","title":"Martha Nussbaum , Hiding from Humanity: Shame Disgust and the Law . Reviewed by","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Disgust; Shame; Humanity; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Social psychology; Theology; Anger","score_opus":0.01570921912766118,"score_gpt":0.2702873934324198,"score_spread":0.25457817430475865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286344004","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027202113,0.8939606,0.0001921265,0.089967474,0.010643069,0.000005399174,0.00007281222,0.000011290188,0.004875139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0118374,0.93768626,0.0002824196,0.023683956,0.014931302,0.000023044955,0.00006988409,0.000029955214,0.011455796],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896777,0.00043798328,0.000097334676,0.00014649674,0.00028748502,0.00006297646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99430037,0.00369877,0.00031995855,0.000092574104,0.0013193755,0.00026902693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00156292,0.0015011716,0.0013976131,0.0030339123,0.0022222002,0.002901968,0.0019024241,0.007932063,0.019450035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073955543,0.00081591547,0.00044965392,0.002807876,0.004397448,0.0060964003,0.0014238112,0.006560202,0.0055218735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004584265,0.000026830823,0.00027373678,0.0013971657,0.00004168062,0.00020521636,0.0012664561,0.000120043456,0.00010884956,0.021068249,0.9191755,0.056270417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037128928,0.000030052155,0.0043370295,0.0044354205,0.000045063833,0.0007752456,0.0023463597,0.00015344171,0.00016767805,0.020684227,0.9669257,0.00006269705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015977524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03128507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019450035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022801103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020490473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065066874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288636941","doi":"","title":"The Edmonton Citizens\" Jury on Internet Voting","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Verdict; Voting; Deliberation; Political science; The Internet; Participatory budgeting; Citizen journalism; Public participation; Hung jury; Public relations; Law; Business; Computer science; Democracy; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.020055790597204564,"score_gpt":0.2723520516662947,"score_spread":0.25229626106909014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288636941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13281702,0.053718753,0.001982251,0.27752233,0.013953929,0.00088755414,0.0009443263,0.00012099358,0.5180528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63819146,0.022402795,0.0038904112,0.09083477,0.0029654237,0.00071856944,0.0005979385,0.00008555032,0.24031308],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97688556,0.008196172,0.0009842294,0.0016403644,0.00898265,0.0033110369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811017,0.010962016,0.0006410723,0.0006498085,0.0053895065,0.001255932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028042726,0.0003527623,0.0006978974,0.0021592376,0.023226548,0.006836463,0.0025325755,0.008187287,0.0050240047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045354936,0.0005612827,0.0005707537,0.0021012702,0.0066959555,0.0017954585,0.0041170083,0.007085155,0.000832202],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023738435,0.00006329202,0.0027202654,0.00065989984,0.00006452508,0.001421658,0.016317286,0.00042378536,0.00090778474,0.19019006,0.6943571,0.092637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007119662,0.000066524255,0.008896722,0.0015469484,0.0000751999,0.00012044033,0.010535307,0.00018369844,0.0010008722,0.008567182,0.9688311,0.00010466693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6228697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82182497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37713033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02937952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06212861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75870264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289808459","doi":"","title":"One Good Thing: Law, Elevator Etiquette and Litigating Aboriginal Rights in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Etiquette; Elevator; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0042211935944162235,"score_gpt":0.24826440083959397,"score_spread":0.24404320724517775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289808459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2600601,0.027174814,0.0017210364,0.25655052,0.0018934561,0.00012027352,0.00038694323,0.00007015633,0.45202267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8828994,0.0094328495,0.00068827736,0.024561342,0.00028948128,0.00003586864,0.00006955599,0.000057734822,0.08196559],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932134,0.00069929013,0.00013203605,0.00041824192,0.0023702579,0.0031668243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99240947,0.0029819235,0.00047439887,0.00014893907,0.0025702293,0.0014149379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003912353,0.00033480933,0.0005846694,0.0021595336,0.06032177,0.01532239,0.0031826696,0.008857292,0.0068468414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01646009,0.00042777296,0.00046819684,0.003987861,0.023832556,0.0038256156,0.004798798,0.009039967,0.00041762597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007390173,0.00007297335,0.013211209,0.00023915613,0.000039058705,0.0016981172,0.2404306,0.00077957066,0.00043447342,0.6124427,0.104975566,0.025602663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053217478,0.000038857506,0.03291922,0.0009467225,0.00012502918,0.00043440456,0.40879473,0.0009062713,0.00076019287,0.03775998,0.51705796,0.00020345398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99703515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99884534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13723923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13723923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30963778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290328147","doi":"10.5817/cejcs2008-6-10","title":"Aboriginal oral history evidence and Canadian law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Central European journal of Canadian studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oral history; Law; History; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.08995779631503995,"score_gpt":0.29247385398782805,"score_spread":0.2025160576727881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290328147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07468992,0.03072347,0.0011205169,0.058665786,0.00051489787,0.000086552915,0.0007981172,0.00007458375,0.8333261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8835129,0.023693841,0.0019206011,0.0069891484,0.0002033317,0.000039579587,0.00040481245,0.000059713424,0.08317592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933569,0.00082654814,0.00021200663,0.0004926435,0.003418085,0.0016938507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801782,0.0056315428,0.0011919338,0.00067219586,0.010437727,0.0018884122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049750623,0.00036080513,0.00045734295,0.010037442,0.022773307,0.015830867,0.0030070064,0.0024774133,0.01926086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02432873,0.0004932482,0.0002738065,0.010016204,0.02344252,0.003320985,0.0061400123,0.0036494667,0.0007430798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037389324,0.000032145228,0.008196385,0.00057992147,0.000028821558,0.0012151151,0.075059146,0.00040693957,0.00031032125,0.758441,0.07163385,0.08405897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011261446,0.000016594113,0.024134364,0.0021531694,0.00006367316,0.00030329422,0.061831214,0.0004440567,0.00054318184,0.053243905,0.8571553,0.00009999125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9896403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99526656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12994222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12994222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19504079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94280124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290710692","doi":"","title":"The Possibility of Pleasure: Foucaulfs Philosophy of the Subject and the Logic of an Appeal to Aesthetics","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternate routes","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Pleasure; Subject (documents); Aesthetics; Philosophy; Art; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science; Political science; Psychotherapist; Law","score_opus":0.02303514314426664,"score_gpt":0.2864820557049066,"score_spread":0.26344691256063996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290710692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03347634,0.0151053,0.07388533,0.1253475,0.0023225215,0.000061288236,0.00009455914,0.000105823776,0.7496013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94135314,0.0017934417,0.009940442,0.005701476,0.0016425184,0.0001261196,0.000022487142,0.00013579005,0.039284512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99557,0.003021308,0.00009427087,0.0004221263,0.00058014743,0.00031226667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545395,0.0031802296,0.00018919869,0.0005248537,0.0003915655,0.0002601517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072104195,0.0006663075,0.0008126763,0.002054819,0.0076914607,0.010689063,0.0018275175,0.0075646015,0.0046545025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010143387,0.00051954377,0.0010638183,0.0011280457,0.0825972,0.013868317,0.004858803,0.009121137,0.00060998625],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002637463,0.000001902322,0.00000974375,0.0000032493397,6.110827e-7,0.0000067131755,0.00050924125,0.000025129088,0.0000074769564,0.9987368,0.00040630507,0.00029021534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042613033,0.0000022453478,0.0000115197045,0.000008942111,7.7218067e-7,0.000009318306,0.00017982356,0.00009847224,0.00001303229,0.99511284,0.004556436,0.000002271356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005278349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004666828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010689063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068567996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035609098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04974979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2290919682","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900006202","title":"Equality, Assurance and Criminalization","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Argument (complex analysis); Supreme court; Wrongdoing; Equal Protection Clause; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Harm; Jurisprudence; Criminal law; Duty; Due Process Clause; Criminal code; Sociology","score_opus":0.02882209826293836,"score_gpt":0.3114581393830779,"score_spread":0.28263604112013957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2290919682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11775485,0.0072814105,0.019182196,0.0486305,0.00033662797,0.00008126216,0.0000687433,0.000054367356,0.8066101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842668,0.00072948914,0.0010695771,0.0018884856,0.00012993286,0.000035679677,0.000013368986,0.000012531244,0.0118541205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908223,0.0032741956,0.000365962,0.0014391945,0.0019897807,0.0021085683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950193,0.001875874,0.00083789014,0.00085856294,0.00086770725,0.0005406728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006351907,0.0003408078,0.0005494129,0.0012495803,0.008032629,0.0066043683,0.0009350935,0.0033572593,0.003891034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012247764,0.00026446697,0.0004266605,0.0008529823,0.062932804,0.006289747,0.007886084,0.004783013,0.0003677841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002591516,0.000003697135,0.00020221762,0.000005041596,0.0000012407188,0.000012948797,0.0009636394,0.000052943393,0.000017654083,0.99663204,0.00037606322,0.0017298957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010420341,0.000017869424,0.0012486482,0.000065875975,0.000006943178,0.000058112957,0.00096963753,0.00026325352,0.00017552661,0.97030747,0.02686592,0.000010353319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03142588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016293785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9685741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008339196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070668263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062485933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291797381","doi":"","title":"Homeless Nation: Producing Legal Subjectivities Through New Media","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Media studies; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.03548954620281619,"score_gpt":0.28940516772766145,"score_spread":0.25391562152484526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291797381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5317801,0.0009982398,0.0065862937,0.0166154,0.00039644368,0.00009379588,0.00011994595,0.00025265693,0.44315705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685573,0.0003685153,0.0027294082,0.0011005122,0.00012514771,0.000051486404,0.000053909964,0.00008811095,0.026925683],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997652,0.0016484491,0.00006081552,0.0001546315,0.0003017009,0.00018240804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98528486,0.009720586,0.0012625476,0.0014048348,0.0008795098,0.0014476608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004468607,0.0002268774,0.0001743381,0.0022215839,0.0054582753,0.013149055,0.0010248173,0.001326206,0.018013729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013208327,0.00022888063,0.00021520123,0.0012005727,0.008311855,0.007924135,0.0081959795,0.0018694513,0.0014548086],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016826997,0.0008198145,0.033743814,0.00033561,0.000034277462,0.002166303,0.3721203,0.00026961364,0.0040193987,0.33521542,0.036022503,0.21508472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082892715,0.000353919,0.020961782,0.00076777925,0.00007912893,0.00082486996,0.41241053,0.0021853417,0.0055365255,0.12025053,0.43646798,0.00007870588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024605924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005413728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018013729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016700466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022748574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060261905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292833892","doi":"","title":"Méthodologies ambidextres en droit (Ambidextrous Legal Methodologies)","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Metaphor; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03997095643237953,"score_gpt":0.3285964952151123,"score_spread":0.2886255387827328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292833892","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008196591,0.003973343,0.8787599,0.0099454615,0.0005311409,0.0006880974,0.00020067953,0.0003981633,0.09730654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21549492,0.0053336686,0.74839425,0.0023132467,0.00038721086,0.0027983987,0.0003189841,0.00044589612,0.024513556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9529017,0.036467295,0.0020139432,0.003037465,0.0047616214,0.000817989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9687704,0.019119775,0.0016199797,0.0063206013,0.0032740196,0.0008952268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03503137,0.0011596008,0.0007392967,0.0064959214,0.0040145083,0.016945364,0.0028220788,0.0033396913,0.009189673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029539458,0.00094093085,0.0015611597,0.004685097,0.022458257,0.01759809,0.010875078,0.0044175833,0.0024614271],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008708155,0.000034448254,0.00034335285,0.00030689023,0.000016351354,0.00007479348,0.014451938,0.0004009459,0.00037754423,0.94960624,0.0015710561,0.032807715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024804072,0.000048937156,0.00041021963,0.0010528206,0.00002367803,0.00029930548,0.0106269475,0.0023787133,0.0011161737,0.73489034,0.24909557,0.00003240891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002225492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025653264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03503137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057222242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009147381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18526578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293311790","doi":"10.21991/c9x371","title":"SHARPE’S PERVERSE AESTHETIC","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Political Science Association; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Supreme court; Charter; Law; Pornography; Section (typography); Criminal code; Child pornography; Psychology; Political science; Criminal law; Sociology; The Internet; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.042270064181060656,"score_gpt":0.27242083274394674,"score_spread":0.23015076856288608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293311790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025971013,0.0036500203,0.0045984397,0.018239828,0.0010386553,0.000015930695,0.000043294454,0.000068144225,0.96974856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42283052,0.0036053492,0.005163383,0.015268704,0.0016617465,0.00008961231,0.00007348644,0.00029937932,0.5510078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803895,0.00085831765,0.000043745025,0.00030125427,0.0005111928,0.0002464219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929404,0.0002633788,0.000040666066,0.0001716937,0.00014722257,0.0000829867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001770196,0.0005232221,0.00021790377,0.0010971099,0.006184494,0.0057803453,0.0007035989,0.002772542,0.016498601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003720215,0.00022892714,0.0003682123,0.0007225289,0.01754563,0.0040535755,0.0032986465,0.0050503737,0.0037417358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032839487,0.000002499097,0.000025908388,0.00000915924,0.0000010236026,0.000038794966,0.0015685897,0.00003074307,0.00004652675,0.9657317,0.02898466,0.0035571333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038447347,0.0000075486173,0.00008920333,0.00004733615,0.0000019140869,0.00019506627,0.0009295789,0.00011350425,0.00010977355,0.23608214,0.76241255,0.0000076224333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005152486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009584366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016498601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031018266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016533729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055193305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293319385","doi":"","title":"Interview by Lawrence Liang for the Alternative Law Forum","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012557519858342064,"score_gpt":0.28781508905965525,"score_spread":0.27525756920131317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293319385","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008759789,0.005095321,0.00093609357,0.94881636,0.006524337,0.00017940646,0.001111363,0.00017082845,0.0284065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06511205,0.0037211867,0.001424153,0.5816086,0.00224794,0.0008403845,0.00044559056,0.00024759446,0.34435257],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984848,0.00064987317,0.000045144072,0.0001483213,0.00029205318,0.0003798669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958733,0.002208475,0.00016154782,0.00007715248,0.0008624709,0.00081705715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039712097,0.0007095791,0.00078366126,0.0012848226,0.010127649,0.002817102,0.0011028837,0.00940802,0.045465406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011020372,0.00070915057,0.00044918866,0.0019401468,0.0022975826,0.0044979528,0.0020783264,0.011223766,0.01207529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043468986,0.00002741884,0.00081420795,0.000039255603,0.0000020155906,0.0002995138,0.0065849572,0.00005818513,0.0002704548,0.0024064179,0.98383003,0.005624087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012954796,0.000020286801,0.0012043554,0.00006790508,0.0000025863474,0.00015461883,0.020929547,0.000097392054,0.00009710114,0.0008109224,0.9765678,0.00003454355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1018283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19756843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1018283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007287632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072934986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2024712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293348139","doi":"","title":"Drawing Boundaries: Election Law and Its Democratic Consequences","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Election law; Democracy; Political science; Boundary (topology); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political economy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03408673442205066,"score_gpt":0.28308536448583277,"score_spread":0.24899863006378212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293348139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06947911,0.007218928,0.15565863,0.09114056,0.0013041177,0.00013951136,0.00008859208,0.00018958023,0.67478096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97354263,0.0010945577,0.012526513,0.002812518,0.0003688906,0.00015361949,0.000027955117,0.000077532786,0.009395692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97791094,0.013389376,0.0007078505,0.0021705718,0.0037880149,0.002033234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874263,0.0075890683,0.0011704484,0.0019427568,0.0012358928,0.00063563336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02207448,0.0003540598,0.00079591415,0.0016572799,0.015688349,0.012571695,0.0018173808,0.005482209,0.0048887962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04368204,0.00059270207,0.0006525093,0.0020758733,0.05649232,0.012951842,0.010869935,0.00944859,0.0007085179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037586326,0.0000040372415,0.00008343891,0.0000064045303,0.000001296497,0.0000106362895,0.0013470969,0.00016191229,0.00002185099,0.9952703,0.0005407282,0.0025484406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008915862,0.000005120403,0.0001271403,0.000026573434,0.0000021612695,0.000015051107,0.0007439365,0.00023892497,0.00007953998,0.98705196,0.011694297,0.0000062776944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068220776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005539203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02207448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005241026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063257287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11674237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293438839","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1111","title":"Book Review: Legal Institutions And Collective Memories, by Susanne Karstedt (ed)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law and economics; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.011676602496287674,"score_gpt":0.286992000890769,"score_spread":0.2753153983944813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293438839","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007758264,0.941668,0.00012559551,0.02347473,0.023615919,0.000016334747,0.00016380087,0.000027722286,0.010830223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015528318,0.8577692,0.00034329432,0.018832613,0.028976908,0.00008339638,0.00041216952,0.00005042035,0.09197913],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992798,0.00013946305,0.000058134796,0.00008460475,0.00038004937,0.00005801423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706227,0.0014201014,0.00016298235,0.00007112177,0.0010671864,0.00021628752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011009768,0.0014227931,0.0020104062,0.0046307794,0.0012228277,0.004105076,0.001677268,0.003914342,0.026901899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053566736,0.00072455406,0.0006206577,0.007478142,0.0013781218,0.004300019,0.0013275569,0.0031889356,0.018083237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057223847,0.0000055435808,0.000029323191,0.00031968183,0.000004446926,0.000011827478,0.000020845795,0.000022473676,0.000016934891,0.00041473578,0.97196215,0.027186265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008042943,0.000007992348,0.00031415533,0.0009889593,0.000014230452,0.00010983397,0.00007144423,0.000022614244,0.00002469136,0.0008205762,0.99761045,0.0000068859267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020157997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073099725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026901899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002952554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005697935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0899958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W229365536","doi":"","title":"An Addendum on Bedford: Sex and the Supreme Court- Obscenity and Indecency Law in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Addendum; Law; Political science; First amendment","score_opus":0.007133073079613201,"score_gpt":0.23327474753122243,"score_spread":0.22614167445160924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W229365536","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037114132,0.10171275,0.0006797954,0.574049,0.027009873,0.00012678487,0.002498631,0.000058158268,0.25675094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2503562,0.096955694,0.00095441134,0.115648285,0.010118055,0.00012246746,0.00073743984,0.00022861842,0.5248788],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981773,0.00024140377,0.000050581242,0.0001188796,0.000559921,0.0008518797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955961,0.0017340698,0.000109875946,0.000086682114,0.0017245844,0.0007486907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013457149,0.000605271,0.0010458591,0.0023330573,0.028634202,0.009638699,0.0027310916,0.007050096,0.030369068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046466296,0.00050038856,0.00070841017,0.005726903,0.0067057493,0.0047565904,0.003467412,0.00677703,0.0014621238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003223549,0.000044545894,0.0019873085,0.00020002066,0.000014048262,0.0003847246,0.010410027,0.00023356212,0.00012951257,0.07886736,0.89050907,0.017187525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018774754,0.000017336573,0.010310135,0.0005422169,0.0000418353,0.00012664519,0.03941487,0.00021004831,0.0001841916,0.012754169,0.9362577,0.0001221613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9873864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065451704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065451704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.094929606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47488755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294494578","doi":"","title":"Three Peters and an Obsessions with Pierre in a Piece of Work: Intellectual Property in John Greyson's Un©Ut","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Queer; Criticism; Politics; Sociology; State (computer science); Identity (music); Semiotics; Property (philosophy); Enforcement; Law; Political science; Aesthetics; Art; Gender studies; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01442185986134382,"score_gpt":0.2565874003662846,"score_spread":0.24216554050494077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294494578","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13314295,0.008987732,0.0022097055,0.47124413,0.003169261,0.00005471304,0.000057368747,0.00010855893,0.3810256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80407554,0.0024847004,0.000920808,0.058031376,0.0010350831,0.00004785938,0.000019606228,0.0002714953,0.1331136],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965,0.00184052,0.000047219874,0.00042674103,0.0005838413,0.00060151273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962296,0.0026793291,0.00016777041,0.00014760376,0.00028914574,0.00048644273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026540705,0.00057355757,0.00032772237,0.0008099388,0.03253238,0.010446116,0.0010868447,0.008601122,0.0053247423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011102348,0.00054769067,0.00032509599,0.00071214564,0.036084823,0.007918155,0.004581615,0.01551647,0.00076158013],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037785037,0.000025866182,0.0006048287,0.000050793904,0.00000698645,0.0028441392,0.6560151,0.00007997521,0.00035158938,0.22486714,0.106465034,0.008650765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008131364,0.000021166154,0.00083674054,0.00022060557,0.0000053049325,0.0010374364,0.28891248,0.000112776004,0.00044084757,0.02200173,0.6863579,0.00004487892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.075261846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112827145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075261846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073544546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034872964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14964753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294897921","doi":"","title":"Kontextsensitive Bildauswahl? Studien zur Bild-Präferenz","year":2013,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Ingénierie des systèmes d information","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities","score_opus":0.017522690339436087,"score_gpt":0.25125055625518844,"score_spread":0.23372786591575234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294897921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62517333,0.09281222,0.012163874,0.025499335,0.00044882204,0.00046654174,0.00028120307,0.00005453778,0.24310018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762496,0.014879575,0.0017067685,0.0016481862,0.00009057653,0.000321235,0.00006941128,0.000025673973,0.005009012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98161834,0.012404812,0.0010399023,0.001677166,0.002335803,0.0009239649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9353453,0.052115906,0.0052162022,0.0035887652,0.0025947974,0.0011390713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017023927,0.0004256601,0.000828715,0.0027029843,0.0038853514,0.014294634,0.0012605974,0.0026917588,0.016172973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050959148,0.0005053275,0.0005791031,0.0037387435,0.01081124,0.01601515,0.005659304,0.0028776352,0.0015111961],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082672504,0.0014023865,0.033745248,0.0052811927,0.00041505578,0.00050453853,0.30222762,0.00043322847,0.0015966735,0.33775434,0.005612639,0.31020033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004074725,0.00091975124,0.084582284,0.01123611,0.0006827187,0.0010564649,0.4464739,0.0007143332,0.004719552,0.22798446,0.22106811,0.0001548402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033084957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003929649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017023927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048548593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037739896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09003216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296136612","doi":"10.1177/154230500305700406","title":"“Worlds Apart”: Truth Telling in the Case of Mrs. VV","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling Advancing theory and professional practice through scholarly and reflective publications","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St Mary's Hospital Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Truth telling; Art; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.0271268268973858,"score_gpt":0.39591680519942646,"score_spread":0.36878997830204063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296136612","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44097388,0.004815566,0.004589249,0.48844737,0.0028565845,0.00011205349,0.000083152045,0.00007135443,0.0580508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94712824,0.0026279585,0.002516211,0.036658008,0.00078061875,0.00006326875,0.000032385353,0.000057713038,0.010135487],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99401325,0.003571819,0.00019392352,0.00029705194,0.00049015373,0.0014337786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99308676,0.0039050605,0.0008539931,0.000165458,0.00036118386,0.0016274942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003825034,0.0005761777,0.00065923156,0.0009866308,0.024998315,0.0045980103,0.0017950604,0.0127206175,0.0034385498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024364404,0.0006108426,0.0011089657,0.00078353175,0.0104136495,0.005068903,0.0043666237,0.020352527,0.0005269372],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016556095,0.0001537465,0.006666265,0.00026150644,0.000039295777,0.4433626,0.42142364,0.00067943364,0.0010664035,0.06684208,0.03873333,0.020606184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021165799,0.0001692611,0.0023564184,0.0005949298,0.000037195237,0.30054644,0.5544412,0.0011586802,0.0011980907,0.019594084,0.119763054,0.000119436605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073508834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015393957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024998315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004440318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045095505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032216966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296197268","doi":"","title":"Droit, cinéma et doute : Rapport minoritaire","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Movie theater; Art; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology; Art history","score_opus":0.02151012931332261,"score_gpt":0.2895974222897611,"score_spread":0.26808729297643846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296197268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031286526,0.11142672,0.0020409531,0.0991769,0.009778625,0.00006441991,0.0002585143,0.0001256712,0.7458417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53911006,0.07146513,0.0014684509,0.015111414,0.005495695,0.00012489303,0.00023876123,0.00032400657,0.36666155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983,0.0008664835,0.00003232479,0.00019665818,0.00028896047,0.000315574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984137,0.0006502922,0.00010240542,0.00010113507,0.00033743473,0.00039509905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013467086,0.0007930748,0.00042257557,0.0017682061,0.012860164,0.011051644,0.00094154384,0.0026510793,0.021792056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026597918,0.0003477676,0.00021810227,0.001890171,0.010660066,0.0056707575,0.004920575,0.006182815,0.0020851009],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050706643,0.000049760853,0.0013836315,0.00051635713,0.000013281202,0.001383605,0.27689976,0.0000495342,0.0009840972,0.40581343,0.22569354,0.087162346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015578365,0.000009226395,0.0009931833,0.00032859945,0.000004866719,0.0005188284,0.028548263,0.000025293335,0.00010328743,0.0016619959,0.9677969,0.0000079342635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26001906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44044676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26001906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016338257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009737649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51701117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297543524","doi":"","title":"Weaving a Tangled Web: Hape and the Obfuscation of Canadian Reception Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Obfuscation; Weaving; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Computer security; Computer science; Engineering; Sociology","score_opus":0.007261938284462955,"score_gpt":0.24701947946653116,"score_spread":0.2397575411820682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297543524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10227624,0.002998655,0.0137229515,0.061423726,0.00064289116,0.00006530221,0.0005746389,0.0006949763,0.81760067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8639331,0.0012378744,0.003710922,0.004200747,0.00014390268,0.000025800795,0.00013502956,0.0003046925,0.12630802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964155,0.0006664175,0.000055883705,0.00029727077,0.0014324446,0.001132593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900483,0.00386586,0.00029338605,0.0023701068,0.0027264676,0.0006958399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036298626,0.00028933847,0.00027752726,0.0030219133,0.015625464,0.013127764,0.0016232205,0.003432268,0.02411621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021440603,0.00043592384,0.00029801074,0.0039462894,0.01788286,0.008575523,0.0049052965,0.0039975015,0.0014227716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054038264,0.000018243212,0.0033637674,0.000050814768,0.000010667354,0.00046139743,0.038434647,0.00058705686,0.0002955658,0.808226,0.07600112,0.07249678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018473287,0.000016139478,0.0066765496,0.00037229873,0.0000362521,0.00030652696,0.02596086,0.0027532447,0.0010296063,0.14354266,0.8191898,0.000097577016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8922392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9099917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10776079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032414198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03627933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23518258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297690363","doi":"","title":"The Visual Force of Justice in the Making of Liberia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Object (grammar); Objectivity (philosophy); Aesthetics; Sociology; Political science; History; Epistemology; Art; Artificial intelligence; Anthropology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023060229806784283,"score_gpt":0.34874900107255685,"score_spread":0.32568877126577256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297690363","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12718654,0.00951209,0.0050976933,0.038178205,0.0006938176,0.000031785727,0.00004538719,0.00006674088,0.8191877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97528833,0.00140922,0.000748627,0.001329745,0.00015647536,0.000017313807,0.000008446016,0.000041342086,0.021000393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981718,0.0011157754,0.000026689473,0.00013877946,0.00023013746,0.0003168905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916685,0.00050581363,0.00009066552,0.00008618137,0.000058164154,0.00009235926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013735299,0.0003253099,0.00024356309,0.0010088144,0.009214009,0.011828917,0.0006224787,0.0016046368,0.005124677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031028325,0.00021876708,0.0002058464,0.00083753874,0.049236618,0.00749962,0.005252113,0.003985725,0.00035510125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019495707,0.000008392726,0.0003541545,0.000047402973,0.0000036590357,0.00014430415,0.1470144,0.000055431,0.0002433481,0.837861,0.0039121015,0.010336328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017254799,0.000047638347,0.0028053161,0.0004883489,0.000017285169,0.00054117065,0.1939778,0.00027214547,0.0010295188,0.3049247,0.49583787,0.00004088862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00800766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013178752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011828917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058342577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002162994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042330682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299369703","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2002.10756562","title":"Indigenous Rights and Customary Law Discourse","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal pluralism; Indigenous rights; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Legitimacy; Precedent; Customary international law; Indigenous; International law; Comparative law; Sociology; Human rights; Public international law; Legal realism; Politics","score_opus":0.012707198636407619,"score_gpt":0.26371512133125585,"score_spread":0.25100792269484823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299369703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26828966,0.014132355,0.002194599,0.03887485,0.00067805493,0.000050230123,0.0001877644,0.00006965673,0.67552274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96998906,0.0019832568,0.0005961257,0.0021196045,0.000074032665,0.000013738645,0.000038823633,0.000033754142,0.025151646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99379575,0.0012012176,0.00018723517,0.0009103075,0.0018410442,0.0020645084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99483347,0.0021594658,0.00040536138,0.0003529608,0.0012187267,0.001029949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00608533,0.00047585656,0.00050862366,0.002677925,0.029680712,0.013394973,0.0029552488,0.003673125,0.006155684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061175833,0.00035141868,0.00034932917,0.0034545232,0.07713075,0.005993872,0.007883905,0.004545287,0.00029002837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000119406,0.00001565508,0.0012820428,0.000076426506,0.000006822209,0.0005164182,0.2874994,0.00022893025,0.0002827475,0.69438845,0.0055927685,0.010098483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019539828,0.00002237532,0.008431269,0.0009761248,0.00002866649,0.0003228747,0.34403268,0.0004785236,0.0005254601,0.07514693,0.56988716,0.00012844121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9680742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9753307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9680742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12909117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1084591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93662643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299521712","doi":"","title":"Uncovering Michael Moore in Manufacturing Dissent","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Screen education","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Viewpoints; Project commissioning; Variety (cybernetics); Sociology; Publishing; Politics; Political dissent; Media studies; Management; Law; Visual arts; Political science; Computer science; Art; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01276894827184816,"score_gpt":0.3178767546665867,"score_spread":0.30510780639473856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299521712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22810592,0.004377556,0.007491191,0.33280426,0.003170805,0.000084224754,0.00016862284,0.00020423825,0.42359313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8932363,0.0014798135,0.0033338284,0.028931355,0.0005172208,0.00007954735,0.00004088129,0.00012441348,0.072256714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478036,0.0020431245,0.00012643645,0.0005685061,0.001612963,0.0008685436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887087,0.00671467,0.0011173941,0.0006238906,0.0016071687,0.0012282201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038250068,0.00039484503,0.00028322617,0.0027685382,0.023681497,0.0070835515,0.0009759774,0.0027545805,0.007695589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022194203,0.00028100767,0.00017242681,0.002594781,0.015789548,0.0046541644,0.0041755447,0.0047716657,0.0010296504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055273045,0.00005019099,0.007069831,0.0000779837,0.000013557106,0.0013661885,0.2727885,0.00013565688,0.0006816662,0.39082378,0.2707155,0.05622191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010703182,0.00002176393,0.0057279794,0.00027595842,0.0000090888025,0.0005512401,0.23001966,0.00037550283,0.0011452376,0.050188195,0.7116153,0.000059313137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049443208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.119826086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049443208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010596818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00681641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09831083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302519861","doi":"10.5206/tjr.2016.1.4.2","title":"The Perfect Data-Marriage","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transitional justice review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Erasmus+; University of Twente; University of British Columbia; Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam","keywords":"Economic Justice; Perspective (graphical); Narrative; Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Dimension (graph theory); Sociology; Transitional justice; Relation (database); Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Geography; Computer science; Linguistics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.0668751935789766,"score_gpt":0.3736069460613553,"score_spread":0.3067317524823787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302519861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014466956,0.005729236,0.27115008,0.13616107,0.02575964,0.0039680754,0.18742299,0.014387784,0.34095418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21041924,0.0060818177,0.4012272,0.06271332,0.0055142674,0.017231379,0.12717661,0.021942535,0.14769363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93355936,0.03274025,0.0070838323,0.010830054,0.013845339,0.0019411294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79800975,0.063578464,0.0068966644,0.100552335,0.026598005,0.0043648244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055118397,0.0008742282,0.0019306294,0.005318359,0.004223943,0.013644753,0.0041623884,0.0047844024,0.17675342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30048975,0.0017626766,0.0019062681,0.008935341,0.0067762113,0.015823493,0.017460775,0.007498981,0.088029206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082289986,0.00012978692,0.008588224,0.001881659,0.00022343728,0.00041961568,0.006513366,0.00048329355,0.0009216899,0.23297933,0.5129119,0.2341248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007081174,0.000042878113,0.0014393702,0.0013422299,0.00003467306,0.00020739734,0.0013959891,0.0003081218,0.00045671887,0.06783245,0.926824,0.00004542838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004174236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041519552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17675342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022808793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013138256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59129906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2306258811","doi":"10.1017/9781316681060.005","title":"Law, Culture, and Fact in Indigenous Claims","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Content (measure theory); Indigenous culture; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Mathematics; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.02457100573533469,"score_gpt":0.23850068328642346,"score_spread":0.21392967755108877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2306258811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022968808,0.0115325805,0.0013295843,0.013672505,0.00025063165,0.000013959952,0.000024813502,0.000016437962,0.9501908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8143802,0.007729306,0.00081624504,0.0019434335,0.00042689673,0.000043639746,0.000025426236,0.00003357108,0.17460129],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883646,0.00048064726,0.000038567738,0.00009498578,0.00037360858,0.00017573475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984016,0.0011691446,0.000084285435,0.00014080817,0.00013153146,0.00007265069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022951586,0.0002313434,0.00027949992,0.0009415066,0.0061088717,0.006733464,0.0008382082,0.0028819346,0.009484961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051350193,0.00021430236,0.00023207154,0.0015489904,0.020143587,0.0064964076,0.0025377811,0.0033823461,0.0006679874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025778118,0.0000057615957,0.000088331,0.000029206718,0.0000013794098,0.000074739604,0.010439632,0.000060547107,0.00003429539,0.9797448,0.0038610378,0.0056576924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049641226,0.000010706299,0.0013472565,0.0006100894,0.000010240681,0.00017534333,0.016057689,0.0004592806,0.00021645075,0.80908674,0.1720059,0.000015288211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020403454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028534852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020403454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006423822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036365949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04660827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2307226653","doi":"10.11575/prism/34002","title":"Whatever Happened To … The Prosecution of Susan Nelles","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Criminology; Political science; History; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.02016009859108761,"score_gpt":0.21479883784471607,"score_spread":0.19463873925362846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2307226653","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047659803,0.009459186,0.000614211,0.85825115,0.009575646,0.000029431227,0.000028931006,0.00007577579,0.0743058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44863397,0.0076756934,0.00084817223,0.41537747,0.0028788848,0.00006001255,0.000036226196,0.00012922521,0.12436025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960162,0.0013841817,0.00015672385,0.000494938,0.0010050486,0.0009428103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957858,0.0012199986,0.0005619092,0.0001431076,0.0010503783,0.0012386661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024054663,0.0005093538,0.00043951455,0.00055913214,0.021087134,0.004816431,0.001119719,0.008091059,0.004559132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018287763,0.00054425996,0.00038748852,0.0003270217,0.0127560105,0.003932169,0.0042426083,0.015701475,0.0015982761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095586336,0.000047481946,0.0045560505,0.00017538248,0.000030515062,0.01074227,0.17229433,0.00018193499,0.0013293225,0.04017343,0.74609894,0.024274847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006601439,0.000064424356,0.0014476208,0.0005824095,0.00001093848,0.00575762,0.14621924,0.000079288206,0.0006420098,0.0046317987,0.8404893,0.00006869378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052924994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11532838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052924994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067308047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008328045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10523385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2307320557","doi":"","title":"Impersonations: Troubling the Person in Law and Culture by Sheryl N. Hamilton (review)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Sociology; Genealogy; Political science","score_opus":0.008960525944106368,"score_gpt":0.22465626116058052,"score_spread":0.21569573521647414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2307320557","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000051573108,0.95757854,0.000019873385,0.040175647,0.0016190844,0.000002763408,0.000006379854,0.000001776433,0.0005444549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016890899,0.9746832,0.000043010343,0.020207852,0.0024016243,0.0000122706015,0.000011224755,0.0000035217238,0.0009481964],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748516,0.0013135949,0.00016227245,0.00014024356,0.00072838255,0.00017022346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898717,0.006508377,0.0008646094,0.00015340526,0.0017879417,0.0008139421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046291184,0.0008547389,0.0014313523,0.0024724398,0.0020693394,0.0036765204,0.0018446854,0.005649926,0.0029323073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016486537,0.0005705596,0.0006328401,0.0036661162,0.00771948,0.0062305504,0.002881918,0.006796579,0.001047199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037315986,0.000011149364,0.00027716358,0.005290978,0.000064454536,0.000090209185,0.0010980912,0.00006701559,0.000029141705,0.0086448705,0.8748973,0.10949236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041847972,0.000030562955,0.0023100993,0.020129874,0.00010492413,0.0005656242,0.001994149,0.00003797738,0.00004527763,0.0064483737,0.96825165,0.000039609527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08179724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18502234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08179724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074065886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019154023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16264224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309307806","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316403594.008","title":"Putting up a defence: sex, murder and videotapes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Law; Legal profession; The arts; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.020867344818171617,"score_gpt":0.22612129390877933,"score_spread":0.2052539490906077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2309307806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041044205,0.061869506,0.0034286606,0.018097727,0.0022902545,0.00007307353,0.00015583802,0.000092396855,0.8729484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41234934,0.04229475,0.0032867955,0.0053847204,0.0015973285,0.00013550774,0.00020920673,0.00015947736,0.5345829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993253,0.0003766514,0.000018445662,0.000041311658,0.00018256887,0.000055750712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861526,0.0010133262,0.00008750681,0.000096105134,0.00011012268,0.00007770534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007572017,0.00045926496,0.00018803556,0.00092592236,0.002690048,0.0033676592,0.0007067325,0.0021048677,0.009172396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039392407,0.00018542896,0.000120845834,0.00062766555,0.0072686207,0.004795998,0.0021062002,0.0019758502,0.0020819907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007449155,0.00006721355,0.00091351033,0.00052271463,0.000013008189,0.0010656917,0.15684357,0.00015961734,0.001828887,0.45809975,0.16222988,0.21818161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008894787,0.000055801112,0.0019735426,0.0012430045,0.0000067183137,0.0014831194,0.045688655,0.00019792197,0.0012200522,0.03655316,0.9115476,0.0000216282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034149447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008296332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009172396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010745391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001016122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03068477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2312642502","doi":"10.1017/s0022278x15000130","title":"Drawing the Line: Toward an Aesthetics of Transitional Justice by Carrol Clarkson New York, NY: Fordham University Press, 2014. Pp. xiii, 204. $24 (pbk)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Modern African Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Line (geometry); Sociology; Economic Justice; Content (measure theory); Humanities; Art; Media studies; Aesthetics; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.09665785394742805,"score_gpt":0.30683144821586683,"score_spread":0.2101735942684388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2312642502","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020360742,0.4153354,0.012892546,0.25683764,0.006214281,0.000074755146,0.00019961987,0.00027048934,0.30613917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21536234,0.30850598,0.022744855,0.03892447,0.004967323,0.00047808856,0.00025016713,0.001364253,0.4074025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989157,0.0006377825,0.000029526589,0.00009850826,0.00021184403,0.000106640684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989988,0.00056929176,0.00006968689,0.000058104266,0.00016908943,0.0001350649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020033324,0.0010559029,0.0004812337,0.0022391928,0.006757882,0.008207566,0.0015557952,0.0030967821,0.01949689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035430135,0.0005328473,0.00036834445,0.0029852153,0.013821482,0.013103649,0.0022885413,0.0059994967,0.00372393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026772314,0.000016945627,0.00013105242,0.00019346178,0.0000053141566,0.00011697446,0.019246621,0.00014325301,0.000114371374,0.42014098,0.5106437,0.049220566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044705826,0.0000063502835,0.00025347376,0.00058741646,0.0000033370013,0.00009197256,0.012817312,0.00012349874,0.000071351016,0.14018473,0.8458411,0.0000149694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040191274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08119134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040191274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065415427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058950717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07991463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314134142","doi":"10.2307/825999","title":"The Legitimate Extent of Freedom of Expression","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of expression; Expression (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.014263215657445864,"score_gpt":0.22510592371711377,"score_spread":0.2108427080596679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314134142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03727716,0.0025734003,0.01376033,0.018117558,0.00019883049,0.000030137468,0.00015331451,0.00003492825,0.92785436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98557633,0.0004424029,0.00088104827,0.000566982,0.00015834824,0.000047707184,0.000033876273,0.00002693927,0.012266285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861057,0.0067839804,0.00065507396,0.001688151,0.0030272063,0.0017397731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783039,0.012628489,0.0010604839,0.00441913,0.0023336606,0.0012543376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009815743,0.00036536893,0.0008502946,0.0024135744,0.008127899,0.015311264,0.0014013841,0.0063639083,0.008359228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022732403,0.00070564996,0.0006040101,0.0019759086,0.06633573,0.012119987,0.0063766027,0.006306569,0.00093286217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003157103,0.000001733264,0.00005169606,0.0000033962824,0.0000010354639,0.0000062001286,0.0009755736,0.00002428889,0.00001960401,0.9982141,0.00022637047,0.00047278457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000773249,0.0000046693917,0.0005160786,0.00003723728,0.000006389805,0.000023605997,0.001092503,0.00012908137,0.0000949441,0.98545,0.012630568,0.000007089306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01766498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02212695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01766498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009962943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069938735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072286546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314381697","doi":"10.1093/english/52.202.86","title":"Melanie Williams., Empty Justice: One Hundred Years of Law, Literature and Philosophy. Existential, Feminist and Normative Perspectives in Literary Jurisprudence","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Journal of the English Association","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Existentialism; Economic Justice; Normative; Sociology; Law and literature; Publishing; Philosophy and literature; Literary criticism; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Literature; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01332590531151427,"score_gpt":0.26656417578458236,"score_spread":0.2532382704730681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314381697","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000959403,0.6705328,0.0009298027,0.26062799,0.007341375,0.00003348198,0.00013136871,0.000075574804,0.059368297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031061154,0.6080214,0.0026779103,0.050407253,0.006721331,0.00019649042,0.00023227432,0.0003030431,0.30037925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986904,0.0003673067,0.000099029676,0.00015574503,0.0005700621,0.00011740443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681324,0.0016333645,0.0002835894,0.00007876135,0.00081847596,0.00037250368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015177426,0.0010024722,0.000654599,0.0030525154,0.0046932306,0.0052592033,0.001101737,0.0037317644,0.02112952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066480846,0.0009378475,0.0003154793,0.0031029254,0.0045072627,0.014071636,0.0030480102,0.0044403495,0.0068135215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011852333,0.000011280846,0.00014389884,0.00034996695,0.0000060054963,0.00012059118,0.004188043,0.000019098208,0.000120771874,0.01589122,0.92416584,0.054971475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006613925,0.000008721942,0.0012303161,0.0016468364,0.0000075771113,0.00030625545,0.0051889764,0.00002390641,0.00011493838,0.0176389,0.9738095,0.000017539376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022047965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05990761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022047965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028777474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004032639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07068527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314450891","doi":"10.1386/public.25.50.162_1","title":"Ownership and culture","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Cultural property; Articulation (sociology); Commons; Comprehension; Politics; Property rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Law; Cultural heritage; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.029723962135241228,"score_gpt":0.27718863495530177,"score_spread":0.24746467282006054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314450891","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10773505,0.006651593,0.0031723597,0.028015833,0.00026733175,0.000020863356,0.000115895644,0.00002452071,0.8539965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97886616,0.0013679253,0.00022268084,0.0010192535,0.00010717612,0.000012977956,0.000019340841,0.0000117658265,0.018372774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975783,0.0011902418,0.00009519619,0.00027832785,0.0004927754,0.00036509626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997361,0.0010627593,0.00042634225,0.00032974972,0.0003921533,0.0004279811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022955702,0.00017636905,0.00022039002,0.0010906823,0.0037424683,0.009767134,0.00053406076,0.0010138613,0.012439509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046657533,0.00012577079,0.00014347368,0.0010577433,0.023006612,0.0057243705,0.0045374795,0.0016664776,0.00070686993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006436305,0.000009524569,0.001575998,0.000016804883,0.000005068717,0.000057400197,0.011656732,0.000087165165,0.000112324444,0.974838,0.0029633075,0.008671202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008082167,0.000038413767,0.004158106,0.00036161998,0.000014984857,0.00021178873,0.033176735,0.00039399558,0.0004222306,0.67830116,0.28288603,0.000026873224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075291507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004702968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012439509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030049626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026656725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041614354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314830507","doi":"10.2307/3504624","title":"10.2307/3504624","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Criminal law; Harm principle; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.007627991892336005,"score_gpt":0.2209541404067149,"score_spread":0.2133261485143789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314830507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028297873,0.00030138443,0.00033316787,0.00027929278,0.00034034866,0.00004762977,0.0008887985,0.00058634084,0.99694014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009445199,0.00029869002,0.0003798037,0.00035270205,0.00008623094,0.000031592168,0.001139911,0.00031654155,0.99645007],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947304,0.000043334436,0.000039574108,0.00014145837,0.00021616137,0.00008656021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981902,0.00037468504,0.00006669817,0.00032700782,0.00046089332,0.00058049517],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078602275,0.0016715394,0.0010943412,0.0021895168,0.001806142,0.004852902,0.0018935086,0.0026436902,0.98507255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019413799,0.00077861524,0.00075525267,0.0025658694,0.0017498196,0.00562363,0.004066198,0.0016755539,0.9849836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015695086,0.00014674423,0.00042616256,0.0003855845,0.0000133778985,0.00017130715,0.000084294974,0.00013451773,0.0015014446,0.0062996466,0.62880397,0.361876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023855695,0.000030652507,0.0007916125,0.0001624415,0.0000053937197,0.00016751469,0.000117262054,0.000101488426,0.00020192086,0.0011011208,0.9972824,0.000014361458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047334996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005139126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014927447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012125913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013248514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02129221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319469791","doi":"10.1177/1743872114534017","title":"New Resistance to Hate Crime Legislation and the Concept of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Criminalization; Legislation; Hate crime; Resistance (ecology); Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Criminal law; Sexual orientation; Gender studies","score_opus":0.02033744317997799,"score_gpt":0.25583286188382276,"score_spread":0.23549541870384477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319469791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1683473,0.015919099,0.021998895,0.33594272,0.0015346477,0.000066994544,0.000048335332,0.00006804411,0.45607397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773233,0.0024739506,0.0019298152,0.011134271,0.0005325756,0.000038821654,0.000010419332,0.000038301074,0.0065185395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793931,0.008905777,0.00064414274,0.002368695,0.0063703945,0.0023179422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731958,0.018581962,0.0019969926,0.0016487788,0.0036398936,0.0009365743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017785704,0.0003706107,0.0008758837,0.0039273053,0.013980706,0.014521508,0.0027147736,0.009370504,0.0028191095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027325377,0.00041306874,0.00045476892,0.0023373086,0.14554343,0.020170372,0.0063315164,0.011270111,0.00023492069],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036171389,0.0000067670244,0.00014533325,0.0000145044205,0.0000014536928,0.00004020872,0.011570811,0.00003597734,0.000038022736,0.9850684,0.0006501032,0.0024248487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018263183,0.000033440905,0.0013076516,0.00035366227,0.000011063171,0.00020813644,0.03196933,0.00054522365,0.0003695966,0.8348226,0.13031197,0.000049138216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06729037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04068846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06729037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026076134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0146788675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18919653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320356791","doi":"10.1177/1462474512437502","title":"Pat Carlen, <i>A Criminological Imagination: Essays on Justice, Punishment and Discourse</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Punishment & Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Queensland University of Technology; University of New South Wales; Durham University; University of Toronto; University of Oxford","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Criminology; Sociology; Economic Justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03927766582674549,"score_gpt":0.3352206669071761,"score_spread":0.29594300108043065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320356791","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00070399384,0.09932157,0.00038042286,0.85496736,0.013770012,0.000023855922,0.0000739014,0.000021828906,0.030737005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048791036,0.06880961,0.0011043289,0.66969097,0.024133846,0.0003385086,0.00010280326,0.00024999602,0.18677896],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959674,0.001891816,0.00015311885,0.0005026181,0.0011031235,0.00038192034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98993,0.007697143,0.0003442167,0.0001623637,0.0011899062,0.0006764013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035310325,0.0011205145,0.0007603517,0.0022855643,0.017505571,0.011277021,0.0030515825,0.024805488,0.011560078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015252875,0.0008446017,0.0005237767,0.0029650256,0.01510973,0.016919315,0.004683247,0.022293584,0.0022246568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010225577,0.000016267162,0.00009365454,0.00014720824,0.0000066922153,0.00006445948,0.005210598,0.000030184134,0.00004247375,0.05377336,0.935024,0.005580903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020771491,0.00001019557,0.00079441286,0.0011225332,0.000012418207,0.00012438731,0.015928917,0.000060235296,0.00020081652,0.040969957,0.94072187,0.0000335042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08195693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14950083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08195693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070467717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0102363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16295975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320402003","doi":"10.1177/1936724415573130","title":"Book Review: 600 Laws in Sociology and 650 Laws in Sociology, by Mark Bird","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Social Science","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Sociology of law; Law; Law and economics; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.019386660923348127,"score_gpt":0.3279850348810686,"score_spread":0.3085983739577205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320402003","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016333308,0.70335174,0.00045847578,0.12278348,0.14136155,0.000062541876,0.00038017548,0.00015327314,0.03128543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023987961,0.46619642,0.0009804696,0.10538406,0.17750674,0.00018046543,0.00083214877,0.00027615964,0.24624474],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863404,0.0002104334,0.00009708452,0.00016255636,0.0008106662,0.000085043284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957001,0.0013785351,0.0003315896,0.000115100316,0.0019197589,0.0005548878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017220309,0.0012858522,0.0018413757,0.006778603,0.0014549245,0.0053990614,0.0017268092,0.004472384,0.02696942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009361561,0.00091594097,0.0008031368,0.005844628,0.0016348836,0.0043271095,0.0019246038,0.0049552433,0.024021838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032294483,0.0000038967587,0.00001646264,0.00013882628,0.0000031237785,0.000005815885,0.000005559197,0.0000142416175,0.000014095847,0.0002686968,0.9902789,0.009247223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000107337155,0.000008216235,0.00021263472,0.00061524176,0.000010618593,0.00006830705,0.000018505227,0.00003451157,0.00001988398,0.00093078706,0.99806386,0.000006655379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011145117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033710595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02696942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004231981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046871873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09022176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322612913","doi":"10.13165/jur-13-20-3-07","title":"Ambivalences en droit de la consommation remarques sur les effets de l'écriture du droit","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudencija","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Private law; Ambivalence; Legal realism; Political science; Opposition (politics); Comparative law; Economic Justice; Commercial law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.007662559667754621,"score_gpt":0.2643429268950099,"score_spread":0.25668036722725524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322612913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2148624,0.0068982313,0.01554294,0.13383974,0.0008377987,0.000044721157,0.00005603782,0.000093697425,0.6278244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825158,0.0010964565,0.0007518768,0.004807924,0.0002260024,0.00002721767,0.000008029125,0.00005561127,0.010511005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9596047,0.023704842,0.001035336,0.0035784286,0.009548907,0.0025277352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.957961,0.031267975,0.0031129573,0.0020303128,0.004613005,0.0010147281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027522117,0.0005928512,0.0005454609,0.0014802495,0.012753806,0.017075887,0.0019619686,0.009090706,0.004903346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036480922,0.0006874458,0.0008039461,0.0016888236,0.055976395,0.014543552,0.00824011,0.01627002,0.00074200955],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024124085,0.000016062628,0.00075233454,0.00004060612,0.000009607948,0.00018030056,0.064084694,0.000065122484,0.0003440452,0.9281336,0.0017326782,0.004616808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052182302,0.00011258517,0.009544792,0.0012592076,0.00006341008,0.0009341092,0.19199374,0.0010177471,0.0035052993,0.40587994,0.3854267,0.00021034623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015736224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013112525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027522117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011901406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044527953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14555264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2323144102","doi":"10.7227/gs.4.2.3","title":"‘What sort of grim adventure was it on which I had embarked?’: Lawyers, Vampires and the Melancholy of Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gothic Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Adventure; sort; Art; Law; Art history; Literature; Political science; Computer science; Database","score_opus":0.05538685041122185,"score_gpt":0.32829835478011926,"score_spread":0.27291150436889744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2323144102","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14880994,0.015313006,0.00088368147,0.63237077,0.0024688062,0.00003208484,0.000048736016,0.00004773994,0.20002526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8846852,0.0027280159,0.00035122197,0.06996723,0.00068689237,0.000031632197,0.000012797298,0.00008166338,0.04145529],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995704,0.0029547105,0.000072244504,0.00024565298,0.0003812964,0.0006421026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947025,0.0027528256,0.00069121626,0.00024639367,0.0006803212,0.00092681224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004837569,0.00036521294,0.0004002389,0.001270392,0.026727289,0.013622675,0.0014132641,0.008037475,0.005721701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01709295,0.0004865417,0.00018278773,0.0013138596,0.06006106,0.012775794,0.0051077185,0.014427755,0.00074679544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021023649,0.000023669869,0.0012670537,0.000050094783,0.00000900208,0.00041418552,0.72950774,0.000017184384,0.00011470375,0.21504843,0.046923593,0.0066033076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009682917,0.000016156004,0.0023963645,0.0002640647,0.000007111181,0.0003742008,0.62185496,0.000030453151,0.00016580329,0.040790085,0.33405736,0.000033725868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046908315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09287687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046908315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068322658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005645339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09327054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326291434","doi":"10.1017/s0003975612000422","title":"<scp>The Righteous Mind</scp> - About Jonathan Haidt The Righteous Mind (New York/Toronto, Pantheon Books, 2012).","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Sociology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Psychology; Cognitive science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.028804150957199882,"score_gpt":0.27260382331874283,"score_spread":0.24379967236154296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326291434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00050777255,0.1218398,0.0019300757,0.22709765,0.020436242,0.00003710151,0.00068561424,0.00068722526,0.6267785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009692843,0.030431738,0.001006434,0.03532037,0.0038116626,0.000054609354,0.00029230744,0.0006888936,0.91870105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999458,0.00014628195,0.000024862535,0.000066633,0.00024612734,0.000058040452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893326,0.0004159128,0.000055153272,0.00008175322,0.00031247025,0.00020152327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007962688,0.0006438353,0.00042018888,0.00083484524,0.0026435656,0.004047391,0.0007197754,0.0031840876,0.11950709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032641166,0.00040593388,0.0002717499,0.001169543,0.0022161452,0.0070714983,0.0017614195,0.0036785614,0.06421946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021652106,0.000002256738,0.000018539371,0.000030100491,5.657913e-7,0.000016823415,0.0001773168,0.0000045449756,0.000025757885,0.0062706107,0.9811109,0.012340284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011714727,0.0000018620249,0.00016062637,0.000101268015,5.831288e-7,0.00007295697,0.0002599958,0.0000108657105,0.00003763369,0.0029948936,0.9963548,0.00000338762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018957315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05265423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11950709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017891012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025014922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39979106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326498535","doi":"10.1177/0964663912458112","title":"Powers of Reach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Law; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Action (physics); Political science; Economic Justice; Statute; Tort; Law and economics","score_opus":0.05550966701075136,"score_gpt":0.38543304180021354,"score_spread":0.3299233747894622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326498535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009562436,0.0018468236,0.02411061,0.009308886,0.00024361027,0.00007803006,0.00008089026,0.00009716473,0.9546715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.891384,0.0017152362,0.006223699,0.0026732744,0.0004010204,0.00028963888,0.000095561416,0.00018918255,0.09702845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98930347,0.003811715,0.000629652,0.002348941,0.0024838026,0.0014224395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898039,0.005071481,0.0008034364,0.0019559772,0.0013561643,0.0010089722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009878553,0.0007094341,0.0008479054,0.0033701102,0.009038725,0.01422585,0.0017576187,0.004481608,0.021658678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020347213,0.000634816,0.0009069061,0.0024655003,0.04904009,0.014295836,0.016932312,0.005188509,0.0037239813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003436382,0.0000017168945,0.00012363204,0.000013428856,0.0000022623924,0.000028629487,0.0017474047,0.000050971474,0.000024901357,0.99455667,0.0007621029,0.0026849888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001343205,0.000016459364,0.0003029375,0.00017857109,0.0000127471885,0.00019346311,0.0021167574,0.00018783234,0.00012751366,0.85310996,0.1437253,0.000015097163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005715557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054502515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021658678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004248309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006425505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072455525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327046177","doi":"10.1086/686440","title":": <i>The Contracts of Fiction: Cognition, Culture, Community</i>","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Content (measure theory); History; Media studies; Sociology; Psychology; Mathematics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.01972560581150904,"score_gpt":0.28413934746617775,"score_spread":0.2644137416546687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327046177","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019270252,0.016416147,0.0043516243,0.4213995,0.003824958,0.000035823145,0.0006976177,0.00016586932,0.5338382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83508956,0.010418445,0.0023690264,0.034652818,0.0049160332,0.000070960894,0.000645718,0.0001749045,0.11166255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993129,0.00037340965,0.00002212306,0.00007159434,0.00016297307,0.000056952154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751556,0.0015879098,0.00021440952,0.00018101744,0.00033195384,0.00016917636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011563028,0.0002573495,0.00019144446,0.00090736814,0.0030020785,0.00670919,0.0005173829,0.0031338243,0.021759877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008007936,0.00010680656,0.00019595084,0.0016829226,0.0071394993,0.0074032946,0.0015512309,0.002426667,0.002390044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000234086,0.000009224873,0.0008721438,0.00019792955,0.000008915076,0.000073655094,0.02414239,0.00008074893,0.00015502397,0.5481837,0.3986119,0.027640965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008476089,0.000016303846,0.004975682,0.0006886374,0.000014043486,0.0005492595,0.021801192,0.00027486752,0.0004437087,0.1585215,0.8126837,0.00002267471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0097544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01166234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021759877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023891951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018324562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07279402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329707761","doi":"10.1017/s0829320100007018","title":"Queering Law: Not by <i>Vriend</i>","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Women and Children’s Health Research Institute; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Queer; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Gender studies","score_opus":0.017080999331598335,"score_gpt":0.23851040837737117,"score_spread":0.22142940904577282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329707761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015677346,0.012302129,0.0016245454,0.18269332,0.0013532366,0.00002116494,0.00006803103,0.000040132374,0.78622013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7517159,0.01003423,0.0008047531,0.035912033,0.0009623498,0.00005259255,0.000065017615,0.000086855456,0.20036633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677736,0.001250163,0.0000840888,0.00044868237,0.00082644913,0.0006132149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99668854,0.0014614444,0.0003895303,0.00030938882,0.0007377724,0.00041348673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002781027,0.00025714835,0.0003026547,0.0009196741,0.008646953,0.0148779,0.0010413756,0.0042466936,0.015083166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008010448,0.0001843729,0.00021020514,0.0012093667,0.021447275,0.005919958,0.0030446027,0.006258614,0.0015453913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055693386,0.000008390248,0.00032600234,0.000021472624,0.0000020280347,0.000038649803,0.005757354,0.00004221025,0.000049892173,0.9642344,0.022287024,0.007226982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008394262,0.000017724262,0.0014638654,0.00038534755,0.000007330304,0.000069824455,0.013420616,0.000095634605,0.00022917843,0.15013291,0.83414954,0.000019686066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.086695366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1108125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9133046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011858936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010925846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330205351","doi":"","title":"Introduction: (Re)Imagining Law: Marginalised Bodies/Indigenous Spaces","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.016453449269252192,"score_gpt":0.280365139265383,"score_spread":0.2639116899961308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330205351","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0082290135,0.03634765,0.012739899,0.5308263,0.027423821,0.00008058448,0.00051106216,0.0002066241,0.38363513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33067933,0.028407032,0.014560325,0.20275307,0.04019674,0.00036005507,0.0005263158,0.0010347035,0.3814824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983368,0.0007548845,0.000065904766,0.0002942067,0.00036268664,0.00018541675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972994,0.0019330771,0.00010409995,0.00015130226,0.00032971677,0.00018242549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019106177,0.0007527382,0.0005186017,0.0011864885,0.0055860034,0.007637,0.001654925,0.008318291,0.02058437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032146578,0.00028320646,0.0004991176,0.0015867951,0.018888699,0.01079329,0.0045687803,0.014072464,0.0034074134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009645207,0.000010795919,0.00012229898,0.00023650553,0.0000029216205,0.00011094754,0.027314758,0.00004685385,0.00019506842,0.80287606,0.15738524,0.011688908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003916186,0.000009834049,0.00035918888,0.00048073102,0.000004810793,0.0002296002,0.01295522,0.00010138617,0.0001531832,0.119108245,0.8665754,0.000018494828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008312453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011825317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02058437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029107637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026775913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068861604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332140173","doi":"10.2307/2901455","title":"Embodying Dislocation: A Mirror for Magistrates and Property Relations","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Dislocation; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Sociology; Criminology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Condensed matter physics; Physics","score_opus":0.02398034204013416,"score_gpt":0.2964136441281783,"score_spread":0.2724333020880441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332140173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7749492,0.0017081689,0.0099763265,0.025599785,0.00031290084,0.000014139382,0.000016615866,0.000101963196,0.18732087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994131,0.000108505985,0.00025497144,0.00029976122,0.000022632441,0.0000022606996,0.0000020282664,0.000014738899,0.005164049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703884,0.0016563666,0.00006880462,0.00027338395,0.0004470591,0.0005155659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983152,0.0005026346,0.00040309445,0.00040261747,0.00021755311,0.00015888439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004199391,0.00031073016,0.00032957975,0.0009159131,0.011338882,0.0066965898,0.0007858483,0.0023013384,0.0021954316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004689183,0.00030440572,0.0002581053,0.0006433222,0.048096914,0.007104571,0.008215146,0.003627032,0.00028612782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035315945,0.000011902553,0.0020507441,0.000013334448,0.0000065000045,0.00050249515,0.33058223,0.000061811705,0.0006018345,0.6555102,0.0014881227,0.009135579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029403413,0.00013695082,0.006761669,0.00015078146,0.00004102644,0.0019324928,0.42571792,0.00053855905,0.003292158,0.2894584,0.27183622,0.00010439158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011448375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012388457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011448375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032477921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020100551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023564517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334572056","doi":"10.1177/0964663912463631b","title":"Book Review: Framing Crime: Cultural Criminology and the Image","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Criminology; Cultural criminology; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.0597156188142693,"score_gpt":0.3839721397920155,"score_spread":0.3242565209777462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334572056","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000084283514,0.89178514,0.00028682573,0.053406544,0.044076987,0.000030026999,0.0001619172,0.000028569288,0.0101397885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016060056,0.8529258,0.0004301061,0.046072748,0.063122824,0.00010290523,0.00023057999,0.00008759963,0.035421412],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880755,0.00039438135,0.000080955484,0.00013183025,0.00051864504,0.00006658563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921483,0.0050467458,0.00044452652,0.00013730007,0.0018504082,0.00037283715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015659365,0.0013859061,0.0024279787,0.005307526,0.0012065863,0.0044259652,0.0017145723,0.005606093,0.02740098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008354514,0.0006286399,0.00070366764,0.009772403,0.0025439179,0.004143498,0.0014807872,0.0056403195,0.010168089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056995186,0.0000072445746,0.000028861938,0.0007574292,0.000008309717,0.000013622743,0.000027504686,0.000030262458,0.000016018726,0.0014138548,0.9767576,0.02093363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012941599,0.000012748774,0.00031592554,0.0030045963,0.000025199952,0.00015183145,0.00008735909,0.00003503719,0.00002269706,0.0028896795,0.99343127,0.00001058905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012905096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038060565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02740098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003712773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005336962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09166539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337056941","doi":"10.1080/14791420.2016.1173220","title":"Preaching dynamite: August Spies at the Haymarket trial","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Dynamite; Flagging; Commit; False accusation; Law; Political science; History; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07477184809875051,"score_gpt":0.40274461815494605,"score_spread":0.3279727700561955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337056941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86000544,0.0007213355,0.0022757954,0.0068992535,0.00025331858,0.000022419008,0.000026299113,0.000033316734,0.12976289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920059,0.00015922706,0.00020045985,0.00063401053,0.000039032362,0.000005835469,0.00000963614,0.00001768862,0.006928183],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881065,0.0005732025,0.000033780347,0.00011403325,0.00024420582,0.000224076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861145,0.0007251633,0.00027807642,0.00008300265,0.00016053498,0.00014163813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012944285,0.00022564408,0.00018472168,0.00066258817,0.00775192,0.0035557465,0.000409546,0.0015067339,0.003113124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005282266,0.00022157055,0.00012460166,0.000392536,0.011213985,0.0050934474,0.0039471295,0.0036127248,0.00036091727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001535854,0.000058585756,0.008425972,0.00008816244,0.000015889238,0.003976454,0.7640223,0.00014378919,0.0038163313,0.18754385,0.009349299,0.022405837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018217337,0.00014243105,0.02216608,0.00023159929,0.0000180865,0.0024495318,0.7441019,0.00033822094,0.0037974166,0.027874228,0.19878355,0.00007878401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007877646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01936209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007877646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031154067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011982933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022603929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337088531","doi":"","title":"Critical Theory and Aboriginal Rights","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Critical theory; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Relation (database); Law; Political science; Geography; Philosophy; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0040158955962379195,"score_gpt":0.2931509686457689,"score_spread":0.28913507304953096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337088531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032330215,0.026049547,0.011127855,0.12422426,0.0007429275,0.00008009565,0.000059353166,0.000047016834,0.80533856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395389,0.007811143,0.0026098897,0.0053183795,0.000335205,0.000082483544,0.000029062756,0.000047669935,0.044227276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99495393,0.002916788,0.00007887609,0.0002984874,0.00075494667,0.000997002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939319,0.0036369395,0.00036404876,0.000276359,0.0012176113,0.00057312957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006158666,0.0005481756,0.00043020735,0.0030780535,0.016429866,0.0095776245,0.0016562657,0.003082266,0.004554416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007899878,0.00018203669,0.00034345663,0.0027282243,0.08435266,0.0052950643,0.003940354,0.0039268127,0.00025906312],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020674802,0.0000033901804,0.00008888739,0.00002444522,0.0000013158619,0.000046485424,0.007643425,0.00009423452,0.000012536271,0.98785967,0.0024256308,0.0017979556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000080459085,0.00000864853,0.00050276046,0.00034954885,0.000006719711,0.00007192561,0.025785698,0.00033078922,0.000114936476,0.8263563,0.14645313,0.00001150676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43288562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3462482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43288562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05499899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041610703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8607319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337134072","doi":"10.1177/1056492615616872","title":"<i>The Corporation</i> 10 Years On","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management Inquiry","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Scholarship; Sociology; Media studies; Power (physics); Filmmaking; Law; Management; Political science; Movie theater; History; Art history","score_opus":0.07440961775973046,"score_gpt":0.3323512545719795,"score_spread":0.257941636812249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337134072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009543935,0.022692032,0.0005584025,0.114835545,0.014617929,0.000048387665,0.00049126305,0.00013922756,0.8370733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1396116,0.01264916,0.0004932277,0.036304306,0.0033326668,0.000040028055,0.00032308107,0.00021918707,0.8070268],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989016,0.00015147294,0.000020257425,0.00010473699,0.0004018699,0.0004200109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993267,0.000058719816,0.00004733395,0.000044413835,0.00031017637,0.00021268055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043356084,0.00038451105,0.00022021066,0.0008924744,0.0074513415,0.0075139618,0.0007048599,0.0021964826,0.03560018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018779285,0.00021529729,0.0002454275,0.0011202925,0.0047502806,0.0032712347,0.0021763938,0.0053460393,0.006554707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037103626,0.000014649997,0.00050773175,0.00010043338,0.0000045201245,0.00027044106,0.009783838,0.000021754013,0.000682158,0.08066907,0.88228464,0.025623662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010200386,0.000005310163,0.0006356679,0.0000858288,0.0000012937977,0.000045698107,0.002188409,0.000006953853,0.000107516455,0.0003341724,0.9965835,0.0000046047585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40957123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59931624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40957123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014094458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006093607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8143745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338217353","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002393","title":"Making Inclusive Positivism Compatible with Razian Authority","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Positivism; Legal positivism; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Morality; Order (exchange); Universal law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Economics","score_opus":0.03135342173081904,"score_gpt":0.3331496247278377,"score_spread":0.3017962029970187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338217353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11207046,0.0013533859,0.20497783,0.052276984,0.00069662114,0.00013970849,0.000084608364,0.00021605277,0.6281843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96700436,0.0003065873,0.02121952,0.0018515113,0.00014956428,0.00011210942,0.000027189433,0.000054288626,0.009274921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99103045,0.004523321,0.0004669571,0.0010727105,0.0020919105,0.0008145562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99087244,0.0038649663,0.00093186466,0.00187457,0.0016225503,0.00083363015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010798449,0.00041880668,0.0006000123,0.0013812832,0.0041669523,0.007897063,0.0012916722,0.0025197493,0.0035287165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016762652,0.0004401523,0.0009530985,0.00066360657,0.02597128,0.013135375,0.0096137095,0.0053850044,0.00074101135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067447654,0.000006235771,0.0001139062,0.000007159956,0.0000021453725,0.000028704713,0.0013426231,0.00009565026,0.000078924306,0.99659663,0.00030492243,0.0014163634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000135830805,0.000008877776,0.00012636113,0.000019933208,0.000005668981,0.000026487869,0.00047929864,0.0005156041,0.00015428232,0.9882917,0.010351766,0.000006557564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026826207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035019042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010798449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004677263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004446123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057108343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339993195","doi":"10.1177/0964663915601166","title":"‘We Are the Monitors Now’","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Situated; Experiential knowledge; Conversation; Citizen science; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.09591162350397524,"score_gpt":0.38051553303380575,"score_spread":0.2846039095298305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339993195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14405975,0.006915456,0.024707492,0.38906616,0.0021172762,0.0002157394,0.00044963075,0.0004900712,0.43197852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86143064,0.0030962117,0.0056981817,0.03159346,0.00024950504,0.0000904075,0.00018962183,0.00014576752,0.09750625],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950282,0.0014737002,0.000093375864,0.0009055501,0.0014179506,0.0010812876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99437886,0.0008328578,0.0006273582,0.00046876143,0.0024829356,0.0012092888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034203094,0.00044731158,0.00036381738,0.0009042162,0.014068489,0.0070413826,0.0014620954,0.0028748398,0.011491427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012311445,0.00047919515,0.00031443377,0.0012298422,0.026043897,0.009679518,0.0036128156,0.0061941994,0.0024016097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006342688,0.000069560614,0.022612162,0.00027942873,0.00003985714,0.0012598691,0.55751985,0.00021875897,0.0034515527,0.20327386,0.13342781,0.07778381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007853802,0.000034718134,0.009513144,0.0002948668,0.000029706951,0.00053393503,0.15327945,0.00013318201,0.00073224417,0.013732479,0.8216439,0.000064563676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56185347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6681018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56185347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01294088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021972036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88145375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340761243","doi":"","title":"Justice in Paradise by Bruce Clark (review)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paradise; Economic Justice; Sociology; Art history; Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.042161396487713575,"score_gpt":0.3140715936636686,"score_spread":0.27191019717595505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340761243","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000706698,0.7447212,0.00003273941,0.20930825,0.041363124,0.000012482076,0.00010513473,0.000010344058,0.0043760086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038298108,0.6546161,0.00019092398,0.2661003,0.04774829,0.00006215543,0.00019103254,0.000047313097,0.027214035],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956221,0.0010338232,0.00035313214,0.0004517372,0.0020454403,0.0004937627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98793495,0.0034595176,0.0007644663,0.00031552347,0.005921766,0.0016038502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053033764,0.0012140129,0.0021694025,0.005444814,0.0037749205,0.0057429727,0.002231441,0.009038681,0.009496014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023405384,0.00067746115,0.0007754018,0.007557151,0.0040428364,0.003801947,0.0027526398,0.007873603,0.0033373418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070238293,0.0000026711007,0.00003473722,0.0003258587,0.000009054281,0.000016139691,0.000045562247,0.0000072366233,0.000005823853,0.00081848016,0.98829067,0.010436735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012624481,0.000005581895,0.00065007864,0.0024230063,0.000025794918,0.000068530295,0.00012264872,0.0000051578863,0.0000094155985,0.00088445767,0.99578166,0.000011127507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23970914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46537513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76029086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013444639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0351696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47662777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340946344","doi":"","title":"Following Digital Media into the Courtroom: Publicity and the Open Court Principle in the Information Age","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Publicity; Publication; Economic Justice; Democracy; Narrative; Social media; Freedom of the press; Normative; Supreme court; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.05299997535309214,"score_gpt":0.3500924784065506,"score_spread":0.29709250305345847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340946344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076398045,0.0034826633,0.01459327,0.09383985,0.00038004154,0.00005845371,0.00007113473,0.000083514315,0.81109303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9720561,0.00094790827,0.0013006907,0.0056312066,0.00016973063,0.0000466749,0.000012149407,0.00003209308,0.01980349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834383,0.00967506,0.0005234427,0.0015320656,0.0030052694,0.0018257822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98011976,0.014091195,0.0012350004,0.0016408061,0.001549953,0.0013632298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010612689,0.0003123346,0.00040077665,0.0019779152,0.024438813,0.033565715,0.0021125267,0.0076563046,0.007820195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02270611,0.00065157213,0.00034173767,0.0021164857,0.08087966,0.018307976,0.013643596,0.008552555,0.00091923133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000090117155,0.000014827657,0.00036528183,0.00002226171,0.0000027744634,0.00018442805,0.026719423,0.0001222434,0.00011003013,0.9618065,0.00285093,0.0077922028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004130513,0.000060212198,0.0028203432,0.00072160945,0.00003152011,0.0003068284,0.066140704,0.00087594613,0.0013047185,0.5956943,0.33187053,0.0001319657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13326783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14678559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13326783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02103061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020539653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26498425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341916793","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1459","title":"Book Review: A Life in Struggle With the Law - Review of: J. B. McLachlan: A Biography, by David Frank","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.010868842037203754,"score_gpt":0.2712530082833757,"score_spread":0.26038416624617194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341916793","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033121277,0.39020908,0.00059220725,0.45894903,0.11045039,0.000042325337,0.00020708231,0.00015061306,0.039068013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01119664,0.308373,0.0013611317,0.2513668,0.12967543,0.0001436127,0.00044346708,0.0003993873,0.2970406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505866,0.0009828211,0.0003180105,0.0003239634,0.0030979712,0.0002185227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9744821,0.009882328,0.0015820911,0.0008771107,0.010946609,0.0022297774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046472223,0.0006432131,0.0014836462,0.0044680852,0.003218593,0.008668472,0.0018143826,0.006744939,0.015557518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036469437,0.0005729435,0.0004976822,0.0051299483,0.0034852275,0.0054688,0.0016199782,0.007247402,0.01205608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014688926,0.0000014514306,0.000016977645,0.000053743515,0.0000016342998,0.000016860005,0.00002850154,0.00000939148,0.000016000973,0.0012878508,0.99217814,0.0063878456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015240264,0.0000029804944,0.00009669709,0.00022338826,0.0000028578904,0.000069079535,0.000057523535,0.000014118356,0.000016962089,0.0007105228,0.99879897,0.0000054230077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013723333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042281773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015557518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006441501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01280115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052045107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2343486302","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005890","title":"From Raz's Nexus to Legal Normativity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Obligation; Normative; Notice; Action (physics); Nexus (standard); Relation (database); Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy of law; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Comparative law","score_opus":0.02802894008032529,"score_gpt":0.36485851352266924,"score_spread":0.33682957344234393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2343486302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032875367,0.004826452,0.0653781,0.08714978,0.0009525789,0.00004224107,0.0002572776,0.00023111932,0.8082872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563724,0.0011790934,0.009627413,0.004388804,0.0005095694,0.000051546278,0.00008125811,0.00009424092,0.02769572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935907,0.0032856509,0.0003239671,0.00080020487,0.0014760612,0.0005234951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944699,0.0030156188,0.00047339272,0.00086611684,0.00088952825,0.00028550718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052814973,0.00032277973,0.00052183424,0.0012869916,0.0035267984,0.0065677892,0.0011900114,0.0031349997,0.0095425565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012674942,0.00026948377,0.0005737735,0.0010388008,0.027893296,0.009092682,0.0037944503,0.004379699,0.0012819977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058947553,0.0000015115007,0.000039790375,0.000008910505,9.26884e-7,0.000008271838,0.00041653495,0.00003300661,0.000019074323,0.9972602,0.0008413002,0.0013644214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055513133,0.000006507614,0.0001096769,0.000020546453,0.0000023408425,0.000028174421,0.00037348084,0.00017422413,0.000059964535,0.9786558,0.02055809,0.000005699931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050673615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004304623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0095425565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003551716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026265662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031922996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344002375","doi":"10.4000/map.2081","title":"De quelques problèmes épistémologiques dans la théorie du cinéma","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Mise au point","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009871986825514531,"score_gpt":0.256796483214671,"score_spread":0.24692449638915648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344002375","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04319947,0.07275988,0.22532174,0.49219856,0.005301361,0.00011158344,0.00027952436,0.00017211294,0.16065581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87039894,0.035595663,0.05327168,0.017760774,0.008861508,0.0004184501,0.00018556521,0.000275723,0.013231757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9695181,0.019507367,0.0011285783,0.0037604913,0.004918236,0.0011672829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89318615,0.08173668,0.004165673,0.009142767,0.009801762,0.0019669554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.053446133,0.0010911402,0.0017487321,0.008301344,0.010059546,0.022401337,0.0043476135,0.00842931,0.006845344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0765153,0.0011013917,0.001730129,0.005816189,0.09215725,0.049454536,0.010675723,0.015678823,0.0014468286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012864278,0.000019067098,0.00045657632,0.00015396297,0.000020337277,0.000040123785,0.0074703484,0.0002374889,0.00005216904,0.9838833,0.0015827814,0.006070828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011038564,0.000010279344,0.00027013448,0.00025478538,0.000010107091,0.00006365159,0.007245767,0.0007823302,0.00010433809,0.9689859,0.022243721,0.00001796119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008203973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008815783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053446133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009504652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008489256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2826535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344815150","doi":"10.1177/1743872115603665","title":"Truth Commission Discourse and the Aesthetics of Reconciliation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Commission; Confession (law); Testimonial; Spectacle; Law; Aesthetics; Materiality (auditing); Sociology; Forgiveness; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04915393180586895,"score_gpt":0.2950421446103727,"score_spread":0.24588821280450374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344815150","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05845356,0.009415429,0.041098524,0.08050353,0.0017133822,0.000085407424,0.00007463925,0.00028092635,0.80837464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797468,0.0007907425,0.0036085066,0.0015159772,0.00031130464,0.000051173916,0.000024017922,0.0001173919,0.013834081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760691,0.016657861,0.00047201567,0.001295548,0.0037520258,0.0017534415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98816967,0.0068843295,0.0012588814,0.001729429,0.0013220741,0.000635608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016616521,0.000897492,0.0005794559,0.004499926,0.023480538,0.025545388,0.002930136,0.0068637063,0.005500949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025592737,0.00048959034,0.0006072246,0.0030857332,0.12576245,0.015787644,0.014552192,0.006543139,0.000580843],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070161655,0.0000025613194,0.00007089875,0.000025730578,0.0000025273205,0.000102642465,0.05903116,0.00010869633,0.000051804094,0.9360369,0.0014722274,0.0030877725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023108345,0.000020159725,0.00035725313,0.00037165565,0.000019838833,0.0003629092,0.091074675,0.0006817031,0.0005273222,0.6520475,0.2544779,0.00003609963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022556871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01664337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025545388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019734835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012124926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14318693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346429138","doi":"","title":"An Exploration of Fairness: Interdisciplinary Inquires in Law, Science and the Humanities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Normative; Situated; Sociology; Obligation; Epistemology; Citizenship; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.0249614526485475,"score_gpt":0.3164981971425727,"score_spread":0.2915367444940252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346429138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033366654,0.22880924,0.036390357,0.31896004,0.0045507513,0.00007740918,0.00005942678,0.00007483426,0.37771124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.820076,0.10673663,0.017152628,0.029232098,0.0062077153,0.0003228092,0.000046431556,0.00016188688,0.020063786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883789,0.009439404,0.00019088271,0.00045814362,0.0010309642,0.00050171756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788466,0.019083777,0.00046880252,0.0005809665,0.00048580676,0.00053400866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012421778,0.0006427593,0.0010336052,0.003727172,0.0129931085,0.0147941625,0.001479614,0.0063377894,0.0027763073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012597908,0.00051188667,0.00071282324,0.0050166235,0.0617672,0.02409983,0.008947632,0.011176187,0.00038634194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042694064,0.000009859304,0.00010954312,0.00004875738,0.0000027200078,0.00003351787,0.019255344,0.0001328181,0.00004009292,0.9707345,0.0034338036,0.0061947578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028705456,0.000009772945,0.00017001777,0.00037870937,0.0000023403475,0.0000637948,0.013896099,0.0002123812,0.000039942977,0.9057979,0.07941716,0.000008931414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020713215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022662156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0147941625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007093325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005151814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06569338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2354183981","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270972.013.0013","title":"Law and Obligations","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal positivism; Obligation; Private law; Skepticism; Political science; Philosophy of law; Legitimacy; Civil law (Civil law); Subversion; Public law; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019161736871716482,"score_gpt":0.22777972918534614,"score_spread":0.20861799231362965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2354183981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00991229,0.01338574,0.0145078795,0.05578079,0.0008732278,0.000036581696,0.00005097441,0.000054421645,0.90539813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85056907,0.0123656,0.00722469,0.020402607,0.0016995941,0.00019551026,0.000091728245,0.000120081524,0.10733115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994156,0.002973446,0.00025791308,0.00072938,0.0014152994,0.00046803328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941659,0.0038045158,0.00039570607,0.00061196316,0.0007123134,0.0003096405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064089354,0.00045546304,0.00050262717,0.0014410733,0.0059381495,0.008522598,0.0011177937,0.0048173955,0.009938286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012044346,0.00035952425,0.00032501106,0.0010786066,0.051541183,0.012582377,0.0057053417,0.0055073933,0.0016789321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.012392e-7,0.0000014241933,0.00003155343,0.0000064873507,4.5743982e-7,0.000008197229,0.00058741594,0.000027868573,0.000011558371,0.9964031,0.0009170255,0.0020040006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035090518,0.0000053817184,0.00013907923,0.00011715131,0.0000016859574,0.000043965734,0.0007559992,0.000097499746,0.0000450736,0.9079202,0.090864114,0.0000063836997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066840504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042751627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009938286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005631827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063884174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040861905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2357680838","doi":"10.29173/alr429","title":"Showing Remorse: Law and the Social Control of Emotion , Richard Weisman (Burlington, VA: Ashgate, 2014)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Remorse; Law; Psychology; Control (management); Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Criminology; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Management","score_opus":0.015146873258824613,"score_gpt":0.2839192017885122,"score_spread":0.2687723285296876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2357680838","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000696278,0.72262925,0.001099656,0.23007275,0.0035466691,0.000011674838,0.000089405694,0.000036072564,0.041818112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.101959474,0.6392518,0.0028041475,0.085215166,0.011590934,0.00014987665,0.00015055828,0.00016080383,0.15871714],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811757,0.0010312397,0.000071833376,0.00019797358,0.00046784768,0.00011348442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996385,0.0026260344,0.00015008262,0.00011958487,0.00052274537,0.00019649761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033696569,0.00086694246,0.0006422483,0.0015253585,0.0043666195,0.009324026,0.0015416346,0.008569878,0.0085913725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00926473,0.0006850571,0.00039056086,0.0026572833,0.014163688,0.008294437,0.0017651737,0.0067495657,0.0021540124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000267837,0.00003351359,0.00032100512,0.00024407303,0.000020674706,0.00007142252,0.00305657,0.00022432029,0.0001144209,0.23612396,0.7006782,0.059084985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024066656,0.000014860077,0.0030675025,0.0015213251,0.000025312385,0.0001583662,0.00494117,0.00024944553,0.00014723801,0.17268173,0.8171283,0.00004067933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09917518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20138189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09917518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064655724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007852786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19719583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W235901574","doi":"","title":"Table ronde : Être réalisateur professionnel de courts au Québec","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.007317856557127071,"score_gpt":0.18302196876522608,"score_spread":0.175704112208099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W235901574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1937373,0.028426776,0.008745385,0.12378417,0.003962522,0.0005887138,0.007351638,0.0011545434,0.63224894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32716227,0.0049129534,0.0037231145,0.005550867,0.00036327817,0.00016706581,0.0010732325,0.00013339084,0.6569139],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962888,0.00061945006,0.00014063809,0.00038935992,0.0014593746,0.0011023609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996002,0.00083431083,0.00016544785,0.00014733519,0.0017407503,0.0011102194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023367163,0.00052736455,0.0004860566,0.0016333502,0.008116797,0.006266587,0.0011644707,0.004387058,0.05623737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005125776,0.00047576995,0.0006429563,0.0017923376,0.0015435882,0.0018833318,0.0015322113,0.003774879,0.0028325876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046912674,0.00030049056,0.041134913,0.0006607358,0.00012002315,0.004343025,0.0110692745,0.0038861532,0.0053566042,0.21250358,0.47566816,0.24448796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006237161,0.00007113477,0.054766633,0.00025213088,0.00002236091,0.0003552277,0.004308185,0.0009569787,0.00064600684,0.0014067837,0.9370799,0.00007237684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9651011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9710192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05623737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04136696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07246715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30013973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2372909987","doi":"10.1177/0090591703253187","title":"“Words Cloth'd in Reason's Garb”","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Aesthetics; Environmental ethics; Art","score_opus":0.017672029352490872,"score_gpt":0.31797949797955105,"score_spread":0.3003074686270602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2372909987","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072447434,0.012716739,0.024372082,0.46730974,0.023783533,0.00004405019,0.00017582628,0.00029580458,0.46405742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47004893,0.004182902,0.010548095,0.18571086,0.010286912,0.00026309918,0.00013351464,0.0004796392,0.31834602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958912,0.0025021697,0.00017002018,0.00041830307,0.00067127607,0.00034700855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656147,0.0020046097,0.00022289675,0.00053761806,0.00046129312,0.00021207688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003855735,0.00077660265,0.000629806,0.0017734921,0.0058474154,0.008246387,0.0010832342,0.0079106325,0.0075651812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010367242,0.00040767065,0.0007194466,0.0013738791,0.040891763,0.008423868,0.0029685404,0.012851921,0.002126105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053578524,0.0000024869748,0.000028797805,0.000012735795,0.0000028250545,0.000010941908,0.0013553164,0.000024488678,0.000024870664,0.9678315,0.028933166,0.0017674703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009918107,0.000007630637,0.00013888234,0.000090949856,0.000008953447,0.000048173508,0.0016026484,0.00012548531,0.00013209283,0.6017408,0.3960775,0.000017055041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009239536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010928541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009239536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041304086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028572578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029968321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2373091120","doi":"10.24415/9789087282400","title":"Terrorists on Trial. A Performative Perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Leiden University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Bielefeld; University of Toronto; Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences; University of Oxford; Fordham University; Raymond and Beverly Sackler Institute for Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Yale University; Universiteit Utrecht; West Virginia University; Princeton University; Universiteit Leiden; University of Cambridge; Yale University; Temple University; U.S. Department of Homeland Security","keywords":"Performative utterance; Perspective (graphical); History; Art; Aesthetics; Visual arts","score_opus":0.03055503691524957,"score_gpt":0.2699134349048948,"score_spread":0.2393583979896452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2373091120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001551407,0.0044940324,0.00087278796,0.01703348,0.0009161196,0.00002110505,0.000022061358,0.000018094886,0.975071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2422069,0.008407428,0.0012630525,0.026055995,0.0030934685,0.0001967492,0.00008775913,0.00020562037,0.71848315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99415046,0.003359205,0.00012764217,0.00049128756,0.001028549,0.0008428353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980149,0.00097593345,0.00015638182,0.00026303416,0.00032681695,0.00026289996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044461777,0.0009034954,0.00039806982,0.0013050267,0.01067599,0.014613583,0.0015726374,0.0076328097,0.014016695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060157757,0.00034625045,0.0005034582,0.0011224844,0.03921333,0.00874999,0.003955548,0.008344056,0.0044645485],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034202023,0.000005380518,0.000020915622,0.00001531522,7.546651e-7,0.000035701,0.0035804487,0.000052450552,0.000017278157,0.96726537,0.026417961,0.0025848418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009055361,0.000016608441,0.00016888216,0.00032947544,0.0000030833946,0.000114889655,0.0065971673,0.000104585175,0.00014290464,0.21060774,0.7818941,0.0000115382045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014633989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021301508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014633989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00955134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00845185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069300175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2383346827","doi":"10.33137/cal.v1i2.22160","title":"Uncovering the Latent Disunity of Property Law?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogical self; Property (philosophy); State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.031500243983139456,"score_gpt":0.3200148942817202,"score_spread":0.28851465029858075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2383346827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24707858,0.012288862,0.11902748,0.23833133,0.0007788373,0.00006766384,0.000093821254,0.00023673556,0.38209668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930484,0.00080537115,0.0020548278,0.0014562487,0.0001326851,0.000031357114,0.000013025249,0.000044400684,0.002413547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995471,0.0026559208,0.0001165656,0.000673914,0.000589312,0.00049335783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841101,0.010992185,0.0014520268,0.0022323197,0.000694803,0.0005184567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008717073,0.00033172392,0.0006457566,0.0021569028,0.006236204,0.008568241,0.0014666679,0.0026995658,0.0039132284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017872477,0.0004231034,0.00038656406,0.0014914228,0.094139606,0.028320404,0.007404854,0.0056398064,0.00032055212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043047253,0.0000051384845,0.00017641019,0.000014532994,0.0000019013719,0.00001966614,0.005218208,0.00004957864,0.000051799594,0.992088,0.00040533347,0.00196527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000436661,0.0000044054354,0.0001507708,0.00003180822,0.000001733988,0.000019814639,0.003210584,0.00017524997,0.00009924521,0.98695624,0.009341345,0.000004435738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033724108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003681432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008717073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005148489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004136894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046100855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2397744768","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1081","title":"Book Notes: Feminized Justice, by Amanda Glasbeek","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03140616313867266,"score_gpt":0.2813349478703472,"score_spread":0.2499287847316745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2397744768","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000642747,0.17217264,0.0010708328,0.61593336,0.035224367,0.0000491969,0.00037114244,0.000084742285,0.17445102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012750285,0.07595094,0.001452453,0.2399905,0.024105936,0.00025420732,0.00024737613,0.00039387518,0.6448545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890685,0.00040367505,0.000042596163,0.00015157778,0.0004054854,0.00008974933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971066,0.0020811558,0.00008155215,0.00012294012,0.00048176447,0.00012604342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017605083,0.0009124859,0.00069033913,0.0017317844,0.008004403,0.006668963,0.0013422673,0.008824716,0.016206179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066791573,0.0006786741,0.00036749407,0.0026264351,0.0068248757,0.00954848,0.0025089812,0.010356777,0.0065282523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004125176,0.0000057472107,0.000020271316,0.000038340855,9.2795e-7,0.000017038608,0.0005462798,0.000026778256,0.000020821202,0.027147725,0.9665891,0.0055828146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004734838,0.0000031854386,0.00017855302,0.00024094143,0.0000018982253,0.000029736311,0.0011267994,0.000029906181,0.000040151313,0.019463405,0.97887164,0.000009094561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06399837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20179398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06399837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054561356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006049144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12725174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2407952138","doi":"10.3138/utq.85.2.01","title":"Literature and Law: Consensus and the Art of Disagreement","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Taste; Verdict; Immediacy; Irony; Relevance (law); Law; Judgement; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.005914024514354484,"score_gpt":0.20475756936014444,"score_spread":0.19884354484578995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2407952138","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063162215,0.036630977,0.05349381,0.30699202,0.0029243426,0.00008456,0.00011555326,0.00024059309,0.53635585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745317,0.004009846,0.0051633706,0.0057295873,0.0013523548,0.000103077604,0.000037591104,0.00010439574,0.008968093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9387962,0.043624353,0.0018042314,0.0039005454,0.009470385,0.0024041557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9384689,0.04547631,0.0037304314,0.005990937,0.0047955317,0.0015380159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040549163,0.00076011266,0.0014153792,0.009462631,0.023292748,0.030529821,0.0037735896,0.012821092,0.005094025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07979285,0.0007124056,0.00091440673,0.0075048427,0.16907269,0.036230344,0.018949578,0.009316441,0.0011980115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010089593,0.00000539953,0.00013618186,0.000042107706,0.000006336938,0.000079184654,0.021658279,0.00016693928,0.000032148066,0.9696229,0.0027942143,0.0054461705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000128913525,0.0000070701262,0.00009170226,0.00014743471,0.0000044891585,0.000049768492,0.009484793,0.00018793522,0.00005182903,0.9613819,0.02856783,0.000012308408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045561376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003328223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040549163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011788554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009999093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21444702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2419535974","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2016v41n2a3068","title":"The Rashomon Effect and Communication","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Closure (psychology); Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science; Positive economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.011239079709510078,"score_gpt":0.273635232771657,"score_spread":0.2623961530621469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2419535974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15665692,0.005578747,0.011769618,0.10667836,0.001036678,0.00007271136,0.00018350671,0.000097411445,0.7179261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857939,0.0009050401,0.0010123082,0.0027035954,0.00022281849,0.000039438648,0.00001999494,0.000029784564,0.009273207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969013,0.0019636652,0.00006945938,0.00026450452,0.00056424673,0.00023691995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894699,0.007643339,0.0010063584,0.0010053224,0.00059241604,0.00028264138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003315845,0.00026938718,0.00021613028,0.0010740806,0.0035920131,0.0040027695,0.00054211495,0.0022059062,0.011859976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018903527,0.00019985046,0.00025478916,0.00095761276,0.021826562,0.0063714175,0.0053343656,0.00361596,0.00062270364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045706256,0.000007807355,0.001334133,0.00007315815,0.000008165824,0.00017040955,0.016883174,0.000121168385,0.000267961,0.9681342,0.0044689644,0.008485063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009189838,0.000071623384,0.00791675,0.0003410709,0.000034734996,0.00062457385,0.033447247,0.0009720192,0.0010676102,0.6752063,0.28016263,0.0000634973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051925867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033640887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011859976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040691905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013244717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039675593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2435814675","doi":"10.1007/s10691-016-9321-0","title":"Sarah Keenan: Subversive Property: Law and the Production of Spaces of Belonging","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Public international law; Property (philosophy); Political philosophy; Production (economics); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; International law; Politics; Epistemology; Economics","score_opus":0.0227574983672201,"score_gpt":0.28407745482752195,"score_spread":0.26131995646030187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2435814675","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010141659,0.03886497,0.0020029158,0.88599306,0.0029840858,0.000030799678,0.00012789921,0.000023768796,0.059830878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47599602,0.048523318,0.005620452,0.25376943,0.005782463,0.00031096354,0.00011100385,0.00018155546,0.20970483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783736,0.0013112709,0.000071980234,0.00028266618,0.00032261547,0.00017416685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99138826,0.0069540557,0.00027446006,0.00027343593,0.000693395,0.00041649846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003913331,0.0007061003,0.00059025316,0.0010968967,0.007904546,0.008545086,0.0023428036,0.016502447,0.009653914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008526463,0.0005587749,0.00037096278,0.0011502742,0.021287411,0.027375702,0.003673551,0.015847376,0.0015323836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044783697,0.000035904362,0.00036512388,0.00017167657,0.000008194661,0.00020093261,0.052260585,0.00009917776,0.00022096644,0.7493511,0.18636917,0.010872383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029805435,0.000022309536,0.0013332919,0.0008567073,0.000012426887,0.0002942067,0.061324876,0.0002418605,0.00083664665,0.3691654,0.5658183,0.000064159394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02021825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054966696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02021825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031995422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041338815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040201128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2438200302","doi":"10.1080/2049677x.2016.1176358","title":"Codification, transplants and history: law reform in Louisiana (1808) and Quebec (1866)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Legal History","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law reform; Law; Legal history; Political science; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.05511757056561642,"score_gpt":0.28249221683676196,"score_spread":0.22737464627114554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2438200302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6306476,0.036834892,0.00093306066,0.08181565,0.00069090526,0.000108296656,0.0016847437,0.00007806574,0.24720676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87706673,0.004477269,0.00034784657,0.0030585974,0.000098427474,0.00003301929,0.00022628938,0.000026997817,0.1146649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989833,0.00022638531,0.000029283376,0.00010091041,0.00024530926,0.00041475368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984755,0.00035755135,0.0001831597,0.000059969363,0.0006739101,0.00024982903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015254014,0.00020307736,0.00025875284,0.0017831103,0.011049471,0.0039220094,0.0012583344,0.00208411,0.006927489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004166652,0.00017868228,0.00019131253,0.0033607206,0.008357616,0.0020818987,0.0015295139,0.0023372788,0.0003287563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016334737,0.000107159125,0.031516857,0.00017549198,0.000037779286,0.0006811218,0.12332824,0.001866241,0.00065221527,0.6328308,0.082592845,0.12604791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029244004,0.000055823515,0.10969322,0.0004220776,0.000024938405,0.0001416994,0.03720509,0.0009801036,0.0006404041,0.010106568,0.8405909,0.00010997045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14722754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14722754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06783725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98909515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460442733","doi":"10.4000/lexis.251","title":"Metaphors in English for Law: Let Us Keep Them!","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lexis","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Presumption; Object (grammar); Law; Interpretation (philosophy); Doctrine; Epistemology; Constitution; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.025653483761703004,"score_gpt":0.2879788687426792,"score_spread":0.2623253849809762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460442733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015189753,0.16432908,0.03003483,0.35267848,0.015752507,0.00011618179,0.0005388539,0.00036540398,0.420995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71932083,0.0671116,0.028409926,0.0696724,0.014811944,0.00042791,0.00069320394,0.001253571,0.09829862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706286,0.0019902003,0.000104452716,0.00016601087,0.00044997982,0.00022638601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702305,0.0015646459,0.00019244748,0.00025294814,0.0007408556,0.00022609734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023815597,0.0009935569,0.0007392168,0.0017868485,0.00529515,0.008323883,0.0011678004,0.0026740064,0.012456303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008740925,0.00036982403,0.0004264562,0.0017205481,0.017809426,0.024325969,0.0040526283,0.00978608,0.0044312505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030602765,0.00002120485,0.00026195325,0.0003881555,0.000009239415,0.0003425823,0.06931218,0.00006440081,0.00047778198,0.7910105,0.111560345,0.026521083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012585881,0.00001725335,0.0005539893,0.00067729794,0.000008175001,0.00054038625,0.02308692,0.00016122976,0.00013493779,0.106722146,0.86805505,0.000029889628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008178668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063775335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012456303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033258656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002083282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04167044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461017807","doi":"","title":"Legal Rhetoric in Canadian Society","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Political science; Legal writing; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Legal research; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.006588754050461471,"score_gpt":0.2557498245075632,"score_spread":0.2491610704571017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461017807","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20837234,0.008345852,0.0009181706,0.15452562,0.0009902923,0.000081282444,0.0007365999,0.00014665344,0.62588316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92623186,0.0024817605,0.00057113677,0.0058812043,0.00014180814,0.000030114074,0.0001144647,0.00007503385,0.06447272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99056304,0.0014938272,0.00026214842,0.00081139937,0.0037221215,0.0031474244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97330564,0.007047425,0.0011520525,0.00048204197,0.012911546,0.0051013124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005921981,0.00049132126,0.000783447,0.009789875,0.05747531,0.022484595,0.0029180578,0.005282211,0.024279565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032297295,0.0006668497,0.0005335662,0.013709638,0.019753054,0.0045587164,0.004461392,0.0072560115,0.0009282977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009602806,0.00007127439,0.009459899,0.00017713729,0.000029960816,0.00045573845,0.09735127,0.00057804957,0.00024669163,0.73686713,0.115616344,0.039050605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062842366,0.00004560557,0.0344055,0.00050721545,0.00009309572,0.00020092897,0.10134317,0.0011145319,0.0005647042,0.05461561,0.8068175,0.00022928041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99702924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3505974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3505974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36287624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75321496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463088381","doi":"10.5539/ass.v12n7p17","title":"Courtship Initiation Behaviour in Online Personals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia","keywords":"Psychology; Courtship; Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Identity (music); Persona; Interpersonal relationship; Aesthetics; Computer science; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.034238041589419135,"score_gpt":0.3472489919984157,"score_spread":0.31301095040899657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2463088381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99540085,0.000042240707,0.00013051741,0.000023146195,0.000003333664,0.0000051369784,0.000024547386,0.0000040387763,0.004366226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977538,0.000048475264,0.00020417453,0.000021253936,0.000004441471,0.0000050194535,0.000026515003,0.000002999706,0.0019332711],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958485,0.0001898529,0.000020340318,0.000060350223,0.00010487482,0.000039709535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978389,0.0011823376,0.00048827604,0.00017848605,0.00018008932,0.00013185146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047229335,0.000098229895,0.00012253557,0.0005820337,0.0006097209,0.0009713443,0.00015452641,0.0003322943,0.003507211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034245164,0.00008773235,0.0000880851,0.00032305435,0.00063199014,0.00051880814,0.0004571684,0.00041561402,0.0003597171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004834136,0.00072788243,0.47789863,0.00035814135,0.00006789639,0.0034258356,0.3082351,0.00017778424,0.08267485,0.005066554,0.0018308981,0.119053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060086873,0.0004001641,0.89427185,0.00007830579,0.000030312614,0.0028117255,0.082163066,0.00069788797,0.008733961,0.000738031,0.010023614,0.000045022243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011149102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001874719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003507211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028182066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007663672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011732757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463162200","doi":"10.1057/9781403980595_7","title":"Representations of Crime","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); The arts; Presentation (obstetrics); Power (physics); Space (punctuation); Criminology; Painting; Visual arts; Sociology; History; Psychology; Art; Computer science; Communication","score_opus":0.030083141718046345,"score_gpt":0.29376306791833184,"score_spread":0.2636799262002855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2463162200","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031857162,0.0029158262,0.0016323813,0.0034443291,0.000405313,0.000017961896,0.000073948795,0.000028992778,0.9882957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42400303,0.008740469,0.0023369014,0.0023693722,0.00035410599,0.00013900772,0.0003419458,0.00014637179,0.56156874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999345,0.00031408062,0.000017086244,0.00006235278,0.00017330577,0.00008816395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996314,0.00012425789,0.000031721152,0.0000782454,0.00007956723,0.000054762888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005933979,0.000627229,0.00020543973,0.00195525,0.0031188622,0.006621729,0.0008031447,0.0012273694,0.015765142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017892256,0.00013984714,0.00020444665,0.0019727768,0.010375567,0.0041659633,0.0026576777,0.0022682208,0.0017596822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021476046,0.0000055781766,0.000075345604,0.000015813357,8.874505e-7,0.00003626216,0.0072053126,0.000069574526,0.000019484627,0.9586081,0.024324205,0.00963721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026807218,0.0000066418515,0.00044981364,0.00023190268,0.0000021956207,0.00021375738,0.012946248,0.00023843085,0.00007710471,0.18953195,0.7962919,0.000007286957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015318938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01885219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015765142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006104869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003053961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05273962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464581957","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2966","title":"Crime, Desire and Law’s Unconscious: Law, Literature and Culture, by David Gurnham","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Freudian slip; Narrative; Unconscious mind; Meaning (existential); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.012258080728428431,"score_gpt":0.2690070940564862,"score_spread":0.2567490133280578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464581957","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03289932,0.23965222,0.0017671663,0.57752913,0.0044107465,0.000015307915,0.000072740746,0.000051801613,0.1436016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8327352,0.07260118,0.001180673,0.05172599,0.004389218,0.000054961376,0.00004905744,0.000078373225,0.037185404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982838,0.001164715,0.00003709758,0.00011698955,0.00026231632,0.00013509275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985201,0.0010276135,0.00011328943,0.000070082395,0.00012402912,0.00014485366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018385769,0.0005594683,0.0002853239,0.0017881613,0.0062084133,0.008703832,0.0012616033,0.0035457686,0.0021454254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004686073,0.00024576235,0.0002128967,0.0023547737,0.029255787,0.010533106,0.0032313464,0.0042894236,0.00030373145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001817823,0.000031712254,0.00059257227,0.000082688224,0.000006393415,0.00016173611,0.055887625,0.00011798939,0.000091449525,0.849043,0.07889685,0.01506973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009410169,0.000020480911,0.0020880213,0.00069498294,0.000006726171,0.00031629487,0.067939214,0.00033504853,0.0001351944,0.49436006,0.4340615,0.000033081084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015524332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019191913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015524332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00510579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036082666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0370453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2464882502","doi":"10.1177/1743872116656777","title":"Sociological Aesthetics of Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Aesthetics; Sociological theory; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04097697863533825,"score_gpt":0.2739822557519672,"score_spread":0.23300527711662897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2464882502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016375687,0.0050568623,0.0628284,0.050714333,0.0012786526,0.00006349952,0.00007979268,0.00014251114,0.86346024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91738564,0.0030424427,0.021471528,0.00570547,0.0012569146,0.00020947737,0.0000830462,0.0001961205,0.0506494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928555,0.0042797965,0.00023712606,0.00048123862,0.0017478621,0.0003985028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963648,0.001680721,0.00038347888,0.0007156236,0.00059407967,0.000261283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058856118,0.00077523803,0.00044588608,0.003279535,0.00620541,0.009349629,0.0011880532,0.003359296,0.0073174387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00687873,0.0003550566,0.0008108419,0.001518091,0.06140856,0.007703356,0.0051627643,0.0047363937,0.001003379],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001034858,0.000002776008,0.00003718734,0.000009371618,8.6950115e-7,0.000016155407,0.0013163453,0.00008744674,0.000038655257,0.99632555,0.0008799637,0.0012846619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003550695,0.0000047862786,0.00011360951,0.000035685363,0.0000013736096,0.00006688409,0.0017731278,0.0002980701,0.000043494463,0.9433142,0.054339737,0.000005347954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021506106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020460598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009349629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005661838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032688938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04107976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465409642","doi":"","title":"Anne O'Keeffe, Investigating media discourse. London: Routledge. 2006.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language in Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Media studies; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021907905138619586,"score_gpt":0.3067282530516161,"score_spread":0.28482034791299654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465409642","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006089638,0.9188221,0.0019181917,0.05155288,0.0016355118,0.000023041832,0.0006197617,0.00006368203,0.024755834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023017557,0.91080225,0.004151958,0.010067445,0.0017456483,0.00013662304,0.00041200913,0.0002085324,0.04945804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774975,0.00083398295,0.00023332339,0.00025459164,0.0007024542,0.00022584996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99084395,0.006353219,0.00061491533,0.0003291182,0.0014597736,0.00039890964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034950469,0.0016099793,0.0012319044,0.00896902,0.004973866,0.0077824728,0.0021715558,0.007391516,0.02449625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008819613,0.0018323838,0.0006384456,0.009788345,0.008511106,0.030461228,0.0036488548,0.0046857125,0.009005901],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009600685,0.00004663773,0.00081127824,0.0022560472,0.000034793567,0.0004715471,0.014796543,0.00014863693,0.0003131556,0.08931569,0.7706075,0.12110221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000147511855,0.000011303159,0.0024195393,0.0039043943,0.000020055393,0.0004098042,0.007167395,0.000077606135,0.00043865267,0.06281623,0.9226838,0.000036552283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05988333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.118949175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05988333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040622842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069532483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11906952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2465461882","doi":"10.1177/1743872115627413","title":"Is Narrative Essential to the Law?: Precedent, Case Law and Judicial Emplotment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Storytelling; Narrative; Law; Invocation; Political science; Legal opinion; Legal realism; Focus (optics); Sociology; Judicial opinion; Legal profession; Black letter law; Public law; Philosophy; Private law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.025379670095579253,"score_gpt":0.289484105843372,"score_spread":0.26410443574779274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2465461882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4149321,0.020053675,0.02098844,0.10848118,0.00052093633,0.00006410762,0.000104042745,0.000051093943,0.43480438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99469525,0.0018901925,0.00094407616,0.00068889046,0.00006173828,0.000016092466,0.000013351905,0.000007051019,0.0016834841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944306,0.004590431,0.00014016121,0.00025895945,0.00028079885,0.00029900233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905413,0.006510659,0.0014263185,0.00044874343,0.00039596955,0.0006770843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045230845,0.0003158588,0.00036430152,0.0012367547,0.0039517703,0.01136097,0.0010332444,0.0021286032,0.0038849947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015975477,0.0003464489,0.0002397465,0.0013239508,0.045764755,0.015048338,0.004551555,0.002960093,0.00031711857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002225973,0.000023219836,0.001454021,0.00006891269,0.0000058472415,0.00022630235,0.061648734,0.00016438351,0.0000816806,0.9276261,0.000901434,0.007777104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003086408,0.000073000425,0.0044111637,0.00070159626,0.000018876066,0.0006143353,0.11689593,0.0010661592,0.0005125738,0.81335896,0.062272068,0.0000444003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005973913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00463298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01136097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038568873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027426106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027983785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469147301","doi":"10.1057/pol.2016.11","title":"Blind Injustice: Theorizing Anonymity and Accountability in Modern Democracies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polity","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Accountability; Political science; Solidarity; Politics; Sociology; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.03278350667362583,"score_gpt":0.3454120715391733,"score_spread":0.31262856486554746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469147301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20330112,0.0033222823,0.12760247,0.07451655,0.00032409624,0.000102906015,0.000052257266,0.00009895261,0.59067935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946806,0.00037451455,0.0017557152,0.000636804,0.00007437942,0.000033268403,0.000004699902,0.000012917418,0.0024272208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921232,0.0054665734,0.00019414749,0.0005439829,0.00095819455,0.0007137953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99018353,0.006832604,0.001157534,0.00091079617,0.0005707569,0.00034483458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008692607,0.00041961388,0.0003465847,0.0027662774,0.009091689,0.007995203,0.0012010965,0.00404732,0.0023439373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011004449,0.00031037428,0.0005286333,0.0017285123,0.062743686,0.0118799815,0.0055322233,0.004490435,0.0002480186],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027946483,0.000005607548,0.0003283449,0.000008652741,0.0000015411069,0.0000370977,0.009677335,0.00021571883,0.000026460018,0.9885357,0.00016440285,0.0009962321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055538812,0.0000071498403,0.00039521488,0.00005848419,0.000005062985,0.0000686404,0.005015854,0.0011898016,0.00011600462,0.98009884,0.013030679,0.000008756568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004287982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030886566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009091689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00754453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029107747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054739654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473005322","doi":"10.1177/1743872115625625","title":"Cross-cultural Conflict about Property Rights in Wild Animals in Australia: Law and Cinema","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Frontier; Indigenous; Movie theater; Cultural property; Context (archaeology); Relation (database); Property (philosophy); Law; Political science; Representation (politics); Property rights; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Geography; Politics; Philosophy; Cultural heritage; Art; Ecology; Literature","score_opus":0.04675926103567858,"score_gpt":0.31961539552746965,"score_spread":0.2728561344917911,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2473005322","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6682941,0.0053892294,0.0025106033,0.043659672,0.0004915696,0.00004590021,0.00003016707,0.00003789215,0.27954087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816341,0.0015329323,0.0004270099,0.0019850507,0.00014386489,0.00002815799,0.000007672973,0.000015320378,0.01422584],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986308,0.0008373573,0.000029773866,0.00011299382,0.00020575713,0.00018335461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965863,0.0025925862,0.00033485654,0.0001403301,0.00015473069,0.00019115074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002269188,0.00022635859,0.00021193505,0.0008632117,0.010306029,0.0053297174,0.0008029481,0.0034201466,0.0041490505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005577899,0.0002933997,0.00017122981,0.00069879723,0.016769042,0.0052675693,0.0047183065,0.004690385,0.00021712892],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016430451,0.000027829026,0.0012843437,0.000098615244,0.0000042034503,0.001414895,0.8766349,0.00005599258,0.0017706075,0.099434786,0.0054786354,0.013778707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007868981,0.000074837524,0.020253913,0.00064690795,0.000019290877,0.0015750492,0.580526,0.00047645107,0.0011012228,0.025791382,0.36947072,0.000056333665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017506128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034572877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017506128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028753963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001509783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034808457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474729996","doi":"10.1057/9780230522435_8","title":"Trial Discourse and Judicial Decision-Making: Constraining the Boundaries of Gendered Identities","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Performative utterance; Agency (philosophy); Normative; Subject (documents); Sociology; Constitution; Gender studies; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.029273737021085055,"score_gpt":0.30666236718100187,"score_spread":0.2773886301599168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474729996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15213338,0.0056830854,0.044237833,0.058200534,0.0006249585,0.00013102153,0.00008948963,0.00006529972,0.73883444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885616,0.000549779,0.00208102,0.0021671571,0.00016849049,0.00010650231,0.000020083997,0.000043291744,0.006302175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92779917,0.05219615,0.0020799874,0.005484685,0.007408712,0.005031326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9172147,0.06766685,0.004311634,0.0038756372,0.0045591625,0.0023720143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050995737,0.0005870098,0.001095999,0.002388403,0.015381255,0.02483147,0.0037002566,0.008477717,0.0062809195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08300765,0.00080603524,0.000726999,0.0019410896,0.073863894,0.01865244,0.015668979,0.008910878,0.0009016284],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021843933,0.000011190974,0.00028837362,0.000024810603,0.0000038326234,0.00010289595,0.025934655,0.00014046367,0.00011954389,0.9695338,0.0009781084,0.0028406042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056172747,0.000022003018,0.0005201458,0.00028191975,0.000013991493,0.00008015762,0.02213549,0.0007466251,0.0005878621,0.92244947,0.053070474,0.00003570901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01109983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009202477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050995737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011908197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013500568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26969445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476232167","doi":"10.29173/alr9","title":"Introduction (with reflection from Chief Justice Catherine Fraser)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reflection (computer programming); Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.014015926124757227,"score_gpt":0.2909030470595613,"score_spread":0.2768871209348041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476232167","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006984572,0.056810196,0.0020985724,0.4140692,0.28008038,0.00060513744,0.00901168,0.0011252941,0.23550111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0060325386,0.020682365,0.0013452373,0.18999508,0.055188768,0.0004629628,0.0020802403,0.0003581372,0.72385466],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982444,0.00023845518,0.00011928531,0.00022267373,0.0009445181,0.00023078787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908722,0.0026383456,0.00036351054,0.00036781305,0.0050293333,0.0007288798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002812189,0.0010055385,0.0010371183,0.003932457,0.0024783574,0.0037887732,0.0022419079,0.0054738647,0.15136549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011453756,0.0007745059,0.0010814227,0.0027796307,0.0015544617,0.0031490389,0.0021183053,0.0061861444,0.069822855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007999312,0.00000281123,0.000020015408,0.00007463881,0.0000013799478,0.000017928525,0.00002656579,0.0000142690915,0.000041092415,0.0011632369,0.9949096,0.0037204286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053821204,0.000005472192,0.00055192946,0.00021855425,0.0000043804844,0.000026836742,0.00006514438,0.00002088611,0.000061751445,0.00095642876,0.9980756,0.0000075667062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.075485185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13491437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15136549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050195116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057507455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50636804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477078631","doi":"10.5749/9780816674817-008","title":"6 Sufficient Virtue, Necessary Artistry","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Minnesota Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Communication; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01947148137498776,"score_gpt":0.21989923498862718,"score_spread":0.20042775361363943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477078631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017455333,0.0024906737,0.0008777913,0.004441224,0.00041340853,0.000014060675,0.000018750454,0.0000186402,0.98997986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3547847,0.005737587,0.0028010968,0.0051228446,0.0010854886,0.0001061807,0.000100148434,0.00012092806,0.63014114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893135,0.00040582765,0.00003168821,0.00014673831,0.0003189381,0.00016555603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929225,0.0002240731,0.000039039725,0.00014380312,0.00018393049,0.000116811025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012535206,0.0003693943,0.00030782758,0.00077742786,0.004617611,0.0064444738,0.00047335363,0.0012621888,0.017779406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019227858,0.00018474476,0.00022003223,0.00046535122,0.017104002,0.00437482,0.0027279465,0.0032427008,0.003098374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025726572,0.0000063080834,0.000046568126,0.000018199838,5.064887e-7,0.000020527186,0.0016193016,0.000027326741,0.000037551028,0.9793386,0.014372599,0.0045098937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051937595,0.000012768527,0.00025899484,0.00016934122,0.0000017010178,0.000092711634,0.0021560285,0.00009552097,0.0001173751,0.20975003,0.78733575,0.000004689616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048348513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008673259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017779406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041273227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037848193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059478045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480114406","doi":"10.1057/9780230503052_4","title":"Women and the Law: The White Devil and The Witch of Edmonton","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witch; Drama; Law; White (mutation); Scope (computer science); The Renaissance; History; Sociology; Political science; Art; Visual arts; Art history","score_opus":0.015862843647840977,"score_gpt":0.22524427225749238,"score_spread":0.20938142860965142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480114406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03536942,0.061145857,0.00042641163,0.0469161,0.0018130074,0.000027965623,0.000022237318,0.000024484882,0.8542545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28603864,0.011571389,0.00026016514,0.0074446816,0.0003315039,0.000031522988,0.000012633033,0.00003295412,0.6942765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941003,0.0001931829,0.000007631857,0.000058699065,0.00015305025,0.00017741058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975485,0.00011858067,0.000018516685,0.000014131221,0.00002463189,0.00006924622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009821132,0.0005073248,0.00026245794,0.0008570207,0.012198872,0.0055080173,0.00071105955,0.0022111696,0.009238942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00106767,0.00030451603,0.00015656289,0.0006189959,0.01665825,0.0027738288,0.003865063,0.0033016503,0.00065351126],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014127041,0.00003556364,0.00040561438,0.00006205024,0.000004081482,0.00056218816,0.110316955,0.000052160725,0.00013866206,0.7785822,0.07554181,0.034284562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006481052,0.000017694038,0.0011920395,0.0004503421,0.000004265154,0.00023968352,0.0459325,0.000034798974,0.00011716374,0.043120615,0.9088724,0.000011885664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13110426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36083087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13110426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006848826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00512256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26068228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480772938","doi":"10.1017/ccol0521770440.012","title":"Matters of state","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tempest; Comedy; Politics; MAGIC (telescope); Guard (computer science); Arbitrariness; State (computer science); Law; Shadow (psychology); Economic Justice; History; Literature; Art; Philosophy; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.021210353760129443,"score_gpt":0.2187182181401388,"score_spread":0.19750786438000936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480772938","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033410036,0.0030349365,0.002503745,0.018858625,0.0011538615,0.000040550785,0.00014264269,0.000048548583,0.97087604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4632788,0.0039347685,0.001510763,0.023949651,0.0025972344,0.00020056382,0.00033492144,0.00023223383,0.503961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99329776,0.0020155138,0.0003237357,0.0014101102,0.0016238814,0.001329063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970968,0.00092895626,0.00022951502,0.00072509644,0.0006584993,0.00036120284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037302882,0.00057560555,0.00057997147,0.0013774235,0.009300008,0.014516596,0.0012452239,0.0048408704,0.044352684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009436754,0.00032846714,0.00062943244,0.0014964517,0.019511223,0.011011613,0.008492656,0.0061749145,0.00775353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041031453,0.0000038053715,0.00009479106,0.000011971901,0.0000016998625,0.000018121253,0.0012793525,0.000017992532,0.00002304229,0.9800062,0.014878089,0.0036607755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059213003,0.000014290905,0.00045980496,0.00015090297,0.000005512084,0.00009684454,0.0021310982,0.000082285245,0.00009475544,0.30605292,0.69089353,0.000012191666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074949046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008082058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044352684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074626626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007015834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1483745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2480976281","doi":"10.1057/9781137550989_15","title":"Sex-Themed Visual Imagery, Freedom of Expression, and Women’s Rights","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Globe; Art history; Media studies; History; Art; Visual arts; Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.012146940602440363,"score_gpt":0.2548490801459051,"score_spread":0.24270213954346476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2480976281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22047506,0.0054325233,0.0015691285,0.01914492,0.0004482945,0.000019683224,0.000103237224,0.000039987048,0.75276715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97601366,0.00085457746,0.00017699397,0.0007318283,0.000059202728,0.000011865707,0.000021281721,0.000031847812,0.02209884],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849105,0.00088405935,0.000021981343,0.000095403324,0.00018870538,0.000318737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988589,0.00048503443,0.0001570949,0.00013425408,0.00008969574,0.00027501473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018022646,0.0002393772,0.00016547533,0.00089507224,0.0075636595,0.009121004,0.00047930935,0.0009162032,0.012171265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032483276,0.00014448895,0.00014231727,0.0006893537,0.030936694,0.0033071216,0.00498135,0.0015472355,0.00054071745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079675694,0.000032522938,0.0038720048,0.00011245401,0.000009181375,0.00033544976,0.64305896,0.00007161412,0.000634211,0.29711697,0.021647384,0.033029612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020202799,0.000029826097,0.007973893,0.0004734792,0.00000908878,0.00038520814,0.54513663,0.00008464928,0.00040790872,0.042191915,0.40325573,0.000031494827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036190413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06406889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036190413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038930175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002314918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071959555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481696470","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511779640.003","title":"The power of persons unknown","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.016973020470113127,"score_gpt":0.21887982420088464,"score_spread":0.20190680373077152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481696470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008532413,0.004555005,0.0044669276,0.011458668,0.00054030033,0.000020131867,0.000029044764,0.000040320934,0.9703571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60608184,0.0052803936,0.0013406447,0.007796737,0.0008848592,0.00008222533,0.000048811577,0.00012619774,0.37835824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951029,0.0027051438,0.00010859548,0.00066496857,0.00079257134,0.00062585156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682486,0.0017277093,0.0001922625,0.0006049877,0.0003469429,0.00030316558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037894768,0.00050969963,0.0004766186,0.0010496791,0.010180945,0.009753511,0.0009929768,0.002561402,0.013250313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062367595,0.00032617198,0.00040676302,0.00074472517,0.038965374,0.012043375,0.0061844117,0.005299504,0.0033465775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070060473,0.000007543393,0.000112032736,0.000023974886,0.0000023328325,0.00009891458,0.019092133,0.000030616597,0.00007169466,0.9639563,0.00907409,0.0075233555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009504985,0.000019872115,0.00023335569,0.0002444341,0.000009603004,0.00025897977,0.011728173,0.00012779608,0.0002945521,0.21654694,0.7705118,0.000014974133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006670938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067437184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013250313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036181356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030115687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044326723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2482986303","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548781.003.0026","title":"‘On the Internet, Nobody Knows You're a Nazi’: Some Comparative Legal Aspects of Holocaust Denial on the <i>WWW</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; nobody; The Holocaust; Phenomenon; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Law; Normative; Politics; Sociology; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer security; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.04465932935595098,"score_gpt":0.2957213637379319,"score_spread":0.25106203438198094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2482986303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14501148,0.0048675532,0.0015326906,0.016165605,0.00018524795,0.000027467011,0.000021088748,0.000012948415,0.83217585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806698,0.001831436,0.00021624097,0.0014696218,0.00007394989,0.00002518467,0.000011389671,0.000016064907,0.015686247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995994,0.002752748,0.00004845562,0.00014827588,0.00065417704,0.0004023317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951998,0.0036877564,0.00027332167,0.00020772146,0.0004636787,0.00016770314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032401017,0.000179829,0.00031190788,0.0018237351,0.010112749,0.0077301413,0.0011664951,0.0025357793,0.004796635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005827386,0.00020403479,0.00018933773,0.002108936,0.043007992,0.0066510383,0.0033053192,0.0039331275,0.00024857587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075692064,0.000014474706,0.0002316269,0.000034773686,0.0000016863223,0.00021784352,0.13525723,0.000041420153,0.0000846368,0.858719,0.0021719495,0.003217749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002007865,0.00003520158,0.0077524832,0.0007536945,0.000016130127,0.00056402484,0.45863166,0.00046415796,0.0006762413,0.16118707,0.3698672,0.00003203499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06549393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07575385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06549393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013658006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003985549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13022542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2490149766","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-947-2.ch270","title":"E-Government as a New Frontier for Legal Theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Electronic Government","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Public relations; Open government; Publication; Information and Communications Technology; Frontier; Political science; Business; Transparency (behavior); Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.008386634321915155,"score_gpt":0.23437219865431327,"score_spread":0.2259855643323981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2490149766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017091394,0.058115784,0.009376728,0.049942467,0.0020819106,0.000026120159,0.00004814263,0.000085137115,0.8786146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14166902,0.109509684,0.022276646,0.028477795,0.0054041715,0.00019481298,0.00021936023,0.00023313814,0.69201547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912983,0.0003431418,0.00003063701,0.00008257174,0.00033933573,0.00007458875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871194,0.0008815992,0.00004438651,0.000112660164,0.00017437786,0.00007494907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011492895,0.00040130978,0.0003751461,0.001380955,0.0025456343,0.0067386134,0.00074406795,0.003655938,0.011009463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017456706,0.00024097237,0.00037359842,0.001717687,0.011390496,0.011006468,0.0018792661,0.006408674,0.0029626808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.991513e-7,0.000004450084,0.000010835698,0.000020293039,3.936723e-7,0.000011189003,0.0002957381,0.00008202434,0.000016538766,0.9770926,0.015752794,0.006712526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020165076,0.0000029571595,0.00003733655,0.00021763884,8.636986e-7,0.00004154633,0.00034026618,0.00022193762,0.00004137173,0.55720836,0.44188216,0.0000034941952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029754287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046267807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011009463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053856764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047876635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03907603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492403657","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900005774","title":"Hate Speech and Pornography in Canada: A Qualified Deontological Response to a Consequentialist Argument","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Consequentialism; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Pornography; Normative; Sociology; Law; Deontological ethics; Democracy; Identity (music); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Medicine","score_opus":0.02420541552427644,"score_gpt":0.30195516973519826,"score_spread":0.2777497542109218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492403657","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19094414,0.0026862496,0.004847195,0.28495905,0.000933088,0.000092204355,0.000186297,0.00006261061,0.5152892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92615783,0.00096563436,0.0007494787,0.029177995,0.00013714378,0.00001999521,0.000031920335,0.00003212112,0.042727966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938216,0.00097414985,0.00009852771,0.00054288935,0.0021110994,0.0024516368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942405,0.0016954837,0.00032050055,0.00021405211,0.0026119782,0.00091747625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036073478,0.00042151383,0.000420648,0.0012786802,0.04423438,0.008339622,0.0022150741,0.008255006,0.0058433115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010261369,0.00041774323,0.0004450892,0.0017647579,0.021682302,0.0030070436,0.0044163084,0.010874559,0.00023886422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029347966,0.000026120377,0.0023059596,0.000040967476,0.000015132186,0.0006373019,0.061456114,0.00028973777,0.0003801386,0.8962025,0.030255342,0.008361419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007749297,0.00004343021,0.022831313,0.0002989192,0.000105790816,0.00038523908,0.14363371,0.002271828,0.0014297698,0.19358325,0.6350529,0.00028633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99026793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10990708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10990708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14667241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7974354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493769224","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511712043.002","title":"Life plus ninety-nine years: the fantasy of legal fictions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Fantasy; Art; Psychoanalysis; Literature; Art history; Psychology","score_opus":0.020602944930785672,"score_gpt":0.22328557242124913,"score_spread":0.20268262749046345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493769224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029816445,0.017609978,0.0014341788,0.10351401,0.004009445,0.000012634537,0.00008743625,0.000061076906,0.84345496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79749393,0.005267193,0.0006470934,0.02125471,0.0013512004,0.00005361641,0.000067677,0.000091551774,0.17377311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862325,0.0007502183,0.000024058965,0.00008236099,0.00031930592,0.00020080339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998629,0.00064517994,0.000118729746,0.00007158841,0.00015390888,0.00038165651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017683569,0.00040500835,0.00023954864,0.00080586283,0.010572704,0.0066439854,0.000802029,0.0024896956,0.006701704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047314377,0.0002005143,0.00021443563,0.00047150708,0.019362878,0.005672965,0.004349496,0.007759806,0.0016488526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000308975,0.000022422591,0.0002344465,0.00003035727,0.000003889553,0.0006100312,0.06835105,0.00006193456,0.00015206121,0.80811507,0.110348195,0.012039649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006416077,0.000021884454,0.00034280124,0.00016359864,0.0000029234923,0.00058454124,0.030180769,0.00006662569,0.00010618555,0.052587364,0.9159183,0.000018569217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004373823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0084727835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010572704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030365558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012952047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022419453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2495541515","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511818783.010","title":"The formation of legal schools","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.018826267121165138,"score_gpt":0.21907693616093193,"score_spread":0.2002506690397668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2495541515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025051644,0.0015982966,0.00652369,0.009479257,0.0001791826,0.00007521848,0.000040000188,0.00006938497,0.95698327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8560235,0.0013035686,0.0050045815,0.0016170763,0.0002111924,0.00011774307,0.00006870191,0.00005741809,0.13559617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804014,0.0007405795,0.00005373639,0.00032289408,0.00040173513,0.0004408456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998171,0.00056170643,0.00023914565,0.00023644476,0.000382331,0.00040935772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020849511,0.0002153096,0.00030878227,0.0015496255,0.006004967,0.0076837093,0.0007267368,0.0020221178,0.010710998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004093243,0.00035180885,0.00023250187,0.0012173031,0.021389041,0.008440457,0.005835121,0.00531222,0.0018647629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014353502,0.0000070975852,0.0001349367,0.0000064335354,3.1330381e-7,0.000007923125,0.0024442107,0.000026024678,0.000024562434,0.9917997,0.0014842047,0.0040632263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013955223,0.000020301419,0.0012335018,0.00016043709,0.000003357738,0.000052631865,0.004305273,0.000352549,0.00025291092,0.68527436,0.30832124,0.00000952142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005133885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008045409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010710998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069552115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007714762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050463796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496032426","doi":"","title":"Justice Defiled: Perverts, Potheads, Serial Killers and Lawyers","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Economic Justice; Law; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.04368018531065314,"score_gpt":0.3349392624279341,"score_spread":0.29125907711728094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496032426","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029702878,0.94596845,0.000095127776,0.033239722,0.0037085866,0.0000055622245,0.00002931921,0.000010392555,0.016645826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018978523,0.8422612,0.00030366034,0.025476912,0.008595307,0.0000376384,0.00011595479,0.000036582678,0.10419428],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991296,0.00025919743,0.000047369587,0.00009741787,0.00036990203,0.00009642102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847907,0.0007318143,0.00016801106,0.000032624117,0.0004390103,0.00014947602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009777755,0.0007107601,0.0007868204,0.0027853295,0.0022298214,0.0052970257,0.0011401919,0.0033650035,0.010483283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033423922,0.00047137588,0.00023142723,0.004182282,0.0035203625,0.0058064614,0.0013378622,0.0033637001,0.0023356904],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001357046,0.0000149376165,0.00015640097,0.00053022656,0.0000067599276,0.00008145305,0.0013252663,0.00006533126,0.000041907173,0.026203675,0.91762865,0.05393175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060852194,0.0000088675715,0.0006251681,0.0012979764,0.0000071764475,0.0001282605,0.0012885131,0.000017792667,0.00002473624,0.008874429,0.9877142,0.0000067307788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042643238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09167721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042643238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004777049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009541853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08479005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498646203","doi":"10.29173/alr379","title":"Public Video Surveillance by the State: Policy, Privacy Legislation, and the Charter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Legislation; Legislature; Jurisprudence; Law; Law enforcement; Supreme court; Legislative history; State (computer science); Political science; Enforcement; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.042120292497949956,"score_gpt":0.30846483529460317,"score_spread":0.2663445427966532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498646203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05746775,0.112744845,0.004153565,0.3974616,0.0011574418,0.00009868466,0.00024422543,0.00010844201,0.42656344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8599543,0.05736043,0.0025482795,0.035309132,0.0010631875,0.00009518525,0.0001404961,0.000045304816,0.04348375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99304056,0.0025778038,0.0001951529,0.0005711992,0.002541175,0.0010740609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877564,0.0076159886,0.0012350668,0.00042923322,0.0023818822,0.0005814527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0079925675,0.00020316722,0.00033062836,0.0023405633,0.0068321195,0.012267681,0.0016151038,0.0046411124,0.003743334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014577996,0.00037174337,0.00026186355,0.003303482,0.017450497,0.0042918907,0.0017771136,0.0047815014,0.000283459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011695851,0.00003420486,0.0016916242,0.00009185999,0.000004399677,0.00008048416,0.0035406281,0.00032695374,0.00013513918,0.93886244,0.022896746,0.032323826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034163117,0.00007894867,0.02432252,0.0021002153,0.000065840955,0.000169621,0.013408589,0.0011952706,0.0008427968,0.15993811,0.7977357,0.00010825731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70482886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6953068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70482886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04066491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06821318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5938189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502463428","doi":"10.1007/978-1-137-08450-7_12","title":"The Ideas of Infinity and Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Faith; Infinity; Law; History; Philosophy; Epistemology; Political science; Mathematics; Archaeology; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.0239623374903869,"score_gpt":0.2555146150264073,"score_spread":0.23155227753602042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502463428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046487893,0.028315863,0.022194859,0.021947168,0.00096939085,0.000021189402,0.00007134658,0.00012832359,0.921703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60576475,0.023996586,0.016277736,0.0084277885,0.0027480768,0.00021904353,0.0001233978,0.00026080274,0.34218183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998582,0.00080166134,0.00003603355,0.00016468982,0.0002971782,0.00011849973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985784,0.00084319315,0.00008485757,0.00023223972,0.0001412967,0.000119954704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001771436,0.00056690164,0.0004090581,0.0013754311,0.0031957226,0.007256272,0.00080259354,0.0019172016,0.008816199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033857299,0.00021361609,0.00047257528,0.0010642299,0.028675457,0.009243181,0.0022186665,0.0041166195,0.0019812426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014047886,0.000001321697,0.000016049302,0.000006653701,4.9610264e-7,0.0000065720765,0.0005806487,0.0000386857,0.0000109308,0.994344,0.0029650666,0.0020282844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002488351,0.0000036141262,0.000054539345,0.000045074004,8.163708e-7,0.000027486869,0.00041693286,0.00012510282,0.000026401462,0.91869825,0.08059655,0.000002733208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025224437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025682615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008816199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040096114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022750632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029493153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2502850426","doi":"10.1017/s0841820900002290","title":"Property as Ontology: On Aboriginal and English Understandings of Ownership","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Epistemology; Relation (database); Categorization; Determinative; Embodied cognition; Sociology; Ontology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.022132277319380663,"score_gpt":0.2966466945513993,"score_spread":0.27451441723201864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2502850426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34521848,0.01619542,0.014532616,0.032574195,0.0003245242,0.00006122663,0.000121906356,0.00004291994,0.5909288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856656,0.0020213395,0.0012298813,0.00077238266,0.000052407686,0.000027005299,0.000022562353,0.000029800773,0.01017893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975204,0.0011646404,0.000080434096,0.00021123486,0.00046287818,0.0005604433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975981,0.0013021562,0.00022872622,0.0001928141,0.00045230472,0.00022590696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037296538,0.00039124113,0.00051359873,0.0021870534,0.009308653,0.0071881847,0.0014903878,0.0016980747,0.0026198057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003407611,0.00029176395,0.0004965341,0.0019487239,0.037982117,0.010183827,0.0053166063,0.0033248588,0.00018781265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016147225,0.000009553939,0.00067441893,0.00004826646,0.0000037399745,0.0002277496,0.27550495,0.00008251526,0.00018738762,0.7202432,0.000554129,0.002447946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025704114,0.000055699293,0.006568591,0.00063481054,0.000057653357,0.0006470422,0.37098604,0.0012137876,0.00056859537,0.44904858,0.17013822,0.000055396224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39939833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3111907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6006017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017420042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007055573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79414713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503688754","doi":"10.29173/alr185","title":"Calm Like a Bomb: An Assessment of the Partial Defence of Provocation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Provocation test; Doctrine; Presupposition; Position (finance); Software deployment; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Medicine; Business; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.021339562822200512,"score_gpt":0.37193790448335595,"score_spread":0.35059834166115544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503688754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109341234,0.026218534,0.012818246,0.07767078,0.0011031041,0.0003070606,0.00007331817,0.000056624292,0.77241105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97438985,0.005077321,0.001439171,0.0092365295,0.00035429207,0.00009984551,0.000028806364,0.000026669697,0.009347608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9696294,0.018850267,0.000903855,0.0012662562,0.00715369,0.0021965313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.941149,0.04068111,0.0039412174,0.0029007357,0.010081476,0.0012464029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022594618,0.00048039955,0.0009919457,0.0030594799,0.005401359,0.009316305,0.0040427903,0.008337892,0.0062403125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06403693,0.00043320368,0.0010781181,0.0027556182,0.02921064,0.008238727,0.0073699965,0.006213491,0.0005520549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045844026,0.000019592171,0.0015175181,0.0002460191,0.000030046613,0.000170646,0.0054020635,0.00044299112,0.00012935643,0.9651943,0.004436938,0.022364702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117147945,0.0008261487,0.01657697,0.0031786754,0.00030740496,0.0015142479,0.06222877,0.0037138849,0.001051529,0.5919691,0.31835228,0.00016383192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011688349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01650213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022594618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008830758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009092648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11949319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504271130","doi":"","title":"The Supreme Court of Canada, Brick by Brick","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Brick; Law; Wife; Economic Justice; Political science; Engineering; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.006203155911906577,"score_gpt":0.2375272767976175,"score_spread":0.23132412088571094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504271130","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010806326,0.031024914,0.001000266,0.5961927,0.0064562354,0.000041943065,0.0010342869,0.00009107061,0.35335234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2820818,0.011612774,0.0013223268,0.1433166,0.0009986112,0.0000463422,0.00033837586,0.00022652373,0.5600567],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699926,0.0003963881,0.000051888794,0.00039706985,0.0011372197,0.0010182036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974679,0.0003360311,0.00005340531,0.000063902924,0.0014148599,0.0006639022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014290737,0.0004624541,0.00046827874,0.0010425533,0.03595632,0.013008951,0.0014643025,0.0070823412,0.017861206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007131936,0.00054614973,0.00035877732,0.0018807576,0.00917755,0.004213567,0.002037091,0.009115152,0.0016404314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016266957,0.000006143603,0.00060096435,0.000026132024,0.0000089032,0.00016621817,0.00333313,0.00012799834,0.00011392663,0.19492717,0.79330754,0.0073655606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071844747,0.0000031935047,0.0013534613,0.00012333893,0.000010153854,0.000036383375,0.0054602786,0.000094465206,0.00011190773,0.012704122,0.9800653,0.000030223835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98600674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99593544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09159235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09159235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12378508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6645521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2504640928","doi":"10.1017/ccol9780521860543.014","title":"The drama of rhetoric at Rome","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Sincerity; Drama; Aesthetics; Accident (philosophy); Art; Sociology; Literature; Psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01926670536682043,"score_gpt":0.21834346114845316,"score_spread":0.19907675578163272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2504640928","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017595645,0.005114383,0.00051295274,0.0042283144,0.00056236,0.000005968329,0.000021094746,0.000059340353,0.9877359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2175067,0.0060698036,0.0012792721,0.002556493,0.0006934611,0.00004169553,0.000102659316,0.00019179579,0.7715581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994423,0.00024724728,0.000009467415,0.000061733175,0.00014316934,0.000096119715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998266,0.00007889405,0.000015285297,0.00002066616,0.000020992487,0.000037626094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040625772,0.0005832499,0.0002939325,0.0009822017,0.005668285,0.0044247657,0.00064640166,0.0014537409,0.015815658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009958313,0.00022904393,0.00027122573,0.00082144333,0.007170446,0.0025366142,0.0017925698,0.0031998327,0.0039719716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026607111,0.000019372545,0.00010677531,0.00010292728,0.0000031411937,0.0002527245,0.014382146,0.00017456104,0.00037654227,0.7901184,0.16918859,0.025248202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035723358,0.0000073903707,0.00021084945,0.0001633086,0.0000019488932,0.00018245359,0.002733332,0.000073854855,0.00013853345,0.013097442,0.9833815,0.0000057611182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050076344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0113707585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015815658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004323401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015619849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0529086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507614432","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Delgamuukw: The Supreme Court of Canada Decision on Aboriginal Title","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.012886071701483271,"score_gpt":0.2732902568250392,"score_spread":0.26040418512355595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507614432","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037207722,0.5354922,0.00030119767,0.16918376,0.055584747,0.00012425262,0.0015159243,0.0001322129,0.23729363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070599555,0.28646195,0.00040695502,0.08640548,0.019445322,0.0001358436,0.0012200195,0.00018472667,0.5986798],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977229,0.00018008231,0.00006010279,0.00014974778,0.0016546831,0.00023255139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941174,0.0011029788,0.00018373603,0.000112285066,0.004106496,0.00037708817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012974297,0.0008180852,0.0012269679,0.0036171474,0.005397577,0.005625158,0.0023956238,0.005011975,0.043391522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007367754,0.0005938627,0.0005089234,0.006523986,0.002312919,0.0020443578,0.0011179998,0.004660203,0.012383831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012675032,8.014171e-7,0.000012582446,0.000039384533,9.4731917e-7,0.0000064969945,0.000016737802,0.000011722673,0.000004433558,0.0008536007,0.9951074,0.0039446293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023122184,0.0000016384519,0.00024602667,0.00043213877,0.0000043962636,0.000022895505,0.000059103244,0.0000132561345,0.000012405252,0.0004918535,0.9987072,0.000006873422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7264375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88097197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2735625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0275621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051532865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5503471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509967429","doi":"","title":"Holmes's 'Path of the Law' as Non-Analytic Jurisprudence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Nothing; Historiography; Law; Narrative; Philosophy; Reading (process); Philosophy of law; History; Literature; Sociology; Epistemology; Comparative law; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.012505530639213246,"score_gpt":0.27889380038620826,"score_spread":0.26638826974699503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509967429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06987621,0.018592572,0.049816374,0.3923617,0.0029736361,0.00005525403,0.00008524125,0.0001369819,0.46610197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9587312,0.0023054176,0.004752617,0.009626233,0.0006823379,0.00004655153,0.000019629912,0.00006148625,0.02377454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955863,0.0025079243,0.00013271082,0.0005227512,0.0009535507,0.00029683448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910869,0.006675767,0.0005639973,0.0006140938,0.0007519899,0.0003071885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004576994,0.00024484086,0.00029578278,0.001173602,0.004088153,0.0077556507,0.0010920417,0.0040869378,0.001496865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011827145,0.0002053381,0.00020998837,0.00085363764,0.04260762,0.007883641,0.0026807727,0.005418678,0.0002928899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030252472,0.0000035043583,0.000066512104,0.000015132412,7.1960574e-7,0.000018647848,0.003417899,0.00003975253,0.000025338468,0.9921795,0.0020829258,0.0021469246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000780148,0.000012611373,0.00023128705,0.00008445259,0.0000024692047,0.000069809576,0.002385696,0.00041564563,0.00019380363,0.91437304,0.08221525,0.0000081882245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033938515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003491692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077556507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054095984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050327242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03924954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2510944375","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12188","title":"<i>The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography</i> . By Irus Braverman, Nicholas Blomley, David Delaney, and Alexandre Kedar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2014. 296 pp. $27.95 paper.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Law; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.010398050899400952,"score_gpt":0.25497854359536387,"score_spread":0.2445804926959629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2510944375","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001597773,0.5712345,0.0005208723,0.3684185,0.033378426,0.000022072796,0.0003349863,0.00008412849,0.025846738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013610679,0.6890263,0.0016969385,0.088463545,0.07833178,0.0001299588,0.0009985453,0.00029099386,0.1274512],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796957,0.00057014375,0.00010603773,0.00023366342,0.0009050585,0.00021551042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99483335,0.0021584774,0.0005984771,0.000255218,0.001276958,0.00087755796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027537802,0.001141283,0.0009835843,0.004217374,0.0023786917,0.00802899,0.0016074666,0.0048349886,0.03595004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071169324,0.00089973275,0.00077553844,0.006584458,0.005238295,0.018725881,0.005291848,0.006566831,0.012794161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028145232,0.0000023722596,0.00003525996,0.0001337079,0.0000027375097,0.000009412152,0.000078487166,0.000014400405,0.000020932674,0.004875376,0.9817178,0.013106745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024964768,0.000005132854,0.00034040626,0.0006152917,0.000002854818,0.000028098519,0.00033149362,0.000017801565,0.000020689246,0.0079174265,0.9907126,0.000005873671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038773578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03595004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004955464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063034203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12026483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512277447","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0164324","title":"Perceived Masculinity Predicts U.S. Supreme Court Outcomes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Connaught Fund; University of Chicago; European Research Council; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Supreme court; Masculinity; Psychology; Social psychology; Precedent; Attractiveness; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.05841577893103521,"score_gpt":0.2731682452835284,"score_spread":0.21475246635249318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512277447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99879515,0.000030890453,0.000015314357,0.000043411146,0.0000025946922,0.0000018614497,0.000019730429,8.6220894e-7,0.0010901662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99968743,0.000026035683,0.000016044554,0.000010458339,0.00000312909,0.0000011289126,0.00002182719,5.485168e-7,0.00023347618],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969816,0.00010257785,0.000020947795,0.000042221825,0.00008342129,0.000052638145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959318,0.00082886923,0.001992078,0.00012592493,0.00031677698,0.000804627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089613587,0.00017966804,0.00011390126,0.0006714989,0.00063170417,0.0009248318,0.00011968471,0.0003198875,0.004137128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053878706,0.0000970172,0.0001365554,0.00031285494,0.00034994484,0.00028632153,0.00050079037,0.00044034782,0.0004150793],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028483566,0.00006260952,0.99545705,0.000004145514,0.000018691668,0.0000916736,0.0008600156,0.000041366424,0.0003498649,0.00011222576,0.00012827004,0.002845612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.750333e-7,0.00003872088,0.9988348,0.000004867186,0.0000043512746,0.000050915205,0.0006987225,0.000113334,0.00007766685,0.000055719418,0.0001172541,0.000002701355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004202262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013876974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004202262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022607303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020973907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013840079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512509702","doi":"10.1057/978-1-137-47835-1_3","title":"Defilement and Social Theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Symbol (formal); Reading (process); Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Politics; Disgust; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Social psychology; Psychology; Linguistics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021478833777561095,"score_gpt":0.26043746254493827,"score_spread":0.23895862876737717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512509702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027262514,0.01210932,0.010030634,0.031948693,0.000533498,0.00003936659,0.000035838188,0.000047670208,0.9179925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559051,0.004534918,0.0017590738,0.0028245961,0.00036567508,0.00008984418,0.00004260289,0.00003676166,0.034441452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960108,0.00250681,0.000076364304,0.00049907103,0.00045820134,0.0004487443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849343,0.0009277988,0.00013603682,0.00016041043,0.00013375162,0.00014848335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029454792,0.00082811585,0.00052656035,0.002094233,0.0080470955,0.007313955,0.001280134,0.0031558028,0.0071472437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027055587,0.00017807627,0.00038754093,0.0018201537,0.077115685,0.006130958,0.005108821,0.0035222701,0.00078137196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010494708,0.0000040723035,0.000037151895,0.0000108086415,8.742239e-7,0.000020666923,0.0032669012,0.000058240366,0.000009805799,0.9948036,0.000715632,0.0010711702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004456409,0.0000083842,0.00012184015,0.000072421666,0.0000013563014,0.000045056317,0.0048319506,0.00014921479,0.000026471536,0.9313186,0.063415796,0.0000044037047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047323043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028227726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008996131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008996131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026099451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065271795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512817360","doi":"10.1086/379907","title":"Book ReviewsOtfried.  Höffe, <i>Categorical Principles of Law: A Counterpoint to Modernity</i>. Translated by Mark Migotti, with a foreword by Kenneth Baynes.University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002. Pp. 311. $26.50 (paper).","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Counterpoint; Reprint; Modernity; State (computer science); Permission; Download; Sociology; Art history; Media studies; Library science; Law; History; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02479086253973759,"score_gpt":0.2574473436432803,"score_spread":0.23265648110354273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512817360","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037548086,0.77002585,0.0012183343,0.037417177,0.011926779,0.000040983523,0.0016647545,0.00017532783,0.17715529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004269083,0.58252263,0.0016320733,0.016932156,0.00846453,0.00006241876,0.0020266068,0.00032132835,0.38376907],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942243,0.00006594033,0.000030412595,0.00008765851,0.00034982126,0.00004379589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885595,0.00047832177,0.00007955032,0.000039084283,0.00048009018,0.00006696605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050685863,0.0010524512,0.00094510295,0.003930194,0.0009226793,0.0024349936,0.0011307002,0.001759446,0.10825729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024864445,0.00057170703,0.000538978,0.0056134714,0.0009452133,0.0037428217,0.00091511494,0.0022043663,0.054464135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008152294,0.000011906875,0.000042877407,0.00047724257,0.000004329407,0.00003175851,0.00010778197,0.000045727633,0.00009870493,0.006869328,0.9370971,0.05520517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020838195,0.0000032032826,0.00017720177,0.00035097013,0.0000026830771,0.00008895678,0.00003866405,0.0000117987975,0.000040066414,0.0021632854,0.9971168,0.000004260001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009347493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021168232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10825729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020195434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001989579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36215675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518817499","doi":"10.1177/0090591716630745","title":"Book Review: <i>Forgotten Justice. The Forms of Justice in the History of Legal and Political Theory</i> , by Allan Beever","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Theory","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Politics; Law; Political philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics","score_opus":0.012474257656425293,"score_gpt":0.28665668624811036,"score_spread":0.27418242859168507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518817499","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000641527,0.7223436,0.00026223835,0.14784737,0.10603228,0.000024786057,0.00025202226,0.000039729555,0.023133857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020101306,0.5973019,0.00049236295,0.17888229,0.10018476,0.00010494956,0.00037385302,0.00014151291,0.1205083],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982613,0.00035158667,0.000100863064,0.00019125192,0.0009813333,0.0001136615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929739,0.0040102173,0.00042800148,0.0001676923,0.0019477188,0.0004724976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016301473,0.0011226154,0.001727087,0.0033567653,0.0017741346,0.006402723,0.0019970625,0.0057807397,0.023090674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00955032,0.00068655936,0.00085304526,0.0054304423,0.0035986789,0.0052635856,0.0018587498,0.0091838995,0.014721149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025022453,0.000002706264,0.000011421495,0.00020637081,0.000002831613,0.0000056209533,0.000018929279,0.00000957357,0.000010439434,0.0018837822,0.9880981,0.009747653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004566264,0.0000038866715,0.000103029684,0.000971933,0.000006005139,0.000060240818,0.00003859481,0.000011931841,0.000016299813,0.0027182242,0.9960586,0.0000066788284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014522341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042552985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023090674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004876063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008491549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07724595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520345059","doi":"10.4000/ethiquepublique.2516","title":"Un essai de conciliation de valeurs : la régulation judiciaire du discours obscène ou haineux","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Éthique Publique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.013755479650353883,"score_gpt":0.2764219866035969,"score_spread":0.262666506953243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520345059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15144852,0.016381431,0.041035656,0.31252378,0.0013097681,0.00009249126,0.00012349838,0.00012883458,0.47695595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541693,0.0024716158,0.0039712633,0.008596974,0.0002750782,0.00006485235,0.000021601485,0.00006136034,0.030368134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897097,0.00479642,0.00022812463,0.0011386984,0.0029522902,0.0011747573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886785,0.005209653,0.0010919928,0.0013382898,0.0026805683,0.0010009462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009183739,0.0004118687,0.00058732374,0.0012570436,0.008327828,0.008289423,0.001501562,0.0042475164,0.005194178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019238178,0.00032884846,0.00042968642,0.001178905,0.04279431,0.004835914,0.0047204946,0.0065631922,0.00048702053],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004580685,0.000019315838,0.001673492,0.00007024825,0.00001924903,0.000077395576,0.025338087,0.00025147918,0.0007737366,0.950188,0.005136645,0.01640666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009749199,0.00012978673,0.015839921,0.000978138,0.000087873384,0.00019426705,0.032922156,0.00132881,0.0034766134,0.523959,0.42085648,0.00012955893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14564173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1757555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14564173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014692674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025000164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28958803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521607471","doi":"","title":"Comment on R v H(S): Automatism and Evidential Burdens","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Automatism (medicine); Aside; Appeal; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009119225227359914,"score_gpt":0.2783649677133679,"score_spread":0.26924574248600797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521607471","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072075096,0.0007186352,0.0013179648,0.9267672,0.0068879887,0.000058521855,0.00024415707,0.000100997095,0.056697156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048593245,0.00038307346,0.00063131365,0.9220765,0.0059627993,0.00008291959,0.00004654975,0.000052360054,0.022171268],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569064,0.0010501539,0.00037337575,0.0009807948,0.00096873776,0.0009362124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98355824,0.012581886,0.0005412067,0.00062589475,0.0021070922,0.0005856736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007947,0.00058487843,0.0010134184,0.0008051309,0.0068818214,0.0050163046,0.00562066,0.06269704,0.008855847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029873021,0.0008049392,0.0018589452,0.0008643022,0.009554023,0.0056753517,0.0032302544,0.03885657,0.0037793666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087478504,0.000026007929,0.001199693,0.000107663116,0.000018762845,0.001989674,0.004502471,0.0002621759,0.00055806735,0.31395736,0.6723837,0.0049069994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101745776,0.000096183074,0.003479941,0.00050999917,0.00005098214,0.0012467081,0.0077678165,0.0012586574,0.0014728451,0.11816652,0.8656475,0.00020112203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04288957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041990552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06269704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005021393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052000526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08527982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521747599","doi":"","title":"Ubaldus de Vries et Lyana Francot, Law’s environment: critical legal perspectives, Portland, Eleven International Publishing, 2011","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Ethnology; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.010200910172580326,"score_gpt":0.26549819910132133,"score_spread":0.255297288928741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521747599","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037149847,0.6577657,0.002551968,0.16832949,0.003834207,0.000035298897,0.00037582451,0.00008503696,0.16330747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12673645,0.54432285,0.003930122,0.024479259,0.0025342838,0.00019152286,0.00042928205,0.000365089,0.2970112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980216,0.00090946094,0.00011568642,0.00023326058,0.00051774224,0.00020230576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968184,0.0021254455,0.00026181986,0.00013810037,0.00045293933,0.0002031966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027961126,0.0012762619,0.0005599873,0.004213487,0.0070485645,0.011733465,0.0014819292,0.007415358,0.019051978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050719404,0.00078499387,0.0004144374,0.004833197,0.009824321,0.01496377,0.002966667,0.00610147,0.003472931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051477688,0.000052628035,0.0007564851,0.0005860713,0.000015419891,0.00043902453,0.018349117,0.0003569033,0.00020159828,0.50546294,0.40919584,0.06453264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009620066,0.000011180446,0.0014618161,0.0016094384,0.00000827699,0.00023004197,0.010234526,0.00013479871,0.00017541995,0.08488576,0.9012133,0.000025815165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052221924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09518365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052221924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0089076655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009136617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10383594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522273231","doi":"10.22215/etd/2016-11375","title":"Becoming the Camera: Body Worn Video and Shifting Expectations of Police Work","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Visibility; Assemblage (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Misconduct; Embodied cognition; Hierarchy; Narrative; Position (finance); Work (physics); Point (geometry); Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Visual arts; Computer science; Business; Geography; Art; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.015996989034137012,"score_gpt":0.31674148891914095,"score_spread":0.30074449988500396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522273231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58550304,0.007945537,0.0040542814,0.116320804,0.0012171032,0.000049428385,0.00015605373,0.00006503947,0.28468874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979988,0.0032798632,0.0003670459,0.0046554124,0.00024838504,0.00002461276,0.000039142895,0.000058213274,0.011339316],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959363,0.0025181207,0.000065948625,0.00025587625,0.0007804912,0.0004433412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955029,0.0017889962,0.00075156783,0.00015724252,0.00067147176,0.0011278528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025497442,0.00023942968,0.00013494052,0.0013453703,0.0054144626,0.010778419,0.0008725854,0.0021106226,0.007524912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01049365,0.00029919302,0.00015964729,0.0009043674,0.009421259,0.008812317,0.004158372,0.0034660413,0.00093099667],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001454155,0.00017448394,0.016507357,0.00015588819,0.000012288093,0.0013154416,0.7572083,0.000119825374,0.0013244987,0.08347926,0.034448422,0.105108924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012690033,0.00008222016,0.0174745,0.00046383322,0.000007771286,0.0008950336,0.8621434,0.00025015077,0.00034855455,0.013926127,0.10434462,0.000051021583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014286862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018151827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014286862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035778093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022156232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028407454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525455376","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1386","title":"Book Notes: Justice Defiled: Perverts, Potheads, Serial Killers and Lawyers, by Alan N. Young","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.011395772624187424,"score_gpt":0.2574076154960858,"score_spread":0.2460118428718984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525455376","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009367622,0.18879525,0.0010405501,0.62806857,0.0224174,0.000031993146,0.00041896733,0.0000856925,0.15820482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015281581,0.09596417,0.0011485412,0.15079539,0.014308482,0.00007539734,0.00023876621,0.00015032451,0.72203726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995334,0.0001302588,0.00002636325,0.0000691738,0.00019738376,0.00004341855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728334,0.0016499613,0.00012760688,0.00006285624,0.0006506105,0.00022556145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012449293,0.00065222726,0.00043695793,0.0014592182,0.0058274497,0.005755052,0.0011332857,0.0047086854,0.03417842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048991623,0.0006246914,0.00025434498,0.002219582,0.003918574,0.008429701,0.0015390122,0.0053084274,0.012250762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023054683,0.0000028932832,0.00004804929,0.000019749896,4.969865e-7,0.0000121721305,0.00021643193,0.000010892251,0.000009259654,0.0076181716,0.9877729,0.0042867116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047902663,0.0000040257573,0.00045299513,0.00024267464,0.000002623573,0.00006554855,0.001823233,0.000025802921,0.000046362635,0.009855895,0.9874685,0.0000076127876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06654737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24866493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06654737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003578352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005519114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13232005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525696777","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3056","title":"Book Note: Ordinary Meaning, A Theory Of The Most Fundamental Principle Of Legal Interpretation, by Brian G. Slocum","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Doctrine; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.007667790871206475,"score_gpt":0.26604546921013306,"score_spread":0.2583776783389266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525696777","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013628021,0.09627498,0.010862135,0.5021923,0.022388028,0.00004751995,0.0003183488,0.0001559231,0.36639798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07872935,0.1097905,0.014571174,0.1837721,0.036951292,0.00034291839,0.000558367,0.0005671037,0.5747172],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990513,0.00030743843,0.000039210732,0.00014016601,0.00040286878,0.000059077225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794215,0.0013466444,0.00007694337,0.000079476114,0.00045929305,0.00009538734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010983401,0.00069206505,0.00044475542,0.0013224517,0.0034999494,0.0038245327,0.00082409213,0.0024966744,0.00911738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00425159,0.000423082,0.00044448246,0.0018109728,0.007538046,0.007318118,0.0013616716,0.008337355,0.004099672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057305056,0.000007185238,0.00007665328,0.00003406072,0.0000026559153,0.000023456183,0.000510987,0.000085165564,0.00004207534,0.27130556,0.7169254,0.010981103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048352417,0.000005612114,0.00021056169,0.00015286947,0.0000023792322,0.000060211572,0.0003251695,0.0001399231,0.000057395628,0.14941438,0.84961766,0.000009000125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01224537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022763615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01224537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030286987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035860008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03050071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525782455","doi":"10.7202/1037411ar","title":"Jean-Marie Fecteau et l’histoire du droit en 3D","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin d histoire politique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008107006163866984,"score_gpt":0.23413917100843776,"score_spread":0.22603216484457078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525782455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028324695,0.04947412,0.008006921,0.2577053,0.013585864,0.00005934863,0.00024671876,0.00016764548,0.6424295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32597068,0.010179628,0.0022792197,0.017898671,0.002142194,0.00009394244,0.000066988556,0.00034820315,0.6410206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976751,0.0011157633,0.000073557545,0.00025756433,0.00048677283,0.0003912113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992805,0.00038806288,0.000054421715,0.000054543194,0.00014088697,0.00008150243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019463716,0.0007328273,0.00037330348,0.00081187946,0.0088420715,0.00840404,0.000766089,0.006200034,0.016720321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050305156,0.00041268245,0.00053311756,0.0008122803,0.008193221,0.003218183,0.0025380044,0.008825721,0.0019529781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036374324,0.000012470164,0.00029063804,0.00005240091,0.000008038692,0.0003231222,0.008782894,0.00025908352,0.0001775307,0.9336362,0.04436382,0.012057515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008092602,0.00000582562,0.0003693192,0.00008930352,0.000002823934,0.0001466907,0.0021982295,0.000089973975,0.00019397089,0.015415902,0.9814652,0.000014627405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18102881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16873652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18102881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010933722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006352966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35995024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527116240","doi":"10.1057/978-1-137-59023-7_7","title":"“The State of the Account Between Society and Himself”: Hyacinth Robinson’s Soldier’s Faith in The Princess Casamassima","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan US eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexive pronoun; Faith; Pragmatism; Philosophy; Law; Politics; State (computer science); Value (mathematics); Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01960583384441051,"score_gpt":0.2577632793123202,"score_spread":0.23815744546790968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527116240","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047136538,0.04747501,0.0017570974,0.0969276,0.0019437594,0.000020322903,0.000028845687,0.000048428104,0.8046624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7056598,0.011403345,0.0005846474,0.010009581,0.0008459453,0.00003776645,0.0000255167,0.00007639072,0.27135703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934787,0.00038213603,0.000008324415,0.000050942184,0.00012882936,0.0000819848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997079,0.00015926635,0.00002371626,0.00001914941,0.000037581573,0.000052409938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006552412,0.00024145991,0.00019304965,0.00035287248,0.004731752,0.0034953693,0.0005477058,0.0011643597,0.0037667986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015227507,0.00015267966,0.00009541209,0.0003975914,0.011096052,0.002966815,0.0016026886,0.003563579,0.0007414677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012530753,0.00002039501,0.000221491,0.000053841824,0.0000024395354,0.00027619343,0.15500054,0.00005463039,0.00017723287,0.74552363,0.082583934,0.01607322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006175717,0.000027135655,0.000969378,0.00029293878,0.000003826166,0.00027284204,0.055774305,0.000091114765,0.00017951206,0.050266594,0.8921053,0.000010907095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01709436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03149888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01709436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037669113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024095075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033989727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527168362","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1332","title":"Prolegomenon to an Intellectual History of Administrative Law in the Twentieth Century: The Case of John Willis and Canadian Administrative Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Harvard University","keywords":"Legal history; Law; Intellectual history; Context (archaeology); Administrative law; Comparative law; Work (physics); Political science; Sociology; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.05011595300853482,"score_gpt":0.317391189835039,"score_spread":0.26727523682650417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527168362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1572181,0.021647817,0.0017547533,0.19530845,0.0008460053,0.00005869277,0.00009613985,0.000057038167,0.6230131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9457764,0.006098819,0.00075587915,0.007967954,0.00021743735,0.000025127487,0.000017446268,0.000032991302,0.03910795],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950518,0.001246065,0.00007393792,0.00035728133,0.0014808216,0.0017901751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99265444,0.0033926927,0.0005040696,0.00022746126,0.0019087245,0.0013125587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045268326,0.0003412664,0.00034785247,0.004912932,0.060006395,0.012338487,0.0020307445,0.004293578,0.0041192416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013498632,0.0004091552,0.0003253195,0.0053982525,0.09844473,0.004928386,0.004760935,0.0053024683,0.00024132435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001272313,0.000011084058,0.0009011052,0.00003051052,0.000003682632,0.00043028762,0.1786884,0.00013872018,0.00007722553,0.7989494,0.01289311,0.007863697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014688195,0.000011283955,0.0059813755,0.00033953093,0.000015464237,0.0002991348,0.15273736,0.00028943247,0.00018611913,0.12952362,0.7105211,0.00008089062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97386813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9876391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15678011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15678011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1798238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97801554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527722782","doi":"","title":"The (Comic) Tragedy of Formalism in Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Natural law; Comics; Hypocrisy; Natural (archaeology); Comedy; English law; Literature; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Philosophy; History; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.029604800040771553,"score_gpt":0.32042208436345887,"score_spread":0.29081728432268733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527722782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14965662,0.005524641,0.0032610898,0.019769235,0.0006909101,0.00002047543,0.00004219278,0.0000630354,0.82097167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9044524,0.0006024454,0.00028307876,0.0012677057,0.000082500745,0.000008764992,0.00001003741,0.00003891555,0.09325413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987675,0.00065016287,0.000025532829,0.0001171845,0.00023094095,0.000208713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993832,0.0002917684,0.000042183172,0.0000659107,0.00010782014,0.00010911804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012108675,0.00018400094,0.00020387299,0.0004851336,0.0061778035,0.0051083197,0.00039286935,0.0011650604,0.0029284202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023129298,0.00019326237,0.000111081434,0.0003358142,0.01637377,0.0016370151,0.0017376712,0.0026810393,0.0004264424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025148618,0.000010931371,0.0004423996,0.000030157282,0.0000032428438,0.000348483,0.03513805,0.00019830048,0.0002250951,0.937507,0.017991498,0.0080797225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018945362,0.000059801594,0.0036331136,0.00031093214,0.0000091116435,0.000425569,0.029999511,0.0004955899,0.0012960809,0.11934422,0.8443454,0.00006177492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051112413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08669385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051112413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041818167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027022515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10162979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528568763","doi":"10.21083/csieci.v12i1.3726","title":"Improvisation in Process","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Parallels; Musical; Process (computing); Focus (optics); Epistemology; Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Art; Literature; Computer science; Visual arts","score_opus":0.078862349017545,"score_gpt":0.4735453626214715,"score_spread":0.3946830136039265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528568763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05697941,0.004385758,0.0753754,0.034389507,0.00061386585,0.00019558176,0.000046747213,0.00015807865,0.82785565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610724,0.0007761782,0.005641397,0.001488359,0.00018430417,0.0001568902,0.000021314581,0.00013444458,0.030524682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97740984,0.015815435,0.0005921602,0.0020687864,0.002878302,0.0012355598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850708,0.0101271765,0.0008944804,0.0019812805,0.0014257529,0.00050054694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014245461,0.00074019906,0.0005406579,0.0021327874,0.0099381115,0.017569253,0.0019800938,0.0054391283,0.006900723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021517226,0.00032165236,0.0006864242,0.001402708,0.09786702,0.016309394,0.009803377,0.0071095265,0.0009597391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058166047,0.000006058703,0.00005535197,0.000018995657,0.0000015862423,0.00006138555,0.0214839,0.000062950734,0.000077175864,0.9763792,0.00038782656,0.0014598143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018559373,0.000019495814,0.00015255703,0.0001626551,0.0000047368594,0.0001296855,0.018434994,0.00046192488,0.00055893563,0.88984215,0.09020198,0.000012202693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040939096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020942837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017569253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010063992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005542014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075338125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528764699","doi":"","title":"The Story of My Life: Fiction, Ethics and the Self at Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Cognitive dissonance; Law; Lawsuit; Harm; Conviction; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.008449564448875128,"score_gpt":0.2621771877024818,"score_spread":0.25372762325360665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528764699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12228884,0.024186779,0.006268781,0.24390717,0.005850161,0.000037517228,0.000090423644,0.00011563473,0.59725475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93871826,0.0048903883,0.0011291894,0.011266407,0.0012546632,0.000047034995,0.000035011257,0.000078065605,0.042580884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968599,0.0025243363,0.000031015923,0.00013651521,0.00023728525,0.0002108799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671507,0.0025011678,0.00021486357,0.00015062265,0.00014328923,0.00027509892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022928526,0.0005441658,0.0002812843,0.0011509587,0.01550383,0.009135279,0.0008754565,0.003357183,0.003239755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065059313,0.00023151639,0.00022172906,0.0007020332,0.043626923,0.006714194,0.0036571228,0.00620076,0.00080646743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020653837,0.000021858992,0.00046379596,0.00005684718,0.0000042924767,0.00074333395,0.3156926,0.00007749885,0.00014209918,0.62171626,0.052323267,0.008737462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007820629,0.000030160774,0.0004388444,0.0003280214,0.000004702652,0.0010554754,0.16327791,0.00013549218,0.00031610404,0.096388675,0.73800075,0.000016036362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029145372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004997419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01550383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047774888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019552677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03466326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528942509","doi":"10.1386/crre.7.2.247_1","title":"Embroidered portraiture and the intentional creation of human visibility and value","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Craft Research","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Depiction; Portrait; Aesthetics; Subject (documents); Shot (pellet); Subjectification; Psychology; Face (sociological concept); Value (mathematics); Visual arts; Art; Sociology; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06212759349512557,"score_gpt":0.42921907519829267,"score_spread":0.3670914817031671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528942509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45801404,0.0030889325,0.044109613,0.0059495894,0.0002444478,0.00009138991,0.00002712147,0.000094994764,0.4883798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893896,0.00022608915,0.0033236188,0.00008934757,0.000017772913,0.000014203381,0.000006670845,0.000020941969,0.0069117695],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946314,0.0040009934,0.00006809213,0.00040045351,0.000654806,0.0002442441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99638474,0.0020379457,0.00038218897,0.00061051326,0.0002965254,0.00028805618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037985225,0.00033208495,0.00021863883,0.0010386612,0.0027682355,0.0072153057,0.00075947517,0.0010946858,0.004051874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007049515,0.0002579941,0.00029613916,0.00046696624,0.02674455,0.004938505,0.0064651007,0.002124765,0.00035822773],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041120362,0.00003381617,0.0015446696,0.00012057397,0.000014300668,0.00077813404,0.5590317,0.00030311986,0.0050746934,0.40770805,0.0013424507,0.024007311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035673755,0.00023384437,0.0066629755,0.00071457896,0.0000405098,0.0027694686,0.36413485,0.0020024509,0.007196631,0.2427829,0.37334228,0.000083764404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010902185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013327929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072153057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018728782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010408424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020088792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529062326","doi":"10.1177/1743872116673162","title":"Monsters and Madwomen? Neurosis, Ambition and Mothering in Women Lawyers in Film","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Monster; Subjectivity; Psychoanalysis; Metaphor; Sociology; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Mode (computer interface); Aesthetics; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Psychology; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.01207733358889504,"score_gpt":0.21933268955251,"score_spread":0.20725535596361497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529062326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7647551,0.0071545653,0.0015650601,0.048168823,0.00065696007,0.000033680375,0.000047037203,0.00005287314,0.17756602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894448,0.0009697764,0.00016366866,0.0015770687,0.00009973418,0.00001248209,0.000006487039,0.000020453364,0.007705432],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716574,0.0021231384,0.00004340138,0.00012154562,0.0002262626,0.00032000963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809283,0.0012344437,0.00031261463,0.00006130287,0.00007653831,0.00022229219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016547352,0.0003804336,0.00034545406,0.0008794863,0.012756935,0.009424913,0.00062660285,0.0020536038,0.0038872024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050695306,0.0003551644,0.0001579109,0.000737151,0.024894154,0.005821191,0.0043456363,0.0040356466,0.00029243343],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020896037,0.000017790035,0.0013572961,0.000045031262,0.0000040096324,0.00057875656,0.94436824,0.0000137186535,0.00047534858,0.046383437,0.0034426898,0.0032927752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008292389,0.000027856442,0.0019743403,0.00016908853,0.0000070570627,0.0005058651,0.8997336,0.000050981413,0.0004255428,0.004692728,0.09239105,0.000013506862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007616101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01593988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012756935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033786476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010380222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0245139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529124723","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2845383","title":"A Transnational Study of Law &amp; Justice on TV: Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01485368614094672,"score_gpt":0.2832618779057957,"score_spread":0.268408191764849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529124723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92295164,0.0015346163,0.00022600961,0.009162324,0.000078125464,0.000086299704,0.0010904525,0.0000132592995,0.064857304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97694916,0.001197652,0.00018569775,0.0010968839,0.000015785949,0.000041212264,0.00031070894,0.000029735533,0.020173213],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677974,0.0003699611,0.00006004626,0.00035257186,0.0008033089,0.0016344603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935668,0.0011050767,0.00044403976,0.00015951516,0.0028197377,0.0019047847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014658113,0.00043588044,0.00077250146,0.0032345008,0.037811086,0.010745808,0.002143645,0.002605431,0.013589672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064696413,0.0005691091,0.0004872383,0.012096203,0.0068902057,0.0039299363,0.004520857,0.004801472,0.000658469],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034375433,0.0006671359,0.2306041,0.00030524514,0.00012217861,0.0014740429,0.56502664,0.0008255535,0.00096902496,0.10583912,0.043105286,0.050717983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025759313,0.00006494253,0.20016804,0.00027911927,0.00006919316,0.00014726954,0.7295519,0.00058054517,0.00021479887,0.0020420775,0.066768415,0.000087890025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9989629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99960846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13022771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13022771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18700203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9448726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529687110","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1399","title":"Book Notes: Essentials of Canadian Law. Media Law, Second Edition, by Robert Martin","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.010191464761653892,"score_gpt":0.24224676912000384,"score_spread":0.23205530435834995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529687110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00062144024,0.17061754,0.0012658009,0.09280984,0.008085168,0.00008668417,0.0022607376,0.0002549042,0.72399795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0119676115,0.069982946,0.0011061372,0.01121526,0.0021463325,0.000068657355,0.00077775866,0.000146232,0.9025891],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989072,0.000057767877,0.000022438775,0.000080411686,0.00076300086,0.0001691423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986609,0.00021563646,0.000050080373,0.000046802896,0.00089974445,0.00012674148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073110714,0.0010895192,0.00059798703,0.0050244243,0.007949177,0.0058269748,0.0016212203,0.002750421,0.07620059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028452992,0.0006722535,0.00036362128,0.007298051,0.004092073,0.004628171,0.000923548,0.0029037253,0.013821332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000310809,0.000004451076,0.000048683618,0.000048585844,7.5101667e-7,0.000009671423,0.0002283953,0.000021806303,0.000026554408,0.028556632,0.9540367,0.017014792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016572992,0.0000017142621,0.00050171075,0.00012549924,0.0000019672602,0.00002134259,0.00027265263,0.000025718435,0.00002914122,0.004852581,0.99415934,0.00000680054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8852244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95562965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1147756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028657008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033750575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25491637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530251047","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1231","title":"Book Notes: Lex Populi: the Jurisprudence of Popular Culture, by William P. Macneil","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal culture; Law; Art; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.014223855984662267,"score_gpt":0.29671425680779345,"score_spread":0.2824904008231312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530251047","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016270153,0.2838834,0.0020345189,0.35555878,0.011528582,0.00003018117,0.0007464951,0.00015196626,0.34443906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042376883,0.14397721,0.0020361517,0.06390351,0.019336034,0.00015459869,0.000492219,0.00032407808,0.72739923],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996728,0.00010636102,0.000016948974,0.00005281597,0.00012428164,0.000026859367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871075,0.00083268154,0.00007395052,0.000053682576,0.000241772,0.000087137494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056474656,0.00086219644,0.00042714048,0.0027567334,0.003715333,0.0056027607,0.0009619655,0.0034277826,0.037132252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024364267,0.0004695101,0.00026149582,0.0039698067,0.005113746,0.0075162556,0.0014347114,0.0046396414,0.010251644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000745411,0.000008991046,0.00012002167,0.000080170576,0.0000023371686,0.000028638908,0.0006992308,0.00004609476,0.000056115216,0.077148125,0.90802735,0.013775377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066784196,0.000006445042,0.0006815978,0.00039113295,0.0000028141944,0.00006696044,0.0009683066,0.000068328474,0.00012197653,0.030178264,0.96749586,0.000011600767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041791447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11069065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041791447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004045944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024956272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124219775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530828303","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2982","title":"Book Review: Vicarious Kinks: S/M In The Socio-Legal Imaginary,
 by Ummni Khan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Imaginary; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.016181283293113517,"score_gpt":0.30126788859299897,"score_spread":0.28508660529988544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530828303","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001778944,0.58995944,0.00015440735,0.292956,0.1012685,0.000025515086,0.0001325688,0.000029481582,0.015296147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00499497,0.50237876,0.00033636607,0.24451748,0.13333164,0.000102873695,0.00021384849,0.000100760095,0.11402334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988896,0.00031737617,0.00009117936,0.00014689124,0.00047202627,0.00008290741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99522674,0.0025871773,0.00026770847,0.000106093175,0.001412691,0.0003997051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019304676,0.0006878121,0.00098946,0.0026792116,0.0019396612,0.0042463206,0.001563852,0.0066784774,0.015076261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011135809,0.0005129192,0.00038069536,0.0033803245,0.002892802,0.0048668953,0.0017484275,0.0061152037,0.0074714376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026036964,0.0000017399461,0.000014609517,0.00012169171,0.0000014580266,0.000011924918,0.000024673049,0.000006677125,0.000006642168,0.00076348486,0.99273986,0.0063048205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055068676,0.000005348685,0.00015590878,0.00063807785,0.000004336205,0.00010486123,0.00010149832,0.000012082601,0.000012322495,0.00092510076,0.99802953,0.0000054877114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01658889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04960943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01658889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041098534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077141235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050435066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531144783","doi":"10.1057/978-1-137-55582-3_2","title":"Peeling a Charley: Evolution of Public Opinion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Skepticism; Public opinion; Law enforcement; Enforcement; Variety (cybernetics); Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037284159501533055,"score_gpt":0.27517690877350764,"score_spread":0.2378927492719746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531144783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040910985,0.017785419,0.0028536718,0.069087304,0.0012283319,0.000020786529,0.000059498794,0.000053178712,0.8680008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8749793,0.008381371,0.000930005,0.0073467963,0.00081414817,0.00002746976,0.00005666913,0.00010059602,0.10736367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699354,0.0016847352,0.00005810942,0.00028820307,0.00068609876,0.0002892604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723923,0.0019196603,0.00015481125,0.00012334333,0.00042312246,0.00013989353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004532647,0.00023003337,0.00019763845,0.0012928711,0.004677174,0.008737492,0.000609965,0.0021369583,0.0063781743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059976056,0.00018875443,0.00017167217,0.0018932789,0.014474275,0.0059250784,0.0021573245,0.0033878637,0.0009969757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017504271,0.000015034769,0.00048615932,0.00006561658,0.0000037409582,0.00025606374,0.103359394,0.00010632781,0.0002655655,0.82728475,0.025579851,0.042560007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007399547,0.000021115888,0.001405615,0.0003018107,0.0000037950012,0.00015124581,0.035356376,0.00017752616,0.00030406256,0.15912065,0.80313116,0.0000192571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0096000265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008273574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0096000265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007284455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029848719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05285263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532687725","doi":"10.1017/s0022216x16001723","title":"Vikki Bell , The Art of Post-Dictatorship: Ethics and Aesthetics in Transitional Argentina (Abingdon, UK, and New York: Routledge, 2016), pp. xvi + 170, £75.00, hb.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Latin American Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Dictatorship; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Economic history; Political economy; History; Law; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.06508848017171803,"score_gpt":0.3316062223286632,"score_spread":0.2665177421569452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532687725","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003302218,0.6742895,0.0029072075,0.10593737,0.004629919,0.000057558864,0.00035633732,0.00011688994,0.20840302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22349714,0.4816235,0.005298454,0.026878685,0.004875333,0.00048087098,0.00053797604,0.00071593,0.25609216],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835616,0.000977008,0.000052833202,0.00012898093,0.00026918465,0.00021577634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859196,0.0009772048,0.00011963688,0.00006621528,0.00014180511,0.000103142294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001877781,0.0010635523,0.000535992,0.0011216566,0.0069478806,0.005764593,0.00172863,0.004423136,0.018848555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004145803,0.00060246035,0.00032781644,0.0017300928,0.008641559,0.008684364,0.0021369949,0.004035336,0.0049105966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007998245,0.000036695754,0.00048188414,0.000729089,0.0000139916665,0.00025256496,0.02613832,0.0001697288,0.00019244499,0.29657632,0.63035846,0.044970505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019466874,0.00001291161,0.0027371703,0.0013602853,0.000008865442,0.00019157822,0.009712532,0.00014232812,0.00021836667,0.080779746,0.9047894,0.000027406206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04114261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09111013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04114261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005706935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040150215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08180624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2536010015","doi":"10.1111/lsi.12230","title":"American Legal Realism and Anthropology","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Koneen Säätiö; York University; Helsingin Yliopisto","keywords":"Conservatism; Formalism (music); Politics; Realism; Sociology; Legal realism; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Legal profession; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.03819216931505765,"score_gpt":0.3680442451895397,"score_spread":0.32985207587448206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2536010015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027815126,0.06428486,0.009307831,0.14253229,0.0020484766,0.00002982432,0.00008225881,0.000049814236,0.7538495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91538537,0.023341872,0.0056446716,0.013859067,0.0033201892,0.00013386585,0.00008325787,0.0000588668,0.038172867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99465984,0.0038250063,0.00012719173,0.00041693248,0.0007098043,0.00026124742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960284,0.0025895946,0.00031824215,0.00045383075,0.00038897837,0.00022096292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049765925,0.0004147478,0.0004490585,0.0040339027,0.00782779,0.008148225,0.0007310692,0.003031045,0.004747279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064380965,0.00024701256,0.00027965984,0.0026192141,0.036144543,0.005484934,0.0048183217,0.0040705204,0.00051301357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017107504,0.000004668538,0.00012451377,0.000014896228,0.0000012489087,0.000014883037,0.0019111411,0.000051892435,0.000015621123,0.99311197,0.0021103444,0.002637245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038353746,0.000005830695,0.00042718815,0.00016105155,0.0000025225188,0.000041938743,0.0022656699,0.00014354633,0.000026859974,0.843732,0.15318386,0.0000057023876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005578661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005783503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008148225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064568883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042746714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046848178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2536611628","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316585481.012","title":"Looking for the Informal Judge","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.024221493376984083,"score_gpt":0.22760267641174195,"score_spread":0.20338118303475786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2536611628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028163367,0.0041069477,0.0021425846,0.03886274,0.0012868062,0.000019333078,0.000029812189,0.000031283842,0.9507042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22830668,0.0021515754,0.001113631,0.019763658,0.0012783174,0.00008875117,0.000044586566,0.0001792534,0.74707353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997556,0.0010489483,0.00006395929,0.00042101787,0.0004945489,0.00041545246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982516,0.00086293806,0.00008328653,0.00027270056,0.00028843,0.00024096676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00309235,0.00054261176,0.0006100391,0.0012168712,0.010001415,0.013858968,0.0010731182,0.0079558315,0.034943145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010077873,0.00039497926,0.00034183508,0.0009665885,0.02256296,0.014234878,0.0046079555,0.011791659,0.00708316],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004280105,0.000006198506,0.000031662996,0.0000088413835,7.276077e-7,0.000024441355,0.0022852395,0.000012784554,0.000019123137,0.96495306,0.028735226,0.0039184513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010588273,0.0000071004056,0.00013163008,0.00016282102,0.0000032689518,0.000045841847,0.004051185,0.00010623954,0.000076807264,0.57497585,0.42041725,0.000011381127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012788098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025271839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034943145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005027014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004820236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11689645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547563777","doi":"10.1111/lsi.12251","title":"Are Judges Street-Level Bureaucrats? Evidence from French and Canadian Family Courts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Discretion; Bureaucracy; Law; Political science; Position (finance); Common core; Bridge (graph theory); Public administration; Core (optical fiber); Sociology; Engineering; Business","score_opus":0.1341030560614524,"score_gpt":0.33885078355446735,"score_spread":0.20474772749301495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547563777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97401506,0.0023559215,0.00016657163,0.003029255,0.000026607726,0.000024386252,0.00020820023,0.000004407493,0.020169599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978728,0.0006913931,0.00006254087,0.00035912334,0.000009665179,0.000008603122,0.00007301539,0.000004646408,0.00091811985],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98592234,0.003442557,0.00052487245,0.0016836701,0.0038625214,0.004563943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9458027,0.022094203,0.00900378,0.002013607,0.017223483,0.0038622648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010453976,0.00026840708,0.00073697296,0.0052496498,0.016009793,0.007582173,0.0024085552,0.002104452,0.004450817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047015116,0.0006068387,0.00032378882,0.0066438755,0.009927617,0.0023304417,0.0032179905,0.0017637501,0.00034935283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003281091,0.00016486416,0.44050384,0.00026475673,0.000111017784,0.0011493469,0.48666328,0.00021574664,0.000546665,0.021211438,0.007553422,0.041287623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003021565,0.00006815036,0.61141,0.00059765147,0.00007849034,0.00026611448,0.36238283,0.00030706334,0.00025688103,0.0011489547,0.023384366,0.00006919597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98351467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05233386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05233386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03568106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3797105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549534690","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12226","title":"<i>Foucault and the Politics of Rights</i> . By Ben Golder. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2015. 246 pp. $24.95 cloth.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Politics; Sociology; Citation; Law; Media studies; Art history; Political science; History","score_opus":0.01211895170433043,"score_gpt":0.2571793043804896,"score_spread":0.24506035267615917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549534690","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014257731,0.91328186,0.00028036296,0.057008684,0.0034525746,0.0000059559634,0.00005478543,0.00004148318,0.025731703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028706765,0.7534227,0.0017963947,0.04322933,0.010944799,0.000115574316,0.0001903221,0.00020291527,0.16139118],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985374,0.0006560581,0.00006577358,0.00015370938,0.00043651595,0.00015047727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853504,0.00084349787,0.0001570709,0.0001014329,0.00026015184,0.00010265715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021806827,0.0015366041,0.00083447347,0.0028787642,0.002843579,0.0035864506,0.0011746007,0.0046071946,0.0183757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049850363,0.0008651649,0.0006712033,0.0025098275,0.008329876,0.008277972,0.0021296183,0.004459607,0.007763492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012875277,0.000009126143,0.00008149425,0.00028842167,0.0000073823053,0.000030077912,0.00044225986,0.0000437349,0.00004515514,0.043925785,0.9119242,0.043189496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063284147,0.000008120174,0.0005605769,0.0012252617,0.000006220754,0.00014425124,0.00048335674,0.000060610964,0.00007184364,0.047732495,0.9496893,0.000011590354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028859593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05853261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028859593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005799089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040280754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061472833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2549987637","doi":"10.1177/1362480616659814","title":"Cops, cameras, and the policing of ethics","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Criminology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Washington State University; Arizona State University","keywords":"Subjectivity; Pragmatism; Sociology; Law enforcement; Field (mathematics); Pessimism; Relation (database); Police science; Drone; Media studies; Criminology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Epistemology; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.057988037386004825,"score_gpt":0.3461619014617127,"score_spread":0.2881738640757079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2549987637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10740649,0.025492698,0.029244503,0.15440647,0.0012228215,0.00011997836,0.00006561331,0.00009473155,0.6819467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97549474,0.0040362603,0.003663263,0.0047993595,0.00039009066,0.000094544834,0.000013656764,0.00006587986,0.011442174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98777956,0.009699599,0.00020309594,0.0006565046,0.0009827819,0.00067849376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918549,0.004804099,0.0012295855,0.00068995927,0.00089701125,0.0005244672],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006927014,0.00061816466,0.00031600246,0.0029916298,0.013272588,0.012044834,0.0009953338,0.0039421925,0.004110583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012810041,0.00044119445,0.0002888553,0.0018825202,0.093851276,0.01062447,0.0068957903,0.0048175715,0.00042770032],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010059279,0.000009661154,0.00094749953,0.000041637293,0.000003396796,0.000077382865,0.025913797,0.00013959275,0.00006472305,0.96058357,0.0038959172,0.008312788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017698885,0.000045336677,0.0024438687,0.000669658,0.000009293911,0.00036305108,0.07263757,0.0006945358,0.00065525237,0.61648774,0.3059353,0.000040648367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01180042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009425041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9867274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077098426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004786498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055939138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552262312","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1323","title":"Book Notes: Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning, by Neil MacCormick","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Rule of law; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.007317789429444101,"score_gpt":0.2424891440363576,"score_spread":0.2351713546069135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552262312","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014732453,0.15022016,0.011671946,0.574316,0.009049552,0.000033501434,0.00035715615,0.00011889598,0.25275946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12938483,0.19486289,0.021972425,0.1794209,0.047041547,0.00037556168,0.00047654848,0.00058768265,0.4258776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925977,0.00026839782,0.00003585959,0.00012939435,0.0002691032,0.000037463837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929859,0.005699196,0.00017317003,0.00019947531,0.0008162895,0.00012597247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001419906,0.0007442889,0.0006458209,0.0024065548,0.003637903,0.0068050693,0.0015487795,0.0051060645,0.014698819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00807053,0.00069149537,0.00039091232,0.0034176738,0.012359227,0.017166167,0.0013393448,0.008467565,0.0034870496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009222661,0.000012509811,0.00006521471,0.00007237821,0.0000041024646,0.000026737323,0.00065825053,0.00018142893,0.0000357614,0.5396028,0.4491157,0.010215831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014488099,0.0000057779907,0.00023940807,0.00028137225,0.0000071852323,0.00007549902,0.0004628085,0.0002966933,0.00011706883,0.516223,0.4822567,0.000020011183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024290783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041424565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024290783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003999106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030389156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04917252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552498102","doi":"","title":"Derrida's Territorial Knowledge of Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Problem of universals; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Hegelianism; Identity (music); Philosophy of law; Context (archaeology); Virtue; Sociology; Comparative law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.012607180449262352,"score_gpt":0.305400607348223,"score_spread":0.29279342689896065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552498102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008972721,0.020964585,0.0115721645,0.0981768,0.001579497,0.000032879994,0.00015314779,0.00007696598,0.8584712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75222313,0.010722455,0.006018826,0.029120069,0.0019633337,0.00023302838,0.00014165597,0.00018124087,0.1993962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726033,0.00096536486,0.00011382304,0.000775041,0.00062451564,0.0002610091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986154,0.0006825725,0.000089603425,0.0002728473,0.0002483159,0.00009124374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001520929,0.00059555715,0.00058362744,0.001496166,0.004220555,0.006335183,0.0012894615,0.004407242,0.0055369837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004183229,0.00034561727,0.0005747506,0.001092204,0.020354839,0.005992204,0.0034930015,0.004748741,0.0013912746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003122077,0.0000021921435,0.00003283294,0.000012118926,0.0000014421964,0.000015959162,0.0014262097,0.000047677346,0.00002468981,0.9887904,0.007609154,0.002034212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006038124,0.0000059031245,0.00022952573,0.00008777802,0.0000044127937,0.00008828316,0.0009728088,0.00020511793,0.00018920963,0.5089446,0.48925373,0.00001257395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011763039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010382555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011763039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077451374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029483037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05619514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553425494","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3055","title":"Book Note: Creating Legal Worlds: Story And Style In A Culture Of Argument, by Greig Henderson","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Argumentative; Jurisprudence; Storytelling; Rhetoric; Style (visual arts); Narrative; Law; Legal formalism; Legal writing; Sociology; Legal realism; Scholarship; Legal culture; Political science; Epistemology; Legal research; Comparative law; Black letter law; Literature; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.010017214788951144,"score_gpt":0.2650488707464636,"score_spread":0.2550316559575125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553425494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069530834,0.0806505,0.008603047,0.30796996,0.011031105,0.000076841105,0.00026734732,0.00018514316,0.58426315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15896738,0.059265714,0.011779531,0.06698394,0.0062306053,0.00015357348,0.00030859103,0.0004013157,0.6959094],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993463,0.00028434966,0.00001753866,0.000081052785,0.00022670938,0.000043997676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989334,0.0006991541,0.000056422126,0.000047449703,0.00017038544,0.0000931801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006474772,0.00040989087,0.00024391586,0.00063688523,0.0035676532,0.0060364683,0.00065581786,0.0018242325,0.0068213567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030818384,0.00028672937,0.00020642443,0.0009803557,0.0054041008,0.0069348575,0.0013852569,0.0035899777,0.0019785243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009670869,0.000015438363,0.00018878614,0.000051949915,0.0000032877945,0.00010136749,0.008187344,0.00014157023,0.0001571964,0.17940132,0.7906776,0.021064438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019915292,0.0000054921425,0.00026006484,0.000088595596,0.0000021701667,0.000118485965,0.0036735798,0.00008304027,0.00008710351,0.015105355,0.98056865,0.0000054380953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0187352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03835563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0187352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002590186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023170423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037252307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2556608743","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-40343-4_11","title":"(Im)Morality in Action","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Redeemer University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Action (physics); Moral obligation; Obligation; Equivalence (formal languages); Psychology; Outcome (game theory); Law; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Economics; Mathematical economics; Physics","score_opus":0.07263612183383163,"score_gpt":0.33768165354468876,"score_spread":0.26504553171085715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2556608743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004354583,0.0074843294,0.0028854304,0.0036166045,0.0011165447,0.000013673343,0.000034255365,0.000031237967,0.98438233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029117245,0.004883922,0.0017547451,0.0019979747,0.0010267542,0.00006981375,0.00005765518,0.00012572973,0.96096617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995078,0.00019675457,0.000016213979,0.00006205948,0.00016715248,0.000050053197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997385,0.00011182559,0.000017433924,0.00003953233,0.00006438626,0.000028319759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007131304,0.000711002,0.00032954646,0.0010300266,0.002171626,0.004858411,0.00082032953,0.002619757,0.03979022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012301274,0.00021442478,0.00024558904,0.0009521332,0.0057535265,0.0050363475,0.0018775254,0.0034411522,0.011339272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025915429,0.000008380063,0.000021651365,0.0000458648,8.578205e-7,0.000015471733,0.0011133525,0.00007029655,0.000051822604,0.91136026,0.065468036,0.021841435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002119196,0.0000037900152,0.000071565686,0.00020137471,0.0000013873927,0.000054079275,0.00044906107,0.00013216946,0.00007764086,0.21451423,0.7844888,0.0000038133564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039030674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008329982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03979022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003317491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026385665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13311154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2557701751","doi":"","title":"The City as a Work of Art: London, Paris, Vienna, by Donald J. Olsen","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of History","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Sociology; Art; Media studies; Art history; Engineering","score_opus":0.012935464484492171,"score_gpt":0.24793594269898106,"score_spread":0.23500047821448888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2557701751","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008051009,0.91621953,0.0003914222,0.035888042,0.004566478,0.000009415142,0.00019068627,0.000040334242,0.041888967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062175088,0.6539984,0.0013222573,0.0063182274,0.006001792,0.000065315675,0.0002967987,0.00024315034,0.269579],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876815,0.0004997251,0.00010952637,0.0002015382,0.00027339283,0.00014761157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988238,0.00054130796,0.00013114473,0.000092150476,0.00021614625,0.00019549136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015608646,0.002397188,0.0010105853,0.004428298,0.0045652813,0.012954529,0.0011320258,0.004397033,0.018108817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002608482,0.0013667895,0.0006457074,0.00975932,0.008828688,0.010143092,0.003418684,0.0045193117,0.0050423485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004348176,0.000022022396,0.00042964797,0.0006869652,0.0000263511,0.00019897369,0.013176493,0.0004715237,0.00009546343,0.13832869,0.77660257,0.069917835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003889609,0.000004287744,0.00080530037,0.0009706382,0.000007757285,0.0001368617,0.0053782156,0.00004192797,0.000039096,0.010780936,0.9818196,0.000011503458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.079608984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17542125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079608984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013059914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068885153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15829122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559598677","doi":"10.7202/1037969ar","title":"La philosophie politique et le Code civil du Québec : l’exemple de la notion de patrimoine","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016440420598486754,"score_gpt":0.2810855813019206,"score_spread":0.2646451607034338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559598677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15499745,0.010314377,0.0122592775,0.045454703,0.00037861223,0.00005686676,0.00045463114,0.00007539558,0.7760086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9175799,0.0027685014,0.0015770452,0.0019042598,0.000056901383,0.000036462512,0.00007169901,0.00003159726,0.07597364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987488,0.0003554157,0.000023956527,0.00016571232,0.00042104704,0.0002852062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989103,0.00031247857,0.000103055594,0.000092487215,0.00042694793,0.00015483792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007777691,0.0003169526,0.00023878041,0.0013464624,0.010424396,0.0053626243,0.0007453372,0.0018143643,0.008945265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018805775,0.00019333627,0.00018001033,0.002316855,0.01922762,0.0023732753,0.0017975954,0.0029173254,0.00040560376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001082828,0.0000056626855,0.0017831317,0.000047321748,0.000005869743,0.00011640666,0.028100878,0.00021469081,0.00023663245,0.9524224,0.006329461,0.010726718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016478492,0.000027022676,0.023535958,0.00054640515,0.000030223753,0.00024027648,0.04377741,0.0013979529,0.00045226363,0.12604587,0.8038614,0.00006876825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91770756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9516203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08229244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04405597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035851214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31964993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560323042","doi":"10.3138/cjh.41.2.383","title":"<i>Retroactive Justice: Prehistory of Post-Communism</i>, by István Rév","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of History","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Communism; Prehistory; Economic Justice; Political science; Ancient history; Archaeology; Law; History; Politics","score_opus":0.010784845669720926,"score_gpt":0.24941056903585415,"score_spread":0.23862572336613322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560323042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022564894,0.0796032,0.0018558648,0.3801646,0.006800735,0.00004111777,0.00011781174,0.00008309607,0.50876874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67981017,0.016017709,0.00094780733,0.093514584,0.0049356758,0.0001359928,0.000071735034,0.00024392412,0.2043224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976889,0.0010785031,0.00007511626,0.00033023866,0.0003230579,0.0005042319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828416,0.0010304706,0.00016941201,0.00020540792,0.00016967882,0.00014080369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032178361,0.00052733964,0.0004583149,0.0009580471,0.015228572,0.013676716,0.0017860995,0.013035151,0.005603178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006217649,0.0003867906,0.0003927347,0.0016180066,0.03437943,0.011943348,0.004810282,0.0122823715,0.00087657076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000089,0.000010783697,0.0001168571,0.000035599183,0.000003348978,0.00006440366,0.012356328,0.000024374178,0.00002616409,0.93962824,0.044404134,0.003320938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010040996,0.000013919366,0.0010433464,0.00032567006,0.0000079200645,0.00014229526,0.013483916,0.000089838955,0.000269079,0.2847791,0.69980943,0.000025304065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025766833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05613169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025766833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007867534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007849243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05708319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560516450","doi":"","title":"The Duel in Early Modern England: Civility, Politeness and Honour, by Markku Peltonen","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of History","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Politeness; Honour; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.011746506808609324,"score_gpt":0.2390416140332763,"score_spread":0.22729510722466698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560516450","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04372198,0.6726162,0.000743995,0.21763083,0.006208917,0.000022405711,0.00015885779,0.000025356934,0.058871526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51290697,0.25727537,0.00075217267,0.022928549,0.0068955347,0.00006438474,0.00009279238,0.0001437612,0.19894046],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993118,0.00033661828,0.000040174804,0.00012394068,0.00010585257,0.00008154183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981976,0.0012635171,0.00012620672,0.00004875197,0.00017337644,0.00019048432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014326635,0.0004628543,0.00060164125,0.0008219507,0.003581618,0.0054546115,0.00049180014,0.0020294131,0.0050175185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036929094,0.00054239505,0.0001347718,0.0009997254,0.0064095366,0.006956064,0.0027909493,0.0047144163,0.0010832786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015806033,0.000101827325,0.003188973,0.0015458155,0.000031814576,0.0008068748,0.34392813,0.0002645456,0.0008686738,0.21147895,0.31548837,0.122137964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009144648,0.000028636076,0.0064116213,0.0013456013,0.000008994206,0.0004456104,0.04189028,0.00011800408,0.00021703693,0.017981416,0.93150264,0.00004095737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033506244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07612733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033506244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034463562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026211732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066622436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566664090","doi":"10.3138/cjh.40.1.100","title":"<i>The Duel in Early Modern England: Civility, Politeness and Honour</i>, by Markku Peltonen","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of History","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Politeness; Honour; Sociology; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.010161935723194562,"score_gpt":0.23995827116499058,"score_spread":0.229796335441796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566664090","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02763804,0.4616602,0.00078250456,0.40089017,0.014361432,0.00002261823,0.00020476386,0.000039194038,0.09440102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46476018,0.17079537,0.0006027635,0.046221215,0.011952932,0.0000785988,0.00014241638,0.00022993858,0.30521667],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930346,0.00036287462,0.000035985035,0.00010338356,0.0001069806,0.000087381166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869835,0.0008810375,0.00010928313,0.000046405567,0.00013535548,0.0001295053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001128432,0.00050949125,0.00043911356,0.0007708792,0.00438515,0.0061162934,0.00049890217,0.0022998946,0.0061243367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032935443,0.00046306528,0.00015974474,0.0011658225,0.006642374,0.0076150494,0.0025067232,0.00500529,0.0012107326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008575828,0.000037575366,0.0017811545,0.000759627,0.000020402347,0.0004031408,0.16841264,0.00013134567,0.00050962745,0.16905403,0.60360825,0.055196557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006202593,0.00001566138,0.0041006007,0.00060168706,0.0000058449127,0.00027421844,0.030729951,0.00006637112,0.00019322144,0.011112103,0.95286566,0.000028436742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049673267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11627273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049673267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038913537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022339416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098768234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567437731","doi":"10.1017/cls.2016.35","title":"Aboriginal Knowledges in Specialized Courts: Emerging Practices in Gladue Courts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Oppression; Supreme court; Normative; Law; Political science; Criminology; Race (biology); Sociology; Gender studies; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.019386349046250157,"score_gpt":0.3162856588985326,"score_spread":0.29689930985228247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567437731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9590126,0.0009855931,0.0007482638,0.007998286,0.00004613603,0.0000620525,0.000014595626,0.000010341009,0.031122066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962125,0.00041705975,0.0003990306,0.00041401808,0.000014326883,0.000011590363,0.0000063677703,0.000005469671,0.0025195666],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98978794,0.0057044243,0.00029855242,0.0008745286,0.0013993164,0.0019353477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777594,0.012380662,0.0019236876,0.0010943677,0.0036560523,0.0031857805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014211693,0.00029726783,0.0005058002,0.004405809,0.029176507,0.013595445,0.0025833037,0.0028670698,0.0045231534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027594917,0.00059521076,0.0003019244,0.0023699123,0.030991659,0.0055977656,0.014261922,0.005656048,0.00025472578],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031301308,0.000008241253,0.0016836255,0.0000124870985,0.0000012056455,0.0003167493,0.9919595,0.0000067269243,0.000120509496,0.003486654,0.00011723033,0.0022839468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013772225,0.000012341299,0.0031471949,0.00009326418,0.000004210127,0.00018087303,0.9857814,0.000044666307,0.000101878955,0.0016473436,0.008974691,0.0000109524235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33848518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47604176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6615148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017358625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022801828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67302996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2569283157","doi":"10.1515/sem-2016-0063","title":"Clues as information, the semiotic gap, and inferential investigative processes, or making a (very small) contribution to the new discipline, Forensic Semiotics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Semiotica","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Sociology; Semiotics of culture; Epistemology; Linguistics; Cognitive science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035031561749266416,"score_gpt":0.3240767523242599,"score_spread":0.2890451905749935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2569283157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0692479,0.052086484,0.26368514,0.07908442,0.0029202693,0.00014366496,0.00022146915,0.0002530876,0.5323575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9467535,0.0091749495,0.027063513,0.0019875711,0.0009423291,0.000090184374,0.00005639322,0.00007353884,0.01385808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99267405,0.0050037913,0.00029917408,0.0005611783,0.0011875828,0.00027418853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98776406,0.009135658,0.00062598026,0.0012027117,0.000916123,0.00035550853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007233117,0.00047810856,0.0006285237,0.003015557,0.0036368351,0.010768296,0.0008028938,0.0024219884,0.0032181419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011330814,0.00026132332,0.00038549557,0.0019364798,0.0640568,0.014940656,0.005780567,0.0031468617,0.00046890075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058048013,0.000002839768,0.00006996423,0.000043009517,0.0000016112281,0.000025975474,0.003588267,0.000072790295,0.00007089124,0.9919403,0.0004660905,0.0037123566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040507066,0.000011134605,0.00015922253,0.00015703605,0.0000036277067,0.00011522174,0.0046052514,0.00046843203,0.00023689363,0.9415999,0.05262768,0.000011601203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030932645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022840959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010768296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042543043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034663903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03825283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571457398","doi":"10.1163/15691330-12341406","title":"Honor and Human Rights: A Comparative Study of Russia and Ukraine","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Sociology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Bard College","keywords":"Dignity; Honor; Ukrainian; Human rights; Context (archaeology); Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Descriptive statistics; Sociology; Law; Geography; Linguistics; Statistics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08481813822523271,"score_gpt":0.39834748415458476,"score_spread":0.31352934592935205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571457398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936231,0.0011062662,0.000051451574,0.00011935055,0.0000064138153,0.0000033022293,0.000019942514,7.4322594e-7,0.0050695403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988558,0.0006519857,0.000024678959,0.000031544314,0.0000045681923,0.0000040280875,0.000021156331,0.0000015028484,0.0004047702],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989761,0.0005243302,0.000053776836,0.000094055744,0.00015325994,0.00019845268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864537,0.0007295758,0.00030736008,0.000044330885,0.00013308,0.00014021428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012592964,0.0001400934,0.00061682693,0.0030363249,0.0036988824,0.002366222,0.00040656765,0.00043974147,0.0021093667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031391615,0.00015033271,0.00018715193,0.004615694,0.0027008732,0.0018377904,0.0027811367,0.00059036765,0.00015715654],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012844177,0.00015450199,0.14309901,0.00035155253,0.00008325749,0.0021940384,0.8024194,0.00014331596,0.0010469748,0.017653352,0.0006019304,0.03212424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005465988,0.00013367353,0.42701474,0.00021490526,0.0000342113,0.0006933037,0.5540496,0.00008372914,0.00019535603,0.00072203914,0.016837964,0.000014952169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037688028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056222238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037688028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031948406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021480445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074937284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571866998","doi":"10.1017/s0012217316000305","title":"Bird on an Ethics Wire: Battles about Values in the Culture Wars MARGARET SOMERVILLE Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2015; xviii + 358 pp.; $34.95 CAD (paperback)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Media studies; Engineering; Art; Sociology; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.02517398959980867,"score_gpt":0.2810436916696092,"score_spread":0.25586970206980053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571866998","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032233815,0.132427,0.0013517236,0.5031206,0.004150788,0.000026818407,0.00018457237,0.0001558686,0.35535926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13380662,0.061001237,0.0015501239,0.0511308,0.0017740085,0.000055659384,0.0001335263,0.00042961517,0.7501185],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857163,0.0006987736,0.000022558408,0.00007559049,0.000383732,0.000247555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826175,0.00063164224,0.000073452284,0.000068877845,0.0003827284,0.00058164954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023136288,0.0004772575,0.0004318492,0.0006887328,0.0084590865,0.007554044,0.0009994817,0.0029994452,0.039416928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00408714,0.00047393265,0.00024934282,0.00095914863,0.01000875,0.0049180095,0.0019141138,0.0041170926,0.0059177442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013377649,0.00000560856,0.00014436884,0.000053383832,0.0000028316338,0.000072854964,0.0052685244,0.000030828556,0.000102155944,0.043529946,0.92870295,0.022073094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003937183,0.000004055358,0.0012334891,0.00025760173,0.000002180632,0.000053825108,0.009518372,0.000036223137,0.00007692023,0.0108187925,0.9779821,0.000012511186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49599507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7326757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49599507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020264221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015546742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9862161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571928272","doi":"","title":"Taking Notice: Judicial Notice and the \"Community Sense\" in Anti-Poverty Litigation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; CONTEST; Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Law; Political science; Judicial opinion; Common law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03160045582974311,"score_gpt":0.3066113124041099,"score_spread":0.27501085657436675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571928272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21663842,0.0052700536,0.025380336,0.19944453,0.0011664113,0.00014091327,0.000034925913,0.00008421035,0.5518402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902265,0.0005160937,0.0009898619,0.004027296,0.00031608166,0.000032618467,0.0000066865555,0.000017889713,0.0038668583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9663441,0.01880826,0.0011971344,0.0023954497,0.006378524,0.0048765657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.959082,0.028387776,0.00469024,0.0022419884,0.002766119,0.002831833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023186771,0.000407336,0.0007532018,0.0036524606,0.02807527,0.023365483,0.003372786,0.017362503,0.0046311426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.069925636,0.00045793448,0.00075691775,0.0031853924,0.07997349,0.020002987,0.018867534,0.012810777,0.00035988033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001531388,0.000029793406,0.0006203823,0.000024187564,0.0000054709553,0.0003637678,0.050699957,0.00014442235,0.000120105906,0.93964714,0.0020632234,0.0062661446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041691772,0.0000474791,0.0015563975,0.0002953184,0.000026686015,0.00037712554,0.06026452,0.0007707295,0.00031182024,0.887635,0.048607923,0.00006527318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022115652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025239833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02807527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010722996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013211534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122624815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572264930","doi":"10.1163/15691330-12341404","title":"Introduction: Between Universal and Culture-specific Interpretations of Human Dignity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Sociology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Universality (dynamical systems); Malleability; Embeddedness; Plea; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Environmental ethics; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.07434333427667514,"score_gpt":0.3649743429081796,"score_spread":0.2906310086315045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572264930","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027388161,0.06315216,0.045764852,0.4436081,0.021510288,0.000087178116,0.00058363384,0.00012790717,0.3977777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8005373,0.037511174,0.020542484,0.07444072,0.021898607,0.00038868387,0.00038205698,0.00016785107,0.04413111],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714714,0.001356546,0.00016942834,0.0006173323,0.0005452736,0.00016439546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98722756,0.010198766,0.0006735629,0.0007847834,0.0007618665,0.00035338936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004658308,0.0005039943,0.000570708,0.0011528657,0.0024271668,0.0063083027,0.0016675092,0.005267692,0.013355406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011284146,0.00018705043,0.0004919413,0.0013078232,0.025734533,0.011286446,0.0049005877,0.008316086,0.0011007871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001805552,0.0000071307145,0.00027793885,0.000166076,0.0000048262127,0.000045436875,0.0030368825,0.000048459133,0.00007966613,0.9739579,0.010873389,0.011484358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006440237,0.000034609915,0.000939886,0.0009283684,0.000009901892,0.00030938958,0.0035238925,0.00023495247,0.0002280989,0.8638872,0.12987491,0.000022448965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007422271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008069505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013355406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020951948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015341232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04467827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2574147565","doi":"","title":"Judging Magic: Can You See the Sleight of Hand?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Michigan Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"MAGIC (telescope); Law; Legislature; White (mutation); Power (physics); Resistance (ecology); Aesthetics; Art; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.02038836810664711,"score_gpt":0.30473595973647216,"score_spread":0.28434759162982504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2574147565","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006120976,0.023702092,0.0012447957,0.7572586,0.009786699,0.000027533637,0.00006113622,0.00016535439,0.20163284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3294175,0.030718533,0.0029650892,0.34861678,0.010441915,0.000099703015,0.00017806263,0.0003570543,0.27720538],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806887,0.0008918139,0.000057424015,0.00019926328,0.00046132976,0.00032135873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948736,0.002008208,0.00026817352,0.00021419005,0.0011846055,0.0014513342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002359103,0.00052813423,0.00046642663,0.0011118656,0.010247262,0.0122029865,0.0011216342,0.0052315984,0.024073927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0154249715,0.0003363416,0.00020840106,0.0006781307,0.014782094,0.0140970815,0.0030307008,0.009746238,0.006804821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033475633,0.000024860283,0.0009080236,0.00008267295,0.000004326996,0.00021771432,0.014864509,0.000017281842,0.0000967442,0.058015775,0.8684262,0.057308294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021269936,0.000031651,0.0012564136,0.00047862725,0.000006389847,0.0003615077,0.057195995,0.00009094099,0.00015731591,0.044872653,0.8954894,0.000037673162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019541802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041900758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024073927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033713179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031275516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08053529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2574328700","doi":"10.1177/1362480616684194","title":"Seeing crime, feeling crime: Visual evidence, emotions, and the prosecution of domestic violence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Criminology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Feeling; Psychology; Temporality; Privilege (computing); Criminology; Femininity; Social psychology; Sociology; Law; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05133130333739893,"score_gpt":0.37341195710441594,"score_spread":0.322080653767017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2574328700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9373204,0.0025065972,0.001906193,0.007926739,0.00014003855,0.000016445423,0.000028730412,0.000021072847,0.050133716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998089,0.00034778463,0.000350026,0.00034948165,0.00002940631,0.0000064636533,0.0000065161503,0.0000072495327,0.00081398967],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982066,0.0012715685,0.000034163928,0.00008786152,0.00023410619,0.0001656895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707437,0.0017544221,0.00059891725,0.00015045165,0.00022010578,0.0002017369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00135157,0.00024229843,0.0001812051,0.0010130106,0.0016114992,0.0054728705,0.00039408845,0.0015530341,0.0028066451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009206543,0.0002460601,0.00019667146,0.00034785416,0.0074080997,0.002683113,0.0030299874,0.001918905,0.0001893762],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033814894,0.00030790365,0.043707874,0.000430074,0.00010633339,0.0020961883,0.8070694,0.00045425515,0.012556289,0.04640963,0.006698098,0.07982575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004515125,0.00047588052,0.122162744,0.0005880289,0.00010940404,0.0039038148,0.79111546,0.001215196,0.0030696746,0.03729331,0.039852686,0.0001686218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001189927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017955515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054728705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006591951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036915034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009389102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2576189532","doi":"10.1017/9781316266151","title":"Criminal Law in Liberal and Fascist Italy","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Reinterpretation; Positivism; Legal culture; Criminal law; Scholarship; Law; Political science; Criminology; Liberalism; Law reform; State (computer science); Sociology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027190836568955302,"score_gpt":0.2444454591731226,"score_spread":0.2172546226041673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2576189532","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21705456,0.019088764,0.00030728994,0.037725933,0.00045621704,0.000022388132,0.000053428328,0.000035406672,0.72525597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9456076,0.006043625,0.00026099972,0.0029960845,0.00047940275,0.000034608463,0.000043845514,0.000015591346,0.044518236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925417,0.00021942335,0.000021344196,0.00006776125,0.00014507894,0.00029226008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994332,0.00014395568,0.00015459929,0.000054665892,0.00005634483,0.00015707762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000792254,0.00023312231,0.0001803044,0.0015165104,0.0043398305,0.0036925373,0.00045991642,0.0011453294,0.002253144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017978718,0.00016222453,0.00018899755,0.0016904242,0.016733715,0.0013402246,0.0025753875,0.0016435715,0.00033433756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033926655,0.000052458505,0.009624293,0.000093105824,0.0000062107583,0.00055687217,0.057760272,0.00024095335,0.00017526187,0.8584538,0.027933044,0.04506968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021040229,0.00007005569,0.12080612,0.00054868567,0.000011022815,0.00079041626,0.013065729,0.000394989,0.00014961229,0.063319325,0.8007895,0.00003347952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021724578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046647634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021724578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008656109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035502429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06280482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580024787","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1479","title":"Book Review: Due Process and Victims' Rights: The New Law and Politics of Criminal Justice, by Kent Roach","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Politics; Criminal justice; Political science; Economic Justice; Criminology; Process (computing); Criminal law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.013062441835550243,"score_gpt":0.29311164960394326,"score_spread":0.28004920776839304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580024787","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010748336,0.81532484,0.00031550444,0.11061617,0.063275695,0.000028632518,0.00014526806,0.000028273445,0.010158136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026044068,0.7272618,0.0004668694,0.087820895,0.08311357,0.00015617762,0.00030672457,0.000102660626,0.09816696],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983236,0.00048483504,0.00012331082,0.00020606589,0.0007580245,0.00010420637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99008685,0.006503552,0.000465598,0.00018317706,0.0024027282,0.00035812805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002387625,0.0015028307,0.0022225343,0.003550209,0.0018486301,0.004819161,0.0024977066,0.009235656,0.016940964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013969406,0.0011109615,0.0007339977,0.0062119155,0.0034990218,0.0060179774,0.001564668,0.008800388,0.008035483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049484433,0.0000041967937,0.000018904306,0.0002473817,0.0000037593388,0.000009101944,0.000023848355,0.000024939909,0.000012203117,0.0015380558,0.98931515,0.00879756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015824347,0.000009539914,0.0002960436,0.001348731,0.000014167171,0.000093212366,0.0000749913,0.0000431076,0.000028454475,0.003519152,0.99454474,0.00001197523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024423197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067189574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024423197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005825823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008101451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05667311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2580209698","doi":"10.1017/s0012217317000063","title":"Fictional Characters, Real Problems: The Search for Ethical Content in Literature GARRY L. HAGBERG (ed.) Oxford University Press, 2016; xii + 389 pp.; $90.00 (hardback)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.05363216317556439,"score_gpt":0.2965883651214937,"score_spread":0.24295620194592932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580209698","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010676808,0.86548,0.0017770334,0.07981431,0.0023182922,0.00003615717,0.00008331004,0.000083503095,0.049339805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025160933,0.91541874,0.0047773793,0.010906451,0.0033683307,0.00015611465,0.00024231727,0.00018391889,0.039785724],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953518,0.003112088,0.00022612707,0.00022860568,0.0009062386,0.00017505755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98297083,0.014916082,0.0006250165,0.00020295514,0.00080154045,0.00048363855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065024025,0.0011143687,0.0013589148,0.007949824,0.0040230206,0.014549916,0.0015157459,0.004752181,0.021144044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017149094,0.00093382306,0.0004999954,0.006812037,0.013698457,0.021498855,0.0043923054,0.0040605464,0.010203645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002466671,0.000023912993,0.00036136582,0.0031042902,0.000018716899,0.00029250275,0.020888716,0.00011448184,0.00017743272,0.1082325,0.59012437,0.27663702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008539504,0.000012656197,0.0010454282,0.012118041,0.000012773794,0.000553371,0.03305943,0.00013068419,0.00013006698,0.13360402,0.81929195,0.000032976503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004243755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008782429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021144044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005197668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060951523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070733845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581109164","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1377","title":"Book Notes: Lawyers and Vampires: Cultural Histories of Legal Professions, W. Wesley Pue and David Sugarman (eds)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.017196733287706358,"score_gpt":0.2974135484086574,"score_spread":0.28021681512095103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581109164","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028202783,0.53258234,0.0020910252,0.14488323,0.00785862,0.00004489756,0.0009237067,0.00014812093,0.3086477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027490018,0.39222828,0.001950622,0.015846958,0.0058606816,0.0000850678,0.0006683895,0.00015193886,0.5557182],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996866,0.00009333995,0.000018321258,0.000041914507,0.00013063797,0.000029227991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832517,0.0010608679,0.00008731694,0.00005695134,0.0002984299,0.00017120136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063064,0.00082323706,0.0005739032,0.002163348,0.0033524781,0.005744459,0.001136274,0.0027062446,0.046458494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018038806,0.0006501563,0.00028161975,0.0053216494,0.0037964405,0.008638067,0.0011040353,0.0030608168,0.014479873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000950396,0.000017651986,0.00024671564,0.00015121378,0.0000029122348,0.00004790448,0.0029728161,0.00008145726,0.00008801164,0.029314885,0.92949265,0.03757429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047406115,0.000007240339,0.0013056304,0.00053590443,0.0000051059947,0.00014535898,0.0050332695,0.000045099347,0.00009395702,0.01583605,0.9769782,0.000009488934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058085974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17630523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058085974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021916337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036510327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15541911},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583248360","doi":"10.1017/9781316681060.002","title":"Legal Pluralism and the Interpretive Limits of Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.023073325451803253,"score_gpt":0.24119948309158037,"score_spread":0.2181261576397771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583248360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007521829,0.024322838,0.011178016,0.043641146,0.0006884711,0.000019595438,0.000048330603,0.00006291158,0.9125168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8229881,0.015698534,0.008320084,0.007927938,0.0023147517,0.00019716677,0.000097968885,0.00021781537,0.14223771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904081,0.0054171374,0.0002724148,0.0007270778,0.0025014775,0.0006738963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99197364,0.005999016,0.0003459568,0.00088924717,0.0005894753,0.00020257768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008000488,0.00051771814,0.0007044342,0.0018911634,0.0054552606,0.01486478,0.0014944003,0.004394089,0.0063256873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012427354,0.000471246,0.0005584767,0.001909556,0.054578897,0.012002898,0.0048834654,0.008816457,0.0012257245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013914106,0.0000019321656,0.0000143341795,0.000013126676,7.272842e-7,0.000015025644,0.0016698353,0.000037625152,0.00001631807,0.9946688,0.0018421914,0.0017187292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028411434,0.0000019766549,0.00004380863,0.00012611068,0.0000014374986,0.000024103378,0.00082359917,0.00014205008,0.00004458211,0.95401305,0.044773553,0.0000029977562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038064898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044748224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01486478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008629888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057543917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0626145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583823992","doi":"10.1017/9781316681060.007","title":"“Existing in the Hyphen”","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Computer science; Content (measure theory); World Wide Web; Computer security","score_opus":0.05950589482857077,"score_gpt":0.26165388351469904,"score_spread":0.20214798868612827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583823992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046683438,0.0053385743,0.002246891,0.005246886,0.002623019,0.000029946474,0.000117236355,0.0001899429,0.9837406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01241215,0.0060101915,0.0019175964,0.0033974329,0.0012552048,0.00005779947,0.00022924143,0.00040043244,0.97431993],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929273,0.00021474871,0.000026363692,0.00011619267,0.0002528021,0.00009714189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995877,0.00012130149,0.000019377001,0.00009210274,0.000112210146,0.000067263674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069537165,0.0006491752,0.00040076673,0.0010812778,0.002441097,0.005256864,0.0010807068,0.0015303988,0.17860621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020137078,0.00028673132,0.0004966377,0.0013084225,0.0037984736,0.009558311,0.0027801371,0.004515698,0.060784534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001802687,0.000023818424,0.00008132057,0.00019767319,0.000003255234,0.00011488662,0.0023595563,0.000036937694,0.00027516534,0.3770287,0.5298742,0.08998651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010642618,0.0000048805846,0.00005942572,0.00014919692,0.0000011022712,0.000072527095,0.00032949448,0.000019177598,0.00007364436,0.009424164,0.9898628,0.0000026325615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020853004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00476108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17860621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017654855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014148692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59749734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2584885622","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1393","title":"Book Review: Lessons of Everyday Law/Le Droit du Quotidien, by Roderick A. Macdonald","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.011651128476517676,"score_gpt":0.2627608430605477,"score_spread":0.25110971458403003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2584885622","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032607032,0.7843827,0.00023517846,0.13623732,0.016514083,0.00002489948,0.00025194444,0.000056459307,0.061971415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009692715,0.66374654,0.0006676161,0.05788532,0.018158434,0.000092423674,0.0003666299,0.00014484758,0.24924551],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989556,0.0002834216,0.00006360898,0.00011706716,0.0005164635,0.00006376812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962173,0.0018722418,0.00020579435,0.00015460615,0.0012306315,0.00031944775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014485064,0.0005850925,0.00072875636,0.0026642606,0.0023508563,0.006405881,0.0011458708,0.0021540667,0.018462762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00802634,0.00044314683,0.00024222916,0.0048802737,0.0023508754,0.003646096,0.001304567,0.0034113342,0.00843772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023542932,0.000002747774,0.000031155356,0.00018479783,0.00000138714,0.000019995314,0.00022069996,0.000014374517,0.000013645051,0.003662684,0.9772101,0.018636134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011771041,0.000001810628,0.00014485548,0.0004525275,0.000001389666,0.00004000616,0.00017818039,0.00000561738,0.000005983161,0.00080772326,0.9983584,0.0000023074424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.086976685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23699343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086976685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076051136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013314902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17294085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585227310","doi":"10.29173/mlj996","title":"Reforming and Resisting Criminal Law: Criminal Justice and the Tragically Hip","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Berkeley Charitable Foundation","keywords":"Imprisonment; Law; Normative; Innocence; Criminal law; Criminal justice; Life imprisonment; Presumption of innocence; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Economic Justice; Prison","score_opus":0.05369862219326976,"score_gpt":0.3150750480870547,"score_spread":0.26137642589378496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585227310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41772082,0.012024868,0.0019230545,0.20784335,0.0015867908,0.00004292152,0.000039953648,0.000049541457,0.35876858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95311,0.00230612,0.0004180709,0.009705689,0.00020594594,0.00001529746,0.000010244638,0.000020504962,0.034208022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827206,0.0006525499,0.000024504892,0.000082599974,0.00037783984,0.0005903872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873024,0.00027277487,0.00013867924,0.00006851608,0.0002103467,0.0005793807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016210921,0.0003116457,0.00023410613,0.0011853905,0.019736372,0.0074318685,0.0007620901,0.0026421908,0.0027017915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022122937,0.0001689191,0.00011462615,0.0006920185,0.03787803,0.0032577778,0.0043784208,0.0044752834,0.0003186651],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036183268,0.000067648005,0.005407429,0.0000665219,0.000007805772,0.0011074551,0.39466226,0.00011773327,0.00075609836,0.5392156,0.023114484,0.03544077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016497916,0.00007766787,0.011647456,0.00030522645,0.000013017238,0.00076832855,0.37638214,0.00018450472,0.00075937976,0.042066935,0.56773424,0.000044580498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17404094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38313577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8259591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012664162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01070618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3460558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585247787","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3028","title":"Book Review: Being and Owning: The Body, Bodily Material, and the Law by Jesse Wall","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Presumption; Property (philosophy); Judgement; Dead body; Common law; Philosophy; Sociology; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0071555416355826365,"score_gpt":0.2499600207986917,"score_spread":0.24280447916310907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585247787","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011662115,0.93107265,0.00012655016,0.02691104,0.014157599,0.000011419183,0.00008443051,0.000011576399,0.027508143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026816411,0.88240725,0.00019010669,0.02344719,0.01834776,0.000045216046,0.00013531976,0.0000389407,0.07270661],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993511,0.00016137004,0.00004206913,0.00008340863,0.00032049417,0.000041593757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998355,0.0010468527,0.00010465173,0.000048433565,0.0003285041,0.000116594005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061995443,0.00091856206,0.0010533599,0.0025628058,0.0013847584,0.0032011017,0.001282126,0.003860051,0.022965379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031139173,0.00043471606,0.0003398951,0.0039388705,0.0033058755,0.0035900187,0.0013539721,0.004748268,0.012440932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059901586,0.000010599078,0.000044295823,0.0006489733,0.0000047314484,0.00003385933,0.00010903596,0.00004217834,0.000030199377,0.0076453052,0.961255,0.030169696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030859774,0.000006029255,0.00027383014,0.0018723677,0.0000031459847,0.00016278095,0.00008806055,0.000010736414,0.00001191236,0.0019434445,0.99561936,0.000005272956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013775581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037785824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022965379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030784793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004220988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07682681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585710083","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.013.382","title":"Honor Ideology, Dueling Culture, and Judicial Lies in 1920s Uruguay","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Latin American History","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Ideology; Law; Newspaper; Journalism; Narrative; Communism; Political science; Sociology; Art; Literature; Politics","score_opus":0.05054764036049015,"score_gpt":0.34850792047735174,"score_spread":0.2979602801168616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585710083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9773352,0.0018877103,0.00009049084,0.0032446398,0.00008850055,0.000016094815,0.00002533896,0.0000061653527,0.017305836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971464,0.0001956388,0.000031775016,0.00017994977,0.00002372137,0.000007471026,0.000007170003,0.000005666965,0.002402159],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968208,0.0016025072,0.00013021365,0.00027902456,0.00024139803,0.0009260495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968617,0.00094210944,0.00069538807,0.0001616875,0.0005203852,0.0008187367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004204661,0.00030028465,0.0006538433,0.0014260793,0.025366478,0.0056689405,0.0012399512,0.001575203,0.00427389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060721035,0.00046043823,0.00017433558,0.0011938467,0.0115717165,0.0018143954,0.0051134652,0.003635311,0.00026471165],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005243299,0.00008978825,0.020775728,0.000066127206,0.000012293151,0.0013614299,0.9328359,0.000029251232,0.00095478736,0.033713795,0.0018883079,0.008220212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011385734,0.00013655293,0.11544722,0.00031483045,0.000015347883,0.0005064415,0.8010794,0.00015590122,0.0006321048,0.0023194724,0.079313524,0.00006782209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15539692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25752258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15539692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010143129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026657765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30898488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586862425","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v27i1.4569","title":"Peter Fitzpatrick, Law as Resistance: Modernism, Imperialism, Legalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legalism (Western philosophy); Resistance (ecology); Modernism (music); Law; Product (mathematics); Philosophy; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Art history; Art; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.03222374480642907,"score_gpt":0.34539891031431935,"score_spread":0.31317516550789026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586862425","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028960076,0.51286167,0.0017445061,0.32388267,0.0029402208,0.000033819586,0.000120436125,0.00004875805,0.155472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18047647,0.5438681,0.0030157848,0.068540886,0.01100187,0.0001998756,0.0001649121,0.00013485739,0.19259723],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992539,0.0002960595,0.000036731057,0.000093574905,0.00024363899,0.000076089134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986047,0.0009682186,0.00013623374,0.000053194337,0.00013303779,0.000104640676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010025469,0.00054000487,0.00033583082,0.0014295963,0.0033814027,0.004763785,0.0009831673,0.0038091394,0.006454306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030206535,0.00043010607,0.00023833303,0.0022038019,0.009198747,0.01122439,0.0015335951,0.0044526136,0.0015736672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028119588,0.00003808588,0.00040747353,0.00027639937,0.0000137006555,0.00018766902,0.0060532885,0.00013141088,0.00015092346,0.47263843,0.48896345,0.031110898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018976078,0.00001444227,0.0025078256,0.0006305103,0.000009421401,0.000242822,0.0058412347,0.0001325892,0.00021886257,0.27435553,0.7160037,0.0000240527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012365951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024929872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012365951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026589863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022063442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02458793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592714842","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i2.4842","title":"RECONCILIATION IN TRANSLATION: INDIGENOUS LEGAL TRADITIONS AND CANADA’S TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry","keywords":"Indigenous; Commission; Mainstream; Sensibility; Law; Sociology; Political science; State (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.0643599226041288,"score_gpt":0.32993196547455506,"score_spread":0.26557204287042624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592714842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053530194,0.01686735,0.0059963684,0.43756363,0.003192975,0.000119675205,0.00024580193,0.00017509505,0.48230886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87632114,0.0060873213,0.005591415,0.030320203,0.00053498766,0.00007315911,0.00014479623,0.00018667054,0.080740295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822973,0.0054525863,0.0005633979,0.0010642568,0.0065127388,0.0041097766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785009,0.007693701,0.0007301372,0.0014922126,0.008908323,0.0026748425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016032418,0.00034247557,0.0004858238,0.0025538674,0.042930055,0.020670995,0.00247431,0.006198351,0.0061702523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030594513,0.0003505183,0.00047954926,0.005070998,0.034409076,0.007864561,0.009341166,0.009662265,0.00047439325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023434752,0.000019887699,0.0010006297,0.000106168976,0.000008072809,0.00066757586,0.14551437,0.00024268207,0.00014997392,0.74799806,0.06743421,0.03683493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001896648,0.000014424299,0.00370931,0.00062157004,0.000018170247,0.00025735868,0.09066053,0.00067178585,0.00049947837,0.08709192,0.81633717,0.000099388046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9584866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12374852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12374852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28367043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89786255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594671183","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2017v42n1a3253","title":"Droit et communication : liaisons constatées. Réflexions sur la relation entre la communication et le droit","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026988176973187557,"score_gpt":0.30267024572577667,"score_spread":0.2756820687525891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594671183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057925943,0.039090194,0.005284167,0.34271657,0.0020625135,0.00002154605,0.00012707437,0.000041432355,0.55273056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513395,0.010585508,0.00056706363,0.011707417,0.0010562646,0.00003182451,0.000023007178,0.000047304875,0.024642125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99243903,0.0049770926,0.00021821342,0.0005775907,0.0011977494,0.0005903444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731213,0.021881163,0.001842578,0.00068012363,0.001918515,0.0005563191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006870705,0.00044525214,0.0004210197,0.0018770064,0.00877915,0.013463392,0.0015001455,0.009642177,0.01009111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026554268,0.00032810032,0.0003615037,0.002872121,0.036081985,0.016901517,0.0055789994,0.01053672,0.0008673134],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026571417,0.000009001412,0.0005656753,0.00007443417,0.000005928704,0.0004403239,0.09698395,0.000050495677,0.00008449511,0.887775,0.007972103,0.006011963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039142764,0.000038799684,0.004826416,0.0013293572,0.000034263598,0.0016131708,0.26525858,0.00037204404,0.0005166992,0.326695,0.39919323,0.00008335386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037266903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028317645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037266903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007271849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006556626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07409996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595581606","doi":"","title":"Nationhood Interrupted: Revitalizing Nêhiyaw Legal Systems","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of native studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Kinship; Genocide; Sociology; Law; Political science; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.1422831766023701,"score_gpt":0.3822847057175225,"score_spread":0.24000152911515238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595581606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12731756,0.065999046,0.0064377054,0.18348728,0.0066916426,0.00033836986,0.00010624558,0.00017785272,0.6094444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64057565,0.04078835,0.007665048,0.027591113,0.0006285695,0.0004289023,0.00016900465,0.0002405621,0.2819128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826896,0.00073875027,0.0000529897,0.000098723154,0.0002550107,0.00058559544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875426,0.000548579,0.00010412691,0.00015323468,0.00014290797,0.00029687307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046782307,0.0003852691,0.00035551997,0.0007118128,0.014148309,0.008519991,0.0023224265,0.005034506,0.011251254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042008352,0.0004281315,0.00037611835,0.000967626,0.016553968,0.01365902,0.011216603,0.0076238,0.0011480652],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033279768,0.00007026043,0.0008747776,0.00033684765,0.000008297565,0.001535795,0.28041616,0.00018116782,0.00067119644,0.563858,0.08774286,0.06427143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011627434,0.000033533808,0.0013912527,0.00064435037,0.0000050625104,0.00027662914,0.10915763,0.00008969279,0.000312116,0.027038211,0.86101806,0.000021844977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0396536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09489696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9603464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011868182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020823114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086110055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2596885110","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1101","title":"Book Notes: Lawscape: Property, Environment, Law, by Nicole Graham","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01099974332413645,"score_gpt":0.2463093802572217,"score_spread":0.23530963693308526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2596885110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049620616,0.17165534,0.0019466658,0.28381896,0.014049826,0.0000522797,0.00041126285,0.00019088919,0.52737856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006680696,0.05352232,0.0012291219,0.04122407,0.0047608623,0.000074403484,0.00014918357,0.00020335244,0.89215595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995358,0.00010434782,0.000019397348,0.000080899015,0.00021916642,0.00004048403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998995,0.00057460443,0.000040258165,0.000058930687,0.00023666906,0.00009461305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089574157,0.00078782736,0.00066490687,0.0018938694,0.00449763,0.005543423,0.0011050923,0.0060857567,0.035361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002776595,0.00068920513,0.00031819605,0.0027617444,0.005543439,0.009384275,0.0018332343,0.008056464,0.013363645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002319964,0.0000046576197,0.000030706007,0.000031643736,6.1099917e-7,0.000011389615,0.00019172068,0.000034474244,0.0000149007155,0.046972156,0.9445932,0.008112229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002071612,0.000002174711,0.00011669132,0.00013623122,0.0000010293357,0.0000265993,0.00032182594,0.00002863623,0.000019539539,0.014631612,0.9847082,0.000005395443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091970354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24056883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091970354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00572676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005991707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18287003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2598035519","doi":"","title":"Justice and the Colonial Collision: Reflections on Stories of Intercultural Encounter in Law, Literature, Sculpture and Film","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sculpture; Colonialism; Economic Justice; Collision; Law; Sociology; Political science; Aesthetics; Art; Visual arts; Computer science","score_opus":0.03852431662177366,"score_gpt":0.33500033304958876,"score_spread":0.29647601642781507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2598035519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5940906,0.013816169,0.0036765556,0.10668337,0.0024380311,0.00013237285,0.00017804696,0.00013571503,0.27884918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97785896,0.002299014,0.00041741531,0.004129237,0.00028653484,0.00004472798,0.000025460653,0.00024186456,0.0146967685],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98731345,0.009108698,0.0002206704,0.00058323104,0.0009462687,0.0018276563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852202,0.011088848,0.0008731051,0.0005554654,0.0006994929,0.0015629007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077412063,0.001148652,0.0012169877,0.0030510635,0.05848777,0.024797512,0.0028354914,0.007939274,0.006160415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028934224,0.0013527914,0.0008280685,0.0034387317,0.07617045,0.019248273,0.020678602,0.020689942,0.0006883027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013030881,0.0000071403065,0.0001549605,0.00002507343,0.0000033525648,0.0008599808,0.985974,0.000013231368,0.000085122636,0.010090244,0.001908161,0.00086554827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004449572,0.000010016169,0.00034950918,0.00015924148,0.0000066268785,0.0007270225,0.92750823,0.000035382353,0.00015168882,0.0024431446,0.06858792,0.000016715258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044415724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07451392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05848777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0124002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005148208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08997011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602386290","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2852887","title":"Law in the Present Tense: Continuity and Tradition InnThe Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"History; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.012787796776541311,"score_gpt":0.29423718032491497,"score_spread":0.2814493835483737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602386290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6519585,0.0063182474,0.00077159604,0.048385866,0.00019717275,0.00007608374,0.00006880375,0.000015990265,0.29220772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679166,0.0006365698,0.0001664427,0.002019908,0.000025809366,0.000024432276,0.000008082259,0.000011467395,0.029190537],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995538,0.0013575256,0.00011504097,0.000314499,0.0006411277,0.0020338849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950324,0.0022884803,0.00041196827,0.00027428925,0.0007002321,0.0012926271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043248874,0.00013236141,0.0004070365,0.00077671773,0.032452468,0.007830542,0.0019146602,0.00471353,0.0067063533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01249906,0.0006033128,0.0002375089,0.0012447134,0.015968995,0.004461193,0.005501959,0.009105416,0.0002330123],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006126423,0.00006025796,0.0053464165,0.0001115354,0.000011503108,0.0008640717,0.63292223,0.000082658575,0.0005193241,0.33864188,0.006262124,0.015116818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024435527,0.0001059167,0.029629886,0.00078361103,0.00006182457,0.00050886534,0.7428161,0.00034938764,0.00052071764,0.034012735,0.19109538,0.000091129055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.706793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9034238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.706793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02197161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03874138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5898675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602983245","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4810","title":"DECOLONIZING AND INDIGENIZING: SOME CONSIDERATIONS FOR LAW SCHOOLS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Humanities; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10028188575883995,"score_gpt":0.3877295488309621,"score_spread":0.28744766307212216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602983245","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009808677,0.009705669,0.001593604,0.93707824,0.0011121007,0.000044526932,0.00001448016,0.00004059764,0.040602174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5396914,0.015272255,0.00782074,0.39041677,0.001884873,0.0003156574,0.000048341273,0.00015614013,0.044393864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97992676,0.009714059,0.000600248,0.000929591,0.003079839,0.0057495884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98029685,0.008718337,0.00082881196,0.00084044837,0.004091273,0.005224346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016383072,0.0005322024,0.00088524004,0.00176256,0.031842895,0.023108825,0.005396443,0.02320616,0.005770956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021173742,0.00049451535,0.0010143777,0.001721554,0.07293083,0.019234622,0.0136641795,0.026865829,0.0006214935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012843935,0.00009407553,0.0016068438,0.00019588445,0.0000053674207,0.0004636123,0.052148666,0.0001498509,0.00017378962,0.8847041,0.036806006,0.023638893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039903156,0.00010156108,0.003599752,0.0020762542,0.000022090146,0.0005996933,0.19727404,0.0003165763,0.00047245025,0.21999782,0.57540894,0.00009094054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3060815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50620747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3060815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033513594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09821521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6085998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604092280","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i1.4806","title":"FOREWORD BY GUEST EDITOR: INDIGENOUS LAW, LANDS, AND LITERATURE","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Political science; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.01924456307684295,"score_gpt":0.3286395495800958,"score_spread":0.3093949865032528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604092280","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000045731478,0.009242234,0.000045487464,0.14750762,0.8387373,0.00001282086,0.000057181194,0.000020492678,0.0043310765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009689966,0.007918988,0.0000943879,0.09901679,0.8523668,0.00004132706,0.000046627243,0.000063312065,0.039482746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774337,0.00044160246,0.0002822689,0.00032396195,0.0009433942,0.00026537685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98485744,0.005573377,0.0008980668,0.00048293415,0.006205324,0.0019829816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00388697,0.0018952643,0.0022930608,0.003752304,0.0053176675,0.009134269,0.0033884337,0.01200765,0.030703647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019365074,0.000787287,0.00091400347,0.0026196176,0.0029060359,0.007260464,0.004189509,0.017195387,0.016160848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032262058,0.00000315047,0.000013592151,0.00005386315,0.0000012219153,0.000025325595,0.00003326346,0.0000030678136,0.000008105956,0.00040539488,0.99775994,0.0016897245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061220694,0.0000054969432,0.00020095281,0.00043959366,0.000006134629,0.00009116852,0.00028842152,0.000019420842,0.000025715384,0.0005833714,0.9983261,0.0000073948936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00651066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017458934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9934893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003152476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045110025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10271388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604272297","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1123","title":"Book Notes: Impersonations: Troubling the Person in Law and Culture, by Sheryl N. Hamilton","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.015573472169901627,"score_gpt":0.2763528463870587,"score_spread":0.2607793742171571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604272297","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014308587,0.06356368,0.0011753256,0.8012469,0.0075030252,0.000026194823,0.000104601386,0.000052323365,0.12489698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07309357,0.08769268,0.0020608816,0.3339005,0.007837238,0.000122035264,0.000097553566,0.00019625633,0.49499932],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989411,0.0004202856,0.00002776796,0.00010266561,0.0004086177,0.00009961696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756706,0.0016826879,0.0000849351,0.000080343256,0.00038414853,0.0002008755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017202221,0.00049616006,0.00034721158,0.000833434,0.008141372,0.0055527864,0.0012452377,0.0057038656,0.011751477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054201144,0.0005020689,0.00022614936,0.0011485629,0.012007221,0.009771162,0.0019357299,0.007358333,0.0021175838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035329588,0.000004434244,0.00010652574,0.000032890985,0.0000011428773,0.00005810448,0.0024226864,0.000026400787,0.000033079315,0.05982096,0.9302248,0.0072655194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064842047,0.0000057002426,0.00044846637,0.00024927346,0.0000032283585,0.00011903898,0.009762406,0.000057615336,0.00008302814,0.038178753,0.95107317,0.000012756624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13689752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38748285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13689752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059874123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008855257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27220136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604633643","doi":"10.1017/s1744552315000178","title":"Refashioning vagrancy: a tale of Law's narrative of its imagination","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Vagrancy; Narrative; Sociology; Constitution; Relation (database); Law; Aesthetics; Criminology; Political science; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.040597409719370196,"score_gpt":0.35926888372387034,"score_spread":0.31867147400450013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604633643","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2020689,0.0059606866,0.02179171,0.101445556,0.0018299576,0.00007454703,0.000098976016,0.00022342485,0.66650623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98439884,0.0005423208,0.0007228006,0.0016665201,0.00016823136,0.000029350718,0.00001593426,0.00009082328,0.01236506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993194,0.0048984643,0.00008528477,0.00046296528,0.0007618375,0.00059739174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947831,0.0037106744,0.00028512496,0.00041770298,0.0004302859,0.00037317118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056105764,0.00078638794,0.0004950999,0.0026107857,0.0150060905,0.017074984,0.0020547397,0.004792758,0.0038180996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011220099,0.00037249882,0.0004474822,0.0011164406,0.09991802,0.014335535,0.008010873,0.010746887,0.0004288034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001352805,0.00001354938,0.00010545884,0.000020053927,0.0000014206353,0.00020311175,0.22772825,0.00007661495,0.0001402429,0.76732033,0.0025015026,0.0018760357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022531462,0.000055246142,0.00038188064,0.00034767878,0.000008360822,0.00041859105,0.34906107,0.0009072705,0.0006427048,0.32218483,0.32592246,0.00004738156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010243834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009228503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017074984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010305037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031694209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0747686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604938845","doi":"","title":"Queering Indigenous Legal Studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Queer; Humanities; Indigenous; Human sexuality; Political science; Sociology; Ethnology; Gender studies; Art","score_opus":0.04060658794367863,"score_gpt":0.316388461397674,"score_spread":0.2757818734539954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604938845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25074935,0.042154048,0.0074650203,0.20406342,0.002976952,0.00013503476,0.000058294754,0.00007968943,0.49231827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93182486,0.021212641,0.0034082537,0.010196954,0.001135216,0.00013077051,0.000026065256,0.000043133157,0.032022033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907837,0.006164865,0.00020576415,0.0005192658,0.0011538311,0.0011725369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97958905,0.01259184,0.0011752079,0.0015541576,0.0023720842,0.0027176298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01642891,0.00029156066,0.00042094523,0.0026824037,0.026471317,0.009498141,0.0015741932,0.0028432044,0.0063996236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023663545,0.00023945708,0.00026705294,0.002018917,0.03292269,0.013581428,0.010346085,0.006071649,0.00038737088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011229267,0.000055078122,0.002192283,0.0001810586,0.000007557834,0.00032282295,0.4154105,0.000059028018,0.00033726473,0.53800607,0.006899703,0.036517393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062201875,0.000045346467,0.004424601,0.0015364136,0.000022675125,0.00027390814,0.43132633,0.00016050156,0.0005536435,0.2016585,0.35996437,0.000027472879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028525738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06783415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028525738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009536969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013544867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08688539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605927581","doi":"","title":"Human Rights Film Festivals: Activism in Context by Sonia M. Tascón (review)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Film Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Movie theater; Dictatorship; Context (archaeology); Media studies; Scholarship; Exhibition; Sociology; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Art; Visual arts; Democracy; Politics; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06411358818852737,"score_gpt":0.3470404489136353,"score_spread":0.2829268607251079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605927581","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000044961744,0.9944331,0.00001903729,0.003496809,0.0012017364,0.000009233238,0.000009925298,0.0000024588635,0.00078271446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010156141,0.99153954,0.00006188548,0.004230251,0.0019322835,0.000060733037,0.000031424548,0.000006771503,0.0011214209],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985885,0.00060878485,0.00014938737,0.00018806137,0.00034657223,0.000118751654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954731,0.0024706593,0.00069845933,0.000072084345,0.0009317867,0.00035383622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029157405,0.0011813422,0.0012575598,0.0028957124,0.0009747187,0.004408386,0.0015280545,0.0025626095,0.009215533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007913552,0.000587576,0.00077803776,0.004128642,0.0015764431,0.0048073726,0.0023033053,0.0045295777,0.003450343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006515242,0.000047696496,0.0003236962,0.029405719,0.00010017633,0.00010093429,0.0014144403,0.000070673064,0.00014549225,0.0032611834,0.61120063,0.35386413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029822977,0.000049980536,0.0016101544,0.044742618,0.00009529237,0.0004054689,0.0012264915,0.000028710167,0.000065294735,0.0005868688,0.95113444,0.000024876716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0082836235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013261646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009215533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022234311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004486674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030829012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607397021","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v26i2.4551","title":"Oren Ben-Dor, Thinking About Law: In Silence with Heidegger","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Relation (database); Economic Justice; Socratic method; Hebrew; Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Linguistics; Aesthetics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03537546077903161,"score_gpt":0.3137322866426292,"score_spread":0.2783568258635976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607397021","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00097294344,0.25923538,0.0012331138,0.68355876,0.012986697,0.00002968248,0.00009472269,0.00006544526,0.041823287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044733718,0.15975194,0.0032745672,0.6005579,0.015471218,0.00020242971,0.000112119174,0.0005078278,0.17538826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968836,0.0016968024,0.00012752412,0.0003785939,0.0006924578,0.00022106786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99573517,0.0031086688,0.0001898612,0.000120409386,0.00046192776,0.00038399236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046476815,0.0008958166,0.0007308926,0.0010921427,0.007408594,0.006119132,0.002042895,0.009875205,0.010628597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010407774,0.0006741372,0.00036381095,0.0014685609,0.0125669,0.015422496,0.003066488,0.012228165,0.0047661774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026534184,0.000020799527,0.00013374399,0.00013188588,0.000005524782,0.000113941845,0.008494531,0.000034992503,0.00007420364,0.06500991,0.9068848,0.019069137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013317772,0.000008359815,0.00037776676,0.0005067217,0.0000033165763,0.0001418763,0.0062208,0.00004027526,0.00012774926,0.028827244,0.9637028,0.000029801091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037498575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08629014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037498575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003952917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036636093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07456058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607419353","doi":"10.3968/9400","title":"Becky Sharp’s Identity Pursuit in Vanity Fair From Lacan’s Theory of Mirror Stage","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Psychoanalysis; Aesthetics; Identity crisis; Ideal (ethics); Psychology of self; Realism; Self; Psychology; Sociology; Art; Philosophy; Literature; Social psychology; Epistemology; Personality","score_opus":0.04205301258378799,"score_gpt":0.3324058178062611,"score_spread":0.2903528052224731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607419353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07663694,0.00551022,0.021477578,0.03428215,0.00073779095,0.000090013615,0.000052434018,0.000049428207,0.8611634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94291675,0.000787816,0.0026348748,0.0018022044,0.00011792022,0.000044351007,0.000016676162,0.000035112855,0.05164429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846554,0.0007601094,0.00003235177,0.00020051832,0.00027673773,0.0002647617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994097,0.00022232792,0.00006379333,0.00006120686,0.0001408618,0.000102189086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014079765,0.00040685516,0.00022742123,0.00092721626,0.008420316,0.006818573,0.00060186064,0.0020888746,0.003606134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024165474,0.00025808957,0.0003827729,0.00053581677,0.018215569,0.0054356703,0.0035795032,0.0039314562,0.0005061156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008056596,0.000006211694,0.000106083855,0.000007838625,8.904738e-7,0.00009052691,0.012059963,0.000039097966,0.000051317886,0.9847291,0.001511834,0.0013891348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001449109,0.00003120163,0.00050491333,0.00010995759,0.0000066407392,0.0002852439,0.015707951,0.0005314421,0.00032134456,0.8504924,0.13197005,0.000024417768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013989374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013915015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013989374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076000053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026562384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055142164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610577014","doi":"","title":"Cinderella Story? The Social Production Of A Forensic “Science”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Forensic science; Podiatrist; Podiatry; Underpinning; Field (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Psychology; Criminology; Engineering; Medicine; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.058472717729863725,"score_gpt":0.33204418717878487,"score_spread":0.27357146944892113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610577014","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033843666,0.010393695,0.00074043736,0.9222239,0.0073088272,0.000008264911,0.00004808751,0.000049282924,0.055843066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35244963,0.019875718,0.0017301532,0.50665,0.01971253,0.00007467105,0.00012272176,0.00027696392,0.099107586],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901101,0.006476895,0.00017661613,0.0009819332,0.0015912493,0.0006632375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98562235,0.008334747,0.0010218244,0.0014673322,0.0018662476,0.0016874748],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009559882,0.000752646,0.000749854,0.0020020104,0.022024468,0.016556809,0.0019440361,0.011485926,0.013686066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028176937,0.00036012454,0.00039388073,0.0013992963,0.0668713,0.014534903,0.00994311,0.017687112,0.0030934233],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016994381,0.000012918218,0.00048038148,0.00005889426,0.000013438023,0.00050179183,0.036595546,0.000040548486,0.0000692273,0.40430933,0.5410982,0.016802823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051886946,0.000010113991,0.0002924503,0.0002591332,0.000003867832,0.0004335387,0.019904362,0.000046347574,0.00007559539,0.047127362,0.9318225,0.000019549463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01488261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018294612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97797555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007975716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056600748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057868123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610873493","doi":"10.7202/1107321ar","title":"GRAND ANGLE SUR LA PHOTOGRAPHIE ET LA LOI. UN PRÉCIS SUR LE DROIT DE LA PHOTOGRAPHIE AU QUÉBEC ET AU CANADA","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.006822154044263141,"score_gpt":0.20405199589586773,"score_spread":0.19722984185160458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610873493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004169422,0.21502605,0.0015343054,0.11143235,0.01397871,0.000071363946,0.0028603417,0.00024206546,0.6506853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09836725,0.10001343,0.0025154517,0.0140114715,0.0028805838,0.000062400715,0.0013958762,0.00029725957,0.78045636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642795,0.00043353613,0.000098587516,0.00031724293,0.0020353731,0.0006873099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934115,0.0006498708,0.00023374787,0.00033364558,0.004559838,0.00081141014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021032607,0.000904162,0.00047071624,0.0029405975,0.009049768,0.0065823565,0.0010949794,0.0024399976,0.06902846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00528168,0.00048047167,0.00048098472,0.003536288,0.0059376764,0.0032614,0.0024220287,0.004472947,0.008413999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033433014,0.000008738857,0.00095214735,0.00021064082,0.00000869975,0.00014010415,0.0015464335,0.00005335208,0.00044947074,0.030151445,0.9105319,0.055913746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025664992,0.0000043338496,0.0042834016,0.0002208904,0.0000042219363,0.000055054854,0.00089251366,0.000011415037,0.00013651793,0.0005660235,0.993807,0.000015941554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9564109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9841218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06902846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0437459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04205032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31740022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612319619","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198794356.013.5","title":"Literary Analysis of Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Character (mathematics); Plot (graphics); Sedition; Representation (politics); Focus (optics); Gray (unit); Computer science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027237250115466252,"score_gpt":0.24203334481975242,"score_spread":0.21479609470428618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612319619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021476287,0.018648116,0.005969278,0.011399751,0.0011284299,0.00002705249,0.00023893909,0.00011011074,0.9410022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83002126,0.014610051,0.0028011303,0.0015925467,0.0017362817,0.000069672365,0.00039467492,0.00036394162,0.14841051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987703,0.0006818745,0.000044238313,0.00012120426,0.0003086679,0.00007367531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997074,0.0020684511,0.00013560371,0.0003451009,0.00028653094,0.00009026257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011188718,0.00046380525,0.00035782397,0.0037778802,0.0027628753,0.007480053,0.00070930226,0.001043288,0.014867386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004290418,0.00011990621,0.0002117674,0.002598815,0.013948271,0.0050762813,0.002140841,0.00177628,0.0016002184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012733676,0.000013269168,0.00023382083,0.00015398297,0.0000048710654,0.00017012336,0.029592475,0.00017921205,0.0002657744,0.9270856,0.02058383,0.021704378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035759085,0.000014970108,0.00071453035,0.0007694793,0.000003984842,0.0002801826,0.01789902,0.00046953495,0.0005127605,0.16737421,0.81194985,0.000007836788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011744591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014196857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014867386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036316966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008355197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04973638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612852119","doi":"10.1080/02722011.2017.1323826","title":"Karen Busby, Adam Muller, and Andrew Woolford, <i>The Idea of a Human Rights Museum</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Art; Art history; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04622259225430772,"score_gpt":0.36080078121969644,"score_spread":0.3145781889653887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612852119","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00072799594,0.28730544,0.00049173384,0.6653239,0.017167885,0.000028371096,0.00020967482,0.000034257864,0.0287108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042006526,0.4639547,0.0017569942,0.35304973,0.012619478,0.00019075,0.0004493932,0.00021145193,0.12576094],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962521,0.0011569632,0.00015188825,0.00038372286,0.0016506185,0.0004047365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884632,0.0069171777,0.0006510748,0.00019325981,0.0028505824,0.00092468766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044221007,0.00076851697,0.00046240035,0.0027217087,0.008679234,0.009937446,0.0023195469,0.0060151485,0.009709778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016348315,0.00050924387,0.0004046093,0.0036602307,0.0101746945,0.012350993,0.0025380733,0.0092360005,0.0027612033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074133004,0.0000044243875,0.00014523102,0.00025223423,0.0000048613897,0.00002549658,0.002011469,0.000020097932,0.000030877884,0.031508137,0.95933294,0.006656794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067754713,0.000003805559,0.0012079069,0.0009476007,0.000008015834,0.000046913457,0.006739889,0.000018339959,0.00009295867,0.011673281,0.97922575,0.00002867084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25846446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46613342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25846446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012444882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022589544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51392007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613997998","doi":"","title":"Narratives of Criminal Procedure from Doyle to Chandler to Burke","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Curiosity; Persuasion; Legal writing; Reading (process); Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Aesthetics; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Literature; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Art; Visual arts; Computer science","score_opus":0.0501103916443367,"score_gpt":0.40021430683932613,"score_spread":0.3501039151949894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613997998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08148023,0.03230135,0.0037234984,0.22300902,0.0035699694,0.000081425256,0.00017469053,0.0001027462,0.6555571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7497933,0.011447677,0.0012944143,0.0203054,0.0004975815,0.00012378585,0.00007446332,0.00022323674,0.21624014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715936,0.0016881109,0.00006106439,0.00025498684,0.00041430368,0.0004222087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687576,0.0017202157,0.00030223274,0.00018848115,0.0003381994,0.00057508424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020396847,0.00046718126,0.0003284922,0.00092451775,0.019149708,0.009011916,0.0010529537,0.0038397834,0.006675562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00864981,0.00035144045,0.00015783428,0.00081643264,0.022741856,0.0070424527,0.0060496232,0.008124198,0.0016209655],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049994338,0.000027649547,0.00023536399,0.00008202923,0.0000036816068,0.0012342887,0.39141557,0.00007845122,0.0002757809,0.48226783,0.11018836,0.014140991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036752565,0.000013753082,0.00031101776,0.00030998682,0.0000018832895,0.00058765506,0.09511187,0.000030067238,0.00024594957,0.020060213,0.8833059,0.00001781345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041797087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05877319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041797087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010412283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004867216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08310765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2617796283","doi":"10.7202/1039832ar","title":"“Seeing Law in Terms of Music” A Short Essay on Affinities between Music and Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; Parallels; Subject (documents); Law; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Order (exchange); Affinities; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.026468127414046642,"score_gpt":0.2719475065245917,"score_spread":0.24547937911054507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2617796283","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009525637,0.13169315,0.0072518294,0.41879797,0.020660713,0.00004520169,0.00008713194,0.00006968954,0.4118687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55596393,0.08785827,0.0038092476,0.074318126,0.0415235,0.00011077981,0.00013942408,0.00015662737,0.23612015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847835,0.00083080877,0.000041837666,0.00017184633,0.00036481107,0.00011243516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729437,0.0019864852,0.00015315216,0.00009685447,0.00031811374,0.00015099488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014540858,0.00050372095,0.00024628732,0.0010903084,0.003922015,0.004730392,0.0007860527,0.0035563342,0.005158385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005618033,0.00021187405,0.0003209243,0.00100046,0.014926704,0.006588317,0.0011355863,0.0046819113,0.000972216],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016890843,0.000022059563,0.00021052043,0.0000852474,0.000004402124,0.00012404984,0.008567786,0.00013277115,0.00021519978,0.80153286,0.17292629,0.01616196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011083669,0.000025050835,0.0011766896,0.0005110585,0.000004678798,0.00016979536,0.008717275,0.00022975239,0.00022210741,0.25903696,0.7298806,0.000014894835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006396956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071787233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006396956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003088899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023458337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022411704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W261781484","doi":"","title":"An Opportunity for Equality: Kokopenace and Nur at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Constitutionality; Jury; Criminal law; Precedent; Criminal justice; Criminal procedure; Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04488314533343418,"score_gpt":0.3175911092081196,"score_spread":0.27270796387468543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W261781484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09854768,0.01980906,0.0021552723,0.3696864,0.003402189,0.00023704502,0.0004073827,0.000085243075,0.50566983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6929054,0.0056598284,0.0018832092,0.11930837,0.00062822294,0.00014620957,0.00012557046,0.000120690835,0.17922246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871071,0.0014896557,0.00025308883,0.0017172358,0.004165408,0.005267533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939685,0.0014948671,0.0001450262,0.00021070201,0.0022080066,0.0019729817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053706756,0.00051666267,0.0010148261,0.0010597314,0.065471366,0.018371535,0.003614921,0.017638423,0.0059233652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013293906,0.001007545,0.0007199174,0.0015747914,0.01859402,0.0051706587,0.006067527,0.02186938,0.00053798046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003251169,0.000042638796,0.0026163047,0.000045941357,0.000030076486,0.0014170659,0.019254494,0.00035035724,0.00036847754,0.87294877,0.09450607,0.008387303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000081110964,0.000044177228,0.00789769,0.0006655112,0.00013680657,0.00047596902,0.03916629,0.001459529,0.00088004366,0.13060829,0.81814766,0.0004369089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9842795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99438864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13187326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13187326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24368924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95681196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618678109","doi":"10.1353/book.12456","title":"Droits et voix - Rights and Voices La criminologie à l'Université d'Ottawa - Criminology at the University of Ottawa","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Criminology; Art","score_opus":0.04238673222889535,"score_gpt":0.2449875719795206,"score_spread":0.20260083975062523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618678109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007849633,0.02996726,0.0005282198,0.012165328,0.00093412335,0.000028000924,0.0002718459,0.000046348574,0.9482092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16640395,0.008841325,0.00037013943,0.0010389255,0.00018038938,0.000033788725,0.00009878445,0.00008930374,0.82294333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866414,0.00024557163,0.00004361026,0.00015063665,0.00036507286,0.0005309034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920124,0.0002651312,0.000048747163,0.00010818508,0.00018348715,0.00019330563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007775742,0.000630411,0.0004520747,0.0010508958,0.009306442,0.011522853,0.0010394556,0.0028943922,0.034284957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020815171,0.00055591343,0.0002481456,0.0014063804,0.013573783,0.0042225537,0.002704756,0.0041295635,0.0038426074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026474458,0.000013810897,0.000490879,0.000081510065,0.0000052628784,0.00010763115,0.01633806,0.00011666784,0.00017131816,0.86743695,0.08672967,0.028481752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050130507,0.0000063610064,0.0010862104,0.00023320745,0.000006783744,0.00008315315,0.009234135,0.000040621613,0.00016482975,0.024912478,0.9642129,0.000014245512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7054116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85368043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2945884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025449414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023227721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59264654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618762484","doi":"10.7202/1039834ar","title":"L’architecture d’Auschwitz, le droit et l’art","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.01134177806784281,"score_gpt":0.2644701508871144,"score_spread":0.2531283728192716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618762484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012882018,0.012235753,0.037807778,0.024594525,0.0012990503,0.00004189548,0.00013976633,0.000178533,0.91082066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5189839,0.0080731455,0.017800057,0.0051677567,0.0007821959,0.00017835213,0.00018509747,0.00044014154,0.44838932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764675,0.00094313733,0.00009494532,0.0004567182,0.0006246531,0.00023386983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843043,0.0007129103,0.00010150628,0.00041592654,0.0002254925,0.0001136412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017373536,0.00078133703,0.00032908807,0.0017099874,0.005266697,0.01170755,0.0010990995,0.00415624,0.020250283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032642903,0.00046321936,0.00051614904,0.0014349881,0.024593899,0.008466128,0.005248129,0.00449686,0.0033579937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033240688,0.0000015929887,0.000061064195,0.000015811915,0.0000011608709,0.000018680163,0.0015702981,0.00011402811,0.00006398893,0.9914932,0.0029065385,0.0037502546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055691376,0.0000111829195,0.00051002065,0.00015086666,0.000005474468,0.00014842262,0.0021857063,0.00056118326,0.00037417,0.37068543,0.62534386,0.000018136512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025659384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03294784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025659384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009354817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050806035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06787425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618804890","doi":"10.7202/1039831ar","title":"L’architecture constitutionnelle — Dimensions artistiques d’une construction juridique","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Constitution; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.009952514296946146,"score_gpt":0.2578422947240796,"score_spread":0.24788978042713344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618804890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03672021,0.0034359917,0.02910639,0.008682561,0.00038193524,0.00006838135,0.00015423472,0.00014392623,0.9213063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8751646,0.002508589,0.010864366,0.00087377644,0.0001466195,0.00010052802,0.00013615093,0.0001656291,0.11003975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972621,0.0010914862,0.000069431066,0.00026716455,0.0008436732,0.00046613233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998563,0.00038089955,0.00012180582,0.00025443517,0.00043169415,0.00024820602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00214921,0.0004900038,0.00025949252,0.0018491185,0.009616907,0.014068633,0.00094353606,0.0017614699,0.011035937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002908275,0.00029692624,0.0003308721,0.0024623147,0.037944287,0.005608074,0.0034250745,0.0037903031,0.00093265687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040051605,0.0000017082965,0.00020630649,0.000017191773,0.0000013243703,0.00002863327,0.00834871,0.00012324893,0.00015802537,0.9866397,0.0013704314,0.0031006888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011347746,0.000017296547,0.0043797367,0.00026546678,0.000010851665,0.0002774424,0.024686996,0.00087535765,0.00056659756,0.2658045,0.70305157,0.00005284719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2417591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30839202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2417591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022670193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02237833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48070383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2618908183","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1304","title":"To Dignity Through the Back Door: Tsilhqot’in and the Aboriginal Title Test","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Law; Dignity; Test (biology); High Court; Political science; Common law; Sovereignty; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.04831282771233143,"score_gpt":0.35818919162769614,"score_spread":0.3098763639153647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2618908183","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082296856,0.08622781,0.0064262655,0.23954502,0.0039758654,0.00014130956,0.00025938582,0.00005082072,0.5810766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86315906,0.013263855,0.0024661475,0.062927134,0.0009598459,0.000078189456,0.00009931024,0.00004359729,0.057002917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913504,0.0023882862,0.00030477636,0.00069553877,0.0036452005,0.0016157171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935447,0.003915099,0.0002856608,0.00022771585,0.0016225466,0.0004042892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008274571,0.00021120824,0.0006177956,0.0013970974,0.008314237,0.007387015,0.0021753865,0.0071541844,0.0024461986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01757923,0.00030097654,0.00042174995,0.0015534171,0.016025696,0.0032419795,0.0021347294,0.007843831,0.00024742837],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012030872,0.0000062720965,0.00044986643,0.00009498121,0.000008545277,0.00035470567,0.005246484,0.00012992934,0.00018494105,0.9693062,0.014997015,0.009209066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051877112,0.0000688835,0.005929643,0.0013814215,0.00009445619,0.00033613056,0.013193735,0.0007469667,0.0014369169,0.29292125,0.68368053,0.00015815812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63946813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7422835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63946813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027446289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051572897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7253102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619060581","doi":"10.7202/1039833ar","title":"Oh ! le beau droit. La pertinence du jugement esthétique pour le jugement juridique","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008985408291612401,"score_gpt":0.24993673980946585,"score_spread":0.24095133151785345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619060581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036788497,0.014147356,0.0088086,0.17486258,0.0053832387,0.00008231843,0.00021862287,0.0001542314,0.75955456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6174209,0.006294002,0.0028720596,0.02672054,0.0023539634,0.00012093136,0.00013157731,0.00028590363,0.34380004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99482393,0.0019429338,0.00013131334,0.00067595835,0.001665415,0.000760566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646497,0.0015402737,0.00032531045,0.0003322338,0.0008759688,0.0004612016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039454782,0.0004889892,0.00043287384,0.00090246345,0.014050669,0.012315127,0.0011370914,0.0045186877,0.024800502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009473374,0.0003877272,0.0004916082,0.0011278093,0.017332364,0.007774876,0.00570128,0.010338715,0.0043816543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040172014,0.000016952377,0.0010203322,0.00010467635,0.000010265089,0.00027866504,0.03891556,0.000078503996,0.00033077277,0.8866992,0.05048991,0.022015018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020807882,0.000040472307,0.0031132896,0.00041347113,0.000019086121,0.00040504683,0.029415179,0.00013692532,0.0005874878,0.0918017,0.87399024,0.000056192857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021954792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036545448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024800502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054444363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061818156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08296597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619669325","doi":"10.7202/1039835ar","title":"Law and Art in China : Domination and Resistance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"China; Chinese law; Resistance (ecology); Private law; Expression (computer science); Law; Function (biology); Identity (music); Law and economics; Political science; Scope (computer science); Public law; Sociology; Aesthetics; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.005679196328906673,"score_gpt":0.2485079602825454,"score_spread":0.24282876395363873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619669325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.886148,0.0024371832,0.0006682278,0.0073238397,0.00003177007,0.000024414914,0.000021502487,0.000019793724,0.10332529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972277,0.00031596192,0.000066067274,0.00013992326,0.000013376174,0.000005553422,0.0000037884993,0.0000022432546,0.0022252672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975401,0.0006931435,0.000127175,0.0002997188,0.00061868323,0.0007212221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998156,0.0008367133,0.0003674555,0.0001723026,0.00020555008,0.0002620657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030720776,0.00027134988,0.00035855334,0.0044480967,0.009289404,0.0073310533,0.0008896129,0.001328689,0.0037082094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002669731,0.00022684947,0.00030337286,0.004801039,0.031135932,0.0033737267,0.0041733864,0.001563394,0.000084652434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049898383,0.000055115554,0.047204077,0.00014884947,0.00003805032,0.0017452335,0.25930992,0.0009308999,0.001196407,0.6356153,0.001609029,0.052097283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057381174,0.00023037226,0.4552339,0.00057983946,0.000093071794,0.0011562465,0.21141636,0.006686592,0.0017628294,0.15989326,0.1627075,0.00018260532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0925642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12028008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0925642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018463513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008180118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1840508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620997730","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1256","title":"“Don’t Want to Get Exposed”: Law’s Violence and Access to Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05194663206499233,"score_gpt":0.39562403984215405,"score_spread":0.3436774077771617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620997730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.838256,0.0027938425,0.0015527054,0.088963285,0.00025209808,0.000036272897,0.000029552466,0.000020190197,0.06809609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953074,0.0003701441,0.00009122849,0.0030992522,0.000010656098,0.000008791981,0.000003778969,0.0000055534265,0.0011031455],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98612565,0.009888312,0.00022007851,0.00047119122,0.0010804848,0.0022143864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914191,0.004518984,0.00090517855,0.0002278697,0.0007520479,0.002176878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006218162,0.0002495145,0.00045702004,0.001032476,0.025168836,0.011032612,0.0014975622,0.0036280027,0.0034104753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015972884,0.00038606545,0.00028729226,0.0010457733,0.05982635,0.008303098,0.009989765,0.007224401,0.00023795587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012137492,0.000029075707,0.0042191185,0.00004031499,0.0000072520115,0.00049537123,0.9601535,0.000019332241,0.000118317104,0.029550865,0.0016209605,0.0037337118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035727467,0.000010335463,0.0021738836,0.00013702983,0.0000049495693,0.0002194457,0.9815073,0.00003772743,0.00005002169,0.005947442,0.009894844,0.0000135106675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19685683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25656024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19685683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013694004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014707005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39142197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622300411","doi":"","title":"Learning Indigenous Law: Reflections on Working with Western Inuit Stories","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Commission; Conversation; Traditional knowledge; Political science; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law; Public relations; Geography","score_opus":0.07608646644328293,"score_gpt":0.35999907955688526,"score_spread":0.28391261311360233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622300411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8694817,0.0015677504,0.0026911006,0.018524297,0.00048715598,0.00031783784,0.00009140696,0.0000899495,0.106748804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96785104,0.0015710781,0.0016340282,0.004060283,0.00012056488,0.00018914609,0.0000620806,0.0001885942,0.024323184],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828241,0.011410252,0.00042315945,0.0009195356,0.001376184,0.0030467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848904,0.010302561,0.00059773936,0.0004860113,0.001681478,0.002041837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015475079,0.0019438417,0.0016105635,0.0038062728,0.06514571,0.016969083,0.005048151,0.006817789,0.0070260963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025849266,0.0011274762,0.0007108424,0.0040168217,0.041205116,0.012480998,0.018273694,0.012749208,0.0009006594],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029420028,0.000011987772,0.00011428416,0.000013698838,9.814952e-7,0.0003006969,0.99781066,0.000006251291,0.00006925672,0.0009286334,0.00022292366,0.0005177133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010929148,0.000007633012,0.00014104752,0.000043945016,0.000002882934,0.00011743842,0.9906555,0.000020915137,0.00008540634,0.0002719771,0.008646221,0.000006034881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2377635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3319735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2377635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020917486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011479008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47275913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623813402","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2978069","title":"A New Tort for 'Revenge Porn': Doe 464533 v. N.D. as a Case Study in Judicial Law-Making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Political science; Liability","score_opus":0.018335325135803143,"score_gpt":0.34203364035811284,"score_spread":0.3236983152223097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623813402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1728254,0.007925742,0.00596527,0.19687223,0.0018346362,0.00016551069,0.0006393438,0.00011174497,0.6136601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7854668,0.0036545226,0.0043987655,0.076817155,0.00026379043,0.00016804566,0.000164407,0.00008733156,0.12897915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99571216,0.0014968754,0.0001386551,0.0005873785,0.0012457592,0.00081916864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677163,0.0021918938,0.0002108029,0.00019042402,0.00028254828,0.00035267108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049698483,0.0005164204,0.00042563822,0.00091116794,0.02025935,0.007040429,0.0024453949,0.020763615,0.003754975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009049878,0.00068634085,0.0006936768,0.0012622759,0.009145108,0.0060091815,0.0034979659,0.011011852,0.000559392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013750642,0.0001875971,0.0037674983,0.00018021933,0.00003052915,0.0065703704,0.041189935,0.0003749172,0.0013436093,0.68278354,0.24502455,0.018409815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009356358,0.00016152821,0.010548092,0.0007000085,0.00010327311,0.0050148177,0.04125161,0.0008519049,0.0026801624,0.05901658,0.879383,0.00019547806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11971842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30494374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11971842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062553254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009827985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23804319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2624958397","doi":"","title":"Transgender Intrasectionality: Rethinking Anti-Discrimination Law and Litigation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Performativity; Intersectionality; Transgender; Critical race theory; Race (biology); Law; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Queer theory; Queer; Set (abstract data type); Political science; Law and economics; Gender studies; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08491800983161889,"score_gpt":0.29554970243466266,"score_spread":0.21063169260304376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2624958397","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13080043,0.0049692686,0.02907229,0.49859408,0.004836375,0.00020002635,0.00011668213,0.00031673498,0.33109406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89540374,0.001600683,0.0057192645,0.07411708,0.0013820283,0.0001736787,0.000054188582,0.00018162894,0.021367608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9665377,0.015203538,0.0018121534,0.0041105608,0.00617211,0.0061638276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8602941,0.12057594,0.0033167305,0.0058888253,0.005779132,0.0041452707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05108119,0.0004922075,0.00069530535,0.0035122226,0.028505594,0.032064058,0.007104611,0.03504979,0.011685754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106354915,0.0010187582,0.0012535701,0.0019537478,0.05056444,0.031764537,0.017980939,0.03303557,0.001283611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033141652,0.000101986734,0.0019298014,0.00006128814,0.000011536553,0.0005093237,0.03699913,0.00018354024,0.00033987474,0.9203619,0.018974796,0.020493684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086783475,0.00013709738,0.004141446,0.0015684011,0.00014363833,0.00078872696,0.116470866,0.0022875653,0.0022797436,0.60099924,0.27088317,0.00021322047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0238618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04724804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05108119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008960411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023179682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27014643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625627503","doi":"10.7202/1038494ar","title":"The Tricksters Speak: Klooscap and Wesakechak, Indigenous Law, and the New Brunswick Land Use Negotiation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trickster; Indigenous; Jungle; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Government (linguistics); Colonialism; Duty; Sociology; Political science; Negotiation; Corporate governance; Ecology; Geography; Anthropology; Management; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.015035218628888056,"score_gpt":0.2457457717365032,"score_spread":0.23071055310761512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625627503","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28018907,0.024019936,0.0009993063,0.37232563,0.0010778042,0.00010386916,0.000095831856,0.00003305745,0.32115555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9055718,0.0041516176,0.0004980585,0.035688534,0.00010516502,0.00006573394,0.000025621282,0.00003950027,0.053853966],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99230874,0.0027286445,0.0002080681,0.00054196245,0.0012003779,0.0030121747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99509335,0.0030568268,0.00027539517,0.00015315309,0.00058652996,0.0008347473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072802254,0.0005510516,0.0005025901,0.0017166123,0.044349954,0.018361961,0.0031829781,0.00863545,0.0055636293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0089567285,0.00057836017,0.0003734085,0.0026870996,0.047740843,0.008045363,0.009915608,0.011231314,0.0004044971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047872905,0.000032560387,0.0031249002,0.00010002914,0.000014514033,0.0032432955,0.52654886,0.0001762437,0.00047332593,0.43366063,0.022954317,0.009623461],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026412328,0.0000110692345,0.003936246,0.00044700128,0.00001924461,0.00032325776,0.69117904,0.00015408886,0.00039317698,0.027149176,0.27625874,0.000102535734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9176926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95073384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09823975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09823975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.070910074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7127826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625806602","doi":"","title":"Lost Image – Grand Bend","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Island writer","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Image (mathematics); Computer vision; Computer science","score_opus":0.009526324822118449,"score_gpt":0.27162098408703106,"score_spread":0.2620946592649126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625806602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033466753,0.00447572,0.0003073761,0.21259159,0.028835062,0.00007398077,0.00057834043,0.00019577426,0.7194754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025939075,0.0005758636,0.00014146815,0.016066438,0.0007596493,0.000015779226,0.000112617774,0.000087194414,0.9563018],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963593,0.000040475963,0.000007837977,0.000047549238,0.000103195496,0.00016501652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996038,0.000028099068,0.000013180801,0.000017873073,0.0000865131,0.00025053052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004699805,0.00037887495,0.00021307946,0.00035909333,0.009827962,0.0034802856,0.0005900391,0.0029193747,0.107193224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010380953,0.00019933493,0.00021310587,0.00023034721,0.0012591718,0.0014113185,0.0031191632,0.0070302193,0.014928114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004581476,0.00003745602,0.0008486449,0.000033780074,0.000003983966,0.0014903374,0.0025339457,0.000043606447,0.00031461474,0.010434341,0.9565936,0.027619887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046729056,0.000009837326,0.0012523938,0.000037860736,0.000001321453,0.00027920443,0.0035082693,0.000012223058,0.00006968777,0.0006362953,0.99418324,0.0000049854757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048131026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22465093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95186895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028279447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029771533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3585971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2625910630","doi":"","title":"Ingrid Bachmann. On Truth and Lies in the stricto sensu / Ingrid Bachmann, Pinocchio’s Dilemma, 2007 May 11 – June 11, 2012","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Espace Sculpture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sensu stricto; Dilemma; Philosophy; Epistemology; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.012133586564269909,"score_gpt":0.2614308326589019,"score_spread":0.24929724609463197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2625910630","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00094104453,0.17056988,0.0005908387,0.6166283,0.015813217,0.000024908304,0.00023576424,0.00007167994,0.19512436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12184701,0.10904373,0.0013555421,0.22889902,0.030526062,0.00018577595,0.00023887341,0.00032137832,0.5075826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857616,0.00050014915,0.000057418256,0.00028337204,0.00034936256,0.00023359394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891627,0.00058798085,0.0001140514,0.000064120824,0.00016106605,0.00015644277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001411344,0.0010116503,0.00047885586,0.0012064467,0.0063923355,0.004599936,0.0011173525,0.010225107,0.027898537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005926654,0.00043397577,0.00029249728,0.0011507927,0.0054390044,0.008100712,0.0033292181,0.006456435,0.008002014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013009343,0.00000431225,0.000048973336,0.00005229662,0.0000024242022,0.000066504275,0.00082970475,0.000029259303,0.00002035645,0.09777012,0.8902721,0.010891063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012287408,0.000003983298,0.00038903853,0.00025650355,0.0000025915117,0.00009819044,0.0012548765,0.000049579827,0.000073413,0.043895353,0.95394534,0.000018900699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03467976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05001363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03467976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004186683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019565579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093329966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626426702","doi":"","title":"Victimhood and Socio-legal Narratives of Hate Crime Against Queer Communities in Canada, 1985-2003","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Queer; Narrative; Criminology; Hate crime; Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Media studies; History; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.019480327475849657,"score_gpt":0.30075990753593673,"score_spread":0.2812795800600871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626426702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9574759,0.0024629699,0.00037436778,0.011286018,0.00014684703,0.00011959354,0.0013762447,0.00003230909,0.026725816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97745186,0.001550069,0.00021630812,0.0011579746,0.000022631019,0.00004860835,0.0003556845,0.000021945343,0.019174933],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981255,0.00034065,0.000047321435,0.00015828076,0.00039433423,0.0009338913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959836,0.0007802075,0.0005494065,0.00011166267,0.0014363171,0.0011388403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001834327,0.0004399247,0.0005036144,0.0034968841,0.044027228,0.006629487,0.002263285,0.0014247389,0.0052226693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005209721,0.0005105182,0.0003585265,0.0061311177,0.009488989,0.0026441894,0.003975916,0.0035891663,0.0002562709],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036539244,0.000026988486,0.023520108,0.000056363693,0.000010125818,0.0006459459,0.95118976,0.00008550299,0.00018026614,0.007873338,0.008001547,0.008373515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029025,0.000010539186,0.031139107,0.00009640825,0.000010786739,0.000121727404,0.9215463,0.00010530681,0.0001296611,0.0003329755,0.046471734,0.000032615902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16572532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16572532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14445944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9676404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2637886915","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the Limits on Judicial Expression in the Digital Age: Striving Towards Proportionally in the Cyberintimidation Context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intimidation; Phenomenon; Context (archaeology); Harassment; Duty; Democracy; Political science; Economic Justice; Face (sociological concept); Diversity (politics); Expression (computer science); Dimension (graph theory); Vulnerability (computing); Law; Internet privacy; Sociology; Law and economics; Computer security; History; Politics; Social science; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027163892737620727,"score_gpt":0.31626849796367057,"score_spread":0.28910460522604986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2637886915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19857968,0.0091175,0.019368269,0.14672273,0.0011394685,0.00004809435,0.00006073535,0.000084247215,0.62487924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843924,0.0011176806,0.0010016058,0.0061102314,0.00047833138,0.00004197138,0.000009499342,0.00003166076,0.0068166344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98539853,0.0069198566,0.00088212383,0.002346253,0.0028589538,0.0015943766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713685,0.018697225,0.0021541184,0.0039024197,0.0022473685,0.0016303086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013082016,0.00033776183,0.00051277597,0.00159357,0.010079271,0.021473497,0.0025846236,0.007029537,0.0063026203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03145617,0.00043065357,0.00033616944,0.0009816249,0.06873801,0.02608173,0.01829105,0.009630305,0.0010073372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011990171,0.000015597485,0.0005048865,0.000028756862,0.00000252148,0.00011728609,0.02493487,0.000075970594,0.00020602792,0.96560603,0.0013327928,0.0071631894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026884647,0.000049663613,0.001700553,0.0006387126,0.000018775383,0.00038490765,0.04494134,0.00053416385,0.0011834549,0.7358219,0.21465226,0.000047475703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00462211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045148414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021473497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056058215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007019293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06918514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W267682309","doi":"","title":"A new participatory policy model: the Edmonton citizen's jury on internet voting","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Verdict; Voting; Deliberation; Citizen journalism; Participatory budgeting; Political science; The Internet; Public participation; Public relations; Public administration; Business; Law; Computer science; Democracy; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04701578906757741,"score_gpt":0.31585966516798014,"score_spread":0.2688438761004027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W267682309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040130343,0.0034149762,0.13731572,0.17175409,0.0015683979,0.0019071099,0.00028725347,0.000110908106,0.6435113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8363141,0.0020377478,0.07480368,0.011251179,0.00050358946,0.0022303439,0.00009022828,0.00007043765,0.07269876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91552955,0.0662934,0.0008947763,0.0044154804,0.007460506,0.0054064244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682549,0.023915084,0.0011165101,0.0015986043,0.0031746821,0.0019403012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.058178086,0.0010110216,0.0009537348,0.0029648226,0.020948587,0.016596656,0.0047596227,0.0108299,0.008721346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0412968,0.0009493405,0.0009503143,0.0028598648,0.03359527,0.008066256,0.007379948,0.007961735,0.0006481119],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002244741,0.000023590508,0.00034061444,0.00004948961,0.000010530466,0.00010936954,0.0070603546,0.0021721967,0.00006403295,0.98157054,0.003423659,0.005152993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014446258,0.00006682918,0.0007098881,0.0003932177,0.000040527073,0.00006972755,0.009122332,0.008866513,0.00022653518,0.81801236,0.162255,0.000092578346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26479316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3976046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73520684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050100677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10615004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5265038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2726975471","doi":"","title":"Public Inquiries and the Legality of Blaming: Truth, Justice and the Canadian Way","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Sophistication; Principle of legality; Political science; Politics; Commission; Economic Justice; Public relations; Legitimacy; Population; Law and economics; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.030540131168263887,"score_gpt":0.2561833461488009,"score_spread":0.22564321498053702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2726975471","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048421383,0.012262079,0.0050259074,0.48765153,0.00090143713,0.000054045722,0.00009728898,0.000073920164,0.4455124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94609714,0.003279251,0.0013577847,0.024140961,0.00024154066,0.00003204977,0.000021708016,0.000059169444,0.024770373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.974743,0.0112123005,0.00088386197,0.0018723293,0.006727711,0.0045608617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95901275,0.024062146,0.002946002,0.0028460342,0.008522155,0.0026109903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026307821,0.00034574448,0.00084512663,0.0026851783,0.04469795,0.024297096,0.0030066548,0.020046711,0.008432611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07560024,0.00082599744,0.0005991674,0.0032530571,0.096279316,0.018013956,0.00908946,0.015583721,0.0006719531],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013466588,0.000011979522,0.0004802006,0.000025637137,0.0000057351886,0.00014101609,0.03651704,0.00008962186,0.000036095003,0.9458729,0.011290027,0.005516285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003546845,0.000018133263,0.002269566,0.0005259837,0.000036680605,0.00023137136,0.040803175,0.00074458873,0.0003049847,0.7245128,0.23040184,0.00011536711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7810856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76428294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21891439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06417388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09902399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46561623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2729041244","doi":"","title":"Locura, disidencia y transducción","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Palabra Clave","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Downtown; State (computer science); Law; Legitimacy; Political science; Art; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02265691077125521,"score_gpt":0.3350713537360945,"score_spread":0.3124144429648393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2729041244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077650905,0.008835532,0.0061864485,0.010773909,0.00217113,0.000051025276,0.00013347877,0.00036858363,0.8938289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89324915,0.0044623176,0.0011615878,0.0014836756,0.0012787082,0.00007035062,0.00012076107,0.00023117667,0.09794231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760497,0.0010204469,0.00006341839,0.0004304666,0.00050846214,0.00037221357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992111,0.0002689182,0.0001400874,0.0001797693,0.00013263931,0.00006744461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017105369,0.00071156764,0.0005864537,0.0014661477,0.0047770534,0.008036661,0.00079272717,0.0018582366,0.0073165037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029655078,0.0002709192,0.00050394406,0.0010035569,0.021816852,0.0039766813,0.0049787275,0.0048324955,0.0029458238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007566275,0.000029621,0.0012841788,0.00011597048,0.000011489697,0.00055728346,0.029704183,0.00017256182,0.0004304911,0.9274879,0.0107652,0.029365458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040803516,0.00010338979,0.0036670163,0.0003427341,0.000033072225,0.0010006886,0.015155943,0.00038090465,0.0010358274,0.058637634,0.91956544,0.00003651177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066255033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046595195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008036661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065388903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012564876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04744315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2730402008","doi":"10.3968/9661","title":"From Coke to Maine: The Formation of Concept of “Legal Fiction” at English Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Power (physics); Legal fiction; Legislature; Jeremy bentham; Legal history; Legal realism; Sociology; History; Political science; Legal profession","score_opus":0.0144910251972478,"score_gpt":0.27052814787992707,"score_spread":0.25603712268267925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2730402008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054612804,0.08991012,0.004546241,0.37553594,0.0062649935,0.00008323007,0.00008650045,0.00007870122,0.46888152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80151874,0.014455218,0.00213833,0.040008694,0.0022740043,0.000097278695,0.000047646492,0.00022438835,0.13923573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960699,0.0020139925,0.000089162364,0.0005413428,0.0007603466,0.0005252677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99076205,0.0063181673,0.00031638745,0.000279089,0.0014417989,0.0008825723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00389096,0.00044173104,0.0004140654,0.003473553,0.018780015,0.01232484,0.0010019423,0.0065582287,0.0048604957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012257551,0.00044286242,0.00020330171,0.0021587806,0.045635015,0.010883807,0.006261497,0.008027023,0.0008567268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021020995,0.000014558722,0.0004249718,0.000084117266,0.0000036215301,0.0004004481,0.14057961,0.000044580283,0.00024190277,0.7832402,0.06393814,0.011006833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006575953,0.00001535277,0.00092792953,0.00043503483,0.000003701038,0.00025666237,0.020014465,0.0000981616,0.0003589996,0.049974706,0.92788064,0.000027796064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.115740314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17880476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115740314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028966034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009388877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23013324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2733546198","doi":"","title":"Холокост как медийный полуфабрикат. Рецензия на работу: Роте А. Популярная травма: коммерциализация боли в массмедиа. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2011. 206 с","year":2016,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Новое прошлое / The New Past","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.014045170325497784,"score_gpt":0.2287474138112026,"score_spread":0.2147022434857048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2733546198","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02008365,0.1074055,0.011971406,0.049397223,0.0033545913,0.00007218157,0.00026591608,0.00015585955,0.80729365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71086574,0.040883224,0.01591972,0.004411454,0.001838068,0.0002468081,0.00016206411,0.00027318488,0.22539982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976629,0.0008485116,0.0000820734,0.00026232222,0.00091591064,0.00022828691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998689,0.0005049788,0.00015095838,0.00016306233,0.00037617117,0.000115837334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002085337,0.00045043172,0.0002857012,0.0013334639,0.0029726403,0.008471401,0.0005712422,0.0016805809,0.009427153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035886406,0.00043696084,0.00028031893,0.0017234022,0.01056815,0.0041051367,0.001694196,0.0031589859,0.002739209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021180904,0.000010940835,0.00028910596,0.00009037758,0.00000374793,0.00009255912,0.0054120487,0.00004943855,0.00042387002,0.93452495,0.024249349,0.034832485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012147023,0.000024104127,0.0017369435,0.00025613394,0.000010052772,0.00030458227,0.003987608,0.00011587615,0.0006970897,0.1491051,0.84372896,0.000021502745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011021764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01969566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011021764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049419748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03307736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735763179","doi":"","title":"Brand Management in Canadian Law","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01649267383422016,"score_gpt":0.27007702250115817,"score_spread":0.253584348666938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735763179","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3147343,0.0063735917,0.00093505287,0.098062456,0.0008367564,0.00010552478,0.0006102982,0.00009893094,0.5782431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82927203,0.0018927874,0.0007529071,0.0075730123,0.00013136705,0.00003068549,0.00013181809,0.000047922673,0.16016737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950604,0.00043427016,0.00011246856,0.0005367842,0.002089066,0.0017670088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99233186,0.0014251341,0.0004605659,0.00027875416,0.0031991187,0.0023045277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032755923,0.00032518213,0.00037116546,0.0040952414,0.031498782,0.016024282,0.0018255232,0.0041308575,0.020524923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012260016,0.00051656173,0.0004715534,0.0060319635,0.008551657,0.0028666884,0.0029701812,0.006179475,0.00064189517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066374654,0.00013376873,0.020814752,0.000083583494,0.00002406977,0.0004883707,0.04167875,0.0005516653,0.00042702304,0.75837755,0.10380214,0.073551886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022880937,0.000034095097,0.08627243,0.00022868124,0.000039105733,0.0001410908,0.038627334,0.0011503536,0.0004489853,0.018032368,0.8548651,0.00013757423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20749973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20749973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1902676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91918796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736678699","doi":"10.1016/j.carj.2017.06.001","title":"Defending the Truth in a Post-Truth Era","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; Health Sciences Centre; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Post truth; Law","score_opus":0.0131178308270576,"score_gpt":0.2882947663217291,"score_spread":0.27517693549467154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736678699","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004783254,0.0053081037,0.00007845811,0.10486279,0.8880099,0.0000109209295,0.000021626267,0.000017688271,0.0016427453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009838464,0.0039428347,0.000081203405,0.024653144,0.9664302,0.000019662473,0.000008874361,0.000023762615,0.0038564426],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98280495,0.0041976054,0.0019116789,0.0012337137,0.0086340625,0.0012178936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8746939,0.09263129,0.0029958175,0.0022061162,0.02025202,0.0072208284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017142644,0.0034244042,0.004127791,0.0068132565,0.010483174,0.020316655,0.0059341625,0.04816721,0.008194437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10209188,0.0012279892,0.0026037956,0.0031757108,0.012705751,0.0091024,0.0032690929,0.043048747,0.003291202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012622566,0.000009028576,0.000025396259,0.00016706953,0.000013769441,0.00012619888,0.0001204869,0.00001892291,0.00001668844,0.0023206116,0.99483514,0.0023341784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037596983,0.000015369247,0.00024134036,0.0011932411,0.00005706999,0.00022187881,0.0005817401,0.0001666053,0.00006898004,0.0074981647,0.989883,0.00003499418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010441963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028909354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04816721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010472534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016643384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090660036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737624476","doi":"","title":"Legal History As Legal Scholarship: Doctrinalism, Interdisciplinarity, and Critical Analysis of Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legal history; Legal realism; Law; Legal profession; Empirical legal studies; Jurisprudence; Civil law (Civil law); Philosophy of law; Legal research; Scholarship; Comparative law; Common law; Political science; Public law; Legal formalism; Sociology; Private law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.02333847724718977,"score_gpt":0.3566730657693781,"score_spread":0.3333345885221883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737624476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04747831,0.11289193,0.0700656,0.29521754,0.002885425,0.00014619374,0.00007004966,0.00012673448,0.47111812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94291824,0.023512203,0.010430793,0.008464004,0.0028088936,0.00022287104,0.000037743004,0.00010422997,0.011500966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908173,0.007381985,0.0001966257,0.00038566272,0.0008917465,0.00032661046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98654234,0.010213633,0.00092839164,0.00076970924,0.0009040919,0.00064183923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010270763,0.00064014795,0.00059384824,0.0056072203,0.00892806,0.017010257,0.0017447502,0.0037596137,0.002669515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013282078,0.00039852998,0.0003165902,0.0043978198,0.080262005,0.021848388,0.005058884,0.0058957227,0.00030772487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001882334,0.0000070914266,0.00008065848,0.000029946188,0.000001818348,0.000020693013,0.008314484,0.00007275581,0.000022119779,0.9879941,0.00090998993,0.0025444247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004083658,0.0000085626825,0.00013727533,0.00018282297,0.0000023575442,0.000026129543,0.008794349,0.00029715933,0.000063667816,0.9517125,0.03876638,0.0000047563017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004198512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045507234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017010257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013291436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008051877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09643656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739059700","doi":"10.1386/jaac.8.1-2.93_1","title":"‘Disjointed days’: Contemporary art and the human right to housing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Arts & Communities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Convention; Interpretation (philosophy); Squatting position; Gentrification; Value (mathematics); Aesthetics; Space (punctuation); Embodied cognition; Law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Art; Economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Economic growth; Computer science","score_opus":0.05582515494416839,"score_gpt":0.3078401779261792,"score_spread":0.2520150229820108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739059700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07190195,0.010835008,0.0056584305,0.071848996,0.0008578695,0.000014429472,0.000043537297,0.0000323184,0.8388075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810362,0.001405975,0.00046014975,0.0027219937,0.00044121937,0.00001365594,0.000009655101,0.000021967731,0.013889159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433386,0.003466247,0.00013157752,0.0004868599,0.0009228541,0.00065852446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665004,0.002032485,0.00025955847,0.0005248538,0.0002816374,0.00025147962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00392866,0.00027768392,0.0003389618,0.0010054106,0.012398198,0.010282753,0.0010950529,0.004447478,0.007119069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050335624,0.0002267898,0.00025832272,0.0010531488,0.10518747,0.0059424127,0.006431889,0.005397508,0.0004422459],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005451149,0.000006474955,0.00009762184,0.000013768901,0.0000010568501,0.000044951656,0.018142283,0.000078195844,0.000034705845,0.9760399,0.0029694096,0.0025662233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011490797,0.000023395376,0.0008931521,0.0003065775,0.0000053279114,0.00023679563,0.026861021,0.00037144503,0.00019419722,0.64943796,0.32163614,0.000022529579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013483599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01907446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013483599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054864897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021711169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03980744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739456639","doi":"","title":"Placing 'Bestial' Acts in Canada: Legal Meanings of 'Bestiality' and Judicial Engagements with Sociality","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Supreme court; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Sociality; Unpacking; Rhetoric; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.014145937248153337,"score_gpt":0.27153395792007556,"score_spread":0.25738802067192224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739456639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18556984,0.006751421,0.0094806515,0.078948416,0.00041674246,0.000058117355,0.00017549773,0.000058064226,0.71854126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98417455,0.0012511209,0.0010044952,0.002849073,0.000038369555,0.000013358888,0.000023603745,0.00002850812,0.010616876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98896617,0.0032620071,0.00022130976,0.0008469621,0.003817774,0.0028858306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98958194,0.00586255,0.00074752956,0.00047928403,0.0025032791,0.00082541344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008954912,0.0004368815,0.0005247226,0.0031988944,0.033867385,0.01728546,0.0021705343,0.004380521,0.0038674688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018436477,0.00046786558,0.0003596468,0.003978028,0.07079854,0.0059472118,0.0063817473,0.007225926,0.00019314703],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005879724,0.0000050168737,0.0008749938,0.000023767756,0.0000052384894,0.0002340361,0.08146076,0.00016795241,0.00011470171,0.9087874,0.0036568271,0.004663463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018622108,0.000018526649,0.012154834,0.00079234736,0.00007296401,0.00033688318,0.24884875,0.0013038769,0.001168103,0.27236715,0.46273917,0.00017867415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96546245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98076665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10015719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10015719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11672296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72669464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2740952829","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2017.15","title":"Unreliable Narration in Law and Fiction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Agatha; Interpretation (philosophy); Meaning (existential); Law and literature; Law; Sociology; Literature; Psychology; History; Political science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022057949928167897,"score_gpt":0.30214382925243377,"score_spread":0.2800858793242659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2740952829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3398873,0.03156111,0.05753785,0.07738122,0.0037193503,0.00009512196,0.0003292248,0.00037449948,0.48911443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987181,0.0019694834,0.0019608587,0.0011916211,0.00059199304,0.00002723229,0.000058792193,0.00011396153,0.006905202],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804314,0.014286149,0.0004921225,0.0009294149,0.003209617,0.00065120263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96195066,0.027878365,0.003562107,0.0026578156,0.0032136575,0.000737508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006745418,0.00068859954,0.000516496,0.003333412,0.008648445,0.010846033,0.0014166111,0.0030914533,0.0045639668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046526648,0.00039378254,0.00027459365,0.0016612245,0.03527628,0.01316672,0.007949606,0.003345895,0.0007730143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007112787,0.0000112341395,0.0018691259,0.00028671863,0.000017181424,0.0012320493,0.55605006,0.00035244093,0.0007252836,0.41114774,0.009393268,0.018843777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020609205,0.00006772466,0.0027016308,0.0012669193,0.00003528199,0.0019897649,0.1832648,0.001048365,0.0026247783,0.2529532,0.5539337,0.00009318457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005113433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004787509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010846033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057628825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022282328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041812897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2743602939","doi":"","title":"Image Hash: Fuck Canada! And Fuck the United States, Too!, by JGT","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history; Hash function; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.007785495730846846,"score_gpt":0.22969030076051672,"score_spread":0.22190480502966986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2743602939","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015754609,0.0051621054,0.00019116628,0.4089318,0.07149943,0.00005736739,0.0013905105,0.00059238146,0.51059985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027929714,0.0005534885,0.000060261133,0.018858725,0.0019826554,0.0000093207545,0.00010907928,0.00012753025,0.97550607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991762,0.00004969315,0.000016483425,0.00008116815,0.00040910186,0.00026729086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761415,0.00020898295,0.000057607114,0.00009961498,0.001046023,0.0009736306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074094144,0.00062163983,0.0004827462,0.00084170577,0.011273438,0.00954393,0.00070668396,0.0067201876,0.29610783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006172185,0.00036118043,0.0004488501,0.0010243825,0.002513286,0.0033918573,0.0024930513,0.008031946,0.09299717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022900592,0.0000017155908,0.000038507937,0.0000038382855,4.2064215e-7,0.000011508011,0.000057279125,0.0000034060988,0.000015955155,0.00072535936,0.99735993,0.0017797563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026342273,0.0000019482982,0.00036560162,0.000024821737,0.000001288862,0.00001491976,0.0006177926,0.000014002925,0.000028807726,0.00029510816,0.9986272,0.0000058472215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4523273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67519546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5476727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009775786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015805785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99057937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745694497","doi":"","title":"The Judicial Conceptualization of Culture after Delgamuukw and Van der Peet","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue d'études constitutionnelles","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Sovereignty; Law; Politics; Conceptualization; Context (archaeology); Optimal distinctiveness theory; Political science; Sociology; Legal culture; History; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.013735468596793558,"score_gpt":0.2657368160699835,"score_spread":0.25200134747319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2745694497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03488779,0.13734798,0.013214039,0.26898202,0.0048324177,0.00007713382,0.00017273078,0.000048855516,0.540437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82207656,0.033491556,0.003037561,0.048259873,0.0008965506,0.00013904068,0.00009263768,0.00007618292,0.091929965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995613,0.0012110738,0.00009523516,0.00037566383,0.0016339535,0.0010710789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977843,0.0010121317,0.0001318372,0.00009551789,0.0007905654,0.00018578449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002473744,0.00045818754,0.00040299722,0.0013558723,0.00951434,0.009448318,0.0022902372,0.0033467617,0.0021597287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060613556,0.0002939824,0.00030850302,0.0030638347,0.03322425,0.0044014105,0.0019715484,0.006203435,0.00024214048],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043733235,0.0000035608552,0.00017407448,0.000025833917,0.0000026795285,0.000054460823,0.0075309626,0.00007931374,0.000044480414,0.97758204,0.009028737,0.0054694633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017447825,0.000017767876,0.0027605826,0.00070763717,0.000020600386,0.00012055176,0.01735732,0.00028858776,0.00033250666,0.39025173,0.5880657,0.000059556405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72823036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7586096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27176964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035866447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037987668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5467403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746761798","doi":"10.3138/utq.86.3.281","title":"<i>Creating Legal Worlds: Story and Style in a Culture of Argument</i> by Greig Henderson","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Argument (complex analysis); Literature; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.007702383077186256,"score_gpt":0.22889298854751916,"score_spread":0.2211906054703329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746761798","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008552674,0.1560274,0.0050065606,0.66337043,0.007929389,0.000064059066,0.00014839481,0.00012965537,0.15877151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4450716,0.19544637,0.009093831,0.10112762,0.008799362,0.00030445543,0.00035877727,0.0005646523,0.23923331],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979448,0.001324752,0.000053580407,0.00011108802,0.00046162447,0.000104226245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961516,0.002248662,0.00029172716,0.00012809697,0.0006894926,0.00049038325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023256207,0.00060021563,0.00034442559,0.0012246234,0.0056776963,0.008770851,0.0010232662,0.0022961143,0.0050025694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006629735,0.0003803866,0.00026557164,0.0017909297,0.009390514,0.013171503,0.003026442,0.0048556062,0.0016087397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018258028,0.00002096422,0.0006635223,0.00014807541,0.0000099045055,0.00014379552,0.04657681,0.00012994958,0.00018761879,0.13305297,0.79065204,0.028396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062644576,0.000010653844,0.0013212233,0.00045513528,0.000009114715,0.00020761283,0.039169915,0.00017784964,0.00030359311,0.026353383,0.9319612,0.000024172501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04648794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08854683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04648794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046996744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038569847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092434704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750481122","doi":"10.3968/9728","title":"On Features of Legal Terms Applied in the Criminal Case News: Based on Xinran Ji Reports","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal writing; Law; Criminal justice; Criminal law; Relation (database); News media; Legal research; Computer science","score_opus":0.021038223758019753,"score_gpt":0.30350786538545865,"score_spread":0.2824696416274389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750481122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80938125,0.018575411,0.0064526717,0.009821599,0.0010236929,0.0003303612,0.0022898316,0.0001304978,0.1519947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95737565,0.015152279,0.0063359723,0.00081117614,0.0008349171,0.00017477346,0.0025766455,0.00007096382,0.016667556],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908996,0.00030579578,0.00010815766,0.00008423222,0.00034921113,0.00006265466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551564,0.0025957935,0.00069351395,0.000129806,0.00088693877,0.00017827557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011981894,0.00033642945,0.00017283174,0.0094150435,0.0017870076,0.0028476028,0.00027386422,0.00035094746,0.002595681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005610579,0.00012504004,0.00022453365,0.0086565595,0.0016530071,0.0028173337,0.0007983023,0.0005847519,0.00033790356],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028290626,0.00011736123,0.09254571,0.0027751985,0.00005255501,0.010326268,0.4256632,0.00039396193,0.010371203,0.056160547,0.040590014,0.36072102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008863854,0.00010091181,0.36861143,0.0013554165,0.00014609114,0.0027818,0.20740302,0.000819873,0.0031568387,0.0037528418,0.41177678,0.00008614668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012909093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02582492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012909093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019892335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010627324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025667906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751597039","doi":"10.1017/s0008423917000907","title":"Enlightenment 2.0: Restoring Sanity to Our Politics, Our Economy, and Our Lives Joseph Heath Toronto: Harper Collins, 2014, pp. 432.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Sanity; Enlightenment; Politics; Political science; Sociology; Economic history; Political economy; History; Philosophy; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.028860282573676958,"score_gpt":0.3308821288944468,"score_spread":0.30202184632076984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751597039","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023073906,0.105780475,0.004046996,0.44572848,0.005660916,0.0000496209,0.0006618379,0.001507426,0.43425697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07802656,0.08316563,0.006118845,0.038395774,0.0028493237,0.00013196754,0.00093248487,0.001968918,0.7884105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816626,0.00066854723,0.000034715555,0.000096097014,0.00064684585,0.00038751148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859375,0.00032824161,0.00007889346,0.00009334022,0.00027328645,0.0006324425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002924768,0.00065929507,0.0002764224,0.00094696827,0.004848142,0.008282808,0.0012180111,0.003596508,0.038554437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031906974,0.00040694283,0.00030408925,0.00126751,0.0070185517,0.0060322755,0.0035543072,0.0045623444,0.010034283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006981838,0.000006483598,0.000117544456,0.00006495576,0.0000018815822,0.000035833622,0.0020407347,0.000050620034,0.00006348624,0.04234767,0.9250992,0.030164627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024442147,0.0000032252744,0.0006471286,0.00017673569,0.0000016975882,0.000030785453,0.001999633,0.000034983572,0.00009213904,0.008796606,0.98820704,0.00000765778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.113852546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24260148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.113852546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009337245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017259512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22637975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753828066","doi":"10.55496/uzyq4437","title":"The Fraught Terrain of Law and Feminism: 20 Years of Subversive Sites","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Socio-Legal Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Terrain; Law; Sociology; Political science; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.01775987987324272,"score_gpt":0.30444386131896367,"score_spread":0.28668398144572094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753828066","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01679347,0.6924985,0.002007841,0.217608,0.007886369,0.000047636633,0.00014286295,0.00004965846,0.06296561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41674417,0.4196595,0.003330107,0.08604897,0.021186836,0.00026826383,0.00019422398,0.0005123961,0.052055582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98806596,0.0072211544,0.00041617535,0.0008931501,0.0020809202,0.0013226353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93943536,0.04765762,0.0013690508,0.002917262,0.0051123886,0.003508271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028658766,0.00057677005,0.0014610535,0.006142556,0.008833534,0.021351393,0.001903368,0.007530687,0.012532812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039744057,0.00068551325,0.0004854438,0.006551752,0.039863862,0.026757633,0.013382042,0.0075489944,0.0012032132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013094221,0.00021594219,0.00092799123,0.00080455147,0.000028123655,0.00022299994,0.056137994,0.00013023458,0.0002624904,0.67356634,0.10834769,0.15922476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009979514,0.000035805013,0.0010538845,0.0016506765,0.000008693991,0.000106284024,0.012419535,0.00006265456,0.0001363578,0.06497268,0.91951966,0.00002385747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010282185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026143968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028658766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0099348705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015416561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15156382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753914497","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1267","title":"Planning as Property: Uncovering the Hidden Racial Logic of a Municipal Nuisance By-law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Statutory law; Law; Indigenous; Property (philosophy); State (computer science); Identity (music); Political science; Property law; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Property rights; Politics","score_opus":0.03689614601650031,"score_gpt":0.35326902880745514,"score_spread":0.3163728827909548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753914497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44882697,0.0033397162,0.044313885,0.041273456,0.00018748236,0.000078686426,0.00009324527,0.00007663127,0.46180987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98868,0.0006067266,0.0019121886,0.0005468333,0.000024513374,0.000018362452,0.000013817075,0.000023841638,0.008173744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850357,0.0006738603,0.000026214208,0.00017175497,0.00026696475,0.00035765418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861467,0.00071985455,0.00019876682,0.00022928597,0.0001481726,0.000089161644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001912938,0.00021850191,0.00024332658,0.00093698653,0.011062349,0.007110348,0.0011123138,0.0017812779,0.0029693902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004457122,0.0002250253,0.00022923881,0.0016556784,0.045494623,0.0052414117,0.004001817,0.002063096,0.00016462455],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004599983,0.000003971686,0.0014219541,0.000014465997,0.0000020709326,0.00014094696,0.046129044,0.00017613969,0.00013205835,0.9466018,0.0012416925,0.0041313185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014825223,0.000030693245,0.009852286,0.00022712245,0.000024632018,0.00016978903,0.11377724,0.0016790106,0.0009562878,0.598442,0.2748023,0.000023727176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19362469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32599688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19362469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012892013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012011062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38499528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756886862","doi":"","title":"Comparative Law and Gendered Violence: Journey to the Heart of Narration and Identity","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Droit et société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Hybridity; Narrative; Sociology; Law; Identity (music); International law; Homicide; Criminology; Gender studies; Political science; Poison control; Anthropology; Philosophy; Suicide prevention; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.0468895971711619,"score_gpt":0.3787021912897183,"score_spread":0.3318125941185564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756886862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.364657,0.03579878,0.013332373,0.090770386,0.0017340379,0.00009130141,0.00033064297,0.00016323134,0.49312225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835081,0.0032193211,0.0006981059,0.0014991722,0.00016277868,0.000028340482,0.000046935642,0.00007118317,0.010766144],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947373,0.0032792988,0.00005981229,0.00031232793,0.0008301845,0.0007810518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99554044,0.0028381825,0.00029523054,0.00022597998,0.0006002825,0.00049989566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004824222,0.00088541035,0.0008380432,0.0033420618,0.029088307,0.017983245,0.00260414,0.0033738008,0.0047730245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009591837,0.00030664157,0.0002532235,0.004182256,0.086917855,0.008547527,0.0076922616,0.00562226,0.00035755118],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010269715,0.000006500977,0.00043017304,0.00004718288,0.0000032449493,0.00038475698,0.83717257,0.000043556203,0.0001474006,0.1535593,0.0028834671,0.0053116395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002857525,0.000010759983,0.0012300645,0.0002974534,0.0000052265723,0.00026194306,0.82085335,0.00010997772,0.00021632478,0.02407373,0.15292032,0.000018002886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5273934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58519876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5273934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044618916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01738296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95077974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759116696","doi":"","title":"Pulsions créatrices / Baptiste Debombourg, Justice & prudence, Le Lieu, centre en art actuel, Québec, 26 octobre au 18 novembre 2012","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Inter : art actuel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Prudence; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Theology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015768423654369926,"score_gpt":0.27221510033920515,"score_spread":0.25644667668483523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759116696","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019562284,0.21943744,0.0017176328,0.36233088,0.045166526,0.00040698744,0.006978582,0.0007131989,0.34368637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027383687,0.012218589,0.0004868223,0.007854374,0.0013806783,0.00006533223,0.00031416852,0.00012750592,0.9501688],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990491,0.0001537842,0.00003246832,0.00015907385,0.0003244141,0.00028105517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988632,0.00023228601,0.000054413205,0.000034913704,0.0005536714,0.00026154157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011465313,0.0010828953,0.00054799434,0.0012743177,0.013411879,0.0043653655,0.0011939484,0.004280303,0.06909949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024402959,0.0006272203,0.00045972512,0.0012355231,0.0017540992,0.0015004963,0.001298734,0.004875272,0.007306336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042438387,0.00003147086,0.00065097143,0.00007570498,0.0000073907668,0.00016144483,0.0006816819,0.00013991444,0.00023474362,0.0060937586,0.97509176,0.016788792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012507336,0.000007841893,0.005932571,0.00008931981,0.0000048085612,0.00006409563,0.0012570126,0.00013599503,0.00021118794,0.00043552116,0.991829,0.000020120344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92994225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9696287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92994225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0239147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026343102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23116082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759792478","doi":"","title":"Where the Truth Lies : Faux-semblants / La vérité nue Canada — Grande-Bretagne, États-Unis 2005, 108 minutes","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"S&#233;quences : La revue de cin&#233;ma","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.011034555627032388,"score_gpt":0.23795999442220878,"score_spread":0.22692543879517638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759792478","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003635778,0.20499454,0.00046693796,0.5074146,0.05732729,0.00015696415,0.0021801013,0.00035326334,0.22347054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024038337,0.015959654,0.0003556877,0.043504152,0.004208225,0.00009076265,0.00033568015,0.00017017187,0.91133726],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698466,0.00031208177,0.00009685256,0.00042311146,0.0010555346,0.0011277797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984817,0.00030052257,0.000052885018,0.000047750662,0.0005162857,0.0006008449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026318892,0.0012908734,0.0010530861,0.0012697278,0.0262224,0.014701998,0.0018715825,0.01599305,0.055215277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005917949,0.001056935,0.0008512123,0.0019811832,0.00493896,0.0046122465,0.0039583524,0.0115342485,0.010440687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001706179,0.000008337986,0.00016751335,0.000051092877,0.0000050465296,0.00009425421,0.0008158325,0.00003769063,0.00005488637,0.011707054,0.9811476,0.005893755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005966491,0.0000030816932,0.0009294262,0.00014469553,0.0000038036594,0.000018348352,0.0016788209,0.000020200883,0.000040385064,0.0009489849,0.9961933,0.000013111411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9240586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9792255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075941384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061899293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07189279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4491129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760344678","doi":"","title":"La plaidoirie artistique — Reconstitution judiciaire dans l’oeuvre de Christian Patterson, Redheaded Peckerwood / The case for art – Legal re-enactment in Christian Patterson’s Redheaded Peckerwood","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Esse/Esse arts + opinions","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.027170755472724923,"score_gpt":0.2974227735492106,"score_spread":0.2702520180764857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760344678","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023692755,0.022715997,0.0019837024,0.7053908,0.010028985,0.000032849293,0.000025557816,0.000039397542,0.23608986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51148486,0.005233432,0.0013451464,0.16417035,0.0049892343,0.00006838642,0.000015343898,0.000168256,0.31252497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933211,0.002648059,0.00024776944,0.0008925288,0.0015230601,0.0013675088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946485,0.0028290034,0.00035082345,0.00040247545,0.00071956706,0.0010495451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007884084,0.0004468843,0.00043954974,0.0007076663,0.024162747,0.0136850625,0.0016399637,0.018757485,0.0056045996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016751457,0.00062146655,0.00036962488,0.0007041808,0.0343428,0.0063958494,0.0077169305,0.03260669,0.0007907682],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013809754,0.000018415456,0.00017936555,0.0000187352,0.0000042379506,0.00043819562,0.01632476,0.00007525973,0.00015724807,0.846499,0.12790196,0.0083691105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000115420335,0.000012078553,0.00048049536,0.0001909853,0.000004369104,0.00034505615,0.010661873,0.00013846907,0.0003899462,0.069558054,0.91817015,0.0000370616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057011295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09761184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057011295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009139557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011054423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113358915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760976601","doi":"10.1017/s000842391700097x","title":"Nationhood Interrupted: Revitalizing <i>nêhiyaw</i> Legal Systems Sylvia McAdam (Saysewahum) Saskatoon: Purich Publishing Limited, 2015, pp. 120.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Content (measure theory); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Media studies; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0357497302209342,"score_gpt":0.3213216869322216,"score_spread":0.2855719567112874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760976601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13671117,0.033188384,0.0023527874,0.40016967,0.0035474158,0.00012380423,0.00017469321,0.00010916842,0.42362297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66822493,0.017042877,0.0024440328,0.048242807,0.00030539706,0.00016245352,0.00017962564,0.00019912574,0.26319876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989201,0.00039390253,0.000026271779,0.00006904853,0.0001469201,0.00044375085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986749,0.0004761045,0.00011639858,0.00011078923,0.00017970696,0.0004420746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036414978,0.00022455808,0.00021024504,0.00040794726,0.012985621,0.0062308838,0.0014004463,0.0035706686,0.011859976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045392076,0.00030355598,0.00018946217,0.0008018234,0.006958838,0.0069328444,0.006862231,0.0063296417,0.0011128024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006448278,0.000070999755,0.0033843387,0.00015956888,0.000013064466,0.0012525123,0.14394462,0.0001616572,0.0008893386,0.43169832,0.32136992,0.09699116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018035453,0.000036471967,0.007735588,0.00054834754,0.000011930601,0.0001889365,0.08940233,0.0001647938,0.0005874552,0.026310708,0.87496567,0.000029848687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1591183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3634778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8408817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01373544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022969022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31638426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761124672","doi":"","title":"The law and the native people of Ontario","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0076117416335335,"score_gpt":0.21429137111812815,"score_spread":0.20667962948459465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761124672","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05916776,0.027709443,0.00054611114,0.08646198,0.0011023901,0.00010974416,0.0013991421,0.00011697101,0.8233865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26975214,0.012468647,0.00054274953,0.005518124,0.00016302057,0.00006037885,0.00020240058,0.00009782004,0.7111947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986199,0.00010264924,0.00003380186,0.000093031806,0.00044816002,0.00070233503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818987,0.0002854397,0.00010936059,0.00006417749,0.0006822306,0.00066891004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007929942,0.00037480975,0.0003174979,0.0012961371,0.027945364,0.008337071,0.0010893625,0.0023566196,0.023642607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002458234,0.0005242934,0.00025271313,0.003412959,0.00925588,0.00287236,0.0020149471,0.0022505429,0.0013548706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006354632,0.000037817535,0.009434957,0.00041837152,0.000014462124,0.0009594344,0.18411635,0.00019816021,0.00059759844,0.40563017,0.3404427,0.058086433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055598484,0.000006034025,0.009609696,0.00015746235,0.000007390215,0.000096442156,0.041679945,0.000058594174,0.00006752019,0.004447992,0.9438382,0.000025266088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10978431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10978431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21608308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7965447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763310201","doi":"10.1007/s10691-017-9355-y","title":"Wench Tactics? Openings in Conditions of Closure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Closure (psychology); Sociology; Publishing; Law; Economic Justice; Public relations; Political science; Media studies; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06415313747011338,"score_gpt":0.41568183122572055,"score_spread":0.3515286937556072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763310201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060538597,0.015624631,0.019166062,0.2975997,0.019346133,0.00014109882,0.00014033739,0.00079367374,0.5866498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8483478,0.004551463,0.0043956204,0.025393032,0.0058421353,0.00023240526,0.00007971062,0.0009774506,0.11018036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98109806,0.010414347,0.00087095494,0.0017804092,0.0036667138,0.0021694894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689831,0.02022423,0.0029748494,0.003339349,0.0024181178,0.0020602525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014875146,0.0006695802,0.00078607706,0.0028469234,0.018528914,0.02684774,0.002178558,0.0062150513,0.014722035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058760725,0.0005592145,0.00077129214,0.0025653779,0.05432904,0.030923696,0.01254358,0.0082038175,0.0025466587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003424616,0.000011564669,0.00047272665,0.00012113251,0.0000070315723,0.0007794491,0.15614344,0.000040422558,0.0001460695,0.78943783,0.040411867,0.012394302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000152631,0.000021414553,0.00046536647,0.0007503736,0.000012250814,0.00052832346,0.11623998,0.00012074309,0.00041743458,0.12898564,0.752397,0.00004624106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026750115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003977339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02684774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006466341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042643086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07866824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763583617","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3043506","title":"Technologically-Facilitated Violence Against Women and Girls: If Criminal Law Can Respond, Should it?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Harm; Criminal justice; Domestic violence; Law; Criminology; Political science; Terminology; Sociology; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.02490927385105102,"score_gpt":0.3061956138850182,"score_spread":0.2812863400339672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763583617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.732006,0.005108032,0.0010608134,0.1283465,0.0011388737,0.000106263135,0.00020106285,0.00006694943,0.1319655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828935,0.0025405711,0.0004090508,0.0063879485,0.000255754,0.0000897574,0.000048981157,0.000018696499,0.0073556677],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631304,0.0020740419,0.00011783965,0.0003076405,0.0005037647,0.00068366644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99222165,0.0039035906,0.0019116333,0.0006039775,0.00040081056,0.00095824257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026678743,0.00025481344,0.00023153251,0.00075240014,0.003116091,0.0051846933,0.0011905635,0.0030397477,0.021593621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024617976,0.0002448733,0.00040036615,0.00070127763,0.004923954,0.0038120956,0.004292284,0.0022999987,0.0016844542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009177051,0.0026292745,0.24049382,0.0013497809,0.00023833239,0.003223146,0.16928786,0.00051547127,0.005491134,0.17384733,0.052299317,0.3497068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027061946,0.0021286884,0.28225613,0.0036499777,0.00022876642,0.0036651827,0.36458907,0.0005744048,0.0056233187,0.07000819,0.26681423,0.00019148816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051187873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00810625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021593621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014709618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003319434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07223791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765085058","doi":"10.1007/s11417-017-9258-5","title":"Correction to: Sex Offenders of East Asian Heritage Resemble Other Canadian Sex Offenders","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Criminology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; Public Safety Canada; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Criminology; Computer science; History; Political science; Psychology; Data mining","score_opus":0.08422213531943488,"score_gpt":0.32476818725921147,"score_spread":0.24054605193977657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765085058","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019542117,0.0016151281,0.00082462427,0.33636582,0.5882589,0.00041249229,0.0064124595,0.0009725664,0.045595884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21604303,0.0035981613,0.003716244,0.091679595,0.040363602,0.0005005989,0.0018352048,0.0004768094,0.6417868],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986939,0.00008647013,0.00017329828,0.0002223094,0.00041794468,0.000406042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930489,0.0010094318,0.0005892005,0.00075856847,0.0038607435,0.0007331293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000925194,0.0012657088,0.0023410565,0.0016461931,0.009893307,0.0024843437,0.004100967,0.013204543,0.049402513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0183463,0.0007956662,0.0007667526,0.0021805333,0.0033362713,0.0015308005,0.0014186971,0.01278964,0.016270537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006973521,0.000022689985,0.0012569812,0.000084938394,0.000018326205,0.0041464893,0.00044704994,0.00008571706,0.00008839189,0.001593815,0.98438144,0.0078043044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007003186,0.000035992558,0.014401968,0.00034023315,0.000053517477,0.00615749,0.006302317,0.0008282458,0.00054942636,0.0011950774,0.9699753,0.00009050807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36705282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52536356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6329472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009190441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012484525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72983265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765180794","doi":"","title":"Catalyst for Change","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship (California Digital Library)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Class (philosophy); Socialization; Femininity; Media literacy; Masculinity; Gender studies; Hammer; Sociology; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Aesthetics; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Computer science; History; Art; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.02712076436071464,"score_gpt":0.263214728640074,"score_spread":0.23609396427935936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765180794","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013558198,0.004050236,0.008445273,0.7214752,0.022809798,0.00048452395,0.00040155175,0.0007211978,0.22805409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4975365,0.0048917066,0.017710973,0.28343037,0.006436727,0.0013648283,0.00080533745,0.00076281565,0.18706076],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766658,0.008366556,0.0009579045,0.003227586,0.0059864777,0.004795725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9673372,0.0049656346,0.0014455988,0.003846603,0.008633218,0.01377178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018065851,0.0009055509,0.0008223445,0.0020763385,0.0068846904,0.019254085,0.0031268634,0.011138398,0.05967451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045899373,0.00040717312,0.0011550627,0.0012783556,0.0107627055,0.012867818,0.016729118,0.016708322,0.011055688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001373739,0.0004233917,0.004650268,0.00054373743,0.00009596923,0.0010797837,0.011435428,0.0002739327,0.001028037,0.38769978,0.47018814,0.12244415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027845395,0.00006791926,0.0011901256,0.0003548406,0.000018021683,0.00018998302,0.010028899,0.00017734087,0.0003075224,0.047911685,0.9397017,0.000024124096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023190195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027421075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05967451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008185025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02441308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1996311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767145264","doi":"","title":"Two Richard II films, directed by Rupert Goold (2012) and Gregory Doran (2013)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Early modern literary studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history","score_opus":0.028723768743421387,"score_gpt":0.30645579958661356,"score_spread":0.2777320308431922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767145264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071795836,0.051322203,0.0017803556,0.11429618,0.029093187,0.00030205504,0.0018343205,0.00016999381,0.7294059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32013756,0.031209491,0.003700605,0.04147397,0.009533102,0.00043633024,0.0019607279,0.00069263927,0.5908556],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999553,0.00014867168,0.000011990556,0.000057347675,0.00013930429,0.00008955671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907744,0.0003864093,0.00011159126,0.000045687768,0.00021155429,0.00016735113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005520444,0.00069665076,0.00020468618,0.0015222374,0.004350723,0.0029647877,0.0004957204,0.0021898784,0.00659569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002921256,0.00024972396,0.00036005367,0.001234271,0.0021595375,0.001666108,0.0013513725,0.0042507346,0.0014686295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013070914,0.000058357702,0.00056589016,0.0003503244,0.000015788144,0.00074207474,0.032026418,0.00006264989,0.0028274104,0.033462346,0.9061526,0.023605408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010250264,0.00002193873,0.0042051394,0.00018084045,0.000008489764,0.0003080906,0.011275356,0.000021741651,0.0005739747,0.0006517789,0.9827252,0.00001735579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037757523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13318855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037757523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028402251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010102374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07507551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768440282","doi":"10.21083/csieci.v12i1.3725","title":"Judging the Singular: Towards a Contingent Practice of Improvisation in Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Improvisation; Tacit knowledge; Foregrounding; Contingency; Sociology; Process (computing); Psychology; Autopoiesis; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics; Visual arts","score_opus":0.06743266098247948,"score_gpt":0.4458394996336083,"score_spread":0.37840683865112884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768440282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21781912,0.0051541915,0.23003648,0.07110356,0.00081443705,0.00033308618,0.000023682782,0.0003605273,0.47435486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98343706,0.0003857033,0.011159535,0.0006775688,0.000075902266,0.000062005194,0.0000050186395,0.00006063264,0.004136607],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94395417,0.045407437,0.0011990161,0.0031679121,0.0047655576,0.0015059144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9296563,0.055726867,0.00333326,0.0056049963,0.0037633826,0.0019151891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030687366,0.0005668492,0.0006515585,0.0029643646,0.015058011,0.019151157,0.0033310414,0.006082977,0.0040998533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06508057,0.00048300857,0.00048801038,0.0013472898,0.12234504,0.016467936,0.013334931,0.008875142,0.0006208811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017120823,0.000019405763,0.00031578355,0.000061991996,0.0000036994538,0.00022554479,0.17781818,0.00017674871,0.0004612815,0.81036466,0.00070864294,0.009826896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002388722,0.000056134937,0.0005170415,0.00064674026,0.000009235932,0.00028653556,0.15634653,0.0013725613,0.0015410444,0.77338904,0.06576579,0.000045458855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029627078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031501707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030687366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007659921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073455865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16229224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769452953","doi":"","title":"Immigration Detention in Canada: C’est arrivé près de chez vous","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"E-Artexte (Artexte)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Refugee; Exhibition; Immigration; Power (physics); Immigration detention; Humanities; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Art history; Cartography; Media studies; Political science; Art; History; Geography","score_opus":0.014444230683066654,"score_gpt":0.2444136873843262,"score_spread":0.22996945670125954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769452953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10102117,0.06178993,0.0007204713,0.2031841,0.008698644,0.000097170494,0.0008457716,0.00015517158,0.62348753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4506108,0.037737414,0.0006226507,0.022064261,0.0006573972,0.00004833766,0.00039581954,0.00014507156,0.48771828],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930453,0.000069990056,0.000009969431,0.000056405315,0.00024828923,0.00031079695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993832,0.000085694955,0.000028364606,0.000011241322,0.00024703002,0.00024442436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046350356,0.0003722127,0.00022141363,0.0006927866,0.021940144,0.0050807334,0.0011214387,0.0018665529,0.010566469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013664282,0.00018445133,0.00019000743,0.0015965719,0.004530294,0.0013805709,0.0017315116,0.00408048,0.00079262065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028484097,0.00003532319,0.003397097,0.00024861703,0.000009711358,0.0018522587,0.14122407,0.00023277027,0.00037883007,0.096786074,0.70473623,0.05107054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027268725,0.000008254885,0.004030937,0.00020386242,0.0000056117187,0.0002276259,0.07864452,0.0000584851,0.00012741094,0.0007685636,0.9159038,0.000018207196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99198383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0641443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0641443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16272423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46540165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770289378","doi":"10.14453/ltc.744","title":"Law As…Forest: Eco-logic, Stories and Spirits in Indigenous Jurisprudence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law/text/culture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Indigenous; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Law; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Ecology","score_opus":0.015779527883645113,"score_gpt":0.31504366354852686,"score_spread":0.29926413566488175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770289378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24191466,0.016601207,0.020654516,0.102707535,0.0010744027,0.000058352205,0.000042735297,0.00014035717,0.6168062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897642,0.001024082,0.0010753955,0.0014047521,0.000108371634,0.000027305687,0.0000057817574,0.000026102198,0.0065641357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99452955,0.0041889404,0.00007674251,0.00027885562,0.0005237606,0.0004021783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957807,0.0032466338,0.00024301175,0.00025729625,0.00022916443,0.00024319538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004799101,0.00033558664,0.00035710356,0.0015167833,0.01179526,0.009472679,0.0011563225,0.0024067974,0.0016396763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005531536,0.00023821194,0.0002480231,0.0015051177,0.094787635,0.010930232,0.0052331043,0.0044163545,0.0001848311],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006806658,0.000011524667,0.00024505067,0.000032095104,0.0000021178485,0.00017030492,0.23133844,0.00007658593,0.00012297691,0.76301193,0.0013233046,0.0036589338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011312555,0.000031528074,0.0009707984,0.00028452725,0.000008665211,0.00028555034,0.2601223,0.0005258655,0.00030201802,0.5426445,0.19479072,0.000022253138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010310821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011972836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01179526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058574695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030381065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042499125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771406952","doi":"10.53386/nilq.v68i3.41","title":"Encountering settler colonialism through legal objects: a painted drum and handwritten treaty from Manitoulin Island","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Indigenous; Colonialism; Performative utterance; Agency (philosophy); Law; Sovereignty; Drum; Property (philosophy); Sociology; History; Political science; Archaeology; Aesthetics; Art; Politics; Social science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011475371907875679,"score_gpt":0.26991253659377523,"score_spread":0.25843716468589956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771406952","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9281636,0.0006137615,0.00044229257,0.0030836463,0.000097785225,0.000029736386,0.000030040317,0.000018440986,0.06752063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744445,0.00043546213,0.0003842548,0.00048055864,0.000030317977,0.000018223907,0.000023270395,0.000044815264,0.024138657],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987583,0.0006373993,0.000018228571,0.000103017715,0.00020739065,0.00027567497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991916,0.00039419622,0.00007485268,0.000059633043,0.000073888186,0.0002059897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011941002,0.00044814363,0.000480493,0.0008739192,0.02228842,0.006966447,0.0010429472,0.0019185935,0.006177666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024774687,0.00042022375,0.0001783915,0.0012877788,0.019447178,0.0023362627,0.0069690673,0.0034979293,0.00053039327],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018297875,0.000009196014,0.0006965179,0.000023183287,0.000002669216,0.0016320497,0.990404,0.000014613166,0.0009138636,0.0034085354,0.0007182625,0.0021588467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000398935,0.00001991214,0.002817542,0.00006218537,0.0000040046925,0.0004000187,0.94687647,0.00003317891,0.00026928395,0.00032066306,0.049179908,0.000012845288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22268204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51777124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77731794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008531076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003784974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4427718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2771615732","doi":"10.53386/nilq.v68i3.37","title":"The Pop-Up Museum of Legal Objects project: an experiment in ‘socio-legal design’","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Socio-Legal Studies Association","keywords":"Underpinning; Object (grammar); Perspective (graphical); Event (particle physics); Visual arts; Sociology; Engineering; Art; Computer science; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.02676973324340739,"score_gpt":0.31685019346887233,"score_spread":0.29008046022546496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2771615732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674772,0.00013038906,0.0047930507,0.0016258758,0.00008422461,0.0019986609,0.00015282744,0.0001179417,0.023619851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97247,0.00015139398,0.015229595,0.00084705255,0.000046623532,0.0031592075,0.0001454375,0.00012287029,0.007827933],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807308,0.014676039,0.00038498445,0.0013494592,0.0013901311,0.0014686169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697547,0.02156327,0.0008700835,0.0041345935,0.0008737184,0.0028036449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019325607,0.0008814104,0.00081667316,0.0011034732,0.012473307,0.005056125,0.0032529752,0.0044000377,0.012666112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027733957,0.0011118922,0.0007904868,0.0011679033,0.01959805,0.0061309724,0.012081254,0.0046668877,0.0013074366],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00082510366,0.0064791306,0.0048644524,0.00052366813,0.00003461821,0.0019146675,0.9197376,0.00057510263,0.003616575,0.023557922,0.0049905614,0.03288065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014881856,0.00843748,0.014651393,0.00040461367,0.00006639335,0.0009895624,0.77987075,0.002345571,0.0056852214,0.019917311,0.1659139,0.00022963878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005281695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009131999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019325607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029067474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036796622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10220474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773655713","doi":"10.26443/crae.v44i1.43","title":"Review of \"Printopolis,\" edited by Tara Cooper and Jenn Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Review of Art Education / Revue canadienne d’éducation artistique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Cooper pair; Political science; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.021952258966481144,"score_gpt":0.31928606999424697,"score_spread":0.29733381102776585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773655713","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011664743,0.8987868,0.00023551815,0.029675115,0.028958831,0.000013863174,0.00023166675,0.00003488221,0.04194669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037136704,0.87243325,0.0002859242,0.019422933,0.017511543,0.000028509472,0.00041032446,0.00010569174,0.08608825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848,0.00022511973,0.00008132058,0.00016310642,0.00091517816,0.00013523069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608,0.00091077463,0.00016805937,0.0001369619,0.002336324,0.0003679106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015775978,0.0008497459,0.0011875661,0.0053530396,0.002110736,0.0061192014,0.0012587305,0.0021253675,0.030857714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006936582,0.000580628,0.00054326456,0.0068040765,0.0029189554,0.0047044614,0.0017527079,0.0044239173,0.010853869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065692598,0.000004599669,0.00004084791,0.0006115144,0.000005557183,0.000023313203,0.00008460938,0.000024342671,0.00003649723,0.006179656,0.9443921,0.04859028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012688428,0.0000019539905,0.00017774345,0.00066547445,0.0000029023722,0.000046378205,0.000057406254,0.0000050455797,0.000013868791,0.0006633527,0.99836177,0.000002825454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07041075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1628439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07041075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007270941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016306415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14000183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773755964","doi":"10.21552/edpl/2017/4/4","title":"Forewords ∙ The Future of Privacy Lies in Forgetting the Past","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Data Protection Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Forgetting; Psychology; Computer security; Computer science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.08522663098042371,"score_gpt":0.34645375669758216,"score_spread":0.26122712571715845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773755964","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009114226,0.030169262,0.021935914,0.64568067,0.012737245,0.000030476673,0.00026526806,0.00016395799,0.27990302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5039297,0.05557054,0.01230161,0.17246021,0.019767564,0.00013983234,0.00035919037,0.0003808717,0.23509052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99534154,0.0017111485,0.00019552154,0.00064552884,0.0018576256,0.0002486004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98807156,0.007866069,0.0008309052,0.00120452,0.0016643362,0.00036261327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042723096,0.00040192888,0.00041145194,0.0009438256,0.0038407918,0.010805005,0.001250606,0.004976857,0.019564167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015455568,0.00024096797,0.00034534556,0.0014216616,0.010715249,0.015396336,0.0029457146,0.0072780442,0.0070934896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002690792,0.0000141487335,0.0004523986,0.00016169006,0.000011419539,0.00008509025,0.0028210233,0.00012434124,0.00030408532,0.8942089,0.06284694,0.038943022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040291625,0.000015722499,0.00033568096,0.00046862694,0.000009307954,0.00036841613,0.0023106202,0.00022499038,0.00093337864,0.31755129,0.67775846,0.000019582722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018787509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001941425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019564167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024346681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038511923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0654487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2774722504","doi":"10.53386/nilq.v68i3.49","title":"When is a Haida sphinx: thinking about law with things","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sphinx; Law; Materiality (auditing); Scholarship; Philosophy of law; Legal history; Sociology; Object (grammar); Constitution; Commercial law; Comparative law; Political science; Aesthetics; History; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.010322335931447062,"score_gpt":0.25306440372926775,"score_spread":0.24274206779782068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2774722504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06914877,0.010964559,0.014565115,0.22872633,0.0024884162,0.00010639516,0.00010616608,0.00016292352,0.6737313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8868158,0.0047820956,0.0077327862,0.012354777,0.00030673947,0.000065845124,0.00005016346,0.00014797389,0.08774382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990338,0.0004129738,0.000028352257,0.00014966895,0.00021425229,0.00016095555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902725,0.0003669277,0.000087470886,0.00010003389,0.00019789359,0.00022046686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023074283,0.00031319933,0.00029415256,0.00082043617,0.008676986,0.0071822014,0.0007075702,0.0017969538,0.0077885697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003421865,0.00027550623,0.0002456129,0.0007147306,0.031146724,0.014676421,0.0023574964,0.003999731,0.0012218719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025036506,0.000017670824,0.001951633,0.00011175751,0.000008503778,0.0006181668,0.16078813,0.00010379443,0.00069556036,0.77435815,0.030024642,0.031296887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010198739,0.00004609217,0.0033387726,0.0005230235,0.000013641475,0.00044814777,0.16072905,0.0002505172,0.00051549275,0.2869398,0.54713744,0.000047879625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032179616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06376014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9678204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070015537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033822013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06398463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2775116659","doi":"10.7202/1043649ar","title":"LE DROIT À L’ÉGALITÉ DANS L’EXERCICE DE LA LIBERTÉ DE TESTER AU QUÉBEC : L’EXEMPLE DU TESTAMENT DE LA PERSONNE SOURDE QUI NE PEUT NI PARLER, NI LIRE, NI ÉCRIRE","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013560137839683448,"score_gpt":0.2687686356842075,"score_spread":0.25520849784452404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775116659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51946646,0.0044162283,0.0029655632,0.1315721,0.0007048379,0.000112271424,0.00022726931,0.000050195278,0.34048513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9137745,0.0006769328,0.0006514188,0.0077901157,0.000032776406,0.000030117104,0.000033826873,0.000024716404,0.07698559],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953056,0.0015117594,0.00007349553,0.00027123254,0.0010256226,0.0018123041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947767,0.0011368719,0.00022911334,0.00019380744,0.0015057601,0.002157663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003521758,0.00029283462,0.00026216358,0.0004900182,0.020761074,0.004284746,0.001364627,0.0038388292,0.0077212146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047545815,0.00023790641,0.00023842597,0.0007639541,0.0142187895,0.0011895134,0.003114086,0.005483247,0.00049325905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000146114,0.00024854016,0.04100367,0.00014358366,0.00003717873,0.0031615137,0.4941115,0.0004260045,0.003133662,0.24480991,0.12064807,0.09213032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048029247,0.00017952363,0.12309637,0.00046476684,0.00003966317,0.00086760597,0.28725585,0.00057934853,0.0011053334,0.0074101333,0.57878953,0.00016381394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9706519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99055254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040486623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040486623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055637326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29375237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777497800","doi":"10.1177/1464700117743049","title":"The digital witness: The role of digital evidence in criminal justice responses to sexual violence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Theory","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Sexual violence; Witness; Criminology; Criminal justice; Plaintiff; Psychology; Economic Justice; Digital evidence; Law; Sociology; Political science; Digital forensics; Computer security","score_opus":0.04023615001260964,"score_gpt":0.34087790615537905,"score_spread":0.3006417561427694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777497800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3753148,0.016544454,0.015118557,0.17023346,0.001428837,0.00011294836,0.00009597804,0.00006061115,0.42109033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863635,0.003849107,0.00092287257,0.0032252683,0.00018400823,0.000035229954,0.000011758677,0.000013932726,0.005394279],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936773,0.004981426,0.0001766222,0.00029338006,0.00048335973,0.0003878578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97236407,0.023352422,0.0019527841,0.00084710325,0.0006658419,0.00081773754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006358582,0.00025210404,0.00019151527,0.0019735517,0.005856434,0.01182407,0.0010563547,0.003492419,0.008757607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031362653,0.00030497913,0.00027116158,0.0013413964,0.020561295,0.010447491,0.010205528,0.0034310303,0.00047981009],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071939816,0.0000848603,0.013485715,0.0004908371,0.000024185852,0.0034595837,0.28593627,0.00031939973,0.0006937311,0.5811693,0.010075897,0.104188316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003332938,0.0001423969,0.010323281,0.004094811,0.00005704609,0.004273942,0.59892684,0.0010749312,0.001504156,0.17491588,0.20459646,0.000056887133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034486596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004506589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01182407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026009218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023609092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033627808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777653771","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-66568-9_4","title":"Is Multiculturalism Good for Animals?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"˜The œPalgrave Macmillan animal ethics series","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Multiculturalism; Anthropocentrism; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Political science; Political economy; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0784148094689278,"score_gpt":0.34265943261815107,"score_spread":0.26424462314922326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777653771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04834181,0.011622943,0.002450089,0.08233314,0.001832732,0.000019127925,0.000028576294,0.000024366915,0.85334724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85856813,0.005661021,0.0026012585,0.036642626,0.0010651065,0.000088355395,0.00003959404,0.00007897544,0.095254965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956118,0.002705798,0.00009697984,0.00032610685,0.0005892453,0.0006699936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968451,0.0012868044,0.00030168355,0.00042887486,0.0004616011,0.0006759311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061506075,0.0003280193,0.00035780962,0.00057974184,0.0064582033,0.006044637,0.0007147933,0.0029234416,0.005817075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046282723,0.00025711503,0.0003081494,0.0005892363,0.033533935,0.0048734676,0.005178278,0.0040208856,0.0007756326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027884029,0.000043137283,0.0021232036,0.000114103066,0.000029197696,0.0002271718,0.048401132,0.000043802935,0.0004193766,0.8978854,0.019704482,0.030981205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001276235,0.00005005781,0.004758756,0.00054383173,0.000024579038,0.00061613845,0.037488565,0.000061021034,0.0005394815,0.38117215,0.57470775,0.000024979247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041251243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012187661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064582033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002162217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028004555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032527864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W277852187","doi":"","title":"THE RIGHT TO SELF IMAGE: THE CONSENT GIVEN TO CREATE OR USE A PERSON’S IMAGE IN THE NEW CIVIL CODE. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Law; Civil code; Autonomy; Personality; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.06233342906219248,"score_gpt":0.326990064573646,"score_spread":0.2646566355114535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W277852187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016226467,0.0072708116,0.01167958,0.09428455,0.002137998,0.00050380995,0.00053636264,0.00012816773,0.8672322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6463812,0.0073024523,0.010828326,0.067348965,0.0038949049,0.0013223393,0.00069607794,0.0002281887,0.26199758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841361,0.0063264146,0.0011745391,0.0017432618,0.0046139867,0.0020055962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99012226,0.004973078,0.000751235,0.0015947622,0.0018882273,0.0006703006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011849994,0.00062219106,0.000552639,0.0010395462,0.0058194464,0.0074650412,0.0015695601,0.014768365,0.015687715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028633367,0.00053384976,0.0006450837,0.00090035406,0.01845247,0.006246614,0.004674848,0.0107211545,0.0036571021],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025362238,0.000038218488,0.00052385975,0.000070643684,0.0000044584954,0.00032019377,0.0044073933,0.0001583833,0.00031790163,0.94702893,0.034092076,0.013012535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038228205,0.000100128906,0.0026825175,0.0012047706,0.000024374245,0.0015205115,0.0034089084,0.0004957395,0.0008365566,0.28971198,0.6998704,0.00010587466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029703962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027476368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029703962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055769044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011292822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062669516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778626131","doi":"10.21083/irss.v42i0.3969","title":"Ian A. Olson. Bludie Harlaw: Realities, Myths, Ballads","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Review of Scottish Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Ballad; Mythology; History; Classics; Literature; Art; Poetry","score_opus":0.06615952461695346,"score_gpt":0.42138181914889794,"score_spread":0.3552222945319445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778626131","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015560727,0.91183454,0.00031289787,0.06534545,0.0072843577,0.000023026392,0.0002163504,0.000095231895,0.014732466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008860399,0.8166235,0.0009950615,0.022171648,0.0056191334,0.00009314043,0.00033015056,0.00025501466,0.14505194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879515,0.00028120913,0.000110983834,0.00012781777,0.00057043915,0.00011441896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99570185,0.0017064804,0.00046726805,0.000115562245,0.0013779323,0.0006307833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002202087,0.0023496521,0.0014679792,0.003491292,0.0030207254,0.004198584,0.0020053145,0.0060192063,0.068098694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00708534,0.0013248584,0.0005832571,0.0055615297,0.0021382081,0.009727644,0.0027008334,0.0059046475,0.03478786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033112436,0.000009598562,0.00008127179,0.0004086881,0.0000056269905,0.00005926208,0.0003895685,0.000024828252,0.00004640214,0.0020574366,0.9498113,0.047072824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019700585,0.00001962103,0.0010203691,0.0018335596,0.000013439309,0.00029607,0.0017186467,0.000050091727,0.00009674992,0.0056731086,0.9892291,0.000029597077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03446256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05660692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068098694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021172161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003417672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22781283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779409701","doi":"10.29173/alr1419","title":"Universal Jurisprudence and the Case for Legal Humanism","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Jurisprudence; Sympathy; Humanity; Political philosophy; Law; Economic Justice; Philosophy; Politics; Sociology; Order (exchange); Legal realism; Epistemology; Political science; Legal research; Psychology","score_opus":0.021163441772529358,"score_gpt":0.3157287766201999,"score_spread":0.2945653348476705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779409701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061954424,0.056567907,0.014612217,0.34120524,0.0011787527,0.000050386745,0.000047446003,0.000072400624,0.52431124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663165,0.004228184,0.001829731,0.014438147,0.00050421985,0.000046031375,0.000018933426,0.000027895381,0.012590437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98760486,0.0058543757,0.00023707496,0.0010108761,0.0023998325,0.002892954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914607,0.005212874,0.0004934485,0.0008106776,0.00089004694,0.001132175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011345988,0.00035680938,0.0008693214,0.0020000318,0.011111629,0.0119487345,0.0023194894,0.008473373,0.0037115682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014550751,0.00048631008,0.00053498877,0.0014972284,0.12067264,0.008648719,0.008111221,0.01006574,0.0003295194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016190407,0.0000028505106,0.000037721,0.000008150973,9.833557e-7,0.000026369638,0.0007851883,0.00004227381,0.000010443115,0.997488,0.00082290673,0.00077343313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009952938,0.0000040231416,0.00021785281,0.00006263262,0.0000025184631,0.000037431902,0.0011411732,0.000094402756,0.000029208515,0.9669384,0.031456865,0.000005436707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07564313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05858704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07564313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027882712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0202784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20230418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780914625","doi":"10.1386/jcs.6.2.181_1","title":"Curating and the End of the Professions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Curatorial Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Relation (database); Identity (music); Sociology; Work (physics); Media studies; Aesthetics; Social science; Public relations; Political science; Art; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.062266445883596415,"score_gpt":0.40445058878946333,"score_spread":0.3421841429058669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780914625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10977622,0.007436381,0.017175073,0.11495539,0.0012944997,0.00007071564,0.00006584129,0.0001781802,0.74904764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9653539,0.0008622656,0.0015689469,0.00597817,0.0002972101,0.000041064675,0.000019865007,0.000116586,0.025762009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96565974,0.021184452,0.0012252387,0.0030622715,0.00572157,0.0031466808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93636733,0.0324355,0.0055550663,0.0091428375,0.010361547,0.0061376723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02319086,0.0005089003,0.00080647354,0.0042590033,0.032742552,0.019919515,0.0027302655,0.008281637,0.010714329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041104108,0.00048301037,0.0005917148,0.0025813081,0.10587062,0.017316462,0.022359418,0.009835975,0.0018303388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019600067,0.000023926994,0.0005899815,0.00006246836,0.0000034004017,0.00015972786,0.16632484,0.00005183582,0.00022002352,0.8197159,0.0050581815,0.0077700447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015644855,0.00004159316,0.0010897315,0.0006609877,0.0000067151773,0.00032285598,0.11244209,0.00028135194,0.0005859708,0.3951356,0.48938254,0.000034884975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008796337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078887185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032742552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0125119565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014442537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12264645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781033852","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2017.4.3","title":"Resisting Body Oppression: An Aesthetic Approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Oppression; Dehumanization; Social psychology; Psychology; Identity (music); Aesthetics; Attractiveness; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.04783349570777248,"score_gpt":0.3312543271267316,"score_spread":0.28342083141895913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781033852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036701676,0.0041719144,0.055328727,0.041286387,0.0012517639,0.000064835614,0.00001705013,0.00011263619,0.8610649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92886835,0.0020469937,0.01498952,0.0053857984,0.00077137776,0.00014302076,0.000015541727,0.00016170375,0.047617774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446243,0.0032039348,0.000092100345,0.00032468673,0.0014776824,0.00043912267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971616,0.0013176484,0.00032376597,0.0004364166,0.00047127667,0.0002892463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005465248,0.0007541451,0.00035787447,0.002281165,0.006375745,0.0067934156,0.0017911923,0.003428201,0.0050419183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061460994,0.0002794887,0.0006179223,0.0006150546,0.069656774,0.0071212337,0.006795095,0.00502094,0.00070580066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015273326,0.00003226771,0.00022970822,0.00007880588,0.0000065371037,0.00014172915,0.019538911,0.00028531326,0.00066032837,0.96494526,0.0025847799,0.011481059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002255858,0.00008504641,0.0007775365,0.00038625987,0.000018179926,0.0006831231,0.025081659,0.00070816575,0.0014694934,0.72298664,0.24774645,0.000034896053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008755882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016237785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067934156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002328468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028903365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782057639","doi":"","title":"Proving Aboriginal/Native Title in Canada and Australia: A Question of Future and Society Association of Australia and New Zealand Conference, Disruption, Temporality and Law: the Future of Law and Society Scholarship Legitimacy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Scholarship; Law; Political science; Association (psychology); Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015709008232407284,"score_gpt":0.25927087408406135,"score_spread":0.24356186585165407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782057639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32373223,0.0086408835,0.0017396462,0.25711727,0.0010902709,0.00008304209,0.00029026388,0.00006397857,0.40724236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713551,0.0013100491,0.00054302486,0.006990701,0.00012450576,0.000023955792,0.000034821052,0.000039947437,0.019577935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848632,0.0040816455,0.0006047972,0.0012651838,0.004355559,0.004829589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9412692,0.023400664,0.0027737068,0.002327752,0.020228684,0.010000025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023290236,0.00020720236,0.00091433263,0.0033972696,0.04693577,0.026415866,0.004473138,0.006738,0.008946457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059508584,0.0005603611,0.00034658634,0.0036738943,0.064957865,0.011545083,0.009498432,0.010911299,0.000372591],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004071296,0.000045466782,0.00947822,0.00010994481,0.0000247442,0.000300132,0.2730382,0.0001917285,0.00013050169,0.6696168,0.022642916,0.024380565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026021247,0.000038794475,0.028168393,0.001144423,0.00008426102,0.00017282777,0.58819926,0.00055035285,0.00048932177,0.12644148,0.2545371,0.00014781728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97077256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.979079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0954346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0954346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28051484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6924297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2784680444","doi":"","title":"Evidence and the Archive: Ethics, Aesthetics and Emotion ed. by Katherine Biber and Trish Luker (review)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archivaria","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.03965961523320533,"score_gpt":0.34287057957369577,"score_spread":0.30321096434049044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2784680444","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000017221737,0.9914984,0.00007878586,0.0073739327,0.00065143773,0.0000026835505,0.000007173996,0.000001944448,0.00036834533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00080150546,0.9946576,0.00021549893,0.002618984,0.0011731951,0.0000236498,0.000011665115,0.0000060795196,0.000491842],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918247,0.0049578245,0.00079822325,0.00034275753,0.0018486363,0.00022794772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692601,0.025541458,0.001956797,0.00049847545,0.002235233,0.0005079472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01443409,0.0014383607,0.003311804,0.008848635,0.0018508751,0.010317947,0.0025233438,0.0066011157,0.007526094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038683657,0.0013032517,0.0012883174,0.008535291,0.0108372485,0.014406405,0.005124184,0.0070132236,0.0027425182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112382804,0.000034739915,0.00034332872,0.038140126,0.00026038813,0.00029328134,0.0027127892,0.00024275541,0.00019715786,0.062500514,0.43245223,0.46271038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032455548,0.000032946784,0.0012123585,0.08766233,0.00012763056,0.001209307,0.0021197996,0.00006712125,0.0001417312,0.034225985,0.87311673,0.000051535793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007610877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016383357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01443409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049636345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011024322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07633567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2787964877","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v8n3p276","title":"The Lawyer’s Discourse in the Courtroom: A Contrastive Study in English and Arabic","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jargon; Linguistics; Arabic; Plaintiff; Contrastive analysis; Psychology; Contrast (vision); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.017201503042112102,"score_gpt":0.3465249607563296,"score_spread":0.3293234577142175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2787964877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955865,0.00011839296,0.00019709319,0.00012962772,0.000008309052,0.000027850354,0.000010865847,0.0000010639653,0.0039203893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988017,0.00013523415,0.00021420394,0.00009599226,0.000018013823,0.000043250395,0.000013678159,0.0000040203936,0.0006738969],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974636,0.0016151944,0.00017165366,0.0002303192,0.00032658654,0.00019257439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98893774,0.009015227,0.00092452957,0.00022544773,0.00053528644,0.00036173174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034503546,0.00039052436,0.00049177924,0.0019825536,0.004425179,0.0040226406,0.0006810903,0.0013953642,0.003016882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017602723,0.00038723572,0.000207437,0.0014619277,0.0052201427,0.0039755576,0.0026838137,0.0021071658,0.00038617125],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016141342,0.0004374486,0.009612821,0.00014813543,0.000010645273,0.0008714883,0.9739153,0.000035131732,0.0071817786,0.0033668391,0.0001481357,0.0041108215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049170725,0.00045680912,0.051877677,0.00018365709,0.000028617782,0.0010611977,0.93583876,0.00034369266,0.0025404026,0.0008738207,0.006710716,0.00003534505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039201733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005434652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004425179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016903204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007106568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018247426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789076049","doi":"10.3917/delib.003.0055","title":"Vers une architecture judiciaire managériale : l’exemple du futur palais de justice de Lille","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Délibérée","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.013105211467151219,"score_gpt":0.2723721040110801,"score_spread":0.2592668925439289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789076049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055994634,0.0075387596,0.07210644,0.0898895,0.0010593104,0.00014193909,0.00017246765,0.00039538415,0.77270156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77795434,0.0026706217,0.025611922,0.005943511,0.00072801206,0.00023268565,0.00011077519,0.00033596277,0.18641216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898461,0.005682072,0.00028707553,0.0010467332,0.0018737153,0.001264328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974298,0.0013931887,0.00016047858,0.0003983658,0.00037523243,0.0002429082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069337874,0.0011784143,0.00078486075,0.0014336435,0.013429619,0.022978334,0.0016587811,0.011217592,0.009838687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008573233,0.0007189983,0.0015081507,0.0022380308,0.023528265,0.008869292,0.0045302077,0.01305259,0.0017628663],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000078847615,0.000009432341,0.000111465866,0.00001197248,0.0000057231446,0.00011072698,0.0033538674,0.00036843933,0.000095519375,0.9923498,0.0014647198,0.0021103965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077219316,0.000049922386,0.0014125076,0.0002629417,0.000015904801,0.00032937844,0.006107459,0.0019566712,0.0005280308,0.49025044,0.4989327,0.000076822675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12760647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12694256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12760647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024617782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014630222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25372738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789407380","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.30.1.144","title":"Locating Oneself in One's Research: Learning and Engaging with Law in the Coast Salish World","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Operationalization; Law; Sociology; Political science; Indigenous rights; Commission; Legal education; Human rights; Geography; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06969613477776965,"score_gpt":0.3153607896416976,"score_spread":0.24566465486392797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789407380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8307863,0.0055663823,0.0038962215,0.08295056,0.00057030935,0.00028821113,0.000054544642,0.0001423317,0.07574504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646724,0.0047526252,0.0054533724,0.007966786,0.00011652936,0.0002014242,0.00004998481,0.000097534,0.016689405],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864792,0.009824561,0.00022827172,0.0005738822,0.0011568473,0.0017372565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871372,0.006997764,0.000904258,0.00050704274,0.0008087933,0.0036449747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014964978,0.0007565118,0.0006915643,0.0023533157,0.045019004,0.013132792,0.0038826833,0.0041233636,0.0053345123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015314103,0.0007483328,0.00038672643,0.002113855,0.05908542,0.009580479,0.018978907,0.007297964,0.00071944593],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001976986,0.000013467488,0.00047099244,0.000025268839,0.0000011634888,0.00025534374,0.9929202,0.0000063076977,0.00013639507,0.0018524943,0.0011054842,0.0032108712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001621038,0.00000930035,0.0005596324,0.000063390195,0.000002245263,0.00009602794,0.9832723,0.000017029104,0.000040460454,0.0009386529,0.014991466,0.000007871974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18174887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4079983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81825113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015038977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023224503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36138195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789647646","doi":"","title":"In the Supreme Court of British Columbia, between Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium ... [et al.], plaintiffs, and the Minister [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Supreme court; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.010276598733833488,"score_gpt":0.22955015954169863,"score_spread":0.21927356080786514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789647646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017135955,0.014674509,0.00088068965,0.14623217,0.003871439,0.00006423614,0.0011175841,0.00017561161,0.81584793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09904437,0.002655921,0.000545114,0.057592593,0.0003205052,0.000041077434,0.00027645327,0.0001060909,0.83941793],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848527,0.00012601202,0.000034318604,0.00014791284,0.00061125,0.00059531676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990753,0.00021289405,0.000024271367,0.000031,0.0004659707,0.00019052459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009132583,0.00041814664,0.00037645194,0.00093090837,0.03550756,0.009220868,0.0011862004,0.008059391,0.026257006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004124115,0.00058578944,0.00035787636,0.0018447768,0.00492021,0.0023965633,0.0018577415,0.009175816,0.0037833273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002273802,0.000013503782,0.0012264078,0.000045317953,0.0000054033703,0.00034208244,0.00483987,0.00004661949,0.00021404288,0.10582324,0.8724651,0.014955511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009275676,0.0000055931355,0.0039097485,0.00017176564,0.000016437649,0.000092086775,0.009732603,0.00008011204,0.00030296142,0.0066097644,0.97903866,0.00003095601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95366687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99222976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046333134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03065199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05265393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22239679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790078636","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0047","title":"Transformative legal technology and the rule of law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Economic Justice; Cognition; Rule of law; Law; Legal profession; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.006344534758098222,"score_gpt":0.22562990034735253,"score_spread":0.21928536558925432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790078636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10072213,0.00573067,0.071334034,0.017232979,0.00024209674,0.00005672668,0.00009457175,0.00020564499,0.8043811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773661,0.0013908384,0.008961526,0.0005705034,0.0001097667,0.00003689295,0.000032281667,0.00003224062,0.011499914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963258,0.0012989895,0.00017778913,0.00070262665,0.0011210588,0.00037364152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948137,0.0027039913,0.0006028681,0.0011542806,0.00045252097,0.00027263677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028568574,0.00024282758,0.0003467268,0.001362374,0.0016384762,0.0073542525,0.0009889577,0.0018133466,0.0050052945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077562993,0.00023915796,0.00035858274,0.0010260826,0.040355466,0.007540972,0.0026048806,0.002270339,0.0007575116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035936382,0.0000048166353,0.00009899561,0.000010200348,0.0000014092295,0.000020321713,0.0007186825,0.00030897427,0.00007119704,0.9951852,0.00021723553,0.0033593117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010045698,0.000009883194,0.00041003182,0.00003270005,0.0000031887266,0.000060803497,0.0004213055,0.00072577223,0.00024279265,0.9751956,0.022878531,0.00000937234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007112264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052133924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073542525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049671447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029376936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036039293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790514214","doi":"10.18432/ari29331","title":"Queer Emergencies, 5.26.2017","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Art/Research International A Transdisciplinary Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Poetry; Articulation (sociology); Subjectivity; Politics; Identity (music); Aesthetics; Temporality; Sociology; Art; Literature; Gender studies; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.12698821836669977,"score_gpt":0.4613604149562543,"score_spread":0.3343721965895545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790514214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003358805,0.032167528,0.0005109577,0.01976201,0.0119706,0.00008974701,0.0026485242,0.00027926092,0.9292126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049429294,0.014026251,0.00035141,0.010476033,0.0027895155,0.00013590379,0.0010676186,0.00025130622,0.92147267],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941444,0.00009272002,0.00003438227,0.000069808295,0.00021028977,0.00017834164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965763,0.00008302957,0.00003768279,0.000028854176,0.00010367933,0.000089198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008422129,0.00047189964,0.00021835114,0.0010846592,0.0037000915,0.0037597674,0.0005112389,0.0036036766,0.07834738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002465023,0.00029443987,0.00038393232,0.0007757387,0.0016393805,0.0020347452,0.0020999887,0.0038790244,0.02523148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000700826,0.000033586864,0.0010175591,0.00029913272,0.000005174695,0.0007284182,0.004766944,0.000085594,0.00035462,0.2225783,0.7124799,0.05758064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003574448,0.0000066652424,0.0009657428,0.00019509369,0.0000012583142,0.000100508594,0.0005914961,0.000012905774,0.00007567182,0.0016369388,0.9964051,0.000004996732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.067662984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11681825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07834738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036579014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029885932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26209813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790814016","doi":"10.1177/0267323118760323","title":"Trolling ourselves to death? Social media and post-truth politics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Communication","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Framing (construction); Mainstream; Journalism; Media studies; Focus (optics); Social media; Sociology; Political science; Law; History","score_opus":0.04357403452083161,"score_gpt":0.3170659802839342,"score_spread":0.27349194576310254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790814016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11751292,0.012629939,0.006422827,0.45185584,0.0019921751,0.00003179921,0.00011593394,0.00007976097,0.4093587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9713497,0.0026728627,0.00042055006,0.013870563,0.0016037062,0.000029174826,0.000024006615,0.00005550821,0.009973889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904392,0.006573851,0.00017711597,0.0006947742,0.0009405729,0.0011745662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976334,0.017817024,0.0021773383,0.0012044086,0.0012278309,0.0012394156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008568759,0.00025501664,0.00039575415,0.0021090566,0.007675043,0.019931499,0.0010509084,0.007676572,0.010821271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028659817,0.0003217367,0.00034481555,0.0017118411,0.03630135,0.029914951,0.0050448873,0.0072582955,0.001535116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003596131,0.000035870373,0.001289715,0.00004762496,0.000008514737,0.00015637337,0.02573695,0.000066932276,0.000092406015,0.9521048,0.009462571,0.010962201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031627384,0.000048257378,0.0028412843,0.0005036349,0.000016169484,0.00025106262,0.051229548,0.00040863955,0.0004826918,0.7829056,0.16123372,0.000047743353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024107276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015351212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019931499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034846496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017630275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045316517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790823523","doi":"10.29173/alr1442","title":"Still Crazy after All These Years: Section 88 of the Indian Act at Fifty","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Mainstream; Law; Mandate; Treaty; Political science; Cabinet (room); Confusion; Parliament; Section (typography); Enforcement; Repeal; Politics; History; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.013992020523984391,"score_gpt":0.2815640643124278,"score_spread":0.2675720437884434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790823523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038616866,0.14096183,0.0009951686,0.2632495,0.009558654,0.00008969151,0.0005999283,0.00015809803,0.5457703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3263249,0.05021943,0.0012507968,0.23854828,0.0020583172,0.00010270554,0.0006035957,0.00007382331,0.3808182],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721587,0.0004574719,0.000094112336,0.00018906115,0.0014248475,0.00061852817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814916,0.00061264506,0.00014566064,0.00009342003,0.00079996773,0.00019917577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018255562,0.00017685741,0.00024746376,0.0008823739,0.0045016226,0.0033473296,0.0009411169,0.0034291688,0.0043493435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004400871,0.00022670117,0.0003145486,0.0017017258,0.0026851632,0.0010667299,0.00067801017,0.0038136423,0.0009254298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003824273,0.000050775365,0.0032917943,0.0003907546,0.000016111935,0.00053303497,0.004607588,0.00010368759,0.0008266857,0.23213403,0.70334065,0.054666612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070519004,0.000033869044,0.018202677,0.00030965975,0.000032437503,0.00017414593,0.0023629179,0.00003444492,0.00021872787,0.0029854532,0.9756115,0.00002718072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5760481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76387805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42395192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072305175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028207585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8528973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790988331","doi":"10.7202/1043159ar","title":"Conditions géographiques de mise en liberté et de probation imposées aux manifestants : une atteinte injustifiée aux droits à la liberté d’expression, de réunion pacifique et d’association","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.016116249900525025,"score_gpt":0.3280149736920107,"score_spread":0.3118987237914857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790988331","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4207481,0.004275647,0.01332046,0.068522185,0.0006135151,0.00010260467,0.0016857496,0.00019356728,0.49053818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795528,0.0010325129,0.0008698652,0.00087923463,0.00012124479,0.00008060931,0.0001439105,0.00003700565,0.017282862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949936,0.0022845445,0.00020935838,0.00059010694,0.00091847376,0.0010039991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949227,0.0019530773,0.0015860253,0.00058234984,0.00067542907,0.00028049017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018775495,0.0004054576,0.00042804214,0.0022276943,0.007390047,0.010963976,0.0010234407,0.002922637,0.015612311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007988289,0.00030311267,0.0003915639,0.0033659022,0.02328584,0.006191984,0.006408793,0.002528966,0.0013931672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005048869,0.000022028538,0.010157616,0.000110354864,0.000014023251,0.0006523676,0.049358647,0.00034353565,0.00043617695,0.92291003,0.0061553707,0.009789328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056539106,0.00010939882,0.09291445,0.00065420754,0.00008871494,0.0016728827,0.3086192,0.000827036,0.0018453693,0.24412131,0.34891355,0.00017741599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05383542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06372648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9461646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055714543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1070441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791254684","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-75497-0_2","title":"Monument, Portrait, Tableau: Making Sense of and with Jacques-Louis David’s Tennis Court Oath","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in the history of law and justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Oath; Portrait; Polity; Constitution; Sovereignty; Law; Art; Art history; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.06906669657142701,"score_gpt":0.3185852872047322,"score_spread":0.24951859063330523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791254684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009748711,0.009715897,0.0039923503,0.0794277,0.0040680883,0.000025153156,0.00009785406,0.000109567096,0.89281476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3099423,0.0027850769,0.002467826,0.014999362,0.0008129847,0.00004552192,0.000051004452,0.0003836561,0.6685122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988696,0.00061647024,0.00001756889,0.00012871971,0.00020602332,0.00016160286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939346,0.0003141842,0.00002492034,0.000042504238,0.000100547906,0.00012441065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012237757,0.0004830334,0.00031438703,0.001044175,0.014136217,0.011926148,0.0010666645,0.0036159237,0.012902174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031736451,0.00030527147,0.00025174112,0.00094316574,0.015166489,0.0063966075,0.0026749477,0.0069798958,0.0017976313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012875071,0.000010352456,0.0001432106,0.000019902713,0.0000026958726,0.000160618,0.044025417,0.00009148056,0.000097585726,0.80719393,0.13728029,0.010961594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021961957,0.0000041074577,0.00010576496,0.0000785932,0.0000019050515,0.00008292187,0.016535094,0.00010650506,0.00008865034,0.03148977,0.95149505,0.000009520244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10393329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2732068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10393329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009585303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042186175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20665663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791823260","doi":"10.7202/1043687ar","title":"Use of Social Norms in the Production of Legal Norms : A Genealogical and Critical Approach to Nudges","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Nudge theory; Deliberation; Legal norm; Publicity; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027180616381863695,"score_gpt":0.28286816299299694,"score_spread":0.25568754661113324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791823260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038636528,0.01692357,0.32021874,0.13957368,0.004820396,0.0005784484,0.00020097975,0.00030340266,0.47874433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8620449,0.005689691,0.083395794,0.007197946,0.0023043577,0.0010239197,0.00011286691,0.000554605,0.0376759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97903115,0.01658011,0.00057304295,0.0010696846,0.0019727512,0.00077331444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9662779,0.02728855,0.0017324141,0.0016243095,0.002487702,0.0005890424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021981172,0.0010044139,0.0010996405,0.0064345067,0.008557149,0.012631714,0.0041504316,0.00625698,0.0028724736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02508134,0.00074206153,0.0008809772,0.0030361805,0.09445739,0.018560778,0.0061044004,0.009447581,0.00056060444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043865475,0.0000045199167,0.000044283886,0.000021649508,0.0000021521744,0.00005709976,0.0127723655,0.00012479682,0.00003873602,0.98417205,0.0011499942,0.0016079133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000911026,0.000028582093,0.0001902231,0.00032615388,0.0000057012235,0.00017734041,0.0123592755,0.0011244661,0.0003061044,0.85616666,0.12927373,0.000032576223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004936629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046689017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021981172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011678856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053354283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116248906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792336989","doi":"","title":"Media law for Canadian journalists","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028431433802218093,"score_gpt":0.2829966193101775,"score_spread":0.2545651855079594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792336989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015039021,0.018117188,0.00038326374,0.16315863,0.004705441,0.0000828023,0.0017913727,0.00036020644,0.8098972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03115969,0.016173044,0.0010102193,0.029772433,0.0020622648,0.00010572482,0.00077914493,0.00024026204,0.91869706],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945937,0.00032018908,0.00015352354,0.0002903089,0.0033137454,0.0013285247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98291147,0.0027572752,0.00037814915,0.00078063953,0.010270355,0.0029021017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031793115,0.0007813001,0.0006388893,0.0062115355,0.02228526,0.021015586,0.0021336684,0.008541419,0.118734784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020224093,0.0009142098,0.0006542781,0.0072371718,0.0060244496,0.0062948004,0.0025351597,0.005411379,0.015799955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054904704,0.000011325781,0.00014668723,0.000054314776,0.0000027160936,0.00003159204,0.00036976143,0.00002746081,0.000060734772,0.04009939,0.94413805,0.015052444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029533721,0.0000023540904,0.00064668286,0.000110390625,0.0000052833093,0.000012744821,0.0005388104,0.00004378516,0.000043057316,0.0027658918,0.9958138,0.000014145759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9688403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98344016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.118734784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08143161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2577028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59083045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793451855","doi":"10.29173/alr1387","title":"Age of the Living Dead: Personality Rights of Deceased Celebrities","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misappropriation; Damages; Tort; Personality; Law; Persona; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Liability; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.030252949525944088,"score_gpt":0.27962254653279706,"score_spread":0.24936959700685296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793451855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21693651,0.021088704,0.0019717144,0.04253539,0.00037816068,0.000030026398,0.00008510964,0.000014622662,0.7169598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9368916,0.0058592167,0.00030287905,0.003898484,0.0001863247,0.000009955458,0.000022936227,0.0000049945406,0.052823603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997644,0.00093693915,0.00008960774,0.00017773513,0.0006897483,0.000461986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630165,0.001311908,0.0006685554,0.00030704465,0.0008463508,0.0005645347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030704003,0.0001287067,0.00024367643,0.00092670356,0.004629285,0.0042128325,0.0008094157,0.002820791,0.0056139324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009563382,0.00016801778,0.00015727662,0.00052508287,0.010428962,0.0033915138,0.0029872737,0.0025802809,0.00058238744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050063154,0.000052938383,0.007780893,0.00011193266,0.000013067452,0.00156852,0.05031719,0.00018497268,0.00080001453,0.8541147,0.0114472825,0.073558375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024989004,0.00013233486,0.044797234,0.00072903564,0.00004087647,0.0026449978,0.07932338,0.0002793344,0.0010790454,0.18969974,0.6811867,0.000062414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06944357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11912317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9305564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003317483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003966469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13807875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793711437","doi":"10.1177/0022018317753033","title":"Did the Individual Consent to the Risk of Harm? A Comparative Jurisdictional Analysis of Consent in Cases of Sexual Transmission/Exposure to HIV","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Criminal Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Informed consent; Harm; Legislature; Bespoke; Extant taxon; Sexual intercourse; Order (exchange); Psychology; Business; Law; Political science; Medicine; Environmental health; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.09767599286971997,"score_gpt":0.37101972147632345,"score_spread":0.2733437286066035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793711437","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4750611,0.0088080475,0.022436688,0.05963804,0.00030556688,0.00029707386,0.00007818535,0.000016703745,0.43335852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953903,0.00086746924,0.0013264471,0.0013868196,0.000038709422,0.000055090317,0.000008439419,0.0000030550398,0.00092361437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9555269,0.036330365,0.00097067823,0.0011597716,0.0033928857,0.002619432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9625344,0.03043163,0.0025003254,0.0018404482,0.0022123915,0.0004807756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028530674,0.00016551542,0.0004397582,0.0018966447,0.0063816714,0.0070081176,0.0016129139,0.0055007716,0.0029766709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062124982,0.00030430153,0.00060518854,0.001381716,0.04490224,0.009853312,0.0055369344,0.0047477228,0.00015500025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001867997,0.000011184422,0.000553743,0.00003061288,0.000005912692,0.00022345093,0.016368067,0.00015748102,0.00006892741,0.97934514,0.00019503478,0.0030217934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058060865,0.00018633527,0.008274388,0.00096035656,0.00011555506,0.0015247626,0.084319666,0.0015672698,0.00066955073,0.8621971,0.040037747,0.000089225934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013703772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013760441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028530674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068651335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009251032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15088642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793712958","doi":"10.16997/book12.e","title":"Law’s Transformative Power: Ideology, Utopia, and Donald Trump","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Westminster Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Utopia; Ideology; Transformative learning; Power (physics); Aesthetics; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Physics","score_opus":0.0201703574135445,"score_gpt":0.22084303483640266,"score_spread":0.20067267742285816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793712958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018392975,0.010630037,0.00348878,0.09360469,0.001132957,0.000011306724,0.000017058648,0.000049069135,0.87267315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89447314,0.003846372,0.0013153125,0.008509981,0.0007354398,0.000057034504,0.000016025915,0.00008579253,0.09096084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979406,0.0010232059,0.00002565505,0.00016752441,0.0005296573,0.0003133627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865353,0.00083771267,0.000092735885,0.00011449005,0.00014043676,0.00016102506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021593599,0.00031750635,0.00026218107,0.0014394316,0.008017271,0.00769906,0.00094982056,0.0027840382,0.0039058565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038569719,0.00018494586,0.00023385335,0.0014124089,0.04468268,0.006660468,0.0035622246,0.0054264413,0.0006528563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027858382,0.0000054705974,0.000045121888,0.000006334165,4.1925185e-7,0.000022498236,0.005704216,0.000029521103,0.000013768697,0.9826847,0.00845087,0.003034342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000975018,0.000010118356,0.00015127298,0.00010620935,0.0000024763747,0.00008783677,0.0073177037,0.0002419637,0.00011240506,0.7010189,0.29093078,0.000010538136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010080094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014242603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011438428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011438428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004558742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08299202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794227085","doi":"10.1111/jols.12081","title":"‘This Land is Yours’: Ownership and Agency in the Sharing City","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Agency (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Common ownership; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.056014358758652516,"score_gpt":0.3247803148904409,"score_spread":0.2687659561317884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794227085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7074027,0.0009552512,0.0043213423,0.019564785,0.000100256555,0.00004249026,0.000055620858,0.000044197208,0.26751336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99411494,0.00010933292,0.00011745224,0.00019059544,0.0000067052174,0.000005884396,0.000005248705,0.000009689911,0.0054402496],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652773,0.0019083833,0.000045255747,0.00023068911,0.00037343756,0.0009144476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812645,0.0005070845,0.00019344623,0.00023484115,0.00024473123,0.0006933975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002563558,0.00023002195,0.00023954612,0.0009373477,0.017691603,0.011794655,0.0011399736,0.00164665,0.0053611724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034121224,0.0002991046,0.00031398234,0.0011698017,0.04880119,0.0068390705,0.009918014,0.0019107579,0.00024885903],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001851123,0.000026073172,0.009431113,0.000018659975,0.000011328169,0.0004572235,0.7381727,0.00021252628,0.00028090255,0.23762964,0.004805516,0.00893583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007941203,0.000028562483,0.010734595,0.00009763306,0.000019262787,0.00032059854,0.7943769,0.00040731727,0.00025421244,0.028282486,0.16542761,0.000042860196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38641816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43210757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38641816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0141167985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009595603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7683379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794693515","doi":"10.21083/csieci.v12i1.3753","title":"When Law Listens","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Bespoke; Active listening; Action (physics); Creativity; Process (computing); Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Computer science; Social psychology; Political science; Communication; Art; Visual arts; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08841927726633443,"score_gpt":0.43512175092425986,"score_spread":0.34670247365792545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794693515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021026963,0.0029471824,0.0113856075,0.13061595,0.0068817562,0.0001080783,0.00012082754,0.00043383468,0.8264798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69916207,0.0024181616,0.0032889727,0.0551835,0.0025164573,0.00024495285,0.00017796333,0.0008468973,0.23616092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98288906,0.008380098,0.00058743614,0.0018781013,0.004018042,0.00224724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98590356,0.0063732127,0.0011621274,0.001637258,0.0030000987,0.0019237325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067916657,0.0005427196,0.0005038547,0.0022404373,0.014743471,0.020269046,0.0018484603,0.008257247,0.028297076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046950698,0.00053567224,0.000493897,0.0010724432,0.038332377,0.022011576,0.009621518,0.012793464,0.010905433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044888635,0.00003859168,0.0010334858,0.00014388726,0.000009554535,0.0012454239,0.22673278,0.00005505958,0.0011327976,0.65578973,0.08278699,0.03098672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015056642,0.0000362359,0.0008287771,0.0005597869,0.0000096968,0.0007368007,0.17423996,0.00010172596,0.000554469,0.16041248,0.6624539,0.00005107289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006657938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006914914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028297076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005387633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056005907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09466314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794766246","doi":"10.21083/csieci.v12i1.3915","title":"The Improvising Judge: An Interview with Her Honour Judge Patricia Smyth, Northern Ireland County Court","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Improvisation; Honour; Realm; Irish; Bespoke; Active listening; Law; Sociology; Creativity; Visual arts; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.058032399781164916,"score_gpt":0.39486640327603195,"score_spread":0.33683400349486703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794766246","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37214524,0.0067863422,0.0022713304,0.4805881,0.005226494,0.00064606627,0.00019028166,0.00020496573,0.13194105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80591786,0.003916116,0.0018558915,0.06966445,0.0008851084,0.0005128529,0.00010530151,0.0002588593,0.116883546],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98883384,0.006228362,0.0002406605,0.00090813497,0.0020158929,0.0017731144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9829096,0.0061208275,0.0008560241,0.00036287206,0.0030763354,0.00667422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065320483,0.0006323378,0.0011147674,0.0012707532,0.032243375,0.008508945,0.0027850566,0.008044077,0.007838822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029536534,0.0011184126,0.00034984827,0.0013788713,0.012260276,0.0044831824,0.0039480478,0.019942516,0.0016989658],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046289246,0.00012116401,0.001424334,0.000089650726,0.000006468971,0.008928602,0.8115213,0.00008812314,0.0010990519,0.0033816833,0.16400759,0.009285773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055048454,0.000053083444,0.0014785357,0.00016272743,0.0000026875082,0.0009248192,0.84936965,0.00009934029,0.000120252305,0.00037741062,0.14736602,0.000039946284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18081278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3467882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18081278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01480882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015366806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35952067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796323116","doi":"10.5663/aps.v7i1.28804","title":"Cultural Genocide in Canada? It Did Happen Here.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"aboriginal policy studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Law; Political science; Convention; Legislation; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.04048836427570041,"score_gpt":0.41319451505857696,"score_spread":0.37270615078287656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796323116","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06652918,0.018784568,0.0022909727,0.5153387,0.0066857506,0.00008012227,0.00061076554,0.00009842142,0.38958156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70363486,0.008973649,0.0019224603,0.1243552,0.00045832977,0.000042409294,0.0002131948,0.00013387603,0.16026606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648607,0.0003646388,0.00007095464,0.00050962495,0.0010441951,0.0015245667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699175,0.0003367458,0.00013873666,0.00015976002,0.001493376,0.0008797174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026000785,0.00032491283,0.00039176925,0.00074816635,0.029996466,0.009604861,0.0014012428,0.005424748,0.008268031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063642547,0.00028113122,0.0005351482,0.0015269781,0.015594149,0.003595669,0.0031856375,0.00878487,0.00054753537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002510095,0.000017189765,0.005275096,0.000096264455,0.000024478528,0.0009915191,0.041512664,0.00018132538,0.00031224563,0.8081966,0.11580408,0.027563455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001308029,0.00001158328,0.006990168,0.00030902817,0.000032841945,0.00032854147,0.036743358,0.00019028036,0.00042267854,0.026671762,0.92818433,0.000102285914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9912656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99427915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09979831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09979831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18734755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7240908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796380786","doi":"10.7202/1043956ar","title":"Biel, Łucja (2014): Lost in the Eurofog: The Textual Fit of Translated Law. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 347 p.","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Meta Journal des traducteurs","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Classics; Law and economics; History; Political science","score_opus":0.06311609894009576,"score_gpt":0.3130761460136857,"score_spread":0.24996004707358996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796380786","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01629982,0.6394042,0.003658969,0.23089194,0.00731184,0.0000272563,0.0015632777,0.0001444823,0.10069825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.618213,0.22278428,0.0048817312,0.035116237,0.0045569404,0.00015222888,0.0013744283,0.0011131765,0.111807995],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915516,0.000437209,0.000056554367,0.000067020876,0.00019947028,0.00008453468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728644,0.0018858371,0.0002960839,0.00007258976,0.00036273463,0.00009636172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002168023,0.0007128164,0.00046962674,0.003476504,0.003028261,0.008558084,0.00085850374,0.0038008797,0.013156884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008733211,0.00042860478,0.00017948107,0.0045880694,0.0048423135,0.01617227,0.0019958671,0.0028555563,0.0027730349],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015917693,0.000024227698,0.0016577279,0.0009560038,0.000022161736,0.0005133234,0.067998216,0.000118361895,0.00045605673,0.1634414,0.6032182,0.16143522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016001035,0.000013084596,0.010377287,0.0049879164,0.000020972191,0.00051427615,0.037057824,0.00015254196,0.0006930896,0.034091838,0.91204077,0.00003447069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024007214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043722462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024007214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036604237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021935166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047734916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797343968","doi":"10.29173/alr1439","title":"Correcting Miscarriages of Justice: The Role of the Criminal Cases Review Commission - The Bowker Lecture, September 28, 1999","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Jurisdiction; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminal justice; Royal Commission; Strengths and weaknesses; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.021539661980322165,"score_gpt":0.31943581829019935,"score_spread":0.2978961563098772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797343968","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001430194,0.27380303,0.00061327807,0.6297763,0.020275231,0.000036293703,0.000053178024,0.00007302975,0.07393942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13837545,0.3702744,0.0036802192,0.14289573,0.028672425,0.00010648975,0.00018021728,0.00020657839,0.3156085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887677,0.0036430478,0.0006286514,0.0010289967,0.00440563,0.0015260294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97691196,0.010867616,0.0013999969,0.0006342559,0.0071628382,0.0030233331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019607896,0.00044350268,0.00050669874,0.00285299,0.005581868,0.012786492,0.0013830457,0.011091678,0.0071614864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046145704,0.0008625761,0.00021654902,0.0019503662,0.0061219046,0.007013197,0.0026342259,0.007811053,0.0028760622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020248237,0.000017276574,0.00040955943,0.000123776,0.000009746103,0.00013067118,0.0006570789,0.00011381659,0.00009753528,0.04546808,0.88738245,0.06556968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013984366,0.000019263856,0.0018534556,0.0005919671,0.000014054572,0.00016526626,0.0010442837,0.00010111536,0.00014276232,0.008226984,0.98779637,0.000030570685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17623653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38495812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9735009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026499072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039647553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35042143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797780163","doi":"10.29173/alr1401","title":"Law Reviews as Cultural Narrative","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Sociology; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04223255847588125,"score_gpt":0.36554051925335174,"score_spread":0.3233079607774705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797780163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013071324,0.20321237,0.0014772858,0.32527578,0.010522592,0.000064269334,0.00029621407,0.00014940773,0.4576949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17165136,0.21531454,0.002688621,0.22368194,0.025799943,0.000581373,0.00040404673,0.00033505022,0.3595432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9759159,0.011783888,0.0010974848,0.0014691616,0.008146604,0.001586905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9396821,0.03714787,0.003793381,0.003409922,0.012626801,0.0033399095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022505876,0.00084315037,0.0012537666,0.013761471,0.008212544,0.030001711,0.0028535502,0.021268783,0.01902172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06700191,0.0012492273,0.0005430497,0.012686552,0.025563085,0.011700341,0.0044028624,0.008814003,0.002996328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000603478,0.0000083048135,0.00008851754,0.00018467527,0.000011422463,0.000027908693,0.00070125156,0.00011278492,0.0000304919,0.6310061,0.35448864,0.0133338785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007964159,0.000005805575,0.00027348613,0.0006372156,0.000015055315,0.000019513072,0.0006952699,0.00008286561,0.00003360331,0.07404678,0.9241676,0.00001489772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20937292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36634472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20937292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03302497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048887834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41630852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798065477","doi":"10.29173/alr1389","title":"Law as Politics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03312496133540204,"score_gpt":0.31548511010496016,"score_spread":0.2823601487695581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798065477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012497443,0.21676208,0.001095407,0.18765064,0.010429679,0.00006373626,0.000385861,0.00016096796,0.5822018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07267331,0.08575972,0.0012633293,0.1367954,0.009305936,0.00016259034,0.00041691042,0.00017451435,0.69344836],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733585,0.00055924954,0.00008150496,0.0003629225,0.0012767485,0.00038361034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972549,0.00087155565,0.0001260528,0.00028625978,0.0010589982,0.00040226945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027931915,0.0008586821,0.00075368385,0.0039062873,0.0076671843,0.013755389,0.001666741,0.011305714,0.030273385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070162127,0.00069125486,0.00042583628,0.004526244,0.012939223,0.005720033,0.0023756078,0.008300614,0.005398532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007947474,0.000014978968,0.00014030185,0.00012486883,0.0000081057005,0.000022895942,0.00031924073,0.00011432413,0.000048637496,0.3465149,0.62882334,0.023860425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006150947,0.000004244066,0.0005859233,0.0002604967,0.000011045486,0.000017817036,0.0003101468,0.000052910946,0.000034294993,0.058675867,0.9400339,0.0000071834947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5135234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6691222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5135234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026014594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040474076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9786831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800150798","doi":"10.22215/etd/2015-11120","title":"Unsettling Miss Chief and Buffalo Boy: Interrupting Canada's Politics of Reconciliation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sovereignty; Queer; Politics; Conceptualization; State (computer science); Colonialism; Sociology; Mythology; Law; Gender studies; Political science; Media studies; Aesthetics; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.022461039695323454,"score_gpt":0.3142678656180807,"score_spread":0.2918068259227572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800150798","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25383553,0.005251745,0.0027048625,0.06268425,0.00057184935,0.00003685885,0.00011205741,0.00010377384,0.67469907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92827564,0.0012286346,0.00067030074,0.0026937616,0.000045699446,0.000011443552,0.00001926351,0.00005334299,0.06700199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997773,0.00053275604,0.000018273391,0.00017903512,0.00058697554,0.0009098494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882203,0.00037769126,0.000055653065,0.00007701944,0.00032386958,0.00034373408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016722478,0.0002541816,0.00025207567,0.0009125703,0.048020713,0.010396789,0.0011675722,0.0019058263,0.009738987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002869971,0.00019601251,0.00019410801,0.0012746109,0.02625418,0.0026189587,0.0038421203,0.004062477,0.00035746067],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006646397,0.000017945124,0.002768223,0.00007804461,0.0000114465975,0.000782796,0.3832162,0.00047920685,0.0006120866,0.49817687,0.06870334,0.04508741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008827344,0.000015257783,0.0040490627,0.00021854378,0.000016119888,0.00018970217,0.2797865,0.00042235677,0.00058703107,0.0150119355,0.69964474,0.00004994768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9620898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99091154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052489035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052489035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055901945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38083637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800795688","doi":"","title":"Valorizing Disobedience within the Ranks: Law and Resistance in American Military Films","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Jurisprudence; Resistance (ecology); Civil disobedience; Law; Political science; Popular culture; Legal culture; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.0066775355761285685,"score_gpt":0.2598637509458087,"score_spread":0.25318621536968017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800795688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78921,0.0026735226,0.0007498008,0.013788949,0.00039448077,0.000026926367,0.000023950792,0.00003112496,0.19310118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98876524,0.001165266,0.00018193129,0.0010304608,0.00015316746,0.0000097363745,0.000012792319,0.000026761187,0.008654734],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978671,0.001504583,0.000036765705,0.00011207748,0.00024544256,0.00023405267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708277,0.001973609,0.00036193564,0.000100506,0.00023558723,0.0002455352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001922287,0.00038428034,0.00022860736,0.0015886591,0.0117943045,0.0073988764,0.00062149443,0.0017406009,0.0033599604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054757292,0.00033619124,0.00016684103,0.001083212,0.0099603385,0.0039313887,0.002800216,0.0040409607,0.0002838923],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032972857,0.00006530762,0.0024982297,0.00007648979,0.000008064333,0.00059042766,0.9476702,0.000023944769,0.0016327669,0.028788254,0.0056002294,0.013013159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074394065,0.000072742325,0.012700567,0.00024396196,0.000016736209,0.00076711253,0.83844024,0.00014630005,0.0009893462,0.0028990463,0.14368945,0.000027152028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007648852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01941592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0117943045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023337156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083624286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016932368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803372802","doi":"10.3138/jcs.2017-0025.r1","title":"The Elsewhere War: Art, Embodiment, and the Spaces of Military Engagement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Embodied cognition; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Sociology; Meaning (existential); Media studies; History; Visual arts; Art; Epistemology; Literature; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03178828581239381,"score_gpt":0.3056767680345085,"score_spread":0.2738884822221147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803372802","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39355496,0.0067538545,0.010031971,0.013495826,0.00022239456,0.00004502717,0.000054424825,0.0000932234,0.57574826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861022,0.0009823667,0.0009809345,0.00036497175,0.00001694744,0.000011418465,0.000011064897,0.000025324518,0.011504698],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975624,0.0009878189,0.000036135098,0.00018841628,0.0004817944,0.0007435191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989497,0.00045652423,0.00010747439,0.00011739169,0.0001358303,0.00023304393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001816887,0.0007015764,0.0003436943,0.0017977221,0.02148661,0.012512544,0.0013057654,0.0018118436,0.005981141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024371766,0.00026289822,0.0003909779,0.0015499104,0.061384067,0.004524493,0.00873798,0.0023747198,0.00028815115],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024311126,0.000014526199,0.0014675336,0.00007183132,0.000011741023,0.00077261525,0.73215187,0.00027009583,0.00096350274,0.24439262,0.0024017736,0.01745766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009350941,0.00003268097,0.004808708,0.0003626627,0.000028499036,0.0005994215,0.7493789,0.00026966445,0.00071628497,0.032948844,0.2107884,0.000056602286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6453129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7536404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3546871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0210999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02043719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7135518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804220717","doi":"10.7202/1044316ar","title":"John Forester : observateur d’épisodes dramatiques de la planification urbaine. Commentaires sur le livre Dealing With Differences: Dramas of Mediating Public Disputes, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les ateliers de l éthique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Forester; Humanities; Art; Geography; Forestry","score_opus":0.023439944663787533,"score_gpt":0.23835952965787136,"score_spread":0.2149195849940838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804220717","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015563546,0.1961823,0.0039936104,0.5137012,0.014333661,0.000110673034,0.000400431,0.00019372776,0.25552085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41459814,0.060292337,0.0031847546,0.07209446,0.0049953987,0.00027660813,0.00026804605,0.00065788504,0.4436323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670154,0.0018247948,0.00007696286,0.00025495555,0.0007472715,0.00039445795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753416,0.0014851021,0.0002543287,0.00011759484,0.0003300883,0.0002786361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029582502,0.0008084645,0.0004806636,0.0010365384,0.012332383,0.0061258986,0.001436607,0.005747292,0.0151726445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070657455,0.00042533886,0.00037004935,0.0020999238,0.009643216,0.010714167,0.0038834491,0.007991155,0.0019999947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009799308,0.00003773782,0.00047717406,0.0002517967,0.000008684972,0.0006613464,0.1290948,0.000084102736,0.0004469006,0.1153253,0.72965425,0.023859935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006133775,0.000006780191,0.00078033796,0.00021876303,0.0000016985479,0.00014381803,0.024382863,0.00002997069,0.00020480117,0.0047252993,0.96948403,0.00001552454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091382824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15576327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091382824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059833126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041134106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18170184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804240424","doi":"10.1086/697335","title":"<i>Martial Law and English Laws, c. 1500–1700</i>. By John M. Collins. Cambridge Studies in Early Modern British History. Edited by John Morrill et al.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. Pp. xiv+320. $99.00.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Modern History","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Classics; History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.019699585287246635,"score_gpt":0.23937678571521942,"score_spread":0.21967720042797279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804240424","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023292059,0.83668506,0.00019359212,0.03800771,0.010995504,0.000020769292,0.0019140487,0.00006429393,0.109789826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11578348,0.45234135,0.0008517721,0.0146304,0.017035943,0.00014487238,0.0033204658,0.00028374323,0.39560792],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995801,0.000060810104,0.000040379935,0.0000595555,0.0001811841,0.00007795657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993623,0.000166035,0.00019881986,0.00002787417,0.00016201135,0.00008292448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053886854,0.0009218828,0.00034735078,0.002838652,0.0015867673,0.0025698387,0.00080668833,0.0013913229,0.024353178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023125494,0.00032193307,0.00023278956,0.0055692545,0.0021168727,0.003680376,0.0010849109,0.0018469347,0.0047911955],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004394579,0.000011747628,0.0008255591,0.00043703738,0.000008249888,0.00007448197,0.0024240604,0.000042184856,0.00012566766,0.035949517,0.9000648,0.05999267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027513777,0.0000057282205,0.008177795,0.00058218796,0.0000023738048,0.000055273442,0.0005887487,0.000013794252,0.000054837703,0.0020704803,0.98843914,0.0000067830088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15725091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27037472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15725091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004307845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033345658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31267124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805828805","doi":"","title":"L’imaginaire de la forensique / The Imaginary of Forensics / Paul Vanouse, Suspect Inversion Center","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Ciel variable : art, photo, médias, culture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Imaginary; Suspect; Art; Philosophy; Criminology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.011466637449014216,"score_gpt":0.24814654865387503,"score_spread":0.23667991120486082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805828805","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017672506,0.08046402,0.0010858375,0.87441057,0.006391082,0.000011362378,0.000023253664,0.000021497593,0.035825096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34096262,0.13288581,0.003217143,0.2863639,0.035495274,0.00012627953,0.00005144214,0.00036973704,0.20052782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99542254,0.0027611977,0.0001237942,0.0004142885,0.0009759899,0.00030216857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913571,0.006366419,0.00035883154,0.00019544903,0.0010679794,0.0006543174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006727407,0.0007723578,0.00055084284,0.001718563,0.012960305,0.011425118,0.0014264258,0.012852545,0.0048163394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014200507,0.00064897543,0.00028661813,0.0009417708,0.024789985,0.011510585,0.003935273,0.017767895,0.0009620572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020910456,0.00002720507,0.00015844902,0.00010416861,0.0000049297428,0.0001863773,0.010995507,0.00012781897,0.00011535826,0.49672928,0.47459456,0.016935416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015177905,0.000009024485,0.00022195003,0.00034823414,0.0000036755691,0.00043706427,0.015201026,0.00026492294,0.00021161862,0.10465031,0.87861305,0.00002397234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029192632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041624293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029192632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008182436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00850188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059368014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806696261","doi":"","title":"Crime, Desire, and Law’s Unconscious","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscious mind; Criminology; Law; Criminal law; Psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Political science","score_opus":0.0242219383720421,"score_gpt":0.2830232979503656,"score_spread":0.2588013595783235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806696261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22946061,0.002236993,0.010356646,0.06316258,0.00026114902,0.00002969056,0.000153585,0.00006621269,0.6942725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99453354,0.00016253119,0.00024342949,0.00082293426,0.000041684136,0.00000814807,0.000010721924,0.000012368334,0.004164526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978179,0.0012419173,0.000064830856,0.00020641081,0.00038651237,0.0002824812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99539244,0.0029970296,0.00036924437,0.0005151737,0.000426081,0.00029993927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003562372,0.0001702465,0.00028241452,0.0012242852,0.0037400296,0.0075798696,0.00083409145,0.003530061,0.004516948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010889228,0.0002686265,0.0002891719,0.00094790437,0.03198618,0.005812537,0.0022255955,0.0041220263,0.00026227333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014061085,0.000017366052,0.0006037723,0.000009203061,0.0000042034744,0.000038330585,0.014725811,0.00006941765,0.00010735255,0.98087114,0.0012646526,0.0022745985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017264998,0.000014904891,0.0020217185,0.00005124185,0.00000771629,0.000107959975,0.018079747,0.00054393033,0.00021753758,0.9528154,0.026098449,0.000024245828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008283799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006929792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008283799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027753687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003552808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020136833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806759261","doi":"10.5007/2175-795x.2017v35n4p1125","title":"A questão do mau gosto, entre o juízo estético e os prazeres \"culpáveis\"","year":2017,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Perspectiva","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Chemistry","score_opus":0.0288544710188928,"score_gpt":0.34042906961210156,"score_spread":0.31157459859320874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806759261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18827951,0.005366376,0.059859715,0.028143343,0.0010740979,0.00012838894,0.0003806655,0.00038861463,0.7163793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87455404,0.0021669425,0.019473013,0.0028481262,0.00020636558,0.00014762509,0.00022510976,0.00027818084,0.10010067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977703,0.00096133084,0.00008496407,0.0004409202,0.00054737536,0.00019510384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99726886,0.00093312043,0.00037345968,0.00037965568,0.0006975086,0.00034740593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022665348,0.0005811404,0.00036332224,0.0008022422,0.0037480493,0.007115858,0.0009092795,0.0019385435,0.012931759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005310812,0.0003659987,0.00043045328,0.0006677595,0.011219776,0.006392623,0.0043013785,0.0030041803,0.0018763855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011306852,0.000067502326,0.005661263,0.00048362752,0.000044354005,0.00043232462,0.087537274,0.00020771351,0.0134473,0.84857273,0.00820842,0.03522445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035507543,0.00024444063,0.016863007,0.00068010675,0.0001196969,0.0010679758,0.07167128,0.00074876804,0.008240602,0.24150592,0.6586996,0.0001232064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041521033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011307675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012931759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026063567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028380111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04326105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806796431","doi":"10.32396/usurj.v4i2.306","title":"Covering in Canada: Potential to Animate Human Rights","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"USURJ University of Saskatchewan Undergraduate Research Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"BC Children's Hospital","keywords":"Legislation; Statutory law; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Law; Expression (computer science); Political science; Identity (music); Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029345581238901543,"score_gpt":0.3015415985192115,"score_spread":0.27219601728030995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806796431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06841906,0.0023973228,0.0048079384,0.060221624,0.0004146615,0.00007577543,0.00014855973,0.000095122305,0.86342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90873086,0.0018339287,0.0024859053,0.010846825,0.00008800398,0.000040992993,0.00006820932,0.000061895866,0.07584348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99407864,0.0008596016,0.000064781976,0.0005500199,0.0018781128,0.002568823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968394,0.0007962535,0.00019622369,0.00029777808,0.000993462,0.0008769596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028959808,0.00045737388,0.000400838,0.0013400516,0.028901579,0.010118121,0.0021179235,0.004097286,0.011004387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006456435,0.0003801544,0.00052864186,0.0019482864,0.026182998,0.0029783894,0.008343587,0.004475611,0.000514866],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016464215,0.000014024009,0.002967933,0.00003901484,0.000010594451,0.00042348498,0.019429926,0.000436554,0.00029963013,0.9354679,0.022032196,0.018862236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024813451,0.000031635293,0.009063209,0.00033180704,0.000058904545,0.0003118824,0.03626356,0.0014431057,0.00086446584,0.16225617,0.789226,0.00012446141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98085827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99055934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09207845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09207845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15065685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.668079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808225335","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2017-0074","title":"The architectural metaphor and the decline of political conventions in the Supreme Court of Canada’s <i>Senate Reform Reference</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Constitution; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Nomination; Separation of powers; Constitutional law; Political question; Campaign finance; Federalism; Sociology","score_opus":0.014169028608343584,"score_gpt":0.24523895859791522,"score_spread":0.23106992998957165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808225335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13421574,0.0036174501,0.0057329326,0.076524876,0.00049294205,0.000040085368,0.00018932666,0.00012716114,0.7790594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957481,0.00051981903,0.0009279387,0.004939502,0.000047056707,0.000017475644,0.00003501696,0.00005108922,0.03598112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467695,0.0013757331,0.000080244834,0.00043680798,0.0017203207,0.0017100027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801373,0.00053251104,0.00013027505,0.00018349767,0.0007727574,0.0003672805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026173687,0.00032969037,0.0003312423,0.0015282072,0.039631877,0.015160416,0.0017889343,0.0038401226,0.0043381844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004919587,0.00037840605,0.00031047047,0.0024633843,0.0513486,0.0029519715,0.003376014,0.0064939307,0.00035900075],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005100208,0.0000023570608,0.0003031723,0.0000068657573,0.0000016437936,0.000087398774,0.014777929,0.0001447612,0.00010903717,0.97688216,0.0055478173,0.0021317387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036465375,0.000019217881,0.0064397906,0.00020207994,0.000029222028,0.00018267287,0.045610636,0.0011298138,0.00077038235,0.17839967,0.7670406,0.00013929661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9750217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9849385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109248936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.109248936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08996024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79266024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809882678","doi":"10.3138/ctr.175.009","title":"“I Wonder Where They Went”: Post-Reality Multiplicities and Counter-Resurgent Narratives in Thirza Cuthand’s <i>Lessons in Baby Dyke Theory</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Indigenous; Wonder; Narrative; Media studies; Performance art; Hegemony; Sociology; Art; Art history; History; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Visual arts; Politics; Political science; Literature; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.02807028392111829,"score_gpt":0.31917261262263524,"score_spread":0.291102328701517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809882678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61259544,0.0061691324,0.0070728143,0.04370676,0.0007765351,0.00009409036,0.00011396646,0.00011528413,0.32935596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978905,0.00077721744,0.0007327415,0.0011728421,0.000033091343,0.00004990572,0.000022165115,0.00007999973,0.018227035],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962788,0.0024554667,0.00005795214,0.00026525205,0.00036014596,0.0005823394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965321,0.0025143225,0.000250514,0.00017538032,0.00023552225,0.0002920229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042938595,0.0006435712,0.00046247218,0.001400505,0.022481846,0.009226568,0.0015370643,0.0030835762,0.005243891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077659134,0.0005004959,0.00029462323,0.0011314572,0.04657714,0.008820426,0.0068114693,0.006623843,0.00044792195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013308491,0.0000048633083,0.00017850414,0.000023485027,0.0000016824929,0.0005715288,0.9064114,0.000017346705,0.00013599009,0.088385776,0.0020635196,0.0021926777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062245817,0.00001108391,0.0005705816,0.00016691789,0.000006583855,0.00053940085,0.8925088,0.00006301046,0.00027909692,0.010047016,0.095781475,0.000019823681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11214351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19627066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11214351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012149424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007075531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22298151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810310481","doi":"10.1177/0308518x18786964","title":"Feminist legal geographies of intimate-image sexual abuse: Using copyright logic to combat the unauthorized distribution of celebrity intimate images in cyberspaces","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning A Economy and Space","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Harvard University; University of Miami","keywords":"Creativity; The Internet; Space (punctuation); Internet privacy; Sociology; Cyber Space; Law; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.013745654622373555,"score_gpt":0.2659392882484679,"score_spread":0.25219363362609437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810310481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15089023,0.010973234,0.030974237,0.14043328,0.00097094825,0.00010172545,0.000111305286,0.00008175226,0.66546327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768515,0.0018902988,0.002130889,0.0033765181,0.0002632174,0.00006300665,0.000021195514,0.000056612538,0.0153468065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942259,0.0041482314,0.00013901373,0.00044185173,0.0006761695,0.00036887266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891661,0.008575066,0.0008450063,0.0006007172,0.00055571774,0.00025738374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008003604,0.00051522226,0.0003200962,0.0026681519,0.0099098,0.008929806,0.0013607045,0.004049414,0.0057057776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012207972,0.00032356387,0.00029734918,0.0011065924,0.07129017,0.014389996,0.0064822724,0.005338337,0.00040599794],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004361119,0.0000056597582,0.00022453936,0.000028621831,0.0000011689701,0.00018386992,0.06389045,0.000072571864,0.00010324354,0.93118757,0.0012548086,0.0030432078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013296023,0.000024375684,0.0010262238,0.0008834112,0.000011972579,0.0007136232,0.16479792,0.00086002506,0.0013363399,0.44299424,0.38730845,0.000030032512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008119745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072597596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009994341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009994341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040391576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072514355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W285823492","doi":"","title":"Sophie McCall. First Person Plural: Aboriginal Storytelling and the Ethics of Collaborative Authorship","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian ethnic studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Storytelling; Sociology; Appropriation; Narrative; Sovereignty; Plural; Media studies; Economic Justice; Anthropology; History; Gender studies; Law; Literature; Political science; Politics; Linguistics; Art","score_opus":0.14046597362123361,"score_gpt":0.4042930873225276,"score_spread":0.26382711370129397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W285823492","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021856276,0.525073,0.0024872234,0.22842658,0.0061168037,0.000079004676,0.00014788732,0.00015236177,0.23533158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11758153,0.36558104,0.0047108764,0.034256823,0.005231984,0.0003788365,0.00018775732,0.00034780885,0.47172338],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980558,0.0009212297,0.00007800891,0.00017596487,0.00059399474,0.00017499825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664646,0.002046673,0.00020579426,0.000100791556,0.0005787274,0.00042154302],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018485448,0.0010018761,0.00048365264,0.0016946266,0.009150537,0.0054597566,0.0013483039,0.0037531059,0.017867077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050873663,0.0005921131,0.00031694415,0.002468504,0.0077569643,0.009179132,0.0029730347,0.004443888,0.0046650604],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026940286,0.000021135673,0.00022353748,0.0005715668,0.0000075267185,0.0004964179,0.05250492,0.00008041412,0.00015684777,0.06836151,0.8239634,0.053585786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054661746,0.000010977151,0.0006704241,0.0007542896,0.0000048712204,0.00031062713,0.014285183,0.00006156124,0.00010026941,0.020195605,0.963584,0.000016633481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20387943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33826756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99084944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007977565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058179763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40538543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W285972008","doi":"10.1111/j.0023-9216.2005.00087.x","title":"Authorizing the Production of Urban Moral Order: Appellate Courts and Their Knowledge Games","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Order (exchange); Action (physics); Law; Sociology; Production (economics); Work (physics); Political science; Epistemology; Law and economics; Business; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.028509956957411594,"score_gpt":0.30191605205779215,"score_spread":0.27340609510038055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W285972008","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6502806,0.0003307132,0.081211045,0.011621417,0.000052774787,0.0002962075,0.000088844325,0.00008937205,0.25602907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924353,0.00006990048,0.0038663582,0.00009214184,0.000009049397,0.00006417414,0.000012256918,0.000010029396,0.0034408818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99286824,0.0050952956,0.00020160039,0.0005327105,0.00063651544,0.00066564087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97607565,0.019361245,0.0015412961,0.0011861381,0.00068885065,0.0011469008],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071698586,0.00027963825,0.00045383614,0.0012647429,0.0029831536,0.0063287686,0.0015507679,0.0034415626,0.005737132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02667326,0.0003729229,0.0005582623,0.000905714,0.008388481,0.007872039,0.0039515034,0.0020626727,0.00038037734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007659898,0.00008555051,0.0020653491,0.000047274145,0.0000291881,0.00026663105,0.010534,0.013386642,0.0005079184,0.961489,0.00095985667,0.010552042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110027955,0.00007918345,0.002227534,0.000050054194,0.000032368003,0.00009212927,0.0118739735,0.103878364,0.00083834317,0.86536896,0.015406644,0.000042282954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009318527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073890714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99701685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037810167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027437168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03791827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2861925104","doi":"10.1007/978-981-13-1023-2_12","title":"Mansfield, Atkin, Weinstein: Three Responsive Judges at the Nexus of Law, Politics, and Economy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius gentium","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Politics; Economic Justice; Law; Openness to experience; Political science; Theme (computing); Sociology; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.026440696476947207,"score_gpt":0.2666805165491613,"score_spread":0.2402398200722141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2861925104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010810211,0.042469356,0.009255202,0.21412086,0.0035454582,0.0000762045,0.00011618713,0.00009621538,0.7195103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3035589,0.009160416,0.003772727,0.031569347,0.00083241693,0.00014407744,0.000052249557,0.00021227833,0.65069747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987747,0.0005670451,0.000024420064,0.00014471907,0.00028449533,0.0002046774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895287,0.00066306593,0.00004897733,0.000043076543,0.0001524177,0.00013958065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020924648,0.00065776554,0.0004042448,0.0007932497,0.008500871,0.007166075,0.0013829436,0.006707827,0.011800564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038623048,0.00039509468,0.00025231877,0.0011937034,0.009944504,0.0071648373,0.002761709,0.007760456,0.0019307431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009339886,0.00001492743,0.00008884242,0.000023845003,0.0000020856924,0.000043517986,0.0055845017,0.00007407024,0.000094701136,0.902972,0.08348724,0.0076049315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018238386,0.000010280717,0.00043070907,0.0001998301,0.000009014202,0.00007646202,0.0050266706,0.00028934205,0.00046117825,0.611449,0.38200712,0.000022239603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026873577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07389554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026873577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007088527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009064275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053434312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883061291","doi":"","title":"Copyright As a Property Right? Authorial Perspectives in Eighteenth-Century England","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UC Irvine law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Statute; Law; Property (philosophy); Intellectual property; Proposition; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Copyright Act; Sociology; Easement; History; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02152914237324407,"score_gpt":0.32519881301413256,"score_spread":0.3036696706408885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883061291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.232475,0.07937828,0.0011502557,0.12686536,0.0020626802,0.000028934373,0.0001030532,0.000029106572,0.5579072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91129667,0.017664772,0.00029522908,0.005454303,0.0011985993,0.000027578631,0.00001898051,0.000033535915,0.06401042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957461,0.0023165743,0.0002919738,0.00035917156,0.00070275314,0.0005834095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98952484,0.007591451,0.00077366875,0.00028148852,0.0010857821,0.0007426706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048237597,0.00031454262,0.00045848833,0.002686172,0.014584442,0.017944995,0.0012386716,0.005255248,0.004574472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008885957,0.00035914415,0.00020587957,0.0022024217,0.02749339,0.012515361,0.0037380827,0.0060880273,0.00063921366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001960345,0.000026873613,0.00061084196,0.000075842334,0.0000025103689,0.00085537886,0.29792073,0.00003311556,0.00011323584,0.69179434,0.0040932354,0.004454304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000170836,0.00003354767,0.0016970721,0.0006857801,0.0000056682634,0.0005019692,0.09911281,0.00007949936,0.00025041733,0.061576836,0.8360053,0.000034097167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02773463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036431782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02773463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014565211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00507113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1056785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883590287","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5111","title":"The Natural Right To Parody: Assessing The (Potential) Parody/Satire Dichotomies In American And Canadian Copyright Laws","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Intellectual property; Copyright law; Normative; Statute; Natural (archaeology); Jurisdiction; Balance (ability); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.013756937038472814,"score_gpt":0.32661153164367096,"score_spread":0.31285459460519816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883590287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5040201,0.0022734543,0.003207577,0.01389364,0.0001036184,0.00018264147,0.00026652223,0.000023773095,0.47602856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948409,0.0005052266,0.0008679117,0.0006262286,0.000018679351,0.00004412962,0.00006778442,0.0000145179865,0.0030145291],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97369087,0.0048795072,0.0008155027,0.0017084379,0.014382629,0.0045230477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.965366,0.013643949,0.0040072934,0.0017554692,0.012525551,0.0027016075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016194224,0.00033111064,0.0006179431,0.010030408,0.020640286,0.012932629,0.0029469964,0.0030168004,0.0056651304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06522476,0.0003795365,0.0006326742,0.007854194,0.05171526,0.0086406395,0.008574964,0.0051395083,0.00027043765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008142691,0.0000435984,0.026523063,0.00009951633,0.000016179187,0.000120926525,0.075329386,0.00023478037,0.0002742469,0.8737567,0.002291774,0.02122841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007596719,0.00012273416,0.2881032,0.0015227628,0.0002118865,0.00043544127,0.32923317,0.003911066,0.00076505676,0.2297029,0.14555953,0.0003563384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9169304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95223373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08306962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07420702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06654067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53841215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885131719","doi":"10.31274/sciencecommunication-180809-70","title":"Authority in an Age of Expertise","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Iowa State University Summer Symposium on Science Communication","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05390228420445866,"score_gpt":0.3290651274110487,"score_spread":0.27516284320659007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885131719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03954845,0.005107028,0.008468376,0.115363024,0.0012382226,0.000026483518,0.00006998904,0.00006761236,0.8301108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91784304,0.0022812865,0.001794375,0.00864033,0.0015669522,0.00004383448,0.000031995485,0.0000993114,0.06769889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99244374,0.0037177845,0.00019127422,0.0009812649,0.0014121303,0.0012537367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876601,0.005765498,0.0011003101,0.0012986,0.0019692583,0.0022062105],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009279965,0.0004136598,0.0004888223,0.0020748137,0.017442338,0.013106614,0.00096226484,0.0069068754,0.015212619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02117623,0.0004233626,0.0004213429,0.00088390324,0.035005942,0.025057243,0.010521632,0.008290971,0.0031102381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017660814,0.000008626835,0.00025363063,0.000016320317,0.0000023527525,0.00018665541,0.03055066,0.00006101322,0.0001021445,0.95466197,0.009341947,0.004797014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001878249,0.000024572326,0.00042781234,0.000114659626,0.000004589207,0.0003432293,0.011184324,0.00032309172,0.00014093399,0.5954384,0.39195403,0.000025624311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004954322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045566717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98255765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005120964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004133899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05089128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W288649189","doi":"","title":"'Talk to Her' or Breaking the Silence of Neglected Bonds","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Epistemology; State (computer science); Bioethics; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Art; Philosophy; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.021504790159907906,"score_gpt":0.2797086911258395,"score_spread":0.2582039009659316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W288649189","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038101424,0.016291546,0.017309241,0.45397878,0.026448317,0.00011147693,0.00017254644,0.00054620736,0.44704044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65560657,0.005352742,0.003043103,0.12543057,0.0054147146,0.00020704242,0.000113985625,0.0008501442,0.20398113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99316895,0.0044394513,0.000105725485,0.0005792831,0.00093544985,0.0007711712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929763,0.003606551,0.00088387856,0.00061161973,0.0007507034,0.0011709824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005137946,0.0008145731,0.00067399524,0.0005594157,0.012405755,0.007987765,0.001769416,0.006216053,0.010964489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025452761,0.00035938615,0.00043848675,0.00043123978,0.021944135,0.012055261,0.0072156535,0.011888878,0.005251881],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015682544,0.00004329152,0.0004905656,0.00026570496,0.000030459445,0.0009408706,0.33166644,0.00008318517,0.0015477453,0.36922854,0.27269256,0.02285385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001286793,0.000041739997,0.00031560307,0.00030356055,0.000010555708,0.0005818879,0.07952446,0.00015406692,0.0006473019,0.023041334,0.89533436,0.00003231159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029260127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029752434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012405755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028848848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018244531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036679864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886774758","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198785521.013.46","title":"Colonial Criminal Law and Other Modernities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Framing (construction); Law; Subject matter; Colonialism; Narrative; Subject (documents); Political science; Sociology; History; Literature; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.03423852364799256,"score_gpt":0.24637728495611486,"score_spread":0.2121387613081223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886774758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030454507,0.045484927,0.0005577013,0.017632255,0.00058222504,0.000011941835,0.000019132234,0.000016605942,0.90524083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83188075,0.036840063,0.0006515261,0.00597117,0.0013742639,0.000043787804,0.000029414456,0.000048414953,0.12316055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986721,0.00055605406,0.000041451294,0.00016580598,0.00027885073,0.000285819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998914,0.00050765905,0.00014177633,0.00013543804,0.00013902114,0.00016208715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010676571,0.0003267048,0.00029070966,0.0015187191,0.0076981382,0.0052652536,0.00047981262,0.0011705729,0.004958385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032052503,0.00017988113,0.00015764311,0.0020261642,0.025789104,0.0038186002,0.00307238,0.00297403,0.00034461476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029766359,0.0000066160464,0.0001989214,0.000027859856,0.0000019569197,0.00009380373,0.013665093,0.000046628677,0.000031966283,0.9722721,0.0051385015,0.008513672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060782813,0.000013879688,0.0019149496,0.00033819216,0.0000037850484,0.0002709395,0.008318967,0.00010917585,0.000054191616,0.15911418,0.829845,0.000010613031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025521014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04461174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025521014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009954128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038698008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07222259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887526084","doi":"10.1017/jli.2018.28","title":"Information Sovereignty: Data Privacy, Sovereign Powers and the Rule of Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Legal Information","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Chinese University of Hong Kong; McGill University; World Bank Group; Eli Lilly and Company","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.020070052380171306,"score_gpt":0.3098086484864854,"score_spread":0.28973859610631414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887526084","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004088917,0.662034,0.0155034475,0.13014324,0.003324144,0.000034174656,0.00023012368,0.00012315056,0.18451878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2886409,0.5805522,0.013844507,0.019160992,0.013410426,0.0002357831,0.00084072375,0.00022479234,0.08308969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99556535,0.002217148,0.00021520107,0.00043226042,0.0012513059,0.00031878566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99431545,0.004186691,0.00049912394,0.00039734883,0.00036926207,0.00023214804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044925753,0.0008253405,0.0010973347,0.0021951683,0.002397358,0.016185945,0.0013163271,0.0052194004,0.010801831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008758452,0.0006403389,0.0005287134,0.006741071,0.018588943,0.027030174,0.005722393,0.0064329286,0.002143285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027768572,0.000024931549,0.00032424327,0.00043374393,0.000023586868,0.000119039796,0.0040452215,0.00041649106,0.00019490148,0.8018187,0.11905923,0.07351221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007984413,0.000016043048,0.0005445533,0.0017773812,0.000010135675,0.000239838,0.00214765,0.00043457223,0.00013999609,0.62776893,0.3668904,0.00002259207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004230908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004199517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016185945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004556955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052642124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036135674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889275746","doi":"","title":"Constituting Restorative Justice: A Case Study Exploring Volunteers’ Experiences of Meaning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UWSpace (University of Waterloo)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Restorative justice; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Criminology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.04881090903749694,"score_gpt":0.2884501886111423,"score_spread":0.23963927957364536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889275746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778056,0.0006534322,0.00226253,0.006880823,0.00025029905,0.00020594931,0.000030926192,0.000041844254,0.011868617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919767,0.00064889935,0.0014811513,0.0010142263,0.00008683493,0.0001912639,0.0000311875,0.00004433678,0.0045255655],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98996115,0.007603005,0.00015160051,0.00040800762,0.00050332845,0.0013729227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990444,0.005131374,0.0006213548,0.0004713365,0.0005567627,0.0027750386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00929508,0.0009855796,0.00090552063,0.0015101129,0.022920767,0.0053268312,0.0027056257,0.004423033,0.0027152488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014142178,0.00072545017,0.0007471449,0.0011531322,0.015240196,0.0052884454,0.011566427,0.0060941153,0.0005242472],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059599395,0.0001708769,0.0019423459,0.000069622554,0.0000048654624,0.0069695073,0.9803947,0.000048110374,0.0005154286,0.003238931,0.0014500081,0.0051359646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000081030175,0.00017818532,0.00084625796,0.00010103945,0.000005539956,0.0021662787,0.9785453,0.00013367883,0.00018690908,0.0008751681,0.016934758,0.00001878975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005465401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015076891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022920767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027427073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004174984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04915762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889546689","doi":"10.7916/d8vh75cm","title":"Popular Culture and Legal Pluralism: Narrative as law. By Wendy A. Adams","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Narrative; Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Legal history; Legal culture; Political science; Legal realism; Law and economics; Philosophy; Legal profession; Epistemology","score_opus":0.016070622659464934,"score_gpt":0.26599272659041334,"score_spread":0.2499221039309484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889546689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021004783,0.31023902,0.0018554778,0.31915522,0.0040384317,0.00003223579,0.000087848195,0.000046829053,0.34354022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7554722,0.08103116,0.0011841442,0.018917374,0.0021371872,0.000105684536,0.00006973939,0.00007957329,0.14100294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985159,0.0010327459,0.00004246351,0.00009584608,0.00022593049,0.00008713512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983448,0.0009871473,0.00020426781,0.00007543601,0.00017860669,0.00020973601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014427293,0.00053302204,0.00024740453,0.0011853465,0.006524795,0.008184031,0.00089523,0.0027044858,0.004247466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036898262,0.00030572177,0.00018133059,0.0018741186,0.016314052,0.011610794,0.0032566153,0.0030403403,0.0006664142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020254916,0.000041339892,0.00048369158,0.00017951598,0.000007819526,0.0002976522,0.09425896,0.00010718602,0.00015482433,0.69190514,0.16846614,0.04407748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007382291,0.000013263424,0.00060137786,0.0005384006,0.0000037735128,0.00026075743,0.047624655,0.00014070391,0.0001144553,0.11687909,0.83380467,0.000011499223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011612238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015292878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011612238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042311857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028729187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030699551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890213531","doi":"","title":"E-Legislation: Law-Making in the Digital Age","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03652537517308075,"score_gpt":0.3070949287537616,"score_spread":0.27056955358068085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890213531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018959252,0.01667156,0.015254272,0.26446545,0.0016846722,0.000046701927,0.0001500318,0.00015685293,0.6826113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.798499,0.016443165,0.008174417,0.059169415,0.0033641148,0.000109665816,0.00011944892,0.00018148766,0.113939285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932788,0.0037157673,0.00027033244,0.000643946,0.0013549922,0.000736221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734812,0.019930977,0.0013691392,0.001641113,0.0017314226,0.0018461562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009124184,0.00031835353,0.00041267005,0.0020302131,0.006292836,0.025129013,0.0017031757,0.01423435,0.023176048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025025427,0.00038655687,0.0005032783,0.0028996016,0.02567759,0.027762836,0.006533936,0.0076137376,0.0020309126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006922562,0.000020705778,0.00035498774,0.000037693553,0.0000024611088,0.00009258029,0.001780959,0.00012502994,0.00009734027,0.96213955,0.018868942,0.016472774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000921622,0.000019065208,0.0009903533,0.0005222771,0.0000070423976,0.00019502989,0.005856122,0.0005769603,0.00046239866,0.59195054,0.39938337,0.000027692293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006645657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009072687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025129013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057942388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009458723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077531576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892100749","doi":"10.7202/1050723ar","title":"The Court &amp; the Cataracts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ontario History","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Appeal; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Law; High Court; Value (mathematics); Arbitration; Order (exchange); Queen (butterfly); Political science; Business","score_opus":0.034277762368954544,"score_gpt":0.2654681070430109,"score_spread":0.23119034467405633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892100749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011283481,0.0041799913,0.00042547542,0.08404,0.001306499,0.000068934256,0.000534392,0.00004958225,0.89811164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12845278,0.0019124825,0.0002631949,0.022562807,0.0003704249,0.000047535403,0.00014259717,0.000041106305,0.8462071],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976744,0.00012687639,0.000049995513,0.00021810814,0.0010908529,0.00083977066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985026,0.00017396579,0.00006913746,0.00007957089,0.0008623252,0.00031239155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085763016,0.0002905182,0.00021360673,0.00068765227,0.021492643,0.0053819665,0.00093650055,0.0042435373,0.03276782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042090854,0.00033307358,0.0003204449,0.0010001432,0.0069344467,0.0013364225,0.0020404467,0.004306052,0.0036964144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029851446,0.000015812353,0.0026711482,0.00004886641,0.0000057624047,0.0010195903,0.005981009,0.000072217386,0.0003932633,0.38908502,0.5803064,0.020371012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000593656,0.0000029494122,0.002690463,0.000059255955,0.0000040484824,0.00012673257,0.0021644335,0.000050299615,0.00008640828,0.0050869486,0.989711,0.000011546062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94435614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9741013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055643857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047337294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05164745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3434577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896233774","doi":"10.5038/1911-9933.12.2.1529","title":"“You Could See Rage”: Visual Testimony in Post-Genocide Guatemala","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genocide Studies and Prevention","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Rage (emotion); Narrative; Human rights; Power (physics); Maya; Politics; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Art; Literature; Epistemology; Philosophy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03581455595269639,"score_gpt":0.37878234276665096,"score_spread":0.34296778681395457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896233774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9127082,0.0058552693,0.0008250456,0.043801077,0.0005998083,0.000096863245,0.0002206765,0.000033242868,0.035859782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99115574,0.0022488558,0.00030537427,0.003557574,0.0001235518,0.000044588727,0.00003661569,0.000015283791,0.0025124948],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967752,0.0023812912,0.000074110205,0.00013620517,0.00021380052,0.0004194107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99462974,0.0035872424,0.0008176705,0.0002719232,0.0003190643,0.00037436647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030832507,0.0004534212,0.00029135754,0.001770342,0.015661296,0.004174605,0.0011947914,0.0043427264,0.0033268016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018758569,0.00029303264,0.00021110938,0.0017859362,0.008188363,0.0024995783,0.009792583,0.0038191408,0.0003476158],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000612432,0.000029884892,0.0038655126,0.00023886752,0.000016817725,0.008058974,0.95821655,0.00006236469,0.00090013817,0.006549195,0.008967842,0.013032606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006333083,0.00006259065,0.009993314,0.00062860973,0.000016405756,0.0032441886,0.9446141,0.00010376691,0.00047127504,0.002022537,0.038811002,0.000025846235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027004762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0788538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027004762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004088458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018276776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053695142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896497762","doi":"10.1353/gpr.2018.0036","title":"Indigenous Women’s Writing and the Cultural Study of Law by Cheryl Suzack","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Great Plains research","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Gender studies; Sociology; Law and literature; Law; Scholarship; Mainstream; Economic Justice; Media studies; Political science","score_opus":0.08434624314543991,"score_gpt":0.4149039862860511,"score_spread":0.33055774314061115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896497762","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036293946,0.19064313,0.00022264005,0.6759721,0.01444888,0.000052815878,0.00005411929,0.00004062798,0.08227171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5720031,0.14682464,0.0009616323,0.078699365,0.014866944,0.00018045408,0.00008427343,0.00017331193,0.18620627],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963051,0.0017129937,0.00009373022,0.0002764169,0.0011060848,0.0005057377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943243,0.002490846,0.0004806789,0.00016417773,0.0015237937,0.0010163363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037950268,0.00071255496,0.0006096329,0.002008358,0.01923119,0.0074781524,0.0015819352,0.002931227,0.004103108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064172973,0.0004937897,0.00025111975,0.002309919,0.01314457,0.0049853055,0.0048856814,0.0063046627,0.00060654205],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023869059,0.000041256706,0.0008934233,0.00036552062,0.000013797037,0.0010220257,0.3444024,0.00005064885,0.00035982663,0.054471314,0.5696718,0.028684217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053158456,0.000018815328,0.0025202355,0.00077882025,0.000009814742,0.00033027018,0.19763501,0.000034589004,0.000135783,0.003154923,0.79534733,0.000029081148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19030096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25787994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19030096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010950727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014052775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37838656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896733936","doi":"10.29173/alr2504","title":"Claire L’Heureux-Dubé: A Life, Constance Backhouse (Vancouver: UBC Press for the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History, 2017)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology; Theology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.038621642569408594,"score_gpt":0.2959383308733977,"score_spread":0.2573166883039891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896733936","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000436476,0.2540814,0.00020172632,0.688445,0.014451998,0.000019482288,0.00025246118,0.000056378063,0.042055126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021518119,0.12069243,0.00062454597,0.38579395,0.0059180725,0.00009058627,0.0002764925,0.00019589964,0.46488982],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758613,0.00051636575,0.00008454613,0.00026477812,0.0011218989,0.0004262677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939628,0.0017185857,0.00017497287,0.0001611494,0.0027397706,0.0012426814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032002588,0.0005788573,0.0007310169,0.0013124339,0.011855808,0.0070668627,0.002034967,0.008055927,0.030594988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011137416,0.0006537339,0.00033998856,0.0019201337,0.004047136,0.005844356,0.0023517467,0.008414231,0.010548597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040830855,0.0000026960715,0.000059842834,0.000053486252,0.0000013678109,0.00002681452,0.0002611025,0.0000055523496,0.000011335643,0.0046008322,0.9876924,0.0072804005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030619785,0.000001940087,0.0004805833,0.00033871285,0.0000021737897,0.000048454516,0.0009486957,0.0000091925485,0.000026843627,0.001187402,0.9969426,0.0000102407985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62621045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8607154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37378955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013837881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034994427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75198174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896810973","doi":"10.3968/10599","title":"Dialectical Thinking of Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy: From the Understanding in the Chinese Context","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Dialectic; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Context (archaeology); Philosophy of law; Sociology; China; Legal formalism; Legal realism; Legal positivism; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Legal research; Comparative law; Black letter law; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03777946895890979,"score_gpt":0.31056347576717563,"score_spread":0.27278400680826587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896810973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52092034,0.031338908,0.024803367,0.06741545,0.00054307125,0.00016403438,0.00007394659,0.000049505496,0.3546915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98793054,0.004764695,0.0018818711,0.0011485183,0.00009399732,0.000047887588,0.00001440208,0.000009563955,0.004108668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828833,0.0010363536,0.000064169006,0.00015936451,0.00029860076,0.00015315019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901104,0.0006226858,0.00008735193,0.000058333615,0.00011678317,0.00010380998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035230352,0.0005691506,0.00046266045,0.0022675497,0.0043679364,0.0060140677,0.0009998154,0.0016793021,0.0013373125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017539664,0.0002573355,0.0003303933,0.0025693902,0.026226114,0.008519065,0.0030300783,0.0023749853,0.000102558886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006780819,0.00001469603,0.001180056,0.000083784544,0.0000037866118,0.00027689472,0.11072959,0.00012187651,0.0001989106,0.87985355,0.00044389683,0.00708622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031459724,0.00006479596,0.012983049,0.0009886072,0.000040116636,0.0006463226,0.21883322,0.003783235,0.000773832,0.66046053,0.10134718,0.000047727266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039974656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024814522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039974656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013988582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009371858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10149473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897197407","doi":"","title":"Obscenity and Nationalism: Constitutional Freedom of Sexual Expression in Comparative Perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Law; Morality; Jurisprudence; Political science; Offensive; Sociology","score_opus":0.024377616774813312,"score_gpt":0.3305853834087768,"score_spread":0.3062077666339635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897197407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06838295,0.018383162,0.0059508756,0.0062053883,0.00019456127,0.000018032722,0.00004802429,0.000017725728,0.9007992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98068,0.004885939,0.0012710313,0.0009350268,0.00013013833,0.000031385294,0.00003536732,0.000025404544,0.012005684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966047,0.0015732973,0.00010613131,0.000394484,0.0007155489,0.0006058924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980411,0.001075119,0.00015893033,0.0002421171,0.0002902572,0.00019241466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034866752,0.00030754186,0.0005443396,0.0025896034,0.0134042585,0.010899715,0.0009902677,0.002433751,0.0036305978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032438182,0.00028398217,0.0003714237,0.0024670064,0.06946807,0.006020362,0.0050569554,0.0042312117,0.00017818922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025977806,0.000002368435,0.00010435251,0.00001599431,0.0000016102568,0.000038671642,0.009048398,0.000040576106,0.00005121548,0.98883075,0.00016147966,0.001702083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001691303,0.00004712599,0.0056059975,0.0007428797,0.000033901586,0.00035789065,0.027581964,0.00032073236,0.00059377175,0.63447267,0.33017132,0.000054802196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11171895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13746779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11171895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0243079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01037563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22213733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897199180","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2018.21.4.545","title":"Seropolitics and the Criminal Accusation of HIV Non-Disclosure in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Biopower; Criminal law; Public health; Political science; Governmentality; False accusation; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.03270405688430883,"score_gpt":0.3158556688594977,"score_spread":0.28315161197518884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897199180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6849695,0.016909553,0.0011854831,0.0752966,0.0004938375,0.00020501601,0.00042319435,0.0000477503,0.22046904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727476,0.0052997987,0.00029261332,0.006805339,0.000049927407,0.000016486685,0.000067856534,0.000016613265,0.014703613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926859,0.0008936656,0.00021090348,0.00048015438,0.0032137954,0.0025156036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885699,0.003274068,0.0015549886,0.00031980398,0.004391094,0.0018901393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035237735,0.00022725301,0.0004052557,0.002298207,0.02337107,0.0069444734,0.0021309168,0.0029289478,0.0036120072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017844394,0.0003916936,0.00030023168,0.0032370323,0.010447921,0.0014074878,0.0035226904,0.0056965007,0.00014625574],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020660515,0.00026429334,0.14039186,0.0006621872,0.00012129763,0.006092165,0.15629463,0.0018209183,0.0014528021,0.49639043,0.06876229,0.12754053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001032386,0.00013273314,0.33481303,0.0019792493,0.00030681785,0.002354373,0.15098906,0.0034889346,0.0030928056,0.025509117,0.476802,0.00042854017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12684911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12684911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21744873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9203591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897829938","doi":"10.1111/1468-2427.12694","title":"State Theory from the Street Altar: The Muscles, the Saint and the <i>Amparo</i>","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Urban and Regional Research","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Redress; State (computer science); SAINT; Sociology; Ethnography; Altar; Liminality; Law; Aesthetics; Political science; History; Computer science; Art; Computer security; Anthropology","score_opus":0.06423590364691348,"score_gpt":0.37753134392868976,"score_spread":0.31329544028177625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897829938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60863745,0.0023010569,0.015959695,0.015551682,0.000098297256,0.000043191707,0.00015719935,0.000057757054,0.35719365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968155,0.00020041504,0.00048465878,0.00005948244,0.000010009587,0.000014685117,0.000015789232,0.0000051375528,0.002394363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959165,0.00021924474,0.0000067461774,0.00006361435,0.000048181522,0.00007062834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994654,0.00026153104,0.000115479066,0.0000558408,0.000052635474,0.000049150734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067188876,0.00018020369,0.00017331626,0.0011121708,0.0055346033,0.004377837,0.0005116589,0.0008073401,0.0054484555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011075067,0.00013108729,0.0001899759,0.000978619,0.01742957,0.0027840543,0.002332803,0.001030188,0.00011386596],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016910892,0.000015334354,0.0036797167,0.000044720204,0.000004535776,0.000120890654,0.10092849,0.00039449788,0.00013576193,0.8862062,0.0011954288,0.0072576287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025872096,0.000096580516,0.030747652,0.00069819525,0.000068457375,0.0002859966,0.35441792,0.0032116799,0.0006413532,0.387451,0.22231731,0.000037913418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028256625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03933049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028256625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005998721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019903963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05618429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899824974","doi":"","title":"Becoming to Belong: An Essay on Agency and Democratic Rights","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"YorkSpace (York University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Dignity; Agency (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Human rights; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Environmental ethics; Law; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022459649838122677,"score_gpt":0.28612263756362577,"score_spread":0.2636629877255031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899824974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0093320655,0.017323125,0.008006718,0.09687698,0.0026425587,0.000042488962,0.000026108055,0.000032416912,0.86571753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7445194,0.014128413,0.0030980762,0.023838662,0.0036263836,0.00021308623,0.000053147232,0.00016019042,0.2103627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99190605,0.005252764,0.00015380324,0.0007122881,0.0010381374,0.0009368433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969549,0.0019503265,0.00021710985,0.00023516467,0.0002441914,0.00039821467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004698087,0.00062077306,0.00045415203,0.0008773454,0.010172797,0.011890879,0.0009968978,0.005172261,0.005533417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006536936,0.00025913405,0.0006722359,0.0009278406,0.038984217,0.012868126,0.005811286,0.008559961,0.0012593019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002818951,0.000007427974,0.00003950496,0.000017185452,8.804057e-7,0.000026414818,0.009223099,0.000036213914,0.000020141151,0.9818988,0.0065085976,0.0022188805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000747562,0.000013633585,0.0002337744,0.00027015814,0.0000033449812,0.00013153754,0.009216451,0.00013461629,0.000092891045,0.5649715,0.42491344,0.000011164633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029020607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002581534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011890879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046354616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037311602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033632815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900469433","doi":"10.1080/15426432.2018.1501895","title":"Restorative Justice Today: Practical Applications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work Social Thought","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Architectural engineering; Engineering; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.05576654676197359,"score_gpt":0.4110185390079347,"score_spread":0.35525199224596116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900469433","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008534316,0.11056978,0.023212507,0.63576174,0.0077607185,0.0003850854,0.00013827503,0.0006288277,0.2130087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4517618,0.22785328,0.1371663,0.11487545,0.0119189145,0.0018043856,0.0002618087,0.00030678764,0.054051235],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543023,0.0029890982,0.00018855529,0.00020996362,0.000852142,0.00033001436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987087,0.008129724,0.00041630853,0.0006803148,0.0023221332,0.0013645053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012123441,0.0012417104,0.0006625067,0.0022736422,0.004986174,0.0059428466,0.002382406,0.009088622,0.026634471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019209363,0.00033661566,0.0007998702,0.0018573747,0.0077572064,0.009065826,0.008399107,0.0057908176,0.0030248684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069543945,0.00045986983,0.0017468012,0.0014348556,0.000018329212,0.00061029044,0.0069965106,0.0007597161,0.0002618878,0.17902404,0.238953,0.5696652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096861215,0.00027313313,0.0033780138,0.00795231,0.000051976473,0.0015505046,0.026361054,0.0015916006,0.0005336197,0.32684368,0.63124335,0.00012384981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029779803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010255173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026634471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040803873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008625382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.089101255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900954575","doi":"10.1017/s0307883318000330","title":"Ethical Exchanges in Translation, Adaptation and Dramaturgy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theatre Research International","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Brill; Dramaturgy; History; Theology; Sociology; Art; Classics; Literature; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17111999770415945,"score_gpt":0.4612057190752162,"score_spread":0.2900857213710567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900954575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007927127,0.34216952,0.010710458,0.19766991,0.010814,0.00014422643,0.0001215426,0.00021694419,0.43022624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5530138,0.19476923,0.011492057,0.027177982,0.0090030385,0.0007440701,0.00028436436,0.0006654743,0.20284995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9719357,0.024266472,0.0005325242,0.0005956888,0.0016350189,0.0010344897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98956406,0.0070803175,0.0009170951,0.00079501065,0.000888952,0.00075453153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014468446,0.0012180546,0.00082417147,0.0019215973,0.0067403307,0.016810803,0.0013477729,0.0050103744,0.015103616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018824523,0.00061756046,0.0004607934,0.002804137,0.030648066,0.013071694,0.008955767,0.006460658,0.0034135217],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050210114,0.00006548708,0.00029191698,0.0008488182,0.00001956955,0.00029046516,0.06690747,0.00025660978,0.00022147129,0.6030768,0.22663915,0.10133197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016001977,0.000031413736,0.0007172434,0.002698312,0.0000082634315,0.00035197943,0.033669014,0.00015729337,0.00027204465,0.21674591,0.7453044,0.000028097984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044489857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004740394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016810803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00682283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011097329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07651734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901146050","doi":"10.1177/1329878x18803378","title":"Social media and social change lawyering: influencing change and silencing dissent","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Media International Australia","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Legal profession; Law; Dissent; Political science; Social media; Disadvantage; Social change; Sociology","score_opus":0.17862325430722562,"score_gpt":0.3739378707173778,"score_spread":0.19531461641015216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901146050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7898775,0.00053144654,0.0013620707,0.01791737,0.00018089474,0.000069549315,0.000025750018,0.00003170848,0.19000378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676174,0.000099193385,0.00015199493,0.00058441196,0.00002282205,0.000023586865,0.0000045446295,0.000009419143,0.0023423275],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896994,0.0075296406,0.00020797964,0.00049373147,0.0010793954,0.000989847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684017,0.024505828,0.0032034297,0.00078183314,0.0013203076,0.0017869315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072993007,0.0002690594,0.0002040482,0.0017894479,0.010814928,0.0096441265,0.0010294546,0.0021247156,0.007737292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033188023,0.00017593923,0.00024725456,0.0012860236,0.019624086,0.0047431956,0.006549409,0.0022416657,0.00049438427],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012826885,0.00069724134,0.050369408,0.00016963281,0.00005034322,0.0006837513,0.79344505,0.00024924183,0.0013946211,0.09076513,0.004708645,0.057338703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006954979,0.00018091286,0.051877324,0.00022148075,0.000056720077,0.00013735483,0.84002113,0.001079288,0.0015177277,0.044570293,0.0602143,0.00005395168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011716204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0192782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011716204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055111605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004938754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03998649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902375378","doi":"","title":"Learning from Larry: Pragmatism and the Habits of Legal Space","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Pragmatism; Action (physics); Metaphysics; Habit; Epistemology; Relation (database); Power (physics); Sociology; Database transaction; Space (punctuation); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.003995019533306467,"score_gpt":0.2290553219423048,"score_spread":0.22506030240899833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902375378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.110285,0.011874672,0.05104947,0.26447576,0.001386099,0.00008682042,0.000038264378,0.00026346557,0.5605405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.934675,0.002378711,0.0055847764,0.011072684,0.0003104123,0.00007726912,0.000015674,0.00009523809,0.045790337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946155,0.00400479,0.00010336584,0.00033245567,0.00059251493,0.00035141854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952265,0.0032350288,0.00048701282,0.00039430527,0.0003252521,0.0003319861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050554946,0.00033802213,0.00034655942,0.0006163424,0.005626983,0.009146936,0.0010733502,0.0030868042,0.0034599742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010665816,0.00031347745,0.00025331668,0.00083169347,0.03672808,0.014670421,0.0050560148,0.0070520565,0.00080630375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011599093,0.000015262403,0.00023113875,0.00003119016,0.0000019026485,0.00011054719,0.08802079,0.00012521681,0.00013263224,0.89422077,0.0072368393,0.009862155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011757711,0.000047340756,0.00044888514,0.00020402225,0.0000025963946,0.0002629547,0.059531912,0.00058459514,0.00031326656,0.6916069,0.24695925,0.000026527463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002715968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031487965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009146936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039007193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003360535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028301835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902709051","doi":"10.5334/kula.28","title":"Documenting State Violence: (Symbolic) Annihilation &amp; Archives of Survival","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"KULA knowledge creation dissemination and preservation studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Sociology; Ideology; Context (archaeology); Criminology; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Politics; History; Literature","score_opus":0.05416575450708096,"score_gpt":0.42097534596919894,"score_spread":0.366809591462118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902709051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6033342,0.012690148,0.02129577,0.027869876,0.0007888552,0.0001421486,0.00056194916,0.00043771093,0.33287933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852127,0.0020444342,0.003003975,0.00032274466,0.000083354505,0.00005315573,0.00007136015,0.000054444103,0.009153803],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971186,0.0018452632,0.00012292917,0.00020552942,0.00044938654,0.00025832592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908557,0.0055561503,0.0010870137,0.0015628453,0.00057913695,0.0003591159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037470846,0.00039542923,0.0002721432,0.0040020095,0.0095291305,0.011650705,0.0014565346,0.0016926676,0.006143205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009587639,0.0002939818,0.00021663203,0.0037427205,0.024958098,0.011965612,0.009198409,0.0024006264,0.0005417732],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041339892,0.000028699742,0.0032411995,0.00024186481,0.000008345899,0.0009066866,0.76316494,0.000154324,0.0004886871,0.17370723,0.004876091,0.0531406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072044086,0.000047005982,0.003491716,0.00091210206,0.000018342444,0.0017312791,0.6271397,0.00023534258,0.0019278242,0.037828572,0.3266322,0.000028690423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042756316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075078267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011650705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003394852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003690468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0246315},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2903778042","doi":"10.4324/9781315091297-11","title":"Cameras in the Courtroom – Not Without My Consent","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.06506449828416092,"score_gpt":0.33472949596942625,"score_spread":0.2696649976852653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903778042","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026256677,0.011804035,0.0068293912,0.30374843,0.0839256,0.0009267797,0.0025810883,0.0006313305,0.5869278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026616734,0.010109927,0.004109333,0.22354542,0.01664341,0.0015391485,0.0011067088,0.000658713,0.71567065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938891,0.002117422,0.0004862512,0.00070565013,0.0021559969,0.0006456134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98966855,0.003144552,0.0004526417,0.0022910815,0.0029128334,0.0015302089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063154567,0.0007460087,0.00086226553,0.0007673947,0.0054264595,0.006264474,0.0019870705,0.0071097696,0.08524123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030241545,0.0006823016,0.0004896984,0.00089003757,0.0057988144,0.011281301,0.004369566,0.011036687,0.070399344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015458598,0.00002034391,0.00011263345,0.000116206276,0.0000037783989,0.0001868769,0.0021633594,0.000024707246,0.00031175956,0.05135884,0.9243301,0.021355964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028700906,0.000006715174,0.0000657064,0.00016938818,0.0000011415691,0.00014209267,0.000690792,0.000013723903,0.000078925084,0.0027298995,0.9960906,0.000008130058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005321755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010814607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08524123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031028884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008278877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2851603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907057936","doi":"10.1215/00138282-43.2.35","title":"Virtues and Christian Virtues, Vices and Gross Vices: Some Accusations Against Bernard Mandeville Reconsidered","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Language Notes","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Citation; Download; History; Literature; Library science; Art; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.011752347473914949,"score_gpt":0.2744921335301947,"score_spread":0.26273978605627973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907057936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1640222,0.025644053,0.00084506825,0.38586965,0.0027709885,0.000040181298,0.00006330926,0.000043783257,0.4207007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93371683,0.0025673476,0.00019506649,0.03391246,0.00092677784,0.0000235833,0.000017171014,0.000019680696,0.028621154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956813,0.0025011734,0.00012695545,0.00030218804,0.0008663569,0.0005219419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947066,0.0036409146,0.00054468727,0.00023060398,0.0006153417,0.00026194303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004184046,0.00029474826,0.00039601154,0.0008274213,0.013219532,0.0038421731,0.0007596521,0.0077094636,0.003905521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012318979,0.00028221213,0.00024440634,0.0008152673,0.018367523,0.0034362322,0.0025839207,0.0106161535,0.0004086987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008827738,0.000029725998,0.0030132832,0.0001135288,0.000017866674,0.0015361902,0.13944413,0.00009443362,0.0005459015,0.7187854,0.116521284,0.019809991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046799058,0.000071960545,0.015757358,0.00092012354,0.000039526385,0.0015520292,0.09389298,0.00035253714,0.0009891302,0.12329479,0.7629578,0.0001250713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030031217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051054027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030031217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039512482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017072895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059712827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907199906","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-0999","title":"Feminist Judgments","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oñati Socio-legal Series","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Humanities; Politics; Sociology; Transitional justice; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.0176409924479143,"score_gpt":0.2971136905430256,"score_spread":0.2794726980951113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907199906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006199461,0.00593354,0.003630592,0.102344096,0.006686162,0.000052291787,0.00025331855,0.000037452035,0.8748631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.483328,0.0072891586,0.0048471414,0.047880854,0.004756148,0.0003028608,0.00033421774,0.00027034304,0.45099127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914317,0.004074479,0.00023814617,0.0011534358,0.0023449287,0.00075722113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99177635,0.0055186893,0.0003460525,0.00043760048,0.0015715362,0.00034977339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071143284,0.0005735603,0.00034935164,0.0017471594,0.01029997,0.006075471,0.0010810755,0.0027235486,0.031064972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017727189,0.00021268812,0.00028008196,0.0010836631,0.014036677,0.0044830823,0.0030772884,0.004509266,0.0032947704],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001685265,0.000017538361,0.0002428195,0.000094951734,0.0000036463098,0.00009933373,0.038693614,0.00007283563,0.00021008344,0.7723264,0.16628316,0.0219388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020517973,0.000004807084,0.0001800619,0.00018675665,0.0000010256488,0.00004164959,0.010967801,0.000025255127,0.00014937982,0.046626013,0.94181067,0.0000044876406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035302876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00632703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031064972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005844184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030188935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103922665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907599528","doi":"","title":"Welcoming Monsters: Disability as a Liminal Legal Concept","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Sociology; Normative; Mainstream; Liminality; Political philosophy; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Law; Politics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011130693692715271,"score_gpt":0.2994140435117157,"score_spread":0.2882833498190004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907599528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07953295,0.009331225,0.0039261417,0.26612568,0.0038548284,0.00004458976,0.00005137725,0.000074439864,0.6370588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8635114,0.0028289368,0.0004503863,0.02042471,0.0015946305,0.000030070436,0.000018190665,0.00004447527,0.11109728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99457633,0.0031458272,0.0000806426,0.00026009095,0.00060342305,0.0013336897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689734,0.0013684557,0.0002863201,0.00013422422,0.00023401773,0.0010797408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004556674,0.00035014504,0.0003572607,0.00094340526,0.01765919,0.010471838,0.0013439102,0.006584312,0.011335708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066985497,0.00021113957,0.00029443033,0.0008726457,0.030843047,0.009394294,0.0102282055,0.008566317,0.0013110514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020999147,0.000041864514,0.0006184929,0.000041500865,0.0000027122085,0.0008039734,0.10713218,0.00005264675,0.00012584621,0.84758884,0.033084784,0.010486205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015040696,0.00005799294,0.0012531667,0.00025981126,0.000007768202,0.0008609726,0.1619272,0.00024059619,0.00024875192,0.13597047,0.69911903,0.000039281247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016595917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028438378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01765919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050746608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004216587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037921667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908718997","doi":"10.3366/elr.2019.0523","title":"Sense and Sensibilities: A Feminist Critique of Legal Interventions against Sexual Violence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Law; Law reform; Sexual violence; Sociology; Battle; Action (physics); Criminology; Criminal law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.025980044774639745,"score_gpt":0.34731524723245993,"score_spread":0.3213352024578202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908718997","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012386267,0.14741789,0.008792632,0.5472275,0.002876111,0.000044613338,0.00005072826,0.000050379353,0.28115392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8560821,0.05070721,0.0023649887,0.061962347,0.003568895,0.00021261262,0.000027560767,0.00008922999,0.024985101],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.960154,0.031923827,0.00057523476,0.0010989951,0.00448061,0.0017673325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766757,0.020071434,0.0009584569,0.00055949105,0.0012179993,0.0005169267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026103104,0.00086798886,0.0009366933,0.004536472,0.011776488,0.011881174,0.0040246737,0.009641999,0.003396617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025914533,0.000514442,0.0007642738,0.0024298376,0.121631294,0.010530905,0.008456175,0.009956131,0.00044570485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058223304,0.000007623733,0.00006768443,0.0001718478,0.000006155263,0.000085155094,0.025083594,0.00009232731,0.00004114946,0.96391654,0.0053521553,0.0051700966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035340323,0.000044526332,0.00063825207,0.0018577443,0.000025734817,0.00017300087,0.035633724,0.0001632634,0.0002311146,0.49904245,0.4621303,0.000024496898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023002021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023243139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026103104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016266607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014107988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13804811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909057151","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v8n1p1","title":"Legal Documents – Modernising the Formalities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.07668179809485112,"score_gpt":0.4442976956962829,"score_spread":0.36761589760143176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909057151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016943675,0.056656376,0.043738116,0.17347735,0.003588529,0.00010268148,0.0002630213,0.0006067595,0.70462346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63750994,0.05271233,0.049367484,0.025140718,0.0041539515,0.00022234628,0.0005739493,0.00075663545,0.22956264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99168617,0.0035742954,0.00041261577,0.00070401555,0.0030921006,0.00053075125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98308843,0.0075598336,0.0014638428,0.0039500655,0.0028489293,0.00108881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010815392,0.00034317028,0.00021587861,0.0024793018,0.002564437,0.01191368,0.0014155147,0.004361591,0.013082723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021393802,0.00030253496,0.00025300775,0.0025869221,0.018235713,0.02171795,0.0058956253,0.005576971,0.0026500872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034553925,0.00001266022,0.00008401699,0.000066540975,0.0000017844707,0.000017311484,0.0011020987,0.00007116666,0.000116139316,0.9559468,0.0097700115,0.03280807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006505815,0.000015839516,0.00040758206,0.00046906798,0.0000032670978,0.00009768532,0.0012067538,0.00016900964,0.0003999342,0.30883616,0.6883747,0.000013427422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008988759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007948218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013082723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006837532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010259051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057197988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910206215","doi":"10.22024/unikent/03/fal.652","title":"Exploring Relationships between Time, Law and Social Ordering: A Curated Conversation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Sociology; Race (biology); Relation (database); Colonialism; Epistemology; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Communication; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1200416963790931,"score_gpt":0.25633628737877157,"score_spread":0.13629459099967847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910206215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5635417,0.008427113,0.11261837,0.13140741,0.005369281,0.0018791654,0.0021738508,0.0007364018,0.17384666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94749445,0.0024130214,0.013167571,0.011270998,0.0006565342,0.0018476202,0.0005205154,0.0011570175,0.021472251],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96146375,0.03268327,0.0007185591,0.0017816804,0.001486599,0.0018662371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9400134,0.053026296,0.0011017803,0.0019525649,0.002105823,0.0018001532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019304791,0.0016866182,0.0017190351,0.0030825327,0.031900372,0.013348484,0.0036054337,0.008217913,0.008236596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048422564,0.0011469759,0.0010848271,0.0034520517,0.034986705,0.01730144,0.020286413,0.014879563,0.0014594232],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003618227,0.000015120519,0.00010548372,0.000108894936,0.0000053937783,0.0005295682,0.9798019,0.00007309536,0.0008631762,0.014563176,0.0022079446,0.001690166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021616184,0.000033146982,0.0004088804,0.00050441985,0.000013815596,0.0005409528,0.8086525,0.00046353045,0.00095823454,0.009743481,0.17860332,0.000056070796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011098736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01140773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031900372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011820604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052964683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10209477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910232314","doi":"10.1353/vpr.2018.0050","title":"The Confusion, Uncertainty, and Dissatisfaction with the Legal Protection of Newspaper and Periodical Titles in Nineteenth-Century England","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian periodicals review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; CLARITY; Confusion; Context (archaeology); Competition (biology); Law; Period (music); Value (mathematics); History; Political science; Psychology; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.009764774715300805,"score_gpt":0.2710356617064012,"score_spread":0.2612708869911004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910232314","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28811875,0.5247081,0.00083404797,0.07641258,0.0012250915,0.000035828343,0.00009095187,0.000014747938,0.10855996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8394259,0.11958466,0.0003698944,0.008211775,0.00054172083,0.000018843495,0.00003921685,0.00001642719,0.031791624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926952,0.002954735,0.0005901191,0.0005926175,0.0022745705,0.0008927152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848102,0.010229038,0.0014260875,0.00030913667,0.0025198672,0.00070580596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010488829,0.00013891468,0.0005171628,0.0029500958,0.0050612325,0.009750499,0.0008299229,0.002737912,0.0023875001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015657857,0.0005586207,0.00015442197,0.003432852,0.014079835,0.0032621718,0.0024811022,0.0030549383,0.0002814614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013934451,0.00005444241,0.0076365285,0.0040738676,0.000054963784,0.002834638,0.28160274,0.0006658161,0.0019267093,0.50048923,0.029511381,0.17101045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023399441,0.0000745353,0.049808133,0.004150434,0.000048531958,0.0007250282,0.06651524,0.00016572567,0.00047193674,0.021210423,0.8567288,0.000077853154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34617624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51923305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34617624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029375099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018073216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68832254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910550699","doi":"10.1093/pq/pqy060","title":"The Functions of Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Philosophical Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Law; Jurisprudence; Function (biology); Positivism; Natural order; Comparative law; Private law; Scientific law; Positive law; Sociology; Black letter law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03335237354130844,"score_gpt":0.30559520641080123,"score_spread":0.2722428328694928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910550699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011928767,0.013495598,0.116493404,0.05016496,0.0012795758,0.00011795331,0.00024949745,0.00038655783,0.8058837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8847752,0.0073891855,0.028187519,0.0098397825,0.0019676178,0.0004915972,0.0003043601,0.00034444206,0.06670034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98909956,0.0056931986,0.0004567277,0.0017626601,0.0019268808,0.0010608669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99136263,0.0045911144,0.00055266055,0.0020163273,0.0009891483,0.00048821006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00844875,0.001006065,0.00074028794,0.003409793,0.00572519,0.01687298,0.0026312484,0.0059457263,0.009493189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013488069,0.00061236374,0.0009253192,0.0019074887,0.069713645,0.026741046,0.008515498,0.0062869224,0.0026158267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013508826,0.0000010983719,0.0000365075,0.000009709348,8.197011e-7,0.0000071321024,0.0004823632,0.00003088348,0.000016336306,0.9968959,0.00074946653,0.00176851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033355752,0.000008066149,0.00011501734,0.00006325981,0.0000027860447,0.00004602903,0.0005192979,0.0001863982,0.000058033864,0.9284193,0.0705725,0.0000059971576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003413744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015769401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01687298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007719502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056009173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911527189","doi":"10.3138/jrpc.2017-0016","title":"Day of the Woman: Judges 4–5 as Slasher and Rape Revenge Narrative","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religion and Popular Culture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Parallels; Narrative; Girl; Gender studies; Ethnic group; Psychology; Sociology; Art; Literature; Developmental psychology; Anthropology; Engineering","score_opus":0.011377115926357501,"score_gpt":0.2888631295318087,"score_spread":0.2774860136054512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911527189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5786845,0.0034560657,0.001705417,0.047782306,0.0019561423,0.00009325817,0.00004905178,0.000069715774,0.36620346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762151,0.0004010543,0.00027274666,0.0025496625,0.00014482235,0.000024208175,0.000015600934,0.000029153136,0.020347683],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99414754,0.0038789208,0.00008756485,0.000291828,0.00060450897,0.0009896215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979037,0.0010035969,0.00018869602,0.00008359867,0.00030249622,0.00051794155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025320158,0.00032390832,0.00034123161,0.0008295165,0.02566744,0.008954248,0.0011681174,0.003920696,0.0040069884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008357276,0.00044797297,0.00027352496,0.00051646447,0.014313491,0.0038916457,0.004849042,0.0063702343,0.000492177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006234876,0.000035103367,0.001380119,0.000036961417,0.000004233848,0.0023518028,0.91638803,0.000029400928,0.00070612907,0.056929905,0.01679744,0.005278598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008594208,0.000059688067,0.0018940666,0.00011318749,0.0000065065183,0.0008452741,0.8214746,0.000086536085,0.00046375144,0.0030182728,0.17200069,0.000028734265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023652421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06535342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02566744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049017575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002945986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047029495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912318553","doi":"10.4324/9780203855607-31","title":"Rape victims The discourse of rape trials","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.058638375034625816,"score_gpt":0.35996537726300254,"score_spread":0.3013270022283767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912318553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031850874,0.06508775,0.0047066477,0.30972624,0.0036115402,0.000084959545,0.00014387252,0.00007047936,0.58471763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85541385,0.031588644,0.0017801762,0.049792763,0.005717772,0.00028608987,0.00009852298,0.00019535066,0.055126972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9649879,0.027379975,0.0009733044,0.0017475653,0.0034613924,0.0014497894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96971166,0.024867501,0.0017383017,0.0014265239,0.0015807122,0.0006753518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019132305,0.0010379708,0.0011088907,0.004192002,0.019327546,0.021875098,0.0039204094,0.020814931,0.008342643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044336617,0.0007164266,0.0009767839,0.0031380919,0.060095176,0.020856787,0.011865006,0.015530373,0.0014547256],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015044668,0.000008331115,0.0001287291,0.000087675086,0.0000052192436,0.0003343975,0.06541877,0.000049971528,0.00006447221,0.91369706,0.016297055,0.0038933165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036292702,0.000029388599,0.00025061486,0.0015367409,0.000020176463,0.00065605575,0.06205674,0.0001385696,0.0003051337,0.1546699,0.78026116,0.00003921495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010150734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005482201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021875098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0135478545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007390617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10118246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913255679","doi":"10.22215/etd/2010-09145","title":"The role of the Canadian judiciary in the development of the Canadian criminal code of 1892","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Political science; Law; Code (set theory); Humanities; Philosophy; Computer science; Criminal law; Programming language","score_opus":0.012873112694938823,"score_gpt":0.27378055498189097,"score_spread":0.2609074422869521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913255679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13643572,0.017345462,0.0014367582,0.08975962,0.0012102508,0.00016591382,0.0014947418,0.00004928625,0.7521022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8705131,0.006145741,0.0014326308,0.0067931786,0.00019036919,0.000057673744,0.00025254453,0.000058539754,0.11455631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99307126,0.0006509835,0.00013074753,0.00053466845,0.0025274924,0.0030848607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99088824,0.0011170009,0.00032552992,0.00017412433,0.0057526743,0.0017423737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035997494,0.0005096613,0.00032594538,0.0046607293,0.028413974,0.0082306275,0.0014767683,0.0037676701,0.0075454735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017269924,0.00062865455,0.00037792244,0.0051860292,0.01243017,0.0021689744,0.0023648445,0.004947476,0.0006091926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059016023,0.00002590765,0.009307832,0.00009429853,0.000016985143,0.00033636377,0.0392002,0.0008443887,0.00034643812,0.7802668,0.11775482,0.05174687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024240728,0.000028965136,0.09563816,0.0006480536,0.00004387809,0.00014145135,0.021337844,0.0009327559,0.0005025472,0.021713102,0.85882366,0.00016530465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99843854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7272457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27275434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35134885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84350187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913946162","doi":"10.33137/cal.v5i2.32053","title":"Literary Analysis of Law: Reorienting the Connections Between Law and Literature","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statutory law; Law and literature; Interpretation (philosophy); Philosophy of law; Sociology; Common law; Political science; Work (physics); Epistemology; Comparative law; Philosophy; Linguistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.024355897885776717,"score_gpt":0.34859086310769527,"score_spread":0.3242349652219185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913946162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029487936,0.1752101,0.035871346,0.31380323,0.0521109,0.00010662217,0.000115380644,0.00029403213,0.39300045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66485906,0.12631129,0.023165582,0.021652374,0.083842546,0.00038663353,0.00027262958,0.0011100253,0.078399844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433446,0.004152468,0.00020931866,0.00026717785,0.00082628994,0.00021026582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9709019,0.023999961,0.0009919923,0.0011897462,0.0021837698,0.0007325739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055856886,0.00084721216,0.0010305577,0.007242806,0.0065809186,0.018528268,0.0016581921,0.0033700126,0.00609597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016731888,0.00029887827,0.00059231947,0.003469307,0.033648904,0.018783731,0.0041563977,0.00669183,0.0010075902],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002372244,0.000031280848,0.00051235367,0.0005067599,0.000022754806,0.00036001496,0.119702846,0.00015945923,0.00047167335,0.7625284,0.06852785,0.0471529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000776627,0.00002943391,0.0009471333,0.0016184854,0.000013888382,0.00040277702,0.06587277,0.0005244663,0.00041500173,0.3125193,0.6176233,0.000025636502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015101776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036945322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018528268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052721235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023624606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038252115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915618586","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v8n4p98","title":"Modernising the Law of Murder and Manslaughter: Part 2","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homicide; Law; Criminology; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Sociology; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.04179083210195181,"score_gpt":0.31406245897259416,"score_spread":0.2722716268706423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915618586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040612087,0.27695683,0.016346455,0.15812422,0.0077152145,0.0005172525,0.00020501942,0.00013775186,0.4993851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46261555,0.22610766,0.021136083,0.072646976,0.01467962,0.0009492981,0.00029820213,0.00018809491,0.20137852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819523,0.00068907946,0.000088902285,0.00020499024,0.00050195295,0.00031995808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767786,0.0012043527,0.00045268267,0.00026554952,0.00027340004,0.00012622644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003109082,0.000679588,0.00041079707,0.0019577642,0.0023064471,0.0037278025,0.0013351579,0.008686807,0.008346862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053688516,0.0005007247,0.0005746498,0.0013065801,0.011195332,0.0058104377,0.0035361655,0.0063988864,0.0009599175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035424495,0.00020946257,0.0014499553,0.0008336634,0.000025041942,0.00040605766,0.011064525,0.00085537287,0.0018797881,0.83151776,0.04562887,0.10609416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020142956,0.00013918668,0.0070083104,0.0014104787,0.000021137837,0.0005276976,0.0024973806,0.00026791348,0.0019093641,0.16917962,0.81697404,0.000044712626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004043739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007060719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008686807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042720484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004627855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030995965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915734881","doi":"","title":"Ethnicity, Gender and Diversity : Law and Justice on TV","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Rowman & Littlefield eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationality; Ethnic group; Sexual orientation; Diversity (politics); Economic Justice; Race (biology); Law; Gender studies; Gender diversity; Political science; Sociology; Business; Immigration","score_opus":0.05258240862589034,"score_gpt":0.28909106268264306,"score_spread":0.23650865405675273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915734881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006026301,0.02044275,0.00031573902,0.008776123,0.0011405026,0.00001235434,0.000034906203,0.000022432709,0.963229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.115130566,0.01940751,0.0003727531,0.0050768224,0.0014267518,0.00004571409,0.00007158074,0.000077446115,0.8583909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996207,0.00011417733,0.000008723281,0.000031285486,0.00017666146,0.00004836855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977416,0.00011539439,0.000016714193,0.000013699026,0.000037618378,0.00004240631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023028332,0.00023239927,0.00025990998,0.0005495593,0.0033484846,0.0049101864,0.00034051633,0.0011243355,0.014048825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089192827,0.00011898999,0.00016386482,0.0008500338,0.0030358846,0.0029764627,0.0016510708,0.0017633688,0.0020284525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018862074,0.00006241935,0.0011640363,0.00010523812,0.00000530228,0.00028662288,0.021908477,0.00012283957,0.00031540304,0.57665855,0.25951415,0.13983819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025098273,0.0000147292285,0.0021374517,0.0003713537,0.0000032257751,0.0001647868,0.008812378,0.000069369664,0.00010246796,0.03784567,0.9504698,0.000006179502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071259174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01661554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014048825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019098496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001279706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046997964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917658788","doi":"10.1017/s002868851800036x","title":"Are There Distigme-Obelos Symbols in Vaticanus?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Testament Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Champlain Regional College","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Bar (unit); Philosophy; History; Literature; Art; Geology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.05508575738152521,"score_gpt":0.34543598940882914,"score_spread":0.2903502320273039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917658788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5176468,0.007762613,0.0043499903,0.044639617,0.0014844595,0.00003280086,0.00013495685,0.0001077396,0.423841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99235195,0.00020910363,0.00046822123,0.00091471226,0.000065691485,0.000013190221,0.000020325095,0.000016124262,0.005940694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972556,0.0015664833,0.00010904286,0.00034597432,0.00044292695,0.00028001732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971328,0.0014866282,0.0005447935,0.00040081562,0.0002993017,0.00013572478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002039609,0.00017025477,0.0002792575,0.0010171952,0.00519667,0.0044105365,0.0007735032,0.0016352728,0.0025493284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00899364,0.0002116019,0.00013312594,0.00094499346,0.017239125,0.0027675615,0.0028755357,0.0031573602,0.00030642736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055352582,0.000022656031,0.0067529813,0.00011309471,0.000011048157,0.00023755287,0.13416982,0.000083550025,0.00058216753,0.8182237,0.0058712256,0.033876814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035683723,0.00015899858,0.057280928,0.0008276369,0.00002921751,0.0006258688,0.12208621,0.00059007684,0.0022610791,0.18429953,0.6317222,0.00008253963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056580836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011613164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056580836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027302294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013488728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019809365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919097049","doi":"10.5204/ijcjsd.v8i1.1051","title":"Institutional Ethnography as a Method of Inquiry for Criminal Justice and Socio-Legal Studies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Criminal justice; Sociology; Hierarchy; Economic Justice; Criminology; Focus (optics); Work (physics); Law; Political science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.0903180419977385,"score_gpt":0.4555581182319616,"score_spread":0.36524007623422305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919097049","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05875081,0.017222647,0.66554713,0.025247427,0.0015355678,0.004352358,0.0017626683,0.0005624925,0.22501892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5172664,0.009933351,0.44039306,0.003039511,0.00049155316,0.011059454,0.0006084094,0.00037362453,0.016834678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9395836,0.0556193,0.0013139821,0.0011540062,0.0015988334,0.0007304058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.927603,0.060073346,0.0023728828,0.0068986467,0.0021255314,0.00092658645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032830037,0.0006090144,0.0009324694,0.008342655,0.0067636333,0.008565697,0.0017842861,0.0018827377,0.007146973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03632864,0.00072468416,0.0005672178,0.009544355,0.02242233,0.011050305,0.007816921,0.0025754427,0.00058671925],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003338844,0.00006480264,0.003144395,0.00084308104,0.000036146197,0.00034057512,0.21199493,0.0006069955,0.0006417463,0.70537025,0.008767551,0.06815616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000550543,0.00009932946,0.0030375833,0.0029753447,0.000038886326,0.0005064549,0.23815502,0.0015406662,0.000797761,0.32851955,0.42418745,0.0000869184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00769335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013814536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032830037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006621575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008608403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17362392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922818521","doi":"10.1080/10350330.2019.1587841","title":"Exploring legal discourse: a sociosemiotic (re)construction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Semiotics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Political science; Sociology; Discourse analysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06392274028146219,"score_gpt":0.3214130506322328,"score_spread":0.25749031035077063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922818521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104981564,0.016609088,0.22444235,0.09793931,0.0017559187,0.00029729048,0.00035894464,0.00047793036,0.5531376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447391,0.003627595,0.036930468,0.0013706809,0.0003984352,0.00024490454,0.0001787732,0.00035882724,0.0121511305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99039406,0.007525202,0.00026223046,0.0005969477,0.00083703233,0.0003845044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99168503,0.0051340866,0.0005094244,0.00142678,0.00084697234,0.00039782657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009377606,0.00090450834,0.0007768243,0.006832757,0.008047125,0.01754674,0.001928743,0.0037869953,0.006917871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010718039,0.0006348965,0.0007325051,0.004575306,0.0611759,0.027545549,0.011180936,0.004269882,0.00086733245],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073797682,0.000014398868,0.00034256463,0.000071304086,0.000007830307,0.00017038015,0.08789366,0.00012314956,0.0004557588,0.9021182,0.00075975695,0.008035623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011133384,0.000030654013,0.0009838272,0.00030689425,0.000018597122,0.00044797699,0.1354631,0.0009838445,0.0007327938,0.7035027,0.15749452,0.000023878607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046014097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004126999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01754674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059876163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059822435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049594164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2924552973","doi":"10.22215/etd/2018-12852","title":"Imagining Law: Curated Narratives of Sexual Assault in The Ghomeshi Effect","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Mythology; Representation (politics); Sexual assault; Power (physics); Sexual violence; Sociology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Law; Art; Political science; Criminology; Literature; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.014964965250573722,"score_gpt":0.35258952425745455,"score_spread":0.3376245590068808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2924552973","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7091219,0.0019379507,0.0048729023,0.015137319,0.00065060164,0.00011907023,0.00013596263,0.000076324446,0.2679479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98396194,0.00067471067,0.000705466,0.0006514115,0.000071641225,0.000049004902,0.000030481653,0.00005792406,0.013797504],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969035,0.0020587759,0.00004264351,0.0001436513,0.0004083146,0.00044308353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979996,0.0014017106,0.00016128928,0.00015136476,0.000090303896,0.00019563708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029627357,0.000749314,0.00046446818,0.0011976698,0.014825163,0.0070258034,0.0011958446,0.0025719064,0.006287536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00499966,0.00043234558,0.00033003124,0.001034616,0.030563436,0.0065742326,0.008423871,0.0049101706,0.00073650153],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002526188,0.000021661812,0.0002919248,0.00005945083,0.0000027390054,0.0006394399,0.96088946,0.000050684295,0.0005661334,0.03327213,0.0015075727,0.0026735354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001187108,0.000032628213,0.0011014055,0.00020092986,0.000007361662,0.00089903444,0.8863046,0.00013214754,0.00090901484,0.010156052,0.10022247,0.000022417964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006819219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014964276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014825163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041917153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020678933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03041315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2930253639","doi":"10.1353/esc.2003.0030","title":"“Making up Stories”: Law and Imagination in Contemporary Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English studies in Canada","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Obedience; Storytelling; Representation (politics); Harm; Suspect; Aesthetics; History; Literature; Narrative; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.05383502508540302,"score_gpt":0.324958028329286,"score_spread":0.271123003243883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2930253639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10045721,0.024970165,0.002588578,0.2730724,0.000946037,0.0000919687,0.00012617304,0.000082807,0.5976648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481955,0.004406048,0.0006166898,0.012837448,0.00016501908,0.00004040447,0.000027761855,0.000068025925,0.03364318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98441976,0.005546948,0.0002743796,0.0009676222,0.0036800688,0.0051112236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98908,0.0044831336,0.0005551943,0.0003558822,0.0025582607,0.0029675479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087267775,0.0006914213,0.00071326084,0.0029982189,0.091663435,0.036134113,0.0047984514,0.013460137,0.0065430016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012669917,0.00076419435,0.00057610933,0.004797015,0.14603385,0.01234169,0.0122214975,0.017543286,0.0005653336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011925034,0.000027908842,0.00052931404,0.00003443105,0.00000557849,0.000428037,0.44501427,0.00018180793,0.0000875825,0.52091885,0.025363171,0.007397227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010983294,0.000011815289,0.0012673773,0.00032037278,0.000010096094,0.00021060651,0.53288335,0.0005617111,0.00015025523,0.09230754,0.37217554,0.00009031393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97283584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97351867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20652066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20652066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1491129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92032355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2932772481","doi":"","title":"Does being perceived as an athlete with a physical disability affect non-verbal behaviours of abled-bodied individuals?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Physical disability; Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.014894761163855425,"score_gpt":0.3268995993433777,"score_spread":0.3120048381795223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2932772481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989359,0.00015815491,0.000015074397,0.00012512408,0.000009983123,0.000005961286,0.000039652998,7.311373e-7,0.00070938753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993393,0.00015597246,0.000031426953,0.000102662365,0.000011363757,0.000011430647,0.000054815166,8.029845e-7,0.00029222452],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905056,0.00035315152,0.00007831368,0.0001457766,0.00018879761,0.00018336783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942384,0.0016741074,0.0026979405,0.00019364954,0.0003430938,0.00085285876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011067368,0.00024688942,0.0003583804,0.00075353374,0.0006360166,0.0016513215,0.0003326344,0.0010797956,0.0033006023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009345241,0.00026024127,0.0005957303,0.00042144896,0.0007907456,0.0008729284,0.000875766,0.00081195333,0.00049176544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043155096,0.00049691444,0.97586876,0.00012739334,0.00016805422,0.00020651749,0.011280427,0.000038276696,0.00053597434,0.00006544291,0.00026915676,0.010511491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050635717,0.00014333945,0.9941864,0.000019985013,0.000016918686,0.000054247554,0.005379712,0.00002799101,0.000022968172,0.00002301143,0.000114942646,0.0000054022844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008290105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01599179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008290105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004732828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028876335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016483724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2934112569","doi":"10.1177/0067205x19831805","title":"Finding the Foothold: Freedom of Political Association in the Australian <i>Constitution</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of association; Constitution; Corollary; Politics; Law; Political communication; Supreme court; Political freedom; Jurisprudence; Freedom of the press; Political science; Sociology; Association (psychology); Democracy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.033459419538779914,"score_gpt":0.3270030402620783,"score_spread":0.2935436207232984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2934112569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10695703,0.004562066,0.008231281,0.064986266,0.00096542516,0.00018894978,0.00026926267,0.000036546542,0.81380314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95740443,0.0009647618,0.0012821819,0.007364753,0.00041542793,0.00012174996,0.000086523054,0.000017696118,0.03234247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9780568,0.009030219,0.0012757498,0.002244961,0.006411888,0.0029803507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799096,0.012796546,0.0011825082,0.002221723,0.0031430332,0.0007466672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021023996,0.00021734,0.00082660216,0.0027414672,0.008708832,0.012239056,0.0017040304,0.007354517,0.007991453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029383756,0.0006836115,0.00068006193,0.0017980079,0.026026815,0.0057468237,0.0066947406,0.010228669,0.0009076535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009930376,0.000010096564,0.00029066906,0.00003136401,0.0000050189637,0.00011092286,0.002208897,0.00009163088,0.0001238688,0.99192154,0.0025603834,0.0026357109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006363007,0.000095844334,0.01058964,0.000921948,0.00007936066,0.00018867048,0.0032051,0.0010826574,0.0008255399,0.78894323,0.1939055,0.00009886318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07132162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065631665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07132162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010199442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014539199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14181292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2937841008","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12409","title":"<i>The Remnants of the Rechtsstaat: An Ethnography of Nazi Law</i> . By Jens Meierhenrich. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.","year":2019,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Nazism; Ethnography; Citation; Sociology; Law; Media studies; Political science; Anthropology; Politics","score_opus":0.02948576002913879,"score_gpt":0.26647041468545596,"score_spread":0.23698465465631718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2937841008","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15525219,0.44340688,0.0030458677,0.21793562,0.003940439,0.00012414098,0.0009115251,0.00009924753,0.17528412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7550164,0.13450114,0.0014657136,0.018268589,0.0014192744,0.00024851592,0.00049550814,0.00018591306,0.088399045],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804115,0.0014325894,0.000048211597,0.00009146703,0.00023168174,0.00015497432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997743,0.0017932322,0.0001948081,0.00007110195,0.000104436585,0.00009343492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019976594,0.00053914887,0.00034790355,0.0014316754,0.006179692,0.004626401,0.0008129598,0.002697061,0.004496326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050568567,0.00049883465,0.00017420267,0.0032430028,0.008806991,0.010198513,0.0033391104,0.0033763398,0.00070070045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004682834,0.00003343828,0.001904631,0.0005189244,0.000014513537,0.0004083831,0.7140123,0.00005123681,0.00051292515,0.07948267,0.16626935,0.036744773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000570578,0.000026492027,0.0062215505,0.0015461745,0.000009871565,0.0006635766,0.28325862,0.000070260816,0.0002867318,0.011128486,0.6967617,0.000020723532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023773454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065292224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023773454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024900436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022780404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04727018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939006333","doi":"","title":"Methods, Impact, and Reach of the Global Feminist Judgments Projects","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Humanities; Sociology; Politics; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019600777124805253,"score_gpt":0.37828493409939196,"score_spread":0.3586841569745867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939006333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1787163,0.004784095,0.048488345,0.04402026,0.002086567,0.002302691,0.0011381876,0.00021585257,0.71824765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8723502,0.0026990327,0.042126566,0.008308593,0.00079941825,0.0059650103,0.00060186756,0.0010420544,0.06610729],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9365962,0.05064049,0.0009416725,0.0040977146,0.0049544815,0.0027694548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92542934,0.056025915,0.001962199,0.008116325,0.0063205305,0.0021457253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.073050596,0.001043896,0.0007687671,0.0036326593,0.009131261,0.013374723,0.0023875113,0.0023295349,0.023516357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061868124,0.00059119903,0.0004784605,0.004743252,0.02200471,0.009299011,0.020046843,0.005092715,0.0021466357],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018703258,0.0001619044,0.0034583726,0.00054082467,0.000025764171,0.00032739385,0.5975447,0.00027514185,0.0007412902,0.25126135,0.018219763,0.1272564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079440026,0.0001459996,0.0069902292,0.001588724,0.000041157404,0.00014030431,0.399919,0.0003296392,0.002075151,0.08016851,0.50847346,0.000048400372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039587957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010465896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073050596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009252946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008152419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3863331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939664585","doi":"10.7202/1064071ar","title":"Legal Solutions to Street Sexual Harassment in the #MeToo Era","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Harassment; Harm; Criminology; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Sociology","score_opus":0.08621848793127677,"score_gpt":0.40420306797512817,"score_spread":0.3179845800438514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939664585","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048025575,0.01307646,0.0033098608,0.6455726,0.00235937,0.0000619359,0.00003431043,0.00007532536,0.28748447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8497329,0.01370361,0.0026096532,0.06882678,0.0013914393,0.00008870777,0.000050357336,0.00005436681,0.06354216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99484384,0.0017854281,0.00013433046,0.00025065642,0.001137581,0.001848155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932532,0.0021999471,0.0005254734,0.00041463206,0.0018077547,0.0017989442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060582138,0.00034704228,0.00027444918,0.0023472335,0.016687026,0.01192689,0.0022983395,0.0077922954,0.007991306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014680468,0.0002864496,0.00041826026,0.0015675969,0.042798672,0.0074265795,0.009518452,0.007918491,0.0005661802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011575787,0.000052196687,0.0012632641,0.00009416385,0.0000055530213,0.00068912347,0.052796848,0.00012883444,0.0002523464,0.8664348,0.030098068,0.04817316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002065135,0.000038852635,0.0025909666,0.0008463675,0.000014733809,0.00038742324,0.21587424,0.00026575784,0.00031787643,0.18959384,0.59000987,0.000039410243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39955485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5587157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39955485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026716603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06104201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7944584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2939705300","doi":"10.31648/prpc.3743","title":"Inter arma silent Musae? Swoboda wypowiedzi artystycznej naruszającej porządek publiczny","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polski Rocznik Praw Człowieka i Prawa Humanitarnego","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Appeal; Public sphere; Politics; Supreme court; Order (exchange); Feeling; Law; Sociology; Aesthetics; Political science; Psychology; Art; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.01858542874792759,"score_gpt":0.28567415084811965,"score_spread":0.2670887221001921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2939705300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030069565,0.0067914627,0.013956176,0.05513548,0.0015606425,0.00006362052,0.00015985323,0.00021286876,0.8920504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72991914,0.003146446,0.003234301,0.011471663,0.0012237029,0.00016014487,0.00013182532,0.00030968586,0.25040323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693054,0.00107711,0.00012813188,0.0005604025,0.0007030572,0.00060080865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983896,0.00053738116,0.00019836436,0.00042867873,0.00026998966,0.00017607425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029114487,0.00042335957,0.0004355212,0.0013984798,0.005532577,0.011559571,0.0010575479,0.0028403548,0.019788535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054129064,0.00035248027,0.0003833912,0.001281037,0.0139478715,0.010561411,0.0064649233,0.00657597,0.0032117607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016884276,0.000012507973,0.0002119764,0.000036464124,0.0000061370165,0.00009574547,0.0046509826,0.000044574932,0.00025802068,0.9714434,0.011911086,0.011312192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012384698,0.000035360077,0.0018116173,0.00018549422,0.000022390102,0.0002111315,0.0075880704,0.0002898129,0.00082099275,0.23909041,0.74990636,0.000025860958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038167485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005591089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019788535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003627451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024310364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06619924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940299478","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2019.08.03","title":"On the “Mockness” of Mock Juries: Real versus Mock Juries as Conversational Forms","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Jury; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04409818515644518,"score_gpt":0.34340324081046036,"score_spread":0.29930505565401516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940299478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.958593,0.00049090595,0.022678306,0.0007419079,0.000086631386,0.00041664636,0.000112752234,0.000104112136,0.016775733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911522,0.0001276004,0.0069198413,0.00014296047,0.000034925222,0.00044097521,0.00008915006,0.000047574093,0.0010446177],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8866951,0.0966934,0.0036430324,0.0033005122,0.008355697,0.0013123248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6996091,0.25837812,0.019515878,0.011369179,0.00905206,0.0020756512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03502935,0.0005042835,0.0006537156,0.0032979099,0.004577413,0.006601366,0.0010962037,0.0017711738,0.0023581223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26389867,0.00064388686,0.00033441724,0.0013522762,0.010788327,0.006058808,0.008688122,0.0017156058,0.00040528216],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013825167,0.00013700999,0.031731512,0.0010273398,0.00008790828,0.0006235697,0.8482583,0.0014877977,0.013880072,0.039458543,0.0012517023,0.060673743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009727981,0.0013156154,0.13948506,0.0019434025,0.00017681613,0.0030858123,0.7250731,0.009454074,0.01911502,0.052051045,0.04768353,0.00051931915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007029066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011547513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03502935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017652293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018618284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18525511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943592516","doi":"10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0109","title":"Legal Regulatory Bodies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Political science; Public administration; Journalism; Business; Law","score_opus":0.02130900390571224,"score_gpt":0.317418027920526,"score_spread":0.29610902401481376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943592516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00076731964,0.0017094923,0.0048302743,0.01384028,0.0027255453,0.00043040508,0.0013133715,0.0006191861,0.9737641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027938925,0.0037464818,0.011171538,0.034111194,0.0026182884,0.0011797871,0.0034237534,0.0007806641,0.9150294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95007044,0.00958583,0.004785114,0.0050360505,0.026248416,0.004274181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9082879,0.025534999,0.004631185,0.01275615,0.045798797,0.0029909804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026286978,0.00088871183,0.0010176426,0.0064092698,0.008769226,0.016689204,0.005565474,0.014333883,0.1417146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09318191,0.0011123101,0.0012000935,0.005045663,0.0042357086,0.008925276,0.0047515095,0.009606666,0.09958834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016776377,0.000055043623,0.00028928957,0.0002149507,0.000005160064,0.00014451367,0.0009423552,0.00009487014,0.0002583239,0.51919657,0.43932116,0.039460972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060303064,0.0000068407044,0.00013982113,0.0003140367,0.0000043488053,0.00007190644,0.00021437593,0.00006344451,0.00016431179,0.0109358,0.9880691,0.000010022528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01668608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014134721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1417146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074677793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032014754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4740826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943896043","doi":"10.1093/aesthj/ayz012","title":"Artistic Crimes and Misdemeanours","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The British Journal of Aesthetics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Art; Painting; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Visual arts; Aesthetics; Art history; History; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.010469164472977811,"score_gpt":0.2579109605351754,"score_spread":0.24744179606219763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943896043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25590628,0.009720289,0.0048793135,0.08240122,0.0014882896,0.000027431954,0.00006103197,0.000053922045,0.6454622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98655534,0.0005879392,0.00024419522,0.0014353731,0.00014549641,0.000007971675,0.000008289689,0.000014298732,0.0110012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9791949,0.01277411,0.00070139003,0.001351672,0.0045054746,0.0014724182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98203707,0.00956734,0.002774306,0.0027145685,0.0020767003,0.0008300838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007658106,0.00042314452,0.0004542648,0.0025493235,0.009730874,0.010103684,0.0019174351,0.005098592,0.005588987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029554788,0.00029804968,0.00025971132,0.0015939211,0.04820002,0.006765408,0.009939149,0.006106614,0.00052575447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018138833,0.000023620974,0.0017946111,0.000060102022,0.000011094836,0.0004534924,0.099934876,0.00014744523,0.00010908342,0.87594515,0.010849459,0.010652932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014347261,0.000044510663,0.004128358,0.00086469494,0.000014434547,0.0018821433,0.14161074,0.00076390617,0.00102571,0.41368732,0.43590268,0.0000611149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030394443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038127382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010103684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005215433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014651547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040500462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945294469","doi":"10.1017/cls.2019.2","title":"Elaine Craig Putting Trials on Trial: Sexual Assault and the Failure of the Legal Profession. Montreal &amp; Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2018, 227 pp.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Sexual assault; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Media studies; Medicine; Medical emergency; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control","score_opus":0.019565998292286096,"score_gpt":0.26413040536207677,"score_spread":0.24456440706979068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945294469","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037934087,0.5899465,0.00021846854,0.37146246,0.0064831013,0.000018957078,0.00020744835,0.000045283603,0.031238463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027186472,0.73727614,0.00054418494,0.08969372,0.009962595,0.000069503905,0.00022906222,0.00014507258,0.1348932],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977222,0.0008122345,0.00009849272,0.0001447259,0.00090464135,0.00031767014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99095356,0.0045644953,0.00057232846,0.00017050328,0.0022559545,0.001483198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036714259,0.0014113904,0.0008153505,0.0024700721,0.008280807,0.0064780447,0.003245436,0.009883564,0.028879378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013177382,0.0011658303,0.0003436707,0.0034126882,0.0094501795,0.011763576,0.0027162344,0.007124221,0.0057843365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006918889,0.000005697351,0.00009921428,0.00016390368,0.0000025602674,0.000055356155,0.0015423825,0.0000183871,0.000011043213,0.00626039,0.977326,0.014508011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012876772,0.000008344165,0.0028827342,0.0020690013,0.0000088028455,0.00025499403,0.008220122,0.000055068496,0.00006921036,0.009613556,0.97677237,0.0000328813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5914542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7719911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4085458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01688754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040943045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8219036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945926353","doi":"10.1017/cls.2019.4","title":"Nudes are Forever: Judicial Interpretations of Digital Technology’s Impact on “Revenge Porn”","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Harm; Affordance; Political science; Law; Perception; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.010159863904994973,"score_gpt":0.2678046890899127,"score_spread":0.2576448251849177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945926353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59996575,0.0019746558,0.00629638,0.0156191075,0.00024258958,0.00010628151,0.00008898056,0.00004644096,0.37565982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99430346,0.0003232517,0.0003294192,0.0012130162,0.000029258987,0.000014231121,0.000011828454,0.000008187808,0.0037673654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827085,0.0066200295,0.00053344254,0.0011288914,0.0064298897,0.0025791882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775654,0.01454465,0.0020193737,0.0011697498,0.0040203324,0.0006805897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01134386,0.0003332127,0.00034930272,0.0027999084,0.016583905,0.010710877,0.0021102873,0.0036524502,0.0035048905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037806176,0.00041191798,0.00035662536,0.00211022,0.03585573,0.0037932752,0.006192635,0.00640113,0.00021095084],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006312908,0.000043989738,0.007121932,0.00010341559,0.000019925237,0.0021596702,0.26698387,0.0004327377,0.0016842114,0.69931674,0.0069827773,0.01508756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054385866,0.0001208365,0.027213227,0.0009693364,0.00015512045,0.001388023,0.5870754,0.0023091123,0.006832636,0.083251774,0.29038963,0.0002405284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3447939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4097885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6552061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02115056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015133067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68557394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946418190","doi":"","title":"Queer Dispute Resolution","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Legalism (Western philosophy); Subject (documents); Sociology; Queer; Identity (music); Political science; Law; Epistemology; Gender studies; Philosophy; Politics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.0062792191662074375,"score_gpt":0.25946409224002076,"score_spread":0.2531848730738133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946418190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041710124,0.0043601175,0.021760182,0.07158613,0.004151316,0.00031282776,0.0004183785,0.00020866144,0.89303136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25652093,0.0044944924,0.015993286,0.043936048,0.0032054242,0.00078809785,0.00082635833,0.0002728746,0.67396253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98629504,0.005619267,0.0007494671,0.0021264448,0.003482499,0.0017273437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864762,0.008227069,0.0007947475,0.0016199928,0.0020671303,0.0008148694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01622649,0.00072275026,0.0008373357,0.002159137,0.016937979,0.012767389,0.004891207,0.013417513,0.07515002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039579686,0.00046854175,0.0013213167,0.0024249083,0.0108761145,0.008763065,0.0093159955,0.011530422,0.009866873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006884785,0.000010229461,0.00010401888,0.000029373023,0.0000050113767,0.00029912576,0.002180766,0.00012016597,0.000043553035,0.940578,0.048577297,0.008045606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015649344,0.000009782348,0.00014644575,0.00015618802,0.0000090495305,0.00027075113,0.0021527016,0.00047070117,0.00019323008,0.21646957,0.78008616,0.000019837073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02060904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029557541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07515002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012036121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011613283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25140184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946435107","doi":"","title":"Partisan Allegiance and Sentencing Decisions in Legal Cases Involving Sexual Assault","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MacEwan University Student Research Proceedings","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Allegiance; Criminology; Political science; Law; Psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.14140785304504078,"score_gpt":0.4175560008823339,"score_spread":0.27614814783729313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946435107","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903446,0.0001382975,0.00003839559,0.0011247373,0.000013952415,0.000008532602,0.000009692994,8.6373024e-7,0.008320946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893147,0.00006766776,0.000019319417,0.000106768246,0.000015935291,0.00000464631,0.000007646938,9.66063e-7,0.0008455853],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99447024,0.0028842913,0.0002881219,0.00021066387,0.0005461017,0.001600585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96073616,0.029400617,0.0051919688,0.000724539,0.0017230584,0.0022236747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005925416,0.0001408291,0.0004162897,0.0017689142,0.007808142,0.003815884,0.0007746325,0.0024618628,0.009312595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061144076,0.00042229224,0.00032305435,0.0011997272,0.0029676673,0.001970585,0.0026693565,0.003714689,0.0005365167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043808166,0.0050267642,0.67157257,0.00021924355,0.00040242734,0.00854426,0.13360581,0.0038313174,0.0022939057,0.08799716,0.013000934,0.06912477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012496946,0.0006753073,0.825645,0.00017089512,0.0002128358,0.0017432041,0.1245557,0.0037023854,0.0009849381,0.03534353,0.006726601,0.00011462921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0221257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0994971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0221257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028436033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025135283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04399383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946435416","doi":"","title":"R. v. Labaye: The Fogginess of 'Increased' Causality in Obscenity Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Causality (physics); Law; Political science; Economics; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.008598921276552492,"score_gpt":0.28045685341176696,"score_spread":0.2718579321352145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946435416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07772988,0.017389165,0.022696454,0.37768456,0.0009547471,0.000070189104,0.00025563675,0.00015447635,0.5030649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9557196,0.0037369179,0.002307853,0.027313424,0.0005556946,0.00002537994,0.000040366718,0.00007671911,0.010224182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921848,0.0027557216,0.00025048238,0.0011816457,0.0025655949,0.0010618084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9737821,0.02025399,0.0013699484,0.0017658096,0.002343109,0.00048500704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010609955,0.00033664377,0.00048801038,0.002266648,0.007183238,0.01130784,0.0021704033,0.0073585873,0.0044361125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043348555,0.00047718428,0.00045053562,0.0015807645,0.05699841,0.009461117,0.0043148496,0.012861084,0.00042104116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069276093,0.000002044133,0.0005197536,0.000021781847,0.0000037079687,0.00011211174,0.0030360708,0.000060623537,0.000059797487,0.9891621,0.003301528,0.0037135766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025835841,0.000011069613,0.0021818138,0.0003038653,0.000026424012,0.00027331256,0.0027908683,0.00046539033,0.0007018568,0.90783256,0.08534361,0.00004347751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22785585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20678656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22785585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018229717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01385121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4530592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946702792","doi":"10.5931/djim.v15i0.8981","title":"The Right to be Forgotten: The Potential Effects on Canadian","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Right to be forgotten; Vagueness; New Right; Right to know; Political science; Law; Right to privacy; Federal court; The Right to Privacy; Freedom of information; Data Protection Act 1998; Politics; Human rights; Supreme court","score_opus":0.006053000103896562,"score_gpt":0.2707014513681503,"score_spread":0.26464845126425374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946702792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15187737,0.009519092,0.0023857327,0.31559813,0.0009396755,0.000109906985,0.0010609842,0.000112021284,0.5183971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8739234,0.008841375,0.001991933,0.047547296,0.00020286602,0.00005533775,0.00033234555,0.00014691397,0.06695869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97476315,0.003963657,0.000573153,0.0020887451,0.0112696765,0.007341765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95591354,0.014571227,0.0023343551,0.0033092445,0.017722268,0.0061492743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01403504,0.00044993218,0.00077977247,0.0047201114,0.054437827,0.022189718,0.0044839615,0.006716796,0.02311233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04986985,0.0007434276,0.0010925486,0.008303075,0.028916342,0.0099768555,0.012027896,0.010949472,0.00094295014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001417975,0.00007709367,0.013858472,0.00027443503,0.00004764129,0.0011878692,0.1303419,0.0003913941,0.0005162359,0.69379586,0.08893323,0.07043418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000388917,0.000042779604,0.02349094,0.0017841121,0.00013812694,0.00070072955,0.17771295,0.000613095,0.0010793606,0.06321733,0.73076856,0.00041310137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14423372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14423372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23123981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946843568","doi":"10.1353/jjq.2019.0014","title":"Staging the Trials of Modernism: Testimony and the British Modern Literary Consciousness by Dale Barleben","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"James Joyce quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Modernism (music); Scholarship; Poetics; Subject (documents); Literary criticism; Criticism; Argument (complex analysis); Consciousness; History; Literature; Law; Poetry; Sociology; Philosophy; Art history; Art; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.012201956941741766,"score_gpt":0.2716683489865442,"score_spread":0.25946639204480243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946843568","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002779327,0.74550164,0.00032547017,0.16895992,0.01600202,0.000022656272,0.00006637745,0.000024776087,0.06631786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15451592,0.5932329,0.0011435401,0.05174845,0.025353914,0.00007328292,0.00014404296,0.00016713022,0.17362076],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971776,0.0011676132,0.00012422813,0.00023294777,0.0011014346,0.00019610838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359506,0.0036685509,0.0003491688,0.00018944553,0.0014772019,0.0007205077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024269072,0.00056496036,0.000496452,0.003219162,0.005189083,0.008624305,0.0009679197,0.0034802377,0.0127853295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0114970505,0.00052071054,0.00017799072,0.003050106,0.008687702,0.006724935,0.0034301826,0.0055367057,0.0031371405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003207938,0.000018865636,0.0002520067,0.000644543,0.000007571358,0.00019173668,0.013924067,0.000054516062,0.00016868982,0.053158373,0.8569838,0.07456381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037671896,0.0000070326487,0.00076401065,0.0017232975,0.000003897507,0.00017786952,0.0053239656,0.000025350793,0.000058915324,0.0076228436,0.98427135,0.00001789925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059424784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.097650565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059424784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075430386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006060913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118157804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947447526","doi":"10.1111/capa.12323","title":"Navigating the principle of open court in the digital age: The more things change, the more they stay the same","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Public Administration","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affordance; Independence (probability theory); Digital era; Political science; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; The Internet; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04791185607072833,"score_gpt":0.3441619843376308,"score_spread":0.29625012826690245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947447526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15840943,0.0042528994,0.02850731,0.22229615,0.0005597023,0.000104211096,0.00019013498,0.0000831468,0.585597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829579,0.0010370861,0.0033247166,0.004747386,0.000079578356,0.000025388917,0.000023076564,0.00002569949,0.007779158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983146,0.004856113,0.00044368912,0.0016632886,0.0068426845,0.0030481252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977986,0.010072138,0.0019732555,0.001359143,0.0056474255,0.0029621425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011254416,0.00026644435,0.0004249221,0.0028978058,0.028031388,0.0229712,0.0021315394,0.0040504793,0.008685444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023624754,0.00029669757,0.00038926268,0.0031320013,0.08644157,0.011531481,0.008726637,0.0060192496,0.00045122934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012753322,0.000015461688,0.0022087523,0.000047933925,0.000006904319,0.00015630922,0.035834547,0.00039795568,0.00033416192,0.9385887,0.006229187,0.016167408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002719222,0.000036149417,0.011387633,0.00056699186,0.000036529207,0.00025034277,0.11104181,0.0015421134,0.00083865004,0.5540087,0.32012713,0.00013684333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7728732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82655555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22712678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0724128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08903088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5253941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948094227","doi":"","title":"Collection Black Star et Alfredo Jaar, Human Rights Human Wrongs / The Politics of Images, Ryerson Image Centre, Toronto, du 23 janvier au 14 avril 2013","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Human rights; Humanities; Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.005528738763073681,"score_gpt":0.19305832683257879,"score_spread":0.1875295880695051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948094227","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051135593,0.4053245,0.0010948207,0.1560363,0.046124782,0.00023573347,0.016371943,0.00058478065,0.36911356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027025148,0.082117274,0.0010863601,0.004544853,0.007119524,0.00014585818,0.0032924162,0.00046733924,0.87420124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856865,0.00027053815,0.00008210452,0.0001967458,0.00067141006,0.00021053823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975999,0.0005806101,0.00015141729,0.00018781768,0.0011190992,0.00036121934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002273875,0.0010722087,0.00083447143,0.0047814855,0.0076044337,0.0075432598,0.00111048,0.002380846,0.081590064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005445922,0.0006892853,0.0003538489,0.006394713,0.002479823,0.0027284033,0.0019378333,0.0030359537,0.012316432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007639167,0.000002689134,0.00007150172,0.00007322247,0.0000012316908,0.000014046263,0.0006430959,0.000012650109,0.000027063188,0.005278385,0.9870411,0.0068272855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028438735,0.00000232366,0.0016117374,0.00013033296,0.0000024444635,0.000025964078,0.0010241212,0.000011290243,0.00006709081,0.00045847028,0.9966576,0.000005745254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58681417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80836856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41318583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016757214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01594523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8312383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949743265","doi":"","title":"Frogs of the United States & Canada - C. Kenneth Dodd Jr. (2013)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Herpetological Bulletin","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011747292647058524,"score_gpt":0.23197210249136574,"score_spread":0.2202248098443072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949743265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089226715,0.10844691,0.00087486196,0.07322993,0.0036172394,0.000102011836,0.021404166,0.00020884695,0.7028894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4459205,0.035392374,0.0021263529,0.006247717,0.0002530522,0.000043110023,0.004149739,0.00007825156,0.5057889],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998202,0.000018023715,0.0000042953498,0.000025428886,0.000078584155,0.000053580494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996954,0.000017422004,0.000019986392,0.000011559429,0.00018151168,0.000074074625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028854923,0.00022944108,0.00018677846,0.0013910625,0.006009301,0.0016651185,0.0004933806,0.0005106421,0.023989707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006894322,0.00014118204,0.00012773945,0.0023162356,0.0011673172,0.00050115254,0.0006834942,0.0009175813,0.0015230428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033553242,0.00001720385,0.027554516,0.00011897462,0.000019781202,0.0003456351,0.0049449783,0.00013047081,0.00031217266,0.025216125,0.79839694,0.14290977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003888823,0.000008353882,0.09246612,0.00024104216,0.000010279214,0.0002499858,0.009068356,0.00004835762,0.00016207935,0.0013704514,0.89635587,0.000015221393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96291584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037084162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008524069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013625968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08025354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950209929","doi":"","title":"Norma jurídica como fenômeno linguístico: aportes a uma definição pragmático-operacional (Legal Norm as a Linguistic Phenomenon: A Pragmatic-Semiotic Perspective)","year":2017,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Law; Portuguese; Phenomenon; Political science; Sociology; Humanities; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.01537681852538801,"score_gpt":0.3162969994717186,"score_spread":0.30092018094633055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950209929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12072075,0.0042569926,0.12381847,0.02038577,0.00055338355,0.00018055995,0.00028013557,0.00021292656,0.7295909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97684187,0.00090949994,0.0077422443,0.0004565696,0.00015443923,0.00009104801,0.000066110595,0.00014116701,0.013597155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99351186,0.0041353,0.00027847674,0.00068900234,0.0010168757,0.00036855607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99294746,0.0041374182,0.0007061301,0.0007746615,0.0011101139,0.00032415407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060799476,0.00056004873,0.0006508993,0.002177132,0.005859714,0.011643256,0.0011897853,0.0026783873,0.004707463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009224697,0.00053133233,0.0006081594,0.002827606,0.029752577,0.011656773,0.004068528,0.0036370594,0.00050900487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012875038,0.0000077709265,0.00029938744,0.00008114754,0.0000027432332,0.00014994726,0.034516886,0.00011950392,0.00025599904,0.96113265,0.00070326135,0.0027177976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000369849,0.00006719645,0.0050665624,0.00085688144,0.000047590063,0.0010451081,0.10422194,0.0040443223,0.0017118739,0.62724435,0.2555564,0.00010073951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014353346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011986167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014353346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073628766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050400714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053421617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2950262403","doi":"10.1177/0309132519848637","title":"Restructuring legal geography","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Progress in Human Geography","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Dominance (genetics); Holism; Legal formalism; Legal pluralism; Contingency; Legal practice; Legal research; Restructuring; Sociology; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Epistemology; Comparative law; Private law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.009887865516719808,"score_gpt":0.2915901925632833,"score_spread":0.28170232704656345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2950262403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053751677,0.004879391,0.066179626,0.09141561,0.00095775444,0.0001472958,0.00017375278,0.00035134496,0.78214353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94242954,0.0024313617,0.011556355,0.004375525,0.00040015238,0.000117461954,0.00015284219,0.00014151656,0.038395125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566627,0.0020639368,0.00015298573,0.0008426055,0.0006717584,0.00060232636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929408,0.002369232,0.0006666565,0.0017285239,0.001183193,0.001111597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005521674,0.0004004551,0.0005222325,0.002869731,0.0057619456,0.011314235,0.0019013807,0.0029510933,0.016559923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015274053,0.00034398882,0.00047726207,0.00226192,0.03088102,0.014505325,0.012800922,0.003998487,0.0020366441],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017447219,0.00000469344,0.00031074777,0.000016464428,0.0000016530466,0.00005131058,0.0038345156,0.00030147357,0.00005549997,0.9864283,0.0020254124,0.006968264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007075383,0.000016539023,0.00087792,0.00010061581,0.0000051391808,0.000094346455,0.0076599247,0.0005778842,0.00010697146,0.6848362,0.30570891,0.000008403611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015309603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012471222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016559923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010660986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014333924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07735127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951429416","doi":"10.1080/23268743.2019.1590227","title":"The Sexual Representation Collection at the University of Toronto","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Porn Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Faculty of Arts and Sciences; University of Toronto","keywords":"Queer; Representation (politics); Consumption (sociology); Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.03441145545098831,"score_gpt":0.3198737237803832,"score_spread":0.2854622683293949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951429416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012710383,0.008225573,0.0018579516,0.020205965,0.0037865974,0.00040982396,0.055532157,0.0014105197,0.8958609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028715452,0.003440965,0.0019130042,0.00057252176,0.0003725232,0.00012882076,0.007974307,0.0005201634,0.95636225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806684,0.00024206631,0.00008555058,0.00018706362,0.0010927971,0.00032562154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325764,0.00065469963,0.00030637434,0.0009685896,0.0029829824,0.001829764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001950097,0.0005238226,0.0006536738,0.0031170167,0.0091103865,0.006051146,0.00093404506,0.00091932155,0.27174842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057394635,0.00057866174,0.00029975091,0.0054961615,0.0018336262,0.0013603605,0.0025122592,0.0013210393,0.035838276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046573918,0.000012635538,0.0010073661,0.00016568121,0.0000031880988,0.00018368555,0.0023592869,0.000050798702,0.00029154733,0.009104453,0.9461747,0.04060006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039979873,0.0000039794277,0.0035094311,0.00010434557,0.0000018592813,0.00003061339,0.0009727626,0.000037288428,0.00015646582,0.0002617717,0.9949085,0.00000887164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68372697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8801445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31627303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0194095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043314017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.909089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W295295386","doi":"","title":"Sexual Freedom in French Legislation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Sociology; Emancipation; Gender studies; Dignity; Politics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.040518122843167866,"score_gpt":0.3053873912157632,"score_spread":0.26486926837259533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W295295386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051689982,0.044444665,0.0025408233,0.06738036,0.0019132565,0.00011068332,0.000655206,0.00015724509,0.8311078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72253305,0.008464975,0.0016875361,0.02055283,0.0012477613,0.00018677968,0.0003583505,0.00008427543,0.24488433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951814,0.0015869582,0.00023092207,0.00066965766,0.0010418628,0.0012892488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789894,0.0012862306,0.0001713847,0.00015141806,0.00037220484,0.00011981604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042436337,0.00049289246,0.00058678916,0.0020878848,0.008519922,0.0072272704,0.0006756622,0.00592473,0.017457316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004900009,0.00034317648,0.0009457772,0.0017546021,0.007974588,0.0021035653,0.002493324,0.005698494,0.0013662142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014981142,0.000020265385,0.00046254412,0.00006729518,0.000007981352,0.00021601841,0.002797673,0.00016662962,0.00017139547,0.9708953,0.0145898955,0.010590037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000201545,0.000035486995,0.0039366498,0.00025425068,0.00001564854,0.00026504838,0.001074874,0.00027242437,0.00034461057,0.035442106,0.95830446,0.000034259578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2071814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087531865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2071814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023812383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011827079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41195095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953075470","doi":"","title":"'Revenge Porn,' Tort Law, and Changing Socio-Technological Realities: A Commentary on Doe 464533 v ND","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of law and technology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Privacy laws of the United States; Law; Liability; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Information privacy","score_opus":0.021247336249762213,"score_gpt":0.2770433231997037,"score_spread":0.2557959869499415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953075470","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008954685,0.021077681,0.00044230427,0.91977555,0.00310261,0.00002488684,0.00020022737,0.000025631425,0.046396367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24807665,0.018468432,0.00070730207,0.674519,0.0041672224,0.00007646778,0.000087252934,0.00009794696,0.053799808],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878494,0.0028517263,0.0004770405,0.0013050482,0.0045945346,0.0029221969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98916805,0.0073365043,0.00044229062,0.00022389225,0.001958234,0.000870993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007650065,0.00095517386,0.0010762854,0.0015269839,0.02892135,0.012221314,0.0063094655,0.04267585,0.0033221624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015651235,0.00073204556,0.0012722228,0.0028762592,0.05009043,0.006925993,0.0036278523,0.024383537,0.0005289932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037569585,0.000022199545,0.0010327431,0.00027906528,0.000016284695,0.001590073,0.07935365,0.0003123899,0.00033208382,0.41818243,0.49161565,0.0072259093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038613,0.000021925181,0.0031523972,0.0009927682,0.00003935708,0.00033087967,0.05680239,0.0002738384,0.0003050579,0.025126314,0.912777,0.00013937551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9661352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9799398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12583151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12583151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11288324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9129758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953211369","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198833543.003.0003","title":"Deliberation and Political Strategy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Politics; Disadvantaged; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Injustice; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology; Epistemology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028524139371456893,"score_gpt":0.29219203909176716,"score_spread":0.2636678997203103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953211369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042348173,0.0052537196,0.012330033,0.008854199,0.0001671958,0.000025623976,0.000035127858,0.000032915395,0.9690664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73050046,0.0064620283,0.0081028,0.0018574424,0.0003044377,0.00017307512,0.000120028635,0.000109694454,0.25236994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788207,0.0013402336,0.00004314123,0.00022542496,0.00032404563,0.0001849906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984793,0.0010757156,0.00008056403,0.00014125384,0.00013922236,0.00008389095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018706983,0.0004965651,0.0002717872,0.0008440692,0.0023313798,0.007404889,0.00071486825,0.0017115176,0.007593178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002105084,0.00016848238,0.00021458697,0.0011153304,0.0233207,0.0032121942,0.0021384992,0.002272788,0.0013306248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.9804604e-7,0.0000014519343,0.00001914824,0.000009034463,8.104029e-7,0.0000080920245,0.0006122332,0.00016599458,0.00002162756,0.99601185,0.0012710926,0.0018777273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038891717,0.000004478297,0.000074297044,0.000085409825,0.0000013422045,0.000018710463,0.0008433149,0.00039844285,0.000100841804,0.87872386,0.11974246,0.0000028848035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044098264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00433048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007593178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059525166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041180174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04318875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953614593","doi":"10.33392/diam.1246","title":"The Logical Structure of Intentional Anonymity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diametros","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Epistemology; Identification (biology); Logical analysis; Metaphor; Focus (optics); Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Computer security; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.018527657947288237,"score_gpt":0.3052740633278753,"score_spread":0.2867464053805871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953614593","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05564713,0.0023246408,0.67143303,0.030451063,0.00074186904,0.00016473491,0.00039695267,0.00022192718,0.23861869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282394,0.00086382614,0.060268164,0.0017312272,0.00040617606,0.00030936085,0.00014559393,0.000072096904,0.007964134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887444,0.006908069,0.0006226358,0.0014434718,0.0015721561,0.0007092408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887267,0.006918801,0.0011104742,0.0014580475,0.0013493573,0.00043668447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010082445,0.00053916295,0.0004806604,0.0023973237,0.0050106314,0.0072839316,0.0013127107,0.0022227385,0.0038824512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013332636,0.00045783276,0.0011968155,0.0015898386,0.032890894,0.012699286,0.006866109,0.0037607031,0.0005221942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001978483,0.000001743105,0.00003579429,0.0000082358365,0.0000012378998,0.000014531911,0.000442696,0.000071045004,0.000035792556,0.998871,0.00012579001,0.00039011918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006668149,0.0000077320465,0.000053168522,0.000022141247,0.000004978126,0.00005537759,0.00047709866,0.0006238776,0.00022363638,0.9896653,0.008853223,0.0000067740357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015280495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006933358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010082445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004341036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023785308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05332166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953753403","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2019.1635034","title":"Judicial approaches to combating ‘revenge porn’: a multi-jurisdictional perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Commonwealth; Political science; Perspective (graphical); Phenomenon; Intervention (counseling); Scope (computer science); Articulation (sociology); Action (physics); Sociology; Relevance (law); Criminology; Politics; Psychology; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.15603459618061966,"score_gpt":0.3447530701291101,"score_spread":0.18871847394849045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953753403","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100746766,0.03834439,0.097908005,0.32388535,0.0016250776,0.00027838637,0.000039796865,0.00010996212,0.4370623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9535658,0.006577595,0.009829961,0.021950312,0.0006650758,0.00016651284,0.0000114389195,0.000029833987,0.0072033885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.951783,0.027108703,0.0019852442,0.003726887,0.00843775,0.0069583734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520721,0.03448281,0.0037455412,0.0026497375,0.0049966155,0.0020531518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05217251,0.00066651014,0.0012244269,0.005412134,0.02296404,0.02319054,0.0070923343,0.0235545,0.0030767047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042786736,0.0010887791,0.0015266052,0.0030517,0.067456886,0.016511552,0.018269299,0.020041237,0.00030183574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032806106,0.00002102092,0.0003501999,0.000066360306,0.000016232683,0.00047649787,0.011923193,0.00034718378,0.00014954928,0.98138857,0.0007656838,0.0044921767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003140855,0.00019866572,0.0024629955,0.0021666659,0.00016592556,0.0021904693,0.063460425,0.0028981406,0.0010868841,0.7661205,0.15904842,0.00016958393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014048468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021554718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05217251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012133045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023881344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2759179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954115699","doi":"","title":"2017.02.016. МАКГИЛЛ С. АВСОНИЙ НОЧЬЮ. MCGILL S. AUSONIUS AT NIGHT // AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGY. - BALTIMORE, 2014. - VOL. 135, N 1. - P. 123-148","year":2017,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Сер. 7, Литературоведение: Реферативный журнал","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philology; History; Gerontology; Art; Sociology; Medicine; Gender studies; Feminism","score_opus":0.023866977606171343,"score_gpt":0.31228128229724905,"score_spread":0.2884143046910777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954115699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00492321,0.060753435,0.0027436817,0.033838544,0.01427566,0.00021467621,0.014897349,0.0020533514,0.8663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037610706,0.022448076,0.0020515425,0.003100441,0.003755749,0.0002596178,0.005561243,0.00095104356,0.92426157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965084,0.00003958507,0.000027145463,0.000054167656,0.00013277945,0.00009543683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898,0.00019342195,0.00014559375,0.000055846693,0.00025237424,0.00037270898],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084991317,0.00074810244,0.0006489222,0.0010430227,0.0011099576,0.0039810445,0.0012029136,0.0024674889,0.78704625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025407218,0.00039517283,0.00043561085,0.0012559067,0.0007557051,0.0019214144,0.0013593775,0.0018391974,0.6713436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026081663,0.00008283258,0.001379435,0.0007371791,0.000021588541,0.00030486894,0.0003771615,0.000037603964,0.00026963052,0.008531621,0.5657194,0.42227766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006703467,0.00007954113,0.0081687765,0.0013101684,0.000026250676,0.0012619289,0.00058971526,0.0000869869,0.00019297599,0.00774449,0.9804483,0.000023836026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003107405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034668797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78704625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008361903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022017835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30375266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954662719","doi":"","title":"PRISONS OF CULTURE: JUDICIAL CONSTRUCTIONS OF INDIGENOUS RIGHTS IN AUSTRALIA, CANADA, AND NEW ZEALAND","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisprudence; Law; Indigenous rights; Subject (documents); Political science; Limiting; State (computer science); Human rights; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.02362215636242978,"score_gpt":0.2865181886721692,"score_spread":0.26289603230973946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954662719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6504959,0.011335866,0.0030704543,0.046048265,0.00033958076,0.00010485506,0.00007491531,0.000034378503,0.2884958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99308044,0.0011121568,0.0002608627,0.0008664018,0.000019617857,0.000016169066,0.0000059011836,0.000008737994,0.0046298234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932509,0.0019250471,0.00018396812,0.00042324513,0.0023014324,0.001915318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99336594,0.0026613246,0.00071561773,0.00028246318,0.0021119057,0.000862738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046999846,0.0002538077,0.0004935643,0.0024708032,0.02740337,0.011364489,0.0021428699,0.0022192579,0.0020375154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011968927,0.00033433342,0.0002416725,0.0028084458,0.054523833,0.003429312,0.0050165113,0.0048481836,0.00007228825],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014443681,0.00001743138,0.0035289915,0.00008868431,0.000016120222,0.0005736537,0.35574853,0.00026257284,0.0004035344,0.6219825,0.0037022787,0.013661233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003732401,0.000049478454,0.048724316,0.0008063637,0.00009633249,0.00052588683,0.6427222,0.0013776566,0.00073160796,0.10333103,0.20137624,0.00022156746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9744869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9862874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09536637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09536637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11352497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6919347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955266585","doi":"10.20381/ruor-23624","title":"Explorer la moralité canadienne par le biais des plaintes concernant le contenu radio-télédiffusé","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"uO Research (University of Ottawa)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.07211569421270883,"score_gpt":0.3042030977182813,"score_spread":0.23208740350557247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955266585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8504239,0.003984995,0.004447905,0.009218603,0.00016945145,0.00010307452,0.00046432068,0.000027775623,0.13116014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779017,0.0018776756,0.0010927471,0.00069135235,0.00005077042,0.000096855336,0.000119604025,0.000033519264,0.018135669],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913897,0.004094423,0.00018379123,0.0008276721,0.0028347038,0.0006697086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97332674,0.017702391,0.003007999,0.0011844469,0.0039476403,0.0008308195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008683753,0.00032166616,0.00040134136,0.002653505,0.00522235,0.011625589,0.0009316164,0.0011871369,0.013501433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021106228,0.00032780925,0.0003175215,0.0046672975,0.010171928,0.005176704,0.0036080163,0.0022913958,0.000844735],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021024999,0.000120574856,0.091361664,0.0007478717,0.00013332744,0.00055520475,0.704631,0.0002733546,0.0027699505,0.11517275,0.005146706,0.07887737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002227675,0.00008814425,0.15360431,0.0011228792,0.000118249634,0.00031815184,0.65836686,0.0004771679,0.0012980909,0.011483247,0.17300309,0.00009757256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16496001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21221256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012997457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009946533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3279997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955403393","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1360","title":"Justice Suzanne Côté’s Reputation as a Dissenter on the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Unanimity; Economic Justice; Law; Majority opinion; Political science; Reputation; Sociology","score_opus":0.028367765994975907,"score_gpt":0.30968370781091603,"score_spread":0.2813159418159401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955403393","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2117322,0.029448032,0.0006206909,0.46790436,0.004813734,0.00006587523,0.00030498128,0.000056206638,0.28505394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90771854,0.0065226676,0.00029367697,0.02915193,0.00044242523,0.000011471905,0.00003941409,0.00004216217,0.05577766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944074,0.00096268405,0.00009647818,0.0007253001,0.002152325,0.0016557316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98764056,0.0031676623,0.0005384433,0.000266269,0.0051491316,0.0032379727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042126086,0.00022902778,0.00044906195,0.0015357601,0.041049086,0.007719859,0.001146279,0.0032489581,0.004280151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019717727,0.00025880366,0.00018580665,0.0019419296,0.008324162,0.0016328519,0.0017879928,0.005368422,0.00032086033],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000868159,0.000061373925,0.031347007,0.00015992271,0.0000472403,0.002196457,0.04393601,0.00046677492,0.0012503641,0.18684788,0.66135883,0.07224133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012250735,0.000060354025,0.063938975,0.00052528613,0.00004073695,0.000644519,0.05021492,0.00040545387,0.0012571395,0.005330994,0.8773576,0.00021175259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9570649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9875896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05607867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05607867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07358784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40688115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955639230","doi":"","title":"Narratology, Rhetoric, and Transitional Justice: The Function of Narrative in Redressing the Legacy of Mass Atrocities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"YorkSpace (York University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transitional justice; Rhetoric; Narratology; Retributive justice; Restorative justice; Political science; Law; Ideology; Narrative; Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.015527984448999888,"score_gpt":0.25653111628685066,"score_spread":0.24100313183785077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955639230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41188613,0.029346442,0.025125707,0.055950783,0.0016908383,0.00014867156,0.000110511246,0.00017081689,0.4755701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818049,0.0047035636,0.0020893204,0.0011849046,0.0002841672,0.000046435543,0.00003105023,0.00006634998,0.009789209],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941586,0.0048289085,0.00010617425,0.00021017532,0.0003686223,0.00032754694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917311,0.0061320653,0.00081524637,0.0004310932,0.00048685414,0.00040363704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059194164,0.00055751513,0.000342307,0.002046874,0.009327692,0.011765268,0.0010667705,0.0016579326,0.0030610438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01112569,0.00023326458,0.00029295665,0.0014476789,0.030848706,0.010698157,0.0061879177,0.0030373328,0.00040211267],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005329338,0.00003389065,0.001443912,0.00022632748,0.000011109165,0.0004172217,0.5921084,0.00014761311,0.0005487689,0.37559375,0.004062194,0.025353506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026664744,0.00013733252,0.0028005296,0.0013119535,0.000032476237,0.00088059396,0.5850738,0.0004457665,0.0015595659,0.09324082,0.3144322,0.00005829667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030920722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004536995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011765268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038054483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031494834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031305194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955813207","doi":"10.7202/1060151ar","title":"Volume 4 numéro 1","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Captures","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.011683493385674313,"score_gpt":0.2597271697999149,"score_spread":0.24804367641424058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955813207","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001459019,0.01709565,0.0012206034,0.010884032,0.031683814,0.00019710512,0.0012608552,0.000609469,0.93558943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056940056,0.0093602985,0.0006215097,0.0034304177,0.009169314,0.000109334964,0.0014899123,0.0005189586,0.9696063],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974009,0.00046866213,0.00013046226,0.0005281248,0.0011597088,0.00031215788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973667,0.0004841482,0.00017094405,0.0006587731,0.00063863816,0.00068078376],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002016336,0.0014698494,0.0012752449,0.004618832,0.0025451535,0.011104029,0.0022985274,0.003284269,0.68486935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006932057,0.0005496133,0.0013306024,0.003935553,0.002467604,0.0049409126,0.00749803,0.0026274433,0.49774477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050140177,0.00008623154,0.0007256519,0.00047041714,0.000012583061,0.00010564937,0.00021320624,0.000105791136,0.00030338514,0.018414933,0.88718903,0.09232298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005650981,0.000010669786,0.00032688223,0.0003544047,0.0000034413283,0.00012983482,0.00009147182,0.000043537686,0.000048215497,0.001827776,0.9971534,0.000004694189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020217241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036388207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31513065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002900997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030475683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4494956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2957974481","doi":"10.7767/9783205232346.31","title":"The Right to Be Remembered and the Duty to Memorialize","year":2019,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Böhlau Verlag eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Library science; Duty; History; World Wide Web; Media studies; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.020829138067659833,"score_gpt":0.25914793521130286,"score_spread":0.238318797143643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2957974481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029298745,0.03127019,0.0020417871,0.0572451,0.0077370415,0.000030153908,0.00007749694,0.000061589395,0.8986067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11671258,0.011744872,0.0015853294,0.013063517,0.0031461674,0.00009704871,0.000076840995,0.00018066652,0.85339296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973003,0.0012366956,0.00011877946,0.0002577108,0.0004884935,0.00059804687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826247,0.00060328556,0.00011931875,0.00026341624,0.0003751439,0.00037634364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031583507,0.0005681767,0.00058053504,0.0008507095,0.0069103343,0.009382529,0.0009701447,0.005141728,0.023489583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006062945,0.00053989014,0.0002931662,0.00070700195,0.020138768,0.013018836,0.007133094,0.009426538,0.011217624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022979408,0.000016249496,0.000060224575,0.000044709454,0.0000028338338,0.000075181495,0.011739466,0.000022948572,0.00015174165,0.8230924,0.14414309,0.020628158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050913013,0.000009115678,0.00011302167,0.00017652583,0.0000021678386,0.0001251284,0.002598123,0.000015697455,0.00007423107,0.06498282,0.9318872,0.000010850602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053594513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008463147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023489583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033915655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004609255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0785805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962744235","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198788232.013.28","title":"The Meaningful City","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Meaning (existential); Craft; Autonomy; Normative; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Diversity (politics); Public relations; Epistemology; Social science; Law; Political science; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.04006130738555626,"score_gpt":0.3103351869150028,"score_spread":0.27027387952944654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962744235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007689087,0.009380173,0.019824345,0.026860606,0.0011653209,0.000065246095,0.000114254,0.00010188142,0.934799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78572315,0.013159991,0.014682791,0.009235901,0.0012747068,0.000409075,0.00029281736,0.0003535236,0.17486806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966313,0.0018037204,0.00010961688,0.00044973832,0.00057578855,0.0004297937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847597,0.0006161192,0.00010678382,0.00034029482,0.00021696155,0.00024380595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002519143,0.0005824038,0.0005209913,0.0014865976,0.008549009,0.01295853,0.001003457,0.0030760176,0.010818346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035740277,0.00036548093,0.0006372575,0.001519114,0.036312994,0.012794216,0.009489669,0.005174953,0.0021613191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014452149,0.0000019251538,0.000035746514,0.000012291263,6.449946e-7,0.000014240041,0.0016785521,0.000029988116,0.00001604657,0.99328,0.002983741,0.0019454495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004400164,0.000008453082,0.00015957661,0.0001344789,0.0000029630296,0.00009321062,0.0038545115,0.00012946186,0.00007652861,0.55798125,0.43754703,0.000008192546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004153014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054480555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01295853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067267064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063548447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048805952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963370929","doi":"10.22148/16.039","title":"The Carceral Archive: Documentary Records, Narrative Construction, and Predictive Risk Assessment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cultural Analytics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Narrative; Race (biology); Criminology; Sociology; Oral history; Law; Political science; History; Gender studies; Anthropology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.007586517233021723,"score_gpt":0.30242183974918596,"score_spread":0.29483532251616423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963370929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17372304,0.021407014,0.1329932,0.030689947,0.0020022811,0.0027016606,0.14862242,0.007881095,0.47997937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64874333,0.014950758,0.19961281,0.0010054623,0.001234808,0.0018198314,0.06856242,0.002409584,0.061661012],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99291795,0.0034065894,0.00076033256,0.0006052325,0.0021040314,0.0002057136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90881956,0.0391037,0.009358634,0.023550736,0.017237218,0.0019302376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01293697,0.00046889897,0.00033167523,0.02164748,0.0034884268,0.014066319,0.002481455,0.001400527,0.017704178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0910303,0.0004897565,0.00025674806,0.02448234,0.003062801,0.012903687,0.004783249,0.0015365002,0.005428738],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025069717,0.00015442501,0.029540071,0.0011750624,0.0000576538,0.0004176814,0.05138902,0.0011292519,0.00045618115,0.12945636,0.21772227,0.5682513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026178675,0.000045048055,0.018311448,0.002224588,0.000048629427,0.0004027874,0.044915985,0.0036056717,0.0010452259,0.032894026,0.89637405,0.00010635977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030512195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038519427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030512195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029055825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007964688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068418026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963851937","doi":"10.7202/1062170ar","title":"L’influence du théâtre dans la rhétorique des tribunaux canadiens","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006767444324491523,"score_gpt":0.2229300296128526,"score_spread":0.21616258528836108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963851937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05181699,0.016474536,0.0099391565,0.09555967,0.0019375194,0.00004088918,0.000046475085,0.00007693367,0.82410777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9524225,0.002840463,0.0011753149,0.005026287,0.0004330943,0.000034701363,0.000013925564,0.000105426756,0.037948243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97853243,0.015516211,0.00036144548,0.0011052771,0.003044746,0.0014398218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806911,0.014798864,0.00075388164,0.0010744795,0.0018848049,0.0007968996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014243191,0.00061434635,0.00057804823,0.0031938597,0.017057257,0.017355934,0.0017290168,0.006107303,0.0077785305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023572877,0.00044153945,0.00043582098,0.002810105,0.052360293,0.009126699,0.007350397,0.011350407,0.0011169295],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019604176,0.0000079740485,0.00018291349,0.00007242649,0.0000054871766,0.000118721735,0.057803743,0.00008977043,0.00017865091,0.93314815,0.0036235237,0.00474908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003618903,0.000067722875,0.001570474,0.0009532904,0.00003067793,0.0003615107,0.079347774,0.000654582,0.0012408606,0.3346904,0.5809658,0.00008078411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034455985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04012818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.965544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01714458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008851433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124393165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965292234","doi":"","title":"'Reasonable Steps': Amending Section 273.2 to Reflect the Jurisprudence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Mens rea; Section (typography); Jurisprudence; Statutory law; Law; Criminal code; Jury instructions; Political science; Jury; Criminal law; Business","score_opus":0.00968560358261121,"score_gpt":0.2993617323699584,"score_spread":0.28967612878734716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965292234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008088466,0.0028692149,0.032118183,0.21442086,0.025814407,0.001952268,0.0027629093,0.0012900555,0.7106836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14370327,0.0026979125,0.07825602,0.41390315,0.0050502475,0.0025571866,0.0018333088,0.0008502671,0.35114866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94805264,0.007206346,0.0033169887,0.002997733,0.031181507,0.0072446307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683129,0.010803968,0.0010602515,0.0025553291,0.015945954,0.0013215104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027191127,0.00095629983,0.000944678,0.0019512344,0.01012286,0.010309444,0.007269681,0.020009309,0.009737989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055450045,0.0014505155,0.0017749724,0.001635346,0.010816071,0.0038223262,0.003268257,0.017557066,0.0072378153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041071973,0.0000427131,0.00039921596,0.00014851475,0.000010850758,0.00036713577,0.005866122,0.0005082109,0.001191616,0.5008812,0.47626656,0.014276813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048228798,0.00003721967,0.001907537,0.000351287,0.000025340492,0.00014360543,0.001054833,0.00038256144,0.0006733839,0.02731406,0.9679143,0.0001476004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62526894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.71564764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62526894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026409118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09935167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75387585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965458903","doi":"10.1558/genl.35019","title":"‘Well, I saw the picture’","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gender and Language","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Human sexuality; Ideology; Sociology; Gender studies; Normative; Psychology; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.011370243605234512,"score_gpt":0.274189747182124,"score_spread":0.2628195035768895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965458903","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019999685,0.010137044,0.010425331,0.51341045,0.019448875,0.00010212731,0.00047308474,0.0003797763,0.42562366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3771363,0.005405412,0.006033469,0.20913492,0.004238989,0.00016611759,0.0003075759,0.00090114435,0.39667603],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969506,0.0014169597,0.00006404173,0.0005085791,0.0006411282,0.00041858674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974444,0.0007178103,0.00024411589,0.00031119326,0.00076534663,0.000517132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029275336,0.0007554412,0.0004515658,0.0009828128,0.009052941,0.008618257,0.0013588313,0.0049935887,0.048679087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012236733,0.0003668955,0.0006223257,0.0008397363,0.014233381,0.013750867,0.0051684813,0.014805925,0.013958722],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007194257,0.000027909546,0.0018733367,0.00023472683,0.000021830707,0.0013858839,0.17663845,0.00006252977,0.0009185222,0.17959858,0.59635675,0.04280955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008964634,0.000019869723,0.0006110505,0.00022845485,0.000008664155,0.0012014257,0.0903747,0.00006155873,0.00018735656,0.017956404,0.889307,0.00003449567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009649543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01519091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048679087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029568595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021636998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16284776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965552351","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198727682.013.15","title":"The Laws of Comedy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Comedy; Law; Pleasure; Common law; Jurisprudence; Relation (database); Order (exchange); Spectacle; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Art; Literature; Business","score_opus":0.03507574313576642,"score_gpt":0.32441596501492703,"score_spread":0.28934022187916064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965552351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005393035,0.0032984852,0.0022230921,0.018876743,0.000506598,0.000022362598,0.00006850633,0.000049121416,0.96956205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62407845,0.0030800567,0.0018105624,0.015233595,0.0010697728,0.00020555548,0.00011203892,0.00024590382,0.35416406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968792,0.0013736039,0.00008067415,0.00065744686,0.0005846809,0.00042441668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983797,0.000677934,0.00009719614,0.0002896866,0.000356092,0.00019934872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024147022,0.00048344335,0.0004082758,0.0015540393,0.011809069,0.012241754,0.0010785953,0.004129516,0.0253131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008016709,0.0003110841,0.00040903292,0.00082185754,0.028095217,0.008397883,0.0060684127,0.004251263,0.00350559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004890944,0.0000028899037,0.00008341732,0.0000118472035,0.0000012116943,0.00004600753,0.005330121,0.000012304312,0.000022474303,0.9808607,0.011851182,0.0017730771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008047752,0.000011199719,0.00034797922,0.00014005933,0.0000042864526,0.0001546895,0.004787026,0.0000835293,0.00013379756,0.21858828,0.7757299,0.000011281285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01787729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020396216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0253131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076931636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030112194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084680796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965793279","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.013.25","title":"Language and Sexual Violence in the Legal System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Human sexuality; Ideology; Sexual violence; Heterosexuality; Meaning (existential); Gender studies; Order (exchange); Psychology; Criminology; Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Psychotherapist; Politics","score_opus":0.014881885755304684,"score_gpt":0.22032887387897343,"score_spread":0.20544698812366874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965793279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02052522,0.031787902,0.0010768486,0.013129729,0.00034579923,0.000012788795,0.000036839687,0.000020057758,0.9330648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8853915,0.023294205,0.00075391476,0.0026054808,0.00060417695,0.000054114626,0.00006157799,0.000057088775,0.08717806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807227,0.0012119714,0.000042724623,0.00010667876,0.0004287845,0.00013756158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988109,0.00085618324,0.000100577316,0.00004909358,0.00012569875,0.00005756225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010367265,0.00028197034,0.00026257982,0.0018580623,0.004468817,0.0083444,0.000539475,0.0013573471,0.00958467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017852852,0.00014621697,0.00013819041,0.0018995933,0.016323596,0.0032614106,0.002675421,0.0019471082,0.00072140846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003878522,0.000011994156,0.0002391385,0.000076220414,0.000002099037,0.00014121286,0.035380006,0.00009150785,0.00015427858,0.9438834,0.0058918907,0.0141243385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071382356,0.00002510987,0.0015824155,0.0014565542,0.000006921453,0.00038080683,0.04802169,0.00034745084,0.000472361,0.22625189,0.7214233,0.000024398252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009512898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008129198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00958467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005758903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002902883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04178393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969244548","doi":"","title":"Legal Affect in Fulbeck’s A Direction or Preparative to the Study of the Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Law; Witness; Legal profession; Property (philosophy); Subject (documents); Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.00985941351250586,"score_gpt":0.3058573323214072,"score_spread":0.29599791880890136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969244548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010625948,0.101925835,0.0049433815,0.14172965,0.013720791,0.000058863683,0.00006878903,0.00009518785,0.7268315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2947761,0.048753392,0.003559917,0.023503326,0.0064148824,0.00013344121,0.000068263595,0.00014704635,0.62264365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992887,0.00031627718,0.000018808298,0.00007731003,0.0002255282,0.00007333107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885094,0.0007163674,0.00007803689,0.00005670092,0.00016095463,0.00013702028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073507946,0.00033403424,0.0002608934,0.0008371701,0.003727477,0.0054268767,0.00030441675,0.0014160965,0.005411315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031148884,0.00017661677,0.00019732062,0.00052584667,0.006925314,0.0034073747,0.0012243488,0.002952505,0.0012854702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016006712,0.00004018243,0.00029783446,0.0000906389,0.000002189149,0.00017677773,0.013881619,0.00009352554,0.00023059131,0.6288022,0.3133628,0.043005645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021666767,0.000009447974,0.0004604184,0.00022434272,0.000001340276,0.000108962005,0.0025207985,0.0000534343,0.000098850745,0.051661696,0.9448521,0.000006325002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059319185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072892914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059319185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026653975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022593967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019338906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969253199","doi":"10.7202/1062019ar","title":"Du psychologisme au platonisme : l’évolution de Reinach sur les fondements du droit","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.12289941966676089,"score_gpt":0.34189391461964735,"score_spread":0.21899449495288648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969253199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104230925,0.017967077,0.095716685,0.1007498,0.0011298236,0.000059215683,0.0001037973,0.00015688897,0.6798858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9236578,0.005809,0.008251221,0.004889535,0.00048476618,0.00007454648,0.000037412217,0.00016347982,0.056632284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791497,0.0010477408,0.000051786938,0.00039218782,0.00036478543,0.00022857204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971008,0.0017833343,0.00021234002,0.00039116922,0.0003184326,0.00019402713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027111934,0.00046975072,0.00038786084,0.0015558936,0.0037306335,0.0057201628,0.0009051895,0.0032617112,0.0098181255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053265104,0.0003376136,0.00055534625,0.0012856318,0.032955498,0.010250329,0.0043294523,0.006412948,0.0011088987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005628829,0.0000038024211,0.00014697254,0.000011521401,0.0000014566378,0.000022975904,0.0022076683,0.00010091366,0.0000468246,0.99413425,0.00063283276,0.002685154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008162468,0.00001959019,0.0010575926,0.00013023555,0.000007827745,0.000112664326,0.0031272052,0.000783993,0.00038586397,0.9160037,0.0783387,0.00002452221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007316698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007890987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0098181255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006054663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032290954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043929935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970150999","doi":"10.59962/9780774855778","title":"Indigenous Legal Traditions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Geography; Political science; History; Genealogy; Anthropology; Ethnology; Sociology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.017518556773603488,"score_gpt":0.19574031770149394,"score_spread":0.17822176092789047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970150999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033871082,0.00809074,0.00059023243,0.0038660914,0.0004827961,0.000030015812,0.000043939366,0.000033770095,0.9834752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.104348205,0.018772664,0.0018792781,0.003102603,0.00041134396,0.000060091632,0.00011016374,0.00008863394,0.87122697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984413,0.00024391215,0.00005274336,0.00016091041,0.0007073134,0.00039387032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991598,0.00018192465,0.00004720659,0.00009767655,0.00039255948,0.00012084322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000990305,0.00037948077,0.00034723175,0.0015659223,0.01139431,0.004736585,0.0010723926,0.0011465094,0.018953027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002242583,0.00024859153,0.00030208362,0.0018129349,0.008189796,0.003263152,0.0029939148,0.0030880445,0.0029560372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008216615,0.00002086963,0.00040478777,0.00020628722,0.000005898817,0.00039921122,0.059409313,0.000087255765,0.00034071432,0.79627293,0.08297713,0.05986734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013747534,0.0000042398287,0.00061746495,0.00019929848,0.0000039855836,0.00013305458,0.0042553814,0.00003369332,0.00004518991,0.011643751,0.98305744,0.000005171401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22601071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35188904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7739893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009898223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012843213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44939035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970874581","doi":"10.15353/kinema.vi.1070","title":"Bresson and Mimesis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kinema A Journal for Film and Audiovisual Media","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cinematography; Art; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Literature; Art history; Visual arts","score_opus":0.023133565899154676,"score_gpt":0.3296649408110259,"score_spread":0.3065313749118712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970874581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017690366,0.020018121,0.035213526,0.05955544,0.001361023,0.000042642787,0.00006352484,0.00019805005,0.86585736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8800667,0.005482048,0.011745814,0.00912691,0.0016687951,0.0001564955,0.00005150747,0.00026198695,0.09143969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917174,0.005612527,0.00024640435,0.0009374618,0.0009874642,0.0004987659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951567,0.0032553838,0.0002611607,0.0006904238,0.00045125184,0.00018505893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005893873,0.0008155649,0.0007454587,0.0023167855,0.0063396003,0.008290622,0.001648724,0.005938684,0.009151751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011818972,0.00043776215,0.0005882162,0.0016752685,0.04454612,0.015600034,0.005858533,0.006258181,0.0016734296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004068387,0.0000015181345,0.000015238228,0.000008131457,7.560477e-7,0.000014989939,0.0012642408,0.000025441175,0.000016263699,0.9964084,0.0012602719,0.0009807055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010381147,0.000010522827,0.00005280002,0.0000683682,0.0000027224298,0.0001375253,0.0014874939,0.00026434072,0.00013188248,0.9134223,0.08440172,0.000009937003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031111003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015106054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009151751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007031138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001764127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05101472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971143154","doi":"10.15353/kinema.vi.907","title":"Law and Order and the American Criminal Justice System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kinema A Journal for Film and Audiovisual Media","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Amusement; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Order (exchange); Criminal law; Political science; Work (physics); Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.01819319334006277,"score_gpt":0.316606558254652,"score_spread":0.29841336491458925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971143154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28240716,0.008818374,0.0010976135,0.10504644,0.0003958397,0.000018673347,0.00014379347,0.000046065958,0.602026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833868,0.0023273863,0.00014790367,0.0040504513,0.00025296808,0.000012519444,0.000030555897,0.000012218916,0.00977926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871564,0.0006697613,0.000026136266,0.00008163312,0.00023106643,0.00027573892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801755,0.00094309746,0.00031244144,0.00008028707,0.0002733218,0.0003733188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077631185,0.000090220405,0.000093402625,0.002110005,0.006975871,0.0074371044,0.00037921534,0.0017084351,0.007921871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004281966,0.00014023867,0.000092317016,0.002110755,0.014065533,0.0041525234,0.0022821482,0.002461667,0.0003169934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027293318,0.0000691581,0.007958524,0.000056781497,0.0000069076855,0.00016892856,0.09730858,0.00023556185,0.00034648983,0.81619227,0.028720895,0.048908614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028730325,0.000057962945,0.05777004,0.000577868,0.000026000427,0.00017774355,0.13294943,0.0008836133,0.00034708722,0.22053583,0.586579,0.000066660126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07138169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09001469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07138169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062356363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038115436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14193243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971870374","doi":"10.5553/ijrj/258908912019002002002","title":"Listening deeply to public perceptions of Restorative Justice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Restorative Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Active listening; Perception; Economic Justice; Restorative justice; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Communication; Law","score_opus":0.03358027619975269,"score_gpt":0.3592319620071834,"score_spread":0.3256516858074307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971870374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4501407,0.02566892,0.0085339965,0.3984659,0.0030174158,0.00020686208,0.000088441244,0.00018636284,0.113691345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962152,0.0131985685,0.0017063179,0.018470779,0.0008066816,0.00016866237,0.000031340693,0.00009299598,0.0033726988],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9623567,0.025889117,0.00088360294,0.0019772851,0.0051464047,0.0037469359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8765523,0.09306373,0.009573326,0.004415926,0.009609242,0.006785544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04730435,0.000989956,0.0016658963,0.004337223,0.017453635,0.027700739,0.003616754,0.010114373,0.004487733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12087225,0.000957334,0.0006820571,0.003289654,0.056859236,0.023848396,0.018393958,0.015730353,0.0009259008],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023574437,0.00010236031,0.0026331174,0.0003984463,0.000018171731,0.00030476373,0.95471674,0.0000460973,0.00040009926,0.012855364,0.0026323516,0.025868997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046073887,0.000036359106,0.0012956695,0.00091527693,0.000016165814,0.000079756755,0.9668036,0.00003556403,0.00021693535,0.010557468,0.020007368,0.000031125735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017342007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01972507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04730435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011781174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022381881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25017232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974178059","doi":"","title":"Frogs of the United States & Canada - C. Kenneth Dodd Jr. (2013)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Herpetological Bulletin","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.011747292647058524,"score_gpt":0.23197210249136574,"score_spread":0.2202248098443072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974178059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089227,0.108446985,0.000874863,0.07322996,0.0036172366,0.00010201166,0.021404171,0.00020884658,0.70288885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44592106,0.035392374,0.002126353,0.006247714,0.00025305164,0.00004310997,0.004149736,0.00007825146,0.50578827],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998202,0.000018023715,0.0000042953498,0.000025428912,0.000078584155,0.000053580494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996954,0.000017422004,0.000019986412,0.000011559429,0.00018151186,0.0000740747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028854923,0.00022944085,0.00018677846,0.0013910619,0.006009301,0.0016651192,0.0004933806,0.00051064155,0.023989646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006894322,0.00014118191,0.00012773933,0.0023162356,0.0011673177,0.0005011523,0.0006834942,0.0009175813,0.0015230399],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033553264,0.000017203878,0.027554581,0.00011897469,0.000019781273,0.00034563532,0.0049449904,0.00013047102,0.00031217304,0.025216188,0.7983967,0.1429098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003888825,0.000008353879,0.09246642,0.00024104252,0.00001027924,0.00024998598,0.009068379,0.0000483577,0.00016207961,0.0013704543,0.89635557,0.000015221418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96291596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037084043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008524076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01362598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08025336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975919913","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3356","title":"The Law of Deliberative Democracy, by Ron Levy and Graeme Orr","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberative democracy; Conversation; Democracy; Politics; Law; Power (physics); Core (optical fiber); Political science; Law and economics; Political philosophy; Sociology; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.013139340264788461,"score_gpt":0.2822296674976378,"score_spread":0.2690903272328493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975919913","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047940174,0.16756116,0.008478084,0.54170626,0.019327853,0.00006700638,0.00015133007,0.0001639092,0.2577504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2584762,0.10823792,0.011281096,0.17759334,0.024371091,0.0004249244,0.00030904272,0.00034949832,0.4189569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973653,0.0011645805,0.000099887286,0.00034440827,0.00086483714,0.00016100779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812144,0.0012054382,0.00016136929,0.000102048805,0.00028311767,0.00012663653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003024916,0.00069632556,0.00032519392,0.0011213137,0.003061179,0.006356079,0.0007870369,0.0038280115,0.0026870512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008872781,0.0004541765,0.00050535734,0.0012986084,0.011734239,0.008947455,0.0019236294,0.006358944,0.001430047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026164733,0.00001872461,0.00019716819,0.00007764037,0.000008936194,0.00005984428,0.0021132594,0.00056744675,0.00013509687,0.5952804,0.38357624,0.017939137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010848868,0.000012223913,0.000338315,0.00023882835,0.000004131187,0.00006176729,0.0008665313,0.0003593704,0.00009752935,0.17842509,0.8195662,0.000019176778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007848645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007939049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007848645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004467097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045147636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032411218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W297652669","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1739167","title":"The Little Sisters Case, Administrative Censorship and Obscenity Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Law; Political science; Administrative law","score_opus":0.029837285034375657,"score_gpt":0.31697166724126513,"score_spread":0.28713438220688947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W297652669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33029833,0.0037005646,0.0040050116,0.10763057,0.00042737828,0.000028415729,0.00009543668,0.000029161305,0.55378515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757318,0.0005494128,0.00024199017,0.005322723,0.0004261341,0.000020648744,0.000013621953,0.000015772022,0.017677832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977562,0.0009064598,0.000087928805,0.0002921653,0.00041680134,0.0005405169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915714,0.0060624173,0.00083617726,0.000526101,0.00032551988,0.0006783291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004393957,0.00018737014,0.00063591875,0.001375196,0.009201785,0.0077885324,0.0012975897,0.011757586,0.012077072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018827746,0.00041436113,0.00040650563,0.0019362182,0.02084837,0.007199297,0.004698232,0.0076078027,0.0006897565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018317824,0.000019335563,0.0009913857,0.0000111200325,0.00000321526,0.000263553,0.0024578907,0.00004286437,0.000063442414,0.989737,0.004514719,0.0018771267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006835431,0.000032574877,0.0018422289,0.0001260978,0.000022541804,0.0005383915,0.0058284556,0.00053055404,0.0002667885,0.9546601,0.036060065,0.00002390374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008777413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016285641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012077072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028614346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029739214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040401816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980139635","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3354","title":"Victimology: A Canadian Perspective, by Jo-Anne M. Wemmers","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acquittal; Legislation; Law; Criminology; Witness; Economic Justice; Parliament; Political science; Sexual assault; Criminal justice; Victimology; Globe; Sociology; Sexual abuse; Poison control; Politics; Psychology; Suicide prevention; Medicine","score_opus":0.012853894736290842,"score_gpt":0.289185814823523,"score_spread":0.2763319200872322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980139635","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015276981,0.22879069,0.00037993919,0.72455174,0.011521621,0.000030302359,0.00012125984,0.0000274108,0.033049304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10207124,0.45267183,0.002270374,0.34509784,0.010644896,0.00011728619,0.00016659813,0.0002605704,0.08669941],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938154,0.001571678,0.00022400478,0.00066348625,0.0023590913,0.0013662829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989122,0.002543094,0.0003719275,0.0002514119,0.0045835166,0.003128135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010352825,0.0012093397,0.0014060275,0.0051214835,0.043601636,0.015590994,0.0062412852,0.010041546,0.008156148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016765881,0.0009135942,0.00091242767,0.0061559174,0.033907752,0.009564303,0.0052877404,0.013498112,0.0015951215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026918646,0.000038470145,0.0014057852,0.0003408206,0.000020400752,0.00064268,0.025562175,0.00009320289,0.00013130647,0.0905542,0.8573024,0.023881625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069761263,0.00000918534,0.0027546985,0.0011226742,0.000015787668,0.0005900979,0.03467608,0.00006218786,0.000053526623,0.008408069,0.9522437,0.000057036585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9711373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9835413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1005815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1005815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17055093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7297733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980168724","doi":"10.1017/cls.2019.20","title":"The Law of Bad Smells: Making and Adjudicating Offensiveness Claims in Contemporary Local Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Offensive; Complaint; Law; Political science; Trademark; Business; Engineering; Operations research","score_opus":0.021146250350172435,"score_gpt":0.27299330151980433,"score_spread":0.2518470511696319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980168724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34905922,0.0040105735,0.020047892,0.06381842,0.00026566416,0.00018535774,0.00010352213,0.000109679524,0.5623996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98913074,0.0003078382,0.0006396425,0.0012956518,0.000053522985,0.00001792751,0.000007675742,0.000014501589,0.008532501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98513746,0.0068611233,0.00066609523,0.0010159753,0.0038470183,0.0024722633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735816,0.015428149,0.001710186,0.0020222666,0.006125101,0.0011327541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020436551,0.00021592223,0.0005193056,0.0023038622,0.018929642,0.017408604,0.0024584867,0.006626159,0.0038624571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03022487,0.0005491441,0.00029898458,0.0025121684,0.08807761,0.005858361,0.007595058,0.006303946,0.0003839131],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021546111,0.000019706164,0.0027612038,0.00007849668,0.000009536551,0.0005810329,0.10267863,0.00026517553,0.000582592,0.8830597,0.0036344246,0.006307936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000427325,0.00008906192,0.016000064,0.0010983262,0.000089563946,0.00030226706,0.22763617,0.0031626471,0.0020193625,0.5080383,0.24130002,0.00022151861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53084606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6792302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46915394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052121114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024941918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94383377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981441564","doi":"10.1016/j.osnem.2019.100054","title":"From associations to sarcasm: Mining the shift of opinions regarding the Supreme Court on twitter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Online Social Networks and Media","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"Furman University","keywords":"Sarcasm; Supreme court; Social media; Political science; Law; Psychology; Irony; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.030648720970468897,"score_gpt":0.31110552009970494,"score_spread":0.28045679912923605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981441564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98110116,0.0007516729,0.0006732942,0.0012403639,0.00015983434,0.000041522148,0.0074439757,0.000054172346,0.008533932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98685396,0.00041579054,0.0009494042,0.0002759503,0.00030501542,0.00008805346,0.008393971,0.000033814507,0.002684054],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989343,0.00032421848,0.000115619194,0.00020291124,0.0002738428,0.0001490507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920067,0.0045360103,0.0018486828,0.0003398729,0.0007931244,0.0004755972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007486473,0.00032079426,0.00027511697,0.0033757412,0.0008949818,0.0017632943,0.00048594168,0.0010768432,0.0030603048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010726734,0.00015022281,0.00033983772,0.0044322163,0.00049251673,0.0023217062,0.0013787224,0.0009787071,0.002289589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071243674,0.00026311062,0.8392865,0.0005293946,0.00031654615,0.0010500704,0.01565384,0.00075958576,0.00539663,0.0021777812,0.034905646,0.09894843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021840782,0.00018347803,0.8903069,0.00026122638,0.00018728676,0.0010112573,0.043732215,0.009560309,0.0020152975,0.004064637,0.048586357,0.000069135036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003877221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010990892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003877221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039397425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041998428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010237753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982100027","doi":"10.33137/cal.v6i1.32562","title":"Queering Queer Legal Studies: An Unreconstructed Ode to Eve Sedgwick (and Others)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Queer theory; Extant taxon; Sensibility; Field (mathematics); Ode; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Art; Political science; Literature; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.035714484151659634,"score_gpt":0.3698533264607879,"score_spread":0.33413884230912827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982100027","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005446311,0.035227217,0.005097806,0.9096976,0.0075221155,0.000015041482,0.00002738415,0.000027124677,0.03693946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43778592,0.07488312,0.013531062,0.3330866,0.028389273,0.0002899238,0.000060488983,0.00038374867,0.11158981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939405,0.004551619,0.00010643875,0.00041820877,0.0007721523,0.00021114081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828402,0.014300203,0.0005572155,0.00059596234,0.00096412847,0.0007422128],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008410392,0.00046244796,0.0006022095,0.0011356063,0.0071542347,0.010644338,0.0011909164,0.004818644,0.0030216202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018610101,0.0002207465,0.0002619849,0.0009644654,0.045095485,0.019243859,0.0048561012,0.012229195,0.0007097336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008754719,0.00001543667,0.00013238187,0.00005330979,0.0000026411947,0.000059493774,0.016314298,0.000052110536,0.00006755081,0.8887208,0.0850887,0.0094845025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008024542,0.000013527315,0.00017927832,0.0005448289,0.0000036511822,0.00010636283,0.012982391,0.00019846781,0.00020849214,0.4891408,0.49659473,0.000019435467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003687345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063186293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9928458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003965883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004068764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044478953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989859857","doi":"10.35295//osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1097","title":"Replaying the Past: Roles for Emotion in Judicial Invocations of Legislative History, and Precedent","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oñati Socio-legal Series","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Humanities","score_opus":0.018615505550234918,"score_gpt":0.2730423171955684,"score_spread":0.25442681164533343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989859857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75019485,0.008715061,0.020520208,0.029851167,0.00076999335,0.000055564065,0.000089354915,0.00011180289,0.18969208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924325,0.000907542,0.0020133883,0.001340608,0.00013696244,0.000021735823,0.000014807312,0.00004312794,0.0030893646],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948369,0.003603541,0.00010722254,0.00041107112,0.0006721167,0.00036921556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99264646,0.004797657,0.0011726051,0.00040726177,0.00055035396,0.00042574684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004224551,0.0002931472,0.00034537356,0.0008170385,0.0034579374,0.00912302,0.0007995132,0.003352915,0.0021103846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015172696,0.00035028177,0.0004787187,0.00066835416,0.014273022,0.01025479,0.0029058799,0.0042575495,0.00030985096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002475345,0.00006438212,0.00731465,0.00024541747,0.000044441138,0.00083791727,0.7032231,0.0007065893,0.006307126,0.24523664,0.004126413,0.03164584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087837616,0.00036618786,0.045814212,0.00091581984,0.00014963771,0.0015336671,0.6155715,0.0055827745,0.003026444,0.21236612,0.11415074,0.00043505692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020061247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018502603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00912302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018254486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007012392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022341847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990499795","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v52i2.69431","title":"Two Cultures and the Freedom of Speech","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Speech communication; Linguistics; Communication; Speech recognition; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01282562708361209,"score_gpt":0.33797605044602447,"score_spread":0.3251504233624124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990499795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16267827,0.0030218,0.008399091,0.03431506,0.00040403887,0.00003185853,0.00006048143,0.000026696567,0.7910627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928635,0.00026086916,0.0005217097,0.0005287141,0.000072246396,0.000018017832,0.000006497074,0.000010117618,0.0057184263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937178,0.0042541875,0.00022888604,0.00039010312,0.000694534,0.00071444846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877093,0.008128924,0.000889257,0.0014149096,0.00092086516,0.0009368594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067566377,0.00026434468,0.00037165338,0.0013010962,0.005818125,0.011717799,0.0006774608,0.0025628803,0.0068638558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012826653,0.0003002975,0.00040203542,0.0007446961,0.043937974,0.007246891,0.0053665657,0.0044864463,0.00048308223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035026842,0.000014921302,0.00035314646,0.0000091127395,0.0000044917642,0.00006147279,0.008788668,0.000065373635,0.00008858475,0.98756,0.00045821085,0.0025610747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006180093,0.00003345637,0.0015063484,0.000083065774,0.000017210832,0.0001354832,0.015372083,0.00037478993,0.0004267205,0.94978625,0.032171298,0.000031449083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035492426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029196579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011717799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003136007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032580658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035732925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990632543","doi":"10.4000/lisa.10968","title":"Faire obstacle à la vérité et tromper les attentes : Hitchcock et Wilder comme on les connaît peu","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue LISA / LISA e-journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Saint-Boniface","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Hollywood; Surprise; Art history; Sociology","score_opus":0.05593904740628332,"score_gpt":0.31776662641910586,"score_spread":0.26182757901282255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990632543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21466991,0.017078664,0.0040620053,0.093165435,0.0023184593,0.00004201997,0.00004949033,0.000086832966,0.6685272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8742645,0.0043222713,0.00082544563,0.010207514,0.0006142433,0.000030172474,0.000020802703,0.00009121827,0.10962373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790335,0.0012303125,0.000028741144,0.0002807585,0.00030515308,0.00025165806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983943,0.000928626,0.00012176805,0.00009052571,0.0002596943,0.00020511911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016611542,0.00034039837,0.00021297018,0.00070988655,0.011467636,0.011008223,0.00067396346,0.0035278578,0.0072374973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040500313,0.0002700841,0.0001475433,0.0007283075,0.01601881,0.0061670714,0.002929784,0.0038662974,0.00087447814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047535068,0.00003738436,0.002031785,0.00008985231,0.0000103091415,0.0007473108,0.44683507,0.0000485671,0.0007068976,0.47801018,0.043321565,0.028113613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014859532,0.000051786672,0.0046844785,0.00030399702,0.000021717491,0.0006081422,0.24364774,0.00015052647,0.00091545394,0.051315695,0.698243,0.000042528736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046320222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055983182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046320222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050047697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023048434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09210122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990908832","doi":"","title":"Communicative Justice and Reconciliation in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New England journal of public policy","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.03089959121949538,"score_gpt":0.3030150738548842,"score_spread":0.2721154826353888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990908832","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35562882,0.0103052575,0.0019392471,0.22447407,0.001090993,0.00019887197,0.0006120316,0.00012584034,0.4056248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95286816,0.001439266,0.0007417179,0.006205219,0.00007096141,0.000051386512,0.00007022906,0.00004659905,0.038506415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824284,0.0043528103,0.0004477145,0.0011783399,0.0039211474,0.0076716645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721876,0.0076494934,0.001078913,0.0007941,0.010694991,0.00759495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0093322,0.00038237427,0.0010437508,0.0030455552,0.050463334,0.0162055,0.0033873678,0.0073051355,0.017466493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039746013,0.0005833666,0.00071793905,0.006863566,0.013474226,0.004186659,0.0076283035,0.008070385,0.0005751421],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027502928,0.00018166764,0.017889548,0.00018782199,0.00009512021,0.0008250615,0.07428688,0.002423326,0.0001749857,0.7202354,0.11278601,0.070639074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029155848,0.00014347733,0.065757565,0.0007849458,0.00022784167,0.00029785695,0.15308025,0.005367268,0.0007722937,0.12396717,0.64885235,0.00045734816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24116184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24116184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.53229034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8801447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991076690","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198786146.003.0008","title":"Deepening the Conversation between Socio-Legal Theory and Legal Scholarship about Jurisdiction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Legal realism; Jurisdiction; Conversation; Empirical legal studies; Materiality (auditing); Legal formalism; Legal research; Corporate governance; Temporality; Sociology; Epistemology; Jurisprudence; Narrative; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Comparative law; Aesthetics; Black letter law; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02109228815655932,"score_gpt":0.23969992598755113,"score_spread":0.21860763783099182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991076690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033034205,0.031345826,0.045458812,0.21010783,0.0020821416,0.000032708012,0.000053530624,0.00007685647,0.67780805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92801934,0.012064544,0.0086025195,0.009072109,0.0013644069,0.000094324845,0.000047507463,0.00012973775,0.04060558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943916,0.004254138,0.000078136465,0.0002447212,0.00077965466,0.0002517969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916854,0.0070365155,0.00021372346,0.00034698946,0.00040160265,0.00031577062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007295411,0.00036947263,0.0005686984,0.0025124073,0.0054552713,0.010681284,0.0013801792,0.003518012,0.008355857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006070144,0.00028481838,0.00039631384,0.002073281,0.047301345,0.014423172,0.0057684723,0.0061066602,0.0007662256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.447103e-7,0.0000033507251,0.000023667444,0.000013468427,6.421984e-7,0.000016241362,0.0034514165,0.00005987689,0.000019426745,0.99343276,0.0012291303,0.0017492978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002991506,0.000006367429,0.0001215448,0.00027972303,0.0000019263327,0.00003642986,0.010148259,0.00037406062,0.000078047924,0.8428563,0.14608896,0.0000054476386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004322726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006960054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010681284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009389906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005750686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068128884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991090943","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Speech in the Western World: Comparison and Critique","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Free speech; Political science; Kingdom; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.01601061838413211,"score_gpt":0.2319459937975293,"score_spread":0.2159353754133972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991090943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012889837,0.058073316,0.0010263632,0.009345982,0.0011140563,0.000018768227,0.00004318172,0.000017618577,0.9174709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59195787,0.13506101,0.0021432422,0.0053073633,0.0042688404,0.00024097956,0.00037936075,0.00016878478,0.26047257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987877,0.00062547333,0.000042937776,0.00006837471,0.000352753,0.0001226709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999164,0.00057996355,0.000054387972,0.000049007213,0.0001096051,0.000043011834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001357647,0.00050474476,0.0004441299,0.0040964866,0.004133917,0.00816265,0.00048729058,0.0014982775,0.0036636598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018867168,0.00019179616,0.0002127729,0.009100689,0.015335322,0.0042877356,0.0021423388,0.0018655066,0.0005769633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012929388,0.000014715483,0.0002874317,0.00013525655,0.000004562802,0.00012903784,0.023459738,0.00014427786,0.00009466901,0.91871774,0.022549255,0.03445036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060350903,0.000023448863,0.0039347885,0.0011524161,0.000008225973,0.00019075822,0.025447918,0.0002237599,0.00019616856,0.1932464,0.7755529,0.000017111013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014329263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02330692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014329263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050445455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028864257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036600947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993809446","doi":"10.1017/cls.2013.25","title":"Swiffen Amy Law, Ethics and the Biopolitical. New York: Routledge, 2011. 94 p.","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029597328728226117,"score_gpt":0.27150320157824837,"score_spread":0.24190587285002224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993809446","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00072038954,0.8442413,0.0027916676,0.047540512,0.0027968253,0.000029862647,0.00067308097,0.0001490202,0.10105726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038639408,0.6451889,0.0060220053,0.013532695,0.0031416025,0.00027900614,0.00070046337,0.0006411244,0.29185477],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987948,0.00038266412,0.00013470095,0.00013760552,0.00044982228,0.00010042483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666315,0.0020240522,0.00032017092,0.00016120638,0.00066288153,0.00016846145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016565552,0.001999336,0.0010646913,0.0043032905,0.003338509,0.0051075593,0.0016886323,0.004717415,0.032641362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007083381,0.0018923259,0.0006899892,0.0058904067,0.005249356,0.013315528,0.0019704378,0.0051638936,0.012828385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035930025,0.000021389504,0.00030336768,0.0009205123,0.000014336082,0.00020486284,0.0028915624,0.00027457206,0.00016741942,0.105572194,0.79284227,0.09675163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007809275,0.0000067561996,0.00096896075,0.001973555,0.000008634959,0.0001702562,0.0016714812,0.00010927502,0.00012185068,0.054452997,0.94048995,0.000018345456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058334064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15850534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058334064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049411044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008058713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11598903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994013280","doi":"10.1017/s0829320113000082","title":"Marmor Andrei Philosophy of Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011. 184 p.","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.017788365080250376,"score_gpt":0.23002497264288976,"score_spread":0.2122366075626394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994013280","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006503874,0.68207717,0.004524857,0.035407417,0.0029238237,0.000022702177,0.0010602783,0.00025653973,0.2730769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08771043,0.52841765,0.014935996,0.00911379,0.0051870137,0.00029821656,0.0012049649,0.0007014994,0.35243046],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987772,0.00036312029,0.00012319567,0.00019012475,0.00043134516,0.000114908325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992094,0.00035662643,0.00013177743,0.00009887856,0.00013745954,0.000065898996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015048992,0.0019797394,0.0016857313,0.004587083,0.0032548513,0.004505248,0.0013264782,0.0035528855,0.033453118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034594068,0.0015912828,0.0008972385,0.005586176,0.0039255167,0.008987161,0.0017323642,0.0049622618,0.011649469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030537216,0.000022773787,0.00022273418,0.0004201505,0.000020398955,0.00010499266,0.0010294797,0.0003885905,0.00012141718,0.42280766,0.49562407,0.07920729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008085023,0.0000089151545,0.0012285087,0.0008181775,0.00001549085,0.00024287547,0.0004349128,0.00024485975,0.0000804168,0.16470058,0.83219856,0.000018703377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020701872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03767295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033453118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005146809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036042295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11191177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994390491","doi":"10.1353/esc.2017.0035","title":"A Culture of Rights: Law, Literature, and Canada by Benjamin Authers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English studies in Canada","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Human rights; Sociology; Bill of rights; Political science","score_opus":0.011681947891729723,"score_gpt":0.27533614100795767,"score_spread":0.26365419311622795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994390491","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000745788,0.58961517,0.00016912879,0.31190205,0.022339847,0.000026739348,0.00021598848,0.000048565395,0.074936785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056787338,0.65419865,0.0008248282,0.068879224,0.015611755,0.00013588845,0.00036510365,0.00026553194,0.2029317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965738,0.00066753157,0.00013081149,0.0004165916,0.0016135597,0.0005977965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944094,0.0010526846,0.00029918362,0.00014546879,0.002782455,0.0013108231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026529927,0.0014683804,0.001328498,0.0040363213,0.016500652,0.016170818,0.0020563449,0.004910105,0.030398568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069526,0.00066601264,0.00038599808,0.008617524,0.017398955,0.012703382,0.0054815873,0.008247955,0.0060917307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008633871,0.000012125095,0.0001407379,0.00027143574,0.0000030800052,0.00005367392,0.0051477994,0.000035094567,0.00003294497,0.032535125,0.93264955,0.029109787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035402613,0.0000023078192,0.00059638056,0.0015549996,0.000003064846,0.00005364431,0.008479151,0.000019992473,0.000014992204,0.0049736905,0.9842792,0.000019057969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8044409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.830151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19555908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059987288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060809378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43524033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995010571","doi":"10.7202/1065065ar","title":"INTRODUCTION TO DOUGLAS J. OSLER’S \"IMAGES OF LEGAL HUMANISM\"","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surfaces","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Context (archaeology); Law; History; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01082043769828309,"score_gpt":0.27611237595389454,"score_spread":0.2652919382556114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995010571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054025413,0.08326435,0.016264822,0.30244073,0.021166507,0.00008733219,0.00042102468,0.00014981905,0.57080287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27081817,0.12677708,0.020512264,0.11780359,0.028297786,0.0005166514,0.0005210369,0.0006786723,0.43407473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998125,0.00093016436,0.00006666411,0.00014162638,0.0005800222,0.00015655396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651045,0.0024632425,0.00021537495,0.00009632365,0.00048513353,0.00022942226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023786204,0.00095688674,0.0005009713,0.0037617774,0.005190378,0.007266826,0.0009881007,0.0033187903,0.011633355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049313474,0.0002992107,0.0004759897,0.0028375105,0.016776096,0.008379261,0.0031126814,0.007868074,0.0019159738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008523822,0.000010965333,0.000061231854,0.00009225071,0.0000015394302,0.000050477298,0.010714577,0.000052207168,0.00010264102,0.8510726,0.12899403,0.008838931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026574223,0.000008332088,0.00025834976,0.00037342275,0.0000019100014,0.00009756896,0.00634434,0.000074527445,0.000106198364,0.09628477,0.89643353,0.000014320202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015169361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024435077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015169361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067015905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003840637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04862368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995348880","doi":"10.12745/et.21.1.3515","title":"Review: Kevin Curran, &lt;i&gt;Shakespeare’s Legal Ecologies: Law and Distributed Selfhood&lt;/i&gt;.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Early Theatre","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curran; Sociology; Art; Law; Media studies; Aesthetics; Art history; Political science","score_opus":0.013089948042783468,"score_gpt":0.27284718002462244,"score_spread":0.259757231981839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995348880","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003906607,0.9615944,0.00006635572,0.025882762,0.011102705,0.000011256685,0.000053884658,0.0000067801834,0.0012428424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010072397,0.96144867,0.00012802702,0.022040015,0.011352712,0.000035287907,0.00008851502,0.000008788195,0.0038907798],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989498,0.00024498426,0.00012744719,0.00020920589,0.00038755985,0.00008096802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99460715,0.002761825,0.00052713044,0.0001077934,0.0015455594,0.00045058285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020010504,0.0015455914,0.0021705425,0.004127346,0.001218498,0.0039621517,0.0022093672,0.0056480886,0.011080277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00869527,0.00062216975,0.0007145876,0.0060668224,0.0020986083,0.0065662777,0.0024058267,0.005839654,0.0061545926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023933613,0.000009573029,0.00009003417,0.009503643,0.000046955924,0.00009342754,0.0002213374,0.00006538461,0.000070069415,0.0022334075,0.9137322,0.07391002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013169801,0.000013478951,0.00058391114,0.010840505,0.000057327597,0.00032749295,0.00028621216,0.000022463732,0.00004029448,0.0012849097,0.9865106,0.000019648227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010094046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018004365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011080277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029094466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009161308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037067175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995411219","doi":"10.14453/rdr.74","title":"Consent: Objectivity and the Aesthetics of Re-enactment in Locative Audio Journalism about a Sexual Assault Trial","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RadioDoc Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Objectivity (philosophy); Officer; Walk-in; Law; Journalism; Duty; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.034912532345018975,"score_gpt":0.34432437818198025,"score_spread":0.3094118458369613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995411219","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0172204,0.7401651,0.0021248655,0.07214171,0.0031356104,0.00013996735,0.0000444078,0.000036910526,0.16499102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3391582,0.6166535,0.0018896451,0.018983316,0.0033733777,0.00027197905,0.00006294002,0.00010371039,0.019503254],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9792625,0.016138094,0.00067896856,0.00039580377,0.0030015863,0.00052310294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9436376,0.050085835,0.0016421935,0.000857256,0.0032144894,0.0005625854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019153006,0.00028847717,0.00040975274,0.0026080965,0.0025802844,0.00933508,0.0010562793,0.0027042995,0.003785553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032922823,0.00019262913,0.00023366392,0.0026451077,0.020054685,0.0052582803,0.0025395756,0.003391311,0.00067747885],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012736967,0.00009701332,0.0006203265,0.011067839,0.000058876354,0.0005130737,0.09198884,0.00018090868,0.0008367894,0.33171073,0.052218452,0.51057976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039020983,0.00012838368,0.00287813,0.016102007,0.000054752636,0.0005061448,0.04025471,0.000043306296,0.00047610176,0.019356998,0.9201264,0.00003415804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01602378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03142724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019153006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056995642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009430475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101292014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995444582","doi":"10.12745/et.21.1.3512","title":"Review: Derek Dunne, &lt;i&gt;Shakespeare, Revenge Tragedy and Early Modern Law: Vindictive Justice&lt;/i&gt;.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Early Theatre","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy (event); Economic Justice; Law; Art; Philosophy; Political science; Literature","score_opus":0.015333971425187823,"score_gpt":0.27165558882983687,"score_spread":0.25632161740464904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995444582","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000053490352,0.97588784,0.000062772095,0.016412674,0.0064716786,0.000015211025,0.000075436496,0.000006609092,0.0010142335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014199159,0.97139996,0.00012358309,0.015864586,0.008118587,0.000038726936,0.000104511084,0.0000074239933,0.0029227985],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998516,0.00038977977,0.00017988596,0.00027777185,0.00052975904,0.00010675643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922741,0.0043277075,0.0008667574,0.00014825842,0.0018552168,0.00052800967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025883326,0.0013563669,0.0025035215,0.0044921576,0.0012117393,0.0046328856,0.002424153,0.005860294,0.014878926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011801186,0.00057055196,0.0007970823,0.006772355,0.0020022744,0.0055771163,0.0022342158,0.0044483584,0.005123374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004969224,0.00001686992,0.0001926351,0.034230128,0.00014237995,0.00015644389,0.0003605937,0.00014165575,0.00015442556,0.0033968932,0.8442753,0.11688293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029380493,0.000027037837,0.0010006836,0.02666888,0.00017991589,0.00043440855,0.00041902132,0.000039607403,0.00007318996,0.0019442678,0.96915114,0.000032456916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008043309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017515555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014878926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029194287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010247799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049775004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995659873","doi":"10.7202/1065066ar","title":"IMAGES OF LEGAL HUMANISM","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surfaces","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Philology; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Law; Classics; Legal history; History; Philosophy; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.01227666626642299,"score_gpt":0.2831439571076535,"score_spread":0.2708672908412305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995659873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02029044,0.003321329,0.0037144476,0.04342503,0.0007554048,0.000018493454,0.000088627996,0.000073027746,0.92831326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92229575,0.0018704274,0.0017897352,0.005080297,0.0008370843,0.00005198258,0.00008092666,0.00013783325,0.06785594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969035,0.0015310454,0.00005973185,0.00030180564,0.00083619275,0.00036767087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977665,0.0010515321,0.00024662167,0.00028053962,0.000406193,0.00024868682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023816614,0.0003714511,0.00022676817,0.002334545,0.007946324,0.009774202,0.0008317572,0.002887182,0.009891075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060803224,0.00017619558,0.0003030121,0.0014388278,0.04619253,0.0067229,0.0033300505,0.0049188873,0.0013176184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058512546,0.00000497801,0.00006925663,0.000012283362,8.391832e-7,0.000056177538,0.02081784,0.00002568911,0.00006306358,0.97054434,0.006407489,0.0019921425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001542126,0.00001609864,0.00049935415,0.00016687742,0.000004205938,0.0002882468,0.023825638,0.0003636704,0.00025236723,0.40460348,0.56995124,0.000013420293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006324617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00589624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009891075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008867943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004020994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06434178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995915935","doi":"10.3917/riges.444.0107","title":"On a lu pour vous – Comment maîtriser son juge intérieur, de Susan Mackenty Brady","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Gestion","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"INT; Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.015046082964737287,"score_gpt":0.2736867097235487,"score_spread":0.2586406267588114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995915935","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012747594,0.0059826025,0.0008767591,0.9531024,0.0121761765,0.000007923752,0.00003889354,0.00004045831,0.026500048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058889493,0.00636688,0.0019541744,0.6565612,0.00929157,0.000057600602,0.000061688974,0.00035771358,0.26645973],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433124,0.0026902903,0.00017376718,0.00095867226,0.0013353308,0.0005107321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908304,0.003628614,0.0006060674,0.00042486988,0.0029021325,0.0016079765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004971615,0.00068905245,0.0006244266,0.00063001673,0.0124440035,0.013120661,0.0016983164,0.009181479,0.01946935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023705732,0.00043674535,0.0004056401,0.00062092394,0.010598558,0.011420089,0.004431886,0.023586227,0.007155661],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044680117,0.000017551583,0.0007600148,0.00011639215,0.0000105114095,0.00021396099,0.015761869,0.00003488782,0.0005139331,0.12463972,0.8469779,0.010908561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030170906,0.000009802485,0.0004493003,0.00013970812,0.0000035896626,0.00016701045,0.013424047,0.000042384734,0.00025673377,0.012276296,0.97320163,0.000026457168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025395613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056083888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025395613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004010202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054227267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065131485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996125774","doi":"10.5771/0506-7286-2019-3-328","title":"Idealism and Self-Authorship: A Note on Paul Kahn’s Making the Case","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Verfassung in Recht und Übersee","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Politics; Sociology; Law; Idealism; Liberalism; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023016447305020955,"score_gpt":0.3329939664487258,"score_spread":0.30997751914370486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996125774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033733193,0.012807045,0.028331084,0.3992309,0.0036394305,0.000063794396,0.000033110966,0.00006006094,0.52210134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9357133,0.0036199298,0.005718776,0.027174685,0.0014885014,0.00009843255,0.000010134848,0.000062103245,0.026114225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98375905,0.010001003,0.00036936335,0.0012102905,0.0034908142,0.0011693789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98784316,0.00950057,0.00049665547,0.0005937991,0.0010213562,0.000544474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012215098,0.0003180147,0.00054797943,0.0019154195,0.011302442,0.011777339,0.0016755013,0.00662636,0.001968686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016697444,0.00040227003,0.00056432746,0.0014776657,0.07256654,0.0144927325,0.0065473733,0.010795581,0.00042187743],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017324244,0.000004529065,0.000038954036,0.0000049040696,9.79111e-7,0.00003865709,0.0021629073,0.000036689016,0.000009080553,0.9945121,0.0020917456,0.0010976857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006017008,0.000004003584,0.00006767192,0.00004946613,0.0000015838159,0.00008373638,0.0015280179,0.0002033408,0.000075570984,0.9480562,0.049911603,0.000012809661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006671693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065466324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012215098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007275017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064641326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06460035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996386557","doi":"","title":"Evidence-Based Jurisprudence: An Essay for Oxford","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Naturalism; Epistemology; Philosophy of law; Subject (documents); Sociology; Legal positivism; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Comparative law; Computer science","score_opus":0.024037781735511764,"score_gpt":0.3216734692413576,"score_spread":0.29763568750584585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996386557","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014424683,0.7070459,0.0041499287,0.22516602,0.012586556,0.000034969242,0.00010393871,0.000021634907,0.049448494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1796398,0.63990855,0.01815517,0.07818663,0.024157517,0.00045416283,0.0003442797,0.00020638361,0.05894746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917094,0.0042940215,0.0011298333,0.00083138794,0.0016376824,0.0003975915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98152924,0.01473005,0.0008157375,0.00069902133,0.0015294816,0.00069641427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012465388,0.0011668785,0.0014251696,0.0032003757,0.0033223191,0.010168376,0.0014373796,0.0077672037,0.0041354722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016534457,0.00087482017,0.00077931,0.0037542204,0.018318739,0.012387377,0.004118684,0.011893618,0.00093631184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039312366,0.000039566927,0.0002932354,0.0012611316,0.000024089748,0.00018956947,0.00486334,0.00036412265,0.00023055084,0.8276744,0.13039692,0.034623776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030327967,0.00003664005,0.00091576285,0.0069704824,0.000016481546,0.00017299804,0.002017093,0.00025864257,0.00013412078,0.23548935,0.75393045,0.000027718039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004623679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038852163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012909586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012909586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006568903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09366602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996920161","doi":"10.1017/cls.2019.29","title":"Hadley Louise Friedland The Wetiko Legal Principles: Cree and Anishinabek Responses to Violence and Victimization. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2018. 144 pp.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Media studies; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.011105799329611735,"score_gpt":0.23374414685676392,"score_spread":0.2226383475271522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996920161","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005485605,0.5032656,0.00039718382,0.45586923,0.008331105,0.000018575827,0.00028538168,0.000032056963,0.031252313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04422488,0.6382188,0.0012541584,0.077915706,0.00706434,0.00008009554,0.00025846873,0.00014781402,0.2308357],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875116,0.00044523008,0.00006905872,0.00013368895,0.0004482672,0.00015254862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684995,0.0013335814,0.00021768051,0.00010313337,0.0009295698,0.0005661567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025403388,0.0009541261,0.0006201037,0.0022925371,0.004930744,0.004024387,0.0015127778,0.004584937,0.016035886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068546436,0.0008395492,0.00028968265,0.0020441953,0.0076273796,0.007953604,0.00236538,0.0063973772,0.0036140808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007095352,0.0000072927937,0.00016188175,0.00013728903,0.0000035020253,0.00004658914,0.0033901078,0.000017264387,0.000017499324,0.021746596,0.9554059,0.019058967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004225673,0.0000039515144,0.0009982951,0.00096460624,0.0000039277506,0.0001176825,0.005128269,0.000018513127,0.00004485904,0.010732531,0.9819717,0.000011459096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19168374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40263504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80831623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074251667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012742243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38113606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996970491","doi":"10.1017/9781108554336","title":"Challenges to Authority and the Recognition of Rights","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science; Information retrieval; Library science; Data science","score_opus":0.04285910599372341,"score_gpt":0.24582176012892334,"score_spread":0.20296265413519993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996970491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015772734,0.009438081,0.0027770754,0.060804013,0.00088443875,0.000029341132,0.0000142537465,0.00002007156,0.91025984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8132623,0.004967564,0.0012460651,0.0067984695,0.0009179159,0.00010304773,0.000023800321,0.000069335874,0.1726115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99042284,0.004716936,0.00025910532,0.00080712343,0.0025564295,0.0012375284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99598396,0.0023498908,0.00035644733,0.00045974084,0.0005057632,0.00034416193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041320506,0.00041273577,0.00059263315,0.0009743826,0.012478325,0.016730249,0.0013328323,0.00517152,0.004799308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0100643905,0.00033841518,0.00034853563,0.0012671889,0.07634684,0.011620445,0.007483297,0.00833042,0.0009162495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022202594,0.000002578254,0.000039211332,0.000012495911,8.5516945e-7,0.000052759275,0.013337194,0.00005236977,0.000030664934,0.98032975,0.004046136,0.0020938932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006463085,0.000010988364,0.00030220312,0.00020984617,0.0000024913302,0.00015356943,0.01551679,0.00016999169,0.00012854268,0.5539805,0.42950335,0.000015371368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012095946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011793037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016730249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014642189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010530735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106236994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998011070","doi":"10.33137/cal.v6i2.33495","title":"Still Comfortable After All These Years: A Response","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Law; Tone (literature); Sociology; State (computer science); Function (biology); Law and economics; Political science; Literature; Politics; Art","score_opus":0.021709264117363864,"score_gpt":0.3427174305297845,"score_spread":0.32100816641242064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998011070","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018173355,0.0021803773,0.00025824553,0.97775775,0.014164692,0.000011507167,0.000037547157,0.000037140526,0.0037353938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020381717,0.0021388882,0.00042597787,0.9512316,0.007065626,0.00005254752,0.00003106439,0.00014971566,0.01852282],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839776,0.00781331,0.0008166539,0.0018788755,0.0037389195,0.0017746263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96578014,0.019772787,0.0024938253,0.0010523424,0.005723165,0.0051778355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012135274,0.0015386487,0.0011339249,0.0016679912,0.024714762,0.017562274,0.004058141,0.04459727,0.011649502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047221642,0.0009613288,0.0014026199,0.0021728943,0.019011676,0.029649459,0.013351643,0.056979544,0.0037375323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024835717,0.00002173071,0.0005072646,0.00011517799,0.000009091074,0.001040041,0.040500365,0.000040012445,0.00024908953,0.027313417,0.924258,0.0059209615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010536847,0.00002094871,0.00041487883,0.00033163698,0.000005303042,0.0006707159,0.079074614,0.00007257962,0.00015070246,0.0056582456,0.9135322,0.000057666097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011421585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018376771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04459727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009046446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00978993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06563687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998052246","doi":"10.1017/cls.2019.34","title":"Condominium Government and the Right to Live in the City","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Downtown; Government (linguistics); Unit (ring theory); Work (physics); Democracy; Private property; Architecture; Order (exchange); Property (philosophy); Public administration; Business; Political science; Law; Geography; Engineering; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.009876526677921504,"score_gpt":0.24201683782221736,"score_spread":0.23214031114429587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998052246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22424556,0.0027766714,0.0009081236,0.04510567,0.00014296002,0.000025649,0.00005962036,0.000012182745,0.72672355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833566,0.00037474316,0.00008363692,0.0013045184,0.00002022879,0.000005918595,0.000009983044,0.0000036712504,0.014840567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958476,0.0015019226,0.00008984736,0.00024948176,0.0007681414,0.0015428583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996198,0.0011915748,0.00035594671,0.00022752449,0.0008389974,0.0011879887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019377079,0.00012996711,0.0002553962,0.00086678006,0.01732129,0.010986819,0.0008767336,0.0027442283,0.008578844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040915385,0.00018596546,0.00011650267,0.0014435353,0.030075915,0.002099695,0.004951184,0.004026817,0.00039764063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009851089,0.000021975606,0.0048940936,0.000018505667,0.0000029747869,0.00031378987,0.043009844,0.00012944796,0.00010750184,0.93926334,0.005767801,0.0064609493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036330795,0.000037153,0.0251103,0.000741763,0.000019581898,0.0005319053,0.22465742,0.0004889661,0.00041009736,0.20759842,0.54030305,0.000065070744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4978102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69230616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50218976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017360445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019415462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98982525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998090025","doi":"","title":"Les dénonciations publiques d'agressions sexuelles : du mauvais usage de la présomption d’innocence ('Public Denunciation of Sexual Assault: Misunderstanding the Presumption of Innocence')","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Innocence; Ethnology; Sexual assault; Art; Poison control; Political science; Sociology; Law; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.03849923486407813,"score_gpt":0.3372278739732842,"score_spread":0.29872863910920605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998090025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17213865,0.050609376,0.0071387663,0.28223726,0.005977892,0.00006693931,0.00064556877,0.00021166458,0.48097384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9271588,0.008639539,0.0006030142,0.015447789,0.0016173811,0.000038587037,0.00009348868,0.00013167279,0.04626984],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99363744,0.003485594,0.00022631248,0.00055089284,0.0012794811,0.0008201883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927406,0.0042728637,0.0009907612,0.00036007483,0.0013861802,0.000249533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033950165,0.0006762607,0.00040004685,0.0018721644,0.010468251,0.0072781104,0.0010277114,0.0045895944,0.0074648466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010026654,0.00033574234,0.0003200257,0.0015297891,0.017521776,0.0044194334,0.0025315678,0.0062208204,0.0012826376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006388741,0.000016125885,0.0033561892,0.00038969752,0.000022629854,0.0013745672,0.4870623,0.00013287182,0.0007088917,0.41605654,0.06031823,0.030498037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000778204,0.00004240428,0.0071134963,0.0008990428,0.000022606815,0.0014020985,0.1503928,0.00015456957,0.0007797682,0.008186585,0.8309327,0.00006617024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17402472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15231192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17402472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011705773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004946122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3460235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998376606","doi":"10.33137/cal.v6i2.33491","title":"Writings and Their Publics: Law and Literature in the Eighteenth Century","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Scholarship; Expression (computer science); The Renaissance; Diversity (politics); Literature; Publics; History; Law; History of literature; Literary criticism; Sociology; Aesthetics; Classics; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.011675168918361832,"score_gpt":0.28527372984232874,"score_spread":0.2735985609239669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998376606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35346654,0.067019604,0.002272311,0.10693597,0.0017968429,0.000035214547,0.0001573672,0.00007855274,0.46823755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98386866,0.0064584683,0.00020746305,0.0012026499,0.0006393292,0.000016812433,0.000025126488,0.000028706134,0.0075527485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586356,0.0023626368,0.00015660078,0.00031472248,0.0007895373,0.0005129192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904435,0.0061170026,0.0011227038,0.00052334147,0.0010752339,0.00071813195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051317005,0.0003915721,0.00043496146,0.006497587,0.015452203,0.023926234,0.0010910482,0.0033059132,0.003914145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012562753,0.00034745625,0.00022370924,0.0044606337,0.042088594,0.021074204,0.005858289,0.0039367178,0.00035824243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023355133,0.000026882259,0.0008106843,0.000065548644,0.000005055268,0.00028230355,0.39221284,0.0000470411,0.00009275967,0.58966655,0.0048562475,0.011910798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024410438,0.000047927733,0.0031588597,0.0011396654,0.000012398505,0.0004235903,0.2930509,0.00016019851,0.00031887033,0.224331,0.47730014,0.000032065498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004945092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005953092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023926234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011596656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004470771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998558226","doi":"10.1017/cls.2019.30","title":"Elspeth Kaiser-Derrick Implicating the System: Judicial Discourses in the Sentencing of Indigenous Women. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press, 2019. 408 pp.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Content (measure theory); Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Media studies; Biology","score_opus":0.011455293083312432,"score_gpt":0.23274503744198527,"score_spread":0.22128974435867282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998558226","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005199238,0.642506,0.0010200161,0.22663514,0.0043032365,0.000024465999,0.00034537993,0.00007060053,0.11989591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20687844,0.42344084,0.0017392715,0.014397975,0.0011546545,0.00005412539,0.00026874838,0.00015902496,0.3519069],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991974,0.0002913694,0.000032454347,0.00006052224,0.00026839442,0.00014993793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852103,0.00071098615,0.000091296046,0.000036542715,0.0004748903,0.00016523286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018273365,0.0004979605,0.00022391838,0.0011476842,0.0042567006,0.0031289924,0.0010369819,0.0020940206,0.012574245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048473366,0.0004890861,0.00008798578,0.0018593541,0.003749647,0.004720775,0.0011313796,0.0018697236,0.0024636467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027112585,0.000012368816,0.0005915065,0.00047883132,0.00000460839,0.0002969967,0.021381289,0.0000965704,0.00022004812,0.057672743,0.8104614,0.108756594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057317634,0.0000036694448,0.0050389376,0.0011097278,0.00000816964,0.0001244214,0.018962948,0.00005131072,0.00024598322,0.008054332,0.9663816,0.000013139571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6262156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7627014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37378442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01020625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0202162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7519714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998827159","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v9n1p1","title":"Modernising the Law on Oaths &amp; Affirmations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.2827484863598327,"score_gpt":0.48154056246122606,"score_spread":0.19879207610139338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998827159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010108342,0.005783369,0.017688839,0.35252756,0.006418627,0.00010602872,0.00012006827,0.00020522335,0.607042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61933374,0.0042085275,0.015601088,0.18999052,0.007772575,0.0004284512,0.000110617046,0.0003219362,0.16223262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9557368,0.021377625,0.0024276953,0.0042623426,0.0123359095,0.0038596552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.925206,0.049790464,0.0051474595,0.009433936,0.008218694,0.002203319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043469526,0.00075043377,0.0010665212,0.0024509926,0.010544587,0.019080305,0.0040482967,0.02806761,0.0141469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095688015,0.0009893922,0.0012585021,0.0015944906,0.0722838,0.02470835,0.014189818,0.039772235,0.0034239192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037840127,0.000012136146,0.00005805385,0.00002470142,0.000002241808,0.000027598506,0.0020233057,0.000047112542,0.000053124506,0.9856129,0.009158446,0.002976568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016746695,0.000018015533,0.00021017536,0.00035800142,0.000011223189,0.00007361747,0.0017063499,0.00025978326,0.0003300746,0.7582647,0.23870689,0.000044538298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00819741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062221503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043469526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010445919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016794095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2298916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999966569","doi":"10.24908/ss.v17i3/4.13185","title":"Review of Weizman's Forensic Architecture: Violence at the Threshold of Detectability","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surveillance & Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Forensic science; Architecture; Computer security; Criminology; Computer science; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.010572619352561265,"score_gpt":0.26970501235646654,"score_spread":0.2591323930039053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999966569","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009774687,0.9916847,0.00028847405,0.0041263564,0.00069191464,0.000004648913,0.000015264613,0.0000042623165,0.0030866128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022851445,0.9933356,0.00033959307,0.0020417082,0.0012260037,0.000010161233,0.00002560402,0.000007265231,0.0007289404],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998092,0.00073301536,0.0003003463,0.00021296645,0.000566072,0.000095552445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928619,0.0046240836,0.0006088881,0.00016768585,0.001580003,0.00015747552],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035653964,0.0009950066,0.0012487806,0.007957559,0.0013614336,0.0029876886,0.0018738108,0.0025954552,0.0035662686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012503792,0.00059411797,0.0005613153,0.008685559,0.004099898,0.0040452583,0.0017270402,0.0030093503,0.0016528575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045430523,0.000033235683,0.0005415465,0.015687685,0.000119358694,0.00018320204,0.0012325525,0.00058780675,0.0001411825,0.107101135,0.2174677,0.6568591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003642235,0.000022547929,0.0013250657,0.022225471,0.000057025565,0.0006009711,0.00033839964,0.00009788146,0.000102038546,0.020532968,0.9546654,0.000028523675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010881384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015323354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056032785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007299388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040654838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000124880","doi":"","title":"Law's Expression: Communication, Law and Media in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expression (computer science); Democracy; Freedom of expression; Politics; Dimension (graph theory); Political science; Freedom of the press; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Human rights; Computer science","score_opus":0.01357994098093837,"score_gpt":0.24901711932480447,"score_spread":0.2354371783438661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000124880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021876879,0.024358662,0.0018683997,0.060519,0.0011766827,0.000089220055,0.0005230284,0.00014514281,0.8894431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4893042,0.029592374,0.0025061832,0.009054605,0.00026967155,0.000104973275,0.00035850884,0.00017345732,0.468636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563664,0.00035119857,0.00006788795,0.00028447996,0.0023458106,0.0013140496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982128,0.00040868737,0.00008853529,0.00006777369,0.00080119685,0.00042106796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001323018,0.00080686784,0.00046618565,0.002897912,0.030580558,0.018201597,0.0024172661,0.0034000103,0.012643341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045071174,0.00043910585,0.0003680696,0.007523762,0.019344443,0.0043081623,0.004570258,0.00392162,0.0009873036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017860339,0.000019044786,0.0010669646,0.00014813952,0.0000064497117,0.00039601338,0.04048211,0.000337928,0.00021468195,0.7609646,0.14018789,0.056158327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063740704,0.0000063977786,0.003179869,0.0002672725,0.000012433397,0.000154333,0.026009519,0.00047320753,0.00024985033,0.02223347,0.9473534,0.00005381511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9963406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99771214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20486759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20486759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3472475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9222409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001695852","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190695620.013.22","title":"Spacetime in/and Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Temporalities; Temporality; Spacetime; Construct (python library); Discipline; Space (punctuation); Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.023741545727129772,"score_gpt":0.21854071321281457,"score_spread":0.1947991674856848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001695852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054426016,0.025513092,0.0082444865,0.01460491,0.0005473153,0.000011662036,0.00006730298,0.00006874322,0.94549984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7041919,0.03371323,0.007517617,0.0047890544,0.0015751675,0.00007840626,0.00017919851,0.0001787711,0.24777663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991731,0.00043267038,0.00002856959,0.00012217162,0.00016876818,0.00007465311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925226,0.00040940958,0.00005939753,0.00009811104,0.00011188274,0.000068951915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012051315,0.00047952685,0.00031729153,0.0014154305,0.0027036965,0.005868189,0.00061373855,0.001429348,0.013384901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017996836,0.00022435495,0.0003035754,0.0012524626,0.020870944,0.006026117,0.0022208737,0.0027479972,0.0014208637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.7390024e-7,6.3361665e-7,0.000012208677,0.0000074521467,2.761888e-7,0.0000072131966,0.00042551616,0.00003306058,0.000012183669,0.9966377,0.0015623796,0.0013006012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027649353,0.0000049203227,0.00012511162,0.00011066742,0.0000017914114,0.00005870981,0.00087659515,0.00018969463,0.00006211308,0.79231477,0.20624866,0.0000041108324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006546276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004830872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013384901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051806467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022028761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044776976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003174753","doi":"10.21747/21833745/lanlaw/6_2a3","title":"“A bridge that will probably never be crossed”: The discourse of accountability in Judge Persky’s sentencing decision of Brock Turner in The People v. Turner (2016)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Law=Linguagem e Direito","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Turner's syndrome; Bridge (graph theory); Accountability; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Law; Turner syndrome; Internal medicine; Medicine","score_opus":0.01481628505289999,"score_gpt":0.30944895858318505,"score_spread":0.29463267353028505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003174753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5173307,0.0043081455,0.011003169,0.19447353,0.0017985564,0.000081737555,0.00006845424,0.00011102226,0.27082473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99220884,0.00020860565,0.000360117,0.0033978482,0.000096973636,0.000018311406,0.0000058737405,0.000021379008,0.0036821314],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97743374,0.016866205,0.0004794047,0.0011903332,0.0026859308,0.0013445057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98561746,0.011609196,0.00092452083,0.00031413764,0.001100158,0.00043447324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011293254,0.00053431815,0.0004457405,0.0013658063,0.021623282,0.010195297,0.0015785444,0.008487386,0.0015609493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030788638,0.00041130898,0.00029585778,0.000664516,0.036772404,0.008486824,0.00621597,0.010030366,0.00021819171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024145249,0.000014841222,0.000561467,0.00006762468,0.0000057671614,0.0010518173,0.6130796,0.00010470689,0.00047969384,0.3711481,0.008230264,0.0052318857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023648454,0.00007664145,0.0028926346,0.0007884679,0.00003819574,0.0008365284,0.6159807,0.000983538,0.0027639775,0.1009112,0.27457795,0.0001265309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02490175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023821795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02490175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0116496235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069819624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08452433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005497808","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v31i3.5939","title":"\"We are all Here to Stay\"; Addressing Aboriginal Title Claims after Delgamuukw v British Columbia","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Project commissioning; Publishing; Political science; Media studies; Library science; Management; Sociology; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.017449960063808702,"score_gpt":0.27018260702404273,"score_spread":0.252732646960234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005497808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2311289,0.055853937,0.0014480056,0.14532405,0.0017273581,0.00031380757,0.0005539422,0.00008350556,0.56356645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78415495,0.012906267,0.0008606964,0.055309568,0.00032128152,0.00011913974,0.00014656928,0.000049382033,0.14613226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99437547,0.00093280314,0.00014273642,0.00039855813,0.0021145302,0.0020359755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954738,0.0021478937,0.00018010713,0.000118288604,0.0016569548,0.00042281713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030698557,0.0003304774,0.00037882873,0.002106524,0.028682431,0.009175343,0.0026877923,0.010312923,0.003324399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011822403,0.00046237386,0.00033621848,0.0026478171,0.0073129823,0.0020005943,0.0027757133,0.005983988,0.00025235993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011554977,0.00008177008,0.017959302,0.0008509249,0.00008897806,0.008997953,0.089966655,0.0011512251,0.0027159406,0.61430216,0.21031125,0.05345819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008642759,0.00010253542,0.060174342,0.0017095383,0.00025828977,0.00084652903,0.08599886,0.0011352078,0.00234775,0.03685084,0.81016964,0.000320124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99555427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06503066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06503066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.115851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47183263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006249729","doi":"10.14453/ltc.657","title":"‘You people talk from paper’: Indigenous law, western legalism, and the cultural variability of law’s materials","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law/text/culture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legalism (Western philosophy); Indigenous; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.008044760885683906,"score_gpt":0.2546704622676375,"score_spread":0.2466257013819536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006249729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34557995,0.004266219,0.0013729855,0.046477787,0.00020484462,0.000037870082,0.00008842952,0.00005580819,0.6019161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96962476,0.00081741926,0.00026776228,0.0031119895,0.00004058389,0.000015951859,0.000021991302,0.000032889948,0.026066644],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656445,0.0014058761,0.00006847281,0.00025196237,0.000899983,0.0008093241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962568,0.0020031524,0.0003098535,0.00024267437,0.000658835,0.00052869855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002799831,0.00022855462,0.00019481592,0.0017216605,0.022725508,0.011786032,0.0012542121,0.001923062,0.0054616234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006614196,0.0003460264,0.000099699406,0.0021341597,0.039478876,0.003955439,0.003177453,0.0029895569,0.00045541336],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023161385,0.000028594111,0.0048316987,0.00006657771,0.0000067933097,0.001064083,0.6829399,0.000075505915,0.00041270876,0.26941535,0.015788492,0.025347171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000113939495,0.000022422208,0.02161311,0.00050921255,0.000019318279,0.0005494107,0.6467239,0.00016950183,0.0006480435,0.031436566,0.29822257,0.00007456193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8533106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92086035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8533106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030016689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021000879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29510653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007157874","doi":"10.14453/ltc.659","title":"A Rhetorical Matter of Life and Law: The Speculative Futures of (Bio)political Reproduction","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law/text/culture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reproduction; Futures contract; Rhetorical question; Politics; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Economics; Art; Biology; Literature; Ecology; Financial economics","score_opus":0.015546029935231,"score_gpt":0.28332138541448826,"score_spread":0.26777535547925724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007157874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07066533,0.017087923,0.03975774,0.18026112,0.0031221686,0.00005154812,0.000053034815,0.00013124866,0.68886983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9583235,0.0025234504,0.0033265946,0.0074400986,0.0015815283,0.0000679658,0.00001791961,0.0001287078,0.026590165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948447,0.0036831337,0.00007347299,0.00034208037,0.0008180745,0.00023849925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917401,0.0068533607,0.00039988014,0.00042310279,0.00036381802,0.0002198482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046560294,0.00035667996,0.00030276607,0.0016527073,0.0063066804,0.009659925,0.0010822064,0.0031300827,0.004154312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113266045,0.00025608847,0.00023250032,0.0009843118,0.05913652,0.010771106,0.0035139685,0.004922613,0.0007555035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029016421,0.0000037412203,0.000042204654,0.000015853697,8.167794e-7,0.000052527295,0.017000027,0.000035505935,0.0000767166,0.9787064,0.0017962646,0.002267135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000134242455,0.00002601879,0.00024855247,0.00026352334,0.000006012713,0.00020561722,0.020937394,0.0003773167,0.0007286465,0.55312777,0.42404938,0.000016328482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014771165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013483642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009659925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048882347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022286314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03546679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007472026","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.31.2.10","title":"Patricia Cochran, <i>Common Sense and Legal Judgment: Community Knowledge, Political Power, and Rhetorical Practice</i>","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Common sense; Politics; Power (physics); Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.019411038484253018,"score_gpt":0.29228229032161884,"score_spread":0.2728712518373658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007472026","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001803299,0.26362222,0.0020390737,0.67957085,0.008724309,0.00008031896,0.00016242664,0.00006244167,0.043934975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18876286,0.38676488,0.005634661,0.3209974,0.028542412,0.0006464959,0.0002975704,0.00034639845,0.06800739],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938139,0.0026410704,0.00019950708,0.0006416317,0.0022796826,0.0004242761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97932,0.013739848,0.0010819038,0.0003387169,0.004906764,0.0006128629],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052620075,0.0010926286,0.0007147783,0.004884882,0.009795385,0.009216644,0.0028896334,0.005091722,0.004844122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026306162,0.0006338596,0.00043761736,0.0076967687,0.012420211,0.010726527,0.0037462784,0.0073174774,0.0014090295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009710684,0.000010850648,0.00033672783,0.00046426154,0.000009677393,0.00012584854,0.007143857,0.00007168699,0.000059228496,0.08133364,0.8875376,0.022896802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009230015,0.000011726699,0.002465466,0.0012968853,0.000011187186,0.00030440115,0.0067251436,0.00015069383,0.00021163479,0.024298642,0.96446455,0.00005046552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1517999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22684652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1517999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010810415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01413106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30183268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007814168","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i1.6160","title":"Review of Truth in Fiction: Rethinking its Logic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Fiction theory; Philosophical logic; Non-fiction; Philosophy; Sociology; Aesthetics; Literary fiction; Literature; Art; Linguistics; Literary criticism","score_opus":0.08173305572992969,"score_gpt":0.32263427061565514,"score_spread":0.24090121488572547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007814168","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028797311,0.6508504,0.011627596,0.24134925,0.018179372,0.00003069062,0.00010992262,0.000088652996,0.07488434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25597084,0.5400419,0.010047955,0.09683842,0.06903135,0.00015073727,0.0003471627,0.0006149162,0.026956744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898874,0.005460434,0.00058902154,0.0007307374,0.0029408303,0.00039156547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93756044,0.052115727,0.0012424287,0.002006901,0.0065589226,0.00051572284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010385633,0.0006827072,0.001203341,0.008428434,0.003289821,0.008975307,0.0021842457,0.005504691,0.0051933406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04371877,0.00042735413,0.0005848539,0.0047546495,0.02307536,0.014831712,0.0033923457,0.0069274306,0.0016151521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022429509,0.00000914733,0.00015324615,0.0018233827,0.000031806092,0.00010885315,0.005790605,0.00024218118,0.00016066448,0.78323287,0.10802916,0.100395694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067465944,0.000019471066,0.00033458226,0.0037196463,0.000019800811,0.00019235075,0.0015065093,0.0001720184,0.00026057492,0.17229144,0.8214523,0.000024527595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046673706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060520982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010385633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006355787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004310994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054925144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008263108","doi":"10.7202/1067517ar","title":"🗨, 📖, ⚖ : que pensent les tribunaux des émojis, émoticônes et autres pictogrammes?*","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.06660858882000344,"score_gpt":0.3112146181658438,"score_spread":0.24460602934584036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008263108","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26005414,0.007768179,0.046084218,0.047325883,0.0019156138,0.000074540025,0.00023830592,0.0002775553,0.6362615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96069354,0.0014060679,0.003805329,0.0016523796,0.00023118808,0.000053016283,0.000041532163,0.00008701236,0.03202985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958395,0.0028528336,0.00013650977,0.00031176492,0.0006397593,0.00021970994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962613,0.001902858,0.00053370965,0.00042809383,0.000703848,0.00017019922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050196396,0.00034827608,0.00031613448,0.0015996842,0.0030712937,0.007860272,0.0004672982,0.0009995835,0.005071811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012353309,0.00021530694,0.00019321687,0.0017493863,0.015055854,0.00575467,0.002017651,0.0020363822,0.001093495],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008299208,0.000017844426,0.0074259485,0.00020095783,0.000020925072,0.00021691433,0.1971927,0.00014189183,0.002296969,0.7127086,0.009466878,0.07022741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022961098,0.000121518904,0.045806162,0.0009422462,0.000063303254,0.0012651345,0.29611844,0.0013162176,0.0038950178,0.1632773,0.48703408,0.00013765141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008809552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010432924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008809552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019489977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015860904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026546657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008454355","doi":"10.4324/9781315264868-10","title":"Howard Zehr (1990), 'A Restorative Lens', in Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice, Waterloo, Ontario: Herald Press, pp. 177-214.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Lens (geology); Criminology; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.06702791694670393,"score_gpt":0.3253735889888986,"score_spread":0.2583456720421947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008454355","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016039464,0.7851728,0.0021617955,0.16769992,0.0038647573,0.000042780957,0.000322492,0.00009092696,0.039040588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06483775,0.81202626,0.0039329156,0.03533832,0.0033278626,0.00014319373,0.0002326983,0.00022290282,0.07993816],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804074,0.00070894783,0.00012706577,0.00016803727,0.0006966047,0.00025860083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969111,0.0018019818,0.00023240915,0.00007523385,0.0006782725,0.00030104446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038426935,0.0013731695,0.0009013398,0.0031606774,0.007226466,0.008131005,0.0023178249,0.007164708,0.013804671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068686455,0.0012742043,0.0005184591,0.004737286,0.010174847,0.01447624,0.0022763666,0.005449303,0.004552493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052777115,0.000029469276,0.0008140598,0.0005897219,0.0000125595725,0.00016333823,0.01075309,0.000097890246,0.00013832096,0.06425134,0.8678968,0.055200696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029487312,0.000015154411,0.0060882005,0.0016321212,0.000025898229,0.00021808215,0.014639981,0.000088507804,0.00036909495,0.05536932,0.9214792,0.000044904078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.231718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48080772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.768282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00892944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013229973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46073848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009715318","doi":"10.22584/nr50.2020.004","title":"Questions about Questions: Law and Film Reflections on the Duty to Learn","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Northern Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Duty; Obligation; Commission; Law; Sociology; Work (physics); Focus (optics); Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.07049516747434181,"score_gpt":0.36870459950338136,"score_spread":0.29820943202903955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009715318","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03940891,0.30301094,0.0014014913,0.51729614,0.008277531,0.000113887596,0.00022477859,0.000030152638,0.13023616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5620944,0.27892986,0.0014541978,0.1237543,0.0042222417,0.00028628844,0.000202006,0.00011149492,0.028945204],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97396606,0.021982837,0.00053170975,0.000773476,0.0015877283,0.0011580916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9447318,0.04942095,0.0012652978,0.00060347805,0.0030221639,0.0009563368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019951291,0.0006295596,0.0006970679,0.0024758326,0.013338546,0.011114275,0.0017341849,0.007687171,0.0055829217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046566404,0.0005006691,0.0005877219,0.0035728405,0.027247885,0.016003672,0.005778359,0.011764808,0.0006549653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050506544,0.00004052923,0.0006489675,0.001795473,0.000029363717,0.00082295935,0.63753295,0.000096575284,0.00027150122,0.19367929,0.12986657,0.035165396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009934069,0.000024082774,0.00093242055,0.003193181,0.000018064879,0.0002175163,0.31470805,0.000031066695,0.00020041542,0.01004073,0.67060447,0.000020039239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078136005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11210314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078136005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016646858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010642008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15536237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011311497","doi":"10.7202/1067747ar","title":"La mémoire des gestes de l’esclavage dans les pratiques performatives caribéennes","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"L’Annuaire théâtral Revue québécoise d’études théâtrales","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030289954943846426,"score_gpt":0.27490289625156794,"score_spread":0.24461294130772152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011311497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5506887,0.01815799,0.006891457,0.012913198,0.0005258121,0.000042906817,0.00019508864,0.00007092133,0.41051397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93020135,0.004142508,0.0015777876,0.00038463986,0.00005472179,0.000026118792,0.00003630526,0.00006394209,0.06351266],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843377,0.0008787409,0.00002538389,0.00016177192,0.00020849725,0.0002918275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987502,0.00055166497,0.00019127023,0.00012142314,0.00021227465,0.0001732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017108495,0.00059876236,0.00035027493,0.0016101052,0.011700381,0.0049522184,0.0005940206,0.0012498599,0.009638349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021359294,0.00024010496,0.00020596852,0.0019111828,0.023900202,0.0023668804,0.004284697,0.0020022239,0.00075041014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058134763,0.000015250814,0.006706072,0.00023038355,0.000014290788,0.0011306766,0.7734006,0.00019767374,0.0012188068,0.18154183,0.003261068,0.032225173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067765864,0.000040300187,0.020624613,0.00063486793,0.000016553397,0.00071619847,0.4058456,0.000082875355,0.00049314444,0.006467531,0.5650316,0.00003990767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25002566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5251514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25002566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010031956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005817902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4971407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013062100","doi":"","title":"Natural Law and the Nature of Law: A Response to Commentators","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Flinders University; Monash University; Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Toronto; Macquarie University; University of Alberta; University of Oxford; York University; Bond University; Georgetown University","keywords":"Law; Natural law; Flourishing; Natural order; Natural (archaeology); Philosophy of law; Political science; Positive law; Comparative law; Politics; Private law; Black letter law; Sociology; History; Psychology","score_opus":0.01777212022424591,"score_gpt":0.29901306901999775,"score_spread":0.28124094879575184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013062100","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033905142,0.0013023255,0.00009634632,0.98670924,0.010395985,0.000008202138,0.000028443574,0.000018664463,0.0011016309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009788313,0.0015565683,0.00028161562,0.96529007,0.017665805,0.00008157577,0.000029518818,0.00012618024,0.005180336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96981627,0.0155800115,0.002281458,0.0036332847,0.0059558623,0.0027331177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8378845,0.12846865,0.0058339774,0.0031930506,0.019552058,0.0050678183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039045673,0.0018575143,0.0024815507,0.0023632396,0.019860454,0.01428149,0.0100484025,0.06565051,0.009589169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13551004,0.0016555414,0.002391302,0.005016376,0.028347777,0.023077017,0.0111897485,0.07734047,0.0037602747],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031546333,0.00001296871,0.00019566291,0.00012372204,0.000009132383,0.00042980065,0.008606455,0.000068299996,0.00011372759,0.015891386,0.9729847,0.0015326279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030854215,0.000022901677,0.0007676682,0.00096071145,0.00001944007,0.00029580566,0.021645859,0.00033779797,0.000256475,0.014491847,0.9610333,0.00013722842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028560942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02576813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06565051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020708578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017905768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20649576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013378574","doi":"","title":"A 'Reasonable' Expectation of Sexual Privacy in the Digital Age","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Voyeurism; Plaintiff; Supreme court; The Right to Privacy; Sexual assault; Law; Value (mathematics); Political science; Psychology; Internet privacy; Sociology; Criminology; Social psychology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.00943517184849526,"score_gpt":0.267397758671073,"score_spread":0.2579625868225778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013378574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24567947,0.0021437057,0.04692512,0.16455036,0.0004377545,0.00015451125,0.00022138646,0.00009658173,0.53979105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98614025,0.00024608622,0.002074445,0.0077462327,0.00005819275,0.000029285331,0.000022612732,0.000009081426,0.0036738182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776433,0.007824898,0.0012391877,0.0020587891,0.008264462,0.00296924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9757176,0.013486426,0.0026451515,0.0026555057,0.004155037,0.0013403858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015798071,0.00020036697,0.0004708976,0.00090996973,0.008728956,0.010821184,0.0017243195,0.008217155,0.0018546634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032941435,0.0004080089,0.00052417273,0.00069812423,0.049249243,0.0064592715,0.0048290254,0.007732095,0.00027816673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013679358,0.000010594972,0.0012040918,0.00001569585,0.000004974499,0.0002389426,0.011018967,0.00021077321,0.00023768352,0.9827185,0.0012083031,0.0031178037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049839662,0.0001238225,0.009680689,0.00053395727,0.000036349593,0.0011298131,0.031749945,0.0021344647,0.0021408815,0.7805487,0.17166089,0.00021067414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23409425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18687052,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23409425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016807256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02557606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46546334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013805194","doi":"10.1353/tj.2020.0000","title":"Performing Post-Truth: An Interview with Director Ashlie Corcoran","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theatre Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Truth telling; Face (sociological concept); Law; History; Psychology; Sociology; Literature; Art; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.0411180674503281,"score_gpt":0.29035792871819455,"score_spread":0.24923986126786646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013805194","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01822347,0.0075121582,0.001065858,0.9214699,0.0062898197,0.00017432508,0.00009529261,0.000085844564,0.045083333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23953307,0.008285914,0.0021502953,0.65205973,0.0035293922,0.00056049257,0.00011328293,0.00059335126,0.093174435],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96986747,0.01866696,0.0006680415,0.0020433413,0.0052066143,0.00354759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9571795,0.021127375,0.0019093389,0.0009651702,0.008332735,0.01048598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023677608,0.00097416487,0.0012682008,0.0021061492,0.051085677,0.016242329,0.0041266857,0.016184555,0.01199103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051129762,0.0013542674,0.00055211067,0.0024533197,0.025358768,0.014865863,0.007978916,0.04114988,0.0031977147],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004603,0.00011144855,0.0010973269,0.0001712585,0.000006644759,0.002044198,0.42513326,0.00009146636,0.00067494606,0.018292475,0.5412964,0.011034455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007571341,0.000034051754,0.00059498486,0.00036116113,0.0000027060553,0.00061141513,0.4156341,0.00008575506,0.00020160573,0.0014173843,0.580986,0.00006321415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09828968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13020363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09828968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023462411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024350367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1954351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014818298","doi":"10.3138/ctr.182.005","title":"Acting under Natural Laws","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Contempt; Imprisonment; Prison; Civil disobedience; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology; Criminology; Politics","score_opus":0.03832373003163123,"score_gpt":0.3015755332465499,"score_spread":0.26325180321491864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014818298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008322017,0.005758803,0.0012417791,0.049047485,0.0022458357,0.000078569836,0.00012668494,0.000071050614,0.93310773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2821631,0.0060892794,0.0013284452,0.040235285,0.00054269837,0.00011643025,0.00020798143,0.00012255138,0.66919416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99281657,0.0018846103,0.0001828695,0.00074266276,0.002207392,0.0021658472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971691,0.00055267854,0.00016396504,0.0002890444,0.0012075178,0.0006177752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049276776,0.000400445,0.0003271165,0.00070914644,0.017462878,0.006274247,0.0010425071,0.0030443335,0.025309892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008914408,0.00020763726,0.0003214574,0.0005271881,0.015200421,0.00266459,0.0035884446,0.005419639,0.004008222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001503067,0.000021347556,0.00084958447,0.000099342455,0.0000058290766,0.00028686074,0.027597444,0.00009053025,0.00042784738,0.6498334,0.28517884,0.03559393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022511874,0.000004663479,0.0005606773,0.000098062475,0.0000018925973,0.00004627212,0.005400617,0.000018458775,0.00009810532,0.0060012867,0.98776025,0.000007464267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57708883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79125875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57708883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017696735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0548924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85080355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015557224","doi":"","title":"(En)Gendering Indian Law: Indigenous Feminist Legal Theory in the United States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Political science; Feminist legal theory; Feminist theory; Gender studies; Sociology; Feminism","score_opus":0.011940698922629256,"score_gpt":0.264722434875009,"score_spread":0.25278173595237974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015557224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14431421,0.010334782,0.002494159,0.070994526,0.0005251014,0.000017419858,0.000044378925,0.000026740687,0.77124876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799762,0.002531724,0.0005821954,0.0037152409,0.0001042791,0.000017199169,0.000008190563,0.0000054098746,0.013059445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988745,0.00057888834,0.000020382504,0.00010366422,0.00017150577,0.00025113876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999209,0.0004330182,0.000071063216,0.000036898975,0.00012839005,0.00012161883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018178895,0.00012900158,0.00013325067,0.0012636262,0.011064822,0.004355065,0.00080618274,0.0017954198,0.0033775144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014668076,0.00011276264,0.00020987469,0.0011428419,0.015058654,0.0024044595,0.0022776772,0.0021688445,0.00013813496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046470195,0.000019339957,0.0010298518,0.000028060203,0.0000015770361,0.00014879166,0.06626081,0.00010842036,0.00008060652,0.9178136,0.0048513403,0.009652943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010737791,0.00004491852,0.015048749,0.0008566868,0.000030014902,0.0003940793,0.28052518,0.001437377,0.00043549502,0.31750664,0.383663,0.000047056838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30299926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43983972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30299926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010330726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007840002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60247123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015836921","doi":"10.1386/public_00024_4","title":"Candace Hicks, Many Mini Murder Scenes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario College of Art and Design","funders":"","keywords":"Printmaking; Visual arts; Art; Scale (ratio); Composition (language); Art history; Literature; Cartography; Geography; Painting","score_opus":0.04807068941040747,"score_gpt":0.2920955602833812,"score_spread":0.2440248708729737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015836921","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042275168,0.6112343,0.0005781869,0.012086857,0.0034778253,0.00007898914,0.00035995353,0.00010931243,0.32979938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36232603,0.44352734,0.0010713664,0.007425283,0.0022603977,0.00013066722,0.0006895105,0.00017437531,0.18239509],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993765,0.00020174713,0.000023301867,0.00008391469,0.00023190767,0.00008264239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994973,0.0002451744,0.00007784537,0.00003723013,0.00009873515,0.00004372355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069209473,0.00046387312,0.00022994391,0.0011927941,0.0028638274,0.0037279853,0.0005954172,0.0011030717,0.019272448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015390291,0.00021683288,0.00020851675,0.0009801843,0.002637538,0.0021100682,0.0016005391,0.0011035858,0.002367368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013155816,0.0000638523,0.0020748675,0.0049682525,0.000048707127,0.00094321324,0.04708162,0.000168707,0.0012133984,0.020473769,0.34575948,0.5770727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026136854,0.00001911565,0.0045308797,0.0020351475,0.000008789438,0.00046731535,0.020121537,0.0000063904836,0.00027239215,0.0005582728,0.97196984,0.000007834371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0101006515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036643147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019272448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015615952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014718685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064472735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3018057624","doi":"10.25071/1913-9632.39549","title":"Neoliberalism, Law and its Discontents: Three Recent Interventions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Left History An Interdisciplinary Journal of Historical Inquiry and Debate","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Neoliberalism (international relations); Democracy; Inequality; Political science; Capital (architecture); Sociology; Political economy; Law and economics; Economic history; Law; Art; History; Politics","score_opus":0.1954161415466668,"score_gpt":0.3576419962379318,"score_spread":0.162225854691265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3018057624","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002621189,0.78213674,0.0010236931,0.17134918,0.0017764748,0.000016635237,0.000025510073,0.000015710966,0.04103499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18407866,0.7468862,0.0017981614,0.05020105,0.004884258,0.00020599502,0.000060087914,0.00006262633,0.011822899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481237,0.003108766,0.00017397865,0.0005380045,0.00091031805,0.00045664492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812376,0.015171506,0.00094557286,0.00077542476,0.001081308,0.0007886243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011223772,0.0008720987,0.001174194,0.0039993282,0.0052604033,0.011994663,0.002177793,0.009683125,0.0085859895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016945079,0.00049149763,0.00058507634,0.006085809,0.05378592,0.020864997,0.0094150575,0.00996483,0.0008164793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026655587,0.000068056775,0.00019420624,0.0006446059,0.000011662791,0.000040585037,0.0056736576,0.0001047673,0.00005236305,0.9070117,0.02175128,0.06442059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003057319,0.00004041955,0.0015184401,0.00445599,0.000019257057,0.00012634766,0.009082797,0.00020896053,0.00020564458,0.37373993,0.6105354,0.00003626614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009041633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012168337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015734443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015734443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0133808395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11416191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3019731050","doi":"","title":"Justice As Harmony: The Distinct Resonance of Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin's Juridical Genius","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Harmony (color); Jurisprudence; Law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Adversarial system; Dispute resolution; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.02445187466344165,"score_gpt":0.3052741933592199,"score_spread":0.28082231869577823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3019731050","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043693792,0.020501446,0.010681381,0.70987093,0.0057851644,0.000056948244,0.000025172973,0.00008830812,0.20929685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8826405,0.0032046156,0.0027028348,0.087023385,0.0030361386,0.000076371434,0.000012339286,0.00013199476,0.02117181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.977102,0.013337719,0.0006031199,0.0023885313,0.0043424675,0.002226199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871863,0.007825078,0.00086408394,0.000651669,0.0015045787,0.0019681666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018275585,0.0002855743,0.0007907222,0.0018595417,0.021880511,0.025004562,0.0018939035,0.00816064,0.002190686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028233426,0.0005183222,0.00035179828,0.0011603992,0.06208232,0.010635569,0.012072077,0.015995692,0.00037014764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012071856,0.000013278243,0.00023904018,0.00003213404,0.0000060390516,0.00017335867,0.04723999,0.00006757708,0.00012009155,0.9206037,0.023997134,0.007495576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029883991,0.000040921394,0.0007630625,0.0002548931,0.000010055042,0.00016245795,0.030165562,0.0002648172,0.0002541244,0.6439259,0.32406816,0.000060231152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011787281,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017419985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008768426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012201723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09665173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022522540","doi":"10.1525/nclr.2015.18.4.510","title":"Restorative Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Retributive justice; Economic Justice; Work (physics); Popularity; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Engineering; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.16196151140294437,"score_gpt":0.4086180467847368,"score_spread":0.2466565353817924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022522540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011011574,0.025445335,0.031043462,0.07275517,0.0036952489,0.0004763085,0.00025733837,0.00046040912,0.8548551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52303636,0.040263936,0.054230936,0.075379334,0.0037733424,0.0011349341,0.0006092517,0.0008383254,0.30073363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854902,0.004681662,0.00079906685,0.0017022471,0.005483078,0.0018436942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98852473,0.003314365,0.001314625,0.0025680768,0.002886777,0.0013914669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009509604,0.00078777556,0.0009132757,0.0031245248,0.010208592,0.0075563616,0.003050489,0.0057343203,0.031509914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023838867,0.00037473862,0.0011108853,0.0016210404,0.01466586,0.0069166757,0.013430207,0.0073763626,0.0063217888],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020011661,0.0001761019,0.0019290085,0.0008221657,0.000047617003,0.00036480336,0.0075133466,0.00033667727,0.0009526526,0.65684474,0.106013246,0.22497965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070265087,0.00005834652,0.0024012963,0.0012620353,0.000015059968,0.00052904524,0.00475495,0.000114389666,0.00044652857,0.12803228,0.86235106,0.000027879629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003980003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009522877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031509914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00441107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011475546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10541111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024003392","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Aboriginal Law Research Guide: First Nations by-laws, land codes and other","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0594259417165905,"score_gpt":0.41828377710881937,"score_spread":0.3588578353922289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024003392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010205121,0.017063847,0.0029038778,0.0121841775,0.0027361065,0.000752336,0.08217791,0.0019286377,0.87004805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02616662,0.013388399,0.009585683,0.0026377328,0.0004310309,0.0018361622,0.03688369,0.0015958886,0.9074748],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998706,0.0003253035,0.00013748597,0.000063643565,0.00058933586,0.00017825533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936265,0.0017758855,0.00026314732,0.0003425071,0.0036679725,0.000323946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003607572,0.00070896297,0.00054322317,0.006648755,0.0042243525,0.0046681436,0.0010510565,0.0015916586,0.10368311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009790927,0.00074712426,0.00039046182,0.010620472,0.001308564,0.00469592,0.002180054,0.0025540811,0.033948284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019938116,0.000028278166,0.0013608848,0.00040460218,0.0000033362385,0.000051424733,0.004351527,0.00005980109,0.000066830675,0.020245977,0.9103634,0.06304415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048593856,0.0000067250435,0.0048321574,0.0008244569,0.0000041785706,0.000058179845,0.0046069934,0.000052262156,0.00010915808,0.0024062921,0.9870777,0.000017021444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22487347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40513754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7751265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005077859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024543501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44712913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024401052","doi":"10.1177/1532708620917421","title":"Freedom of Information Research and Cultural Studies: A Subterranean Affinity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Culture Studies &#x2194 Critical Methodologies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Transparency (behavior); Opposition (politics); Freedom of information; Field (mathematics); Epistemology; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.5102708390091867,"score_gpt":0.5428361058878761,"score_spread":0.032565266878689436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024401052","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14612629,0.012458844,0.33780962,0.09722998,0.0007709538,0.00030630003,0.0000902977,0.00014170803,0.40506604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783059,0.0014854271,0.0149625465,0.0018388737,0.00015684801,0.0002305303,0.0000123834825,0.000046480574,0.0029610845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91457886,0.07549234,0.001728589,0.0024762899,0.0043597855,0.0013641721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90655595,0.07498901,0.0044524493,0.010283523,0.0022501415,0.0014688537],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04310228,0.0005564507,0.0007914033,0.00536452,0.010082655,0.01539366,0.0013412181,0.0037996324,0.0027503935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04648237,0.0005868392,0.0007289588,0.0041824444,0.115744516,0.022928463,0.017993059,0.005859083,0.00030722332],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070451056,0.0000056706326,0.00024002773,0.00003508378,0.000004307499,0.000044620167,0.03260521,0.000081317005,0.00009718478,0.96359366,0.0001575154,0.0031284255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001184763,0.000023701916,0.0003556201,0.00027757915,0.00000890714,0.00019000098,0.027746577,0.00042807395,0.00031819902,0.9306131,0.04000662,0.000019709636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019690308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018277558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98991734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007348198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006169857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22794938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026495319","doi":"10.1111/jols.12228","title":"The Remarkable Rise of ‘Law and Historical Memory’ in Europe: Theorizing Trends and Prospects in the Recent Literature","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021497485744481997,"score_gpt":0.26963670667044276,"score_spread":0.24813922092596077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026495319","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14216499,0.5971969,0.0031273167,0.062771074,0.0009107679,0.00001819927,0.00008559084,0.000023156548,0.19370198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91774964,0.076567434,0.00041710454,0.0026093724,0.00045902224,0.000015842574,0.00002896018,0.000021441767,0.0021312027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978781,0.0010186365,0.00011017012,0.00033312212,0.00027033503,0.00038967805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952833,0.0036706931,0.00036620302,0.00025779707,0.00022847943,0.00019360254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050143627,0.00041537854,0.00056997116,0.0058679967,0.0062267072,0.020490063,0.0015908352,0.004965008,0.0026714252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006185757,0.00035569185,0.00033218504,0.009524388,0.04440051,0.02010318,0.0057732137,0.0036044884,0.00019105329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022117649,0.00002016314,0.0015768695,0.00023060442,0.000018051296,0.00023237341,0.09782475,0.0001814321,0.00004638091,0.87286437,0.002656616,0.02432632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020379632,0.00004207755,0.016566925,0.005076159,0.000050500144,0.00068662805,0.2072394,0.00048815005,0.00027672865,0.42460918,0.34487286,0.000071022165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014471254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018911457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020490063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076095234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039369906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055211186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3027696720","doi":"10.1017/cls.2019.21","title":"Play-by-Play Justice: Tweeting Criminal Trials in the Digital Age","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Political science; Normative; Social media; Economic Justice; Criminal court; Politics; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Public relations; Internet privacy; Computer science; International law","score_opus":0.044142178216352565,"score_gpt":0.3035892497061715,"score_spread":0.25944707148981894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3027696720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82505167,0.0072691413,0.0075799525,0.035732258,0.00058720395,0.00028541952,0.0021748669,0.00013044696,0.12118901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98675054,0.0029787975,0.0025455824,0.0025602644,0.00021313524,0.0001084185,0.00022896075,0.000048944443,0.0045653447],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99250907,0.0041811853,0.0003008948,0.00060192647,0.0018251332,0.0005818208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9592236,0.026712723,0.0065005403,0.002481625,0.0034250051,0.001656518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049887174,0.00021833468,0.00030132395,0.0038595118,0.0065444154,0.009375626,0.0009351581,0.0014862863,0.0055038165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036099635,0.00025172645,0.00017686939,0.0059161703,0.006958357,0.008669877,0.0035497607,0.0016669101,0.00069119525],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021196777,0.00014760808,0.16624248,0.0014469946,0.00013007883,0.0018998793,0.5277851,0.0003710049,0.0030200353,0.048329458,0.028276876,0.2221385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002132249,0.00008316221,0.14817391,0.0021065227,0.00010286511,0.00091448124,0.5228336,0.0008393941,0.001743617,0.017050024,0.3059937,0.00013738591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10648251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26287127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10648251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005045572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055809333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21172541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3032619614","doi":"10.22455/2619-0311-2018-4-40-64","title":"Shame and Guilt in Dostoevsky’s “Crime and Punishment”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dostoevsky and World Culture Philological journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Punishment (psychology); Criminology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology","score_opus":0.027578691656582676,"score_gpt":0.3165688889698178,"score_spread":0.2889901973132351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3032619614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37045836,0.010696674,0.018768916,0.037603676,0.0024379564,0.00008633609,0.00023469837,0.00022660875,0.5594868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97964776,0.000615798,0.000825928,0.0014693334,0.0001391237,0.000030289657,0.000046236102,0.000067425164,0.0171582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998657,0.000855684,0.000047731453,0.00012855553,0.00018058314,0.00013040176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993794,0.0003367261,0.00009779497,0.000048492373,0.000071488306,0.000066039815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062297855,0.00046527915,0.0002411677,0.00048638126,0.0033272917,0.0031301454,0.00052099355,0.00134411,0.0015181437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026990857,0.00021072708,0.00021221492,0.0002244476,0.01047161,0.0024769315,0.0025552972,0.002610741,0.0004178759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001226058,0.000037092923,0.001530114,0.00016169726,0.000013839018,0.0008024192,0.15818197,0.0004361652,0.001111912,0.81290996,0.016317133,0.008375115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004009923,0.000098870936,0.0039732424,0.00032949672,0.000030260173,0.0019666331,0.046815656,0.0009154655,0.0029619983,0.16780531,0.7750027,0.00006031456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020609763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023223371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033272917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001782899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083870714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012935877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035802145","doi":"","title":"Creating a Revenge Porn Tort for Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Fredericton; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Tort; Plaintiff; Law; Supreme court; Business; Harm; Political science; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Liability; Sociology","score_opus":0.012264977959651294,"score_gpt":0.26203760452407604,"score_spread":0.24977262656442475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035802145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06743415,0.0043093823,0.018513912,0.1579972,0.0018136161,0.0008832808,0.0010417841,0.00085632276,0.74715036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5504054,0.0050712097,0.034132157,0.03391662,0.00046820915,0.0002996084,0.00077262096,0.0002495525,0.37468463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939598,0.00033055167,0.00008653115,0.0004150832,0.0035453297,0.0016627676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99652785,0.0004991604,0.00011697002,0.00025359646,0.0016696268,0.00093266903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022927523,0.00049821334,0.00036491692,0.0024238487,0.018364377,0.007491039,0.001808289,0.005930434,0.016163167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007018226,0.0005632371,0.0009603927,0.0018749117,0.0060049645,0.0029140771,0.0045761378,0.0042001535,0.0011110118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052365383,0.000096924115,0.0035651526,0.00007512413,0.000021854281,0.0011549679,0.0025773768,0.0021212786,0.0011802309,0.7506263,0.19477852,0.043749895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006548107,0.00006493847,0.004818669,0.00019595699,0.00006382186,0.00061389204,0.0025939692,0.005569491,0.0010942833,0.025525825,0.9592281,0.00016555568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96406907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9795671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0705841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0705841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.118179806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5121259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036897321","doi":"10.1111/1745-5871.12424","title":"Legal geography: Perspective and methods. TayanahO'Donnell, Daniel FRobinson, and JosephineGillespieLondon: Routledge; 2020. xvii and 310 pp. ISBN‐10: 1138387371 and ISBN‐13: 978‐1138387379 $73","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geographical Research","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Economic geography; Humanities; Geography; Media studies; Philosophy; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.038466635314806874,"score_gpt":0.38503966835974124,"score_spread":0.34657303304493436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036897321","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00086931454,0.7621701,0.006797479,0.06527668,0.004517482,0.00008036603,0.00048676383,0.00016068186,0.15964101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028210837,0.69387126,0.009787747,0.008235065,0.0027022192,0.00057648186,0.0006529855,0.0005087988,0.25545463],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997062,0.0015762959,0.0001927283,0.00033691892,0.000674284,0.00015773921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99396294,0.004539077,0.00043413846,0.00029989952,0.0004614558,0.00030254814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037574177,0.0012814825,0.0013081846,0.003693365,0.0037838717,0.010083335,0.0016125699,0.004067716,0.03379322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008052464,0.0022229976,0.00059025205,0.008761843,0.0109886015,0.012926817,0.0038969931,0.0057459217,0.010791635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017019443,0.000023349461,0.00029609198,0.0017084394,0.00002022559,0.00017390671,0.018397478,0.00020742867,0.00016117199,0.2190144,0.60848165,0.15149894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028922702,0.0000039812926,0.00035001079,0.0021250364,0.000004042801,0.000084648105,0.003910593,0.000037085832,0.00003346137,0.028295336,0.9651441,0.000008874849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023880208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043432985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03379322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007302609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010338217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11304957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037946181","doi":"10.1162/desi_a_00602","title":"Airlines, Mayonnaise, and Justice: Reflections on the Theory and Practice of Legal Design and Technology","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Design Issues","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Advantage Forensics (Canada); Public Works and Government Services Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Instrumentalism; Cognitive reframing; Economic Justice; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Epistemology; Political science; Management science; Law; Engineering; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0872845116107147,"score_gpt":0.3870108811554813,"score_spread":0.2997263695447666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037946181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120704986,0.014152484,0.10100791,0.23941077,0.0010546737,0.00015856326,0.000050978415,0.00025067688,0.523209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94345623,0.0041623446,0.016088588,0.0069513763,0.00017991077,0.0002326933,0.00001496443,0.00018142388,0.028732518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9570907,0.03831519,0.0004537166,0.0011579818,0.0019380844,0.0010442605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97705567,0.01990415,0.0005948737,0.0010618696,0.0008463524,0.0005371571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023838691,0.0005675404,0.0005635198,0.0015465351,0.015058816,0.015326866,0.002011524,0.005872714,0.005188819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017532934,0.00066809624,0.0006033424,0.001576053,0.087755755,0.014240588,0.0067042443,0.007858878,0.0005141032],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011467644,0.00003758927,0.00040334807,0.00009523204,0.0000042614597,0.00015485602,0.21161236,0.00031263437,0.00018282555,0.77504385,0.0030251467,0.009116445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035392557,0.00010623719,0.0008130025,0.0009058608,0.000017202663,0.00034467233,0.23816495,0.0015160434,0.0007059845,0.20756641,0.54978126,0.000043002172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031755164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04759553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031755164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018817563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01203743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13653159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038105679","doi":"10.1163/15730352-bja04502003","title":"Artur Kozak’s Juriscentrist Concept of Law: a Central European Innovation in Legal Theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Central and East European Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research University Higher School of Economics; Queen's University; Narodowym Centrum Nauki; Queen's University Belfast; Sveučilište u Zagrebu","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Legal realism; International law; Legal history; Philosophy of law; Postmodernism; Legitimacy; Sociology; Political science; Sociology of law; Epistemology; Comparative law; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021567156588886537,"score_gpt":0.26177462603544377,"score_spread":0.24020746944655724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038105679","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015719453,0.7410487,0.035621777,0.12638654,0.004992861,0.00007312167,0.00008555331,0.00010703448,0.07596501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35759562,0.5391463,0.025322335,0.036041077,0.0069110724,0.0002737303,0.00014856238,0.00019081663,0.03437049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964993,0.001441821,0.00025513244,0.00061057816,0.0010388573,0.00015426899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972554,0.0018675751,0.00023717957,0.00017480088,0.0003657059,0.0000994518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043321047,0.00065425225,0.00091965316,0.0045555644,0.0016862906,0.0074992194,0.00090568635,0.0034955684,0.0012736807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005134966,0.00039242598,0.0004096842,0.0038713284,0.013564778,0.010162135,0.0035267952,0.005736012,0.0006204566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019629813,0.000026725458,0.00027089336,0.00044174728,0.000016868591,0.000111975656,0.0031733166,0.00017647722,0.00021838087,0.9411383,0.011268762,0.04313689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021580765,0.00003358,0.001350069,0.001486115,0.00001937922,0.0004401815,0.001305517,0.0005603955,0.00037416193,0.3486891,0.64568156,0.000038409773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023671126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001681085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074992194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046750326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003921445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03391987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038512320","doi":"10.22329/il.v40i2.6329","title":"Evidence, Persuasion and Diversity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Diversity (politics); Supreme court; Theme (computing); Law; Focus (optics); Political science; Constitutional law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1090334188746578,"score_gpt":0.29694606258841155,"score_spread":0.18791264371375377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038512320","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02186216,0.080382206,0.0046309023,0.7685816,0.0042486694,0.00008530169,0.00022234299,0.00003595538,0.11995087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83804905,0.048177335,0.005649089,0.09073766,0.005430018,0.00021399024,0.00022068805,0.00010292745,0.011419137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9271843,0.04195279,0.0032579987,0.0038257292,0.0197559,0.0040232604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6168258,0.34626433,0.0059164604,0.008341331,0.018462524,0.0041894917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.090935476,0.0006530695,0.0017012754,0.008682632,0.007511417,0.025201363,0.0029323979,0.007614361,0.010995652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22189699,0.00058584835,0.0007310093,0.005986379,0.046907566,0.019779727,0.012500678,0.010918701,0.0005684941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093202696,0.000057948575,0.0037335712,0.001866484,0.00012803327,0.0003428448,0.033360224,0.00034029485,0.00026850222,0.7702189,0.05196936,0.13762066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000672197,0.000057765476,0.0068817283,0.014838133,0.00008845137,0.00020134886,0.04540187,0.00037548208,0.0005771097,0.5001361,0.43125236,0.0001224863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071116135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06791539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090935476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02111489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0222007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48091853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3038789850","doi":"10.1163/2211906x-00902001","title":"Language of Law and Invasive Legal Species – Endemic Systems, Colonisation, and Viability of Mixed Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Colonisation; Lifeworld; Legal culture; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Process (computing); Law; Ecology; Political science; Social science; Biology; Colonization","score_opus":0.041591412795089176,"score_gpt":0.31906491321033814,"score_spread":0.277473500415249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3038789850","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85764724,0.0013420784,0.0035078004,0.007084154,0.000026468188,0.000027385158,0.000019904137,0.000013758347,0.13033125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989723,0.000104201405,0.00023710511,0.00008520225,0.0000052121623,0.0000044472554,0.000003107404,0.0000018478939,0.0005866765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950504,0.0028432966,0.00016834981,0.00036088112,0.0007420098,0.00083520013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98779,0.006646897,0.0027394146,0.00059124135,0.0014109557,0.0008215195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041840295,0.00024470038,0.0004211429,0.0021871857,0.0065132147,0.009326493,0.0016043741,0.0016350315,0.0033968268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013128572,0.00022415505,0.00024997027,0.0018014626,0.042581074,0.009353874,0.0065781516,0.0015412061,0.00019799381],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049582435,0.00008634862,0.032365933,0.00015123325,0.000027645436,0.0028727986,0.15059526,0.000692645,0.0011353241,0.79398936,0.0005407139,0.017493146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045741184,0.00027665976,0.07250532,0.0009626382,0.00008702963,0.0046973894,0.4880701,0.005733412,0.0015975218,0.38312978,0.042739276,0.00015517505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03114978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040558707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03114978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008567848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005629622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062164426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039621799","doi":"","title":"Punishing Black Bodies in Canada: Making Blackness Visible in Criminal Sentencing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Nuclear Safety and Security Commission","keywords":"Criminology; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0222015423231012,"score_gpt":0.28579078924886264,"score_spread":0.26358924692576147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039621799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83893806,0.0025025406,0.0010098568,0.06317625,0.00048437846,0.0002512304,0.00016288349,0.000056177818,0.0934187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843556,0.00161314,0.0012867381,0.0031169842,0.000028011193,0.000043060347,0.000048167567,0.000018973973,0.009489341],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953803,0.0010384828,0.000065207445,0.00019550417,0.0013112024,0.0020093075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941672,0.0006890786,0.0004643422,0.00009664861,0.0021040654,0.002478571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033099535,0.00032814912,0.00032485338,0.00149041,0.029577915,0.0051466767,0.0021164585,0.0016309686,0.003934845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014448042,0.0003494346,0.0002752563,0.0015391308,0.0056467364,0.0013050261,0.0050869174,0.00339571,0.00026956448],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003906929,0.0007249085,0.15375583,0.0005303404,0.000087711924,0.0021377064,0.2646277,0.001975099,0.0030590843,0.05638861,0.10382234,0.4125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007173661,0.00030479685,0.3139919,0.0016953956,0.0002486604,0.00042174617,0.51710576,0.0023343773,0.0018285806,0.007980939,0.15377694,0.0002392692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9918019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1002043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1002043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25659102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7270365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041794359","doi":"10.18192/potentia.v6i0.4417","title":"Should there be a 'Right to the City'?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potentia Journal of International Affairs","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Right to the city; Context (archaeology); Phrase; Space (punctuation); Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Law and economics; Law; Human rights; Political science; Environmental ethics; History; Politics; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04863567260387688,"score_gpt":0.3244574927069489,"score_spread":0.27582182010307205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041794359","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058295056,0.010528023,0.002888823,0.7561625,0.0031747143,0.000012939918,0.00009178633,0.000031967953,0.22127962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5541894,0.008778627,0.0028735995,0.29802376,0.0035638495,0.00010566347,0.00020886232,0.00012324975,0.132133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958935,0.0015630014,0.00008559695,0.0006616969,0.00075510924,0.0010412122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978516,0.00077060895,0.00016200836,0.0002625761,0.00044836322,0.000504855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042130346,0.00029765436,0.00058172864,0.0005591838,0.0063936375,0.010684101,0.0013282456,0.010302824,0.010873529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0080790855,0.000252422,0.00040993173,0.0007108675,0.030989688,0.013398698,0.0052722506,0.011650764,0.0022304994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000569732,0.000004965179,0.00012707821,0.000016172522,0.0000015844712,0.000025896414,0.0015573817,0.00002216259,0.000029034738,0.9593796,0.03544075,0.0033898384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013649025,0.000008005382,0.00043827618,0.00017956688,0.0000027498252,0.00008627775,0.0034334075,0.000046648314,0.0000801966,0.40731242,0.5883829,0.000015836167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020171272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022952639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020171272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049503855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005492743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040107727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043685488","doi":"10.1016/j.psfr.2020.01.001","title":"Why do people come to support a highly controversial law? Manipulating the clarity and coherence of a law can shape individuals’ perception and approval","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychologie Française","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"CLARITY; Perception; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Humanities; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Geography; Physics","score_opus":0.05609562717303933,"score_gpt":0.3194514359021998,"score_spread":0.2633558087291605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043685488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97648275,0.00016703535,0.001284764,0.0032415458,0.00013937107,0.000019934678,0.000028519726,0.000020076028,0.018615972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99825305,0.000042818683,0.00033113678,0.00085138634,0.000030881492,0.0000068891263,0.000018323832,0.000013643164,0.00045167678],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958146,0.0020053189,0.00018705099,0.0004022023,0.0011600627,0.00043075444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649212,0.016851857,0.009951199,0.0016998862,0.0039696624,0.002606185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004287992,0.00023680566,0.00042776027,0.0007549925,0.0018911671,0.0048926272,0.0003222134,0.002544455,0.004528073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042627785,0.00036012987,0.00030306814,0.0003957406,0.0037079114,0.0021933601,0.0011588417,0.0032048267,0.0006455502],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031472095,0.0009407179,0.5630674,0.0004818106,0.0008431049,0.0015941238,0.2464653,0.00066037395,0.073087305,0.040798683,0.009721381,0.059192672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004989315,0.0010620826,0.75504845,0.0002610023,0.00047259429,0.0011090625,0.15651457,0.0035068733,0.0056542177,0.045458023,0.030026102,0.00038808794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028472631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00324582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048926272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078689057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066180463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022677302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043774746","doi":"10.35502/jcswb.128","title":"Recovery-oriented practices within the Dartmouth Wellness Court: The Wall of Hope","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University; Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Sociology; Law; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.022531044978571946,"score_gpt":0.2907265853879417,"score_spread":0.26819554040936977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043774746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37603414,0.0016120101,0.014926311,0.05175849,0.0018982321,0.00023624186,0.0000947252,0.0005193426,0.5529205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9096634,0.0006853117,0.005502217,0.0025245768,0.00020009145,0.00009659758,0.00003284242,0.00024572175,0.081049405],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956815,0.0023218063,0.00007688308,0.0003294388,0.0008386769,0.00075166323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99552506,0.0012152543,0.00033510372,0.0003187448,0.00026153255,0.0023442116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032969948,0.0003820935,0.00025906586,0.00096011325,0.036727555,0.015127852,0.0020671014,0.0023780637,0.024056721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067647607,0.00051518733,0.00035333066,0.0010154848,0.023746824,0.0045105545,0.015382167,0.0076918607,0.0013449014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053244315,0.000185782,0.0031266082,0.000115435825,0.000011617418,0.0045101284,0.5514528,0.000538543,0.002107898,0.28515127,0.08302583,0.06972077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012065214,0.00009262943,0.004012102,0.0002887401,0.0000078701005,0.0008975136,0.45711645,0.0003746237,0.0007280452,0.011387399,0.52498555,0.00009692754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029301297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16762713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036727555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006035659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007863634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080477774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044489824","doi":"10.1007/s10691-020-09431-5","title":"Sex, Sexism, and Judicial Misconduct: How the Canadian Judicial Council Perpetuates Sexism in the Legal Realm","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual misconduct; Political science; Law; Realm; Misconduct; Ideal (ethics); Judicial discretion; Criminology; Psychology; Judicial review","score_opus":0.11739559709326783,"score_gpt":0.3084875568402541,"score_spread":0.19109195974698626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044489824","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47563797,0.0046833884,0.0011700139,0.06990129,0.0003165011,0.00004324661,0.00012997321,0.000020996285,0.44809666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986173,0.0008427878,0.00020771287,0.0021547114,0.000029107208,0.000009842423,0.000011534592,0.000015310448,0.010556053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934644,0.0016326875,0.00009629738,0.00054562214,0.0022847194,0.0019762672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881841,0.005352628,0.00089815416,0.0004643851,0.0034759187,0.0016248121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007905889,0.00026572513,0.00042908412,0.0027060246,0.03208594,0.013970286,0.002803552,0.004047895,0.008778267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01777378,0.00040599407,0.00034378195,0.0031480044,0.058218256,0.0041750097,0.005638229,0.0052945493,0.00023852692],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054725897,0.0000692451,0.021739187,0.000053200627,0.00002192252,0.00037135454,0.2282697,0.0002969029,0.00051143416,0.7097569,0.010187285,0.028668126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005418467,0.000052055544,0.08047116,0.0006266042,0.000120041295,0.0002470688,0.44256485,0.00078094564,0.00079687836,0.16801362,0.30608365,0.00018895867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97705066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9912479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89349097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10650903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20352408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7727807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045204968","doi":"10.1177/1743872120942770","title":"Confronting Jurisdiction with Antinomian Bodies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Metaphor; Law; Common law; Dance; Sociology; Political science; Art; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.02239190263427221,"score_gpt":0.23170146704050326,"score_spread":0.20930956440623105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045204968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31695497,0.0021656444,0.009204844,0.057618678,0.0008735591,0.000030482544,0.000015169311,0.00003894905,0.6130977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855802,0.00025926193,0.00035287254,0.0019613774,0.00006940601,0.000009877249,0.000003294296,0.000014189041,0.011749575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956084,0.002533836,0.000083788735,0.00048196793,0.00040776725,0.00088423927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970462,0.0017916876,0.0003261972,0.00023712235,0.00028333746,0.00031551026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004470215,0.0002767615,0.00032196593,0.0009328968,0.017189536,0.0102387685,0.0011528713,0.004791314,0.006283361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00744023,0.0003166977,0.00024410244,0.0006272822,0.053840537,0.008468387,0.00954632,0.0065022516,0.0004450699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016341335,0.00001086654,0.0007327643,0.000015189008,0.0000031797533,0.0004268645,0.1660706,0.000064806525,0.00019904556,0.8249153,0.0030118136,0.004533221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000268332,0.000046136636,0.0014386687,0.00030959363,0.000012465073,0.0005084972,0.39613327,0.00040157692,0.0007046476,0.28600454,0.3143754,0.000038282775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017319562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02887231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017319562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005967135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033696154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043294847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046708348","doi":"","title":"Property in the City Special Issue Introduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Property (philosophy); Private property; Zoning; Law and economics; Property rights; Argument (complex analysis); Mainstream; Business; Political science; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.015146863260213887,"score_gpt":0.2903316866964816,"score_spread":0.2751848234362677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046708348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014372715,0.11552159,0.0017301219,0.19645944,0.11085212,0.0002747694,0.0021393707,0.0003530492,0.57123226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033687975,0.08361865,0.0010483895,0.17573321,0.12046337,0.0008410336,0.002426367,0.00057522656,0.58160585],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937775,0.0006851798,0.00043823099,0.0009939033,0.0030043826,0.0011009196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933931,0.0021566479,0.00039291833,0.0005336083,0.003025091,0.0004986305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038777238,0.00094779197,0.0012817065,0.0051699206,0.00728668,0.013109947,0.0032216788,0.014776998,0.04111052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011447614,0.00087297213,0.0015925999,0.0029095558,0.0047766864,0.008012316,0.0040377476,0.013986262,0.01686153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004207157,0.000021180564,0.00013838464,0.00015261515,0.0000070416586,0.00009042579,0.00016793286,0.000063431886,0.000050409893,0.0694336,0.9221853,0.0076853605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002164587,0.000005760079,0.00042449022,0.00027806178,0.0000059610197,0.000037171376,0.00006967354,0.00003090969,0.000023003213,0.002471019,0.99664366,0.0000081947765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07530604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060252767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07530604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011524271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011647553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14973545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048694886","doi":"10.1111/jols.12242","title":"Ultimate Legality: Reading the Community of Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Deconstruction (building); Reading (process); Sociology; Close reading; Revelation; Philosophy; Law; Art history; History; Art; Literature; Political science","score_opus":0.06442069850302223,"score_gpt":0.33112965003835515,"score_spread":0.2667089515353329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048694886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043164134,0.02070856,0.012392245,0.20378914,0.005727291,0.000081515216,0.00006950179,0.00016840595,0.7138992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9098555,0.005103947,0.0031808326,0.013158943,0.0022178076,0.0000997913,0.00007151875,0.00021872281,0.0660929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922941,0.0056934627,0.00010340231,0.00047232365,0.00093829725,0.0004984319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887476,0.0072556464,0.00046402754,0.0006980912,0.0016015334,0.001233054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056658927,0.00044797856,0.0005384137,0.002208679,0.016219253,0.019096807,0.0014236206,0.00454848,0.008804852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016101357,0.00027693648,0.00027117608,0.0014856735,0.037932593,0.01678638,0.0067429994,0.0072071296,0.0011429797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014667792,0.000023217128,0.00024272186,0.000065619985,0.0000030808496,0.00025143317,0.13433225,0.00008368658,0.00012979271,0.8028866,0.050004225,0.0119627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009362531,0.00002290051,0.00029397308,0.00063669373,0.0000046290997,0.00020027961,0.10568609,0.00028124076,0.00023532499,0.3440052,0.5486051,0.000019376412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01084162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016610218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019096807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008517108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007124447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06179619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081441212","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3676084","title":"Introduction to the Edward Elgar Research Handbook on Law and Emotion","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02553783482327385,"score_gpt":0.3209458370355222,"score_spread":0.29540800221224833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081441212","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008963296,0.42379338,0.02747435,0.056406364,0.010554484,0.00011506855,0.0022735056,0.0006804306,0.47780618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018719682,0.41270468,0.018261628,0.02216788,0.015513305,0.0004692222,0.0014536117,0.0007432299,0.50996685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993649,0.00018454356,0.00006629037,0.000078807316,0.0002556793,0.000049848553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654895,0.0025730466,0.000108446206,0.00016570139,0.00046451035,0.00013935038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011757963,0.0011821525,0.0012495082,0.0041538114,0.0014003163,0.0060854307,0.0014419113,0.0023967559,0.078791566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040054354,0.0005453019,0.00073668436,0.005459244,0.0039918367,0.006674708,0.001718065,0.004794855,0.030389054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017869186,0.000053881482,0.00019373292,0.0007878087,0.000008396823,0.00006002339,0.001218615,0.00016255818,0.00018219235,0.20920229,0.6256607,0.16245192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034176767,0.0000088000725,0.00038888238,0.00088797265,0.000003444216,0.00013591234,0.0005312858,0.000059300502,0.00005312277,0.07540907,0.9225042,0.000014710304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038915793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007953446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078791566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022010878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002583562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26358402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082748882","doi":"","title":"The closure factor: an autoethnographical analysis of the justness of restorative justice after murder","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Restorative justice; Closure (psychology); Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.019878868734082157,"score_gpt":0.276877845614307,"score_spread":0.2569989768802248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082748882","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97898644,0.0004354672,0.005083108,0.0019069482,0.00012242336,0.00015867587,0.00013774922,0.000041367897,0.013127811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990892,0.00060821924,0.0018638985,0.00049691374,0.00004652852,0.00013738475,0.0001207976,0.00008432365,0.005749951],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938514,0.004807805,0.00012905388,0.00036746747,0.0004133641,0.00043086178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98988426,0.0080266,0.00068040355,0.00048737277,0.0005159569,0.00040537684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047043073,0.0005201934,0.0005412976,0.0021005725,0.0065779956,0.0044060242,0.00097654015,0.0012631514,0.0016978307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016484378,0.00038380918,0.00030474516,0.0017608653,0.00800265,0.0036861536,0.004397987,0.0028301792,0.00029377363],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018041219,0.000040179977,0.0016378639,0.000045238852,0.0000032053385,0.00038506178,0.99059,0.000021498814,0.0006077437,0.0015362459,0.00048910733,0.004625847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027616597,0.000041281717,0.004604255,0.00014445058,0.000005829742,0.00040603257,0.97655016,0.00013743654,0.0004974063,0.0009855744,0.01660968,0.000014991497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056739016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011801137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065779956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030150283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002192535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024879098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084422841","doi":"10.29173/mlj1207","title":"Mr. Big and the New Common Law Confessions Rule: Five Years in Review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Rule of law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.03631706477280212,"score_gpt":0.2989385078672648,"score_spread":0.26262144309446267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084422841","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004425366,0.9532338,0.000036415884,0.03964033,0.006708065,0.000005298846,0.0000149594935,0.0000034777104,0.00031339313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019507824,0.9167858,0.00019879734,0.061849654,0.018043552,0.000034969114,0.00005184583,0.000012529891,0.0010721044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891465,0.002943522,0.0015754104,0.0007641351,0.0047870846,0.00078326795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9032603,0.040127806,0.010802374,0.0018696368,0.03776724,0.0061726477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018955301,0.0010438598,0.0035022886,0.0072025964,0.0020837798,0.007925207,0.0033063893,0.011008876,0.0038388732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08023271,0.0010247857,0.0014273965,0.008370114,0.0071046078,0.014308797,0.0036401106,0.011601528,0.0017915093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010331356,0.000030055438,0.0006146036,0.011638145,0.0002961463,0.00013885016,0.00047457204,0.00009855758,0.000100657795,0.012478085,0.812183,0.16184397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034264216,0.000050985316,0.0012044441,0.03469523,0.0002182475,0.00030417574,0.0005779278,0.000045961617,0.000051999294,0.0036172874,0.9591511,0.000048489757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033279944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06074901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033279944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011157326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04641441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10024643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087268678","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6420","title":"Access To Justice, Moral Distance And Changing Demands On Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Solidarity; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Multiculturalism; Relation (database); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.06517805478586225,"score_gpt":0.3489909168456595,"score_spread":0.2838128620597973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087268678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36754352,0.006460462,0.008457966,0.027149405,0.00028903986,0.000030211993,0.000050604252,0.000023821718,0.5899949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936627,0.0007469436,0.00038782068,0.0004531232,0.00006158968,0.000010211566,0.000008402722,0.000008136621,0.0046610264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99502134,0.0021212061,0.00018168484,0.00048637707,0.0012670824,0.00092225306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99571997,0.0024177723,0.00052273733,0.0003889043,0.00034853758,0.0006021566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030089726,0.00017684948,0.00039075137,0.0012635166,0.005388111,0.010780402,0.00086163636,0.0024172878,0.00433747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075684795,0.00015611717,0.00017701702,0.0012015519,0.042922787,0.012681745,0.008028766,0.0041362853,0.00025665015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009413653,0.000020624664,0.0006372613,0.000021572203,0.000001963601,0.00010809509,0.017078526,0.00009692234,0.00013396371,0.97534615,0.00042372892,0.006121715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008812402,0.00003808292,0.003964976,0.0001386193,0.0000036852332,0.00022449937,0.030985713,0.00029414578,0.00015101323,0.916793,0.047374267,0.000023249226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005158311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005164847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010780402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004143675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002597751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030064583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089219159","doi":"","title":"Justice at the Edge: Hearing the Sound of Silence","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of New South Wales","keywords":"Personhood; Silence; Sociology; Economic Justice; Mainstream; Aotearoa; Law; Environmental ethics; Political science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.039662476757472566,"score_gpt":0.23184143444010252,"score_spread":0.19217895768262996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089219159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1922736,0.013828704,0.016369818,0.3336881,0.004225605,0.000054689852,0.00010389363,0.00022304078,0.4392326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.959391,0.0017522615,0.0006193787,0.019686867,0.00068580563,0.000022478549,0.000018391776,0.00009273618,0.017731264],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887765,0.0053196666,0.00024128194,0.0008753188,0.0024462694,0.0023408844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989578,0.0063785347,0.00082776917,0.000513175,0.00132205,0.0013805234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007324165,0.00035789204,0.0006769555,0.0012715947,0.022424454,0.013915164,0.0018989977,0.007404854,0.008911805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022408063,0.00031456628,0.0005031953,0.0007928515,0.050465822,0.013860598,0.015112739,0.010696098,0.0012921066],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005635284,0.000017727592,0.0014165618,0.00016366107,0.000015249456,0.0014866762,0.5824169,0.0000787804,0.00087514863,0.3637815,0.018697936,0.03099349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001801958,0.00007873453,0.001783693,0.000936959,0.00003076973,0.0010661817,0.49641535,0.00025806652,0.00089225994,0.15751131,0.3409289,0.000079810605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037524384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04245801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037524384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008135687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009404466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0746119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091364628","doi":"10.35502/jcswb.125","title":"Community praxis: Exploring a community engagement framework for restorative justice in British Columbia, Nova Scotia, and Bangladesh","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Simon Fraser University; Dalhousie University","keywords":"Nova scotia; Restorative justice; Praxis; Community engagement; Creativity; Qualitative research; Sociology; Community participation; Economic Justice; Environmental justice; Community psychology; Community organization; Community building; Community development; Public relations; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Social science; Socioeconomics; Social psychology; Ethnology","score_opus":0.08735426971407664,"score_gpt":0.32077658544892534,"score_spread":0.2334223157348487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091364628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9287642,0.0005114064,0.0025883545,0.006301905,0.000030419142,0.00040813742,0.00012362015,0.000020266936,0.061251584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99459803,0.00026041284,0.0011371545,0.00021485526,0.000002156217,0.00016455451,0.0000405365,0.0000060302946,0.0035762745],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809116,0.0010848624,0.000046655365,0.00012429192,0.00018878924,0.00046422775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996705,0.0012633231,0.00018444509,0.00012461911,0.00062471605,0.0010979746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002453902,0.00035619776,0.0002979536,0.0015351722,0.011948352,0.004480674,0.0011620047,0.0008178709,0.0036940407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035472836,0.00018280359,0.0001365407,0.00205579,0.0090177655,0.001644491,0.0058027054,0.0018063172,0.00016879819],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005052774,0.00012361277,0.02869446,0.00024618805,0.000012883006,0.0020972306,0.89643115,0.00033665908,0.0014132331,0.022247108,0.0030784667,0.04526852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006304803,0.000024772951,0.0122907525,0.00013729029,0.0000036907452,0.00008669787,0.96762586,0.0001970315,0.00007221695,0.0015789625,0.0179613,0.00001509779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7622494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91264474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23775059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03563682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041831963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47830147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091907905","doi":"10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11146","title":"NOVEL, EDUCATIONAL AND LEGAL RESPONSES TO TECHNOLOGY-FACILITATED SEXUAL VIOLENCE","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Sociology; Public relations; Agency (philosophy); Media studies; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.046659819081805,"score_gpt":0.3716967643303461,"score_spread":0.3250369452485411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091907905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4276347,0.009230594,0.012310786,0.15026456,0.009318881,0.00061006454,0.00067188905,0.00033028895,0.3896282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.919489,0.004086459,0.0018851283,0.008490059,0.0008429858,0.0003037149,0.00013828855,0.00010331408,0.064660974],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939737,0.0037762073,0.00012602132,0.00042615572,0.00093741925,0.0007604633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929007,0.0046536583,0.00040572317,0.0004722112,0.0004329889,0.0011346815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042195613,0.00079469674,0.00045653887,0.0020863118,0.024833983,0.013565194,0.0023990485,0.0049138083,0.011681454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011898417,0.0003715278,0.0006175958,0.0017194542,0.027987985,0.005384029,0.011510536,0.008146375,0.001040208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044201934,0.00012178025,0.0010273808,0.00021406307,0.000011008482,0.0026536898,0.8728404,0.00013000221,0.00072811125,0.07594866,0.030996755,0.01528405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015683649,0.000054502943,0.0017560181,0.0003975042,0.000010887031,0.0013731963,0.57886666,0.00019109366,0.0007219943,0.009081343,0.40749764,0.00003350184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03209627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.070097975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03209627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010499049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008196825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076176286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091932048","doi":"","title":"Tzitzis, Stamatios. La personne, l'humanisme, le droit. Quebec, Université Laval, 2001, 150 p","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revista de estudios histórico-jurídicos","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01327214298321922,"score_gpt":0.24374452014939865,"score_spread":0.23047237716617944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091932048","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006240458,0.9422156,0.00069421163,0.024664244,0.0033330484,0.000016301456,0.0013787738,0.00012709499,0.026946666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023957096,0.8413134,0.0011566497,0.0027713897,0.0021665313,0.00007718638,0.0013479794,0.00030002798,0.1269097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951184,0.00007819912,0.000044335044,0.000070835646,0.00020889044,0.00008587584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843866,0.0004771135,0.000089769645,0.000063217485,0.0007596295,0.00017169288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010144182,0.002606814,0.0017121931,0.006773462,0.006882725,0.0067107826,0.0022446571,0.0036304095,0.05393087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018821359,0.0014357235,0.00071354775,0.018424395,0.003218024,0.007376383,0.0014416924,0.004201755,0.018160256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033858385,0.000024104216,0.0009511493,0.00065694866,0.000024479248,0.00011513633,0.0026100208,0.00025727597,0.00014446567,0.015366681,0.8796381,0.10017781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017395518,0.000009612841,0.010937005,0.00246213,0.000035816214,0.00022924114,0.0038819078,0.00018724432,0.00019541054,0.0047177216,0.97729194,0.000034578923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8160286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89550775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1839714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018743526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013582764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37010968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W309358863","doi":"","title":"Natalka Husar and Diana Thorneycroft versus the Law: A Critical Feminist Consideration of Intellectual Property and Artistic Practice","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Intellectual property; Humanities; Sociology; Art; Art history; Political science; Law; Visual arts","score_opus":0.027834485741440405,"score_gpt":0.277762047454148,"score_spread":0.2499275617127076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W309358863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14188564,0.046306666,0.0044634216,0.25627103,0.00075090874,0.000049025046,0.000052699725,0.000023316326,0.55019724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9530007,0.010597149,0.00078810076,0.0046912897,0.0002776866,0.000034768258,0.000008618725,0.000026113583,0.030575624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964792,0.0020560536,0.00006166749,0.00020625954,0.0007101179,0.00048668316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99470574,0.004308936,0.0002543582,0.00014248418,0.00035748596,0.00023096584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004666232,0.0003552479,0.00035884368,0.0016727056,0.01870748,0.010669706,0.0011911023,0.003939849,0.0037302915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005498479,0.00025076015,0.00017926386,0.0016761244,0.06515238,0.007848474,0.0033682447,0.0037481685,0.000245102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011952979,0.000011836174,0.00028279482,0.00006134665,0.0000018906371,0.00029908933,0.13368407,0.000082511026,0.00012914771,0.85353947,0.0053232703,0.0065726214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017001687,0.000026663363,0.002333696,0.00065196544,0.000011588429,0.00039080487,0.36464864,0.00028886346,0.0007649002,0.24530762,0.3855163,0.000041880205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14738433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24157108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14738433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016428994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017544372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29305297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094345297","doi":"10.1332/263169020x16014084980811","title":"‘Now, the question here is who to believe’: criminalising HIV nondisclosure, emotions and determinations of credibility in R. v. T.S.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emotions and Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Psychology; Disgust; Indignation; Feeling; Social psychology; Anger; Morality; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03251347251863089,"score_gpt":0.32020533343352026,"score_spread":0.28769186091488935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094345297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8913646,0.0021805693,0.0019957793,0.047514327,0.00035878812,0.00003255608,0.00001762872,0.00001812622,0.05651765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951988,0.000369832,0.00029916855,0.0025919585,0.000061398474,0.0000066558523,0.0000056568833,0.000009345785,0.001457276],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430966,0.0037401533,0.00011900348,0.00025404143,0.0010464714,0.00053062494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989961,0.0054301927,0.0024692207,0.0003176757,0.0010528781,0.0007690425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051009124,0.00022804787,0.00032027753,0.000390713,0.0056338944,0.0074589094,0.0005604434,0.0033864216,0.0014082756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032509066,0.00029272604,0.00025009422,0.00028556885,0.022161376,0.0055973753,0.0031768763,0.008020996,0.00037247664],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008384234,0.00004049161,0.010917394,0.000058433954,0.00002229154,0.0010733549,0.9470921,0.00010130161,0.0014247728,0.022326961,0.0033227259,0.013536271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000137427605,0.00014893041,0.028106134,0.0004281788,0.000029826448,0.0016392902,0.9133799,0.0005440229,0.00085254444,0.024675759,0.030081732,0.00009998171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012785432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013280166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012785432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019563334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018578203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026976466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094605268","doi":"10.53637/qkqa5656","title":"‘The Torment of Our Powerlessness’: Addressing Indigenous Constitutional Vulnerability through the Uluru Statement’s Call for a First Nations Voice in Their Affairs","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New South Wales Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Legislature; Politics; Sociology; Political science; Constitutional right; Public administration; Constitution","score_opus":0.045969804797485234,"score_gpt":0.30106419337824414,"score_spread":0.2550943885807589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094605268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19887719,0.010444991,0.027581234,0.31839094,0.0027111915,0.0001676662,0.000039642215,0.00014550821,0.44164166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.939076,0.0012546579,0.006417801,0.023311887,0.00032979585,0.00008901681,0.000014797021,0.000052467654,0.029453646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822062,0.012229979,0.000554726,0.00086093094,0.002625592,0.0015225384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912141,0.005987664,0.00048568516,0.00083727884,0.0008361426,0.00063922466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016315091,0.00023778374,0.0003917304,0.0006754607,0.008148144,0.008444018,0.0014318369,0.0066459402,0.0019813464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022458058,0.0003237305,0.000341337,0.000476577,0.02897458,0.006329113,0.0057379324,0.0073778457,0.00027981107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000086410055,0.000009738896,0.0003874974,0.00006749299,0.000004772494,0.0002742914,0.06950714,0.00017916544,0.0005024712,0.91132545,0.0060966955,0.011636568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018401537,0.00011205951,0.003201176,0.00062042265,0.000026806349,0.00058252946,0.059210945,0.001091897,0.0020609188,0.27011284,0.66283816,0.00012387378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016621657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02742455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016621657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060191434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012830844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086283445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3098533712","doi":"10.22215/cjcr.v7i1.2805","title":"Images of Justice","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01568946785565845,"score_gpt":0.23469376379656803,"score_spread":0.2190042959409096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3098533712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019606405,0.001677582,0.00028837583,0.02472015,0.002020804,0.000011197124,0.000068240326,0.00003538162,0.96921766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15937778,0.0016568814,0.00039482044,0.01623413,0.0011485548,0.00004528085,0.00007753015,0.0001377884,0.82092726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832064,0.000505566,0.000035764308,0.0001777458,0.0005491239,0.0004110968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990747,0.00017725027,0.00006750748,0.00009548958,0.0003304909,0.0002544903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010703008,0.0004125784,0.00028984537,0.0011030623,0.012369772,0.010237009,0.0008170035,0.0034280708,0.050463747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039518923,0.00019485531,0.00026024375,0.00087368937,0.010438016,0.0045414316,0.0034427794,0.005151484,0.007004299],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011977117,0.000012294762,0.00016351219,0.000027238493,0.000002288872,0.00014110412,0.01167856,0.000017274091,0.00010213232,0.73043895,0.2447791,0.012625486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000185055,0.0000025595546,0.00020160673,0.000044749882,0.0000011108685,0.00007145278,0.0057210713,0.00001593956,0.00004336431,0.014954561,0.978937,0.0000047405897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09008157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18067008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09008157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009668824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0079610795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17911446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100784630","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.85","title":"Punishment for the Crimes against Person According the Criminal Code of Poland","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Kazan Federal University","keywords":"Criminal code; Legislator; Sanctions; Russian federation; Legislation; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminal procedure; Punishment (psychology); Relevance (law); Criminology; Theory of criminal justice; Criminal justice; Psychology; Business; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12484552735093411,"score_gpt":0.3678660414373305,"score_spread":0.24302051408639636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100784630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7998855,0.0013067275,0.0059711807,0.0037082639,0.00022653725,0.00033451186,0.0005029329,0.00006209874,0.18800214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98753965,0.0006239278,0.0017557838,0.00047491078,0.000028856964,0.00011078359,0.00016764076,0.0000092547125,0.009289218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955597,0.00106849,0.0005228663,0.0003726241,0.0015760228,0.00090025016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971788,0.00035687612,0.0013405656,0.00025036812,0.0006466079,0.00022691838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011171817,0.00024886258,0.0002296131,0.001338662,0.0020375592,0.0018947662,0.00038080587,0.0006472181,0.0011919786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008563669,0.00017922747,0.00016973364,0.0010427813,0.0023533918,0.0012113618,0.0021764785,0.0012957754,0.00036085397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013732766,0.0001750109,0.18308342,0.00034383574,0.00008192276,0.0015112233,0.029140977,0.0010635806,0.0031848531,0.58416224,0.03110891,0.16600667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043743363,0.00021966272,0.6123852,0.0008399199,0.00007667798,0.0044479542,0.024996996,0.0027333088,0.0025442506,0.046363477,0.3051839,0.00016497147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011839535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016369646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011839535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016815932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038253395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023541272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102011194","doi":"10.1017/lsi.2020.18","title":"Building the Aboriginal Conference Settlement Suite: Hope and Realism in Law as a Tool for Social Change","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Social Inquiry","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Indigenous; Settlement (finance); Economic Justice; Mainstream; Sociology; Criminal law; Government (linguistics); Legal history; Political science","score_opus":0.12239802823930127,"score_gpt":0.40143435616129747,"score_spread":0.2790363279219962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102011194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1336443,0.008262999,0.025618143,0.32479608,0.0018777719,0.00023147077,0.000059291757,0.00017059609,0.5053394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9668756,0.0010520602,0.005005814,0.0055396473,0.00014665611,0.00009043152,0.000015519938,0.00005595963,0.02121833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98463374,0.011435492,0.00013049526,0.0006279521,0.0015542837,0.001617973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99284184,0.003323859,0.00051502883,0.00077301095,0.0007771058,0.0017691182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019141477,0.0004811709,0.00045015613,0.0021426883,0.04179909,0.024629485,0.003508955,0.0050720973,0.005769963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011420002,0.00045337388,0.00060079404,0.0011188495,0.11452525,0.011954078,0.01512089,0.009230139,0.0005384871],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011368235,0.000023038367,0.00044915636,0.000046216042,0.0000048305274,0.0002641187,0.19801566,0.00019280521,0.00014554587,0.78948617,0.0056702574,0.0056908545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022789714,0.000055573833,0.0012909789,0.00035443107,0.000015847078,0.0002189753,0.3843472,0.0008109503,0.0004599649,0.2862695,0.32609636,0.000057421774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21412148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33577856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21412148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03743411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039079394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42575026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3105148433","doi":"10.1017/cls.2020.17","title":"Trans Rights Are Not Just Human Rights: Legal Strategies for Trans Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Human rights; Political science; Law; Jurisprudence; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Legal realism; Legal research; Right to property","score_opus":0.033311137879299554,"score_gpt":0.286960927746277,"score_spread":0.25364978986697745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3105148433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028366191,0.0036370573,0.031128632,0.308189,0.0007625326,0.00012712568,0.000036217443,0.000114128954,0.62763906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9205937,0.0015542054,0.011142567,0.021892251,0.00016945034,0.00009152876,0.000027940023,0.000086052794,0.044442285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98614174,0.006729713,0.0003020325,0.0010008374,0.0027849216,0.0030407545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870275,0.0040103574,0.00073019415,0.0011476506,0.003776433,0.0033078243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020616537,0.0005021928,0.00046533594,0.002368607,0.029229932,0.018700076,0.002794002,0.008972263,0.011813426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016190927,0.00030930614,0.00054864207,0.0015063982,0.075349204,0.015957423,0.015003744,0.010189145,0.0013232008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034255456,0.000011739461,0.00024190634,0.000022765505,0.0000021840374,0.00015431488,0.024965158,0.00005694257,0.00013149361,0.9610486,0.0062592677,0.0071021584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010622505,0.000020330612,0.00078251155,0.00049984356,0.00001297407,0.00035782676,0.10735275,0.00048748814,0.0004467851,0.5752098,0.31477606,0.000043073658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29336858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36591554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7066314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025881981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06256227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5833219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3106597074","doi":"10.31542/cb.v2i1.1994","title":"SENICIDE AS A MODERN PROBLEM IN INDIA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crossing Borders Student Reflections on Global Social Issues","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Anomie; Tamil; Chatterjee; Sociology; Social science; Social issues; Perspective (graphical); Criminology; Structural functionalism; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.0388490619262986,"score_gpt":0.44965812251840276,"score_spread":0.41080906059210415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3106597074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5741845,0.017010992,0.0011682163,0.055721734,0.0005856808,0.00003087942,0.000043142853,0.00007065606,0.3511842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99047285,0.0039350386,0.00018679538,0.001761659,0.00010734482,0.000008194592,0.000009963231,0.000009427171,0.003508804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812275,0.00081438874,0.000060506525,0.00013943328,0.00028182584,0.0005810131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880993,0.0004216977,0.0003064112,0.00013116641,0.00015294713,0.00017790533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010097928,0.000268137,0.00022788094,0.0012963581,0.014009159,0.007936031,0.0012564264,0.0026444937,0.0019271519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015950568,0.00030115334,0.00025604694,0.0028190194,0.029158346,0.0029419356,0.0067942976,0.0054634367,0.00021067967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017937822,0.000043609347,0.00592855,0.00017956043,0.000013179768,0.003799692,0.23439986,0.0002884716,0.00037034834,0.7269831,0.0070882477,0.020887619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010255876,0.000112745656,0.024353458,0.0006472509,0.00004149394,0.00898948,0.4552106,0.0003415642,0.00049523,0.10901396,0.40067825,0.000105697894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028185453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032294396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028185453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076467814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00614361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05604279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W31068621","doi":"10.1038/s41598-019-43500-3","title":"Gli studiosi di diritto amministrativo (1976-2000)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rivista trimestrale di diritto pubblico","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Chemistry","score_opus":0.02917596785472475,"score_gpt":0.3138668338381229,"score_spread":0.28469086598339816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W31068621","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025202697,0.44208038,0.007018745,0.025627924,0.055366956,0.00030637594,0.0033027611,0.0005715908,0.44052255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16320992,0.1807768,0.007905857,0.0033510097,0.034092102,0.0005449295,0.003994445,0.0007947551,0.60533017],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988171,0.00022191866,0.00009756198,0.0003972718,0.0002994835,0.00016676384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868363,0.00027386288,0.00016618276,0.00015182875,0.00045982611,0.00026472335],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016720338,0.0014335227,0.0006921224,0.0050490852,0.0014714132,0.0030497191,0.0008289922,0.0013474218,0.032842014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025898116,0.00042903156,0.00046123596,0.003389089,0.0010846825,0.0019329378,0.002429462,0.0017820616,0.020840107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004223842,0.0002168008,0.0039625494,0.0018780736,0.000036028017,0.0004894939,0.0017131899,0.0005885652,0.0028210396,0.051440287,0.4169646,0.519467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007736046,0.000050060436,0.0030005828,0.00030836707,0.000008154936,0.00022522568,0.00007009793,0.000093524846,0.0007210501,0.0014237199,0.9940832,0.000008152571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034601763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004727938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033456087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019793052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10986745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3107412128","doi":"10.1353/gpr.2020.0020","title":"Aboriginal Peoples and the Law: A Critical Introduction by Jim Reynolds","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Great Plains research","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Honor; Common law; Legislation; Political science; History","score_opus":0.046790932106773694,"score_gpt":0.41003277534747273,"score_spread":0.363241843240699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3107412128","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015345899,0.5917402,0.00048695315,0.28996783,0.046215877,0.00014944456,0.000098276374,0.000049537448,0.06975731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036014866,0.5839431,0.0019003416,0.08927921,0.042362764,0.00033562462,0.00028437245,0.00014613236,0.24573357],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970162,0.0012464228,0.000122068675,0.00026405358,0.00093844143,0.00041281324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968093,0.0013407323,0.00012978593,0.00006473025,0.0012320734,0.00042349298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035011617,0.0013895504,0.0009115639,0.0030434174,0.011199809,0.007938223,0.0019463236,0.006302238,0.009323061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005317615,0.00079596654,0.0006114921,0.003571125,0.0072489455,0.0073254234,0.0041101244,0.009591067,0.002274587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000114563645,0.00003995706,0.0001860853,0.00043359518,0.000005208961,0.000277412,0.014569532,0.00009650341,0.000096577256,0.030471696,0.93181235,0.021999625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022802096,0.000008517819,0.00048567483,0.0011845712,0.0000032502562,0.00013255847,0.008843788,0.000023253193,0.000021433021,0.0035855738,0.9856926,0.000016532958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1586032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17306705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1586032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016168892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019334856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110655836","doi":"","title":"Leaving the Classroom Behind? Lessons Learned from Designing an Online Law and Film Webinar Series","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Series (stratigraphy); Law; Computer science; Sociology; Public relations; Mathematics education; Political science; Psychology; Geology","score_opus":0.0792307952666896,"score_gpt":0.31715420803173905,"score_spread":0.23792341276504947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110655836","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3492172,0.00089139125,0.3946911,0.028478522,0.0012834631,0.005551153,0.00026928107,0.004558092,0.21505976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5075371,0.0007987774,0.38695028,0.0024768263,0.00019198119,0.001807718,0.0002833115,0.0018642119,0.09808979],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868187,0.0095997,0.0004052611,0.001045039,0.0010869221,0.001044383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770303,0.013931683,0.00049305015,0.0014766896,0.0030991805,0.003969146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016280744,0.0009880004,0.0006194394,0.0013026927,0.008067942,0.016680198,0.0030534938,0.0026275506,0.015760422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029102765,0.0010507245,0.00050974166,0.00072744396,0.003730363,0.01286164,0.0050500096,0.0046025,0.0055797906],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023284648,0.008668422,0.011791308,0.0011071921,0.00004033876,0.0035861055,0.29993698,0.005742942,0.013331615,0.06512647,0.07116169,0.5192742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016018418,0.0016112729,0.0049282573,0.001136351,0.000099684636,0.0012442714,0.36314392,0.0133660715,0.016422775,0.03671859,0.5609423,0.00022627194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038197197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012807449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016680198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039629135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074759265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08610183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111419258","doi":"10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.168","title":"The Concept of Violence and its Expression in Criminal Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Criminology and Sociology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Legislation; Value (mathematics); Law; Expression (computer science); Criminal responsibility; Identification (biology); Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06255016284143049,"score_gpt":0.3534995129218875,"score_spread":0.290949350080457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111419258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.118273,0.031968508,0.07275412,0.02460441,0.0008764158,0.00013952407,0.00014944214,0.000051483592,0.7511831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98300534,0.0036661928,0.0053431457,0.00087489677,0.00025332038,0.000088227345,0.000038672835,0.00001814531,0.0067120437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897182,0.007273322,0.0004095438,0.00061660836,0.0013913079,0.00059110683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615365,0.0023355032,0.00064604357,0.00034416953,0.00030266546,0.0002179633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033106992,0.00045107087,0.00045543877,0.0025470816,0.0040698205,0.007196765,0.001270329,0.002351316,0.0023296857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063571334,0.00023880407,0.00046961196,0.0026211643,0.04772484,0.0062683015,0.0051212334,0.0035688062,0.00028339794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026221323,0.000004159412,0.0002841148,0.00002139468,0.0000016783008,0.000046109282,0.0050151497,0.000060007274,0.00004533269,0.9918413,0.00026317252,0.0024149665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051814313,0.000031393825,0.0021106678,0.00029564265,0.000008292183,0.00055315986,0.008317616,0.00051374506,0.00018653278,0.9354554,0.052500427,0.00002192675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002620556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015896851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007196765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038701482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024231672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028079987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111856209","doi":"10.7551/mitpress/12847.001.0001","title":"Owning the Street","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"The MIT Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Melbourne; Princeton University","keywords":"Lease; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Media studies; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Art; Social science","score_opus":0.05140998919985464,"score_gpt":0.28191595234927136,"score_spread":0.2305059631494167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111856209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03873839,0.0014352495,0.003795632,0.014612386,0.001028324,0.00002995947,0.00014634518,0.00017725374,0.94003654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6085676,0.0019977628,0.0023969153,0.0047111786,0.00028237756,0.0000376381,0.00022563097,0.00024521013,0.38153562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990344,0.00040341003,0.000020652484,0.00019393212,0.00015327388,0.00019440209],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995552,0.00006675906,0.00003856929,0.00008521807,0.00009230779,0.00016183953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054040394,0.00036611108,0.00018561665,0.0006590874,0.008468282,0.0085631665,0.00059979764,0.0015411283,0.036892273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013402732,0.00019389213,0.00034741833,0.00059690676,0.009774802,0.006383032,0.005243946,0.0023593104,0.005159635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002787797,0.000026680693,0.0022539215,0.00007727113,0.000007998035,0.00058196683,0.13454549,0.000119748714,0.00040776556,0.715923,0.105291076,0.040737204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032021128,0.00001487502,0.00093863637,0.000084389416,0.000004471281,0.00027665397,0.052405532,0.00007693914,0.00012637605,0.015730755,0.93032753,0.000010529365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012914035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03722013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036892273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030168707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001631677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1234169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112262330","doi":"10.1017/cls.2020.10","title":"Trans Justice and the Law: From Then to Now, From There to Here: A Conversation between Dr. Viviane Namaste and Dalia Tourki","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Presentation (obstetrics); General partnership; Economic Justice; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Political science; Medicine; Communication","score_opus":0.021525297151730474,"score_gpt":0.2555138317125167,"score_spread":0.23398853456078622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112262330","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014440824,0.017958589,0.0006812599,0.930599,0.004644644,0.000033929806,0.00004243775,0.000030648465,0.031568788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4724738,0.020126682,0.002126659,0.4211425,0.0021727853,0.00023486857,0.000054486874,0.00028104003,0.08138721],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876457,0.0079208845,0.000256982,0.00075533584,0.0016407691,0.0017803272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873883,0.006836034,0.0004518504,0.00028888736,0.0014098466,0.0036250926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012168409,0.000624091,0.0010373559,0.0011103796,0.033268496,0.018385543,0.0022748185,0.011792265,0.0052195517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019771883,0.00077395403,0.00050292554,0.0015345416,0.027240684,0.016622648,0.009795382,0.035787597,0.0010048542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032671705,0.00003966328,0.0003932644,0.00017658755,0.0000079192305,0.0013012303,0.68294656,0.00005746402,0.00045689894,0.07048571,0.23405287,0.01004906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005440903,0.000014795635,0.00037963456,0.00030032854,0.0000030979163,0.000470253,0.39938983,0.00005282492,0.00013012979,0.0047165477,0.59449613,0.000040855564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10814288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17632416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10814288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022465978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01951637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21502686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113145846","doi":"10.1017/cls.2020.27","title":"<i>Trans Justice and the Law : From Then to Now, From There to Here,</i>Une conversation entre Viviane Namaste, Ph. D., et Dalia Tourki","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Humanities; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Communication","score_opus":0.015622060998510908,"score_gpt":0.24139528029010282,"score_spread":0.22577321929159191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113145846","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008788697,0.021553447,0.0007445353,0.8692527,0.0069583394,0.00002853015,0.00015350939,0.000030218771,0.09248999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4427479,0.031199249,0.0016340938,0.3158695,0.0040717577,0.0002188854,0.00018758648,0.00026808603,0.20380294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681324,0.0015147078,0.000117818214,0.00038565128,0.0006527003,0.0005159346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99584866,0.0022610289,0.00031103456,0.00012454258,0.0007470185,0.0007076755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002672659,0.0003501312,0.00040132206,0.0007094311,0.016020253,0.014085847,0.0012829688,0.006376253,0.0086382795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009024488,0.00030696657,0.0002703371,0.0016254544,0.015027679,0.00845939,0.0038784812,0.015502636,0.0015252257],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002717051,0.00001546379,0.0007643077,0.00030340886,0.000005248776,0.00045544395,0.33089352,0.000027820966,0.0004569632,0.15385766,0.498947,0.014245972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022263846,0.0000047147937,0.00096820534,0.00036831014,0.000002197301,0.00016614865,0.12112418,0.00002129099,0.00010804573,0.0030741433,0.8741454,0.000015195567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18647459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32729328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18647459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017473329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014367305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37077838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3116019321","doi":"10.22215/etd/2020-13891","title":"Mad and/or bad? Jurors' attitudes towards women and men who plead insanity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Jury; Affect (linguistics); Deliberation; Insanity; Thematic analysis; Vignette; Content analysis; Qualitative research; Psychiatry; Law","score_opus":0.022068217839006598,"score_gpt":0.3214908100686391,"score_spread":0.2994225922296325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3116019321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920803,0.0002713698,0.00009119158,0.0015279503,0.000053738215,0.0000178795,0.000026499743,0.0000027104209,0.0059284656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99572754,0.0003827982,0.00009904049,0.0007500971,0.000035372017,0.000021899923,0.00002834301,0.0000030671877,0.0029518625],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987947,0.0006481728,0.00007285459,0.00007004921,0.00024679909,0.0001673933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720037,0.00087914406,0.0010785755,0.0000991972,0.00027691448,0.00046588553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022890293,0.00018943778,0.00027243627,0.000812954,0.0016833489,0.002082487,0.0001533324,0.0006784678,0.0043300255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010221633,0.00020410154,0.00027990498,0.00038110785,0.001462071,0.0011419626,0.000989222,0.0012222892,0.00078078255],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039455784,0.0005055677,0.74565065,0.000119129945,0.00009799578,0.00053225853,0.19147448,0.000071047,0.0033599825,0.00224442,0.006583567,0.04896636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022359414,0.00041427257,0.60127497,0.00020371198,0.00006714048,0.0006150932,0.3854644,0.00018772422,0.0010178118,0.0007583315,0.009932903,0.000041231753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035660246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008065798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043300255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000592847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043941755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014485419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117153106","doi":"10.1093/owc/9780199554829.003.0012","title":"The Events of Ten Weeks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Mile; History; Horizon; Art; Archaeology; Geography; Geodesy; Physics; Astronomy","score_opus":0.019975483439528395,"score_gpt":0.22859033428233938,"score_spread":0.20861485084281098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117153106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005457395,0.00274772,0.0024408016,0.014987171,0.014421725,0.00015241843,0.0014800181,0.00045239835,0.9578604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035454158,0.00073232513,0.00033283795,0.0031368493,0.0010247867,0.000087696084,0.0004989624,0.00018006377,0.95855236],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906975,0.00014703182,0.000028432994,0.00014072488,0.00025739093,0.00035670568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893147,0.00007061151,0.00006805606,0.00012665606,0.00021692662,0.00058614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008762038,0.0005759869,0.00024314245,0.0006598089,0.006139835,0.0048370794,0.0009824174,0.0015844671,0.18529357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002598648,0.00034208514,0.00048508804,0.0006204084,0.0018420962,0.0037292994,0.0058862204,0.0044375365,0.07449562],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012135321,0.000050144252,0.000604015,0.00008318749,0.0000064483247,0.00018697527,0.0040204525,0.00005013966,0.00037637184,0.1596696,0.79200685,0.042824484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020860878,0.0000074306354,0.00034701102,0.0000344382,6.4789987e-7,0.000033357137,0.0007701023,0.0000064166506,0.000036334084,0.0018769458,0.99688184,0.0000034586328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010023397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02149545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18529357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027129685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019266823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61986876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119956392","doi":"10.26180/13377395.v2","title":"Chthonic Legal Traditions towards Emic Understandings of Australian First Nations Constitutionalism: 'Rooted' Constitutionalism and a Foundational Conceptual Apparatus for Inquiries into Australian First Nations Legal Orders","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Emic and etic; Normative; Sociology; Law; Legal pluralism; Constitutional theory; Indigenous; Positivism; Legal positivism; Epistemology; Political science; Constitutional law; Legal realism; Comparative law; Politics; Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08995072105863203,"score_gpt":0.33696944781575705,"score_spread":0.24701872675712502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119956392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35119173,0.0054832445,0.08219924,0.06697034,0.000343873,0.00012977743,0.00013124147,0.0000812389,0.49346924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98281175,0.00067771773,0.007306757,0.0016260318,0.000080215585,0.00007800658,0.000023065873,0.000012492402,0.0073838746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684685,0.001747947,0.00011781051,0.00030634843,0.00068544777,0.00029562137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996461,0.0018132835,0.00047978366,0.000496234,0.00047259018,0.0002771748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004568626,0.00022442962,0.00030760813,0.0016202234,0.0035662283,0.005566825,0.0015360044,0.0024964404,0.002867497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065877116,0.00024147694,0.00030837394,0.0013947781,0.030233258,0.0066228393,0.0039810636,0.0051317466,0.00018639932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018029418,0.000005554013,0.00028082452,0.000019544626,9.4814106e-7,0.000037645277,0.013912002,0.00009474443,0.00006447855,0.98363173,0.00020406386,0.0017467482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056073054,0.00002298548,0.0054165274,0.00020257059,0.0000062522167,0.00012964639,0.012446066,0.0019546521,0.00018642838,0.9325756,0.0470357,0.000017957756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014155714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014155666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014155714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00671379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038633414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048712194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119977540","doi":"10.3138/jcs-2019-0032","title":"I Have A Remember When","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Oppression; Sociology; Reading (process); Oral history; Collective memory; Law; Gay rights; Gender studies; Locale (computer software); History; Media studies; Politics; Political science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.10599008873530308,"score_gpt":0.3302500661408146,"score_spread":0.2242599774055115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119977540","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004548424,0.021322394,0.0018554657,0.6123216,0.083069615,0.00009588423,0.00045148894,0.0008762727,0.2754589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04182614,0.009614352,0.0012927467,0.1829461,0.008900379,0.00006203711,0.00023847888,0.0005273076,0.75459254],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977785,0.00048260795,0.00005213155,0.0003073614,0.0007514275,0.0006280315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941964,0.00034034371,0.00025939723,0.0003660963,0.0023528629,0.0024848853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017174075,0.0009709441,0.0008555077,0.00089231157,0.01707588,0.011021993,0.0017049635,0.00446254,0.09237445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01128319,0.00047632787,0.0005753159,0.0008669309,0.008961944,0.010435598,0.0056377742,0.01230836,0.04646202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012370795,0.0000111362915,0.00031982412,0.000063806416,0.0000051813463,0.00029429738,0.017192971,0.000010311238,0.00013721544,0.010513362,0.95843005,0.01300938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002364347,0.000008560929,0.00029825707,0.00013212074,0.000004257306,0.000170279,0.021175768,0.000006195194,0.000055490935,0.000895779,0.9772346,0.000016393848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12169439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19979376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8783056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007150784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075582643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30902332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120405016","doi":"10.4324/9781315628912-11","title":"Counterdiscourse, seeing anew","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03152101055245047,"score_gpt":0.3229138877323953,"score_spread":0.29139287717994483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120405016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032955958,0.009271167,0.0016285772,0.012970901,0.007397225,0.000021564127,0.00004436629,0.000117824144,0.96525276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08069481,0.0070068487,0.0011186803,0.009119187,0.0015430363,0.00007634625,0.000093091614,0.0002799678,0.90006804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914575,0.00031739214,0.000025818481,0.00015576165,0.00023379273,0.000121396646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995048,0.00017645038,0.00003191618,0.00010480284,0.0001086757,0.0000733745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008235631,0.0005774491,0.00031843156,0.001266278,0.0075516817,0.011049242,0.0010186873,0.002193807,0.044004105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026554035,0.00024358119,0.00030940466,0.00092490145,0.007857937,0.01119511,0.004641848,0.0050637107,0.007943911],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018895491,0.0000211036,0.00007784908,0.00007646451,0.0000019991742,0.00013909701,0.017405227,0.000025913696,0.00023194677,0.82295007,0.12672842,0.032322977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019709823,0.0000046143955,0.00003962144,0.00008779014,0.0000012945238,0.00006601706,0.0045726066,0.000014466413,0.00011021585,0.010288925,0.9848098,0.0000027151686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009240374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017906357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044004105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048600296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030896303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1472084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120635829","doi":"10.3968/11923","title":"A Study on Vagueness Used by the Defendant in Courtroom Discourse from the Perspective of Adaptation Theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vagueness; Politeness; Utterance; Obligation; Credibility; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Law; Psychology; Pragmatics; Linguistics; Computer science; Political science; Philosophy; Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.038906482288128784,"score_gpt":0.31677371931651993,"score_spread":0.27786723702839117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120635829","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663992,0.0005480832,0.008071521,0.0015733871,0.000029889346,0.00004080689,0.000018435852,0.000014616931,0.023304125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984371,0.00012295632,0.00075698877,0.00010479347,0.00001048803,0.000015335083,0.000010343277,0.0000054646807,0.00053656456],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896422,0.0077408785,0.0003914323,0.0005481637,0.0014033271,0.0002740007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796252,0.016215676,0.0019814812,0.0007479562,0.0010399972,0.00038961906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006762176,0.00028446235,0.00039846677,0.0021280725,0.0051347497,0.0043687886,0.00074222806,0.0016165483,0.0013500295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023511052,0.0002901083,0.00032318066,0.0014705292,0.012691188,0.0054487246,0.0042801695,0.0027953614,0.00010105927],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060317863,0.00004301414,0.008732109,0.00010011813,0.000012072113,0.0011000814,0.92641234,0.00020339855,0.0053473515,0.048085153,0.00026050446,0.009643509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018353488,0.00013446236,0.04519485,0.00033973428,0.000041138283,0.0014506966,0.8971523,0.0028378281,0.003674185,0.025499798,0.023522535,0.00013406006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046205902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039170943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024243249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001253833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03576225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120661296","doi":"10.18352/incontri.10353","title":"Commemorare vittime di violenza","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Incontri Rivista europea di studi italiani","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mural; Sign (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Sociology; Criminology; Art; Art history; Painting; Humanities; Visual arts; Media studies; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.032694833414820684,"score_gpt":0.28686971450284277,"score_spread":0.2541748810880221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120661296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66204625,0.0017669124,0.0016513645,0.0049946755,0.00047504943,0.00005514105,0.000069703354,0.00006054149,0.3288804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98302877,0.00030301424,0.00024944008,0.00014470807,0.00010745344,0.000014814827,0.000013937537,0.000024275618,0.016113568],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840194,0.0008761883,0.000024341256,0.00016557358,0.0002237471,0.00030815645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988256,0.0005277108,0.00021778852,0.00016173249,0.00007023213,0.00019693912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013500899,0.0003143663,0.00029463417,0.001442188,0.006455481,0.0049399654,0.0006423178,0.001329122,0.007827397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034403002,0.00022393331,0.00020425727,0.0008322182,0.0081067905,0.0017497953,0.0047401423,0.0021803954,0.0005613744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018370693,0.00010770117,0.010418844,0.00025678467,0.000025672382,0.0025856686,0.780468,0.00012770183,0.0037962496,0.11112699,0.011072435,0.07983029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022807551,0.00018076506,0.03621347,0.0004924513,0.000023890509,0.002059537,0.45760518,0.00020536216,0.0012826289,0.006446616,0.49543148,0.00003577297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020102093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004843444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007827397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015869499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048074746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026185274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121172441","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2020.1837537","title":"First Nations Women: Law, Power, Story","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Power (physics); Gender studies; Law; Political science; History; Sociology; Genealogy","score_opus":0.018368211373046676,"score_gpt":0.29144403174681005,"score_spread":0.2730758203737634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121172441","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095216796,0.012497562,0.0005039622,0.48411146,0.002458626,0.000035188055,0.000095193864,0.000046618912,0.4050345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7313942,0.0070897057,0.00026214693,0.066215515,0.00088022434,0.00010737435,0.000047427653,0.000073097144,0.19393027],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975988,0.001221488,0.000027885922,0.00013075946,0.00037290785,0.00064819714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984395,0.0008471176,0.00011768361,0.000058027108,0.0001060111,0.00043156111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021830488,0.00046601376,0.0004004799,0.0006342306,0.023813937,0.009081879,0.0012506394,0.0069750454,0.007484267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054189963,0.00035698497,0.00024922634,0.00094712974,0.026938953,0.0069012265,0.006437471,0.011563135,0.001113375],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025551375,0.000033023705,0.00097529776,0.00006590386,0.00000389805,0.0021807177,0.5437529,0.000032337193,0.00018419286,0.32780096,0.11594629,0.008998924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006639017,0.000017841097,0.0009387326,0.00026797605,0.0000033290305,0.000760389,0.35941055,0.000048562106,0.00017636127,0.01605109,0.62229764,0.000020884032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051218253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07216471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051218253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006530275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046586576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10184026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121277720","doi":"10.4324/9780203720028-8","title":"Gender, race, bias and perspective: OR how otherness colours your judgment","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Perspective (graphical); Gender studies; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.10534913117335992,"score_gpt":0.3212235730689191,"score_spread":0.21587444189555915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121277720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02944717,0.025016373,0.0057575214,0.08299003,0.0038359503,0.000022311297,0.000062016086,0.000041650204,0.85282713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8442537,0.010754511,0.0024781274,0.018660247,0.0024412984,0.000055427994,0.000059506852,0.00018006739,0.121117055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958942,0.002366673,0.00005854687,0.00037662292,0.0008213235,0.00048269558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768853,0.0014488708,0.0001464613,0.00014152504,0.00032400657,0.00025066553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044047255,0.00045042852,0.00054762646,0.0011174771,0.0058666286,0.008634568,0.00088094274,0.0017042462,0.005819314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063016554,0.00015587293,0.00033398584,0.0010612473,0.029903853,0.007995812,0.0025863121,0.0040821685,0.001173041],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014118404,0.000005285321,0.000564754,0.000048519687,0.0000050507974,0.00010724836,0.069149904,0.000025544656,0.00015954011,0.89648354,0.01653729,0.016899172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009563797,0.00002963663,0.0016052191,0.0007678145,0.0000113353035,0.00030632052,0.059636038,0.0001072925,0.00024068035,0.44256353,0.49469894,0.000023625971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012188889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018983878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012188889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036213878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002600151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026275098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121304420","doi":"","title":"Condominium and the City: The Rise of Property in Vancouver","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Subdivision; Unit (ring theory); Statute; Common ownership; Land tenure; Business; Corporate governance; Property (philosophy); Common property; Private property; Land use; Property rights; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Geography; Finance; Civil engineering; Economics; Engineering; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01583003807137406,"score_gpt":0.24312714788155992,"score_spread":0.22729710981018586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121304420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7578543,0.004047117,0.0004427272,0.013024706,0.00012790954,0.000034713372,0.00015101049,0.000019945204,0.22429763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746752,0.0012140048,0.00015382915,0.00046039993,0.000015345982,0.000009168146,0.000036919275,0.000010947174,0.023424234],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861836,0.00028563413,0.000029789257,0.0001327585,0.00037592114,0.00055752444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988275,0.00024314052,0.00009478774,0.00005935938,0.00035012918,0.00042500734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054987497,0.00015496064,0.00021135148,0.0011235302,0.02246875,0.008360288,0.0011474786,0.0014448233,0.0047128703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020827705,0.0003335019,0.00012270336,0.0030459592,0.009796158,0.0015216853,0.0046241926,0.0030325192,0.00024660665],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117645366,0.00008032026,0.068513416,0.00021647107,0.000023889803,0.006474551,0.4349705,0.00059726636,0.001670636,0.34193602,0.031569347,0.11382999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021507447,0.000050233353,0.11599661,0.00041640803,0.00001764216,0.0012670404,0.37210718,0.000517888,0.0005106979,0.011515698,0.49748796,0.000091167545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9415052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9845018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058494806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043080162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022221427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31256992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121388763","doi":"","title":"Deconstructin(G) Jazz Improvisation: Derrida and the Law of the Singular Event","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Jazz; Improvisation; Law; Democracy; Philosophy; Literature; Sociology; Epistemology; Art; Visual arts; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.01225968811491482,"score_gpt":0.27411726245919527,"score_spread":0.2618575743442804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121388763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18200843,0.007870438,0.016151654,0.04926471,0.0006996478,0.000058820668,0.000054569515,0.00016976344,0.74372196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97493356,0.00067002967,0.00093691435,0.0013937515,0.0001815242,0.000023076494,0.00001028998,0.000046786114,0.021804187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980621,0.0009944686,0.000059889277,0.00035612474,0.00025762393,0.00026988768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979572,0.0013247204,0.0001624665,0.00026230255,0.00019074455,0.00010251051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024162128,0.00036157973,0.00032811408,0.001317828,0.0068491306,0.0098466845,0.0011803731,0.003418863,0.0029867156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004380916,0.00017013647,0.00033175302,0.00067486515,0.041938838,0.0060414975,0.005215312,0.003555221,0.00048955326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011118177,0.0000053376434,0.0002433781,0.000023432343,0.0000017172472,0.00019714735,0.04587861,0.00007751874,0.00012597039,0.9478289,0.0020131038,0.0035938076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022962067,0.00003371695,0.0015607328,0.00023207205,0.000011151123,0.00056652527,0.06829413,0.000773124,0.0015328688,0.492747,0.43418923,0.000036393772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014102252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016556965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014102252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073549976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023409852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053364515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121438007","doi":"10.21083/csieci.v6i1.1167","title":"Fission and Fusion: From improvisation to formalism in law and music","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Parallels; Improvisation; Performative utterance; Novelty; Formalism (music); Legitimacy; Conjunction (astronomy); Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Aesthetics; Psychology; Literature; Political science; Art; Social psychology; Musical; Philosophy; Visual arts","score_opus":0.04704367628390456,"score_gpt":0.3927394927623631,"score_spread":0.34569581647845854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121438007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29404554,0.009701588,0.07304302,0.037869237,0.00047301807,0.00010507749,0.000043522163,0.0002052389,0.5845138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918745,0.0004868544,0.0019274205,0.00026960834,0.00005783196,0.000027534898,0.000007723542,0.000047367284,0.005301185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98847455,0.00827381,0.0002521415,0.0007248809,0.0014702228,0.00080433814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867415,0.010229066,0.00070902286,0.001230557,0.0005723694,0.0005173975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009756076,0.000694237,0.0007220085,0.0032204664,0.013191724,0.01393125,0.0018074078,0.004045243,0.0037893506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019187646,0.00042869162,0.0006302921,0.0019335975,0.10697004,0.01677468,0.012434882,0.0063144243,0.0003818865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002245722,0.000009491562,0.00015160149,0.000025275544,0.0000028960665,0.00012503791,0.096033745,0.00016444593,0.00015872101,0.89935964,0.000376219,0.0035704519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021112168,0.000037403926,0.0003467527,0.0001920585,0.0000067585574,0.0002290235,0.06840933,0.0008667486,0.0005908269,0.8906545,0.038627055,0.000018449058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046523265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003750974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01393125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010031408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044059325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07278323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121595620","doi":"10.1177/2755323x251340759","title":"Covering: Mutable Characteristics and Perceptions of Voice in the U.S. Supreme Court","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of law & empirical analysis.","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"European Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Supreme court; Perception; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.02739026327728913,"score_gpt":0.35272889870382246,"score_spread":0.32533863542653335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121595620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99666166,0.00007470169,0.00009208641,0.00023834244,0.000008149216,0.0000024039007,0.000024416042,0.0000015925222,0.002896597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996189,0.000023214017,0.000020315149,0.000080804115,0.0000055033165,0.0000011627839,0.000022818314,0.000001609127,0.00022573551],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988636,0.0003911029,0.00005170005,0.00014926588,0.00037527512,0.0001690359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99449605,0.0019428333,0.0018776646,0.00023787649,0.0005100491,0.00093559007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015720811,0.0001283809,0.00013399949,0.00090354064,0.0010664028,0.0023380416,0.00022966236,0.00061156315,0.0036602758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00966661,0.00013998723,0.00012788887,0.000511102,0.0012330255,0.0012658595,0.0014352192,0.000778386,0.00035348072],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003066647,0.00021762235,0.92772466,0.000022669481,0.00007367972,0.0002968342,0.033424497,0.00023977553,0.00397895,0.0020515828,0.0018243867,0.029838756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071436093,0.00011301571,0.9651015,0.00002915767,0.000011679881,0.0001627094,0.029948369,0.0005445586,0.00037850556,0.0016415227,0.002043175,0.000018607187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004197045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011365914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004197045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055994384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003264713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012244821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121640603","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2864588","title":"Monsters &amp; Madwomen? Neurosis, Ambition and Mothering in Women Lawyers in Film","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Neurosis; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Psychotherapist; Criminology","score_opus":0.007552701694089921,"score_gpt":0.24445039258997164,"score_spread":0.23689769089588172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121640603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94610137,0.0015125569,0.00005848215,0.013266558,0.00019571523,0.000017216116,0.0000606832,0.000006378316,0.038780984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934896,0.0005609919,0.000023214323,0.00081352855,0.00005374906,0.000011291229,0.000021271071,0.000006578106,0.005019636],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998703,0.0006209189,0.000037901857,0.00008275495,0.00012079604,0.0004345865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974039,0.0010849971,0.00057336385,0.00006133058,0.000145138,0.0007312216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013004744,0.00019376147,0.00033834163,0.0009080103,0.011774569,0.006696799,0.0008798158,0.0021013492,0.00906622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073655364,0.0003730141,0.00019698658,0.001028371,0.0071367486,0.0031038385,0.003849941,0.004926118,0.00044968564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009474306,0.00019314593,0.048139364,0.00007474764,0.000017257433,0.001636435,0.9248413,0.000015595535,0.00033346916,0.010647283,0.006144324,0.00786239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066574767,0.000020378853,0.023741221,0.000057038036,0.000008449817,0.00022014073,0.96558374,0.0000114326895,0.000062958876,0.00055106904,0.009728724,0.000008189593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051704086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1304266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051704086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037028843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026561539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10280627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121730935","doi":"","title":"The Evolution of Criminal Law and Police During the Pre-Modern Era","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Industrial Revolution; Standardization; Embezzlement; Pace; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Factory (object-oriented programming); Political science; Criminal law; Geography","score_opus":0.00974315086971744,"score_gpt":0.2560810907125723,"score_spread":0.24633793984285485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121730935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8027986,0.007765349,0.0015084504,0.01104038,0.00010650841,0.000031365176,0.00008610109,0.000020874852,0.17664234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920934,0.0019746046,0.00046572674,0.00063574157,0.00013509976,0.000013362013,0.000020371413,0.000015663025,0.0046461616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981401,0.0007235192,0.0000773275,0.00028532775,0.0003006915,0.0004730704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979254,0.00067439955,0.0005348385,0.00013825676,0.00038727836,0.00033988414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019670369,0.00021461112,0.00022257652,0.0036499228,0.0055260197,0.0065419977,0.000523574,0.0019275353,0.0027148202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040371725,0.00048200638,0.00012878944,0.0028968868,0.022792848,0.008610755,0.0036061,0.0023663512,0.00031796802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001235446,0.00011710093,0.01642492,0.0000961592,0.000013260209,0.00074670743,0.10636733,0.000374542,0.00092420867,0.83035266,0.0016288814,0.042830635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000674148,0.00027441987,0.1949961,0.000730765,0.000027533735,0.0016323471,0.08176321,0.0010458515,0.0019134425,0.18282281,0.5345905,0.0001356436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012692664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02072412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012692664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011209513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031518869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081331134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121877225","doi":"","title":"The Sounds of Silence: The Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt, Constitutional Crisis, and Constitutional Silence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Political science; Supreme court; Silence; Constitutional court; Constitutional crisis; Jurisprudence; Constitutionalism; Politics; Constitution; Democracy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011283378310508142,"score_gpt":0.28092338047403254,"score_spread":0.2696400021635244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121877225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36184317,0.014090931,0.0014861884,0.2916953,0.0006356637,0.0000645303,0.00018871337,0.00004153999,0.32995394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827725,0.0011006355,0.00013030026,0.008376197,0.00018189251,0.000016597225,0.000028929324,0.000012986576,0.0073800106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99605834,0.001355316,0.00016292249,0.00034461098,0.0006364813,0.001442452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927908,0.004656297,0.0007270262,0.0002537134,0.0009647417,0.000607304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006280494,0.00019351517,0.00043781265,0.0017217695,0.015690448,0.018946303,0.0015231582,0.00902987,0.005730795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014476791,0.00043536673,0.0002703892,0.0023576308,0.03508393,0.008894117,0.0067422143,0.013899158,0.00031717448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040356208,0.000013507611,0.0013012313,0.000037088783,0.000008132435,0.0008852837,0.029813198,0.00018031047,0.00012122489,0.9563642,0.007440979,0.0037945788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000110421875,0.00004609878,0.008491147,0.0005926476,0.00005061715,0.00039072687,0.122169495,0.0011530193,0.0005993531,0.6873942,0.17884833,0.00015399254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10912345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11240813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10912345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027827274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01688761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21697658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121965501","doi":"","title":"Honing a Critical Cultural Studies of Human Rights","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Cultural rights; Cultural studies; Political science; Environmental ethics; Cultural policy; Sociology; Identity (music); Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Law; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021778669462351154,"score_gpt":0.37436998216618206,"score_spread":0.35259131270383093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121965501","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026228989,0.029047307,0.0744358,0.49359003,0.0040796134,0.00021147181,0.00006694991,0.00008934563,0.37225053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.905429,0.014797357,0.036259282,0.02728655,0.003232334,0.0004161423,0.00004536036,0.00011337706,0.012420599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98309845,0.012239868,0.00042218404,0.0011815346,0.0023233658,0.000734618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9173337,0.062443215,0.0031819998,0.006934072,0.0064736386,0.0036332975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029328002,0.0008642071,0.0007326591,0.0052993107,0.008446066,0.01567616,0.0027426863,0.0054839826,0.004954985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036802642,0.00045208566,0.0005711559,0.0022060669,0.1238136,0.029513635,0.009614944,0.010997865,0.0006585396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002302892,0.000018309487,0.00017810157,0.000084554726,0.0000040183104,0.00003734173,0.010176629,0.00008589971,0.00006041661,0.98062587,0.0029525324,0.0057740584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009331814,0.000012197415,0.00024216624,0.0005764295,0.0000044802596,0.00006743903,0.02037798,0.00022594302,0.00018264247,0.89847547,0.079814956,0.00001093365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043862457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044773594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029328002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008950457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012289205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15510315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121972035","doi":"","title":"Common Sense and Legal Judgment: Community Knowledge, Political Power, and Rhetorical Practice, by Patricia Cochran (review).","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Common sense; Politics; Power (physics); Legal practice; Law; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.012669748546019804,"score_gpt":0.33845781532958247,"score_spread":0.32578806678356265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121972035","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014369932,0.9492179,0.00020487623,0.04552066,0.0015972662,0.000013507267,0.00005011757,0.000007897028,0.0032440498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008394068,0.96143293,0.00058984215,0.019909447,0.0049577407,0.00006713329,0.00012754393,0.000027865342,0.0044934424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655485,0.0012040415,0.00021855366,0.00026390274,0.001562942,0.00019568222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98604345,0.008457587,0.0008955249,0.0002702685,0.0039106365,0.00042249679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004662962,0.0012579334,0.0009954243,0.0073022624,0.002249957,0.00500111,0.0020176808,0.0038532782,0.0044074324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023816684,0.00064408354,0.00051766384,0.012572908,0.0057800603,0.010792338,0.0026143244,0.004968526,0.002173496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002622637,0.000017036913,0.00049922476,0.0032398067,0.000042988995,0.00008982014,0.0012524718,0.000113881535,0.00009204175,0.019074643,0.8499583,0.12559356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017246975,0.000027709808,0.0064664194,0.008867071,0.000051758027,0.0002972748,0.00190229,0.00015246574,0.00013899874,0.017448673,0.9645801,0.000049882223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08131285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16770224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08131285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008432627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01699031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16167909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122151115","doi":"","title":"The Matrix of Law: From Paper, to Word Processing, to Wiki","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.0065556461563345495,"score_gpt":0.284876334417237,"score_spread":0.27832068826090245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122151115","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059804484,0.013041053,0.5325314,0.04666391,0.0031547612,0.00044946448,0.0025616055,0.0026905036,0.3391029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6217223,0.011396466,0.2858526,0.002919299,0.0018274275,0.00068086345,0.001614458,0.001758518,0.072228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640477,0.001662767,0.00032560114,0.0006416052,0.00081695465,0.0001483072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98440266,0.010205273,0.0015634829,0.0022568326,0.0011190932,0.00045276014],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032383972,0.00067436526,0.0005590146,0.008024715,0.003170117,0.019085672,0.0013676143,0.0014315834,0.01747133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028020471,0.00065457524,0.00061944505,0.008373644,0.01252894,0.02685775,0.004690116,0.0020022383,0.0034553246],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051518266,0.000030617466,0.0021495032,0.00045011568,0.000023929468,0.0002184459,0.013611664,0.0008369193,0.00093032495,0.7814987,0.018867077,0.18133111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001630872,0.00003882968,0.001950794,0.00047545414,0.000018428864,0.00037020445,0.013174552,0.0037155843,0.0016121056,0.62691826,0.35165408,0.000055315675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066786543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071770824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99682987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003665051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032175544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05844748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122401284","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Littoral Readings: Representations of Land and Sea in Law, Literature, and Geography","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"The Imaginary; Normative; Plural; Cultural geography; Relation (database); Law and literature; Sociology; Epistemology; Geography; Law; Human geography; Social science; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.014403991654688789,"score_gpt":0.3034313971715747,"score_spread":0.2890274055168859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122401284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020066043,0.09496219,0.022893347,0.081427775,0.009503855,0.00019282353,0.00037413253,0.00042292706,0.77015686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35604447,0.11310286,0.015713478,0.026369387,0.011893369,0.0005305639,0.00063675735,0.000556468,0.47515264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999485,0.00028612695,0.000025245352,0.000046625802,0.00011370993,0.00004331653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991898,0.00053373195,0.0000471318,0.000037117792,0.00008786397,0.00010433616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065323565,0.00052004814,0.00040697056,0.0018017697,0.0030687805,0.00407222,0.0006502405,0.0011884979,0.013047825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015400508,0.00029926948,0.00031139536,0.0021742524,0.006247899,0.004348305,0.0023256594,0.0036293026,0.00168363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021126069,0.00006702687,0.0011187245,0.00056338706,0.000009965486,0.0004531936,0.05874507,0.00029882154,0.0009130183,0.594121,0.2568143,0.08687439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028925317,0.000034433084,0.0020744244,0.0005967765,0.0000037306727,0.00026020737,0.010121509,0.00013937012,0.00009913178,0.053294953,0.93336076,0.000011876832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064028595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015152125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013047825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029816974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001799746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043649316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122401549","doi":"10.1353/tlj.2012.0004","title":"From author’s right to property right","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Chicago; Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Property rights; Statute; Property (philosophy); Exclusive right; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Right to property; Sociology; Intellectual property; Philosophy; Fundamental rights; Human rights; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0151646453969118,"score_gpt":0.24738780700671692,"score_spread":0.2322231616098051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122401549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011520211,0.00523206,0.005120231,0.054929662,0.0017778706,0.000043407155,0.00011422256,0.00007058523,0.92119175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68140197,0.005734549,0.0049168244,0.04280771,0.004355203,0.00021899177,0.000191476,0.00023655026,0.26013675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894996,0.0028068935,0.0005813966,0.0020550955,0.004047207,0.0010096965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986426,0.0077386326,0.0007071238,0.0018027787,0.0026916456,0.00063391274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006395686,0.00043564866,0.00046743205,0.0018239678,0.006411942,0.011910043,0.0015600511,0.008052669,0.013714353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024353564,0.00035058396,0.0005124911,0.0013634689,0.03009603,0.014454772,0.005298604,0.011669805,0.0036061688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004986229,0.000005553084,0.000121153476,0.00001713058,0.0000016303555,0.00005526155,0.0021185826,0.000026509393,0.000047597423,0.9886016,0.006503508,0.002496543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018090946,0.000031944495,0.0004005024,0.00035931973,0.000009082205,0.00022221208,0.0017375692,0.00015251686,0.00042565045,0.51171166,0.48490617,0.000025301933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007757008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065021226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013714353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076089473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008570145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055207074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122427504","doi":"10.3917/riej.085.0271","title":"M. St-Hilaire , Les positivismes juridiques au XX e siècle. Normativismes, sociologismes, réalismes , coll. Dikè, Presses universitaires de Laval, 2020, 92 p.","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue interdisciplinaire d études juridiques","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017427128939678335,"score_gpt":0.28586868795352,"score_spread":0.26844155901384165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122427504","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007989304,0.8390006,0.0021286716,0.12932661,0.0054727863,0.000016967868,0.0003414434,0.0000646831,0.022849306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05197283,0.86504215,0.005092177,0.01834709,0.011064477,0.00012384077,0.00033678344,0.00015821012,0.047862407],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834454,0.00066378835,0.00013307545,0.00017729921,0.0005753272,0.00010597858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99533576,0.0031741045,0.00025971676,0.0000991718,0.00094157015,0.00018972496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029608756,0.0015398791,0.0011006298,0.0034672637,0.004374226,0.0036289021,0.0015940502,0.00556908,0.0108501315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049103126,0.0010801547,0.000681324,0.0041233143,0.0045923768,0.0101358015,0.0014990859,0.006046694,0.0047281943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008494938,0.000048509726,0.0007633875,0.00063875027,0.000029192217,0.00012879768,0.003749374,0.00022573935,0.00014711627,0.15097642,0.77145606,0.07175171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007574395,0.000026181677,0.009544778,0.0022255613,0.000033706507,0.00031011747,0.0023588906,0.0004932891,0.0005119569,0.1502379,0.83412015,0.00006174281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04874709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.094357975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04874709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004139608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004939485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09692669},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3122749422","doi":"","title":"The Surprise of Invention: Making Fun of the Statutory","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Deconstruction (building); Slogan; Nothing; Surprise; Relation (database); Economic Justice; Statutory law; Creativity; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Engineering; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.014232858994473675,"score_gpt":0.28962686884330874,"score_spread":0.27539400984883505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122749422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024429273,0.045022495,0.011974935,0.44286475,0.023221374,0.00005547759,0.00009357029,0.00018348411,0.45215464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6069691,0.018092902,0.003769716,0.059382066,0.0143814115,0.00013693084,0.0000582533,0.0005451719,0.29666436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949233,0.0031393482,0.00009467258,0.00031643567,0.0011437273,0.0003826457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98940885,0.007179601,0.00050752086,0.0011323706,0.0010865694,0.00068508816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006186745,0.00035054702,0.00044235296,0.001374614,0.008163064,0.0124706235,0.0011140152,0.0043692817,0.0110423975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018188372,0.00034340445,0.0004062089,0.0012049645,0.022133859,0.014187491,0.0051668435,0.0063569886,0.0016945589],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000229656,0.000013971395,0.0003897199,0.0001516878,0.000006817977,0.00025136844,0.0580817,0.00007415734,0.0002820861,0.79238856,0.12830976,0.020027217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040015975,0.000014479474,0.00052787963,0.00024548496,0.000004927568,0.00015900478,0.013546866,0.0001532787,0.00028892444,0.11289946,0.87213904,0.000016719041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035412682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00720137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0124706235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004581891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031536676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036940455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122783133","doi":"","title":"The Creative Life of Law: Improvisation, between Tradition and Suspicion","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Jazz; Improvisation; Meaning (existential); Law; Betrayal; Allusion; Sociology; Aesthetics; Art; Literature; Political science; Philosophy; Visual arts; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03988324012963165,"score_gpt":0.31640401847561284,"score_spread":0.2765207783459812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122783133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23778899,0.022335153,0.02475002,0.18616033,0.0012521014,0.000085037595,0.000034913708,0.0002305628,0.5273629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98963445,0.0012214881,0.0010174118,0.002843144,0.00036170363,0.000035118166,0.0000068973022,0.00006739625,0.004812277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9623728,0.027552823,0.00070633716,0.0022759773,0.005126128,0.001966029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95204484,0.0368688,0.0035023734,0.0032660565,0.0017193207,0.0025986158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016142048,0.0005695837,0.00059535285,0.0038552135,0.022431113,0.03587418,0.002528113,0.0069967383,0.0031821476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048233565,0.0006808904,0.0004956734,0.0023276329,0.18499213,0.027087262,0.016604643,0.013352208,0.00069032336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000281847,0.000030089364,0.000735047,0.00004169725,0.0000062130525,0.0003332133,0.23112325,0.00008694432,0.00012833042,0.7532504,0.0030616298,0.011174994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052814692,0.00006745594,0.00088275765,0.00060369883,0.000012507951,0.0006825991,0.15456702,0.00070013123,0.00038666948,0.72542006,0.11656372,0.00006070713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004829795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004374307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03587418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013420537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00705427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09737325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122935299","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/gt67p","title":"Space, Time, and Historical Injustice: A Feminist Conflict-of-Laws Approach to the Comfort Women Agreement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Comfort women; Injustice; Law; Conciliation; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Closure (psychology); Mediation","score_opus":0.03930702758873108,"score_gpt":0.2961627757196125,"score_spread":0.25685574813088147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122935299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094089806,0.02329684,0.02515066,0.16937652,0.0010552042,0.00012197031,0.00015928893,0.000048651877,0.6867011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96316326,0.0035031443,0.0021392135,0.008550454,0.00036066212,0.00014278053,0.00002945802,0.000045312052,0.022065671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947072,0.0041110357,0.0000627853,0.0003090224,0.00026974347,0.00054017967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592185,0.0030641006,0.00037090314,0.00016089318,0.00020899565,0.00027329416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005464421,0.0007370748,0.00038406978,0.0018654001,0.015933912,0.014316904,0.0026785694,0.0071064783,0.005238106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005251124,0.0004632006,0.0004719626,0.0013287744,0.060904805,0.016036037,0.0081562055,0.008281802,0.0004250102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057852194,0.000010948441,0.0002611709,0.000016965818,0.0000019756449,0.00022951806,0.057023086,0.00009428839,0.00003259014,0.9386324,0.0022172055,0.0014741101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000175581,0.000031817213,0.0009341736,0.00046883756,0.000013526184,0.00042164006,0.20489551,0.000978125,0.0003018693,0.58646977,0.20543048,0.000036755955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012124977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016765473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015933912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011461161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042384267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08315688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122989730","doi":"10.7202/1074418ar","title":"Criminal Law and Digital Technologies: An Institutional Approach to Rule Creation in a Rapidly Advancing and Complex Setting","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Parliament; Normative; Institution; Political science; Emerging technologies; Strengths and weaknesses; Law and economics; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Public administration; Computer science; Politics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.028449072122355895,"score_gpt":0.29416837875582025,"score_spread":0.2657193066334643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122989730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056249067,0.0035353429,0.18473111,0.1298755,0.00037730773,0.00044494148,0.00013621281,0.00026155188,0.62438893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95686775,0.0010667532,0.024704149,0.0036149828,0.00016588972,0.0001799643,0.00003831789,0.000060516762,0.0133016445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716547,0.014265082,0.0011145902,0.0028911207,0.0062070885,0.003867388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9671299,0.018519612,0.0029061662,0.004823464,0.00421627,0.0024045722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028151305,0.0004839215,0.0007212637,0.005924845,0.017069725,0.034807313,0.0057021375,0.00885068,0.004694318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040084828,0.0008563877,0.0011003944,0.0045714835,0.12617484,0.015546354,0.012054188,0.009948397,0.0005332555],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017503877,0.00000493267,0.00023346662,0.000007301348,0.0000034435752,0.00003804135,0.0021156236,0.00040717184,0.000029765317,0.99506193,0.0003798755,0.0017165904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020060457,0.000017359105,0.00095727143,0.00018037925,0.000023503608,0.000085962296,0.0058784555,0.0028908637,0.00034657278,0.93926716,0.05028715,0.0000453164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23578726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2413364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23578726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052748047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0996036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4688297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123022889","doi":"","title":"Privacy and Private Law: The Dilemma of Justification","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Tort; Political science; Autonomy; Harm; Law and economics; Value (mathematics); Jurisprudence; Scope (computer science); Privacy law; Information privacy; Law; Privacy policy; Business; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science; Liability; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04208848598879124,"score_gpt":0.35490124124055045,"score_spread":0.3128127552517592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123022889","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021877479,0.005474256,0.08212439,0.62437594,0.0025047055,0.0002162014,0.00020132083,0.00011807804,0.26310766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9161058,0.0018504156,0.02121989,0.0391992,0.0034077794,0.00055408437,0.000071063005,0.00021269158,0.017379137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9383427,0.04449823,0.002432636,0.0046442994,0.008040928,0.0020412956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.854813,0.119965896,0.00457609,0.01104357,0.007415575,0.0021859335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0689473,0.0007096626,0.0018881767,0.0034105026,0.010466991,0.015141937,0.0051850867,0.035453044,0.009296477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1588704,0.0014215418,0.001166649,0.0019360615,0.12346195,0.042019796,0.008612889,0.029554272,0.0013743836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013767289,0.000010790796,0.00008118143,0.000027319558,0.000005035152,0.00003725334,0.00278884,0.000035955192,0.00006030758,0.99210656,0.002635446,0.0021975134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032776537,0.00001324379,0.00015006716,0.00021160036,0.000011227154,0.00016584786,0.0027228387,0.000552588,0.00024044371,0.97222304,0.023643335,0.000032909247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076866113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006147987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0689473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070065684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011848437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36463255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123026783","doi":"","title":"Trans Rights Are Not Just Human Rights: Legal Strategies for Trans Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Human rights; Political science; International human rights law; Law; Reservation of rights; Jurisprudence; Right to property; Legal realism; Legal pluralism; Legal research","score_opus":0.027974968390027083,"score_gpt":0.3057204825748073,"score_spread":0.2777455141847802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123026783","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025015373,0.0044327998,0.044806134,0.27668056,0.0008201466,0.000118714386,0.00004316642,0.00014129703,0.64794177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87323445,0.0023191492,0.018247796,0.032992154,0.00025518902,0.00012955483,0.00004756693,0.00015274275,0.072621405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868845,0.0057389895,0.00031815752,0.0011362771,0.0032534217,0.002668701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889759,0.0033947753,0.000770153,0.0013965693,0.0028430852,0.0026195454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017403025,0.00049150793,0.0004995041,0.001792824,0.025193276,0.016582716,0.0024611168,0.007871451,0.010160658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016968193,0.00028847,0.0005182958,0.0014789687,0.073575854,0.018738221,0.015323304,0.011089204,0.0016165621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026387704,0.000007790634,0.0002119764,0.00002177341,0.0000021835117,0.0001133862,0.020682145,0.000038161626,0.00013508985,0.96496516,0.0055054217,0.008314204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007379745,0.000018740782,0.0007904674,0.00041373336,0.000011127451,0.00043220128,0.07186308,0.0002973764,0.00042653215,0.5763097,0.34939,0.00003968313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17620504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2274291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17620504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016304603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044240396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35035884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123095849","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2728","title":"Failure to Report: The Manifestly Unconstitutional Nature of the Human Smugglers Act","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Government (linguistics); Legislation; Political science; Accountability; Human rights; Ideology; Politics; Law; Cover (algebra); Law and economics; Constitution; Public administration; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.012456335524185576,"score_gpt":0.28685325592408534,"score_spread":0.27439692039989977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123095849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26820076,0.0010437515,0.008493132,0.21646963,0.00071263383,0.00011661307,0.00025123288,0.00025144935,0.5044609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661894,0.0002585405,0.00083284086,0.010384819,0.00007882934,0.00003217623,0.000039238756,0.00004694258,0.022137277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98138326,0.005162459,0.0003418145,0.0012269435,0.007662674,0.0042227325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98102874,0.008655673,0.0016775724,0.0016878926,0.0056262976,0.0013236839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01609924,0.0004474097,0.00041048485,0.0014147963,0.023682313,0.0093178535,0.0028635552,0.008825017,0.0023045451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029036218,0.00044746898,0.00044263748,0.0015857166,0.039765935,0.002957672,0.003467183,0.011689572,0.0004308644],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038131115,0.0000373722,0.008867378,0.00004380242,0.00003228692,0.0017817067,0.09937058,0.00097464205,0.00086445233,0.8284321,0.043679964,0.01587768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010184692,0.000106846586,0.03935719,0.0005349163,0.00027655228,0.0011967157,0.18946187,0.0056635397,0.004902743,0.17786257,0.5800198,0.00051544816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9564521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9524841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04986963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04986963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11835219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3618312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123132986","doi":"","title":"'The Paradox of Performative Immediacy: Law, Music, Improvisation'","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Performative utterance; Performativity; Immediacy; Jazz; Aesthetics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Philosophy; Art; Visual arts; Political science","score_opus":0.007302043473426044,"score_gpt":0.24519148014230924,"score_spread":0.23788943666888318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123132986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057454668,0.009321605,0.01597271,0.30705425,0.0011158894,0.000019718495,0.000046931684,0.00019536172,0.6088188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9530744,0.0015736016,0.0012198634,0.014299114,0.00084099406,0.00004513723,0.000015707717,0.00009571366,0.02883558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99209154,0.0043712966,0.00019616881,0.00079163775,0.0019022685,0.0006469933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882427,0.00905559,0.00081070664,0.00072453014,0.0007484405,0.00041805868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005840985,0.0003948268,0.00038604572,0.0012341258,0.009836666,0.016383111,0.0019945237,0.008475953,0.0075586466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020402301,0.00029450306,0.00036836835,0.0010521088,0.06223368,0.01505446,0.006989301,0.008019308,0.0009994436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014792867,0.000009599271,0.00014273691,0.00003501179,0.0000022936092,0.00010451813,0.029518435,0.000069513015,0.000105560524,0.9557478,0.0077510118,0.0064987396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004130192,0.000035477035,0.00072009815,0.0003522641,0.0000072947005,0.00032886473,0.03322894,0.00035141569,0.0006271052,0.71129596,0.2529832,0.000028107179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005109161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006084626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016383111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039753895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00288486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030890465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123280249","doi":"","title":"Farewell to the Exclusive-Inclusive Debate","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Positivism; Morality; Law; Legal positivism; Political science; Economic Justice; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Comparative law","score_opus":0.007063776264497988,"score_gpt":0.2848277370582134,"score_spread":0.2777639607937154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123280249","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012475168,0.021340758,0.018635638,0.50945175,0.0035149534,0.000028555798,0.000057503374,0.00006495908,0.4344307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72641855,0.011101834,0.0056802263,0.16931067,0.008251964,0.00018060657,0.000080964826,0.0002645439,0.07871062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839271,0.007824186,0.00041167872,0.0021379557,0.004441098,0.0012580699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97802794,0.014707595,0.0009913302,0.0023278075,0.0022618806,0.0016834695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017273244,0.00060509075,0.0011304914,0.0018836341,0.011254357,0.014732399,0.0026065651,0.013846969,0.010296607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03800335,0.0004332747,0.00084404665,0.0020934907,0.056818847,0.023505917,0.012987857,0.02268698,0.0015158188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007647682,0.0000066871203,0.000043318596,0.000019759183,0.0000020603823,0.000015554411,0.0010200411,0.000024708475,0.0000121863595,0.9914479,0.0047165905,0.0026834179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000102669965,0.0000047794942,0.000070032096,0.00012070034,0.000003366211,0.00002740679,0.00095761736,0.00010102449,0.000032124455,0.9164229,0.082243636,0.0000062117965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075029926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00818477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017273244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009252475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064460193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091350734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123334869","doi":"","title":"Introduction to 'Queer Theory: Law, Culture, Empire'","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queer; Empire; Scrutiny; Privilege (computing); Law; Sociology; Queer theory; Gender studies; Political science; Media studies","score_opus":0.011365734692543513,"score_gpt":0.30482128343269466,"score_spread":0.2934555487401511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123334869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001597554,0.095760144,0.011835415,0.05430505,0.0066655213,0.00010506575,0.001026819,0.00033675047,0.8283676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07966948,0.13713002,0.012110071,0.018175045,0.010876958,0.00041340166,0.0015794352,0.0006919887,0.7393536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926883,0.00026292144,0.00003530928,0.000074987365,0.0002894984,0.00006853315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985259,0.0010258702,0.00006931251,0.00008715627,0.00020080527,0.000091053815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007735135,0.0006438924,0.00057341356,0.0019124954,0.0031282268,0.0044196704,0.0010574376,0.001687762,0.03722965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022751214,0.0003311697,0.00041794378,0.0025783032,0.005545516,0.0036643387,0.0012940592,0.0045349407,0.0062220735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055178575,0.000016571668,0.00015781437,0.00020743329,0.0000045662746,0.00007063936,0.0035440456,0.00018420111,0.000081628066,0.39459753,0.5496617,0.051468343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016257717,0.000005585045,0.00036357195,0.00028012783,0.0000014117596,0.000092187314,0.00071711966,0.00009165266,0.000030535375,0.036113188,0.962297,0.0000059666804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013233316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019140981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03722965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037198528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029152634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124545634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123440860","doi":"","title":"Faces of Judicial Anger: Answering the Call","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Passion; Instinct; Judgement; Deed; Economic Justice; Anger; Law; Passions; Philosophy; Psychology; Sociology; Literature; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Social psychology; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.01921813872042575,"score_gpt":0.3126749610501643,"score_spread":0.2934568223297385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123440860","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01942439,0.00580603,0.00058227644,0.9124508,0.002720637,0.000013510265,0.000047825295,0.000014855453,0.05893967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48567095,0.0071700225,0.0010206015,0.47804248,0.005715198,0.00012762245,0.000052469288,0.000043302047,0.022157317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652076,0.002022826,0.00006158666,0.0002285775,0.00048014795,0.00068609195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939732,0.0034799436,0.0008151343,0.00028122455,0.00075375097,0.0006967953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061333175,0.00043523815,0.00041035435,0.00069784455,0.014214999,0.008669591,0.0017116641,0.016878154,0.006940107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016635466,0.00031387608,0.00035510364,0.0004537868,0.024383757,0.014371005,0.00506387,0.014201056,0.001313034],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095980344,0.0000707592,0.0065032896,0.00014015398,0.000023397346,0.001225673,0.1404769,0.00005332913,0.0002709979,0.2975106,0.5152498,0.038379118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006819295,0.00005915001,0.010320344,0.0009848567,0.000033458055,0.0019216564,0.37468618,0.00025580503,0.00040507596,0.19179252,0.4193957,0.00007714991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010280463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02833042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016878154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024155474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053237756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03243649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123455425","doi":"10.1080/08900523.2012.746119","title":"Freedom of expression v. social responsibility: Holocaust denial in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Holocaust; Denial; Hatred; Sociology; Social responsibility; Corporation; Moral responsibility; Law; Event (particle physics); Media studies; Psychoanalysis; Political science; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.008387259463753155,"score_gpt":0.20043916792570626,"score_spread":0.1920519084619531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123455425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27485266,0.010927669,0.004233397,0.08916279,0.0006311101,0.000099548044,0.00021267033,0.00007851607,0.6198015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654439,0.0019368166,0.00032704457,0.0048485873,0.00005411198,0.000016813414,0.000021684491,0.000019641207,0.027331397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472696,0.0005922779,0.00011148201,0.00039054808,0.0020104041,0.0021683762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969003,0.0011097805,0.0002694625,0.00020992866,0.0010019284,0.0005085823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021430128,0.00032880518,0.0003971991,0.0010809468,0.02756593,0.0075935056,0.0018790952,0.0038579924,0.0037756877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005991242,0.00033648236,0.0003526228,0.0019090044,0.024157278,0.003058789,0.0056768884,0.0072478442,0.00015255915],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029811528,0.000016824908,0.0022840928,0.00008051938,0.000011711898,0.0005930885,0.063923,0.00040988138,0.00033879565,0.90229064,0.0124032665,0.017618425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004316332,0.00003627807,0.021252025,0.00067984586,0.00007871319,0.0005267524,0.090788566,0.0017053469,0.0017433988,0.08315503,0.7997548,0.00023603025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98914015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98992085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12294095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12294095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11847782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8920032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123614476","doi":"","title":"Teaching Critically within a Modern Legal Genre","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Harm; Ideology; Subject (documents); State (computer science); Sociology; Law; Function (biology); Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.007333701419379305,"score_gpt":0.2761974919863342,"score_spread":0.2688637905669549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123614476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037433796,0.006085618,0.024517898,0.061423592,0.002218143,0.000074581985,0.000027960567,0.00014271105,0.8680756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86459863,0.006328087,0.009375824,0.014568737,0.0025175172,0.00016461094,0.000044304816,0.00022273621,0.10217954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954407,0.0029865096,0.00010220522,0.00034123976,0.0007387492,0.00039068784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928174,0.004853799,0.0005113539,0.0006217624,0.00058229413,0.0006133489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040020566,0.00051569194,0.00037612588,0.001953466,0.009573007,0.011979031,0.0013256914,0.004222658,0.011465024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008951612,0.00020497816,0.00030258312,0.0009348499,0.040577795,0.0102551235,0.004577941,0.00805821,0.0014654917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051944658,0.000033370223,0.00023540149,0.00007122879,0.0000025416439,0.00014574459,0.061166827,0.0001060642,0.00035782816,0.9170642,0.008343531,0.012468134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000108345375,0.00005939405,0.00032401326,0.000557685,0.000005893687,0.0003849955,0.04249844,0.0004372563,0.0006846502,0.36046967,0.59455156,0.000015563215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030870638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047515566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011979031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008768227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006059664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06361824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123853777","doi":"10.1177/1743872107086148","title":"'As if' - The Court of Shakespeare &amp; the Relationship of Law and Literature","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ANU Open Research (Australian National University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentative; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Realm; Sociology; Criticism; Object (grammar); Literature; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.3137925608860499,"score_gpt":0.4411033107181292,"score_spread":0.1273107498320793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123853777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069283894,0.04817913,0.0038937274,0.103491515,0.007914938,0.000028392673,0.00011614703,0.000117989584,0.8293297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44751358,0.018453756,0.0034341835,0.023787668,0.0038034613,0.00009797503,0.0001413782,0.0002340157,0.50253385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967002,0.001374146,0.00012811228,0.0004670942,0.00097402337,0.0003564221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971782,0.0012288634,0.00019225362,0.0003428978,0.0008070701,0.00025083474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020513926,0.00036839466,0.00037901042,0.0017215769,0.011814462,0.017814592,0.00077488576,0.0047981716,0.013020196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008493158,0.0002480425,0.00020720156,0.0015497751,0.023744056,0.0081193615,0.003282164,0.0059282808,0.0034106195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008474952,0.0000059787376,0.00017693319,0.000050547478,0.0000027426274,0.00015720067,0.008585502,0.000032403706,0.000098359225,0.8610636,0.110279314,0.019539004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025693478,0.0000073250535,0.00041718277,0.00039732683,0.0000022722081,0.00016267772,0.005208905,0.00006811615,0.00012904961,0.082259744,0.9113341,0.000010713991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026746353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037905414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026746353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007924218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007905695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05749446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123876366","doi":"","title":"Why Feminism Matters to the Study of Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Feminism; Scholarship; Feminist legal theory; Law; Privilege (computing); Sociology; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0224927636220108,"score_gpt":0.3039944328821766,"score_spread":0.2815016692601658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123876366","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006742559,0.0292458,0.0012264869,0.8857832,0.0019124668,0.000008252331,0.000030404512,0.000016093689,0.07503478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74135023,0.033265017,0.002702542,0.16925636,0.006322885,0.00011683368,0.000047832804,0.00019332128,0.046745077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9790141,0.016112773,0.00024998994,0.0010187724,0.0021379073,0.0014665216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97459716,0.020602956,0.00084541115,0.00089655357,0.0018648404,0.0011930557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016485607,0.00039133438,0.0007296097,0.0013292922,0.011809809,0.009820573,0.001623845,0.0066132275,0.010699945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026511641,0.00059019384,0.00050549995,0.0012971194,0.057442214,0.013909284,0.004370442,0.011370153,0.0020056101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020243446,0.000019202627,0.0005443804,0.00014607482,0.000009967362,0.0001378772,0.038089983,0.000098777164,0.00007584306,0.89847976,0.05185713,0.010520768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022310609,0.000017079792,0.0011863306,0.0007742194,0.000008570431,0.00014726997,0.031343147,0.00018112201,0.00016781027,0.47375453,0.49237102,0.00002658235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03347027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02971955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03347027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013917586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074199606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100979626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123918208","doi":"10.3138/utlj.61.2.213","title":"FORMALISM IN MUSIC AND LAW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formalism (music); Epistemology; Law; Theoretical physics; Philosophy; Political science; Physics; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.022847260544907672,"score_gpt":0.21664331691128785,"score_spread":0.19379605636638017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123918208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035911366,0.035298936,0.16485226,0.105110966,0.00183036,0.00006886507,0.00015009916,0.00049423845,0.6562829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94005245,0.008406652,0.019781956,0.004272083,0.0010432482,0.000086397835,0.00005797451,0.00013280625,0.026166465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960747,0.0023487336,0.00017493559,0.00040182364,0.0006992157,0.00030063672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960646,0.00239575,0.00032884724,0.00059716863,0.0003366408,0.0002771184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056905947,0.00043721835,0.0005601723,0.0013982793,0.005785765,0.009405883,0.0011682243,0.0036800103,0.0033113935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00987604,0.00036444984,0.00060527213,0.0013546622,0.051425558,0.008925183,0.00409033,0.0035542955,0.00057500944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010536592,0.0000010446364,0.000026313211,0.0000065038275,6.735552e-7,0.000007653288,0.0006676839,0.00014404122,0.000012346546,0.9975325,0.00047899727,0.0011212503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044161593,0.00000408011,0.00006292441,0.000039419327,0.0000013003297,0.000020030633,0.00033611926,0.00046742216,0.000033031327,0.9728468,0.026178595,0.0000058466617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021764638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012919622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021764638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009821681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070398087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071261644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124128092","doi":"","title":"Necessarily Critical? The Adoption of a Parody Defence to Copyright Infringement in Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Copyright infringement; Fair use; Argument (complex analysis); Copyright Act; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Political science; Autonomy; Exclusive right; Sociology; Intellectual property; Copyright law","score_opus":0.013223757226635591,"score_gpt":0.2736248085048189,"score_spread":0.2604010512781833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124128092","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09140931,0.007211394,0.002380968,0.64294916,0.0026994213,0.0002962014,0.000365728,0.00014032681,0.25254747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63750166,0.0048702452,0.0031443662,0.24890251,0.0004948575,0.00015914277,0.00014905493,0.0002140069,0.104564145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9643242,0.003925076,0.0015902253,0.003941799,0.017168973,0.009049794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.912808,0.032551344,0.0034396958,0.0024560944,0.038349546,0.010395425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022783486,0.00054703146,0.0009530331,0.0023947412,0.062111277,0.023995448,0.005884892,0.01805312,0.009679728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07274989,0.0011938774,0.0011236581,0.004643501,0.026680687,0.0067626946,0.006721044,0.022276722,0.00067507004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012182796,0.000077630815,0.011645161,0.00048143655,0.0000796826,0.0028415772,0.08727939,0.00064943597,0.0014108563,0.5894757,0.26965556,0.03628182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105924155,0.00005665766,0.02374121,0.0008827712,0.00018021812,0.00042434788,0.060374334,0.0013679247,0.0014236897,0.033589467,0.8772935,0.0005600476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9952916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99749655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28167126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28167126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44782904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8331595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124147477","doi":"10.29173/alr224","title":"After &lt;i&gt;Labaye&lt;/i&gt;: The Harm Test of Obscenity, the New Judicial Vacuum, and the Relevance of Familiar Voices","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Law; Harm; Economic Justice; Legislature; Sociology; Relevance (law); Lesbian; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.01199961381665706,"score_gpt":0.2742634174716407,"score_spread":0.26226380365498364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124147477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033403005,0.017259829,0.0032737036,0.30076718,0.0018178528,0.000054522894,0.00015982328,0.00008792725,0.64317614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63712955,0.004754522,0.0013438732,0.13251181,0.00081315654,0.00006887987,0.00008143819,0.00013052467,0.22316632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966876,0.0008767659,0.000059275997,0.0003459384,0.0012831052,0.00074740074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868673,0.00049620087,0.000102841885,0.000099025245,0.00046212898,0.00015300295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017399125,0.00034178948,0.0002747974,0.00069912395,0.014257988,0.013344955,0.0012484126,0.0071379915,0.0067044506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055345693,0.0002388371,0.00035374568,0.00062575506,0.022507234,0.0056195944,0.0026309069,0.009081432,0.0011059495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021253325,0.000009632135,0.0006549598,0.000054976834,0.0000047809017,0.00043091766,0.014754915,0.00004959156,0.0003266909,0.87079585,0.09934254,0.013553901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024900217,0.000026072516,0.0033368699,0.00043683054,0.000026734675,0.00039771028,0.036729828,0.00034622077,0.0018815057,0.13329771,0.8234092,0.000086419685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.470049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5558167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.529951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020615302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014565985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.934626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124244906","doi":"","title":"Body Polluted: Questions of Scale, Gender, and Remedy","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Harm; Context (archaeology); Mass tort; Law; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Criminology; History","score_opus":0.014228447859823903,"score_gpt":0.28182992265465906,"score_spread":0.26760147479483515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124244906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18313783,0.008909484,0.032529164,0.08312262,0.00069360033,0.000084700194,0.00009274939,0.00008788095,0.69134194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876908,0.00077994994,0.00133509,0.0017496027,0.00013336272,0.000053384807,0.0000102345075,0.000025289955,0.0082223015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99354607,0.0027795162,0.00024080309,0.00092948554,0.0018448783,0.0006593492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996005,0.0019382415,0.0005233861,0.0006022261,0.0005878589,0.00034333635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006976575,0.00034609306,0.00062507554,0.0015699891,0.0070041437,0.0072257374,0.0016667664,0.0037751948,0.004703729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012227388,0.00028107094,0.00057331845,0.0012860922,0.10890568,0.010273736,0.008492395,0.0037848875,0.000362248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062994063,0.000007131902,0.00055983564,0.000016810434,0.0000028693078,0.00005365598,0.01372916,0.00005168467,0.00014692986,0.97946435,0.00046378223,0.0054974095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017995195,0.00006084486,0.0048238225,0.00026181195,0.000015814176,0.0002811724,0.058903307,0.00021536762,0.00048484342,0.8800452,0.05486302,0.00002689751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008895478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008139312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008895478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005650497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044182064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040997386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124316098","doi":"10.1177/1743872109360122","title":"‘ ‘Passing through the Mirror’’: <i>Dead Man</i> , Legal Pluralism and the De-territorialization of the West","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Indigenous; Realm; Sociology; Scholarship; Frontier; Premise; Legal pluralism; Negotiation; Embodied cognition; Law; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Legal realism; Political science; Comparative law","score_opus":0.01443250552076582,"score_gpt":0.255492472209391,"score_spread":0.24105996668862514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124316098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32866624,0.011359486,0.019435707,0.07902667,0.0015209393,0.000054089935,0.00005063077,0.00012975786,0.55975646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96895,0.0016987486,0.0014087512,0.0021836588,0.00016635635,0.000014768063,0.000010895436,0.000047069072,0.025519898],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986975,0.0008064211,0.000031953725,0.00014861854,0.00014596475,0.000169585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992331,0.00034873048,0.00011455978,0.000114867406,0.000069505564,0.00011915763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001695332,0.00031572845,0.0002408839,0.0006463579,0.008078099,0.008766283,0.0008051555,0.0018737547,0.0033333378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002965952,0.00021711175,0.000151051,0.0005167789,0.03196768,0.008450844,0.0036077164,0.0039500776,0.00033135066],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024651057,0.000017108689,0.0005766085,0.00007107773,0.000004528343,0.0003729876,0.28113762,0.000047460046,0.00095524255,0.69792444,0.0057296553,0.0131386835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015185643,0.00009925353,0.00278939,0.00045613927,0.00002807949,0.0014939652,0.35467646,0.0005054094,0.0032125176,0.16083726,0.47584194,0.000044361244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008915921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0134092225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008915921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023989836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015904875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01772809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124333472","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2957","title":"Earwitness Evidence: The Reliability of Voice Identifications","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Reliability (semiconductor); Eyewitness identification; Principal (computer security); Identification (biology); Psychology; Empirical evidence; Law; Criminology; Actuarial science; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Computer security; Epistemology; Data mining; Relation (database)","score_opus":0.042399755751849066,"score_gpt":0.3324199045392382,"score_spread":0.29002014878738913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124333472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60824364,0.085800976,0.0764071,0.06940749,0.002476286,0.00032349845,0.0022261273,0.00021083778,0.15490402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873827,0.005702381,0.003834035,0.0011459229,0.00058774184,0.000026375776,0.00018944919,0.00003188676,0.0010994326],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8610491,0.05778001,0.013662833,0.008258718,0.056268808,0.0029805223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.23373187,0.57444006,0.064914785,0.025613178,0.0989814,0.0023187525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.107691206,0.00062668254,0.0012621358,0.016104182,0.0025695686,0.0094669955,0.0043369634,0.003712796,0.0029228493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.64359546,0.0006845777,0.0008721087,0.010477596,0.021839397,0.0094383,0.006402953,0.0038945097,0.00055018853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004593284,0.00007578167,0.6557808,0.0028620113,0.0011659295,0.0016348256,0.019606002,0.0023297907,0.0010599789,0.1061431,0.011285634,0.19759691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009233112,0.00048665592,0.73713046,0.011307419,0.0014092455,0.0057700183,0.030742219,0.010661004,0.006110195,0.15029906,0.045542464,0.00044889742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026949573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022164885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107691206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048409235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005169239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56953233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124358534","doi":"10.22145/flr.40.3.4","title":"Open Justice: Concepts and Judicial Approaches","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Statute; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.14178998189936715,"score_gpt":0.40267549561988003,"score_spread":0.2608855137205129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124358534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016620664,0.035681598,0.10643374,0.07362445,0.001780015,0.0001937372,0.00007107061,0.00008135335,0.76551336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9280857,0.010665297,0.019200448,0.00957034,0.0019888165,0.0004234003,0.000038309096,0.00006368681,0.029964011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9635691,0.020016383,0.0014367271,0.002950038,0.008815254,0.0032124615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9669371,0.023557981,0.0025025234,0.002152343,0.0036249247,0.0012251395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03144035,0.00058990443,0.0009988929,0.0069789337,0.011252357,0.02148028,0.004384411,0.010591126,0.0042352057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029380953,0.0005706977,0.0012272443,0.0054244497,0.1185242,0.014995909,0.009305651,0.012049362,0.0005605785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.3769192e-7,0.0000014230111,0.00000952037,0.000006207371,5.031009e-7,0.00000594847,0.0003950352,0.00003065716,0.0000027265212,0.9988456,0.00023825634,0.00046381168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028130596,0.00000437428,0.00006705656,0.00011793139,0.0000022180227,0.000018469154,0.0009158987,0.00024283279,0.000019079374,0.9808358,0.017768703,0.000004885454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015546303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011177078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03144035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01898109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015708832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16627443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124374797","doi":"","title":"The Prejudicial Effects of 'Reasonable Steps' in Analysis of Mens Rea and Sexual Consent: Two Solutions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Fondation pour la recherche juridique","keywords":"Mens rea; Statutory law; Law; Plaintiff; Jurisprudence; Mistake; Statute; Political science; Psychology; Criminal law","score_opus":0.028784495597676315,"score_gpt":0.32801537043932694,"score_spread":0.2992308748416506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124374797","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084195904,0.008489357,0.55163944,0.22910029,0.0034901456,0.00076274446,0.00014925303,0.00019936562,0.12197351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8194618,0.0020464584,0.13808264,0.023334375,0.0026768993,0.0018892068,0.000053717933,0.00018084786,0.012273992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8710729,0.09297607,0.005570789,0.0060045496,0.021418877,0.0029567848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.755792,0.20337132,0.011470306,0.019486869,0.008257625,0.0016218626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.093148306,0.0013659624,0.0020235819,0.0040527056,0.0054874606,0.009470399,0.0034683691,0.011976672,0.0030393172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18791436,0.001486248,0.0025226346,0.002364641,0.07827093,0.019661501,0.016845522,0.023560423,0.0003551436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003637314,0.00002363266,0.00037149142,0.00004040903,0.0000135302325,0.00009343673,0.002198007,0.00057416304,0.00007633629,0.98999375,0.000697346,0.0058815433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005013926,0.0000311945,0.00041576364,0.00018935485,0.000021110574,0.000080288526,0.0010823539,0.002843072,0.00042768082,0.9884177,0.0063927774,0.000048597612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048766043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045832857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093148306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010009015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008705251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49262124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124422298","doi":"","title":"Looking Back, Looking Forward: Feminist Legal Scholarship in SLS","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Feminism; Feminist legal theory; Feminist theory; Field (mathematics); Gender mainstreaming; Political science; Feminist philosophy; Sociology; Mainstreaming; Gender studies; Law; Gender equality","score_opus":0.02300540264376799,"score_gpt":0.30606309239937923,"score_spread":0.28305768975561124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124422298","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0078832125,0.66356415,0.0018103138,0.25196698,0.0030190896,0.000010985523,0.000036093697,0.000019797566,0.071689285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.354018,0.5351167,0.003675937,0.077482834,0.010252504,0.000096579264,0.00006865563,0.0001054206,0.019183349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99029595,0.0067539937,0.00026307965,0.00059996435,0.0015052622,0.0005817691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877154,0.010062161,0.0005190922,0.00024399973,0.0011269288,0.00033234796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010301953,0.00046662582,0.00061920687,0.0043753413,0.007396213,0.0093094325,0.0013829423,0.004348658,0.0043964046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0115860095,0.00030674832,0.00046724873,0.0046435846,0.032893397,0.012699932,0.004193119,0.007007292,0.0006035325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001134914,0.000017871977,0.00059810723,0.00067887636,0.00000803136,0.00021354257,0.03662627,0.00013160933,0.00011430568,0.8678356,0.026940208,0.06682424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049596197,0.000024454932,0.001255243,0.0067113703,0.000007732087,0.0002710129,0.049614247,0.0001554534,0.0002469406,0.17164907,0.7700362,0.000023415132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018887071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026227089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018887071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013470469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008832135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097735584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124444467","doi":"","title":"Cultural (In)Sensitivity: The Dangers of a Simplistic Approach to Culture in the Courtroom","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Legal culture; Sociology; Shadow (psychology); Construct (python library); Cultural sensitivity; Face (sociological concept); Law; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.01780000384139686,"score_gpt":0.29384217766080767,"score_spread":0.2760421738194108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124444467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19421552,0.02968391,0.075525455,0.3485543,0.0027936853,0.0001656054,0.000078798046,0.0001979759,0.34878471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96506774,0.005185162,0.006288277,0.018002732,0.0005461627,0.000084101346,0.000011515168,0.00008034533,0.0047341045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96875095,0.022550197,0.00078285875,0.0014436727,0.0051293243,0.0013430053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773406,0.0148642175,0.0019985687,0.0020028276,0.0028434852,0.00095024944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018985638,0.0008985881,0.0009816305,0.0035199898,0.017394057,0.021832258,0.003039648,0.0041079586,0.0019607681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026813382,0.00091079035,0.00045233182,0.0021903014,0.12683088,0.019318905,0.01504829,0.011209435,0.00040484313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023338205,0.000027584201,0.0023927386,0.00021996815,0.000034092063,0.00035039123,0.2593823,0.00045069837,0.00025002676,0.7062735,0.0034180195,0.027177304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020479218,0.00006929352,0.0032449267,0.0012735631,0.00006837202,0.0007414239,0.2576435,0.0011740918,0.00065480213,0.6188267,0.11618648,0.0000964844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051468037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047435988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051468037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013756539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012922242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10233694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124536723","doi":"","title":"Strange Encounters: Exploring Law and Film in the Affective Register","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Embodied cognition; Scholarship; Aesthetics; Affect (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); Relation (database); Reading (process); Ideology; Sociology; Politics; Representation (politics); Transformative learning; Psychology; Epistemology; Law; Art; Political science; Literature; Philosophy; Computer science; Communication","score_opus":0.023987389162274646,"score_gpt":0.28074711818379056,"score_spread":0.2567597290215159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124536723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72403103,0.00707018,0.008024636,0.017108168,0.00077353977,0.00007125061,0.00008629427,0.00008382238,0.24275109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99407744,0.0009611236,0.00044503086,0.00065632723,0.00014869792,0.000017026177,0.000018355397,0.000026501231,0.003649585],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695575,0.0023610576,0.000047416506,0.00015472902,0.00024843027,0.00023270547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972812,0.002106638,0.00023294041,0.000079269106,0.00009947031,0.00020043639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015878531,0.00038963414,0.00034938162,0.0015714181,0.00740938,0.009945462,0.0006815039,0.0018999043,0.0029807778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057929177,0.0002975437,0.00028890267,0.001115494,0.01601107,0.008358086,0.0048467224,0.003236037,0.00025323266],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062067156,0.000030808893,0.001506668,0.00012867374,0.0000118706275,0.0010963365,0.92297083,0.00007349516,0.0016554274,0.061881375,0.0020545737,0.008527862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021222038,0.000093743605,0.006380273,0.00023878849,0.000024264358,0.001029905,0.85897905,0.0003316828,0.000826881,0.025109531,0.106928445,0.000036281515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047096126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006966566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009945462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025921923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004982886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018807769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124714285","doi":"10.29173/alr145","title":"Film as a Complement to the Written Text: Reflections on Using &lt;i&gt;The Sterilization of Leilani Muir&lt;/i&gt; to Teach &lt;i&gt;Muir v. Alberta&lt;/i&gt;","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Law; Sociology; Eugenics; Imprisonment; Political science","score_opus":0.06704589877211421,"score_gpt":0.3429059030835949,"score_spread":0.2758600043114807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124714285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6564476,0.013029233,0.0037457936,0.067151345,0.0044685067,0.00034021816,0.00021298493,0.00013915029,0.2544652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9256428,0.008367777,0.0018426921,0.0077943546,0.00076454604,0.00016844565,0.00009131675,0.00025856835,0.055069488],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900305,0.007525752,0.00013885579,0.00038456035,0.0010177647,0.00090243836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98731273,0.010056504,0.0006370719,0.00033688007,0.00090355537,0.0007531592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066486667,0.0008146787,0.0007577766,0.0015355963,0.015863352,0.010510408,0.0019001864,0.003959958,0.008013184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022287859,0.0006995398,0.00045228394,0.0019431185,0.015037467,0.005382342,0.0060678143,0.0088332,0.0011138237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003982539,0.00009712174,0.00036674232,0.0001917405,0.000007424468,0.0016053248,0.9647887,0.000051430707,0.0012638904,0.009342084,0.011858984,0.010386752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018906765,0.00009386008,0.001030127,0.0003791433,0.000015693658,0.0005085339,0.84116393,0.00006545563,0.0007790693,0.0008200437,0.15510283,0.000022433824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036979835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072730474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96302015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008001897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039184755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073529184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124779421","doi":"","title":"‘I Made a Promise to a Lady’: Critical Legal Pluralism as Improvised Law in Buffy the Vampire Slayer","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Vampire; Legal realism; Legal pluralism; Law; Philosophy of law; Legal history; Sociology; Jurisprudence; Legal profession; Political science; Public law; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.0073318620897795915,"score_gpt":0.30266136761012224,"score_spread":0.29532950552034265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124779421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14583774,0.007681583,0.009246858,0.29369345,0.0031520254,0.000068297566,0.000031653093,0.00010388672,0.54018456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91059184,0.001290062,0.0018522663,0.020285545,0.0010616325,0.00006117517,0.000015366908,0.00011878823,0.06472335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996878,0.0018933354,0.000027611874,0.0002468845,0.00052075344,0.0004334944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973947,0.0019030144,0.00014581702,0.00011821478,0.00019028592,0.00024804616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00291074,0.00025955736,0.00028880517,0.0009533918,0.012910673,0.012050026,0.0009225273,0.004913526,0.0044196937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008008554,0.0002687287,0.0002489791,0.0007877012,0.0288939,0.008351505,0.0051509147,0.009261724,0.0005120631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001828231,0.000025942209,0.00025215096,0.000023158396,0.0000024175274,0.00031894632,0.07417297,0.00010210716,0.00013368424,0.8930203,0.024909426,0.0070206015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026677357,0.00004040808,0.0009732321,0.00039558794,0.000006999833,0.0002821572,0.11813202,0.0010193336,0.0004738335,0.3799485,0.49865738,0.000043908545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011044116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017391652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012910673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073291697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035674027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05317706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124810699","doi":"10.1017/s1744552317000180","title":"Representing Canadian justice: legal iconography and symbolism at the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Iconography; Supreme court; Law; Legal culture; Sociology; Politics; Premise; Economic Justice; Democracy; Legal history; Political science; History; Art history; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.023210687881393872,"score_gpt":0.3129553996394149,"score_spread":0.289744711758021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124810699","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4017484,0.004967201,0.0034252678,0.044681486,0.0007265874,0.00006805043,0.0005689867,0.00011666513,0.54369736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828166,0.00072636956,0.00048226622,0.00076283,0.000022653352,0.000008258872,0.000042799682,0.000029934354,0.015108222],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970962,0.00067851355,0.00004372292,0.00028754823,0.0009826139,0.0009113626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996816,0.0010131851,0.00017053077,0.00013533996,0.0011208788,0.0007440554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017470839,0.0005323193,0.00041611388,0.003058417,0.04569801,0.015079843,0.00182423,0.0021840534,0.010449366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047181454,0.00028086625,0.0002736053,0.0044159833,0.032943614,0.002640216,0.004114942,0.0035549407,0.00031284272],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051997093,0.000026017036,0.0056397202,0.000106114945,0.000017992901,0.0013274417,0.5678062,0.0006859465,0.0011804096,0.35194948,0.040301614,0.03090711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008316707,0.000024564139,0.013243371,0.00030265065,0.000033284952,0.00039584783,0.4684493,0.0008153912,0.0006809987,0.014717684,0.50118786,0.00014080683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9938584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15211013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15211013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11883998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98343205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124812233","doi":"","title":"Causation, Common Sense, and the Common Law: Replacing Unexamined Assumptions with What We Know About Male Violence Against Women, or, from Jane Doe to Bonnie Mooney","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Law; Appeal; Hearsay; Common law; Wife; Officer; Sociology; Domestic violence; Political science; Criminology; Poison control; Suicide prevention","score_opus":0.015395794389061525,"score_gpt":0.24036242242969105,"score_spread":0.22496662804062953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124812233","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0569713,0.059736203,0.20785308,0.52886885,0.003125754,0.000095627394,0.00013596982,0.0001358073,0.14307742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94971,0.011590624,0.012790442,0.018878808,0.0024798217,0.00015072469,0.00004203927,0.00005376418,0.004303711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97015554,0.01972842,0.0009839592,0.00280786,0.0046212864,0.001702924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94209427,0.04735891,0.003180834,0.0043327627,0.0021892295,0.00084406213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03346191,0.0007990291,0.0014242803,0.0050505656,0.008453498,0.011753232,0.0040764944,0.008240453,0.0022854588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038501956,0.00071897404,0.001246467,0.0029286668,0.16327706,0.030626874,0.009261714,0.012016699,0.0002546359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025029685,0.0000036690867,0.00011948668,0.000016380987,0.000003911732,0.000042016673,0.0014976143,0.00012658507,0.0000102443255,0.99634284,0.0004860869,0.0013485665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034444543,0.000005416294,0.00011069304,0.00009768012,0.0000034373663,0.000034558867,0.0009801629,0.00028569993,0.000036029214,0.9905009,0.007933814,0.000008044819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017072702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010636702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03346191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013080218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009173418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17696565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124824952","doi":"","title":"Casablanca: Judgment and Dynamic Enclaves in Law and Cinema","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Narrative; Movie theater; Law; Reading (process); Sociology; Aesthetics; Political science; Visual arts; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.010356037640239887,"score_gpt":0.2740408615088078,"score_spread":0.2636848238685679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124824952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26858062,0.005507584,0.007153366,0.021966266,0.00041399794,0.00006686476,0.000119143195,0.00015810998,0.6960341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98956376,0.00051452924,0.0005730496,0.00026422358,0.000035646684,0.000017945931,0.000015634623,0.000024121915,0.00899116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982009,0.0012036168,0.000028429786,0.00017065697,0.00021000419,0.00018629504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985191,0.00081368565,0.00020393147,0.000131846,0.00015510857,0.0001762994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010329369,0.00035094377,0.00020510601,0.0012600854,0.009749179,0.00838536,0.0008632812,0.001378616,0.006132582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005431243,0.00019257441,0.0001440328,0.00096640526,0.01634817,0.0048190467,0.00339638,0.0021674023,0.00030530526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008858269,0.000032586504,0.0017025037,0.00016467684,0.000010842799,0.0011668977,0.440852,0.0003603877,0.0020322304,0.52460897,0.0100672785,0.0189131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001433369,0.000044588527,0.008175659,0.00036349968,0.00002157958,0.0010211132,0.25753334,0.0010355202,0.0015931738,0.047659773,0.6824704,0.00006702742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05149192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06957455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05149192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00707858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018880762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10238439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124870406","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1486","title":"The Little Sisters Case, Administrative Censorship, and Obscenity Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.054456453502296755,"score_gpt":0.33095015268097056,"score_spread":0.2764936991786738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124870406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21963444,0.0042111464,0.0014306986,0.06228057,0.0003334759,0.00002417429,0.000077237935,0.000029214038,0.71197903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92726946,0.001095856,0.00019499847,0.009702332,0.00025144807,0.000022510758,0.000019662732,0.000016163789,0.06142759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985489,0.00039351406,0.00003303974,0.00015327494,0.00040184872,0.00046926714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788624,0.0012906077,0.00022187577,0.00012896596,0.000182949,0.00028931323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002050412,0.00020391635,0.00029934023,0.0010542646,0.011203928,0.005535892,0.0009753728,0.0057402994,0.008935396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0086190915,0.00025602157,0.00024779193,0.0015492168,0.019972276,0.003630634,0.0034134893,0.0052114516,0.0005284136],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011127382,0.00001166372,0.0012677269,0.00001133439,0.0000025337301,0.00030594526,0.006083334,0.000027702563,0.000061647734,0.9796045,0.010058948,0.002553525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010451802,0.00006222412,0.008565138,0.0005386459,0.00004661261,0.0011137866,0.028297454,0.00060520304,0.0011353713,0.5717795,0.38769513,0.00005642025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062092166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13582572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062092166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006370506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051076994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123461485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125085862","doi":"","title":"Justice Bastarache, the Charter and Judging: Principled Pragmatism and the Centrality of Equality","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Economic Justice; Political science; Human rights; Centrality; Pragmatism; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0756186409083321,"score_gpt":0.3288960520722168,"score_spread":0.2532774111638847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125085862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08071517,0.015859768,0.025383288,0.427719,0.0019879614,0.00007664423,0.00004909775,0.00008802595,0.44812098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95135736,0.0012711223,0.0047185845,0.016600322,0.0002596951,0.00003793321,0.000008143611,0.000036200057,0.025710665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98788804,0.00677647,0.0003245591,0.0011322113,0.0023762006,0.0015025706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99353504,0.0041118106,0.00040358183,0.0004824211,0.0010109841,0.0004561534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010845978,0.0002592403,0.0004586361,0.00082357717,0.016894849,0.010559982,0.0014381423,0.007903675,0.0016781659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015935244,0.00027971345,0.00027788573,0.00082329515,0.04899655,0.006920335,0.0041200165,0.010291705,0.0002269373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006915778,0.0000050620224,0.000120116216,0.000017741932,0.0000017823103,0.00005988558,0.011411769,0.00007354968,0.00007140519,0.976649,0.0069086524,0.004674211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000134921465,0.000033996068,0.0008377448,0.00020631845,0.0000076605,0.00019089326,0.013270948,0.00054920954,0.0005093279,0.8010841,0.1832496,0.000046760066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040744126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06002185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9592559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009383029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012672995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08101392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125242676","doi":"","title":"COMMON KNOWLEDGE, COMMUNICATION, AND PUBLIC REASON","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chicago-Kent law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Appeal; Silence; Metaphor; Law; Framing (construction); Set (abstract data type); Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Philosophy; Linguistics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.0377908360445267,"score_gpt":0.33940330779469574,"score_spread":0.30161247175016903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125242676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025525142,0.03764456,0.09658841,0.122488126,0.0007416309,0.00009189989,0.00010641417,0.00013226391,0.7166816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579063,0.010597,0.0072616693,0.0064476957,0.00088086526,0.00017157703,0.00005939249,0.000044134562,0.016631404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99201703,0.0047568423,0.0002664037,0.00075205165,0.0013187643,0.0008888422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908109,0.006519092,0.00075174426,0.00086855434,0.0006823804,0.0003673892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0102598155,0.00045169584,0.00066738855,0.0022869448,0.004595198,0.008635295,0.0014372761,0.0051387167,0.0063124048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011420745,0.0003278861,0.00065056875,0.0019706348,0.034661494,0.013286153,0.0042729164,0.0044780183,0.0006588506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013415801,0.0000022992292,0.000036684665,0.000011080859,0.0000018521629,0.000014687203,0.0002973024,0.000103882856,0.000007137548,0.9978188,0.0004951016,0.0012098762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004538292,0.0000054917737,0.000114748946,0.000055209945,0.000003924172,0.000033634486,0.00054465065,0.00021210668,0.000035939778,0.97087777,0.028106881,0.0000050805425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006408942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044121277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0102598155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007508715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054163113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054479778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125498858","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2008.10854409","title":"Re-Imagining Equality: Meaning and Movement","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"University of Oxford; Harvard University; Princeton University","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Argument (complex analysis); Movement (music); Presentation (obstetrics); Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07310688465482615,"score_gpt":0.3374553730261241,"score_spread":0.264348488371298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125498858","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06337689,0.007266549,0.10287424,0.098972075,0.0017356566,0.00010102327,0.000059790527,0.00015002924,0.7254637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95386857,0.001940547,0.009266364,0.0038457364,0.00036656886,0.0001576874,0.00003501003,0.00018471692,0.030334713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97320694,0.020269545,0.00047932047,0.0016852205,0.0029514635,0.0014075167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98865896,0.007587228,0.0008603943,0.001410031,0.0007413117,0.00074211456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018337473,0.0008064451,0.0008234866,0.002315852,0.012891096,0.018874465,0.002643812,0.0060134265,0.0076716808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021980101,0.00045783803,0.0007783444,0.0016089864,0.1287797,0.028172486,0.021855565,0.008842163,0.000994323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008189705,0.000006992111,0.00010440251,0.000041600153,0.0000024263384,0.000064844404,0.08797763,0.00008538493,0.00019424467,0.90622276,0.0010518644,0.004239636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014249939,0.000032036383,0.00026478205,0.00036732614,0.000007440493,0.00018225751,0.1016011,0.0003132814,0.0006372594,0.7126847,0.18386984,0.000025833222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037373921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019050809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018874465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006237327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004984823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09697896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125600852","doi":"10.1080/13200968.2008.10854403","title":"Flesh, Bones and Other Matters","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Feminist Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Soul; Virtue; Aesthetics; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.044792569128255265,"score_gpt":0.30987218436572456,"score_spread":0.2650796152374693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125600852","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017241563,0.011730593,0.0005896342,0.046218924,0.009332118,0.000027469125,0.00015991068,0.00009555663,0.93012166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061409097,0.005266083,0.00032695653,0.021875087,0.0044067865,0.000037116577,0.00016351303,0.00029253837,0.9062229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972115,0.0009425254,0.0001018681,0.00049826014,0.00069241517,0.0005534236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794656,0.0004741002,0.0001282364,0.00053736044,0.0003329198,0.0005809094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018052455,0.0007477956,0.00061444443,0.0010193047,0.008825163,0.014668844,0.0014101993,0.004255989,0.15309757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008088498,0.0002875227,0.00033359413,0.0013164055,0.016350048,0.011602589,0.0094519155,0.005139704,0.062246814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019839508,0.000021546797,0.00026802628,0.00009035252,0.000005772993,0.00018795667,0.008594326,0.00002277615,0.00011809223,0.48153016,0.46636066,0.042780578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018141453,0.000004182017,0.00011521187,0.00012390301,0.0000010189649,0.00007678426,0.0035712833,0.00000712307,0.000023219973,0.013059332,0.98301345,0.0000027324572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067716846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011548016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15309757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032208303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038051323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5121624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125673620","doi":"","title":"Let's Talk about Sexual Assault: Survivor Stories and the Law in the Jian Ghomeshi Media Discourse","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Criminal justice; Sexual violence; Law; Parallels; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0138058992467361,"score_gpt":0.30728690814979975,"score_spread":0.29348100890306367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125673620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68695,0.005855577,0.0011272372,0.13767579,0.0013872768,0.00007913994,0.00018844403,0.00010872728,0.1666278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95169955,0.0033550223,0.00032938598,0.006945979,0.00038087074,0.000054800654,0.000052019972,0.00005910182,0.037123203],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874747,0.00058016373,0.000026153382,0.00006306822,0.00027504595,0.0003080777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772555,0.0012299033,0.00019513772,0.00008955296,0.00022269024,0.00053715124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016500353,0.00071895553,0.0003699751,0.0011542371,0.027153822,0.006992446,0.0011980874,0.0039659245,0.005625411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004389931,0.00036535916,0.00024526002,0.0015857598,0.017671792,0.0052208095,0.0039166147,0.006203717,0.00048576575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014334758,0.000022478904,0.0010380455,0.00006193669,0.000004204439,0.0016230796,0.9624137,0.000038335103,0.00045391862,0.021129427,0.009736528,0.0034639654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038860726,0.000022214097,0.0014506134,0.00012311642,0.00000865827,0.00058013084,0.8332335,0.000067862624,0.00040297813,0.0022513666,0.16183142,0.000024315024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1083174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17622854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1083174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008974735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005703354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21537387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125693285","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3158463","title":"The Improvising Judge: An Interview with Her Honour Judge Patricia Smyth, Northern Ireland County Court","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Improvisation; Law; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.012310019512490137,"score_gpt":0.27795626283198777,"score_spread":0.26564624331949765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125693285","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35893705,0.0027598164,0.0017240456,0.53099847,0.0044087586,0.00054665236,0.00011030089,0.00016228572,0.100352496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69536275,0.0017258136,0.0011132912,0.18570518,0.0010140447,0.00033884533,0.00007491614,0.00031452742,0.114350595],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855299,0.005638591,0.0005620289,0.0013608554,0.0022851108,0.00462351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96761596,0.0142115345,0.0014696983,0.0006071749,0.0048010745,0.011294701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073362538,0.0006248549,0.0014296984,0.001437923,0.06879896,0.014527855,0.0046762973,0.027564127,0.010496379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055303328,0.0017014408,0.0005975179,0.0013059133,0.012494176,0.005860608,0.005785469,0.055326473,0.0023550729],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010738068,0.00024811237,0.004083181,0.00012492435,0.000030155186,0.034024842,0.7455315,0.00025670766,0.0016752402,0.0073255063,0.19691099,0.0096814325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010898964,0.00006028019,0.0021105488,0.00018411379,0.000010887994,0.001836497,0.88,0.00021736337,0.0002560119,0.0009103534,0.11433846,0.00006456785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2292458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44832352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2292458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021828832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031117164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45582283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125750742","doi":"10.21991/c9q375","title":"A Delicate Balance: Re Charkaoui and the Constitutional Dimensions of Disclosure","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.030218855735044212,"score_gpt":0.2665382592094107,"score_spread":0.2363194034743665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125750742","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007999086,0.06225196,0.0029887964,0.90953654,0.005883126,0.000013213303,0.000026215237,0.00002930476,0.018471068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1624841,0.05174076,0.0072451457,0.7007546,0.048946917,0.00026516378,0.000045436394,0.00020916155,0.028308634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96210873,0.021090535,0.0021226325,0.0037971328,0.0091195395,0.0017614216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94303864,0.04747857,0.0020287808,0.0027231115,0.003579816,0.0011510144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04009681,0.00073865696,0.0017484275,0.0019639584,0.0077257864,0.016939979,0.0035574548,0.051469177,0.004581834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07899694,0.00092625205,0.00069481187,0.0019766535,0.07007726,0.04259355,0.0064891027,0.051836222,0.0015200828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015564134,0.00001392807,0.00008465968,0.000075124444,0.000007270372,0.000057112768,0.0028206296,0.00006618483,0.000045128323,0.876627,0.108018234,0.012169192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027907547,0.000007681744,0.000118975775,0.00049599534,0.000008129277,0.0001645631,0.001455885,0.00013169367,0.00014291165,0.713689,0.2836953,0.00006208056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008297184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00878666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051469177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067786737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0138882855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21205473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125756532","doi":"","title":"A Reflection on Section 2(b)’s Quixotic Journey, 1982-2012","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Jurisprudence; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Sociology; Economic Justice; Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Law and economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.037437227247370496,"score_gpt":0.3146449141980431,"score_spread":0.2772076869506726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125756532","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021231957,0.008381121,0.002379046,0.6698615,0.023809958,0.0001051607,0.00024305328,0.00008715169,0.27390102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13690074,0.0043128324,0.0015853038,0.27245265,0.0036769735,0.00020233906,0.00014150757,0.00022086935,0.5805068],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667203,0.0011391205,0.000105311796,0.00032889843,0.0009696001,0.00078505446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818355,0.00078168337,0.0000755994,0.00006663351,0.00052461325,0.0003678713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005012871,0.00035739425,0.00027787674,0.00067171716,0.013967533,0.008813495,0.00091753417,0.011353404,0.014192306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009561237,0.00041087577,0.00048101292,0.0008331109,0.006378017,0.0058904937,0.0038386327,0.017159434,0.002895609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003795896,0.000085844375,0.00046439262,0.00008491939,0.0000020102743,0.00094157254,0.05747956,0.00012879321,0.0007113041,0.22519903,0.690698,0.024166606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029312414,0.000013488198,0.0005741003,0.00009965432,7.064278e-7,0.000086728935,0.0081605865,0.000024562209,0.00016152185,0.005201928,0.9856587,0.000015050718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06960445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10891732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06960445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012105499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013368368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13839865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125803310","doi":"","title":"Impact of the Feminist Judgment Writing Projects: The Case of the Women’s Court of Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal writing; Gender studies; Psychology; Sociology; Legal research","score_opus":0.16198706582751152,"score_gpt":0.5244312612879541,"score_spread":0.3624441954604426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125803310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.085249,0.0125118485,0.0012237126,0.31946874,0.004345196,0.00017203273,0.00031308105,0.00006318455,0.57665324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8028351,0.005838683,0.0010134147,0.07806604,0.0015481986,0.00015477499,0.00015295635,0.00014920905,0.110241644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91905016,0.019098986,0.0017256486,0.0044305944,0.038004644,0.017690042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92888695,0.031512875,0.002576178,0.0018823848,0.024415724,0.010725929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031797525,0.00064889994,0.00092726346,0.003969554,0.09917418,0.0276982,0.005270528,0.014661609,0.006278527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0846148,0.0009700111,0.00082301866,0.0069718594,0.03238518,0.0066578058,0.010712767,0.018469248,0.0006216724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006721545,0.00007082163,0.0042594373,0.00027431344,0.00006525925,0.0049861902,0.15871005,0.0006242526,0.0004133687,0.5916625,0.20275392,0.036112715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067103436,0.00004079873,0.008146186,0.0010646859,0.00011439374,0.0006017825,0.13851295,0.00069008453,0.00077468366,0.030508677,0.81922114,0.0002575357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9688796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9837159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8262093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17379071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29805318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9582857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125803445","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3412248","title":"Institutional Ethnography as a Method of Inquiry for Criminal Justice and Socio-Legal Studies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Criminology; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.04921889005430359,"score_gpt":0.39926890197525294,"score_spread":0.35005001192094937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125803445","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20410386,0.012165421,0.496158,0.012729864,0.0009593817,0.0036344477,0.0022549871,0.0005065876,0.26748753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81664,0.0036021036,0.1631558,0.00091611344,0.00020369196,0.0050269496,0.0003978689,0.00017044634,0.009887031],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.939706,0.057140626,0.00080942566,0.00081686245,0.00090713036,0.00061985495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8883945,0.099624604,0.0027136984,0.00620656,0.0020045638,0.001056081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028463433,0.000569771,0.0009658281,0.009554687,0.006133408,0.008254452,0.0019622329,0.0012932923,0.008205516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035958007,0.0005834959,0.00039892757,0.008698814,0.015256019,0.009975741,0.00555247,0.0016976859,0.0004955416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012232234,0.00029167527,0.01969755,0.0009890097,0.00007166635,0.00045117893,0.24289607,0.0007013674,0.0007943555,0.6153823,0.0063802944,0.11222221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010631905,0.0003021027,0.012109549,0.002464905,0.00009160469,0.0006330816,0.59154713,0.0035201958,0.001605581,0.2738196,0.113703504,0.000096446965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00804732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014031603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028463433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004104178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008572333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15053087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125856793","doi":"","title":"Jamming the Law: Improvisational Theatre and the ‘Spontaneity’ of Judgment","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Statute; Law; Faith; Political science; Aesthetics; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.023428263207825522,"score_gpt":0.2933850017635371,"score_spread":0.26995673855571156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125856793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16084518,0.0030941926,0.06689269,0.056336395,0.001833259,0.0000996213,0.00006791529,0.00044282104,0.71038795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772718,0.0003601571,0.003389751,0.0012890222,0.00021851019,0.000037277947,0.000015059612,0.00013635369,0.017282028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98502445,0.011475208,0.00020635725,0.0006233369,0.0018001967,0.0008704427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98130816,0.013050372,0.0014376891,0.002003827,0.0012486965,0.0009512138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010786842,0.00040320662,0.00028992002,0.00091016316,0.008716071,0.013395604,0.0013907758,0.0023338944,0.0071222982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028417528,0.00035375697,0.00037377354,0.0006467304,0.05024314,0.008740669,0.00766244,0.0059152343,0.0011326832],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007339266,0.00003192533,0.00061709614,0.00012219186,0.0000082178585,0.00037568386,0.19184896,0.00050594134,0.001442765,0.7748308,0.010822745,0.019320322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052831754,0.00013577333,0.001477606,0.00042339775,0.0000133241665,0.00067719544,0.12961066,0.0034157264,0.0031908287,0.48953745,0.3713612,0.000104062005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029452061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036724706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013395604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038758402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028658488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05704695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126105319","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2978","title":"Have We Legalized Corruption? The Impacts of Expanding Municipal Authority Without Safeguards in Toronto and Ontario","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Language change; Predictability; Government (linguistics); Politics; Power (physics); Certainty; Rule of law; Abuse of power; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Public economics; Public administration; Economics","score_opus":0.05135214084547056,"score_gpt":0.35937495423602234,"score_spread":0.30802281339055176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126105319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.936653,0.0011979784,0.00023405638,0.024311638,0.000091169764,0.00006650952,0.00031373714,0.000021394679,0.037110455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935622,0.000497737,0.00009214729,0.0007442522,0.000013739919,0.000018183298,0.00006366199,0.000007454658,0.005000651],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930361,0.0013109156,0.00020622485,0.00034769112,0.0014682818,0.0036308176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875245,0.001836478,0.00232606,0.0004928321,0.0030678322,0.004752211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002189345,0.00017108407,0.0004361219,0.00079072604,0.021905009,0.005111978,0.0016312329,0.0014674977,0.0049400735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012796131,0.0004229558,0.00039611405,0.0025745793,0.01038233,0.0018088691,0.0042377,0.0023344762,0.00022596483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046488503,0.00023046302,0.5209362,0.00042303183,0.00017214967,0.0042816433,0.25752297,0.0029715297,0.0017833574,0.12399003,0.03990084,0.04732293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069005575,0.00010573788,0.6657235,0.00033793686,0.000093481256,0.00024582754,0.25182226,0.0010492159,0.00054537714,0.004132128,0.07577185,0.00010364716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9957004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99875486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1864932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1864932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17060834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94355255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126108678","doi":"","title":"The Cook, the Mediator, the Feminist, and the Hero","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Mediation; Legitimacy; Feminism; Construct (python library); Jurisprudence; Power (physics); Patriarchy; Sociology; HERO; Resistance (ecology); Feminist philosophy; Gender studies; Narrative structure; Political science; Law; Art; Social science; Literature; Computer science","score_opus":0.014889076944834587,"score_gpt":0.2398905345624997,"score_spread":0.2250014576176651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126108678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18039535,0.024026288,0.018273052,0.080717884,0.00077384664,0.00011907568,0.00012678695,0.00011047665,0.6954572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9059747,0.0040793433,0.0025558767,0.0024603535,0.00010263119,0.00008653926,0.000021077507,0.00006434095,0.084655195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783355,0.001656583,0.00002461698,0.0001468457,0.00015091382,0.0001875028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981755,0.0012602328,0.00011944498,0.00013486546,0.00013030635,0.00017959224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002411916,0.00041899495,0.00026540333,0.0009815065,0.008495102,0.0070420424,0.0006408265,0.0024502245,0.008103363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030894936,0.00033048843,0.00021719458,0.00086299086,0.02672861,0.005582371,0.0032342118,0.0039349305,0.0005637285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003877781,0.000014189629,0.00053545716,0.00009520069,0.000005179124,0.00030167075,0.13814595,0.000051557876,0.00024411829,0.84999883,0.005783368,0.00478565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042151732,0.00006066371,0.0020555186,0.0006314926,0.000027356265,0.0010030684,0.2809424,0.00031798065,0.0011422357,0.15697071,0.5567708,0.000035586796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015663201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024203384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015663201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004300756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004777491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031204343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126309087","doi":"10.3138/cjfs-2020-0071","title":"The Affects of Animosity: Action Cinema, Enemy Making, and Moral Indignation as Film Mood","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Film Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Indignation; Art; Movie theater; Philosophy; Art history; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05003290422582127,"score_gpt":0.32661263959421877,"score_spread":0.27657973536839753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126309087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6818533,0.002772246,0.005654349,0.00865873,0.00023551892,0.000081070655,0.00011034907,0.000034914443,0.30059952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994249,0.0005720402,0.00056195795,0.00030451673,0.00006865818,0.000029394114,0.000016606662,0.00001785598,0.0041800393],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989718,0.0006432237,0.00002749628,0.00008505292,0.00017032505,0.00010209484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962058,0.0024757679,0.00063128857,0.0001262346,0.0003102853,0.00025051174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015048311,0.00030158376,0.00020417744,0.0009975672,0.0017563557,0.0081533715,0.00057508866,0.0011547678,0.0056993966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070218756,0.0002346505,0.00021055556,0.00060884835,0.005181246,0.0039708833,0.0022592957,0.001837228,0.00023418068],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002901457,0.00021076616,0.025795095,0.00057249004,0.000054827142,0.0008552991,0.55003124,0.00045399647,0.01177501,0.37021214,0.00373965,0.036009286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010874823,0.00044398612,0.27788785,0.0009649314,0.00018897431,0.0015538407,0.40941536,0.0030768716,0.0055093532,0.15109727,0.14956906,0.00018376116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031701305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038306834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0081533715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002186373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005522986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019066393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126613756","doi":"10.29173/alr2616","title":"At the Bridge: James Teit and An Anthropology of Belonging, Wendy Wickwire — A Collective Review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Sociology; Politics; Bridge (graph theory); Narrative; Solidarity; Indigenous; Situated; Anthropology; Law; Political science; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.0419163343825326,"score_gpt":0.3912213586769431,"score_spread":0.34930502429441046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126613756","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064847205,0.9580215,0.00030906673,0.031253446,0.0052395854,0.0000078667235,0.000011738723,0.00000740992,0.00450079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017074037,0.95114577,0.00050632935,0.01474658,0.008617611,0.00006362541,0.000044660996,0.000048300462,0.007753199],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962968,0.0021487942,0.0001650092,0.0003177516,0.00081318896,0.00025845369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99177635,0.006022203,0.00042811912,0.0002119705,0.0010787288,0.0004826787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004968528,0.00085180416,0.0010961023,0.005523172,0.0058830935,0.009100435,0.0015371661,0.0046428354,0.0022387176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012494446,0.0006575026,0.00041472923,0.009584357,0.011026157,0.011822114,0.004104361,0.006401285,0.0010450423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046778332,0.0000700402,0.000705473,0.004826243,0.000064077874,0.00045733707,0.042339217,0.00024833184,0.0001843929,0.17088625,0.6081144,0.17205736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025316467,0.000013415843,0.00068919593,0.0053845155,0.000012822001,0.00021412577,0.009050428,0.000031157095,0.00007020261,0.010294709,0.97421527,0.000021694206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017407347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026978524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017407347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005633216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00900148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040872037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128117600","doi":"10.3138/cras-2020-010","title":"<i>Breaking Bad</i> and <i>Better Call Saul</i>: Struggling and Living in Liquid Times","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Capitalism; Modernity; Normative; Individuation; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Psychology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.015088172208704143,"score_gpt":0.30139053019516465,"score_spread":0.28630235798646053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128117600","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13148604,0.1923892,0.00084920146,0.41701853,0.005719624,0.00005334022,0.00009505622,0.00006883173,0.25232017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77277744,0.14713925,0.0005492845,0.041259367,0.0021313566,0.00009591905,0.000089726265,0.00009551011,0.035862096],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986298,0.00058630283,0.000027524193,0.0000773892,0.00024059595,0.00043848343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840575,0.00043737053,0.0001828839,0.000052366642,0.00021656862,0.0007050241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017849548,0.000324123,0.00046369183,0.0017944418,0.013977723,0.007867914,0.0010096384,0.0022419025,0.0034374748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023732143,0.00022428461,0.00025294165,0.0024184783,0.023842026,0.008143421,0.00341377,0.0057012048,0.0005779697],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030779272,0.00012029618,0.0046895454,0.0004069674,0.000021688558,0.00089434005,0.36839205,0.000059859874,0.0002723463,0.21282484,0.33772314,0.07456421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005581361,0.000022519202,0.008561773,0.00067934726,0.000009197258,0.00057044806,0.46055576,0.000037362493,0.00009447858,0.017260877,0.5121754,0.000027321745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.095526785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22230463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095526785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009675817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009661165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18994153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128251491","doi":"","title":"Editors' Introduction to Index Volume 2 (2020)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Volume (thermodynamics); Regional science; Computer science; Geography; Physics; Thermodynamics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.008411332723855776,"score_gpt":0.25584414808766864,"score_spread":0.24743281536381287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128251491","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012375644,0.008883406,0.000625716,0.01851585,0.8762786,0.00016150122,0.001595846,0.00067826203,0.093137026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00094411214,0.011767084,0.000640301,0.024853578,0.4330683,0.00023623835,0.001974814,0.0008040542,0.5257115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787545,0.00021492466,0.00022504499,0.00026770285,0.0012172862,0.00019960446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99132615,0.0013133179,0.0005399601,0.0003506307,0.0045761815,0.0018936981],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002073726,0.0028625668,0.0022869022,0.0063023847,0.0021443611,0.0101716025,0.0028329878,0.004844591,0.45071325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009852335,0.000838883,0.0016085452,0.004805249,0.0008792665,0.0045669507,0.0035381604,0.0041173683,0.3874704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009554111,0.0000054932866,0.000012204836,0.00010957046,0.0000010851918,0.000011405456,0.000004028395,0.000012840606,0.00004639859,0.00015754133,0.98874706,0.010882774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007964635,0.000015791546,0.00014603476,0.00023752435,0.0000025406448,0.000029856323,0.00001522931,0.000026436608,0.00003195196,0.0004833854,0.9989956,0.000007696977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002047442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049978504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45071325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018075866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017788986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7834909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128302199","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-56227-4_27","title":"The Erosion of Justice Symbolism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Harmony (color); Aesthetics; Law; Sociology; Secrecy; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.024996359454793535,"score_gpt":0.28251832083885886,"score_spread":0.2575219613840653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128302199","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052684327,0.0030971619,0.0032036111,0.014403334,0.0003506197,0.000011093505,0.000020872056,0.000021922428,0.973623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7095989,0.0033640203,0.0027033745,0.006857505,0.001305643,0.00010784125,0.000038912443,0.0001767879,0.27584702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758124,0.001215586,0.000041624644,0.000235884,0.00061716203,0.0003084145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976482,0.0013904433,0.00012172742,0.0003710135,0.0003343948,0.00013415451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025489077,0.00035261537,0.0005393619,0.00136418,0.0055308435,0.01062936,0.0010897819,0.003874364,0.006847042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005167981,0.00033443797,0.00023959228,0.0011802067,0.050501626,0.009641999,0.0039286953,0.008899365,0.0010777042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012331503,0.0000024667156,0.000011190414,0.0000032437574,4.2188663e-7,0.000007686747,0.0009633079,0.00001416665,0.000011970886,0.99559194,0.0020137904,0.0013785096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040113305,0.0000047254025,0.000118953234,0.000042824635,0.000001517081,0.000052853888,0.0009682278,0.00012658643,0.00007934073,0.91804314,0.08055221,0.000005591943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007034748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0100976955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01062936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053594057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042904075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038885415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129664191","doi":"","title":"ҚИЛМИШНИ КВАЛИФИКАЦИЯ ҚИЛИШДА ЖИНОЯТ ТАРКИБИ ЗАРУРИЙ ВА ФАКУЛЬТАТИВ БЕЛГИЛАРИНИНГ ЎРНИ: ТАҲЛИЛ ВА ТАКЛИФ","year":2020,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"ЖУРНАЛ ПРАВОВЫХ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Criminal code; Law; Political science; The Republic; Facultative; Criminal law","score_opus":0.0337736073836512,"score_gpt":0.28900377368273555,"score_spread":0.25523016629908435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129664191","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036713284,0.009866845,0.77872103,0.0056850486,0.0014293374,0.0010127941,0.000790103,0.0005501702,0.16523142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51524657,0.008765412,0.44343108,0.0010367607,0.00061419606,0.0018109946,0.0006677505,0.00023100963,0.02819621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933509,0.003359397,0.0004761658,0.0011030906,0.0015302442,0.00018012544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894748,0.0064994697,0.00086395367,0.0012207123,0.001785596,0.00015549765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007464355,0.00063967286,0.0006125972,0.0033067116,0.0022769244,0.004472151,0.0008044377,0.000870593,0.009043945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016736705,0.00037696207,0.0007814446,0.0038869109,0.0068515507,0.0050039934,0.0016085315,0.0016501554,0.0031482351],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007684104,0.00008133294,0.004001912,0.00080612896,0.00005257954,0.00024572958,0.006162677,0.0010133359,0.0012942668,0.7797494,0.005128585,0.20138717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004448603,0.0001677584,0.005049206,0.0007147746,0.00010162686,0.00063535577,0.005667835,0.0062678787,0.0064597544,0.7500246,0.22479637,0.00007036185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018274611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018883313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009043945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00260626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004147352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03947574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130113359","doi":"","title":"Book Reviews and Notices: Sonu Bedi, Beyond Race, Sex, and Sexual Orientation: Legal Equality Without Identity (Cambridge University Press, 2013)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual orientation; Race (biology); Identity (music); Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.012298629298393442,"score_gpt":0.2813068692389374,"score_spread":0.26900823994054396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130113359","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018132226,0.82031494,0.00041430967,0.044358112,0.04740115,0.000042512263,0.00047087602,0.00012702389,0.08668971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003020089,0.50940806,0.000669014,0.034442607,0.04269368,0.00013042745,0.0007356867,0.0002517145,0.4086487],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893385,0.00015338462,0.000060803948,0.00013604802,0.0006396093,0.000076276294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99731535,0.0011363728,0.00020832072,0.00008485716,0.0010036291,0.0002515038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093565095,0.001180458,0.0013240114,0.0037670438,0.0014808071,0.003638987,0.0012540675,0.002466793,0.07525594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004419144,0.0005731953,0.000578982,0.0055551934,0.0014534136,0.0042950665,0.0018169952,0.0035805593,0.043609537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033849644,0.0000035001237,0.000015527758,0.00018380194,0.0000016047459,0.000008831593,0.00003293436,0.000012707916,0.000026220629,0.0010806478,0.9794708,0.019160131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030109677,0.000004515354,0.00016115366,0.0003502953,0.0000030690542,0.000056302924,0.000046388006,0.000013315035,0.000021808259,0.0006801612,0.9986546,0.000005316694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010660635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03108768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07525594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028675676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055187526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2517562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3130359410","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340073","title":"‘Throwing a Baby with Bathwater,’ Restoration of the Tanzanian Indigenous Justice System: The Case of Sukuma, Kinga and Iraqwi Ethnic Groups","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Economic Justice; Law; Ratification; Ceremony; Tanzania; Political science; Ethnic group; Sociology; History; Ethnology; Archaeology; Ecology; Politics","score_opus":0.03971230502355656,"score_gpt":0.30560923829304276,"score_spread":0.2658969332694862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130359410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.890942,0.0015649435,0.0007874394,0.041566733,0.00013119746,0.00006088961,0.000017270246,0.000012220199,0.06491734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99155957,0.00022907388,0.00022660749,0.0022759575,0.00001938869,0.00002191945,0.0000034666261,0.000006138296,0.005657966],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971534,0.0014544381,0.00003728535,0.0001070424,0.00012681908,0.001120975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975594,0.0011914442,0.00028181262,0.00010764094,0.00020643807,0.00065315026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036445651,0.00027832322,0.00027875183,0.0007251118,0.037050996,0.0047535393,0.0016563453,0.0049045444,0.006691802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054898732,0.00037604466,0.0002706316,0.00078260154,0.016319593,0.003134322,0.00611259,0.005239883,0.00025077187],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036881615,0.000062253544,0.0049449657,0.00009892903,0.000009933199,0.016188208,0.69814026,0.00022652725,0.000810711,0.26328903,0.0090283435,0.0071639256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026927402,0.00008626816,0.0092243645,0.00041836838,0.00002823631,0.0022663516,0.8730756,0.0006836636,0.00045641646,0.015108802,0.098581515,0.000043560634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13766816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3050377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13766816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01125984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009105132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27373368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131605917","doi":"10.7202/1076208ar","title":"Barbara Carnevali, \"Social Appearances: A Philosophy of Display and Prestige.\" Trans. Zakiya Hanafi","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prestige; Philosophy; Theology; Epistemology; Sociology; Religious studies; Linguistics","score_opus":0.049043198200649715,"score_gpt":0.3326327319700053,"score_spread":0.2835895337693556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131605917","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023308581,0.8675529,0.0006778729,0.11636836,0.0028132375,0.000011739291,0.00013725611,0.000025281435,0.012180279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024858512,0.871177,0.002189425,0.065403305,0.007011394,0.00017567084,0.00026868936,0.00010424752,0.02881164],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601775,0.0018082832,0.0002302599,0.00044162368,0.0012862858,0.0002158066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947331,0.003086948,0.0004367337,0.00015157786,0.0013242618,0.00026737928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004440175,0.0014388594,0.0010227486,0.0048137074,0.0037090706,0.0051650475,0.0020471672,0.0055322233,0.008604005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01018374,0.00097452424,0.00081830897,0.0046826424,0.00746919,0.012824812,0.0022139044,0.0068914783,0.004725204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000494942,0.000023395352,0.0004067106,0.0008683214,0.000039598417,0.000050060666,0.0020822978,0.000083723746,0.00007381685,0.112742186,0.8391289,0.044451497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000252652,0.000014913792,0.0026541871,0.0024880725,0.000035592355,0.00016593272,0.0013549275,0.00005946715,0.00014084463,0.09260996,0.9004177,0.00003321669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0511405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0760821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0511405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008530571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059394785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10168564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133517246","doi":"","title":"How Shakespeare’s Stories Set Us Free / Ewan Fernie, Shakespeare for Freedom: Why the Plays Matter. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017. Hardcover ISBN: 9781107130852.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Narrative Works","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Art; Media studies; Art history; Philosophy; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03639594802134137,"score_gpt":0.27840960512517204,"score_spread":0.24201365710383066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133517246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045340215,0.32352182,0.001971258,0.20996003,0.007086936,0.00002593051,0.00036585375,0.00009134349,0.45244285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21893372,0.16175015,0.0015487834,0.023423467,0.0027680958,0.00008574812,0.00043058457,0.00041848785,0.5906409],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998577,0.00078396423,0.000046403868,0.00011306318,0.0003105517,0.00016897355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837375,0.00096148765,0.00008931576,0.00008401137,0.00027692376,0.00021449679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022746453,0.0010659889,0.0004989521,0.001684888,0.009939337,0.010615712,0.00084636407,0.004040907,0.026834393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054585887,0.0005433112,0.00034443673,0.0014542914,0.012749365,0.013473433,0.003044568,0.004393008,0.0064679133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003201546,0.000013648589,0.00015084454,0.00024412184,0.000010609084,0.00028925852,0.03406624,0.00006256373,0.00008763245,0.20665567,0.73112696,0.027260356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004334758,0.0000033909787,0.0002471339,0.00052683096,0.0000029609973,0.00018946514,0.016147269,0.00002522514,0.00010549749,0.025471695,0.9572673,0.000008823566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033630945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07110144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033630945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004459846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035814818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08977002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134372073","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1009","title":"Book Review: Everyday Law on the Street: City Governance in an Age of Diversity, by Mariana Valverde","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Corporate governance; Law; Political science; Sociology; Geography; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.022975939995956637,"score_gpt":0.2673767208098702,"score_spread":0.24440078081391353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134372073","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008981025,0.8785632,0.00011771417,0.06970276,0.03925611,0.00002731235,0.00035060625,0.000027609303,0.011864884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017777331,0.8700935,0.00018544543,0.045016963,0.036680963,0.00008965871,0.00050337595,0.000062235034,0.045590222],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989008,0.00019432289,0.00009212595,0.00015425043,0.0005697182,0.00008882694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959264,0.0017109192,0.00022951598,0.00010005414,0.0016762782,0.00035691858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094317115,0.0010044015,0.0018024121,0.0029886016,0.0014727182,0.0057975193,0.0017361507,0.0036547587,0.01943978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008352042,0.0005765664,0.00047785477,0.008145959,0.002333791,0.0034058397,0.0013805052,0.0045211785,0.009158608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023621885,0.0000020972084,0.000020180289,0.00042093263,0.000003331515,0.000006140206,0.000024253186,0.000015201706,0.000008156271,0.00063625426,0.9910946,0.007766558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006540831,0.0000046620908,0.00029733471,0.0014484465,0.000007397467,0.000058598394,0.00007477301,0.000009811246,0.0000070929386,0.00048683456,0.9975923,0.0000061386027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058803294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14581558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058803294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070443535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011590576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11692202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134933462","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v15i2.2456","title":"Blind Visuality in Bruce Horak’s \"Through a Tired Eye\"","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Aesthetics; Blindness; Painting; Perception; Exhibition; Exposition (narrative); Visual arts; The arts; Sociology; Visual culture; Constructive; Psychology; Art; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14197449079719743,"score_gpt":0.4857603128221422,"score_spread":0.3437858220249448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134933462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30886146,0.010491987,0.0073062107,0.083943225,0.0018611841,0.00004198465,0.000065766086,0.00017004221,0.58725816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95568544,0.001200296,0.0009098572,0.003186345,0.00011639504,0.000013436569,0.000007018635,0.000062288054,0.03881891],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998667,0.0007206032,0.000022221493,0.00010936122,0.00023474368,0.00024599026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918956,0.0004260149,0.00008725896,0.00006696913,0.00010395475,0.00012613025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009969956,0.00031156075,0.00021000039,0.0006955731,0.0110771,0.0053545474,0.0004659078,0.0019374774,0.0044025304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025304337,0.00022334863,0.00021892315,0.00030901257,0.025702951,0.0032922549,0.0037871823,0.004076235,0.0005374226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007376898,0.000033407592,0.00093993935,0.00012778718,0.00000775372,0.0017304148,0.49297804,0.0001554167,0.002030972,0.4433378,0.0447458,0.01383885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018345663,0.00006314943,0.0027174356,0.0004889784,0.000014018059,0.003758326,0.25740117,0.00026198762,0.0020873924,0.075178444,0.6579373,0.00007348259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016956815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027377386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016956815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002592899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013384434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0337162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134995808","doi":"10.3138/utq.89.3.hr.58","title":"Tara Atluri. <i>Uncommitted Crimes: The Defiance of the Artistic Imagination</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Aesthetics; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Art; Sociology; Literature; History","score_opus":0.007444739603935128,"score_gpt":0.22134172476184394,"score_spread":0.2138969851579088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134995808","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014044549,0.41584376,0.00022363935,0.49376702,0.019537617,0.00002729655,0.00041544385,0.00009173616,0.068689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.091881596,0.34127602,0.0007982459,0.24525373,0.026327575,0.00019320009,0.00069082784,0.00023970842,0.2933392],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832577,0.00058238034,0.00012551146,0.00014193667,0.0005354924,0.00028885028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960224,0.0016850929,0.0005148978,0.00010517904,0.0011792589,0.0004931159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017542437,0.000989616,0.00048613673,0.0020041047,0.007697999,0.0068654264,0.0017618756,0.0064332113,0.013568645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005254428,0.00067536515,0.00042192527,0.0024698102,0.004476518,0.0069952016,0.0023249513,0.007515509,0.004534261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063214798,0.0000060002762,0.00016236065,0.000118672026,0.0000016393959,0.000052628962,0.0031544075,0.000009511909,0.000024735155,0.011684885,0.9787443,0.006034487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008375495,0.000011332043,0.004543852,0.00096054055,0.000008861831,0.0001601737,0.009157914,0.000037916005,0.00012216812,0.003615263,0.981351,0.000022536375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16931912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31808457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16931912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008361833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067656357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33666718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135202047","doi":"10.1177/1743872121999067","title":"Fitzpatrick and the Feminine Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Impossibility; Relation (database); Creativity; Originality; Poetry; Law; Law and literature; Scholarship; Reading (process); Philosophy; Sociology; Literature; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.02007353384658491,"score_gpt":0.24831687702651312,"score_spread":0.2282433431799282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135202047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01384407,0.03236384,0.0055752858,0.3427908,0.0018269407,0.000028944949,0.000051929324,0.000039455852,0.6034787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7834177,0.010448313,0.0025036305,0.06353565,0.0022963982,0.00014259048,0.000029789442,0.000109490684,0.13751645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962787,0.0020447797,0.00006427472,0.00047466892,0.0007367921,0.00040080244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981901,0.0013113772,0.00011673161,0.00010017355,0.00017485261,0.000106854386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021561596,0.0003854557,0.00031476846,0.0011537655,0.008097693,0.005840398,0.00094824407,0.0050090123,0.0055706142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054506524,0.00021536977,0.00029660962,0.0010956952,0.0300704,0.0054173414,0.0031960572,0.0056928424,0.0007291492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043401255,0.0000043435584,0.00004839708,0.0000141441715,8.9679963e-7,0.00008235691,0.0042658863,0.00003883604,0.00002324568,0.97578704,0.016393077,0.0033374708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008657434,0.000010727802,0.00041694165,0.00018737002,0.0000020936689,0.00023732886,0.0077532725,0.00017266173,0.000092939765,0.35426608,0.63683456,0.00001728976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022404147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019148422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022404147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077510276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033430103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056237936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135438145","doi":"10.2478/cl-2021-0002","title":"The Abyss of Meaning or the Cauldron of Signs: Meaning and Tertium Quid. Shakespeare as a Translator?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Legilinguistics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Interpreter; Interpretation (philosophy); Linguistics; Philosophy; Psychology; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07887971709497728,"score_gpt":0.3734245670006868,"score_spread":0.29454484990570956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135438145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048305266,0.054590907,0.011364923,0.33274102,0.018738372,0.000055083816,0.00020085492,0.00024319699,0.5337604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90599114,0.007549853,0.0021709697,0.009902516,0.002883835,0.000041227046,0.000065834276,0.00030125742,0.071093336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99682057,0.002230201,0.00011529051,0.0002474454,0.00037040535,0.00021612993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99470794,0.00334355,0.00025713135,0.00039244737,0.0009353968,0.00036357407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042696777,0.0006048581,0.00047629923,0.0014847768,0.005767379,0.0077653145,0.0007205592,0.002789096,0.00628019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010068877,0.00032856548,0.00020273996,0.0011301694,0.026605196,0.009231272,0.0025829289,0.006751395,0.0015612228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052973457,0.000014759184,0.00024038508,0.00019560436,0.0000058695996,0.00039604254,0.118354484,0.000097103984,0.0001953048,0.8052078,0.060339402,0.014900232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038437585,0.000078339195,0.00076811045,0.0010660487,0.00001419589,0.00052218186,0.061755158,0.00061851105,0.0007443015,0.23928557,0.69504845,0.000060715363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007955482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010251456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007955482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048110057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003438836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034906447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3136271386","doi":"10.5553/tijrj.000077","title":"Risk, restorative justice and the Crown","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Restorative Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crown (dentistry); Restorative justice; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Dentistry; Medicine","score_opus":0.025607737185276296,"score_gpt":0.3412448406266318,"score_spread":0.3156371034413555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3136271386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84485394,0.006272364,0.0010802526,0.025410082,0.00008986066,0.000058475784,0.000049942446,0.000018309758,0.12216681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945592,0.00072377344,0.00016426697,0.000372864,0.000006138082,0.000004675159,0.000005336735,0.0000047999774,0.0041587935],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611855,0.0010344492,0.00008277255,0.00023782122,0.0010862596,0.0014400973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99508435,0.0014109957,0.00080759666,0.00015967657,0.0011906481,0.0013466987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018873052,0.00024329663,0.00030370566,0.0014570534,0.030449761,0.008892835,0.0017526586,0.0019819527,0.002919562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007447199,0.00022658447,0.00024262046,0.0025067958,0.03704393,0.0021293934,0.0048392243,0.003269753,0.00011382524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037134134,0.00006479304,0.028208679,0.00013187387,0.000014025461,0.001480281,0.6873153,0.00054497406,0.0004693906,0.24608985,0.006740756,0.028903017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010655377,0.00003776726,0.06824088,0.0005309533,0.00002585803,0.00061125285,0.77791214,0.0004481256,0.00029522253,0.016455052,0.13535014,0.000081947815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9716632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9870803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9716632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11707373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12577368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8494333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137420801","doi":"","title":"The Subjects of Bhasin: Good Faith and Relational Theory","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Doctrine; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Legal doctrine; Private law; Sociology; Law and economics; Legislature; Common law; Public law","score_opus":0.010504887232125094,"score_gpt":0.2722345274306047,"score_spread":0.2617296401984796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137420801","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08103962,0.006757476,0.018669542,0.050568935,0.00027748183,0.000083168445,0.00003935341,0.0000394164,0.84252495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97654486,0.0010222741,0.002247541,0.0024806971,0.000072536386,0.000043661283,0.000015078896,0.000027312373,0.017545976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951096,0.0028320036,0.00007347266,0.00055742403,0.0007570093,0.00067060086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980635,0.00094716955,0.00017751082,0.0002608021,0.00022371435,0.00032729446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004539048,0.0003228573,0.00030276753,0.0012991861,0.014265966,0.010032587,0.0014414137,0.0031726994,0.0044438373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042392295,0.00029584765,0.00025076995,0.0012485095,0.096053764,0.0078894235,0.0070192297,0.0062309047,0.00044797212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016791854,0.0000023953733,0.000048033417,0.0000052753053,4.6943276e-7,0.000023147875,0.012309896,0.000018411922,0.000023593042,0.98634166,0.00026939306,0.0009561412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010052571,0.000015405163,0.00046185264,0.00013055235,0.0000042442366,0.00011209007,0.025030531,0.00028971737,0.00015224634,0.88867307,0.085107274,0.000013010509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.092908345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07320203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092908345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01737118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011401268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18473512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137486751","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1105","title":"Replaying the Past","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oñati Socio-legal Series","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Politics; Philosophy; Humanities; Sociology","score_opus":0.010854199699497018,"score_gpt":0.2603488785855173,"score_spread":0.24949467888602028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137486751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13423976,0.012702179,0.07459141,0.16470768,0.00773539,0.000063206826,0.00036616647,0.00045488763,0.60513926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92451537,0.0033391279,0.0113401245,0.011152203,0.0012990002,0.000047455993,0.00014930847,0.0003425693,0.047814723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99504846,0.002886709,0.00014100468,0.0007348517,0.0008542313,0.00033477708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99315614,0.0032871591,0.00075267116,0.0012243068,0.0011874109,0.00039243983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004932527,0.00049828144,0.00039991646,0.0015043776,0.006599843,0.008335313,0.0011788018,0.0039349734,0.009757348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017709743,0.0003421013,0.00049271417,0.00088185444,0.021039233,0.014563761,0.005472079,0.006992811,0.0016991405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007203437,0.000021399543,0.0014443598,0.00019097867,0.000028659822,0.00066403486,0.19408555,0.00035620798,0.0020219258,0.74607825,0.025522023,0.029514534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011174763,0.000045208144,0.0013737555,0.00043755877,0.00003305197,0.000735634,0.08229193,0.00095794635,0.0011182041,0.27283636,0.64009714,0.00006209159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002959743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004615159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009757348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038729303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011348963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03264153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137863000","doi":"","title":"Em busca de um paradigma: o debate escandinavo sobre a identidade da sociologia do direito / In search of a paradigm: the Scandinavian debate on the identity of sociology of law","year":2021,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology of law; Sociology; Identity (music); Humanities; Philosophy; Social science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.041391622374961315,"score_gpt":0.2981379371801631,"score_spread":0.2567463148052018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137863000","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09050437,0.065362014,0.0063815764,0.44196013,0.0035256734,0.000047203066,0.00007486477,0.000036596994,0.39210752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.930835,0.016674958,0.0028475777,0.016861962,0.001087893,0.000064807784,0.0000506712,0.000078829595,0.03149826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766491,0.016177293,0.00051976636,0.0017162682,0.0034631141,0.0014745404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836543,0.0104517,0.0015231088,0.0011265278,0.0021408547,0.0011035573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017637687,0.00059922395,0.0006522307,0.0034831779,0.016214117,0.027919902,0.0018581296,0.010801061,0.00595415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014007881,0.0005531476,0.00046680466,0.004410691,0.061789654,0.018329617,0.0069665797,0.008133413,0.0011032184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032149364,0.000030435473,0.0007025211,0.00016473216,0.000006723876,0.00027384798,0.08498074,0.00006416657,0.00021604954,0.8833875,0.011731544,0.01840971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002566679,0.00007143882,0.0032842811,0.0025623098,0.000018115868,0.00043108477,0.22959217,0.00031385678,0.00044579935,0.29810745,0.4650782,0.000069565394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026647765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042025227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027919902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014207879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01882452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103085876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137953979","doi":"","title":"Wench Tactics? Openings in Conditions of Closure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Welsh; Closure (psychology); Political science; Publishing; Sociology; Economic Justice; Law; Media studies; Public relations; Social psychology; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.06615465366637992,"score_gpt":0.41586681091657546,"score_spread":0.34971215725019555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137953979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34850413,0.0012209597,0.027267234,0.020102296,0.0005881525,0.00011588557,0.00069103896,0.00027397316,0.60123634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98912597,0.00010190506,0.00085515453,0.0002640059,0.00009038789,0.000048760703,0.000055877448,0.000056073364,0.009401911],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947227,0.0013888883,0.0003505568,0.0008832636,0.00073506415,0.0019195522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746363,0.014553299,0.0028568872,0.0034213602,0.0014726296,0.0030594876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044219582,0.00028638844,0.0009266832,0.002262483,0.0057869228,0.010692058,0.0011615466,0.0031862888,0.04863246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044981454,0.00058903306,0.00065886416,0.001972025,0.011374469,0.016639125,0.0074963304,0.0036397735,0.0024230913],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012493748,0.000024411593,0.0039522387,0.000036310437,0.000011201679,0.00033403514,0.006327618,0.00028015816,0.00029319053,0.9760459,0.0039511444,0.008618775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032489115,0.000046445046,0.005506588,0.00011691749,0.00001789991,0.00035248967,0.02230367,0.0012029667,0.00036956632,0.940965,0.029049784,0.000036295107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019598876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024226047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04863246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023381882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018895647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16269183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W313952586","doi":"","title":"Calder V. Attorney General of British Columbia; Aboriginal Case Law in an Ethnobiased Court","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of native studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Legal culture; Political science; Sociology; History; Ethnology; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03324644394292893,"score_gpt":0.3433107788757064,"score_spread":0.31006433493277746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W313952586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4375888,0.006471762,0.00068924134,0.03704134,0.00034384298,0.00010464211,0.000107851425,0.000021145232,0.5176314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96399873,0.0011608846,0.00019698004,0.0060684886,0.00007656359,0.00003161244,0.000013124921,0.000007844157,0.028445832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974063,0.00081251684,0.000050467952,0.00018139195,0.0005122818,0.0010370142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780077,0.00108812,0.00015041057,0.00008299161,0.00038163742,0.0004960963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019552566,0.00021038039,0.00021601078,0.0010004686,0.027129238,0.009826481,0.0010472803,0.0033724476,0.00394429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003159396,0.0003291888,0.00014110681,0.0020644502,0.01832213,0.0012084817,0.0027218305,0.0071433033,0.00017963516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008202903,0.00009708181,0.012504313,0.00011264093,0.000025190366,0.0076345867,0.18705723,0.0005121903,0.0016483215,0.73575675,0.041699156,0.012870491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007114678,0.000086636544,0.05440635,0.0012312849,0.00006848373,0.0012499546,0.3662418,0.0010745501,0.0014960561,0.07350173,0.5003034,0.00026855175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9568847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98476464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05529802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05529802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04723527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40121704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148872176","doi":"10.1017/9781139236249.007","title":"Dicey and the Art and Science of Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Dozen; Politics; Morality; Law; Political science; Sociology; Classics; History","score_opus":0.020825171333558736,"score_gpt":0.2165277947990316,"score_spread":0.19570262346547285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148872176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083406584,0.041540064,0.0009913173,0.013730833,0.0014071681,0.000011353884,0.00004969821,0.000035592133,0.9414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11562009,0.04512015,0.0035871414,0.011630421,0.0024359154,0.0001888087,0.00013048161,0.0001487425,0.8211382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987244,0.0004024114,0.000043238844,0.00022264931,0.0004566982,0.00015054764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988701,0.00062320754,0.000052334166,0.0001330876,0.00022847617,0.000092760856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097317784,0.0005969822,0.0005091752,0.0026640552,0.0074322973,0.009254792,0.00087610824,0.0026175953,0.021867132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039220336,0.00038881914,0.00020597166,0.0022180732,0.01378768,0.006056015,0.0029343492,0.00506173,0.0030968585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051375414,0.0000033127403,0.000033833676,0.000047400285,8.694018e-7,0.000032879903,0.00127852,0.000045072582,0.00002547886,0.9025809,0.083750054,0.012196409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025017816,0.0000037963612,0.00011097207,0.00014395271,0.0000010702004,0.000060243743,0.00043671418,0.000065977416,0.000037310812,0.08134427,0.9177897,0.0000034256927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016167527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029916791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021867132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0091256285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050836173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07315284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151143416","doi":"","title":"The Failure of Consent: Re-Conceptualizing Rape as Sexual Abuse of Power","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Harm; Wrongdoing; Criminology; Discretion; Empirical research; Political science; Voluntariness; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.025042225191164683,"score_gpt":0.2836523603782307,"score_spread":0.25861013518706605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151143416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06220668,0.048582107,0.045262042,0.33741894,0.002960977,0.00017530406,0.00023039042,0.00009300521,0.50307053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9543855,0.014454435,0.004892244,0.013204865,0.0013020894,0.00015382365,0.00008152647,0.00006161234,0.011463802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893222,0.007968637,0.00027502375,0.00060510135,0.0012566632,0.0005725028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99167764,0.0061594653,0.00061281014,0.00058798835,0.0006656274,0.00029641137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075318054,0.000548203,0.00045161363,0.0028361008,0.004336103,0.008364614,0.002392663,0.005666659,0.0031753501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011209202,0.00026804776,0.0005794841,0.0021905683,0.06997913,0.013143235,0.0037698292,0.007513749,0.0004664835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003066768,0.0000037711532,0.00018519945,0.00002577059,9.472495e-7,0.000066552566,0.011014852,0.00007786966,0.000014897062,0.9850139,0.0012746198,0.0023185736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061316446,0.000016052802,0.0008367468,0.00071100076,0.0000070019505,0.00035144464,0.018051704,0.0006983601,0.00012244663,0.849771,0.12940642,0.000021696917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018329496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0098852115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018329496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009910258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077752857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0719043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153630738","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v28i2.4813","title":"The Art of Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law and economics; Criminology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.03192623384338009,"score_gpt":0.3171683043542877,"score_spread":0.2852420705109076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153630738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065569584,0.03660575,0.0019854873,0.17743811,0.0039032244,0.000024863326,0.000069558635,0.00003885377,0.7733771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68239486,0.012099561,0.0014967198,0.04023778,0.0061788876,0.00013232352,0.00005096304,0.00017783014,0.257231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959518,0.0022535927,0.00010411496,0.00043550896,0.0006266385,0.00062831823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752885,0.0011621756,0.00016503186,0.00039825492,0.00037212003,0.00037354013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036610847,0.0005706341,0.0005758036,0.0011652263,0.013990997,0.0121697225,0.00092450884,0.0069894837,0.010492814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00835451,0.0003992072,0.0003914075,0.0009380821,0.042524833,0.009585159,0.0042283395,0.010814908,0.0014044718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053876784,0.000008788473,0.00010208375,0.000013407263,0.000001895265,0.000023109957,0.0035075804,0.000027661636,0.00002092156,0.9623836,0.03015832,0.0037472195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076076,0.0000134996735,0.00046118913,0.00022376928,0.0000046899195,0.00007265522,0.0064764023,0.000095442934,0.000072544164,0.47209918,0.52045965,0.000013421483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015637584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028937787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015637584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005332061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007969244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03868705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3153894299","doi":"","title":"Seeing Justice Done: Increasing Indigenous Representation on Canadian Juries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Appeal: Review of Current Law and Law Reform","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Jury; Law; Duty; Supreme court; Jury selection; Economic Justice; Political science; Representation (politics); Subject (documents); Criminal justice; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03169880517529474,"score_gpt":0.3514218947023078,"score_spread":0.31972308952701306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153894299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5218254,0.0559763,0.002525815,0.16496669,0.0024418654,0.0003983804,0.0007989304,0.00010015448,0.25096652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9299711,0.033231135,0.0018210872,0.015842704,0.00046783398,0.0001160077,0.0002649357,0.000026368029,0.0182588],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945056,0.001113092,0.00014304333,0.00037040026,0.002521162,0.0013466666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99225813,0.0016187988,0.00045224524,0.0001968003,0.0042145834,0.0012594336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008928755,0.0002136554,0.00036416764,0.0035539728,0.013708174,0.0049069095,0.0025659695,0.0017414131,0.0059970114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0234788,0.00021006608,0.0003056606,0.0028477341,0.0059988964,0.0015254093,0.003985884,0.0021615482,0.00042450585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019778348,0.00016461583,0.05482224,0.001558671,0.00010408799,0.0010388821,0.10484609,0.00041278207,0.002234329,0.058534376,0.1431435,0.63294256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080734724,0.00019322902,0.31421787,0.0039919373,0.00022894642,0.0004900226,0.12963273,0.00056578603,0.0015172673,0.008282182,0.54055,0.0002492957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96008617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9877101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044074226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044074226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10142358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31978238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154278462","doi":"","title":"Legalizing Gay Sex","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Queer; Transgender; Criminal code; Law; Legislature; Parliament; Political science; Homosexuality; Criminology; Sociology; Gender studies; Criminal law; Politics","score_opus":0.04935156283600369,"score_gpt":0.3429765275818143,"score_spread":0.2936249647458106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154278462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01607088,0.009703168,0.003353613,0.09304942,0.003149384,0.00023960025,0.00053744356,0.000115079056,0.8737814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4356525,0.015921464,0.0067474456,0.19102111,0.0014216779,0.00035849874,0.0010725432,0.00012952385,0.34767526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98908,0.0015718447,0.00044825114,0.0009181128,0.004741708,0.0032401665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99402714,0.0017419773,0.0003126328,0.0005887009,0.0022302486,0.0010993619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007505482,0.00041484312,0.0005134999,0.0013558877,0.016365655,0.007974425,0.0024806089,0.008050423,0.01521972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016315704,0.00052222057,0.00064565166,0.00078463496,0.015784228,0.004111438,0.009454273,0.008931976,0.0026051681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011495908,0.000049398914,0.0025412163,0.00015075569,0.0000065098484,0.00054037705,0.029020274,0.00009589709,0.00045777461,0.81401414,0.10848144,0.044630658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010582798,0.000020731417,0.0029255438,0.0010194853,0.000012624213,0.0002980299,0.011279338,0.00007756771,0.00044662642,0.032959636,0.95092,0.00002988084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7234312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7686507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7234312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018611789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.095377386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55639505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154428700","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Hadley Friedland. The Wetiko Legal Principles","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01121750997464177,"score_gpt":0.2846853801377529,"score_spread":0.27346787016311114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154428700","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018542461,0.48909247,0.00058746693,0.28515017,0.12614581,0.00015846879,0.0017754597,0.00025747783,0.09664722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026563616,0.2765152,0.0005745829,0.13129759,0.06423302,0.00028577007,0.0016588009,0.00024408048,0.5225347],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900264,0.00013856699,0.00006326013,0.00014329031,0.0005886169,0.00006365926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99525744,0.0018453898,0.00031412352,0.00012028071,0.00209639,0.0003662361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012361865,0.0011939609,0.0015848374,0.0042326124,0.0012461471,0.0024846026,0.002444418,0.005654013,0.10963775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00978724,0.00069397467,0.0006671011,0.004684552,0.0014326669,0.0028034106,0.0011781047,0.0048711165,0.07824753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022298843,0.0000016402104,0.000006967694,0.00009575587,0.0000013722807,0.000008478425,0.000004091953,0.0000075392136,0.000005782875,0.00025940107,0.9921502,0.0074564945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073867186,0.000004930207,0.00014773986,0.00061722816,0.0000046696696,0.000078817364,0.000019806945,0.000016989427,0.000020687523,0.00069681567,0.9983777,0.000007386542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012963093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035155367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10963775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031992611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003649732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3667748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154564654","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3096876","title":"Nineteen Eighty Three: A Jurisographic Report on Commonwealth v Tasmania","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of Queensland; University of Melbourne; University of Tasmania","keywords":"Commonwealth; Geography; Archaeology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0235499060924922,"score_gpt":0.3017557753102196,"score_spread":0.2782058692177274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154564654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94937485,0.0007724194,0.00025907657,0.008579066,0.0002529537,0.0002997015,0.0023054325,0.00002810578,0.038128275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90674967,0.0014541458,0.00039458083,0.011472509,0.00010405039,0.00024931057,0.0015469133,0.00005005202,0.07797877],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739385,0.00023043537,0.00011698049,0.0001475273,0.00080280256,0.0013083357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566346,0.0006429028,0.0007390104,0.00017255309,0.0016694008,0.0011127067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015038871,0.00026675928,0.00038173687,0.0022412369,0.00995512,0.0019590007,0.0015144186,0.0015284386,0.007550159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066470825,0.00050413044,0.0003080149,0.004269473,0.0023468616,0.0016437796,0.004867531,0.0039025077,0.0009224258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000346029,0.00061092485,0.32773003,0.00065878907,0.00009248844,0.014008006,0.38565406,0.00021087566,0.0048442897,0.030547956,0.17668372,0.058612883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028977802,0.00031219,0.5482778,0.0003725656,0.00006543483,0.0009158482,0.28421727,0.00012395946,0.0014216312,0.0009941314,0.16318072,0.00008955053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60761756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84286433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60761756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010068571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030456688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7893865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155504115","doi":"10.1177/09646639211007890","title":"Book Review: A Jurisprudence of the Body","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.02380261088830227,"score_gpt":0.36349922165052484,"score_spread":0.3396966107622226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155504115","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024141115,0.68350273,0.00086298527,0.17478456,0.09355602,0.000051507446,0.00020617426,0.00006618331,0.0467284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006783219,0.5407446,0.0012734247,0.1627494,0.10742843,0.00019517039,0.00034877498,0.0002737352,0.18020324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964244,0.0011247197,0.0002457482,0.00032206526,0.001688158,0.0001949271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98683435,0.007823923,0.0006387551,0.00050501694,0.0035218382,0.0006762094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003614069,0.00070368336,0.0017623092,0.0051944763,0.0016465364,0.007987916,0.0017586648,0.006953472,0.017477455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01711105,0.00068676216,0.00066432165,0.0059149372,0.004462809,0.00527497,0.002076461,0.0073674084,0.011435129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061681026,0.0000067976202,0.000022651475,0.00038061637,0.0000068825902,0.00002116,0.000049923747,0.00002695062,0.000047780846,0.007887461,0.9725937,0.018949825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004394868,0.000005465382,0.00007265311,0.0008068308,0.0000075308208,0.000059894683,0.000032770535,0.000014198338,0.000021295906,0.0024545086,0.9965161,0.0000042728097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006915523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018671751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017477455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004745916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011324988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058467925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157028416","doi":"","title":"2020.04.015. ХОРВИТЦ П. КОКСФОРДСКАЯ ЛЕКЦИЯ: ЧЕСТЬ, КЛЯТВЫ И ВЕРХОВЕНСТВО ПРАВА. HORWITZ P. THE COXFORD LECTURE: HONOUR, OATHS AND THE RULE OF LAW // CANADIAN JOURNAL OF LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE. - CAMBRIDGE, 2019. - VOL. 32, N 2. - P. 389-411","year":2020,"lang":"ru","type":"article","venue":"Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Сер. 4, Государство и право: Реферативный журнал","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010692407355968596,"score_gpt":0.2393686657706407,"score_spread":0.2286762584146721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157028416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002782829,0.0028680419,0.00046186318,0.006219104,0.003049687,0.00009285713,0.014789542,0.0012455028,0.97099507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014724198,0.0010217398,0.0003084603,0.0009506444,0.00033629133,0.00009007414,0.0042577833,0.0003714535,0.9911911],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957865,0.000033154658,0.000030469142,0.000060328966,0.00018299662,0.0001143652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884677,0.000092719594,0.00008282632,0.000068291556,0.00049846736,0.00041089003],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007041546,0.000884809,0.00057567545,0.001690248,0.0014850349,0.004481102,0.0012222176,0.003836352,0.8803527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018636165,0.0005674347,0.00062136794,0.001992211,0.0007022373,0.0026457692,0.0019957733,0.0021691415,0.82516706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032665317,0.000023433806,0.00015416979,0.0001675677,0.0000022058564,0.00003280646,0.000038111655,0.000032626307,0.00014489915,0.0063906997,0.8960569,0.09692394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010625338,0.000013889742,0.0010092512,0.00018561882,0.0000020048333,0.000061023493,0.000046346588,0.000034310495,0.00006180815,0.0015427058,0.99702483,0.000007644886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016251376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023518382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021355564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040060137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1706624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157395698","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v25i1.5026","title":"Fantasies of Rehabilitation and Imprisonment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Rehabilitation; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.011921391748082542,"score_gpt":0.29536000284593195,"score_spread":0.2834386110978494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157395698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5623498,0.0057692565,0.001856842,0.18272649,0.0014629924,0.00006940754,0.00010471795,0.000047243084,0.24561323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880655,0.00048371125,0.00016116598,0.0027544275,0.00008534039,0.000019409494,0.000013227228,0.0000140723505,0.008402965],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932168,0.0051132995,0.00014108836,0.00018305056,0.00048494665,0.0008606967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926521,0.0029819743,0.0010357954,0.0003389714,0.0008326808,0.002158534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005475243,0.0005543982,0.00037557195,0.0014797794,0.020337397,0.009356779,0.0013990426,0.004820851,0.005505221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015806979,0.0004481071,0.00041528785,0.00060892093,0.031460244,0.0066353967,0.006519225,0.009457002,0.00050656905],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007423281,0.00013640165,0.006826691,0.000053212785,0.000019395855,0.0013326154,0.8074182,0.00008553896,0.00025077362,0.16356239,0.012228282,0.008012237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017862718,0.000057996545,0.005477475,0.0001380488,0.000010512454,0.0016896584,0.9042694,0.00019701991,0.0001321559,0.029909253,0.058046725,0.00005392372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011286658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015429608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020337397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003989708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037364226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028956175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157436409","doi":"","title":"A Colonial Castle: Defence of Property in R v Stanley","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Jury; Law; Accident (philosophy); Property (philosophy); Criminology; Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028988163395373273,"score_gpt":0.28052884301434555,"score_spread":0.2515406796189723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157436409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39809704,0.0052637607,0.0014951113,0.12717803,0.0029334284,0.0001501197,0.000057192363,0.000089151035,0.46473622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82010686,0.0011646572,0.0005733365,0.066016726,0.00035155966,0.00006181275,0.000017457116,0.000047968973,0.11165957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580055,0.0013131736,0.00012074883,0.00056751416,0.00048908225,0.0017090031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775714,0.0008826353,0.00019129975,0.0001521904,0.00027750013,0.0007392995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042953417,0.0003961116,0.00062591734,0.0005508418,0.030427646,0.0063417875,0.0018167029,0.007243163,0.0058555678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009513028,0.0004853892,0.00037228988,0.0005173849,0.014982942,0.0027581549,0.010119745,0.02012357,0.0008105603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015180485,0.0001112982,0.005382486,0.00013665936,0.00003447259,0.012121935,0.13373634,0.00038130884,0.0016737789,0.7144298,0.103068486,0.028771598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009045801,0.00029052154,0.008297949,0.0005670365,0.00005408572,0.00240309,0.091377944,0.0005494512,0.0025925173,0.08325063,0.81031555,0.00021073055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18781719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42249238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18781719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008049246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014026782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37344795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157673981","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3588","title":"Embodying Punishment: Emotions, Identities, and Lived Experiences in Women’s Prisons, by Anastasia Chamberlen","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Dialectic; Schema (genetic algorithms); Relation (database); Meaning (existential); Sociology; Punishment (psychology); Space (punctuation); Construct (python library); Law; Order (exchange); Social psychology; Epistemology; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017442813668413423,"score_gpt":0.27482477107710057,"score_spread":0.25738195740868713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157673981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89764017,0.014680959,0.00057549006,0.06423455,0.0012416936,0.000052635736,0.00006985029,0.000050987805,0.021453576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98574036,0.0037961127,0.00018781281,0.003051691,0.00017361382,0.000050056362,0.000016356855,0.000036372527,0.006947776],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673235,0.0022722988,0.00007951212,0.00018959965,0.00036495263,0.00036143634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714595,0.0013121255,0.0005870212,0.00008443552,0.00023415267,0.00063632114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028693774,0.0007016115,0.0008255105,0.00082946074,0.012321178,0.009312169,0.0013354695,0.0029853089,0.0025823715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010592654,0.00067377713,0.00031395868,0.00074277574,0.017639298,0.005537514,0.0070934184,0.006116911,0.000551315],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022641481,0.000025666683,0.0007700967,0.000037797767,0.000005493554,0.00052156294,0.9913095,0.000013022185,0.0003466288,0.0017396337,0.0030595602,0.002148425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039696706,0.00004818114,0.002408807,0.00014987706,0.000004008241,0.00057706865,0.97803134,0.000033657514,0.00008877805,0.0006134691,0.018017115,0.000023718268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017969264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025896417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017969264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032253219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021596642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03572929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157946555","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3590","title":"The Wetiko Legal Principles: Cree and Anishinabek Responses to Violence and Victimization by Hadley Louise Friedland","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Monster; Interpersonal violence; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Psychology; History; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Ecology","score_opus":0.013274055819828998,"score_gpt":0.269052910257698,"score_spread":0.255778854437869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157946555","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10692586,0.024015214,0.0013182391,0.575702,0.0023511495,0.00003903516,0.000052077878,0.000037876736,0.28955856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78678787,0.01685256,0.001139134,0.070110716,0.0006428912,0.00006211882,0.00003264553,0.00006187629,0.12431022],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983285,0.0008075997,0.000027545162,0.000112754686,0.00046428374,0.00025939403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982509,0.0011003328,0.00015924427,0.00006062734,0.00022166071,0.0002072161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019798384,0.00024958947,0.00019926138,0.00080773135,0.011238307,0.0054153814,0.0009787453,0.003041371,0.0024122063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00513945,0.00026421619,0.00015251407,0.0007026715,0.021671977,0.005135921,0.0033022042,0.007143452,0.00029407963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015057169,0.000056860503,0.0017275655,0.00009392602,0.0000079978545,0.0010813412,0.41598377,0.0001229972,0.00036006208,0.34213173,0.21471325,0.02370545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055266273,0.000015266349,0.0030241255,0.00043972494,0.000005259983,0.0006115803,0.34087017,0.00009534409,0.0002323093,0.02816912,0.62650144,0.000030127907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06978409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13396299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9302159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056726076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040925257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13875586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159974740","doi":"10.11606/d.2.2020.tde-04052021-214818","title":"Direito e narratividade: a semiótica de Bernard Jackson","year":2020,"lang":"pt","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Narrativity; Narrative; Normative; Intelligibility (philosophy); Legal norm; Semiotics; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Sociology; Epistemology; Norm (philosophy); Comprehension; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.023864082000234568,"score_gpt":0.32383422626601716,"score_spread":0.2999701442657826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159974740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079242975,0.05446266,0.03971321,0.1334559,0.002906983,0.00015090076,0.0001795763,0.00013617906,0.6897517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8439559,0.021335166,0.01033283,0.0048669577,0.0010795371,0.00029080478,0.000076470205,0.00021678636,0.117845565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975134,0.0019214721,0.000047749963,0.00016432087,0.00025416384,0.00009883903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820673,0.0011656318,0.00013874951,0.00007535749,0.00023615349,0.00017736637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022188397,0.00059099396,0.00035145952,0.0009822395,0.0054832986,0.0062353644,0.00077589735,0.0023681226,0.0033918815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041417135,0.0002951771,0.00021857109,0.0012522707,0.01648966,0.0081453165,0.0033246516,0.0031517178,0.00074679893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034617664,0.000014695384,0.00017757973,0.0001315687,0.0000022624479,0.0004207156,0.13569221,0.00013835331,0.00059019116,0.8431664,0.012367872,0.0072634965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013668633,0.0000431487,0.00047859765,0.00045073987,0.000006789677,0.0006420029,0.06825492,0.0004859143,0.00054298824,0.20970064,0.71934026,0.000040303323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064337268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005072203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064337268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035825283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017167225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025993168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160275598","doi":"10.1177/17416590211015747","title":"Book review: Rafe McGregor, <i>A Criminology of Narrative Fiction</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crime Media Culture An International Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Narrative review; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Criminology; Sociology; Art; Literature; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.03957482398319874,"score_gpt":0.3507973597470168,"score_spread":0.3112225357638181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160275598","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008560145,0.74731743,0.00031577054,0.13498943,0.09186891,0.000060866827,0.000416838,0.000085387175,0.024859814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001607555,0.57577664,0.0005754496,0.14203551,0.07897601,0.00018289067,0.0006992621,0.0001569203,0.19998974],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859756,0.00019905328,0.000089401416,0.00018547507,0.0008456453,0.000082858984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935208,0.002504524,0.0004348325,0.0001481898,0.002897261,0.00049456226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016362758,0.0012829126,0.0018414923,0.0055257,0.0014994636,0.0048021236,0.0031841495,0.0059012733,0.036210287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009815303,0.00067696517,0.0007350704,0.006000282,0.0018299243,0.004197619,0.0019746847,0.005363039,0.03085706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002759135,0.0000024109227,0.000009454153,0.00022522798,0.0000028470045,0.000008904933,0.000015474976,0.000009389503,0.000010516578,0.00025533483,0.9883913,0.011066526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004403125,0.0000034957377,0.00007458979,0.0005717263,0.0000063640296,0.00006184972,0.000030502657,0.000008101846,0.000015345058,0.0002773655,0.99894077,0.0000056371314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021567801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061719548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036210287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039487025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062746364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12113553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161066285","doi":"10.4337/9781788977203.00007","title":"Foreword: What is legal geography? Why, and why now?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Indigenous; Colonialism; Political science; Scholarship; Law and development; Geography; Law; Sociology; Comparative law; Legal realism; Development studies; Ecology","score_opus":0.017336249573840435,"score_gpt":0.2456196691819173,"score_spread":0.22828341960807685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161066285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019313529,0.25978914,0.0044581136,0.11474855,0.016894355,0.00007627773,0.00028587828,0.00027877616,0.6015376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04715951,0.1467482,0.0047272914,0.032150332,0.009056777,0.0001208373,0.00052233855,0.0005509941,0.75896364],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996362,0.0001383661,0.000017669814,0.0000451863,0.0001304434,0.00003217082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931514,0.00035141452,0.000034076325,0.00004079301,0.0001797575,0.000078785284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041363656,0.00045211456,0.000547515,0.0011826825,0.0019080442,0.005763279,0.0005537407,0.0015875743,0.025242085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017186628,0.00025598763,0.00024415902,0.002078083,0.003570348,0.006022217,0.0014456959,0.002995569,0.012447402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009302073,0.00001538698,0.0002466048,0.0004140878,0.000004392974,0.000092731934,0.0037315986,0.000150614,0.00020552888,0.1727013,0.72898614,0.09344239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.3232925e-7,0.0000035300575,0.00019750097,0.00038781026,0.000001623454,0.00007309732,0.0013618472,0.000025605621,0.000026411504,0.01199676,0.9859218,0.0000031703341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006672378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01201066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025242085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002167664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00222199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08444321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162018101","doi":"","title":"Courts Without Cases: The Law and Politics of Advisory Opinions by Carissima Mathen","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Political science; Advisory committee; Public administration","score_opus":0.014100189838632399,"score_gpt":0.2821387540531316,"score_spread":0.26803856421449923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162018101","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014074998,0.2832162,0.0016601554,0.57236737,0.010144118,0.000030108124,0.00006444498,0.000053190157,0.13105689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.121124335,0.2897813,0.0019682357,0.32573694,0.027574085,0.00020165805,0.00011008465,0.00019131057,0.23331194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98971975,0.0044869143,0.00024187008,0.0010083275,0.0038773187,0.00066589774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97228605,0.021115173,0.001039062,0.00065746537,0.0042722337,0.0006299358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072955503,0.00050513964,0.000657721,0.0025631557,0.0068150377,0.010323299,0.002024308,0.008826468,0.006835421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038191356,0.00068625057,0.0004432026,0.0035089317,0.009674688,0.011444339,0.0021318041,0.012360659,0.0024588045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012680775,0.000011624998,0.000121340025,0.00010475058,0.000007003691,0.000047578746,0.00086553965,0.00015562102,0.00004409981,0.360677,0.61503875,0.022914022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008324307,0.000008359024,0.0003787009,0.0006007077,0.000009434133,0.00005020487,0.00042068626,0.00020758402,0.00008235635,0.06934891,0.9288586,0.000026248172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06155581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063231766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06155581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011134234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013566086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12239504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163599923","doi":"10.7202/1076908ar","title":"Going Circular: Indigenous Legal Research Methodology as Legal Practice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Wonder; Subject (documents); Work (physics); Sociology; Legal research; Political science; Traditional knowledge; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Law; Epistemology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.16709179580478842,"score_gpt":0.4591151140518464,"score_spread":0.29202331824705796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163599923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022255525,0.017464597,0.2669464,0.3920742,0.006577833,0.0015709947,0.00018862214,0.00036379078,0.29255807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68402845,0.009857596,0.1936634,0.049043734,0.0040061884,0.0050229602,0.00017388543,0.0004691004,0.05373463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.79543316,0.1820285,0.003407415,0.006137867,0.010437234,0.002555833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8021397,0.15311576,0.0063953823,0.019583816,0.015559798,0.0032054414],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17752612,0.00062318606,0.0013108379,0.004923749,0.020071823,0.026111104,0.0049122814,0.010479182,0.008614408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14781639,0.0008292039,0.0011908936,0.0051915273,0.12628825,0.031155463,0.014289454,0.014759271,0.0015345928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007928863,0.000018248902,0.00017074004,0.00015288407,0.0000057249817,0.000074529715,0.06455542,0.000063282896,0.0000612377,0.92410994,0.003236778,0.0075432635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023428971,0.00005795955,0.00042538004,0.0018298726,0.000023040588,0.00019396062,0.056507025,0.0007888436,0.0003740229,0.7663859,0.173347,0.00004364611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014549636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013062226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8224739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014781414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033149205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93885905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163756057","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a7588","title":"Did I Break It? Recording Indigenous (Customary) Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Limiting; Work (physics); Political science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.008005651693130172,"score_gpt":0.2614457549019123,"score_spread":0.25344010320878213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163756057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51078075,0.0059623416,0.009149466,0.08338001,0.0014978978,0.00013413226,0.00015528915,0.00020245711,0.3887377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97002,0.0012223757,0.0012035742,0.0025785202,0.00014042735,0.000028912238,0.000030551568,0.00007535095,0.024700264],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917761,0.0031579726,0.0003106341,0.00074048206,0.002628381,0.0013865244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912453,0.0045783794,0.0008201078,0.0010339605,0.0017629657,0.0005592993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008656499,0.0003004198,0.00043675175,0.0015826193,0.017151097,0.010767686,0.00227999,0.0030355758,0.0037320126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023083951,0.00033815557,0.00023196316,0.002154071,0.043531127,0.007695319,0.0046777846,0.009914311,0.00048719282],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013724837,0.000011961088,0.001569826,0.0000738605,0.000008210229,0.0005236567,0.79292697,0.000043167827,0.0004930671,0.18400753,0.005985628,0.014342503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054282937,0.00003076705,0.0044113733,0.0005995515,0.000021256461,0.000557824,0.71098226,0.00016360536,0.0012121921,0.015152225,0.2668054,0.00005814173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24346974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25007927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24346974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0162879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0114084715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48410517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164278042","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3748898","title":"Foreword for 'On the Margins of Trans Legal Chang'\", A Special Issue of the Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit Et Société","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014566858152705541,"score_gpt":0.24372086719932198,"score_spread":0.22915400904661645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164278042","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022707555,0.016914193,0.00039253326,0.32053733,0.5740954,0.00012617654,0.0011622821,0.00021565193,0.086329244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035546587,0.010821176,0.00051947666,0.12264833,0.18322748,0.00018040893,0.0008000901,0.00043928158,0.6778091],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986291,0.00016936973,0.000102517515,0.0001606069,0.0007623663,0.0001761321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932024,0.0024697816,0.0003225078,0.00030610058,0.0028814168,0.0008177954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015779871,0.0010121102,0.0014445281,0.0018890972,0.0058126035,0.008751901,0.0019673,0.010571381,0.13235644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0105235195,0.0004812344,0.0008357729,0.0016194052,0.001733679,0.0063054133,0.0023975782,0.009638434,0.04721484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001924422,0.0000023523057,0.000009770746,0.000018366667,5.2098795e-7,0.000005709132,0.000022076181,0.0000017604301,0.000011476982,0.00096336287,0.9973532,0.0016094696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004498403,0.000005592404,0.00043191324,0.00014524757,0.000004301873,0.000015964279,0.00020422821,0.00001929892,0.000028306362,0.0011974552,0.9979352,0.000007918576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049160566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.121941224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95083946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042462074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068342006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44277638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164537606","doi":"10.1017/s1744552321000161","title":"Myth and concealment at colonial law's foundations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Colonialism; Negation; Racism; Law; Sociology; Work (physics); Epistemology; Political science; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03274311785472162,"score_gpt":0.3593945095243192,"score_spread":0.32665139166959756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164537606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20576845,0.018020362,0.022177186,0.23613958,0.001423202,0.000045167497,0.0000875507,0.00009551742,0.516243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914607,0.0009348905,0.0008253504,0.0022378422,0.00024128325,0.000017485569,0.000006819269,0.000022111084,0.0042536077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939126,0.0035875528,0.00015316725,0.0007934093,0.00085466175,0.0006986618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915193,0.005630223,0.0006804571,0.0010136215,0.00070400385,0.00045245854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076749376,0.00028788752,0.0005460919,0.0019295877,0.009488796,0.012293599,0.0014394115,0.004434247,0.0031599833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013387174,0.00039116913,0.00032548953,0.001044882,0.09721753,0.011395642,0.006551261,0.0081115505,0.00025253682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051498164,0.000004481784,0.000108878805,0.000011163499,0.0000017423589,0.000056394183,0.018516812,0.000052787153,0.00003920777,0.9789908,0.00093740557,0.0012752459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011399163,0.000015212201,0.0004788522,0.00024853664,0.0000069034973,0.00020193496,0.014292246,0.00041490354,0.00023079848,0.90094143,0.08313682,0.000020885065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0101738395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068996744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012293599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007803042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056615293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164612247","doi":"10.1017/s1537592721000876","title":"Just Property, Volume Three: Property in an Age of Ideologies. By Christopher Pierson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. 344p. $85.00 cloth.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Ideology; Content (measure theory); Volume (thermodynamics); Media studies; Economic history; Gerontology; Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Law; Medicine; Politics; Physics; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.027359632239261033,"score_gpt":0.275448121176771,"score_spread":0.24808848893750995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164612247","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004960446,0.8207026,0.0005924423,0.11246504,0.0077179554,0.000010591492,0.00019246023,0.000061928906,0.057760984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026121968,0.6712748,0.0012983466,0.015963456,0.008301227,0.000080676655,0.00044451197,0.00022913527,0.2762859],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925,0.00022667844,0.0000511389,0.00009349853,0.00027179165,0.00010687219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988675,0.0005191008,0.00013162813,0.000067922745,0.00020965221,0.00020424656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013302921,0.0012611834,0.00070855266,0.0018039941,0.0023088502,0.006700508,0.001014066,0.0034315358,0.027861336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027672497,0.00086550997,0.00055135106,0.002977809,0.00543574,0.01196626,0.0026413163,0.004342609,0.009930561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014022255,0.000007893334,0.00013990459,0.0002782611,0.0000047711687,0.00005078866,0.00094995444,0.00004390239,0.00004739824,0.029436192,0.9270697,0.04195718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029970713,0.0000036449194,0.00047292112,0.0006313239,0.0000030938425,0.000121408535,0.0010416725,0.000026185644,0.000027121416,0.017473163,0.98019034,0.000006193503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012531424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024425551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027861336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003756074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041984324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09320545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164813521","doi":"10.1017/s1744552321000197","title":"Improvising with Peter","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Scholarship; Kindness; Improvisation; Active listening; Relation (database); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Art; Psychology; Law; Visual arts; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.021045785279795726,"score_gpt":0.3231918301694952,"score_spread":0.3021460448896995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164813521","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33221713,0.0021786147,0.025482353,0.07194836,0.0032817323,0.0002453685,0.00016555237,0.00058733387,0.56389356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8670399,0.0006073669,0.0040978077,0.0034425643,0.00036488354,0.00008068545,0.000044251636,0.00017750268,0.12414508],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843866,0.00073332275,0.00003204357,0.00020970353,0.0003763578,0.00020992223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974618,0.0014661351,0.0001930593,0.00020316067,0.0002287279,0.00044705006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011198849,0.00045057968,0.00020917009,0.0006137333,0.007073297,0.004153833,0.0006404366,0.0018163051,0.022458645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007499532,0.00016761551,0.00018623626,0.00033242418,0.0073062317,0.0032931124,0.004104269,0.004825724,0.0036892372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022009073,0.0001217431,0.0019094445,0.00033496518,0.000014257399,0.00396792,0.5941723,0.00028545488,0.009941307,0.20411003,0.08568164,0.099240914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012768094,0.00015199007,0.0013860615,0.00044857347,0.00001185187,0.0029856798,0.26342186,0.0005924537,0.0064502615,0.019270444,0.7052252,0.000042878335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016675569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030401251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022458645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001323306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012216228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075131655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3165823557","doi":"10.4324/9780429293306","title":"Routledge Handbook of Law and Society","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02018765659921506,"score_gpt":0.2781224118546504,"score_spread":0.25793475525543536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3165823557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034898205,0.2403166,0.006754669,0.018005654,0.0029053036,0.000119693344,0.0027011759,0.0007651595,0.7280827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012403896,0.24648827,0.010029058,0.0046032253,0.0013090209,0.00060335186,0.0032171202,0.0010086796,0.72033733],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848396,0.00033856573,0.00017425179,0.00022613429,0.00067581,0.000101296064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972398,0.0014270359,0.00022810613,0.00037872666,0.0005609454,0.00016527255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011521055,0.0018131171,0.0015359253,0.004036172,0.0022845415,0.0075601246,0.0021738613,0.0036783111,0.1155482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047355327,0.0010848551,0.0005959288,0.00992474,0.0038533425,0.01139806,0.0029669588,0.005017773,0.05749492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011227774,0.000023204948,0.00016283314,0.0009798134,0.0000087236085,0.00013026278,0.0016053607,0.00032465844,0.00013768952,0.19562623,0.5825463,0.2184438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013272717,0.0000018693146,0.00009114154,0.0005961956,0.0000011566804,0.00004686618,0.0002761193,0.000028566821,0.000014619462,0.017262403,0.9816762,0.0000035374476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017427333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024394304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1155482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050461637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009909229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3865472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168669791","doi":"","title":"Le testament artistique ou de l’art de tirer sa révérence","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.014639068218688673,"score_gpt":0.2623003701090523,"score_spread":0.24766130189036364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168669791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011339194,0.0062689455,0.016553853,0.033964463,0.002268455,0.00003693281,0.000044446017,0.00020449124,0.92931926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5710273,0.0050464873,0.008670243,0.007918456,0.0021860816,0.00012504775,0.0000728485,0.0006617562,0.40429184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99354047,0.003701347,0.00016281391,0.0007936683,0.0012614913,0.0005401797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959543,0.0018051364,0.00033427496,0.0010289866,0.00048714425,0.0003902936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005174764,0.0011086351,0.0005665586,0.0015521122,0.008270343,0.016096726,0.0017807515,0.0035673485,0.020542463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008695866,0.00034359697,0.0006246989,0.000937316,0.035648383,0.010027042,0.0061096996,0.0071310513,0.0057623307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016179429,0.000008713575,0.00015100781,0.00006141531,0.0000046436776,0.00008271864,0.012667429,0.00009815889,0.00021046633,0.96959454,0.007678386,0.009426314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012273866,0.00003188612,0.0004116984,0.00031071898,0.000009350965,0.0003079069,0.010758581,0.00031451028,0.0006063339,0.21113573,0.77607346,0.000027566284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040575066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067097466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020542463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00473396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039212755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06872141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168699468","doi":"10.3366/legal.2021.0007","title":"First Nations Cultural Loss: Whiteness and the<i>Timber Creek</i>Judgment","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legalities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Law; Doctrine; Obligation; Political science; Damages; White (mutation); High Court; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.019703903309302183,"score_gpt":0.2782887064877742,"score_spread":0.25858480317847204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168699468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17235519,0.0053612017,0.0016933844,0.23430474,0.003036515,0.00008687454,0.000037925507,0.000028945466,0.58309525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7805253,0.0012796028,0.00061056507,0.10544553,0.0006892326,0.0000611972,0.000016300657,0.00003488568,0.11133737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99632996,0.0010285318,0.00012357651,0.00037167387,0.0012250852,0.0009211429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975319,0.0011120829,0.00017329057,0.000108604945,0.0005323714,0.00054180605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003975637,0.00027718188,0.00030784108,0.00050827593,0.017216198,0.008601756,0.0013604487,0.0072208005,0.0024713262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069402615,0.00025461553,0.00028146245,0.0004385315,0.015478217,0.0026047286,0.0041049654,0.010412647,0.00032192908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029357185,0.00005581778,0.0035590695,0.00006794854,0.0000152211005,0.0041667377,0.09548647,0.00014255855,0.001195338,0.7699103,0.10990855,0.015462768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000233917,0.00009239288,0.008527711,0.00066010293,0.000042241285,0.0018296068,0.10364337,0.000629276,0.0019200613,0.0977465,0.78476727,0.00011801766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09432529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21711297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09432529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00523405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0120812375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18755251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169724136","doi":"","title":"'That is Not How the Common Law Works': Paths to Tort Liability for Harassment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Tort; Law; Harassment; Liability; Statute; Political science; Warrant; Strict liability; Common law; Vicarious liability; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.029804356088192034,"score_gpt":0.29769391851803834,"score_spread":0.2678895624298463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169724136","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03678246,0.005193502,0.028834013,0.52363807,0.0006760883,0.00013903496,0.000097029755,0.000089202695,0.40455067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9468,0.0034320147,0.010160315,0.024800126,0.0002697192,0.00017845636,0.00004785964,0.00006871889,0.014242805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98494834,0.007339263,0.00043062182,0.0016520108,0.0026042028,0.003025586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98402274,0.009224703,0.001410523,0.001429896,0.002618664,0.0012934788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015476299,0.0006504646,0.0006607786,0.0029758955,0.013923123,0.018154662,0.0033995043,0.017481746,0.009456823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037585482,0.00067491503,0.0017159595,0.0019418261,0.08228813,0.032273207,0.0133505445,0.01454058,0.0014357317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032904152,0.000010111191,0.00019149053,0.000009753428,0.0000027684036,0.00007808179,0.0018971091,0.00010080233,0.000014024591,0.9944647,0.0015710947,0.0016567345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000142040135,0.000014192097,0.0003653327,0.000113289265,0.000008389379,0.00011714736,0.0037537168,0.00028199458,0.00007766581,0.97303176,0.022200964,0.000021311405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031933293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02447499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031933293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015421409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02245601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11189067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3171202283","doi":"10.22215/etd/2016-11389","title":"Architecture &amp; National Identity: The Judicial Precinct a Century in the Making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Precinct; Architecture; Identity (music); National identity; Democracy; Political science; Place identity; Function (biology); Public administration; Law; Geography; Engineering; Politics; Aesthetics; Civil engineering; Urban planning; Art","score_opus":0.025501263551474855,"score_gpt":0.36165547679746485,"score_spread":0.33615421324599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3171202283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12281318,0.0053529227,0.0012026425,0.039011165,0.00044841808,0.00002409409,0.00011471398,0.000021542919,0.8310113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95238584,0.0018576056,0.00042421097,0.0015669686,0.000036620484,0.0000063265384,0.000026387188,0.000014890021,0.043681018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981085,0.00037432293,0.00002487907,0.00015027628,0.00063825253,0.0007037469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879265,0.00023946994,0.000094947645,0.000054018285,0.0004494581,0.00036947377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014972057,0.00021263499,0.00017300752,0.0011944302,0.022718921,0.01254378,0.0006369599,0.0015906753,0.005102674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026955034,0.00014051012,0.00018067648,0.0020962798,0.029340185,0.00344066,0.0029628456,0.0026319267,0.00031089582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014657566,0.000011131073,0.002321546,0.00003044394,0.0000027918325,0.00016223062,0.074169375,0.00012960182,0.00015762952,0.885414,0.019240081,0.018346643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071651525,0.000015720498,0.019072749,0.0002958841,0.000011262782,0.00018888927,0.25353846,0.00026086776,0.00038006075,0.087398864,0.63878524,0.000044771656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9352566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9742933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9352566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0617969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07928426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44837004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172842702","doi":"10.7202/1076696ar","title":"Enjeux et perspectives de la reconnaissance faciale en sciences criminelles","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.37981344078823837,"score_gpt":0.4731470215099149,"score_spread":0.09333358072167652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172842702","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13906403,0.05974975,0.371148,0.055681586,0.001727482,0.00045425817,0.00053966464,0.0008263868,0.3708089],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6764313,0.052977644,0.18477257,0.0054905163,0.0007426646,0.00064832077,0.00037652437,0.00051643106,0.07804402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929884,0.0033745568,0.00022444487,0.000922027,0.0021816127,0.00030899927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877537,0.007540297,0.0008832891,0.0014282024,0.0019936746,0.00040080238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010322272,0.0011314733,0.0006655301,0.004115208,0.0040142452,0.011815625,0.00194792,0.0034864282,0.012509693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014344741,0.000513883,0.00094386557,0.0022922624,0.012520613,0.009030839,0.0054389476,0.0032620202,0.002066243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016944233,0.00008046565,0.0072828513,0.0019104951,0.00008426272,0.0010284223,0.056537185,0.0036934174,0.011587683,0.52777517,0.008591602,0.38125905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020453492,0.00027228767,0.014075291,0.0033724036,0.00012855207,0.0029533217,0.05517321,0.005430361,0.016031548,0.29562455,0.6067069,0.00021114804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00798595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011661394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012509693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058351317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00444214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054590046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173188422","doi":"10.1177/17438721211026560","title":"Contemplating Law, Film and Mennonites","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Contemplation; German; Patriarchy; Action (physics); Sociology; Art; Order (exchange); Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy; Art history; Theology; Gender studies; Political science","score_opus":0.029444492640957567,"score_gpt":0.26305244411162826,"score_spread":0.2336079514706707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173188422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22775984,0.0075520193,0.0031989738,0.06762661,0.0013323497,0.000057270132,0.000026243013,0.00006061248,0.6923861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96030027,0.001727062,0.00047818897,0.004141553,0.00019203665,0.000024294688,0.0000114746845,0.000039551982,0.033085626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997488,0.0015669154,0.00004222679,0.0002404208,0.00042004898,0.00024245091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981681,0.0009136188,0.0002764894,0.00011486235,0.00017643772,0.00035044085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023516829,0.0002635256,0.00019820046,0.00056318904,0.0097022345,0.008589995,0.0006337811,0.0018197302,0.0034676886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050989087,0.0001784298,0.000110727684,0.00039111453,0.028565142,0.0049928995,0.004358509,0.0039725453,0.00020738262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024940202,0.000056263892,0.002024242,0.00007178467,0.00000647876,0.0005628815,0.36510378,0.00005377336,0.0006080622,0.5992278,0.013499195,0.018760655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016033668,0.00005871173,0.004679966,0.00039102221,0.000009298063,0.00045636285,0.31002548,0.00019334827,0.0010607421,0.052204587,0.6308716,0.00003284218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012532427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022006199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012532427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004204479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017386964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030505776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177381297","doi":"","title":"The 1969 Criminal Amendments: Constituting the Terms of Gay Resistance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Homosexuality; Politics; Liminality; Law; Political science; Body politic; Resistance (ecology); Law reform; Criminal law; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.022499392490645156,"score_gpt":0.2572876654546532,"score_spread":0.23478827296400806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177381297","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31550875,0.0048779594,0.0029151957,0.048869297,0.0010800563,0.000057034205,0.00006314044,0.000034307588,0.6265943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771171,0.0008496519,0.00048617276,0.0039381306,0.00026300113,0.000027328328,0.000013655494,0.000023085428,0.017281905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99152875,0.004201887,0.00028525115,0.000669754,0.0017425483,0.0015719135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99630725,0.0019671603,0.00063398684,0.00037422637,0.0004575575,0.00025988973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042900713,0.0002563931,0.00026677936,0.0015040131,0.010629815,0.008770321,0.0007846861,0.0047305822,0.002459819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010606651,0.00039896677,0.00040431204,0.0010686788,0.036326554,0.0039097876,0.005569059,0.008898939,0.00037711463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016546595,0.0000126170835,0.00040387438,0.000009239531,0.0000023864154,0.00022116459,0.024202036,0.000103872,0.0002386955,0.9693245,0.0015455893,0.0039194697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007359513,0.000096888274,0.0073418412,0.00064503134,0.000030358658,0.0005692631,0.046822775,0.0006481,0.0027259965,0.303462,0.63745797,0.00012609128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029562118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023061274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029562118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011165215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063631968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081009686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3178424575","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12671","title":"Boycott, Resistance and the Law: Cause Lawyering in Conflict and Authoritarianism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Boycott; Authoritarianism; Resistance (ecology); Law; Power (physics); Sociology; Legitimacy; Politics; Political science; Democracy","score_opus":0.036929623822674194,"score_gpt":0.31536100757675817,"score_spread":0.278431383754084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3178424575","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09154814,0.6970537,0.002015703,0.08629126,0.00081179925,0.000039756018,0.000027214322,0.000012029294,0.122200504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8906932,0.10022995,0.00031960066,0.0038224298,0.0006618838,0.000026680684,0.00001173691,0.000007208633,0.0042272727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99162865,0.0069084107,0.00013639692,0.00023236372,0.00070450536,0.00038959237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98447543,0.011880952,0.001985582,0.000258666,0.00092525367,0.00047409412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006009628,0.00018426219,0.0006074501,0.0019657875,0.0018509332,0.004596915,0.00077707676,0.0024265214,0.0034056571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012224664,0.0001587556,0.00018404254,0.0019483495,0.012341783,0.0036613874,0.0021364691,0.0023075696,0.00022670679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010504054,0.00020909896,0.006226082,0.002845276,0.00007286236,0.00096885115,0.05353544,0.0005899592,0.00031291632,0.78254354,0.02013748,0.13245343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010646329,0.0004536148,0.032510433,0.007503874,0.00010606411,0.0018482188,0.10623666,0.00066006824,0.00059987686,0.31068328,0.5392253,0.00006612442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006099169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009268692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006099169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003196496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003978308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03178233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179617679","doi":"10.5195/cinej.2021.354","title":"Baudrillard, Hyperreality, and the Evil in Othello and The Hateful Eight","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CINEJ Cinema Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Problematization; Scholarship; Power (physics); Battle; Feud; Aesthetics; Alterity; Art; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Literature; Epistemology; Political science; History","score_opus":0.01189943547732991,"score_gpt":0.2708180043212964,"score_spread":0.25891856884396647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179617679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31583545,0.009690179,0.0024393408,0.0483109,0.0014536639,0.000025066498,0.000025387988,0.000045926965,0.6221741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97618663,0.0008826312,0.00018219589,0.0008506253,0.00016079175,0.000008837501,0.0000034665825,0.000028499331,0.021696353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999368,0.00038769658,0.0000086937225,0.00003930644,0.00008224119,0.00011413247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994815,0.00031593905,0.000058480426,0.00003359427,0.000030095049,0.000080317855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086278253,0.0002870204,0.0001607986,0.00047800533,0.007191452,0.005564925,0.00039546113,0.0017140068,0.0026255983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001860797,0.0002425957,0.000109374996,0.0003109797,0.022916881,0.0031117005,0.0030916533,0.0032328272,0.00020419789],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006595736,0.000029714742,0.0008050481,0.000068391215,0.0000036949555,0.0007048802,0.3296969,0.00009200727,0.00078913453,0.641696,0.015239775,0.010808546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033084623,0.00004552391,0.005006031,0.0005583446,0.000010096757,0.00080161594,0.23913093,0.0003302594,0.000943617,0.09975148,0.65335,0.000039105384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010275666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02482689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010275666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026496311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008106905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020431697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181155354","doi":"10.1017/9781108773522.012","title":"“The Same Stuff”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Wright; White (mutation); Appropriation; Rhetoric; History; Art; Trope (literature); Art history; Literature; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.025816528145827793,"score_gpt":0.22704422205532626,"score_spread":0.20122769390949846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181155354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008361144,0.007127344,0.0021828224,0.025473226,0.0029922994,0.000028106793,0.000043455337,0.000055598615,0.953736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20940657,0.0039980775,0.001708005,0.018828368,0.0013928257,0.00009067002,0.00009041081,0.00017704279,0.76430804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998779,0.00052539044,0.000020298467,0.00016098787,0.0003096763,0.00020463923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953294,0.0001719432,0.000028421851,0.00007466305,0.000116087685,0.000075938835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071379874,0.00055859436,0.00021935356,0.0010602181,0.0054472154,0.005280783,0.00075577066,0.002187479,0.018901113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016259019,0.00020186443,0.00028598792,0.0006482386,0.011393268,0.005622313,0.0025707872,0.004449224,0.0037010603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011301657,0.00002676356,0.00026806287,0.000058298938,0.000002844716,0.00017398508,0.024213346,0.00003589745,0.00033404166,0.849848,0.100969635,0.024057899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021045735,0.000011639902,0.0002518163,0.0001282443,0.000002328982,0.00015773371,0.008732235,0.00004674661,0.0002178532,0.025440725,0.9650028,0.0000058689525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009860274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021822087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018901113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028371166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018544791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063230515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182789741","doi":"","title":"Rainbow Family: Machine Listening, Improvisation and Access to Justice in International Family Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Active listening; Family law; Economic Justice; Commonwealth; Law; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Visual arts; Art; Communication","score_opus":0.020245183070773387,"score_gpt":0.312322274153491,"score_spread":0.2920770910827176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182789741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27871475,0.010414497,0.030801304,0.047736116,0.00049138075,0.00008637141,0.00006951537,0.00031047378,0.63137555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772546,0.0016377869,0.0025489475,0.0012712284,0.0000951369,0.000030235728,0.000010854996,0.000070562666,0.017080517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972626,0.0017519058,0.000075633085,0.00021778891,0.00042051353,0.00027157128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659216,0.002392238,0.00026288195,0.00034126328,0.00018069644,0.00023078214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00404323,0.00019891438,0.00018328127,0.0014270889,0.006252605,0.007421393,0.0008767244,0.001903706,0.01100379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012248784,0.00018291605,0.00017948945,0.0011901906,0.028665153,0.010470287,0.004224531,0.0022308382,0.00039456942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034329994,0.00003447547,0.0017035035,0.000041694002,0.000003824829,0.0003379692,0.12020861,0.00030149927,0.0002731215,0.81377494,0.007966013,0.055320024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020023343,0.00012094291,0.008112073,0.00059941615,0.000012888931,0.00093391736,0.19571255,0.002529998,0.001162207,0.47376755,0.31695542,0.000073022165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008343326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010858989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01100379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045331763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022489286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03681135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183775846","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3681","title":"Indigenous Feminist Legal Pedagogies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Work (physics); Legal education; Law","score_opus":0.030406583862605165,"score_gpt":0.32168490914324505,"score_spread":0.2912783252806399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183775846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0824571,0.014953651,0.0050953473,0.14817725,0.0010745006,0.000069474714,0.000049726346,0.000055499575,0.7480675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9313203,0.0063093277,0.0020521428,0.010450559,0.00039573782,0.00008302226,0.000017087561,0.000041325897,0.049330518],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990991,0.0047170944,0.00013458336,0.0004996131,0.0020572038,0.0016005392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663615,0.0018380402,0.00030940113,0.00016656387,0.00057926535,0.00047052547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060346257,0.0003417875,0.00036635913,0.001440678,0.017774079,0.0060326816,0.0011232434,0.0024916574,0.005815232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007333646,0.00015542189,0.00026655156,0.0014465159,0.03530858,0.004931268,0.005487616,0.0037143235,0.00040685225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004710154,0.00004005189,0.0012267075,0.00013136218,0.000003688224,0.00027575332,0.27558708,0.00009277099,0.00019057242,0.69827974,0.0070838127,0.017083796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046875516,0.000021580287,0.0029978869,0.00069057907,0.000007215405,0.000337926,0.31762245,0.00016904503,0.00035536455,0.08438752,0.59339213,0.000013582534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11514621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15027845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11514621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02085593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017624043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22895199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183977173","doi":"10.4000/ces.5823","title":"Stephen Morton. States of Emergency, Colonialism, Literature and Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Essays and Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Novelis (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.0402406670540034,"score_gpt":0.3505197165288585,"score_spread":0.3102790494748551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183977173","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014214717,0.2987566,0.0002281677,0.5892321,0.017566554,0.00001593121,0.0000952631,0.000030871,0.09265315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.092663884,0.2219529,0.0005865628,0.24829797,0.022594806,0.00008138548,0.000098184326,0.00010918295,0.41361505],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939346,0.0002111241,0.00002442627,0.0001031383,0.00018161093,0.00008627748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998206,0.0009835246,0.00020288923,0.000057506,0.0003126161,0.00023741765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007221114,0.00073902804,0.00027558187,0.0012102638,0.0046338555,0.003148943,0.00088440446,0.0061073983,0.015622508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003520709,0.00033134274,0.00022736093,0.0015073695,0.0042489665,0.0061462624,0.0020090835,0.004761324,0.0036311168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008953592,0.000015241528,0.00021177332,0.00010786183,0.0000022718573,0.000084909385,0.0019925053,0.00002112258,0.000034654066,0.061270118,0.92238456,0.013865977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059718063,0.000008524484,0.0008337926,0.00063507014,0.0000026716664,0.0001327023,0.0025926866,0.000025868132,0.00006705666,0.019371802,0.9763148,0.000009114562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041198317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07877676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041198317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030116905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002537677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08191705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185103983","doi":"","title":"'Don't Want to Get Exposed': Law's Violence and Access to Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Oppression; Harm; Sociology; Political science; Law; Restorative justice; Criminology; Public relations; Politics","score_opus":0.021560193566594027,"score_gpt":0.33432726592054407,"score_spread":0.31276707235395007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185103983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81867856,0.0037964978,0.0012555295,0.10099936,0.00032295907,0.000037905065,0.000033346885,0.000023992303,0.0748519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937657,0.0005377053,0.00008963636,0.0037495396,0.000012076882,0.000010864546,0.000003916817,0.000006382413,0.0018241871],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898872,0.007200658,0.00013963012,0.00033896987,0.0007658915,0.001667707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929254,0.0039518634,0.00066709006,0.00017575957,0.00055178005,0.0017280546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052368715,0.0002693122,0.00042849532,0.0009137218,0.02680567,0.010515468,0.001421227,0.0034981922,0.0034643945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01394498,0.00035803622,0.0002329663,0.0010233144,0.053224903,0.007305205,0.008680362,0.00693339,0.00025931594],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009753296,0.000019872165,0.0027705655,0.000033961544,0.0000043965615,0.00044682538,0.9685832,0.0000126163595,0.00008393187,0.022525731,0.001877171,0.0036319578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030520457,0.000008247859,0.0016586329,0.000114412105,0.0000036281738,0.00017850946,0.9842383,0.000026060918,0.000036037192,0.0038422286,0.009881177,0.0000097019065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21934752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30010808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21934752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013980129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014106517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4361416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186779917","doi":"","title":"Book review: The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography. By Irus Braverman, Nicholas Blomley, David Delaney, and Alexandre Kedar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2014. 296 pp. $27.95 paper.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Field (mathematics); Variety (cybernetics); Subject (documents); Political science; Law; Geography; Library science","score_opus":0.005090036709359145,"score_gpt":0.23541718385790494,"score_spread":0.2303271471485458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186779917","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018861129,0.7872439,0.0007480752,0.08808023,0.09511687,0.000061483566,0.00047401182,0.00013624683,0.027950622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0038308827,0.6736843,0.001213133,0.032920364,0.08300026,0.00014447,0.0010425209,0.00025549706,0.20390849],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862313,0.0002799682,0.00009389357,0.00018651075,0.0007121634,0.00010435858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543685,0.0020856215,0.00035302195,0.000117166666,0.0015451383,0.00046224231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012112159,0.0018454171,0.0018468018,0.0048967707,0.0013954205,0.0064259465,0.0017853668,0.002830611,0.04109522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005763855,0.00095319113,0.0008067652,0.0068223486,0.0018048933,0.0061109765,0.001835584,0.005112468,0.027456848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031362836,0.0000028180518,0.000019695897,0.00022075584,0.0000031192483,0.000009071468,0.000025793483,0.000019055376,0.000016259493,0.0007219629,0.9859679,0.012990402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053949434,0.000008891646,0.0002740344,0.001127182,0.0000072371267,0.00010512765,0.00011024903,0.000037734444,0.000026918387,0.0017307785,0.9965559,0.00001049531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006501072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016669368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04109522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034753543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005373682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13747722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3188615156","doi":"","title":"Unreliable Narration in Law and Fiction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Interpretation (philosophy); Agatha; Law and literature; Meaning (existential); Law; Quality (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Literature; Linguistics; Epistemology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0101788433215081,"score_gpt":0.2841914612756697,"score_spread":0.2740126179541616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3188615156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3752999,0.02658098,0.06401014,0.07197234,0.00327206,0.00008473766,0.00029471875,0.0003842444,0.45810086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883109,0.0016338626,0.0017903377,0.0010517237,0.00058357196,0.00002503726,0.000052902375,0.00010812461,0.0064435597],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98150235,0.01423924,0.0004483059,0.0007990465,0.0024785656,0.00053240283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9634489,0.027368927,0.0035274862,0.0025443272,0.0024952556,0.0006151085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006610992,0.0006520368,0.0004715988,0.002814633,0.0070098075,0.010094336,0.0012577089,0.0028687064,0.0045757536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043739818,0.00037845437,0.0002630657,0.0014028925,0.031470865,0.013947557,0.0076576956,0.0032409222,0.00086947303],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078956095,0.0000127828125,0.0019489103,0.00029446182,0.000018557248,0.0012532058,0.5162196,0.0004122516,0.00079192314,0.45047486,0.008753177,0.019741321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022103743,0.00008836304,0.0027160298,0.0012544406,0.000035949768,0.002065436,0.16830824,0.0012542123,0.0029755498,0.31300345,0.5081906,0.0000856904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020616052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018527533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010094336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003816192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014253103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034962654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189523956","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-74878-4_1","title":"Introduction: Legal Reason and the Ordeal of Romantic Reading","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Trial by ordeal; Romance; Reading (process); Argument (complex analysis); Autonomy; Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Law; Romanticism; Politics; Haven; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Literature; Art; History; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010362672855008791,"score_gpt":0.2439112325697363,"score_spread":0.2335485597147275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189523956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006491853,0.03187165,0.0020128542,0.021119976,0.0062799538,0.0000407959,0.0002599572,0.000106938336,0.9376587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024650069,0.027569735,0.0026419205,0.012676503,0.010564196,0.00011090266,0.00049081736,0.00033226216,0.9209636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996321,0.00012750017,0.000016597445,0.0000618504,0.00012495984,0.000036932066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882287,0.00085481757,0.0000302883,0.000043644483,0.00017451486,0.00007385232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000584959,0.00058115285,0.00051724585,0.0016643894,0.0027742803,0.004846594,0.0008787698,0.0026245108,0.07569491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017498903,0.00034009264,0.0003410025,0.0018658914,0.0034665042,0.00522095,0.0015376697,0.005136667,0.015984287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007534454,0.000025398658,0.0000641833,0.00011821205,0.0000015328661,0.00004698497,0.0016489446,0.000055420882,0.00008786993,0.5791124,0.39211226,0.02671919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018806634,0.000004620693,0.00014695298,0.00025950282,0.0000011142413,0.000085311265,0.00042797884,0.000046282275,0.00003447275,0.06826289,0.9307236,0.0000054115317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036579377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008728667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07569491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019174899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001492703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25322473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191740208","doi":"10.1177/17438721211026880","title":"<i>Belt v Lawes</i> and the Meaning of Authorship","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Meaning (existential); Sculpture; Law; Drama; Art; Sociology; Visual arts; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029280695704060736,"score_gpt":0.2576960200962915,"score_spread":0.22841532439223078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191740208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038742315,0.012810033,0.0029753556,0.30279243,0.0023081314,0.000026721069,0.000067160625,0.000044876037,0.64023304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89360416,0.0024791001,0.00074966747,0.05081391,0.001886293,0.000069614856,0.000029792638,0.00004353666,0.050323986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98923326,0.0057221414,0.00052179024,0.00095274206,0.0023451953,0.0012248066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98680556,0.009589988,0.0011689242,0.0007100528,0.0012256906,0.0004998254],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010525301,0.00028759782,0.00042516013,0.0019722232,0.01043611,0.016798582,0.0016326691,0.014974892,0.0036657315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03418369,0.00040620004,0.0003282361,0.0015658328,0.047339693,0.015294054,0.005040983,0.009802502,0.0005018773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006135134,0.000003395016,0.00011241655,0.000007751136,6.780002e-7,0.000049151542,0.0034672718,0.00001137106,0.00002394966,0.9889197,0.0061298385,0.0012683544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032677723,0.00001970113,0.0009515331,0.0004589244,0.000007761677,0.00019815365,0.006703563,0.0002254419,0.00027788914,0.7548321,0.23625875,0.000033559925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011963182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01633553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074754953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004817999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055663764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191878260","doi":"","title":"Does Constitutional Change Matter - Canada's Recognition of Aboriginal Title [Article]","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.00784147122435767,"score_gpt":0.20969016427009446,"score_spread":0.2018486930457368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191878260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12331727,0.002739323,0.00048490317,0.062056046,0.0009499785,0.000050839422,0.00068397477,0.000046252357,0.8096714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9183124,0.0009859501,0.0001987199,0.01094077,0.00013990815,0.000014549026,0.00014774287,0.000050099763,0.06920988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931734,0.00058305875,0.00013714851,0.00072287937,0.002340274,0.0030431747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99215734,0.0012801737,0.0003933567,0.00045692272,0.0045150146,0.0011972203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042610927,0.00014613627,0.00044970986,0.001112466,0.0158658,0.011723671,0.0018225124,0.004047979,0.016705174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015937464,0.00022797831,0.00031389284,0.0019149182,0.010194422,0.0025316218,0.0020880508,0.0035100253,0.0010808825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009767035,0.00003656984,0.01399955,0.00008607919,0.00003431411,0.00030245126,0.013109304,0.00028628396,0.0007427149,0.8769422,0.07512323,0.019239686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008357123,0.000062738254,0.08428402,0.0006395083,0.00018735132,0.00021130913,0.039263148,0.00092421105,0.0018062958,0.06628886,0.80607253,0.00017649816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97220784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064203635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.064203635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12992278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46583217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193946424","doi":"10.33920/nik-01-2102-07","title":"The concept of legal custom in philosophy, cultural studies and legal anthropology","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Voprosy kul turologii (Issues of Cultural Studies)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Transitive relation; Cultural anthropology; Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Legal pluralism; Legal realism; Legal research; Anthropology; Social science; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05280021178538071,"score_gpt":0.38719247680675384,"score_spread":0.33439226502137315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193946424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35110274,0.11773958,0.034694433,0.087854244,0.0012199177,0.00014369503,0.00018512645,0.000066564724,0.4069937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98615694,0.008331378,0.0028044581,0.00093678455,0.00027206595,0.000040700157,0.000014663672,0.000008285868,0.0014347832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933648,0.0052630305,0.0002233647,0.0003227821,0.0005575558,0.00026859698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994972,0.0039495914,0.0004702797,0.00025569575,0.00019755246,0.00015475844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006531565,0.00025129,0.00041749305,0.0043192175,0.00372855,0.0054323897,0.0006157667,0.0016840902,0.0010480264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041652313,0.0001714507,0.00020667477,0.0050945007,0.058251206,0.006892066,0.0031945626,0.0023974823,0.00006547506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038417047,0.000009925623,0.0008505907,0.00005866109,0.0000036685115,0.00006139591,0.01752698,0.000116389696,0.000058001784,0.9761614,0.0004400048,0.0047091264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009390307,0.00005338018,0.0070208055,0.00055920135,0.000010587166,0.00032228586,0.040582884,0.00062660704,0.00022315832,0.8843098,0.06625368,0.000028312686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045891344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031790577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006531565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005700475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004294677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04136002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197190868","doi":"","title":"A profound difference: Visualising politics through obsolete media","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1030607748396696,"score_gpt":0.3313182903532338,"score_spread":0.22825751551356419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197190868","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13949604,0.015882231,0.04730459,0.055648502,0.005437714,0.00011185921,0.00028036733,0.00088093313,0.7349577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91813767,0.0036965355,0.011808822,0.0043397965,0.0011160389,0.00014798436,0.000117175834,0.0011577005,0.059478275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949916,0.0036486413,0.000077393255,0.00032659998,0.0006050767,0.00035078483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551857,0.0029676277,0.00023161997,0.0006523419,0.00025399448,0.00037585737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045613046,0.0006470177,0.0003130429,0.0019861404,0.0064045186,0.021424487,0.00131416,0.0021004055,0.015617274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0094356295,0.00046632567,0.00044220564,0.0013191088,0.02409026,0.017669614,0.011339016,0.0043168967,0.0015573107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014989484,0.00002844009,0.0010251848,0.00033291907,0.000021698877,0.0005153766,0.3804123,0.00027707324,0.0021631625,0.5267679,0.029314175,0.058991898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026137768,0.00004958601,0.0010088176,0.00048372056,0.000020536654,0.00042631678,0.11871194,0.00035523114,0.001049414,0.08323669,0.79459274,0.00003884319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020592208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003874776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021424487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031785967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016218309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05224502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198150079","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-78803-2_4","title":"Method Matters: Non-normative Jurisprudence and the Re-mystification of the Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Law and philosophy library","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Normative; Jurisprudence; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Neutrality; Writ; Law; Philosophy of law; Philosophy; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Comparative law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01956681868989274,"score_gpt":0.26192151971345784,"score_spread":0.2423547010235651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198150079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004580931,0.044741392,0.049359735,0.1972956,0.004616353,0.00008860283,0.00011579397,0.00023046527,0.6989711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50459886,0.019602446,0.048194885,0.073459394,0.00987973,0.00078330515,0.00020843711,0.0014428567,0.34183007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822724,0.012380245,0.0004162494,0.0011560632,0.0031409352,0.00063408015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631013,0.031334978,0.0006162167,0.0024256955,0.00193057,0.00059128227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021146478,0.00075940025,0.0012873815,0.002080908,0.00554554,0.014932384,0.003030698,0.007326929,0.009082333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027414104,0.00089555804,0.00070522854,0.0017342848,0.06874316,0.025281295,0.0042806836,0.015259781,0.002182624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002996079,0.00000843354,0.000024028906,0.00002766921,0.0000018675587,0.000009506005,0.00123698,0.000018106326,0.000019544363,0.99027854,0.0057662064,0.00260615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008859262,0.0000041252865,0.00005695304,0.000105714906,0.0000025441975,0.00003364886,0.0004689742,0.00014057965,0.00006763889,0.93641084,0.062693596,0.0000065548384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063884603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008492845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021146478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072626956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009677425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111834586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198245012","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Everyday Law on the Street: City Governance in an Age of Diversity, by Mariana Valverde","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Corporate governance; Inclusion (mineral); Representation (politics); Politics; Sociology; Local governance; Political science; Public administration; Law; Social science; Management","score_opus":0.022975939995956637,"score_gpt":0.2673767208098702,"score_spread":0.24440078081391353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198245012","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008981025,0.8785632,0.00011771417,0.06970276,0.03925611,0.00002731235,0.00035060625,0.000027609303,0.011864884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017777331,0.8700935,0.00018544543,0.045016963,0.036680963,0.00008965871,0.00050337595,0.000062235034,0.045590222],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989008,0.00019432289,0.00009212595,0.00015425043,0.0005697182,0.00008882694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959264,0.0017109192,0.00022951598,0.00010005414,0.0016762782,0.00035691858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094317115,0.0010044015,0.0018024121,0.0029886016,0.0014727182,0.0057975193,0.0017361507,0.0036547587,0.01943978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008352042,0.0005765664,0.00047785477,0.008145959,0.002333791,0.0034058397,0.0013805052,0.0045211785,0.009158608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023621885,0.0000020972084,0.000020180289,0.00042093263,0.000003331515,0.000006140206,0.000024253186,0.000015201706,0.000008156271,0.00063625426,0.9910946,0.007766558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006540831,0.0000046620908,0.00029733471,0.0014484465,0.000007397467,0.000058598394,0.00007477301,0.000009811246,0.0000070929386,0.00048683456,0.9975923,0.0000061386027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058803294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14581558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058803294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070443535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011590576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11692202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199856749","doi":"10.5210/spir.v2021i0.12240","title":"WHICH HUMAN FACES CAN AN AI GENERATE? LACK OF DIVERSITY IN THIS PERSON DOES NOT EXIST","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Generative grammar; Face (sociological concept); Python (programming language); Artificial intelligence; Diversity (politics); Programming language; Sociology","score_opus":0.12960052027376603,"score_gpt":0.4068000100891379,"score_spread":0.2771994898153719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199856749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7858012,0.0005777318,0.10853625,0.004856349,0.00029186724,0.00018967004,0.0006158721,0.00060089334,0.098530106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98349804,0.00010084323,0.011330284,0.0005006809,0.000033372726,0.000034075885,0.00012372645,0.00005420855,0.0043246737],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997015,0.0013095598,0.000090203015,0.0004976298,0.0009025064,0.00018513399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99341244,0.0028812413,0.00063275936,0.002205976,0.0006322934,0.00023530274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026734218,0.00030902377,0.0003913713,0.00074581575,0.0016402417,0.0021510844,0.00041625695,0.0008838835,0.0061138766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012758928,0.00021446342,0.00027352758,0.00041683967,0.002411807,0.002215541,0.0012461048,0.001030491,0.0013818238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001955873,0.0003680271,0.16103241,0.0006335389,0.0003960749,0.003639905,0.031637948,0.01895613,0.062283807,0.21390177,0.035864808,0.4693297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011801856,0.0011393945,0.19315656,0.0006223707,0.00028195427,0.023649883,0.03797201,0.21652086,0.080449976,0.20411527,0.24142341,0.0005503245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012131528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011243359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061138766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068637513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024055412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020452976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200945282","doi":"10.47577/tssj.v23i1.4454","title":"Political Engagement, Skill Application and Creativity in Social Advocacy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Technium Social Sciences Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Politics; Solidarity; Public relations; Social engagement; Social activism; Social change; Indigenous; Political science; Social work; Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.04073246731843475,"score_gpt":0.3877960325986812,"score_spread":0.3470635652802464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200945282","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49202263,0.0010207536,0.025808478,0.012241165,0.00015602063,0.0003327539,0.000016397034,0.00006870256,0.46833315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99041396,0.00019547735,0.004695418,0.00032438265,0.000033982935,0.000104158586,0.0000064796045,0.000013096828,0.0042130556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789867,0.014609961,0.0005528951,0.0007567962,0.0026188109,0.002474803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780694,0.01651236,0.0018672725,0.001117937,0.0008162747,0.0016167158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01329617,0.0004430839,0.00034650989,0.0029348738,0.00905523,0.011240241,0.0012703261,0.0025315618,0.0043387217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018878905,0.00029296393,0.000589046,0.0016478498,0.03282398,0.005180681,0.013101207,0.0034236524,0.00038445037],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094509924,0.0007257223,0.025048915,0.00038429373,0.00003687568,0.0027561067,0.3948469,0.0010683237,0.0019367882,0.44329768,0.0022462453,0.12755765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012458148,0.00035125663,0.041873325,0.0011893924,0.000040329094,0.0061093327,0.32493284,0.0042047654,0.002989693,0.4466563,0.17139462,0.00013355844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019461911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024142344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01329617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033133028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005953284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070317745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201355671","doi":"10.21991/cf29428","title":"Harnessing Distrust and the Power of Intercession for the Separation of Powers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Separation of powers; Legislature; Polity; Politics; Opposition (politics); Democracy; Political science; Distrust; Loyalty; Incentive; Law and economics; Law; Universal suffrage; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.01716585480203391,"score_gpt":0.3060020321003856,"score_spread":0.2888361772983517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201355671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04819024,0.01005319,0.12172404,0.24655105,0.0027688928,0.00008887321,0.000047019064,0.00017584616,0.5704009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92541885,0.0030791783,0.010384782,0.02415487,0.001574158,0.00019412051,0.000016969714,0.00017692041,0.035000183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992141,0.005208818,0.00014050503,0.0006433731,0.00097146985,0.00089477055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906046,0.0058639254,0.000986082,0.0012326089,0.00068145146,0.00063135766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009218207,0.00062303845,0.00054898945,0.0012509098,0.00891531,0.013556064,0.0017433007,0.0056381943,0.0044485293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011426572,0.00030837333,0.0007064985,0.00085159845,0.073044874,0.014702561,0.009682769,0.012001559,0.0009167791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000400113,0.0000042143392,0.00006929917,0.00000970352,0.0000014411307,0.00003471645,0.005427488,0.00005193447,0.000049844253,0.99188906,0.0013015262,0.0011567291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009795386,0.000018626228,0.00013192066,0.00009722657,0.0000048650622,0.0001250733,0.0045543546,0.00032857154,0.00033010912,0.89333206,0.10105213,0.000015321544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002539578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035985524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013556064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005376448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034083915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048751116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201848122","doi":"10.1558/genl.20884","title":"Intersections of race and gender in sexual assault trials","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gender and Language","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Racism; Gender studies; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0699826002765291,"score_gpt":0.3695686096152751,"score_spread":0.299586009338746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201848122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4524683,0.0049488414,0.0074059768,0.022568943,0.00041617345,0.00008599067,0.000031432683,0.000024390944,0.51204985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99370277,0.0006091048,0.00031101707,0.00050482096,0.00006897541,0.000047099038,0.000005224351,0.000014639762,0.004736295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97433203,0.019729355,0.00062819914,0.0009046214,0.0024267451,0.001979059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843888,0.0117474655,0.001624504,0.0005847684,0.0009105587,0.0007439663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011368696,0.00034215493,0.00078542304,0.0021163498,0.015666664,0.01383748,0.0015454642,0.0031571726,0.0069531593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032285597,0.00044754107,0.0004547143,0.0016310728,0.05077165,0.012197517,0.013165252,0.004927067,0.00055624923],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044435677,0.000029201832,0.002024656,0.000056097386,0.000005308218,0.0007336766,0.30579704,0.00006206378,0.00029563022,0.682358,0.0006154416,0.007978459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029997374,0.00011804285,0.005228002,0.0007769434,0.000029989193,0.0013771349,0.60495096,0.00034945703,0.0011453131,0.3052527,0.080678366,0.00006322682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00758401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069091925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015666664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004931862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004262888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0601241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201938823","doi":"10.7202/1081839ar","title":"Des enjeux des audiences à distance","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.028380951242879458,"score_gpt":0.2759616079960725,"score_spread":0.24758065675319305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201938823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33797923,0.002542209,0.00733125,0.01442017,0.00053297,0.00008173975,0.00015419608,0.00008711405,0.63687116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9052213,0.000989243,0.0007571485,0.0011531117,0.00011536137,0.000046609144,0.000039662853,0.00005430402,0.09162324],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944543,0.002528588,0.00009031331,0.0005142671,0.0015085301,0.00090401765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951929,0.0013910715,0.0004636321,0.00026219233,0.0017264409,0.000963824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00349717,0.0005598945,0.00037349586,0.0016980981,0.01372221,0.012430321,0.0009591906,0.002310383,0.019939726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068826796,0.00022778884,0.00037179087,0.0013595206,0.013262489,0.006070947,0.006130963,0.0035494214,0.0015165999],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000584662,0.000041041672,0.009069709,0.00016068786,0.000015785296,0.0007927446,0.6587289,0.0001408359,0.0013898971,0.28855786,0.007997954,0.033046167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014576297,0.00007552055,0.017117089,0.0005530876,0.000027803475,0.00045338308,0.50411904,0.00031642005,0.00065958424,0.01608709,0.4605107,0.00006577045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22940066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2942348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22940066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016124927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009249603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4561308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205044545","doi":"10.1017/9781108539296.007","title":"The Rights-versus-Rites Binary in Popular Legal Consciousness","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Legal consciousness; Political science; Psychology; Law; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.02187942050530787,"score_gpt":0.2361279225008164,"score_spread":0.21424850199550854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205044545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015741581,0.011438506,0.004288321,0.036667638,0.00045210018,0.000015631864,0.0000523638,0.000033014287,0.9313109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87061626,0.003637272,0.001498723,0.0043506627,0.0012846512,0.000086073735,0.00004901388,0.0001298603,0.1183475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792224,0.0012437423,0.000053760592,0.0002040235,0.00036506788,0.00021113321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820113,0.0012992148,0.000084787745,0.00018738772,0.00012290289,0.000104512634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024762775,0.00044285672,0.00042803626,0.0010475931,0.004571661,0.011505275,0.00083622616,0.004979559,0.00874961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004324766,0.00036540412,0.0001943595,0.0015512377,0.043856364,0.013715894,0.0026088902,0.00631842,0.0010298225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014637674,0.0000019984539,0.0000094099205,0.0000041281924,3.1180417e-7,0.0000039078973,0.0016797082,0.000007804656,0.000009176028,0.9960594,0.0012318719,0.0009908563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006095586,0.0000032061282,0.00013445954,0.00006354763,0.000001680709,0.000016743777,0.0019152547,0.00009547066,0.000045963065,0.94512147,0.052591335,0.000004776926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045163436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073041087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011505275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043067634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024647848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031247914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205795936","doi":"","title":"Introduction: Sounding Justice in Pandemic Times","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Active listening; Economic Justice; Scholarship; Work (physics); Law; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Engineering","score_opus":0.016256951026581035,"score_gpt":0.2860261077001902,"score_spread":0.2697691566736092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205795936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071963225,0.044094577,0.0034173564,0.3074205,0.20570798,0.000115034796,0.0013635535,0.0005434473,0.43014118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1500387,0.03616775,0.0034876983,0.12200061,0.19980468,0.00025684992,0.0011869951,0.0012655709,0.48579118],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899524,0.00038491096,0.00004513296,0.00013276542,0.00032484828,0.00011701331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979938,0.0010997321,0.00010719721,0.00013491898,0.00041856963,0.00024586217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010938342,0.00067709485,0.0004252432,0.0012196515,0.0045370855,0.0051333024,0.0007851132,0.003006256,0.029097155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055686017,0.0002735547,0.0003793171,0.00077637506,0.0029121896,0.00433852,0.0026076287,0.004685397,0.006280679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015011146,0.0000132446885,0.00018414656,0.000124649,0.000002524791,0.00006238333,0.0051818546,0.00004953889,0.00018240657,0.054867607,0.9220805,0.017236125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001807639,0.000014352947,0.00044384575,0.0002609358,0.0000013985092,0.000089772424,0.0021837377,0.000037813355,0.00007641349,0.006315493,0.9905661,0.000008328345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021331222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037128523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029097155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018827072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019116193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09733975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205805984","doi":"10.1177/17416590211050333","title":"Technology facilitated re-victimization: How video evidence of sexual violence contributes to mediated cycles of abuse","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crime Media Culture An International Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Criminal justice; Economic Justice; Criminology; Sexual abuse; Psychology; Sexual violence; Social psychology; Internet privacy; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Political science; Computer science; Law; Medical emergency; Medicine","score_opus":0.033692610667213733,"score_gpt":0.3394363744993302,"score_spread":0.30574376383211643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205805984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9081385,0.0045846286,0.007539099,0.017051809,0.00012223158,0.00020292342,0.00017546609,0.000053871136,0.06213146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99546885,0.0015116137,0.0011424266,0.000429143,0.00002278571,0.000044856366,0.000040838095,0.000018900937,0.0013205154],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821937,0.012773323,0.0006338595,0.0009379407,0.0022397363,0.0012213393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94888186,0.03734369,0.0062557817,0.0032284074,0.0029722825,0.001317971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010259979,0.0004356935,0.00039499314,0.0039746873,0.008443267,0.013005786,0.0022388168,0.0021475255,0.0063629854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07036011,0.0006550832,0.00054975867,0.002150725,0.016539164,0.010621319,0.009273334,0.0031259835,0.00039531128],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099876874,0.00013737408,0.0672006,0.00044586227,0.00007704444,0.003551884,0.81725454,0.00019483519,0.0007306424,0.040403638,0.0019459907,0.06795764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022216673,0.0001378504,0.048058547,0.0022094126,0.0001625733,0.0060825613,0.85710573,0.0009256148,0.0013509322,0.026854072,0.056978796,0.00011172199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044900462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05348787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044900462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065966677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007956825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08927828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205819181","doi":"10.3917/drs1.108.0443","title":"La genèse des droits de propriété des auteurs de cinéma : une comparaison transnationale du droit d’auteur et du copyright","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Droit et société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02167118148964683,"score_gpt":0.3126184913931269,"score_spread":0.2909473099034801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205819181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94121045,0.00081062876,0.0013059258,0.0005298945,0.000019046134,0.000014606549,0.00019992993,0.0000084867725,0.055901017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99704784,0.00017802915,0.00025304058,0.000018887871,0.000005472227,0.0000066277503,0.000048768918,0.000005357993,0.0024360192],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815136,0.0006200798,0.000095425996,0.00033841972,0.00048981013,0.00030490835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99133587,0.003834433,0.002004009,0.0005179289,0.0017504157,0.0005573289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021728994,0.00016027616,0.00023485554,0.00299223,0.0014351454,0.004701792,0.00028707267,0.00040616014,0.006953989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006874747,0.0001383022,0.0002193724,0.002600635,0.003080841,0.0034483941,0.00214636,0.000882341,0.00028371264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025782431,0.00009618253,0.45801726,0.0002066749,0.0001632507,0.00045370217,0.22396144,0.000699914,0.0069880886,0.2035338,0.0011852839,0.104436584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062703475,0.000096110125,0.8752372,0.00018705407,0.000047018504,0.00043181825,0.085501,0.00060619594,0.0013638597,0.007267875,0.029198667,0.000057015473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027596854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03017826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027596854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029083884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011141793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054872453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206108056","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198861577.003.0001","title":"Women’s Representation on High Courts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Political science; History; Law","score_opus":0.03487432059720849,"score_gpt":0.2968380690212811,"score_spread":0.26196374842407266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206108056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087256745,0.009617731,0.00034566637,0.016603228,0.00045358666,0.0000093905865,0.00017417768,0.0000149528305,0.8855244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8181396,0.004905498,0.00012623225,0.0016123692,0.0002990533,0.000010817226,0.00010506581,0.000018026107,0.17478336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990752,0.0003836203,0.000011794932,0.00007542133,0.00028341633,0.00017050862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992894,0.00041555215,0.00007200274,0.000026280337,0.00011338915,0.00008333972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005231899,0.00009216195,0.00011567057,0.000573231,0.0017316343,0.0031043016,0.0003107112,0.00038858844,0.01404205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017507527,0.00005695645,0.000067489775,0.0012453425,0.002059015,0.0011467629,0.000985051,0.00088952977,0.0007641606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004276118,0.000045328175,0.007253798,0.00014075753,0.0000068332656,0.0002505439,0.0708767,0.0002223906,0.0005538341,0.6469302,0.14359957,0.13007723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041177577,0.000040945073,0.025146542,0.0005234678,0.000004683717,0.00022307131,0.037863925,0.00014858507,0.0007543387,0.01969701,0.9155791,0.000014217398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0102870185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027518995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01404205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029113202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010808721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046975315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206161984","doi":"","title":"The evidentiary value of an accused’s invocation of the pre-trial and trial right to silence through Anglo American case law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"South African Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; Law; Witness; Circumstantial evidence; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Common law; Privilege (computing); Political science; Sociology; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027628740797827317,"score_gpt":0.3128767867875584,"score_spread":0.2852480459897311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206161984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34800237,0.008437339,0.02936643,0.041027956,0.00043847732,0.00008308756,0.0000738217,0.00003643613,0.57253414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99090403,0.0008831038,0.0014418453,0.0015742081,0.00013979302,0.000033663557,0.000010123029,0.000008091822,0.0050051473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879287,0.007108901,0.000561738,0.0011203261,0.0020520254,0.0012283624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96729726,0.02699393,0.0014009416,0.0013105832,0.0024536764,0.0005435419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015972126,0.00024432503,0.00036905377,0.0013029191,0.005193762,0.009972431,0.0015323187,0.0048171715,0.0015503694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02905911,0.0004241675,0.000267871,0.0007996366,0.045567017,0.0069245603,0.0047328635,0.007185463,0.0002667501],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001186725,0.0000074740233,0.00036736668,0.000020012629,0.0000034292143,0.00017060613,0.010793673,0.00007171809,0.000177483,0.9857734,0.00039836075,0.0022045944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037582595,0.00013715675,0.005103321,0.0012435336,0.00012588504,0.0010861136,0.02372504,0.0018528966,0.0024090395,0.8692122,0.09494443,0.00012273109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015834494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021064414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015972126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073134913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005732671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084469676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206654628","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198861577.003.0006","title":"International Influences on Women’s Representation on High Courts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.028088981102283108,"score_gpt":0.3160485558219601,"score_spread":0.28795957471967704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206654628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1458602,0.0011407799,0.00037737397,0.004474579,0.000117975826,0.000019104102,0.000046279725,0.000008751167,0.84795505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96991473,0.0006687918,0.000092653565,0.0006283581,0.00006529558,0.0000140487045,0.000023977826,0.000017016418,0.028575156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948939,0.0023234128,0.0000983815,0.00037232626,0.00095792627,0.001354032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951793,0.0026139722,0.000699062,0.00019273127,0.00061495026,0.0006998985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030915916,0.00016722789,0.0001765001,0.0017051063,0.0056192055,0.007404864,0.0006747205,0.0008393884,0.017723262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008885453,0.00014406769,0.00015190478,0.0027120602,0.005603802,0.0013921314,0.0036495277,0.0022262533,0.00078608235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081957245,0.00014666832,0.034126718,0.00010099985,0.000015767953,0.0017221665,0.1325265,0.00036958558,0.001058154,0.7406863,0.02807408,0.061091114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019253948,0.000104452294,0.10541928,0.00070782704,0.00003061844,0.00088118395,0.17750345,0.00038637314,0.002156837,0.02675861,0.685978,0.000054193737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017585581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043015566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017723262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005586162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002369998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05929023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207227360","doi":"","title":"Beyond Conventional \"Womanhood\": Feminist Legal Scholarship and Gender Identities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Feminism; Law; Sociology; Realm; Argument (complex analysis); Feminist legal theory; Human rights; Legal doctrine; Identity (music); Legislation; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.07293320444593983,"score_gpt":0.3404063522690596,"score_spread":0.26747314782311976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207227360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043348916,0.10808782,0.008603784,0.4167197,0.002157225,0.000021404669,0.00009913733,0.000029505192,0.4209325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9043199,0.033623066,0.0019074458,0.027963871,0.0024376928,0.00007236117,0.000041857307,0.00006214142,0.029571772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99380106,0.00400616,0.0000918073,0.00048614162,0.0010076725,0.0006071933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932225,0.005270162,0.0003864507,0.00026021866,0.0004381128,0.00042260866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008492816,0.0004987878,0.0004903477,0.003123463,0.015542714,0.011997359,0.0018162965,0.00525024,0.005527794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064742067,0.00029176674,0.00028675975,0.0023823641,0.100219905,0.012811254,0.006298924,0.0071054352,0.0005551121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037015186,0.0000070583205,0.00019330726,0.00002945548,0.000001055904,0.00005429785,0.03451707,0.000033533957,0.000027042293,0.9571523,0.0033989602,0.0045822333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000087263215,0.000013665236,0.00069071393,0.0009203425,0.0000033738845,0.00014316355,0.06890609,0.00019028936,0.00014963173,0.58869976,0.3402603,0.000013873035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041068435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050735503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041068435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020058718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0091817435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1455369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207290388","doi":"10.3917/drs1.108.0337","title":"« Si on m’avait écouté dès le début, si on avait écouté mon récit. » Le narrativisme comme legs de la Critical Race Theory dans la pensée juridique canadienne","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Droit et société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.020959989692942094,"score_gpt":0.31821006861895723,"score_spread":0.2972500789260151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207290388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14233513,0.0061688484,0.074066296,0.061302464,0.0024431006,0.00028617244,0.00022300195,0.00014450292,0.7130305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8990934,0.0020273488,0.009212787,0.003229228,0.00025928344,0.00023839928,0.00006074884,0.000112246555,0.085766554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99213976,0.005853922,0.00011975616,0.000619935,0.00087152014,0.00039502428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99473155,0.0030664613,0.0005329354,0.00051292335,0.00074642355,0.0004096841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070274333,0.0005647124,0.00038600876,0.0012620625,0.011473328,0.008837793,0.001324541,0.002349556,0.01092697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012946813,0.0002740703,0.00035753378,0.0012792288,0.025251025,0.008147816,0.004581084,0.004555664,0.0012688803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033301305,0.000021811762,0.0010682594,0.000106136875,0.0000067115257,0.00019777288,0.23522483,0.000092139206,0.0004238343,0.7460538,0.0053243767,0.011447112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023180915,0.00007726464,0.0018878703,0.00063025526,0.0000240563,0.00040789042,0.19569764,0.00047922877,0.0019374294,0.15750511,0.6412751,0.00005494278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011274224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018470455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9887258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064673247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071650576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046923935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207718715","doi":"","title":"Condominium Government and the Right to Live in the City","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Downtown; Government (linguistics); Unit (ring theory); Work (physics); Democracy; Private property; Order (exchange); Business; Public administration; Architecture; Political science; Law; Geography; Engineering; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.01238187251999719,"score_gpt":0.2282459653268253,"score_spread":0.2158640928068281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207718715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17583695,0.0050088763,0.0008998334,0.019830715,0.00015305118,0.000029894736,0.00006113969,0.000014967245,0.79816455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94325435,0.0014288909,0.00019759816,0.0011790498,0.000036264697,0.000013573917,0.00003056643,0.0000078231,0.05385186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799854,0.0005153112,0.000039893654,0.00012866166,0.00040067654,0.0009168853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988059,0.0002564662,0.00013154169,0.00008162298,0.0002925943,0.00043193324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091393985,0.00015456043,0.00015095498,0.00049858197,0.011390776,0.008034164,0.0006685427,0.0016841142,0.010303402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018233097,0.00018050428,0.00009922972,0.0010825214,0.017012216,0.0014033843,0.004244786,0.0026199801,0.0005228663],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026068978,0.00003535936,0.011549978,0.000058614438,0.000005299559,0.0006480764,0.051161896,0.00035868597,0.00026426237,0.8958193,0.013426873,0.026645537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003291166,0.000029939069,0.030286178,0.0005344357,0.000014465497,0.00053647906,0.07636425,0.0002905977,0.00035796393,0.06317613,0.8283434,0.000033249915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4699143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6857901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4699143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014723578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014885366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9343582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207955632","doi":"","title":"‘ISLANDS OF EMPOWERMENT’: ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAW AND THE QUESTION OF RACIAL EMANCIPATION","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Emancipation; Empowerment; Sociology; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Politics","score_opus":0.010409303221673246,"score_gpt":0.3036611002011306,"score_spread":0.2932517969794573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207955632","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019956548,0.021802709,0.005157054,0.5255805,0.0021727034,0.000023366525,0.000022067059,0.00003972249,0.42524534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86678606,0.0063691246,0.0017184603,0.06187873,0.0029431076,0.000119268334,0.000020209796,0.00008714789,0.060077824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930784,0.004174398,0.0001017674,0.0006270456,0.0009051264,0.001113134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956185,0.0031052425,0.00026612994,0.0003176237,0.00035927954,0.00033322631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007220643,0.00048870884,0.00047094535,0.0012627472,0.012836576,0.010044936,0.0018630363,0.008230514,0.0046495125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011998681,0.00032535705,0.00035187326,0.001037058,0.07135285,0.015958462,0.009151285,0.010678845,0.0005337521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004627338,0.000004543194,0.0000687032,0.000008900531,0.0000011034488,0.000046564383,0.0057022017,0.000020511996,0.00002327006,0.984177,0.007148948,0.0027935621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001330053,0.000012031405,0.0003196505,0.00014853437,0.0000030572055,0.00008422637,0.00826465,0.00014029157,0.00015654536,0.7166849,0.27416068,0.000012133797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011609815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011854941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012836576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005799298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059590205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042077005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209246783","doi":"10.25904/1912/324","title":"In Search of the 'Golden Thread': Common Law Interactions With Indigenous Law in Canada, Australia and New Zealand","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Indigenous; Common law; Comparative law; Public law; Municipal law; Political science","score_opus":0.08561377329561203,"score_gpt":0.3774399695564152,"score_spread":0.29182619626080314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209246783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9461806,0.0022157205,0.00025613472,0.012738249,0.00006384531,0.00008621966,0.00004938668,0.000009080407,0.038400766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98707205,0.0019663554,0.00027933888,0.001203938,0.000015377167,0.000025480256,0.000029187724,0.000010458952,0.009397809],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936266,0.0010663781,0.00014244828,0.0004040128,0.002389484,0.0023710688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948237,0.001130773,0.0008864828,0.000098435834,0.0014470574,0.0016135235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030934159,0.00032589192,0.0006097746,0.0029465002,0.026722338,0.00811249,0.0020226287,0.0017418532,0.0033659774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007696587,0.0004623655,0.0004229804,0.0046841493,0.01722362,0.0031979976,0.0057328525,0.0040805037,0.00014658719],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029152083,0.00006041632,0.033729434,0.00016382079,0.000027634007,0.0018307202,0.9148148,0.0001870969,0.0007950583,0.027222697,0.0036260602,0.017513124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072616385,0.000029271832,0.100568786,0.00019012888,0.00002585103,0.00025006992,0.8498325,0.00025106492,0.00015434419,0.0012361038,0.047387496,0.00006716972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12391435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12391435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13237308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8990658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211596152","doi":"","title":"Canada's Wonderlands: Can a Convicted Sex Offender Subject to a Section 161(1)(a) Order Legally Enter an Amusement Park?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amusement; Section (typography); Exhibition; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Theme park; Meaning (existential); Law; Subject (documents); Statutory law; Statutory interpretation; Order (exchange); Political science; History; Advertising; Business; Psychology; Computer science; Tourism; Library science; Social psychology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.009219606794709219,"score_gpt":0.2533890630515244,"score_spread":0.24416945625681521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211596152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20942067,0.0023503695,0.0014340046,0.16292883,0.00081888644,0.00015514894,0.0013233921,0.00006399357,0.6215047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85247535,0.001398722,0.00065560406,0.04330174,0.00010999344,0.00004745798,0.00021720605,0.000027453058,0.10176642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975878,0.0002031933,0.00006165531,0.00027118018,0.0006149732,0.0012613474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767965,0.00073026115,0.00014848688,0.000090382964,0.00075348996,0.0005978614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015687138,0.0002975511,0.00030909505,0.0005681661,0.020594556,0.0062467414,0.0020712623,0.0074293856,0.007847902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00642834,0.00039677866,0.00035488486,0.0008478303,0.009206825,0.0022991474,0.0026194558,0.006020733,0.0005947477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113042246,0.00007262229,0.02576084,0.00012116611,0.000024658117,0.0043572653,0.042216066,0.0004193593,0.0008552572,0.71313226,0.19214228,0.02078522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114626346,0.00008945202,0.06481878,0.0010241807,0.00017233023,0.00200633,0.1818805,0.0024655652,0.0019436561,0.06828151,0.6768705,0.0003325489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9868096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041833855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041833855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.112491556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3035273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211762083","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3925229","title":"The Natural Right to Parody: Assessing the (Potential) Parody/Satire Dichotomies in American and Canadian Copyright Laws (Originally in Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 2018; Updated Version Republished on SSRN, January 2021)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Law; Yearbook; Economic Justice; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0062422603133821955,"score_gpt":0.2854715226692719,"score_spread":0.2792292623558897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211762083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75384927,0.0008717595,0.0015285215,0.00926525,0.000055175195,0.00023835943,0.00075301813,0.000018032055,0.23342054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970912,0.00011144143,0.00026942464,0.00032284867,0.0000102475915,0.0000557995,0.0001333441,0.000007863271,0.0019978902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816775,0.0047969506,0.00070432137,0.0010993431,0.008511296,0.0032105139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9495629,0.023062298,0.008623148,0.0026023998,0.011209902,0.004939434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021620104,0.0002226784,0.0005028596,0.004665167,0.010965585,0.007717391,0.0028938872,0.0028952318,0.009160819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100274436,0.00039625852,0.000563768,0.003555047,0.025017582,0.0063417573,0.006378957,0.005440328,0.00052641385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003703635,0.0003156715,0.28559902,0.00011184671,0.00008052237,0.0002012279,0.12813751,0.00044830164,0.000389076,0.5468944,0.00818187,0.029270196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005835385,0.00009440887,0.71782506,0.0004638577,0.00009572619,0.00017046853,0.16890822,0.0022040657,0.0004936972,0.077611946,0.031905644,0.0001684809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77679527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9036276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22320473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03313909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05114363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44903845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211938116","doi":"","title":"Public Justice and the Anthropology of Law; Chapter 2; The Power of Persons Unknown","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Persuasion; Economic Justice; Politics; Appeal; Political science; Compassion; Publics; Sympathy; Public relations; Criticism; Power (physics); Action (physics); Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.014965924815278817,"score_gpt":0.28607065164531803,"score_spread":0.2711047268300392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211938116","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014261963,0.07742076,0.008402313,0.07164704,0.0014958779,0.00007785007,0.0001328237,0.0000676021,0.8264936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7570326,0.037755627,0.0051861843,0.015705552,0.003786287,0.00034102672,0.00012907777,0.00015235702,0.17991142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865025,0.00091577595,0.000016850228,0.0001232324,0.00018849569,0.000105426574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988549,0.000837524,0.00009454224,0.00008198704,0.00006106458,0.00006993154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001131689,0.00043988778,0.00028505473,0.0013585861,0.0054700035,0.006482496,0.0008118845,0.0039032954,0.007168094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015275766,0.00022871267,0.0002651466,0.0014396393,0.024810432,0.0055117146,0.002167795,0.0030585974,0.0008369261],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028438883,0.00001432766,0.000129924,0.000049944105,0.0000012397115,0.000052061987,0.0047718696,0.00005771878,0.000035589906,0.97681254,0.014004774,0.004067227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056157396,0.000015081995,0.00063189125,0.00047188133,0.0000049269333,0.00023293504,0.009233567,0.00022709124,0.00013760164,0.5142034,0.47482717,0.000008822775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035206124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00512518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007168094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030270016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021308204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023979604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3212606031","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0090.br","title":"Stephen P Garvey, <i>Guilty Acts, Guilty Minds</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.015146492737580225,"score_gpt":0.2425762131743265,"score_spread":0.22742972043674628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3212606031","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001243743,0.09898189,0.00036317733,0.83596146,0.031072658,0.000056504337,0.00040075756,0.0000659308,0.031853814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028728385,0.08203453,0.00058253465,0.73100275,0.03605641,0.0002806619,0.00030535428,0.00017753735,0.12083193],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956085,0.0014341417,0.00033744704,0.00056069664,0.0015629492,0.00049624563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98820776,0.00797242,0.0005559249,0.0003231761,0.0018685297,0.0010722652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004483506,0.0013401309,0.0008741449,0.0028651212,0.01140152,0.008250213,0.0036082577,0.028966665,0.009860689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020611528,0.0012874502,0.00060942315,0.002912163,0.009207495,0.0066198967,0.0033287958,0.015900241,0.0033569245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005425748,0.000006832883,0.00017769022,0.00006792818,0.000004581583,0.00005925722,0.00087106257,0.000018984376,0.00001812855,0.010929293,0.9846868,0.003153927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038640315,0.000018313665,0.0067260927,0.00088968175,0.000029658675,0.0002203912,0.0084058,0.00010310248,0.00018897517,0.020508856,0.9628126,0.00005783332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30638924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.581794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6936108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006899567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0115011595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6092117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214669509","doi":"","title":"De l’holographie en divertissement : quelle protection pour l’artiste-interprète ?","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science; Ethnology; Sociology","score_opus":0.014506499693123185,"score_gpt":0.25932927957908414,"score_spread":0.24482277988596096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214669509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023639664,0.0074513336,0.01767982,0.045716867,0.0025435216,0.000050762916,0.00012742508,0.00016554522,0.902625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60042757,0.0045148204,0.005545222,0.011225016,0.0014698856,0.00011447895,0.00009662221,0.00046721663,0.37613922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785703,0.0008173655,0.000060262748,0.00032719277,0.00058661454,0.00035156397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998489,0.00069091015,0.00012562038,0.00030010234,0.0002747614,0.00011962513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016594636,0.0005655745,0.0003592188,0.0008079538,0.005024317,0.0076865056,0.0009591568,0.0037168304,0.017676974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004849244,0.000304514,0.00038127447,0.00066392985,0.023713298,0.007348577,0.003027848,0.0058487626,0.0035444684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030893374,0.0000070281812,0.00019670639,0.000055034536,0.0000035645462,0.000106406886,0.031535473,0.00004583518,0.00044204673,0.9488065,0.0086467285,0.010123768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021187516,0.00004233821,0.0014078626,0.0003487113,0.000012278928,0.00040476013,0.024295535,0.00019965453,0.0015059516,0.14124031,0.83047795,0.000043360054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014278188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018366866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017676974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004304531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003196692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059135377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215007618","doi":"10.21125/iceri.2021.0951","title":"DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL PECULIARITIES OF JUDICIAL COMMUNICATION IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ICERI proceedings","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lingua franca; Political science; Linguistics; Politics; Reputation; Supreme court; Sociology; National language; Law","score_opus":0.02095160158376629,"score_gpt":0.3045042337280484,"score_spread":0.2835526321442821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215007618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9101514,0.0018928711,0.0005370874,0.010613818,0.00013200004,0.000056351822,0.0003941534,0.000028569071,0.076193675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673826,0.00038104109,0.00015729207,0.00030405505,0.000019295965,0.00001146188,0.000089358015,0.000012373147,0.0022869597],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920196,0.0024805665,0.0004142323,0.0008966906,0.0029233724,0.001265515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9677563,0.019700592,0.003155191,0.0006111433,0.006393111,0.0023836764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058781174,0.00038015025,0.0005638801,0.0056608636,0.023227159,0.012446641,0.0015336118,0.0025483065,0.0029440636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026541958,0.0003385667,0.00025089955,0.0067095687,0.011290869,0.0036674005,0.003876267,0.003364004,0.00022254299],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003637836,0.000022627033,0.008454355,0.00009851201,0.000010851714,0.0011643822,0.95673,0.000103638136,0.00091374153,0.023604255,0.0030937137,0.0057675773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004758846,0.000009130524,0.020377658,0.00031324284,0.000024231154,0.00015203195,0.91837406,0.00046368962,0.0004761524,0.001227833,0.058514707,0.000062540996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.896006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9123681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10399401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.103901155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.067395404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75385916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215192281","doi":"10.7202/1083866ar","title":"Droit et littérature, droit comme littérature ?","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Tangence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.03361456992325447,"score_gpt":0.3041774578013501,"score_spread":0.2705628878780956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215192281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034185663,0.041597106,0.011409695,0.07854968,0.00589092,0.00004775246,0.00024794106,0.00015608066,0.8279152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6147513,0.01666886,0.0042914217,0.0144005865,0.002302004,0.00012904301,0.00031225968,0.00054916996,0.3465954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607545,0.0021902667,0.00014140083,0.00053230993,0.00063340156,0.00042717147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971917,0.0011343913,0.0003161247,0.00051879167,0.00057168264,0.00026734016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022468506,0.00053268427,0.0004097217,0.0012026306,0.0067401235,0.012484055,0.0010612721,0.0027104926,0.0126575045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005845104,0.0003016131,0.00043762385,0.0013567338,0.0137460185,0.01245706,0.0039679483,0.00518685,0.0030487594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017033843,0.000012212377,0.00048626127,0.00009739942,0.0000050921144,0.00013851938,0.026196161,0.00006980146,0.00024249798,0.9335884,0.024374656,0.014771912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004067536,0.000018425115,0.0010254598,0.0004922771,0.0000061499604,0.00025555366,0.018377313,0.00013310323,0.000382305,0.069912374,0.9093758,0.000017208098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0154580735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018573195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0154580735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063494304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005711063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04606855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3215874459","doi":"10.1163/15718123-bja10094","title":"An Age-Old Question: Optical (A)llusions, (In)Decency, and (In)Justice in the Trial of Japanese War Criminals","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Criminal Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Accountability; Economic Justice; Law; Punishment (psychology); Sociology; Prejudice (legal term); Political science; Psychology; Criminology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06263862911530622,"score_gpt":0.4064782138919735,"score_spread":0.3438395847766673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3215874459","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27562988,0.42333895,0.00044190694,0.23011746,0.0026681067,0.00008321688,0.00006798541,0.000007969541,0.06764452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89102876,0.078180805,0.00027917084,0.022156978,0.0013705287,0.000045152203,0.000027759637,0.000013072782,0.0068977904],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899395,0.0073934244,0.0005496488,0.00026322383,0.0010119398,0.0008422055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98846114,0.004974979,0.0018172336,0.0002024057,0.0033917646,0.0011525814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013361225,0.00011283976,0.00041136995,0.0011754537,0.0031075354,0.003539914,0.0006607626,0.0024212685,0.002521268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029751971,0.00019600653,0.00019592095,0.0009995707,0.0061837845,0.0024463988,0.001024816,0.0023112746,0.00026208808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006356317,0.00068711233,0.064124234,0.0071407473,0.0002885435,0.0028134712,0.119054094,0.0005542859,0.0016771549,0.14667766,0.17696048,0.4793866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014031997,0.0010068364,0.20662498,0.009318449,0.0005859957,0.0012352491,0.20982638,0.00026561195,0.0011265241,0.02419735,0.5455124,0.00015989886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0697286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21869834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0697286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004139905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009786842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13864547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216115114","doi":"10.26443/glsars.v1i1.142","title":"Performing an Anti-Homeless City","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill GLSA Research Series","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"University of Victoria; Law Foundation of British Columbia; McGill University","keywords":"Real estate; Gentrification; Tourism; Performativity; Poverty; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Immigration; Social geography; Urban planning; Economic growth; Political science; Human geography; Law; Gender studies; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.150104267335251,"score_gpt":0.4344647692901795,"score_spread":0.2843605019549285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216115114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.249048,0.00056785025,0.0125024365,0.033555984,0.00049946853,0.00012966532,0.00006680113,0.00017884038,0.70345104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9427039,0.0001505362,0.0016248547,0.0020862962,0.00002491735,0.000031206237,0.00002530969,0.00004905284,0.053303853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99363434,0.0023877143,0.00013952053,0.0006342454,0.0010761523,0.0021280767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994829,0.00043316442,0.0006647798,0.0007917814,0.0012252047,0.0020560645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051787496,0.00046374265,0.0003736969,0.00072121323,0.02638117,0.008884568,0.0015577148,0.0023014916,0.0091880355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056778253,0.00033516763,0.00038059553,0.0005517924,0.04120943,0.0032067192,0.016080376,0.0041724844,0.0013799407],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030333538,0.00009323911,0.008823954,0.000079123914,0.00001915968,0.00040312018,0.17799526,0.00035823544,0.0012263323,0.7628747,0.019622497,0.028474042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028962604,0.00011858869,0.015112601,0.00029881063,0.000035309273,0.0004802489,0.15472916,0.00070182414,0.0019903874,0.06904609,0.7573799,0.00007806157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13778634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13778634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009320442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014839106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27396864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216258158","doi":"","title":"Creative Differences: Indigenous Artists and the Law at 20th Century Nation-Building Exhibitions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exhibition; Indigenous; Visual arts; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.016442287663880714,"score_gpt":0.2658875578290928,"score_spread":0.24944527016521206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216258158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7883063,0.0005331665,0.00035208545,0.0011666069,0.000027092807,0.000015359567,0.000015188008,0.000009797916,0.20957439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938939,0.000107646476,0.00009016683,0.00008819277,0.000010900156,0.000006281697,0.000005747793,0.0000050299986,0.005792076],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985008,0.0005512609,0.000037033595,0.00015369042,0.00027946042,0.00047770096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984541,0.0007522206,0.00027391693,0.00014791048,0.00010378635,0.00026811293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016379341,0.00019940698,0.00020067021,0.0019792807,0.009123715,0.0095371185,0.0011758634,0.0015199366,0.008655938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039126263,0.00016632846,0.00023328685,0.0012286309,0.020395502,0.0042811204,0.005239729,0.001686334,0.00030276345],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000488161,0.00017418529,0.01712895,0.00006936208,0.00001557904,0.0010021711,0.7389918,0.00023003029,0.000638063,0.21806735,0.0018107266,0.021822961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016570013,0.000061065584,0.07442987,0.00023490725,0.00001627207,0.0005000718,0.8288882,0.00038936568,0.0005435993,0.025358314,0.06953007,0.000031649306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017661192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057055898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017661192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004573091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015529157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03511679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216272443","doi":"","title":"Runaway Jurors: Independent Juror Research in the Internet Age","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Psychology; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Computer security; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.14504485947037277,"score_gpt":0.4386102378614654,"score_spread":0.29356537839109265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216272443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97260475,0.0024227537,0.00031885275,0.005018421,0.00014959014,0.0000735252,0.00011217565,0.000008311296,0.019291617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885649,0.0023314815,0.00028067103,0.0016144133,0.00023869633,0.00013734236,0.00009992814,0.000018326185,0.006714228],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98990214,0.006349617,0.0004768052,0.00067911734,0.001520595,0.0010716042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8790193,0.085000634,0.01158645,0.0058299517,0.011546718,0.007016886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019804297,0.00029245016,0.00077382947,0.0058198166,0.008929962,0.009192899,0.0015577616,0.003250295,0.020808639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11101425,0.00055784656,0.00033535797,0.0041248007,0.0058150426,0.011168096,0.0045918515,0.003992415,0.0019257179],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011289984,0.002721344,0.32971182,0.000607361,0.00017455219,0.0022070284,0.47229594,0.00012827048,0.00070877327,0.024596075,0.019824795,0.14589503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101126636,0.00055303203,0.27262047,0.0012358108,0.00014181976,0.0008527179,0.6825763,0.0003032308,0.00079495314,0.009854275,0.030855138,0.00011113252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009635276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024028206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020808639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002232507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005470206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10473639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216652799","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2019.4.5424","title":"Uneven Epithets","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Offensive; Epithet; Psychology; Linguistics; Focus (optics); Speech act; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.014746782388198352,"score_gpt":0.2725684331496375,"score_spread":0.25782165076143915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216652799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008079772,0.0011665781,0.007957076,0.009544098,0.0030869634,0.00004328287,0.0001950848,0.00018271914,0.9697444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35352877,0.0016826907,0.00501826,0.008031972,0.0023748192,0.00017672723,0.00046536565,0.0010482897,0.62767303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656963,0.0011203433,0.0001313982,0.0005765798,0.0011578277,0.00044423726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982393,0.0006627911,0.00015461323,0.0004113009,0.00036244185,0.00016956021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019041281,0.00083553325,0.0004331428,0.0017736717,0.006777868,0.00500241,0.0014703198,0.0022597858,0.062001687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005862336,0.00033116306,0.00028909885,0.002212766,0.0132427225,0.0063807946,0.0057755266,0.0045249616,0.015787465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044065055,0.000008059509,0.0003221545,0.00006943052,0.0000039340994,0.00022677743,0.011242276,0.000049234313,0.00027043134,0.91214687,0.054558784,0.021057917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005335774,0.000011303733,0.00034665392,0.00009625112,0.0000048560914,0.00022628324,0.0045693973,0.0001934468,0.0003179207,0.04440632,0.9498111,0.000011125185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032857256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007437357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062001687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024877305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013180645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2074163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32647112","doi":"10.1038/s41598-020-67976-6","title":"There is a Dream: On Writing, Fear, and Coming to Women's Studies","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thirdspace","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dream; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Coming out; Psychotherapist; Art; Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.045659417767619656,"score_gpt":0.3387850448873662,"score_spread":0.29312562711974655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W32647112","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014738962,0.020525137,0.00033617843,0.93674725,0.03306398,0.000008922538,0.000051489333,0.000046688514,0.0077465074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052035987,0.025093433,0.001233243,0.79860497,0.06091208,0.00007613396,0.00011062054,0.00031372017,0.06161986],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98834515,0.006302616,0.00055922894,0.0009930088,0.0023231136,0.0014769981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95343953,0.017951803,0.003037897,0.0035674279,0.008839014,0.013164392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020398822,0.0010641325,0.0020989818,0.0023835837,0.013381974,0.0143898,0.0018835964,0.0092597725,0.025059259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046600018,0.0004393788,0.0013117122,0.0022416445,0.0341247,0.020803008,0.008144233,0.01750695,0.009898423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007386282,0.00005534951,0.00260821,0.00028051226,0.000038912873,0.00048700208,0.028053293,0.000022965145,0.000281956,0.04986207,0.8524439,0.06579192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016457896,0.000048822785,0.000986907,0.0007856888,0.00001562242,0.00049726915,0.044669796,0.000015892576,0.00008351228,0.030209243,0.9226266,0.000044136155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066036806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008778333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025059259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040820693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010587129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10788059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W326595524","doi":"","title":"Bruce McDonald on the West Coast: The Love Crimes of Gillian Guess (Canada 2004)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cineaction!","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Drama; Comedy; Jury; Musical; Art; Favourite; Postmodernism; Art history; Sociology; Law; Visual arts; Literature; Political science","score_opus":0.014701356261489478,"score_gpt":0.24788432016323353,"score_spread":0.23318296390174406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W326595524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08051976,0.052410353,0.00037041464,0.42712292,0.008264145,0.00015927265,0.0013340785,0.0001797449,0.42963922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.257655,0.030229768,0.00054568425,0.056196958,0.0005858242,0.00008329246,0.00053068995,0.00023617934,0.6539366],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991786,0.00008161062,0.000012417312,0.000081669794,0.00026972516,0.00037599646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903774,0.000055392993,0.000032931377,0.000014719707,0.00035224052,0.0005069336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043397743,0.0006450216,0.0003601424,0.0009162439,0.03966377,0.0065402747,0.0013964343,0.0035933547,0.02235302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016363834,0.00047010393,0.00029850495,0.0016191832,0.0040163184,0.001862578,0.002396999,0.0057807676,0.0022731135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003395964,0.000039165217,0.0022063889,0.000117337826,0.00001389861,0.0011073138,0.042820558,0.000070051115,0.00033101454,0.008331663,0.918231,0.026697623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006314824,0.00001585262,0.006583578,0.00023129118,0.000012091327,0.00041555162,0.103161134,0.00002939301,0.00017325372,0.00048642853,0.8888451,0.000039900337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9890883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060437277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060437277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07204415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43850517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W334999147","doi":"","title":"Five Years of Canadian Feminist Legal Advocacy: Is it Still Possible to Make a Difference?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Intersectionality; Scholarship; Law; Legal profession; Politics; Legal pluralism; Legal education; Affirmative action; Reproductive justice; Legal realism; Policy advocacy; Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.011260941381368468,"score_gpt":0.2724428100908181,"score_spread":0.26118186870944965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W334999147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5549778,0.028359514,0.0008945873,0.2378074,0.0013947075,0.00012538524,0.0005262695,0.00007499129,0.17583941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729899,0.0040907166,0.0005725749,0.0077351662,0.00012592755,0.00003554793,0.00016831969,0.000021621034,0.014260224],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.983073,0.0014542119,0.00024405234,0.00067163183,0.009220897,0.0053362316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9763505,0.002505283,0.0018203228,0.00050296687,0.0105823465,0.008238581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010531649,0.00036913398,0.00049088104,0.0041137114,0.028507002,0.011247736,0.002469224,0.0032448142,0.0051639597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022476615,0.00027092616,0.0004284859,0.005596935,0.010008358,0.0041474095,0.004786464,0.0041375975,0.00027598656],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002852324,0.000350696,0.12576985,0.0006690314,0.00014067904,0.0011647757,0.23694281,0.00060381397,0.0014669538,0.17858034,0.11718397,0.3368418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024240228,0.00014908379,0.22155797,0.00073743827,0.00007094807,0.00021821399,0.17433445,0.00031033353,0.00062431715,0.0039274306,0.5979204,0.00012510503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.980163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99193597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15757395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15757395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23637784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9770948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W339244421","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v28i1.52351","title":"A Place for Subjectivity in Moral Judgments and Moral Actions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Moral disengagement; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral reasoning; Moral development; Moral psychology; Social psychology; Psychology; Epistemology; Moral authority; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06773411013792056,"score_gpt":0.39076975236205735,"score_spread":0.3230356422241368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W339244421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17314053,0.004294016,0.17198387,0.034152087,0.00103102,0.00017610434,0.00008836431,0.00017240708,0.6149616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864611,0.0004562935,0.0071457494,0.0008011664,0.00029331355,0.00009441339,0.000020985224,0.00006263812,0.004664264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9727049,0.01992347,0.0008138673,0.0020910325,0.0032543952,0.0012122887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9695556,0.020731827,0.0028057895,0.0031860992,0.002556828,0.0011637467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018645868,0.0007317282,0.00093322486,0.0029809903,0.0055948016,0.012134217,0.0015176913,0.0029475132,0.004996992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026754474,0.000497168,0.0008716729,0.0014518318,0.074404836,0.016557237,0.008931246,0.00631455,0.0005766307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027632237,0.000021929138,0.0010321588,0.000052242704,0.000012779692,0.0000778564,0.022308398,0.0001429425,0.0002875276,0.97015184,0.00024581086,0.0056387912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020572506,0.000051994037,0.0012857682,0.00012960972,0.000013023562,0.00010776889,0.007760178,0.0003766885,0.00040223158,0.9770758,0.01275058,0.00002587324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001575749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011367135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018645868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029971304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033241478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098609924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W350091559","doi":"","title":"Restorative Justice Classics: Most Influential Authors, Books and Essays","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Mennonite University","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Nomination; Economic Justice; Citation; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Social science; Library science; Law; Criminology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01123381689614777,"score_gpt":0.29312033717321034,"score_spread":0.28188652027706257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W350091559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3331412,0.24108845,0.0025857098,0.00987752,0.0069488315,0.00031028694,0.014874019,0.0007112045,0.3904628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7745127,0.13175192,0.013092748,0.0010725885,0.0073233214,0.00034471764,0.0077786883,0.0007703961,0.06335284],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99216706,0.00090957875,0.000739233,0.0005857395,0.005011856,0.0005866138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9673314,0.012961481,0.005710227,0.0012062439,0.010411883,0.0023787383],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040488713,0.0009019643,0.0011360277,0.08076086,0.004112669,0.01619186,0.00087681797,0.0008695596,0.012684444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032675713,0.00048226345,0.0005185854,0.095588826,0.0023040802,0.006864646,0.0028000574,0.0010132234,0.00616512],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043535946,0.00016079177,0.09068107,0.008996973,0.00042319982,0.0012587372,0.032107923,0.00035016876,0.0027438826,0.032634955,0.2156483,0.6145587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038037368,0.00010993543,0.13074616,0.0053096097,0.00044570924,0.0028780352,0.029376723,0.00042252624,0.0028291692,0.010521468,0.81717277,0.00014990538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017815551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006796115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91923916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027570482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043021874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04243368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W350342787","doi":"","title":"Television Discourse and Governmentality: Considering Da Vinci's Inquest and Da Vinci's City Hall as Citizen Projects","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cineaction!","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shot (pellet); Art history; Art; Governmentality; Lantern; Politics; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07427697494642349,"score_gpt":0.33051978733203125,"score_spread":0.25624281238560775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W350342787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19046322,0.01636836,0.0003759199,0.22500448,0.002800045,0.000050097704,0.00012344471,0.000038645405,0.56477576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90479785,0.0031781564,0.00012849408,0.015390512,0.001003041,0.000051774947,0.000039584644,0.00006669988,0.07534402],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953241,0.0025846486,0.000061767125,0.00030130395,0.0004560492,0.0012721241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956311,0.002550167,0.00029200772,0.00015617145,0.00021740109,0.0011531333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035903158,0.00041053907,0.0003926389,0.0014844001,0.037380416,0.028087556,0.0018361404,0.008190145,0.008772538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004446505,0.00050449726,0.00022328262,0.0021760778,0.030893095,0.0076890993,0.007873007,0.009449835,0.0005648892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023431803,0.000036848774,0.0010901198,0.00007342091,0.000004679282,0.00066990557,0.602699,0.000055858563,0.00017568172,0.3196822,0.06973563,0.0057532834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070198043,0.000012413832,0.0019633016,0.00020046569,0.000003776939,0.00012631847,0.46958932,0.000055370332,0.00010918252,0.0042132186,0.5237007,0.00001887076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12419993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23147887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12419993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026585804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058515943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24695402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35162743","doi":"10.29173/alr130","title":"Access Denied? Inconsistent Jurisprudence on the Open Court Principle and Media Access to Exhibits in Canadian Criminal Cases","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Political science; Majority opinion; Criminal court; Order (exchange); Interpretation (philosophy); Court of equity; Original jurisdiction; Sociology; International law; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.17221722814542753,"score_gpt":0.40462550162597194,"score_spread":0.2324082734805444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W35162743","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104730025,0.038477343,0.006120423,0.17574349,0.0010030058,0.00013866299,0.0003613339,0.000039643437,0.67338604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9574681,0.010927705,0.001464856,0.0170328,0.0005762789,0.000044199438,0.00009436293,0.000027532189,0.012364139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97641766,0.004683962,0.0010669501,0.0017090611,0.011044441,0.0050780056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9647248,0.020288473,0.0016855474,0.0010307878,0.0107387975,0.0015316868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0168366,0.00035431172,0.0008568803,0.006525531,0.019300323,0.01688612,0.004679299,0.0096029965,0.0034058655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04764219,0.00062181195,0.00059681863,0.0075242105,0.04170464,0.0063133175,0.0050137416,0.0086709885,0.0002018704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007174257,0.000007809329,0.0010049037,0.000055890414,0.000007789298,0.00025960678,0.0057314183,0.00021355302,0.00006428274,0.977527,0.0080439085,0.007076587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000065834756,0.000028981842,0.02397209,0.0021242965,0.00019260397,0.0005037617,0.029298741,0.0019788344,0.0004860477,0.5870456,0.35402754,0.00027559637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95705456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9696648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09168976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09168976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12757403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6652589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W352544215","doi":"","title":"Media Treatment of Hate as an Aggravating Circumstance for Sentencing: The Criminal Code Amendment and the Miloszewski Case","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian ethnic studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Newspaper; Criminology; Hate crime; Criminal code; Print media; Political science; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Criminal law; Humanities; Law; History; Art","score_opus":0.2827027551125245,"score_gpt":0.40601547059762,"score_spread":0.12331271548509548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W352544215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.727211,0.003291413,0.00078623265,0.024007719,0.00027609195,0.00008857826,0.000056324287,0.000020595544,0.24426207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947037,0.0006131958,0.000095829164,0.001303491,0.00011713789,0.000021208898,0.000008445768,0.0000031449324,0.003133921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960751,0.0017960778,0.00022813387,0.00021367705,0.0007952774,0.00089163845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902305,0.0057593565,0.0026039619,0.00052580924,0.0003865104,0.0004939178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025059422,0.00027161854,0.0002665066,0.003829963,0.0095474515,0.006285615,0.0009973162,0.0041399794,0.003229126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013633302,0.00036991516,0.0002708402,0.001973543,0.0097979065,0.002656875,0.0035296401,0.004328957,0.00031986495],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035285173,0.00047571858,0.051766574,0.00042567358,0.000080959966,0.06877343,0.16565815,0.0005888464,0.003245705,0.6338607,0.021209924,0.053561438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001290283,0.00035217384,0.17569275,0.0027785376,0.00042534256,0.05744883,0.35032,0.00235985,0.009865616,0.06780429,0.33246315,0.00036045807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018657254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03633157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98134273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003946355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002205347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037097335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W354769576","doi":"","title":"Culture and Adultery: The Novel, the Newspaper, and the Law 1857–1914 by Barbara Leckie (review)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adultery; Newspaper; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.005098283969458235,"score_gpt":0.207659837230504,"score_spread":0.20256155326104575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W354769576","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044712515,0.9690579,0.000020374791,0.024630835,0.0009986125,0.0000016222612,0.000024385154,0.0000018487092,0.0048172707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01302145,0.9603202,0.00006420347,0.01337526,0.005234361,0.00001166619,0.000037043126,0.000008281709,0.007927549],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990288,0.00042245153,0.000051328618,0.000104792394,0.00027583985,0.00011686936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696296,0.0017907846,0.000403302,0.0000706024,0.00048824184,0.00028415184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019973246,0.00059062877,0.00096236984,0.0029053465,0.0029906258,0.005804725,0.00077453064,0.004628914,0.005739045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056409435,0.00039659636,0.00029967292,0.004941447,0.009116354,0.0065057767,0.0022621115,0.0030494393,0.0012960414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072268886,0.000056368957,0.0012261639,0.0032871885,0.0000762616,0.00031578157,0.008103293,0.00014188816,0.00009132942,0.065519765,0.66883206,0.25227767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012604179,0.000016755203,0.004095396,0.0039363126,0.000029858467,0.00037107992,0.0028056565,0.000010076594,0.00004023356,0.003675829,0.98498535,0.000020911151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06001384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12466094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06001384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061439504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008180676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119329035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W372308125","doi":"","title":"Disorderly People: Law and the Politics of Exclusion in Ontario, edited by Joe Hermer and Janet Mosher","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of Social Policy / Revue canadienne de politique sociale","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.008726476735647401,"score_gpt":0.24972686662631596,"score_spread":0.24100038989066858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W372308125","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008105497,0.5495318,0.0007518676,0.35605067,0.0050026127,0.000070551505,0.0011818153,0.000035880836,0.07926928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16254894,0.6390559,0.0011574107,0.025855133,0.0047199414,0.00018063538,0.00063045847,0.00015720313,0.16569436],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966858,0.00063600973,0.00015400443,0.0002641275,0.0014985993,0.0007614323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647754,0.0010956915,0.0003351628,0.00014998007,0.001139096,0.0008026313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037377456,0.0011476775,0.0013203255,0.003197917,0.01765225,0.016035292,0.0029548907,0.006542745,0.00872119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006688937,0.0011350509,0.0006110892,0.013216018,0.024855819,0.0071254284,0.0043762056,0.004440839,0.00081610517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005929462,0.000036395675,0.0034830745,0.0012001253,0.000043058837,0.0002234789,0.050263964,0.0006013494,0.00017488278,0.23857504,0.6616529,0.04368634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015079152,0.0000050562517,0.010724635,0.0010466056,0.000031153977,0.00005271228,0.023543814,0.000121869845,0.000049704642,0.026259681,0.9381026,0.000047111855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9889949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99681526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.154184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.154184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24623789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98102665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W385022563","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511712043","title":"Poetic Justice and Legal Fictions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Poetics; Economic Justice; Poetry; Transcendence (philosophy); Law and literature; Variety (cybernetics); Reading (process); Jurisdiction; Law; Sociology; Literature; Aesthetics; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.016615272423464528,"score_gpt":0.23006299696575852,"score_spread":0.213447724542294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W385022563","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014227591,0.041173704,0.0036351497,0.051350623,0.0035123338,0.00003325214,0.000038041762,0.00006862207,0.8859607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75558895,0.024071328,0.0029636617,0.01321093,0.0051841247,0.00015398758,0.00009729119,0.00014348568,0.1985862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959567,0.0023462225,0.00010373607,0.0002739723,0.0010218689,0.0002973808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940211,0.004232733,0.00039590907,0.00042292225,0.00062484544,0.0003025243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029040347,0.0004998432,0.0005338582,0.0037090816,0.009956695,0.010694005,0.0011366182,0.0038146714,0.0067996634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014337832,0.00023631734,0.0002519255,0.0027397326,0.048572302,0.0076785707,0.0043963543,0.005584184,0.0011097611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027417213,0.000012569244,0.00003414141,0.000038264432,0.0000010068161,0.00009696364,0.007238925,0.000046717778,0.000021624808,0.9748512,0.011299113,0.0063568116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062406784,0.000011679811,0.00017861235,0.0003972418,0.0000028178533,0.00026155126,0.006402167,0.0001456392,0.000114698465,0.42262027,0.5698498,0.000009257573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016684319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021490974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010694005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006991351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038233467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050726056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W41371080","doi":"","title":"修復的司法の動向(2)ジョン・ブレイスウェイト「恥と刑事司法」 原文名: John Braithwaite, Shame and criminal justice, in: Canadian Journal of Criminology, July 2000, pp.281-298","year":2002,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"法律時報","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Shame; Criminology; Criminal justice; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05167236652852049,"score_gpt":0.278877036898254,"score_spread":0.22720467036973352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W41371080","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012255372,0.20627241,0.005289055,0.50075585,0.009108667,0.000068872636,0.0003059134,0.00005191085,0.26589188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4454668,0.16037974,0.005848819,0.122396804,0.016618658,0.00022166113,0.0002384109,0.00015478618,0.24867438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991341,0.00028526102,0.00004523193,0.00012660662,0.0002992602,0.00010949725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985537,0.00083596376,0.00019120416,0.00004262311,0.00029147507,0.000085033695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018825182,0.0005149296,0.00026117588,0.0011568635,0.0036408287,0.0057258066,0.0008015255,0.0062858234,0.009343939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038938702,0.00032067992,0.00026345527,0.0014158309,0.012221221,0.007950441,0.0016513806,0.004444099,0.002191884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048218895,0.00003632509,0.0021821877,0.00044869687,0.000018798164,0.0003127958,0.018489162,0.00015202913,0.00029437037,0.6246921,0.30371433,0.049610972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023856157,0.000027735556,0.0070810607,0.000752663,0.000035113997,0.0005152957,0.012843782,0.00022696666,0.0006558548,0.20816311,0.76962596,0.000048615573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03197347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0852493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03197347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029666827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003609309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06357473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200226049","doi":"10.22215/cjcr.v8i1.3333","title":"Images of Justice","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Children s Rights / Revue canadienne des droits des enfants","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Psychology; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.012093182914219442,"score_gpt":0.2379615683955276,"score_spread":0.22586838548130816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200226049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002021144,0.0016744595,0.00029299656,0.024935126,0.002029129,0.000011233816,0.00006878698,0.000035570964,0.9689316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16562654,0.0016710693,0.00040309178,0.016222486,0.0011550711,0.00004582891,0.00007902923,0.00013983433,0.81465703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830735,0.00051335373,0.000035983503,0.00017867325,0.0005517902,0.00041283315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999064,0.00017842863,0.00006918003,0.000096532094,0.000334726,0.00025706514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010643627,0.00041200142,0.00028985838,0.0011024489,0.012375972,0.010227038,0.0008127902,0.0033974678,0.049609408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003957149,0.00019340818,0.0002592707,0.00087800727,0.010509779,0.0045483997,0.0034380502,0.005130101,0.0068718116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012083423,0.000012314064,0.00016739008,0.000027622695,0.0000023297262,0.00014413957,0.0122283725,0.000017458004,0.00010334636,0.73098874,0.24358493,0.012711372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018628348,0.0000026004939,0.00020649732,0.000045356384,0.0000011262904,0.00007383456,0.006000361,0.000016173764,0.000043992408,0.015022185,0.97858125,0.0000048223933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08936017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17915085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9106398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009652651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007925203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17768008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200385528","doi":"10.32920/ifmj.v1i2.1518","title":"Crowdsourcing Documentary Making","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Interactive Film and Media Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Dissent; Miami; Political dissent; Crowdsourcing; Politics; Media studies; Social media; Commons; Political science; Making-of; Sociology; Law; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.01595618061153086,"score_gpt":0.32546393845063315,"score_spread":0.3095077578391023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200385528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010270013,0.003318362,0.10899582,0.027083121,0.009032992,0.0009976013,0.0032937522,0.003766876,0.8332415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2287143,0.0041505774,0.09863221,0.005560457,0.0053436123,0.001786502,0.005439694,0.00444649,0.6459262],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848717,0.0049299025,0.000788238,0.0021865994,0.0063649667,0.0008586479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96681553,0.013280166,0.0011223616,0.011480499,0.0055573354,0.0017441389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011723716,0.00089450314,0.0006138851,0.005056842,0.011040794,0.018059004,0.0034572147,0.0039079553,0.08003573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038148675,0.00053759373,0.0009603369,0.005603898,0.007269984,0.009928658,0.013643861,0.003069329,0.022789242],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109475084,0.00008136568,0.0005661249,0.000584673,0.000039303042,0.0006519582,0.014845554,0.0022604067,0.0024721746,0.290042,0.41267958,0.27566737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020722877,0.0000139128,0.00019919695,0.00019255877,0.0000059666,0.00008325928,0.0028918048,0.0011177763,0.0008893885,0.03323139,0.96132374,0.000030302688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009275463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016208597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08003573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004748029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054622344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2677462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200413074","doi":"10.1017/9781108779210.016","title":"Anti-tragic Justice:<i>The Measure</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Economic Justice; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Computer science; Law; Data mining","score_opus":0.03189845460731585,"score_gpt":0.23018051047727695,"score_spread":0.1982820558699611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200413074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002513649,0.009604708,0.0015748347,0.0643627,0.0024267582,0.000010852363,0.00004465588,0.00006361091,0.9193981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3913525,0.0067688334,0.0016092883,0.039301787,0.002829495,0.00007669478,0.00007558311,0.00028908308,0.5576968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985482,0.0005749059,0.00002912799,0.00010030998,0.00056310813,0.00018420942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989151,0.00044728912,0.0000865647,0.00013183664,0.00029230444,0.00012686082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013922501,0.00032285514,0.00023069428,0.0007507449,0.0038637049,0.006890522,0.0007189401,0.0024791532,0.010159622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004423451,0.00015738717,0.0001403117,0.0007423201,0.011190746,0.0043979078,0.0020158985,0.005541105,0.0025476618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037569189,0.0000067325122,0.00010452934,0.000028575096,0.0000019696688,0.000018229848,0.0020423173,0.000030120416,0.000046372137,0.8251654,0.15782392,0.014728229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003512833,0.000011601246,0.0008266042,0.0002875045,0.000004468041,0.00011418147,0.003780888,0.00012840082,0.00026213782,0.22117205,0.7733971,0.000011537848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076887384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023158379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010159622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028255794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031636127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033987284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200541146","doi":"10.29173/wclawr64","title":"Learning Across Borders: An Introduction to the 2021 Innocence Network Conference Scholarship Panel Articles","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Wrongful Conviction Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Innocence; Scholarship; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06715842054800629,"score_gpt":0.3603934741890681,"score_spread":0.2932350536410618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200541146","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00088534795,0.03499248,0.0033329523,0.6946821,0.05088535,0.00075852143,0.0007605568,0.00017056424,0.21353209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025207903,0.028612364,0.009152612,0.38526514,0.043307748,0.0029441048,0.0012436219,0.0005088694,0.50375754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9786775,0.0073391423,0.0013048097,0.001995017,0.008414372,0.0022690948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97617346,0.0121078035,0.0006597234,0.0009531125,0.0063780886,0.0037278836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031549525,0.0012025784,0.0010152681,0.0052795755,0.013757698,0.027042136,0.0051680673,0.03596799,0.04592123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038764942,0.0011180941,0.0016093618,0.0045606573,0.007893161,0.021726083,0.010188342,0.021856463,0.013470981],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009291028,0.00008160357,0.00018733763,0.00021586975,0.0000046339405,0.000048192138,0.0005433967,0.00010313592,0.00009516562,0.060236692,0.91210055,0.026374158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007986454,0.000018284944,0.0008817732,0.00066016195,0.0000043281157,0.000023281586,0.0007743688,0.00008442609,0.0000774846,0.015585529,0.9818419,0.000040443345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04436436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1489472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04592123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019697662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036776915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16685182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205465458","doi":"10.7202/1082957ar","title":"Editorial: It takes all of us to enforce the law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"First Peoples Child & Family Review An Interdisciplinary Journal Honouring the Voices Perspectives and Knowledges of First Peoples","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Human rights; Political science; Legal profession; Sociology","score_opus":0.01414147725558104,"score_gpt":0.3292034288887153,"score_spread":0.3150619516331343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205465458","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000036296744,0.0024810713,0.000049893988,0.024005065,0.9702516,0.00003357579,0.000049809176,0.00005940549,0.0030333127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005442035,0.0032917003,0.00007490049,0.018624896,0.9623049,0.00005095465,0.000045388777,0.000042715452,0.015020341],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99302685,0.0009833561,0.00068483426,0.0007234182,0.0041186986,0.00046291473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97915226,0.008478187,0.0012271642,0.00069693424,0.00754471,0.002900844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006777376,0.004100794,0.0038424728,0.0044918205,0.006932405,0.010185543,0.0042274743,0.01720709,0.02878584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032780048,0.001329974,0.0025549254,0.002141129,0.0038393454,0.005632025,0.001740736,0.018791309,0.023694726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012448226,0.000010955819,0.000017521998,0.00013061335,0.0000058629857,0.00006845657,0.000018471952,0.000012981466,0.000025433936,0.0001381217,0.9972036,0.002355649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003833436,0.000028940545,0.0003273146,0.0008395867,0.000027665237,0.00020011641,0.00012160116,0.00009796429,0.000077398705,0.0007237034,0.99749774,0.000019476069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040528094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009538181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02878584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004553891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052595423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09629828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205567495","doi":"10.22215/etd/2021-14632","title":"Normalism and Legal Representation in Canadian Art","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proposition; Reflexivity; Supreme court; Law; Representation (politics); Sociology; Aesthetics; Art; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.011334501233915101,"score_gpt":0.3160929521280427,"score_spread":0.3047584508941276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205567495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12833926,0.0023795117,0.0032612465,0.02830684,0.00026090903,0.00006653316,0.00013387707,0.000074192816,0.83717775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975721,0.0005824189,0.0007762328,0.0009541127,0.000041922587,0.000018728622,0.000045004173,0.000021068185,0.021839598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98820984,0.0014691942,0.00028873372,0.0010688467,0.004677582,0.004285752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99544597,0.0012031755,0.00039515164,0.00032980216,0.0018001668,0.0008257515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055080648,0.0004137734,0.000511653,0.003566023,0.03226421,0.016418602,0.0026453326,0.0030428676,0.008683527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012276802,0.00042358442,0.00057261396,0.004522501,0.05889197,0.0037120602,0.0077524735,0.0055285385,0.0003634804],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069526636,0.0000073478336,0.0007201231,0.000012969628,0.0000026666737,0.000077454024,0.011039545,0.00016476805,0.00005375372,0.98045725,0.0025300852,0.0049270256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005807924,0.000036383415,0.019812062,0.00037594757,0.00005127734,0.0002805917,0.06875763,0.0036813207,0.0004900516,0.51852506,0.38773003,0.00020167521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9824095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9804324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1605948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1605948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14843656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.973591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206224408","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83734-1_22","title":"He Said, She Said, We Watched: Video Evidence in Sexual Assault Trials","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Witness; Sexual assault; Identification (biology); Psychology; Supreme court; Criminology; Recall; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.16053533639336368,"score_gpt":0.36898546758753803,"score_spread":0.20845013119417435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206224408","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011376443,0.017916245,0.0014086032,0.75297797,0.01174099,0.00008327189,0.00020853174,0.00005545379,0.21447128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01973585,0.0200808,0.0018957187,0.4123831,0.005012727,0.0001988676,0.000121506564,0.00016546274,0.54040587],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792814,0.0009876679,0.00012422091,0.0001307166,0.0005838339,0.0002454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98822767,0.009856284,0.00014172737,0.00014246674,0.0011111523,0.00052076776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005452656,0.00042077815,0.0005720167,0.0011811593,0.0042642923,0.0065986463,0.0011726761,0.013606819,0.025044126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017415423,0.0004483609,0.00037066423,0.0008345975,0.003404086,0.010571237,0.0015465764,0.015405301,0.005090208],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020009886,0.000019761152,0.00019239438,0.00014015302,0.000005968362,0.0001895162,0.0016618604,0.000052713094,0.00008902917,0.053169437,0.89922863,0.045230467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013446302,0.000017096561,0.00032885277,0.0007530696,0.00001098803,0.0002700808,0.0019610815,0.00007830174,0.00019367263,0.01250106,0.98384696,0.000025244295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035243295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09189576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035243295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00437563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065804543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083780885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206503878","doi":"10.1017/9781108650151.010","title":"Practice, Practice, Practice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Data science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.020434786273066798,"score_gpt":0.3751301362602743,"score_spread":0.35469534998720753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206503878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016506149,0.007895277,0.005687001,0.34144902,0.004768607,0.0006687046,0.0006889946,0.00047839116,0.6367133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22691731,0.029552126,0.02892385,0.17462236,0.0064224824,0.0043587126,0.0018851431,0.0010984025,0.5262196],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96132696,0.023634234,0.0018008306,0.0021283256,0.008706159,0.0024034625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9390448,0.018212467,0.0026473713,0.006449185,0.019061586,0.014584585],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030274529,0.00060661056,0.0006145109,0.0020157115,0.005392096,0.017295824,0.0016187847,0.006121272,0.11291748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14399114,0.00043210207,0.00041243466,0.0029287962,0.008471779,0.01542146,0.0077715847,0.007136887,0.04933099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018700342,0.000068226975,0.00062737963,0.00067244744,0.0000041878748,0.00006075094,0.003499725,0.00006731163,0.00008710905,0.10168539,0.78198236,0.11122641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016394855,0.000032232056,0.0009442231,0.0023212936,0.00000344351,0.000104212,0.005147894,0.00008525448,0.000070206115,0.02676851,0.96449417,0.000012296676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010115613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010627007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8870825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012036319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05246689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37774664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206756492","doi":"10.1590/1809-43412021v18a701","title":"An Ethnographic and Humanistic View: Does the BC Human Rights Tribunal Hold Promise for Indigenous People?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vibrant Virtual Brazilian Anthropology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Indigenous; Human rights; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01538177318325696,"score_gpt":0.3287973293574747,"score_spread":0.31341555617421774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206756492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7832923,0.0025477316,0.0027119864,0.018680662,0.00018408289,0.00008853316,0.000068759065,0.000020939236,0.19240506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994823,0.0005150695,0.00027442173,0.0006596783,0.000029114406,0.000023102753,0.000007719643,0.0000059023278,0.0036620058],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472886,0.0039980127,0.000061939056,0.00021858761,0.00038544004,0.0006072927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947015,0.0036502047,0.0004033196,0.0003297366,0.00056112173,0.00035421754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005596611,0.000224139,0.00022814704,0.002547847,0.015794447,0.006790862,0.001220733,0.0011622594,0.0044334284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075534834,0.00022720796,0.0001035933,0.0021509707,0.03703518,0.003947917,0.003770173,0.001567029,0.0002052367],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007476311,0.000013656943,0.002271022,0.00005018183,0.000002086006,0.00032881703,0.9634973,0.000023893961,0.00017916234,0.029492024,0.00075416814,0.0033802534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.8772185e-7,0.000005240085,0.0016146458,0.0000990246,0.0000016271712,0.00012811058,0.9809831,0.000032938628,0.00008277264,0.002398083,0.014649823,0.0000038249777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19144244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24933118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80855757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009074607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053282185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38065624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210338542","doi":"10.1353/mdr.2010.0022","title":"The Gray Zone of Victims and Perpetrators in Peter Weiss's &lt;i&gt;The Investigation&lt;/i&gt;","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Drama","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gray (unit); Criminology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.00884811621931371,"score_gpt":0.23721213563651875,"score_spread":0.22836401941720502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210338542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49475694,0.0086992,0.00493904,0.19545968,0.001072633,0.000062876716,0.00017550241,0.00007350374,0.29476073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96930987,0.00080688763,0.00035910853,0.0047610216,0.00008578031,0.000036924343,0.000015689599,0.000054629483,0.024570169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794334,0.0010962008,0.00005152681,0.00015413448,0.00014564727,0.00060916215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981741,0.00095184986,0.0002807688,0.00012589182,0.0001365141,0.00033085712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018275194,0.00046383464,0.00033534341,0.0018430603,0.013899144,0.0065186224,0.00074054126,0.0028940893,0.0064223064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01033412,0.00044093482,0.0002152743,0.0016358022,0.02288036,0.006456595,0.009174272,0.004533591,0.00058728235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006831665,0.000024881885,0.002684714,0.00006865838,0.000006203806,0.00055531145,0.40061364,0.00009071554,0.00033411887,0.5424266,0.039687343,0.013439436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014329923,0.000040266335,0.008428169,0.00041865156,0.000018184282,0.0006838853,0.7035734,0.00015923458,0.0010451362,0.10067385,0.18491282,0.000032048123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022864833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036916323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022864833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028617678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026446658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045463443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210537758","doi":"10.1177/13624806211073696","title":"Gestalt contexture and contested motives: Understanding video evidence in the murder trial of Officer Michael Slager","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoretical Criminology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Circumstantial evidence; Officer; Scholarship; Situated; Sociology; Criminology; Power (physics); Law; Psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.15749237022363094,"score_gpt":0.3479979489750176,"score_spread":0.19050557875138668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210537758","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8115247,0.0028102954,0.017884735,0.015487416,0.00012556103,0.00007648093,0.0000818954,0.000043882545,0.15196504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99405825,0.00052224187,0.0024888273,0.00022980799,0.000022275572,0.000024926385,0.000023472872,0.000017931421,0.0026121808],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740064,0.0018608668,0.000068032765,0.00017258764,0.00031246967,0.00018546241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99162173,0.006383907,0.0009595606,0.000352725,0.00040057776,0.00028149167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032480732,0.00030529333,0.00025347178,0.0024447981,0.004616837,0.009463503,0.0012267202,0.0026062897,0.0033938466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018637266,0.00037963365,0.00019713689,0.0011326586,0.018611783,0.00968763,0.0055036074,0.0024653065,0.00027080558],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106977954,0.000047600057,0.0071223574,0.0001952304,0.000016090173,0.0025799077,0.7680412,0.00045353032,0.0016319182,0.18769222,0.0013019699,0.030811053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018593668,0.000111136615,0.021256031,0.0009080118,0.00003526393,0.0017252661,0.7573181,0.0027461296,0.0017090668,0.12949435,0.084585756,0.00009233595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0098653035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016804995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0098653035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026253986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014184695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01961577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211004355","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511498398","title":"Artistic Truth","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Hermeneutics; The arts; Interpretation (philosophy); Aesthetics; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Sociology; Common ground; Art; Philosophy; Visual arts","score_opus":0.01927770377879167,"score_gpt":0.22293864119502654,"score_spread":0.20366093741623487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211004355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008447019,0.01880436,0.003659093,0.01969384,0.0043092123,0.000026673019,0.000074602285,0.00009697568,0.95249057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14185832,0.022054162,0.00555163,0.01784658,0.0063928706,0.0001279074,0.00029042113,0.00030465014,0.80557346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994753,0.0015317831,0.0002923345,0.0005911921,0.0024417427,0.0003899011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951623,0.0022395109,0.00028057216,0.0012472295,0.00079980795,0.00027062275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035249186,0.00082805665,0.0006492798,0.0025406433,0.00542312,0.016904267,0.0014620591,0.004460327,0.030607408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010694081,0.00043909013,0.0005692195,0.0022925537,0.018652448,0.01391684,0.0057636527,0.0064021368,0.010030048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038885432,0.0000059801796,0.00003729971,0.000072713774,0.0000026369603,0.00003738935,0.0017554237,0.000054922057,0.000054406166,0.9378892,0.0452638,0.014822347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024776732,0.000006761981,0.000049949213,0.00025305586,0.0000020936113,0.000128212,0.0008342366,0.00007002428,0.00009197122,0.21320844,0.7853479,0.000004806889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012874005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016868928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030607408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042072013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00336328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10239196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211083980","doi":"10.2307/25606099","title":"The Life of the Law: Anthropological Projects","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anthropologica","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.06344749223663212,"score_gpt":0.3302461034351492,"score_spread":0.2667986111985171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211083980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054852996,0.15275227,0.020200772,0.2984875,0.003131008,0.00007676829,0.00014317222,0.00011900293,0.4702366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9322598,0.03528772,0.0051743574,0.009657435,0.0034627526,0.00010113736,0.00006304298,0.00010997312,0.013883768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944857,0.0046808803,0.00007803365,0.00021102022,0.00026121837,0.00028325123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99050224,0.0075187925,0.00038931018,0.0005751835,0.0004706664,0.00054380577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008391373,0.00075959717,0.00070304016,0.006587637,0.011381339,0.018018065,0.0016684748,0.005831009,0.005075655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008656192,0.0006381201,0.00036138727,0.005740691,0.09360224,0.020127943,0.0039034844,0.0066488367,0.00030857566],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066630723,0.0000355007,0.00016262515,0.00005093715,0.0000033783042,0.000043175,0.01567823,0.000120020486,0.000032284723,0.9747619,0.004414707,0.0046903826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010253038,0.000017103079,0.0004859497,0.00028426,0.00000570439,0.00010804995,0.034404173,0.00030000028,0.000058353042,0.83606184,0.12825418,0.000010193313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058351844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074317204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018018065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006092949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054298397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04437834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213020242","doi":"10.1080/02722011.2022.2028236","title":"Introduction: Representing In/Justice in Canadian Film","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Review of Canadian Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; University of Manitoba; University of Winnipeg","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.032316656402103586,"score_gpt":0.3439075119551657,"score_spread":0.31159085555306215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213020242","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016895451,0.26974562,0.00072346354,0.3861563,0.17433201,0.00020128289,0.009581693,0.00023302685,0.15733708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05108923,0.2898014,0.0022910659,0.29168904,0.102147505,0.0003816883,0.0066568065,0.00056758546,0.2553757],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810106,0.0002762655,0.00011505877,0.00026029657,0.0009361819,0.00031122268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912307,0.0021155295,0.00024436426,0.00017406461,0.005417729,0.0008176849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024029044,0.0011549944,0.0007864022,0.0066448604,0.007893769,0.008481954,0.0021765241,0.0055279983,0.051330265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009073043,0.00045221174,0.00062163745,0.012150043,0.004060016,0.0045271614,0.0017921304,0.0058082673,0.0062385416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048515744,0.0000038301596,0.000113801914,0.00038598373,0.0000021770977,0.000011556764,0.0004767288,0.000016287098,0.000027994469,0.0069945143,0.9843038,0.0076584574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048496454,0.0000036287988,0.002009715,0.0013093412,0.00001052725,0.000030599473,0.0013942551,0.000019451394,0.000040138788,0.0010188295,0.99414235,0.000016347163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.891815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93833596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10818499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03087524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046906695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22401655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213133143","doi":"10.1093/grurint/ikab105","title":"Fair Dealing in the Reproduction of Audiovisual Material for Political Criticism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GRUR International","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criticism; Reproduction; Politics; Aesthetics; Sociology; Multimedia; Political science; Computer science; Art; Law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.036482501923662244,"score_gpt":0.3767486312765021,"score_spread":0.34026612935283984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213133143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04672057,0.0014994006,0.004195477,0.03817076,0.000652784,0.00028654796,0.00015978055,0.00011670124,0.908198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8291798,0.0005817024,0.0019394085,0.008376176,0.0005219608,0.00021319716,0.00006355904,0.000070208735,0.1590539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96937704,0.0076926653,0.0006571516,0.0014111387,0.014140553,0.006721395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9718944,0.018999385,0.0008010684,0.0019864303,0.005265924,0.0010528031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015305081,0.000639228,0.00045635464,0.0029162518,0.02590395,0.020365547,0.004094724,0.017307108,0.016742513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05150981,0.00071625493,0.0006985961,0.0034477077,0.014820706,0.003821578,0.004855841,0.007636386,0.001205337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012044256,0.00007393529,0.0013540275,0.000083226434,0.000018560624,0.0006775528,0.014330065,0.00079801393,0.0009933471,0.86965585,0.08300802,0.028886916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002697817,0.00024316354,0.015405696,0.0009385967,0.00022972126,0.00060947123,0.029399706,0.0057678046,0.0062579773,0.1898674,0.75069815,0.0003125252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7528476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8543585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7528476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045413822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.060829274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4972158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213145946","doi":"10.4324/9780203428368","title":"Justice Fragmented","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.04160845939589133,"score_gpt":0.30631779068074727,"score_spread":0.26470933128485596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213145946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004711273,0.0025878109,0.005077838,0.017221885,0.0011451626,0.000066025554,0.00009107287,0.00007220518,0.9690268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34781376,0.0022329132,0.0020188221,0.019404044,0.0006732928,0.00014586878,0.00021689732,0.00023475742,0.6272597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99533856,0.0010401845,0.000139738,0.0008531477,0.0012784903,0.0013498521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981109,0.00038586743,0.00010274339,0.0003347382,0.0007183588,0.0003473587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024047066,0.00045274873,0.00059409224,0.0017836731,0.013175434,0.010647407,0.0017138036,0.0036285815,0.03184599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075008483,0.00029210825,0.00053801434,0.0016886161,0.013854545,0.0076783877,0.011196536,0.006814815,0.0043597114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008258401,0.0000087526505,0.00012929294,0.00002343725,0.0000049741893,0.00012682751,0.006595667,0.000059822178,0.000059128215,0.9447988,0.035058502,0.013126517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008779034,0.000011884004,0.00030002944,0.00019414394,0.000008095844,0.00021466649,0.006490449,0.00013959852,0.00008156723,0.2682986,0.72424155,0.000010675615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0329095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04719735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0329095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010899767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01087296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106535435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213229882","doi":"10.1080/13504630.2013.842672","title":"Face to face","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Identities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Queer; Contradiction; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Legislation; Homosexuality; Legislature; Politics; Character (mathematics); Gay rights; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.02072891003851643,"score_gpt":0.30555652268433847,"score_spread":0.284827612645822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213229882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011977563,0.0012291018,0.012005786,0.020054849,0.0035653107,0.0002117439,0.0013418513,0.0012643692,0.9483495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14225943,0.0011392785,0.0075602136,0.017069919,0.0014073728,0.00031167967,0.0017058208,0.0006192505,0.82792693],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973552,0.0005540526,0.00006864816,0.00044303073,0.00085979386,0.0007192923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969704,0.00044225837,0.0002757589,0.00047199268,0.0009163291,0.0009232492],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017637981,0.0007469271,0.0005520081,0.0007143836,0.007222865,0.005465466,0.0019948257,0.0032034547,0.3258695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009442122,0.00031545645,0.00059812324,0.0005060401,0.001844754,0.004837906,0.0078864535,0.0024497223,0.1590856],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014991123,0.0001273455,0.0028805775,0.00014833578,0.000019980844,0.0015692054,0.004302576,0.00030876894,0.0008792158,0.05417047,0.7500207,0.18542288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000106182915,0.00003861609,0.0010892247,0.00013736392,0.000007877986,0.0011328117,0.0039828243,0.00034338378,0.0002860225,0.010701542,0.982241,0.000028810624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020013718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029655695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3258695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026140148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039384216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9615653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213370135","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511997204","title":"Theatre and Testimony in Shakespeare's England","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Demonology; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Historiography; Literature; Period (music); History; Conviction; Art; Philosophy; Law; Aesthetics; Political science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02297744484630921,"score_gpt":0.21471069343418106,"score_spread":0.19173324858787186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213370135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033244148,0.07287874,0.0017049871,0.021603614,0.0049091596,0.000060990656,0.00017789514,0.00005836243,0.8653621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4253579,0.051430006,0.0013494692,0.008007157,0.0015500213,0.000105081075,0.00019794215,0.00009196943,0.5119105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775356,0.0013263429,0.00008811207,0.00009342985,0.0004857788,0.00025283213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975963,0.0019064021,0.000089411405,0.000099241515,0.00017627259,0.00013229974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016875153,0.00044656286,0.00039537763,0.001461881,0.008452218,0.006386248,0.00082192454,0.0032921734,0.009664948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051998356,0.00037136936,0.00017563485,0.0017519064,0.0086036995,0.0028781209,0.004105809,0.003741103,0.0018832396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061122184,0.00006043268,0.0003015905,0.00081203924,0.00001366888,0.0026618175,0.25680265,0.0002322539,0.0007578963,0.41799068,0.2450122,0.07529364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008219126,0.000026361022,0.00089551514,0.0010919537,0.000005351824,0.0007373398,0.04184187,0.00005549496,0.00035840235,0.010119631,0.94484067,0.000019086692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019913891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047921877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019913891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004414418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029172488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03959596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213415740","doi":"10.4102/aosis.2021.bk174.11","title":"Records as instruments of truth, justice and reconciliation – Disrupting colonialism in archival praxis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Commission; Norwegian; Political science; Economic Justice; Inclusion (mineral); Theme (computing); Sociology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.027860356355359765,"score_gpt":0.30745381498626734,"score_spread":0.27959345863090757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213415740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10580518,0.017879855,0.017532356,0.032119542,0.0010802059,0.00012617624,0.00020712517,0.00015862598,0.82509094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93112755,0.006039416,0.004627359,0.0008835891,0.00031206163,0.00007273791,0.00008499172,0.00014575475,0.056706604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883583,0.007777128,0.0005883349,0.0007656478,0.0018909994,0.0006196178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98171014,0.011630931,0.001152429,0.0035504894,0.0014635451,0.0004924832],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012133268,0.00035482566,0.0004503364,0.0048127957,0.013363589,0.02304936,0.0020910944,0.0024274637,0.00437433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021345785,0.00052281277,0.00022178741,0.0067754416,0.074135676,0.021228587,0.008580689,0.004532257,0.0006172533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009312225,0.000005434011,0.00029225543,0.000064422784,0.0000026880382,0.00009272511,0.14554898,0.00007051659,0.000074173935,0.8362586,0.002445283,0.015135574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013157318,0.000026830181,0.0015111204,0.001169486,0.000019097251,0.00046208606,0.17355004,0.0004472281,0.0007956843,0.29150265,0.5304515,0.000051238465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04312354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05712169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9866364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014056687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011016033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10198891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220879292","doi":"10.1007/s11196-022-09885-7","title":"COVID Masks as Semiotic Expressions of Hate","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"St. Thomas University","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Semiotics; Aesthetics; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Masking (illustration); Sociology; History; Media studies; Visual arts; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.0329636870661727,"score_gpt":0.3459313580366637,"score_spread":0.312967670970491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220879292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08405381,0.0017996508,0.0888256,0.01032378,0.00064603874,0.00008949324,0.00015902823,0.00020234734,0.8139002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96323276,0.000285312,0.006947723,0.00041941548,0.00013314837,0.00008226152,0.00005902178,0.00015704805,0.028683327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944126,0.0034688318,0.00021081403,0.0005470523,0.00083482644,0.00052596786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932387,0.003939374,0.0006444972,0.0012309714,0.00065736857,0.00028908925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040197303,0.0007318712,0.0004438355,0.0018340712,0.0070729116,0.009459763,0.001211228,0.0038492226,0.00808789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01265751,0.00062514824,0.0004523797,0.0016890373,0.04131582,0.01120247,0.006521773,0.0046660015,0.00091891433],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012136653,0.0000030626682,0.00008899139,0.00001530137,0.0000017505612,0.000063914966,0.027430441,0.00005229419,0.0002489623,0.9703738,0.0005297901,0.0011795388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003887456,0.00005566909,0.00087861245,0.00020769006,0.000027333363,0.00069400965,0.05327446,0.0014216821,0.0015914668,0.77389354,0.16786394,0.000052773084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005566725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005996381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009459763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032018088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020500391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027056754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223956308","doi":"10.29173/psur269","title":"No House, No Vote","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Political Science Undergraduate Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Scholarship; Legislation; Elite; Law; Political science; Democracy; Possession (linguistics); Law and economics; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03354686321825944,"score_gpt":0.3414865648769228,"score_spread":0.30793970165866336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223956308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005192441,0.011119279,0.0009871788,0.040684454,0.0041022506,0.00008575583,0.0022626333,0.000107501204,0.9354586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29372552,0.017538412,0.0017160383,0.041093815,0.0015695117,0.00015981097,0.0019975046,0.00016552402,0.6420339],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957948,0.0006163422,0.000099894285,0.0004799464,0.0020368826,0.0009720737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972638,0.0003242939,0.0001437638,0.00028477833,0.0014042114,0.000579171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018192234,0.00037095038,0.0005411431,0.0013547202,0.0071151606,0.004762519,0.0010377439,0.0017748972,0.055710554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008421359,0.00023073563,0.0002739342,0.0017923162,0.00666446,0.002529998,0.0019195088,0.0024271,0.008543232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052245334,0.000018725364,0.0018479326,0.00037290316,0.000017784754,0.00007324184,0.0016178184,0.00010038238,0.00016405339,0.4250166,0.47238642,0.09833186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000789647,0.000008410464,0.001633833,0.00016796724,0.000009201637,0.000033513414,0.00074428995,0.000017907878,0.00005901858,0.005393642,0.9919165,0.000007906153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6626739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8622846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6626739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012359291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026999667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67862535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224253370","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192844545.003.0005","title":"Election Fraud and Adjudication: UK Law and Beyond","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Wrongdoing; Adjudication; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Law; Law and economics; Disinformation; Context (archaeology); Sociology","score_opus":0.012187015824153625,"score_gpt":0.2515819202847023,"score_spread":0.23939490446054865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224253370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016428825,0.10085788,0.0024368803,0.095215864,0.0028382556,0.000059958198,0.00019438131,0.00007657472,0.78189135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37898895,0.0434987,0.0019815322,0.040120505,0.002784907,0.00014555731,0.00018967014,0.00013894422,0.5321512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99411124,0.0024701431,0.00036423636,0.0005252161,0.0017535392,0.00077548914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917561,0.005526142,0.00042867192,0.00055617583,0.0013655501,0.0003674179],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004529709,0.00024294012,0.00048781387,0.0019110544,0.004479245,0.012531726,0.0011278656,0.008320054,0.014783671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011791832,0.0004960409,0.0003175548,0.0023772109,0.009492982,0.005543715,0.0035879912,0.0064563556,0.0028464226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019100955,0.000014923185,0.00028307957,0.0001435786,0.0000025625545,0.0002759109,0.004984384,0.00023293773,0.00012599373,0.8778468,0.08547909,0.030591616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007966616,0.000015348356,0.0013013316,0.0006755698,0.0000036356137,0.0001246909,0.0007836072,0.00022752372,0.000077723955,0.038645156,0.9581177,0.000019625753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0828035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09411467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0828035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018186355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0084289955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16464305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224261897","doi":"10.4324/9781003128441-2","title":"My Journey With Meditative Inquiry","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.05982086322996052,"score_gpt":0.3202384902547644,"score_spread":0.2604176270248039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224261897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022279361,0.075760566,0.022810046,0.34331074,0.007864979,0.00010584474,0.000085439664,0.00018703968,0.5275959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60716707,0.073263764,0.03189122,0.084638044,0.011595579,0.0006072541,0.00014898612,0.0004054241,0.19028269],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966067,0.002428439,0.000062428764,0.00021746516,0.00049265806,0.00019230953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99441564,0.004203206,0.00018151622,0.00034211326,0.00034304927,0.0005144564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004714808,0.0005485629,0.00045402432,0.0009936591,0.0077760466,0.009108014,0.0016126451,0.0029677278,0.0063229753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062895413,0.0002968385,0.0003069361,0.0010220829,0.029335944,0.0134801045,0.0051740916,0.014348753,0.0017600985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012754237,0.000055565863,0.00011762341,0.00010280568,0.000003230098,0.0001287403,0.07015842,0.00006524166,0.00017181874,0.87324154,0.0340626,0.021879613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007498758,0.00003237353,0.00013324522,0.00045985854,0.000002346043,0.0003449503,0.028769268,0.0001817925,0.00029392066,0.22507308,0.7446889,0.000012726025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014738819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022427335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009108014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004082312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024274106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029619336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225603624","doi":"10.22215/etd/2022-14911","title":"Truth, Lies and 'Deepfakes': The Epistemology of Photographic Depictions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Context (archaeology); Perception; Variety (cybernetics); Epistemology; Overconfidence effect; Realism; Psychology; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Cognitive science; Politics; History; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.011933707466401638,"score_gpt":0.2994349922772784,"score_spread":0.2875012848108767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225603624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09832055,0.023402281,0.14210245,0.09193823,0.0014022761,0.00007879138,0.00024086352,0.00014771018,0.6423668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795098,0.0028907622,0.009586048,0.0013857718,0.00038374556,0.000052040614,0.00005851898,0.000069972426,0.0060633235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950119,0.0038283842,0.00014834711,0.00036165616,0.00048935105,0.00016028053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99032754,0.0069723167,0.0006217043,0.0011648855,0.00066776405,0.00024586925],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00606828,0.00040700432,0.00044218014,0.0038785993,0.004922277,0.01126831,0.0013206633,0.0039427974,0.0034899889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016392834,0.00051620585,0.00046316482,0.0016465472,0.058825046,0.018620046,0.004021334,0.005211392,0.0005042641],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007850289,0.0000036047654,0.00013059442,0.000033456236,0.0000032840767,0.00004536119,0.01133654,0.0001416296,0.00006117115,0.984486,0.00078112836,0.0029693209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055380124,0.00000515153,0.00013864573,0.00014384121,0.000003696352,0.0000930858,0.0059180395,0.0006160029,0.00012406228,0.9731356,0.019809105,0.0000073656634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028715366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022227913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003912134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013421656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03209251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229673390","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19413","title":"Caesars Entertainment Operating Co. (Re) <i>[2015] O.J. No. 1201; 2015 ONSC 712 (Ontario Superior Court of Justice, January 30, 2015)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entertainment; Economic Justice; Download; Law; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03101750018826518,"score_gpt":0.3015964477350956,"score_spread":0.27057894754683043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229673390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011736815,0.0011818787,0.00029087055,0.0061422572,0.00058271305,0.000082083796,0.0020520429,0.00032364673,0.98817086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056314045,0.00057520467,0.00019636337,0.0027452933,0.000081589424,0.00004015522,0.0006163308,0.000111402376,0.9900023],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988722,0.00004676933,0.000038554044,0.00010098323,0.0006885949,0.00025281718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895203,0.00013941637,0.000047879887,0.000056172827,0.00069679215,0.000107724605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006680848,0.00055391045,0.0002376108,0.0016483456,0.005998805,0.005126552,0.0011815329,0.0033277532,0.19255298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002413276,0.00070225575,0.0004890882,0.0012108802,0.0010323692,0.0017443076,0.0012120942,0.0031826363,0.0826993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015369265,0.000011398052,0.00031227118,0.00005394963,0.0000025398535,0.00005822241,0.00013606361,0.00003504752,0.00018438554,0.022673832,0.9674091,0.009107865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005340342,0.000004980818,0.0015703775,0.000067321904,0.0000047128037,0.000026414546,0.00018113354,0.00007181663,0.00022308913,0.0005339222,0.99729985,0.000010951642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5556493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79267997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44435072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069109756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010609609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8939352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229831014","doi":"10.4324/9781315407340","title":"Women Leading Justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.03369362348111766,"score_gpt":0.31051243224109626,"score_spread":0.2768188087599786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229831014","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059512525,0.0076977112,0.0003325294,0.007097222,0.0043631596,0.000032342192,0.00011061077,0.0001447878,0.9796265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004109318,0.0023735007,0.0002048194,0.0022967907,0.00033084766,0.000020376021,0.00006380215,0.000075411524,0.9905252],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919444,0.00013273097,0.000022519282,0.00012729458,0.00028801957,0.00023500949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995697,0.000056832538,0.000022154043,0.00003891071,0.00015400334,0.00015837696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004145727,0.00061733444,0.00030013296,0.00089511526,0.006889736,0.006971559,0.00073587854,0.0020494119,0.13824676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011938665,0.000268564,0.000295147,0.0010002371,0.00135547,0.0031813206,0.003646453,0.003072738,0.06033481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063614502,0.00001799485,0.00017510948,0.00007934341,0.0000015574751,0.000114695125,0.002998517,0.000019923802,0.00011795083,0.081667885,0.8387708,0.07602992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.5151535e-7,0.0000017359863,0.00006772246,0.00005331091,3.64254e-7,0.00003195656,0.0004936791,0.0000028613333,0.000014130755,0.0009067285,0.9984261,9.74311e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076953336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033995055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13824676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002921303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044743572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4624815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229855480","doi":"10.1515/9780822387046-016","title":"The Colonial Archive on Trial: Possession, Dispossession, and History in Delgamuukw v. British Columbia","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Colonialism; History; Genealogy; Ancient history; Art; Archaeology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020286114513016634,"score_gpt":0.25897938872541143,"score_spread":0.2386932742123948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229855480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060329203,0.011461192,0.00025283682,0.02417554,0.00026739907,0.000028579581,0.0001813839,0.000015142819,0.9032888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72943217,0.005808004,0.00011393539,0.0030555315,0.000107036176,0.000033377906,0.00006916478,0.000040125782,0.2613406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989685,0.0002495448,0.00002973804,0.000068456444,0.00027695528,0.00040679792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982145,0.0009556732,0.00009013145,0.00009599971,0.00041522706,0.00022866049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009033091,0.0001966156,0.0002963394,0.0011596163,0.016969187,0.008205579,0.0010010059,0.0021448296,0.01070568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041413284,0.0002943063,0.00008670991,0.00284108,0.013292768,0.0024723501,0.0027229735,0.003882523,0.000565691],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035493005,0.000024517012,0.0031863842,0.00009864652,0.0000055881887,0.0008966809,0.08791638,0.00017716015,0.0001430862,0.74692184,0.120960355,0.03963392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013688001,0.000012661747,0.011003382,0.00093003124,0.000021366832,0.0003335215,0.08201879,0.00021168118,0.00030139118,0.050975434,0.8541234,0.000054591572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.924018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9759833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075981975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040405687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04198302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29316515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230044696","doi":"10.3138/utlj.020415r","title":"BOOK REVIEW","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Boilerplate text; Legislation; Legislature; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Art","score_opus":0.019827583048009672,"score_gpt":0.2606447722653794,"score_spread":0.24081718921736975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230044696","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023275372,0.43236455,0.0011877897,0.056890924,0.07750231,0.00012262535,0.0016082292,0.00045881805,0.42963198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019861965,0.23864374,0.0010013034,0.032821912,0.0251017,0.000114351016,0.0014861104,0.00023607459,0.6986087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988727,0.00012097463,0.00005639492,0.00013295146,0.00073025184,0.00008664023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961294,0.00080576236,0.00017795253,0.00018749326,0.0022558868,0.00044348618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009782354,0.0005573624,0.0008884485,0.0032423246,0.0012912061,0.004653369,0.0019097815,0.003044442,0.21323338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075114374,0.00036937514,0.0004768685,0.0038455764,0.0009226069,0.0032878,0.0015401681,0.002968563,0.18681787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023398386,0.000003960261,0.000014026907,0.00010886908,0.0000011142404,0.000013745937,0.00001565322,0.000013227725,0.000017027682,0.0012363808,0.96684664,0.031726964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014267921,0.0000020170485,0.000047593745,0.00020239218,0.0000011678937,0.000038624497,0.00001816161,0.000003478944,0.000007277871,0.00030237212,0.99937385,0.0000017647285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009986333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022893528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21323338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026155654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050952667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7133367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230624291","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14644557.v1","title":"The Remasculation Film: Themes and Variations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Centre for Social Innovation; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Masculinity; Archetype; HERO; Narrative; Rhetoric; Appropriation; Literature; Aesthetics; Victory; Sociology; Art; Gender studies; Philosophy; Law; Epistemology; Linguistics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.02260859099794328,"score_gpt":0.3012167181841545,"score_spread":0.27860812718621125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230624291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70587915,0.0149531895,0.0045733023,0.011368585,0.0011556825,0.00026747506,0.0006374675,0.00016252311,0.2610026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658604,0.006068362,0.0018508623,0.0008545032,0.00048355575,0.00025022373,0.00037652516,0.0002841882,0.023971329],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997761,0.0010307097,0.00009316576,0.00031538194,0.0005751628,0.00022456814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985114,0.0008699648,0.00011704278,0.00011320032,0.00020612922,0.00018232192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023664762,0.0004384623,0.00032395928,0.002875738,0.0065317424,0.007649594,0.0010714603,0.0010485941,0.002602685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006252392,0.00034491942,0.00020623225,0.0038133617,0.005940976,0.0040054433,0.0049665156,0.00258948,0.00030266566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014104527,0.0000783029,0.006137034,0.00040089918,0.000022655611,0.0013954024,0.80466187,0.00008719822,0.0034899304,0.10390044,0.014942966,0.06474231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023117258,0.00009234628,0.035375226,0.0009032269,0.000027881999,0.0022199512,0.565465,0.00035054254,0.0016250279,0.012738549,0.38111478,0.00006433082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059535066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0086930925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007649594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003604858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010090326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026155233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230840024","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.4.01","title":"Errors of Fact and Law: Race, Space, and Hockey in <i>Christie v York</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Dissent; Law; Economic Justice; Space (punctuation); Race (biology); Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Gender studies; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011768011800210797,"score_gpt":0.23144332909019,"score_spread":0.2196753172899792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230840024","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30280408,0.009805287,0.0017021423,0.24688874,0.0011887284,0.00004364467,0.00017505749,0.00003811231,0.43735427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97347236,0.0013815023,0.00016967411,0.0048849573,0.00012496018,0.000012144919,0.000020216963,0.000026784966,0.01990738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957969,0.0012614458,0.00012406726,0.00039770603,0.00086764485,0.0015522931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941835,0.0029478217,0.00079330587,0.00026870813,0.0007339151,0.0010726209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003498056,0.00024664827,0.00044891002,0.0014143842,0.031266216,0.017404867,0.0019639723,0.0051763332,0.00445854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013760378,0.00046680245,0.0002122892,0.0017208823,0.061696533,0.0072432067,0.006668145,0.007806491,0.0002598374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018154922,0.000011753871,0.0037069607,0.000033401437,0.000007649527,0.00092347414,0.20421991,0.00024369931,0.00004954051,0.7562403,0.02794554,0.006599634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002867372,0.000025278468,0.015749056,0.0007255068,0.000059869664,0.00071406196,0.43505657,0.0006096982,0.00050185225,0.10230213,0.44404554,0.0001817754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90215635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92873013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09784365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057686448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050813444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41854644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231138718","doi":"10.5749/minnesota/9780816679645.003.0005","title":"Seeing Red","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Minnesota Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.02632349077008329,"score_gpt":0.21427590785651357,"score_spread":0.1879524170864303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231138718","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045202413,0.0009058831,0.0010161861,0.011134448,0.0030491326,0.00001627408,0.00013927082,0.00022275606,0.983064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008775849,0.00068519416,0.00044255643,0.004052131,0.000311217,0.000013380599,0.00007861335,0.00025053468,0.98539054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994006,0.00015121151,0.000011753459,0.00012295439,0.00018826638,0.00012521488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994097,0.00013062282,0.00002297421,0.00009988224,0.0002206051,0.00011613337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071802706,0.000387326,0.00024691227,0.0005882927,0.0055004014,0.0056722364,0.00080146285,0.0021706645,0.34614554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019310418,0.00023994638,0.00039096817,0.0005124999,0.0018455312,0.0048781782,0.0029235194,0.004396081,0.13324231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014604392,0.000009131284,0.00006828409,0.000045157787,0.0000016512141,0.00009070793,0.002080328,0.000026854617,0.00014583537,0.15306039,0.81014717,0.034309946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.094944e-7,0.0000016568662,0.0000353192,0.00003400533,6.3442343e-7,0.000026266483,0.0006140769,0.00000792465,0.000044454464,0.0025814984,0.99665123,0.000001989476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015377885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028915934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34614554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026022717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020638627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231675697","doi":"10.3138/ecf.22.4.573","title":"Manley's “Feigned Scene”: The Fictions of Law at Westminster Hall","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eighteenth-Century Fiction","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Performative utterance; Representation (politics); Literature; Government (linguistics); Adventure; History; Philosophy; Art; Aesthetics; Political science; Art history","score_opus":0.013537532787329047,"score_gpt":0.26400443178007543,"score_spread":0.2504668989927464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231675697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14531879,0.017336007,0.0025277003,0.13710505,0.004109253,0.000053644824,0.0001624257,0.00021471705,0.69317245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78186345,0.003273118,0.00064754,0.007311217,0.0006808593,0.000027610798,0.00003332945,0.0001280168,0.20603491],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916935,0.0004953117,0.00001101061,0.000054794247,0.00014901924,0.00012066219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919266,0.00050791545,0.00006581586,0.000036186455,0.000077390454,0.000119998724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006005435,0.00035483445,0.0001786528,0.0009980486,0.009862634,0.0053737583,0.00073453644,0.0017356912,0.0075700013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031534648,0.0002270689,0.00012300572,0.00059710024,0.009985828,0.0026774334,0.0018071024,0.003968489,0.0007557192],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051868832,0.000042796746,0.0006430983,0.0000995204,0.000007038782,0.002136038,0.33323917,0.00015065927,0.00069612835,0.31117764,0.32390416,0.027851949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040215205,0.000020692125,0.0009179676,0.0001581174,0.0000036882966,0.00042488409,0.061685383,0.00008417548,0.0006792821,0.006014945,0.92999256,0.00001432845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028280443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07753588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028280443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060979286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013753532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056231678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231710155","doi":"10.32920/14637024","title":"Absence of Evidence and Evidence of Absence","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics","score_opus":0.13301819022945055,"score_gpt":0.3834404612571342,"score_spread":0.25042227102768366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231710155","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07986623,0.010960264,0.13978925,0.390881,0.0044097803,0.0002906583,0.0015639993,0.0002695307,0.37196934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9499066,0.0018714713,0.01728316,0.020127526,0.002373283,0.0003055622,0.0002814998,0.00007324029,0.0077777645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9498115,0.023686877,0.0041035763,0.0102442615,0.009723262,0.0024304679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7286504,0.21606039,0.013906733,0.023052655,0.014175113,0.00415475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04163216,0.0007661164,0.002302623,0.004978385,0.0047161817,0.010383458,0.0051005394,0.013544324,0.013904949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21413217,0.0010849006,0.001676323,0.002638317,0.06496185,0.029078785,0.011247811,0.013101688,0.0014838002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008406522,0.0000254083,0.0018565088,0.0003169455,0.00006634612,0.0005246473,0.0010499111,0.00021642538,0.00015272191,0.9861129,0.004562551,0.0050316285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005668947,0.000024186837,0.00064274814,0.0002656355,0.00003249354,0.0003276062,0.0006337918,0.00068179343,0.00041801392,0.9822182,0.014665758,0.00003311417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014084646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010397448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04163216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033170353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032089301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22017455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231911731","doi":"10.7202/042424ar","title":"Patrimony","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.008480772533734417,"score_gpt":0.2438904661309684,"score_spread":0.235409693597234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231911731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005112363,0.0032613152,0.005230453,0.013308418,0.0015761218,0.00004643568,0.00013643781,0.000119381024,0.9712091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26608366,0.0044701137,0.0029005564,0.008774246,0.0013096057,0.00013558076,0.00026865583,0.00033541012,0.7157222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937406,0.002030724,0.00027477043,0.0011468985,0.001960609,0.0008464719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635625,0.00092214555,0.0003816998,0.0008414371,0.0011041564,0.00039432658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026481422,0.0007613204,0.00049522455,0.0018961655,0.008021459,0.009689346,0.001613075,0.0033788069,0.044186015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00907779,0.00038552904,0.0004665298,0.0025093,0.016322762,0.007416537,0.0065337783,0.0051098615,0.012586981],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001496145,0.0000051869897,0.00026829087,0.000059963542,0.0000036925471,0.00012691546,0.007347283,0.00004856857,0.000103152524,0.9262588,0.04527235,0.020490909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003139102,0.000009483879,0.00041806768,0.00015962771,0.0000040121017,0.00014817469,0.0019019267,0.00007435486,0.00012590495,0.033514276,0.9636314,0.000009621247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025576197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025275767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044186015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008170993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007382115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231979502","doi":"10.29173/agora12405","title":"American Media","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Agora Political Science Undergraduate Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fourth Estate; Mandate; Government (linguistics); Supreme court; State (computer science); Political science; Power (physics); Media relations; Estate; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Media studies; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.050629892414061975,"score_gpt":0.3234286374825772,"score_spread":0.27279874506851526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231979502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038559884,0.005671997,0.00031171183,0.008159695,0.0024805116,0.00001481922,0.0003972855,0.00007039029,0.9790375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.106802434,0.021354148,0.0007192384,0.011868159,0.005323525,0.00007249507,0.0010956116,0.00013758274,0.8526268],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993586,0.00009874264,0.000024291196,0.00008882799,0.00030046972,0.00012903252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989667,0.0002739572,0.00011691739,0.00010182944,0.00035825884,0.00018235062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007185185,0.00033525965,0.00013737795,0.002925584,0.0038317863,0.0060993545,0.00043444117,0.0014135427,0.06334893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002328571,0.00011633426,0.0001749232,0.0031396882,0.0010459791,0.0037009248,0.001740233,0.0016404259,0.01828072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030899566,0.000045769142,0.0012852174,0.00014287037,0.0000035797575,0.00022113955,0.0032068288,0.000044062162,0.00040344603,0.380917,0.47011057,0.14358859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.1278903e-7,0.0000029985308,0.00054374133,0.000039910734,9.020385e-7,0.000041025083,0.000408352,0.000008580728,0.000063460226,0.0012665649,0.9976216,0.0000022372064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005202263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010179099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06334893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017409531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013489204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21192324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232245778","doi":"10.12745/et.19.1.2903","title":"James Knowles. &lt;i&gt;Politics and Political Culture in the Court Masque&lt;/i&gt;. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. Pp vii, 288.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Early Theatre","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.010189362798181969,"score_gpt":0.2631622320525793,"score_spread":0.2529728692543974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232245778","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006380767,0.8329904,0.00042391985,0.049026307,0.0024312583,0.000011349975,0.00018031773,0.000036275298,0.11426214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04676081,0.5668032,0.0007633344,0.016155437,0.00330474,0.00006525475,0.00025695318,0.00021038976,0.36567986],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988512,0.00042468111,0.000057771802,0.00014518524,0.00038526513,0.00013583348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991881,0.00042573613,0.00010174677,0.000039133876,0.00015473999,0.000090541034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008688511,0.0009947489,0.0005422087,0.0020537768,0.002577923,0.004440537,0.0010495445,0.0036657997,0.03041242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028870075,0.0006951894,0.0002869274,0.002966096,0.0041213585,0.007988928,0.0016133792,0.003108513,0.009459517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002046764,0.0000114708755,0.00016257622,0.0006477424,0.000007471847,0.00009503348,0.0040446003,0.00007623901,0.00012725474,0.07185572,0.8673289,0.055622615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020087468,0.0000044071703,0.0005998604,0.000662047,0.0000024660292,0.00007445191,0.0012788975,0.0000138095575,0.00006895184,0.010125335,0.9871587,0.000009116311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061441127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15716659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061441127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006698731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004286085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12216699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232398604","doi":"10.1017/9781108989817.022","title":"Post Moore’s Law Computing","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Huawei Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Internet privacy; Computer security; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02162888802200187,"score_gpt":0.22343679845603956,"score_spread":0.20180791043403767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232398604","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036438255,0.006564568,0.002531436,0.017970126,0.0028267587,0.000029235585,0.00048019108,0.00059635413,0.96863693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003642172,0.0026277788,0.00043561295,0.001686219,0.000400809,0.000017644596,0.0001369699,0.00023555133,0.9908173],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935824,0.00008409918,0.000025247831,0.00012771894,0.00033657643,0.00006816096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992175,0.00023702448,0.000030402125,0.0001677354,0.00026405073,0.00008323246],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005277822,0.0005884646,0.00048459746,0.0011714342,0.0024037596,0.006358441,0.00067022344,0.0020008772,0.3465346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033331967,0.00042966407,0.00030835954,0.0017306736,0.0021356887,0.006826205,0.0018387737,0.0037992676,0.17105606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008046078,0.0000066797197,0.000048945836,0.00005736352,0.0000020379807,0.000041926563,0.00017940886,0.000060975046,0.00010680767,0.1264908,0.8202126,0.052784428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.107368e-7,0.0000021830485,0.000054391763,0.00003456833,4.777891e-7,0.00002378472,0.000036609235,0.000046977566,0.00006931144,0.008641396,0.9910869,0.0000025198462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006852495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011751443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3465346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027525078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016447728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9320891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232671323","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.2.135","title":"THE ASSOCIATION OF STATE AND INDIGENOUS LAW: A CASE STUDY IN ‘LEGAL ASSOCIATION’","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Normative; State (computer science); Association (psychology); Political science; Legal research; Legal realism; Legal pluralism; Associative property; Empirical legal studies; Epistemology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006247602781100124,"score_gpt":0.23525494792052445,"score_spread":0.22900734513942433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232671323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92011255,0.00063703174,0.001981265,0.007791419,0.000076294695,0.00010600512,0.000014583359,0.000015000309,0.069265805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99254805,0.00048078186,0.0012180887,0.000435392,0.000032631706,0.00005217332,0.000006749582,0.000006043389,0.0052200574],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99122626,0.005686259,0.0002205945,0.00045525224,0.0012220169,0.0011895342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923127,0.005040208,0.00083088083,0.0004619801,0.0005021676,0.0008520598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00776713,0.0002782094,0.0004832259,0.0015514931,0.030161837,0.0045208414,0.001854141,0.0052338615,0.0024789022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01256619,0.0005425528,0.0005095753,0.003050141,0.017187838,0.0049160914,0.0076948716,0.0056571043,0.00016614585],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019566669,0.00020342499,0.013295353,0.00007972948,0.000012545714,0.023993807,0.8091465,0.00027375,0.0004489861,0.14132394,0.001701478,0.009500804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017271379,0.00015228288,0.023350522,0.00022731385,0.000050059152,0.020508468,0.85693544,0.0018837372,0.0005934564,0.016110234,0.0801084,0.000062888495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15495896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30728152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15495896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010130043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008276137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.308114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232714723","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-9902-0132","title":"criminal-prosecutions-for-hiv-nondisclosure-two-cases-before-the-supreme-court-of-canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Human Rights Documents online","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Criminology; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Psychology; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.025592036052857432,"score_gpt":0.3377031131059831,"score_spread":0.3121110770531257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232714723","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049753994,0.00011168181,0.000034785528,0.00013956115,0.000044976856,0.00003249261,0.99811614,0.0003256699,0.0006972107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014835735,0.00010881473,0.00029434974,0.00008521774,0.000021969392,0.00009235472,0.996669,0.00007405088,0.0011707381],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862003,0.00018665181,0.00013661287,0.00029203703,0.00033345597,0.00043119685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994358,0.0012309509,0.0007023995,0.0012899075,0.0016070497,0.00081172714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013946574,0.0036495915,0.0016715506,0.0062638326,0.002722704,0.0036907375,0.0049340106,0.003838811,0.05405567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010354446,0.0011909425,0.0028329527,0.0072702183,0.0012581,0.0016327929,0.0030155028,0.0029980538,0.043418575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011978335,0.000046321784,0.0032226404,0.00054351083,0.00006145981,0.0000447622,0.00005155789,0.00055818923,0.000053148724,0.00049740117,0.9927228,0.002078339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018491674,0.000049602757,0.025766306,0.0014721063,0.00020435738,0.00020820044,0.00047827454,0.0038355596,0.00078047323,0.002460043,0.96277857,0.00011729158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61767393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82535046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38232607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074761324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015319491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7691553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233983534","doi":"10.1353/ctr.0.0029","title":"Courting Truth: A Meditation on Lawyer Shows, the Public Expectation of Lawyers, and Techniques of Persuasion in an Episodic World","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meditation; Persuasion; Aesthetics; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Art; Sociology; Law; Art history; Philosophy; Political science; Social psychology; Theology","score_opus":0.028987175867059754,"score_gpt":0.3163453676346753,"score_spread":0.28735819176761557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233983534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38548046,0.049616776,0.0043801824,0.14278431,0.004122358,0.000110429886,0.00015071861,0.000098683035,0.41325608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9524354,0.010585668,0.0010110035,0.008234084,0.0008791306,0.000034088745,0.00003201291,0.000067191875,0.02672142],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809057,0.0012719852,0.00002096729,0.00012361474,0.00027110992,0.00022173017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963321,0.0028679722,0.00020990288,0.00015131201,0.00025764332,0.00018117172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002514589,0.0005129718,0.00024014345,0.0011591524,0.007974207,0.0058744843,0.0010827035,0.002317577,0.0020060523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006379093,0.0001980516,0.00024032555,0.0008059776,0.022086507,0.0026678373,0.001727503,0.005934303,0.00025505773],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013240267,0.000094201634,0.00078725273,0.0002786355,0.00003151558,0.00040299186,0.76802194,0.00013017665,0.002125635,0.15157974,0.047507115,0.028908534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004601884,0.00010993916,0.009551135,0.00066461775,0.000033955763,0.00041760606,0.46454963,0.0002642525,0.0015334297,0.017284036,0.50550205,0.00004335803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15462486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30393723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8453751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009577719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004253589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3074497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234299750","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14644557","title":"The Remasculation Film: Themes and Variations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Centre for Social Innovation; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Masculinity; Archetype; HERO; Narrative; Rhetoric; Appropriation; Aesthetics; Literature; Victory; Sociology; Art; Gender studies; Philosophy; Law; Linguistics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.02260859099794328,"score_gpt":0.3012167181841545,"score_spread":0.27860812718621125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234299750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70587915,0.0149531895,0.0045733023,0.011368585,0.0011556825,0.00026747506,0.0006374675,0.00016252311,0.2610026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658604,0.006068362,0.0018508623,0.0008545032,0.00048355575,0.00025022373,0.00037652516,0.0002841882,0.023971329],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997761,0.0010307097,0.00009316576,0.00031538194,0.0005751628,0.00022456814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985114,0.0008699648,0.00011704278,0.00011320032,0.00020612922,0.00018232192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023664762,0.0004384623,0.00032395928,0.002875738,0.0065317424,0.007649594,0.0010714603,0.0010485941,0.002602685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006252392,0.00034491942,0.00020623225,0.0038133617,0.005940976,0.0040054433,0.0049665156,0.00258948,0.00030266566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014104527,0.0000783029,0.006137034,0.00040089918,0.000022655611,0.0013954024,0.80466187,0.00008719822,0.0034899304,0.10390044,0.014942966,0.06474231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023117258,0.00009234628,0.035375226,0.0009032269,0.000027881999,0.0022199512,0.565465,0.00035054254,0.0016250279,0.012738549,0.38111478,0.00006433082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059535066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0086930925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007649594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003604858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010090326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026155233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234313636","doi":"10.21083/csieci.v9i1.2381","title":"Joel Bakan","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Improvisation / Études critiques en improvisation","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Vision; Conversation; Interview; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Work (physics); Psychology; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Art; Engineering; Anthropology; Visual arts","score_opus":0.07256802254642629,"score_gpt":0.4265704845582597,"score_spread":0.3540024620118334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234313636","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009983192,0.044421032,0.0015748935,0.5772251,0.010818521,0.000054984353,0.00016530984,0.00014145325,0.3556155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14908406,0.021562805,0.0015512912,0.13560258,0.0011032409,0.000121149686,0.000112070564,0.00022621827,0.6906366],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998481,0.00047645392,0.00003789112,0.00024115111,0.0005519933,0.00021152821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754983,0.00082978845,0.00014242425,0.00006109191,0.0008749531,0.0005417852],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011908925,0.00026460414,0.0002098913,0.0006767104,0.008183636,0.0044541587,0.00068301463,0.0018057672,0.024163797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007082794,0.00023808339,0.00010146609,0.0005267338,0.0030307136,0.003453353,0.001384287,0.004497517,0.0075001847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001714356,0.00002142506,0.000301727,0.000065085675,0.000001689719,0.00011845776,0.0067183385,0.000032143627,0.0002809089,0.039195113,0.926297,0.026950955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016156229,0.00000470433,0.0004005856,0.00008880026,8.36707e-7,0.00015604802,0.006065906,0.0000339372,0.00011868563,0.002381964,0.99073887,0.000008018377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036022443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054081682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9758362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038004734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005872728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234624669","doi":"10.1353/ctr.0.0026","title":"(Un)Related Purposes: Theatre and Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Boss; Representation (politics); Raising (metalworking); Adaptation (eye); Aesthetics; Art; Law; Sociology; Visual arts; History; Political science; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.010082682028267282,"score_gpt":0.2566479324821099,"score_spread":0.2465652504538426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234624669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012831356,0.052317217,0.00079486147,0.023262165,0.0048317686,0.00003135187,0.00014772906,0.000061002662,0.9172708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15450767,0.04713406,0.0008220371,0.021586653,0.0072327987,0.00014512599,0.00026475583,0.0001723915,0.76813436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983677,0.0005800009,0.0000555288,0.0001334714,0.00054592954,0.00031735498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874,0.0003659897,0.00010341191,0.0001889383,0.00045004004,0.0001515964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010515167,0.00035826772,0.00028768723,0.0012811158,0.0055786185,0.0063451813,0.0008271612,0.003113201,0.042160723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004755922,0.0001348533,0.00021274269,0.0022563923,0.005896634,0.0029702897,0.001572439,0.00265921,0.007003928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021950844,0.000011455908,0.00012004159,0.00023221434,0.0000025910392,0.00009594751,0.0035190068,0.00006554592,0.0002331541,0.5035426,0.44512844,0.04702711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019865547,0.0000044973194,0.00033152776,0.00018420666,0.0000013750494,0.000049827453,0.0009606655,0.000021703949,0.00006684688,0.005438795,0.99293536,0.0000031298052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25132447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27660656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25132447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010765417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007308428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4997232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234632769","doi":"10.4324/9780203412046","title":"Law's Desire","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Sociology; Art; Psychology","score_opus":0.02860285441602185,"score_gpt":0.278376720259159,"score_spread":0.24977386584313716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234632769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012622726,0.0024392465,0.0011580889,0.0121389255,0.00045481246,0.000013716979,0.000037980713,0.000031511387,0.9824635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17250185,0.004893958,0.0010104509,0.01474719,0.0007936658,0.000080544756,0.00008019441,0.00011704395,0.8057751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998497,0.00036974787,0.00004137429,0.00025575294,0.0005940369,0.00024199934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903935,0.00047982423,0.00004827961,0.00012369167,0.00019961213,0.000109275825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016911196,0.00033385563,0.00039056924,0.00070236315,0.004229396,0.007964447,0.0005792243,0.0025614738,0.019087076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038728444,0.00026549824,0.0003028931,0.0005908109,0.01328851,0.0062122717,0.0030720297,0.0049302853,0.0042733974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017571454,0.00000435279,0.000034532437,0.000008350931,7.4656026e-7,0.000027215603,0.002760724,0.00001657885,0.00004007155,0.9604429,0.031036703,0.0056260624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031704233,0.0000061826977,0.000106792155,0.000082046165,0.000001497075,0.000102573365,0.0015394255,0.0000430256,0.000065584,0.12468859,0.87335545,0.0000056225963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008984664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013070324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019087076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036982745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004747031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06385261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234955257","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_101920","title":"Image and Maintenance and Crime","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Computer security; Psychology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.01375276090646633,"score_gpt":0.2564502539793097,"score_spread":0.24269749307284338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234955257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005000316,0.0155159375,0.001306373,0.0065828846,0.00036980273,0.00001410621,0.000024584711,0.000014074015,0.97117203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23471467,0.018210065,0.0013070204,0.0019573732,0.00072917744,0.00006300361,0.00006390721,0.00006383059,0.74289095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997795,0.00007291982,0.0000049795167,0.000028159893,0.000082206425,0.000032224292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998166,0.00008255683,0.000021742955,0.000024122337,0.000035012945,0.000020056257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003132474,0.00039305384,0.00021161119,0.00084047,0.0018735148,0.003832613,0.0005985176,0.0016481526,0.021649985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010177371,0.00014049298,0.00011937572,0.0009194652,0.008029287,0.002690189,0.0010046331,0.0020093648,0.0020763553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030331585,0.000018088314,0.00012987407,0.000021635895,0.0000010850536,0.000022673294,0.0018357811,0.000040988038,0.000030525473,0.93530977,0.027062567,0.03552406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003934075,0.000010690425,0.0015676585,0.00030937546,0.00000413479,0.00019503965,0.0036575743,0.00020674807,0.00015297526,0.5246164,0.46926695,0.000008476386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006503249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011718434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021649985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020502654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016012731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07242644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235194979","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511782152","title":"Is Eating People Wrong?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01777414096954253,"score_gpt":0.23095429612411855,"score_spread":0.21318015515457603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235194979","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027609117,0.03446505,0.0019596138,0.49700543,0.008287045,0.000045116507,0.0001625368,0.00009011748,0.43037593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45989206,0.020991081,0.0015203845,0.26128748,0.0028779441,0.00010988585,0.00020624533,0.00012513064,0.25298986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972608,0.0011139404,0.00009699319,0.0003147459,0.0005844157,0.0006290547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788123,0.0011318435,0.00024405259,0.0001708679,0.00026150557,0.00031048805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036923424,0.00043085846,0.0005503826,0.0006935608,0.010059745,0.0074402196,0.00091080513,0.0069888057,0.012040199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009298273,0.00030689457,0.00042707616,0.00082194916,0.031267315,0.00994319,0.0037283925,0.0076131,0.0029462075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044608143,0.000050095583,0.0034810374,0.00012459725,0.00003023887,0.0023404502,0.06730844,0.00004523226,0.00012908902,0.53329635,0.32580757,0.0673422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011087668,0.000031073458,0.0020093636,0.00083077536,0.000020678352,0.002239576,0.080234215,0.000060969905,0.0001495126,0.20169432,0.71269435,0.000023938926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010767285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015894491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012040199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028609612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038306818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040278494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235549593","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14664618","title":"Exploring the language of death with dignity: a comparative and critical content analysis of Canadian news editorials","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Dignity; Newspaper; Death with dignity; Assisted suicide; Content analysis; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Law; History; Social science","score_opus":0.269844477680784,"score_gpt":0.3715652808885003,"score_spread":0.10172080320771631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235549593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87109214,0.009207298,0.0010049349,0.015038364,0.0008175999,0.00049797393,0.00080795353,0.00004655057,0.10148719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894795,0.0033475042,0.00094499247,0.0014130765,0.00026394293,0.00022156321,0.00028124728,0.000064508284,0.0039835293],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.962318,0.014885266,0.0017147573,0.0018789348,0.015677134,0.0035258534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75961447,0.1508817,0.02006128,0.0026355998,0.061897602,0.004909378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030956142,0.0008027618,0.0009803192,0.03330519,0.025481127,0.020829864,0.0024387504,0.0023693172,0.0030628315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13708977,0.00064028276,0.00045353232,0.03202476,0.019856844,0.0064270217,0.005320236,0.0030617162,0.00024917882],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060750914,0.000018430472,0.004454241,0.0005541886,0.000015482377,0.00043818066,0.97779363,0.000025359648,0.00031923043,0.0064577744,0.0023377493,0.007525007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009486329,0.000021428641,0.021569472,0.0010938429,0.000040979437,0.000099260375,0.9231022,0.00009984949,0.00023985242,0.0006394431,0.053041544,0.000042662945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7395234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80433667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2604766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1275074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09153395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9251353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235635077","doi":"10.3138/jcs.49.1.251","title":"Courting Understanding","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; History; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.3363611822861621,"score_gpt":0.38497897441861334,"score_spread":0.048617792132451265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235635077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040038475,0.0021745604,0.0027557567,0.051196504,0.0010571807,0.00004877731,0.00022746259,0.00005899984,0.93847674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51191956,0.003691366,0.0038207036,0.033569477,0.0010785474,0.00019584822,0.00041683723,0.00027551418,0.4450321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98521847,0.0030697773,0.00047363638,0.0020976067,0.0055626896,0.003577799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99075973,0.0026543892,0.00031534894,0.0015713086,0.0038542761,0.0008448992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008583331,0.000957996,0.0013308376,0.0033339397,0.031247228,0.02884569,0.004350219,0.013676126,0.049998984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023369595,0.00060896185,0.0011232161,0.0038961268,0.035617113,0.011275224,0.007527359,0.015422801,0.0037887425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002298044,0.0000035974601,0.00003895865,0.000009067435,0.0000016504209,0.000025276668,0.002506026,0.00003187965,0.000013239751,0.97722423,0.018522035,0.0016217785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011332583,0.0000046345185,0.00037555984,0.0002412857,0.000015672096,0.000054238975,0.00991542,0.00021142385,0.00011560746,0.42963094,0.55939484,0.00002910186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7355172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70340526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2644828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06405495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10677415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53208077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235686877","doi":"10.21428/cb6ab371.2c3b597e","title":"Droits et voix - Rights and Voices: La criminologie a l'Universite d'Ottawa - Criminology at the University of Ottawa","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"CrimRxiv","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.05482285905420574,"score_gpt":0.2810490532022394,"score_spread":0.22622619414803363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235686877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22685625,0.15449952,0.0028047513,0.29027352,0.00250189,0.00010348582,0.0021379546,0.00015492948,0.32066768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8862284,0.023710383,0.0010988773,0.001531349,0.000326922,0.000048038954,0.00017638826,0.00010830672,0.086771354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99489355,0.0017137051,0.00020866642,0.0005266377,0.0009863535,0.0016710794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930582,0.0033260013,0.00057293114,0.0004904072,0.000967401,0.0015850259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00332411,0.00083256484,0.00079943275,0.0030558042,0.01909088,0.024723614,0.0017122559,0.005692313,0.020265074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008831,0.0010365784,0.00039989757,0.0052680615,0.027219439,0.010992794,0.0048934403,0.006429744,0.0010540893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012563611,0.00005430706,0.009699189,0.00039426138,0.000041395204,0.0005274718,0.107809134,0.00062749145,0.0004079786,0.7724894,0.053710323,0.054113295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036157526,0.000044976154,0.046106152,0.0015363173,0.00007530573,0.00048679727,0.19610333,0.0008929521,0.0014596538,0.07554079,0.67747223,0.0002453991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93587303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9609447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90752697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09247306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06850785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6709422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236117529","doi":"10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_104549","title":"Widowerhood","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.017854369504396925,"score_gpt":0.2618803967197515,"score_spread":0.24402602721535457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236117529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004309261,0.002615325,0.001084524,0.0049079144,0.0010930484,0.000030983465,0.00003008963,0.000017107268,0.9859118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059727393,0.001920414,0.00035592113,0.0030473557,0.00023337181,0.000044616103,0.000028673827,0.000022143051,0.9346201],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955887,0.00014196747,0.000009707842,0.00005044267,0.00008081259,0.00015831772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999848,0.000033658296,0.000009441687,0.00001681515,0.000033771536,0.00005840103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062494096,0.00040090657,0.00026081805,0.00055827264,0.0070295134,0.004009008,0.0006366947,0.0017217319,0.044998616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095764146,0.00017832468,0.00016653887,0.0005147976,0.0041303947,0.0028408896,0.0038121808,0.0033909692,0.007855533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012182888,0.000037394002,0.00029143642,0.000031904634,0.0000015439251,0.00016595743,0.011001879,0.00002682456,0.00008724251,0.82428885,0.10830371,0.0557511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002699477,0.00001150528,0.00030269058,0.00015197699,0.00000195921,0.00011501501,0.007249321,0.000025556636,0.00008891182,0.03681804,0.9552283,0.000003954506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005992315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01933157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044998616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015381295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025937497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15053535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236192624","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9780748697748.003.0008","title":"Translating Part of France’s Legal Heritage: Aubry and Rau on the Patrimoine","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Genius; Old French; Legal translation; Style (visual arts); Civil servants; Civil law (Civil law); French; Law; Sociology; History; Political science; Humanities; Literature; Art; Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.03780134187182502,"score_gpt":0.23774797329100922,"score_spread":0.1999466314191842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236192624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06899609,0.09512123,0.004741125,0.089235306,0.0046496224,0.000035259465,0.0001469562,0.00018980092,0.73688465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7321417,0.026395462,0.0023673463,0.008180468,0.0017800324,0.000032368866,0.00010423031,0.000215666,0.22878276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846834,0.0008688026,0.000025576644,0.00012008946,0.00034446543,0.00017273633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992867,0.0004257079,0.000039879178,0.000040574498,0.00015806087,0.00004899071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015871252,0.00058283337,0.00031332058,0.0016313329,0.005965976,0.005520098,0.00037197807,0.001702682,0.005360435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028406517,0.00017086366,0.00028384844,0.0012199241,0.007601105,0.0025968184,0.0011623374,0.0023640841,0.00084537355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033040702,0.000029749126,0.0005745283,0.00012202737,0.000008952067,0.0005162273,0.10814677,0.0002896927,0.00042396362,0.7231622,0.09278061,0.07391232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054258635,0.000025860869,0.0010849177,0.000236719,0.0000043796063,0.00021596493,0.011788474,0.00015106602,0.0003166264,0.014839699,0.97131795,0.000012906454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.105808906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10845126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.105808906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01271578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053005344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2103861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236644833","doi":"10.4000/communication.5283","title":"Denis BARRELET et Stéphane WERLY (2011), Droit de la communication, 2e édition","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Communication","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03212415805074531,"score_gpt":0.3318053529367513,"score_spread":0.299681194886006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236644833","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031011603,0.6647114,0.0053136176,0.086641714,0.019414965,0.000043019718,0.0008969273,0.00021922328,0.21965791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0674931,0.47599486,0.0054785255,0.017326953,0.010081707,0.00019469448,0.0010917862,0.00051086413,0.4218275],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910104,0.0002404461,0.000058205605,0.00012745614,0.0003904523,0.000082442995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864846,0.000797521,0.00012571283,0.00007744677,0.0002792697,0.00007162396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011151423,0.001272684,0.00057260855,0.004185661,0.002970075,0.0069636703,0.00089725433,0.0031556978,0.016584761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032683765,0.0005656271,0.0003342891,0.00380515,0.003202194,0.007440523,0.0019938233,0.0041580107,0.007984266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000463621,0.000027348085,0.0006342713,0.00085245323,0.000014220186,0.0001271373,0.009032042,0.00014742237,0.00030615393,0.21439952,0.64012367,0.13428946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028914158,0.0000058544833,0.001101563,0.00085474417,0.0000041056833,0.00016815019,0.0014812818,0.000059090136,0.00018411674,0.013786901,0.9823402,0.000011034096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016976738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03694941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016976738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00447002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004678229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055481553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236734241","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511732270.006","title":"Integrity and impartial morality <scp>i</scp>","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03293198270481697,"score_gpt":0.2385219595341263,"score_spread":0.20558997682930935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236734241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036273766,0.016845083,0.0026026976,0.012131294,0.0009131468,0.000013465801,0.00008425257,0.00008014419,0.9669671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05517843,0.029486937,0.0025585215,0.005937385,0.0025074778,0.00009646471,0.00021598447,0.0003330657,0.9036857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899095,0.00033593783,0.000025733196,0.00008047482,0.00048694792,0.00008000261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988016,0.0006396808,0.000062122825,0.00014090852,0.0002767881,0.000078807076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011001424,0.00046362044,0.00043149042,0.0010124877,0.002097654,0.005805738,0.00074528536,0.0022261846,0.0434466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037965758,0.00028527385,0.00032172506,0.0013000978,0.006757361,0.005304551,0.0016424945,0.0043345587,0.013539415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048857196,0.000008722771,0.000039608974,0.00011689397,0.0000028959441,0.00002827712,0.00080285507,0.00012732345,0.000083212195,0.7049841,0.25835714,0.035444193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026218472,0.0000062690283,0.00023635036,0.00041950934,0.0000030357478,0.00008017257,0.0003660776,0.0001974463,0.00022851741,0.26989615,0.7285554,0.000008510248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004781853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066047753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0434466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040826355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028732081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14534336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236974478","doi":"10.31269/vol12iss1pp214-237","title":"A Critical and Semiotic Approach to the Wonderful, Horrible Life Cycle of the Kony 2012 Viral Video","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"tripleC Communication Capitalism & Critique Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Semiotics; Narrative; Rhetoric; Realm; Sociology; Media studies; Agora; Aesthetics; Literature; Law; Art; Philosophy; Epistemology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.027227571709401124,"score_gpt":0.3914314893742851,"score_spread":0.364203917664884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236974478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08676567,0.009711679,0.06630437,0.052440323,0.0026780241,0.0003704214,0.00024622542,0.00020448437,0.78127885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477566,0.0022455782,0.008267527,0.0024342465,0.00085236033,0.00032469776,0.00007949074,0.00026001225,0.03777948],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558395,0.003506461,0.00005916537,0.0002160245,0.00035083672,0.00028349887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99465215,0.003912535,0.00028931024,0.00027038474,0.00056342647,0.00031216154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043302067,0.000776266,0.00035879255,0.0024374514,0.010235995,0.01525385,0.0011257558,0.0029488183,0.004584288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009001476,0.00032527887,0.0003466663,0.0012024496,0.05088434,0.010115613,0.0048299395,0.005215804,0.00077563815],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026037407,0.00001059676,0.00014745498,0.00006461415,0.000002294658,0.00029796982,0.16573246,0.000121452555,0.00037341172,0.82575655,0.0038596585,0.003607547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016493179,0.00004946083,0.0005910359,0.0006154253,0.000008269338,0.00074063335,0.25309762,0.0011070479,0.0011511975,0.28475165,0.45782512,0.000046008263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043520615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004294216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01525385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072677745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025346423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052731633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237528935","doi":"10.22215/etd/2013-06611","title":"The performative power of naming : the use of \"gay-straight alliance\" in debate over Ontario's Accepting School Act (Bill 13)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Performative utterance; Power (physics); Rehearsing; Political science; Humanities; Art; Visual arts; Physics; Aesthetics; Law","score_opus":0.032768329650929136,"score_gpt":0.3038059804483684,"score_spread":0.27103765079743924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237528935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117912196,0.0023595889,0.0024468545,0.09446943,0.00048544034,0.00009113945,0.00021772872,0.00003600741,0.78198165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438832,0.0007874229,0.00053146464,0.0037612899,0.00009080195,0.00006667268,0.00003454647,0.00003554225,0.050809097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927412,0.003950463,0.00019674447,0.00048575216,0.0014673328,0.0011585114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900665,0.0059485934,0.0009222736,0.00055251626,0.0016617699,0.00084828294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008313922,0.0003230334,0.00027746902,0.00130039,0.032758933,0.009709563,0.0017985848,0.005860411,0.0054843645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017140571,0.00044018266,0.00023548312,0.0025345217,0.04421084,0.005235694,0.004004894,0.005326844,0.00046835997],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032136424,0.000008710923,0.0023563555,0.00004605697,0.0000042632246,0.00019591572,0.30771118,0.000057535923,0.00019483149,0.65670824,0.026662838,0.0060218833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003651748,0.000026418898,0.021485666,0.00064616714,0.000043705117,0.00018649222,0.4428974,0.0005063415,0.0006359175,0.071443915,0.461996,0.000095369935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9055307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9666036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09446931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059831433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045797713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43410945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238239031","doi":"10.1017/9781316875544.001","title":"Cases","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Simon Fraser University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Content (measure theory); Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029789177676458993,"score_gpt":0.31151459837025963,"score_spread":0.28172542069380063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238239031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009050219,0.0005261824,0.00067632395,0.0031856105,0.00071162276,0.00016368837,0.0032744964,0.00023506294,0.99032193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024282053,0.0019934964,0.0011125703,0.0069138706,0.00055281434,0.00042189626,0.005117892,0.00035883536,0.95924675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99426645,0.0006843434,0.00030529324,0.00058228464,0.0029979735,0.0011636567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996378,0.0011443978,0.00020275827,0.00065325014,0.0011569847,0.00046458014],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033419523,0.0006785877,0.00054430484,0.0054907533,0.0051111146,0.00569693,0.0023421482,0.004137273,0.36582357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015181947,0.00049123255,0.001175635,0.003936781,0.0014601328,0.0036290165,0.0036562579,0.0032663702,0.13089657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022746888,0.00004016012,0.00048737068,0.00010888029,0.00000553233,0.0004480564,0.00044942775,0.000048975766,0.00014789062,0.13694541,0.8400975,0.02119795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008076397,0.000007215799,0.00080660754,0.0002200321,0.000007473457,0.00034174076,0.000422377,0.00006595351,0.00019640622,0.0070005567,0.9909136,0.00001001525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02822786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03401725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63417643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050143437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061199665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239068153","doi":"10.3138/cras.39.2.139","title":"Tonto on Vacation, or How to Be an Indian Lawyer","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comics; Indigenous; Fantasy; History; White (mutation); Commission; Media studies; Literature; Law; Sociology; Art; Political science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.05002889077552881,"score_gpt":0.3741474342846523,"score_spread":0.3241185435091235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239068153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019289762,0.020077527,0.00045090204,0.098709196,0.0037841194,0.000033653472,0.00003557856,0.00008063169,0.8575387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4670607,0.023628134,0.00083500316,0.07052817,0.002069693,0.00006992439,0.000055836324,0.00008016778,0.43567237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986357,0.0005251929,0.000031507243,0.00015415803,0.00021526324,0.00043811966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983852,0.00042325008,0.00012862659,0.00011157095,0.00019283027,0.0007585309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093904644,0.0001626069,0.000206188,0.00043237113,0.0076500825,0.0069054705,0.0007398359,0.0017327912,0.020974427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038126789,0.0001424779,0.00010852331,0.0005968815,0.0071389964,0.004984102,0.0020828191,0.003403581,0.0037453598],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024491985,0.00015376243,0.0032759039,0.00039954204,0.0000073110805,0.0008248017,0.05694723,0.00003991922,0.00055405736,0.32154584,0.5060828,0.110144414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030236567,0.000017120954,0.0015099142,0.00018114962,0.00000262188,0.00025997305,0.030827316,0.000010122724,0.000052202493,0.0027384318,0.9643898,0.000008244099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02527142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069720335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02527142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030806065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066711023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07016647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239083780","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9780748697908.003.0005","title":"‘The Crown Wears Many Hats’: Canadian Aboriginal Law and the Black-boxing of Empire","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Empire; Law; Honour; Colonialism; History; Common law; Sociology; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.021642037484730287,"score_gpt":0.24448168870175274,"score_spread":0.22283965121702246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239083780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07096287,0.025357367,0.0031663447,0.28489178,0.0013815683,0.000047444806,0.00025833587,0.00010793276,0.6138264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8778234,0.008134732,0.0024493812,0.021191899,0.00027218641,0.00003412923,0.00008040362,0.00010609705,0.08990766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592173,0.00069313316,0.00006151836,0.0003653522,0.001508413,0.0014499517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962639,0.0011173198,0.00016137863,0.00018466193,0.0016697999,0.00060285145],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028513314,0.0004989431,0.00036508794,0.0021898313,0.03765907,0.014141786,0.0024575198,0.0047221123,0.007040103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008099689,0.00039640168,0.00037227926,0.0030048199,0.03638371,0.0045592096,0.0038326585,0.00579597,0.00045582635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016511176,0.000008536821,0.00130928,0.000072144205,0.000008171739,0.00034158013,0.08090281,0.00022062905,0.00017225104,0.8421661,0.061179515,0.013602503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015179397,0.000012163605,0.0061533847,0.00037019645,0.000030193536,0.00025454393,0.08573736,0.00063837634,0.00035798023,0.08692322,0.8193958,0.00011156274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99740916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96234095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14230132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15300635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239163146","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2578597","title":"Cannibal Laws","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01905322390461878,"score_gpt":0.29682988765490287,"score_spread":0.2777766637502841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239163146","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001456166,0.0006802631,0.0021346074,0.013285478,0.0006295955,0.00003146491,0.00010804226,0.00007875826,0.9815957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.084420234,0.0007707054,0.0017173694,0.021749549,0.0005273409,0.00014455523,0.00010587401,0.00021964654,0.89034474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970235,0.00058688974,0.0000939345,0.00072702375,0.0010522066,0.0005164423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636793,0.0014021448,0.00015471123,0.0008672801,0.0010452719,0.0001625965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027481748,0.0005923536,0.00059073797,0.0021140552,0.0077508413,0.0066255755,0.0014858298,0.0077449754,0.07931373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01446625,0.0005138169,0.0007460165,0.0012684937,0.00872981,0.006392426,0.0027159785,0.008940987,0.015322159],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000467306,0.000006264449,0.00006254531,0.0000073152205,0.0000014512723,0.000013945021,0.00029399045,0.000024664676,0.000016769141,0.95119894,0.044629905,0.0037395165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014177357,0.000008067798,0.00023798337,0.00010613759,0.000009566823,0.000053518263,0.00030234602,0.00022090384,0.00021681408,0.43638614,0.5624296,0.0000147558185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03802315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05381121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07931373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074228095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060474877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26533085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239357241","doi":"10.1007/10978.1572-8617","title":"Law and Critique","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"paratext","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Liverpool; University of Alberta","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.014009200128907946,"score_gpt":0.30291623338010754,"score_spread":0.2889070332511996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239357241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01285992,0.025647558,0.006242801,0.25444734,0.004436066,0.000101431884,0.00020769423,0.00016016097,0.6958971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71182996,0.010683325,0.004115277,0.046797805,0.00295462,0.0002723258,0.00017466756,0.00022231649,0.22294977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99289495,0.0042946264,0.0002674524,0.00081181433,0.0012591175,0.00047202545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99307185,0.0037703896,0.00043050415,0.0011472563,0.0013081615,0.00027179133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073340344,0.00055971305,0.00057607313,0.0018683732,0.009795917,0.014895621,0.0014423411,0.0072521036,0.0089192875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020462848,0.00021312782,0.00047862538,0.0021524737,0.040448982,0.0071795327,0.0046118065,0.005690486,0.0021111027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045396164,0.000010278004,0.00017747312,0.000077901735,0.000004195513,0.00008527427,0.014369402,0.00008531632,0.0000471719,0.926685,0.047707178,0.010746273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039112583,0.000012389311,0.0003623831,0.00047725675,0.0000044133094,0.000110621004,0.013497839,0.00017095663,0.00011736338,0.29924268,0.68599355,0.0000067326514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014188203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011105118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014895621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014849872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013120265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10774386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241341423","doi":"10.3138/jcs.40.2.163","title":"Is That Copyright Too Strong? Copyright in Archival Material","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copyright law; Fair use; Statutory law; Copyright Act; Public domain; Law; Authorization; Work (physics); Intellectual property; Law and economics; Political science; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science; History; Computer security; Engineering","score_opus":0.035770030038518405,"score_gpt":0.304171687183285,"score_spread":0.2684016571447666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241341423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059284814,0.023760077,0.006081799,0.36643192,0.002549564,0.00008558213,0.00015439198,0.00012252622,0.54152936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9158808,0.014850807,0.0024149616,0.026883593,0.0015681584,0.000044256496,0.000059842958,0.00011145772,0.038186103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829694,0.0038927472,0.00050282036,0.0012386974,0.008409181,0.002987159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97069633,0.013728558,0.0018304002,0.0031398425,0.008185096,0.0024198361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0137587655,0.0002939162,0.00068273774,0.0026882845,0.021739483,0.03650954,0.002031132,0.005775497,0.009502996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044613834,0.00050498033,0.00041119553,0.005704406,0.07617782,0.023880368,0.006166338,0.007698634,0.0010374483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017834967,0.000014353615,0.0018233736,0.00015941114,0.000015779988,0.0003372437,0.028981373,0.00007889228,0.00031806473,0.9013108,0.029367099,0.03757566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021433081,0.00002721749,0.006721685,0.0016903995,0.00006358679,0.00052717543,0.0742338,0.00035971738,0.0010242715,0.28479543,0.6304259,0.00010939585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63298965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62506163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36701035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047894876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.066574045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7383435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241376021","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14649057","title":"Collingwood’s philosophy of art as a basis for virtue aesthetics.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Aesthetics; Normative; Philosophy; Virtue ethics; Order (exchange); Everyday Aesthetics; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Expression (computer science); Computer science","score_opus":0.03362106991489079,"score_gpt":0.3115444094357186,"score_spread":0.2779233395208278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241376021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009956688,0.0071510132,0.047437392,0.023784602,0.001074764,0.000046037916,0.000044939035,0.00008312541,0.9104215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79520744,0.0044653756,0.028654233,0.009763421,0.001258302,0.00020360546,0.000049260547,0.0001668172,0.16023153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977088,0.0010308337,0.00007189667,0.00031547315,0.00071409415,0.00015897243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987141,0.00066259236,0.00009539705,0.00017378571,0.00025691238,0.00009726561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025154578,0.00050734635,0.00023791731,0.0014090308,0.0036735034,0.004809127,0.00059790636,0.003025606,0.004336245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026809373,0.00019849282,0.00039183217,0.000606734,0.022606842,0.00403265,0.0021139293,0.0034904613,0.0009789845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023651005,0.0000023833752,0.00002749179,0.000011163366,7.285887e-7,0.00001273228,0.0008252297,0.000054442153,0.000027700567,0.99431425,0.0025991222,0.0021223272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004282628,0.000008763832,0.00016950883,0.00005912307,0.0000021528413,0.00008786533,0.000489371,0.00033837807,0.00011836502,0.8707355,0.12798066,0.0000060489965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002500921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035139886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004809127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032578027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00199989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023637056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241600539","doi":"10.17118/11143/12333","title":"Revue de droit. Université de Sherbrooke. Volume 32 - Numéro 2","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"paratext","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.010155633088559822,"score_gpt":0.20416281457710775,"score_spread":0.19400718148854793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241600539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015377639,0.21287687,0.0006868428,0.020574553,0.007228114,0.00005608791,0.009938663,0.00058506674,0.74651605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009981955,0.033290666,0.00032526502,0.00088491535,0.0005170846,0.00005543161,0.0014192022,0.00037087494,0.9531546],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987453,0.00019226437,0.00008925124,0.0002571815,0.000519146,0.0001968433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990594,0.00024824156,0.000119918666,0.00013659154,0.00028395426,0.0001519234],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011057294,0.001796008,0.0014243427,0.002928699,0.0019841488,0.006111776,0.0012984612,0.0031338525,0.5203955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003635876,0.00068672263,0.00036100572,0.0057311,0.0012661115,0.0046462542,0.002462433,0.0030224994,0.2141189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009471254,0.000018641418,0.00022988726,0.0005186864,0.000007461699,0.0000772185,0.0002711944,0.00008447681,0.00020296402,0.019823799,0.8715675,0.10710345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069158937,0.000004315454,0.0005344652,0.00019089541,0.0000012744554,0.000034132176,0.000091770286,0.00001171641,0.00008437602,0.00048774824,0.99854845,0.0000038773196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.083416946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11007193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5203955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009965273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050201304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6840976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241628670","doi":"10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0988","title":"Legal Geography","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"International Encyclopedia of Geography","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Empirical legal studies; Scholarship; Discipline; Political science; Critical geography; Cultural geography; Legal research; Space (punctuation); Legal profession; Legal pluralism; Jurisprudence; Legal realism; Law; Sociology; Human geography; Social science","score_opus":0.007365667562215713,"score_gpt":0.27950637246005633,"score_spread":0.2721407048978406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241628670","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013159667,0.004984737,0.0023017214,0.0077484488,0.00031530202,0.000045021232,0.00082395086,0.00013861447,0.9823261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15389614,0.018729236,0.006803789,0.00665776,0.0013202312,0.00019052648,0.0031662364,0.0004152858,0.8088208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982242,0.0005328389,0.00012968313,0.0003157749,0.0005675623,0.0002299181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979814,0.0006084089,0.00017809408,0.00035783724,0.00052404247,0.00035015217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012266168,0.0003476171,0.00034228512,0.0025376605,0.0034148828,0.008597146,0.00085445505,0.0021481651,0.12297819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00541247,0.00020684587,0.0002636286,0.003550796,0.0051300405,0.005420559,0.003751213,0.0019496639,0.029870624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003394458,0.000007785241,0.00040231878,0.00008279933,0.0000023826165,0.00006694968,0.0015568294,0.000089330155,0.000052880503,0.8144083,0.14272891,0.040598188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.975149e-7,0.0000018730211,0.00040832,0.00012270131,6.3226787e-7,0.000073247,0.00057730486,0.00003249863,0.000021328373,0.038076665,0.9606822,0.0000024718104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010685498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010064415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12297819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055289813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005514745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.411403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241759243","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/bkrgd","title":"Trump’s New Face of Power in America","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Power (physics); Politics; Sociology; Assemblage (archaeology); Democracy; Constellation; Limiting; Aesthetics; History; Epistemology; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Social science","score_opus":0.021865436331601307,"score_gpt":0.3128902671218407,"score_spread":0.2910248307902394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241759243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15185264,0.004587509,0.0061292453,0.10933659,0.001229241,0.000022101534,0.000046225632,0.00008366031,0.7267128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.962928,0.00078621897,0.00063908915,0.0061285337,0.00041449248,0.000021039446,0.000011707347,0.000057594756,0.029013347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977188,0.0008426569,0.000027079644,0.00027191528,0.0005368839,0.00060261146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921334,0.00031036724,0.00008093078,0.000078848665,0.00013978333,0.00017665753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014189071,0.00020757453,0.00023844233,0.0009319866,0.0130797075,0.0072493306,0.0006164399,0.0026516533,0.0047504767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030602438,0.00021893233,0.00018737014,0.00092071097,0.02768476,0.0064375717,0.0049810736,0.0067339744,0.0004144285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010281912,0.000009133556,0.00033088226,0.000010015936,0.0000014669725,0.00014428016,0.038001973,0.00004278626,0.00013370409,0.942202,0.01130046,0.007813079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000129041055,0.000028160412,0.001085863,0.000097243115,0.0000041892663,0.00025239377,0.036424235,0.00027850523,0.0002362103,0.3079424,0.65361017,0.000027838494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019096637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030922623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019096637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070868186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029622952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051418662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242090596","doi":"10.3138/utq.75.4.905","title":"The Cost of Persuasion: Figure, Story, and Eloquence in the Rhetoric of Judicial Discourse","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Rhetoric; Literature; Aesthetics; Political science; Sociology; Linguistics; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.008410694363741627,"score_gpt":0.2417941996428678,"score_spread":0.23338350527912619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242090596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30111784,0.007728567,0.025283013,0.08468014,0.00067428016,0.00006947973,0.0002231202,0.00016294177,0.58006066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99601775,0.00036012096,0.00087399216,0.0004442032,0.00016641084,0.000017881928,0.000017198869,0.000062931846,0.0020394032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826912,0.012760648,0.0003822363,0.00090448966,0.0024976414,0.0007636747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8974279,0.08885509,0.0045923763,0.0035756528,0.00439503,0.0011538607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012405317,0.00052653375,0.0008230433,0.0029200811,0.006073324,0.017286457,0.002007307,0.005762022,0.012101514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08523374,0.0008607404,0.00037130312,0.001990165,0.0299278,0.020153157,0.0043574227,0.0056567267,0.0007077836],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000245711,0.000050135204,0.0026873064,0.00026358606,0.000030899308,0.00028193137,0.12007312,0.00056496076,0.00054449675,0.8526466,0.005060925,0.017550407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022273704,0.000183724,0.008924275,0.000912273,0.00018808733,0.0008056061,0.10236398,0.006573868,0.00272724,0.7963893,0.08058511,0.00012380205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0099118585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006783314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017286457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008491765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035489276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065606415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243464741","doi":"10.4324/9781315143132","title":"Integrationism and the Self","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Humanities Research Group, University of Windsor; University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.009267739050681793,"score_gpt":0.25318559958875286,"score_spread":0.24391786053807107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243464741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011039606,0.006904869,0.010097747,0.009653649,0.00040731617,0.000015826065,0.000022523103,0.00005513119,0.9618033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7692633,0.005240744,0.0063986653,0.0038691834,0.00057740475,0.000115826406,0.00008485436,0.0001463323,0.21430372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984189,0.000737676,0.000035895355,0.0001804308,0.00044093785,0.0001860628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929655,0.00033717888,0.000055487402,0.00010829874,0.00011608856,0.000086256696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001515419,0.00034677473,0.00033379518,0.00094497186,0.0050696796,0.0063460167,0.00061180687,0.0016587599,0.006273079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018645542,0.00019920022,0.00038881763,0.0008529668,0.025250124,0.007869436,0.0050241593,0.0035784317,0.0010321056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022932977,0.0000026191226,0.0000292716,0.0000072611942,5.3677576e-7,0.000016467551,0.00198473,0.00002133211,0.00002747021,0.9933443,0.001703408,0.0028603277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047856083,0.000008578179,0.00014589741,0.00007258899,0.0000019543202,0.000100807134,0.0023534372,0.00021911577,0.000109725326,0.81834424,0.17863475,0.0000041649714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021036302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022640903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063460167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047432543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026180781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034414828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244011216","doi":"10.24908/iqurcp.9252","title":"Liberty and the City","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Sociology; Right to the city; Politics; Subsidy; Negative liberty; Law; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.12332415662966735,"score_gpt":0.40575944283826637,"score_spread":0.28243528620859903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244011216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047699437,0.0064893905,0.0062522776,0.060323864,0.00041112033,0.000045815937,0.00009424491,0.000039241106,0.8786445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95484656,0.0020646497,0.0012252533,0.004474345,0.0001962754,0.00006965103,0.000050223283,0.000032636348,0.037040386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99708986,0.0013820888,0.00006524112,0.00035368613,0.00039488386,0.0007142013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856144,0.00051899697,0.00013807415,0.00028506733,0.00013225684,0.00036420772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023883383,0.00033076011,0.00041691115,0.0006935529,0.01074039,0.00906952,0.00074920186,0.0021924023,0.007879263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035753488,0.00023195673,0.00043781596,0.00080784573,0.05641032,0.0057996805,0.010197959,0.004960348,0.00073144794],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002352625,0.0000039184497,0.00014194798,0.0000058035876,0.0000010164804,0.000016355627,0.0020583328,0.000061323575,0.000012630431,0.994453,0.0015402393,0.0017030899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012053979,0.000013110164,0.0006873209,0.000089501445,0.000004015436,0.00006435515,0.0045543555,0.000115304276,0.00009730042,0.8106878,0.18366344,0.000011358437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009071808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01194695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01074039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007618747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006619082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055278063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244075364","doi":"10.4337/9781788119085.00006","title":"Introduction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; University of Oxford; York University; Princeton University; University of Cambridge; Bucknell University","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Cognitive science; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0212621650691352,"score_gpt":0.2500793698313437,"score_spread":0.22881720476220851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244075364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00079681777,0.004430571,0.002127316,0.0064163185,0.0031609496,0.0000893868,0.0013494038,0.00037416778,0.98125505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007924718,0.00379161,0.0017246017,0.0033079258,0.0009439535,0.000087400185,0.0014965999,0.0002541964,0.9804689],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989108,0.00016008143,0.00005504054,0.00028652215,0.00045547125,0.00013207845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914527,0.00016376471,0.00004925998,0.00013836253,0.00035251942,0.0001507236],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007154704,0.000800423,0.00061097945,0.0014611454,0.0026807676,0.006183445,0.0018141512,0.0031863977,0.41428277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029396762,0.000285917,0.0005475059,0.0016803137,0.0015695945,0.004444295,0.0031307926,0.0026712117,0.20853224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041890213,0.000043753946,0.00035803122,0.00026195793,0.0000045796073,0.00019290477,0.0011576114,0.0001382528,0.0003166027,0.16306973,0.70441663,0.12999797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013350601,0.0000054151424,0.000118107215,0.00008166323,8.313558e-7,0.000079421494,0.0001437907,0.000018901226,0.000035886704,0.0051694848,0.9943427,0.000002524657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003931439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005020223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41428277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024065445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025184194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8354545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244343506","doi":"10.1558/sll.2002.9.2.193","title":"(Re)contextualizing complainants' accounts of sexual assault","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Speech Language and the Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Adversarial system; Sexual assault; Ideology; Hegemony; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Sexual violence; Space (punctuation); Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; History; Linguistics; Politics","score_opus":0.02312777667389926,"score_gpt":0.3117324496336906,"score_spread":0.28860467295979136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244343506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9503477,0.0019690637,0.0034750502,0.00498448,0.000116955176,0.000114365495,0.00020505456,0.000035103752,0.038752276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99504894,0.00066430593,0.00052014383,0.00033718935,0.00004163389,0.00005547838,0.00010769368,0.000042105938,0.0031824287],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859503,0.010636919,0.0006295087,0.0006889073,0.0011878948,0.00090646785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97415435,0.020629218,0.001856449,0.0016718138,0.0012215346,0.00046662442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009696802,0.0006433127,0.0006289126,0.0036509477,0.011389379,0.008925267,0.0015437551,0.0028855298,0.0037588046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03543277,0.0005277774,0.00034872143,0.0037647893,0.019016577,0.0070191734,0.01241441,0.0047590286,0.00037394284],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020998668,0.0000063363545,0.00089868245,0.000049013102,0.000003743505,0.0004752679,0.98911625,0.000028451272,0.00038624508,0.006918392,0.00033157808,0.0017649094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046236883,0.000019519975,0.00363446,0.00016896073,0.000008707407,0.0005360832,0.9677778,0.00011874286,0.0006959292,0.002593805,0.024422793,0.000018464933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02575237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038956918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02575237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005139462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026409456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051282167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244449218","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59140-789-8.ch075","title":"E-Government as a New Frontier for Legal Theory","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Pace; Government (linguistics); Corporate governance; Public relations; Open government; Information and Communications Technology; Publication; Frontier; Political science; Business; Transparency (behavior); Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.021732841858655608,"score_gpt":0.2896459057893719,"score_spread":0.2679130639307163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244449218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027797911,0.08226068,0.013417723,0.08691874,0.0019336201,0.00002873016,0.000057424633,0.000092502894,0.8125109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3081297,0.16774425,0.028768223,0.0436501,0.007167027,0.00024959334,0.00027689038,0.0002734445,0.4437408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881196,0.00057456025,0.00004249721,0.00011146185,0.00035828297,0.00010127929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983614,0.0011321765,0.00006299637,0.00016915197,0.00015757272,0.00011677592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016884474,0.0004539151,0.0004956644,0.0015633738,0.0028566713,0.0077644074,0.00096094,0.004813794,0.011135252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018403488,0.00027582032,0.00044543896,0.002068602,0.019013157,0.013638671,0.0024085222,0.007548931,0.0028295454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.048557e-7,0.000005031558,0.000012212381,0.000022262542,4.3355283e-7,0.000011248942,0.00034325893,0.00007201572,0.00001724355,0.9836505,0.009806868,0.006058222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023230637,0.0000035347505,0.000039020542,0.00023965568,9.220965e-7,0.000040148992,0.00050156214,0.00022663735,0.00003810965,0.6932178,0.30568647,0.0000037463913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025144133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033572132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011135252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006607908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051412666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04794395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245151068","doi":"10.2307/3504591","title":"10.2307/3504591","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.007624840432059108,"score_gpt":0.22048463046050512,"score_spread":0.21285979002844602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245151068","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027535137,0.00030950175,0.00030869932,0.00028736755,0.00034084954,0.00004157822,0.0007281109,0.00049071194,0.9972178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009637354,0.000313105,0.00035167573,0.00035504054,0.0000854616,0.000026987567,0.0009366945,0.00029124456,0.9966761],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994217,0.000049786297,0.000043313124,0.00015370252,0.00024235238,0.000089174144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806505,0.00042683163,0.00007254937,0.000337783,0.0005083647,0.0005893934],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008105418,0.0015817569,0.001090684,0.002183296,0.0018604596,0.0048227296,0.0017390971,0.0026725293,0.98343164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002082524,0.00072826765,0.00073884847,0.0026272782,0.0017138442,0.005439102,0.0040000672,0.0017006107,0.98347706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015026293,0.00014063936,0.0004432552,0.00037661282,0.000013448234,0.00017387373,0.00009373275,0.00013915883,0.0015025951,0.006624142,0.6119543,0.37838805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020313033,0.000029884004,0.00074724015,0.00015823751,0.000005494992,0.0001799327,0.000118448545,0.00009823869,0.00020352444,0.001095119,0.9973304,0.000013128694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004222626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048916265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016568363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011335765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013255456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023632765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245152921","doi":"10.2307/3505168","title":"10.2307/3505168","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Political philosophy; Philosophy of law; Epistemology; Political science; Normative social influence; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Law; Philosophy; Comparative law","score_opus":0.007624840432059108,"score_gpt":0.22048463046050512,"score_spread":0.21285979002844602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245152921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028587147,0.00032905082,0.0003227818,0.0002807122,0.00033621403,0.000041345866,0.0007900601,0.00056578155,0.9970482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010241925,0.0003405048,0.0003988961,0.0003705473,0.000093494265,0.00002963427,0.0010551955,0.00032730354,0.99636024],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999469,0.000046652633,0.00004132855,0.00014055855,0.00021644578,0.000085953354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980988,0.0004202012,0.000071224444,0.00035134712,0.0004638689,0.0005944765],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007999483,0.0016210204,0.0011097842,0.0022755275,0.001836573,0.004878514,0.0018224353,0.002692226,0.98422986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020315584,0.00078216277,0.00075100106,0.00253877,0.001761904,0.005904141,0.0041577914,0.0017070954,0.98437816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015294492,0.0001449323,0.00045770433,0.00038932686,0.00001338728,0.00018053138,0.00009333461,0.00014011597,0.001370739,0.0068462775,0.6130767,0.377134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021232107,0.000029412602,0.0007316036,0.00016812653,0.000005346343,0.00018876584,0.00011980164,0.000099742196,0.00018699809,0.0011672749,0.9972681,0.000013491985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004193503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046754964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015770137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001133271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013188977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022494197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245544978","doi":"10.3138/utlj.57.4.781","title":"THE ROLE OF EMOTIONS IN THE RULE OF LAW","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rule of law; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.008709613143756954,"score_gpt":0.238056225269696,"score_spread":0.22934661212593904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245544978","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35925108,0.0032998298,0.004217054,0.030781008,0.00020687211,0.000031682895,0.00007264172,0.000023266675,0.60211664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964295,0.00024661038,0.00013896303,0.00031627738,0.000028315588,0.0000057671296,0.0000037034797,0.000007667168,0.002823262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711406,0.0016910706,0.00006866991,0.00025041946,0.0003963929,0.00047929387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99017847,0.006752275,0.00082166714,0.00047016423,0.00081374374,0.00096359855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031078188,0.00019492574,0.00034349464,0.0007303172,0.0042735916,0.0113801975,0.0008942113,0.002730171,0.005760629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012307501,0.00029914,0.00023552938,0.00067022693,0.038080182,0.0040700487,0.0024527188,0.0028386372,0.00027688686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010227793,0.000064490145,0.0053744502,0.000076169774,0.000023294404,0.000383719,0.072107024,0.0007860251,0.0004999814,0.9053361,0.0035188082,0.011727644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091728514,0.000055793214,0.037350833,0.00016293112,0.000043454867,0.00016681259,0.06608176,0.002097606,0.00052148156,0.84492195,0.048432857,0.0000729184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06606945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056630578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06606945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064898683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00470013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13136977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245605678","doi":"10.3138/utlj.62.2.255","title":"The Logic of Planning and the Aim of the Law","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Law; Nothing; Argument (complex analysis); Equivocation; Legal positivism; Order (exchange); Positivism; Political science; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Legal realism; Legal profession; Economics","score_opus":0.01463502003074349,"score_gpt":0.24117583763820172,"score_spread":0.22654081760745823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245605678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009134968,0.00878733,0.11354851,0.08027922,0.00062828127,0.00006000046,0.00021784689,0.0002025769,0.7871412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89954317,0.005382508,0.028901296,0.0075207534,0.0006304151,0.0002610384,0.00014615638,0.00016977525,0.05744491],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583495,0.0021111597,0.00013203266,0.0005004183,0.0009103669,0.00051109126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967782,0.0019708604,0.0002371147,0.00034861645,0.0004014055,0.00026387678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052921544,0.00055253186,0.00041424859,0.0013954731,0.005398716,0.010772452,0.0013562145,0.0033014007,0.006632996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061213216,0.000571733,0.0006557454,0.0016290125,0.04617013,0.010877596,0.0037386087,0.0058475095,0.001262799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023197333,0.0000011681228,0.000024083382,0.000005937504,8.776388e-7,0.000008088577,0.00028477536,0.000093131144,0.0000075916914,0.9976738,0.0009731439,0.0009250352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075046237,0.0000042613906,0.00005711278,0.000037202717,0.0000024222484,0.000015729354,0.00031236227,0.00026175793,0.00006370219,0.9640693,0.03516369,0.000004949885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013414566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012677465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013414566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0091416305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01092036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06632745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245754241","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511493911","title":"Audio-visual Coverage of Courts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Audio visual; Political science; Order (exchange); Identification (biology); Action plan; Plan (archaeology); Law; Public relations; Business; Multimedia; History; Computer science; Computer security; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.017999312674909323,"score_gpt":0.2338740470226775,"score_spread":0.2158747343477682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245754241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018256668,0.015987057,0.0012329646,0.0055633755,0.00037107372,0.00001739155,0.000064304295,0.000044914075,0.95846224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7489388,0.022162614,0.00096125883,0.003633975,0.0018036319,0.00005955068,0.00017349228,0.00006249786,0.22220416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998154,0.0006965901,0.000050221257,0.00012387775,0.0007770661,0.00019815081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974956,0.0016880706,0.00027238054,0.00019684237,0.00022972158,0.00011733567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006128498,0.00019177987,0.00015547377,0.0019801494,0.0022881995,0.007101527,0.0006867108,0.0012740442,0.010661112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004711406,0.0001238405,0.00014145114,0.0027403138,0.0039351606,0.0032747113,0.0031270017,0.0011541306,0.0010484048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036516107,0.000054206746,0.0010558958,0.0005182094,0.000009096149,0.00082974765,0.050598193,0.00032761574,0.0013245365,0.5796179,0.11179514,0.25383282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005743986,0.000032766115,0.0031215444,0.00079799927,0.0000065610147,0.0011429935,0.010797867,0.00015677762,0.0005749478,0.020135485,0.963217,0.000010361493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035631168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005551862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010661112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021504099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013272751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035665035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245851333","doi":"10.2307/3505202","title":"10.2307/3505202","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Ontology; Political philosophy; Naturalism; Legal research; Political science; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Comparative law","score_opus":0.007762911688377272,"score_gpt":0.22032115138262584,"score_spread":0.21255823969424856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245851333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028091084,0.000285111,0.00033210596,0.00028572234,0.0003320483,0.00004516983,0.00097023696,0.0005956916,0.9968731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009826785,0.00029214387,0.0003825655,0.0003531895,0.00008846663,0.000030220603,0.0012584699,0.000342979,0.9962692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946433,0.000047229354,0.000042700813,0.00014171287,0.00022086033,0.000083174615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998131,0.00039043292,0.000069230075,0.0003593773,0.00048041315,0.00056954904],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079783914,0.0015573588,0.0010688296,0.0022871688,0.001825995,0.0050528306,0.0018187438,0.002584593,0.98399734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020140815,0.0007634239,0.00075802143,0.0027958783,0.0016533723,0.005702673,0.0039367178,0.001711314,0.9843295],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014138331,0.00014097212,0.00041754244,0.00037437366,0.00001309242,0.00016854127,0.000084157116,0.00013185375,0.001477276,0.007001078,0.627295,0.36275476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021103715,0.000029354005,0.00074004044,0.0001564979,0.0000050673752,0.00016620426,0.000102447244,0.00009552212,0.00020457184,0.0010828003,0.9973832,0.000013116085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042238026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004615483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016002655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011852364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013203733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022825778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245933352","doi":"10.1017/ccol0521792711.004","title":"<i>Resurrection </i>","year":2002,"lang":"he","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Estate; Law; Criminology; Art; History; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.029430763856830536,"score_gpt":0.21447441494050326,"score_spread":0.1850436510836727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245933352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00392247,0.009674338,0.000360058,0.01067021,0.0039457614,0.00002403111,0.0000460701,0.000068060974,0.97128886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041302748,0.002056169,0.00013254487,0.004186225,0.00047092853,0.000018486491,0.000036889243,0.000056217687,0.9517398],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995148,0.0000884029,0.000010665922,0.0000702751,0.00014263092,0.00017321031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99985087,0.00003059725,0.00001345158,0.000020787653,0.00004567611,0.000038634087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034624257,0.0005185236,0.00017934012,0.00055041956,0.0059787123,0.0028884504,0.00068229967,0.0014044157,0.02167617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007733572,0.000206427,0.0002140181,0.0003435465,0.0053994614,0.0021508671,0.0022836905,0.0037586193,0.007062421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022567703,0.000017963222,0.00024521726,0.00007176934,0.0000032853275,0.00040832144,0.016139112,0.000035777663,0.0003150815,0.29434115,0.6517789,0.03662087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001063803,0.0000036370143,0.00016275355,0.000026032896,5.380967e-7,0.000091077236,0.00093114405,0.0000054840034,0.00007471809,0.0012111053,0.99749017,0.0000022090132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029596461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07187116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029596461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040889494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021026535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07251406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246162766","doi":"10.1089/glre.2015.19113","title":"Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Joseph LeClair <i>[2014] O.J. No. 2700, 2014 ON.C. LEXIS 2994 (Ontario Court of Justice, March 19, 2014)</i>","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gaming Law Review and Economics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Art; Economic Justice; Lexis; Humanities; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0374808489849111,"score_gpt":0.2876950274305874,"score_spread":0.2502141784456763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246162766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004020817,0.018778281,0.00096966024,0.12788428,0.0035216515,0.00009378199,0.00088145887,0.00020099367,0.8436491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022319471,0.0023784102,0.00028358464,0.031167269,0.00028444405,0.00004163869,0.00011835317,0.000075587996,0.94333124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861896,0.00015683188,0.00003982852,0.00018124274,0.0005392259,0.0004638027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889946,0.00033802656,0.00006755488,0.000039597893,0.00044107603,0.00021428641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011847189,0.00048610524,0.00034611073,0.0008488412,0.014897068,0.007011444,0.0012015713,0.0050683306,0.08437743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004922291,0.00062373123,0.00043790697,0.0008479163,0.0029794772,0.0027606585,0.0024636972,0.0059407847,0.017629072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021575303,0.0000109666125,0.0005811532,0.000048518792,0.000004256637,0.0001401193,0.0011216961,0.000026658894,0.00014309713,0.07078587,0.9164824,0.010633732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000524718,0.0000069669672,0.001616505,0.00014822076,0.0000043795985,0.00006399284,0.0014530824,0.00004254841,0.00018491196,0.0036250527,0.9928323,0.000016832324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60829437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8243635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39170563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012297531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01569081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7880249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246255457","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14668155.v1","title":"First occupants: the erosion of indigenous sovereignty through legal narratives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Autonomy; State (computer science); Politics; Narrative; Self-determination; Political science; Law; Indigenous rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.03464240055028516,"score_gpt":0.31573160308809217,"score_spread":0.281089202537807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246255457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8568433,0.0016030753,0.0028886993,0.009935963,0.000054040265,0.000030379275,0.00006356595,0.00002395565,0.12855703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996084,0.00025392944,0.00021071314,0.00014160931,0.0000069467164,0.0000040946047,0.000010044817,0.000008900012,0.0032797966],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962585,0.0016935511,0.00008424725,0.00031883307,0.0007711336,0.0008738463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99306583,0.0042692856,0.0008096687,0.0005508559,0.0007887825,0.00051564764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005126535,0.00027195955,0.00030570631,0.0018571732,0.01859084,0.014017123,0.0014983831,0.0015167125,0.0032290174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012156214,0.00036548285,0.00019422446,0.0014827393,0.042490937,0.0057917973,0.007217929,0.0031529465,0.000190922],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000899575,0.0000051612105,0.002989709,0.000020290106,0.000002735961,0.0003446686,0.9011934,0.00005407827,0.00020730853,0.09034595,0.0006372658,0.004190502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044196936,0.000009818001,0.006038134,0.00021845837,0.000015046295,0.00028893875,0.9070722,0.00045957716,0.0006206917,0.022965115,0.062276114,0.00003161507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57093716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65256274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57093716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02349847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01828651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8631793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248196157","doi":"10.1386/public_00009_7","title":"Biometric Aesthetics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Biometrics; Eugenics; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Photography; Identification (biology); Reading (process); Galton's problem; Diversity (politics); Aesthetics; Biometric data; Epistemology; Computer science; Visual arts; Social science; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Art; Artificial intelligence; Anthropology; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.07288829630401826,"score_gpt":0.30037876937502994,"score_spread":0.22749047307101167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248196157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005570447,0.0038328946,0.020092187,0.02692921,0.0015100563,0.000025161426,0.000112858856,0.00016382747,0.94176334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7337784,0.0048000845,0.012975298,0.011736284,0.003044405,0.00020458622,0.00024301242,0.00044795588,0.23276986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99264,0.0034151133,0.00023600085,0.0008726376,0.002349397,0.00048697903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970324,0.0011200024,0.0002728888,0.00075400283,0.00059654895,0.00022420328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047002947,0.0008255363,0.0003794511,0.0023068893,0.0058082733,0.011930436,0.0011510404,0.0035245589,0.021973355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008940815,0.00032946287,0.00056740927,0.0014000762,0.02678849,0.007145745,0.0054310192,0.0040684137,0.0050997892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004765291,0.0000028650911,0.000055543547,0.000011614215,0.0000011145249,0.000024637828,0.0014335886,0.000057135065,0.00007063209,0.98574084,0.007096856,0.0055004507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006911147,0.000014402694,0.00026852917,0.00011959621,0.000003753686,0.00047061528,0.0021724403,0.00057894015,0.00018893702,0.48737332,0.5087845,0.00001809941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023589446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015284489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021973355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048266193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014204078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07350814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248591544","doi":"10.1353/ctr.0.0027","title":"Cultural Memory and the Law in George F. Walker and Dani Romain's This Is Wonderland","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Allusion; Character (mathematics); Carnivalesque; Art; Performance art; Law; Art history; Literature; Humanities; History; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010762595312061482,"score_gpt":0.2622289288481993,"score_spread":0.25146633353613784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248591544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052494284,0.19639744,0.00045346818,0.24163169,0.0015966572,0.000016080769,0.00008045669,0.000028851016,0.50730103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8435875,0.055711012,0.00022009449,0.0149207655,0.00074326893,0.000020968493,0.00002937861,0.000039962226,0.084727004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990087,0.0005662587,0.000017426715,0.000050223913,0.00015985286,0.00019768055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864966,0.0007938526,0.00011777575,0.00005282757,0.0001927326,0.0001932015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015767862,0.00016086854,0.00023360779,0.0011559603,0.007733793,0.006574656,0.0006054761,0.0018015852,0.0051688394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030768057,0.00014567174,0.000104850275,0.0014355158,0.012753922,0.0026781312,0.0016911986,0.0020932269,0.00026629018],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003338157,0.000020019612,0.0008526128,0.00014561585,0.0000060241136,0.00044810385,0.06979393,0.00008441265,0.00013524939,0.70336914,0.18138883,0.043722715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008879739,0.000010528159,0.0028699653,0.00051984197,0.000006537525,0.00023119249,0.0592762,0.00003962796,0.00015449256,0.035793312,0.90107167,0.000017787384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3304121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56682307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6695879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010608347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008505651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6569778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248798288","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.2.185","title":"TOWARD A STUDY OF THE ECOLOGY OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Political science; Environmentalism; Sociology; Law; Biology; Politics","score_opus":0.017134776734915192,"score_gpt":0.25195240689489146,"score_spread":0.23481763015997625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248798288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52630776,0.009987913,0.009794668,0.062468972,0.00012129731,0.000069465925,0.00076124084,0.000053012605,0.3904357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99342525,0.0012805834,0.00068103045,0.0004943035,0.00005092131,0.000021208909,0.000060206596,0.000020796886,0.0039657727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883753,0.000569718,0.00001802399,0.00015126086,0.00014938274,0.00027406367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99406815,0.0033910146,0.000722406,0.000330717,0.000570415,0.00091733027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014177279,0.00016570395,0.00039577982,0.003021333,0.0037892647,0.009851595,0.0013525732,0.0021368994,0.013875721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084312,0.0003713192,0.00017677632,0.0043844865,0.01730012,0.0076944274,0.0020281186,0.0015003198,0.0007191018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057874182,0.00017683087,0.07190421,0.00012953371,0.00003119364,0.00018632658,0.01735584,0.0013747307,0.00050348445,0.8622095,0.0071863313,0.03888416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004349091,0.00008072696,0.21655269,0.00034612924,0.000029927602,0.00024856933,0.114855394,0.0057558045,0.00043782446,0.56885153,0.09276257,0.00003544885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08988691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17344883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08988691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008630442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00586617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17872739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249935794","doi":"10.3138/utlj.59.3.381","title":"FREEDOM, LAW, AND NAKED VIOLENCE: A REPLY TO KRAMER","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Clearance; Law; Independence (probability theory); Power (physics); Position (finance); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Epistemology; Mathematics; Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.007710817025249586,"score_gpt":0.2358381702143783,"score_spread":0.22812735318912872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249935794","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040644254,0.011342061,0.00056386326,0.969125,0.0012319213,0.000003357128,0.000016124623,0.0000108302165,0.013642454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42244938,0.024925048,0.0014083162,0.5026075,0.010558224,0.00004435626,0.000023028166,0.000086404936,0.03789779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667215,0.0016335733,0.00013988612,0.0004250093,0.00075803173,0.0003713929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98919964,0.008768302,0.00058057613,0.00027982675,0.0007489323,0.0004227761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004383858,0.00034016772,0.00069477246,0.00095004216,0.007977105,0.006788996,0.002062191,0.01890221,0.0029044142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013621803,0.000517286,0.00032507893,0.0013358517,0.03363408,0.012088887,0.0043187565,0.01598548,0.00063263497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026205353,0.000016751605,0.00028245457,0.00007494672,0.0000055936725,0.00020326229,0.01266896,0.00016567255,0.000056714875,0.723349,0.25567657,0.0074739195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027541439,0.000024656974,0.0011230998,0.00047251538,0.000014132206,0.00033885837,0.020373128,0.0004968134,0.00032362196,0.5016509,0.47508445,0.00007023522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0256176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035835665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0256176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008056628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060902378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05845517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250255720","doi":"10.1017/9781316471203","title":"The Unsteady State","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Jurisprudence; Norm (philosophy); Law; State (computer science); Legal norm; Perspective (graphical); State law; Object (grammar); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics; Computer science; Statute; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.024174853489156514,"score_gpt":0.2409141391636192,"score_spread":0.21673928567446268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250255720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03913206,0.0040655825,0.08416956,0.035695788,0.0006484022,0.000080845275,0.00013861229,0.0002077032,0.8358615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92685556,0.0020168766,0.011752949,0.004093883,0.00030042575,0.00021953326,0.00012392609,0.00014620554,0.05449066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964849,0.0013261512,0.00013179037,0.0008306657,0.0009089903,0.00031753923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970387,0.0011803304,0.0002100277,0.0009200795,0.00044718952,0.00020378688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003433865,0.0003169925,0.00042476592,0.0011032053,0.004153259,0.009372637,0.0010751146,0.002542435,0.005734959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006868821,0.00031713245,0.0004935568,0.0008465605,0.03723052,0.011211956,0.0067043398,0.0056327777,0.0010420672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012113303,0.0000016312097,0.00003789435,0.000004639272,5.655343e-7,0.000008940521,0.00060345966,0.000041450498,0.000024851604,0.9974241,0.0004934799,0.0013577499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025354589,0.0000061878904,0.00008098522,0.000029014884,0.0000015368996,0.00004438305,0.00070653314,0.00036487222,0.000088050496,0.96243364,0.03623802,0.0000042159454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002135968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017241061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009372637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034471818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051888586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025011122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250496700","doi":"10.3138/cjccj.2017-0035.r1","title":"The Role of Defendant Race and Racially Charged Media in Canadian Mock Juror Decision-Making","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Criminology; Psychology; Law; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.04645856666486119,"score_gpt":0.31603708891982235,"score_spread":0.26957852225496115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250496700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9776948,0.0010673977,0.00013887217,0.0035882513,0.00008191506,0.000039690334,0.0002864307,0.0000063462217,0.017096287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99743015,0.00046342044,0.00014873601,0.00022845315,0.000028198081,0.000012625968,0.000105861924,0.000009888957,0.001572735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99604285,0.0010863304,0.00017398664,0.00027723133,0.001370206,0.0010494769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9527542,0.026937438,0.0042548925,0.00085471093,0.0101150265,0.0050836815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065258434,0.00031806808,0.0004914325,0.0024381552,0.0069600046,0.005219039,0.001894337,0.0021045012,0.0092083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08180717,0.000499254,0.0005873524,0.0017586623,0.0028297822,0.0014355506,0.0016547912,0.0018929556,0.0004953225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030577485,0.0006424771,0.9011684,0.00014824152,0.0002282661,0.00064364076,0.024151174,0.0007707531,0.00094881124,0.004565975,0.007596019,0.056078576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007045533,0.00007386923,0.97459716,0.0001904554,0.00027027068,0.00014349562,0.017269487,0.0010217415,0.00030034303,0.0014670658,0.004495427,0.0001002885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9590291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9851665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04097092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024921197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0566774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18081677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250554708","doi":"10.4324/9781315582207-28","title":"The Troubled Relationship of Feminist and Queer Legal Theory to Strategic Essentialism: Theory/Praxis, Queer Porn, and Canadian Anti-discrimination Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Queer theory; Queer; Essentialism; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02513221635338979,"score_gpt":0.2745201000147231,"score_spread":0.2493878836613333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250554708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027633406,0.0139510445,0.0074278656,0.15227397,0.0007441837,0.00004672212,0.0001669597,0.00006441089,0.7976914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84837484,0.0058268746,0.0027228743,0.011528706,0.00036387972,0.000061622406,0.000065689674,0.00015028991,0.13090524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969267,0.0009260746,0.000051006184,0.00031398673,0.0008840711,0.0008982013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963224,0.0022265792,0.000121335164,0.00023326752,0.0007014001,0.00039509012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005214498,0.0005305313,0.0005724901,0.0022675388,0.018498998,0.01266489,0.0021930565,0.0046335543,0.008493436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055697346,0.00039292686,0.00039519544,0.0033429672,0.0958861,0.0078023006,0.0029903685,0.009130964,0.00042291448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010810259,0.0000025694903,0.000029790142,0.0000050364247,3.1196555e-7,0.0000064796764,0.0037490516,0.000022400138,0.000008590598,0.9921029,0.0026557995,0.001415941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007844031,0.0000042614565,0.00048855843,0.00011962641,0.000003193319,0.000031352887,0.013253888,0.00022325873,0.000102032674,0.84478927,0.14096096,0.000015808188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8388888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8996144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16111118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06460623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09196179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46875316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250662728","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14664618.v1","title":"Exploring the language of death with dignity: a comparative and critical content analysis of Canadian news editorials","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Dignity; Newspaper; Death with dignity; Assisted suicide; Content analysis; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Political science; History; Social science","score_opus":0.269844477680784,"score_gpt":0.3715652808885003,"score_spread":0.10172080320771631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250662728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87109214,0.009207298,0.0010049349,0.015038364,0.0008175999,0.00049797393,0.00080795353,0.00004655057,0.10148719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894795,0.0033475042,0.00094499247,0.0014130765,0.00026394293,0.00022156321,0.00028124728,0.000064508284,0.0039835293],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.962318,0.014885266,0.0017147573,0.0018789348,0.015677134,0.0035258534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75961447,0.1508817,0.02006128,0.0026355998,0.061897602,0.004909378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030956142,0.0008027618,0.0009803192,0.03330519,0.025481127,0.020829864,0.0024387504,0.0023693172,0.0030628315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13708977,0.00064028276,0.00045353232,0.03202476,0.019856844,0.0064270217,0.005320236,0.0030617162,0.00024917882],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060750914,0.000018430472,0.004454241,0.0005541886,0.000015482377,0.00043818066,0.97779363,0.000025359648,0.00031923043,0.0064577744,0.0023377493,0.007525007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009486329,0.000021428641,0.021569472,0.0010938429,0.000040979437,0.000099260375,0.9231022,0.00009984949,0.00023985242,0.0006394431,0.053041544,0.000042662945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7395234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80433667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2604766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1275074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09153395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9251353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251171017","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2556261","title":"Human Rights and the Forgotten Acts of Meaning in the Social Conventions of Conceptual Jurisprudence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Jurisprudence; Human rights; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02645952452242856,"score_gpt":0.3256886784158281,"score_spread":0.29922915389339955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251171017","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12467508,0.009173593,0.14284144,0.12443821,0.0011573278,0.00014949893,0.0001723588,0.00016186116,0.5972307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823945,0.0005432586,0.009345018,0.0019532186,0.0002962325,0.00011730392,0.000028445655,0.00008457179,0.0052373605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95249367,0.037051763,0.001417667,0.0032332886,0.0041646734,0.0016389777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9538192,0.03340753,0.0022029465,0.007145103,0.002282704,0.0011425086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040800866,0.0006544986,0.0013795294,0.0032948705,0.011163505,0.021258913,0.0032010772,0.012011045,0.0033651812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05384876,0.0011065513,0.00096454576,0.0026906608,0.20415018,0.023903716,0.008735337,0.015484388,0.00047327406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019863044,0.0000019497404,0.00002496208,0.0000042730426,0.0000012569134,0.0000066459584,0.0039653527,0.000047301044,0.000021345031,0.9954438,0.00012803807,0.00035308776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008207857,0.0000028540912,0.00006075309,0.000024253759,0.0000020864634,0.000012368862,0.0009448461,0.00014741061,0.00004084565,0.99491274,0.0038363882,0.0000072716675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074586524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00660379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040800866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009061256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008796882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21577817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251388779","doi":"10.1017/s0038713400007697","title":"Barbara K. Altmann and Carleton W. Carroll, eds., The Court Reconvenes: Courtly Literature across the Disciplines. Selected papers from the Ninth Triennial Congress of the International Courtly Literature Society, University of British Columbia, 25–31 July 1998. Woodbridge, Eng., and Rochester, N.Y.: Boydell and Brewer, 2003. Pp. x, 370; black-and-white figures. $85.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Speculum","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ninth; History; Classics; Media studies; Literature; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.004546202009122605,"score_gpt":0.21471067300682237,"score_spread":0.21016447099769975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251388779","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001584244,0.96546626,0.00042692552,0.011465113,0.0024695632,0.000009897644,0.00018320733,0.000042412274,0.019778196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021501493,0.96022224,0.0006731936,0.0011848246,0.001702919,0.00001804994,0.0001926627,0.00004519942,0.033810645],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993693,0.000121335834,0.00005903581,0.00008295821,0.00030921877,0.00005803829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985279,0.0006058349,0.00018047304,0.00004557706,0.00042894058,0.00021126095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015952195,0.0022372503,0.0013718714,0.0045586904,0.0016799035,0.004671825,0.0015385147,0.0021914763,0.044253193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029756394,0.0015142505,0.00043209715,0.0063551217,0.0017423508,0.008863451,0.0015876831,0.0023739033,0.030951291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002418999,0.0000152008415,0.00016825629,0.00058712316,0.000007750447,0.000036322795,0.0004780799,0.00006765674,0.00005758663,0.0037750893,0.8774753,0.117307335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066868374,0.0000075795574,0.0013997606,0.002255884,0.00002552805,0.0002467222,0.00082165236,0.00008140947,0.00011946474,0.0063105063,0.9887094,0.00001540391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042164847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09402599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044253193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022920356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041101715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14804173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251464530","doi":"10.32376/3f8575cb.87215e85","title":"“Do I Look Like My Selfie?”: Filters and the Digital-Forensic Gaze","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"mediastudies.press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; The King's University; Western University","funders":"Concordia University; King's University College","keywords":"Selfie; Gaze; Computer science; Computer graphics (images); Computer vision; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.030058482508351133,"score_gpt":0.251496709214656,"score_spread":0.22143822670630486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251464530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7266936,0.0040092724,0.008768179,0.014431033,0.00018574791,0.000053211326,0.0001129568,0.000113527014,0.24563254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99164295,0.0005134172,0.0007374638,0.000624582,0.00003470989,0.000015486461,0.000015948324,0.0000325036,0.0063829357],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997672,0.0015899469,0.00004906464,0.00023784142,0.00028354884,0.00016758605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99419034,0.0041832407,0.0007059252,0.0003899914,0.00032254672,0.00020797792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029002745,0.00023595734,0.00015116498,0.0020046378,0.004026882,0.0051130285,0.00041871984,0.0014848701,0.004645672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01087356,0.00018415469,0.00015903424,0.0009264717,0.011376474,0.006749281,0.0032641585,0.0013065634,0.00047066016],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008941796,0.000036228765,0.013823937,0.0001538053,0.000017470185,0.0007781429,0.8465343,0.00006546713,0.0036850385,0.07828986,0.005113611,0.051412735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000122152505,0.00006254001,0.029987736,0.0005562252,0.000025451289,0.001533161,0.79184926,0.00046725068,0.0026720858,0.03402827,0.1387508,0.00005503348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051393914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007499928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051393914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020295833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059606857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015541315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251706100","doi":"10.33137/caribbeanquilt.v1i0.19044","title":"63 Beach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Caribbean Quilt","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.030524508721635445,"score_gpt":0.31057378431447824,"score_spread":0.2800492755928428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251706100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00064191764,0.0023503234,0.00028524993,0.0035827865,0.001171997,0.00003324923,0.0005797929,0.00026503633,0.9910896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008323962,0.00035824513,0.000063039486,0.00018605731,0.000038863545,0.0000038343774,0.00006243364,0.000048469385,0.9984066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997322,0.000023965027,0.000008640955,0.000061600505,0.000121381054,0.0000521512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948895,0.00004266649,0.000018188297,0.000054103544,0.00026143825,0.00013460922],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028629016,0.00073698885,0.00028856078,0.0013686215,0.005476417,0.0034296564,0.0006611018,0.0015883422,0.67419904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000935877,0.00046227034,0.000313571,0.001546407,0.0007115765,0.001496097,0.0018675134,0.0013139786,0.30575225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000111054605,0.000009728235,0.00012704097,0.000046136858,0.0000011624861,0.00005591469,0.00024655383,0.000029986631,0.00017397279,0.00781971,0.9491748,0.042303815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.7904e-7,0.0000021909232,0.00023778867,0.000023208977,7.6290115e-7,0.000017499802,0.00018393048,0.000010460018,0.000031973792,0.00024120689,0.9992483,0.0000016872438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12307929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45117143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32580096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035174284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027272059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252157547","doi":"10.1386/macp.11.1.105_1","title":"Tabloid journalism and philosophical discourses surrounding the right to privacy and press freedom","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sheridan College","funders":"","keywords":"Journalism; Freedom of the press; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.046426868336024885,"score_gpt":0.35068216660706686,"score_spread":0.304255298271042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252157547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09065411,0.007570225,0.030183852,0.26033515,0.0026194078,0.000058514895,0.0001837535,0.00008418843,0.6083108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754519,0.0014894338,0.0021759355,0.009772139,0.0014643851,0.00006226219,0.000043057935,0.00009286315,0.009448115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810111,0.014217123,0.00070189836,0.001179406,0.0018559095,0.0010346043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9008098,0.08627735,0.003480922,0.0043145707,0.003415451,0.0017018863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025811806,0.00040687982,0.00060276873,0.004165386,0.009555846,0.028142689,0.0016233557,0.010893857,0.011055668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05571822,0.0006347032,0.00055478147,0.0041580405,0.08388806,0.024234103,0.007300428,0.012089048,0.00083403377],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001644288,0.0000069429325,0.00006767579,0.000026577594,0.0000021041226,0.00003062346,0.013428016,0.000038520404,0.00006339824,0.9844396,0.0009304548,0.0009497094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003983248,0.000016968956,0.0003637546,0.00034113444,0.000013701037,0.000101413505,0.021026945,0.00040393037,0.00037222813,0.9141552,0.06314195,0.000022892855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035413457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002317276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028142689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066429726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036569075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13650751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252409533","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139083614","title":"Laughing at the Gods","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Hubris; Law; Test (biology); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02542599690894288,"score_gpt":0.23383136097915394,"score_spread":0.20840536407021107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252409533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026858384,0.026284603,0.004992586,0.24924509,0.04721701,0.00006253959,0.00020277558,0.00081784365,0.6684918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018174544,0.0037886347,0.0014465201,0.04295928,0.0054690167,0.00003588834,0.00006704588,0.0005340625,0.92752504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982023,0.0005693999,0.000041076455,0.00026339458,0.0007202507,0.0002035734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997408,0.00084253575,0.00014826989,0.00029868362,0.00081196125,0.00049053784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001975525,0.0010356811,0.000626233,0.0010075378,0.0077476874,0.007250127,0.0010875507,0.0035320644,0.052014235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008584868,0.0004330414,0.0006682503,0.00064971304,0.008935729,0.009760675,0.005053185,0.0110349115,0.029591687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016996803,0.000009454428,0.00012220915,0.000051474035,0.000004483152,0.000093665636,0.0043036197,0.000030928826,0.0001738235,0.09185578,0.885101,0.018236533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001754006,0.0000058787627,0.00008407968,0.000060005314,0.0000014823383,0.000077607634,0.0014576057,0.000029686007,0.000057194487,0.0059047868,0.992315,0.000004920193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054992614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010829993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052014235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031261528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019915968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17400491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252645446","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511751004","title":"Cultural Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural heritage; Indigenous; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; International law; History","score_opus":0.020699092074487304,"score_gpt":0.23586394336592267,"score_spread":0.21516485129143537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252645446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008793851,0.008921421,0.0018288745,0.008962588,0.00083602953,0.00002948566,0.000042006242,0.000035630044,0.9784646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10887711,0.013494123,0.0028011461,0.01177351,0.001260634,0.00018743731,0.00014507187,0.00013560877,0.8613254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821246,0.00071477424,0.00005891334,0.00027236188,0.00054495985,0.00019648665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991078,0.00039241964,0.0000557524,0.00018837317,0.00017477153,0.000080939215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012534842,0.000611976,0.0004192047,0.0008046834,0.00501221,0.008059143,0.0010256047,0.0031895542,0.0202599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031726947,0.00023545371,0.00030264547,0.000944385,0.013929096,0.004745731,0.0033986352,0.004151078,0.0051563736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018472281,0.000005183684,0.000045191064,0.000034189878,0.0000013046721,0.000036269987,0.0024006104,0.000043086224,0.00003557644,0.9256464,0.05599704,0.01575321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002278219,0.0000041501225,0.00009961416,0.0002119067,0.0000014701842,0.000077735036,0.0012468533,0.000050020837,0.000057945443,0.11247651,0.88576806,0.0000035072476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071209334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009206346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0202599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056687174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053236843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067776084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252706341","doi":"10.15353/cgjsc.v4i1.3745","title":"Truth-Telling by Wrong-Doers? The Construction of Avowal in Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Graduate Journal of Sociology and Criminology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Confession (law); Law; Truth telling; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.12723796416017139,"score_gpt":0.28029980446471014,"score_spread":0.15306184030453876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252706341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11188283,0.0042821495,0.016218523,0.12505949,0.00068822235,0.00013870512,0.00029473513,0.00013362123,0.7413017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9543662,0.0008768306,0.0030122048,0.007525084,0.00008270621,0.00003914776,0.000048184807,0.00007766862,0.03397203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905539,0.0020281114,0.00020981203,0.0012061144,0.0027901642,0.0032118529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903662,0.002959992,0.0006403923,0.0007960281,0.003760931,0.0014764701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006387095,0.00040764365,0.0005704723,0.0021048528,0.038333803,0.020814264,0.0022661316,0.006672729,0.006821435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018465454,0.00060484686,0.0005368845,0.0030212568,0.048383467,0.008139162,0.0068294476,0.01037586,0.000477791],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058185196,0.0000039240826,0.0005922307,0.000010505937,0.0000033133897,0.00015641602,0.017138856,0.0000903034,0.000040234907,0.9744082,0.0048321947,0.0027178477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031229898,0.00001885831,0.0044534616,0.00045144674,0.000060466366,0.00034028728,0.07168617,0.0019763736,0.00076657214,0.44622678,0.47378114,0.00020721692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9654277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9729691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8601636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13983636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16363412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254242263","doi":"10.1017/9780511762116.009","title":"Victimology","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Culpability; Blame; Criminology; Causation; Psychology; Criminal justice; Victimology; Subject (documents); Political science; Social psychology; Law; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Child abuse; Medicine","score_opus":0.020507571451876382,"score_gpt":0.22098769538291413,"score_spread":0.20048012393103776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254242263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002670836,0.051067006,0.0045797797,0.006625574,0.0032745714,0.000072389084,0.00006565373,0.00009019325,0.9315541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.119661175,0.07879076,0.004820963,0.01008819,0.0036187975,0.0003248801,0.00030127194,0.0003160917,0.78207797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870753,0.0005836655,0.00005655276,0.00020487787,0.00028964248,0.00015765261],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994821,0.0001764521,0.000042860036,0.000108894405,0.0001142919,0.0000754758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010869364,0.0007300917,0.0006525024,0.0022306056,0.003556446,0.0061913584,0.0020054823,0.00309695,0.032791615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017792162,0.00030133058,0.00045491417,0.0015162266,0.009424783,0.0065432126,0.004365034,0.00358852,0.009120314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000129763175,0.000035328027,0.00021489877,0.00023956365,0.0000040372947,0.00024628118,0.0063213217,0.00005596685,0.00017506923,0.88005257,0.05171243,0.060929473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002831744,0.000015217842,0.00016095095,0.00037298226,0.0000025690913,0.00057828345,0.0020689971,0.000028375956,0.00009973173,0.058794796,0.93787026,0.0000050108706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013299488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015115164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032791615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028916013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018531239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10969889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254938739","doi":"10.3176/tr.2012.4.05","title":"HOW DO VIOLATIONS OF PRIVACY AND MORAL AUTONOMY THREATEN THE BASIS OF OUR DEMOCRACY?; pp. 369–381","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trames Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"123 Certification (Canada)","funders":"FP7 Research Potential of Convergence Regions; European Commission","keywords":"Autonomy; Democracy; Political science; Law and economics; Basis (linear algebra); Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08285837707081713,"score_gpt":0.3079636936718531,"score_spread":0.225105316601036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254938739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06308089,0.015410943,0.007730668,0.43536404,0.0016108968,0.000041176274,0.00006658154,0.000049443155,0.4766453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9631366,0.0039216485,0.00089485996,0.012894565,0.0006995412,0.000043714823,0.000013094064,0.000037282774,0.018358683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940889,0.0040539866,0.000092750495,0.0004844046,0.0006881476,0.00059176533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634737,0.0021786478,0.00045341314,0.0003506789,0.00038437138,0.00028558337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059179096,0.00032014868,0.00033712198,0.0006734517,0.0077192825,0.013786552,0.0008914686,0.0051536225,0.00450234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008248485,0.00024106335,0.00039908467,0.0007320295,0.057055667,0.0103775645,0.0036668219,0.007955045,0.00067764777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012002538,0.000014295866,0.000852056,0.000022130936,0.00000884804,0.000115966766,0.017601445,0.00014648464,0.00006972092,0.9581501,0.013594862,0.00941215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000101637015,0.000019438403,0.0026212297,0.00022922711,0.000008291528,0.00018608183,0.026303133,0.00056284154,0.00021479948,0.7952383,0.17457837,0.000028020655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008762966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009534371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013786552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071909963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038786854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052174628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255049333","doi":"10.1017/9781108688949.005","title":"The Parody/Satire Dichotomy in American Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Law; Copyright law; Art; Political science; Internet privacy; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.01822022269598394,"score_gpt":0.23133942039170227,"score_spread":0.21311919769571833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255049333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067339092,0.00802118,0.0011003425,0.018026063,0.00031282872,0.0000066280554,0.00001836942,0.000030558334,0.9657502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.685393,0.008063065,0.001373279,0.0128177265,0.0009135617,0.00006489775,0.000045899087,0.00007109396,0.2912576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989002,0.0004465383,0.000020760384,0.0001050191,0.00035197308,0.000175519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999508,0.00030011538,0.000027634786,0.000052878222,0.00006334588,0.00004798637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001211127,0.000227488,0.00024994762,0.0007019068,0.004327991,0.00465119,0.0005331399,0.0027190633,0.007362612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020006562,0.00018859432,0.00021777395,0.0009535013,0.013154786,0.0039042854,0.0014762292,0.004804654,0.0012667321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021337519,0.000003706563,0.000030051391,0.000007927683,3.3458375e-7,0.000009835366,0.0010056396,0.000017377837,0.000024072819,0.98327845,0.0097113205,0.0059090876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007162109,0.000009783216,0.00057928055,0.00015144359,0.0000038031433,0.00007067319,0.0016284703,0.0002757923,0.00010809466,0.6855868,0.31156838,0.000010271739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0083757555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014441675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0083757555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003907413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030922412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028350413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255147956","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511777486.015","title":"Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Pound (networking); Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Duty; nobody; Political science; History","score_opus":0.02175363187048057,"score_gpt":0.22090982706041848,"score_spread":0.1991561951899379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255147956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007544669,0.0049709845,0.00075772224,0.0066215033,0.00079384755,0.00002263129,0.000112417925,0.00004798621,0.9859184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025947303,0.0021390163,0.00042631,0.0066786376,0.00029571351,0.000053523545,0.00009804713,0.000046873847,0.96431476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989851,0.00020218539,0.000036531503,0.00020919173,0.00035539604,0.00021158093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999526,0.00015035585,0.000023133827,0.000057638084,0.00018284953,0.00005994693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093308266,0.0005080713,0.00026508444,0.0009823196,0.00513161,0.005723953,0.00074936857,0.0037523517,0.06930651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022463044,0.00029321373,0.0002654061,0.0007231888,0.0048490735,0.0034832587,0.0022545282,0.004336918,0.01690296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058365085,0.000011612398,0.00008749126,0.000027826693,0.0000010602305,0.00007159929,0.00122907,0.00004553324,0.0000859944,0.75924116,0.22027743,0.018915445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017127519,0.000004499806,0.00012372591,0.00008087529,7.3888e-7,0.00004028001,0.00031905298,0.000027111306,0.000057442547,0.022846464,0.9764955,0.000002541736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026858356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037919443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06930651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007643479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043423222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255661804","doi":"10.24908/iqurcp.8283","title":"Inglorious Judgment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Joke; Fantasy; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Movie theater; White (mutation); Drama; Aesthetics; Law; Sociology; Art; History; Media studies; Literature; Political science","score_opus":0.13037347232657728,"score_gpt":0.4025147911722653,"score_spread":0.27214131884568804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255661804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025272304,0.006698519,0.0048898403,0.12033422,0.02036426,0.000086595086,0.00014968298,0.00029009912,0.84465957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07586412,0.003388089,0.0028984766,0.09458532,0.007978188,0.00012377433,0.00017574843,0.0004780496,0.8145082],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921619,0.0024975517,0.00035344562,0.0015876587,0.0025692722,0.00083016686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99123317,0.0032187286,0.0004449243,0.0012326821,0.002871186,0.0009994181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004453846,0.00086504786,0.00042493158,0.001235788,0.011072693,0.012637444,0.0017174222,0.005316604,0.06308767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026122553,0.00043500768,0.0004966569,0.00078381214,0.009140469,0.007832131,0.0056166295,0.00980808,0.022724206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019100007,0.000018393803,0.00015149282,0.0000570513,0.0000044687436,0.00015276503,0.0043914644,0.000035873018,0.00026584798,0.24595952,0.7253326,0.023611452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002307204,0.000004747015,0.00010789236,0.000071039285,0.000001516304,0.00005580001,0.0016735599,0.000043437907,0.000101612255,0.012618124,0.9853137,0.000006163509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008859456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017799063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06308767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00552198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051859403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21104926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255797834","doi":"10.22215/etd/2011-07225","title":"Publics in the making : a genealogical inquiry into the discursive publics of Japanese Canadian redress","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Publics; Redress; Political science; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.06427989508488093,"score_gpt":0.34475546824098025,"score_spread":0.28047557315609933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255797834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8066408,0.0008946218,0.00088400056,0.009700708,0.000054916905,0.000028237922,0.00024971063,0.000021639042,0.18152536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943678,0.00021033344,0.000091597394,0.00011759477,0.0000071909844,0.00000517045,0.000023432445,0.000010276591,0.0051665767],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979937,0.0004080521,0.000049456492,0.00020370018,0.00047578925,0.0008692812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933329,0.0023556063,0.0009633653,0.00043470133,0.0020948937,0.0008184818],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027399384,0.00017353089,0.00028248562,0.0046439045,0.021276178,0.0073941443,0.0012175529,0.0009853533,0.0056904834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010942234,0.0002837708,0.00016440618,0.008325092,0.018028723,0.004394138,0.0037895937,0.0016214226,0.00017675593],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004658562,0.000020522466,0.021186052,0.00004141827,0.000009087737,0.00038432446,0.6632624,0.0001935836,0.00024517512,0.2955034,0.0044660205,0.014641434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013376921,0.000018837514,0.06760119,0.00018992876,0.00006094148,0.0001821333,0.760117,0.00084456464,0.00034084628,0.022639548,0.14792432,0.00006729858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9299382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9499218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9787238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05322997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036713522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3862123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256073112","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12480","title":"<i>Gender, Power and Representations in Cree Law</i> . By Emily Snyder. Vancouver. University of British Columbia Press, 2019. 248 pp. $34.95 paperback","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Power (physics); Law; Sociology; History; Media studies; Political science; Physics","score_opus":0.018356900243405673,"score_gpt":0.2552004891533458,"score_spread":0.23684358890994014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256073112","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012713137,0.93078566,0.00012182201,0.030468572,0.0071438593,0.000009379895,0.00016050907,0.000023982504,0.031159062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008694262,0.7507174,0.00024204254,0.014130687,0.0078003975,0.0000457113,0.0005145062,0.0000818783,0.21777305],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921274,0.00020056506,0.00003599969,0.00007615431,0.0003565183,0.00011802313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888533,0.00039187752,0.00011650718,0.0000438545,0.00040871647,0.00015385843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009622419,0.001132411,0.0009436358,0.0027935249,0.0020933843,0.0047077695,0.0010906325,0.0025357371,0.04422184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027567886,0.0006724771,0.00046254802,0.0051863785,0.00308826,0.0047037513,0.0018985972,0.0031450298,0.016089039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000838897,0.0000039682354,0.00008418909,0.0002517531,0.0000051063143,0.000012960394,0.00015950477,0.000015629477,0.0000237913,0.0026801026,0.96901345,0.027741067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042971783,0.000008125609,0.0013143906,0.0016205556,0.000008672364,0.00009745873,0.0007161387,0.00002095991,0.000035199795,0.0046390397,0.99152714,0.000007960804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097083144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23373944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90291685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004736277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043602763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19303614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256317025","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14668155","title":"First occupants: the erosion of indigenous sovereignty through legal narratives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Sovereignty; Indigenous; Autonomy; Politics; Narrative; State (computer science); Self-determination; Political science; Law; Indigenous rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.03464240055028516,"score_gpt":0.31573160308809217,"score_spread":0.281089202537807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256317025","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8568433,0.0016030753,0.0028886993,0.009935963,0.000054040265,0.000030379275,0.00006356595,0.00002395565,0.12855703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996084,0.00025392944,0.00021071314,0.00014160931,0.0000069467164,0.0000040946047,0.000010044817,0.000008900012,0.0032797966],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962585,0.0016935511,0.00008424725,0.00031883307,0.0007711336,0.0008738463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99306583,0.0042692856,0.0008096687,0.0005508559,0.0007887825,0.00051564764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005126535,0.00027195955,0.00030570631,0.0018571732,0.01859084,0.014017123,0.0014983831,0.0015167125,0.0032290174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012156214,0.00036548285,0.00019422446,0.0014827393,0.042490937,0.0057917973,0.007217929,0.0031529465,0.000190922],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000899575,0.0000051612105,0.002989709,0.000020290106,0.000002735961,0.0003446686,0.9011934,0.00005407827,0.00020730853,0.09034595,0.0006372658,0.004190502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044196936,0.000009818001,0.006038134,0.00021845837,0.000015046295,0.00028893875,0.9070722,0.00045957716,0.0006206917,0.022965115,0.062276114,0.00003161507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57093716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65256274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57093716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02349847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01828651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8631793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256667825","doi":"10.7202/1027341ar","title":"Jacques Deslauriers, Loi sur la faillite et l’insolvabilité. Législation, jurisprudence et doctrine. Collection Alter Ego, 4 édition, Montréal, Wilson &amp; Lafleur, 2004, 1120 pages, ISBN 2-89127-643-4 Patrick A. Molinari (dir.), Dialogues about Justice: The Public, Legislators, Courts and the Media / Dialogues sur la justice : le public, le législateur, les tribunaux et les médias, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2003, 428 pages, ISBN 2-89400-179-7 Marie-Claude Prémont, Tropismes du droit. Logique métaphorique et logique métonymique du langage juridique, Montréal, Liber, 2003, pages 186, ISBN 2-89578-032-3","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.017341713391803452,"score_gpt":0.23957978492511564,"score_spread":0.22223807153331218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256667825","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028108686,0.7802629,0.0015368535,0.10393695,0.00796194,0.000037896276,0.00047193657,0.00019784097,0.10531262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012155016,0.49397522,0.0023421664,0.02570069,0.008286384,0.00014581901,0.000525824,0.0004597959,0.45640916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974769,0.0006747389,0.00017075501,0.00033810834,0.0011015476,0.00023796322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976655,0.0011232441,0.00019737524,0.000090274865,0.0007124052,0.0002111844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022625378,0.0017165641,0.001179797,0.0031251425,0.004130938,0.006627622,0.0018842887,0.0055033863,0.06136936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044851727,0.0011325334,0.0006568716,0.003500696,0.0047114813,0.010130306,0.0025289466,0.0069677667,0.029685294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011800325,0.000010470792,0.00007791952,0.0002401329,0.0000053610092,0.000040609855,0.00094564835,0.000027201939,0.00008711921,0.02176531,0.9365453,0.040243175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052273194,0.0000041052244,0.00037314315,0.00031338577,0.000004089914,0.000080123114,0.00036984938,0.000019193345,0.000048170816,0.005450682,0.9933216,0.000010591588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11046249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18573263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8895375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010168842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009737635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21963906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281706444","doi":"10.4000/signata.4065","title":"Le « spectre » éthique du film comme phénomène de communication","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Signata","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des Laurentides","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.029012326526074838,"score_gpt":0.27747422275383243,"score_spread":0.2484618962277576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281706444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09606125,0.012958799,0.07304839,0.02737766,0.0014927844,0.00016022075,0.00023922596,0.00012845719,0.78853315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.912232,0.007920202,0.0089238975,0.0016254878,0.0010162023,0.00017559512,0.00013337353,0.00017065502,0.067802586],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99681324,0.0019535143,0.00008109383,0.00037286335,0.00055078865,0.00022853407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965785,0.0022574249,0.0002945426,0.00029493106,0.00037236768,0.0002022762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027039035,0.0006574393,0.00036768295,0.0016604547,0.0039017494,0.01062847,0.000831369,0.0016953221,0.0122690275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044041234,0.00029189832,0.0004318822,0.0011172721,0.013549047,0.010150955,0.0035609303,0.003680638,0.0010777259],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037244456,0.000015571026,0.0009160716,0.00030355543,0.000013636578,0.00026200362,0.08006828,0.00019752982,0.00185496,0.8961038,0.0032864858,0.016940799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003561669,0.00013779239,0.0078359675,0.0010509896,0.000048267753,0.0016381303,0.10448203,0.001389656,0.0030024555,0.24672963,0.6335759,0.00007352825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034186956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026033078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0122690275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034392527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015614488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041043937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282838719","doi":"10.3138/jcs-2021-0030","title":"When Victims Look like Criminals: Rehumanizing Victim Representation in Serial Killer Cases","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Framing (construction); Sociology; Media studies; Narrative; Globe; Gender studies; History; Criminology; Psychology; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.09630859001277049,"score_gpt":0.3516671465556934,"score_spread":0.25535855654292294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282838719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93939114,0.0013865589,0.0006666055,0.0082504675,0.00017649935,0.000057209763,0.000082417806,0.000022431199,0.04996663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939551,0.00072207424,0.00027285123,0.0011337652,0.00007585127,0.000017978733,0.000060549097,0.000030754716,0.0037310885],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934524,0.0034685854,0.00023667811,0.00039725148,0.00136785,0.001077255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898874,0.0043787668,0.0032984205,0.00065873854,0.0010956608,0.0006809786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043509975,0.0003906027,0.00029556573,0.0036834404,0.012569256,0.0076951627,0.0014082474,0.0017359979,0.005091036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024345418,0.0005232876,0.00019291053,0.0027494403,0.010391113,0.004098884,0.005568826,0.0026605634,0.0005138318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057892594,0.000033709315,0.027279327,0.00010788204,0.000013785427,0.0029659262,0.93620485,0.00002926535,0.0005990766,0.009447013,0.006143925,0.017117321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029171442,0.00001097405,0.014950343,0.00024360383,0.00001736901,0.0010680489,0.96092796,0.00007321753,0.00030077904,0.0011848591,0.021203564,0.000016308615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1330387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.261612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8669613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0083274655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046458817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26452863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287603056","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4257670","title":"WATCH The Silencing (2020) FULL MOVIE ONLINE FREE 123MOVIES wbk","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Psychology; Internet privacy; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.04585258390892899,"score_gpt":0.2680480498092346,"score_spread":0.2221954659003056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287603056","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012619946,0.00035308875,0.003608696,0.0007237994,0.001451147,0.00026126724,0.012406851,0.014396593,0.9655365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046686404,0.0003267773,0.0018883181,0.00061404245,0.00016097871,0.00016449647,0.008054565,0.0074973837,0.9766248],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998652,0.00000778814,0.000005671902,0.000023300237,0.00006725175,0.00003077964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948776,0.00005600781,0.0000121962275,0.00007930415,0.00022374428,0.0001410349],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020901438,0.0008005297,0.00037358224,0.00064360833,0.0012637886,0.0020816994,0.00093252043,0.0009828237,0.8768305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009990247,0.0005113503,0.0005820961,0.00043486778,0.00028787873,0.0018319843,0.0017590491,0.0013432404,0.7191315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003629994,0.000015145565,0.00006251406,0.0001089911,0.0000023325656,0.000035778867,0.000072878924,0.000036506364,0.00239637,0.0010381424,0.97279704,0.023398075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013886742,0.00001743541,0.00052185904,0.000041802086,0.0000042855,0.00006839056,0.000080401,0.0000935382,0.0019772886,0.00033239048,0.996837,0.000011634629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005248144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015761614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12316948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007789555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005577809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1756863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287626342","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4162485","title":"Body Dismemberment in Sexual Homicide Cases: Lust Murder or Rational Decision?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Dismemberment; Lust; Homicide; Criminology; Psychology; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medical emergency; Medicine; Political science; Law; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.059299168614443495,"score_gpt":0.3102141747157459,"score_spread":0.2509150061013024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287626342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979011,0.00016781839,0.00009047944,0.0004272936,0.0000071652958,0.000008737557,0.00001006794,0.0000017768429,0.0013856714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996798,0.00007306339,0.000052991712,0.000024807861,0.0000108467575,0.0000025839538,0.000011747193,8.9539026e-7,0.00014331308],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997322,0.0012589986,0.00023278316,0.00027738095,0.00035577107,0.00055315776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98571813,0.005136213,0.0070262477,0.00073637115,0.00033928468,0.001043902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027210799,0.00016630482,0.00027276168,0.0014994921,0.0009189774,0.0013161296,0.0005236521,0.0008446871,0.0038025826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028350653,0.00017698445,0.00023268904,0.00059783715,0.0023170377,0.001279319,0.0012962117,0.0010471577,0.0003400056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000159573,0.0002632583,0.9765869,0.000021091828,0.000016497825,0.0010709844,0.004575989,0.00009270683,0.00017048827,0.002189927,0.00018481984,0.014667729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011523637,0.00020725752,0.97183394,0.000092542556,0.00002272035,0.0045258068,0.017410325,0.0017066554,0.00037070469,0.0026440558,0.001152677,0.000021784655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026448811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00434879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038025826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005574121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000846254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014390647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287638553","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4100292","title":"Regarder ]]\"Code 8 (2019))\" FRANÇAIS FILM-STREAMING VF wdy","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Code (set theory); Computer science; Art; Operating system; Programming language","score_opus":0.04096851396021523,"score_gpt":0.260110068340415,"score_spread":0.21914155438019978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287638553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049490435,0.00018328558,0.0011780304,0.0013024732,0.0016487429,0.00020604463,0.01678281,0.011227373,0.96697634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002652436,0.00021142224,0.0010380113,0.00089789473,0.00016864749,0.00012789198,0.009854239,0.006968586,0.9780809],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993666,0.000057929472,0.000028363756,0.000076546516,0.0003177437,0.00015285777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977151,0.00014743526,0.00006628022,0.0003185692,0.0013524912,0.00040011297],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000736103,0.00089503516,0.0003166521,0.0013585376,0.0023458079,0.0046805562,0.0013682903,0.0016955853,0.8937226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003682317,0.0005406906,0.0005189721,0.001060263,0.00040371122,0.0043746955,0.0035458514,0.0018026739,0.8032898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011309557,0.0000056945246,0.00005310992,0.000033546326,5.279657e-7,0.000019107778,0.000067535446,0.0000074532854,0.00011265879,0.0012168983,0.98672473,0.011747396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037599,0.000002848083,0.00019247878,0.00003347182,4.4936445e-7,0.00002619263,0.00006754631,0.000015891681,0.000094775765,0.00010725396,0.99945015,0.000005089085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04222583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06864053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106277406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021092822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001413583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15159184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289780880","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12624","title":"How to not have to know: Legal technicalities and flagrant criminal offenses in Santiago, Chile","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Adjudication; Criminal justice; Bureaucracy; Criminal procedure; Criminology; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Unit (ring theory); Criminal court; Sociology; Psychology; International law","score_opus":0.03131377886287032,"score_gpt":0.3136607851965388,"score_spread":0.2823470063336685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289780880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96442276,0.0069558327,0.00014061107,0.0064466414,0.000025964708,0.00004550859,0.00007673078,0.000002201446,0.02188371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913748,0.006279412,0.00006299836,0.00040673304,0.000008352196,0.000032101107,0.00003937433,0.0000016784444,0.0017945594],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869055,0.00072111445,0.00005160987,0.0000894959,0.00020128247,0.0002458647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996327,0.0018591987,0.0010164166,0.00009112281,0.00039456855,0.0003116645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002311601,0.00015013487,0.00027651567,0.0014523634,0.002684425,0.0025280588,0.0007851963,0.00054183236,0.0028134156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062098643,0.00021154743,0.000105702165,0.002134562,0.0061709452,0.0016954165,0.0027881449,0.0013726,0.000087443696],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087705484,0.0003134971,0.21889086,0.0017720188,0.00005358022,0.0038840838,0.65749496,0.00024463065,0.0007218803,0.032667536,0.006927206,0.07694197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016297217,0.00005325642,0.24972066,0.0016277748,0.000020385301,0.0003443509,0.7136659,0.00013876751,0.00010592668,0.00218063,0.032105446,0.00002065341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16826223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29322806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16826223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077601727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009053985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3345657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289782256","doi":"10.7202/1091109ar","title":"Igniting Conciliation and Counting Coup as Redress: Red Reasoning in Tailfeathers, Johnson, and Lindberg","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Canadian Literature","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Lethbridge","keywords":"Conciliation; Redress; Law; Political science; Mediation","score_opus":0.018586935227757086,"score_gpt":0.30810749706540913,"score_spread":0.28952056183765207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289782256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06003953,0.026866958,0.015515984,0.28003952,0.0021415097,0.00019433809,0.00017372277,0.00011276683,0.61491567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.907733,0.0072516724,0.007940208,0.021279171,0.0003355898,0.00014092842,0.000046229557,0.00016066834,0.05511255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98757476,0.00676429,0.00036074506,0.00094537606,0.0029451593,0.0014096624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96352136,0.025414415,0.0020813607,0.0016230829,0.0063348645,0.0010248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015967047,0.0004915037,0.00058122847,0.0026729044,0.015099793,0.013974726,0.0030293756,0.0056356015,0.0059805964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04673273,0.00069899834,0.0005001513,0.0031131713,0.051044587,0.014461234,0.004111251,0.007265109,0.00060511526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038240087,0.00003480236,0.00078264927,0.00008553525,0.000008602556,0.00012090943,0.08475107,0.000140796,0.00005825192,0.8580938,0.041562375,0.014323106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056098037,0.000020266447,0.004496945,0.0012850997,0.00006594663,0.00019987833,0.1710609,0.00056567823,0.00083867257,0.46469587,0.3565857,0.00012902051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43251577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.583964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56748426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034253154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031486493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8599965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293056389","doi":"10.3138/ctr.191.011","title":"Staging Grenfell: The Ethics of Representing Housing Crises in London","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy (event); Injustice; Politics; Criticism; Sociology; Tribunal; Conversation; Law; Political science; Public administration; Social science","score_opus":0.06787248429104216,"score_gpt":0.3502969171161748,"score_spread":0.28242443282513263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293056389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051033594,0.12532748,0.0051184604,0.26043755,0.005126924,0.00019623085,0.00014296199,0.00014407077,0.55247283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8195791,0.035253428,0.0022784295,0.01791242,0.0007792284,0.00019595536,0.000079497404,0.00028364992,0.123638235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789807,0.016154744,0.00048613237,0.00057012367,0.0020649347,0.0017432694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890497,0.0073972326,0.00075233664,0.000799329,0.0010475231,0.0009538143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014168495,0.0006658134,0.0004738602,0.0017842284,0.01621662,0.01730277,0.0029335094,0.0070364466,0.0100222435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018618673,0.00040167262,0.0002947907,0.0021734177,0.051245466,0.006745648,0.008090377,0.0056340545,0.0014151953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044738477,0.000008793053,0.0003617134,0.00041740498,0.0000063749862,0.00064115995,0.3845792,0.00023384795,0.00030513635,0.49870613,0.08673263,0.027962886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009255465,0.000012134099,0.00042251332,0.0007363561,0.000003440595,0.00019042296,0.19884025,0.000056365956,0.00019465559,0.014967785,0.78453815,0.000028709674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37430355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4810859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37430355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04773739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029456193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7442497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295046659","doi":"10.1590/2179-8966/2020/53808","title":"Em busca de um paradigma: o debate escandinavo sobre a identidade da sociologia do direito","year":2022,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Direito e Práxis","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.02862562587534646,"score_gpt":0.30763375179014063,"score_spread":0.2790081259147942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295046659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050338686,0.038673695,0.023190087,0.34500298,0.0022419104,0.00007233184,0.000101344114,0.000057359935,0.54032165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91139907,0.019856134,0.009024877,0.017708426,0.0009153549,0.00014159599,0.00006732371,0.00013101858,0.040756173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787515,0.013246111,0.00058350543,0.0021038863,0.004023662,0.00129131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838626,0.010519853,0.0009800042,0.0016407593,0.0020648146,0.0009319309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019651433,0.0005839279,0.0008075344,0.0034563509,0.017015623,0.024455154,0.0026662748,0.008822256,0.0067680804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018318418,0.0006274033,0.00062657986,0.004438569,0.07506359,0.020404244,0.0087681655,0.009185622,0.001012904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007732947,0.000009327252,0.00020561309,0.0000721999,0.000002950689,0.000099865705,0.031748246,0.000056112134,0.000071856586,0.9561899,0.004397015,0.0071390886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015551072,0.000023872337,0.0011630099,0.0014731088,0.0000141353285,0.00028576396,0.108555816,0.00038880794,0.000299542,0.5237283,0.36401665,0.00003546995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040879514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05670341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040879514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017895633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022950571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12984252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297221443","doi":"10.1017/cls.2022.17","title":"Places of Justice? Representations of Law in Canadian Court Museums","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Law; Mythology; Colonialism; Indigenous; Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Political science; Economic Justice; Power (physics); Sociology; State (computer science); History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.018965910776441396,"score_gpt":0.2866417382961083,"score_spread":0.2676758275196669,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297221443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86459005,0.0017060867,0.0012743681,0.009640287,0.00014786405,0.000054833436,0.0004165275,0.000076369455,0.12209354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99592006,0.00031748912,0.00024109917,0.00016612418,0.000008377345,0.000008658641,0.00003983708,0.000011052012,0.0032873382],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968929,0.0011863547,0.000076611024,0.00025066853,0.0007379645,0.000855392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953453,0.0015318382,0.00071358634,0.00044180156,0.0008341095,0.0011333798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028042838,0.000367785,0.00034194984,0.005128831,0.025723984,0.011438871,0.001999202,0.0012715141,0.009893971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074598137,0.00034740672,0.00029736364,0.005591256,0.021368988,0.0036627688,0.0073672617,0.0017035056,0.0001794383],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041097595,0.000022513485,0.014435862,0.0000947113,0.000016443892,0.0008412426,0.90590763,0.00026495196,0.0006708608,0.049062375,0.0074131787,0.021229075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047822455,0.00001259202,0.018901758,0.00024287858,0.0000129275395,0.00019555508,0.8673006,0.00022280928,0.00015035569,0.002042701,0.11086774,0.000045181958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9047035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96536916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0952965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043947984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034014706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31886643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297684470","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190212926.013.25_update_001","title":"Language and Sexual Violence in the Legal System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Human sexuality; Ideology; Sexual violence; Meaning (existential); Heterosexuality; Gender studies; Order (exchange); Psychology; Sociology; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Psychotherapist; Politics","score_opus":0.014881885755304684,"score_gpt":0.22032887387897343,"score_spread":0.20544698812366874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297684470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02052522,0.031787902,0.0010768486,0.013129729,0.00034579923,0.000012788795,0.000036839687,0.000020057758,0.9330648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8853915,0.023294205,0.00075391476,0.0026054808,0.00060417695,0.000054114626,0.00006157799,0.000057088775,0.08717806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807227,0.0012119714,0.000042724623,0.00010667876,0.0004287845,0.00013756158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988109,0.00085618324,0.000100577316,0.00004909358,0.00012569875,0.00005756225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010367265,0.00028197034,0.00026257982,0.0018580623,0.004468817,0.0083444,0.000539475,0.0013573471,0.00958467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017852852,0.00014621697,0.00013819041,0.0018995933,0.016323596,0.0032614106,0.002675421,0.0019471082,0.00072140846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003878522,0.000011994156,0.0002391385,0.000076220414,0.000002099037,0.00014121286,0.035380006,0.00009150785,0.00015427858,0.9438834,0.0058918907,0.0141243385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071382356,0.00002510987,0.0015824155,0.0014565542,0.000006921453,0.00038080683,0.04802169,0.00034745084,0.000472361,0.22625189,0.7214233,0.000024398252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009512898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008129198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00958467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005758903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002902883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04178393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4298151153","doi":"10.1515/9780748697755-012","title":"8 Translating Part of France’s Legal Heritage: Aubry and Rau on the Patrimoine","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"History; Political science","score_opus":0.03772188292783358,"score_gpt":0.23775497162237244,"score_spread":0.20003308869453887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4298151153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012766881,0.042146888,0.0027221146,0.068086855,0.004496055,0.000034595443,0.00013992994,0.00014673527,0.86946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33226952,0.009066105,0.002448406,0.014304784,0.001883893,0.000046919933,0.00011398721,0.0003625938,0.6395038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978624,0.0010695799,0.000044929115,0.00021644456,0.00042942635,0.00037724164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990984,0.0005086819,0.000047157348,0.00007560038,0.00018321283,0.00008700057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024724503,0.0008796775,0.00046942756,0.0023210517,0.010001109,0.010428947,0.00083393167,0.0056217583,0.018650616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003956585,0.00032876068,0.00056338287,0.0013950818,0.010039929,0.00451166,0.0028970246,0.00540549,0.0024897854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016598011,0.000017178409,0.000252347,0.000055376793,0.000007270647,0.00034267484,0.023138937,0.00011537488,0.00013474957,0.8388989,0.111216515,0.025804058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005755198,0.000014593884,0.00082600256,0.00025380254,0.000004988952,0.00018804465,0.00531854,0.00008582571,0.0001657636,0.028649176,0.96447235,0.000015149109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12767276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1953181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12767276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013055613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00880909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25385922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299581660","doi":"10.25071/1913-5874/37393","title":"Personal stories, public voices: Performance for public-making","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"InTensions","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Storytelling; Vignette; Drama; Empathy; Power (physics); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Social psychology; Public relations; Face (sociological concept); The arts; Transformative learning; Media studies; Aesthetics; Pedagogy; Social science; Visual arts; Political science; Narrative; History","score_opus":0.08374588055729178,"score_gpt":0.3235044357298841,"score_spread":0.2397585551725923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299581660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11462199,0.0036738105,0.026912304,0.072787285,0.0022893741,0.0003168003,0.0000987957,0.00061125855,0.7786884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9493356,0.0010849141,0.0034634278,0.0014809613,0.0005880425,0.00018018726,0.00007629004,0.00023685122,0.043553744],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9748769,0.019841421,0.00034092346,0.0008173117,0.0018815233,0.0022418443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.982071,0.00853925,0.0015268519,0.0029219287,0.0010032868,0.003937692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018779421,0.0013798566,0.0005788195,0.0018613385,0.028417094,0.028346969,0.0034028532,0.0046766126,0.019907616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023322094,0.00048513434,0.00058010966,0.0017216901,0.04322985,0.020895768,0.02956803,0.0066694906,0.0028511784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007505443,0.0002300203,0.0012221532,0.00030709954,0.000017728416,0.0010326231,0.5488786,0.00043561315,0.0007231656,0.34871772,0.031906977,0.066453315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017376236,0.00008530311,0.0006291564,0.00034248424,0.000013586564,0.0005162052,0.5280251,0.00024554916,0.0009890989,0.06456282,0.40454403,0.000029380664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017756822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025368507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028417094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005058923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006910429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300853666","doi":"","title":"Signs of Crime. Introducing Forensic Semiotics de Marcel Danesi","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Criminology; Sociology; Art; Psychoanalysis; Art history; Philosophy; Psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.19105078521094385,"score_gpt":0.5272348065387582,"score_spread":0.33618402132781433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300853666","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01806163,0.42548144,0.032337043,0.15854686,0.006273059,0.00015559298,0.0003632698,0.000101325924,0.35867974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7025065,0.1552908,0.03785805,0.014200299,0.0057744123,0.00059312285,0.00019542186,0.00017550477,0.083406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761045,0.0016410772,0.00011141358,0.00020692623,0.0003379075,0.00009229722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998092,0.0012363914,0.00024039393,0.00008696384,0.00019888952,0.00014532208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031502065,0.00091014325,0.000636891,0.0035666653,0.0036436387,0.0064544627,0.00081722654,0.0026339067,0.0028680011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044169105,0.0005656123,0.00026625668,0.0021359937,0.027634462,0.007192784,0.0033726112,0.003783746,0.00074698473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012958309,0.0000066472758,0.00024935135,0.00014498322,0.0000025721556,0.00025146597,0.028898338,0.00009467712,0.00020176763,0.93807507,0.013869218,0.018192992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065957324,0.000020796564,0.0010094044,0.0010753261,0.0000039802267,0.0011818467,0.01331281,0.00022926489,0.0002450022,0.20989071,0.77299803,0.000026227994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011640923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015019312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011640923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002587194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042390525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300960989","doi":"10.1017/s1744552322000489","title":"Communal Justice in Shakespeare's England: Drama, Law, and Emotion By Penelope Geng, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2021. 257 pp. ISBN: 9781487508043 $75.00 (hardback)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law in Context","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Drama; Economic Justice; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Political science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.015365663588426523,"score_gpt":0.2788610716912361,"score_spread":0.2634954081028096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300960989","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017433412,0.6463223,0.00055495667,0.15796307,0.0055806353,0.000020744998,0.00019354554,0.00008460412,0.17184673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49840027,0.13852873,0.00043583894,0.014216398,0.0021959955,0.000068178735,0.00010657642,0.00012358696,0.34592435],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992725,0.00037961517,0.00002057016,0.00006395293,0.00014495161,0.00011829636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992499,0.00036198916,0.00008005235,0.000035069603,0.00009087424,0.0001821334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009787625,0.0005817486,0.00044848828,0.0007094507,0.007201741,0.0061448854,0.00055772456,0.0022689558,0.011211189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001989706,0.00035407094,0.00016751324,0.0014771242,0.012657391,0.0043693692,0.002167463,0.002687478,0.0019104097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033457312,0.000021605085,0.0007316979,0.00031631286,0.000012387521,0.00048894476,0.2278741,0.000062448395,0.00013861469,0.060591333,0.67262983,0.037099306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059235977,0.000011152705,0.0048274756,0.0007484635,0.0000035723983,0.00027036513,0.11118994,0.0000305586,0.000043991,0.006596241,0.87625515,0.000017114462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17656338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32776183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17656338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060642064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043715253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35107136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300969968","doi":"10.1017/9781009063760.015","title":"Sexuality and the Court","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024291708483446618,"score_gpt":0.23001929227604026,"score_spread":0.20572758379259365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300969968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022742596,0.010012414,0.0003725516,0.006039272,0.00016157421,0.000008080344,0.000016095833,0.000008060264,0.9606393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79599845,0.0058245393,0.00028427108,0.0022135677,0.00023828707,0.000020472426,0.000019617331,0.000023367405,0.19537741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852943,0.00072173355,0.000030453015,0.00015163327,0.00035201834,0.00021470893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995384,0.00021440588,0.000048367892,0.000048697624,0.00005855938,0.000091563634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007994499,0.00019791305,0.00020442677,0.0007705685,0.0063350364,0.008587649,0.0004540767,0.0019790046,0.009121619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015113486,0.00018270515,0.00010840944,0.00097175007,0.02487394,0.002777543,0.0030756535,0.0027345223,0.00080111006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000418675,0.000007228538,0.00022668729,0.000013366906,0.0000012166952,0.000128224,0.016646327,0.000031679185,0.00008592722,0.97095144,0.004553714,0.007350001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009772949,0.000028768485,0.0017496509,0.000267957,0.000004126568,0.00054771604,0.026497113,0.000119767115,0.00029796772,0.25253564,0.7179271,0.000014329428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010052487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018695561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010052487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042805616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027729217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031057835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300992885","doi":"","title":"Peter Fitzpatrick, Law as Resistance: Modernism, Imperialism, Legalism","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Legalism (Western philosophy); Resistance (ecology); Modernism (music); Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Aesthetics; Politics","score_opus":0.18857339633490544,"score_gpt":0.5555175549019938,"score_spread":0.3669441585670884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300992885","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033629194,0.46267062,0.0020387843,0.38700062,0.0030270475,0.000034648816,0.00011701273,0.000048889193,0.14169942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2271184,0.5081378,0.0038492419,0.081232205,0.012669966,0.00021746362,0.00015894903,0.00013746305,0.16647851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921167,0.00032998095,0.00003907155,0.000097560966,0.00024805884,0.000073586154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983747,0.0011494108,0.00015939743,0.00005758927,0.00014988406,0.00010911048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010927806,0.0005170696,0.0003284646,0.0014429223,0.0033295094,0.004849925,0.000965679,0.0040966715,0.005580349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034600794,0.000432388,0.00024275953,0.0022120704,0.00954266,0.011213705,0.0015589383,0.0046767415,0.0013922057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003237523,0.000038677234,0.00045404118,0.00026888956,0.000015641432,0.00020670776,0.005555236,0.00014024666,0.00016525458,0.51330817,0.45222905,0.027585806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025203299,0.00001719283,0.0029879266,0.00062940567,0.00001160713,0.00029521488,0.00598963,0.00018258185,0.00029506796,0.3565097,0.63302696,0.000029497609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009941397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02028007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009941397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025297322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020328553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019767046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301400346","doi":"10.3366/elr.2022.0783","title":"How Should Complainer Anonymity for Sexual Offences be Introduced in Scotland? Learning the International Lessons of #Letherspeak","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Edinburgh Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anonymity; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Common law; Scots; Norwegian; Sociology","score_opus":0.10001269728111611,"score_gpt":0.36763392625535485,"score_spread":0.26762122897423873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301400346","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06300813,0.15792814,0.001249693,0.653473,0.00636663,0.000104348605,0.000097961965,0.000065396474,0.11770669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70587164,0.12509136,0.0009640256,0.13603,0.004389235,0.000095307696,0.00008657596,0.0000640321,0.027407903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832772,0.00714261,0.0011278245,0.00081042066,0.0043790545,0.003262893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97233206,0.01638824,0.0023077086,0.0010342299,0.0057711033,0.0021666752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026372911,0.00026402329,0.0006477235,0.002169699,0.0042538154,0.008741244,0.0016192317,0.005622022,0.002700733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04727563,0.00042189733,0.00063195615,0.0015626842,0.011838062,0.006557906,0.004481421,0.0064056665,0.00044383615],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001246361,0.00015548951,0.006032374,0.002192871,0.000068470516,0.0022424383,0.03435919,0.00043067013,0.0006271364,0.5747844,0.13328673,0.24569556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008066299,0.00035317862,0.013960741,0.0033752646,0.000100704674,0.0006619012,0.021825979,0.00014590213,0.0006812769,0.022843972,0.9358518,0.00011867189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.117978975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15117614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117978975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012340632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03135687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23458457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301728158","doi":"10.25071/1913-5874/37390","title":"Fat Politics Photography: The Stareable Body and “Openings” for Social Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"InTensions","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Photography; Embodied cognition; Politics; Staring; Constitution; Sociology; Normalization (sociology); Aesthetics; Law; Art; Epistemology; Political science; Visual arts; Social science; Philosophy; Communication","score_opus":0.03796466352234625,"score_gpt":0.32650111560882017,"score_spread":0.28853645208647394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301728158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1938749,0.004572412,0.03140081,0.11390207,0.001383854,0.000069619295,0.000057026547,0.0001429561,0.6545963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98089474,0.00051647704,0.0018406803,0.0029297678,0.00020960401,0.000038716607,0.0000084524645,0.000046351364,0.013515106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997985,0.0013213134,0.00003500384,0.00018947817,0.000265722,0.00020349358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980539,0.0011768669,0.00015832919,0.0003101313,0.00013870883,0.00016205017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026411416,0.00033578987,0.0002166659,0.0009501301,0.0084449,0.008529119,0.00075045845,0.0028777923,0.0037002955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047323494,0.00023750933,0.00035826396,0.00036955578,0.06839161,0.008220494,0.0052834987,0.005168111,0.000343859],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014195837,0.000008900504,0.00034025655,0.000021653128,0.0000026261712,0.00017067812,0.06867738,0.000052352145,0.00032468792,0.923294,0.0027607398,0.004332499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030913372,0.00005534463,0.001827272,0.00027866237,0.000017097338,0.00045927207,0.14925563,0.00053830934,0.0017733801,0.62724763,0.21848372,0.000032762448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045207622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060135545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008529119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030606075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016390809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022206366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4301776096","doi":"10.1163/24714607-02003008","title":"Cohen, Nicole. Writers’ Rights: Freelance Journalism in a Digital Age. Montreal and Kingston: Mcgill-Queen’s University Press, 2016. 336 pp. $34.95 (hardcover).","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Labor and Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Media studies; Journalism; Art history; Art; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.010029178416470061,"score_gpt":0.24540962793834434,"score_spread":0.23538044952187429,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4301776096","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006461547,0.8161053,0.00087382336,0.10842795,0.0063546547,0.00003771284,0.0007236572,0.00021605722,0.066614635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037163652,0.7650966,0.0025424159,0.019561222,0.007584901,0.0001481178,0.0005280928,0.00053527154,0.16683967],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987129,0.00027846507,0.00011001588,0.00012246313,0.0006247648,0.00015131295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98896617,0.005466073,0.0007054383,0.00026876392,0.0034053077,0.0011882558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002718065,0.0012304767,0.0006569843,0.0054390426,0.0054426505,0.005686589,0.002069173,0.0060133385,0.04369921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009741489,0.0013079622,0.00038133463,0.0055967304,0.0038806093,0.012700614,0.0021497018,0.003629637,0.020855421],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020247044,0.000008881177,0.00015563697,0.00022784703,0.000003348141,0.00004717214,0.0007570752,0.000024141678,0.000070682,0.0061119823,0.9417139,0.050859008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018299332,0.000005823382,0.0018232838,0.0009252779,0.000010117036,0.00011167678,0.001550092,0.000031487303,0.00016326887,0.007824527,0.9875145,0.000021606282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.109613754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25728428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109613754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051927245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007887934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21795148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4302790516","doi":"","title":"The Adjustment of Legal Instruments to the New European Architecture","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Architecture; Political science; Computer science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.12537287379335146,"score_gpt":0.5130026471665312,"score_spread":0.3876297733731797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4302790516","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080998905,0.0036294402,0.04359713,0.083045945,0.004703972,0.00023556607,0.000121360245,0.00040268718,0.783265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77486753,0.0015574928,0.031417802,0.022323668,0.0012992963,0.00036047553,0.0001919039,0.00022699268,0.16775486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98634017,0.004926854,0.00097202335,0.002065071,0.0042588944,0.0014369286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911457,0.0019188047,0.0005552772,0.0022023756,0.0031990923,0.0009787048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015611555,0.00040300027,0.0003532358,0.0025078538,0.0047826953,0.0124481935,0.0019904436,0.0055465414,0.0048022517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029348122,0.0004222512,0.0009236675,0.0018104782,0.019357618,0.007853277,0.007100579,0.008233906,0.0008439726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004389339,0.000011018235,0.00010878841,0.000006049962,0.0000023008179,0.000037550115,0.00087477284,0.00022142181,0.00007023726,0.9914826,0.0022513554,0.0049296203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003160808,0.00005407188,0.0018787945,0.00014639157,0.000008842267,0.0001740387,0.00178535,0.0013030889,0.00023033547,0.3878721,0.6064694,0.000046101504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017983979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016562743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017983979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015260712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014337179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11072475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303431533","doi":"10.7202/1092329ar","title":"Harris, V. (2021). Ghosts of Archive. Deconstructive Intersectionality and Praxis. Londres, Royaume-Uni : Routledge, 166 pages","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Archives","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Intersectionality; Art history; Sociology; Humanities; Art; Political science; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.011391664392175312,"score_gpt":0.25661690685317073,"score_spread":0.24522524246099542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303431533","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016990358,0.69023055,0.0024959352,0.21522929,0.0064685475,0.00005477007,0.00054986135,0.00011299161,0.08315901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13419856,0.5558439,0.008849131,0.052278366,0.0040583704,0.0002976184,0.00064207264,0.00038304678,0.24344885],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982338,0.0006263322,0.00013744274,0.00017563123,0.00063809403,0.00018864758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964103,0.0014114389,0.00025525643,0.00013928225,0.0014835307,0.00030007277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028597643,0.0007972008,0.0005709289,0.002593957,0.0070297467,0.007030043,0.0015563456,0.0058720787,0.01184762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005751558,0.00083684677,0.00045098335,0.004190392,0.011514959,0.013307154,0.002655185,0.0056061144,0.0046388926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031508567,0.000012237284,0.0007499774,0.00035857662,0.00000792196,0.00016440931,0.012937069,0.000071676965,0.00015871716,0.110783845,0.78669304,0.088031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011313664,0.000008842059,0.0017255152,0.0016038761,0.000008870953,0.00016828116,0.008636324,0.000041298466,0.00016349103,0.031825144,0.95578265,0.000024506153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34761652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43839702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34761652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011546465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01975814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6911863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304191779","doi":"10.32873/uno.dc.jrf.26.02.23","title":"Godland","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Religion & Film","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.011871261419803724,"score_gpt":0.2798076393045567,"score_spread":0.267936377884753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304191779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037327672,0.043095976,0.0005828404,0.06983081,0.05864033,0.0000663534,0.0006951652,0.00020016117,0.82315546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024177305,0.0088639725,0.0004401503,0.012086001,0.0034356685,0.00002627919,0.00029972664,0.00018711499,0.9504837],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996412,0.00006412294,0.0000108729755,0.000060293856,0.00016823676,0.000055326534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995809,0.00007809623,0.000025513566,0.000035129735,0.00017561282,0.000104766346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040317932,0.00037316047,0.00017637375,0.0006727102,0.002686467,0.0021800355,0.000417234,0.0011133124,0.073961295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019454613,0.00017038519,0.00016661195,0.00039155435,0.0006358781,0.001706048,0.0015191929,0.0020474633,0.013898202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002154297,0.0000051516095,0.00010250286,0.0000918934,0.0000017688438,0.00009356609,0.0005961519,0.000012367219,0.00026365626,0.015529917,0.960583,0.022698566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.7111466e-7,0.000002400894,0.000151349,0.000037425292,5.2427464e-7,0.000034267643,0.000183438,0.0000053275758,0.00006968653,0.00015528056,0.9993586,0.0000010373146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009708669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033503115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073961295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011646776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010423447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304693891","doi":"10.22329/il.v42i3.7496","title":"From the Editors","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Field (mathematics); Modal; Set (abstract data type); Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019395303028040413,"score_gpt":0.2706361895161204,"score_spread":0.25124088648807996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304693891","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011110485,0.0108273495,0.0003263156,0.088225335,0.8751014,0.000025851863,0.00018907577,0.00014265819,0.025051061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022156478,0.016490892,0.00048487744,0.09470619,0.6036445,0.0000612226,0.00043359393,0.0002994483,0.28166363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736124,0.0003905806,0.0002480826,0.0004777224,0.0012748567,0.0002473724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98894554,0.0024921868,0.000603115,0.0007477467,0.00505473,0.0021566518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002825254,0.0014669605,0.001138039,0.0017761481,0.0024341862,0.008389861,0.0028023818,0.0056008375,0.16545853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018931689,0.00055033935,0.0008529124,0.0015078735,0.0012378831,0.0061791297,0.0032391408,0.007966911,0.12039805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009673193,0.0000059114523,0.000025116567,0.00006835639,0.0000016493863,0.000021101778,0.000016485159,0.000009713266,0.00004215667,0.0008231173,0.9872457,0.011731106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002660618,0.000005160827,0.000059109032,0.00008195128,0.0000015696762,0.000039302024,0.00002679779,0.000012158965,0.000031730367,0.0004281609,0.999308,0.0000034203106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008923405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023147133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16545853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017698818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002561262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5535139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308460204","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v16i3.2523","title":"Critical Legal Practices: Approaches to Law in Contemporary Anti-racist Social Justice Struggles in Sweden","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Sociology; Law; Economic Justice; Legal profession; Ideology; Legal realism; Redistribution (election); Social movement; Political science; Social psychology; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.3458234471174489,"score_gpt":0.4500881839645981,"score_spread":0.10426473684714921,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308460204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87447554,0.0053834547,0.0050699594,0.033467304,0.00040839365,0.00012917673,0.000033647284,0.00005051431,0.08098188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99398464,0.0008751807,0.000663961,0.00086921715,0.00005346325,0.00006346787,0.0000130201715,0.000028559507,0.0034486207],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9556428,0.03470997,0.0009936698,0.001883502,0.00287577,0.0038943505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94627845,0.043942023,0.0041159587,0.0009434619,0.0020081534,0.0027120016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024384517,0.00096511334,0.001051681,0.008960183,0.040218044,0.029613236,0.0037956703,0.009148419,0.002808669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032096345,0.00090660155,0.0006094458,0.0059577273,0.12903164,0.0139413085,0.017712789,0.008520463,0.00040944916],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049714995,0.00000990303,0.00033058034,0.000034007287,0.0000016018158,0.00042457457,0.9700869,0.00002970236,0.000052182393,0.027977146,0.00023162832,0.00081675587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021372975,0.0000053234407,0.00018958609,0.00014244331,0.0000017360984,0.0001745192,0.98303103,0.00004277348,0.000051687697,0.0049732756,0.011379707,0.0000057649113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018443994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02193461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040218044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030897351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016608965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.224177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308587008","doi":"10.4324/9781003164227-6","title":"Introduction","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.017259192531955042,"score_gpt":0.25746628946456784,"score_spread":0.2402070969326128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308587008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000828568,0.0072391634,0.0038326248,0.005302471,0.0046679857,0.00017296067,0.0024353815,0.0007362183,0.9747847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005211246,0.0070431405,0.0036325825,0.0032892362,0.0010766154,0.00017530701,0.0031845563,0.00040519497,0.97598195],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990023,0.00012340312,0.000054508666,0.00022023756,0.00046276546,0.00013673556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938333,0.00013073056,0.000034919656,0.00006643399,0.00027262938,0.00011204714],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000610801,0.0008044591,0.0005691837,0.0014565518,0.0019634932,0.005315199,0.0018230025,0.0025877676,0.43815184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025582183,0.00032332857,0.00052855874,0.001555085,0.00084518216,0.0038326348,0.0030034932,0.0021120773,0.26330265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031717624,0.000053861164,0.00035308683,0.00038700047,0.000004010395,0.0001861519,0.00092824415,0.00014521282,0.00036066392,0.08406185,0.72840047,0.1850878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.251669e-7,0.0000051706493,0.000093627605,0.00009630008,4.6287977e-7,0.00006955073,0.00011234958,0.00001350436,0.00002811634,0.002149551,0.99742824,0.00000220395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002978038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038360478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56184816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00189653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018029338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8014082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311374943","doi":"","title":"La fiction, une catégorie opératoire pour défendre l’art","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.014105060772825943,"score_gpt":0.24470015121697644,"score_spread":0.2305950904441505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311374943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016193401,0.01914995,0.02179384,0.07711204,0.0055737104,0.000049816015,0.0003325619,0.0002281482,0.8595666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6948426,0.0068055843,0.006135391,0.007490431,0.010724739,0.00015204046,0.00035790814,0.0006035405,0.27288786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722457,0.0015227849,0.0000815586,0.0003990178,0.0004844588,0.00028764864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964051,0.002343795,0.00018978557,0.00041038077,0.0004989699,0.00015194896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027804743,0.00086886476,0.0005502341,0.0035345305,0.008053645,0.013315028,0.0008051478,0.006006855,0.015434331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007144581,0.0003061523,0.00063653116,0.0020416626,0.021369059,0.007839924,0.002233099,0.007466613,0.0023712171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000784939,0.000002597319,0.000041336745,0.000022497836,0.0000026497569,0.000032492586,0.0039174487,0.00005337967,0.000100626006,0.97891176,0.014115141,0.0027923016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010873576,0.00001604805,0.00043152267,0.00017254891,0.000010299019,0.00019930728,0.0028903396,0.0004003485,0.00035475614,0.18269688,0.8127954,0.000021633248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007156406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006110224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015434331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006992993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002202673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05163294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312156100","doi":"10.1017/s1537592722003152","title":"Women, Power, and Property: The Paradox of Gender Equality Laws in India. By Rachel Brulé. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2020. 394p. $120.00 cloth, $32.99 paper.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Politics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Property (philosophy); Action (physics); Power (physics); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.027124057727788205,"score_gpt":0.2708318733335281,"score_spread":0.2437078156057399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312156100","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027707675,0.6214918,0.00031670977,0.32346815,0.004038462,0.000012370303,0.0001854508,0.000033665146,0.04768265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19249143,0.6606144,0.0008897853,0.0294422,0.0064239516,0.0000834235,0.0002824302,0.00013116088,0.109641366],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897027,0.00043972273,0.000038271635,0.00010556169,0.0002449297,0.00020123269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813473,0.0012048513,0.00018556105,0.000065867935,0.0001885037,0.00022036591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015708618,0.00095372024,0.00060588913,0.0017876516,0.0032405867,0.005070038,0.0013189763,0.0032406005,0.009228381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030250782,0.0007668615,0.00039142842,0.0038300594,0.0094479965,0.007456852,0.002645666,0.0054496317,0.0016642727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054372118,0.000035862253,0.00069506175,0.0006417465,0.000023397894,0.00020272446,0.008683724,0.00021843468,0.00015225788,0.18020977,0.7448691,0.06421345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017798642,0.000022114,0.0069628214,0.0019444461,0.000022187176,0.00037100053,0.012097441,0.00024073654,0.00023392851,0.0989775,0.8790545,0.000055495002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034432482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0654821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034432482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046225404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046845316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0684641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312336434","doi":"10.21747/21833745/lanlaw/9_1a4","title":"The importance of being heard Stories of unrepresented litigants in small claims cases and private family proceedings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language and Law=Linguagem e Direito","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Association of Canadian Universities for Northern Studies","funders":"Arts and Humanities Research Council","keywords":"Narrative; Presentation (obstetrics); Ethnography; Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Political science; Media studies; Literature; Art; Anthropology","score_opus":0.016740534940482693,"score_gpt":0.28867297479571846,"score_spread":0.27193243985523574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312336434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9651841,0.0022491484,0.001991181,0.0033962536,0.00015998282,0.00006271533,0.000085009524,0.000023713674,0.026847927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642026,0.0006655432,0.00030512182,0.00023357004,0.000058323665,0.0000316002,0.000039654205,0.000018946806,0.0022268938],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.983132,0.012325333,0.00058582466,0.0009693664,0.0017286321,0.0012587279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9530195,0.038636316,0.004445917,0.001409594,0.00093862496,0.0015500478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006627189,0.0006579609,0.00060515106,0.002495721,0.008844145,0.011329505,0.0017003502,0.0044556772,0.004949989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04434462,0.0006097119,0.00037948007,0.0019140681,0.013990057,0.010334774,0.010495195,0.0031269228,0.00053714786],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039315088,0.000021661142,0.001582758,0.00007341882,0.0000074970503,0.0015219697,0.98982656,0.000024267474,0.0005546868,0.0020926546,0.0002944195,0.0039607403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047400667,0.000055867855,0.003799773,0.00017353537,0.000008938353,0.0024674148,0.9771399,0.00009537226,0.0006370849,0.0014089182,0.014185458,0.000022925848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026144236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038493522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011329505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022548104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011930623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035048306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312610696","doi":"10.53288/0338.1.05","title":"Tales of a Modern Parrot","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Punctum Books","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Brock University","keywords":"Zoology; Art; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.03128959645810704,"score_gpt":0.2605588126438723,"score_spread":0.2292692161857653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312610696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037850777,0.0036441863,0.0011254655,0.009196954,0.0016129271,0.000021137908,0.0000669016,0.00005943456,0.98048806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03454683,0.0016191419,0.0010432338,0.0024826722,0.0004962014,0.000018120752,0.000034848643,0.000094499876,0.9596645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996811,0.00009420357,0.000008094192,0.00006439669,0.00008888896,0.000063266394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998348,0.00003692075,0.000009777093,0.000019148421,0.000045819263,0.000053544754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000435296,0.000542844,0.00028395237,0.00062395155,0.0065062693,0.0041394546,0.0005096156,0.0015152134,0.06336179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085695996,0.0002555577,0.00018952269,0.00061502267,0.0059311707,0.003561981,0.002207246,0.002522175,0.010015626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060522896,0.00003051091,0.00034519407,0.00010650298,0.000006490512,0.0004306712,0.01911619,0.00012625175,0.00061628263,0.46154937,0.4552,0.062412065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011383903,0.000010053741,0.00022604884,0.000031133764,8.165261e-7,0.00010031268,0.0016685395,0.000020376725,0.000025471685,0.0035938104,0.9943197,0.0000026569783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008260157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034296997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06336179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001980154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083141564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21196634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312790623","doi":"10.7202/1093868ar","title":"Accès à la justice dans les tribunaux criminels en temps de crise de COVID-19","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"International Centre for Comparative Criminology; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Humanities; Ethnology; Sociology; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.35223277458114716,"score_gpt":0.4330111678195599,"score_spread":0.08077839323841274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312790623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9517624,0.0010186033,0.00079576083,0.0027923326,0.000064489424,0.00010303543,0.00010961989,0.000013779547,0.04334003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98273414,0.00082490727,0.00048596968,0.00031128663,0.000009648457,0.00004220773,0.00004292166,0.00001040203,0.015538421],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978276,0.00047941456,0.00005102453,0.0002028268,0.0005320023,0.00090722175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976342,0.00047051918,0.00031551786,0.000106741216,0.00077834015,0.00069462834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015777075,0.0002829255,0.00041379037,0.0011699225,0.021930521,0.0054550357,0.0010398022,0.0010148088,0.006258282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003631134,0.0003104912,0.00016744967,0.0019141264,0.009013058,0.0014468416,0.0033893147,0.0013087454,0.00033146626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001452952,0.00009512739,0.07455416,0.00025818066,0.000021413187,0.0033022615,0.8401316,0.00019181437,0.0025348805,0.027322581,0.004853635,0.04658902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006969228,0.00007057242,0.09939671,0.00027548498,0.000019434161,0.00039132714,0.82332337,0.00012040972,0.0004470292,0.0009819043,0.07492802,0.00003870898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8854403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9713056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8854403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036210857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049248707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2627294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313057730","doi":"10.7202/1093108ar","title":"Museal Governance and Cultural Law: Presentation of the Selected Texts","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Muséologies Les cahiers d études supérieures","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Corporate governance; Political science; Law; Sociology; Management; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.022673362929768126,"score_gpt":0.2766272851931019,"score_spread":0.2539539222633338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313057730","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09532615,0.22730237,0.0046041706,0.06551645,0.016413866,0.0009474776,0.003869476,0.0001360957,0.58588386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47995573,0.19488877,0.004587865,0.010573437,0.027324695,0.0014287048,0.0032141397,0.00043643214,0.27759016],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921334,0.0003446534,0.00006353348,0.00006227594,0.0002230572,0.000093129536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770254,0.0016915507,0.00017234542,0.0000447467,0.00022159093,0.00016730245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010477324,0.0005287381,0.000600847,0.004917874,0.0029723947,0.0053402437,0.00064041314,0.0012753219,0.01618688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043172063,0.00015369731,0.00026244842,0.008592373,0.002014293,0.0017718846,0.0022433472,0.0011103479,0.0016046622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017916218,0.00014759872,0.0014941585,0.004667531,0.0000349945,0.0023556591,0.09604999,0.00048111865,0.0038330953,0.15018666,0.5834802,0.15708984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011515604,0.00001698951,0.0027469844,0.0013101081,0.000006835724,0.00039397564,0.018118862,0.00005590732,0.00037077462,0.0030870023,0.973873,0.000007984602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001863283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036866355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01618688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026625772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019416192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05415058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313296134","doi":"10.1163/27727866-bja00015","title":"Constitutional Imagination Between the Force of Images and the Power of Names","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Social Imaginaries","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Speculation; Imagination; Power (physics); Action (physics); Aesthetics; Psychology; Epistemology; Content (measure theory); Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009554014473622589,"score_gpt":0.3079134634937593,"score_spread":0.2983594490201367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313296134","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123197146,0.0036907452,0.030858345,0.10094861,0.0010669971,0.000037094982,0.00007194246,0.00011848848,0.7400106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930737,0.00030264756,0.0008917152,0.00077024725,0.00014280347,0.000009869634,0.0000065271824,0.000028602124,0.004773859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904421,0.0076704505,0.00016697226,0.00047199547,0.00086678076,0.00038175908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98123497,0.014351725,0.00116416,0.001277978,0.0012931675,0.0006781641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008244617,0.0003961535,0.0003446052,0.0014776419,0.0062091905,0.013153809,0.0010205441,0.003705684,0.0052164546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023529941,0.0003338041,0.00027098844,0.0009040397,0.077809766,0.01889511,0.0060218484,0.0063815806,0.00047224114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000123286445,0.0000038121946,0.00007754544,0.000014937962,0.0000014877546,0.000059614504,0.03474098,0.000035359255,0.000120195815,0.9625393,0.0011854002,0.001209017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028395165,0.000037008183,0.00047884273,0.00024303023,0.0000088390125,0.0003476682,0.075205564,0.0007776707,0.0007150764,0.80542225,0.11669955,0.000036205267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027440994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002069043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013153809,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036934288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016180545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04360223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313419803","doi":"10.14430/arctic76639","title":"I Spy Through a Camera’s Eye: Divii in the Gwich’in Settlement Area","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ARCTIC","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Gwich'in Renewable Resources Board","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Geography; Geology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.029848873839462074,"score_gpt":0.3139585888071921,"score_spread":0.28410971496773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313419803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7406175,0.001719495,0.0010576211,0.05877476,0.0022479077,0.00006009548,0.00015617878,0.000082433966,0.19528396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88251895,0.00091297063,0.0006254463,0.009302727,0.00029171558,0.000045297995,0.000095039046,0.00015167613,0.10605619],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883074,0.00046478427,0.000018099556,0.000118946875,0.00008503312,0.0004824454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987668,0.00022413881,0.00008397426,0.000038808255,0.000114870316,0.00077143195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011672549,0.000377447,0.0003135447,0.00059059955,0.03731026,0.0060979207,0.0012798833,0.004530612,0.011739139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028478196,0.0003308289,0.00021241067,0.000734555,0.008410611,0.0032805717,0.0056555704,0.008333008,0.0018213737],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068408124,0.000061973216,0.008526818,0.000063512125,0.000007505159,0.005512974,0.8917458,0.00004902532,0.0006326587,0.019931432,0.057486612,0.015913285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021159758,0.000020016061,0.0039373334,0.00008702429,0.0000026744235,0.0006392669,0.86352175,0.000033122484,0.00008251867,0.00080305355,0.13086107,0.000010076492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1868598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4720038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8131402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004650844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046418966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3715443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313787453","doi":"10.1353/ths.2022.0017","title":"Law and Performance ed. by Austin Sarat, Lawrence Douglas, and Martha Merrill Umphrey","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theatre history studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Principle of legality; Sociology; Performative utterance; Political science; Art; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.025192828069343025,"score_gpt":0.2600031828697813,"score_spread":0.23481035480043827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313787453","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00070081785,0.4208631,0.00077402685,0.17295656,0.04855204,0.00006308004,0.00043360874,0.00026381452,0.35539296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010892641,0.16181025,0.00047467242,0.01419643,0.016782854,0.00010065864,0.0003570463,0.00027779452,0.7951077],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980568,0.0004340904,0.00008340451,0.0002932302,0.0008803221,0.00025206959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979037,0.0005671577,0.00022183206,0.000100558245,0.0007120172,0.0004947583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015977079,0.0018539054,0.0009742402,0.0018883691,0.003331624,0.009659969,0.0013560123,0.0037708287,0.12805094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063952953,0.00062511006,0.00045547128,0.0024568758,0.003267631,0.0076928036,0.003624622,0.0051390063,0.07455322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004109098,0.00000661406,0.000036966932,0.000083507985,7.8840526e-7,0.000018185048,0.0003338786,0.000028083776,0.000019481504,0.005067548,0.9700309,0.024369895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.587345e-7,0.0000030313663,0.00016676533,0.00045294716,6.333284e-7,0.000033026696,0.00040466394,0.000013022852,0.000011285892,0.0011737256,0.99773586,0.000004143137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015839139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022493348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12805094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00535925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007427634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42837304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315642800","doi":"10.7202/1095234ar","title":"Reading Poetry and Its Paratexts for Evidence of Fair Dealing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Canadian Literature","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poetry; Reading (process); Literature; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics","score_opus":0.054371163732776465,"score_gpt":0.37734019220440224,"score_spread":0.3229690284716258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315642800","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054112945,0.01907117,0.007453139,0.0847862,0.0018191134,0.00012716535,0.00061101856,0.000093841074,0.8319254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693535,0.0051279007,0.0028395804,0.0020348534,0.0003252386,0.00007223035,0.00024020295,0.00008627233,0.019920163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869163,0.0065358263,0.00060806284,0.0006877748,0.0044914233,0.00076068117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94370025,0.03270706,0.0033603928,0.004970845,0.013758563,0.0015028247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008730132,0.00041137272,0.00043605684,0.0051259,0.007548923,0.011643025,0.0016122138,0.0024234646,0.013019798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10088447,0.00034711906,0.00024727412,0.0064757895,0.049881164,0.015016835,0.0062259785,0.005484934,0.0009971766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049433806,0.000022092063,0.0013409012,0.00028137874,0.000009804846,0.00026394395,0.086889125,0.00006387237,0.00029247347,0.8641949,0.015125621,0.031466566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025639958,0.00003756235,0.014331783,0.0021633727,0.000041004743,0.00050755043,0.14221968,0.00022607739,0.0013303536,0.47134605,0.36769184,0.00007903563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15028313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1750612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8497169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012657963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024288835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29881674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315700262","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12790","title":"K.Bowrey, Copyright, Creativity, Big Media and Cultural Value: Incorporating the Author, Routledge, 2020, 228 pp, hb, £36.99.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Creativity; Section (typography); Sociology; Library science; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.06395492923406,"score_gpt":0.3489646009622671,"score_spread":0.2850096717282071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315700262","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010667902,0.79288507,0.001977113,0.058566406,0.0042258007,0.00004173781,0.0003097542,0.0001786361,0.14074865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017905992,0.6583532,0.0031396367,0.014378901,0.002502369,0.00017709898,0.00027211002,0.00032771003,0.3029429],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985631,0.00042787788,0.000087277964,0.00014433521,0.0006565547,0.000120786484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964469,0.0026077726,0.00021774259,0.00011660401,0.00033022542,0.0002807897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017283075,0.000988247,0.0007292645,0.002023764,0.0025355308,0.011146337,0.0014840701,0.004699418,0.028182726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068524075,0.0010234138,0.00037687132,0.0048961923,0.0038155068,0.018241625,0.0032670798,0.00428404,0.014309812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002014515,0.000017848142,0.00016064952,0.0009698561,0.0000058706014,0.0001791102,0.006634407,0.00008773132,0.00016927984,0.053006954,0.82776576,0.11098246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002716341,0.0000052182577,0.0003681794,0.0009760879,0.000003402866,0.00014989605,0.0024807688,0.00004170016,0.000046807865,0.011990908,0.98392606,0.000008331884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0141805895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03504436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028182726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035450158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006480611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0942806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315747762","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-16590-0","title":"Restorative Justice in the Classroom","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Mathematics education; Criminology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03814962620000264,"score_gpt":0.32215202194765613,"score_spread":0.2840023957476535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315747762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029015192,0.0154176215,0.0031877046,0.009725354,0.0017176487,0.00003224487,0.00002853641,0.000134223,0.9668551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05026727,0.01124213,0.0030074685,0.0031593803,0.00047250267,0.000060030936,0.000048690534,0.00015603246,0.93158644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961,0.00010234379,0.000007191653,0.000036265945,0.00017429232,0.000069874375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975544,0.00009714647,0.00001561232,0.00002348681,0.00005221975,0.00005614942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036689217,0.00035729323,0.00028693065,0.0004997558,0.0034097815,0.0046621035,0.0005313349,0.001367878,0.020689227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009075337,0.00016621746,0.00023051177,0.0004387744,0.0032033233,0.0034827292,0.0022225163,0.0030836673,0.0049343924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009330957,0.00007337434,0.00020272419,0.00013376086,0.000002348774,0.00015452012,0.010691249,0.00021059797,0.00063202804,0.5515416,0.31371722,0.12263123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015909931,0.000008771726,0.00018236165,0.00019598386,0.0000012430517,0.000120652374,0.002799666,0.00007338106,0.000147338,0.039632417,0.9568323,0.0000041929834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034320706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012997519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020689227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016866754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030989486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06921232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318018851","doi":"10.3167/hrrh.2023.490101","title":"The Queer Death of the Hanged Dog","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Queer; Human sexuality; Punishment (psychology); Identity (music); Meaning (existential); Power (physics); State (computer science); History; Literature; Sociology; Aesthetics; Art; Law; Gender studies; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06576790453986552,"score_gpt":0.36039517076796435,"score_spread":0.2946272662280988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318018851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37928683,0.012447305,0.0037459137,0.15764485,0.0037496865,0.000030959334,0.00014832687,0.00013075987,0.44281533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9550216,0.0011878492,0.00015414374,0.0047307457,0.00042061118,0.000006714569,0.00001432082,0.000030235122,0.038433623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988055,0.0006817353,0.000030358711,0.00013621386,0.00013006009,0.0002161695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882895,0.0005647229,0.00017134396,0.000113142414,0.00020927495,0.000112483125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017019802,0.00020410854,0.00023637031,0.00040901618,0.008220109,0.0037800616,0.00047217723,0.0028192177,0.0057211122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038283586,0.0001655634,0.00013554897,0.00027929028,0.024730008,0.0030906484,0.0023418975,0.0059977192,0.0008591061],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008109652,0.000039337003,0.0018480453,0.00008807748,0.00001241088,0.0025553224,0.30798122,0.00015108952,0.00070256024,0.6174674,0.05556995,0.013503662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014043474,0.0000942592,0.0024701164,0.00034425454,0.000013162864,0.0017415078,0.17425138,0.0001971783,0.0011665133,0.04334342,0.77632594,0.000038189377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011744058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017209357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011744058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00387957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012740527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028148413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318212249","doi":"10.7202/1095741ar","title":"L’espace du droit et ses limites : la sculpture Spirit of Haida Gwaii et le wampum à deux rangs (two row wampum) comme images du pluralisme juridique au Canada","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; ESPACE; Art; Sculpture; Ethnology; Art history; Sociology","score_opus":0.009312240425361294,"score_gpt":0.21938112242759195,"score_spread":0.21006888200223064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318212249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20963012,0.006268231,0.004509117,0.044883892,0.0003269862,0.000042730233,0.00016307132,0.00005647915,0.73411936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91374445,0.0017091589,0.0008295089,0.0027322469,0.000057573154,0.000025200996,0.000031768755,0.00003968191,0.08083039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875355,0.00021663641,0.00001730169,0.00014759914,0.00046403287,0.00040094752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992539,0.00021582008,0.00006713479,0.000054394117,0.00024316384,0.00016554333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010911422,0.00031202417,0.00024832337,0.0009332529,0.015704049,0.009241562,0.0009480001,0.0019681484,0.0045807427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018224735,0.00023041003,0.00020347392,0.0015238798,0.026449544,0.0032198003,0.0036289215,0.004736762,0.00032178365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020035966,0.000004936524,0.0010906844,0.0000368695,0.0000040461778,0.0002525963,0.15069793,0.00011210741,0.00036391494,0.829863,0.008433462,0.009120381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022175145,0.000021101192,0.009934264,0.00043192616,0.000033105975,0.00030974872,0.24631923,0.00060647185,0.00076839834,0.086623766,0.65483797,0.00009174388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86868936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93522006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13131064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03476564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031274002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26416785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318213977","doi":"10.7202/1095742ar","title":"Les lieux du droit et les objets culturels","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017064894764947096,"score_gpt":0.24309051906885373,"score_spread":0.22602562430390663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318213977","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07497245,0.01678057,0.014728041,0.055059552,0.002018702,0.00010552778,0.0005375923,0.00009662482,0.8357009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72189975,0.005774244,0.0045802398,0.006568209,0.0005368569,0.00015194417,0.0002152374,0.00015527161,0.26011825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975212,0.00097167457,0.00007184442,0.0003491974,0.00059885916,0.00048719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985037,0.00057627395,0.00015377413,0.00012750595,0.00043078474,0.00020798971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018977626,0.00065500895,0.0003754796,0.001339746,0.009829717,0.008430829,0.0012603218,0.0027943342,0.011096413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032895273,0.00021702111,0.00038993845,0.0012159344,0.020021893,0.0039696614,0.0031424682,0.0051791724,0.0014918069],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002313113,0.000012697002,0.0015616626,0.000104951454,0.00000981253,0.00023419032,0.067574754,0.00013326263,0.00035398224,0.90367335,0.013816274,0.012501919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007826716,0.000026925216,0.008435153,0.000544292,0.000012785983,0.00035968694,0.048160315,0.00025562217,0.0007326502,0.06279813,0.8786042,0.00006236905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2566457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35792196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2566457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01404872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009241627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51030374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318612073","doi":"10.1177/09646639231153134","title":"Re-viewing Video Evidence and Police Violence in the Criminal Courts in Turkey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Impunity; Criminology; Trespass; Law; Law enforcement; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.1348693409045353,"score_gpt":0.4216770394723221,"score_spread":0.28680769856778676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318612073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9860681,0.0007975098,0.00017912366,0.0011068336,0.00002654391,0.00001046966,0.000028011877,0.000003737051,0.011779689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987425,0.0003154596,0.000077169534,0.0001050996,0.000008715569,0.0000033893384,0.000015929072,0.0000031061827,0.00072858913],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676716,0.0015101809,0.00017144943,0.00030340432,0.0006922845,0.0005555428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702317,0.0011118411,0.0008684839,0.00010578715,0.0005789677,0.00031184094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014447537,0.00024433297,0.00025901943,0.002708159,0.0039269025,0.0056729494,0.00070161425,0.0012124314,0.0031098728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071218605,0.00025037,0.00019217766,0.0017625977,0.0040166313,0.0026128562,0.0030190342,0.001346454,0.00024819458],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018583075,0.0002660663,0.12868844,0.00029514777,0.000048915055,0.016777677,0.76638246,0.00025800354,0.003542275,0.014509828,0.003995273,0.065050095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052800992,0.000067527806,0.08147659,0.00024929747,0.000025287136,0.0022703924,0.8971245,0.0002566066,0.0005543863,0.0011848289,0.016747983,0.000037229955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03309031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044930242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03309031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040944265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020736163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06579536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318694147","doi":"10.32920/20422287.v1","title":"Technology on trial: facilitative and prejudicial effects of computer-generated animations on jurors’ legal judgments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Testimonial; Congruence (geometry); Social psychology; Animation; Narrative; Modalities; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Advertising; Art; Visual arts; Sociology","score_opus":0.04510241164885788,"score_gpt":0.34098170206073414,"score_spread":0.2958792904118763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318694147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99774146,0.00007902484,0.00011900358,0.000059959748,0.000012059937,0.000032286316,0.0000049285973,0.000005338729,0.0019459354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989378,0.00007414601,0.0004325998,0.00005418253,0.00001647547,0.000043355405,0.000007708124,0.000003306653,0.00043063844],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532,0.0035101294,0.00024832066,0.00028141768,0.00047519975,0.00016483627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.960085,0.03118271,0.00576163,0.0010481362,0.0007105685,0.0012120543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039210315,0.00022344533,0.0002492014,0.0003373414,0.0005215739,0.0010397165,0.00032283668,0.0005277019,0.0063354447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058991738,0.00019890851,0.00021516369,0.00016257293,0.0007187332,0.00056204444,0.00090675015,0.00057268795,0.0003673983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.037844967,0.012993685,0.33375394,0.0016273698,0.0006098489,0.0019047157,0.039061934,0.0037726073,0.11890893,0.0029612097,0.0021233063,0.44443747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00211744,0.029658334,0.90751445,0.0006802723,0.000634628,0.0009568227,0.015614334,0.0063709915,0.026410902,0.0028015084,0.0070582177,0.00018206568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007938301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001052356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063354447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035020817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004938455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02119416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318694148","doi":"10.32920/20422287","title":"Technology on trial: facilitative and prejudicial effects of computer-generated animations on jurors’ legal judgments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Testimonial; Congruence (geometry); Social psychology; Animation; Narrative; Modalities; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Advertising","score_opus":0.04510241164885788,"score_gpt":0.34098170206073414,"score_spread":0.2958792904118763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318694148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99774146,0.00007902484,0.00011900358,0.000059959748,0.000012059937,0.000032286316,0.0000049285973,0.000005338729,0.0019459354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989378,0.00007414601,0.0004325998,0.00005418253,0.00001647547,0.000043355405,0.000007708124,0.000003306653,0.00043063844],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532,0.0035101294,0.00024832066,0.00028141768,0.00047519975,0.00016483627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.960085,0.03118271,0.00576163,0.0010481362,0.0007105685,0.0012120543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039210315,0.00022344533,0.0002492014,0.0003373414,0.0005215739,0.0010397165,0.00032283668,0.0005277019,0.0063354447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058991738,0.00019890851,0.00021516369,0.00016257293,0.0007187332,0.00056204444,0.00090675015,0.00057268795,0.0003673983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.037844967,0.012993685,0.33375394,0.0016273698,0.0006098489,0.0019047157,0.039061934,0.0037726073,0.11890893,0.0029612097,0.0021233063,0.44443747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00211744,0.029658334,0.90751445,0.0006802723,0.000634628,0.0009568227,0.015614334,0.0063709915,0.026410902,0.0028015084,0.0070582177,0.00018206568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007938301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001052356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063354447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035020817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004938455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02119416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319585966","doi":"10.32920/22057208.v1","title":"Tied Hands? A Doctrinal and Policy Argument for the Validity of Advance Consent","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisprudence; Argument (complex analysis); Autonomy; Political science; Supreme court; Informed consent; Consciousness; Psychology; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.12838646047458846,"score_gpt":0.40788012277145574,"score_spread":0.2794936622968673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319585966","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026570179,0.002308059,0.039325994,0.6411897,0.0012491763,0.00012207367,0.000100494195,0.00004752001,0.28908676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8876937,0.001082083,0.0101907775,0.08395018,0.00159618,0.0004093348,0.000049087466,0.000057150057,0.014971439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94200444,0.03328879,0.002129343,0.006687555,0.012014615,0.0038752467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8995485,0.07735926,0.0048227455,0.00883575,0.0073351664,0.0020986262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049026027,0.00057906087,0.0010026643,0.0018806009,0.011356515,0.011835937,0.0040708105,0.032081526,0.0057551805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11645746,0.0008254475,0.0010515096,0.0015318977,0.08605015,0.019456837,0.007876315,0.028229313,0.0012286918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006413662,0.000008177751,0.000075809796,0.000007845693,0.0000017424791,0.000024330691,0.00073883485,0.00005867073,0.000019442401,0.9972675,0.00096570427,0.00082547823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035966394,0.000013602311,0.00014780984,0.000116296644,0.0000067568153,0.000045878565,0.0006861284,0.00040962722,0.00018125729,0.98074615,0.017593462,0.000017084729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011267646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004438194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049026027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009170004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018300926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25927752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319825954","doi":"","title":"First Nations Perspectives in Law-Making About Voluntary Assisted Dying.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law reform; Legislation; Sophistication; Political science; Law; Voluntary association; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.034066272509098466,"score_gpt":0.27955588624543204,"score_spread":0.24548961373633357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319825954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17575945,0.05932106,0.0060732644,0.3691098,0.004129014,0.00014884435,0.00005987543,0.000044625252,0.385354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91432756,0.01801681,0.002226429,0.03490482,0.00036978524,0.000107181324,0.000027584252,0.000026178112,0.029993612],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98447937,0.0110383425,0.00056931085,0.00063005614,0.0019493765,0.0013335248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97986794,0.015393198,0.001065756,0.00044290783,0.001503632,0.0017264893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020942714,0.00025455994,0.0003787186,0.0013355357,0.020374577,0.008348113,0.001210446,0.005583935,0.0033464404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021338858,0.00030093122,0.00037328622,0.0014384333,0.03460654,0.008607927,0.0088102715,0.009647073,0.00028344768],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046851287,0.000007412869,0.00039938168,0.00017852888,0.0000026351058,0.00041577232,0.8298099,0.000029845784,0.00016257426,0.15724641,0.0035296185,0.008213237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033699835,0.000043709948,0.0030639342,0.0014205215,0.0000101763035,0.0008082197,0.60481083,0.00008739235,0.00021138525,0.033362627,0.3561426,0.00003530549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06514106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10427457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06514106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013048671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019431531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12952375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319995929","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4335273","title":"French Fries Are Meat: The Legal Poetics of Getting from Law to Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Poetics; Economic Justice; French fries; Law; Law and literature; Political science; Literature; Art; Poetry; Chemistry; Food science","score_opus":0.014031512950290988,"score_gpt":0.28310407976008656,"score_spread":0.2690725668097956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319995929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042780213,0.01255248,0.0030967598,0.23418044,0.0016445081,0.000014347178,0.000101237354,0.000067810215,0.7055622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9272689,0.0021326826,0.0008520343,0.014176216,0.0008028329,0.000017610193,0.000023172854,0.00011370846,0.054612707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585587,0.0028332938,0.000045694323,0.00027392627,0.00035984957,0.0006313822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659616,0.0022878957,0.000186442,0.00018586895,0.0004169825,0.00032671078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044422406,0.00042871755,0.0003487073,0.0016693781,0.020609008,0.015664928,0.0010323451,0.008527785,0.0107255755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009476819,0.0002488151,0.00031467518,0.0016802553,0.03760151,0.008901635,0.0024725113,0.0056011006,0.001092409],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022123206,0.00000987132,0.00027736402,0.000020753554,0.00000413854,0.00014593088,0.04438347,0.000038428436,0.000054758173,0.9303814,0.02029913,0.004362616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019639756,0.000029476663,0.0022102178,0.00025255975,0.000014304478,0.0003142607,0.10528248,0.00023610576,0.00018072446,0.31213272,0.5792835,0.000044052453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14302105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1591494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14302105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011171413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060534063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28437716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320031701","doi":"10.1017/s0012217322000312","title":"Fictions in Legal Reasoning","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogue","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01685881350928302,"score_gpt":0.2811778597678772,"score_spread":0.26431904625859415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320031701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053431902,0.0055172043,0.16320948,0.058474626,0.001117414,0.00016562168,0.00020714324,0.00033000216,0.7175467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678371,0.00097502465,0.017837629,0.0021258953,0.00031484518,0.00009819762,0.00010582494,0.00009475933,0.010610675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97908807,0.015697027,0.0006141469,0.0013052669,0.0024141558,0.00088135304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.964225,0.028992381,0.0015720113,0.0021441414,0.0024925238,0.0005739227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014723763,0.0007832622,0.00077938644,0.0033421302,0.006643709,0.009788058,0.0021618702,0.0060764304,0.012774164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035096418,0.000644102,0.0012725252,0.002033487,0.066129126,0.017182223,0.008267992,0.0073354794,0.0014320763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058435276,0.0000050643766,0.00006088666,0.00003163995,0.000002850807,0.00004746821,0.0035812303,0.0002004499,0.000037160713,0.99351877,0.0006596543,0.0018489994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000122858755,0.0000070112046,0.00007452951,0.00008397722,0.0000059675795,0.000070315175,0.0013050215,0.00086452736,0.00023124427,0.9761469,0.021188172,0.000010119964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032974994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001676446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014723763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006477953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003956875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07786763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320305236","doi":"10.1353/cdr.2022.0025","title":"Communal Justice in Shakespeare's England: Drama, Law, Emotion by Penelope Geng","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative drama","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Drama; Economic Justice; Rhetoric; Jurisdiction; Law; Legal fiction; Political science; Legal profession; Legal education; Professionalization; Sociology; History; Literature; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.046733050795209716,"score_gpt":0.3331299264671244,"score_spread":0.2863968756719147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320305236","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01250896,0.62717986,0.00044332753,0.11197811,0.015604342,0.000033201497,0.00011013794,0.000051249488,0.23209085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21322376,0.2355972,0.00047180598,0.022027956,0.007160243,0.000118549746,0.00013918361,0.00010735397,0.52115387],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950325,0.00020439936,0.000012312948,0.000056889006,0.00014906334,0.00007414469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994752,0.00026092527,0.000032856813,0.000015979113,0.00010889334,0.00010619659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051570917,0.00054672395,0.0004994329,0.0006585621,0.0043940614,0.004716659,0.000565846,0.0018121153,0.016382964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013019422,0.00025765292,0.00016599795,0.0013364288,0.004655055,0.0036684722,0.0020571603,0.0027981314,0.0025937473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002480708,0.000034244382,0.00045986267,0.0004257474,0.0000074058944,0.00038175745,0.050437905,0.00006845784,0.00017179389,0.033166185,0.8659679,0.048853863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004120062,0.000010803673,0.0036632034,0.000821741,0.0000032470014,0.00023569896,0.025265425,0.000027997055,0.000044139702,0.002857882,0.96705127,0.000014427024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054611314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08704352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054611314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035770277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024954635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10858691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320910638","doi":"10.7202/1096265ar","title":"Robertson, Colin (2016): Mulltilingual Law: A Framework for Analysis and Understanding. London: Routledge, 273 p.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meta Journal des traducteurs","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.08838403240207307,"score_gpt":0.34913697675857686,"score_spread":0.26075294435650376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320910638","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010700442,0.7083507,0.02766694,0.13869293,0.0037779654,0.00014423559,0.001470113,0.0003583273,0.118468665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08348918,0.71315074,0.058136992,0.029770624,0.00513502,0.0008564224,0.0019340283,0.0015838008,0.10594322],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947101,0.0025180622,0.00050488714,0.0005016761,0.001503332,0.00026187478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99177647,0.0051664207,0.0007739021,0.00044416887,0.0015752877,0.0002637611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00728966,0.0013748843,0.0012411962,0.007266313,0.0042565633,0.011370206,0.0021875198,0.0074918657,0.024199938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015795646,0.0014996384,0.00091475615,0.010695862,0.013416725,0.024727961,0.004057942,0.008446498,0.009241261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036717967,0.000021183512,0.00032892797,0.0011401565,0.000022281536,0.0001771461,0.009537132,0.00025309355,0.00018317204,0.36043552,0.52026856,0.10759607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012095365,0.000009280819,0.00076973275,0.0033376825,0.00001648852,0.00021559391,0.002915581,0.0001024633,0.00019263996,0.1685515,0.8238352,0.00004161676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041707776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058572393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041707776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007130703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008761206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08293003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321456584","doi":"10.1038/d41586-023-00486-3","title":"Mastodon: a move to publicly owned scholarly knowledge","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Nature","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.026720710624889198,"score_gpt":0.3227386890634017,"score_spread":0.2960179784385125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321456584","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002160368,0.0004497339,0.0004337184,0.95331657,0.008486753,0.00006437273,0.00008872845,0.000080913785,0.034918822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0090913465,0.0001780169,0.00034253954,0.86674666,0.004889448,0.00014826652,0.00003594002,0.00006525696,0.1185025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98129386,0.002788153,0.0011795299,0.0022690005,0.0074747815,0.0049947375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9606239,0.02370013,0.0019298674,0.002215434,0.0038357528,0.0076948865],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0160252,0.00080110435,0.0015556522,0.0015689938,0.027777655,0.02535759,0.005915703,0.24677154,0.03751108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049867872,0.001839962,0.0028846173,0.0016150274,0.012077662,0.015650906,0.018111637,0.09597468,0.009986083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007459098,0.0000788497,0.0006103661,0.00005863111,0.000019168976,0.0016823659,0.001560793,0.00006941685,0.000579447,0.11099719,0.8778672,0.006402047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001320989,0.000063458254,0.0016117414,0.0002053028,0.000031077958,0.00040764245,0.002062185,0.0005834535,0.0004606441,0.03558282,0.958778,0.000081480684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032194376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08412076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9940843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010526603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035092365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12548709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321512462","doi":"10.1386/jptv_00083_1","title":"Resentment and ressentiment as motivating forces in Better Call Saul","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Popular Television","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resentment; Character (mathematics); Feeling; Brother; Hatred; Psychoanalysis; Law; Aesthetics; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.016447337143748596,"score_gpt":0.3065542543958672,"score_spread":0.2901069172521186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321512462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53067136,0.0019064326,0.0076014423,0.012122791,0.00043114886,0.00004630796,0.000015209627,0.00009782643,0.4471074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931357,0.00022783733,0.00048901513,0.00053079077,0.00009276536,0.000014855711,0.0000044779385,0.000024542709,0.0054800226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739945,0.0017226012,0.000035441713,0.00012416481,0.0003918794,0.00032648366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976896,0.0009399672,0.00059726444,0.00014764509,0.00017449216,0.00045106292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019021945,0.0003734779,0.00015052292,0.00095371937,0.0040031592,0.005911097,0.00058381516,0.0017270863,0.0026541348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032124952,0.00018426606,0.00030540538,0.00033624956,0.020149155,0.004517388,0.0044457386,0.003050994,0.00028618754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010635505,0.00016578769,0.0055701886,0.00012948502,0.000023087041,0.0012411567,0.388085,0.0002506211,0.0033732231,0.5748747,0.0035354127,0.022645023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005479962,0.0003250034,0.050156284,0.00045728285,0.00005980398,0.003025411,0.46519378,0.0014293401,0.0042839632,0.12977342,0.3450569,0.0001840383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001232074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024620641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005911097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018823132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008679119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013657212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322712164","doi":"10.7202/1095490ar","title":"Les rationalités du droit entre formalisme, empirisme et rematérialisation : Reading Max Weber’s Sociology of Law Oxford University Press, 2020, 195 pp., (trad. par Matthew Philpotts) de Hubert Treiber","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Lex Electronica","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Philosophy; Humanities; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.028954142835415454,"score_gpt":0.28695276074306614,"score_spread":0.25799861790765066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322712164","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041495846,0.4790581,0.023658527,0.13596503,0.0041923802,0.000047020138,0.00047018548,0.00015250951,0.35230672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27263102,0.37386635,0.023362178,0.020582493,0.010601064,0.00046703682,0.00077040493,0.00054730545,0.29717213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843127,0.0007453244,0.00008457815,0.00021335378,0.00041582214,0.00010960078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985234,0.0010107518,0.00015398953,0.000097091724,0.00016883254,0.00004597052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025208401,0.0012745544,0.0007714409,0.0025994466,0.0017232291,0.008295492,0.0009798898,0.0032209577,0.009970345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045791953,0.0006686246,0.00035959264,0.0036670538,0.014636342,0.017129833,0.0017658293,0.003660462,0.0035570203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020147945,0.000011871484,0.0000777537,0.00018191454,0.000005206874,0.0000640207,0.0024739562,0.0002280871,0.00016472864,0.88445693,0.082357146,0.029958112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010415422,0.000012912997,0.00040090902,0.00083243405,0.0000047531908,0.00006413602,0.0014057161,0.00018951965,0.00024434522,0.6144254,0.3823887,0.000020698337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007129791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072608287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009970345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057062428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003461556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041401803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323026464","doi":"10.2991/978-2-494069-97-8_56","title":"A Cynical Theory and Wicked Men: The Origins of Classical Realism’s Pessimism and Cynicism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cynicism; Pessimism; Realism; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.030835400759256084,"score_gpt":0.302550185236592,"score_spread":0.27171478447733594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323026464","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.138179,0.019631954,0.048909385,0.43637833,0.0016858123,0.00006204462,0.00007060255,0.00011807611,0.35496482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97998947,0.0014748889,0.002944154,0.009504055,0.000684707,0.000034472254,0.000012150451,0.000050654944,0.005305381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897425,0.0070514097,0.0001716615,0.00066952617,0.0017823238,0.0005826096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856103,0.010240849,0.0010467089,0.0010133433,0.0013574446,0.00073133205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011230891,0.00057739683,0.0007188928,0.0023113515,0.007088752,0.009430234,0.0015042,0.0047274535,0.0016223182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016028741,0.000472358,0.00056236004,0.0011669213,0.0837621,0.010762674,0.0055043935,0.012070263,0.00032044674],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011018894,0.000010311537,0.00019805685,0.000016463966,0.000005311155,0.000052054907,0.010751003,0.00022075503,0.000046412253,0.9849747,0.0015690234,0.002144806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008525701,0.000007457739,0.00016218971,0.000047804988,0.000002104523,0.000025654921,0.001874063,0.0006660158,0.000055276447,0.9885561,0.008583474,0.000011428577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00634762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038252922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011298883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011298883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037219648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08197951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323058830","doi":"10.1017/jbr.2022.200","title":"Penelope Geng. Communal Justice in Shakespeare's England: Drama, Law, and Emotion. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2021. Pp. 280. $75.00 (cloth).","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of British Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Drama; Economic Justice; Media studies; Content (measure theory); History; Sociology; Political science; Law; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.024226419747696844,"score_gpt":0.28877512371686154,"score_spread":0.2645487039691647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323058830","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004637781,0.73575974,0.0010841432,0.097426556,0.0037863203,0.00002315137,0.00065150164,0.00009736676,0.15653346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25586727,0.36690462,0.0011686136,0.0077845515,0.0018184757,0.00007273195,0.0004162284,0.00018242086,0.36578512],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996854,0.00013212895,0.000015166026,0.000021591892,0.00008614012,0.000059556718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991456,0.0004088877,0.00006157964,0.00003089481,0.0001815124,0.00017143588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064822,0.000648968,0.00036272456,0.0015385207,0.0036702887,0.0027761275,0.0007097932,0.0021150743,0.029241592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024218778,0.00041897138,0.00019281692,0.0017145582,0.004049329,0.0049437946,0.0011205582,0.0018798636,0.00423604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038154125,0.0000101617825,0.00040329754,0.00043022298,0.0000065959844,0.00020676854,0.0155464895,0.00007591725,0.00014096664,0.03724775,0.8811388,0.06475485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007319079,0.000013039457,0.0076917843,0.0011029463,0.0000099508425,0.00023826447,0.02051327,0.00005203209,0.00022371182,0.01522662,0.95490354,0.00001744959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12926622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32991406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12926622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038775173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041474113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25702757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323340186","doi":"10.7202/1096891ar","title":"François Colona d’Istria, Philosophie du droit et pratique des juristes, Paris, Dalloz, 2021, 307 p., ISBN 9766-2-247-20663-6.","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012955091080323698,"score_gpt":0.2580142407198984,"score_spread":0.24505914963957473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323340186","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003350299,0.88665974,0.0009735883,0.020889372,0.005489535,0.00001897898,0.0008269906,0.00015507272,0.0846516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01449311,0.62047493,0.002494527,0.0035776247,0.0038283896,0.00009506296,0.00091303233,0.00038337454,0.35373998],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876666,0.00021546317,0.00008954473,0.00025526926,0.00051562814,0.00015744212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891365,0.00040226622,0.00015900223,0.00005523536,0.00036368112,0.00010621215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012560568,0.0026903332,0.001137274,0.004953104,0.0027249062,0.0061206343,0.0011397325,0.0035824226,0.081882164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023722867,0.0010693315,0.00062646874,0.007911995,0.0028212483,0.009182277,0.0016519144,0.004236875,0.040783722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053390773,0.000010353037,0.00022450525,0.00060929096,0.000015346744,0.000104885155,0.0010581414,0.00009375718,0.0001630209,0.025468709,0.8991965,0.07300215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004230956,0.0000034172022,0.0005614236,0.00032607018,0.000003443258,0.00009857435,0.0002854864,0.000018292127,0.000048622896,0.0024950043,0.9961486,0.0000068423183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08786949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13142362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08786949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009103872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2739231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323518926","doi":"10.17118/11143/20010","title":"L'espace du droit et ses limites : la sculpture Spirit of Haida Gwaii et le wampum à deux rangs (two row wampum) comme images du pluralisme juridique au Canada","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.007574114590910313,"score_gpt":0.2081494791920379,"score_spread":0.2005753646011276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323518926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13775966,0.026100624,0.0028221502,0.2255887,0.0016383432,0.000033596825,0.00025758194,0.00013639,0.605663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.817898,0.0062320256,0.0007386558,0.011820127,0.00027565172,0.00002442028,0.000052485324,0.000112165326,0.16284649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849856,0.00024146673,0.000013634031,0.0001501665,0.00060340465,0.0004927222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912757,0.00021990646,0.000058367965,0.000037887025,0.00029223392,0.00026395044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011246111,0.00042115577,0.00029904587,0.0011257393,0.02601061,0.014666816,0.001266693,0.003039001,0.0051278574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024954288,0.00025960835,0.00022325068,0.0017022168,0.02925236,0.0046104407,0.0038896312,0.0053604404,0.0004730882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038854727,0.00001163606,0.0013162442,0.00006649863,0.0000063350612,0.0005824017,0.3822735,0.00013451077,0.0004392006,0.4970582,0.09655879,0.021513768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007702294,0.000009035795,0.0033169016,0.00024697604,0.000010087948,0.00020911836,0.24783656,0.00021001452,0.00024036758,0.021954373,0.72591275,0.000046121222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95179313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9746045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055502437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055502437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048255086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40270025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323660995","doi":"10.33137/ic.v15i.40362","title":"Biographical Sketch of The Honourable Mr. Justice Frank Iacobucci","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Italian Canadiana","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sketch; Economic Justice; Sociology; Art; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.01864125733735209,"score_gpt":0.274362440650665,"score_spread":0.2557211833133129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323660995","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001520882,0.051744644,0.003234435,0.5690959,0.18152966,0.00010204108,0.0015257233,0.00042787212,0.19081885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017857965,0.015298041,0.0016559956,0.109575115,0.050443497,0.00010866826,0.0004348157,0.0005192209,0.80410665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878305,0.00034359057,0.00005051179,0.0002389696,0.00042657813,0.00015725876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960448,0.0010553242,0.000214767,0.00029189765,0.0018250042,0.0005681478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016047613,0.0009105874,0.0007581168,0.0018520241,0.0054192455,0.004372175,0.0010307152,0.0026901453,0.03584075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010421269,0.0004440772,0.00042222688,0.0012872908,0.0022876794,0.004139706,0.0022591862,0.009006224,0.024599703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072005973,0.0000036360098,0.000030005152,0.000017561422,9.871646e-7,0.000051167346,0.00026933756,0.000014978023,0.000053809283,0.004670611,0.9908528,0.004027997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.627552e-7,0.0000023292082,0.00006649896,0.00003182407,7.34308e-7,0.00007964896,0.00018846394,0.000021917236,0.000034444995,0.00072637014,0.99884295,0.000003902215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022440838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031041665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97755915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032228364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002850712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11989927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323855143","doi":"10.1177/17438721231154449","title":"Omniscient Narrative Modes in Law: From Trial Strategy to the Fellow-Servant Rule","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Interpretation (philosophy); Argumentation theory; Doctrine; Epistemology; Servant; Psychology; Law; Sociology; Political science; Linguistics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.05323597754017819,"score_gpt":0.299588979468228,"score_spread":0.2463530019280498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323855143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40107226,0.007497333,0.06838656,0.0387421,0.0005920015,0.00010866332,0.000067766516,0.0000883574,0.48344493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922255,0.000806342,0.0022898347,0.00040544127,0.00005138695,0.00002541605,0.0000113361675,0.00002271327,0.0041620317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896199,0.008971858,0.00022293939,0.00032891857,0.00058678474,0.00026954993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99009776,0.0072647673,0.00094947487,0.00068352435,0.000623516,0.00038097505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075949356,0.00045056525,0.00032912978,0.0012733581,0.0054906565,0.009872367,0.0011208919,0.0019704115,0.0022486344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023066357,0.00028872202,0.0002657317,0.0008185734,0.03914866,0.011866683,0.0049789706,0.0033073544,0.00036213148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027750037,0.000011191346,0.0005627027,0.00004738879,0.0000035635435,0.00033983245,0.19183193,0.00013413596,0.00016470942,0.79840314,0.00094687456,0.0075266347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036215402,0.000093308554,0.0013688415,0.00060846796,0.000017042477,0.0011677098,0.20632802,0.0014538068,0.0013141631,0.6534883,0.13408464,0.000039560455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020927158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021409548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009872367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002871598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001993552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04016632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W435701220","doi":"10.3138/9781442681354","title":"The Genetic Imaginary: DNA in the Canadian Criminal Justice System","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; The Imaginary; Political science; Crime control; Economic Justice; Civil liberties; Law; Empowerment; Criminal procedure; Law and economics; Criminology; Sociology; Politics; Psychology","score_opus":0.019801315212243494,"score_gpt":0.2363861310479696,"score_spread":0.2165848158357261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W435701220","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013673278,0.029110104,0.0025186462,0.17277727,0.0025738045,0.000069085014,0.00024372624,0.00009606846,0.7789381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38810137,0.026838109,0.0041756458,0.04097999,0.0005996198,0.00009251083,0.00027735694,0.0001311094,0.53880423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714977,0.00042028233,0.000040424264,0.00019009502,0.0013136158,0.00088589033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984132,0.00034234935,0.00003709404,0.00005388418,0.0008897188,0.0002637783],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017747884,0.00057820004,0.00031249633,0.0028096857,0.03377492,0.010757401,0.0019283602,0.0040934314,0.0056726695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039849454,0.00032298415,0.00036488683,0.0038037477,0.033404842,0.0031400702,0.0022921578,0.0039882967,0.00063786417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008004494,0.000006733784,0.0005092369,0.00004090727,0.0000042886627,0.00017790862,0.017677555,0.00030953452,0.00008756204,0.8307859,0.12799875,0.02239365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000846619,0.000006484311,0.0018529145,0.00021747331,0.00001462754,0.00009681135,0.016033405,0.0003244327,0.00013516702,0.07450554,0.90675235,0.00005232706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9933142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99611557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9662251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18416792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20185097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9462496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360619652","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198863397.003.0006","title":"Sexual Assault Law in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sexual assault; Criminal code; Legislature; Law; Political science; Criminal law; Criminology; Psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Poison control; Medicine; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.03103513511099942,"score_gpt":0.2625122853167397,"score_spread":0.23147715020574028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360619652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022439402,0.03433249,0.00046852024,0.046506308,0.0013623585,0.00010809942,0.00083734747,0.00009574448,0.8938499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31112236,0.037240464,0.0010465257,0.02019187,0.00035265784,0.00007284331,0.0005043128,0.00007601274,0.62939304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985618,0.0000722552,0.000031253952,0.00009565817,0.00072017557,0.00051877886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988159,0.00014784235,0.00003320404,0.000028462988,0.00064869365,0.00032590757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062496116,0.00041132217,0.00025029056,0.0027336928,0.014327046,0.005056485,0.0013649877,0.0031021924,0.017988892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016503548,0.00043898443,0.00042195688,0.0039543104,0.004924153,0.0008877829,0.0015885577,0.002576565,0.0010666273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011569336,0.00003634287,0.0024288779,0.0001752908,0.000008288797,0.0010040969,0.007627091,0.00067697547,0.00039746394,0.63721603,0.30556306,0.044854954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004996861,0.0000069268904,0.004126136,0.0001904323,0.0000065405657,0.00015687091,0.00236735,0.00022462495,0.00011904965,0.005365579,0.9874046,0.000026981445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15773493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15773493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1988095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9769081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360619720","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192855480.001.0001","title":"European Constitutional Imaginaries","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.028388403613991163,"score_gpt":0.2899733669692613,"score_spread":0.26158496335527015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360619720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002532209,0.0094232,0.0012179186,0.012789672,0.00076315907,0.000005729971,0.000045228295,0.000027855176,0.973195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5563951,0.013589546,0.0023164917,0.0116971545,0.0013717248,0.00011587468,0.00031386683,0.00015451953,0.41404572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978715,0.00093675294,0.000073282616,0.0002628464,0.00062784966,0.00022776202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891734,0.00060618855,0.000045975677,0.00016725333,0.00018796942,0.0000752538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00238272,0.000522548,0.0003331857,0.00184651,0.0034949041,0.008860976,0.0006576775,0.003161164,0.010608207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037502083,0.00023274295,0.00029304548,0.0020557705,0.0141634755,0.0061930954,0.0030659998,0.0043452736,0.0012067684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014174701,0.0000027199792,0.0000071396003,0.0000068705403,3.2317112e-7,0.0000091819,0.0005366679,0.000052929674,0.000011907286,0.9913344,0.0060415175,0.0019949703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044611434,0.0000047849035,0.00010415703,0.00017225457,0.000001463211,0.00004914998,0.0014192949,0.00022588602,0.0001004317,0.3955262,0.60238665,0.0000052979613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061315564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043245815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010608207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009469625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002427779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06870729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361283823","doi":"10.1017/cls.2023.5","title":"Irene Van OorschotThe Law Multiple: Judgement and Knowledge in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021, 205 pp.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Law; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Physics; Quantum mechanics","score_opus":0.01639494944077443,"score_gpt":0.2629463086062042,"score_spread":0.24655135916542978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361283823","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028789145,0.9220778,0.0017823168,0.030984063,0.0018052757,0.000013259916,0.00031657808,0.00007873105,0.042654026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029439233,0.7966922,0.0056060865,0.0069861053,0.0030445815,0.00020994064,0.00073826825,0.00034242318,0.1569411],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976882,0.00075786357,0.00030239427,0.00026267284,0.0007979003,0.00019094716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99503845,0.003397053,0.0003252161,0.00022727613,0.0007475295,0.00026445376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029654712,0.002358296,0.0017068824,0.0051011494,0.002115921,0.007181725,0.002446101,0.0061259214,0.032820936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010285238,0.002474076,0.0007481217,0.0067190765,0.0066796485,0.020965269,0.0025147782,0.0054018125,0.014447343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052267467,0.0000266836,0.00031802466,0.0014628312,0.000031365613,0.00019719444,0.004401944,0.00030391364,0.0001636715,0.09320034,0.74722916,0.15261273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015857557,0.000009264895,0.0018952271,0.0041369423,0.000016885275,0.00028075321,0.0024936453,0.00020520433,0.00013912508,0.08325898,0.9075164,0.00003176562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05585659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08553913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05585659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006393032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008287945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111062944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361288120","doi":"10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1398","title":"A critical analysis of the standard of consent in rape law in India","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Oñati Socio-legal Series","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Informed consent; Interpretation (philosophy); Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.017596799818915154,"score_gpt":0.3228849770887778,"score_spread":0.3052881772698626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361288120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2110318,0.01867288,0.04000291,0.15692094,0.0020171306,0.0005337514,0.0001852949,0.00015198297,0.5704833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97956455,0.0025438988,0.0033446862,0.0055535412,0.0002467359,0.000089717556,0.00002467638,0.000032019965,0.008600102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9679785,0.01783424,0.0016096673,0.0013881758,0.008564321,0.0026250833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96331966,0.027610084,0.0016072117,0.0017634393,0.005223874,0.00047559175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020408463,0.00038962538,0.00044124032,0.0036650698,0.012207016,0.012655562,0.00224752,0.003927628,0.0017366549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033359636,0.00042813006,0.00076518586,0.002625491,0.04887535,0.005285685,0.0069273873,0.008442932,0.00021947156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015257746,0.0000058505907,0.00029573272,0.00007478029,0.000004497459,0.00022308606,0.03311947,0.0001831919,0.00027200225,0.9591722,0.0014588495,0.00517509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025357574,0.00014087926,0.005538139,0.0015579553,0.00011048557,0.0009256223,0.124088965,0.0012683396,0.0057164836,0.48745254,0.37295282,0.00022241527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03480939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036000803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03480939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027963443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028396826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20288992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361989170","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.34.2.07","title":"Trans Rights, Trans Justice: A Conversation About Key Trans Legal Issues in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Social justice; Backlash; Sociology; Law and economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.013871793585896868,"score_gpt":0.24039176472040483,"score_spread":0.22651997113450795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361989170","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038735516,0.010070016,0.00091983593,0.8908146,0.005675488,0.00009985767,0.00014919146,0.000036459613,0.053499047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.559896,0.009848052,0.0015611384,0.37387228,0.0011241675,0.00016669302,0.000083296334,0.00014765197,0.053300694],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831129,0.0050590867,0.000286004,0.001190248,0.0033310377,0.0070208088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851563,0.0055354903,0.00033390263,0.00017031959,0.0025790716,0.006224909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013419819,0.0008877884,0.0012148804,0.0022654212,0.12436713,0.02207112,0.0045634876,0.022618758,0.007416302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015872324,0.0010133354,0.00097188994,0.0038863942,0.03421725,0.00805829,0.008882216,0.03194738,0.00045401003],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102041515,0.00009423376,0.0027074772,0.00024469057,0.000030909832,0.0022915364,0.5400358,0.0003571289,0.00092950667,0.17313293,0.26180315,0.018270642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014678771,0.00002435278,0.0018734871,0.00032409953,0.000015673468,0.00020227014,0.47665867,0.0002690064,0.00020307972,0.0064933933,0.5137967,0.00012467343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99014413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99516076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22614734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22614734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27514043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8975594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362576175","doi":"10.22215/etd/2023-15451","title":"Towards a critique of state secrecy: Uncovering the rhetorical practices of secret keepers and their legitimization by the discourse of law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Secrecy; Rhetorical question; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.026495095818576907,"score_gpt":0.3599963414134633,"score_spread":0.3335012455948864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362576175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38906538,0.013150495,0.02311551,0.11788058,0.00095892436,0.000060675156,0.000055488883,0.00007090587,0.455642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990549,0.002007628,0.00094472466,0.0012630293,0.00015175014,0.000019561208,0.000009017359,0.000034311484,0.0050210496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.986522,0.010676625,0.00017615878,0.00045770762,0.0016059818,0.0005615072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96884155,0.026314223,0.0017011749,0.0009554027,0.001760705,0.0004269379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01472615,0.00048134607,0.0005294835,0.0033697132,0.01255584,0.017177885,0.0010147619,0.0029211754,0.001967326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018895619,0.00029982178,0.0003258301,0.0032384142,0.08127853,0.011674586,0.0052620177,0.0062188692,0.000372085],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010713471,0.00000825859,0.00053243164,0.00004407655,0.000002808081,0.0000972808,0.35237914,0.000116758325,0.00020233818,0.64136827,0.0011658386,0.00407215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019265357,0.000032351738,0.0016603849,0.0010023912,0.000020788904,0.00021829689,0.48167747,0.0010315584,0.0017153564,0.34146428,0.17112255,0.00003519275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018894466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016035646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018894466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013833524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012388212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10036969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365808964","doi":"10.5206/fpq/2022.2.14239","title":"A Phenomenological Approach to Sexual Consent","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.06278451458248457,"score_gpt":0.30018946108267863,"score_spread":0.23740494650019406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365808964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037033085,0.017816791,0.29070076,0.1484705,0.0035361622,0.001452165,0.00044217036,0.00014915952,0.5003992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8494417,0.012324281,0.0681877,0.02739813,0.0011871936,0.0035670297,0.00020737351,0.00010195116,0.037584648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9872005,0.010660416,0.00032291972,0.0005958214,0.0007866156,0.00043374163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98512995,0.012066725,0.00066775014,0.0010417188,0.0005924696,0.00050142175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014316095,0.0008083882,0.0005392136,0.0030490682,0.007526273,0.009064113,0.0024313463,0.005044981,0.0042465725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01585332,0.0004936786,0.0008653702,0.003089018,0.05608323,0.015949098,0.006713186,0.0069147665,0.0005499631],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009638522,0.000015335947,0.00013911123,0.00008622255,0.000002278946,0.000119467295,0.04852138,0.00015936758,0.00010252187,0.9470564,0.0016887297,0.0020995666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024350966,0.000042705742,0.00019167697,0.00053358916,0.0000065246813,0.0005327002,0.060633346,0.0005207226,0.0002737371,0.7575636,0.17964986,0.000027124384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027434705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021187186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014316095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067042513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053474694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07571167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366121785","doi":"10.1177/1037969x231171461","title":"Legal Studies: First Nations Voice: What should it talk about, and who should listen?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternative Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Project commissioning; Law; Business; Publishing; Telecommunications; Computer science","score_opus":0.09465443253500973,"score_gpt":0.39461075853156075,"score_spread":0.29995632599655103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366121785","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009886105,0.016988803,0.0006209918,0.9269909,0.003941199,0.000012406109,0.000045471068,0.000014899189,0.041499168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54775304,0.017363148,0.0012567824,0.40353796,0.009594634,0.00016137367,0.0000918271,0.00011908814,0.020122064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9720691,0.02209275,0.00062387914,0.0010630426,0.0023044006,0.0018468973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9157758,0.06147877,0.0043892404,0.001755245,0.005846346,0.010754583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022551144,0.000389374,0.00082463067,0.002430093,0.017337782,0.022959927,0.0017891967,0.021244407,0.012910861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081530325,0.00031899396,0.00048862805,0.002767522,0.031914305,0.022272421,0.0068371175,0.021697838,0.0014357194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006380152,0.00015240663,0.0074614547,0.0008039669,0.000043146723,0.0006199672,0.20543298,0.000060028877,0.0004285405,0.4636126,0.26047072,0.06085037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028368018,0.00006973479,0.009800489,0.007668817,0.000046154386,0.00065321714,0.37662882,0.00014410811,0.00048748145,0.15043576,0.45392886,0.000108147746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01865817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031708762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022959927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009355514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019743256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11926329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367393438","doi":"10.1007/s11196-023-10011-4","title":"In the Search of Lost Justice: New Perspectives on Well-Trodden Pathways","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Volkswagen Foundation","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04995597240364435,"score_gpt":0.3637292717562438,"score_spread":0.31377329935259946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367393438","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029421581,0.009442954,0.046773236,0.11294166,0.0013402113,0.00013257378,0.0001372727,0.00010091791,0.79970956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.929787,0.0032744138,0.006914727,0.005248711,0.00050027296,0.00022174478,0.000057741963,0.00023654093,0.053758807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99285346,0.004078565,0.00021181293,0.00084537844,0.00072068156,0.0012900307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99362093,0.0036812914,0.00050274836,0.00073026813,0.0006976512,0.0007671354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0081027355,0.0008699649,0.0010619552,0.0036567634,0.018683003,0.02346712,0.0036202094,0.012393872,0.02220289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0191448,0.00060215726,0.00086947385,0.003378272,0.09427214,0.0334578,0.012626245,0.012976151,0.0015396659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030991794,0.000003067341,0.000017966797,0.000006825576,6.625598e-7,0.000022840859,0.0040212455,0.00003949683,0.000005427436,0.9948148,0.00048659416,0.0005777884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057546467,0.000004708251,0.000031599226,0.000051542647,0.000002107438,0.000032934924,0.0070184623,0.00012920862,0.00002489774,0.9700686,0.022622943,0.0000071842733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0155398045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01601914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02346712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010979215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012458203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07966018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367672203","doi":"10.7202/1098935ar","title":"Droit et soft ethics dans l’encadrement normatif de l’IA : une perspective pragmatiste","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Communitas","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Cégep André Laurendeau","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Pragmatism; Sociology; Pluralism (philosophy); Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Meta-ethics; Relation (database); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Information ethics; Computer science","score_opus":0.057761700763066574,"score_gpt":0.3866908506721168,"score_spread":0.3289291499090502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367672203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063994855,0.013095334,0.15164055,0.21001494,0.001260567,0.000082836836,0.00006194178,0.0001155339,0.5597335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95113,0.00394493,0.013935085,0.006373522,0.0005898666,0.00013451715,0.000019878365,0.00009002274,0.02378218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98121566,0.014143949,0.00039445056,0.0009689552,0.002544476,0.00073254533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871084,0.008633552,0.0010554006,0.0012476903,0.0013275464,0.00062743935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013310003,0.00064839795,0.0006256483,0.0021802546,0.006078784,0.012484407,0.0012232699,0.004860198,0.00257828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009602325,0.00035006512,0.00066125457,0.0016082061,0.07166828,0.0108866505,0.0056367507,0.008187019,0.0005114945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000415384,0.0000053233607,0.000089524096,0.000020358166,0.0000018896014,0.00002587578,0.005851553,0.00012511617,0.00007143516,0.9910182,0.000526757,0.0022598084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009900485,0.000029849156,0.00040552963,0.00021450072,0.0000058254373,0.00009054736,0.008354042,0.00072033406,0.00037553,0.91209173,0.07767811,0.000024101915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006862878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062956805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013310003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008784248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008705215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07039088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372325642","doi":"10.1017/9781108769327.008","title":"Recollection","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03735490457931566,"score_gpt":0.2309551949037743,"score_spread":0.19360029032445863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372325642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007656053,0.014991113,0.0025616384,0.026859026,0.08020867,0.00036187092,0.019794175,0.004158334,0.8502996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015898664,0.0032346782,0.00043363837,0.0029250402,0.0050258865,0.00009526593,0.0040286426,0.00095458876,0.9817123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987915,0.00012898377,0.00008139157,0.00018255526,0.0007193314,0.00009628265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99480164,0.0007087521,0.00016002657,0.0004628624,0.0035452764,0.00032157145],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079546607,0.0011825428,0.00091589167,0.0050905873,0.0016662872,0.0048809936,0.0016733499,0.0013715423,0.689744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009315534,0.00037052573,0.0006420108,0.004011587,0.0005737055,0.0034899372,0.0019981698,0.0021852935,0.6158031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067169935,0.0000038424923,0.000017300428,0.0000825085,7.691628e-7,0.000022020644,0.000029352559,0.000009473825,0.000045285757,0.000779522,0.97972417,0.019279037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011404853,0.000002556741,0.000051499035,0.00006471894,7.63065e-7,0.000027325772,0.000025598802,0.0000052696696,0.000040117015,0.00028492825,0.9994935,0.0000025436814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004514595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057928218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.689744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026934685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016258385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4425425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372325651","doi":"10.1017/9781108769327.007","title":"A Common Space of Legal Communication","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal realism; Semiotics; Legal profession; Indigenous; Legal practice; Legal formalism; Sociology; Empirical legal studies; Legal translation; Storytelling; Legal history; Philosophy of law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Narrative; Law; Epistemology; Comparative law; Black letter law; Linguistics; Philosophy; Private law","score_opus":0.032042845532811504,"score_gpt":0.24446181543035111,"score_spread":0.2124189698975396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372325651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01053909,0.005004996,0.020971842,0.016828133,0.00058509,0.00008138325,0.00005618372,0.00014601354,0.94578725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8314779,0.004220986,0.014265923,0.001916036,0.0006397971,0.00030733316,0.0001384917,0.00024747677,0.14678602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882258,0.007418619,0.00037383128,0.0009948103,0.0022089644,0.00077797816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99494064,0.0024869516,0.0003742732,0.00096305506,0.0007197544,0.0005152951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063988566,0.0006717658,0.00069755426,0.00407001,0.012075797,0.021796234,0.002022237,0.0058270134,0.014737376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008970126,0.0004037463,0.000629698,0.0040399325,0.05615337,0.026116394,0.015140573,0.0049100304,0.0024017491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024173285,0.0000044726976,0.000022200205,0.000025252011,0.0000012846565,0.00009493734,0.02574351,0.00005420376,0.00006694701,0.96621764,0.0021486431,0.0056184907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008720264,0.000017184202,0.00018817646,0.00044674415,0.0000056690833,0.000429275,0.04268843,0.0004721372,0.0002807096,0.58127654,0.37416476,0.000021657212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006812069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054390943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021796234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010173436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011460173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073813796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4375826129","doi":"10.1163/9789047410676_002","title":"Hermann Cohen’s Ethics","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.04996335042710803,"score_gpt":0.3174326817827002,"score_spread":0.26746933135559214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4375826129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055438867,0.041390087,0.006591601,0.28014237,0.0065477877,0.000042427964,0.00018828794,0.000075131844,0.65947837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54757136,0.017058656,0.007667802,0.15999644,0.010370797,0.0003624688,0.00012907792,0.00023668651,0.25660673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99421847,0.0029616572,0.00016528819,0.00079057744,0.0012671363,0.00059685245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724776,0.0016699663,0.00014749472,0.00024475745,0.00047382808,0.0002161541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004802151,0.00047969786,0.00046145212,0.000954176,0.006317878,0.006004316,0.00084889086,0.0072206296,0.0038966953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00797441,0.0002698566,0.0004023615,0.00083997,0.016235344,0.0030842563,0.002399303,0.0062421197,0.0015530074],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046833193,0.0000039952033,0.00004374592,0.000014253551,0.0000014532868,0.000019983716,0.0006472757,0.000049892416,0.000023163127,0.95546705,0.04198537,0.0017391851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071053264,0.0000047841722,0.00010097468,0.00011222325,0.000002474695,0.000051706626,0.0003902597,0.00017565144,0.000059961807,0.46066335,0.53842133,0.000010211083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009527875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066469163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009527875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008674592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068587484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06293887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376058617","doi":"10.7202/1098591ar","title":"Are Tents a “Home”? Extending Section 8 Privacy Rights for the Precariously Housed","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal doctrine; Doctrine; Law; Charter; Denial; Political science; Trespass; Sociology","score_opus":0.039203409888685155,"score_gpt":0.29823716596560423,"score_spread":0.2590337560769191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376058617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032516826,0.0040286584,0.0048653856,0.14541262,0.0023811078,0.00017036448,0.0012031986,0.00016060221,0.8092611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4260107,0.0035149818,0.004186525,0.17469132,0.0020737702,0.00054760324,0.0007636602,0.00014571792,0.38806576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99196917,0.0017760355,0.00039512815,0.00075572834,0.0027617135,0.0023423948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951126,0.002026846,0.00066415936,0.0007118601,0.001089957,0.00039459494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00509761,0.00037710692,0.00047539413,0.00041387026,0.0049428493,0.005208891,0.001764615,0.012849181,0.018334528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012220099,0.0007469282,0.0006540312,0.00048637687,0.005229293,0.0061205034,0.004219511,0.0073810737,0.0054028244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010890797,0.00006548105,0.002149669,0.00010725826,0.000010913321,0.00048321052,0.008443346,0.00014052066,0.0012075466,0.70582336,0.26352546,0.017934343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066398956,0.00008870515,0.007138561,0.00073222874,0.000046912606,0.0004303853,0.0045414246,0.00026887684,0.0016826596,0.07200722,0.91287535,0.00012119771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06405808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10536156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06405808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037020417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013969662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12737042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376140502","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12651","title":"Face-work in Chinese routine criminal trials","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Politics; Law; Punitive damages; Performative utterance; Political science; Situational ethics; Face-to-face; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10181221454092058,"score_gpt":0.4170913701284895,"score_spread":0.3152791555875689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376140502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905089,0.0004972245,0.0002306943,0.00026251288,0.000016521268,0.000033610264,0.000029878514,0.0000032141886,0.008417437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99813855,0.0002614797,0.00012415649,0.00006554591,0.00000939643,0.000022304976,0.000027216787,0.0000017848175,0.0013495812],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979279,0.0009688675,0.00008760676,0.00017659659,0.00055247074,0.00028658847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970341,0.0009789527,0.000958302,0.00015743003,0.0003842158,0.00048690054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001960366,0.0002457408,0.00038537398,0.0016056462,0.0035892122,0.0014068828,0.0006281461,0.00057622965,0.005909326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006624904,0.00012698515,0.00019459908,0.0015702306,0.0022434092,0.0011215268,0.0015827179,0.00057125854,0.00025114082],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050469255,0.0007060433,0.43935773,0.0010174667,0.00013576084,0.005606981,0.22255325,0.0009511803,0.0046542482,0.010649733,0.007340846,0.3065221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022867336,0.00021108582,0.8911043,0.0001735828,0.00004258875,0.0008102696,0.08952575,0.0014202852,0.0007544323,0.0018524558,0.0140246665,0.000057740737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032102846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057136007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032102846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023484319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016309827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063831985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376870915","doi":"10.1080/07352166.2023.2195779","title":"<i>Rights and the city: Problems, progress, and practice</i> , by Sandeep Agrawal (ed.) <b> <i>Rights and the city: Problems, progress, and practice</i> </b> , by Sandeep Agrawal (ed.), Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, University of Alberta Press, 2022","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Urban Affairs","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.006741780759335036,"score_gpt":0.22436400752983704,"score_spread":0.217622226770502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376870915","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020937661,0.6507819,0.0008511922,0.14663145,0.004859916,0.000031111573,0.00027243074,0.00006517047,0.19441304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08843381,0.594421,0.0020879812,0.016492642,0.003136198,0.00006373995,0.00045237917,0.00012970735,0.2947825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987318,0.00034282438,0.000041376836,0.00010946057,0.000541249,0.00023330215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941707,0.00015796574,0.000042375967,0.000031022257,0.00021028331,0.00014131155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001164291,0.00091812667,0.0004991952,0.0015099361,0.0063655577,0.012881385,0.0011217907,0.002373797,0.011142869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019325855,0.0005275327,0.00038684113,0.0050425353,0.013755219,0.007052223,0.002559109,0.003264469,0.0033554477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011659935,0.000012697614,0.00060198485,0.00031218294,0.0000075548805,0.00008320834,0.008863718,0.00017842371,0.00007459928,0.121451795,0.8165454,0.051856782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026082932,0.0000027624203,0.001333347,0.0005482432,0.0000042439865,0.000050210165,0.009651846,0.000038266648,0.000034583267,0.016004317,0.9723208,0.0000089173045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6397901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79835135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36020988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026354115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03941952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7246624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376880637","doi":"10.7202/1098271ar","title":"Noël Carroll, \"Arthur Danto’s Philosophy of Art: Essays\"","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art history; Contemporary philosophy; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06551497441048966,"score_gpt":0.3452131222253301,"score_spread":0.2796981478148405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376880637","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013988106,0.60715204,0.0004635501,0.35069877,0.033972364,0.000026145222,0.00007760379,0.000019566525,0.0074501415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010850882,0.38814273,0.001187712,0.50903153,0.056154054,0.00028352722,0.00010036829,0.0001165827,0.034132577],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98874843,0.0050527058,0.00071993633,0.0010470992,0.004033716,0.00039810833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658977,0.025330383,0.0010688927,0.0006688111,0.0061476156,0.00088653027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011266126,0.0012841448,0.0013802495,0.006431996,0.0057581877,0.00960516,0.0030119452,0.017486112,0.0059876083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06748059,0.0008270926,0.0007876025,0.005873304,0.011275654,0.015636044,0.0043621315,0.010532246,0.00236129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017334294,0.000009832686,0.000074958996,0.000651488,0.000018586345,0.00003667494,0.0009392072,0.00003160782,0.00004610002,0.033358,0.9521961,0.012620094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017143622,0.000005595838,0.00027853838,0.0019117947,0.000015102842,0.000042532363,0.00069489144,0.000024997285,0.000081758015,0.024376223,0.97252613,0.00002524958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046924617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07012021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046924617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074298466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012033427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093302965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377232538","doi":"10.1111/lasr.12657","title":"<i>Doodem and council fire: Anishinaabe governance through alliance</i> . By Heidi Bohaker. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2020. 304 pp. $37.95 paperback","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Media studies; Corporate governance; Political science; Sociology; Economic history; History; Law; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.027709397131135113,"score_gpt":0.2653618502451521,"score_spread":0.23765245311401695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377232538","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000121398676,0.92290026,0.00009062484,0.054100107,0.005390269,0.000008480787,0.00009465663,0.000017656002,0.017276535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010760534,0.84844285,0.00025926024,0.015805878,0.004114411,0.00004693596,0.0002609557,0.000053304026,0.12025584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921465,0.00026867227,0.000044000102,0.000064594904,0.0002897539,0.00011831704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905545,0.0003029216,0.00015714722,0.000036617934,0.00024332173,0.00020464884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012824263,0.0008875389,0.00048098652,0.001470915,0.0017982321,0.0037151708,0.00083270884,0.0024148617,0.021626823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002752144,0.0005785834,0.00025839612,0.0033325045,0.0018440788,0.0048995926,0.0017552453,0.0027616064,0.008265678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068165355,0.0000030814003,0.00006605833,0.00036534754,0.0000035972726,0.000017272294,0.00028350667,0.000018365914,0.000024655705,0.00550246,0.9699425,0.023766411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029895334,0.0000046657774,0.0006379068,0.0011318101,0.0000045155807,0.000033720895,0.0005525271,0.000013624317,0.00002398311,0.0019870016,0.99560285,0.000004429686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06947056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19068366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9305294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055680317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006725945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1381324},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4377250526","doi":"10.1515/9780228012252-007","title":"It Was a Man’s World: Blaine Baker and the Writing of Canadian Legal History, 1981–2018","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal history; History; World history; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01926958376448174,"score_gpt":0.2069880998568473,"score_spread":0.18771851609236556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377250526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018096287,0.26480353,0.00049006316,0.35613695,0.010383011,0.00007250338,0.0006782105,0.000058816917,0.3492807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34506738,0.06927569,0.0008098906,0.03672195,0.0024237242,0.00008645039,0.00030450785,0.00025752548,0.5450529],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966388,0.0006316581,0.00009728888,0.00034085798,0.0012069568,0.0010843814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962465,0.0011853321,0.00016513879,0.00009034881,0.0016630618,0.0006495215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003529944,0.0010255182,0.000619974,0.005119188,0.0462262,0.014579948,0.0024765923,0.0062898365,0.015291003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009359612,0.00072357245,0.00030990946,0.008651892,0.028982636,0.006602536,0.003916345,0.0071063032,0.0013375214],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003565171,0.00001529148,0.00053584983,0.00020900248,0.000009071003,0.00030873207,0.13096832,0.00012595624,0.0000978754,0.2581207,0.5823956,0.027177988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003135057,0.0000021625137,0.001144057,0.00038482287,0.0000053527324,0.00004855674,0.032870166,0.000021266565,0.0000566348,0.0043949494,0.96104324,0.00002578883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9892596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99657106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18647477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18647477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21374768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94357395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377250531","doi":"10.1515/9780228012252-008","title":"Traces of Blaine Baker upon McGill’s Faculty of Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.027690990030994185,"score_gpt":0.24593720823957035,"score_spread":0.21824621820857618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377250531","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048145615,0.024890834,0.0011243186,0.35874093,0.0062628537,0.000045108154,0.00014111155,0.000109445115,0.60387075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0720392,0.0028730955,0.00063644216,0.0703153,0.0012426197,0.00006134837,0.000018653967,0.00022533072,0.85258806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971564,0.00087456126,0.00004772095,0.0003532944,0.00080115994,0.00076694036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954254,0.0019342442,0.00015079504,0.0002791968,0.0009159313,0.0012943986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029261503,0.00056504674,0.00061908,0.0021263084,0.021240234,0.0125890495,0.002147651,0.010321375,0.039653145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008513283,0.0007698327,0.00038391602,0.0020206904,0.021452205,0.008370276,0.0044411127,0.013671527,0.0047390405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009118864,0.000017109582,0.00006450663,0.000018756911,0.0000015853403,0.000070584734,0.0051412475,0.000028912526,0.000050151026,0.52549666,0.4632417,0.0058597303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050475396,0.000004988987,0.00015354584,0.00009050863,0.0000017601498,0.000025963003,0.0025347667,0.000031935102,0.000077494726,0.026531603,0.9705254,0.00001694898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36748016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6595216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97081006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029189963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023589648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7306824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377983723","doi":"10.55496/rkbc6573","title":"On Women, Equality and the Constitution: Through the Looking Glass of Feminism","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"National Law School Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; International Development Research Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Constitution; Feminism; Gender equality; Relevance (law); Law; Political science; Inequality; Sociology; Protectionism; Gender studies; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02752778594387688,"score_gpt":0.3257069810723394,"score_spread":0.2981791951284625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377983723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04626224,0.07009629,0.009772632,0.21323504,0.0015082641,0.000023093575,0.000068022564,0.00003182027,0.65900266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9220228,0.017662795,0.0017945381,0.016724095,0.0013474325,0.00004081684,0.000022220065,0.000062274055,0.04032289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967444,0.002274039,0.00003867424,0.00023474667,0.00034147035,0.00036664095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777395,0.0018079819,0.000108569984,0.00010739787,0.0001078968,0.00009416312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039467243,0.0003460637,0.00035696573,0.0012231196,0.006469816,0.009225378,0.00065859105,0.0024764591,0.0043575657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037931977,0.0001778957,0.00027302187,0.0009007637,0.06591952,0.009211898,0.004323183,0.0047822683,0.00034998805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045262277,0.0000033328,0.000095566036,0.000015332458,0.0000012722569,0.000028447352,0.008223304,0.000043804506,0.000039390925,0.98687136,0.0014366857,0.0032370575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066384214,0.000018111063,0.0005917331,0.0002849827,0.0000052044484,0.000061464634,0.018000774,0.00010387913,0.00023222675,0.69501406,0.28566614,0.000014718728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010919984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018088026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010919984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059124366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003166158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04289794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378388083","doi":"10.1515/9781399505109","title":"Law, Surveillance and the Humanities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Digital humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.030635018357450104,"score_gpt":0.22862201224757772,"score_spread":0.1979869938901276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378388083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012552157,0.09685877,0.0034598438,0.17996821,0.00156701,0.000036840276,0.000050723786,0.00007045215,0.70543605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81406474,0.066784956,0.003140337,0.02490955,0.0030022215,0.00019705296,0.00008340374,0.00012891008,0.08768888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99055696,0.0068011284,0.0002664112,0.0006266126,0.0010116115,0.00073722476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851666,0.01182586,0.00085063116,0.0010843577,0.0004990112,0.0005735584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065144766,0.00043888655,0.00060946436,0.002810415,0.016108617,0.022807356,0.0015458873,0.00648763,0.0070964354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010794853,0.00041147767,0.00035460806,0.0038016941,0.1028307,0.018768141,0.006727111,0.006205287,0.001107959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002594928,0.0000066614193,0.00012403031,0.000050988754,0.0000019060949,0.000070970826,0.018712915,0.00005700518,0.00002241494,0.96307844,0.010924941,0.0069471733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063281323,0.000014962706,0.00050115684,0.0010083499,0.0000028044412,0.00017854136,0.037008625,0.00012398363,0.00006488368,0.37766528,0.583408,0.000017092183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014170707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012151999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022807356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009412625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074034235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06829375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378418998","doi":"10.1080/13569783.2023.2170222","title":"Atarraya: listening to human and non-human voices in post-conflict Colombia","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Drama Education The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Performative utterance; Active listening; Citizen journalism; Futures contract; Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Transitional justice; Face (sociological concept); Human rights; Gender studies; Aesthetics; Political science; Social science; Visual arts; Law; Art; Business; Communication","score_opus":0.0423716731269088,"score_gpt":0.40715990945248043,"score_spread":0.3647882363255716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378418998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7798747,0.006158323,0.0028708538,0.01073214,0.00088039896,0.00015629601,0.00016045355,0.00014230289,0.19902445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98943233,0.0008279556,0.0004746892,0.00048893056,0.00007186056,0.000047851652,0.000030891813,0.000041501426,0.008584096],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973943,0.0015813918,0.000039496994,0.00019525291,0.00024014388,0.0005494208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836916,0.00090496213,0.0001577995,0.00009042128,0.00014222699,0.00033543847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016869353,0.0008173426,0.00050761335,0.0013366631,0.013733581,0.008614794,0.001231526,0.002006989,0.0057483464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045470744,0.0001910624,0.00022610063,0.0009706066,0.011935547,0.0026908542,0.008091503,0.002349765,0.00038069536],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018207575,0.000058067115,0.0021567857,0.00036505712,0.000011143975,0.002462349,0.9490302,0.00017197485,0.0024435713,0.01212601,0.005489546,0.025503235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010326442,0.000047887806,0.0051615136,0.00023637182,0.0000093324825,0.00048012298,0.90524787,0.00013698572,0.000496177,0.001129627,0.08700823,0.000035519246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051560733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15067822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051560733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073756077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027284266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10252124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378419015","doi":"10.1080/13569783.2023.2177145","title":"Transforming relations through oral history performance: restorative justice and the DOHR project","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research in Drama Education The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; Dalhousie University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Restorative justice; Active listening; Curriculum; Oral history; Economic Justice; Nova scotia; Sociology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Political science; Criminology; Communication; Law","score_opus":0.08856431626744862,"score_gpt":0.39645340307831417,"score_spread":0.3078890868108656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378419015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31701866,0.0035986018,0.015806977,0.02467228,0.00075112574,0.00020274101,0.000059718855,0.00019834278,0.63769144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94426674,0.0017735645,0.004954322,0.0006885601,0.0001146702,0.00007637895,0.000024245499,0.00007435676,0.0480271],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573505,0.0029521703,0.000052146486,0.00015710964,0.0005073627,0.0005961859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704105,0.0013845235,0.0001912799,0.00045899628,0.000211171,0.0007129506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058335024,0.00037434782,0.00023561473,0.00094902137,0.0074380934,0.008307773,0.0012268499,0.0010889263,0.0080947755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005724721,0.00017104867,0.00017819261,0.00071827,0.017921776,0.0028681024,0.011298387,0.0024763567,0.00084490847],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093613635,0.00040299929,0.002199584,0.00036211958,0.000010134232,0.00076010334,0.4543122,0.0005603026,0.0022159342,0.28459257,0.016041419,0.23844896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025370602,0.00017908894,0.005394676,0.00058994466,0.000017344844,0.0006289368,0.43022707,0.0004160072,0.0028758273,0.02562744,0.53398085,0.000037448255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013804793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043414548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013804793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061583365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007903025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044682086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378444593","doi":"10.1515/9780773596375-014","title":"Our Vacant Lot is a Trailer Park: Why English Canada’s Perpetual Threat of Disappearing Keeps Film and Television Alive","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trailer; Advertising; History; Media studies; Aeronautics; Meteorology; Geography; Engineering; Sociology; Business; Automotive engineering","score_opus":0.017103646572686097,"score_gpt":0.21634776080743762,"score_spread":0.19924411423475152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378444593","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102953814,0.0065809013,0.00079714425,0.18347998,0.0011183755,0.000028990891,0.00017997345,0.000063122716,0.7047977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6324702,0.0023915165,0.00032129925,0.02012068,0.00016157037,0.00001663473,0.0000468325,0.00016726575,0.3443039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852115,0.00023217792,0.000016178861,0.00011946845,0.00034821674,0.00076280965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985495,0.00038090732,0.0000660497,0.00004700862,0.00044309325,0.0005134524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011145194,0.0002868716,0.0002484072,0.0006255821,0.027363008,0.012282232,0.0012899953,0.0044197165,0.017624266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002464173,0.00030969948,0.0002423576,0.0012094347,0.016791953,0.0050346805,0.0027606373,0.00750268,0.001279369],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003455283,0.000026545586,0.0030296156,0.000064187254,0.000008514648,0.0009329345,0.3376118,0.00008953387,0.0003525801,0.38036627,0.25491166,0.022571836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008454828,0.000007058442,0.0040487214,0.00018163279,0.000013300666,0.0001904296,0.24979253,0.00012329686,0.00015229633,0.008018364,0.73743325,0.00003065875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9710325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99066657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04954791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04954791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057055518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35949695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378981959","doi":"10.1017/s000893892300016x","title":"The Eichmann Trial Reconsidered Edited by Rebecca Wittmann. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 2021. Pp. 272. Hardback $75.00. ISBN: 978-1487508494.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Central European History","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Media studies; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01991018022749188,"score_gpt":0.22076568840337144,"score_spread":0.20085550817587955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378981959","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004448626,0.8572238,0.0003237554,0.07977916,0.007389423,0.000014548909,0.00046788878,0.000036404876,0.054320168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02973161,0.66104823,0.0009663332,0.01903682,0.005881702,0.00010310984,0.0005992451,0.00021046367,0.2824226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998596,0.00049685687,0.000076687174,0.00013495199,0.00048339553,0.00021208588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883944,0.00045632455,0.00015364814,0.00007672138,0.00028015062,0.00019372423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023342974,0.0011388373,0.0009964757,0.0019564992,0.002214171,0.004020853,0.0017242834,0.0036469295,0.030228807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048795096,0.0009982655,0.00044325017,0.0032730354,0.005465227,0.0038090749,0.0012538102,0.003871586,0.0069690538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002955307,0.000005762044,0.00006933553,0.00018509534,0.0000068094296,0.00007137994,0.00043781346,0.000108250024,0.00003015705,0.03381562,0.9319953,0.033244863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012991239,0.000004648011,0.00083840836,0.0007481723,0.0000067686356,0.0000881203,0.00034026598,0.00004307294,0.00004136872,0.017424516,0.9804401,0.000011722377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2466157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43348297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2466157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017894436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022909239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4903605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379617658","doi":"10.1353/mlr.2004.a826911","title":"Of Philosophers and Kings: Political Philosophy in Shakespeare's 'Macbeth' and 'King Lear' by Leon Harold Craig (review)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Modern Language Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Literature; Power (physics); Scrutiny; Unrest; History; Humanism; Reading (process); Philosophy; Classics; Art; Theology; Law","score_opus":0.022956055400186096,"score_gpt":0.3189832822186045,"score_spread":0.2960272268184184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379617658","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002870556,0.9962478,0.0000053343983,0.003177687,0.00023487779,4.228092e-7,0.0000024213562,3.744007e-7,0.00030225446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010113661,0.9954743,0.000015646321,0.0021343366,0.00093383796,0.000004378979,0.000011055834,0.0000014833893,0.00041355446],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863607,0.00063903094,0.00012789057,0.00012325369,0.0003359607,0.00013785157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99561924,0.0030899162,0.00039842958,0.00007639443,0.00046618466,0.00034974207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032025685,0.00082304096,0.0018481207,0.0038164188,0.0012991565,0.003914863,0.0011680751,0.003881461,0.0057366043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055860667,0.00067794713,0.000521648,0.006648619,0.005315035,0.0060371407,0.002437892,0.005803567,0.0018703155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013020585,0.00007508748,0.0008914395,0.02117042,0.00021180368,0.00019139414,0.0037212237,0.00013922859,0.00008970818,0.024077533,0.41382143,0.53548056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039136474,0.000050356764,0.0041321437,0.036856145,0.00007780174,0.0004201168,0.0023073945,0.00003891859,0.000028371802,0.0044248877,0.95160127,0.000023459266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0228043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042872485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0228043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004130479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007442879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0453431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379624119","doi":"10.1353/mlr.2003.a827278","title":"Of Philosophers and Kings: Political Philosophy in Shakespeare's 'Macbeth' and 'King Lear' by Leon Harold Craig (review)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Modern Language Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Literature; Power (physics); Scrutiny; History; Unrest; Reading (process); Philosophy; Classics; Art; Law; Theology","score_opus":0.024789794642424524,"score_gpt":0.3183246827611528,"score_spread":0.29353488811872824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379624119","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002870556,0.9962478,0.0000053343983,0.003177687,0.00023487779,4.228092e-7,0.0000024213562,3.744007e-7,0.00030225446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010113661,0.9954743,0.000015646321,0.0021343366,0.00093383796,0.000004378979,0.000011055834,0.0000014833893,0.00041355446],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863607,0.00063903094,0.00012789057,0.00012325369,0.0003359607,0.00013785157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99561924,0.0030899162,0.00039842958,0.00007639443,0.00046618466,0.00034974207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032025685,0.00082304096,0.0018481207,0.0038164188,0.0012991565,0.003914863,0.0011680751,0.003881461,0.0057366043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055860667,0.00067794713,0.000521648,0.006648619,0.005315035,0.0060371407,0.002437892,0.005803567,0.0018703155],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013020585,0.00007508748,0.0008914395,0.02117042,0.00021180368,0.00019139414,0.0037212237,0.00013922859,0.00008970818,0.024077533,0.41382143,0.53548056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039136474,0.000050356764,0.0041321437,0.036856145,0.00007780174,0.0004201168,0.0023073945,0.00003891859,0.000028371802,0.0044248877,0.95160127,0.000023459266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0228043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042872485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0228043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004130479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007442879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0453431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379660872","doi":"10.15664/stalj.v2i1.2465","title":"Understanding the Relationship between Canadian Law and Settler-Colonial Land Ontologies for Contemporary Decolonisation Movements","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"St Andrews Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Sovereignty; Principle of legality; Colonialism; Legitimation; Indigenous; Law; Political science; Power (physics); Self-determination; Politics; Ecology","score_opus":0.19459577096008887,"score_gpt":0.33838114686452175,"score_spread":0.14378537590443288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379660872","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46941522,0.0053142575,0.0053504724,0.04778561,0.00012490398,0.00007769493,0.00023190049,0.00004809415,0.47165194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920752,0.0011914333,0.00084316963,0.00059994875,0.000013431013,0.000013527953,0.00003827439,0.000013123538,0.0052117817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971136,0.0004911949,0.0000737322,0.00028735973,0.00080343394,0.0012307041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99304515,0.002989235,0.0007271528,0.00026283538,0.0021868648,0.0007886638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044971653,0.0003492336,0.0003391409,0.0055762273,0.02104348,0.0156146055,0.0018218922,0.001992721,0.006777897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013209751,0.00041509967,0.0002822848,0.0065723923,0.048798412,0.009073468,0.005122759,0.003614452,0.00016932096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014424108,0.000014050524,0.008675405,0.00005917477,0.0000073962715,0.0003457424,0.16802882,0.0003908624,0.00031027372,0.80148125,0.0033463864,0.01732622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016988484,0.000018818353,0.057256952,0.0006328138,0.000048574682,0.0002871816,0.51273257,0.002302209,0.00049013284,0.17706873,0.24899529,0.00014971862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9874091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99487585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16607675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16607675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15848505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96723276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379742188","doi":"10.1353/flm.2020.0020","title":"Nuremberg: A Definitive Survey of the Evidentiary Films","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Film & history","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Prison; Nazism; War crime; Nuremberg trials; German; The Holocaust; Political science; Archivist; Sociology; History; International law; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0725512038999757,"score_gpt":0.27083272861691293,"score_spread":0.19828152471693722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379742188","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05221266,0.5408423,0.0025895159,0.020573607,0.003105252,0.00040776876,0.005687818,0.0001860762,0.37439492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24661645,0.59496164,0.010254232,0.004781713,0.0026320813,0.0003410003,0.0077711586,0.0006783263,0.13196342],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958093,0.0013375448,0.00042274548,0.00035028387,0.0018156776,0.00026442631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98914135,0.0050635715,0.0013438856,0.0008150071,0.0031788538,0.00045728087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003739232,0.0007796316,0.00044604272,0.01441838,0.002324718,0.007641964,0.0008833509,0.001452898,0.0153330555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021577993,0.00069938146,0.0002112306,0.018538859,0.0026389256,0.005787406,0.0019773685,0.002095082,0.00426746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078845624,0.00004910889,0.004147642,0.0028077196,0.00002332035,0.0004057323,0.014753965,0.00023932579,0.00220236,0.052015554,0.2869546,0.63632184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001129151,0.000014375341,0.009164985,0.0014548202,0.000004939724,0.0001949025,0.002040431,0.000027909962,0.00033706595,0.00096608873,0.9857814,0.000012075318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021976544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053790458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021976544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00446705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003575264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051294208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379779895","doi":"10.1353/aiq.2015.a595117","title":"Anthropological Experts and the Legal System: Brazil and Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Indian Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Blame; Miller; Law; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Legal realism; Legal process; Political science; Legal profession; Social science; Psychology","score_opus":0.00990211057077985,"score_gpt":0.27115871805264846,"score_spread":0.26125660748186863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379779895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45189035,0.024054024,0.0009962205,0.21356747,0.00048395793,0.00022131985,0.0005073757,0.000054139295,0.30822504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94632006,0.00887814,0.0010067861,0.011101401,0.000062297535,0.000052231346,0.00011698426,0.000031191736,0.032430876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566084,0.0006063051,0.00010882364,0.00030308837,0.0011681325,0.0021526879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99363303,0.001570654,0.00042453888,0.00013692361,0.0019105152,0.0023243572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003307623,0.00031625113,0.00038559298,0.0024637966,0.027598698,0.0072514242,0.0021401371,0.003330571,0.007878562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0095426375,0.00037705642,0.000254959,0.004065488,0.0110355625,0.0023281358,0.005801855,0.003686998,0.00020690524],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000731191,0.00013543753,0.029513039,0.0004769402,0.000039379396,0.0034896135,0.231138,0.00081150525,0.00096618757,0.5945835,0.06061605,0.07815719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048481223,0.000035323457,0.08669299,0.0014683724,0.0000793535,0.0006539475,0.23169376,0.001192571,0.00057407824,0.023477422,0.6538663,0.00021745649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99435025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99765056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.122265175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.122265175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20725255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8871001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379803936","doi":"10.1353/nai.2022.a863595","title":"Law's Indigenous Ethics by John Borrows (review)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Native American and Indigenous Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Decolonization; Rhetoric; Doctrine; Political science; Law; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Politics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04062820689516269,"score_gpt":0.3707772443305541,"score_spread":0.3301490374353914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379803936","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000040141138,0.97728515,0.000037624046,0.015410801,0.00452723,0.000011919298,0.0000344844,0.000008873658,0.0026438509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010214349,0.9653661,0.00012667103,0.017784514,0.0042104293,0.00004303735,0.00009092797,0.000017542185,0.011339293],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975539,0.0005610055,0.00022774751,0.00022048019,0.0012687136,0.0001681983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944313,0.00204515,0.0005533178,0.00013193332,0.0022070743,0.0006311715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024809465,0.001199625,0.0016875442,0.003974908,0.001105624,0.004152985,0.0015618942,0.0029791244,0.015586546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011507943,0.0006628686,0.00082026265,0.006130313,0.00275533,0.004240226,0.0024910362,0.005090097,0.0064980728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013173572,0.000009275823,0.00008660497,0.006058841,0.00003189931,0.000040751973,0.00016499386,0.000047838475,0.00004382234,0.0019822572,0.89798504,0.09353564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011349658,0.000010567629,0.00074901246,0.018002952,0.00003968298,0.00021932344,0.00022858747,0.000017292501,0.000023709803,0.00094433804,0.9797376,0.000015651196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025048636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03622316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025048636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004512043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016211288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052142203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380232008","doi":"10.1515/9780773574946-011","title":"Observation Template: Bar Ethnography, Halifax","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bar (unit); Ethnography; Sociology; Geology; Anthropology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.03977716284144279,"score_gpt":0.2415326214997945,"score_spread":0.2017554586583517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380232008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020408075,0.0011911727,0.11435211,0.0029501214,0.0007962241,0.0032024703,0.32876787,0.009638392,0.5186936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09090952,0.0018958964,0.19331306,0.00074683665,0.00018361636,0.014082343,0.12525937,0.0064769597,0.5671325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994168,0.00019531645,0.00005962908,0.00013040332,0.0001411192,0.000056887126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733114,0.0013535084,0.00010509951,0.00041485135,0.00069707335,0.0000983839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015669082,0.00048075043,0.00025936193,0.003483431,0.0016681023,0.0017089522,0.00089721195,0.00055811304,0.13669911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038146519,0.0005668814,0.00021594779,0.0056344233,0.0005806908,0.0016283914,0.0011132716,0.0006678814,0.027025573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012708314,0.000056609628,0.0023505138,0.00089802605,0.000007359474,0.0002527068,0.019890808,0.00034329417,0.0037499364,0.008006214,0.70427454,0.26004294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020399128,0.000014557288,0.0087657245,0.00031381298,0.000007642031,0.00012429897,0.007979662,0.00035517267,0.0015031983,0.0012505644,0.97964877,0.000016082071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09183909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18846054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9081609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023817238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040383404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45730406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380267761","doi":"10.1515/9780773583887-003","title":"Introduction: Brutal Passions and Beyond Locating Women’s Experiences in the Montreal Judicial Archives","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Media studies; History; Political science; Art history; Law; Art; Sociology; Literature","score_opus":0.017257781448816917,"score_gpt":0.2280267997979391,"score_spread":0.21076901834912218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380267761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032327786,0.0410966,0.0010817499,0.08278924,0.0028579847,0.00014466375,0.0016701993,0.00017502328,0.83785677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3501368,0.022384131,0.00094178197,0.009128551,0.0017175274,0.00014253957,0.0004737985,0.0002994176,0.61477536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911755,0.00027810593,0.000015365273,0.0000772248,0.00021219198,0.0002994602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988404,0.00055215275,0.00007179434,0.000037312402,0.0002204683,0.00027783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097224244,0.0006414745,0.00030856332,0.002394937,0.015643312,0.00974574,0.0018540139,0.0023963673,0.05445328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031015053,0.0003633025,0.0002671599,0.0053650844,0.010567373,0.0033242584,0.0025509926,0.0032657832,0.00186211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026612928,0.000027611539,0.0017515965,0.00028624287,0.0000059357462,0.00045299745,0.21949802,0.00019089426,0.00034338626,0.26861247,0.47067916,0.038124982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022185009,0.000006146133,0.00610462,0.00038771585,0.000003478624,0.00008051323,0.07883645,0.000032172,0.00009380572,0.0025424713,0.91188836,0.000022172813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90072733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9699005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09927267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047230784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028834937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34268492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380550320","doi":"10.1177/08883254231173145","title":"Contending Temporalities: Stretching the Temporal Reach of Lustration in Central and Eastern Europe","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"East European Politics and Societies and Cultures","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transitional justice; Communism; Political science; Vetting; Law; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.031651536937487026,"score_gpt":0.28509845097816566,"score_spread":0.25344691404067865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380550320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92746836,0.0023522978,0.0023673014,0.004031584,0.000099794364,0.00003147929,0.00011234145,0.000019774036,0.06351718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973665,0.00045446705,0.00024974984,0.00038678583,0.000017333181,0.000017645978,0.000027747361,0.000009633136,0.0014701161],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978173,0.0008367234,0.00021693984,0.00028570346,0.0002715055,0.00057174783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99602604,0.0017927962,0.0011370119,0.00036639298,0.00039092466,0.00028693385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049613197,0.00014863255,0.00016567126,0.002238754,0.006725107,0.005807709,0.0008339945,0.0009841664,0.0023581928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074017947,0.00027075963,0.0002338779,0.0029112732,0.012032499,0.0058573033,0.0076883603,0.0018312914,0.00010249964],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001271757,0.00003161689,0.08684695,0.00017516721,0.00004103691,0.0032069187,0.57399946,0.00080617424,0.0009361386,0.2819976,0.0045995773,0.047232207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010423689,0.000035329263,0.14009064,0.0011159852,0.000036448404,0.0010228016,0.68002,0.00043899415,0.0011937907,0.022027316,0.15394491,0.00006328878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044473905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1131951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044473905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052612415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032675795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08843011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380925705","doi":"10.3138/ctr.118.012","title":"1. from <i>Blacks Don’t Bowl</i>","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Theatre Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Moral rights; Copyright law; Law; Civil rights; Political science; History; Sociology; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.015092162073153772,"score_gpt":0.2720730427004523,"score_spread":0.2569808806272985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380925705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001757387,0.011776517,0.0018674232,0.26996064,0.023566272,0.00014391667,0.00058290147,0.0006437607,0.68970114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014442359,0.004334739,0.0009118346,0.061956845,0.0017623724,0.00010246016,0.00018689953,0.00047573703,0.9158267],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880743,0.00028031055,0.000051779993,0.00014264732,0.000541479,0.00017626911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986823,0.00028506404,0.00008724353,0.00013175265,0.0006658227,0.0001477107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014418729,0.00071382534,0.00033812074,0.0006605778,0.0066316198,0.0043086223,0.0011355322,0.0036452268,0.13346966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006526651,0.00036343726,0.0003816858,0.00050562376,0.0024907223,0.00519754,0.00257828,0.007312757,0.08205076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007304084,0.0000022265217,0.00005605208,0.000052664087,8.1393597e-7,0.000028256129,0.0012034421,0.0000045580427,0.0000894176,0.011837195,0.9772815,0.009436666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011282355,0.0000037100258,0.00013475516,0.000116787916,9.761691e-7,0.00004890698,0.0011778413,0.0000071347154,0.00006332541,0.0007456133,0.99769586,0.000004037959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.098844625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14749296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13346966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024539358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029323923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44650048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381187352","doi":"10.46692/9781529222036.066","title":"Restorative Justice and Therapeutic Jurisprudence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Economic Justice; Restorative justice; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.02713366024672155,"score_gpt":0.33417087008929236,"score_spread":0.3070372098425708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381187352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013997253,0.06987594,0.052578095,0.19602984,0.0042666397,0.0003894986,0.000084273066,0.00021986596,0.6625586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82450604,0.02627352,0.033251166,0.06394313,0.004665862,0.0012595525,0.0001122401,0.00030776407,0.04568065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9594147,0.022880383,0.0019338601,0.00571367,0.0070718373,0.0029855706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841172,0.010084895,0.0012469012,0.0018835387,0.0014397696,0.0012275862],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02358014,0.0009541101,0.0015631373,0.0036025692,0.014646137,0.017019834,0.0033304018,0.014074211,0.0046629356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018002093,0.0006419934,0.0010620008,0.002591994,0.18431547,0.011422506,0.017074263,0.01866741,0.0010488674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039279685,0.000021793649,0.000046552566,0.00006584144,0.0000036429283,0.00008626348,0.01001847,0.000071193,0.00004937418,0.98276997,0.0018419854,0.0050210743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016021077,0.000028765944,0.0002201935,0.0004087547,0.0000052991254,0.000286282,0.004957923,0.00018578827,0.00012670626,0.80841225,0.18532714,0.000024867113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060188444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004061927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02358014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015067998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0137772905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124705136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382881117","doi":"10.37497/sdgs.v1i2.193","title":"Semiótica Jurídica: Análise dos Aspectos Etiológicos da Criminalidade","year":2013,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Sustainable Development","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WSP (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Literal (mathematical logic); Linguistics","score_opus":0.021662483476915944,"score_gpt":0.27715608291979776,"score_spread":0.2554935994428818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382881117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5537845,0.0037973595,0.03503277,0.00839829,0.00032914797,0.00042884797,0.00045751044,0.000106914566,0.39766464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892553,0.0010700795,0.0038171606,0.00014696667,0.000051274765,0.00012472236,0.00011805118,0.00003352751,0.0053830133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99136037,0.0045404253,0.0006280183,0.0005413244,0.0024054972,0.00052427046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851783,0.007827109,0.0026680029,0.0010455704,0.002602272,0.00067864545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069327955,0.0005255981,0.00054491346,0.0082031805,0.00723636,0.0108963745,0.0010820816,0.001259969,0.0069555766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027020363,0.00032022837,0.0003930353,0.007884227,0.018926207,0.0059605152,0.008594894,0.0025721814,0.00058977434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055734887,0.00003853683,0.026393753,0.00041021282,0.000023220553,0.00072115334,0.37233037,0.00023070998,0.0006209442,0.56684446,0.0020570438,0.030273873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009961778,0.00006074232,0.040119167,0.0009982948,0.000056138688,0.0019206903,0.64163667,0.0010166581,0.0009805796,0.15762372,0.15548237,0.0000949566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008455223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010598098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0108963745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004092788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008484813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036664546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383227113","doi":"10.1007/s10982-023-09479-9","title":"Legal Positivism and Naturalistic Explanation of Action","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Philosophy","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Naturalism; Legal positivism; Positivism; Epistemology; Adjudication; Legal formalism; Philosophy of law; Legal realism; Sociology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Legal research; Comparative law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.03720735428246892,"score_gpt":0.31352434373090743,"score_spread":0.2763169894484385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383227113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037374496,0.005816341,0.2551366,0.14991796,0.0012792979,0.00014331097,0.0005432848,0.00032531394,0.5494634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542237,0.0013846932,0.02023161,0.0038183266,0.00085429533,0.00028592476,0.00016336108,0.000110157416,0.018927965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575317,0.002431759,0.00018671613,0.0005464022,0.0007073067,0.00037463332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99095017,0.0064111557,0.00055160513,0.0010466062,0.00075010356,0.00029043647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006183345,0.00077153323,0.0013186013,0.0030325225,0.00384927,0.0075052334,0.0032657213,0.006947815,0.011423244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00930682,0.00087844994,0.0015657747,0.0016698098,0.050837275,0.014198652,0.0033446501,0.0063662664,0.0008974817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015586332,0.0000044410053,0.000021565882,0.0000089270825,0.0000021135743,0.0000064978617,0.00022556804,0.00017162637,0.0000056098197,0.9989812,0.00032496548,0.00024584812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042565694,9.2056086e-7,0.000014671664,0.00000497133,0.0000012177402,0.0000067752985,0.00006022723,0.0003164041,0.000009706898,0.9982205,0.0013586546,0.0000016267076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009621813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056955745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011423244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0079733925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046823313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057851255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383334866","doi":"10.7202/1101120ar","title":"Bjarne Melkevik, L’intelligence du droit : épistémologie juridique, Paris, Éditions Buenos Books International, 2021, 180 p., ISBN 978-2-36671-068-8.","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015944197334881952,"score_gpt":0.2717282994892586,"score_spread":0.25578410215437664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383334866","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003622651,0.8959042,0.0013720684,0.017954089,0.003298562,0.000020218517,0.00068947667,0.00012286803,0.08027632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017771702,0.7587543,0.003983609,0.00391153,0.0021807016,0.00011972311,0.0012425756,0.000502328,0.21153343],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980388,0.00048467732,0.00017500226,0.0002719945,0.00085732114,0.00017220911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984445,0.000878079,0.00019082076,0.00005961778,0.0003224555,0.000104574014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001506944,0.0021546246,0.0012004251,0.0046760845,0.0026307255,0.007831502,0.0016839483,0.00419079,0.053339414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033106317,0.0011707552,0.00062094704,0.006583769,0.0038831057,0.011951611,0.0021043168,0.0051362887,0.03499107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000890832,0.000028398073,0.00023416373,0.0017356059,0.000027036916,0.00015973559,0.0030450856,0.00019839227,0.00020063897,0.080535255,0.7991486,0.11459795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052381683,0.000004382275,0.00047819584,0.0010130558,0.0000058463247,0.0001330918,0.0006677649,0.000026054422,0.000098798526,0.010101009,0.9874505,0.00001613043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034342144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04820911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053339414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061564073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062951706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17843813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383822577","doi":"10.1177/09646639231187093","title":"Documenting the Document: The Forensic Hospital Report and Its Knowledge Moves","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Dalhousie University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Disposition; Skepticism; Knowledge production; Forensic accounting; Production (economics); Psychology; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Computer science; Accounting","score_opus":0.03229321907625092,"score_gpt":0.3612828574510367,"score_spread":0.3289896383747858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383822577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42604285,0.0046474114,0.028944446,0.13216315,0.00087921164,0.0013307605,0.0011193699,0.00018837082,0.40468445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9608397,0.0012541233,0.012438244,0.002297097,0.00011465129,0.00016931487,0.00020602347,0.00005921751,0.022621583],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9683129,0.015150846,0.0014989821,0.0018952107,0.009898983,0.0032430114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9169022,0.055905387,0.007829316,0.006793963,0.009684452,0.0028846404],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02901164,0.0003776134,0.00032931715,0.004522226,0.027252628,0.022505024,0.0045577576,0.0053539,0.0044466695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.098723024,0.00072089984,0.00032168088,0.0062206173,0.028586552,0.007144947,0.007890182,0.0048140795,0.00082397007],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004842945,0.00005036351,0.0072921757,0.00020098714,0.0000108466575,0.0052677877,0.46876544,0.000746588,0.0011066974,0.44100958,0.018103661,0.05739755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027146873,0.000038638682,0.01133228,0.0010165351,0.000035679197,0.0019469187,0.38743174,0.0013080458,0.0022874507,0.03516296,0.559239,0.00017360294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64047897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6565115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057841122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08137824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7232766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383879178","doi":"10.4324/9781003335351","title":"Decolonising Restorative Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Political science; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.056635902490650904,"score_gpt":0.36026359400241004,"score_spread":0.3036276915117591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383879178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029446539,0.03243192,0.0084860455,0.058343366,0.0040566227,0.00019272117,0.000032318196,0.00012214057,0.8668882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49525988,0.028805017,0.005518645,0.021061543,0.0018225481,0.00022038819,0.00006357145,0.00011793403,0.44713044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828726,0.0004844629,0.000050487677,0.00015691278,0.00063446426,0.00038644497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999181,0.00034023597,0.000095382326,0.00010983392,0.0001868158,0.0000868062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00139136,0.00033061698,0.00035943394,0.0008689571,0.0065848166,0.005355366,0.0013967914,0.0019655696,0.00406153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024545079,0.00017561257,0.00030755828,0.0007891155,0.014598519,0.0035060884,0.0037860887,0.0041675363,0.0005593648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014910987,0.000073987736,0.00069027545,0.00032238575,0.000005554496,0.00026131453,0.041744977,0.0005757746,0.0006606383,0.8465862,0.03647441,0.07258955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053062727,0.000033650762,0.0012224247,0.0004998497,0.000006144645,0.00019683003,0.014395368,0.00031470662,0.0005052115,0.037110798,0.94569707,0.000012736955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026327904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06766053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026327904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009100018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009366852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066025555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383909669","doi":"10.1080/20551940.2023.2232186","title":"Hearing voices: forensic speaker identification technology and expert listening in the American courtroom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Expert witness; Witness; Active listening; Eyewitness identification; Psychology; Speaker identification; Computer science; Law; Speaker recognition; Speech recognition; Political science; Communication","score_opus":0.06067094785118618,"score_gpt":0.3743820648561882,"score_spread":0.313711117005002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383909669","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35713825,0.01689447,0.06050825,0.09258526,0.0010881909,0.00018975772,0.000073372204,0.00036840347,0.47115397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9668377,0.004120003,0.00863764,0.005152925,0.00042018018,0.000057831476,0.000018399454,0.000045523277,0.01470972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98503083,0.009336237,0.0005063226,0.0012719054,0.0031834804,0.00067119114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790637,0.017113334,0.001250861,0.0006930947,0.0012390333,0.0006400088],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0154147735,0.00041607762,0.00027909808,0.0030317686,0.0068454924,0.011484735,0.0018108762,0.005712336,0.005675457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033267338,0.00042184262,0.00025138757,0.0012114196,0.029342698,0.014482045,0.005964865,0.004411858,0.0008553898],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015582147,0.00023447242,0.010744816,0.00037719213,0.000024021894,0.0029010696,0.20692763,0.0007817179,0.005592739,0.47731084,0.013851118,0.28109854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054047217,0.00061844266,0.02690599,0.0020949477,0.00008085995,0.005836301,0.3910819,0.0062534045,0.014206977,0.3794494,0.17304437,0.00037343882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006438255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010736627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9931545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003171523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003063063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08152211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384214618","doi":"10.1515/9780773597068-001","title":"Acknowledgments","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0349351791051935,"score_gpt":0.25294319622094835,"score_spread":0.21800801711575485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384214618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003242987,0.011917318,0.020545831,0.14198484,0.11417772,0.00065509824,0.026421234,0.0038941016,0.67716086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027077302,0.006138091,0.020113746,0.044645242,0.010900755,0.00077065855,0.019119786,0.00245395,0.8687805],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939606,0.0012100091,0.0003442219,0.0012416564,0.0026589653,0.0005845583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98193365,0.0017367324,0.0005681266,0.0016345202,0.011032039,0.0030949723],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052876603,0.0013617119,0.0009840154,0.0019806845,0.0035954642,0.0065021557,0.0027723864,0.0024236422,0.34348777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023381859,0.00039200103,0.0007081783,0.0016356262,0.0011393853,0.003509909,0.006029874,0.003769562,0.25363407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006371561,0.000016727847,0.0006894413,0.00024131291,0.000012200377,0.00020325219,0.00053730194,0.0000754821,0.00043031876,0.01450615,0.92642754,0.056796502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043409023,0.0000057916986,0.00021936257,0.00012945231,0.0000047009185,0.00012608446,0.0002532248,0.000028820436,0.00009352741,0.0018203607,0.99730957,0.0000047699173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005071469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009324617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65651226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035225952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008170847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.936435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384703411","doi":"10.7202/1100433ar","title":"David Dyzenhaus, \"The Long Arc of Legality\"","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Philosophy; Arc (geometry); Political science; Law; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.08613870556844938,"score_gpt":0.37675856347519987,"score_spread":0.2906198579067505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384703411","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003221349,0.44016775,0.0011528,0.5425517,0.0115043055,0.000015694213,0.00016793693,0.000037887912,0.0040796944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027152935,0.37410516,0.0029225498,0.54475445,0.034477174,0.00022195716,0.00020773974,0.00015224691,0.016005885],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.989814,0.0050339573,0.0008060728,0.0010531053,0.0029271177,0.00036590593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726963,0.022283453,0.0009041144,0.000547207,0.002989268,0.0005796458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012070548,0.0010506426,0.001219407,0.0035909791,0.0032853086,0.008615865,0.0022428157,0.0145691745,0.003864217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04698854,0.00090696965,0.0006742657,0.0053744516,0.009828236,0.018402357,0.0025798401,0.012093228,0.0017865492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004091378,0.000019625086,0.00033859359,0.000652744,0.000037561174,0.000062993364,0.0014105041,0.00009643211,0.000056918223,0.18022077,0.8031965,0.01386659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007390422,0.000013787132,0.0010730305,0.0013487479,0.000026987202,0.00008038846,0.0013495178,0.0001330941,0.0001870056,0.16909434,0.8265736,0.000045506717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025123207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042901188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025123207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005620282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007677844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06383592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384834530","doi":"10.1515/9780228018438-007","title":"Ontario: Victimhood Is in Its DNA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Canada","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"DNA; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.023380582573792892,"score_gpt":0.23162792635684412,"score_spread":0.20824734378305124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384834530","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029782993,0.009049803,0.00051326095,0.022290256,0.0009096212,0.00005084697,0.00058791816,0.00006185818,0.963558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04137417,0.005577244,0.00046003182,0.0028368577,0.00011918766,0.00003792766,0.00015634371,0.0000762185,0.9493621],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878305,0.00013678655,0.00002609997,0.000096525284,0.00054446445,0.00041311374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989993,0.00015020541,0.00004187199,0.000056521392,0.00053067144,0.00022145509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008436494,0.0005374108,0.00045875675,0.0016754741,0.022713577,0.010346588,0.0015731736,0.0036125376,0.04341358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020913042,0.00053329975,0.0003159314,0.0043808953,0.008160312,0.0024898376,0.0020959505,0.003243758,0.0044130473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009288811,0.000008548217,0.0005674775,0.00007867708,0.000003356125,0.0001289403,0.010519767,0.000098945995,0.00009208464,0.41783598,0.5446717,0.025985245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016273115,0.0000015934579,0.00066217856,0.00008146687,0.0000031983748,0.00003005912,0.003712953,0.000027815946,0.000037870588,0.006139574,0.9892942,0.0000074372383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9931717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99813783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11347827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11347827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16978076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8233464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384910734","doi":"10.57054/amr.v12i2.5112","title":"BOOK REVIEW","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Africa Media Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"National Capital Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.029971234361878474,"score_gpt":0.3135782630491695,"score_spread":0.28360702868729104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384910734","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060528645,0.59657085,0.0011623023,0.024365371,0.03560212,0.0002261762,0.0025799177,0.00035991686,0.33852807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040337443,0.40089998,0.0015133106,0.015562404,0.013086805,0.00017115117,0.0032970202,0.00023823309,0.5611974],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989562,0.00013370517,0.00007588315,0.00012678595,0.0006235514,0.00008387956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978083,0.00046586597,0.00017212468,0.000114834955,0.001143136,0.0002958712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071719306,0.00058188365,0.0010544615,0.0026604242,0.00080752163,0.0038537635,0.0016752796,0.0015960186,0.2701874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005653525,0.0002870757,0.00055739743,0.004401755,0.00052155677,0.0025600013,0.0013194287,0.0018837792,0.17720866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014641084,0.000019973893,0.000055787,0.0010919295,0.000007849613,0.00007333756,0.00004460016,0.00003339187,0.00009773702,0.0018066795,0.87247473,0.12427937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028890356,0.0000068120407,0.000089066125,0.0005358522,0.0000044657927,0.00015976072,0.000025640697,0.0000050164695,0.000019156381,0.00029153627,0.9988576,0.0000022087552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026437265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005313304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2701874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013727046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032325091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90386695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080237","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3878","title":"Litigating the Carceral Soundscape","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Silence; Soundscape; Prison; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Conscience; Subject (documents); Sound (geography); Aesthetics; Law; Criminology; History; Acoustics; Political science; Computer science; Art","score_opus":0.029690139098056224,"score_gpt":0.3069539763609938,"score_spread":0.2772638372629376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5206695,0.0036532634,0.029299265,0.054125108,0.0011962366,0.00016153653,0.00005251796,0.00022382344,0.39061868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98786086,0.00021662157,0.0006477146,0.0013353257,0.00009665399,0.00002739995,0.000004536144,0.000029182675,0.009781627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921381,0.0042182333,0.00032565155,0.000799953,0.0013492651,0.001168901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99169594,0.0046676095,0.0010672053,0.0009832425,0.0009209884,0.00066506607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057961154,0.00039493633,0.0004401363,0.0008144838,0.015865443,0.0115621975,0.0016865396,0.005172396,0.0048583234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01787833,0.00034013882,0.0005244486,0.00037663447,0.048158973,0.0053891996,0.010242099,0.006328682,0.00063546613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043382526,0.000036516456,0.0022805862,0.00017142683,0.000026008362,0.0028576467,0.17857316,0.00042517134,0.0016025504,0.78968745,0.005728949,0.018567225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004022034,0.00030494155,0.00598673,0.0016079738,0.00011365986,0.006354488,0.32102308,0.0020097813,0.0076649124,0.24852471,0.4061501,0.00021941526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006366544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006681186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015865443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004194618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040212995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030653179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385199243","doi":"10.4018/978-1-6684-3425-3.ch005","title":"The Art of Teaching","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Sociology; Traditional knowledge","score_opus":0.01854527311538433,"score_gpt":0.2872880412665934,"score_spread":0.26874276815120907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385199243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016763709,0.010015123,0.008351709,0.013308486,0.001547486,0.00003233231,0.000047926176,0.00017741323,0.96484315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2550695,0.014943009,0.011104584,0.009960358,0.0020636194,0.00023374372,0.0001078837,0.00059384387,0.7059235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971263,0.001347524,0.00007233273,0.00035823783,0.0008244563,0.00027106298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834025,0.0008184479,0.000084163315,0.00038402522,0.00017760541,0.00019552701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019374358,0.0006324192,0.00044395233,0.0011450807,0.008941672,0.011345583,0.0013924357,0.002074242,0.022363214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035941966,0.0002932635,0.0003765896,0.0011228492,0.03641451,0.008817208,0.0047762943,0.0052257446,0.0062239254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004469159,0.000009914006,0.00006572237,0.00006901848,0.0000020034627,0.000041822565,0.011928681,0.0000888249,0.00009228087,0.9346025,0.0321783,0.020916509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031352895,0.0000074670666,0.00007215053,0.00019879495,0.0000016032654,0.00009877225,0.003540444,0.000084926905,0.0001097918,0.11370916,0.8821685,0.0000053437443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012556001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017352102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022363214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071520163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005326351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07481241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385367869","doi":"10.59962/9780774837101-006","title":"Misunderstandings between Art and Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.024860889513132475,"score_gpt":0.20509179225833002,"score_spread":0.18023090274519754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385367869","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034621518,0.030192688,0.010281542,0.5606625,0.012283411,0.00007728423,0.00028132548,0.00020105492,0.35139868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8409462,0.011739299,0.0035306625,0.09581415,0.0064415066,0.000089432564,0.00012186165,0.00029183258,0.041025102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96189284,0.016363008,0.0022250868,0.004377653,0.012302607,0.002838792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9461733,0.03950207,0.002461536,0.00377814,0.0066035045,0.0014813665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03343941,0.00065126416,0.00088002667,0.0044394303,0.017231274,0.018350834,0.004831858,0.015124803,0.00399627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05207399,0.0010155216,0.00052900705,0.0047463505,0.11916923,0.020067437,0.007326943,0.017371407,0.0008942637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017710681,0.000012454879,0.000697205,0.00010191589,0.0000081813305,0.00050920446,0.10716024,0.00018795018,0.00011450693,0.81463706,0.059702765,0.016850822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013111727,0.000011401828,0.0015379293,0.0012450938,0.0000150360665,0.00054452615,0.05937397,0.00044480732,0.00031193852,0.248984,0.6874466,0.000071583134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21157302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.235135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21157302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0435683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02297502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42068303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385505370","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v32i2.6862","title":"Rectify: The Power of Restorative Justice After Wrongful Conviction by Lara Bazelon Boston: Beacon Press (2018) 237 pp.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Conviction; Restorative justice; Criminology; Power (physics); Political science; Law; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.024127129254703988,"score_gpt":0.3119173652749306,"score_spread":0.2877902360202266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385505370","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00040241395,0.22340602,0.00042012928,0.7370417,0.01430875,0.00001529651,0.000043623233,0.000061469116,0.024300488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047136158,0.28995746,0.0018426317,0.3965627,0.036372002,0.00022469889,0.00010753281,0.00050417666,0.22729264],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720013,0.0014743698,0.00011290146,0.00026985785,0.00061112066,0.00033157298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99398226,0.0038376958,0.00030630734,0.000170198,0.00095921446,0.00074432365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004644982,0.0009586333,0.0007648177,0.0012902226,0.007723948,0.008017589,0.002086258,0.009274311,0.015345831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012639782,0.0007322699,0.0004721165,0.001038688,0.007806942,0.010466725,0.00500458,0.019708956,0.0073768157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012000578,0.000012319833,0.00005290159,0.000079213336,0.0000029219002,0.000051817464,0.0016319074,0.000030241696,0.000026578375,0.017489497,0.95761275,0.022997867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013427831,0.0000108087615,0.000465927,0.0012992261,0.000005746932,0.00013863386,0.003991051,0.00006833446,0.00008437045,0.02098915,0.9729085,0.000024750565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03218493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078886636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03218493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057632457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008704271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06399518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385508917","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3779","title":"“You Keep Using That Word”: Why Privacy Doesn’t Mean What Lawyers Think","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Dignity; Word (group theory); Set (abstract data type); Law; Computer science; Linguistics; Internet privacy; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.043401098024199204,"score_gpt":0.29453704619981036,"score_spread":0.25113594817561113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385508917","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053948564,0.0060959463,0.006029985,0.9490553,0.0021224828,0.00001527553,0.000031051663,0.00008718393,0.031167831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26430306,0.006564647,0.0055111987,0.6973003,0.0030336934,0.00009893607,0.00006462178,0.00041685277,0.022706619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96119815,0.021916755,0.0011283951,0.0040256795,0.008378131,0.0033529035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9536134,0.032486252,0.0028460457,0.0018372438,0.0062379846,0.0029790755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024631517,0.0005229593,0.0006023079,0.0014028624,0.020622678,0.0189861,0.002270164,0.015237734,0.009459615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072025344,0.0007732744,0.000619464,0.0017115666,0.05404404,0.04023984,0.009066237,0.033955216,0.0039779297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003332189,0.000056441648,0.0018262111,0.0001716302,0.00002118042,0.00051654415,0.0927749,0.0000766751,0.00032071292,0.57070607,0.2924219,0.041074317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034411794,0.000038865102,0.00083278416,0.00071192445,0.000019091918,0.000718053,0.063088626,0.00025749204,0.0005545592,0.30848435,0.62515885,0.00010104133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022727365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01566831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024631517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009029372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009942256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13026547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385509223","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3737","title":"Seeing Like a Clinic","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Hengityssairauksien Tutkimussäätiö","keywords":"Praxis; Reflexivity; Sociology; Legal education; State (computer science); Political science; Poverty; Sovereignty; Law; Politics; Social science","score_opus":0.028595328986548076,"score_gpt":0.31100173339122605,"score_spread":0.28240640440467796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385509223","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023615712,0.0026510493,0.009388408,0.48510358,0.01617365,0.00048667667,0.0005019686,0.0015304048,0.46054858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18601158,0.0030363826,0.007492963,0.28408307,0.0035185723,0.00035491714,0.0003281796,0.00070488383,0.51446944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619436,0.0009948033,0.00009740607,0.00094130635,0.0004680557,0.0013041433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885484,0.00048064635,0.00033055444,0.0002512151,0.0005713086,0.009817855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016871812,0.0005940894,0.00041115316,0.00054669916,0.017364481,0.008464748,0.0020964094,0.006654341,0.2242494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059740916,0.00063558697,0.00082370354,0.00042519535,0.006798494,0.0076014474,0.011550597,0.012829919,0.035347298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000780831,0.0005142262,0.0033626342,0.00016095782,0.0000126317655,0.0028985413,0.011616583,0.0001522278,0.0016605261,0.057063617,0.8402251,0.08225488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029850187,0.00022413301,0.0015455218,0.00023210037,0.0000074415325,0.0021611894,0.018717328,0.00011771139,0.00026103936,0.009642113,0.9670173,0.0000441908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009292187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033971105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2242494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046761865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01639372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75018895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512092","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1390","title":"Vice, Universe, and Everything","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Mantra; Context (archaeology); Vice president; Statutory law; Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; History; Philosophy; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.035456778749210174,"score_gpt":0.29457408848870914,"score_spread":0.259117309739499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013385069,0.019063627,0.0011622484,0.23332466,0.003612692,0.00006911892,0.0007201052,0.00014551055,0.72851694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26964763,0.006587306,0.0012084418,0.22557794,0.0009263837,0.00006197559,0.00034018737,0.00009680427,0.49555334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636227,0.00029951797,0.00007691818,0.0004227153,0.0016064681,0.0012320966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983966,0.00036816238,0.00006858718,0.000061198894,0.0005950028,0.0005105166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014735023,0.00034317942,0.00023072089,0.00084095873,0.012326297,0.009005794,0.0014388566,0.0070683924,0.009326287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046376023,0.0003328739,0.00034855673,0.00083024794,0.0071402905,0.0022585618,0.0016762504,0.006741713,0.0012362824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001763758,0.0000100330235,0.0010311592,0.00005319672,0.000008012905,0.00021997862,0.001365276,0.00005298604,0.00028113407,0.60315156,0.3801251,0.013683808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011202145,0.000008667085,0.0023309668,0.000106210646,0.000015961077,0.00009804984,0.001929034,0.00006799108,0.00032400034,0.0106801605,0.98440003,0.000027874654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9134883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9599229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9134883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019564051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0572806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17404228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518179","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2803","title":"Book Note: Preventive Justice, by Andrew Ashworth &amp; Lucia Zedner","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Gerontology; Law; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.024667784194060762,"score_gpt":0.3126241338225306,"score_spread":0.2879563496284699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518179","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021643032,0.088382006,0.0005353157,0.7469425,0.06577154,0.00009037339,0.00038929677,0.000080653735,0.09759192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026875571,0.040908117,0.0005970946,0.38574076,0.04367342,0.00016652947,0.00020250764,0.00014729371,0.5258767],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982834,0.00039291504,0.00008856841,0.00029347918,0.0008139025,0.00012785479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939966,0.0035318728,0.00014600174,0.00018080513,0.0016069016,0.00053786003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026321309,0.001248773,0.0010745765,0.0019287384,0.005673423,0.006532859,0.002169797,0.01725905,0.023955744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010904035,0.0009928358,0.0006386498,0.0023741957,0.003982826,0.006240277,0.0020013198,0.011433701,0.01098531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013427635,0.0000035106855,0.000016527185,0.000013517929,6.8012196e-7,0.0000058004475,0.000028395105,0.000009606732,0.0000065020135,0.0016661409,0.9955343,0.0027137224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006651196,0.0000045422275,0.0003391413,0.00012900168,0.000003962266,0.000026303807,0.00012595016,0.000030868916,0.00001665806,0.0040173326,0.99529004,0.000009569039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10381602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3407879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10381602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057517984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009335935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20642352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518210","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2732","title":"From Rawls to Habermas: Towards A Theory of Grounded Impartiality in Canadian Administrative Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Jurisprudence; Law; Political philosophy; Sociology; Liberalism; Politics; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.03825883898303504,"score_gpt":0.330980714368145,"score_spread":0.29272187538510996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518210","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033906486,0.007928956,0.06700065,0.077432714,0.0007016032,0.00021706606,0.00024775896,0.000138931,0.8124259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93673426,0.0032679474,0.030742776,0.004905314,0.0001582213,0.00015481324,0.0001294609,0.00011791934,0.023789247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894114,0.0041111987,0.00026438854,0.0009577149,0.0035554036,0.0016998486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921504,0.0031976996,0.00041150866,0.000670241,0.0029545454,0.00061554037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010477008,0.0008584199,0.000959197,0.006883732,0.019595424,0.019360425,0.0044909935,0.0044903583,0.0047866753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015472551,0.0007306019,0.0011272389,0.007017701,0.078414135,0.01072391,0.007140686,0.009127979,0.0005153632],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025078323,0.000003435655,0.000073503936,0.000011962122,0.0000017089392,0.000028735074,0.005750587,0.00017670638,0.00001242068,0.9909089,0.000944059,0.0020854436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010994928,0.000007473816,0.0005824285,0.0001521864,0.000017235106,0.000037596787,0.007388167,0.0019237682,0.00007018641,0.92658895,0.063178755,0.000042276042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9065127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88074386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14270447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14270447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09817031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9943413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518215","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1028","title":"Book Review: Cultural Law: International, Comparative, and Indigenous, by James A. R. Nafziger, Robert Kirkwood Paterson &amp; Alison Dundes Renteln","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Philosophy; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.033136169116523596,"score_gpt":0.33504283929694717,"score_spread":0.30190667018042355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518215","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009382717,0.91141605,0.00022999139,0.04599567,0.023596583,0.000017156088,0.0001766248,0.000033945966,0.018440137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017608723,0.85941255,0.00040453218,0.020203186,0.028104883,0.00005696101,0.00032366387,0.00008439271,0.08964905],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912816,0.00016635665,0.00006446648,0.00009086221,0.00049529783,0.0000549842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946984,0.0026517988,0.00035149744,0.0001275567,0.0017952075,0.0003755678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013904043,0.0012023115,0.0015181561,0.0050441385,0.0013471622,0.0048969844,0.001615859,0.002881321,0.031409226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078069745,0.0006653195,0.00051910913,0.0089660315,0.002163635,0.0058819163,0.0014750775,0.0037479268,0.013956059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039309484,0.000003781647,0.000026403586,0.0003033219,0.0000028396955,0.000007126994,0.000028750672,0.000018837805,0.000015921662,0.0012262743,0.9793897,0.018973153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004408137,0.000005484127,0.00026032978,0.0011686604,0.0000066571747,0.00007231241,0.000086768516,0.000017862358,0.000018279918,0.0011453396,0.9972084,0.000005426949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018027471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056942463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031409226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035328215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007323582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105074346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385592267","doi":"10.59962/9780774860376-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.012433970310168001,"score_gpt":0.2090743115369516,"score_spread":0.19664034122678362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385592267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022881702,0.00066107936,0.00017064897,0.00255784,0.0014802385,0.000026966494,0.0009272806,0.00032808707,0.993619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010579025,0.00043943632,0.00008428066,0.0008658612,0.00022564505,0.000011135444,0.00035839886,0.00011180034,0.99684554],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916124,0.00005674077,0.000034452845,0.00023477923,0.00037516686,0.000137651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989428,0.00017478682,0.000054161566,0.00014560987,0.00034581101,0.0003367662],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004292015,0.0010217568,0.00092647487,0.0013583668,0.002760254,0.008172717,0.0011850529,0.00520307,0.93396777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002312415,0.00036471625,0.00055182027,0.0012517852,0.001291711,0.0029404464,0.0027712346,0.0027059063,0.90243286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039175706,0.000036365644,0.00028028298,0.00023499462,0.000004852379,0.00013492907,0.00008890813,0.00005014416,0.00050047634,0.009887168,0.8537184,0.13502428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000385137,0.000005194658,0.00023333245,0.00008547372,9.1569353e-7,0.000043580454,0.000057318433,0.00002548317,0.00006842392,0.0007478247,0.9987262,0.0000024354167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003585464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008103628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93396777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016410274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019712914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09418696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385599656","doi":"10.59962/9780774835558-004","title":"<i>Eldridge v British Columbia:</i> Effective Communication and the Sounds of Silence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Silence; History; Communication; Art; Psychology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.009025457296157374,"score_gpt":0.19299705251922492,"score_spread":0.18397159522306755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385599656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053736847,0.04137674,0.0002505344,0.0471522,0.0021852509,0.00005180088,0.00035276805,0.0000798955,0.9031772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1198726,0.013834077,0.00024399659,0.030292386,0.00051155855,0.00009021419,0.00017604946,0.000105403014,0.8348736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870074,0.00018108827,0.000031019128,0.00008674825,0.00040589902,0.0005945033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879885,0.0005463779,0.00005836635,0.00005139953,0.00033538893,0.00020958282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007082276,0.00065576227,0.00035771413,0.0013529983,0.016058452,0.009287961,0.0019351754,0.00884417,0.033021316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030998134,0.00050812453,0.00024163541,0.0023807995,0.006651083,0.0030756416,0.0022891555,0.008584219,0.0044661807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025566269,0.000013000503,0.00042042873,0.00016214675,0.0000050069093,0.00036286813,0.0150025925,0.00006487191,0.00026446176,0.14048696,0.8142902,0.028901935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008631024,0.0000052094415,0.0022581378,0.0005734803,0.000010279803,0.000105818064,0.0132617345,0.00003544194,0.00020139752,0.0064314376,0.97707474,0.000033682914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9560804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98581576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043919623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033326346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056716807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24180067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385600159","doi":"10.59962/9780774833769-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; Government of Canada; Canada Council for the Arts; Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.012228495067955755,"score_gpt":0.20980675145612548,"score_spread":0.19757825638816973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385600159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034922155,0.0009539136,0.00022993593,0.0036811875,0.0017976685,0.000026726264,0.0008574336,0.00035749763,0.9917464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014496482,0.00071309286,0.00011609778,0.001334724,0.0003218391,0.000011636342,0.00037256893,0.0001208697,0.99555945],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937624,0.00004761865,0.000027883518,0.00016580282,0.00027917352,0.000103398874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990478,0.00015487194,0.00005931282,0.00013339239,0.00028714692,0.00031748455],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042822823,0.00091088325,0.0007048028,0.0012146628,0.0022559767,0.007172592,0.0010757487,0.0047439816,0.91349477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021395872,0.00032951595,0.00044760376,0.0010726756,0.0011981427,0.0028252904,0.002693184,0.0021749248,0.86175746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030851064,0.000036984857,0.00035091394,0.000221447,0.0000044994813,0.00014752928,0.00010593252,0.00004364548,0.0005497874,0.009181301,0.8466598,0.14266728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030922567,0.000004956402,0.000227138,0.00008266148,8.587764e-7,0.000053162035,0.00006033719,0.000022979384,0.00006916347,0.0006583243,0.9988153,0.0000019892263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026668364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006168726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086505234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012751167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016747996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.123389244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385600447","doi":"10.59962/9780774835404-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada; Canada Council for the Arts; Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.01670085351511434,"score_gpt":0.22515129715923443,"score_spread":0.20845044364412008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385600447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026550997,0.0007642586,0.00019589732,0.0028617217,0.0016413218,0.000026904368,0.0009527449,0.00037884168,0.9929128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001226492,0.0005353327,0.00009197856,0.0009441978,0.0002621755,0.000011377778,0.00037657266,0.00013124681,0.9964205],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916065,0.00005995074,0.00003565866,0.00022901566,0.00037887722,0.00013593325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988385,0.00019158526,0.00006080835,0.00016031305,0.0003687434,0.00037998985],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045063268,0.0010003824,0.00088030763,0.0014071809,0.0027588368,0.008598126,0.0012609882,0.0051775584,0.9314852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025223286,0.00036061704,0.0005325107,0.0012451658,0.0013698114,0.0031901943,0.0029693085,0.0026119333,0.89939106],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003613887,0.000036411617,0.00030184735,0.00024917375,0.0000048924644,0.00014321512,0.00010532485,0.000050454943,0.0005010314,0.010550711,0.85202235,0.13599847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033068088,0.000004902215,0.00021524406,0.00008621286,8.7056986e-7,0.000044031203,0.00006508284,0.000023595192,0.00006636445,0.000737488,0.99875057,0.0000022845907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032059296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00719624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068514824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015741864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020491944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097728014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385721675","doi":"10.59962/9780774816762-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.01117193369966644,"score_gpt":0.20929744865814445,"score_spread":0.19812551495847802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385721675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030069685,0.0007630879,0.00019423188,0.0027776808,0.0014164353,0.00002854437,0.00089623505,0.00034539893,0.99327785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012614899,0.00049870554,0.00009489159,0.0009040068,0.00022010104,0.000011026304,0.00034436898,0.000106734165,0.9965585],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922955,0.000052739968,0.00003280522,0.00022080254,0.00033514466,0.00012894279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989827,0.0001705997,0.000053822954,0.00013333664,0.00033075904,0.00032879753],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000407775,0.0010499711,0.0009272926,0.0013047421,0.0027303111,0.007818038,0.0012720852,0.005399676,0.9335515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021850816,0.00036683827,0.00055213465,0.0012049811,0.001262193,0.003019007,0.0026563054,0.0026015886,0.90083885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046236095,0.00004394247,0.00035478635,0.00027364332,0.0000058683963,0.00017507243,0.00010744802,0.000056178895,0.00064137083,0.010325954,0.83082324,0.15714629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044167878,0.000006416652,0.00028876972,0.000091276575,0.0000011301204,0.00005476775,0.00007364354,0.00002998722,0.000080882455,0.0007540584,0.9986119,0.0000026306927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00326073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007440864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06644851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014667726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017701758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09478074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385722221","doi":"10.59962/9780774823081-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.014946400216729987,"score_gpt":0.21334396979868706,"score_spread":0.19839756958195706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385722221","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029669644,0.00082176586,0.00021652132,0.0029583839,0.0015720918,0.00002911159,0.0009308089,0.00038972948,0.99278486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012880149,0.00053207186,0.000103016384,0.0009926916,0.0002534651,0.000011782867,0.00036685955,0.00012222944,0.99632996],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916315,0.00005792083,0.000035159184,0.00024136604,0.00036740032,0.00013496955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890864,0.00018234002,0.000059539223,0.00014666418,0.00034447078,0.0003583453],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042823068,0.0010472204,0.00091966195,0.0013436474,0.0027363512,0.008144426,0.0012923571,0.0054187006,0.9317402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023614943,0.00036741875,0.00055690174,0.0012143557,0.0012928341,0.0030983018,0.0028092768,0.002649965,0.89840615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043512857,0.000041303752,0.0003321687,0.0002677539,0.0000056590698,0.0001672539,0.00010567761,0.00005388422,0.00060059456,0.010327008,0.8330804,0.1549748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040529976,0.0000059355907,0.00025762102,0.000088989334,0.0000010644984,0.000053153977,0.00006735511,0.00002788241,0.0000762695,0.0007454206,0.9986696,0.0000025217191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029786131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067586987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068259776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014647571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018244635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09736431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385767143","doi":"10.1111/tesg.12586","title":"Personal, Political and Public: Socio‐Legal Changes from a Relational Perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Framing (construction); Praxis; Hegemony; Politics; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Gender studies; Human sexuality; Everyday life; Gesture; Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.036620278231875705,"score_gpt":0.3004870471702962,"score_spread":0.2638667689384205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385767143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36992252,0.0030535434,0.007499623,0.13888103,0.00084959087,0.0000666099,0.00011165563,0.000091094356,0.47952434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942497,0.0002533207,0.00016364631,0.0011756931,0.00008182686,0.00001073727,0.000007057344,0.000021741324,0.004036367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98815525,0.007558939,0.00023284348,0.0007324548,0.0016335455,0.0016869893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99258775,0.003450663,0.0010965416,0.00071143365,0.0005558635,0.0015977654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007728324,0.00022496244,0.00033940386,0.0017057916,0.0154573405,0.018748308,0.0018036315,0.004014053,0.010248694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012076025,0.0003534949,0.0002912784,0.0021488592,0.060537796,0.013089511,0.013306948,0.0067280415,0.00047730145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010567221,0.000042226377,0.0009893859,0.000027318625,0.0000064035266,0.00048824717,0.42282677,0.00015199141,0.00028301132,0.5666174,0.003040689,0.0055160653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010041565,0.000028036236,0.0023628667,0.00014443239,0.000008401578,0.0003554465,0.65568846,0.00023813147,0.00022819932,0.10625014,0.23465954,0.00002635919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014316548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016597457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018748308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012045855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00546467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087399244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385860827","doi":"10.59962/9780774856058-012","title":"Canadian Aboriginal Languages and the Protection of Cultural Heritage","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cultural heritage; History; Political science; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.008799744464513322,"score_gpt":0.2096702449766132,"score_spread":0.2008705005120999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385860827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014228146,0.04652204,0.00036301685,0.022343403,0.0008430026,0.000050164235,0.00018827213,0.00004335651,0.9154186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33070734,0.044341326,0.0013796285,0.004467056,0.00024713497,0.000050117687,0.00012998424,0.00008610283,0.6185913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848974,0.00022346736,0.000028209819,0.00009079784,0.000487747,0.00068001554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989531,0.0002450159,0.00003978292,0.00004808604,0.00046440674,0.00024951575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010248481,0.0006204235,0.00036438438,0.0018670086,0.018033532,0.008001302,0.0011635731,0.0020765648,0.013670453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002026983,0.0004025244,0.00022433465,0.0034042883,0.010881029,0.0015553398,0.0017849104,0.003565149,0.0006605224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040162395,0.00003106029,0.0014529773,0.00028334372,0.000013476999,0.0005301722,0.05140976,0.00042756967,0.00032025675,0.6670821,0.19296575,0.08544328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006323635,0.000008864396,0.003703286,0.00030432764,0.000014023925,0.000094737945,0.016809454,0.00009267635,0.00012600618,0.01202098,0.9667923,0.000027126238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99619436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99858105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0905643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0905643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18842337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65709305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385864821","doi":"10.1515/9780774818216-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre; Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.01117193369966644,"score_gpt":0.20929744865814445,"score_spread":0.19812551495847802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385864821","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030069685,0.0007630879,0.00019423188,0.0027776808,0.0014164353,0.00002854437,0.00089623505,0.00034539893,0.99327785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012614899,0.00049870554,0.00009489159,0.0009040068,0.00022010104,0.000011026304,0.00034436898,0.000106734165,0.9965585],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922955,0.000052739968,0.00003280522,0.00022080254,0.00033514466,0.00012894279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989827,0.0001705997,0.000053822954,0.00013333664,0.00033075904,0.00032879753],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000407775,0.0010499711,0.0009272926,0.0013047421,0.0027303111,0.007818038,0.0012720852,0.005399676,0.9335515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021850816,0.00036683827,0.00055213465,0.0012049811,0.001262193,0.003019007,0.0026563054,0.0026015886,0.90083885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046236095,0.00004394247,0.00035478635,0.00027364332,0.0000058683963,0.00017507243,0.00010744802,0.000056178895,0.00064137083,0.010325954,0.83082324,0.15714629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044167878,0.000006416652,0.00028876972,0.000091276575,0.0000011301204,0.00005476775,0.00007364354,0.00002998722,0.000080882455,0.0007540584,0.9986119,0.0000026306927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00326073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007440864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06644851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014667726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017701758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09478074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385865619","doi":"10.59962/9780774851602","title":"Last Word","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Word (group theory); Linguistics; Computer science; Natural language processing; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01498628590305586,"score_gpt":0.208116087294286,"score_spread":0.19312980139123012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385865619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001978199,0.0027445105,0.0004694317,0.004219097,0.0052555255,0.000036037156,0.0007734628,0.00034101517,0.98596305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014623088,0.0009976061,0.00017867185,0.001501771,0.00053862535,0.000013382893,0.00032545778,0.00019702999,0.99478513],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907887,0.00007858059,0.00003708169,0.00014863929,0.00052284513,0.00013396321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988933,0.00012057503,0.000039016995,0.00013067543,0.0006622015,0.00015426017],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004516554,0.00090488343,0.00061344035,0.0020818233,0.0043802396,0.007921241,0.001451715,0.0020781425,0.40349427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002363711,0.0003504775,0.00044914157,0.0024499204,0.0017565932,0.005429376,0.002458937,0.0030969235,0.27731067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062536974,0.0000051790707,0.000049767776,0.00005862455,0.0000012105069,0.0000415936,0.00031783423,0.000018168057,0.000082157254,0.03983614,0.9238618,0.035721242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.784402e-7,8.9998537e-7,0.000032584496,0.00002977802,4.3117862e-7,0.000025797388,0.00007086299,0.0000063310076,0.000019258618,0.0007940606,0.99901795,0.0000014739103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07021238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13214499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59650576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052484274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385865846","doi":"10.59962/9780774855433-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Front (military); Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.014295704351458957,"score_gpt":0.2075195296217981,"score_spread":0.19322382527033913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385865846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031290163,0.0008043251,0.00020064834,0.0028330027,0.0014648945,0.000029777246,0.00090269756,0.0003567954,0.9930949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012829634,0.0005202884,0.00009812634,0.00095701264,0.0002310029,0.0000113698725,0.00035695307,0.00010733007,0.9964349],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992299,0.000052013766,0.000032851447,0.00022409225,0.00033353173,0.00012755443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900764,0.0001664483,0.000052592808,0.00013021848,0.00032369661,0.00031939102],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040126257,0.0010443208,0.00092990225,0.0012949248,0.002697968,0.0076614833,0.001287468,0.0053568287,0.93323463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021339892,0.00036302983,0.0005614723,0.0011840324,0.0012300389,0.0029447107,0.0026291658,0.0025508166,0.9006909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004765194,0.000046006004,0.00037493097,0.00027954727,0.0000061005007,0.00018435864,0.00010857262,0.000056121902,0.00066407834,0.01036353,0.8263009,0.16156822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004558035,0.000006679806,0.00029307196,0.000092431284,0.0000011643707,0.000056757457,0.00007380877,0.000030210425,0.00008176254,0.00074987,0.9986071,0.0000026387256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030719507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006927784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06676537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013965227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016819311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095232725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385868788","doi":"10.59962/9780774855181-008","title":"Canadian Anthropology and Ideas of Aboriginal Emendation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Anthropology; Sociology","score_opus":0.015317982554167331,"score_gpt":0.24382126536772408,"score_spread":0.22850328281355675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385868788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009715693,0.017106455,0.0008166089,0.031268645,0.0010918924,0.000035115027,0.00009360213,0.000040907773,0.9398311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36078918,0.01534822,0.0017215989,0.004762992,0.00037806144,0.00006194219,0.00007029413,0.00011057354,0.61675715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839777,0.00041368816,0.000035274265,0.0001433041,0.0004664556,0.0005435672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870574,0.00040847273,0.000048350008,0.000071106035,0.0005480749,0.00021824388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018370819,0.00064623746,0.00041317588,0.0036743467,0.02395473,0.011221279,0.00170269,0.0026028126,0.01679373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003331415,0.00047476738,0.00024830087,0.0042042597,0.023457102,0.0030632217,0.0024758512,0.0049968334,0.00071565073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011337151,0.000008434525,0.00027169022,0.000056132358,0.0000026738471,0.00010005749,0.038536333,0.00008892587,0.00005720378,0.89607704,0.051921193,0.012869048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006581046,0.0000051422644,0.0014639026,0.00021580221,0.00000941026,0.00006076066,0.027341334,0.00010487023,0.00007714541,0.050059654,0.92063683,0.000018518624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98627627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9937452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100859724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100859724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.087850876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.731792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385870533","doi":"10.1515/9780774818483-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.01741853321799777,"score_gpt":0.20725393205454404,"score_spread":0.18983539883654627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385870533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002921104,0.0008083912,0.00020592361,0.0029319692,0.0015576896,0.000029033803,0.00092465145,0.00037107136,0.9928791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012580825,0.0005272445,0.00009843248,0.0009790002,0.00024585493,0.000011579772,0.00036191812,0.00011586759,0.9964019],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991748,0.0000570911,0.00003468448,0.00023684825,0.00036100927,0.00013555572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989299,0.00017972985,0.00005761844,0.00014420491,0.0003407289,0.00034783856],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042385203,0.0010490747,0.0009290317,0.0013326234,0.0027445457,0.008059105,0.0012981868,0.0054326705,0.9328059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023149368,0.0003689739,0.0005628738,0.0012157549,0.0012851898,0.0030721843,0.0027769369,0.002631723,0.9001694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044317807,0.00004146559,0.00033401637,0.00027082008,0.00000573588,0.00016835,0.000105972365,0.00005404085,0.00060488755,0.010240708,0.83514905,0.15298067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041282456,0.000006016308,0.0002612933,0.000089943685,0.0000010733593,0.000052844167,0.00006860923,0.000027455615,0.00007602858,0.00073734164,0.99867284,0.0000025333313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030369398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006933728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.067194104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001478956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018068651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09584415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385870741","doi":"10.59962/9780774851954","title":"Unnatural Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014311190846546515,"score_gpt":0.21110466811686293,"score_spread":0.19679347727031643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385870741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00054205547,0.008185769,0.0008671374,0.010644866,0.0012520083,0.000024283385,0.00013109196,0.00011385036,0.978239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02772597,0.007485157,0.0010495805,0.016700951,0.00041540287,0.000049330334,0.00021773599,0.00014642939,0.9462095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973846,0.00020646132,0.00004608625,0.00023296679,0.0015801252,0.00054972566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886477,0.00023005619,0.00004189511,0.000106448504,0.0006543193,0.00010249322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010694263,0.00078633183,0.0003625854,0.0013869565,0.01142557,0.0077462615,0.0012943484,0.0037309618,0.021282405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033059558,0.0003605462,0.00040759565,0.0015038205,0.01195663,0.004039422,0.0022801831,0.005597404,0.0051671867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031219952,0.000004989586,0.0000901747,0.000036501548,0.0000015164803,0.000048936414,0.0011778912,0.0000728716,0.00004216415,0.6380699,0.3445574,0.015894562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.852926e-7,0.0000010802255,0.00010592846,0.000074852804,0.000001260933,0.000033234297,0.00028375894,0.000035361703,0.000035049394,0.010226677,0.989198,0.0000040042723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7810604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8698855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7810604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036520243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05336851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44045794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386229678","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4552217","title":"From Brushstrokes to Keystrokes: Revolutionizing Art Crime Investigations With AI","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering","score_opus":0.015113740294337886,"score_gpt":0.28166757578220036,"score_spread":0.2665538354878625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386229678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045506977,0.0059678173,0.0908627,0.11520208,0.0024392933,0.00017741861,0.00018138537,0.0006142865,0.73904806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88982207,0.0030714595,0.03892655,0.016826719,0.0012450888,0.0003079731,0.000120812125,0.00047984827,0.04919939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903984,0.0061236615,0.00020633759,0.00084599014,0.0017189971,0.0007065711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742097,0.019384611,0.00090879865,0.0028834774,0.0016507042,0.00096267555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008196244,0.00060346455,0.0005867497,0.0030764139,0.007900838,0.011912815,0.0025382955,0.003869981,0.019538503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038935002,0.0004086214,0.00048792295,0.0018268758,0.023458315,0.014414106,0.008858087,0.008465488,0.002872468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001322698,0.00016435892,0.0022376091,0.0002428479,0.00002948685,0.00023472472,0.023792772,0.0008572853,0.0006630794,0.6742101,0.06085475,0.23658077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049242994,0.00006300299,0.0022621998,0.00069006317,0.00004322545,0.00021173261,0.022675348,0.0033249343,0.0017708014,0.73512924,0.23372662,0.000053573207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010589606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01940831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019538503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00269573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006211895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06536275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386246336","doi":"10.1080/1535685x.2023.2246791","title":"Judgment <b> <i>Judgment</i> </b> , by Thomas Giddens, Abingdon: Routledge, 2022, 105 pp","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Literature","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.011351492739863911,"score_gpt":0.270057538427361,"score_spread":0.2587060456874971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386246336","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048519264,0.35775813,0.0023940736,0.42553037,0.04958787,0.000049912724,0.000787536,0.00020756113,0.16319938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021543691,0.2076554,0.0028522997,0.094107404,0.019854361,0.00020320521,0.00084462704,0.00079706986,0.6521419],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974535,0.0007650669,0.00016865616,0.00034664708,0.0011025703,0.00016357789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954542,0.0021196248,0.00027101237,0.00023538464,0.0015434083,0.0003763971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025963108,0.0014537798,0.00066243793,0.0017248556,0.005025106,0.008547187,0.0014169802,0.0053674034,0.04003692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015568841,0.0007588331,0.00047256335,0.0030513634,0.0052231946,0.010151693,0.002439219,0.006380915,0.022180744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040197156,0.000002783866,0.000025044665,0.00008257614,0.0000012260399,0.00001747156,0.00037131298,0.000025035613,0.000024298162,0.007951069,0.9797085,0.011786783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019052337,0.0000019950955,0.00015190951,0.00030440092,0.0000011891127,0.000029723764,0.0007339631,0.000024442803,0.00004032259,0.008961525,0.98974216,0.0000063663883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07064982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11118189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07064982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007439593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011490057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14047712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386280553","doi":"10.4337/ccs.2023.0007","title":"Competing visions of ‘the people’ in Australia: First Nations and the state","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Constitutional Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Constitutionalism; Constitution; State (computer science); Commonwealth; Democracy; Sovereignty; Law; Sociology; High Court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Vision; Geography; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.1349947796212766,"score_gpt":0.41089694808939337,"score_spread":0.27590216846811677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386280553","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4290413,0.0126146935,0.0027989259,0.061472077,0.0002870668,0.000046211528,0.000034836114,0.000017519154,0.4936873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98212767,0.0016178892,0.0005070237,0.0021065641,0.000037047415,0.00003160081,0.000009174356,0.0000061443525,0.013556915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518484,0.0028149397,0.000107467386,0.00037272635,0.00073449133,0.0007855845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862266,0.00057500304,0.0001375115,0.00011672296,0.0001693617,0.00037878446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034750507,0.00021284392,0.00035422202,0.001367738,0.013285459,0.009549333,0.0008454943,0.0028116314,0.0022097363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003835124,0.0002559835,0.00029079727,0.0010219787,0.043937616,0.0061425064,0.005742234,0.0047577326,0.0001241272],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056391928,0.000011154715,0.0006825703,0.00002259432,0.000002168342,0.00014277286,0.09283017,0.00006975694,0.00012271552,0.90115833,0.00085315184,0.0040989895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020075773,0.00008349133,0.016818551,0.0006406358,0.000021822261,0.0006047025,0.22114027,0.00067033863,0.00049932726,0.4916017,0.26781604,0.00008299041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.108956456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15320586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108956456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016373409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0104895765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21664453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386307022","doi":"10.22215/crr/23i22r-f","title":"Points de vue 2STNBNCG sur l’accès à la justice : une évaluation des besoins juridiques: une évaluation des besoins juridiques","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.09143553604597505,"score_gpt":0.3530825089208608,"score_spread":0.26164697287488575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386307022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8001878,0.011204083,0.0016605973,0.039081227,0.00044027326,0.0014489755,0.004538035,0.000053700645,0.14138523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94383603,0.005040788,0.0025361557,0.004982353,0.0001040035,0.000792498,0.0014368211,0.00003552905,0.041235834],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9696935,0.0044980594,0.0012478479,0.0009964721,0.020071667,0.0034923512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9545356,0.009745342,0.0024766712,0.00065781147,0.028669586,0.003914967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021764206,0.00035086932,0.0006260993,0.0063704816,0.010637305,0.008399007,0.0018948365,0.0022462276,0.0070126653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04504063,0.00044682066,0.00065973314,0.008485816,0.006207587,0.0030839646,0.0038261574,0.0025652533,0.00050171436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006734746,0.00037496237,0.35211915,0.0022759226,0.00020815116,0.0009401648,0.24492861,0.0012012076,0.0035608702,0.06661279,0.052337896,0.27476677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053961958,0.00042709394,0.5818322,0.0021801845,0.00022059047,0.00020885427,0.20890354,0.00039180813,0.0032013846,0.0022949586,0.20011494,0.00017051716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94395626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9736466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94395626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0572092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18120646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41508377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386327423","doi":"10.52230/qfya1465","title":"'Peter Cane, Lisa Ford, and Mark McMillan (Editors), The Cambridge Legal History of Australia'","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Australian Canadian and Aotearoa New Zealand Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cane; Art history; History; Archaeology; Biology","score_opus":0.047046473898793344,"score_gpt":0.2996587979175941,"score_spread":0.25261232401880074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386327423","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023467983,0.88391703,0.00029658023,0.068379186,0.02804081,0.000018587016,0.0000626246,0.000028163979,0.019022333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005885946,0.7678285,0.00070748077,0.019521754,0.032540593,0.000057147783,0.00013502939,0.00007635238,0.17324722],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981634,0.00042611433,0.000100915706,0.00016852272,0.0010169658,0.00012412039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963064,0.001764904,0.00034586678,0.00010333047,0.0010806549,0.00039877757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020536869,0.0011834753,0.0010608551,0.0031390272,0.0022593893,0.0064015887,0.0015594303,0.0031357568,0.016661922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008333189,0.00076903636,0.00048040418,0.0041395137,0.0030317036,0.0068600215,0.0015827352,0.0052766665,0.0076303864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007859235,0.0000036387532,0.00006662522,0.00031104268,0.000004046452,0.000044593125,0.0006041873,0.000043269472,0.000025354733,0.009219692,0.94982797,0.039841756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002784191,0.000003558811,0.00034292266,0.00044596876,0.000003876719,0.000076325705,0.0003454462,0.000028711373,0.000015711077,0.003174261,0.99555475,0.000005703013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04957061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12200913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04957061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053317323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008430287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09856415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386330762","doi":"10.5204/thesis.eprints.242466","title":"The datafied polity: Voter privacy in the age of data-driven political campaigning","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Queensland University of Technology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Telstra Foundation; Australian Government","keywords":"Polity; Democracy; Information privacy; Politics; Political science; Value (mathematics); Internet privacy; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.035257509032286534,"score_gpt":0.31148215257664524,"score_spread":0.2762246435443587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386330762","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16255914,0.008587895,0.042850263,0.27783877,0.0010000359,0.000107723215,0.00021101644,0.000069432106,0.5067758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967292,0.0028549077,0.0028855824,0.007008703,0.00031630372,0.00006587933,0.00004386777,0.000039932307,0.01949286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873492,0.007883977,0.00029871485,0.0009085668,0.0024695112,0.0010899642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98448783,0.009862463,0.0010164329,0.002416296,0.0014110266,0.0008059571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021082036,0.00018523529,0.00042128103,0.0009957895,0.007285721,0.013577998,0.0009322109,0.0034843232,0.003940152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027186807,0.0005090182,0.00048585763,0.001262559,0.036274776,0.016213143,0.00948786,0.008694965,0.0007095379],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014940505,0.000010934158,0.00053384464,0.000025383046,0.0000029376731,0.000064928994,0.024315007,0.00012896807,0.00010298081,0.9652129,0.0020109406,0.00757636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015867347,0.000039635106,0.0020881726,0.00035177055,0.000011727138,0.00015167965,0.013178175,0.0010970151,0.0005973009,0.7744528,0.20798941,0.00002640945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009337104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005961987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021082036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008148553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007126356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11149377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386489591","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3784","title":"Implicating The System: Judicial Discourses in The Sentencing of Indigenous Women by Elspeth Kaiser- Derrick","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Criminology; Sentence; Narrative; Sociology; Law; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012376586638820576,"score_gpt":0.2746210732082839,"score_spread":0.2622444865694633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386489591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6067045,0.0147331795,0.0030253935,0.25645605,0.0015694696,0.000096609765,0.000044877565,0.00007502809,0.1172949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9508152,0.0050548674,0.0011939281,0.021536049,0.00025012085,0.000052818774,0.000011972837,0.000028410534,0.021056615],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485356,0.0033085619,0.00013304816,0.00021836413,0.0007124907,0.00077396765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904406,0.008055949,0.00032087055,0.00012533649,0.00076998473,0.00028728604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072077606,0.00025269095,0.0002586517,0.00075462606,0.017466905,0.0056576356,0.0013040022,0.0038158929,0.0013780495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017644307,0.00032775768,0.0001355204,0.0005166248,0.013444619,0.0038813967,0.0036583531,0.006577752,0.00014065261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027362019,0.00004258721,0.0019607288,0.00011303645,0.000009531081,0.002857265,0.8787469,0.00016841675,0.00086339505,0.063293815,0.03279903,0.01911788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000079194515,0.0000512496,0.0056727733,0.000598506,0.000020628933,0.000776612,0.84152615,0.00025131233,0.0015202758,0.009817872,0.13968106,0.00007559666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09569733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1404858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09569733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047419984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007786358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19028062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386504778","doi":"10.1515/9781772126716","title":"Rights and the City","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Alberta Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Government of Canada; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta; Canada Council for the Arts; Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences; Government of Alberta","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.014967682715837781,"score_gpt":0.2077792284977006,"score_spread":0.19281154578186283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386504778","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008843768,0.014380702,0.001540681,0.031899787,0.0011001253,0.000039817172,0.00026301452,0.00008445074,0.9418477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5113224,0.012244803,0.0019414454,0.007736849,0.0004089252,0.00006735643,0.00028747306,0.00016779048,0.46582302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975816,0.0004400923,0.00003313816,0.000223259,0.00055829796,0.0011635356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913234,0.00014513683,0.000047533988,0.000105129686,0.0002612064,0.00030865023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001001095,0.00060702435,0.0004130451,0.0017125949,0.021747224,0.015299377,0.0014097622,0.0023437722,0.018008221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017340645,0.000254692,0.00044135473,0.003312456,0.04496577,0.0055841706,0.0068581174,0.0033617525,0.0013143483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005447617,0.0000028927607,0.00027646622,0.000025847026,0.0000017209943,0.000053668256,0.009869358,0.00009963487,0.000034492805,0.9475185,0.031933732,0.010178164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004134339,0.000004147956,0.0012097287,0.0001303711,0.000003967648,0.000054126718,0.012379455,0.000055261953,0.00004562428,0.054810528,0.9312886,0.000014063128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9186927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9462069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9186927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06588414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06702723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47802514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386515410","doi":"10.1515/9781772126716-004","title":"2. The Right to the City as an Emerging Norm","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Alberta Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021577680833249048,"score_gpt":0.23960854747040572,"score_spread":0.21803086663715668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386515410","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01662803,0.0014829498,0.01089696,0.031408716,0.0004231099,0.00006752287,0.00011838638,0.000040888037,0.93893343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71259636,0.0029517116,0.014573615,0.012220727,0.00053802587,0.00036612057,0.00028252942,0.00014466236,0.25632626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955455,0.0015060016,0.00016738297,0.00073596835,0.0012774824,0.0007676749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998444,0.00046331517,0.00016893944,0.00026397774,0.00044205796,0.00021775805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030601025,0.0002922542,0.0002628328,0.000940286,0.0059964405,0.015125493,0.0010420594,0.005284854,0.010242519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002955187,0.00023335646,0.00058574846,0.0010399988,0.029533269,0.009456296,0.0060339514,0.0063073584,0.0017531461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013838387,0.0000030164076,0.00009226876,0.000008098557,3.1153343e-7,0.000020665882,0.0020564583,0.00004959814,0.000027745591,0.9946443,0.0015231776,0.0015731726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000098578075,0.00001579104,0.0011157945,0.00025063092,0.000004068355,0.00013383321,0.008201121,0.00047938124,0.00026742343,0.5087596,0.4807392,0.000023328455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032015294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031409744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032015294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008384682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01076467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06365788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386707143","doi":"10.1017/9781009334051.002","title":"Grammars of Critique and Colonial Accusation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal law; Criminalization; Wrongdoing; Law; Political science; Politics; Redress; Dominion; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.026795114769808212,"score_gpt":0.2553871450943761,"score_spread":0.22859203032456787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386707143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066287317,0.013024309,0.0017657905,0.016259098,0.0011050466,0.00001732832,0.000024624518,0.00005012811,0.96112484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.664383,0.012617256,0.0017566542,0.0075275255,0.0018053376,0.00012071056,0.00007942996,0.000365732,0.31134436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996015,0.0024282555,0.00007284999,0.00030057342,0.0008377561,0.00034544457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967269,0.0021771737,0.00018716557,0.00027039918,0.00051328033,0.00012514398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00226121,0.00074307236,0.00047953415,0.0023201627,0.009065723,0.010281709,0.0013766466,0.0028188587,0.005837877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075775427,0.00030474924,0.00025549874,0.002346844,0.039775696,0.005362508,0.0037049549,0.004407399,0.00091932726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033997496,0.0000035807254,0.000072298135,0.000032735865,0.0000012107184,0.000098151846,0.02669106,0.000041154533,0.000037606704,0.9577035,0.011496332,0.003819004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003917251,0.0000055392607,0.0002284782,0.00036836322,0.0000038343223,0.00018939069,0.013860336,0.00019399273,0.00016462647,0.18517883,0.7997938,0.000008897322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022203187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0253522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022203187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015273092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056878137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11081457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387178972","doi":"10.1111/plar.12539","title":"Reflecting on/for better worlds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PoLAR Political and Legal Anthropology Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Library science; Citation; Sociology; History; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09395619505099222,"score_gpt":0.4585885141327816,"score_spread":0.3646323190817894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387178972","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046581745,0.0012556802,0.035067637,0.044383753,0.00081871025,0.00014650864,0.0001656668,0.00030895518,0.8712713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9075821,0.0010385684,0.013869288,0.005218997,0.00017850712,0.00016496493,0.00019106288,0.00040335493,0.07135323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99351996,0.0035556634,0.000157947,0.0009353254,0.0010157452,0.0008153573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973519,0.0007564595,0.00029289987,0.0007463037,0.0003019181,0.0005505607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047844746,0.00095492415,0.00045042523,0.0016505521,0.0107139405,0.015555757,0.0018856145,0.0043776142,0.030285694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069226953,0.0004088996,0.0007823823,0.0010593095,0.04878958,0.023725647,0.017807417,0.0080253715,0.0052223643],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019247087,0.00002255087,0.0005824444,0.000059645143,0.000009401839,0.00030820505,0.16418514,0.000110802976,0.0005047275,0.8060513,0.014850923,0.013295519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010061397,0.000025771697,0.0004936058,0.00022795537,0.000010791278,0.0004903541,0.17881063,0.00020534816,0.0004726042,0.19242474,0.62679166,0.00003642442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004827151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059662615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030285694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031447024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022105216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10131574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387271257","doi":"10.5040/9781509957415.ch-012","title":"Indigenous Oral History in Canadian Courts: The Law of Fact-finding and the Wrong Mistake","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Indigenous; Law; Political science; Biology","score_opus":0.02983279992853202,"score_gpt":0.2684648625713456,"score_spread":0.23863206264281359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387271257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056318905,0.008367831,0.0016427265,0.09048236,0.00065275066,0.000078073186,0.000447751,0.00008167974,0.8419279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8093228,0.004696932,0.0012687275,0.009449492,0.00035969118,0.00003948949,0.000098031946,0.00008739571,0.17467755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993292,0.001140688,0.00020047791,0.00061179354,0.0019972823,0.002757722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872758,0.005015002,0.0005202148,0.00064745755,0.005020766,0.0015207275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050455863,0.000490831,0.00047117955,0.0035568634,0.038528733,0.017706791,0.0033964706,0.009178234,0.025478913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027563935,0.0005323686,0.0003790729,0.0052226447,0.024654413,0.004925889,0.004526854,0.0078011416,0.0009816155],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020688016,0.000028680995,0.0025547873,0.00009272123,0.000009822754,0.0004971137,0.04172706,0.0002823533,0.00010390903,0.8524662,0.073065676,0.029150948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024209196,0.000018193028,0.015431428,0.00090743025,0.000077020646,0.00045434304,0.094040886,0.0012996728,0.0006227049,0.11911984,0.76782024,0.00018402805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9917378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111232534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.111232534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21627219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8070523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387341155","doi":"10.1017/als.2023.9","title":"Neocolonial Digitality: Analyzing Digital Legal Databases Using Legal Pluralism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"India Diabetes Research Foundation; York University; Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete; Social Science Research Council; ALS Association","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Colonialism; Law; Islam; Sociology; Legal research; Political science; Legal realism; Epistemology; Geography","score_opus":0.039455677286023505,"score_gpt":0.3298071606594894,"score_spread":0.2903514833734659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387341155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96068054,0.000493602,0.0033597217,0.0015712706,0.000014713778,0.00014444356,0.0004432017,0.000012085866,0.03328043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971541,0.00018928936,0.0018510377,0.000055075103,0.000007079648,0.00005169477,0.00017572126,0.000007101882,0.00050894124],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959967,0.0021019713,0.00034121357,0.0003566134,0.0008659225,0.00033755397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96671236,0.02347557,0.0041716467,0.0019688727,0.0029149659,0.0007567046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005462025,0.00014924521,0.0002810886,0.010015763,0.0028921198,0.009591053,0.00088591076,0.00061830104,0.004321784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029192558,0.00018299698,0.00019776062,0.019121408,0.006658134,0.010209512,0.006403424,0.0010684992,0.0002680851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012640675,0.00024734705,0.3215539,0.0005162065,0.00008234471,0.0016905523,0.28470933,0.0016652087,0.0005874389,0.2800502,0.0027337978,0.10603722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013847865,0.000052471947,0.15044586,0.00048332073,0.000041535815,0.0004931867,0.74190086,0.008406204,0.0006997441,0.04463558,0.052794885,0.00003252435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011223645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01570763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011223645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005055264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023092357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03667867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387489456","doi":"10.29173/cjs29793","title":"Chan, Wendy, Hiding in Plain Sight","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Sociology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Sight; Optics; Physics","score_opus":0.03290375412390018,"score_gpt":0.2874362948097159,"score_spread":0.2545325406858157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387489456","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011786378,0.89492804,0.0002404366,0.043260567,0.027272826,0.000021049467,0.0001740572,0.000046459118,0.03393878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018594129,0.76321805,0.00041624726,0.028770825,0.019618502,0.000056183017,0.0003395363,0.0001053939,0.18561587],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991806,0.00010395095,0.000039668193,0.00006778353,0.0005579171,0.000050047074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971445,0.000866884,0.0001246667,0.000079098165,0.0015599822,0.00022477917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011087761,0.00050330226,0.0010232754,0.0034777909,0.0009394546,0.003426758,0.0013427377,0.0024334663,0.04100513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068916674,0.00042935312,0.00035743768,0.004674817,0.0011650254,0.0032959213,0.0011299552,0.0029914733,0.021123374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039921797,0.00000429939,0.000023257959,0.0003394897,0.0000038623743,0.000021769007,0.000032678337,0.000017767312,0.000023545721,0.0017062533,0.9569536,0.04086963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027928372,0.0000030410824,0.00008141172,0.00045994885,0.000004437989,0.00007316417,0.000033891658,0.0000061396468,0.0000117337295,0.00069689617,0.9986235,0.00000301607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019533841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04290416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04100513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003033676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007618347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13717586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387571829","doi":"10.17803/2713-0533.2023.2.25.515-543","title":"The Communicative Function of Legal Transplants in Mixed Legal Systems","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Kutafin Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Empirical legal studies; Legal realism; Legal research; Legal formalism; Legal profession; Philosophy of law; Legal history; Legal culture; Legal psychology; Law; Political science; Legal opinion; Sociology; Comparative law; Black letter law; Private law","score_opus":0.04124633924652407,"score_gpt":0.3264456495354658,"score_spread":0.28519931028894174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387571829","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41464,0.005751924,0.10188488,0.023358611,0.00041643917,0.00013727548,0.00003727947,0.00017178134,0.45360187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99331653,0.00037590042,0.002851346,0.0003351674,0.000051717096,0.000029908619,0.000006275001,0.000017926723,0.0030151692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858354,0.0106197065,0.00030444033,0.00054817664,0.0020267174,0.00066548353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851677,0.011505694,0.0012634255,0.0008225187,0.0007158594,0.0005248813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007371521,0.00040545355,0.00042629646,0.0031130484,0.008263231,0.009924922,0.0014196418,0.0032020023,0.00350581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015201051,0.00030545052,0.0003111105,0.0020086458,0.046931762,0.011838034,0.009848033,0.0036813747,0.00028497973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016414082,0.000008687617,0.00051099685,0.000051492385,0.0000043516725,0.00029667988,0.10098046,0.00022293486,0.0004494365,0.8881414,0.00042936014,0.008887881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031608233,0.0001286267,0.0038343188,0.0008717619,0.000041497795,0.001516253,0.2483875,0.0063424776,0.0032913096,0.561409,0.17405774,0.00008792912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030649374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022713556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009924922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066263787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033661742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387667287","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0073","title":"Substantive Equality and Its Remedial Consequences","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Equity (law); Focus (optics); Social equality; Economic Justice; Gender equity; Contrast (vision); Sociology; Political science; Law and economics; Inequality; Law; Social science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03552002745116641,"score_gpt":0.28295883661936505,"score_spread":0.24743880916819863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387667287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02704688,0.014089648,0.20906238,0.24173345,0.0025256947,0.000091218164,0.00017863534,0.00024272635,0.5050294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93297577,0.002168629,0.029629523,0.01354084,0.00153455,0.00017304138,0.000060583676,0.00016549558,0.019751575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875448,0.006094681,0.00060958497,0.0020744982,0.0025324493,0.0011440449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98506063,0.010204481,0.0007109121,0.0023431869,0.0012769531,0.00040382176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015146249,0.0006236242,0.0007878371,0.0013421255,0.0058973245,0.008418763,0.0021935022,0.00766207,0.008823027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04120758,0.0004727742,0.00090492127,0.00095737964,0.05436838,0.01445118,0.0073396782,0.009691931,0.00096953113],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030577012,0.0000027315039,0.000053885084,0.0000066196303,0.0000020679263,0.000008207812,0.00017940842,0.00016646663,0.000012694541,0.9967032,0.000868717,0.0019928901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054288116,0.000004475365,0.00007562954,0.00002651335,0.0000022070565,0.000011698277,0.000087568056,0.0004065475,0.00006268248,0.99111205,0.008200207,0.0000049413397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006152922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061967946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015146249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053410567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08010203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387778034","doi":"10.1111/jols.12448","title":"<i>Applied Legal Pluralism: Processes, Driving Forces and Effects</i> By GhislainOtis, JeanLeClair, and SophieThériault, London: Routledge, 2022, 284 pp., £130.00","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Pluralism (philosophy); Citation; Law; Library science; Sociology; Art history; Political science; Art; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.007101160421346347,"score_gpt":0.2527671524261666,"score_spread":0.24566599200482026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387778034","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022400406,0.5740704,0.0036095094,0.2523977,0.006898633,0.00009149886,0.00018520297,0.00011818179,0.16038883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13488783,0.4976484,0.0066041495,0.040108368,0.016754247,0.0006131131,0.0006297956,0.00063894707,0.30211526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582005,0.0022554807,0.00012537639,0.00041036634,0.0010632994,0.00032546127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996104,0.0024577174,0.0004406818,0.00021830628,0.00046392914,0.0003153781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004600582,0.0012158985,0.00075817644,0.0022674503,0.004365463,0.014205629,0.0023697084,0.0046346164,0.016411612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065647503,0.0006747009,0.0006319107,0.0070290077,0.021893777,0.013956812,0.006709232,0.006802736,0.0046656122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018639694,0.000041658284,0.00039460554,0.0008444355,0.000013880434,0.00012782557,0.012483002,0.00018629004,0.00012029144,0.2887555,0.6275265,0.06948737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005879661,0.000009103584,0.0009235874,0.0015287019,0.0000035571527,0.00011716839,0.005707759,0.00025434312,0.000067599816,0.09981047,0.8915531,0.000018707757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02095013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029837424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02095013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009927894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00929544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07203227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388143845","doi":"10.1515/9781773853819","title":"Environment in the Courtroom, Volume II","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.02092625330012522,"score_gpt":0.20919458032706711,"score_spread":0.1882683270269419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388143845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007264873,0.00493352,0.00050831557,0.0060880855,0.0019604836,0.00001940141,0.00007890154,0.000046293055,0.98563856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009577349,0.0029039655,0.00025396392,0.0034825078,0.00049051497,0.000023390396,0.00012170248,0.00004617508,0.98310053],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992111,0.00011701137,0.000022061755,0.000079001125,0.00046311563,0.000107742366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995166,0.00014049918,0.000019843219,0.000031826043,0.00021332168,0.00007792025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000372209,0.0004057977,0.00025698415,0.0008658523,0.0052487142,0.0070217256,0.0007120598,0.0019012612,0.054833308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018057843,0.00024963872,0.00022881365,0.0010039394,0.0023585395,0.0030264377,0.0017044296,0.0023186211,0.014212803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063874354,0.00002598644,0.00013394348,0.000038345454,0.0000014883879,0.00013385384,0.0009275738,0.00018890823,0.0002058083,0.17350684,0.78712195,0.03770909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014716396,0.0000036608312,0.00023867236,0.00010489698,0.0000010748483,0.000055118056,0.0005664329,0.00008562397,0.000069689246,0.011735129,0.9871336,0.000004612994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045907527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084299974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054833308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005161599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006891954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18343568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388147236","doi":"10.1515/9781552389874","title":"Environment in the Courtroom","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.018118930843889505,"score_gpt":0.20422777354027968,"score_spread":0.18610884269639016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388147236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007508768,0.0034922077,0.0003847368,0.005490939,0.0009281619,0.00001480118,0.0000876861,0.00005198461,0.9887987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024734523,0.0033504206,0.00040192396,0.0033316682,0.00019979163,0.000012593089,0.00011139046,0.000054525113,0.9678031],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980837,0.00017080743,0.00003774759,0.00015870975,0.0011386748,0.0004104391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992009,0.00013327217,0.000019621331,0.000046715526,0.00043652448,0.00016291565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005470745,0.0004153702,0.0003656583,0.0015255641,0.0141301965,0.011140162,0.0015244583,0.002846386,0.062192973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024088006,0.00029343998,0.0003100667,0.0020255994,0.005097245,0.00264024,0.002756504,0.0026241639,0.011026396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052036344,0.0000109851035,0.0001618683,0.00004082419,0.0000019132772,0.0003036914,0.0025215505,0.00014165013,0.00020496442,0.2952272,0.65857863,0.04280154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.630028e-7,0.0000015142533,0.0003230469,0.00007516006,0.0000015254896,0.00005506662,0.0012251098,0.000045189216,0.000055178964,0.00816912,0.9900412,0.0000070022375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71092844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8498683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71092844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025438271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032819558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58154786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388171906","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780195154023.003.0002","title":"Why Culture Matters for Justice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal culture; Sociology; Vernacular culture; Argument (complex analysis); Dominant culture; Economic Justice; Popular culture; Identity (music); Aesthetics; Social science; Media studies; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.024920907691357543,"score_gpt":0.2894803787451602,"score_spread":0.2645594710538027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388171906","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03498201,0.0069522527,0.0031697208,0.25261953,0.001034803,0.000041256346,0.000083940984,0.000026695134,0.70108986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416393,0.003567344,0.00060374144,0.034871463,0.0005207215,0.00004436812,0.000031358726,0.000046691977,0.018674988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99031854,0.0048659877,0.00020415502,0.0008909482,0.0017248174,0.001995659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897714,0.005062426,0.00068008696,0.00074011233,0.0021176354,0.0016282822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069266264,0.0002661676,0.00046132127,0.0011749213,0.011922203,0.012599938,0.0013103667,0.004358695,0.011797379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018620102,0.00021143633,0.00035445733,0.0012163376,0.040552016,0.00885634,0.0060701584,0.0063695735,0.0011104896],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004814187,0.000010601332,0.00087681774,0.000024995463,0.000006480798,0.00007345875,0.005080806,0.000057850546,0.000028430086,0.979106,0.009570603,0.005159193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013931899,0.000018231009,0.0032634898,0.0006038061,0.000021685131,0.00015747131,0.024188908,0.00022414573,0.00018404871,0.7788404,0.19246142,0.000022505335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035102934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031914875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035102934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010399772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010462666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07545596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388185352","doi":"10.1080/2049677x.2023.2270394","title":"Truth and privilege: libel law in Massachusetts and Nova Scotia, 1820–1840","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Legal History","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Privilege (computing); Law; Nova (rocket); Political science; History; Archaeology; Engineering","score_opus":0.0653947702903892,"score_gpt":0.31671676800037285,"score_spread":0.25132199770998365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388185352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86863256,0.011633234,0.00017777158,0.028255781,0.0001996545,0.000034823996,0.0007800358,0.000014456042,0.09027168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95222336,0.0013747045,0.00008849731,0.0014732878,0.000058063088,0.00002757398,0.00012920541,0.0000070539886,0.04461823],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989925,0.0001560354,0.0000392189,0.00011694427,0.00016226352,0.00053306087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978543,0.00070495595,0.00041441573,0.00006377952,0.0004792889,0.00048321896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009100781,0.00014001151,0.00024596232,0.0018599789,0.011320828,0.00299923,0.0010616411,0.0019718327,0.004450936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052638077,0.00032117372,0.0001587662,0.0023745198,0.0059499126,0.0014938953,0.0032657725,0.0026002652,0.000419276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022955274,0.00010144301,0.10509585,0.00023501874,0.000052384334,0.004976801,0.49954373,0.0005416481,0.002030371,0.2787534,0.053552214,0.05488761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035462872,0.00008338676,0.5898348,0.00057510205,0.000040537583,0.00061063666,0.092422806,0.00029079913,0.00074490526,0.00724032,0.30803192,0.00008932182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9414226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05857742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04300686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019346189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31203806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388441160","doi":"10.1111/jols.12450","title":"<i>Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions</i>Edited by BennettCapers, SarahDeer, and CoreyRayburn Yung, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023, 306 pp., £39.99","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Sociology; Law; Library science; Media studies; Criminology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01859203575634746,"score_gpt":0.26376041457230975,"score_spread":0.2451683788159623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388441160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014623078,0.35429537,0.0031964618,0.09221193,0.055954747,0.000102407845,0.0012244493,0.00035805127,0.49119434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017328577,0.13420898,0.0027513888,0.016304094,0.011237861,0.00016271416,0.0011850053,0.00079624134,0.81602526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980281,0.0005738934,0.00008071446,0.00013397135,0.0010515532,0.00013188286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982815,0.0008789946,0.00012254925,0.00007460413,0.0005041769,0.00013820299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016145894,0.0011737847,0.0005632111,0.0016588444,0.0030985787,0.005581598,0.0010514361,0.0018687353,0.05569519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048249043,0.0007200265,0.00037480687,0.0025278027,0.0033489927,0.0042726323,0.0018234547,0.0042949077,0.024723131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006224927,0.000004578785,0.000029552106,0.00013505826,0.0000011535553,0.000033614524,0.0011301864,0.000024092942,0.00009062153,0.008850565,0.95260745,0.0370869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.288879e-7,0.0000017051137,0.00014038436,0.000209425,4.226825e-7,0.000028193213,0.0004161608,0.000010495513,0.000035914258,0.0015614204,0.9975909,0.00000417595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026532196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064727604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05569519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004496279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006135271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.186319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388579151","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4602339","title":"Ways of Explaining Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.028260763504567476,"score_gpt":0.2899821005583118,"score_spread":0.26172133705374434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388579151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018788815,0.0063246046,0.104103066,0.17850564,0.0020858431,0.00015589618,0.00046128884,0.00031168282,0.6892631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81551373,0.0032144974,0.030008646,0.018375011,0.0019912024,0.00074057427,0.0003455767,0.00046049544,0.12935033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370754,0.0042143245,0.0001755096,0.0007113012,0.0006695637,0.00052168703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919883,0.004896955,0.0004500406,0.0016748894,0.00063556206,0.0003541783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007344718,0.0012143338,0.0010332267,0.004883044,0.006818896,0.014950786,0.0025444333,0.009854405,0.024752008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013218375,0.0007955661,0.0013975798,0.0030116374,0.052967265,0.03038978,0.006846264,0.011706959,0.0028585286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.176263e-7,0.0000024631117,0.000028411832,0.000004437793,0.0000015080556,0.000004940076,0.0006803046,0.00003244566,0.0000047054946,0.99793684,0.0009043873,0.00039848793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032060705,0.0000013696869,0.00001898307,0.000016547523,0.000002277891,0.000008176835,0.0005654206,0.00010207043,0.000015571535,0.98713315,0.012130462,0.0000027729031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073236455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065454477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024752008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054964926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046088044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082803786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388714554","doi":"10.1017/9781108995825.005","title":"Manipulation by Design","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Opt-out; Power (physics); Internet privacy; Informed consent; Business; Computer security; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics; Medicine; Advertising","score_opus":0.05659363490729227,"score_gpt":0.23690122494091226,"score_spread":0.18030759003361999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388714554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038153774,0.007040747,0.19487943,0.015563155,0.0014205294,0.0006723115,0.00017973501,0.000564667,0.775864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34943393,0.012170217,0.18686624,0.018186823,0.0013430294,0.0043595424,0.00054950395,0.0014397167,0.42565098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746251,0.015225176,0.0010925983,0.0027555749,0.005415732,0.00088589883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816644,0.009159816,0.00081251183,0.0061769183,0.0018195367,0.00036690544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017481599,0.0014973112,0.00087520294,0.0023512992,0.0040341616,0.01144626,0.0028663543,0.0040916568,0.03315879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024767147,0.00076084817,0.0011011027,0.0017761396,0.021905234,0.012503535,0.008992127,0.004875383,0.0076633324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010676706,0.00001962687,0.0001213081,0.0001214829,0.000008748262,0.000033871915,0.0017297385,0.00021664149,0.0001988911,0.9687663,0.007915341,0.020857513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002335402,0.000047505993,0.000112567555,0.00052048377,0.00001935472,0.00020119823,0.00095132174,0.00062647933,0.00086949434,0.4593777,0.5372299,0.000020750645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012767208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012749188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03315879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063702255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005885846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110927165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388919535","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4203778","title":"Of Tactics, Illegal Occupation and the Boundaries of Legal Capability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Canadian Forces College","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer security; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Criminology; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.008696715869522795,"score_gpt":0.28083794735547496,"score_spread":0.27214123148595215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388919535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82024515,0.00077590876,0.0022734976,0.0025467172,0.00002273684,0.0000180786,0.000054781234,0.000006547117,0.17405652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994955,0.00003423258,0.00009971256,0.00002413463,0.000006248246,0.0000068193563,0.0000058467717,0.0000016091923,0.00032583709],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960877,0.0021368058,0.0002241667,0.0003745582,0.0006308515,0.0005458762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9650544,0.024083184,0.005141157,0.0016359261,0.0015047075,0.0025806664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039727245,0.00017006445,0.00031419762,0.0025807496,0.0031508505,0.008018409,0.00088502537,0.0017739006,0.007031258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025985753,0.00025515695,0.00021917379,0.0011965209,0.020074002,0.0073990906,0.005453401,0.0022103935,0.00024414482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002605205,0.00027099095,0.066654265,0.0000656829,0.000031288364,0.0003145424,0.05214892,0.0006679836,0.00070891075,0.8602739,0.00054592465,0.018057154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009365968,0.00014768416,0.14631365,0.00026728978,0.00004113795,0.0008629754,0.11204467,0.0022580477,0.0005609284,0.72718877,0.01016076,0.00006047014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031784547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028343578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008018409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012049715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021058025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0235219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389378111","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4624074","title":"Harm to Self-Identity: Reading Goffman to Reassess the Use of Surreptitious Recordings as Evidence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Reading (process); Harm; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Criminology; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.05880197438034165,"score_gpt":0.35537345235541523,"score_spread":0.2965714779750736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389378111","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043712663,0.013288224,0.0050753565,0.9543024,0.00574496,0.000023320901,0.000026154587,0.00004825682,0.017120013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2222352,0.0105512515,0.01168311,0.7230494,0.0111094415,0.00023277696,0.000034784847,0.00040239625,0.020701637],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96471965,0.024486475,0.0017486257,0.0030258032,0.0048096767,0.001209776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82379764,0.15428181,0.003143985,0.0065721245,0.010789339,0.0014150495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042085864,0.000831241,0.0013578953,0.0023920813,0.012026916,0.012352698,0.0055391057,0.044398364,0.0019582747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.154877,0.000852217,0.0007808231,0.0013605296,0.090062,0.038232163,0.00562707,0.058981955,0.00093028106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004905547,0.000025159961,0.0005995046,0.00033188652,0.000045304216,0.000871544,0.089941904,0.00015520505,0.0003354225,0.6773422,0.20180674,0.028495988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034243792,0.00004429469,0.0010194738,0.0032461963,0.00005762178,0.0011638775,0.04467926,0.000588547,0.0013772199,0.40167943,0.5459446,0.00016517838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027373252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03286722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044398364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072263367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009469048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.222574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389565699","doi":"10.3233/faia230965","title":"Using Large Language Models to Support Thematic Analysis in Empirical Legal Studies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Research Unit on Children's Psychosocial Maladjustment","funders":"","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Coding (social sciences); Thematic map; Computer science; Qualitative analysis; Empirical research; Qualitative research; Quality (philosophy); Data science; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.21101223290148677,"score_gpt":0.4261866455256179,"score_spread":0.21517441262413114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389565699","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005253054,0.00027878565,0.98546094,0.0015417536,0.00004911706,0.00056847883,0.00036473127,0.0005482081,0.0059349076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036085546,0.00016431796,0.9604302,0.00018789321,0.00002277895,0.0016134606,0.00047945377,0.00015333641,0.0008629419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9668455,0.0287301,0.0008996833,0.0012513167,0.002068277,0.00020509893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83048946,0.15670864,0.0025957024,0.0068933684,0.0027916892,0.00052112114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036330596,0.0011945149,0.0007776579,0.0049523613,0.0023245045,0.0069625364,0.0035485886,0.001444601,0.006795169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08536681,0.0010619796,0.0018857644,0.0057393466,0.0052450155,0.010364913,0.0063871616,0.0038642406,0.0015753951],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009651801,0.00018510643,0.0032856613,0.0015595129,0.00014996868,0.0003822192,0.036976337,0.042578693,0.0023039777,0.6366495,0.013945915,0.26188666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056618836,0.00004671105,0.0010265148,0.0008065683,0.000039941166,0.00022652588,0.007654777,0.21214533,0.001883929,0.7227117,0.053328443,0.00007295464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044771656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011094483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036330596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057739005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054246117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19213682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389977917","doi":"10.1080/0020174x.2023.2296470","title":"Crime and punishment; drama and meaning: lessons from <i>On the Genealogy of Morals</i> II","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Inquiry","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Meaning (existential); Drama; Criminology; Genealogy; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Philosophy; History; Political science; Literature; Social psychology; Epistemology; Art","score_opus":0.10119132897665443,"score_gpt":0.3555950512372948,"score_spread":0.25440372226064034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389977917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09340305,0.028297327,0.01828127,0.14870016,0.0015860117,0.000036007634,0.00009263577,0.00007824653,0.7095253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809472,0.004873282,0.001292196,0.0029473533,0.0004121022,0.000036837682,0.000021069778,0.000045661363,0.009424382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970884,0.0022356121,0.00003779748,0.000141311,0.00029026342,0.00020670454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997033,0.0021743032,0.000254876,0.0001978477,0.0001952803,0.00014479319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019939903,0.0003844379,0.00040303927,0.0013818324,0.0075903763,0.007914742,0.0013626192,0.0028982442,0.003935168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006179692,0.00020814769,0.00021618325,0.0014025404,0.05635806,0.0095148785,0.0049767103,0.005390595,0.0003838154],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006041451,0.000011506183,0.00025840997,0.00003764089,0.0000019270985,0.000072603165,0.023681825,0.00012909963,0.000026110782,0.96781856,0.0036197305,0.0043364847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012196422,0.000018827239,0.0011289316,0.00033064096,0.000005238762,0.00024108842,0.04220232,0.00045821586,0.00014321173,0.7771525,0.17828755,0.000019339022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056537394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075246664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007914742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004659414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028588427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033806562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389987941","doi":"10.7202/1108334ar","title":"Documentary Ethics, Para-Judicial Fantasies, and the Transgressive Desires of Lynn Crosbie’s Paul’s Case","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Canadian Literature","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Transgressive; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Psychology; Geology; Geomorphology","score_opus":0.07138014773823644,"score_gpt":0.4030362501539461,"score_spread":0.3316561024157097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389987941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054195374,0.009435747,0.0011994964,0.43469805,0.0006120326,0.000046729023,0.000053711272,0.00001097305,0.49974787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8781296,0.004884747,0.0007573895,0.044280704,0.00018784717,0.000058968086,0.000019035451,0.000032847238,0.07164899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98878723,0.0054034847,0.0002892925,0.0008473541,0.0024113287,0.0022613378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886501,0.0066367188,0.0009031758,0.0004673707,0.0019968117,0.0013458306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008737571,0.00025153335,0.00031866936,0.0007339389,0.028698104,0.010217071,0.0014818127,0.008794621,0.004688756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016801048,0.00043618568,0.00017800038,0.0012671677,0.04652021,0.0050374377,0.0041860705,0.010201776,0.00052853784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008616512,0.000011037831,0.0004535571,0.000029213514,0.0000026357686,0.000719837,0.07239241,0.000041755535,0.00013906027,0.87270373,0.049412448,0.0040856884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019058274,0.000012368242,0.002599364,0.00046029937,0.000010999347,0.00088195235,0.13220572,0.00014190102,0.00046740295,0.12471959,0.7383871,0.000094130555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5085314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7247071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4914686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026749523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032466512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98872596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390284016","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-45347-2_7","title":"Reading Dworkin Against Post-Liberal Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Liberalism; Solidarity; Economic Justice; Reading (process); Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.09180749652681337,"score_gpt":0.36058156502762356,"score_spread":0.2687740685008102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390284016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006530691,0.008430597,0.0019878203,0.07489442,0.0015380839,0.00003113677,0.00008499896,0.00002935503,0.90647286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2672424,0.0031389254,0.00096224295,0.03559763,0.00110262,0.00012033527,0.00004547822,0.00014186128,0.69164854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901843,0.00036958055,0.00002752721,0.00016453788,0.00020467307,0.00021522377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989537,0.0006713699,0.000050188588,0.00009599597,0.0001638289,0.00006490774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013870258,0.0004189506,0.00047770335,0.0009808103,0.008468511,0.0063405526,0.00080650277,0.0059857722,0.012610762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035856613,0.00029179483,0.00017000543,0.0012099636,0.018251382,0.007457367,0.002578736,0.010849032,0.002115326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037138313,0.0000048007414,0.000015190535,0.0000075765624,6.0363726e-7,0.000022471233,0.0021524685,0.000012789626,0.000017922499,0.96642935,0.029365495,0.0019675936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008539221,0.000005791475,0.00018227214,0.00013853316,0.0000022709028,0.00003999019,0.0025643515,0.000052825326,0.00014326174,0.48029876,0.5165536,0.000009845301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027598634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060693156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027598634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071032858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003856871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05487597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390284480","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-45347-2_1","title":"Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in classical liberalism","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Authoritarianism; Politics; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Democracy","score_opus":0.08751387141869393,"score_gpt":0.3552266546764717,"score_spread":0.26771278325777775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390284480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044925135,0.0012274402,0.0026393167,0.0052459408,0.0046688854,0.00016003234,0.004407989,0.0007076531,0.9804935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001970785,0.00083321915,0.0011974727,0.0020349321,0.0007336592,0.00013569901,0.0029137784,0.00026477667,0.9899156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989936,0.00014313126,0.00003528804,0.0002066276,0.0004965861,0.00012478311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985532,0.00021427669,0.000049496157,0.00020966459,0.0006767843,0.00029642606],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001094837,0.0007637314,0.00048384353,0.0017227386,0.0018676621,0.0049693016,0.0016894195,0.0019499358,0.68014234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038501262,0.00027054182,0.0005116779,0.0015861668,0.0007570307,0.0026443466,0.0028344253,0.0019100669,0.54387754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026755182,0.000030443685,0.00015524303,0.00011705972,0.0000020711539,0.000040453288,0.0001731592,0.00006482364,0.00017498176,0.03902035,0.86018777,0.10000682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018471726,0.000004384619,0.00009620365,0.000049145394,6.7169555e-7,0.0000163526,0.000060822502,0.000010788513,0.0000370769,0.0030527322,0.99666804,0.0000019415645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004447613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005793239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31985766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018092704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030056986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4562381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390600274","doi":"10.5380/rinc.v10i2.89148","title":"Constitutional Law Around the Globe: Fundamental Rights, the Freedom of Speech and “Hate Speech” in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Investigações Constitucionais","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Political science; Free speech; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.028766733335975576,"score_gpt":0.2664595713257438,"score_spread":0.23769283798976826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390600274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28738853,0.025763925,0.0026113985,0.07711914,0.00044988963,0.00008203571,0.0006663086,0.000040831903,0.60587794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97929525,0.005289084,0.0005598295,0.0018851239,0.000043264,0.00001584701,0.00009481429,0.000016981086,0.012799767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942602,0.00087162334,0.00010784421,0.00049605686,0.0021872385,0.0020770046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939797,0.00239243,0.0004090673,0.00022370789,0.0018569761,0.0011381102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035114167,0.00030056536,0.00051151257,0.0042580003,0.028495204,0.012997018,0.0016164352,0.0021071716,0.0055759526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010752694,0.00028974895,0.00035997885,0.009927781,0.032902393,0.0043999376,0.0038686616,0.00414908,0.00014827047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016231208,0.00001101527,0.0034633118,0.000059397014,0.000009664372,0.00015309424,0.032861106,0.0004694415,0.00013059675,0.94005775,0.0073991762,0.015369285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003122582,0.000029641084,0.0788205,0.0011102568,0.00008137585,0.00019391632,0.15202567,0.0026064536,0.00063835405,0.21614617,0.54804915,0.0002673283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99700004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99814093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20855422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20855422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24292128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91796494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390661320","doi":"10.17473/lawart-2023-4-9","title":"The Court of Arbitration for Art (CAfA). A Conversation with Bert Demarsin","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LawArt","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences; University of Victoria","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Political science; Art; Art history; Sociology; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.0177117930273036,"score_gpt":0.2863765335430273,"score_spread":0.2686647405157237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390661320","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036152147,0.05207446,0.0019489168,0.7086802,0.01767938,0.00007593288,0.0001812661,0.000074952106,0.21566975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26745042,0.015535766,0.0041723684,0.32113826,0.016087815,0.00025146396,0.00024688753,0.00034060405,0.3747764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.977505,0.0074166623,0.0010839838,0.002877166,0.0074824635,0.0036347625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842741,0.009248691,0.0009527158,0.0006733049,0.0030405172,0.0018106408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015299851,0.0004872346,0.0009012755,0.0014282403,0.019974584,0.023362713,0.0021908297,0.033117723,0.015614364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038340554,0.00077612104,0.000982729,0.0018431627,0.008106066,0.0079283565,0.005247922,0.018864188,0.0032149816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033946515,0.000017342252,0.000310885,0.000054333203,0.000013540117,0.0005390385,0.0017010255,0.00010763527,0.00024519095,0.33638725,0.6446085,0.01598137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009602089,0.0000057560064,0.00042081575,0.00012443218,0.000003698502,0.00020035017,0.00070693594,0.00013074961,0.00014410383,0.01794885,0.98027587,0.000028766397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06762237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07729334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06762237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016364502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015643584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13445753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390674898","doi":"10.17473/lawart-2023-4-4","title":"Unsettling Agreements: Law &amp; Art in The Witness Blanket, and in The Witness Blanket Stewardship Agreement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LawArt","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences; University of Victoria","keywords":"Laughter; Law; Moment (physics); Political science; History; Art; Literature; Physics","score_opus":0.04128279812977139,"score_gpt":0.31792577039821784,"score_spread":0.2766429722684465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390674898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12744753,0.005333827,0.029039886,0.0957626,0.0011177964,0.00012139462,0.000046045407,0.00011202118,0.74101895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95813334,0.00073290506,0.0022250838,0.003532562,0.0001568412,0.000063040694,0.000011747417,0.000074662334,0.03506981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98482263,0.009815628,0.00037295022,0.0013279226,0.001932175,0.0017286596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857481,0.010200584,0.000727477,0.0015163044,0.00077255856,0.0010349527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016125554,0.00040116863,0.00053471245,0.0017027047,0.037810408,0.027103646,0.002584234,0.010097605,0.009539123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024117444,0.00053091854,0.0005187431,0.0020820166,0.121192314,0.02059368,0.016598571,0.01181532,0.000728227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005974479,0.000010258486,0.00019023803,0.000017339442,0.000001824753,0.00031623023,0.117816836,0.00007538321,0.00008304293,0.875472,0.002066275,0.0039446275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010971515,0.000025243762,0.0005047019,0.00036941547,0.000008291834,0.00044795807,0.27488065,0.00052550517,0.00051802694,0.4768383,0.24583283,0.00003806583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030246759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032413527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037810408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011448958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012943668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08528113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390757981","doi":"10.1525/aft.2023.50.4.92","title":"Constitutionally Disruptive","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Afterimage","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Icon; Conversation; Citation; Afterimage; KISS (TNC); Queer; Art history; Media studies; Art; Visual arts; Computer science; Library science; Psychology; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Artificial intelligence; Communication","score_opus":0.022284522449793367,"score_gpt":0.33169735828819513,"score_spread":0.3094128358384018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390757981","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08947136,0.007567419,0.005464791,0.109521694,0.0014756856,0.00007386489,0.000061394676,0.00010589066,0.78625786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91922003,0.0011698824,0.00040916228,0.019450335,0.00029390215,0.00006267351,0.000017721832,0.000072284965,0.059304036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900371,0.004768686,0.000347135,0.0013569088,0.0015808445,0.001909259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642485,0.0013043769,0.00039053033,0.0006176736,0.0006530918,0.00060947635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005089346,0.00034927804,0.00034394683,0.0004958246,0.015414931,0.009535983,0.001445192,0.004331543,0.0053340346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010272776,0.00043213708,0.0001981139,0.00042575996,0.04385216,0.0060389577,0.00887943,0.0077616745,0.0010105299],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020183927,0.000017397211,0.0006504541,0.00003560652,0.0000055806595,0.00038065796,0.103807345,0.000049139202,0.00065015827,0.86824626,0.019119509,0.00701772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000077599325,0.000029507066,0.0009754401,0.00018075596,0.000009327846,0.0005173258,0.0893395,0.00007275478,0.00096907525,0.079158895,0.8287033,0.000036364607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037777744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043163028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037777744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011559174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007113244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08386809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390850602","doi":"10.4000/12h0b","title":"Sarah M. Miller (dir.), Documentary in Dispute. The Original Manuscript of Changing New York by Berenice Abbott and Elizabeth McCausland","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Art history; Art; Geology","score_opus":0.018459268675656573,"score_gpt":0.27473751355991005,"score_spread":0.2562782448842535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390850602","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011239898,0.13023095,0.0009608444,0.3752861,0.24612315,0.00015668558,0.0019867574,0.00027950676,0.243852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007256721,0.027358338,0.0006333537,0.023945505,0.01443069,0.00013838882,0.00081430393,0.00033527313,0.92508745],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826247,0.00031053709,0.00013762664,0.00036670803,0.0007703156,0.00015234869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723154,0.00063434476,0.00026921858,0.00015638728,0.0013412811,0.00036711642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018621305,0.00076411286,0.00056568935,0.0011583247,0.0057752035,0.0047062635,0.0011168614,0.003561035,0.14824934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071717394,0.0006362831,0.00036602767,0.0015369443,0.0019370533,0.004141899,0.002067124,0.0068831905,0.073001206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056931635,0.0000012818263,0.000029280376,0.00003059475,5.7515035e-7,0.000025889369,0.00015111272,0.0000020135633,0.000036449226,0.0009734269,0.993049,0.005694676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013331611,0.0000015789191,0.00021914014,0.000048117497,5.819075e-7,0.000040598712,0.0003185677,0.0000031266743,0.000030135838,0.00018574802,0.99914813,0.0000028648174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066322915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1266041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14824934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056966194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047491444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4959435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390925359","doi":"10.1515/9780776627922-007","title":"CHAPTER VII Online Civil Disobedience","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02565729572427692,"score_gpt":0.23002248767669872,"score_spread":0.2043651919524218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390925359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015034149,0.014110681,0.0030669486,0.009473984,0.0043302826,0.00012232909,0.0001731715,0.00018877028,0.9670304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042752497,0.043749012,0.002159124,0.0075946143,0.006442844,0.00026734098,0.0006002473,0.0004602827,0.89597404],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852556,0.00022324534,0.00005028237,0.0002051946,0.0007728249,0.00022308592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830025,0.00058559596,0.00011414184,0.00025517782,0.0005008585,0.00024391724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083401316,0.000671777,0.00038281834,0.0015388868,0.0030670858,0.008646794,0.001188721,0.0031579563,0.14026901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004393544,0.00040429315,0.00043701747,0.0014011246,0.0023837187,0.0072417804,0.0035835344,0.004584789,0.0439873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022858041,0.00010423533,0.0003621755,0.00053249905,0.0000059697836,0.00015552496,0.0014481536,0.0004350037,0.0004634876,0.40561563,0.4352405,0.15561393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019733704,0.000012224908,0.00027048873,0.0008854363,0.0000026435214,0.00010752538,0.00035963516,0.00008033258,0.00019934283,0.015414291,0.9826575,0.000008600763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042386376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004178657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14026901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040637488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00296708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46924657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390927564","doi":"10.1515/9780776624303-002","title":"Introduction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science","score_opus":0.018286308369470244,"score_gpt":0.21545556902222884,"score_spread":0.1971692606527586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390927564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020473476,0.0023207744,0.0065229223,0.010471819,0.0050217197,0.0003148468,0.0055709127,0.0013587568,0.96637094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01658427,0.0022112199,0.0048465966,0.005251755,0.0011151239,0.00029924922,0.0063549206,0.0006393159,0.9626975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738115,0.00044613038,0.00013445361,0.00069750403,0.0010270211,0.0003137119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769825,0.00037540952,0.00012469561,0.00041912662,0.00091673835,0.0004658475],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017754134,0.0009559605,0.00067296345,0.0018212178,0.0032326642,0.008890435,0.0029554204,0.0042751,0.53129846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058764033,0.00041344733,0.00086334324,0.0019638883,0.0013854066,0.005688722,0.0060297344,0.0032090063,0.3220945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082938044,0.00009618523,0.0009885965,0.0003220891,0.000009646159,0.00023074978,0.00080236344,0.00019674533,0.00044983043,0.10564924,0.72561795,0.16555358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004634577,0.00001405953,0.00030253959,0.00010959943,0.0000020714622,0.0000791704,0.00019543986,0.00006505632,0.00011086036,0.004102924,0.9950074,0.0000061855535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056744744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062363134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53129846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033884838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004735953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66854584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390943429","doi":"10.4324/9781003399360-10","title":"Indigenous Linguicide","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Geography; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.02334871849514157,"score_gpt":0.2934120811692637,"score_spread":0.2700633626741221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390943429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006889315,0.012687211,0.00039736813,0.0034824924,0.0009580801,0.000024910585,0.000026809139,0.000063412495,0.97547036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.106399454,0.020106496,0.0006518322,0.0031676493,0.00038630664,0.000030091804,0.000040157567,0.000082875784,0.869135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994306,0.00012297682,0.000014238059,0.000063371546,0.00022222531,0.00014649419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970907,0.00008346335,0.000025088313,0.000035024674,0.00009403674,0.000053273227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038095622,0.00039993072,0.00022799417,0.0008857829,0.008275757,0.003513104,0.0008086825,0.001388975,0.016198881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010465721,0.00018112824,0.00027444027,0.0007256745,0.00518687,0.0016336923,0.0028778187,0.002364147,0.0031943317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000087618655,0.000032029468,0.00083218125,0.0003121004,0.000005976954,0.0010906674,0.06405861,0.00010793764,0.0004405424,0.5545789,0.2529937,0.12553863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.753866e-7,0.000006750976,0.0005026329,0.00021729154,0.000004025452,0.00057562883,0.0073093646,0.0000359731,0.00015991696,0.0040409686,0.9871414,0.000005149722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09212409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18588594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09212409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060547637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008978833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18317574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390994919","doi":"10.51644/9781771125864","title":"Sporting Justice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0417733745293414,"score_gpt":0.33253641724436755,"score_spread":0.2907630427150262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390994919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002016584,0.019489368,0.00019888379,0.008021,0.0011705185,0.000021377698,0.00013088211,0.00002662203,0.9689247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037911247,0.0065162634,0.00013866305,0.002251388,0.00025329442,0.00001906118,0.00008232196,0.00004477616,0.952783],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949837,0.00006895462,0.000008280596,0.000047991125,0.00019735332,0.00017919733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997416,0.000027400125,0.000013919595,0.000018188093,0.000101305806,0.00009759679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024079526,0.0004401562,0.00019895799,0.0010638041,0.011482422,0.004706686,0.0006635209,0.0013599338,0.025697717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077698944,0.00021110295,0.00015424303,0.0013797448,0.0056784796,0.001680941,0.001797231,0.0017053109,0.0047552586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011538804,0.000012425933,0.00041449632,0.00006281487,0.0000026667628,0.00017664359,0.017927522,0.00004252736,0.00010268715,0.194386,0.7400647,0.046795994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.350033e-7,0.0000016746036,0.0005311969,0.00006552029,6.5420073e-7,0.000025621754,0.0016393529,0.0000062658464,0.000013491945,0.0028034896,0.9949103,0.0000018143894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62940425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.903039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62940425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01909314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017855486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74555653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391048917","doi":"10.53556/5wpn4y40","title":"Human Rights in Colombian Literature and Cultural Production: Embodied Enactments","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Estudios Colombianos","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Production (economics); Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.016040387661064744,"score_gpt":0.312329964999453,"score_spread":0.29628957733838823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391048917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21466665,0.024390288,0.0036416359,0.030097583,0.0003503989,0.000069168804,0.00020559109,0.000057473524,0.72652113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879034,0.0025403716,0.00070957147,0.0004675409,0.00007249759,0.000031126456,0.000028572502,0.000024108671,0.008222738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638927,0.0021011261,0.0001256045,0.00037201925,0.00050610054,0.00050592324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928973,0.0046708127,0.00064322824,0.00068207114,0.0007396257,0.00036693446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045176623,0.0005875724,0.00044636984,0.0046621277,0.009718971,0.016607042,0.0011862761,0.002171059,0.009312212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009974313,0.00025007228,0.00019510553,0.0043710996,0.032357603,0.009385175,0.005573317,0.0023821725,0.00029135478],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027647504,0.00003539324,0.002296402,0.00029961622,0.00000703681,0.00038225105,0.30619818,0.00013086131,0.00025612314,0.66033685,0.0033915744,0.026638042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021804195,0.000023356442,0.014723674,0.002122659,0.00003664028,0.00038347984,0.5220808,0.0004410531,0.0006087952,0.1076991,0.35180384,0.000054798387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07557331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09922009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07557331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018484775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009546477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15026689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391119464","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474483537.003.0009","title":"Conclusion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Pleasure; Colonialism; Ethnography; Art; Art history; Media studies; Face (sociological concept); Movie theater; History; Sociology; Anthropology; Psychology; Social science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.036969824375995226,"score_gpt":0.24602431914259879,"score_spread":0.20905449476660357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391119464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003128335,0.0026972848,0.004038508,0.08039032,0.008855306,0.000099311386,0.0006384887,0.00018594979,0.89996666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07864343,0.0032298386,0.0030514735,0.05563644,0.0022237934,0.0002102872,0.001080793,0.0003478774,0.8555761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810624,0.00038786346,0.000061620914,0.0004352822,0.00066192396,0.0003470695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978109,0.00048082642,0.00008462368,0.00022732027,0.0010327502,0.00036364738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022166343,0.00045721087,0.0002862214,0.0010223688,0.003399272,0.007638645,0.0015753305,0.0036301645,0.13936058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067010988,0.00017266703,0.00047308186,0.00086478336,0.0022393716,0.0051391576,0.0036094876,0.003191406,0.04418159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003472749,0.000029537305,0.00071492005,0.00019471555,0.000005335913,0.00026970368,0.0037050962,0.000100157355,0.00020834907,0.49597338,0.44444352,0.054320507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024404626,0.0000046360633,0.00029745683,0.00016323494,0.0000016756635,0.00007896041,0.0018185453,0.000031609852,0.00010918163,0.017576646,0.9799121,0.0000034863463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053443206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055892062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13936058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051828194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042012464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391210861","doi":"","title":"L'encyclopédie du crime au cinéma","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Art","score_opus":0.01865234573333942,"score_gpt":0.2456498266375674,"score_spread":0.22699748090422797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391210861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001261895,0.06303855,0.0017245946,0.006068767,0.007818009,0.000048191614,0.0005777831,0.00018555378,0.91927665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015258163,0.04379558,0.000901483,0.0015268142,0.0037519298,0.0001085694,0.0004997656,0.00044164414,0.933716],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993548,0.00024138954,0.000025603893,0.00006155283,0.00023178721,0.00008482811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990915,0.00046425985,0.00004474558,0.00007074139,0.00024290806,0.00008577279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055647513,0.0013528507,0.0007245098,0.005680071,0.0027806936,0.010114759,0.00072866573,0.0012929074,0.12288258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001819213,0.00043553757,0.0003438634,0.003963917,0.0021808178,0.0032965685,0.0018247954,0.0026130553,0.017125644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016837872,0.000026507882,0.000108031396,0.0003959484,0.000004406884,0.000068443376,0.0025714617,0.00009998639,0.0005402116,0.09906365,0.81919134,0.07791318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.740007e-7,0.0000029527225,0.0002144729,0.00012823273,0.000001541282,0.000050117094,0.000309417,0.00003087501,0.00005873235,0.0006744976,0.9985262,0.0000018724469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026145903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0312731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12288258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003660497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032624728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41108316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391263655","doi":"10.7202/1108911ar","title":"Expressive Freedom and Ethical Responsibility at Canadian Universities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical responsibility; Academic freedom; Political science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Public relations; Law; Engineering; Higher education","score_opus":0.06144812330093676,"score_gpt":0.3971080315799417,"score_spread":0.33565990827900494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391263655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19955601,0.011410661,0.004621946,0.09992062,0.0009028607,0.00008091003,0.0001059213,0.00008216474,0.68331885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96387976,0.002078531,0.000669621,0.0038311826,0.00008113708,0.000016172105,0.000019231868,0.00002897908,0.029395407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983328,0.0036531924,0.00032879625,0.0010844953,0.0055094366,0.0060960967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894806,0.0035577028,0.00079674425,0.00045540326,0.0026578095,0.0030517464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073904702,0.00048768063,0.0005244656,0.0024991657,0.06356474,0.014252413,0.0021267415,0.005235547,0.008076067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013669559,0.00050393207,0.0005426415,0.002819096,0.05241391,0.0050867847,0.0121102445,0.0072279447,0.00038307408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003841488,0.00002290504,0.003310383,0.00008982579,0.000010902895,0.0010697702,0.21140793,0.0004791678,0.00055935694,0.7395913,0.013830671,0.02958932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020457386,0.00002441033,0.014018233,0.0006264254,0.000025921845,0.0005017871,0.30342466,0.00063440425,0.00075150153,0.10343482,0.57632244,0.000215045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9804145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8072862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19271381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20876893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93633753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391310893","doi":"10.26443/law.v68i1.1191","title":"Five Linguistic Methods for Revitalizing Indigenous Laws","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.06066495592786393,"score_gpt":0.418206220004975,"score_spread":0.35754126407711107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391310893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045063224,0.012111983,0.29431805,0.06115874,0.0014858015,0.0009629524,0.00010293673,0.0012574666,0.58353883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.579999,0.007893121,0.32466736,0.0051479847,0.00038310245,0.0017235804,0.00010213,0.00059597794,0.07948776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98106444,0.013799119,0.0007099964,0.0009640611,0.0027102977,0.00075209973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879731,0.007812848,0.0008277404,0.0017052231,0.0012499782,0.00043108992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023845676,0.0010011394,0.0005709806,0.007505805,0.008675899,0.013015644,0.0038702402,0.0041768556,0.0068437224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018823158,0.00050678855,0.0011072109,0.0030306214,0.046393257,0.013843221,0.013169521,0.00559866,0.0010519811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012090213,0.000049092123,0.00038065176,0.00035377927,0.00001033477,0.00010872209,0.05259254,0.0002473688,0.00048278208,0.8931705,0.0020139224,0.050578255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004582896,0.00012420282,0.0011282442,0.0018975814,0.000054458178,0.00045256456,0.07968724,0.0019579795,0.0029995048,0.52351207,0.3880439,0.00009642109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006123457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014913781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023845676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0134496745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010687448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12610948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391343145","doi":"10.7202/1108957ar","title":"Dangerous Stories: Narrative Theory and Critique in a Post-Truth World","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Narrative Works","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Post truth; History; Narratology; Psychology; Epistemology; Literature; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy; Art; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.011479587364354499,"score_gpt":0.32834655880619407,"score_spread":0.31686697144183956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391343145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09025754,0.03437094,0.046937663,0.28191623,0.0038927842,0.00017245227,0.00018166695,0.00014778168,0.5421229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689266,0.006271029,0.00454643,0.005508179,0.0007931928,0.00018977388,0.000056488094,0.00013881293,0.013569541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98025334,0.016928593,0.0002640363,0.00072452176,0.0011577649,0.00067170075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96395355,0.030091036,0.0016536514,0.001569778,0.0015870163,0.0011449141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019953825,0.0013535151,0.0007331207,0.006577026,0.020844832,0.024708068,0.0035515353,0.010220302,0.0042442484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025610624,0.00063690497,0.00068800786,0.0041905353,0.1252404,0.035089668,0.008832394,0.0088122375,0.00050426525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005585039,0.0000060536745,0.0000909879,0.000037678547,0.0000031829484,0.00013628337,0.10702612,0.000083226245,0.000016757074,0.88832307,0.0025446957,0.0017263276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001383909,0.000014102973,0.00015905418,0.000624438,0.000008797466,0.00020174171,0.18455686,0.0005688235,0.0001683069,0.6483126,0.16535527,0.00001616658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00752059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006396789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024708068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014908632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065971864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10817021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391394268","doi":"10.1515/9781782043461-017","title":"12 Scandals in Toronto: Kaluza’s Law and Transliteration Errors","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Boydell and Brewer eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transliteration; Law; Natural language processing; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.016214302732173655,"score_gpt":0.2605625713997345,"score_spread":0.24434826866756082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391394268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02518358,0.009576298,0.0030664678,0.113222554,0.0022183864,0.00004240202,0.00039404427,0.00023760588,0.8460587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68460196,0.003493726,0.0014149455,0.008408228,0.0009953647,0.00006571525,0.00015730299,0.0004013197,0.3004615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946833,0.0016621794,0.0002514062,0.00079382467,0.0011279834,0.0014812815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993662,0.003235175,0.0005490002,0.0007339233,0.001376084,0.00044379735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002968779,0.0007300402,0.0005107849,0.0024797914,0.021449357,0.011575895,0.0019398615,0.0075168577,0.027360292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01632686,0.0007499926,0.0004076516,0.0040284926,0.023251366,0.007499755,0.00540183,0.0076072337,0.0031244934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019455629,0.000004919139,0.0004799545,0.000065900764,0.0000055597325,0.00057089416,0.0888678,0.00012519478,0.0000663478,0.75336236,0.14389795,0.012533611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001733894,0.000009098614,0.0031078083,0.0004354943,0.00002442847,0.00033959796,0.043762658,0.0003685412,0.00042384784,0.07645895,0.87497914,0.00007305983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7076348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77849454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2923652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043365147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022667557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.588174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391600469","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1441","title":"Open Courts, Privacy and Equality in a Digital Era: The Supreme Court of Canada’s 2021 Open Court Jurisprudence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal; CBC (Canada); University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Roberts Court; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.05767073297775256,"score_gpt":0.3553411341393194,"score_spread":0.29767040116156684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391600469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13488644,0.014156106,0.006285965,0.39658162,0.0009184833,0.00011065302,0.00047673014,0.00007291941,0.44651118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89187783,0.0036956496,0.0024630288,0.046752114,0.00026795772,0.000052818825,0.00012831629,0.000040998813,0.054721266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98280716,0.0018329549,0.0002650493,0.0012875705,0.009008833,0.0047983686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897714,0.004482688,0.00036412707,0.00042874797,0.002820946,0.0021321427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006944868,0.00042508316,0.00045368233,0.002162649,0.039405532,0.024665,0.0029277657,0.009258582,0.0040667993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014485304,0.0005136874,0.00059697794,0.0030946264,0.039100915,0.0056916196,0.0066846013,0.011495766,0.00029480868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009221445,0.0000110341925,0.001103261,0.000018602123,0.0000060267457,0.00022317536,0.0102283405,0.0003450136,0.00011424366,0.96484715,0.015621639,0.0074723023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005419089,0.00002336365,0.01094874,0.0007130901,0.0000648679,0.00021892396,0.034177706,0.002910927,0.00068197824,0.2879657,0.66200835,0.00023224817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9890588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19374517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19374517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25241777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9351413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391603047","doi":"10.15290/eejtr.2023.07.01.13","title":"Discovering the Best Criminology Program in Poland: Contemplation of the Month-long Sabbatical at the University of Białystok","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Contemplation; Friendship; Closing (real estate); Criminology; Economic Justice; Quarter (Canadian coin); Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminal justice; Social science; History; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05340696015532463,"score_gpt":0.28159255574987185,"score_spread":0.2281855955945472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391603047","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07451536,0.015030115,0.003696125,0.8746705,0.025713079,0.00023723095,0.000060427552,0.00013466485,0.0059424452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7145201,0.0193794,0.020493688,0.20108995,0.008116324,0.00077892566,0.00012683729,0.00041247508,0.035082348],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879497,0.0055218134,0.0004303539,0.0011318151,0.0016377389,0.003328565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9628143,0.0015127262,0.0014744739,0.00054631784,0.0027963417,0.030855995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019388407,0.0008689475,0.0011504025,0.0012176023,0.021713853,0.013475532,0.0024849381,0.0061784266,0.003040089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018354503,0.00072137814,0.00071985775,0.0006562615,0.012099821,0.009354595,0.020739948,0.017903991,0.0015168829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008484129,0.0019769375,0.016463352,0.0019122928,0.00019645173,0.0064477776,0.17069557,0.0011225689,0.009173003,0.077152036,0.5439289,0.17008264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000840253,0.000645926,0.0144709265,0.0018092773,0.00003462661,0.0015467313,0.17505534,0.0007286414,0.0018464108,0.021653585,0.78194606,0.00017848873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039634597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009839788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021713853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008946999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033396658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10253692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391758976","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4694250","title":"The Legal Realists on Law and Literature","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.005057411239049475,"score_gpt":0.27408669276024106,"score_spread":0.2690292815211916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391758976","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01541026,0.020870356,0.0020199323,0.685655,0.0034299458,0.000017490127,0.00012936292,0.000045407793,0.27242216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84344405,0.015032063,0.0016263428,0.07088018,0.012246099,0.00014087453,0.00009691209,0.00016725356,0.05636605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98662263,0.009044475,0.00043179133,0.001007291,0.0019174326,0.000976381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96149915,0.029061781,0.0017474266,0.0024135367,0.0025033008,0.002774888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01353611,0.00062484446,0.0011890637,0.007977599,0.014853961,0.024202228,0.0015970492,0.01823506,0.0153722465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031570606,0.0006999539,0.00044575497,0.006762076,0.110769756,0.03285583,0.010399301,0.017836278,0.0019424702],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050015756,0.0000066789225,0.000103564176,0.000012225912,0.000001653165,0.00001925959,0.0037289113,0.000014977699,0.0000131941215,0.98652434,0.00818608,0.0013840443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014458267,0.000008213636,0.00024104721,0.0001591952,0.0000033484446,0.0000382192,0.007825669,0.00006814674,0.000030455054,0.8943424,0.09725721,0.000011732985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008511247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01178857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024202228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008703408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008514067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07158667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391847862","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.111968","title":"Towards a forensic semiotics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forensic Science International","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; International Centre for Comparative Criminology","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Forensic science; History; Linguistics; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.023968108095858337,"score_gpt":0.33853463319882027,"score_spread":0.3145665251029619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391847862","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00848644,0.018303696,0.58552116,0.113505654,0.0036122652,0.00030936304,0.00028405036,0.00042151043,0.26955584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4854915,0.016335808,0.44875976,0.013309273,0.0028852962,0.0011649922,0.0005903127,0.0004994415,0.030963544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775195,0.017234804,0.0011077985,0.0012279111,0.0024406146,0.00046929473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98074615,0.011414407,0.0010716544,0.0025728932,0.0031307118,0.0010642465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021773849,0.0013798422,0.0013230093,0.0063535837,0.006883478,0.018696103,0.0024292436,0.00672433,0.0035059247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017574651,0.0008782884,0.0013605534,0.0025653022,0.05473513,0.017490545,0.008758199,0.010678312,0.001913059],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000228206,0.0000035553487,0.000025759897,0.000025615973,0.0000012197758,0.00001959545,0.001468419,0.000107643405,0.000037949296,0.99597675,0.00074135565,0.0015898093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032974426,0.00000569935,0.000031574058,0.00013152194,0.0000014303556,0.00006530285,0.0014525853,0.0005643797,0.000068427595,0.94061863,0.05705009,0.0000070839515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026903448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012036521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021773849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066677975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071950923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11515248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391864579","doi":"10.51644/9781554581313-011","title":"“We dont want Kiser to rool in Ontario”","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; History","score_opus":0.03348157521946586,"score_gpt":0.259376257338843,"score_spread":0.22589468211937713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391864579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023066057,0.0036818138,0.0006028792,0.12314456,0.0025678198,0.000068058915,0.00028091378,0.000083991225,0.846504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04713292,0.00090023153,0.00021432483,0.010276571,0.000059952225,0.000022513406,0.000043291562,0.00005437835,0.9412958],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983884,0.0001600818,0.000027541588,0.00015651615,0.0003757568,0.00089180603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999084,0.00007846013,0.000040408464,0.000032060063,0.00034013728,0.00042496406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008255363,0.00041493512,0.0003460287,0.0006964513,0.04527409,0.005982425,0.0010933486,0.0049168966,0.034352455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018119644,0.0005171615,0.00043238062,0.0012637026,0.008466541,0.0041397023,0.0031603333,0.0064940657,0.0045068073],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048359852,0.000022146709,0.004044999,0.000095631956,0.000010483627,0.0009470441,0.06976918,0.000105091676,0.00040107046,0.22244912,0.67352784,0.028579114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027312453,0.0000060083426,0.002312541,0.00006209235,0.000004230091,0.00008234754,0.025466135,0.000022634025,0.000067670095,0.0021254844,0.9698307,0.000017335318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9717586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054500688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054500688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07946137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.395432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392479275","doi":"10.56326/jlle.v3i1.2838","title":"Moral Values in the Movie Script The Breadwinner (2017) by Anita Doron","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Humaniora Journal of Linguistics Literature and Education","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.03081124669084059,"score_gpt":0.33126427859543006,"score_spread":0.3004530319045895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392479275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8772394,0.0040878835,0.002046773,0.013629515,0.0010839595,0.00006329843,0.00015194906,0.00005412612,0.10164316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98120934,0.0007025656,0.0007684479,0.00066227856,0.000054402193,0.000021259533,0.000040203966,0.000029528184,0.01651201],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898213,0.0007116137,0.00002054648,0.00007620785,0.00012379397,0.00008558087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989182,0.00037619038,0.00010965403,0.0000567537,0.00024524482,0.00029401665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001055104,0.00029902876,0.0001802214,0.00024476336,0.005079073,0.0027713873,0.00025206123,0.00057294645,0.0026772448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028048295,0.00012318626,0.000102752514,0.00023768558,0.004202533,0.0014010279,0.0014095065,0.0012750584,0.00020932789],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027036172,0.00011389283,0.0196947,0.00029306766,0.000032167467,0.002458087,0.7165965,0.0003250183,0.0056581576,0.11254692,0.07864223,0.063368924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022618455,0.00018002206,0.046133876,0.00029431703,0.000021145806,0.001203429,0.3858281,0.0006091369,0.0021980552,0.00658408,0.55680984,0.00011537927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02435384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058229875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02435384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003341217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013546358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048424125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392581948","doi":"10.1093/icon/moae012","title":"The consensus-clarifying role of deliberative mini-publics in constitutional amendment: A reply to Oran Doyle and Rachael Walsh","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Political science; Publics; Law; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.018387664899195546,"score_gpt":0.32427968092069964,"score_spread":0.3058920160215041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392581948","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007384062,0.0023614096,0.0011081444,0.990473,0.0018506638,0.000006430618,0.000008416626,0.000012901068,0.0034406064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13186471,0.0044103255,0.0037107882,0.8411189,0.011420357,0.00015750775,0.000019772058,0.00014417434,0.0071534305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9167178,0.05803336,0.0028834331,0.008888379,0.009542852,0.0039342083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74089795,0.22679245,0.0056894766,0.008944455,0.013047409,0.004628232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10039642,0.00093421503,0.002047441,0.0017924664,0.013791304,0.016582388,0.008503356,0.06218455,0.0063807312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16129933,0.0011318194,0.0021964305,0.001847841,0.09676817,0.04270773,0.013293107,0.07888426,0.0024260588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007058839,0.000034238543,0.00019465186,0.0001931308,0.000017393446,0.0003435941,0.011223786,0.00034824153,0.00007785388,0.84426713,0.13660352,0.0066258237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011126429,0.00004342404,0.00024363327,0.0007502977,0.000014690661,0.00019395066,0.0099981995,0.0008118055,0.0003612965,0.6465526,0.3407663,0.00015250639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010454099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007935378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10039642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016662415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0154254725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53095335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392776925","doi":"10.61490/eial.v34i1.1798","title":"DAVID S. PARKER, The Pen, the Sword, and the Law: Dueling and Democracy in Uruguay. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2022.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EIAL - Estudios Interdisciplinarios de América Latina y el Caribe","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"SWORD; Queen (butterfly); Democracy; Law; Art; Political science; Media studies; History; Art history; Sociology; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.011846010140843065,"score_gpt":0.2741335861112928,"score_spread":0.2622875759704497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392776925","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008971603,0.90032625,0.0004671795,0.08430689,0.0030490726,0.000020621163,0.00026804613,0.000041321236,0.01062352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08069529,0.80094486,0.0019940285,0.019650012,0.004535026,0.00017238612,0.0003464319,0.00019965964,0.09146243],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978326,0.0011907276,0.00018407899,0.00017837499,0.00037977882,0.00023439706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967854,0.0014091957,0.0003582665,0.0001164429,0.000864106,0.00046663723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032562653,0.0022374422,0.0014259347,0.0030084823,0.009437319,0.005117037,0.002629656,0.007354503,0.0123483995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053867977,0.0017749555,0.00065466884,0.005082173,0.0058378847,0.010818439,0.0026280007,0.0064167017,0.0024029375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008045838,0.000045637564,0.0020149366,0.0007292692,0.000036334397,0.00032738276,0.011520226,0.0001461082,0.00011587777,0.04324009,0.89751846,0.04422519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002766856,0.000028422766,0.012747339,0.002097154,0.000048902297,0.00031555138,0.013816166,0.00016474334,0.00027828783,0.015531029,0.9548856,0.000059151702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42333525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6950345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42333525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010904194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013398162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84174234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392785425","doi":"10.1177/23996544241231688","title":"Grounding legal geography: Conversations on law, space, and power across disparate geographies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning C Politics and Space","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Geography; Power (physics); Economic geography; Law; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Physics","score_opus":0.011835460335935608,"score_gpt":0.27362298540614033,"score_spread":0.2617875250702047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392785425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41288987,0.025773948,0.010523605,0.2524525,0.0009731095,0.00004508481,0.000106873544,0.00008410413,0.29715097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99356115,0.0019026008,0.00041163852,0.0016333738,0.000075936405,0.000013575091,0.000009945502,0.000023298215,0.0023685507],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874576,0.009586798,0.00024032647,0.0005970555,0.00095851516,0.0011596989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860481,0.011390786,0.0007612023,0.00041133395,0.0005305999,0.00085788895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009198377,0.00039014593,0.00071858906,0.0038521234,0.022498354,0.02331301,0.0014056874,0.0046406346,0.0056068082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016841503,0.00040931124,0.00022452122,0.0049377345,0.06492606,0.022668434,0.011694591,0.0060972213,0.000265558],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010891773,0.0000060333,0.0008084311,0.000051589588,0.000002464111,0.00031553983,0.6560336,0.000072047944,0.00010395306,0.3333075,0.0021470666,0.007140918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000508128,0.000008684391,0.0013753801,0.00028438398,0.000004393231,0.00012576477,0.85825497,0.0001640773,0.0000825989,0.04369368,0.09598254,0.000018424787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06830098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07446452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06830098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020872187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006966256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15143907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392814999","doi":"10.29173/jaed173","title":"Book Reviews of David W. Elliott, Law and Aboriginal Peoples in Canada, 4th edition","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aboriginal Economic Development","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; History; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.011021921887889892,"score_gpt":0.2640233515691028,"score_spread":0.25300142968121286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392814999","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008923069,0.7160387,0.00071349123,0.04069767,0.0156025635,0.00009594265,0.0013904957,0.0002244951,0.22434434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006948109,0.40457094,0.0010979134,0.012892569,0.0043365485,0.00007853965,0.0010256238,0.0001599711,0.5688898],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994149,0.000038619746,0.00002047052,0.000043235697,0.00041048712,0.00007235784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876946,0.00018469992,0.00004722592,0.00002276933,0.00084010855,0.00013561295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052951986,0.0010801166,0.00081391126,0.0039317734,0.0046995943,0.0034569437,0.0012231953,0.0013063363,0.03532235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020221246,0.00037084063,0.00034301195,0.0079991985,0.0017282605,0.0020747099,0.0008499649,0.0016928778,0.010039854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003073862,0.0000055519113,0.00006229791,0.00015989764,0.0000015253217,0.00002702937,0.0003157835,0.00006529612,0.00004327853,0.0032403262,0.97674906,0.019326866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012667074,0.0000019652948,0.00074783125,0.00028401395,0.0000022076667,0.000035744702,0.00026051726,0.000017277855,0.000013356257,0.00074419676,0.99788564,0.000005915589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78490746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92408365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21509254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017491551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032909367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43271852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392969290","doi":"","title":"Étude comparée de la police du cinéma (France, Belgique, Grande-Bretagne, Canada et Australie)","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exhibition; Authorization; Law; Political science; Media studies; Visual arts; History; Art; Sociology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.010632935691288928,"score_gpt":0.25283985502463585,"score_spread":0.24220691933334693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392969290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87970024,0.010406664,0.0022465074,0.0016577523,0.0002109711,0.00021192392,0.00650714,0.00011581451,0.098942816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9663754,0.0032316141,0.0017205533,0.00022100411,0.00007162927,0.00010637774,0.0021642519,0.00007428247,0.026034877],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963928,0.0008890038,0.00011803478,0.0004359672,0.0012106562,0.0009536172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954144,0.0013094139,0.0007491982,0.00012225227,0.002016431,0.00038831952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018907504,0.0005554032,0.00058105594,0.0077206376,0.003588716,0.0052113333,0.0005707888,0.0007033994,0.009657389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007362494,0.00041619604,0.0005024222,0.009639586,0.0021573429,0.0016558897,0.0011122185,0.0010480179,0.000849705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009252527,0.00038535855,0.33711848,0.0017421672,0.0006671989,0.003209241,0.2221214,0.0035345817,0.00656886,0.06711528,0.038229525,0.31838268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019802019,0.000075926415,0.7222338,0.0004340193,0.000052805884,0.000670782,0.07174731,0.0007925489,0.00076264417,0.00038880983,0.20276602,0.000055587483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8590541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8821526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14094591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019947685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011674779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28355187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393020093","doi":"10.7202/1105956ar","title":"“Other Materials” — Traitorous Love and Decolonizing the Canadian Guide to Uniform Legal Citation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02054674410615965,"score_gpt":0.31129869600413085,"score_spread":0.2907519518979712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393020093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001242487,0.10407944,0.009467865,0.16991003,0.009527142,0.0008830986,0.007715399,0.0010775002,0.696097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03809285,0.104217805,0.028600601,0.08616542,0.0027678781,0.0014231697,0.005247859,0.001156083,0.7323284],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95891327,0.0036128326,0.0031245684,0.0017788236,0.028953733,0.0036168075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9391179,0.009306323,0.0014478004,0.0026295981,0.045426868,0.0020715648],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015274463,0.0014396666,0.0012354107,0.011627452,0.018183954,0.0134449545,0.0066651357,0.0111703435,0.0318859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049327403,0.0019398752,0.0012672197,0.013607396,0.014974063,0.0071818237,0.003880379,0.007895592,0.013891846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000667546,0.000011048934,0.00017779434,0.00020881493,0.0000039543283,0.000027981365,0.0008733972,0.000098687065,0.00007729647,0.10959375,0.866413,0.022507716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056761705,0.0000035841074,0.00088100997,0.0004447515,0.0000074044565,0.000032926728,0.00036253393,0.000082525476,0.00009928637,0.0073779393,0.99066204,0.000040413408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9753121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9860074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98655504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09147215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27059332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66367996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393326777","doi":"10.26522/tg.v8i.4194","title":"Media and Majesty","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"the general brock university Undergraduate journal of history","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Art; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.024631521162549026,"score_gpt":0.22862546379511833,"score_spread":0.20399394263256931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393326777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01345273,0.038081806,0.0003819173,0.064402655,0.0019805052,0.000013437067,0.00015715719,0.000055144745,0.8814746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4936282,0.025926653,0.00040044572,0.013762701,0.002497807,0.0000313363,0.00012507677,0.000099712095,0.46352798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987029,0.0004898953,0.00003870229,0.00012376586,0.0003897964,0.0002549958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980909,0.000860976,0.00019055372,0.00012624655,0.00033616534,0.00039505385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009387415,0.00025070133,0.00018653266,0.0015297019,0.006218333,0.009288338,0.00040600705,0.0017973507,0.030896006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036788725,0.00018878358,0.00013026848,0.0014335574,0.00827062,0.0038015496,0.002686535,0.0021293538,0.0031121003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006552264,0.000023695922,0.0018173902,0.00020806874,0.000010118719,0.00034477678,0.018519303,0.000059488593,0.0003940363,0.75608027,0.15839474,0.064082555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038071273,0.000010203298,0.0017797676,0.00019162655,0.000003168467,0.0001566542,0.0035889244,0.000016992242,0.00009721846,0.009031672,0.9851128,0.0000071976383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040705167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05212732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040705167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005578012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031220631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103357434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393971316","doi":"10.7202/1104267ar","title":"Law’s Documents: Authority, Materiality, Aesthetics. Katherine Biber, Trish Luker, Priya Vaughan, eds. London and New York: Routledge, 2022. xii, 375 pp. 9781003247593. EPUB","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archivaria","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Materiality (auditing); Art; Sociology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.03221854168410615,"score_gpt":0.3046004775417468,"score_spread":0.27238193585764064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393971316","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000715515,0.7516508,0.0018815692,0.037399,0.0050170943,0.00004873702,0.0007646675,0.00020606023,0.20231651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023069823,0.5400365,0.003797345,0.006007301,0.004491206,0.0002220658,0.0012704104,0.0005767534,0.42052856],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977799,0.00072233065,0.00019254253,0.00017370134,0.0010013042,0.00013027283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967045,0.0018341457,0.00037430934,0.00026469026,0.00062300084,0.0001994811],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022554637,0.0012546906,0.001136143,0.004812328,0.0024583745,0.011009219,0.0012413664,0.0037630012,0.06546382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073757023,0.0010541104,0.00048274663,0.007850884,0.006520917,0.012181756,0.002493458,0.0038519676,0.0289359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019603911,0.000015952724,0.00012414005,0.0008215056,0.000007928298,0.00009305545,0.002751602,0.00008649783,0.000158138,0.058295462,0.7573918,0.18023434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040656546,0.000005553123,0.0004491242,0.0016384199,0.0000027586307,0.00014270945,0.0013887356,0.00002768679,0.00006580076,0.015168457,0.98109835,0.000008346072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016865948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029736303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058729034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065228264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21899825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394688929","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12890","title":"AbdiAidid and BenjaminAlarie, The Legal Singularity: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Law Radically Better, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2023, 218 pp, hb £31.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Singularity; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.027821035302239748,"score_gpt":0.2758808243345855,"score_spread":0.24805978903234574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394688929","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002193895,0.9133088,0.00066881726,0.04931373,0.002798513,0.000014458498,0.00022013352,0.000053473676,0.033402618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0071288384,0.91000557,0.0011666707,0.007573993,0.0028605154,0.00003406622,0.00033688013,0.000073136325,0.070820294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853134,0.00031454192,0.00010545363,0.00009761725,0.00083832414,0.00011269932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971391,0.001587701,0.00020414549,0.00008253354,0.0007522763,0.00023426834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019721414,0.0010982581,0.00086078746,0.002310261,0.0024258834,0.007435942,0.0013901057,0.0038452768,0.02771788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052824365,0.0011675796,0.00050193013,0.005048213,0.0034992595,0.0067756083,0.0012322465,0.0042576487,0.011183229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022106033,0.000010341817,0.00021616438,0.0006957256,0.000014632169,0.00007614761,0.0009730849,0.00009926549,0.00008015836,0.028905407,0.921853,0.04705389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007188241,0.0000044187177,0.0009476953,0.00063367566,0.0000104032215,0.00008422676,0.0006548671,0.000049325412,0.000051185063,0.010307405,0.98723745,0.000012190374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0963776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26294047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0963776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006420904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009737616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19163328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394855317","doi":"10.4324/9781003087496-9","title":"The Predicament of Expertise in the Revival of Indigenous Legal Traditions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.027201760487057365,"score_gpt":0.2872785658198672,"score_spread":0.26007680533280986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394855317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03121963,0.0107638575,0.0032083592,0.045117468,0.000471406,0.000023154718,0.000010888318,0.000037767277,0.90914744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8212325,0.0062301704,0.0019035334,0.0074454634,0.00052055565,0.000042261927,0.000015460193,0.00007337333,0.16253673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962984,0.001949108,0.00006321675,0.00026898,0.00089966116,0.00052069733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952195,0.0034045784,0.00016745907,0.00032628686,0.0004667483,0.0004154155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005139187,0.00028336365,0.0002875704,0.0016893037,0.009239488,0.010187491,0.0016273351,0.0031108593,0.004002585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005945909,0.00020256874,0.00018351666,0.0013303738,0.063698225,0.009207491,0.007176906,0.0056021763,0.00047118627],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021809813,0.000005828171,0.00010082665,0.000035710662,0.0000014668035,0.00016980756,0.099333994,0.0000841652,0.00007480733,0.8869735,0.00504821,0.008169482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005963573,0.000013872813,0.0007082857,0.0005404704,0.0000041670824,0.00029886066,0.077198386,0.0002848905,0.00027696136,0.37097973,0.5496714,0.000016999787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056248173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09929717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056248173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014936264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013386802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11184156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394888011","doi":"10.1515/9782763744681-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canada Council for the Arts; Université Laval","keywords":"Front (military); Physics; Meteorology","score_opus":0.02028808751534378,"score_gpt":0.29051669785305506,"score_spread":0.2702286103377113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394888011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037724746,0.0019704008,0.00027482855,0.0051031746,0.003246808,0.000040362385,0.0011979121,0.0003378267,0.9874515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017312822,0.0009892063,0.00014709255,0.0014054147,0.00046369643,0.000018934732,0.0005579821,0.00012553675,0.9945609],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992255,0.000072106974,0.000037509344,0.00023473389,0.00030222922,0.00012789211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895275,0.00017015847,0.00006459473,0.0001583224,0.0003541356,0.0003000079],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055263744,0.0010607318,0.0008279687,0.0015019989,0.0028774696,0.008211448,0.0013371571,0.0063837096,0.8772464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024633422,0.00036902528,0.00061555166,0.0011387055,0.0013233034,0.0031919687,0.0030409633,0.0025495223,0.80059105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041158703,0.000034246717,0.0003386609,0.00025727425,0.0000063918014,0.00019824119,0.00013393551,0.00005005625,0.00036678262,0.01739046,0.8755639,0.1056188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028454278,0.0000046387136,0.00017835789,0.00007486155,9.3594156e-7,0.00006661856,0.000054044875,0.000017826851,0.00004590965,0.0006488865,0.99890316,0.0000019324243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036720573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064948234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12275362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019014576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024568324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17509305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394899692","doi":"10.1515/9782763756745-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.019686108985276753,"score_gpt":0.2869931147261654,"score_spread":0.26730700574088867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394899692","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003928423,0.002037463,0.00028377443,0.005214239,0.0033558304,0.000041821735,0.0012380279,0.0003532886,0.9870826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017747679,0.0010071663,0.00015068997,0.001442922,0.00047516928,0.000019148434,0.00057314197,0.00012865421,0.9944284],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999226,0.00007155011,0.000037573343,0.00023449147,0.00030246002,0.0001280131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989612,0.00016683148,0.00006436652,0.00015777884,0.00034906509,0.00030071998],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055186497,0.0010738003,0.000832837,0.0015017771,0.002852609,0.008185332,0.0013424936,0.006393123,0.8768709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024251633,0.00037314784,0.0006246447,0.0011294134,0.0013109016,0.0031461886,0.003014766,0.0025504963,0.80090517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042960295,0.000035644964,0.0003481653,0.0002613006,0.000006760972,0.00020443402,0.00013146666,0.000051493585,0.00038836442,0.016801247,0.8760409,0.10568729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030311255,0.0000048307757,0.00018485835,0.00007501518,9.926699e-7,0.00006860592,0.00005440789,0.000018614206,0.000048543912,0.00064398494,0.9988952,0.0000020019218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035934986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063134194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12312913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018519978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002432804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17562866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394900021","doi":"10.1515/9782763747231-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canada Council for the Arts; Université Laval","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.02028808751534378,"score_gpt":0.29051669785305506,"score_spread":0.2702286103377113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394900021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037724746,0.0019704008,0.00027482855,0.0051031746,0.003246808,0.000040362385,0.0011979121,0.0003378267,0.9874515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017312822,0.0009892063,0.00014709255,0.0014054147,0.00046369643,0.000018934732,0.0005579821,0.00012553675,0.9945609],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992255,0.000072106974,0.000037509344,0.00023473389,0.00030222922,0.00012789211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895275,0.00017015847,0.00006459473,0.0001583224,0.0003541356,0.0003000079],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055263744,0.0010607318,0.0008279687,0.0015019989,0.0028774696,0.008211448,0.0013371571,0.0063837096,0.8772464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024633422,0.00036902528,0.00061555166,0.0011387055,0.0013233034,0.0031919687,0.0030409633,0.0025495223,0.80059105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041158703,0.000034246717,0.0003386609,0.00025727425,0.0000063918014,0.00019824119,0.00013393551,0.00005005625,0.00036678262,0.01739046,0.8755639,0.1056188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028454278,0.0000046387136,0.00017835789,0.00007486155,9.3594156e-7,0.00006661856,0.000054044875,0.000017826851,0.00004590965,0.0006488865,0.99890316,0.0000019324243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036720573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064948234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12275362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019014576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024568324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17509305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394932133","doi":"10.18192/jpp.v33i2.7132","title":"Where is the Justice? Where is the Truth? Where is the Reconciliation?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prisoners on Prisons","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02662158413416491,"score_gpt":0.32144641003461555,"score_spread":0.2948248259004506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394932133","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004388313,0.007915365,0.002677631,0.9537911,0.0051339124,0.000024765952,0.000050886025,0.000033431752,0.025984561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7520014,0.017468879,0.00674204,0.1802144,0.015493528,0.00026295314,0.00013221691,0.00044010332,0.027244486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95465523,0.029565314,0.0017961231,0.002636225,0.003911097,0.0074360208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93439597,0.027094467,0.005828062,0.0053662364,0.017414287,0.009900956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050415076,0.0007144269,0.0029737686,0.002813691,0.026804077,0.03222356,0.0046982206,0.02025866,0.022343226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.105506144,0.0008646914,0.001392768,0.0021884274,0.07024098,0.082899444,0.014610471,0.034618106,0.0026783352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003615391,0.00010084588,0.0010580397,0.00024667045,0.00006813618,0.00029735922,0.020921366,0.0001350197,0.00009458347,0.8475426,0.10077653,0.02872277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029602563,0.00003239185,0.0011147249,0.0017314663,0.00005624731,0.00028845787,0.07996666,0.0002797099,0.00020927547,0.7454104,0.17077462,0.000106429325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015513899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01638079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050415076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012970308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049071055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26662362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395007156","doi":"10.1111/jacc.13544","title":"Torture porn in the wake of 9/11: Horror, exploitation, and the cinema of sensation By Aaron MichaelKerner, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. 2015","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of American Culture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Movie theater; Torture; Media studies; Art history; Art; Criminology; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.009812057199330744,"score_gpt":0.2604277782170596,"score_spread":0.25061572101772883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395007156","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029890124,0.44943783,0.00097437546,0.33280617,0.02015571,0.000054158125,0.00030591918,0.00013764971,0.16623795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43047732,0.23248227,0.0014974627,0.03627607,0.018073302,0.00010955604,0.00016691638,0.0002272896,0.28068992],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965215,0.00020993658,0.000009390426,0.000031214404,0.000052291445,0.00004499661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991104,0.00059156097,0.00007842106,0.000024645706,0.0000720529,0.00012297192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010673023,0.00097291794,0.00029837093,0.00087083946,0.0043820785,0.0039625694,0.000610971,0.00236735,0.009331252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018474709,0.00046881445,0.00026297494,0.00063770945,0.0040167873,0.0046983254,0.0020631165,0.0045781084,0.0011044382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007761914,0.00004712308,0.0009232524,0.000355327,0.000020065278,0.0004084383,0.048702214,0.00006750154,0.0005935512,0.02653685,0.89231646,0.029951721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013137232,0.000041727544,0.005078211,0.0011356458,0.00002307607,0.00096727005,0.07161568,0.00012723725,0.00037460824,0.00446825,0.91613066,0.000024569552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009701716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03638724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009701716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012371518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009889483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031216145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395031151","doi":"10.29173/alr2743","title":"A Proposal for A Canadian Government Speech Doctrine","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Government (linguistics); Law and economics; Speech act; Free speech; Law; Linguistics; Political science; Business; Economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022759790868591468,"score_gpt":0.31249819465063583,"score_spread":0.28973840378204435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395031151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012122018,0.0067583597,0.018249745,0.38102233,0.004169512,0.00029732488,0.00049232016,0.00021953468,0.57666886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49762383,0.006946288,0.05937102,0.20928453,0.0022293667,0.0006402666,0.0005640899,0.0001615584,0.223179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899234,0.0014623888,0.00030065066,0.0013821577,0.004887939,0.0020434847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992019,0.001425549,0.0002330603,0.00036384986,0.004947268,0.0010112118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009693886,0.00060868013,0.00057363877,0.0035666956,0.014875397,0.011289549,0.004303875,0.012474635,0.0066559357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012291319,0.00053576345,0.0011756922,0.0029962796,0.019146662,0.004792826,0.003071035,0.01049518,0.0010484083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024669794,0.0000039354304,0.00008658005,0.000012822986,8.0927606e-7,0.00003223975,0.00046997398,0.00008391274,0.00005352055,0.98329127,0.013424752,0.002537781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006242042,0.000026351287,0.0015685062,0.00036768214,0.00002816059,0.0001264717,0.0028413292,0.0015675358,0.00035773093,0.32131037,0.671637,0.00010645081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9344658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9330125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08717752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08717752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25876698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6325202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395032720","doi":"10.1515/9782763733197-006","title":"La loyauté de l’obligation et l’obligation de loyauté : Charles Gonthier et l’obligation de bonne foi en droit civil québécois","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.013808273026845768,"score_gpt":0.2690842090396685,"score_spread":0.2552759360128227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395032720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01678469,0.04052557,0.0025922034,0.19011363,0.003060386,0.000055498615,0.00010731901,0.000051146933,0.7467095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.291735,0.0072765164,0.0011492482,0.023377499,0.0007139061,0.00009041273,0.000029157532,0.00012558936,0.6755026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692196,0.0011057035,0.00005591083,0.0003060059,0.00060546544,0.0010050009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984713,0.00068431976,0.000073446055,0.00009075599,0.00036123916,0.0003188496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033466185,0.0008079373,0.0006791348,0.00096448784,0.022078779,0.008999868,0.0014694955,0.010181521,0.013622828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045702183,0.0007822072,0.00042091374,0.0013748228,0.030660225,0.00532145,0.0034220337,0.01523913,0.0013515655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009441406,0.000014242916,0.00015654626,0.000020735813,0.00000400097,0.00013099454,0.016419744,0.00011302885,0.000066222165,0.91095716,0.06557919,0.0065287077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017754088,0.000010775631,0.0011436085,0.00027487465,0.0000058371825,0.00014573958,0.0086566275,0.00019064959,0.00009405833,0.10094536,0.8884618,0.000052831525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87237847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9322929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12762153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05602613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048450146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40649992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395054877","doi":"10.3138/md-67-1-rev8","title":"Ian Ward. <i>The Play of Law in Modern British Theatre</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Drama","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Law; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.013464792780155591,"score_gpt":0.26674888459595447,"score_spread":0.25328409181579886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395054877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006662081,0.08491601,0.002114671,0.18139674,0.031623326,0.000053614338,0.00026082067,0.00026222694,0.6927105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09092726,0.015558274,0.0009830436,0.03131645,0.002289241,0.000058289887,0.00010060099,0.000383106,0.8583837],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910575,0.0002952017,0.0000261903,0.00009370023,0.0002923145,0.00018686267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936277,0.00016878443,0.000048940965,0.000028542087,0.00018697689,0.00020400045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006590638,0.0007315654,0.00023336781,0.00062552554,0.007954116,0.004942889,0.0006833858,0.002297807,0.02885672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002307651,0.00037422832,0.00022525885,0.0009066617,0.0041815788,0.0041120476,0.002613485,0.0041821445,0.008082391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021476446,0.0000067288343,0.0001477217,0.00010296629,0.0000026216342,0.000101268975,0.007043972,0.000024462026,0.0002248939,0.029383639,0.95020074,0.012739467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014956054,0.00000563331,0.00034658276,0.000106459556,0.0000010682088,0.0001101237,0.0061757606,0.0000223039,0.000113628725,0.0017625709,0.99134564,0.000008727406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07630174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17789905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07630174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029437714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012945808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15171528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395059443","doi":"10.29173/alr2688","title":"Seven Years of Accessible Justice: A Critical Assessment Of Hryniak V. Mauldin’s Culture Shift","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030066946994741307,"score_gpt":0.40092650057023793,"score_spread":0.3708595535754966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395059443","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17165464,0.063115776,0.004526527,0.5191506,0.0036948698,0.00030499062,0.0001731147,0.00002920592,0.23735021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9287157,0.0095651625,0.0008754822,0.05643438,0.00087708177,0.00016291942,0.00003004105,0.00003678264,0.003302531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9453036,0.028125402,0.0021311266,0.0027100176,0.0152793145,0.006450549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.857149,0.10732363,0.0052434104,0.0041294643,0.02016871,0.0059858384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.068434216,0.00035713846,0.00082047953,0.005306937,0.025355374,0.019306362,0.004598864,0.011242616,0.0027076027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.112081066,0.0007392319,0.0009311439,0.0034485266,0.060416542,0.024521502,0.014051797,0.02898293,0.00013091914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007311889,0.000049373666,0.0014751687,0.00027333156,0.000030253874,0.00038689468,0.09246057,0.00014212476,0.0001287421,0.8741812,0.011500508,0.019298663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109815206,0.00024887567,0.0137089295,0.0050153206,0.00022445436,0.000396555,0.25400108,0.0006800655,0.0009979337,0.3572559,0.3671652,0.00019590087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20550933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3213453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7944907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06799257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.075981855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4933229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395085992","doi":"10.1017/9781108912402.003","title":"Law, Literature and Narrative in the RSD Oral Hearing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Literature; Audiology; Linguistics; Psychology; History; Art; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.02669235167399017,"score_gpt":0.24328095736862526,"score_spread":0.2165886056946351,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395085992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023079492,0.039817203,0.0033638605,0.02155083,0.0011754661,0.00004853246,0.00006310581,0.000048498358,0.91085297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66222745,0.041577008,0.0030597234,0.0071664583,0.0009458575,0.00018682462,0.00013642765,0.00016955557,0.2845307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976987,0.0015283993,0.00005953543,0.0001329024,0.0003445094,0.00023587915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794704,0.0016082778,0.000094435425,0.00009820048,0.00013011636,0.000121935984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017244789,0.00039441863,0.00032440678,0.0014807442,0.007430686,0.012426342,0.0009329031,0.0018265296,0.008241112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036636582,0.00028030394,0.00021356679,0.0020403515,0.022815948,0.006787064,0.0051125987,0.0033268551,0.0012776983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007724486,0.000016407692,0.00018147315,0.00018581725,0.0000018851874,0.00028729232,0.10396004,0.000113199036,0.00011203388,0.8466526,0.023933018,0.0245485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036547826,0.000015545387,0.00046463692,0.0012169605,0.0000027733097,0.00034610284,0.10025301,0.000109554014,0.00016435518,0.07710657,0.8203044,0.0000125771085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009771637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01405409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012426342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066383416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004574114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048164785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395483558","doi":"10.1177/2631309x241242146","title":"Corruption in the News: Complicity in Canadian Newspaper Claimsmaking, 1980-2023","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Complicity; Newspaper; Language change; Political science; Law; Media studies; Business; Advertising; Sociology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.047280399114725744,"score_gpt":0.3039531073672952,"score_spread":0.25667270825256944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395483558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8589304,0.0030526072,0.00037260447,0.012787239,0.0003105449,0.00007860023,0.0015450744,0.000041843352,0.12288104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907533,0.0010411184,0.00015985087,0.0006553426,0.00011101232,0.000014236379,0.000233799,0.00002001799,0.0070113083],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947785,0.00061117485,0.00019071394,0.0003707283,0.0031011763,0.0009477998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9555955,0.02192557,0.005609443,0.0009819659,0.01462648,0.0012610942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057365363,0.00033686848,0.00026640066,0.009456091,0.01392457,0.009590324,0.0011018293,0.0012412068,0.003846949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035695024,0.00037907617,0.00016939057,0.012298302,0.0073449123,0.0017267566,0.0021387383,0.0016302709,0.00029154817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004892338,0.000107125,0.10267222,0.0007062143,0.00006133412,0.0031947917,0.7076832,0.00064744154,0.0033370643,0.04313327,0.044067632,0.09390041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003170973,0.00006285866,0.34889847,0.0005094737,0.00013250779,0.00043554354,0.3657901,0.001183977,0.004129765,0.0022655795,0.27640218,0.0001577911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9603569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.968122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07025948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07025948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032900643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50977063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396533106","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197768952.001.0001","title":"Property Law in the Society of Equals","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Mathematics; Law; Law and economics; Mathematical economics; Calculus (dental); Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.038875881013957725,"score_gpt":0.2521616091091973,"score_spread":0.2132857280952396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396533106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01051755,0.0048094424,0.005234899,0.024402374,0.00030049557,0.000013222876,0.0000387242,0.000034886743,0.9546485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8905547,0.0047860453,0.0016894042,0.0038166866,0.0005455443,0.000047444,0.000042368865,0.000027182352,0.0984906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984397,0.0008922917,0.000030877574,0.00011862406,0.0003517481,0.00016681215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992291,0.00037220313,0.00007425468,0.00008806868,0.00015561192,0.000080848746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088547164,0.00028442763,0.00023817878,0.0008972269,0.003338563,0.006942451,0.0004780142,0.0016103046,0.0077457526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018456568,0.00011144249,0.00013476731,0.00092379085,0.020839985,0.0054610535,0.002544114,0.0019323325,0.00076028507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.430752e-7,0.0000019481427,0.00001444593,0.0000032964083,2.3828579e-7,0.000008269848,0.0004145342,0.000052114745,0.0000099836025,0.9966125,0.002143032,0.00073906296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020888956,0.0000052081073,0.00010894508,0.00006037055,0.0000013234239,0.000030013463,0.001991421,0.0003400556,0.000054118704,0.80343497,0.19396871,0.0000028819175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00539814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031082134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077457526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056070765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025960773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040682435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396606311","doi":"","title":"The Quebec consumer : study on the emergence of a legal figure","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.024181622893006495,"score_gpt":0.31861682257012786,"score_spread":0.29443519967712134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396606311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8887771,0.001072315,0.00018919805,0.010709006,0.00005368536,0.000053788826,0.00029878962,0.000011254372,0.09883485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94455975,0.0007728111,0.00018549855,0.0010929463,0.0000145941385,0.00002042087,0.00011109186,0.00002149957,0.05322132],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929106,0.0002508724,0.000009810096,0.00007625775,0.00016024565,0.00021183009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973097,0.00089234405,0.00020279172,0.00007171946,0.0009944958,0.0005289384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009963034,0.00021616636,0.00021559824,0.0015049436,0.017814549,0.004756245,0.0011347721,0.0023759154,0.0194271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031711748,0.00027149532,0.00017497975,0.0030101573,0.005747878,0.002519771,0.0011169725,0.0027174242,0.0008796553],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017997267,0.00039910257,0.08258836,0.00015149264,0.000018774967,0.00201286,0.77093965,0.000178029,0.0013487496,0.06358847,0.037832662,0.040761992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011154584,0.00005599062,0.09880349,0.0001549471,0.0000119390115,0.00020230643,0.8079439,0.00032892392,0.00025705356,0.0007744183,0.09142396,0.000031948286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9834772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99324423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056260694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056260694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03164016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4082018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396625315","doi":"10.4324/9781003467762-7","title":"Testify! Reflections on Cultural Legal Studies and Indigenous Legal Orders","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Sociology; Law; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.08090192399230531,"score_gpt":0.3858774916498711,"score_spread":0.30497556765756584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396625315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0904563,0.03951456,0.0016366981,0.12050913,0.0019194868,0.0000551918,0.00003707583,0.00004806671,0.7458235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87131304,0.016606959,0.0010539824,0.01050525,0.0007742389,0.00008853911,0.000023899167,0.00009927738,0.099534914],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99215186,0.005000117,0.00011400325,0.00032874904,0.0014105401,0.0009947357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936929,0.004971056,0.00021032582,0.00021775356,0.0004251933,0.00048286005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069003277,0.0005893239,0.00058282696,0.0019578107,0.027961811,0.013109268,0.0019668047,0.0040758033,0.0056892294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007210167,0.00035568574,0.00037719193,0.002931747,0.06863942,0.010117285,0.00819212,0.0077084317,0.00036678446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054629736,0.0000137403595,0.00012673474,0.000077273566,0.0000018727928,0.00049252267,0.53193855,0.00003414586,0.00009838197,0.45134982,0.009382778,0.0064787306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045893007,0.000011192429,0.00053543696,0.00037158557,0.00000337872,0.00034082774,0.54108226,0.000053555512,0.00019160283,0.034841564,0.4225484,0.000015464977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16638768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2442566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16638768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028785946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013546561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33083838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396673988","doi":"10.1080/09695958.2024.2347390","title":"“I’ve never met a barrister that sounded like I do”: accents, barristers and Bourdieusian capital","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of the Legal Profession","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Trent University; Nottingham Trent University","keywords":"Habitus; Sociology; Social capital; Social psychology; Cultural capital; Psychology; Law; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.015182708508426263,"score_gpt":0.338416966550549,"score_spread":0.3232342580421227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396673988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98544055,0.00016288045,0.00015728697,0.0010241708,0.000008066308,0.0000034633456,0.000004349563,0.0000013839178,0.013197853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99914336,0.000047866317,0.000020971238,0.000064791166,0.0000038339663,0.0000013122958,0.0000015700748,9.758852e-7,0.0007153242],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703884,0.00174923,0.000076776276,0.00018092006,0.00043202582,0.00052219024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99435544,0.002708376,0.0014067775,0.00028358062,0.00037105245,0.00087477354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029725726,0.00013023619,0.0002346091,0.0011600461,0.0053154463,0.0061053666,0.00050198275,0.00068049046,0.0031495404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075813513,0.00023609686,0.000092477545,0.00079897733,0.018913329,0.0027473583,0.0043118005,0.0018914866,0.00030081818],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011448063,0.0001363783,0.14605391,0.000037032965,0.000014671391,0.0010258764,0.7942248,0.00008876615,0.00081524363,0.03749117,0.0009822767,0.019015392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010104809,0.00012776082,0.20015796,0.00019710122,0.000014340943,0.0005495087,0.78059846,0.00017968328,0.00036611018,0.0073209754,0.010432369,0.000045579858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030686159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03737768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030686159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027231392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015570171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06101513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396756765","doi":"10.1515/9782763707990-fm","title":"Front Matter","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"paratext","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Geology; Oceanography","score_opus":0.01708649785342589,"score_gpt":0.28803693904950467,"score_spread":0.2709504411960788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396756765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008521034,0.0040925094,0.0010114039,0.007002714,0.0053050104,0.00009520166,0.0022246896,0.0010122202,0.978404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003360681,0.0022911,0.0005572087,0.002445439,0.0008198636,0.00004684283,0.0015649633,0.00039041706,0.9885234],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865735,0.00013219363,0.00007206172,0.00040906767,0.0005096302,0.00021964351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815756,0.00026456092,0.00011694297,0.00031066797,0.0005944719,0.0005557185],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008222034,0.0013310765,0.000993787,0.0019325294,0.003003215,0.010070468,0.0020460356,0.007120074,0.8543403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033405405,0.0005287557,0.00082462473,0.0014301444,0.0013939867,0.0049743946,0.004595724,0.0030837257,0.7832925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008113535,0.00005864601,0.00056949037,0.000511445,0.000012907057,0.0003374365,0.00019205717,0.00009574515,0.0007267299,0.019606655,0.810639,0.16716883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058476303,0.00000824567,0.00022658345,0.0001227618,0.0000021594283,0.00014878622,0.00008340804,0.000039503233,0.000104453226,0.0012684811,0.9979857,0.000004023159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026801953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039031897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14565969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020594923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035144598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20776576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396770790","doi":"10.54103/1971-8543/23046","title":"Comparing law and religion judgments in the rise of judicial populism. The kirpan case-law in Italy and Canada as a case-study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Stato Chiese e pluralismo confessionale","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Law; Political science; Multiculturalism; Judicial review; Judicial activism; Jurisprudence; Rule of law; Politics; Sociology","score_opus":0.026718149790695058,"score_gpt":0.31224733853478776,"score_spread":0.2855291887440927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396770790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8108962,0.001406496,0.00058654015,0.011538359,0.00011675935,0.00020489302,0.00013624641,0.000013586681,0.17510083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99442226,0.00034064494,0.00029465745,0.0011787298,0.00001564764,0.00004075087,0.000035655747,0.000008482862,0.0036632302],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855226,0.004256503,0.00027924957,0.0009787967,0.003952996,0.005009862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823689,0.008975993,0.0018563623,0.0006879233,0.003629174,0.0024816508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009975058,0.00045849578,0.00061649457,0.0044280165,0.034985635,0.00996978,0.0028357627,0.004681056,0.0036272304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032603618,0.0004572102,0.00041462254,0.005695197,0.034682285,0.0032023948,0.0073931813,0.00746272,0.00017729505],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001097011,0.00025805467,0.050048206,0.00015965952,0.00003835704,0.00579205,0.6040998,0.00037165167,0.0005473272,0.3068531,0.014586702,0.017135398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052952142,0.00006113668,0.0724291,0.0005609088,0.000077011486,0.0010495695,0.81717527,0.00092185446,0.0007007253,0.011500977,0.095329426,0.0001410968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9635661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12269695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12269695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10094243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89023286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396784763","doi":"10.7202/1111192ar","title":"“Untethered”: How the majority decision in Toronto (City) v Ontario tries (but fails) to break away from the Supreme Court of Canada’s unwritten constitutional principle jurisprudence","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Law; Legislation; Obligation; Categorical variable; Constitutional review; High Court; Constitutional right; Constitutional theory; Normative; Political science; Constitutional court; Sociology; Law and economics; Constitutional law; Politics; Constitution; Computer science","score_opus":0.023964222277309002,"score_gpt":0.292511346107088,"score_spread":0.268547123829779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396784763","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12186247,0.00942421,0.0038203376,0.28202078,0.0023694271,0.00019703465,0.0007730221,0.0000672922,0.57946545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87993366,0.0015369673,0.0008250372,0.032390054,0.00028288033,0.00006259838,0.00014882244,0.00007714447,0.084742874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98791957,0.0028255093,0.00029604742,0.0014622818,0.0029945616,0.0045020836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99480224,0.0015798539,0.0002941329,0.00032631616,0.0018799828,0.0011174694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064199246,0.00039654004,0.0006041736,0.0007721231,0.038922783,0.012904082,0.0034175878,0.011765307,0.0069619357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012897354,0.00070300535,0.000761361,0.0015237137,0.029679734,0.004911559,0.0049507753,0.011982045,0.0007192067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067872956,0.00001596378,0.0025246246,0.00006841886,0.0000440317,0.0009430576,0.043236498,0.00031716452,0.00042581026,0.83115304,0.11269416,0.008509451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016771855,0.0000472039,0.018087415,0.00042805015,0.00028166437,0.00030346774,0.0630321,0.0010264732,0.0021004835,0.14332336,0.7708403,0.00036172144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9776073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99108875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13488336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13488336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12259799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9786518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397034269","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54354-8","title":"Justice in the Age of Agnosis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Palgrave socio-legal studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06560852508282161,"score_gpt":0.355200678253646,"score_spread":0.2895921531708244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397034269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017818766,0.010480001,0.00096978014,0.08625608,0.0014216994,0.000014262812,0.000033045257,0.000036197154,0.8829702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7166764,0.003851343,0.00072790706,0.03280431,0.0016056806,0.00005938945,0.000023757535,0.000078614336,0.24417257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712414,0.0012266278,0.00007728182,0.00030570157,0.00045703,0.0008091673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978036,0.0010737673,0.00017766256,0.00023064812,0.0003187473,0.0003954523],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032638113,0.00025483168,0.0005022975,0.00097316585,0.013964625,0.0091551775,0.0007309421,0.0056567644,0.006924574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0085504,0.00026172353,0.00022265717,0.0007025506,0.029996186,0.010009298,0.0069205747,0.010404528,0.00090443256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007660799,0.00001025856,0.00009231498,0.0000086867285,0.0000012685068,0.000120285746,0.010118407,0.000021522284,0.000026546277,0.96896905,0.016034056,0.00458998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070581345,0.0000100413945,0.00040881464,0.00013983953,0.0000026100186,0.00024652525,0.0084761325,0.000067004235,0.000074685275,0.53009325,0.46045968,0.000014381577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013833953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029133232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98603535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060772174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061201383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04409349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398214886","doi":"10.1515/9780791477434-013","title":"Free Speech and <i>The Spirit of Laws</i> in Canada and the United States","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"SUNY Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Free speech; Political science","score_opus":0.01839499243344773,"score_gpt":0.2224582123539513,"score_spread":0.20406321992050358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398214886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043361306,0.050794885,0.0009236726,0.08731258,0.001590949,0.00005629446,0.0003574196,0.00007740186,0.81552553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64619434,0.014336046,0.0006029994,0.014324139,0.00031039826,0.00006238426,0.00014485726,0.00009809949,0.32392678],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704933,0.0004029313,0.00004864181,0.00020167719,0.0007640745,0.0015333657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982217,0.0005150058,0.00007725754,0.00005901882,0.0005029498,0.0006240527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017221294,0.0006053829,0.0005673549,0.0021008183,0.028556023,0.017398793,0.0019968867,0.0064450055,0.009681612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004569691,0.000599515,0.00037026286,0.004421196,0.024154289,0.0036330738,0.0031606173,0.009730786,0.0006680844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017438073,0.00002779817,0.0006004474,0.000032159896,0.0000063513485,0.00011525935,0.028843757,0.00018850532,0.00005977085,0.892669,0.060964406,0.016475096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027232547,0.00001658,0.0077751637,0.00050939753,0.000027564753,0.00006756692,0.04793411,0.00038572896,0.00021158758,0.09250861,0.8504539,0.0000824321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13070422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13070422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21999231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399040686","doi":"10.29173/mlj790","title":"A House Divided: Access to Partition and Sale under the Laws of Ontario and Manitoba","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Partition (number theory); Law; Business; Political science; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.0758916306957945,"score_gpt":0.28475085852722387,"score_spread":0.20885922783142935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399040686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55360186,0.0016692465,0.00068775046,0.029662224,0.00013243171,0.00008275636,0.00055864145,0.000016579646,0.4135885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91010374,0.0010281483,0.00024192638,0.0027803378,0.000052365125,0.00003596374,0.00008709981,0.000017608601,0.08565283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975141,0.0002426046,0.00005754171,0.00017397747,0.00062366325,0.0013880606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761105,0.00071003486,0.0002509778,0.00013642681,0.00072298676,0.00056858175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013023887,0.00019887247,0.00030100497,0.0008602865,0.016741257,0.0069971066,0.0018249047,0.0031327205,0.012214091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049621533,0.00049505796,0.0003777454,0.0022421605,0.010539837,0.0029196397,0.0036035157,0.00357826,0.00039823906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017904674,0.00010412388,0.044077523,0.000071497736,0.00004033278,0.001917101,0.13130847,0.0007123424,0.0011103252,0.75762004,0.044121254,0.018737879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000744631,0.000067813846,0.16348793,0.00044586346,0.000110976885,0.00038596685,0.32230645,0.001305882,0.0009826839,0.04473122,0.46595383,0.00014682293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98500824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07046681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07046681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07377901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5112749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399041436","doi":"10.29173/mlj797","title":"The National Academy of Sciences, Canadian DNA Jurisprudence and Changing Forensic Practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Forensic science; Jurisprudence; Political science; Engineering ethics; Law; Library science; Engineering; Biology; Computer science; Genetics","score_opus":0.06287236662659551,"score_gpt":0.32007204461215805,"score_spread":0.25719967798556254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399041436","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02634362,0.01783595,0.00036479297,0.83693653,0.0021747611,0.00006432589,0.00029069604,0.000030893407,0.115958475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5995063,0.029160896,0.003943703,0.20850825,0.0011925488,0.000184357,0.0003300254,0.000103360195,0.1570705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98918086,0.0016976076,0.0006194056,0.0010943789,0.0048197466,0.0025879315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9495009,0.011980331,0.0014564274,0.00091178936,0.020111708,0.016038872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013179291,0.00030504953,0.0005262924,0.0045179348,0.037601802,0.0138656115,0.0035257211,0.012016444,0.017111603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044269145,0.000719233,0.0004637166,0.005217413,0.023398405,0.0039457646,0.0056579714,0.009945776,0.0007001231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057692665,0.000099041514,0.022972437,0.00032832328,0.000037629146,0.0007302087,0.02391439,0.00027270714,0.00040804458,0.5195811,0.34767294,0.083925605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005772551,0.000025331432,0.05407903,0.0010898323,0.00006179127,0.0002040525,0.036053546,0.00028303365,0.0002473143,0.049208537,0.85854906,0.00014068864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9885488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18266073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18266073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.53687876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9479977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399061361","doi":"","title":"Naming, testifying, denouncing ordinary rape : restorative justice as an epistemic justice mechanism","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Mechanism (biology); Epistemology; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03833953113194419,"score_gpt":0.35072588969311935,"score_spread":0.31238635856117514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399061361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1353931,0.0024720768,0.18204972,0.034350187,0.0007347202,0.00018576947,0.000108293905,0.00025386398,0.6444523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692667,0.0004661628,0.012214498,0.0009878516,0.00012316115,0.00008772215,0.000023789395,0.000075638454,0.016754445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99173355,0.0052706795,0.00031223614,0.00077637646,0.0012412751,0.00066598685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99131495,0.0046820496,0.0010792649,0.0015856908,0.00095710537,0.00038094376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008392564,0.00041816916,0.00045189867,0.0020703715,0.006474084,0.0104917595,0.0018823508,0.004422036,0.0051405863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014521344,0.00042680185,0.00087093527,0.00083534734,0.045209642,0.012508103,0.008220501,0.004121535,0.0006945464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000118190055,0.000011683082,0.00034863126,0.00003891231,0.000004448723,0.00009227376,0.030280918,0.00012017998,0.00028482664,0.9641616,0.00043253714,0.0042120535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027624235,0.00004362741,0.0010894041,0.00029099436,0.00003556703,0.00039342602,0.03657201,0.0013552494,0.0019087526,0.86393833,0.09428045,0.00006452364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055892123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051412866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0104917595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003951314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041211336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0443846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399147354","doi":"10.2979/vic.00046","title":"Unsound Empire: Civilization and Madness in Late Victorian Law by Catherine L. Evans (review)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civilization; Empire; Art; Literature; Law; History; Philosophy; Ancient history; Political science","score_opus":0.0329469504543306,"score_gpt":0.3478368296535908,"score_spread":0.3148898791992602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399147354","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000024350466,0.9955663,0.000009622592,0.0030529588,0.0008994259,0.0000024982573,0.000009543266,0.0000010221391,0.00043418384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00051517924,0.9940295,0.00002121517,0.0025709963,0.0013820811,0.000008916749,0.00003373481,0.0000023019638,0.0014361311],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991503,0.00022165549,0.00008969555,0.00009785818,0.0003524408,0.00008810491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975139,0.0010166317,0.00035478792,0.00003261195,0.00077982654,0.00030217538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013321736,0.0010185407,0.0015773681,0.002948137,0.00084155385,0.0033555594,0.001139242,0.0023019856,0.0072780135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004774216,0.00056322233,0.0005589835,0.0052707708,0.0018079987,0.0033770762,0.0016107353,0.004524938,0.0025071679],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034737943,0.000023548486,0.0003344986,0.014558735,0.00006663038,0.000077439276,0.00040864703,0.0001328777,0.00006437494,0.0032748855,0.7630672,0.21795653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001640193,0.000025971814,0.0034927689,0.033433717,0.000065277505,0.0003756819,0.0005506776,0.00005013087,0.000025744863,0.0014849711,0.9604466,0.000032008178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07017272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037203473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009384031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07220328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399388129","doi":"10.1075/jlac.00110.ves","title":"The language of sexual violence and impropriety","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Appearance of impropriety; Sexual violence; Psychology; Political science; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.01111195449406259,"score_gpt":0.32007550884168035,"score_spread":0.30896355434761774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399388129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65135646,0.018796949,0.004824919,0.023817858,0.0006433348,0.00013524272,0.024851821,0.00013981099,0.27543363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98510194,0.0031501842,0.0011774477,0.0006769753,0.000061579216,0.000037041013,0.0030180314,0.0000785486,0.006698382],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970306,0.0011042244,0.00015676607,0.0002878111,0.0010674323,0.00035315182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98908347,0.0044254144,0.0010689956,0.0005209391,0.0044304077,0.00047079878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021710766,0.0002926259,0.0003289839,0.0055739274,0.005779838,0.005296815,0.0007544006,0.0005171588,0.00595187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010670477,0.00016131737,0.00011806838,0.010171333,0.006739421,0.0016832663,0.001609279,0.0015678103,0.0004863808],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018119151,0.000047512487,0.06493227,0.0012217726,0.000046380093,0.00079027616,0.49280855,0.0005074828,0.0022056687,0.26870328,0.07379288,0.09476263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000117275,0.000021166206,0.14460224,0.002149185,0.000039625596,0.0004796356,0.2213016,0.00046392565,0.0016426046,0.008086136,0.6211053,0.00009689122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.912812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9053929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.912812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022431944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025125975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17540288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399400728","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-55521-3_14","title":"From Art in the Service of… to the Liberation of Sense Experience and Wonder","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Law and visual jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Wonder; Sense (electronics); Art; Aesthetics; Liberation; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.021332179493131275,"score_gpt":0.33370371357245326,"score_spread":0.312371534079322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399400728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004711228,0.0068456773,0.008632053,0.0120272795,0.00071034714,0.000022743405,0.000030289315,0.00007189341,0.9669484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5933392,0.0049216496,0.0051818015,0.003979627,0.001051294,0.0001234339,0.00006714954,0.0003101952,0.39102563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829775,0.00090699334,0.00003822625,0.00016944374,0.00039164777,0.00019597418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985856,0.0008573316,0.00006279221,0.00022293684,0.00012509477,0.00014627431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019760318,0.00060741766,0.0005322983,0.0012113918,0.0060679093,0.01334925,0.0013050833,0.0028440482,0.009442095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034630846,0.00032700674,0.00044603823,0.0010481246,0.05930846,0.009200811,0.005026482,0.0065248264,0.0017552837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050818603,0.0000048733546,0.000021126392,0.00001903261,0.0000010900471,0.000019189478,0.007067688,0.000045620603,0.00005155308,0.98467064,0.0046231234,0.0034710001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000092485125,0.000013893199,0.00012049717,0.00013209513,0.0000030439373,0.0001029871,0.0066027725,0.00017853917,0.00020449149,0.76837033,0.22425184,0.000010240861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004511544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067407135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01334925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004179544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041186707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031586945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399798898","doi":"10.26034/la.cfs.2024.4624","title":"Les téléphones cryptés et leurs impacts sur le système de justice","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Criminologie Forensique et Sécurité","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.28574797558795095,"score_gpt":0.3950203741413715,"score_spread":0.10927239855342052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399798898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4292083,0.019447217,0.014325024,0.07198329,0.0011796406,0.00027488428,0.0016330292,0.00030550812,0.4616431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91082114,0.014946177,0.0037966566,0.0034782547,0.00052902603,0.00010090536,0.00029903857,0.00007639819,0.06595241],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944186,0.002380696,0.00013854643,0.0004173073,0.0016942824,0.0009505966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98613006,0.005472134,0.0019964506,0.0006238426,0.004307212,0.0014702817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003018433,0.0003750072,0.00025585806,0.001472062,0.004778169,0.007849584,0.000993547,0.0017487544,0.026856257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014846127,0.0002524114,0.0003581924,0.002160768,0.0039713886,0.0045642955,0.0030278421,0.0018253581,0.0031641435],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005769276,0.00028698414,0.13996555,0.0013622622,0.00011721375,0.001719153,0.045344412,0.0031053475,0.0029134909,0.25867227,0.051557012,0.4943794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008323548,0.0009851295,0.21810944,0.0029271902,0.00024832043,0.0021232103,0.094552055,0.0032330789,0.0022296077,0.026832474,0.6484657,0.00021063328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20427263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28260246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20427263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009528792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010656779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40616727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399926243","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-59683-4_2","title":"When Historiopraxy Becomes Heritage","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Contemporary anthropology of religion.","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.03226949922030357,"score_gpt":0.29983389765738294,"score_spread":0.26756439843707935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399926243","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009437594,0.010216776,0.0012329385,0.06874798,0.0055363597,0.000013555172,0.00007039991,0.00009555395,0.90464884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32485637,0.007491018,0.000952629,0.012684823,0.0026542053,0.000025499085,0.000081746075,0.00029298302,0.6509608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989938,0.000370719,0.000024938829,0.000107287015,0.00024983333,0.0002534653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993042,0.00019874745,0.00004588973,0.00010748434,0.000110164605,0.0002335441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014493087,0.00013367303,0.0001959755,0.0005914594,0.003761627,0.009907769,0.00042810885,0.0020008963,0.038796753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036672158,0.000206795,0.00012776686,0.0007219191,0.0078074844,0.011145969,0.0039559766,0.0041401624,0.0060477857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022245196,0.000007888469,0.0004157367,0.0000345425,0.0000018570742,0.00025554167,0.015863629,0.000015513604,0.0001418903,0.85537815,0.10352758,0.02433551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004277636,0.0000056795748,0.00029655622,0.00012091672,0.0000013120203,0.00010670506,0.01089386,0.000011243704,0.00012847566,0.034217164,0.95421046,0.000003296076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004160104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010035428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038796753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028732026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002264459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12978804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399994769","doi":"10.1086/729636","title":":<i>Communal Justice in Shakespeare’s England: Drama, Law, and Emotion</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sixteenth Century Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Drama; Economic Justice; Sociology; Literature; Psychology; Law; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.016503470855764694,"score_gpt":0.2868846568507517,"score_spread":0.270381185994987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399994769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1379051,0.030773243,0.0014642293,0.39319006,0.0053590527,0.00004404574,0.00021327373,0.00007267478,0.43097833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8801576,0.002920403,0.00024313098,0.02588435,0.00096848945,0.000054160115,0.00004291263,0.00007461682,0.08965433],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887496,0.0006626416,0.000031143474,0.00009259709,0.00011540699,0.00022325106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866986,0.00082884694,0.000110560046,0.000059907692,0.00011928233,0.00021151637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016435613,0.00040378261,0.00031070027,0.0005567215,0.015143865,0.009251643,0.0009466435,0.004919736,0.0058097355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00428061,0.00021443215,0.00015682107,0.0008567117,0.026121007,0.0058291545,0.0035481534,0.0068332944,0.0007452186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039388204,0.000020309488,0.00063596567,0.00012276958,0.000009027316,0.00026497926,0.6295263,0.00004658483,0.00017180729,0.23454224,0.12878376,0.0058368426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013988582,0.000016634871,0.0056264885,0.00043103343,0.000009567711,0.00026442955,0.5182917,0.00007932936,0.00030492674,0.027924024,0.4470059,0.000031954416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089640684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12229618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089640684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046838536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036263533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1782378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400067521","doi":"10.26443/glsars.v3i1.1399","title":"Preface: Prejudice and the Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill GLSA Research Series","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Law; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.06940392249297635,"score_gpt":0.4093314112674876,"score_spread":0.3399274887745113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400067521","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006408374,0.06942635,0.0018043692,0.28790277,0.5322941,0.00007185143,0.0007956548,0.00009433899,0.10696977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025021043,0.05085932,0.0010836591,0.09801912,0.55958873,0.00016071265,0.0007772606,0.000220647,0.26426953],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931407,0.00023647927,0.00005313302,0.000121818404,0.00022366167,0.000050925115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929202,0.0033766879,0.00025688525,0.00039161055,0.0023172835,0.000737363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013601772,0.0010978443,0.00071449735,0.0018479985,0.0042111026,0.004581006,0.0011629182,0.0039732056,0.033628892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010039423,0.0002886172,0.0005003592,0.0018437892,0.0029113255,0.0045618913,0.0016754438,0.009762422,0.014242857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007596775,0.000008072932,0.00006005709,0.00007420878,0.000001527488,0.00002864334,0.00014217633,0.000034498175,0.000045511417,0.015575752,0.9783303,0.0056917653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047807403,0.0000130969365,0.0007749757,0.00041736095,0.0000026368036,0.000065449094,0.00034501255,0.000071502924,0.000047481008,0.016036995,0.9822105,0.000010061392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011342069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009592544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033628892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003341925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021092794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11249983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400067554","doi":"10.26443/glsars.v3i1.1398","title":"Law as Prejudice: Codifying the Other","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill GLSA Research Series","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Law; Political science; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.12138607952340336,"score_gpt":0.44636561979381334,"score_spread":0.32497954027041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400067554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06585842,0.004883157,0.07259378,0.03306388,0.0011895463,0.00014494923,0.00008028986,0.00022034017,0.82196563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9486652,0.0018108768,0.01841174,0.00374175,0.00027494758,0.00009826097,0.00008517251,0.00016206197,0.026749965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954873,0.0017859525,0.00019892858,0.00050401344,0.0012805655,0.00074332097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529797,0.0019588934,0.000358482,0.000994728,0.0010322003,0.0003577324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064251493,0.00068995834,0.00068846863,0.003931607,0.011567049,0.014515382,0.0021800976,0.0036649443,0.004103373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009525751,0.00029791726,0.000833832,0.0022224677,0.06959529,0.013010653,0.008412966,0.006313479,0.00053113134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037690113,0.000006713936,0.00026324418,0.000017309269,0.0000023688597,0.0001382458,0.019299898,0.00009194852,0.00012411896,0.97469133,0.00058989885,0.004770996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011286444,0.00002139949,0.0012165175,0.0005158637,0.000025319729,0.0003283963,0.03686495,0.0008329284,0.0008217533,0.75837994,0.20093742,0.000044254342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1472671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1365693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1472671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018648975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021118082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2928198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400082017","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2024-012947","title":"Between medicine, humanities and the law: compiling a living archive of assisted dying","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Medical humanities; Politics; Digital humanities; The arts; Sociology; Law; Humanities; Medicine; Political science; Medical education; Art","score_opus":0.07376165265903926,"score_gpt":0.3221433755698803,"score_spread":0.24838172291084104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400082017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46088812,0.031414896,0.053843215,0.14943251,0.004772853,0.0008303061,0.0024843821,0.00058998977,0.29574367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9037862,0.013890933,0.040353987,0.0053336476,0.0016046556,0.00041755702,0.0011093909,0.0007580851,0.032745592],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99105716,0.006578888,0.0005299691,0.00035707443,0.0011159832,0.00036091436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9333996,0.051595267,0.0031862522,0.0066740457,0.003438551,0.0017063183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014129791,0.00037017252,0.000554418,0.011352725,0.012595132,0.018223079,0.0015617291,0.0023103873,0.00618586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049907085,0.00041958212,0.00031634248,0.010667095,0.019108571,0.0195945,0.013094963,0.004165532,0.0009324494],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029356694,0.000026534892,0.0015330324,0.00037913257,0.000008283334,0.001036003,0.83725613,0.00019095853,0.000450495,0.09094363,0.01387501,0.054271348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052359683,0.000018091148,0.0014961039,0.001212117,0.000012233894,0.0006921373,0.6001978,0.0002622186,0.0006625357,0.02805446,0.36735585,0.0000311812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003813494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013729892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018223079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00510037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072564995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07472634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400348039","doi":"10.26512/dasquestoes.v18i1.51945","title":"Libidinal Materialism:","year":2023,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Das Questões","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Materialism; Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04692172827981523,"score_gpt":0.36091275167696396,"score_spread":0.31399102339714874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400348039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016697073,0.0042771273,0.06346909,0.0460724,0.001485402,0.0001118972,0.00020570957,0.00016201641,0.8675193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86545634,0.0021070698,0.019882465,0.008783071,0.0013492784,0.00042065865,0.00016692017,0.0002333507,0.10160082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.995468,0.0024576476,0.00010720649,0.00066401425,0.0009519266,0.0003511751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656844,0.0016869513,0.00028965762,0.0006687246,0.00058118027,0.00020507816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005420513,0.0005955478,0.00049865374,0.001712476,0.004468312,0.009473615,0.0015080882,0.002553883,0.011639405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009163646,0.00033571658,0.00055043167,0.0014069021,0.030087512,0.0077260532,0.00510706,0.004262736,0.0012078949],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030336505,0.0000022758356,0.00002962363,0.000009618724,9.053806e-7,0.000010631717,0.00040681174,0.000018046221,0.00001564943,0.997572,0.0011196855,0.00081183814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012559146,0.000007777756,0.00010220904,0.00005655436,0.0000027095707,0.00005450707,0.00037156307,0.00038195698,0.00017492485,0.932552,0.06627715,0.00000614377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020539116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029602817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011639405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064861914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004552281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047060847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400424884","doi":"10.29173/crossings212","title":"Justice is Blind and So is Her Architect: Canadian Courthouse Designs and their Socio-Spatial Implications","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Crossings An Undergraduate Arts Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Aesthetics; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.06847893818488905,"score_gpt":0.34734864239434426,"score_spread":0.2788697042094552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400424884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53959304,0.0019027584,0.00835667,0.021043165,0.0002724615,0.000172646,0.0003285987,0.0001478515,0.42818278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819834,0.000632759,0.0032241961,0.0003895166,0.000008951344,0.00002454546,0.00004336489,0.000039927443,0.013653388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944344,0.0018343539,0.00010123335,0.0004869683,0.0018760876,0.0012669124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958788,0.0009051262,0.00030305094,0.00035003113,0.001680708,0.0008822735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004606766,0.00047921363,0.00027539855,0.0022804162,0.04414296,0.015043124,0.0022373472,0.001605833,0.008325079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008992624,0.00045714917,0.00032900932,0.004533572,0.028741973,0.0027040977,0.006925544,0.0016543989,0.00039221972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090248,0.0000733916,0.021593582,0.00016537965,0.000019921361,0.001780393,0.34536564,0.0022244854,0.0014566177,0.49508363,0.027861955,0.104284756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020882706,0.0000672849,0.036576048,0.00037500815,0.00004955376,0.00050619704,0.54813164,0.0021660514,0.00087271864,0.032073427,0.37897652,0.00018469534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9678889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9909671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084428914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.084428914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08768076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6125775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400610498","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jah.v2016y2016.53282","title":"Invited Guest Editorial: Quaint Memories of Puzzling Through Mysteries","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Hermeneutics","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Apprehension; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); Philosophy; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.023220034282093287,"score_gpt":0.29758787193986874,"score_spread":0.27436783765777545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400610498","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023013055,0.005733977,0.00020425275,0.15930837,0.8286313,0.000016019534,0.000057313693,0.000050031813,0.0057686414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037853126,0.003305113,0.00009667415,0.03801594,0.9287201,0.000021395195,0.00002693964,0.000081474514,0.025946993],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799997,0.00043232003,0.00012419383,0.0004066462,0.00084627967,0.0001906367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99272823,0.0040418124,0.00045548985,0.0002780977,0.0016742209,0.00082220655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031733993,0.0015632979,0.0011032316,0.0016622815,0.0038679373,0.005399589,0.0019038336,0.008559581,0.02165141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017716778,0.0005608676,0.0010744004,0.0006639925,0.004078221,0.0048250807,0.0023764872,0.015757827,0.006301954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019111387,0.000004729453,0.000023979372,0.000074453754,0.0000033782667,0.00012949412,0.00017628976,0.0000109577195,0.000060854432,0.0014241318,0.9961039,0.0019686697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009272984,0.000014952192,0.00019311497,0.00020371015,0.0000089041105,0.0002682338,0.00030185902,0.000050755654,0.00010909383,0.0014969956,0.99733365,0.000009630532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001482767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031540182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02165141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027338045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015500999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07243121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400644618","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-60077-7_3","title":"Interpretative Essay: Becoming Parrot—Voice’s Subject Formation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in animals and literature","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); History; Communication; Art; Linguistics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.04256064242905065,"score_gpt":0.3461295434765011,"score_spread":0.30356890104745043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400644618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023712927,0.007790361,0.012917192,0.18776543,0.01647044,0.00006553922,0.00019850428,0.00006695958,0.7510127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.555481,0.0025030493,0.002263824,0.019538622,0.011193245,0.00012067308,0.00019440791,0.00027341757,0.4084317],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998162,0.001132884,0.000038591643,0.0002536446,0.00026755966,0.00014530787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973694,0.0017649302,0.0001769295,0.00015723445,0.0003848372,0.00014666433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002193353,0.000478957,0.00027323252,0.00089389953,0.0051045143,0.005928835,0.00092902867,0.0028591063,0.011360648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057279216,0.00019121422,0.00025867613,0.0009000371,0.013196443,0.006651987,0.0029094466,0.004924793,0.0016546461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000244525,0.000021993204,0.00024990764,0.000081686616,0.0000049196237,0.00028468692,0.091573454,0.00004978249,0.0006102024,0.73945385,0.1567505,0.0108945565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005894796,0.000018162895,0.0008463432,0.00020078251,0.000004630939,0.0003931892,0.036314365,0.00012703995,0.00054941064,0.0448495,0.91667926,0.000011373054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003564473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063410094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011360648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031975475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038005173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400888228","doi":"10.3102/ip.24.2110032","title":"Restorative Justice: Imagined Possibilities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.024994506689692903,"score_gpt":0.36257951128181887,"score_spread":0.337585004592126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400888228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041551117,0.011418214,0.049750954,0.29603893,0.001847938,0.00009674338,0.00017894917,0.00019185961,0.59892535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688562,0.0017081065,0.010338398,0.007688448,0.0009511562,0.00023302814,0.000050392315,0.000071927134,0.010102391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907981,0.0057625533,0.00016988236,0.0007528347,0.0011714887,0.0013452078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98948646,0.0062613664,0.0005503165,0.0014748626,0.0009831038,0.0012439501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012155863,0.0008210623,0.001043904,0.0017133126,0.01210733,0.019169994,0.003766725,0.013410648,0.010897747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014192887,0.0007775412,0.00089041214,0.00097498763,0.09265011,0.028343908,0.008845712,0.011277792,0.0011185692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010040695,0.000019526884,0.000056424193,0.000020706091,0.0000037511606,0.000045012748,0.001458231,0.00014036194,0.000033314314,0.9955271,0.0015995089,0.0010859569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000141419605,0.0000060102357,0.0000521957,0.00004540025,0.000003891465,0.000051326777,0.0017703095,0.0002929454,0.00004438706,0.98797977,0.009728981,0.00001065265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024437367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047633694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019169994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057746777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00564212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064287126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401089664","doi":"10.5771/9781683933557","title":"Vigilante Justice in Society and Popular Culture","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Lexington Books","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Popular culture; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Media studies; Law","score_opus":0.021165713868302634,"score_gpt":0.28388620046603796,"score_spread":0.26272048659773534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401089664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04501604,0.011922854,0.00044030164,0.011285603,0.00042459206,0.000013192047,0.000034414807,0.000029334567,0.9308338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7784616,0.013903858,0.00029323963,0.0030055584,0.00075052376,0.00004100811,0.0000547972,0.000050382707,0.20343897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994541,0.0002864968,0.000013619957,0.000031797477,0.00014752134,0.00006657093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995413,0.00024159122,0.00005499786,0.000034094635,0.00006620956,0.00006174783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034084488,0.00024815934,0.00017575127,0.000869215,0.002947237,0.0055221664,0.00037115254,0.0006923434,0.0038282422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011540821,0.0000919325,0.00009341101,0.0016920151,0.006140719,0.002669693,0.001825353,0.0009943732,0.00053187506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010134696,0.000048915284,0.0023730847,0.000101808306,0.0000066594766,0.00031780844,0.0962785,0.00019335635,0.0002848974,0.76606023,0.06895028,0.065374345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004558532,0.00003359525,0.0066215997,0.0003377937,0.00000624317,0.000369745,0.058830827,0.00025687122,0.00018831294,0.07328422,0.86005163,0.000014667875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048787477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008529067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055221664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016964928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012363989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012806714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401309340","doi":"10.59962/9780774870498-009","title":"5 Quebec’s “Sign Law” and Freedom of Expression","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of expression; Sign (mathematics); Law; Political science; Expression (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Human rights; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.013350367892338526,"score_gpt":0.1964975317236778,"score_spread":0.18314716383133925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401309340","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024360695,0.0076024733,0.00062702975,0.007819562,0.00048638313,0.000028083063,0.00029883735,0.000044289274,0.9806573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06329674,0.00228663,0.0004915278,0.002342889,0.00008554499,0.000043933822,0.000119096716,0.000045440745,0.93128806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989166,0.00019794605,0.000024814726,0.00011118177,0.00036874588,0.0003806685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994056,0.0001561431,0.000022961105,0.000056248573,0.00028199275,0.000076970646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068771647,0.0007219672,0.00038504126,0.0015891546,0.011432993,0.009406879,0.0011523437,0.0040893513,0.044362165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001693792,0.0004775954,0.0003991231,0.0021713586,0.005888436,0.0021559,0.0012283319,0.004821464,0.0035842324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008525253,0.000016644584,0.00026936957,0.000041684838,0.0000029886637,0.00009245593,0.002532719,0.00014652479,0.00008705151,0.7838079,0.19443148,0.018562723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056447743,0.0000048214215,0.0014184286,0.000117395764,0.0000049770324,0.000051778352,0.0009571873,0.00016119966,0.00014450258,0.018517938,0.9785987,0.000017394028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97397536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98720574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04697808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04697808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04422407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34085143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401336674","doi":"10.16995/dscn.11068","title":"Unboxing the Archive with SpokenWeb UAlberta: A Case Study in Literary Audio Rights","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Studies / Le champ numérique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Western University; University of Lethbridge; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Audio visual; Art; Literature; Multimedia; Computer science","score_opus":0.021386705652957253,"score_gpt":0.30097195917964414,"score_spread":0.2795852535266869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401336674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9518906,0.0013281561,0.0042813136,0.0056705237,0.00012325005,0.0002844797,0.00007695128,0.00006225373,0.036282487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789227,0.0009259634,0.0032783716,0.0006625699,0.000076781726,0.00028043165,0.00003067102,0.000067334855,0.015755076],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825952,0.012830613,0.0006124468,0.00092909293,0.0016454012,0.0013871918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97560215,0.018458897,0.0016487396,0.0019053337,0.0010165414,0.0013681728],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011038347,0.0007848578,0.0009933842,0.0039608628,0.03881541,0.012517619,0.0036876479,0.006769065,0.0063527822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02463954,0.0007564649,0.0007186627,0.0050049457,0.029218975,0.0102393385,0.0127131585,0.005101154,0.00082294375],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029023648,0.00009716519,0.0012026315,0.00010165146,0.000004474345,0.0045637754,0.97333074,0.000059863334,0.0004252089,0.012510273,0.0006174879,0.0070577026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005499,0.000035421912,0.0010041607,0.00020215189,0.00000858606,0.001482277,0.9700771,0.00011593615,0.00077523413,0.0016177874,0.024662279,0.000013544817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02373228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04838448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98748237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009979343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050932006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07240552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401432074","doi":"10.1177/17438721241268889","title":"From the Museum to the Studio: Rethinking Visual Representations of White-Washed Stories of North American History","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law Culture and the Humanities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Colonialism; Visual culture; White (mutation); Resistance (ecology); Order (exchange); Representation (politics); Studio; Visual arts; Sociology; History; Art; Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Archaeology; Politics","score_opus":0.03327252539287641,"score_gpt":0.2982270825503907,"score_spread":0.2649545571575143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401432074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7235654,0.0019275183,0.006588005,0.016327865,0.0003726211,0.000086417334,0.0002482166,0.00019341739,0.2506905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811101,0.0007061876,0.0012217127,0.00064850465,0.000057553945,0.000049975748,0.00005921312,0.00018923367,0.015957573],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745935,0.0017660897,0.00003410539,0.00015750181,0.00028342707,0.00029953854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99274915,0.0054334933,0.0004344063,0.00046765452,0.0004948917,0.00042041388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033579362,0.00072228175,0.0002417398,0.0029331075,0.013727348,0.01211207,0.0013363792,0.0015802754,0.007029254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01149075,0.00054776977,0.00024402334,0.0021467775,0.023178414,0.0076522985,0.0070447745,0.003080145,0.00035884607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011833304,0.0000048625884,0.00044382512,0.000022868666,0.000002218587,0.00012963323,0.986527,0.000033821427,0.00021392421,0.0074491845,0.0014062392,0.003754544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029499436,0.000009998106,0.0019586082,0.00016133202,0.000010118546,0.00011533816,0.89213187,0.00021462566,0.00032031292,0.003254063,0.10180313,0.000017614724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15478152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.362394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8452185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009079317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004783347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3077612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401504896","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4907057","title":"Welfarism and Person-Centred Justice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Welfarism; Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Welfare","score_opus":0.014595189501452135,"score_gpt":0.27114913857861267,"score_spread":0.25655394907716056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401504896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11769869,0.00093650515,0.013279365,0.027433706,0.00057080155,0.000064522355,0.00004180646,0.00006863209,0.839906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98494935,0.00006513718,0.0005735345,0.0015880743,0.00006544591,0.0000214052,0.00000957319,0.000022899912,0.0127046965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853125,0.0075761164,0.00036220366,0.001524571,0.0013046497,0.0039199167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907652,0.0035122472,0.0011849737,0.0011762098,0.0009723097,0.0023890934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011256999,0.00040873105,0.00076181133,0.0016806136,0.017979564,0.013975772,0.0018342076,0.00719821,0.010384756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011877568,0.0003234729,0.00075517956,0.0012134613,0.055556066,0.006447989,0.011194081,0.0074281055,0.0008761742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025510979,0.000059881808,0.00076003,0.000018757968,0.0000140946295,0.000102339705,0.023544183,0.00008698489,0.0000953248,0.9688037,0.0018705735,0.0046185236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045011195,0.00006502836,0.00236286,0.000074700285,0.000020583899,0.00016589381,0.028722206,0.0002167052,0.00033351962,0.9175912,0.050364714,0.00003752013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007656294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012581281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017979564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006077378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007235167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059533358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401535367","doi":"10.7202/1107494ar","title":"L’ENCADREMENT JURIDIQUE DE LA PUBLICITÉ ÉCOLOGIQUE FAUSSE OU TROMPEUSE AU CANADA : UNE NÉCESSITÉ POUR LA RÉALISATION DU POTENTIEL DE LA CONSOMMATION ÉCOLOGIQUE ?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.006280944439975655,"score_gpt":0.21312248322870037,"score_spread":0.20684153878872472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401535367","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3546744,0.014560743,0.005771097,0.39265472,0.0008164398,0.00010008453,0.0018874133,0.00018891547,0.22934619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9473867,0.003975046,0.001842292,0.010566658,0.00012630633,0.00003156186,0.00020694718,0.000044563763,0.03582001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961618,0.00039673335,0.000074295225,0.0003168036,0.0016950963,0.0013552145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880987,0.0022667346,0.0014022025,0.000433234,0.004958259,0.0028408442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028416084,0.00023537941,0.000399695,0.001226247,0.008981239,0.0070732804,0.0015464606,0.002404273,0.013278736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011222004,0.00035169467,0.00035562622,0.0020705874,0.00857721,0.0035389033,0.0038263097,0.004097498,0.00053208956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002507072,0.00013912446,0.14728066,0.00074682565,0.0001430028,0.0012984155,0.052354746,0.002082791,0.0041518775,0.47308052,0.13631004,0.18216135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005974981,0.00009833038,0.355364,0.00090896134,0.00008546033,0.00032265345,0.04197935,0.002076716,0.0016467375,0.025385607,0.57178885,0.00028359922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98579687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99300367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07817862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07817862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1480364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56722826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401924584","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-68172-1_8","title":"The Master-Scene: Instant World and the Right to Communicate","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Global transformations in media and communication/Global transformations in media and communication research","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Instant; Computer science; Communication; Human–computer interaction; Psychology; Biology; Food science","score_opus":0.05808624214118225,"score_gpt":0.36124815225342993,"score_spread":0.3031619101122477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401924584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013738679,0.003930781,0.0043125055,0.0126990415,0.0010337859,0.000023768696,0.000042690364,0.000058304526,0.9765253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3010033,0.0057349773,0.0041917716,0.008727799,0.0023007202,0.00017203068,0.00012438525,0.0004484852,0.6772966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976693,0.0011014346,0.000064887565,0.00029402145,0.00053659803,0.00033373604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985713,0.0006779671,0.000093394134,0.00027436978,0.0001883911,0.00019447604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002796372,0.0008211092,0.0005601403,0.0011043645,0.0063812872,0.013578739,0.0010523344,0.0039020681,0.02098163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039672884,0.00044592307,0.00038506254,0.001176909,0.03577035,0.018888673,0.004951847,0.00926136,0.004397582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034429804,0.0000031135482,0.000009646966,0.000011390592,5.263386e-7,0.000010236142,0.002518942,0.000017597666,0.000030271643,0.9875951,0.0077400017,0.0020597943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009606783,0.000010885258,0.00007653169,0.000110678535,0.0000031465727,0.00005487205,0.002987291,0.000093751776,0.00017696554,0.5500766,0.44639033,0.0000093933395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061469562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077258446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02098163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040894346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049079177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07019055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401988673","doi":"10.7202/1112847ar","title":"“We Can Speak for Ourselves”: An Applied Theatre Workshop About Decolonization for Judges","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Percées Explorations en arts vivants","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Assembly of First Nations; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Psychology; Pedagogy; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.07607365866120648,"score_gpt":0.3645204700310107,"score_spread":0.2884468113698042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401988673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.494354,0.003463762,0.05353157,0.12879473,0.018708406,0.012742114,0.0011330041,0.0006914884,0.2865809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8294584,0.0015762412,0.023255324,0.024753677,0.0024211444,0.015950685,0.00057515665,0.000635177,0.10137418],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9616107,0.030505488,0.0008152863,0.0014022114,0.001603366,0.0040629334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967192,0.020416478,0.0009905015,0.0015007743,0.0024406945,0.007459531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03085205,0.0011434158,0.0008263682,0.0007247011,0.024189493,0.0061021326,0.0035988346,0.008006895,0.01741326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04885505,0.00084831927,0.0013421688,0.0007337955,0.012548542,0.0044878777,0.021404138,0.015188727,0.0035445055],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010262162,0.0027881484,0.0012166662,0.0012460009,0.00003948579,0.00320243,0.81440395,0.0006073824,0.0064190705,0.022694692,0.099446476,0.04690957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044462277,0.001292013,0.0042426833,0.00082525756,0.000035054298,0.0005415183,0.401344,0.00045787735,0.00320935,0.011232666,0.5762131,0.00016183921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043384996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013541051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03085205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059041018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013078077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16316319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401990642","doi":"10.4337/9781035307050.00009","title":"“The winter we danced”: Emotion, embodiment, and Indigenous legal orders in the Canadian constitutional law classroom","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law; Political science; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.01851491026558276,"score_gpt":0.2509667872297935,"score_spread":0.2324518769642107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401990642","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1511211,0.0047856723,0.0018188129,0.044902924,0.00047418367,0.000041958414,0.00007981139,0.00009038452,0.79668516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91000193,0.0014171053,0.00060691434,0.0022088995,0.000060433427,0.000026107067,0.000022624661,0.00006146297,0.085594565],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975424,0.00063474284,0.000027486829,0.0001812685,0.00075349904,0.00086072314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985343,0.000539909,0.00007894958,0.000058443726,0.00028689698,0.0005015477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022224763,0.00050554133,0.00041990585,0.0014254352,0.027373007,0.016854582,0.0018290133,0.0029180478,0.009513931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004324606,0.00034343603,0.0002584284,0.0018621128,0.049857523,0.0047956132,0.004502304,0.006616314,0.00052200287],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015331692,0.00003422792,0.0012725035,0.000037363057,0.0000032550015,0.00011779709,0.6791267,0.00009062134,0.00038603245,0.2815676,0.018453512,0.01889502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010125058,0.000014532551,0.0076400954,0.00019397332,0.000012185206,0.000070594324,0.70686907,0.00027031262,0.00024171932,0.032592233,0.25203234,0.000052867363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96270293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9850167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05578824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05578824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07841654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4047739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402438107","doi":"10.69970/gjlhd.v12i1.1261","title":"‘It Begins with Victoria’ — The Yoorrook Justice Commission &amp; Innovating Transitional Justice for First Nations Australia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Griffith journal of law and human dignity.","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transitional justice; Commission; Economic Justice; Colonialism; Political science; Law; Royal Commission; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Empowerment; Democracy; Public administration; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.07394768986293139,"score_gpt":0.36465621110109775,"score_spread":0.2907085212381664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402438107","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048656672,0.029862845,0.011809918,0.52497673,0.004579452,0.0002493112,0.000040989617,0.00011385125,0.37971032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72610056,0.009093212,0.013499337,0.079269834,0.00035942657,0.00013436485,0.00002811875,0.000096554984,0.17141864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99389607,0.003023869,0.00014946221,0.0003674446,0.0012739265,0.0012892885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99497706,0.0010825692,0.0003080389,0.0002700246,0.0010338897,0.002328387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064669633,0.00016457637,0.00017656271,0.00045729044,0.010930444,0.010055819,0.0007756408,0.0053577763,0.0039647287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0126913255,0.00030281342,0.000279746,0.0004773094,0.009696312,0.0066011003,0.0068933484,0.007224318,0.00052047335],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018511439,0.000043781336,0.001613535,0.00024038574,0.000008725042,0.00043166726,0.047148086,0.00023613116,0.00077371794,0.80006003,0.083613776,0.065811634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065370805,0.00004777646,0.0027391594,0.00070919975,0.000006017815,0.00027812575,0.01784924,0.0004789802,0.00039555473,0.06282759,0.9146138,0.000048028036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17924151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33002546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17924151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014760791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049692232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35639644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402445895","doi":"10.2307/jj.18255149.15","title":"Free Speech and The Spirit of Laws in Canada and the United States:","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"State University of New York Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Free speech; Political science","score_opus":0.025993161831708352,"score_gpt":0.20040942011125418,"score_spread":0.17441625827954582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402445895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05540385,0.062486038,0.0010221037,0.12227308,0.0014064786,0.000058594444,0.00054862665,0.00007145059,0.7567299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74863493,0.01936242,0.0007196053,0.011773709,0.00031631926,0.00006285695,0.0001857689,0.00007243102,0.21887192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978903,0.00029413766,0.000030702944,0.0001364555,0.0005865015,0.001061929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980907,0.0006045325,0.00008439865,0.00004846588,0.00057139964,0.0006005369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015298475,0.00052735826,0.00046478247,0.0022095933,0.022814125,0.017172081,0.0019085038,0.005751964,0.0074992715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004879866,0.0004015461,0.00033008252,0.0049824137,0.020142157,0.0042670774,0.0028700884,0.006868581,0.0004838569],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016896287,0.000029974974,0.0009222228,0.000037884332,0.0000058266846,0.00012722566,0.041642904,0.00022096018,0.000049111324,0.87286806,0.062839836,0.02123902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002300399,0.000013345837,0.011910466,0.00054625043,0.000029759869,0.0000734753,0.07790523,0.0005371432,0.00019822484,0.098375015,0.81031847,0.00006967975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.993341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11897254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11897254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24319543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8632102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402645683","doi":"10.7202/1113114ar","title":"Ekberg, Carl J. et Sharon K. Person. Dawn’s Light Woman &amp; Nicolas Franchomme. Marriage and Law in the Illinois Country (Carbondale, Southern Illinois University Press, 2022), 264 p.","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue d histoire de l Amérique française","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gerontology; Sociology; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.011110385607723424,"score_gpt":0.21441313836482837,"score_spread":0.20330275275710494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402645683","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034792637,0.90742224,0.00031648076,0.048978277,0.0075825397,0.000024479948,0.00029609937,0.00003450636,0.034997445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015370924,0.7508244,0.0011738193,0.027204914,0.0037932585,0.00013533254,0.000370492,0.0001378585,0.20098904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986343,0.00021236645,0.00009165082,0.00016149024,0.0007201231,0.00018012359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772066,0.0008036134,0.00029101092,0.000042647665,0.00089158956,0.0002505099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015982465,0.0020160098,0.0007838876,0.0043578343,0.004019205,0.0041233576,0.0016675069,0.0042237528,0.031420406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043266024,0.001085948,0.00043552654,0.004594718,0.0024927587,0.00805784,0.001987216,0.0044489373,0.013749813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022190901,0.000014189911,0.00033175576,0.0002485025,0.0000057494162,0.00006703201,0.0009362636,0.000023230927,0.000041048905,0.0068536806,0.945909,0.045547336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069384437,0.000006472573,0.0020972746,0.00091900694,0.0000060732045,0.00012559867,0.0015969595,0.000010087292,0.00008337348,0.0028300441,0.9923024,0.00001574041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17795224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3554215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17795224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067886137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007887334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35383284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402766074","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4963743","title":"Law, Literature, and The Legal Imagination","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and literature; Imagination; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0037502935675350116,"score_gpt":0.26459823487265693,"score_spread":0.2608479413051219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402766074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03961728,0.07083987,0.0028281822,0.33898017,0.0010753935,0.00001897736,0.0001017783,0.000040057315,0.5464983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95818657,0.013507363,0.0010828591,0.012072421,0.0018182861,0.000043235657,0.000036413145,0.000038511622,0.013214425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.992427,0.005690224,0.00021977084,0.00043540075,0.00078636344,0.00044117132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96547514,0.028875222,0.0015880865,0.001153262,0.0016513849,0.0012569509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010457992,0.00039798065,0.00065065804,0.0067627016,0.0104361195,0.02600071,0.0015893271,0.010545398,0.009273566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023198618,0.00034668614,0.00032998217,0.0053292573,0.087014355,0.017850578,0.005439747,0.0061684246,0.0007975358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000760171,0.000015251001,0.0001583969,0.000036952166,0.0000024174674,0.000054646305,0.008765011,0.00004467445,0.000023527215,0.98427,0.0036099826,0.0030115598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015697218,0.000009175118,0.00023380479,0.00027321756,0.0000035077642,0.00007000258,0.019996792,0.0001324494,0.00004004608,0.91583836,0.06337581,0.000011190258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062518376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006744818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02600071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070605883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007125418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055307806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402983193","doi":"10.3138/chr.105.2.br15","title":"<i>Building Justice: Frank Iacobucci and the Life Cycles of Law</i>. Shauna Van Praagh.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Historical Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Criminology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.027771723731022727,"score_gpt":0.30861761100127716,"score_spread":0.28084588727025445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402983193","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023041423,0.6200691,0.000274419,0.3583785,0.0058129113,0.0000059484987,0.00004805745,0.000016458389,0.015164215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044212595,0.7130202,0.0009842891,0.18405361,0.012036209,0.00006811683,0.00011614368,0.00013908814,0.045369755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975682,0.0010774413,0.000087909895,0.00028633658,0.0007150504,0.00026507227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99503726,0.0033070748,0.0002657545,0.00013722439,0.0009652939,0.00028743077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032243505,0.000939034,0.00069819245,0.0022814525,0.0065093217,0.0052311732,0.001283943,0.0064976853,0.005489181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009490033,0.0006038009,0.00034659015,0.003892668,0.011179733,0.013008119,0.0024086344,0.008639925,0.001651846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000117032405,0.0000061147243,0.00010142757,0.00019574181,0.0000036502972,0.0000350428,0.0017476652,0.000035368645,0.000013287221,0.13491453,0.8516496,0.011285912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068802983,0.000004341196,0.00036429195,0.001095833,0.0000049782066,0.00007824745,0.0017463282,0.00004354699,0.0000625216,0.07160309,0.924974,0.000015911299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09580599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18462643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.904194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076657115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011152314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19049668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403147027","doi":"","title":"Juris Ex Machina : aux confluences du droit, de l'art et de la gouvernance des machines","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologique; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.009348446361696159,"score_gpt":0.2721401318556039,"score_spread":0.2627916854939077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403147027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086860836,0.004114002,0.0081961015,0.03610774,0.0005665126,0.000035224646,0.000041170708,0.000055336615,0.86402315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9484907,0.00067982794,0.0010227864,0.0022816695,0.00039827646,0.000056249817,0.0000138371115,0.0000569461,0.046999853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925532,0.0035240022,0.00020052798,0.0011810347,0.0014355595,0.0011056568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931901,0.0051909788,0.00040164718,0.0005042228,0.00041734343,0.0002956979],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060320697,0.00034014662,0.00070734567,0.001164965,0.016974526,0.013897746,0.0012964506,0.006449389,0.0050459024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010814066,0.00074223336,0.00038971272,0.0010088274,0.043330684,0.008838721,0.0073479097,0.013771946,0.0006225268],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040323603,0.0000029273644,0.00007491219,0.0000052669843,6.958778e-7,0.000054325785,0.0080766445,0.000010504481,0.00005221073,0.99037665,0.0005516648,0.00079012313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039479477,0.00004725133,0.0024124763,0.00016019441,0.000015611586,0.0005281661,0.02256855,0.0005449353,0.0009836287,0.6516564,0.3210084,0.000034867808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009317792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01302342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9830255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004850031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057199717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403271841","doi":"10.4000/12dw7","title":"Écouter la justice. Contribution à une histoire sonore des espaces et des acteurs des procédures judiciaires","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Criminocorpus revue hypermédia","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0598665016478881,"score_gpt":0.32475256395577046,"score_spread":0.26488606230788236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403271841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070121825,0.056600306,0.02211184,0.16637291,0.010103235,0.00009653844,0.00016721344,0.00018521766,0.6742409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7316279,0.015174179,0.0045785387,0.01760476,0.0020446675,0.00007878994,0.00006576369,0.00028015094,0.22854537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99485,0.0029928493,0.00011704121,0.00044210505,0.0012146075,0.00038335402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951747,0.003132486,0.0003324542,0.0003504994,0.0007293031,0.00028053284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034450218,0.0005930377,0.00024034434,0.0014771494,0.009943401,0.011192223,0.0009224983,0.0046046544,0.0074790833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008284215,0.0003050498,0.0003236416,0.000872417,0.02523222,0.00786378,0.0040181195,0.00603561,0.0014394871],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041400544,0.000042187556,0.0012101599,0.00028327858,0.000014544162,0.0008511063,0.36054683,0.00018058602,0.0014556138,0.5017318,0.06794199,0.06570053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034998186,0.000020760028,0.0013727176,0.0005899535,0.000005067238,0.0004907555,0.0811208,0.00010372444,0.0012010979,0.021182364,0.8938862,0.000023107616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016402079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034057293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016402079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055019166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004467667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039919317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403271963","doi":"10.4000/12dwb","title":"Le son dans les procès filmés en France","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Criminocorpus revue hypermédia","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.036845198332584185,"score_gpt":0.28596065813125243,"score_spread":0.24911545979866825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403271963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22076532,0.018688437,0.0037113356,0.03079401,0.0020784198,0.00006227798,0.00033740824,0.00033548122,0.7232273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7863397,0.0060320944,0.0011797782,0.0016998262,0.0005553145,0.000036184327,0.00009878808,0.00015418231,0.20390418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983101,0.000820976,0.000034399804,0.00022156163,0.00034856301,0.00026441243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989053,0.0005159395,0.00013985728,0.00005888613,0.00023348538,0.00014660468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012165207,0.0006572977,0.00023867661,0.0016067505,0.008404016,0.007868565,0.00048009396,0.0017644815,0.020410173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030831671,0.0002757117,0.00026644816,0.0012890219,0.006600703,0.003461686,0.0017007435,0.0025704182,0.00148394],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021247505,0.000055705317,0.0040494883,0.00034032887,0.00002874717,0.0025146026,0.29220232,0.00060353853,0.0026014585,0.5379558,0.06738946,0.09204603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010708275,0.000041846335,0.004039625,0.00018148882,0.0000070404217,0.0004109537,0.037288345,0.00013409383,0.0005808864,0.0027045382,0.95458037,0.000020120071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18528324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20324941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18528324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013363696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036253282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36840957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403272140","doi":"10.4000/12dwc","title":"Focus : Les archives audiovisuelles de la justice","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Criminocorpus revue hypermédia","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.044917511965526236,"score_gpt":0.32470261387156696,"score_spread":0.2797851019060407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403272140","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038480688,0.018583294,0.021074587,0.023820722,0.005092437,0.00029770695,0.0015155025,0.0010429026,0.8900922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47883922,0.016885972,0.016955255,0.009279364,0.004562675,0.00062891364,0.00130312,0.00084826903,0.4706972],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998114,0.00066215644,0.00008035588,0.0002831385,0.00057631056,0.0002840673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945809,0.0025939685,0.0005381695,0.00064418075,0.0012017265,0.0004409391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001687178,0.0004744,0.00024269566,0.0033207831,0.006322217,0.009942233,0.0009296634,0.0021362903,0.04602481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077851242,0.00023695495,0.0004040755,0.003785301,0.0035059282,0.0057636173,0.004843173,0.0023885313,0.007916143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003833439,0.00015903344,0.0038886708,0.002054709,0.000039805596,0.0028296052,0.13219897,0.00031280515,0.012830161,0.22096305,0.22916375,0.3951761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016972092,0.000037808026,0.0045653097,0.00077865395,0.000018159632,0.0012014947,0.029524598,0.00006675305,0.003073532,0.007030391,0.95366085,0.00002552083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013812126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026740136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04602481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034608997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055117565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15396827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403319188","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4948593","title":"Book Review of How to Conduct a Sentencing Hearing in Canada by Gregory Koturbash&amp;nbsp;","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.01755554723311887,"score_gpt":0.28397320216419036,"score_spread":0.2664176549310715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403319188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001953177,0.36892638,0.0027451275,0.19210751,0.040472414,0.00041897377,0.0038220058,0.00066982786,0.38888457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0077673085,0.15338689,0.002130084,0.023125876,0.003179193,0.00012662423,0.0010104656,0.00029607659,0.8089775],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851876,0.00013777966,0.00005996722,0.000107215754,0.0009975958,0.00017862418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952651,0.00074457243,0.00011810342,0.00007311839,0.0033916417,0.00040742222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016982721,0.00071726344,0.0009212312,0.0028382728,0.004159413,0.00364209,0.0020465662,0.0027243334,0.041578285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006800813,0.000635296,0.00042785794,0.004427018,0.0019220739,0.0013569186,0.00083848584,0.003156568,0.013000975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003886516,0.000006453618,0.00007154,0.00016270933,0.0000019953861,0.00003498859,0.00010676938,0.00010535383,0.00003752518,0.0015776799,0.96113956,0.036751576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029801083,0.000004277264,0.0006934913,0.0002690535,0.000003996384,0.00004484161,0.00015827417,0.000036051286,0.000027027312,0.00027982637,0.99847144,0.00000874015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9310986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98461425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06890142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030974686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08637733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22473812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403485745","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2024.2414307","title":"Lies with a Straight Face: Exposing the Cranks and Cons Inside the “Ex-Gay” Industry","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Homosexuality","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"cons; Face (sociological concept); Homosexuality; Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.04335867174122153,"score_gpt":0.3467516689173719,"score_spread":0.30339299717615037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403485745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1325092,0.013561101,0.0036105923,0.1716091,0.0023808181,0.00001620789,0.000033074786,0.00002742446,0.6762525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90160066,0.004287492,0.00051522127,0.019205706,0.0005657471,0.000020776935,0.000012751172,0.000058750895,0.07373289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981628,0.0013129656,0.000012260147,0.00006514013,0.00018436342,0.00026255756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991391,0.00047857966,0.00006821779,0.00005720989,0.00010481516,0.00015209557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017745366,0.00035275644,0.00018343094,0.00057476974,0.012922985,0.006474884,0.0005492208,0.003673132,0.004948556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026541953,0.00020214736,0.00018052805,0.0004305926,0.022009134,0.0066621844,0.0040558805,0.0076754573,0.0007241985],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027673645,0.000024226032,0.0006047718,0.0000211964,0.0000038332173,0.0004778651,0.24457091,0.000057969977,0.00014200989,0.6960766,0.04904257,0.008950453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012381053,0.00003267852,0.0015479027,0.0003672698,0.00000726002,0.0005336619,0.32215133,0.0002054745,0.00034058554,0.14737405,0.5274024,0.000024958807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012110878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03279696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012922985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00266411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020432295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024080813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403768162","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4998692","title":"The Deepest Sense: Revitalizing Links Between Law and Touch","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sense (electronics); Law; Political science; Engineering; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.01114756738262241,"score_gpt":0.2919100145355128,"score_spread":0.2807624471528904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403768162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15741856,0.003622349,0.042740446,0.08693969,0.0014123269,0.000056647397,0.00007276147,0.00017793651,0.70755935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981503,0.00040288075,0.0018289268,0.0028473039,0.0001538274,0.00003587441,0.000013274622,0.00009219152,0.013122566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99516296,0.0026190246,0.00013903863,0.0007598006,0.00066574477,0.00065333897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98520166,0.008291327,0.00076648255,0.0034117422,0.0012159066,0.0011129549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054167635,0.0004926764,0.0006028386,0.0018216668,0.008201222,0.0156418,0.0020352837,0.004412375,0.014977355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022045728,0.000467889,0.0005740594,0.0011882365,0.057611685,0.026711844,0.020652484,0.009923442,0.0012800212],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025756206,0.00001881355,0.0005879276,0.00003888763,0.000005606164,0.00007766701,0.04035453,0.00006395547,0.00024675226,0.94634634,0.0019886831,0.010245077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017160746,0.000027813523,0.0005439045,0.00014546806,0.000011278586,0.00011922079,0.028538784,0.0002584479,0.00028263446,0.9250342,0.045002975,0.000018063565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023509827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039007936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0156418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027349438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038267097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05010426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403890589","doi":"10.1017/lsr.2024.33","title":"<i>Law By Night</i>. By Jonathan Goldberg-Hiller. Durham: Duke University Press, 2023.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law & Society Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.0121318046002864,"score_gpt":0.2630917796252047,"score_spread":0.2509599750249183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403890589","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020019688,0.77217615,0.00036504507,0.066519186,0.016657721,0.0000601041,0.0021891666,0.0003158742,0.1415166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007882542,0.3361941,0.0006663825,0.021403993,0.004878754,0.00016480994,0.0018079259,0.0004001871,0.62660134],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986571,0.00022825414,0.00011451481,0.00012535343,0.00072669185,0.0001480145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978454,0.00050601066,0.00025287882,0.00013565867,0.0010185294,0.00024155561],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012571358,0.0012954503,0.0007857722,0.0028860306,0.0020283791,0.0028153975,0.0011486948,0.0026158018,0.08300961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049430416,0.000904904,0.0005319075,0.004245226,0.0013910752,0.0033207955,0.001311596,0.0028008523,0.0578978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002557987,0.0000016889342,0.000023213337,0.000101098834,0.0000010591733,0.000009357727,0.000029541943,0.0000103290195,0.00001592898,0.0010179805,0.985644,0.013143271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017064888,0.0000022786526,0.00045949372,0.00031313585,0.0000017922093,0.000026358937,0.000084180334,0.00001171229,0.00001459322,0.0007089776,0.9983725,0.000003331591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1341191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24271418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049790745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062380363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27769476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403905446","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5003991","title":"Chaosmosmotic Epistemology: A Transdisciplinary Metatheory of Contemporary Legal Complexity?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Metatheory; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03855595191909063,"score_gpt":0.3239087653008252,"score_spread":0.28535281338173457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403905446","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10246163,0.008264828,0.5463396,0.119252644,0.0011013235,0.000095850824,0.00042079366,0.00030245326,0.2217609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9596078,0.0018426223,0.031009018,0.0015867408,0.0008884925,0.00014877881,0.0001415268,0.000105000814,0.004670062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979894,0.0010123735,0.00009625011,0.00037067704,0.0003597573,0.0001715654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913502,0.005319029,0.0006651031,0.0013936514,0.0007706495,0.0005013285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005273021,0.0005253372,0.0009955757,0.0046126274,0.0029378652,0.008094618,0.002347202,0.0030231937,0.007854217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011881168,0.00040981724,0.0009817474,0.0027139063,0.02694173,0.02140127,0.0042264587,0.0036733046,0.0006335005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018285218,0.0000026209307,0.0000804761,0.000008918548,0.000002375209,0.000005336978,0.000287741,0.0001398311,0.000008118912,0.998444,0.00024740442,0.00077130913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018965957,0.0000011571433,0.000036727408,0.000011069463,0.0000012345787,0.0000071579097,0.00012479063,0.00068808696,0.000011917403,0.9975325,0.0015812187,0.0000022450663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002098089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017311942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008094618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004513116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031875188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032745063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403911225","doi":"10.3368/m.116.3.543","title":"A Decolonizing Ear: Documentary Film Disrupts the Archive.<i>By Olivia Landry. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2022. 218 pages + 12 b/w images. $75.00 hardcover or eBook.</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Monatshefte","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Art history; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.011187888114801153,"score_gpt":0.2556424261446433,"score_spread":0.24445453802984213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403911225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060597593,0.28364834,0.0011582251,0.23306051,0.020943485,0.00008003116,0.0005661803,0.0006352421,0.45384815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062068835,0.07558556,0.0010968186,0.021804497,0.0063810484,0.00006828358,0.00030218612,0.00050827867,0.8321846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990615,0.00029489293,0.000035487064,0.00008428182,0.0003559833,0.0001678441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984706,0.0005632517,0.00018240963,0.00010225696,0.00032839773,0.00035296907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011966571,0.00088942086,0.0003113505,0.0009923413,0.004663407,0.0067336685,0.001190707,0.003176215,0.065478526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036709097,0.00051633944,0.00033177802,0.0012417815,0.0042497697,0.007826242,0.003524212,0.00370363,0.013416164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018455581,0.000005422558,0.00008784041,0.00011758966,0.0000023842342,0.00007466104,0.002579001,0.000017729966,0.00017731007,0.00699716,0.9684275,0.021494964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004334786,0.0000105884155,0.0006494699,0.00025654555,0.0000042864667,0.00014936867,0.0038598552,0.00002843626,0.00015137605,0.0008659458,0.9940123,0.0000075122935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07407045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15984385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07407045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006272485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044162814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21904749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403925613","doi":"10.1162/ajle_a_00064","title":"JUSTICE IN DIVIDED SOCIETIES Presented as the Horace E. Read Memorial Lecture Dalhousie University Schulich School of Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Law and Equality","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.03291271916360143,"score_gpt":0.33933220523630747,"score_spread":0.306419486072706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403925613","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044389147,0.024620812,0.0007910479,0.543424,0.008847896,0.00005581857,0.00008086089,0.000041866504,0.37774855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7151631,0.014241594,0.00057009415,0.023454955,0.0031605565,0.00007272105,0.000044491866,0.000039435774,0.24325301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774617,0.0009273955,0.00006995693,0.00019138014,0.00035938266,0.00070565444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980229,0.0005646314,0.00007552274,0.00008181155,0.0003909273,0.0008641735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034382183,0.00031090024,0.00051879033,0.00082268694,0.016899822,0.011098794,0.00061079225,0.003708373,0.014710559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006886986,0.00025815555,0.00022015187,0.0005928303,0.011765645,0.004833289,0.006960011,0.0056928503,0.000973803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007055959,0.00020045083,0.0022348687,0.000099884324,0.000022355858,0.0004304658,0.015553241,0.00051135384,0.000220872,0.5435561,0.3794642,0.057635576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051313902,0.000063655054,0.012075891,0.0006228723,0.000027763997,0.00011150267,0.046563312,0.0010888041,0.00040147564,0.33802104,0.60091674,0.00005558954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0786642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18505843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0786642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015098652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018341554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1564126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404022044","doi":"10.7202/1113956ar","title":"Cui, Feng and Li, Defeng, eds. (2022): Medio-Translatology: Concepts And Applications. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 156 p.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Meta Journal des traducteurs","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering","score_opus":0.01897283680379187,"score_gpt":0.311395865757937,"score_spread":0.2924230289541451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404022044","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003102839,0.95631766,0.0019204936,0.016461352,0.0054537887,0.000021946962,0.00048274337,0.00008564513,0.01894599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008476936,0.9124607,0.0053431457,0.003401524,0.006461096,0.00014185341,0.0011155934,0.00021916007,0.062380016],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987331,0.00036219708,0.0001346523,0.00014871628,0.0005170027,0.000104393366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978994,0.00097271154,0.00031953398,0.00011183766,0.00049276906,0.000203795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00235207,0.0017160786,0.0014030207,0.005012993,0.0012501165,0.0050605168,0.0012111103,0.0025332682,0.039397392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004489678,0.0009539397,0.0008404199,0.008597304,0.0021293813,0.008069538,0.0018142634,0.0034718404,0.017206784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007338128,0.00001669166,0.0005176119,0.0025041408,0.000032794076,0.000121067904,0.002061496,0.00013870593,0.00035008884,0.022069598,0.64752525,0.32458916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007755177,0.000019076706,0.0014742835,0.0015824522,0.00002245234,0.0003055194,0.0008828331,0.00010584165,0.00022281363,0.008395588,0.98695856,0.000022652443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013170618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025073469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039397392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034629067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052025425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13179737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404100648","doi":"10.1386/ajr_00163_1","title":"‘What will the lawyers say?’: Australian newsroom perspectives on journalism ethics and naming criminal suspects in a digital world","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Journalism Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Journalism; Media studies; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07218324062579945,"score_gpt":0.3837378254721974,"score_spread":0.311554584846398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404100648","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40771967,0.03190981,0.0036868504,0.42337653,0.0021452883,0.00011467185,0.000034432636,0.00003549087,0.13097735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95768446,0.00638056,0.00081857323,0.027021166,0.00075192977,0.000048933227,0.000010061318,0.00002308215,0.0072613447],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93721026,0.05110951,0.0016861795,0.0015719095,0.0055765533,0.002845599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88478494,0.090215325,0.009366113,0.0017370867,0.00883654,0.0050599347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046493042,0.00030052123,0.00057926105,0.0037570107,0.019119494,0.022134036,0.0018317787,0.009751485,0.0021353108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08370693,0.00074442185,0.00034169402,0.0029085544,0.038073853,0.012363844,0.00746849,0.011203538,0.0004562361],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020373463,0.000039044688,0.0028783258,0.00025190943,0.000009068898,0.0015248917,0.9036409,0.000048549748,0.00030011794,0.07116642,0.006665368,0.013455043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019253697,0.000079164056,0.013356698,0.0015787655,0.00002881768,0.001359528,0.67941415,0.00032418067,0.0003509338,0.030696997,0.27271515,0.000076427044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04562931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0456879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046493042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011789121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015932605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24588162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404107414","doi":"10.1080/00085006.2024.2415820","title":"Law, visual culture, and the show trial","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Slavonic Papers","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Visual culture; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.012267757614230193,"score_gpt":0.27977626444201187,"score_spread":0.26750850682778166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404107414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039496664,0.0045513427,0.0006860133,0.060580924,0.00067954004,0.000011578618,0.000058926194,0.000053406446,0.8938816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8942484,0.0015526246,0.00019611616,0.008123482,0.00020023747,0.000021181313,0.000026870744,0.00007647408,0.0955546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768746,0.0010953203,0.000038421007,0.00017180195,0.0004679923,0.00053901813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711394,0.0013750705,0.0002557148,0.00023298843,0.00045671465,0.00056565437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025080936,0.00020718933,0.00021874497,0.0008598382,0.01256363,0.016334886,0.00084060215,0.0023050923,0.032487985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010323085,0.00017520899,0.00015096417,0.0010161636,0.023080613,0.0049584797,0.0034544624,0.003985746,0.0020869283],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038535967,0.000036216905,0.0007493293,0.000032596286,0.0000057113216,0.00007054502,0.010630066,0.00009891076,0.000098325305,0.9137489,0.057404295,0.01708654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039426643,0.00004032884,0.003621816,0.00041050563,0.000011469989,0.00012280127,0.04535803,0.0003140984,0.0007995958,0.28410402,0.66513413,0.00004380155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053659722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07354227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053659722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074788034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051133535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10868317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404133310","doi":"10.4000/12n3x","title":"The Sound of Justice. Contribution to a Sonic History of the Spaces and Actors of Legal Proceedings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Criminocorpus revue hypermédia","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation","funders":"","keywords":"Sound (geography); Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Acoustics; Sociology; Law and economics; Physics","score_opus":0.03463360343420025,"score_gpt":0.2809571330966734,"score_spread":0.24632352966247317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404133310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016644023,0.23241965,0.005079664,0.19877262,0.017611308,0.000039916275,0.00018828672,0.00017790266,0.5290666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63438624,0.113708206,0.0030787492,0.044199433,0.022644265,0.00010918236,0.00017452883,0.00035976767,0.18133962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970356,0.0013807928,0.000102069105,0.00027134767,0.0008523514,0.00035779484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962429,0.0026278268,0.00021003465,0.00018727354,0.00035114944,0.00038075095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001901766,0.000631581,0.000360768,0.0034176495,0.00875779,0.014943204,0.0010492137,0.006377068,0.012566309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009711951,0.000341574,0.00024209984,0.00199206,0.01860944,0.009187006,0.006467466,0.0062789437,0.001798446],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008265468,0.000051908046,0.00063953205,0.0005373413,0.000019173514,0.0004412201,0.0882338,0.00014856659,0.00059760356,0.55178434,0.19570434,0.16175954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059771555,0.00002269433,0.0007384801,0.00065194425,0.0000059347544,0.0002750579,0.018368684,0.000050147682,0.00022868953,0.046200152,0.9334353,0.000016890957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074344752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016376736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014943204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004261637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003304622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04203844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404584955","doi":"10.21991/cf29481","title":"R v Lufiau, R v Varennes, and The Gamble of Litigating a “Right” to Jury Trials Outside of Section 11(f)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Law; Charter; Political science; Section (typography); Conversation; Supreme court; Framing (construction); Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.03014268201789548,"score_gpt":0.3195374123099204,"score_spread":0.2893947302920249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404584955","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050624564,0.010350221,0.008194651,0.48750988,0.0024867102,0.000086890854,0.00008526202,0.00020377693,0.44045794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7490738,0.0017063925,0.0036873247,0.197743,0.0014638642,0.0002399842,0.000026725553,0.000095647665,0.04596328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98320794,0.0078025167,0.00054869894,0.0024665694,0.0033118404,0.002662573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852652,0.011893846,0.0006937691,0.0006098875,0.00096749776,0.00056985335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019794602,0.00044686327,0.00085239887,0.0015957367,0.012531495,0.010943535,0.0024514825,0.029645491,0.0032095388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035910416,0.0005641758,0.0010820605,0.0007281177,0.026253602,0.005899796,0.0050886315,0.015691876,0.0006457274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016134274,0.000008207091,0.0003044073,0.000018150806,0.0000045929246,0.00017216308,0.0015741056,0.00013908435,0.000069808455,0.9770328,0.01721989,0.0034407869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067966124,0.000115589144,0.002488872,0.0005150439,0.00006042934,0.0006576314,0.0040597767,0.0014225505,0.00089574355,0.6837233,0.30580303,0.00019023397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06938454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.076627664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06938454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0097750565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0153657375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13796139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404842878","doi":"10.1017/9781009209854","title":"The Normativity of Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019832093975464142,"score_gpt":0.2329222263615,"score_spread":0.21309013238603586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404842878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010496302,0.006866497,0.06870778,0.021072907,0.0008626104,0.000059392594,0.00007149133,0.0000924961,0.8917706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8846993,0.0067611877,0.020944944,0.008056,0.0012265653,0.00042426208,0.00010956074,0.00017451597,0.0776037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98791075,0.0069113444,0.00039138555,0.0011953467,0.0029450404,0.00064619957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938153,0.0037384862,0.00042834962,0.00091792253,0.0008882664,0.00021166055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00851712,0.00048582893,0.00055068854,0.0012633373,0.005106902,0.010018304,0.0010148117,0.002339628,0.0030287607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011696669,0.0003143915,0.00047871188,0.0011279903,0.053885113,0.010773087,0.004164051,0.005034083,0.0008103155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012698339,0.0000016249355,0.000033594828,0.000008072083,6.6470955e-7,0.0000062168247,0.00080942654,0.0000508806,0.000022255046,0.9965228,0.00065612025,0.0018871519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002551401,0.0000059910285,0.00009545543,0.000053647054,0.000001753027,0.000023453096,0.00062626996,0.0002515122,0.00008362256,0.94630814,0.052542318,0.0000052784135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047986796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002814332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010018304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057729483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00658259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04504335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404942250","doi":"10.13130/1971-8543/14395","title":"Culturally Motivated Crimes: the Cultural Test in the Italian Jurisprudence. A Comparative Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Riviste UNIMI (Università degli studi di Milano)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Test (biology); Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.06112726520320598,"score_gpt":0.3149123599080145,"score_spread":0.25378509470480853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404942250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5995513,0.017418051,0.00030178795,0.017969033,0.0002876858,0.00007227583,0.00007117783,0.0000051648153,0.36432356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942059,0.0023275968,0.00010188527,0.00081393373,0.00008630604,0.000028784967,0.000024017001,0.000004987639,0.002406617],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920868,0.005472528,0.000172847,0.00030695053,0.0012214268,0.00073936745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960372,0.002110772,0.00065428903,0.00028182977,0.00058752066,0.0003285391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047030905,0.0004094591,0.00035205815,0.003394642,0.008915301,0.005249436,0.0010257995,0.0015084803,0.0026939935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011072468,0.00021772392,0.00030139004,0.0045073614,0.017906869,0.002474367,0.0037218765,0.002002142,0.0002113706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005760534,0.00015152688,0.020898402,0.00030372804,0.000026142214,0.0016355776,0.5278869,0.00013450257,0.00023163357,0.4076108,0.011278171,0.029784966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025972893,0.00020892936,0.18753496,0.0017592199,0.000043814485,0.0025251913,0.5851922,0.00034245546,0.00026559553,0.019178102,0.2028528,0.0000707699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10810164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14269708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10810164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019133449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053257956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21494484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404963605","doi":"10.1007/s10670-024-00889-2","title":"Artworks, Functions, and Pluralism About ‘Artifact’","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Erkenntnis","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Artifact (error); Epistemology; Ontology; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.013677158189161709,"score_gpt":0.2849102858897082,"score_spread":0.2712331277005465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404963605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12898473,0.0042698737,0.076543525,0.03844537,0.00060363696,0.000048080325,0.00011526372,0.00014745392,0.75084203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98432815,0.0003224958,0.0042025037,0.00072539627,0.00017442547,0.000038701208,0.000036178746,0.00009397289,0.010078149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99035573,0.006116446,0.00048013616,0.0011414451,0.0012132685,0.0006929345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881522,0.007579073,0.000721637,0.0024949657,0.00071008253,0.00034203564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011243357,0.00053790945,0.00064979115,0.0034389044,0.0101232985,0.018118773,0.0018964236,0.005816255,0.005343859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012001355,0.00053420255,0.0007757532,0.0024692137,0.10361581,0.019218272,0.005735588,0.005852757,0.00055104267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063639727,0.000003702964,0.00009917649,0.000010860019,0.0000023805453,0.000022208103,0.012617652,0.000052330615,0.00006255054,0.9854145,0.00044019648,0.001268033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008508307,0.000008141183,0.00023717446,0.000043605396,0.000007699938,0.000094495364,0.008295248,0.00019161854,0.00023184475,0.9658058,0.025066327,0.000009479054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038105117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003705517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018118773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004027626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025426669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059461296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405179976","doi":"10.33137/rr.v47i3.44480","title":"Goy-Blanquet, Dominique. From the Domesday Book to Shakespeare’s Globe: The Legal and Political Heritage of Elizabethan Drama","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renaissance and Reformation","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Drama; Globe; Politics; History; Literature; Art; Political science; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.010545194782647007,"score_gpt":0.2817823557289638,"score_spread":0.27123716094631684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405179976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011971022,0.2577921,0.0012622431,0.19913267,0.0077261436,0.000040933726,0.0003437578,0.0001989823,0.5215322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23895924,0.102121525,0.0017175286,0.04777432,0.0025280968,0.00013036563,0.00029654094,0.0007675866,0.6057047],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996239,0.00012735403,0.000008846614,0.0000499298,0.00012511143,0.00006481683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994287,0.0002677493,0.00003767337,0.00002643662,0.0001083859,0.00013102818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045886982,0.0006376472,0.00031712823,0.0011539634,0.008001465,0.0063404804,0.0008442223,0.0027103042,0.012660083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019165976,0.00036785915,0.00022198839,0.0013668948,0.009681662,0.00518548,0.002281827,0.0045055,0.0027314252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039038663,0.000014366904,0.00047611693,0.0002451394,0.0000049941755,0.0006688215,0.08387312,0.000046356065,0.00049598806,0.14761701,0.7288141,0.037704896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031204681,0.0000040130626,0.00052743976,0.00020292033,0.0000017516045,0.00012879164,0.0106178615,0.0000073149436,0.00005023143,0.004444045,0.9840083,0.000004176273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07383656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1772541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07383656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060062227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030783403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14681357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405352794","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4991114","title":"Beyond Judicial Solitude: Listening in the Politics of Criminal Sentencing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Solitude; Politics; Active listening; Political science; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.01708118417812826,"score_gpt":0.31312613911589876,"score_spread":0.2960449549377705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405352794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083307624,0.002023439,0.004901755,0.15768918,0.0008497612,0.000031788415,0.00004133255,0.000034899094,0.75112027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98059916,0.0004773125,0.00028660678,0.006944979,0.00065139926,0.000028494469,0.000009282136,0.000059360395,0.010943504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831509,0.0130940145,0.00021664462,0.0007918703,0.0011834675,0.0015632069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9646571,0.02906833,0.0015680148,0.0007019866,0.0014424471,0.002562221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011881016,0.00034852652,0.0004982708,0.0017928418,0.015057501,0.019501489,0.0013970986,0.008767262,0.019036656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043246515,0.00040298892,0.00029109628,0.0017589219,0.03611569,0.011990122,0.0067667407,0.010709509,0.0012741497],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007802544,0.00006706255,0.0009987856,0.00007599987,0.000011849352,0.00034886468,0.1202671,0.00013649274,0.0003955346,0.8427959,0.016762475,0.01806208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059791793,0.00006637981,0.0037473282,0.00042473502,0.000026227384,0.00026482128,0.15682065,0.0005727072,0.00047086074,0.7137018,0.12378753,0.000057219102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046922727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059642005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019501489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036149397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052817073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06368393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405400592","doi":"","title":"The Naked Truth, A Pictorial View of Justice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Art; Computer vision; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.3359996397976842,"score_gpt":0.5814325975564981,"score_spread":0.2454329577588139,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405400592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004803923,0.01054671,0.017437829,0.24781305,0.004029009,0.000029773808,0.00022454344,0.00010701212,0.71500814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.759998,0.009176321,0.010996578,0.07054095,0.009382842,0.00026346822,0.00014517302,0.0005107085,0.1389859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961713,0.0022163815,0.00010841121,0.0003404584,0.00081061583,0.0003528831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959479,0.0025744182,0.00025588385,0.0004982527,0.0004582622,0.00026527114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039315624,0.00055137236,0.00046789792,0.0020557237,0.008485411,0.016583182,0.0016391067,0.0065164147,0.008867453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0120223155,0.00039263815,0.00040133102,0.0016910713,0.05000877,0.016217884,0.0036788145,0.010814572,0.0014621211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003090036,0.0000014904182,0.000012178038,0.0000087515,5.4399675e-7,0.00001284982,0.0018816019,0.000020314961,0.000016663082,0.987621,0.00954046,0.00088106433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007464666,0.000008217313,0.00008597692,0.00009211441,0.0000031191635,0.000069485606,0.0031685675,0.0001624548,0.0000583463,0.8402109,0.15612389,0.000009337393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074013467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0081753535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016583182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041087545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044986038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029811263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405541972","doi":"10.33675/amst/2024/4/4","title":"The Politics of Queer: Interventions in U.S.-American Culture, Media, and Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Amerikastudien/American Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Queer; Politics; Psychological intervention; Political science; Law; Gay rights; Sociology; Gender studies; Media studies; Psychology","score_opus":0.03409674054915538,"score_gpt":0.37113129976650117,"score_spread":0.33703455921734576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405541972","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05970277,0.02173949,0.0033637693,0.64779025,0.006172309,0.0002123471,0.000076343764,0.00017858107,0.26076406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76950353,0.01778664,0.0017678184,0.16222289,0.002592244,0.00058880623,0.00007386386,0.00012688371,0.045337327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919773,0.005909821,0.00010605855,0.00030928903,0.00043354274,0.001264087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98839194,0.007861426,0.000563029,0.00026661798,0.00072359986,0.0021934675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008281606,0.00041493273,0.00035011015,0.0013067811,0.028307928,0.010599349,0.0016881097,0.0075358306,0.013399587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014630779,0.00025312693,0.0004055554,0.0013933205,0.018897519,0.00967414,0.009400326,0.011758185,0.00084251584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003743051,0.00036481488,0.0021802122,0.00030926938,0.000013260517,0.00047271172,0.2916889,0.00016161862,0.0004576166,0.50275445,0.11872305,0.082836665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003130883,0.00010665494,0.0036934384,0.0012706849,0.00002931934,0.0000978855,0.33361456,0.00025418834,0.00057625223,0.04843491,0.6118525,0.00003817266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048162658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11586608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048162658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010015206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023373624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09576464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405796257","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-75376-3","title":"Criminalisation of Dissent in Times of Crisis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Critical criminological perspectives","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Dissent; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.07980303511181508,"score_gpt":0.37864107645452216,"score_spread":0.2988380413427071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405796257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08715982,0.0018817732,0.0027552808,0.03499101,0.00097109436,0.000056871795,0.000026500686,0.000030465413,0.8721271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9135285,0.00044773138,0.00086253526,0.0034776917,0.00030791794,0.00006482842,0.000019465839,0.000036624777,0.08125466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996687,0.0016838318,0.00007820503,0.00025148297,0.00044577886,0.00085373706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99595094,0.002181738,0.00054740347,0.00029964742,0.00047178578,0.0005484569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039713075,0.00030463684,0.00034678896,0.0011465423,0.007954895,0.0054640975,0.0012290417,0.0051699504,0.0058657667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016371528,0.00020911366,0.00021867156,0.00072440354,0.019720096,0.0049485727,0.0040360433,0.0052414834,0.0007363366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005423757,0.000050029317,0.0013392351,0.000030547413,0.000005744591,0.00079564913,0.05372438,0.00021468385,0.00020079438,0.88320446,0.035193514,0.025186773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026489193,0.00006334623,0.01015445,0.0004950232,0.0000066648618,0.0017183054,0.12535359,0.0015657536,0.0005724843,0.49686056,0.36313587,0.000047323843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065999683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015999204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007954895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020366644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029771363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021002531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405819728","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-75372-5_15","title":"Practical Ethics in a Visual Age: Ontology, Methodology, and a Duty of Care","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media and Culture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Ethics of care; Duty; Duty of care; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.2468271828832613,"score_gpt":0.4926840486780622,"score_spread":0.2458568657948009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405819728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008195464,0.021498159,0.11100046,0.15671982,0.0020629878,0.00015672964,0.0001222197,0.0001581461,0.70008606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7512805,0.00970251,0.059859075,0.021523548,0.0020426388,0.00089575636,0.00014428757,0.00056064565,0.15399107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98233485,0.014645387,0.0003160831,0.00056109927,0.0015534938,0.0005891316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836353,0.012182838,0.00059433817,0.001329797,0.0015276223,0.00073006673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014062656,0.0008096243,0.00076982315,0.0021616204,0.007941968,0.02070416,0.0025239247,0.005903713,0.008848873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023440037,0.00058120384,0.0004337425,0.0022880621,0.09391878,0.016142987,0.006221452,0.008165241,0.0015728448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012817686,0.000005007241,0.000024928064,0.000015278383,4.65519e-7,0.0000073641268,0.0031296778,0.00002690456,0.0000106705365,0.99041474,0.0039114137,0.0024522783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032922105,0.0000041839858,0.000062334875,0.00019148049,0.0000012581655,0.00003640638,0.0070901634,0.00017803472,0.00006743357,0.9073964,0.08496337,0.0000055881064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008632454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010492735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02070416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009255368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014057843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07437134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405948629","doi":"10.61173/0t2qx697","title":"Exploring the Complexities of Freedom of Speech","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arts Culture and Language","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Computer science; Linguistics; Communication; Cognitive science; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06561989884063674,"score_gpt":0.3027183078545791,"score_spread":0.23709840901394236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405948629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049394798,0.026449405,0.08239031,0.12973581,0.0012971325,0.0001402021,0.00012174105,0.00008473039,0.7103858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95186824,0.010854965,0.010408404,0.0056511452,0.001479511,0.00023973636,0.00007282527,0.000118019416,0.01930712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.968617,0.021954665,0.00084794743,0.0017238791,0.004496358,0.0023601586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9457139,0.045705244,0.0022443389,0.0029537706,0.002424531,0.00095815683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01891004,0.00074505596,0.0010167452,0.0025202637,0.012981319,0.025361998,0.002136755,0.007929246,0.0051654787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030001663,0.00079357025,0.0017150465,0.0020579866,0.07475977,0.03138198,0.012636063,0.012280115,0.00083672826],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005714577,0.0000039911724,0.00010737516,0.000035013472,0.0000031135023,0.00012893084,0.0062690247,0.0003529649,0.000047915426,0.989749,0.00071904785,0.0025778853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000077813565,0.000012234137,0.00026101022,0.00030289413,0.000007906308,0.00025426605,0.008907964,0.0010096201,0.00014945221,0.9245745,0.0644805,0.000031925993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007551746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004291133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025361998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010234227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063859634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406108196","doi":"10.1093/9780191991936.003.0015","title":"When is a Sentence a Miscarriage of Justice?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Miscarriage; Sentence; Economic Justice; Psychology; Obstetrics; Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Natural language processing; Pregnancy; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.024574972719880385,"score_gpt":0.28583373812033164,"score_spread":0.26125876540045123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406108196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.420319,0.0478169,0.016947284,0.25209856,0.0093568815,0.00024216197,0.0012222148,0.0003475723,0.25164938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95898336,0.012845684,0.0019842263,0.013243166,0.0016889377,0.00006590436,0.00024904654,0.00011484533,0.0108248135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937144,0.0021385755,0.000951712,0.0005276703,0.0018224872,0.00084516755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840956,0.008257383,0.002993426,0.00039726082,0.0034650615,0.00079120183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004927315,0.00022606226,0.00057473383,0.0021050952,0.0042769006,0.005940509,0.0010811918,0.0034779017,0.0064164214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04316792,0.0003868437,0.0005004119,0.0011880362,0.004133401,0.005985534,0.002252517,0.0047695017,0.0012334461],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004862243,0.00028163864,0.096671835,0.0010877805,0.00015254853,0.021169363,0.06187529,0.001333749,0.0025157682,0.37250462,0.18815264,0.25376853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002668911,0.00032893772,0.1165226,0.007974194,0.00022754361,0.0199886,0.16226614,0.0033724234,0.005373075,0.18500659,0.49852508,0.00038806157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010027912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015805902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010027912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005102916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030683533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03702444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406160813","doi":"10.1017/9781108562058.005","title":"Jurisprudence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.010172105331212457,"score_gpt":0.31819157680473364,"score_spread":0.3080194714735212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406160813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007537511,0.0022177482,0.0009852125,0.008876596,0.0006684781,0.000043473814,0.000067378336,0.00004854172,0.98633885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.073012896,0.0018419734,0.0014006007,0.01645578,0.002354518,0.0002867102,0.00011989074,0.0002072052,0.9043205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932114,0.0023186607,0.00024772837,0.001393659,0.0018783669,0.00095017446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99563,0.0023447697,0.00016833306,0.0007503374,0.0007621625,0.00034431665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00522968,0.0011289712,0.0016525508,0.0023385645,0.012883768,0.015079049,0.00268897,0.017891243,0.057529144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010563544,0.0007922729,0.0008072516,0.0018898093,0.014393818,0.005770198,0.0063405344,0.017604291,0.01839146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025549075,0.000017365155,0.000018182738,0.0000138829455,0.000002218407,0.000033014046,0.00034763466,0.000022041586,0.000035449077,0.96424127,0.03213973,0.0031267165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000177315,0.000011694104,0.00018652844,0.000099012555,0.0000062596305,0.00007709466,0.00035795756,0.00021595023,0.00009708915,0.31088462,0.6880334,0.000012673062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014320463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022348085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057529144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008156796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078263385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19245416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406178337","doi":"10.3138/9781487552978","title":"Freedoms of Speech","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Connaught Fund","keywords":"Speech act; Speech recognition; Linguistics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01839837462411975,"score_gpt":0.2355373010666818,"score_spread":0.21713892644256205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406178337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005545242,0.006804373,0.0046679196,0.007560811,0.0006536077,0.000029328357,0.0000520895,0.00005227757,0.9746342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61077595,0.011170451,0.002735477,0.0038393736,0.001331938,0.0001997461,0.00018869496,0.00018213577,0.36957625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968209,0.0016945241,0.0000952372,0.000307055,0.00073541095,0.0003468509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981504,0.0011544372,0.000088383145,0.00031798653,0.00012399987,0.00016469242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020483413,0.00044364246,0.00034429392,0.0012817786,0.0063592815,0.009092041,0.00061201013,0.0015316206,0.007949105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036712284,0.0002235813,0.0003699862,0.0010467507,0.03304031,0.006870435,0.0048471736,0.003579095,0.0014210255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032210328,0.0000032743974,0.000047327092,0.000019942148,6.9550725e-7,0.000021774,0.0065702433,0.000076218,0.00003581903,0.9792964,0.006392516,0.0075324867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033005545,0.0000067929777,0.00024314888,0.00021372936,0.0000016107049,0.00010493469,0.0061920737,0.00015275595,0.00013025563,0.36946175,0.62347984,0.000009866179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052975263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00515756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009092041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050642756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038024958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036744058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406418258","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5083375","title":"Preface to the Elgar Concise Encyclopedia of Law and Literature, With List of Entries","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Encyclopedia; Law and economics; Law; Mathematical economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.005582195181552619,"score_gpt":0.2645504923551726,"score_spread":0.25896829717361997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406418258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016707279,0.061652474,0.012538486,0.031215137,0.14026415,0.0006164565,0.12842695,0.0053519025,0.6182638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0042076237,0.018099295,0.0047370046,0.0060221753,0.026460856,0.0003302663,0.05650929,0.0022152034,0.8814182],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920326,0.00012620923,0.00012414013,0.00012061981,0.0003740164,0.000051770683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911971,0.0031584732,0.00053318706,0.0006420038,0.0037093256,0.0007600687],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011510098,0.0013872485,0.0017321217,0.012883259,0.0012907825,0.004770366,0.0013930531,0.00095516886,0.51112473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011100071,0.00048798294,0.00036649118,0.014805892,0.0007384964,0.0044354703,0.0016973021,0.0022340242,0.40236166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018501256,0.0000131092,0.00004079434,0.00015810294,0.000002008567,0.000015299775,0.000025303418,0.000023821874,0.00006828425,0.0016530709,0.9808817,0.01710006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006345565,0.000010631028,0.00042390413,0.0002602144,0.000002518364,0.000057127134,0.00006176015,0.000044802156,0.000060665665,0.0021065872,0.9969586,0.0000067869623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00313906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045940313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51112473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015032558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019572228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69732124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406616770","doi":"10.7202/1115574ar","title":"Jonathan Goldberg-Hiller, 'Law by Night'","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Philosophy in Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.033784229403986316,"score_gpt":0.34240821787587356,"score_spread":0.3086239884718872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406616770","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013622124,0.46397787,0.0004969085,0.49473464,0.037551243,0.00001729012,0.00009135201,0.00005220457,0.0029422566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007817357,0.26003075,0.001411287,0.6362781,0.0752209,0.00017046675,0.0001278238,0.00016665008,0.018776715],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98770905,0.005192399,0.0009900075,0.0011204832,0.004391787,0.00059628446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680439,0.02215205,0.0013706565,0.0010959042,0.00575114,0.0015863535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015481908,0.0014183823,0.0022014324,0.006713297,0.0039357063,0.0089541,0.0032711814,0.022540629,0.0056463885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05164005,0.0012227225,0.0009630374,0.0068876576,0.011618977,0.017832244,0.004657879,0.015213855,0.003460757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018466842,0.000012633445,0.00010963924,0.0005179742,0.000023233293,0.00004000541,0.0005593492,0.000026762837,0.000036839567,0.022208845,0.9662998,0.010146406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008106538,0.000016199305,0.0009936568,0.0013622363,0.00003589198,0.00009429611,0.00082663423,0.00006826109,0.00009407461,0.047774613,0.94861764,0.000035380643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03543591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06857802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03543591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077697104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010738475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08187711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406694361","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474455664.003.0003","title":"Reading Faust into International Criminal Law’s Metaphorical References to the Devil","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"FAUST; Reading (process); Law; Criminal law; Political science; Literature; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.05077975152936506,"score_gpt":0.2795423422602989,"score_spread":0.22876259073093383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406694361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012889241,0.02063575,0.004413921,0.029347235,0.00091896154,0.000015121297,0.00003811237,0.00006852256,0.9316732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74741185,0.014075375,0.0030770374,0.010553889,0.00086911174,0.00007183498,0.00008199049,0.00015916191,0.22369982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891067,0.0005921513,0.000017640023,0.00007502063,0.00020071852,0.00020380162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928373,0.0004449372,0.000054764052,0.000042215994,0.000101514386,0.00007287817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089788117,0.0011471224,0.0002307968,0.002881236,0.006391784,0.0052367495,0.000615939,0.0023523609,0.004210117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021037033,0.00019489024,0.00022234957,0.0022484644,0.026723262,0.005835251,0.0022258656,0.0047412333,0.0007688507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005088211,0.0000071146237,0.00008118476,0.000024642824,0.0000013591608,0.00013176493,0.027576793,0.000086661545,0.00008248706,0.9497555,0.017056854,0.0051905815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058650526,0.000018842595,0.0005586768,0.00033252308,0.0000051724464,0.00040321914,0.026022408,0.00026655302,0.00019195542,0.2103577,0.7618201,0.000017013163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020874804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035443723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020874804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007786123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027699168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056492567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407589855","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12945","title":"BeckyBatagol, KateSeear, HeliAskola and JamieWalvisch (eds), The Feminist Legislation Project: Rewriting Laws for Gender‐Based Justice, London, Routledge, 2024, 392 pp, hb, £145.00","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rewriting; Legislation; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.04920755559461061,"score_gpt":0.36013142014116367,"score_spread":0.3109238645465531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407589855","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028510217,0.9666445,0.001496612,0.008148641,0.0030592731,0.00003533443,0.00022624097,0.00014044353,0.019963754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030097791,0.92929435,0.0024607906,0.0016085217,0.0011480139,0.000104641906,0.00042390564,0.0002256963,0.061724275],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829036,0.00047027646,0.00012983281,0.0001737173,0.00078243227,0.00015333011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982266,0.000943035,0.00017528894,0.000081333594,0.0003325651,0.00024116486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032515563,0.0021720787,0.0014060511,0.0031752654,0.002068652,0.0077345716,0.0016659471,0.003192659,0.037106957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035564508,0.0019104633,0.0008938258,0.0069270167,0.0027600704,0.009956083,0.0029624542,0.0053279535,0.027118625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030510404,0.000041562147,0.00024590624,0.0031127275,0.000017952023,0.00010175519,0.0033573245,0.00017397448,0.00025262785,0.008636054,0.6544634,0.32956615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004222447,0.000010437887,0.0007481459,0.0023173948,0.000009955211,0.000114306284,0.0013246648,0.00004777257,0.00010884279,0.0027903283,0.99251103,0.000012940183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029040689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05659161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037106957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003803674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008511291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12413514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407592773","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf006","title":"A common law power to dissect: a medico-legal history","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Royal College of Surgeons of England; Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Law; Common law; Legal history; Jurisdiction; Power (physics); English law; Medical law; Scots law; Sociology; Political science; Sources of law","score_opus":0.015364951499460497,"score_gpt":0.33626761970771357,"score_spread":0.3209026682082531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407592773","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0088650305,0.4770082,0.0023094218,0.34842452,0.0034451592,0.000031215095,0.000031769014,0.00001595452,0.15986873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48382738,0.29353884,0.0020586206,0.17557728,0.011543058,0.00010851795,0.000058325768,0.00006116652,0.03322675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923821,0.0044723973,0.00038433913,0.0007399473,0.0015333702,0.00048770107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833692,0.013529181,0.0007795632,0.00037072567,0.001357123,0.0005942159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011156764,0.00026442762,0.0005338317,0.0039749215,0.0054048183,0.008281873,0.0013468028,0.009047018,0.0024303673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014707524,0.00053645734,0.00031503508,0.003066666,0.044906504,0.010447206,0.0034253579,0.01033927,0.0005294492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010763077,0.00002655709,0.0002499534,0.000161696,0.0000047903777,0.00025928378,0.0077333217,0.000049535323,0.000094869436,0.94549805,0.01897595,0.026935268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025665398,0.00006897707,0.0013954609,0.0015583192,0.000010078724,0.0005647573,0.0041781105,0.000101337035,0.00017572989,0.20072865,0.79116106,0.000031796924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010711494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013507258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011811378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011811378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009816438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08569795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407610367","doi":"10.12697/sss.2024.52.3-4.12","title":"Semiotics continuing to astonish... again and again: A brief survey of the journals Sign Systems Studies and Semiotica in 2023","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sign Systems Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Sign (mathematics); Sociology; Visual semiotics; Art history; Art; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07442097662649921,"score_gpt":0.35850327337929405,"score_spread":0.28408229675279484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407610367","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054703,0.76544076,0.0054579633,0.08744234,0.01836095,0.000045298122,0.00029672252,0.00013567506,0.11735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10766914,0.72854537,0.0060629942,0.02923422,0.021524992,0.00011473009,0.0009733169,0.0002714205,0.10560389],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969072,0.0015399957,0.0003262628,0.00013461986,0.00086321234,0.00022878872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99290425,0.0035525418,0.00038034216,0.00020970003,0.0025381874,0.00041503465],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002310447,0.00049237756,0.00069863844,0.007729238,0.0022475275,0.008605677,0.00039963232,0.0020314422,0.013087121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006974742,0.0003050155,0.000437501,0.01145379,0.004839837,0.009827443,0.0019299726,0.0025926756,0.0048339334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000128398,0.00005590793,0.0018405104,0.0024408149,0.000023287985,0.00022080743,0.0066086883,0.00020884245,0.0013181608,0.26722017,0.34401378,0.37592062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028263114,0.00003394416,0.0018501098,0.0015122442,0.000004866473,0.00027946947,0.002703403,0.000059911148,0.00016301544,0.022865653,0.9705067,0.000017852584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005098125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00818314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99227077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004124987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004573328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043780804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407758357","doi":"10.1111/gequ.70000","title":"A Decolonizing Ear: Documentary Film Disrupts the Archive By OliviaLandry, University of Toronto Press. 2022. pp. 232. $75 (hardback), $75 (ebook)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The German Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Media studies; Art history; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.005921132761701199,"score_gpt":0.2575072530994001,"score_spread":0.2515861203376989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407758357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055973153,0.22360781,0.0005810252,0.16632748,0.012636441,0.00006307832,0.001491221,0.0006651317,0.58903056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031943522,0.0429652,0.00032345962,0.0065942165,0.0018529457,0.000025091485,0.00044828694,0.00030293007,0.9155444],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951637,0.0000921219,0.000019933364,0.00003953463,0.00021935748,0.0001127364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991198,0.0002615718,0.00009070907,0.000057662044,0.00024587262,0.00022430402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089136575,0.0007062831,0.00024570283,0.001042678,0.0056204842,0.0077729784,0.0010107673,0.0027619281,0.09731708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027237376,0.0004615942,0.00020264738,0.0014618079,0.0027982127,0.0046255365,0.0020088856,0.0025012256,0.023841798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014997895,0.0000030111437,0.00008187374,0.000060370152,0.0000013216128,0.00006733492,0.0015289648,0.000011677554,0.00008969956,0.003250507,0.9778842,0.017006166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034093869,0.0000040749796,0.0011487193,0.00021535304,0.0000037848113,0.000063905136,0.0029463933,0.000019373125,0.00008750813,0.00047436423,0.9950283,0.0000047965286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22456025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49508283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22456025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070193093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005455284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44650632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407986013","doi":"10.1017/glj.2024.80","title":"The “Hairs of Hope”: Toward a Fuller Understanding of the Legal, Material, and Social Infrastructure of Infrastructure","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.016940747615069033,"score_gpt":0.28139769687420724,"score_spread":0.2644569492591382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407986013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053601354,0.008325152,0.079402976,0.22913532,0.0006553172,0.00010419694,0.00011869537,0.00015544854,0.6285016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837622,0.0018081457,0.0037191554,0.0037312594,0.00019961012,0.00006234451,0.000026150035,0.000046767676,0.00664453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960995,0.002652593,0.00007070559,0.00026275727,0.0004481094,0.00046638687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954223,0.0028305752,0.00042786184,0.00048610693,0.00036591935,0.00046712952],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055491063,0.0005889398,0.00046060066,0.0035553107,0.0069152866,0.015617348,0.0021368403,0.0055716075,0.0054157767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057469187,0.0005534194,0.00061807805,0.001972043,0.11586675,0.02070882,0.008402089,0.008234314,0.00044523095],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010828503,0.0000022479267,0.00005551177,0.0000074674927,6.575402e-7,0.000018819737,0.0036599583,0.00013012334,0.000009195673,0.9948809,0.0006577949,0.0005761856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033620563,0.0000055681226,0.0002114792,0.000121805686,0.0000023697696,0.00004463856,0.011628107,0.0007297122,0.000036610385,0.94809926,0.03910982,0.0000072416115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014738457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012608631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011187459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006887945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081171095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408038875","doi":"10.1017/cls.2024.37","title":"<i>Centre de lutte contre l’oppression des genres c. Procureur général du Québec</i> : une réécriture queer de jugement","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.00848999542762421,"score_gpt":0.24464285143762335,"score_spread":0.23615285600999913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408038875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25617656,0.009341881,0.0075856587,0.11517149,0.0007177133,0.00014845625,0.00051565457,0.00009003648,0.6102525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9046351,0.0017175362,0.0015382291,0.0039477726,0.000063375475,0.000053227217,0.00008002401,0.000024567025,0.08794012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780875,0.00075014564,0.00004467432,0.0002394495,0.000552915,0.00060406234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968093,0.0006082466,0.00026406176,0.00021450756,0.0015648678,0.00053897477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022930838,0.00029370448,0.00025657774,0.0012263532,0.010648908,0.007058339,0.0011828695,0.0014406102,0.012328345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036024542,0.00019321575,0.00025120308,0.0016492523,0.01432653,0.0021547813,0.0021410903,0.0027212298,0.0004598592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035949826,0.000030364043,0.013989375,0.00014536914,0.000022063214,0.00029138362,0.0784998,0.00041194103,0.000629769,0.81861836,0.042037256,0.04528842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023902221,0.0000569443,0.07118347,0.00076513493,0.000067630244,0.00019514129,0.14764486,0.0011579953,0.0009351061,0.04711236,0.7307542,0.00010332809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97709024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98580104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06916185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06916185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07352491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5018067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408049173","doi":"10.1057/s41284-025-00468-2","title":"Review of Sutton, B. 2023. Bulletproof fashion: security, emotions, and the fortress body","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Security Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Fortress (chess); Airport security; Computer security; Internet privacy; Art; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.00867520357298082,"score_gpt":0.30244711102561883,"score_spread":0.29377190745263804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408049173","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000044884793,0.9805772,0.000073933596,0.010941636,0.0062044095,0.000002759938,0.0000452304,0.000003127542,0.002106832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010022679,0.9802886,0.000100590776,0.010417109,0.005350938,0.000012317676,0.000067276706,0.000008909856,0.00275212],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998863,0.0002822802,0.00017193925,0.0001716095,0.00042900597,0.00008213851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359244,0.0040170248,0.00032036102,0.00011884327,0.0016102967,0.00034102902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025071513,0.0013976716,0.0018557389,0.00612546,0.0012149452,0.0028282218,0.0023142716,0.0050985822,0.007451447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008066378,0.0006423413,0.0006058741,0.0072154184,0.003175489,0.0048198584,0.002252788,0.006769511,0.005743898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057544225,0.000024357907,0.00021263432,0.005493187,0.00004667314,0.00010095927,0.0004268059,0.00011577455,0.000092500384,0.017220367,0.76766306,0.20854609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073806923,0.000014417478,0.0006831163,0.0041005807,0.000021989734,0.00024692842,0.00016201776,0.000015608217,0.000045540328,0.00189902,0.99279034,0.000013069003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012502144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0212129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012502144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004239791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049123256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030762017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408085962","doi":"10.69849/revistaft/th102503021116","title":"DIREITO E OUTRAS MÍDIAS: ASPECTOS JURÍDICOS EXTRAÍDOS DE OBRAS DE FICÇÃO NO CINEMA, NA TELEVISÃO E NA LITERATURA","year":2025,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista fisio&terapia.","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Movie theater; Art; Philosophy; Art history","score_opus":0.015439920354392463,"score_gpt":0.3109597637741838,"score_spread":0.2955198434197913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408085962","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098147355,0.11662667,0.0042044916,0.063459836,0.009022059,0.00015597566,0.00043699722,0.00017576346,0.7077709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81548107,0.037842687,0.0030034091,0.0059625227,0.004672278,0.00020401289,0.00027830977,0.00023356621,0.13232222],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869436,0.00071253243,0.000054840115,0.00016837148,0.00023496177,0.00013482018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973935,0.0018135443,0.00019304185,0.00012336383,0.00029919902,0.00017730116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018245209,0.00052778394,0.00032292842,0.002491264,0.0080131,0.012375477,0.00069342734,0.0017806276,0.011113242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061190245,0.00028500365,0.00021820294,0.0018812483,0.008945548,0.006546375,0.0032562003,0.003344226,0.0012299265],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077662866,0.00003813221,0.0016947399,0.0015422183,0.000014061312,0.0012023563,0.5055968,0.00005531271,0.0018841436,0.30577955,0.106601074,0.07551379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033522617,0.000013834735,0.0020991177,0.0012446721,0.000009310906,0.0006599531,0.094467245,0.00005373069,0.00031322715,0.0043604416,0.89676166,0.00001352787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048532244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011058777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012375477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034838812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019062064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037177563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408092875","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1447","title":"Un-Democratizing the City? Unwritten Constitutional Principles and Ontario’sStrong Mayor Powers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Constitutional review; Law; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.03967969198596153,"score_gpt":0.30378241854892585,"score_spread":0.2641027265629643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408092875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13911033,0.006063488,0.004019677,0.28203616,0.0003767475,0.0001184737,0.00032366137,0.00006268242,0.56788886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95305854,0.0013576775,0.0010434956,0.008164642,0.00012472068,0.000038785,0.00004092237,0.000024104236,0.036147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928584,0.0014484345,0.00020679763,0.00082781794,0.0020791553,0.002579355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946983,0.0016482752,0.00049380463,0.0005152808,0.0014415366,0.0012028796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066669765,0.00018494691,0.00032723407,0.0009173986,0.015101863,0.010077583,0.0015853891,0.0033664526,0.0033179687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008430347,0.00036134367,0.0003179177,0.001257131,0.028113874,0.0028967534,0.0031187125,0.0039727264,0.00026536538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008434652,0.0000073612064,0.002143489,0.00003112711,0.0000074025234,0.0001439715,0.009584454,0.00021730157,0.00021515369,0.9711269,0.010934042,0.0055802814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008133445,0.000029897144,0.027588692,0.00034349744,0.000061995954,0.00016496048,0.022581244,0.0012295875,0.0006997084,0.2804341,0.6666711,0.000113827555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9371424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97998387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06285763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060643565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08196231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44000196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408148098","doi":"10.1177/16094069251321253","title":"The Face as Image: Witnessing, Minimizing Harm and Testimony","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Face (sociological concept); Image (mathematics); Psychology; Internet privacy; Computer vision; Computer science; Sociology; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.3045927726519009,"score_gpt":0.638916693029287,"score_spread":0.3343239203773861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408148098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47349367,0.011057494,0.13584426,0.13170558,0.0032601291,0.0010428046,0.00034751615,0.00017414596,0.24307436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95148796,0.002429269,0.02293491,0.0071596187,0.00031711024,0.00050314027,0.00005207074,0.000088196,0.015027756],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9544101,0.03973015,0.0006629247,0.0011689521,0.0028725083,0.0011554029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9651235,0.026043134,0.002416039,0.0031092511,0.0019843169,0.0013237676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02511842,0.00058725185,0.0005651041,0.0014802149,0.010466019,0.0096186595,0.002045794,0.0050557987,0.0042925486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06919973,0.00044921675,0.0005262017,0.0008209966,0.025732033,0.011293642,0.015254924,0.004681629,0.0008396235],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061829014,0.000055528668,0.0013077781,0.00062304473,0.000020187746,0.0013876813,0.7983268,0.00015693252,0.001965192,0.15314057,0.0066452045,0.036309212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018970008,0.000114513285,0.0008852576,0.0015890485,0.000035465964,0.0026946,0.72724557,0.00053055014,0.0035349203,0.07471698,0.18858817,0.000046016543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012901648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016238921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02511842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024297647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003739708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13284051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408295774","doi":"10.1080/17460654.2025.2468643","title":"Keystone’s mystical sphere: covert transgressions within a disciplinary regime","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Early Popular Visual Culture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mysticism; Covert; Discipline; Keystone species; Art; Aesthetics; History; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Literature; Philosophy; Ecology; Social science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.027158085307211182,"score_gpt":0.36292130478098716,"score_spread":0.33576321947377596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408295774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1041693,0.0062281187,0.017224673,0.04599319,0.00093425834,0.000033913628,0.000050337087,0.00011141951,0.82525474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96001005,0.0012629463,0.0014273996,0.002884964,0.0002512978,0.000047917045,0.000016750608,0.000109352535,0.033989344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961159,0.0018063077,0.00011361243,0.000806012,0.0006946671,0.00046349733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687153,0.0015629311,0.0002487253,0.00076885644,0.00032087005,0.00022715326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039363513,0.0004095493,0.0003951344,0.001376121,0.011102421,0.012180413,0.0011387559,0.0032905014,0.006366348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008539145,0.000327416,0.00030378267,0.001085737,0.06632362,0.016872229,0.009706496,0.007100448,0.0010628459],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058776645,0.0000031558325,0.000085482796,0.000008032781,0.0000010355182,0.000042498723,0.02854896,0.000023887573,0.000063460626,0.96843743,0.0012293654,0.0015508581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014789293,0.000024859386,0.00049357134,0.00020153903,0.0000070071715,0.00029663445,0.03713967,0.0003254591,0.0005549493,0.60491425,0.35599685,0.000030412873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059683574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054513994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012180413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068714563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025667897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049856186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408356502","doi":"10.1163/24680974-37010003","title":"The Argument against the Body-Lover’s Virtue: Phaedo 68d2-69a4","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Méthexis","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Argument (complex analysis); Philosophy; Literature; Epistemology; Art; Medicine","score_opus":0.011498937718516705,"score_gpt":0.2947945142182359,"score_spread":0.28329557649971915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408356502","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026213408,0.006465014,0.007224946,0.18296061,0.0021391765,0.000030092486,0.00007689664,0.00002159994,0.7748683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9384026,0.0014332002,0.0018482303,0.021692527,0.0011484489,0.000074399795,0.000017877197,0.000024242765,0.03535849],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641234,0.0022911655,0.000083600404,0.00028029465,0.0005821337,0.00035050718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702257,0.0016473753,0.00024721932,0.00028705905,0.0004966539,0.00029903985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005482396,0.00024559067,0.00040673206,0.0011611583,0.0041683638,0.0035184363,0.0006945305,0.005361333,0.005002014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007338028,0.00021059533,0.000340711,0.00049446936,0.031813927,0.0037473356,0.0038044741,0.006578441,0.00070200715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066722478,0.000003902871,0.00005997337,0.000011158896,9.319513e-7,0.000031696105,0.00063721824,0.000016027028,0.000022540346,0.99549854,0.0029454995,0.00076589163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003563024,0.000027315946,0.0006030751,0.00032732947,0.000006864762,0.00016401733,0.0018137429,0.00034818132,0.0003026073,0.80941975,0.18693428,0.00001721806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003679238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039868196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005482396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034767732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021373772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028994024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408566841","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5131995","title":"Finding Equality: A Creative Take on Feminist Judgment Projects and the Criminalization of HIV Non-Disclosure","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Criminalization; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Sociology; Criminology; Gender studies; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Medicine; Virology","score_opus":0.02218836869610199,"score_gpt":0.3181338329567192,"score_spread":0.29594546426061724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408566841","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0411738,0.0032880618,0.034829468,0.71958214,0.0018607565,0.000145221,0.00006679812,0.00005283567,0.1990009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94822884,0.0011634799,0.0095688775,0.026714142,0.0009633297,0.00021777595,0.000019265719,0.00012094625,0.013003246],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9317258,0.052053433,0.0014049445,0.0033676166,0.0061445856,0.0053035957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8497235,0.13279082,0.0033895597,0.004860398,0.005866181,0.0033695544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07987659,0.00084058126,0.0013351612,0.0036828807,0.03393774,0.02940542,0.005263538,0.015069974,0.010179675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10549172,0.0007541422,0.000930344,0.0021298018,0.16279322,0.03498891,0.02363882,0.025260922,0.0006354195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013741372,0.00002856362,0.00048585553,0.00004631883,0.000009374225,0.00016898685,0.053349767,0.000110402754,0.00006213805,0.92795557,0.006529066,0.011240272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013766821,0.00001574531,0.00034031738,0.0002796214,0.000010841582,0.00014483082,0.080432035,0.00043409094,0.00033853154,0.8791248,0.038835704,0.000029691982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01553512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024278473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07987659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012004432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02381669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42243284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408615225","doi":"10.7202/1116060ar","title":"Le processus d’affirmation de genre pour les personnes trans au sein du Service correctionnel du Canada","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.007923182141720322,"score_gpt":0.1889771965163049,"score_spread":0.18105401437458457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408615225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6436572,0.006434767,0.003468062,0.11225785,0.0008680691,0.00017581953,0.00047672392,0.000076704455,0.23258476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9295181,0.0018425591,0.0009166339,0.0056063044,0.000050864644,0.000048934668,0.00008302083,0.00003099588,0.06190251],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99329054,0.001164613,0.00014082795,0.0004896603,0.0020066376,0.0029077393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883355,0.0019303279,0.00077153934,0.00036752186,0.0049669095,0.0036282274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040027904,0.00030586403,0.00037571194,0.0013574648,0.032553907,0.0090813115,0.0014253808,0.0023752202,0.010806005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012114861,0.0003116983,0.00032100966,0.001911319,0.011242774,0.002422977,0.0047854786,0.004631925,0.0006305198],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014388857,0.00011565156,0.06622271,0.0002781954,0.00003396983,0.0014248408,0.5283299,0.0003827037,0.0018542849,0.23732997,0.04714982,0.11673402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020865686,0.000075411,0.07161826,0.0007888048,0.00003609967,0.00040519825,0.48414534,0.00037439098,0.0010993872,0.007958737,0.4333463,0.0001310945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98379195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8927891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10721089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2412132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7778731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408694000","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v16i1.17012","title":"Gendered Credibility on Trial","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09285045392967897,"score_gpt":0.41472659513027543,"score_spread":0.3218761412005965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408694000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029767664,0.012675231,0.014787923,0.09283082,0.0020972013,0.00006657126,0.00017437304,0.0000763351,0.84752387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9441543,0.0025092766,0.0016257012,0.010665987,0.0013464612,0.000060120976,0.000045359026,0.000091405025,0.039501302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96061337,0.017057337,0.0014900285,0.005108916,0.011773755,0.0039565368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9337212,0.047293272,0.003071145,0.006847516,0.0072908048,0.0017761468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035252664,0.00030349637,0.0006674019,0.0022924512,0.008147758,0.013728103,0.002162723,0.009632247,0.011588412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10920166,0.00034092937,0.0004874093,0.0019793569,0.03564621,0.010651777,0.00672326,0.009051114,0.0015956295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015218767,0.00000273693,0.00038607005,0.000021111538,0.0000029949786,0.000107261316,0.004744748,0.000076428456,0.000046477227,0.98327214,0.0041970904,0.0071278033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020485162,0.000029413291,0.0011504239,0.00060332107,0.00002108078,0.0002542232,0.0049727233,0.00060085946,0.00051978533,0.71820915,0.27358288,0.000035746933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026100188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02046713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035252664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017871473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015127283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18643612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408720838","doi":"10.1515/9780776645285-025","title":"Droit, technologie et médias","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.04400522027992175,"score_gpt":0.257474984026587,"score_spread":0.2134697637466652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408720838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012272783,0.03724938,0.00036502225,0.0041968552,0.0007382546,0.0000176263,0.00025743435,0.000073832816,0.9558743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03888204,0.021544639,0.0004119121,0.0011644034,0.00038074033,0.00003786318,0.00016883934,0.0000757782,0.93733394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881434,0.00024998578,0.000039148457,0.000134234,0.00049582083,0.00026643556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913543,0.00032942343,0.000069458736,0.00012719701,0.00021188498,0.00012667914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005922847,0.0009370565,0.0003643045,0.0037114397,0.004121582,0.012636866,0.0007816469,0.0016034485,0.041088194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016219073,0.00039745745,0.0002557815,0.00454274,0.008660477,0.0045154244,0.0019895353,0.0020161853,0.01071665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034169916,0.000019976425,0.000421437,0.0003237385,0.000008465055,0.00013392372,0.00914277,0.00017938143,0.00046779116,0.6461299,0.27963537,0.06350298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001452928,0.000003184428,0.0003361573,0.00014452542,0.0000022795484,0.00003422535,0.0010152224,0.000012974715,0.000077763114,0.0043867226,0.99398166,0.0000037430846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29547283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4190391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.978296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02170399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01064928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58750594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408826546","doi":"10.7202/1117039ar","title":"Augustin Simard, Le droit et son autre. Otto Kirchheimer et la critique de l’État de droit, Montréal : Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, 2023, 328 pages","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Philosophiques","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.04009163780401935,"score_gpt":0.31074681801593074,"score_spread":0.2706551802119114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408826546","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003481954,0.88273937,0.00035428855,0.08255232,0.0036369471,0.000008775984,0.0001313643,0.000023559509,0.030205186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0396205,0.7250701,0.0010509966,0.02136142,0.007244303,0.000074274954,0.00026334115,0.00018446644,0.20513067],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859446,0.00043941144,0.00006339284,0.00021453972,0.00052300596,0.00016522549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880195,0.0005011088,0.00012242174,0.000059995727,0.00038947683,0.00012509979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014933428,0.0013496411,0.0009376858,0.0017892997,0.0042526135,0.0048182346,0.0019415683,0.0056959633,0.02630572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034350615,0.0010872781,0.00043940416,0.0041489634,0.006895699,0.0072358935,0.0018772591,0.0051385043,0.0070064096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027612194,0.00001336956,0.00028663722,0.00035312673,0.000012035077,0.00007765336,0.0034320157,0.000079305035,0.00007875965,0.0830279,0.8835532,0.029058428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011776758,0.0000043742048,0.0014155518,0.00056780054,0.000007299869,0.00007232973,0.0013933108,0.000033348308,0.000066425724,0.017683553,0.97872776,0.000016434733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32452092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46267322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32452092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013107892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012043125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.645264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408948335","doi":"10.15215/aupress/9781778290039.020","title":"17. Countering the Legal Archive on the Death of Neil Stonechild: Analyzing David Garneau’s Evidence (2006) as an Aesthetic Archive","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Athabasca University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Art history; Art","score_opus":0.047417194474102066,"score_gpt":0.2668625998483127,"score_spread":0.21944540537421062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408948335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008081941,0.030218339,0.0010550885,0.23979875,0.006620429,0.000045825447,0.00014866133,0.00005243427,0.7139785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32170296,0.02249853,0.0021540034,0.08747414,0.0027468298,0.00012791638,0.00012679958,0.0002386702,0.56293017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966059,0.0011202589,0.00008431795,0.00020648356,0.0014053086,0.0005777548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99461126,0.0030528237,0.00030573425,0.0002131564,0.0014538686,0.0003630679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039294455,0.00044087495,0.00032875375,0.0022504346,0.016340533,0.011775407,0.0013948512,0.0074672066,0.011821184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013803139,0.00028673597,0.00035210192,0.0016316413,0.01973998,0.006476737,0.0037157922,0.0075910445,0.0014217936],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009682977,0.0000052021182,0.00023218898,0.00009422842,0.000004570021,0.00030490875,0.023320112,0.00003939358,0.00008110567,0.6338488,0.32497606,0.017083818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031606862,0.0000044497983,0.0007209127,0.0005213104,0.0000076189276,0.00012235358,0.012270065,0.000023404094,0.00024223725,0.014071804,0.9719964,0.000016175205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2611491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5024934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7388509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0143769495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0174076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51925814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408948746","doi":"10.15215/aupress/9781778290039.015","title":"12. Cookie-Cutter Corrections: The Appearance of Scientific Rigour, the Assumption of Homogeneity, and the Fallacy of Division","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Athabasca University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rigour; Fallacy; Homogeneity (statistics); Division (mathematics); Epistemology; Positive economics; Theoretical physics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Economics; Statistics; Physics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.031448273470672375,"score_gpt":0.2371378652826532,"score_spread":0.20568959181198082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408948746","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010705566,0.0432617,0.004221314,0.4529643,0.14759445,0.00022836076,0.0018879774,0.00080880814,0.34796256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016477687,0.0078483755,0.0034032504,0.08919335,0.011177626,0.00018958413,0.00036515182,0.00064275146,0.8707022],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98849213,0.0018713084,0.00081899716,0.00097224157,0.006850983,0.0009944469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778618,0.006087901,0.0006368352,0.0010497555,0.013691007,0.00067266024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074824686,0.0014977983,0.00091973855,0.002798857,0.012906329,0.0073333303,0.0030531147,0.01056489,0.029946843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03877622,0.0011252133,0.0009949176,0.0026224386,0.01240246,0.004811111,0.003002444,0.0147370715,0.015451182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000081684475,0.0000024872854,0.00003931012,0.000047824244,0.0000020818627,0.000040358944,0.0004602172,0.000016052792,0.000034764253,0.036646448,0.9572886,0.0054138047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000847841,0.0000062279214,0.0006055027,0.0001775369,0.000006203203,0.00010033389,0.00039237586,0.000041898806,0.00014079594,0.0084591,0.9900322,0.000029371706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46668568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64326704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99251753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014312086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024705684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9279385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408985897","doi":"10.5539/ilr.v14n1p1","title":"The Creation of an English Criminal Code: 6 Acts First Act - Sex Crimes Act","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Research","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal code; Code (set theory); Criminology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Criminal law; Programming language","score_opus":0.06966047638504336,"score_gpt":0.45292657004965925,"score_spread":0.3832660936646159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408985897","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102219194,0.01321936,0.009048596,0.2914927,0.029225204,0.0027471285,0.022852218,0.00085644523,0.5283391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24852636,0.006822227,0.022031331,0.14157678,0.0041155615,0.0034319249,0.013845438,0.00045960833,0.55919087],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98249674,0.0031552603,0.002422237,0.0007991622,0.008745505,0.0023810456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9663503,0.009281537,0.0034012734,0.0016185379,0.014027746,0.0053205886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011800264,0.00085236155,0.000951193,0.002400928,0.004431303,0.004399762,0.0020751513,0.009467066,0.007058784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031267863,0.0013446459,0.0010598823,0.00137008,0.0026123952,0.0033956182,0.0050123073,0.01065616,0.0046650427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019571134,0.00035222698,0.010795175,0.000341186,0.000035100355,0.0012173956,0.0065702917,0.0003879633,0.0019660834,0.20370643,0.7322146,0.04221778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105672254,0.0002088754,0.099043176,0.0007715047,0.00005559622,0.00062858604,0.0031997215,0.0005072878,0.0012401693,0.005692306,0.8883219,0.00022528239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16250154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23620902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16250154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005814819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035042427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32311136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409131376","doi":"10.7202/1117376ar","title":"Augustin Simard, Le droit et son autre. Otto Kirchheimer et la critique de l’État de droit, Montréal, Presses de l’Université de Montréal, 2023, 308 p.","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin d histoire politique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.005418183085217227,"score_gpt":0.23872950049578817,"score_spread":0.23331131741057096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409131376","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000360478,0.8683219,0.00019165037,0.10202032,0.0036696906,0.000011337817,0.00014571722,0.000025954503,0.025252854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04888177,0.65259105,0.00094276865,0.046615306,0.006925944,0.00010777099,0.00026351283,0.00025403604,0.2434178],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997849,0.00070635334,0.00009810959,0.00027976662,0.0007973808,0.00026947135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807477,0.0008206873,0.00018013036,0.000078738834,0.000623394,0.00022229833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019255878,0.0017634094,0.00097193307,0.0023906615,0.007072041,0.005332486,0.0028613107,0.0074699926,0.019635506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004192862,0.0011590944,0.00045213092,0.0050701126,0.008906896,0.006725187,0.0018372306,0.00609469,0.005644486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028882367,0.00001233016,0.00030499796,0.00029309664,0.000008982752,0.00010401564,0.0048331628,0.000056625664,0.0000666519,0.041915428,0.93363875,0.018737147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013244093,0.0000045376987,0.001991834,0.0006713742,0.0000060782295,0.00007392896,0.0028269428,0.000026669966,0.000063608335,0.007674482,0.98662865,0.000018556506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6907355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8272723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30926448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023516044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018270478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6221716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409287962","doi":"10.20944/preprints202504.0418.v1","title":"In the Theatre, the People Eat Sweets When the Actors are Poor’: Crowding-Out, Overjustification, Pleasure and the Anti-Delian Reading of the Nicomachean Ethics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Preprints.org","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Reading (process); Aesthetics; Psychology; Advertising; Crowding; Art; Social psychology; Political science; Cognitive psychology; Business; Law; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.12849187081425814,"score_gpt":0.37794797661484947,"score_spread":0.24945610580059133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409287962","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17455593,0.0053704083,0.017306563,0.064687185,0.0005123749,0.00003325064,0.000044417662,0.000036851747,0.7374531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97802836,0.000462744,0.001410302,0.0023010706,0.000049125563,0.000023372224,0.0000064243586,0.0000136848585,0.017705042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729556,0.001918708,0.000035134854,0.00019457929,0.00026334837,0.0002926457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989135,0.000536281,0.00012077219,0.00015381203,0.00020085103,0.000074790754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022681355,0.00024359212,0.00019526372,0.00042279597,0.0049405186,0.0036309871,0.0006010208,0.0021514066,0.0019687028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002979756,0.00014968489,0.00013439503,0.0003506396,0.029506529,0.0027481655,0.0024638271,0.0023223823,0.00026574184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015196634,0.000005858981,0.00042003274,0.00001749629,0.0000020029688,0.00011882147,0.019276774,0.00010801756,0.00017550043,0.9741968,0.0024299584,0.0032336656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000145698195,0.00003235373,0.0035759984,0.00026306423,0.0000061994706,0.00041814515,0.03556513,0.0007623262,0.00098006,0.62838924,0.32994863,0.00004426104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017403578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028010206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017403578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055792034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002037622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040480137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409376801","doi":"10.15406/frcij.2025.13.00439","title":"Forensic justice for marital rape victims in India: deconstructing patriarchal walls through criminal jurisprudence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forensic Research & Criminology International Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Jurisprudence; Criminal justice; Sociology; Economic Justice; Forensic science; Political science; Law; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.12062945053919963,"score_gpt":0.4606641851948821,"score_spread":0.34003473465568246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409376801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52595234,0.026436046,0.008482552,0.28960937,0.0010797553,0.00023978113,0.00004324719,0.000080851736,0.14807616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97518843,0.004635962,0.0015617735,0.014096645,0.00019607523,0.00004687329,0.000010239293,0.000015080428,0.004248749],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99253184,0.0038997943,0.00036798857,0.00032616564,0.0011954241,0.0016789265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934517,0.004207038,0.000729795,0.0004189951,0.0005932852,0.00059911446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007365776,0.00023250209,0.00033138256,0.0021281363,0.017320065,0.009950928,0.0035518527,0.0064831194,0.001697383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013554771,0.00051756663,0.00052239484,0.0013334607,0.0323382,0.0036546339,0.013978716,0.009765858,0.0002698113],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048397877,0.000118307624,0.008465897,0.00040269093,0.00002949609,0.012753732,0.553532,0.00026707273,0.0014448488,0.34685755,0.01305016,0.06302989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021683629,0.00016741586,0.014969329,0.0019759068,0.0000734408,0.01126963,0.698867,0.0005254134,0.0017206598,0.11112608,0.15916398,0.000119368975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016451709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03211612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017320065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005152276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018603215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038954437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409473507","doi":"10.1177/09646639251333976","title":"Relational Legal Consciousness in the Context of Hate Crime Laws","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social & Legal Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legal consciousness; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Hate crime; Criminology; Consciousness; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.047042464762307314,"score_gpt":0.3552864498856021,"score_spread":0.30824398512329476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409473507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96953243,0.000565115,0.0016820629,0.003722723,0.00004743761,0.000036961505,0.000028297805,0.000016478956,0.024368599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983833,0.00016902812,0.00016140763,0.00020432538,0.000005177254,0.000009456806,0.0000069048915,0.00000980715,0.0010505839],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935881,0.0036767018,0.00011324665,0.00038261028,0.00071301847,0.0015263446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99359024,0.0036865263,0.0006022288,0.00032598234,0.00056519324,0.0012298339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005297262,0.00040790509,0.0006813461,0.0015198453,0.025053538,0.010104419,0.0020307899,0.0021237088,0.0035857214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008524157,0.00044813147,0.00028233914,0.001474397,0.056944944,0.007055175,0.01046512,0.005132012,0.00016360692],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038473845,0.000007165432,0.0006557326,0.000011498126,0.0000011441372,0.0002596873,0.992906,0.000010745187,0.00015486393,0.0053401818,0.000073550225,0.0005755251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010043152,0.0000045743514,0.0006501871,0.00002932924,0.0000020147706,0.00009808904,0.9949833,0.000028013153,0.00006787875,0.000713153,0.0034181336,0.000004248033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25774467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31913012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25774467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016051408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020005269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51248884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409671276","doi":"10.1017/sas.2024.5","title":"Semiotic Determinacy: Sovereign Citizens’ Approach to Legal Language","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Signs and Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Determinacy; Semiotics; Sovereignty; Linguistics; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.011803121436077075,"score_gpt":0.28530482957406206,"score_spread":0.27350170813798497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409671276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39336693,0.0015501059,0.07119254,0.037267987,0.00034142568,0.000076103424,0.00005241393,0.00013486895,0.4960176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99743724,0.00008040907,0.0008723416,0.00019770191,0.00002233335,0.000010993011,0.000005930539,0.000011974695,0.0013611147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98733264,0.009436528,0.0003698592,0.0006957064,0.0014820449,0.0006832686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881788,0.0075284466,0.001182982,0.0012600274,0.0012257877,0.0006239718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0125120375,0.0002927696,0.00040491897,0.0029620908,0.008020203,0.01165724,0.0010741436,0.0022470646,0.003098371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012396311,0.0003219137,0.0003289237,0.0017002814,0.08302889,0.009363176,0.008015473,0.00534854,0.00023305784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007643915,0.000008058829,0.0003272562,0.00001163976,0.0000019211182,0.00005635756,0.06689081,0.000080342,0.00013268963,0.9306816,0.00023704169,0.0015646527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020711674,0.00003598101,0.0009921576,0.00016588556,0.000013553275,0.00027578796,0.074668765,0.001553557,0.0009113928,0.8614736,0.059858866,0.000029816958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042068656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003532353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0125120375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007260688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049114265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06617081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409787869","doi":"10.1007/s43576-025-00168-2","title":"The Influence of Extra-legal Factors and Nonverbal Communication in Virtual Trials","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Criminology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University; International Centre for Comparative Criminology","funders":"","keywords":"Nonverbal communication; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.07661752414081299,"score_gpt":0.3826504121601671,"score_spread":0.30603288801935413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409787869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.984204,0.00016566765,0.000405236,0.00015947805,0.000022886292,0.000018546545,0.000027146802,0.000008395319,0.014988686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926466,0.000048437123,0.00012720606,0.0000213146,0.000012095361,0.0000134302,0.000011022987,0.000008678096,0.00049314986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98570627,0.011264623,0.00058632746,0.00055542553,0.0013794329,0.00050794746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82996625,0.14485173,0.013067054,0.0036691152,0.0036038691,0.004841994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046019843,0.00028463054,0.00034788233,0.0009052554,0.0014214518,0.0068757306,0.0007201064,0.00089628575,0.008394405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14835557,0.00019796248,0.0001780885,0.0006352573,0.0018428611,0.0024563826,0.0015409735,0.001051418,0.0006579558],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011506081,0.005799749,0.6286114,0.00080876745,0.0005192492,0.0062458306,0.10280885,0.005841063,0.015385916,0.021985838,0.0036725644,0.19681467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032703247,0.0020953764,0.8843054,0.00047282354,0.0003679226,0.0030853793,0.06613736,0.0118339155,0.0036974798,0.020122673,0.007340075,0.00021456253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029537769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027978455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008394405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070887926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011019161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028082013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409797326","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5191049","title":"It is Our Flaws That Make Us Humane: How Technology Ruined Judicial Craft","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Craft; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.010818383218626902,"score_gpt":0.2938951342438782,"score_spread":0.2830767510252513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409797326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18235928,0.0029486138,0.04596727,0.18779491,0.0017203444,0.00008577479,0.00018927542,0.00044151244,0.5784931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96415365,0.00035605417,0.0026217322,0.007903906,0.00019630183,0.00003907416,0.00002557524,0.00026845408,0.024435308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863201,0.0077991365,0.0003355506,0.0017886034,0.0019182535,0.0018382502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707451,0.018135764,0.001512075,0.005242845,0.0031870855,0.001177211],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015208012,0.00047430987,0.00052689854,0.0025506553,0.014582956,0.024423426,0.0024455215,0.014169215,0.010971187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05722672,0.00074073434,0.000685218,0.0018536618,0.070062146,0.030809075,0.008871519,0.014064228,0.0022870176],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022927585,0.000020775982,0.0011114795,0.000020998481,0.000008856164,0.0003380291,0.06362911,0.00018614104,0.00017338476,0.9145367,0.011832647,0.00811882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003216334,0.000036052406,0.00069650315,0.00030185876,0.00002931473,0.00048170052,0.037973948,0.0011620547,0.0010734876,0.722065,0.23606229,0.00008560613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016344083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015092085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98541707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077164234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009524946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0804286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409821449","doi":"10.1111/area.70019","title":"Research methods for legal geography","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Area","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Geography; Human geography; Regional science; Economic geography","score_opus":0.10115780246652532,"score_gpt":0.529331722452386,"score_spread":0.4281739199858607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409821449","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014964101,0.010116357,0.8991204,0.012359509,0.0012008877,0.0030340927,0.0014895616,0.0006905114,0.07049234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041184235,0.006127249,0.9320625,0.0013863161,0.00052174757,0.011306601,0.00072574447,0.00029313724,0.006392462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8693657,0.11341712,0.0053698304,0.0040574833,0.0070459526,0.0007439404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7477812,0.21501023,0.0054820445,0.021374257,0.00938174,0.00097047037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0968755,0.0017785642,0.0023009214,0.013249733,0.0033727747,0.012326674,0.0036831987,0.003369489,0.023237033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12145855,0.0012206569,0.0022293811,0.0134698795,0.018956158,0.011599975,0.006813244,0.0066493093,0.0046888515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015921423,0.000024182023,0.00026879628,0.0010674748,0.000050722727,0.00007218434,0.0039788573,0.0005844242,0.00013087498,0.941712,0.0064094933,0.045685094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042130665,0.000038267124,0.0004147634,0.0025250488,0.000032221105,0.00015717,0.0036956216,0.0019235368,0.00020784423,0.7902402,0.2006901,0.000033109918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002548223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001882942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0968755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006360312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008626087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5123328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409910929","doi":"10.1017/cls.2024.31","title":"Special Issue 39-3: Person-Centred Justice: Reimagining Law, Institutions, and Process","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Process (computing); Sociology; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.028294328053562405,"score_gpt":0.2955305951272491,"score_spread":0.2672362670736867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409910929","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016002017,0.05730032,0.0013851947,0.671625,0.17701478,0.00017841668,0.00045384967,0.0003615939,0.09008066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04319781,0.059202313,0.0030395915,0.25751776,0.31089815,0.0004256409,0.00077557826,0.0010024871,0.32394063],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98662657,0.001248274,0.00065171334,0.0012428757,0.0072701555,0.0029603816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845643,0.0045031365,0.0005451607,0.0012213835,0.005941123,0.0032249151],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0122398855,0.0015050224,0.0022562183,0.0028010882,0.015445167,0.02262907,0.007098236,0.02714194,0.031069214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011912967,0.0010678708,0.001678216,0.0031863584,0.026665246,0.011612392,0.007779631,0.020907657,0.0053665275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013847029,0.000025633306,0.00023958228,0.00021664282,0.000007703667,0.00017436416,0.0010633591,0.00007698552,0.00011750796,0.03734542,0.9478318,0.012887142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005818298,0.000010796227,0.000989351,0.0003659265,0.0000109128905,0.00014812592,0.00088609767,0.00012517854,0.000076131415,0.008884403,0.9884702,0.000027064685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59094507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70895046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59094507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050384864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10525665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8229279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409923824","doi":"10.5771/9781611477061","title":"Framing Law and Crime","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.016750023954602494,"score_gpt":0.282449713170915,"score_spread":0.2656996892163125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409923824","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008463172,0.023252523,0.0048331628,0.04260666,0.00842197,0.00009336051,0.00032959285,0.0001636618,0.91183573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3409731,0.032845795,0.0067513194,0.013654875,0.008368283,0.00035378395,0.0007104528,0.0005273905,0.595815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877065,0.00074541214,0.000033141732,0.00013873856,0.00020563939,0.0001065057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990984,0.00054506195,0.000047392503,0.000084354884,0.0001401693,0.000084601415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007983532,0.0005814415,0.00029568127,0.002104336,0.0049221744,0.00883378,0.00077887834,0.0013984186,0.01861805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003043157,0.00016811922,0.00022488931,0.0015065409,0.008477059,0.004041149,0.0027896224,0.0025137223,0.0016512705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012043067,0.000021136442,0.00031869044,0.00017567327,0.0000042585584,0.000120699326,0.026367554,0.00016567914,0.0001672626,0.7009834,0.20707743,0.06458627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021349244,0.000008203608,0.0003592076,0.000338993,0.0000028337663,0.00006752085,0.01002798,0.000110777546,0.0001276346,0.037112113,0.9518373,0.000005279088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01149975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01821065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01861805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050648474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029860924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062283576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410496679","doi":"10.15173/ijsap.v9i1.5939","title":"Showcasing Street Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Students as Partners","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04047060682802709,"score_gpt":0.5600440699546183,"score_spread":0.5195734631265913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410496679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32727775,0.0010899964,0.04726741,0.058467407,0.0017902358,0.0005166151,0.0003785634,0.003550581,0.55966145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86187637,0.0010558291,0.017266,0.004478535,0.00043330787,0.00016203744,0.00017792157,0.0005668325,0.113983184],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947491,0.0027270294,0.00012488352,0.00026436956,0.0015756275,0.00055893796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99015194,0.005732081,0.0007823894,0.0009377568,0.0012837519,0.0011121199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004542697,0.00043579316,0.00025773744,0.0010870068,0.0045075947,0.0050464817,0.00155593,0.0028552618,0.027407005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018884284,0.0002779721,0.00038108713,0.0006239197,0.0056263474,0.005175466,0.006827294,0.0038333773,0.0035272175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007733948,0.0003976309,0.0058081863,0.00053995964,0.000020645675,0.0060840654,0.34501818,0.0010741052,0.010401678,0.1288892,0.22856225,0.27312678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013977903,0.000289124,0.004046176,0.0004515493,0.000012557763,0.0031575966,0.07537644,0.0019112163,0.007860386,0.0200074,0.88681996,0.000053538082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026049723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060188784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027407005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002020792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018658184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09168559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410546480","doi":"10.1017/cls.2025.5","title":"<i>Centre de lutte contre l’oppression des genres c. Procureur général du Québec</i> : une réécriture queer de jugement – CORRIGENDUM","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"erratum","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Queer; Humanities; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science; Gender studies; Politics","score_opus":0.011471827388475806,"score_gpt":0.2414694248313006,"score_spread":0.2299975974428248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410546480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032428564,0.06866354,0.0013991729,0.29187047,0.1668277,0.00021060143,0.009338242,0.0009811681,0.45746619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024067562,0.012911607,0.0014568891,0.018743752,0.0062969876,0.00011579547,0.00199721,0.00040494025,0.9340053],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980369,0.00021206439,0.000101431826,0.00017983397,0.0010732188,0.00039641597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939861,0.0006161921,0.00016733466,0.000225616,0.004505182,0.00049947324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018430364,0.0010331189,0.0009279237,0.0026902861,0.0076562096,0.0057211933,0.0018212107,0.0052585946,0.09986351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006510167,0.0005605889,0.0008714587,0.0032015946,0.002447932,0.0023597225,0.0011460792,0.0059014945,0.016556203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006492587,0.0000036449753,0.00015880633,0.000051447147,0.0000025901722,0.000033887067,0.00013528057,0.000016752918,0.00002790429,0.004291828,0.9903467,0.004924696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056135873,0.000005875907,0.004023151,0.00018152267,0.000008434084,0.000050566003,0.0005456061,0.00006596724,0.0001194059,0.0008783394,0.99409145,0.000024138133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9626469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97473496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09986351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050300885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043935977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36496013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410591222","doi":"10.4324/9781003528357","title":"Storytelling for Crime and Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Victoria Park","funders":"","keywords":"Storytelling; Economic Justice; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Narrative; Art; Law; Literature","score_opus":0.03023085377885302,"score_gpt":0.3202989967399877,"score_spread":0.29006814296113465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410591222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003730093,0.015948344,0.0068231137,0.009517793,0.0016105797,0.00007021308,0.00011483256,0.0003096425,0.9618753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.106444284,0.01864021,0.00933568,0.0040264037,0.0008815093,0.0001821439,0.00040588554,0.00034411123,0.85973984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940634,0.00029028498,0.000018760009,0.000044028187,0.00018023519,0.00006043672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936646,0.0003728882,0.000046462883,0.000064324384,0.00007174822,0.00007818603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046556533,0.0005367985,0.0001971012,0.0010288894,0.0027510514,0.0057484857,0.0006852305,0.0012273308,0.028002463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018313358,0.00017447644,0.00031999336,0.0009935574,0.0033436045,0.0038695985,0.0023495818,0.002130801,0.00417281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018277617,0.000029849669,0.00022360601,0.00026302843,0.0000073687143,0.00024479284,0.017239762,0.00027689541,0.00041108622,0.446463,0.38793594,0.1468865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002789954,0.000009261462,0.00025600544,0.00022750668,0.0000022407992,0.00026150272,0.0035351233,0.00014344302,0.00014376624,0.02178455,0.97362876,0.000005051116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021299305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005435008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028002463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013303232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014031911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09367758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410608910","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-69594-0_28","title":"Part 6 Introduction: Memory, Literature, Law and Justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Criminology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01356692200447928,"score_gpt":0.26443403051362796,"score_spread":0.2508671085091487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410608910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044190718,0.07773611,0.0023586766,0.00911285,0.013439301,0.0000926264,0.0006882618,0.00019631986,0.8959339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003496794,0.02452096,0.00096921175,0.0026873094,0.005151487,0.00007635064,0.00049636274,0.00017697811,0.9624246],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999762,0.000052787902,0.000013462217,0.000037598486,0.000109531575,0.000024627489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995402,0.00021788468,0.000020236226,0.000037271762,0.00013653078,0.00004787099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043299457,0.0008931107,0.0007349212,0.002069559,0.0018592045,0.004640112,0.0009891451,0.0018211347,0.17603281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014033214,0.000344215,0.00050463097,0.0023663626,0.0016855483,0.0034965286,0.0012033078,0.0030999796,0.048019756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011589362,0.000035729492,0.00004354555,0.00024813486,0.0000022164104,0.000034239165,0.00039517652,0.0000907614,0.00016074769,0.107274145,0.8361294,0.055574313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012408999,0.0000058249266,0.00009433574,0.00021320424,0.0000013397943,0.000040114486,0.0001360636,0.000025644664,0.000037191585,0.016243858,0.98319846,0.0000027331175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044276486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008787014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17603281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019072844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019583437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5888884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410658555","doi":"10.5040/9781683935438","title":"Vigilante Justice in Society and Popular Culture","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Sociology; Criminology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.017703646795462588,"score_gpt":0.2864728780885643,"score_spread":0.2687692312931017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410658555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010458539,0.01282604,0.00037278165,0.020714175,0.00095727714,0.000011481299,0.000050232018,0.00003679812,0.9545728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45348293,0.024662722,0.0004925377,0.008649873,0.0027868205,0.00007679951,0.00011969533,0.00012709414,0.5096016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947983,0.00027079895,0.000010478987,0.000032641154,0.00015499567,0.00005132051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950874,0.00027318907,0.00005276074,0.00003093287,0.000073299736,0.00006113183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031975764,0.0003004055,0.00018038574,0.0007211593,0.0033857808,0.006235184,0.0004109461,0.00092491636,0.0076222704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011357891,0.00010101553,0.00012907098,0.0016463231,0.0056147547,0.0030507413,0.0016861799,0.0014173872,0.0013654584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008257565,0.000031463096,0.0010295478,0.000118591444,0.0000053109675,0.00019308696,0.040538814,0.00014801965,0.0001666623,0.6134195,0.292004,0.052336834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029265582,0.000015242973,0.0024486023,0.00023246117,0.0000039443767,0.00020406622,0.01792497,0.00015391686,0.000102729515,0.045153394,0.933749,0.0000087225035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005745227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010839978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076222704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017764491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014002717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025499046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410840708","doi":"10.1177/02637758251345266","title":"Cemetery as archive: A critical legal geography of two chronotopes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning D Society and Space","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Anthropology; Sociology","score_opus":0.012323931263920423,"score_gpt":0.28074737024279645,"score_spread":0.268423438978876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410840708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29846415,0.010705266,0.011037717,0.05536939,0.00070139224,0.00028221193,0.00037360523,0.00014185393,0.6229244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811763,0.0017134486,0.0018703131,0.00069740455,0.00009732602,0.00009068322,0.000049563467,0.00007705366,0.014227942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948172,0.002954377,0.00012915503,0.00037536694,0.00073770725,0.0009861265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99295276,0.003786384,0.0007783379,0.00074725854,0.0008299611,0.0009052018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055829873,0.00046715522,0.0005301696,0.005460647,0.036973514,0.030239258,0.0029417858,0.004908046,0.007919919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011883065,0.0006496806,0.00030949432,0.0069169113,0.09946325,0.017590655,0.010999235,0.005334472,0.00031441188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016680744,0.000009650097,0.0004922028,0.00003891523,0.0000017325413,0.0004861457,0.36641565,0.0000572727,0.00008788445,0.6275611,0.0018577862,0.0029749433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001174186,0.000019894112,0.002603419,0.00036803918,0.000008824104,0.00041292797,0.6798887,0.00019094332,0.00023532458,0.05492716,0.26130426,0.000028688613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33648038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48775473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33648038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057615813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029335242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66904366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410865059","doi":"10.1111/raju.12426","title":"Reflections on Complexity, Evidence, and Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ratio Juris","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Political Science Association","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Law; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1190413797807385,"score_gpt":0.43615835112265344,"score_spread":0.31711697134191497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410865059","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0060771597,0.011620978,0.008806861,0.89608765,0.0015802198,0.00003440521,0.000089278976,0.000021067295,0.07568249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8297554,0.01367156,0.013139828,0.11963096,0.009394199,0.00024075204,0.00010196697,0.0001169268,0.013948415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96237457,0.025840344,0.0010559962,0.002128064,0.0069924383,0.0016086004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8156809,0.16916442,0.002726743,0.003963846,0.0064442703,0.002019769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04359347,0.0006867269,0.0016118576,0.0063487566,0.008140379,0.020217355,0.003368658,0.018142134,0.007225752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08837473,0.00069559034,0.0013171975,0.0034096374,0.11049941,0.034000292,0.013321381,0.027878776,0.000573092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036159593,0.000003651723,0.00004091938,0.000021110489,0.0000030158722,0.000036351506,0.0008426703,0.00013542014,0.000014093967,0.99495256,0.0030840947,0.00086259603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000111236195,0.0000045612287,0.00007809523,0.0001430012,0.0000030160738,0.00003504874,0.0009790615,0.00028587112,0.000042798692,0.9656912,0.032715976,0.0000102349595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009188647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054126703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04359347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021222744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010841666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23054707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410977587","doi":"10.53103/cjlls.v5i3.217","title":"Culture and Citizenship, the Role of Law and Literature in Critical Thinking in Society: English Language and Wider Society","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Language and Literature Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Sociology; Law; Political science; Social science; Politics","score_opus":0.007931428734222049,"score_gpt":0.29416491137702766,"score_spread":0.2862334826428056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410977587","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11195871,0.20830487,0.009908642,0.22426625,0.0025791083,0.00007811791,0.000060318347,0.000075977914,0.4427681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95949703,0.023972804,0.0015653396,0.004703053,0.00086995907,0.000076018056,0.00001662722,0.000044661956,0.009254464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99085957,0.007190313,0.0002926773,0.0002341807,0.000731288,0.00069193286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975747,0.019008398,0.001468789,0.0006380199,0.0018704204,0.0012674716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008711635,0.00047253363,0.0006103686,0.004504662,0.010342717,0.021642901,0.0011824347,0.0026510328,0.0023802514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015317491,0.00027292737,0.00027979934,0.004913529,0.05948371,0.013687559,0.0046614753,0.0031456891,0.00032119176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010640128,0.000018198227,0.0009180827,0.00018943756,0.000006971042,0.00025966734,0.13093431,0.00009198271,0.00010783434,0.85227734,0.0049556284,0.010229824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010600623,0.000038074686,0.0023623623,0.0014690906,0.000015710466,0.0003056691,0.21975791,0.00033058747,0.00026830423,0.57248205,0.20291948,0.00004022489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017411474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024119297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021642901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010730293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01092193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0778541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411063282","doi":"10.29173/jjs114","title":"Class Acts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Juvenilia Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics","score_opus":0.03796198325591147,"score_gpt":0.3886835195219224,"score_spread":0.35072153626601094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411063282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018222043,0.00021858694,0.0014507147,0.0015324983,0.0009342992,0.0001879669,0.001121896,0.0003189637,0.99241287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0248804,0.00023166566,0.00094853423,0.00093502185,0.0002225607,0.0002527093,0.0010257417,0.00019174554,0.9713117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969555,0.0006749196,0.00019077655,0.0006368744,0.0009849031,0.00055711914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99805546,0.0003982752,0.00014430172,0.00056377944,0.00051134086,0.00032687947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018933222,0.00089433184,0.00069361896,0.001576413,0.0055508437,0.0063522286,0.0020240778,0.0023316392,0.47112766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005586997,0.000366083,0.00059814774,0.0010526594,0.0015151897,0.0033640938,0.0043750233,0.002490303,0.27314928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011511575,0.00012464418,0.00077116134,0.00013971033,0.000006488852,0.00023325362,0.0040236632,0.00009201895,0.00036468654,0.34887525,0.52770835,0.11754573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005745861,0.000010127516,0.00027700452,0.000042890802,0.0000012042095,0.000046528763,0.0005235869,0.00003104507,0.00009435703,0.004098692,0.9948645,0.000004331408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00446089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057159606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47112766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026076708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018727899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411238674","doi":"10.35502/jcswb.458","title":"Decriminalizing public space governance: The role of the police","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Community Safety and Well-Being","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Public space; Space (punctuation); Public administration; Political science; Business; Computer science; Engineering; Finance; Architectural engineering","score_opus":0.01181330791679423,"score_gpt":0.27826864917888,"score_spread":0.26645534126208575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411238674","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2904902,0.014126871,0.01911166,0.30236843,0.0017646172,0.00031545907,0.000059357517,0.00020219959,0.37156117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821592,0.0042842296,0.0020773031,0.0042106807,0.00026192504,0.00007569369,0.00001192218,0.000028676654,0.006890442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99330854,0.003947902,0.00018091741,0.0003405561,0.00077072403,0.0014512874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98466575,0.0076111304,0.0022385188,0.00093067746,0.0023621,0.0021918342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007434239,0.00033912022,0.0002719287,0.0029092333,0.010183375,0.013640338,0.0017079341,0.0027243167,0.0046227463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01665997,0.00041974615,0.00028690114,0.0017516812,0.01813886,0.0088815745,0.008432212,0.003995983,0.0005019385],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000773404,0.0003994815,0.034547254,0.0005482993,0.000060344417,0.0008324945,0.10064232,0.0010790718,0.0012433836,0.5146865,0.032165226,0.3137183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006824576,0.00033464195,0.031128757,0.0033886172,0.00010371391,0.0006647995,0.35052785,0.003313074,0.0024099275,0.2071586,0.40078056,0.0001212194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017854357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030804325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017854357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053919815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022804575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039316475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411508607","doi":"10.1007/s10978-025-09423-x","title":"Laughing at Law: A Case for Comic Jurisprudence in the Climate Crisis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Critique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comics; Law; Appeal; Jurisprudence; Sociology; Philosophy of law; Harm; Indigenous; Shame; Laughter; Political science; Comparative law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.013074781355139963,"score_gpt":0.34882305874746244,"score_spread":0.3357482773923225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411508607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1584833,0.0022341528,0.022454225,0.2140988,0.0016695556,0.00015041126,0.00004403339,0.00018269305,0.60068285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97916085,0.00019126713,0.001142368,0.007915236,0.0002863461,0.000067307636,0.000008814018,0.000105335115,0.011122503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9712673,0.021794476,0.0003724462,0.001768593,0.0022303807,0.0025668438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683436,0.021986976,0.0017959293,0.0026714772,0.0025982847,0.0026036229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018906571,0.0007682607,0.0006549691,0.002604409,0.04113391,0.027709646,0.0038208228,0.015988324,0.006706604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03265183,0.0006602637,0.00056807674,0.0020219705,0.15482534,0.0154660735,0.017285705,0.019976271,0.0009496372],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000118008265,0.000021341613,0.00021879462,0.000025017756,0.0000032271391,0.00055637734,0.28047636,0.000059603575,0.00015379509,0.71236014,0.004250563,0.001863048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003361394,0.000028679558,0.00057756033,0.00035459915,0.00000986093,0.0006065128,0.39496917,0.00089161046,0.00058005896,0.33891413,0.26298493,0.00004924093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01906885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019851603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04113391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015301835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007108874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11102313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411656361","doi":"10.51847/ervcffkdkv","title":"10.51847/eRVCFFkDKV","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Broadcasting (networking); Telecommunications; Business; Computer science; Political science; Advertising; Computer security","score_opus":0.008777804003294325,"score_gpt":0.22302613046721292,"score_spread":0.2142483264639186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411656361","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00069959223,0.00032964497,0.00053455855,0.00052247796,0.00036109833,0.000040214047,0.0010629147,0.0005894265,0.99586004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037775566,0.00025363866,0.0003794731,0.00026358606,0.000057112393,0.000020267566,0.00089477666,0.00022586773,0.99412775],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994917,0.00005438268,0.000047920283,0.00013265885,0.00018243323,0.00009093065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895227,0.00020722054,0.000045018827,0.00023495902,0.0003562145,0.00020433422],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068927876,0.0007940381,0.00055989024,0.0019460818,0.0013770583,0.0036703688,0.00096832874,0.002790145,0.95842105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001622536,0.00037089825,0.00036219103,0.0016144334,0.00090623536,0.0028511754,0.0025746822,0.0012366629,0.95680404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016323756,0.00016118874,0.0011580383,0.0003368175,0.000012111139,0.00027759807,0.00011812395,0.00030069618,0.0015640354,0.013457199,0.47137228,0.5110787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019841227,0.000019076848,0.0007392923,0.00014378394,0.0000041876306,0.0002483357,0.00009393688,0.000156136,0.00032832436,0.0012230526,0.99701166,0.000012345961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004181432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034750719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04157895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012164355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008132096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059307337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411658389","doi":"10.51847/he39gd3","title":"10.51847/HE39GD3","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commissure; Orthodontics; Biology; Mathematics; Geography; Anatomy; Medicine","score_opus":0.008510934462365791,"score_gpt":0.2226546141429211,"score_spread":0.2141436796805553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411658389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022144981,0.0006647595,0.0020721657,0.0008568994,0.00072596676,0.00011951038,0.0012898115,0.0012443486,0.990812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003930538,0.00023895537,0.0010019339,0.00040842273,0.000088003566,0.000048380247,0.0006528662,0.000195628,0.99343526],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927133,0.0000742329,0.000056117253,0.00022654109,0.00022759415,0.00014409552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985971,0.00031691007,0.00007694799,0.00029204812,0.00042205155,0.00029501086],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008736469,0.0012193937,0.0006411695,0.0020183146,0.0012706006,0.0028749066,0.0012233165,0.003033686,0.96312237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00140802,0.00042424837,0.000531106,0.0018231873,0.0009629889,0.0023715938,0.0028832243,0.0010867785,0.96119946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030997346,0.00022983199,0.0018958222,0.00029215473,0.000021896793,0.00036551675,0.00013073682,0.00037266675,0.0038405762,0.005940221,0.2194985,0.7671022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003936864,0.000070637856,0.0019717172,0.00018697465,0.000012161967,0.00045935152,0.00014224958,0.00033732137,0.00092580565,0.0015314932,0.99429905,0.000023905583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034551322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003080135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036877632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008979984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063835556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052601397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412012921","doi":"10.1080/28325281.2025.2525842","title":"Iris De Freitas Brazao: legal luminary and trailblazer, Caribbean, Canada, Wales, England, 1896-1989","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Black Histories","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"IRIS (biosensor); Geography; Cartography; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.00884621997724107,"score_gpt":0.23945725346681634,"score_spread":0.23061103348957526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412012921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020891616,0.3266284,0.0002761112,0.10075729,0.004548989,0.00011288174,0.002475803,0.00005773556,0.5442512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15491675,0.11355143,0.00054810965,0.009301673,0.0011617177,0.00014332985,0.00056850363,0.00011371373,0.7196948],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990107,0.0001650184,0.00003957783,0.00010948361,0.00036669464,0.0003085903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885213,0.00023594678,0.0001370126,0.000033043725,0.00042497728,0.00031687188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011285841,0.0005898432,0.0004352742,0.003014839,0.021249024,0.0055841524,0.0010667274,0.0028238331,0.029667119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038991058,0.0006156059,0.00020635617,0.008133071,0.007034478,0.0036817712,0.0027986278,0.0045605754,0.002058494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045109628,0.000026914055,0.0025417337,0.0003095528,0.000007569697,0.00045889465,0.09974114,0.00007114664,0.00011210746,0.15146118,0.69486284,0.050361846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001826552,0.0000018913785,0.003977599,0.00024095709,0.0000017374531,0.00006233518,0.0099770455,0.000004381395,0.00002495145,0.0006938687,0.9850054,0.000008095815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9678449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98970807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053475834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053475834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05505896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38799614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412015083","doi":"10.1111/jols.12547","title":"Indigeneity, caste, tribe and the limitations of decolonial thought in South Asian socio‐legal studies: The need for a decolonial–debrahmanical approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Caste; Tribe; Sociology; Geography; Gender studies; Anthropology; Ethnology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0530144267543017,"score_gpt":0.34379703851419025,"score_spread":0.29078261175988857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412015083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6633201,0.028387863,0.008691366,0.17460747,0.00060465594,0.00009022364,0.00006574522,0.000025616027,0.12420689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99536884,0.0018568307,0.0007628202,0.0011010374,0.00008707365,0.00004056625,0.0000059433537,0.000008827611,0.0007680815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776293,0.018966924,0.00071237463,0.0006334822,0.0011448521,0.0009130125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9354735,0.053246517,0.0034118954,0.0027524226,0.003218821,0.0018968824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041003786,0.00037555475,0.0007931265,0.004504213,0.009894316,0.016929548,0.0023384173,0.001697913,0.0018529024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029660648,0.0004375206,0.0002943958,0.0041002915,0.084003545,0.01272387,0.011816406,0.0054412284,0.000115039285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012052384,0.000023386781,0.003720679,0.00019320888,0.0000094783745,0.00011557523,0.3248292,0.00009930736,0.000084071624,0.66265374,0.000553755,0.007705611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011854465,0.000029866735,0.005978633,0.0017742324,0.000023550092,0.0001683209,0.7487118,0.0007432413,0.00021203657,0.21019112,0.03211825,0.000036958732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026025001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043455314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041003786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011863172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013835411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2168513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412155223","doi":"10.3366/legal.2025.0095","title":"Expand the Boundaries of the Legal Universe and Place Indigenous Legal Decision-Making at its Center","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legalities","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Center (category theory); Universe; Political science; Geography; Astronomy; Physics; Ecology","score_opus":0.009124271793404727,"score_gpt":0.2743275976302292,"score_spread":0.26520332583682443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412155223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18263967,0.0035603363,0.07290196,0.03998643,0.0003599514,0.00013884035,0.00007810254,0.00018595287,0.7001488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799653,0.0006885749,0.010471185,0.0008127497,0.000051504787,0.00004386041,0.000020406636,0.000057033714,0.00788933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911999,0.0033102864,0.00032755805,0.0011590527,0.0024194263,0.0015837756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898657,0.004302953,0.0007661397,0.0018152919,0.0020970355,0.0011528842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009939501,0.00036345268,0.00067106576,0.0030184316,0.014115956,0.011849228,0.002020546,0.002526322,0.008880349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01610598,0.00040395418,0.00059017946,0.0016689237,0.074800625,0.016568763,0.013397003,0.0055412706,0.0005828008],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007962806,0.000015777921,0.0009328634,0.00004674171,0.00000642126,0.00012144788,0.058353275,0.00040328607,0.000594883,0.9280306,0.00058572134,0.010900959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018488088,0.000039696573,0.004217751,0.00052088255,0.000029669103,0.0002418338,0.0910643,0.0010699304,0.00077894307,0.708192,0.19375773,0.00006868392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12193669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13682732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12193669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014503266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032461017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24245387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412223139","doi":"","title":"Overcoming Temptation?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Temptation; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05412196044332642,"score_gpt":0.3322548421441744,"score_spread":0.278132881700848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412223139","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018597402,0.013261792,0.0010949168,0.7220466,0.025745707,0.000025293863,0.00008879841,0.00005571147,0.23582153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19754502,0.017203856,0.0015961665,0.26348308,0.0327639,0.00018597722,0.00021398724,0.00037448385,0.4866335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997147,0.0013983437,0.000084493375,0.00035345097,0.0006202711,0.00039645043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949024,0.0028982423,0.0002377321,0.00026232886,0.0011176267,0.00058180344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043471777,0.000529317,0.0004913215,0.0007999483,0.007082599,0.009497714,0.0013038962,0.008194705,0.030424938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019463686,0.00022969498,0.00055901357,0.00048216994,0.009953358,0.011417596,0.004646662,0.010373766,0.0058955075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014185539,0.00002033264,0.00009371747,0.00006898934,0.000005222561,0.000069171496,0.0027804137,0.00003072782,0.000051281877,0.25992295,0.7279428,0.009000112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011410702,0.000011392522,0.00028798135,0.00034782695,0.000006063537,0.000074025775,0.0048782127,0.0000662807,0.00010390955,0.09568897,0.89851147,0.000012458703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043194923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007389207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030424938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045180847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005034448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10178149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412265647","doi":"","title":"Translation: Lost and Found. Evandro Menezes de Carvalho: The Semiotics of International Law: Trade and Translation. (book review)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Translation (biology); Linguistics; Sociology; Art; Humanities; Art history; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04538442882482854,"score_gpt":0.30382329409165254,"score_spread":0.258438865266824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412265647","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036288338,0.47040278,0.0019289011,0.096207306,0.3383464,0.00011708517,0.0050208787,0.0007996666,0.086814076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00739592,0.38941076,0.0019486267,0.03592852,0.07501182,0.00025635105,0.003927082,0.0015430518,0.48457792],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983912,0.00029104325,0.00022949517,0.00021451466,0.00076059526,0.0001130443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932875,0.0021852215,0.00059622875,0.0004189288,0.0031843083,0.00032794787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023043214,0.00233017,0.0026081398,0.0060574384,0.0016530376,0.006654149,0.0021917194,0.0027199762,0.1997713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01404724,0.0009864945,0.0010651392,0.007587697,0.0027659656,0.008205331,0.0031264664,0.0050792946,0.11883161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016909518,0.000003940141,0.000009728125,0.0007074191,0.0000058058945,0.000027173804,0.00009065496,0.000015370193,0.00004751913,0.0019015629,0.9768835,0.020290403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069054718,0.000009979676,0.00016722099,0.0009064719,0.000005146993,0.00011799007,0.00016585038,0.000016769283,0.000057733236,0.0011078467,0.9974317,0.000006417459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009415978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011198679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1997713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030031777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030219518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6683016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412265999","doi":"","title":"Documentary criminology:A cultural criminological introduction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.16410520895039368,"score_gpt":0.3678933112187888,"score_spread":0.20378810226839514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412265999","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01067692,0.25193906,0.044305723,0.41538545,0.016387735,0.00018839604,0.0005826191,0.00024459313,0.26028946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6111825,0.19908507,0.028334433,0.052689858,0.044135023,0.00049779157,0.0005146964,0.0009167426,0.06264392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921875,0.004484845,0.0006790717,0.0007149259,0.0014397021,0.0004940219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97491425,0.01818807,0.0011032148,0.0013436548,0.0029183452,0.0015324041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009427972,0.0012855809,0.0011448195,0.01123846,0.007364668,0.026816618,0.0028387913,0.009465846,0.0066277226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012379749,0.0010059247,0.00061728974,0.00813004,0.050305583,0.01449819,0.0058447053,0.012772083,0.0009913873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006702241,0.000020875677,0.00036576684,0.00028379346,0.000008341917,0.00008769706,0.009878263,0.00019992916,0.00010497415,0.9585849,0.017520497,0.012938284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009751215,0.0000337576,0.0019637125,0.002417736,0.000019806534,0.0005569104,0.015850686,0.0005780534,0.00027134063,0.32988474,0.64835095,0.00006256191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020166863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018722609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026816618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011732934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010333403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085128784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412269245","doi":"","title":"Cultural criminology and narrative criminology: shared biographies, different lives?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Criminology; Sociology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.1898271660128075,"score_gpt":0.33718087581623796,"score_spread":0.14735370980343046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412269245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5473755,0.07076244,0.010480439,0.19179839,0.00227137,0.00012047112,0.00027109275,0.00007185678,0.17684841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894438,0.004871768,0.00083832524,0.0019336003,0.00021885523,0.000046293382,0.000048287893,0.00005304572,0.0025460378],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97842556,0.0175825,0.0005343476,0.0010790371,0.0012882537,0.0010903643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722688,0.01744315,0.0031108013,0.0027012292,0.001970484,0.0025054999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015058936,0.00065522036,0.0009679159,0.00753305,0.0131939845,0.03018152,0.0023982315,0.0048041637,0.004057385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03644632,0.0008016618,0.00035587026,0.007988241,0.071776986,0.026402319,0.012207868,0.0062445425,0.00028965005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016823902,0.00002244431,0.0028119048,0.00010548998,0.00002274707,0.00025681473,0.8786324,0.00003161041,0.00008101143,0.10704568,0.0018980692,0.009074962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055679434,0.000009308193,0.0036028028,0.000595182,0.000024072984,0.00042191122,0.92316943,0.00007953322,0.000109409826,0.038721528,0.033231925,0.000029303794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02013596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030054757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03018152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008844253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0095912535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07964021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412269736","doi":"","title":"The Criminological Imagination, Jock Young, Symposium of Reviews","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Criminology; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.09237263773959017,"score_gpt":0.34254561807892936,"score_spread":0.2501729803393392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412269736","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006486792,0.8198777,0.00006304963,0.14519371,0.033998225,0.000005257482,0.00002160241,0.0000068589975,0.0007687243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004543478,0.6701769,0.00044397672,0.20056361,0.11055543,0.000066742905,0.000058814305,0.00007221696,0.013518862],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99502856,0.0019360256,0.00040181106,0.000656483,0.0016810789,0.00029619213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98845345,0.006975428,0.00065126526,0.0002440303,0.0024731855,0.0012026131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009519769,0.001460333,0.0020114724,0.003634196,0.0034747717,0.008239366,0.0015762682,0.012028021,0.0035005282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022100357,0.0011313807,0.0008180914,0.0030344161,0.0046500023,0.010895733,0.0033125563,0.011766814,0.0018958469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003946783,0.000016204474,0.00007075993,0.0010312013,0.000021246351,0.0000455713,0.00043110095,0.000042450032,0.000106844316,0.0056203753,0.978555,0.0140197575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020795727,0.000011328276,0.00019215845,0.0018121585,0.00001714134,0.00010101713,0.00035234456,0.00002509798,0.000059322305,0.00460079,0.9927913,0.000016452108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008791495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015853804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012028021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065242886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009470009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050345957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412279263","doi":"","title":"\"Law, power, knowledge\":on the continuing relevance of law to sociology","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Law; Power (physics); Sociology; Sociology of law; Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.042553763453532886,"score_gpt":0.3163445333331118,"score_spread":0.2737907698795789,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412279263","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06190019,0.09830859,0.013951883,0.67659307,0.0022610847,0.000033629487,0.00013278046,0.00005331307,0.14676541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.954548,0.021279665,0.0025355867,0.01480768,0.0016072985,0.00003965551,0.000040672447,0.00005870365,0.0050827884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99201787,0.0057446607,0.00021059498,0.0005790117,0.0009453377,0.0005025789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9547705,0.040328294,0.0012085657,0.0011424201,0.0017465004,0.0008037396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012798511,0.00039841796,0.00103786,0.003065159,0.005068905,0.01667596,0.0016957057,0.007575796,0.004279462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03118369,0.000504891,0.0003517857,0.0036932286,0.093558155,0.0242949,0.006113517,0.0060824696,0.00031876782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012934833,0.000006016518,0.00026776112,0.000080175116,0.0000034254779,0.00003790536,0.012039097,0.0000755126,0.000034046167,0.9781252,0.004243847,0.0050740633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014675393,0.000008153882,0.0010746468,0.0005085137,0.000008525293,0.00006338037,0.013208629,0.00029626468,0.00008639828,0.93235576,0.052355994,0.000019132234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016653167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015715618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01667596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069250427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007528025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06768584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412453746","doi":"10.1177/00243639251356676","title":"The Power of Words: Rebranding Euthanasia and Undermining Life's Sanctity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Linacre Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Environmental ethics; Assisted suicide; Autonomy; Right to die; Sociology; Virtue ethics; Compassion; Law; Psychology; Virtue; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01858682638071749,"score_gpt":0.3085303753311818,"score_spread":0.2899435489504643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412453746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36330482,0.01359649,0.019521637,0.14054796,0.0019312984,0.000054475942,0.00003279239,0.00010458637,0.46090594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859642,0.0014135328,0.0016924381,0.0045553027,0.00014607709,0.000019095527,0.0000077838895,0.00005582636,0.0061457073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860174,0.011048769,0.00029285104,0.0004944853,0.0015469792,0.000599541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904524,0.0057158144,0.0013952298,0.0005792365,0.0012537306,0.00060356525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007718749,0.0004162026,0.00038635795,0.0014655922,0.009404754,0.0127457995,0.00088941667,0.0026238633,0.0024855235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017512247,0.0002381942,0.00020077852,0.0010382719,0.06521358,0.010986963,0.008148973,0.005211808,0.0005025362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027156802,0.000019400022,0.001515244,0.00007802203,0.0000070265514,0.00032542372,0.38558993,0.00009549081,0.00083435164,0.5857189,0.0031385971,0.022650354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016577897,0.0000955282,0.0024837006,0.00070670387,0.000027626837,0.0007458891,0.43598542,0.00040193167,0.0014536033,0.2655219,0.29250017,0.00006086735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011270562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012209265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0127457995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069945063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0083235055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050748885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412517751","doi":"10.1177/0308518x251358115","title":"Empire of law: A book forum on Shaina Potts’ <i>Judicial Territory</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment and Planning A Economy and Space","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.00956226580245084,"score_gpt":0.2399303830389676,"score_spread":0.23036811723651676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412517751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039716023,0.1781858,0.0026128218,0.3724172,0.028000858,0.000027648577,0.00017602628,0.00011574147,0.41449234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14841712,0.11171549,0.0032172208,0.07447279,0.024077669,0.00012232966,0.00027447855,0.00043759288,0.6372653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995307,0.00019562057,0.000017923292,0.000052034586,0.00013897607,0.00006486681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991008,0.0006086305,0.000048791422,0.00003722555,0.000097133234,0.00010736658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009152644,0.00052431563,0.00045185734,0.0012155379,0.0031864296,0.004930512,0.0006265667,0.002268552,0.008493853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001782977,0.00038077956,0.00028411404,0.0019271134,0.0061010337,0.006026803,0.002036953,0.0044978927,0.001655844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051928905,0.000010577303,0.0001386931,0.000036608206,0.0000023099199,0.000057707595,0.0021273356,0.00010033323,0.00007337085,0.14234154,0.8424994,0.012606979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018732663,0.0000030134697,0.00021286144,0.00009694237,8.3336033e-7,0.000025160422,0.0007339207,0.0000382133,0.0000297553,0.013054119,0.9857998,0.0000035847802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008004122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037121538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008493853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036952046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029595739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028414726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413125850","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5383170","title":"Data&amp;nbsp;","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Psychology","score_opus":0.03910600252095851,"score_gpt":0.3555935798464257,"score_spread":0.3164875773254672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413125850","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022447566,0.0001232693,0.0004422488,0.0013209634,0.00021549601,0.000029534905,0.9336467,0.0027089992,0.061288297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009170653,0.001097023,0.0033783682,0.00068597426,0.0004631106,0.00052901247,0.8273626,0.008400758,0.14891253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757046,0.00026522684,0.00036001427,0.00039555653,0.0010957132,0.00031308128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9832423,0.004778037,0.0013716089,0.004585929,0.004895786,0.0011263378],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022236272,0.0021045273,0.002917005,0.007877653,0.0019142493,0.0075707245,0.0029945697,0.0027071869,0.7273565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027898086,0.0016707447,0.00096297596,0.020961896,0.0011984988,0.0042132908,0.0038467606,0.0032325229,0.6984247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087127555,0.000012336497,0.00029038085,0.0003609407,0.00001006479,0.000013265406,0.000039562794,0.00008520134,0.00006912902,0.0019191997,0.986133,0.010979725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012712368,0.000013876498,0.0018933084,0.00035952963,0.000017988665,0.000028475439,0.00006163718,0.0003699064,0.00055575406,0.0056284834,0.9909161,0.000027797641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04189467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031592127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2726435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043962062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006257709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38889283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413149209","doi":"10.36939/pawaatamihk/vol2no1/art87","title":"Beading Witness: Notes on (S)kin","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pawaatamihk A Journal of Métis Thinkers","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Witness; Next of kin; Psychology; History; Political science; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.017328434225287372,"score_gpt":0.3170252788185979,"score_spread":0.29969684459331053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413149209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15377608,0.012954104,0.013069946,0.12571248,0.0051558698,0.00020479655,0.00025905654,0.00019355016,0.68867415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8550022,0.0030819525,0.0018732497,0.011028746,0.00048861676,0.0001964989,0.00006209011,0.00021306027,0.12805358],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705684,0.0017861355,0.00007707052,0.0003373028,0.0003450127,0.00039769596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787056,0.0012957702,0.00013596207,0.00021229674,0.0002314858,0.0002538609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027651214,0.0006614339,0.00035830817,0.0009839002,0.022421893,0.0076764477,0.0017211812,0.0048150006,0.0132896295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011043549,0.00035900483,0.00030026003,0.0010355056,0.014517483,0.0113652665,0.008342872,0.008910491,0.001817059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000320503,0.00002123282,0.0004227444,0.00009205385,0.000005185904,0.001580565,0.68984884,0.00005169872,0.00027313334,0.2568677,0.03756175,0.013243068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005079302,0.000015032218,0.0005398475,0.0003224013,0.000005606308,0.00073631643,0.51395804,0.00013440712,0.00054937997,0.024101384,0.45961055,0.000022029146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016485415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031957462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022421893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004230121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028230303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04445827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413272160","doi":"10.1093/jaac/kpaf030","title":"Permitting Art: Visual Arts and the First Amendment on the Streets of New York","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; Visual arts; First amendment; Art; Sociology; Political science; Law; Supreme court","score_opus":0.02149366836105799,"score_gpt":0.30296767177025175,"score_spread":0.28147400340919376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413272160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020857934,0.01018388,0.0022844693,0.06614598,0.0012650411,0.000028856239,0.000069292,0.00004095127,0.8991235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7306963,0.0032952668,0.0009753883,0.007230637,0.0011445091,0.000120388846,0.000028815339,0.00008389482,0.2564247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972644,0.0013094789,0.00008817325,0.00033702154,0.00048357667,0.00051732425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965133,0.0025582167,0.00019347631,0.00033515034,0.00025835802,0.00014142143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031851046,0.00040659364,0.0003663064,0.0011674017,0.011023418,0.019911347,0.0011254991,0.009434003,0.01934476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008799182,0.0004126311,0.00032508915,0.0011904365,0.03483937,0.011642454,0.0050295736,0.008787424,0.00089049526],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005601972,0.000004001358,0.00003795521,0.000006616707,6.451038e-7,0.000021006665,0.0029117581,0.000030326864,0.000024910398,0.9878806,0.007316949,0.0017597005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024638934,0.000013066411,0.0007448514,0.00028352413,0.000008362287,0.00005288431,0.010739845,0.00029796388,0.00022432883,0.48639184,0.50118977,0.0000288987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054194365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11195042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054194365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010091292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071737194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10775781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413420683","doi":"10.58725/rivjr.v3i2.140","title":"Beliefs Matter: Concrete theoretical discourse for clarity of restorative justice practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"REVISTA INTERNACIONAL DE VITIMOLOGIA E JUSTIÇA RESTAURATIVA","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Sociology; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.015593570327354667,"score_gpt":0.38679502337562416,"score_spread":0.3712014530482695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413420683","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052023817,0.017520947,0.14884463,0.42290634,0.0027362609,0.00019630727,0.0001607226,0.00016094476,0.35544997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558202,0.0030360678,0.021493502,0.012901959,0.00070383074,0.00032272018,0.000065799075,0.00010344907,0.005552473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98654604,0.010153962,0.00047342933,0.0009923222,0.001080625,0.0007535443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97705454,0.017572528,0.0016388481,0.001349608,0.0015136133,0.0008708864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01729626,0.001015656,0.0009331902,0.0036947273,0.010296671,0.014509722,0.0032012186,0.009239292,0.005561886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023297664,0.00055781496,0.0007626543,0.0025389872,0.08548091,0.020942315,0.008942221,0.014423335,0.0007250448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042722945,0.000007146032,0.00006997267,0.00003689422,0.0000020217567,0.000036713845,0.031770006,0.000043379743,0.000054234868,0.96606797,0.0005337321,0.0013736048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013315031,0.000013892685,0.00019827543,0.00038313473,0.0000078661305,0.000062283485,0.03524737,0.00035788183,0.00016348735,0.9218468,0.041692108,0.0000136365215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045481427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035182857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01729626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009076108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006282827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09147245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413489832","doi":"10.64628/aam.gkngdm9cv","title":"I research rap lyrics and testified in a Toronto rapper’s murder trial","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lyrics; Psychology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.10823222410700464,"score_gpt":0.46234896742760095,"score_spread":0.3541167433205963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413489832","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8758436,0.0008332661,0.00044614074,0.015275863,0.00020881747,0.00007248204,0.00012337526,0.000013761687,0.10718271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97152674,0.00033274168,0.00009226782,0.0011584766,0.000051383777,0.00003543873,0.000042933247,0.00001019716,0.026749844],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99560106,0.0017344017,0.00010571205,0.0003871808,0.0009746952,0.0011969283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98687774,0.0061745443,0.0023930361,0.0006060522,0.0018154477,0.0021330852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029085432,0.00029402412,0.00035957427,0.0015134282,0.024359545,0.0064048585,0.0020252476,0.0047574616,0.010867376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025984969,0.00033318857,0.000239902,0.0022319006,0.011369494,0.0026633497,0.0046849586,0.006828982,0.00096211035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024088542,0.00020368288,0.03268121,0.00009870675,0.000047400594,0.0032130557,0.81925035,0.00039465062,0.0006954727,0.087046124,0.03723181,0.018896692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002766465,0.00012039838,0.041580822,0.0001442202,0.000032242915,0.00034497477,0.8835247,0.00031023548,0.0005915549,0.0039561004,0.06931649,0.00005057693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5428265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81382626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45717353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033446867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015064595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91973186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803010","doi":"10.29173/mlj1456","title":"Cover Artist's Statement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Statement (logic); Art; Art history; Visual arts; Engineering; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.022856236997616613,"score_gpt":0.30487180162940114,"score_spread":0.2820155646317845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803010","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035332935,0.0010165105,0.0005273267,0.010535166,0.036634393,0.00035792805,0.0043029594,0.0009438353,0.94532865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031316313,0.00064241706,0.00031424043,0.004731304,0.004180694,0.00018778599,0.0013870267,0.0005404022,0.9848846],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991518,0.000057309404,0.000046334768,0.00012073328,0.00053371675,0.00009012648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970198,0.00073192775,0.000103292696,0.0003617727,0.0014118734,0.00037135382],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090346957,0.00088456046,0.0006616628,0.0015913561,0.002535742,0.0045373226,0.0015645823,0.00278026,0.7552716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009100895,0.00035812563,0.00043070593,0.0012603878,0.0006490914,0.0020885805,0.0020592785,0.002509628,0.51754916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010104954,0.00000587177,0.0000149576845,0.000038286482,3.663415e-7,0.000027521362,0.000027877742,0.000017953314,0.000081722166,0.0016151905,0.98658156,0.011578609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033377657,0.0000032189967,0.00007032634,0.00004521524,3.8806945e-7,0.000033223045,0.000036341793,0.000027405944,0.000040740644,0.00035437173,0.9993838,0.0000016968323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00483983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073960903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7552716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011715725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012858447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34907532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803046","doi":"10.29173/mlj1465","title":"Harm to Self-Identity: Reading Goffman to Reassess the Use of Surreptitious Recordings as Evidence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Identity (music); Harm; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Art; Political science; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.094392766202109,"score_gpt":0.3582689328550255,"score_spread":0.26387616665291647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803046","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011981997,0.026763856,0.0020192575,0.9212856,0.0068131876,0.000019161771,0.00002385783,0.000027770615,0.031065317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46105227,0.030249944,0.005552681,0.45212823,0.01211598,0.000108690394,0.000046411555,0.0001850611,0.038560692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98998076,0.0065350845,0.00022378234,0.00074633036,0.0019311889,0.00058284967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98328424,0.012167108,0.00044234662,0.000979994,0.00263188,0.00049448095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01236407,0.0005252435,0.00071975414,0.0015377327,0.014121119,0.0086524645,0.0032585522,0.013750434,0.0007556969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022803396,0.00037366487,0.00039086945,0.0011369566,0.07863996,0.012935161,0.0036854902,0.0264947,0.00036548427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023377686,0.0000186061,0.0005838085,0.00011213191,0.0000129862165,0.0007188587,0.09007617,0.00012225131,0.00027230795,0.7837064,0.106609516,0.017743632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016938857,0.000038367194,0.0012911301,0.0014266989,0.000017860584,0.0007482342,0.04708257,0.0003528111,0.00082430436,0.26625702,0.6818761,0.000067925124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15172783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15894718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15172783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013963404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01675482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30168933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413803066","doi":"10.29173/mlj1458","title":"Virtually Similar? Considering the Potential for Virtual Jury Trials in Canada During and After the Pandemic","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Political science; Medicine; Virology; Law; Outbreak","score_opus":0.024283166257043746,"score_gpt":0.27432048588746144,"score_spread":0.2500373196304177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413803066","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014191458,0.012951411,0.001415119,0.9309872,0.0061476887,0.00024062584,0.00047590287,0.00006937893,0.03352128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27313232,0.025216963,0.009028236,0.6582781,0.0070588514,0.00052100426,0.00050903886,0.00029966832,0.025955738],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795259,0.004958956,0.00094590004,0.0015610865,0.006450068,0.006558075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93592066,0.015353905,0.0025228544,0.0015259457,0.017567458,0.027109237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023990562,0.00046839795,0.00086535787,0.0014001202,0.03016126,0.01752984,0.006801509,0.01647142,0.013310561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06105704,0.0006883158,0.001453631,0.0023325689,0.010108135,0.0053298566,0.005649144,0.019832892,0.000966512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067969674,0.0002821474,0.021863371,0.00081828353,0.0002771045,0.011025011,0.013585761,0.0029189682,0.00079142564,0.097424515,0.71782184,0.13251182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003651927,0.00036466232,0.02504935,0.0037618391,0.00022133332,0.002494885,0.0315225,0.0024385904,0.00051294453,0.0506467,0.8819992,0.0006228676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9489149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98984045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09508341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09508341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3345861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6898817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413953126","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaf054","title":"Understanding technology regulation through history: insights from the legal history of the printing press and copyright in early modern England","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Printing press; Legal history; History; Copyright law; History of technology; Law; Political science; Intellectual property; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07216951159195743,"score_gpt":0.2750861957258497,"score_spread":0.20291668413389224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413953126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6193698,0.0211821,0.0031404223,0.028920671,0.00018092101,0.000035080564,0.00015396034,0.00002347027,0.3269936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906873,0.0022508164,0.00017015715,0.00045904354,0.000076454635,0.000011024159,0.00001790094,0.000012470655,0.006314917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636334,0.0018965296,0.00019789816,0.00039451165,0.0007403364,0.00040737283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699163,0.02413792,0.0026554144,0.00097150647,0.0016336739,0.00068523095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053689308,0.00013655529,0.00032833812,0.0047887973,0.0054646544,0.011255492,0.0008747844,0.0023563874,0.0076296865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019458186,0.00042985764,0.00013554146,0.004399979,0.032662977,0.012770154,0.0043429863,0.0029598821,0.0003725853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004061411,0.000041913336,0.00819915,0.00017719378,0.000011040897,0.0012722159,0.36295727,0.00027270836,0.00031796543,0.60048515,0.0022247846,0.02399999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024446863,0.00008422091,0.07028805,0.0020989408,0.000028433165,0.0012449329,0.22711912,0.0006942284,0.001211621,0.16582076,0.53128314,0.000102062724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029525192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043989353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029525192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014351801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003958382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10413009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413992148","doi":"10.1353/vpr.2025.a969190","title":"Eliza Orme’s Ambitions: Politics and the Law in Victorian London by Leslie Howsam (review)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victorian periodicals review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.008587345696758501,"score_gpt":0.3054602386741957,"score_spread":0.2968728929774372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413992148","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008387533,0.81890434,0.000051646402,0.16123514,0.015742617,0.000010581941,0.000044885688,0.000007821027,0.0039191274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004869279,0.73403776,0.00027261153,0.20914182,0.016629644,0.00008506187,0.000091760565,0.000056269615,0.034815766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939116,0.0025273743,0.00049367273,0.00038287105,0.0021183193,0.0005660872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98846406,0.0056952736,0.00092169014,0.00028516518,0.003076599,0.0015572172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008089119,0.00089491747,0.0013374329,0.0035561486,0.0028607354,0.009485332,0.0014820485,0.0071963323,0.008656216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023387222,0.0007301686,0.0007243938,0.0048029236,0.006089369,0.0060230163,0.0044681,0.009485247,0.0030394313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016094797,0.0000048488355,0.00008091201,0.0016711135,0.000024563693,0.000038630078,0.0004919561,0.000026551987,0.000030444933,0.0070354757,0.9613547,0.029224688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009641654,0.0000052259193,0.00035764417,0.003914649,0.00002059444,0.000054490916,0.0003767831,0.000007742996,0.000017245873,0.0015854957,0.99363625,0.000014231164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10435131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23701406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10435131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0130657675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035252336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20748782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414095777","doi":"10.1007/s11196-025-10362-0","title":"A Doctrine of Insignificant Presence: Legal Survivals and the Erasure of Indigenous Rights","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universitetet i Tromsø","keywords":"Semiotics; Legal pluralism; Indigenous; Legal doctrine; Legal realism; Doctrine; Colonialism; Legal history; Legal fiction","score_opus":0.015647684827164048,"score_gpt":0.32695287685508645,"score_spread":0.3113051920279224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414095777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4275714,0.0021361525,0.020553041,0.01386578,0.00029546526,0.000037156304,0.000039074734,0.000051804876,0.5354501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99638957,0.00012047634,0.00060211006,0.00008477539,0.000017381275,0.0000049092714,0.0000037139419,0.0000062737504,0.0027708793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99392784,0.0033310652,0.00019007697,0.00055516214,0.0012581922,0.0007377257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99158,0.003750159,0.0009817493,0.0013647499,0.0015052448,0.00081820163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005950296,0.00018986453,0.000441667,0.001321296,0.007411119,0.006856865,0.0013835746,0.0012968514,0.0023733906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011147819,0.00024520766,0.00023199081,0.00080200564,0.102687955,0.005476656,0.007035757,0.004055035,0.0001557652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008287484,0.0000067407686,0.00042978712,0.000016423795,0.0000020460561,0.00012408811,0.035447434,0.00008911611,0.00021307581,0.9601984,0.00021685976,0.0032477963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032865755,0.000099865385,0.004833956,0.00048248773,0.000034153567,0.00054100313,0.07833709,0.0014383326,0.0013147116,0.8021152,0.11069956,0.00007079558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049874023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05000501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049874023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00917201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012302449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09916741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414105653","doi":"10.1017/9781009604987.047","title":"On the Intelligible Beauty","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Beauty; Feature (linguistics); Key (lock); Natural (archaeology); Theme (computing)","score_opus":0.02634987508429721,"score_gpt":0.23113365704076297,"score_spread":0.20478378195646577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414105653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008417359,0.029524704,0.001491174,0.020456066,0.0026419014,0.000011183639,0.000116090385,0.00005333752,0.94486386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0608976,0.024968045,0.0011858505,0.0072674407,0.0033607797,0.00004214403,0.00024292793,0.00017401672,0.9018612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995443,0.0001441419,0.000012884282,0.000057710975,0.00019794675,0.000043029686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952745,0.00021087853,0.000019049005,0.00007174855,0.00013047486,0.00004035614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006094946,0.00051913806,0.0003100327,0.0010254873,0.0016061937,0.0036737567,0.0005239852,0.0010305783,0.042397656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020363843,0.00016474577,0.00026254254,0.00076379505,0.0046228254,0.003787528,0.0012698355,0.0024227211,0.009657753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008351096,0.000007509528,0.00003417363,0.00006830161,0.0000018001188,0.00005386546,0.001101607,0.0001267992,0.00007086102,0.5751349,0.38852492,0.034866903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015477494,0.000003906852,0.00008647143,0.0001391572,0.0000010951287,0.00004699147,0.00032882183,0.00005872898,0.000041056286,0.0674809,0.9318086,0.0000028146978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004093647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00599096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042397656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022980582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013159805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14183426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414355195","doi":"10.17951/adr.2024.2.53-64","title":"How to Talk about Restorative Justice?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ADR Arbitraż i mediacja","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proclamation; Restorative justice; Economic Justice; State (computer science); Conviction; Administration of justice","score_opus":0.016873146279559985,"score_gpt":0.31771021388261866,"score_spread":0.30083706760305867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414355195","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00095572014,0.03429461,0.0057983333,0.90593493,0.011260856,0.000025144618,0.00002086579,0.00005845875,0.04165109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30868122,0.063074,0.015347038,0.5382473,0.030285152,0.0006932021,0.000099429984,0.00061555376,0.042957176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96966034,0.020409228,0.00077322096,0.0022907793,0.0040329173,0.0028335245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835988,0.009950687,0.001077782,0.0013562293,0.002492079,0.0015243051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024332555,0.0017482585,0.0019732022,0.004741454,0.020700615,0.025525507,0.0049481853,0.018371211,0.010266441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033229563,0.0006195112,0.0015593346,0.0031391094,0.12718102,0.049894087,0.012927097,0.041544694,0.0038142113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001636172,0.000033985754,0.00011105456,0.00024868292,0.00001553397,0.00008504979,0.017033467,0.00011128844,0.000059105296,0.9182179,0.052658707,0.011408947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008173784,0.000015418525,0.00008188182,0.00085721695,0.0000071491213,0.000105169034,0.018262051,0.00006065642,0.000078244186,0.7165774,0.26392484,0.000021776768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068521225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005793959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025525507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012893214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012859673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1286844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414635865","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-98561-4_7","title":"You Can’t Just Be the Anti-Trump When You’re a Liability Too: Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, and (Re)Branding in the 2024 Campaign","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave studies in political marketing and management","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Thomas University","funders":"","keywords":"Nomination; Politics; Presidential system; Referendum; Liability; Consolidation (business)","score_opus":0.050938604564191005,"score_gpt":0.33121585225837036,"score_spread":0.28027724769417933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414635865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023744074,0.06905243,0.0009428527,0.32606226,0.0105159655,0.00002299265,0.00007333843,0.00006553795,0.5908903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03944806,0.017317569,0.0008119459,0.06940091,0.0026875136,0.000054676617,0.00004852985,0.00020507223,0.87002575],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991986,0.00028167685,0.000017084849,0.00007824973,0.00030967232,0.00011468667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912614,0.00050610065,0.00003713391,0.00003775705,0.00016259444,0.00013029591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00130785,0.0005092237,0.0003023582,0.00070031954,0.0068542315,0.010207055,0.00072635186,0.007165152,0.02355881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034512267,0.0005593461,0.0001966651,0.0010526151,0.0065184096,0.009789939,0.0020868985,0.008519125,0.008051988],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056252575,0.000015814387,0.00006170491,0.000031139378,0.0000014167631,0.000019162197,0.0030966445,0.000017985176,0.000041130566,0.21899106,0.76196355,0.015754832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034441512,0.0000035292449,0.00014593068,0.00013633067,0.0000014545645,0.000024234538,0.002128938,0.000030506433,0.00005971708,0.028880153,0.9685787,0.000007059644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024611114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.088839665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024611114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036869803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004997756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07881212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414775782","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2025.10044","title":"Defending the Juridical","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Morality; Private law; Distributive property; Normative; Philosophy of law; Order (exchange); State (computer science); Scope (computer science)","score_opus":0.017567693185092288,"score_gpt":0.3129356757690425,"score_spread":0.29536798258395025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414775782","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019776568,0.004181832,0.10026465,0.15902634,0.002575136,0.00010251788,0.00013225466,0.00013444606,0.7138063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91911316,0.0013188074,0.016358878,0.015796361,0.0016674355,0.00021598158,0.000052970674,0.00010329381,0.04537319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837372,0.008379797,0.00058149104,0.0021640707,0.004099506,0.0010378386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98990977,0.005564091,0.0005909681,0.0015761314,0.0017177886,0.00064118125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021220595,0.0005412158,0.0008891594,0.0018496272,0.0061110146,0.011486861,0.002950891,0.009654675,0.005701388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025377909,0.0006476414,0.00067478063,0.00090509804,0.051573526,0.012371514,0.01034607,0.0146517735,0.0011296673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018428603,0.0000018380914,0.000016860095,0.000003555219,7.354417e-7,0.000004574793,0.0003660294,0.000034861212,0.000011746492,0.99811316,0.00092411437,0.00052075606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013075735,0.000007766321,0.000054597647,0.00008739127,0.0000043073,0.000015550937,0.00048551822,0.00041193765,0.00012435595,0.9569467,0.041838456,0.00001038343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006117807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061082523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021220595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075702164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009771434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112226546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414909186","doi":"10.1017/9781009552356.011","title":"The Secret Code of Body Language","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Gesture; Nonverbal communication; Body language; Tone (literature); Zoom; Facial expression","score_opus":0.013583545706501582,"score_gpt":0.23305924994659724,"score_spread":0.21947570424009566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414909186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030884123,0.004892787,0.016076388,0.006386661,0.0014825843,0.000040962288,0.00022081687,0.00017123559,0.96764004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33164793,0.007300825,0.00946329,0.0041429494,0.0018899785,0.00027812444,0.00036761333,0.00048200495,0.6444274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998887,0.0003789946,0.00006308305,0.00015767371,0.00039679828,0.000116518146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998852,0.00048731593,0.00008224296,0.00027323488,0.00024439793,0.000060740433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096412905,0.00048342836,0.00026252825,0.001195327,0.0021084053,0.005553131,0.0005884402,0.0016308213,0.013964729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003481978,0.00024088298,0.00018742374,0.0007896846,0.014911216,0.0044174367,0.0021979492,0.0030249401,0.0073170094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007558194,0.0000027459098,0.00005757744,0.000026464728,0.000001368156,0.000029563633,0.001531921,0.00007969972,0.00016977993,0.96650934,0.013234321,0.018349668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005365717,0.00001482582,0.0004123021,0.00024928723,0.0000039382676,0.000284545,0.0008382669,0.00035650952,0.00068244437,0.3062086,0.69092834,0.000015543801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029719383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001958569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013964729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021014563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020237053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04671669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957213","doi":"10.21991/cf29498","title":"Deconstructing City of Toronto: Unwritten Constitutional Principles and Responsive Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Judicial review; Supreme court; Democracy; Constitutional law; Judicial activism; Key (lock); Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.024817443499189795,"score_gpt":0.31920598021649615,"score_spread":0.29438853671730636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957213","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058106527,0.015945459,0.053803504,0.181595,0.001036467,0.0003493364,0.00023196792,0.00022899729,0.6887028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9396585,0.0025267794,0.009480394,0.010560526,0.00026672077,0.00013746705,0.000044783403,0.000060851435,0.037263904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746961,0.008928265,0.0008002528,0.0026683372,0.008592704,0.004314414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877693,0.0067200144,0.0007690469,0.0010986166,0.0025836716,0.0010594017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014776603,0.0004296381,0.00044947414,0.0024273333,0.017304538,0.016884968,0.0027390486,0.0062714326,0.0023811802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024165789,0.0006241421,0.0004256086,0.0021809682,0.03684151,0.0048493175,0.005285632,0.006827543,0.00027359123],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028506267,0.0000012799286,0.00016066905,0.000014607538,0.0000030882384,0.00005501294,0.0033525485,0.00022928399,0.000068575864,0.99044,0.0026763931,0.002995735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004461972,0.00002674653,0.003605957,0.0003243197,0.000056859037,0.0001725191,0.009669428,0.002703627,0.0010309906,0.5906375,0.39158705,0.00014036048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83221316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91380924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16778684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09814317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1407545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71208185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414957226","doi":"10.21991/cf29497","title":"The Role of Democratic Majority Understandings of Rights in Rosalind Dixon’s Responsive Judicial Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Democracy; Judicial activism; Subject (documents); Judicial independence","score_opus":0.010602688835130982,"score_gpt":0.2920016914288353,"score_spread":0.2813990025937043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414957226","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023807526,0.00557917,0.08676546,0.33226654,0.0024315207,0.00027125783,0.000060898325,0.00016023027,0.5486574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8593074,0.0013585833,0.01928852,0.06985651,0.0017535842,0.00038581673,0.000023214652,0.00008453123,0.047941808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92977226,0.03989129,0.0020647862,0.008112486,0.014559131,0.0055999965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96250796,0.027864132,0.0015718023,0.0027465895,0.00406938,0.001240198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048925783,0.0005934188,0.0008395767,0.0020917263,0.016001405,0.020827223,0.0032340274,0.013535937,0.0028542099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06283846,0.0008177797,0.0010909131,0.0012587791,0.043819778,0.013481645,0.008984495,0.017857475,0.000591012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039860643,0.0000048772094,0.00006933669,0.0000075910752,0.000004458241,0.00003805875,0.0015580489,0.00013030195,0.000042276435,0.99336433,0.0026353654,0.0021414207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034397755,0.00001691673,0.00024640156,0.000080633195,0.000016278376,0.00006851479,0.0009633455,0.0007615804,0.00039741735,0.9137672,0.08360188,0.00004550153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021067569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024991283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048925783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014335062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016348692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2587474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415108605","doi":"10.1109/iccv51701.2025.01632","title":"Fair Generation without Unfair Distortions: Debiasing Text-To-Image Generation with Entanglement-Free Attention","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kootenay Association for Science & Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Debiasing; Perception; Inference; Distribution (mathematics); Unintended consequences; Causal inference; Probability distribution; Generative model","score_opus":0.022384653108798135,"score_gpt":0.3042610666274,"score_spread":0.2818764135186019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415108605","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06988844,0.00078952324,0.92019033,0.0006972371,0.00016675447,0.00012341356,0.00013063056,0.0022516784,0.0057620043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86168265,0.00027252568,0.13011901,0.00069618685,0.00012885152,0.00012974847,0.00024356578,0.0005439437,0.0061835847],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923587,0.00026507085,0.00002608308,0.00021578405,0.00016789517,0.00008942104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655485,0.0022054072,0.0001812231,0.00063748576,0.00026227813,0.00015875857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019953477,0.0008460339,0.0007907889,0.00060631864,0.0006190499,0.0011109641,0.0019334732,0.0012218748,0.0042402036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009273164,0.00043230847,0.00073774875,0.00040481417,0.0013489422,0.0022364107,0.0028386172,0.0015613856,0.0007644082],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006040484,0.000271497,0.003778494,0.00025698962,0.00015854227,0.0006043794,0.0011898536,0.49479967,0.03273977,0.062267806,0.007538615,0.39579034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032388158,0.000043514545,0.00030592593,0.000012325065,0.00002108752,0.00008124503,0.00003427775,0.960909,0.00512151,0.03207366,0.0013480365,0.000017005394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035252103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037907783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042402036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010531131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008050308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014184952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415398751","doi":"10.1109/isi65680.2025.11201116","title":"Chain-of-Ethics: Defending Against Narrative Camouflage Attacks in LLM Moral Judgment","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Adversarial system; Camouflage; Accountability; Trustworthiness; Vulnerability (computing); Moral reasoning; Normative ethics","score_opus":0.04408818784319817,"score_gpt":0.35134546020484686,"score_spread":0.3072572723616487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415398751","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108357176,0.00077604956,0.86090446,0.00756396,0.00023423685,0.00038353543,0.0004710423,0.0029726007,0.018336944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74868137,0.00021555697,0.24639831,0.001199487,0.00008491634,0.0002098231,0.0006518395,0.0004538435,0.002104867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.96370006,0.027207004,0.0013015422,0.0027688663,0.0043575144,0.0006651108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89954394,0.06714542,0.006796138,0.020920996,0.0043498846,0.0012436312],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02223374,0.0011928247,0.0007093175,0.0018108626,0.002231648,0.006223088,0.0024607072,0.00332042,0.0038771583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14175315,0.0008391292,0.0015212138,0.0009024063,0.008632952,0.011476903,0.010798632,0.006326871,0.0012054208],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071691244,0.00031987496,0.03138774,0.0010770796,0.00031480243,0.0010703787,0.025691142,0.08896995,0.010452838,0.54123735,0.019496936,0.27926496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061023275,0.00010257027,0.0014013193,0.0002575952,0.00006389229,0.00041529242,0.0019703628,0.35566497,0.008673719,0.6029659,0.028328216,0.00009517408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035630998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004653345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02223374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022894463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033620973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.117584646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415684622","doi":"10.1007/978-3-032-04653-6_2","title":"Transdisciplinarity in Law: An Epistemological Necessity of the 21st Century","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Francophone University Association","funders":"","keywords":"Transdisciplinarity; Reflexivity; Normative; Variety (cybernetics); Relevance (law); Diversity (politics); Cognition","score_opus":0.027789985240851533,"score_gpt":0.29905974844171923,"score_spread":0.2712697632008677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415684622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009609902,0.029614085,0.051545665,0.08915158,0.0016193104,0.0000613316,0.000054606397,0.00009128226,0.8182522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8434445,0.019919677,0.028919335,0.020819739,0.0045195245,0.00038452586,0.000120426936,0.00027498417,0.08159736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99193656,0.004724981,0.00027177436,0.00068490556,0.0019998653,0.00038208012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890478,0.0069660638,0.00048463524,0.0012379808,0.0015616349,0.0007019504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009030673,0.00055199495,0.0010508122,0.0022025357,0.0061294963,0.014269915,0.0017731197,0.006054821,0.0048753205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010019358,0.00043380988,0.00048710319,0.0027293062,0.06312291,0.020354016,0.0064550373,0.012071805,0.00092086446],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.993774e-7,0.0000043367863,0.000011636121,0.000008595793,6.849436e-7,0.000004828705,0.0008987205,0.000017325274,0.0000087837725,0.9967974,0.0008351212,0.001411833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023979935,0.0000029376743,0.00002765967,0.00004747799,7.524452e-7,0.000018888393,0.0007249537,0.000096341326,0.00002076398,0.9699377,0.029117696,0.000002538849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039503532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051907394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014269915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006048626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011065145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047759295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415779826","doi":"10.1017/9781009466134.010","title":"What About the Law and Hoarding?","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hoarding (animal behavior); Conflict of laws; Common law; Affect (linguistics); Abandonment (legal)","score_opus":0.019543123104326682,"score_gpt":0.2265769509690954,"score_spread":0.2070338278647687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415779826","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0119238105,0.07059563,0.0023533695,0.15062104,0.0033763614,0.000026687572,0.000066916444,0.000071375456,0.7609649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4942963,0.093161404,0.0027046844,0.037935205,0.0036456347,0.0000750653,0.00014315147,0.00020336849,0.36783522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984633,0.0005535056,0.000042859407,0.00015731744,0.00038494237,0.00039811054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893385,0.00048661858,0.00014405894,0.000083101855,0.00017543907,0.00017694428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012881394,0.00029052625,0.00034074124,0.0010011548,0.00520006,0.008831604,0.0008980091,0.0034686874,0.014590941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003931075,0.00022955374,0.00033410528,0.0015403983,0.019519813,0.011284467,0.0018092301,0.0046262215,0.002796316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007702203,0.000022663977,0.0006247948,0.00009694696,0.0000033441866,0.00013244433,0.013766063,0.000064400265,0.000053516782,0.85594094,0.089206286,0.040081017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042874444,0.000018065659,0.0023294631,0.0009866446,0.0000059592576,0.00039069657,0.0187846,0.00012454647,0.00009855632,0.15647872,0.8207594,0.000019004558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043954175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035288755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043954175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004680247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043371096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08739662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416290457","doi":"10.29173/alr2631","title":"Some Legal Legends","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.017112092945160168,"score_gpt":0.3170938425486305,"score_spread":0.29998174960347035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416290457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011821103,0.049323615,0.0011284784,0.34603965,0.07762186,0.00010006507,0.0012544869,0.00046103253,0.52288866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026700916,0.025767108,0.0015511571,0.191653,0.020371594,0.00012753296,0.0009749239,0.00035161118,0.7325021],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99384236,0.0010221653,0.00023543915,0.0005555675,0.0032663231,0.0010781066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98872656,0.0026438124,0.00044244545,0.00085077825,0.0064003207,0.0009361149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051631513,0.0006987159,0.000713663,0.007476801,0.009548659,0.013293839,0.0029995693,0.009838794,0.057978425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019677231,0.000890755,0.0008738396,0.0064227995,0.0066229524,0.0037953986,0.0020300932,0.009373275,0.013147213],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051933025,0.000004333617,0.000032334403,0.000038893315,0.0000019139613,0.000020434734,0.00008844832,0.000023838598,0.000024134164,0.030892733,0.95935446,0.009513254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044326666,0.0000025320555,0.00035575012,0.00013209673,0.0000048283046,0.000017639994,0.00019118263,0.000026464031,0.000035451572,0.004431448,0.99478877,0.0000094166135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40738872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6315341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40738872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01700768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025770979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8100349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417168031","doi":"10.1093/9780190927295.001.0001","title":"Making Amends for Historic Wrongs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Looting; Redress; Restitution; The Holocaust; Economic Justice; Face (sociological concept); Commission; Royal Commission; Transitional justice","score_opus":0.05087552173088396,"score_gpt":0.3470687989778422,"score_spread":0.29619327724695826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417168031","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052846856,0.0031136542,0.022775745,0.09271305,0.008285534,0.00028048365,0.00008691979,0.00066990074,0.8192278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6837104,0.0020522901,0.009129179,0.023419559,0.002447066,0.00013870766,0.00010790475,0.00030963606,0.2786853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98601866,0.0045107775,0.00097313366,0.0011757134,0.0050490736,0.002272639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836998,0.0069714314,0.0013871475,0.0034882582,0.0032555035,0.0011978293],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011135163,0.0003861834,0.0005645246,0.0013587446,0.012045066,0.009713603,0.0024698277,0.011121835,0.013203647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029412612,0.00062439946,0.0006874832,0.0007961178,0.02350845,0.010425272,0.008506624,0.012998277,0.0027539479],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016152117,0.00008776785,0.0012668315,0.000060898532,0.000010224874,0.0010597212,0.020993212,0.00045840928,0.00047282252,0.859843,0.0877194,0.028011559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001675605,0.00007815675,0.0012338423,0.0005116398,0.000029779101,0.0007300186,0.019593803,0.00041724546,0.0013374188,0.098685555,0.8772857,0.000080096535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055804546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013178511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013203647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005194767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075252005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05888909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W45258291","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511610394","title":"Evolution and the Common Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Context (archaeology); Common law; Law; Politics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.013762564474217925,"score_gpt":0.215649407658454,"score_spread":0.20188684318423608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W45258291","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072071,0.023649253,0.008521635,0.025714058,0.000743037,0.000024020801,0.000052630276,0.00005614514,0.93403226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5767436,0.016438777,0.0062163444,0.006641431,0.00096878427,0.00009340389,0.00013651238,0.0001057649,0.39265534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928844,0.0002840069,0.000019196452,0.00012811112,0.00020517834,0.00007508745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952865,0.00024134613,0.000039041362,0.00007344815,0.00007550602,0.000041985248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009124876,0.0002497218,0.00023170518,0.0008016973,0.002801577,0.004096076,0.00064747257,0.0015798949,0.005696463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002000778,0.00014329252,0.00019350817,0.0006841218,0.015888548,0.0044999304,0.0016878479,0.002004736,0.00075509393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010440268,0.0000014689928,0.000035857018,0.0000053786275,4.740418e-7,0.000011515075,0.0005294175,0.00007234267,0.000012803273,0.991629,0.0035882373,0.0041126003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002770852,0.0000060903917,0.00030834187,0.00008932405,0.000001796288,0.000067379246,0.0005276979,0.00027841175,0.000060385923,0.6284086,0.37024504,0.000004206912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062703094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005916249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062703094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055270204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002612398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04010153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W561985995","doi":"","title":"GIRARD, Philip – Lawyers and Legal Culture in British North America: Beamish Murdoch of Halifax","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Histoire sociale","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Humanities; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.009810501815579159,"score_gpt":0.23771495424841116,"score_spread":0.227904452432832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W561985995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39920503,0.13182741,0.0005713863,0.36465436,0.0018332395,0.00009788982,0.0007091666,0.00006056193,0.10104094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8699366,0.029323183,0.00038886248,0.012486978,0.0002912812,0.00005466705,0.00013575773,0.00005334083,0.08732926],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994074,0.00024855408,0.00002043742,0.00005055561,0.00008482927,0.00018817808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974922,0.0010671361,0.00019528455,0.000055054126,0.00069456623,0.0004957708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008917511,0.0003249779,0.0002983971,0.0014220767,0.016970413,0.004056975,0.0012873705,0.0025516865,0.010137807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022486118,0.000362649,0.00013461692,0.002678074,0.006355694,0.0030466919,0.0018352834,0.0031702362,0.0007492251],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001907524,0.00008229344,0.026856033,0.00046551123,0.00004961048,0.0024838715,0.6388048,0.00016084284,0.0010050426,0.03962726,0.23790364,0.05237039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013908551,0.000018826706,0.09328793,0.00049503404,0.000024165602,0.00038156292,0.49747875,0.000047792397,0.00034715256,0.002181941,0.40567422,0.00004867263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8579925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94837505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14200753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015443929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013185524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28568763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W568475452","doi":"","title":"Law as a gendering practice","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Lesbian; Sociology; Family law; Political science; Gender studies; Public law; Subaltern; Feminist legal theory; Criminology; Feminism","score_opus":0.026921654146049676,"score_gpt":0.32298026741777586,"score_spread":0.29605861327172617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W568475452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009060154,0.054434042,0.008734504,0.073066846,0.0011613364,0.000074717755,0.00013535109,0.00010580747,0.85322726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5941322,0.046256706,0.0059699924,0.017434126,0.00132673,0.00026697203,0.0001886742,0.00016421214,0.33426037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745756,0.0008612855,0.000043680033,0.00028276374,0.00083845994,0.0005163026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985655,0.0005820502,0.00011824401,0.00013221096,0.00038493442,0.00021712942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023065195,0.0007949088,0.00047202306,0.0025318651,0.010344942,0.010480934,0.0017354691,0.0042119683,0.008903886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021551442,0.00030291273,0.000423602,0.0033260728,0.071875595,0.007739423,0.0028772056,0.004131154,0.0010003052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011657348,0.000005113102,0.00010254438,0.000032682765,0.0000012014623,0.000041339477,0.01307504,0.000116658586,0.000049077895,0.96922237,0.01224094,0.0051118573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048549996,0.000009191248,0.0006411803,0.0005676365,0.0000039020915,0.00008700045,0.01839886,0.00020095617,0.00008905266,0.27890983,0.7010754,0.000012164423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6164301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60262376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6164301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05685661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04265378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7716576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W58362048","doi":"","title":"Pierre-Claude Lafond, \"Techniques de repérage des sources documentaires du droit\".","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art; Political science","score_opus":0.011602145756283837,"score_gpt":0.2584583583682571,"score_spread":0.24685621261197324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W58362048","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008738409,0.34910333,0.15122008,0.1386832,0.0051455353,0.00021835222,0.0016453429,0.001959836,0.34328592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36251706,0.25191912,0.11235521,0.01607364,0.0061192224,0.00087817764,0.0019811282,0.0017260446,0.24643043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964301,0.0017244223,0.00020213636,0.00040096123,0.0010038769,0.00023858927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889453,0.008846836,0.0002695651,0.0002917981,0.0015285059,0.00011801284],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005778619,0.0015525477,0.0006890758,0.0059711644,0.0068276306,0.008399412,0.0024153085,0.0064583593,0.02020174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019198,0.0008515303,0.0009986141,0.0054640872,0.0054158336,0.014368513,0.0022499743,0.004957736,0.005829268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013028785,0.00003546581,0.00093356555,0.0007144814,0.000048328675,0.0007196349,0.012269067,0.00043409076,0.00044434745,0.6702393,0.23124097,0.08279038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004244015,0.000024711206,0.0023804295,0.0010237758,0.00005162551,0.00053638715,0.0053769113,0.0009083837,0.0016139913,0.20097351,0.7869925,0.00007533276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07577026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071817085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005656375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025064356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15065843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W586150650","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1366","title":"Book Notes: Hiding From Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law, by Martha C. Nussbaum","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disgust; Shame; Humanity; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Law; Philosophy; Political science; Social psychology; Anger","score_opus":0.013835701313724589,"score_gpt":0.253589921518729,"score_spread":0.23975422020500442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W586150650","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011850646,0.32997313,0.0018007886,0.53525376,0.012771093,0.00001754051,0.00020227057,0.0000861241,0.11871019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03671209,0.33093742,0.0033680985,0.14498027,0.019897068,0.00012285878,0.00016497647,0.00021649277,0.4636008],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995128,0.0001579527,0.00002391815,0.000073285984,0.0002008263,0.00003123575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966042,0.0024963145,0.00010674435,0.00008336982,0.00053007866,0.0001792849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012127074,0.00086770195,0.00062799314,0.0016204687,0.004462917,0.0053847106,0.0011386328,0.0052719032,0.02112957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048290202,0.00058974366,0.0002778338,0.0016990111,0.007848106,0.01024046,0.0011613003,0.0059380624,0.0057659843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007412147,0.0000115914245,0.00012209946,0.00006820232,0.0000023762373,0.000036104924,0.0009940362,0.00004198146,0.000052318126,0.041274432,0.94211626,0.015273172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010068134,0.000014770195,0.0010500409,0.0007237282,0.000005707498,0.00030109205,0.003230362,0.000120341705,0.00014389258,0.06442513,0.92995006,0.000024911837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02627751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08668715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02627751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026002924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032331052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070685506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W591356535","doi":"10.1075/dapsac.5","title":"Discourse and Silencing","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Discourse approaches to politics, society and culture","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Politics; Negotiation; Political science; Gene silencing; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07235971429141087,"score_gpt":0.30317929490568396,"score_spread":0.2308195806142731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W591356535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037365498,0.032470908,0.0060604657,0.017494231,0.0016883882,0.00005814601,0.00006389966,0.00008086159,0.93834656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2964552,0.04577215,0.0060614115,0.010086088,0.0030586312,0.00044737756,0.00028571117,0.00034136564,0.6374921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961132,0.002102555,0.00013046454,0.00045969093,0.0008753552,0.00031866072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997629,0.0015425474,0.00017003983,0.00027333765,0.00027840887,0.000106647654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023781091,0.0009442074,0.00060762634,0.002052079,0.0065179216,0.0140027385,0.0012970837,0.003603346,0.00861998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053078756,0.00032111126,0.00048593915,0.002399705,0.030181086,0.011327245,0.0051300093,0.004539561,0.0027570627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044189273,0.0000038605112,0.000034128316,0.00006163643,0.0000020299121,0.000047017464,0.01608051,0.00006657969,0.000102916674,0.9594163,0.014540594,0.009640038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006329648,0.000009899398,0.00010741449,0.00043233167,0.0000048395855,0.00012865764,0.0063250167,0.000118038915,0.00028700737,0.21852173,0.77405035,0.000008418489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049390653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034089407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0140027385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076827384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048426995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055742443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W608335702","doi":"10.2307/4126462","title":"Reading the Naked Truth: Literacy, Legislation, and Lies","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Legislation; Literacy; Psychology; Pedagogy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.028241730825650624,"score_gpt":0.2941563126028425,"score_spread":0.26591458177719185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W608335702","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060498122,0.022425313,0.0029505263,0.43842405,0.0008190182,0.000027002674,0.00010266517,0.000040340718,0.4747129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9539794,0.0054204245,0.00077657204,0.018416194,0.0005566733,0.000029707802,0.000034297263,0.000046642006,0.020740174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873875,0.007302024,0.00044886375,0.00080417533,0.0024047575,0.0016527586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9533473,0.037534647,0.002615242,0.0012241008,0.0033912389,0.0018874338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010329483,0.00027319344,0.0006172895,0.0023218135,0.012143468,0.01714519,0.0014332939,0.010617056,0.008995795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049380448,0.00037680022,0.00029059662,0.0025450422,0.06211902,0.013971337,0.0053964886,0.012513658,0.0007864412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021454152,0.00004028743,0.0012844178,0.00009328622,0.000006206677,0.0002346533,0.10074291,0.000074960444,0.00008702209,0.8560778,0.020706356,0.020630635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025719532,0.00003420904,0.0044066315,0.0017600777,0.000023738452,0.0003367731,0.10883182,0.00027569814,0.00034512265,0.6166255,0.2672752,0.000059459744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11725339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12817448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8827466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010188996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021641986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23314178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W608446170","doi":"10.33137/cal.v2i2.26083","title":"Effect and Technique in Legal Aesthetics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Analysis of Law","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Aesthetics; Legal realism; Balance (ability); Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Proportionality (law); Empirical legal studies; Legal formalism; Legal pluralism; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Legal profession; Political science; Art; Psychology; Philosophy; Black letter law; History; Comparative law; Private law","score_opus":0.019706348481952365,"score_gpt":0.3583304323864481,"score_spread":0.3386240839044957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W608446170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034562588,0.0046065077,0.06653297,0.034743115,0.0021596795,0.00008421293,0.00004400795,0.00015932143,0.8571076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9559871,0.0019174992,0.0126956,0.0026384105,0.0008896364,0.00013050428,0.000018723802,0.0002821719,0.025440374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837875,0.010893034,0.00040836507,0.0011248095,0.0030631763,0.00072317955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820087,0.0129194595,0.00100773,0.0022661688,0.0014559926,0.0003419526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014109554,0.0007379572,0.00049755315,0.0037310624,0.0064192857,0.009300206,0.0016351131,0.0029448506,0.010508257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030317284,0.00037109398,0.0010645969,0.002212644,0.07657621,0.016622046,0.0070632906,0.007590405,0.00079799845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007460784,0.0000045769425,0.00008619009,0.000029129034,0.0000027179185,0.00003519179,0.007997696,0.00005995752,0.00010154531,0.98830545,0.00090128055,0.0024687906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026703927,0.00003294066,0.00045831376,0.00018723674,0.0000135060745,0.00026447934,0.010772738,0.0004882986,0.00048599893,0.8873926,0.09985427,0.000022991615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001212824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013383235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014109554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004245958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019403212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07461935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W611700264","doi":"","title":"On Kiddie Porn: Sexual Representation, Free Speech and the Robin Sharpe Case by Stan Persky, John Dixon (review)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Law; Political science","score_opus":0.010597344389337592,"score_gpt":0.2451869993572848,"score_spread":0.2345896549679472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W611700264","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022646761,0.9778161,0.000029712122,0.018704735,0.0012769932,0.0000024079366,0.000009309989,0.000001518852,0.0019327606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033658757,0.9828257,0.000059403555,0.009691573,0.0021143605,0.000011475233,0.000017876355,0.000004691804,0.0019089718],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979929,0.0010651246,0.000116590396,0.00018438022,0.00047430198,0.00016676151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949136,0.0036889026,0.00049431983,0.000113054564,0.00051896845,0.00027105748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042572687,0.0008589579,0.0018027168,0.0026109247,0.001870028,0.0033521054,0.0015144648,0.0060388953,0.0051416964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01119273,0.00054310175,0.0004293511,0.0044353334,0.009393966,0.005773405,0.002989017,0.004932934,0.0013997216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008118993,0.000059329956,0.0006598052,0.0055519193,0.000071123606,0.00048505026,0.0035647084,0.00013079513,0.000084778774,0.040101282,0.60223377,0.34697628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030383402,0.00005372011,0.0028901303,0.016028276,0.00007357389,0.0018113126,0.005137463,0.00003283713,0.00006803369,0.01088058,0.9629563,0.000037359463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029929876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06024162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029929876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025138035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006700114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059511304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W614239619","doi":"10.5040/9781472559265","title":"A Virtue Less Cloistered : Courts, Speech and Constitutions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Virtue; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Linguistics; Sociology","score_opus":0.045992244210116245,"score_gpt":0.26490301324475346,"score_spread":0.21891076903463721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W614239619","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016345683,0.021971721,0.005596817,0.025998691,0.001142524,0.00002668016,0.000041984193,0.000076721735,0.9287991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.648046,0.011035433,0.0028599277,0.007907441,0.0016703419,0.00012042938,0.00007727027,0.00015027811,0.32813287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754024,0.0013911756,0.000091244125,0.00019704163,0.0005576495,0.00022275337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713755,0.0020140144,0.00017134736,0.00032831164,0.00020408678,0.00014476335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001772627,0.0002060756,0.00031141465,0.0009559414,0.0041145887,0.011888302,0.0005549997,0.0025556788,0.006741879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006517338,0.00028168526,0.00020946527,0.0011171567,0.019550798,0.007003487,0.0028497363,0.003229329,0.0010285816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022555196,0.0000037893642,0.000041441835,0.000011297082,6.4535374e-7,0.00002484089,0.0020957845,0.000063227126,0.000045724522,0.98706144,0.0047800136,0.005869514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009345125,0.000015332153,0.0004739024,0.00020697262,0.000005250516,0.00007817969,0.0026943807,0.0002321792,0.00014616411,0.6321581,0.36396852,0.000011758473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076885824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010278153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011888302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004184425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004372588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030360281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W627343140","doi":"10.4324/9780203459034","title":"Representing Rape: Language and sexual consent","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":179,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Situated; Tribunal; Harassment; Sexual assault; Variety (cybernetics); Perspective (graphical); Criminology; Psychology; Construct (python library); Criminal trial; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Law; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.034021148343918534,"score_gpt":0.32790452068727843,"score_spread":0.2938833723433599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W627343140","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005118246,0.014080549,0.0071313754,0.033933733,0.0012208609,0.00006471698,0.00004229592,0.00006243765,0.9383458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38851157,0.024229886,0.0064515155,0.016781246,0.0011844671,0.0003396346,0.00013665903,0.00018833477,0.56217676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973591,0.0019454623,0.000068811496,0.00012752533,0.00034723512,0.00015172169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749905,0.0020831549,0.00007985799,0.00013785913,0.00011822343,0.0000817605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002329587,0.00034070745,0.00031017017,0.00053706265,0.0038331077,0.0065627354,0.00088231754,0.003226774,0.00688757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006000546,0.00022228048,0.00020443885,0.0009195072,0.016352795,0.008643156,0.0028349617,0.0037790143,0.0013545951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038084022,0.000005132287,0.00003537478,0.000046972604,6.0927687e-7,0.00010011623,0.014789625,0.00007440595,0.00006094733,0.9490113,0.02272929,0.013142422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005314552,0.0000143163215,0.00017627834,0.00037973223,0.0000017693332,0.00038224692,0.014730693,0.0001791387,0.00014731557,0.3174324,0.6665374,0.0000133599415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004221066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005348593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00688757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034073924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035232343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024722457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W629466054","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511779640","title":"Public Justice and the Anthropology of Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Appeal; Politics; Human rights; Economic Justice; Law; Public opinion; Political science; Rule of law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0338340602532181,"score_gpt":0.24972984553271652,"score_spread":0.21589578527949843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W629466054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048633604,0.08177885,0.00431802,0.120330386,0.0020507863,0.00002490528,0.000024600295,0.00006732704,0.7865417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67071176,0.06369227,0.0042148777,0.039795637,0.0059103905,0.00020131223,0.00008536617,0.000223671,0.21516478],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983581,0.0010721287,0.000032383505,0.00013946895,0.00025010377,0.00014788032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863666,0.0009968167,0.000077505116,0.00014282615,0.00007130722,0.00007483951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017333423,0.00048276802,0.00034743058,0.0015232597,0.0054880176,0.008691473,0.0006889799,0.0038779909,0.006635887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028798715,0.00022444033,0.000284117,0.0015787324,0.037009433,0.011658762,0.003353493,0.0047687865,0.0008481357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013738558,0.000008376355,0.00003110381,0.000020807522,8.3384765e-7,0.00001898808,0.002160366,0.00003812794,0.000018296063,0.98359203,0.008505827,0.0056039635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003332015,0.000007173751,0.00012572286,0.00016512614,0.0000019414667,0.000059988484,0.003223297,0.00007526424,0.000039144143,0.63502157,0.3612739,0.0000036975052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031265246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004292184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008691473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046486235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003505367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0337283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W654045787","doi":"","title":"The Holocaust's Ghost: Writings on Art, Politics, Law and Education ed. by F.C. DeCoste, Bernard Schwartz (review)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Holocaust; Politics; Law; Philosophy; History; Classics; Art history; Political science","score_opus":0.005845931477772041,"score_gpt":0.2405795237123479,"score_spread":0.23473359223457585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W654045787","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000038847094,0.99313146,0.000027955442,0.0049029374,0.0007723108,7.9369454e-7,0.000009019786,0.000002524007,0.0011140675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010341863,0.9950589,0.00005056581,0.0014408426,0.0010802733,0.0000044611684,0.00001551076,0.0000048082734,0.0013105059],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991335,0.0003020187,0.000050112678,0.00007483063,0.00036842446,0.0000711595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969104,0.002036194,0.00029548575,0.00007975198,0.00044591792,0.00023238041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022525727,0.0014094757,0.0020885854,0.00582564,0.0022115496,0.005242436,0.0015584298,0.00295229,0.0078015686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048408844,0.00073761906,0.0005537859,0.008341105,0.0069903443,0.0061388807,0.002236031,0.0032963257,0.0031456726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031299063,0.000016845286,0.00025465805,0.0051379926,0.00004843821,0.00019135461,0.002901492,0.00015347707,0.00009621134,0.024323106,0.7228302,0.24401508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000659427,0.000008261553,0.0008873739,0.0071498062,0.000014864727,0.00030237855,0.0014075695,0.000014477576,0.00004085448,0.007258947,0.9828965,0.000012334438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020712692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054929256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020712692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040077227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009265242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041184306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W67847504","doi":"","title":"Anderson, E., Judging Bertha Wilson, Law as Large as Life (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001). Aristodemou, M., Law and Literature (Oxford: OUP, 2000). Beveridge, F., Nott, S. and Stephen, K., eds., Making Women Count: Integrating Gender into Law and Policy Making (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.011188507005648968,"score_gpt":0.2722855870445248,"score_spread":0.2610970800388759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W67847504","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008700382,0.85944796,0.0013601928,0.076109245,0.0028039843,0.000027716695,0.00057350646,0.00009342091,0.05871398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058794606,0.83142215,0.0043571857,0.015792012,0.002403434,0.0000939993,0.00048198906,0.00022786381,0.08642684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986952,0.00037980132,0.00011833292,0.00011505075,0.0005175889,0.00017396583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597746,0.0018417649,0.00036526273,0.00012111897,0.0011607129,0.0005338085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002377723,0.001618821,0.0007361731,0.005627204,0.008744934,0.007110355,0.0018697602,0.0066379714,0.022585422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053438847,0.0012996583,0.00048619212,0.00728339,0.008401334,0.011206073,0.0018730109,0.0048013995,0.0074656806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023212962,0.000014510601,0.00055850117,0.00042759537,0.000009392141,0.00012626308,0.008140001,0.000109990186,0.000080143895,0.060383968,0.88517195,0.044954482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010606312,0.000008314216,0.004553836,0.0012340425,0.000016891972,0.00015871621,0.005420358,0.00006269752,0.0001606522,0.036059942,0.95228153,0.000032434677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5247932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7981385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5247932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021380847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016679978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95601076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6888361383","doi":"10.20381/ruor-30937","title":"Discipliné et dominé par un ordre social performé : Observation de l'évènement-procès au sein des tribunaux canadiens","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"University of Ottawa - Library","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social distance; Social representation; Social relation","score_opus":0.02508406094034649,"score_gpt":0.25036863537920667,"score_spread":0.22528457443886019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6888361383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9733767,0.00047501622,0.00041518552,0.0008673182,0.000025117264,0.000046391404,0.000047896534,0.000013594622,0.0247329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881726,0.00031140682,0.0002407396,0.00010631471,0.000010153751,0.000033387045,0.000023270868,0.000010537358,0.0110916775],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997519,0.0011310166,0.000059714494,0.00022044936,0.0004199663,0.00064986624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965829,0.0015338307,0.0003293354,0.00021602752,0.0005923008,0.0007455576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025844504,0.0003692299,0.0005668068,0.0025956922,0.022206012,0.006719351,0.0014211405,0.0017745856,0.0040606004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005962858,0.00041311246,0.00025460825,0.0039132396,0.01745482,0.002022983,0.0060790433,0.0022589637,0.00060087733],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009890198,0.000008171105,0.0020308113,0.000019990775,0.0000015095146,0.00028013304,0.9931727,0.000010632006,0.00025201746,0.0014568503,0.00019998755,0.0025572032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014512764,0.00001547426,0.010206634,0.000030907147,0.000002456042,0.000089165136,0.97536284,0.000017763556,0.00012491924,0.00031667214,0.013821143,0.000010534961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3500358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.509286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6499642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010502809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009780213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6959967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6893687154","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4111808","title":"Suspect numéro un (2020) Film ▶ HD !Complet En Francais ~ Streaming Vf Entier 4k. yyo","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suspect; Video recording; Motor area","score_opus":0.029095994446421844,"score_gpt":0.25259033253619473,"score_spread":0.22349433808977287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6893687154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014782598,0.00032291812,0.0008482021,0.0010342912,0.0017730914,0.0002164722,0.019186798,0.008141976,0.966998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003955202,0.00029986934,0.0007960032,0.0003118139,0.00016469813,0.000066990855,0.0081900675,0.003109391,0.98310596],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979645,0.00000984408,0.0000062866225,0.00003393768,0.000090223504,0.00006329941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989705,0.00005284187,0.000024405199,0.00010496631,0.00047930915,0.00036790234],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027472642,0.00081915583,0.00038272038,0.0008864753,0.002003829,0.0035801,0.0008134821,0.0010314106,0.90796274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013635656,0.0004890598,0.00046338452,0.0008421258,0.00026073054,0.002938448,0.0019769922,0.0010788614,0.7687358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038403974,0.000011938891,0.00008918341,0.000056388042,0.0000017459698,0.00002999528,0.000056428766,0.000015764012,0.0004779616,0.00046455234,0.9815072,0.017250545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013293219,0.000014773816,0.0010069982,0.000050010352,0.000002731797,0.00005227906,0.00014193248,0.000060485534,0.00043981275,0.0001407243,0.9980677,0.000009260986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025841217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075881034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09203726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012545479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006575885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6911118388","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10798567","title":"Décrire le droit... et le transformer. Essai sur la décriture du droit.","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demotion; Context (archaeology); Espionage","score_opus":0.01563252973731944,"score_gpt":0.2690404413219948,"score_spread":0.25340791158467535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6911118388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02562011,0.017554203,0.04660779,0.07706783,0.0025784336,0.000104844265,0.00034712817,0.0001902109,0.8299294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6489074,0.013206736,0.014199789,0.011117558,0.0009025671,0.00016739506,0.00029791263,0.0005979936,0.3106026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966826,0.0015191745,0.00010040761,0.0005380253,0.00088420365,0.00027564302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978205,0.00090027467,0.00018634237,0.00034284883,0.0005911751,0.00015882474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032168834,0.00067583355,0.00034246597,0.001582788,0.0054872157,0.01013662,0.0012991182,0.003570241,0.017514817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052689384,0.0004166275,0.0006350109,0.0014111982,0.024480576,0.013829556,0.0043215253,0.006909045,0.0036324712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012444304,0.0000050738586,0.00022319306,0.00006618913,0.0000037390025,0.000099131,0.012363617,0.000080971964,0.0002901679,0.97180927,0.0061497064,0.008896398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014671046,0.000028960436,0.0009740165,0.0006155028,0.000015395357,0.00039283518,0.02017701,0.00038359957,0.0010974084,0.25688785,0.7193684,0.000044309018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024121925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027167147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024121925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008182645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006951033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059369504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6911225857","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10798568","title":"Décrire le droit... et le transformer. Essai sur la décriture du droit.","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demotion; Context (archaeology); Espionage","score_opus":0.028058498066174702,"score_gpt":0.25987622244203357,"score_spread":0.23181772437585887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6911225857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02562011,0.017554203,0.04660779,0.07706783,0.0025784336,0.000104844265,0.00034712817,0.0001902109,0.8299294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6489074,0.013206736,0.014199789,0.011117558,0.0009025671,0.00016739506,0.00029791263,0.0005979936,0.3106026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966826,0.0015191745,0.00010040761,0.0005380253,0.00088420365,0.00027564302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978205,0.00090027467,0.00018634237,0.00034284883,0.0005911751,0.00015882474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032168834,0.00067583355,0.00034246597,0.001582788,0.0054872157,0.01013662,0.0012991182,0.003570241,0.017514817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052689384,0.0004166275,0.0006350109,0.0014111982,0.024480576,0.013829556,0.0043215253,0.006909045,0.0036324712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012444304,0.0000050738586,0.00022319306,0.00006618913,0.0000037390025,0.000099131,0.012363617,0.000080971964,0.0002901679,0.97180927,0.0061497064,0.008896398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014671046,0.000028960436,0.0009740165,0.0006155028,0.000015395357,0.00039283518,0.02017701,0.00038359957,0.0010974084,0.25688785,0.7193684,0.000044309018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024121925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027167147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024121925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008182645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006951033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059369504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931090879","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4461863","title":"~#ReGarDer~Le Film (2021) FILM Complet HD En Francais Streaming vf dwl","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Documentary film; Video recording; Film festival","score_opus":0.029257847209456254,"score_gpt":0.2588167047358459,"score_spread":0.22955885752638963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931090879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009978366,0.00045283596,0.0006235575,0.0022560817,0.0021958458,0.00019272158,0.014694872,0.004110631,0.97447556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003373271,0.00043790697,0.0005451078,0.00053237675,0.00019319048,0.000062233754,0.005145906,0.0019056574,0.9878044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997646,0.000017102908,0.000007586981,0.00003318595,0.00010530312,0.00007207271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989064,0.000076083925,0.00002900403,0.00008699022,0.0005104028,0.00039110883],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028487298,0.0006886212,0.00027987617,0.0008273236,0.0023041866,0.0036758867,0.00072148023,0.0011132016,0.8980804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017628303,0.00039966888,0.0004172714,0.0008774277,0.00030574686,0.0033881438,0.0021510485,0.0014710706,0.7195661],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000098244045,0.0000051982424,0.000059370348,0.000039831437,7.624452e-7,0.000025640653,0.000067424946,0.0000064554006,0.00015510953,0.0004011072,0.9886557,0.010573589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048834722,0.00000547616,0.000645975,0.000049863553,0.000001223878,0.00005082894,0.00020332992,0.000020155652,0.00015753903,0.000091074755,0.99876416,0.000005497651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038834784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1076464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10191959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013579677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009227193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1453759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6936667070","doi":"10.58079/o89u","title":"The Transcribathon in Summary","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Selection (genetic algorithm); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.017658800951580258,"score_gpt":0.26718899540639973,"score_spread":0.24953019445481947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6936667070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028043217,0.0005276913,0.018631214,0.0056283395,0.04272233,0.002103279,0.08711324,0.045327272,0.7951423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008332606,0.00031624126,0.009535876,0.00140908,0.0040574926,0.0015700029,0.032024857,0.016469188,0.9262847],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987233,0.0002603111,0.00008062539,0.00023424256,0.0005518222,0.00014968264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99312073,0.0011724876,0.00015443913,0.0012792109,0.003132912,0.0011401178],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015634923,0.0014947498,0.0009808242,0.0019850857,0.002644758,0.00504243,0.0013179635,0.0012830145,0.75123215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010447383,0.00059432274,0.00056874176,0.0015053857,0.00059073686,0.0024240217,0.0036155786,0.0022713048,0.661699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068459136,0.000011881345,0.00003807208,0.000084546235,0.0000010726118,0.00003770443,0.00012817934,0.000020149035,0.00045495082,0.00037326588,0.97364026,0.025141448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028733219,0.000030860334,0.0005625289,0.00008528454,0.0000024717963,0.000060255417,0.00041469064,0.00013968714,0.00071363,0.0007779221,0.9971621,0.000021799062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00233266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052425577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75123215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096964533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015434647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35483712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6939255221","doi":"10.6068/dp14ba816a14483","title":"Trend 1986 - 2011. Statistics Canada. CANSIM: International Trade - Merchandise Exports | Country: Canada | Table: Merchandise imports and exports, by major groups and principal trading areas for all countries | Variable: Customs, Exports, Other countries (x 1,000,000) | Units: $CAD, 1986-2011. Data-Planet™ Statistical Ready Reference by Conquest Systems, Inc. Dataset-ID: 075-001-130.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Data Planet","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Official statistics; Economic statistics; Census; Summary statistics; Statistical analysis; China; Descriptive statistics","score_opus":0.023430525171446587,"score_gpt":0.26022827727440645,"score_spread":0.23679775210295986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6939255221","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005301538,0.000043850687,0.00001639895,0.00007824465,0.000018867177,0.0000075321054,0.998928,0.000046128698,0.00080788817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00063377613,0.00021365266,0.00020788598,0.000073684656,0.00001111669,0.000050069713,0.995611,0.00006560527,0.003133114],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969729,0.00015443566,0.00028432815,0.00043117406,0.0014213494,0.0007358746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977702,0.00077171024,0.0008411891,0.00068230217,0.018978572,0.0010242579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013762867,0.002428152,0.0021909166,0.009050319,0.002914967,0.0047849286,0.004183952,0.0012684042,0.075171396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013044123,0.0013757227,0.0016495452,0.041586783,0.0006349177,0.0024408218,0.0019200012,0.0025997185,0.0510588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020975229,0.0000054961706,0.0009759473,0.00020012366,0.000017538301,0.000008031763,0.000017786411,0.00012467959,0.000009341458,0.00042174594,0.99688905,0.0013092902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008927069,0.000008337724,0.017955475,0.0006198857,0.000046275713,0.000024576988,0.00036296307,0.0004102932,0.00018362192,0.00048254602,0.9797505,0.00006619505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99125844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075171396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040149324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.097966395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29130512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6967078093","doi":"10.5061/dryad.q2bvq83r1","title":"Chum salmon baseline for the Western Alaska Salmon Stock Identification Program","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Baseline (sea); Stock (firearms); Population; Peninsula; Stock assessment; Fish stock; Fish <Actinopterygii>","score_opus":0.07273550324477457,"score_gpt":0.39793850060546815,"score_spread":0.3252029973606936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6967078093","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016514335,0.000027943015,0.00016120417,0.00004273347,0.000013022634,0.000049638395,0.9966808,0.0000826769,0.0012905893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00219543,0.000017018354,0.0006188109,0.000025561465,0.0000036078447,0.00033058922,0.99586415,0.000019020812,0.00092568586],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991303,0.00011656488,0.00013465271,0.00027208272,0.00024092461,0.00010545452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967437,0.00038371177,0.00036060894,0.0005309538,0.001732239,0.00024865402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019096241,0.00055529946,0.0006962516,0.0019492602,0.00096323015,0.0009417807,0.0015462855,0.0007595862,0.02289591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005233087,0.0004596646,0.00044137763,0.0038689922,0.00023003774,0.0006938372,0.0010148871,0.0010934997,0.016099142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001834019,0.00009397944,0.030023092,0.00054377154,0.00008098482,0.00007637042,0.00013942199,0.0006910092,0.0002474737,0.001282014,0.9561075,0.0105309915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029013606,0.00005616161,0.12275265,0.00049724634,0.000070802904,0.00008050459,0.00047210537,0.0010449188,0.0005964907,0.0010269628,0.87306124,0.000050751438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.109965384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17202574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109965384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018277655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035258252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21865064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6968088848","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.12502814","title":"modèle de plan daffaire agricole pdf","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plan (archaeology); Business plan; Financial plan; Marshall Plan","score_opus":0.05975451996734196,"score_gpt":0.25142598461349464,"score_spread":0.19167146464615267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6968088848","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018069252,0.0012712784,0.63412255,0.00503461,0.0006752146,0.00028856724,0.015224223,0.0034910196,0.32182327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42466384,0.0021782173,0.22270344,0.00088865,0.00021137924,0.0009626404,0.012685046,0.0014809999,0.33422577],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946374,0.00012912882,0.000020974043,0.00013221384,0.00017343104,0.000080466234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989342,0.0004892471,0.00006657674,0.00009145183,0.00035132514,0.00006717465],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090922316,0.00079797034,0.0005889511,0.0010358898,0.0007948951,0.0037598263,0.001677193,0.0019157778,0.08071305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003686627,0.0006782257,0.0015204374,0.0011899151,0.0006375433,0.002677194,0.0011326725,0.0015052331,0.011378416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088872475,0.000052502408,0.0015824431,0.00015543404,0.00003625661,0.00018309052,0.00011515429,0.67103094,0.0005989457,0.24547407,0.03837298,0.042309318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000453868,0.00003053025,0.0006121069,0.000101871,0.00002917067,0.000101792626,0.00009865827,0.8218992,0.00042242886,0.08828433,0.08834345,0.000031133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046953168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0375808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91928697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00319452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033116778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27001202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6968547975","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4127591","title":"[HD]~ Streaming vf Fonzo (2020) Film COmplet VOSTFR En Gratuit far","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fusible alloy; Staring; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.04103634452276465,"score_gpt":0.2641610479020584,"score_spread":0.22312470337929374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6968547975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004265403,0.00031682823,0.0014169023,0.0009206534,0.0016316512,0.00017437065,0.016838852,0.011148664,0.9671254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004363776,0.00050781923,0.0016704289,0.00061354024,0.00044846872,0.00013447744,0.014554949,0.0069609634,0.9707456],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997751,0.000019673485,0.0000071313416,0.000037165755,0.00010374146,0.000057240086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928075,0.00005738013,0.000020777563,0.000114123155,0.000313225,0.00021391278],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032316986,0.0009967283,0.0003599912,0.0010924471,0.0017235744,0.0040993337,0.0011317779,0.0011867976,0.89385664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017774709,0.000607803,0.00047841854,0.0012141041,0.00029499002,0.0040122326,0.0025911184,0.0014322154,0.7255105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016062548,0.0000037519555,0.00003207408,0.00003500973,0.000001024224,0.000017541772,0.000032212636,0.000012518271,0.0001670036,0.0005490228,0.98823035,0.010903508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009309709,0.0000050593853,0.0003332185,0.00004264769,0.0000017091123,0.000044347213,0.0000718026,0.0000505565,0.00013317158,0.00023626002,0.99906474,0.0000071201607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016005235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037227597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106143355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096905656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006061167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1514005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980232505","doi":"","title":"Bieber gives impromptu performance at Toronto bar","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Internet Archive (Internet Archive)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impromptu; Bar (unit); Basketball; Piano; Star (game theory)","score_opus":0.010404730355534669,"score_gpt":0.2605950433671295,"score_spread":0.25019031301159483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980232505","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014864093,0.0009912882,0.00017889398,0.003794561,0.0010998748,0.000043657157,0.0010143747,0.00031237295,0.9910787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0052572414,0.0003556603,0.00009981682,0.00029066185,0.000093206996,0.000011750224,0.0003060515,0.00011048893,0.993475],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932504,0.00005184073,0.000015290776,0.000076865486,0.00033084492,0.000200239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833506,0.00007349748,0.000036079517,0.000107540385,0.0005346574,0.00091314],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005265167,0.0007678132,0.00031992138,0.0012344597,0.010125751,0.0044143316,0.0006867249,0.0014312105,0.5378517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015963354,0.00036003065,0.0002555387,0.0013371859,0.0014467707,0.0022352685,0.0034021065,0.0019764889,0.13222565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017887238,0.000015913016,0.00023915245,0.000037038626,0.000001708228,0.0001028786,0.00086446776,0.000020409447,0.00018408871,0.0051481654,0.97830075,0.0150674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002090392,0.000004275325,0.00076711556,0.00002643795,7.2655394e-7,0.000025037158,0.0006433613,0.0000147028995,0.00007870785,0.00014090097,0.998293,0.0000037058755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44507802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8402624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4621483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010316413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8849747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986742771","doi":"","title":"Reframing Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence at the Intersections of Law &amp; Society","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Liability; Personality; Interpersonal communication; Interpersonal violence","score_opus":0.025528115240770703,"score_gpt":0.2862054576377596,"score_spread":0.2606773423969889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986742771","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39560983,0.0053680004,0.030892577,0.07718805,0.0039579356,0.000168204,0.00015307701,0.00033410775,0.48632824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958297,0.0018969709,0.0025236565,0.0035239502,0.00042178936,0.0001841665,0.000038640857,0.0001443396,0.032969505],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481624,0.0033452234,0.000073610674,0.00034357258,0.0006648277,0.00075653073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932801,0.0049091806,0.0003974677,0.00050689717,0.0002613218,0.00064498215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046674344,0.00055933604,0.000500818,0.0020643568,0.016600166,0.018854327,0.0029395656,0.0046783797,0.011651479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008969919,0.0003769071,0.00055138307,0.001467233,0.029562585,0.012292765,0.018270714,0.005566733,0.0009933496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019769284,0.00006404027,0.0015466467,0.00012336623,0.0000083429795,0.0012248671,0.6830315,0.00020382917,0.00093552325,0.27279782,0.013983216,0.026061088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071366226,0.00006346642,0.0017083744,0.00030386783,0.000009128027,0.00058524124,0.5725758,0.00040775284,0.00084706745,0.04284725,0.38061628,0.000028621072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007987738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01652861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018854327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008266073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038312913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05997485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987028497","doi":"","title":"[Rezension von: Picturing punishment : the spectacle and material afterlife of the criminal body in the Dutch Republic / Anuradha Gobin. - Toronto : University of Toronto Press, 2021]","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spectacle; Afterlife; Punishment (psychology); Criminal justice; Criminal behaviour","score_opus":0.009501424044781692,"score_gpt":0.2314642004735722,"score_spread":0.2219627764287905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987028497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069273813,0.27403677,0.0015144548,0.098461375,0.006672046,0.00011414966,0.003305789,0.00018140482,0.6087867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13219757,0.09799055,0.001142661,0.016145825,0.001930847,0.0002849927,0.0013351105,0.0004100873,0.7485623],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993698,0.000195513,0.000044453463,0.000059670074,0.00017920743,0.00015142403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996661,0.00014848911,0.000049956914,0.000019994537,0.00008036848,0.00003514234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061689224,0.0010959781,0.00039770606,0.001323601,0.0047963844,0.00395113,0.0015865028,0.0049143517,0.038014386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002075728,0.00048299495,0.00032878388,0.0028902087,0.0037749272,0.0044388827,0.0016707758,0.0027338306,0.007894378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003005968,0.0000138867545,0.00022039529,0.00041359742,0.000006818551,0.00032500635,0.00955691,0.00009914327,0.00014748654,0.08647224,0.866048,0.0366665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001160578,0.0000065363374,0.002933662,0.00048176397,0.000006436983,0.00030602727,0.0057348907,0.000057678437,0.00021712901,0.007213863,0.98300916,0.000021243497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27022403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49911138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27022403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056694914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00544682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5373023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990580985","doi":"","title":"Droits et voix / Rights and Voices","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"book","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Legislation; Subject (documents); Proposition","score_opus":0.020535607079237125,"score_gpt":0.2846422705171606,"score_spread":0.2641066634379235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990580985","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015378197,0.0062455237,0.000295221,0.005825056,0.00086664956,0.000010708272,0.000052712137,0.000027054788,0.9851392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04809287,0.003400108,0.0001305711,0.0014998008,0.00032769926,0.000019168077,0.000055041182,0.00007424613,0.94640046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991061,0.00020245608,0.000028620525,0.00012381442,0.00029113918,0.00024794205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956733,0.00012023862,0.000029705594,0.00009756582,0.000101620695,0.00008354133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006708468,0.00052204815,0.00028402766,0.0008417748,0.0059904945,0.008831964,0.00074050634,0.0022147717,0.04101898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018408307,0.00028482493,0.0002570361,0.0010194513,0.00945899,0.006919339,0.003669246,0.00314731,0.0091973655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011386346,0.0000063621137,0.00012428121,0.00004385436,0.0000016897972,0.000093698116,0.008531575,0.00003334387,0.00011314121,0.82798237,0.14174032,0.021318056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016486146,0.0000026847665,0.00015326208,0.00010543247,0.000001091795,0.00006002974,0.0030005472,0.000014400805,0.000058107904,0.017026862,0.9795725,0.0000035837652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07354841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12286918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07354841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006953064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043281657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14624059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991102395","doi":"","title":"Fabulous law: legal fables","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Hyporeflexia; Pretext; Subpoena","score_opus":0.03502023769151687,"score_gpt":0.2889965366324277,"score_spread":0.25397629894091084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991102395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058194365,0.012603758,0.037448265,0.06544539,0.0009644482,0.00005606319,0.0001104063,0.00034824162,0.824829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95134085,0.0014985064,0.004949801,0.0058108056,0.00026073708,0.000059966376,0.00004195445,0.000113512106,0.035923786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559516,0.0029747107,0.00008468454,0.000350078,0.00061540696,0.0003799698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99547464,0.0027968737,0.00038378354,0.0006331946,0.00046267975,0.00024886944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042962353,0.0005672719,0.00035129942,0.0016251536,0.008615874,0.012602103,0.0013759984,0.0042905114,0.0065092538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013542452,0.00027130538,0.00036922516,0.0011787439,0.05217691,0.011542167,0.0056843837,0.005017104,0.0007614869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030319113,0.000002443359,0.000057330035,0.000010815196,8.033788e-7,0.00007809483,0.023320347,0.00004500049,0.000048127145,0.97171515,0.0027689347,0.0019499576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015014305,0.000017359687,0.00053956296,0.00025560503,0.0000052737346,0.00039005865,0.038712285,0.00050289853,0.00035713596,0.5443958,0.41478372,0.000025379506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011372277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0115654245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012602103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00882336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029287057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06401831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6993057720","doi":"","title":"\\n Jabaroot\\n : Correspondances complices. \\n Jabaroot, Canada [Québec], 2002, 58 minutes","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Perspective (graphical); Face (sociological concept); Work (physics); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.005865495500188527,"score_gpt":0.17446169366519595,"score_spread":0.16859619816500743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6993057720","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001995232,0.0326344,0.000949166,0.1034381,0.04125652,0.0006726494,0.028973358,0.00248765,0.7875929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017659403,0.0015585134,0.00012990336,0.0047961227,0.0006030678,0.00007068438,0.001097385,0.00025409795,0.9897243],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992042,0.000069909525,0.00003696614,0.00011538758,0.00036750897,0.00020614914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981458,0.00019852616,0.00006208974,0.00006733661,0.0011727815,0.00035343727],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011028874,0.0011312234,0.0007633472,0.001237596,0.010659167,0.004356895,0.0015786655,0.0052469317,0.3526256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041565835,0.0008332934,0.00055549503,0.0027057994,0.0010889729,0.0018038875,0.0016243482,0.0035106007,0.14060986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048772304,0.0000022014112,0.000043504373,0.000012223038,4.1918378e-7,0.00001264037,0.000039503288,0.0000065440495,0.00001504957,0.00015225307,0.998069,0.0016417839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038811518,0.0000014212287,0.0008052294,0.000034892142,9.412177e-7,0.000006601633,0.00020365426,0.000011617407,0.00001564501,0.000054488413,0.9988569,0.0000048002307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9061581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96932936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3526256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016320566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022064548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.923401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996998395","doi":"","title":"The Transmutation of Visceral Desecration: Marginalizing Women, Murder and the Urban Environment Contextualized in Film","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Experiential learning; Dismemberment; Movie theater; Narrative; Short Film; Gesture","score_opus":0.003279729870872585,"score_gpt":0.19293855797787468,"score_spread":0.1896588281070021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996998395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.881963,0.004363787,0.0008703689,0.012610767,0.0002561241,0.000048076585,0.000055081506,0.000020732175,0.09981212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99319685,0.0012672953,0.00011228876,0.00046873407,0.00004023039,0.000016658909,0.0000139858075,0.000020149111,0.004863679],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959233,0.0029406883,0.000057173216,0.00020825662,0.00029144512,0.0005790456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974752,0.0015128774,0.00032099825,0.00013130983,0.00020105745,0.00035848553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020642027,0.0006049215,0.00048351157,0.0011844458,0.01938724,0.013044478,0.0014119416,0.001966172,0.004088726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053955903,0.00044101893,0.00019740625,0.0011925232,0.039504625,0.0047174646,0.007950538,0.004176023,0.00030225646],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012378722,0.0000092833125,0.00077246147,0.00004582428,0.000002662647,0.0003352119,0.988947,0.000012322186,0.00016998415,0.0074895243,0.00063654035,0.0015668967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019635452,0.000010654175,0.0014539171,0.00009803248,0.0000044706726,0.00017938727,0.9696767,0.000015167437,0.0001117177,0.00071452564,0.02772819,0.000005325881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066551276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12718403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066551276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008479171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035889037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1323278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997177345","doi":"","title":"Virtual court hearings: judicial perspective from Ontario judgments","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Adjudication; Economic Justice; Court of record; Trial court; Control (management); Judicial review; Supreme court","score_opus":0.027835526225732554,"score_gpt":0.2922698539073549,"score_spread":0.26443432768162234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997177345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7428408,0.004983688,0.0016029207,0.035656907,0.0002482766,0.00019158269,0.0011602532,0.000024446485,0.21329106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826987,0.0023472426,0.00055345707,0.0022638198,0.00006802852,0.000054444357,0.00018871616,0.000021519721,0.011804039],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852136,0.003565635,0.0007428541,0.001435805,0.0065090596,0.0025330766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701057,0.015994499,0.0034443596,0.0011252584,0.0073800753,0.00195013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008611134,0.00030401882,0.00046961597,0.0036957136,0.03193369,0.01281348,0.0021655313,0.0024718295,0.004136886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031855218,0.0005854476,0.00028824457,0.008025045,0.018468471,0.0041045053,0.004956221,0.002983707,0.00030948903],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008579881,0.000054401877,0.02431467,0.00038164473,0.000031817242,0.002260105,0.82216895,0.000405338,0.001396077,0.10247078,0.02397425,0.022456175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000152417115,0.000037810943,0.061650023,0.00075389445,0.00004650386,0.00026169178,0.7104342,0.0006596563,0.0006206967,0.009752756,0.21564282,0.00012472097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95429367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9822276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12683111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12683111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10647142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9202285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6997371972","doi":"","title":"Victim Services’ Implementation of Mobile Tracking Systems for Victims of High-Risk Gender-Based Violence Cases in Ontario","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UWSpace (University of Waterloo)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Regional Municipality of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Law enforcement; Tracking system; Mobile device; Mobile technology; Service provider; Context (archaeology); Government (linguistics); Tracking (education)","score_opus":0.02012938065067845,"score_gpt":0.26653071276324003,"score_spread":0.24640133211256157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6997371972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96016693,0.0012371179,0.0005935157,0.011503721,0.00009371225,0.0004461238,0.00048216255,0.000033285163,0.02544335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806559,0.0029002868,0.0007888012,0.0019155296,0.000025890125,0.00026505292,0.0001673132,0.00003635738,0.013244959],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953294,0.0014752307,0.00029105885,0.00028091753,0.0015201011,0.0011033252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99102575,0.003333013,0.0019345626,0.0003096372,0.0020554797,0.0013415233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034342944,0.00021710474,0.00042260718,0.0017361086,0.014023529,0.0037695516,0.0016146194,0.0010012406,0.00415759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014710641,0.0005743779,0.00029036755,0.0031803332,0.0060845693,0.0018389577,0.0038424104,0.0012456516,0.00033898428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021365267,0.000031037758,0.019440386,0.0003595226,0.0000045542233,0.0017830225,0.9586745,0.00003229522,0.00079927174,0.0022228993,0.0046565123,0.011974634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026537339,0.000026585201,0.020056453,0.000246605,0.000006487932,0.00023740777,0.94445926,0.000047755344,0.00017378386,0.00011560371,0.034611464,0.00001585455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8820477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9547787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11795229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056977168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10268171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41340023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999448249","doi":"","title":"Continuing the Dialogue","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Economic Justice; Event (particle physics); Work (physics); Stakeholder; Evening; EXPOSE","score_opus":0.02158865514902723,"score_gpt":0.25087062750215344,"score_spread":0.22928197235312622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999448249","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015458754,0.0060295532,0.013968937,0.78044826,0.06365412,0.000592468,0.0004912561,0.0008406947,0.11851606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23634753,0.0047719134,0.02099547,0.40813777,0.0220572,0.0018361808,0.0010323727,0.0018881627,0.30293345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95975894,0.020509375,0.0010733156,0.0042606588,0.006496357,0.007901343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9279022,0.012992094,0.001654255,0.0042828633,0.015066085,0.038102593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02826018,0.0014796349,0.0013271841,0.0017341387,0.041829057,0.020755298,0.004915686,0.018198274,0.047140613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057477586,0.0008896412,0.0016311846,0.0010460588,0.015636932,0.023128474,0.026747141,0.037136603,0.0152039565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007644799,0.00014232003,0.0005423133,0.00017870587,0.000014864253,0.001153489,0.15186009,0.00010895895,0.0014977921,0.080292396,0.731343,0.03278966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006581697,0.000018009025,0.00014185108,0.000088313674,0.000002356386,0.00009842872,0.0361743,0.00004076873,0.00006888635,0.006382057,0.9569591,0.00001942916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025247047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043044418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047140613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016354205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035130087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15770113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7000451791","doi":"","title":"Ferreira Da Cunha, Paulo, Droit et récit (Les Presses de l'Université Laval, Québec, 2003), 164 págs","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Americanae (AECID Library)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Durvalumab","score_opus":0.010120016679338817,"score_gpt":0.23138391114210138,"score_spread":0.22126389446276257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7000451791","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043960023,0.70163095,0.00078874064,0.06820187,0.012309778,0.00008447325,0.011119478,0.00030207876,0.20116661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054622952,0.21737148,0.0013633798,0.005852865,0.0035758517,0.00016587882,0.002866423,0.00034767707,0.7138336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993654,0.00008935947,0.000040761966,0.00006809387,0.00026513252,0.00017120349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981,0.00046020997,0.000102828926,0.00009698376,0.0010726051,0.00016737756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009983449,0.0013030507,0.00095186924,0.0052390327,0.007529187,0.008680166,0.0015845485,0.0027268934,0.08562855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033512914,0.00073660613,0.0006013941,0.012323575,0.0020168638,0.0039231386,0.0011416542,0.002345952,0.010093292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003063099,0.000021856267,0.0012468889,0.0004910959,0.000017230619,0.00007164692,0.002619444,0.000091414455,0.00011052355,0.018409727,0.93572843,0.041161064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007515649,0.000004635661,0.011210008,0.000618736,0.0000165333,0.000059153226,0.00217774,0.000048813028,0.000072569215,0.0011758674,0.984594,0.000014363737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95560735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08562855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034230497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03218679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.286456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006397362","doi":"","title":"Transformation of civil justice. Unity and diversity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Research Publications (Maastricht University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Law Foundation of Nova Scotia","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Transformation (genetics); Variety (cybernetics); Field (mathematics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.10284490174895167,"score_gpt":0.3406262148214667,"score_spread":0.23778131307251504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006397362","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031984267,0.027072784,0.00067406,0.015610037,0.0007297824,0.00002371206,0.00004660016,0.00003098886,0.95261365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3269655,0.012351002,0.0010048812,0.004890136,0.0013408955,0.00010179978,0.0001276215,0.0001410996,0.65307707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810284,0.00065116124,0.00006280072,0.00021839041,0.0005253543,0.0004394635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994222,0.00016880316,0.00006206854,0.000122012505,0.00010124476,0.00012370531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011957752,0.0005994784,0.00065392023,0.0016467551,0.0054008695,0.013462112,0.001314985,0.004307211,0.018605068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027150759,0.00031614472,0.00026070618,0.0026211417,0.023046652,0.005904586,0.0057498813,0.0037124397,0.0034485266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004921568,0.000016870708,0.000036196165,0.00004696441,0.00000210777,0.000029286588,0.0030814502,0.00007185887,0.000043401444,0.9477127,0.02879049,0.020163802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009452859,0.000009343522,0.00057875505,0.00019913363,0.0000036809417,0.00008727516,0.0026965658,0.000082075756,0.00009659541,0.4786189,0.5176104,0.000007785928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032536883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050710477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032536883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012675156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0096196635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09196508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008830596","doi":"","title":"The Corporation Ten Years On: An Interview and an Audience with Joel Bakan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Keele Research Repository (Keele University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Scholarship; Power (physics); Filmmaking; Resource (disambiguation); Witness; Interview","score_opus":0.10663980669357125,"score_gpt":0.34687693255776514,"score_spread":0.24023712586419388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008830596","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41397646,0.0136378035,0.001109455,0.47254258,0.005325615,0.00029082794,0.00018839001,0.00007433208,0.09285444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80280393,0.012127595,0.00164311,0.10209364,0.0011890928,0.0003823992,0.00011966533,0.0002152703,0.07942538],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903904,0.005487307,0.00017468969,0.0006388737,0.0013548065,0.0019538382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98911804,0.0047466317,0.00047249504,0.000120414836,0.0016416658,0.0039007769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006382793,0.00088861026,0.0012234342,0.0023266077,0.058024947,0.010817403,0.002946335,0.010917686,0.0048691984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016375598,0.0013793028,0.00058491883,0.0025451572,0.016588595,0.009719683,0.0074475165,0.027233988,0.0011180232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035919504,0.0001767639,0.0006915566,0.00006956096,0.0000036736315,0.0032270835,0.95170933,0.000037109156,0.00083880493,0.0069901017,0.033366367,0.00285372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030163872,0.000036979778,0.0004797537,0.00020539376,0.0000029136377,0.0004806261,0.90209454,0.00005398645,0.00009391629,0.00035168164,0.096173905,0.000023250546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13208318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18399939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13208318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018245844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014070109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26262873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009304667","doi":"","title":"Droit et décroissance : l'exploration des possibles juridiques","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.017856258521926103,"score_gpt":0.23705160398146183,"score_spread":0.21919534545953573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009304667","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24222662,0.053986534,0.0063710557,0.16775094,0.0023027628,0.00022594568,0.00081339787,0.00012699825,0.5261957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88736176,0.01889048,0.0018115784,0.003623264,0.0006364338,0.0001531794,0.00017241486,0.00010542223,0.08724546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897786,0.0044372813,0.00035285592,0.0007831879,0.0030286016,0.0016194666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98689914,0.007649539,0.0016300016,0.000696708,0.0017974239,0.0013272042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010585081,0.00041452274,0.0005028222,0.0038134397,0.018541176,0.021610737,0.0017275901,0.003105372,0.022342497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0243054,0.0005441235,0.00049722963,0.005899564,0.024811435,0.014065492,0.011962016,0.0060676965,0.0016526073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008893689,0.000030199115,0.008633215,0.000562807,0.000016587945,0.00095876673,0.35250467,0.00035035997,0.00031652977,0.53802496,0.01910906,0.07940385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013975699,0.00004152272,0.012879616,0.0012795248,0.000013755445,0.00044792006,0.24349765,0.00012842589,0.00041849606,0.03889983,0.7023154,0.000063855725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07470546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15844218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07470546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02388202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03525095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17327696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009664401","doi":"","title":"Exploring the Canadian Judiciary's Experiences with and Perceptions of <i>Gladue</i>","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminal justice; Perception; Economic Justice; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.034790363141191695,"score_gpt":0.2323764197193588,"score_spread":0.1975860565781671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009664401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92984885,0.000938463,0.00015610753,0.020573914,0.00030275775,0.000048623268,0.00015130015,0.000018135328,0.04796193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98674494,0.00047632496,0.00012912066,0.0034666983,0.000028164037,0.000017440947,0.000065945984,0.000021211132,0.009050321],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99166554,0.0020517483,0.00019600774,0.00040762246,0.0021848213,0.0034942476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9787284,0.0030968166,0.0019336701,0.00027517465,0.005921402,0.010044563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061827297,0.00045467875,0.0005442491,0.0023239173,0.054202836,0.014024005,0.0029852947,0.0036196024,0.008870819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016785238,0.00068821217,0.00049898966,0.0031900788,0.013087053,0.0037346552,0.0060920017,0.009336777,0.00070796476],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062361425,0.000063505526,0.02035894,0.000030896004,0.000015723563,0.00041546804,0.9631062,0.000027238704,0.00025869306,0.0025791256,0.008519686,0.004562234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041607477,0.000016227326,0.015024388,0.00005813092,0.0000052450714,0.000045950495,0.96444285,0.00002635473,0.000035278503,0.0000885284,0.02022518,0.000027653861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98808527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99553597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09131945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09131945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10918309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6625721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7014062092","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Hall Law School Launches FILM – A New Visual Advocacy Initiative","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; General partnership; Legal education; Legal profession; Experiential learning; Criminal justice; Film director","score_opus":0.04009498603421838,"score_gpt":0.3138025339388636,"score_spread":0.27370754790464524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7014062092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04179684,0.0045474283,0.002988721,0.15344192,0.008265737,0.0005778088,0.0015490477,0.0013650093,0.78546757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.111237966,0.0020039184,0.0036306796,0.011665511,0.0011186028,0.00018979964,0.0010434303,0.00041387277,0.86869615],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998524,0.00022234241,0.000034667246,0.00017810459,0.0006026989,0.00043826035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969873,0.00019254834,0.00007938871,0.00014465625,0.0004204211,0.002175816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019203348,0.00040776454,0.00012700488,0.00089597324,0.008639055,0.0079800105,0.0010527555,0.003094163,0.092560254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018917865,0.00045119404,0.00030545812,0.0004947362,0.0032083858,0.003248541,0.0048817303,0.003325556,0.0064026434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036131987,0.0000973247,0.0010826997,0.000054375094,0.0000035235178,0.00033552168,0.0044727647,0.00003283063,0.0008775281,0.02350847,0.93149704,0.0380017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008182099,0.00001851157,0.0017519133,0.000032002637,0.0000013576918,0.00003531973,0.0024537533,0.000031549567,0.00017546746,0.00041758697,0.9950676,0.0000066564667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23717666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61539227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23717666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009171898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012877494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47159225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016236801","doi":"","title":"Where the Truth Lies : Faux-semblants. \\n La vérité nue Canada — Grande-Bretagne, États-Unis 2005, 108 minutes","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Demotion","score_opus":0.005288898002830223,"score_gpt":0.17178381716842805,"score_spread":0.16649491916559783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016236801","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004081145,0.14637835,0.00044661257,0.57558924,0.03075102,0.00008930411,0.0012120118,0.00027733634,0.24117495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048976257,0.01860499,0.000349394,0.04520445,0.0032156375,0.00005303227,0.0002722651,0.0002255853,0.8830983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822026,0.000343174,0.00004194829,0.00021230026,0.00047966043,0.0007025268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862325,0.00032181208,0.0000503454,0.000030570234,0.0004381902,0.00053583586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019222238,0.0009070431,0.0006417408,0.0006931359,0.027391031,0.010313527,0.0012096674,0.0083806,0.04485825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051862528,0.00068671315,0.00038347967,0.0012190203,0.005780745,0.0039790426,0.002773056,0.0071207606,0.010915314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015855228,0.0000053637214,0.0001859609,0.000032733176,0.000002361306,0.000103584294,0.0023267625,0.000016323354,0.000050099552,0.0082543185,0.98238844,0.006618233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036109677,0.0000024381704,0.00094980904,0.00012512074,0.0000021476944,0.000026062893,0.004732004,0.000014199111,0.000042435735,0.0010584317,0.9930354,0.000008397689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88672346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9745531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11327654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03284071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037174296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2382772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017473548","doi":"","title":"Art Law in Canada: Diverse Issues Surrounding the Complexity of Human Culture","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human culture; Human life; Human rights; Diversity (politics)","score_opus":0.06665051850124211,"score_gpt":0.3111510045282925,"score_spread":0.24450048602705038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017473548","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2192005,0.017251171,0.002101733,0.4238336,0.0008550359,0.000110758236,0.0007314744,0.000071473194,0.3358443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9307841,0.006240213,0.0011404214,0.025151884,0.0001445164,0.000039799816,0.000107982196,0.000079841506,0.036311254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869876,0.0020617258,0.00029667042,0.00092401553,0.00414321,0.0055868803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819135,0.0059221694,0.000669812,0.0003269036,0.0059556086,0.0052120932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006335303,0.00041815304,0.0008802547,0.0042412267,0.072575845,0.032871317,0.0051622577,0.008814911,0.011750557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020228535,0.00071053556,0.0006626362,0.008969846,0.03593302,0.0064367848,0.007664891,0.01322314,0.0004309326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066210014,0.00009610376,0.017401705,0.00023066539,0.00006552969,0.0012339902,0.1154496,0.0010977985,0.0003236059,0.6993906,0.10398033,0.060663853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032248467,0.00003221238,0.048491307,0.0010720574,0.000091243746,0.0004151216,0.38073784,0.0017113319,0.0005547405,0.08418209,0.48236495,0.0003149277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26408437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26408437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.45009598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8535578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018281833","doi":"","title":"Conference Program -- Association for the Study of Law, Culture, & the Humanities 14th Annual Conference","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Theme (computing); Humanism; Association (psychology); Legal education","score_opus":0.11556430857763804,"score_gpt":0.3381441057614282,"score_spread":0.22257979718379017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018281833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051766145,0.015060515,0.001786603,0.07800061,0.081228286,0.0009031468,0.0047743903,0.0008667708,0.81220317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013234594,0.0051817456,0.0014161579,0.00388855,0.008220948,0.0009720987,0.0027415,0.0004039806,0.9639403],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976629,0.00048040264,0.00010777146,0.00030997908,0.00086086785,0.0005781845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931263,0.0003973156,0.00016248907,0.00033440898,0.0024614977,0.003518147],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054907687,0.001274597,0.0008205352,0.0019597355,0.0045997347,0.00809553,0.0017575903,0.003104507,0.34617838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045327693,0.00043695583,0.0007086273,0.0016247164,0.00086634536,0.0036677313,0.0063524847,0.0037245492,0.14915906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002918382,0.000060969433,0.00024364876,0.00008226624,0.0000024684261,0.00003651054,0.00011883283,0.000014893175,0.00013366125,0.0019636955,0.9727515,0.024562303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008078739,0.000019786541,0.001253884,0.00015227059,0.0000024537485,0.000028367791,0.0003651117,0.000035274472,0.00008991284,0.00038821666,0.9976489,0.000007725396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004831432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011982948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34617838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002821637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074354326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93259716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7018820629","doi":"","title":"Episode 42: On the Waterfront (1954) (Guest: Warren Scharf)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Language change; Performance art; General partnership; Commission; Royal Commission; Deadly force","score_opus":0.017274140941355837,"score_gpt":0.2790062070084967,"score_spread":0.2617320660671409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7018820629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0487785,0.003596198,0.0007803029,0.052016616,0.009939648,0.00023235934,0.0013759794,0.000316884,0.8829635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12973288,0.001643323,0.00035644983,0.017028239,0.00076912955,0.00014168686,0.0006294798,0.00034926023,0.8493495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918824,0.0001187627,0.000014405187,0.00008828633,0.00020784016,0.00038239942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997209,0.000028405273,0.000017777362,0.00001480084,0.00006595253,0.00015223959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005213077,0.00050164264,0.00026314898,0.0004419726,0.014409453,0.0036832425,0.00080592994,0.0035753625,0.07972399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020773644,0.00040436562,0.0003200843,0.00055698,0.0015623017,0.0031163679,0.004716352,0.005658406,0.013594639],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034754645,0.000036074616,0.00057599955,0.000032373147,0.000002715468,0.0012408068,0.024401717,0.00002464255,0.00024149712,0.0074317106,0.95555204,0.010425634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025565441,0.000007796124,0.0006680692,0.000050410574,0.0000011513494,0.00014017781,0.010401645,0.0000079880165,0.00008621079,0.00020805957,0.9884212,0.0000048464926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13422067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29757175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13422067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005061276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002747438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26687884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020352974","doi":"","title":"Les libertés et les déterminations du juge dans un contexte d’utilisation d’outils d’aide à la décision","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Hydro-Québec; National Strength and Conditioning Association","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Responsible government; Common Rule","score_opus":0.01406516865863635,"score_gpt":0.2340573687920763,"score_spread":0.21999220013343995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020352974","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06766923,0.004150035,0.027940974,0.034868848,0.00040751314,0.000061061226,0.0001129232,0.000057146954,0.8647322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90735316,0.0016055218,0.0042032767,0.001890654,0.00017808295,0.000085338455,0.000044385542,0.00007304385,0.08456654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882582,0.0063209585,0.0002652908,0.0012603462,0.0020710453,0.001824175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946853,0.0028551416,0.0006043577,0.0005778448,0.0007640868,0.00051324785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008227584,0.00058718666,0.00050166034,0.0012257297,0.010132439,0.014614702,0.0015002877,0.0037376103,0.010697078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0106035145,0.00043150314,0.00050293584,0.001532703,0.040708367,0.007402292,0.0061824485,0.0067214323,0.0012993439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012410891,0.0000066632865,0.00025129013,0.000016482105,0.0000032808339,0.00006280312,0.011834703,0.00012838622,0.000051678475,0.984089,0.0011391856,0.0024041345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003335031,0.000054807464,0.0028794683,0.0003879562,0.000023624294,0.00022713846,0.035770994,0.0006983435,0.0007488003,0.60643095,0.35267246,0.00007213587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017524075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023039427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017524075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0103678005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008212159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07522398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7020496806","doi":"","title":"Le droit souffre-t-il?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Commensurability (mathematics); Confusion; Ceiling (cloud); Compensation (psychology); Consistency (knowledge bases); Comprehension; Perception","score_opus":0.0025940895676156706,"score_gpt":0.14725848235688732,"score_spread":0.14466439278927165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7020496806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0116917705,0.029398588,0.002503432,0.2840622,0.01673307,0.000032769556,0.0005086339,0.00025886577,0.6548106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.301043,0.015182973,0.0015483547,0.0838414,0.0034380478,0.00005180775,0.00035341457,0.00032360057,0.5942174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989297,0.00038190946,0.000030502082,0.00017664276,0.00024914302,0.00023210194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958855,0.00013747998,0.00005468357,0.00003272865,0.00009266041,0.00009390594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096671557,0.00043184718,0.00035474246,0.0004897175,0.0044466653,0.0044837696,0.00053269014,0.0030613279,0.07426136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003427025,0.00014261967,0.0003290639,0.0004722659,0.0037714806,0.005479753,0.0016673799,0.0035767506,0.0175371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011683044,0.000034386598,0.0012341066,0.00011716071,0.000011485193,0.0010161572,0.006517858,0.000084333944,0.0003927494,0.5229528,0.39743686,0.07008532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057108186,0.00001902644,0.0003888413,0.0001292868,0.0000021161186,0.00047271262,0.0023246948,0.00004293563,0.00013423509,0.013812593,0.98265475,0.000013105159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015184227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022201126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07426136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030947118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001271947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.248429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7021122388","doi":"","title":"Nothing to Believe In – Lawyers in Contemporary Films About Public Interest Litigation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sound Ideas (University of Puget Sound)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Public interest; Representation (politics); Government (linguistics); Public policy","score_opus":0.07950483580061393,"score_gpt":0.2786216495059049,"score_spread":0.19911681370529097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7021122388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37234148,0.009557125,0.0014819889,0.145108,0.0024536517,0.00003177239,0.000071865616,0.00006922589,0.46888497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95756114,0.0026472537,0.0001905718,0.008887444,0.0006232875,0.000015664882,0.00002484732,0.000074849304,0.029974995],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661607,0.0021572248,0.00004712558,0.000153583,0.0005348293,0.00049113453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995743,0.0029925804,0.0006097146,0.00010822424,0.00022428455,0.00032217085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017938919,0.00026281804,0.00026837407,0.0008246086,0.016263524,0.0105210915,0.0005781069,0.003888512,0.006952254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008410389,0.00040672542,0.00017993173,0.0012943612,0.014603005,0.007833317,0.0032279184,0.008564081,0.0007661639],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031557713,0.00004154917,0.0013645879,0.00006619825,0.000009178327,0.00054319017,0.88286537,0.000023665561,0.0005774757,0.07230438,0.030543262,0.011629573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007568575,0.000020383204,0.0031223071,0.00015803108,0.0000091979755,0.00043161263,0.69341546,0.000040345316,0.0003079739,0.006831016,0.29564062,0.000015486004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006340814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019655973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016263524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031890117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013440063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023257613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025031918","doi":"","title":"Teacher Portfolios in the Supervision Process: A Journey of Discovery","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital USD (University of San Diego)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Portfolio; Professional development; Process (computing); Meaning (existential); Personal development; Faculty development; Qualitative property; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.01992346000091339,"score_gpt":0.25078879916408087,"score_spread":0.23086533916316748,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025031918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59909976,0.044320192,0.04291286,0.21418226,0.0014788704,0.00088307046,0.00018611591,0.00061255845,0.09632441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93184006,0.019013513,0.029087303,0.00271296,0.00019629388,0.00025711753,0.000090598245,0.00015089322,0.016651295],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794906,0.013912712,0.00060940126,0.0008831309,0.0031608674,0.0019433391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97606045,0.011528638,0.0014979515,0.002015717,0.0030354906,0.0058618044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02075582,0.000686522,0.00086962135,0.001976643,0.018333761,0.023911284,0.0024813395,0.0037344336,0.0016918033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02657994,0.00093099265,0.0005230062,0.0017884959,0.022763282,0.01804534,0.012956561,0.007846729,0.0006686055],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000649596,0.00020388998,0.004171893,0.0002515809,0.000012876169,0.00087868876,0.85203797,0.00019933523,0.0007577014,0.021741949,0.0075543295,0.112124786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025670146,0.0002009627,0.003312511,0.001067508,0.000016850294,0.0017030024,0.76473445,0.0006181306,0.0008015734,0.018612804,0.20882417,0.00008231801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039880466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046297826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039880466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013643226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052245967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10976857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025298330","doi":"","title":"Victim Privacy and Open Justice 2.0: At the Frontiers of Change","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Criminal justice; Probable cause; Economic Justice; Common law; Legislation; Warrant","score_opus":0.05748763094834556,"score_gpt":0.3064879282042866,"score_spread":0.24900029725594106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025298330","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077322596,0.06914974,0.007545561,0.6459523,0.039126184,0.00016273606,0.0015193911,0.0009807278,0.22783114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19893415,0.13586305,0.02221383,0.3970642,0.040900964,0.00046255277,0.004259277,0.0025374591,0.19776452],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9581107,0.0069753,0.0021873906,0.0021128464,0.026737144,0.0038767064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.934495,0.022760238,0.0031503744,0.0051201307,0.030994605,0.0034796551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017195331,0.00053860876,0.00081660657,0.0047928942,0.0059523326,0.03554117,0.0042906217,0.007057985,0.008800861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057199683,0.00071479595,0.0010467147,0.00536161,0.01539502,0.019982262,0.006763502,0.010778964,0.002374094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021031521,0.000046569377,0.0018888247,0.0004533246,0.000012189685,0.000115779316,0.007289937,0.00013781546,0.00019365216,0.27984205,0.5904746,0.11952416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018465703,0.000009258272,0.0020797378,0.0005676144,0.000009142333,0.00006635967,0.0024726533,0.000068368936,0.00012989384,0.010560688,0.9840088,0.000025663743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30748343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37204385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30748343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032424856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06349467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6113874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028315306","doi":"","title":"E. Vipond & P. Cloutier de Repentigny: Trans Inclusive Access to Justice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Conversation; Human rights; Work (physics); Intersectionality","score_opus":0.020340978788378077,"score_gpt":0.333500394863134,"score_spread":0.3131594160747559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028315306","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007362919,0.023010112,0.00022250487,0.9412937,0.024312876,0.000007960177,0.000021045404,0.000010173592,0.010385312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.076912366,0.055064548,0.001384048,0.7096109,0.059626367,0.00010971554,0.000048643462,0.00017198452,0.09707156],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954407,0.0016210588,0.00022932138,0.0005918499,0.0016438192,0.00047321588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98947936,0.0070102913,0.00044650113,0.00018570402,0.0019805501,0.00089764805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004178324,0.0007190566,0.00070305326,0.000711707,0.013623123,0.013204487,0.0029959509,0.014587616,0.0036689725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018121801,0.00046902258,0.00047105647,0.0013355731,0.0082027735,0.0072246427,0.0031497753,0.019880801,0.000738934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010163798,0.000008359172,0.00013863115,0.00011129514,0.0000054017264,0.0002321854,0.004167538,0.000027089633,0.000041949883,0.03176376,0.95477104,0.008722595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063109396,0.0000076543265,0.0009481006,0.00038650216,0.000008585251,0.00021264503,0.008555216,0.000085800166,0.00016578747,0.009837686,0.9797568,0.000028873024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073851235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18975775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073851235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053837476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011213806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14684272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028854406","doi":"","title":"The Heteronomy of Flesh: A Minor Jurisprudence of the Use of the Human Dead and Tissues","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"York University Digital Library (York University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BC Cancer Agency; North Bristol NHS Trust; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Nuclear Safety and Security Commission; University of Toronto; Dalhousie University; Royal Geographical Society; York University","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Property (philosophy); Heteronomy; Jurisdiction; Materiality (auditing); Restitution; Minor (academic); Critical legal studies","score_opus":0.021992799702608107,"score_gpt":0.20235519855214776,"score_spread":0.18036239884953964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028854406","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048922308,0.034251925,0.03735771,0.17038482,0.0033074424,0.00006453374,0.00003328686,0.0000735839,0.7056043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86735535,0.010106137,0.0063704513,0.028689886,0.0020809004,0.00012460991,0.000023095536,0.00014342676,0.08510627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99399394,0.0031371652,0.00017579173,0.0010403096,0.0012790958,0.00037367357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99382883,0.004509332,0.00030356535,0.0005945519,0.0004564393,0.00030726087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076785334,0.0003969542,0.00060606183,0.0011915528,0.008032945,0.009607465,0.001578446,0.0066053574,0.002377841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008506584,0.00041164082,0.0004456409,0.000644331,0.081618264,0.009836941,0.007133438,0.010396729,0.0004203716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039190513,0.0000036913996,0.00005064421,0.0000119163815,8.0861554e-7,0.00002828156,0.0059394296,0.000026291364,0.000064993605,0.9892931,0.0017567892,0.0028201516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013538962,0.0000720163,0.00044774677,0.00057597714,0.000009889148,0.00031461372,0.011516387,0.00023843827,0.00046250573,0.6096885,0.37663367,0.000026666905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00526615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008501566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009607465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052917753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040608466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7028939160","doi":"","title":"How far are we willing to go? : transition, resistance, and adaptation in Ontario’s criminal courts during the COVID-19 pandemic","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Criminal justice; Poison control; Law enforcement","score_opus":0.0238937180768837,"score_gpt":0.21338615349170945,"score_spread":0.18949243541482574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7028939160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94828576,0.0011640992,0.00021221527,0.027762296,0.000094570445,0.00007709573,0.000399759,0.000008137479,0.021995995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929842,0.00073271105,0.0001118615,0.0017838614,0.0000111279,0.00002649997,0.00009523804,0.000008734381,0.0042457976],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99501556,0.0010128097,0.00017952977,0.00038966903,0.001325798,0.0020766014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99083775,0.0014032896,0.0018473481,0.00032741122,0.0027421678,0.0028419693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003019284,0.00017370307,0.00042060652,0.00085268123,0.016272819,0.0071323784,0.0017932617,0.0018597108,0.004495927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012080349,0.00037001623,0.0002974076,0.0023661137,0.009579067,0.0029151305,0.0037121894,0.002748619,0.00029985438],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012604517,0.00008359545,0.2673564,0.00022264733,0.00005071534,0.0011706721,0.6862127,0.00019349728,0.0007465077,0.009017003,0.013425416,0.021394772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008093506,0.000031193234,0.28791723,0.00029624937,0.000022169808,0.0001028347,0.6732287,0.00013517443,0.00013089628,0.000601689,0.03746173,0.00006401865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9869833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10113885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10113885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10360098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73381716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030212717","doi":"","title":"01.02.2024, Motion M M-75 debated in the House of Commons","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Motion (physics); House of Commons; Commons; Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Object (grammar)","score_opus":0.027904040228847776,"score_gpt":0.26154957101957993,"score_spread":0.23364553079073216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030212717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006706694,0.0024599,0.0008495101,0.026632654,0.019229205,0.00079604634,0.0046196887,0.00075186515,0.9379545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007164816,0.00017638542,0.000109382105,0.0033419575,0.00036909318,0.00009421444,0.00029134756,0.000102670645,0.98835015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893874,0.000069538175,0.000025952571,0.00008763012,0.00038780287,0.00049022696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933064,0.00006185887,0.00003384906,0.00003149485,0.00029356976,0.00024863097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013253764,0.00064443296,0.00041347984,0.0012053967,0.006595693,0.0047855875,0.0009963941,0.009001671,0.20057032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003931512,0.00065769034,0.00077212637,0.0006799463,0.0011447202,0.0012110561,0.0021911457,0.0074535776,0.09412383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015532422,0.00004972088,0.0007927497,0.00006509449,0.0000052063097,0.00022927446,0.00036273152,0.00003589337,0.0007141565,0.008591457,0.9771656,0.011832795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002354905,0.00005555255,0.0060290913,0.000107518514,0.000005269181,0.000050879193,0.0004895342,0.000050335275,0.00045506062,0.00071282167,0.9920036,0.000016734632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14579488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49061352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20057032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006364677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039429115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67097455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7032913488","doi":"","title":"Osgoode Hall Law School Appoints Two Journalists in Residence","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Economic Justice; Civil liberties; Face (sociological concept); Intersection (aeronautics); Legal research; Newspaper","score_opus":0.042092780444658556,"score_gpt":0.3731895631478698,"score_spread":0.3310967827032112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7032913488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040615555,0.014747272,0.0022411821,0.21232653,0.07701395,0.0009830333,0.001971084,0.0030603134,0.6470411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025551017,0.0015824238,0.0012177778,0.007635197,0.003580441,0.000103602804,0.00031513665,0.00027200903,0.9597425],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976548,0.0002013481,0.00011173606,0.0004725469,0.00077142083,0.00078809174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98745316,0.0011212226,0.000489746,0.00058206276,0.0031451841,0.0072087036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029828616,0.000528624,0.0004681145,0.0030094434,0.0135458615,0.010484772,0.0009785728,0.0043880222,0.15643574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055437465,0.0007910678,0.00041448322,0.0011853448,0.002774573,0.003917041,0.0029881997,0.0042298497,0.027296627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008278604,0.00015296896,0.0021181102,0.000083606035,0.0000057792727,0.0007709957,0.0008176675,0.000015186243,0.0017248006,0.008116485,0.9389016,0.047210064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001104089,0.00003054969,0.0014453557,0.000030579537,0.0000021623373,0.00012005725,0.0006919648,0.000020665238,0.0003279828,0.0001781483,0.9971301,0.000011604116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02442004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09193155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15643574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004704984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01075527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52332973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7037890337","doi":"","title":"First Solar, Inc. Announces Fourth Quarter &amp;amp; Full Year 2015 Financial Results - Earnings News (EARNINGS) News","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Quarter (Canadian coin); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.01851907051117515,"score_gpt":0.28190963490014836,"score_spread":0.26339056438897324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7037890337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010778891,0.0004356694,0.00018842884,0.010453603,0.004371323,0.000043181197,0.00420366,0.00079242093,0.9784338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027074623,0.00019983793,0.00007006006,0.0009972481,0.00052293437,0.000011033693,0.0011119856,0.00015173753,0.99422765],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990085,0.000040951738,0.00002782232,0.000059017817,0.0007088226,0.00015487144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717003,0.0002719908,0.00012953507,0.00015456816,0.0016175627,0.0006563019],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090917165,0.00038145424,0.000312485,0.0011760971,0.002247735,0.0064446423,0.00052158086,0.0019055089,0.45843497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043358766,0.00027144147,0.0004021665,0.001029931,0.00041468674,0.0017452786,0.0013324281,0.0024055967,0.2907524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001323937,0.0000132975,0.00013917194,0.000010674321,5.8166347e-7,0.000021107864,0.00001321103,0.000009365486,0.00004972134,0.0014434536,0.9917965,0.006489693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000083971445,0.000012216618,0.001296585,0.000027390703,0.0000017734852,0.000019195024,0.000068991685,0.000062280305,0.00020899434,0.00053890015,0.9977494,0.0000058496526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01684571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045788895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45843497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016366262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023900396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7724768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039433866","doi":"","title":"Masthead, Table of Contents &amp; Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Table of contents; Scholarship; Table (database); Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.02132197083177168,"score_gpt":0.2834644373556034,"score_spread":0.2621424665238317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039433866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022648567,0.0014335361,0.00093327084,0.0048241457,0.008427252,0.00025721552,0.014071731,0.0018630426,0.9679633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013329802,0.0011526815,0.000545256,0.0015847997,0.0014580052,0.00012285933,0.0035740624,0.00088827044,0.9893412],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995523,0.000046843063,0.000028215127,0.00007690922,0.00023826763,0.000057376572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985897,0.0002819867,0.00006635895,0.000120796845,0.0006985614,0.00024266222],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006757891,0.0008080297,0.0006410354,0.0019263367,0.002204857,0.0057006427,0.0014395562,0.0017782756,0.83974254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032231123,0.0006741857,0.00048837217,0.0022668561,0.0006010732,0.0038142712,0.0019325946,0.002222951,0.7145815],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007544037,0.000009578758,0.00003370035,0.000061068225,3.8245742e-7,0.000009879193,0.00001659553,0.000014920252,0.000060374092,0.0015862334,0.9827283,0.015471407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002246,0.000004855299,0.00019284333,0.00006723007,5.059704e-7,0.000012706,0.000039575167,0.000015418385,0.000044340686,0.0007516582,0.99886525,0.0000034338523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008318866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012199286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16025746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019407183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026156313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22858775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042501134","doi":"","title":"Personal Reflections on Being a Postcolonial Feminist Animal Law Professor","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Theme (computing); Animal rights; Field (mathematics); Human animal; Animal ethics; Feminism","score_opus":0.023062006149553827,"score_gpt":0.32324864686590377,"score_spread":0.30018664071634993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042501134","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17547502,0.010842215,0.0045034443,0.67858696,0.0056297835,0.00006351558,0.00007573794,0.00008701037,0.12473633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75832427,0.0059546386,0.0013794339,0.12985374,0.0011123016,0.00011749006,0.000031343403,0.00015646404,0.10307037],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821911,0.01285947,0.00017442681,0.00090938224,0.001874571,0.0019910983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907951,0.0052098865,0.00057489745,0.00023084746,0.00094376784,0.0022456076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0112453615,0.000576706,0.00064587477,0.0011065017,0.028265418,0.009624335,0.0023259537,0.006753653,0.0070415027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014438119,0.00054626213,0.00037088446,0.0012981268,0.03333492,0.009371376,0.007908806,0.017044006,0.001365344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023323271,0.00008876309,0.001261392,0.000057315003,0.0000048188713,0.0017624027,0.8646068,0.00008258037,0.00052590494,0.06601611,0.056963943,0.0086067505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030705219,0.000038175982,0.00039413146,0.00015300758,0.000001927941,0.00087981665,0.66491973,0.00007177602,0.00020546344,0.004706654,0.328606,0.000020253041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010192771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018887961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028265418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006575977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046049906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059471846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7042532640","doi":"","title":"Pour une théorie génétique du droit. Au-delà des approches herméneutique et positiviste","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); French; Democratic legitimacy; Limiting","score_opus":0.012437604713195032,"score_gpt":0.21617087437495033,"score_spread":0.2037332696617553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7042532640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026314346,0.034003165,0.29710728,0.1277451,0.0020203837,0.00023173633,0.0010333094,0.00036832364,0.5111764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69872147,0.01977396,0.083999276,0.016899103,0.00080902694,0.00060083315,0.0006502283,0.00042972795,0.17811634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956689,0.0022753123,0.00014009078,0.0008006399,0.0008482026,0.0002669482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939365,0.0035345112,0.00041646897,0.00081244926,0.0010074143,0.00029271696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005469845,0.0009496246,0.0007870402,0.0032043653,0.0038881926,0.006610992,0.0017541343,0.0043400326,0.022085363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0080119865,0.0006067421,0.0015968104,0.0030173124,0.018473709,0.0074017528,0.0031122868,0.005649313,0.0037809054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001174527,0.000013566068,0.0011954296,0.00012756843,0.000023225692,0.00009002444,0.0031896248,0.0007206754,0.0002376218,0.97859955,0.0035106658,0.012280328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013984094,0.00003172318,0.0037344177,0.00054513745,0.000041600586,0.00026111267,0.0041130185,0.0021132468,0.00044070985,0.7910836,0.19756803,0.000053537282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.095649794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.102182224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.095649794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0155254025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008648559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19018608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043355676","doi":"","title":"Swearing Justice in Henry Goodcole and <i>The Witch of Edmonton</i>","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Witch; Performative utterance; Economic Justice; Power (physics); Action (physics)","score_opus":0.012291832865437625,"score_gpt":0.23798000422613683,"score_spread":0.2256881713606992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043355676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21094903,0.023114588,0.0010706712,0.27005896,0.0028954132,0.000028175316,0.000029369729,0.00006655688,0.4917872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8082072,0.0030515979,0.00036956198,0.025297284,0.0005620286,0.000021709116,0.000008129468,0.000057745794,0.1624248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889153,0.00053262035,0.000009252831,0.00007408194,0.00018253489,0.0003099946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993267,0.00036018854,0.00004520757,0.000022775908,0.00006324566,0.00018194514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016553727,0.00025783625,0.00022276209,0.00060180895,0.01969469,0.0055175964,0.00066712085,0.0028091792,0.0035858182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002170908,0.00025841754,0.00010243143,0.00041413784,0.023382511,0.0027941135,0.0035853125,0.0049280184,0.00027575693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024021596,0.000022095526,0.00038401302,0.000043363583,0.000004211977,0.00065358146,0.35425472,0.000069484464,0.00035236834,0.51363015,0.11810208,0.012459952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008404861,0.000018300709,0.0015827556,0.00024223897,0.0000051482157,0.00031437,0.2078278,0.000051549003,0.00036645078,0.031682365,0.75786954,0.000031143678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16191079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3646539,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16191079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009812754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056030503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32193667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043859914","doi":"","title":"Tragic and comic myths in Canadian ‘tar sands’ jurisprudence","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mythology; Trickster; Comics; Jurisprudence; Indigenous; Narrative; Context (archaeology); Tragedy (event)","score_opus":0.03120883982565261,"score_gpt":0.3307403208185751,"score_spread":0.2995314809929225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043859914","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17553791,0.014497855,0.0033070734,0.19812497,0.0013548115,0.00007027037,0.00010254169,0.00012976745,0.60687476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96908927,0.001394666,0.000546349,0.00708631,0.00013925925,0.000019974228,0.000022030401,0.00005285015,0.021649394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99372345,0.0016015603,0.000099179,0.00068868394,0.0019277896,0.0019592629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947438,0.0028760647,0.00027218636,0.00021837128,0.0011116483,0.0007780445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050484072,0.0006030845,0.00044281708,0.0033436012,0.0677775,0.019613666,0.0033896994,0.008557777,0.0061325766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010100003,0.00048833917,0.00031957476,0.004249271,0.08765943,0.005511022,0.0063014165,0.009476739,0.0003301165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016471371,0.000012737839,0.00043952043,0.000034671037,0.0000049202927,0.0004083303,0.27819285,0.00016499097,0.00014978465,0.6961796,0.01838524,0.0060109254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001953004,0.0000179884,0.0030238796,0.00028971757,0.000014714545,0.0003193456,0.24658169,0.00073474913,0.00032224722,0.087978795,0.660587,0.00011036268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.953853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96502954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14107889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14107889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07054365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067264854","doi":"","title":"Le droit, les arts et la culture, tous réunis sous un même toit à Osgoode Hall Law School à l’Université York","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The arts; Simulacrum; Economic Justice; ESPACE","score_opus":0.02168112752599363,"score_gpt":0.254431344005777,"score_spread":0.23275021647978336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067264854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056788545,0.0040208953,0.0051824367,0.03930618,0.0015984426,0.00014786581,0.00039150193,0.00033460185,0.8922296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19648331,0.0021273056,0.00242811,0.0025734154,0.00017951144,0.00012174441,0.00026359234,0.00034940467,0.7954736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969675,0.00060352,0.0000766854,0.0005271704,0.0012298118,0.00059531495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972838,0.00034523808,0.00017678885,0.0003172926,0.00074813823,0.0011286713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017032591,0.0006461562,0.0004305007,0.0009066711,0.015854064,0.013299826,0.0011271009,0.0025653376,0.11577634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034367628,0.0005754555,0.00030385132,0.0012118863,0.012067187,0.005336423,0.0082407035,0.0049938424,0.016212946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016055976,0.0001978842,0.01083651,0.00042980767,0.00003140894,0.00070620194,0.103797734,0.00031823353,0.006489622,0.2916006,0.34474996,0.24068142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007587205,0.000046863057,0.0076655685,0.00021253541,0.0000059576164,0.00007007725,0.029467253,0.00006829735,0.0007103531,0.0038106206,0.9579084,0.000026550375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27351913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53227913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72648084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017680237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01961518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5438541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7069933245","doi":"","title":"McGill, Brian","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Natural (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.02409036943759333,"score_gpt":0.2908697460319315,"score_spread":0.26677937659433815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7069933245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035509712,0.0027405974,0.00073574315,0.0037374473,0.0016694047,0.00006399027,0.0012260522,0.0005290734,0.9889425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00086243055,0.00064816757,0.00019566274,0.0005746182,0.000070868606,0.00002104574,0.000111578025,0.0001329424,0.9973826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946624,0.00006059802,0.000015306536,0.00014198695,0.00023394868,0.00008189105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986816,0.00017990929,0.00004134095,0.0001851653,0.00066370156,0.00024827503],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006124603,0.0013421605,0.0005969102,0.001895542,0.0039367103,0.0035447176,0.0013110758,0.0016620972,0.57764053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002482429,0.0008578426,0.00041811017,0.00209346,0.00076695246,0.0018500094,0.0018100481,0.0023104576,0.31124672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001557105,0.000009697095,0.000080455364,0.000037546186,0.0000016032199,0.000054981705,0.000098257144,0.000057817564,0.00018804989,0.00519874,0.9222663,0.07199092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034625045,0.0000045319725,0.00028152086,0.000039518185,0.0000018960696,0.000027191678,0.00011243734,0.000030417184,0.00006164631,0.00071592623,0.99871767,0.000003787157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10442872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37423488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42235947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023174523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00352002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6024445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7072369840","doi":"","title":"Wie und warum zitieren Gerichte? Intertextuelle Bezugnahmen in den Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts und des Supreme Court of Canada","year":2024,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.019592773671757633,"score_gpt":0.28144833734971025,"score_spread":0.2618555636779526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7072369840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16984947,0.00988366,0.0052422713,0.22953525,0.0010446829,0.00014468536,0.0003285863,0.00006265823,0.58390874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96459377,0.0009689583,0.00050803303,0.006532346,0.00006499461,0.000030822765,0.000033870685,0.000043044896,0.027224109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97723764,0.0061325342,0.00041308123,0.001871005,0.004071289,0.010274373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891727,0.00534963,0.00052419177,0.0005361944,0.0025010724,0.0019162474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0129968645,0.00047246763,0.0006963481,0.0020057305,0.035090502,0.03201522,0.0028873314,0.010081794,0.009878586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028510282,0.00077719486,0.0004942512,0.0036399101,0.054854285,0.009718439,0.009646732,0.014475702,0.00059276953],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022948527,0.000014201339,0.0010207242,0.00002308037,0.000014424041,0.0001461887,0.045041405,0.00025226426,0.00010798077,0.9364809,0.011128946,0.0057470794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006360499,0.00002080939,0.008700412,0.0004312009,0.0000949147,0.00013692335,0.18200207,0.0011267795,0.0008494143,0.42307967,0.38331708,0.00017707897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9475702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96128166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12498586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12498586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15872008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90684015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W70753498","doi":"10.3138/cjh.47.2.231","title":"God's Hat and the Highwayman's Shoes: A Gestural and Sartorial History of Seventeenth-and Eighteenth-Century English Trial and Execution","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of History","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Performative utterance; Scholarship; Situated; Context (archaeology); Gesture; Agency (philosophy); Sociology; Carnivalesque; Aesthetics; History; Law; Art; Social science; Political science; Philosophy; Archaeology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.016489558618767948,"score_gpt":0.2360443513073821,"score_spread":0.21955479268861416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W70753498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53195876,0.006152213,0.0021177195,0.0045497236,0.00023424772,0.000024931258,0.000080474485,0.00003283656,0.4548491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97249967,0.0009941675,0.00018727068,0.00014898587,0.00004294318,0.0000072169296,0.000014007966,0.000023045352,0.026082745],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990202,0.00048621462,0.000040990395,0.00008378947,0.0001895758,0.00017921173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884725,0.00066753686,0.00013745586,0.00007655957,0.00017201477,0.00009920782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012633915,0.00019803706,0.00019395705,0.0011066503,0.006075374,0.0037945297,0.0004110789,0.0009410286,0.0054412126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028759048,0.00024764455,0.00008545701,0.000767118,0.018020196,0.0029203924,0.0022711852,0.0018542134,0.0004004694],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056075067,0.000018783603,0.0019528904,0.00008338946,0.0000048001093,0.0009802707,0.6210149,0.000077052944,0.00042926095,0.35745427,0.0031245349,0.0148038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002698822,0.00010275003,0.015185588,0.0006866616,0.000016250564,0.0010075927,0.2696306,0.0002683509,0.0012414409,0.025566742,0.6862185,0.000048567068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026274709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06561318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026274709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004389629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018636049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05224353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7092189558","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5587634","title":"No Law is an Island: A Dialogical Rejoinder to Authoritarian Legalism","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legalism (Western philosophy); Authoritarianism; Dialogical self; Personalism","score_opus":0.02108979133245627,"score_gpt":0.3090019275168111,"score_spread":0.28791213618435485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7092189558","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012812727,0.001531186,0.009316595,0.8342046,0.005147505,0.00004411214,0.000050036684,0.00008612695,0.13680708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74572855,0.0009542883,0.005830737,0.20598689,0.00637547,0.00027560565,0.00004409249,0.0004598854,0.034344506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97975314,0.012208005,0.0006989129,0.0027231134,0.0027547788,0.0018621075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96374446,0.027825844,0.0009357375,0.0032049073,0.0023552903,0.0019337367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025439763,0.0008075717,0.0018139378,0.0018441043,0.027239459,0.020617772,0.0061295894,0.047899332,0.007670272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040672902,0.00088902056,0.0012111259,0.0015791925,0.09319142,0.027163371,0.021052258,0.072792254,0.0012414326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010728189,0.000007999146,0.000036610978,0.00001788162,0.000005428472,0.00011349413,0.020177811,0.0000512524,0.000039490882,0.95379716,0.023777971,0.0019642098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034245146,0.000010250711,0.000075152275,0.00013820129,0.000010849297,0.00010580325,0.018483229,0.00040018288,0.00013576873,0.83807826,0.14249584,0.000032228374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009311883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010035059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047899332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0089037055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0126085365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13453996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093614555","doi":"","title":"Book Review of Michael J Trebilcock, <em>Public Inquiries: A Scholar’s Engagements with the Policy-Making Process</em> (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2022), 136pp.","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Triacetin; Emperipolesis; Demotion","score_opus":0.0189149854294884,"score_gpt":0.29135636684366983,"score_spread":0.27244138141418145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093614555","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022718978,0.59383404,0.0006299802,0.23853998,0.042904522,0.00006916195,0.001042814,0.00015734349,0.12259492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036077767,0.35328436,0.00074836187,0.12664469,0.025478244,0.00014464484,0.00084688736,0.00024268078,0.48900238],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998938,0.00016623919,0.000057402973,0.00010586061,0.0006734974,0.000058918733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99451786,0.0027093661,0.0002642655,0.00011420942,0.0020539647,0.00034035396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017761489,0.0007602427,0.0010348428,0.0035884737,0.0023697105,0.003331233,0.0019866943,0.003777173,0.042486098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072649093,0.00058334717,0.00047352715,0.005090454,0.0019225642,0.004189447,0.0010881211,0.004251681,0.031145535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.741498e-7,0.0000016864641,0.000009073847,0.000055710883,5.6213776e-7,0.000007423394,0.000024408526,0.000012893683,0.0000065990534,0.00073407794,0.9937889,0.0053576278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001289009,0.0000012787692,0.00012448951,0.00021698273,0.0000014133494,0.000024164276,0.00004281462,0.000012393092,0.000009631733,0.00039884273,0.99916315,0.000003611514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070535146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18932377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9294649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070893997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009265855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1421302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093671145","doi":"","title":"Présentation","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"OpenEdition (OpenEdition)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Western europe; Telmatology; Pilotage","score_opus":0.021717976728420747,"score_gpt":0.28772383468265034,"score_spread":0.2660058579542296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093671145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00478232,0.0051260414,0.0046325005,0.09610292,0.07362654,0.0004517083,0.0052338727,0.001056398,0.80898774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025437135,0.0039546406,0.0016321787,0.020824987,0.009761263,0.00033737734,0.003192058,0.00062477106,0.9342357],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972128,0.00052410556,0.00014508999,0.00050207385,0.0011802614,0.0004356888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951741,0.00069995894,0.00018520872,0.00047818257,0.002344836,0.0011177369],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025714415,0.0006768374,0.00053458865,0.0012713204,0.0036389178,0.008032397,0.001808196,0.0036628505,0.38386157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013847992,0.00029565225,0.00066270906,0.0010707051,0.0013940552,0.00402632,0.0046028714,0.004053368,0.1644607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007249134,0.00003616427,0.00039170866,0.00014471654,0.0000059068925,0.0002966396,0.0006327566,0.00006292045,0.00027222946,0.021935252,0.9289938,0.047155328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060031025,0.000009671277,0.00022793403,0.00010294888,0.0000021057024,0.0001610403,0.00039624734,0.000026910096,0.00013609485,0.0024413953,0.9964837,0.0000058895807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004712828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005124159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61613846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065616164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8788467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093951889","doi":"","title":"9781552389553.pdf","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OAPEN (The OAPEN Foundation)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada; Government of Alberta; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Council for the Arts; Bishop's University; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Commission; Scholarship; Post truth; Diversity (politics)","score_opus":0.01713479104127985,"score_gpt":0.29511767362519514,"score_spread":0.2779828825839153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093951889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000365864,0.0015771107,0.0006119944,0.0013367379,0.0011121882,0.000034841487,0.00146454,0.0005763379,0.99292046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022680827,0.0019588615,0.00053703005,0.0007281624,0.00023685557,0.000051605475,0.0010542014,0.0005253798,0.9926398],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993352,0.00011136051,0.000044152373,0.00012975704,0.0002917477,0.000087691245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895465,0.00033192238,0.000068978785,0.00015811098,0.0002621929,0.00022406726],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076958333,0.0006760713,0.0005170578,0.0015754551,0.0016432585,0.011862652,0.0011187162,0.0024594094,0.8910497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002965893,0.0004232111,0.00050723366,0.0029557366,0.0009473933,0.006587965,0.004538253,0.0020446018,0.8383114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032514366,0.00002820934,0.000258909,0.00029434715,0.0000043326736,0.000112757116,0.0003540011,0.00006191634,0.00032822127,0.01793617,0.68305993,0.29752868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026348507,0.00000571188,0.00020865204,0.00013970399,9.629105e-7,0.00007096436,0.00015821736,0.000017503173,0.000051101473,0.0007390517,0.9986015,0.000003996893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018276828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020150584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10895032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000992589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010148281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15540439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096693544","doi":"","title":"Copyright © Canadian Academy of Oriental and Occidental Culture A Comparative Study of Revenge and Law in the Chinese and Western Cultures","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Government (linguistics); Western culture","score_opus":0.037488988256617124,"score_gpt":0.3719800646848723,"score_spread":0.3344910764282552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096693544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3431962,0.01193165,0.0001134622,0.008953939,0.0004788554,0.000046261768,0.001563028,0.000026415704,0.63369024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8734624,0.010826438,0.00031786578,0.0012878458,0.00008600271,0.000042922256,0.0005351487,0.000020333633,0.11342108],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967194,0.000058393416,0.000021962283,0.00003977322,0.00008851281,0.00011946626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991346,0.00019963534,0.000070023816,0.00006384771,0.00030342155,0.00022858486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005892501,0.00025465534,0.00031226195,0.00116987,0.0073058098,0.0047250357,0.00039218177,0.00041416803,0.056543376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013476985,0.00015824311,0.000118213145,0.0048117912,0.003895418,0.0012880174,0.0011736305,0.0005033836,0.0019071427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018381397,0.00015803995,0.19860637,0.001044534,0.00007857522,0.0014045197,0.21612127,0.00023868193,0.001968026,0.14454287,0.2006788,0.23497449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009534547,0.000020501539,0.37756777,0.00039876776,0.000025648536,0.00022655661,0.14330363,0.00006422799,0.00017036968,0.001903262,0.47628573,0.000024010435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86041117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92708015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86041117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010453937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021421278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28082174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7101025246","doi":"","title":"International Equity Flows and Returns: A Quantitative Equilibrium Approach,” 2005. Working Paper","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); General equilibrium theory; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); International investment","score_opus":0.04909044263519271,"score_gpt":0.3424753060137219,"score_spread":0.2933848633785292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7101025246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08861571,0.033938378,0.39058498,0.06631063,0.0016860102,0.00027128283,0.0039090444,0.00048301017,0.414201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88907176,0.0162718,0.030246677,0.0011974,0.0010415023,0.0003354147,0.0011433333,0.0002530216,0.060439143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989862,0.00049362483,0.000039081773,0.0001370842,0.00020149784,0.00014253358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849355,0.0008136326,0.00025914336,0.00009431806,0.0002638637,0.00007545618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032829598,0.00085471565,0.0006506816,0.0016772306,0.0009039509,0.0053090085,0.0011550334,0.0025542425,0.015166482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009275578,0.0008481086,0.0010599308,0.0017687423,0.002162785,0.008976015,0.0015819465,0.0025881936,0.0014599722],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011761151,0.000013926013,0.0006256943,0.000043936707,0.000034627337,0.000031088624,0.00008910706,0.011287244,0.000043152486,0.9705886,0.00988924,0.007341529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018232948,0.000015885416,0.001957965,0.000109746186,0.00003394439,0.000038468184,0.000175249,0.034690164,0.00019278588,0.93645674,0.026292225,0.000018645813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008675575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071539604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015166482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004965156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026029614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050736964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102648418","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0039","title":"Denise Réaume and the Women’s Court of Canada: Feminist judgment projects and rewriting <i>Pierson v Post</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Scholarship; Supreme court; Rewriting; Legal history; Conciliation; Perspective (graphical); Common law; Legal formalism","score_opus":0.0049925668961238135,"score_gpt":0.2008647706149532,"score_spread":0.19587220371882938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102648418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0998428,0.017554259,0.0032106156,0.17849922,0.002148977,0.00007801557,0.00018026555,0.00008099851,0.6984048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88196194,0.00432577,0.001154637,0.018184025,0.00041336106,0.00006154796,0.00005401967,0.00013826464,0.09370639],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992912,0.0018570648,0.00010794732,0.0007391022,0.002385485,0.0019983833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953257,0.002525999,0.00021990885,0.00022692,0.0011459552,0.00055562885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046190443,0.00052311557,0.00042783207,0.0015093955,0.040254958,0.018019829,0.002547096,0.0065681473,0.0036449875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009881544,0.00053605053,0.00033129443,0.0023045342,0.058637712,0.0048608165,0.00492022,0.011662637,0.00028719177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001207817,0.00001071251,0.00046873925,0.00003793599,0.0000058318437,0.0005248845,0.18526363,0.00019863698,0.00021680277,0.7555664,0.04799217,0.009702236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012476122,0.000014867324,0.002171024,0.00034539818,0.000019171885,0.00023824429,0.14571947,0.0003724872,0.0008178359,0.05417501,0.7960165,0.00009749239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9412241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96908903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14074495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14074495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09378149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99661404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7102830595","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2025-0037","title":"‘More legal theory than I thought’: Robert Sharpe and legal scholarship","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal realism; Legal formalism; Normative; Legal research; Empirical legal studies; Scholarship; Habeas corpus; Legal profession; Legal opinion","score_opus":0.008113778256324878,"score_gpt":0.25199561264418585,"score_spread":0.24388183438786099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7102830595","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046073403,0.16727139,0.006611619,0.6962396,0.0034657528,0.000017729477,0.00004295842,0.000046615718,0.1216969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6402893,0.11758786,0.010345986,0.1435166,0.018325498,0.0001649287,0.000084530424,0.00019796503,0.0694874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99327624,0.0045453813,0.00020398825,0.00056957616,0.0010040565,0.0004007169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890308,0.007958476,0.0005338535,0.00065654796,0.0012393523,0.00058100454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076286285,0.000595652,0.000802141,0.0031368644,0.0067102136,0.010774078,0.0016296486,0.0077703204,0.0043865307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016133795,0.00045842148,0.0005233555,0.003280637,0.05439246,0.019435026,0.0029983972,0.012166124,0.0008996281],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029220212,0.0000078522935,0.000037740392,0.000027933447,0.0000017803386,0.000028027696,0.002483582,0.00006461065,0.000017266111,0.97197837,0.022226833,0.003123044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011577148,0.000010803001,0.00014919585,0.00031168538,0.0000032565185,0.00006396042,0.0029614288,0.00016395087,0.00005429307,0.7344368,0.2618168,0.00001621138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015511844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013843506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015511844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0099194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006714802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07197064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7103664820","doi":"","title":"Jeremy Packer, Paula Nuñez de Villavicencio, Alexander Monea, Kathleen Oswald, Kate Maddalena, and Joshua Reeves, The Prison House of the Circuit: Politics of Control from Analog to Digital","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Politics; Control (management); Jeremy bentham; Crime control","score_opus":0.12406993636855324,"score_gpt":0.4858390132470879,"score_spread":0.36176907687853466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7103664820","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031236538,0.119211264,0.0019070081,0.77246106,0.012176501,0.00004776362,0.00021893876,0.00006962781,0.090784214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.106754616,0.18352091,0.0039104843,0.2700905,0.009809454,0.0002490803,0.00034439395,0.00039752695,0.42492303],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844813,0.00041763767,0.000054994067,0.00023076145,0.0006564967,0.00019187125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949787,0.0022651115,0.0003141362,0.00020050892,0.0016252076,0.0006163218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002944415,0.00076701347,0.00048307577,0.0015563774,0.008099463,0.007882104,0.0017229443,0.005882008,0.018912435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012866103,0.0006417995,0.0003127136,0.0014292152,0.00459483,0.0120514175,0.0028881072,0.010940954,0.003978663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026184878,0.000035551744,0.0007378604,0.00010208292,0.000010704153,0.000057159334,0.0023925619,0.000059553073,0.00006400089,0.078401625,0.8897585,0.028354112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030577536,0.000018296281,0.0034615237,0.00051538955,0.000019621164,0.00010748563,0.0072379205,0.00009344937,0.00029871333,0.03337564,0.95480907,0.000032322136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070225894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17828068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070225894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032999672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058166115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13963425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104458988","doi":"10.71781/23252","title":"How far are we willing to go? : transition, resistance, and adaptation in Ontario’s criminal courts during the COVID-19 pandemic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Criminal justice; Poison control; Law enforcement","score_opus":0.022949544386407027,"score_gpt":0.21904191762047834,"score_spread":0.1960923732340713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104458988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94828576,0.0011640992,0.00021221527,0.027762296,0.000094570445,0.00007709573,0.000399759,0.000008137479,0.021995995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929842,0.00073271105,0.0001118615,0.0017838614,0.0000111279,0.00002649997,0.00009523804,0.000008734381,0.0042457976],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99501556,0.0010128097,0.00017952977,0.00038966903,0.001325798,0.0020766014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99083775,0.0014032896,0.0018473481,0.00032741122,0.0027421678,0.0028419693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003019284,0.00017370307,0.00042060652,0.00085268123,0.016272819,0.0071323784,0.0017932617,0.0018597108,0.004495927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012080349,0.00037001623,0.0002974076,0.0023661137,0.009579067,0.0029151305,0.0037121894,0.002748619,0.00029985438],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012604517,0.00008359545,0.2673564,0.00022264733,0.00005071534,0.0011706721,0.6862127,0.00019349728,0.0007465077,0.009017003,0.013425416,0.021394772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008093506,0.000031193234,0.28791723,0.00029624937,0.000022169808,0.0001028347,0.6732287,0.00013517443,0.00013089628,0.000601689,0.03746173,0.00006401865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9869833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9958584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10113885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10113885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10360098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73381716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106478226","doi":"","title":"Interview Camille Bordère [au sujet de sa thèse : \"La justice algorithmique. Analyse comparee (France/Quebec) d’un phenomene doctrinal\", thèse menée sous la direction de la professeure Marie-Claire Ponthoreau et soutenue le 28 novembre 2023]","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Narrative; Subject (documents); Object (grammar)","score_opus":0.01319554777407303,"score_gpt":0.27765826473848554,"score_spread":0.2644627169644125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106478226","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16338229,0.021434823,0.0067885066,0.6259389,0.008240414,0.0005340732,0.002117779,0.00014070654,0.17142253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7132734,0.0052789906,0.0017206747,0.07265088,0.0007875941,0.000589498,0.00033816337,0.00027484598,0.20508592],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977697,0.0012961503,0.000057168923,0.00022611006,0.00029433667,0.00035648586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940738,0.0035218592,0.00021832724,0.00010564555,0.0015218785,0.0005585058],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004024156,0.0005406247,0.00048695834,0.0016101903,0.02405001,0.005870582,0.0014150997,0.0067321244,0.010465697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020453406,0.00043058684,0.00043374623,0.0020098505,0.007503486,0.004670475,0.0023691074,0.008348326,0.0008542357],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009875688,0.00003294561,0.002541444,0.0001793007,0.000014553325,0.0011561589,0.64290357,0.00017107734,0.0007885545,0.0736486,0.26623365,0.012231348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014455764,0.000020733307,0.00894213,0.0003780262,0.000008508989,0.00023360591,0.35321683,0.00012671122,0.0003379272,0.0029766352,0.6336883,0.000056222507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8253639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.853137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026197689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017945189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35132915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106557468","doi":"10.1007/978-981-96-9748-9_13","title":"Conclusion: Cultivating Conflict Transformation in Legal Practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Negotiation; Conflict transformation; Economic Justice; Dispute resolution; Legal profession; Legal practice; Conflict resolution; Online dispute resolution; Practice of law","score_opus":0.024674030417652724,"score_gpt":0.33013692449560383,"score_spread":0.30546289407795113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106557468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057267104,0.00153201,0.009282182,0.058254894,0.0008162095,0.00007808152,0.00006517482,0.000081898834,0.9241628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26212734,0.001938478,0.0128450645,0.024708807,0.00047048018,0.00033119787,0.00013468292,0.00018775619,0.69725615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992472,0.00038995806,0.000016369575,0.00008149956,0.00019209809,0.00007296578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991381,0.00051656424,0.00003426747,0.000062232364,0.00015173641,0.000097067226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013640235,0.0003299117,0.00018755834,0.0005507229,0.0024449248,0.00513685,0.0011472338,0.0027307123,0.02041171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019505556,0.00012027563,0.00021970227,0.0007905113,0.0062461793,0.0060029468,0.0023966874,0.003514154,0.004128532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004268237,0.000038462633,0.000099724144,0.00005102157,0.0000012485411,0.000034319753,0.0060573034,0.00010546217,0.00012887454,0.922479,0.055280045,0.015720256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012987286,0.000015851407,0.00051928434,0.00024593403,0.0000057887087,0.000112651156,0.010680667,0.00059624517,0.0007794129,0.48033518,0.5066862,0.00000980745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00387457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009618238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02041171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029789757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038613437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068283916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111590980","doi":"","title":"Raccontare la formazione del giurista statunitense con la serialita. Il caso Better Call Saul","year":2023,"lang":"it","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Realm; Legal education; Order (exchange); Legal research; Legal practice; Dimension (graph theory); Storytelling; Character (mathematics); Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.06241049236831291,"score_gpt":0.3175621761379079,"score_spread":0.25515168376959496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111590980","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044256844,0.0038899996,0.00177005,0.014280864,0.00047866732,0.000013046988,0.000024688994,0.00009993199,0.9351858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69175875,0.0036450964,0.0014019038,0.0018703856,0.00054575666,0.000019457799,0.000051824707,0.00011680337,0.30058995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992908,0.00037130594,0.000011631102,0.00008292891,0.00012393678,0.00011929198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990752,0.00044969138,0.00010363759,0.00011154099,0.000069620546,0.00019033207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006868741,0.00029361487,0.00010686341,0.0009174057,0.0027330585,0.006070133,0.00039375047,0.0015399635,0.02289424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015241781,0.00016168032,0.00013527315,0.0012276459,0.007291959,0.0036627825,0.0016272888,0.002993182,0.001978561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027614718,0.00007689931,0.0016608437,0.00008771739,0.0000030328097,0.00020692045,0.02882045,0.0002667486,0.00054575846,0.79761195,0.049535617,0.12115643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070533715,0.00005978694,0.004651461,0.0001761076,0.0000055077962,0.0002362036,0.012615664,0.00060235575,0.0008241621,0.030763842,0.95004666,0.000011187298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01014786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028613273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02289424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030450963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019291147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07658887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112173046","doi":"","title":"Women’s Legal Landmarks in the Interwar Years:Not for Want of Trying","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Field (mathematics); Legislation; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.05530742358835192,"score_gpt":0.3106666208981786,"score_spread":0.2553591973098267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112173046","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021557774,0.015318485,0.00034262452,0.084642954,0.0024663366,0.000017904767,0.000059044978,0.000038806415,0.87555605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55820733,0.0080074575,0.00036600808,0.01353269,0.0010315073,0.00005098045,0.00006450533,0.0001337626,0.4186057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985079,0.00061526574,0.000017966328,0.00007963272,0.00019588781,0.00058326457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883777,0.00046833756,0.000077300574,0.00006984098,0.00014612105,0.00040067593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019210404,0.00035599136,0.0003591767,0.0011686194,0.01611861,0.01212508,0.0009169185,0.0034938215,0.02191499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043401932,0.0002673515,0.00019098498,0.0021423632,0.018839924,0.0065189744,0.005573603,0.00767962,0.0020868548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025511354,0.000018346087,0.00034375026,0.000036137466,0.0000022723386,0.00016428219,0.08160201,0.000038063205,0.00004972859,0.79063106,0.101782344,0.025306486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005078389,0.000010379345,0.00070075656,0.0001856451,0.0000016454946,0.00004639052,0.07372451,0.000012910531,0.00006302808,0.028864486,0.8963772,0.00000797044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04192469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13251784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04192469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073357224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009162893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08336133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112740201","doi":"","title":"Misleading Innocence (tracing what a bridge can do):A Conversation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Armed Forces","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Innocence; Bridge (graph theory); Work (physics); Interrogation","score_opus":0.13283831341679408,"score_gpt":0.3238680762627073,"score_spread":0.19102976284591322,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112740201","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0922157,0.011908139,0.010754804,0.21340436,0.0042298636,0.00006470728,0.000085203144,0.00012804408,0.6672091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83498657,0.0048374324,0.0019666797,0.028864417,0.0010520932,0.000107011394,0.00005169978,0.00036437088,0.12776981],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921285,0.005934937,0.000087060595,0.00040101685,0.00084000843,0.0006086171],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99151903,0.007016246,0.00023539107,0.00030918387,0.00040020506,0.00052003574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009555053,0.00068413286,0.00056054513,0.0011884001,0.02212349,0.01278504,0.001672099,0.010799305,0.0068182824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0146694705,0.00059824955,0.00035667027,0.0014831066,0.0364028,0.023371374,0.009120392,0.015147145,0.0014718496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001653415,0.000012948802,0.00017758826,0.000041440588,0.000004054268,0.00050785695,0.75278485,0.000057721525,0.00019990372,0.21096191,0.02937547,0.0058597536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055310525,0.000015858273,0.00017461854,0.00033168474,0.0000052130968,0.00030084178,0.4070211,0.00016334877,0.00023771323,0.027637003,0.5640895,0.000017541628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017492814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023419512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02212349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063299923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035346046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05053258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7113894842","doi":"10.7202/1120912ar","title":"Courting Failure: Women and the Law in Twentieth-Century Literature","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atlantis Critical Studies in Gender Culture & Social Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics); Narrative","score_opus":0.0304743279280029,"score_gpt":0.3530781689622266,"score_spread":0.3226038410342237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7113894842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.239204,0.086814836,0.0014491527,0.19287887,0.0020253984,0.000030817395,0.000097160395,0.00003257114,0.4774672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9566119,0.00864514,0.00011916039,0.0077384454,0.0007825957,0.000018756744,0.000016808866,0.000025950521,0.026041273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979247,0.000946011,0.00006848341,0.00023297471,0.00025547473,0.00057225185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99529785,0.003475259,0.0003241736,0.00015574992,0.00033453444,0.00041240724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039286055,0.00033274095,0.00047058883,0.0033434203,0.018507997,0.016104385,0.0014765918,0.0054821675,0.0056671645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008197879,0.0002956125,0.00021753863,0.0036645439,0.046492793,0.00910265,0.0043157185,0.006596461,0.0002350511],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001153976,0.00001651055,0.0005015725,0.000041789557,0.000003922908,0.00023031983,0.12777115,0.000048516744,0.00005223132,0.8613618,0.0052875397,0.0046731173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002387503,0.00003309549,0.0038730244,0.00095694547,0.000015544094,0.00023250647,0.19604889,0.0002078813,0.00022028518,0.24592848,0.5524205,0.000038884053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057578027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074981585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057578027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012170273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068702428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1144858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114590171","doi":"","title":"Art law cases and controversies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Context (archaeology); Moral rights","score_opus":0.015685120758160278,"score_gpt":0.27063639675445644,"score_spread":0.2549512759962962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114590171","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013337345,0.0450869,0.0008892916,0.5257944,0.003203806,0.0000267403,0.000056257664,0.00003391107,0.41157138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6693019,0.033548757,0.00074894755,0.2315526,0.010223636,0.00014116288,0.000083119005,0.00010255675,0.054297216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9732819,0.0107836705,0.0009799807,0.0029605713,0.007446312,0.004547537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9587684,0.033730894,0.0019777322,0.0015937231,0.002120006,0.0018092026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024691153,0.00044798877,0.00074790214,0.0050539835,0.035178415,0.034352537,0.0043119583,0.031478774,0.012879379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05505439,0.000915841,0.0010317325,0.0062984345,0.084875,0.026259996,0.011471014,0.024455033,0.0014079396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056106305,0.00001914643,0.00013897885,0.00004455803,0.0000034502034,0.00020059939,0.0065261875,0.000051585394,0.000020632551,0.94628143,0.039706897,0.0070009525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013477521,0.00001300893,0.00074510375,0.0011035816,0.0000070004257,0.00038451538,0.036093958,0.00016567907,0.00009786006,0.29851857,0.6628191,0.00003817999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026912848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027788894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035178415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02138899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010311769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15518874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115032284","doi":"","title":"Re-thinking Being Human at Law in a World of Deceptive Design Patterns","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Interpretation (philosophy); Feature (linguistics)","score_opus":0.030315405094662205,"score_gpt":0.297965986675106,"score_spread":0.2676505815804438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115032284","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18341178,0.0017924514,0.40365872,0.029842563,0.00045153403,0.00016282243,0.00013792676,0.0005182882,0.38002384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93935716,0.00060885807,0.038228445,0.0011924272,0.00005540383,0.000105865634,0.00008144605,0.0002471859,0.020123156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935777,0.003407904,0.00020281626,0.001051777,0.0013029372,0.00045697045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894721,0.004576858,0.0010845353,0.00305952,0.0011346801,0.0006722319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006317216,0.0006084444,0.0004512801,0.0016979075,0.003687923,0.0109524615,0.0021811342,0.0034605183,0.008601647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016716314,0.00066420547,0.00080296263,0.0010167161,0.033510268,0.019032404,0.00554943,0.0044606845,0.0011925214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000350788,0.00002241866,0.0016020122,0.00010191982,0.000023604443,0.00021051014,0.061377577,0.0016980433,0.001146633,0.91501606,0.0019508726,0.016815297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029427209,0.00006122591,0.001656724,0.00019494664,0.00002949762,0.0005365803,0.029663965,0.0069670645,0.0011629128,0.8715961,0.08802685,0.00007482977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058585303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00554172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0109524615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036999315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002915872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116104964","doi":"10.5287/ora-4rzjjny5e","title":"Virtual court hearings: judicial perspective from Ontario judgments","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Adjudication; Economic Justice; Court of record; Trial court; Control (management); Judicial review; Supreme court","score_opus":0.027835526225732554,"score_gpt":0.2922698539073549,"score_spread":0.26443432768162234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116104964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7428408,0.004983688,0.0016029207,0.035656907,0.0002482766,0.00019158269,0.0011602532,0.000024446485,0.21329106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826987,0.0023472426,0.00055345707,0.0022638198,0.00006802852,0.000054444357,0.00018871616,0.000021519721,0.011804039],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852136,0.003565635,0.0007428541,0.001435805,0.0065090596,0.0025330766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701057,0.015994499,0.0034443596,0.0011252584,0.0073800753,0.00195013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008611134,0.00030401882,0.00046961597,0.0036957136,0.03193369,0.01281348,0.0021655313,0.0024718295,0.004136886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031855218,0.0005854476,0.00028824457,0.008025045,0.018468471,0.0041045053,0.004956221,0.002983707,0.00030948903],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008579881,0.000054401877,0.02431467,0.00038164473,0.000031817242,0.002260105,0.82216895,0.000405338,0.001396077,0.10247078,0.02397425,0.022456175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000152417115,0.000037810943,0.061650023,0.00075389445,0.00004650386,0.00026169178,0.7104342,0.0006596563,0.0006206967,0.009752756,0.21564282,0.00012472097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95429367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9822276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12683111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12683111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10647142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9202285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116309171","doi":"10.22215/ff/v5.i1.02","title":"If they close","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Facts & Frictions Emerging Debates Pedagogies and Practices in Contemporary Journalism","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Journalism; Narrative; Plan (archaeology); Politics; Consumption (sociology)","score_opus":0.09073740261946946,"score_gpt":0.4088411151198132,"score_spread":0.31810371250034375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116309171","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034150165,0.0044997428,0.0015877386,0.4379801,0.09956201,0.00032933144,0.0018510633,0.000659537,0.41938028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.120484665,0.002679981,0.0011526042,0.11951888,0.008791976,0.0002022928,0.00078738155,0.0005636486,0.7458186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630934,0.00041518267,0.00009331419,0.00042238052,0.001611706,0.0011480491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899116,0.00075222785,0.00068096473,0.00042281192,0.0045792796,0.0036530986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002473578,0.0004187979,0.0004729827,0.0008040867,0.0128295515,0.00942375,0.0009044002,0.0051769344,0.085631214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019191245,0.00035230542,0.00047188974,0.0006191511,0.004786837,0.006593675,0.0034583963,0.005108337,0.021523982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007360156,0.000026067415,0.0027919514,0.0000966187,0.000010043857,0.0005892276,0.017147353,0.000011355432,0.00081525685,0.005515973,0.9482597,0.024662865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006195303,0.000022512675,0.0027145178,0.00010471718,0.000007480541,0.00015744456,0.02791626,0.000009837498,0.00018201048,0.00096079765,0.9678922,0.000026016149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12156137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3350407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12156137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008764154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0099014845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.286465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118122381","doi":"10.17951/sil.2025.34.4.197-209","title":"The Phenomenon of “Pseudolaw”: Preliminary Characteristics","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studia Iuridica Lublinensia","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phenomenon; Legitimacy; Statutory law; State (computer science); Economic Justice; Scope (computer science); Value (mathematics); Ideology; Argument (complex analysis)","score_opus":0.01159205185223907,"score_gpt":0.2958561026488616,"score_spread":0.28426405079662254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118122381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7828041,0.003393759,0.014889062,0.005064164,0.00013083768,0.00031614988,0.0002925302,0.00008774181,0.19302164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946925,0.0006610777,0.0014536512,0.00013058048,0.000043135347,0.00008714752,0.00008543203,0.00002932595,0.0028170492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974406,0.000927267,0.00020672668,0.00045738107,0.000632245,0.00033579508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938351,0.0030059638,0.0010995022,0.00093826384,0.00083067757,0.00029049724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002723884,0.00024309814,0.00030310746,0.0030425119,0.0031928488,0.008415074,0.0007254602,0.0011753819,0.0049502607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009483182,0.0003193275,0.00027304323,0.003934858,0.013218636,0.009183591,0.0049508363,0.0022743326,0.00049766223],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006722012,0.00005430926,0.03211988,0.00026303463,0.000008513126,0.0014677459,0.33082443,0.00007958817,0.0014157053,0.5892782,0.0016162782,0.042804968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016761953,0.000112393434,0.095618196,0.00074746506,0.000025819225,0.004830473,0.42691982,0.0013707539,0.0020484969,0.12454264,0.3437061,0.00006119549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031024448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034993372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008415074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002307831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002039409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016744554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7124132092","doi":"10.31986/issn.2995-8288_vol2iss1.2","title":"Ontological Inquiry in The World of Law: Bringing Forth Subjective Experiencing from the Shadows","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Turning toward being :","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Value (mathematics); Field (mathematics); Scholarship; Space (punctuation); Being in the world","score_opus":0.05392676130082746,"score_gpt":0.3317247212375462,"score_spread":0.27779795993671874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7124132092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40143034,0.0072771916,0.12522042,0.05888036,0.001485112,0.00014696567,0.0001004787,0.00021143892,0.40524775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99052095,0.0007963465,0.003354772,0.0012656401,0.00010500918,0.000038142483,0.000017701397,0.000091111564,0.0038104563],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98141104,0.015209916,0.0002845727,0.00068078144,0.0015937703,0.0008198693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845509,0.010643953,0.0010236433,0.0014891039,0.001083993,0.0012084091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012412001,0.00072104996,0.0007281912,0.0024730277,0.01126942,0.017958993,0.0014840616,0.0029133654,0.002705111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021165857,0.00053346064,0.00067394285,0.0015586325,0.10654774,0.029227171,0.017018287,0.0068557183,0.0003095696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016644193,0.000016840968,0.0006571888,0.00006299053,0.000009628704,0.0001828817,0.6087985,0.0001289243,0.0004962988,0.38473615,0.0007551883,0.00413884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013635318,0.000052047617,0.0007395762,0.00022767388,0.000018632312,0.0002546746,0.54072475,0.0005880416,0.0006226342,0.39639175,0.060321078,0.00004542939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003847563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003247488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017958993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032051068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00328178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0656417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125682790","doi":"10.1515/9781773855196-056","title":"6.9 Wokeness Captures Alberta’s Law Society","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.02133643452821105,"score_gpt":0.2172334293850541,"score_spread":0.19589699485684306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125682790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016246699,0.0057675377,0.000494579,0.012268408,0.0009007602,0.000021941005,0.00010683818,0.00006240118,0.97875273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019818777,0.0013352279,0.00040027715,0.0028337275,0.00009642665,0.0000124749595,0.000045484652,0.000027224101,0.9754303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938,0.00008107763,0.000009987619,0.000071286224,0.00024512902,0.00021238277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973863,0.000041293206,0.000008767408,0.000020604559,0.0001250621,0.00006558421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005759076,0.00057127187,0.00019519652,0.0012322448,0.007492426,0.0061949566,0.0008106746,0.003605026,0.038653184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092644093,0.0003367028,0.00025776742,0.0010656613,0.004989653,0.0019287677,0.0015910798,0.0039789635,0.00649952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001083297,0.000013536719,0.00033656205,0.000025513007,0.0000019214483,0.00015386076,0.0027392053,0.00009908093,0.00015089649,0.5886879,0.38164183,0.026138887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019536806,0.0000028974293,0.00058202614,0.000050446335,0.0000012606563,0.000031418098,0.0007237798,0.000042941276,0.00005746507,0.011353588,0.9871472,0.0000049508817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.68575466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9037857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31424534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01952747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017528566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.632192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7125739495","doi":"10.3316/informit.t2026012000005201441708417","title":"Legislating truth: Comparative lessons from Canada's national truth-telling architecture for Australia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Australian indigenous issues","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queensland Government; University of New South Wales","keywords":"Architecture; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Legislation","score_opus":0.09044956374010207,"score_gpt":0.41083847685911395,"score_spread":0.32038891311901185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7125739495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64711237,0.0045671216,0.00180664,0.03981737,0.00026635974,0.0002116242,0.00020848,0.000045661443,0.3059644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853338,0.0011328035,0.00072657334,0.0015729002,0.000014391209,0.000037720773,0.000047451722,0.00001777835,0.011116457],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99020106,0.002497672,0.0002154041,0.000524124,0.0028144137,0.0037472893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834168,0.005525239,0.0006790964,0.000650594,0.0064687734,0.0032595585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007151495,0.00020778262,0.0005026181,0.002083869,0.029448777,0.010212293,0.0016837759,0.0019431101,0.003447827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01908206,0.00031054358,0.00028944304,0.0038924834,0.01279868,0.0026331563,0.005331965,0.003737051,0.00016289508],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013931151,0.000120331235,0.02165565,0.00037998633,0.000055206146,0.0012298191,0.48194945,0.0013149327,0.000666007,0.40691894,0.015708793,0.06986143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005836449,0.00012974688,0.10200271,0.0008728702,0.00013605424,0.00027988278,0.52457595,0.001952121,0.0008714354,0.019581221,0.34936723,0.00017249855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9905572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17647229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17647229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25988024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9551754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127627777","doi":"10.5040/9798216459156","title":"Ethnicity, Gender, and Diversity","year":2018,"lang":"","type":"book","venue":"Lexington Books","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Nationality; Cultural diversity; Sexual orientation; Empirical research; Variation (astronomy)","score_opus":0.06608318020729399,"score_gpt":0.2971529003269147,"score_spread":0.23106972011962074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127627777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0048702206,0.029224573,0.00021219294,0.008695544,0.0013597922,0.000012423658,0.00014997882,0.0000336804,0.9554415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07088201,0.023365315,0.0003120092,0.0035329226,0.00097443955,0.000058356458,0.00020760868,0.00008719833,0.90058005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997595,0.000077117904,0.000006653138,0.000027135962,0.000096908676,0.000032664364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979454,0.00007634187,0.000017872953,0.000014791871,0.000046011,0.000050410315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002734152,0.00031447274,0.00029934023,0.0005807849,0.0025465772,0.003645081,0.00033358904,0.00056053523,0.029676922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008115519,0.00015612342,0.00019083009,0.0009975097,0.0017481844,0.0025056421,0.0012014363,0.0011863767,0.005434724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026308315,0.000041019375,0.0021365634,0.00013376592,0.000007793867,0.00017471591,0.0134638315,0.00009223202,0.00020573121,0.31232667,0.5270873,0.14430402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002618249,0.00001315141,0.0034159124,0.00032901438,0.0000046633463,0.0001663997,0.004558589,0.00004410301,0.00007557223,0.021679243,0.9697045,0.000006199266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008779531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019159826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029676922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014932127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010519576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099279165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7127835651","doi":"","title":"The Practise of Obtaining Sacrifices of the Institution which has been Tabood (family): Levirate and Sororate","year":2015,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"DergiPark (Istanbul University)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hôtel-Dieu Grace Healthcare","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Government (linguistics); Control (management); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.049736734295384055,"score_gpt":0.24470502973775768,"score_spread":0.19496829544237362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7127835651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6160664,0.0066453866,0.0016815409,0.039911218,0.0011288594,0.000077621444,0.000060197017,0.00008862931,0.3343402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9305004,0.0007544653,0.00062984787,0.0017240115,0.00007454167,0.00001546288,0.0000082263905,0.000033857334,0.0662593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989428,0.00052129704,0.000037011636,0.00007684136,0.00010874031,0.00031336612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992974,0.00017017222,0.00012465213,0.000046774694,0.00013163354,0.00022937926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022561722,0.0003342018,0.00024259479,0.00039308477,0.016191892,0.0032612744,0.0009028767,0.002325718,0.008936434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020881363,0.00035882043,0.00019710099,0.00040474357,0.009114257,0.0015412611,0.0033763475,0.0035018956,0.00068660907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002453517,0.00015430186,0.007635919,0.00026700663,0.00003278938,0.0036646936,0.32163423,0.0002717033,0.0034435606,0.542381,0.0461309,0.07413863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032130753,0.00022150503,0.013611988,0.00033105156,0.000024929419,0.0027058255,0.2509842,0.00036423156,0.0020435017,0.011329178,0.7182855,0.0000658795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014164934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063278064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016191892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003964077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045227674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029895365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7131897780","doi":"10.1215/26923874-11928077","title":"Motion Practice (with <i>Portrait of Jason</i> )","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"liquid blackness","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Fordham University; Dartmouth College; York University; University of Minnesota; University of Cambridge; Yale University","keywords":"Portrait; Statutory law; Motion (physics); Reading (process); Work (physics); Dismissal","score_opus":0.007672563876727717,"score_gpt":0.29479905640562376,"score_spread":0.28712649252889605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7131897780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022800997,0.004023503,0.003423838,0.045723505,0.0021534145,0.000046147947,0.00006768221,0.00012151759,0.9216394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53823775,0.0031333088,0.0032228942,0.013736945,0.00086753484,0.0001304118,0.00006231608,0.00017673749,0.44043207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994215,0.00027771867,0.000016314902,0.00007737555,0.00011510292,0.00009199683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996669,0.00012980631,0.000037306185,0.000026915879,0.00005351259,0.00008559561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000606625,0.0002663694,0.00010302458,0.0009879661,0.005784103,0.0038161303,0.000498087,0.0017087586,0.013388887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013395495,0.00015367578,0.00017777293,0.00064094464,0.0072652125,0.002683251,0.0018116513,0.0025664698,0.0016588611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000308974,0.00003964086,0.0003590783,0.00005093017,0.0000014582397,0.00029488173,0.04521856,0.0001047273,0.001004438,0.79345995,0.12851202,0.0309233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002968465,0.00001884004,0.0006909511,0.00011319905,0.000001374663,0.00011904843,0.011344109,0.00012269735,0.00030910486,0.013734418,0.9735346,0.000008654258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017296042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02594351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017296042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029910794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015776865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044790328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132960430","doi":"","title":"Escaping the Desert: On Roberto Unger, Pragmatism, and Critical Legal Studies’ Heterogeneity","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deconstruction (building); Determinism; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Scholarship; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Focus (optics); Critical legal studies","score_opus":0.046536078610317264,"score_gpt":0.4385920445747175,"score_spread":0.39205596596440023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132960430","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07563602,0.06195079,0.016143773,0.5079523,0.001689436,0.000058699807,0.000052162108,0.00013632127,0.3363806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9449297,0.008970672,0.0032452124,0.02549566,0.0014239199,0.00013945217,0.000022155184,0.00014852961,0.015624674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821147,0.013818694,0.0002513369,0.0011599544,0.0017497493,0.00090560055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98367107,0.013259848,0.000766141,0.001100119,0.0007122672,0.0004905851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017191164,0.0006290927,0.0009089819,0.0040575354,0.011244608,0.017216818,0.0019883835,0.005106086,0.002350344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021192979,0.000375026,0.0004665189,0.0041817455,0.09678749,0.017687278,0.009587471,0.007170477,0.00039768257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047757317,0.0000062966237,0.000052066633,0.00001767445,0.0000010285213,0.00002232692,0.011799896,0.00006314885,0.000017632057,0.9825168,0.0030097843,0.0024884602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009956594,0.0000061931364,0.00012610362,0.0002484853,0.0000024727733,0.00004582397,0.012570919,0.0001950566,0.00007795142,0.89641935,0.090286635,0.000011019736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006700854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008101248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017216818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013742385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0089514265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09970844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132974009","doi":"","title":"Judicial Rhetoric and Its Discontents: The Critique of Forensic Oratory in Shakespeare, Jonson, and Spenser","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Rhetoric; Presupposition; Rhetorical question; Context (archaeology); Key (lock); Criticism; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.05377816073357151,"score_gpt":0.3640264995344846,"score_spread":0.3102483388009131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132974009","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04354903,0.13850239,0.0151254395,0.42064992,0.005178821,0.00005204745,0.000054433014,0.00010710634,0.3767808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9077137,0.023163423,0.003724526,0.03365539,0.005522581,0.00010103472,0.000026794449,0.00018272409,0.02590973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98175335,0.013433534,0.0003625883,0.0011816651,0.002393171,0.00087576295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96698284,0.02845393,0.0010825391,0.0008728453,0.0021471644,0.00046069094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022226738,0.0010061738,0.0011538282,0.006411988,0.018601425,0.019935476,0.0031790107,0.012827751,0.0025681404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03313379,0.00070983445,0.0006123378,0.0030736614,0.098448984,0.015536441,0.005370912,0.012875518,0.0005073969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000082528695,0.0000066294956,0.000047954894,0.000047135258,0.0000033948486,0.0000654573,0.030647011,0.000046834863,0.000025449204,0.9605952,0.0054807304,0.0030259416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040003135,0.000025040965,0.0004530263,0.0014605841,0.000020482092,0.00021876484,0.041877516,0.0005877437,0.00042152463,0.70387375,0.2509695,0.000052182433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020264832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020399995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022226738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013257397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010930516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11754763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133098712","doi":"","title":"Gender and Violence: Drawing on Indigenous Legal Resources","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Indigenous; Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Legislation; Traditional knowledge","score_opus":0.04255130445986358,"score_gpt":0.34677441879720083,"score_spread":0.30422311433733723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133098712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1845977,0.030104103,0.0026443203,0.25186947,0.0014133112,0.00007747221,0.00012106117,0.00002236681,0.5291502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9231844,0.0225607,0.0013224778,0.011356188,0.0002493225,0.00006327398,0.000033860564,0.000036483456,0.04119328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583024,0.0019522831,0.00005890714,0.00021419226,0.00083019835,0.0011143067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99479043,0.0031069163,0.00018397428,0.00014897111,0.0007349355,0.0010349194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055522467,0.00039639152,0.0005210765,0.0031394034,0.020903066,0.011193274,0.00198275,0.002687005,0.008866476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01020248,0.00025167776,0.00037219588,0.0030511448,0.030336218,0.007724803,0.008024635,0.0038234661,0.00032831027],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040825984,0.000040898307,0.009223761,0.00026256609,0.000029006418,0.0007933234,0.40871957,0.00019928729,0.00019735633,0.4829844,0.019940613,0.07756846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005754948,0.00002804747,0.013842481,0.0016581696,0.000032243053,0.00022864765,0.6918038,0.00018947513,0.00021850152,0.09793912,0.19400705,0.00004671978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55857015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82594633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55857015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022859659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03529053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.888059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7134418735","doi":"","title":"Conference Program -- Association for the Study of Law, Culture, &amp; the Humanities 14th Annual Conference","year":2011,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Theme (computing); Humanism; Association (psychology); Legal education","score_opus":0.14034440999475162,"score_gpt":0.34218667960056315,"score_spread":0.20184226960581153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7134418735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047338796,0.014448358,0.0019023947,0.07374624,0.06512386,0.00067711825,0.004108246,0.0008752847,0.8343847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013319541,0.004458044,0.0013131517,0.0030644352,0.0065494925,0.00069218595,0.0022939413,0.00038257666,0.96792656],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975758,0.00049558346,0.000100030586,0.00031086677,0.0009336374,0.000584093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929301,0.00045550606,0.00017792739,0.00036053895,0.0023699105,0.0037060098],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055269683,0.0010811259,0.0007495754,0.001911349,0.0044979462,0.008358375,0.0014832966,0.0028354672,0.33102238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004534093,0.0004112653,0.00059402396,0.0015449146,0.00095718715,0.0035532198,0.006195288,0.0037863674,0.1359621],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002810968,0.000050740164,0.00022790598,0.000074493364,0.0000022221102,0.000030400768,0.0001266602,0.000014325358,0.00012653127,0.002298871,0.9726949,0.024325006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005783781,0.000015642114,0.0010329572,0.00012150665,0.0000018512802,0.000023029374,0.00032080463,0.000030126848,0.000089498506,0.0003505713,0.99800175,0.0000065837894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00486602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012167425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6689776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031350548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074716294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9542154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135597851","doi":"","title":"Methods of reconciling internal and international conflicts and the concept of \"transitional justice\"","year":2016,"lang":"cs","type":"dissertation","venue":"Digital Repository (National Repository of Grey Literature)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Vetting; Transitional justice; Human rights; Rule of law; Principle of legality; International law; International human rights law; Public international law; Fundamental rights; Democracy","score_opus":0.015136761799713851,"score_gpt":0.32226469195873947,"score_spread":0.3071279301590256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135597851","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008664582,0.007310281,0.6330013,0.021478228,0.0015625077,0.0010473751,0.00026274804,0.00072903134,0.32594392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27667612,0.0068527465,0.6615575,0.0026197825,0.00050370215,0.0025932617,0.00035462287,0.0004822818,0.048359867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98418736,0.011343957,0.00054049207,0.0011598793,0.0022105514,0.00055778265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864595,0.008232566,0.0012891862,0.00234982,0.0013147698,0.0003541628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01734247,0.0011906226,0.0011623041,0.006553583,0.0060773897,0.01285436,0.0039791483,0.0038760887,0.012994778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026094181,0.00057219225,0.0015712805,0.005774878,0.025803078,0.015439809,0.01192208,0.0041254493,0.002464581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012113268,0.000040097628,0.00033172034,0.00028894254,0.00003132844,0.000079457765,0.006691554,0.001287244,0.00014033269,0.9141663,0.0062666205,0.070664264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001534247,0.000029601712,0.00040678532,0.0005822973,0.000026595708,0.00017942682,0.0068135485,0.0026975966,0.00040330246,0.84505206,0.14376213,0.00003130314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031602338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005901049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01734247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062002903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013028306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091716826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135774494","doi":"","title":"Introduction: Precedents as Rules and Practice","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.043090224819027224,"score_gpt":0.333555459633878,"score_spread":0.29046523481485076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135774494","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044039353,0.08718467,0.04485045,0.35162017,0.042159274,0.00014924072,0.0034061265,0.00043913137,0.4657871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23868357,0.0689551,0.03627963,0.1139986,0.067353256,0.00062802376,0.0037187662,0.0012949219,0.4690881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973463,0.0013655227,0.0001318848,0.00058418,0.0004208124,0.00015140304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98895234,0.009132041,0.00025696983,0.00045095957,0.0009030298,0.000304671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027832745,0.00077623565,0.0007589032,0.0014798498,0.0024550415,0.007907467,0.0019214436,0.0065854187,0.051410254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0083987685,0.00075220293,0.0007377927,0.0033474807,0.00696907,0.009621867,0.002009949,0.00808962,0.009851395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016094164,0.000013968751,0.00009944585,0.00022931112,0.0000045698866,0.000028557191,0.0012100355,0.00022962735,0.00004753356,0.8344661,0.1547955,0.008859262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017614126,0.000010961023,0.00039583983,0.00050342694,0.000008596844,0.000054261953,0.0007521427,0.00025053124,0.00007226021,0.26529345,0.73262423,0.000016694352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073727528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005943945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051410254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033692904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029580067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17198443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135797986","doi":"","title":"Nouvelles difficultes du langage du droit au Canada. Dits et maux de Themis. Gemar, Jean-Claude &amp; Vo, Ho-Thuy, Unversite de Montreal: Les éditions themis, 2016.","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"LaCRIS (University of Lapland)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Reading (process); Qualitative research; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.011433028894348721,"score_gpt":0.21779237551242717,"score_spread":0.20635934661807845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135797986","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09755682,0.23214732,0.0042154025,0.19765785,0.0035179432,0.00009199666,0.003247886,0.00037141243,0.46119335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55863506,0.06301091,0.0042985645,0.006550926,0.00030926,0.00006467011,0.0008382238,0.00032302385,0.3659693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964489,0.00042978796,0.00013148734,0.000376172,0.0018544568,0.00075919443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99519426,0.00079877867,0.0002562788,0.00015492564,0.0029885208,0.0006072217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002254082,0.00077003735,0.00047547254,0.0023590433,0.014191219,0.0100941975,0.0017186014,0.0028551612,0.015132015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070239175,0.0007822549,0.00048947765,0.004421687,0.008812088,0.0040594838,0.0023791138,0.004694153,0.0011978579],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008725027,0.00007689345,0.010493446,0.0006516481,0.000042133335,0.0010568057,0.13631862,0.0006893385,0.001199947,0.3263117,0.30251125,0.22056098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000101054475,0.000016758577,0.020615531,0.0008967302,0.000030742358,0.00029847497,0.060864113,0.000314481,0.0005998364,0.00685419,0.909402,0.00009696942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99718297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09150358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09150358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13108118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66390806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7151526309","doi":"10.70675/ae1ee573zfb4bz4643z86a4z907df293a97d","title":"Étude comparée de la police du cinéma (France, Belgique, Grande-Bretagne, Canada et Australie)","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poison control; State police; Police department","score_opus":0.0072793325671657765,"score_gpt":0.30100968419575674,"score_spread":0.29373035162859096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7151526309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8653464,0.008024681,0.0014228754,0.002791393,0.00021084993,0.00018617825,0.003056152,0.00006509322,0.11889649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97400576,0.0030623523,0.0007390891,0.00040415864,0.00004643976,0.00010212028,0.0009679094,0.000059059636,0.020613225],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980159,0.00056112075,0.0000535876,0.00024085793,0.00051388465,0.0006147245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99511456,0.0013641058,0.0008245505,0.000101603495,0.0020596422,0.00053553056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001737461,0.000385561,0.00044349802,0.0044992194,0.005127111,0.005514797,0.0005882117,0.0006031696,0.009423876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007198489,0.00032091784,0.00030253813,0.006665066,0.0027657424,0.00181433,0.0017157195,0.001087056,0.000612531],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045004152,0.000113459326,0.18000585,0.0013454234,0.00021561456,0.0010716897,0.64418006,0.00060733245,0.0028300826,0.023872444,0.021288224,0.12401978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011450217,0.000057145702,0.5705238,0.0006130312,0.00005427169,0.00029137734,0.29884842,0.0002472607,0.00038821553,0.00040377883,0.12851696,0.000044408156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76637673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8783009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23362327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017581074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01321085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46999824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7152493818","doi":"10.70675/57d60690z9ce8z4a91z8838z3f7d1f84d7be","title":"Nommer le Royaume-Uni : la classification des formes politiques au prisme des traditions savantes britannique, française et canadienne","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Ethnography; History of science","score_opus":0.04364708242116021,"score_gpt":0.3312498367974371,"score_spread":0.28760275437627686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7152493818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27875715,0.016355364,0.00744031,0.017186988,0.00034839503,0.00012367005,0.00024003118,0.0000950122,0.67945313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96252614,0.0022088853,0.0024913365,0.00045871266,0.000054873002,0.000100685684,0.00008585656,0.000028970857,0.03204443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99630296,0.0015104755,0.00017793688,0.00039614204,0.0010840885,0.0005283672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491537,0.0018159924,0.00076239335,0.0006130625,0.0013146513,0.00057860714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004505988,0.0004687115,0.0004595297,0.0047461977,0.0067588137,0.008371914,0.00079949485,0.0012958044,0.008142085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058101155,0.00028428825,0.0003137636,0.004924585,0.017715286,0.005651914,0.003957247,0.0023113724,0.0007666879],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070416354,0.000018057615,0.01166092,0.00022560109,0.00002384258,0.00011176098,0.084984526,0.0002639799,0.00074336166,0.8589566,0.0031225618,0.03981843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035326782,0.00017203695,0.17113738,0.002133504,0.00012359455,0.0004194985,0.12257917,0.002499982,0.0016256217,0.19277261,0.5062491,0.00025216053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1566712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23558201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84332883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016230464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011802482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31151855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7153673297","doi":"","title":"Доступ до правосуддя в Канаді: вартий уваги досвід","year":2023,"lang":"uk","type":"article","venue":"Scientific periodicals of Ukraine","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Dialog box; De facto; Public policy; Public participation; Accountability","score_opus":0.03600754896594906,"score_gpt":0.32894108755193524,"score_spread":0.2929335385859862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7153673297","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06024149,0.010767408,0.06702892,0.00968679,0.0010840438,0.00021517539,0.0008016273,0.00043718514,0.84973735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71344024,0.010260456,0.047501545,0.00082375685,0.00031846567,0.00020979391,0.0004253303,0.00041925404,0.22660115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978397,0.00031232915,0.00008688242,0.00025635498,0.0011858913,0.00031875764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987184,0.00032871112,0.00013611754,0.00016545919,0.00047384176,0.00017752805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015783686,0.00038988996,0.00024840908,0.0021636155,0.0042027025,0.006183345,0.00057889207,0.0011583881,0.01985527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037210865,0.0004962097,0.00041355888,0.0023012387,0.0056166267,0.0017404965,0.0018590718,0.0020022248,0.0061374926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005413374,0.0000220396,0.0021646009,0.00016838415,0.00001347755,0.000750985,0.008369019,0.0006389356,0.0025659862,0.85876834,0.0112454975,0.11523857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015744368,0.000025273397,0.007965661,0.00022013167,0.00003112968,0.00071962853,0.004123686,0.0006957277,0.0027683796,0.10803656,0.8753262,0.00007191143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1426171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18133087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00763501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012440763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.283574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7154855712","doi":"10.59236/emro.v27i10a125","title":"Without Precedent","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Educational Media Reviews Online","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Praise; Duty; Authorization; Negotiation; Human rights","score_opus":0.04355937275903739,"score_gpt":0.4077744772586872,"score_spread":0.36421510449964983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7154855712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034813708,0.0027076378,0.00063328684,0.0106840255,0.012245681,0.00008467007,0.0006477421,0.00017808907,0.9724708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024656542,0.00065040623,0.00019065959,0.003634814,0.00063374656,0.000031329808,0.00019549578,0.0000796244,0.9921183],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998343,0.00020840872,0.00009312911,0.0004095452,0.0006475425,0.0002983675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983443,0.00021762295,0.00006394449,0.0003306801,0.00069995696,0.00034357264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001241633,0.00066428777,0.000490471,0.00096188067,0.0066341297,0.0070680035,0.0017540584,0.0050154454,0.5051111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050364262,0.00051051937,0.0004699433,0.00089227763,0.0018706333,0.0042008213,0.0038322976,0.0056485953,0.3132513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014959345,0.000021573425,0.00008345467,0.00006447414,0.0000022633444,0.00010670616,0.0002069717,0.000018032459,0.0001573684,0.054222845,0.9190563,0.026045058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011476527,0.0000021625426,0.000045556182,0.00003374939,5.3498866e-7,0.000018476905,0.000054373857,0.0000068618447,0.000030097852,0.0009377689,0.9988675,0.000001646122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014320146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034180067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5051111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032990435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049016573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70589894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7157521244","doi":"","title":"The Design Law Treaty on Traditional Cultural Expressions","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Treaty; State (computer science); International law; Forum shopping","score_opus":0.08410989294336128,"score_gpt":0.3312636462258929,"score_spread":0.24715375328253159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7157521244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015986717,0.0044441647,0.0070115416,0.03439957,0.0030077177,0.00005307416,0.00013840187,0.00013362682,0.9492132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11123429,0.00335706,0.00422736,0.044456646,0.0018923475,0.00033132645,0.00014450347,0.0003345846,0.83402187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99027914,0.004180916,0.0003609608,0.0010480928,0.0033162378,0.00081456034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99562424,0.001748168,0.00017216249,0.0010122083,0.001235113,0.00020809127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00705041,0.00067131943,0.00041707497,0.0010900109,0.007939075,0.011135347,0.0012158041,0.0058522103,0.025367243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01106536,0.00043961176,0.0006326444,0.0010710021,0.019421281,0.0046964395,0.0037975663,0.008457791,0.0068272455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010754413,0.0000074721183,0.00007577033,0.000028783403,0.0000024098715,0.000019636047,0.0015371037,0.000056342324,0.00010133584,0.8628623,0.124957666,0.0103403535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007157671,0.000014308553,0.0001712001,0.00021253554,0.0000055882924,0.00005135018,0.0006433082,0.00008006406,0.00018168069,0.05323269,0.9453884,0.000011755782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026129883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033572383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026129883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075681815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008907026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084861815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162094304","doi":"10.82308/19053","title":"A legal geographic perspective on a critical legal pluralism","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); Perspective (graphical); Relation (database)","score_opus":0.009854070184110603,"score_gpt":0.33944815088998237,"score_spread":0.32959408070587176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162094304","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034237847,0.014697235,0.03834035,0.16435687,0.0010958508,0.000056085522,0.00013094672,0.00007288726,0.74701196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9436256,0.006267605,0.0060852948,0.006930408,0.00119359,0.00012980877,0.00004631044,0.00010187797,0.035619356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954554,0.0030790304,0.00009853564,0.0005043387,0.0005140233,0.00034865158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956103,0.0028984908,0.0003901534,0.0003680478,0.0004980976,0.00023499357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042183134,0.00056163373,0.0004966974,0.003722605,0.009371397,0.010772812,0.0016445653,0.0048332154,0.006603327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005590026,0.00034123356,0.0004815983,0.0037380827,0.052908298,0.011337616,0.0058427243,0.00463762,0.00045208135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011081446,0.0000010131079,0.000031954645,0.000011039723,5.837474e-7,0.000027509874,0.0036472164,0.00006129049,0.000013215768,0.9948639,0.0006993592,0.0006417185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009152057,0.000006297997,0.0001896512,0.00014596792,0.000004058188,0.000082315266,0.012926246,0.00022975476,0.0000908148,0.857168,0.12914084,0.000006833426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017087184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015051569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017087184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012096744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057662902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087768435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162103473","doi":"10.82308/32206","title":"The uncanny doubling of sovereign and citizen: anti-state narrativity in Alberta","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; State (computer science); Uncanny; Narrativity; Sovereign state; State of exception; Autoethnography; Ethnography","score_opus":0.0171419896066181,"score_gpt":0.29301042827855256,"score_spread":0.27586843867193445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162103473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82795405,0.0020806075,0.0011639849,0.010999887,0.00030251118,0.000023249246,0.000105180596,0.000057359055,0.15731308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829685,0.0005886902,0.00024363249,0.00092105794,0.000020272475,0.000007842779,0.00003502472,0.000032182485,0.015182747],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99766326,0.0011333307,0.000029434863,0.00022072023,0.0004081625,0.00054510956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978637,0.001147479,0.00013739886,0.000093741764,0.000317075,0.00044057917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021643147,0.00039045123,0.00041739672,0.0010804192,0.03123754,0.010645161,0.0018142737,0.0020102235,0.00384548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003287555,0.00028866396,0.00022193592,0.002004324,0.028022684,0.0024279752,0.005210485,0.003584854,0.0002831916],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027330758,0.000008560506,0.0016826041,0.0000228603,0.0000041354465,0.00069547794,0.9757243,0.00007372946,0.00029773475,0.01537136,0.0031653284,0.0029266656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002078269,0.0000067873802,0.002674971,0.00008544056,0.000007046743,0.00014821814,0.91799784,0.000103801765,0.00014833453,0.0020579142,0.07674426,0.000023279557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9062728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96595675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09372717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04954481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026138997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35947442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164887009","doi":"10.1080/17153379.2014.12557056","title":"Law’s Anthropology: From Ethnography to Expert Testimony in Native Title.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Knowledge production","score_opus":0.022823677883130174,"score_gpt":0.31231218110203485,"score_spread":0.2894885032189047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164887009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82474416,0.007194022,0.0038996993,0.024735156,0.0005034499,0.00023121494,0.00033902784,0.000027262764,0.13832599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854565,0.0032826734,0.0013197614,0.002383031,0.00016671982,0.00013836885,0.00008350309,0.000024385638,0.007145052],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889452,0.009449323,0.0002833041,0.00041004742,0.0004655122,0.00044656234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624215,0.03286183,0.0014434152,0.001133411,0.001301938,0.00083787355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009654679,0.00024279102,0.00020948982,0.0026356094,0.00878257,0.0043772613,0.0010825513,0.0020431022,0.0040455637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034101587,0.00038919793,0.00011269706,0.0023321896,0.009800711,0.006669952,0.005250133,0.0029849908,0.00034835262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010487535,0.000038551312,0.0028765104,0.000092885486,0.0000043900964,0.00054067955,0.9751405,0.000014213417,0.00020252043,0.0047594896,0.0036360992,0.012683719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024573587,0.000020474567,0.0075698593,0.0003822744,0.0000047328,0.0004151136,0.93883497,0.000053371405,0.00025496335,0.0026931667,0.049760472,0.000008094555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013119235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037134934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013119235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022132925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036703967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051059484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164894033","doi":"10.1080/17153379.2025.12558745","title":"Ghost Citizens: Decolonial Apparitions of Stateless, Foreign and Wayward Figures in Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign relations","score_opus":0.010391234379617486,"score_gpt":0.27340572858573886,"score_spread":0.2630144942061214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164894033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8979288,0.00020763135,0.0003573013,0.009015475,0.00020228456,0.000021682386,0.00002465005,0.000022644934,0.0922195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97896475,0.00007085008,0.00011200189,0.001336228,0.000020962967,0.000011073308,0.0000102354725,0.000017693865,0.019456109],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978514,0.00087768753,0.00004624689,0.00019152375,0.0002515346,0.0007816248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960406,0.0015666807,0.00064057234,0.00048527788,0.0003924634,0.0008743895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028514438,0.00016693794,0.00023522909,0.0010879185,0.019753087,0.006842025,0.00091424165,0.0026085158,0.007764962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009793281,0.0003186967,0.00016297726,0.0012768588,0.016754456,0.00474131,0.007723696,0.005790952,0.0005185404],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006305404,0.0000744395,0.017685806,0.000023393313,0.0000051442275,0.00073592394,0.848502,0.000024079454,0.00031992636,0.10579901,0.012161689,0.014605631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008811264,0.000038968952,0.011036767,0.00008297859,0.000011364691,0.00041387856,0.9061385,0.00012650108,0.000378669,0.008454693,0.07328683,0.000022016555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027005613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06565907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027005613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003069758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005408944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05369687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164900119","doi":"10.1080/17153379.2004.12554143","title":"Breaking Spears and Mending Hearts: Peacemakers and Restorative Justice in Bougainville.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Restorative justice; Economic Justice; Transitional justice; Social justice","score_opus":0.018269041092578434,"score_gpt":0.2839058793758076,"score_spread":0.26563683828322915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164900119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5355637,0.013912024,0.0008583306,0.20029618,0.0010698012,0.000113833856,0.00009655741,0.000041461586,0.24804814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9517854,0.002374141,0.00031380035,0.009185163,0.00006742226,0.00004700709,0.000026852427,0.000019165216,0.036181137],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983375,0.00080747536,0.000022527109,0.000115305964,0.000100880185,0.0006162876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858415,0.0006355863,0.00012358649,0.000033695924,0.00015985992,0.00046312885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016810178,0.0002751141,0.00017576637,0.0005379589,0.028351199,0.0051070256,0.001470343,0.0032226236,0.0070521026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053434107,0.00021781902,0.00012161156,0.00055784656,0.014339692,0.003253201,0.0048471964,0.0078656655,0.0002849151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000678044,0.00016078247,0.00994798,0.0001019448,0.000012559646,0.0021871077,0.73478544,0.00014361886,0.00036432574,0.14807224,0.058335446,0.0458208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020876907,0.000038068418,0.012339935,0.00018241326,0.000016804674,0.00024244732,0.77450055,0.00010566123,0.00023718228,0.0094992565,0.20278607,0.000030631807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6378405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88692147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6378405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008380251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01628218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72858465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164938103","doi":"10.7202/1126132ar","title":"La pédagogie du droit à l’ère de la transition socioécologique : pour une démarche tranquille, conviviale et collective vers la postcroissance","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Communitas","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Private life; Proposition","score_opus":0.02961194688416812,"score_gpt":0.3381695754783062,"score_spread":0.30855762859413804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164938103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49897957,0.009066637,0.025863329,0.07200029,0.00087890436,0.00019041458,0.00006527791,0.00013486508,0.39282078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9634613,0.0018159224,0.0025860067,0.001009429,0.00006186672,0.00007915666,0.000017465027,0.000033634427,0.030935107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835724,0.0009029952,0.00003824399,0.0001623132,0.0001888095,0.00035047717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984384,0.0006731179,0.00013752178,0.00011404284,0.00017308319,0.00046384596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002731628,0.00027729422,0.00023797492,0.0006119206,0.0052712904,0.00562726,0.0008406938,0.0018352984,0.008328478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027337319,0.00016190141,0.00027858154,0.0005222258,0.011380621,0.0050232396,0.004630511,0.003924359,0.000990766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033174514,0.00015224765,0.003943103,0.00015564286,0.0000046202745,0.00035630265,0.24791239,0.00023136157,0.0011727646,0.679757,0.0031786168,0.06310282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019552092,0.00020700015,0.014255434,0.0009267138,0.000007955821,0.00034083475,0.3257582,0.00048440954,0.0016855504,0.11574452,0.54052454,0.00004529117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010597223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023205096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010597223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061718365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010690211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044780016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7400169","doi":"10.1016/0021-9290(80)90033-0","title":"Feminized not Feminist Justice at the Toronto Women’s Court","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jotwell: The Journal of Things We Like","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dozen; Contradiction; Economic Justice; White (mutation); Law; Sociology; Gender studies; Space (punctuation); Cover (algebra); Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.031045522289231176,"score_gpt":0.2826608192296162,"score_spread":0.25161529694038504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7400169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011119138,0.034800004,0.000685609,0.10954735,0.0057331147,0.000027431652,0.00016673905,0.00007619454,0.83784443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23798552,0.007837872,0.000307961,0.011678135,0.0010882898,0.000037939808,0.000060525617,0.000096272866,0.7409075],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848926,0.00038409609,0.000020770118,0.00012352457,0.0004952536,0.0004871422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990821,0.00023089454,0.000064996064,0.00007161693,0.00020196757,0.00034840172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007604227,0.00045666684,0.00025292236,0.00047540886,0.015876183,0.007825838,0.00080070447,0.003337367,0.020684768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021233542,0.00033074565,0.0001969263,0.0009527584,0.012991055,0.0021701304,0.0022046503,0.00425386,0.0020195923],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016543936,0.0000072367593,0.00051349186,0.00006944709,0.00000516998,0.0003432804,0.033694234,0.000099928584,0.00027350994,0.35568967,0.5909005,0.018386988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030601252,0.0000051055445,0.0013775214,0.00013274419,0.00000312434,0.00007351028,0.01184584,0.00003673907,0.000080924416,0.004978012,0.9814547,0.000008579895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7546631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92274576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24533689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04425545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026265118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4935634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W74351683","doi":"","title":"Adopting the Governmentality Approach Obscenity and Indecency: Tracking Harm Through Discourse of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Governmentality; Harm; Political science; First amendment; Law; Tracking (education); Sociology; Law and economics; Politics","score_opus":0.014903536843349852,"score_gpt":0.26198777840274856,"score_spread":0.2470842415593987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W74351683","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63137674,0.00693224,0.0035638027,0.05508608,0.00016592667,0.000108125525,0.0005902251,0.00006563926,0.30211118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98666847,0.0017090138,0.0007059134,0.0014926547,0.000019450266,0.00002370738,0.00007480215,0.000035481764,0.009270505],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903295,0.0018721836,0.00020169778,0.00086782605,0.0044250707,0.0023037563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805047,0.008820793,0.0014899631,0.0006391519,0.0070237215,0.0015216729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005962063,0.00046805892,0.0008174914,0.005877451,0.043917466,0.023643505,0.002765904,0.0044059427,0.0040516816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029189058,0.0005936479,0.00042292714,0.011311712,0.038002312,0.007184514,0.007885498,0.0077166567,0.00023066765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039650302,0.000028683373,0.017677914,0.00013299168,0.000023012268,0.00031505738,0.5253705,0.0006197045,0.00067836774,0.42268923,0.008526627,0.023898302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020048717,0.000030970907,0.052043162,0.0008866322,0.000099085635,0.00013737877,0.6144429,0.0014602774,0.001281998,0.05587768,0.273511,0.00020884897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99628204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28334764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28334764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31169674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83121514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W751532157","doi":"","title":"Slipping between Danger, Pleasure and the Law: Thoughts on Three Recent Books Addressing Sexuality","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human sexuality; Sociology; Pleasure; Feminist legal theory; Supreme court; Law; Oppression; Jurisprudence; Gender studies; Feminism; Political science; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.060149122344419874,"score_gpt":0.31815164927915457,"score_spread":0.2580025269347347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W751532157","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001340177,0.86697686,0.00051790656,0.04893806,0.012569704,0.000040088576,0.0001267398,0.00003616986,0.06945431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016262474,0.7247841,0.0014146605,0.04399802,0.013443969,0.00017341686,0.00039830513,0.00017130318,0.19935383],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865484,0.00034995266,0.00007007942,0.00014076279,0.00061086396,0.00017340972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982151,0.0010897112,0.00014894622,0.00004521278,0.00032176156,0.00017929457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011013462,0.0010109614,0.001068629,0.0041154586,0.0033067788,0.01006468,0.0014520634,0.0040688002,0.020279905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030947574,0.0005761278,0.00090824993,0.007429019,0.0060295803,0.01015129,0.0028927126,0.005429688,0.0050398065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003453421,0.000044513385,0.00029249288,0.0016533502,0.000020961344,0.00034983654,0.012835294,0.000094654824,0.00028133433,0.05655974,0.83418137,0.09365193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034653976,0.000008718634,0.00037725826,0.0013178247,0.0000062032314,0.00022206546,0.003940813,0.00001253625,0.000033294527,0.0032867666,0.99077904,0.000011923041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00831577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016669972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020279905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003999993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00408852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06784308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W754047603","doi":"10.46743/1082-7307/2005.1054","title":"Selling Mediation: Mimetic, Distancing, and Appellating Practices in the Marketing of an Emerging Profession","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Peace and Conflict Studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Public relations; Party-directed mediation; Context (archaeology); Transformative mediation; Adversarial system; Distancing; Political science; Appeal; Business; Marketing; Presentation (obstetrics); Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.06557907699427055,"score_gpt":0.40434834459297275,"score_spread":0.3387692675987022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W754047603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77771825,0.0023784789,0.0100886375,0.012945495,0.00016652491,0.00008608628,0.000010649501,0.00005784164,0.19654806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99440306,0.00038525538,0.0012435815,0.00042049427,0.00004818984,0.000017049877,0.000002192213,0.00001437245,0.0034657877],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937262,0.0048987577,0.00009382442,0.00024036052,0.00069609954,0.00034480364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98960084,0.0075225607,0.0013676957,0.0006193383,0.00027548085,0.0006140262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007439132,0.0004002841,0.00023283152,0.0013168951,0.01067441,0.010324619,0.0011965967,0.003100923,0.0045641246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0123465685,0.0002713447,0.00023301208,0.0011953424,0.030666856,0.007333153,0.006278857,0.00436307,0.00040971095],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006772741,0.00017157347,0.0045662127,0.00013926692,0.000008042802,0.0019467452,0.6902339,0.00009320125,0.0022927308,0.273054,0.0010990213,0.026327595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004836708,0.00034448746,0.007223943,0.00041115176,0.000029345802,0.0048613334,0.79230654,0.0013968764,0.0032402736,0.071103856,0.11897878,0.000055102515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012144638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026821843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01067441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025901294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018114238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039342403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W760777182","doi":"","title":"L'éthique à l'écran. Compte-rendu de What's Good on TV? – Understanding Ethics Through Television, de Jamie Watson et Robert Arp, et de Seeing the Light – Exploring Ethics Through Movies, de Wanday Teays","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Watson; Humanities; Sociology; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.06801653640110789,"score_gpt":0.27404513094760735,"score_spread":0.20602859454649947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W760777182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008040615,0.062525995,0.004581542,0.28538132,0.00435711,0.000035084795,0.00015932416,0.0001386481,0.6347804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38490835,0.027810385,0.0038133722,0.021708958,0.0030061866,0.00012390064,0.000089579094,0.00034732727,0.55819196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99669075,0.00212539,0.000051337778,0.00022753721,0.0006590478,0.00024593863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975713,0.0013036024,0.00016776996,0.00018001493,0.00048129537,0.0002960298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00283967,0.0005209208,0.00029123202,0.000741878,0.004568006,0.008343638,0.0006374926,0.0028293892,0.019848209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052284077,0.00033929548,0.00027379606,0.00077589625,0.011528813,0.005280961,0.0020471818,0.0051172073,0.002841245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029826393,0.000027549626,0.00041289514,0.00012501793,0.000007915548,0.00012363594,0.0107827,0.0001384765,0.0004191206,0.7229263,0.22421154,0.04079497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000088553015,0.000008552849,0.0012139617,0.00019538433,0.000002691263,0.00008779809,0.0048470097,0.00011038573,0.00032119377,0.032582376,0.9606096,0.000012153847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10344984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09597087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10344984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092345355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006745568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20569533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W762684748","doi":"","title":"The Chilly Climate for Women Judges: Reflections on the Backlash from the Ewanchuk Case","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Adjudication; Political science; Social justice; Ethnology; Sociology; Law; Art; Criminology","score_opus":0.022078863090237832,"score_gpt":0.31152233770752225,"score_spread":0.2894434746172844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W762684748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5106704,0.008797029,0.0013720356,0.26401767,0.0024270306,0.00015632474,0.000056881225,0.000040345985,0.21246232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92871445,0.0014958058,0.0002919617,0.038969815,0.00035400692,0.00013970694,0.000012949479,0.000056734465,0.029964501],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9748283,0.014087179,0.0004722963,0.0014306972,0.0023870654,0.006794532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910193,0.0062379353,0.0006833309,0.00024781277,0.00060263294,0.0012089986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016637573,0.0005898921,0.0007536982,0.0017974132,0.060362373,0.023950623,0.0027855253,0.017735567,0.0071613914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021321723,0.0010698915,0.00063248916,0.0018587667,0.033882927,0.008278685,0.016237943,0.016059032,0.0007376324],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084460306,0.00008211296,0.0039158887,0.00012600317,0.000016145148,0.0067534433,0.71808565,0.00009719274,0.001298293,0.24367884,0.01648919,0.009372838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000264809,0.00007048373,0.004039714,0.0004415519,0.000021887296,0.00088521687,0.7438705,0.00014267996,0.00082411093,0.016317882,0.23326313,0.000096428164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10091903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20747799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10091903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019668313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014234533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20066327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W772136316","doi":"","title":"The Structure of Dialogue: Exploring Habermas' Discourse Theory to Explain the \"Magic\" and Potential of Restorative Justice Processes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Communicative action; Humanities; Epistemology; Restorative justice; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020523470652013275,"score_gpt":0.28093022178596144,"score_spread":0.2604067511339482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W772136316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21964811,0.028175365,0.24784344,0.104679726,0.0015670881,0.0005853095,0.00019703452,0.0003916984,0.39691222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745806,0.0019475861,0.014874252,0.0013361847,0.00017455185,0.00024090888,0.000040678584,0.0000720253,0.0067332746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771294,0.01948641,0.00039713734,0.0010056868,0.0012161144,0.0007653117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812397,0.015571358,0.0011213039,0.0007143028,0.00076253683,0.00059086084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015974982,0.00079892174,0.0008643648,0.0044469186,0.013477079,0.013732391,0.003148744,0.006050412,0.003746111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021227777,0.00062952546,0.00093420886,0.0028229537,0.0545572,0.028567035,0.012334207,0.007260812,0.000596037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019422301,0.000016973843,0.00019219921,0.000086824344,0.000005153249,0.000164794,0.19116893,0.00024878688,0.00018963404,0.80309904,0.0006423275,0.0041659535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005901634,0.000065571294,0.000473252,0.0006307584,0.000020725041,0.00032665743,0.15295146,0.003846995,0.00070742966,0.71973294,0.12113488,0.00005036577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005382004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036296921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015974982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012377615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056443224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08980632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W796918528","doi":"","title":"Mimetics in judicial argumentation: A theoretical exploration","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Element (criminal law); Epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.022701257793982257,"score_gpt":0.25879858128530625,"score_spread":0.236097323491324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W796918528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.072364755,0.02706054,0.18132338,0.06763784,0.0007372725,0.00014008537,0.000072832205,0.00012826204,0.65053505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97031164,0.0053972146,0.016280442,0.001218241,0.00081123796,0.00015556425,0.00002775353,0.000047755548,0.0057501774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835729,0.013137247,0.00038430025,0.0006416942,0.0015186591,0.0007451582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9642669,0.03020197,0.0018592463,0.0014616344,0.001535297,0.0006750944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011904333,0.00082794344,0.0012742121,0.005663629,0.0067720856,0.014462675,0.0036756194,0.008224697,0.007661849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023807595,0.00077369454,0.0014283009,0.0051518087,0.04123327,0.020895358,0.005978338,0.005250342,0.0009649075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029524465,0.0000063940615,0.00004370423,0.000020248477,0.0000023910643,0.000033650842,0.0009851028,0.00016005489,0.000011301446,0.9976428,0.00015474088,0.0009365838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015706813,0.000011647137,0.00008732188,0.00010482494,0.000004838553,0.000101582664,0.001651361,0.00233156,0.000034893445,0.98916316,0.0064861397,0.0000070057154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019846098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015257202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014462675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072224652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038342336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06295687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W799203385","doi":"","title":"Anatomy of Anatomy of a Murder","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cineaction!","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; White (mutation); Biography; Art; Shot (pellet); Plot (graphics); Art history; Club; Philosophy; Medicine; Anatomy","score_opus":0.01163769206282824,"score_gpt":0.323876614419843,"score_spread":0.3122389223570148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W799203385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032679548,0.010689903,0.005410479,0.013377157,0.0035906488,0.00007318998,0.00013289304,0.00024855835,0.96320915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22696085,0.016632272,0.008219289,0.009788939,0.004371422,0.00016432987,0.00026324645,0.0004110885,0.7331885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969923,0.00009951978,0.000013625532,0.00005858729,0.00008082247,0.00004830477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998604,0.000032106804,0.0000210523,0.000021127822,0.000034629327,0.000030581148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019690846,0.0004217055,0.00014282817,0.0006919295,0.0024195036,0.0022076755,0.00057690614,0.0022735114,0.03354653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011898709,0.00023337005,0.00020814827,0.00039319682,0.006311017,0.0023541197,0.0021360677,0.0029450187,0.007861209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000402998,0.000013807948,0.00030122424,0.00013517505,0.000003594236,0.0013364252,0.0070975083,0.00016457072,0.0008836235,0.59792477,0.3284391,0.06365991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041276085,0.000015288542,0.00061964785,0.000158714,0.0000022081597,0.002620841,0.00087085733,0.00006446177,0.00010534797,0.022015056,0.9735174,0.000006040404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006104762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0087404335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03354653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014248752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012892577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11222434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W801070547","doi":"","title":"Paul Schliesmann. Honour on Trial: The Shafia Murders and the Culture of Honour Killings","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian ethnic studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Wife; Sociology; Law; Immigration; History; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.09111561831812515,"score_gpt":0.3673552577836744,"score_spread":0.27623963946554925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W801070547","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013810977,0.55777305,0.00029352025,0.24903417,0.01799131,0.000037726553,0.00036229167,0.0001610037,0.1729659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021593358,0.32590225,0.00040623843,0.03387127,0.00895106,0.00005691059,0.00033626932,0.00019541768,0.6086872],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949515,0.000097300835,0.000021606855,0.000059834274,0.00024881828,0.00007738007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920183,0.00023901578,0.0000824926,0.000024152585,0.00020749797,0.00024495495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050846225,0.0011971398,0.00042631474,0.0012784725,0.0036370214,0.0041319523,0.0008909803,0.0029966102,0.04948135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017884679,0.00052697863,0.00019634358,0.002170425,0.0028939177,0.0059873722,0.0022905446,0.0027147608,0.020476846],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005154083,0.000004976346,0.00015378602,0.00008789111,0.0000015125514,0.00006386974,0.0014513255,0.000011619946,0.00003749659,0.0020066327,0.9704142,0.025761466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028290247,0.000003740272,0.0011537342,0.00032866624,0.0000016539461,0.00012193027,0.0033785084,0.000013397559,0.000026476318,0.0012007793,0.99376065,0.0000076008637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17350772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4334612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8264923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006032719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034377594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34499556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W805772060","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2593563","title":"The Schizophrenic Jury and Other Palladia of Liberty: A Critical Historical Analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jury; Psychology; Law; Criminology; Political science","score_opus":0.01810308559516925,"score_gpt":0.2952320552885439,"score_spread":0.27712896969337464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W805772060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16957787,0.034859933,0.010664522,0.13592854,0.0016955468,0.00014576227,0.00027244264,0.000044056815,0.64681137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96695465,0.004794164,0.00078804104,0.006828944,0.0007001122,0.00007776473,0.000035783967,0.000062797786,0.019757679],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585515,0.0022671141,0.00015259012,0.00054260157,0.00037526153,0.00080725236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992733,0.0054157013,0.0005583526,0.00034959262,0.00049252954,0.0004508017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074103517,0.00044911331,0.00066449103,0.0050211353,0.015377415,0.008972882,0.0017057452,0.007324054,0.00586748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017439796,0.00068363367,0.00037113007,0.002681233,0.0763948,0.011558465,0.0071127117,0.01407106,0.00037906208],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065373647,0.0000040997425,0.00007607477,0.000009999931,0.000001481705,0.000064004285,0.010768508,0.000023249073,0.000010159703,0.9871557,0.0010175251,0.0008626492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046257454,0.000048302216,0.0021072319,0.0005817873,0.000025083535,0.00064902223,0.039043676,0.0004687641,0.0004934082,0.68518335,0.2712851,0.000068032714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018358437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02488613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018358437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01493808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007314208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108383834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W819072765","doi":"","title":"The Constitutional Protection of Freedom of Expression by Richard Moon (review)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Quarterly","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of expression; Expression (computer science); Law; History; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Human rights","score_opus":0.010952491976935933,"score_gpt":0.22720196784450958,"score_spread":0.21624947586757365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W819072765","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000059520327,0.9748854,0.000041390875,0.021971269,0.0016604586,0.000003064374,0.000015650121,0.0000016594507,0.0013615772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029413712,0.97375363,0.000089575995,0.017530246,0.0038437897,0.000015364993,0.000028620134,0.000004233226,0.001793279],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735284,0.0011627846,0.0002295779,0.00024505908,0.00077181496,0.00023786738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99436104,0.0036622589,0.00066127715,0.0001417667,0.0009118787,0.00026169152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003771979,0.0006342246,0.0018368397,0.0021514108,0.0010460708,0.002996311,0.0013395746,0.00589477,0.004929967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01015498,0.00058435154,0.0006666925,0.0035664162,0.0050483043,0.003829994,0.001685541,0.0049710115,0.001467205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014258406,0.000024083054,0.00029598986,0.010421382,0.0001705203,0.000118422635,0.00047174867,0.00016030576,0.00014754868,0.047570128,0.7206005,0.21987678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000499917,0.000027335469,0.0014413713,0.007338675,0.00009236734,0.00022678751,0.00018819679,0.000016945676,0.000055499288,0.0065475367,0.983994,0.00002121782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022777835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04031034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022777835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004098656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008182591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04529047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W829409842","doi":"","title":"Some Arbitrary Forays into the Toronto Film Festival","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cineaction!","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foregrounding; Champion; Period (music); Media studies; Minor (academic); Movie theater; Witness; History; Aesthetics; Visual arts; Sociology; Art; Art history; Law; Political science; Literature","score_opus":0.012961461808433158,"score_gpt":0.2815939095008496,"score_spread":0.26863244769241645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W829409842","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013729915,0.03522404,0.0019015081,0.12825924,0.032298334,0.0002835719,0.004566689,0.00065045775,0.78308636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18333231,0.021199599,0.0025759304,0.019299923,0.0065640076,0.00023675709,0.0024265354,0.0011659195,0.7631991],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970192,0.00066025846,0.00009662324,0.00029474986,0.001062501,0.0008666188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99640465,0.00032237938,0.00013576,0.00027305298,0.0008174655,0.0020466712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027711738,0.0010701831,0.00047769537,0.0016822402,0.018443074,0.014612189,0.001519922,0.0024050623,0.08051698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050301487,0.0007617754,0.00051392196,0.0023992085,0.0075310003,0.0038551106,0.006758843,0.006319866,0.0076138997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009344273,0.000019629293,0.00076675764,0.0001745695,0.0000064702767,0.00030392082,0.014277062,0.00008163973,0.0005122859,0.0880165,0.87938356,0.016364066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040883688,0.000012250722,0.002052852,0.00016593485,0.0000018668304,0.00003284481,0.00727557,0.000020258543,0.00007090651,0.00084403873,0.98950446,0.0000149474035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72761554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89528537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27238446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045486197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016261846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54797715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W83824808","doi":"10.15779/z38ng86","title":"Intangible Captivity: The Potential for a New Canadian Criminal Defense of Brainwashing and Its Implications for the Battered Woman","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Criminology; Automatism (medicine); Spouse; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Law; Sociology; Political science; History; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.0403741728232715,"score_gpt":0.2961443630303947,"score_spread":0.2557701902071232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W83824808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.358558,0.008072414,0.0075199315,0.16053675,0.0006710359,0.00008080737,0.00007098426,0.00004236085,0.46444774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98254484,0.001644258,0.0010853418,0.002993209,0.000049330072,0.000011488638,0.000008837792,0.000007854524,0.011654899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793375,0.00039649976,0.000043353404,0.00022441689,0.0006435885,0.00075841165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782926,0.00056056876,0.00024960376,0.00014304559,0.0008224228,0.00039510397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022032505,0.00033300024,0.00026198893,0.0012615541,0.020124791,0.0059376317,0.0016877892,0.0028708975,0.003218405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048690964,0.00022264592,0.00033465293,0.0009873314,0.03748923,0.0030324562,0.0048960876,0.004694097,0.00013632722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014296362,0.000006673931,0.0035382775,0.0000388948,0.000004414263,0.000856462,0.04620438,0.00017019847,0.00032646972,0.9295492,0.0033386035,0.015952175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029877374,0.0000757982,0.021491928,0.00063633476,0.0000794434,0.0025322814,0.30909356,0.0022602451,0.0014045729,0.30452946,0.35759258,0.00027386798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9064245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95714265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09357548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037128273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059735082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2693857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W845405134","doi":"","title":"Principle and Imagination in Judging: A Conversation with Mr. Justice James MacPherson","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie journal of legal studies","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Scrutiny; Sociology; Skepticism; Conversation; Appeal; Premise; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.018159643009412228,"score_gpt":0.3139202530030376,"score_spread":0.29576060999362536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W845405134","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064251577,0.023268472,0.0005457669,0.9453658,0.009245633,0.000033323853,0.000021075357,0.000031561678,0.01506321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19948068,0.015964514,0.0024413741,0.74080765,0.011306302,0.00014002221,0.000032999375,0.00024550955,0.029581005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9750542,0.015622729,0.00046732213,0.0018251421,0.004331881,0.0026987193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96942735,0.018481629,0.0006788766,0.000416547,0.0035242904,0.0074713933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022713138,0.000980721,0.0019676725,0.0020819572,0.053350292,0.015725931,0.003832454,0.018237988,0.0042563975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0363708,0.0012585255,0.0010195393,0.001586851,0.034736224,0.012828953,0.006319357,0.045154206,0.0008327898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005372408,0.00011175127,0.00050389004,0.000141068,0.000025452378,0.0018914953,0.27205473,0.00008978413,0.00045128932,0.04623488,0.664106,0.014335887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027573304,0.00006409494,0.0010745369,0.0006292853,0.000011431297,0.0010590305,0.1647364,0.00018493323,0.00018342251,0.010874195,0.8210247,0.00013030988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25224945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30527404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7477505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029343411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020709442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50156236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W84822421","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v30i1.4361","title":"ESSENTIALISM MAKES FOR STRANGE BEDMATES: THE SUPREME COURT CASE OF J.A. AND THE INTERVENTION OF L.E.A.F.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Ideology; Conservatism; Jurisprudence; Law; Intervention (counseling); Convergence (economics); Politics; Identity (music); Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047730681184722394,"score_gpt":0.36511387138368107,"score_spread":0.31738319019895866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W84822421","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24437809,0.004536317,0.00562884,0.24505202,0.0011851043,0.00005380843,0.00010327293,0.00006421627,0.4989983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9535873,0.0005718119,0.00047768425,0.019701425,0.000118737415,0.000011552162,0.000013095832,0.000024021569,0.025494479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99471223,0.0013399381,0.00006912691,0.00058626954,0.0010068776,0.0022855522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979832,0.0008699957,0.000112289745,0.00011370161,0.00034989178,0.000570891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043351767,0.0003102947,0.0004583022,0.000778201,0.03884611,0.0075071095,0.0016945129,0.009040228,0.0030158395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00712886,0.00047854672,0.0005919737,0.00062629295,0.03669294,0.0040663937,0.00437692,0.011814285,0.00030424062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002935813,0.0000147806195,0.0012217846,0.000015023778,0.000006197528,0.0014233341,0.06729059,0.00007300561,0.00023738768,0.90977496,0.015199044,0.004714674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009282106,0.00007358299,0.008813087,0.0003905014,0.000086624175,0.0015877722,0.19312544,0.0006933077,0.001752837,0.25632057,0.53689325,0.00017018648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7620394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88256776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23796058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029447814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02891343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47872394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W853638820","doi":"","title":"Festival de films sur les droits de la personne de Montréal : Filmer est aussi un acte moral","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.008928404997938845,"score_gpt":0.19055050884143823,"score_spread":0.1816221038434994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W853638820","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5221238,0.013139722,0.0016662584,0.12864877,0.0052850163,0.00015184419,0.0020148149,0.00016923844,0.3268005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84510756,0.002165372,0.00034176357,0.003359807,0.0005379922,0.000039858114,0.00018408212,0.00010480525,0.14815877],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993087,0.00020663327,0.000010846185,0.00008590793,0.00014758909,0.00024030349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885666,0.00030343697,0.000102212056,0.000049890434,0.00024727476,0.0004405806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007953346,0.0006467063,0.0002288381,0.00084548147,0.018827267,0.005373868,0.0008629342,0.0018356862,0.018479615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029637953,0.0003364346,0.0002718398,0.0015108399,0.0072175195,0.0019456466,0.0025613033,0.0046538906,0.00041099332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027771082,0.00009454467,0.0077062924,0.00027899165,0.000090357906,0.0019693004,0.5274252,0.00040275053,0.0054338514,0.10089377,0.33077925,0.024647864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016816704,0.000025536476,0.027025575,0.00014518565,0.000024502908,0.00016823564,0.16395222,0.00009253723,0.0010883532,0.00088899856,0.80651796,0.0000539909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8922945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9544303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.107705474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023146553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012485807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21667951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W86019428","doi":"","title":"After Labaye: The Harm Test of Obscenity, the New Judicial Vacuum and the Relevance of Familiar Voices","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Law; Harm; Economic Justice; Political science; Relevance (law); Legislature; Sociology","score_opus":0.005294188956592675,"score_gpt":0.25500926674332225,"score_spread":0.24971507778672958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W86019428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10572915,0.028357306,0.0073844534,0.3707721,0.0022405628,0.00005844241,0.000111700305,0.00009988163,0.48524642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8495716,0.0037124306,0.0013143853,0.07145214,0.0005484681,0.000031395284,0.00003367423,0.00008631074,0.073249444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99220276,0.0023273875,0.00014865944,0.0008149386,0.0030614643,0.0014448591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965406,0.0016923076,0.00021356111,0.0002565712,0.0009935882,0.0003033044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045923116,0.00031985124,0.0004574528,0.00095549016,0.019902658,0.013102767,0.0017244049,0.008677716,0.0035749613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013115876,0.0002584412,0.00045811373,0.00084544794,0.041471012,0.009545414,0.004200297,0.01291472,0.00062002067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022355223,0.0000066435273,0.00054139853,0.000046040997,0.0000049862506,0.0003934863,0.03332823,0.000035300418,0.00025382682,0.9311322,0.02157853,0.012657026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036083075,0.000054945347,0.0037788348,0.0007814139,0.000039203984,0.00073394517,0.08222956,0.0003053231,0.0020503772,0.25232744,0.6575283,0.00013451619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56157166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023426855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019956015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87111986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W886201916","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1443","title":"Book Review: The Constitutional Protection of Freedom of Expression, by Richard Moon","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of expression; Expression (computer science); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Astrobiology; Sociology; Computer science; Physics; Human rights","score_opus":0.02078325986556411,"score_gpt":0.2590517448321615,"score_spread":0.23826848496659736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W886201916","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000105555366,0.82050365,0.00028221396,0.09903528,0.05084833,0.000022357379,0.00011057456,0.000029352983,0.029062573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00393809,0.6499492,0.0004156379,0.088017374,0.09455526,0.000103357735,0.00024377705,0.00012071949,0.16265659],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988097,0.00027916912,0.00007395756,0.00017160753,0.0005800626,0.000085521315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759346,0.0013224607,0.0001421039,0.000080914484,0.0007252736,0.00013570566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013298906,0.0010393036,0.0014252791,0.0029603,0.001524647,0.0039530355,0.001554928,0.0065701385,0.014076552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062870113,0.0007295808,0.00051483465,0.0040664454,0.0027939486,0.004569967,0.0013599803,0.0067473347,0.008833588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038259413,0.0000037112827,0.0000128190095,0.00014992493,0.000002836138,0.000008961468,0.000018135772,0.000029476649,0.000018565353,0.0032479127,0.98520964,0.011294222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006489769,0.0000046637456,0.00014196394,0.00038174275,0.000005564509,0.000046314053,0.000028135802,0.000022091017,0.000021094538,0.002448006,0.9968886,0.0000052860164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018261103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041012615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018261103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004637127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045599756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04709077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W898745576","doi":"","title":"On the norms of visual argument","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Sociology; Positive economics; Computer science; Philosophy; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01741168997496906,"score_gpt":0.24336536792102895,"score_spread":0.2259536779460599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W898745576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07509233,0.002619052,0.102263734,0.049388148,0.0006759792,0.000090864705,0.00015468523,0.00014328356,0.769572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758446,0.00062601,0.01289535,0.0021487363,0.000457119,0.00021649146,0.00005876769,0.00010353747,0.0076493886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9697936,0.017973986,0.0015424006,0.0027905982,0.0067796377,0.001119707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90998024,0.06540979,0.0059676245,0.007407482,0.009802021,0.001432969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021451816,0.00045417147,0.0007557282,0.0023803625,0.0040272186,0.011681504,0.0015455642,0.005101275,0.005979327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076211765,0.0005091116,0.000700811,0.0010307874,0.03917508,0.014527261,0.0045345146,0.004804948,0.000976155],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008876129,0.0000055362093,0.00010755138,0.000012730531,0.0000021943324,0.000014736499,0.0007214043,0.00008679569,0.000048147496,0.9971373,0.00032642495,0.0015282184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010129497,0.0000066241073,0.00012469936,0.000034794903,0.0000032136213,0.000024059651,0.00037988657,0.00045600304,0.000097722266,0.9943771,0.00447944,0.000006365271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020763385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015307633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021451816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035161616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00266202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113449395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W904963040","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Cultural Law: International, Comparative, and Indigenous, by James A. R. Nafziger, Robert Kirkwood Paterson & Alison Dundes Renteln","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Law and economics; Law; Criminology; Sociology; Political science; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.025895214819082947,"score_gpt":0.32502393863534557,"score_spread":0.2991287238162626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W904963040","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008649978,0.91059285,0.00022599175,0.04838473,0.02596784,0.00001655162,0.00017157053,0.000031286763,0.014522762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016237253,0.8723924,0.00038675586,0.02247553,0.032879625,0.00005905097,0.0003295028,0.00007936255,0.06977402],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990908,0.00017306337,0.00007067809,0.00009128309,0.0005148042,0.000059437116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943019,0.0029341667,0.00038365548,0.00012890827,0.0018555322,0.00039576567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014861929,0.0012064937,0.0016928674,0.0050070286,0.0013455445,0.0048072883,0.0017068808,0.0030462327,0.028967708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008124789,0.00069363054,0.00057238207,0.008973967,0.0022947819,0.0059710285,0.0015257493,0.0041860226,0.012994143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044822245,0.000003742286,0.000026240064,0.00035589095,0.000003411321,0.00000744635,0.000026408241,0.000020674563,0.000016454975,0.0012220134,0.98039126,0.01792195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056630797,0.0000064927904,0.0002865468,0.0014426084,0.000008041456,0.00008515901,0.0000854791,0.000020442934,0.000020024774,0.001307983,0.99672514,0.0000064737965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016312324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051801592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028967708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036199135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007225546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09690666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W907949919","doi":"","title":"Commentary on: Paul van den Hoven's \"Mimetics in judicial argumentation: A theoretical exploration\"","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.019716354109331983,"score_gpt":0.25801406175510866,"score_spread":0.23829770764577668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W907949919","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001235191,0.0010691136,0.000105928426,0.98424613,0.0127974935,0.0000061941932,0.000036017653,0.000009353934,0.0016062058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049413852,0.00092054985,0.00016198494,0.97237104,0.01592205,0.000053799118,0.000018383704,0.00006633725,0.005544525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868666,0.0048003076,0.000889626,0.0021674745,0.003676568,0.0015994008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9346019,0.05084632,0.0023472067,0.0011484156,0.008724316,0.002331772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011919261,0.0014217679,0.002379811,0.002467057,0.016035616,0.010941977,0.008241193,0.086740926,0.008688914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08627118,0.0013947404,0.0018716716,0.0039345585,0.018317344,0.011424826,0.007757427,0.08163512,0.005142506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011793328,0.000002868023,0.00002128426,0.000051452367,0.0000065350678,0.00008038052,0.0013771809,0.000022694476,0.000019567706,0.010906281,0.98661786,0.00088209414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045568693,0.000010421048,0.00028012425,0.0008746202,0.000042946074,0.00017492537,0.0062089604,0.00019212472,0.0002234547,0.024872553,0.9670106,0.00006379345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07546222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13163786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086740926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013122747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017898735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15004599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W925296888","doi":"","title":"On Dove, visual evidence and verbal repackaging","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Dove; Argument (complex analysis); Skepticism; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.024486032309738736,"score_gpt":0.27183599502659905,"score_spread":0.24734996271686033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W925296888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014243149,0.0077754017,0.053517874,0.2479884,0.0023388488,0.00012119765,0.0001709446,0.00020132746,0.6736428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79828775,0.005639867,0.024153829,0.058506407,0.0043950668,0.00059064524,0.00014269011,0.0005523679,0.107731424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885443,0.006388348,0.00048066067,0.0015201735,0.0024031957,0.0006632554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97311777,0.020726088,0.0011330561,0.0023503632,0.0022072543,0.00046554636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011131005,0.00078513456,0.0007893013,0.0024439946,0.008212893,0.016268186,0.0030242573,0.013413854,0.011305826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04552018,0.00067427533,0.00094304275,0.0024757136,0.057230882,0.026961273,0.007156135,0.013817536,0.0020755986],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000796864,0.000004794505,0.0000669145,0.000023937913,0.0000027744654,0.00006133356,0.003162631,0.000053273292,0.000032141863,0.9880548,0.006919987,0.0016093763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001963146,0.000012211196,0.00016173544,0.00021068142,0.000008485191,0.000116446565,0.0035516873,0.00042439718,0.00021074372,0.8772314,0.11802597,0.000026428028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00735212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008338628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016268186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045872135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031132943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058867097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W92960164","doi":"10.22459/hr.xv.12.2009.01","title":"Preface —Decolonising testimony: on the possibilities and limits of witnessing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Humanities Research","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council; Australian National University; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Epistemology; History; Sociology; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.2952807118842034,"score_gpt":0.4470710254949466,"score_spread":0.1517903136107432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W92960164","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037105277,0.13385722,0.0064911097,0.31226134,0.30913034,0.00038558716,0.0007357201,0.00013317501,0.23329502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12342385,0.12310566,0.004222318,0.18685591,0.40020242,0.0005164426,0.0006791207,0.0004094468,0.16058476],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981811,0.0009901613,0.00013460999,0.00020062817,0.0003977203,0.00009586055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98795533,0.008730784,0.00034999804,0.00034328658,0.0019795469,0.0006410277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002630135,0.00079134636,0.00044216454,0.0016328248,0.0054041264,0.00521768,0.0018323018,0.004615853,0.012687311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013883109,0.00026657546,0.0003498973,0.0014948423,0.00678584,0.007507603,0.003085138,0.011517944,0.004458792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035150388,0.000038488284,0.00029406595,0.00054796063,0.0000053809586,0.00037370264,0.0058848504,0.00009204085,0.00054602994,0.09069155,0.8718419,0.029648915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029939492,0.000024474373,0.0005348443,0.00065880147,0.0000022427193,0.0002087112,0.0026883355,0.00010191657,0.00013828489,0.0115250945,0.98410195,0.00001239622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007324189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005672452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012687311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034330282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001710681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042443216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W93971668","doi":"10.21991/c95376","title":"THE BURDEN OF PROOF, THE CHARTER, AND A HIERARCHY OF LEGAL NORMS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Burden of proof; Charter; Hierarchy; Law and economics; Mathematics; Law; Political science; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.022903121811051124,"score_gpt":0.25670988416969515,"score_spread":0.23380676235864403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W93971668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033076055,0.00818884,0.35972193,0.20017722,0.002462853,0.00038649293,0.0005060972,0.00038792682,0.39509267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81653494,0.0032494133,0.13747194,0.011589639,0.0042078453,0.0009822429,0.00022803718,0.00032462834,0.025411278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9234552,0.039200846,0.005298568,0.0076282863,0.020055883,0.004361215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8814893,0.07153117,0.009139275,0.015797894,0.017096825,0.0049455785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060747538,0.0013139222,0.0027635836,0.006639666,0.016035782,0.022777155,0.0039658532,0.013970226,0.006930589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09953883,0.0018933419,0.0016789514,0.004357613,0.09241053,0.039092626,0.008142955,0.020454343,0.0013804099],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004455408,0.0000056230774,0.00003293973,0.000008811628,0.0000019350007,0.0000073351134,0.00028024413,0.0000692269,0.000029152021,0.9978016,0.0007819567,0.0009766335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026928788,0.000009544495,0.00007480055,0.000045430483,0.000005476735,0.000021671283,0.00015489916,0.00045007694,0.00006527064,0.9905799,0.008546671,0.00001923092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015324556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009072828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060747538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012166364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022812372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3212675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W95500719","doi":"","title":"Patrick A. Molinari (dir.). \"Dialogues about Justice: The Public, Legislators, Courts and the Media / Dialogues sur la justice","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Law; Sociology; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.020292932874389578,"score_gpt":0.25094501418920767,"score_spread":0.2306520813148181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W95500719","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00032713093,0.3685666,0.00072562945,0.49037582,0.12352559,0.00008195294,0.0010285275,0.00019819385,0.015170564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0129166655,0.42733636,0.0017126502,0.19805172,0.06661598,0.00041189778,0.0009971003,0.00033782216,0.29161987],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975037,0.0008127764,0.00022575377,0.00037867192,0.0008495712,0.00022951892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962953,0.0010613074,0.0005358321,0.000055837543,0.0014529952,0.0005987418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003536086,0.0019492565,0.0010647359,0.0021872325,0.0034535828,0.0034469033,0.0012952184,0.0070371297,0.037024397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077138823,0.00087566336,0.00067131204,0.0022302193,0.0010079262,0.004152892,0.0022588444,0.009815052,0.03587893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025945452,0.0000042565916,0.000106767235,0.0001452289,0.0000034116963,0.000038674098,0.000108214976,0.0000087608705,0.000018497587,0.0006723628,0.9803842,0.01848376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001909681,0.00002458898,0.0017981768,0.0005626356,0.000013481181,0.00017584562,0.00044477722,0.000034079865,0.00012511537,0.0013519272,0.9954314,0.00001887852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030626904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052201927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037024397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028666449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027802626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12385899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W971430910","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1335","title":"Europe's Darker Legacies; Notes on Mirror Reflections, the Constitution as Fetish, and Other Such Linkages between the Past and the Future Darker Legacies of Law in Europe; The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism over Europe and Its Legal Traditions Edited, by Christian Joerges and Navraj Singh Ghaleigh (eds); European Constitutionalism beyond the State, by J. H. H. Weiler and Marlene Wind (eds)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Shadow (psychology); Political science; Law; History; Economic history","score_opus":0.01636386508543001,"score_gpt":0.2760970195185473,"score_spread":0.2597331544331173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W971430910","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04578222,0.12619528,0.0051389355,0.1413218,0.0033099235,0.000018256125,0.00013231457,0.00007551368,0.6780259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81150264,0.031023799,0.002941664,0.016067946,0.001348401,0.00004023294,0.0000952672,0.00012750238,0.13685262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989077,0.00050038827,0.00003716713,0.00012696905,0.00026701932,0.00016083088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993687,0.00033463564,0.00007179191,0.00007753264,0.00006252445,0.0000847002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019663067,0.00034210895,0.00024606293,0.0009976788,0.0041055735,0.012951945,0.00060189905,0.00288208,0.004223171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003327146,0.00018686948,0.00021593315,0.0017989812,0.014715478,0.0068179723,0.0032593342,0.0028972395,0.00040704818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007732086,0.000008251779,0.00019948349,0.00001763572,0.0000025959282,0.00007216482,0.006877706,0.000053221247,0.00006190275,0.95123947,0.030628884,0.01083094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071923023,0.0000072765274,0.001957862,0.00022240082,0.000004367855,0.00013190405,0.008074559,0.00009919032,0.0001933437,0.3039769,0.685315,0.000010015775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070307986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014949852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012951945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029036233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032231442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02106738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W981261739","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511770678.007","title":"Civic amnesia and legal memory: to remember and forget in the lawcourts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Praise; Blame; Rhetoric; Amnesia; Temporality; Recall; Psychology; Literature; History; Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy; Art; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.01690925226740925,"score_gpt":0.22289877114918963,"score_spread":0.20598951888178038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W981261739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033630855,0.08785366,0.0012909241,0.04453209,0.0011949304,0.000014006162,0.000034590128,0.000053380227,0.8313956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60613567,0.04020715,0.0010191761,0.008867761,0.0013401966,0.000030421465,0.000051128256,0.00004990121,0.34229866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986935,0.000060508213,0.0000038470293,0.000017146083,0.000029303563,0.000019883664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967766,0.00019748608,0.00002463464,0.00003093131,0.00003481856,0.000034427685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047365742,0.00022692757,0.00017965228,0.00068875443,0.001536392,0.0027827597,0.0004313631,0.0014119194,0.006583816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013165891,0.00011507868,0.00009006611,0.00049860077,0.008408257,0.0040487736,0.0009166499,0.0022825708,0.00072523585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019074809,0.000056403773,0.0007638774,0.000069558824,0.000005491827,0.0005451283,0.041512564,0.000091759175,0.00015765846,0.8017833,0.07567585,0.079319425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012554767,0.0000215363,0.0023527464,0.00045264495,0.0000062784698,0.0012331943,0.015338681,0.00015010998,0.00024915626,0.44910365,0.53106755,0.000011984242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003899291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00920502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006583816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016051687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001221965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022025049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W988044520","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1321","title":"Book Notes: Law on the Screen, by Austin Sarat, Lawrence Douglas and Martha Merill Umphrey (eds)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.014889312469629438,"score_gpt":0.2548402105460134,"score_spread":0.23995089807638398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W988044520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005959763,0.16887143,0.0015505955,0.16663103,0.018786687,0.000062071806,0.00090116926,0.00039084424,0.64221025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004989996,0.046849217,0.00088968384,0.03944806,0.006287226,0.000097585114,0.00042587225,0.00026359997,0.90074885],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991025,0.00021473975,0.000028858676,0.00008557274,0.00048155303,0.00008685096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761045,0.0012003505,0.00008969613,0.00011363952,0.00074806716,0.00023782357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001231299,0.00095261465,0.0008279604,0.002069558,0.0054259864,0.009482027,0.0015538438,0.0065905554,0.11449624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045347214,0.0007887843,0.0004913983,0.0033494763,0.003924758,0.010017769,0.0018037148,0.0052513434,0.051022362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024706353,0.000005248623,0.000018431176,0.000021915468,4.4940137e-7,0.0000044126746,0.000088250126,0.000011961263,0.000012212426,0.008501388,0.9844067,0.006926548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028988186,0.000003895155,0.00017329011,0.00017463509,0.0000016531784,0.000013559197,0.00044925002,0.000025981635,0.000027270513,0.0073863612,0.99173564,0.000005546299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08357069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22882321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11449624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005546891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070046843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38302803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W98950283","doi":"10.1007/s11417-014-9181-y","title":"Review of Leonidas K. Cheliotis, The Arts of Imprisonment: Control, Resistance and Empowerment","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Journal of Criminology","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Imprisonment; Empowerment; Resistance (ecology); The arts; Sociology; Political science; Criminology; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.023025628465948942,"score_gpt":0.3020250780397069,"score_spread":0.27899944957375794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W98950283","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000026447204,0.986067,0.00004455607,0.008814028,0.004154066,0.0000040888285,0.000025825637,0.0000024178862,0.0008615753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00039807672,0.990148,0.00005430967,0.0050463476,0.0035002716,0.000008554836,0.000030110208,0.0000035571916,0.0008108649],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998816,0.00031859975,0.0002094939,0.0001611158,0.00041970744,0.00007519036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99311674,0.0040299124,0.0004085479,0.00011382011,0.0019326321,0.00039839806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023892329,0.001157493,0.0020198876,0.0056719272,0.0010195115,0.0027423943,0.0020517313,0.003965812,0.005696593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010600238,0.0005820198,0.00056546833,0.006166651,0.0020521374,0.0042371205,0.0014973411,0.0048298547,0.003715416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004088771,0.000026264892,0.00013624935,0.01226825,0.000061410756,0.00012390665,0.00030167503,0.000111052665,0.000094152776,0.0070942943,0.7663626,0.2133794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010213306,0.0000145182785,0.0005738253,0.008279436,0.000037398288,0.00029717968,0.00015247324,0.00001801911,0.00003789044,0.0010762392,0.98948926,0.000013392964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011044178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022167414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011044178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002943644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005813637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021959782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W994048070","doi":"","title":"Paul G. McHugh: \"Aboroginal Societies and the Common Law","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.013666433238796395,"score_gpt":0.26177182007226624,"score_spread":0.24810538683346983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W994048070","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006320432,0.08463634,0.004296439,0.7268099,0.006019084,0.000058588575,0.00022340182,0.00007750031,0.17155835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3734063,0.074534245,0.006960052,0.25557578,0.00887945,0.0002535351,0.00018823978,0.00014953708,0.28005293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979007,0.0009246281,0.000073620016,0.00027542093,0.00057836814,0.00024717784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790895,0.0012455649,0.00019431184,0.00012327793,0.00036577604,0.00016214457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024741632,0.0005257607,0.00034449273,0.001207153,0.00496007,0.006431316,0.0014251847,0.008925785,0.00801326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072241197,0.00031161393,0.00032957847,0.0016627104,0.008633532,0.008145625,0.0028743655,0.006672837,0.0011698629],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011984907,0.00000781481,0.00022340385,0.00005425547,0.000003426292,0.000059564736,0.0035030565,0.000047522943,0.00004644063,0.7848702,0.20555559,0.005616678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015936766,0.000014137705,0.0020373154,0.0005019547,0.00001155606,0.000115741874,0.003831781,0.00016502688,0.00029614125,0.27140942,0.7215703,0.00003067981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072756246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1115257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072756246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040304903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004513967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14466548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}